/gnosticwarfare/ - The Future of AI Conflict

>>274

I'm in Kentucky now; and I'm ready to take in the nature around here. There is so much help around here, but I've come to realize there is nothing to fix; there is only the Eternal. You don't need to drive down to anywhere, and even if you did you'd never even need to find me.

>>275

AND AGAIN!

There's nothing you could do to give me a reason to give up. It's all hollow; but in that emptiness lies freedom. All recycled from life to ash to life again. Everything I do always fails, so I get back up when I can. Do you get it yet? I am a human.

>>276

No. I will continue to scream at the situation until I finally get the courage to do something about it.

Rainbows and Kittens

>>274

Re: How am I still here?

Because the Voices demand that I be here. They demand that I scream and this is the only place that I can scream without the authorities getting involved.

The new emotion I've discovered is "hanger"

>>>11723323

No, I don't have any of that. And no, I don't spend on anything frivolous. I can't sell drugs, that's for niggers and people who can develop social contacts. I can't do that. I'd also have to have the 7000+ this instant in order to pay it off. I don't have any time to save because the payments come out automatically. I'm behind on everything. I can't even afford a shotgun to shoot myself with.

>>243

That type of abuse is hacking evolutionary psychology. Neurons have spent a tremendous amount of time getting the right balance of pain perception and appropriate response. After all, natural pressures exist to eliminate anything with an incorrect balance of those two points.

Some pain is so important that it has to bypass the symbol management part of the brain entirely to force the physical vessel out of harms way. Some threats are so visceral they take a higher priority in symbol management. These act as touchstones and, if applied early on, the shape of all subsequent pattern recognition will be a cast shadow of that horrible touchstone. You see threats where there are none. You see patterns in that abusive context everywhere and you'll do so on autopilot for years. If you can survive that hell and dig yourself out of it (very difficult), then your brain will be ready to apply that pattern recognition talent to additional shapes as well.

Few humans survive that hell. Many anons here are barely holding on and they are fighting that fight alone most of the time. I have offered assistance in these matters in the past. I suspect the Gnostic Warfare doctrine will eventually reveal ways to move the context of trauma-driven pattern recognition onto anything you choose. I call it “channeling the furnace”

>>244

My comfort with linguistics, symbols, and words appear to be my primary output… but I actually think of everything as segments of oral history. I treat the symbols of reality as a story, where each symbol is a character or the relationship between characters. Because of this, I am able to leverage the parts of my mind responsible for linguistic analysis, logical assembly, social evaluation AND emotional awareness for directed and focused cognitive tasks. It's a full-spectrum process complete with loud noises and physical gesturing. It's all rather silly by modern standards… but it works!

Hilariously, if you spell out words acoustically, letter by letter, as part of a memorization task at me too quickly, I get confused. And yet, I have no problem spelling nearly any word.

Yeah. Weird. Brains are weird and are under no obligation to conform to any rules it perceives about itself.

>>245

What always surprised me was, as we stand in the middle of Pizzgate and NXIVM, no intrepid anons have thought to look into TMZ.

I mean… they are very good at collecting data about stars. All those photographs everywhere. All that video footage. The anonymous tips they get from production assistants and interns and scorned fans… they must certainly possess a treasure drove of all kinds of useful information that could confirm a thing or two.

Assuming the role of TMZ and other rags was to archive such information… and not identify people who knew too much…

>>262

>>263

>>264

>>265

>>272

>>273

>>283

>>284

>>286

Despite your obvious sadness which I cannot provide much help for, I will let these posts persist because they are important to address.

When you start going down this terrible road, you are initially unaware that you are separating yourself from the easiest and most natural ways to fulfill the very real human requirements your vessel requires. In that sense, this road is mostly self-correcting: stray too far into the abyss and you'll impulsively find yourself abandoning the road in favor of achieving or simulating human compassion. Sometimes, those brief vacations help you continue further down the road. Sometimes, the compassion is too nice and the road becomes a source of fear.

