/qrb/ - QResearch Bunker

Dough

https://fullchan.net/?23867bdad3d9376b#Bq9PhpnR81mUNbBoRrTRM5TwfPXQMwJSjHDC3JCme3M7

Barbados Ousts Q of E

BREAKING: Barbados now officially a republic, ousting British queen and inaugurating its first-ever President

https://twitter.com/breaking911/status/1465534187872694273

>>112671

>>112670

Preach

TYB

Richard Grenell Retweeted

Rick Loughery

@Rick_Loughery

Looking forward to joining Albania’s Conservative party to talk about the battle against socialism by @yrnf & our young allies around the world.

Shocking concerns uncovered by @RichardGrenell about George Soros and Sec Blinken in Albania

https://twitter.com/Rick_Loughery/status/1465522436275949571

The U.S. Supreme Court announced that it will take up arguably one of the most abortion cases in at least three decades.

The nation’s highest court will hear a direct challenge out of Mississippi to Roe v. Wade’s landmark holding that the Constitution provides a right of access to abortion.

“It’s the case opponents of abortion have long sought and advocates of abortion rights have dreaded, coming before a strongly conservative lineup of justices. Three were appointed by then-President Donald Trump, who said he would choose nominees willing to overturn Roe,” NBC News reported.

“The issue of whether the Constitution provides a right to seek an abortion is not before the court in the Texas challenges, but it is squarely presented in Wednesday’s case. At the heart of it is a Mississippi law — passed in 2018 but blocked by the lower courts — that would ban most abortions after 15 weeks of pregnancy, allowing them only in medical emergencies or cases of severe fetal abnormality. Supporters say the law is intended to regulate ‘inhumane procedures’ and argue that a fetus is capable of detecting and responding to pain by that point,” the report added.

NBC News reported:

The case presents an attack on the court’s landmark Roe v. Wade ruling in 1973 and a follow-on decision in Planned Parenthood v. Casey about two decades later. The court held that a state can impose some restrictions on abortion provided they do not present an “undue burden,” but cannot ban the procedure before fetal viability, generally considered to be 23 to 24 weeks into the pregnancy.

Mississippi said it must be free to take account of advancements in medical knowledge that would shift the point of viability earlier in the pregnancy. But abortion-rights advocates said viability, defined as the time at which a life could be sustained outside the womb, has remained the same since Roe was decided.

In its submissions, Mississippi said the Supreme Court made a fundamental error in its landmark abortion rulings, arguing, “Nothing in constitutional text, structure, history, or tradition supports a right to abortion.” The state also said the court was wrong to rule that state laws outlawing abortion violated a woman’s right to privacy. “Nowhere else in the law does a right of privacy or a right to make personal decisions provide a right to destroy a human life,” it said in its brief to the court.

In a separate case regarding abortion, liberals were angry that the Supreme Court did not issue an opinion last week regarding Texas’ abortion law Monday morning.

Several prominent Democrats attacked the justices for failing to take action in the case and used the opportunity to call for packing the court with liberal justices.

“The Supreme Court has allowed Texas’s abhorrent anti-abortion law to remain in effect for 83 days,” Demand Justice, a pro-court-packing organization run by former Obama administration staffers, tweeted. “We cannot keep waiting for this Court to act in the interests of the American people – it’s time to #ExpandTheCourt.”

“Many guessed the Supreme Court would weigh in on the Texas law today but it turned out to be a giant head fake. It is insane we let the third branch of government conduct itself with so little transparency when it comes to rights this fundamental,” wrote Demand Justice Executive Director Brian Fallon, the former press secretary for Hillary Clinton’s 2016 presidential campaign.

Liberals did not contain their outrage:

“John Roberts playing ‘haha made you look’ when it comes to abortion rights is about all you need to know about this Supreme Court. #ExpandTheCourt,” Demand Justice Chief Counsel Christopher Kang tweeted.

“SERIOUSLY. AN ORIGINAL JURISDICTION CASE,” Vox senior correspondent Ian Millhiser tweeted, using the legal term for disputes between states that go directly to the Supreme Court.

“LOLZ at all of us for thinking that the Supreme Court might do something sensible in an abortion case today,” he added. “The Supreme Court is bad, y’all.”

Last month, Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor complained not happy about the court refusing to block Texas’ six-week abortion law.

