/qresearch/ - Q Research

…and the beat goes on….

https://youtu.be/bS3O5zg290k

https://archive.ph/wip/cL6sk /web/20220127070723/https://8kun.top/qresearch/res/13699736.html

A'''rchive of previous Meta thread

'''Saved due to change in board ownership, interesting discussions.

>>15472771

I believe that was part 1 and part 2 of a long list of notables for bread 19536.

>>15472813

Ahh. Thanks!

How do bakers check stuff to see if it had been previously noted? Just scan links in dough to make sure no repeat or go further back?

>>15472956

basically yeah, try to read notables prior to baking, this will help you to know what has been notabled already.

>>15473921

Hey Veteran 👋

>>15474098

ty anon, not a vet. pa was marine in viet.

tried to get in, no HS diploma at the time.

BO/BV

Had an issue arise today

Baker in kitchen requested handoff.

I accepted, but after i accepted the baker gave me slack, thinking i was OSS or what?

He rescinded the offer after i took confirmation.

We can not have this type of chaos

when a baker request handoff, its first come first served, no retracting less a 911 emergency situation was reason for the handoff.

>>15474057

>>15474057

>>15474057

Please advise.

Anons It's time to Push

You have to break the chains

Phase 3 then Justice

Phase 3 = control of Congress

Rino's is your Target

Future Marker

let's the memes ready

>>15474553

hi doc, yeah was some BS

there is no other person, that was me IPHOP cuz the nigger filtered upon handoff request.

Yeah maybe we do need name tags around here.

>>15474553

*Doc/Chiro

>>15473931

there was another doc before me and I don't know what happened to him, so I guess I'll use chiro, but I don't mind if you call me doc, as long as you know you can associate chiro with my id. I prefer not to change my tag like you do. I'd rather just say it when necessary so people who need to know who I am know who I am.

already reported above

>>15472813

Anyone know when the movie comes out?

;)

Call me Bourne

Jason Bourne

Just landing here months ago

Always The last person on the train

Fact vs fiction

>>15474364

>Rino's is your Target (Anons Know)

So was thinking of creating a thread for that. main concern is self destructing material.

content has a life span of what 4-5 days before its deleted. we need some long haul operations running and this does not work for that.

thoughts?

muh thread on rinos; already content is gone

This thread has been archived? why is that?

https://8kun.top/qresearch/res/15416833.html

>>15474307

>>15474307

>I accepted, but after i accepted the baker gave me slack, thinking i was OSS or what?

sounds like DOGBERG

he knows you're not OSS, that is a gimmick he does

>>15474571

>>15475193 (OB)

I prefer not to namefag. To me, changing your name from anonymous to anything else is namefagging. I'm willing to let other bakers, BO, BV know who I am, but I prefer they follow me by my posting style, ID, chat thread after I ID myself once. If BO isn't ok with this he needs to let me know.

I baked a decent amount the month leading up to 1/6. At the time there was drama over a baker named Grvl. I didn't really have an opininon, but I conflicted with a baker that might have been Grvl. Honestly I try not to decipher the bullshit so I don't really know and my memory isn't 100% on all of it. All I know is there was conflict then like there is now and 'grvl' was involved. If that's you, and the people bitching at me weren't pretending to be you (that is, if it was really you) then this isn't the first time we met.

>>15475166

it's bullshit when a baker does this. He's not the only baker I've seen doing it, but IMO anyone accusing other bakers of being some named negative thing on the main boards should be punished by BO. all that drama could just as easily be required to take place here and only here where it doesn't add to the bullshit bakers need to decipher.

>>15475313

let OSS Bake, just watch his notables and Dough Fuckery.

You will know an anon by their work.

I know he is upset, wouldnt you be.

he is good with graphics and lines, Q noted that

He is Chaos good imo.

still a dick tho. definitely power went to head?

>if u take meds, make sure you do.

>>15475329

>main issue, keeping 8kun OG information out of dough. causing anon division to create new threads.

I don't even know what this means

>member that time OSS banned me for replacing the missing Warfare content back into the dough… anon does.

no. sorry. this is an example of the drama I try to avoid, and when there's drama a lot of times I won't even look at the attached images, especially if it in any way resembles some of the complex nonsense drama-lovers like to post. To me they seem like slides intended to take valuable time away from bakers/others. Maybe I'm too quick to throw what may be legit material proving a point by the way side, but it's the only way I can stay sane.

I'd like to think I'm nice to anyone who's nice or neutral. I will filter anyone who insists on pissing me off, even if they're a baker. I'm also likely to tell constant complainers to go fuck themselves, even when I'm baking. I try to use logic and reasoning first because it's good manners, it's what anons do, and it exposes those who don't.

I have no hard feelings to you or doge or anyone else for that matter. Doge apologized to me yesterday and, for now, I'll assume he meant it.

Friendly fire isn't. War is hell. Adapt or die. Godspeed.

>>15475362

Again, drama I avoid, so I DON'T EVEN KNOW WHO OSS IS

>>15475463

>OSS

last bo admin, he was baker became BV

>>15475329

I do like tools for diggers.

>>15475497

is he baker now?

>>15475486

reported

Are we reporting these links to cp AS cp?

>>15475460

>>main issue, keeping 8kun OG information out of dough. causing anon division to create new threads.

>I don't even know what this means

The main dough war was keeping the section "Information Warfare" in the dough.

OSS and Genesis Anon took it out of the dough long ago. I have been fighting with them till this day. or since NEW BO took over.

"They" were hiding the Information warfare section from the dough, this caused anons to create new threads just for it [DIVISION], I created board /warroom/ just for them.

tryin not to lose frens in the many threads of the catalog.

>hope this helps C

>>15475531

yep reported as soon as they drop or seen

>>15475313

it's just a way to screw up the board

should be discouraged somehow

>>15475362

BO made a rule that OSS cant bake but shills are using it to sabotage breads. I have not seen anyone do this yet but DOGE.

>>15475521

No OSS is currently SPAM HATTING the board.

look for all the jewish rhetoric in red, or the beat downs against bakers.

kek, hes got targets, ill give him that one.

how to keep focus on JOO DS not bakers?

I mean watch the bakers too, dont get me wrong. but yeah too much resources for his IQ to be set on bakers. imo

>>15475550

>DOGE

nah i dont think doge is sabotaging the board either,

dodge took upon himself to vet bakers o short notice.

should have stated that prior to looking for a handoff (ANON DONT LIKE SURPRISES)

Im ok with vetting, but a GREAT WAY TO DO THAT DODGE IS ASK FOR PRIOR ID AND CHECK THEIR POSTINGS

or use Baker Name fagging.

thinks im oss, dafuQ!

>>15475580

>>15475561

>>15475521

>>15475550

how does one know who OSS is? Is that part of the drama?

>>15475580

I've been watching him for a while and I'm quite sure he is, that nigger is constantly trying to start fires.

One namefaggot is starting drama every time he bakes, and the solution is to give him more leverage? No, that is a terrible idea.

>>15475617

{$Work_To_Get_Here == '#WorkTogether'};

>>15475617

well, there are many anons who hate jews, like me, who arent OSS and are sick and tired of being called OSS for saying what we think.

>>15475625

if you are seeing this more than i anon, then yes speak up. i dont really watch the bakers. to busy baking or anonning <-trust me cat its a word

>start collecting caps for proof.

