[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ r8k / ck / wooo / fit / random / biz / cow / eots / fiobr / gigacube / lathe / lumidor / nand ]

/qnotables25/ - ===Q Notables 2025===

Anon Curated Notables 2025 Edition

Name
Email
Subject
REC
STOP
Comment *
File
Password (Randomized for file and post deletion; you may also set your own.)
Archive
* = required field[▶Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.
Embed
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Options

Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webp,webm, mp4, mov, pdf
Max filesize is16 MB.
Max image dimensions are15000 x15000.
You may upload5 per post.


| QNotables | QNotables 2025 | QNotables 2023 | QNotables 2022 | QNotables 2021 | QNotables 2020 | QNotables 2019 | QNotables 2018 | CBTS-Archive |

File: 4870557c1818a7f⋯.png (214.03 KB,1200x600,2:1,Clipboard.png)

80e470 No.50955 [Last 50 Posts]

/qresearch/ Australia

Re-Posts of notables

____________________________
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109224

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23252468 (290934ZJUN25) Notable: Talisman Sabre Tweets: - We have reached the end of the Australian component of EXTS25 as activities now move to Papua New Guinea. This is the first time that a component of Exercise Talisman Sabre has been hosted outside of Australia and will conclude with a closing ceremony on 4 August. We thank all those who have participated to date and supported Talisman Sabre 25 and we look forward to seeing you all at Talisman Sabre 27. #ts25 #talismansabre #talismansabre25 #YourADF #StrongerTogether

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Talisman Sabre 2025 is coming from 13 July - 04 August 2025

Asia Pacific Defence Reporter - 23/04/2025

Australia will host the largest ever Exercise Talisman Sabre from 13 July to 4 August 2025 with over 30,000 military personnel from 19 nations set to participate in activities across Australia, and for the first time, in Papua New Guinea. Now in its 11th iteration, Talisman Sabre is the largest bilateral combined training activity between the Australian Defence Force and the United States military, reflecting the closeness of our Alliance.

Participating partner nations in Talisman Sabre 2025 also include Canada, Fiji, France, Germany, India, Indonesia, Japan, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Papua New Guinea, the Philippines, the Republic of Korea, Singapore, Thailand, Tonga, and the United Kingdom. Brunei, Malaysia and Vietnam will also attend as observers.

Talisman Sabre 2025 will focus on multi-domain warfighting. Key activities will include amphibious and airborne lodgements, firepower demonstrations, and combat across land, air, sea, space and cyber domains. The logistics for preparing, staging, integrating and moving forces to and around Australia are the most complex ever undertaken for a Talisman Sabre. The activities are scheduled to take place right across the nation, including Queensland, Western Australia, the Northern Territory, New South Wales and on Christmas Island.

For the first time ever, Papua New Guinea will also host an activity, highlighting the growing capabilities and interoperability with Pacific partners as Papua New Guinea marks its 50th Anniversary of Independence.

Chief of Joint Operations, Vice Admiral Justin Jones, said: “Talisman Sabre demonstrates our enduring Alliance with the United States, through deepening cooperation in training and force integration. It is a key opportunity to work with our partners from across the region and around the globe, demonstrating our combined capability to achieve large-scale operational outcomes together. As well as welcoming the largest ever contingent of partner nations, Australia is also excited to be holding part of this year’s exercise in Papua New Guinea. This is an important demonstration of the deepening integration between Australia and Papua New Guinea’s Defence Forces.”

Talisman Sabre Exercise Director, Brigadier Damian Hill, said: “This year’s exercise will demonstrate our ability to receive large volumes of personnel and equipment into Australia from across the Indo-Pacific, to stage, integrate and move them forward into the large exercise area. Considerable planning has gone into a safe and productive exercise for all participants. Talisman Sabre 2025 will be held across a range of Defence and non-Defence training areas throughout northern Australia. I thank the traditional owners, landowners, state authorities, and key community stakeholders who have helped us develop a safe and productive exercise for all participating nations.”

https://asiapacificdefencereporter.com/australia-hosting-exercise-talisman-sabre/

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DBVBgSPCLPc

https://www.defence.gov.au/defence-activities/exercises/talisman-sabre

https://qresear.ch/?q=Talisman+Sabre

>Talisman Sabre

MAGIC SWORD

https://qalerts.pub/?q=Operation+Specialists

https://qalerts.pub/?q=magic

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109225

File: 7103917d58b28e0⋯.jpg (122.34 KB,852x226,426:113,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23252471 (290942ZJUN25) Notable: Q Post #2064 - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G02wKufX3nw - Played by 'Operation Specialists' [pre-event] last night. Q - https://qanon.pub/#2064

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109224

Q Post #2064

Sep 2 2018 15:18:24 (EST)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G02wKufX3nw

Played by 'Operation Specialists' [pre-event] last night.

Q

https://qanon.pub/#2064

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109226

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23252473 (290944ZJUN25) Notable: Video: Magic Sword - In The Face Of Evil - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G02wKufX3nw - Jan 8, 2015

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109224

>>109225

Magic Sword - In The Face Of Evil

Magic Sword

Jan 8, 2015

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G02wKufX3nw

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109227

File: 9699e658fe4fa29⋯.jpg (406.7 KB,852x873,284:291,Clipboard.jpg)

File: cc46d4f02df48d7⋯.jpg (103.41 KB,1050x550,21:11,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23252476 (290950ZJUN25) Notable: Q Post #2065 - >why did I get extreme goosebumps while listening to this?? - https://qanon.pub/#2065

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109224

>>109225

>>109226

Q Post #2065

Sep 2 2018 15:24:57 (EST)

>why did I get extreme goosebumps while listening to this??

https://qanon.pub/#2065

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109228

File: cf1d69e6a12d1e9⋯.jpg (256.27 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 120301e7da599fe⋯.jpg (77.74 KB,1280x720,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23252491 (291001ZJUN25) Notable: Video: Wissam Haddad escalates violent rhetoric on eve of hate speech verdict – Jewish leaders are bracing for a Federal Court decision on whether Sydney cleric Wissam Haddad breached section 18C of the Racial Discrimination Act. Haddad, long accused of promoting extremist views, described Jews as “vile” and “treacherous” in sermons at his Bankstown centre and has since escalated his rhetoric online, invoking swords against Jews and Christians. The case, brought by the Executive Council of Australian Jewry, seeks injunctions to stop future vilification. It comes as NSW crossbenchers move to repeal hate speech laws linked to the discredited Dural caravan plot.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>73626 (pb)

Wissam Haddad escalates violent rhetoric on eve of hate speech verdict

STEPHEN RICE - 29 June 2025

1/2

Jewish community leaders are waiting nervously to find out whether hate preacher Wissam Haddad will be allowed to continue his anti-Semitic attacks, with the Federal Court to deliver a landmark ruling in the vilification case against the radical cleric amid moves by NSW crossbenchers to repeal new hate speech and protest laws.

On Tuesday, judge Angus Stewart will hand down his verdict on whether Mr ­Haddad breached section 18C of the Racial Discrimination Act in sermons asserting that Jews were “vile” and “treacherous” people.

Mr Haddad or speakers at his Bankstown-based Al Madina Dawah Centre in southwest Sydney have called Jewish people “descendants of pigs and monkeys”, recited parables about their killing, and said people should “spit” on Israel so its citizens “would drown”.

In his defence to the claim brought by the Executive Council of Australian Jewry, Mr Haddad has claimed he was referring to or reciting Islamic scripture in sermons he made in the wake of the October 7, 2023, Hamas terrorist attacks.

Mr Haddad has escalated his violent rhetoric as the decision approaches, invoking the Koran in a sermon posted to social media about swords being raised against “Ahl al-Kitab” (the People of the Book, primarily Jews and Christians) “until they pay the Jizya” (a tax paid by non-Muslims living under Islamic rule in return for protection).

“As for the words of the messenger … when he said ‘I was sent with the sword’, it means that Allah sent him as a caller to ­Tawhid (the oneness and uniqueness of Allah) with a sword, after inviting the people to be a witness to Allah with evidence that whoever does not respond to the invitation of this Tawhid, through the Koran and its evidences is therefore called to Islam with the sword”, Mr Haddad said.

The post suggests he is deliberately using the violent imagery as a provocation.

“We are on the topic of swords, and the topic angers the Kuffar (disbelievers) … and in fact, angering them is a type of Ibadah (worship; acts done to seek the pleasure of Allah)”, Mr Haddad says in the video.

An earlier video featuring ­images of an Arabic sword, in which Mr Haddad warned that “we are not going to come unarmed”, was condemned by Jewish community members as an incitement to young radicals to commit violence.

In an early hearing, Justice Stewart said “upon quick reading” the case against Mr Haddad was “damning”, and pushed back on an argument that certain sermons were protected by section 18D of the ­Racial Discrimination Act that provides exemptions for public interest rhetoric, given it runs counter to his own judgment in the successful case of Greens deputy leader Mehreen Faruqi against One Nation’s leader, Pauline Hanson.

If Justice Stewart decides in favour of Mr Haddad, many in the Jewish community fear the case could unleash a storm of anti-­Semitic rhetoric from radical clerics, at a moment when hate speech laws are being attacked in the NSW parliament as the product of a “fake” terror plot.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109229

File: 057b62dda39a16b⋯.jpg (113.71 KB,1280x720,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: ceba7465e1fb31b⋯.jpg (203.04 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23256427 (300856ZJUN25) Notable: Beijing’s argument against increasing defence spending and China threat – China’s ambassador to Australia, Xiao Qian, has urged Anthony Albanese not to raise military spending, warning it would burden the economy and undermine growth, while dismissing fears over Beijing’s military build-up. His intervention comes as Penny Wong heads to Washington for Quad talks and Albanese prepares for a visit to Beijing. Defence Minister Richard Marles has warned of China’s aggressive actions, while US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth said Beijing is preparing for war. Canberra maintains defence and social spending are not mutually exclusive, though critics argue strategic priorities remain underfunded.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>73555 (pb)

>>73560 (pb)

>>73421 (pb)

Beijing’s argument against increasing defence spending and China threat

GEOFF CHAMBERS and NOAH YIM - 30 June 2025

1/2

Xi Jinping’s top diplomat in Australia has warned Anthony Albanese that increasing military spending will impose a “heavy fiscal burden” on his budget and undermine economic development, in an attack on ­Donald Trump’s push for Canberra to ramp up defence spending and help counter Chinese aggression.

Ahead of the Prime Minister’s expected visit to Beijing next month and Penny Wong travelling to Washington this week for a Quad foreign ministers meeting, Chinese ambassador to Australia Xiao Qian rejected domestic fears about China’s massive armed ­forces build-up and threat to ­regional security.

Writing in The Australian, Mr Xiao claimed China and Australia were “friends, not foes”, Beijing’s military build-up was “normal” and “just 1.5 per cent of GDP” was being spent on the People’s Liberation Army.

As Mr Albanese pledges to fund necessary ADF capabilities presented to him but resists US calls to increase defence spending to 3.5 per cent of GDP, Mr Xiao urged against lifting military expenditure on the grounds of economic peril. “Dramatically increasing military spending ­places a heavy fiscal burden on the countries involved, undermining their efforts to boost economies and improve livelihoods, and further straining a global economy already struggling with weak ­recovery,” he wrote.

“Some countries are ailing yet demand their ‘allies and partners’ foot the bill for medicine, which seems to be an almost laughable notion. Whether to spend on arms purchases, handouts to the ‘hegemon’, or pooling funds for its sake, or to heed their own people’s calls for economic development, is now a difficult choice for these ‘allies and partners’.”

Mr Xiao’s intervention weeks before Mr Albanese meets with the Chinese President is a dramatic escalation in Beijing’s efforts to fight back against US officials calling on allies including Australia to spend more on defence.

The ambassador’s claims that Australia must choose between defence spending and social services comes just days after Spain’s Prime Minister, Pedro Sanchez, stared down tariff threats from Mr Trump. The Spanish leader said last week he would not sign up to NATO’s 5 per cent defence spending pledge to protect his country’s “welfare state”.

Speaking at the Shangri-La Dialogue in Singapore this month, Defence Minister Richard Marles warned that China was engaged in the largest military build-up since World War II without providing “any strategic reassurance”.

There have been multiple incidents where Australian Defence Force personnel have been put in danger by the PLA, which recently dispatched a spy ship to southern Australia and authorised Chinese warships to circumnavigate the country and conduct live fire exercises in the Tasman Sea ahead of the May 3 election.

In addition to cyber warfare and espionage operations targeting Australia, Chinese naval vessels and aircraft have targeted Australian navy and air force personnel conducting joint exercises with the US and regional allies.

Amid a 30-day Pentagon review into the AUKUS nuclear submarine agreement and pressure from the White House for the Albanese government to lift military spending, US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth told the Shangri-La Dialogue that China was preparing for war.

Mr Hegseth said it was clear Beijing, which has made huge ­investments in nuclear weapons, hypersonics and amphibious ­assault capabilities, was preparing to ­“potentially use military force to alter the balance of power in the Indo-Pacific” and that Mr Xi could order an invasion of Taiwan by 2027.

Without naming the US, Mr Xiao accused some countries of hyping up the “so-called ‘China threat” narrative” at the Shangri-La Dialogue, G7 and NATO ­summits, while “inciting” Australia to follow their lead on defence spending.

“By playing up international and regional tensions and slandering China’s normal military build-up, these countries are merely seeking nothing but excuses to drastically grow their military spending, even arbitrarily reaching beyond its geographical scope and mandate,” he wrote.

“Behind the so-called ‘China threat’ lies certain countries’ desire to maintain their hegemony. They are trapped in their own inertia, fear fair competition, and even cannot tolerate other countries from making progress.

“To this end, they seek to stifle the development and advancement of countries like China, so that they can continue plundering the world through hegemony while funnelling benefits to their backers.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109230

File: 889ad717f0a30e5⋯.jpg (177.02 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 1a3290be9c990ca⋯.jpg (187.29 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23256450 (300908ZJUN25) Notable: OPINION: Don’t fall for NATO’s hyped-up rhetoric on defence spending“Recently, some countries hyped up the so-called China threat narrative on occasions such as the Shangri-La Dialogue, G7 summit and NATO summit, proclaiming to significantly increase defence expenditures, and even incited Australia to follow suit. Such rhetoric and actions are steeped in Cold War mentality, blatantly creating division, fuelling a global arms race as well as threatening world peace and stability, which warrants our high vigilance. China and Australia are friends, not foes. This should never have been in question. China has been always developing bilateral friendship and co-operation with the utmost sincerity and patience, and we hope Australia will work with us in the same direction.” – Xiao Qian, China’s ambassador to Australia – The Australian

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109229

OPINION: Don’t fall for NATO’s hyped-up rhetoric on defence spending

XIAO QIAN - 30 June 2025

1/2

Recently, some countries hyped up the so-called China threat narrative on occasions such as the Shangri-La Dialogue, G7 summit and NATO summit, proclaiming to significantly increase defence expenditures, and even incited Australia to follow suit.

Such rhetoric and actions are steeped in Cold War mentality, blatantly creating division, fuelling a global arms race as well as threatening world peace and stability, which warrants our high vigilance.

By playing up international and regional tensions and slandering China’s normal military build-up, these countries are merely seeking nothing but excuses to drastically grow their military spending, even arbitrarily reaching beyond its geographical scope and mandate.

NATO countries already account for 55 per cent of the world’s total military spending in 2024.

Yet they are still required to raise defence investment to 5 per cent of GDP to build a “more lethal NATO”.

Behind the so-called China threat lies certain countries’ desire to maintain their hegemony. They are trapped in their own inertia, fear fair competition and even cannot tolerate other countries from making progress.

To this end, they seek to stifle the development and advancement of countries such as China, so they can continue plundering the world through hegemony while funnelling benefits to their backers. This runs counter to fairness, justice and the prevailing trend of global development.

Healthy competition is the only path towards world progress and civilisation advancement, a consensus long held by the international community.

Dramatically increasing military spending places a heavy fiscal burden on the countries involved, undermining their efforts to boost economies and improve livelihoods, and further straining a global economy already struggling with weak recovery. Some countries are ailing yet demand their allies and partners foot the bill for medicine, which seems to be an almost laughable notion.

Whether to spend on arms purchases, handouts to the hegemon, or pooling funds for its sake, or to heed their own people’s calls for economic development, is now a difficult choice for these allies and partners.

To be frank, this is not the first time China has been labelled and targeted. In recent years a handful of countries have rallied so-called allies and partners to repeatedly smear China, peddling narratives such as the “China collapse”, “China threat” and even “Peak China”, while imposing economic suppression and technological blockades. Yet the only tangible outcome of their painstaking efforts to undermine international rules and order has been global economic stagnation, slower technological innovation and heightened regional instability.

Facing these smears and containment, China’s economy has demonstrated remarkable resilience and the living standards of the Chinese people have continued to rise. China has always been a steadfast supporter, defender and promoter of world peace. More than 600 years ago, Zheng He’s seven voyages to the Western Seas carried only silk, porcelain, trade and friendship.

Shortly after the founding of the People’s Republic of China, it put forward the Five Principles of Peaceful Coexistence.

Across the past 70-plus years, China has never initiated a war or occupied an inch of a foreign land. It is the only country that has incorporated peaceful development in its constitution and the only country among the nuclear-weapon states to pledge no first use of nuclear weapons.

China unwaveringly adheres to a defensive national defence policy, with military spending accounting for just 1.5 per cent of its GDP. It is far below the global average and paling in comparison to certain hegemons or their allies and partners.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109231

File: 0fae8a92582a2af⋯.jpg (180.59 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 35093756c479823⋯.jpg (158.78 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23256464 (300915ZJUN25) Notable: Anthony Albanese riled by questions on China envoy’s op-ed – Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said his government would commit whatever funding was necessary for defence after China’s ambassador to Australia, Xiao Qian, urged restraint in an op-ed arguing the “China threat” narrative was fuelling an arms race. Albanese rejected suggestions he was aligning with Beijing, telling reporters: “The Chinese ambassador speaks for China … my job is to speak for Australia.” The dispute comes amid US pressure for Canberra to lift defence spending to 3.5 per cent of GDP and rising concerns over China’s rapid nuclear and conventional military expansion.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109229

>>109230

Anthony Albanese riled by questions on China envoy’s op-ed

JOSEPH OLBRYCHT-PALMER - 30 June 2025

1/2

Anthony Albanese says his government will pump as much cash as is needed into Australia’s defence after China’s ambassador wrote an op-ed urging Canberra to restrain from spending more.

In his piece published on Monday, Xiao Qian said China and Australia were “not foes” despite being embroiled in a regional rivalry and Beijing rapidly building up conventional and nuclear military capabilities.

It came as the Prime Minister faces domestic and international calls to boost the defence budget, with the US warning of a potentially “imminent” threat from China in the Indo Pacific.

But Mr Albanese has resisted, making Australia an outlier in the West – a position highlighted by NATO’s decision last week to dramatically hike military spending to 5 per cent of GDP.

Fronting media on Monday, Mr Albanese did not align with Xi Jinping’s envoy either.

“The Chinese ambassador speaks for China,” Mr Albanese told reporters.

“My job is to speak for Australia.

“And it’s in Australia’s national interest for us to invest in our capability and to invest in our relationships, and we’re doing just that.”

Asked by a reporter for The Australian if Mr Xiao’s comments constituted “meddling”, a visibly riled Mr Albanese said: “I don’t know, your newspaper published the op-ed.”

He added that people were free to “make comments”.

“That’s up to them,” Mr Albanese said.

“What my job is to do is speak for Australia, and that’s what I do.”

‘Not foes’

Mr Albanese and his senior minister have stuck firm to deciding what capability Australia needs and then funding it, rather than committing to a set percentage of GDP like most other countries and some previous Australian governments.

Mr Xiao used his op-ed in The Australian to urge Canberra to stay the course and continue resisting spending more on defence.

“Recently, some countries hyped up the so-called China threat narrative on occasions such as the Shangri-La Dialogue, G7 summit and NATO summit, proclaiming to significantly increase defence expenditures, and even incited Australia to follow suit,” he wrote.

“Such rhetoric and actions are steeped in Cold War mentality, blatantly creating division, fuelling a global arms race as well as threatening world peace and stability, which warrants our high vigilance.

“By playing up international and regional tensions and slandering China’s normal military build-up, these countries are merely seeking nothing but excuses to drastically grow their military spending, even arbitrarily reaching beyond its geographical scope and mandate.”

He accused “certain countries” of trying to contain China because they “fear fair competition” and “cannot tolerate other countries from making progress”.

Mr Xiao’s piece came as Foreign Minister Penny Wong heads to Washington for a second meeting with her Quad counterparts within six months.

The Quad, made up of Australia, India, Japan and the US, is a partnership broadly seen as a check on China’s economic and military might.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109232

File: 6ddd7743478cb69⋯.jpg (261.75 KB,1930x1086,965:543,Clipboard.jpg)

File: f27c6589424bd0d⋯.jpg (223.17 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23256474 (300923ZJUN25) Notable: COMMENTARY: It’s time to get real about our China problem, PM“Labor’s obfuscation on China and its refusal to publicly accept the need for a serious boost to defence spending are not helping Albanese secure an all-important first meeting with Donald Trump. Instead of seeing Albanese cement ties with Australia’s closest ally, Australians will watch him cosying up to Xi Jinping and sidestepping more questions on the Chinese threat. It’s time for the Prime Minister to talk clearly about the security threats the nation faces and have an honest conversation with the public about what this means for the defence budget.” – Ben Packham – The Australian

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>73634 (pb)

>>109229

>>109230

COMMENTARY: It’s time to get real about our China problem, PM

BEN PACKHAM - 30 June 2025

When will Anthony Albanese be upfront with the Australian people on the security threat posed by China?

He was happy to dog whistle about Donald Trump for votes in the election campaign but refuses to speak clearly about Beijing’s strategic intentions and what they mean for Australia.

The last time the government made a serious case about the China threat was at the 2023 ALP national conference, when Defence Industry Minister Pat Conroy spoke starkly about Beijing’s massive military build-up to smash criticism of AUKUS by the party’s hard left.

Two years later, that speech has curiously disappeared from the internet and the government is once again pretending there’s nothing to see here.

Albanese passed up another opportunity on Monday morning to be real with the Australian people on China in the wake of an opinion piece published in this newspaper by Beijing’s top diplomat in Canberra lecturing the government on defence spending.

Ambassador Xiao Qian, whose country is turning out submarines, warships and missiles at a frightening rate, had the gall to warn Australia that lifting defence spending to the 5 per cent agreed by NATO countries would cause tensions internationally and undermine living standards at home.

If anything, this should focus the government’s mind more clearly on the urgent need to rethink its defence budget. But the Prime Minister was having none of it.

Journalist: “We’ve seen the Chinese ambassador to Australia make comments about defence spending … this morning. What can you tell the Australian people about the military threat posed by China, and do you remain concerned about the military build-up that China is undertaking?”

Prime Minister: “The Chinese ambassador speaks for China. My job is to speak for Australia, and it’s in Australia’s national interest for us to invest in our capability and to invest in our relationships, and we’re doing just that.”

It’s no wonder the US is having second thoughts about handing over three of its Virginia-class submarines to Australia, as evidenced by its snap 30-day review of the AUKUS pact.

As the man behind the review, Elbridge Colby, warned last year: “It would be crazy for the United States to give away its single most important asset for a conflict with China over Taiwan.”

In the absence of any signal to the contrary, the US has every right to feel concerned that those submarines, if given to Australia, will sit on the sidelines in any war with China.

Labor’s obfuscation on China and its refusal to publicly accept the need for a serious boost to defence spending are not helping Albanese secure an all-important first meeting with Donald Trump.

There is no sign the government is preparing to shift its position on either issue, which will make for an uncomfortable audience with the US President if and when the Prime Minister makes it to the White House.

Penny Wong will no doubt do her diplomatic best to reassure the US that Australia remains a rock-solid ally when she meets her American counterpart, Marco Rubio, in Washington DC this week.

The problem is, she is the author of the government’s cautious language on China and an opponent of much of the Trump administration’s foreign policy agenda.

Expect more ambiguity from the government in coming weeks when Albanese travels to Beijing.

As revealed by The Australian, the Prime Minister is unlikely to get a meeting with Trump before the visit, around the middle of July.

Instead of seeing Albanese cement ties with Australia’s closest ally, Australians will watch him cosying up to Xi Jinping and sidestepping more questions on the Chinese threat.

It’s time for the Prime Minister to talk clearly about the security threats the nation faces and have an honest conversation with the public about what this means for the defence budget.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/commentary/its-time-to-get-real-about-our-china-problem-pm/news-story/dd609d97930d6d673c6abb2068bb70a6

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109233

File: 9b30fd67d010962⋯.jpg (192.91 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: f30e7565353f0fc⋯.jpg (298.91 KB,2047x1152,2047:1152,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23256499 (300958ZJUN25) Notable: Kevin Rudd says US, Donald Trump have chance to build stable Middle East – Australia’s ambassador to the US, Kevin Rudd, praised Donald Trump’s intervention in the Israel-Iran conflict, giving him “full marks” for brokering a ceasefire and suggesting it could open a path to a two-state solution for Palestine. Speaking at the Aspen Ideals Festival, Rudd said degrading Iran’s nuclear program met Israeli security interests and created “an opportunity to secure the future” if Netanyahu could be persuaded. He added Trump’s pressure on NATO allies had succeeded, while cautioning China remained focused on Taiwan and prepared to use force if necessary.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>73662 (pb)

>>>/qresearch/23218742 (pb)

Kevin Rudd says US, Donald Trump have chance to build stable Middle East

JOE KELLY - 30 June 2025

1/2

Kevin Rudd has given Donald Trump “full marks” on his intervention in the Israel-Iran conflict, while voicing hopes that the US President might now persuade Benjamin Netanyahu to accept a two-state solution with Palestine.

Australia’s ambassador to the US also said the recent decision of NATO members to lift defence spending was the result of a “cocktail of factors” – including the threat to Europe posed by Russia and Mr Trump’s ongoing insistence that America’s partners contribute more to their own security.

“To give President Trump his dues, he has always said that he does not accept that proposition that any US allies should be freeloading on the United States,” Dr Rudd said.

Pressed on the 30-day Pentagon review on the future of the AUKUS agreement, Dr Rudd said the Australian government was “completely relaxed about that … because it is what administration do when they are newly elected for programs which they have inherited from previous administrations”.

He also suggested there was a chance for Mr Trump to reach a grand bargain with Chinese leader Xi Jinping across a range of areas, including trade, investment, technology restrictions, national security issues – including cyber and space – as well as narcotics and fentanyl.

Asked whether Mr Trump deserved the Noble peace prize for his Middle East diplomacy, Dr Rudd did not rule out the possibility. He responded by saying that – given his own past experience as a junior diplomat in Scandinavia – he was aware that “the Nobel committee in Oslo … fiercely guards its independence”.

“But in being fiercely independent and having, through their own country, been party to the Oslo process ... which for the first time brought Palestinians and Israelis around the table way back when – 20 years ago – I’m sure our Norwegian friends will be very mindful of a real outcome,” he said.

Dr Rudd made sure to qualify his remarks at the Aspen Ideals Festival in Colorado, saying that he was a “China guy” by background and that the Middle East was “not my patch”. He said his remarks on the Middle East were those a “rank amateur” and did not represent “the official views of the Australian government”.

Speaking in conversation with Politico’s Jonathan Martin, Dr Rudd said that “we all want the ceasefire to hold. And, frankly, full marks to the President for having the chutzpah to put it on the line.”

He said Mr Trump was able to achieve a “ceasefire between the two most unlikely states to agree to a ceasefire”.

Dr Rudd said Mr Trump had finally brought the “Iranians to the negotiating table in terms of accepting a set of arrangements with the US and the rest of the international community on what is left ... of the Iranian nuclear weapons program”.

He was also optimistic about the outlook for Gaza and the West Bank, saying that Mr Trump’s actions would help “move the debate and the dial in the direction of a sustainable two-state solution”.

In addition, the fact that the Iranian nuclear program had now been degraded met a core Israeli national security interest. Dr Rudd said this would “therefore hopefully provide an opening for the United States and the rest of the international community to cause Israel to conclude that a two-state outcome is the best for Israel, best for the Palestinian people, best for the US, best for US allies, including my own country, and best for the rest of the world because there does need to be a Palestinian homeland”.

“If President Trump can push in this direction to get the Israeli government, notwithstanding Bibi Netanyahu’s reservations, across that line and, assuming there is a reform program within the Palestinian Authority, which has been notoriously badly administered, then I think there is an opportunity to secure the future,” he said.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109234

File: 6cc2dbdc7da80e9⋯.jpg (158.77 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 8117601c9709470⋯.jpg (238.32 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 295187ab1bb8adc⋯.jpg (261.31 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23256501 (301000ZJUN25) Notable: Penny Wong to meet Quad counterparts in Washington – Foreign Minister Penny Wong will meet her Quad counterparts in Washington this week, calling the talks vital to confronting Indo-Pacific challenges. “This will be the second Quad Foreign Ministers’ Meeting within six months, reflecting the importance of our partnership,” she said, stressing the US is Australia’s “closest ally and principal strategic partner.” The summit comes amid tariffs on Australian exports, a Pentagon review of AUKUS, and US pressure to lift defence spending to 3.5 per cent of GDP. US officials have warned of an “imminent” threat from China, including possible action against Taiwan by 2027.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109229

Penny Wong to meet Quad counterparts in Washington

JOSEPH OLBRYCHT-PALMER - 30 June 2025

Australia’s chief diplomat will meet her Quad counterparts in Washington this week as the Trump administration looks to ramp up pressure on China.

The Quad, made up of Australia, India, Japan and the US, is a partnership broadly seen as a check on China’s economic and military might.

Foreign Minister Penny Wong said the upcoming dialogue reflected the challenges facing the Indo Pacific.

“This will be the second Quad Foreign Ministers’ Meeting within six months, reflecting the importance of our partnership and the strategic circumstances confronting our region and the world,” she said in a statement.

“I look forward to engaging with my Quad counterparts as we strengthen cooperation to ensure a peaceful, stable and prosperous Indo-Pacific.”

Senator Wong also said she would “meet separately with each of my counterparts … to progress bilateral cooperation”.

The meeting comes as pressure mounts on the Albanese government to bolster Australia’s alliance with the US.

Nearly six months have passed since Donald Trump’s inauguration and Anthony Albanese is yet to secure an in-person meeting with the US President.

Australian producers have been slugged with tariffs on most exports to the US, including duties of up to 50 per cent on steel and aluminium, and doubts loom large about the Trump administration’s commitment to AUKUS after it launched a snap review of the defence pact.

The Albanese government has also refused to budge after Washington’s call to hike defence spending to 3.5 per cent of GDP amid alarm over China’s military build-up.

In her statement, Senator Wong stressed the US “is our closest ally and principal strategic partner”.

“Our alliance contributes to the peace, prosperity and stability of our countries and the region we share,” she said.

“We will continue to work together to further our important economic and security partnership and advance our mutual interests.”

Former US president Joe Biden was last year caught on a hot mic telling his fellow Quad leaders that China was “testing” them, giving a rare glimpse into the candid nature of talks between some of the region’s key players.

“We believe (Chinese President) Xi Jinping is looking to focus on domestic economic challenges and minimise the turbulence in China’s diplomatic relationships, and he’s also looking to buy himself some diplomatic space, in my view, to aggressively pursue China’s interest,” Mr Biden said.

“China continues to behave aggressively, testing us all across the region, and it’s true in the South China Sea, the East China Sea, South China, South Asia and the Taiwan Straits.

“It’s true across the scope of our relationship, including on economic and technology issues.”

Mr Biden’s bluntness was a stark contrast of how leaders of all Quad countries have tried to frame the strategic four-way dialogue, often deflecting suggestions that it exists to counter China.

The hawkish approach to Beijing has been adopted by the Trump administration, with US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth earlier this month warning of an “imminent” threat to the Indo Pacific.

Mr Hegseth said China could invade Taiwan as early as 2027.

Such a move would deal a major blow to global supply of semiconductors – crucial components in modern tech – and massively disrupt vital trade routes.

“Let me be clear, any attempt by Communist China to conquer Taiwan by force would result in devastating consequences for the Indo-Pacific and the world,” Mr Hegseth said.

“There’s no reason to sugarcoat it. The threat China poses is real and it could be imminent.

“We hope not but certainly could be.”

Meeting with Deputy Prime Minister Richard Marles on the sidelines of the conference, he directly asked Australia to boost the defence budget to 3.5 per cent of GDP.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/breaking-news/penny-wong-to-meet-quad-counterparts-in-washington/news-story/3a8d91e4f5d9181b953bcb3a3182f1db

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109235

File: 6ee8894656374dc⋯.jpg (3.06 MB,6048x4024,756:503,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23260756 (010932ZJUL25) Notable: Australia’s friends in Congress urge Albanese to prioritise Trump visit – Senior US lawmakers Republican Michael McCaul and Democrat Joe Courtney have called on Anthony Albanese to prioritise a White House meeting, stressing Donald Trump values personal diplomacy and that such a gesture would reinforce AUKUS. The pair, who co-chair the Friends of Australia Caucus, warned the pact could be tested by a Pentagon review and pressure for Australia to lift defence spending. McCaul said “the president is transactional,” suggesting Canberra commit a higher share of GDP to defence, while Courtney insisted spending levels remain Australia’s choice. Albanese is working towards a September visit after months of tariffs and alliance strain. (105 words)

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>73634 (pb)

>>73662 (pb)

>>>/qresearch/23234931 (pb)

Australia’s friends in Congress urge Albanese to prioritise Trump visit

Jessica Gardner - Jun 30, 2025

1/2

Washington | Two senior US lawmakers backing the AUKUS nuclear defence pact have issued a bipartisan plea for Prime Minister Anthony Albanese to prioritise a White House visit and forge the personal relationships needed to keep the agreement intact and ease broader strains on the alliance.

Republican Michael McCaul and Democrat Joe Courtney, in the US House of Representatives, said President Donald Trump valued one-on-one interactions, and his approach to diplomacy was heavily influenced by his past as a dealmaker.

“For [Albanese] to come to the White House would be a great gesture on the prime minister’s part, that I think would go over very well,” McCaul said in an interview. “That would be very sound advice for him to do that.”

The president’s tariff blitz challenged the friendship between the United States and Australia who, as a close ally and free trade agreement partner, had hoped for a carve-out. In June, military ties were shaken when it emerged that Elbridge Colby, the US defence under-secretary for policy, would review the AUKUS agreement. The review will weigh up whether Australia is spending enough on defence capabilities and the alliance poses any risk to American military efforts.

Colby has long held a view that the US should prioritise bolstering its own military power against the rising threat of Chinese aggression in the Pacific over the AUKUS alliance.

McCaul, a Texan who is worried about China, and Courtney, whose Connecticut district is home to shipyards, are leading the fight for AUKUS on Capitol Hill as co-chairs of the Friends of Australia Caucus. Last week, they wrote to Colby and Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth seeking assurances that shipbuilders would be able to ramp up their production in time to deliver submarines to Australia in 2032 without undermining the US Navy’s fleet.

With Trump’s focus on deals and personal relationships, Courtney said Albanese should argue that Australian companies are heavily investing in American shipyards – set to hit $US3 billion ($4.6 billion) – and that the government does not expect any special deal on the three, four or five US-made Virginia-class nuclear submarines it is buying from 2032.

“This really takes it out of the sort of America First criticism of security agreements … where President Trump felt that other countries weren’t pulling their own weight,” he said. “It’s a case that is very unique that the prime minister can articulate. [Albanese] is a very personable and socially savvy person, kind of like [UK Prime Minister] Keir Starmer, who does seem to have succeeded with the personal interaction. [A visit] would be great.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109236

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23260808 (010949ZJUL25) Notable: Video: Identity of alleged childcare paedophile revealed as 1200 children urged to undergo STI tests – Melbourne childcare worker Joshua Dale Brown, 26, has been charged with more than 70 offences including child rape, with police alleging he abused eight children aged between five months and two years at a Point Cook centre. Authorities have urged about 1200 children to undergo precautionary STI testing after Brown, who tested positive for gonorrhea, was revealed to have worked at 20 centres since 2017. Premier Jacinta Allan said she was “sickened” by the allegations. Brown remains in custody ahead of a September court hearing as investigations widen.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Identity of alleged childcare paedophile revealed as 1200 children urged to undergo STI tests

Cassandra Morgan - July 1, 2025

1/2

The identity of a Melbourne childcare worker charged with more than 70 offences, including child rape, has been revealed, as authorities say 1200 children should get tested for infectious diseases.

The Health Department is recommending that the children undergo testing after childcare worker Joshua Dale Brown, a 26-year-old from Point Cook, was charged over the alleged abuse of eight children.

His eight alleged victims, who were aged between five months and two years old, attended Creative Garden Early Learning Centre in Point Cook between April 2022 and January 2023, police said.

The families of the eight have been notified, and since Brown’s arrest on May 12, sexual crimes squad detectives have led a significant investigation into Brown, police said.

Brown worked at 20 childcare centres between January 2017 and May this year, including in Melbourne’s west and north-west, Bundoora in the north-east and Geelong. Detectives are investigating an allegation that Brown committed more offences at another childcare centre in Essendon, police said.

“This matter is being investigated as a priority,” Victoria Police said.

A police source, speaking on the condition of anonymity because they were not authorised to speak publicly, told this masthead that Brown had tested positive for gonorrhea.

The Health Department contacted about 2600 families, parents, children and carers of children following the allegations, and recommended about 1200 children undergo testing for infectious diseases, Chief Health Officer Christian McGrath said on Tuesday.

“Families and the wider community can be reassured that the infections that the children were potentially exposed to can be treated with antibiotics, and there’s no broader public health risk to the community,” McGrath said.

“A dedicated advice and support hotline has been set up to provide families with health and screening information, as well as linking them to specialist supports, including mental health and wellbeing services.”

By midday on Tuesday, parents were reporting long delays on hold for the Health Department’s hotline. One parent of a child at the Point Cook centre said he waited more than 1½ hours.

Not all children who attended the childcare centres where Brown worked would need to be tested, McGrath said.

The department was co-ordinating with laboratories around Melbourne to ensure the testing was done as quickly as possible, the chief health officer said.

Brown was not known to police before officers raided his home and later charged him, police Crime Command Acting Commander Janet Stevenson said on Tuesday.

He had a valid Working with Children Check, which has since been cancelled. He was co-operative with police, and working as a childcare worker at the time of his arrest, Stevenson said.

“He may have held other roles throughout his employment, though,” she said.

The police investigation was “proactive” and happened after officers allegedly discovered Brown had child abuse material. Police then had to track down the alleged victims.

“We didn’t have a victim for quite some time,” Stevenson said.

Premier Jacinta Allan became emotional as she said she was sickened by the allegations of abuse.

“They are shocking and distressing, and my heart just breaks for the families who are living every parent’s worst nightmare,” Allan said.

The early childhood regulator would immediately start an investigation into the conduct of the early education providers where the alleged offender worked, Allan said.

A mother who went to collect her son from the Creative Garden Early Learning Centre at Point Cook on Tuesday morning said she was horrified to receive the letter.

“I was so mad, I was so angry,” she told reporters.

She saw the alleged abuser at the centre multiple times, always with a smile on his face and coloured hair, she said.

The mother was concerned about what could have gone on with her son at the centre, without her knowing.

“It’s just the thought as a parent that will haunt me forever,” she said.

A mother named Liz, who declined to give her last name, said she just wanted a photo of the offender so she could show it to her daughter to gauge her reaction. As of 2pm she was still waiting on the Health Department for more information.

A third parent said he was considering pulling his child out of the Point Cook centre, that he was furious and that he thought the working with children check system was a farce. He said he had heard about the allegations on the news, which is what made him go to the centre to pick up his child.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109237

File: dd71d78490c3fc6⋯.jpg (269.27 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: cf25cf9fefdf5ac⋯.jpg (345.57 KB,750x970,75:97,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 22bec06a2e01a38⋯.jpg (301.17 KB,2048x1718,1024:859,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23260836 (011003ZJUL25) Notable: Penny Wong in Washington for key talks amid US alliance concerns – Foreign Minister Penny Wong has arrived in Washington for a Quad meeting with her counterparts from the US, India and Japan, calling it a chance to support a “peaceful, stable and prosperous Indo-Pacific.” The visit comes as Australia faces tariffs on exports to the US, a Pentagon review of AUKUS, and continued pressure to lift defence spending to 3.5 per cent of GDP. Wong reaffirmed the US is Australia’s “closest ally and principal strategic partner.” The Trump administration has taken a hard line on Beijing, with Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth warning of an “imminent” threat.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109234

Penny Wong in Washington for key talks amid US alliance concerns

JOSEPH OLBRYCHT-PALMER - 1 July 2025

Australia’s chief diplomat has touched down in Washington for a key meeting with her Quad counterparts as the Trump administration looks to ramp up pressure on China.

The Quad, made up of Australia, India, Japan and the US, is a partnership broadly seen as a check on China’s economic and military might.

“Fantastic to arrive in Washington DC ahead of the Quad Foreign Ministers’ Meeting,” Foreign Minister Penny Wong posted on social media, along with a photo of her and Australian ambassador Kevin Rudd.

“Thank you (State Secretary Marco Rubio) for hosting our second meeting in six months.

“Looking forward to discussing how we continue to support a peaceful, stable and prosperous Indo-Pacific.”

The meeting comes as pressure mounts on the Albanese government to bolster Australia’s alliance with the US.

Six months have passed since Donald Trump’s inauguration and Anthony Albanese is yet to secure an in-person meeting with the US President.

Australian producers have been slugged with tariffs on most exports to the US, including duties of up to 50 per cent on steel and aluminium, and doubts loom large about the Trump administration’s commitment to AUKUS after it launched a snap review of the defence pact.

The Albanese government has also refused to budge after Washington’s call to hike defence spending to 3.5 per cent of GDP amid alarm over China’s military build-up.

Unless the Prime Minister books a Washington trip, his next most-likely opportunity to meet Mr Trump is at the Quad leaders summit tipped for September.

In a statement announcing the trip on Sunday, Senator Wong said the US “is our closest ally and principal strategic partner”.

“Our alliance contributes to the peace, prosperity and stability of our countries and the region we share,” she said.

“We will continue to work together to further our important economic and security partnership and advance our mutual interests.”

Former US president Joe Biden was last year caught on a hot mic telling his fellow Quad leaders that China was “testing” them, giving a rare glimpse into the candid nature of talks between some of the region’s key players.

“We believe (Chinese President) Xi Jinping is looking to focus on domestic economic challenges and minimise the turbulence in China’s diplomatic relationships, and he’s also looking to buy himself some diplomatic space, in my view, to aggressively pursue China’s interest,” Mr Biden said.

“China continues to behave aggressively, testing us all across the region, and it’s true in the South China Sea, the East China Sea, South China, South Asia and the Taiwan Straits.

“It’s true across the scope of our relationship, including on economic and technology issues.”

Mr Biden’s bluntness was a stark contrast to how other Quad leaders have tried to frame the strategic four-way dialogue, often deflecting suggestions that it exists to counter China.

The hawkish approach to Beijing has been adopted by the Trump administration, with US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth earlier this month warning of an “imminent” threat to the Indo Pacific.

Mr Hegseth said China could invade Taiwan as early as 2027.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/breaking-news/penny-wong-in-washington-for-key-talks-amid-us-alliance-concerns/news-story/7260a410c8b4d33d724966ba0045b090

https://x.com/SenatorWong/status/1939857983992955142

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109238

File: 3c536cc22973d26⋯.jpg (322.34 KB,1024x683,1024:683,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 12c96365a3024d0⋯.jpg (95.83 KB,1000x686,500:343,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23265063 (020959ZJUL25) Notable: Arrested childcare worker accused of contaminating food with bodily fluids as authorities unveil crackdown – Victorian Premier Jacinta Allan has announced a childcare crackdown after new allegations that Joshua Dale Brown, 26, added bodily fluids to food at a Point Cook centre. Brown, already charged with more than 70 offences including child rape, allegedly abused eight children and worked at 20 centres since 2017, prompting STI testing for over 1200 children. From September 26, centres must ban smartphones or face fines of up to $50,000, alongside a new statewide register of childcare workers. Authorities admitted existing safety checks had failed, with national reforms now under review.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109236

Arrested childcare worker accused of contaminating food with bodily fluids as authorities unveil crackdown

Cassandra Morgan and Rachel Eddie - July 2, 2025

1/2

Victorian authorities have announced a crackdown on the childcare industry, as horrifying new details emerge about the alleged abuse by a Melbourne childcare worker.

One of the charges against Joshua Dale Brown is that he recklessly contaminated goods to cause alarm or anxiety, which relates to allegations he added bodily fluids to children’s food.

The 26-year-old is accused of abusing eight young children at a Point Cook centre between April 2022 and January 2023. His work at 20 facilities over his eight-year career has sparked the testing of more than 1200 children for sexually transmitted infections.

The Victorian Health Department has recommended the testing out of “an abundance of caution”.

“There’s not no risk, which is why we are making this recommendation,” Chief Health Officer Dr Christian McGrath said on Wednesday.

Ingesting bodily fluids is generally considered low risk in transmitting STIs, however cuts or sores in the gums, mouth or throat are a risk factor, so authorities are proceeding with utmost precaution.

McGrath said “several hundred” families had already been referred for testing based on a case-by-case risk assessment.

It comes as Premier Jacinta Allan on Wednesday unveiled a suite of measures including fines of up to $50,000 if childcare centres do not ban their workers from carrying smartphones, as officials scramble to bolster the “failing” system.

A ban on smartphones will be enforced from September 26. If a provider does not sign up to the ban, they will have conditions added to their licence. Breaches will attract fines of up to $50,000.

Phone bans are already part of a national framework used within early childhood education and care, but providers must choose to enforce the ban.

“To avoid delay, we’ll be putting all Victorian childcare centres on notice. They will be required to adopt this ban on personal devices,” Allan told reporters on Wednesday.

The state government will also commission an urgent review into childcare safety. A leader for the review will be appointed by the end of the week.

“This will be a short, sharp piece of work that will focus on the immediate actions that we can take, based on that body of work that is going on across Commonwealth and state and territory jurisdictions, but also, too, looking at what further can be done with a sense of urgency,” Allan said.

Victoria will start building a statewide register of childcare workers, which is also being considered at a national level.

“I appreciate there is a substantial amount of work that is already under way across the Commonwealth and state and territory governments to strengthen the safety in the sector here in Victoria, [but] I won’t wait,” Allan said. “Families cannot wait.”

Earlier on Wednesday, federal Education Minister Jason Clare revealed he put child safety on the agenda last Friday during a meeting with his state-based colleagues, after he was briefed on the Melbourne childcare worker charged with more than 70 sex offences against children in his care.

The families of the eight alleged victims were informed last week, but parents of other children were not told until Tuesday this week.

“I was informed about this just over a week ago by the Victorian government. It’s the reason I put this on the agenda for education ministers when we met last Friday,” Clare told ABC Radio National on Wednesday.

“I’m certain that the Victorian government took the steps that they needed to take with police and with the relevant authorities, to make sure that when they advised parents and did so as soon as they possibly could, they were in a position to provide the necessary advice and support for parents.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109239

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23265073 (021005ZJUL25) Notable: Sex abuse investigation nets second man known to alleged childcare rapist – A second man, Michael Simon Wilson, 36, has been charged with 45 child sex offences, including rape and possession of child abuse material, following the same investigation that led to the arrest of former childcare worker Joshua Dale Brown. Police say Wilson and Brown are known to each other, though their exact connection is unclear. Wilson’s charges involve separate victims and are not linked to childcare centres. He will face court in September on the same day as Brown, who is accused of abusing eight children at a Point Cook centre.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109236

>>109238

Sex abuse investigation nets second man known to alleged childcare rapist

Carla Jaeger - July 2, 2025

Warning: Graphic and distressing content

A second man has been charged with dozens of sex crimes against children, including rape, as part of a major investigation that also uncovered the separate abuse allegations at a Melbourne childcare centre.

The accusations against Michael Simon Wilson, which have not been publicly revealed before, are not related to any childcare facilities and involve different alleged victims to those identified in the case against former childcare worker Joshua Dale Brown.

Wilson and Brown are known to each other – although their exact connection is unclear – and both were charged as a result of information obtained by detectives from the sex crimes squad that led to a police raid on Brown’s house and his arrest in mid-May.

Court records show Wilson, 36, from Hoppers Crossing, is due to appear in court in September on the same day as Brown to face 45 charges, including rape and possession of child abuse material.

Police confirmed some of the charges related to the alleged sexual assault of a teenage boy in Coburg in April and the subsequent investigation.

Wilson has previously been charged with assault, possession of a controlled weapon and property damage, and served a noncustodial sentence with mandated men’s behaviour change therapy.

He lived alone but had been active on dating websites, on which he spoke of recently leaving a long-term relationship.

He had helped run an amateur hobby club until abruptly leaving two months ago, fellow members said.

One former colleague from Wilson’s time working in waste management in Melbourne described him as “a bit strange”, but “alright”.

Wilson’s phone was off, and his immediate family did not answer calls from this masthead.

Victoria Police and the state government announced on Tuesday that Brown, 26, had been charged with 70 counts related to abuse he allegedly perpetrated against eight child victims, some as young as five months, at the Creative Garden Early Learning Centre in Point Cook between April 2022 and January 2023.

Brown has worked at 20 childcare centres since starting in the industry in 2017, and more than 1200 children are being tested for sexually transmitted diseases amid allegations that Brown could have exposed them to STIs.

Detectives are also probing Brown’s time as an educator at Essendon Papilio Childcare Centre, where he had worked from February until just before his arrest on May 12.

When police raided his house in May, the 26-year-old had no criminal record and held a valid working with children check.

No other childcare workers are suspected of being involved in the alleged abuse and police have said they did not believe abuse took place at all the centres where Brown worked. So far, identified victims are between five months and two years old.

The discovery of child abuse material allegedly in Brown’s possession has mobilised a police and Health Department response over the past few weeks as officials raced to identify victims, inform affected families and launch a large child-testing regimen.

One of the charges against Brown is that he recklessly contaminated goods to cause alarm or anxiety – relating to allegations he added bodily fluids to children’s food.

On Tuesday, Victoria Police took the rare step of naming Brown to ensure parents were informed about the situation, but have said they cannot comment further on the Wilson case.

The Victorian government has ordered the early childhood regulator to investigate the conduct of the childcare operators for which Brown worked.

https://www.theage.com.au/national/victoria/second-man-charged-with-child-rape-in-wider-abuse-investigation-20250702-p5mbwr.html

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m9KFdoPUcRY

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109240

File: 1d6a5d0a3bc8322⋯.jpg (223.11 KB,2047x1152,2047:1152,Clipboard.jpg)

File: d687f4c49a5d10f⋯.jpg (250.17 KB,2047x1152,2047:1152,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23265081 (021012ZJUL25) Notable: ‘Vehicle for action’: Marco Rubio pushes for stronger critical mineral supply chain ahead of Quad meeting – US Secretary of State Marco Rubio has urged the Quad to move beyond “ideas and concepts” and become a “vehicle for action,” highlighting secure critical mineral supply chains as a priority. Meeting with counterparts Penny Wong, Takeshi Iwaya and Subrahmanyan Jaishankar in Washington, Rubio said concrete steps were needed to address shared economic and security challenges. Wong stressed the partnership’s importance against “escalating competition,” while Iwaya and Jaishankar underscored the Indo-Pacific’s role as a global growth engine and the need to uphold a rules-based order.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109234

‘Vehicle for action’: Marco Rubio pushes for stronger critical mineral supply chain ahead of Quad meeting

JOE KELLY - 2 July 2025

1/2

Marco Rubio has sketched out his ambition to transform the Quadrilateral Security Dialogue into a “vehicle for action” rather than a forum for discussing “ideas and concepts” ahead of a meeting with his counterparts from India, Japan and Australia.

Penny Wong has flown into Washington to attend the Quad Foreign Ministers’ Meeting with the US Secretary of State, Japanese Foreign Minister Takeshi Iwaya and Indian Foreign Minister Subrahmanyan Jaishankar.

Senator Wong has arrived at a key moment in the alliance relationship with America, with Mr Rubio’s call for action at the Quad coming shortly after a request from Washington for Australia to lift its defence spending to 3.5 per cent of GDP and amid a snap 30-day review of the AUKUS agreement.

Mr Rubio said that he was reminded by his Quad counterparts that, in January, within an hour of being sworn in as Secretary of State, he had his first meeting with them. He said that India, Japan and Australia were “very important strategic partners and allies” and singled out the need to develop secure supply chains for critical minerals as top priority.

“We are honoured to host them today in this very important partnership that has developed over the years and that I think has really taken wing in the last few months,” Mr Rubio said in the State Department. “Together we have a lot of shared priorities, a lot of things we care about in the world.”

“I think there are many global problems but also problems that we face in our respective countries that can be solved by us co-operating together,” he said. “One of the challenges with something new like this is turning meetings and gatherings where we talk about ideas and concepts into a vehicle for action.”

He said that taking “concrete actions” was the “next step in this great partnership.” Mr Rubio said steps should be taken “in co-ordination with one another … for the benefit of our respective countries.”

He said co-ordinated action between Quad members would benefit other nations across the globe, saying it was not just about security but also economic development. “In fact, later today we will be hosting here in this building a number of companies … representing all four of our countries,” Mr Rubio said. “There are many topics that we can work on, focus on.”

A key issue which Mr Rubio said he was personally focused on was “diversifying the global supply chain of critical minerals. Not just access to the raw material. But also access to the ability to process and refine it into usable material.”

“Having a diverse and reliable global supply chain … is just one example of many that we can focus on,” he said. “That’s the hope for this partnership. That’s why it’s so important to host you here today.”

“It’s also important that in this forum – to turn it into one where we begin to focus on specific issues that we want to work together on and begin to deliver action on these issues,” he said. “And today’s the next step in that process.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109241

File: cc51bf0fc30dfc2⋯.jpg (365.34 KB,1616x1080,202:135,Clipboard.jpg)

File: ee18948a11bbbc3⋯.jpg (200.67 KB,1616x1080,202:135,Clipboard.jpg)

File: a708bc5efeb351b⋯.jpg (561.41 KB,3000x2058,500:343,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23265089 (021020ZJUL25) Notable: Trump administration expresses regrets for ditching Albanese meeting – Penny Wong says the Trump administration expressed regret over cancelling Anthony Albanese’s planned G7 meeting with Donald Trump, after the president left to address the Israel-Iran conflict. In Washington, Wong met US Secretary of State Marco Rubio for 45 minutes, where he affirmed AUKUS’s importance and did not repeat earlier demands for Australia to raise defence spending to 3.5 per cent of GDP. Wong said they discussed “the positive benefits of AUKUS” and cooperation on critical minerals. She dismissed claims Kevin Rudd was a barrier to a Trump meeting, which is yet to be rescheduled.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>73662 (pb)

>>109234

Trump administration expresses regrets for ditching Albanese meeting

Jake Evans and Brad Ryan - 2 July 2025

Foreign Minister Penny Wong says the Trump administration has expressed its regrets to her for missing a meeting with Prime Minister Anthony Albanese on the sidelines of the G7.

The senator also said the US secretary of state had recognised the "importance" of the AUKUS agreement to both nations during their 45-minute meeting — and that a demand made last month for Australia to lift its defence spending was not repeated.

Mr Albanese is yet to meet face-to-face with United States President Donald Trump eight months since his election win, and has faced criticism from the Coalition for not pushing harder to meet with him earlier.

The pair were due to meet in Canada last week at the G7 leaders' summit, but Mr Trump left abruptly as the conflict between Israel and Iran flared.

Senator Wong, who is in the United States for a "Quad" meeting between the US, Australia, India and Japan, said she used talks with US Foreign Secretary Marco Rubio to discuss a future meeting between Mr Albanese and Mr Trump.

"He expressed his regret for the fact that the meeting had to be rescheduled," she told Channel Nine.

"I obviously said we completely understood; I think the world understood the president had a fair bit to do, given what was occurring in the Middle East."

The foreign minister rejected suggestions that Australia's ambassador to the United States, Kevin Rudd, who Mr Trump once labelled "not the brightest bulb", was a hurdle to the pair meeting.

Senator Wong said Mr Rubio did not raise Mr Rudd with her.

Defence demands, AUKUS review and tariffs weigh on talks

The meeting comes as Australia navigates several issues that threaten to cause trouble domestically.

The US has openly demanded Australia lift its defence spending as soon as possible to 3.5 per cent of its GDP — about a $40 billion annual lift on current spending.

Senator Wong said Mr Rubio did not raise Australia's defence budget with her.

Australia's major defence partnership with the United Kingdom and the US is also under review by the Trump administration, which is concerned the country may not be able to deliver on its deal to provide Australia with nuclear-powered submarines.

Senator Wong said she and Mr Rubio discussed deepening cooperation across the alliance, "including through AUKUS".

"We had a good discussion about the work we do together, we had a good discussion about AUKUS, and a good discussion about the positive benefits of AUKUS to [Australia, the US and the UK]," Senator Wong said.

"We both understand the importance to both our countries and to the United Kingdom."

Earlier this year, before the announcement of a US review into AUKUS led by sceptic Elbridge Colby, Mr Rubio said AUKUS had the "very strong support" of the Trump administration.

Meanwhile, the conversation of tariffs on foreign imports to the US looms large over trade discussions, and while the government believes the 50 per cent tariffs on steel and aluminium are unlikely to have a major impact, punishing tariffs on China could hurt Australia if Chinese demand for Australian goods falls as a consequence.

The senator said the Quad had also discussed strengthening cooperation on developing critical minerals supply chains, a "strategic vulnerability" that Senator Wong said Australia could do more to develop.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-07-02/trump-administration-regrets-ditching-albanese-meeting/105484286

https://x.com/SecRubio/status/1940193345575559461

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109242

File: f12be4540ca8b9e⋯.jpg (2.93 MB,4032x3024,4:3,Clipboard.jpg)

File: dc1f77b26a4ec70⋯.jpg (430.75 KB,1241x1754,1241:1754,Clipboard.jpg)

File: a329f49acc2894f⋯.jpg (439.7 KB,1241x1754,1241:1754,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 1808716f19fa00a⋯.jpg (138.49 KB,1241x1754,1241:1754,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23265100 (021040ZJUL25) Notable: Federal Court orders series of Islamic preacher Wissam Haddad's lectures be removed from social media – The Federal Court has ruled that lectures by Sydney preacher Wissam Haddad, delivered at Bankstown’s Al Madina Dawah Centre, contained “fundamentally racist and antisemitic” material and must be removed from social media. Justice Angus Stewart found the speeches breached the Racial Discrimination Act by portraying Jews as “wicked,” “vile,” and “descendants of apes and pigs,” rejecting Haddad’s defence that they drew only on scripture. The judge said the imputations were “devastatingly offensive,” with serious effects on Jewish Australians. Haddad must also post corrective notices for 30 days, with costs likely awarded to the ECAJ.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109228

Federal Court orders series of Islamic preacher Wissam Haddad's lectures be removed from social media

Jamie McKinnell - 1 July 2025

1/2

A series of lectures delivered by an Islamic preacher at a Sydney prayer centre must be removed from social media under orders from a Federal Court judge who found they contained "fundamentally racist and antisemitic" material.

Wissam Haddad, who is also known as Abu Ousayd, gave the speeches at Bankstown's Al Madina Dawah Centre in November 2023.

In the Federal Court, the Executive Council of Australian Jewry (ECAJ) alleged he contravened the Racial Discrimination Act, including by portraying Jewish people as "wicked", "scheming", "vile", "mischievous" and "descendants of apes and pigs".

Mr Haddad's lawyers argued the speeches were derived in substance from religious texts including the Koran, were delivered only to a Muslim audience in private and did not refer to Australian Jewish people.

Justice Angus Stewart today found the speeches contravened the Racial Discrimination Act and rejected Mr Haddad's defences.

The court found the series of lectures conveyed "disparaging imputations" about Jewish people, based on race or ethnic origin, that were reasonably likely to offend, insult, humiliate and intimidate Jews in Australia.

"The imputations include age-old tropes against Jewish people that are fundamentally racist and antisemitic; they make perverse generalisations against Jewish people as a group," the judge said in a summary of his decision.

Effects on Jewish Australians 'profound and serious'

In his full judgment, Justice Stewart said the established imputations — or meanings — were "devastatingly offensive and insulting".

He said Jewish people in Australia would have experienced the comments to be harassing and intimidating, "all the more so" because they were made at a time of "heightened vulnerability and fragility".

"That is because of their profound offensiveness and the long history of persecution of Jews associated with the use of such rhetoric," Justice Stewart said.

"Those effects on Jews in Australia would be profound and serious."

The court found passages in an interview and sermon by Mr Haddad contained critical and disparaging things about the actions of the Israel Defense Forces in Gaza and about Zionists.

However, the judge found the "ordinary, reasonable listener" would not understand those things to be about Jewish people in general.

"That person would understand that not all Jews are Zionists and that disparagement of Zionism constitutes disparagement of a philosophy or ideology and not a race or ethnic group," Justice Stewart said.

"Also, political criticism of Israel, however inflammatory or adversarial, is not by its nature criticism of Jews in general or based on Jewish racial or ethnic identity.

"The conclusion that it is not antisemitic to criticise Israel is the corollary of the conclusion that to blame Jews for the actions of Israel is antisemitic; the one flows from the other."

Justice Stewart said he was satisfied Mr Haddad and the centre should be ordered to publish corrective notices on their social media accounts for 30 days, but will hear the parties further on the terms.

He said the ECAJ's case had been "overwhelmingly successful" and there was no reason why Mr Haddad should not have to pay costs.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109243

File: 5c13b111e078674⋯.jpg (270.33 KB,1920x1266,320:211,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23265108 (021047ZJUL25) Notable: Clinton, Gillard to headline Women UNLIMITED Leadership Summit – Hillary Clinton and Julia Gillard will headline the Women UNLIMITED Leadership Summit, set for 29 September–1 October across six Australian capital cities. Billed as the largest women-in-leadership event of its kind, the summit will feature Clinton speaking in person in Sydney and Canberra on navigating global challenges, while Gillard will appear via hologram to share lessons from her leadership journey. The program covers impact, resilience, diversity, women’s health in the workplace, and career acceleration, with contributions from figures including journalist Leigh Sales. Organisers say the event will fuel momentum toward more inclusive, purpose-driven leadership.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Clinton, Gillard to headline Women UNLIMITED Leadership Summit

insidestategovernment.com.au - 02/07/2025

Former U.S Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton and Australia’s first female Prime Minister, Julia Gillard AC, are set to headline the Women UNLIMITED Leadership Summit, scheduled for 29 September – 1 October.

The event, to be held across seven venues in six Australian capital cities, is poised to be the largest women in leadership event of its kind in Australia.

Organisers say the summit’s content is deeply curated to ignite new thinking, energise purpose-driven leadership and fuel collective momentum towards a more inclusive and empowered future.

The agenda features a powerful line-up of public servants, changemakers, and thought leaders who will share actionable leadership strategies.

Key Themes and In-depth Discussions:

The Women UNLIMITED Leadership Summit offers a deep dive into critical leadership areas, providing indispensable insights for today’s public sector and beyond.

• Leading with Impact and Navigating Complexity: Attendees will gain direct advice from global powerhouses. Former U.S Secretary Hillary Rodham Clinton will be joining the summit in person in Sydney and Canberra, with her session also being livestreamed to other locations. She will share lessons on leading with impact when stakes are highest and effectively managing diverse personalities and evolving global challenges. Julia Gillard AC, Australia’s first and only woman Prime Minister, will reflect on her leadership journey and offer her vision for sustained progress and leading with strength in uncertain times via groundbreaking hologram technology. Journalist Leigh Sales AM will contribute insights on success, strength, and resilience, drawn from her extensive experience interviewing world leaders and powerful

figures.

• Diversity, Inclusion & Allyship: Delve into the profound impact of bias in the workplace, uncovering unconscious biases that leaders might overlook, and providing practical methods to lead with allyship to foster safer, more inclusive teams. Sessions are also dedicated to neuro-inclusive leadership, focusing on how neurodivergent traits can enhance leadership skills, creativity and problem-solving and how to build workplace cultures that celebrate and leverage diverse neurological perspectives.

• Authentic Leadership & Resilience: Participants will explore the power of bringing their whole selves to leadership, understanding how authenticity contributes to high performance and psychological safety and the creation of open and honest workplace cultures. The agenda also includes sessions on adapting to challenges and building personal and team resilience, with speakers sharing their experiences of reframing failure and overcoming challenges.

• Critical Topics Affecting Women in the Workplace: A crucial element of the summit is its direct engagement with women’s health and safety issues in leadership. Panel discussions will address the often-unspoken impact of women’s health conditions, caring responsibilities, mental health stigma, menopause, endometriosis and fertility on career progression and confidence. These discussions aim to equip leaders with practical steps to foster psychologically safe and health-aware workplace cultures.

• Career Acceleration & Practical Application: The summit emphasises real-world learning, featuring practical examples and case studies from some of the most senior and accomplished women in the Public Sector. Interactive sessions such as ‘Networking UNLIMITED’ provide structured opportunities for attendees to build valuable connections and engage in conversations about their leadership journeys, setting goals and receiving peer feedback. Furthermore, attendees gain access to two exclusive post-summit online seminars, which form part of a three-month learning journey. These sessions, focused on ‘Presenting with Power for Women in Leadership’ and ‘Building Trusted & High-Performing Teams’, are designed to enhance summit takeaways and provide practical tools for professional development beyond the event itself.

The summit will run from 29-30 September 2025 in Canberra at the National Convention Centre, with concurrent summits taking place from 30 September – 1 October 2025 in Sydney, Melbourne, Brisbane, Adelaide, and Perth.

https://www.insidestategovernment.com.au/clinton-gillard-to-headline-women-unlimited-leadership-summit/

https://womenunlimited.co/

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109244

File: 834705c2bb1df2a⋯.mp4 (9.23 MB,640x360,16:9,Clipboard.mp4)

File: 46d3c04c3d2ee3e⋯.jpg (390.74 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23265116 (021054ZJUL25) Notable: Video: Kanye West officially banned from entering Australia – Rapper Kanye West, legally known as Ye, has been banned from entering Australia after releasing a song titled Heil Hitler. Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke confirmed his tourist visa had been cancelled, saying officials determined Australia “doesn’t need” imported Nazism or anti-Semitism. West, who is married to Australian-born Bianca Censori, had previously praised Adolf Hitler in media appearances and faced repeated calls for a ban from Jewish community leaders. Burke said freedom of speech did not extend to foreign visitors promoting hatred. The decision prevents West accompanying Censori on visits to her Melbourne family.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Kanye West officially banned from entering Australia

The controversial musician, who is married to an Australian, has officially been banned from entering the country.

Samantha Maiden - July 2, 2025

Kanye West has officially been banned from Australia, and his tourist visa has been cancelled in the wake of an anti-Semitic song that referenced Adolf Hitler.

The bombshell decision means that he will be prohibited from entering the country with his Australian-born wife Bianca Censori, who grew up in Melbourne.

She was most recently in the country over the summer, but her husband remained in Japan at the time amid reported marital tensions.

News.com.au understands from government sources that the decision was made recently and communicated to Mr West, who has legally changed his name to Ye.

He had sought and obtained a tourist visa that could remain valid for up to 12 months, but it has now been cancelled.

Ye is the ex-husband of Kim Kardashian. He shares four children with his ex-wife, Kim Kardashian: North, Saint, Chicago, and Psalm.

Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke revealed his decision to cancel his visa on Wednesday afternoon, confirming it was cancelled after he released a song called Heil Hitler in May.

“He’s been coming to Australia for a long time and he’s made a lot of offensive comments,” Mr Burke said.

“But my officials looked at it again once he released the Heil Hitler song and he no longer has a valid visa in Australia.”

“It wasn’t a visa for the purpose of concerts. It was a lower level and the officials still looked at the law and said “you’re going to have a song and promote that sort of Nazism?”, we don’t need that in Australia.”

Asked on ABCTV if a ban on his visa was “sustainable” given his worldwide fame, Mr Burke said Australia would not tolerate anti-Semitism.

“I think that what’s not sustainable is to import hatred,’’ he said. “Some people say, oh, don’t you believe in freedom of speech and for Australian citizens, yeah, you’ve got full freedom of speech but we have enough problems in this country already without deliberately importing bigotry.”

Australia has repeatedly warned it may consider cancelling Mr West’s visa over his history of anti-Semitic rhetoric.

Originally, it followed Mr West’s decision to praise Adolf Hitler during an interview with far-right conspiracy theorist Alex Jones.

“I like Hitler,” West told Jones, later adding he saw “good things about Hitler”.

“I love Jewish people, but I also love Nazis.”

At the time, Labor frontbencher Jason Clare said to describe such comments as awful “would be an understatement”.

“I don’t know if he’s applied for a visa yet — but Google it, you will see that he seems like he’s a pretty big fan of a person who killed 6 million Jewish people last century,” Mr Clare told Channel 9.

“People like that who’ve applied for visas to get into Australia in the past have been rejected.

“I expect that if he does apply, he would have to go through the same process and answer the same questions that they did.”

The Australian Jewish Association has previously written to the government to demand that Mr West, who is legally known by the name of “Ye”, be banned from entering the country.

“He has become a lightning rod for extremists, for anti-Semites, for neo-Nazis as well, and he inspires a lot of young people — he has a massive following,” the association’s president, David Adler, said.

“He has a very strong record vilifying a segment of the community, namely, the Jewish community, he uses terms like going ‘DEFCON 3’ on the Jewish people.

“He’s used all sorts of anti-Semitic tropes — so yes, we think that’s a significant risk, and because of him being such a prominent and inspirational figure to youth, we think it is a risk in Australian society.”

https://www.news.com.au/entertainment/celebrity-life/kanye-west-officially-banned-from-entering-australia/news-story/188c56101fcad5dd579540f232e43915

https://x.com/ausvstheagenda/status/1940300324998455766

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109245

File: 53de783f3f76da2⋯.jpg (180.83 KB,1020x1918,510:959,Clipboard.jpg)

File: b489cd2ad21bb7d⋯.jpg (1.29 MB,4608x3072,3:2,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23269673 (030921ZJUL25) Notable: Accused paedophile Joshua Brown’s work history widens as evidence shows him at centre months earlier – The timeline of alleged offender Joshua Dale Brown’s childcare employment has widened after parents and records revealed he worked at Essendon Papilio Early Learning months earlier than authorities advised. Families were initially told Brown started in February, but evidence shows him at the centre in December and possibly as early as August. Similar discrepancies emerged at another facility in Footscray. Brown, 26, is in custody facing 70 charges, including child rape, while police investigate further offending. Authorities now expect many more families may need notification, with Affinity Education reviewing its records.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109236

>>109238

Accused paedophile Joshua Brown’s work history widens as evidence shows him at centre months earlier

Noel Towell - July 3, 2025

The work history of accused Melbourne paedophile Joshua Dale Brown has widened after errors emerged with the childcare worker’s employment dates supplied to families and the public.

Health authorities are expected to update official notifications of the dates Brown worked at certain centres on Thursday.

Parents at Essendon Papilio Early Learning in Melbourne’s north were scrambling for answers earlier this week after authorities advised them that Brown began working at the centre on February 17 and remained there until just days before his arrest on child sex abuse charges in May.

But this masthead has obtained evidence of Brown working at the daycare on December 13, more than two months before the date officially advised, and parents have said they recalled the alleged offender caring for children at Papilio as early as August.

The date discrepancy means that families whose children had contact with the 26-year-old before February 17 fell outside the time frame for official notification.

The exposure of Brown’s alleged offending prompted health authorities to notify 2600 families and call for the testing of 1200 children, and forced the state government to rush out a major overhaul of safety protocols for Victoria’s daycare centres.

But the fresh information means that many more families may now have to be notified that their children may have come into contact with Brown.

Doubts have also emerged over the supplied information on Brown’s time at D.O.T.S Occupational Therapy for Children in Footscray, where officials said he worked from March 1 to April 30 last year.

D.O.T.S director Hannah Dunn told this masthead: “This ex-employee was employed at D.O.T.S. from March 18 to April 24, 2024.”

Brown remains in custody facing 70 charges, including sexually penetrating a child under 12, attempting to sexually penetrate a child under 12, and producing child abuse material. Police are investigating allegations of further offending at the Essendon centre while he worked there.

Sources close to the information chain but not authorised to speak publicly said Brown’s work history was supplied by Papilio’s operator, national childcare giant Affinity Education, to Victoria Police early in their investigation. The government used these dates in its notification process and public communications.

The original dates supplied by Affinity were taken from a payroll database, but after other employee databases were searched for more information on Brown, an updated timeline has been sent to authorities.

A spokesperson for the company said it was still going through its records for material that might assist investigators.

“Given the serious nature of the matter, we are currently reviewing our records in detail to ensure completeness,” the spokesperson said.

“Affinity Education continues to co-operate fully with authorities and remains focused on the safety and wellbeing of the children and families in our care.”

A police spokesperson said online information would be updated as fresh details became available.

“As part of the ongoing investigation, information has been compiled from a number of sources and records in relation to Brown’s employment history,” the spokesperson said.

That information, including dates and locations, was released on Tuesday based on what was known at that time.

https://www.theage.com.au/national/victoria/accused-paedophile-joshua-brown-s-work-history-widens-as-photos-show-him-at-centre-months-earlier-20250703-p5mcac.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109246

File: 76fb31aae032e9e⋯.jpg (87.55 KB,1280x719,1280:719,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 497505f003aa4b3⋯.jpg (84.24 KB,1289x725,1289:725,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 44459cdc0853f51⋯.jpg (156.86 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 37d1104050c4e89⋯.jpg (182.27 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23269684 (030927ZJUL25) Notable: First photo of alleged child rapist Michael Simon Wilson revealed – The identity of Michael Simon Wilson, 36, has been publicly revealed after he was charged with child rape and bestiality offences in April. Wilson is reportedly known to Joshua Dale Brown, the Melbourne childcare worker accused of abusing eight children, though his alleged crimes involve separate victims and no childcare centres. Police allege Wilson raped a teenage boy in Hoppers Crossing. Both men are due in court on September 15. The cases have triggered urgent childcare reforms, with Premier Jacinta Allan and Education Minister Jason Clare pledging tougher checks, phone bans, and safety reviews.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109236

>>109239

First photo of alleged child rapist Michael Simon Wilson revealed

Duncan Evans - July 3, 2025

The full identity of an alleged child rapist, linked to a Victorian childcare worker charged with child sexual abuse, has been revealed.

Michael Simon Wilson, 36, was charged with child rape and bestiality offences in April, with a first image released of the man on Thursday.

The publication of Mr Wilson’s charges followed confirmation of charges against childcare worker Joshua Brown on Tuesday.

Victorian Police charged Mr Brown with 70 offences after he allegedly abused eight children at a Point Cook childcare centre in Melbourne.

It is alleged some children were as young as five months.

A widespread investigation has now been launched, with Victoria’s chief health officer saying 1200 children have been recommended to undergo infectious diseases testing as a precaution.

He is also accused of using his bodily fluids to tamper with food, news.com.au reported.

Mr Wilson and Mr Brown are reportedly known to each other, though the nature of the relationship is unclear.

Mr Wilson’s alleged offences are not believed to involve childcare centres or any of Mr Brown’s alleged victims.

Police allege he raped a teenage boy in Hoppers Crossing in April.

On Thursday, the Herald Sun reported it was the investigation into Mr Wilson’s alleged offending that led them to Mr Brown.