Sotomayor called it “catastrophic” that Texas’ abortion ban law was been stopped.

In a seven-page written rant, Sotomayor not only attacked her conservative colleagues, she sensationally claimed that the court “cannot capture the totality of this harm in these pages.”

In September, abortion advocates and providers in the Lone Star State appealed to the high court to hear their arguments against the Texas law, SB 8, before there was a final judgment in a lower federal court “because of the urgency of the harm” the law allegedly causes.

Senate Bill 8, signed into law in May, bars abortions in the state after fetal heart tones are detected, generally around six weeks. It empowers private citizens to sue anyone involved in providing an abortion after the establishment of heart tones.

>>112675

Tasmania has just banned people who have been in ANY overseas location, not including New Zealand's South Island, from entering the state.

https://twitter.com/9NewsPerth/status/1465553504425103361

IMPORTANT PART OF THE INSIDER ARTICLE BELOW INCLUDING IMAGE OF FLIGHT FREQUENCY OF EPSTEINS PLANE, COLOUR CODED=

https://www.businessinsider.com/faa-accidentally-released-jeffrey-epsteins-flight-records-2021-10?r=US&IR=T

The new FAA records also reveal 704 previously unknown flights taken by Epstein's planes. These include hundreds of trips from a three-year gap in the public record, from 2013 to 2016, when the jets' movements were unaccounted for.

Jeffrey Epstein’s private jet activity,

1995–2019

NOTE THEY HAVE MONETISED THE INFO TO THE FLIGHT DATABASE, SO YOU HAVE TO SIGN UP TO GET THE DETAILS

>>112678

Flynn's Banner can be separated into 6 blocks of 20 squares.

>>112678

Michael P Senger

@MichaelPSenger

Exciting news from New Zealand, where PM Jacinda Ardern has given her people permission to use the bathroom inside their friends’ homes.

https://twitter.com/MichaelPSenger/status/1465358285888897029

uh......

https://twitter.com/kenvogel/status/1465464114164162568

@kenvogel

The $$$ kept flowing to CHRISTOPHER STEELE & FUSION GPS even after the @JusticeOIG

issued a report raising doubts about the reliability of their highest profile project, the STEELE DOSSIER. https://nytimes.com/2019/12/09/us/

TDIP & Daniel Jones back in the news again again

>>112683

https://www.nationalenquirer.com/weird-news/lyndon-johnson-lbj-sex-scandals-secrets/

Lyndon Baines Johnson: America’s Most Pervy Prez!

Nov 3, 2015

President Lyndon B. Johnson was a “sexual gorilla” who put an alarm on the Oval Office door so he could use it as his private brothel, an explosive new book reveals!

Incredibly, the Texas Terror openly boasted about his conquests and thought nothing of copping a feel right in front of his wife, Lady Bird, who tolerated his crude antics for the same reasons Hillary Clinton puts up with her skirt-chasing hubby, Bill — blind ambition and political power!

In “Lady Bird and Lyndon — The Hidden Story of a Marriage that Made a President,” author Betty Boyd Caroli says the Democrat reveled in his “physical power” and the number of notches on his belt.

The man who took over the presidency after John F. Kennedy was assassinated loved to brag “he had more women by chance than JFK had on purpose,” Caroli says.

And he’d boast to White House reporters about his studly status, saying, “Take no notice of me coming in and out of a few women’s bedrooms. That is none of your business.”

But sometimes his shenanigans were hard to ignore.

One of the First Lady’s staffers recalls, “nearly every time I saw him, it was a squeeze on the butt, or putting his arm around my waist and pulling me to his side.”

He warned another young aide: “If you wear a tight dress like that, you are going to get your bottom pinched.”

A few days later, he phoned the same girl and ordered her to get “rested up … hair fixed real pretty…get perfumed up.”

This was his way of saying he wanted a “matinee” — his term for lunchtime sex.

His favorite playmates included glamorous Texas secretary Mary Margaret Wiley, who eventually married Jack Valenti, Hollywood’s most powerful lobbyist.

There was talk that Mary, not Lady Bird, performed “all the wifely chores” for LBJ.

But a White House aide insisted this was just “vicious” gossip — that Mrs. Johnson kept the father of her daughters Luci and Lynda happy.

But not happy enough!

Advertising exec Madeleine Duncan Brown claimed her son, Steven, was sired by LBJ.

