/qresearch/ - Q Research

International Q Research Threads

>>17453586 ————————————–——– Australia #26

>>17722898 ————————————–——– Canada #38

>>16694358 ————————————–——– France #7

>>17595232 ————————————–——– Germany #104

>>17726021 ————————————–——– Japan #8

>>16694250 ————————————–——– Nederland #10

>>17784579 ————————————–——– QAJF #1

>>17352350 ————————————–——– Scotland #8

>>17705335 ————————————–——– South Africa #10

>>17722137 ————————————–——– UK #49

>>17631245 ————————————–——– Vatican #6

GLOBALS

for Anons: bunker = https://endchan.gg/qrbunker; ban lifts >>17241201

Posting guidelines: no naked adults near kids; report violent threats

PROTO Pass information: >>17799211, >>17798916, >>17806389, >>17826144

for Bakers: how to bake/e-bake >>17322493, >>17485628, >>17322317

formatting Q posts: >>17835052, Baker's Lite JS: >>17241444 baking range: @75 up to 751

AFTER 2 breads, pls offer bread to other bakers - req'd after 3, tx. >>17980505, >>18000503 new

No RRN in notables w/o additional sauce >>17980519 new

NOTABLES ARE NOT ENDORSEMENTS

#22086

>>18022849, >>18022855, >>18023111 World Economic Forum Cancels Twitter, Directs Followers to Chinese Social Media Apps

>>18022867 archive offline: Twitter Files #1-11 Downloads (PDF Format)

>>18022868 Non-Profit Focused on Ending Cash Bail Shuts Down After Being Sued for Release of Offender Who Shot Man Days After Being Bailed Out

>>18022899, >>18022904 The China files - warlords of the revolution

>>18022900 Border city El Paso nearing $10M spent in city funds housing, feeding, busing migrants

>>18022908 The incoming New York representative insisted he is “not a criminal” while acknowledging he “embellished” claims about his past

>>18022913, >>18022925 Musk spars with ex-Russian president

>>18022914 A Dem-Linked Dark Money Network Is Quietly Funding The ‘Misinformation’ Research Industry

>>18022922 'Updated' COVID-19 booster shots are being deployed on young children in California

>>18022927, >>18023449 Thomas Renz is leading legal challenges against COVID, and suing on behalf of victims

>>18022933 How Twitter Rigged the Covid Debate

>>18022950, >>18022956, >>18022987 I wondered what country-404 meant besides Ukraine

>>18023000 American officials essentially suggested the elimination of Russia’s leadership, foreign minister Sergey Lavrov has said

>>18023019 Dr. Marty Makary on the release of 'Twitter Files' part 10 and Dr. Anthony Fauci's intent to step down as NIAID director

>>18023028, >>18023038 Boston schools looking into possible temporary mask mandate for 2 weeks after winter break

>>18023039 Haiti Has One of the Lowest COVID-19 Death Rates In the World Despite Administering Zero Vaccine Doses - 'Experts' say: "We Don’t Know"

>>18023046 Christmas aftermath of the protests in Paris described as “largely peaceful” by CBC

>>18023053 Follow these members of the Covid Truth Network that have recently had their Twitter accounts reinstated

>>18023055 That awkward silence in America right now is the vaccinated realizing that they’re getting sick and dying more than the unvaccinated

>>18023058 South Korea ‘lacks’ military readiness – president

>>18023063 Collection of peer reviewed case reports and studies citing adverse effects post COVID vaccination

>>18023065, >>18023069, >>18023071, >>18023115, >>18023127 Perhaps it's time to assume that health research is fraudulent until proven otherwise

>>18023072 Millions of Americans Set to Be Removed From Medicaid After Passage of Omnibus Bill

>>18023078 Moscow responds to Kiev’s ‘peace summit’ idea

>>18023084, >>18023085, >>18023086, >>18023087, >>18023089, >>18023299, >>18023320 Tromethamine is a Hazardous Substance in Jabs that Must be Banned

>>18023090, >>18023182 #Nuremberg2 #DiedSuddenly trending big

>>18023095 Never forget that Anthony Fauci blocked early treatment to generate $98 Billion for the pharmaceutical industry

>>18023105, >>18023183, >>18023524 staffing issues have led to the cancelation of 90% of Sky Harbor Southwest flights

>>18023130 Phase 2 - Ahoy! The Ship Show & Extra Gravy - 12/27/2022 w/ JimW

>>18023180 A Hybrid Craft using an Inertial Mass Modification Device

>>18023192 Schiff said Saturday on KTTA's "The Issue Is" that he is seriously considering running for U.S. Senate

>>18023257 New Alabama conceal carry law goes into effect in 2023

>>18023343 It is hard to understate the levels of dishonesty we witnessed during Covid

>>18023433, >>18023456, >>18023468, >>18023521, >>18023526, >>18023535 Malik Obama Tweets "WW1WGA"

>>18023505 Malik Obama: @KariLake You have my support

>>18023571 #22086

#22085

>>18022018, >>18022046 Did they start a war in Ukraine to hide evidence?

>>18022045, >>18022028, >>18022077, >>18022507 Kash - Move your ass Elon n this Titter Transparency effort

>>18022067 Durham Watch

>>18022071, >>18022168, >>18022216 Suicidal Sweden: Woman Gang-Raped in a Park by Five Teenage Syrian Migrants

>>18022099, >>18022105, >>18022117, >>18022148, >>18022158, >>18022169, >>18022388 Pentagon admits to 46 US-funded biolabs in Ukraine

>>18022176, >>18022192, >>18022206, >>18022215, >>18022293 In-Q-Tel dig

>>18022162, >>18022166, >>18022170, >>18022267 fact sheet on wmd threat reduction efforts with ukraine russia and other

>>18022273, >>18022278, >>18022398, >>18022488, >>18022404, >>18022492, >>18022497, >>18022503 Lori Lightfoots lesbian husband red scarf same as nancy

>>18022277, >>18022280 Why is the Left so obsessed with lying and misleading about the potential threats in the biolabs the US supports in Ukraine?