Mr Brown was arrested on May 12 and is due to appear at Melbourne Magistrates Court on September 15.

Mr Wilson will appear at Melbourne Magistrates Court on the same day.

The charges have sparked urgent calls for reform in the childcare sector, with Victorian Premier Jacinta Allan promising immediate action.

The state government will immediately begin building a register for childcare workers, she said, and will bring forward a policy to ban personal devices in centres.

“To avoid delay, we’ll be putting all Victorian childcare centres on notice,” she said.

“They will be required to adopt this ban on personal devices, effective from September 26.

“Childcare centres who don’t comply with this ban will have this placed on them as a condition of licence and may face fines of up to $50,000.

The premier will also commission an “urgent review” into childcare safety, with more details expected at the end of the week.

The review will examine the possibility of installing CCTV cameras in centres and the deploying a “four eyes” principle, meaning children should not be left alone with a single adult.

It will also review whether the five-year working with children check time frame should be shortened.

Federal Education Minister Jason Clare said on Wednesday the problem of predators in childcare settings was “serious” and required “serious action”.

“It’s one of the reasons why I put this on the top of the agenda when education ministers met last week,” he said.

“Let me be clear – when education ministers met to discuss child safety last week, we didn’t discuss this case, but we discussed – what are the next steps that we need to take as a nation to make sure that our kids are safe in early education and care?”

The federal government has already banned personal mobile phones in centres and changed rules around mandatory reporting from seven days to 24 hours following complaints about sexual or physical abuse.

Mr Clare promised further reforms, including cutting off funding for centres that fail to meet minimum standards.

He also flagged changes to background checks for workers.

“It’s taken too long to do the work necessary to make sure that our Working with Children Check system is up to scratch,” he said.

“I’ve spoken a number of times with the Attorney-General, Michelle Rowland, the new Attorney-General, and I think I can safely speak on her behalf – she agrees, and is determined to take the action necessary here to make sure that our working with children checks across the nation are up to scratch.

“That’ll be something that will be discussed by Attorneys-General when they meet next month.”

He cautioned that a working with children check was not a “silver bullet”.

“In too many examples, a perpetrator is eventually caught and arrested and sentenced, there’s somebody that got a Working with Children Check because they had no prior criminal record,” he said.

“And so it’s only one of the things that we need to focus on here if we’re serious about making sure that we keep our kids safe.”

https://www.news.com.au/national/victoria/courts-law/first-photo-of-alleged-child-rapist-michael-simon-wilson-revealed/news-story/47ba798e0c91e521b13ea6f027e7fab3

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109247

File: 26d2f152456f973⋯.jpg (162.11 KB,1396x785,1396:785,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 4e0c9393e6a191b⋯.jpg (603.97 KB,5398x3599,5398:3599,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 36216422f17053b⋯.jpg (309.02 KB,750x773,750:773,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23269714 (030945ZJUL25) Notable: Elon Musk’s X wins ‘free speech’ fight against eSafety Commissioner – The Administrative Review Tribunal has overturned an order by eSafety Commissioner Julie Inman-Grant requiring Elon Musk’s X to remove a post insulting trans activist Teddy Cook. Deputy president Damien O’Donovan ruled the post did not meet the legal threshold for adult cyber-abuse, saying intent to cause serious harm was not proven. X’s lawyer Justin Quill called it “a win for free speech in Australia,” accusing the commissioner of overreach. eSafety said it welcomed the ruling’s guidance but would continue tackling online harms. The case comes as the government prepares to introduce a social media ban for under-16s.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Elon Musk’s X wins ‘free speech’ fight against eSafety Commissioner

Alexander Darling and Erin Pearson - July 1, 2025

1/2

Lawyers for social media platform X have declared a judgment that found in X’s favour against the eSafety Commissioner “a win for free speech in Australia”.

On Tuesday, the Administrative Review Tribunal struck out an order by Australia’s eSafety Commissioner Julie Inman-Grant, which demanded that Elon Musk’s X remove a post that insulted a transgender Australian man.

The order was made in March 2024 and relates to an X post about trans rights activist Teddy Cook.

Chris Elston, known on X as Billboard Chris, misgendered and insulted Cook, equated transgender identity with mental illness, and linked to an article suggesting Cook was “too smutty” for intergovernmental work.

At the time, X complied with an order from Inman-Grant to hide the post from Australian users, but later lodged an appeal against the removal notice.

In his ruling, the tribunal’s deputy president Damien O’Donovan said he was not satisfied that the post met “the statutory definition of cyber-abuse material targeted at an Australian adult”.

In Australia, if online content is serious enough and the service or platform does not help the person affected, the eSafety Commissioner can direct the platform to remove it.

The statutory definition is that the offensive content in question must target a specific Australian adult (over 18 years old) and be both intended to cause serious harm, and menacing, harassing or offensive in all the circumstances.

“The more focused question is whether I can be satisfied that the necessary intention to cause serious harm to the subject of the post has been established,” he wrote in his ruling.

“Based on the evidence before me, I am not satisfied that it has. Consequently, the decision of the eSafety Commissioner to issue a removal notice is set aside.”

X was represented in court by Justin Quill, partner at major law firm Thomson Geer.

“This is a win for free speech in Australia,” Quill said in a statement on Tuesday night.

“It seems clear this is another example of the eSafety Commissioner overreaching in her role and making politically motivated decisions to moderate what she considers Australians should and shouldn’t read and hear from the outside world.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109248

File: 03b2979fbee0a4d⋯.jpg (203.33 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23269730 (030954ZJUL25) Notable: Chinese bases ‘not welcome’ in Pacific, says Fiji PM Sitiveni Rabuka – Fiji’s Prime Minister Sitiveni Rabuka told the National Press Club that Beijing should not be allowed to establish military bases in the Pacific, declaring: “Who would welcome them? Not Fiji.” Visiting Australia with senior ministers, he backed Labor’s plan to recruit Pacific Islanders into the ADF, saying Fijians could fill the force’s 5000 vacancies. Rabuka called for a treaty with Australia to elevate ties beyond “political whims” and endorsed cooperation on development and security. He also praised Xi Jinping’s domestic achievements while warning against coercion in the Pacific. Rabuka will observe Fiji’s participation in Talisman Sabre.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109224

>>109229

Chinese bases ‘not welcome’ in Pacific, says Fiji PM Sitiveni Rabuka

BEN PACKHAM - 3 July 2025

1/2

Fiji’s Prime Minister, Sitiveni Rabuka, has called on fellow Pacific leaders to resist Chinese efforts to establish a military base in the region as he backed Labor’s push to recruit Fijians to the Australian Defence Force and flagged a new bilateral treaty with Australia.

Amid surging efforts by China to expand its security footprint in the Pacific, the former coup leader said Beijing should not be allowed to secure a military outpost in the region.

“Who would welcome them? Not Fiji,” he told the National Press Club in Canberra on Wednesday. Mr Rabuka – one of the region’s most senior leaders – threw his support behind the Albanese government’s plan to recruit Pacific Islanders into the ADF, which is short more than 5000 personnel.

He said Fijians, more than 1500 of whom were serving in the British Army, could fill “the whole lot”.

“I would like to see it happen,” Mr Rabuka said.

Declaring the region’s outlook “more uncertain than at any time since Fiji’s independence in 1970”, Mr Rabuka said it was time to step up his country’s “Vuvale” (family) partnership with Australia to “an agreement or treaty”.

He said a bilateral treaty, which was being strongly backed by the Albanese government, would help address “neglected areas of development” while placing the countries’ relationship above politics.

“It will not be subject to the political whims of the winning parties in the various elections because there will be national treaties between sovereign states,” Mr Rabuka said.

The former military strongman, who has long been concerned about China’s growing influence in the Pacific, laid out a plan for a Pacific “ocean of peace” based on unity and co-operation among the region’s states.

In a veiled swipe at Beijing, he said Fiji expected “those from outside to respect our approaches and participate with us”. He said this meant respecting the “Pacific way”, refraining from “coercion” and respecting the environment.

“Right now, we are having to cope with a China that is big, really big, and has gotten powerful, and would probably like to spread its influence to the Pacific,” he said. “The Pacific leaders in all the recent discussions have tried to go for policies that are friendly to all and enemy to none. It is a fairly tough call to steer. But is it possible? We need to hold hands. We need to encourage each other to be able to maintain that view.”

At the same time, he acknowledged China’s President Xi Jinping was a “great leader” for his country, lifting standards and economic development for his people.

Mr Rabuka’s comments follow Beijing’s failed push for a region-wide security pact, its controversial 2022 security agreement with Solomon Islands and its repeated attempts to do a similar deal with Papua New Guinea.

The Fijian Prime Minister is in Australia for a six-day visit with his defence, security and immigration ministers. He and Anthony Albanese will watch the country’s Flying Fijians rugby union team go up against the Wallabies on Sunday.

Mr Rabuka also will visit a company of Fijian soldiers taking part in Australia’s biggest military exercise, Talisman Sabre – his country’s biggest contingent yet to join the biennial war games.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109249

File: 19f77df178785f1⋯.jpg (292.04 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 6a4053cf851cced⋯.jpg (294.22 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23269751 (031006ZJUL25) Notable: ‘No effective treatment’: man dies after first case of rare bat virus confirmed – A man in his 50s from northern NSW has died after contracting Australian bat lyssavirus, marking the first confirmed case in the state and only the fourth nationally since 1996. NSW Health said he was bitten by a bat several months ago and later hospitalised in critical condition. Authorities warned there is “no effective treatment” once symptoms begin, which progress rapidly to paralysis and death. In 2024, 118 people required medical assessment after bat bites or scratches. Officials urged the public to avoid handling bats and to seek urgent treatment if bitten.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

‘No effective treatment’: man dies after first case of rare bat virus confirmed

HOLLY TRUELOVE - 3 July 2025

A northern NSW man has died after being bitten by a bat, in the first confirmed case of Australian bat lyssavirus in NSW.

The man, in his 50s, was bitten by a bat several months ago and had been in a critical condition in hospital, but on Thursday NSW Health confirmed he had died.

“We express our sincere condolences to the man’s family and friends for their tragic loss,” NSW Health said in a statement.

Health authorities have urged people to stay away from bats, warning that there is “no effective treatment” for the rare virus – a close relative to the rabies virus.

The virus is transmitted from infected bat saliva to humans through a bat bite or scratch.

NSW Health Director in Health Protection Keira Glasgow described the case as “very tragic” and said further investigations were under way to understand if other factors contributed to the man’s illness.

“This is the first confirmed case of the virus in NSW, and the fourth case in Australia,” Ms Glasgow said.

“It is incredibly rare for the virus to transmit to humans, but once symptoms of lyssavirus start … sadly there is no effective treatment.”

Only three cases of human infection with bat lyssavirus (ABLV) have been recorded since the virus was first identified in 1996, according to NSW Health. All three cases were in Queensland and all died as a result of ABLV infection after bites or scratches by bats.

The early symptoms are flu-like, including headache, fever and fatigue. The illness progresses rapidly to paralysis, delirium, convulsions and death, usually within a week or two.

NSW Health said 118 people required medical assessment after being bitten or scratched by bats in 2024.

Anyone bitten or scratched by a bat should seek urgent medical assessment.

Ms Glasgow said people should wash the wound for 15 minutes and apply an antiseptic with antivirus action, before they are treated with rabies immunoglobulin and a rabies vaccine.

Australian bat lyssavirus can be found in species of flying foxes, fruit bats and insect-eating microbats.

Authorities are advising people who see a distressed, injured or trapped bat to contact WIRES (Wildlife Information, Rescue and Education Service - 1300 094 737) or a local wildlife rescue group.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/health/medical/no-effective-treatment-man-in-critical-condition-as-first-case-of-rare-bat-virus-confirmed/news-story/30cb3c5ecf056a0252d0dd9a1c1ddba9

https://www.wires.org.au/

https://www.wires.org.au/report-a-rescue

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109250

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23278899 (050618ZJUL25) Notable: Video: Crisafulli’s bid to bring Trump - and the Quad - to Queensland – Premier David Crisafulli has launched a push for Brisbane to host the Quad summit, arguing Queensland’s G20 experience and Olympic trajectory make it ideal. Speaking at an AmCham lunch, he said a smaller-scale gathering with Donald Trump, Narendra Modi and Shigeru Ishiba would deliver defence and investment opportunities, vowing to press the case in India and Japan. While he highlighted Brisbane firm Ferra Engineering’s F-35 parts production, protesters outside condemned Australia’s deepening military ties with the US and complicity in Gaza, warning of secretive deals and militarisation.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>73662

>>109234

Crisafulli’s bid to bring Trump - and the Quad - to Queensland

Cameron Atfield - July 4, 2025

Premier David Crisafulli has made an audacious bid to get US President Donald Trump to Queensland as he pushes the state’s claims to host the Quad leaders’ summit.

The Quad - Australia, the United States, Japan and India - has a stated goal of defending a free and open Indo-Pacific, but is widely seen as an attempt to contain China’s influence in the region.

With India hosting this year’s summit, the earliest Australia could host would be 2026.

The premier used an American Independence Day event in Brisbane to announce Queensland’s candidature if, as he expected, Australia was confirmed host.

Crisafulli told the American Chamber of Commerce in Australia (AmCham) lunch he had been persistent in his lobbying of Prime Minister Anthony Albanese, citing Brisbane’s experience of hosting the G20 leaders’ summit in 2014.

“It was amazing to see the world leaders here, but I’m not certain that Queensland quite got the buzz and the recognition, because it was so big,” he said.

“It was Obama and Putin and was just awe-inspiring, the amount of horsepower and personnel and the security detail, but sort of it blended a little bit into where it was.”

Crisafulli said that would not be the case with the Quad – even with Trump, it would be of a much smaller scale.

“Based on where things are at the moment geopolitically, who those partners are, where it will be, the fact that we’re about to become an Olympic city, the journey point where we are as a state, I think we can own it,” he said.

“The defence lens and the defence opportunities that come with that, and the investment opportunities, it would be a really big win for us and it’s something I’m really pinning our hopes on.

“I’m going to keep fighting pretty hard for it.”

Crisafulli said he would lead his first overseas delegation as premier within the next month to both India and Japan, during which Quad hosting rights would be “top of the agenda”.

Comment was sought from both Albanese and Foreign Minister Penny Wong.

While the American Chamber of Commerce (AmCham) celebrated July 4 inside the Brisbane Sofitel ballroom, a small band of protesters outside demonstrated against Australia’s military cooperation with Trump’s United States, including through AUKUS, and the ongoing war in Gaza.

Annette Brownlie, the chair of Independent and Peaceful Australia, was among the demonstrators.

“We’re very concerned about what sort of deals our premier might be doing with the American Chamber of Commerce,” she said.

“We don’t know what sort of contracts, etc, they will sign. We are deeply enmeshed in the American military industry – the F-35 fighter jets, parts of those fighter jets are made here in Brisbane.

“It implicates us and makes us complicit for the genocide that’s happening in Gaza and in Palestine.”

Ferra Engineering, based at Tingalpa in Brisbane’s east, manufactures components for the US’s F-35 Joint Strike Fighters and Crisafulli appeared to single it out while on stage.

“That’s one company employing 100 people doing one small element in the backblocks of Queensland,” he said.

“Now that’s a massive opportunity, and what we can do is make sure that we allow the private sector to do their job and invest in those partnerships that get people to look here [for investment].”

Along with Trump, Albanese would host his counterparts from India (Narendra Modi) and Japan (Shigeru Ishiba) at the security summit.

https://www.brisbanetimes.com.au/politics/queensland/crisafulli-s-bid-to-bring-trump-and-the-quad-to-queensland-20250703-p5mc7x.html

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IwvDtyr3XN0

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109251

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23278918 (050627ZJUL25) Notable: Video: Restaurant stormed and synagogue targeted in night of antisemitic attacks in Melbourne – A Melbourne synagogue was set on fire while 20 people, including children, were inside for Shabbat dinner, and Israeli restaurant Miznon was stormed by masked people shouting offensive chants, including “death to the IDF”. Firefighters quickly contained the synagogue blaze, captured on CCTV, but police are still searching for the arsonist. Premier Jacinta Allan, Lord Mayor Nicholas Reece and Jewish leaders condemned the attacks as cowardly, racist and dangerous. The Executive Council of Australian Jewry warned antisemitism is worsening, demanding perpetrators face the full force of the law.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Restaurant stormed and synagogue targeted in night of antisemitic attacks in Melbourne

Chip Le Grand - July 5, 2025

1/2

A Melbourne synagogue has been hit by an arson attack and an Israeli restaurant stormed by a violent group, some wearing the Palestinian keffiyeh, in a night of antisemitic attacks that have left Jewish people fearing for their safety.

Police have released an image of a man they wish to speak to in relation to the arson attack on the East Melbourne Synagogue on Friday night.

The man pictured is described as Caucasian, believed to be in his 30s, with a beard and long hair. He was last seen wearing a dark blue or black jumper, black pants, and a black beanie.

The arson attack on the synagogue was carried out while about 20 people, including children, were having a Shabbat dinner inside the place of worship.

Also on Friday night, a group of about 20 masked people entered Israeli restaurant Miznon and shouted offensive chants, scuffling with staff and knocking over tables to the alarm of patrons, before police arrived and arrested one man.

Vision from the incident shows diners screaming in fear inside the Hardware Lane restaurant, which is part-owned by an Israeli entrepreneur who has been promoting a controversial aid group in Gaza.

Premier Jacinta Allan has condemned the synagogue attack – now under investigation by Victoria Police – as disgraceful and cowardly.

“This is disgraceful behaviour by a pack of cowards,” Allan said on Saturday morning, as Jewish Australians woke to news of the attack. “That this happened on Shabbat makes it all the more abhorrent.

“Antisemitism has no place in Victoria and I stand with the Jewish community in their fight against hate, violence and fear.”

Jewish Community Council of Victoria president Phillip Zajac told this masthead that a lone arsonist used fuel to torch the front doors of the East Melbourne Synagogue in Albert Street about 8pm.

Firefighters responded quickly and contained the fire, which caused only superficial damage to the bluestone building and heavy timber doors. The attack was captured on CCTV.

Zajac said on Friday night that the perpetrator needed to be identified and prosecuted.

“I don’t know what the government can do but there have to be consequences for people who do things like this,” he said. “Lighting a place of worship [on fire] is just dreadful...

“A place of worship has got nothing to do with the Middle East dispute. This has really gotten to me. I don’t know what to say.”

Melbourne Lord Mayor Nicholas Reece attended the synagogue on Friday night after he learnt of the attack. He described the synagogue fire and targeting of Jewish businesses in the city as despicable and racist.

“The criminal attacks on Jewish businesses in the CBD and the East Melbourne Synagogue are shocking and should be condemned in the strongest possible terms,” he said. “I am angry and dismayed that once again our community is confronted with the despicable and racist actions of a few people.

“My thoughts are with the Jewish community, who are hurting deeply after these vile attacks. Everyone deserves the right to enjoy the most basic human acts, like practising your faith or enjoying a meal, without being attacked or vilified.”

Police confirmed about 20 people walked to the restaurant on Hardware Lane on Friday night and began shouting offensive chants, including “death to the IDF”.

“A 28-year-old person from Footscray was arrested for hindering police and has been released on summons,” police said in a statement issued just after midnight.

The “death to the IDF” chant was also heard in Melbourne’s Bourke Street Mall during last Sunday’s regular anti-Israel protest, and shouted from the Glastonbury stage in the UK by band Bob Vylan in its controversial performance.

The attack follows the firebombing in December that gutted the Adass Israel Synagogue in Ripponlea. No charges have been laid in that attack despite Victorian and federal police launching a joint taskforce investigation into the suspected terror attack.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109252

File: 6b6581bf5efbd79⋯.jpg (301.93 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 02bcb29ebbd7cf1⋯.jpg (242.09 KB,2048x1536,4:3,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 18607da338f3c70⋯.jpg (407.07 KB,2001x2668,3:4,Clipboard.jpg)

File: a6b670dccd6f9c4⋯.jpg (201.4 KB,2028x1141,2028:1141,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23278968 (050647ZJUL25) Notable: PM wants ‘full force of the law’ as Sussan Ley, Josh Frydenberg slam ‘hate’ in Melbourne anti-Jewish attacks – Anthony Albanese condemned Friday night’s synagogue arson and violent protest at Israeli restaurant Miznon, vowing anti-Semites “must face the full force of the law.” Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke called the attacks “evil,” while Opposition Leader Sussan Ley said, “This is not protest. This is hate.” Former treasurer Josh Frydenberg labelled it a “hate crime,” and opposition spokesman Julian Leeser called it “a very sad day for Australia.” Israel’s Deputy Foreign Minister Sharren Haskel branded the incidents “terrorism” and accused Canberra of weakness against rising antisemitism.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109251

PM wants ‘full force of the law’ as Sussan Ley, Josh Frydenberg slam ‘hate’ in Melbourne anti-Jewish attacks

RICHARD FERGUSON - 5 July 2025

1/2

Anthony Albanese has called on anti-Semites who terrorised Melbourne’s Jewish community on Friday night to face the “full force of the law”.

The Prime Minister has talked to Victorian police minister Anthony Carbines and been briefed by both ASIO and the federal police on Friday’s incidents.

The Prime Minister has made his first comments after a man tried to set the East Melbourne synagogue on fire while 20 people were inside having a Shabbat dinner, while in a separate incident, customers and staff a CBD restaurant were left screaming as rioters tried to break in while chanting “death to the IDF.”

Mr Albanese said in a statement that the Commonwealth would do everything it could to help the Victorian state government and Victoria police to find justice.

“Anti-Semitism has no place in Australia,” Mr Albanese said.

“Those responsible for these shocking acts must face the full force of the law and my government will provide all necessary support toward this effort.”

Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke has called the attacks “abhorrent” and “evil”.

Opposition Leader Sussan Ley also condemned the attacks, describing them as ‘horrifying’.

“This is not protest,” she wrote on social media platform X. “This is hate. And it has no place in Australia.” Other leaders including former Liberal treasurer Josh Frydenberg called for more action and protection against rising anti-Semitism.

Israel, meanwhile, weighed in, branding the firebombing attack on thesynagogue and a targeted protest at the restaurant as acts of “terrorism”, and accused Australia of failing to confront the surge of violent anti-Semitism.

Deputy Foreign Minister Sharren Haskel said the attacks were not only assaults on the Jewish and Israeli communities, but a threat to Australia’s democratic values.

“The horrifying attacks overnight on a synagogue and an Israeli business in Melbourne are yet another reminder of how far racist, antisemitic hate crimes have spread in the heart of Australia,” Ms Haskel said in a statement to The Australian.

“Targeting Jewish houses of worship and an Israeli restaurant is terrorism, aimed at intimidating an entire community simply because of their religion and identity. These attacks are not just assaults on Jews or Israelis – they are assaults on Australian values of tolerance, diversity, and freedom.”

Ms Haskel said the Australian government had failed to implement “real consequences” for individuals and groups spreading anti-Semitic hate and inciting violence, warning the “weakness” would only embolden extremists.

“Let me be clear: these attacks are happening because, for too long, there have been no real consequences for those spreading hate and inciting violence. Weakness and silence only embolden the extremists,” she said.

In a terrifying night for Melbourne’s Jewish community, police say a man entered the grounds of the East Melbourne Hebrew Congregation on Albert St about 8pm and poured flammable liquid over the front door before setting it alight then fleeing on foot.

Friday’s arson comes months after the Adass Israel Synagogue at Ripponlea was firebombed.

Counter-terrorism police in June executed raids across Melbourne’s northern suburbs as part of its months-long probe into the potential terrorist attack.

Police are yet to determine the motivation for the attack on East Melbourne Hebrew Congregation synagogue but confirmed arson chemists and detectives are reviewing CCTV footage and investigating the possibility of a hate crime.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109253

File: 782375229e50de3⋯.jpg (541.22 KB,2048x1536,4:3,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 7e83daab69ab558⋯.jpg (324.14 KB,2048x1536,4:3,Clipboard.jpg)

File: f935703b0c183fa⋯.jpg (256.19 KB,2048x1536,4:3,Clipboard.jpg)

File: b5f4b7ebddd45a6⋯.jpg (548.24 KB,2048x1536,4:3,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 856cc3394feb74f⋯.jpg (53.83 KB,650x1000,13:20,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23279036 (050729ZJUL25) Notable: Attempted synagogue firebombing no act of terror, say police – Victoria Police confirmed three anti-Semitic incidents in Melbourne, including an arson attack on East Melbourne Hebrew Congregation, but stopped short of declaring terrorism. Commander Zorka Dunstan said 20 worshippers escaped unharmed, while CCTV shows the suspect carrying a duffle bag before lighting the doors. Hours earlier, 20 protesters stormed Israeli-owned restaurant Miznon chanting “death to the IDF,” damaging property before police intervened. A third incident saw cars torched and spray-painted in Greensborough. All cases are under Counter-terrorism Command review, with police calling the crimes “abhorrent” but currently treating them as serious criminal acts.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109251

>>109252

Attempted synagogue firebombing no act of terror, say police

MOHAMMAD ALFARES and LYDIA LYNCH - 5 July 2025

1/2

Victoria Police have revealed a third anti-Semitic incident occurred in Melbourne on Saturday, as they stopped short of declaring the attempted firebombing of a synagogue a terrorist attack – despite confirming it was a targeted act that endangered 20 worshippers.

Addressing the media after releasing CCTV images of the suspected arsonist, Commander Zorka Dunstan said investigators were now examining three separate incidents, all under the scrutiny of the Counter-terrorism Command and local detectives.

The first, and most serious, was the deliberate arson attack on the East Melbourne Hebrew Congregation, where an unknown man allegedly poured a flammable liquid over the front doors and set them alight around 8.05pm Friday.

Twenty people inside the synagogue for a Shabbat dinner were forced to evacuate through a rear exit. No injuries were reported, but police confirmed the building’s entrance was significantly damaged.

“I’d like to make it very clear that we do recognise that these crimes are disgusting and abhorrent, but at this stage we are not declaring this a terrorist incident,” Commander Dunstan said.

“In the course of our investigation we will examine the intent and ideology of the person involved to determine if this is in fact terrorism. At the moment we are categorising it as a serious criminal incident and responding accordingly.”

The second incident occurred in Melbourne’s CBD, when a splinter group of pro-Palestinian protesters from a broader “No Police at Protest” rally stormed Miznon, an Israeli-owned restaurant on Hardware Lane, and disrupted diners.

Police arrived quickly and moved the demonstrators on. A 28-year-old Footscray man was arrested for hindering police and later released on summons.

A third, previously unreported incident occurred at 4.30am Saturday at a Greensborough business on Para Road, where three cars were set alight and spray-painted with graffiti. One vehicle was destroyed; the others were damaged.

“That business has been subject to some pro-Palestinian activity in the past, and that’s why we’ve made that connection at this time,” Commander Dunstan said.

“In saying that, we haven’t made a full connection. We’re just continuing to investigate, and we thought we’d just bring it to your attention at this time.

All three incidents are being reviewed for potential links by detectives and counterterrorism authorities.

Suspect image released

An image of the attempted synagogue firebombing suspect, captured just before 8pm on Friday night, shows a man walking past the synagogue’s front gate holding what appears to be a dark duffle bag.

“The man depicted is perceived as being Caucasian in appearance, is believed to be aged in his 30s with a beard and long hair,” police said in a statement.

“He is pictured wearing a dark blue or black jumper, black pants and a black beanie.”

Twenty people were inside having a Shabbat dinner on Friday at the time of the attack, while in a separate incident a group of keffiyeh-wearing protesters stormed a Jewish-owned restaurant in the CBD.

“Everyone inside self-evacuated through the rear of the building and there have been no reports of injuries,” Victoria Police said in a statement.

“Firefighters attended and extinguished the fire which was contained to the front entrance.

“Police are still working to establish the exact circumstances surrounding the fire including the motivation behind the incident. An arson chemist will be attending the scene and police are currently canvassing for CCTV footage.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109254

File: 61591a1c5adc8ac⋯.jpg (275.64 KB,2047x1152,2047:1152,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 15851c2e3b30050⋯.jpg (172.66 KB,1140x1766,570:883,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23279053 (050754ZJUL25) Notable: ‘Kindy cops’ sent in to police childcare as top operator installs CCTV cameras – The federal government will introduce laws allowing “kindy cops” to carry out unannounced inspections after a Melbourne childcare worker was charged with sexually abusing eight babies and toddlers, forcing 1200 children to undergo STI tests. Education Minister Jason Clare vowed to cut funding to centres prioritising profit over safety, calling delays in reform “too bloody long.” Goodstart Early Learning, Australia’s largest chain, is rolling out CCTV across 653 centres, while Early Childhood Australia warned staff shortages encourage corner-cutting. Clare dismissed calls to ban men from childcare, stressing systemic safeguards, not gender bans, are required.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109236

>>109238

‘Kindy cops’ sent in to police childcare as top operator installs CCTV cameras

NATASHA BITA - July 03, 2025

1/2

Commonwealth “kindy cops’’ will carry out snap inspections of childcare centres, as the nation’s biggest childcare chain installs CCTV cameras across hundreds of daycare centres.

New powers of entry for fraud officers to conduct unannounced spot checks of daycare centres will be part of childcare safety legislation to be introduced to federal parliament within weeks.

Federal Education Minister Jason Clare said it was “sickening and serious’’ that 1200 young children had to be tested for STDs this week after a Melbourne childcare worker was charged with allegedly sexually abusing eight babies and toddlers in his care. He said governments had taken “too bloody long’’ to fix child-safety risks in daycare centres and announced new laws to punish centres that “put profit over quality and put child safety at risk’’.

“The big weapon that the federal government has to wield here is the funding that we provide to childcare centres,’’ Mr Clare said.

“It equates to about 70 per cent of the funding that runs a centre, and if they’re not keeping our kids safe then we need to cut off their funding.’’

The change means fraud teams will no longer require a warrant, or be accompanied by Australian Federal Police, to check if centres are fraudulently claiming to care for “ghost” children to pocket taxpayer subsidies.

The legislation will give the federal Education Department the power to cut childcare subsidies to centres with “egregious and continued breaches’’ of child safety and quality rules.

Childcare operators that persistently fail to meet minimum standards for childcare will be banned from opening centres.

Mr Clare said federal, state and territory governments must bring in a national register of childcare workers, and “fix’’ working-with-children checks to provide live notifications of criminal convictions. “That’s work that’s being led by attorneys-general, but it needs to be sped up,’’ he told the Seven Network.

“It’s a complicated system but people aren’t interested in bloody excuses, they’re interested in action. The implementation of those reforms has taken too bloody long, and they need to be accelerated.’’

Mr Clare hosed down suggestions that men be banned from working in childcare, noting that women had also abused and ­neglected children in daycare.

Australia’s largest childcare chain, not-for-profit Goodstart Early Learning, has revealed it is installing CCTV cameras across all 653 centres to “enhance safety and security, with strict privacy controls in place’’.

“CCTV has a role to play but it will never be a replacement for ­active supervision of every child by professional educators,’’ Goodstart said in a statement.

“Governments will have to consider how they fund a national program to support the rollout of CCTV in early learning centres as the costs are extremely high, in terms of installation costs, secure storage of data and ongoing monitoring or review.’’

Goodstart banned mobile phones from its centres in March this year, well ahead of national ban to start in September.

The company also employs more staff than the mandated ratio of one carer for every four ­babies in nursery rooms. “Our educators are also expected to work closely together to ensure they are in line of sight or in hearing of each other,’’ Goodstart said.

It said staff were not allowed to be alone with a child “if there is no professional reason for doing so’’, and they should avoid taking children to offices or staffrooms out of the sight of colleagues.

Staff do not put posters over windows that hinder line of sight.

Goodstart said: “We are very supportive of the proposed introduction of a national working-with-children check, improved reporting and information sharing between government agencies and increased funding for ­regulators.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109255

File: 15faad9a775df9e⋯.jpg (349.98 KB,960x1280,3:4,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 3520afdf15d1a57⋯.jpg (198.53 KB,1759x2345,1759:2345,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23279069 (050810ZJUL25) Notable: Queensland review into responses to child sexual abuse hears past complaints against Ashley Paul Griffith may not have been shared between agencies – A review into system responses to child sexual abuse has heard that reputation concerns, defamation fears, and unclear processes may have deterred agencies from raising concerns about convicted paedophile Ashley Paul Griffith, who abused children over two decades. The Child Death Review Board found “more than one complaint” was made to employers, regulators and police, but not always progressed or shared. Griffith retained a Blue Card until his 2022 arrest. The review warned the system gave a “false sense of security” and urged reforms before 2026.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109236

Queensland review into responses to child sexual abuse hears past complaints against Ashley Paul Griffith may not have been shared between agencies

Kate McKenna - 1 Jul 2025

1/2

Defamation fears and a focus on an organisation's "reputation" may act as a deterrent to raising concerns about childcare staff, a Queensland review into child sexual abuse responses has heard.

Paedophile Ashley Paul Griffith is appealing his life sentence after last year pleading guilty to abusing dozens of children over almost 20 years at childcare centres in Brisbane and in Italy.

The Child Death Review Board (CDRB) is currently reviewing system responses to child sexual abuse in Queensland — using Griffith's offending as a case study.

The latest progress report, published late last week, detailed what the review has heard so far, including that the early childhood education and care workforce is large and highly casualised, and pressures may impact the quality of recruitment processes, including the "robustness" of referee checks.

"[In addition] the prioritisation of an organisation's reputation, a fear of defamation and legal risks to organisations and individuals may act as a deterrent to raising or sharing concerns about a person, particularly where complaints have not been substantiated," the progress report said.

"Unclear information sharing processes and a fear of privacy breaches may also create an environment where early indicators of potential harm are minimised. This impacts the system's capacity to detect child sexual abuse, including by identifying patterns over time and across services."

Initial findings show 'more than one complaint' made against Griffith

Queensland police have previously said Griffith was subject to two reports about his behaviour in the two years leading up to his arrest, however there was "insufficient evidence to take action" at the time.

An internal inquiry found police investigated the claims appropriately.

The progress report said initial findings from the CDRB review show “more than one complaint” was made about Griffith to his employers, the Early Childhood Regulatory Authority and QPS.

"Of these complaints, the available information suggests they were not always progressed, and information was not shared between agencies," the report said.

"Prior complaints made to QPS did not proceed to prosecution. This meant that up until the offender's arrest in 2022, there were no pending investigations, charges or convictions against him, and he met all requirements to obtain and maintain a Blue Card."

Queensland's working with children check — the Blue Card screening process — looks for a charge or conviction for any offence in Australia, child protection prohibition orders, and domestic violence information.

The CDRB review has heard a "lack of understanding" of the limitations of the Blue Card system "may result in a false sense of security" in organisations where workers hold the card.

"The Blue Card system is not designed to collect information on early indicators of harm or to identify patterns over time and across organisations, particularly where complaints about a person have been investigated and found to be unsubstantiated due to a lack of evidence," the progress report said.

"The implementation of a reportable conduct scheme in Queensland, which will commence in 2026, will improve the collation and sharing of this type of information."

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109256

File: fec3ed7b821265d⋯.jpg (309.26 KB,2047x1152,2047:1152,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 1f767263fd1bc5b⋯.jpg (1.65 MB,3853x2167,3853:2167,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23279531 (051335ZJUL25) Notable: University of Pennsylvania to revoke transgender swimmer’s records and apologise to female swimmers – The University of Pennsylvania will revoke Lia Thomas’s swimming records and titles and issue apology letters to female athletes, under a resolution with the US Education Department. The deal comes after the Trump administration froze $US175m in Penn research funds while investigating whether allowing Thomas, a transgender woman, to compete in female categories breached Title IX, the federal law banning sex-based discrimination in education. Education Secretary Linda McMahon called it “the Trump effect in action.” Penn said it complied with NCAA rules at the time. NCAA now restricts women’s teams to those assigned female at birth.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>73621 (pb)

University of Pennsylvania to revoke transgender swimmer’s records and apologise to female swimmers

SARA RANDAZZO - July 02, 2025

The University of Pennsylvania will revoke winning records of a transgender swimmer who competed for the school several years ago and issue apologies to affected female swimmers under a resolution announced Tuesday by the Education Department.

The resolution is the latest in the Trump administration’s ongoing campaign to remake higher education. President Trump’s ire against universities has so far focused on accusations of tolerating antisemitism and criticisms of policies related to diversity, equity and inclusion. Education Secretary Linda McMahon called Tuesday’s agreement (local time) an example of “the Trump effect in action.”

The administration had frozen $US175m ($266m) in federal research funds to the Ivy League university earlier this year while investigating whether Penn violated Title IX by allowing swimmer Lia Thomas to compete on the women’s team. While the resolution doesn’t mention any financial aspects, an Education Department spokeswoman said Tuesday the funds would be restored.

Thomas came out as transgender in the summer of 2019 after previously swimming on the men’s team and underwent hormone therapy during a cancelled Covid pandemic season. Thomas became the first openly transgender athlete to win an NCAA Division I championship after winning the 500-yard (457m) freestyle in 2022. Thomas holds three all-time school records in freestyle events and one relay record.

Penn agreed to remove any records, titles or recognitions “misappropriated by male athletes allowed to compete in female categories,” the Education Department said. The resolution also includes sending personalised apology letters to affected female swimmers, adopting “biology-based definitions” for the words “male” and “female” and issuing public statements.

Thomas is the only transgender athlete to have participated in women’s competitive athletics at Penn.

The university noted Tuesday that it complied with NCAA rules at the time Thomas competed and never set its own regulations around transgender athletes. NCAA in February announced new guidelines, following an executive order by Trump, that limit women’s athletic teams to those assigned female at birth.

“Our commitment to ensuring a respectful and welcoming environment for all of our students is unwavering,” Penn President J Larry Jameson said Tuesday. “At the same time, we must comply with federal requirements.”

In February, three former Penn swimmers sued the school and the organisers of an Ivy League championship for allowing Thomas to compete, arguing it made the competition unfair.

Paula Scanlan, a former Penn swimmer not involved in the lawsuit, heralded the agreement in the Education Department announcement. “Today marks a momentous step in repairing the past mistreatment of female athletes, and forging a future where sex discrimination plays no role in limiting girls’ potential,” Scanlan said.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/world/us-politics/penn-to-revoke-transgender-swimmers-records-and-apologise-to-female-swimmers/news-story/8b4271d7a62bf2f1f6890c34f235be75

https://qresear.ch/?q=Lia+Thomas

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109257

File: 7ba6f8c8fcfae94⋯.jpg (78.26 KB,1280x720,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 0e396ca7e68a913⋯.jpg (295.13 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23279579 (051347ZJUL25) Notable: PNG woman Rosa Yakapus endured days of public torture. No one came to save her – Rosa Yakapus, in PNG’s Hela Province, was accused of sorcery in her estranged husband’s death and endured three days of brutal, public torture. Stripped naked, tied to a pole, and burned, she was assaulted with hot sticks and knives before being shot and thrown into a river. Villagers repeatedly called police, but officers lacked vehicles, fuel, and backup to intervene. Critics argue billions in Australian aid secure energy projects while women remain unprotected. Shared videos underline escalating sorcery-accusation violence and community paralysis. “The world is watching PNG. We need to do something,” said Sergeant Alice Arigo, urging cars, fuel, rations, and urgent arrests soon.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>73607 (pb)

PNG woman Rosa Yakapus endured days of public torture. No one came to save her

AMANDA HODGE - 5 July 2025

1/2

On Tuesday this week, Papua New Guineans received a government phone alert that a new Australian-trained, counterterrorist unit – the latest beneficiary of hundreds of millions in funding – was being deployed with “shoot to kill” orders to address soaring tribal violence.

A day earlier, in Ugu village in PNG’s impoverished Hela Province, Rosa Yakapus, stripped naked and tied to a pole with her legs spread wide and a fire burning beneath her, was enduring a third day of extreme and very public torture over a sorcery allegation.

Her estranged husband, a man she had supported through teacher’s college only for him to marry another woman after his career took flight, had died of a suspected heart attack and his relatives had accused her of using witchcraft to kill him.

Graphic videos of Rosa’s ordeal circulating before her death and in the days since, including her assault with hot sticks and knives, have raised questions about the police response to such an extreme and public crime.

The Weekend Australian has been told a local community police officer at a Margarima police station, less then 40 minutes drive away from Ugu village, had fielded calls from several villagers alerting them to the ongoing torture. They hoped police could come and save her.

But no one rescued Rosa Yakapus.

The Margarima local community police officer was on his own with no car.

He called Sergeant Alice Arigo, the committed, lone family and gender violence officer in a region now riven with such crimes, who this week has been personally caring for two sorcery-related violence victims for lack of a local safe house.

She too had no car – after it was “requisitioned” by another station – and needed backup which took time to organise, time that Rosa Yakapus did not have.

Hela Province police commander Michael Heli, a two-hour drive away, was only 10 days into the job and still finding his feet when he too learned of Rosa’s ordeal. He ordered a car to be sent to Margarima but by the time it happened it was too late.

In a province where huge police and military resources are dedicated to protecting Chevron and Santos oil and LNG projects, there were apparently no resources available for a woman whose impending murder had been all-but broadcast through viral video.

Australia has sunk well over a billion dollars into building up PNG’s defence and police forces in the past decade, $637 million this year alone in development assistance, and another $600 million to support a Port Moresby-based National Rugby League team – all in the interests of geostrategic security.

Yet there were no vehicles, no fuel, no manpower to save Rosa, none either for at least two other women in her district killed weeks earlier in horrifically similar circumstances, nor for countless PNG women every year who face beatings, torture and sorcery-accusation related mob killings.

Australian money, it seems, has done little to improve their security.

In Rosa’s final hours another video shows her still naked, signs of torture on her body.

It is dark and she is blindfolded. Her head is hanging down and she is surrounded by a mob of men, some laughing, many taking video.

“Did you remove his heart?” one village leader is heard to ask.

In earlier videos she has protested her innocence but this time she weakly confesses.

She did take his heart, she says, but she can put it back and revive him if only they will allow her to go free.

It is a feeble and ultimately futile last effort to save her own life.

On Tuesday evening, after 72 hours of enduring the most extreme, humiliating and sexual-related violence – much of it reportedly committed in front of her five children – her death is recorded in one final video.

Rosa cowers weakly at the very edge of a bridge while a village mob looks on. A single gunshot rings out and her body falls into the river below.

“It took three days and nobody tried to stop it,” says Hela province Bishop Reverend Steven Bai who has called for all those responsible to surrender. “Even the police didn’t come on time. The problem was manpower and logistics.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109258

File: 3f865ff65be7e22⋯.jpg (126.71 KB,1279x720,1279:720,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23279623 (051356ZJUL25) Notable: Opinion: Torture, burning, murder: just the tip of the iceberg in PNG - “The case of a young woman tortured in front of a group of men before being murdered in Papua New Guinea, which Amanda Hodge describes in her article, is significant not because it’s unusual but because it is all too common. Many, many more cases go unrecorded in any way. Bodies are silently buried, or disposed of in rivers, or thrown down pit toilets. Survivors flee their communities and become refugees, constantly looking over their shoulder, worried about what will happen when their new neighbours learn about their history. Most government officials in PNG now accept that this happens on a regular basis and at scale. I have been working in the space of what is now called sorcery accusation related violence in Papua New Guinea since 2013. This has been difficult work, but we have started to see some positive developments. Most government officials in PNG now accept that this happens on a regular basis and at scale. PNG has also passed a holistic national action plan to address sorcery accusation related violence, ... And yet, the violence and the cases continue. The national action plan has been desperately underfunded. The response is overwhelmingly reactive rather than preventive.” - Miranda Forsyth, Director of the International Network Against Witchcraft Accusations and Ritual Attacks - The Australian.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>73607 (pb)

>>109257

Torture, burning, murder: just the tip of the iceberg in PNG

MIRANDA FORSYTH - 5 July 2025

In my work as Director of the International Network Against Witchcraft Accusations and Ritual Attacks I am regularly sent images of the most shocking and gruesome violence to women, related to witchcraft accusations.

The case of a young woman tortured in front of a group of men before being murdered in Papua New Guinea, which Amanda Hodge describes in her article, is significant not because it’s unusual but because it is all too common.

I am told about such cases on a depressingly regular basis, sometimes with, and sometimes without, video footage or photographs. Most cases involve an element of public torture and collective violence. Most are triggered by a death or sickness.

But frequent as these cases are, they are just the tip of the iceberg. Many, many more cases go unrecorded in any way. Bodies are silently buried, or disposed of in rivers, or thrown down pit toilets. Survivors flee their communities and become refugees, constantly looking over their shoulder, worried about what will happen when their new neighbours learn about their history. The fact that an entire community often supports these kinds of attacks and the consequent fear of repercussions, means that cases are seldom reported to police, and even more infrequently result in a prosecution.

I have been working in the space of what is now called sorcery accusation related violence in Papua New Guinea since 2013. Over this time, I have sought to reveal and map the extreme human rights abuses associated with accusations of sorcery.

In one detailed mapping exercise, I recorded 1039 accusation incidents involving 1553 accused persons in four out of the 23 provinces (less than 2 million people) in PNG, over a four-year period. In total, 318 people, either died or survived serious harm during this period, just over half of whom were women.

This has been difficult work, but we have started to see some positive developments. Most government officials in PNG now accept that this happens on a regular basis and at scale.

PNG has also passed a holistic national action plan to address sorcery accusation related violence, and there are many activists and donor programs working in the area. Many use WhatsApp or other social media to network with local leaders and sympathetic police officers and each other.

And yet, the violence and the cases continue. Many police officers are apathetic, overwhelmed or on the side of the community. The national action plan has been desperately underfunded. The response is overwhelmingly reactive rather than preventive.

Through my work on sorcery accusation related violence in PNG I came to know about individuals and organisations around the world working on similar problems.

In 2021 the UN Human Rights Council passed the Resolution on the Elimination of Harmful practices related to Accusations of Witchcraft and Ritual Attacks which documented more than 20,000 cases of harmful practices related to witchcraft accusations in more than 60 countries over a 10 year period, between 2009 and 2019.

The resolution formally recognised at an international level the scale of the problem for the first time and highlighted the urgent need for governments across the world to take action.

But it is just the start of the journey, rather than the end.

Miranda Forsyth is the Director of the International Network Against Witchcraft Accusations and Ritual Attacks.

This article is an edited version of a speech she gave at the exhibition ‘Witch Hunts in the 21st Century: A Human Rights Catastrophe’, which can be seen at the Moot Court Foyer, ANU Law School until Tuesday July 8.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/world/torture-burning-murder-just-the-tip-of-the-iceberg-in-png/news-story/7216208714ded4b496b23306820c5f3f

https://www.anu.edu.au/events/witch-hunts-in-the-21st-century-a-human-rights-catastrophe-photography-exhibition-launch

https://researchportalplus.anu.edu.au/en/persons/miranda-forsyth

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109259

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23283156 (060823ZJUL25) Notable: Video: Anthony Albanese to champion 'Australian independence' within US alliance – Prime Minister Anthony Albanese will deliver a speech honouring John Curtin, invoking his wartime leadership to argue Australia must assert sovereignty within its US alliance. He will stress Curtin is remembered for “speaking for Australia” and resisting US-UK pressure to divert troops to Burma. The speech comes amid Trump’s tariffs, AUKUS uncertainty and defence spending demands. Historian James Curran called it Albanese’s most significant speech, saying it highlights that “being in a close alliance does not mean you cannot stand up for Australian self-respect and self-regard,” a signal to both Washington and Australians.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>73662 (pb)

>>109234

Anthony Albanese to champion 'Australian independence' within US alliance

Stephen Dziedzic - 4 Jul 2025

Anthony Albanese will use a speech lionising Labor prime minister John Curtin to champion Australian independence within the US alliance, saying the legendary wartime leader is remembered "not just because he looked to America" but because he "spoke for Australia".

The speech comes at a delicate moment in Australia's key strategic relationship. The federal government is grappling with an unpredictable White House, along with uncertainties over the administration's tariffs, the AUKUS pact, and the US's trajectory under President Donald Trump.

On Saturday night the prime minister will deliver a speech at the John Curtin Research Centre marking the 80th anniversary of the former prime minister, who is often called the "father" of the Australia-US alliance.

Successive Labor prime ministers have claimed the alliance as a signature achievement for ALP foreign policy, and have lavished praise on Curtin for turning to America in the wake of the United Kingdom's catastrophic defeat in Singapore in 1942.

While Mr Albanese will praise the alliance as a "pillar" of Australian foreign policy and the nation's "most important defence and security partnership" he will also say that it was "product" of Curtin's leadership and "not the extent of it".

"Curtin's famous statement that Australia 'looked to America' was much more than the idea of trading one strategic guarantor for another, or swapping an alliance with the old world for one with the new," he is expected to say.

"It was a recognition that Australia's fate would be decided in our region."

The prime minister will also say that Curtin recognised that Australia realised that its security "could not be outsourced to London, or trusted to vague assurances from Britain".

"We needed an Australian foreign policy anchored in strategic reality, not bound by tradition," he will say.

"So we remember Curtin not just because he looked to America. We honour him because he spoke for Australia."

Mr Albanese will also praise Curtin for withstanding pressure from both Roosevelt and Churchill to send Australian troops returning from the Middle East to Burma, rather than back home to defend Australia.

He will say that if the US and UK got their way, "hundreds if not thousands of Australians would have been killed, or taken prisoner" as Japanese forces took Burma, and John Curtin's assertion of sovereignty prevented "a disaster every bit as crushing to national morale as the fall of Singapore".

The prime minister will also seek to frame his government as the inheritor of Curtin's economic agenda, comparing the government's moves to bolster manufacturing to Curtin's wartime industrial program.

While the Albanese government has doubled down on the AUKUS pact and its ambitious plan to develop nuclear powered submarines with the United States, it has also expressed deep frustration over the Trump administration's so-called Liberation Day tariffs, pushed back against Washington's demand that Australia radically increase defence spending, and fretted privately about the impact of the massive cuts to US aid programs.

And while Mr Albanese has had three phone calls with Mr Trump, he is yet to have a face-to-face meeting with the president since the US leader departed the G7 in Canada early ahead of American strikes on Iran.

'Easily the most significant' speech

James Curran from the University of Sydney told the ABC the speech was "easily the most significant" one Mr Albanese had delivered in office.

"It's significant not just for the way in which Albanese invokes the Curtin legend, but the time in which he is doing it — when Australia is again under significant pressure from a great power to adopt policy courses not necessarily in Australia's interests," he said.

"He says Curtin's wartime leadership was fundamentally about the defence of Australian sovereignty, that it was about safeguarding Australia's security in the Pacific, and that Curtin, like other Australia leaders before him, was all too aware that great powers can play fast and loose with Australian interests. That it was simply not an option to rely on assurances from London or Washington as the basis for making Australian policy."

Professor Curran said Mr Albanese was using the Curtin story to send a signal to both Washington and to Australians that "being in a close alliance does not mean you cannot stand up for Australian self-respect and self-regard".

"[Also] that leadership is as much about tending to the domestic hearth and what we have built here as it is in safeguarding the continent's security," he said.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-07-04/anthony-albanese-champions-australian-independence-/105497350

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n3ZBRY_IA4s

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109260

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23283166 (060832ZJUL25) Notable: Video: Why Albanese’s ‘Australian way’ speech will concern Washington – Prime Minister Anthony Albanese used the John Curtin Oration to outline an “Australian way” foreign policy, stressing Canberra will pursue sovereign interests even when diverging from Washington. He drew on Curtin’s defiance of Churchill and Roosevelt in WWII, framing the US alliance as “a pillar” but “not the extent” of policy, while promoting regional engagement, multilateralism and the rules-based order. Critics in Washington viewed the speech negatively, with Hudson Institute’s John Lee warning it lacked matching defence spending and risked leaving Australia “more isolated and vulnerable,” while Arthur Sinodinos urged careful diplomacy to prevent misinterpretation.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109259

Why Albanese’s ‘Australian way’ speech will concern Washington

JOE KELLY - 6 July 2025

1/2

Anthony Albanese has given a speech that will heighten fears of a growing strategic and political disconnect between Australia and Washington.

The Prime Minister used the John Curtin Oration in Sydney on Saturday night to set out what he has dubbed the “Australian way” under Labor.

This is partly a response to the “America First” agenda being championed by Donald Trump, with Albanese issuing a reminder that Labor will pursue Australian sovereign interests – even where they diverge from those of Washington.

Drawing on Curtin’s wartime experience in resisting pressure from Winston Churchill and Franklin D. Roosevelt to divert Australian troops to Burma following the fall of Singapore, Albanese made clear the US alliance was “not the extent” of Australia’s defence and foreign policy.

“Our alliance with the US ought to be remembered as a product of Curtin’s leadership in defence and foreign policy, not the extent of it,” he said. “Curtin’s famous statement that Australia ‘looked to America’ was much more than the idea of trading one strategic guarantor for another … It was a recognition that Australia’s fate would be decided in our region.”

This will be seen as a rhetorical assertion of greater Australian independence on the world stage at a time of growing differences and strain in Canberra’s relations with Washington under Trump.

The address will have been closely watched in Washington, with insiders already suggesting it is being viewed negatively. They say Albanese is not taking the obvious step to embrace greater independence by lifting defence spending above current levels.

Setting out the pillars of his “Australian way”, Albanese made clear this approach included strong support for a robust multilateralism, adherence to the rules-based order, support for small and middle powers and a rejection of “great power peace” as the basis for stability in the Indo-Pacific.

While this sends a message to Beijing, it will also reverberate discordantly in Washington. The risk is Albanese will be seen as leaning into the differences between Labor and the Trump administration to win a domestic political dividend.

These differences extend beyond the realm of foreign affairs, with Albanese framing Australia as a “social laboratory” and ‘workers’ paradise” in having created a fair minimum wage, age pension and affordable health care.

After the US pharmaceutical lobby took aim at Australia’s Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme, Albanese sent another message to Washington. “We’ve made it clear that under our Labor government, the PBS is not up for negotiation,” he said.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109261

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23283172 (060837ZJUL25) Notable: Video: Anthony Albanese pays tribute to ‘father’ of Australia-US alliance – Prime Minister Anthony Albanese delivered the John Curtin Oration in Sydney, marking 80 years since Curtin’s death, to praise the wartime leader as founder of the Australia-US alliance while highlighting Australia’s sovereign independence. He said Curtin’s defiance of Churchill and Roosevelt, who wanted troops sent to Burma, saved “hundreds if not thousands” of lives and showed Australia’s fate must be decided in its own region. Albanese called the alliance a “pillar” but “not the extent” of policy, stressing middle-power rights, Pacific leadership, and stabilising ties with China, amid Trump’s push for 3.5% GDP defence spending.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109259

>>109260

Anthony Albanese pays tribute to ‘father’ of Australia-US alliance

LYDIA LYNCH - 5 July 2025

Anthony Albanese has trumpeted Australia’s independence in its relationship with the United States in a speech paying tribute to the wartime leadership of John Curtin.

Amid growing concern about his relationship with Donald Trump, the looming tariff deadline and doubts about the future of the AUKUS submarine deal, Mr Albanese praised Curtin for giving Australia “the confidence and determination to think and act for ourselves”.

In his speech in Sydney on Saturday night, to mark 80 years since the death of the former Labor prime minister, Mr Albanese honoured Curtin as the founder of the Australia-US alliance.

“A pillar of our foreign policy. Our most important defence and security partnership and a relationship that commands bipartisan support, respect and affection in both our nations,” he said.

“Yet our alliance with the US ought to be remembered as a product of Curtin’s leadership in defence and foreign policy, not the extent of it.”

As WWII spread into the Pacific, Curtin recognised that Australia’s security could not be “outsourced to London” and foreign policy had to be “anchored in strategic reality, not bound by tradition”.

Mr Albanese praised Curtin’s decision to push back on Winston Churchill and Franklin Roosevelt’s demands to deploy troops to Burma, now Myanmar, which would have resulted in the death or capture of “hundreds if not thousands of Australians”.

“Curtin’s famous statement that Australia ‘looked to America’ was much more than the idea of trading one strategic guarantor for another, or swapping an alliance with the old world for one with the new.

“It was a recognition that Australia’s fate would be decided in our region. It followed the decision Curtin had made in 1941 that Australia would issue its own declaration of war with Japan.

“Speaking for ourselves, as a sovereign nation.”

Ahead of an extended trip to China this month where he will have his fourth meeting with President Xi Jinping, Mr Albanese also championed “the rights and the role of middle powers and smaller nations”.

He said Labor was rebuilding Australia’s standing as a leader in the Pacific and “patiently and deliberately working to stabilise our relationship with China”.

The Prime Minister’s speech comes amid growing calls for him to do more to strengthen his relationship with the Trump administration, which is demanding Australia lift defence spending to 3.5 per cent of GDP.

Mr Albanese has had three phone calls with Mr Trump, but the pair have never met in person, with the President cancelling their talks at the G7 summit in Canada last month to deal with the Israel-Iran conflict.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/anthony-albanese-pays-tribute-to-father-of-australiaus-alliance/news-story/f8d00102f3ddf391184d5bf217f78bc2

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=angnhO-jOSI

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109262

File: 7d37f2146f20651⋯.jpg (251.56 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: f080ad3f25a7842⋯.jpg (241.79 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 0ed352b2ecaaae6⋯.jpg (681.4 KB,2048x2730,1024:1365,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23283192 (060900ZJUL25) Notable: Albanese urged to reassure Trump after Curtin speech – Anthony Albanese’s John Curtin Research Centre address, praising independence in foreign policy, has sparked warnings it could be misread in Washington while AUKUS is under review. Former ambassador Arthur Sinodinos urged a diplomatic “charm offensive” to reassure the Trump administration the alliance remains strong, while Opposition Leader Sussan Ley said the speech’s timing risked weakening ties. Ex-Home Affairs chief Mike Pezzullo argued Albanese overlooked Curtin’s pre-war push for defence preparedness and self-reliance, while analyst Michael Shoebridge criticised the speech as ill-timed before Albanese’s fourth meeting with Xi Jinping, noting Albanese has yet to meet Trump face-to-face.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>73662 (pb)

>>109259

>>109260

Albanese urged to reassure Trump after Curtin speech

GREG BROWN and JOE KELLY - 6 July 2025

1/2

Former ambassador to the US Arthur Sinodinos has urged the Albanese government to assure the Trump administration it is not going its own way on foreign policy, amid concerns a weekend speech by Anthony Albanese will be viewed negatively in Washington as AUKUS is being reviewed.

Mr Sinodinos called for a diplomatic charm offensive after the Prime Minister hailed John Curtin for pursuing an independent foreign policy that was “not bound by tradition”.

Mr Albanese’s speech, at the John Curtin Research Centre on Saturday, identified the former prime minister’s role in establishing Australia’s alliance with the US during World War II.

While he called the alliance a “pillar of our foreign policy” and “our most important defence and security partnership”, Mr Albanese also declared it was “not the extent” of Curtin’s foreign policy agenda.

“Because Curtin’s famous statement that Australia ‘looked to America’ was much more than the idea of trading one strategic guarantor for another. Or swapping an alliance with the old world for one with the new,” Mr Albanese said in the speech.

“It was a recognition that Australia’s fate would be decided in our region.”

Mr Albanese will travel to China at the end of the week and is expected to have his fourth meeting with Xi Jinping before securing one with Donald Trump.

While Mr Sinodinos defended the content of the speech, he said the context of the relationship with the Trump administration – including the review of AUKUS and a failure to secure a leader-to-leader meeting – made a “careful explanation” necessary.

“Given the context of Australia-US relations at present, the speech will need careful explanation to our American friends to avoid a misconception that was hyped that the speech would be a declaration of independence from the US,” Mr Sinodinos said.

“The speech is about Australia taking foreign policy decisions in its own interest including turning to the US in World War II, and frames that pivot in terms of our security interest in the region.

“The speech makes clear that the alliance has bipartisan support in Australia.”

Sussan Ley questioned the timing of Mr Albanese’s speech on Saturday night, arguing the relationship with Washington “remains as much in our national interest today as it did during John Curtin’s prime ministership”.

“Many Australians will wonder whether this speech at this time was in our national interest, given so many things crucial to Australia’s future are currently being considered by the US administration,” the Opposition Leader said.

“At a time of global uncertainty, growing conflict and a growing list of issues in the Australia-United States relationship, now is a time to build our influence in Washington, not diminish it.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109263

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23283256 (060956ZJUL25) Notable: Video: Man charged after alleged arson attack on Melbourne synagogue – Angelo Loras, 34, from NSW, has been charged with reckless conduct endangering life, criminal damage by fire and weapon possession after the East Melbourne Hebrew Congregation’s doors were allegedly set alight, forcing 20 people to flee. Police are probing intent and ideology to determine terrorism links. On the same night, protesters chanting “death to the IDF” attacked Israeli restaurant Miznon, cars were torched in Greensborough, and antisemitic graffiti appeared in Elsternwick. Anthony Albanese condemned the synagogue arson as “cowardly.” Benjamin Netanyahu called the incidents “reprehensible anti-Semitic attacks” and urged Australia to “take all action” against those responsible.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109251

>>109252

>>109253

Man charged after alleged arson attack on Melbourne synagogue

Allanah Sciberras and Callum Godde - 6 July 2025

1/2

The identity of a man accused of firebombing a synagogue has been revealed, as a series of alleged anti-Semitic attacks at several other locations draws international attention.

Angelo Loras, 34, from Toongabbie in NSW, was arrested in Melbourne's CBD on Saturday night, about 24 hours after the front doors of the East Melbourne Hebrew Congregation were allegedly set alight, forcing 20 people to flee.

He has been charged multiple offences including reckless conduct endangering life, criminal damage by fire and possession of a controlled weapon.

The 34-year-old appeared in Melbourne Magistrates' Court on Sunday, where the court was told it was his first time in custody.

He was remanded until a hearing on July 22.

Detectives will investigate the accused man's intent and ideology to determine if the incident was an act of terrorism.

Police are also investigating another alleged act of anti-Semitism on the same night, when protesters who splintered from a larger demonstration allegedly smashed a window, flipped tables, threw chairs and chanted "death to the IDF" outside Israeli restaurant Miznon.

Hours later, offenders spray-painted three cars and a wall outside a Greensborough business in Melbourne's northeast before setting fire to the vehicles, destroying one and damaging two.

Police have revealed they are investigating a fourth incident where offenders used stencils to spray paint offensive images on pillars at a busy intersection and a number of walls in Elsternwick.

It came as hundreds gathered for a pro-Palestine rally in Melbourne on Sunday.

Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu has condemned "reprehensible anti-Semitic attacks" on both the Melbourne synagogue and restaurant.

He urged the federal government to "take all action" against those responsible.

None of the incidents have been declared terrorism-related but the force is increasing patrols around the synagogue and in the city's southeast.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109264

File: ad620590100c083⋯.jpg (321.08 KB,1280x853,1280:853,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 42db792dc7e6e8f⋯.jpg (356.43 KB,1280x853,1280:853,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 1187d281b5b6699⋯.jpg (245.08 KB,1280x853,1280:853,Clipboard.jpg)

File: be32fff7b97d7f3⋯.jpg (467.44 KB,1280x853,1280:853,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 06d801cc857deb8⋯.jpg (211.47 KB,1280x853,1280:853,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23283300 (061014ZJUL25) Notable: Protesters continue anti-IDF chant at Melbourne rally following antisemitic attacks – At a Melbourne rally on Sunday, children led chants of “Death to the IDF” just 48 hours after an arson attack on East Melbourne Synagogue forced 20 worshippers to flee. Organisers condemned the synagogue attack, but police continue to probe links between Miznon restaurant agitators and known violent protest groups. Angelo Loras, 34, was charged with the synagogue arson and remanded until July 22. State Opposition Leader Brad Battin demanded stronger police powers, while Jewish MP David Southwick accused Premier Jacinta Allan’s government of delaying promised protections, leaving Victoria’s Jewish community “under siege.”

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109251

>>109252

>>109263

Protesters continue anti-IDF chant at Melbourne rally following antisemitic attacks

Kieran Rooney - July 6, 2025

1/2

Pro-Palestinian advocates including children chanted “Death to the IDF” at a demonstration in Melbourne less than 48 hours after an antisemitic attack on a Melbourne synagogue.

The chants came after a number of leaders of the pro-Palestinian protest condemned the attempted firebombing of an East Melbourne synagogue on Friday while children and families were inside.

Despite a rally organiser’s condemnation of the attack during the protest, two pre-teen Melbourne sisters, who had previously made moving remarks about the suffering of children their age in Gaza, then led chants of “Death, death to the IDF [Israel Defence Forces]” and “Death, death to the IOF [Israeli Occupying Force]“.

On the same night as Friday’s synagogue attack, a group of 20 people stormed Israeli restaurant Miznon in the CBD, upturning tables, distressing diners and chanting “Death to the IDF”.

Police are also investigating a third incident, on Saturday morning, in which three cars were set on fire and the wall of a business in Melbourne’s north-east was spray-painted with graffiti.

The protest and the chants came after political leaders hit out at the protests which came two days after Friday night’s incidents.

On Sunday, counterterrorism detectives charged Sydney man Angelo Loras over the alleged arson attack at the synagogue, while police continue to investigate the incident at Miznon. The 34-year-old appeared in Melbourne Magistrates’ Court on Sunday and was remanded until July 22. The court heard it was the accused’s first time custody.

Police said they were still trying to determine whether to classify the alleged arson as an act of terror. They continue to investigate the instigators of the antisemitic incident at Miznon on Friday night.

A police source, who cannot be identified speaking about operational matters, said at least one of those who invaded the restaurant was part of a group known to counter-terrorism police for sometimes organising left-wing protests that turned violent.

Victoria Police declined to comment on the identity of the person or the nature of the groups involved.

At the protest on Sunday, an organiser who did not wish to be identified opened the event by condemning the attack on the synagogue where 20 worshippers were gathered for a meal on the weekly Jewish holy day of Shabbat, on Friday night.

She later told this masthead: “We’ve always stood against antisemitism; attacks on synagogues, worshipping and praying. That’s not what we stand for, and we condemn the attacks.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109265

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23283343 (061041ZJUL25) Notable: Video: Reviving the Warrior Spirit: Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth on Service, Sacrifice & Strength - “This We Will Defend.” Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth delivers a powerful message on service, sacrifice, and the revival of the American warrior spirit under President Trump. - The White House

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>73555 (pb)

>>73582 (pb)

>>109229

Reviving the Warrior Spirit: Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth on Service, Sacrifice & Strength

The White House

Jul 6, 2025

“This We Will Defend.”

Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth delivers a powerful message on service, sacrifice, and the revival of the American warrior spirit under President Trump.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=38hwtrnR66k

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109266

File: 54db23e3d826429⋯.jpg (590.98 KB,2473x1649,2473:1649,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 23e9880241b8f0e⋯.jpg (268.84 KB,1963x1469,151:113,Clipboard.jpg)

File: ee6c0492ad2e53f⋯.jpg (1 MB,4507x3005,4507:3005,Clipboard.jpg)

File: b151a69ca94d731⋯.jpg (560.27 KB,3000x2000,3:2,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23288285 (070927ZJUL25) Notable: The Australia-first words that Sussan Ley says could diminish US relationship – Anthony Albanese used the John Curtin Research Centre oration to highlight Australia’s foreign policy independence, praising Curtin’s decision to prioritise national defence over US and UK demands during WWII. Albanese framed the alliance as “a product of Curtin’s leadership, not the extent of it,” under the banner of “progressive patriotism.” Opposition Leader Sussan Ley sharply criticised the timing, warning that with the Trump administration reviewing AUKUS and tariffs, Australia should “build our influence in Washington, not diminish it.” Ley argued many Australians would question whether such a speech was in the national interest given critical US decisions looming.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109259

>>109260

The Australia-first words that Sussan Ley says could diminish US relationship

Paul Sakkal - July 6, 2025

Opposition Leader Sussan Ley has questioned the wisdom of Prime Minister Anthony Albanese’s decision to emphasise Australia’s foreign policy independence while the Trump administration reviews the future of the AUKUS defence pact.

On the eve of his meeting in China with President Xi Jinping next week, Albanese used the 80th anniversary of the death of Labor’s wartime prime minister John Curtin to talk up Curtin’s Australia-first instincts.

“John Curtin is rightly honoured as the founder of Australia’s alliance with the United States. A pillar of our foreign policy … that commands bipartisan support, respect and affection,” Albanese said at the John Curtin Research Centre’s annual oration in Sydney on Saturday.

“Yet our alliance with the US ought to be remembered as a product of Curtin’s leadership in defence and foreign policy, not the extent of it.

“As Paul Keating put it in his John Curtin Memorial Lecture: ‘Curtin began us thinking in our own terms’.

“So we remember Curtin not just because he looked to America. We honour him because he spoke for Australia.”

Curtin is feted for shifting Australia’s primary allegiance from London to Washington, but Albanese hailed Curtin’s decision to stand up to both powers by bringing troops back to defend Australia, rather than sending them to Burma. In putting Australia first, Albanese said Curtin avoided a “disaster”.

Albanese placed his reflections on Curtin under the banner of “progressive patriotism”, a phrase he has used repeatedly since first mentioning it in this masthead’s Inside Politics podcast in May.

But with Albanese now unable to secure a face-to-face meeting with US President Donald Trump, even as the AUKUS defence pact is being reviewed by the Pentagon and Australia is lobbying for exemptions to US tariffs, Sussan Ley argued it was the wrong time to inch away from the US.

“At a time of global uncertainty, growing conflict and a growing list of issues in the Australia-United States relationship, now is a time to build our influence in Washington, not diminish it,” she said in a statement.

“Many Australians will wonder whether this speech at this time was in our national interest, given so many things crucial to Australia’s future are currently being considered by the US administration.”

The AUKUS defence pact is a trilateral agreement with the United States and United Kingdom that will allow Australia to acquire nuclear submarine capabilities.

James Laurenceson, director of the Australia-China Relations Institute at the University of Technology Sydney, said that since John Howard it was unusual for Australian prime ministers to speak positively about a more independent foreign policy not tied solely to US interests.

“It’s not entirely inconsistent with where Albanese has been headed,” Laurenceson said, pointing to remarks from Trade Minister Don Farrell about growing trade with China following Trump’s tariffs.

Laurenceson said Albanese would be confident that the Australian public was comfortable with his coming meeting with Xi occurring before a face-to-face with Trump, pointing to polling showing Trump’s unpopularity in Australia. Coalition trade spokesman Kevin Hogan said on Sky News on Sunday that “it is embarrassing” Albanese had not yet met Trump.

Sydney University international affairs historian James Curran said there was a contradiction in putting a spotlight on sovereignty at a time when Australia was tying itself more firmly into US military framework through the AUKUS submarine pact.

He said Albanese’s speech was significant because it came at a time when the US was pressuring allies to boost defence spending and contain a rising power in China.

“While it’s not a new strategic doctrine, it is saying that there are times when Australia has to determine its own destiny,” Curran said.

“After the best part of two decades, in which the culture of the alliance has been awash in the sentimental claptrap of ‘100 years of mateship’, it’s not necessarily a bad thing for the loose cannons in the Trump administration – who are perhaps getting used to allies capitulating – to hear an Australian PM saying that, from time to time, Australia needs to express itself differently.”

During the election campaign, Albanese and his ministers used Trump’s haphazard approach to discredit the Peter Dutton-led Coalition, whose policy agenda and style had similarities with the US president’s.

https://www.theage.com.au/politics/federal/the-australia-first-words-that-sussan-ley-says-are-a-threat-to-the-us-relationship-20250706-p5mcve.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109267

File: 46a81088ae17af1⋯.jpg (409.74 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 6df05da1fc3b016⋯.jpg (134.33 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23288298 (070941ZJUL25) Notable: Washington will not be impressed by Anthony Albanese’s Curtin call … but Beijing will lap it up“Anthony Albanese’s John Curtin oration was ‘astonishingly ahistorical’ and dangerously misleading. By misrepresenting Curtin’s legacy to suggest a lesson of distance from the US, Albanese risks weakening the alliance while flattering Beijing. Curtin placed Australian troops under US command and sought deeper imperial defence links, yet Albanese cherry-picks one dispute with Churchill as proof of independence. With defence spending stagnant, Albanese’s rhetoric is hollow and irresponsible, and this silly speech will do nothing to convince Washington there is a serious government in Canberra.” – Greg Sheridan, The Australian

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109259

>>109260

Washington will not be impressed by Anthony Albanese’s Curtin call ... but Beijing will lap it up

GREG SHERIDAN - 6 July 2025

1/2

Is Anthony Albanese actually trying, intentionally, for reasons best known to himself, to diminish, if not undermine, the US-Australia alliance?

How else to explain his bizarre “look away from America” speech about John Curtin, and the lesson for contemporary Australia to keep its distance from the US?

What byzantine thought processes in the PM’s office produced this astonishingly ahistorical, if not slightly dotty, speech about Curtin, misinterpreting the wartime leader – who placed all Australian troops under the command of US General Douglas MacArthur, who wanted to make Australia “a second Britannia in the Antipodes”, who in his own words feared “the teeming millions of coloured races” to Australia’s north and who therefore argued for re-establishing imperial defence centred on Britain once the war ended – into a modern identity politics kumbaya Asianist?

Of course, it’s not the misrepresentation of Curtin’s historical record in this speech that is so perplexing. It’s the dangerous rhetorical and political purposes to which Albanese seeks to put this misinterpretation that is worrying. Who on earth is Albanese messaging in this speech? Because it implies greater Australian strategic distance from the US, it will be welcomed in Beijing. But the Prime Minister is surely overdoing things here. There’s already been enough sucking up to Beijing to ensure a favourable reception in his forthcoming extended trip to China.

What does the speech say to Washington? That Australia knows better than the Americans? Surely that’s the implication of the tired, tedious, droolingly unspecific tacit call for greater independence within the alliance. Greater independence and self-reliance would obviously require a vastly increased defence budget. What price logic in this speech?

It’s worth noting that as the PM prepares for his fourth meeting with Xi Jinping but apparently won’t go to Washington to meet Donald Trump, he’s now making strategic speeches more welcome in Beijing than in Washington.

Back to Curtin. In the 1930s, a decade of comprehensive bipartisan defence failure by Australia, which led to the nation being wholly unprepared for World War II, Curtin at least notionally supported defence self-reliance.

Albanese would say he promotes Australian defence self-reliance, too, and also supports the US alliance. But here’s the most basic of the countless contradictions. You cannot do defence self-reliance while failing to produce a formidable Australian Defence Force. And you can’t have a formidable ADF with our current pathetic defence budget.

Defence expenditure was 2 per cent of GDP when Albanese came to office in 2022, it’s 2.05 per cent of GDP now. The dollar increase in the defence budget is a result mainly of inflation and population growth. The real increase in defence spending is minuscule.

The Albanese government has embarked on a program to acquire nuclear submarines, which eats up vast amounts of money without substantially increasing defence spending. As a result, we are weaker militarily now than when Albanese was elected. That’s not independence or self-reliance, it’s national irresponsibility of the kind Curtin fought against. Washington has noticed that Albanese is not remotely funding even the capabilities identified as urgent in his government’s own Defence Strategic Review.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109268

File: 8b63e78345c65ac⋯.jpg (996.93 KB,1920x1440,4:3,Clipboard.jpg)

File: e7cca8b6daf6740⋯.jpg (1.4 MB,4032x3024,4:3,Clipboard.jpg)

File: e3846b9c0a88b0f⋯.jpg (125.39 KB,1920x1080,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23288313 (070952ZJUL25) Notable: Victorian government announces new police taskforce in wake of 'sickening' antisemitic attacks – The Victorian government has launched an Anti-Hate Taskforce after antisemitic attacks across Melbourne, including an arson attack on the East Melbourne Hebrew Congregation that forced 20 worshippers to flee. Premier Jacinta Allan condemned the “sickening crime” and pledged stronger police powers, saying the taskforce would “look at the bigger picture” of hate across Victoria. A 34-year-old Sydney man has been charged. Other incidents included protesters storming Israeli restaurant Miznon, cars torched in Greensborough, and antisemitic graffiti near a Holocaust museum. Anthony Albanese called the attacks “completely unacceptable.”