After the politician died in 1973, she received a letter from a lawyer promising to “continue with the financial arrangements that Lyndon provided for you and Steve.”

@Breaking911

BREAKING: CDC now says all fully vaccinated adults should get a COVID booster shot - https://breaking911.com/just-in-cdc-no

https://twitter.com/Breaking911/status/1465437392291123210

@Breaking911

Pfizer expected to seek FDA authorization for boosters for those ages 16 and 17 - CNN

https://twitter.com/Breaking911/status/1465463249776824322

Kyle Becker

@kylenabecker

They only have one policy response. Ever.

The original four patients found with Omicron were all "fully vaccinated." Do these "experts" do anything beside shill so-called vaccines for Big Pharma?

https://twitter.com/kylenabecker/status/1465502708459319296

>>112686

>>112690

nobody can

>>112692

late night dankness

kek

https://twitter.com/EricTrump/status/1465312700787998723

Hitting wall naow

BED calling

Blessings anons & g'nite

til tomorrow....

>>112667

tyc

>>112700

nite frby

morn'n baker has the ball

>>112701

>morn'n baker has the ball

o7

See dis?

https://www.aviarlabs.com/

>>112677

>>112703

nailed it

chickens com'n home to roost

CNN’s Chris Cuomo Used Media Sources to Dig into Andrew Cuomo’s Accusers

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2021/11/29/cnns-chris-cuomo-used-media-sources-to-dig-into-andrew-cuomos-accusers/

Hmmmm…Criminals only act up in liberal cities?

https://oregoncatalyst.com/56328-hmmmmcriminals-act-liberal-cities.html

As you may have heard, the United States in 2020 hit a record 30% crime spike, the largest year-to-year ever recorded.

These particular cities have been a driving force.

On Day 1 of Ghislaine Maxwell Trial AUSA Pomerantz Tells Story of 14 Year Old Jane and Massage Tables

https://matthewrussellleeicp.substack.com/p/on-day-1-of-ghislaine-maxwell-trial-e06

SDNY COURTHOUSE, Nov 29 – Ghislaine Maxwell, charged with sex trafficking and other charges, faces a November 29, 2021 trial today, after the November 23 final-final pre trial conference, vlog here.

On October 29 and again on November 12 Maxell and the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York filed a flurry of motions in limine, heavily redacted; the Government argued that trial exhibits are not public and will be withheld. Inner City Press opposed and opposes the continued secrecy.

The entire morning of Day 1 was devoted to the final selection of the jury. Inner City Press live tweeted it here (vlog on way in here; podcast midway through here)

Midday vlog here.

At 2 pm, the government's opening statement. Inner City Press live tweeted here:

Ghislaine Maxwell has been taking notes at far side of the defense table, next to the marble wall. Now Assistant US Attorney Lara Pomerantz is getting set in the glassed-in COVID podium, as the jurors come in. It's on.

Judge Nathan sings the praises of the overflow courtrooms; no mention of the denial of public call-in line such as exists, right this moment, in DDC, and these days by other SDNY judges. With #Omicron travel restrictions, should the denial of call-in line change?

AUSA Pomerantz: I want to tell you about Jane. She turned 14 years old that summer when a man and a woman walked by. The man said he was a donor who gave scholarships to students at this camp. The woman asked for her phone number. It began a nightmare.

AUSA Pomerantz: The man and woman were predators. Jane was not their only victim. There were other young girls. Who was that woman? It was the defendant, Ghislaine Maxwell. The defendant took these girls on shopping trips and won their trust. She talked sex

AUSA Pomerantz: There were times she was in the room when it happened. That is why we are here today. Between 1994 and 2004 the defendant sexually exploited young girls. She preyed on them and served them up to be sexually abused. She was trafficking kids for sex

AUSA Pomerantz: ..He owned a ranch in New Mexico, an apartment in Paris, a mansion in Manhattan, Palm Beach, a private island. Epstein has private planes and pilots. The defendant got to enjoy that luxury right along with Epstein.

AUSA Pomerantz: The defendant was the lady of the house. She imposed rules. Employees were to hear nothing, see nothing, say nothing. There was a culture of silence. That was by design. The defendant's design.

AUSA Pomerantz: They had a play book: get access, gain trust. They often targeted the daughters of single mothers, struggling to make ends meet. They made these girls feel seen. But that was a cover.