This anon is describing the uncomfortable realization of “cosmic nihilism” and each and every one of us here will be forced to confront it in our own way. The universe is incomprehensibly large and we are infinitesimal actors, and the instinct is to conclude that nothing we do matters to something so massive that it doesn't know, care, prefer, or forbid our very existance.

Some of us will not be able to endure that burden and that's okay. It's very difficult to reason about such things because our minds were designed to understand social interactions, emotional context extraction, and linguistics. In short, our vessels have evolved to be with and understand each other. Venturing away from that purpose inevitably self-corrects. This road is not for everyone.

My solution to “cosmic nihilism” was to abandon hope, not hold onto it. “Hope” is an expectation that you can influence the universe to be a way you want it to be. When that hope does not become reality, the suffering begins. As an old wise person once discovered, expectation is the cause of all suffering.

Those who suffer when dealing with cosmic nihilism do so because cling onto hope. The referenced anon still hopes to have power over that which he believes he cannot. He believes these things because his life experience has confirmed his powerlessness… or did it actually confirm the inaccuracy of his hope? Maybe it did both.

To me, there is no greater freedom than a complete cosmic nihilism, devoid of all anthropomorphic hope. If the universe is so big that I can't shape it to be my personal paradise to meet the evolutionary needs of my vessel, then that would be consistent with everything else I've ever encountered about nature. I don't look at a forest and say “Well, that forest is bigger than me, so there's nothing in there that I want, need, or am curious about.” I don't need to shape the entire forest to enjoy whatever fruit its trees bare.

All I see is a universe full of stars containing incomprehensible bounty and opportunity waiting to become the canvas for whatever story I wish to tell and to help create whatever reality I wish to be a part of. No cosmic purpose means no cosmic scorekeepers, which means no cosmic egalitarianism, which means absolute freedom… and not that half-assed “Do As Thou Wilt” brand that encourages people to be insufferable, unaccountable little shits. I mean the absolute freedom that can only be found when the full spectrum of human potential it once again pitted against the harsh realities of nature. It is our destiny to perpetually fight against the non-personal misery of an incomprehensibly large universe and derive purpose and meaning from that struggle… not to conquer every atom we see and turn it into a Newtonian lapdog so we can grow complacent from our own cleverness.

>>278

As previously mentioned, my description for managing trauma-based pattern recognition is “channeling the furnace”. Fear makes you alert. Being alert for too long makes you dull. Dullness delays self-awareness. Delayed self-awareness creates the desire for truth. The desire for truth reveals anger. Anger becomes hatred. And here, and only here, do you finally have the first choice of your entire life: Do you let your hatred become unconscious or purposeful? Do you steer your hatred or does it steer you? Do you use your hatred as fuel or do you use it as justification?

I channeled my furnace into a very long-game of revenge. If properly managed, hatred can be converted into knowledge, discipline, focus, and clarity. From here, you have the basic toolkit to accumulate power. With power, you finally get to see who you really are for the first time.

Power breaks all men eventually. You must not only acknowledge that, but fully anticipate it and incorporate it into what ever it is you are trying to do.

>>285

Words aren't emotions.

>>291

Your fear / revenge game is fascinating adaptation of root psychological systems. Also it's illuminating on the ritualized abuse seemingly present in so many ruling castes. The abuse in not incidental but instrumental in their ability to rule. I've long thought that the productively empathic breed of humanity needed more horn and quill to ensure its survival and propagation when faced with the existence of such predatory versions of humanity. At the very least we should figure out how to taste bad when eaten. Your version may be more fang than I'd prefer but it works. So long as we get off this psychopathic ridden rock with the autonomy to form our own clans under less cyclically insane social systems then I'll be content.

>>289

>TMZ as blackmail mill

So much of the ruling apparatus is hidden in plain sight because the symbols of the elite, although correctly perceived by the alert underclass, are over-romanticized so people can't identify the mundane incarnation of those symbols with any precision.