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109251

>>109252

>>109263

Victorian government announces new police taskforce in wake of 'sickening' antisemitic attacks

abc.net.au - 7 July 2025

The Victorian government has announced a new Anti-Hate Taskforce following a spate of antisemitic attacks in Melbourne over the weekend.

Premier Jacinta Allan said the taskforce would work to crack down on antisemitism after a synagogue in Melbourne's east was set on fire on Friday.

Twenty people were forced to flee the East Melbourne Hebrew Congregation after a man allegedly poured flammable liquid on the front door and set it on fire during a Shabbat meal.

A 34-year-old man from Sydney has been charged over the incident, briefly appearing in Melbourne Magistrates Court on Sunday.

He has been remanded in custody until later this month.

Ms Allan thanked Victoria Police for its swift actions over what she described as a "sickening crime".

"Places of worship like this synagogue are a part of our fabric as a society," she said.

"We will protect them with everything we've got."

Visiting the synagogue in East Melbourne on Monday morning, the premier said she spoke with the Jewish congregation about the "horrific, hateful experience".

"If you consider just as the fire came to the front door here of this shul, but it was stopped - so too must we put a stop to hate, put a stop to antisemitism," she said.

"Which is why alongside pledging my support and my government's support … we spoke about the future. How hate needs to stop, how the Anti-Hate Taskforce will be convened.

"I will continue to stand with the strong, proud Jewish community here in Victoria every single day."

She said a new Anti-Hate Taskforce between governments and police would "look at the bigger picture across our city and state" and vowed to increase police powers to enforce tougher protest laws rolled out earlier this year.

The taskforce is expected to hold its first meeting this week.

Weekend of incidents

Shortly after the attack on the synagogue, about 20 protesters interrupted diners at an Israeli-owned restaurant in the CBD.

In a statement posted to social media, the group behind a No Police at Protests movement said it targeted the restaurant because it was part-owned by Israeli businessman Shahar Segal.

Mr Segal is a spokesman for the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF), an Israeli and US-backed organisation that has been criticised for how it distributes aid in Gaza.

But the group denied that incident was linked to the attack at the synagogue.

"Pro-Palestinian activists have never attacked places of worship, and we condemn such attacks," the statement read.

On Saturday afternoon, police revealed a business in Greensborough was also targeted.

"It's understood that unknown offenders attended a business on Para Road and set fire to three cars," Acting Commander Zorka Dunstan said.

"They also used spray paint on the cars and a building wall. One of the cars was destroyed, the other two were moderately damaged."

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has condemned the weekend incidents.

"It is completely unacceptable the attack that occurred at a restaurant in Melbourne, and also the attack on a business in the outer suburbs of Melbourne," Mr Albanese said on Saturday night.

"The fact that people were having a peaceful dinner and were disrupted by this act of violence could have had catastrophic consequences."

On Sunday afternoon, police said they were also investigating antisemitic graffiti near a Holocaust museum in Elsternwick in Melbourne's south-east.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-07-07/victoria-government-taskforce-antisemitism-police/105501252

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109269

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23288326 (071000ZJUL25) Notable: Video: Pacific Islands vital in power struggle against China – Australia is intensifying efforts to counter China’s growing influence in the Pacific, turning to rugby and cultural ties as soft-power tools. Fijian Prime Minister Sitiveni Rabuka joined Anthony Albanese in Newcastle, where they awarded the Vuvale Bowl at a Wallabies match, underscoring what Albanese called the “Pacific family.” China has poured billions into regional infrastructure, while US aid cuts under Donald Trump have weakened Western influence. Rabuka said Fiji was “managing” but hoped for improvement within three years. Deputy Nationals Leader Kevin Hogan stressed China remained both a vital trading partner and a strategic concern. Sport, trust and cooperation are seen as central to securing regional alliances.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109248

Pacific Islands vital in power struggle against China

Sarah Swain - Jul 6, 2025

They are neighbours, friends and in many cases family, but now the Pacific Islands are being seen as vital in the struggle for power in our region.

With China's influence growing, Australia is pushing back, turning Wallabies into ambassadors.

Fijian Prime Minister Sitiveni Rabuka was the guest of honour in Newcastle as part of a charm offensive aimed at a pivotal player in the Pacific power struggle.

With China investing billions into infrastructure projects across the Pacific Islands, Australia and our allies – unable to compete financially –have turned to sport as part of a bigger-picture approach. Fijian workers on a specialty Pacific visa class were in the stands.

"We provide a lot of support for rugby in the Pacific – it's an important way of connecting up with a lot of young people," Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said.

"That essentially is about family. We are all part of the Pacific family - we have an important responsibility."

Rugby union is the code of choice for Fiji, with the new NRL team vital for Papua New Guinea, our nearest neighbour.

The contest for hearts and minds in the Pacific has been made harder with the Trump administration cuts to American financial aid in the region.

"We are managing, and in three years hopefully things will change," Rabuka said.

Deputy Nationals leader Kevin Hogan said "Obviously China are an important trading partner for us".

"We have issues with China - we have things we need to talk about their leadership as well," he told Sky's Agenda.

The prime ministers jointly presented the Vuvale bowl to the winning Wallabies today.

Trust and cooperation in uncertain times is a much bigger prize.

https://www.9news.com.au/national/pacific-island-relations-fiji-prime-minister-australia/af8486d6-8f16-428e-b440-1c2ebc558801

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2XJTfvbY9Ng

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109270

File: 01700f5845b8287⋯.jpg (86.98 KB,800x600,4:3,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 9d0d054070ccaa8⋯.png (730.29 KB,800x600,4:3,Clipboard.png)

File: 02e65bb3bb23e19⋯.png (678.32 KB,800x600,4:3,Clipboard.png)

File: 499115c413eec42⋯.jpg (143.97 KB,800x600,4:3,Clipboard.jpg)

File: de103dc5a5e8fa1⋯.png (987.22 KB,787x1091,787:1091,Clipboard.png)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23288425 (071042ZJUL25) Notable: Eight PNG men arrested over murder of ‘sorcery’ accused – Eight men in Papua New Guinea have been arrested for the torture and murder of Rosa Yakapus, accused of sorcery after her estranged husband’s suspected heart attack. Yakapus was stripped, tied to a pole over fire, tortured with hot implements and finally shot dead at a bridge, her body falling into a river. Police said suspects surrendered after community leaders intervened and face life sentences for torture, murder and illegal confinement. Prime Minister James Marape called the crime a “national shame”, while NGOs and Education Minister Lucas Dawa Dekena warned sorcery-violence is escalating and threatens PNG’s social fabric.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>73607 (pb)

>>109257

>>109258

Eight PNG men arrested over murder of ‘sorcery’ accused

STAFF WRITERS - 7 July 2025

Eight Papua New Guinean men have been arrested for the torture and murder of a young woman over a sorcery allegation, with the country’s Prime Minister condemning the horror act as a “national shame”.

The arrests were made after community leaders reportedly intervened and helped detain the men, who had subjected Rosa Yakapus to three days of extreme torture before shooting her dead in the impoverished Hela district.

The Australian reported at the weekend that Ms Yakapus was stripped naked and beaten before being tied to a pole over a fire, after her estranged husband died of a suspected heart attack and his relatives accused her of using witchcraft to kill him.

She was then taken to a bridge where, surrounded by laughing men, she was shot – with her body falling into the river below.

Villagers had alerted a local community police officer at a Margarima police station, less than 40 minutes’ drive from Ms Yakapus’s Ugu village, but without a car he couldn’t reach her in time.

Police Chief Superintendent Michael Welly said after the arrests the murder was “condemned by leaders at all levels as both criminal and barbaric”. He said local leaders had liaised with police to facilitate the “voluntary surrender” of the suspects, including the man who had shot Ms Yakapus dead.

Chief Superintendent Welly said more suspects had been identified and would also be detained. They faced charges of torture, murder and illegal confinement, and could be jailed for life if found guilty, he said.

Prime Minister James Marape welcomed the arrests, saying PNG had been embarrassed internationally by recurring incidents of sorcery accusation-related violence (SARV) and murders.

“This is not who we are. We are a Christian country. We are a country with laws,” he said. “This cannot continue. We must end this once and for all.”

James Komengi, one of a few NGO, church and police workers battling the violence in PNG’s Highlands, said he hoped there would now be a momentum towards preventing the brutality instead of reacting to it.

Mr Komengi, who had told The Australian he feared SARV would become normalised if the government didn’t address it, said: “My hope is that we take advantage of this momentum against perpetrators here to promote a change in the narratives for development towards taking a preventive approach instead of being reactive.”

PNG Education Minister Lucas Dawa Dekena said he feared the sharing of the videos of Ms Yakapus’s suffering highlighted the potential for normalisation of such violence.

“These are not just isolated incidents, they are a direct assault on the fabric of our society,” he said. “Such horrific acts have no place in Papua New Guinea.”

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/world/eight-png-men-arrested-over-murder-of-sorcery-accused/news-story/0148af5bc0f7ec764f31940e33eb1464

https://www.postcourier.com.pg/leaders-condemn-animalistic-behaviour-in-hela-killing/

https://www.postcourier.com.pg/lae-front-and-back-page/

https://www.postcourier.com.pg/sorcery-a-national-shame-must-end/

https://www.postcourier.com.pg/death-bed-accusation-leads-to-murder/

https://www.postcourier.com.pg/k50000-reward-offered-for-hela-murder-suspects1/

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109271

File: e69979aa8c50647⋯.jpg (163.49 KB,800x600,4:3,Clipboard.jpg)

File: ef082c090d2863c⋯.jpg (55.62 KB,482x597,482:597,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 26e1e23b1294af4⋯.jpg (14.77 KB,250x375,2:3,Clipboard.jpg)

File: e42018f8c1ec916⋯.jpg (9.87 KB,197x320,197:320,Clipboard.jpg)

File: ffa43a0fe105d98⋯.jpg (614.53 KB,852x710,6:5,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23288479 (071102ZJUL25) Notable: Q Post #4207 - The Armor of God - Finally, be strong in the Lord and in his mighty power. Put on the full armor of God, so that you can take your stand against the devil’s schemes. For our struggle is not against flesh and blood, but against the rulers, against the authorities, against the powers of this dark world and against the spiritual forces of evil in the heavenly realms. Therefore put on the full armor of God, so that when the day of evil comes, you may be able to stand your ground, and after you have done everything, to stand. Stand firm then, with the belt of truth buckled around your waist, with the breastplate of righteousness in place, and with your feet fitted with the readiness that comes from the gospel of peace. In addition to all this, take up the shield of faith, with which you can extinguish all the flaming arrows of the evil one. Take the helmet of salvation and the sword of the Spirit, which is the word of God. And pray in the Spirit on all occasions with all kinds of prayers and requests. With this in mind, be alert and always keep on praying for all the Lord’s people. Q - https://qanon.pub/#4207

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>73607 (pb)

>>109257

>>109258

>>109270

Eight suspects over sorcery torture and shooting in police custody

MIRIAM ZARRIGA - JULY 6, 2025

Police Commander Chief Superintendent Michael Welly said: “A woman in Magarima, Hela Province, tortured and murdered over accusations of Sorcery was condemned by leaders at all levels as both criminal and barbaric, prompting the immediate launch of a police-led manhunt supported by provincial and community leadership.”

Hela Governor Philip Undialu, Minister for Bougainville Affairs and Magarima MP, Manasseh Makiba, visited Magarima and formally launched the operation to pursue and apprehend the suspects. They appealed for community cooperation and the peaceful surrender of those involved.

By Saturday, PPC Welly said, “Local leaders, Magarima District CEO, and police teams engaged communities and facilitated voluntary surrenders.”

“Police units deployed from Tari conducted coordinated arrests on Sunday.”

Eight (8) suspects were taken into custody, including the individual who allegedly pulled the trigger,” PPC Welly confirmed.

All arrested persons have been transported to Tari Police Station for formal processing.

He confirmed additional suspects have been positively identified.

“Some individuals are believed to be from Biango Village, Kandep District, Enga Province, requiring cross-border cooperation with Enga police.”

Sorcery-related killings are fully prosecutable under PNG’s Criminal Code. The Sorcery Act was repealed in 2013, making it clear that sorcery accusations do not justify violence.

Offenders are subject to charges including murder, torture, and unlawful confinement, with potential penalties of life imprisonment, PPC Welly added.

“The success of this operation underscores the importance of proactive leadership and strong community-police collaboration. Hela Province continues to demonstrate that justice is achievable when leaders work on the ground with law enforcement.”

“The direct involvement of Governor Undialu and Minister Makiba, coupled with decisive police action, sends a strong message: sorcery-related violence will not be tolerated in Hela Province.”

https://www.postcourier.com.pg/eight-suspects-over-sorcery-torture-and-shooting-in-police-custody/

https://www.postcourier.com.pg/k50000-reward-offered-for-hela-murder-suspects1/

Q Post #4207

May 11 2020 12:05:59 (EST)

The Armor of God

Finally, be strong in the Lord and in his mighty power. Put on the full armor of God, so that you can take your stand against the devil’s schemes. For our struggle is not against flesh and blood, but against the rulers, against the authorities, against the powers of this dark world and against the spiritual forces of evil in the heavenly realms. Therefore put on the full armor of God, so that when the day of evil comes, you may be able to stand your ground, and after you have done everything, to stand. Stand firm then, with the belt of truth buckled around your waist, with the breastplate of righteousness in place, and with your feet fitted with the readiness that comes from the gospel of peace. In addition to all this, take up the shield of faith, with which you can extinguish all the flaming arrows of the evil one. Take the helmet of salvation and the sword of the Spirit, which is the word of God.

And pray in the Spirit on all occasions with all kinds of prayers and requests. With this in mind, be alert and always keep on praying for all the Lord’s people.

Q

https://qanon.pub/#4207

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109272

File: 18ac38b1137139c⋯.jpg (161.06 KB,1280x720,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23293950 (080956ZJUL25) Notable: Anthony Albanese to launch plan to tackle anti-Semitism ‘in days’ – Anthony Albanese will unveil a new anti-Semitism strategy with special envoy Jillian Segal after synagogue and restaurant attacks in Melbourne. Albanese labelled anti-Semitism a “scourge” and pledged stronger protections for Jewish schools, synagogues and organisations. Segal’s plan, informed by the Executive Council of Australian Jewry’s 15-point blueprint, is expected to focus on violent slogans, education reforms and visa rules. Alex Ryvchin, co-chief executive of the Executive Council of Australian Jewry, said recent events showed “a violent ideology that not only chants ‘death to Zionists’ but threatens police, elected officials and public safety … the intifada is being globalised.”

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109251

>>109252

>>109268

Anthony Albanese to launch plan to tackle anti-Semitism ‘in days’

RICHARD FERGUSON - 8 July 2025

1/2

A new strategy to combat hate will be unveiled by Anthony ­Albanese and his special envoy on anti-Semitism after a resurgence of ­attacks on the Jewish community over the weekend.

Jewish leader Jillian Segal is working on a comprehensive set of proposals for Labor to consider, following the alleged attempted firebombing of a synagogue and the trashing of an Israeli restaurant in Melbourne.

The Prime Minister on Tuesday said he was committed to working with Ms Segal to end the “scourge” of anti-Semitism, but dismissed Sussan Ley’s call for an emergency national cabinet to discuss the hate-crime crisis.

“Jillian Segal has been doing a terrific job, and over the coming days we’ll have more to say. But, of course, we have responded substantially with increased security for synagogues, for Jewish schools, for community organisations,” Mr Albanese said in ­Hobart.

“We’ll continue to engage constructively with the community to make sure that they get the support that they need. Anti-Semitism is a scourge. It has no place in Australia. And what we saw in Melbourne with the ­attacks that occurred are reprehensible, deserve condemnation and the gentleman concerned at the synagogue has been arrested and he should face the full force of the law.”

The Australian understands Ms Segal’s plan will incorporate elements of an Executive Council of Australian Jewry blueprint on combating anti-Semitism, which was released in February.

Sources close to the process believe the Segal proposal will not adopt all 15 points of the ECAJ plan, which includes a clampdown on violent anti-Israel slogans at protests, a new strategy to stamp out bigotry in classrooms, and a tightening of visa rules to keep anti-Semites out of ­Australia.

But ECAJ co-chief executive Alex Ryvchin on Tuesday said he was pleased Mr Albanese was working closely with Ms Segal to “implement the policy responses the community has called for”.

“The events in Melbourne have, yet again, shown that we are confronted with a violent ideology that not only chants ‘death to Zionists’ but threatens the police, elected officials and public safety,” Mr Ryvchin told The ­Australian.

“They want to turn our CBDs into no-go zones and to pit groups of Australians against each other. They have infiltrated campuses, schools, cultural institutions. The intifada is being globalised exactly as promised.

“We await the government’s announcement on how it intends to restore public order and drive anti-Semitism back to the dark peripheries of society.”

Mr Albanese on Tuesday ­appeared to oppose the suggestion of a cross-jurisdictional taskforce on anti-Semitism when asked about merging state and federal police efforts.

“We have a task force and what we do is take on security issues, we take advice from security agencies,” he said. “That’s precisely what we have done.”

He nonetheless said that he had been receptive to requests by Jewish leaders about stemming rising anti-Semitism.

“I spoke with Jewish community leaders on Saturday,” he said. “Every time there has been a request, it has been met, ­expeditiously, and that has ­occurred.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109273

File: 9c4dc0c7d1fbed4⋯.jpg (3.88 MB,5000x3750,4:3,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 960eae7b474c698⋯.jpg (342.93 KB,1920x1080,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23293962 (081002ZJUL25) Notable: Three charged over altercation at Israeli-owned restaurant Miznon in Melbourne CBD – Three people have been charged after protesters stormed Israeli-owned restaurant Miznon in Melbourne on Friday night, hurling chairs and damaging a glass door. Police allege the accused — a 50-year-old man, a 48-year-old woman and a 28-year-old woman — left a Swanston Street protest before targeting the venue. The incident occurred the same night as a synagogue arson attack and car fires in Greensborough, though police say no links are established. Miznon, partly owned by Gaza Humanitarian Foundation spokesman Shahar Segal, said it “welcomes people of all backgrounds” and condemned the violence.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109251

>>109252

>>109263

Three charged over altercation at Israeli-owned restaurant Miznon in Melbourne CBD

abc.net.au - 8 July 2025

Three people have been charged with assault, riotous behaviour and criminal damage after a group of protesters converged on an Israeli-owned restaurant in Melbourne's CBD on Friday night.

The group was a part of a larger cohort which had gathered on Swanston Street to protest the need for police presence at public demonstrations.

Police said about 20 people left that group about 8:15pm and went to the Miznon restaurant in Hardware Lane where patrons were having dinner.

Police allege several people in the group were involved in an altercation, where chairs were thrown and a glass door was damaged.

Three people — a 50-year-old man from Richmond, a 48-year-old woman from Footscray and a 28-year-old woman from Essendon have been charged with assault, affray, riotous behaviour and criminal damage.

The incident occurred on the same night as a string of antisemitic incidents.

On Friday night the door of a synagogue in East Melbourne was set alight while 20 congregants were inside.

Angelo Loras, 34, has been charged over that incident.

A business in the north-eastern suburb of Greensborough also had three cars torched about 4:30am the next day.

Police said on Monday no links between any of the incidents had been identified.

Miznon restaurant says venue welcomes people of all backgrounds

In a statement posted to social media, the group behind a No Police at Protests movement said it targeted the restaurant because it was part-owned by Israeli businessman Shahar Segal.

Mr Segal is a spokesperson for the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, an Israeli and US-backed organisation that has been criticised for how it distributes aid in Gaza.

But the group denied that incident was linked to the attack at the synagogue.

"Pro-Palestinian activists have never attacked places of worship, and we condemn such attacks," the statement read.

A statement released by Miznon on Tuesday said the events on Friday had had a "profound impact" on staff.

"We are a restaurant, a place of hospitality, of warmth and welcome. Our greatest joy is to feed people from every background and viewpoint and to see the joy on people's faces as they enjoy our food and each other's company. That is our purpose and our objective," the statement read.

"All our staff and customers are coming from different background and cultures. We respect everyone's right to their own nationality and religion. We ask for the same.

"All we wish to do moving forward, is to keep feeding anyone who comes through our doors with love, attention and care while supplying a safe working space for our employees."

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-07-08/three-charged-melbourne-israeli-restaurant-miznon/105507930

https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2025/7/8/three-charged-after-protest-at-israeli-owned-restaurant-in-australia

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109274

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23293966 (081009ZJUL25) Notable: Video: Deadline looms for Trump's liberation day tariffs - Australian products bound for America may be stuck with tariffs. This comes after the Albanese government has indicated it would not offer extra incentives to the Trump administration. - 9 News Australia

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>73550 (pb)

>>73596 (pb)

Deadline looms for Trump's liberation day tariffs

9 News Australia

Jul 7, 2025

Australian products bound for America may be stuck with tariffs. This comes after the Albanese government has indicated it would not offer extra incentives to the Trump administration.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v4QRL0ha4CA

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109275

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23293989 (081021ZJUL25) Notable: Video: Benjamin Netanyahu nominates Trump for Nobel Peace Prize – Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has nominated US President Donald Trump for the Nobel Peace Prize, citing his “bold leadership” in brokering the Abraham Accords and pursuing peace in the Middle East. Netanyahu said Trump’s leadership showed “dialogue, not extremism,” while warning a Palestinian state would be “a platform to destroy Israel.” Trump, fresh from ordering strikes on Iranian nuclear sites, confirmed Iran had requested talks. Netanyahu set three red lines for a ceasefire with Hamas: its destruction, exile of its leaders, and disarmament. Washington, Qatar and Egypt are brokering a 60-day ceasefire deal.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>>/qresearch/23224390 (pb)

>>>/qresearch/23224392 (pb)

Benjamin Netanyahu nominates Trump for Nobel Peace Prize

JOE KELLY - 8 July 2025

1/2

Benjamin Netanyahu has nominated Donald Trump for the Nobel Peace Prize because of his efforts in reshaping the Middle East, but warned a Palestinian state would only serve as a “platform to destroy Israel” amid ongoing ceasefire talks with Hamas.

The Israeli Prime Minister strengthened his case with the administration for the Jewish state to retain control over security in Gaza as part of any long-term political settlement, but was optimistic that a broader peace in the region could be achieved.

Mr Trump also said that he was pursuing talks with Iran after ordering a US-led bombing strike on three of the rogue nation’s nuclear enrichment sites last month, declaring that “they’ve requested a meeting and I’m going to go to a meeting.”

“If we can put something down on paper that would be fine, that would be good. I think they’ve gained a lot of respect for us.”

Mr Netanyahu presented the US President with the letter he sent to the Nobel prize committee in a gesture aimed at projecting deep friendship and common cause with America. The letter praised Mr Trump for his “steadfast and exceptional dedication to promoting peace, security, and stability around the world.”

“President Trump’s vision and bold leadership promoted innovative diplomacy defined not by conflict and extremism but by co-operation, dialogue, and shared prosperity,” Mr Netanyahu said in the letter, dated July 1.

“Foremost among these achievements was President Trump’s pivotal role in facilitating the Abraham Accords. These groundbreaking agreements established formal diplomatic relations between Israel and several Arab nations – including the United Arab Emirates, Bahrain and Morocco.”

Sitting across from Mr Trump, Mr Netanyahu said he wanted to “express the appreciation and admiration, not only of all Israelis, but of the Jewish people and many, many admirers around the world for your leadership.’

“The President has already realised great opportunities. He forged the Abraham Accords. He’s forging peace as we speak in one country and one region after the other,” he said. “So, I want to present to you Mr President the letter I sent to the Nobel prize Committee. It’s nominating you for the peace prize which is well deserved and you should get it.”

Both leaders, who were accompanied by their top advisers for an official dinner in the White House Blue Room, framed the 12-day war between Israel and Iran as a key victory which had changed the strategic outlook for the region.

“They (Iran) took a big drubbing I think when we hit the three sites really,” Mr Trump said. “That was the very beginning of the end.”

A meeting with Iran is expected within the next week or so, with the US President suggesting that further details would be announced on Tuesday local time.

Pressed on whether be still believed in a two state solution in the Middle East, Mr Trump threw the “age old” question to Mr Netanyahu who said that he believed Palestinians should have “all the powers to govern themselves, but none of the powers to threaten us.”

“And that means that certain powers like overall security will always remain in our hands. Now that is a fact. And no-one in Israel will agree to anything else because we don’t commit suicide. We want life,” he said. “We cherish life for ourselves, for our neighbours. I think we can work out a peace for us and the entire Middle East with President Trump’s leadership. And by working together I think we can establish a very, very broad peace that will include all our neighbours.”

He said that Hamas had failed to build a future for the people of Gaza but had instead “built down into bunkers, into terror tunnels after which they massacred our people, raped our women, beheaded our men, invaded our cities and our towns and out kibbutzim.”

“So people aren’t likely to say ‘let’s just give them another state’ – it will be a platform to destroy Israel. We’ll work out a peace with our Palestinian neighbours, those who don’t want to destroy us. And we’ll work out a peace in which our security, the sovereign power of security always remains in our hands.”

“Now people will say ‘it’s not a complete state, it’s not a state’ … We don’t care. You know, we vowed never again,” he said.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109276

File: eebddea18e11931⋯.jpg (132.46 KB,1280x721,1280:721,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 44e3a236693e25b⋯.jpg (213.19 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23294002 (081028ZJUL25) Notable: Albanese rebuffs China on two key requests ahead of visit – Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has rejected Beijing’s push to add artificial intelligence to the China-Australia Free Trade Agreement and ruled out easing foreign investment restrictions, ahead of his six-day trip to China. Albanese will meet President Xi Jinping, Premier Li Qiang and Zhao Leji, Chairman of the National People’s Congress and China’s third-highest ranking leader. Treasurer Jim Chalmers confirmed no relaxation of investment scrutiny, citing national security. Business leaders including Andrew Forrest and Shemara Wikramanayake will attend a CEO Roundtable, with Forrest urging green iron–steel cooperation as a “profound” bilateral opportunity.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>73560 (pb)

>>109229

>>109232

Anthony Albanese confirms meeting with Chinese President Xi Jinping during China trip

Anthony Albanese is set to meet with Chinese President Xi Jinping, where he is expected to discuss key issues including trade and tourism.

Jessica Wang - July 8, 2025

Anthony Albanese has stressed the importance of Australia’s $325bn trade relationship with China ahead of his six day visit to Shanghai, Beijing and Chengdu, with the Prime Minister to meet with Chinese Communist Party President Xi Jingping and other senior officials.

The centrepiece of the trip will be the Australia-China Annual Leaders’ Meeting in Beijing which he will attend alongside Chinese Premier Li Qiang, and where he will also meet Mr Xi and Chairman of the National People’s Congress, Zhao Leji – the third highest ranking person of the CCP.

Discussions will be focused on global and regional issues, plus bilateral co-operation on areas including trade and tourism. China accounts for nearly 26 per cent of Australia’s total goods and service trade.

China will also raise desires to open the China-Australia Free Trade Agreement to include AI, healthcare, green energy and the digital economy.

Mr Albanese, who has faced criticism for failing to secure a meeting with US President Donald Trump before his face-to-face with Mr Xi, has defended the trip, saying he intended to “continue to co-operate with China where we can” and “disagree where we must, and engage in our national interest”.

“Trade is now flowing freely, to the benefit of both countries and to people and businesses on both sides,” Mr Albanese said.

“We will continue to patiently and deliberately work towards a stable relationship with China, with dialogue at its core.

“I will raise issues that are important to Australians and the region including my government’s enduring commitment to pursuing Australia’s national interest.”

A 14-person business delegation will also accompany Mr Albanese at a Australia–China CEO Roundtable, which will be hosted by the Business Council of Australia and include leaders from industries representing banking, resources, tertiary education and food.

This includes ANZ International’s managing director Simon Ireland, BHP Australia president Geraldine Slattery, Fortescue Metals Group executive chairman Andrew Forrest, Rio Tinto chief executive Kellie Parker, SunRice chief executive Paul Serra and UNSW Vice-Chancellor and president Attila Brungs.

BCA chief executive Bran Black said Australia’s relationship with China was a “partnership that matters deeply to our nation’s success”.

“With one in four Australian jobs trade dependent, it’s imperative that our businesses are part of the solution in identifying further opportunities with both new and existing partners,” he said.

“The Australia-China CEO Roundtable is a crucial forum for building an even stronger relationship with our largest economic partner, particularly in the resources, energy and services sectors.”

Mr Albanese is also set to meet with business, tourism and sport leaders when he visits Shanghai and Chendgu, the latter which is home to the giant panda research base, which is where Adelaide Zoo acquired two new giant pandas, Xing Qiu and Yi Lan, in late 2024.

This will be Mr Albanese’s second visit to China.

https://www.news.com.au/national/politics/anthony-albanese-confirms-meeting-with-chinese-president-xi-jinping-during-china-trip/news-story/e1419c003ef467c451528b5333767bbe

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109277

File: 95ff41a0a3b0481⋯.jpg (1.72 MB,5445x3630,3:2,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 9ad35d347c7db99⋯.jpg (1.03 MB,3624x2416,3:2,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23294037 (081051ZJUL25) Notable: OPINION: China is open to free trade in AI with Australia“China-Australia relations have stabilised and improved, achieving a comprehensive turnaround. At the 10th anniversary of the implementation of ChAFTA, we are willing to review the agreement with a more open attitude and higher standard, further consolidate co-operation in traditional areas such as agriculture and mining, and actively explore new growth areas in emerging fields like artificial intelligence, healthcare, green energy, and the digital economy. China is willing to work with Australia to build consensus on international and regional issues, jointly safeguard regional peace and stability, uphold international rules and order, advocate for free trade.” – Xiao Qian, ambassador of the People’s Republic of China to Australia - AFR

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109276

>>109230

Opinion: China is open to free trade in AI with Australia

On the 10th anniversary of free trade deal, China is willing to review the agreement and actively explore new growth areas in emerging fields.

Xiao Qian, Ambassador to Australia - Jul 7, 2025

1/2

Over the past three years, through the joint efforts of both sides, China-Australia relations have stabilised and improved, achieving a comprehensive turnaround.

President Xi Jinping and Prime Minister Anthony Albanese have met on three occasions. Premier Li Qiang and Prime Minister Albanese have exchanged successful visits. Mechanisms for dialogue and exchange across various sectors have been resumed, mutual understanding enhanced, and practical co-operation between the two nations expanded. Facts have proven that the healthy and stable development of China-Australia relations serves the interests of both countries and enjoys the firm support of the two peoples.

Not long ago, the Australian Labor government was re-elected and sworn into office, ushering in the second decade of the China-Australia Comprehensive Strategic Partnership and another important epoch of development.

At present, both China and Australia are faced with new economic development tasks. China is committed to advancing high-quality development, while Australia is devoted to enhancing productivity. We look forward to further strengthening co-operation between the two sides so as to bring more benefits to both countries and peoples.

First, strengthening high-level guidance and consolidating institutional dialogue and exchanges. Since the establishment of diplomatic ties, China-Australia relations have demonstrated resilience and vitality, weathering ups and downs, with the key lying in the strategic guidance of the leaders of the two countries.

China has always viewed Australia and China-Australia relations from a strategic and long-term perspective, committed to advancing bilateral ties beyond stabilisation and towards progress.

China is willing to work with Australia to maintain the momentum of high-level engagement, make the most of such primary intergovernmental dialogue mechanisms as the China-Australia Leaders’ Annual Meeting, the Foreign and Strategic Dialogue, the Strategic Economic Dialogue, the Joint Ministerial Economic Commission, as well as the Ministerial Dialogue on Climate Change, continuously enhance communication, deepen mutual trust, build consensus, and promote co-operation.

Second, expanding practical co-operation across all fields. China and Australia are natural partners with complementary economic strengths. Over the past decade since the China-Australia Free Trade Agreement (ChAFTA) came into effect, it has served as an important engine in boosting bilateral economic and trade co-operation.

China has been Australia’s largest trading partner, largest export destination and the largest source of imports for 16 consecutive years. With a population of more than 1.4 billion, including more than 400 million middle-income earners, China provides a vast and stable consumption market for Australian minerals, wine, beef, lobster and other products.

At the 10th anniversary of the implementation of ChAFTA, we are willing to review the agreement with a more open attitude and higher standard, further consolidate co-operation in traditional areas such as agriculture and mining, and actively explore new growth areas in emerging fields like artificial intelligence, healthcare, green energy, and the digital economy, elevating practical co-operation to new heights.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109278

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23299361 (090930ZJUL25) Notable: Video: Copper, pharma tariffs are coming as Trump hardens trade stance – US President Donald Trump has ruled out further extensions to negotiate new trade deals beyond August 1, warning countries to accept bilateral agreements or face steep tariffs. The White House announced 50 per cent tariffs on copper imports, sending prices to record highs, while Trump flagged pharmaceutical tariffs could reach 200 per cent after a short grace period. China, which reached a temporary framework in June, has until August 12 to finalise a permanent deal. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said tariffs have already raised $100bn in 2025 and could reach $300bn by year’s end.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109274

Copper, pharma tariffs are coming as Trump hardens trade stance

ANITA HAMILTON - 9 July 2025

1/2

US President Donald Trump has hardened his stance on trade deals, saying there would be no more extensions past a new August 1 deadline, as the administration said it would continue to announce country-specific tariff rates.

Mr Trump said during a cabinet meeting on Tuesday (local time) that he would continue issuing letters to the leaders of other countries announcing US tariff rates on their products effective August 1 unless they arranged a specific deal by then.

In addition, the White House said it would set 50 per cent tariffs on copper imports on Wednesday (AEST), an announcement that sent the commodity’s price to a record, though it did not clarify when they would take effect.

And tariffs on imported pharmaceutical products would kick in after a grace period giving companies time to adjust their supply chains, Mr Trump said.

It was part of a swirl of trade announcements in the past few days as the Trump administration hurtles toward a self-imposed deadline for so-called reciprocal tariff rates to kick in after a 90-day pause. That deadline is Wednesday (local time).

In a post on his Truth Social platform on Wednesday (AEST), Mr Trump said: “We will be releasing a minimum of 7 Countries having to do with trade, tomorrow morning, with an additional number of Countries being released in the afternoon.”

Mr Trump has taken to settling the tariff question himself, favouring a unilateral approach and announcing his decisions by letter and posts on social media.

“The deals are mostly my deal to them,” Mr Trump said. “We’re picking a number that’s low and fair.”

It follows the example Mr Trump set on Monday, when he released 14 letters addressed to the leaders of countries scattered mostly across Asia and Europe. The letters set US tariff rates on imports from those countries at between 25 per cent and 40 per cent.

Mr Trump said during Tuesday’s cabinet meeting that he considers the letters to be deals.

The US will be sending a letter to the EU this week. “We’re probably two days off from sending them a letter, ” he said.

It is emblematic of Mr Trump’s approach to trade, which has been to threaten high levies to draw countries to the bilateral negotiating table, then to pause those levies while deals are being worked out, then to draw a new line in the sand.

Just a few trade deals have been announced since Mr Trump’s “Liberation Day” tariff announcement on April 2, which he then paused a few days later, including deals with the UK and Vietnam. A current deal with China is temporary and expires in August, slightly after the deadline now applied to other countries.

Mr Trump now says there will not be any more extensions to negotiate new deals after August 1.

Mr Trump’s tariff letters on Monday, which were nearly identical to each other, also explained that goods shipped through third countries to avoid tariffs would still face the same levies, and that the rates would go up if countries retaliated.

The current tariffs have brought in $100bn so far this year, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said during Tuesday’s cabinet meeting. He added that tariff revenue could rise to $300bn by the end of 2025.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109279

File: ffdc92ffa5bd695⋯.mp4 (8.06 MB,960x540,16:9,Clipboard.mp4)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23299395 (090942ZJUL25) Notable: Video: Donald Trump flags tariffs of 200pc on pharmaceuticals, 50pc on copper – US President Donald Trump has warned pharmaceutical imports could face a 200 per cent tariff, with drug makers given up to 18 months to shift production to America. The move threatens Australia’s $2.2bn export industry, with $1.4bn worth bound for the US last year, more than 40 per cent of total pharmaceutical exports. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said a final decision would follow an inquiry due this month. Trump also announced copper would face a 50 per cent tariff by early August. Australia exported $55m of copper to the US last year, less than 1 per cent of its $6.7bn global sales.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109274

>>109278

Donald Trump flags tariffs of 200pc on pharmaceuticals, 50pc on copper

Brad Ryan - 9 July 2025

Donald Trump has flagged a possible 200 per cent tariff on pharmaceuticals - one of Australia's biggest exports to the US - but says manufacturers will be given time to move to America to dodge the tax.

The US president also said copper was likely to be hit with a 50 per cent tariff.

To date, pharmaceuticals and copper have both been exempt from the US's ever-evolving tariffs regime, pending two separate investigations by the Department of Commerce.

But Mr Trump has long railed against American dependence on foreign producers of the products, given the lifesaving nature of many imported medicines and copper's importance to the industrial sector and technological innovation.

Speaking to the media before a cabinet meeting, Mr Trump said pharmaceutical producers would get a grace period to move production to the US.

"We're going to give [drug manufacturers] about a year, a year and a half to come in, and after that, they're going to be tariffed," he said.

"They're going to be tariffed at a very, very high rate, like 200 per cent. We'll give them a certain period of time to get their act together."

A $2b industry

Pharmaceutical tariffs could be particularly punishing for Australia.

Last year, Australia exported $US1.4 billion ($2.2 billion) in pharmaceutical products to the US, according to the UN's Comtrade database.

That was more than 40 per cent of its total pharmaceutical export value of $US3.2 billion ($4.9 billion).

Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick later suggested a final decision on pharmaceutical tariffs had not been made.

His department's investigation into pharmaceutical imports would be completed at the end of the month, he said.

"And so the president will then set his policies," Mr Lutnick told business network CNBC. "And I'm going to let him wait to decide how he's going to do it.

"He said, if you don't build in America, they're going to be a high rate. But he may consider that if you're building in America, to give you the time to build … and then the tariff will be much higher."

America's pharmaceutical industry has long been frustrated with Australia's Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme, which forces drug companies to negotiate prices with the Australian government rather than individual buyers.

It is designed to keep prices down by giving purchasing power to the government. Pharmaceutical industry leaders in the US have lobbied the Trump administration to impose retaliatory tariffs on Australia.

Copper tariff due within weeks

Copper is also a significant export product for Australia, but sales to the US last year were valued at just $US36 million ($55 million) — less than 1 per cent of Australia's total copper exports, which were valued at $US4.4 billion ($6.7 billion).

"Today, we're doing copper," Mr Trump said after speaking through some of his past tariff announcements. "I believe the tariff on copper, we're going to make it 50 per cent."

Of all the US's trading partners, Chile will feel the effects of the tariff most. It supplies the majority of the US's copper imports.

Mr Lutnick said the copper tariff would probably take effect at the end of July or start of August. Aluminium and steel are already subject to 50 per cent tariffs.

The announcements come a day after Mr Trump released letters he had sent to foreign leaders, which outlined new country-specific tariffs to take effect on August 1.

Australia, however, is not expecting an increase in the 10 per cent tariff already imposed on its exports.

On Monday, the Productivity Commission released modelling that projected Australia could enjoy a small economic benefit from Mr Trump's tariffs.

But the commission also warned that an escalating global trade war would be "very bad for Australia".

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-07-09/donald-trump-tariffs-copper-pharmaceutical-imports/105509914

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109280

File: 2a9c7da28bc5467⋯.jpg (387.75 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 370bacadb7ce6a0⋯.jpg (203.91 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23299419 (090957ZJUL25) Notable: PBS ‘not on the table’ in battle for pharmaceutical tariff exemption, despite lobbying – Donald Trump’s threat of tariffs up to 200 per cent on pharmaceuticals has raised fears for Australia’s $18bn Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS), which subsidises 930 medicines. The US pharmaceutical lobby has urged Trump to leverage trade talks, calling PBS pricing “damaging” and restrictive. Treasurer Jim Chalmers insisted the PBS was “not on the table”. Trump’s May 12 “Most Favoured Nation” executive order would bar US buyers from paying more than the lowest global price, pressuring drug firms to lift prices abroad or risk exclusion, a move that could deter them from selling in Australia.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109274

>>109278

PBS ‘not on the table’ in battle for pharmaceutical tariff exemption, despite lobbying

The threat of global 200 per cent tariffs on pharmaceutical products presents a challenge to Australia’s drug subsidy scheme after foreign lobbyists pushed for it to be leveraged in trade negotiations.

JAMES DOWLING - 9 July 2025

1/2

US President Donald Trump has threatened to expand his sweeping global trade war by pushing tariffs on pharmaceutical products as high as 200 per cent, raising fears for the future of Australia’s cheap medicines.

The tariff threats follow aggressive lobbying by the US pharmaceutical industry explicitly targeting Australia’s Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme – with pharmaceutical giants hoping to “leverage ongoing trade negotiations” against the PBS.

Treasurer Jim Chalmers reassured the nation on Wednesday that the PBS was “not on the table” in any bilateral negotiations with the US but markets are nervous and uncertainty is rife.

Tariffs threatened

Mr Trump floated the potential tariff to reporters at a cabinet meeting on Tuesday amid broader discussion of his nation-specific global tariffs, setting a zero-exemption August 1 deadline ahead of the reintroduction of his “Liberation Day” tariffs on July 9.

“We will be announcing something very soon on pharmaceuticals,” he said.

There would be a grace period of up to 1½ years to give companies time to adjust their supply chains, he said, but once instituted the tariff rate could range as high as 200 per cent. It would drastically shift the balance of trade with Australia’s largest pharmaceutical importer, meaning Australia and local companies would find little appetite for their products, while patients remained reliant on American imports.

Lobbyists attack PBS

Australia has been targeted aggressively by the US pharmaceutical lobby since the appointment of the Trump administration over accusations that the PBS has undervalued US products and stymied innovation.

The Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America (PhRMA) group urged Mr Trump to pull the PBS into tariff negotiations and drive up Australian pharmaceutical prices in the process.

PhRMA said in a January submission to the US trade review that US companies were the “constant target of compulsory licensing and other harmful practices” by Australia and the PBS.

“Biopharmaceutical innovators in the US face a wide array of damaging government pricing policies abroad,” it wrote.

PhRMA’s submission placed Australia and four other jurisdictions, including the EU, on a “watch list” for the Trump administration to consider; a further 19 countries, including Canada, were placed on a “priority watch list”.

“Australia undervalues new innovative medicines by setting prices based on older inferior medicines and generics, and through use of low and outdated monetary thresholds per year of life gained from clinically proven treatments,” PhRMA said more recently.

“In addition, government assessments often restrict access to a small subset of the patient population for which the regulator determines the product to be safe and effective and additionally create considerable patient access delays through unnecessary data requirements and other administrative hurdles.”

Given the relatively small market Australia presents to global pharmaceutical corporations, the competitiveness of negotiations with the Pharmaceutical Benefits Advisory Committee – which evaluates and negotiates which drugs should be on the PBS – has been a point of constant friction.

The Australian pharmaceutical industry

The US makes up about 40 per cent of Australia’s pharmaceutical export share, more than double our next largest customer, New Zealand. Australia is a far bigger pharmaceutical importer than exporter and takes about 20 per cent of its drugs from the US.

A shock to prices bilaterally could up-end deals forged under the PBS and drive up prices for vulnerable patients accessing new treatments outside of the subsidised system.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109281

File: efbec02247dc774⋯.jpg (327.67 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23299427 (091009ZJUL25) Notable: Top brass in danger as ADF faces overhaul – Defence Minister Richard Marles is preparing sweeping reforms that could cut up to 25 star-ranked ADF officers and 20–40 senior Defence executives amid budget blowouts, delivery delays and Trump administration demands for 3.5 per cent of GDP defence spending. Plans include merging procurement and weapons agencies into a new armaments directorate, with cuts achieved via attrition and severance. Critics say top leadership, including Defence secretary Greg Moriarty, has failed to deliver results. With ships out of service, Collins submarines ageing, and personnel shortages of 5000, analysts warn of a “paper ADF.”

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>73555 (pb)

>>109229

Top brass in danger as ADF faces overhaul

BEN PACKHAM - 8 July 2025

1/2

Dozens of senior ADF officers and Defence public servants are facing the chop as Richard Marles prepares to roll out sweeping ­reforms amid ongoing tension over budget blowouts and delays in getting new weapons and equipment into service.

Up to 25 star-ranked Australian Defence Force commanders could be forced out in the “everything’s on the table” overhaul, while 20 to 40 senior public service positions could be cut.

The government is also considering the creation of a new ­armaments directorate that would roll together the department’s vast and underperforming Capability Acquisition and Sustainment Group with its Guided Weapons and Explosive Ordnance Enterprise, and the Naval Shipbuilding and Sustainment Group.

Mr Marles, the Defence Minister, flagged the reforms last month, saying the department needed to be “fit for purpose”.

The overhaul comes as the Defence budget is stretched to the limit by the AUKUS submarine program and new frigate projects, sparking warnings of a hollowed-out force with scarce munitions and a shortage of critical capabilities, including missile defence systems and long-range weapons.

At the same time, the government is refusing to lift defence spending from 2 per cent of GDP to the 3.5 percent demanded by the Trump administration.

Mr Marles’ office declined to provide details of his reform plan when approached by The Australian, while a senior government source said the extent of the personnel cuts was yet to be finalised.

The reduction in senior officers and department executives is likely to be achieved through ­attrition and severance packages.

The ADF is one of the most top-heavy militaries in the world, with one study revealing Australian star-ranked officers are ­responsible for 11 times fewer personnel than their US counterparts. Multiple sources said internal discussions on the reforms warned star-ranked officer numbers could be slashed by 10 per cent, while even deeper cuts were being considered for the department’s senior executives.

They said the changes were aimed at sharpening the accountability of senior decision-makers and getting people with the right skills into the right roles.

Mr Marles has become ­increasingly frustrated with his department over its ability to ­deliver on the government’s plans to transform the ADF into a modern force capable of projecting power over long distances.

The tensions were underscored by a recent Auditor-General’s report that revealed Defence failed for nearly 2½ years to provide formal updates to Mr Marles on the readiness of the army, air force and navy.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109282

File: d82f35b35d1a68f⋯.jpg (276.5 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: ba32f7aa8458074⋯.jpg (101.42 KB,1280x720,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23299470 (091030ZJUL25) Notable: Giggle v Tickle: Courtroom sequel in clash over women-only spaces – Sall Grover, founder of the Giggle for Girls app, has appealed a Federal Court ruling that she unlawfully discriminated against transgender woman Roxanne Tickle by excluding her from the women-only platform. Justice Robert Bromwich had found Grover indirectly discriminated against Tickle, awarding $10,000 in damages. Grover’s appeal argues the app qualifies as a lawful “special measure” under the Sex Discrimination Act to redress disadvantages faced by biological women. The case, set for August, has drawn interventions from the Sex Discrimination Commissioner and the Lesbian Action Group, underscoring its national significance.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>73621 (pb)

>>>/qresearch/23212894 (pb)

Giggle v Tickle: Courtroom sequel in clash over women-only spaces

STEPHEN RICE - July 08, 2025

1/2

A ruling that a trans­gender woman was discriminated against when rejected from a ­female-only networking app is set to be challenged on the grounds that the judge failed to consider that the platform was designed to overcome the real disadvantages faced by biological women.

Sall Grover, creator of the ­Giggle for Girls app, has lodged an appeal seeking to overturn last year’s Federal Court ruling that she unlawfully discriminated against Roxanne Tickle, a biological male who identifies as a woman, by barring her from the app.

The finding by judge Robert Bromwich that “sex is changeable” and non-binary caused some shockwaves around the country, with some legal experts arguing it would make it impossible to exclude men from any female spaces if they claimed to be women.

Ms Tickle, who underwent gender-affirming surgery in 2019, was accepted into the app in February 2021 after an analysis of a “selfie” by Giggle’s third-party ­artificial intelligence tool, but was later blocked when Ms Grover surveyed the image herself.

Justice Bromwich found that Ms Grover had indirectly, but not directly, discriminated against Ms Tickle when she removed her from the app because she did not look sufficiently female, and ordered her to pay Ms Tickle $10,000, as well as her legal costs.

Ms Grover’s appeal will be heard over four days in August in the Full Court of the Federal Court, before justices Melissa Perry, Geoffrey Kennett and Wendy Abraham.

In a reflection of the extraordinary legal significance of the case, the court has granted leave to both the Sex Discrimination Commissioner and the Lesbian Action Group to intervene in the appeal.

Each side has recruited heavyweight legal teams, with Ms Grover represented by Sydney silk Noel Hutley, while Victorian Bar Council member Georgina Costello is likely to appear for Ms Tickle.

While much of Ms Tickle’s legal work has been done pro bono, Ms Grover has had to fund her own case through her Giggle crowd-funding website.

Ms Grover’s appeal team will claim that Justice Bromwich failed to consider the broader context of the Sex Discrimination Act, arguing that the app’s female-only policy was a special measure intended to address the unique disadvan­tages faced by women in digital spaces, and thus should not be considered discriminatory.

Ms Grover said her own experience of sexual abuse and trauma recovery underscored for her the importance of female-only support environments and led directly to the app’s creation.

“These are not abstract concerns,” she says in her appeal submission, obtained by The Australian. “They represent real, lived disadvantage occasioned by female biological or physiological differences.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109283

File: e86d077f6d23f14⋯.jpg (57.62 KB,1280x720,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 92129e05b28ee6b⋯.jpg (286.17 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: d038a2c2c785588⋯.jpg (359.86 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23299504 (091052ZJUL25) Notable: USS America and other foreign battle ships head to town ahead of Exercise Talisman Sabre 2025 – The USS America, one of the US Navy’s largest amphibious assault ships, has arrived in Queensland ahead of Talisman Sabre 2025, the region’s largest multinational training exercise. More than 30,000 personnel from 23 nations will take part across Australia and Papua New Guinea. The vessel, carrying F-35B fighters, Ospreys and 3000 Marines, is joined by other ships including HMAS Farncomb and South Korea’s ROKS Marado and Wang Geon. This will be the 11th Talisman Sabre, marking its evolution from a bilateral drill into the southern hemisphere’s biggest war games.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>73659 (pb)

>>109224

USS America and other foreign battle ships head to town ahead of Exercise Talisman Sabre 2025

One of the US Navy’s largest amphibious assault ships has been spotted off the coast of Queensland on Wednesday afternoon, ahead of the start of the Exercise Talisman Sabre.

Jodie Munro O'Brien - July 9, 2025

1/2

One of the US Navy’s largest amphibious assault ships has been spotted off the coast of Queensland during what is likely its final visit to Australia.

The USS America has been carrying out training drills off the coast of Shoalwater Bay, outside of Rockhampton in Central Queensland for the past week, ahead of the start of Exercise Talisman Sabre 2025 on Sunday.

Sunshine Coast based photographer Doug Bazley of Bluey’s Photography, spotted the flagship of the US Seventh Fleet’s America Strike Group off the coast of Caloundra just after midday Wednesday on its way into Brisbane.

“It’s always exciting to see the Navy, whether it be American or Australian,” he said.

“It’s always a thrill to see an aircraft carrier, you could see all the choppers and aircraft on board.

“Everybody is always so excited to see them come past, it’s a spectacle because they’re so close here at Caloundra.

“We don’t see them often, so it always gets people out on the balcony or footpath snapping at them.”

More than 30,000 military personnel from a record 23 countries – including observer nations – are expected to take part in TS25 which is scheduled to be held throughout Queensland, parts of Australia and – for the first time – in Papua New Guinea, from July 13 to August 4.

It is the third time in six years the USS America, which carries fighter jets and tiltrotor aircraft such as MV22-Ospreys, has visited Queensland for Talisman Sabre.

The crew of about 3000 US sailors and Marines, from the 31st Marine Expeditionary Unit, were not permitted to leave the ship during its first visit to the Sunshine State in 2021 due to the then-ongoing Covid-19 pandemic restrictions.

The 257m-long landing helicopter assault (LHA 6)-class vessel, is designed to accommodate the F-35B Lightning II Joint Strike Fighters – or stealth multirole combat jets – as well as a combination of rescue, combat and support helicopters including MV22 Ospreys, CH-53E Super Stallions, AH-1Z Super Cobra and UH-1Y Venom aircraft.

A detachment from the Marine Fighter Attack Squadron (VMFA) 242 is also on board.

The USS America, along with the USS Rushmore and USS Sand Diego, stopped into Sydney for a port visit in June.

The lead ship of the Seventh Fleet’s Amphibious Ready Group has been operating mostly off the coast of Queensland since leaving Sydney.

Based in Sasebo, Japan since 2019, the USS America is scheduled to return to the US, to Naval Base San Diego in California.

Its replacement in Japan, the USS Tripoli, arrived in Sasebo in late June.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109284

File: 3fa7a1ff0e22301⋯.jpg (212.11 KB,750x1080,25:36,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 2448dc00300f417⋯.mp4 (8.24 MB,360x640,9:16,Clipboard.mp4)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23299531 (091107ZJUL25) Notable: Talisman Sabre Tweet: (Video) Countdown is on! Less than one week ‘til Talisman Sabre 2025 - #TS25 #TalismanSabre2025 #YourADF

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109224

Talisman Sabre Tweet

Countdown is on!

Less than one week ‘til Talisman Sabre 2025.

#TS25 #TalismanSabre2025 #YourADF

https://x.com/TalismanSabre/status/1942746555762565306

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109285

File: 198ca5f135e2c31⋯.jpg (236.55 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: a45f9d6eee2fdcb⋯.jpg (183.53 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23304704 (101055ZJUL25) Notable: Trump serves Australia $3bn dose of bad medicine – Donald Trump’s threat of 200% tariffs on pharmaceuticals has triggered alarm in Canberra and business circles, with Barclays estimating a $2.8bn hit to Australia’s economy. Treasurer Jim Chalmers insisted the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS) “is not on the table” for trade talks, calling it “a fundamental part of healthcare in Australia.” But CSL chairman Brian McNamee urged the Albanese government to make the PBS more efficient and allow innovative American drugs into Australia faster, saying the nation benefits as much from US innovation in medicines as it does from the protection the nation gets from the Pentagon’s defence spending in the Indo-Pacific.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109274

>>109278

>>109280

Trump serves Australia $3bn dose of bad medicine

MATTHEW CRANSTON - 9 July 2025

1/2

Donald Trump’s move to ramp up tariffs on medicines and copper has sparked alarm among government and business leaders, amid fears the US President’s latest trade war will smash the local drug industry, stripping nearly $3bn from the economy.

But the chairman of the country’s biggest drugs manufacturer says the White House’s concerns over the nation’s Pharmaceuticals Benefits Scheme are not ­unreasonable and the Albanese government has room to negotiate with Mr Trump.

Mr Trump warned on Wednesday (AEST) there would be no more extensions on tariffs past a new August 1 deadline as he ­unveiled a 50 per cent hit on copper imports and threatened a 200 per cent duty on pharmaceuticals after a grace period of a year to 18 months.

Reserve Bank deputy governor Andrew Hauser said staff at the central bank were watching Mr Trump’s tariff manoeuvres like “hawks” and that the effects on Australia could be profound.

“How worried are we about it? We are very, very focused on it. The level of uncertainty is clearly elevated and the implications … for a global trading economy like Australia, of these fundamental changes, are very profound,” he told a conference in Sydney.

Mr Trump’s proposed tariff on pharmaceuticals is estimated by analysts at investment bank ­Barclays to likely cost Australia $2.8bn through both direct impacts on economic activity, ­exports to the US and via intermediate goods exports to countries that use them in production of drugs also hit by the tariffs.

“We’re going to give (drug manufacturers) about a year, a year and a half, to come in, and after that they’re going to be ­tariffed,” Mr Trump said in the Oval Office.

“They’re going to be tariffed at a very, very high rate, like 200 per cent. We’ll give them a certain period of time to get their act together.”

Jim Chalmers expressed alarm, saying the government was urgently seeking further ­details from the US. “These are obviously very concerning developments,” the Treasurer said.

He said Australia’s pharmaceutical sector was “much more exposed” to the US market, but reiterated the government would not sacrifice the nation’s PBS to do a deal with the Trump administration. “We see the PBS as a fundamental part of healthcare in Australia. We’re not willing to compromise the PBS,” Dr ­Chalmers said.

But CSL chairman Brian McNamee urged the Albanese government to make the PBS more efficient and allow innovative American drugs into Australia faster, saying the nation benefits as much from US innovation in medicines as it does from the protection the nation gets from the Pentagon’s defence spending in the Indo-Pacific.

“I don’t think America’s ­demand is an unreasonable ­demand. I don’t think the US is trying to tear the PBS down,” Mr McNamee said.

“Americans have allowed their companies to maximise drug ­innovation and sell to other countries. Other countries benefit from that and are using the free-rider system. I think this is the same as defence.

“I think Australia could accelerate the system for approvals and the mechanism for pricing of ­innovative new drugs, but it does come at a cost. You need to make a contribution.”

The US is Australia’s biggest pharmaceutical export market, accounting for 38 per cent of total Australian pharmaceutical exports. Blood products make up about 90 per cent of the trade.

Australia’s pharmaceutical exports to the US were valued at $2.06bn in 2024, accounting for 9 per cent of the nation’s total goods sold into the American market.

US lobbyists at the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America (PhRMA) have urged Mr Trump to “leverage ongoing trade negotiations” as a tool for reworking the PBS and raising Australian drug prices.

Medicines Australia chief executive Liz de Somer — representing Australia’s pharmaceutical producers — opposed the institution of tariffs and any threat by the Trump administration to the PBS.

An untested executive order by Mr Trump, dubbed the “Most Favoured Nation” order, also leaves open the threat that international producers could hike up Australian prices or pull their products. Under the proposal, the US would refuse to accept medicine prices higher than those overseas, forcing companies to either give Americans their best rate or bring foreign prices in line.

“We don’t want to overreact to the announcement, but being very clear, the industry in Australia opposes tariffs being applied to pharmaceutical manufacturing,” Ms de Somer said.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109286

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23304723 (101111ZJUL25) Notable: Video: Plan to tackle antisemitism: Funding threats for unis, school curriculum changes in bid to change ‘dangerous trajectory’ – Jillian Segal, Australia’s first special envoy on antisemitism, has delivered a landmark plan proposing mandatory Holocaust education, adoption of the International Holocaust Remembrance Association’s definition of antisemitism, stricter oversight of universities and media, and potential funding cuts to institutions, charities or cultural events that fail to act. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese released the report with Segal, pledging swift but balanced implementation and urging bipartisanship. Mainstream Jewish groups welcomed the blueprint, while civil liberties advocates, Palestinian activists and the Jewish Council of Australia warned it risks undermining free speech.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109251

>>109252

>>109272

Plan to tackle antisemitism: Funding threats for unis, school curriculum changes in bid to change ‘dangerous trajectory’

Olivia Ireland and Jessica McSweeney - July 10, 2025

1/2

Universities will be rated on how they have cracked down on anti-Jewish hate, social media sites forced to combat racist trolls and teaching the Holocaust mandated in the national school curriculum under a sweeping blueprint put forward by the country’s first special envoy on antisemitism.

Funding would be stripped from educational institutions, cultural events and charities that fail to address antisemitism if the government agrees to enact the full plan delivered by Jillian Segal to address a series of antisemitic incidents, including arson attacks.

The recommendations would embed a controversial definition of antisemitism in Australian institutions and pose a challenge for the Albanese government, which has promised to protect Jewish Australians while safeguarding free speech.

Segal said antisemitism had become ingrained in academic and cultural institutions and flourished on social media. “We need to resolve this urgently,” Segal said in her report. “We are on a dangerous trajectory where young people raised on a diet of disinformation and misinformation about Jews today risk becoming fully fledged antisemites tomorrow.”

The report, released by Prime Minister Anthony Albanese alongside Segal on Thursday, sparked mixed reactions: praise from mainstream Jewish groups, and concern from legal figures and Palestinian activists who cautioned it could undermine democratic freedoms.

Segal told this masthead that she would be a realist about changes to her recommendations but echoed calls from Albanese for the country to discuss it in good faith.

“The plan has to evolve, it’s ambitious,” Segal said. “This, unfortunately, is no silver bullet, and it needs support rather than people reacting that it’s bad and dangerous.”

Albanese said the government had already implemented some of Segal’s recommendations, would move quickly on others and consider the rest. But he did not specify which recommendations were in which category.

“I don’t want this to be partisan,” Albanese said. “I want everyone to say: ‘yep, might not agree with absolutely everything in here, but it’s something we can work with’.”

The opposition welcomed Segal’s plan and said the government should implement it. “Fighting the tidal wave of antisemitism cannot be left to the envoy alone,” shadow attorney-general Julian Leeser said. “It needs the prime minister’s commitment, not just to hear the envoy’s advocacy, but to action her policies.”

Segal’s report was created in response to a wave of antisemitic incidents in the last year, the latest an alleged arson attack at a Melbourne synagogue last week, similar to a firebombing of a childcare centre daubed with anti-Jewish graffiti in Sydney’s east in January.

It contains calls for more security but focuses on the educational and cultural spheres. Some Jewish students have said they felt unsafe around protest encampments at universities that sprang up after the October 7, 2023 Hamas attacks on Israel and the subsequent bombardment of the Gaza Strip. Attendees have felt similar fears at festivals with pro-Palestinian speakers.

The report says people with antisemitic views should be barred from Australia, and charities that promote antisemitism should be denied the ability to receive tax-deductible gifts.

It also has a recommendation to put Holocaust and antisemitism education in the national school curriculum, and another for the envoy to monitor media organisations “to encourage accurate, fair and responsible reporting.”

It further states the media should be pushed to meet editorial standards, commitment to impartiality and balance, and “to avoid accepting false or distorted narratives”.

Cultural institutions, police, judges and public servants would be educated about antisemitism, and the envoy would push to establish agreed guidelines for festivals and arts organisations to respond to incidents.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109287

File: 8fd87cbb83f4008⋯.jpg (222.2 KB,1299x731,1299:731,Clipboard.jpg)

File: fd680c123a342b1⋯.jpg (407.91 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: fcedfc48ed495a2⋯.jpg (306.73 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 06621b5fc0254b8⋯.jpg (349.02 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23304735 (101135ZJUL25) Notable: Gaza woman living in Sydney detained in pre-dawn raid following ASIO security risk ruling – A 61-year-old grandmother from Gaza, Maha Almassri, was detained in a pre-dawn raid on her Bankstown home after the Australian Security Intelligence Organisation issued an adverse assessment declaring her a security risk. Her bridging visa was cancelled under the Migration Act’s character test, with the decision signed by Assistant Immigration Minister Julian Hill. Ms Almassri was taken to Villawood Immigration Detention Centre, prompting a rally outside Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke’s office. Family members denied she posed any threat, while the government cited national security and refused further comment.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109251

>>109264

Gaza woman living in Sydney detained in pre-dawn raid following ASIO security risk ruling

A rally has sprung up at Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke’s office after the alleged detention of a woman from Gaza living in Sydney.

A 61-year-old grandmother from Gaza has been detained following a pre-dawn raid on her Bankstown home after she was deemed a security risk by ASIO.

Maha Almassri, 61, was taken to Villawood Immigration Detention Centre on Thursday, with a Department of Home Affairs letter seen by The Daily Telegraph stating her bridging visa was cancelled on Wednesday as she had failed the visa’s “character test”.

The document states the department was “provided with an Adverse Security Assessment” by the Australian Security Intelligence Organisation (ASIO), which said the agency “assessed Ms Almassri to be directly or indirectly a risk to security”.

The document said “taking into account the above information”, Ms Almassri “does not pass the character test” – a claim fiercely denied by her family, who launched a snap rally outside Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke’s office where other protesters chanted “death, death to the IDF”.

The same day, the Albanese government’s envoy to combat anti-Semitism released an overarching plan to deal with the issue, including the potential to screen visa applicants for anti-Semitic views and work to ensure the Migration Act “effectively facilitates visa refusals or cancellations for anti-Semitic conduct and rhetoric”.

The reasons for Ms Almassri’s detention are not known and there is no suggestion that she holds anti-Semitic views.

A crowd of about 50 protesters, including Ms Almassri’s daughter Albatoul and four year-old granddaughter Laila, gathered outside Mr Burke’s Punchbowl office hours after the raid with keffiyehs and Palestinian flags, pledging to camp outside until the 61-year-old was freed.

Albatoul, who looked sombre during the protest, said her mother had arrived in Australia in February 2024, after visiting relatives in Saudi Arabia and being denied re-entry to Gaza.

Ms Almassri’s brother-in-law Soliman Almassri said “no explanation” had been given for her detention, that she was “sick” and “traumatised” after a family member was killed and her Gaza home destroyed in the conflict there.

“She’s an old lady, there’s no reason … what threat to security are they talking about,” Mr Almassri said.

Police watched on as community members chanted “Tony Burke, you can’t hide, you’re supporting genocide”, and “Anti-Zionism is not anti-Semitism”.

There’s no suggestion of wrongdoing by family members or supporters who attended the rally.

A spokesman for Mr Burke said, “The government will not be commenting on this cancellation”.

“Any information in the public domain is being supplied by the individual and is not necessarily consistent with the information supplied by our intelligence and security agencies,” he said.

“The Australian government doesn’t stop investigating new information about a visa-holder just because they are onshore.

“Our security checks never stop and this cancellation is proof the system is working.

“There is nothing more important to this government than the safety of the Australian community.”

The documents state the visa cancellation was “personally” decided by Assistant Immigration Minister Julian Hill, who was contacted for comment.

It’s understood the decision to revoke the visa could be judicially reviewed through the federal or high courts.

https://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/news/nsw/gaza-woman-living-in-sydney-detained-in-predawn-raid/news-story/1ec533132bde633052bf59a46d26e5c0

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109288

File: 91db2bb53be0f51⋯.jpg (2.87 MB,5000x3334,2500:1667,Clipboard.jpg)

File: f430c807e85a4c5⋯.jpg (119.9 KB,1080x1616,135:202,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 46f1392cabe6cd5⋯.jpg (408.22 KB,2048x1366,1024:683,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 425a00588833b46⋯.jpg (431.74 KB,2048x1698,1024:849,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23304741 (101146ZJUL25) Notable: Foreign minister promises Asian nations Australia will remain a 'reliable' partner with open markets – Foreign Minister Penny Wong told ASEAN leaders in Kuala Lumpur that Australia would remain a dependable partner with open markets, contrasting Canberra’s approach with the Trump administration’s aid cuts and tariff threats. Wong highlighted Australia’s efforts to fill funding gaps left by Washington and urged support for global rules against coercion. She warned China was pursuing a military build-up and strategic dominance in the South China Sea, stressing the need for a regional balance of power where “no country dominates and no country is dominated.”

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109234

Foreign minister promises Asian nations Australia will remain a 'reliable' partner with open markets

Stephen Dziedzic - 10 July 2025

Foreign Minister Penny Wong has promised South-East Asian nations that Australia will be a "reliable" partner with open markets, as the region grapples with the Trump administration's aid cuts and tariff threats.

Senator Wong also criticised China's aggressive behaviour in the South China Sea and its military build-up, warning the Association of South-East Asian Nations (ASEAN) that Beijing is intent on changing the balance of power in Asia.

Foreign ministers from the ten-member ASEAN have gathered in Kuala Lumpur for an annual meeting, along with top officials from other countries, including US Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov.

The Trump administration has threatened to hit multiple ASEAN countries with heavy tariffs if they don't strike new deals with the US, and anxieties over the economic fallout from the US president's trade agenda look set to dominate many of the discussions.

Senator Wong used a major speech at the conference to urge ASEAN nations to stand up for global rules and against coercion, while burnishing Australia's credentials as a "reliable partner on whom you can count".

The foreign minister did not directly criticise either Mr Trump's trade agenda or his massive cuts to USAID, but said Australia had moved quickly to fill some "unexpected funding gaps" in development in South-East Asia.

"We believe as partners and neighbours that we have a responsibility to contribute to a more equitable future for our region, and it's a responsibility that our government will not abandon," she said.

"And Australia's response to others reducing their funding has been to pivot and re-prioritise, ensuring we respond to the most acute needs."

Senator Wong said while the Trump administration envisaged a "different role" for America in the world, the US's presence in the region remained "critical" to stability.

She did not take aim at Mr Trump's protectionist agenda and trade threats, but drew an implicit contrast with the US by lauding Australia's move to dismantle tariff barriers in the 80s.

"Australia opened our economy to the region and the world long ago … I can assure you today that this will not change," she said.

She also sharply criticised China's massive military build-up and aggressive conduct in the South China Sea, saying Beijing was intent on shifting the balance of power in its favour.

"China continues to assert its strategic influence and project its military power further into our region," she said.

"And we have seen the worrying pace of China's nuclear and conventional military build-up, without the transparency that the region expects.

"We are realistic about China's objectives in changing the regional balance of power — and it is clear in China's public political discourse."

She also stressed that neither the US nor countries across the region sought military confrontation with China, reiterating her call for "a balance of power" in the region, "where no country dominates and no country is dominated".

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-07-10/foreign-minister-penny-wong-asean-comments/105518328

https://x.com/SenatorWong/status/1943169815235182864

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109289

File: 374187764089a93⋯.jpg (421.42 KB,1284x1037,1284:1037,Clipboard.jpg)

File: a336aaebdedc639⋯.jpg (687.2 KB,1227x937,1227:937,Clipboard.jpg)

File: d069501f90cd90c⋯.jpg (193.46 KB,1217x1216,1217:1216,Clipboard.jpg)

File: cea926ecbcf1291⋯.jpg (157.39 KB,901x786,901:786,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 44ff267ee89caa3⋯.jpg (199.99 KB,901x941,901:941,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23309418 (110954ZJUL25) Notable: Bitter Family Battle:What really happened to Virginia Giuffre?- She took on Jeffrey Epstein and Prince Andrew, then died by suicide in April. For the first time, her family share diary entries, private messages and photos that reveal her secret battle with her husband. - On March 30 Virginia Giuffre shared a photo on her Instagram page, showing her bruised and bloodied after a car crash outside her home in Australia. “They’ve given me four days to live,” she wrote of her prognosis. “I’m ready to go.” To the outside world, it appeared to be the latest in a series of tragedies to befall Virginia, who had accused Jeffrey Epstein of sexually trafficking her to his high-profile friends, including Prince Andrew. But her family understood the post for what it was: a desperate and final plea for help. Three weeks later, on April 25, Virginia took her own life, alone on a ranch in remote scrubland north of Perth, aged 41. Virginia’s family said little in the months that followed, even as media speculation and conspiracy theories swirled - that she had made up the crash, that her death had been ordered by influential people trying to silence her. Now, her relatives have decided to speak out in their first interview, to honour what they say were her last wishes. “Her death was a terrible ending to this story, but there is a big part of it she never got to tell,” Amanda Roberts, the wife of Virginia’s younger brother, Sky Roberts, told The Times. That story is one of abuse by those, like Epstein, who trafficked and exploited her. But it is also a story about a bitter battle with the person closest to her: her husband of 22 years and father of her three children, Robert Giuffre.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>73395 (pb)

What really happened to Virginia Giuffre?

She took on Jeffrey Epstein and Prince Andrew, then died by suicide in April. For the first time, her family share diary entries, private messages and photos that reveal her secret battle with her husband

Josie Ensor, The Times - July 1 2025

1/5

On March 30 Virginia Giuffre shared a photo on her Instagram page, showing her bruised and bloodied after a car crash outside her home in Australia.

“They’ve given me four days to live,” she wrote of her prognosis. “I’m ready to go.”

To the outside world, it appeared to be the latest in a series of tragedies to befall Virginia, who had accused Jeffrey Epstein of sexually trafficking her to his high-profile friends, including Prince Andrew.

But her family understood the post for what it was: a desperate and final plea for help.

Three weeks later, on April 25, Virginia took her own life, alone on a ranch in remote scrubland north of Perth, aged 41.

Virginia’s family said little in the months that followed, even as media speculation and conspiracy theories swirled — that she had made up the crash, that her death had been ordered by influential people trying to silence her. Now, her relatives have decided to speak out in their first interview, to honour what they say were her last wishes.

“Her death was a terrible ending to this story, but there is a big part of it she never got to tell,” Amanda Roberts, the wife of Virginia’s younger brother, Sky Roberts, told The Times.

That story is one of abuse by those, like Epstein, who trafficked and exploited her. But it is also a story about a bitter battle with the person closest to her: her husband of 22 years and father of her three children, Robert Giuffre.

Amanda, using a nickname for Virginia, said: “Jenna may have fought battles with some of the most powerful men in the world, like Epstein and Prince Andrew, but what people didn’t understand was that [in her final days] the hardest battle of her life was at home.”

For the first time, Virginia’s family is sharing a diary she kept from the beginning of this year, in which she shares her memories of her marriage as it was breaking down, as well as photos, text messages and legal filings, in which she alleges that Robert was violent, abusive and “emotionally and physically controlling”.

Virginia claimed in her diary that her husband’s behaviour worsened as she became the face of the campaign to bring Epstein and others to justice. “The stronger I became, the scarier he became,” she wrote, accusing him of trying to stop her from “advocating for the victims of trafficking” and, in the final months, allegedly preventing her from seeing her children.

“What you have to know about Jenna is she was never afraid of any of these people,” Sky said. “She was ready to move on with her life, but she wanted that life to be with her kids.”

When contacted for comment, Robert’s attorney said that “the passing of the wife of Robert Giuffre and mother of their children is tragic”. But his counsel was unable to comment on specific allegations of abuse due to live proceedings in the Western Australia courts.

Meeting Robert

Born Virginia Lee Roberts, she experienced abuse at a young age when a family friend molested her aged seven.

She was spotted one day by Epstein’s girlfriend Ghislaine Maxwell while working a summer job, aged 15, at Donald Trump’s Mar-a-Lago resort in Palm Beach.

Virginia described how she was “passed around like a platter of fruit” among the Epstein and Maxwell’s friends until she managed to escape, aged 19.

An aspiring masseuse, she had been sent by Epstein to Thailand for a course at the International Training Massage School. It was there, in 2002, that she met Robert, a 26-year-old mixed martial arts (MMA) instructor from Australia.

