[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / random / alleycat / cow / grass / hkacade / hkpnd / lewd / nanj / utd ]

/qresearch/ - Q Research

Research and discussion about Q's crumbs
Name
Email
Subject
REC
STOP
Comment *
TOTP * Download Authenticator: IOS | Android | Browser Extension
File
Password / Authenticator Key *
 get code / The key/code can be used in the authenticator app and when deleting your post.
Archive
* = required field[▶ Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.
Embed
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Options

Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webp, webm, mp4, mov, pdf
Max filesize is 16 MB.
Max image dimensions are 15000 x 15000.
You may upload 5 per post.


Welcome Page | Index | Archive | Q Posts | Q Proofs
Q's Board: /projectdcomms/ | Legacy Boards: /CBTS/ /TheStorm/ /GreatAwakening/ | TOR access: TOR link

File: 25de0f65a60b18d⋯.png (7.45 KB, 1024x512, 2:1, 68cdrlhal0hz.png)

3da09c  No.16689629 [Last 50 Posts]

Welcome to UK Q Research

This is where UK Anons research the UK's role in the Great Awakening and expose the evil we find on our shores. The UK Anons here are dedicated and meticulous researchers and are often over the target, because of this the UK breads have been visited by Q and we are also often under heavy bombardment from shills. If you are new here take some time to lurk to understand the board and then feel free to participate, if anyone attacks you they are likely paid shills who try to deter you from posting - ignore them.

Topics of particular interest to the UK Anons that you may find posted here are: Research into the UK Pics Q posted, Spygate drama, Brexit issues, Covid and vaxx news and data and any relevant news articles from the Fake and Real news outlets.

Our population is largely still asleep and sleepwalking to the precipice, we need to wake as many as possible and be prepared for a mass awakening, because as we know, NOTHING CAN STOP WHAT IS COMING. NOTHING.

WWG1WGA WW!

Q Proofs & Welcome

Welcome to Q Research (README FIRST, THEN PROCEED TO LURK) https://8kun.top/qresearch/welcome.html

Q: The Basics - An Introduction to Q and the Great Awakening

PDF: https://8kun.top/qresearch/res/3082784.html#3082809

PICS: https://8kun.top/qresearch/res/3082784.html#3082821

PDF & PICS Archive: >>>/comms/3196

100+ Q Proof Graphics qproofs.com

Q's Private Board >>>/projectdcomms/ & Q's Trip-code: Q !!Hs1Jq13jV6

Those still on the board — https://8kun.top/qresearch/qposts.html or >>>/comms/226

All Q's posts, archived at - qanon.app (qanon.pub) , qanon.news , qposts.online

Dealing with Clowns & Shills

>>2322789, >>2323031 How To Quickly Spot A Clown

Q's Latest Posts to UKQR

Tuesday 08.12.2020 (Q's last post before going dark)

https://8kun.top/qresearch/res/11709084.html#11953143

____________________________
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

3da09c  No.16689666

Notables are NOT Endorsements

#46

>>16668639, >>16670385 St Thomas' Hospital East Wing project, London

>>16669651 Streetview pics looking South over Lambeth Bridge

>>16669693, >>16669708, >>16669728 Pics taken on the Thames showing Albert Embankment

>>16669791, >>16669800, >>16669827, >>16669858 The Corniche, 21 Albert Embankment, London, SE1 7TJ

>>16669916 SV-Aug-2013-P Albert Embankment. Same date as riverwall sign pic. Same date as yellow bike pic at CH

>>16670071, >>16670105, >>16670153, >>16670221 Crowne Plaza Hotel, Albert Embankment

>>16670250 Example of crane boom period AFTER winter 2013/2014

>>16670268, >>16670286, >>16670365 ROT1 Q pic view, building of interest in the distance beyond trees

>>16670310, >>16670322 Links to SV-SEP-2012-P and SV-JUN-2014-P, Albert Embankment

>>16670376 SV-AUG-2013-P Crane activity. 3 Cranes present. What are the chances that these cranes were tken down before the winter 2013/2014 Q pics?

>>16670377, >>16670473, >>16670542 Building with coloured floodlights next to Park Plaza County Hall London eliminated

>>16670413 More cranes above Albert Embankment

>>16670426 Comparison pics from Hungerford Bridge: July 2014 (day) and ROT1 (night)

>>16670513 Caps frp, vid showed how very dark the TATT was even when traffic was very heavy, as the recording heads down Albert Embankment it captured a full on view of the hotel's coloured lights

>>16670685, >>16671746, , >>16671830, >>16671975, , >>16672001, >>16676855 St. Thomas Hospital in the running?

>>16670612 From QR General: Boris Johnson's newly-appointed chancellor Nadhim Zahawi calls on the prime minister to resign. And UK Education Secretary Michelle Donelan, appointed 36 hours ago, resigns from government

>>16671774 Westminster pics 2017

#45

>>16423993 UK Notables now downloadable!

>>16426814 Two British soldiers sentenced to death in Donetsk

>>16433178 Majority of UK’s 366 monkeypox cases are in London, says health agency

>>16433225 Third Unaoil bribery offender launches London appeal against conviction

>>16433701 Ghislaine Maxwell will ask to be transferred to a British prison to serve the bulk of her sentence for child sex trafficking, The Mail on Sunday understands.

>>16435903 4 year Delta Julian Assange

>>16439413 NHS trust in England has spent over £50,000 awarding medals to itself

>>16440258 Excellent Neil Oliver video - Are we stupid?

>>16448129 Ex-police officer jailed in UK for posting memes of George Floyd in Whatsapp & Facebook group chats

>>16454986 Silent heart condition predicted to kill 40,000 Brits over next five years

>>16465455 2013 article about Lockerbie: Ex-FBI chief Robert Mueller says 'others will be charged'

>>16475130 Boris and Carrie Johnson Forced the Media to Memory Hole an Article About Their Latest Scandal

>>16497951 Anguish of young man who had sex organs removed on NHS

>>16498230 Two people charged with conspiracy offences linked to allegations of organ harvesting

>>16508140 Q's Latest Posts

>>16539038 Covid, Monkey Pox Bun

>>16539041 Embankment Bun

>>16539044 Piccadilly Bun

>>16539046 Red Buses Bun

>>16539056 Other bakers Notabes

>>16589996 ‘WE ARE ATTACKING PAKISTAN!’ – Hackers Take over Official British Army Twitter Account

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

3da09c  No.16689682

Baker message

Yet another spam attack by the Deep State minions, all other tactics having failed miserably.

The last bread had anons beginning the quest to identify the purple-lit building at the Albert Embankment in London. More pieces of the puzzle await in what has become an incredible dig. The spammers may return. Bakers will do another bread and anons of the UK will keep on digging.

Please post all of the following

ANYTHING Rothschild, Soros or Payseur, UK Media Bias, UK Media Q pieces (Good or bad), Evidence of corrupted and controlled persons in the UK or European public eye. Notable DEATHS, Notable RESIGNATIONS, All things ROYAL, MP's Doing Good and Bad things, Anything MI5/MI6/GCHQ related, Paedophile ring intel and of course SYMBOLISM wherever you see it We need to start keeping an eye out for Christopher Steele and what this cretin is up to. We also need some UK Planefags and Boatfags to keep an eye on the skies and water.

Useful Bakery Ingredients

Q Aggregator Sites:

Q Alerts (with desktop notifications) https://qalerts.pub/

Qanon.pub https://qanon.pub/

Qanon.news https://qanon.news/

Qposts online https://qposts.online/

Q Research sites:

https://q-resear.ch/

https://www.qproofs.com/

Telegram Channels

We The Media https://t.me/WeTheMedia

BakesCorp(highlighs of posts here by UKBaker)https://t.me/BakesCorp

Lin Wood https://t.me/linwoodspeakstruth

General Michael Flynn https://t.me/GenMichaelFlynn

General McInerney https://t.me/GeneralMcInerney

Karaken Wood https://t.me/RealKrakenWood

Jordan Sather https://t.me/jordansather

InevetableET https://t.me/InevitableET

CodeMonkeyZ https://t.me/CodeMonkeyZ

Jim Watkins https://t.me/jim_watkins

Alex Thomson https://t.me/EastApp

Alistair Williamshttps://t.me/alistairwilliams

The White Rose https://t.me/JoinTheWhiteRoas

Q Video Channels:

JoeM Bitchute https://www.bitchute.com/channel/50tnZ2hx6duU/ Rumble Not Yet

In Pursuit of Truth Bitchute https://www.bitchute.com/channel/Xe2ztraIRXRX/ Rumble Not Yet

SGT Report Bitchute https://www.bitchute.com/channel/nLPcg68RnP97/ Rumble https://rumble.com/c/c-297721

And We Know Bitchute https://www.bitchute.com/channel/1uDxpDogKMs9/ Rumble https://rumble.com/c/AndWeKnow

Praying Medic Bitchute https://www.bitchute.com/channel/FJLej1ou6JVe/ Rumble https://rumble.com/c/PrayingMedic

JustInformedTalk Bitchute https://www.bitchute.com/channel/zWqrqKTLkhqW/ Rumble https://rumble.com/c/JustInformedTalk

Destroying the Illusion Bitchute https://www.bitchute.com/channel/XyIkC2xqtFHY/ Rumble https://rumble.com/c/c-295521

X22 Report Bitchute https://www.bitchute.com/channel/n78PbEkvWx2g/ Rumble https://rumble.com/c/X22Report

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

3da09c  No.16689693

Other Dedicated Research Threads

>>16407560 Clockwork Qrange #16

>>>/warroom/ Warroom Operations

>>>/midnightriders/ Midnight Riders board

>>>/qrb/ QRB (Alternative to main QRB)

>>>/deepdigs/ Deep Digs

>>>/qrb/13005 Planefagging 101 Q&A

>>>/qrb/42185 Boatfagging Q&A

International Q Research Threads

To be Updated

Useful Links

Wayback Machine for old archived websites https://web.archive.org

Tin Eye to find original posting date and source of pics https://tineye.com/

Free Translator https://www.collinsdictionary.com/translator

Banned YouTube Channels Archive https://www.altcensored.com/channel/deleted

National Archives Discovery https://discovery.nationalarchives.gov.uk/

Westminster Planning Applications https://idoxpa.westminster.gov.uk/online-applications/

Absolute Proof - Election Fraud documentary https://rumble.com/vdkz6j-absolute-proof-with-mike-lindell.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

3da09c  No.16689704

UK Pics Background and SitRep

Embankment Pictures

On February 16th 2018 Q posted a picture from a London Traffic Cam by Embankment Staion [https://qalerts.pub/?n=784], the image was of London traffic and Big Ben. The File Name of the picture was NSA_Traf_CAM_LONDON2847.png. 9 minutes later Q posted a stringer warning to the UK of a possible car attack.

3 Months later on May 20th 2018 Q posted a series of 3 pictures [https://qalerts.pub/?n=1423] from the same traffic camera which was rotated through 3 positions. Q was telling us this camera has a field of view from the Corinthia hotel and up the Victoria Embankment towards Parliament.

2 months later on the 27th of July 2018 Q reposted one of the previous pictures with people circled [https://qalerts.pub/?n=1720], this was tentatively identified as Lisa Page, lover of disgraced traitor and FBI goon Peter Strzok.

Q revists the theme again on February the 18th 2019 when Q posts 3 more pictures of the Corinthia hotel from the same camera [https://qalerts.pub/?n=2797] indicating that the couple may have been staying there.

17th May 2018 Pictures

On the 17th of May Q posted a series of pictures from two locations in London and several locations in China, there is likely a connection between the two. An anon posted a theory which Q quoted indicating that the theory was on the right lines. The China pics were of pallets of boxed technology (possibly secure satellite phones that operate on a Chinese satellite), the Foxconn factory and an airport with a Chinese plane at a gate. The theory suggested that China were supplying secure communication devices to the cabal so that they could communicate without sigint (Signals Intercept) by the NSA. The London connection is through Lisa Page and Peter Strzok, the lovers were secretly in London (perhaps arriving by boat on the Thames to avoid official record of the visit) and being surveilled by the Q team the whole time. The theory stated they were either collecting or distributing these communication devices for other cabal members, Q also posted a picture from the plane and an Owl and the Space Shuttle.

Piccadilly Circus Pictures https://qalerts.pub/?n=1405

In post 1405, which is the first of the 17th of May series, Q posted a picture of a red London Routemaster bus, Q also posted a Winter Wonderland picture of 2 peoples legs, The Red Bus picture was titled Fsurv_londonps1.png, Presumably someone in the picture is of interest, its likely this picture was posted to inform the person who is being surveilled that they were being watched. The following post [https://qalerts.pub/?n=1406] contained two more pictures from Piccadilly circus. The picture is of a road sign and the Cool Britannia giftshop. The Cool Britannia giftshop has similar archways to that of the temple on Epstein Island and the Aleppo Bathhouse Hammam Yalbugha.

Winter Wonderland Pictures

Q posted the first Winter Wonderland picture of 2 peoples legs on the plastic flooring at Winter Wonderland, A second picture of the Wilde Maus Roller-coaster was posted about a month later [https://qalerts.pub/?n=1456]

Black Box

The Black Box Pic was posted by Q on the 27th Of July 2018 [https://qalerts.pub/?n=1725] in Reply to the WARNING Stay alert post back in February 2018.

Anons found the black box stands alongside bus shelter 'S' by Westminster Abbey in London. Its precise location is outside No 4 Victoria street. No 4 Victoria Street used to have a branch of the corrupt HSBC bank and Anons found out it is the home of the National Iranian Oil Company (NIOC House). Other tenants of the building seem to have links to Iran. The building across the street from the black box is the Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy.

The black box is about a 11 minute walk from Thames House, the home of the Security Service [MI5] and a 23 minute walk from the Secret Intelligence Service [MI6]. Q's Picture of the box featured a Qanon sticker with a White Rabbit, the text said "The Storm is Coming". Subsequent pictures of the box always shows that lots of stickers have been put on the box, it seems to be a popular "Slap Tagging" location but Anons think this could be a form of discreet communication either by White Hats or Black Hats. A recent visit to the box by an anon shows the box in desperate need of repainting because it has been constantly scrubbed clean by street cleaners indicating a massive amount of stickers has been put on the box in the last 2 years.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

3da09c  No.16689720

HOW TO FILTER OUT NUISANCE SHILLS AND SPAMMERS

Shills and spammers [like Jon James Pratt] clutter up the bread, you can easily filter them out so that they disappear, you may have to do this a few times, but it is well worth it.

Follow these simple instructions:

Click on the small triangle next to the posters name - Add Filter - ID

DONE!

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

3da09c  No.16689751

File: 78d56e5fa5977d5⋯.jpeg (37.6 KB, 420x315, 4:3, 78d56e5fa5977d50c329b09cb….jpeg)

Dough

https://controlc.com/314bb592

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

3da09c  No.16689860

File: b224c6361e4c715⋯.png (470.84 KB, 1576x884, 394:221, b224c6361e4c715e9590ec1841….png)

ONE OF THE COMPANIES INVOLVED IN THE SPAM ATTACK IS NAMED "AUTOMATTIC" (TWO T'S) AND HAS SEVERAL OFFICES, THE ONE IDENTIFIED ATTACKING IP IS FROM THE OFFICE IN LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA.

Remember that name if choosing an internet services company in the future. Automattic

PASS THE WORD, THIS COMPANY THAT WORKS WITH WORDPRESS PLAYS DIRTY POLITICALLY MOTIVATED TRICKS

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

3da09c  No.16695651

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

I'm thinking our purple building is this luxury place "The Dumont" on Albert Embankment.

The video from time 1:34 onward makes it appear to me the building sticks out further than its neighbours and looks like a good match for the rough bearing we have

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

3da09c  No.16695655

File: 9e1b51d08c643a5⋯.png (1.03 MB, 1920x947, 1920:947, Screenshot_2022_07_09_at_0….png)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

3da09c  No.16695851

File: 7f6babd87730596⋯.jpg (945.92 KB, 4032x3024, 4:3, m8dp7jr9our01.jpg)

File: 8b1b977fec1826a⋯.jpg (320.44 KB, 1152x769, 1152:769, JasonHawkes_6263_xgaplus.jpg)

File: 9608cc2452bb2cd⋯.png (409.78 KB, 608x419, 608:419, view_of_vauxhall_london_by….png)

File: 8aaad73ecb1374e⋯.png (1.71 MB, 1920x947, 1920:947, Screenshot_2022_07_09_at_0….png)

Here we go. A purple building sitting in Vauxhall next to (just to North of) MI6 Headquarters.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

6f8299  No.16696244

File: f470ef1e448180e⋯.png (238.28 KB, 462x342, 77:57, ClipboardImage.png)

File: befa2ad81bfa1e2⋯.png (1.19 MB, 1360x768, 85:48, ClipboardImage.png)

Park Plaza Riverbank Hotel

18 Albert Embankment,

London SE1 7TJ, United Kingdom

See reverse view that matches up with Q cam position/s on bridge.

https://www.parkplazariverbank.com/

Marked up cap from 2012 vid that shows relative location of the hotel vis-a-vis Millibank, Big Ben, The Eye, and Lambeth/Westminster bridges.

The Reverse view very nearly seals the match, I think. But perhaps other candidates will have a much better way to confirm via reverse view.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

6f8299  No.16696248

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

>>16696244

1-AUG-2012-P vid of the two bridgtes over Thames, camera vantage The Eye. Triangulate with Q camera position. Matches-up with the reverse view from hotel room facing toward Westminster Palace and Hungerford Bridge.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hrFKmrkOSc4

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

6f8299  No.16696255

Bakes please correct for next bread.

>>16669791 (You), >>16669800 (You), >>16669827 (You), >>16669858 (You) View of 18 Albert Embankment, River Park Hotel (background) and Crowne Plaza Hotel (foreground)

These SV images show the two hotels in the context of changes made 2012-2014, including the removal of large buildings nearby. These images can be compared with the 22-DEC-2013-P photo of the view from Hungerford Bridge as per last bread.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

6f8299  No.16696262

>>16696255

Unfortunately, last bread was hampered with the attacks. The images posted were self-explanatory but prolly needed discussion to clarify significance.

18 Albert Embankment is prime candidate and very nearly confirmed as the Purple or Pink building captured in Q pics. There may be other candidates so discussion will ensue.

The approximate location of the target building is southbank, i.e. Albert Embankment, across from Millibank Tower - or in that area of River Thames.

Is it between Westminster and Lambeth bridgtes or beyond Lambeth bridge?

Can it be cleanly triangulated with known landmarks and co-ordinates?

Example, 18 Albert Embankment. See previous bread which includes views from roads, the river, and google earth aerial view. In this bread see the reverse view from hotel room facing toward the Q camera position/s. Also see previous bread for caps from vid showing the brightly lit facade of the hotel which roughly follows the purple/pink shades in various open sauce pics. The vid shows blue/purple from distance and from very close-up.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

6f8299  No.16696278

File: 8626dd6dc91a0a5⋯.png (90.79 KB, 130x472, 65:236, ClipboardImage.png)

File: e34ecc978a72d18⋯.png (1.79 MB, 1152x769, 1152:769, ClipboardImage.png)

>>16695851

Interdasting candidate.

Could you attempt a markup to show the edges viewable in the Q pics, such as ROT 1?

Here's a rough illustration. Not to be taken as well-considered, just to illustrate.

In one of the pics you posted, the pink building at 18 Albert Embankment was captured. Bend in shoreline places that location about centre in ROT 1, I think, as per the GE aerial view in last bread and reverse view in tihis bread.

Would be interdasting to do similar views and analysis. The comparisons might be made.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

a104bc  No.16696313

>>16689860

192 subnet addresses are internal, you also screenshot your own ip!

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

6f8299  No.16696348

File: d88213b5962b130⋯.png (648.38 KB, 1589x1059, 1589:1059, ClipboardImage.png)

File: d70bcbfd2b32c78⋯.png (1.28 MB, 1352x768, 169:96, ClipboardImage.png)

>>16695651

See >>16669651 PB

For 29 Albert Embankment may eed images that depict 2012-2014 period for comparison, because that address was demolished and then rebuilt.

1. Purple during that period?

2. As viewed from the approximate vantage of Q-cam and/or The Eye.

3. Before demolition started.

4. Good match for the 22-DEC-2013-T pic.

5. Good match for the 24London pic.

6. Good match for ROT 1 and EMB pics.

7. Good match reverse view ca 2012-2014

The promo vid posted earlier is of the modern Dumont building that was built on same site. Good views. Reverse excellent match as per reverse view of Q cam.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

6f8299  No.16696361

File: b5f17fed0c1280f⋯.png (215.3 KB, 680x541, 680:541, ClipboardImage.png)

File: cacbf563bb7a5d7⋯.png (813.68 KB, 1589x1059, 1589:1059, ClipboardImage.png)

>>16696348

The building that would become The Dumont remained standing 2012-2014.

However, does not match the location of the purple/ pink building in photo take 22-DEC-2013-T. And in that photo, at night, the Dumont area was not lit colourfully.

Need moar to establish plausibility of this building as good match for Q pic?

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

6f8299  No.16696364

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

6f8299  No.16696367

File: 96b84beb78dc27a⋯.png (998.98 KB, 1344x768, 7:4, ClipboardImage.png)

>>16696348

Gud reverse view from The Dumont.

Not how very near this angle places the Riverbank Plaza, too. Both buildings appear to provide noice locations re the pink or purple coloured building in Q pics.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

6f8299  No.16696371

File: f048781bd0a13ac⋯.png (1.58 MB, 1360x699, 1360:699, ClipboardImage.png)

File: d1d126d013c38fc⋯.png (708.47 KB, 1360x699, 1360:699, ClipboardImage.png)

File: 6d2a393a5aa0fb6⋯.png (1.71 MB, 1360x699, 1360:699, ClipboardImage.png)

>>16696364

GE earial views of the Albert Embankment in vicinity of the site of The Dumont.

2013-2017

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

6f8299  No.16696377

File: 00b10f5fdbb47a0⋯.png (1.92 MB, 1360x659, 1360:659, ClipboardImage.png)

>>16696371

GE-06-2019

The area of much crane activity seems mostly filled-in by 2019. Compare with 22DEC-2013-T.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

6f8299  No.16696407

File: 6d18b13120003b7⋯.png (1.48 MB, 1322x672, 661:336, ClipboardImage.png)

>>16696278

Ref points.

Note the pink coloured building at 18 Albert Embankment. And the gap between it and the next buildings, 22-29 Albert Embankment. Then identify the other three buildings pointed at in this marked up pic. Compare with 22-DEC-2013-P, for example. Or with the SV views from the river in AUG-2013. GooMAPS has some gud views of this area, too.

This is the area of increased crane activity just around the time of the Q pics in winter of 2013/2014. That activity continued for several years more.

If the 22-29 Albert Embankment area is location of candidate for pink/ purple building, it was due for some cranes to appear in winter of 2013-2014. Lack of them in the 22-DEC-2013-P pic still matches Q in ROT1 for example.

Not sure that farther along toward SIS HQ would have been within frame of Q pics but maybe just barely. However, that would mean not in positoin of the pink/ purple lights?

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

6f8299  No.16696414

File: af5cfcc4cdb4787⋯.png (1.65 MB, 1351x675, 1351:675, ClipboardImage.png)

File: d10b443e7358f3d⋯.png (1.2 MB, 1356x679, 1356:679, ClipboardImage.png)

File: 9f3867e66184b72⋯.png (1.44 MB, 1352x677, 1352:677, ClipboardImage.png)

>>16696407

SV images for 2012, 2013, 2019.

Reference.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

6f8299  No.16696415

File: eebd52d4b03ccef⋯.png (1.08 MB, 1356x668, 339:167, ClipboardImage.png)

SV-AUG-2013 - on Thames toward Albert Embankment

Reference

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

6f8299  No.16696455

File: 535bc374156d446⋯.png (1015.1 KB, 1352x648, 169:81, ClipboardImage.png)

File: fbf95742c94d7f3⋯.png (1.12 MB, 1351x647, 1351:647, ClipboardImage.png)

File: a677c515fd70c48⋯.png (996.04 KB, 1342x642, 671:321, ClipboardImage.png)

File: eefccb96ac84205⋯.png (2.38 MB, 1360x699, 1360:699, ClipboardImage.png)

>>16696407

The cranes in 22-DEC-2013-T are lit up on top. This does not match Q pics, ROT 1, for example. But the crane acitivity was already started and would increase during next few years.

Here's another possible candidate we cold vet. Penninsula Heights (apartment building) at 93 Embankment in vicinity of the crane activity that appeared in 2013-2014 winter.

This building has a tinted glass facade. Haven't seen it lit up but it has a sort of blocked shape that, if lit up, might match up with the pink/ purple building lights in ROT1.

Assuming can find evidence of it being lit up around the target time interval, here is a river view, a street view, and a reverse view. And a GE aerial view from about the angle of the Q camera near the Hungerford Bridge.

Gud location, it would seem. Facade facing the Q cam quite directly. But was this apartment building ever lit up colourfully?

Of course, if it was the pink/ purple lit area in the Q pics, then, THAT would provide pictorial evidence of it having been so lit. However, gonna need moar than that so we have a martch up on that basis.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

6f8299  No.16696461

File: 45b3a871aba8a46⋯.png (1.48 MB, 1322x672, 661:336, ClipboardImage.png)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

6f8299  No.16696483

File: da27d2934bb047c⋯.png (687.74 KB, 591x1280, 591:1280, ClipboardImage.png)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

6f8299  No.16696534

File: 65dd0acfeab8bee⋯.png (Spoiler Image, 1.6 MB, 1360x699, 1360:699, ClipboardImage.png)

File: 513fa3b076ea718⋯.png (Spoiler Image, 1.61 MB, 1360x699, 1360:699, ClipboardImage.png)

File: 34135965c2380df⋯.png (Spoiler Image, 1.64 MB, 1360x699, 1360:699, ClipboardImage.png)

>>16696483

GE-07-2013-T (3D buildings overlayed)

Candidates? for the pink/ purple lit building in Q-pics, such as ROT 1 Q1423.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

6f8299  No.16696573

File: 2caa28e7e383240⋯.png (Spoiler Image, 1.71 MB, 1360x699, 1360:699, ClipboardImage.png)

File: f9fdfa0864c996e⋯.png (Spoiler Image, 1.37 MB, 1360x699, 1360:699, ClipboardImage.png)

>>16696534

Additional candidates for pink/ purple lit building?