>>15475638

nothing against an anons way.

i was just pointing out his main focus

bakers and jews

bashing jews im ok with

bashing bakers, not so much

>>15475617

>u can tell who OSS is by his MO

>Jew Bashing and Baker Bashing

Why does this seem like 10% of the UIDs when I'm baking?

>>15475638

I don't agree with the sentiment but Idoagree with the notion there are a chunk of these anons who were here long before I was. BV already knows this about me by now though.

G, notice Doge didn't handoff to me either, after offering to hand off. It's not just you. I'm ok with that, but it didn't go unnoticed.

>>15475660

>Why does this seem like 10% of the UIDs when I'm baking?

kek, only 10%

CALL FOR A REPOLL

>>15475669

again dodge has his reason, just this anon dont like surprise and doge is like

doge - baker, handoff

me - ok i got you

doge - (Surprises I want this, this and this.)

MF^&*(*^&*^^*&

Dont waste my time.

this is not a game.

so yeah a bit upset, but move forward.

plenty of shit to do besides bake.

>>15475657

true, OSS mostly uses jew to attack the kitchen and admin

The only baker I ever attack is DOGBERG and he always starts it by CALLING ME OSS

>>15476194

kek yeah yeah…

>>15476341

>kek yeah yeah…

It was just sitting there and wouldn't go away.

Serious question, though; is there an established procedure to have past bans reviewed? I've several BS bans from OSS,

and one from Yoga Pig that I would like to contest.

BV

I made a new thread >>15476532

This from the images for Q Proofs Thread I got from archive.org

Can the new thread be pinned and locked?

BO

I made a new thread >>15476532

This from the images for Q Proofs Thread I got from archive.org

Can the new thread be pinned and locked?

>>15472771

notables that wouldn't fit on one page

gotta have unique id's for each block

>>15472956

Read thru pb notes

but to be sure, use qresear.ch

>>15477015

bakers don't always have that kind of time.

>>15477067

>>15477015

I've done that from time to time when something recommended for notable looks familiar though.

>>15474057

this is doge trying to protect the bake i assume. but not too popular with other bakers, right? don't know him much but a bit of a character to be sure…..

TBH, if it were me, i would just do as he asked: do notes for a couple hundred. Then ask for the bake again. why not? (hard if he's not your cup of tea but important to at least try to cooperate)

interesting that this tactic - whether liked or not - has the effect of making anons think about how shills like oss get in there: because they will never had the patience to do this.

if it were me, i would just do as he asked: do notes for a couple hundred. Then ask for the bake again. why not?

what is interesting is that this tactic - whether liked or not: it has the effect of making anons think about how shills like oss get in there: because they will never had the patience to do this.

>>15474307

>>15477111

>>15474553

You also offered to take the bake. But could note instead then ask again.

>>15474568

>name tags

useful for discussions, bc when it comes to baking, each baker has unique ideas about how it should be. some want long notes, some want short. this and that. helps get to the crux of various disagreements so we can pinpoint the core of someone's objections and find solutions.

>>15474571

You are right - Chiro better since baker Doc has been around for years

scenario:

baker who scrapes own notes and posts war-and-peace buns offers bake to someone he approves of if they'll first notetake.

baker who does anon-nom notables posts 2-3 notes at 300.

What are the chances this baker has proven himself worthy to baker war-and-peace by doing this?

let me guess: only one way to find out

…

>>15477156

what if anon-nom baker uses war-and-peace baker scrape style, gets bake and then reverts to anon-nom baker style. Is war-and-peace baker upset? Betrayed? What's the message for the boards?

Just throwing it out there.

Also talking too much right now so I'll back out for awhile.

BV, BO, and bakers alike are much appreciated by this baker.

>>15475279

sgrvl/gerbil is definitely a character.

what can i say??

>>15475279

ps I am not gerbil

>>15477191

I assumed you were BO

>>15477152

will give it a shot tomorrow if he does it again and see if it's an exercise in humility or futility…

or both.

>>15475166

>>15475166

>>15475313

dunno bakers well enough to judge, bakers had to go underground on QR unless they wanted to get picked off by oss. so are now just 'resurfacing' a little.

over time, it becomes clear whether someone is a "character" (quirky), a lone wolf, or a shill. Time will tell.

>>15475362

the problem with oss baking is that his notables are shit, and not wanted by anyone. Hence, banned. He may bake, but his notes if crappy, can be thrown out if anons next bread don't like them. Next baker is free to edit or grab the dough from oss (if BVs are there, they can help pin him down). "Bad notes" include board politics, muh joos, other nasties, irrelevant filler, unsauced stuff, non-news.

>>15475535

is Baqer G gerbil?

this speaks to a larger issue about the dough

it's "slimmed down" at the moment

not my doing or admin's, happened months ago

makes baking easier as much of the reference info is ignored by anons (to be honest)

but should we still have it prominentally displayed in the dough each bread?

IDK

but not a simple question, not black and white

can be discussed more but can't do everything at once

meanwhile, important that we have ONE DOUGH

no bread splits

anons hate them, bakers hate them, often it just the one splitting who wants the split

officially, any split (except to avoid oss bake) won't be supported by BVs

signed in baker is authorized baker

time to boot famewhore baker. more concerned about racking up post counts and spamming ignorant filter posts.

>>15475580

>vetting on short notice

short notice can be a problem, nobody likes sudden change, kek

>>15475617

>talk it out with oss?

could fill a book - a fat one - with baker efforts to talk it out with oss

just look at baker meta thread on comms

time for talk ended long ago

>>15475657

whatever your beliefs about jews or anybody, when they are bashed on this board, it reflects on Q.

that's why it's discouraged and if spammed, is deleted.

>>15475660

10% of iuds are jew bashing

yep - could delete the individual jabs but it's like dandelions in the grass

>>15475813

there have always been bakers who don't get along

but if there is a core group who CAN get along, this will help

espec if these are the ones who bake daily or close to it

>>15476401

go to /tech/

>>15476982

>>15476982

think it's already been pinned, dunno about locked

>>15477067

>>15477015

>bakers sometimes have no time to check qresear.ch or read thru pb notables

daytime breads were always a problem when Q posted

breads are much slower now, it's good for bakers to at least PERUSE pb notables

i always have except when grabbing a bread @200 or more - then all bets are off!

Can also ask when posting notes if anons see dups

lotta eyez out there….

>>15477156

>baker who does anon-nom notables posts 2-3 notes at 300

>is he worthy?

this "anon nommed notables" thing has been goin on forever

much like the "anons should learn to bake" thing

short answer to your question is PROBABLY NO-unless baker is also a fan of "anon-nommed notables only"

Whatever anyone thinks anons OUGHT to do -

anons will do what they WANT to do, and there will be a general "sense" of what the group as a whole wants and is capable of.

>>15477464

con't.

GENERALLY (imo):

- Anons are VERY GOOD at finding news from alt-news sources

- Anons are VERY GOOD at calling out poor or non existent sauce

- Autist anons can be VERY GOOD at linking current events to Q posts or to @45 actions/EOs/etc.

- Analytical anons can be VERY GOOD at bringing together info from diverse sources and looking at its implications. This is deep level research, and is often discussed by anons in illuminating ways - ironically often OVERLOOKED by bakers because it's harder to evaluate (espec if it's not baker's area of expertise).

BUT

- Anons are not particularly interested in board politics except as it affects their ability to dig or meme.

- Most do not want to bake - they are smart enough to know how to stay outta harm's way.

- Many lack the skill to note bc schools are so shitty at teaching objective writing now (it's all "journaling"). Can help that by providing info on how to note (and for anons, on how to post) - forthcoming.

