/qresearch/ -  Q Research

>>23160553

Brian Bosworth got Tyson's tattoo?

>>23160570

Now that's a well trained lil cock warmer. kek

whats the real count ?

#28243 >>23159685

>>23159696 LIVE: White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt

>>23159703 FBI: Hundreds of Alleged Child Predators Arrested in Texas

>>23159707 The DOJ’s attorney says will pursue charges against LaMonica McIver (D-N.J.)

>>23159708 Trump Truths: Thank God Trump acted quickly

>>23159724 MI Dem Candidate for Gov. Sued, Impeached, over Hidden Documents from 2020 Election

>>23159736 Fire Explodes Alongside LA Mayor Karen Bass On Air As She Tells CNN Everything Is Fine

>>23159778 POTUS is a musical genius

>>23159784 whois nokings.org #redacted

>>23159794 Did you know there's only 1 Q post signed "-The WH"?

>>23159796 @SecDef "We’re not interested in naming ships after activists.

>>23159839 Ukrainian national charged over assassination plot in Russia

>>23159873 POTUS tells the story of how his parents discovered his musical talents as a young boy

>>23159908 Evidence Biden DOJ Worked with CO Officials Leading Up to Tina Peters’ Imprisonment

>>23159962 PAM BLONDIE PRESS CONFERENCE

>>23159974 ABC caught using Gaza footage to depict Russian strike on Ukraine

>>23160049 PressSec wrecks a Fake News reporter over the LA riots

>>23160097 Protesters in Chicago have completely TAKEN OVER the streets.

>>23160155 WhiteHouse Trump Dance

>>23160234 Professor Sends Email Encouraging Campus To Join LA Protests

>>23160245 Jury convicts Harvey Weinstein

>>23160296 U.S. Naval Forces Command in Bahrain has been placed on high alert.

>>23160303 American Embassy in Baghdad is preparing for an evacuation

>>23160327 GM to invest $4 billion to shift some production from Mexico to the US

>>23160353 LA mayor calls for end to ICE raids and deployment of federal troops

>>23160432 Anon opines problem with Cali

>>23160444 In the comments is a list of all of the organizations sponsoring the riots

CALLING IT

HOLD THAT SHIT DIGGERS!!!

>>23160559

The President can deploy federal troops within the United States without a governor’s request under several specific legal authorities — primarily under the Insurrection Act.

🔒 Legal Basis: The Insurrection Act

Codified at 10 U.S.C. §§ 251–255, the Insurrection Act authorizes the President to deploy U.S. Armed Forces domestically in the following situations without a governor’s request:

✅ 1. To Suppress an Insurrection Against the Federal Government

10 U.S.C. § 252 – Use of militia and armed forces to enforce Federal authority

If rebellion or obstruction makes it impracticable to enforce U.S. law by regular means, the President may deploy troops to suppress the insurrection and enforce federal law.

Example: Little Rock, Arkansas (1957) — Eisenhower sent the 101st Airborne to enforce desegregation orders against the governor’s will.

✅ 2. To Protect Civil Rights When States Refuse or Fail to Act

10 U.S.C. § 253 – Interference with State and Federal law

If people are being denied their constitutional rights, and the state is unable or unwilling to protect them, the President may act without state consent.

Example: Civil Rights era deployments (e.g., Ole Miss, 1962).

✅ 3. To Suppress Domestic Violence That Obstructs Law

Still under § 253

The President may intervene if domestic violence obstructs law execution, either federal or state, and the state requests help, or the violence threatens constitutional rights.

In this case, a request is typically required, unless the violence threatens federal interests or civil rights.

🔄 NOT COVERED by Insurrection Act:

General law enforcement

Crowd control at protests or political events

State-level criminal activity without federal obstruction

These remain governed by Posse Comitatus, unless authorized by statute or in coordination with civilian federal agencies (e.g., DOJ, DHS).

🚫 Misconceptions Cleared

No need for governor's request when enforcing federal authority against rebellion, obstruction, or denial of constitutional rights.

The President cannot deploy troops to enforce state law without state consent.

"Islam Has FAILED" - Tommy Robinson BLASTS Islam Invasion, Muslim Grooming Gangs & Media Silence

>>23160493

Shills N Grifters trying hard to make Trump and Elon a thing.

These people think you can publically call POTUS a child rapist and call for impeachment like a dem rat and think it's all cool bruh.

Kek.

Need bitch slapping to the ground.

>>23160126

Invaders dont.

>>23160602

kek

>>23160586

>Yes — Acts of violence against federal resources *can* be sufficient reason for the President to deploy troops without a governor’s request, if certain legal thresholds are met under the Insurrection Act or related statutory authority.

—

### ✅ LEGAL JUSTIFICATION: Key Provisions

#### 1. 10 U.S.C. § 252 – Obstruction of Federal Law

> The President may use the armed forces if "unlawful obstructions, combinations, or assemblages, or rebellion against the authority of the United States" make it impracticable to enforce federal law through judicial means.

🔹 Violence against federal personnel, property, or infrastructure can qualify as obstruction.

—

#### 2. 10 U.S.C. § 253 – Protection of Constitutional Rights

> If insurrection, domestic violence, or unlawful conspiracy results in deprivation of federally protected rights, and local authorities fail or refuse to act, the President may deploy troops without a state request.

🔹 If attacks on federal resources are part of a broader civil rights violation (e.g. targeting federal courthouses during desegregation), this statute may apply.

—

#### ✅ Historical Precedent

* Portland, Oregon (2020) – Federal officers were deployed to protect courthouses. While regular troops were *not* used, the federal government invoked authority over federal property protection.

* Little Rock, Arkansas (1957) – Troops were sent when federal orders (school desegregation) were defied, which included attacks on federalized resources (National Guard units re-tasked to enforce federal law).

—

### 🚫 LIMITS

* Not every violent protest or property damage qualifies.

* There must be a significant obstruction to federal function or threat to constitutional order.

* President cannot use the military to enforce state laws or suppress ordinary crime unless other criteria are met.

—

### 🧾 Summary

| Triggering Event | Can President Deploy Troops? | Requires Governor Request? |

| --------------- | ------ | ----—- |

| Violence against federal property (e.g. courthouses, federal buildings) | ✅ Yes, under 10 U.S.C. § 252 | ❌ No |

| Widespread obstruction of federal law | ✅ Yes | ❌ No |

| Destruction that prevents constitutional rights | ✅ Yes | ❌ No |

| Ordinary state-level criminal unrest | 🚫 No | ✅ Yes (under § 251) |

>>23160574

Literally god's chosen.

But which god?

>>23160592

fabulous interview, must listen.

notable

>>23160614

oops

>>23160620

repost NB pls anon

>>23160564

Is that why the account has to delete so many old tweets supporting every grifter that comes along?

>>23160534

The arrests have been ongoing for a very long time, remember the sealed indictments vs unsealed? It just hasn't been shared with the public, most likely to avoid unrest by crazies.

>>23160620

the interview is blahblah

muslims are everywhere, faggot

EU is black Kalifat

>>23160620

Hello mossad

now get fucked with your ziobullshit

>>23160611

"She's a slut, Norman!"

>>23160630

*horrible!!!

freshness awaits

>>23160608

>>23160608

>>23160608