/qnotables/ - ===Q Notables===

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/20960050 (031459ZJUN24) Notable: BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY DROPS 99%?!

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

https://x.com/marionawfal/status/1797635909015204121?s=46&t=bnsBEtaYeMmQ4vtvK1QA_A

BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY DROPS 99%?!

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/20960080 (031505ZJUN24) Notable: Proof that NYC’s Trump trial was more unfair than MLK’s 1960s segregationist Alabama trial…

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Proof that NYC’s Trump trial was more unfair than MLK’s 1960s segregationist Alabama trial…

June 3, 2024 (3 hours ago)

Unless you live under a rock, you know by now that President Trump was “convicted” of a “felony.” You also know that his conviction was part of the Deep State’s master plan, concocted the moment Trump announced he was running in 2024. The court, including the prosecutors, judge, and jury, was all hand-picked—the entire setup and outcome were prearranged from the moment they cooked up the plot to make Donald Trump as “unelectable” as possible. They used sham trials that made a mockery of our entire justice system, all to block one man—who isn’t a corrupt, bought-and-sold politician—from returning to the White House to work for free for the people of America. That’s how much our government hates you.

Of course, trumped-up charges, sham trials, and kangaroo courts are nothing new, sadly. One Twitter user, Stephen McIntyre, a Canadian mining exploration company director and consultant, decided to dig deep into the US judicial past. He went all the way back to Alabama in the 1960s, during the height of segregation, to compare the trial against Martin Luther King Jr. to what President Donald Trump went through. And guess what? Surprise, surprise—he found that MLK, back in 1960s Alabama, actually received a fairer trial than Donald Trump did in liberal-run Manhattan in 2024.

Stephen McIntyre:

one important difference between the felony trial of Martin Luther King in all-white segregationist Alabama in 1960 and the felony trial of Donald Trump in 2024: even a segregationist judge permitted King to present expert evidence on tax accounting, whereas the Democrat judge in 2024 prevented Trump defense from presenting highly exculpatory expert evidence on election finance law.

So today’s Democrat courts exercised modes of unfairness that even a segregationist Alabama court in 1960 didn’t attempt.

https://repository.law.indiana.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1064&context=ijlse#page=19.22…

The article is worth reading in full. The intent of segregationist Democrat lawfare against Martin Luther King was “to harm Dr King as much as possible”. Just as the intent of modern Democrat lawfare is to harm Trump as much as possible. Joe Biden, of course, was a protege of arch-segregationist Robert Byrd and modern practitioner of the same tactics.

CONCLUSION The perjury charges against Martin Luther King, Jr. were almost certainly part of Governor John Patterson's effort to derail the Civil Rights Movement in Alabama.276 The opportunistic legal maneuver made Dr. King the first person in Alabama ever prosecuted for perjury related to taxes. As a lawyer, Governor Patterson regularly turned to the courts as a method for preserving the "southern

way of life. »277 The perjury case served as a creative attempt to remove Dr. King as a threat to the system of segregation. Governor Patterson intended that the prosecution itself, along with the way it was executed, harm Dr. King as much as possible. Dr. King could have faced, and he fully expected to spend, up to ten years in prison.

It’s a fascinating comparison. Here’s what folks online are saying about it:

“This is two cases 2 cases where a “jury of your peers” failed the Defendant. I think SCOTUS needs to define peers because many people have been found guilty by jury’s that truly were not peers.”

“So Trump is getting the MLK Jr treatment? That won’t backfire …”

“They have completely Crossed the Rubicon.”

“Wonder why the establishment would try and sabotage both men? Could it be that each could not be controlled and therefore threatened the establishment’s power?”

“This is the rule of lawfare”

Lawfare, indeed.

The Democrats’ latest abuse of power isn’t just a recent trend but part of a longstanding historical narrative of injustice going back to the beginning of time. These modern-day Democrats incessantly project their own wrongdoings onto their political enemies, crafting a cycle of blame to distract from their actions. It’s a strategic deflection that keeps the spotlight off themselves and maintains their grip on whatever narrative they’re pushing or trying to control. Their goal is to make sure that the American people’s scrutiny and attention are always directed somewhere else, other than on them. Corrupt, worldly rulers have been playing these games for ages, and unless the Democrats are stopped this November, they’ll keep doing it for decades to come.

