/qresearch/ - Q Research

Fine Work Gentlemen

o7

What are everyone's thoughts… or the usual order of business… for notables already notabled 12 hours ago? 24 hours ago? It makes sense to keep it out normally, but when it's really notable, or a powerful narrative driver, or something that many anons instantly find notable when it reappears later on, do you allow it?

TIA

Tyb/o/v

>>15571798

You can let them know it's already been noted or have them ck if you're not sure/foggy. Also, if sauce is lacking, ask anons to help provide what you need and they usually will. If it's a narrative playing out, it's important to have the truth play out along with the fake. Also digs and more details can add to the truth/depth of a story. So, for me it's a yes depending. Also consider that many normies and also anons are busy and don't have time to ck far back into notables. Showing additional reporting from various sources on a same story can also help to booster confidence in other media outlets to report on the same (something that could get them hot water). Also, some events boosts moral and wearly soldiers need plenty of it and along with that, sometimes it's more enjoyable to get caught up, while lurking in the current thread (one reason I like posting several pages of notes). Sorry tldr kek, but my answer is yes.

>>15571798

The only time imho that notables should be recycled is the early morning 'eyes on' dayshift, meaning the last couple of breads of midshift should be a comprehensive summary of the last 24 hours. Then during day and nighshift there really shouldn't be any repeats except the 'high interest' stuff like the Freedom Convoy / Potato Ukraine adventure etc…

But the ones that really shouldn't get much oxygen are the false flag/false narrative stories that are obviously red herrings. Just like a newsroom QR is pushing narratives except our narratives our the truth as we know it, so if there's a big push to overturn a fake narrative, repeating news items might be necessary.

If we had some sort of weekly 'live discussion' with bakers we could sure talk about those things. We need 'intelligent bakers' that know the current issues, current narratives and current fakenews narratives.

>>15572810

>midshift

KYS newfag

>>15571798

good point, sometimes important things are reposted for another shift

usually not notabled again by custom

>>15573948

>>15574100

I changed it all

for (you)

What's the big deal?

>>15574100

You seriously sound like a psychopath

Is this what I handed off to?

>>15573824 ob

Wave 2 of the push for Baker ID or something?

>>15574267

I put a disclaimer on the one, and changed the other headlines

Hope your shower washes off that glow

>>15574319

Okay Groomer

>>15574439

I'm not Jim. Are you larping as someone? You chuckled off the requests which were tactfully made. I go to bed when I want, but yes I am ready.

>>15574463

Sounds to me like you're just a lousy gatekeeper

Sweet dreams

>>15574608

Yea, I used to only have one ip. Then I got banned and deleted, so now I have a vpn. Nuttin' wrong w/research or anons talking it out. Your notes glow tho, and so does your baking buddy & other pals'.

>>15573824

>>15573866

>>15573880

>>15574283

>>15574348

>>15573781

>>15573753

zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

>>15574697

> Your notes glow tho

Freemasonry must be a real touchy subject subject for you, police too, oh my…

Since you have nothing better to do than stalk bakers and critique their notes

why don'tcha just start bread where you can play connect the dots?

I'll come and larp along with you using my Baker Passport!

(and all required paperwork, for your faggot mandates)

>>15574544

>implying

>>15573948

quite a few of these seem sauced, the masonic stuff needs to come out - same guy is posting right now, 79 post out of 210.

some that you object to are videos - which do need moar sauce to go in notables. I often look them up and provide the sauce. We can all do that - if videos seems not so good, watch a little and say so.

>>15575574

this is bo, looks like ip jumped.

>>15573270

It's another bakers term for late night early morning.

>>15574199

you wanna get kicked out again

NO NAMECALLING

and please do not include MASONIC SHILLING in notes - that should come out 100% of the time.

Make your own anti-Mason board is it means so much to you.

>>15573948

So you don't like the notes - fine. Dislike the baker? Ok. But focus on specific criticisms. Some are valid, not all. Be careful to stick to stuff you can really document and don't encourage fights, ok?

>>15574267

So he called you a name. Now you're gonna get into it? No. Not here. No fights, this thread is for grownups.

>>15574299

>>15574319

>>15574327

>>15574100

>>15574157

>>15574199

>>15574236

>>15574236

>>15574267

>>15574299

>>15574319

>>15574327

>>15574354

>>15574439

>>15574463

>>15574495

>>15574544

>>15574557

>>15574594

>>15574608

>>15574697

>>15574777

>>15574813

STOP THE BS

I'm not gonna have this entire bread filled up with nonsense in a week.

One moar exchange and you're both outta here for a week.

>>15575605

My bad BO, I legit thought I was keeping an eye out, was calling out what appeared to me to be fuckery in the kitchen. Sorry, I had no intention to eat up this bread. I didn't realize it's childish to bring squabbles here instead of the general, even tho I could have just stated my issue and left it at that and not let baker trigger me. Next time I have an issue, I'll mind my own business or deal with it over there.

>>15575582

So graveyard shift?

>>15575585

>NO NAMECALLING

It's apparently the faggots full time job to attack and gaslight me,

So if he'd stop acting like a PSYCHO GANGSTALKER I'd stop responding as such

And if this was the type of immature namecalling you're suggesting

I'd call him a peepeepoopoo butthead, rather than simply describing the situation.

If you haven't noticed, I'm not the one starting these altercations

Yet I'm the bad guy for standing up to it?

>>15575585

>Make your own anti-Mason board is it means so much to you.