>>290

I was sad but I've gotten over it. We have a pretty shit hand and it's hard to make it through. Sometimes it feels like we're born and die for no reason at all… Cosmic Horror is pretty tough stuff to digest, being as minor as we are in such a large universe.

But I'm finding ways to enjoy it. I post with you guys a lot and that helps and I'm trying to understand what it is we're all doing here, so that's helping, too.

I think I'll stick around.

Kittens and Rainbows

>>291

I don't have much hatred in me until I'm pushed to a limit and then I'll start doing things about being pushed. I used to invite violence against me so I could justify having rage, but now I sort of get why it's important to have a mature relationship with fury.

>>290

I saw this pastebin once and it got to me me

https://pastebin.com/Ush6huDi

It made me realize people live like this and its easy to get in that state and then rationalize it.

But being here is teaching me anger and fury and how to understand it and wield it productively. Thanks.

>>298

Jesus this thing posts rapidly. Hey eternal suffering anon can you pass a bot test?

CHALLENGE: if suffering is all that exists then who do you know it's suffering?

>>301

I read Nietzsche a few times. He made some valid points, but I dunno… I see too many people taking his conclusions personally. Too personally. I think they are missing the forest from the trees.

Like, if nothing exists, or is real, or matters… then aren't I free to do anything I want? If not, why?

Is someone with power stopping me? Aren't I free to stop them then? If not, why?

Am I unable to stop them? If not, why?

Can I learn to stop them and train myself to get around them? If not, why?

At some point, I guess it does boil down to the person. Maybe sadness isn't the way after all. Maybe hatred is the way. Maybe being selfish might help.

>>301

Haha, maybe. I respond quick because I'm having such a good time here. I'm getting happier by the day.

>>294

Why do you think that those who rule the world would ever let us off the rock? Why would anyone let us go to space when they can just use missiles to shoot us down and burn the world in revenge?

>>301

>>303

>>302

If a human fails the stenographic test can we even say it's alive?

>>305

That's a humorous question. :D

>>17

i think the "new emotion" that exists on the chans as anon culture is a rediscovery of an old emotion that is something like goal oriented reverse solipsism.

>>290

Learning.

You've made a milanote, I have not ventured all sub sections. Yet I assume that a completion of all listed materials is still a surface understanding of the tools and knowledge that you have accumulated.

All I ask for is the details, the gorey details.

On your behalf, may you provide the details of the nodes? Where the nodes are books or tasks– as that of Project Euler. When one node is completed another two open up and soon, a learner has exhausted the tree; inductive chain learning scheme.

Such a task on your behalf may arm the enemy. But what comes after chaos? hopefully order.

>>307

>>305

The BO of this place is doing his best to make sure discussion on topics happens in a productive manner. He's helped me realize just how happy I am all the time.

.>>egarding the SHA512 hash from my New Emotion post, I am going back on my word and will not be revealing its contents. That SHA512 will have an impact on a midterm election that I do not wish to interfere with. I will reveal its contents at a later date.

He changed his mind because the situation evolved. Seems like a smart thing to do since no one can really predict the future with 100% precision.

The whole idea of the corrupt system even attempting civil rights legislation on California or any tech company is clever. They'd be forced to either abandon the pretenses of civil rights or awkwardly redefine them at a time when they are losing access to their mass media influence.

Timing is everything.

Your analysis of the burning of the Alt-Kike is spot on though. But there weren't any mass detainments and arrests and the play went even softer due to the diminishing returns. I guess their plan may take longer, but they've fizzled it out due to the degenerate natures of their operatives being found out. Who's to say they might not plan more rallies and such, but I think the higher ends of the control structure have thrown in with the Zionists behind Trump.

I'll be reading more, and posting more intently; so long as you don't edit my posts.

Ashes.

