YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
No.27180 [View All]
The mad lad MauLer is doing it again.
____________________________
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.27484
>>27470
Too bad the Disney films don't bother to even follow the world's own rules and logic.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.27485
>>27470
>survive in the vacuum of space with nothing but a breathing mask.
They were inside an exogorth. Or are you using the Rebels space scene as a fucking reference you pleb? That scene in Rogue One was just terrible, made even worse by the fact that the ships were obviously undetailed scans of real life buildable toy models that looked fake as shit.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.27486
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
>>27312
>>27350
>>27340
You all seem to be forgetting that Mauler already a made a short and accurate critique of TFA. The new videos coming out are just him doing extra long commentary that goes into detail by breaking down every issue with the film, including other shitty critics like the hack frauds and Angry Joe.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.27488
>>27192
The webm is wrong. The engines of the star destroyers in orbit of Scarif were disabled by the Y-wings so they were already losing their orbit. The SD needed a little push from the small ship and the gravity of the planet did the rest.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.27489
>>27488
It doesn't matter if the engines are activated or not, there's a little thing called inertia that you can't get around. For the same reason, it also doesn't matter whether or not the ship is being pushed in the direction of gravity. Even without engines it has an orbital trajectory and won't just fall straight down into the planet.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.27490
>>27489
>there's a little thing called inertia that you can't get around
I know but the ships weren't moving, they were stationned near the shield gate.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.27491
>>27490
>weren't moving
All matter is constantly in motion. Can a pebble move a boulder simply because the pebble is moving and boulder isn't? Use your fucking head, you mongoloid fuck.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.27499
>>27485
I'm talking about the original concept for Star Wars. George wanted those breathing masks to be a much bigger thing.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.27507
>>27484
>Too bad the Disney films don't bother to even follow the world's own rules and logic.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.27635
>>27499
It never happened.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.27725
>>27188
TFA is far worse than JJ Trek.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.27726
>>27725
TFA is an elaborate deconstruction and destruction of a vital piece of culture. JJ Trek is just a shit action movie since Trek was always pozzed.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.27732
>>27726
You shut your pacifist whore mouth. Roddenberry may have been a socialist fag but Trek managed to be good in spite of that. There are also no less than three problematic Jew stereotypes in the show:
>short, physically weak, money-grubbing sex pests
>OY GEVALT MUH 50 MILLION, NEVER 4GET THE OCCUHOAX
>secretive cabal of shapeshifters that infiltrate foreign governments, subvert them from within, and hold themselves superior to all other beings. Think they are owed the galaxy because of unspecified atrocities done against them in the past.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.27748
Only Gene was pozzed. The people he worked with weren't. Specifically those involved with TOS and DS9. Those fucks at least tried to reign in Gene, unlike TNG which kissed his sorry ass at every turn. Even after he croaked. Of course then the show saw some improvement. However the original Star Trek pilot was the greatest of all, with Pike being the ultimate alpha surrounded of bros + gorgeous women who all wanted his dick. It was like the precursor to harem animes and I curse the day the fools at NBC didn't pick it up. The only real tragedy would be Nimoy and Shatner would've gotten shafted, but at least Takei wouldn't have gotten jack shit. Sadly Discovery and JJ's films are more pozzed than the most pozzed elements of Star Trek and Disney Wars combined and every day I am filled with shame and misery, not just for the existence of Discovery but what became my once two favorite franchises… Why must everything I love suffer?
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.27800
For those of you who want to read the greatest TLJ breakdown I've seen yet, here's a link to John Wright's 16-part review of it. It's the best one because he goes into the SJW anti-whitemalehero agenda that the film espouses in an explicit way that every other reviewer had to tiptoe around (especially in part 15, which is entirely about the agenda and message of TLJ):
http://www.scifiwright.com/2018/07/the-last-straw-01-star-wars-anonymous/
I did some checking on the guy, he thinks the democrats are just commies pretending to be nice, and republicans only pretend to oppose them; he seems to be a Trumpfag as of 3 months ago, and somewhat limited in racial awareness, though not blind. In other words, he's second only to E;R from what we've got to choose from.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.27802
>>27800
>somewhat limited in racial awareness, though not blind. In other words, he's second only to E;R from what we've got to choose from.
Well you can read Counter Currents mate.