Need some evidence of being lit colourfully.

Position?

Reverse view?

Triangulated with landmarks?

Fairly reasonable to include provided have evidence of colours. Position is plausible for each of these additional buildings.

But not gud matches for 22-DEC-2013-T which shows 18 Albert Embankment as the primary suspect. The lack of cranes lit in the Q pic could raise the prospects of one of these two additional buildings, along with 93 Albert Embankment (Penninsula Hieghts, or PH).

What say you, Anons?

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

6f8299  No.16696587

>>16696573

The vid of a timelapse that takes route to 18 Albert Embankment also shows that location lit up colourfully - a few months after the Q pic time interval. But no cranes lit - of course it was recorded on a dashcam so not looking upward much. The caps from that vid were posted in PB.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

6f8299  No.16696609

>>16696587

Should not lose sight of the fact that most of the candidates for the pink/purple coloured building also reinforce the pre-2015-2016 conclusion UK Anons are working with for dating the Q pics.

If it turns out that the target bulding is 18 Albert Embankment, then 22-DEC-2013 remains a stake in the ground right in the middle of Christmas Week of that winter.

I think that address is coloured in 24London, also. So far none of that helps to narrow the Q pic time interval for EMB pics, but if this building's colours varied, then, we might have a means to do that narrowing.

For me the 22-DEC-2013-T is significant because of this marker but also because the same photographer took pics on that same date of other areas coverred in Q's pics, including the CH (captured yellow bike and other markers) and the riverbank wall adboard (only open sauce matching Q on that marker). The set bangs in the stake really well.

But if there are other canddiates that can not be eliminated for this pink/ purple lit building, then, the process might lead to something else that narrows the time interval better for our digz.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

6f8299  No.16696831

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Was thinking about elevated night time views of the Embankments and figured could re-visit the NYE recordings of 31-DEC-2013-T. This recording includes the pre-show.

1. Confirmation of the rain, natch.

Mark 4:42

https://youtu.be/2KCKIPeHK-I?t=282

2. Interesting choice of interviewees in the crowd all improvised, certainly. Kek. Curious.

Mark 5:06

https://youtu.be/2KCKIPeHK-I?t=306

In this U-Toobs the fireworks were simulated. When I watch first time thought, How'd they do that full blackout? Kek.

3. Returned to 'live action'.

Mark 18:12

https://youtu.be/2KCKIPeHK-I?t=1094

So nuthin to add from that recording. But the BBC did the big show and there were a few views that Anons might find interdasting and maybe spot a few things, IDK.

Moar…

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

6f8299  No.16696840

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

>>16696831

NYE 31-DEC-2013-T

https://youtu.be/5Jp9_sgJcN0

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

6f8299  No.16696954

File: dd91cf54dc6b0b0⋯.png (Spoiler Image, 908.66 KB, 1360x768, 85:48, ClipboardImage.png)

File: 6ceea71153fbeae⋯.png (Spoiler Image, 453.42 KB, 1041x459, 347:153, ClipboardImage.png)

File: d1595d49e4b603f⋯.png (Spoiler Image, 781.25 KB, 1360x768, 85:48, ClipboardImage.png)

File: dd1e5a1a3fedf31⋯.png (Spoiler Image, 923.04 KB, 1360x768, 85:48, ClipboardImage.png)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

6f8299  No.16696965

File: 9a35207e9b2d2ab⋯.png (1.01 MB, 1360x768, 85:48, ClipboardImage.png)

>>16696840

View from NZ House balcony, top floor. See Northumberland Ave and Traf Square.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

6f8299  No.16697024

File: b1bb2fb9415ed38⋯.png (Spoiler Image, 529.36 KB, 891x591, 297:197, ClipboardImage.png)

File: 08f1f7ced782ec8⋯.png (Spoiler Image, 650.24 KB, 1140x440, 57:22, ClipboardImage.png)

>>16696840

Stock photos re Pink/ Purpse coloured building.

2010

https://www.alamy.com/stock-photo-london-united-kingdom-view-from-lambeth-bridge-over-the-thames-53462584.html?imageid=5B79D888-0495-4CBF-8DFD-89D48B0F34FA&p=174741&pn=3&searchId=f98a64120ca63d475dda457dc1bfde2c&searchtype=0

2019

https://www.alamy.com/new-office-block-and-apartment-building-skyscrapers-are-lit-up-at-night-among-construction-cranes-on-the-skyline-of-the-vauxhall-and-nine-elms-regener-image333310623.html?imageid=AACDB3F9-08FF-4E0C-93EA-607279E7DF57&p=300765&pn=3&searchId=f98a64120ca63d475dda457dc1bfde2c&searchtype=0

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

6f8299  No.16697063

>>16696840

Stock photos

2018

https://www.alamy.com/london-england-uk-september-10-2018-the-sun-sets-behind-the-river-thames-and-lambeth-bridge-with-the-modern-riverside-skyline-of-office-blocks-image219397198.html?imageid=429BD824-BA53-49C4-902E-719338EFB829&p=300765&pn=1&searchId=d10a1e939770d191962395238d180b7f&searchtype=0

2018 Dusk

https://www.alamy.com/london-england-uk-september-10-2018-the-sun-sets-behind-the-river-thames-and-lambeth-bridge-with-the-modern-riverside-skyline-of-office-blocks-image219397370.html?imageid=614FF8C3-14AB-47B2-805B-844BB55F45F4&p=300765&pn=1&searchId=d10a1e939770d191962395238d180b7f&searchtype=0

2918 sunset

https://www.alamy.com/london-england-uk-september-10-2018-the-sun-sets-behind-the-river-thames-and-lambeth-bridge-with-the-modern-riverside-skyline-of-office-blocks-image219397145.html?imageid=2C030B2B-52CA-4DD4-A203-17DDCCCF6745&p=300765&pn=1&searchId=d10a1e939770d191962395238d180b7f&searchtype=0

Jan 2018 night

https://www.alamy.com/9-albert-embankment-l-tamesis-dock-floating-pub-park-plaza-hotel-c-and-corniche-apartment-block-r-with-river-thames-in-foreground-london-uk-image233186220.html?imageid=9AC818EC-31B8-4380-87F7-65A6EE7C16F6&p=577708&pn=2&searchId=912ef35f9394cc0cd5d83e4182f8e728&searchtype=0

2019 night

https://www.alamy.com/9-albert-embankment-l-tamesis-dock-floating-pub-park-plaza-hotel-c-and-corniche-apartment-block-r-with-river-thames-in-foreground-london-uk-image233186220.html?imageid=9AC818EC-31B8-4380-87F7-65A6EE7C16F6&p=577708&pn=2&searchId=912ef35f9394cc0cd5d83e4182f8e728&searchtype=0

2015 cranes

https://www.alamy.com/stock-photo-river-thames-at-westminster-bridge-millbank-tower-st-george-towers-78974110.html?imageid=EAFFD37E-C7AB-4AA7-B6DC-B3988EF1D551&p=213191&pn=1&searchId=d10a1e939770d191962395238d180b7f&searchtype=0

REFERENCE Pics

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

6f8299  No.16697224

File: 6b0482c6f0f92a0⋯.png (986.64 KB, 1360x768, 85:48, ClipboardImage.png)

File: a95f7fff345e032⋯.png (999.1 KB, 1360x768, 85:48, ClipboardImage.png)

>>16697063 .

Blue on building beyond Penn Heights so prolly not in best position. But blue flood lights and almost right shape. Would need to be higher up building to more closely match Q pics. But more evidence of coloured lighting there.

https://www.flickr.com/photos/ledgr/8490789154/

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

6f8299  No.16697268

File: 8a686978c7b2090⋯.png (1.33 MB, 1334x652, 667:326, ClipboardImage.png)

>>16697224

https://www.flickr.com/photos/ledgr/8490789154/

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

3da09c  No.16698877

>>16696573

I think that building between Peninsular Heights apartments and MI headquarters is the one. As best I can find the place is called Camelford House. Between it and Peninsular Heights apartments is Tintagel House, formerly Met Police HQ

In >>1669581 the first pic shows the purple lighting The second one by Jason Hawkes shows purple again but the Dumont and Corniche buildings are not there. The third pic from CanStock is what bugs me. Enlarged the left side of Peninsular Heights has coloured lights on at least seven of the floors

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

3da09c  No.16699112

File: ed48e24360a5b7c⋯.jpg (1.91 MB, 1963x1309, 1963:1309, Camelford_House_NSP9263.jpg)

>>16698877 (me)

Camelford House. It get address of 87-90 and then simply 89 Albert Embankment. Like the first two pics in >>16695851 lower floors are floodlit purple

Here is daytime view looking up the Thames towards our camera location at Hungerford Bridge from the roof, buildings own website gallery

https://camelfordhouse.com/gallery/

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

9c34b5  No.16700399

File: da26fbc83b1d080⋯.jpeg (251.45 KB, 992x1399, 992:1399, 353DC21F_87A2_4936_B79A_B….jpeg)

File: e98baee074f2ee0⋯.jpeg (216.02 KB, 935x1319, 935:1319, E78EF1CE_6AB1_4E28_9A19_9….jpeg)

File: 3b2092bd2ea2a81⋯.jpeg (225.53 KB, 935x1319, 935:1319, DDDF44A7_CA0C_430F_BDD6_9….jpeg)

File: 6b285b975d53c64⋯.jpeg (247.25 KB, 935x1319, 935:1319, 6864020B_5A15_4523_9693_5….jpeg)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

9c34b5  No.16700404

File: 6d4fa63a2b861a3⋯.jpeg (245.58 KB, 935x1319, 935:1319, 0DF1F78D_BE20_4D5B_BF41_A….jpeg)

File: 350922b3c9eefc3⋯.jpeg (240.4 KB, 935x1319, 935:1319, 3D90D393_AAE5_4D40_824F_7….jpeg)

File: 89bd9dc0dba2558⋯.jpeg (215.17 KB, 935x1319, 935:1319, 32834AE3_2EB9_4026_8635_2….jpeg)

File: 205a524e104f0e2⋯.jpeg (160.88 KB, 736x1038, 368:519, 543F98BD_95B9_439E_A139_2….jpeg)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

9c34b5  No.16700407

File: 595ef99b2e6f100⋯.jpeg (147.35 KB, 736x1038, 368:519, 1A3BFF5E_4C25_493D_A14B_E….jpeg)

File: 52ea58338c3fbcd⋯.jpeg (196.83 KB, 935x1319, 935:1319, F32CC545_74B3_40DD_8AC1_F….jpeg)

File: e23ab3462218275⋯.jpeg (167.12 KB, 935x1319, 935:1319, 21684EFF_1777_4A0E_8DFF_F….jpeg)

File: 2cad57503b0dc39⋯.jpeg (235.25 KB, 935x1319, 935:1319, 4D436C88_EE58_4CA2_9C39_7….jpeg)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

a5774f  No.16702050

>>16696348

I think this post’s comparison is the most illustrative. The 22DEC2013 pic is the stake in the ground most contemporaneous with the EMB pics, and having the pink/perple phenomonon it convinces me we are looking at the same phenomenon. Nao, looking at the 2012 and 2014 SV images, it looks like the 22DEC pic is much more foreshortened but can still be used with that in mind to place the building not far beyond Lambeth Bridge. I think you have found it.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

a5774f  No.16702166

File: 86e7f22b9db733b⋯.jpeg (139.16 KB, 639x1020, 213:340, 377245C8_1B3C_48EA_BA60_0….jpeg)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

a5774f  No.16702317

File: ef53d704aa85679⋯.jpeg (412.91 KB, 625x962, 625:962, AC586158_F553_4324_8D34_6….jpeg)

>>16702166

To be more precise, I made a red arrow to point to the building I think is our perple bldg. based on Anon’s very gud comparison with SV images.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

a5774f  No.16702568

File: f1593764e074a7e⋯.jpeg (577.27 KB, 640x925, 128:185, 0868DE98_5E0E_48E7_A3C6_B….jpeg)

>>16702317

On reconsideration of a square opening feature on a building, it may be partially iluminated in its upper left by internal lighting. See pic. This would change my nomination for best perple building match to the building to which a perple arrow is pointed.

Nao, which one is that?

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

3da09c  No.16702773

>>16697268

That is just plain weird. I see St George Tower and that certainly looks like the almost turrets of the MI6 HQ building. Since Camelford house we have pics of, but can only prove the purple floodlights on the South-facing side is this the purple floods of Camelford House being reflected by that green glass weirdness of MI6?

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

3da09c  No.16703015

Before I start trying to dig up tourist videos:

How many cranes are we trying to place?

I'm fine with the construction on the Corniche and the Dumont not going on in Winter 2013/2014 when we think the Q Embankment pics and the Lisa MI6 video is taken…I think. Are there more cranes showing in the LISA MI6? Not just Albert Embankment, but anything at or near the Millbank or Westminster Palace? UK #46 there's >>16668639, >>16670385 St Thomas' Hospital East Wing project, London and we may have a crane at St. George tower during that time. Now the part that bugs me: In the US cranes that tall must be lighted at night, FAA Regulations and such. The last pic via CanStock in >>16695851 at first appears to be an unlighted crane next to the St. George. When I enlarged it, the crane appears to be turned just enough to obscure a white light at the "knuckle" where the topmost boom connects

The good part about knowing the names of these buildings is it should be easier to look for announcements of construction starting or ending.

Did the Crowne Plaza Hotel have those pink lights in Winter 2013/2014?

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

a5774f  No.16703360

>>16703015

>Did the Crowne Plaza Hotel have those pink lights in Winter 2013/2014?

Seems a toss up between CROWN PLAZA and PARK PLAZA to me.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

6f8299  No.16703972

>>16699112

>daytime view looking up the Thames towards our camera location at Hungerford

Very noice.

Each candidate's reverse view seems gud match. Gonna need moar, as always.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

6f8299  No.16704118

File: 457d8291d4ce1e8⋯.png (1.05 MB, 1349x679, 1349:679, ClipboardImage.png)

File: 4316f21b8494bab⋯.png (1.73 MB, 1359x677, 1359:677, ClipboardImage.png)

File: 3d5f65076ea8b8f⋯.png (1.26 MB, 1353x677, 1353:677, ClipboardImage.png)

>>16702568

>square opening feature

That might be the front or short side of the 3-sided facade of 18 Albert Embankment. The shae of the building next door plus the treecover street level look like a match in these SV close-ups.

Whatdoyathink?

>16703360

>CROWN PLAZA and PARK PLAZA

Based on 22-DEC-2013-T, yes. And that open sauce matches up well with 24London.

The pink v purple does complicate things somewhate, based on evidence gathered so far.

Crowne Plaza has a pink motif - then and today. But not much in the way of obvious lighting to project that colour so brightly. but they could have used floodlights at times.

Maybe Anons could scour the ground level for possible floodies? Got no night shots with Crowne illuminated in this way.

Riverbank Plaza (which is the building that Anon might have meant re Park Plaza) at 18 Albert has been pohographed as blue and as pink. So that akes purple a sort of in-between hue that might have been captured depending on conditions and camera settings.

Both buildings had very reflective facades. Gonna say, for now, that Riverbank is the most plusible. But in the end, not sure it matters. Both buildings underwent significatn changes after the winter of 2013/2014 such that this pink/ purple lighting in the Q pics provides a reinforcement of the NOT AFTER bookend.

OK. Through this we have a location. Now for the cranes.

>How many cranes are we trying to place?

Scrutinizing the Q pic is one thing. That must be done. Doing the same with 22-DEC-2013-T must also be done.

That said,, we have signs of cranes in open sauces in places that would have been within the camera frames of each of the EMB pics. In that series of Q pics we could produce both a count and map of locations/positons.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

6f8299  No.16704257

File: ed845791c386948⋯.png (318.52 KB, 500x752, 125:188, ClipboardImage.png)

>>16704118

Pink in 2009.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

6f8299  No.16704262

File: 206c3dba55644cb⋯.png (359.18 KB, 632x352, 79:44, ClipboardImage.png)

>>16704257

2011, Crowne and Riverbank hotels.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

6f8299  No.16704289

File: 5cce5ef1410bc92⋯.png (632.82 KB, 1016x759, 1016:759, ClipboardImage.png)

File: 8f0a5e7fcc1674f⋯.png (762.72 KB, 1244x418, 622:209, ClipboardImage.png)

>>16704118

>>16704257

>That said,, we have signs of cranes in open sauces in places that would have been within the camera frames of each of the EMB pics. In that series of Q pics we could produce both a count and map of locations/positons.

www.lonelyreload.com

2013_09_01_archive.html - First found on Dec 1, 2013http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-TNR1coa-rJI/UkrThrrAaRI/AAAAAAAARrc/aSggOszbHc4/s1600/31%2BLondon%2BMadame%2BTussauds%2C%2BLondon%2BMetropolitan%2BUniversity%2C%2BPizza%2BPeeno%2C%2BEDF%2BEnergy%2BLondon%2BEye%2BExperiences%2BSheffield%2BHallam%2BUniversity%2Bstudent%2Btarc%2Bcollege%2Bfeelings.JPG

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

6f8299  No.16704302

>>16704289

The cranes were unlit during the NYE fireworks. The brightly lit buildings, including the pink/ purple one, were subdued or partially lit and dimly at that, during that 31-DEC-2013 event.

Need night views of the same River scene during DEC 2013, but could also use earlier/later sauces of night time views of these cranes.

IF these were generally unlit at night, then, that would reconcile with the Q pics. On the other hand, if the Q pics captured cranes, lite dimly or not at all, then, that would do the trick, also.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

6f8299  No.16704327

File: 87f8de4261c78b2⋯.png (238.01 KB, 633x236, 633:236, ClipboardImage.png)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

6f8299  No.16704415

File: 1698dc9bcda24be⋯.png (506.94 KB, 640x430, 64:43, ClipboardImage.png)

File: 3de4e1306de778a⋯.png (452.69 KB, 640x430, 64:43, ClipboardImage.png)

>>16704327

22-DEC-2013-T

https://www.geograph.org.uk/photo/3816142

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

6f8299  No.16704460

File: b347416d0e8da13⋯.png (503.63 KB, 640x430, 64:43, ClipboardImage.png)

File: 1ba257469d4d99a⋯.png (138.92 KB, 1308x554, 654:277, ClipboardImage.png)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

6f8299  No.16704568

File: dbe1e3e603fcd0e⋯.png (490.96 KB, 430x640, 43:64, ClipboardImage.png)

File: d497a5ded2801ee⋯.png (537.47 KB, 893x715, 893:715, ClipboardImage.png)

Happenstance as searching for moar cranes, came across this image with two details that distinguish the scene from the Q-pics re CH.

1. Folded bollard on island.

2. Orange traffic cone at kerb front of CH.

3. Yellow bike in place is in all 4 Q pics of CH..

ROT 3, CH 1, CH 2 appear to show the yellow bike in SAME orientation and position. Not so sure about CH 3 (but significantly diff camera vantge).

Compare with 22-DEC-2013-T: very nearly identical.

Now, are these actually identical, IDK, but from what is visible can not discern difference. Perhaps other Anons have better eye?

The date, 22-DEC-2013, being a Sunday, may carry significance. Weather? Tidal? Lunar?

Sorry if this distracts from dig on cranes. Serendipity.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

6f8299  No.16704672

File: 3572c583e157eec⋯.png (530.82 KB, 640x426, 320:213, ClipboardImage.png)

File: 4f7627a5189ca7d⋯.png (4.45 MB, 2652x1356, 221:113, ClipboardImage.png)

08-DEC-2012-T

https://www.geograph.org.uk/photo/3377862

CH captured in 2012 (note the bike hire stall along the kerb) during the winter prior to the Q pics. Camera vantage approsimated that of CH 1.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

6f8299  No.16704822

File: c3b7b6728170cf3⋯.png (69.18 KB, 999x433, 999:433, ClipboardImage.png)

File: e83d1e903183f14⋯.png (212.08 KB, 1015x416, 1015:416, ClipboardImage.png)

File: f6d58d506c01631⋯.png (2.2 MB, 1300x954, 650:477, ClipboardImage.png)

File: c4b99282d5ff7f2⋯.png (43.51 KB, 257x101, 257:101, ClipboardImage.png)

>>16704568

>>16704672

Is the following observs caused by Magic Eye, frens?

There are two [2] pics of the Yellow bike taken by same photographer on 22-DEC-2013. Both show one wheel IN FRONT of a post. That is to say, the bike's wheel leans on the camera side of the post.

But the Q pics show the wheel BEHIND that same post. - with the exception of CH 3.

Here are close-ups of the two pics of 22-DEC-2013-T.

And close-ups of CH 2 and CH 3 for comparison.

All of the CH pics provide a view of both the Yellow Bike and the pedestrian island on which there might have been a collapsed or folded bollard. Take a closer look on that island. Compare with the stock photo of 2-MAR-2014-T in which the island surface looks a lot 'cleaner' than in the Q pics.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

6f8299  No.16704844

File: 8fe0d851cb24a18⋯.png (60.79 KB, 982x406, 491:203, ClipboardImage.png)

File: 733552b7ba26f18⋯.png (53.28 KB, 241x114, 241:114, ClipboardImage.png)

File: 64ba48d8606e7b8⋯.png (20.22 KB, 158x62, 79:31, ClipboardImage.png)

File: c19dd108deb7f9c⋯.png (13.78 KB, 133x56, 19:8, ClipboardImage.png)

File: 5a54a87166005c0⋯.png (18.52 KB, 143x57, 143:57, ClipboardImage.png)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

6f8299  No.16704865

>>16704822

Do Anons see the diff between the Yellow Bike's position against that post? Does this distinguish CH 3 from the other Q pics?

AND do Anons see a folded or collapsed bollard, or similar object, laying on the pedestrian island in those Q pics?

Compare with the 22-DEC-2013-T pics, please. Compare with the stock photo of 02-MAR-2014.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

6f8299  No.16704936

File: 5c22829bf5cc2b9⋯.png (1.44 MB, 1357x680, 1357:680, ClipboardImage.png)

>>16704568

Leaving this image from SV-May-2012 showing the pedestrian island.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

6f8299  No.16705019

File: 1ec0313d3b16163⋯.png (390.77 KB, 640x430, 64:43, ClipboardImage.png)

>>16704460

>>16704327

At least three [3] cranes lit in night pic of 28-SEP-2013-T.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

6f8299  No.16705021

>>16705019

Sauce for night pic 28-SEP-2013-T

https://www.geograph.org.uk/photo/3781544

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

6f8299  No.16705073

File: d082c6b7735f61d⋯.png (1001.35 KB, 1338x625, 1338:625, ClipboardImage.png)

>>16704844

>>16704822

Yeh, that Yellow Bike has been captured in SV images parked with one wheel in front of the post. See pic SV-MAY-2014-P.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

a5774f  No.16705204

>>16704822

Sorry my eyes unable to make out CH3. Can you show us by outlining or something? Is this possibly another feature that confirms the wheelie bins being different? That was also CH3 right? So another evening perhaps? You know, the bin thing I could attrib to just later in the evening. The bike wheel thing though… I don’t see this night worker going out in the wee hours for a lunch break. Makes me lean towards him leaving his bike alone for his entire shift, which makes me think diff evening. If of course the CH3 pic is different.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

8fc6d9  No.16707748

>>16558058

3, 2, 1…

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

e2ef5f  No.16708365

YOU WILL EAT ZE FUCKING BUGS!!!

(Repost from late in the bread)

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/london/worlds-largest-cricket-processing-plant-coming-to-london-1.5655813

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

3da09c  No.16716355

File: 849d898ef6fe008⋯.png (2.31 MB, 1920x968, 240:121, 849d898ef6fe00898c2f4c81fb….png)

File: 638418aeb90c006⋯.png (105 KB, 1000x667, 1000:667, vauxhall_london_at_night_1….png)

SMK 732F 1967 AEC Routemaster, body Park Royal H40/32R

London Transort RML2732

Acquired Nov 2013 Ex Dreadnought Coaches, Alnwick

Current Owner: Ensign Bus Company, Purfleet (in 2014)

Summary of Preserved Buses, formerly operated in, or now located in the North East Traffic Area

List updated 27th February 2014

www.nebpt.co.uk/vehicles/pg6.html

SMK 732F is on page 12

As for purple buildings and cranes in Vauxhall, is that something would be i the local paper? Something like a traffic notice to say keep clear of a certain street or intersection because a crane is going up/being taken down?

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

3da09c  No.16718804

File: 17b71875624dbf3⋯.png (350.03 KB, 620x372, 5:3, StGeorgeVauxhall_Tower.png)

Maybe this tower needs some further scrutiny. "Students" in their 20s in multi-million pound apartments?

'Tower for the toffs': UK's tallest skyscraper and playground of the rich

Robert Booth 24 May 2016

The Tower at St George Wharf has 214 flats on 50 floors, costing up to £51m. With no affordable homes, it feels more like a hotel than a home

Since it opened in October 2013, apartments have sold at prices ranging from £580,000 to £51m. The Tower includes no “affordable” housing and flats go on sale for as much as £2,100 per sq ft – almost three times the UK average for apartments.

The controversial decision by the former Labour deputy prime minister John Prescott to grant the Tower planning consent set a precedent for a dozen similar apartment towers now emerging in a mini-Manhattan at Nine Elms, a former industrial area soon to be home to the new US embassy and quickly transforming into London’s latest millionaires’ playground.

Residents can only access their own floors using a special key fob; a £15m apartment occupying the whole 45th floor has fingerprint recognition locks.

Some Tower residents are here all the time. Many are said to be students at London universities, there is a dentist and a doctor as well. But one peculiarity about life in the Tower is the lack of children.

“There are not many families here,” the employee said. “You won’t find many children between the ages of five and 20. There are students in their 20s, many from Asia.”

The Tower very nearly remained on the architects’ drawing board. In 2005, the London borough of Lambeth said the architecture was not good enough, it was too tall, and the overall St George Wharf complex of which it was part had insufficient affordable housing. The planning inspector agreed that was it too high and harmful to views of the Palace of Westminster and agreed it should not be built. It was left to Prescott to decide. As he deliberated, the former Conservative education secretary Kenneth Baker warned parliament the plans echoed Aldous Huxley’s classic dystopian novel Brave New World.