I made a bread for it, problem solved

Don't forget to screenshot his post though

>>15574813

Apparently he has insider knowledge

How i put YouTub

Loop

>>15575605

>I'm not gonna have this entire bread filled up with nonsense in a week.

SECONDED

PLS REDIRECT COMPLAINTS AND ACCUSATIONS

vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv

>>15578478 OFFICIAL DOGE COMPLAINT BREAD

'''THIS THREAD IS FOR ADMIN ISSUES, I AM NOT ADMIN

IF YOU HAVE AN ISSUE WITH ME, BRING IT UP WITH ME'''

>>15573220

BO, please delete the 4th image.

>>15579717

>>15578529

>PLS REDIRECT COMPLAINTS

Yeah, my wife keeps leaving the toilet seat up.

>>15579985

Savage

>>15576629

Right. Bring up the issue, attach EVIDENCE of same - caps, etc - and you've done your due diligence. Admins watch what goes on.Evidence is the key, not argument.

o7

>>15577953

Most bakers have been attacked countless times. So what? I can't say i have never called somebody faggot (etc), but rarely. Because most of the time, I make my points with rational arguments and evidence. I suggest you do the same.

Namecalling is the lazy way to attack people - resolves nothing.

Describing the situation means thoroughly describing it, so that third parties understand - not making vague accusations. And also limiting your critique to what you can back up with actual evidence and conservative comments. Not, for example, seeing someone do something careless or making a mistake and crying "comp'd." Even if others do it to you - and they WILL - don't do it back. That is what is meant by grownup.

>Make your own anti-Mason board is it means so much to you.

I made a bread for it, problem solved

the one with the doge on it?

Better than arguing here, maybe you'll draw all the others who want to argument just because

Just make sure you monitor it for CP

PS

nobody is against you here

BO/BVs are trying to help you use your talents wisely, not with BS. Your choice whether to listen or not.

>>15569378 off bread

Been reported several times, yet still persists

BO please eliminate

You motherfuckers better hold the line. I didn't wake up to an "Inbound Ballistic Missile" warning that lead me to Q just to give up now. I'm GenX fuckers…let's see this through. Low n Ready

BO - Could we pick one banner right now tonight, and start using it, THEN have the contest? (like, next week?)

Use one standard immediately then go to whatever gets voted in? Does this make sense?

>>15581997

sounds faggoty. who's making all this fucking drama, is it you? are we doing some kind of glownigger training?

jump through the hoops goyim!

>>15582810

It's about making a easily recognizable icon for the dough. It's not drama to me. I'm not sure why you feel it's drama.

Dart just instructed to lower the 'previous notable' entry log to 7 lines.

Request that it be increased to 10 minimum, 15 would be better imho.

Any reason we're allowing the board to be spammed with 91 posts of mushrooms? Doesn't make much sense to me, but that's just me.

Using the board tools to stalk and harass anons is really juvenile and what OSS used to do to anons. I can only hope that this does not become a habit.

I don't mind Being Stalked.

As you were Gentlemen.

>>15584887

How about 'harassed'?

You want the full package or just the stalking?

>>15584927

What is Love?

>>15584937

KEK!!!

To Tracker - whatever the fuck I said that has you pissed off. Sorry. Can we please get back to the job now? Bakers can't do this job when BV's are beating them over the head. It's been 3 days now.

>>15585052

I don't see any problems

What are you speaking of?

>>15583729

it's another inhouse thing to argue about and an infringements on our freedoms.

if anons cant find the general without a special picture …

>>15586599

>Autist here, I like the colors, dont mess with the banners, allow diversity we are not insects.

seconded

>>15584048

Was it reported?

>>15583736

>10 minimum, 15 would be better imho

Myself suggested 9x3 (27 breads which should cover 3-4 days), but believe the end result of discussion was BO said 7x3 21 breads ~2 days.

BOcan you comment when you have a chance?

Maybe 7x4 that would be 28 breads??

Tested on phone and it only shows 2 columns for previous so it would be 14x2 on a phone.

>>15581141

Think BO said when there is no one around to deal with it anons would have to filter and report, it gets dealt with when someone sees the report.

Since it now shows dead link it appears to have been dealt with

>>15586658

Good glad to hear it's over.

Calling anons punk ass bitches and editing their posts is exactly the kind of shit that will get bullshit started on the board again. Knock it off. Using the BV position to get revenge is bullshit

>>15587035

I can live with 7,9, 10, 15. That to me is getting way in the weeds and nitpicking but I realize the need. I've seen 20 or more and I've seen 4 or less. I'll certainly keep it at 7. We need to work together.

>>15587242

This board is at a tender place right now. Let's all try harder to be more.

can we have a lobby shitposting bread for times we have to wait on bakers to bake bred

>>15587351

2nded

<pinned shitpost bread to fall back to so people don't shit the dough

Thoughts on QSG??

Notarized soverignty or are syntaxers joining together to fix current states? Bounties?

>>15587439

Thanks anon. Last thing I want to do is to cause problems.

>>15587458

>Thoughts on QSG??

Wrong Board & Bread for that.

https://apples.extension.org/understanding-apple-tree-size-dwarf-semi-dwarf-and-standard/

>>15581997

Try to be patient, had IRL stuff had to deal with today. have been nowhere but here for 3 weeks. Slow down just a little. Cannot turn everything around instantly, collect info, think about it, then act.

>>15583736

Why 15? Who uses it and for what?