>>18022299 KASH: And where does biden belong for trucking in millions of illegals - hypocrites

>>18022329, >>18022333, >>18022337 Q3759

>>18022416, >>18022443, >>18022474 Christmas: The Hidden Truth Exposed

>>18022441 The Veil over Society Got Removed for a Moment

>>18022475, >>18022482 Roger Stone T boned

>>18022498, >>18022501 Buffalo plunged into chaos with brazen looters destroying stores as death toll from devastating blizzard rises to at least 27

>>18022502 whoopi says holocaust wasn't so bad since it was white on white killing

>>18022504, >>18022508, >>18022517, >>18022511 dasting iron gibbet cage photo with 3 lights

>>18022506 Polygamist 'Prophet' Caught Transporting Underage Girls in Trailer Charged with Child Abuse

>>18022544 Aussie greens laugh at jab injuries shut down debate about jab mandates

>>18022545, >>18022632, >>18022636, >>18022759 recent DJT truths

>>18022555, >>18022630 HAARP goes active today

>>18022606 the national debt is a rapidly growing death spiral

>>18022628 The WEF are paying influences to manipulate your mind

>>18022631, >>18022635 Elon - Some nights …

>>18022638 CMZ - The Chinese people put up demonstrations and riots to complain about Xi's "Zero Covid" policy which saw them being welded into their homes

>>18022641 Resignations are about to become very common to hear in the news

>>18022659 Bolsonaro will make a nationally broadcast speech today at 7 am ET / 4 am PT

>>18022665, >>18022674 Elon - the Constitution is the most treasured item on my bedside table

>>18022762 Russian government held press conference thursday claiming Hunter Biden helped finance US military ‘bioweapons’ research program in Ukraine

>>18022773 #22085

#22084

>>18021249 a close look at the twitter files by robert gouveia

>>18021256 twitter locked trans woman's acc for tweeting that gender dysphoria is a mental illness

>>18021261, >>18021295, >>18021309, >>18021355 lawfag opine on maricopa judge's opinion

>>18021266 Jesus Would Have Been Branded A Domestic Extremist Today

>>18021286, >>18021308, >>18021393, >>18021771, >>18021790 information is like food, gotta have palatable bites and let it digest

>>18021329 'qanon' live rent free in [their] heads

>>18021338 mrna vaccination the trainwreck of all trainwrecks billions of people stuck with a broken immune response

>>18021372 Discovery of 2-million-year-old DNA in Greenland reveals new details about ancient life

>>18021386 clone wars

>>18021398 notice MSNDC, CNN, ABC, CBS, NBC, etc are the only ones NOT taking about the twitter files

>>18021423, >>18021440, >>18021430, >>18021759 the most crazy eyed preacher in all the land kek

>>18021435, >>18021453 someone hacked Piers Morgan's twitter and is having a lot of fun kek

>>18021459, >>18021488, >>18021500, >>18021502 come off me brow kek

>>18021469 sarah silverman hypocrite

>>18021480 endocrine-disrupting chemical obesogens found in a host of household products

>>18021508 emerald robinson speaks facts

>>18021517 united furniture owner who fired all staff has $24m in real estate assets

>>18021524 hunter crimes laptop report/list

>>18021529 new x22 report

>>18021533, >>18021566, >>18021587 dan ladden-hall dig

>>18021550, >>18021628, >>18021644 red shoe club

>>18021569, >>18021608 Where was god before he said "let there be light"?

>>18021582, >>18021613, >>18021663, >>18021687 from Q927 this vid was "not available" last week

>>18021598 leo terrell to interview DJT live on sean hannity radio show tomorrow from 3 to 6 pm ET / 12 to 3 pm PT

>>18021624 four power substations vandalized in Washington state, over 14K lost power

>>18021642 did a centcom general delay intelligence meant for the president article sept 22 2016

>>18021654, >>18021557, >>18021553, >>18021720, >>18021730 rand paul is sketch

>>18021674 QClock December 26, 2022 Edison and Tesla

>>18021679, >>18021716, >>18021726, >>18021732 why is everyone getting sick?

>>18021689 Bolsonaro's supporters refuse to accept Brazil's election result

>>18021694 No media coverage? Why?

>>18021698, >>18021707 ivory hecker fox houston reporter fired article june 15 2021

>>18021701, >>18021715 dana pe rino

>>18021733 what happens if 44 is actively running a shadow command and control [shadow presidency] operation?

>>18021742, >>18021744, >>18021749 remember this?

>>18021776 63% want FBI's social media activity investigated

>>18021787 Christians face genocide amid rise in persecution in at least 18 countries

>>18021798 practical dietary steps to prevent illness

>>18021823 Q1007

>>18021880 Mel K & Kash Patel We the People Demand the Whole Truth

>>18021884, >>18021888, >>18021905 liberal Christmas art da fuck

>>18021899 Buffalo NY is Collapsing

>>18021901 Pelosi, Fanone, Avenatti

>>18021947 Obama & Emanuel - Members Of Same Chicago Gay Bath House

>>18021964 #22084

#22083

>>18020499, >>18020504 Dave Portnoy is a satanist?

>>18020506 Rand Paul in 2 minutes

>>18020525, >>18020535, >>18020559, >>18020562 Was Putin replaced in 2008?

>>18020526 @RudyGiuliani America's Mayor Live (E46): 2022 - A Year in Review (Pt 1)

>>18020541, >>18020561, >>18020564 For God and Country 1700

>>18020610 baker notes

note-taker

>>18020462, >>18020582 Anons we have some talent up in here

>>18020471 Ukraine accused of ‘extremism’ after demands against Russian skater

>>18020495 List of registered 2024 presidential candidates

>>18020593 Clockfag Reports re: >>18020541

>>18020637 Elon Musk Warns Against Margin Debt on Risk of Market Mass Panic

>>18020654 A federal judge essentially says parents have no rights over their children

>>18020663 New Twitter Files Reveal Troubling Effort to Censor Trump for Encouraging American People About COVID

>>18020677, >>18020749 Puppet Pence unclear who submitted documents under his name to run for president in 2024

>>18020682, >>18020694 HAARP IS ABOUT TO PING AN ASTEROID

>>18020726 Moar Clockfag Reports

>>18020735 New York Governor Declares State Of Emergency, Asks Biden For Federal Declaration

>>18020760 The Transgender Menace It’s not just about other people’s children

>>18020769 Election investigator wins lawsuit over 120k missing voters, Far fewer people registered than ballots counted

>>18020802 Google currently employs at least 165 people, in high-ranking positions, from the Intelligence Community

>>18020812 The Russian MP and oligarch Pavel Antonov has died during a trip to India