History repeats itself.

https://revolver.news/2024/06/proof-that-nycs-trump-trial-was-more-unfair-than-mlks-1960s-segregationist-alabama-trial/

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/20960087 (031506ZJUN24) Notable: 10:00 AM EDT A Hearing With Dr. Anthony Fauci

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Raskin: you have not been accused of starting a disease before

Fauci: That is True

ummmm AIDs.... he was accused of starting AIDS

Then there's AZT....

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/20960094 (031509ZJUN24) Notable: scientists at the National Institutes of Health (NIH) received $710 million in royalties from drug makers during the pandemic years, from late 2021 to 2023. This information was previously concealed by the NIH.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

🚨🚨BREAKING NEWS

We all learn what we already know. That the government and big pharma are one and the same.

The New York Post reveals thatscientists at the National Institutes of Health (NIH) received $710 million in royalties from drug makers during the pandemic years, from late 2021 to 2023. This information was previously concealed by the NIH.

The majority of these royalties, approximately $690 million, were collected by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) and its 260 scientists.

The data was uncovered through litigation initiated by http://OpenTheBooks.com, which also revealed that between September 2009 and October 2021, NIH scientists received $325 million in royalties across 56,000 transactions.

It is unclear if royalties from Covid vaccines by Pfizer and Moderna are included in the new figures, noting that Moderna settled with the NIH by agreeing to pay $400 million. Dr. Anthony Fauci and his deputy, Dr. David Morens, are also mentioned in the context of evading scrutiny and the need for transparency in their communications and depositions.

https://nypost.com/2024/06/02/opinion/nih-scientists-made-710m-in-royalties-from-drug-makers-a-fact-they-tried-to-hide/

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/20960160 (031519ZJUN24) Notable: Oil prices fall after OPEC+ plans to begin phasing out voluntary cuts in fourth quarter

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>168516

>(We’ll see if this has an effect on pricing later when it reopensbut I doubt it-it may get a temporary bounce but still got that nasty head and shoulders top in it in cap 2)

Nope no bounce and free-falling down 3.5x%

Oil prices fall after OPEC+ plans to begin phasing out voluntary cuts in fourth quarter

Oil futures headed lower on Monday as traders assessed a decision by the OPEC+ to extend cuts by the group into 2025 but to begin unwinding some additional voluntary reductions later this year. Although the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries and its allies at a Sunday meeting agreed to extend production cuts, “it also set a date to start bringing back oil into the markets this year,” said Lukman Otunuga, manager for market analysis at FXTM.

https://www.marketwatch.com/story/oil-prices-mixed-after-opec-plans-to-gradually-unwind-some-production-cuts-60f67f58

https://tradingeconomics.com/commodity/crude-oil

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/20960264 (031540ZJUN24) Notable: USD ends with Saudi Arabia on June 9th…

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

MILLERTIME

@CHASMIL75801620

USD ends with Saudi Arabia on June 9th...

10:13 AM · May 31, 2024

·

105.4K

Views

https://x.com/CHASMIL75801620/status/1796545433449443650

Anons please interpret for me, does this have to do with this post, a couple of days ago

I’m just going to repost a telegram post that was sent to me with no link, but it might explain the Musk/Trump relationship.

OPERATIONS (X) 10 .>]:MARKER and COMMS

3 years ago I gave you the DROPS that Trump was going to get arrested and INDICATED

(2 years ago I gave you the military WIRES>]: that Italy. Russian and EU were sharing all the same information > TRUMP ARREST IMMINENT (and the military would save TRUMP>>>. It was all a set up and military charter knew these EVENTS were coming and they were a placed PLAN)

_NOW you are witnessing important stages of military operations set into motion to EXPOSE a military COUP taking place by the cabal deep state.