(not /sarc/ - just why so long?)

Anons can search qresear.ch. Much better way ino to find things.

>>15584048

staff is in the process of trying to determine what needs deleting and what doesn't. if we delete too litlle - well, that's how things have been for years. if we delete too much, tho, anons object - because they can't see what was deleted and think maybe it was good stuff. see the problem? we gotta work things out, this kind of problem is new for us too.

>>15590291

this is bo, had to switch vpn when shopping locally, start getting ads in french or something

>>15590291

there is one of me plus a small staff

we're not slackers but things take time to set right (and the biggest part of that time's involved in figuring out what that meas).

if it ever looks like there is "nothing happening," that's never true. Plenty happening.

slows things down to discuss with anons, but would you rather we just did stuff and poof! is was done, nobody expected?

probably not.

Re disagreement with staff

Staff came into this board unexpectedly, din know all the dynamics, but still had to step up and manage stuff like CP, spam, catalog, comms with 8kun, fighting bakers anon complaints, etc, etc. On a HUGE board under constant attack by shills.

It's not a big crew and some have many IRL responsibilities. We are trying to do our best. But it's gonna be bumpy for a while as we trying to figure out where the board's at, how we can best serve it, and avoid burnout from trying to do everything for everybody.

Please bear with us. It's a good crew but not perfect coz there's no such tings. We're all volunteers here - and the BVs are working 7 days a week right now to keep things together. We apologize for missing the mark at times but glad anons are concerned enough about the board to speak up.

PATIENCE is the watchword. Going slow but continuing to move in the right direction. o7

>>15590431

If your Hiring Volunteers

Look me up

>>15590477

I remember anons asking FJ about anon volunteers, he didn't really answer.

All the volunteers are anons now.

Usual route is to either bake to take on some ongoing responsibility, such as archiving, planefagging, memefagging (like memefarmer), note-taking, develop a qr database (ResignationAnon), etc. Necessary to develop an ongoing relationship of trust with staff. Here, our resumes are our work products.

One reason i can't help but recommend that bakers who want to take on more responsibility become more 'known.'

>>15592372

>>15590291

>>>15583736

>Why 15? Who uses it and for what?

damn and none of you ever realized i went 17 lines of pb links the whole time i baked.

kek muh symbolism

>>15593175

A banner is a Bakers Badge of Honor.

And in essence you are removing that badge of honor, if anons dont like a banner they will let the baker know.

Anons Know

I AM WILLING TO WORK WITH A POOL OF APPROVED BANNERS THAT CAN BE SLIGHTLY MODED TO BAKERS TASTE

>>15593803

>I AM WILLING

>THAT CAN BE SLIGHTLY MODED TO BAKERS TASTE

Not the baker's board. Option is being given to vote for or submit banner

When did baker's become so full of themself?

>>15593832

You guys are losing the crowd. I'd back off. You already don't have the support you need. I'd concentrate on bakers. This board does not belong to the BO or the mods. It is a community asset. Be careful.

>>15593803

I agree with this approach. A pool of approved banners. Memefags love showcasing their work on banners. I'm not sure I see a need to go to one banner. My personal opinion is that it's not that big of a deal and I'll bake with one banner but that's not the opinion I see from the community.

>>15594455

>You guys are losing the crowd.

You are already stating division

This anon has been baking a long time

Came back after the ban happy BV left

>You already don't have the support you need.

More than you realize

>This board does not belong to the BO

Literally BO is BOARD OWNER

> It is a community

Forum

>Be careful.

Don't threaten me anon

>>15594560

I tried to warn you. Being careful is not a threat. I want you to be successful but tyrannical crackdowns is not the way to do it.

The comms radicalism is back. Great

>>15594586

Obviously you are a newfag

The original banner was always the same

The decision has been proposed to Anons and the overwhelming majority are for it

>>15594613

Do what you want. Your tribal approach to running the board was disastrous the last time and I'm not sure why taking the same approach this time will be any different. I'll continue to support BO 100% and hope the BV's will calm down but all I can do is offer advice, which doesn't seem very welcome at the moment so I'll shut up. She's yours to pilot.

o7

>>15593175

Hear what you are saying.

But the "MICROMANAGEMENT" of banners did not begin now. It began with a flat-out FORCED change over a year ago - with ZERO DISCUSSION.

Put another way, anons tried to discuss. Baker said NO. End of story.

People get used to thing after a while. But there have been problems - and a new problem arose with Papi banner.

the GENERALS banner is NOT a place for individuals to express their creativity, but a place to express our COLLECTIVE VISION as QResearch

Hence - the contest for SINGLE banner which most anons can get behind.

>>15593190

>anons know

Why there has been a discussion.

>>15593803

>>15593832

Exactly the point.

>>15594455

>>15594491

>>15594586

>>15594596

>>15594637

Wasn't it you who was seeking a quick resolution?

Your argument goes back to allowing anons to express creativity. What memefags love. Appreciate memefags immensely. But they have many opportunities to express themselves that they use daily.

Tribal approach -

asking for feedback before making a decision is not tribal. And this is not a radical decision, imo. NOR AN IRREVERSIBLE ONE.

>>15594727

Hey, I'm just anon. What do I know? Choose a banner I'll bake with it and that's the extent of my involvement. Thanks.

>>15594747

>Hey, I'm just anon. What do I know?

Considering you posted the first Papi banner. Not much

>>15594771

Kek, have you tracked down who made the Papi banner and given them a noseful too? Those damn stupid anons.