>>18020849 The Night Owl News With Dee Stevens & Orlando - 12/26/2022

>>18020875, >>18020893 Oh shit Ted Lieu gets called put by Elon

>>18020897, >>18020901, >>18020927 Ret Col Andrew Milburn: Ukraine is "corrupt, fd-up society" run by "fed-up people"

>>18020918 Shocking VAERS Data Reveals 4070% INCREASE in Miscarriages — Naomi Wolf Interview

>>18020933, >>18020980 #Investors Pulled Record $42B From #StockMarket This Last Week & Another $10B from #BondMarket

>>18020995 Poll: Former President @realDonaldTrump Leads His Potential Opponents By Double-Digits 2024

>>18021026, >>18021033 Does Putin really need another army? Russia's defence minister wants CLONE 3k yr-old warriors

>>18021045 Graphicsfag re >>18021022

>>18021019, >>18021050 Georgia Supreme Court Rules Plaintiffs Have Legal Standing In Counterfeit Ballot Case

>>18021081 Luck a very important word

>>18021609 #22083 Posted in #22084

Previously Collected

>>18018885 #22080, >>18019649 #22081, >>18020387 #22082

>>18016588 #22077, >>18017368 #22078, >>18018121 #22079

>>18014300 #22074-B, >>18015001 #22075, >>18015819 #22076

>>18013007 #22072, >>18013558 #22073, >>18014242 #22074-A

>>18010467 #22069, >>18011218 #22070, >>18012022 #22071

>>18008308 #22066, >>18008866 #22067, >>18009831 #22068

TripCode feed: https://8kun.top/qresearch/tripcode.xml

Aggregators: https://qnotables.com | https://anontimes.com | https://qresear.ch | https://qproofs.com

https://fullchan.net/?4b56874941aae14c#7nw4Cmm1cDRDhq79NzRLVnGHzYaT5GdyyhtwtBsSdJiR

DOUGH

>>18023595

Godamnit

baker seeking handoff

>National Center for Missing and Exploited Children (front)

>Children's Defense Fund (Front)

>Podesta/Alefatis Pizzagate

>Dan Schneider/Pedowood

>Epstein Sex Island/Blackbook

>Pentagon Child Porn Servers

>Oakland County child murders

>Peter Scully Dark Web Child Torturer Live Streamer

>The Franklin Coverup/BoysTown Ring

>Drasius Kedys Pedo Ring

>Chilean Senator Pedo Ring

>North Fox Island Child Killing Ring

>Madeline McCann Disappearance

>Brooke Shields Child Actor

>Cardinal George Pell Vatican Ring

>Colonel Michael Aquino Pedo Cult

>G4S Security Human Trafficking

>Dyncorp Human Trafficking

>Dolphin Square Ring

>Planned Parenthood Organ Trafficking

>Jersey Island Child Killings

>Elm Guest House Ring

>UK Grooming Gang Police Cover up

>Clinton Hitlist

>Clinton Haiti Child Trafficking

>Joe Biden Child Groper

>McMartin Pre-schoolRing

>Presidio Military Daycare Ring

>Dutroux Affair Coverup

>Israeli Resort in Colombia tied to sex trafficking

>NXIVM Sex Cult

>Pennsylvania 300 Priests Pedo Ring

>Sandusky Pedo Ring

>Roman Polanski Scandal

>Jared Fogle "Subway" Pedo Ring

>MJ Scandal

>Savile Scandal

>Oprah's School For Girls Abuse

>JonBenet Photographer Child Abuse Arrest

>The Finders Cult

>Tuam Church Child Mass Grave

>Lanarkshire Orphanage Child Mass Grave

>Dozier School for Boys Child Mass Grave

>Nancy Schaefer CPS Assassination

>Andrew Breitbart Podesta Assassination

>Boko Haram Girls Michelle Obama

>FBI Ted Gunderson exposes child trafficking

>Muslim Child Training Camp Cover up

>Portugal Elite Sex Ring

>Brazil Celebrity Spirit Healer Pedo Ring

>Tucson/Cemex Trafficking Camp

>Italy Foster Care Pedo Ring

>Norway Pedo Ring Bust

>Hampstead, UK, cover up

Nunes: House GOP must subpoena Big Tech Tyrants after Twitter Files revelations

Devin gets pretty spicy and says the FiB will “Rue the Day” they released that statement of “conspiracy theories” to harm the agency. We are not that stupid to believe that! He’s pissed which is unusual for him.

The interviewer John says “the Black Hats and White Hats are going to be clearly fighting now”

Hmm I hear these quotes quite a big lately.

Devin Nunes

December 26, 2022

4,941 Views

>>18023602

handoff confirmed

have a good one

>>18023613

I'm not paying any taxes in the spring. And if they come after me I don't fucking care.

>>18023622

acknowledged

you too

>>18023584

tyb

repost as anon thinks this video is notable

o7

-------—-

GREAT VIDEO - DOCFAGS WILL LIKE - HOW TO TEST, ISOLATE AND CONFIRM A VIRUS.

Note: Detailed explanation to the isolation of a virus aka covid 19. this video should give anons a laymans understanding, it proves that the Covid 19 strain was a lie, they did release a bio - weapon, but without isolating the virus or the bio - weapon, the whole thing was propaganda and the vaccines themselves. A plandemic as stated by many !!

=============

THE LIE COVID-19 "WAS NEVER ISOLATED"

https://www.bitchute.com/video/vynuiiyu7Lxj/

Luck

ckul

cull

>>18023642

Link is LB, sorry

>>18023640

>any decodes for this Kansas COM?

Republicans are part of the problem and need to lose too, Mike.

>>18023640

Unless it's a Bible scripture, there's nothing to "decode". Just theater.

>>18023640

Pompeo is tired and whining

We were cheated out of much of what was Trumps agenda for four years, during which time “they” tried to prevent him from being elected, then inaugurated, and spent the rest of his term trying to remove him from office, and even impeached him AFTER his term, ALL on “Trumped-up” charges.

We were cheated out of effective people being appointed to key positions, due to approval processes, by people who HATE this country.

We were cheated out of several years of the “normalcy” that we had become accustomed to, due to “Covid”, and all of the idiocy that came with it, some of which we are still experiencing.

We were cheated out of the 2020 and 2022 elections, with no help from the courts, the legislatures, or the executive branch, at the federal or state levels.