“Your lordships will remember that in the Brave New World the rich and the toffs were called alphas, and they were at the top,” he told the House of Lords. “The gammas, the deltas and the epsilons – the proles – were down at the bottom. That is how the development is to be done. In that great tower there will be no social affordable housing. It is all for the alphas. It is all for the toffs.”

He continued: “So we have a Labour deputy prime minister, a man who I think would describe himself as a good old-fashioned socialist, giving approval for a tower for the toffs. The other irony is that half of those flats, which will sell for upwards of £1m – probably, the higher one goes, more than £5m – will be bought by foreigners.”

Full Article:

https://www.theguardian.com/society/2016/may/24/st-george-wharf-tower-london-luxury-pads-emblematic-housing-crisis

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

3da09c  No.16719993

File: 02007e6624ead84⋯.jpg (193.23 KB, 1300x956, 325:239, london_england_uk_10th_aug….jpg)

>>16705019

Four on 10-AUG-2013-T

The one to the left of the Crowne Plaza is there, but lights not visible, I had to enlarge the image to see it standing there

https://www.alamy.com/stock-photo-london-england-uk-10th-august-2013-view-from-the-golden-jubilee-bridge-59174399.html?

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

3da09c  No.16720242

File: d9c6ffb5b350bb0⋯.jpg (126.33 KB, 1300x814, 650:407, mi6_building_st_george_wha….jpg)

Camelford House again with the purple floodlighting on the South facing side of the building

Alamy Stock 28-May-2013-T

https://www.alamy.com/mi6-building-st-george-wharf-the-tower-and-vauxhall-bridge-on-the-thames-at-night-london-uk-image448812815.html?

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

3da09c  No.16720353

File: 1a20d29a5b395e5⋯.jpg (111.95 KB, 1300x955, 260:191, colourful_night_view_of_va….jpg)

19-JAN-2018

There's some blue

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

6f8299  No.16720729

>>16705204

>>16704865

Gonna try to tag prev posts in a bread to make it easier to keep track of posts related to London Pics during discussions now and future future archive/ search purposes.

>>16716355

>Something like a traffic notice to say keep clear of a certain street or intersection because a crane is going up/being taken down?

Good thot. The city might have some permit approvals too for moving equipment and even for operating hours for that equipment. Might indicate a more narrowed interval for first appearance and such. Might mean going into deeper onsite research or even writing or calling queries. Not all is on the interwebs.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

6f8299  No.16720752

>>16702568 >>16719993 >>16720242

>>16720729 >>16705019 >>16704327

>>16702568

>>16720353

>There's some blue

Yup, that's the same building at 18 Albert Embankment but after the additional floors were constructed. Interdasting that the short side of the three-side river view of that hotel could also be lit up like that. If it could be done prior to the addition of the upper floors, then, it might even provide a BETTER match with the Q pics than the northside view would have.

Like this pic from 2009

>>16704257

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

6f8299  No.16720788

File: 6bfaf40b7777c68⋯.png (669.65 KB, 1792x624, 112:39, ClipboardImage.png)

File: 0366d87c9b879e7⋯.png (744.44 KB, 1764x600, 147:50, ClipboardImage.png)

>>16704568 >>16705073 >>16704844

Compare with

>>16705073

In these views of the Yellow Bike, it looks to me like the front wheel was at times turned away from the kerb and the handle bars were rested against the post.

Not the same as other pics in which, to my eye, the bike was 'threaded' between the posts so that the rear wheel was chained to the left post and the front wheel, bolted, was rested on the kerbside of the second post, handle bars resting just so to keep the front and rear wheels lined-up together between the posts.

In all of these images shown so far, the bike's was oriented toward the Northumberland with the rearwheel pointing toward White Hall, or in the general direction of the park.

Depending on how the Q pics are viewed, with more or less zooming in, the bike seems to lean outward, toward the kerb, rather than inward, toward the hotel.

Anyway, as Anon has noted, if there are differences discerned between Ch3 and the other Q pics, and the bike might have been moved, and returned, then we have a distinct point within the time interval of the CH pics. Quite useful, that would be.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

6f8299  No.16720801

>>16704460

That pic of the TATT in the foreground, taken on 22-DEC-2013, shows the scene in daylight. Wonder if it contains hints of time of day; and if the tidal depiction could thus provide a sort of reference point to situate the Q pics - ROT 1 AND LisaMI6 come to mind.

If that was so, then, it might help re the appearance of cranes in the background. Just looking here to find more pieces to put on the table for this jigsaw. Trying to scrounge up more from the pictorial contents we've gathered.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

6f8299  No.16720863

File: c725ad3056bfa16⋯.png (1.3 MB, 1352x664, 169:83, ClipboardImage.png)

File: 98e83d10b5a4a17⋯.png (1.15 MB, 1360x670, 136:67, ClipboardImage.png)

>>16720788 >>16720801

By SV-JUL-2014 the yellow bike was replaced with a red bike, apparently.

Note how in these images the rear was pointed toward Northumberland and the front was pointed toward White Hall, or the park.

Reference.

https://www.google.com/maps/@51.5066183,-0.1234377,3a,75y,289.25h,93.2t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1sAludm0l0XVbgql6YZQ3rWw!2e0!5s20140701T000000!7i13312!8i6656

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

6f8299  No.16720872

>>16720863

Sorry, only one of those SV images from JUL-2014 showed the red bike pointed toward White Hall. Interdasting. This series of SV images from the same month showed the bike had been moved and returned.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

6f8299  No.16720902

>>16720872

SV-JUL-2014 VIEW

https://www.google.com/maps/@51.5066183,-0.1234377,3a,62.6y,286.08h,85.63t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1sAludm0l0XVbgql6YZQ3rWw!2e0!5s20140701T000000!7i13312!8i6656

May 2015 view

https://www.google.com/maps/@51.5065318,-0.123457,3a,34.2y,333.02h,85.49t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1s_FMfP1h9XoALRJzt6VMCwg!2e0!5s20140701T000000!7i13312!8i6656

An yet another with no bike parked.

https://www.google.com/maps/@51.5065318,-0.123457,3a,34.2y,333.02h,85.49t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1s_FMfP1h9XoALRJzt6VMCwg!2e0!5s20140701T000000!7i13312!8i6656

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

6f8299  No.16720923

File: 473f4c6bb6cf16a⋯.png (1.64 MB, 1353x678, 451:226, ClipboardImage.png)

>>16720902

Yellow bike on 2022, front wheel pointed toward White Hall, park. In this image the front wheel is chained to post and the rear is bolted.

SV-JUL-2022

https://www.google.com/maps/@51.5066632,-0.1233641,3a,15y,249.8h,80.55t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1s47_XkKn0PAPlPYjhPIr9JQ!2e0!5s20220601T000000!7i16384!8i8192

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

e87456  No.16720935

File: 403df554e6b2ff3⋯.jpeg (122.08 KB, 1300x955, 260:191, 3150CF66_E78C_4B7A_A9DC_9….jpeg)

File: c734a18d2cf8bdc⋯.jpeg (112.64 KB, 640x1136, 40:71, 2924EDBF_B74D_491C_9FF8_B….jpeg)

File: 672484dccb764a3⋯.png (94.32 KB, 1136x640, 71:40, B700D7FC_C010_4006_9343_6D….png)

>>16720353

Hope anons won’t mind my parallel digging but we all have our interests.

I noticed in anon’s posted pic that recognizable constellations were still capable of overcoming the London city lights so that even their full constellations were visible even near the horizon where the halo of the atmosphere and city lights is brightest and most difficult to observe celestial objects.

Why do I being this up? Well, in LONDON 2847 we have some feint lights which could be stars but which some thought might be just planes in the direction of Heathrow. (Would be quite a dogfight over Hearhrow though, in my humble opinion, if they are just plane lights.) Nevertheless, this pic provided by anon gives this anon an excellent idea of just how big the constellation of Orion appears and how high on the horizon. A great resource pic of stars seen even with feint clouds visible.

The direction is generally South but I can’t get an exact direction to give a time for the open source pic. But the scalar reference is excellent to visualize the size of constellations in the London sky.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

6f8299  No.16720953

>>16720788

With the englargments of close-ups of the yellow bike in the CH pics, can Anons see difference/s?

ROT 3, CH 1, CH 2 seem to show the yellow bike has one wheel behind the Do Not Enter signpost; and the other wheel behind the other post; note that this second post stands in front of a shorter post a bollard perhaps and it is NOT a lampost but looks like another sign post but without an actual sign on it.

CH3 seems to depict one of the bike wheels behind the Do Not Enter post but the other wheel in front of the second post.

AND, if I am not mistaken, CH3 shows the bike pointed in opposite direction of the other 3 Q pics. Scrutinize the cross bar of the frame. Look for the seat v the handle bars. Maybe I am seeing things, IDK.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

6f8299  No.16720965

>>16720935

That's a brilliant observ, fren.

The alamy stock photo is dated, winter of 2018, few years AFTER winter of 2013/2014.

Noice that this confirms detection of the constellation in London pic. Very kewel.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

e87456  No.16721106

>>16720935

Sorry, forgot to say I highlighted the stars (blue) in the original open sauce from Alamy. >>16720353

>>16720965

Yes, a reference pic proving constellations can be photographed even above the bright lit night sky above high rise buildings.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

e87456  No.16721135

>>16721106

Sorry, did not mean Yes >brilliant<

but, Yes, >stock photo from 2018< can be used as a reference.

Carry on.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

e87456  No.16721233

>>16720953

>AND, if I am not mistaken, CH3 shows the bike pointed in opposite direction of the other 3 Q pics. Scrutinize the cross bar of the frame. Look for the seat v the handle bars. Maybe I am seeing things, IDK.

My device has not greatest res for chiming in but…

I can say that if CH3 is diff it adds to the bins being different in CH3.

CH3 seems as untethered as CH1 is to the rest of the EMB/CH pics.

The RED jacket fellow at the bike hire may be tentative link betw CH1 and CH3, but if the yellow bike positions in CH1 and CH3 don’t match…At times I think CH1 is a morning shot but sometimes I think it’s taken at sunset because if that tiny bit of pinkish sky seen up Whitehall Place and if it us morning, would they grab the bins so soon? I suppose they could. But would they? Can’t be sure we don’t have diff dates nao. Like LISA.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

3da09c  No.16724486

Building Scrutiny Bun

>>16695651, >>16695655, >>16696348, >>16696361, >>16696367, >>16696371, >>16696377 The DUMONT

>>16695851, >>16696278, >>16696407, >>16720242 Camelford House, 87-90 Albert Embankment

>>16696244, >>16696248 Park Plaza London Riverbank Hotel 18 Albert Embankment, London SE1 7TJ, 1-AUG-2012-P vid of the two bridges over Thames, camera vantage The Eye (video)

>>16696414, >>16696415 Vauxhall SV images for 2012, 2013, 2019. Reference

>>16696455 Peninsula Heights Apartments, 93 Albert Embankment. The cranes in 22-DEC-2013-T are lit up on top

>>16696534 GE-07-2013-T (3D buildings overlayed)

>>16696573 Additional candidates for pink/ purple lit building?

>>16696609 Should not lose sight of the fact that most of the candidates for the pink/purple coloured building also reinforce the pre-2015-2016 conclusion UK Anons are working with for dating the Q pics

>>16696831, >>16696840 New Years Eve 31-DEC-2013-T videos for elevated night time views of the Embankments

>>16696954 NYE 31-DEC-2013-T via BBC One

>>16697024, >>16697063 Stock photos, various years

>>16704118, >>16704257, >>16720353 Crowne Plaza Hotel, 10-11 Albert Embankment London SE1 7SP with obvious pink exterior lighting

>>16704262 2011, Crowne and Riverbank hotels

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

3da09c  No.16724487

Counting Cranes Bun

>>16704118, >>16704289 Signs of cranes in open sauces in places that would have been within the camera frames of each of the EMB pics

>>16704327 At least six cranes around Dec 2013

>>16704415, >>16704460 22-DEC-2013-T Daytime pic over looking TATTERSHALL CASTLE, 4 to 5 cranes visible over Vauxhall

>>16705019, >>16705021 At least three [3] cranes lit in night pic of 28-SEP-2013-T

>>16719993 Four cranes 10-AUG-2013-T The one to the left of the Crowne Plaza is there, but lights not visible, had to enlarge the image to see it

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

3da09c  No.16724490

Corinthia Hotel & Yellow Bike Bun

>>16704568 Image with two details that distinguish the scene from the Q-pics re CH

>>16704672 08-DEC-2012-T Corinthia Hotel and Blue Boris Bikes

>>16704822 Pics of the Yellow bike taken by same photographer on 22-DEC-2013. Both show one wheel IN FRONT of a post, Q pics show the wheel BEHIND that same post - with the exception of CH3

>>16704936 SV-May-2012 showing the pedestrian island

>>16705073, >>16720953 Yellow Bike SV images parked with one wheel in front of the post, SV-MAY-2014-P

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

3da09c  No.16724497

Notables are NOT Endorsements

passing 175

#47

>>16720935, >>16721106 Anons notices the constellations visible despite city lights in 2018 Alamy stock pic

>>16724486 Building Scrutiny Bun

>>16724487 Counting Cranes Bun

>>16724490 Corinthia Hotel & Yellow Bike Bun

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

603135  No.16728506

PM for PM

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

1c5cca  No.16730413

File: a2392aeb320be0d⋯.jpeg (37.71 KB, 474x632, 3:4, E2BB971B_1A63_4E95_81D7_0….jpeg)

>>16728506

Pall Mall old boy? Why yes I think I shall.

Per astera ad Astra.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

1c5cca  No.16730552

>>16720935

>some thought might be just planes in the direction of Heathrow. (Would be quite a dogfight over Hearhrow though, in my humble opinion, if they are just plane lights.)

A CLARIFICATION- the original anon who speculated the stars/lights were plane traffic positioning for landing thought them bound for Heathrow. It should be noted that Heathrow is West of London and Gatwick airport is due South from Westminster. Some of the lights could still be air traffic to and from either airport. However, Gatwick is some 45 kilometers away as the crow flies. If some lights are air traffic, they could still be lining up before making making a turn West toward Heathrow and would be doing so closer to London than those from Gatwick.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

1c5cca  No.16730686

File: 22f2bc76739c6f1⋯.jpeg (491.8 KB, 640x1101, 640:1101, 882A2E99_3633_426A_958E_3….jpeg)

File: 18089616310d0eb⋯.png (371.92 KB, 640x1136, 40:71, 029F68CC_8514_43FB_9FBC_B8….png)

>>16720801

>>16720801

>Wonder if it contains hints of time of day; and if the tidal depiction could thus provide a sort of reference point to situate the Q pics - ROT 1 AND LisaMI6 come to mind.

Sorry, just read anon’s post. Am getting bad for just skimming posts without reading.

Found this for London Bridge 2013. Close enuf.

https://tidesandcurrents.noaa.gov/tidetables/2013/eutt2013book.pdf

See pg. 68

Can discuss time in follow on post.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

1c5cca  No.16730811

File: dcc6f0fd8f111c4⋯.jpeg (109.16 KB, 640x430, 64:43, E2C4D5D3_4177_4099_88E8_5….jpeg)

>>16704460

>>16720801

>>16730686

Okay so looking at pic, it is late afternoon for December because sunset is around 4pm right? Will check. Anyway, to get a Suncalc bearing, is pic from Hungerford?Exactly where will help.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

1c5cca  No.16730914

File: 3a4bf57df7f10e2⋯.jpeg (266.63 KB, 640x1105, 128:221, 8C404657_5B5F_454E_9FC5_5….jpeg)

>>16730686

According to our tide chart, high tide was at 16:39. After sunset which was at 15:54.

So pic is a bit before 15:54 but definitely afternoon. The gangplank to TATTS is kind of lowish. So tide is still coming in.

https://www.timeanddate.com/sun/uk/london?month=12&year=2013

A look at SUNCALC might narrow the exact bearing of the sun by the shadows noted on railing in the 22DEC TATTS pic.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

1c5cca  No.16731159

File: 9e5b01126821c73⋯.jpeg (169.91 KB, 1136x640, 71:40, 9E770D06_9CE7_454C_A961_9….jpeg)

>>16730811

>>16730914

This is one instance when I am happy to have been off in my original time of day/ bearing to sun estimates.

First, it looks like the Sun’s shadow is lined up with that squarish concrete mooring with railings on top that juts out between the HISP and the TATTS.

When you line up the shadows with the Sun using Suncalc I get the time to be about 1:30pm.

Second, that’s a gud thing because of the lowish look of the TATTS gangplank. This means the pic is 3 hours til high tide. Still a lot of water to rise. There is not a lot of rise (in tide) in that last hour. So all gud to have more time until high tide.

https://www.suncalc.org/#/51.5062,-0.1222,19/2013.12.22/13:34/1/1

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

1c5cca  No.16731429

File: 4ba3382dd265da9⋯.jpeg (114.89 KB, 1404x575, 1404:575, 673BA3D3_09EF_4F43_B5CE_8….jpeg)

>>16731159

>There is not a lot of rise (in tide) in that last hour.

What I mean by that statement is explained by the Rule of Twelfths for tides. Only 1/12 of the tide volume occurs in that last or first hour of the tide. See diagram.

Having 3 hours before high tide means HALF of the tide remains to come in.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

3da09c  No.16732209

File: 9238d49b379a6a7⋯.jpg (186.74 KB, 1300x956, 325:239, restaurant_ship_hispaniola….jpg)

File: ac7cf92c9b00d6f⋯.jpg (43.4 KB, 530x355, 106:71, w_122_6.jpg)

First pic for reference to show the distance from Hungerford Bridge to TATTERSHALL CASTLE. TinEye says 22 Aug 2021 but best date I can find is 1 May 2010

Second pic no date available, what caught me attention is the area is bathed in a red floodlighting I've never seen before

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

6f8299  No.16732365

File: a48923d7c5ef497⋯.png (131.75 KB, 465x408, 155:136, ClipboardImage.png)

Man acquitted re Air India bombing has been shot in Canada

https://twitter.com/i/events/1547655686493913091

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

1c5cca  No.16732462

File: ce4f209b5b90a23⋯.jpeg (22.81 KB, 474x315, 158:105, 702E968C_EBFF_4659_9A49_3….jpeg)

>>16732209

>>16732365

Heard u guys are looking for cranes in South London.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

6f8299  No.16732538

>>16732209

Noice.

Both pics show the TATT's funnel as white on top so prior to her move to Hull for the upgrades and change in her colour scheme.

Alamy pic shows no shroud behind Big Ben, no cranes in the skyline of Albert Embankment, not Q-match for the banner signs on the TATT's rails on deck, unlit RAF eagle memorial (or low lit), decent view of the gate at the streetside end of TATT's gangplank, and a great view of the HISP'S ramp and its entrance awning at the sidewalk. No advert boards that I can spot.

So prolly pre 2013/2014. Gud reference for the markers, too.

>best date I can find is 1 May 2010

Sauce, fren?

The camera for the Discoveric pic was located on the ramp on the riverside of the river wall. Just before the gate at the backside of the Bazalgette memorial that is a marker in the EMB pics.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

6f8299  No.16732540

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

6f8299  No.16732556

>>16730686 >>16730811 >>16730914 >>16731159 >>16731429

Well done. Making the most of what we have. Noice observs.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

3da09c  No.16732639

File: 695613e97b4fe86⋯.png (1.09 MB, 1920x947, 1920:947, Screenshot_2022_07_14_at_1….png)

>>16732538

Scratch that first date, date is from a pic where the Eye is pink/purple

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

3da09c  No.16732851

WHO has gone woke

General Research #21105 >>16732450

World Health Organization Officially States That There Are More Than Two Biological Genders

The WHO has announced that it intends to update its “widely-used gender mainstreaming manual.”

The body says of the manual that it is “updating it in light of new scientific evidence and conceptual progress on gender, health and development.”

What exactly that ‘scientific evidence’ is is still a mystery.

The press release from the WHO states that part of its new findings to go into the manual is that “sex is not limited to male or female.”

The WHO states that it is “going beyond binary approaches to gender and health,” in order “[t]o recognize gender and sexual diversity, or the concepts that gender identity exists on a continuum and that sex is not limited to male or female.”

Sauce: New York Post https://twitter.com/nypost/status/1546849565743120385

The globalist body, in partnership with the United Nations University International Institute for Global Health, also intends to introduce “new gender, equity and human rights frameworks and tools to further support capacity building around these concepts and the integration of their approaches.”

Sauce: https://www.zerohedge.com/political/world-health-organisation-gender-not-limited-male-or-female

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

1c5cca  No.16733324

>>16732209

>>16732538

>unlit RAF eagle memorial

Good catch. So the RAF memorial being darkened is not unusual. Do we have an idea what time the new sauce pic was taken?

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

3da09c  No.16734100

File: e14a98aca83bad0⋯.png (1.39 MB, 1920x947, 1920:947, Screenshot_2022_07_14_at_2….png)

>>16732209 (me)

>>16732538

Found it!

First pic taken 25 October 2014

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

3da09c  No.16734442

1 March 2014

Corinthia Hotel, blue Boris Bikes, Spamalot at the Playhouse Theatre, and that little green with white cross First Aid sign or whatever it is on the pole

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

3da09c  No.16734449

File: 8bcb1cb5b7d5a55⋯.png (1.52 MB, 1920x947, 1920:947, Screenshot_2022_07_14_at_2….png)

>>16734442 (me)

Amazing how much better it works to actually post the screencap

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

3da09c  No.16734821

File: 71f895fb5b90345⋯.png (1.43 MB, 1920x947, 1920:947, Screenshot_2022_07_14_at_2….png)

24 October 2015

Post-Refit TATTERSHALL CASTLE

RAF Memorial is dark

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

825409  No.16735369

File: cd649d09d4aea68⋯.jpg (285.96 KB, 564x846, 2:3, Persist.jpg)

>>16689629

Keep trying to connect.

Approx. 19:00 EST, Saturday 23rd July 2022.

May all in danger reach safe harbour.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

6f8299  No.16742328

File: b8333aa9ca63d92⋯.png (390.14 KB, 792x642, 132:107, ClipboardImage.png)

>>16719993

Cap of Alamy stock photo, 10-AUG-2013-T.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

6f8299  No.16742364

File: 23e30ca58ebb57f⋯.png (591.04 KB, 1360x604, 340:151, ClipboardImage.png)

>>16705019

>https://www.geograph.org.uk/photo/3781544

Cap of N. Chadwick pic of Thames skyline, 17-DEC-2013. Night.

No pink/purple lit building, apparently.

Interdasting date.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

6f8299  No.16742373

File: 4b86dc3cf2dd998⋯.png (379.67 KB, 1360x604, 340:151, ClipboardImage.png)

>>16742364

Sorry, DEC was date submitted.

Date Taken = 28-SEP-2013-T.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

fa237c  No.16747168

>>16733324

8-NOV-2016-T.

https://www.bitchute.com/video/NgOsVFAEw9Pd/

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

fa237c  No.16747275

File: 4012e7aea9f81ad⋯.png (559.14 KB, 1045x589, 55:31, ClipboardImage.png)

File: 1ec963a1629362d⋯.png (599.15 KB, 1053x589, 1053:589, ClipboardImage.png)

File: 93752dc64f33789⋯.png (825.91 KB, 1348x581, 1348:581, ClipboardImage.png)

File: abcd82cd9830953⋯.png (826.43 KB, 1348x581, 1348:581, ClipboardImage.png)

OCT-2011, Reference, view from footbridge similair to Q pics, especially LisaMi6.

VID

https://www.bitchute.com/video/mt7jBASQ5LvO/

Caps with highlights of areas of interest.

RAF Memorial.

Bright object in night sky.

Skyline at Albert Embankment

TATT's gangplank gate.

HISP's entrance re individual pedestrian for scale and comparison with LisaMI6.

Also note the aft deck of TATT, tables, seats; note the lack of interior illumination on the bridge dining area. For comparison with LisaMI6.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

fa237c  No.16747303

File: 60ce66c1eb866ec⋯.png (605.27 KB, 1360x768, 85:48, ClipboardImage.png)

>>16747275

Vid, comparison, LisaMI6 with two open sauces.

https://www.bitchute.com/video/bzft57cyoYTI/

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

3da09c  No.16747379

>>16747275

It looks to me like in those pics there is a floodlight on the river side of the RAF Memorial pointed as to illuminate the wings in a kid of backlighting effect. Down at the base, roughly street level

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

fa237c  No.16747440

File: 01a2f9a3fb4f51f⋯.png (685.75 KB, 1360x768, 85:48, ClipboardImage.png)

>>16747303

Purple Sister, vid mark 1 minute

https://youtu.be/eDzV7cMRvHM?t=63

The vid shows pics from a photo competition. Photographers had 24 hours in middlle of July 2014 to tke improvised pics of London. However, the rooftop shrouding over construction work behind Big Ben indicate this particiuar photo was tke in DEC 2013 and not in JUL 2014.

The closeup view of Millibank Tower lights on upper floors suggest a strong match with LisaMI6. >>16747303

There are other open sauces that narrow the time interval to Christmas week and quite possibly even narrower.

Given the 22-DEC-2013 pics of the EMB area taken by N. Chadwick and posted online (see prev UK breads0, perhaps Anons could take a re-look for more pictorial evidence and analysis.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

fa237c  No.16747575

File: 44cc46179da7fb6⋯.png (934.99 KB, 1356x768, 113:64, ClipboardImage.png)

>>16747440

The 24London open sauce photo (nicknamed "Purple Sister" re LisaMI6) has been marked up to point at potential time markers.

In addition to the two red lights on consstruction cranes, can Anons spot other cranes?

An arrow points at a bright white object near a rooftop. Can we rule out the Moon? Might it be another safety light - although it is much brighter and appears larger than other rooftop lights in various sauces and did not apper in Q pics, item A. Perhaps it flashes on and off and just had not been captured randomly.

Item B is pointed at a dim object inthe skyhline that may be another crane in some distance beyond the waterfront buildings. Or on a building and just between intermittent flashes?

Item C points at the 'gap' in the row of waterfront buildings. This may indicate time taken related to demolition schedule? While this area was not well-captured in Q pics, it was in the frame for the 22-DEC-2013-T submission of Chadwick. This has been compared with SV imagery in the previous UK Bread.