- Most like the baker to pick up 'currents events' articles that are timely and relevent but not 'special' enough to be called out as notable (it's TEDIOUS to call out meat-and-potatoes fare that way, it's still decent news that needs to get out)

SO

we may say "anons must nom"

but so far, it hasn't happened

Don't let the IDEAL destroy the REAL.

muy 2 cents worth

>>15477484

Baker id can be handled by bakers

Shill id can ONLY be handled by admins

Should ALL of the power to decide who bakes be in the hands of admins?

>>15477400

>go to /tech/

ty

>>15477523

>reference material

One way or another, there will DEFINITELY be a place for reference material - and anons will be consulted about it

I tried a coupla times as anon to get bakers to put back pages 3 and 4 in Dec when i noticed they were "missing"

Still don't know who made the decision and how it was made

I like reference material but i am a digger

Also spend a coupla weeks once going thru the dough, so i know what's there

but for a long time, for over a year, it was just a huge mass of data to me - so i see the problem with "wall of reference data" - but also like to have certain things at hand. For example, HOW TO BAKE AND EBAKE.

The priority when arriving was to develop a uniform dough upon which most could agree. The comments i saw indicated overall agreement but needs to be revisited, that was in the first few days of new admin. Things like this are done in stages. So we could consider the present dough to be conditional.

What i like or what bakers like has to be looked at from anon pov too. Anon-centered approach, helps to unify the work. (i mean really anon centered not just the rhetoric.)

>>15477585

ha ha

looks like that was literally one of the last - but there were MANY straws before

OSS was a respected baker in winter 2020. A little rigid but competant and accepted by other bakers. Then he started criticizing in weird ways (no evidence) - going after several bakers using his recopied posts ("muh graphics"). Then a frontal attack with red text - beaten back by facts and so defeated.

At start of May, he "apologizes" and claims nervous breakdown, oh so sorry to have stabbed 4 of 5 bakers in the back, just tired. KEK. Then comes back two months later for the coup de gras. Snake like, cannot negotiate with that.

>>15475813

>OSS mostly uses jew to attack the kitchen and admin

>The only baker I ever attack is DOGBERG

>and he always starts it by CALLING ME OSS

>DOGBERG

>OSS mostly uses jew to attack the kitchen and admin

Wow, that"s crazy

>>15477660

Good point re filtering but how do you know at top of bread handoff who is offering to bake?

>Baker should be allowed to choose who they handoff to

always

Yup.

Why we need coverage - bc otherwise, baker must eventually GHOST. And anyone can pick it up. There have been many interesting graveyard bakes as a result. KEK.

Admins can support good baking but it would be good to see a kitchen that can mostly support itself. Kitch used to be a counterpoint to admin, which is why FJ admins always talked about "bakers union" - to weaken the kitch so admins could control completely.

>>15477660

One thing we need: a bin that has info on baker's work, on recent bakes, etc. Pastebin and Q-bin had that and i used it to track my own work. Used Q-bin to get info on coverage, when bakers are needed, etc.

The apps currently used (controlc and fullchan) are basic, need coder(s) who could flesh out fullchan (it's open source and in house, so that's a start).

Did you see what i said about your asking anons to post notes? I would just post notes. But i have to say, since bakers all have different approaches to notes, even good notetakers might not like the prospect of having their decisions dissected in public.

It made people think tho. Dunno what u wanna do in the future, we haven't yet got a way worked out yet to make it easier to see 'sup. And wont for a while. But it is much better than even a week ago. Getting better all the time.

>>15477825

The problem is Trust.

How are you going to work together if you dont trust one another. DODGE, OSS

I trust when i handoff to whomever they are doing gods work, we have a BO and many BVS that can be called upon if they are not doing gods work.

What as the downfall of the LA drug cartels.

They dint trust one another.

DODGE STOP SELF NOTING, THATS ANONS WORK

OSS STFU ABOUT BO AND BAKERS AND TAKE IT TO TWITTER

>>15477751

>Good point re filtering but how do you know at top of bread handoff who is offering to bake?

My only ideas would be for Baker to plan ahead and make the request during the last bread they have time to bake, so it can be picked up in "top of next bread" fashion via basic comms to whoever called it.

And in the event the kitchen has to go ghost, I think we just need more comms to and from anon that we all need to be on top of our callouts.

Nothing wrong with an ebake IMO.

When I'm well rested I can go above and beyond when I scrape a pb (ctrl+f for other terms like @, sauce, proof, dasting, relevent topics, etc) when there's not many noms.

I just refuse to tolerate this "anon noms only baker" fag bullshit

It's a slide

>>15477823

Why are you so AGAINST idea of a baker who isn't (you) having a say in who they handoff to,IF YOU DON'T HAVE AN AGENDA?

>>15477823

Den of Absolute Ritards = DOAR

i had to ask, too

>if it was me, i would rqst last bread id /s

how does the baker know it's yours?

(probably in your case, bc of the 'special dough'! but dough is spozed to be uniform, ha ha - so SHOULDN'T work, right?)

Support for namefagging -

not the first time for that discussion is it?

(your cue to laugh)

>>15477823

Suppose i say we are moving in the right direction but need some time.

Whaddya say?

HaHa

Spam the forum to remove anon comments and wishes. Nice. Further information on who, why and what.

>>15477843

>great, now we waste another 1/4 bread trying to find out who the baker is? (here, u 5 take this test for me) that wont work anons. causes chaos real quick.

i pretty much just spelled it out for you anon, are you paying attention?

>>15477850

>Den of Absolute Ritards = DOAR

ah gotcha tyvm

>>15477850

Suppose i say we are moving in the right direction but need some time.

I see we are, jsut a few hiccups along the way.

i have np vetting, np dough changes.

short notice and surprises not so much

>standing by

>>15477840

I don't agree with G sperging and that has to stop but I agree with G in principle. Doge is out of control, anons have to be engaged in love and Bakers have to tow BO line.

G is not wrong. Reel it in G. Almost all agree with you.

>>15477840

>DODGE STOP SELF NOTING, THATS ANONS WORK

Bakers are either anon, or shill.

THAT'S A FACT.

Retard.

Your divisionfagging is weak.

And obvious.

Are you saying now that bakers aren't allowed to submit their own notables?

Because it's against da rules to self nom?

Seriously, go fuck yourself, hall monitor faggot.

You were also the only baker OSS allowed after chasing everyone else out.

And here you are claiming to not be part of OSS.

CRINGEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

>>15477885

*toe

>>15477885

>I agree with G in principle. Doge is out of control

OH SHIT OH SHIT OH SHIT

HERE WE GO

MANUFACTURED CONSENSUS

HEY ONION, YOU IN HERE?

PLEASE BREAK OUT YOUR SHILL HANDBOOK AND TELL US WHICH CHAPTER THIS IS FROM

>>15477896

The doge breads are all about doge. That's the problem. Doge can't get out of doge's own way.

>>15477914

heaven forbid anons agree on something.

>>15477840

Trust develops over time.

When bakers cooperate to work out differences, trust grows.

Tolerance is necessary as well because bakers are by nature independent thinkers (so are BOs).

Strong opinions mean tolerance is a challenge.

You had strong opinions about namefagging, but your opinion changed due to experience. To understand that our present opinion may not be ….hmmm…optimal - that's helps us to cooperate with others with different opinions.

Another example - you mentioned BAKERS SELF NOTING

On big boards like QR, competition for space in notables is high. Since bakers have a 'competitive advantage' self noting is discouraged.