AUSA Pomerantz: To get the girls to touch Epstein, they used the cover of massage. The defendant massaged Epstein then told the girls to do it. Epstein brought girls into his massage room every single day. It was sexual abuse.

AUSA Pomerantz: Before I describe those so-called massages, let me say: these are the facts. Epstein touched the teenage girls with equipment... He sometimes penetrated... The defendant helped Epstein find those girls, for so-called massages.

AUSA Pomerantz: They lured their victims with a promise of a brighter future then destroyed their lives. The defendant was jet-setting in private planes. [Note: And holding press conferences at the UN, getting Antonio Guterres' official Amir Dossal on her board]

AUSA Pomerantz: So what happened to Jane? You will hear from her. Someone from Epstein's office invited her to Epstein's house. He told her mother he was offering a scholarship. Jane was 14 - a kid. Epstein was in his early 40s, the defendant in her early 30s

AUSA Pomerantz: Jane traveled to New York to Epstein's mansion, where he abused her. She was not the only one. You will learn about multiple girls during the course of this trial. You will learn about a 16 year old girl who traveled to the ranch in New Mexico

AUSA Pomerantz: The defendant told the girl she was going to give her a massage. But she touched her elsewhere. The girl was 16 years old. There's a 17 year old, spotted in a parking lot. The driver pulled over. [Maxwell puts on her glasses and jots down notes]

...much moar..

https://babylonbee.com/news/white-smoke-emanates-from-wuhan-lab-chimney-signaling-a-new-variant-has-been-named

this is who is starting the Flynn/Linwood sheitz

>>112714

Sommer and madcow?

Shocked

>>112701

mornin wakers

g's got me up early but not too

howza

heat runnin here

Researchers have discovered the world’s first living robot that can uniquely replicate itself. Scientists have dubbed them Xenobots, robots made from the stem cells of the Xenopus laevis, an African clawed frog.

The stem cells have tiny little hairs called cilia that help them move around a petri dish. The Xenobot project was first unveiled in 2020. Thanks to a group of scientists who found that they could move, work together in groups and self-heal.

https://fossbytes.com/worlds-first-living-robots-that-look-like-pac-man-can-now-reproduce/

>>112717

>replicate

Pretty sure requested Stargate, not replicators

>>112716

yeah man here tooz. chilly willy out dare

>>112722

little pepes replicatin

kek

>>112719

>>112724

Q1369…

Jeff Sessions gets a mention 2 days ago in the Daily Beast…

https://www.thedailybeast.com/if-merrick-garland-doesnt-charge-trump-and-his-coup-plotters-our-democracy-is-toast

The Department of Justice announced this week that it would crack down on airline passengers who throw tantrums. Now, if Attorney General Merrick Garland would only get around to doing something about people who plot the overthrow of our government and a former president who’s serially obstructed justice and abused power we might be getting someplace.

Not that in-flight safety isn’t important. It is. Just like it’s important to arrest and prosecute the moron Trumpist foot soldiers who stormed the Capitol on Jan. 6. All that is important. But it is not enough.

President Joe Biden may get everything else right but if his administration—starting with the Department of Justice—gets wrong its response to the threats to our democracy posed by Trump and the GOP, nothing else they do may matter.

A widely respected jurist, Garland was picked by Biden to depoliticize the DOJ and end the abuses of its power we saw under Trump appointees Jeff Sessions and Bill Barr. Certainly, he has made some strides in that direction. But if the result of his de-politicization is tiptoeing around the egregious serial wrongdoing of the leaders of the Republican Party, then his efforts will have exactly the opposite of the intended effect. By failing to hold Trump and Co. accountable, Garland will set the stage for them to continue unabated their efforts to turn the U.S. into a one-party state in which only Republicans can win elections and any tactics they may use to hold on to power will have been effectively validated by the inaction of Garland and his DOJ.

Garland has, on more than one occasion, already taken steps that have actually empowered or emboldened those who currently pose a threat to our system. A particularly egregious example of this was Garland’s decision to take the side of Trump by arguing that the former president was acting in his official capacity when he lied and defamed journalist E. Jean Carroll following her accusation that Trump had raped her long before he was elected president.