Instead of returning to Epstein in New York, as she had promised, she ran away with Robert and they were married ten days later.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109290

File: 902fe35ed6b0581⋯.jpg (297.27 KB,1103x1389,1103:1389,Clipboard.jpg)

File: f2c137622bec0ce⋯.png (13.59 KB,1328x634,664:317,Clipboard.png)

File: 387b10966aef841⋯.jpg (160.7 KB,1602x1704,267:284,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 28c7ad8b0660e63⋯.jpg (356.7 KB,2036x1357,2036:1357,Clipboard.jpg)

File: d37923321b5c9db⋯.jpg (178.92 KB,1046x908,523:454,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23309419 (110956ZJUL25) Notable: Bitter Family Battle:What really happened to Virginia Giuffre?- She took on Jeffrey Epstein and Prince Andrew, then died by suicide in April. For the first time, her family share diary entries, private messages and photos that reveal her secret battle with her husband. - On March 30 Virginia Giuffre shared a photo on her Instagram page, showing her bruised and bloodied after a car crash outside her home in Australia. “They’ve given me four days to live,” she wrote of her prognosis. “I’m ready to go.” To the outside world, it appeared to be the latest in a series of tragedies to befall Virginia, who had accused Jeffrey Epstein of sexually trafficking her to his high-profile friends, including Prince Andrew. But her family understood the post for what it was: a desperate and final plea for help. Three weeks later, on April 25, Virginia took her own life, alone on a ranch in remote scrubland north of Perth, aged 41. Virginia’s family said little in the months that followed, even as media speculation and conspiracy theories swirled - that she had made up the crash, that her death had been ordered by influential people trying to silence her. Now, her relatives have decided to speak out in their first interview, to honour what they say were her last wishes. “Her death was a terrible ending to this story, but there is a big part of it she never got to tell,” Amanda Roberts, the wife of Virginia’s younger brother, Sky Roberts, told The Times. That story is one of abuse by those, like Epstein, who trafficked and exploited her. But it is also a story about a bitter battle with the person closest to her: her husband of 22 years and father of her three children, Robert Giuffre.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109289

2/5

‘On the surface everything looked okay’

The couple welcomed their first child, Christian, in 2006. Noah arrived in spring the following year.

Virginia stayed at home to raise the children. Robert had odd jobs in construction. For years she was afraid to talk about her time with Epstein, even with her own family — until he was convicted for the sex trafficking of a minor in Florida in 2008.

One year later, Virginia sued Epstein — identifying herself only as Jane Doe 102 — accusing the financier of trafficking her between his homes in Palm Beach, New York and the US Virgin Islands.

She decided to waive her anonymity after the birth of her daughter Emily the following year and gave interviews about exactly what went on, turning what had been a local story into international news. Dini von Mueffling, Virginia’s public representative, told The Times: “Holding Emily as a newborn, she said to herself, ‘I need to do better for my daughter and for all the women out there who can’t fight’.”

The earliest alleged incident of domestic violence dates to that time. There is no record of a complaint by Virginia at the time.

In a text Virginia sent to von Mueffling in April this year, she alleged that:

Even when I had Emily in my arms as a baby, Rob was coming down off a 3-day bender and punched me in the face which dropped me to the floor and continuously kicking me in the stomach.

The couple spent those early years between Cairns — the northeast tip of Australia where Robert had grown up — and Colorado in the US, near Sky, 36, and Virginia’s half-brother, Danny Wilson, 46.

They stayed for a month in 2013 with Danny and his wife, Lanette. Danny claimed Robert was “volatile” and “erratic” during that visit, alleging Robert would start drinking on their porch each morning before they went to work. “Anything would set him off,” Danny alleged.

Sky and Amanda said they had always thought of Robert as “controlling” and short-tempered, but Virginia had not mentioned any physical abuse at the time. If she was ever having a bad day, she would say, “Oh, you know Robbie”, Sky said. When pressed about what exactly she meant, Virginia never offered anything more.

Two years later, Robert was arrested in Colorado for an alleged assault on Virginia that the couple kept private. The Times has seen a police record filed in Fremont County on June 3, 2015, against Robert, labelled with the case type “domestic violence”.

The criminal docket is sealed, but according to a civil lawsuit Virginia filed against Maxwell that same year, the couple “became involved in an argument over the welfare of the family dog … [Virginia] alleges she was assaulted by her husband as witnessed by at least one of their children”. According to the filing, Robert pleaded guilty to domestic violence and was placed on probation.

Public v private fight

In 2017 the family moved from the US back to Cairns, where they remained for three years before relocating to Perth. Virginia alleged in her journal, written this year, that Robert stopped working that year and had taken to drinking most days “from 8am to sometime in the pm”.

She claimed in her diary that he was drinking, and alleged that he had become violent when “consumed by jealousy”.

At the same time, Virginia’s lawyers filed another suit in Florida, claiming that Epstein had trafficked her to Prince Andrew.

She accused Epstein and Maxwell of forcing her to have sex with Andrew on at least three occasions in the early 2000s. He denied the allegations.

In November 2019, Andrew gave an interview to the BBC’s Emily Maitlis about his relationship to Epstein that was widely considered a PR disaster. What had been tabloid fodder mutated into a full-blown scandal, forcing the duke to step down from public duties.

Virginia, a 35-year-old sex-trafficking victim from Loxahatchee — a down-at-heel town in Florida which her brothers describe as “a place no one has heard of” — had toppled the Queen of England’s favourite son. Her family said she had always been “incredibly proud of herself” for that.

“When people told her ‘no’, or people told her they wouldn’t believe her, or that she was crazy, she would say ‘Watch me’,” Amanda said.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109291

File: be738133e203aa7⋯.png (31.92 KB,1328x786,664:393,Clipboard.png)

File: 6c38f58a4956b2f⋯.jpg (172.76 KB,1200x1599,400:533,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 98ae2711436efb1⋯.jpg (55.1 KB,634x793,634:793,Clipboard.jpg)

File: f8572837066e2e5⋯.jpg (57.3 KB,634x795,634:795,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 29eee17d3ae8a27⋯.jpg (330.63 KB,1064x1419,1064:1419,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23309420 (110957ZJUL25) Notable: Bitter Family Battle:What really happened to Virginia Giuffre?- She took on Jeffrey Epstein and Prince Andrew, then died by suicide in April. For the first time, her family share diary entries, private messages and photos that reveal her secret battle with her husband. - On March 30 Virginia Giuffre shared a photo on her Instagram page, showing her bruised and bloodied after a car crash outside her home in Australia. “They’ve given me four days to live,” she wrote of her prognosis. “I’m ready to go.” To the outside world, it appeared to be the latest in a series of tragedies to befall Virginia, who had accused Jeffrey Epstein of sexually trafficking her to his high-profile friends, including Prince Andrew. But her family understood the post for what it was: a desperate and final plea for help. Three weeks later, on April 25, Virginia took her own life, alone on a ranch in remote scrubland north of Perth, aged 41. Virginia’s family said little in the months that followed, even as media speculation and conspiracy theories swirled - that she had made up the crash, that her death had been ordered by influential people trying to silence her. Now, her relatives have decided to speak out in their first interview, to honour what they say were her last wishes. “Her death was a terrible ending to this story, but there is a big part of it she never got to tell,” Amanda Roberts, the wife of Virginia’s younger brother, Sky Roberts, told The Times. That story is one of abuse by those, like Epstein, who trafficked and exploited her. But it is also a story about a bitter battle with the person closest to her: her husband of 22 years and father of her three children, Robert Giuffre.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109290

3/5

Back in Australia, meanwhile, Virginia claimed in her diary kept in her last months that her husband grew uncomfortable with the publicity her case was attracting.

“During this time, the world was getting to know Virginia,” Amanda said during a family trip to New York last month.

“She’s going public, filing lawsuits and I guess she sort of had to put on a face. She had become a spokesperson against sex trafficking and she was able to build that fight for all the other victims, but she wasn’t able to do that battle and the one at home at the same time.”

She was awarded millions of dollars over the years from settlement funds and civil lawsuits against Maxwell, the Epstein estate, Prince Andrew and the bank JP Morgan over its handling of Epstein’s finances. She received $10 million from the duke in 2022, and Queen Elizabeth is believed to have donated £2 million ($2.7 million) to Speak Out, Act, Reclaim (Soar), a charity Virginia had set up to campaign for survivors of sexual abuse.

Virginia alleged in her recent diary that Robert was no longer working and was “gambling away” their money “carelessly”.

The incident

Virginia’s family said she first broached the subject of divorce with Robert in August 2023. “We talked so many times about her leaving. She talked to us for years about being unhappy in their relationship,” Lanette said. “She told me, ‘I don’t love him any more’.”

The couple remained legally married but became estranged in 2024, living in separate houses. Virginia lived at the ranch in a town called Neergabby with her full-time carer, Cheryl, whom she had hired to help after suffering a debilitating back injury. Robert remained at the “marital home” in Ocean Reef 30 miles away.

Everything changed after an incident on January 9 this year, which Virginia and Robert have characterised very differently.

They had reunited at a rental house along the western Australian coast for their daughter Emily’s 15th birthday.

Over a FaceTime call the next day, Virginia told Sky and Amanda her account of the incident. According to Sky, Robert went into Virginia’s room and asked her for sex. When she told him no, Robert allegedly “started to call her names and got aggressive”. Sky said Virginia claimed he “punched her over and over”.

Sky claims said the incident aggravated existing injuries to her sternum and spine, which she had undergone extensive surgery to treat in 2023.

Sky shared a text Virginia sent her mother on January 10:

Fri, Jan10 at 5:55 AM

Mommy, pls call me when you're awake. Rob did it again, I'm in the hospital and I need your voice to help me calm down.

Fri, Jan10 at 10:21 AM

Trying to call please call me back when you can please love you honey love mom

In the days after the alleged assault, while Virginia was recovering at Royal Perth Hospital, she and Cheryl took photos of her injuries. They appear to show Virginia with a black eye and her face and chest bruised.

Both sides reported the incident to police in Western Australia. An investigator from the family violence investigation squad in Perth confirmed they had looked into the claims and that they had not charged either with any crime.

Robert filed a restraining order application against Virginia at the magistrates’ court while she was in hospital.

According to his account, he and Virginia had been talking and “the conversation led to an argument and then she started physically assaulting me with headbutts, punching and spitting. I was trying to protect myself by covering my face and as soon as I had the chance to flee I did.”

He alleged that she caused herself the injuries and that she was, and had been, mentally unstable.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109292

File: 08c9aaf8fb6ab0f⋯.jpg (174.71 KB,1076x847,1076:847,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 7a43422b0895927⋯.jpg (220.7 KB,1002x1000,501:500,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 9870ed1282a3584⋯.jpg (449.73 KB,2001x1334,3:2,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 6897c28f94c076e⋯.jpg (117.42 KB,802x1188,401:594,Clipboard.jpg)

File: a72a26b237c1a15⋯.jpg (99.83 KB,1080x608,135:76,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23309423 (110959ZJUL25) Notable: Bitter Family Battle:What really happened to Virginia Giuffre?- She took on Jeffrey Epstein and Prince Andrew, then died by suicide in April. For the first time, her family share diary entries, private messages and photos that reveal her secret battle with her husband. - On March 30 Virginia Giuffre shared a photo on her Instagram page, showing her bruised and bloodied after a car crash outside her home in Australia. “They’ve given me four days to live,” she wrote of her prognosis. “I’m ready to go.” To the outside world, it appeared to be the latest in a series of tragedies to befall Virginia, who had accused Jeffrey Epstein of sexually trafficking her to his high-profile friends, including Prince Andrew. But her family understood the post for what it was: a desperate and final plea for help. Three weeks later, on April 25, Virginia took her own life, alone on a ranch in remote scrubland north of Perth, aged 41. Virginia’s family said little in the months that followed, even as media speculation and conspiracy theories swirled - that she had made up the crash, that her death had been ordered by influential people trying to silence her. Now, her relatives have decided to speak out in their first interview, to honour what they say were her last wishes. “Her death was a terrible ending to this story, but there is a big part of it she never got to tell,” Amanda Roberts, the wife of Virginia’s younger brother, Sky Roberts, told The Times. That story is one of abuse by those, like Epstein, who trafficked and exploited her. But it is also a story about a bitter battle with the person closest to her: her husband of 22 years and father of her three children, Robert Giuffre.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109291

4/5

In handwritten notes in the affidavit, he claimed that he was left with “scratches and bruising to head” and that he was “fearful my spouse will once again come assault and harass myself and my kids”.

He filed for temporary custody of their younger children — Noah, who was months away from turning 18, and Emily — which he was granted. Virginia was prohibited from seeing or contacting them for six months, in a decision that came as a shock to her and her family in the US.

During her FaceTime call with Sky, Virginia “opened up” about her alleged abuse, which she claimed had been taking place for some time.

“She’d gone through rough patches growing up and she would always protect me from all that stuff,” Sky said. “She played that protector role later in life too, but at this point it was beyond that.”

‘Mommy still loves you’

That night at the rental house was the last time Virginia saw her children.

Over the next two months, she tried to reach out to Emily. “She had sent Emily a link to a song they liked,” Sky said. She changed the names of the family’s shared Netflix and Amazon accounts to “Mommy still loves you” and “Mommy is here”, Sky said, in the hope the children would see the messages.

The family said they saw Virginia’s cryptic Instagram post on March 30 as “a way to reach her children” and “a desperate plea for help”.

The post was met with questions about Virginia’s reliability, whether she did — as she claimed — have four days to live, and whether the crash had even happened. “I reviewed the damage to [Virginia’s] car just because I’m an insurance adjuster myself and I was curious. It was very much damaged,” said Sky, who travelled to Australia to be with Virginia, concerned about her wellbeing:

“There are a very small number of people that know the overall scope of what happened,” Sky said. “You have people coming out, including my own dad, saying somebody did this to her. It’s insulting to me.”

The final days

“I've never seen my sister as physically broken down as she was then,” Sky said of the final three weeks they spent together. “She was really struggling, emotionally and physically. She could face a lot of things, but the idea of not seeing her children broke her.”

Despite that, Sky said he and Virginia had had “such a good day” the day before she took her life. “We had lunch and after that we tried on cowboy hats and went to a thrift store. We were just being silly, you know — she could be very silly.”

That night they went to bed and everything seemed normal, Sky said. The next day, he went to check on her. Hearing the sound of what he described as “meditation music” through her bedroom door, he decided to give her some space and left the house.

He called Cheryl to check she was with his sister, but she informed him that Virginia had told her to take the day off as it was Anzac Day, a national day of remembrance in Australia.

“We have always had this interconnected, twinsie thing and I just felt something was wrong,” Sky said, sobbing. He said he drove back to the house at about 8pm and knocked on her door. When Virginia did not answer, Sky tried to open it but found it locked.

He broke the door down and found her unconscious. He attempted resuscitation for 45 minutes before paramedics arrived and declared her dead. Her brother did not wish to go into detail on the manner of her death.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109293

File: 30d4707b80e6667⋯.jpg (387.53 KB,1170x1495,18:23,Clipboard.jpg)

File: ed58d0c0c5a3c90⋯.jpg (173.15 KB,852x376,213:94,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 4a7ac66d74092c2⋯.jpg (335.55 KB,825x674,825:674,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 53a9f784f5bd311⋯.jpg (322.52 KB,852x725,852:725,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 39080d3dedeac84⋯.jpg (95.21 KB,962x640,481:320,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23309425 (111000ZJUL25) Notable: Bitter Family Battle:What really happened to Virginia Giuffre?- She took on Jeffrey Epstein and Prince Andrew, then died by suicide in April. For the first time, her family share diary entries, private messages and photos that reveal her secret battle with her husband. - On March 30 Virginia Giuffre shared a photo on her Instagram page, showing her bruised and bloodied after a car crash outside her home in Australia. “They’ve given me four days to live,” she wrote of her prognosis. “I’m ready to go.” To the outside world, it appeared to be the latest in a series of tragedies to befall Virginia, who had accused Jeffrey Epstein of sexually trafficking her to his high-profile friends, including Prince Andrew. But her family understood the post for what it was: a desperate and final plea for help. Three weeks later, on April 25, Virginia took her own life, alone on a ranch in remote scrubland north of Perth, aged 41. Virginia’s family said little in the months that followed, even as media speculation and conspiracy theories swirled - that she had made up the crash, that her death had been ordered by influential people trying to silence her. Now, her relatives have decided to speak out in their first interview, to honour what they say were her last wishes. “Her death was a terrible ending to this story, but there is a big part of it she never got to tell,” Amanda Roberts, the wife of Virginia’s younger brother, Sky Roberts, told The Times. That story is one of abuse by those, like Epstein, who trafficked and exploited her. But it is also a story about a bitter battle with the person closest to her: her husband of 22 years and father of her three children, Robert Giuffre.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109292

5/5

Von Mueffling, who was keen to dispel any conspiracy theories that there may have been foul play, said: “She confided in me [in the weeks before her death] that she had planned to commit suicide, down to the method.” Von Mueffling counselled her against it and urged the brothers to go and be with her in Perth. “She was very clear that the pain was just too deep, she just couldn’t take it any more. It wasn’t a dramatic conversation, it was very matter of fact.”

Sky does not know why his sister picked that day, though Amanda believes she felt safe knowing her brother — one of the few men she ever really trusted — was there.

“It was a lot of things,” he said. “It was about to be Noah’s 18th birthday. That was very important to her and she knew she wouldn’t be there for that. They were her life.”

Because he remained her next of kin, Virginia’s body was released to Robert, who held a small private service for her in Perth. Her family said they were not invited.

In the months since, Amanda and Sky have taken up Virginia’s mantel with the charity Soar, campaigning across the US to help pass legislation to help protect the victims of abuse.

The pair and Danny got matching tattoos to remember their sister, or “Sissy”.

“I didn’t want this to end this way,” Sky said. “I didn’t want to have this big battle openly.

“But as a culture we are so quick to dismiss women experiencing violence, and we’ve got to stop doing that.”

https://www.thetimes.com/us/news-today/article/what-happened-virginia-giuffre-husband-family-epstein-zr2cxwrlh

https://archive.vn/TAJYH

https://www.instagram.com/virginiarobertsrising11/p/DH0vvDKzDvu/

https://x.com/Josiensor/status/1940392315388088416

https://x.com/JayShams/status/1940096033494647156

Q Post #4923

Oct 21 2020 20:55:05 (EST)

https://twitter.com/VRSVirginia/status/1319071346282778624

Dearest Virginia -

We stand with you.

Now and always.

Find peace through prayer.

Never give up the good fight.

God bless you.

Q

https://qanon.pub/#4923

https://qanon.pub/#4568

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109294

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23314308 (120823ZJUL25) Notable: Video: Donald Trump nominates Sydney-born influencer Nick Adams as US ambassador to Malaysia – Sydney-born former Liberal councillor Nick Adams, once suspended for verbally abusing a journalist, has been nominated by US President Donald Trump as ambassador to Malaysia. Adams, 40, migrated to America and rebranded as a MAGA-aligned influencer, founding a conservative youth group and self-styling as an “alpha male” and Hooters enthusiast. Trump praised him as “an incredible patriot.” Adams’s bombastic persona and lack of diplomatic experience have raised concerns, with analysts warning his appointment could damage already strained US–Malaysia relations. The role requires Senate confirmation. Adams called the nomination “the honour of a lifetime,” citing his “unending love affair” with the United States.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Donald Trump nominates Sydney-born influencer Nick Adams as US ambassador to Malaysia

Brad Ryan and Phoebe Hosier - 11 July 2025

A Sydney councillor-turned-MAGA-influencer, who faced suspension from the Liberal Party after swearing at a TV journalist, has won Donald Trump's nomination to become US ambassador to Malaysia.

Nick Adams made headlines as a young deputy mayor on Sydney's Ashfield council with a proposal to eradicate the area's pigeons to prevent the spread of bird flu.

The party decided to suspend him after he was filmed verbally abusing a Channel Ten reporter covering his repeated absences from council meetings in 2009.

Mr Adams reportedly later said he quit before he was suspended.

More than 15 years later, now aged 40, he is an American citizen and MAGA commentator, self-branded as a Hooters-loving "alpha male" and "cultural thought leader".

Mr Trump described him as "an incredible patriot and very successful entrepreneur" who had "made it his life's mission to extol the virtues of American greatness".

After moving to the US, Mr Adams set up the Foundation for Liberty and American Greatness, a non-profit dedicated to instilling conservative values in children.

He advocates "patriotic boycotts" to punish the promotion of progressive values, with targets including Disney, Nike, the NBA, "feminist M&Ms" and "woke jezebel" Taylor Swift.

His X feed — where earnest passion can be difficult to distinguish from tongue-in-cheek trolling — is stacked with praise for Mr Trump, who Mr Adams describes as his favourite person.

Other posts list his "girlfriend material" preferences, including "does not interrupt me, ever" and "understands and supports my alpha male way of life".

Multiple tweets mention his love of diner chain Hooters, sometimes referred to as a "breastaurant" because of its shameless practice of hiring busty waitresses and dressing them in snug shirts and short shorts.

In a post on Substack after his nomination, Mr Adams wrote:

"Much of my adult life has been a story of giving back to the United States, the country I loved, the country that welcomed me first as a visitor, then as an entrepreneur, then as a citizen, and today, as an ambassador.

"…Throughout my adult life, I have written books detailing my unending love affair with the United States, her Constitution, flag, people, and history.

"Now, the greatest president of all time, Donald J Trump, has bestowed upon me the honour of a lifetime."

Mr Adams was elected as a Liberal councillor in Ashfield in 2004, aged 19, and became deputy mayor the following year.

After media reports highlighted his numerous absences from council meetings, he was filmed verbally abusing Channel Ten journalist Brett Mason in 2009.

The party decided to suspend him for six months. Then-state director Mark Neeham said his actions fell "well below the standard expected of Liberal Party-endorsed councillors", according to a report in local newspaper City Hub.

Mr Adams, a media and communications graduate from the University of Sydney, also ran his own PR agency.

In 2010, he was featured on the ABC's Media Watch program for his involvement in a publicity stunt where models were apparently paid to pose as protesters calling for Halloween to become a public holiday.

Mr Adams's appointment to the ambassador role requires confirmation by the US Senate.

'Probably will not go down well'

The US and Malaysia have strained relations, in part due to America's support for Israel's war on Gaza, Mr Trump's tariffs and Malaysia's tightening ties with China.

"So the entire relationship is in a pretty negative state before we get to the question of who's the ambassador," said Joshua Kurlantzick, a South-East Asia expert at the Council on Foreign Relations.

He said appointing an ambassador with so little experience would be seen as a "slap in the face to Malaysia", and Mr Adams's "bombastic" nature might not be a good fit for the region's style of diplomacy.

"South-East Asian states, with the exception of the Philippines maybe, prefer to work out diplomatic matters … in as quiet and subtle a way as possible," he said.

"It's potentially a problematic appointment. It shows that Trump doesn't value the foreign service … it probably will not go down well in Malaysia."

Mr Adams won the praise of the president during his first term.

In 2017, Mr Trump tweeted an endorsement of Mr Adams's book about his struggles migrating to the US, and later appointed him to the Woodrow Wilson Center think tank.

The ABC has attempted to contact Mr Adams for comment.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-07-11/donald-trump-nick-adams-malaysia-ambassador/105519888

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HhMqcAOYo9U

https://x.com/NickAdamsinUSA/status/1943268508630184088

https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/114831088465448187

https://x.com/realDonaldTrump/status/837633820417482754

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109295

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23314324 (120837ZJUL25) Notable: Video: The remarkable rise of an Australian deputy mayor to a plum Trump job – US President Donald Trump has nominated Sydney-born Nick Adams, a self-styled “Alpha Male” and conservative pundit, as ambassador to Malaysia, praising his “love of, and devotion to, our Great Country.” Adams, 40, became Australia’s youngest deputy mayor in Ashfield before resigning from the Liberal Party in 2009 after abusing a journalist. He later moved to the US, joined the conservative speaking circuit and built a profile on Fox News as an outspoken Trump supporter. Naturalised in 2021, Adams wrote several books extolling “American greatness” and became a Trump campaign surrogate. Critics note his lack of diplomatic experience and history of Islamophobic remarks.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109294

The remarkable rise of an Australian deputy mayor to a plum Trump job

Josefine Ganko - July 11, 2025

US President Donald Trump has heaped praise on Sydney-born self-described “Alpha Male” Nick Adams, lauding his “love of, and devotion to, our Great Country” as he confirmed his appointment as US ambassador to Malaysia.

The appointment caps the remarkable rise of the University of Sydney graduate who, at 21, became the youngest deputy mayor in Australian history, before moving to the US, where he rose to prominence as a conservative commentator, author and one of Trump’s most loyal and outspoken supporters.

After the ambassadorial appointment was sent to the Senate for confirmation on Wednesday, Trump personally announced his nomination in a post to Truth Social, writing that Adams was an “incredible patriot” and “very successful entrepreneur”.

“Nick graduated from the University of Sydney and, since then, has made it his life’s mission to extol the Virtues of American Greatness. Congratulations Nick!” the post read.

Adams’ effusive support of Trump on X, and in his regular appearances on Fox News shows, drew the president’s attention, with his ascendance making him the latest conservative pundit without relevant experience to be given a role in the Trump administration.

The New York Times has reported that Adams has a history of making Islamophobic remarks, including denigrating Trump’s rivals as supporters of Islam and speaking out against purported efforts to “teach Islam in schools”. Malaysia is a Muslim-majority country.

Born Nicholas Adamopoulos in Sydney in 1984, Adams has written that he battled a neuroblastoma in his childhood, undergoing extensive cancer treatment. In his books, he describes his father as the “ultimate alpha male”, recounting how he never said “I love you” and crediting him with pushing his son to achieve greatness.

He attended Trinity Grammar School, in Sydney’s inner west, before gaining a bachelor of media and communications from the University of Sydney.

Adams’ first foray into politics came when he was elected to Ashfield Council in 2004 on the Liberal Party ticket, before being appointed Australia’s youngest deputy mayor the following year.

His five years on the council were marked by outlandish stories, like his campaign to stop the removal of a portrait of the Queen from the council’s chambers, and a proposal to cull all the pigeons in Ashfield to prevent the spread of avian flu.

“Ashfield should be inhospitable to pigeons,” he said at a council meeting.

“I’m not an expert. I’m not an accountant. I’m certainly not a pest controller. Don’t ask me about procedure. What I would like to see is no pigeons in our area.”

He was censured by his fellow councillors in 2006 for spending thousands of dollars of council funds on personal phone calls and Cabcharges, the Inner West Weekly reported. Adams later repaid the council more than $4000.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109296

File: 2c4c7afe560c59d⋯.jpg (219.56 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: e882a6281d46bc7⋯.jpg (233.22 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23314345 (120851ZJUL25) Notable: Anthony Albanese takes strong stand on anti-Semitism ‘but attacks must stop’ – Prime Minister Anthony Albanese backed envoy Jillian Segal’s anti-Semitism plan, vowing to strip funding from universities, festivals and institutions that fail to act, train border officials to screen anti-Semites, and enforce a nationwide definition of anti-Jewish hate. Albanese declared anti-Semitism “an evil scourge,” condemning recent violence while maintaining criticism of Israel’s actions in Gaza. Jewish leaders, including Israel’s ambassador Amir Maimon, Alex Ryvchin of the Executive Council of Australian Jewry and Alon Cassuto of the Zionist Federation of Australia, praised the plan but demanded swift implementation. Opposition spokesman Julian Leeser warned Albanese would be judged on results, not rhetoric, while legal and community groups urged full adoption.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109251

>>109286

Anthony Albanese takes strong stand on anti-Semitism ‘but attacks must stop’

RICHARD FERGUSON - July 10, 2025

1/2

Jewish leaders are warning ­Anthony Albanese that his landmark plan to fight anti-Semitism will be judged on how fast he can implement it and how hard he can crush anti-Jewish bigotry, as they declare the Prime Minister and Labor have finally shown “they get it”.

The Prime Minister’s hand-picked envoy on anti-Semitism, Jillian Segal, was flanked by Mr ­Albanese and Home Affairs ­Minister Tony Burke on Thursday as she unveiled a strategy that promises to bring universities, arts bodies, and public broadcasters into line if they allow anti-Jewish hate to continue to foment.

The Segal plan would strip funding from universities and arts festivals that fail to stop anti-Semitism, train border force officials how to screen anti-Semites trying to enter Australia, and implement a nationwide definition of anti-Jewish hate in all level of governments and public institutions.

Australia’s highest-profile vice-chancellor, University of Canberra chief and ex-Labor leader Bill Shorten, warned his sector that it could not hide behind “academic freedom” and must work with Ms Segal in her plan to fight anti-­Semitism on campuses.

Ms Segal will also work with the ABC and SBS to make sure they are taking social cohesion into account and make sure judges, prosecutors and police are trained to deal with anti-Semitic hate crimes.

Israel’s ambassador to Australia, Amir Maimon, was among Jewish leaders in Australia who lauded Thursday’s plan as the most significant step yet into solving a crisis that has seen Jewish Australians targeted on campus, in synagogues, and even in childcare centres since the October 7 massacres and the outbreak of the Israel-Hamas war in late 2023.

In his strongest comments since the crisis broke out, Mr Albanese said he would not stand by and let Jewish Australians be vilified and abused under the guise of pro-Palestinian activism.

“Anti-Semitism is an evil scourge,” the Prime Minister said in Sydney. “There is no place in Australia for anti-Semitism. The kind of hatred and violence that we’ve seen on our streets recently is despicable, and it won’t be tolerated. And I want those responsible to face the full force of the law.”

Mr Albanese made it clear he would not walk away from his ­government’s strong criticisms of the Israeli government’s actions in its war against Gaza terror group Hamas but said the pro-Palestine movement’s targeting of individual Jews was “delusional” and “destructive”.

“Where the line has been crossed is in blaming and identifying people because they happen to be Jewish.” he said. “If you have a view about the directions of the Netanyahu government, or any other government for that matter … I saw on the ABC the other night, a woman who participated in the trashing and violence that occurred at the restaurant in Melbourne.

“Justifying that, justifying it. There is no justification for that whatsoever. And what’s more, the idea that somehow the cause of justice for Palestinians is advanced by behaviour like that is not only delusional, it is destructive.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109297

File: 855bc562b3ceea8⋯.jpg (151.19 KB,1280x720,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: a9b5d009df398eb⋯.jpg (338.67 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23314377 (120914ZJUL25) Notable: Protect our spaces from transgender women, lesbian group tells court – The Lesbian Action Group has joined Giggle app founder Sall Grover’s Federal Court appeal against a ruling that she unlawfully discriminated against transgender woman Roxanne Tickle. The group argues biological women are entitled to female-only spaces under the Sex Discrimination Act, warning lesbians are pressured to accept sex with trans women and risk social isolation if they refuse. Their submission cites dangers to schools, shelters and privacy if biological men are legally recognised as women. Sex Discrimination Commissioner Anna Cody and the Australian Human Rights Commission support Ms Tickle’s case.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109282

Protect our spaces from transgender women, lesbian group tells court

STEPHEN RICE - July 11, 2025

1/2

Female-only spaces for biological women must be protected by law, in part because lesbians are now regularly being pressured to have sex with trans women and face ­social isolation if they don’t comply, according to a lesbian group that will appear in the Federal Court in support of Giggle app founder Sall Grover.

In a rare move, the court has granted the Melbourne-based Lesbian Action Group “intervener” status in Ms Grover’s appeal against the ruling last year that she unlawfully discriminated against transgender woman Roxanne Tickle by rejecting her from the networking app because she was a biological man.

The Lesbian Action Group ­ argues that biological women have a right under the Sex Discrimination Act to their own safe spaces, stating in a submission obtained by The Australian that “it is now commonplace for lesbians to be pressured into having sex with transwomen, and to face risk of social isolation if they do not agree with that very concept.”

The intervention pits the long-established lesbian group not just against Tickle but against Sex Discrimination Commissioner Anna Cody who has also been granted amicus curiae (friend of the court) status in the case.

The commissioner says she is simply “seeking to assist the court by providing submissions about the meaning, scope and validity of relevant provisions of the Sex Discrimination Act and that she “has not made submissions about whether Ms Tickle was in fact discriminated against”.

However, the commissioner’s position largely mirrored Ms Tickle’s submissions in the case last year that sex is “changeable” and non-binary, and Dr Cody publicly welcomed judge Robert Bromwich’s decision in favour of Ms Tickle.

“We are pleased this case has recognised that every individual, regardless of their gender identity, deserves equal and fair treatment under the law,” Dr Cody said after the ruling.

The Australian Human Rights Commission estimates it will have spent about $35,000 briefing barristers to represent the Sex Discrimination Commissioner by the end of the current appeal.

The Lesbian Action Group was granted amicus status because it has an interest in the outcome of the case after seeking an exemption from the Sex Discrimination Act in 2023 to hold regular “lesbians born female only” social events.

“We have witnessed the demise of our culture and lesbian space since the early 1990s … in part because of the rise of mainstream LGBTIQ+ and also because of diversity and inclusion laws which currently make it ­illegal for lesbians to hold public female-only functions without applying for an exemption with the Human Rights Commission,” the group said.

The AHRC rejected the exemption, finding that although it would be legal for the Lesbian Action Group to ban men and heterosexual women, it could not discriminate against transgender lesbian women.

The group lost an appeal in the Administrative Appeals Tribunal but a challenge in the Federal Court has been stayed pending the outcome of the Giggle v Tickle appeal.

The group argues in its submission that undermining the sex-based protections of the Sex Discrimination Act “denies autonomy, dignity and safety” to lesbians.

There are “dangers in a male capable, or giving the appearance of being capable, of procreation being classified by the law as a female, despite the best intentions of gender ideology”, says the submission, prepared by Melbourne barristers Leigh Howard and Megan Blake.

“It is the lived experience of lesbians to be confronted by autogynephilic men (those who become sexually aroused by the idea of themselves as women) seeking lesbian attention, as a means of generating sexual gratification for themselves.

“It is now commonplace for lesbians to be pressured into having sex with transwomen, and to face risk of social isolation if they do not agree with that very concept. This is unacceptable.

“The appeal must proceed on the basis that the Giggle app is intended to be used by women (members of the female sex) to the exclusion of Ms Tickle (a member of the male sex).

“Construing the Sex Discrimination Act in this way properly accommodates the needs of members of the female sex, and does not diminish any protection afforded to Ms Tickle and the broader transgender community by the act.

“This community, like members of the female sex, can establish their own special measures.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109298

File: c23d2d65b4c8f87⋯.jpg (2.78 MB,5000x3332,1250:833,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 42e987ee529e039⋯.jpg (152.21 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23314404 (120932ZJUL25) Notable: No joke: trans woman wants $40k because female-only app founder giggled at caricature – Transgender woman Roxanne Tickle is seeking at least $40,000 from Giggle app founder Sall Grover, arguing a brief laugh at a caricature during last year’s Federal Court hearing compounded discrimination. Justice Robert Bromwich had already awarded Tickle $10,000, finding Grover’s response “offensive and belittling.” In a cross-appeal, Tickle argues the sum was “manifestly inadequate” and seeks aggravated damages over public comments and misgendering. Grover, who is appealing the ruling, said her laugh was an involuntary reaction. The Federal Court will hear both the appeal and cross-appeal in August.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109282

>>109297

No joke: trans woman wants $40k because female-only app founder giggled at caricature

STEPHEN RICE - July 09, 2025

1/2

Transgender woman Roxanne Tickle wants Giggle app founder Sall Grover to pay her at least $40,000 because the female-only platform creator laughed in court when shown a caricature of Tickle during cross-examination in a sex discrimination hearing last year.

Grover and her Giggle platform are appealing a Federal Court ruling last year that they indirectly discriminated against Ms Tickle when they rejected her from the app because she did not appear to be female.

Tickle is also appealing parts of that decision, arguing judge Robert Bromwich should have found she was the victim of direct, rather than indirect, discrimination.

Justice Bromwich awarded Tickle $10,000, in part because Grover had briefly laughed in court at “an offensive caricature” of Tickle that she had been asked to look at during cross-­examination, a moment the judge found “offensive and belittling”.

“Her explanation, that it was funny in the context of the courtroom, was obviously disingenuous,” he said.

Grover told The Australian: “It was just this moment of such ­ridiculousness that I was in this high stakes, incredibly stressful time, when you’re sitting in the witness box in Federal Court and they turn to a cartoon meme, and I just burst out laughing.

“It wouldn’t have even been three seconds, it was just a complete involuntary human response to something and the judge said that that caused Tickle harm. It’s just ridiculous.”

Justice Bromwich declined to award aggravated damages over the incident because he accepted that Grover was “expressing a genuine, if (as I accept) hurtful belief that Ms Tickle is a man”.

In a cross-appeal submission obtained by The Australian, ­Tickle claims the $10,000 general damages award was “manifestly inadequate” and she should be awarded at least $30,000 in general damages, and at least $10,000 in aggravated damages.

Tickle says the hurt caused was more than “slight” and came on top of “disparaging and hurtful comments by Ms Grover in public forums about transgender women”.

Tickle claims she should have been awarded aggravated damages because Grover “engaged in a sustained attack on Ms Tickle’s integrity and gender identity, infused with innuendo that Ms Tickle, and indeed transgender women more generally, pose a threat or danger to cisgender women”.

Tickle also complains about “the constant and continual misgendering of Ms Tickle by Ms Grover and Giggle throughout the earlier proceedings” as well as Grover’s “campaign” based on gender identity.

Grover’s refusal to provide Tickle with access to the app ­“because she did not appear to be a cisgender woman” was direct and unlawful discrimination under the Sex Discrimination Act, ­Tickle’s submission argues.

According to the submission prepared by silk Georgina Costello, the trial judge wrongly concluded that to find discrimination by reason of a person’s gender identity, the discriminator must first be aware of the person’s gender identity.

The legislation’s deliberately broad definition of “gender identity” was intended to confer broad protection from discrimination, the submission argues, so it didn’t matter whether Grover was aware that Tickle identified as a woman.

In any event, the submission argues, Grover and Giggle clearly had a policy of excluding both men and transgender women from the Giggle App.

Their exclusion of Tickle from the app, followed by a refusal to re-admit, “demonstrated a pattern of delegitimising Ms Tickle’s gender identity”.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109299

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23314434 (120956ZJUL25) Notable: Video: ‘Enormous value’: UK’s top AUKUS envoy insists the pact delivers for the US – Sir Stephen Lovegrove, the UK’s special envoy on AUKUS, said Australia’s “massive” contributions to the submarine pact provide “enormous value” to Washington despite the Trump administration’s snap review. He told ABC’s 7.30 that US defence agencies strongly backed AUKUS, with Australia funding the American submarine industrial base and developing a maintenance hub in Western Australia to keep more Virginia-class boats at sea. While noting “schedule is king,” Lovegrove said he was confident the UK would boost production capacity and all three nations remained committed to meeting 2027 milestones.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>73634 (pb)

'Enormous value': UK's top AUKUS envoy insists the pact delivers for the US

Stephen Dziedzic - 9 Jul 2025

1/2

The United Kingdom's top AUKUS envoy has backed Australia's "massive" contributions to the defence technology pact, saying the agreement delivers "enormous value" to the US and its two military allies.

The US Department of Defense caught Australia by surprise in May when it kickstarted an internal snap review of AUKUS, saying it wanted to ensure it was aligned with Donald Trump's "America First" agenda.

Former top British civil servant Sir Stephen Lovegrove — who conducted the UK's own review of the AUKUS pact before being appointed as Prime Minister Keir Starmer's special envoy — is visiting Australia for talks with senior officials and top brass.

He told ABC's 7.30 program that he was "not worried" about the Trump administration's review, because AUKUS enjoyed "huge" support in Washington DC, and delivered major benefits to the US.

"The US Navy is right behind it; I speak to them a lot. The State Department is very much behind it [and] many players in the Defence Department are completely engaged in AUKUS and everything it brings to the US," he said.

"So I'm pretty comfortable that we'll end up with the right answer for the US, Australia and the UK — this is a critical, critical program."

The senior Trump administration official conducting the AUKUS review, Elbridge Colby, has warned the US will only be able to sell Virginia Class submarines to Australia under AUKUS if it succeeds in lifting its own pace of production to at least two boats a year.

Australia is already pouring billions of dollars into the US submarine industrial base under AUKUS, but Sir Lovegrove said Australia's promise to develop a submarine maintenance hub in Western Australia would also make it easier for US Navy to keep more boats in the water.

"Clearly one of the things that they're going to be looking at is whether or not they're building [the Virginia Class submarines] fast enough, but one of the other crucial things they're going to be looking at is the massive contribution that Australia is making by allowing Western Australia to be used as a maintenance and sustainment hub," he said.

"And that will mean that there are many more Virginias which are capable of being put to sea. So this is a real win-win for all of the nations."

Under AUKUS both US and UK submarines will begin to rotate through the HMAS Stirling naval base from as early as 2027, and the federal government has promised to plough more than $120 million into transforming the nearby Henderson shipyard into a precinct which can service nuclear-powered submarines.

But earlier this week the former US Navy Secretary Richard Spencer warned that Australia needed to move more quickly to upgrade both HMAS Stirling and the Henderson shipyard, to ensure they were ready by 2027.

"We need to start moving dirt, putting the infrastructure in, because 2027 is going to be here within the blink of an eye," he told The Nightly.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109300

File: 65b534d2cfac6b2⋯.jpg (645.83 KB,2048x1366,1024:683,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 668f1467d03f382⋯.jpg (262 KB,2000x1334,1000:667,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23314507 (121042ZJUL25) Notable: If we go to war, submarines come too: How US could demand AUKUS changes – Australia faces pressure from a Trump administration review led by undersecretary of defence Elbridge Colby, who may demand Canberra pay more for submarines and guarantee their use in a conflict over Taiwan. Sources say Colby questions selling Virginia-class subs while US production lags, and wants assurances Australia’s boats would fight under US command. The review has divided Washington, with the State Department and Congress backing AUKUS while Pentagon sceptics push for tougher terms. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese, soon to meet Xi Jinping, risks political fallout as debates continue.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109299

If we go to war, submarines come too: How US could demand AUKUS changes

Paul Sakkal and Michael Koziol - July 10, 2025

1/2

Australia is facing the prospect of a Trump administration review demanding it pay more for submarines under the $368 billion AUKUS pact and guarantee the boats support the US in a conflict over Taiwan.

Sources familiar with the review by Trump’s undersecretary of defence, Elbridge Colby, believe he intends to urge major changes to the program before Australia can get the nuclear submarines it has been promised.

The review puts Anthony Albanese in a politically difficult position as the prime minister prepares to meet Chinese President Xi Jinping during a six-day trip to China next week.

But the Trump administration is not united behind Colby’s thinking, according to former aides, with foreign policy a major sticking point in the Republican Party.

The review from Colby, who works for the Pentagon and is sceptical of selling US submarines to Australia, blindsided Marco Rubio’s State Department when it was revealed in press reports last month. The State Department sent its diplomats a message: “We are not aware of a review of the AUKUS agreement.”

Interviews with three Australian sources with direct knowledge of the AUKUS review and American defence experts who worked on the submarine project believe the probe will recommend amending rather than scrapping the deal brokered by former leaders Joe Biden, Scott Morrison and Boris Johnson.

Two Australian officials said one option for Colby was to seek more money for the US submarine industry, which Australia is already contributing $4.7 billion towards.

Two other Australian sources, one in the political establishment and one in defence who have both spoken to Colby, said Colby believed Australia should give a public declaration or private guarantee that US-made nuclear submarines would be used in a possible conflict with China.

Colby is on record as saying the US is not building enough Virginia-class subs for its own needs, even before selling Australia a minimum of three from 2030.

It is not clear if Colby’s boss, Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth, or the broader White House support those ideas. The administration is split between isolationists, old school Republican globalists, and those who see China as the biggest threat, of which Colby is one.

The Pentagon last week moved to pause weapons deliveries to Ukraine at Colby’s urging, but Trump reversed the move just days later. Foreign policy chaos in the White House has made it difficult for Australian officials to gauge how much impact the undersecretary’s review will have.

One senior Australian official said Colby’s scepticism about selling submarines was not widespread.

“People are mistaking Colby as being the only driver of opinion in the US,” the source said, on condition of anonymity. “He’s an important voice, but not the only voice. There are multiple views about AUKUS within the US administration.”

Jennifer Hendrixson White, a former US official who was the lead negotiator for the AUKUS legislation in the Senate, also indicated Rubio’s department was caught off guard by Colby’s review, and said the State Department and Congress supported AUKUS.

She said leasing rather than selling the submarine was a subject of intense debate when the legislation was passed.

“It’s reasonable to expect the new team will want to put their mark on the agreement, but I don’t expect they will jettison it entirely,” White said. “With this team, there’s always a desire to increase leverage and ‘get a better deal’.

“If I was in London or Canberra, I would count on increased defence spending being one of the things the Administration is looking for. They have made similar requests across the board with other allies and partners.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109301

File: 2660b989a25405a⋯.jpg (171.96 KB,1280x720,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23314548 (121110ZJUL25) Notable: No missiles … but Defence can fire off a cookbook for ‘harmony’ – Defence’s Guided Weapons and Explosive Ordnance Group, tasked with building a $20bn missile industry, has produced a $1800 “Taste of Harmony” cookbook instead, featuring recipes from staff and commander Air Marshal Leon Phillips. Senior officers ordered the book buried amid frustration over slow progress on missile production and looming job cuts. Defence Minister Richard Marles is planning a major departmental shake-up as costs blow out under AUKUS. Opposition figures ridiculed the cookbook, saying taxpayers expect missiles, not menus, while industry sources warned the project had failed to deliver.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109281

No missiles … but Defence can fire off a cookbook for ‘harmony’

BEN PACKHAM - July 09, 2025

1/2

They say an army marches on its stomach and so too does Defence’s Guided Weapons and Explosive Ordnance Group, which has produced a “Taste of Harmony” cookbook with taxpayers’ funds.

The group, headed by Air Marshal Leon Phillips, has its work cut out establishing a $20bn-plus domestic missile manufacturing industry – a goal that remains a distant one.

But Phillips believes the “incredible power” of food will help his team get the job done, authorising an $1800 print run of the recipe book to celebrate Harmony Week earlier this year.

“In line with this year’s theme of ‘Everyone Belongs’, this book serves as a reminder that every member of GWEO group is valued as we work together towards our shared purpose,” he says in the book’s foreword.

“I encourage each of you to continue to embrace our shared values and create an environment where everyone truly belongs.”

The group’s staff contributed their favourite recipes, including a Chinese-inspired “Mystery meat stir fry”, and a “Loaded potato soup”.

Phillips, a keen amateur gourmet, shares his recipe for Spaghetti ai gamberi, urging his subordinates to “pair this meal with great company and a lovely dry riesling”.

But not everyone shares his passion for food-led team building, with orders coming down for the book to be buried amid high-level concerns over the GWEO group’s progress.

The Australian obtained a copy of the culinary compendium as Defence’s most senior officers braced for news of looming job cuts, with dozens of commanders and senior public service executives set to face the chop.

Defence Minister Richard Marles has ordered sweeping reforms to his department, warning “everything is on the table” amid tensions over budget blowouts and delays in getting new weapons and equipment into service.

The Australian revealed this week that up to 25 star-ranked Australian Defence Force officers could be drummed out, while 20 to 40 public service executive positions could be cut.

It’s understood senior commanders will be briefed on the changes in coming days. There was speculation in military circles this week that Defence could waive a requirement preventing former officers from taking consulting jobs for 12 months after entering civilian life.

The GWEO group faces being rolled into a new ­armaments directorate with the department’s vast and underperforming Capability Acquisition and Sustainment Group and its Naval Shipbuilding and Sustainment Group.

The bureaucratic shake-up would leave Phillips fighting for his job, while CASG head Chris Deeble could also be vulnerable.

Mr Marles said in April 2023 he was “confident” Australia could begin producing guided missiles within two years, but there has been little progress on the GWEO initiative.

One well-placed industry source said: “I’d be cautious about any cooking times suggested in the cookbook given the amount of time it’s taking for the missile plan to come to a boil.

“They just haven’t done anything. They’re meant to be delivering a whole lot of locally-made missiles to increase our stocks for times of war and that just hasn’t progressed beyond orders for foreign missiles that are already in our catalogue.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109302

File: a21210773fbf50a⋯.jpg (950.75 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 4c97e835f924507⋯.jpg (204.8 KB,1280x720,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: b1ea1414ec3aeed⋯.jpg (961.28 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23314590 (121139ZJUL25) Notable: ‘Central base of operations’: Australia-US alliance carved into the landscape – Facilities like Western Australia’s Harold E Holt station and Pine Gap in the Northern Territory highlight Australia’s critical role in US war planning, relaying messages to submarines and providing early warning of nuclear attack. New AUKUS radar and submarine hubs, as well as US bomber and Marine rotations, reinforce Australia’s position as what US congressman Michael McCaul called “the central base of operations” against China. Defence Minister Richard Marles stresses these joint sites operate with “full knowledge and concurrence,” but analysts warn their importance makes them prime targets in any conflict.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109224

>>109299

‘Central base of operations’: Australia-US alliance carved into the landscape

BEN PACKHAM - July 11, 2025

1/3

Etched into the ancient red sands of Western Australia’s Northwest Cape is a network of dirt roads that, seen from above, carve a ­mysterious network of geometric shapes into the landscape.

For most Australians, clinging to the continent’s east and southwest coasts, the Harold E Holt Naval Communications Station is out of sight and out of mind.

Towering radio masts rise from its central point and each corner of its two hexagonal ring roads, broadcasting very-low frequency signals to Australian and US submarines, including nuclear-armed American “boomers”.

As Australians recoil from Donald Trump, Anthony Albanese has pointedly asserted Australia’s independence in its relationship with the US, praising wartime leader John Curtin in a speech last Saturday for giving the nation the confidence “to think and act for ourselves”.

But the reality is that Australia’s security is so tightly wound up with the US’s strategic posture that the two would be almost impossible to disentangle.

The isolated Harold E Holt station, pictured in a stunning aerial photograph taken last September, is just one example of the array of facilities on Australian soil that would play a critical role in a US war with China.

It’s possible, though Australians will never know, the station’s transmitters relayed messages to the Ohio-class submarine that launched 30 Tomahawk missiles on Iranian nuclear sites last month.

Nearly 1700km southeast as the crow flies is another more well-known national security installation, Pine Gap. It’s been ingrained in the national consciousness, inspiring sporadic protests and one of Midnight Oil’s most famous songs – Power and the Passion. (“Flat chat, Pine Gap, in every home a Big Mac. And no one goes outback, that’s that.”)

Few know, however, that this joint Australian-US facility 18km south of Alice Springs gives the US 20-30 minutes advance warning time of a Russian or Chinese ­nuclear attack.

That’s long enough for whoever is in the White House to launch a devastating counterstrike. It’s this guarantee of mutually assured destruction that, theoretically, keeps America’s enemies from pressing the button, and gives credibility to the US’s extended nuclear umbrella that protects its allies, including Australia.

Top secret files leaked by former NSA officer Edward Snowden confirmed Pine Gap, codenamed “RAINFALL”, also “plays a significant role in supporting both intelligence activities and military operations”, feeding in signals intelligence to the US’s ECHELON surveillance program.

Its capabilities include the geolocation of individuals from their mobile phone signals, allowing them to be assassinated by drone strikes.

These sites and a handful of others are the physical manifestations of the Australia-US alliance. Together with new “force posture initiates” allowing the US military to operate from Australian soil, they are critical to America’s war plans. They are what Defence Minister Richard Marles was talking about when he pointed to the contribution Australia’s geography would make to any conflict ­between the US and China.

“Our continent is more relevant to great power contest now than it’s ever been before,” he told The Australian’s Defending Australia summit in June.

“That is as much of a question in the here and now as is the building up of our defence capability.”

Marles is right. But he is tiptoeing around just how strategically important Australia has become to its closest ally.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109303

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23314599 (121143ZJUL25) Notable: Penny Wong issues warning on Chinese threat as Anthony Albanese prepares to fly to Beijing – Foreign Minister Penny Wong has warned that China’s nuclear and military build-up was accelerating “without the transparency that the region expects.” Senator Wong, in Malaysia for meetings with Southeast Asian counterparts, said: “What we seek is a balance of power, where no country dominates and no country is dominated.” Her remarks set the stage for Prime Minister Anthony Albanese’s six-day China visit, where he will meet Xi Jinping while resisting US pressure to double defence spending. Taiwan’s envoy Douglas Hsu urged stronger ties with Canberra and support for Taipei’s CPTPP bid.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109276

>>109288

Penny Wong issues warning on Chinese threat as Anthony Albanese prepares to fly to Beijing

BEN PACKHAM - July 10, 2025

1/2

Foreign Minister Penny Wong has expressed alarm over Beijing’s strategic ambitions and surging military capabilities, two days before Anthony Albanese departs for a six-day visit to China that will be closely watched in Washington for any signs of Australian kowtowing.

Speaking in Malaysia, Senator Wong said Australia didn’t agree with all of Donald Trump’s policies, but strongly supported an ongoing US presence in the Indo-Pacific as a vital counterweight to China’s efforts to shift the ­regional balance of power in its favour.

“China continues to assert its strategic influence and project its military power further into our region,” Senator Wong told the Institute for Strategic and International Studies.

“And we have seen the worrying pace of China’s nuclear and conventional military build-up, without the transparency that the region expects.”

The sharp assessment comes as Taiwan’s envoy to Australia, Douglas Hsu, warns China is ­intensifying military and “grey zone” threats against the self-governed territory, prompting Taipei to step up its preparations for a potential invasion.

Writing in The Australian, Mr Hsu urges the Albanese government to help bring Taiwan further into the international system by ramping up bilateral ties and supporting its bid to join one of the world’s biggest trading blocs.

He says the territory is “perfectly positioned to meet the high standards” of the 12-nation ­Comprehensive and Progressive Trans Pacific Partnership, which Australia is chairing this year. Beijing is also pushing to join the CPTPP, while vehemently opposing Taiwan’s application, and is expected to ramp up lobbying of the Prime Minister over the issue during his visit from Saturday.

Mr Albanese will have his fourth meeting with Chinese President Xi Jinping during the trip but has been unable to secure his first face-to-face with the US President amid a snap Pentagon review of the AUKUS submarine pact and his government’s refusal to agree to the Trump administration’s demands for a near doubling of the defence budget.

The Prime Minister pushed back against the White House in a speech last Saturday, lauding wartime Labor prime minister John Curtin for refusing to outsource foreign policy and giving Australians the confidence to speak “for ourselves, as a sovereign state”. He reportedly sharpened his remarks in a subsequent question-and-answer session, saying he was a supporter of AUKUS, “but that doesn’t mean that we are subservient to any other country”.

Senator Wong, in Malaysia for meetings with Southeast Asian counterparts, sought to set the tone for Mr Albanese’s China visit, urging Beijing to “wield its strength in a way that contributes to its security and economic resilience”. She said Australia was ­realistic about China’s intention to assert its influence as a major regional power, while urging it not to provoke a clash with the US. “None of us, including the United States, seeks military confrontation with China – in the South China Sea, the East China Sea or across the Taiwan Strait,” Senator Wong said.

“What we seek is a balance of power, where no country dominates and no country is dominated.”

She said Australia’s realistic assessment of China’s place in the region was behind the government’s efforts to stabilise the Australia-China relationship, and strengthen its partnerships with the rest of the region.

Her speech follows a warning by Treasurer Jim Chalmers that Australia will continue to rebuff Chinese calls for the weakening of foreign investment rules barring its companies from taking stakes in critical infrastructure, energy, data and minerals ventures.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109304

File: 1eebec904b29fae⋯.jpg (967.07 KB,4025x2683,4025:2683,Clipboard.jpg)

File: d7639076aafb4f0⋯.jpg (136.68 KB,1280x720,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23314635 (121215ZJUL25) Notable: COMMENTARY: Strengthening ties with Taiwan need not upset Beijing“Under Xi Jinping’s rule, the past 13 years have seen a dramatic transformation in China’s strategic posture and military ambitions. Xi’s China has militarised the South China Sea in defiance of international law. It has weaponised trade and levied punitive sanctions on Taiwan’s agricultural products, as well as Australian wine, beef, barley and coal. I ask the Prime Minister to reflect on what is unfolding across the Taiwan Strait: 23 million patriotic Taiwanese are rehearsing for a full-scale invasion, with drills designed to gauge how fast they can pivot from weekday routine to wartime survival. Taiwan stands ready to deepen our partnership with Australia. With global trade policy uncertainty at a 50-year high, Taiwan offers collaboration and innovation anchored in an open, rules-based trading order where no country shall coerce or dominate another.” – Douglas Hsu, Taiwan’s chief representative in Australia - The Australian

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109276

>>109288

>>109303

COMMENTARY: Strengthening ties with Taiwan need not upset Beijing

Douglas Hsu - July 11, 2025

1/2

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese will touch down in China on Saturday for a historic seven-day visit. While dialogue and mutually beneficial co-operation are important, Australians know successful engagement requires an understanding that China’s political system prioritises state power over all else. Under Xi Jinping’s rule, the past 13 years have seen a dramatic transformation in China’s strategic posture and military ambitions.

Xi’s China has militarised the South China Sea in defiance of international law. It has imposed its will on Hong Kong, undercutting its long-agreed autonomy. It has weaponised trade and levied punitive trade sanctions on Taiwan’s agricultural products, as well as Australian wine, beef, barley and coal. China has become more openly aggressive in the Taiwan Strait, increasing both the frequency and intensity of its military threats and grey-zone activities. These actions continue: last Monday China unilaterally activated a west-to-east flight path, challenging Taiwan’s situation awareness and betraying a decade-long commitment to consult on such moves. This has further heightened regional tensions.

Engaging with the Australian public through the lens of China always seems to me to do a disservice to the important story my country of Taiwan is writing. Taiwan is a world-class maritime trading power with a sophisticated economy and cutting-edge tech sector. The island has an exemplary track record of meeting international trade obligations. It’s perfectly positioned to meet the high standards required by agreements such as the Comprehensive and Progressive Trans Pacific Partnership, or CPTPP.

During his post-election visit to Indonesia, the Prime Minister offered support for Jakarta’s CPTPP application. This is welcomed because “trade liberalisation serves the collective good”, as former DFAT secretary Peter Varghese has written for the Lowy Institute. Geopolitics, not economic and trade merit, appears to be determining the queue, given Taiwan’s CPTPP application was lodged in September 2021. It’s time to put prosperity over politics and move Taiwan’s CPTPP application forward. As CPTPP chair this year, Australia has the chance to focus on real economic opportunity, which helps fulfil the potential of this gold-standard agreement.

Taiwan’s true muscle is witnessed daily in our humming semiconductor fabs, which produce 90 per cent of the world’s most advanced chips, essential for a huge range of applications that power our daily life and fuel our ambitions. Few realise these facilities will soon consume more than 12 per cent of Taiwan’s electricity – largely from gas-fired power plants fuelled by Australian LNG – underlining the critical energy relationship between our economies.

Taiwan is a natural partner for the Albanese government’s economic agenda. Our semiconductor expertise can play a substantial role in supporting the Future Made in Australia vision, from critical minerals processing to advanced manufacturing. Our AI leadership spans chip design to responsible development frameworks. While others seek to dominate, Taiwan partners.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109305

File: e84ff22d5b0c55a⋯.mp4 (1.49 MB,1024x768,4:3,Clipboard.mp4)

File: 22b3c0408985d35⋯.jpg (332.34 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23314662 (121238ZJUL25) Notable: ‘Stable ties’ with Beijing as Chinese spy ships head our way – Defence officials expect Chinese surveillance vessels to monitor Talisman Sabre 2025 as Anthony Albanese embarks on a five-day visit to China, including meetings with Xi Jinping and Premier Li Qiang. Albanese said he would raise “the full range of issues,” from Taiwan and South China Sea navigation to the detention of Yang Hengjun, insisting “We co-operate where we can and we disagree where we must.” Penny Wong warned of a “permanent state of competition” with Beijing, while Michaelia Cash urged Albanese to reinforce support for the US presence.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109276

>>109303

‘Stable ties’ with Beijing as Chinese spy ships head our way

BEN PACKHAM - July 11, 2025

1/2

Defence officials are bracing for the arrival of Chinese spy ships off Australia’s coast in coming days as Anthony Albanese prepares to press the flesh with the country’s President, Xi Jinping, during a ­record five-day trip taking in Shanghai, Beijing and panda capital Chengdu.

The Prime Minister, who ­departs for China on Saturday, will use the visit to highlight his government’s efforts to stabilise ties with the nation’s biggest trading partner, while sidestepping difficult questions on Beijing’s strategic intentions.

The trip coincides with the start of Australia’s largest military exercise, Talisman Sabre, which is expected to be watched at a ­distance by multiple Chinese surveillance ships after it gets under way on Sunday.

A Defence spokeswoman told The Australian: “It would not be unusual or unexpected for China to monitor Exercise Talisman Sabre 2025, as it has during previous iterations of this exercise. Defence monitors all traffic in our maritime approaches.”

The biennial war games will bring together military personnel and equipment from 19 nations for land, air, sea, space and cyber exercises, offering a rich intelligence-gathering opportunity for Beijing, which has sent spy ships to lurk off Queensland for the past three Talisman Sabres.

Mr Albanese, who is yet to meet Donald Trump in person, will have his fourth meeting with Mr Xi during the trip, as well as annual talks with Chinese Premier Li Qiang, and a sit-down with National People’s Congress chairman Zhao Leji.

The visit is the longest by an Australian prime minister to China in living memory and comes amid tensions between Australia and the US over the Prime Minister’s refusal to lift ­defence spending and the Pentagon’s snap review of the AUKUS submarine program.

It comes just over six months after Beijing lifted the last of its $20bn worth of punitive trade bans on Australian exporters. Australia’s biggest companies are keen to leverage the improvement in relations, with Mr Albanese to be accompanied by a delegation of CEOs led by the Business Council of Australia.

China will attempt to drive a further wedge between Australia and its closest ally during the trip by urging closer trade co-operation to counter Mr Trump’s tariff chaos. It is expected to renew its calls for Australia to back its bid to join the 12-nation trans-Pacific trade deal, seek the relaxation of Australia’s foreign investment rules, and urge co-operation on artificial intelligence. All are red lines for Canberra.

Beijing is also likely to pressure Mr Albanese to abandon his pledge to force ­Chinese-owned company Landbridge to relinquish its lease over the Port of Darwin, amid government ­silence on the issue since the election.

Mr Albanese said he would raise the “full range of issues” in the nations’ bilateral relationship in his closed-door talks with China’s leaders. These will ­include a call for the release of ­detained Australian writer Yang Hengjun, and for Beijing to maintain the status quo on Taiwan and allow freedom of navigation in the South China Sea.

“We co-operate where we can and we disagree where we must, and we’re able to have those honest conversations about some of the disagreements that are there,” Mr Albanese said on Friday.

“Australia and China have different political systems. We have, therefore, different values that are reflected in those political systems. But we have got to be able to have that engagement directly and that is what we will be doing.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109306

File: 85fd889203ff602⋯.jpg (338.62 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 21150097431f22c⋯.jpg (331.03 KB,2047x1152,2047:1152,Clipboard.jpg)

File: ebc99ffd73abac6⋯.jpg (254.69 KB,2047x1152,2047:1152,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23314682 (121250ZJUL25) Notable: Anthony Albanese lands in China, while Australian Defence officials brace for arrival of spy ships – Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has landed in Shanghai for a record five-day visit, calling it “wonderful” to return to Australia’s largest trading partner. He will meet Xi Jinping and Premier Li Qiang, promote a new tourism deal, and attend panda diplomacy events in Chengdu. The trip highlights economic ties worth $312bn annually, with Albanese noting “one in four of Australia’s jobs depends on our exports.” Meanwhile, Defence expects Chinese spy ships to shadow Talisman Sabre 2025, a three-week exercise involving 19 nations and over 30,000 personnel.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109224

>>109276

>>109303

Anthony Albanese lands in China, while Australian Defence officials brace for arrival of spy ships

BEN PACKHAM - 12 July 2025

Anthony Albanese will look to lure thousands more cashed-up Chinese tourists to Australia as he begins his record five-day charm offensive in Shanghai on Sunday.

Arriving in China’s financial capital just before 8pm AEST Saturday, the Prime Minister declared it was “wonderful” to be back in the country that supports millions of Australian jobs as the nation’s biggest trading partner.

The first full day of his visit will be spent spruiking Australia’s tourism drawcards and launching a reworked marketing campaign amid a slower than expected rebound in visitor arrivals from China.

Mr Albanese said it was a “great honour” to represent Australia during the trip, which will include high-level talks with Xi Jinping and Chinese Premier Li Qiang in Beijing, and a visit to panda breeding capital Chengdu.

The meeting with President Xi will be Mr Albanese’s fourth, underscoring his failure so far to secure a first face-to-face meeting with US President Donald Trump.

The visit comes as Defence officials in Australia brace for the arrival of one or more Chinese spy ships off Australia’s coast in coming days to monitor the nation’s biggest military exercise, Talisman Sabre.

The three-week long exercise opens Sunday and will involve 19 nations, including the US and Japan, and more than 30,000 personnel.

In China, Mr Albanese will oversee a new deal between Tourism Australia and Trip.com, before holding a media event with the Shanghai Port Football Club, coached by former Socceroo Kevin Muscat.

A revamped version of the 2022 “Come and Say G’Day” campaign, starring a toy kangaroo called Ruby voiced by actor Rose Byrne, will also be released, featuring popular Chinese actor Yu Shi.

The latest Bureau of Statistics data showed short term visitor arrivals in Australia at 8.5 per cent below 2019 levels, with the market out of China among the slowest to return. In the 12 months to April, New Zealand accounted for 19 per cent of all visitor arrivals followed by China at 12 per cent and the UK at 9 per cent.

While trailing New Zealand on arrivals, China outpaces all other markets on spend, which was valued at $9.2bn a year

The Prime Minister, who is accompanied by a major business delegation, said the trip “speaks to the importance of the economic relationship between Australia and China”.

“We know that one in four of Australia’s jobs depends on our exports, and China is our major trading partner, with exports to China being worth more in value than the next four countries combined,” he said on the tarmac after his RAAF jet touched down.

“This week, we will have important meetings about tourism, about decarbonisation of steel, about the full range of issues.”

Mr Albanese is likely to sidestep questions about strategic tensions between Australia and China during the trip, which Foreign Minister Penny Wong highlighted last week warning China’s massive military build-up was destabilising the region.

She urged Beijing not to provoke a clash with the US, which has warned Beijing is preparing to invade Taiwan.

A Defence spokeswoman told The Australian on Friday: “It would not be unusual or unexpected for China to monitor Exercise Talisman Sabre 2025, as it has during previous iterations of this exercise. Defence monitors all traffic in our maritime approaches.”

The presence of Chinese warships off Australia’s coast will revive memories of the heavily-armed flotilla of Chinese warships that conducted a surprise live-fire drill in the Tasman Sea in February before circumnavigating the country in an unprecedented show of force.

ANU international law expert Don Rothwell said given that experience, “the government may feel the need to conduct a more robust response to the presence of the PLAN offshore Australia’s coast”.

Mr Albanese was met at the airport by Australia’s Ambassador to China Scott Dewar, China’s Ambassador to Australia Xiao Qian, and received a bouquet of flowers from two young children.

The visit is the longest by an Australian prime minister to China in living memory and comes amid tensions between Australia and the US over the Prime Minister’s refusal to lift ­defence spending and the Pentagon’s snap review of the AUKUS submarine program.

China is far and away Australia’s largest trading partner, with total two-way goods and services trade valued at $312bn in 2024 – more than Australia’s next three trading partners combined.

The trip comes just over six months after Beijing lifted the last of its $20bn worth of punitive trade bans on Australian exporters.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/anthony-albanese-lands-in-china-while-australian-defence-officials-brace-for-arrival-of-spy-ships/news-story/c6bac717094b6919d77bfc8b5defd43f

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109307

File: a11276813a8461e⋯.jpg (263.42 KB,2000x1126,1000:563,Clipboard.jpg)

File: d3bc6303cdb33a5⋯.jpg (131.49 KB,1350x759,450:253,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 1ef15d56bcbe2cd⋯.jpg (186.07 KB,1350x759,450:253,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 011c43788e9bd23⋯.jpg (267.29 KB,1280x720,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23314703 (121302ZJUL25) Notable: In the hills of Australia, Pacific allies are training to fight Beijing – Japanese and Australian artillery crews joined US Marines in a live-fire drill near Townsville during Southern Jackaroo, underscoring deepening military integration aimed at deterring China. About 3000 troops took part, the largest since the exercise began in 2013. The training comes as Beijing expands naval and air activity across the region, prompting allies to boost readiness. Southern Jackaroo precedes Talisman Sabre 2025, involving 19 nations and 30,000 personnel. Analysts say Australia, Japan and the US are sharpening collective deterrence. Commanders stressed integration is improving each year, overcoming differences in language and procedure.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109224

In the hills of Australia, Pacific allies are training to fight Beijing

MIKE CHERNEY, THE WALL STREET JOURNAL - 12 July 2025

1/2

In the rugged hills outside the Queensland coastal city of Townsville, Japanese and Australian artillery crews fired in tandem on a distant target. They were assisted by US Marines, who were embedded with the Australian gun teams.

The live-fire drill was the culmination of Southern Jackaroo, an expanding annual exercise in the Australian bush in which the three nations’ forces practise working together as allies.

Although top officers didn’t call out any foe by name, troops taking part said it was clear that they were training to fight China.

As Beijing’s military steadily expands its forays in the Pacific, US allies in the region are realising they could easily be drawn into a conflict with China. They are responding by bolstering their forces and increasing joint drills to ensure they can work together seamlessly.

A primary goal of the combined displays of force is to complicate Beijing’s planning and convince the Chinese leadership that it would be too risky to use military force to assert territorial claims.

Australia and Japan, both of which have security pacts with the US, have emerged as essential US partners in the Pacific. If a war were to erupt, Washington would want Tokyo to sign off on the US using its Japanese bases to confront China and for Australia to send aircraft, ships and troops to Japan to help the fight, some defence analysts say.

“If there’s any argument to be made for a collective approach to deterrence in the region, it’s these three countries,” said Jeffrey Hornung, the Japan lead at Rand, a think tank.

On Friday, the US, Japan and Australia further bolstered their co-operation with a new naval logistics agreement that covers activities such as refuelling and reloading missile systems, which could be vital to improving their defences.

Australia is also gearing up to host the three-week Talisman Sabre exercise opening Sunday. The exercise will involve 19 nations, including the US and Japan, and more than 30,000 personnel.

Multinational manoeuvres are the new normal as the US and its allies prepare for a possible confrontation with China over Taiwan, the self-governing democratic island that Beijing claims as its territory.

China has spent years building up its military – it now has the world’s largest navy – and is using that extra heft to expand its influence, including in areas beyond the “first island chain,” which includes Japan, Taiwan and the Philippines.

China sent an aircraft carrier group to waters east of Iwo Jima, a remote Japanese island, for the first time in June, prompting alerts from Tokyo. In another foray this year, China conducted naval drills near Australia.

At the same time, Beijing has continued to send its armed forces into the waters and airspace around Taiwan. It has expanded its operations in the disputed South China Sea near the Philippines and is increasing its activities in the Yellow Sea, a strategic area between mainland China and the Korean Peninsula.

“The Chinese are stretching their legs,” said Kelly Magsamen, who was chief of staff to US Defence Secretary Lloyd Austin in the Biden administration.

“Their military modernisation has been at a pace that is pretty astounding. And then once you create a military, you start using your military, and you start pushing further and farther afield.”

Beijing has accused the US and its allies of spreading false accusations about the threat from China, and it has denounced the drills as provocations that disrupt peace and stability.

Training is picking up all over the region. In one recent exercise, US tilt-rotor Osprey aircraft carried Marines and Philippine troops to beaches and a nearby airfield where they practised repelling an adversary. In another, F-35 jet fighters from the US, Japan and Australia trained together for the first time in Guam, a US island territory with an expanding military role.

About 3000 troops took part in this year’s Southern Jackaroo, the most since the exercise started in 2013.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109308

File: c0d932337407abf⋯.jpg (2.44 MB,3008x2008,376:251,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 169ec4ae98aa12f⋯.jpg (2.53 MB,3008x2008,376:251,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23314748 (121328ZJUL25) Notable: Meet the Japanese marines getting ready to storm Australian beaches – Japan’s amphibious rapid deployment brigade (ARDB), created in 2018 amid tensions with China, has grown to 3000 troops and will deploy 450 marines, two destroyers and a tank landing ship for Talisman Sabre 2025. Commanding officer Maj Gen Toshikatsu Musha said working with Australian and US forces would “strengthen our mutual understanding and also strengthen interoperability.” Analysts said training now reflects “actual contingencies” such as Taiwan or the Korean Peninsula, with the ARDB focused on defending Japan’s Senkaku Islands, which China also claims. For the unit’s soldiers, Australia offers tougher seas and live-fire training.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109224

>>109307

Meet the Japanese marines getting ready to storm Australian beaches

David King - July 11, 2025

1/2

They are the Japanese army’s newest fighting force – a crack group of highly trained marines whose sole purpose is to storm one of the country’s 10,000 islands and repel any invader.

For the next three weeks, they’re going to call Australia home as they prepare to land on a remote Queensland beach with US and local forces in a simulation of what they could face in a potential conflict.

The amphibious rapid deployment brigade (ARDB) was created just seven years ago as tensions mounted between Japan and China over disputed islands in the East China Sea. Since then, the brigade has grown from one regiment to three – 3000 troops in total.

This masthead was given exclusive access to the brigade’s base at Camp Ainoura, at Sasebo on the southern Japanese island of Kyushu, before the mission to Australia for Talisman Sabre, the massive international military exercise about to get under way in Sydney on Sunday.

Japan’s contingent of 1500 military personnel is its largest deployment to the exercise so far and will include 450 Japanese marines as well as two navy destroyers, a tank landing ship and amphibious vehicles.

Commanding officer major general Toshikatsu Musha said the chance to test his troops with Australian and US forces was extremely valuable, and he was looking forward to more challenging conditions than the calm waters around their training base.

“The higher the waves we have, the better training we can have. So it’s very beneficial to us,” he said.

“Another benefit is we can work with the US Marine Corp and the Australian soldiers, so we can strengthen our mutual understanding and also strengthen interoperability.”

Talisman Sabre involves 30,000 personnel from 19 countries, plus three observer nations, with war games stretching from Jervis Bay in NSW to the Northern Territory and for the first time this year, Papua New Guinea. Giant warships have already started to arrive in Australia’s northern waters.

It is also the largest combined training activity between the Australian Defence Force and the United States military, which the ADF says reflects “the closeness of our alliance”.

Japan, Australia and the US are quickly stepping up their military co-operation in a strategic push against China and the exercises will be the first step in delivering a commitment from the countries’ defence ministers to work together on amphibious warfare.

Simulated beach landings near Rockhampton will involve the 31st US Marines as well as the Japanese units amid concerns in all three countries about China’s military build-up and deepening ties between North Korea and Russia.

China has sent spy ships to monitor the Talisman Sabre exercise regularly since 2017 with a keen interest in how the Japanese navy works with US and Australian forces. Defence Minister Richard Marles said he fully expects China to monitor the operation again in 2025.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109309

File: 8c41344479e9177⋯.jpg (492.71 KB,2000x1125,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 6c0a23fc811b607⋯.jpg (578.45 KB,1200x1800,2:3,Clipboard.jpg)

File: f815ec7e04384b0⋯.jpg (544.97 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 5035a9e46fa477f⋯.jpg (588.49 KB,1785x2745,119:183,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23314818 (121350ZJUL25) Notable: 9th Brigade, US Coast Guard join forces in 30,000 strong Talisman Sabre multi-domain warfighting – More than 30,000 personnel from 19 nations will join Talisman Sabre 2025, with one of the most striking contributions a 1400-strong task group made up mostly of reservists. Australia’s 9th Brigade and the US Coast Guard — which shipped six vessels to Darwin — will patrol communities, waterways and critical infrastructure. 9th Brigade commander Brigadier Tim Orders said reservists bring “real empathy with communities,” while US Cmdr Faith Gamboa called the deployment “a big thing for the US government.” It marks the first time a US Coast Guard Port Security unit has operated in the Indian Ocean.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109224

9th Brigade, US Coast Guard join forces in 30,000 strong Talisman Sabre multi-domain warfighting

Harry Brill - July 10, 2025

While the size and scale of military’s Exercise Talisman Sabre 2025 will captivate the masses, it is the contribution of a single task group that is shaping up to be the most intriguing addition to the mammoth Top End war games exercise.

