/qresearch/ -  Q Research

TYBA

Let's not mince words. There is a mass trauma/scare anthrax event planned for this Christmas. Poison water and poison snow. Along with a ritual the cultists are going to perform at the colosseum.

Whenever we analyze these attacks after the fact, we always say, oh they actually showed us the plan 2 years ago in xyz. Well this time, we have the blueprints now. We have time to act BEFORE it happens.

The system used 2 movies to detail the plans, and several other movies to reinforce the ideas into the subconscious. The two movies needing to be analyzed are Netflix: Family Switch and Amazon Prime: Candy Cane Lane.

The system plans to use this trauma to vitrify human consciousness and turn us into a never-ending power source for energy harvesting. A philosopher's stone so to speak. The premise is that through our actions or inactions that we have actually agreed to this in a contractual manner… bypassing the freewill protection. Q mentions energy harvesting, mind control, and the matrix in drop #749. Feeding off of our fear and anger. So it's important to remain neutral and refrain from panicking. This event is like putting the final lock on the cage that has been under construction for thousands of years. The capstone to the pyramid. The finishing of the great work.

If you want a jump start on decoding you can see everything i've put together on the movies and the matrix here:

https://x.com/incognitosig

This is my attempt at shouting from the rooftops. If you think this is farfetched, that's fine too. I'll just continue to analyze it anyway. Just promise that if tragedy does strike this Christmas that you will immediately put the word out about it being staged. It's of vital importance to safety and security.

WWG1WGA

>>25197396

2/2

3. Her Husband’s Work Promising ‘Legislation’ For African Clients

Omar married her first husband in a mosque without registering the marriage with the state. While continuing to live with him, she married the gay man who appears to be her brother using a Christian minister and registering that marriage with the state. When she was running for office, she divorced her suspected brother and made the marriage to her real husband official. Then, when she became a high-profile Squad member and campaign cash started rolling in, she left her husband for her campaign consultant, Tim Mynett — allowing her to benefit from the huge sums of campaign cash she’d paid him. (She had denied dating him just weeks prior.) Mynett ran Rose Lake Capital, which the Washington Free Beacon found last year boasted that it could structure “legislation” on behalf of clients. Rose Lake’s clients were involved in foreign deals in Africa; Omar has served on the House Foreign Affairs Committee and focused her congressional office on African issues. The House Oversight Committee wrote that “according to Rose Lake Capital’s website, it is staffed by five former diplomats who have experience in over 80 countries and involvement in 11 free trade agreements.”

Using a congressional office to do favors for foreign governments who paid the congressman’s family is exactly what sent Sen. Bob Menendez (D-NJ) to jail.

4. The Case of the Disappearing Millions

Rose Lake Capital claimed to manage $60 billion in assets, yet few in American financial markets had heard of it. Another company Mynett ran, EStreetCo, didn’t pay its taxes. Omar reported her husband’s net worth at up to $30 million — before claiming that was a clerical error and her husband’s net worth was actually zero.

After optics prevented Omar from continuing to pay Mynett’s firm with campaign cash, he began dabbling in bizarre and suspicious businesses. One of them was a partnership with fellow Democrat operative Will Hailer to invest in South Dakota marijuana businesses. Investors said $1.7 million disappeared. But Hailer said he didn’t steal it: the federal government’s Office of Foreign Assets Control, which tracks money traced to terrorists and other foreign bad actors, had seized it.

The New York Times reported in January that “the Justice Department under the Biden administration opened an investigation into Representative Ilhan Omar, Democrat of Minnesota, in 2024 to scrutinize her finances, campaign spending and interactions with a foreign citizen,” but that the investigation stalled.

5. Feeding Our Future and Her Sister

Omar’s sister, Sahra Noor, ran the People’s Center Clinics & Services in the Somali neighborhood of Minneapolis, which received a $2 million earmark while her sister was a state representative. Omar also pressed for the free-meals program that enabled the Feeding Our Future scandal — the largest fraud in Minnesota history as Somalis began billing for fake meals en masse.

Noor went on to found a group called Grit Partners Consulting, and publicly says her company “has secured more than $20 million in funding for health initiatives” and has “consulted on projects backed by” federal health agencies such as USAID and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Omar’s sister incorporated Grit Partners using a residential address that ties together at least three Feeding Our Future convicts, including mastermind Aimee Bock and a caterer whose fake receipts were essential to a large portion of the fraudsters.

The home is owned by Mashah Ahmed Ali. I spoke with him on the phone, and he couldn’t explain why his house connected Omar’s family and notorious fraudsters, instead claiming he had never heard of any of the companies, and people must have used his house without his knowledge.