Garland’s position was defended by allies who argued that he was an “institutionalist” who felt it was his duty to defend presidential prerogatives. But what he was actually doing was defending the abuse of power and, however inadvertently, demonstrating that our institutions may face no threat quite so grave as that posed by self-anointed “institutionalists.”

Recently, Garland has won praise for having had the Justice Department enforce contempt of Congress charges against disheveled Trump crony Stephen Bannon. However, the DOJ decision to bring charges against Bannon took weeks when it should have taken minutes. The case was clear-cut. Bannon ignored a legitimate Congressional subpoena, claiming rights he did not have.

I have been counseled by wise and respected friends, like former U.S. Attorney and Deputy Assistant Attorney General Harry Litman, that we should be grateful for the Bannon decision because it will empower the Congress to do its job. I understand the view. But this Congressional investigation has a clock running on it. If the GOP retakes the House next November, as many are currently predicting, the investigation into the Jan. 6 coup attempt will be instantly ended by the Republicans. So for all those called by the committee, it may appear that all they have to do to avoid suffering any consequences for their action is to stall just as Bannon is doing. In this case, justice delayed will most certainly be justice denied.

More troubling to me though is that the only reason we are hearing of any case being brought against Bannon as a senior coup plotter (or upper middle management in any case) is because Congress is investigating the events of Jan. 6. We have not heard a peep out of the Department of Justice about prosecuting those responsible for inciting, planning or funding the effort to undo the lawful transfer of presidential power to the man the American people elected, Joe Biden.

We also have not heard a peep out of them in terms of prosecuting the dozen instances of clear obstruction of justice that Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s report cited against Trump. We have seen that Garland is letting the highly politicized investigation of special prosecutor John Durham into the conduct of the Trump-Russia investigation continue (by continuing its funding). We therefore have the real prospect that those who sought to look into the Trump-Russia ties that both Mueller and Congressional investigations have demonstrated were real, unprecedented and dangerous might be prosecuted while those who actively sought the help of a foreign enemy to win an election will not be.

Other wise and experienced legal observers for whom I have massive respect argue that further patience is in order, that we don’t know what Garland is doing behind the scenes and we should give him more time. One such person is former U.S. attorney Barbara McQuade. She said to me, “While I understand the frustration that DOJ has not yet charged higher-level defendants in the Jan. 6 attack, I think that it is not yet time to be angry with AG Garland for inaction. We don’t know what investigative steps may be occurring because of the grand jury secrecy requirement. Robert Mueller spent almost two years on his investigation. I would expect this investigation to take at least that long.”

A.G. Gill, another analyst of these matters for whom I have great respect, creator and host of the Daily Beans and Mueller She Wrote podcasts, argues caution for another reason. She feels there are efforts afoot to turn public opinion against Garland and DOJ as a way of weakening and discrediting these institutions.

And yet Garland’s behavior to date has left me apprehensive. Conversations I have had with folks inside DOJ have not eased those concerns. There, frustration with Garland begins with his management style (which insiders liken to that of a judge running his chambers in which his office is a kind of bubble apart from the department and staffed by a small team akin to the clerks he had when he was in the judiciary).

It extends to concerns that he will err too far in the name of caution and a desire not to be perceived as political. This too is a hold-over from his court days and ignores that A) he is a political appointee, B) the issues he is dealing with are hyper-politicized and c) there is no way to prosecute politicians for crimes committed in the name of partisanship without appearing political.

But, still, I’ll admit it. I hear our judicial clock ticking as loudly as Mona Lisa Vito’s biological clock. Given that the stakes are so high and seeing some of the decisions Garland has made, I am wondering when it is ok to become alarmed, when it is ok to become angry.

I asked Slate senior editor and host of the “Amicus” podcast, Dahlia Lithwick whether my burgeoning anger was acceptable, and she responded: “I was already pretty OK about getting mad at this last summer. It’s possible to admire and honor all the good and vitally necessary initiatives undertaken by Garland’s DOJ, to rejoice in his principled efforts to reinstate the wall between the Justice Department and the White House that Bill Barr and Donald Trump had reduced to a picket fence, and still to be maddened by the DOJ’s evident hope that a reckoning over Trump’s lawlessness can be left to prosecutors in New York and the Congress.”