>At one point, the audience is invited to laugh along with the Oriental heavy weapons guy, who seems to be carrying an industrial vacuum cleaner on his back, as he shoots a helpless Stormtrooper in the head. It’s the same Jewish malevolence on display as was explicit in Inglorious Basterds as they battered a loyal Nazi to death.
https://www.counter-currents.com/2016/12/rogue-one-whites-at-war-with-ourselves/
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.27805
>>27635
It says something about the spirit of Star Wars that George intended though. The "science" of the universe was to be more akin to old pulp adventure fiction than actual science. I think that's fine, as long as it's consistent, you stick to it, and you don't go changing rules on the fly.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.27813
>>27802
Thanks, will read.
>>27805
I'm glad that the universe's mechanics were just sensible and vague enough that it was possible to fill in the gaps in a way that turns it into borderline hard sci-fi.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.27828
>>27802
>read CounterCurrents
Sometimes you need to come up for air, Uncle /pol/.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.27847
>>27802
Huh, worth a read, especially because it triggers this retard >>27828
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.27877
>>27828
CounterCurrents has good articles. It's not The Daily Stormer or something.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.27880
>>27828
Can we get that derailing faggot out already?
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.27889
>>27828
I don't even like /pol/ since they're paranoid defeatists obsessed with taking us into a viking stone age, but CounterCurrents and E;R were one of the few bashing Disney Wars while everyone else was sucking its cock
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.27916
Well then, it's easy to rile them up too.
>>27877
>>27889
Ah, someone who actually wants people to listen to them. Have proceeded to reading the article on you two's recommendation.
>DailyStormer
It's not, though it is irritatingly coarse at parts. Disrupts the flow a bit.
>E;R
He's fun, gets a good critique while working the anti-PC humor in a natural way.
Let's see…
>Empire atrocities are options of last resort to Rebel aggression. The Empire functions similarly to the Judges in Mega City One and the United States Army in various foreign occupations — showing up in force to bully and intimidate the locals into not getting any funny ideas about getting their own sovereignty, and then disappearing again to patrol some more pressing parts of the galaxy. Twice the Death Star nukes a city, both times at huge cost to the themselves, as a means of preventing the Rebellion from getting out of hand. Civilian lives and the lives of Force disciples matter not to Rebels when a tactical advantage is at stake, and they will push the Empire to its most destructive in their desperation.
Yep, they get the Imperial ethos pretty well. Why didn't you post stuff like this, >>27802 ? It's much more useful to understanding what this article's actually about, which is finding allegory and how Disneyfilm are hacks for trying to half-assedly toss in their interpretation of modern day events. Not a bad article.
Wright, meanwhile, is for the filmography autiste who wants a look into every major failure of the movie from a technical and narrative outlook.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.27925
>>27916
I consider E;R to truly be on our side for the most part. Doesn't support self-censorship and says what he wants without giving a damn about consequences, and best of all he was the only one at the time, even before MauLer, to give the mouse the middle finger. It got him a shit ton of views and a lot of hate, but he didn't give Jar Jar Abrams any mercy. He also supports the EU in the sense that it was a good source of inspiration that Disney callously tossed aside instead of using it as a reference or inspiration. But the fact that he was the only one at the time unaffected by the rose tinted glasses handed out with each ticket of TFA and never backs down is what genuinely makes me respect the guy the most. Too bad he rarely updates, but hopefully that whole PewDiePie drama will give him incentive to really aim for the top and produce more content (without sacrificing quality I hope).
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.27977
>>27925
>I consider E;R to truly be on our side for the most part.
E;R willingly names the Gem in his reviews. I don't see how anyone could think otherwise.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.27988
>>27925
>>27977
He's also an unparalleled shitposter.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.29005
>>27236
I get that the guy has on the nose opinions about SW, but its best to just make webms out of the things he says and post them without his credit, otherwise its gonna lead back to this furfaggotry and no one takes a furfag seriously.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.29025
>>27236
I especially hate Rags. Why?
>"HURRR BFV CAN'T BE HISTORICALLY INACCURATE BECAUSE UH…. B-BECAUSE WELL BF1 COULD BECAUSE, LIKE, IT'D BE BORING! DURR"
>muh SJWism in muh WW2 shooters, even though BF1 had the same problems, and no one said a word but some German (alt-kike?/nu?)/pol/ack on YouTube
I'm not defending DICEA or their shitty titles, but fucking hell, talk about hypocrisy (and casualfaggotry).
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.29026
>>27246
>HURR WHO CARES LOL????