The military and law enforcement have failed to step up. It is arguable that they would stand against their own sworn oaths of office, if so ordered. They have become a sham.

And the exposure from the Twitter files shows direct involvement of the IC (Intelligence Community - ALL OF THEM) AGAINST We the People and the Constitution.

And now, “they” are trying to prevent him from running again; the best we can expect is more of the same.

We will NOT be able to vote our way out of this mess; nor will we be able to pray our way out; though I caution against giving up either.

IMO, there is NO effective “Constitutional remedy”; nor is there a means for a “redress of grievances”.

We are at the point of the “long train of abuses”, cited in the Declaration of Independence.

>>18023640

https://www.lifenews.com/2022/12/27/florida-abortions-see-massive-decline-more-than-11000-babies-saved-from-abortion/

>>18023647

It looks like an extreme goy

>>18023640

He's gonna run.

==The rise and fall of peer review

Why the greatest scientific experiment in history failed, and why that's a great thing==

Adam Mastroianni

Dec 13

For the last 60 years or so, science has been running an experiment on itself. The experimental design wasn’t great; there was no randomization and no control group. Nobody was in charge, exactly, and nobody was really taking consistent measurements. And yet it was the most massive experiment ever run, and it included every scientist on Earth.

Most of those folks didn’t even realize they were in an experiment. Many of them, including me, weren’t born when the experiment started. If we had noticed what was going on, maybe we would have demanded a basic level of scientific rigor. Maybe nobody objected because the hypothesis seemed so obviously true: science will be better off if we have someone check every paper and reject the ones that don’t pass muster. They called it “peer review.”

This was a massive change. From antiquity to modernity, scientists wrote letters and circulated monographs, and the main barriers stopping them from communicating their findings were the cost of paper, postage, or a printing press, or on rare occasions, the cost of a visit from the Catholic Church. Scientific journals appeared in the 1600s, but they operated more like magazines or newsletters, and their processes of picking articles ranged from “we print whatever we get” to “the editor asks his friend what he thinks” to “the whole society votes.” Sometimes journals couldn’t get enough papers to publish, so editors had to go around begging their friends to submit manuscripts, or fill the space themselves. Scientific publishing remained a hodgepodge for centuries.

(Only one of Einstein’s papers was ever peer-reviewed, by the way, and he was so surprised and upset that he published his paper in a different journal instead.)….

Highly recommend this long article

https://experimentalhistory.substack.com/p/the-rise-and-fall-of-peer-review

Marc Andreessen’s comments on this article. Article is stating why studies don’t work, similar to anons post this am

https://twitter.com/pmarca/status/1607272016293552129?s=20&t=HBais3ayZJKLKtCfOmrBlg

>>18023534 lb

Is this a new way to

Fleece the masses

Safe and effective

>>18023654

>@theRealKiyosaki

>>18023644

Fact. After targeting human trafficking victims online, instead of the traffickers…. after seeing billions go to Nazi Ukraine, I don't want to hear another word about "the lefties" anymore, when 'the righties' are absolutely no better.

Not expecting much from this next congress other than more of the same BS

>>18023668

lizard skin……..

>>18023646

I am ONE born in 78!

>>18023670

great that you fall into the fbi comped bread……….

they now marked you as 78……..

soon it will be another shit, and fall for it, and say your day…………

and so on………

>>18023654

>May be last chance to buy gold and silver at these low prices.

and only for a mere $8/oz over spot on slvr.

ridiculousness

>>18023670

Anon is divinely protected.

78!

>>18023674

Anon is divinely protected.

God please take the wheel because I can't drive for shit lmao

>>18023667

If that is the case, then why is McCarthy pushing so hard, even threatening members of Congress that don't support him, to become Speaker of the House? Seems to me, if he doesn't get the position, and I hope he doesn't, then all HELL is going to break loose.

Do you suppose that Patriot Republicans, Q, and Q don't already have a huge amount of bills already prepared for the new house.

Think about it. First the goal was the Senate. Why? Because then he could appoint judges. So, why the big push for the House this time?

f

[]

f

>>18023605 lb

tis niffa

>check spam folder

>>18023640

He’s a loser and knows it. Insinuating its Trump’s fault, he denied it days later. But its obvious. He will never be president

>>18023665

Left wing, right wing, same bird. The political parties exist to provide the illusion of choice. The foe wears any uniform, identity, or disguise required by the mission. Only those compromised and controllable are promoted to run for political positions.

>>18023629

>>18023656

>>18023671

>>18023676

VictoryStartsHere

17 letters

Tyb for keeping it fresh

>>18023669

He's triggering the lizard skin people, lol

>>18023675

U buying from the wrong place

Try moneymetals, we have had great luck and shipping is fast.

Quantity

Premium/Oz

Total Price Each

1 - 4 bars $3.14 prem $2,740.00

>>18023670

not old, it's a miracle

>>18023660

More

That all changed after World War II.Governments poured funding into research, and they convened “peer reviewers” to ensure they weren’t wasting their money on foolish proposals. That funding turned into a deluge of papers, and journals that previously struggled to fill their pages now struggled to pick which articles to print. Reviewing papers before publication, which was “quite rare” until the 1960s, became much more common. Then it became universal.

Now pretty much every journal uses outside experts to vet papers, and papers that don’t please reviewers get rejected. You can still write to your friends about your findings, but hiring committees and grant agencies act as if the only science that exists is the stuff published in peer-reviewed journals. This is the grand experiment we’ve been running for six decades.

The results are in. It failed.

A WHOLE LOTTA MONEY FOR NOTHIN’

Peer review was a huge, expensive intervention. By one estimate, scientists collectively spend 15,000 years reviewing papers every year. It can take months or years for a paper to wind its way through the review system, which is a big chunk of time when people are trying to do things like cure cancer and stop climate change. And universities fork over millions for access to peer-reviewed journals, even though much of the research is taxpayer-funded, and none of that money goes to the authors or the reviewers.

Huge interventions should have huge effects. If you drop $100 million on a school system, for instance, hopefully it will be clear in the end that you made students better off. If you show up a few years later and you’re like, “hey so how did my $100 million help this school system” and everybody’s like “uhh well we’re not sure it actually did anything and also we’re all really mad at you now,” you’d be really upset and embarrassed. Similarly, if peer review improved science, that should be pretty obvious, and we should be pretty upset and embarrassed if it didn’t.