Three encircled areas include Millibank Tower, rooftop shroud, and RAF Memorial.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

fa237c  No.16747587

File: 453fac0f3e96f44⋯.png (7.94 MB, 4192x1928, 524:241, ClipboardImage.png)

>>16747575

Moar points of interest in comparison between open sauce pics and LisaMI6. Each of these points have a story of its own so will add text analysis in short while.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

fa237c  No.16747634

File: 22aabfc9fb31c33⋯.png (440.46 KB, 985x508, 985:508, ClipboardImage.png)

>>16747575

>In addition to the two red lights on consstruction cranes, can Anons spot other cranes?

>Item C points at the 'gap' in the row of waterfront buildings.

Look for these points, and others, in closeup of the Albert Embankment as cap;tured by Chadwick 22-DEC-2013.

The 24London pic (Purple Sister) matches up ok with Chadwick's pic re the gap in the waterfront buildings and some, if not all, of the location of the two obvious crane red lights. The daylight pic shows more cranes that, if present, were not lit-up in nightime open sauce pics - and not apparent in Q pics. This comparison does not prove the cranes were present nor that they were not present at time of Q pics. But it remains an open question. Hence the significance of the construction schedule on Albert Embankment. Give the stke in the ground provided by Chadwick, 22-DEC-2013, we can use pics from that same time interval, if possible, to relate back to the Q pics, I think.

Likewise for open sauce images that captured Christmas week lights and markers in the area around the foot of the Eye.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

fa237c  No.16747671

File: b818cd80e8a4d78⋯.png (1012.96 KB, 1024x461, 1024:461, ClipboardImage.png)

This aerial pic was taken from the Millbank Tower. Have misplaced the date taken, however, it it was before the Q time interval by a few years, if I recall correctly.

Note that the gap in the row of waterfront buldings had not yet appeared at the time of this pic. Also the Crowne Plaza had not yet undergone rennovations. And 18 Albert Embankment, the building with the 3-sided waterfront, had not been rennovated; this is the brightly lit purple/ pink building in other pics, including Q pics.

So this predates the time interval of Christmas week 2013. However it is a very good reference for other considerations.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

fa237c  No.16747726

File: 978cf7d8a629a88⋯.png (547.95 KB, 1354x626, 677:313, ClipboardImage.png)

>>16747634 >>16747671 >>16747575

What follows is a series of SV images taken from the street at the foot of Millbank Tower. The various SV images along the Millbank (A3212) provide a view of the other side of the river which is obstructed by treecover. Coincidentally, the best view of the area of interest is from the approxiamte locaton of Millbank both elevated and on the ground level.

Orientate on GooMap - see Millbank Tower across the river from Park Plaza River Bank hotel.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

fa237c  No.16747742

File: c127ba1c8d1e826⋯.png (984.21 KB, 1356x647, 1356:647, ClipboardImage.png)

File: 55cc746779addac⋯.png (951.4 KB, 1354x646, 677:323, ClipboardImage.png)

>>16747726

For the sake of completedness, this series of SV images includes 2012 to 2020 so as to capture the demolition and construction period on this part of Albert Embankment.

SV-SEP-2012

SV-JUN-2014

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

fa237c  No.16747754

File: cf89e2795109e2a⋯.png (1.11 MB, 1356x652, 339:163, ClipboardImage.png)

File: 81996eda5a1c3d8⋯.png (1.14 MB, 1356x640, 339:160, ClipboardImage.png)

>>16747742

SV-MAY-2016

SV-MAR-2017

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

fa237c  No.16747766

File: ffada9ad376d6a4⋯.png (1.32 MB, 1358x638, 679:319, ClipboardImage.png)

File: b476e1cb2715966⋯.png (1.52 MB, 1352x648, 169:81, ClipboardImage.png)

>>16747754

SV-OCT-2018

SV-NOV-2020

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

fa237c  No.16747778

File: 7b1892f5890c018⋯.png (603.63 KB, 835x572, 835:572, ClipboardImage.png)

Here is a good view of the area of interest on Albert embankment. It appears to have been taken from a position over the riverbank wall, likely on the river.

This pic predates the Q time interval as per the prev explanation in >>16747671 .

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

fa237c  No.16747817

File: 63d9b7434d86e68⋯.png (1.04 MB, 1360x678, 680:339, ClipboardImage.png)

>>16747726

The SV images from the roadways once again has a gap for the year 2013. This gap in SV imagery exists on the Victoria Embankment side also. Coincidence, maybe.

Well, GooMaps does show a view of both sides of the river from the deck of a boat on the Thames and this was captured in 2013.

SV-AUG-2013

https://www.google.com/maps/@51.4920119,-0.1241766,3a,89.9y,98.97h,97.75t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1spW-GcO9F-d6kga76LgpxfA!2e0!6shttps:%2F%2Fstreetviewpixels-pa.googleapis.com%2Fv1%2Fthumbnail%3Fpanoid%3DpW-GcO9F-d6kga76LgpxfA%26cb_client%3Dmaps_sv.tactile.gps%26w%3D203%26h%3D100%26yaw%3D113.33927%26pitch%3D0%26thumbfov%3D100!7i13312!8i6656

Preprations for demolition are evident at the area that would become a gap in the row of buildings along Albert Embankment.

The vantage for this view is prolly pretty close to the position on the river of the boat seen in the last pic - >>16747778

So from this series of SV images we can confirm that 22-DEC-2013-T which shows the gap must have been taken after SV-AUG-2013. This just helps reinforce the winter 2013/2014 time interval for the Q pics.

Add sries of Chadwick pics from 22-DEC-2013 and we can connect the appearance of the gap in the row of buldings with the Q pics and Christmas week.

Nothing spectacular but this is the foundation for the re-look that I invite Anons to undertake.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

fa237c  No.16747901

>>16747778

>It appears to have been taken from a position over the riverbank wall, likely on the river.

Correction. That observ is out of date. From notes on a different pics which was undated. Apologies

That pic which pre-dates Q pics, was prolly taken close to the following lcoation.

https://www.google.com/maps/@51.4909422,-0.1260912,3a,89y,94.54h,98.76t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1snfYKR8lBa4uME-pQ-HYZxQ!2e0!5s20080901T000000!7i13312!8i6656

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

fa237c  No.16748013

File: 56ad217b16818d3⋯.png (2.5 MB, 2048x1353, 2048:1353, ClipboardImage.png)

File: bf30272d2acca49⋯.png (663.96 KB, 1067x631, 1067:631, ClipboardImage.png)

>>16747587

Add this to the mix. Getty stock photo, 25-DEC-2013-T. This is an old find with which Anon found a match with the upper floor lighting on Millbank Tower in LisaMI6.

https://media.gettyimages.com/photos/the-sun-sets-across-westminster-and-the-london-eye-on-christmas-day-picture-id459313291?s=2048x2048

And this one.

https://www.gettyimages.ca/detail/photo/cityscape-at-night-royalty-free-image/601905855

Could Anons help confirm the date take for each?

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

fa237c  No.16748035

File: 0ce9a1a4d6dd641⋯.png (1.04 MB, 1055x652, 1055:652, ClipboardImage.png)

>>16748013

>>16748013

Anothe to date.

https://www.gettyimages.ca/detail/photo/illuminated-hungerford-bridge-and-golden-jubilee-royalty-free-image/686787501

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

fa237c  No.16748204

File: 8f29e2ecfe0273c⋯.png (2.71 MB, 2048x1353, 2048:1353, ClipboardImage.png)

File: 46cd8d7504db716⋯.png (1.22 MB, 2600x767, 200:59, ClipboardImage.png)

>>16747303 >>16748013 >>16747575

Getty Christmas Day pic provides close match with LisaMI6 and with 24London. There are differences, of course, and so these three pics taken together indicate a passage of time within the same narrow time interval.

>>16748013

Will refine these comparison pics but for now work in progress.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

fa237c  No.16748313

>>16748204

Okay, so we have four good views of Millibank Tower lights at night around Christmas week 2013.

So to revisit the foundation. Note the shroud behind Big Ben, in each of these pics. Blue Eye.

Also note the lights on/off status at the Speaker's apartment, corner of Westiminster Palace. LisaMI6 shows that building's interior lights off and no, or very dim, flood lights. This is matched in 24London and Getty 25-DEC-2013-T. The flood lights are on for >>16748035 and the interior lights are on for "Bright Sister" (middle pic in >>16747303 and middle pic in >>16747587 . Gonna suggest that where the floodlights are full on th Speaker's apartment, th epic was taken EARLIER than those with floodlights off; and same for the interior lights on vs off. This needs to be confirmed, natch.

Righto, next, compare the lights on Millibank Tower. >>16748204

Consider the upper level firt. The pattern holds across LisaMI6, 24London, 25-DEC-2013-T, and holds partially with >>16748035 in which one of the floors that are fully lit in the other pics is somewhat dimmed.

Next, the middle level floors. Unfortunately, in LisaMI6 this area is partially obscured by items between it and the camera. Still there is a discernible pattern that holds across LisaMI6, 25-DEC-2013, and >>16748035 . This does not hold in 24London and Bright Sister.

The best match may still be 24London (Purple Sister). However, we have a dated pic, 25-DEC-2013-T, provided by Getty stock photos. That pic is a gud match for LisaMI6, too. It may be a better match.

Then there is >>16748035 which needs to be firmly dated. It looks like a good match except for just one upper floor difference.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

fa237c  No.16748385

To stitch together this analysis of the EMB pics will be quite the challenge.

1)

22-DEC-2013-T provides gud Q-match for the row of buldings on the riverfront of Albert Embankment. This pic shows cranes that are very difficult to confirm in the Q pics, if at all. This pic is a daytime shot.

2)

25-DEC-2013-T from Getty is a gud match with Lisa-MI6 re Millibank Tower and the Speaker's apartment. Night shot.

We now have a series of open sauce pics that on their own show a range of changes within a time interval staked on 25-DEC-2013-T. And a series of pics of the Albert Embankment which reinforces 22-DEC-2013-T as a good proxy for examining the buildings in that location which is not well-captured in Q pics.

The pink/purple building is in each EMB night pic except for LisaMI6 because it is just out of camera frame. 24London provides a proxy for that aspect of the analysis. This building is out of frame of the other pics that show the Millibank Tower lights.

Two proxies: Chadwick 22-DEC-2013-T and 24London.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

3da09c  No.16748654

File: feed7bcf0d2186e⋯.png (772.24 KB, 1920x947, 1920:947, Screenshot_2022_07_17_at_0….png)

>>16748035

Earliest date given by TinEye is 16 Jan 2021

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

3da09c  No.16748734

File: b6799038eadfe3b⋯.jpg (200.14 KB, 1000x454, 500:227, 1000_F_87907541_SEYChLU4EJ….jpg)

TinEye says first found 6 December 2014. Notice the cranes on the left. The nearest St. George Tower has the big white floodlight, the one left has the white flood and a red for the two boom sections

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

fa237c  No.16748930

>>16748654

Thanks, anon.

Shroud on rooftop behind Bg Ben not present JAN 2021.

Tineye is not as good a resource as it once was.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

fa237c  No.16748997

>>16748734

That DEC-2014 [oc is a terrific find and helps to clarify the cranes in December 2013. The bright white light seen in 2013 pic is part of the boom/crane and so can confirm not a celestial object.

The pic you found also helps show differences in the skyline behind Westminster and differences on the rooftop of Westminster.

The cranes in DEC-2014 did not appear in Q pics so that's a good distinguisher. As is the changes in the shrouded rennovation work on the rooftop of Westminister. The shroud behind Big Ben was taken down early spring 2013; the work around the Lord Speaker's apartment (i.e. near the House of Lords) began that same spring of 2014.

The DEC-2014 pic also confirms the pink/ purple building's location.

Wonder if it was late afternoon or early morning when that DEC-2014 pic was taken?

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

fa237c  No.16749049

>>16748013

Another way to identify the relevant stock photos is by the photograher's name.

Justin Setterfield, 25-DEC-2013-T

https://media.128ducks.com/file_store/56ad217b16818d3b9151c942f6c2db2d1119658426f6a27ff7d443bbe27cf504.png

David Gonzalez, date not specified

https://media.128ducks.com/file_store/bf30272d2acca49233c831d703a98d84756a9d20c7b7c4784c6f76b3c850e98a.png

Nigel Allison, date not specified

https://media.128ducks.com/file_store/0ce9a1a4d6dd641716c37ab74c9ccbdac1aa9fc4ed79d44e8b95ca9926e1ccbb.png

Now, technically, all three of these have no specified date as per the online details that Getty provided, however, the first, JUSTIN, has Chrismas Day in its filename and the pic markers indicate DEC-2013.

On the other hand, these pics were taken from similar vantage and also in the same winter, as per the markers within the camera frames.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

fa237c  No.16749161

File: f6465f5169092d9⋯.png (3.03 MB, 2048x1365, 2048:1365, ClipboardImage.png)

>>16749049

Mike Kemp, Date created: 14 December, 2013

UK - London - South Bank View during the busy Christmas season towards the London Eye and Westminster

https://media.gettyimages.com/photos/view-of-the-southbank-during-the-busy-christmas-season-towards-the-picture-id527454362?s=2048x2048

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

fa237c  No.16749548

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Request for Anons:

Please show the following video to a normie. The purpose is to test this video for ease of comprehension. No audio so you might have to provide a very brief overview regarding, not the Q aspect, but the mapping of the three key markers, plus the PLAZA's main features.

Ask your normie to watch a video about the central Plaza at the major theme park of London UK. Ask them to look for a carousel, a big ferris wheel, and a special kind of rollercoaster ride. Tell them to be prepared to walk through the crowds, ride up a tower, and be flung about on a giant pendulum that is out of control. Kek. Then, show the video and observe their reactions.

Then ask your normie to map out on a piece of paper, or verbally, the main features of the PLAZA that they can recall offhand. Don't prompt them for the three main markers.

Next ask them to watch again and to look for the direction tree, the polar bears on a kiosk roof, and a place called Apres. Telll them that they can pause and rewind as much as they need to find those three things.

And, finally, query them about the 3 main markers that you had mentioned at the beginning. Just note their remarks and reactions.

This sort of testing of the normie viewership is something I've done myself and it gives me new eyes, actually.

Eventually whatever we learn from our London Pics digz and from Q regarding the significance of this series of pics, we will have the choice to spread the word widely. That is so for a huge swatch of the digz on Q drops on all kinds of topics and places. Think of this as preparation for ourselves but also for refining our approach to the most basic elements of communications for normies.

Cheers

PS Note that this is not brand new video but it has shown itself useful for the stated purpose. If you have another in mind, or an infographic, that does not focus on Q aspect but on viewer comprehension of important bits and pieces, then, by all means spearmint away and let me know how it goes.

Winter Wonderland, London UK, The Plaza and its attractions.

https://youtu.be/CpRGKZH4ZKE

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

018d56  No.16749553

File: 5b1b2ffdd9a66a6⋯.png (370.06 KB, 583x626, 583:626, ClipboardImage.png)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

3da09c  No.16749843

File: fab5a22924e7031⋯.jpg (189.44 KB, 1000x667, 1000:667, 1000_F_156615449_ol0ri5D72….jpg)

>>16748930

>Tineye is not as good a resource as it once was.

Agree with you there. Was looking last night at shutterstock and others. One pic looked like a possible comparison, our old friend TinEye said first found 1 Nov 2021. No Corniche, no Dumont

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

3da09c  No.16749877

File: f47bdadbb161f25⋯.png (324.48 KB, 600x420, 10:7, london_skyline_westminster….png)

This one is supposed to be first found 31 August, 2013

St George Tower not complete, but lower floors have the lights on

No demolition for Corniche or Dumont

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

9a2a5a  No.16750095

File: 926bd9211614c47⋯.png (8.55 KB, 318x98, 159:49, ClipboardImage.png)

Verified: TruthSocial is now accepting sign-ups from the UK.

https://truthsocial.com

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

fa237c  No.16752980

File: 70cc1abaa46ad92⋯.png (859.54 KB, 1328x642, 664:321, ClipboardImage.png)

>>16749843

The link?

Here is an enlargement of the area of interest. The date taken is prolly within or near the Q time interval, I think. So that clear view of the crane with the two red and one white light is relevant. It is a good ref for Millbank too.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

fa237c  No.16753025

File: bc7e7d653ba5c9c⋯.png (613.44 KB, 1101x581, 1101:581, ClipboardImage.png)

>>16749877

Link, fren?

The date take you cited is plausible. Demolition apparently took place in the Fall of 2013. We need better pictorial evidence and documentation on that, natch.

Here's another enlargement.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

fa237c  No.16753143

File: 90b6e59a31784d2⋯.png (1.99 MB, 1355x696, 1355:696, ClipboardImage.png)

>>16747817

GE-MAR-2012

Imagery Date: 8/2/2011

View Location: 51°29'27.88" N 0°07'18.01" W

Been meaning to inquire about the date information on these GooEarth views. As you can see, the User Interface displayed 03/2012 while at the foot of the view is displayed imagery date of 8/2/2011

This view is "upside down" from the other images posted which show the facades. The activity behind the facades turns out to be significant in the next image but, more importantly, the shadows and such seem, to me at least, more easy to interpret from this side.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

fa237c  No.16753358

File: cbdc7600a327ef8⋯.png (1.36 MB, 1360x699, 1360:699, ClipboardImage.png)

>>16753143

GE-JUL-2013

Imagery Date: 18-JUL-2013

View Location: 51°29'27.88" N 0°07'18.01" W

Also close-up view of start of demolition.

51°29'26.92" N 0°07'18.99" W

From this we can infer that the crane was erected in JUL-2013 but work on the building facade was not evident until the appearance of the hoarding as per SV-AUG-2013 (posted above) >>16747817 and as per the date taken on shutterstock photo (posted above) >>16749877 and as per closeup >>16753025 we can infer that demolition on the buiding began sometime in SEP-2013.

We are missing pictorial evidence for SEP-2013, however, we have the gap captured in Chadwick 22-DEC-2013-T which serves as a proxy to compare with other images which Chadwick took the same day with the related pics discussed above including 25-DEC-2013-T.

We also have an obscured view from Chadwick 28-SEP-2013 (posted above) >>16705019 which shows cranes at Albert Embankment.

All told, we have a time interval for the appearance of cranes at night with 28-SEP-2013 as a stake in the ground, rather than an actual bookend. The NOT BEFORE, just for the night lights on cranes, appears to be mid JUL-2013 - around the same time that the particular crane first appeared to be setting up in GE-JUL-2013 (Imagery date 18-JUL-2013).

That crane may be fully setup, IDK. Its lights may be ready to be lit-up for night time. If it was, then, there might yet be evidence of its lights over Albert Embankment during the summer of 2013. However, the SV-AUG-2013 images did not show the crane yet.

So we have evidence of the gap and we have evidence of crane lights. As mentioned earlier, this is useful information for comparing with proxies for the Q pics.

Can Anons discern cranes in the Q pics over Albert Embankment? Might the work on these buildings have been done and the crane removed by sometime before Christmas week? Moved, perhaps, to another project farther behind Albert Embankment such that red lit cranes reappear in the vicinity, as seen from vicinity of Q cameras, after the Q interval? This might explain the pictorial evidence but it is only speculation at this point.

All of that goes by the wayside if there are cranes evident in Q pics.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

fa237c  No.16753413

File: f833344f4085d51⋯.png (2.03 MB, 1357x695, 1357:695, ClipboardImage.png)

>>16753358

Sorry, here's the GE-JUL-2013 pic.

Its closeup was posted alone. >>16753358

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

fa237c  No.16753504

File: 918766af02331d8⋯.png (1.04 MB, 1360x699, 1360:699, ClipboardImage.png)

File: 26ff91ad8f85b5e⋯.png (981.76 KB, 1352x677, 1352:677, ClipboardImage.png)

>>16753358

Another close-up, GE-JUL-2013.

I don't think there is hoarding to match that in SV-AUG-2013 >>16747817 .

But in that SV imagery there is a low crane just visible above the height of the buldings there.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

fa237c  No.16753525

File: a57fea9a975e43a⋯.png (1.63 MB, 1360x699, 1360:699, ClipboardImage.png)

Four cranes.

GE-AUG-2013.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

fa237c  No.16753556

File: f46caa0432ba69d⋯.png (1015.08 KB, 1353x678, 451:226, ClipboardImage.png)

>>16753525

Four cranes.

SV-AUG-2013.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

fa237c  No.16753575

File: 8c777110e4f4528⋯.png (175.86 KB, 482x559, 482:559, ClipboardImage.png)

File: 4d96e61160c8963⋯.png (1.15 MB, 1360x699, 1360:699, ClipboardImage.png)

>>16753556

Is this crane being assembled?

Pre-facade-hoarding, perhaps?

I don't see signs of deconstruction, yet.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

fa237c  No.16753687

File: f92b5eccbc5fadb⋯.png (1.54 MB, 1355x677, 1355:677, ClipboardImage.png)

SV-JUL-2014

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

fa237c  No.16753747

File: 432e6d1e42a42cb⋯.png (1.38 MB, 1350x675, 2:1, ClipboardImage.png)

>>16753687

SV-JUL-2014

The Corniche gap.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

fa237c  No.16753773

>>16753687 >>16753747

General area of interest in SV-JUL-2014.

https://www.google.com/maps/@51.4917844,-0.1220129,3a,75y,139.49h,113.14t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1sof4KpkidSnmVioYODEiirw!2e0!5s20140601T000000!7i13312!8i6656

SV-JUN-2012.

https://www.google.com/maps/@51.491779,-0.1220215,3a,75y,139.49h,113.14t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1sVApn8pD4IHJIMr0UGB5xZQ!2e0!5s20120601T000000!7i13312!8i6656

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

fa237c  No.16753783

File: f92b5eccbc5fadb⋯.png (1.54 MB, 1355x677, 1355:677, ClipboardImage.png)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

fa237c  No.16753808

>>16753747

The SV view of JUL-2014 showed lower cranes. This might contribute to the plausibility that taller cranes were used to demolish in the Fall and that these were replaced or modified such that the cranes would not appear above the height of the buildings during Christmas week - and thus explain the non-appearance of crane lights over Albert Embankment in the Q pics.

Another simple explanation could be that the crane lights were obscured by the treecover along Victoria Embankment.

And so we must make the most of the proxies that are currently available to us for Christmas week, or around that time.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

fa237c  No.16754266

File: 31ba605bf8a4133⋯.png (406 KB, 640x399, 640:399, ClipboardImage.png)

File: ebc6e17f76cbba2⋯.png (580.35 KB, 1188x454, 594:227, ClipboardImage.png)

>>16753808

Up river to Westminster Bridge

Chadwick, 22-DEC-2013

https://www.geograph.org.uk/photo/3816144

And a closelup modified to enhance view of the cranes and buiding profiles.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

fa237c  No.16754281

File: 04ff2a0fd4446ee⋯.png (400.26 KB, 591x442, 591:442, ClipboardImage.png)

File: ecdacb68af65f29⋯.png (511.47 KB, 591x442, 591:442, ClipboardImage.png)

>>16753808

NSA_Traf_CAM_LONDON2847

Also a modified version to bring out the treecover which obscures the view of Albert Embankment.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

fa237c  No.16754319

File: 13cb3afe4425e79⋯.png (417.11 KB, 591x434, 591:434, ClipboardImage.png)

File: 429ce3294dc8245⋯.png (491.01 KB, 591x434, 591:434, ClipboardImage.png)

>>16753808

NSA_Traf_CAM_ROT1 - 1423

Also modified exposure which reveals the treecover that somewhat obscures view of Albert Embankment.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

fa237c  No.16754392

>>16754319

Zoomed-in to the pink/ purple building, 18 Albert Embankment, it is possible to discern the white horizontal lights of the ground level there; and the shape of the bright building appears to conform to the shape prior to the rennovations that took place starting the following year. Beyond that, there appear to be no cranes over that area of interest.

Would the treecover alone account for no red crane lights? IDK.

Why would such a detail be scrutinize, you might ask. Well, the cranes stood there, as per Chadwick 22-DEC-2013, but their red lights do not appear in the Q pics. This discrepancy can not be explained, I think now, by a lull in the work being done in that area, nor by a change in the cranes, UNLESS such occurred AFTER 22-DEC-2013.

And if that is the case, then, those lights are marker for further refinement of the time interval bookends for EMB pics.

If instead there is an explanation, or evidence, that shows some other factor that would make those lights subdued, and thus obscured completely by the treecover on Victoria Embankment, or were turned off or otherwise removed from view, then that too could provide a new marker.

Having taken this dig as far as it seems possible, at this time, I am going to drop the crane and purple-building dig and turn to other possible refinements of the EMB time interval. for instance, there may be more than one such interval for this subset of the London Pics. Analysis of the traffic provides something that may do the trick.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

fa237c  No.16754461

File: 17d5456e4c74e66⋯.png (1.67 MB, 3200x767, 3200:767, ClipboardImage.png)

>>16754392

Should add that, of course, the use of proxies to analyze the Millibank Tower lights, and the stake in the ground represented by Setterfield 25-DEC-2013-T, may suffice to narrow the time interval to two or three days/nights.

Here is a series of DEC-2013 pics, plus a summer pic, of those lights. These closeups come from the pics posted upthread. Will refine later but for now can Anons rank these in terms of closeness of a match with LisaMI6? Observs?

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

fa237c  No.16754564

File: 56c844437b899d9⋯.png (954.19 KB, 1024x768, 4:3, ClipboardImage.png)

Picadilly Circus Snowglobe

Chadwick, 22-DEC-2013

https://www.geograph.org.uk/photo/3786715

Note the lack of heavy traffic, if any. Light pedestrian traffic, too. Time of day?