>>15594771

Just for shits and giggles since you guys like the last word, what is the problem with the Papi banner? Why is it being used to choose your single banner?

>>15594790

>Kek, have you tracked down who made the Papi banner and given them a noseful too? Those damn stupid anons.

Point is not all agree with it and it has gotten out of hand. Definitely a hive thing.

Maybe mnr also

Not all anons agree, how new are you?

>>15594806

Handle with care

Includes the banners

The world is watching

Looks like the place turned into the Bee or RRN

>>15594810

Can you sauce the complaints? In other words, wasn't it your intent the whole time, based on your fight with OSS, to stop the multiple banners and you're using the Papi banner as a reichstag fire to do it? Where are the anon complaints about multiple banners being used? Where is the sauce?

>>15594810

What has gotten out of hand? Who doesn't agree with it other than the BO tribe? You're making a lot of assertions with no evidence.

>>15594835

>You're making a lot of assertions with no evidence.

kmfao

Pot, meet kettle.

>You guys are losing the crowd.

>You already don't have the support you need.

>This board does not belong to the BO

>>15594855

I was trying to help you with my comments. Unsourced opinion.

>>15594866

You were being a divisionfag, nothing moar

>>15594880

That's an emotional response to criticism that you don't like. I'm 100% trying to support this staff. I gave you my honest opinions in support of you. You might want to re-think your assessment that I'm against you or trying to divide anons.

>>15594892

>You guys are losing the crowd.

>You already don't have the support you need.

>You might want to re-think

>>15594933

Now we're going round and round. That's why I'm pulling back. If my opinion isn't welcome that's fine.

>>15594806

go track down the discussion and see for yourself

just look for the first papi banner.

>>15594892

don't know your motives, more interested in actions - and reasoned arguments.

>>15594727

>>15593832 Exactly my point.

what is a board without the community?

BO we know u run the board, but the board is for community use. me feelz micrmanaging community. people do volunteer their time to come and bake and post and notable.

WHEN A PERSON BAKES, IT IS THEIR CHOICE TO BAKE

thus, bakers choice imo

CONFORM NOW OR ELSE?

>>15595555

>>15595555

>>15595555

>>15595555

kek gave u shout out ob

>>15595601

i'm still ok with a dynamic banner pool tho

>thread?

please refresh

>>15595601

>>15595627

community matters, why we had a discussion.

baking is one thing, choosing the image is another - imo

when i bake, i have many choices

deciding the banner is - as you say - the community's choice

that is the intention here

A pool would be ok

single banner is ust simpler and worked previously - makes general breads easier to find, as well. why proposed

>>15595851

*will support

>>15593175

Notable

>>15594349

words of reason

>>15594586

Telling anyone irl or in text 'be careful' is a threat.

You clearly lack a law background.

>>15593175

Powerful words

>>15597417

Interesting Point of View.

>>15597417

>there is no standard

Respectully disagree.

There has always been a standard

based on the values embodied in Q posts

it was implicit

implicit standards are easily undermined

but as long as Q was posting, the way he posted and things he said reminded of what he stood for.

Freedom of speech, patriotism, unity, and a certain sense of dignity and responsibility.

Q said "tidy up the ship".

We can argue about what that means, but whatever it is - it certainly involves standards based on values.

Freedom without order = anarchy.

Thoughts?

>>15595745

>>15595851

>>15597783

same post, ip switch.

It's about the kids. It's about the truckers. It's about mask mandates. It's about vaccine mandates. It's about opening schools and churches.

It's not about banners. It's not about baker ids. It's not about 7 lines of former notables. It's not about anon / baker compliance.

WAKE THE FUCK UP

>>15597417

>Humbly suggest that the problem was the enforcement of a standard when there was none before.

That is absolutely false

See >>15596867 (ob)

Can confirm, was there.

>rules that shouldn't exist at all.

Anon will side with DJT on this, Law & Order

Not the Demonrat Chaos & Anarchy, that you suggest

>>15593175

I'llsecondthis. Although eliminating banner choice would give shills one less weapon to suck us into pointless arguments.

>>15598386

>WAKE THE FUCK UP

Are you bipolar anon?

"100% Support BO" in contest thread.

>Meta starting arguments

Kinda creepy

Where is the board/thread to recommend new features for 8 Kun?

>>15598580

/tech/

>>15598580

>>15598726

>>>/tech/

Not Cool Tracker.

Banners have a life of their own,

they grown and change over time.

>>15598386

>>15599111 (ob)

>>15599040

>>15599065

plz also post in Contest thread, so all anons can see?

https://8kun.top/qresearch/res/15592217.html

>>15598470

Showing your true colors BV? Tracking and stalking anons using board tools to harass them? Just like OSS? Cool.

The Papi Baker Insurrection.

The Papi J6 Committee.

Meet the new boss. Same as the old boss.

>>15599547

Agreed. True colors are being shown.

Q Research Italia #2bis: Reborn

Last post, CP link

Thread may be locked but can still see link

Please delete

>>15599703

Cause everybody knows a good banner contest will help the truckers and win freedom across the world.

#FREETHEBANNERS

>>15600723

The Papi Baker wrap up smear. These people are stupid.

>>15600522

Just like OSS?

This sounds like you're projecting.

See bans happening?

> stalking anons

Preventing troublemakers from stirring up shit.

>Meet the new boss. Same as the old boss.