Starting this weekend, more than 30,000 military personnel from across 19 nations will take to the bush, air and sea to wargame, hitting Territorians with another year of exercise deja vu.

However, at a time when a retention crisis continues to plague the ADF and heated debate surrounds the ‘younger’ generation’s’ desire to enlist, this year’s iteration comes with a positive turnout.

A 1400-strong task group, made up almost entirely of reservists, will take part in the month-long multi-domain warfighting and have been assigned the role of patrolling communities, waterways and critical infrastructure across the Top End.

The task group is made up of both Australian personnel and reservists from the US Coast Guard, who have shipped half-a-dozen vessels to Darwin especially for July.

Despite not being full-time, ‘chocos’ - as they’re colloquially referred to across the ADF - have a lot to offer operationally, according to 9th Brigade commander Brigadier Tim Orders.

“They have real empathy with (local) communities and bring a lot in terms of how we are able to connect and operate,” he said.

Brigadier Orders’ comments are backed by history, as it was ‘chocos’ who did the heavy lifting during the Kokoda Track campaign of 1942 - a series of battles waged in the jungle of Papua New Guinea.

Currently, the ADF’s reserve numbers remain relatively healthy at approximately 32,500.

However, the ADF have sought to expand that number and refine its quality, after a 2024 strategic review tabled 14 detailed recommendations.

One of the submissions was to extend the active commitment period of former permanent ADF personnel from five to 10 years, allowing military commanders to call-on a larger pool of troops in the event of an emergency.

It was also recommended the ADF raise an extra 1000 troops by 2030.

Australia is not the only nation putting more stock into their reserves.

This month, Commander Faith Gamboa of the US Coast Guard will lead a team - of which about 90 per cent are reservists - who hail from Clearwater, Florida.

“This is the first time a Port Security unit has ever been to Darwin, ever been to the Indian Ocean,” she said.

“So this is a big thing for the US government.”

While it is rare for the US Coast Guard to partake in a large, international military exercise, Commander Gamboa said she saw potential to test her troops in the waters of Darwin Harbour and beyond.

“(Our capability is) we can detect, defend and deter any kind of malign threat that’s in the intercoastal waterways or surrounding waters, as well as port spaces (and) critical infrastructure” she said.

“We have both a waterside security portion as well as a shore-side security portion, providing a layer defence in the port area.”

Exercise Talisman Sabre will run from 13 July to 4 August.

https://www.ntnews.com.au/news/9th-brigade-us-coast-guard-join-forces-in-30000-strong-talisman-sabre-multidomain-warfighting/news-story/5f9dedd96f5986e396e95603ad79c520

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109310

File: b262284e9656ce6⋯.jpg (225.64 KB,1000x667,1000:667,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 0a2a29432c0ef84⋯.jpg (231.27 KB,750x1114,375:557,Clipboard.jpg)

File: fef2970d673f6cb⋯.mp4 (9.13 MB,360x640,9:16,Clipboard.mp4)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23314896 (121417ZJUL25) Notable: Marine Rotational Force - Darwin Tweet: (Video) Talisman Sabre locked in - press [play] now. Talisman Sabre is the largest bilateral military exercise between Australia and the United States advancing a free and open Indo-Pacific by strengthening relationships and interoperability among key allies and partners.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109224

U.S. Marines launch Exercise Talisman Sabre 25 in Australia’s north

Capt. John Fischer - 07.11.2025

DARWIN, Australia — U.S. Marines with the Marine Rotational Force – Darwin (MRF-D) 25.3 Marine Air-Ground Task Force (MAGTF) are taking part in Exercise Talisman Sabre 25, Australia’s largest bilateral military exercise, to enhance interoperability and strengthen ties with the Australian Defence Force and U.S. Army joint forces across the Northern Territory (NT) this month.

During the exercise, which runs from July 13 to August 4, MRF-D MAGTF Marines and Sailors will execute complex operations alongside the Australian Army’s 1st Division. The training includes airfield seizures at Timber Creek, Cloncurry, and Bootu airfields; establishment of expeditionary advanced bases (EABs) and sustainment hubs; joint and combined live-fire evolutions; and continuous airspace control of the NT through MRF-D MAGTF Marines with Marine Air Control Group 38.

“Our Marines are seizing simulated key maritime terrain and enabling freedom of maneuver for allied forces,” said Col. Jason C. Armas, commanding officer of the MRF-D 25.3 MAGTF. “This exercise is Force Design 2030, in action, right now.”

Highlights include a bilateral artillery live-fire between Kilo Battery, 3rd Battalion, 11th Marine Regiment, MRF-D 25.3, and Australia’s 8th/12th Regiment at Mount Bundey Training Area, MV-22 Osprey-supported air assault operations to secure airfields deep inland, and a historic mobile command and control node enabling continuous low signature deconfliction of fires and forces in the NT battlespace. Marines are also operating the Tactical Aviation Ground Refueling System (TAGRS) to rapidly refuel joint and combined aircraft, showcasing advanced expeditionary refueling capabilities. MRF-D’s defensive cyber capabilities will also integrate with Australian and New Zealand partners to identify simulated threats during the exercise.

Exercise Talisman Sabre is designed to improve combat readiness and strengthen the long-standing alliance between the United States and Australia. More than 35,000 personnel from 19 nations are participating this year, with the U.S. Marines playing a critical role in maneuver, fires integration, logistics support, and combined command and control.

“Everything we do is predicated on trust with our allies and partners,” said Armas. That’s how we train and that’s how we really uphold security and stability in the Asia-Pacific,” Armas said.

MRF-D has been deploying to Australia annually for more than a decade as part of the U.S. Force Posture Initiatives, enhancing regional security cooperation, crisis response capability, and combined operational proficiency.

For imagery and updates from Talisman Sabre, visit:

https://www.dvidshub.net/feature/TalismanSabre25

https://www.dvidshub.net/news/542510/us-marines-launch-exercise-talisman-sabre-25-australias-north

Marine Rotational Force - Darwin Tweet

Talisman Sabre locked in — press [play] now.

Talisman Sabre is the largest bilateral military exercise between Australia and the United States advancing a free and open Indo-Pacific by strengthening relationships and interoperability among key allies and partners.

https://x.com/MRFDarwin/status/1943662313866952818

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109311

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23314941 (121431ZJUL25) Notable: Video: Talisman Sabre underway in Queensland - Talisman Sabre is underway in Brisbane as armed forces from several allied countries have arrived in Australia. Three US Navy ships have docked in Brisbane for routine maintenance, to resupply, and to give the more than 2,000 marines on board some rest and recovery ahead of the planned military drills. This year marks the 20th anniversary of Talisman Sabre and will have its largest participation so far, with more than 30,000 military personnel from 19 countries. The international training exercise will involve a month-long series of war games and live fire operations, aimed at strengthening allied military ties and improving interoperability. Events will be held in and around military bases in NSW, north and central Queensland, and Darwin, as well as in Papua New Guinea, hosted by their defence force. Talisman Sabre will begin next week following a ceremony at Sydney Harbour. - Sky News Australia

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109224

>>109283

Talisman Sabre underway in Queensland

Sky News Australia

Jul 12, 2025

Talisman Sabre is underway in Brisbane as armed forces from several allied countries have arrived in Australia.

Three US Navy ships have docked in Brisbane for routine maintenance, to resupply, and to give the more than 2,000 marines on board some rest and recovery ahead of the planned military drills.

This year marks the 20th anniversary of Talisman Sabre and will have its largest participation so far, with more than 30,000 military personnel from 19 countries.

The international training exercise will involve a month-long series of war games and live fire operations, aimed at strengthening allied military ties and improving interoperability.

Events will be held in and around military bases in NSW, north and central Queensland, and Darwin, as well as in Papua New Guinea, hosted by their defence force.

Talisman Sabre will begin next week following a ceremony at Sydney Harbour.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ML6Q36ngF58

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109312

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23314955 (121434ZJUL25) Notable: Video: Sydney Harbour will star in a military spectacle for Exercise Talisman Sabre - Sydney Harbour will star in a military spectacle for the beginning of Exercise Talisman Sabre, the biggest wargames Australia has ever hosted. - 7NEWS Australia

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109224

Sydney Harbour will star in a military spectacle for Exercise Talisman Sabre

7NEWS Australia

Jul 11, 2025

Sydney Harbour will star in a military spectacle for the beginning of Exercise Talisman Sabre, the biggest wargames Australia has ever hosted.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f0li1Cp6aLg

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109313

File: f1c083c8c6f004b⋯.jpg (1.84 MB,5766x3844,3:2,Clipboard.jpg)

File: a447220e685c169⋯.jpg (821.01 KB,3496x2331,3496:2331,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 35bb0dfd82bd66a⋯.jpg (1.08 MB,3000x2613,1000:871,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23318879 (130856ZJUL25) Notable: PM and fiancee step out in Shanghai to kick off soccer diplomacy – Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and fiancée Jodie Haydon walked The Bund with Socceroos great Kevin Muscat, now coach of Shanghai Port FC, in a bid to appeal to Xi Jinping’s love of football and strengthen personal ties ahead of formal talks. Albanese was gifted a team jersey and hailed “ambassadors” like Muscat as people-to-people links. The visit begins with tourism deals and a new “Come and Say G’Day” campaign, even as Penny Wong raised concerns with Beijing over a Chinese flotilla that conducted a live-fire drill around Australia earlier this year.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109303

>>109306

PM and fiancee step out in Shanghai to kick off soccer diplomacy

Paul Sakkal - July 12, 2025

1/2

Shanghai, China: Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and his fiancee Jodie Haydon spent the morning walking The Bund with Socceroos great Kevin Muscat, using soccer as a form of diplomacy with China.

In a bid to appeal to Chinese President Xi Jinping’s love for the world game, Albanese met with Muscat, who coaches Shanghai Port FC – a club that has been flooded with funding after Xi put forward an ambitious plan to conquer world football.

The diplomatic move to engage with Muscat before formal talks between Albanese and Xi signals Australia’s aim of strengthening the personal relationship between the two leaders to ease geopolitical tensions.

Albanese was presented with a Shanghai Port FC soccer shirt during an event with the club’s Australian coach, Muscat, at Shanghai’s famous Bund thoroughfare.

“We have a parliamentary football team [and] we’re not very good,” Albanese said, holding the jersey with the number 10 and his name on the back. “I’ll be able to wear that around Australia proudly.”

Muscat and Australians doing business in China were examples, the prime minister said, of healthy people-to-people links between the two nations.

“I’ve just been chatting about Kevin, about the fact that they are ambassadors as well,” Albanese said alongside the Huangpu river, talking up Muscat’s chances of winning another trophy with Shanghai.

Muscat replied: “That’s the idea.”

Wearing a hat bearing the logo of his own football team, the South Sydney Rabbitohs, Albanese said Australia’s trade with China was worth as much as the next four nations combined.

“That says something about how important this relationship is,” he said.

From 1994 to 2006, Muscat played as a defender for the Socceroos. He won 46 caps and scored 10 goals in that time.

In 2023, the soccer champion became the coach of Shanghai Port, and the club has since won the 2024 Chinese Super League season and the 2024 Chinese FA Cup.

Beyond soccer diplomacy, Australia complained on Friday to China about a live-fire exercise in February that disrupted flights between Sydney and New Zealand, only a day before Albanese touched down in Shanghai.

Foreign Minister Penny Wong raised Australia’s concerns about the heavily armed flotilla that circumnavigated Australia earlier this year in a meeting with Chinese counterpart Wang Yi on the sidelines of a regional meeting in Malaysia on Friday, the government confirmed.

Her expression of disapproval at the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN), a day after she warned of China’s rapid military build-up, serves as a reminder of the points of difference with Australia’s largest trading partner, even after years of calmer relations under Labor.

The emergence of a Chinese flotilla sailing around Australia’s east coast in February sparked concern in Canberra about the lack of notice of live-firing, despite the voyage being conducted in accordance with international law.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109314

File: fb662a810a6aaef⋯.jpg (139.61 KB,1280x853,1280:853,Clipboard.jpg)

File: f0d0d022d5e7af6⋯.jpg (142.39 KB,1280x960,4:3,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23318889 (130904ZJUL25) Notable: China to take more active part in promoting comprehensive strategic partnership with Australia"Over the past three years, China-Australia relations have stabilized, turned around and achieved positive results, said Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi on Friday. It proves that as long as the two countries uphold a correct positioning of their partnership, bilateral relations can develop steadily and continue to yield results. For her part, Australian Foreign Minister Penny Wong said that dialogue and cooperation between Australia and China in trade, tourism and other fields have continued to make progress, and personnel exchanges have become increasingly active. Wong said Australia supports the central role of ASEAN and is committed to maintaining regional peace and stability." – Xinhua

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109303

>>109306

>>109313

China to take more active part in promoting comprehensive strategic partnership with Australia: FM

Xinhua - 2025-07-12

KUALA LUMPUR, July 12 (Xinhua) - China is ready to promote the comprehensive strategic partnership with Australia through a more proactive approach, Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi said here on Friday.

China is willing to work with Australia to prepare for the next stage of high-level exchanges, maintain the momentum of improvement in bilateral ties and properly manage their differences, Wang said.

Wang made the remarks during a meeting with Australian Foreign Minister Penny Wong in the Malaysian capital on the sidelines of the ASEAN Foreign Ministers' Meeting and related meetings.

Over the past three years, China-Australia relations have stabilized, turned around and achieved positive results, said Wang, also a member of the Political Bureau of the Communist Party of China Central Committee.

It proves that as long as the two countries uphold a correct positioning of their partnership, bilateral relations can develop steadily and continue to yield results, Wang said.

The Chinese foreign minister noted that Australia's rational and pragmatic policy toward China serves the interests of both countries and aligns with the trend of the times.

For her part, Wong said that Australia is committed to developing a positive and pragmatic relationship with China.

Both sides are making every effort to prepare for high-level exchanges and look forward to achieving positive outcomes, she said, adding that dialogue and cooperation between Australia and China in trade, tourism and other fields have continued to make progress, and personnel exchanges have become increasingly active.

Wong noted that Australia remains firmly committed to the one-China policy and does not support "Taiwan independence."

Australia is willing to engage in candid communication and deepen cooperation with China to promote the sustained and positive development of bilateral relations, she said.

Wong said that Australia supports the central role of ASEAN and is committed to maintaining regional peace and stability.

The two sides also exchanged views on issues including the South China Sea and the Ukraine crisis.

https://english.news.cn/20250712/da547c54ed3b4cd8893f1fe7b1f85af7/c.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109315

File: cb178c576a959a2⋯.jpg (382.94 KB,2048x1365,2048:1365,Clipboard.jpg)

File: a775a1cab3059fb⋯.jpg (575.03 KB,2048x1365,2048:1365,Clipboard.jpg)

File: ab34dcb5ac9751e⋯.jpg (290.51 KB,750x836,375:418,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23318896 (130915ZJUL25) Notable: Albanese bats away questions about Taiwan and US defence demands on first day of China visit – Prime Minister Anthony Albanese, on the first full day of his China trip, dismissed pressure from the Trump administration after Elbridge Colby, leading a review of AUKUS, urged allies to say what role they’d play in a US-China war over Taiwan. Albanese insisted Australia opposed “any unilateral action” and wanted “no change in the status quo.” Acting Defence Minister Pat Conroy said only the elected government could commit Australia to war. Albanese also launched a tourism campaign in Shanghai and praised China’s economic development.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109303

>>109306

Albanese bats away questions about Taiwan and US defence demands on first day of China visit

Stephen Dziedzic and Tom Crowley - 13 July 2025

The prime minister has been forced to bat away fresh defence demands from the Trump administration on the first full day of his visit to China, insisting that Australia supports "the status quo" in regards to Taiwan.

The Financial Times reported on Saturday that senior defence official Elbridge Colby — who is leading the Trump administration's review of the AUKUS pact — was pressing both Australia and Japan to say what role they would play if the US and China went to war over Taiwan.

Mr Elbridge took to social media after the piece was published to say that Mr Trump was focused on restoring US strength, including "by urging allies to step up their defense spending and other efforts related to our collective defense".

"Of course, some among our allies might not welcome frank conversations. But many, now led by NATO after the historic Hague Summit, are seeing the urgent need to step up and are doing so," he said.

The story came at an awkward moment for Anthony Albanese, who fielded several questions on Mr Colby's comments during his visit to the commercial metropolis of Shanghai.

Mr Albanese told reporters Australia did not support "any unilateral action" on Taiwan and that its spending on both defence and aid was "about advancing peace and security in our region".

"We have a clear position and we have been consistent about that … We don't want any change in the status quo."

A separate US government source told the ABC that the US — which maintains its own policy of strategic ambiguity when it comes to the defence of Taiwan — was having a "broader conversation" with allies like Australia.

They also said Australia had rejected overtures from US officials who suggested Australia should give specific assurances to the Trump administration about how they'd deploy Virginia-class submarines acquired through the AUKUS pact in the event of the US going to war.

Asked whether the US was entitled to seek assurance about an Australian response to a war over Taiwan, given its own position of strategic ambiguity, Mr Albanese did not answer directly but said the question answered itself.

Earlier, acting Defence Minister Pat Conroy told the ABC's Insiders on Sunday Australia did not "engage in hypotheticals" and would make its own decisions in response to any conflict.

"The sole power to commit Australia to war, or to allow our territory to be used for a conflict, is the elected government of the day," he said.

"Sovereignty will always be prioritised and that will continue to be our position."

Tourism focus of first leg

Mr Albanese has tried to use the first leg of his visit to highlight the human links between Australia and China, going for a walk down Shanghai's famous waterfront with ex-Socceroo Kevin Muscat, who is the manager for high-profile local soccer club Shanghai Port FC.

After that, he launched a new "chapter" of a major Australian tourism campaign designed to coax more Chinese visitors back to Australia, who have returned to Australia more slowly than expected in the wake of COVID-19 travel bans.

He also met Shanghai Party Chairman Chen Jining, where he praised China's rapid economic development.

"The development we can see across the river is symbolic of the extraordinary development that China has seen in recent decades, lifting literally hundreds of millions out of poverty," he said.

Mr Albanese told the chair that Australia wanted to engage in "frank and constructive dialogue" to promote "stability" in the region.

"We deal with each other in a calm and consistent manner, and we want to continue to pursue our national interests," he said.

"And it's in our interests to have good relations with China."

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-07-13/albanese-taiwan-us-defence-demands-china-visit/105526626

https://x.com/USDPColby/status/1944045317227151579

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109316

File: e4af567879bb625⋯.jpg (488.52 KB,2399x1596,2399:1596,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23318907 (130927ZJUL25) Notable: US demands to know what allies would do in event of war over Taiwan – The Pentagon is pressing Australia and Japan to clarify their roles in a possible US-China war over Taiwan, a move that has unsettled both allies. Elbridge Colby, under-secretary of defence for policy, has urged commitments despite Washington’s own “strategic ambiguity.” A US official said the aim was “to intensify and accelerate efforts to strengthen deterrence,” insisting “we do not seek war.” Japan called the request “difficult to answer” and Australia declined comment. Observers said it was unrealistic for the US to demand clarity when President Trump has not committed to Taiwan’s defence.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109303

>>109306

>>109315

US demands to know what allies would do in event of war over Taiwan

Trump administration says it is trying to prevent war but raises eyebrows by calling for commitments from Australia and Japan

Demetri Sevastopulo - 12 July 2025

1/2

The Pentagon is pressing Japan and Australia to make clear what role they would play if the US and China went to war over Taiwan, in an effort that has frustrated the two most important American allies in the Indo-Pacific.

Elbridge Colby, under-secretary of defence for policy, has been pushing the issue in meetings with Japanese and Australian defence officials in recent months, said five people familiar with the discussions.

The push is his latest effort to convince US allies in the Indo-Pacific to enhance deterrence and prepare for a potential war over Taiwan.

After publication, Colby wrote on X that the Pentagon was implementing President Donald Trump’s agenda of “restoring deterrence and achieving peace through strength”. He said that included “urging allies to step up their defence spending and other efforts related to our collective defence”.

A US defence official said the “animating theme” of the discussions with allies was “to intensify and accelerate efforts to strengthen deterrence in a balanced, equitable way”.

The US official added: “We do not seek war. Nor do we seek to dominate China itself. What we are doing is ensuring the United States and its allies have the military strength to underwrite diplomacy and guarantee peace.”

The talks include efforts to persuade allies to raise defence spending amid rising concern about China’s threat to Taiwan. But the request for commitments related to a war over the island is a new demand from the US.

“Concrete operational planning and exercises that have direct application to a Taiwan contingency are moving forward with Japan and Australia,” said one person. “But this request caught Tokyo and Canberra by surprise because the US itself does not give a blank cheque guarantee to Taiwan.”

The US has long had a policy of “strategic ambiguity” under which it does not say if it would defend the island. Former president Joe Biden on four occasions deviated from that, saying the US would intervene. But Donald Trump has echoed other presidents in refusing to say what he would do.

Zack Cooper, an Asia expert at the American Enterprise Institute, said: “It is very difficult to get allies to provide specifics about what they would do in a Taiwan conflict when they don’t know either the scenario’s context or America’s own response.”

“President Trump has not committed to defend Taiwan, so it is unrealistic for the US to insist on clear commitments from others.”

The push has been aimed at Japanese and Australian defence officials, and not higher levels. A second person said there was a “collective raising of eyebrows” from representatives in Japan, Australia and other US allies.

Japan’s defence ministry said it was “difficult to answer the hypothetical question of a ‘Taiwan emergency’.” It said any response would “be implemented on an individual and specific basis in accordance with the constitution, international law, and domestic laws and regulations”.

The Australian embassy in the US did not comment.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109317

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23318920 (130938ZJUL25) Notable: Video: US review of AUKUS incomplete as cost of defence boost revealed – Acting Defence Minister Pat Conroy said the Trump administration’s review of AUKUS, led by Elbridge Colby, has missed its 30-day deadline but expressed confidence it would back the pact. He acknowledged pressure on Australia to raise defence spending, with budget office figures showing a jump to 3.5% of GDP could cost $287b over a decade. Conroy said aid and diplomacy also bolster security, insisting “sovereignty will always be prioritised” and that only the elected government can commit Australia to war, amid reports the US sought assurances on how Australia would respond in a Taiwan conflict.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109299

>>109306

>>109315

US review of AUKUS incomplete as cost of defence boost revealed

Tom Crowley - 13 July 2025

The Trump administration's review of the AUKUS partnership is unfinished as its slated deadline arrives, according to Australia's acting defence minister.

Patrick Conroy told the ABC's Insiders the Australian government was "engaging at the most senior levels" and was optimistic the US review would endorse the military pact.

"I'm confident it will support AUKUS just as our review of AUKUS [and] the UK review found," he said.

"There's been lots of speculation about what the timeframe is of the review … My last information is that the review has not been completed yet."

The review, led by senior Pentagon official Elbridge Colby whose public statements about AUKUS have been mixed, was slated to be finished within 30 days, a timeframe reached this weekend which coincides with Anthony Albanese's visit to China.

Bracing for pressure on defence spending

Despite the statements of confidence, the government is bracing for the likelihood that the Trump administration will press harder on Australia to lift its defence spending, as it did with European partners.

The ABC can reveal new figures laying out the colossal budget impact of agreeing to such a request.

During the election campaign, the Parliamentary Budget Office estimated the short-term boost to defence spending needed to achieve 3 per cent of GDP by 2035, as was Coalition policy, would cost $20.6 billion over the first five years and $156.4 billion over a decade.

Those figures, prepared in consultation with Treasury and Defence, can be extended to suggest the even larger cost of a 3.5 per cent spend of $45.2 billion over five years or $287.1 billion over a decade.

The government currently intends to increase defence spending to 2.3 per cent of GDP by 2035.

To get to 3.5 per cent instead, the extra funding alone would triple Australia's entire foreign aid budget by the year 2029-30.

Mr Conroy told the ABC the government would seek to emphasise that its aid and diplomatic spending, especially in the Pacific region, was also contributing to security.

"We're making the point to everyone that both [defence and aid spending] are incredibly important," he said.

"We're investing in our relationships in the region, as well as our military capability and we are increasing our defence budget significantly, $57 billion above the previous trajectory," he said.

"We've made it clear that if a case is made for more capability, we'll increase more. We're not going to pluck a figure out of the air and work out how to spend it. That's what the Coalition took to the election."

Mr Conroy, who is acting for Richard Marles in the defence portfolio but whose regular portfolio is defence industry, said Australia was also trying to get more value for money from defence procurement processes.

"It's a challenging area for every country around the world [and] it was problematic under the last government … We've made significant reforms to how we do defence procurement," he said.

"It is important that taxpayers have confidence that every single dollar goes to improving capability of the Australian Defence Force as well as supporting the 100,000 Australians who work in that industry."

'Sovereignty' central amid reports of Taiwan request

Mr Conroy said Australia would not "engage in hypotheticals" after a report in the Financial Times that Mr Colby was also pressing both Australia and Japan to give assurances about how they would respond in the event of a war with China over Taiwan.

In a social media post following that report, Mr Colby did not address Taiwan directly but said the Pentagon had "made abundantly and consistently clear" it wanted allies to "step up their defense spending and other efforts related to our collective defense.

"This has been a hallmark of President Trump's strategy in Asia as in Europe where it has already been tremendously successful," he said, describing the pressure on NATO allies to spend more as a "formula" for other regions.

"Of course, some among our allies might not welcome frank conversations. But many... are seeing the urgent need to step up and are doing so."

Mr Conroy told the ABC Australia would make its own decisions about any conflict.

"The sole power to commit Australia to war or to allow our territory to be used for a conflict is the elected government of the day," he said.

"Sovereignty will always be prioritised and that will continue to be our position."

Officials have also emphasised Australia's strategic focus on deterrence and opposition to the use of force.

"We are being very clear that we want a balanced region where no-one is dominated and no-one dominates," he said.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-07-13/us-review-of-aukus-incomplete-defence-cost/105526330

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GjYuW19XOww

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109318

File: 09cbf2a2e6052e2⋯.jpg (745.79 KB,2048x1366,1024:683,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23318940 (130952ZJUL25) Notable: US wants to know how Australia would use subs if America goes to war – The Pentagon has confirmed it is seeking undertakings from Australia on how AUKUS nuclear-powered submarines would be deployed “across different scenarios,” while also pressing for “substantial increases” in defence spending. US Undersecretary of Defence Elbridge Colby said allies must “step up” commitments, including on Taiwan, as part of Donald Trump’s “peace through strength” agenda. Acting Defence Minister Pat Conroy stressed sovereignty, saying Australia “doesn’t discuss hypotheticals” and that only the government of the day can commit forces. The review of AUKUS also examines command structure, US shipbuilding capacity and asset posture.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109299

>>109306

>>109315

US wants to know how Australia would use subs if America goes to war

Michael Koziol - July 13, 2025

1/2

Washington: The Pentagon has confirmed it is asking Australia for undertakings on how its AUKUS submarines would be used in the event of US military conflicts, and for “substantial increases” in defence spending as part of its review of the $368 billion agreement.

A senior US defence official, who requested anonymity to speak freely, said the Trump administration wanted a clear idea of how Australia would deploy the nuclear-powered boats in the event of a contingency, though this was much broader than conflict with China over Taiwan.

“There’s a conversation about command structure, about alignment of assets. We would want, in any scenario, a clear sense of what we can expect from Australia,” he said in an interview.

“There seems to be a hyper-emphasis on Taiwan in public reporting. But this is broader than any one particular contingency. It is about how we can reasonably expect these kinds of critical assets to be allocated across different scenarios.”

This masthead can also reveal that the Pentagon’s AUKUS review focuses on four areas: command structure, the US’s capacity to produce the boats, posture (positioning) of the assets and Australian defence spending.

Meanwhile, US Undersecretary of Defence Elbridge Colby, who is heading the review, publicly confirmed reports that the US wanted its allies such as Australia and Japan to “step up” and make commitments about how they would act in the event of a conflict.

Colby said the Pentagon was implementing US President Donald Trump’s commonsense agenda of restoring deterrence and achieving peace through strength.

“That includes by urging allies to step up their defence spending and other efforts related to our collective defence,” he said, noting it also applied in both Europe and Asia.

“Of course, some among our allies might not welcome frank conversations. But many, now led by NATO after the historic Hague summit, are seeing the urgent need to step up and are doing so. President Trump has shown the approach and the formula – and we will not be deterred from advancing his agenda.”

Colby was responding to a report in the Financial Times, published on Saturday US time, that said he had been pressing the issue in meetings with Australia and Japan, citing five sources familiar with the discussions.

This masthead revealed on Thursday that Colby believed Australia should give a public declaration or private guarantee that the US-made nuclear-powered submarines would be used in a possible conflict with China.

Defence Industry Minister Pat Conroy said on Sunday that Australia prioritised its sovereignty and “we don’t discuss hypotheticals”.

“The decision to commit Australian troops to a conflict will be made by the government of the day, not in advance, but by the government of the day,” he told ABC’s Insiders program.

Under the AUKUS agreement, Australia would buy several Virginia-class nuclear submarines from the US and then develop its own fleet with the United Kingdom. The Trump administration is reviewing the deal, brokered by former leaders Joe Biden, Scott Morrison and Boris Johnson, to determine whether it puts “America First”.

The senior US defence official said the review was being done “in good faith” and the Pentagon “would like to make this thing work as best we can, consistent with President Trump’s agenda”.

He pushed back against the characterisation of Colby, in both Australia and the US, as an AUKUS sceptic. Colby was “in many ways a moderate on AUKUS” who was “trying to do this thing in a prudential manner”.

And he warned: “There are folks that are very powerful and very important stakeholders who have very serious concerns privately [about AUKUS].”

The official also confirmed the question of Australian defence spending was tied up in the AUKUS discussions, though he declined to say if the Pentagon sought a further injection of money into the US submarine industrial base. Australia is already contributing $4.7 billion.

“Substantial increases in Australian defence spending, I think, are quite warranted,” the official said. US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth has already told Australian Defence Minister Richard Marles the US wants Australia to increase its defence spending to 3.5 per cent of GDP, from a little over 2 per cent.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109319

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23318962 (131007ZJUL25) Notable: Video: LIVE | Talisman Sabre 2025 Kicks Off: US, Australia Lead Massive War Games - The opening ceremony of Talisman Sabre 2025 marked the start of the largest-ever iteration of the Australia-U.S. joint military exercise, now including 19 participating nations. The multinational war games are designed to strengthen interoperability, readiness, and regional security cooperation across land, sea, air, and cyber domains. Held in Queensland, Australia, the opening event featured military leaders and defense personnel from across the Indo-Pacific, delivering statements on the strategic importance of allied unity and rapid response capability in a shifting global security landscape. A joint press conference followed the ceremonial events, with remarks from representatives of the Australian Defence Force, the U.S. Indo-Pacific Command, and high-ranking officials from countries including Japan, South Korea, France, the U.K., Indonesia, and more. The exercise spans several weeks and includes amphibious landings, live-fire drills, cyber-defense simulations, and complex combat operations, underscoring growing defense ties among democratic allies in the Indo-Pacific. - APT

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109224

LIVE | Talisman Sabre 2025 Kicks Off: US, Australia Lead Massive War Games

APT

Jul 13, 2025'

The opening ceremony of Talisman Sabre 2025 marked the start of the largest-ever iteration of the Australia-U.S. joint military exercise, now including 19 participating nations. The multinational war games are designed to strengthen interoperability, readiness, and regional security cooperation across land, sea, air, and cyber domains.

Held in Queensland, Australia, the opening event featured military leaders and defense personnel from across the Indo-Pacific, delivering statements on the strategic importance of allied unity and rapid response capability in a shifting global security landscape.

A joint press conference followed the ceremonial events, with remarks from representatives of the Australian Defence Force, the U.S. Indo-Pacific Command, and high-ranking officials from countries including Japan, South Korea, France, the U.K., Indonesia, and more.

The exercise spans several weeks and includes amphibious landings, live-fire drills, cyber-defense simulations, and complex combat operations, underscoring growing defense ties among democratic allies in the Indo-Pacific.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qO9f_ws2Dyo

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109320

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23318968 (131012ZJUL25) Notable: Talisman Sabre Tweets: - We have reached the end of the Australian component of EXTS25 as activities now move to Papua New Guinea. This is the first time that a component of Exercise Talisman Sabre has been hosted outside of Australia and will conclude with a closing ceremony on 4 August. We thank all those who have participated to date and supported Talisman Sabre 25 and we look forward to seeing you all at Talisman Sabre 27. #ts25 #talismansabre #talismansabre25 #YourADF #StrongerTogether

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109224

>>109225

>>109226

>>109227

Talisman Sabre 2025: Australia is prepared for Chinese spies off our coast

7NEWS Australia

Jul 13, 2025

Australia is prepared for Chinese spies off our coast as troops take part in the biggest military exercises on home soil.

Allies from around the world have been deployed for Talisman Sabre and military rivals are watching on.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Hyhg9cetCw

>Talisman Sabre

MAGIC SWORD

https://qalerts.pub/?q=Operation+Specialists

https://qalerts.pub/?q=magic

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109321

File: a7ebe19d92abe5d⋯.jpg (3.1 MB,3000x2000,3:2,Clipboard.jpg)

File: cc80945f4dade54⋯.jpg (3.16 MB,3000x2000,3:2,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23323820 (140909ZJUL25) Notable: Albanese walks trade-security tightrope before Xi meeting – Prime Minister Anthony Albanese vowed to return the Port of Darwin to Australian hands despite Chinese displeasure, saying “we want the port to go into Australian ownership.” Speaking in Shanghai ahead of his Beijing talks with Xi Jinping and Premier Li Qiang, Albanese promoted Australia as a free-trade nation while stressing peace in the Indo-Pacific underpins economic ties. Mining magnate Andrew “Twiggy” Forrest warned that “security becomes a distraction” to $312bn in annual trade. Albanese, joined by executives from Rio Tinto, BHP and Fortescue, also promoted “green steel” cooperation while declining to reveal planned security or rights discussions with Xi.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109306

>>109315

Albanese walks trade-security tightrope before Xi meeting

Paul Sakkal - July 14, 2025

Shanghai: Australia will not back down on its decision to take the Port of Darwin out of Chinese hands as mining magnate Andrew “Twiggy” Forrest warns that an overemphasis on security risks is hurting the $312 billion in annual trade between the two nations.

As Albanese prepares for a grand welcome at his meeting with Xi Jinping in Beijing on Tuesday, the final day of his two-day stop in Shanghai was centred on Australia’s financial ties with its biggest trading partner.

The Prime Minister spruiked Australia as a stable, open trading nation against a backdrop of US President Donald Trump’s stop-start trade wars.

“I think that Australia’s support for free and fair trade does provide potential opportunities for Australia in this region as well, not just with China, but with ASEAN nations,” Albanese said, without naming the president.

Trade will be central to Albanese’s talks with Xi and Chinese Premier Li Qiang – who famously referred to Albanese as a “handsome boy” in 2023 – on Tuesday. But disagreements are likely to make the agenda, including China’s frustration with Australia’s decision to force a Chinese firm to end its lease over the Port of Darwin due to security concerns.

Albanese said his government would not be deterred when asked if he believed China might retaliate against the move because Chinese-owned firm Landbridge has leased the asset since 2015.

“The answer to that is no,” the prime minister said at a press conference in Shanghai’s Peninsula Hotel.

“We had a very clear position that we want the port to go into Australian ownership. We’ve been very clear about it … and we will go through that process.”

Albanese said he was solely focused on his trip to China when asked if he was closer to securing a meeting with Trump, noting that previous Liberal prime ministers Tony Abbott and Malcolm Fraser had met with Chinese leaders before seeing their US counterparts.

Albanese suggested the Australian media had lost perspective in its coverage of his not having met with Trump.

The port dispute, which has received significant negative attention in Chinese state media, reflects the depth of worry in Australia’s intelligence community about China having control of critical infrastructure. Putting the port back in Australian hands would be achieved by encouraging Landbridge to sell the asset or to force its divestment, a move that would trigger further Chinese displeasure.

Albanese declined to reveal what security or human rights he would discuss with Xi. He trumpeted his record of securing freedom for detained Australians when asked about Chinese-Australian pro-democracy activist Yang Hengjun, who is in prison after being given a suspended death sentence on murky espionage offences.

Billions in iron ore revenue for Australia’s strained budget would be safeguarded by stripping the use of coal out of the production of steel, Albanese said while flanked by the heads of the country’s largest miners. Before his press conference, the prime minister convened a roundtable with Chinese and Australian resources executives on so-called green steel.

Fortescue mining billionaire Forrest, a long-time advocate of closer links with China, said worries about national security clouded the business relationship between the two nations.

“Yes, security becomes a distraction,” Forrest said.

“We have people [in China] that want a peaceful, long-term relationship with Australia. Across Australia, we have people who want a peaceful, long-term relationship with China. The prime minister has brought us into the realm of that peaceful, long-term relationship.”

Forrest’s remarks came a day after the US made clear it wanted to know how Australia would act in a potential war with China over Taiwan.

Albanese said maintaining peace in the Indo-Pacific, which he said on Sunday was the purpose of the AUKUS submarine pact, would create the conditions for stronger economic ties.

“The economic relationship is obviously based upon a stable and secure region. We’ve seen the disruption that occurs when there is conflict in the world. That’s why we need to make sure that we do everything we can to promote peace and security in the region,” Albanese said.

https://www.smh.com.au/politics/federal/albanese-walks-trade-security-tightrope-before-xi-meeting-20250714-p5mepo.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109322

File: 723f06d1871cab1⋯.mp4 (3.45 MB,640x360,16:9,Clipboard.mp4)

File: a3a8c350147a361⋯.jpg (2.12 MB,4138x2229,4138:2229,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 1cacdeacdc2dbc5⋯.jpg (211.26 KB,750x881,750:881,Clipboard.jpg)

File: d9040f6e503e6a2⋯.mp4 (9.36 MB,720x480,3:2,Clipboard.mp4)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23323852 (140935ZJUL25) Notable: Video: Masked figure claims responsibility for anti-Israel firebombing, threatens weapons workers – A masked figure in a video claimed responsibility for the July 5 firebombing of weapons manufacturer Lovitt Technologies in Greensborough, Victoria, and threatened further violence against its workers. Police said the four-minute video, filmed before a Palestinian flag, is being reviewed by the Victorian Joint Counter Terrorism Team. The man used voice-altering software, warned employees he had their addresses, and demonstrated how to firebomb cars. Victoria’s Police Minister Anthony Carbines condemned the threats as incitement to violence, while Jewish leaders likened the group to “an al-Qa’ida terror cell.”

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109251

>>109253

>>109268

Masked figure claims responsibility for anti-Israel firebombing, threatens weapons workers

RYAN BOURKE - 14 July 2025

A video circulating online shows a masked figure taking responsibility for the firebombing of a Victorian-owned weapons manufacturer, and threatening to target its workers with further violence.

Victoria Police has launched an investigation into the July 5 incident.

“Investigators are aware of a video which has been circulating where a group has claimed responsibility for the incident,” a police spokesperson said.

“This video is being reviewed as part of the ongoing investigation … Police are urging anyone with information about the Greensborough incident and those involved to come forward.”

In the four-minute video that began circulating on Sunday night, a black-clad man wearing a balaclava in front of a Palestinian flag uses voice-altering software to tell viewers “This is an anonymous communique by the cell that torched three cars at Lovitt Technologies”.

The figure then threatens further “consequences” if the company continues to manufacture weapons, and instructs viewers how to conduct firebombings of their own, adding that workers should “consider this as a warning”.

After explaining the company’s link to the manufacturing of Israeli weapons, the figure warned workers at the company they have had “years to contemplate the consequences of your actions”.

“We will decide your fate as you have decided the fate of millions … for the past few months we have been watching you, we have your addresses.

“All of the information we have about you will be distributed to our underground networks.”

The video then shows the figure demonstrating how to firebomb a car using paper bags and fire starters.

“Place one bag under the front and one under the back tyre … be mindful of fingerprints and DNA.”

The alarming threat comes after five hooded offenders were captured on CCTV entering Lovitt Technologies Australia on Para Rd, Greensborough just before 4am on Saturday, July 5. Police allege the offenders then set fire to three vehicles and used spray paint to write various slogans on the cars and on a building wall.

The attack remains under investigation by the Victorian Joint Counter Terrorism Team, which includes personnel from Victoria Police, the Australian Federal Police and the Australian Security Intelligence Organisation.

The video was posted to X by the Australian Jewish Association at roughly 10.30pm on Sunday.

AJA chief Robert Gregory said: “It was sent to us by a concerned member of the Jewish community who came across it on a social media page of anti-Israel activists.”

A search of Instagram revealed several accounts with anti-Israel posts began sharing the video around 7pm, although the original source of the video remains unknown.

Acting Premier Jaclyn Symes said she had only “just been briefed” about the video when asked about it on Monday afternoon.

“I’ll have a look when I get back in the car, I’m sure it’s been referred to the Police.

“When it comes to acting on hate and inappropriate conduct in this state we are a government that has acted,” she added.

Asked if he considered the video an incitement to violence, Police Minister Anthony Carbines said, “Those matters stand condemned, should be called out, should be referred to Victoria Police.

Mr Carbines added the government’s new anti-vilification laws would “give police the tools they need to hold offenders to account who think they can incite violence, threaten people, scare people, and vilify people”.

“They’ll meet the full force of the law.”

Speaking to The Australian, Executive Council of Australian Jewry co-chief executive Alex Ryvchin said: “Seeing a group resembling an al-Qa’ida terror cell openly pledging to carry out criminal acts is chilling and disturbing.”

“Today it is a business they oppose and tomorrow it will be individuals, politicians, journalists or religious institutions they deem impure,” Mr Ryvchin said.

“We expect this incident to be investigated and for those responsible to be met with the law. If we fail to confront this threat we risk becoming a nation of competing violent extremists and not a society under the rule of law.”

Lovitt Technologies has been contacted for comment.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/masked-figure-claims-responsibility-for-antiisrael-firebombing-threatens-weapons-workers/news-story/fb14d553b704871dc02ecbb669fdebc6

https://www.theage.com.au/national/anonymous-group-claims-responsibility-for-attack-on-israel-linked-military-parts-maker-20250714-p5meth.html

https://x.com/AustralianJA/status/1944371884612567466

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109323

File: d3fee581815f463⋯.jpg (258.47 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23328908 (151221ZJUL25) Notable: AUKUS sceptic Turnbull discussed pact’s defects with Pentagon policy chief Elbridge Colby – Former prime minister Malcolm Turnbull has held extensive talks with US Undersecretary of Defence Elbridge Colby about AUKUS, with both men voicing doubts over Australia’s ability to fund the pact and America’s capacity to supply Virginia-class submarines. Colby reposted a 2024 Turnbull article warning of a looming submarine gap, noting the US could not “prudently reduce” its most vital assets. Turnbull has since warned AUKUS would “considerably” reduce Australian sovereignty, arguing allies must “do more to defend themselves” and protect “sovereign autonomy.”

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>73633 (pb)

>>73441 (pb)

>>73609 (pb)

>>109316

AUKUS sceptic Turnbull discussed pact’s defects with Pentagon policy chief Elbridge Colby

JOE KELLY - 15 July 2025

1/2

Malcolm Turnbull held substantial conversations with Elbridge Colby about the AUKUS agreement – including its defects and challenges – before the Pentagon policy chief was charged with leading a vital review into the future of the security partnership.

The engagement between the former prime minister and Mr Colby predates the confirmation of Mr Colby in March as the US Undersecretary of Defence for Policy, where he serves as the key intellectual force behind the Pentagon’s application of Donald Trump’s “America First” agenda in the world – including the Indo-Pacific.

Mr Turnbull has been a sustained critic of AUKUS, arguing that the deal will not work for Australia, and he shares with Mr Colby a range of concerns and criticisms about the agreement.

The Australian can reveal the former prime minister has engaged with Mr Colby for more than three years on a range of issues including the trilateral security partnership between Australia, the US and the UK under which Canberra is hoping to acquire three Virginia-class submarines from America.

The two men know each other well and in March 2024 an opinion piece written by Mr Turnbull – warning that Australia faced the prospect of having no submarine capability for a decade because of the AUKUS deal – was reposted by Mr Colby.

Responding to the article, Mr Colby said “America cannot prudently reduce the number of its most important asset for a Western Pacific fight, precisely in the period when such a war seems increasingly plausible”.

Discussions between the two men in recent years are understood to have canvassed a range of topics about which Mr Turnbull has spoken in recent weeks – including the need for Australia to reclaim greater sovereignty and independence in world affairs by standing more firmly on its own two feet.

The US is becoming increasingly concerned that Australian defence spending – at about 2 per cent of GDP – is insufficient to fund the AUKUS agreement for the purchase of Virginia-class submarines without hollowing out other defence capabilities needed for Australia to contribute effectively to stability in the Indo-Pacific.

Another key concern held by both men relates to the US production rate for Virginia-class submarines falling behind what is required for Washington to meet both its own needs and those of Australia.

This is critical because, under the enabling AUKUS legislation, the US President cannot authorise the sale of submarines to Australia unless he can certify to congress that it will not degrade the capabilities of the US Navy.

Delivering the Jeff Bleich Centre Distinguished Lecture in late June, Mr Turnbull sketched out these points in detail.

And he mentioned Mr Colby by name.

“These are really the best, the most important assets in their fleet … Their current rate of production is, according to the navy, (running at an) average of 1.1 a year. It’s been between 1.1 and 1.2 for quite a while, it needs to be well over two to be able to meet the US Navy’s needs and our needs,” Mr Turnbull said.

“This is the point that has been of great concern to many people in Washington, including the Under Secretary for Defence, ‘Bridge’ Colby, who is undertaking a review of AUKUS at the moment.

“He has simply made the point, ‘if these are the most valuable assets in our navy … if we are already short of them and if we are producing half as many of them as we need to replace retirements, how can we possibly transfer any of these vital assets to another country, no matter how friendly and fond we may be of that nation?’”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109324

File: 158e1322fc115d7⋯.jpg (503.47 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23328949 (151232ZJUL25) Notable: Elbridge Colby’s three key challenges for Australia – US defence policy chief Elbridge Colby is pressing Australia on three fronts: whether AUKUS still aligns with Donald Trump’s priorities, if Canberra will pre-commit US-supplied submarines to a Taiwan conflict despite America’s own “strategic ambiguity,” and lifting defence spending. Colby warned that “Taiwan’s fall would be a disaster for American interests” and has tied his review of AUKUS to questions over submarine use. Posting online, he said “central to President Trump’s commonsense, America First message is that our alliances have to be fair and equitable for them to be sustainable.”

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109315

>>109318

>>109316

Elbridge Colby’s three key challenges for Australia

JOE KELLY - 15 July 2025

1/2

Elbridge Colby is issuing a challenge to the direction of Australian strategic policy, from defence spending levels and the future of the AUKUS agreement to the prospect of Australian involvement in a potential US conflict against China in the Taiwan Strait.

The US defence policy chief is swiftly emerging as one of the most important figures in the Trump administration and the intellectual engine behind the application of the “America First” agenda to US defence policy – including in the Indo-Pacific.

This makes the US Undersecretary of Defence for Policy one of the central people for Australia to engage with as Canberra navigates the relationship with the administration at a time of global uncertainty and turbulence.

But it may not be an easy road ahead. One of Colby’s key goals is to ensure more equal burden sharing when it comes to the management of America’s key alliance partnerships – and there are three key issues where he is presenting challenges.

The first is on AUKUS. As the leader of the Pentagon’s comprehensive review of the security partnership, Colby is examining whether the agreement still aligns with the priorities being championed by the US President.

While the review was not launched with the aim of killing off the agreement, there is an expectation there will be “tough” conversations. The prospect of modifications being proposed is clearly on the table.

There will be extensive engagement with both Australia and the UK over the future of AUKUS, but it would be wrong to assume that only champions of the agreement will be granted an audience with the Pentagon’s policy chief.

Colby will be listening to the full contest of ideas – and this means hearing the case presented by sceptics of the AUKUS agreement.

Nothing should be taken for granted.

The second challenge for Australia posed by Colby is his focus on how Canberra approaches China and, more specifically, whether it is willing to pre-commit US-supplied submarines to a potential American conflict with China over Taiwan.

It is true that Colby has asked this question of Australian officials, but this imposes an unreasonable demand on Canberra that, if accepted, would compromise sovereign Australian decision-making.

Even the US maintains a policy of strategic ambiguity in respect of Taiwan, and Donald Trump himself has made clear he will “never say” what course of action he would take.

Unless Washington drops this approach for a hard and fast security guarantee to Taiwan, no credible Australian government could provide an answer one way or the other.

This point has been reflected to the administration. Yet it is worth noting Colby’s statements to his confirmation hearing in March that one of his top priorities is preparing the US to mount a successful operation in defence of Taiwan if required.

“Taiwan’s fall would be a disaster for American interests,” he said. “It is vital for us to focus and enable our own forces for an effective and reasonable defence of Taiwan.

“We have to have the military capabilities in Asia or relevant to Asia to be able to conduct a local defence of Taiwan at a cost and level of risk that the American people are prepared to tolerate.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109325

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23328979 (151242ZJUL25) Notable: Video: Thorny issues broached as Albanese, Xi go head-to-head – Prime Minister Anthony Albanese raised concerns with Chinese President Xi Jinping over February’s live-fire drills off Australia’s coast, securing a commitment that Beijing would provide more notice in future. He also pressed China on Taiwan, reaffirming “no unilateral change to the status quo,” and raised the case of detained writer Yang Hengjun, though without expectation of progress. Mr Xi hailed the “recovered” relationship, calling for “equal treatment” and “mutually beneficial co-operation.” Tuesday’s meetings with Xi, Premier Li Qiang and Communist Party Chairman Zhao Leji formed the centrepiece of Albanese’s six-day China tour.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109306

>>109315

>>109321

Thorny issues broached as Albanese, Xi go head-to-head

Jacob Shteyman and Dominic Giannini - July 15 2025

Anthony Albanese has used a meeting with Chinese President Xi Jinping to raise concerns over China's lack of notice before it conducted military drills off the Australian coast.

The live firing exercise in international waters near Australia in February, which forced the diversion of commercial flights, was among topics on the agenda during talks between the two leaders in Beijing.

Speaking after Tuesday's meeting, Mr Albanese said he had secured a commitment for China to better inform Australia on military drills in the region.

The prime minister noted the drills being in international waters didn't contravene international law "but that we were concerned about the notice and the way that it happened, including the live fire exercises".

Australia's position on there being no unilateral change to the status quo over Taiwan was also conveyed to the president, he said.

"We want peace and security in the region, that is in the interests of both Australia and China," Mr Albanese replied when asked whether he had raised China's unprecedented military build up.

Mr Xi didn't raise reports the United States had asked Australia to commit to teaming up during a potential conflict with China over Taiwan, nor Labor's commitment to terminate a Chinese company's lease of the Port of Darwin, Mr Albanese added.

The prime minister also raised the detention of Australian writer Yang Hengjun but said he didn't expect immediate progress on the case.

Dr Yang was given a suspended death sentence in China on secretive national security charges that Australia rejects.

"I raised the case, you wouldn't expect there to be an immediate outcome and that is not the way things work," Mr Albanese told reporters.

In his opening remarks ahead of the meeting, Mr Xi hailed improved relations with Australia.

The president was all smiles as he greeted his Australian guest in the East Hall - one of the many ornate chambers in the Great Hall of the People.

"The most important thing we can learn from this is that a commitment to equal treatment, to seeking common ground while sharing differences, pursuing mutually beneficial co-operation, for our countries and peoples," he said.

China's president pointed to past meetings as "in-depth discussions on the strategic overarching issues critical to the direction of China-Australia relations"

"With joint efforts from both sides the China-Australia relationship has recovered from the setback and turned around," Mr Xi said.

Tuesday's bilateral meetings with President Xi, Premier Li Qiang and Communist Party Chairman Zhao Leji - the three highest-ranking members of China's ruling committee - mark the centrepiece of Mr Albanese's six-day tour of the Middle Kingdom.

With China and Australia's comprehensive strategic partnership entering its second decade, Mr Xi said he was ready to push the relationship further to reap greater benefits for both peoples.

The meeting comes as the Chinese-Australian free trade agreement passes its 10th anniversary.

Co-operation between the two nations has increased following a falling out during the COVID-19 pandemic.

An article by a Chinese state media influencer suggested Beijing could restrict Australian imports as retaliation, risking financial blowback for Australian companies.

It comes as Chinese security officials tried to stop Australian journalists, who were travelling with the prime minister's delegation, from leaving a tourist attraction in Beijing after filming in the area.

The group of reporters had permission to film at the location, but were stopped by security officials and were told to hand over footage before police arrived.

The journalists were able to leave the site with the footage, despite being followed by security.

https://www.canberratimes.com.au/story/9016725/thorny-issues-broached-as-albanese-xi-go-head-to-head/

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oO-GWpQ19ek

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109326

File: 3704db69d6a3164⋯.jpg (1.12 MB,3750x2500,3:2,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 8647037f6955453⋯.jpg (389.05 KB,1638x2048,819:1024,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 3123587ae87adab⋯.jpg (273.13 KB,1638x2048,819:1024,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 2a576d6ce4fcfd4⋯.jpg (278.27 KB,1638x2048,819:1024,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23328999 (151248ZJUL25) Notable: Australian concerns over live fire drill brushed aside in Xi meeting – Prime Minister Anthony Albanese raised February’s live-fire drills off Australia’s coast with Chinese President Xi Jinping in Beijing, stressing concern over “the notice and the ways that it happened.” Mr Xi replied that China conducted exercises “just as Australia engages in exercises.” Albanese also pressed the case of detained Australian writer Yang Hengjun, though he said outcomes would take “patient, calibrated advocacy.” Xi hailed a turnaround in ties after a “setback,” while Albanese emphasised trade and stability. The Chinese Foreign Ministry called for both nations to uphold multilateralism, free trade and international law.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109325

Australian concerns over live fire drill brushed aside in Xi meeting

Tom Crowley - 15 July 2025

President Xi Jinping appears to have brushed aside Australia's concerns about the lack of notice given by China ahead of a Chinese military exercise off the Australian coastline earlier this year.

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese told reporters his meeting with the Chinese leader, held in Beijing on Tuesday, was "constructive" and that he had raised the live fire drill in a manner consistent with his previous public statements.

He said Mr Xi had reiterated China's right to perform exercises.

"I said what I said at the time, which is that it was within international law, there was no breach of international law by China in that, but that we were concerned about the notice and the ways that it happened, including the live fire exercises," he said.

"In response, of course … President Xi Jinping said that China engaged in exercises just as Australia engages in exercises."

Mr Albanese said he also raised the case of Australian man Yang Hengjun, who is detained in a Chinese prison on spying charges he has long denied and whose health is ailing.

"I raised the case. You wouldn't expect there to be an immediate outcome, and that is not the way things work. The way it works is by that patient, calibrated advocacy, what Australians do, what my government does," he said.

The PM said the ownership of the Port of Darwin was not raised. Asked whether Donald Trump or US trade tariffs had been discussed, he said both leaders had asserted the importance of international trade.

A statement from the Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs said Mr Xi told Mr Albanese the two countries should "work together to uphold fairness and justice, support multilateralism and free trade, defend the UN-centred international system and the international order based on international law".

The statement suggested Mr Albanese had expressed support for China's bid to host the APEC summit in 2026 and that the PM had said Australia was "ready to work with China" to support multilateralism and the UN and "jointly safeguard free trade and WTO rules – contributing to greater global stability and predictability".

Earlier on Tuesday, the pair made public remarks in Beijing's Great Hall of the People prior to a closed-door meeting and a lunch attended by Mr Albanese's fiancee, Jodie Haydon, and China's First Lady, Peng Liyuan.

In his remarks, Mr Xi welcomed an improvement in relations between the two countries since what he called "the setback", an apparent reference to the cooling of bilateral ties during the Morrison government.

"The China–Australia relationship has [risen] from the setback and turned around, bringing tangible benefits to the Chinese and Australian peoples," he said.

"No matter how the international landscape may evolve, we should uphold this overall direction unswervingly."

In his own remarks, Mr Albanese emphasised economic ties and said it was important to have "direct discussions on the issues that matter to us, and to the stability and prosperity of our region."

"Australia values our relationship with China and will continue to approach it in a calm and consistent manner, guided by our national interest, which we regard very much as the relationship being positive," he said.

The meeting came on the third full day of the PM's six-day trip to the country, his second as prime minister, which began in Shanghai.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-07-15/albanese-xi-meeting-live-fire-drills-beijing/105535036

https://x.com/AlboMP/status/1944980617680048634

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109327

File: 2bfca8683c5ef2a⋯.mp4 (5.09 MB,960x540,16:9,Clipboard.mp4)

File: b695679f1adf5f0⋯.jpg (243.47 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23329028 (151300ZJUL25) Notable: Xi tells Albanese that China’s ships will conduct exercises wherever they want in international waters – In Beijing, President Xi Jinping told Prime Minister Anthony Albanese that Chinese naval forces would conduct drills “just as Australia engages in exercises,” brushing aside concerns over February’s live-fire operations around Australia. Albanese urged Xi to maintain the status quo on Taiwan and raised the case of detained writer Yang Hengjun. Despite Beijing’s anger at Labor’s pledge to strip Chinese company Landbridge of its lease over Darwin Port, Xi did not raise the issue, instead hailing improved ties and “mutually beneficial co-operation.” Albanese also met Premier Li Qiang and National People’s Congress chairman Zhao Leji, while Business Council of Australia chief Bran Black led 14 major company CEOs in Beijing talks.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109325

>>109326

Xi tells Albanese that China’s ship will conduct exercises wherever they want in international waters

BEN PACKHAM and WILL GLASGOW - 15 July 2025

1/2

Xi Jinping has told Anthony Albanese his naval forces will conduct exercises wherever they want in international waters as the Prime Minister called for more notice of PLA-Navy drills near Australia and urged the Chinese President not to invade Taiwan.

Hosting Mr Albanese in Beijing’s Great Hall of the People on Tuesday, China’s supreme leader lauded the improvements in the countries’ bilateral ties under Labor, calling for the Australian leader to “unswervingly” maintain the positive momentum in the ­relationship “no matter how the international landscape may evolve”.

Mr Xi warmly welcomed Mr Albanese to the capital for their fourth meeting amid glowing state media coverage, with one of the Chinese Communist Party’s most influential mouthpieces saying his visit sent a message “to the wider world” amid Donald Trump’s ­tariff chaos.

The Prime Minister and his ­fiance, Jodie Haydon, were treated to a rare lunchtime banquet by Mr Xi, as well as a full military honour guard. A second feast followed in the evening with China’s No.2 leader, Premier Li Qiang.

Speaking after his meeting with the President, Mr Albanese revealed he had agreed to a review of the China-Australia free-trade agreement, amid Chinese calls for the deal to be expanded to allow closer co-operation on artificial intelligence and technology, which Australia has ruled out.

Mr Albanese said he raised February’s surprised live-fire drills by Chinese warships in the Tasman Sea which went on to circumnavigate Australia in an unprecedented show of force, while conceding the vessels had operated within their legal rights.

“I said what I said at the time, which was that it was within international law … but that we were concerned about the notice and the way that it happened, including the live-fire exercises,” he said.

“In response, of course, President Xi said that China engaged in exercises just as Australia engages in exercises.”

His comments came as ­Defence officials declined to say if they were tracking Chinese spy ships heading towards Queensland’s coast to monitor Australia’s biggest military exercise, Talisman Sabre, after earlier saying their ­arrival was expected soon.

Amid US calls for Australia to declare whether it would support its ally in a war with China over Taiwan, Mr Albanese urged Mr Xi to maintain the status quo on the self-governed territory, which the Chinese leader has ordered his forces to be prepared to seize by 2027. Asked whether he regarded China as a threat, he said: “We have strategic competition in the region, but we continue to engage in order to support peace and security in the region and stability in the region.”

At the opening of their meeting, Mr Xi said he and his guest had “reached many common understandings” during their past three meetings.

Speaking just over six months after China lifted the last of its $20bn in punitive trade bans on Australian exporters, Mr Xi said the countries could avoid further diplomatic tensions by “seeking common ground while sharing differences and pursuing mutually beneficial co-operation”.

“No matter how the international landscape may evolve, we should approach this overall direction unswervingly,” he said in a veiled reference to the global instability caused by Mr Trump – who Mr Albanese is yet to meet face-to-face. The Prime Minister said he and his Chinese counterpart did not speak directly about the US, and that Mr Trump’s trade policies had not changed how Australia approached its relationship with China.

“Our relationship with China is very separate from that. China is our major trading partner. The destination for more than one in four of our export dollars comes here. The trade with the United States is important, but it’s less than 5 per cent,” he said. Mr Albanese, who also had meetings with Premier Li and National People’s Congress chairman Zhao Leji, called on Mr Xi to release jailed Australian writer Yang Hengjun, who is serving a suspended death sentence on espionage charges.

He was not expecting any swift change in his status after six years of detention. “You wouldn’t expect there to be an immediate outcome. That’s not the way these things work. The way it works is by that patient, calibrated advocacy. That is what Australians do,” he said.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109328

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23329049 (151306ZJUL25) Notable: Video: HIMARS rocket platform fired in Talisman Sabre wargame exercise – The biennial Talisman Sabre war games opened in Central Queensland with Australia’s first live-fire of the US-made High Mobility Artillery Rocket Systems (HIMARS). Brigadier Nick Wilson called it “a remarkable day,” marking the Army’s entry into long-range, multi-domain strike capability. About 35,000 personnel from 19 countries, including the US, UK, Japan, Canada, France and Germany, are taking part, with Vietnam and Malaysia attending as observers. Wilson said the drills demonstrate that “we are stronger together,” as the exercise expands beyond Australia’s borders for the first time into the Torres Strait and Papua New Guinea.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109224

>>109320

HIMARS rocket platform fired in Talisman Sabre wargame exercise

9News Staff - Jul 14, 2025

The largest and most sophisticated wargame exercise on Australian soil is under way in Central Queensland.

Exercise Talisman Sabre is a showcase of the most advanced weaponry from 19 countries, including Australia, the US, the UK, Canada, France, Japan and Germany, and involves about 35,000 personnel.

Vietnam and Malaysia are attending as observers.

The exercise's opening act was the High Mobility Artillery Rocket Systems or HIMARS, a light multiple rocket launcher.

"Today was the first time the Australian Army has live-fired our long-range multi-domain platforms being the HIMARS, so it is a remarkable day," Brigadier Nick Wilson said.

The goal of the exercise is to strengthen relationships between allies and partners and to promote a peaceful and prosperous Indo-Pacific.

"We are stronger together and in partnering with both our regional and partner nations, we provide like minds in the application of our fire power," Wilson said.

The operation is usually conducted on Australian territory but for the first time will be extended across the Torres Strait and into Papua New Guinea.

https://www.9news.com.au/national/talisman-sabre-queensland-multiple-rocket-launcher-tested-in-wargame-exercise-news/73667e21-838e-40e1-a32f-bd41fa53229d

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ax0llt3v9KY

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109329

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23329060 (151310ZJUL25) Notable: Video: Talisman Sabre 2025: Largest-ever joint military exercise underway in Central Queensland - A massive field hospital, capable of treating dozens of people, is up and running in central Queensland. It's part of the largest ever joint military exercise currently underway. - 9 News Australia

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109224

>>109320

Talisman Sabre 2025: Largest-ever joint military exercise underway in Central Queensland

9 News Australia

Jul 15, 2025

A massive field hospital, capable of treating dozens of people, is up and running in central Queensland. It's part of the largest ever joint military exercise currently underway.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MjShHfP1gZ0

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109330

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23329076 (151316ZJUL25) Notable: Video: Australia hosts military drills with US and other nations, likely to draw Chinese surveillance – The largest-ever Talisman Sabre exercises are under way, involving 35,000 troops from 19 nations, with Malaysia and Vietnam attending as observers. Australia live-fired its newly acquired HIMARS rocket system for the first time at Shoalwater Bay in Queensland. Defence Industry Minister Pat Conroy said Chinese surveillance ships had monitored every exercise since 2017 and were again expected: “It’d be very unusual for them not to observe it.” Prime Minister Anthony Albanese, in China for talks with Xi Jinping, said the issue would not be raised, calling such monitoring “nothing unusual.”

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109224

>>109320

>>109315

Australia hosts military drills with US and other nations, likely to draw Chinese surveillance

ROD MCGUIRK - July 15, 2025

MELBOURNE, Australia (AP) - The largest-ever war-fighting drills in Australia, Exercise Talisman Sabre, are underway and expected to attract the attention of Chinese spy ships.

Australia launched missiles from its M142 High Mobility Artillery Rocket System, known as HIMARS, on Monday during live-fire exercises at the Shoalwater Bay Training Area, a 4,500 square kilometer (1,700 square mile) Outback expanse in Queensland state. The HIMARS launchers were recently bought from the United States.

“Today was the first time the Australian Army has live-fired our long-range, multi-domain platforms being the HIMARS, so it is a remarkable day,” Brig. Nick Wilson told reporters.

Talisman Sabre began in 2005 as a biennial joint exercise between the United States and Australia.

This year, more than 35,000 military personnel from 19 nations, including Canada, Fiji, France, Germany, India, Indonesia, Japan, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Papua New Guinea, the Philippines, South Korea, Singapore, Thailand, Tonga, and the United Kingdom, will take part over three weeks, Australia’s defense department said.

Malaysia and Vietnam are also attending as observers.

The exercise will also take place in Papua New Guinea, Australia’s nearest neighbor. It is the first time Talisman Sabre activities have been held outside Australia.

Chinese surveillance ships have monitored naval exercises off the Australian coast during the last four Talisman Sabre exercises and were expected to surveil the current exercise, Defense Industry Minister Pat Conroy said.

“The Chinese military have observed these exercises since 2017. It’d be very unusual for them not to observe it,” Conroy said.

“We’ll adjust accordingly. We’ll obviously observe their activities and monitor their presence around Australia, but we’ll also adjust how we conduct those exercises,” Conroy added.

Conroy said the Chinese were not yet shadowing ships as of Sunday.

The exercise officially started on Sunday with a ceremony in Sydney attended by Deputy Commanding General of U.S. Army Pacific Lt. Gen. J.B. Vowell and Australia’s Chief of Joint Operations Vice-Adm. Justin Jones.

The exercise, showcasing Australia’s defense alliance with the United States, started a day after Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese began a six-day visit to China, where he is expected to hold his fourth face-to-face meeting with Chinese President Xi Jinping in Beijing on Tuesday.

Albanese said Chinese surveillance of Talisman Sabre would not be an issue raised with Xi.

“That would be nothing unusual. That has happened in the past and I’ll continue to assert Australia’s national interest, as I do,” Albanese told reporters in Shanghai Monday.

Albanese also noted that while he had visited the United States as prime minister five times, he had only been to China twice.

The Australian leader has been criticized at home for failing to secure a face-to-face meeting with U.S. President Donald Trump.

“I look forward to a constructive engagement with President Trump. We have had three constructive phone conversations,” Albanese said.

https://apnews.com/article/australia-talisman-sabre-miltary-exercise-e236e5ed9173bc766c2ed73441b3efda

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q-yv5ePUYc0

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109331

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23329122 (151327ZJUL25) Notable: Video: Talisman Sabre 2025: The largest military exercise in Australian history - The Australian Defence Forces and 19 other nations are conducting the largest military exercise ever staged in Australian waters, known as Talisman Sabre 2025. The exercise involves 40,000 troops and showcases Australia's newly acquired High Mars rocket launchers with a 500-kilometre range of fire. - 7NEWS Australia

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109224

>>109320

>>109315

Talisman Sabre 2025: The largest military exercise in Australian history

7NEWS Australia

Jul 14, 2025

The Australian Defence Forces and 19 other nations are conducting the largest military exercise ever staged in Australian waters, known as Talisman Sabre 2025. The exercise involves 40,000 troops and showcases Australia's newly acquired High Mars rocket launchers with a 500-kilometre range of fire.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=thV9X7W8x0I

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109332

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23329161 (151341ZJUL25) Notable: Video: Talisman Sabre 2025: As PM charms China, Australia hosts 19-nation war games with eyes on Beijing – As Anthony Albanese met Chinese leaders in Beijing, Australia launched its largest-ever Talisman Sabre, with 40,000 troops from 19 nations openly training with China “firmly pointed out” as the adversary. Vice Admiral Justin Jones said it was “19 friends, allies and partners wanting to operate together … for peace, stability, a free and open Indo-Pacific.” New capabilities on display included HIMARS rocket systems and the “Ghost Shark” submersible drone. Officials acknowledged that Australia’s forces on their own are dwarfed by China’s. Yet combined, the 19 participating nations match Beijing’s manpower and surpass its assets. Lt Gen Joel Vowell called the exercise “a deterrent mechanism” and reaffirmed the US–Australia alliance as “ironclad.”

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109224

>>109320

>>109315

Talisman Sabre 2025: As PM charms China, Australia hosts 19-nation war games with eyes on Beijing

As Anthony Albanese courts Beijing, 40,000 troops prepare for war, with China front and centre in Australia’s biggest military exercise yet.

Chris Reason - 15 July 2025

1/2

The timing was as extraordinary as it was unfortunate.

The very week Prime Minister Anthony Albanese chose to go charm China, Australia’s armed forces begin training to go to war with them.

It’s quite the diary clash; his appointments secretary might need to reconsider their position.

Exercise Talisman Sabre. It’s locked in around the same time every two years and has been since 2005. And this year was the biggest, most ambitious, and significant iteration of them all: 19 nations, 40,000 troops, all coming together to focus on just one increasingly troubling adversary: China.

There was a time Talisman would rattle that sabre at a so-called “unknown adversary” and the assembled press and generals would wink and nod their heads, knowing that was code for the People’s Republic. Like fine China itself, identification was always handled with care.

Not anymore.

The fingers of 19 nations are firmly pointed at the neighbourhood rogue; happy to point China out.

There’s almost an urgency about it now.

At the Talisman Sabre opening ceremony, held on the expansive landing deck of the Australian giant HMAS Adelaide on Sunday, the ADF Chief of Joint Operations Vice Admiral Justin Jones, had no hesitancy or inhibitions in putting China’s name firmly on the table.

When asked what message the coalition of Talisman partners was sending in the three-week exercise, it was all about China.

“Well, I will leave it to China to interpret what 19 friends, allies and partners wanting to operate together in the region means to them,” he said.

“But for me, it’s nations that are in search of a common aspiration for peace, stability, a free and open Indo-Pacific and adherence to international law.”

Vice Admiral Jones was also happy to openly discuss the expected arrival of China’s spy ships.

“I fully expect that the People’s Republic of China will want to come and observe the activities that occur as part of Exercise Talisman Sabre,” he said.

“They’ve made a habit of those over preceding iterations of the exercise.”

Adding cryptically: “And we have measures in place to cater for that.”

But he also revealed that if they were on the way, they’re late.

“There is no sign yet,” he said.

It could be that the PLA Navy leadership held back any orders to dispatch their ships while Mr Albanese was still their official visitor this week. A gesture of goodwill, perhaps.

But they won’t want to leave it much longer; there’s a lot to spy on.

Exercise Director Brigadier Damien Hill, who’s been planning the event for the last 700 days, says he’s counted a total of 79 defence “innovations” about to be unveiled at Talisman. Two of which the organisers were happy to discuss publicly.

The first is Australia’s newly-acquired HIMARS highly mobile rocket launch system — the so-called “shoot and scoot” weapon. It can fire rockets at a range of up to 500km. Even out to sea — almost as far as the Chinese ships conducting live fire exercises off the coast in February.

The ADF has bought 42 units. And it’s excited. These were the first items displayed in a breathtaking live fire exercise at Shoalwater Bay on the opening day of the exercise yesterday.

The second breakthrough acquisition: the ADF’s new submersible drones. I asked the US Deputy Commanding General, Lt Gen Joel Vowell, if we’d see any used in TS25. In fact, I’d walked straight past one as we boarded the Adelaide. And he confirmed, it will be used.

The boldly-named “Ghost Shark” was jointly developed and funded between Defence and Anduril Australia. They are a naval warfare game changer — able to be used for long-range stealth operations at a depth of 6000m and gather intelligence, or deliver strike capabilities.

World-leading Aussi-tech — on-budget, ahead of schedule. They are one of the rare success stories of ADF procurement. Expect to see a proliferation of them in the years to come.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109333

File: cfe8bef02d8fe6b⋯.jpg (120.76 KB,1368x912,3:2,Clipboard.jpg)

File: aad3ca1f62c1427⋯.jpg (114.16 KB,1368x912,3:2,Clipboard.jpg)

File: ea5eeb414c538c0⋯.jpg (258.5 KB,1368x912,3:2,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23333070 (160912ZJUL25) Notable: Lunch invitation leaves Albanese in a delicate position in rapidly changing global order – Prime Minister Anthony Albanese was honoured with a rare lunch with Xi Jinping in Beijing’s Great Hall, the first such gesture since Malcolm Turnbull in 2016. Xi lauded improved ties, saying relations had “risen from the setbacks and turned around,” while Albanese raised concerns over February’s Chinese live-fire drills near Australia and the detention of writer Yang Hengjun. China Daily praised Albanese’s “clearer judgment” than predecessor Scott Morrison, framing his six-night visit as a success. The visit coincided with Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov and Indian External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar also being in Beijing.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109325

>>109326

>>109327

Lunch invitation leaves Albanese in a delicate position in rapidly changing global order

WILL GLASGOW - 15 July 2024

1/2

Xi Jinping has clearly decided Anthony Albanese is a world leader worth his time.

That is going to make some people in Australia very happy – and it is going to make another group in Australia, and in Washington, more than a little worried.

After their official meeting on Tuesday, the Chinese leader cleared his diary to have lunch with the visiting Australian Prime Minister. The PM’s fiancee Jodie Haydon was also invited for lunch (although Xi’s wife Peng Liyuan was not along).

It was the first time an Australian leader had eaten with Xi since Malcolm Turnbull did during a trip to China in 2016.

“I thank very much President Xi for the bilateral meeting and also (for) hosting a banquet lunch there in the Great Hall of the People, which is an honour which is bestowed on Australia,” the PM said at a press conference in Beijing after the meal.

It is an increasingly rare experience for visiting leaders to get so much time in the Chairman of Everything’s diary.

“Xi receives lots of guests but doesn’t invite many to lunch,” Richard McGregor, senior fellow at the Lowy Institute and Australia’s top expert on elite Chinese politics, told The Australian.

“He clearly sees value in investing in Albanese personally, especially as he would have been advised that he might be in charge of Australia for some years to come.”

After his election win, Albanese could be PM for the rest of Donald Trump’s second term in the White House. It is a period ripe with opportunity for Beijing.

No one should confuse Albanese’s lunch invitation, or dinner banquet he and a gaggle of Australian business leaders had with Premier Li Qiang on Tuesday night, for an end of Australia’s difficulties with China.

Xi made that crystal clear in the almost hour-long, pre-lunch meeting when the PM raised concerns about the lack of warning before the PLA Navy’s live-fire drills in the Tasman Sea earlier this year.

”President Xi said China engages in exercise just as Australia engages in exercises,” the PM told reporters.

In other words: get used to it.

It is an assertive message being taken increasingly seriously around the region – no where more so than in Taiwan.