Pic related. Turn not away thy face.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.29096
>>27226
honestly i dug infinity war but i still recognize it as capeshit babby popcorn flicks
>>27227
one thing i've always argued is that george designed each star wars film to be able to be watched on their own, there's enough context thrown in that you don't need to watch a prior film to get a sense of where things are, and the disney films fail at this.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.29097
>>29025
Rags is a reply-girl. His entire youtube career is based on shitting on console fanboys. It's no surprise that he became one of Sargon's capos.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.29376
This faggots videos annoy the piss out of me. I want to see what he has to say about the movies. He has some good insight, but it's filtered through 7 layers of e celeb shit flinging. If you want to shit on the fanboys then by all means shit on them, but don't do it in your critique. It's like asking someone what's good on the menu and they bitch about their ex boyfriend. Who the fuck wants that?
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.29385
>>29376
Really? The opening mocking the shill critics was probably the best (and only entertaining) part.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.29388
>>29385
Why would you want to watch e celeb drama? Might as well go watch drama watch or some shit.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.29394
>>29388
You just answered your own question, dubsman.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.29395
>>29388
There was never a better compilation of TFA shills than that. It was needed to finally show how full of shit TFA defenders are.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.29483
>>27732
>You shut your pacifist whore mouth. Roddenberry may have been a socialist jew but get this. There are also no less than three problematic Jew stereotypes in the show! See, #based and reddipilled!
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.29485
>>29483
>not knowing a flippant post when you see it
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.29492
>>29483
You scoff, but despite having its share of bullshit, a lot of Trek runs amusingly counter to anything resembling current leftist shit. It presents a world in which human races and cultures have remained separate and distinct from each other hundreds of years into the future, and in which it is normal for people to hold themselves to high standards of moral and ethical conduct.
Polite sage for drifting off-topic.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.29565
>>29492
Aggressive, rude, tumultuous sage for polite sage.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.31436
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Part 2 is finally out. Huge improvement here in that there seems to be no eceleb bullshit clogging up the first half of it, as there was in part 1.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.31438
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.31439
>>31436
I never listened to the commentary for those pieces of shit films so imagine how high my blood pressure was when Tiny Johnson described the opening scene to The Last Blockbuster as "Monty Python like." I don't care what you think of MP, but at least they had fucking talent, and a fuckload of it too. Monty Python has managed to have their movies and jokes ingrained into society's mind decades later while I doubt Rian will be remembered for anything besides how much cock he can suck within 5 years. What a fucking pretentious twit.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.31443
>>27187
agree. The first hour of his first video could have been a video on its own
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.31451
>>31436
Very in-depth take as always. He's actually being more fair to TFA than I expected.
>>31443
It was actually made into a video of its own shortly afterwards.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.31542
>>31436
A little better than the first but it still has some e-celeb parts where I think he should have cut out. Argue against the common criticism instead of attacking the person directly. This is the one big problem that Mauler needs to fix in my opinion if he wants to be seen as fair. I have to say, the in-between with his other youtube friends I guess with the tapes are the worse part. Sure, they break up it being Mauler only speaking, but they have some of the shittiest opinions that I've ever heard.
Different perspectives and all that, but they self contradict the critique in what this whole video series is doing and really doesn't bring a counter argument to the critique that I can concede with "You have a point". When you say a bad movie is just a bad movie and that you shouldn't look too deep into it, you shit on those who have been analyzing movies since the start when it was beginning to be taken more seriously. I'd have to guess the people saying such comments come from a younger generation because in mine, we talked about what was good and what was bad about a film. We'd go even deeper into it if there was enough material to dissect. If we had conflicting arguments, we'd agree to disagree and move on. The only people who watch a movie once, and don't think about it afterwards has to be a rarity or a new breed of scum that I want no part of. The one reason why he have such an entertainment dystopia is because they haven't learned from the past. If you don't learn from previous successes and failures, how are you going to create something great that'll last years after?
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.31546
>>31542
>If you don't learn from previous successes and failures, how are you going to create something great that'll last years after?
Because qUAliTY iS SubjECtIVE.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.31949
>>31439
I have no idea what Brianlet thought was even Monty Pythony about that scene. Is Monty Python for him just a british man making weird noises?
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.31951
>>31949
i'm assuming it's the fact that a gag was shown to us within the opening moments of the film
because your mom jokes are totally monty python tier, you fucking manchild fascist
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.