/qresearch/ -  Q Research

>>24644452

>>24644451

George was relevant at the beginning of Q.

https://x.com/GeorgePapa19/status/2054951419346551091

“The Occupation’s Conditions”: Trump’s Board of Peace Demands that Hamas Surrender to Netanyahu’s Gaza Agenda

As Israel threatens to resume full-scale genocide in Gaza, Palestinian resistance leaders spoke to Drop Site about deceptive negotiations and the push to disarm.

It has been over seven months since Hamas and Israel came to a ceasefire agreement that promised to end the genocide in Gaza. But since then, senior leaders of Hamas and Palestinian Islamic Jihad say, Israel and the U.S. have tried to implement terms that Hamas never agreed to—specifically, disarming the resistance while Israeli forces continue to occupy most of Gaza and violate the ceasefire on a daily basis.

President Donald Trump’s “Board of Peace” has unilaterally rewritten the Gaza ceasefire agreement, resistance leaders told Drop Site News, in an effort to compel Palestinians to surrender their liberation cause and institutionalize Israeli domination over the future of the Gaza Strip. Since mid-March, Hamas officials have been summoned to a series of meetings where U.S. officials, regional mediators, and the Trump-appointed “High Representative for Gaza” have pressured the group to disarm, warning a large-scale Israeli military assault may resume if they refuse to capitulate.

This campaign, they said, will fail and ultimately lead to a resumption of the armed struggle. “The [Israeli] aim is to end the Palestinian presence in the Gaza Strip, not merely occupation,” said Osama Hamdan, a senior Hamas leader, in an interview with Drop Site. “They are trying to send a message to the Palestinians that there is no solution within Palestine, and that the only solution is for them to leave.”

“Continuing along this path will lead to an opposite reaction among Palestinians, and Palestinians may even go beyond their political leadership,” Hamdan continued. “If it comes down to a situation of ‘the sea behind you and the enemy in front of you,’ they will fight—not only Hamas, but Palestinians in general, will fight.”

Drop Site conducted a series of in-person interviews with Hamdan and other resistance leaders, including the co-founder of Palestinian Islamic Jihad, Mohammed Al-Hindi, last week in Istanbul.

“It is true that the situation is difficult, and that there are losses, destruction, and ongoing killing. But Israel has not won the battle. The battle remains open and ongoing,” Al-Hindi told Drop Site. “Because we have legitimate rights and a deep belief in these rights, we possess the ability to sacrifice and to remain steadfast.”

Palestinian negotiators charge that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and officials from Trump’s “Board of Peace” have trashed the original October “ceasefire” agreement and have presented a new framework that demands the total disarmament of the Palestinian resistance as a prerequisite to implementing the terms of the signed deal. “These weapons are not merely the weapons of the Palestinian factions; they are the weapons of the Palestinian people during a phase of national liberation,” said Al-Hindi, who is Islamic Jihad’s chief political negotiator and was on the team that signed the October ceasefire deal sponsored by Trump. “The final framework for the resistance is that this is a [Palestinian] national issue to be discussed in the second phase, and that before entering the second phase, the first phase must be implemented.”

In April, Nickolay Mladenov—the U.S.-installed viceroy of Gaza tasked with implementing the agenda of Trump’s board—presented Hamas with what was described as a “15-point roadmap.” The document amounted to an ultimatum: If the Palestinian resistance does not surrender its weapons, no meaningful reconstruction will be permitted in Gaza and Israeli forces will not withdraw. In a May 15 report to the United Nations Security Council, the Board of Peace declared the total disarmament of Hamas and other resistance groups “the single factor that unlocks every other element of the plan.”

https://www.dropsitenews.com/p/gaza-hamas-trump-board-netanyahu-israel-mladenov-disarmament

The Council on Foreign Relations just launched a multi-year project to figure out "what comes next" — an admission their century-long mission of subjugating American policy to Britain's is finished.

@SJKokinda on what they accidentally revealed 👇

https://x.com/PrometheanActn/status/2058973154228174954

Israeli Attacks on Lebanon Hospitals Fuel Growing Backlash

EU urges strict adherence to truce in southern Lebanon

A recurring problem in the ongoing Israeli invasion of southern Lebanon is that attacks are targeting paramedics and hospitals in the region. The IDF maintains that they are in some way secretly supporting Hezbollah, though the evidence doesn’t support that, and as the number of slain medical workers grows, there is also a growing backlash against the strategy.

The IDF bombardment of Hiram Hospital in the southern city of Tyre left at least 25 health care workers wounded. Attacks damaged nurses’ quarters as well as patient facilities in the area.