She continued, making an important historical point: “When the Obama Administration opted to draw a line under the Bush era torture and rendition programs, it didn’t disappear the past, it just buried it. And given that Trump’s election denialism is emphatically not in the past—according to a November poll from the Public Religion Research Institute, 68 percent of Republicans believe the 2020 election was ‘stolen’ from Donald Trump. That growing number doesn’t just foment doubt in election integrity and the rule of law, it’s being used to pass election suppression and democracy subversion measures in states around the country. The ‘big lie’ that seeded Jan. 6 has become the litmus test for GOP loyalty. I understand that the optics of prosecuting one’s political enemies and criminalizing fiery speech and politics is a chilling callback to the McCarthy era. But the lies and violence and white supremacy and misogyny of Jan. 6 isn’t buried in the past, it’s metastasizing and spreading in ways that threaten the future as well.”

Revered legal scholar, Laurence Tribe, who taught Garland when the attorney general was a student at Harvard Law School, suggests we give his former student a little more time, but not an unlimited amount. He hears the clock ticking too. Tribe told me, “If Merrick Garland hadn’t authorized the Bannon indictment when he did, I’d certainly have gotten mad long since. At least with respect to someone like me, he bought a few weeks with that indictment—but not a few months.”

“All things considered,” he continued, “I’ll be both disappointed and angry if we find ourselves going into January 2022 without strong evidence—in a town that leaks like a sieve—that DOJ is moving full speed ahead on holding Trump and his enablers, facilitators, funders and co-conspirators criminally accountable for the coup d’état they tried to pull off and the violent insurrection they mounted against the Capitol to delay, obstruct and, if possible, subvert the solemn electoral proceeding there underway.”

That too, makes sense to me. What is certain is this: Time is running out. There is every reason to fear that Trump and the coup plotters will not be held accountable in any meaningful way. If they are not, they will see the inaction of our justice system as a license to continue their attacks on our system of government. What is more, absent an effective Department of Justice effort, those attacks are that much more likely to succeed and to be compounded by even greater abuses. And at that point, all the institutionalists in the world will not be able to put our Humpty Dumpty of a democracy back together again.

>>112733

Can you say Devolution?

Trump Never Got Another Classified Intelligence Briefing After Jan. 6

Out of the Loop

He skipped his classified intelligence briefings for the holidays. And then, after his Jan. 6 briefing didn’t happen, he never got another one, a new CIA book reveals.

After a holiday break where he didn’t receive a classified intelligence briefing, President Donald Trump was supposed to get one on Jan. 6, 2021—the day he incited a violent attack on the U.S. Capitol. It didn’t happen. And then he didn’t get one for the rest of his presidency.

That unusual stretch where the president didn’t receive a regular classified briefing is recounted in the latest version of a book published and regularly revised by the Central Intelligence Agency, which describes how spies update presidents on national security matters.

The situation in the waning days of Trump’s presidency was so uncommon that it actually caused concern among some administration officials that Trump was losing touch with reality, as he was getting unhinged advice on domestic issues from Justice Department attorneys and outside counsel that openly advocated rejecting election results.

"There was no certainty that he was getting objective, unbiased information in any other way,” one source familiar with the matter told The Daily Beast. “You couldn’t trust that anybody around him was able to get that information to him in that period of time."

Unlike past presidents—who would read their daily intelligence report and occasionally get briefed by a CIA officer—Trump regularly refused to read the text, demanded “killer” pictures, and preferred to get updated in person by his daily briefer.

While past presidents took great interest in having the most up-to-date information on security challenges and foreign intelligence, the CIA book that was updated last month revealed that Trump spent two days a week receiving the latest sensitive information coming in from American spies all over the globe, in sessions running 45 minutes on average.

That came to a halt in late 2020, however, according to the CIA’s “Getting to Know the President” book, written by a revered former inspector general at the agency, John Helgerson.

Trump took a vacation break over the holidays when he traveled to Mar-a-Lago and told his briefer “he would see her later,” Helgerson wrote. The president then went two weeks without that pivotal one-on-one update, unlike his predecessor, former President Barack Obama, who was known to read the daily report even while vacationing in Hawaii.

During that break, Trump and his closest advisers kept busy trying to overturn election results in Arizona, Georgia, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin by peddling disinformation and supporting conspiracy-laden legal challenges that eventually went bust. There was his infamous phone call demanding that Georgia’s top elections official “find 11,780 votes,” not to mention his despotic attempt to get the U.S. Supreme Court to declare Wisconsin’s election “unconstitutional.”