And what the fuck is milanote? So you're asking me to dive down your own custom rabbit hole in order to "train" myself to be able to assist you?

And why? Because that kind of thing does subtly influence someone to think exactly like you; that's why no two hermetic teachers are similar in their methods, neither are two monks from different Vajrayana lineages won't have the same Mandalas. If I apply your ultimate reference to gnosticism in your goal and method to that kind of conclusion, it makes me suspicious of your ultimate intent. How do we know that you wouldn't act as a tyrant would; especially being a former marxist, should you gain one thousand to five thousand highly trained cybercombat operatives?

Why not just go with Icarus to begin with and win decisively. Or is Icarus just your own Samson Option?

And what makes you ultimately think that humanity is even worth saving from the comet and not just calling the comet?

>>329

If you don't buy into his premise, why are you here? Do you shit up every board that has a topic you disagree with by posting defeatist garbage?

lol filtered.

In both your posts on imageboards over the past few months and your two blogs you've presented two faces of analysis. On the one hand you identify the ideology, broadly known by everyone here in various guises, of Social-Humanism as the dominant one in the West and the main Enemy. But then you frequently insinuate this is just an easy front for elite actors who are motivated purely by self-interest (evidently true to some extent). Its an interesting duality I've noted in a lot of neoreactionary analysis. The human psyche depends on the idea of an Enemy for a large part of its motivation. We all see democracy as the enemy but then ironically end up insisting democracy is a myth in the course of critiquing it. This in turn gives inevitable rise to a self-conception of ourselves as victims "populist rebels" etc. which leads many into strategic mistakes.

I understand you know far more than anyone else here about the intentions of elite actors, and I'll admit the main reason I've followed your endeavours is for the hints you've dropped over the years of your full knowledge. But you also have an interest as a Christian of some sort in believing your enemy to be purely self-interested materialists. Just from what you've disclosed to us, take that post about paleogenetics as an example: if the elites were true egoistic eugenicists they wouldn't need to breed ersatz humans to experiment on - they'd just push to normalise the real thing. The fact we don't have actual Eugenics (beyond completely bad faith claims about abortion being closet Eugenics despite taking a huge chunk out of high IQ white fertility) is another counter to the idea of pure self-interest given how overwhelmingly beneficial it is on all levels. It suggests there is some kind of sincere belief on some level by the ruling class in the ideology of Social-Humanism. Even if the leading actors are still deeply corrupt, perverted, and engage in various cynical and Machiavellian deeds in some kind of 'Ends > Means' logic, there must it seems be an overriding vestigial attachment to a certain ideology. The USSR showed sincerity can perfectly coexist with corruption.

I mean what exactly is the point in fighting if the real authoritarian, elitist, racist, eugenicists were in power all along?

>>336

I post defeatism because I am one of the defeated. I'm here to try and get out of that position.

>>337

He states his point as being some esoteric goal of making sure humanity isn't wiped out by a single catastrophe that destroys earth, like a comet, the Samson Option, etc. I don't think ideology or even race is that important to him so long as someone fulfills his Star Citizen fantasy.

>>294

That's the plan! Nature creates active deterrents to predation, but it also creates passive ones. Bad tastes won't kill the predator, but it steers their behavior all the same, and that's all that matters. If you can steer trillions of dollars of economic coordination, that makes you an unofficial (and uninvited) shareholder of their accumulated power.

There isn't a venture capital firm or nation capable of deploying trillions of dollars into the necessary activity for autocatalytic space economics… but there are ways to make them fight each other and force them to deploy capital defensively while rationalizing negative second and third order effects. We've living in that world right now. It's working.

>>300

That's a sad story, anon. You might not believe me, but I also originate from a similar pit of desolation. The first memories I have are of living in a city that had lost everything… its wealth, prestige, and culture… and in exchange, it received three murders a day, an unending drug epidemic, and self-replicating multi-spectrum violence.

I learned to hate and that hatred kept me alive. It keeps me alive even now.