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

fa237c  No.16754678

File: 35d5ca6c5646db3⋯.png (1.05 MB, ClipboardImage.png)

>>16747575

Fair to say that some of us have been curious about the source of the bright lighting that caused 18 Alberta Embankment to shine pink or purple (or bue for that matter). Well take a close look at the SV-MAY-2012 windows. They are covered by a layer of glass mounted to the facade. And between that layer and the windows there is what looks like a series of a type of flood light that might have been capable of throwing different hues of illumination against the layer of glass panels. Speculating.

https://www.google.com/maps/@51.491739,-0.1216146,3a,64y,183.62h,138.22t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1siQ8uq0lilKrF_6nXmZI3wg!2e0!5s20120501T000000!7i13312!8i6656

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

fa237c  No.16754723

File: 35d5ca6c5646db3⋯.png (1.05 MB, 1354x678, 677:339, ClipboardImage.png)

>>16747575

Fair to say that some of us have been curious about the source of the bright lighting that caused 18 Alberta Embankment to shine pink or purple (or bue for that matter). Well take a close look at the SV-MAY-2012 windows. They are covered by a layer of glass mounted to the facade. And between that layer and the windows there is what looks like a series of a type of flood light that might have been capable of throwing different hues of illumination against the layer of glass panels. Speculating.

https://www.google.com/maps/@51.491739,-0.1216146,3a,64y,183.62h,138.22t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1siQ8uq0lilKrF_6nXmZI3wg!2e0!5s20120501T000000!7i13312!8i6656

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

fa237c  No.16754735

File: eb0265e8aab5b50⋯.png (1.13 MB, 1348x682, 674:341, ClipboardImage.png)

>>16754678

View of the glass panels from the other side of 18 Embankment. Maybe the floodlights shone directly onto the facade, which does not look like actual brick.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

fa237c  No.16755363

File: 4a801ccd2daff0e⋯.png (144.54 KB, 312x274, 156:137, ClipboardImage.png)

>>16753504

Maybe there was some hoarding in place by SV-AUG-2013 / GE-AUG-2013. Doesn't appear to have been rapped around the riverside of the building in the GE pic; if so, then, the SE pic was captured AFTER the GE sat image.

Several months later, the SE-JUN-2014 images captured rather low crane work in the gap left behind by the demolition of 20 Albert Embankment (aka Hampton House).

https://media.128ducks.com/file_store/55cc746779addacdb15ceebf05d61b459d11099f6c19be5c59efef734ba38a79.png

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

fa237c  No.16755656

File: ff406a27367dd70⋯.png (63.26 KB, 1210x484, 5:2, ClipboardImage.png)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

fa237c  No.16755658

File: c30e86f30103751⋯.png (63.42 KB, 1207x492, 1207:492, ClipboardImage.png)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

fa237c  No.16755666

File: 1722f95905e7eae⋯.png (65.51 KB, 1212x493, 1212:493, ClipboardImage.png)

https://www.alamy.com/stock-photo/london%2C-uk-24nd-december-2013.html?imgt=0

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

fa237c  No.16755674

File: 7197622f080abb0⋯.png (65.58 KB, 1206x490, 603:245, ClipboardImage.png)

>>16755666

https://www.alamy.com/stock-photo/london%2C-uk-25nd-december-2013.html?imgt=0

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

fa237c  No.16755875

File: 51abe0434eae5ce⋯.png (441.98 KB, 755x588, 755:588, ClipboardImage.png)

Crowne Plaza hotel to open on Albert Embankment, 27 September 2013

https://www.london-se1.co.uk/news/view/7106

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

fa237c  No.16755879

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

fa237c  No.16755895

File: 7a1355058b4d88b⋯.png (388.5 KB, 696x579, 232:193, ClipboardImage.png)

>>16755875

Albert Embankment: rooftop club overlooking Parliament approved/ 7 August 2016

Plans for a rooftop private members' club on Albert Embankment with views of the Houses of Parliament have been approved by Lambeth councillors.

A representative of the 9 Albert Embankment Residents' Association reminded the committee that the council had received more than a hundred objections to the proposal, which was effectively for an open-air bar 10 metres from families' homes.

Paul Thelwell of Cannon Corporate UK told the committee that the roof terrace would create a further 26 jobs in addition to the jobs linked to the main hotel operation.

He said that the hotel will be "aimed at discerning customers who want peace and quiet from their hotel experience" and the club is for "our guests and a small number of hotel club members".

Prince's ward councillor Joanne Simpson urged the committee to impose conditions on the planning permission to safeguard her constituents from noise "all day, every day".

Cannon Corporate UK is owned by Mudhar Shawkat, a former member of the Iraqi parliament and opponent of Saddam Hussain who now has Canadian nationality.

Last year Mudhar Shawkat called for the creation of a 10,000-strong Sunni army in Iraq to take on the so-called Islamic State.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

fa237c  No.16755898

>>16755895

https://www.london-se1.co.uk/news/view/8868

For emphasis:

Cannon Corporate UK is owned by Mudhar Shawkat, a former member of the Iraqi parliament and opponent of Saddam Hussain who now has Canadian nationality.

Last year Mudhar Shawkat called for the creation of a 10,000-strong Sunni army in Iraq to take on the so-called Islamic State.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

fa237c  No.16755927

>>16755895

Albert Embankment Residents' Association

11 December 2013

https://se11actionteam.blogspot.com/2013/12/victory-for-residents-8-albert.html

Park Plaza's bid to grow taller deferred by Planning Committee, 1 May 2013

https://se11actionteam.blogspot.com/2013/05/park-plazas-bid-to-grow-taller-deferred.html

ast night Lambeth's Planning Committee spent an hour and 40 minutes considering the Park Plaza Hotel's bid to add several storeys to the front of their building. Objectors representing residents of 9 Albert Embankment and Salamanca Place did an excellent job questioning the effect the extension will have on light to their homes (which are already some of the darkest and most enclosed residential areas in the borough). In the end the Committee decided they couldn't make a decision because the information the hotel and the council officers were providing on daylight wasn't clear enough.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

fa237c  No.16755937

File: 43faf07ff01987f⋯.png (433.51 KB, 396x630, 22:35, ClipboardImage.png)

>>16755927

Albert Embankment "stealth bomber" hotel extension approved, 24 July 2013

https://www.london-se1.co.uk/news/view/6992

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

fa237c  No.16755950

>>16755937

For emphasis:

The committee agreed to the plans with three votes in favour, one against and three absentions.

Later in the evening a proposal to vary an existing permission for the redevelopment of Wah Kwong House at 10 Albert Embankment, to allow for the new building to operate as an hotel rather than the agreed apart-hotel was approved…

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

fa237c  No.16756137

File: 383c414f36aef7c⋯.png (137.81 KB, 993x631, 993:631, ClipboardImage.png)

File: ed43ab150cf1439⋯.png (425.38 KB, 495x545, 99:109, ClipboardImage.png)

File: 513c1d59d5880ed⋯.png (1.11 MB, 970x781, 970:781, ClipboardImage.png)

File: db2c61654361410⋯.png (42.08 KB, 264x575, 264:575, ClipboardImage.png)

PUBLISHED: 09:09 EDT, 22 December 2013 | UPDATED: 09:55 EDT, 23 December 2013

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2527889/The-soggy-Christmas-getaway-Motorists-warned-heavy-rain-80mph-winds-river-bursts-bank-York-city-centre.html

Millions have had their plans for the Christmas getaway thrown into complete chaos today as a violent storm has hit western Britain and will spread eastwards across the UK over the next 24 hours.

Railway stations and airports are already filling up with passengers after they were urged to bring forward their journeys so they can get home before the bad weather sets in across the majority of the UK this afternoon.

The Met Office has issued a severe weather warning running into Christmas Eve because of gale force gusts of up to 80mph and flooding caused by torrential rain. Gusts of up to 70mph have already been recorded.

The storm will hit in two waves, first peaking across the UK this afternoon, with a slight lull in the evening before wind and rain intensifies again overnight before clearing on Christmas Eve morning.

Many train operators are offering customers the chance to use any pre-booked tickets for travel on earlier trains in order to avoid the expected disruption, with hundreds of cancellations expected during the evening rush hour.

And if the trains do run journeys are likely to be substantially lengthened as a nationwide train 'go slow' of 50mph is likely to be imposed.

The severe weather warnings are in place until 9am on Christmas Eve, threatening to cause localised flooding across southern England and Wales, particularly in areas which have already experienced plenty of rain in recent weeks with the ground already saturated.

'We have a rainfall warning all the way through to 9am tomorrow morning and we're expecting in the region of 30 to 40mm, particularly over Dartmoor' said a Met Office spokesman.

Taking its toll: The strong winds cause a tree trunk to fall and crush a van on Cannings Road in East Croydon, London

Taking its toll: The strong winds cause a tree trunk to fall and crush a van on Cannings Road in East Croydon, London

'The wind is probably the main feature, and we'll see the wind pick up across the south. They will be gales really, everywhere across southern and central areas.

'The real focus for the strongest winds will be in the South East and all along the south coast today - there will be severe gales.

'We will be asking people if their travel is really essential - of course today will be the worst day for travel with the holiday period getting underway, it's the worst possible time.'

Meanwhile, Winter Wonderland in Hyde Park, Central London, will be closed today due to the high winds.

Many operators removed limits on day tickets for today in an effort to stop customers travelling today when 50mph speed restrictions are likely to be in place.

Robin Gisby, for Network Rail, said: ‘Our fundamental concern over the next 48 hours is to get everyone where they want to be for Christmas.’

He added: ‘I want to be very clear that our priority is running as many trains as we can safely, rather than worrying about hitting the timetable bang on.’

The worst of the weather is expected to clear by the end of Christmas Eve.

Those looking to make an early getaway have been hit by minor problems, with some England to France ferries delayed due to poor weather.

And train companies looked ahead to today, advising customers to plan their journeys around the heavy winds to avoid disruption.

East Coast is halving services from teatime today - with just four trains an hour instead of the usual eight in and out of London King’s Cross.

It warned disruption would continue for two days well into Christmas Eve.

The news means up to 2,400 passengers an hour will be left stranded.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

fa237c  No.16756217

File: 5c03e9010cb3ac6⋯.png (371.11 KB, 693x339, 231:113, ClipboardImage.png)

View from the Pentagon, NIOC.

http://www.watersidetours.co.uk/images/trips/uk-tours-2022-london-weekend/london-vista.jpg

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

f6e38f  No.16756320

Morning Britfags. Do any of you have the links to Q Research UK for the very earliest posts? I'm specifically looking for a memo between the head of MI6 and then foreign sec Boris Johnson, discussing his permission to spy on Trump.

Do we have that memo?

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

fa237c  No.16756368

File: be230328a1b4dd4⋯.png (942.87 KB, 1275x1650, 17:22, ClipboardImage.png)

>>16756320

Question everything.

https://img.4plebs.org/boards/pol/image/1498/16/1498161289904.jpg

https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/130966071/#130966071

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

fa237c  No.16756376

"Within 90 minutes of the letter’s being posted to 4chan, most users there concluded that it was a forgery."

https://medium.com/dfrlab/online-lies-about-spies-b1f5fb86aed4

FWIW

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

3da09c  No.16758602

>>16756137

< with a slight lull in the evening before wind and rain intensifies again overnight before clearing on Christmas Eve morning

What a great candidate for the embankment pics.

The buses would have been parked, TATTERSHALLCASTLE and HISPANIOLA would have been closed for safety reasons.

The Thames would be high due to the run-off.

Not a great many people would be out and about during that lull.

A couple up to clandestine activities would be taking advantage of the lack of people

I'd certainly want to ride out a big storm at a five-star hotel, certainly if at taxpayer expense.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

0768f1  No.16761329

File: 3c3269dc70eb0b5⋯.jpeg (254.24 KB, 1504x1200, 94:75, A8319ABB_81A5_43BD_AB65_A….jpeg)

>>16730686

^^^^^^^^^^^^

Surprisingly average recorded high tides that week.

>>16758602

Tidal forces from the Moon can sometimes weigh against that abnormal runoff. For instance, in our case the Moon is likely at or near 3rd quarter. So it’s position is contrary to solar influence which can pull the water to the sides of the earth. And if occurring at just the right time to defeat any rain flooding influence, you know who’s gonna win out.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

3da09c  No.16764648

Britain swelters on its hottest day ever as temperatures hit 40C

By Kate Holton and Sachin Ravikumar July 19, 20222:38 PM EDT

LONDON, July 19 (Reuters) - Britain recorded its hottest day ever on Tuesday, with the temperature exceeding 40C (104F) as a heatwave gripping Europe intensified, forcing train tracks to buckle and fuelling a spate of fires across London.

The Met Office said a new provisional record temperature of 40.3C (104.5F) was recorded in Coningsby, in central England, with 34 sites across the country experiencing temperatures in excess of the previous high of 38.7C (101.7F) recorded in 2019.

Advertisement · Scroll to continue

Stephen Belcher at the Met Office said he had not expected to see such temperatures in Britain in his career.

"Research conducted here at the Met Office has demonstrated that it's virtually impossible for the UK to experience 40C in an undisrupted climate but climate change driven by greenhouse gases has made these extreme temperatures possible," he said.

Train services on major routes from London up the east and west coast of the country were cancelled, electricity companies reported mass outages and normally busy city centres appeared quiet. Network Rail tweeted a number of pictures showing large bends and kinks in rail tracks.

London Fire Brigade declared a major incident and urged people to stop having barbecues, as hundreds of firefighters battled blazes across the capital.

To the east, a large fire engulfed homes in the village of Wennington, with flames tearing across about 40 hectares (100 acres) of neighbouring tinder-dry fields. Elsewhere large grassland areas around the capital caught fire, billowing smoke over major roads and nearby areas.

'DO NOT TRAVEL'

Transport minister Grant Shapps said there had been a considerable amount of travel disruption.

"Infrastructure, much of which was built from the Victorian times, just wasn't built to withstand this type of temperature," he said.

Operator Network Rail advised passengers to only travel if absolutely necessary.

"Extreme Heat: All services stopped. Do not come to the station," Avanti West Coast, which runs services from London to cities such as Liverpool, Manchester and Glasgow, said on Twitter.

Climate scientists said the once-unthinkable temperature in London was likely to become more common in coming years.

Sony Kapoor, a climate and macro-economic professor at European University Institute, said he had long thought that people underestimated the physical impacts of climate change in contemporary times. "But even I never thought we would see 40 degree Celsius in London in 2022," he said.

The arrival of a searing heatwave that first sparked wildfires across Europe before arriving in Britain has turned the spotlight on to "net zero" pledges made by the candidates running to replace Boris Johnson as prime minister.

After Johnson championed the move to net zero status when Britain held the United Nations COP26 climate change summit in 2021, some of the candidates to replace him have appeared more lukewarm and rated other challenges facing the country as their priority.

After Tuesday's heat, the Met Office said the temperature would fall on Wednesday, however it warned there could be heavy thunderstorms.

More:

https://www.reuters.com/world/uk/after-warmest-night-britain-braces-record-temperature-2022-07-19/

"Research conducted here at the Met Office has demonstrated that it's virtually impossible for the UK to experience 40C in an undisrupted climate but climate change driven by greenhouse gases has made these extreme temperatures possible," Research conducted by who, when, and how?

"Network Rail tweeted a number of pictures showing large bends and kinks in rail tracks." Are those rails made of lead?

"Climate scientists said the once-unthinkable temperature in London was likely to become more common in coming years." Climate scientists say, but give one name

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

3da09c  No.16764764

>>16753358

That crane is mobile, on treads. I can tell by the wider boom and the big counterweights

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

4c9878  No.16764773

As one.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

4c9878  No.16764785

Slap stik

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

3da09c  No.16765067

File: 61591e0f353d60c⋯.jpg (95.52 KB, 321x480, 107:160, A088_05312_Tracked_mobile_….jpg)

>>16753808

<contribute to the plausibility that taller cranes were used to demolish in the Fall and that these were replaced or modified such that the cranes would not appear above the height of the buildings during Christmas week

I agree, those big tower cranes are expensive and once the building has been made low enough the tower units can go elsewhere and mobile ones brought in, Here's a mobile crane working in Bishopsgate, London

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

3da09c  No.16765628

>>16754392

Please see"

>>16719993 Four cranes 10-AUG-2013-T The one to the left of the Crowne Plaza is there, but lights not visible, had to enlarge the image to see it

Those tower cranes are not installed overnight. Perhaps that August night the structure was filly assembled onsite but power not yet connected?

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

fa237c  No.16766154

File: 9d021bc42ef54d2⋯.png (19.6 KB, 439x128, 439:128, ClipboardImage.png)

>>16764764

Noice observ.

>>16765067

So plausible, yes. And perhaps AFTER 22-DEC-2013 these cranes became unlit or moved from site; which would help explain the lack of red lights in the Q pics where Chadwick's pic shows there were cranes above height of the surrounding buidings. The gap in Cahdwick's pic, and others that week, showed the gap. This all hangs together, specualtively, and all we would need is a pic or somesuch to indicate and reifnorce within that time interval.

Could imagine making changes on site, removing cranes or lowering them with lights off or disconnected, prior to the immediate days surrounding Christmas/NYE.

Kewel that this line of thought brings us back toward Christmas Day (and possibly toward but not on NYE). Feels like the time interval been drawn tighter now.

We may not find the pictorial evidence needed, but now we know clearly what we might find if we come across it.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

3da09c  No.16766354

Helicopter crashes into crane on London tower, kills two

By Michael Holden, Brenda Goh 16 January 2013

LONDON (Reuters) - A helicopter crashed into a crane on top of one of Europe’s tallest residential blocks on Wednesday, killing two people as it burst into flames and spiralled down into rush-hour traffic close to the Houses of Parliament in central London.

Police said there was nothing to suggest a terrorism link to the crash on a foggy morning on the south bank of the River Thames, less than a mile from Britain’s parliament, its secret services headquarters and the site of a new U.S. embassy.

In parliament, later in the day, Prime Minister David Cameron said helicopter flights over a city with an increasing number of huge skyscrapers needed to be carefully examined.

“There was a big bang and bits started showering down, then there was an explosion down the road,” said truck driver Ray Watts whose vehicle was hit by falling debris.

“We saw the fireball down there and the smoke. We didn’t know what way to run because there were bits coming down everywhere.”

Witnesses said the helicopter hit a crane on top of the as-yet unoccupied 185-metre (200-yard) high cylindrical block - The Tower, One St George Wharf - spun out of control, fell to the ground and burst into flames, setting nearby buildings alight.

Wreckage was strewn across roads close to Vauxhall train station, a major transport hub near the south bank of the River Thames, which was packed with thousands of commuters at the time of the incident shortly after 0800 GMT.

A Reuters reporter at the scene said tangled bits of crane could be seen hanging off the side of the tower, the top of which was still shrouded by low cloud an hour after the crash.

“It is something of a miracle that this was not many, many times worse given the time of day that this happened,” police Commander Neil Basu told reporters. The fire service said it had rescued one man from a burning car.

Basu said the helicopter was believed to be flying from Redhill, south of the capital, to Elstree, home to famous British film studios north of London, but had been diverted to a heliport near the crash site.

The metropolitan police later confirmed it was a scheduled commercial flight.

The pilot, named as 50-year-old Peter Barnes, was killed. There were no passengers, the police said. Another man, 39-year-old Matthew Wood, was found dead near the wreckage. Five others were taken to hospital for minor injuries and seven were treated at the scene.

The helicopter involved was an Italian-made twin-engined AgustaWestland 109, the company’s best selling VIP corporate helicopter, according to a source familiar with the situation.

Edmir Pishtar, who was in a van outside the site, said he spoke to the operator who was about to get into the crane cab.

“He was literally shaking because he was getting ready to climb into the crane and he was late,” Pishtar said.

Roads around the area including a route over the Thames were closed off, and bus and rail services were affected.

More:

https://www.reuters.com/article/uk-britain-helicopter-crash-idUKBRE90F0EY20130116

This bit from the BBC:

The Civil Aviation Authority said a warning about the crane involved in the crash had been issued to pilots in October and again on 7 January.

But it confirmed that red aviation warning lights on tall structures only need to be turned on at night - and not during bad weather in daylight hours - because they are not visible in fog or low cloud.

The rules mean the period defined as night would have ended about 30 minutes before the crash.

Where the rules on crane lighting every changed? Where flight paths and minimum altitudes changed instead?

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

b52457  No.16767219

>>16766154

Re the red lights: Are they a constant red light? Or can they be a slow flashing?

I think the subject came up in the discussion of the red lights atop or behind the MILLBANK bldg to explain why a red light is seen in one picture but not seen in another of the EMB pics.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

b52457  No.16767234

>>16767219

Well I guess that’s a dumb question re the cranes at least because anons would have already mentioned any differences in the EMB/LISA pics re the number of crane lights seen.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

3da09c  No.16767246

>>16767234

Not a dumb question at all. To my knowledge the red lights are constant, but I am not experienced in UK construction regulations. I have to go with the crane lights don't flash.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

b52457  No.16767266

>>16749161

Well, this pic (14DEC2013) is definitely a Q match for ROT1 which shows the (2) red lights of the cranes behind LondonEye.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

fa237c  No.16767268

>>16767219

>>16767266

https://www.caa.co.uk/

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

fa237c  No.16767276

File: ca5ba1eadd203f5⋯.png (746.24 KB, 1292x624, 323:156, ClipboardImage.png)

>>16754319

NSA_Traf_CAM_ROT1 - 1423

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

fa237c  No.16767284

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

b52457  No.16767292

>>16749161

>>16767266

>>16767276

Behind LEye. Those cranes match.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

fa237c  No.16767295

File: fc5c011ec24e6b5⋯.png (1.07 MB, 1278x646, 639:323, ClipboardImage.png)

File: 87f8b1186e85cc1⋯.png (838.7 KB, 1273x654, 1273:654, ClipboardImage.png)

>>16767276

>>16767276

NSA_Traf_CAM_ROT1 - 1423

Exposure lightened.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

b52457  No.16767299

File: 0bfccdd410a8480⋯.jpeg (127.83 KB, 271x473, 271:473, 221AB7FB_664D_4404_B66F_0….jpeg)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

fa237c  No.16767304

>>16767292 amd >>16767299

Right on. Fantastic use of that proxy linked to ROT1. Love it.

What do you think of the halfmast flag? >>16749161

We have red crane lights behind The Eye but not at the same time there appeared to be no red lights near 18 Albert Embankment. None.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

fa237c  No.16767309

>>16767304

https://www.gov.uk/guidance/designated-days-for-union-flag-flying

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

3da09c  No.16767324

>>16754392

I see one crane in both >>16754291 (NSA_Traf_CAM_LONDON2847) and >>16754319 (NSA_Traf_CAM_ROT1 - 1423) (second pics enlarged I spot the white floodlight and the red light at the end of the boom, look carefully over the left-most streetlight)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

fa237c  No.16767332

>>16747587

Three photos, prolly close in time, show no flags over Westminster Palace.

https://www.businessinsider.com/flags-fly-half-mast-london-terror-attack-victims-westminster-houses-parliament-2017-3

Perhaps we can find another proxy that captured other flags half-masted near the site/s within camera frames of the Q pics?

Reference:

https://www.businessinsider.com/flags-fly-half-mast-london-terror-attack-victims-westminster-houses-parliament-2017-3

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

fa237c  No.16767344

File: fb93c140219edfe⋯.png (770.24 KB, 1288x579, 1288:579, ClipboardImage.png)

File: e39b6b4cb1b1cf7⋯.png (618.93 KB, 1226x540, 613:270, ClipboardImage.png)

>>16767324

>>16767324

The red circled areas? IDK.

The white circle is where would expect to see at least one of the cranes in area of interest on Albert Embankment, yes?

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

3da09c  No.16767348

>>16767344

Affirmative, the red circled areas. There's a crane there

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

fa237c  No.16767357

>>16767348

Can you "map" it to one of the pics upbread that show cranes in the area? This is progress, certainly. The location may be a bit too far from the target area but this is already close to finding more than we knew we had, I think.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

fa237c  No.16767381

File: 4de606c3c632e47⋯.png (767.1 KB, 1338x467, 1338:467, ClipboardImage.png)

>>16767348

What is perplexing is the presence of red crane lights in other areas than the part of the Albert Embankment near the pink/ purple building. We know there were cranes there, on 22-DEC-2013-T, based on Chadwick at the very least.

And there were other red crane lights just out of frame of the Q pics, as well.

>>16749161

Are we empty-handed for red crane lighrts in night shots of the target area? there might have been just one but I think there prolly were four. Certainly that one behind the old site of Hampton House - the gap in the riverfront buidings.

Maybe time to hunt in Jan 2014 for these red crane lights.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

fa237c  No.16767384

>>16767381

By the way, that half-masted flag might have been in process of being raised or lowered and, then, not actually half-masted. The banner seems full of wind, too. Shows wind direction?

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

3da09c  No.16767403

>>16767357

Best guess would be these:

>>16748734, >>16752980

I'd like to rule out the one in far left of >>16704415 as too high

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

b52457  No.16767410

>>16767304

>What do you think of the halfmast flag?

Would need to first establish it is their practice to leave said flag up during evening hours. These are usually lit by floodlight per custom.

If that flag is always flown, 24hrs, then I might start to think some VIP had passed away.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

3da09c  No.16767429

File: 3cd7ecb143e319f⋯.png (143.23 KB, 360x254, 180:127, thames_river_in_london_at_….png)

Shutterstock, TinEye says first found 28 April, 2014

https://www.shutterstock.com/image-photo/view-vauxhall-bridge-center-london-night-189181721?

Two cranes to far right, looks like hoarding on those buildings demolished for the Corniche

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

3da09c  No.16767481

File: c3d53ab7726fedb⋯.jpg (71.26 KB, 481x720, 481:720, Millbank_Tower_6.jpg)

https://www.mrsmithworldphotography.com/colour-photographs-of-london-landmarks/millbank-tower

This is #6 in the set

Tineye first found 24 Dec, 2015

Four, maybe five cranes behind the Millbank Tower. One crane with horizntal boom visible in Vauxhall to left of St George Tower

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

2b0e5f  No.16767498

>>16767219

Tall building & cranes etc are required to have red anti-collision lights. These are similar to the flashing red anti-collision lights fitted to aircraft.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

b52457  No.16768134

File: cea11688aa7a786⋯.jpeg (122.02 KB, 286x522, 143:261, 75CC153C_0D2D_47E5_87FA_7….jpeg)

>>16754392

>Having taken this dig as far as it seems possible, at this time, I am going to drop the crane and purple-building dig and turn to other possible refinements

I was just getting caught up. Could anon please give a short synopsis of the crane dig so far?

Not sure if anons have already noticed it but anon’s modification of ROT1 brings out what seems to be a red light (picrel) not seen in the original. Is that a crane?

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

89794b  No.16768231

File: 642b9e7d523f720⋯.jpg (86.65 KB, 1280x1280, 1:1, FYFeVDLX0AEN0Vo.jpg)

3 candidates left to replace Boris Johnson in the UK.

All Claus Schwab puppets ….