On smaller boards, the diggers ARE the bakers. Digger collects the notes and bakes them, maybe with help, maybe not.

So really depends on the situation i think.

Saw a baker ask anons if ok to self-nom yesterday - looked at his post, seemed good so i nommed.

Like the idea of RULES OF THUMB rather than just RULES (at least for most things).

>>15477866

Oh so now you're concerned about what's eating up the bread, while simultaneously advocating anon noms only so you don't have to look at the bread beyond a ctrl-f function.

I think I'm beginning to see why a faggot like you would be payrolled to post here,

YOU'RE LITERALLY TOO LAZY FOR A REAL JOB

LMFAO

>>15477924

This us literally all you got?

WEAK

Next shill please

>>15477918

>>15477962

>The doge breads are all about dog

Meant to reply to this BS

Not your other BS

>>15477896

>Bakers are either anon, or shill.

disagree

i dunno who is posting and don't wanna know

but look at your post

all emotion - pissed off

not down with that, plz cool off b4 you post here

this is about discussion not blaming

>>15477914

I'd delete this but it's a good example of what we don't want in a discussion thread.

these too

>>15477950

>>15477962

>>15477969

Go cool off

Stop posting now.

- BO

Gotta go, company soon.

if i come back and find a big fight, not gonna make anybody's day.

look at the thread above -

good discussions

that's what we're about

WHERE WE GO ONE WE GO ALL.

- OUT

>>15477971

>pissed off

Goddamn right

>i dunno who is posting and don't wanna know

I'm saying in terms of volition, they are either doing Gods work, or they are here to disrupt it.

Not talking about individual identities, it's an anonymous board, we are all anonymous (obviously)

bakerG is controlled opposition

i am prepared to die on this hill

Doge is a good baker as far as final product, it's just really messy getting there. I'm not criticizing doge to hurt doge. I'm criticizing doge to help doge be a better baker.

>>15477537

> Most like the baker to pick up 'currents events' articles that are timely and relevent but not 'special' enough to be called out as notable

is this how the practice of screencapping articles so anons didn't have to leave the boards to read went by the wayside?

>>15477660

>There isABSOLUTELY NO POINTin have a baker dictate "anon noms only"

>This leaves the door open for gatekeeping cherrypicker shills to control the flow of information.

I've tried to get you explain this logic and consistently refuse. IMO that's nonsense: 'anon-only' = gatekeeping but baker only = the right way. on what planet is this a logical assessment?

>>15477823

>(here, u 5 take this test for me) that wont work anons. causes chaos real quick.

me either honestly, but that goes back to the same freedom of choice. Bakers have it, signed in or out, imo, as long as the chain of custody is properly maintained. When it's broken, that's bad. When it's broken by a baker over personal preference/ baker conflict, that's blasphemy, imo.

>>15477825

>even good notetakers might not like the prospect of having their decisions dissected in public.

>>15477843

>I just refuse to tolerate this "anon noms only baker" fag bullshit

>It's a slide

Your mom's a slide. I do good work. You apologized and said I was right. Was that BS? imo, that's a rhetorical question.

had to stop here. Will read the rest when I get back from IRL.

>>15478361

what the jew is saying is other jews could nom themselves with sockpuppet IDs and contest anon noms

but then, if a baker is stopping this, what if the baker is one of the shills too, he could put all the secret shil notables

this is retarded and makes people not want to bake

>>15478361

>This leaves the door open for gatekeeping cherrypicker shills to control the flow of information.

>I've tried to get you explain this logic

>and consistently refuse.

First of all, who the fuck are you?

Second I just did several times in this thread, but I will again

Because in a situation where it was not just a ploy to keep notables anorexic and lacking

the end result would be no different than if an anon came back later to scrape

WHY "BAKE" IF YOU'RE NOT GONNA COLLECT NOTABLES?????

Because you want information to fall by the wayside, that's why

This goes beyond laziness, or MuH AnOn ColLeCtEd AlL tHe NoTes

It's censorship in disguise

>Your mom's a slide

Sauce?

>You apologized and said I was right.

Sauce?

>>15478486

If anons and a baker can't figure out a post is a shill post, or whatever paranoid thing anyone is worried about,and refuse it or request it be pulled, this board is worrhless. How could anyone take this seriousl??? It's projection at its finest.

-phonefagging chiro

>>15478643

exactly

>>15478616

he's the noter/baker you keep disrespecting for no good reason

why did you say sorry to him, and thenin the same thread you were piling on with the OSS people?

Bakers should be eccentric schizo autists who see the scope of what we are doing here, and realize than in QR 22, where we are at a precipice of consciousness AND censorship, WE SHOULD BE DOING EVERYTHING WE CAN TO ARCHIVE, AND SHARE AS MUCH RELEVENT INFORMATION AS POSSIBLE.

Not a bunch of minimalist lazy faggots who want anons to do the job of a baker with such drive

I understand the scope of what we're doing, and the extent to which we're winning, and we still need to push. That's why I'm willing to literally abandon IRL responisbilities and hobbies to read and evaluate nearly every post in a bread as either dasting it not, all fuckn day. If you don't have the drive, don't bake. I don't see why you would want to, anyways. Unless of course you're a DOAR fag payrolled to infiltrate and disrupt our progress however possible - such as implimenting minimalist norms that enable complacency and a false sense of accomplishment.

ALSO, that would be gate FLOODING or some other name, NOT gateKEEPING because more would get in, not less.

>>15478688

>why did you say sorry to him, and thenin the same thread you were piling on with the OSS people?

Again, sauce?

Also, how is this relevent unless you're just here to be a contrarian?

What are you advocating exactly?

>sounds like DOGBERG

Besides MUH JOOing?

>>15478726

you're a shill and a namefag and you call everybody DOAR.

Am I DOAR, bluntwrap? or just when I'm baking.

>>15478739

you want me to dig it up, kike? just say the word.

>>15478643

>If anons and a baker can't figure out a post is a shill post, or whatever paranoid thing anyone is worried about,and refuse it or request it be pulled, this board is worrhless

Yeah cuz it's all about the shills right?

Not the information, keep the focus on shills and division

Got it!

>>15478747

>Am I DOAR, bluntwrap? or just when I'm baking.

Since you're calling me by the name of my burner account to keeps tabs on you DOAR fags, yeah I'd say theres a good chance you're a DOAR fag!

>>15478753

>you want me to dig it up, kike? just say the word.

the word!

>>15478768

>burner

so you say, and then lie about me being there with you

you posted the screenshots yourself you rat bastard. want me to get those too?YOU ARE THE DOARFAG

>>15478768

A wall of links to news articles with no real filter or thought is NOT information. There are 5 or so decent non-Q aggregators folks can go to for that bullshit. I argue it's the opposite. Shills can easily flood notables with so much worthless content no one gives AF about them any more. I'd take the other side of this coin more seriously if doge wasn't making the argument as he's doing a lousy job trying.

>>15478779

Oh look, moar gaslighting and literal projection.

JFC

Go spam the general with MuH JoOs, You're better at that

Adults are trying to have a discussion here

>>15478795

>I argue it's the opposite. Shills can easily flood notables with so much worthless content no one gives AF about them any more

Bullshit, WHY ARE YOU HERE IF YOU DON'T CARE ABOUT NOTABLES?

Seriously this has to be one of the funniest narratives you guys try to use.

>>15478737

Weird how yall were okay with two page notables for the past six months, but as we start having good breads again you want there to be less notables.

