>>66219
>"why is evil included in the structure of our reality?"
To get lamb kebabs, you have to harm a sheep—kill one sheep—and possibly harm the forest—use firewood to cook the kebabs. But the sheep itself is not innocent either; it ate grass, harming the grass its entire life. And if you don't kill the sheep and don't roast it for kebabs, then you, a human being, will remain hungry, and that is also evil.
Vegetarianism is not straightforward solution either. Farmers' fields are intended for plants that are useful to humans as food, but what about other plants? They may not be useful to humans, but they also have the right to live, and there may be creatures for whom they are useful to. Therefore, mass vegetarianism also harms Flora and those who benefit from it.
In other words, when you give a dog a piece of meat, you cause some kind of damage to yourself, your family, and your finances, but you do good to the dog. When you give something to someone, there is always good and evil involved and vice versa. However, sometimes it is better to feed your dog than to live only to accumulate resources, given that you are not immortal, your body is not eternal, and there is no point in collecting resources endlessly under such conditions, because there will be an end.
