/qresearch/ - Q Research

>>10030001

>Stay strong, anon

Thanks

Divine Intervention (srs)

I posted on here a while ago about it.

Some "thing" rag-dolled me like a little boy and shoved me into my bed so hard I couldn't breath from the force placed on my ribs. I was being pushed so hard I could feel the floor on a King-Sized bed on a frame. I was at the bottom of a dog-pile once in high school, where about every player on the filed was on top of me, That didn't even compare to the force. I was shocked my bones stayed in tact.

I don't know what it was that did that to me, but after I ran out of the room screaming, I calmed down and had absolutely no desire to use again. Completely gone like I never tried a drug in my life.

Now I'm trying to figure out what tf IT wants from me. I know it wants my head back to good-working condition. I used to be a fart smeller back in the day!

>>10030013

Between Hanx and getting socked in the face by Oprah in front of a meat clock, there's plenty of reason to suspect Tom Hanks.

Why is Trump wearing a mask? Does he think that he is Bane? Why is he going along with the Deep State's scamdemic narrative?

>>10030013

Actually, I have 30 years expereince in the legal profession and I know what evidence is and isnt. I've seen no good evidence that Hanks has committed child abuse crimes, nor any evidence that he has been charged with such crimes. Maybe you should get a job abd get in touch with reality. Internet posts in general arent evidence, unless they are admissions by the party charged, and corroboration of other evidence. This stuff is way over your head. Get a job.

>>10030018

I said there is no EVIDENCE.

>>10030024

Social media posts is EVIDENCE idiot.

It may not be "proof" but it's evidence.

You have no clue what "evidence" even means.

Your stupid posts are "evidence" that you're a shill, but not 100% proof. Just 99% proof.

>>10030021

Once you focus on the fact that he wore a mask publicly so much, how can anyone now go back and say he is ignorant for not wearing a mask?

#

>>10030005

that certainly explains the lack of images this bread.

>>10030021

Imagine the thoughts of the flag burning, America hating, Dems hearing that wearing them is "patriotic."

>>10029982

Her initials are SRA

That is very very suspicious

Satanic Ritual Abuse is a real thing, and she seems to be making light of it.

It is very rare for people to use 3 names like that which makes it even more improbable and suspicious.

Lay charges in a court of law.

Until that happens, I don't believe any of the accusations.

Think of how Russia helped the USA find Chinese plans to infiltrate military weapons in US ports, by leaking that it had developed its own ballistic missiles hidden in containers, and a submarine doomsday weapon.

The result was that Russia hating DOD people went hunting and found Chinese containers in US ports containing ballistic missiles, and a hidden submarine port in the northern Bahamas with a sub carrying nuclear torpedoes aimed at a nuclear plant on Florida';s east coast not far from Palm Beach.

IKt is a Counter Intel technique to put suspicion on yourself, so that people investigate and find the actual criminals perpetrating the crimes.

>>10030024

Maybe not of any crimes, but the fucker's clearly a creep. And after the Hanx posts, I wouldn't be surprised by any direct evidence of crimes. It's enough to know for now that he's bad news.

Tom Hanks ranking in Hollywood, in addition to all the creepy things he has said and done, paint a picture of a minor attracted person. Toddlers and Tiarias itself was enough. His apologist posting here is the same dirtbag that is on the board all the time, attempting to 'debunk' everything. Probably a real piece of filth whose name we would recognize.

>>10030026

What habbens if I filter myself?

>>10030043

You switch timelines.

fill

>>10030026

nyuk

>>10030047

kewl~

>>10030024

You're trying to rationalize with anons. Usually a bad idea. A lawfag knows "no evidence" intuitively means there's no direct or substantive, corroborated, or supported evidence. Anons will misinterpret this and assume that a picture of a red shoe on social media means something deeper. It must be "evidence". Something deeper is going on with this "evidence". There's "evidence" that the NJ judge killer was a patsy or setup or whatever, because "Epstein/Maxwell".

Q, sorry but you did this too. You thought a tweet by Brennan was "evidence" of an assassination order. I mean, maybe if there was something else that proved the coded tweet was… evidence. But really? It's a bold claim to insinuate that a tweet was a coded assassination order. Needs "evidence".

Word of the day for anons, it seems.

Evidence

>>10030043

I've done it

You can't post anymore if I recall

>>10030043

You disappear - poof!!

>>10030057

Feeeel

>>10030041

I just want to know how he ended up getting punched by Oprah under a meat clock.

>>10030055

yuuh huuh i canz too.

maybe,

let's see if this posts. I am filtered by (me)

>>10030062

Images are FUBAR at the moment I see

>>10030065

>let's see if this posts. I am filtered by (me)

>>10030065

Which (me)?

>>10030068

Fuck me, Someone take that out?

>>10030036

She said that her parents named her that knowing the meaning of her initials (SRA - Satanic Ritual Abuse) because she claims her family were Satanists who trafficked her to people, including famous people like Tom Hanks.

What's more suspicious is that she was replying to Tom Hanks tweets as though nothing had happened. Like when do you stop being angry at your rapist and just start posting quizzical emojis at him. What a larp she is. Meanwhile real victims are out there and silence by people like Sarah. She is not only a larp lying in wait to make anons look bad, but she probably rats out real whisteblowers who might contact her with information they have about Hanks and others. So she's probably a honey pot as well as a larp.

>>10030070

Where am I?

>>10030043

No anon who has done it before has been able to relay a message back to say what happens.

benis