Very weird.

>>15478813

Zero respect for differing opinions among bakers. BO likes big notes and he and I are just fine. Supports argument you're here to cause problems, imo. Board needs bakers though, even ones like doge… i guess.

>>15478853

I was not here for past 6 months.

What did board look like when Q was here? How were things done then,

>>15478886

Think about it…

The way things were when this place was at its best and most relevant and everyone went out their way to create tools to pump us out to the world…

That's now somehow gatekeeping and if you disagree you must be a shill.

Really?

REALLY?!

>>15478873

>Zero respect for differing opinions among bakers.

I have plenty of respect for people who aren't trying to smear me and hoodwink the operation.

But all the bakers in question wanna do is call me a nigger, or a jew, or a shill.

Very compelling.

>BO likes big notes and he and I are just fine

Exactly, 8kun isn't gonna run out of harddrive space.

Anons want substance.

Not censorship.

>I was not here for past 6 months.

>What did board look like when Q was here?

I was not here when Q was here, I've been here for the past 6 months.

Maybe that's why I don't see the logic in reverting to an old norm from a different setting when the game has changed!

>>15478923

>That's now somehow gatekeeping and if you disagree you must be a shill.

That or extremely gullible!

>>15478923

>The way things were when this place was at its best and most relevant and everyone went out their way to create tools to pump us out to the world…

I would also like to add, this place is now in the position to be at it's best again, we have the tools, we have the playbooks, we have the maps. We just need individuals who are willing to PRODUCE.

Not sit back and let fucking shills scrape for us because they convinced us it's somehow better that way

>>15478933

I've never called you or anyone else any of those things.

You can't deflect like that with me.

>>15478971

>(1)

So you're a baker who's opinion I didnt respect?

What's the opinion?

And which baker are you?

>>15478753

I mixed up the ID's there, kek. I gave the wrong guy shit because I thought he was you. >>15478813

>Oh look, moar gaslighting and literal projection.

here you are saying you were on DOAR a few posts ago: >>15478768

You posted screengrabs in /qr/ when you were doing your kyafabe with OSSBERG,you were in DOARnot anyone else here, and you're the one always calling everyone DOARFAG. That's what projecting is and you're the one who does it,that's why they call you jew.I dont even have a discord, stupid nigger.

>>15478994

>and then one day for no reason

>>15479011

I thought you were gonna dig it up?

I'm waiting

>>15478994

Chiro.

Id changes from phonefagging out and about? Idk

>>15479028

I will if he doesnt when i grt home, if you're serious

>>15479031

And what's your argument again?

That I'm just here to cause problems?

Or that I apologised to you for something?

What was the opinion?

>>15479040

Same bread or just before BO asked baker to add to globals and was told no rudely… you know… right after I handed off to you… it was before the handoff you suddenly got reasonable and one thing you said was I was right and you were wrong and you were sorry.

>>15479058

This is shill bullshit. I'm not wasting my time with you anymoar. GFY

>>15479072

>refuses to answer my questions

>gaslights me some more

You should have went with politics instead of forum sliding.

Similiar stuff, but it seems like you're all passion and no talant.

At the very least, very usual, due to being such an idiot

Bye bye! See ya next hop

>>15479066

I recall being rude to the baker I recieved handoff from, and waiting to do so until after I got the handoff, so that I could secure the dough from what I percieved to be a team of gatekeeping shills.

I do not remember apologising though, as I wouldnt be sorry for that

>>15479114

>very usual

Useful*

As in, a useful idiot

>>15479120

how would you rate your chemistry with the rest of the kitchen?

>>15479147

it seems that you're constantly fighting everyone and being a jew

>>15479184

keep squirming jewboy.

Are you better than us?

What did you mean by that picture?

>>15479204

Out of respect for BO's thread, I humbly decline your offer to troll further.

I think I've said all that needs to be said.

Good day, DOAR fag

>>15479238

fys bluntwrap

>>15479327

respect the BO, mr bluntwrap

>>14841908 OB

A LOT of spam here, fyi

>>15479823

whoever smelt it

faggot

>>15477999

Suppose you're right. Not saying you are.

But this is true: Unless you have evidence, all accusing others does is to create confusion and disunity. Don't like someone and can't prove anything? Stay away from them. Others have done. Nobody's special.

>>15475638

>there are many anons who hate jews, like me

Q is not against jews

if you are, that's your business.

Keep it to yourself if you want to be part of the discussion.

if you have a beef with a baker, work it out or stay apart. Think of the bigger goal.

>>15481559

>>15481718

both mine.

"Let's make baker admin without considering critical viewpoints of the admin especially on court record!"

>This is what is going on right now. We should be digging on what comes from this, and BO is triggered by the idea of truth.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=829ZZFxvMUw

If you cannot stand to hear a view that is contrary to that one that has been accepted by you, then I feel bad for you, son. Surely you would agree that this kind of digging must take place upon the suggestion of integration into the process, right?

Should we never question the new hire? I know what BO thinks about it. >>15468518

Does this really make sense?

Hell, he even uses the wrong meme to imply I'm talking about hotwheels and not 2ch, he can't even consider the critical viewpoint, when it matters most.

proposed rules of thumb for baking

may eliminate some squabbling over what is right

thoughts? anything left out?

Some Rules of Thumb for Baking and Note-taking

Biggest rule is USE COMMON SENSE.

RETURNING BAKERS

QR needs more bakers. But if you haven't been here in a while, plz LURQ MOAR to get familiar with changes since you left.

Board has gone thru a lot, anons too. Those who stuck it out deserve some respect.

Some things need to change, but not everything and not everything at once.

"Don't push the river."

ALL BAKERS

Shill bakes are pretty easy to peg: baker leaves, no notables, bad notables, anon protests ignored by baker, baker making unauthorized dough changes

Good bakes are harder bc every bakers has a different idea about what's best.

Key points:

* Be as tolerant as you can manage - focus on Q goals, not the lousy personalities of your fellow bakers (KEK)

* Make it REAL CLEAR who has the bread (tie to dough, use FORMATTING, etc.)

* If you have to leave early, say so and seek a replacement; try to avoid leaving after @500-550.

* When leaving wo/replacement, post GHOST BAKE – avoid when possible since shills may pick it up

* Don't split bakes except in emergencies - BVs will usually lock stolen bakes

NOTABLES

Goal: to highlight material that is especially key for defeating the DS, "we are the news"

Specifically:

* recent news articles or other relevant posts that are dated, well-sauced, and easy to find

* videos with titles, dates, and a short description

* insightful anon analyses espec. when tied to Q posts but relevance if the main thing

* reports on military and other traffice (boats, planes, etc.)

* on point satire or cartoons

"GOOD" NOTABLE BUNS

* Each baker has a different style; try to avoid style wars (your style is not the "best" or "only")

* Ideally, go for a balance between 'kitchen sink' and 'anon noms only' - be flexible

* Use concise descriptors (helps with "wall of text" problem)

* If time permits, read pb notables and use qresear.ch to check for dup posts

* Stick to one format on notables dough page so aggregators can pick up

>>15477885 i dont agree with my sperging either, its a knee jerk reaction i have. working on it.

>>15477945 That was me, i was trying to get more people to call out notables, so i asked if one should be noted. I think you gave me the idea earlier last thread. ask for not nom

>>15477950 funny i have been running notables for almost 4 years, now im trying to really get anons involved and you got shit post about. comms closed (knew jerk reaction)

>>15478361 personal preference/ baker conflict, (calling for handoff then rescinded when accepted, yeah thats FOOBAR imo)

>>15478616

>WHY "BAKE" IF YOU'RE NOT GONNA COLLECT NOTABLES????? (So as to get all the fam involved.)