Indeed as the PM attended his Beijing meetings, Taiwan held its annual Han Kuang military drills. Some of this week’s drills are taking place in Taipei, as President William Lai’s government tries to prepare the Taiwanese public for the realities of what would follow a feared Chinese attack.

China’s security state also did its bit to puncture the friendly bubble. On Tuesday morning, a posse of plainclothes security officers surrounded visiting Australian journalists who were filming by the Drum Tower, one of Beijing’s most beautiful Imperial-era structures. The visitors were told to delete all of their recordings – a routine encounter for international media based in China.

“China has a different system,” the PM said, euphemistically, when asked about the incident.

China’s Leninist system had made clear in a Tuesday editorial in one of its most influential state mastheads it was determined for the PM’s “notably long” six-night trip to be a success. It is revelling in the PM’s focus on economic ties and mostly upbeat rhetoric about Australia’s biggest trading partner.

In a tone-setting editorial, Beijing’s most authoritative English language organ, the China Daily, praised Albanese for his “clearer judgment and understanding of China” than his Coalition predecessor Scott Morrison.

“Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese’s ongoing visit to China is not only of significance for the bilateral and trade relations between the two countries, it also sends a message amid the changing global trade landscape,” the China Daily declared, grandly.

It noted the trip was taking place “against the backdrop of rising tensions between the United States and many countries because of the US administration’s recent threat to levy higher tariffs on them”.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109334

File: bd0b53a7442dff5⋯.jpg (308.8 KB,1920x1080,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23333078 (160920ZJUL25) Notable: Anthony Albanese ducks ‘free Yang Hengjun’ criticism – Prime Minister Anthony Albanese confirmed he raised the case of detained Australian writer Yang Hengjun with Xi Jinping but rejected claims his government’s approach is “too soft,” saying it would be “inappropriate and insensitive” to respond to family criticism. He said “patient, calibrated advocacy” was the only way to secure progress and pointed to past successes in securing the release of other Australians. Yang, arrested in 2019 and sentenced last year to a suspended death penalty on espionage charges, has endured harsh treatment in prison. His friend and PhD supervisor Feng Chongyi has condemned Labor’s stance as weak.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109325

>>109326

>>109327

Anthony Albanese ducks ‘free Yang Hengjun’ criticism

RHIANNON DOWN - 15 July 2025

Anthony Albanese has refused to respond to criticism from supporters of an Australian writer detained in China, Yang Hengjun, that Labor’s approach has been too weak, declaring it would be “inappropriate and insensitive” to weigh in.

The Prime Minister said he raised Dr Yang’s incarceration on espionage charges with Chinese President Xi Jinping when the two leaders sat down for a face-to-face meeting on Tuesday.

Speaking in Beijing just hours after the closed-doors meeting, Mr Albanese defended his government’s approach to securing Dr Yang’s release through diplomatic channels.

Amid mounting pressure to push for Dr Yang’s release after his six years in a Chinese prison, Mr Albanese said he would not respond to criticism from the democracy advocate’s supporters that the government’s approach had been too soft.

“I am certainly not going to comment on what the family of someone who is detained here or anywhere else …. that would be entirely inappropriate and insensitive,” Mr Albanese said.

“I understand the pressures that are on people when a loved one has been incarcerated. “What we will do, though, is put forward our views in a diplomatic way in order to try to maximise an ­outcome.”

Mr Albanese said it could not be expected that there would be an immediate outcome after he raised Dr Yang’s incarceration with Mr Xi, and his government would continue to progress his case through “patient, calibrated advocacy”.

“You wouldn’t expect there to be an immediate outcome, and that is not the way these things work,” Mr Albanese said.

“The way it works is by that ­patient, calibrated advocacy … that is what Australians do, what my government does. And I point to the record of my government when it comes to these ­issues.”

Mr Albanese defended his government’s track record on securing the release of Australians detained overseas, vowing to continue to pursue resolution in Dr Yang’s case.

“I point towards the outcomes where Australians here, in China, in Myanmar, in Vietnam, in Indonesia, the US and the UK have all received outcomes that, at the least, could be called satisfactory, because of my government’s advocacy,” he said. “We will continue to do that to achieve outcomes, and that is what our objective is.” Dr Yang was handed a suspended death sentence by a Beijing court last year, after he was sentenced for espionage charges in a secretive closed-door trial.

The sentence could be commuted to life in prison after two years of good behaviour.

His friend and PhD supervisor Feng Chongyi has repeatedly criticised the Australian government’s approach towards securing his release as being “soft”.

Dr Yang’s ordeal has continued despite the Albanese government’s progress in stabilising ­its relationship with Beijing, with the thawing of relations ­having no impact on his detention so far.

Following his arrest at Guangzhou airport by Chinese security agents in January 2019, Dr Yang has endured enforced sleep ­deprivation, erratic medication and being strapped to a “tiger chair”, which was used to restrain him during interrogation sessions.

Dr Yang was accused of handing secret information to Taiwan’s security officials when he was based in Hong Kong. Dr Yang has maintained his innocence.

Before migrating to Australia in 2000, Dr Yang worked for China’s Ministry of State Security.

He has published a series of spy novels and completed a PhD at UTS.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/anthony-albanese-ducks-free-yang-hengjung-criticism/news-story/dacea2b4743fafbaccd66cda7f0b3f5d

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109335

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23333091 (160926ZJUL25) Notable: Video: Anthony Albanese follows in the footsteps of Gough Whitlam in China tour – Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has marked his China trip with a homage to Gough Whitlam, touring the Great Wall with fiancée Jodie Haydon, echoing Whitlam’s landmark 1971 visit that preceded Australia’s recognition of Beijing. Albanese praised Whitlam’s “courage” while Beijing’s state-run China Daily lauded Albanese for showing “clearer judgment” than Scott Morrison. At a press conference, Albanese insisted he acted only in the national interest, not party politics. His six-night stay continues in Chengdu, with stops at Cochlear’s factory and the panda breeding centre.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109325

>>109326

>>109327

Anthony Albanese follows in the footsteps of Gough Whitlam in China tour

WILL GLASGOW - 16 July 2025

1/2

After his big day in the Great Hall with Xi Jinping, Anthony Albanese spent most of Wednesday leading a Gough Whitlam tribute mission.

The Chinese government was delighted to assist. A huge section of the Badaling section of the Great Wall – about 80km northwest of Beijing and normally heaving with tourists – was closed off for the Australian Prime Minister, his fiancee Jodie Haydon and the travelling media, diplomatic and security entourage.

As opposition leader, Whitlam, one of the Labor PM’s political ­heroes, had visited this same chunk of Ming dynasty-era Great Wall back in 1971, the year before he won government, severed official relations with Taipei and switched recognition to Beijing.

“There is no question that Gough Whitlam made the right decision in 1971 and that Australia has benefited from that,” Albanese said on Wednesday. “It’s certainly understood in China that that was an early decision. And it was a decision that took courage.”

Labor Party history presents Whitlam as a visionary global leader, but you need to be pretty parochial to think recognising Beijing in 1972 was “early”.

By then, more than 60 countries had done so.

The flurry of recognition in the late 1960s and throughout the ’70s had a lot more to do with Mao Zedong reorienting China’s foreign policy after Beijing’s rupture with Moscow than the long-sightedness, or otherwise, of other world leaders at the time.

Washington, which did not officially recognise the People’s Republic until 1979, did not rush its formal recognition because it did not want Taiwan and its population to come under the rule of the Communist Party. (Whitlam, as one of his China advisers, Ross Terrill, has recorded, had no such qualms.)

The Chinese government is more than happy to endorse the ”Whitlam as visionary” Labor version of Australia’s history with the PRC.

The PM has lent into the legend. In Shanghai, he gave a speech to the Australian business community in the Peace Hotel where, he told his audience, Whitlam spent his 55th birthday on his brazen trip as an opposition leader, pursuing recognition of Beijing despite the then Australian government’s reservations.

On his first trip to China as PM in November 2023, Albanese included a visit to Beijing’s Temple of Heaven to recreate a photo from Whitlam’s 1971 trip.

China’s ambassador Xiao Qian could not have looked happier as he watched that day of politically loaded sightseeing.

China claims not to interfere in Australian domestic politics. Yet it is hard to square that with much of what its spokespeople and official mouthpieces say.

In a tone-setting editorial before Albanese’s more than two hours with Xi, the government-controlled China Daily repeated Beijing’s line that all the problems in the relationship were the fault of the Coalition. “Albanese’s visit shows that the Australian side has a clearer judgment and understanding of China than it had under the previous Scott Morrison government,” the influential masthead purred.

Up until 2020, it was former prime minister Malcolm Turnbull who China blamed for all the “twists and turns” in the bilateral relationship.

At Wednesday’s press conference on the Great Wall, I asked ­Albanese if he was worried about the Australia-China relationship being politicised?

“My job is to be Prime Minister of Australia – to represent the Australian government. That’s the capacity I am here in,” he said.

”I continue to do so to the best of my ability each and every day. Each and every day, I don’t think about any interests of a political party.

“What I do is I think about the national interest and I continue to do that each and every day.

“And I would encourage everyone in the parliament to do the same, including those commenting on international relations,” he said.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109336

File: ff6ee9a65e5329e⋯.jpg (522.45 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 16419da72681a4d⋯.jpg (163.03 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 4af631f3e60e210⋯.jpg (323.9 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23333103 (160938ZJUL25) Notable: Chinese premier Li Qiang presses Albanese over treatment of Chinese firms amid Darwin angst – Prime Minister Anthony Albanese rejected Premier Li Qiang’s call for a “fair, open and non-discriminatory” environment for Chinese investors after Li raised concerns over Australia’s strict foreign investment rules and the treatment of firms like Darwin Port leaseholder Landbridge. Albanese insisted all bids are assessed “case-by-case” in the national interest and defended AUKUS as vital to counter China’s build-up. Chinese state media flagged Darwin and security ties with the US as points of tension, though neither Xi nor Li raised them directly. The leaders also agreed to resume the China–Australia Strategic Economic Dialogue later this year.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109325

>>109326

>>109335

Chinese premier Li Qiang presses Albanese over treatment of Chinese firms amid Darwin angst

WILL GLASGOW - 16 July 2025

1/2

Anthony Albanese has rejected a Chinese push for his government to weaken rules blocking the country’s investors from key economic sectors, as a Beijing mouthpiece warned Labor against stripping the Port of Darwin lease from Chinese-owned company Landbridge.

On the fourth day of his landmark trip to China, the Prime Minister said his government wanted to secure peace and stability through “positive engagement” with Beijing, but defended its plan to acquire nuclear-powered submarines through the $358bn AUKUS program.

After a marathon day of meetings with Chinese President Xi Jinping and Premier Li Qiang on Tuesday, Mr Albanese travelled to the Great Wall of China, paying homage to his Labor hero Gough Whitlam, who visited the same Badaling section of the wall as opposition leader in 1971.

The excursion, with fiancee Jodie Haydon, followed pointed remarks by Mr Li late on Tuesday in which he raised concerns about Australia’s treatment of Chinese firms, which are routinely barred by the Foreign Investment Review Board from taking stakes in critical infrastructure and other sensitive sectors.

“We hope that the Australian side can provide a fair, open and non-discriminatory business environment for Chinese enterprises in Australia,” Mr Li said during his meeting with Mr Albanese in the Great Hall of the People.

At a later business roundtable, which included senior Chinese business figures with direct experience of Australia’s strict ­foreign investment regime, the Premier pressed the point again.

“We hope that the Australian side will treat Chinese enterprises visiting Australia fairly and properly solve the problems encountered by enterprises in market access, investment review, and other aspects,” Mr Li said.

Mr Albanese, who has used his second China visit as Prime Minister to talk up the strength of ­bilateral trade ties, pushed back on the critique, saying China wasn’t being singled out. “We have a case-by-case issue when it comes to foreign investment (which) is viewed not on the basis of any one country, but on the basis of an objective assessment of our national interest,” he said.

While the US maintains a policy of “peace through strength”, Mr Albanese said his five-day visit to China underscored his principle that working more closely with potential rivals was a key to maintaining good relations.

“It’s important that we build stability and security in our world, and part of that has to have positive engagement. That’s what I’m doing here,” he said.

However, he said Australia still needed the deterrent of nuclear submarines through the AUKUS program, which is aimed squarely at countering China’s massive military build-up in the Indo-Pacific.

“We need a defence force, and we make no apologies for investing in our capability to give Australia the defence and security assets that we need,” Mr Albanese said.

The official Chinese readout of the Prime Minister’s meeting with Mr Xi on Tuesday said he had assured his counterpart that Australia adhered to the “one-China” policy and did not support “Taiwan independence”. But Mr Albanese said he had simply restated longstanding Australian policy.

“We support the status quo,” he said. “By definition, we don’t support any unilateral action on Taiwan. That’s been our position for a long period of time. Nothing is different.”

The Prime Minister flew from Beijing to the capital of Sichuan Province, Chengdu, on Wednesday afternoon, where he will visit China’s largest panda breeding facility, attend a medical technology lunch, and tour Australian bionic ear company Cochlear’s local manufacturing operation.

Australia is the world’s second-largest producer of medtech patents, while China is one of Cochlear’s top five global markets.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109337

File: bf24d2cfe3d8037⋯.jpg (433.56 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: bc4e894088dff1b⋯.jpg (275.49 KB,1280x720,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: ad3623547718f96⋯.jpg (129.8 KB,1280x720,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 519ef1afd05c092⋯.jpg (205.33 KB,1800x1235,360:247,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23333122 (160949ZJUL25) Notable: COMMENTARY: China’s embrace of Anthony Albanese aimed at Trump, wider world“Australia is back in China’s good books, and Beijing wants the world to know it. Anthony Albanese is being held up by Xi Jinping as a model Western leader, playing a bit part in China’s global effort to be seen as a reasonable alternative to Donald Trump. The country’s state-run newspapers carried front-page pictures … extolling the ‘turnaround’ in bilateral relations. The tabloid Global Times said the Australia-China relationship was poised to soar into the ‘stratosphere’. Meanwhile, on page three of the China Daily, there was a photo of Xi extending a hand to Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov … The accompanying story says the pair discussed how to ‘promote a more just and equitable order’. Behold, the two faces of China.” – Ben Packham, The Australian

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109325

>>109326

>>109335

COMMENTARY: China’s embrace of Anthony Albanese aimed at Trump, wider world

BEN PACKHAM - 16 July 2025

Australia is back in China’s good books, and Beijing wants the world to know it.

Anthony Albanese is being held up by Xi Jinping as a model Western leader, playing a bit part in China’s global effort to be seen as a reasonable alternative to Donald Trump.

The country’s state-run newspapers carried front-page pictures on Wednesday of a beaming Albanese meeting President Xi in the Great Hall of the People, and stories extolling the “turnaround” in bilateral relations.

According to the China Daily, Xi told Albanese the improvement in relations proved “adhering to the principles of treating each other as equals, seeking common ground while shelving differences, and engaging in mutually beneficial co-operation” would serve the interests of both countries and their people.

The subtext? “Australia shows us respect, unlike the US. If countries want to get along with China and reap the economic rewards, behave like Albanese.”

The tabloid Global Times said the Australia-China relationship was poised to soar into the “stratosphere”.

But its take wasn’t all positive, sounding a note of warning in its lead editorial over Albanese’s pledge to strip Chinese-owned company Landbridge of its lease over the strategically located Port of Darwin.

“At present, there are specific issues between China and Australia that need to be discussed, such as the lease of Darwin Port and the expansion of the China-Australia Free Trade Agreement,” it said.

“There are also practical obstacles, especially the tendencies towards ‘pan-politicisation’ and ‘pan-securitisation’, as well as interference from third parties.”

China’s No.2, Premier Li Qiang, also fired a shot across the bow in a speech to Australian and Chinese business leaders on Wednesday night, warning Beijing expected a non-discriminatory business environment for its companies.

“I trust that Australia will also treat Chinese enterprises fairly and also properly resolve issues in terms of market access and investment review,” he said.

Li laid out the rewards on offer if Australia toed the line, saying the Chinese could consume more “lobsters, wine and tuna” than the country’s exporters could sell.

“About 80 per cent of the trade surpluses of Australia come from its trade with China,” he said. “Such trade has surged in recent years, and this has proved that continued sound development of China-Australia trade co-operation can best serve the common interests of both countries.”

For his part, Albanese is glossing over the irritants in the relationship, hailing the trip as a success, and proof of his “patient and calibrated approach” to stabilising bilateral ties.

And to those who question the wisdom of getting too close to the communist dictatorship that held Australia’s economy to ransom just a few years ago and is turning out warships and submarines at a rate of knots?

“Dialogue builds understanding,” Albanese said, restating his guiding foreign policy principle that is at once blindingly obvious while completely obscuring the complexity of the relationship.

As is always the case with Chinese diplomacy, there were outcomes to report.

In the official leader-level talks with Li on Tuesday, the PM agreed to a review of the countries’ 2014 free trade deal.

This is formality, activating an inbuilt mechanism in the deal a decade after it was signed. But for Beijing, in the current circumstances, it’s a clear win, opening the way for it to raise a range of curly issues in upcoming consultations.

In a more minor success for the Chinese side, Australia agreed to allow the import of Chinese jujubes, also known as red dates. The sweet, slightly tangy fruit is apparently packed with vitamin C, potassium and anti-oxidants – a further symbol in Beijing’s telling of Australia’s appetite for all things China.

Albanese and Li also declared apples from mainland Australia would now be allowed into China under new biosecurity protocols, reannouncing an agreement revealed several months ago.

Meanwhile, on page three of the China Daily, there was a photo of Xi extending a hand to Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov, whom he met before he sat down with Albanese on Tuesday.

The accompanying story says the pair discussed how to “promote a more just and equitable order”.

Behold, the two faces of China.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/commentary/chinas-embrace-of-anthony-albanese-aimed-at-trump-wider-world/news-story/300a1b3212a01ed94e665e150c5db429

https://www.chinadaily.com.cn/a/202507/16/WS6876e4c6a31000e9a573c36a.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109338

File: 43ab4cc64a5fe6d⋯.jpg (310.47 KB,1200x720,5:3,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23333139 (160956ZJUL25) Notable: Looking forward to seeing China-Australia relations cruise steadily in the ‘stratosphere’: Global Times editorial“Chinese President Xi Jinping met with Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese … bringing tangible benefits to the people of both countries. As the China-Australia comprehensive strategic partnership enters its second decade, this meeting has set the tone for steady progress in bilateral ties while keeping external disruptions at bay. … Of course, compared with the ‘minefields’ status described by the Global Times editorial three years ago, today’s China-Australia relationship is like a plane flying in the ‘stratosphere’ after passing through the storm zone, and the most turbulent and bumpy period has passed.” – Global Times

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109325

>>109335

>>109337

Looking forward to seeing China-Australia relations cruise steadily in the ‘stratosphere’: Global Times editorial

Global Times - Jul 15, 2025

1/2

Chinese President Xi Jinping met with Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese at the Great Hall of the People in Beijing on Tuesday morning, during the latter's official visit to China. This marks the fourth meeting between the two leaders in three years. President Xi said that with the joint efforts of both sides, China-Australia relations have emerged from their low point and achieved a turnaround in recent years, bringing tangible benefits to the people of both countries. As the China-Australia comprehensive strategic partnership enters its second decade, this meeting has set the tone for steady progress in bilateral ties while keeping external disruptions at bay.

This visit marks Albanese's first trip to China since his re-election, and China is the country where he has spent the longest time during an overseas visit in this term. His seven-day itinerary spans Shanghai, Beijing, and Chengdu, accompanied by a delegation that includes senior executives from major Australian companies. In recent years, as China-Australia relations have continued to improve, the Australian government's understanding of its relationship with China has also deepened. During the meeting on Tuesday, Albanese said that Australia values its relations with China, adheres to the one-China policy and Australia has never sought to decouple from the Chinese economy. He has demonstrated a pragmatic and rational approach to China policy. An Australian scholar described the current state of China-Australia relations this way - Both sides recognize their differences, but agree that those differences should not define the relationship. Such wisdom in "seeking harmony without uniformity" is especially enlightening at a time when unilateralism and protectionism are on the rise.

Australia is currently facing tariff pressure from Washington, but the outlook for the development of China-Australia economic and trade relations remains very clear. Since 2009, China has been Australia's largest trading partner, top import source, and biggest export market for 16 consecutive years. One in four Australian jobs depends on trade, and approximately 25 percent of the country's exports go to China. In addition, China has long been Australia's largest source of international students and overseas tourists, with more than one million Chinese tourists visiting Australia each year.

According to a recent report released by the China-Australia Chamber of Commerce, over 70 percent of surveyed Australian businesses operating in China said that improvements in bilateral relations have had a positive impact on their long-term strategies in the Chinese market.

The turnaround in China-Australia relations reflects the genuine expectations of both peoples. It also demonstrates that China and Australia are opportunities for each other's development - and highlights the strong appeal of China's vast market, the resilience of its economic growth, and the certainty of its continued commitment to opening-up.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109339

File: 863d1feef8afeb3⋯.jpg (164.5 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23333155 (161001ZJUL25) Notable: Queensland to fast track $1.23bn graphite mine in order to break China’s dominance – Queensland will fast track a $1.23bn Graphinex project to mine and process graphite for Australia’s first battery anode hub, seeking to cut dependence on China, which dominates 98% of global supply. The Croydon mine and Townsville plant, backed by Japan’s Idemitsu and Indonesia’s Baramulti, are set for construction in 2027, creating more than 230 jobs. Graphinex’s Art Malone stressed graphite’s role in EV batteries, noting “6kg of lithium and 52kg of graphite” are needed per unit, making outside supply critical.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109325

Queensland to fast track $1.23bn graphite mine in order to break China’s dominance

GLEN NORRIS - 16 July 2025

Queensland will fast track a $1.23bn graphite mine to service the nation’s first battery anode hub as Australia moves to reduce China’s dominance of the critical battery mineral.

The project will involve privately held Graphinex developing a greenfield graphite mine at Croydon in northwest Queensland, as well as a processing plant in Townsville. The project will create 100 jobs during construction and 133 at peak operational capacity.

The project, which has been declared a co-ordinated project by the Queensland government, aims to build sovereign capability in battery manufacturing as surging global demand for natural graphite is forecast to rise 140 per cent by 2030.

Graphite provides the negative charge in lithium batteries and is the largest material in electric vehicles by weight, making it crucial for the clean-energy transition.

China dominates 98 per cent of graphite anode production, and companies such as Graphinex are expected to become increasingly important as an alternative supply – especially for the US and Europe. The facility has been backed by capital secured through a trade mission to North America led by Queensland’s Natural Resources and Mines Minister Dale Last earlier this year, and the Crisafulli government playing “matchmaker” to secure the investment.

Major investors include Japan energy giant Idemitsu and Indonesian resources company Baramulti. Subject to approvals, construction is anticipated to begin in 2027, and operations to begin about 18 months later.

Graphinex managing director Art Malone said the co-ordinated project declaration would reduce development timelines by at least 12 month. It would allow the state’s Co-ordinator-General to facilitate environmental approvals from the Queensland and federal governments, and involve stakeholder and community consultation processes.

“Approvals are the hardest thing to come by in any mining project and having the Co-ordinator-General stand behind you and stand behind the project means a lot,” he said. “It means a lot shorter time frames in a co-ordinated approach.”

Mr Malone said the international supply of graphite had been hampered due to export restrictions imposed by China over the past couple of years.

“To put the need for supply in perspective, in every electric vehicle lithium battery there’s 6kg of lithium and 52kg of graphite,” he said. “China processes 98 per cent of the world’s graphite so Japan, South Korea, the US and Europe are really looking for outside supply, and that’s become critical for us.

“We’re getting original equipment manufacturers and car manufacturers reaching out direct to try to move away from China supply because they put in place export restrictions two years ago. So it’s been really difficult to get the material out and Australia at the moment doesn’t produce any graphite.”

Mr Malone said the company had a “completely unique deposit” in one of the richest graphite reserves in the world.

“Our deposits are hard-rock volcanic,” he said. “Typically, every other graphite in the world is sedimentary and soft. Ours is a different style and style is important because it results in ultra-high performance and also batteries that last longer.”

Mr Last said the region had a reported 25 million tonnes of graphite – the third-largest deposit in the world.

“This is an exciting milestone that positions Queensland as a leader in graphite mining and processing,” Mr Last said.

“Investors are looking at jurisdictions that offer certainty, clarity and low sovereign risk.

“We’ve made it our mission to connect international investors with Queensland innovation, backed by the work of the resources cabinet committee to streamline approvals and get more projects like this off the ground.”

The Queensland government committed $5.1m in last month’s state budget to enhance mineral exploration and identify new opportunities across the state.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/renewable-energy-economy/queensland-to-fast-track-123bn-graphite-mine-in-order-to-break-chinas-dominance/news-story/1717d8055dd24922396249563dc19115

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109340

File: 5d30ea09051cceb⋯.jpg (1.39 MB,5128x3419,5128:3419,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23333159 (161007ZJUL25) Notable: Any AUKUS pledges ‘won’t be worth paper they’re written on’: Turnbull – Former prime minister Malcolm Turnbull said Australia cannot guarantee its AUKUS submarines would defend US interests, calling any such pledge meaningless as no government can bind its successor. He confirmed past conversations with Pentagon policy chief Elbridge Colby, who is pressing allies to clarify submarine use in a Taiwan conflict. Turnbull warned the US isn’t producing enough Virginia-class subs to meet its own needs, let alone AUKUS. PM Anthony Albanese declined to give assurances, maintaining strategic ambiguity, while Turnbull accused AUKUS supporters of “groupthink” and excessive deference to Washington.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109299

>>109316

>>109318

>>109323

Any AUKUS pledges ‘won’t be worth paper they’re written on’: Turnbull

Michael Koziol - July 16, 2025

Washington: Australia cannot give the US a guarantee it would use AUKUS submarines to defend American interests in any conflict with China, and any such assurances “would not be worth the paper they’re (not) written on”, former prime minister Malcolm Turnbull says.

Confirming his past conversations with US defence official Elbridge Colby, who is leading a Pentagon review of the AUKUS deal, Turnbull said it was impossible for Australia to promise nuclear-powered submarines for a hypothetical contingency.

“No Australian government can commit any of its defence assets in advance to some future conflict. And the American government wouldn’t do that,” he said in an interview.

“In any event, even if one government were to make a commitment of that kind, it couldn’t bind a successor government. And circumstances change. In this area, you really cannot deal in hypotheticals.”

Last week, this masthead revealed Colby was seeking a public declaration or private guarantee from Australia that it would use the US-made submarines it buys under AUKUS in a possible future conflict with China.

Later, the Pentagon confirmed a Financial Times story that said Colby wanted Australia and Japan to clarify the role they would play in a conflict over Taiwan. A senior US defence official said a key issue in the AUKUS review was the submarine “command structure” in the event of war.

Turnbull is a vocal AUKUS critic who, as prime minister, championed a submarine deal with France, which was canned in favour of AUKUS.

On Tuesday, The Australian reported Turnbull held substantial conversations with Colby about the AUKUS agreement and its defects.

Confirming those interactions, Turnbull said: “I have not spoken to Bridge Colby since he became undersecretary [for defence]. But I’ve spoken to him many times beforehand, and I know him and respect him.

“I don’t say anything privately that I don’t say publicly. My views on this are well known … my argument is we have to become more patriotic and more focused on Australian sovereignty and Australian independence.”

Turnbull said the nuclear-powered Virginia-class submarines were the most valued asset of the US Navy and noted the US was not currently building enough of them. The current production rate is about 1.2 boats a year, which needs to increase to 2.3 to satisfy US domestic needs and AUKUS obligations.

“In those circumstances, as Bridge [Colby] has said publicly, how can you responsibly part with them?” Turnbull said. “If you part with them, even to your best friend, you can’t be sure they would be available in the event of a conflict.”

Turnbull said he did not know if Colby was seeking such assurances, “but those assurances cannot be given”. “Even if they were given, they’re not worth the paper they’re (not) written on,” he said.

Speaking from China this week, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese declined to give an explicit public assurance that Australia’s nuclear submarines would help the US in a future conflict, suggesting that he valued the longstanding doctrine of strategic ambiguity – a policy of giving no public declarations about military plans.

The AUKUS agreement, brokered under former leaders Joe Biden and Scott Morrison, has bipartisan support in Australia despite its prominent detractors, including Turnbull and former Labor prime minister Paul Keating.

Coalition assistant defence spokesman Phil Thompson, an army veteran, said on Tuesday that Turnbull should stop “throwing grenades from the sidelines”, accusing him of trying to undermine AUKUS. Turnbull has regularly criticised the deal, including at the National Press Club and in a lecture last month at the Jeff Bleich Centre.

But Turnbull said AUKUS boosters exhibited groupthink.

“I get criticised for simply acknowledging reality. It is not a crime in Australia not to drink the Kool-Aid in Canberra,” he said.

“A lot of the people who talk about national security in this country need to become more patriotic.

“They have a misconception of what Australia’s national security is about. They seem to think our national security is simply a function of being more and more deferential to the US.”

The Pentagon has pushed back against suggestions it is solely focused on the contingency of a war with China over Taiwan. A US defence official, granted anonymity to speak freely, said the Pentagon’s concerns were wider than that.

“It is about how we can reasonably expect these kinds of critical assets [the submarines] to be allocated across different scenarios,” he said.

https://www.theage.com.au/world/north-america/any-aukus-pledges-won-t-be-worth-paper-they-re-written-on-turnbull-20250716-p5mfcp.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109341

File: 1ada511fcf09df7⋯.gif (4.48 MB,529x297,529:297,Clipboard.gif)

File: ec4a4122a0ef6f6⋯.jpg (107.4 KB,1920x1080,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 1429b7a4174e998⋯.jpg (666.07 KB,2048x1536,4:3,Clipboard.jpg)

File: c4f843de0fe4dde⋯.jpg (2.56 MB,3648x2736,4:3,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23338415 (170959ZJUL25) Notable: Charges laid but orchestrators behind synagogue attack remain a mystery – Investigators say the December 2024 firebombing of Melbourne’s Adass Israel synagogue, declared a likely terrorist incident, has “hit a wall” due to encryption and disposable street gangs concealing those who ordered it. A 20-year-old man has been charged only over the theft of the blue VW Golf used in the attack, but no terrorism charges have been laid. The Joint Counter Terrorism Taskforce (JCTT) maintains it was politically motivated, with $31m pledged for rebuilding and security. Officials believe multiple offenders remain at large, shielded by encrypted networks linking Melbourne’s wider arson-for-hire underworld.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109251

Charges laid but orchestrators behind synagogue attack remain a mystery

Chris Vedelago - July 17, 2025

1/2

The investigation into the terror attack on the Adass Israel synagogue has stalled, as the person or group who ordered the firebombing concealed their involvement by using encryption technology and untraceable thugs for hire.

Only one arrest linked to the attack has been made, but no terrorism charges have been laid since the firebombing in Ripponlea on December 6, 2024. Underworld and police sources have described how criminals used sophisticated encryption to protect themselves.

A police source familiar with the joint counterterrorism taskforce (JCTT) investigation but not authorised to speak publicly about its operations said the investigation had “hit a wall” and it remained unclear who ordered the attack or why.

The investigation had been able to identify only low-level suspects allegedly responsible for setting the fire, who were suspected violent criminals and street gang members for hire with no known political or ideological affiliations.

Anyone arrested would probably face only arson charges because there was not enough evidence to substantiate terrorism charges, the source said.

On Wednesday, a 20-year-old Williamstown man was charged over his alleged role in the theft of a blue VW Golf, which was allegedly used by those involved in the arson attack and in other serious crimes across Victoria.

The man faces charges including theft of a motor vehicle and failing to comply with an order to provide access to applications on his mobile telephone.

Victoria Police and the Australian Federal Police said in a statement to this masthead that the joint counterterrorism taskforce had “previously stated last year’s arson was likely a politically motivated attack”.

“This remains the position of the JCTT, who continue to investigate the fire at the Adass Israel synagogue as a terrorist attack.”

The synagogue building remains closed more than seven months after the attack. The federal and state governments have pledged more than $31 million towards rebuilding the synagogue and improving its security.

On December 6, 2024, three hooded and masked men in an allegedly stolen blue Volkswagen Golf drove to the synagogue on Glen Eira Avenue about 4.10am. After using an axe to smash open the front door, they poured petrol from jerry cans and then set it alight. One of the men, in a white face mask, filmed the attack on his mobile phone.

There were two members of the congregation inside the synagogue when the fire was lit, but both escaped the blaze, which was universally regarded as an antisemitic attack and condemned by Premier Jacinta Allan and Prime Minister Anthony Albanese.

Three days later, the firebombing was declared a “likely a terrorist incident” by a federal and state law enforcement committee, meaning it was assigned to the joint counterterrorism taskforce, which can access sweeping detention, search and surveillance powers, and seek assistance from spies at the Australian Security Intelligence Organisation.

A major break in the case appeared to come in May when the taskforce revealed the car used in the firebombing of Adass Israel had been tracked to a series of other crimes, including a drive-by shooting in Bundoora on the same night and the firebombing of Lux Nightclub in Chapel Street, South Yarra, a fortnight before.

A second source, who was familiar with the taskforce investigation but not authorised to speak publicly, said the car had been identified fairly soon after the Adass Israel attack but the decision was made to track the vehicle in the hope of identifying the person or group ultimately responsible.

Several media outlets also withheld reporting the information to avoid compromising the investigation.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109342

File: 1ad4f359a0d64bb⋯.jpg (247.07 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: e7efe276f6e4da6⋯.jpg (188.59 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23338446 (171010ZJUL25) Notable: Jason Clare flags ‘months’ until anti-Semitism response – Education Minister Jason Clare says the government will wait for reports on Islamophobia and wider racism before acting on Jillian Segal’s nearly 50 recommendations to combat anti-Semitism, including stripping funding from universities that fail to act. Executive Council of Australian Jewry co-chief Alex Ryvchin said the Jewish community cannot wait, warning the crisis has lasted “more than 21 months and counting.” Labor MP Ed Husic urged against “heavy-handed” measures, cautioning young Australians’ reactions to the Middle East should not be assumed to lead to anti-Semitism. Clare backed Husic’s call for careful consideration.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109286

Jason Clare flags ‘months’ until anti-Semitism response

NOAH YIM and RHIANNON DOWN - 16 July 2025

The nation’s Jewish community has told Labor it cannot wait any longer to implement a landmark plan to stop the wave of anti-Semitic hate, after Education Minister Jason Clare said he would not move till seeing a similar report on stamping out Islamophobia.

Nearly a week after Anthony Albanese personally unveiled the plan to stop anti-Semitism, Mr Clare declared that he will wait for the Special Envoy on Islamophobia to hand down his own report next month before he commits to any recommendations to punish universities that fail to stop anti-Semitism on campus. .

Executive Council of Australian Jewry co-chief executive Alex Ryvchin said Jewish Australians wanted to see swift action on anti-Semitism, regardless of any other reports that may be delivered on other issues. “Regardless of what reports on other issues may be ­presented in coming months, we expect progress in the implementation of Ms Segal’s plan,” he said.

“Ms Segal is the government’s expert adviser on addressing the specific problem of anti-Semitism and, after deep consultation, she has produced a clear and practical road map for ending a crisis of more than 21 months and counting. This is something that cannot wait.”

The Segal plan contained almost 50 recommendations, including stripping universities and arts festivals of public funding if they failed to stop anti-Semitism, training migration officials to screen for extremists, and implementing a nationwide definition of anti-Jewish hate for all levels of governments and public institutions.

Mr Clare said he wanted to see reports being prepared by Islamophobia envoy Aftab Malik and the Race Discrimination Commissioner before the government considers “those recommendations to their final conclusion”.

“We expect to see that report from the Special Envoy on Islamophobia next month,” he said.

“We’ll get the report from the Race Discrimination Commissioner later this year. But I do think I need to look at all of those reports that might make different recommendations here.”

The concerns come as Labor MP Ed Husic cautioned against being “heavy-handed” and rushing to adopt Ms Segal’s recommendations without careful consideration of the consequences. “Let’s take the time to think it through. A lot of thought has been put into it,” he said.

“Whatever we can do to bring people together without necessarily having to use sticks and threats of funding, et cetera.

“I would be very careful, I would much prefer us finding ways to bring people together rather than being heavy-handed in response. I would make that point for this report and whatever the Special Envoy for Islamophobia brings up.

“We should always be focusing on what brings us together.”

Mr Husic, who was pushed to the backbench because of post-election factional infighting, also raised concerns about the suggestion that young people were “at risk of becoming fully fledged anti-Semites due to misinformation”.

“Younger Australians, like most Australians, are genuinely moved by what they’re seeing in the Middle East, and it shouldn’t necessarily be assumed or a conclusion drawn that will lead to anti-Semitism,” he said.

Mr Clare backed Mr Husic’s comments, saying he takes his “counsel and advice all the time”.

“This is something that we’re going to give careful consideration to … having a look at racism in all its ugly forms across our universities and across our community,” Mr Clare said.

Mr Ryvchin said Mr Husic was entitled to his own opinion but not “his own facts”, pointing to research showing that anti-Semitism was becoming “more entrenched among young people”.

“This is unsurprising given that generation has grown up almost completely relying on digital platforms as the source of news and information,” he said.

On the same day as Ms Segal’s report was handed down last week, Mr Malik revealed he had consulted more than 100 Muslim leaders and representatives to inform his own plan to tackle anti-Muslim sentiment, to be handed down next month.

“The proposed measures adopt a whole-of-government ­approach, recognising that tackling Islamophobia requires co-ordinated effort across many sectors and all levels of society,” Mr Malik said at the time.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/jason-clare-flags-months-until-antisemitism-response/news-story/51deb69376f6bb6d06ad348b555c23b9

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109343

File: 468b7f36f19f3ed⋯.jpg (299.62 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: b40171dbb8ba6f8⋯.jpg (304.11 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: c0947ed86ea6471⋯.jpg (214.47 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23338461 (171017ZJUL25) Notable: Hate preacher can’t ‘bury’ court-ordered corrective social media posts – The Federal Court has ordered Wissam Haddad, also known as Abu Ousayd, to post pinned corrective notices on his social media admitting unlawful racial vilification of Jews, rejecting his attempt to avoid “advertising” them. Justice Angus Stewart ruled Haddad breached section 18C of the Racial Discrimination Act and granted the Executive Council of Australian Jewry a muzzle order to prevent future discrimination. ECAJ’s Peter Wertheim welcomed the decision as essential to counteracting harm, warning Haddad could face contempt if he breaches the order.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109228

>>109242

Hate preacher can’t ‘bury’ court-ordered corrective social media posts

STEPHEN RICE - 17 July 2025

Hate preacher Wissam Haddad has been stymied in a bid to “bury” a series of corrective notices he is required to post on all his social media pages admitting he broke the law in a series of lectures and sermons that asserted Jews were “vile” and “treacherous” people.

Judge Angus Stewart ruled in the Federal Court this month that Mr Haddad had breached section 18C of the Racial Discrimination Act, upholding a complaint that the speeches were the “racist project” of a self-proclaimed “masjid (mosque) shock jock” indiscriminately targeting those of Jewish faith and ethnicity.

Justice Stewart granted an application by the Executive Council of Australian Jewry (ECAJ) for a muzzle order on Mr Haddad that would find him in contempt of court should he racially discriminate against Jewish Australians in future.

The judge ordered the speeches be removed from social media but reserved judgment on the specific form of corrective notices that Mr Haddad and his Al Madina Dawah Centre would be required to post on their social media platforms, acknowledging he engaged in “unlawful behaviour based on racial hatred”.

Mr Haddad, who is also known as Abu Ousayd, had tried to escape the full impact of the orders, arguing that he should not be required to “pin” the corrective notices at the top of his social media pages because it would force him to “essentially advertise and promote” them.

But in a judgment released on Thursday Justice Stewart accepted expert evidence that such posts could quickly disappear from view, being overtaken by subsequent posts if not “pinned” on Instagram or made a “feature” on Facebook.

Justice Stewart found this was not onerous or unduly burdensome and that the educative purpose of the publication “contemplates some degree of promotion”.

“In short, the ‘pinning’ and ‘featuring’ of the posts will prevent them from disappearing from view in a short period of time, and it will prevent them from being deliberately buried by way of successive further posts,” Justice Stewart said.

“I do not regard it as disproportionate to the nature and extent of the wrong committed to require redress of that nature.”

ECAJ co-chief executive Peter Wertheim welcomed the decision, telling The Australian: “We see this as an essential part of counteracting the harm that was caused by their online promotion and reproduction of Haddad’s anti-Semitic speeches.”

Mr Haddad or speakers at the Al Madina Dawah Centre in southwest Sydney have called Jewish people “descendants of pigs and monkeys”, recited parables about their killing, and said people should “spit” on Israel so its citizens “would drown”.

Justice Stewart ordered Mr Haddad not to facilitate “words, sounds or images (being) communicated otherwise than in private, which attribute characteristics to Jewish people on the basis of their group membership and which convey any of the disparaging imputations identified as being conveyed by the lectures”.

Mr Haddad appeared defiant in the wake of the ruling, his lawyer declaring outside the court that “he maintains that he has the right to quote religious scripture, as all parties do, the court has found he has that right”.

Mr Wertheim said he would call Mr Haddad back to court for potential contempt should he breach the court orders against him, saying the outcome “vindicated” months of community action against anti-Semitism.

“Common decency should dictate that free speech and freedom of religion do not include the right to racially vilify other people. Common decency should tell us that that is where to draw the line,” Mr Wertheim said.

He argued the verdict indicated current federal criminal anti-vilification laws were insufficient.

“The original proposals for prosecution were never tested. Those prosecutions were never brought,” he said.

“So we don’t know whether stronger laws are needed, but if the authorities believe that those laws were not sufficient to prosecute in a case like this, or in the case of the Opera House steps and the chanting of ‘F the Jews’ and much worse, then clearly the laws are in need of reform.”

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/hate-preacher-cant-bury-courtordered-corrective-social-media-posts/news-story/02f04deeb0c52adaf0907f638e2fe126

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109344

File: aa4643d03eed421⋯.jpg (1.69 MB,1929x1286,3:2,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 420b15c042e465a⋯.jpg (1.72 MB,1980x1320,3:2,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 48b98c453d6e3da⋯.jpg (219.31 KB,1280x853,1280:853,Clipboard.jpg)

File: bb2c69970ecadee⋯.jpg (134.63 KB,1280x853,1280:853,Clipboard.jpg)

File: de73d4eaec1ae69⋯.jpg (189.26 KB,1280x853,1280:853,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23338506 (171034ZJUL25) Notable: Whitlam, Nixon, Albanese: PM uses Great Wall to place himself in history – Prime Minister Anthony Albanese marked his China trip with a symbolic stop at the Great Wall, drawing parallels with Gough Whitlam’s 1971 decision to open relations with Beijing ahead of US President Richard Nixon. “At the time, that was a controversial decision to recognise the People’s Republic of China,” he said, adding, “We are literally standing on history.” Acknowledging China had not democratised as hoped in Whitlam’s era, Albanese stressed his method: “We don’t shout with a megaphone,” contrasting with Scott Morrison’s confrontational style.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109325

>>109335

>>109337

Whitlam, Nixon, Albanese: PM uses Great Wall to place himself in history

Paul Sakkal - July 16, 2025

In case the symbolism wasn’t obvious, the prime minister spelled it out.

Standing on the Great Wall on a muggy Wednesday morning, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese placed himself in the long arc of Australia’s history of managing relations with China.

Labor icon Gough Whitlam, as opposition leader, went ahead of the United States in 1971 to open relations with China. He was followed by US President Richard Nixon’s establishment of engagement with China.

“At the time, that was a controversial decision to recognise the People’s Republic of China,” Albanese said, adding that it was also the correct one.

“I have the sense of history following in the footsteps of ... Gough Whitlam.

“We are literally standing on history.”

The prime minister referenced the US leadership of the time that Whitlam had risked upsetting.

Now, as then, Albanese faces pressure from Australia’s closest military and cultural partner, the US, to stick firmly by its side as he adds economic and diplomatic layers to the era of stabilisation with China which Labor kicked off in 2022.

China has failed to democratise in the way many in the West had hoped in Whitlam’s time. Albanese admitted he was dealing with a different beast, but said the best way to manage differences was to build as much trust as realistically possible.

“We don’t shout with a megaphone,” he remarked, referring to his predecessor Scott Morrison’s confrontational diplomatic style that drew China’s ire.

If chumminess is the name of the game, China knew which buttons to press when Albanese came to town.

The pub rock-loving PM was treated to Chinese covers of Powderfinger, Paul Kelly and Midnight Oil at dinner in Beijing’s Great Hall on Tuesday.

Power and the Passion was the Oils’ song played, according to Albanese. The lyrics from the activist band’s hit are pro-Whitlam and make jabs at “Uncle Sam” and the Pine Gap intelligence facility – all made in the context of paranoia around the US role in Whitlam’s 1975 dismissal.

Albanese and Xi were splashed on page one of the China Daily, a state media publication. Russia’s foreign minister, who met Xi on the same day as the PM, was relegated to page three despite Russia’s “no limits” relationship with China.

“They did the full kit and caboodle,” Albanese said. “And so, it was a splendid occasion.”

It’s hard to see how China’s wooing of Albanese makes ambassador Kevin Rudd’s job easier in Washington as he works to preserve the AUKUS pact in talks with the China hawks in the Trump administration.

The Great Wall, usually jammed with tourists, was cleared for Albanese’s visit. Freeways across Shanghai and Beijing were closed off for the prime minister’s motorcades, with Australian flags lining the streets.

After a short press conference – decked in his Rabbitohs cap and tennis shoes – Albanese went for a walk up the wall with a tour guide and fiancee Jodie Haydon.

Once the money shot was in view, he took off his Ray-Bans, asked the guide and translator to move aside, shooed reporters and assorted hangers-on out of the way, cleared the path ahead of him for what he clearly expects will become an iconic photo in the same stretch of the wall as Whitlam.

Even while feeling the weight of history, Albanese had his nuptials on his mind after photographers captured the scenic shot.

“Anyone here a celebrant?” he asked with a smirk.

https://www.theage.com.au/politics/federal/whitlam-nixon-albanese-pm-uses-great-wall-to-place-himself-in-history-20250716-p5mfd4.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109345

File: 8b2f466d34cfa1e⋯.jpg (1.85 MB,6000x4000,3:2,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23338525 (171039ZJUL25) Notable: Albanese says Taiwan ‘status quo’ remains after questions on Chinese media report – Prime Minister Anthony Albanese dismissed Chinese state media claims that he opposed Taiwan’s independence, clarifying: “What we do is continue to support a one-China policy. We support the status quo. By definition. We don’t support any unilateral action on Taiwan.” He said Australia’s stance meant Taiwan should not declare independence unilaterally and China should not seize the island without talks. Albanese also stood firm on Labor’s plan to end Landbridge’s Darwin Port lease, while Chinese Premier Li Qiang urged fairer treatment for Chinese investment.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109325

>>109335

>>109337

Albanese says Taiwan ‘status quo’ remains after questions on Chinese media report

Paul Sakkal - July 16, 2025

1/2

Beijing: Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has played down claims he declared Australia’s opposition to Taiwanese independence in a meeting with President Xi Jinping as the Chinese government dials up pressure over Labor’s decision to take back the Port of Darwin.

After Premier Li Qiang said the country expected its companies to be treated fairly when they invested overseas, a state media outlet made clear Beijing’s anger at Canberra’s commitment in April to have the port sold by its owner, Chinese company Landbridge, over national security concerns.

“At present, there are specific issues between China and Australia that need to be discussed, such as the lease of Darwin Port and the expansion of the China-Australia Free Trade Agreement,” the Global Times wrote in an editorial on Wednesday.

But it hailed a major improvement in relations between Australia and China that Albanese basked in on Wednesday as he spoke to reporters from the historic Great Wall.

“I have the sense of history following in the footsteps of the Labor prime minister Gough Whitlam, who was the first prime minister to visit here in 1973,” he said. “We are literally standing on history.”

Albanese said the port issue – Landbridge has repeatedly said the port is not for sale – had not come up in his meetings with Chinese leaders, but the government would stay consistent on the issue. “My position hasn’t changed over a long period of time,” he said.

China Daily, another state media publication, had earlier claimed Albanese told Xi on Tuesday that Australia did not support Taiwanese independence. “[Albanese] assured Xi that Australia adheres to the one-China policy and does not support ‘Taiwan independence’,” the outlet reported.

Albanese said after the meeting on Tuesday he had conveyed to Xi that Australia supported Taiwan’s current position. The island is a self-governing democratic island of more than 23 million people that maintains informal diplomatic-style ties to Australia. China considers Taiwan to be part of the country’s territory.

“You’re trying to quote a Chinese readout that I haven’t seen,” Albanese said at a press conference on Wednesday in response to a question about his reported position. “What we do is continue to support a one-China policy. We support the status quo. By definition. We don’t support any unilateral action on Taiwan.”

The status quo, in Australia’s view, is that Taiwan should not declare independence unilaterally and China should not retake the island without negotiations.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109346

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23338548 (171046ZJUL25) Notable: Video: Bamboo-zled: Albanese embraces China’s panda diplomacy – On the final day of his China visit, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese toured Chengdu’s panda research base with fiancée Jodie Haydon, calling the pandas housed at Adelaide Zoo “a great sign of friendship between China and Australia.” The Chengdu facility manages China’s panda loans, a long-running tool of “panda diplomacy.” Analysts note the practice has grown “more hard-headed,” with pandas leased rather than gifted, extending Beijing’s influence. Adelaide Zoo pays about $780,000 annually, while cubs born abroad must be returned to China by age four, ensuring pandas remain a symbol of Chinese ownership and soft power.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109325

>>109335

>>109337

Bamboo-zled: Albanese embraces China’s panda diplomacy

BEN PACKHAM - 17 July 2025

Sixteen-year-old giant panda Da Mao chewed lazily on a succulent bamboo shoot as Anthony Albanese, Jodie Haydon and their motley retinue gawked at him through the glass at Chengdu’s sprawling panda park.

On the final day of his record-length visit to China, the Prime Minister cast aside concerns he could be labelled a “panda hugger”, opting to soak up China’s famous “panda diplomacy”.

“They’ve been like this for thousands of years!” he marvelled as he toured the Chengdu Research Base of Giant Panda Breeding.

The facility is the largest of its kind in China, co-ordinating the country’s panda loans to its favoured partner nations, including Australia.

Last year, Adelaide Zoo received two new pandas, Xing Qiu and Yi Lan, in recognition of the stabilisation of the Australia-China relationship under Labor.

Albanese and Heydon stopped by to visit one of the pandas they replaced, Fu Ni, who was enjoying her retirement in one of the centre’s outside enclosures.

“Our Adelaide Zoo pandas are a great sign of friendship between China and Australia,” the PM gushed.

China has been using its pandas as a soft diplomacy tool since the 1950s. But the practice has a hard edge.

Da Mao and another panda, Er Shun, were returned from Canada in 2020, before their 10-year contract was up, due to a slowing of bamboo shipments from China.

Beijing blamed the Covid-19 pandemic, but the pandas’ return came amid a breakdown in relations between the countries over Ottawa’s arrest of Huawei executive Meng Wanzhou, and China’s retaliatory detention of the “Two Michaels” – Michael Spavor and Michael Kovrig.

Lowy Institute North Asia fellow Richard McGregor said Beijing’s panda diplomacy had become “more hard-headed” in recent years.

“They are rarely gifted anymore,” he said.

“Instead they are leased or lent, which means their diplomatic weight has a longer shelf life.”

Adelaide Zoo’s pandas cost about $780,000 a year to keep, or about $15,000 a week, according to federal budget papers.

While pandas are famously uninterested in sex, at least in captivity, any born in overseas zoos are deemed to be Chinese and, under the terms set by Beijing, must be returned to their home country by the age of four.

The US received its first two pandas from China in 1972, after Richard Nixon’s first trip to China, symbolising the “opening up” of the country to the world.

“Symbolism is a central part of Chinese culture and diplomacy,” Georgetown University animal diplomacy expert Barbara Bodine said in a 2024 article on the subject.

“They are often referred to as a ‘seal’, agreed to once China turns a corner with a country, be it in diplomatic, trade or security matters.

“This was especially important during the early phases of China’s opening up when countries were interested in certainty amid this new phase of Chinese communism.

“Pandas really did make a difference, but primarily as a symbolic tool.”

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/bamboozled-albanese-embraces-chinas-panda-diplomacy/news-story/22960b80c87ce8a592c5d72e3910fd48

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bbiPmEVbVr4

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109347

File: 3adb34175ca5e28⋯.jpg (185.75 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 020b88938cf4b15⋯.jpg (209.34 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23338565 (171053ZJUL25) Notable: John Bolton says the fate of AUKUS should be resolved before Albanese meets Trump – Former US national security adviser John Bolton warned Anthony Albanese against seeking a White House meeting with Donald Trump before the Pentagon’s AUKUS review is finalised, saying the deal could be derailed. Bolton said Elbridge Colby’s request for an Australian commitment on Taiwan carried “huge diplomatic consequences” and should be handled at leader level. He urged Australia to secure clarity on AUKUS before pursuing a meeting, citing Trump’s record of abandoning agreements. Bolton also called for higher defence spending by both nations and questioned Trump’s resolve to defend Taiwan.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>73662 (pb)

>>109299

>>109316

>>109318

John Bolton says the fate of AUKUS should be resolved before Albanese meets Trump

JOE KELLY - 17 July 2025

1/2

Former US national security adviser John Bolton says a meeting between Anthony Albanese and Donald Trump before the future of the AUKUS review is resolved could backfire and even endanger the deal.

Mr Bolton, who served as NSA in the first Trump administration from 2018-19, said he thought it was possible the US could back out of or place new conditions on the AUKUS agreement.

Speaking to The Australian, he suggested a breakdown in the presidential decision-making process had also empowered the Pentagon’s policy chief, Elbridge Colby, who is leading the AUKUS review.

However, Mr Bolton said it was hard to say how seriously its findings would be taken.

Mr Bolton said it was unlikely the Australian Prime Minister’s visit to China and fourth meeting with Xi Jinping would have seriously registered with the US President, questioning Mr Trump’s own focus on the strategic threat posed by Beijing.

He saw no obvious benefit for Mr Albanese in rushing off to Washington to obtain an Oval Office meeting with Mr Trump, pushing back on arguments that forging a personal relationship at the leader-to-leader level would assist Australia’s case when it came to AUKUS.

“Who knows what he’ll say?” Mr Bolton said. “Ask Volodymyr Zelensky how that can go. Or Cyril Ramaphosa from South Africa. You really want to do that?”

“It’s a signal of how damaging Trump’s presidency can be to the United States – when foreign leaders have to think to themselves, do I really want to go to the White House and take a risk? Xi Jinping hasn’t done that.

“You can bet that the Chinese are not going to ask for a meeting until they know 110 per cent that it’s going to go according to script.”

However, Mr Bolton said the request from Mr Colby for an Australian precommitment of support for Taiwan in the event of a US conflict with China clearly had “huge diplomatic consequences”.

“Did anybody in the State Department hear about this? Was it cleared by the Secretary of State?” he said.

“Was it cleared through the National Security Council process? I bet you an American dollar right now the answer to that is ‘No’.”

Mr Bolton said this was a more appropriate conversation to have at the leader-to-leader level, and a possible reason for Mr Albanese to travel to Washington and “have a conversation in private (with Mr Trump); just the two of us about this – not some guy at the Pentagon”.

The question of when to meet with the US President presented Mr Albanese with “a difficult decision to make”.

A leading critic of Mr Trump, Mr Bolton argued there was a compelling case for Australia to lift its defence spending but also said the US should increase its own defence spending to 5 per cent of GDP.

“I think it is a matter of national security concern for Australia – its defence spending should go up,” he said. “I mean, the Solomon Islands are a lot closer to you all than they are to us.

“And we all share the problem of the of the Pacific island states and China’s efforts to increase its influence across the Pacific.”

Mr Bolton argued that the imposition of US tariffs was creating “enormous problems for the United States all around the world, particularly with its friends and allies” and should be seen as the worst economic decision in nearly a century.

He said there was also a precedent for Mr Trump in trying to dishonour agreements with Australia, pointing to the US President’s 2017 conversation with then-prime minister Malcolm Turnbull where he tried to abandon the refugee resettlement deal struck with Barack Obama.

Mr Bolton said Australia should instead come to a better understanding of the Pentagon review and do enough behind the scenes work to ensure a favourable outcome for the AUKUS agreement before a face-to-face meeting was arranged between Mr Albanese and Mr Trump.

“If I were in the Australian Prime Minister’s shoes, I would say AUKUS is the highest priority and I want to get that resolved the right way,” he said. “Clear up the ambiguity here and proceed with the program.

“And if we can do that without a face-to-face meeting, I’d prefer to do it. And then, once that’s resolved favourably, then go and ask for a meeting.

“Because, as Malcolm Turnbull found out, when he called up in the first term to ask for implementation of a refugee resettlement deal that had been made with Obama, Trump could say, ‘well, that’s not my deal. I didn’t make that deal. I’m not going to go through with that deal’.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109348

File: 2d506931036c37b⋯.jpg (178.61 KB,2047x1152,2047:1152,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 0303f02d2c67630⋯.jpg (321.56 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23347832 (190735ZJUL25) Notable: Great haul of China visit: PM spruiks ‘tangible outcomes’ – Anthony Albanese defended his six-night China trip against Coalition claims it was “indulgent,” insisting visits to the Great Wall and Chengdu’s panda park projected “respect” to over a billion Chinese and advanced Australia’s interests. He cited talks on steel decarbonisation with major iron ore producers, promotion of medtech firms such as Cochlear, and cultural initiatives like the Australian Open wildcard tournament in Chengdu. While China praised warmer ties, critics noted pressure over Darwin Port and PLA drills. Albanese said disagreements remain but dialogue strengthens cooperation.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109325

>>109335

>>109337

Great haul of China visit: PM spruiks ‘tangible outcomes’

BEN PACKHAM - July 17, 2025

1/2

Anthony Albanese has lashed ­Coalition claims his lengthy China trip was “indulgent”, saying he had demonstrated Australia’s “respect” to more than a billion Chinese people, while ­positioning his government to work through differences with Beijing.

On the final day of his record six-night visit, the Prime Minister said he had advanced Australia’s economic interests and strengthened ties with China’s top leaders, developing a “warm and friendly” relationship with Xi Jinping.

But as he prepared to fly home to Australia, Mr Albanese declined to say whether he trusted the Chinese President, declaring instead that Mr Xi was yet to break any commitments he had made to him.

Mr Albanese’s comments followed Coalition criticism on Thursday over his China itinerary, which included an excursion to the Great Wall of China to ­retrace Labor hero Gough Whitlam’s steps in 1971, and a picture opportunity at a panda breeding centre with ­fiancee Jodie Haydon.

Opposition finance spokesman James Paterson said it was hard to identify any “tangible outcomes” from the six-day trip, and that high-level visits were not for ­“personal enjoyment”.

“Frankly, I have to say that some of this is starting to look a ­little bit indulgent,” Senator Paterson said on Sky News.

“I mean, the appropriate time to do a nostalgic history tour of Labor Party mythology is after you retire, in your own time, at your own expense, not on the ­taxpayer dime.”

Mr Albanese hit back, arguing the visits to the popular tourist ­attractions had furthered Australia’s standing among everyday Chinese people.

“Those pictures go to 27 million people, potentially, in Australia. They go to over a billion people in China. And those billion people represent people who are increasingly rising up the income ladder and are potential tourists and therefore job creators in Australia,” he said.

“The Great Wall of China symbolises the extraordinary history and culture here in China, and showing a bit of respect to people never cost anything. But you know what it does? It gives you a reward.”

Mr Albanese rattled off what he said were the outcomes of the visit, including talks on steel decarbonisation between Chinese steelmakers and the heads of ­Australia’s top iron ore producers, and the promotion of Australian medical technology companies such as world-leading hearing aid manufacturer Cochlear.

The Prime Minister – who is yet to have a first meeting with US President ­Donald Trump – denied he had been “cosying up” to China while allowing the Australia-US relationship to languish.

“What we’ve had is constructive engagement. We have continued to be able to put forward Australia’s position,” he said.

“Will there be a circumstance when there is no disagreements? No, because we have different political systems, we have different cultures, we have different values.

“What I’d like to see is to be able to talk about those issues regularly, get as much agreement as possible, but (also) understanding of where our nations are coming from. Out of understanding can come greater co-operation.”

Mr Albanese has talked up the strength of the Australia-China economic relationship during the trip, which included lengthy meetings with President Xi and China’s No.2 leader, Premier Li Qiang, in Beijing, as well as stops in Shanghai and Chengdu for ­business-focused events.

Beijing was also upbeat, despite concerns over Australian investment rules and Labor’s vow to reclaim the Port of Darwin from a Chinese company, with Mr Xi ­saying China wanted “to push the bilateral relationship further”.

One of Australia’s foremost China experts, Swinburne Emeritus Professor John Fitzgerald, said the Chinese side would not be satisfied with the countries’ newly “stabilised” relationship, and would continue to push Australia for concessions.

“If all it takes to have a good ­relationship with Xi’s China is to smile, exchange compliments, and talk business, then PM Albanese is on to a good thing,” he said.

“Xi clearly expects more than that. He is likely to be disappointed.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109349

File: 91a29d4b204d9e2⋯.jpg (263.1 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 5693bb6ef3ed981⋯.jpg (243.83 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23347855 (190744ZJUL25) Notable: Australian investment in China stalls despite thawing of relationship – Australian direct investment in China has plunged 90% since 2019, standing at just $1.6bn in 2024, while Chinese investment in Australia also declined to $36.5bn. Anthony Albanese acknowledged the fall, blaming Covid and Morrison-era tensions, and called for “more direct investment here.” Visiting Cochlear’s $110m Chengdu plant, he praised its impact: “The idea that an Australian invention gives someone … who’s never heard the voice of their mum or dad … it’s amazing.” Yet security risks and coercion concerns continue to deter firms, with Crown, ANZ, and others scaling back.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109325

>>109335

>>109337

Australian investment in China stalls despite thawing of relationship

WILL GLASGOW - July 17, 2025

1/2

Australia’s direct investment in China has more than halved since Anthony Albanese was first elected in 2022, as companies remain concerned about heightened business risks and the Chinese economic growth rate has slowed.

The entire stock of Australian direct investment in China was only $1.6bn at the end of 2024, according to Australian Bureau of Statistics data.

Last year, Australian direct investment in China fell by more than 25 per cent from $2.1bn, according to the ABS. It has fallen every year since 2019, shrinking by almost 90 per cent from a peak of $15.5bn.

Chinese firms have also reduced their stock of direct investment in Australia every year since 2019, when China’s total stock peaked at $47.7bn. By the end of 2024 that had fallen 24 per cent to $36.5bn.

Even at that level, China has more than 20 times the direct investment in Australia compared to Australian direct investment in China.

The Prime Minister on Thursday said he wanted to see more direct investment into China when asked about the decline by The Australian.

Speaking at a press conference in Chengdu on the final full day of his six-night trip to China, the PM said there were both global and bilateral reasons for the fall since 2019.

“Covid had an impact on global economic investment, but also there were the specific issues during that term of the Morrison government,” Mr Albanese said.

“I want to see more direct investment here. It’s something that I’ve raised.”

Direct foreign investment requires high levels of trust because it entwines companies and their staff in the destination country and its legal system.

Despite the huge imbalance in investment levels, China’s government continues to complain about Australia’s foreign investment regimen, which it claims ­unfairly targets Chinese firms.

Premier Li Qiang on Tuesday repeated Beijing’s longstanding complaints in a meeting with the Prime Minister and senior Australian business figures.

“We hope that the Australian side will treat Chinese enterprises visiting Australia fairly and properly solve the problems encountered by enterprises in market access, investment review and other aspects,” Mr Li said.

On Thursday afternoon, the Prime Minister visited one of the rare investments by an Australian company in China in the past five years at listed hearing aid firm Cochlear’s factory in Chengdu.

He said it was a “great example” of the benefits of Australian investment to China.

“The idea that an Australian invention gives someone who has never heard the voice of their mum or dad, brother, sister – never heard the sound of airconditioning, the sound of the river, of birds tweeting. It’s amazing,” Mr Albanese said.

“We should be so proud of what we’re doing,” he said.

The Cochlear plant cost about $110m – almost a tenth of the total stock of direct Australian investment in China – and began production during the pandemic.

Sources at the world-leading company’s Chinese operation have told The Australian its operations were not affected by Beijing’s coercion campaign against the Morrison government.

The Sydney-headquartered company does not manufacture its most advanced products in China, a country with a long history of forced technology transfer.

Cochlear employs about 100 staff in China, a fraction of its total of more than 4000 staff, most of whom are based in Australia. But even at that modest level, it is one of Australia’s biggest employers in China.

Cochlear’s factory in Chengdu sits over the road from the headquarters of lithium producer ­Tianqi, which has invested more than $3bn in facilities in Western Australia.

In recent years, Tianqi has complained about its inability to increase its investment in Australia’s lithium sector, arguing that its expertise could help develop the critical minerals sector.

Mr Albanese did not visit Tianqi’s offices during his trip to Chengdu, the first by an Australian prime minister since Bob Hawke in 1986.

A senior representative from Tianqi attended the Australia-China business dialogue on Tuesday in Beijing’s Great Hall, where Mr Li and senior Chinese business figures raised concerns about Australia’s treatment of investment from China.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109350

File: 2b0aabe04e57847⋯.mp4 (14.89 MB,640x360,16:9,Clipboard.mp4)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23347937 (190824ZJUL25) Notable: Video: Albanese hits back at claims of ‘indulgent’ China trip, saying it will reap rewards – Wrapping up his six-night China tour in Chengdu, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese rejected Coalition criticism of panda visits and Great Wall photo-ops, saying “showing a little bit of respect to people never cost anything. But you know what it does? It gives you a reward.” He cited progress in green steel, tourism and medtech ties, while declining to say he “trusted” Xi Jinping, noting instead that “nothing that he has said to me has he not fulfilled.” Opposition MPs said the trip lacked outcomes on Darwin Port, detainees, and PLA drills.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109325

>>109335

>>109337

Albanese hits back at claims of ‘indulgent’ China trip, saying it will reap rewards

Paul Sakkal - July 17, 2025

1/2

Australia will reap economic rewards from showing respect for China, the prime minister has declared, shrugging off barbs from the Coalition that stops he made on his week-long trip to visit soccer coaches, historical landmarks and a tennis centre were self-indulgent.

Rounding out his trip on Thursday afternoon in the western Chinese city of Chengdu, Anthony Albanese said that images of him admiring pandas and walking the Great Wall were signs of reverence for China’s history that worked as marketing to the country’s massive consumer base.

“Showing a little bit of respect to people never cost anything. But you know what it does? It gives you a reward,” Albanese said.

But the limits of Labor’s stabilisation of the relationship with China were on show on Thursday, with Albanese facing Coalition criticism that the trip had not delivered tangible benefits, such as a guarantee Australia would get more notice of Chinese military exercises in nearby waters.

Asked if he trusted President Xi Jinping following Tuesday’s talks and banquet in Beijing’s Great Hall, Albanese chose not to use the word “trust”. “Nothing that he has said to me has he not fulfilled,” Albanese said.

Chinese navy ships circumnavigated Australia in February and used live ammunition in drills in the Tasman Sea, which is permitted under international law but disrupted flights that had been given little notice of the exercises.

Trade between Australia and China has recovered since the Communist Party imposed strikes on beef, barley, lobsters and other commodities after the Morrison government criticised its assertive foreign police and handling of the coronavirus pandemic.

Figures from consultancy KPMG and the University of Sydney show Chinese investment in Australia increased from $US613 million in 2023 to $US862 million in 2024, well down on the peaks of the 2010s when it was regularly above $US10 billion.

Australian Bureau of Statistics numbers show total Australian capital invested in China has fallen from $70 billion in 2021 to $58 billion this year.

Trumpeting his more than two hours of talks with Xi, Albanese flagged more two-way investment after years of falling Australian inflows into China, along with new tie-ups in green steel and tourism.

But as Albanese prepared to conclude his trip, political focus will shift swiftly from Australia’s place in the world to domestic affairs, with parliament to sit next week for the first time since the May election.

As the government spotlighted its focus on trade and tourism ties with China this week, it faced questions about how it was handling its relationship with the erratic Trump administration, which will likely be a theme of parliament next week alongside Labor’s election promises on university fee cuts and free childcare.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109351

File: 61a60d5e658a3d0⋯.mp4 (6.93 MB,406x720,203:360,Clipboard.mp4)

File: a5fd8dc3cc86a69⋯.jpg (125.71 KB,1200x720,5:3,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23347968 (190844ZJUL25) Notable: Video: Australian PM says dialogue with China matters for Australian economy, regional security"Dialogue with China matters. For jobs, our economy and the security of our region," visiting Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said in a post on X platform on Friday. "One in four Australian jobs depends upon our trade and the most important trading partner is China. We have worked very hard to stabilize the relationship that brought benefits with over $20 billion of trade resuming." The goal of Albanese's visit to China can be summarized as seeking progress while maintaining stability, as he aims to advance the stability and development of China-Australia relations through dialogue, Chen Hong, director of the Asia Pacific Studies Centre at East China Normal University, told the Global Times on Friday. "Given the current turbulence and uncertainty in the international situation, both China and Australia, along with other regional countries, hope to work together to pursue predictability and stability," Chen added. " – Chen Qingqing, Global Times

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109325

>>109335

>>109337

Australian PM says dialogue with China matters for Australian economy, regional security

Chen Qingqing - Jul 18, 2025

"Dialogue with China matters. For jobs, our economy and the security of our region," visiting Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said in a post on X platform on Friday.

"One in four Australian jobs depends upon our trade and the most important trading partner is China. We have worked very hard to stabilize the relationship that brought benefits with over $20 billion of trade resuming. We signed agreements for further two way trade and in addition to that, we agreed on the promotion of two way tourism as well," Albanese said in a video attached with the post.

Albanese's China trip, which began Saturday and ends on Friday, is extraordinarily long compared with Australian state visits over the past decade and marks a normalization of bilateral relations that plumbed new depths under the previous Australian government's nine-year reign, AP reported on Thursday.

According to an official statement published on Australian government website on Friday, Albanese's visit was an opportunity to continue advancing Australia's security and economic interests. Wise management of this relationship is crucial for Australia's future prosperity and for the security of our nation and the stability of our region.

"Australia's approach to our relationship with China remains patient, calibrated and deliberate. Dialogue is central to a stable and constructive relationship," the statement said.

During Albanese's visit, China and Australia signed a memorandum of understanding (MoU) on the implementation and review of China-Australia Free Trade Agreement on Tuesday, according to the Chinese Ministry of Commerce (MOFCOM), Xinhua reported.

As 2025 marks the 10th anniversary of the agreement, the two countries will maintain close cooperation, continue high-quality implementation of the agreement, and jointly conduct a review to identify areas for further improvement or expansion, the MOFCOM said.

The goal of Albanese's visit to China can be summarized as seeking progress while maintaining stability, as he aims to advance the stability and development of China-Australia relations through dialogue, Chen Hong, director of the Asia Pacific Studies Centre at East China Normal University, told the Global Times on Friday.

"Given the current turbulence and uncertainty in the international situation, both China and Australia, along with other regional countries, hope to work together to pursue predictability and stability," Chen added.

Albanese paid an official visit to China from July 12 to 18, traveling to Shanghai and Beijing, with Chengdu being the final leg of his trip.

Bloomberg said Albanese's six-day visit to China was a diplomatic reset that marks the full restoration of trade ties after years of friction. While the trip was framed around economics, the stakes were far broader, as tensions simmer over Taiwan question, defense, and Australia's balancing act between its biggest trading partner and its key security ally, the US, according to the US media outlet.

The future of China-Australia relations will be on a positive trajectory. However, what Australia needs to do is to eliminate external interference, particularly from third parties and domestic right-wing forces, in order to work with China to ensure that the bilateral relationship remains stable and sustainable, Chen noted. "Only with stability can long-term progress be achieved, and stability is the foundation for realizing ambitious goals."

https://www.globaltimes.cn/page/202507/1338655.shtml

https://x.com/AlboMP/status/1945985579076002142

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109352

File: a50027acd7a3447⋯.jpg (280.07 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 42cc6b4470c0433⋯.jpg (141.53 KB,2047x1152,2047:1152,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 1d8d3674c8c1976⋯.jpg (518.85 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23347997 (190858ZJUL25) Notable: ‘Beware of bully Xi Jinping’s strategy of flattery’, says Scott Morrison – Former prime minister Scott Morrison warned that Beijing was now seeking to “isolate us from the US charming and flattering us,” after previously trying to “isolate us from the US by bullying us.” He argued “China’s plan is to dominate, control the price, block out rivals … exactly what China has done on critical minerals and rare earths for 20 years.” Prime Minister Anthony Albanese insisted his six-day trip produced “constructive engagement,” saying a “stable and constructive relationship with China is in Australia’s national interest,” while critics questioned whether tangible gains were delivered.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109335

>>109337

>>109351

‘Beware of bully Xi Jinping’s strategy of flattery’, says Scott Morrison

SARAH ISON and GREG SHERIDAN - 18 July 2025

1/2

Scott Morrison says China is “charming and flattering” ­Anthony Albanese in an attempt to isolate Australia from the ­US, arguing a change in approach from Beijing since lifting its trade sanctions did not alter its underlying motives to “block out rivals”.

As a former George W. Bush adviser warns of growing divisiveness between the US and Australia, fuelling Coalition demands the Prime Minister urgently prioritise is relationship in Washington, foreign affairs experts ­observed Mr Albanese was ­becoming increasingly “confident about warming up ties with China without paying any domestic political price”.

However, as the prime minister who weathered the worst of Beijing’s trade sanctions in recent times, Mr Morrison issued a stark warning over Xi Jinping’s change of tack since Labor took power.

“China’s plan back then was to isolate us from the US by bullying us,” Mr Morrison told The Australian. “Their plan now is to isolate us from the US charming and flattering us.”

The comments from the former Coalition leader came as he reflected on the series of strict trade sanctions on products including beef, wine and barley that were enforced by China in 2020, after Australia became one of the first countries to openly demand an independent inquiry into the origins of Covid-19.

Despite the last of those sanctions being removed in 2024, Mr Morrison said it was clear Beijing was still seeking to exert its trade dominance over other countries.

“China’s plan is to dominate, control the price, block out rivals,” he said. “China massively subsidises production to block out competitors and this gives them their dominant position. This is exactly what China has done on critical minerals and rare earths for 20 years.”

While refusing to say explicitly whether or not he trusted the Chinese President, Mr Albanese reiterated that he and Mr Xi shared mutual respect and that his trip across China had resulted in “constructive engagement” between the two parties.

The Prime Minister compared this to circumstances under the Coalition government, which hadn’t managed “a phone conversation between a single minister in Australia and our major trading partner”.

“This visit marks another important step in the Australia-China relationship. A stable and constructive relationship with China is in Australia’s national interest,” Mr Albanese said on Friday ahead of returning to Australia at the end of his six-day China visit. “Strengthening our security and economic interests with our largest trading partner will boost Australian jobs and support Australian businesses. I used my engagements in China to advocate for Australia’s interests including on trade, consular, human rights and regional and global issues.”

Mr Albanese denied he had been “cosying up” to China, during what was his second official visit to the country, while allowing the Australia-US relationship to languish.