It didn’t. In all sorts of different fields, research productivity has been flat or declining for decades, and peer review doesn’t seem to have changed that trend. New ideas are failing to displace older ones. Many peer-reviewed findings don’t replicate, and most of them may be straight-up false. When you ask scientists to rate 20th century discoveries in physics, medicine, and chemistry that won Nobel Prizes, they say the ones that came out before peer review are just as good or even better than the ones that came out afterward. In fact, you can’t even ask them to rate the Nobel Prize-winning physics discoveries from the 1990s and 2000s because there aren’t enough of them.

Of course, a lot of other stuff has changed since World War II. We did a terrible job running this experiment, so it’s all confounded. All we can say from these big trends is that we have no idea whether peer review helped, it might have hurt, it cost a ton, and the current state of the scientific literature is pretty abysmal. In this biz, we call this a total flop.

POSTMORTEM

What went wrong?

Here’s a simple question: does peer review actually do the thing it’s supposed to do? Does it catch bad research and prevent it from being published?

It doesn’t. Scientists have run studies where they deliberately add errors to papers, send them out to reviewers, and simply count how many errors the reviewers catch. Reviewers are pretty awful at this. In this study reviewers caught 30% of the major flaws, in this study they caught 25%, and in this study they caught 29%. These were critical issues, like “the paper claims to be a randomized controlled trial but it isn’t” and “when you look at the graphs, it’s pretty clear there’s no effect” and “the authors draw conclusions that are totally unsupported by the data.” Reviewers mostly didn’t notice.

In fact, we’ve got knock-down, real-world data that peer review doesn’t work: fraudulent papers get published all the time. If reviewers were doing their job, we’d hear lots of stories like “Professor Cornelius von Fraud was fired today after trying to submit a fake paper to a scientific journal.” But we never hear stories like that. Instead, pretty much every story about fraud begins with the paper passing review and being published. Only later does some good Samaritan—often someone in the author’s own lab!—notice something weird and decide to investigate. That’s what happened with this this paper about dishonesty that clearly has fake data (ironic), these guys who have published dozens or even hundreds of fraudulent papers, and this debacle:

https://experimentalhistory.substack.com/p/the-rise-and-fall-of-peer-review

>>18023692

was hoping it meant Leavenworth

>>18023702

always been apmex

>>18023683

Is McCarthy deserving of the position thru entitlement?

McCarthy will get the position then throw up road blocks to slow down anyone looking into the truth!

The DOJ will be there to support and luanch investigations on all MAGA reps.

>>18023655

Fake and gay

>>18023696

God protects me fren. Since 78!

>>18023697

Hi Kash!!

>>18023703

No old? 44

>>18023702

>moneymetals

its a buck less than apmex

i'll stick thx

>>18023712

Good.

He must love you much, b/c He gived to you a world full of shit.

And I'm sure that you're poor too.

Trump knows what McCarthy is up to and wants it to happen.

How do tell the public…. You show them

>>18023717

I'll do that to the ones that I love and love me back.

I'll give them shit……………

B/c I'm sure you, for christmas offered shit to the loved ones……………

>>18023584

tyb

>>18023719

like the vax & oz & all the swamp creatures he appointed

great plan

>>18023721

Antiphospholipid antibodies would attack amd destroy cell membranes.

>>18023632

Not gonna happen

>>18023640

Not fit to wipe President Trump's boots. Disgusting excuse who considers himself a religious patriot.

>>18023652

>>18023663

You don't turn a country/people into a machine of communism to fix the problem of a few infiltrators in gov't. You route out the infiltrators. In case anyone has forgotten, communism is bad. I'm not saying Q misspoke, either, but that if you are up against an enemy that's managing the guardrails to predetermined outcomes, you might think that doing something drastic (communism) would be an acceptable "worse case" in order to route out the evil.

Like… just take care of the evil… without tossing out the constitution.

>But muh courts are all corrupt!

Yeah, that happens. Thankfully, we have a better way to resolve this than other countries so we don't have to fall into communism to resolve it.

>>18023686

>Have we unleashed a plague of IgG4-related disease on a subpopulation of humans?

We've been trying to, Anon:

November 1, 2018

Irrational dengue vaccine designs that ignore IgE and IgG4 mediated effects are destined to follow in Dengvaxia's disastrous direction?

Sanofi Pasteur's Dengvaxia is the latest example. Children who received Dengvaxia experienced a higher risk of hospitalization due to a dengue infection. Before that it was Glaxo Smith Kline's Pandemrix vaccine that resulted in the narcolepsy disaster. Vaccine designers designing new vaccines are in no hurry to change. They are making new vaccines without understanding why the Dengvaxia vaccine failed. Thus assuring more disasters to come.

https://zenodo.org/record/1476292#.Y6seftXMLcc

>>18023717

You see shit and I see potential. Power of Positivity!

>>18023640

Boomers love Mike

Stay close to your children, T21214.

>>18023735

ahahahhahahhahhahahhahahhahhahahhahahhahaha

great.

then save us.

please.

>>18023735

Shit in one hand and wish in the other and see which one fills up

>>18023720

>>18023720

>clair·voy·ant(hony)

>>18023738

morn'n gb. habby tot

>>18023741

You are already saved.

>>18023733

in case you haven't noticed, america was turned into international communism a long time ago

taking the wealth of the people through taxes and usury then getting distributed throughout the world by an elitist oligarchy who usurped power when they murdered jfk is international communism

that's just the financial aspect

then you have the cultural aspect in the way they've shaped the culture of america from what it originally was and was meant to be into a globalist dystopia of every kind of degenerate and leech there is

>>18023704

Why don’t reviewers catch basic errors and blatant fraud? One reason is that they almost never look at the data behind the papers they review, which is exactly where the errors and fraud are most likely to be. In fact, most journals don’t require you to make your data public at all. You’re supposed to provide them “on request,” but most people don’t. That’s how we’ve ended up in sitcom-esque situations like ~20% of genetics papers having totally useless data because Excel autocorrected the names of genes into months and years.

(When one editor started asking authors to add their raw data after they submitted a paper to his journal, half of them declined and retracted their submissions. This suggests, in the editor’s words, “a possibility that the raw data did not exist from the beginning.”)