>These INDICTMENTS AND GUILTY VERDICT AND ILLEGAL WEAPONIZED JUDICIAL SYSTEM OF THE U.S. GOVERNMENT is going to lead directly to OBAMA> and his lawyers who are funding the operations with the CLINTON’S and CIA, Carnegie Endowment ( Globalist) +

>You have to understand the MILITARY COMMS happening in the public view first that explains PLANNED Movements that can’t be stopped

__just two days before Trump was found guilty of 34 INDICTMENTS …. Trump met with MUSK and they are talking about crypto currency ( they are setting the stage for the future financial system of the United States> North American and middle America that is going to be backed by precious metals) …. This all comes just weeks after MUSK traveled to China to meet XI’s number two man in charge and minister of finances ( XI was there at the meeting in covert ops )….. Then after this meeting days later PUTIN and XI met and they talked about the coming world financial system and BRICS (and also discussed what MUSK ( USSF commander placed by Trump) Said of the U.S. getting ready to build their multi Trillion$$$$$$$$ crypto system with Trump. MUSK+ CHEYENNE USSF OPS

I told you long ago the WORLD ALLIANCE MILITARY OPERATIONS are bringing down the Globalist who control CIA and CORRUPT military intelligence and world deep state banking operations….. And inside this ALLIANCE is TRUMP( U.S.) . MODI( India). Bin Salman (Saudi Arabia) XI ( China)…. They are all working to clean their countries of the CIA and Globalist and XI is going to collapse himself inside a huge CIVIL conflict in his country to bring down the CCP Communist regimen ( later Russia will have a falling out with China >>> but this WILL be STAGED in operations aimed at the CCP and their collapse)…

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/20960454 (031606ZJUN24) Notable: Fuck Fauci

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/20960486 (031611ZJUN24) Notable: Fuck Fauci

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

you saved Millions of Lives

you're a hero

But 17,000,000 People are Dead?!

How is killing 5 People for every 1 person you save a good thing?!

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/20960512 (031613ZJUN24) Notable: Fuck Fauci

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

https://x.com/RepMTG/status/1797658312969736431

Democrats are calling us conspiracy theorists about Fauci and Covid.

Here’s proof of Fauci’s lies.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/20960520 (031614ZJUN24) Notable: @US_TRANSCOM WHO LET THE DOGS OUT? 🐶🔊 🐶🔊 🐶🔊

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

WHO LET THE DOGS OUT? 🐶🔊 🐶🔊 🐶🔊

#ICYMI Maj. Gen. Henderson, USTRANSCOM Chief of Staff, recently attended a working dog demonstration presented by airmen of the 97th Security Forces Squadron at USTRANSCOM headquarters.🐾🐕

#TogetherWeDeliver

https://x.com/US_TRANSCOM/status/1797659879382843423

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/20960555 (031619ZJUN24) Notable: @realDonaldTrump Biden Migrant Crime is out of control and is ravaging America! …

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

POTUS!

https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/112553579754674188

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/20960578 (031622ZJUN24) Notable: Fuck Fauci

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Again?

Look Democrats

KILLING 5People toSave ONE personIS BAD

That's not a Good Thing!

Are you people Insane in the membrane?!

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/20960606 (031629ZJUN24) Notable: Fuck Fauci

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Was Censored, Taken off the Internet

for Dissenting on treatment for Patient

Label "Anti-Science" by So called "Health Care Experts"

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/20960630 (031633ZJUN24) Notable: @realDonaldTrump HOME BUILDING COSTS HAMMERED BY INFLATION

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

POTUS!

https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/112553639109981101

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/20960637 (031634ZJUN24) Notable: Fuck Fauci

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Set up Field Tents and was Overwhelmed

But when the USS Comfy Hospital ship rolled in, There was only 1 person to treat

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/20960639 (031635ZJUN24) Notable: @realDonaldTrump Trump Support

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>168950

POTUS!

https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/112553649112305940

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/20960672 (031641ZJUN24) Notable: Buzz Kill: The Trump Conviction Presents a Target-Rich Environment for Appeal

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

COLUMNS, COURTS, CRIMINAL LAWJune 3, 2024

Buzz Kill: The Trump Conviction Presents a Target-Rich Environment for Appeal==1/2 or 3

(Yes Professor Turley used that picture!)