The White House finally scheduled a briefing when he’d be back in the nation’s capital. Trump was apparently too busy that day—spending Jan. 6 inciting a riot by delivering a speech and calling on his acolytes to “fight like hell” and march on the Capitol building just as Congress was certifying the 2020 election results.

The CIA book says, “the briefings were to resume on 6 January but none were scheduled after the attack on the Capitol.”

The break for the holidays and the two-week stretch after the insurrection meant that Trump went without the briefings for nearly his entire final month in office, a pause that experts found unprecedented.

“It’s not unusual to miss one here or there. But it’s unusual to go several weeks without a briefing,” said Matthew Kroenig, a former intelligence official who developed strategies to counter China, Iran, North Korea, Russia, and terrorist networks.

“Whether you like him or not, he was the commander in chief. As a nation, we would have been safer if he would have been getting those briefings,” said Kroenig, who is now the deputy director of the nonprofit Atlantic Council’s Scowcroft Center for Strategy and Security.

When asked by The Daily Beast, the CIA wouldn’t answer why Trump stopped receiving briefings during that time. Three former intelligence officials said that scheduling the briefings would have been up to the White House, which was busy during the last two weeks fighting off accusations of an attempted coup and preparing for an impeachment fight.

The CIA also would not say if Trump has received them since he left office, although President Joe Biden went on record in February saying that his predecessor should no longer receive them.

Trump’s post-presidential office did not respond to questions Monday evening.

Helgerson, a career spy who has since retired and was contracted to write the book, declined to provide additional details on the sudden halt in briefings to The Daily Beast on Monday, citing strict limitations imposed by the agency.

The CIA book’s new chapter also described at length how Trump himself posed a challenge for the nation’s intelligence officials, especially at the beginning of his presidency, when he was mired in accusations of suspicious ties to Russia and lashed out against the nation’s surveillance networks.

“​​For the Intelligence Community, the Trump transition was far and away the most difficult in its historical experience with briefing new presidents,” the book states. “Rather than shut the IC out, Trump engaged with it, but attacked it publicly.”

A subsequent portion quotes Obama’s outgoing director of national intelligence, James Clapper, saying that Trump was “fact-free” and prone to “fly off on tangents; there might be eight or nine minutes of real intelligence in an hour’s discussion.”

Some national security experts have pointed out that, while Trump stopped receiving the classified updates, many of those surrounding him still did. As Helgerson noted in his revised edition to the book, then-Vice President Mike Pence “was an assiduous, six-day-a-week Reader” who would often join the president in his brief and spark a thoughtful discussion about pressing matters. Then again, by the end of his presidency Trump had turned on Pence and was notorious for relying on Fox News and Newsmax hosts for a steady stream of unverified information.

Larry Pfeiffer, a former CIA chief of staff who also ran the White House’s Situation Room during the Obama administration, stressed that keeping the president informed during his final weeks in office would have been pivotal. He said the month-long stretch without a briefing was the most alarming detail in the book’s latest update.

“Given how complicated the world is today, and given the kinds of decisions the president should be involved in in the national security arena, I’d be concerned that the president could find himself behind the curve,” he said.

“Iran could have planned some foolish attack, or you could have intel members of the incoming administration acting against current U.S. foreign policy,” he said, making a joking reference to the problems that plagued Trump’s own transition team in 2016.

LMAO

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/11/republican-massachusetts-governor-considering-implementing-vaccine-passports/

Republican Massachusetts Governor Considering Implementing Vaccine Passports

Is there a RINO hunting season in US? Aksin for a fren

>>112735

>Aksin for a fren

been axin for a fren for years about those and bankers, lawyers, demonrats, wokecorp ceos...

JUST IN - Trump demands law and order, deployment of the National Guard amid "smash-and-grab robberies" in many US cities - statement.

Liz Harrington

@realLizUSA

NEW!

President Donald J. Trump:

“If Democrats don’t immediately stop smash-and-grab robberies, which are taking place in their cities, the National Guard must be called out. There has never been such a thing that has happened in our Country. Large numbers of stores are leaving San Francisco and other cities. Some chains are closing most of their stores, it is all not even believable.”