The invention of peer review may have even encouraged bad research. If you try to publish a paper showing that, say, watching puppy videos makes people donate more to charity, and Reviewer 2 says “I will only be impressed if this works for cat videos as well,” you are under extreme pressure to make a cat video study work. Maybe you fudge the numbers a bit, or toss out a few outliers, or test a bunch of cat videos until you find one that works and then you never mention the ones that didn’t. 🎶 Do a little fraud // get a paper published // get down tonight 🎶

PEER REVIEW, WE HARDLY TOOK YE SERIOUSLY

Here’s another way that we can test whether peer review worked: did it actually earn scientists' trust?

Scientists often say they take peer review very seriously. But people say lots of things they don’t mean, like “It’s great to e-meet you” and “I’ll never leave you, Adam.” If you look at what scientists actually do, it’s clear they don’t think peer review really matters.

First: if scientists cared a lot about peer review, when their papers got reviewed and rejected, they would listen to the feedback, do more experiments, rewrite the paper, etc. Instead, they usually just submit the same paper to another journal. This was one of the first things I learned as a young psychologist, when my undergrad advisor explained there is a “big stochastic element” in publishing (translation: “it’s random, dude”). If the first journal didn’t work out, we’d try the next one. Publishing is like winning the lottery, she told me, and the way to win is to keep stuffing the box with tickets. When very serious and successful scientists proclaim that your supposed system of scientific fact-checking is no better than chance, that’s pretty dismal.

Second: once a paper gets published, we shred the reviews. A few journals publish reviews; most don't. Nobody cares to find out what the reviewers said or how the authors edited their paper in response, which suggests that nobody thinks the reviews actually mattered in the first place.

And third: scientists take unreviewed work seriously without thinking twice. We read “preprints” and working papers and blog posts, none of which have been published in peer-reviewed journals. We use data from Pew and Gallup and the government, also unreviewed. We go to conferences where people give talks about unvetted projects, and we do not turn to each other and say, “So interesting! I can’t wait for it to be peer reviewed so I can find out if it’s true.”

Instead, scientists tacitly agree that peer review adds nothing, and they make up their minds about scientific work by looking at the methods and results. Sometimes people say the quiet part loud, like Nobel laureate Sydney Brenner:

I don’t believe in peer review because I think it’s very distorted and as I’ve said, it’s simply a regression to the mean.I think peer review is hindering science. In fact, I think it has become a completely corrupt system.

https://experimentalhistory.substack.com/p/the-rise-and-fall-of-peer-review

The plan is only to show the world all evil that's all around you….

The action part is up to you.

The choice is yours

>>18023743

Belief

>>18023750

I don't give a fuck about me!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I am here for a reason!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

The PLANET!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

>>18023755

I love Mother Earth. ❤️

>>18023761

>>18023752

CAN WE FIX IT? NO WE CAN'T

I used to think about all the ways we could improve peer review. Reviewers should look at the data! Journals should make sure that papers aren’t fraudulent!

It’s easy to imagine how things could be better—my friend Ethan and I wrote a whole paper on it—but that doesn’t mean it’s easy to make things better. My complaints about peer review were a bit like looking at the ~35,000 Americans who die in car crashes every year and saying “people shouldn’t crash their cars so much.” Okay, but how?

Lack of effort isn’t the problem: remember that our current system requires 15,000 years of labor every year, and it still does a really crappy job. Paying peer reviewers doesn’t seem to make them any better. Neither does training them. Maybe we can fix some things on the margins, but remember that right now we’re publishing papers that use capital T’s instead of error bars, so we’ve got a long, long way to go.

What if we made peer review way stricter? That might sound great, but it would make lots of other problems with peer review way worse.

For example, you used to be able to write a scientific paper with style. Now, in order to please reviewers, you have to write it like a legal contract. Papers used to begin like, “Help! A mysterious number is persecuting me,” and now they begin like, “Humans have been said, at various times and places, to exist, and even to have several qualities, or dimensions, or things that are true about them, but of course this needs further study (Smergdorf & Blugensnout, 1978; Stikkiwikket, 2002; von Fraud et al., 2018b)”.

This blows. And as a result, nobody actually reads these papers. Some of them are like 100 pages long with another 200 pages of supplemental information, and all of it is written like it hates you and wants you to stop reading immediately. Recently, a friend asked me when I last read a paper from beginning to end; I couldn’t remember, and neither could he. “Whenever someone tells me they loved my paper,” he said, “I say thank you, even though I know they didn’t read it.” Stricter peer review would mean even more boring papers, which means even fewer people would read them.

Making peer review harsher would also exacerbate the worst problem of all: just knowing that your ideas won’t count for anything unless peer reviewers like them makes you worse at thinking. It’s like being a teenager again: before you do anything, you ask yourself, “BUT WILL PEOPLE THINK I’M COOL?” When getting and keeping a job depends on producing popular ideas, you can get very good at thought-policing yourself into never entertaining anything weird or unpopular at all. That means we end up with fewer revolutionary ideas, and unless you think everything’s pretty much perfect right now, we need revolutionary ideas real bad.

On the off chance you do figure out a way to improve peer review without also making it worse, you can try convincing the nearly 30,000 scientific journals in existence to apply your magical method to the ~4.7 million articles they publish every year. Good luck!

PEER REVIEW IS WORSE THAN NOTHING; OR, WHY IT AIN’T ENOUGH TO SNIFF THE BEEF

Peer review doesn’t work and there’s probably no way to fix it. But a little bit of vetting is better than none at all, right?

I say: no way.

https://experimentalhistory.substack.com/p/the-rise-and-fall-of-peer-review

>>18023725

Thank you for the advice, I really appreciate it

AWG

2-23-78

Peace be with you!

>>18023620

>>18023620

Normies don't know who Mark Levin is, let alone care what his opinion is.

>>18023764

I say: no way.

Imagine you discover that the Food and Drug Administration’s method of “inspecting” beef is just sending some guy (“Gary”) around to sniff the beef and say whether it smells okay or not, and the beef that passes the sniff test gets a sticker that says “INSPECTED BY THE FDA.” You’d be pretty angry. Yes, Gary may find a few batches of bad beef, but obviously he’s going to miss most of the dangerous meat. This extremely bad system is worse than nothing because it fools people into thinking they’re safe when they’re not.

That’s what our current system of peer review does, and it’s dangerous. That debunked theory about vaccines causing autism comes from a peer-reviewed paper in one of the most prestigious journals in the world, and it stayed there for twelve years before it was retracted. How many kids haven’t gotten their shots because one rotten paper made it through peer review and got stamped with the scientific seal of approval?