>>15478643 <- hes got a good point (Trust one another)

>>15482076

ty bo reviewing now

>>15482076

How about setting up trip codes for bakers?

Maybe a thread for bakers to check in and out so other bakers now they are around and can easily identify them?

just some thoughts BO.anons

>>15482092

MAYBEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

you could go to another board,

have bakers meet you there and setup tripcodes for them.

then when a baker seeks handoff all they have to do is review the baker thread to see who is tripping?

maybe this could work?

Does 8kun allow trips without giving people access to admin/bv rights?

again i think the easiest way for now to identif patriot bakers is to ask for the last bread id and review their postings, assuming they did post lb.

just some thoughts BO

>>15482081

>>15482092

>>15482092

you're way too fast for me, kek

tripcodes have been discussed, but they make BO/BVs complete gatekeepers, would be better to be adjunct not primary

g'nite, tx for feedback

>>15482092

fuggen comms bakers ideas!

we are infected with that shit now

what to do

doc

>>15482076

this is clear, you might post at the top of next meta thread

>Ideally, go for a balance between 'kitchen sink' and 'anon noms only' - be flexible

yes this is the way

>>15482857

meds. take them.

>>15482907

Gaslighting, get better at it

>>15482903

You sound crazy!

(like this)

>>15483083

go back to DOAR faggot

you're wasting everyone's time

>>15482695

take your meds fren

>>15482076

>* Stick to one format on notables dough page so aggregators can pick up

what dis mean?

>>15482092

this is a HORRIBLE idea imo.

>>15483298

seconded. but not intentionally horrible, at least.

I just grab whatever banner was used last. I see some bakers have personalized. I may have memories of ree over dis.

Dis still issue for bakers?

someone have the OG Q Research banner handy that can share?

Personally, I prefer things the way they were. Easier to spot. Consistent.

Don't care what others bakers do though.

^^^^^^^ neverending waste of everyone's time

>>15483518

^^^^^^^^filtered for wasting precious 8kun harddrive space

>>15481718

>Keep it to yourself if you want to be part of the discussion.

just my 2 cents… will say it once and try not to say it ever again.

This seems counter to what this board stands for- free speech.

Maybe it's because I read the statement about the JQ that was posted in a side thread and linked to notables when I first showed up in late 2018…

Maybe it's because I trained myself to look past it when trying to find relevant information on these boards…

Again, i don't agree with the sentiment

I will say it's fucking weird how untouchable that topic is…

Regardless, here's my biggest beef:

How can you ask us to put up with Doge's bullshit, which is clearly everything you think the jooslide is, and not be willing to put up with an otherwise seemingly great baker just because he won't shut up about the jews?

That's not fair, imo.

If we have to put up with doge's bullshit, you should put up with differing opinions from good help.

Thank you for considering this opinion.

>>15483795

didnotmean to add that link.

>>15483754 OB

>>15483817 OB

Baker's choice.

Just wondering... y no planefag reports?

I'm an anon-nom only baker, but even I always add PF Reports.

>>15483837

Didn't See

Busy news day

o7

>>15483364

>All I did was come back

>>15483474

>You came back? Where did you go?

Oh my bad i thought you were BakerG, Or Gerbil, or whatever OSS is calling themselves today

>>15483298

>>15483405

>Trips for bakers

Agree - not the way to go

>>15483364

"noms only" idea comes up periodically but not for a long time. Not recommended because we cannot FORCE anons to nom - "punishing" them with tiny "nommed only" buns just makes them mad. Therefore impractical.

Thoughts?

>>15483434

>banner changed

First change was to "Qanon" part of banner in response to OSS campaign re "Qanon is not Q". Banner radically changed by Barkeep one night over anon protests, he simply did it because he could. From there, bakers varied the banner. Some versions pretty good, others (imo) were a complete mockery. Once an artist anon tried to restore original banner on the basis of its dignity and aethetics, but didn't happen.

Share your preference for original, whether "Qanon" or "Q". Any baker can use the original; may be better to use "Q" version to avoid needless headaches. Whether we should revert to that would be the question.

Thoughts, bakers?

>>15484193

makes sense.

TY

>>15484324

disagree but you already know that. Dead horse imo to reiterate why (nom-only w/ baker final say good).

Seems stupid to argue about it. If you want to write a fucking novel an publish it in notables instead of Amazon, be my guest. I'm not going to slow up the kitchen complaining about it.

>>15483854

endless pilpul

if anyone was foolish enough to answer these questions, they would instantly be turned into other questions, and those into others, and those into others, days would turn into weeks, and then DOGBERG would say you're OSS.

>>15484324

>Thoughts, bakers?

noms only was effective, it got more anons to call out notes, I think it IS practical for the time being until there is more participation.

baker should choose w/e banner he likes IMO.

>>15483795

>This seems counter to what this board stands for- free speech.

Abusive speech is not free speech. Personal attacks is not free speech. The topic is not untouchable, we can discuss - and you are doing now.

>he won't shut up about the jews

hence my request for him or anyone to focus on baking and board issues here. Goes for everyone. When someone can't shut up about something, that's their problem. It shouldn't be ours.

>>15483854

Let me be blunt: STOP FIGHTING with other bakers. Butthurt bakers fuck things up. Grow up or get out.

>>15484448

Can't argue with any of this.

I meant untouchable in society. It's just fucking weird. Like if you even think about asking about it, you're bashed harder than Trump, Q, anons, far-right, or anything else I've ever seen. Having not been there when it happened and knowing all the other things I was fed, I'm still firm in my belief that Lucifer comped EVERYTHING… I just can't help but wonder if Hitler wasn't created by the Luciferians so folks like me couldn't ask questions 80 years later.

That's all

wut up BO

BV here

like the rules of thumb

trip problem should be taken care of when fullbin up and ready

OSS has nothing to do with free speech whatsoever!

Doge is a good baker, maybe tone down the doge stuffs in his bread but otherwise good, no problems, gerbil is a good baker too, just stay out of the dough we all good

>>15484472

>I'm just defending myself

PROVE IT

STFU ABOUT THE WAY I BAKE

>>15484494

>PROVE IT

lol

>STFU ABOUT THE WAY I BAKE

I'll consider it

>>15484448

>hence my request for him or anyone to focus on baking and board issues here.

ok, I will avoid the topic *while signed in to bake*

if no one eggs me on

however I will note there is a disclaimer at the bottom of every post that my views are not the views of 8kun, what is the purpose of this disclaimer if not to allow free speech? Does it not say explicitly, under every one of my posts, that this is my opinion?

>>15484425

not sure what u are disagreeing with.

>>15484437

>noms only until more participation

Would ask, why must anons nom? They already participate. They willingly dig, meme and pray. But most just don't like the "meta" type stuff like nomming, noting and baking, only crazy bakers. kek.

Imo, efforts to force what one considers virtuous behavior tends to create resistance or reluctant compliance, not transformation.

Who usually noms? Is it anons or off-duty bakers, noters and a handful of oldfags?

>>15484638

I dont know who noms, I always used to do it and I wasn't a baker or oldfag. It's easy to do, compared to baking and scraping through 750 posts, and then the notes are by anons, not by one guy who thinks he knows best.

