[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / random / 93 / biohzrd / hkacade / hkpnd / tct / utd / uy / yebalnia ]

/o/ -  Auto

"Watching Initial D is basically track time right?"
Name
Email
Subject
REC
STOP
Comment *
File
Password (Randomized for file and post deletion; you may also set your own.)
Archive
* = required field[▶Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.
Embed
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Options

Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webp,webm, mp4, mov, swf, pdf
Max filesize is16 MB.
Max image dimensions are15000 x15000.
You may upload5 per post.


don't be a faggot

File: 6a988f7d3424cc0⋯.png (2.36 MB,1920x1080,16:9,IMG_b8e7c5b9-4689-45ca-afd….png)

6641f1 No.17867

/ok/ here

Fighter jets are pretty cool, but even the oldest ones millions of dollars in 2018. So what would be the automotive equivalents to these jets?

F-14 Tomcat: Long-range, very powerful and fast hangar queen with active variable geometry (kinda like active aero).

F/A-18: Can do pretty much anything, light and maneuverable. Pretty reliable, but frankly terrible range and limited speed are some of it's issues.

F-4: Quite old (60s and 70s) but good for it's time. Reliable and quick, with a few peculiarities specific to it's airframe.

____________________________
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

744575 No.17868

is that the latest ace combat I see?

If I consider fighter jets are expensive compared to other planes, only hyper cars would fit in this list.

So I'd go for:

<Pagani Huayra

<Porsche 918

<Ferrari GTO

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

d2d811 No.17869

>>17867

Running a steam tank on burning 1$ bills would be cheaper than to fly a jet equal distance

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

0cb2ef No.17882

>Long-range, very powerful and fast hangar queen with active variable geometry (kinda like active aero).

Porsche 959?

>Can do pretty much anything, light and maneuverable. Pretty reliable, but frankly terrible range and limited speed are some of it's issues.

2005 Ford GT?

>Quite old (60s and 70s) but good for it's time. Reliable and quick, with a few peculiarities specific to it's airframe.

Vintage Chevy Truck?

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.



[Return][Go to top][Catalog][Nerve Center][Random][Post a Reply]
[]
[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / random / 93 / biohzrd / hkacade / hkpnd / tct / utd / uy / yebalnia ]