Not nearly.

Childish outlook tho

BO what does this part mean in the end of dough

[Bakers - please retain in the dough]

I have a story with anonymous movement 13 year's ago i think

it has to be anonymous movement not QAnon movement

They weren't following a conspiracy theory

I smelled the scent of illuminati

It was larp

They were not anonymous conspiracy theory

So they failed

My memory takes me back

I said who the hell are these?

A global movement against Satan's regime

that's My movement

It turned out to be fake bullshit

but 80% is white hat of anonymous

whether founded by illuminati or not

It will get out of their control

As AJ

people were saying AJ C_A

I said it doesn't matter

This crazy one has to continue his shit

So we get back our anonymous movement

legitimate heirs

Every Anonymous appears on TV

Not a legitimate representative of Anonymous

That movement died because

It was established in a wrong way which made the world's intelligence enter in

And because I did not agree with the leadership

I don't know in which intelligence base they were meeting

But the propaganda had to go on So people get excited

The result is a biblical movement and white hats army On the ruins of that movement

i was 20,s that time anonymous conspiracy theory

How was and how is turn

Time is everything

Put the link of the site in the vulnerabilities tool then use Blockchain proxy on Sqlmap

they say it's safe more than Tor

Now I don't know how to use Tor to post here

There is no passion like before

I was the must White hat failure

I discovered a vulnerability in the White House website

I don't know why I didn't try to use it

It would have been the most important raid in anonymous history

Porn sites was power than white house site

When Satan was control the world

I was raised to be outlaw of Satan system

Waiting for the movement that will burn it down

it was always biblical

>>15601005

Nah - just calling out your stupid games you're playing on anons to lock down shit you shouldn't even be concerned with.

Use the board to save humanity, not to piss off and harass anons dum dum.

>>15603325

>Tell me you're Commies without saying you're Commies.

Did you say that to 8bit also?

Newfags don't know anything

>>15598470

I still support BO 100%. What I don't support is smearing an anon to get something you want that you can't get unless you have some sort of 'reichstag fire' to get it. That's really low making anon a patsy. The lowest of low.

We can all do better.

>>15605760

>smearing an anon

Who smeared you anon?

That would suggest false statements were made to disparage your character.

Were false statements made?

Who made the statement?

Can you prove they are false?

Or can they prove they are fact?

>>15606032

Those who know know.

Not Cool

Should have put it to a vote

New banner is even worse than the old one

You have terrible tastes

>>15606905

contest is still on, anon. thru sat night.

there is no new banner at this point.

>>15606748

>Those who know know.

So you have no evidence.

You are the one making the smears.

You are the one trying to cause problems.

Won't work.

>>15607116

Fuck your mandates, Trudeau.

>>15607186

How's the discord server? Get up to 8 people yet?

>>15607180

There's different ways to deal with dirtbags that think they're clever and are some secret agent. No need for a bunch of screenshots. This anon would advise loving and serving anons in the future instead of hating on them and using them as patsies.

>>15607243

Stop causing trouble.

Problem solved.

No hate involved here anon.

>>15607288

No trouble as long as your gang keeps their noses clean.

>>15607294

>your gang keeps their noses clean.

Not in a gang

unless you count American Patriot

Or gold mining

>>15607314

Then stop running like one. Pack of dogs would be more applicable.

10 minutes of OSS hate rituals going splendidly, big brother. No wrongthought here. No criticism is allowed because ideological enemy is behind every blade of grass. >>15607106

>>15607106

The banner was changed (I was one of a group that included Barkeep, OSS and 3/4 other anons that all agreed the Q_Anon had to come off the banner) to take the Q_Anon off the banner. It morphed into multiple banners as memefags started riffing off of it. That's how the banner got changed and it was multiple people involved. It wasn't structured like BO is doing it now, it was more of a couple of late night discussions involving many anons.

As far as the rest, BO has it exactly correct. OSS started terrorizing everybody at the same time. The people that helped him get control of the board for FJ (I was one. I just started baking) became his enemies after he consolidated power. He turned us ALL against each other. The last he turned on was Barkeep and I really haven't seen Barkeep since (maybe 2 days ago Barkeep baked?).

Yes, the banner aside, OSS was involved in blowing the baker shed up and turning anons against each other.

>>15607106

If you were about evidence you'd have shown all the screenshots of the Papi banner dissent that caused this ill advised banner lockdown. you'd have given dates and times of the number of anons that were offended. You'd have shown evidence in how the board was statistically impaired by the use of the banner once by me and once by other baker.

No, this isn't about evidence. This is about you getting with your BV's and reining them in. This is about the BO knowing better than to mess with something that isn't broken.

The 'smear' occurred to get to the banner lockdown. Not cool

>>15607513

>>15607464

If BO and BV's fail the anons are just as fucked as them. I'm on your side whether you believe me or not.

I'm going to say this one more time and I hope it will be considered. The memefags LOVE making Q Research banners and nobody has even considered them in this. The solution of posting their banners on the dough post (imho) is akin to putting them in the back of the bus. Right or wrong this is what Q Research evolved to and I'm still failing to see the downside to continuing at least with a set of BO pre-approved banners.

>>15607464

Figured OSS take out the kitchen first, then invite newbies to bake - once they didn't, he'd denounce them. Rinse and repeat.

>>15607546

Re banner -

If you don't agree with that decision, fine. Don't mind being unpopular.

Chan's aren't really set up to promote participatory rule, we do what we can.