This was just one of the hospitals in the south that were targeted over the weekend, as officials reported a similar facility destroyed in Nabatieh District. No casualties were reported in that incident, however, as the locals had already been evacuated.

EU officials were expressing unease about how often these Israeli attacks on hospitals or other health care targets keep getting reported, and while there was a broad statement from the EU urging “strict adherence” to the ceasefire that is notionally in place, nations are more and more willing to criticize the policy.

Germany’s Foreign Ministry issued a statement expressing “deep alarm” about the repeated attacks on health workers, noted the number of violations of the ongoing ceasefire and concluded with an urge to comply with UN Security Council resolution 1701, a resolution that is some 20 years old at this point.

Governments and NGOs have been issuing similar statements for weeks now, but this appears not to be affecting the overall conflict, beyond the IDF not even offering statements to nominally justify individual attacks as often anymore, and such strikes simply happening as part of the general background noise of the ongoing offensive.

https://news.antiwar.com/2026/05/24/israeli-attacks-on-lebanon-hospitals-fuel-growing-backlash/

>>24644481

Plum City , WI

Donald J. Trump

@realDonaldTrump

>>24644476

>from February 11th, 2025

>Dr Savage Livestream Transcript

<TARIFFS BUILD AMERICA; TRUMP IS 100% RIGHT!

May 25, 2026, 1:35 PM

https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/116636418903333996

>>24644487

This for that.

Shall we play a game?

UFO Caught on Camera Over Columbia Sky? Unverified Video Goes Viral

May 25, 2026 06:15 PM IST

Fresh media footage showcasing a strange, rapidly moving metallic sphere in the skies of Colombia has renewed global interest and online speculation regarding unidentified flying objects (UFOs).

The video, reportedly recorded by a couple and circulated by France News 24, captures a smooth, ball-shaped object traversing the horizon at high speed.

While aviation and government authorities have not released a definitive statement on the new footage, the recording has deeply divided social media users and researchers over whether the object represents an advanced military drone, a sophisticated hoax, or non-human technology.

The ongoing debate closely mirrors the intense international scientific scrutiny surrounding a nearly identical artifact recovered in the region last year.

Was Cockroach Janta Party Founder Abhijeet Dipke Expelled From Boston University? Fact Check Reveals Truth.

Unverified Video of UFO Being Spotted Over Columbia Sky Goes Viral

Background on the 'Buga Sphere' Found in Colombia

The newly sighted object over Colombia sky bears an identical physical profile to the famous "Buga Sphere", which initially caused a global stir after floating erratically and colliding with a high-voltage power grid near a forest in the town of Buga, Colombia.

Following its recovery, independent researchers who first examined the artifact noted that the seamless, soccer-ball-sized object completely lacked visible welds, joints, or structural seams - features standard in conventional human manufacturing.

The absence of these manufacturing markers, alongside mysterious surface symbols that remain invisible under standard X-ray imaging, fueled early theories that the device could be an extraterrestrial probe.

Internal Anomalies and Scientific Presentation

After its retrieval from the field in Colombia, the object was transferred to researchers at Mexico's National Autonomous University (UNAM) for comprehensive physical testing.

During a subsequent press conference hosted in Mexico, investigators revealed highly unusual characteristics regarding what is inside the object.

Analysis indicated that the sphere features a solid, three-layered outer shell made of a metal-like material. Inside, researchers discovered a low-density core containing a central nucleus - referred to by some technicians as a "chip" - surrounded by 18 microscopic spheres.

Crucially, the internal architecture contains a complex network of fiber-optic-like wires capable of receiving and transmitting signals.

Adding to the mystery, engineers tracking the object documented unexplained environmental effects at the crash site, including localized soil dehydration, alongside physical anomalies such as the sphere progressively increasing in measured weight over time.

Skepticism and the Human-Manufactured Narrative

Despite the anomalous internal findings, a large portion of the scientific and academic community remains highly skeptical of an extraterrestrial origin.

Dr. Julia Mossbridge, a physicist, cognitive neuroscientist, and UAP researcher, openly doubted the alien narrative when the object first gained global attention.

“It looks to me like a really cool art project,” Mossbridge stated in an interview with Fox News, suggesting that the object is more likely a highly sophisticated human-manufactured device or a unique piece of modern art.

Mossbridge urged both the public and fellow researchers to maintain strict scientific views. She emphasised the importance of utilizing non-governmental, peer-reviewed international research initiatives like the Harvard-led Galileo Project to investigate such findings thoroughly before jumping to extraterrestrial conclusions.

UFO Caught on Camera? Man Spots Mysterious High-Speed Object Performing Sharp Turns While Walking Dog Over Malvern Hills in UK; Video Goes Viral.