>>15484638

anon-noms:

1) encourage participation

2) filter out useless info

3) this style seems to bring OGs out of the woodwork. I could be wrong about that, but that's what I think I'm witnessing.

I know you and doge disagree, but for the life of me I can't understand how this doesn't IMPROVE the quality of work.

NO ONE is forcing anyone to do anything. I don't get this argument either. if anons want to do it they'll do it. If baker wants to do it he'll do it.

Honestly both styles can live harmoniously.

If you force anon-nom out, IMO you're at risk of the board being comped by a select few bakers. An active BO can prevent this w/ micromanaging, but some day you're going to want this machine to operate well without much involvement and, when that time comes, you'll pay the price.

>>15484472

>if anon prefers bland uniformity

kekking….

>>15484472

Bakers get attacked all the time. Goes with the territory. Most of us learn how to deal with attacks wo/lashing out. Too much emotion, use reason instead. Develop self-control and patience. Work with what is possible and teach by example.

>>15484718

5 days straight notables and bakes. Baker id's need to be put on the back burner. BO policies are working. Long term - agree with Baker ID's after we get rid of OSS threat. OSS team will use baker id's to harass bakers at this time. I say we go with BO policies, get the board strong again and get a solid cast of bakers first. my 2 cents. BO is a steady hand on the till.

>>15484925

Let me make clearer the baker id thing - I've seen enough of BO to have confidence BO is making the right calls for the good of the board. If BO makes the call for Baker Id's tomorrow I'm 100% supporting BO decision. Since that hasn't happened yet I'm giving the BO the advice that it's too early to uniquely identify the bakers because it the current environment it would be used against them.

BO call and I'll go whichever way BO decides.

>>15484925

>>15484973

goin slow, no problemo

>>15484989

You have anons talking again. That's the main thing. o7 BO

Oh and btw - when META get spammed you know you're over the target.

>>15485001

I dunno what happened while I was gone (jan-jan) but you make it sound like I'm better off for it.

>>15484718

"I am performing timing analysis, critical voice occurs at the same time as other problems we have, therefore ignore facts and evidence voice raises and call voice negative and ignore."

It's a simulacrum in simula of reasoned thought. I agree with you that you desperately require work on temporarily suspending your emotional core lest you erroneously fail to hear evidence and truth. Let me know when you want to address the points with counterpoints or refutations, but until that, it stands that you're acting ridiculous in truth.

Furthermore, the longer it goes on with NO ONE considering the evidence, the more likely I consider staff dupes of a con, of one form or another. Do you not know Anon is more important than any 'falling inline' staff position?

The more triggered by the notion that is proven by japan's court records that Jim stole 2ch and stole the money for the subcontractor hosting, the more suspect it appears that he has just pulled off another theft of a movement. Make sure you do not bite the hand that feeds you, but we Anon are watching closely.

>>15484989

Do you care about Commas?

1 anon is upset about them

>>15485136

have you considered that the USA stole 2chan, which is built around internet, computers and electricity i.e. AMERICAN TECHNOLOGY, and Jim is just the front man?

All Japanese tech is stolen from the US.

>>15485241

Think about what that means for a second. You're willing to excuse his behavior because the possibility that CIA style behavior is behind it? You realize how silly that is to excuse even granting the possibility?

Not only that, but the notion falls apart that Japan stole it from us by nature of us stealing from them first. Are you aware of chan history at all?

>>15485269

no, I'm saying he's just a figurehead for something we have no real insight.

Where did Japan get their computers? Who gave them access to the internet? Who gave the electricity? Have you ever driven a Toyota or used a Honda generator? Their entire car industry was built by coming into our factories, taking photos and replicating them in Japan. They made some deals with the tribe and then came over and stole everything, just like China is doing now. I dont give a rats ass if we stole 2 chan from them, who cares?

>>15485325

It's because it has parallels to current day actions is why, and not the only time either, not the only staff either. Those who fail to learn from history are doomed to leekspin on it again. If you take up the position of apathy to any misbehavior is to fall prey to it. Again, though, you're willing to excuse theft? Leave 10% for the Big Guy.

>>15485376

I'm not at all versed on the topic, but that notion is bullshit and dangerous. Only 1 was perfect.

God uses the broken, the insecure, and the unlikely.

>>15485386

>In which he explains how criminals continue being criminals committing more crimes because he thinks God isn't watching, despite what I think of it. Deus vult fiat justitia ruat cælum.

>>15485440

>"fruits of their labor"

Such as quickly siezeing this current board incarnation.

>>15485439

See above for current relevance.

Have you not seen the actual takeover started with Jim's ok?

>>15485376

they're entire economy is built on stolen American tech, who's the thief?

>>15485453

you can't dismiss everyone who makes a mistake or you'll have nothing left. This is more obvious than watching the left cancel themselves into obvlivion.

You'll never convince me this is an ok thing to do.

>>15485453

>>15485459

Please refer all 8kun admin/japanese conspiracy theories to /hivemind/

I hear they have all the good digs

second warning

>>15485439

>>15485479

I won't comment on the topic anymore

>>15485459

The mistake you're making is assuming that it is solitary and a mistake. Firstly it in itself is two actions, and I haven't mentioned the supporting facts because I assumed that investigators would dig into the links provided. FYI:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=829ZZFxvMUw

Don't get triggered, just the facts.

>>15485484

Warning of what?

>>15485519

Ok, I will not be a broken record.

BV, the baker is acting out. It can be fixed easily. imho no big deal

>>15485501

look faggot

my country's been getting robbed blind for 100 years and counting, I'm out of fucks to give. Japan fought on the right side in WWII so good on them. Then they robbed us blind.

If the US stole 2chan, which was built on the shoulders of American giants with the rest of Japan's tech, I don't care.

>>15485484

you dont have authority to give a warning, what are you going to do, annoy me?

>>15485537

What are they doing?

Care to elaborate?

The Question was Raised to the BO about Commas

Awaiting a Response

>>15485661

>What are they doing?

>Care to elaborate?

Adding unnecessary characters to the buns/dough (comma after every post link, colons after post links, extra spaces…)

Sloppy af and intentional

Probably trying to make a point, push an agenda

Might be moar saw an anon complain about inaccurate titles on links

>>15485718

Yeah idk what that's about, they also used "notable dig" as a description for a nom rather than my suggested title (MRNa in food)

Weren't they supposed to handoff?

>>15485733

>Weren't they supposed to handoff?

Thought so too, but they appear to want to run the bread all day

Does the BO see anything wrong with the Current Bakers Notes?

Thank you for your time and consideration into this Matter.

>>15485715

BV already addressed it

Hand off the bread if you don't know how to collate

The more I see this crew in action the more hope I have. Don't get too full of yourselves and remember - serve anons. You are the least and that's what gives you the credibility and the honor in all realms. BO has assembled a good crew.

>>15485755

Strange, Didn't see any glowies

You have the link to the Post?

>>15485770

>Strange, Didn't see any glowies

>You have the link to the Post?

Was a few breads back, don't think they used "glowies"

Shouldn't need to, if there is an error in the dough baker should be listening to even just anon pointing them out

>>15485764

looks like new admin is doing a good job

why dont you wait to see if baker does it again before crying wolf? could be an honest mistake.

>>15485796

>why dont you wait to see if baker does it again before crying wolf? could be an honest mistake.

Three breads of not listening is not an honest mistake

If BO or BV's want me to change anything

Glow and let me know

>>15485798

>>15485796

Attention to detail key. small changes cause big problems down the information conduit.