Below is my column in the Hill on the most compelling grounds for an appeal in the Trump case after his conviction on 34 counts in Manhattan. There has been considerable criticism of the defense team and its strategy in the case, including some moves that may undermine appellate issues. However,after the instructions became public, I wrote a column that I thought the case was nearly un-winnable, even for those of us who previously saw a chance for a hung jury. Clarence Darrow would likely have lost with those instructions after the errors in the case by Judge Juan Merchan. At that point, it became a legal canned hunt. So the attention will now shift to the appellate courts. While it may be tough going initially in the New York court system for the former president,this case could well end up in the federal system and the United States Supreme Court. The thrill kill environment of last week may then dissipate as theseglaring errorsare presented in higher courts.

Here is the column:

The conviction of former President Donald Trump in Manhattan of 34 felonies produced citywide celebrations. This thrill-kill environment extended to the media, where formerU.S. Attorney Harry Litman told MSNBC’s Nicolle Wallace that it was “majestic day” and “a day to celebrate.” When I left the courthouse after watching the verdict come in, I was floored by the celebrations outside by both the public and some of the media.

The celebrants would be wise to think twice before mounting this trophy kill on the political wall. The Trump trial is a target-rich environment for an appeal, with multiple layers of reversible error, in my view.

I am less convinced by suggestions that the case could be challenged on the inability of Trump receiving a fair trial in a district that voted roughly 90 percent against him.The problem was not the jury, but the prosecutors and the judge.

Some of the most compelling problems can bedivided into four groups.

The Judge

Acting Supreme Court justiceJuan Merchan was handpicked for this caserather than randomly selected. This is only the latest in a litany of Trump cases where Merchan has meted out tough rulings against Trump and his organization. With any other defendant, there would likely be outrage over his selection. Merchan donated to President Biden. Even though the state bar cleared that violation based on the small size of the contribution, it later stressed that no such contributions were appropriate for a judge. We learned later that Merchan has contributed to a group to stop the GOP and Trump. Merchan’s daughter is also a Democratic organizer who has helped raise millions against Trump and the GOP and for the Democrats.

To his credit, CNN legal analyst Elie Honighas previously said that this case was legally dubious, uniquely targeted Trump and could not succeed outside of an anti-Trump district. On the judge, he recently challenged critics on the fairness of assigning a Biden donor who has earmarked donations for “resisting the Republican Party and Donald Trump’s radical right-wing legacy.” He asked “Would folks have been just fine with the judge staying on the case if he had donated a couple bucks to “Re-elect Donald Trump, MAGA forever!”? “Absolutely not.”

What is equally disturbing is the failureof Merchan to protect the rights of the defendant and what even critics admit were distinctly pro-prosecution rulings in the trial. It is not just the appearance of a conflict withJudge Merchan but a record of highly biased decisions. In watching Merchan in the courtroom, I was shocked by his rulings as at times incomprehensible and conflicted.

The Charges

A leading threshold issue will be the decision to allow Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg to effectivelytry Trump for violations of federal law. The Justice Department declined any criminal charges against Trump under federal election law over the alleged “hush money” payments. The Federal Election Commission likewise found no basis for a civil fine. With no federal prosecution,Bragg decided to use an unprecedented criminal theorynot only to zap a dead misdemeanor into life (after the expiration of the statute of limitation) but to allow him to try violations of not only federal election law but also federal taxation violations. In other words, the Justice Department would not prosecute federal violations, so Bragg effectively did it in state court….

https://jonathanturley.org/2024/06/03/buzz-kill-the-trump-conviction-presents-a-target-rich-environment-for-appeal/

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/20960678 (031641ZJUN24) Notable: QClock June 03, 2024 - SEC Test, NYSE Technical Issue 99%

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

QClock June 03, 2024 - SEC Test, NYSE Technical Issue 99%

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/20960684 (031643ZJUN24) Notable: Buzz Kill: The Trump Conviction Presents a Target-Rich Environment for Appeal

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>168955

2/3

However, in a maddeningly circular theory, that other crime could be the falsification of business records. It could also be violations of federal election and taxation laws, which Trump was never charged with, let alone convicted of.