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

b52457  No.16768602

>>16767498

Thx fren. Appreciate the input.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

b52457  No.16768747

File: a5f13265ced860e⋯.jpeg (80.82 KB, 481x720, 481:720, C793B8AE_D21B_453A_8718_1….jpeg)

>>16767344

So if the lights are on a long slow flash these two pics may show why an apparent red crane light is seen in one pic and not another. See also the red light atop MILLBANK (or that tall round bldg behind it?). There in one pic but not in the other.

If we think on a string of random slow blinking Christmas lights, there might be times when we see most or all lit. Of course the professional pics with even a minimal time lapse should probly catch them all. But a quick snap photographer taking surveillance pics in quick sequence might catch one or more crane lights/building lights in the darkened moment if slow flashing as our fren below has said. >>16767498

Some food for thought. It does explain the unlit red MILLBANK roof light in one? of the EMB pics.

And see this stock pic with what appears one crane light unlit. See how you can still make out current ripples in the water? The long exposure pics blur this out. >>16767481

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

b52457  No.16769231

>>16748013

>Could Anons help confirm the date take for each?

Well, speaking of just the 25DEC Getty pic only (which btw is 1 of 4 consecutive pics at sunset) I can only say that the Christmas village lights not being lit or populated, as that other open sauce pic (with the flag at half mast) shows the stalls lit and with people about, and it being sunset (not middle of the night) seems to confirm it is Christmas Day. No people and no lights at a time when the Christmas Village on the South Bank should be bustling.

As for the other, if anon has already looked at the meta data on the pic and can’t find moar, then this anon surely doesn’t have abilities beyond yours.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

b52457  No.16769361

>>16719993

>Four on 10-AUG-2013-T

The one to the left of the Crowne Plaza is there, but lights not visible, I had to enlarge the image to see it standing there

https://www.alamy.com/stock-photo-london-england-uk-10th-august-2013-view-from-the-golden-jubilee-bridge-59174399.html?

Again, watch the water. Observe the chop? Likely not a time lapse pic when you can see it in detail like that. So just my theory, it could be the pic captured the crane with its light in the ‘off’ phase flashing.

Nao all we need is a nice long vid showing crane lights with a slow flashing. I seem to recall a long vid out there of a barge going up river. Unfortunately, when we view many of the vids we do, we are looking for something entirely different. Ugh. I dread tryna scare up that vid.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

2b0e5f  No.16769475

>>16768602

More info on building anti-collision lights.

https://www.wetraobstructionlight.com/tall-buildings/

https://www.wetraobstructionlight.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/ICAO-Annex-14.pdf

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

3da09c  No.16770543

Updated Building Scrutiny Bun

>>16695651, >>16695655, >>16696348, >>16696361, >>16696367, >>16696371, >>16696377 The DUMONT

>>16695851, >>16696278, >>16696407, >>16720242 Camelford House, 87-90 Albert Embankment

>>16696244, >>16696248 Park Plaza London Riverbank Hotel 18 Albert Embankment, London SE1 7TJ, 1-AUG-2012-P vid of the two bridges over Thames, camera vantage The Eye (video)

>>16696414, >>16696415 Vauxhall SV images for 2012, 2013, 2019. Reference

>>16696455 Peninsula Heights Apartments, 93 Albert Embankment. The cranes in 22-DEC-2013-T are lit up on top

>>16696534 GE-07-2013-T (3D buildings overlayed)

>>16696573 Additional candidates for pink/ purple lit building?

>>16696609 Should not lose sight of the fact that most of the candidates for the pink/purple coloured building also reinforce the pre-2015-2016 conclusion UK Anons are working with for dating the Q pics

>>16696831, >>16696840 New Years Eve 31-DEC-2013-T videos for elevated night time views of the Embankments

>>16696954 NYE 31-DEC-2013-T via BBC One

>>16697024, >>16697063 Stock photos, various years

>>16704118, >>16704257, >>16720353 Riverbank Plaza Hotel, 18 Albert Embankment London SE1 7SP with obvious exterior lighting

>>16704262 2011, Crowne Plaza and Riverbank Plaza hotels

>>16747440, >>16747575 24London open sauce photo (nicknamed "Purple Sister" re LisaMI6) vid mark 1 minute https://youtu.be/eDzV7cMRvHM?t=63 Purple building lit, two crans at Vauxhall, shroud at Westminster tower

>>16747587 Moar points of interest in comparison between open sauce pics and LisaMI6

>>16747671 Pic taken from Millbank Tower: Note that the gap in the row of waterfront buldings had not yet appeared at the time of this pic. Also the Crowne Plaza had not yet undergone rennovations. And 18 Albert Embankment, the building with the 3-sided waterfront, had not been rennovated

>>16747726, >>16747742, >>16747754, >>16747766 Various SV images along the Millbank (A3212) provide a view of the other side of the river which is obstructed by treecover

>>16747778, >>16747901 Good view of the area of interest on Albert embankment, pre-demolition

>>16748013, >>16748035, >>16748204, >>16748313 Getty stock photo, 25-DEC-2013-T. Close match with LisaMI6 and with 24London

>>16753143, >>16753358, >>16753413, 16753504, >>16764764, >>16766154 Comparison pics, future site of Corniche building Google Earth GE-MAR-2012 Imagery Date: 8/2/2011 & GE-JUL-2013 Imagery Date: 18-JUL-2013 View Location: 51°29'27.88" N 0°07'18.01" W

>>16747817, >>16753504, >>16755363 Comparison: Google Earth JUL-2013 Streetview AUG-2013, checking for hoarding installations

>>16753687, >>16753747, >>16753808 SV-JUL-2014 The Corniche gap

>>16754392, >>16754461, >>16754678, >>1654723, >>1654735, >>16765628, >>16767324 18 Albert Embankment (Park Plaza London Riverbank Hotel) glass facade and coloured floodlighting

>>16755875 Crowne Plaza hotel to open on Albert Embankment, 27 September 2013 https://www.london-se1.co.uk/news/view/7106

>>16755895, 16755898, >>16755927, >>16755937, >>16755950 Albert Embankment: rooftop club overlooking Parliament approved 7 August 2016

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

3da09c  No.16770545

Updated Counting Cranes Bun

>>16704118, >>16704289 Signs of cranes in open sauces in places that would have been within the camera frames of each of the EMB pics

>>16704327 At least six cranes around Dec 2013

>>16704415, >>16704460 22-DEC-2013-T Daytime pic over looking TATTERSHALL CASTLE, 4 to 5 cranes visible over Vauxhall

>>16705019, >>16705021 At least three [3] cranes lit in night pic of 28-SEP-2013-T

>>16719993, >>16742328 Four cranes 10-AUG-2013-T The one to the left of the Crowne Plaza is there, but lights not visible, had to enlarge the image to see it

>>16742364, >>16742373 Cap of N. Chadwick pic of Thames skyline 28-SEP-2013-T Three cranes at Vauxhall, No pink/purple lit building, apparently

>>16747634 Closeup of the Albert Embankment as cap;tured by Chadwick 22-DEC-2013, daytime, at least four cranes at Vauxhall

>>16748734, >>16748997, >>16767403 TinEye says first found 6 December 2014. Notice the cranes on left. The nearest St. George Tower has big white floodlight, the one left has white flood and a red for the two boom sections

>>16749161, >>16767266, >>16767292 ROT1 Match: Mike Kemp, Date created: 14 December, 2013: UK - London - South Bank View during the busy Christmas season towards the London Eye and Westminster. Cranes behind London Eye

>>16749877, >>16753025 Shutterstock 134752082: TineEye says first found 31 August, 2013 St George Tower not complete, but lower floors have the lights on No demolition for Corniche or Dumont

>>16753525, >>16753556 Four cranes, GE-AUG-2013 and SV-AUG-2013

>>16765628 Four cranes 10-AUG-2013-T The one to the left of the Crowne Plaza is there, but lights not visible, had to enlarge the image to see it

>>16766354, >>16767268, >>16769475 January 2013, helicopter collides with crane at St George Tower. Civil Aviation Authority confirmed red aviation warning lights on tall structures only need to be turned on at night - and not during bad weather in daylight hours - because they are not visible in fog or low cloud

>>16754266 Chadwick, 22-DEC-2013-T Up river to Westminster Bridge https://www.geograph.org.uk/photo/3816144 And a closelup modified to enhance view of the cranes and buiding profiles

>>16767324, >>16767344, >>16767348, >>16767357, >>16767381, >>1676403, NSA_Traf_CAM_LONDON2847 and NSA_Traf_CAM_ROT1 - 1423 cranes

>>16767429 Shutterstock, TinEye says first found 28 April, 2014 https://www.shutterstock.com/image-photo/view-vauxhall-bridge-center-london-night-189181721? Two cranes to far right, looks like hoarding on those buildings demolished for the Corniche

>>16767481 #6 in the set, Tineye first found 24 Dec, 2015. Four, maybe five cranes behind the Millbank Tower. One crane with horizntal boom visible in Vauxhall to left of St George Tower

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

3da09c  No.16770552

Updated Corinthia Hotel & Yellow Bike Bun

>>16704568 Image with two details that distinguish the scene from the Q-pics re CH

>>16704672 08-DEC-2012-T Corinthia Hotel and Blue Boris Bikes

>>16704822 Pics of the Yellow bike taken by same photographer on 22-DEC-2013. Both show one wheel IN FRONT of a post, Q pics show the wheel BEHIND that same post - with the exception of CH3

>>16704936 SV-May-2012 showing the pedestrian island

>>16705073, >>16720953 Yellow Bike SV images parked with one wheel in front of the post, SV-MAY-2014-P

>>16734442, >>16734449 1-MAR-2014-T Corinthia Hotel, blue Boris Bikes, Spamalot at the Playhouse Theatre, and that little green with white cross First Aid sign or whatever it is on the pole

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

3da09c  No.16770559

Other References Bun

>>16730686, >>16730914, >>16731429 Tide tables at London Bridge for 2013

>>16732209, >>16732538, >>16733324, >>16734100 Reference pic to show the distance from Hungerford Bridge to TATTERSHALL CASTLE 25-OCT-2014-T

>>16734821 24-OCT-2015-T Post-Refit TATTERSHALL CASTLE, RAF Memorial is dark

>>16747168 8-NOV-2016-T Link to 21 second vid showing darkened RAF Memorial https://www.bitchute.com/video/NgOsVFAEw9Pd/

>>16747275 OCT-2011, Reference, view from footbridge similair to Q pics, especially LisaMi6. VID: https://www.bitchute.com/video/mt7jBASQ5LvO/

>>16747303 Vid, comparison, LisaMI6 with two open sauces. VID: https://www.bitchute.com/video/bzft57cyoYTI/

>>16754564 Picadilly Circus Snowglobe: Chadwick, 22-DEC-2013 https://www.geograph.org.uk/photo/3786715

>>16756137 December 2013, the Weather closes in

>>16756217 View from the Pentagon, NIOC

>>16754281, >>16754319, >>16767276 NSA_Traf_CAM_LONDON2847 and NSA_Traf_CAM_ROT1 - 1423 with modified versions to bring out the treecover which obscures the view of Albert Embankment

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

3da09c  No.16770571

Notables are NOT Endorsements

passing 320

#47

>>16720935, >>16721106 Anons notices the constellations visible despite city lights in 2018 Alamy stock pic

>>16724486 Building Scrutiny Bun

>>16724487 Counting Cranes Bun

>>16724490 Corinthia Hotel & Yellow Bike Bun

>>16730686, >>16730914, >>16731429 Tide tables at London Bridge for 2013

>>16732365 Man acquitted re Air India bombing has been shot in Canada

>>16732851 From General Research: World Health Organization Officially States That There Are More Than Two Biological Genders

>>16749548 Request for Anons: Please show the following video (Winter Wonderland) to a normie. The purpose is to test this video for ease of comprehension

>>16770543 Updated Building Scrutiny Bun

>>16770545 Updated Counting Cranes Bun

>>16770552 Updated Corinthia Hotel & Yellow Bike Bun

>>16770559 Other References Bun

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

4a489b  No.16770726

Rumble embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Hey UK anons,

Devin Nunes announced on podcast last night Truth Social is open in the UK, tell all your friends and family. July 19, 2022

Then the go on to Podcast title

SPECIAL EDITION: Exposing the Jan. 6 Witch Hunt

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

4a489b  No.16770746

>>16770726

Heres the Rumble link since the thumbnail didnt show to Devin Nunes Truth Social open in UK

https://rumble.com/embed/v1a9113/?pub=4

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

fa237c  No.16772090

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

>>16754266 >>16753556 >>16753504

>>16754281 >>16754319 >>16748734

>>16747587 >>16747575 >>16747275

>>16742328 10-AUG-2013

>>16730811 22-DEC-2013

Vid comparison, AUG v DEC 2013.

https://youtu.be/u0X4d9PMuoU

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

fa237c  No.16772111

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

>>16772090

Suggest that the vid be run in repeat mode to take advantage of the fades continuously rotating.

Here is text from description under the vid.

Jul 20, 2022 Two moments in time as view from the Golden Jubilee Bridge over the River Thames, London, UK. A night view of the Albert Embankment captured 10-AUG-2013 compared with a day view captured 22-DEC-2013.

This area of the riverside underwent re-development beginning in 2013. Cranes appeared on the skyline. A few buildings were demolished and this left a gap in the riverside buildings along the Albert Embankment. This gap can just be made out in the 22-DEC-2013 photograph.

Red safety lights on the cranes appeared in the night view of this scene. The booms of the cranes were discernible during daylight.

Note the erection of a new tower, also, with its crane's appearance. More redevelopment activity took place in subsequent years.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

fa237c  No.16772210

>>16769475

TY Anon.

>>16769231

Yes, the Getty 25-DEC-2013 pic has both content and metadata that indicates Christmas Day prior to sunset, as you deduced.

The halfmasted flag is interdasting because, so far, have not found flag treatment of that kind on sites closer to Westminister Palace where it would be expected if a significant British death had been acknowledged. Also interdasting because of the repeated use of full flown flags in several other Q drops. Might be something, might be nothing.

>>16768747

The flashing light solution to the apparent contradiction of 22-DEC-2013 would have to rely on muiltiple red lights on multiple cranes being in sync and off at the same moment. Now, that might account for 1 red light, I think, but what are the odds of all the red lights being off at the moments (multiple pics) that scene had been captured? Plausibe and possible, I supposed, but highly unlikely, I would speculate.

Of course, such a factor could have combined with the treecover to obscure the red lights on cranes that had been energized re safety requirements.

The 10-AUG-2013 pic is not Q match in terms of the brightly lit pink/ purple building. So there clearly were variables in play regarding these bits of pictorial evidence. Note that 18 Albert Embankment was not being redeveloped during the AUG-DEC-2013 interval. Its neighbours were - the Crown Plaza on one side and Hampton House and the other buildings that would be demolished on the other side. So at that time the crane that would have appeared later during the addition of floors ontop of 18 Albert Embankment would not have been in its place yet. But the crane behind Hampton House and the two cranes farther in the distance were in place at that time.

Need some evidence of these cranes being present, and sporting the red lights, subsequent to 22-DEC-2013 so as to confirm that such where present, but unseen, in the Q pics. But, if we find evidence they were not in the skyline, for whatever reason, during an interval after 22-DEC-2013, then, we'd have reconciled the apparent discrepancy.

>>16768134

You are quite right to point out that spot in the Q pic, fren. Tantalizing, isn't it? That could be red light. Please map it to a spot on other pics for comparison. We know the crane booms were NOT stationery, but can we place that spot in the Q pic to a relative spot in open source pics? That is, would that spot be within range of one of the 4 cranes that we've counted in the 22-DEC-2013 pic? There may be proxies that help with that, IDK.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

fa237c  No.16772271

File: 41010b1ad195fab⋯.png (458.74 KB, 915x527, 915:527, ClipboardImage.png)

File: 62826fa706d94bf⋯.png (1.02 MB, 1360x680, 2:1, ClipboardImage.png)

>>16767481

For clarity for new eyes, St Geroge Tower is the tower in the background left of frame. Its full name is St George Wharf Tower. Address: 1 St George Wharf, London SW8 2DU, UK.

The area around it also was redeveloped starting around the time of the Q pics and very intensively during several years afterward.

https://www.google.com/maps/@51.4881553,-0.1281466,3a,56.9y,175.48h,100.45t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1sqHza8CpXKRXEotbxR1St2w!2e0!5s20140701T000000!7i13312!8i6656

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

fa237c  No.16772293

>>16772271

>>16772271

Sorry if my text was confusing. St George Wharf Tower appeared in background left of frame in the pic posted earlier >>16767481

https://www.mrsmithworldphotography.com/colour-photographs-of-london-landmarks/millbank-tower

It appeared right of frame in the pics I just posted >>16772271 .

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

fa237c  No.16772437

New Year Day parade, 01-JAN-2014-T

https://youtu.be/8UF4_CNrpTU

Same day, Piccadilly Circus.

https://youtu.be/x9miY2kAE3s

Nother, American cheerleaders participated.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n5BAdPjDBvU

American marching bands too.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e7rQ01r16MQ

Nother, showed different camera positions

https://youtu.be/HVbNADlZ7e8

Piccadilly again

https://youtu.be/TV4qFK0xJkg

Very good picture of the weather conditions.

https://youtu.be/GueEXUWCuL4

Roads closed from Piccadilly Circus to Parliament Square. AND WEATHER REPORT at mark 2:40

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PPvhkVlF-ZM

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

fa237c  No.16772512

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Christmas LONDON weather, 2013

https://youtu.be/wrGZQw5O49c

Forecast Christmas Eve to 27-DEC-2013

https://youtu.be/ViCDomVKanw

Christmas in London 22-DEC-2013-P

https://youtu.be/3urMq6clInc

Christmas Week events/weather, 20-DEC-2013-P

20-DEC-2013

https://youtu.be/arz_OY56b_k

21-22-DEC-2013

https://youtu.be/oHdLGZX4Ey0

Tidal surge DEC 2013

https://youtu.be/NA9F89Q2ons

DEC 2013 Weather reviewed

https://youtu.be/RDR8CbuOU5E

https://youtu.be/gD8nq5IgosU

https://youtu.be/8NUL8hJzESo

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

3da09c  No.16772531

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

I don't know what to make of this one:

Southbank Christmas Markets London Christmas Gift Shopping

"Roberts London" 14-DEC-2013-P (Cannot verify if taken on , no headphones here so can't hear a word he says)

Run Time 8:22

At the 8 minute mark he looks down the Thames and we see the St George lit and then one red crane light.

He fast forwards the video a great deal so I can't tell you anything about the Christmas shops, if there's a glimpse of TATTERSHALL CASTLE, or much else

I did see the Eye lit in blue, the hoarding over Westminster, and that flag seen half mast position before, but this shot shows all the way up the pole

Video at:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BRA9SCOi3y0

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

3da09c  No.16772538

File: ca1b586e46f96a9⋯.png (779.62 KB, 1920x947, 1920:947, Screenshot_2022_07_21_at_0….png)

>>16772531 (me)

This one better

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

fa237c  No.16772598

Christmas LONDON weather, 2013

https://youtu.be/wrGZQw5O49c

Forecast Christmas Eve to 27-DEC-2013

https://youtu.be/ViCDomVKanw

Christmas in London 22-DEC-2013-P

https://youtu.be/3urMq6clInc

Christmas Week events/weather, 20-DEC-2013-P

20-DEC-2013

https://youtu.be/arz_OY56b_k

21-22-DEC-2013

https://youtu.be/oHdLGZX4Ey0

Tidal surge DEC 2013

https://youtu.be/NA9F89Q2ons

DEC 2013 Weather reviewed

https://youtu.be/RDR8CbuOU5E

https://youtu.be/gD8nq5IgosU

https://youtu.be/8NUL8hJzESo>>16772531

>flag seen half mast position before, but this shot shows all the way up the pole

Gud eye, fren.

Southbank Centre Winter Festival operational days, as far as I have figured:

01-DEC-2013

24-DEC-2013

But I think the open air market operated longer.

16-NOV-2013

10-JAN-2014

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

3da09c  No.16772611

Christmas in London 2013

6-DEC-2013-P (or T, can't hear the audio on my end)

Run time 17:34

Piccadilly Snow Globe at 2:10

White capped funnel on TATTERSHALL CASTLE at 3:52, then swings to show RAF Memorial lit, hoarding at Westminster, purple building

Victoria Embankment at 14:15, hoarding on Westminster, two very bright white lights high and to the left (plane?) then pans left, Millbank Lights, two cranes over Vauxhall, all the way back to a blue London Eye

Many times the video is rather blurred and there is an annoying pop-up wanting a log-in via google or such

video at:

https://ok.ru/video/3634365838

video would not embed for me

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

fa237c  No.16772641

File: 398488e21b93203⋯.png (275.93 KB, 1360x768, 85:48, ClipboardImage.png)

File: ea001bc9fa7cb3f⋯.png (99.26 KB, 1028x423, 1028:423, ClipboardImage.png)

File: ea001bc9fa7cb3f⋯.png (99.26 KB, 1028x423, 1028:423, ClipboardImage.png)

>>16772611

>https://ok.ru/video/3634365838

Caps from about the 4 minute mark.

No red lights on cranes in target area.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

fa237c  No.16772733

>>16772641

>>16772611

Noice find, fren. Very noice.

This vid captured the Albert Embankment skyline more than once. As per the cap in prev post >>16772641 the red lights were not recorded; but later they were. Interdasting.

Also, what struck me immediately was the amount and thickness of green treecover in this vid. It did not seem to match the Q pics very well on that point. Could it be that heavy winds between this recording and Q pics blew enough leaves off to make a noticeable difference in the view of the skyline?

The camera in this vid moved farther toward the centre of the footbridge so it did not line up well with the LisaMI6 position. Still it is close enough to make useful comparisons.

Millbank Tower lights do not match, which may add more weight to notion that the pattern in Q pics is a good marker for a distinctive time interval, ie Christmas Eve/ Day to boxing day.

The Speaker's apartments were unlit in this vid which matches LisaMI6. But not so re the RAF Memorial lighting.

The TATT's lighting seemed a good Q match.

The pink/ purple building in this vid was recorded very clearly. It matches the vid we already have that showed camera drive right up to that building on Albert Embankment at night. The shot in this vid, however, is good to compare with LisaMI6 on this score; the bright building is only just out of camera frame of the Q pic. Just at the edge. Also, this vid captured the time on Big Ben's clockface, unlike Lisa.

AND importantly for our dig on the cranes and the red lights; this vid recording no flalshing red lights over the target area; steady red lights. From what I can tell, only 2 red lights = 2 cranes in the night skyline in early DEC-2013.

There was a pulsing red light on building behind The Eye but that pulsing effect may have been due to auto adjustments on the camera. That position does not appear to be on a crane but rather on the building. Will need to compare more carefully with proxies and with Q pics..

And at that point in this vid, the red lights over the target area near the pink/ purple building also seemed to be gone. This could be due the camera adjusting itself. When those lights were visible, no flashing.

Did not spot the prominent Flag on that side of the river. That might indicate this was routinely lowered at night?

The night sky showed overcast so could not make out stars above.

The tide seemed on the high side re TATT gangway and HISP height to shore.

Observs, Anons?

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

3da09c  No.16772807

>>16772641

I can one through the spokes of the Eye, two more over Vauxhall, The video is rather poor quality throughout

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

3da09c  No.16772810

>>16772733

<pulsing red light on building behind The Eye but that pulsing effect may have been due to auto adjustments on the camera. That position does not appear to be on a crane but rather on the building

The had me hung up for a minute as well. Not sure if pulsing light on the building, the railway, or just something like a tree branch in the way as he moves

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

3da09c  No.16772824

>>16772733

>Could it be that heavy winds between this recording and Q pics blew enough leaves off to make a noticeable difference in the view of the skyline?

Forgot to ask:

The heavy winds on 23 December that closed Winter Wonderland and dig bad things to the Piccadilly Snow globe? Many breads ago it was posted what kind of trees those are along the Embankment, how tough are they?

I did not catch the time on the clock tower, good thing there's a lot of anons can go over these vids to spot details others missed

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

fa237c  No.16773003

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

>>16772611

Here's short vid of snippets from the original and much longer version.

Original

https://ok.ru/video/3634365838

Shorter viersion 06-DEC-2013-P.

https://youtu.be/3ESHoO1cpl8

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

b84aa9  No.16774018

>>16770726

Thanks anon.

Just filtered out the noise and saw your post.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

fa237c  No.16776457

Based on the pictorial evidence, there were cranes on the Albert Embankment skyline between AUG-2013 and 22-DEC-2013. The work for which these cranes were present did continue for years afterward as per the gap in the riverside buildings in that area; as per the erection of new buildings within that gap; as per the various images from open sources, including GE and SV for several years. The narrowed interval of Christmas week has not been contradicted.

The pictorial evidence includes a video recording in early DEC-2013 which was shot at night and captured red lights in the locations of the cranes in the area of interest near 18 Albert Embankment which has been identified as the pink/ purple building in the Q pics of the Victoria Embankment. The still photos better captured these red lights than did the video recordings which at times showed the lights present, when the images were very sharply focussed on the distance, and not present, when the images were more blurred. These recordings, or clips as per the shorter version recently posted, were taken on the same night.

The Q pics did not capture the distant skyline of the Albert Embankment in a focussed way; that part of the Q pics was quite blurred and partially obscured behind treecover. Interdastingly, the comparisons between the early weeks of the Christmas Timeframe and the Q pics suggests that the treecover was lighter, that the branches were burdened with less foilage ion the Q pics than in early DEC-2013 images, for example. This may be explained by the heavy winds and stormy weather recorded prior to Christmas week 2013.

The tidal and lunar evidence also points to the week of Christmas as the likely time interval for these Embankment pics. The 06-DEC-2013-P video shows a high tide in the darkness and can be favourably compared with the tidal indications in the Q pics, also. Was this recording made in late NOV-2013? That may be plausible.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

3da09c  No.16776596

>>16773003

Yep, there are the cranes.

Best at the zooming of the still pic starting at the 2 minute mark. Faint, but there is a red light of a crane over the lit-up Riverbank Plaza Hotel and another one to the left just peeking out above the top right hand corner of that other building.

I seent it!