>>15607513

Want your old BVs back? The ones who did nothing, didn't check in, or spent all day banning anons for no reason? Blaming everything that went wrong on shills?

Current BVs are working all the time. Responding to Reports, looking for CP in catalog, deleting spam, fixing bread numbers & doughs, answering anon q's, posting "refresh" and post counts, adding resources. And doing it 7 days a week since Jan 12.

Don't expect perfection. Don't expect to have it easy. Re-read the "welcome" - you are in a war zone. Admins are not the enemy.

>>15607710

Thanks

>>15607710

Tone deaf on the banners, but I can live with tone deaf. This isn't a normal chan, and you can't make that assertion stick. You need to evolve your thinking on that imho. BO and BV's are not the decision makers in a vacuum. Sorry.

>>15607710

>>15607723

Late night discussions like this will serve you well, not in Meta, on the board. Anons will carry water for you like gunga din

>>15607738

I'll tell you how I've seen successful implementations on QR - come on the board late at night as BO and say "Hey, I want to do this. What do you think?" You'll know within about 45 minutes if it'll fly or not. This banner thing was not good and the worst of timing and you would have found that out instantly rather than all the stupid papi shit then the contest that has no end.

>>15607546

>I'm going to say this one more time and I hope it will be considered. The memefags LOVE making Q Research banners and nobody has even considered them in this

I made 65 Q research

and 10 the storm series banners

I am a long time memefag

Did not ask you to speak for me

I disagree with your assessment

Prefer the OG banner

Speak only for yourself

I'll leave you all with this. If we conduct ourselves in an echo chamber with our intent and our actions, we are no better than the tyrants we're attempting to replace. It takes difficult debate to forge the road ahead and if you don't have that debate you are cursed by your own ignorance that traps you inside a bubble of blindess.

>>15607815

Then how did so many Q Research banners get made? Did the memefags hate making them? Do you speak for all memefags? I certainly do not. I speak for the memefags that love making banners and there are many.

It is necessary to use Tor here

Can someone explain in a video?

This VNP too slow AS the Tor Link is slow too

Have Nunes joined the board Yet

Regarding Truth Social

must open an alternative to WhatsApp

as Facebook and Facebook messenger

That's what people need a safe messenger

talk to their relatives, friends and neighbors

I think that is more important than current method

This is what makes the Truth Social successful

it's MAGA app as gttr gab parler

limited opposite Facebook and Twitter

Anyway

No one knows when the NET shutdown

>>15607836

>>15608978

Don't know why you don't use anons talents in dough post, where it's always been show cased, displayed, was never a place for bakers to mark the bread as theirs, what a fucked up idea oss started and bakers just carried it further with the banner

>>15609960

>Muh OSS boogieman for everything

As has been stated numerous times, that was driven by anons not him.

This current admin basing everything (real & fake news) as a reaction to him is cringe af.

>>15610159

your head up your ass or what

oss put his avatar in the dough posts

oss started the Q_anon shit is bad

people who don't what is goin on are cringe AF

it's OK though, you keep waitin and suckin, mabbe he'll nut for ya

>>15610159

OSS didn't change the image - he DID change the dough. And at exactly the same time. see >>15607106. Coincidence?

Barkeep was not a typical anon. Neither were you. You were bakers - in a position to change the banner or the dough at will. OSS did it freely, even when anons objected. Unless mgmt objects, bakers have the final say.

>>15611389

in the dough post all good

just not the banner

I like that banner too, used it a few times, the maker is fren of bakers

>>15611636

have to wonder how memer feels about others marking their work

was made as banner for board

not fodder for baker claims

just sayin

>>15609960

>why you don't use anons talents in dough post, where it's always been show cased, displayed

>was never a place for bakers to mark the bread as theirs

>what a fucked up idea oss started and bakers just carried it further with the banner

ah so this is the reason

>>15612286

>POOL

>>15612295

>POOL

POOL is fine

just didn't come out a lot in the discussion

image submissions and what anons said made it possible to see that possibility

TY to those who have submitted

the more examples, the better

>>15612443

>Pool's closed

not yet

https://www.freedomstream.tv/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/Bergy_Affidavit_Exhibits_Notarized_20201207.pdf

refresh

Does step down mean Dead

Remain a judge to step down

If the Chief Justice

would be great

we under attack or what?

>>15618776

>under attack

you mean, bc of the lag?

probably

this site is always under attack - constantly

if mitigation measures were not taken, would be swamped with single ip attacks every half a dozen posts. Attack began a year ago, it's ongoing.

>>15621061

Please check Japanese NIHON bread for Loli Bear. I tried to post global but had filed “too many” global reports. He postin most of the top breads right nao.

>>15623967

See also the Bridges and Maps thread. Needs a global there too.

There a reason why I got stopped for posting too many globals? Was just trying to help. Don’t understand.

>>15621061

so these have nothing to do with my end?

becoming a regular thing… the reply box saying 'updating thread' after a few replies.

also it freezes up brave 3-4 times a day now.

>brave not responding

in 20 second intervals followed by 1-2 seconds of normalcy then back to frozen. Closing and reopening have been working but last night I had to reboot pc.

anon just upgraded to ryzen 7 5700G w/16yg ram. low income or would do more. can deal if nothing I can do on my end. what are other bakers experiencing when the lag happens and how do you deal on the fly when baking? Wait it out?

So far it's not the actual baking where it hurts me but the nitty gritty aggegating in the middle of the bread

Anyway, I'm rambling. feedback appreciated.