If you want to sell a bottle of vitamin C pills in America, you have to include a disclaimer that says none of the claims on the bottle have been evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration. Maybe journals should stamp a similar statement on every paper: “NOBODY HAS REALLY CHECKED WHETHER THIS PAPER IS TRUE OR NOT. IT MIGHT BE MADE UP, FOR ALL WE KNOW.” That would at least give people the appropriate level of confidence.

SCIENCE MUST BE FREE

Why did peer review seem so reasonable in the first place?

I think we had the wrong model of how science works. We treated science like it’s a weak-link problem where progress depends on the quality of our worst work. If you believe in weak-link science, you think it’s very important to stamp out untrue ideas—ideally, prevent them from being published in the first place. You don’t mind if you whack a few good ideas in the process, because it’s so important to bury the bad stuff.

But science is a strong-link problem: progress depends on the quality of our best work. Better ideas don’t always triumph immediately, but they do triumph eventually, because they’re more useful. You can’t land on the moon using Aristotle’s physics, you can’t turn mud into frogs using spontaneous generation, and you can’t build bombs out of phlogiston. Newton’s laws of physics stuck around; his recipe for the Philosopher’s Stone didn’t. We didn’t need a scientific establishment to smother the wrong ideas. We needed it to let new ideas challenge old ones, and time did the rest.

If you’ve got weak-link worries, I totally get it. If we let people say whatever they want, they will sometimes say untrue things, and that sounds scary. But we don’t actually prevent people from saying untrue things right now; we just pretend to. In fact, right now we occasionally bless untrue things with big stickers that say “INSPECTED BY A FANCY JOURNAL,” and those stickers are very hard to get off. That’s way scarier.

Weak-link thinking makes scientific censorship seem reasonable, but all censorship does is make old ideas harder to defeat. Remember that it used to be obviously true that the Earth is the center of the universe, and if scientific journals had existed in Copernicus’ time, geocentrist reviewers would have rejected his paper and patted themselves on the back for preventing the spread of misinformation. Eugenics used to be hot stuff in science—do you think a bunch of racists would give the green light to a paper showing that Black people are just as smart as white people? Or any paper at all by a Black author? (And if you think that’s ancient history: this dynamic is still playing out today.) We still don’t understand basic truths about the universe, and many ideas we believe today will one day be debunked. Peer review, like every form of censorship, merely slows down truth.

https://experimentalhistory.substack.com/p/the-rise-and-fall-of-peer-review

>>18023640

Landing

>>18023759

no, you are just a fucking freak

>>18023770

HOORAY WE FAILED

Nobody was in charge of our peer review experiment, which means nobody has the responsibility of saying when it’s over. Seeing no one else, I guess I’ll do it:

We’re done, everybody! Champagne all around! Great work, and congratulations. We tried peer review and it didn’t work.

Honesty, I’m so relieved. That system sucked! Waiting months just to hear that an editor didn’t think your paper deserved to be reviewed? Reading long walls of text from reviewers who for some reason thought your paper was the source of all evil in the universe? Spending a whole day emailing a journal begging them to let you use the word “years” instead of always abbreviating it to “y” for no reason (this literally happened to me)? We never have to do any of that ever again.

I know we all might be a little disappointed we wasted so much time, but there's no shame in a failed experiment. Yes, we should have taken peer review for a test run before we made it universal. But that’s okay—it seemed like a good idea at the time, and now we know it wasn’t. That’s science! It will always be important for scientists to comment on each other’s ideas, of course. It’s just this particular way of doing it that didn’t work.

What should we do now? Well, last month I published a paper, by which I mean I uploaded a PDF to the internet. I wrote it in normal language so anyone could understand it. I held nothing back—I even admitted that I forgot why I ran one of the studies. I put jokes in it because nobody could tell me not to. I uploaded all the materials, data, and code where everybody could see them. I figured I’d look like a total dummy and nobody would pay any attention, but at least I was having fun and doing what I thought was right.

Then, before I even told anyone about the paper, thousands of people found it, commented on it, and retweeted it.

Total strangers emailed me thoughtful reviews. Tenured professors sent me ideas. NPR asked for an interview. The paper now has more views than the last peer-reviewed paper I published, which was in the prestigious Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. And I have a hunch far more people read this new paper all the way to the end, because the final few paragraphs got a lot of comments in particular. So I dunno, I guess that seems like a good way of doing it?

I don’t know what the future of science looks like. Maybe we’ll make interactive papers in the metaverse or we’ll download datasets into our heads or whisper our findings to each other on the dance floor of techno-raves. Whatever it is, it’ll be a lot better than what we’ve been doing for the past sixty years. And to get there, all we have to do is what we do best: experiment.

https://experimentalhistory.substack.com/p/the-rise-and-fall-of-peer-review

>>18023039 (pb)

in 2012, Haiti revised its malaria diagnosis and treatment guidelines, adding recommendations to confirm all cases of suspected malaria by a parasitological diagnostic test and to include a single dose of primaquine (0.75 mg/kg) in combination with standard chloroquine therapy (25 mg/kg total, administered over 3 days) for treatment of all confirmed malaria cases.

https://www.cdc.gov/malaria/new_info/2010/malaria_in_haiti_rec_pandt.html

>>18023770

topkek

>Imagine you discover that the Food and Drug Administration’s method of “inspecting” beef is just sendingsome guy (“Gary”)around to sniff the beef

The plan to control the matrix

escape from the matrix

Where to go it is one matrix

>>18023773

Wrong. Q said they have total control

>>18023769

This is why Tesla stock is in the dirt. People are starting to figure out battery power doesn't square with the unicorns and sparklers the media has been pumping. Just like solar panels (toxic waste) and wind generators (power shortages), battery operated vehicles pollute the environment (batteries) 100x more and are 2x the price of a comparable gas automobile (even with federal subsidies). Tesla is in dead cat bounce territory.

Do you think our new White Hat controllers will be different than the current Invisible controllers?

Do you think you will get 40% truth?