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

3da09c  No.16776956

File: 1d67631e63db258⋯.png (29.68 KB, 515x171, 515:171, 1d67631e63db258757d99697c7….png)

File: 5888c3046eae957⋯.png (78.76 KB, 865x636, 865:636, 5888c3046eae9571646c768426….png)

File: 152c0e562977028⋯.png (236.37 KB, 858x529, 858:529, 152c0e562977028ded88b8b215….png)

Anons knew

General Research #21162 >>16776759

AP Highlights 'Ukraine's History Of Rampant Corruption' After US Lawmaker Slams Zelensky

Days after Politico reported that Republicans are freaking out because one of their own, Rep. Victoria Spartz, slammed the government of Ukraine and called for "proper oversight of critical infrastructure and delivery of weapons and aid," the Associated Press (aggregated by NPR, no less) has joined this very out-of-character departure from prevailing narratives peddled by mainstream outlets.

In short - it seems that MSM outlets agree that perhaps it's unwise to send unchecked billions in weapons and aid to a notoriously corrupt nation whose president, Volodomyr Zelensky, just fired their equivalent of their CIA director and Attorney General while accusing them of treason.

https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/ap-highlights-ukraines-history-rampant-corruption-after-us-lawmaker-slams-zelensky

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

3da09c  No.16777347

Russia, Russia, Russia lost traction, must try to maintain ghost of credibility? ...Anons KNOW

General Research #21163 >>16777316

21 Jul, 2022 22:54

British spy chief reveals top priority

The UK intelligence puts “more effort into China” than any other field of their work, head of MI6 Richard Moore has said

British intelligence is now focusing its efforts on China, Richard Moore, the head of the Secret Intelligence Service (SIS), also known as MI6, said on Thursday. Understanding the way Beijing pursues its strategic goals is now one of the most complex challenges British intelligence is facing, he told the Aspen Security Forum in Colorado, US.

“We are putting more effort into China. We now devote more effort to China than any other single subject,” Moore told the forum, adding that there is “a growing recognition” in London of the “threats” China supposedly poses. According to MI6, understanding China is now a more pressing task for the intelligence than fighting terrorism.

MI6 “never had any illusions whatsoever about Communist China,” he said, but admitted that, for British intelligence, the Chinese systems appear to still be “pretty opaque.” His agency has little problem understanding Chinese President Xi Jinping's “strategic intent,” but “if yougo beneath that strategy, in terms of how they implement, how they organize… that’s a black box,” the MI6 chief said.

The role of his organization is to help “British ministers and policymakers to understand that so they can navigate this really complex, difficult relationship with the Chinese.”

Moore also added that Beijing is supposedly closely following the developments in Ukraine and argued that the West should continue to support Kiev so that it could “negotiate from a position of significant strength.” Otherwise, Beijing could see it as Western “weakness” and possibly attack Taiwan, Moore claimed.

His words came amid the ongoing tension between Beijing and Washington over Taiwan. Beijing considers the island that has been self-governed since the end of the Chinese civil war in 1949 to be part of its own territory under the One China policy.

The US, which says it is committed to the One China policy, maintains strong unofficial ties with Taipei, selling weapons to the island and tacitly encouraging its push for sovereignty. China has repeatedly slammed this behavior as a provocation and interference into its internal affairs.

More recently, Beijing issued a warning to Washington in the wake of a report by the Financial Times about House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s alleged plans to take a congressional delegation to Taiwan next month. If the visit does take place, it would have far-reaching consequences for bilateral relations between the two nations, China warned.

https://www.rt.com/news/559425-british-spy-chief-top-priority/

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

a29957  No.16780506

File: 2d2699d0d1b0172⋯.jpeg (104.87 KB, 640x873, 640:873, 925CDB63_E7F6_44A7_8D7F_D….jpeg)

File: c4fcdc82bbd6b9f⋯.jpeg (136.97 KB, 639x967, 639:967, 084573AA_7BBD_4EA8_9E04_2….jpeg)

>>16772824

>>>16772824

>Many breads ago it was posted what kind of trees those are along the Embankment, how tough are they?

The trees along the Embankment are the ubiquitous LONDON PLANE TREE, a Sycamore.

Found an awsome map of allthe trees in London. See cap

https://apps.london.gov.uk/street-trees/

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

a29957  No.16780964

>>16772807

>>16749161

Well we may be able to firm up the not before bookend for ROT1 with TWO red cranes lights behind LONDON EYE as also seen in the open sauce pic on 14DEC. The vid circa 6DEC only has ONE red crane light behind LONDON EYE, so the 2nd was added sometime between 6 and 14DEC. Just 8 days.

Did we get a location on one or both of those cranes behind the Eye?

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

2b0e5f  No.16780983

>>16780506

>>16772824

The London Plane tree is pretty damn tough and can handle city pollution better than most other trees, and is resistant to disease.

It will handle most soil types and can cope with occasional floods and droughts.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

fa237c  No.16780993

File: 58744dba69239b8⋯.png (76.67 KB, 222x241, 222:241, ClipboardImage.png)

File: 0a973fcf8268bd8⋯.png (738.4 KB, 757x489, 757:489, ClipboardImage.png)

File: 4443a079c7173ac⋯.png (948.63 KB, 775x593, 775:593, ClipboardImage.png)

File: b1363763bc6d2c1⋯.png (6.9 KB, 230x78, 115:39, ClipboardImage.png)

>>16780506

https://www.london.gov.uk/sites/default/files/valuing_londons_urban_forest_i-tree_report_final.pdf

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

a29957  No.16781106

>>16780964

Sorry, just realized the original vid with just one crane behind the EYE was taken in late November.

But our first sauce for two cranes behind the EYE is still 14DEC to match the Q pic ROT1?

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

fa237c  No.16781139

File: 92b9a776716b469⋯.png (403.55 KB, 687x479, 687:479, ClipboardImage.png)

File: e8b99b2a0689788⋯.png (420.51 KB, 689x339, 689:339, ClipboardImage.png)

File: 5a2b0293c501b4a⋯.png (489.44 KB, 613x411, 613:411, ClipboardImage.png)

File: dca3c8a555a9586⋯.png (381.58 KB, 741x646, 39:34, ClipboardImage.png)

Examples of tree coverage

https://www.westminsterconservatives.com/news/leaf-clearing

Autumn is here with the start of Westminster City Council's leaf clearing plan.

In Eccleston Square, Pimlico, work has been underway clearing up fallen leaves to ensure that our pavements are safe for pedestrians. It's a problem each year that the Council is well accustomed to dealing with.

Cllr Jacqui Wilkinson explains: "This vital work will continue throughout Westminster for the next four to six weeks during which time about 1,000 tonnes of leaves from our streets will be collected in addition to the usual levels of litter."

Mid-November

4-6 weeks

Mid-January

21-DEC-2009-T

https://www.alamy.com/stock-photo-night-london-at-victoria-embankment-51794422.html?imageid=C92D486E-5507-4B18-9A0C-2A122D71D9FD&p=167104&pn=1&searchId=83d2dc530d9240622c1cdaac0e6637a0&searchtype=0

https://www.alamy.com/stock-photo/D07C8P.html?imgt=0

https://www.alamy.com/stock-photo-victoria-embankment-london-england-united-kingdom-uk-136825961.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

fa237c  No.16781253

File: d26a7abf246249f⋯.png (235.61 KB, 745x648, 745:648, ClipboardImage.png)

>>16781139

Victoria Embankment, New Years Eve crowds with Big Ben, evening, DEC-2013

https://www.alamy.com/stock-photo-england-london-victoria-embankment-new-years-eve-crowds-with-big-ben-149618625.html

https://www.alamy.com/stock-photo/JKBM29.html?imgt=0

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

fa237c  No.16781263

File: ee5d55db1f1d364⋯.png (677.74 KB, 618x646, 309:323, ClipboardImage.png)

>>16781253

New Year's Eve, 2013 - T

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

fa237c  No.16781287

File: f7fc51bc38de544⋯.png (506.69 KB, 443x645, 443:645, ClipboardImage.png)

File: 1b28881f6b95d72⋯.png (644.3 KB, 1130x645, 226:129, ClipboardImage.png)

File: b3cf281b57b2e2b⋯.png (725.04 KB, 1130x645, 226:129, ClipboardImage.png)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

fa237c  No.16781300

>>16754319

Using NYEE-2013 stock photo as a proxy, the leaf coverage on the tree canopy over Victoria Embankment is a fairly good Q-match with LONDON2847 and ROT-1. So another means of confirming the time interval of Christmas week-NYE, post wind storm.

>>16754281

>>16781287

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

fa237c  No.16781344

File: 09febb8115c0c88⋯.png (897.07 KB, 1360x768, 85:48, ClipboardImage.png)

>>16781300

Previous year, JAN-2013

https://youtu.be/wr5htJ5ebsE?t=206

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

fa237c  No.16781355

File: 7a3cce16426c9d2⋯.png (493.53 KB, 1040x451, 1040:451, ClipboardImage.png)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

fa237c  No.16781408

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

>>16780964 >>16781106

14-DEC-2013

2 Red lights/ 2 cranes behind The Eye.

ROT_1 does show two red lights, however, these might be on the ferris wheel. But those Q red lights are very near where there is a red light in video of 14-DEC-2013-P

See >>16773003

https://youtu.be/3ESHoO1cpl8

In the vid the red light seemed to pulse but this may be apparent rather than real; the camera's positioned changed and the wheel may also have rotated. But can't rule out that this red light flashed momentarily rather than continuously. Also not clear that it was on a crane, but maybe.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

fa237c  No.16781455

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

>>16781408

Interdasting vid re the re-development of Albert Embankment discussed.

https://youtu.be/Wgr-Pv-0Rt8?t=316

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

a29957  No.16781649

>>16781408

>ROT_1 does show two red lights, however, these might be on the ferris wheel.

No. Sorry, but your vids you posted showed that red light both inside and outside the wheel of London Eye and in the same location (too much coincidence) as the two red lights seen in ROT1. You are forgetting your own sauce on 14DEC with 2 easily identifiable cranes in the same area as in the vid and in ROT1. That’s ridiculous for you to now say they could be on the London Eye. Never but never has any pic of LE shown any red lights on the pods. Ffs. Jesus.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

00613e  No.16783231

>>16783226

wait. how do u delete?

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

058f2b  No.16783312

File: 4e74b13d77b2ab3⋯.jpg (109.46 KB, 357x500, 357:500, Prince_Andrew_Mound.jpg)

Good morning UK.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

3da09c  No.16784670

File: 0d64b9ce4e7e271⋯.jpg (120.55 KB, 900x598, 450:299, london_south_bank_skyline_….jpg)

File: ac056ce530d8ff2⋯.png (662.37 KB, 1920x947, 1920:947, Screenshot_2022_07_22_at_2….png)

File: aefd3b9c4009d4f⋯.png (2.16 MB, 1920x968, 240:121, Screenshot_2022_07_22_at_2….png)

>>16780964

>Did we get a location on one or both of those cranes behind the Eye?

January 31, 2013 Matthew Gibs

Building behind the Eye is Southbank Place

His pic shows crane next to St Goerge, a tall white one behind Southbank Place, and another one at the extreme left of the pic that to me looks like the boom is not yet complete. It's too tall for a mobile yet not quite as tall as the white one

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

3da09c  No.16784726

File: 7aa2da1fff30f38⋯.png (2.46 MB, 1920x947, 1920:947, Screenshot_2022_07_22_at_2….png)

File: ac16456340778bb⋯.png (1.31 MB, 1920x947, 1920:947, Screenshot_2022_07_22_at_2….png)

I can't be sure yet but the two cranes seen behind the Eye may be engaged in demolition of those buildings behind Southbank Place.

Daytime shot shows White-topped funnel of TATTERSHALL CASTLE in the foreground and older buildings

Night shot 2017 (lost the original sauce) shows all the new stuff

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

3da09c  No.16784803

>>16784670 (me)

And to make things more interesting:

Our favorite little tower at Westminster is not surrounded by hoarding.

Millbank Tower has a great many lights on.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

3da09c  No.16785910

>>16747440

Looking at this image again, notice the two cranes behind the London Eye.

The building with the blue lights I don't have a name for yet, but that tells me the cranes we seek are further back then County Hall

Here we go again! Images when looking for one thing also capture something else of interest

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

3da09c  No.16786350

File: 1ea9e2f140c9648⋯.jpg (222.9 KB, 1920x1080, 16:9, me9099263_romantic_south_b….jpg)

I think I have it figured out on the where

ROT1 shows two cranes behind London Eye >>16767295

Best view Mike Kemp 14-DEC-2013-T >>16749161

Look closer at the Kemp pic. The cranes appear to be finsihing the work on the Park Plaza Westminster Hotel. The other blue lighting to the side is the Park Plaza County Hall Hotel

I'll say Park Plaza Westminster, and its rounded shape, is the second of the two completed.

Now it's a matter of finding when construction completed and the cranes came down.

What if the bright light near the hub of the Eye is NOT the moon, but a crane floodlight, The red light at the end of the boom obscured but the Eye structure? Check out the crane floodlighting the building on the right side of the pic

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

3da09c  No.16786435

>>16786350 (me)

Scratch the hotels, completed by 2010

No idea if those cranes are installing rooftop air conditioning or what but the buildings had been finished before our targeted time frame

Park Plaza County Hall: Construction started 2005, completed 2007

https://www.emporis.com/buildings/159539/park-plaza-county-hall-london-united-kingdom

Park Plaza Westminster: Construction started 2007, completed 2010

https://www.emporis.com/buildings/159540/park-plaza-westminster-bridge-london-united-kingdom

I'm going to wonder off for a bit a sob quietly in a corner

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

938b77  No.16786877

File: 562dfe02145af17⋯.jpeg (859.15 KB, 640x888, 80:111, BA20C5E4_1785_43EE_9D0F_3….jpeg)

>>16786435

You are on target. It looked the same to me. Mebbe the cranes are behind the Park Plaza at URBANEST? Or near King’s Cross Theatre?

Right nao, we have a timeline of:

1 crane around 23NOV2013 and

2 cranes around 14DEC2014.

Not bad bookends. Just 21 days!

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

938b77  No.16786891

File: 5605d70000442ae⋯.jpeg (719.5 KB, 640x1049, 640:1049, 75F75F8B_005E_4B80_9119_7….jpeg)

>>16786435

>I'm going to wonder off for a bit a sob quietly in a corner

You’re doing a great job. Let’s look at those blue lights. They seem like they are roof lights lining the roof lines of two separate roofs with different shapes. Perhaps two sister buildings with the same lighting scheme? If we run a line from the center of the South Bank carousel…

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

938b77  No.16786927

File: e3675727c9df2d2⋯.jpeg (896.03 KB, 632x949, 632:949, 587D7BF1_2B4E_4FE2_9650_9….jpeg)

File: 00400b02fad1db6⋯.png (849.61 KB, 1334x750, 667:375, 65EBC313_7F59_4D65_80A4_85….png)

>>16786891

>>16786891

See how the blue roof lights on the right building have a curve and how the blue roof lights on the left are a straight roof line? See pic

Still have the urbanest in line. The cranes are either between those two hotels with blue roofline lights or at urbanest.

As for the white light in middle of LE possibly being white cab light of a crane with red crane light hidden? I’m game. Sure. Let’s tear it up. It would probly mean a third crane as it looks too far away from the other two cranes to be an operator’s cab for either of those.

Will just say this: It could be the Moon because that’s where it rises, in the East. But so what, right? I think we are all open to reconsidering the ‘’moon’. Unrelated to that but just a reminder- the 24LONDON pic which does show the 2 red crane lights behind LE also matches the MILLBANK building light pattern for LISA on CHRISTMAS DAY +/- 1. So we now have 2 sauces showing 2 red crane lights, one of them also a compelling match for MILLBANK as seen in LISA.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

fa237c  No.16787231

File: 9cddd590b144d88⋯.png (613.43 KB, 1433x829, 1433:829, ClipboardImage.png)

File: f9cf123fb7ed656⋯.png (3.86 MB, 2089x1413, 2089:1413, ClipboardImage.png)

File: 2601a921dcfb14c⋯.png (3.24 MB, 2089x1413, 2089:1413, ClipboardImage.png)

File: 5527091cc905467⋯.png (692.11 KB, 1413x821, 1413:821, ClipboardImage.png)

File: 479883dffd5edaf⋯.png (1.27 MB, 1217x917, 1217:917, ClipboardImage.png)

06-DEC-2013-P [1 RED LIGHT]

14-DEC-2013-T [2 RED LIGHTS, CRANES]

25-DEC-2013-T [1 RED LIGHT]

24LONDON ??-DEC-2013-T [2 RED LIGHTS, CRANES]

ROT_1 ??-DEC-2013-T [2 RED LIGHTS]

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

fa237c  No.16787322

>>16781649

Starting with the observed evidence rather than with an idea or a theory, is the inductive approach. It's not better, it's not worse, but it is one of at least three ways to approach an investigation of a scene.

1. ROT_1 showed two red lights but it did not show cranes.

2. The red lights in ROT_1 appear very near where there is a single red light in video of 14-DEC-2013-P.

3. 06-DEC-2013-P vid showed a single red light. It did not show a crane.

4. Pictorial evidence shows two red lights which possibly were on cranes. Or on the ferris wheel. Or on buildings.

5. Pictorial evidence shows a single red light which possibly was on a crane. Or on a building.

Process of elimination might be applied with caution.

> You are forgetting your own sauce on 14DEC

Not forgotten. 14-DEC-2013 was specifically mentioned.

>That’s ridiculous for you to now say they could be on the London Eye.

The red lights in ROT_1 are evident but not so are cranes. Starting with the observed evidence in the camera frame, these lights, which have yet to be identified with certainty, could have been on cranes, buildings, or the ferris wheel.

Whether or not there is sufficient evidence outside of ROT_1 to rule out either of these possibilities, or to calculate odds so as to eliminate based on very low probability, is the point of the dig and of the analysis of what is dug up.

>Never but never has any pic of LE shown any red lights on the pods. Ffs. Jesus.

Not that you have seen, perhaps.

Your passion is commendable. Digging in by way of deduction or abduction is as valid as by induction. Mixing it up is usually how a scene can be squeezed to reveal more than we know.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

fa237c  No.16787440

The flag pole near The Eye.

https://www.google.com/maps/@51.504545,-0.11898,3a,75y,72.76h,113.63t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1sp9UKVnbVN5j3etpTV5eRPg!2e0!6shttps:%2F%2Fstreetviewpixels-pa.googleapis.com%2Fv1%2Fthumbnail%3Fpanoid%3Dp9UKVnbVN5j3etpTV5eRPg%26cb_client%3Dmaps_sv.tactile.gps%26w%3D203%26h%3D100%26yaw%3D97.90637%26pitch%3D0%26thumbfov%3D100!7i13312!8i6656

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

fa237c  No.16787526

File: 578e867e93871b6⋯.png (510.37 KB, 1046x668, 523:334, ClipboardImage.png)

File: 5d7dfdcd98236a0⋯.png (752.5 KB, 1345x557, 1345:557, ClipboardImage.png)

File: 5fc4f01222043bd⋯.png (775.85 KB, 1050x563, 1050:563, ClipboardImage.png)

File: b63c0ae860d5a92⋯.png (1.24 MB, 1340x673, 1340:673, ClipboardImage.png)

Pic 1, no date assigned, but looks like 2013/2014.

Pic 2-4, no date, Flag pole near The Eye, Queen's Walk.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

fa237c  No.16787620

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

06-DEC-2013-P Night vid The Eye

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TFRPNlRzCuw

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

938b77  No.16788621

>>16787322

Anon, in your previous hard work in researching work near ‘urbanest’, was there a time when you saw only one crane and a later time when there might have been two cranes in that area? I recall you spending some time looking at that construction.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

938b77  No.16788698

>>16788621

Of course this won’t win us our prize but knowing exactly when 1 crane became 2 could be an easy piece to place based on anon’s previous work looking around the urbanest area construction. A piece which we would be remiss to place especially if it was easily done. Anon may already have the sauce which might date the placement of the 2nd crane as earlier than 14DEC. Does that help us get closer to dating the EMB pics? Well, not closer but with a great deal more of certainty for a ‘not before’ date-for the EMB Traf_cam pics at least.

I was surprised we did not do more counting of cranes toward the South as well. I think you anons had done a good job with this dig but had left it too soon.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

3da09c  No.16789864

>>16786891

The straight blue lines are the roof of the Park Plaza County Hall hotel

The curved roof belongs to Park Plaza Westminster

Please see >>16786350 and >>16786435

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

fa237c  No.16791176

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Moon over Thames

https://youtu.be/kl2h-UVx5TI

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

fa237c  No.16791421

File: f50c9d97d12d9e8⋯.png (775.53 KB, 1360x768, 85:48, ClipboardImage.png)

File: 57f9822f857e692⋯.png (786.18 KB, 1354x768, 677:384, ClipboardImage.png)

File: 25a70979b82c0cb⋯.png (951.29 KB, 1357x768, 1357:768, ClipboardImage.png)

File: 1ac0536489b730c⋯.png (1015.33 KB, 1357x768, 1357:768, ClipboardImage.png)

>>16791176

Moon seen through The Eye. Note position of moon/Eye within frame vs location of St Thomas Hospital on right side of frame. Note how the moon's position within frame is independent of buildings. Compare with view of moon over St Thomas Hospital after camera location changed as it travelled Victoria Embankment.

In this video, of AUG-2015, the night sky was captured with a camera that shifted its location along the River Thames. While the moon was quite full and shone very brightly, the camera did not capture many other lights above buildings or in vicinity of those rooftops where cranes might have been expected during that time in the redevelopment projects behind the riverside buildings. Now, there were not nearly as many projects in the area within camera frame as there were farther along toward Albert Embankment, but the general idea is well illustrated. If there were more dim lights in the sky, by comparison with the moon, these and the crnes that carried them prolly, not cerltainly, would have become obscured by the movement of the camera, the lense settings and auto adjustments, and by the overall brightness of the moon in the camera lense.

Compare that with the earlier vid/s of crane lights over the Albert Embankment, one of which showed the red lights/ cranes present in one clip but not in another even though all shot at by same camera on same night. This discrepancy was so noticiable that it raised in our discussion the possibility of flashing lights.At the moment the prospect of flashing lights synched across 3-4 locations within frame has diminished the likelihood of the camera having captured flashing or pulsating lights.

This vid can serve as a reference for various features, including those in the night sky, but is not direct evidence for the contents of ROT_1 and other EMB pics, in general.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

fa237c  No.16791531

File: 48862d463445322⋯.png (731.49 KB, 1356x763, 1356:763, ClipboardImage.png)

File: e314150d3e251b4⋯.png (803.16 KB, 1350x768, 225:128, ClipboardImage.png)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

fa237c  No.16791636

File: 60b625d68265bf4⋯.png (496.22 KB, 1360x768, 85:48, ClipboardImage.png)

>>16791176

Moon over Thames, 16-DEC-2014, London UK. (timelapsed)

https://youtu.be/t1ufG8oAPzI

Year after currently estimated time interval for EMB pics, however, big moon as seen from Victoria Embankment looking toward The Eye. Different time of night, too, perhaps, if the bright object in ROT_1 was the moon.

And there appear to be 2 red lights on cranes in the right side of frame, in approx location of the cranes discussed above by anons regarding projects behind the riverside facades. In this vid the camera was on a tripod for the timelapse; and the images were recorded as still photos and then compiled into a stream of images for the video. The dimmer lights vis-a-vis the other bright objects, including the moon, still came out more clearly prolly as a consequence of photos v vdeo and camera adjustments set rather than on auto, and so forth.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

3da09c  No.16791771

File: da71311570eab62⋯.jpg (70.75 KB, 620x413, 620:413, Skyloft_friends_night_out_….jpg)

>>16786877

The video from 6 December a valiant anon was kind enough to shorten and post as >>16773003 looks like one red light on a crane behind the Eye. Would that not shorten the time for the appearance of the second crane to after 6 December, but before the 14th? I'd like to count 6 December as out for the date of ROT1.

On a different note, is it agreed that our mysterious purple building is the Park Plaza Riverbank hotel?

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

fa237c  No.16791909

File: 0b5b6bbca7f5f60⋯.png (1.96 MB, 1360x699, 1360:699, ClipboardImage.png)

>>16787526

Flag and pole relative to The Eye and other markers near The Queen's Walk side of River thames.

This GE image from summer 2013 also shows the various buildings and features behind The Eye within the camera frame of ROT_1, for reference.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

fa237c  No.16792252

File: 21fcd8fde2dbc59⋯.png (442.38 KB, 1291x676, 1291:676, ClipboardImage.png)

>>16791771

18 Albert Embankment is the address of that pink/ purple building.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

fa237c  No.16792557

File: 6cdbf2fe37e654d⋯.png (198.68 KB, 1060x614, 530:307, ClipboardImage.png)

>>16791771 >>16787231

Having watched the 06-DEC-2013-P vid repetaedly, the plausiblity of two lights aligned within the camer frame is sound and, with the camera movement, this may account for the plusating discussed earlier. However, see attached vidcap; note that the pulsating effect may have been the result of auto features of the camera - such as focus and exposure and framerate. That 'large' light, which looked mishapened or distorted, narrowed to a single red light at the instance recorded in this vidcap.

The vid appears to have captured one red llight but no cranes. This light may have been on the building. It may have been on a crane, perhaps partialy assembled, IDK. Leaning toward a single red light; leaning toward on a crane. However, we need more to make these notions very firm. This is important because if 06 becomes a bookend, its significance grows.

The date for that vid is a POSTED date and so 06-DEC-2013 can fairly be pinned as a not-after-date for THAT video and what it may have captured. How it works with the Q time interval for ROT_1 remains speculative at this moment.

All of this is to say that the case can be made for a single light on or BEFORE 06-DEC-2013. The differences in angles of the various related pics we have at the moment may account for the apperance of one light captured in front of another such that together the pair would appeat to be a single light.

The key comparison may be between ROT_1 and 24LONDON. The camera positions and the framings are close enough to show both the front of The Eye and the area behind that included two red lights in approximately the same location.

moar…

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

fa237c  No.16792560

>>16792557

continued…

24LONDON is a high quality photo. It showed cranes as well as the red lights. ROT_1 is lower quality, in terms of background technicalities, not content, and its camera frame may have been just enough different from 24LONDON that there were no cranes visible. That is, in ROT_1 the cranes, if present, were below and thus obscured by the rooftops.