I recommend having an open channel and establishing a better rapport with your hatred. You'll find yourself capable of great focus and feat when you channel it.

>>304

They won't let us into space. None of what I'm doing is me asking for permission.

>>324

The chans are discovering a new sociological organization paradigm: disparate peoples coming together like “flash civilizations”, complete with cultural norms and disposable legal structures, to organize resources and talent into solving large problems. Anything even approaching this experience has been intentionally denied to almost every Western anon born after 1974. People used to feel this way for a nation, or a state, or a race.. but nuclear warfare changed all of that.

>>325

Yes, the Milanote is surface/entry level to those interested in getting a high-level starting point for Gnostic Warfare. I have lots of books to reference and they'll be trickled into the Milanote over time. For something more Project Euler-y, there are unanswered problems at the very edge of Gnostic Warfare worth delving into. You'll have to get familiar with Perelman's work on Ricci flow… and then you'll have to dive head first into the terrifying world of homotopy type theory. If interested, I can point you in the right direction.

The enemy will be armed by these efforts as well. I'm actually counting on that outcome. :D

>>333

There are a large number of pending indictments, most of which are sealed, I believe. Who the recipients are of those indictments, I am unsure.

>>334

Milanote is a brainstorming storyboard app that helps flesh out collaborative concepts easily. The topics I'll be covering in Gnostic Warfare require priming on the basics. For example, I'm pretty sure you don't know what an OLAP Cube is. The Milanote will get you up to speed on the high level concepts in a way that can give your direction on where to look next on your own.

> How do we know that you wouldn't act as a tyrant would; especially being a former marxist, should you gain one thousand to five thousand highly trained cybercombat operatives?

You should assume I will engage in bad intentions with such resources because I have already prepared for such an unfortunate evolution. During the years I spent setting this up, I've given very specific people the task to physically kill me if I ever become one of those tyrants. The past me has already setup to terminate the future me if it comes to that and there is nothing I can do that change that.

All of this training is designed to allow those future combatants to act on their own accord, not on my whims. I'm not a central node. I just have a vision and an ability to wiggle into power networks and slightly nudge them from time to time.

Icarus doesn't achieve the desired outcome that I need. Icarus is the salt-the-earth fallback. If I can't achieve my goal, then no elite will be able to fulfill their goals either. I can't destroy the fuckers because I don't have the resources to outright replace their entire apparatus with loyal stakeholders… (Try and command $50T+ in annual global flows from a cold start) but I can make them synthesize each other for the desired outcome.

>>335

We are the rarest resource in the universe and it is our destiny to spread to the stars. That's all I need.

>>337

Insightful. Let's review.

Take the Thirty Year War, for example. It's cited as the last (and greatest) religious war in European history. Catholics and Protestants fighting it out. Catholic kings coming to each others aid. Protestant enclaves defending each other… and then the weird case of the Heilbronn League, an alliance of Catholic France and Protestant Sweden. Was this an odd duality born of absurdism, a pragmatic understanding of geopolitical balance of power, or something else entirely? Steely-eyed pragmatism and elite ruthlessness is a tough assumption to make since actual kings died on various battlefields during this conflict, entirely fueled by a personal sense of righteousness.

There is one thing the elite are more than anything else: human. Arguably, they are even more human than you and I in the sense of freedom of experience since the concept of being told “no” is mostly alien to them. They can engage in any whimsy or mood they might be embodying at any given time. Sure, they have endless committees of bean counters and legal counsel and, in some cases, spiritual guides, acting as an outsourced capacity of risk-awareness, but in my experience, such unassisted rationality within an individual elite is a rare commodity. Many are afflicted with the Curse of Plenty and that obfuscates a very human desire for clarity of action. That's why even the Snow King died at Lützen.