Even when closing arguments were given,analysts on various networks admitted that they were unclear about what Bragg was alleging. The indictment claimed a violation under New York’s election law 17-152 that the falsification of business records were committed to further another crime as an unlawful means to influence the election.

The Evidence

Judge Merchan allowed a torrent of immaterial and prejudicial evidenceto be introduced into the trial by the prosecution. That included testimony from porn actress Stormy Daniels that went into details about having sex with Trump. She included a clear suggestion that Trump raped her.After this utterly disgraceful testimony, Merchan expressed regret but actually blamed the defense counsel, despite their prior objections to the testimony. He had previously chastised counsel for making continued objections, but now he criticized them for not continuing to make objections.

Merchan was equally conflicted in his other orders.For example, he allowed the prosecutors to introduce the plea agreement of Michael Cohen to federal election violations as well as the non-prosecution agreement of David Pecker on such violations. However, it was allowed only for the purposes of credibility and context. He issued an instruction that the jury could not consider the plea or the agreement to establish or impute the guilt of Trump.

Theprosecutorsthen proceeded toexpressly state that it was “a fact” that federal election violationsoccurred in this case and that Trump ordered those violations. They also solicited such statements from witnesses like Cohen. Merchan overruled the objections that the prosecutors were eviscerating his instruction.Merchan also barred the use of a legal expert, former FEC Chair Brad Smith, who was prepared to testify that such payments cannot be viewed as federal election violations and would not affect the election even if they were considered contributions, since they would not even have had to be reported until after the election.

Merchan is likely to be upheld in denying the expert, since the court retains the authority to state what the law is to the jury.The problem is that Merchan failed to do so.Worse still, he allowed the jury to hear the opposite in the repeated false claim that these payments were campaign contributions.

The Instructions

Even with all of the reversible errors, some of us held out hope that there might be a hung jury.That hope was largely smashed by Merchan in his instructions to the jury.The court largely used standard instructions in a case that was anything but standard. However, the instruction also allowed for doubt as to what the jury would ultimately find.When the verdict came in, we were still unsure what Trump was convicted of.

Merchan allowed the jury to find that the secondary offense was any ofthe three vaguely defined options. Even on the jury form, they did not have to specify which of the crimes were found. Under Merchan’s instruction, the jury could have split 4-4-4 on what occurred in the case. They could have seen a conspiracy to conceal a federal election violation, falsification of business records or taxation violations.We will never know. Worse yet, Trump will never know.…

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/20960692 (031644ZJUN24) Notable: Buzz Kill: The Trump Conviction Presents a Target-Rich Environment for Appeal

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>168957

3/3

The Supreme Court has repeatedly emphasized that therequirement of unanimity in criminal convictions is sacrosanct in our system. While there was unanimity that the business records were falsified to hide or further a second crime, there wasno express finding of what that crime may have been. In some ways, Trump may have been fortunate by Merchan’s cavalier approach. Given that the jury convicted Trump across the board, they might have found all of three secondary crimes. Theverdict form never asked for such specificity.

These are just a few of the appellate issues. There are other challenges, including but not limited to due process violations on the lack of specificity in the indictment, vagueness of the underlying state law and the lack of evidentiary foundation for key defenses like “the legitimate press function.” They are the reason why many of us view this case is likely to be reversed in either the state or federal systems. ==None of that is likely to dampen the thrill in this kill in Manhattan.

But if Biden wins the election before this conviction is overturned, history’s judgment will be deafening.

https://jonathanturley.org/2024/06/03/buzz-kill-the-trump-conviction-presents-a-target-rich-environment-for-appeal/

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/20960758 (031658ZJUN24) Notable: The Delaware people, places part of Hunter Biden's trial

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Janssen's, StarQuest Shooters and more: The Delaware people, places part of Hunter Biden's trial

In a downtown Wilmington courthouse Monday, Hunter Biden is set to become the first child of a sitting U.S. president to face a criminal trial.