>>15624454

yeah it does that to me

if it's updating thread your post already submitted, I just refresh the page up to .html

>>15623967

>>15623986

i believe the limit for Global Reports is three.

>>15624454

board lag is usually from ddos

could also be from internet provider problems

nothing to do w/your computer - it's got enough power for 8

bakers deal with board lag on the fly

if it's for more than a few minutes, usually results in multiple threads (new bakers arrive and seeing no bread, create one)

the board lag problems we have now are nothing compared to what they were during replatforming.

during ddos, you can "lose" the Quick Reply box sometimes - first sign is often the loss of images (image servers go down first)

bakers just deal with this stuff

part of the territory

#19759

>>15625839 'invasion Wednesday' to distract from Clinton paying an outsider to hack the office of the president & same person raising the rhetoric is sullivan who was pushing the collusion

>>15625872, >>15626097, >>15626255, >>15626265, >>15626569 Justin Trudeau Pfizer and Moderna shots.Acuitas & Arbutus pharmaceuticals both out of British Columbia

>>15625875 Atlantic Council: A Hidden Hand Censoring the Internet and Pushing the US Toward War

>>15625887 Parliamentarians heard on Thursday that nobody was fired or held responsible for the federal government’s mishandling of the national emergency stockpile.

>>15625892 British Government Laundered Fake U.S. 'Intelligence' On Ukraine

>>15625900 New Zealand PM Jacinda Ardern Blames Mysterious ‘Imported’ Forces for Freedom Convoy

>>15625945 Why on Earth Does George Soros Want Xi Jinping to Go?

>>15625950 WTF Numerous States have given private and personal information about their residents to ERIC (Electronic Registration Information Center)

>>15625969, >>15625989 Robert Durham holds multiple patents protecting computer comms systems.

>>15625975 More Than 24 hrs After Durham Filing Revelations. Still not a single front page mention – AP, NYT, WaPo & WSJ.

>>15625978 NY Mayor tells social media companies to censor rap videos

>>15626005 Former Navy engineer charged with trying to sell nuclear sub secrets to appear in court for plea hearing

>>15626057 Clinton Campaign Lawyer Gave ‘Sensitive’ Trump Data to CIA, Special Counsel Claims

>>15626082 Soros-backed, Virginia prosecutor's office hired a registered sex offender without background check

>>15626104 Reuters, AP misled the public about how long mRNA nanoparticles persist in the body following vaccinations

>>15626200 Duchess Camilla, has also tested positive for the virus.

>>15626310 Trudeau's emergency act… fukers changed the name from WAR Measures

>>15626341 NSA Jake Sullivan Reportedly Asks US Congress to Offer $1 Billion Loan Guarantees to Ukraine

>>15626448 Unvaxxed Aussie MP reveals he took controversial horse drug loved by conspiracy theorists to battle Covid

>>15626460 Women sexually harassed by former High Court judge Dyson Heydon receive historic settlement

>>15626493 Cartel cannibals! Mexican drug lords force new members to kill rivals and eat their HEARTS

>>15626510 Sensitive addresses among more than 500,000 leaked from NSW Government database

>>15626543 Volodymyr Zelensky, President of Ukraine: Special Address | DAVOS 2020

Clown baker

>>15625859 Real Raw News in notables

Do you see it logical?

When you say military prophecy

Then you say the military failed

There is a reason for everything

It's not about the generals on screen or behind

it's about the prophecy and Q

I said to myself what is the reason that make Q leave the weapons

That prevented China and Iran from occupying Afghanistan In a week

Then they use it to plot against America

The Iranian has tried and Turkistan is china

It's an easy bite, these weapons changed the equation

Goys They won't understand it

Sending soldiers to Poland may prevent Russia from invade Ukraine with no harm

Sending soldiers to Ukraine would hurt

Russia is afraid now.russia can invade in hour's

As long as it's not a swamp

To engage the people in the armed struggle

Russia now wants to strengthen its Ukrainian armed wing

I don't think Biden understands that it's GOY too

>>15626712

>RRN

Understand the problem. Lots of bakers have quirks in case u din notice, ha ha. things they like that nobody else does or vice-versa. That'll always be the case.

but if baker likes sauce that nobody else respects like Sorcha Faal etc there's stuff you can do to make the argument stick.

Like dig to find another source. If nothing found, inform baker and ask "why not found if the news is real?"

Screenshot the lack of news with search term.

Ask - Why not wait if it's iffy? The news will break soon enough it it's real. Baker can still reject but evidence and good arguments make the arguers look reasonable and the baker look ….not so reasonable.

another idea - ask baker to put a QUESTION MARK after the headline and call for a DIG.

You can't force bakers to be reasonable but can make them look foolish if they stubbornly refuse reasonable feedback.

>>15627240

welcome lurker anon.

Handle is Flint.

But i never use it, not so far.

>special Flav

everyone brings that here

what makes the place pop

nice meme - stolen.

>>15627261

>frog got your tongue

that's me all right - but the couch is bigger.

KEK

>>15626921

>>15627277

can't answer most of the big questions

only ask one q each day: what to do right now to be in alignment with bigger picture/laws of life?

that is not a mental construct, it's a quest to grok the situation

simplifies complicated questions so it's possible to act wo/knowing everything

only u can figure a way to resolve mental contradictions - went thru that when younger, no longer a barrier. So there is a way.