>>18023784

the fifth dimension is the same as all higher dimensions: the twist to the axis isin, and out.

it will always be the path to the higher dimension

"go within"

kinda neat

heard this from a rapper few weeks ago

>>18023778

Most people have no clue and never will

>>18023765

>>18023725

>Thank you for the advice, I really appreciate it

victim status noted

it wasnt advice, it was counters to your false post

the longer you make excuses for DJTs bad judgements, the longer he will do them.

him endorsing mccarthy was cowardice or worse

he could have endorsed jordan or someone else and save the day

and how many people that were Trump fans got the vax because he endorsed it?

quit excusing him and do whats right

>>18023785

She don't know that! [They] all think there's still a chance they'll win the battle.

>>18023783

>Food and Drug Administration’s method of “inspecting” beef

first, it's USDA.

2nd, no sniffers for you

1 sniff per 3 years, is good enough for you

>>18023768

HANNITY calls Levin “The Great One”.

Nigga, PLEASE!>>18023768

>>18023640

He's right you know!

>>18023768

> let alone care what his opinion is

David Zweig with the limited hangout headline.

Should read:

How the FBI/CDC/US Government used twitter to rig the Covid Debate

PB

>>18022933 How Twitter Rigged the Covid Debate

>>18023799

Well the MSM narrative still fucking sucks ass. So there's that

>>18023620

This isn't any different than all the other "puppet" presidencies we've had, just more obvious.

>>18023774

really gotta hit the bulk by to save bucks.

always bought in small increments.

complain nao but when it hits 500 i'll be like ….damn!

Jesus Calls His First Disciples

5 One day as Jesus was standing by the Lake of Gennesaret,[a] the people were crowding around him and listening to the word of God. 2 He saw at the water’s edge two boats, left there by the fishermen, who were washing their nets. 3 He got into one of the boats, the one belonging to Simon, and asked him to put out a little from shore. Then he sat down and taught the people from the boat.

4 When he had finished speaking, he said to Simon, “Put out into deep water, and let down the nets for a catch.”

5 Simon answered, “Master, we’ve worked hard all night and haven’t caught anything. But because you say so, I will let down the nets.”

6 When they had done so, they caught such a large number of fish that their nets began to break. 7 So they signaled their partners in the other boat to come and help them, and they came and filled both boats so full that they began to sink.

8 When Simon Peter saw this, he fell at Jesus’ knees and said, “Go away from me, Lord; I am a sinful man!” 9 For he and all his companions were astonished at the catch of fish they had taken, 10 and so were James and John, the sons of Zebedee, Simon’s partners.

Then Jesus said to Simon, “Don’t be afraid; from now on you will fish for people.” 11 So they pulled their boats up on shore, left everything and followed him.

Never give up and believe in the word of the master anons, its hard but not impossible! Faith is indomitable

https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=luke 5&version=NIV

>>18023802

Wu Han's an old friend

>>18023814

Luke Chapter 5

If the White hats now control the cures, will you be upset that they are withholding them from we the sheeple?

How many need to suffer and die so that we learn a lesson?

I am living with someone dying and to know it could have been avoided will be unforgivable.

UNFORGIVABLE

HEAR THESE WORDS

UNFORGIVABLE

>>18023797

>2nd, no sniffers for you

>1 sniff per 3 years, is good enough for you

no sniff for you one year! /soupnazi

>>18023820

(Knowingly) needs to go both ways

>>18023800

>Levin

can't listen to that voice. can't get 30 sec into his monologue b4 i pull tha cord

>>18023793

>all guud on yer end? fam guud?

yes-they send greetings as well and as good as can be

Hard to be here at times (med shitz) but here for short periods nao so that helps muh 'head'.

Why is Russia in bed with China who's in bed with WEF?

Not all is what it seems….

>>18023827

>(Knowingly) needs to go both ways

>>18023769

should have bought a Lada Niva

They argue whether the Earth is spherical or flat

They should not talk about extraterrestrials

>>18023790

>>18023820

Pretty good guess all of their loved ones are healthy

>>18023832

Why is USA in bed with Israel/UK who´s in bed with WEF?

>Not all is what it seems…

>>18023755

When you do crimes, and no one it is punishing you, what you'll do next?

Stop?

ahahahahhahahhahahhahahahhahahahhahahahhahaha

You'll do moar crimes, and come to the crimes your family, friends, then friends of friends and so on, till you destroy a world.

So………where's God??????????

>>18023789

They are not white hats and they will be worse than before. It always gets worse the more nothing is done about it.

>>18023825

It is no coincidence that Elon Musk is dropping evidence that the FBI colluded to fix the 2020 election RIGHT before the Brunson case is to be heard by the Supreme Court, which alleges that Congress did nothing to investigate collusion to fix the 2020 election; thereby, engaging intreason

>>18023773

So we have fake doctor running the country, great! Its really Obama and Rice, this a shit show and they are getting away with it

There should be the number of the bread at the end. Not a link, but the number of the bread along side of the menu at the bottom.

>>18023794

>victim status noted

Perp status noted

Daily reminder. Patriots are safe. Except for you.

>>18023851

Wouldn't be surprised if Trump was really the last president because “they” are trying to introduce the gov is now run by committee

>>18023584

Baker,Notablebelow; anon took a stab at a title:

>>18023752, >>18023764, >>18023770 The Rise and Fall of Peer Review, excellent article on false positive ratings (with Gary the beef inspector kek)

>>18023846

Question:

IF the SC rules in favor of Brunson and by some miracle Congress and Biden admin are removed, who performs the functions of Congress in their places? Who will be acting president and VP?

Humor me instead of "not gonna happen"s, pls.

>>18023846

That's a LOT of faith to put into our current SC. At this stage, we know they are compromised as well, much more likely to ignore and give a pass anyhow.

UNLESS they decide to refer or hand to a military court.

Just a thought

>>18023853

OK Karen, we'll get right on that.

>>18023843

If you know crimes, and you are silence, you are complicit in front of a judge????????????????

A correct one………not those shit corrupt……………..

So what complicit one deserve in a case of rape, torture, kill for satan deserve?

>>18023810

ALL MEDIA SUCKS ASS.

So there's that.

No idea where the traffickers are but they sure know where all the victims are.

>>18023864

exited. kek

>>18023852

been a stacker when convenient over the years with a sole purpose of barter or buy. always bought in 1oz increments for easy transfer.

may grab a few moar b4 shtf and only richy rich can afford it.

guud to see you teaching your son well.

o7

>>18023870

So you have it, your god.

>>18023867

Ok lesbian.

>>18023783

There are “Gary’s” placed everywhere