>>15485811

No Glow

No Worries

>>15485805

>Glow and let me know

Shouldn't be necessary

Bakers serve

Anons serve

If there is a mistake and it is pointed out, fix it

>>15485817

Good enough, I'm sure it will get sorted

If you feel a BV needs to use trip to point out an error in the dough it is your ego that is the problem

Bakers should listen to anons pointing out problems

You do glow tho

>>15485798

>>15485808

I see, wasnt watching.

>>15485805

you can control+f (you) from the bottom to check if anyone's talking to you. not admin.

I don't know about the comma thing, but the man's kept his mouth shut and done his job. If it interferes with whatever was explained to me earlier (about aggregators) I could see getting onto him, but if not… sure keep an eye on it, but damn: he's almost invisible and the buns are beautiful, imo. If I'm over my paygrade here, sorry. Just seemed worth sticking up for.

>>15485883

> aggregators)

Less about aggregators then archiving

>>15485883

Archiving, if broken because of it, is more critical

>>15485892

well that shit's above my paygrade right now.

you're saying adding a comma after the link before the headline fucks up the archives?

>>15485907

I'm not trying to start a fight. I don't know. I'm asking.

>>15485907

yes, adding a comma after the last post link on the line will screw up the aggregator bots

>>15485828

BV did great job. Gave baker every benefit of the doubt.

BV played the cards exactly correct.

BV are the hall monitors. Hall monitors take shit. Doesn't reduce the need for hall monitors.

>>15485952

acknowledged. Will work hard to make sure I don't do that.

Thank you for the info and your service.

Still, the last few bakes have been outstanding, imo.

>>15486011

Good bakers are coming back to QR. There will be bruised egos and misunderstandings but in the end we will win because God wins.

>>15486011

they look fine to me

although there is no white delimiter space even after BV edits as per >>15484193

not a big deal, everything running smoothly

Maybe anon spoke too soon?

>>15484020

Where'd globals go?

>>15486128

my bad

>>15486143

>>15486198 BO

>https://controlc.com/6f0cc6a0

this is the wrong dough.

1st under globals should be 19586

FYI

>>15486236

>https://controlc.com/6f0cc6a0

Was the open Ticket

The Baker has the Submitted Dough

https://controlc.com/c582bb5f

Relax

>>15486293

It's all good. Only noticed because I was going to clean up the commas for and offer to baker to use if he wishes.

Speaking of...

>>15486308 OB

Baker I removed all commas after last link and before headlines in all current notables. Not your boss. Just trying to help. Use if you would like.

https://controlc.com/index.php?act=submit

Dough Fixed

https://controlc.com/681e59c3

Current Bread Title also has glaring format issues…

>Q Research General #19587:Arizona hires Kek to review router logs

>"Dragon Energy Baker"

For the record

>>15485149

>>15485715

commas are for separating links

got a cap? saw a bread with commas after the links, that should be a space:

>>574943585 Notable description

>>15485718

>>15485136

>>15485241

>>15485325

>>15485376

>>15485429

>>15485459

Sounds serious. Think you guise better get off this platfrom *immediately* so you don't get in trouble. Won't tell anyone you were here.

>>15485745

been out, just back

u gotta be more specific, provide a CAP

>>15485753

>>15485764

>>15485764

yep, excellent comma use - kek

(bakers really asking BO about how to use commas? werd…)

>>15485798

if u want feedback, better provide details

i can't hangout out everywhere at once

>>15485805

same comment as above - what are they pissed about? you don't even provide a link or bread number

>>15485808

>Attention to detail key

absolutely correct, espec on notable bun formatting. generall not futzing around with dough, other bakers will call that out.

>>15485892

>archiving important

Yes.

>>15485907

plz just use std formatting, no commas at the end

>>15486036

>bakers coming back, will be misunderstandings

yep

kudos to BVs for sorting things out

they been around the block a few times

>>15486128

>globals gone

there's always something

bet they're not far off….

BTW, i will look at globals and recommend a consolidation

Have to look at where things go now that we are not using 3rd and 4th dough posts

that is new to me, this was not my decision, was here for a while (except for gerbil's doughs)

need to look at where to put those resources from those posts - restore to dough or put in a resource thread?

We will get all these questions answered and problems straightened out

It will take time

Very glad to have bakers back but yes, will be rocky as we work out the kinks

hang in there guise

TY BAKERS

>>15486354

Roger that.

">>574943585 Notable description"

>>15486321

Dough looks fine, ty.

Will look at Bread title and fix if needed.

OUT for now.

>>15486321

>>15486321

If you could keep your snarkyness down to this level for any significant length of time, I would have no issues with you at all. I might even stop calling you shortbus when we argue.

We are different people with different styles.

Just saying: I'm cool withthis doge

>>15486354

>Won't tell anyone you were here.

KEK

>>15486393

Fog of war is thicc, many impostas amogus

Barker likes to bark sometimes

Sorry for misunderstandings

o7

⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣠⣴⣶⣿⣿⣷⣶⣄⣀⣀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣰⣾⣿⣿⡿⢿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣷⣦⡀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢀⣾⣿⣿⡟⠁⣰⣿⣿⣿⡿⠿⠻⠿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣧⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣾⣿⣿⠏⠀⣴⣿⣿⣿⠉⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠈⢻⣿⣿⣇⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⢀⣠⣼⣿⣿⡏⠀⢠⣿⣿⣿⠇⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠈⣿⣿⣿⡀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⣰⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡇⠀⢸⣿⣿⣿⡀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣿⣿⣿⡇⠀⠀
⠀⠀⢰⣿⣿⡿⣿⣿⣿⡇⠀⠘⣿⣿⣿⣧⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢀⣸⣿⣿⣿⠁⠀⠀
⠀⠀⣿⣿⣿⠁⣿⣿⣿⡇⠀⠀⠻⣿⣿⣿⣷⣶⣶⣶⣶⣶⣿⣿⣿⣿⠃⠀⠀⠀
⠀⢰⣿⣿⡇⠀⣿⣿⣿⠀⠀⠀⠀⠈⠻⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠟⠁⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⢸⣿⣿⡇⠀⣿⣿⣿⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠉⠛⠛⠛⠉⢉⣿⣿⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⢸⣿⣿⣇⠀⣿⣿⣿⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢀⣤⣤⣤⡀⠀⠀⢸⣿⣿⣿⣷⣦⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⢻⣿⣿⣶⣿⣿⣿⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠈⠻⣿⣿⣿⣦⡀⠀⠉⠉⠻⣿⣿⡇⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠛⠿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣷⣤⡀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠈⠹⣿⣿⣇⣀⠀⣠⣾⣿⣿⡇⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠹⣿⣿⣿⣿⣦⣤⣤⣤⣤⣾⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡟⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠉⠻⢿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠿⠋⠉⠛⠋⠉⠉⠁⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠈⠉⠉⠉⠁

>>15486011

>Thank you for the info and your service.

I didnt respond to this since I think you thought I was BO. But if not, thanks! keep up the good work.

>>15487853

figured you might have been bv. regardless, you're here for a reason.

>>15488125

Gonna need updating but good

>>15488631

he's probably OSS but then again, I'm OSS

actually this whole thread is just me

>>15488665

I can determine whether you're a DOAR fag or not

It's very simple, can be discovered with one question:

Do you feel embarrassed right now?

>>15488687

everyone is a DOARfag, lighten up

>>15488631

Why would you be arguing with a baker?

Wait,

Nevermind.

https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0367027/

>>15488713

It washis bun