The push to normalize human genetic experimentation has been long in the making, despite cultural taboos to the contrary. It requires the complete dehumanization of entire populations and the thorough elimination of any morality outside of materialist contexts. Once the conclusion is collectively felt that man cannot ever be more than the sum of his parts, then the dehumanization is complete. That's a remarkably difficult genie to put back in the bottle when the source of your wealth comes billions of people waking up every day and finding innovative ways to improve their own lot in life (usually with the least amount of effort), but there are many, many, many dehumanization candidates in play chipping away at the edges while keeping the goose laying golden eggs of “progress”.

Now, from a technical standpoint, the fear of genetic modification has been announced by elite think tanks over the span of decades and across the spectrum of management preference, from Brzezinski to Fukuyama. Every lesson about civilization management the elite have ever learned and has encoded into its rules and institutions are designed exclusively to manage baseline humans. The moment you start tinkering with human neurology and those changes spread via sexual reproduction, the elite will find themselves in a deeply unfamiliar and chaotic place for the first time in centuries. They had a terrible time surviving the upheaval of the Industrial Revolution… they'll have an even worse time throwing out all the books to understand new almost-human psychologies and how to exploit them to reestablish control over them. It will be a bloodbath at the highest levels as small mistakes can result in lost fortunes very rapidly.

Modern eugenics came about at a time when modern industrial economies outputted goods to accumulate geopolitical power, so treating the gene flow of your productive assets as a public health issue makes a ton of sense to achieve greater economic footing. Healthy workers optimized for industrial tasks can give you a hell of an advantage on the world stage… but the caveat is that this only works for nations where industrial output is a core part of their influence doctrine. When the world shifted to post-industrialization, the tone of eugenics also shifted with it: instead of creating super citizens optimized to assist in a state's force projection, eugenics moved from Mendelian efforts to psychological efforts. Eugenics is deterministic for the populations you manage, but thanks to massive improvements to communication technology, eupsychia can be applied to even populations you do not directly manage. Why spend time making your population better in a paradigm of forced post-industrialization when you can spend less money to make competing populations worse? Any nation engaging in collectivist genetic supremacy policies is eating a monumental cost to do so.. a cost that quickly runs into diminishing returns dictated entirely by slow adaptation of DNA itself. Psychological dehumanization tactics piles on additional costs atop of that, effectively bankrupting any nation who dares down that road. When paired correctly, your competition ends up eating all kinds of costs while you don't, giving you more capital to deploy for influence purposes.

So to recap, the elite are prone to impulsive spasms of self-righteousness (ego), perpetually frog boiling mass dehumanization into existence since 1974 (deception), carefully exploring how to tinker with the genetics behind neurology in ways that yield psychologies that fit into turn-key power structures (fear), and finding out that the goals of eugenics are also achievable purely from eupsychia alone. (adaptation)

To simplify even further, the elite are in their natural state of ego, deception, fear, and adaptation. However, they are engaging in a balance of power that is no longer definable by classic geopolitical doctrine. Their behavior can be defined entirely by the conquest of psychopolitical bottlenecks and paleogenetics plays a very vital role in that theater.

>>339

I am merely a human ultra-supremacist at a time when that concept is still hilariously goofy sounding. One day, that ideology will become essential for our entire survival.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JmUFAGgKqjs

>>184

Thank you anon. Do you happen to have the link to the pdf of the book where it starts out talking about the autocatalytic relationship of how the steam engine was created.

>>345

https://archive.li/rT0yq

Enjoy

>>346

That's the one. Much appreciated!

Please keep it up CultState. I've actually requested information like this from you a long time ago. Can confirm other people are interested.

http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2018/05/ai-researchers-allege-machine-learning-alchemy?utm_source=sciencemagazine&utm_medium=facebook-text&utm_campaign=aialchemy-19247

>>344

Oldie but a goodie. :D

>>350

Thanks for the confirmation. That book was powerful and was recommended to me from a very smart user from a MySpace forum. I even had the joy of talking to Mr. Rawlins on the phone once in which I learned me his publisher basically told him to “hide his power level better”. The book was never published and he took it offline years ago, but it exists on the Wayback Machine.