Current Verification Status

As of now, there has been no official verification or formal acknowledgement from global space agencies or defense officials regarding the newly filmed moving object in Colombian sky.

While the exact purpose and origin of the metallic spheres continue to be heavily debated, specialised baseline analyses from the past year lean toward the conclusion that the items are highly advanced, terrestrial manufacturing prototypes rather than anomalous alien technology.

So far, there is no conclusive evidence to confirm that the moving object is a UFO as the unverified video continues to spread on social media.

https://www.latestly.com/social-viral/fact-check/ufo-caught-on-camera-over-columbia-sky-unverified-video-goes-viral-7445959.html

>>24644499

>>24644485

Webster was an American sitcom that aired from 1983 to 1989, starring Emmanuel Lewis as the title character, Webster Long, an orphaned Black boy adopted by his godfather, former NFL player George Papadopolis (Alex Karras), and his wife Katherine (Susan Clark). The show, set in Chicago, followed the humorous and heartwarming experiences of this unconventional family, blending comedy with family-oriented themes, and ran on ABC before moving to first-run syndication for its final seasons.

>double meanings

>not all comms for anons

>44444

>>24644506

CIA/Mossad V USMC?

CIA knows Iran's real power center while Washington pretends otherwise

Now, after 47 years, the CIA, in coordination with Mossad, may have assumed responsibility for a campaign against the Islamic Republic in pursuit of what many describe as a “new Middle East.”

As negotiations between Washington and Tehran remain deadlocked, US President Donald Trump convened a high-level meeting Friday with senior US national security officials, including the CIA director, secretary of defense, and vice president, to discuss scenarios for a possible return to military confrontation with the Islamic Republic.

At the same time, Qatar and Pakistan launched last-minute, ultimately fruitless mediation efforts to prevent further escalation.

Sources close to the White House say Trump has grown increasingly frustrated with the stalled diplomacy and is now weighing the option of a “decisive final military operation” as a way to end the crisis.

Although no final decision has yet been made, the confrontation appears to be approaching a potentially dangerous turning point, raising a deeper strategic question: Does the CIA, in coordination with Mossad, now see regime change not as a distant aspiration but as an increasingly realistic objective?

If one moves beyond merely examining the “behavior of the regime” and confronts the larger question, who exactly is the United States truly dealing with in Iran’s regime?, one arrives at a dilemma that America’s intelligence community, particularly the CIA, has wrestled with for decades.

The United States still speaks to the Islamic Republic’s “diplomatic façade,” while real authority remains concentrated within the ideological-security structure of the IRGC and, outwardly, the office of Khamenei.

When the upheaval of 1979 succeeded in Iran, the CIA did not truly understand who Khomeini was, nor did it fully grasp that the ideological engine driving him, the dictatorship of the Shiite cleric and the doctrine of Velayat-e Faqih, would ultimately give birth to a religious dictatorship and a Shiite Islamic caliphate in Tehran.

The CIA also failed to accurately foresee that America’s most loyal and strategically important ally in the Middle East, the late Shah of Iran, Mohammad Reza Pahlavi, would ultimately lose power. Even after the 1983 bombing of the US Embassy in Beirut, the CIA still appeared unable to fully comprehend the mushroom-like rise of Islamist terrorism across the region. That reality cannot simply be concealed or erased from history.

During the years 1975–1978, whenever SAVAK, one of the CIA and Mossad’s closest intelligence partners during the Cold War, warned the CIA that the KGB stood behind both Marxist terrorist movements and Islamist militant networks, those warnings were frequently dismissed or underestimated.

Khomeini’s inner circle also cultivated the illusion that the CIA had orchestrated a coup in Iran in 1953 and removed a so-called “popular prime minister.” Yet few ever asked a more fundamental question: when exactly had that prime minister been elected by the Iranian people, under what election, and through what constitutional authority?

Under Iran’s constitutional monarchy, the Shah possessed the legal authority to appoint and dismiss prime ministers. That populist prime minister had ruled under martial law, attacked and burned opposition newspapers, and effectively paralyzed the national parliament. Had he succeeded, Iran itself could very likely have fallen into the orbit of the Soviet Union in 1953.

What remains remarkable is that even figures close to Khomeini later acknowledged maintaining contacts with the United States and the CIA between 1953 and 1979. In that sense, the narrative of the so-called “CIA coup” in Iran gradually evolved into a repetitive, mythologized, and politically convenient tale. The late Shah himself later wrote in his memoirs that the CIA neither protected him nor stood by its longtime ally, and that in 1979 it ultimately “stabbed him in the back.”

https://www.jpost.com/opinion/article-897213

imagine a show or timeline

where a black family

adopts a poor white kid

>>24644506

>>24644505

Dick Butt Kiss