8:56 AM · Nov 30, 2021·Twitter Web App

https://twitter.com/realLizUSA/status/1465681080829321221

Maxwell was the arrest to trigger mass awakening - Q verified here.

"Argument: "Maxwell is not a big enough name to trigger a mass awakening." [example]

Counter-argument: Do not make statements based on assumption of 'worth' and/or 'value'. Do not think 'today' but rather 'after' today."

>>112738

"Crimes against Children"

Look what just CRT did...

Gonna be fun to watch

>>112740

I'll watch

IRL habbenin now

>>112734

checkin in

lookin for muh mollases qookies

gotz to get muh sweetz on yo's

https://gab.com/disclosetv/posts/107366803975760056

Perhaps he will name some names…

https://twitter.com/TrackerTrial/status/1465708775457783819

>>112751

>>112751

this twatter is covering the trial

https://twitter.com/innercitypress/status/1465685105566007307?t=AhrImxcFgWDMR4FP_BofBA&s=19

HOW TO FILE A CRIMINAL COMPLAINT FOR CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY

Interesting presentation on how anons can get involved by filing criminal complaints against the NWO elite.

He provides a working definition of “conspiracy theory” and how the CIA weaponized it to silence dissent.

At the very least, filing a criminal compliant at the local level educates law enforcement on the crimes being committed by the federal government and serves as a disincentive to enforce federal mandates or directives with no legal nor constitutional basis.

https://archive.org/embed/aflds-white-coat-summit-ii-todd-callender-how-to-file-a-criminal-complaint

Beginning today, we will not allow the sharing of private media, such as images or videos of private individuals without their consent. Publishing people's private info is also prohibited under the policy, as is threatening or incentivizing others to do so.

https://twitter.com/TwitterSafety/status/1465683094581792771

So no more videos of protests or riots? I wonder how this would even be enforced?

[They] don't want Trump rallies to be shown. I guess you would have to have proof of permission from every single person in attendance or in the background of the video/picture.

Panic!

posted this yesterday

https://twitter.com/TrackerTrial/status/1465698529012113414?t=n7Nt5v5O9NFoWIoGw9YMBA&s=19

FAA Accidentally Disclosed New Flight Data on Epstein's Private Jets. Now we have more than 2,000 flight records. Just need to see who was on those flights. Elites are getting nervous.

https://www.businessinsider.com/faa-accidentally-released-jeffrey-epsteins-flight-records-2021-10

Meta has been ordered to sell Giphy after the UK's top antitrust watchdog ruled the $400 million deal could harm social media users

"The Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) has today concluded that Facebook's acquisition of Giphy would reduce competition between social media platforms and that the deal has already removed Giphy as a potential challenger in the display advertising market," the CMA said in a statement issued to Insider.

https://www.businessinsider.com/meta-ordered-to-sell-giphy-by-uk-antitrust-regulator-2021-11

@SenatorShaheen on new abortion restrictions going into effect in N.H. & the upcoming Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization case: "I think if you want to see arevolution, go ahead, outlaw Roe v. Wade and see what the response is…" #NHPolitics #WMUR

https://twitter.com/AdamSextonWMUR/status/1465355304221257735?s=20

>>112752

>>112761

>>112763

mornin' all

>>112769

>>112771

mornin F

THE DC MADAM TRIAL IS THE EXACT SAME CRIMINAL ORGANIZATION RUN BY MAXWELL/EPSTEIN, FBI, CIA, DOJ etc.

https://twitter.com/MidNiteMJ/status/1465399017664397322

>>112737

<>believable

1613 (11) (2)

Q !CbboFOtcZs 06/27/2018 19:36:18 ID: d9dd2d

Archive Bread/Post Links: 1931195 / 1931671

Direct Link: 1931671

Q Clock [ Minute: 22 | :25/:55 Mirror: 28 | 180 Mirror: 52 | :35/:05 Mirror: 48 ]

1611 (9) (9)

Q !CbboFOtcZs 06/27/2018 19:21:03 ID:d9dd2d

Archive Bread/Post Links: 1931195 / 1931388

Direct Link: 1931388

Sound familiar?

https://saraacarter.com/grilled-strzok-questioned-by-lawmakers/

Q

>>1931388

Goodlatte on Fox “FBI attorney instructing PS not to answer………answers re: texts not believable.”

Sound familiar?

Rest assured JUSTICE will be served.

Q