>>15629487

>>15629600

still bo - getting kicked out of ip repeatedly

pain in the ass, captchas all day long

ugh.

>>15593024

Sorry, missed this earlier.

>need help w/mp4's

ask on QR, may or may not get help

thought about doing a workshop for newfags who want to participate but don't know how

espec if they are interested in taking responsibility for the board but don't want to baker or note-take yet

there are various things that can be done, suggest you detail what that task would involve (make "job description")

if i do a workshop on it, will make sure to let fags now there is support for them so they won't look stupid if they make a mistake

>>15593024

>why we have 2 Q proof threads

not a clue

will find out

>>15629612

Cleared your cache? Are you using a VPN? Is there anything you've tried or have you installed any updates recently?

>>15630762

good questions all

will see what i can find out

using baker tools lite - that is new

handy but might be a problem

>>15630837

Aight. It's usually something like that. Clear your history. Sometimes w/my VPN on, I can't get connected to this site. I turn off connect, then turn back on. That sometimes helps. If updates done recently, maybe try to roll back to an earlier date. What operating system? Also, have you ever edited your hosts file. At a time when some anons were editing hosts files, which fixed the prob for me, randomly unable to connect to this site. I deleted all the entries for this site from my hosts file and suddenly was able to access. I was down for a whole week before I figured that out. Frustrating. kek

>>15630837

After clearing history, x outta browser and then open fresh. If that don't work, try the VPN turn off then back on after loading site. If all that fails, reset your internet. Just turn off and leave unplugged for 10 minutes. Also if using VPN, try another location if you have a choice.

>>15631211

https://www.virustotal.com/gui/url/dbbe449a38d6378b9bd0f0a3256faa2c7196e8d39cfa5504e379584945414e3e?nocache=1

why are you such a fag

>>15631388

Die you fuckers

5 finger death puntxh

Or qorae

Do your beat

Or worae

Payback time

PAYBACK

Except for the ones doing dogs work.

>>15630897

I remember someone posted a good how to on modding hosts file and I did it and it worked on here for awhile.

Couldn't do it again or on my own without that how-to though, Kek.

Will clear cache and update.

Re: international research bread should it read

">>(link one), >>(link 2)"

now?

>>15637429

Disregard, I guess

Anon making suggestion refuses to explain in meta

are the site owners ever going to fix the 404 image errors or what?

>>15638917

so all baker should do if notified something was added or changed is forward to meta and say thanks?

I don't think anyone noticed you changed the banner image lb.

Kek.

>>15645184

Thank's

Why is no one talking about a prophecy of

The Gray Champion

Oldest prophecy of united state

The Gray Champion=Q

And the old man= Trump

I didn't understand the story very well

>>15653545

You won a big win

That's what I said to Radical Qanons

They believe Q is The Antichrist

I told them it was just a test the election is just a test

They can't be patient

but you can

I also think that Q is the shadow presidency

We ask God to heal you

>>15656943

>>15656823

>>15656701

>>15656627

>>15654585

>>15654063

>>15653545

The META thread is for the discussion of board matters.

Plz discuss general matters in the General thread.

Don't want to delete extraneous posts but thread needs to stay on topic.

>>15660208

Don't be a jerk, Ram.

You know damn well that both 8bit and FJ each got a TY from Q while the new BO never has.

>>15657451

>meta thread for discussing board issues

>>15660208

this is for a great baker - but really, the entire bakery

>>15660365

>new BO never has

true enough. maybe next month….

>>15660505

>need new material

yep.

is me not getting Q'd in one month when Q's not posting really a board topic?

KEK.

>>15661079

That was not a very Witty move by your BV.

But, on the bright side, your admin didn't step in it nearly as bad as Trudeau's just did.

Let anons be anons and whoever has a stick up their ass about Papi would you hurry up and shit it? Papi is joyful and fun and you screwballs have soured it and made it distasteful to even talk about. WTF? Quit beating on Papi.

ASS took Comms down because they were doing shit exactly like they're doing now. Comms thinks it was all ASS and it wasn't. Comms gave ASS the opening and continued to make mistake after mistake. I'll give it to you straight. This board is about the anons, not the janitorial staff. Jim took his time on making the split with OSS. Jim won't make that mistake a 2nd time. I'm out your hair. I'm just some anon that bakes now. Good luck.

>>15663999

It's ok if you don't want to bake.

Baking is an honor, not a chore.

>>15664088

Banners are for the board, not for the bakers.

>>15664262

Virtue signal received

You are cleared to fuck off

>>15664293

And you are cleared to post elsewhere.

Stick to generals if you can't be civil.

>>15664312

How about you faggots stop gaslighting us and let us post what the fuck we want?

>>15660365

I like him I guess

worthy of thanks for continue his services too

>>15664262

this all day every day

Whiners need their asses whipped by their great grandfathers who created that image they're fake fighting over.

anyone who says "this is why I left" but continues to complain clearly only cares about either destroying this board or themselves.

>>15667050

BAKER STRIKE - DAY 2

Enjoy the EBakes.

Maybe a scab Baker will show up soon.

>>15667119

KYS

no flips

You don't deserve to bake here you fucking communist

HowDAREyou put yourself about the mission?

>>15667257

>>15667406

>Spam reported

>End of discussion.

>>15666167

mp4 thread, right?

DONE.

>>15667319

you lost, planefag?

;)

>>15667390

You're alright, Doge

it's the rest of the world that's fucked up.

o7