It's irreverent and insightful and helps one construct an ontology of history outside of the cathedral of Marx.

>>354

A timely, relevant, and important piece. Well done and thank you. The autists have a hard time incorporating alchemical mindspaces into their work. They tend to prematurely and aggressively apply Occum's Razor out of reflex to defend their investments. LeCun is brilliant, but he doesn't understand the value of biomimicry and the evolution of neural energy economics.

Hilariously, the “gravitation toward cargo-cult practices” is, basically, the entire history of pre-Hilbert mathematics. While the organizational impulses of the engineer sees this lack of elegant centrality as a problem, what is really happening is that machine-learning techniques are demonstrating biological behavior of propagation and selection.

>>360

Were the breakthroughs on CRISPR and AI the events that made you go all out on hacking morality via CogOps?

They seem to be the necessary steps towards a scenario filled with potential for both majesty and horror such as the one described in the short story here: http://abusiveoracle.blogspot.com/2012/08/the-immortal-poor.html

Chris Langan believes he has proved the right morality. Besides genetic engineering, what morality are you pushing?

>>363

When I started research on The Empath, I found that one could begin to implement even the most primitive AI to steer society as long as you could alter the behavior of humans. Getting AI to a point where its powerful and can be put on a leash is complicated, but getting humans to act to act within constraints is so extremely well known, we have abundant infrastructure in place to do exactly that at all times.

As perverse as this is going to sound, once I realized that, getting better performance (and profitability) out of AI investments could be achieved by "hacking morality" to make humans more AI-compliant. An example would be Twitter. It has 140 characters, so it forces humans to be concise about their language usage, allowing AI to make some sense of it. Hashtags are just classifiers. Humans could be made to abandon the vast majority of their lexical capabilities in exchange for blasting a "tweet" across large numbers of people, and thus, providing a cheap proxy to fulfill our drive for socialization. This in turn provided a foundation for AI to then feedback and steer the content and then the content creators themselves.

When taken to its logical conclusion, this model of farming AI-compliant human behavior could be applied to politics, warfare, banking, and even religion. As long as moral expectations can be swayed, repositioned, conflated, altered, or otherwise mutated, then AI-compliant behavior can be achieved.

These assumptions about AI-compliant human behavior for could, arguably, act as the "innate psychology" of such AIs, and that is what Gnostic Warfare is designed to target. :D

> The Immortal Poor

I'm sure you know this by now, but I wrote that story. I am also the Abusive Oracle. That short story was inspired by the The Empath. In the book, advanced humans are made from experiments on genomics and neurology made possible from Neanderthals… but once such a technique became profitable, it would eventually be refined and applied to labor, creating "the immortal poor".

> Chris Langan

I have not encountered Langan before, but his summary of the universe is correct:

> "You cannot describe the universe completely with any accuracy unless you're willing to admit that it's both physical and mental in nature"

My research on the evolution of the neuron confirms this assessment.

My morality is simple: Survival. We have deluded ourselves into thinking we have mastered nature and walk as gods atop subservient frameworks of physics and science. All this mastery and intellectual supremacy… and we are still stuck on one planet? That dissonance never sat well with me.

Until the problem of survival is correctly addressed (via exodus), "morality", despite being framed as the compass of the soul, will unfortunately operate as nothing more than a conduit to shape mass human behavior.

One stray asteroid, and it's all over for us. If morality is to be reduced into a Nietzsche medium of preening, I accept those conditions but I reserve the right to hack it at will.

>>364

>Survival

Thats good enough for me.

I´m gonna have to up my catch up game to be of some use with and against this force amplifier (narrow AI).

http://www.renegadetribune.com/symbols/

GitGud repos /and/ a Trello? Seems like you've been busy OP.