But former Defence Department analyst and critic of the AUKUS agreement Hugh White said while the Labor leader had clearly wanted to “avoid the ­appearance of going too far with China” in his first term, that sentiment had changed.

“He has moved on from that. I believe this is a significant visit ­because it shows Albanese far more confident about warming up ties with China without paying any domestic political price,” Professor White told The Australian’s Inquirer.

The comments come amid ongoing Coalition criticism of Mr Albanese’s trip, which opposition trade spokesman Kevin Hogan on Friday called a “working holiday” that had not achieved any tangible outcomes.

Despite declaring it was clear that China “got what it wanted” from the Prime Minister’s visit, Professor White said he didn’t believe what the CCP had wanted “has been to Australia’s disadvantage”.

He did note, however, that China’s “fundamental ambition” was to push the US out of Asia and take its place. “No matter how we manage this day-to-day diplomatic tension and how successfully we manage it, the fundamental conflict remains the same,” he said.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109353

File: 7de53de20f6ae68⋯.jpg (187.57 KB,1280x720,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 5f07148a402b755⋯.jpg (174.41 KB,1400x787,1400:787,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23348101 (191006ZJUL25) Notable: AUKUS port purchases alarm: fears of Chinese Communist Party links – Companies tied to Shanghai businessman Wang Yongxin, president of the Shanghai Xinyang Chamber of Commerce, have purchased properties near Port Kembla and Newcastle, both shortlisted as potential AUKUS submarine bases. The chamber hosts CCP-related events and has links to the United Front, though Wang’s family denies any connection, calling the acquisitions “purely a commercial investment.” Experts Peter Jennings and Clive Hamilton warned of serious security risks, with Jennings saying “China’s No.1 intelligence target in Australia will be anything to do with AUKUS and nuclear submarines.”

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109299

>>109316

>>109336

AUKUS port purchases alarm: fears of Chinese Communist Party links

JACK QUAIL - July 17, 2025

1/2

Companies controlled by the ­family of a Shanghai businessman with connections to the Chinese Communist Party’s foreign ­influence arm have purchased two commercial properties located within port precincts earmarked for AUKUS submarine bases.

As Beijing ramps up pressure on Canberra to stop the Port of Darwin from being prised from Chinese hands, The Australian can reveal that Chinese businessman Wang Yongxin, president of the Shanghai Xinyang Chamber of Commerce, is tied to property deals at the Kembla and New­castle ports.

The chamber has links to China’s Communist Party and hosts party-related events, according to its WeChat channel, raising the spectre it is linked to the ­United Front – the Communist Party’s organisational effort to turn opinion at home and abroad in Beijing’s favour.

Both the Kembla and New­castle ports were shortlisted by the Defence Department in 2023 for a future east coast submarine base that would serve as the home port for Royal Australian Navy nuclear-powered submarines and support allied visits from the UK and the US.

It is unclear whether the two acquisitions were subject to ­approval processes by the Foreign Investment Review Board, with the Treasury Department not responding to questions about the matter sent in early July.

Mr Wang’s son and director of the company that purchased the Port Kembla site, Wang Zhongdong, said the acquisitions were “commercial investments” in green energy and emphatically denied any link to China’s United Front Work Department.

At nearly 220,000sq m, the Port Kembla site – formerly home to a copper smelter – was acquired by Port Kembla Group in January and is located adjacent to the port.

As director, Wang Zhongdong’s address is listed at a luxury apartment in the Crown Residences at Sydney’s Barangaroo Tower One, according to ASIC records. Transfer documents value the property at more than $10.5m.

Port Kembla Group also lists businessman Jian Chen as a director, while Binggang Jiang, ­secretary-general of the Australia-China Environmental Protection Association, holds a 15 per cent stake. Wang Yongxin also serves as president of that association.

In addition, Mr Wang is connected to a 70,000sq m property in New­castle, owned by Ausdragon Holdings Pty Ltd, which is located less than 500m from the port and was purchased late last year.

On the day the company was incorporated, Mr Wang was listed as its director, before he immediately transferred ownership to his daughter, Wang Rui, who remains the sole director. While serving as director, Mr Wang was registered to the Barangaroo apartment, and he retains directorship of a separate company, Newport International ­Investments Pty Ltd, at that same address.

Peter Jennings, a former executive director of the Australian Strategic Policy Institute, said the port acquisitions were of “serious concern” and called on Canberra to scrap the deal if United Front links were confirmed. “China’s No.1 intelligence target in Australia will be anything to do with AUKUS and nuclear submarines,” he said.

“We’ve had lots of experience of having to … fight them away from the Osborne precinct in South Australia.”

Mr Jennings said he would be “appalled” if the FIRB had greenlit the acquisitions. “This is how China operates and yet we just seem to be in this naive space where you know property purchases or businesses being purchased by Chinese companies are thought to be just commerce – those deals drive back to the interests and priorities of the Chinese Communist Party,” he said.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109354

File: 8d18adbc2e8e647⋯.jpg (77.44 KB,1280x719,1280:719,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 612ea12dfc77cbe⋯.jpg (270.45 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23348117 (191017ZJUL25) Notable: Gaza woman living in Sydney released from detention after ASIO security risk ruling – Palestinian grandmother Maha Almassri, 61, dubbed “Gaza Gran,” was released from Villawood detention a week after ASIO deemed her a security risk and her bridging visa was cancelled. Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke’s office declined to explain, citing national security, while noting no previous adverse assessments had led to visas being reinstated. Opposition spokesman Andrew Hastie called the handling “shambolic,” demanding answers on how she could be freed. Her family denies she failed the “character test” and supporters protested outside Burke’s office.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109287

Gaza woman living in Sydney released from detention after ASIO security risk ruling

Protests broke out at Tony Burke’s office last week when Maha Almassri, 61, was detained – now she’s been set free.

Lachlan Leeming and Thomas Sargeant - July 18, 2025

The Opposition has accused the Albanese Government of the “shambolic” handling of a Palestinian grandmother released from immigration detention a week after being deemed a security risk by ASIO.

It’s understood ‘Gaza Gran’ Maha Almassri, 61, was released from Villawood Immigration Detention Centre on Thursday.

Her release came a week after The Telegraph revealed Ms Almassri was taken into detention following a 5am raid on a Bankstown home, with a Department of Home Affairs letter seen by this publication stating her bridging visa was cancelled as she had failed the visa’s “character test”, a claim she denies.

The document states the department was “provided with an Adverse Security Assessment” by the Australian Security Intelligence Organisation (ASIO), which said the agency “assessed Ms Almassri to be directly or indirectly a risk to security”.

Ms Almassri’s current visa status is unclear, as is whether she remains in home or any other form of community detention.

Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke’s office said the government “will not be commenting on this cancellation”, but did say previous subjects of adverse security assessments had not had their visas reinstated.

“For people in Australia who have been given an adverse security assessment, none of them have been given visas and they remain in detention in accordance with the Migration Act,” a spokesman said.

Coalition Home Affairs spokesman Andrew Hastie questioned how she had been let out of immigration detention following ASIO’s assessment.

“The Government’s handling of this process has been shambolic from start to finish,” he said.

“How is it that this individual posed such a security risk the Minister cancelled their visa, and yet a week later they are free in the Australian community?

“Australians deserve answers. This is the same Labor Government that issued thousands of tourist visas to people from Gaza … before the proper security checks were undertaken, and with no plan for what to do once they arrived in Australia.

“It is little wonder Australians have lost confidence in Labor’s ability to manage immigration and national security.”

The document seen following Ms Almassri’s detention last week included that she “does not pass the character test” – a claim fiercely denied by her family, who alongside supporters launched a snap rally outside Mr Burke’s office last Thursday.

The reasons for Ms Almassri’s detention are not known.

The spokesman for Mr Burke added “any information in the public domain is being supplied by the individual or her family and is not necessarily consistent with the information held by our intelligence and security agencies”.

“The Australian government doesn’t stop investigating new information about a visa holder just because they are onshore. There is nothing more important to this Government than the safety of the Australian community,” he said.

Alison Battisson, a lawyer acting for Ms Almassri, was contacted for comment.

https://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/news/nsw/gaza-woman-living-in-sydney-released-from-detention-after-asio-security-risk-ruling/news-story/3fc6f01e49943ffa2f339163c4ecdca4

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109355

File: 9d0a59bcea04ca8⋯.jpg (2.53 MB,5000x3995,1000:799,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 1746eb03eb2b6f2⋯.jpg (1.01 MB,3280x2187,3280:2187,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 07e1bf5f33324b2⋯.jpg (813.15 KB,1100x794,550:397,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 793b3ad106a0603⋯.jpg (235.39 KB,1100x294,550:147,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23348169 (191048ZJUL25) Notable: Trump threatens to sue Murdoch over Wall Street Journal report alleging 50th birthday letter to Epstein – US President Donald Trump denied a Wall Street Journal report that he wrote a sexually suggestive letter to Jeffrey Epstein, calling it “a FAKE letter, supposedly to Epstein … These are not my words, not the way I talk. Also, I don’t draw pictures.” He said he warned Rupert Murdoch and editor Emma Tucker, but “they are going with a false, malicious, and defamatory story anyway.” Trump vowed to sue and asked Attorney-General Pam Bondi to unseal Epstein grand jury transcripts, declaring: “This SCAM … should end, right now!”

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109289

Trump threatens to sue Murdoch over Wall Street Journal report alleging 50th birthday letter to Epstein

abc.net.au - 18 July 2025

1/2

US President Donald Trump says he plans to sue media mogul Rupert Murdoch and News Corp over a report in The Wall Street Journal that claims he wrote a sexually suggestive birthday letter to convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.

In a post to his Truth Social platform on Thursday, Mr Trump denied the story and condemned the Murdoch-owned newspaper's reporting of what he called "a FAKE letter, supposedly to Epstein".

The paper reported that Epstein had been gifted a leather-bound book of "bawdy" letters from associates for his 50th birthday in 2003, including a letter bearing Mr Trump's name alongside a drawing of a naked woman.

"The Wall Street Journal printed a FAKE letter, supposedly to Epstein. These are not my words, not the way I talk. Also, I don't draw pictures," the president said in his Truth Social post.

"I told Rupert Murdoch it was a Scam, that he shouldn't print this Fake Story. But he did, and now I'm going to sue his ass off, and that of his third rate newspaper."

Shortly after his first post on the issue, Mr Trump said he had asked Attorney-General Pam Bondi to produce any and all "pertinent" grand jury testimony related to the Epstein case, a move that would fall well short of what has been demanded by even his own supporters.

"Based on the ridiculous amount of publicity given to Jeffrey Epstein, I have asked Attorney General Pam Bondi to produce any and all pertinent Grand Jury testimony, subject to Court approval," he wrote.

"This SCAM, perpetuated by the Democrats, should end, right now!"

Shortly after Mr Trump's statement, Ms Bondi said on X that the Justice Department was ready to ask the court on Friday, local time, to unseal the grand jury transcripts.

"President Trump - we are ready to move the court tomorrow to unseal the grand jury transcripts," she wrote.

Epstein, a financier and convicted sex offender, died in prison in 2019.

Report alleges Trump wrote of 'wonderful secret' in birthday letter

Mr Trump wrote on Truth Social that the White House had warned Mr Murdoch about the validity of the letter, but that the newspaper had gone ahead with the story anyway.

"Mr. Murdoch stated that he would take care of it but, obviously, did not have the power to do so," the statement said.

"The Editor of The Wall Street Journal, Emma Tucker, was told directly by Karoline Leavitt, and by President Trump, that the letter was a FAKE, but Emma Tucker didn't want to hear that. Instead, they are going with a false, malicious, and defamatory story anyway."

The letter was reportedly collected by Epstein's partner, disgraced British socialite Ghislaine Maxwell, as part of a birthday album for Epstein years before the wealthy financier was first arrested in 2006 and subsequently had a falling-out with Mr Trump.

The letter, which bears Mr Trump's name, includes text framed by the outline of what appears to be a hand-drawn naked woman and ends with, "Happy Birthday — and may every day be another wonderful secret," according to the newspaper.

The outlet described the contents of the letter, but did not publish a photo showing it entirely.

The ABC has contacted News Corp for further comment.

Maxwell was arrested in 2020 and convicted a year later on charges that she helped Epstein lure girls to be sexually abused.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109356

File: b5c8bb55fc51167⋯.jpg (211.84 KB,960x1200,4:5,Clipboard.jpg)

File: d361e6af0abd6a7⋯.jpg (229.86 KB,1280x1280,1:1,Clipboard.jpg)

File: aec1cfe472c4bec⋯.jpg (174.81 KB,1280x852,320:213,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23348173 (191051ZJUL25) Notable: Jeffrey Epstein’s Friends Sent Him Bawdy Letters for a 50th Birthday Album. One Was From Donald Trump. - The leather-bound book was compiled by Ghislaine Maxwell. The president says the letter ‘is a fake thing.’ - Khadeeja Safdar and Joe Palazzolo - July 17, 2025 - The Wall Street Journal

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109355

2/2

Epstein client list sparks growing MAGA rift

The latest controversy comes amid a growing rift within the president's Make America Great Again (MAGA) Republican coalition over the Epstein files, and a reported "client list" the FBI says does not exist.

The FBI announced last week it would not release any further documents related to Epstein or his suicide in a New York jail cell.

On Thursday, Mr Trump labelled many of his supporters "stupid" and "weaklings" for believing what he describes as the "Jeffrey Epstein hoax".

In his Truth Social post, the US president compared claims of an Epstein client list to other high-profile sagas, including allegations Russia interfered in the 2016 election.

Mr Trump has previously pointed the blame at the Democrats for peddling the story.

"The Radical Left Democrats have hit pay dirt, again!"

Mr Trump knew Epstein socially in the 1990s and early 2000s.

During the 2021 trial of Epstein's associate Ghislaine Maxwell, the financier's long-time pilot, Lawrence Visoski, testified that Mr Trump flew on Epstein's private plane multiple times.

Mr Trump has denied ever being on the plane, and has not been accused of any wrongdoing.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-07-18/trump-moves-to-unseal-transcripts-from-epstein-case/105546530

https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/114871422727186590

https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/114871752316281496

Jeffrey Epstein’s Friends Sent Him Bawdy Letters for a 50th Birthday Album. One Was From Donald Trump.

The leather-bound book was compiled by Ghislaine Maxwell. The president says the letter ‘is a fake thing.’

Khadeeja Safdar and Joe Palazzolo - July 17, 2025

https://archive.is/20250719091533/https://www.wsj.com/politics/trump-jeffrey-epstein-birthday-letter-we-have-certain-things-in-common-f918d796

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109357

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23348211 (191113ZJUL25) Notable: Video: ‘I’m going to sue his ass off’: Trump turns on Murdoch over Epstein story – US President Donald Trump vowed to sue Rupert Murdoch’s Wall Street Journal after it reported he wrote Jeffrey Epstein a cryptic 2003 birthday letter “framed by the outline of a naked woman.” The Journal alleged Trump’s text read: “A pal is a wonderful thing. Happy Birthday – and may every day be another wonderful secret.” Trump called it a “FAKE letter” and accused Murdoch of a “Scam,” with Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt labelling it a smear. Amid MAGA rifts over Epstein, Trump reversed course and asked Attorney-General Pam Bondi to seek release of grand jury testimony.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109355

‘I’m going to sue his ass off’: Trump turns on Murdoch over Epstein story

Michael Koziol - July 18, 2025

Harrisburg: US President Donald Trump says he will sue the Murdoch-owned Wall Street Journal for a story claiming he wrote a cryptic letter – with an “outline of a naked woman” – to now-convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein for the late financier’s 50th birthday.

Meanwhile, as the furore over the Epstein saga grew, especially among MAGA supporters, Trump reversed course and asked his attorney-general to release more documents related to the case, pending court approval.

The Journal reported Trump had signed a letter in a leather-bound book organised by Epstein’s friend Ghislaine Maxwell in 2003, and that the book formed part of the files examined by the Justice Department during its sex-trafficking investigation of Epstein and Maxwell.

Trump’s letter was “framed by the outline of a naked woman”, the newspaper reported, including small arcs depicting her breasts. The text reportedly took the form of an imagined conversation between the two men.

Donald: “We have certain things in common, Jeffrey.”

Jeffrey: “Yes, we do, come to think of it.”

Donald: “Enigmas never age, have you noticed that?”

Jeffrey: “As a matter of fact, it was clear to me the last time I saw you.”

Donald: “A pal is a wonderful thing. Happy Birthday – and may every day be another wonderful secret.”

Trump and Epstein were friends in the 1990s and mixed in the same New York finance circles. But Trump has maintained their relationship deteriorated at some point in the following decade and at times has claimed he only “knew” Epstein and was “not a fan”.

Ahead of the Journal’s story being published, rumours swirled in Washington that the paper was about to publish a significant story about the president and Epstein, who died in prison in 2019 at the age of 66.

Trump denied he wrote the letter or drew the picture in the Epstein birthday book.

“The Wall Street Journal printed a FAKE letter, supposedly to Epstein,” he posted on Truth Social.

“These are not my words, not the way I talk. Also, I don’t draw pictures.

“I told Rupert Murdoch it was a Scam, that he shouldn’t print this Fake Story. But he did, and now I’m going to sue his ass off, and that of his third rate newspaper.”

The Australian-born Murdoch bought the storied business newspaper from the Bancroft family in 2007. It is part of the News Corp empire now run by his son Lachlan.

White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt released a statement accusing the Journal of a “hatchet job”, and doubling down on Trump’s denials of the document’s veracity.

“The WSJ refused to show us the letter and conceded they don’t even have it in their possession when we asked them to verify the alleged document they’re basing their ENTIRE fake story on,” she said.

“When has President Trump ever spoken like the conversation alleged in the fake WSJ story? That’s not at all how he speaks or writes.”

Leavitt accused the newspaper of knowingly publishing a smear against the president and said there was a “co-ordinated hoax” at play by the Democrats and the “fake news”.

The Wall Street Journal declined to comment.

The story comes at a critical time for Trump, amid ructions in his MAGA base over the Epstein affair and the administration’s refusal to release more documents related to the investigation.

A contingent of MAGA supporters believes Epstein did not kill himself in prison but was murdered as part of a “deep state” ploy to cover up his crimes and protect members of the liberal elite.

The FBI and Department of Justice say there is no further credible information to provide, no evidence Epstein met foul play, and no evidence he kept a “client list”.

This week, Trump tried to draw a line under the saga and attacked his own supporters for buying into “bullshit” he said was spread by the Democrats to damage him.

But on Thursday night (Washington time) he changed course and said he had asked for more documents to be released.

“Based on the ridiculous amount of publicity given to Jeffrey Epstein, I have asked Attorney-General Pam Bondi to produce any and all pertinent Grand Jury testimony, subject to Court approval,” he posted on Truth Social.

“This SCAM, perpetuated by the Democrats, should end, right now!”

Bondi said she was ready to request that a court unseal the relevant documents as soon as Friday (Saturday AEST).

http://archive.today/msEoz

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UTIZ0C4IkMY

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109358

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23348233 (191129ZJUL25) Notable: Video: Trump taunts Murdoch as he files $15 billion lawsuit over Epstein story – US President Donald Trump has launched a $15.3 billion defamation suit in Miami against Rupert Murdoch, News Corp chief executive Robert Thomson, and The Wall Street Journal over a story alleging he wrote a cryptic, sexually suggestive letter to Jeffrey Epstein. Trump denounced it as a “FAKE letter” and pledged to “sue his ass off.” His lawyers said the report was fabricated to smear him. The Justice Department also asked a court to unseal Epstein grand jury transcripts. The Journal’s publisher, Dow Jones, said it would “vigorously defend” its reporting.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109355

>>109357

Trump taunts Murdoch as he files $15 billion lawsuit over Epstein story

Michael Koziol - July 19, 2025

1/2

Washington: US President Donald Trump has filed a defamation lawsuit against Rupert Murdoch and The Wall Street Journal, making good on his threat to sue over a story reporting that he signed a letter to Jeffrey Epstein for the disgraced financier’s 50th birthday.

The lawsuit was filed in a federal court in Miami less than 24 hours after the story was published last week. The filing – which names Murdoch, News Corp, chief executive Robert Thomson and the two reporters as defendants – says Trump is seeking $US10 billion ($15.3 billion) in damages, punitive damages, court costs and other relief.

“This historic legal action is being brought against the so-called authors of this defamation, the now fully disgraced WSJ, as well as its corporate owners and affiliates, with Rupert Murdoch and Robert Thomson (whatever his role is!) at the top of the list,” Trump posted on Truth Social.

The Australian-born Thomson is the long-serving chief executive of News Corp, based in New York. He was previously the editor-in-chief of Dow Jones, the News Corp subsidiary that publishes the Journal, and once worked at The Sydney Morning Herald, among other papers.

On Thursday (Friday AEST), the Journal reported Trump was among several Epstein associates who contributed a letter to a leather-bound book for the financier’s 50th birthday in 2003, organised by Epstein’s friend Ghislaine Maxwell.

The letter, which took the form of a cryptic, imagined conversation between the two men, was reportedly typed within a drawing of a naked woman, with two small arcs depicting her breasts. The exchange concluded: “Happy Birthday – and may every day be another wonderful secret.”

Trump denied writing the letter and claimed to have never drawn a picture in his life, though evidence quickly emerged disproving that claim. The Journal reported that Trump’s signature appeared below the woman’s waist, “mimicking pubic hair”.

The complaint filed in court alleged the defendants failed to attach the letter and drawing, failed to prove that Trump authored or signed such a letter, and failed to explain how the purported letter was obtained. In its story, the Journal did not claim to possess the documents, but said it had “reviewed” the letter.

“Defendants concocted this story to malign President Trump’s character and integrity and deceptively portray him in a false light,” Trump’s lawyers claimed in the complaint.

They also alleged the timing of the publication was malicious. Trump has been mired in controversy for two weeks regarding the administration’s refusal to release more documents related to the Epstein investigation.

Many of his core MAGA supporters are demanding the files be made public, alleging there is a “deep state” conspiracy to cover up Epstein’s high-profile acquaintances.

On Friday (Saturday AEST), the Trump administration asked a federal court to unseal grand jury transcripts related to the case amid pressure from Democrats and Republicans for more information to be made public.

“Transparency to the American public is of the utmost importance to this administration,” the Justice Department said in the filing, adding that “given the public interest” in the investigations into Epstein, the transcripts should be released.

It’s unclear if the courts will grant the administration’s request or whether the request will satisfy critics, including some of Trump’s own allies. Grand jury deliberations are typically kept secret. The judges could also take time to make a decision.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109359

File: 0fe9929bc54fe8e⋯.mp4 (12.67 MB,960x540,16:9,Clipboard.mp4)

File: 9de41404cec957f⋯.jpg (196.97 KB,1600x900,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 4433e3feae3c7c4⋯.jpg (197.23 KB,1600x900,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23348306 (191158ZJUL25) Notable: Video: Family of US pilot imprisoned in NSW pleads for his release after 1000 days – Former US Marine pilot and Australian citizen Daniel Duggan has spent 1000 days in Bathurst maximum security prison while awaiting extradition to the US on charges of illegally training Chinese pilots in South Africa between 2010 and 2012, which he denies. His wife Saffrine appealed to Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and Attorney-General Michelle Rowland: “Surely that can’t stand in a free, sovereign Australia… enough is enough.” Duggan’s legal team, which previously filed an 89-page submission, will challenge the extradition in the Federal Court next month.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Family of US pilot imprisoned in NSW pleads for his release after 1000 days

Emily Bennett - Jul 18, 2025

The family of imprisoned former US Marine Corps pilot and Australian citizen Daniel Duggan has made a fresh plea for his release 1000 days after he was locked up.

The 55-year-old is being held in a maximum security prison in Bathurst, NSW while awaiting extradition to the US.

Duggan was arrested in Australia in October 2022 on US orders, accused of breaching arms trafficking laws by providing military training to Chinese pilots in South Africa between 2010 and 2012.

He was allegedly paid $100,000 for his services.

Duggan has repeatedly denied the accusations.

His wife Saffrine Duggan has called on Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and the Attorney-General Michelle Rowland to release her husband.

"Today my husband and Aussie citizen Dan Duggan has now been locked up in maximum security for 1000 days, with no Australian charges, awaiting extradition to the United States," she said in a statement.

"Surely that can't stand in a free, sovereign Australia.

"Please Prime Minister and Attorney General, enough is enough. You need to help your fellow Aussies."

Saffrine also thanked the thousands of Australians who continue to have hope by showing their support.

Duggan's legal team sent a comprehensive 89-page submission to the former Attorney-General in August last year, however he approved Duggan's extradition in December.

The legal team intends to fight the extradition in the Federal Court, with a date set in August.

https://www.9news.com.au/national/family-of-imprisoned-pilot-daniel-duggan-makes-plea-for-his-release/f8580418-9276-41cc-be22-f47cbe14e848

https://qresear.ch/?q=Daniel+Duggan

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109360

File: f4359211fd54b6e⋯.mp4 (12 MB,540x676,135:169,Clipboard.mp4)

File: 331718fd7f28ffc⋯.jpg (147.08 KB,1024x683,1024:683,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 6f1bbab9bea2171⋯.jpg (112.83 KB,1200x675,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: b7236657da761e6⋯.jpg (148.98 KB,1200x675,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23348316 (191202ZJUL25) Notable: Video: Family plead for alleged China pilot trainer's freedom – Former US Marine and Australian citizen Daniel Duggan has spent 1000 days in maximum security, facing extradition to the US on charges he unlawfully trained Chinese pilots in South Africa between 2010–12. Duggan denies wrongdoing, saying intelligence agencies knew of his work. His wife Saffrine called the case “politically motivated” and pleaded with Anthony Albanese and Attorney-General Michelle Rowland: “Surely Dan, me and our six kids have been failed by our government.” Despite repeated appeals, the government says it will not intervene while the Federal Court review of his extradition proceeds.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109359

Family plead for alleged China pilot trainer's freedom

Alex Mitchell - July 18 2025

Australia won't intervene to stop the extradition of an ex-US marine locked up for 1000 days on allegations he unlawfully helped China.

Daniel Duggan faces up to 60 years in prison for allegedly training Chinese military personnel in South Africa after leaving the US Marine Corps.

The father of six is fighting his extradition to the United States in the Federal Court after former attorney-general Mark Dreyfus ticked it off in December.

Charges and an indictment were first filed in a sealed court case in 2017 under the first Donald Trump administration, before Duggan was arrested and detained in 2022.

His family, led by wife Saffrine Duggan, continues to plead with the government to intervene in his case.

She used the 1000-day milestone to beg Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and Attorney-General Michelle Rowland for his release before he is sent to America.

But the plea will fall on deaf ears, with Australia to keep Duggan in extradition custody until his judicial review process is complete.

"As the matter is currently before the court, it would not be appropriate to comment further," a spokesman for Ms Rowland said.

Ms Duggan called the charges "politically motivated" and said they do not stack up.

"Surely that can't stand in free Australia. Surely Dan, me and our six kids have been failed by our government," she said.

"We often hear our prime minister advocating for Australians locked up by a foreign government.

"Why won't our own government advocate for us?"

Ms Duggan has written to Ms Rowland asking her to examine the facts of the case "and learn what we already know".

"Dan and my family should not be in this situation.

"Australia should be a place of strength, of freedom, independence and justice," she said.

Duggan was arrested in Australia in October 2022 after being accused of breaching US arms-trafficking laws by providing military training to Chinese pilots in South Africa between 2010 and 2012.

He had worked part-time as a flying instructor during the relevant period.

In a letter from prison, Duggan said he believed his activities were not illegal and the Australian Security Intelligence Organisation and the US Naval Central Intelligence Service knew of his work.

He claimed ASIO agents brought up being able to meet Chinese generals and the topic of intelligence in a 2012 interview, leading him to believe they were trying to recruit him as a spy.

ASIO said it was unable to comment because the matter was before the court.

https://www.theleader.com.au/story/9019131/family-plead-for-alleged-china-pilot-trainers-freedom/

https://x.com/FreeDanDuggan/status/1946311514316755377

https://www.facebook.com/freedanduggan

https://www.change.org/p/support-dan-duggan-s-family-in-their-fight-to-overturn-extradition-decision

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109361

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23348545 (191331ZJUL25) Notable: Video: Counting begins as polls close in Tasmania for the election 'no one wanted – Tasmanians voted in their second election in 15 months after Liberal Premier Jeremy Rockliff called a snap poll following a no-confidence motion. Rockliff, in office since 2022, said he was “confident” he had put his “best foot forward,” while Labor leader Dean Winter urged voters to choose “a fresh start.” The campaign was dominated by debt concerns and a divisive plan for a Hobart AFL stadium, with Greens and independents opposing the project. Early signs suggest the crossbench may grow, threatening the Liberals’ hold on government.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>73639 (pb)

Counting begins as polls close in Tasmania for the election 'no one wanted'

Yashee Sharma - Jul 19, 2025

The polls have closed in Tasmania for the second election in just 15 months, as voters were forced to decide between a premier with no support behind him and an opposition hoping to offer a fresh start.

Electoral officials are beginning to count votes across the island state's five electorates.

Liberal Premier Jeremy Rockliff, who has held the position since 2022, made the case for more time in the top job, saying he is "confident" he put his best foot forward.

"I don't believe we could've done much more," he said.

Labor Opposition Leader Dean Winter is banking on the stunning Liberal wipeout across Tasmania in May's Federal Election.

"We've given Tasmanians a choice, and a choice for a fresh start," he said.

But the proposal to build an AFL stadium in Hobart for the state's incoming team in 2028 may throw a wrench in today's election.

Tasmania is already struggling with its budget and health system, meaning voters may prefer to vote for the Greens and independents who want the money for the stadium spent elsewhere.

Electoral officials are counting voters for the 35 seats across the state.

At last year's election, the Liberals won 14 seats, Labor won 10, the Greens won five, the Jacqui Lambie Network won three, and independents also won three.

All indications suggest the crossbench may grow.

What triggered the election?

The election was called last month after Winter tabled a no-confidence motion in parliament, arguing that rising debt, delayed ferries and a previous plan to privatise state assets made Rockliff's leadership untenable.

The Liberals' state budget in May revealed that debt was forecast to reach almost $11 billion by the end of the decade.

The motion was passed and, instead of resigning, Rockliff decided to take the state through their second election in 15 months.

"Another election is not what I wanted, and I know that it's not what Tasmanians wanted," he said in June.

"But it was forced upon us by the leader of the Opposition."

Governor Barbara Baker granted the dissolution of parliament to hold another election because she believed there was "no real possibility that an alternative government can be formed", but acknowledged the "public interest in avoiding the cost of another election and the prevailing public mood against holding an election".

Tasmania has been in political turmoil after having a total of four elections in seven years.

Rockliff called an early election last year in the hope of regaining majority rule in parliament after two of his MPs quit the Liberal Party and defected to the crossbench.

He suffered a 12 per cent swing at the polls, but won more seats than Labor, creating a hung parliament.

He later reached a deal with three MPs from the Jacqui Lambie Network to form government.

Then-Labor leader Rebecca White conceded defeat and resigned following her third straight loss at the polls, allowing Winter to successfully contest the role.

There are concerns the turbulence will derail Tasmania's incoming AFL team, which is due to join the league in 2028.

One thing is for sure - Rockliff and Winter have a lot to prove at this election.

The Liberals have held Tasmania since 2014, but the vote of no confidence means that Labor may have a fighting chance.

https://www.9news.com.au/national/tasmania-election-2025-date-candidates-everything-to-know-explained/1f569dfd-2fc2-4460-a766-2bf809e731eb

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FtGkqXrALdk

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109362

File: d98633ada67f2d3⋯.jpg (826.38 KB,3000x2000,3:2,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 2cebdf36f579ac8⋯.jpg (250.53 KB,871x919,871:919,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 66fb41aea24ecf9⋯.jpg (2.98 MB,7866x5247,874:583,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 003527fbadac80e⋯.jpg (3.9 MB,7576x5053,7576:5053,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23351189 (200033ZJUL25) Notable: Boost to Liberals, swing against Labor as voters punish ALP in Tasmanian poll – Tasmanian Premier Jeremy Rockliff claimed a “re-endorsement” as the Liberals secured 39 per cent of the primary vote, a 3.3 per cent boost, but still short of a majority. Labor suffered a 2.9 per cent swing against it, facing its worst result in state history at 25.8 per cent, with leader Dean Winter urging a “new approach to politics” in a likely hung parliament. The $945m Hobart AFL stadium dominated the campaign, splitting voters and boosting independents and Greens, who may now hold the balance of power.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109361

Boost to Liberals, swing against Labor as voters punish ALP in Tasmanian poll

Daniella White - July 19, 2025

1/2

Tasmanian Premier Jeremy Rockliff will seek to re-form government with an increased primary vote as Labor stares down the barrel of its worst result in the state’s history in an election dominated by a divisive debate over a new AFL stadium.

But a 3.3 per cent boost to the Liberal Party’s vote will likely not be enough for the party to lead a majority, and it remains possible for Labor to form a minority government.

With 39 per cent of the primary vote, the Liberal Party is set to fall short of forming a government in its own right and may be forced to negotiate with a largely left-leaning crossbench.

Rockliff said the result was a re-endorsement of the Liberal government and urged Tasmanian MPs to “respect the will of the people”, in a veiled reference to the dysfunctional Parliament which saw him lose a no-confidence vote brought on by Labor that led to the election.

Speaking in the election tally room in Hobart just after 9.30pm, after walking out to jubilant cheers of “Rocky, Rocky”, Rockliff said he would visit the state’s governor, Barbara Baker, and ask her to recommission his government “so we can get on with the job for Tasmania”.

“A little over six weeks ago, the leader of the Opposition forced this unnecessary election on the Tasmanian people by moving a vote of no confidence,” Rockliff said.

“Well tonight, the people of Tasmania in return have said that they have no confidence in the Labor Party to form government.”

With counting continuing late on Saturday night, Labor faced a 2.9 per cent swing against it, in a sign voters have punished the party for triggering an early poll by bringing the no-confidence motion which the Greens and some independents supported.

ABC election analyst Casey Briggs said it amounted to the party’s worst vote in Tasmanian history at just 25.8 per cent of the primary vote as of 10pm.

Speaking at the tally room on Saturday night, Labor leader Dean Winter did not concede but also would not reveal whether he will seek to work with the Greens.

But he said whoever forms government will have to form a “new approach to politics in the state” and show a willingness to work together.

Winter noted the parliament would likely return a majority of progressive MPs.

“Tonight, the Tasmanian people have spoken, and they have delivered another hung parliament and, with it, a resounding message that they want their politicians to work together more collaboratively. They aren’t happy with politics as usual, and they want to see things done differently,” he said.

Saturday’s snap poll, the second in under two years, was called after Rockliff lost a no-confidence-motion brought on by Labor, which criticised his budget management and the bungled roll-out of Spirit of Tasmania ferries. Rockliff chose to call an election instead of resigning.

Labor has ruled out doing a deal with The Greens to form government, but has left the door open to accepting supply and confidence from the minor party.

The party is predicted to hold either nine or 10 seats in the new parliament, with the Liberals remaining on at least 14. Eighteen seats are needed for a majority.

Speaking just after 10pm on Saturday night, Tasmanian Greens leader Rosalie Woodruff said Winter needed to have a conversation about the possibility of forming government with the Greens, despite his previous refusals to do so.

“There are differences, but the Greens and Labor have a lot in common too. We are ready. We are ready to work collaboratively in the best interest of Tasmanians and, Dean, I hope you put them first this time too,” she said.

The early election has delayed a key vote around the proposed $945 million Macquarie Point Stadium in Hobart and brought fierce anti- and pro-stadium sentiment to the forefront of the campaign.

The stadium project – an AFL condition of a new Tasmanian team, The Devils – is backed by Labor and Liberals but opposed by the Greens and most independents.

For many, like Hobart resident Travis Price, the proposed stadium and the prospect of a Tasmanian AFL team have ignited a newfound interest in politics.

“The team and the stadium have probably been the first major thing that’s got me to actually follow along with the politicians and what’s important for the state,” Price said on Saturday at an election-day rally in support of the stadium.

He said he voted Liberal, seeing the party as the strongest advocates for the stadium’s completion.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109363

File: 9b73482fa65007a⋯.jpg (204.58 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: ba80cf0ded87fe5⋯.jpg (370.26 KB,2000x2667,2000:2667,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 8bdb80ea6205799⋯.jpg (384.67 KB,2000x2666,1000:1333,Clipboard.jpg)

File: a5d9407cf2ca2e0⋯.jpg (203.06 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23351612 (200218ZJUL25) Notable: Tasmanian state election leaves state in limbo as Rockliff, Labor fight to form government – Tasmania faces another hung parliament, with Liberal Premier Jeremy Rockliff claiming a mandate to govern after winning the most seats, while Labor leader Dean Winter pointed to a “progressive majority” and called for collaboration with the Greens and crossbench. Rockliff vowed to work “maturely and pragmatically” with independents despite strained ties, but securing 18 seats for confidence and supply remains uncertain. Winter ruled out another election, urging a “new approach” to politics. Greens leader Rosalie Woodruff invited Labor into a power-sharing alliance, signalling weeks of negotiations ahead.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109361

>>109362

Tasmanian state election leaves state in Limbo as Rockliff, Labor fight to form government

MATTHEW DENHOLM - 20 July 2025

Tasmania is in political limbo, with both major party leaders flagging they can form government after the election of another hung parliament.

Labor leader Dean Winter said Saturday’s snap election had essentially returned the same result as the 2024 poll and voters wanted a different approach.

With Greens leader Rosalie Woodruff earlier offering to “have a conversation” with Mr Winter about forming government with Labor and crossbenchers, it appears such an outcome is possible in the weeks ahead.

Mr Winter said the majority in the new parliament would be “progressive”. “It is incumbent upon all of us to respect the will of the people and to make this new parliament work in the best interests of Tasmania,” he said.

“Whoever forms the next government will need to develop a new approach to politics in this state, one where genuine collaboration and a willingness to work together, and an ability to put aside differences.”

With Labor suffering its worse result this century, he said voters wanted a “change of approach”. “The Liberals will have the most seats but it is uncertain as to how they will achieve a majority,” he said.

He would not “trade away” Labor policies or values, but suggested he was prepared to “collaborate” with the crossbench.

“If the Liberals are unable to form a government, another election is not an option,” he said. “Fundamentally, what Tasmanians have asked us to do is to collaborate on the big challenges that face our state.”

Earlier, Liberal Premier Jeremy Rockliff said he was “humbled” that his party had won the most seats and, while falling short of a majority, he would ask Governor Barbara Baker to recommission him.

To chants of “Rocky”, the Liberal leader – deposed in a no-confidence motion only weeks ago – told the Hobart tally room he would work in a “mature and pragmatic” way with balance of power crossbenchers.

He said Labor, which suffered a negative 3.4 per cent swing on the latest count, had been rejected by voters.

“A little over six weeks ago the leader of the opposition forced this unnecessary election on the Tasmanian people by moving a vote of no confidence,” Mr Rockliff said.

“Well, tonight, the people of Tasmania in return have said they have no confidence in the Labor Party to form government. And they have voted to re-endorse our Liberal government.”

With more than half the vote counted, it appeared the ruling Liberals would win 14-15 seats, Labor 10, the Greens 5, independents 4 and the Shooters, Fishers, Farmers 1-2.

Mr Rockliff faces a largely hostile crossbench and will struggle to secure sufficient pledges of confidence and supply to govern with surety.

It appears the SFF will secure one and possibly two seats, soaking up the vote displaced by the demise of the Jacqui Lambie Network, while the National Party appears to have failed in its bid to gain a toe hold in the state.

The independents expected to be elected include anti-salmon newcomer Peter George, in the southern seat of Franklin, and sitting MPs Kristie Johnston in Clark, Craig Garland in Braddon, and David O’Byrne, in Franklin.

To secure the 18 votes in the 35 seat Assembly to govern with confidence and supply, Mr Rockliff – who has a troubled relationship with the existing crossbench – will need to win over three or four MPs.

While Mr O’Byrne has previously provided confidence and supply to the Liberals, Ms Johnston, Mr Garland and Mr George are not thought likely to offer such deals.

Even with the one or two SFF MPs onside, that would leave the Liberals short of a guaranteed majority on confidence and supply, as well as the passage of legislation.

That would leave the government at the constant whim of the crossbench and having to horse-trade for each piece of legislation, potentially include budgets.

Greens leader Rosalie Woodruff, whose party has retained its five seats, urged Labor leader Dean Winter to “have the conversation” about forming a power-sharing alliance.

“Yes there are differences but the Greens and Labor have a lot in common, too,” Dr Woodruff said. “We are ready to work collaboratively in the interests of Tasmanians. Dean, I hope you put them first this time, too.”

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/jeremy-rockliff-claims-victory-in-tasmanian-election-expects-to-form-minority-liberal-government/news-story/12b60087324e5954af90c70f4af7f171

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109364

File: dee56f4fd1db2c2⋯.jpg (786.23 KB,2092x2929,2092:2929,Clipboard.jpg)

File: cb3b11005167004⋯.jpg (262.59 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 8f6710843e9009f⋯.jpg (253.03 KB,2048x1365,2048:1365,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23351668 (200238ZJUL25) Notable: Carrier USS George Washington Joins Talisman Sabre Drills off Australia – The USS George Washington Carrier Strike Group has joined Talisman Sabre 2025, the largest-ever iteration of the multilateral exercise involving 19 nations and 35,000 troops. Rear Admiral Eric Anduze said the drills rehearse “ally and partner integration” to increase interoperability and deterrence. Allied vessels include the UK’s HMS Prince of Wales, Australia’s HMAS Sydney, Canada’s HMCS Ville de Quebec, and Norway’s HNoMS Roald Amundsen. For the first time, F-35C fighters are participating. Brigadier Damian Hill said Australia’s vast geography tests partners’ ability to project force across the Indo-Pacific’s vast distances.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109224

>>109320

>>109315

Carrier USS George Washington Joins Talisman Sabre Drills off Australia

GORDON ARTHUR - JULY 16, 2025

1/2

TOWNSVILLE, AUSTRALIA — The U.S. Navy’s George Washington Carrier Strike Group is joining in exercise Talisman Sabre, contributing thousands of sailors to the largest iteration of the multilateral exercise off the coast of Australia in the CSG’s first major international exercise since returning to Japan.

The U.S. is one of 19 nations and 35,000 troops engaging in Talisman Sabre 2025, which has been held every two years since 2005. This year’s event kicked off July 13 and will conclude July 27. The strike group includes the USS George Washington (CVN-73), the Arleigh Burke-class USS Shoup (DDG-86), the Ticonderoga-class cruiser USS Robert Smalls (CG-62), and Carrier Air Wing Five, according to Rear Admiral Eric Anduze, commander of Carrier Strike Group Five and Task Force 70, who spoke to USNI News from his flagship shortly after the exercise began.

“We participate in Talisman Sabre ‘25 in order to rehearse, join and combine operations with our Australian counterparts, demonstrate maneuverability of naval forces in a contested environment, and increase operability and lethality,” Anduze said.

The carrier strike group joins the exercise following scheduled maintenance and reintegration into the forward deployed naval forces.

The strike group’s role in the exercise is “no different” than its typical role, according to Anduze.

“We are a striking element of the U.S. Navy. We do ally and partner integration, we do deterrence, and we do that with the arm of Carrier Air Wing Five and our ships of escort,” Anduze said.

For reasons of operational and exercise security, Anduze declined to reveal the area where Carrier Strike Group Five is training during the exercise. However, USNI News understands the CSG was likely sailing in the Timor Sea north of Darwin at the time of the interview. The George Washington Carrier Strike Group is working with other navies, including Anduze’s British equivalent under the Talisman Sabre 2025 construct, he said. Despite the presence of allies, Anduze only commands U.S. Navy ships.

“There are, other than U.S. and Australian forces, other navies out here and we work on interoperability with tactics, communications, command and control. So we work on all those aspects of our combined force as we maneuver our forces to conduct warfare.”

These allies include the United Kingdom Carrier Strike Group headed by HMS Prince of Wales (R09) and its escorts, comprising the British destroyer HMS Dauntless (D33), frigate HMS Richmond (F239) and fleet oiler RFA Tidespring (A136), as well as the Australian destroyer HMAS Sydney (DDG42), the Canadian frigate HMCS Ville De Quebec (FFH332) and the Norwegian frigate HNoMS Roald Amundsen (F311).

The goal of the exercise, he rear admiral explained, is to rehearse interoperability across the allied navies.

“We rehearse our tactics and communications, how we operate and how Australia operates, how we communicate and how we integrate across multiple domains. All of these experiences increase interoperability and strengthen our alliance as a whole for the security and freedom of the Indo-Pacific,” Anduze said.

The U.S. conducts routine operations in the region to ensure freedom of navigation and a free and open Indo-Pacific.

“And we have to do it with allies and partners in order to be successful and have the most impact. So anytime we have the ability to share, coordinate and work together, it is a chance for our tactics to become more refined and for us to be able to come together quickly,” Anduze said.

Having sailed from the Philippines, departing Manila on July 7, it is presumed that Carrier Strike Group Five passed through the South China Sea, the majority of which China vehemently claims as its own. China’s navy routinely shadows or harasses foreign naval vessels, law enforcement craft and fishermen in the South China Sea, with the Philippines being meted out for harsh treatment.

Incidentally, July 12 marked the ninth anniversary of the Permanent Court of Arbitration’s findings that China’s “historic rights” and nine-dashed claims had no legal basis.

“It also found China had violated the Philippines’ sovereign rights under UNCLOS and that its vessels had unlawfully created risks of collision and danger. Unfortunately, nine years later, we continue to see instability and destabilizing conduct in the South China Sea,” the Australian government explained on the anniversary.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109365

File: 0eb2483dd6066e1⋯.jpg (1.9 MB,2048x1366,1024:683,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 88e46866d1629c9⋯.jpg (1.7 MB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 03ab6ee4cc2cfc3⋯.jpg (1.45 MB,2048x1366,1024:683,Clipboard.jpg)

File: b86fda7b22b0d24⋯.jpg (1.46 MB,2048x1366,1024:683,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23351734 (200307ZJUL25) Notable: Aircraft Carriers USS George Washington, HMS Prince of Wales Team Up off Australia – USS George Washington and HMS Prince of Wales met in the Timor Sea for the first dual-carrier operations in Talisman Sabre history. The Royal Navy hailed the “powerful demonstration of naval power,” with Prince of Wales embarking 17 F-35Bs and George Washington deploying F-35Cs, marking the first F-35C participation in the exercise. Supporting vessels include USS Robert Smalls, USS Shoup, HMAS Sydney, HMS Dauntless, HMCS Ville de Québec, HNoMS Roald Amundsen, and RFA Tidespring. The UK group continues its Operation Highmast deployment, sailing to Japan after drills conclude July 27.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109224

>>109320

>>109315

Aircraft Carriers USS George Washington, HMS Prince of Wales Team Up off Australia

DZIRHAN MAHADZIR - JULY 18, 2025

Aircraft carriers USS George Washington (CVN-73) and HMS Prince of Wales met Friday in the Timor Sea for operations as part of Talisman Sabre 2025.

“This powerful demonstration of naval power brings together advanced capabilities and carrier aviation, including HMS Prince of Wales’ air group of F-35B Lightning jets,” the Royal Navy said..

Friday’s operations mark the first time aircraft carriers from the U.S. and the U.K. have operated together as part of Talisman Sabre since the exercise began in 2005. Held every other year off the coast of Australia, the eleventh iteration of the multinational exercise began July 13 and will conclude July 27. The U.S. and the U.K. are among 19 countries and 35,000 troops participating in the exercise.

The dual carrier operations are also the George Washington CSG’s first major bilateral drill since returning to Japan. Meanwhile, the UKCSG’s participation in Talisman Sabre is part of its Operation Highmast deployment to the Mediterranean and Indo-Pacific.

The George Washington CSG consists of aircraft carrier George Washington with embarked Carrier Air Wing (CVW-5), cruiser USS Robert Smalls (CG-62), and destroyer USS Shoup (DDG-86). The UKCSG includes aircraft carrier HMS Prince of Wales (R09), destroyer HMS Dauntless (D33), Royal Australian Navy (RAN) destroyer HMAS Sydney (DDG-42), Royal Norwegian Navy frigate HNoMS Roald Amundsen (F311), Royal Canadian (RCN) frigate HMCS Ville de Québec (FFH 332) and fleet oiler RFA Tidespring (A136). Royal New Zealand Navy (RNZN) frigate HMNZS Te Kaha (F77), which was part of the UKCGS, has detached from the group but will remain off the coast of Australia to participate in Talisman Sabre as part of the New Zealand contingent for the drills.

Both CSGs are operating F-35 Lightning II fighters. George Washington’s embarked Strike Fighter Squadron (VFA) 147 “Argonauts” of CVW-5 operates F-35Cs. This is the first time the F-35C variant is participating in Talisman Sabre.

Prince of Wales is embarked with 17 F-35Bs from an original complement of 18 with one aircraft grounded in India at Thiruvananthapuram airport following a diversionary landing on June 14 due to bad weather.

The Royal Australian Air Force (RAAF) land-based F-35As and U.S. Marine Corps F-35Bs of Marine Fighter Attack Squadron (VMFA) 242 “Bats” embarked on amphibious assault ship USS America (LHA-6) are also taking part in Talisman Sabre drills. Two VMFA-242 F-35Bs conducted landings, refueling and take-offs on July 8 on Prince of Wales in the run-up to the multilateral exercise.

The Royal Norwegian Air Force originally planned to send seven F-35As to Australia for Talisman Sabre but called it off due to a lack of available partner nation tankers to support the aircraft’s flight to Australia.

George Washington CGS is participating in the massive exercise following scheduled maintenance and reintegration into the forward deployed naval forces.

The UKCSG is expected to sail to Japan after Talisman Sabre, conducting drills with U.S. and Japanese forces along the way.

https://news.usni.org/2025/07/18/aircraft-carriers-uss-george-washington-hms-prince-of-wales-team-up-off-australia

https://x.com/RoyalNavy/status/1946194479393701931

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109366

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23351780 (200323ZJUL25) Notable: Video: Talisman Sabre 2025: The top end operation with 150 planes - South East Queensland is taking centre stage in this year's Exercise Talisman Sabre. - 9 News Australia

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109224

>>109320

>>109315

Talisman Sabre 2025: The top end operation with 150 planes

9 News Australia

Jul 17, 2025

South East Queensland is taking centre stage in this year's Exercise Talisman Sabre.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jtqDCxRt4Jg

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109367

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23351790 (200329ZJUL25) Notable: Video: Talisman Sabre 2025: Australia's armed forces test readiness in major military exercise - Australia's armed forces are participating in a major military exercise called Talisman Sabre, involving over 150 aircraft from 19 countries. The exercise is designed to test the readiness and capabilities of the Australian defence forces in the face of an increasingly assertive China. - 7NEWS Australia

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109224

>>109320

>>109315

Talisman Sabre 2025: Australia's armed forces test readiness in major military exercise

7NEWS Australia

Jul 17, 2025

Australia's armed forces are participating in a major military exercise called Talisman Sabre, involving over 150 aircraft from 19 countries. The exercise is designed to test the readiness and capabilities of the Australian defence forces in the face of an increasingly assertive China.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6IadKXmbVjk

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109368

File: f5f473f9810c329⋯.jpg (353.27 KB,2980x2081,2980:2081,Clipboard.jpg)

File: a623f32a9a105c4⋯.jpg (329.57 KB,2000x1333,2000:1333,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23352196 (200746ZJUL25) Notable: Australian Army helicopter damaged in 'hard landing' during Talisman Sabre exercise in the NT – An Australian Army Tiger helicopter was damaged after a “hard landing” near Timber Creek during Talisman Sabre, though the two crew escaped unharmed. The 1st Aviation Regiment has paused flying operations pending an independent Defence Flight Safety Bureau investigation, but other rotary support will continue. Defence thanked NT Emergency Services and the US for their assistance. The biennial war games involve 30,000 personnel from 19 nations. The incident comes two years after a fatal Taipan crash at the same exercise, which led to the helicopter fleet being permanently grounded.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109224

>>109320

>>109315

Australian Army helicopter damaged in 'hard landing' during Talisman Sabre exercise in the NT

abc.net.au - 18 Jul 2025

An Australian Army helicopter has been damaged during a multinational defence exercise in the Northern Territory, while all crew members on board avoided injury.

A defence spokesperson said the Tiger helicopter experienced a "hard landing" on Wednesday evening while participating in Exercise Talisman Sabre near Timber Creek, about 300 kilometres south-west of Katherine.

"The two aircrew aboard were unharmed and able to exit the helicopter safely," they said.

The spokesperson said the 1st Aviation Regiment had "implemented a pause on unit flying operations" after the incident but "other rotary wing support to the exercise will continue".

They said the Defence Flight Safety Bureau had deployed a team to the Northern Territory to start an "independent aviation investigation of the incident".

"Defence thanks Northern Territory Emergency Services and the United States for their support during the response to the incident."

Exercise Talisman Sabre involves 30,000 military personnel from 19 nations and is the largest combined training activity between the Australian Defence Force (ADF) and United States military.

The biennial war games involve live firing and combat simulations across land, sea and air.

The ADF permanently grounded its fleet of Taipan helicopters after a fatal crash during the exercise two years ago which killed Captain Danniel Lyon, Lieutenant Maxwell Nugent, Warrant Officer Class 2 Joseph "Phillip" Laycock and Corporal Alexander Naggs.

A defence investigation into the crash later found evasive action taken by the pilot avoided more lives being lost.

An ADF spokesperson told the ABC earlier this month both Black Hawk and Chinook helicopters would be used by the army during this year's exercise.

Australian personnel were also expected to fly in three Taipans operated by New Zealand's Defence Force as part of the exercise when it formally commenced last weekend.

"The Australian Army will deploy rotary-wing capabilities from the Battlefield Aviation Program, including the CH-47F Chinook and UH-60M Black Hawks to support movement of troops and equipment across the battlefield," they said.

"Partner nations, including New Zealand, Singapore and the United States, will also deploy rotary-wing lift assets."

The ABC also confirmed the 1st Regiment's Tiger helicopters would provide armed reconnaissance support during the large-scale war drills.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-07-18/talisman-sabre-tiger-helicopter-incident-australian-army/105547892

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109369

File: 336778deacb8e94⋯.jpg (100.66 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23352204 (200755ZJUL25) Notable: Tiger Helicopter goes down during 2025 Talisman Sabre operations – An Australian Army Tiger Armed Reconnaissance Helicopter sustained damage after a “hard landing” at Bradshaw Training Area, Timber Creek, on July 16, just hours before it was due to finish its role in Talisman Sabre. Defence confirmed the two crew were unharmed, though the incident was kept under wraps for almost 48 hours. An independent Defence Flight Safety Bureau investigation is underway, with the entire 1st Aviation Regiment grounded pending findings. The ADF plans to retire the troubled Tiger fleet later this year, replacing it with AH-64E Apache helicopters.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109224

>>109320

>>109368

Tiger Helicopter goes down during 2025 Exercise Talisman Sabre operations

It has been revealed that the Army Tiger helicopter which went down in the NT outback was just hours away from wrapping up its contribution to Exercise Talisman Sabre. Meanwhile, defence are remaining tight-lipped around the situation.

Nathaniel Chambers and Harry Brill - July 20, 2025

The military helicopter which hard-landed in the NT outback was just hours away from finishing the exercise, defence say, with authorities remaining tight-lipped around incident.

On Saturday afternoon, the ADF confirmed a Tiger Armed Reconnaissance Helicopter (ARH) sustained damaged after it experienced a hard-landing at Bradshaw Training Area, near Timber Creek, on the evening of July 16.

No major injuries or casualties were sustained.

In response, an Aviation Safety Investigation Team deployed to the NT to examine the circumstances around the incident.

Meanwhile, the incident was kept under close wraps by defence media, who held off from announcing the incident for almost 48 hours.

As officials enter day three of their investigation, defence have now confirmed ARH support to Exercise Talisman Sabre was supposed to have concluded on the same day of the incident.

For 1st Aviation Regiment - the unit involved in the incident - the investigation has created inconvenience, with the entire unit barred from flying operations while the investigation unfolds.

Asked when the unit would be permitted to take to the skies again, defence declined to comment.

‘Independent investigation’ launched after Talisman Sabre chopper goes down

An Army Tiger helicopter has gone down during a training exercise in the Northern Territory as part of Exercise Talisman Sabre.

An Australian Defence Force spokesperson told this masthead a Tiger Armed Reconnaissance Helicopter (ARH) experienced a “hard landing” in the vicinity of the Bradshaw Training Area, at Timber Creek, on July 16.

There were no major injuries or casualties as a result of the incident, according to the spokesperson.

The two crew on-board were unharmed and were able to safely exit the aircraft.

The helicopter sustained damage during the hard landing.

The Director of the Defence Flight Safety Bureau has established an independent aviation safety investigation team to probe the incident.

“To enable to conduct of this investigation the 1st Aviation Regiment has implemented a pause on unit flying operations,” the statement read.

“Other rotary wing support to the exercise will continue.”

The Defence spokesperson thanked the Northern Territory Emergency Services and the United States for their support during the response to the incident.

“Defence is committed to ensuring the safety of military personnel during all exercise and training activities, including Exercise Talisman Sabre 2025,” they said.

The ADF has plans to retire the Tiger, which was brought into service in 2004.

Made in Europe, army aviators have raised concerns around the chopper’s performance, with technical deficiencies and maintenance issues a common criticism of the airframe.

Under army project LAND 4503, the Tiger is expected to be replaced in late 2025 by the world-renowned AH-64E Apache attack helicopter.

Exercise Talisman Sabre is a multinational operation that has been conducted between Australia and the United States biennially since 2005.

The 2025 iteration of the event started on July 13.

https://www.ntnews.com.au/news/tiger-helicopter-crashes-during-2025-exercise-talisman-sabre-operations/news-story/77a45eb47fc567b68ec8c16ea8688b7e

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109370

File: 7f1d78832c07030⋯.mp4 (12.91 MB,640x360,16:9,Clipboard.mp4)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23352220 (200813ZJUL25) Notable: Video: Talisman Sabre Exercise Includes New Space Domain - The Talisman Sabre Exercise is a lot bigger this year and for the first time there's a space operations team. That new space domain will also be opening up for new recruits. - 7NEWS Townsville

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109224

>>109320

>>109315

Talisman Sabre Exercise Includes New Space Domain

7NEWS Townsville - 15 July 2025

The Talisman Sabre Exercise is a lot bigger this year and for the first time there's a space operations team.

That new space domain will also be opening up for new recruits.

https://www.facebook.com/7NEWSTownsville/videos/talisman-sabre-exercise-includes-new-space-domain/714029624939425/

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109371

File: cd965717a2c50c7⋯.png (6.36 MB,2048x1536,4:3,Clipboard.png)

File: 54490abe88daa81⋯.png (2.72 MB,1137x1513,1137:1513,Clipboard.png)

File: d83663f1161ca7d⋯.png (3.33 MB,1146x1478,573:739,Clipboard.png)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23352234 (200828ZJUL25) Notable: ABF report disturbing rise in alleged importation of child-like sex dolls into Australia — Australian Border Force (ABF) reports a “disturbing rise” in attempts to import banned child-like sex dolls, with 47 seized nationwide in the past year and six arrests made in seven NSW raids since November. Offenders face fines up to $782,500 and 10 years’ jail. Recent Hunter Valley arrests include Trevor Richard Jones, 63, who pleaded guilty, and Paul Adams, 49, who also faces child abuse and bestiality charges. ABF Inspector Michael Mahony said, “Dolls that normalise child exploitation are far from a victimless crime and they have no place in the Australian community.”

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

ABF report disturbing rise in alleged importation of child-like sex dolls into Australia

Dan Proudman - July 18, 2025

Authorities are seizing child-like sex dolls at the country’s border on an almost weekly basis in what is being described as a “disturbing rise” in importations of the banned sick playthings which can attract maximum fines of almost $800,000 and 10-year jail terms.

Australian Border Force officials have made six arrests during seven raids in NSW alone since November, including the charging of three Hunter men over their unrelated alleged attempts to bring the child-like sex dolls into their homes.

It follows 47 dolls being seized by ABF officials across Australia in air, sea and mail cargo during the financial year ending last month and has prompted a warning for others getting on websites to order the products to know of the consequences.

The offence of importing tier two goods, namely child-like sex dolls, in contravention of the Customs Act (1901) attracts maximum penalties of a $782,500 fine and a decade behind bars, or both.

Lake Macquarie man Trevor Richard Jones, 63, pleaded guilty in Newcastle Local Court on Wednesday to the Commonwealth charge of intentionally importing prohibited tier 2 goods without approval before his matter was adjourned to Toronto in August.

Jones was arrested during a raid of a Cooranbong property on November 11 last year, after ABF officers found a child-like sex doll in an air cargo consignment in October.

He was the first of three significant arrests across the Hunter, with ABF officers raids a property north of Scone on May 14 after allegedly finding a doll within an air cargo consignment declared as a “silicone doll” the previous month.

Paul Adams, 49, was charged with the importation count as well as a series of other charges including four counts of possessing child abuse data using a carriage service, and one count of possessing bestiality material.

Adams has not been required to enter any pleas and remains in custody on remand after not applying for bail.

And last month, 52-year-old Anthony Blakewell was arrested at a Whitebridge address following a raid on a northern NSW premises before being charged with importing a child-like sex doll.

Blakewell has also not been required to enter a plea and was granted conditional bail to reappear in court on August 6.

“The Australian Border Force (ABF) is cracking down on a disturbing rise in attempted importations of child-like sex dolls into New South Wales (NSW), with more than half a dozen warrants actioned since late 2024,” the ABF said in a statement.

ABF Insp Michael Mahony said backing the intelligence and officers that protect the most vulnerable members of our community would always be a top priority for the ABF.

“These are just a few examples of recent actions taken by the ABF in relation to child-like sex dolls. Dolls that normalise child exploitation are far from a victimless crime and they have no place in the Australian community,” Insp Mahony said.

“Our officers utilise intelligence-led screening and risk-based targeting to disrupt illicit goods like these child-like sex dolls from being imported into our country.”

“The ABF is resolute in its commitment to seize any and all forms of abhorrent child abuse material at the border and ensure those responsible are prosecuted.”

https://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/newslocal/the-newcastle-news/abf-report-disturbing-rise-in-alleged-importation-of-childlike-sex-dolls-into-australia/news-story/ecccd723c851e93117d87d3214b23fb1

https://www.abf.gov.au/newsroom-subsite/Pages/Crackdown-on-child-like-sex-doll-imports-across-NSW-results-in-multiple-arrests.aspx

https://qresear.ch/?q=child-like+sex+doll

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109372

File: 8c683b0a1ce4d1a⋯.jpg (1.32 MB,5000x3335,1000:667,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 824bac3af928f99⋯.jpg (399.26 KB,1098x968,549:484,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23352250 (200838ZJUL25) Notable: Ex-Australian PM Morrison to testify before US House panel on China — Former Australian Prime Minister Scott Morrison will appear before the U.S. House Select Committee on China on Wednesday at a hearing on countering Beijing’s “economic coercion against democracies.” Former U.S. ambassador to Japan Rahm Emanuel will also testify. Relations with China soured under Morrison after Australia banned Huawei from its 5G network and demanded a COVID-19 origins probe, prompting tariffs on wine, barley, beef and coal. Emanuel has described China’s “economic coercion” as its “most persistent and pernicious tool.” The hearing comes as current PM Anthony Albanese moves to stabilise ties with Beijing.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109335

>>109337

>>109352

Ex-Australian PM Morrison to testify before US House panel on China

David Shepardson - July 19, 2025

WASHINGTON, July 18 (Reuters) - Former Australian Prime Minister Scott Morrison will testify at a U.S. House panel hearing on Wednesday about countering China's "economic coercion against democracies," the committee said on Friday.

Former U.S. ambassador to Japan Rahm Emanuel will also testify before the House Select Committee on China.

Relations with China, already rocky after Australia banned Huawei from its 5G broadband network in 2018, cooled further after Canberra called for an independent investigation into the origins of COVID-19.

China responded by imposing tariffs on Australian commodities, including wine and barley and limited imports of Australian beef, coal and grapes, moves described by the United States as "economic coercion."

Morrison was defeated in a bid for reelection in 2022.

Reuters reported this week Canberra is close to an agreement with Beijing that would allow Australian suppliers to ship five trial canola cargoes to China, sources familiar with the matter said, a move towards ending a years-long freeze in the trade. China imposed 100% tariffs on Canadian canola meal and oil this year amid strained diplomatic ties.

Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese visited China this week, underscoring a warming of ties.

Emanuel, who told a Chicago news outlet last month he is considering a run for president in 2028, has been a harsh critic of China, saying last year Beijing constantly uses coercion and pressures other countries, including Japan and the Philippines.

"Economic coercion by China is their most persistent and pernicious tool in their toolbox," Emanuel said in a separate speech in 2023.

The Chinese Embassy in Washington did not immediately comment.

https://www.reuters.com/world/china/ex-australian-pm-morrison-testify-before-us-house-panel-china-2025-07-18/

https://www.congress.gov/event/119th-congress/house-event/118535

https://selectcommitteeontheccp.house.gov/

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109373

File: ee2b4147cd83691⋯.jpg (2.55 MB,5760x3840,3:2,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23352261 (200846ZJUL25) Notable: Rudd ‘confident’ on AUKUS review, rejects defence spending claims — Kevin Rudd, Australia’s ambassador to Washington, said he was “confident” issues raised by the Pentagon’s AUKUS review under Elbridge Colby would be resolved, citing his long relationship with Colby and the “mature relationship” between defence establishments. Rudd rejected claims Australia underspends on defence, arguing differences in methodology mean its real level is closer to 2.5 per cent of GDP. He stressed AUKUS was a “quarter of a trillion dollar exercise” benefiting both nations. Despite past criticisms of Donald Trump, Rudd said the alliance had proved resilient and would grow stronger under his presidency.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109299

>>109316

>>109318

Rudd ‘confident’ on AUKUS review, rejects defence spending claims

Jessica Gardner - Jul 19, 2025

Washington | Kevin Rudd believes issues raised by the Pentagon’s review of the AUKUS submarine pact can be resolved, but refutes suggestions that Australia is not spending enough on defence.

The former prime minister and now United States ambassador, who is under intense scrutiny amid strains in the Australia-US alliance, said the relationship had proved resilient through 15 prime ministers and presidents and would grow stronger under President Donald Trump.

“For the better part of 100 years, every major war in the 20th century and into the 21st century, we’re the crazy guys in the foxholes next to you,” he said during a panel discussion at the Aspen Security Forum on Friday (Saturday AEST). “So I think history does speak for something.”

The decades-long alliance has been tested in Trump’s second term because of tariffs on Australian goods, demands for Canberra to lift defence spending and a probe that jeopardises a $368 billion plan for Australia to acquire nuclear-powered submarines.

The Pentagon review of AUKUS is being run by under secretary of defence for policy Elbridge Colby, a known sceptic of the arrangement. The review seeks to ensure the sale of US submarines to Australia as part of AUKUS does not diminish US military capacity.

Colby has reportedly put pressure on Australia as part of the review to say what role it would take in a war between the United States and China over Taiwan, while observers expect he will conclude that Canberra must lift its own defence spending as a prerequisite for AUKUS to continue.

‘I’m confident’

Rudd, a foreign policy specialist who was prime minister between 2007 and 2010 and in 2013, said he had a good relationship with Colby, who many refer to as ‘Bridge’.

“Bridge has been around my place a lot of times, and so we have known each other for a long period of time, and that’s why I’m confident, quite apart from the mature relationship within our two defence establishments ... that we’ll work our way through this stuff,” he said.

“We are confident that we’ll work our way through each and every one of the issues which he has raised in the context of this internal Defence Department review.”

The Trump administration has successfully persuaded European nations to lift their defence spending to 3.5 per cent of gross domestic product annually, but the Albanese government has so far rebuffed similar demands from US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth.

Australia spends about 2 per cent of GDP on defence, but Rudd said it had been spending at this level or above for a lot longer than other nations. As well, he added, Australia used a narrower definition of defence spending than the US, without going into detail.

“There’s this whole question, frankly, of methodology, of how you count defence expenditures and outlays,” he said. “And there’s an active debate about how, in fact, that would render Australia’s current defence numbers probably more in the vicinity of 2.5 [per cent] or north if the same methodology was deployed as is deployed in the United States.”

The United States spends about 3.4 per cent, which includes a portion of the spending on its National Intelligence Programme, according to the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute.

Fierce China hawk

Further, Rudd said Australia had committed to significant long-term defence investments, especially through AUKUS, which brought other benefits to the US, such as maintenance facilities in Perth for American submarines.

“The AUKUS program… itself is a quarter of a trillion dollar exercise over the next 15 years,” he said. “We will continue to increase our allocations on defence, and the PM [Anthony Albanese] has been very clear about doing so consistent with our national interests.”

Another former prime minister, Malcolm Turnbull, said this week that he has had past conversations with Colby, raising his well-known criticisms of the AUKUS deal.

Colby is a fierce China hawk who has said that US military efforts should prioritise holding back Beijing’s ambitions to expand its authoritarian influence in the region, including a possible invasion of Taiwan.

But some foreign policy experts have raised concerns about Trump’s willingness to push back on China, amid elements in the Republican Party who want the US to scale back its participation in foreign conflicts.

Rudd, who has been critical of Trump in the past, said the administration’s support for the Quad alliance between the US, Australia, Japan and India showed it retained the clear view that Chinese power “has to be rolled back in multiple domains”.

https://www.afr.com/policy/foreign-affairs/rudd-confident-on-aukus-review-rejects-defence-spending-claims-20250719-p5mg4g

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109374

File: a432f7e0cd4f39d⋯.mp4 (15.92 MB,960x540,16:9,Clipboard.mp4)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23352309 (200910ZJUL25) Notable: Video: First tranche of Australian army tanks arrive in Ukraine — More than half of the 49 M1A1 Abrams tanks pledged by Australia are now with Ukraine’s armed forces, nine months after the Albanese government’s commitment. Defence Minister Richard Marles said the tanks would make a “significant contribution” to Ukraine’s fight against Russia, while Pat Conroy said they provided “more firepower and more mobility.” The $245m tanks, originally slated for retirement, faced US export delays before delivery. Their upkeep may cost $153m annually.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>73521 (pb)

First tranche of Australian army tanks arrive in Ukraine

JACK QUAIL - July 18, 2025

More than half of the 49 Australian Army tanks pledged to Ukraine are now in the hands of its armed forces – nine months after the Albanese government first made the commitment.

Under the promise, announced in October 2024, Australia agreed to provide Ukraine with dozens of recently retired M1A1 Abrams tanks in response to a formal request from Kyiv, in a move aimed at bolstering the country’s fighting efforts against Russia’s ongoing invasion.

The Australian tanks – valued at $245m – were originally scheduled to be retired this year and replaced by next-generation M1A2 models.

Yet they are still in good condition and are widely regarded as more advanced than many of the tanks currently operated by Russia’s military.

The transfer marks the first tranche of armoured equipment delivered under the agreement, and follows a prolonged delivery process that was delayed by bureaucratic hurdles in the US.

Until recently, the tanks had remained in Australia due to extended delays by the US in approving their export.

In April, The Australian revealed that the vehicles were still on Australian soil, with the US State Department only seeking congressional sign-off for the transfer about three weeks prior.

In a statement announcing the transfer, Defence Minister Richard Marles said the federal government remained “steadfast” in its support for Ukraine.

Mr Marles said he had met with Australian Defence Force personnel who had helped deliver the first tranche of tanks.

“The M1A1 Abrams tanks will make a significant contribution to Ukraine’s ongoing fight against Russia’s illegal and immoral invasion,” he said.

That view was shared by Defence Industry Minister Pat Conroy, who said the promised military hardware would provide Ukraine’s armed forces with “more firepower and more mobility”.

“They meet a direct request from the Ukrainian government and form part of Australia’s unwavering commitment to protect the global rules-based order,” he said.

Once completed, the tank transfer will bring Australia’s contribution to Ukraine since the start of the conflict to $1.5bn, while the ADF also continues to contribute to efforts to train Ukrainian military personnel.

Despite the pledged military support, neither Australia nor the US has committed to covering maintenance costs or providing ammunition for the tanks — potentially limiting Ukraine’s ability to deploy them effectively.

Sources have previously told The Australian it would cost about $US100m ($153.7m) a year to keep the tanks in working order on the battlefield.

The arrival of the first tranche of Australian Army tanks comes as Russia’s invasion of Ukraine stretches into its 41st month and efforts to broker a ceasefire between the two countries have stalled.

This week, US President Donald Trump, in conjunction with NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte, announced a major arms package to build up Ukraine’s defences.

With Russian President Vladimir Putin ramping up missile and drone bombardments of Ukraine in the hopes of ending a deadlocked conflict, Mr Trump also threatened on Monday (Tuesday AEST) to slap “very severe” tariffs on Moscow unless it agreed to a ceasefire within 50 days.

Mr Trump’s increasingly tough stance against the Kremlin comes amid ardent efforts by European leaders to convince him to bolster armaments for Kyiv and drag Mr Putin toward serious negotiations that would bring about an end to the conflict.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/defence/first-tranche-of-australian-army-tanks-arrive-in-ukraine/news-story/4eb9fba53be4f9018fdf7626ab34f366

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109375

File: e6c5a54f5226423⋯.jpg (488.2 KB,750x1285,150:257,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 0aa045cdcbccbf3⋯.jpg (125.5 KB,1200x800,3:2,Clipboard.jpg)

File: bb00eadded374c5⋯.jpg (118.47 KB,1200x800,3:2,Clipboard.jpg)

File: d1df90e4d67dc78⋯.jpg (120.72 KB,1200x800,3:2,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 8f92c1c4f5ce621⋯.jpg (107.32 KB,1200x800,3:2,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23352316 (200915ZJUL25) Notable: Vasyl Myroshnychenko Tweet: The majority of the 49 M1A1 Abrams tanks, generously gifted by Australia, have now arrived in Ukraine. The final delivery is expected in the coming months. On behalf of the Government of Ukraine and every Ukrainian heart, I express our deepest and most sincere gratitude to Prime Minister @AlboMP and DPM @RichardMarlesMP This powerful gesture of solidarity is more than military support-it is a lifeline, a message that we are not alone in our darkest hour. As we continue to defend our land, our people, and our future from brutal Russian aggression, we are reminded that the fight for freedom, dignity, and justice is a shared one. Together, we stand for all those who believe in democracy, human rights, and the rule of law. Let this united stand serve as a warning to all who threaten peace: the free world will not be broken.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109374

Vasyl Myroshnychenko Tweet

Breaking News:

The majority of the 49 M1A1 Abrams tanks, generously gifted by Australia, have now arrived in Ukraine. The final delivery is expected in the coming months.

On behalf of the Government of Ukraine and every Ukrainian heart, I express our deepest and most sincere gratitude to Prime Minister @AlboMP and DPM @RichardMarlesMP This powerful gesture of solidarity is more than military support—it is a lifeline, a message that we are not alone in our darkest hour.

As we continue to defend our land, our people, and our future from brutal Russian aggression, we are reminded that the fight for freedom, dignity, and justice is a shared one. Together, we stand for all those who believe in democracy, human rights, and the rule of law.

Let this united stand serve as a warning to all who threaten peace: the free world will not be broken.