Earlier, anons compared background buildings re the blue lighting behind The Eye. Making that a touchstone for comparison, the red lights in ROT_1 are close matches for 24LONDON.

We have yet to firmly date 24LONDON which serves as a proxy for LisaMI6; yet it is also a very good Q match for ROT_1 at least in terms of the Southbank.

25LONDON did not capture Victoria Embankment's junction with Northumberland and so its usefulness has been neglected to a large extent in our digs. So far.

Also, 24LONDON clearly showed the red lights on cranes in vicinity of 18 Albert Embankment (pink/purple building), the shrouded tower behind Big Ben, the Speaker's apartments, and, as extensively discussed, the lighting pattern in Millbank Tower, among other significant markers. Its value is high.

So. Dating 24LONDON is of renewed importance, again.

Compared with ROT_1, both KEMP 14-DEC-2013-T and SETTERFIELD 25-DEC-2013-T provide significantly different views of the Southbank. The camera position is closer to the side of The Eye, or slightly behind it, and so the context for the red light/s behind is somewhat lost. Yet these are dated fairly firmly, if we take the stock photo Date Taken on face value. These serve as very good proxies.

But, if we find more evidence to eliminate other types of lighting, these pics may become direct evidence for ROT_1 and the red lights under discussion. We are close to that, I think, when it comes to lighting on the ferris wheel and lighting fixed on buildings, i.e. NOT CRANE MOUNTED. Need more to eliminate non-crane possiblities.

14-DEC-2013-T captured both the red lights and the cranes. 25-DEC-2013-T captured one red light and no cranes. We could assume that this one red light was a) on a crane AND b) present while the other red light was also present just out-of-frame. It is a big assumption with high significance; so best to firm it up very well before building on it.

The interval between these two pics is about 10 days and that overlaps with Christmas Week. This timing may change the probabilities depending on us finding evidence of the lights and cranes in similair positions AFTER 25-DEC-2013 and BEFORE changes to the shrouded tower behind Big Ben.

Not having much luck, so far, in finding late-DEC-2013 and JAN-2014 IMAGES of the area behind The Eye. Night views would be best to capture the lights; day or twilight for capturing the cranes. But we gets what we gets.

At this point, can't rule out that there was only one red light at that particular location on 25-DEC-2013. There may have been two. There may have red lights on cranes PLUS another on a building. It is possible that two lights lined-up closely in the 06-DEC-2013 vid and appeared to be a single light. The cranes were working and their booms were not static and so the parked positions of booms might have varied from night to night. Just a possibility. Of course, in some deployments in London and other big cities, the booms park in a standard way and become predictable markers in the skyline.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

fa237c  No.16792661

File: 990cceeb25d4587⋯.png (1.01 MB, 1360x768, 85:48, ClipboardImage.png)

File: c3a6215149cd628⋯.png (1015.39 KB, 1360x768, 85:48, ClipboardImage.png)

File: da9bafc4384b6a9⋯.png (942.91 KB, 1360x768, 85:48, ClipboardImage.png)

File: 7b4bffd40d8f3da⋯.png (151.34 KB, 362x197, 362:197, ClipboardImage.png)

Reference vidcaps, JUL-2014-P.

Series of vidcaps confirm this recording made AFTER the time interval for the EMB pics and BEFORE winter of 2015/2016. Shrounded tower behind Big Ben no longer shrouded with hoarding. TATT's funnel was white on top.

Views of Southbank from two different angles.

While these vidcaps depict the scene about half-year after the time interval for the EMB pics, some of the development projects might have have overlapped that interval.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

3da09c  No.16792694

>>16792560

The crane positions after working hours tell one of two things. Either the hook is above the first lift for the next day or the very common lifting of the generator used to power the welders. Moving the boom with a hook at the end of the cables can easily induce unwanted swinging. Take a clothesline tied to a shower curtain rod with a weight on the end and try putting the weight in a bucket from over a balcony or stairs. Big swings take a bit to get settled even with a bit of maneuvering (I done this with a crane truck, not nearly as tall but same thing happens) so first lift needs to be above the first load so the riggers just need the hook lowered. The generator thing is to prevent theft of a very expensive piece of hardware

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

fa237c  No.16792704

File: 0964a987bd5cb36⋯.png (1.94 MB, 1360x699, 1360:699, ClipboardImage.png)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

fa237c  No.16792738

File: a20982d744c8072⋯.png (1.75 MB, 1360x699, 1360:699, ClipboardImage.png)

File: 775d3d337269436⋯.png (544.68 KB, 1360x699, 1360:699, ClipboardImage.png)

File: a1b76503087020a⋯.png (771.46 KB, 1360x699, 1360:699, ClipboardImage.png)

File: 5bf58504eef5f37⋯.png (1.11 MB, 1360x699, 1360:699, ClipboardImage.png)

Same development project captured differ times in GE imagery.

Before current time interval for ROT_1.

AUG 2013

After interval for TOT_1

FEB 2014

FEB 2014 - exposure adjusted

JUN 2014

JUN 2014 - exposure adjusted

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

3da09c  No.16792769

File: 9e116d5bacfb938⋯.png (1.72 MB, 1200x800, 3:2, Casson_Square.png)

>>16791909

Sweet!

Slightly southeast of the Park Plaza Westminster I see a construction site. Only dirt remains in what may have been the parking lot for that building which would have been knocked down to make way for the Urbanest. Closer to Southbank Place is the construction site for those other apartment buildings named Casson Square

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

fa237c  No.16792809

File: 674a978e0f6b91f⋯.png (1.36 MB, 1356x671, 1356:671, ClipboardImage.png)

File: 3f9221df568083b⋯.png (1.19 MB, 1347x667, 1347:667, ClipboardImage.png)

File: 684cd7ac0967556⋯.png (1.32 MB, 1356x675, 452:225, ClipboardImage.png)

>>16786877

>>16792738

>>16786927

Cranes on site that would become URBANEST, as per discussion/digz above.

SV-JUN-2012

SV-JUL-2014

SV-MAY-2015

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

fa237c  No.16792851

File: 202285c249f5e07⋯.png (1.63 MB, 1356x676, 339:169, ClipboardImage.png)

File: f4e7bf7ea59aff7⋯.png (1.41 MB, 1356x678, 2:1, ClipboardImage.png)

File: 84f280f13f4d318⋯.png (1.48 MB, 1354x672, 677:336, ClipboardImage.png)

More SV images from target area.

Two CLOSELY positioned cranes still there by

SV-MAY-2014

SV-AUG-2014

Gone by

SV-MAY-2015

So cranes appeared in this target area sometime between SC- MAY-2012 and SV-MAY-2014; and packed up between SV-AUG-2014 and SV-MAY-2015.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

3da09c  No.16792929

File: 613fbad4db547dd⋯.png (1.17 MB, 1920x3075, 128:205, Screenshot_2022_07_24_at_0….png)

Seems Urbanest got approval 30 January 2013

Then stuff got into motion

David Cameron visits South Bank building site

Wednesday 28 May 2014 London SE1 website team

The prime minister visited a construction site on the South Bank early on Tuesday morning.

David Cameron visited the building site at 199 Westminster Bridge Road where a new 1,000-bedroom student residence and private sixth form college is under construction.

"Giving businesses the confidence to invest and create jobs is a key part of our long term economic plan," said David Cameron.

"Balfour Beatty's commitment to spend a record £1 billion on small and medium sized businesses this year is very welcome evidence that this plan is working – supporting thousands of jobs within small and medium businesses, which will give hard-working people economic security for the future."

Nicholas Pollard, Chief Executive Officer, Balfour Beatty Construction Services UK, said: "We are delighted the Prime Minister could be with us today to celebrate our £1 billion spend with small businesses this year, 98% of which are British companies. Small businesses create local jobs and apprenticeships and they are the innovators, engineers and exporters of the future. We are committed to supporting them so that we can build a better Britain together; leaving a lasting legacy in the communities we touch across the UK."

Jonathan Howard, director of SE1-based firm Robert West, a small business providing temporary works and scaffolding which is working on the student accommodation project, said: "We have seen that Balfour Beatty is committed to close and collaborative relationships with locally-based small businesses like ourselves.

"The stability of our relationship with Balfour Beatty allows us to thrive and progress as a business and we welcome additional investment being targeted at smaller businesses like ours.

"We certainly support Balfour Beatty's commitment to increasing spending with small and growing businesses like ours."

The scheme being developed by Urbanest includes new premises for DLD College London.

https://www.london-se1.co.uk/news/view/7592

Private sixth-form college prepares to open in Waterloo

Wednesday 19 August 2015

London SE1 website team

A new private sixth-form college charging up to £43,000 a year will open next month close to Westminster Bridge.

Full article:

https://www.london-se1.co.uk/news/view/8418

So construction is complete in August, some finishing work likely, then open the doors September of 2015

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

fa237c  No.16792937

File: 36f8089175deeb4⋯.png (1.23 MB, 1352x675, 1352:675, ClipboardImage.png)

File: 95ed5c7cb32e034⋯.png (1.2 MB, 1352x680, 169:85, ClipboardImage.png)

File: fcf3aa73e4f05eb⋯.png (1.23 MB, 1351x684, 1351:684, ClipboardImage.png)

File: 070f534f802fe86⋯.png (1.41 MB, 1352x683, 1352:683, ClipboardImage.png)

File: 22f3607c091a1d3⋯.png (694.18 KB, 1295x691, 1295:691, ClipboardImage.png)

>>16792769

Former site of York House.

SV-MAY-2012

Developed, use of two cranes inside parameter of new building.

SV-MAY-2014

Not a very high office tower.

Possibly one crane sometimes lower than the other.

Or one used to setup the other.

SV-JUL-2014

Now location of office tower, Urbanest.

SV-MAY-2015

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

3da09c  No.16792955

File: ef1043933a907c1⋯.png (1.03 MB, 1920x968, 240:121, Screenshot_2022_07_24_at_0….png)

>>16792937

Opened its doors beginning September 2015 as DLD College. Classes at the lower levels and boarding for students aged 14-19 above

https://www.mylondon.news/news/local-news/new-dld-college-london-opens-9982071

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

fa237c  No.16792958

>>16792929

>Seems Urbanest got approval 30 January 2013

30-JAN-2013 Approval

GE-AUG-2013 Cranes already on site, demolition nearly done.

GE-FEB-2014 Cranes still at work.

SV-MAY-2014 Cranes double-teaming.

Means plausible that the two closely positioned red lights, and in some images also cranes, in the ROT_1 and related images were present when these cranes were active.

Highly plausible and highly probable Q match?

If yes, significance?

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

fa237c  No.16792964

>>16792955

Right on, ty anon.

In searching for these lights/cranes, has an alternative been found for the bright object that has been assumed to have been the moon behind The Eye?

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

3da09c  No.16792990

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

>>16792937

>>16792955 (me)

<Possibly one crane sometimes lower than the other.

<Or one used to setup the other

Those two cranes would have also worked on each other adding sections as the building rose.

Climbing tower crane adding tower sections Htc wolffkran 70 st Marys axe

May 14, 2017 Run Time 14:32

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0Mho-Fr5pCk

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

fa237c  No.16793007

File: 3c093c7a22db353⋯.png (1.06 MB, 1354x675, 1354:675, ClipboardImage.png)

File: ce1a1066f4d197c⋯.png (615.39 KB, 1354x675, 1354:675, ClipboardImage.png)

>>16792937

Closeup of the top of boom extension where red light would have been affixed?

Cabin type and position seemed to have varied, based on what is visible in various SV images. Doesn't look like the cab was used at height above surrounding rooftops.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

fa237c  No.16793029

>>16792990

TY Anon. All done in the middle of neighbouring buldings and work below. Amazing, really.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

fa237c  No.16793087

File: 8c7fc022345ed60⋯.png (1.05 MB, 1357x678, 1357:678, ClipboardImage.png)

File: 0720267c9f1b786⋯.png (2 MB, 1360x699, 1360:699, ClipboardImage.png)

>>16792958

>30-JAN-2013 Approval

>GE-AUG-2013 Cranes already on site, demolition nearly done.

>GE-FEB-2014 Cranes still at work.

>SV-MAY-2014 Cranes double-teaming.

ROT_1 time interval falls between pictorial evidence for GE-AUG-2013 (when demo nearly finished) and GE-FEB-2014 (when consruction well underway on lower floors). The timing of the construction work could provide more evidence to narrow the Q interval. That work would have raised the apex of the cranes above the height of the buildings between the site and The Eye.

Here's a neat-but-not-quite view of the target area from a ROT-like vantage, SV-JUL-2014.

Here's a GE-AUG-2013 image marked-up with approximate line of sight from whereabouts of the ROT_1 camera.

Review the previously posted images of the target area and make your observs, frens, re timing of construction and height of cranes.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

fa237c  No.16793091

File: db29ac10fc1a8b5⋯.png (704.5 KB, 1354x663, 1354:663, ClipboardImage.png)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

3da09c  No.16793129

Pedo bear has been nuked, refresh and the little beast is gone

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

fa237c  No.16793202

>>16792694

1. End of day prep for start of next shift.

2. Secure valuable mobile equipment.

Okay, so the appearance of the red lights, atop of cranes, would mean, at the very least, the workday shift had finished? Besides, there'd be some stanards about ending crane work prior to dark?

If, yes, then, we might be able to establish a continunity of position of the red lights from one dated pic to another. Would little to no change in position of the red lights/cranes indicate a gap between active worksite - such as during a holiday period? or would booms be parked in standard 'home' position end of day?

Guessing that the last question will begin with, it depends, as per your previous remarks about end of day prep for start of next day. Or is there much higher likelihood of varied positioning at end of workdays?

If we searched for more views of the positioning of the lights/cranes, is the chance good that we'd find discernible variations as normal and no-changes unusual except during long weekends or other breaks in the work schedule?

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

3da09c  No.16793267

>>16793202

The lights would be required at at night but I'd say we'd need a tourist video to catch one of those cranes moving to see if a night shift was working. I'd say generally come 1700 things would be done, that operator has to climb all the way to the ground from that cab after all.

What would be useful would be the road closures in that area. Did the roads get closed to all but say cement trucks during the project or were there times at night the roads were open to thru-traffic?

If the roads were opened at say 1800 then we could say the site was buttoned up for the night

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

3da09c  No.16793330

>>16793267 (me)

I'm kicking myself right now.

That last pic in >>16792738

I see traffic going around, but the one road next to the railway looks like construction only. The two tower cranes are facing opposite direction in the pic. I see a mobile crane next to the road that seems to be unloading flat beds and placing the material where the south tower crane can bring the stuff up. (again, those pesky swinging hooks)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

fa237c  No.16794039

>>16791771

Kek, I had missed the purple building in the view through the window, distracted as I was by the pleasant countenance of fair maidens afore.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

fa237c  No.16794164

File: 0d5e78aac7922b2⋯.png (1.19 MB, 1354x673, 1354:673, ClipboardImage.png)

File: 692a8f5eac4618a⋯.png (619.46 KB, 1360x768, 85:48, ClipboardImage.png)

File: 339f96cb815e748⋯.png (629.13 KB, 1360x768, 85:48, ClipboardImage.png)

>>16793330

Crane appeared to be assembling or disassembling the other in the SV images on Upper Marsh just before the railroad underpass.

SV-JUL-2014

https://www.google.com/maps/@51.499439,-0.1158715,3a,70.2y,356.16h,102.58t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1sMKteFIZapR8aOX3tj7MvVg!2e0!5s20140701T000000!7i13312!8i6656

Also see SV-MAY-2014 which showed the two cranes at smilair heights. Niether appeared to have an apex above the rooftops nearby. This may account for the presence of red lights and no cranes in some of the available images.

Given the construction work captured in 2014, which had reached the lower few floors, might it be plausible that the late 2013 view of the same worksite would have been occupied by cranes that were hiigher during demolition and lower during the foundation pouring stage of construction? Might the cranes have been taller at the start of demo and were reduced at various stages as the work reached toward ground level? Might at each 'lowering' stage, the view from afar would have shown one crane taller than the other and, thus, appear to be alone - displaying a single red light?

Speculation, all. We do have images with one light and images with two lights and images with and without crane booms displayed.

If the speculation is reasonable, and if the dig continues, we might then look for images of these different stages of demolition/ construction so as to narrow the interval to match the two lights, no crane booms, captured in ROT_1; and the single light captured in the vid 06-DEC-2013-P.

On that vid, what do anons think? Did the vid capture two lights which appeared as a single distorted light source - with one light some distance behind the other and the autofocus on the camera resetting? It was only for a brief instance that the light source appeared as a singel red light. A fraction of a second.

See >>16792557

See mark 1:38 approximately, >>16781408

Even the side views document a now-you-see-it, now-you-don't.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

fa237c  No.16794284

File: c79a119c7190c20⋯.png (1.09 MB, 1352x684, 338:171, ClipboardImage.png)

File: 8b19a9fc2388a89⋯.png (1.2 MB, 1354x674, 677:337, ClipboardImage.png)

>>16794164

SV-MAY-2014 views from Westminster Bridge.

Apex of each crane in these images stood higher than the neighbouring Park Plaza Hotel, which stood between the cranes and The Eye.

If we can find images from 2013, particularly DEC-2013 (and perhaps JAN-2014), we might find proxies to support match with ROT_1.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

938b77  No.16794292

File: bfe15fcaea24b3d⋯.jpeg (392.59 KB, 640x994, 320:497, 842FC890_B74A_45D4_880F_3….jpeg)

File: 820dedb8920694c⋯.jpeg (272.98 KB, 625x882, 625:882, 496056D9_502E_4BC2_9947_B….jpeg)

File: 4f02d72984b265e⋯.jpeg (92.45 KB, 640x682, 320:341, 6B8577BF_43F1_4022_B0A5_E….jpeg)

File: 2e8a4e2b367123f⋯.jpeg (511.6 KB, 640x889, 640:889, FC35EC5E_D670_42E7_937A_7….jpeg)

File: ff918ac19fbac48⋯.jpeg (112.88 KB, 640x789, 640:789, 4F61F8C3_DA6E_4C5F_ABC1_7….jpeg)

>>16773003

Anon, I went to the ‘long’ original vid you mention and it has a posted(?) date of 23NOV2013.

Am left puzzled why you labeled your ‘short’ version of the original as 6DEC2013-P. Can you explain how you came up with the December date?

My current understanding, based on the original vid being from 23NOV2013-P is that we have a single red crane behind LONDON EYE on 23NOV2013.

Followed by the pic 14DEC2014-T

which shows 2 cranes behind LE.

The others following that are linked to the 4 Getty pics (not showing the 2 crane lights behind LE) which were taken in sequence on Christmas Day and having a MILLBANK building lights match with LISAMI6 and also 24LONDON (which pic has 2 red crane lights behind LE).

ROT1 has 2 red lights in the same location as the lights seen in 24LONDON and ALSO has a blurred but compelling MILLBANK lights match with LISA, LONDON 2847 24LONDON and all 4 of the 25DEC2013-T Getty series.

This leads me to surmise we had

1 crane behind LONDON EYE on or before 23NOV2013. We got 2 red crane lights by 14DEC2013 which lights were still seen by CHRISTMAS DAY in the EMB pics.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

fa237c  No.16794303

File: c6f43ee5dbfabbb⋯.png (1.39 MB, 1351x673, 1351:673, ClipboardImage.png)

>>16794284

SV-MAY-2014

York House worksite cranes visible from Parliament Square/ Westminster Bridge Road. Boom apex taller than neighbouring rooftops, as seen from afar.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

fa237c  No.16794337

File: 3ad9a96d544c651⋯.png (372.64 KB, 946x668, 473:334, ClipboardImage.png)

File: c90e0363ddecd0f⋯.png (213.05 KB, 890x692, 445:346, ClipboardImage.png)

>>16794292

https://ok.ru/video/3634365838

vs

https://youtu.be/zNaA22SvLjc

Gud catch, fren. My mistake. Will Correct video and vidcaps, for completion and accuracy. TY.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

938b77  No.16794368

File: 80d7e51e57e5c1f⋯.png (1 MB, 1136x640, 71:40, 44D0A614_8DE9_4B80_8E94_A3….png)

>>16794337

I also saw what may put to rest, mebbe not, the theory (albeit a gud one as I was saying to myself, why didn’t I think if it) of one light behind another. Take another look at the 23NOV2013 vid. I see one crane behind and to the left of the carousel. Looks like a single red crane light.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

938b77  No.16794389

>>16794337

Ah, I see that RU (repost?) is responsible for the disinfo. Hmm

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

fa237c  No.16794433

>>16794292

23-NOV-2013-P showed single red light, during a fraction of a second. For the greater part a larger bright object was captured in approximately the same position behind the Eye (LE).

KEMP 14-DEC-2014-T showed 2 red lights on 2 cranes behind LE.

24LONDON showed 2 red lights on 2 cranes

>ROT1 has 2 red lights in the same location as the lights seen in 24LONDON and ALSO has a blurred but compelling MILLBANK lights match with LISA, LONDON 2847 24LONDON and all 4 of the 25DEC2013-T Getty series.

Fair enough. The matches are much less compelling on some of these views. Different hours of the night perhaps, but that would suggest more activity than has been assumed during Christmas Day.

>This leads me to surmise we had

>1 crane behind LONDON EYE on or before 23NOV2013. We got 2 red crane lights by 14DEC2013 which lights were still seen by CHRISTMAS DAY in the EMB pics.

The red lights showed only in ROT_1; no cranes were captured but your surmise is very reasonable, natch.

And as for the bight white object in the sky behind LE near its hub? Can an alternative to the moon be ruled-out based on the pictorial evidence alone or must that rely on reasonable conjecture alone?

Asking not because in disagreement; need to make each underlying stepping stone as rock solid as possible.

Red lights in approximate position within camera frames is more solid when cranes are also visible, for example. But many multiples of red lights/ no cranes that occupy the same approximte position within camera frame is more solid than a one-off from a different angle or vantage.

So the support the conjecture, we need more evidence, IMO, even though it would be great to reach conclusions sooner rather than later.

Your reasoning is very good and it stitches together the proxies and the directs. And that fits very well the Q instruction to note upgrades and changes to the surroundings. We have a series of London Pics during the same winter of 2013/2014 and all posted in the context of Spygate and the broader discussion of the origins of whatever it is that Q would have us dig organically.

The process of elimination is like weeding the garden. But the gardner needs to distinguish between what is best tended and what is best discarded. If I rightly remember, Q dropped a London-related text regarding the reality of disinformation and having more than we know.

For Baker, the working summary Anon provided is notable as it marks progress in connecting a wider range of pictorial evidence.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

fa237c  No.16794466

>>16794368

Interdasting, vantage on ground level. Might that be a rooftop light? It appears to be in gud location for a match with the other side-views of the red lights/ cranes.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

938b77  No.16794545

File: 529c87c0b278247⋯.png (1.17 MB, 1136x640, 71:40, 3E0FB3E7_7CC7_440D_B109_46….png)

File: 5009e7b14a23efa⋯.png (1.18 MB, 1136x640, 71:40, 4AE7480B_C600_4037_8DD4_7F….png)

File: 5735f8076bd74d6⋯.png (1.32 MB, 1136x640, 71:40, 4A1AD97F_9E11_42A1_8FB0_ED….png)

>>16794433

>And as for the bight white object in the sky behind LE near its hub? Can an alternative to the moon be ruled-out based on the pictorial evidence alone or must that rely on reasonable conjecture alone?

I have to say I won’t rule out. I have kept silent on it, but not because I cling to it. I just have nothing to add to the conversation yea or nay. Am keeping an open mind.

I will just say only atm that that 14DEC2013-T pic is the best sauce we have of that area behind LE. Re-look at the 23NOV vid. I honestly got completely turned around in watching the South Bank Christmas village sequence.

I would think I was looking to landward only to notice the riverbank lights behind the stalls.

Having said that, what do you think of these pics? Is that LE behind the stall? If so, where is that white light from?

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

fa237c  No.16794558

>>16794368

Mark 4:39 in the 23-NOC-2013-P vid?

If there was a second light behind the first, the camera frame at that moment in the vid might not have shown enough to the left of frame to capture the approximate location of a second crane light. Thinking the 2nd crane, if present, would have appeared farther from the 1st crane, especially from ground level. Maybe not, IDK.

Compare:

Kemp

https://media.128ducks.com/file_store/f9cf123fb7ed6563414d0a96001c383a00fbb2cb63bfb58c9f826be079ff11c8.png

Setterfield

https://media.128ducks.com/file_store/2601a921dcfb14cc1f3db0c0bf5a518927bd458b19612497b68d8d3d0738bd33.png

23-NOV-2013-P

https://youtu.be/zNaA22SvLjc?t=948

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

938b77  No.16794602

>>16794558

>Mark 4:39 in the 23-NOC-2013-P vid?

Affirm

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

fa237c  No.16794638

Reverse views a) from railtracks looking back toward LE and b) from within the new building looking toward LE.

a

https://www.ahmm.co.uk/assets/galleries/311/2775_007.jpg

b

https://www.ahmm.co.uk/assets/components/phpthumbof/cache/3338_11039_N741.2c3425ad06bcdd5cc23c4ec77eca20e1.jpg

Moar at Architect's website. AHMM.

https://www.ahmm.co.uk/projects/education/westminster-bridge-road/

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

938b77  No.16794656

File: cc7b89a8d568735⋯.png (202.19 KB, 1136x640, 71:40, AA171449_91F9_43FD_83B8_85….png)

File: fb2a4d052aac58c⋯.png (547.63 KB, 1136x640, 71:40, F623B65D_311A_4A3A_8D21_E5….png)

>>16794545

Although- I can’t see any white light in this view of LE from the same vid 23NOV2013-P.

Honestly? A white light from a crane operator’s cabin seems too far away from the 2 suspected cranes in ROT1. If it was a cabin light in ROT1 I honestly think it would have to be from a THIRD crane. Which crane would have to appear, IMHO, after the 14DEC2013-T pic.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

fa237c  No.16794683

File: 86631c00360a275⋯.png (551.31 KB, 1360x768, 85:48, ClipboardImage.png)

File: 089f3f51cf8f1ae⋯.png (678.44 KB, 1360x768, 85:48, ClipboardImage.png)

File: 7c7a481ee8845eb⋯.png (655.21 KB, 1360x768, 85:48, ClipboardImage.png)