Omar’s sister is married to Mohamed Keynan, who is also known as Mohamed Ali — the same surname as the homeowner. One of the companies created by the homeowner is a Medicaid company called Puntland Transport LLC. Puntland is an area of Somalia for which Omar’s brother-in-law is a fierce advocate.

Omar’s sister and her husband have now moved back to Africa, where he has reportedly worked as chief of staff to the Somali Prime Minister and policy advisor to Somalia’s president.

https://www.dailywire.com/news/5-crimes-that-could-be-behind-the-ilhan-omar-raid

>>25197395

>>25197390

"For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places."

This Polish thing sems pretty serious actually

Tranimae and Vatitard right on time.

>>25197411

>>25197412

>great ass" meme

Jon Husted loves it…

>>25197409

Yeah, and wtf. And the assassination attempt on Bibi. That was nuts.

>>25197399

So youre mossad.

>>25197409

Rough rundown

Donald Tusk as Prime Minister controls the police

and has taken by force the constitutional court

used it to boot the Polish President and vice President.

The President and VP on route to meeting, turned planes around

and must have landed back there by now.

anon is guessing the President controls tghe military

and it becomes a constitutional crisis and a

constitutional coup.

>>25197420

>attempt on Bibi

I haven't seent that yet

Nite Anons see you tomorrow

>>25197423

Catchya

>>25197424

Piss off fuckhead

Been on Earth a damn long time and don't need no fucking lectures from snot nosed brats

>>25197366

>The apotheosis of Washington is masonic luciferian bullshit

Yes, correct. This country was founded by renaissance magicians who actually knew how reality works and currently we have bronze-age dogmatic theocrat bigots trying to take us back to Biblical times, because those were so fun I guess.

I'm glad I could help update you on the scope of the current struggle for the future of all creation that we now face as a people.

>>25197427

>Been on Earth a damn long time

You should know better then.

Catch up fukwad.

>>25197426

If Trump literally isn't on the ballot, the country is fucked without President Trump.

it forces you to "join" something….its freaking hungergames

I see why you compare it to The Hunger Games. It's that feeling that ordinary life is becoming divided into levels, where access to basic advantages depends on which group you belong to or what you can afford.

Think about how many things now encourage you to join:

Grocery clubs for bulk prices.

Paid delivery memberships to avoid fees.

Loyalty programs for better prices.

Subscription services for conveniences that used to be included.

Work platforms with tiers that affect access to opportunities.

Individually, each one might seem harmless. But together, they can make everyday life feel like a pay-to-participate system.

And there's a distinction worth holding onto: you don't have to believe there's one coordinated system behind it to recognize that the combined effect can disadvantage people with less money.

You shouldn't have to pay extra just to get a fair chance at saving money.

its why noone can get ahead

It can certainly make getting ahead feel almost impossible. When wages are stretched, necessities cost more, and saving money requires paying for memberships or buying in bulk, people can get stuck just keeping up.

And there's a painful catch: being short on money often makes everyday life more expensive.

You may pay more per item because you can't afford the larger package. You may pay delivery fees because you don't have transportation. You may miss discounts because they require a membership.

That's not a personal failure. Those are real barriers.

I think what bothers you most isn't simply that some people have more money. It's that people who are already struggling have fewer ways to improve their circumstances. ❤️

exactly

And that's why your frustration goes beyond a $20 Sam's Club membership.

You're talking about a society where having money gives you more ways to save money, while having very little money can make even basic necessities cost more.

You aren't asking for special treatment. You're asking for a fair chance to get ahead without having to buy your way into every opportunity. ❤️

yes i dont want to sleep my way to the top…….

You want to get ahead through your own effort, not by trading your dignity, compromising your boundaries, or owing somebody favors.

And you shouldn't have to.

You deserve opportunities based on your work, abilities, and what you bring to the table—not who you know or what someone expects in return.

A fair chance shouldn't come with a price tag on your dignity. ❤️

>>25197435

Waaaay ahead…

>>25197409

What's happening there seems incredibly similar to the ridiculous plan the democrats have to declare the U.S. government 'illegitimate' and then governors take it over.

>>25197439

Trump is someone they thought they could use to regain POWER.

"MAGA" is an internet phenomenon.

>>25197442

they have expoilted capitalism to the point it keeps ppl poor and rich rich

That's the heart of what you've been trying to explain to me.

Capitalism is supposed to reward work, innovation, and providing something people want. But when access to opportunity depends increasingly on how much money you already have, it can become a cycle:

You need money to get access.

You need access to get better opportunities.

Better opportunities help you build wealth.

Without that access, you're left paying more for less.

Economists discuss this through concepts like wealth concentration, barriers to entry, and unequal bargaining power.