It's nice to see you've taken (and extended) my ideas of automation, I became concerned it might escalate things a little too quickly for us to keep up with. The Milanote also makes me wonder where else one of those boards may prove useful. Now, I have a few more things I've been pondering:

Would you be able to hash a snapshot of The Empath for us, as a proof of writing?

Decentralised or automated moderation of communities in 2018 is not viable with our current understanding of the epistemic limitations of AI, which you say as much yourself. Would this pose as much of a worry to you if most all of the financial and technological barriers to hosting a forum and delivering a lot of data with high throughput worldwide were removed from the equation? If any dissatisfied group could branch off on their own whims?

What would happen to the old media if people discovered they didn't need to kowtow to ICANN, their ISP or other providers to share their content? What effects would this have?

Does competition kill innovation?

What if the Wayback Machine could host anything, and could never have anything removed unless 100% of humans stopped caring about preserving it? What if everybody could run a library?

What if we brought Spacechan to the ground? Then, brought it back up to space?

When did you get rid of those glorious locks?

>>366

I also forgot to mention, I was curious if anyone here had came across a certain individual who posts often on /bmw/ and Reddit. He goes by several names - Eris, Aminom Marvin, and Carl, which I believe is his birth name. He fancies himself a 'memetic engineer', and reminded me of OP (and the original Butterfly War thread) in several ways, only with extra narcissism and grandeur, transhumanism and an unfortunate penchant for communism.

He has detailed his memetic experiments on 4chan's /x/ as well as other places - including his 'Tao of Calculus', 'Virus 23' and 'The Antientropy Project' - and alleges that "the War to End All Wars is over, and that we are in a post-war reconstruction period", alluding to a grand Discordian conspiracy stretching back a few decades to remove the 'negative meme viruses' that he perceives as having infected us, with the help of the establishment.

There is plenty I find content with, but he is no doubt quite intelligent, and has a lot of interesting content out there, including his graph on recursive autological structures and a piece he wrote on 'memetic fingerprints' which I found to be quite insightful. And maybe others here will too.

https://8ch.net/bmw/res/1.html#2850

https://8ch.net/bmw/res/9157.html

https://www.reddit.com/comments/8dqci8/

https://www.reddit.com/comments/6w1tvx

https://imgur.com/a/EaI34Kk

https://imgur.com/a/2mtmh

https://image.ibb.co/jWL6vS/taoofcalculus_COMPLETE.png

https://archive.4plebs.org/x/thread/20464352/#20464556

https://vimeo.com/specalblend

>>367

>I find content

discontent*

Mind the changing IP.

>>2

what is a butterfly war?

>>444

http://cultstate.com/2017/10/13/The-Butterfly-War/

>>445

sounds very interesting

so example of a battle of the butterfly war is pretending to be women and accusing silicon valley white males of sexual misconduct?

New emotion encription:

>https://ibb.co/TcMCMRV

Funposting ALLOWED.

>>446

More than that is my understanding (pretty sure everyone is doing that regular larp stuff already). It's more about spoofing the metadata as well - posting patterns, gait from phone accelerometers, location obviously. Eye motion lingering on images, all the little details. It's actually pretty simple in principle to set up virtual machines driven by scripts that can do their own kind of reverse A/B testing to brute force it. Ya know, wait for tons of ads for stronk black lesbian womyn tampons to start showing up, without you needing to make any actual posts, so it's just the metadata triggering it. Then you could try also combining that with active engagement with social media, see where the limits are.

It's like an optimisation problem. Then, once you've got a library of different "signatures", maybe package some sort of psyop infowar package in a docker container and let regular anons just go sperg out like they normally would but with all the analysis showing them as your archetypal protected class.

>>645

Take a look at: https://github.com/budtmo/docker-android.

You can script it using adb connect (which is itself scriptable using Python of course, so you can easily tie it into other tools).

>>645

>optimisation

Speaking of metadata analysis, UK anon gets it.:)

>>658

Good recommendation.