The evidence against him will include testimony about how the gun at the center the case ended up in a trash can outside Janssen's Market, an upscale grocer in Delaware's monied Greenville area. The proceeding will include testimony by a former Delaware State Police official who investigated that incident, as well as the person who trashed the gun: Biden's then-lover and widow of his late brother.

It will also include testimony from workers from a gun store on U.S. 202 in Talleyville, a shop that now finds itself at the center of criticisms by Hunter Biden's defense attorneys for seemingly committing a similar paperwork infraction that led to Biden's criminal charges.

It all started with an odd incident involving Hunter Biden and Hallie Biden at Janssen's in October 2018, an incident that would escape the public eye for years.

https://www.delawareonline.com/story/news/local/2024/06/02/hunter-biden-gun-trial-delaware-janssens-state-police-hallie-biden/73894393007/

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/20960769 (031701ZJUN24) Notable: The Delaware people, places part of Hunter Biden's trial

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Hunter Biden gun trial live updates: The quest for impartiality as jury selection begins

Court churns through potential jurors

Two hours into jury selection, a handful of potential jurors have been dismissed over concerns about their impartiality.

One was dismissed after expressing that his opinions on rights around gun ownership may color his view of the law and evidence. Another noted his father was a police officer for 30 years and his grandfather worked for the FBI. He told the judge he felt he could not be impartial because of this.

One person told the court she read stories from when Joe Biden was running for president and the stories involved Hunter Biden.

“I don’t know if I can be impartial from previous opinions about things I’ve heard,” the person told the court.

Prosecutors pressed her on what that opinion was.

“Not a good one, sorry,” she responded and was dismissed.

https://www.delawareonline.com/story/news/politics/2024/06/03/hunter-biden-gun-trial-2024-wilmington-delaware-jury-selection/73922389007/

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/20960826 (031714ZJUN24) Notable: Fuck Fauci

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

https://x.com/vigilantfox/status/1797661236231803020?s=46&t=bnsBEtaYeMmQ4vtvK1QA_A

Dr. Fauci breaks down into tears discussing personal death threats

*image from video from X link. Notice Fauci gets trolled in the background?

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/20960829 (031715ZJUN24) Notable: They are trying to fool you into thinking it was someone from the far-right rally

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Reason #666,666,666 why fake new enemy of the people media is DYING.

This is despicable.

The headline ignores the fact that an Afghan Muslim did the stabbing. They are trying to fool you into thinking it was someone from the far-right rally.

They are trying to fool you into thinking it was someone from the far-right rally.

https://twitter.com/WallStreetSilv/status/1797617175982981599

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/20960878 (031727ZJUN24) Notable: The Delaware people, places part of Hunter Biden's trial

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

https://www.the-express.com/news/politics/139375/hunter-biden-jill-biden-texts-rehab-addiction-gun-trial

Hunter Biden called stepmom Jill a 'vindictive moron' and 'entitled c—' in vicious texts

Hunter Biden called his stepmom Jill Biden a "vindictive moron" and "entitled c—" in a series of text messages after she urged him to go to rehab to deal with his rampant drug addiction.

The 54-year-old troubled son of Joe Biden allegedly launched the venomous tirade against his stepmother after she encouraged him to seek help for his well-documented substance abuse problems.

In a particular exchange with his late brother Beau's widow, Hallie Biden, who was in a controversial romantic relationship with Hunter at the time, Hunter does not mince words about the now-incumbent First Lady.

"F— my stepmother for always being as much of a selfish silly entitled ct as you," he vented to Hallie amidst the breakup of their brief relationship.

He confessed to bulking out another insult-laden text to his uncle, James Biden, referring to Dr. Jill Biden as a "f—ing moron, a vindictive moron".

Further probing text exchanges with his uncle revealed Hunter bragging that he was intellectually superior to his stepmother.

"And you do know the drunkest I've ever been is still smarter than you could ever even comprehend and you're a shut grammar teacher that wouldn't survive one class in a Ivy graduate program," he wrote.

"So go f— yourself Jill let's all agree I don't like you anymore than you like me."

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/20960905 (031736ZJUN24) Notable: Baker change

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>>/qresearch/20960889

>>>/qresearch/20960896

...OK, cool. Drop what you got.confirm handoff