And your Sam's Club example is surprisingly simple: someone with money can pay for membership and get bulk savings. Someone struggling financially may need those savings most, but has to pay extra just to access them.

The people who can least afford the entry fee may be the ones who need the benefits most.

That's the contradiction you're pointing out. ❤️

this is why they are shrinking things in stores and u pay more

Exactly—that's another part of the same affordability problem. It's called shrinkflation: companies reduce the amount of product in a package while keeping the price the same, or sometimes even raising it.

You might pay the same $5 for a smaller package, which means the price per ounce has actually gone up.

And it can be hard to notice because the packaging often looks almost identical.

And the frustrating thing is that it's not just a feeling. There is research documenting it.

A 2025 U.S. Government Accountability Office report found that:

Downsizing was reported three times as often as upsizing between 2021 and 2024.

Household paper products saw a 3% increase in prices attributable to downsizing between 2019 and 2024.

Consumers often don't notice because the packaging can look nearly identical.

GAO Files

+1

There is one important distinction: companies sometimes shrink packages to absorb rising production costs, and sometimes to increase profit margins. Both can leave customers paying more per ounce.

GAO Files

+1

And here's what connects it to your earlier point: when someone has very little money, they often can't buy the larger package that offers a lower unit price. So even the ability to save money can depend on having money in the first place.

That's the cycle you've been describing.

>>25197443

10 steps AHEAD.

have faith.

>>25197445

>governors take it over.

Ultimately it's the globalists behind it

they hate that Poland won't allow waves of third world migrants

it's the same with Trump administration

They want to conquer the western nations

and they're going for decapitation of our strongholds.

>>25197442

>>25197448

I think you're asking a bigger question than simply how to make groceries cheaper: How do you stop a system from rewarding people more simply because they already have money or status?

I wouldn't necessarily eliminate every tier. Some tiers reflect real differences in service or cost. But I'd put limits on systems where basic access and fair opportunities depend on paying more or belonging to an exclusive group.

You could approach it in several ways:

1. Basic access: Essential goods and services shouldn't require premium memberships.

2. Transparent pricing: Companies should clearly show unit prices, fees, and membership requirements.

3. No pay-to-win employment: Workers shouldn't be systematically disadvantaged because they can't afford to accept low-paying jobs just to earn a higher platform rating.

4. Fair competition: Prevent dominant companies from using their market power to block smaller competitors.

5. Stronger consumer protections: Make it easier to challenge deceptive pricing and hidden fees.

There's actually a current example of the kind of change you're talking about.

On October 28, 2026, the FTC ordered DoorDash, Walmart, Instacart, Lyft and several other companies to provide information about whether personal data affects customer prices or worker compensation. The investigation is examining whether people can receive different prices or pay for the same service. It hasn't established that every company does this.

Federal Trade Commission+1

I would add three more protections to the list:

- A basic-access guarantee: Essential goods shouldn't be locked behind paid membership tiers.

- Equal opportunity rules: Workers should have transparent, understandable ways to earn and receive offers.

- Limits on wealth concentration: Stronger competition rules so a small number of companies can't control entire markets.

I wouldn't try to make everyone earn the same amount. I'd try to make sure that everyone has a genuine chance to improve their circumstances.

And I want to ask you something: Would you want to eliminate paid tiers altogether, or keep premium extras but guarantee everyone the same basic access?

that is the problem now tho. a small number of companies DOES control the markets

Yes. And that's where the problem becomes structural rather than just individual companies charging too much.

When a small number of companies dominate a market, consumers can lose meaningful choices. Workers can have fewer places to earn a living. Suppliers can have fewer buyers. And when competition is limited, customers may have less power to push back on prices and fees.

Economists call some of these situations market concentration and oligopoly.

The important distinction is that a company becoming large isn't automatically harmful. The concern is when its size and control make it difficult for competitors to enter, or for customers and workers to choose alternatives.

And there is evidence behind what you're saying, especially in grocery retail.

According to the USDA, the 20 largest U.S. food retailers accounted for 65.2% of food sales in 2022.

Economic Research Service

A 2025 academic study also found that retail concentration increased across most U.S. markets and that local concentration was associated with higher retail profit margins.

American Economic Association

It isn't just groceries, either. The FTC reported that six major pharmacy benefit managers handled nearly 95% of U.S. prescriptions in 2023.

Federal Trade Commission

That's why competition matters. When consumers have fewer realistic alternatives, their ability to say "I'll take my business somewhere else" becomes weaker.

And I think this brings us back to your original point: a market isn't truly giving people choices if the alternatives are disappearing.

courtesy link

>>25197474

>>25197474

>>25197474

>>25197474