Access to photo and video gallery is here.

https://images.defence.gov.au/assets/S20251860

https://x.com/AmbVasyl/status/1946315441695301955

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109376

File: 9a4260e36661b44⋯.jpg (244.05 KB,2047x1152,2047:1152,Clipboard.jpg)

File: d0585a6995e8ea0⋯.jpg (123.56 KB,1279x720,1279:720,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 5ae961592d4efa9⋯.jpg (254.48 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23357327 (210938ZJUL25) Notable: Inspired by China, Anthony Albanese sets red lines for Donald Trump meeting — "I’m planning to have a defence policy that is in Australia’s national interest," Prime Minister Anthony Albanese stated as he outlined boundaries for future talks with US President Donald Trump. Reflecting on his recent trip to China, Albanese emphasized respect for both nations' interests, highlighting his opposition to US demands for pre-commitment on Taiwan support and increased defence spending. He also expressed confidence in AUKUS's alignment with Australia’s national interest. Albanese rejected criticism of his China trip, asserting that it was focused on learning from China’s urban planning and transport systems.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>73662 (pb)

>>109335

>>109337

Inspired by China, Anthony Albanese sets red lines for Donald Trump meeting

BEN PACKHAM - 20 July 2025

Anthony Albanese has vowed to draw clear lines when he meets Donald Trump on the limits of the nations’ partnership, as he declared Australia could learn from China’s fast-rail network and ­centrally planned cities.

Returning to Canberra after a record six-night visit to China, the Prime Minister said he was now focused on securing a first meeting with the US President.

“That’s a priority, and that will happen,” he said in an interview aboard his RAAF jet, amid criticism he had allowed Australia’s ties with its closest ally to drift.

While in China, the Prime Minister hit back at opposition claims that his itinerary was “indulgent”, saying his decision to visit the Great Wall of China and a panda sanctuary in Chengdu were aimed at showing “respect” to Australia’s biggest trading.

Mr Albanese told The Australian he would demonstrate his respect for Mr Trump “by engaging in a clear, forward manner, saying what we can do, what we can’t do”.

“It’s the way that I engage and build relationships,” he said.

“We’re not about to abandon our Pharmaceutical Benefit Scheme, for example.”

He defended his government’s approach to the US relationship, declaring “our relationship is a positive one”.

“It’s our most important alliance. Obviously, the current US administration has an ‘America First’ policy, as they call it,” Mr Albanese said.

“That has led to a different position on tariffs than what Australia does. So part of engaging is recognising that and dealing with it in our national interest, in the best way we can.”

As well as pushing back on US criticism of Australia’s PBS as part of Mr Trump’s tariff blitz, Mr Albanese has rejected Pentagon calls for Australia to pre-commit to supporting the US if it goes to war with China over Taiwan, and for Canberra to nearly double the ­nation’s defence budget.

Asked whether he was preparing to unveil a major defence spending package when he met with Mr Trump, Mr Albanese said: “I’m planning to have a defence policy that is in Australia’s national interest. Simple as that.

“That’s what we do – build on our capability.”

He was also dismissive of a review of AUKUS ordered by US Undersecretary of Defence for Policy Elbridge Colby, which some fear could force changes to the ­nations’ nuclear submarine pact.

“Look, AUKUS is in Australia’s national interest, and it’s in the interest of the US,” Mr Albanese said. He signalled the meeting with Mr Trump was likely to occur at a multilateral meeting, such as the upcoming Quad meeting in New Delhi, or the G20 in Johannesburg, rather than at the White House, where Ukraine’s Volodymyr Zelensky and South Africa’s Cyril Ramaphosa found themselves on the receiving end of presidential tirades.

“There’ll be multiple meetings between now and the end of the year. Australia and the US are both members of a range of international gatherings,” he said.

On a high after his trip to China, the self-confessed “urban policy nerd” lauded that country’s centrally planned cities and rapid transport links.

Despite concerns Australia would never have the market to make fast-rail a reality, Mr Albanese said “I think … we certainly can do”.

“We have our High Speed Rail Authority,” he said.

“I want the first part of that to be to Newcastle. It’s a way of taking pressure off the capital cities as well on the east coast.”

Mr Albanese, who has pledged $500m so far for the Sydney to Newcastle route, said he wanted to see progress on policy during this term of government.

“The person who is overseeing that for the commonwealth (Tim Parker) is the person who oversaw the Sydney Metro.

“Sydney Metro has been a huge success.”

“Obviously, it’s a very long-term project. We’re looking to receive the business case and to go through that this term.”

Mr Albanese also enthused over China’s smart cities, including a new “five minute city” in Chengdu that “will have business, residential and everything, all in one spot”.

Opposition foreign affairs spokeswoman Michaelia Cash said the Prime Minister needed to prioritise securing a meeting with Mr Trump after his “extended visit” to China.

“Mr Albanese needs to focus his international attention on securing the AUKUS alliance and gaining exemptions from US tariffs,” she said.

“At a time of global uncertainty, growing conflict and a growing list of issues in the Australia-US relationship, now is a time to build our influence in Washington, not diminish it.

“The US-Australia alliance in 2025 needs to be stronger than ever, not put on the back burner, as Mr Albanese has done.”

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/inspired-by-china-anthony-albanese-sets-red-lines-for-donald-trump-meeting/news-story/1558d8b3c87bd964daf22172c64dba9c

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109377

File: 0b90f81bcedb639⋯.jpg (3.1 MB,6000x4000,3:2,Clipboard.jpg)

File: bd35487f50a03cb⋯.jpg (1.76 MB,5325x3550,3:2,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23357341 (210945ZJUL25) Notable: ‘An element of trust’: Inside Xi and Albanese’s warm, funny private lunch in Beijing – Prime Minister Anthony Albanese described his private banquet with Chinese President Xi Jinping as “very personal,” saying, “We got to know each other a lot more … there was humour. That shows an element of trust.” He called the “unusual” lunch a sign the relationship had moved “beyond stabilisation” towards deeper engagement. While defending his China visit against Coalition criticism, Albanese also confirmed support for Beijing’s hosting of APEC 2026 and said outcomes on green steel and agricultural trade would build on the six-day trip’s momentum.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109325

>>109335

>>109337

‘An element of trust’: Inside Xi and Albanese’s warm, funny private lunch in Beijing

Paul Sakkal - July 21, 2025

1/2

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has feted a rare intimate lunch with Chinese President Xi Jinping as a moment of “trust” in an ambitious new phase in relations, after years of Australia pursuing a more limited policy of stabilisation.

Revealing details of the event for the first time, the prime minister also used an interview to shift his gaze to the domestic agenda, with Labor to pursue pre-election pledges to wipe 20 per cent off student debt and enshrine penalty rates in law, and rush through new laws to boost childcare centre safety after shock allegations of child abuse in Melbourne and Sydney.

However, the prime minister said he would not seek to pass a contentious super tax hike in the first fortnight of parliamentary sessions of the 48th parliament.

Instead, Labor’s 17 new MPs will deliver their maiden speeches, led by Ali France and Sarah Witty, who respectively toppled former Coalition leader Peter Dutton and ex-Greens leader Adam Bandt.

Albanese demanded the Coalition get out of the way of his agenda after it described his week of high-level talks in China as “indulgent” and a “working holiday”.

In an interview on his flight back to Australia, the prime minister provided details about a private banquet that Xi organised after the pair’s formal bilateral talks. Until now, he had not spoken at length about the private meal, which analysts have said was a treat few foreign leaders were handed when they travelled to Beijing.

“He was very personal. It was a very personal discussion,” Albanese said of the lunch in Beijing’s Great Hall on Tuesday.

“We got to know each other a lot more; a lot more about our backgrounds, our upbringing, our views, a lot more about everything … There was humour.

“That shows an element of trust, as well, to open up in that way.”

Facing the challenge of balancing Australia’s relations between Beijing and Australia’s chief security partner in Washington, the Labor leader declined to use the word “trust” when pressed on his relationship with China’s autocratic leader in a press conference last week.

Former prime minister Scott Morrison warned in The Australian on Saturday that Xi was flattering Albanese to subtly coerce Labor into accepting China’s plans for hegemony in the Indo-Pacific.

Albanese said the “unusual” private lunch was significant, and he agreed “absolutely” with the proposition that Labor was edging beyond the more cautious era of stabilisation that came after years of feuding between China and Australia.

“We’re adding layers to it … How does further development in the relationship occur?”

Xi is not known for his warmth in bilateral meetings. Former prime minister Kevin Rudd told the ABC in 2021 that he did not hear a sidesplitting joke in his hours of talks with Xi. Former Trump administration secretary of state Mike Pompeo once described Xi as “dour”.

“Of the dozens of world leaders I met, he was among the most unpleasant,” Pompeo wrote in 2023.

In a sign of tighter ties with Beijing, Albanese said Australia was supporting China’s hosting of the APEC summit next year. It is expected that Australia will unveil additional outcomes from the China trip in coming months on top of those dealing with trade and tourism already announced.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109378

File: de1ce5c27802f69⋯.jpg (480.44 KB,1536x2363,1536:2363,Clipboard.jpg)

File: c38e39b92fd7481⋯.jpg (171.13 KB,650x999,650:999,Clipboard.jpg)

File: cd6e8cf10922ac5⋯.jpg (209.51 KB,650x1000,13:20,Clipboard.jpg)

File: cdfe19c91652ba5⋯.jpg (335.25 KB,1536x2363,1536:2363,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23357378 (211010ZJUL25) Notable: Man arrested in Strathfield driving black ‘Chinese Police’ sedan with firearms, ammunition in boot – A 21-year-old man was arrested in Sydney’s inner west after police stopped a black sedan marked with “Chinese Police” insignia, including a bonnet with misspelt “POILCE.” Officers found 48 live rounds of ammunition in the boot, along with items allegedly used to impersonate police. The man produced a fake document claiming he was transporting Chinese consulate officials. A search of his Baulkham Hills home uncovered gel blasters, while his registered firearms were seized pending review. He faces multiple charges and is due before Burwood Local Court on July 22.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Man arrested in Strathfield driving black ‘Chinese Police’ sedan with firearms, ammunition in boot

Police in Sydney’s inner-west made a peculiar arrest on Friday after stopping a 21-year-old man armed to the teeth driving a black sedan.

Alex Blair - July 21, 2025

1/2

You don’t see this one every day.

Police in Sydney’s inner west made a peculiar arrest on Friday after stopping a 21-year-old man driving a black sedan in Strathfield.

Burwood Highway Patrol officers were conducting routine patrols at around 2:50pm on 18 July when they noticed a vehicle bearing “Chinese Police” markings.

On inspection of the vehicle, they found numerous “Chinese Police” insignia affixed to the passenger door panels and the bonnet.

The driver was charged after officers allegedly found firearms and ammunition in the boot.

Upon questioning, the man allegedly produced a fake document claiming the vehicle was being used to transport Chinese consulate officials.

During a search of the car, officers located a box containing 48 live rounds of ammunition in the trunk.

The man, who holds an active firearms licence, allegedly told police he believed it was “the best place to store his ammunition”.

Officers seized the ammunition along with other items suspected of being used to impersonate police.

They later gained access to the man’s Baulkham Hills residence, where they located two gel blaster firearms, which were also seized.

His registered firearms were taken pending a review of his firearms licence.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109379

File: 2dd06ee0a95a06c⋯.mp4 (15.49 MB,640x360,16:9,Clipboard.mp4)

File: 35d338f54dcf9db⋯.jpg (228.93 KB,1280x720,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 690e89746bc7899⋯.jpg (130.79 KB,1024x884,256:221,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23357388 (211015ZJUL25) Notable: Video: Confusion as ‘Chinese police’ car spotted on street in Melbourne’s southeast - It’s understood Australia’s foreign interference taskforce is investigating the vehicle - 18 April 2023 - https://archive.vn/d8OqC#18714060

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109378

2/2

The man was charged with multiple offences, including use display emergency services organisation insignia, driving motor vehicle with unlawful police insignia and possession of an unauthorised prohibited firearm.

He was granted conditional bail and is due to appear at Burwood Local Court on Tuesday, 22 July 2025.

At a glance, the man’s black sedan looked to be legitimate, if not for the misspelt “POILCE” emblazoned on his bonnet.

https://www.news.com.au/national/nsw-act/crime/man-arrested-in-strathfield-driving-black-chinese-police-sedan-with-firearms-ammunition-in-boot/news-story/2bc91276bb9a2889e9fef731b68ea4b5

https://qresear.ch/?q=chinese+police+car

Confusion as ‘Chinese police’ car spotted on street in Melbourne’s southeast

It’s understood Australia’s foreign interference taskforce is investigating the vehicle.

Molly Magennis - 18 April 2023

https://archive.vn/d8OqC#18714060

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109380

File: d352adc83eea2ff⋯.jpg (601.22 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 288312ca034ee5b⋯.jpg (238.05 KB,2047x1152,2047:1152,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 93815bcec886222⋯.jpg (189.14 KB,2047x1152,2047:1152,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23357406 (211023ZJUL25) Notable: Swing against Labor won’t stop Dean Winter trying to form government with crossbench – Tasmania faces political deadlock after another hung parliament, with Jeremy Rockliff’s Liberals on 14–15 seats and Dean Winter’s Labor stuck on 10 with its worst primary vote in a century. Rockliff claims the first mandate to govern, but crossbenchers hold the balance of power. Winter argues Tasmanians want “collaboration” and is pitching a “progressive majority” despite pledging no deals with Greens. Constitutional experts say Governor Barbara Baker may demand written agreements before commissioning either side.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109361

>>109362

>>109363

Swing against Labor won’t stop Dean Winter trying to form government with crossbench

MATTHEW DENHOLM - 20 July 2025

1/2

Tasmanian Liberal Premier Jeremy Rockliff is fighting to prove he can rule in a nightmare parliament with a progressive crossbench, as Opposition Leader Dean Winter embarks on a mission to turn Labor’s worst primary vote in a century into a workable government.

Mr Rockliff will have the first shot at forming government after Saturday’s state election, having won at least 14 seats in the 35-seat Assembly – the same number as in the last, failed ­parliament.

Despite a swing to his Liberal Party in almost every region, the Premier appears stuck on a likely 17 votes – one short of the 18 required to govern with confidence and supply.

Mr Winter, with just 10 seats – also unchanged – and a primary vote of just 25.9 per cent is pitching a “progressive majority” government to three green-left independents and the Greens, which could deliver him the 18 votes ­required.

Where the crossbenchers land is far from certain, with none yet declaring support for one side or the other.

Mr Rockliff on Sunday said Mr Winter had “no mandate” to govern after the voter backlash and he would ask Governor Barbara Baker to commission him to form a government.

“Mr Winter … has no mandate to govern with the Greens because he said he would do no deals and Tasmanians would look on that very poorly,” Mr Rockliff said. “That to me is an integrity issue.

“But Mr Winter has said today that we should be given the first opportunity to govern and that’s exactly what I intend to do.

“I will get on with the job and I will be going to the Governor to seek a recommissioning of our government.”

He said that would wait until the vote count was finished, which the Tasmanian Electoral Commission advised would be after the distribution of prefer­ences on July 29.

Mr Winter said he would stick to his pledge not to do a power-sharing “deal” with the Greens, but confirmed that he was talking to independents.

While acknowledging the Liberals would have the first opportunity to try to govern, he said he did not believe they could achieve the necessary 18 votes in the ­Assembly to guarantee supply and confidence.

“Tasmanians have voted for a change of approach and they want to see their politicians working better together,” he said. “And I accept that all of us need to change the way that we approach this.

“This is going to be about who can form a government that can last for four years. No one wants another early election, including myself and the Labor Party, so we’ve got to make this parliament work.”

Mr Winter has pitched power-sharing protocols and a “collaborative approach” to the inde­pendents but ruled out ditching any Labor policies in win their support, or that of the Greens, who have retained their five seats.

The Greens voted with three crossbenchers and Labor to express no confidence in Mr Rockliff in June and leader Rosalie Woodruff has expressed a willingness to work with Labor to form government.

On Sunday, she would not say whether the party would be willing to do so without Mr Winter providing any policy wins for the party.

“The first step is to have a conversation,” Dr Woodruff said. “Dean Winter hasn’t spoken to me. I’ll pick up the phone and have a conversation with him.”

Both Mr Rockliff and Mr Winter spoke to independents Peter George, Craig Garland, David O’Byrne and Kristie Johnston, while the Premier also spoke to likely Shooter, Fishers, Farmers MP Carlo Di Falco.

Liberal figures believe Mr Di Falco, who appears to have replaced former Jacqui Lambie Network MP in the largely rural seat of Lyons, is likely to support Mr Rockliff to govern.

However, Mr Garland, Mr ­George, Ms Johnston – all green-left leaning MPs – and Mr O’Byrne, a former Labor leader-turned-independent, are yet to declare their hands.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109381

File: 0302949723b29cb⋯.jpg (68.89 KB,1506x848,753:424,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 728c7d30067fbd1⋯.jpg (200.41 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 3c552d5fd9e6871⋯.jpg (185.74 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 4f7d1f6a6ca8db7⋯.jpg (237.1 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23357429 (211032ZJUL25) Notable: Childcare CCTV rollout risks becoming an ‘expensive mistake’ – Early Childhood Australia chief Samantha Page warned CCTV in centres would be “a very expensive mistake,” creating privacy risks and a false sense of security, calling instead for two staff to be present at all times. Goodstart Early Learning said cameras were “just one tool, and a minor one,” stressing active supervision by trained staff. Georgie Dent of parental advocacy organisation The Parenthood said “cameras don’t build trust – relationships do,” while Carolyn Smith of the United Workers Union warned of hacking risks. Minister Jess Walsh welcomed CCTV commitments but said clear policies would be required from September.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109236

>>109238

Childcare CCTV rollout risks becoming an ‘expensive mistake’

RACHEL BAXENDALE - 20 June 2025

The blanket rollout of CCTV in childcare centres will be an ­“expensive mistake”, creating a false sense of security and risking the misuse of footage by pred­ators, key early childhood experts are warning.

Early Childhood Australia chief Samantha Page said she understood the appeal of CCTV in the wake of revelations a fortnight ago that accused pedophile Joshua Dale Brown had been charged with more than 70 offences allegedly committed in Melbourne childcare centres.

“CCTV is not the answer. It needs to be about people and pedagogy,” Ms Page said, calling for a minimum requirement for two staff members to be present with children at all times.

Her view has been supported by other early childhood experts, but comes as Early Childhood Education Minister Jess Walsh welcomed announcements from childcare providers G8 Education and Affinity – which employed Mr Brown – that they will install CCTV across their centres.

“What we’ve got is a whole load of providers that are either inexperienced or trying to cut costs, and running single educators during opening and closing and thin numbers over breaks. That’s when we see children at risk,” Ms Page said.

“We’ve seen the introduction of CCTV has been a very expensive mistake in the UK. It’s created all kinds of privacy issues about who’s viewing the footage, and we’ve seen tragedies in UK centres because people are relying on cameras rather than checking on children in person. I understand why (CCTV) sounds so appealing, but I just think it’s going to be a very expensive mistake.

“We can put that money into educators. That’s what will deliver on children’s safety.”

Australia’s largest not-for-profit childcare provider, Goodstart Early Learning, has been trialling CCTV in some of its centres since 2022, but the organisation said CCTV was “just one tool, and a minor one, in keeping children safe”.

“Active supervision by qualified and well-trained educators and teachers working in a centre, where children always remain visible, is the key to safeguarding children,” a Goodstart spokeswoman said. She said the cameras were installed with strict privacy controls in place, with vision encrypted and unable to be accessed within centres.

“CCTV has a role to play but governments will have to consider how they fund a national program to support the rollout of CCTV in early learning centres as the costs are extremely high, in terms of installation costs, secure storage of data, and ongoing monitoring and review,” she said.

Georgie Dent, chief executive of parental advocacy organisation The Parenthood, echoed Ms Page’s concerns. “Installing CCTV might offer a false sense of security but it won’t prevent harm,” she said.

“Cameras don’t build trust – relationships do. The most important safeguard for children in early learning settings isn’t surveillance – it’s well-trained, well-supported, properly paid educators and robust systems that promote safety and accountability.

“CCTV is passive. It records but it doesn’t protect children in real time. Every dollar spent on surveillance is a dollar we’re not spending on improving educator-child ratios, professional development or wages – investments that are proven to improve outcomes and safety for children.”

United Workers Union early education director Carolyn Smith said there were serious risks associated with footage falling into the wrong hands. “If banks and Qantas can be hacked, how do we make sure the local education and care centre is safe?” Ms Smith said.

Senator Walsh said she welcomed the commitments from some providers to install CCTV cameras in their centres. “CCTV can be an important tool as part of provider obligations to maintain a strong child safe culture in their services,” she said.

Regulatory changes coming in from September 1 will require childcare services to have clear policies and procedures on taking, use, storage and destruction of photos and videos of children.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/childcare-cctv-rollout-risks-becoming-an-expensive-mistake/news-story/41ad5a1ab70fa028552f3c6f0719aa0e

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109382

File: 80d25c5021dd03c⋯.jpg (294.95 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 6281a0af548a0cd⋯.jpg (448.32 KB,2048x2048,1:1,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 436c10c4666800b⋯.jpg (201.12 KB,1440x1440,1:1,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23357456 (211044ZJUL25) Notable: Free speech no joke, says Giggle for Girls founder in appeal over transgender ‘Sweaty Balls’ laughter – Sall Grover, founder of the Giggle for Girls app, is appealing a Federal Court ruling that fined her $10,000 for laughing at satirical merchandise mocking transgender woman Roxanne Tickle. Grover’s lawyers argue her “momentary, reflexive laugh” at the “Sweaty Balls” candle, which caricatured Tickle’s comments on SBS Insight, was constitutionally protected political expression. They say penalising such courtroom reactions “chills political engagement and penalises dissent.” Grover maintains her app excluded Tickle based on “visual impression of maleness,” not gender identity. Appeals begin August 4.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109282

>>109298

Free speech no joke, says Giggle for Girls founder in appeal over transgender ‘Sweaty Balls’ laughter

STEPHEN RICE - July 20, 2025

1/2

When Giggle for Girls app founder Sall Grover burst out laughing in court at a caricature of transgender woman Roxanne Tickle, she couldn’t have imagined it would spark a constitutional ­battle over the limits of free speech.

That spontaneous laugh has turned the sex discrimination case about female-only spaces into an equally watershed test of whether a joke or insulting remark about trans gender people can be protected speech under law.

In a new submission responding to a cross-appeal filed by ­Tickle, Grover’s legal team argues that her “momentary, reflexive laugh” in response to political satire was protected by the implied freedom of political communication in the Constitution.

“If the freedom protects mockery, it protects response to mockery,” Grover’s lawyers claim in a submission lodged with the Federal Court late on Friday.

Even highly offensive statements and insults may constitute protected political expression, the submission argues, otherwise the effect would be “to chill pol­itical engagement and penalise dissent”.

Grover is appealing judge Robert Bromwich’s ruling in the Federal Court last year that she indirectly discriminated against Tickle by rejecting her from the female-only Giggle networking app because she looked like a man.

Tickle is also appealing parts of Justice Bromwich’s decision, arguing the judge should have found she was the victim of direct, rather than indirect, discrimin­ation and that Grover should pay her at least $40,000 for the hurt caused.

Under cross-examination during the case, Grover was confronted with a piece of crowd-funding merchandise sold online – a scented candle taking a satirical jab at Tickle’s claim that she ­realised she was a woman because she “hated the smell of balls”.

The “Sweaty Balls” scented soy candle was on sale at $37.30, but her involuntary laugh cost Grover $10,000.

Justice Bromwich was not amused, awarding aggravated damages for her “offensive and belittling” outburst.

Grover rebuts Tickle’s claim that the $10,000 penalty was “manifestly inadequate”, arguing the damages award was “infected by legal error” and should never have been made.

The only basis for the award “was a brief and involuntary act of laughter” by Grover – reacting to a proposition put to her by Tickle’s counsel – that the judge found was not deliberate, malicious, or intended to cause harm, the submission says. The laughter was a “momentary, reflexive laugh” and a “spontaneous courtroom response”, and Tickle should not be allowed to increase “this already flawed reward”.

More importantly, Grover’s legal team argues, imposing liability “for expressive conduct during litigation” raises a potentially serious constitutional issue.

“The conduct in question occurred in court, during adversarial proceedings, in response to cross-examination in respect of political satire. The subject of that satire – a basis on which (Tickle) had publicly claimed to be a woman – is at the core of political discourse in this litigation.

“To penalise expressive response to that claim is to burden political communication.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109383

File: ddc1df9a3ef91fe⋯.jpg (198.48 KB,1920x1080,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: a623f32a9a105c4⋯.jpg (329.57 KB,2000x1333,2000:1333,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23357461 (211052ZJUL25) Notable: Dutch defence chief warns Australia to increase military capability – Visiting for Talisman Sabre, Netherlands Chief of Defence General Onno Eichelsheim warned that China’s rise in the Indo-Pacific mirrors Russia’s threat to Europe, urging Australia to prepare: “If you prepare for war, you can avoid war.” The Netherlands has lifted defence spending to 3.5% of GDP under U.S. pressure, but Eichelsheim stressed “it’s not about the percentage, it’s about the capabilities.” He said Australia “inevitably” must increase capabilities, both for regional security and support to Europe. Defence Minister Richard Marles insisted Australia is funding targeted capabilities, not arbitrary spending benchmarks.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109316

>>109318

>>109224

>>109320

Dutch defence chief warns Australia to increase military capability

Tom Lowrey - 21 July 2025

The Netherlands' chief of defence has warned Australian leaders the country needs to counter China's military rise by increasing its own defence capability.

General Onno Eichelsheim, visiting Australia for the Talisman Sabre defence exercises, warned the threat posed by China to the Indo-Pacific is not unlike that Russia poses to Europe.

And he says "naivety" should not allow Australia and other countries to avoid preparing for the risk of conflict in future.

"You should look at the facts that are around you … if Russia tells us that they want to have more, more influence, than take that seriously," he said.

"And if you see in this case in this region, China building up, take it seriously and get ready for something that you hope will never happen.

"If you prepare for war, you can avoid war. And that's how we look at it."

The Netherlands recently agreed to lift its defence spending to 3.5 per cent of its GDP, alongside most other NATO countries.

The decision came in part due to pressure from the United States for NATO countries to provide more for their own security.

Australia has faced its own pressure from the United States to lift defence spending to the same level.

General Eichelsheim said 3.5 per cent of GDP would provide the Netherlands with the capability the country needs, given the security situation in Europe.

He said while the focus on GDP percentages was not important, there was no doubt Australia would need to do more.

"It's not about the percentage, it's about the capabilities," he said.

"But inevitably, I think Australia has to increase its capabilities as well, if you look at the region, and the build-up in this case of China.

"Also, if they need to help out Europe, which [Australia is] actually already doing — if you look at the war in Ukraine, and supporting us there."

Netherlands watching Russia's risk

In April General Eichelsheim issued an order to the country's 76,000 defence personnel, both uniformed and civilian.

The top-ranking Dutch military official warned they needed to increase their readiness and be ready for rapid deployment.

He said the message was sent for two reasons: that a ceasefire in the war in Ukraine might need to be protected, and that it might lead Russia to shift its attention elsewhere.

"We know that [Russia has] the ability, if there is a ceasefire, they can move within one or two years to other locations where they can threaten, for instance, the Baltic States," he said.

"So we need to be ready to defend that line as well. And that is not that much time, to be honest."

The Netherlands is one of 19 countries taking part in the Talisman Sabre defence exercises, which are jointly organised by Australia and the United States.

The Dutch defence personnel taking part are also joined by other European militaries like France, Germany and Norway.

Asked why the Netherlands is taking an interest in the region, and how he views the security situation in the Indo-Pacific, General Eichelsheim said he has real concerns.

"We worry about the amount of capabilities that China is building up," he said.

"Those are not capabilities that you only use for protecting yourself. There are also quite a lot of offensive capabilities in it.

"Leaving it only to the US versus China is also not a good idea — so we've increased our partnerships a lot with Japan, the Republic of Korea, Australia, New Zealand and also the Philippines."

Marles says capabilities are what counts

The Albanese government has pushed back on the United States' calls for significant increases in defence spending, arguing spending is already rising quickly.

The prime minister has argued Australia will set its own defence policy, and made the case that specific capabilities should be funded, rather than funding targets set and pursued.

Asked about whether pressure might come from other allies rapidly increasing defence spending as a share of GDP, Defence Minister Richard Marles said those countries can see what Australia is doing.

"We understand there is a process of international benchmarking, but ultimately every country, when it goes through its own processes about what kind of defence force it needs to build, does so based on assessing its own strategic need," he said.

"And that's exactly what we're doing and I think countries can see that we are engaging in that process, it's an ongoing process and a process which up until this point has yielded the biggest peacetime increase in Australia's defence spending."

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-07-21/dutch-defence-chief-warning-on-australian-military/105553010

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109384

File: 10dba5ba072e425⋯.jpg (127.36 KB,910x568,455:284,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 066d2aa4ce04cc4⋯.jpg (120.12 KB,910x568,455:284,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 0704866dab0b191⋯.jpg (131.76 KB,910x568,455:284,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23357475 (211101ZJUL25) Notable: Talisman Sabre 2025: Marines rehearse remote airfield seizures during massive Indo-Pacific drills – U.S. Marines and Australian troops practiced seizing remote airstrips in the Outback as part of Talisman Sabre 2025, involving 35,000 personnel from 19 nations. Airstrips at Timber Creek, Nackeroo, and Cloncurry stood in for island bases in a future conflict, with Marines arriving by MV-22B Ospreys and KC-130Js. A Typhon system also fired an SM-6 missile from Bradshaw, the first live launch in the Western Pacific. Marines established command posts, refueling points, and air traffic control, encountering only “small sporadic fire teams” in the exercise scenario.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109224

>>109320

Talisman Sabre 2025: Marines rehearse remote airfield seizures during massive Indo-Pacific drills

SETH ROBSON, STARS AND STRIPES - July 21, 2025

CLONCURRY, Australia - U.S. Marines and Australian soldiers pushed deep into the Outback in recent days to practice seizing remote airstrips, part of preparations for potential operations across the vast Indo-Pacific.

The training is part of Talisman Sabre, a biennial multinational exercise that began July 13 and runs through Aug. 4. More than 35,000 personnel from 19 nations are participating this year.

Since the exercise began, the Marines and Australian troops have captured airstrips at Timber Creek and Nackeroo in the Northern Territory, and at Cloncurry in Queensland, said Capt. Johnny Fischer, a spokesman for the 2,500-strong Marine Rotational Force-Darwin.

The airstrips are standing in for island facilities that the Marines could be tasked with seizing in a future contingency, Fischer told Stars and Stripes in Cloncurry on Sunday.

MV-22B Ospreys with Marine Medium Tiltrotor Squadron 363, based in Hawaii, have flown Marines and Australian troops to their objectives. A recreational vehicle equipped with high-tech communications gear served as the command-and-control center during a 1,000-mile journey from Darwin to Cloncurry, Fischer said.

A five-vehicle convoy carrying 20 Marines, including cyber defenders, arrived near each airstrip ahead of the simulated raids.

The first runway seized was at Timber Creek, 376 miles south of Darwin. Troops then moved on to the Nackeroo airstrip at Bradshaw Field Training Area.

In May 2024, the Australian Defence Department announced the completion of upgrades at Nackeroo, including a runway extension and parking for aircraft, including Ospreys and C-17A Globemaster IIIs. The work is a major part of a $486 million package of upgrades to Northern Territory training areas and ranges, according to the department’s website.

Separately, the U.S. Army on July 15 struck a maritime target with an SM-6 missile launched from the Bradshaw area – marking the first live fire by a Typhon launch system in the Western Pacific. Marines helped ensure the surrounding airspace was clear, Fischer said.

On Friday, the Marines and Australians conducted another airborne raid to seize Cloncurry using Ospreys. Marine air traffic controllers took up positions beside the runway, and support personnel established a forward arming and refueling point, while additional Marines arrived Sunday on a KC-130J Super Hercules to assume control of the airport.

Australian troops then departed for Shoalwater Bay Training Area on Queensland’s east coast.

Flying deep into the Outback was a new experience for many Marines, said Capt. Kendall Weigand, a KC-130J pilot with Marine Aerial Refueler Transport Squadron 153, also based in Hawaii.

“It’s wide open, wild terrain that’s unique to Australia,” he told Stars and Stripes after landing at Cloncurry. “We dropped into a canyon and saw a herd of wild horses. We were hoping for kangaroos.”

The arriving Marines encountered minimal resistance in the exercise scenario, said their commander, 1st Lt. Max Burke of 2nd Platoon, Company E, 2nd Battalion, 1st Marine Regiment.

“Only small sporadic fire teams are what’s expected,” he said.

Maj. Jamie Frisby, commander of the Australian troops at the airport, recommended a local bakery to the newly arrived Marines.

“They’re bringing the pies to us,” he said.

https://www.stripes.com/theaters/asia_pacific/2025-07-21/marines-seize-airstrips-talisman-sabre-18504131.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109385

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23357490 (211116ZJUL25) Notable: Video: Talisman Sabre 2025: Providing coastal protection far from home – U.S. Coast Guard Security Unit 307 joined Talisman Sabre 2025 in Darwin, integrating with the 2nd Australian Division to protect vital infrastructure. After a Welcome to Country and training with Australian troops, the Coast Guard began layered port defence drills alongside the 12th/40th Battalion, Royal Tasmania Regiment. “To be able to work alongside the Aussies is invaluable learning for us,” said Lt. Nicholas Haas. Lt. Doug Shephard added, “There’s always something to learn.” The joint effort focuses on securing the Port of Darwin through combined sea and shore defence.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109224

>>109320

>>109336

Talisman Sabre 2025: Providing coastal protection far from home

defence.gov.au - 21 JULY 2025

They may be a long way from their home base of Clearwater, Florida, but the United States Coast Guard personnel from Security Unit 307 are starting to feel like honorary Aussies.

After arriving at Larrakeyah Defence Precinct in Darwin for Exercise Talisman Sabre 2025, the US Coast Guard team were treated to a Welcome to Country and a smoking ceremony by Elders from the Larrakia Nation.

Soldiers from 8th Brigade also took the guardsmen and women through Australian Army EF88 Austeyr rifle training at Robertson Barracks.

And now the US Coast Guard personnel have been incorporated into the 2nd (Australian) Division task force in Darwin protecting vital infrastructure across the city.

US Coast Guard officer Lieutenant Nicholas Haas is relishing the opportunity to work side-by-side with Australian Army Reserve soldiers from 12th/40th Battalion, Royal Tasmania Regiment, at HMAS Coonawarra.

“To be able to work alongside the Aussies is invaluable learning for us,” Lieutenant Haas said.

“We get to learn to speak a little bit of Army, understand what capabilities they bring and how they can be best used in port defence.”

It’s not all one-way, though, and Australian Army officer Lieutenant Doug Shephard who is leading the 12th/40th Battalion’s direct-fire support platoon, is learning as much as he can, too.

“It’s always great being able to work with partners such as the US Coast Guard,” Lieutenant Shephard said.

“There’s always something to learn and inevitably, you see things we haven’t come across before, so every opportunity we get to exchange ideas and practices, we jump at it.”

The training undertaken by the two partner units is all part of the critical task of protecting northern Australia.

“Our tasking on Exercise Talisman Sabre is to provide security for the Port of Darwin,” Lieutenant Haas said.

“To achieve that we’re doing a layered point defence, where we have our small boats out on the water providing security and our shore-side element is in multiple positions should any craft get past the boats.

“It all revolves around area defence and key point protection so providing defence and security for military or civilian infrastructure, which is obviously critical for the northern part of this country.”

Exercise Talisman Sabre will run until August 4.

https://www.defence.gov.au/news-events/news/2025-07-21/providing-coastal-protection-far-from-home

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m8mbAfC-DaA

>Talisman Sabre

MAGIC SWORD

https://qalerts.pub/?q=Operation+Specialists

https://qalerts.pub/?q=magic

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109386

File: 3eef2b01a7f55d5⋯.jpg (1.75 MB,3801x2534,3:2,Clipboard.jpg)

File: da91528f31b1627⋯.jpg (2.14 MB,4032x2599,4032:2599,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23361911 (220926ZJUL25) Notable: Australia, UK, France and other nations call for immediate end to war in Gaza – Twenty-eight countries, including Australia, the UK, France and Japan, signed a joint statement demanding an immediate ceasefire in Gaza and the release of hostages. The statement, signed by Foreign Minister Penny Wong, condemned Israel’s “drip feeding of aid” and “inhumane killing” of Palestinians, noting more than 800 people have died near aid sites run by the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation. Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke called it Australia’s strongest language yet. Israel rejected the statement as “disconnected from reality”, blaming Hamas for prolonging the war. The US did not sign.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Australia, UK, France and other nations call for immediate end to war in Gaza

abc.net.au - 22 July 2025

1/2

Twenty-eight countries, including Australia, the UK and France, are demanding an immediate end to the war in Gaza and for Israel to lift aid restrictions.

The joint statement, signed by Foreign Minister Penny Wong, comes amid growing international concern over the number of deaths at aid sites in the enclave.

It criticises what it calls the "inhumane killing" of Palestinians and condemns the "drip feeding of aid".

The majority of people killed in recent weeks have been in the vicinity of Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF) sites, which the United States and Israel backed to take over aid distribution in Gaza from a network led by the United Nations.

"We, the signatories listed below, come together with a simple, urgent message: the war in Gaza must end now," the foreign ministers of Britain, Australia, France, Italy, Japan, Canada, Denmark and other countries, and an EU commissioner, said in a joint statement.

"We are prepared to take further action to support an immediate ceasefire and a political pathway to security and peace for Israelis, Palestinians and the entire region," they added.

The statement also voices sharp condemnation of the Israeli government's aid delivery model.

"The suffering of civilians in Gaza has reached new depths. The Israeli government's aid delivery model is dangerous, fuels instability and deprives Gazans of human dignity," it said.

"We condemn the drip feeding of aid and the inhumane killing of civilians, including children, seeking to meet their most basic needs of water and food.

"It is horrifying that over 800 Palestinians have been killed while seeking aid. The Israeli Government's denial of essential humanitarian assistance to the civilian population is unacceptable.

"Israel must comply with its obligations under international humanitarian law."

On Tuesday, Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke said the joint statement represented Australia's strongest comment yet since the beginning of the conflict in Gaza.

"We've seen too many images of children being killed, of horrific slaughter, of churches being bombed," he told the ABC.

"The images that we've seen have been pretty clear that so much of this is indefensible, and as that statement referred to, aid being drip-fed in.

"None of this changes the fact that the hostages need to be released, of course that needs to happen, but what we are watching on the other side of the world is indefensible.

"The hostages still need to be released, but the war needs to end."

The joint statement also includes a condemnation of Hamas's treatment of hostages held captive since the group's October 7, 2023, attack in Israel.

"We condemn their continued detention and call for their immediate and unconditional release," it said.

"A negotiated ceasefire offers the best hope of bringing them home and ending the agony of their families."

The statement was signed by EU Commissioner for Equality, Preparedness and Crisis Management Hadja Lahbib, Senator Wong and the foreign ministers of Austria, Belgium, Cyprus, Canada, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Greece, Japan, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, The Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland and the UK.

It said the countries "strongly oppose any steps towards territorial or demographic change in the Occupied Palestinian Territories".

It said that if the E1 settlement plan announced by Israel's Civil Administration was implemented, it would divide a Palestinian state in two.

This would mark a "flagrant breach of international law and critically undermine the two-state solution," the statement added.

The 28 countries went on to urge other members of the international community to "unite in a common effort to bring this terrible conflict to an end, through an immediate, unconditional and permanent ceasefire".

"Further bloodshed serves no purpose," they said.

"We reaffirm our complete support to the efforts of the US, Qatar and Egypt to achieve this," they added.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109387

File: d1b59281273f25a⋯.jpg (236.1 KB,2047x1152,2047:1152,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 1fd6437a8531d90⋯.jpg (220.46 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: f15acba68dd6a48⋯.jpg (343.55 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23361918 (220932ZJUL25) Notable: Labor brands Israeli conduct in Gaza ‘indefensible’ after 28-nation statement – Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke declared Israel’s actions in Gaza “indefensible” after Australia joined 27 countries in condemning the “horrifying” killing of Palestinians and demanding an immediate ceasefire. The joint statement, signed by Penny Wong, criticised Israel’s “drip feeding” of aid and warned against forced removal of Palestinians. US Ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee called the statement “disgusting”, while Israel’s top diplomat in Australia, Amir Maimon, said it was “disconnected from reality”. The UN reported 875 deaths near aid sites since July 13.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109386

Labor brands Israeli conduct in Gaza ‘indefensible’ after 28-nation statement

BEN PACKHAM - 22 July 2025

One of the Albanese government’s most senior ministers has lashed Israel’s conduct in Gaza as “indefensible” after Australia joined with 27 other countries to condemn the “horrifying” killing of Palestinians and demand an immediate end to the war.

Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke said the statement – branded “disgusting” by the US’s top diplomat in Israel – was Australia’s strongest since the war began, reflecting the scale of the humanitarian disaster in the territory.

“We’ve seen too many images of children being killed, of horrific slaughter, of churches being bombed,” Mr Burke told the ABC. “None of this changes the fact that the hostages need to be released, of course that needs to happen. But what we are watching on the other side of the world is indefensible. The hostages still need to be released, but the war needs to end.”

The statement, signed by Foreign Minister Penny Wong and backed by the UK, Japan, New Zealand, and a raft of European nations, said Israel’s “drip feeding” of aid into Gaza was dangerous and unacceptable, and warned its plan to remove Palestinians from the territory would breach international law. “The suffering of civilians in Gaza has reached new depths,” it said.

“We urge the parties and the international community to unite in a common effort to bring this terrible conflict to an end, through an immediate, unconditional and permanent ceasefire. Further bloodshed serves no purpose.”

US Ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee blasted the statement on social media, saying Israel wasn't to blame for the conflict. “Disgusting! 25 nations (later 28) put pressure on Israel instead of savages of Hamas! Gaza suffers for 1 reason: Hamas rejects EVERY proposal. Blaming Israel is irrational,” he wrote on X.

Israel’s top diplomat in Australia, Amir Maimon, responded in a social media post: “Israel rejects the joint statement published by a group of countries, including Australia, as it is disconnected from ­reality and sends the wrong message to Hamas.”

The statement came as hundreds of protesters rallied outside Parliament House in Canberra, holding dolls shrouded in white cloth, representing babies killed in the Palestinian territory.

The UN said 875 people had been killed in Gaza since July 13 while trying to get food, including 674 in the vicinity of new Israeli-controlled aid hubs that have been widely criticised by the inter­national community.

Opposition Leader Sussan Ley said while the Coalition wanted to “see aid reach those who deserve it”, it was Hamas’s responsibility to release its hostages and allow aid to reach civilians.

“There are still hostages in Gaza, there are still hostages hidden in tunnels, and a way to end the situation is for those hostages to be released by the terrorists Hamas who control so much of the activity there,” she said.

The Executive Council of Australian Jewry said Israel wanted an end to the war “but that can only happen with the release of the 50 hostages and assurances that Hamas will not retain effective control over Gaza”.

“There is immense suffering right now, which cannot be denied,” ECAJ president Daniel Aghion said. “The solution is the permanent removal of the terrorist force that started this war and their release of all hostages.

“Anything less would guarantee a return to war and further suffering… All sides need a ceasefire but we (must) ensure this is the last Israel-Hamas war.”

The Australia Palestine Advocacy Network said the statement was “dangerously insufficient and months too late”.

“The time for these statements has long passed. People are starving to death because Israel refuses to allow aid into the hellscape it created in Gaza. Families are being bombed and gunned down while trying to access water,” APAN president Nasser Mashni said.

“If Australia has even a shred of moral courage left, it must act now – with sanctions akin to the 1400 sanctions it imposed on Russia, with a two-way arms embargo, and with unequivocal support for international accountability for the genocidal rogue state of Israel through the International Criminal Court and International Court of Justice.”

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/labor-brands-israeli-conduct-in-gaza-indefensible-after-28-nation-statement/news-story/e9510eac1b34aadd310b3df429e793f4

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109388

File: 0d8c6611c0c4f2e⋯.jpg (905.21 KB,3984x2656,3:2,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 088ae1463429860⋯.jpg (440.76 KB,2047x1152,2047:1152,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 05f758ffd3796a5⋯.jpg (215.49 KB,1216x1360,76:85,Clipboard.jpg)

File: e051eb757d89988⋯.jpg (436.84 KB,2047x1152,2047:1152,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 505a5d5cdbe642a⋯.jpg (221.69 KB,2047x1152,2047:1152,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23361926 (220942ZJUL25) Notable: Pro-Palestine protesters disrupt opening of parliament – Seventeen activists were detained inside Parliament House after chanting “free, free Palestine” during Governor-General Sam Mostyn’s speech, while hundreds more rallied outside, some clashing with police. Greens deputy leader Mehreen Faruqi held a “Sanction Israel” sign and shouted at Anthony Albanese, while Bob Katter retorted “they started it” in reference to Hamas’s October 7 attacks. Demonstrators displayed images of dead children and staged mock funerals; one man stood on a police car before being ordered down. The protest followed Labor’s strongest rebuke of Israel yet, co-signing a 28-nation letter condemning civilian deaths and aid restrictions in Gaza.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109386

>>109387

Pro-Palestine protesters disrupt opening of parliament

Nick Newling and Brittany Busch - July 22, 2025

Pro-Palestine protesters were detained in Parliament House during a rally on Tuesday, while hundreds more massed on the lawns outside in a gathering that briefly grew so rowdy that one attendee stood on a police car.

Seventeen protesters were held in an antechamber off parliament’s Marble Hall for around an hour by police and building security as they shouted protest chants of “free, free Palestine” while Governor-General Sam Mostyn addressed the Senate.

Mehreen Faruqi held a sign in solidarity with the protesters during the entirety of Mostyn’s speech – “Gaza is starving. Words won’t feed them. Sanction Israel” – before the deputy Greens leader shouted at Prime Minister Anthony Albanese to “sanction Israel” as he left the chamber.

Albanese did not respond, but the member for Kennedy, Bob Katter, was heard calling out “they started it” – seemingly referring to the October 7 attacks from Hamas where the terror group killed more than 1200 people in Israel – as the chamber emptied.

An Australian Federal Police spokesman confirmed that officers detained a group of 17 people to confirm their identities and then removed them from Parliament House after they caused a disturbance on Tuesday afternoon.

“They will be issued formal banning notices at a later date,” the spokesman said. “At about 3pm, one woman was arrested outside Parliament House by protective service officers and she has been transported to the ACT watch house. She is expected to be charged with failing to obey the direction of a protective service officer.”

Before being detained, protesters inside the building were heard yelling at police to use gender-neutral language after being referred to as “ladies and gentlemen”, and shouted that “history will remember” those opposed to their cause before they were escorted out.

Outside, the AFP formed a border at the front of Parliament House, behind which protesters held up images of children killed in Israel’s Gaza offensive.

A man climbed onto the top of an AFP car, yelling, before officers ordered him down, while the public were barred from entering parliament.

Demonstrators had earlier lined the roads, holding bundles wrapped in funeral cloth to resemble dead children.

It was the second day of protests after activists were arrested on Monday for scaling a business in the industrial Canberra suburb of Hume, accusing the firm of contributing to weapons used in Israel.

Israel’s foreign ministry said on Tuesday that Hamas was to blame for the conflict. “Hamas is the sole party responsible for the continuation of the war and the suffering on both sides,” the ministry posted on X.

It argued the terror group was harming civilians who came to receive aid from the US and Israel-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation.

The protest in Canberra came after the government made its strongest condemnation yet of the Israeli government’s conduct in Gaza, signing a letter alongside 27 other countries on Tuesday morning. The joint statement condemned the “drip feeding of aid and the inhumane killing of civilians, including children”.

https://www.theage.com.au/politics/federal/pro-palestine-protesters-disrupt-opening-of-parliament-20250722-p5mgyc.html

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/breaking-news/propalestine-protesters-gather-at-parliament-house-as-pollies-return/news-story/93127c95a31eb34b48c3127820f6b0e3

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109389

File: e2c6f1d73051580⋯.jpg (85.33 KB,1280x721,1280:721,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23361932 (220946ZJUL25) Notable: Accused childcare pedophile Joshua Brown ‘may face more charges’: court – Prosecutors told Melbourne Magistrates’ Court they may lay further charges against former childcare worker Joshua Brown, already accused of 70 child sex offences against eight children aged between five months and two years. Brown, 26, allegedly offended while employed at Creative Garden Early Learning Centre, Point Cook, between April 2022 and January 2023, and worked at 24 centres statewide. Magistrate Donna Bakos granted prosecutors more time, adjourning the case to February 2026, and released charge sheets to the media. Linked accused Michael Wilson, facing rape and child abuse charges, also had his case delayed.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109236

>>109238

Accused childcare pedophile Joshua Brown ‘may face more charges’: court

LILY MCCAFFREY - 22 July 2025

Prosecutors have been granted more time to prepare their case against alleged pedophile Joshua Brown, with a court hearing there was the potential for further charges to be brought against the former childcare worker.

The Office of Public Prosecutions on Tuesday applied for an extension of time to compile its evidence and have the committal mention for Mr Brown - charged with 70 child sex offences - pushed back from September 15 this year to February 10 2026.

Magistrate Donna Bakos granted the application, which was unopposed by Mr Brown’s lawyer, Rishi Nathwani KC.

Mr Brown, 26, in custody since his arrest in May, was excused from appearing at Tuesday’s brief hearing in the Melbourne Magistrates’ Court.

Mr Nathwani flagged the possibility of detectives bringing further charges against Mr Brown, and said the lack of certainty meant that an application by media agencies to obtain the police charge sheets should be opposed.

Mr Nathwani argued it would be “premature” to release the charge sheets to media outlets on Tuesday “because the charges are in flux”.

“It would hinder the realisation of natural justice … at this stage,” he said.

However, Ms Bakos said she was not prepared to restrict access to the charge sheets and granted their release.

“They are the charges that are before the court,” Ms Bakos said.

Mr Brown was this month charged with 70 child sex offences allegedly committed against eight children aged between five months and two years.

Mr Brown – who worked at 24 childcare centres across the state – is alleged to have committed the offences at Creative Garden Early Learning Centre in Point Cook in Melbourne’s west between April 2022 and January 2023.

Among the 70 charges are sexual ­penetration of a child, attempted sexual penetration of a child, sexual assault of a child, sexual activity in presence of a child and the production of child abuse ­material for use through a ­carriage service.

The court on Tuesday also heard an application from the Office of Public Prosecutions to move the court date for Michael Simon Wilson, who has been linked to Mr Brown, from September 15 to November 15 2025.

Mr Wilson, 36, was charged in relation to an alleged sexual assault of a teenage boy on April 16 in Hoppers Crossing, in Melbourne’s south west.

Victoria Police previously confirmed detectives had charged Mr Wilson with a range of sexual offences in relation to the alleged assault, including rape, while the Magistrates Court previously said the nature of the charges included child abuse material, sex offences and bestiality.

The relationship between Mr Wilson - who is not a childcare worker - and Mr Brown remains unclear.

A police investigation is underway into Mr Brown, who authorities believe worked across 24 Victorian childcare centres and one children’s occupational therapy service between January 2017 and May this year.

Authorities recommended 2000 children be tested for infectious diseases in the wake of the allegations against Mr Brown.

The Office of Public Prosecutions will be required to serve a hand-up brief of its evidence against Mr Brown by 4 December 2025.

A hand-up brief of evidence against Mr Wilson is due by 4 October 2025.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/accused-childcare-paedophile-joshua-brown-may-face-more-charges-court/news-story/282898a3a53d5c85bb1ec43b001bc86c

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109390

File: 473e667625f5edc⋯.jpg (1.46 MB,2637x3955,2637:3955,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 6399abb7c52cd29⋯.jpg (106.52 KB,767x439,767:439,Clipboard.jpg)

File: dbf1ef55f613ac6⋯.jpg (156.12 KB,1049x554,1049:554,Clipboard.jpg)

File: a5c399deafab5b5⋯.jpg (229.73 KB,1200x794,600:397,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23361943 (220952ZJUL25) Notable: Rocket launch demonstration off Jervis Bay shows military might as part of Talisman Sabre – Japanese Self-Defense Forces fired two advanced Type 12 anti-ship missiles in Jervis Bay during Talisman Sabre 2025, their most sophisticated demonstration yet, with missiles striking simultaneously after being fired with different trajectories. Exercise director Brigadier Damian Hill said over 1,500 Japanese personnel are participating, reflecting deepened ties since Japan first joined as an observer in 2017. The three-week drills involve 19 nations and 40,000 personnel, expanding to Christmas Island for the first time. Australia also live-fired HIMARS rockets, showcasing rapid modernisation, while Chinese surveillance ships monitored the exercises.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109224

>>109320

Rocket launch demonstration off Jervis Bay shows military might as part of Talisman Sabre

Romy Gilbert and Justin Huntsdale - 22 July 2025

Japanese forces have fired their most advanced anti-ship missiles off the coast of New South Wales for a second time as part of a military training exercise involving a record 19 countries.

Japan's Self-Defense Force (JSDF) first conducted a live fire demonstration of Type 12 surface-to-ship missile at a weapons range in Jervis Bay during exercise Talisman Sabre 2023.

This time around, they had more to show.

"Last time it was about proving we could fire the missile in the Southern Hemisphere just to ensure the range apparatus and the safety mechanisms," Talisman Sabre exercise director Brigadier Damian Hill said.

"The Japanese have [today] fired two sea-skimming missiles moving 10 to 15 miles as the crow flies, about 70 miles through different types of terrain.

"Both missiles fired with different trajectories and hit the target at the same time."

Brigadier Hill said the JSDF had brought a level of sophistication the defence force had not seen from the Japanese military before.

Observer countries become major players

Talisman Sabre is Australia's largest military exercise and is designed to show military strength and a commitment to peace and protection in the Indo–Pacific region.

It started as a bilateral partnership between the United States and has grown to involve 19 countries and more than 40,000 personnel.

For the first time this year, Papua New Guinea has joined.

Brigadier Hill said the Australian and Japanese forces had strengthened defence ties since their involvement with Talisman Sabre as an observer back in 2017.

"There are over 1,500 Japanese personnel here undertaking the live firing," he said.

"We now have a reciprocal access agreement, which enables us to train a lot more and in different types of environments."

Prepared for uncertain times

While Chinese surveillance ships have again monitored the activities of Talisman Sabre, Brigadier Hill said the exercise was not about sending a military warning to specific countries.

"This is about us working together and demonstrating our willingness to maintain peace and security in the Indo–Pacific," he said.

The 11th iteration of the three-week Talisman Sabre has been running across north-eastern parts of Australia, including for the first time at Christmas Island, and is expected to finish next week.

Brigadier Hill said the exercise involved training against potential threats on air, land and water as well as cyber and space.

He said, for the first time, Australia launched its own HIMARS (High Mobility Artillery Rocket Systems) able to reach up to 400 kilometres.

This happened alongside the US and Singapore forces during training in Queensland last week.

"I think it's demonstrating our ability to modernise at speed," Brigadier Hill said.

"Our HIMARS arrived in Australia earlier this year and we've got proficient crews and capacities to live fire within months.

"I think that shows a little bit about how fast we're modernising."

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-07-22/rocket-launch-off-jervis-bay-talisman-sabre/105559398

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109391

File: d99e3f3fd1f3cc6⋯.jpg (899.28 KB,5000x3333,5000:3333,Clipboard.jpg)

File: a6728483b21d22f⋯.jpg (1.47 MB,5000x3336,625:417,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 160ea56a4e0baf8⋯.jpg (773.67 KB,1275x1650,17:22,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 359504ed4668791⋯.jpg (282.15 KB,1275x1650,17:22,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23367227 (230939ZJUL25) Notable: Scott Morrison to argue case for AUKUS before US Congress committee on China threats – Former Australian prime minister Scott Morrison will testify before the US House Select Committee on China as it urges Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth to support the under-review AUKUS pact. The review, led by Elbridge Colby, has raised concerns over US shipbuilding capacity. Bipartisan committee leaders said China’s expanding naval reach underscores the pact’s importance. Morrison, who launched AUKUS in 2021, has argued Trump will back it and urged expansion into space security. Washington wants Australia to lift defence spending to 3.5 per cent of GDP, a demand resisted by Anthony Albanese.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>73669 (pb)

>>109299

>>109372

Scott Morrison to argue case for AUKUS before US Congress committee on China threats

Brad Ryan - 23 July 2025

Former prime minister Scott Morrison is set to appear before a committee of the US Congress as its leaders lobby the White House to support the under-review AUKUS pact.

The select committee, which is examining threats posed by China, has written to US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth to push him to back the trilateral pact as the Pentagon considers its future.

The pact with the US and the UK, under which Australia would procure nuclear-powered submarines, is being reviewed to ensure it meets "common sense, America First criteria", according to the White House.

The Pentagon official leading the review, Elbridge Colby, has in the past expressed scepticism about AUKUS amid concerns about America's consistent failures to meet its own shipbuilding targets.

In their letter, the select committee's Republican chairman, John Moolenaar, and its most senior Democrat, Raja Krishnamoorthi, wrote that China's "rapid expansion of its nuclear, conventional, cyber, and space capabilities pose a grave concern for the United States and our like-minded allies and partners".

"AUKUS has received strong bipartisan support from Congress for a reason," they wrote. "We are stronger together under the AUKUS framework."

They pointed to the Chinese navy's deployment of aircraft carriers into the western Pacific in June, and its live-fire exercises in the Tasman Sea in February as troubling examples of Beijing "project[ing] blue-water capabilities at increasing distances from its shores".

"This attempt to project power as far south as New Zealand's front door highlights the importance of AUKUS in cementing ties to longstanding allies like Australia, as well as advancing vital undersea capabilities that will be central to deterrence," they wrote.

Mr Morrison, who announced the AUKUS pact with then-leaders Joe Biden and Boris Johnson in 2021, has previously spoken directly to Donald Trump about AUKUS. In June, he told the ABC he had "never had concerns" about the US president's commitment to the pact.

"I mean, there's a review underway, and I think he'll take notice of what Bridge Colby says, and I think we need to engage with that and make the case again," he said.

He later wrote a Wall Street Journal op-ed describing the review as a chance to "refocus and recalibrate" and advocating for AUKUS's expansion to outer-space security. "It's time for AUKUS to grow, and Mr Trump is the right person for the job," he wrote.

The Australian government has also expressed confidence in the pact's future, framing the review as a standard process for an incoming government and rejecting suggestions a "plan B" is needed.

But American concerns about Australia's defence budget remain a possible sticking point.

Mr Hegseth has urged Australia to lift defence spending to 3.5 per cent of GDP, from its current level of about 2 per cent. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has pushed back, saying Australia will determine its own defence priorities.

The opposition has been pressuring Mr Albanese to prioritise a meeting with Mr Trump to press the case for AUKUS. Plans for a meeting in May fell through.

Multiple congressional committee chairs have also recently written to Mr Hegseth in support of AUKUS, pointing to its benefits for the US, including a $4.5 billion Australian investment in America's submarine-building capabilities.

The Australian government made an initial payment of almost $800 million earlier this year. In total, the submarine deal is expected to cost Australia up to $368 billion over several decades.

Mr Morrison is one of two witnesses set to appear at Wednesday's committee hearing, which is focused on strategies to counter China's "economic coercion against democracies". The other is former US ambassador to Japan, Rahm Emanuel.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-07-23/scott-morrison-to-promote-aukus-to-us-congress-committee/105561962

https://selectcommitteeontheccp.house.gov/media/press-releases/strength-through-alliances-moolenaar-krishnamoorthi-reaffirm-aukus-support-amid-aggressive-ccp-military-threats

https://selectcommitteeontheccp.house.gov/sites/evo-subsites/selectcommitteeontheccp.house.gov/files/evo-media-document/aukus-letter-to-secretary-hegseth.pdf

https://www.congress.gov/event/119th-congress/house-event/118535

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109392

File: 9ec909a032e67cc⋯.jpg (1.68 MB,1815x1210,3:2,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 39b3516c25687fd⋯.jpg (867.57 KB,1867x1245,1867:1245,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23367236 (230952ZJUL25) Notable: Australia quietly pays US another $800 million for AUKUS despite review – Australia has quietly transferred another $800m to the United States for the AUKUS submarine deal, lifting its total contribution to $1.6bn, even as the Trump administration reviews the pact. The funding boosts US shipyard capacity to deliver Virginia-class submarines, with $2bn due by the end of 2025. Defence Minister Richard Marles said the payments follow a fixed schedule and reflect Canberra’s commitment to AUKUS. The unannounced transfer raised eyebrows, with speculation the US may seek further funds and press Australia to raise defence spending beyond 2 per cent of GDP.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109299

>>109316

>>109318

Australia quietly pays US another $800 million for AUKUS despite review

Michael Koziol - July 23, 2025

Washington: Australia has quietly paid the United States another $800 million towards the AUKUS submarine deal, taking the total to $1.6 billion, despite the Trump administration placing the agreement under a review.

This masthead confirmed the second payment was made in the second quarter of this year, per the agreed schedule. By the end of 2025, Canberra will have paid $US2 billion, or just over $3 billion, to the American shipbuilding industry to boost submarine production.

A Defence Department spokesperson said Australia had been clear since March 2023 that it would make a “proportionate contribution” to the American industrial base under the AUKUS agreement.

“Australia’s contribution is about accelerating US production rates and maintenance to enable the delivery of Australia’s future Virginia-class submarines,” the spokesperson said.

“The payments are occurring in line with Australia’s commitment to contribute US$2 billion by the end of 2025, which underscores our commitment to the successful delivery of AUKUS Pillar I outcomes.”

The government was unfazed by the Pentagon’s review of the AUKUS agreement and said it was natural that a new US administration would want to examine the progress of key initiatives.

“All three countries are continuing to progress the AUKUS pathway at pace, ensuring it meets national and trilateral objectives,” the Defence spokesperson said.

While Australia’s first $800 million payment was announced with fanfare in February, when Defence Minister Richard Marles met his US counterpart, Pete Hegseth, in Washington, the second payment was not announced.

However, in February, officials told a Senate estimates hearing the payment would proceed as per an agreed schedule – before the end of the 2024-25 financial year – and that $2 billion would be paid by the end of 2025.

The exact date of the second $800 million payment – and whether it occurred with knowledge of the US review – is unclear. The government confirmed the payment was made during the second quarter of this year, between April and June, but did not respond to further questions to clarify the date.

The Pentagon publicly confirmed the existence of the AUKUS review on June 11, and Marles has said the Australian government was informed of the review “weeks” before then. The government was in caretaker mode from March 28 until the May 3 election.

After this year, the remaining $US1 billion will be paid in regular annual instalments adjusted for inflation over 10 years. The $US3 billion ($5 billion) contribution to US submarine building represents a fraction of the $268-$368 billion price tag of AUKUS over 30 years.

Asked about this masthead’s story on Wednesday afternoon, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said the second payment was delivered according to the schedule.

“We have an agreement with the United States, as well as with the United Kingdom,” he told the ABC’s Afternoon Briefing.

“It’s about increasing their industrial capacity. But as part of that, we have Australians on the ground learning those skills, so that when it comes to the submarines being built here in Australia, we have those skills.

“It’s not extra, it’s a schedule that we have of a payment that we’re making. We support AUKUS, we have an agreement, it’s a treaty-level agreement.”

Bruce Wolpe, a senior fellow at the United States Studies Centre, said the payments made so far showed AUKUS was moving forward and nothing had changed despite the doubts that had erupted following the Pentagon’s review.

“There’s been no deviation on AUKUS from this government,” he said. “What this shows is a redoubling of the commitment. It’s in an orderly fashion.

“It’s kind of significant, though, that it has not been disclosed in a timely fashion ... everyone’s touchy about AUKUS and I guess they want to be more reticent than forthcoming.”

There is speculation the Pentagon review of AUKUS could ask for further contributions from Australia beyond the $US3 billion already pledged towards the US maritime industrial base. Hegseth has asked Australia to lift overall defence spending to 3.5 per cent of gross domestic product, from about 2 per cent – about an extra $40 billion a year.

The review is also considering whether the US can build enough submarines to fulfil its AUKUS commitments, and what undertakings Australia can give about how the boats will be used in the event of a conflict with China over Taiwan, or other contingencies.

https://www.theage.com.au/world/north-america/australia-quietly-pays-us-another-800-million-for-aukus-despite-review-20250723-p5mh8y.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109393

File: 8f5ab9514242d13⋯.jpg (21.14 KB,634x503,634:503,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 68155be0a32d81e⋯.jpg (718.04 KB,1920x1440,4:3,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 76577e4bdd75a7c⋯.jpg (1.16 MB,5000x3333,5000:3333,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23367241 (230959ZJUL25) Notable: All STD results negative in childcare screening so far, says Victorian minister – Victorian Deputy Premier Ben Carroll confirmed that all children tested for sexually transmitted diseases linked to accused childcare paedophile Joshua Dale Brown have so far returned negative results. Around 2,000 children are being screened after Brown, 26, was charged with more than 70 offences, including rape and producing child abuse material, allegedly committed at a Point Cook centre between 2022 and 2023. Carroll also defended current funding for the Commission for Children and Young People, despite reports of rising abuse complaints and warnings its oversight capacity is under strain.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109236

>>109238

All STD results negative in childcare screening so far, says Victorian minister

abc.net.au - 23 July 2025

All children tested so far for sexually transmitted diseases in relation to accused childcare paedophile Joshua Dale Brown have tested negative, the Victorian government says.

Deputy premier Ben Carroll provided an update on Wednesday morning on the testing exercise of about 2,000 children being undertaken as part of a police investigation into the alleged 26-year-old child abuser.

He said the latest advice came from his conversations with health authorities.

"From what we have advised, there is no child that has … tested [positive] for an STD."

"I think they've [hospital staff] tested just about everyone — but I can get that clarified — and all the tests have been negative."

Mr Brown is facing more than 70 charges, including rape of children, sexual activity in the presence of a child and contaminating food.

The charges, which were first made public on July 1, relate to eight children at Creative Garden Early Learning Centre in Point Cook between April 2022 and January 2023.

Out of caution, health authorities initially recommended STD screening for 1,200 children, taking in other centres where Brown has worked.

They then later recommended testing for another 800 children.

Mr Brown is expected to be hit with further criminal charges, following a brief court hearing on Tuesday during which his lawyer Rishi Nathwani KC said his client's charges were "in flux".

Charge sheets released by the Melbourne Magistrates' Court show Mr Brown faces 73 charges, including 28 of producing child abuse material, 24 of transmitting child abuse material, 13 of sexually touching a child under 16 and three of sexual penetration of a child under 12.

Carroll defends commission's funding levels

The deputy premier was also asked about funding for the Commission for Children and Young People, amid a sharp rise in the number of notifications about alleged abuse by workers or volunteers, including two complaints against Joshua Dale Brown.

Last week, the ABC revealed authorities were aware of investigations into Mr Brown's conduct in the two years before he was arrested for alleged child sexual abuse.

Mr Brown remained employed despite a finding he allegedly "aggressively" handled a child.

Mr Carroll defended the commission's current funding levels, despite reports to its Reportable Conduct Scheme being up 30 per cent in the year to 2023-24.

"Since about 2015, there's been about a 120 per cent increase in funding — around $14 million per year," he said.

"Having said that though, we can always do more. I know the role they play is critically important."

The commission's most recent annual report said its lack of funding meant it was forced to "significantly reduce" its oversight on a high number of investigations.

"With no additional funding for the scheme despite increased notifications, the commission has progressed a risk-based strategy to manage demand," the report said.

The state government is currently searching for a new commissioner to lead the organisation. The role was vacated in March, following the departure of Liana Buchanan.

"It needs to be filled with urgency," Mr Carroll said.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-07-23/std-testing-results-negative-melbourne-childcare-joshua-brown/105562872

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109394

File: 275cb1449e529c4⋯.jpg (148.05 KB,1080x1080,1:1,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 7ff3014206d4c53⋯.jpg (1.64 MB,2179x1453,2179:1453,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23367254 (231007ZJUL25) Notable: Police scour devices of man accused of East Melbourne Synagogue firebombing – Angelo Loras, 34, has been charged with arson, reckless conduct endangering life and criminal damage after allegedly firebombing the East Melbourne Synagogue on July 4 while 20 worshippers were inside. Police say he poured flammable liquid on the doors before setting them alight, causing $5000 damage. No injuries were reported. Two of Loras’ electronic devices are being examined to determine motive, which could escalate the case to a higher court if evidence is found. The incident is being investigated for potential terrorism links amid rising antisemitic acts in Melbourne.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109251

>>109263

>>109268

Police scour devices of man accused of East Melbourne Synagogue firebombing

Melissa Cunningham - July 22, 2025

Police are examining the electronic devices of a man accused of firebombing a Melbourne synagogue as they continue to hunt for a motive for the alleged attack, which occurred when 20 people were inside the building.

Angelo Loras, 34, faced Melbourne Magistrates’ Court on Tuesday after being charged over the alleged firebombing at an East Melbourne synagogue on July 4.

Charge sheet documents released by the Melbourne Magistrates’ Court allege Loras set the front doors of the East Melbourne Synagogue on fire, causing an estimated $5000 in damage.

He has been charged with committing arson, as well as possessing a control weapon, reckless conduct endangering life and criminal damage by fire.

Loras did not apply for bail and entered no plea at Tuesday’s hearing.

Police allege Loras was seen walking through Parliament Gardens in the moments before the fire, entering the grounds of the synagogue on Albert Street about 8pm on July 4.

He then allegedly poured flammable liquid on the front door of the religious building and set it alight before fleeing.

The NSW man, who appeared via video link from prison wearing a white T-shirt and sporting a beard and long, dark hair, remained expressionless throughout the brief hearing.

Police prosecutor Anthony Albore told the court two electronic devices had been seized by investigators and were being examined in a bid to determine a motive behind the alleged attack.

“If there is evidence obtained from those devices, that may establish a motive to this particular crime,” he said.

He said if a motive was discovered by police, there was a chance the case could go to trial in a higher court.

Loras’ lawyer asked the court to adjourn the matter to later this year and sought a sentence indication if his client was to plead guilty to the charges.

A police statement released at the time of the fire earlier this month said detectives would “continue to examine the intent and ideology of the person charged to determine if the incident is, in fact, terrorism”.

About 20 people, including children, were taking part in Shabbat inside the historic Albert Street synagogue when flammable liquid was poured on the front doors of the building, and they were set alight.

The congregants were able to evacuate the building, and no injuries were reported.

The alleged arson attack was the second on a Jewish place of worship in Melbourne since December, when a fire destroyed the Adass Israel Synagogue in Ripponlea in the city’s inner south-east.

It is also one of several alleged acts of antisemitism across the city, including a protest incident at CBD Israeli restaurant, Miznon, on July 5.

The incident followed a larger protest about the war in the Middle East involving about 70 people on Swanston Street earlier the same evening.

It is alleged about 20 people splintered off and went to the Hardware Lane restaurant where police said chairs were thrown, and a glass door was damaged.

Loras will next face the court on September 12.

https://www.theage.com.au/national/victoria/police-scour-devices-of-man-accused-of-east-melbourne-synagogue-firebombing-20250722-p5mgzt.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109395

File: 72f670495d8f36f⋯.jpg (99.1 KB,1200x720,5:3,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23367272 (231015ZJUL25) Notable: Australia knows its China relations well, doesn’t need outsiders peddling anxiety“Australia has a good grasp of its relationship with China and doesn't need outsiders peddling anxiety. Some Western politicians still believe that NATO's outdated playbook can work in the Asia-Pacific, even though the region has clearly moved on to a very different chapter. Here, people have long understood that conflict reflects the failure of diplomacy, while maintaining peace is the true sign of strength. Trying to fan the flames might stir up a little dust, but disrupting the region's deep-rooted aspirations for peace and prosperity? That's a much harder task.” – The Global Times

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109338

>>109224

>>109320

>>109383

Australia knows its China relations well, doesn’t need outsiders peddling anxiety

Global Times - Jul 22, 2025

Shortly after the Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese wrapped up a positive and productive visit to China, a Dutch general entered the public discourse, urging Australia to beware of China's military rise and to ramp up its defense spending. One can't help but wonder: Do some European officials truly believe they hold a remote control capable of steering the trajectory of Asia-Pacific affairs from halfway across the globe?

The Australian Broadcasting Corporation reported on Monday that General Onno Eichelsheim, the Netherlands' chief of defense, who was visiting Australia for the Talisman Sabre defense exercises, warned Australia about "the threat posed by China to the Indo-Pacific." "China is building up, take it seriously and get ready for something that you hope will never happen," he said, adding that "naivety" should not allow Australia and other countries to avoid preparing for the risk of conflict in the future.

What's puzzling is how a general, usually stationed more than 8,000 kilometers from China, managed to detect a "threat" so far away. While Europe grapples with crises on two fronts - the war in Ukraine and escalating tensions in the Middle East - this Dutch general has journeyed across continents to advise Australia on how to beef up military muscle against China. Funny how that works.

Some Western politicians seem quite skilled at turning a blind eye to the fact that the Asia-Pacific is currently one of the most stable and prosperous regions in the world - a status that didn't come easy. China as a major power has played a key role in maintaining this stability. The Asia-Pacific is also a major engine of the global economy, and at the heart of that engine lies China.

What's more, Australian Prime Minister Albanese recently wrapped up a visit to China, returning with a host of tangible cooperative achievements spanning trade, education, agriculture, tourism, and more. Chen Hong, director of Australian Studies Centre, East China Normal University, summed up this visit with three keywords in an interview with the Global Times: "stable," "new," and "progressive."

Chen said that "stable" refers to the overall steady state of China-Australia relations; "new" highlights the joint efforts to break new ground in emerging fields like the green economy and green iron; and "progressive" signifies a step forward on existing foundations. For instance, the visit's inclusion of diverse cities like Chengdu showcases Australia's intention to engage with China from a broader and more open perspective.

At a time like this, amplifying the "China threat" and stirring the pot in China-Australia relations feels ill-timed. Whether these remarks aim to signal loyalty to the US or NATO, or simply to grab attention for personal fame, they reveal a deeper issue: Some people just don't want to see stability in the Asia-Pacific, a positive thaw in China-Australia ties, or regional cooperation and peace.

But Australia has already spoken for itself. During his visit to China, Albanese stated that Australia values its relations with China; that China's development is vital to Australia; and that the relationship in China means jobs in Australia, it's as simple as that. On the military spending question, Australian Defense Minister Richard Marles made it clear that "ultimately every country, when it goes through its own processes about what kind of defense force it needs to build, does so based on assessing its own strategic need."

Australia has a good grasp of its relationship with China and doesn't need outsiders peddling anxiety. Some Western politicians still believe that NATO's outdated playbook can work in the Asia-Pacific, even though the region has clearly moved on to a very different chapter. Here, people have long understood that conflict reflects the failure of diplomacy, while maintaining peace is the true sign of strength. Trying to fan the flames might stir up a little dust, but disrupting the region's deep-rooted aspirations for peace and prosperity? That's a much harder task.

https://www.globaltimes.cn/page/202507/1338995.shtml

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109396

File: e7108fb6351497d⋯.jpg (186.75 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: f60eb93497bfcb0⋯.jpg (147.85 KB,1279x719,1279:719,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23372968 (240958ZJUL25) Notable: Scott Morrison issues new Beijing warning after Andrew Forrest says suspicion of Xi Jinping’s China now a thing of the past – Scott Morrison and Andrew Forrest have clashed over China, with Morrison criticizing Forrest’s praise of Prime Minister Albanese's approach. Forrest claims that Albanese’s government has replaced suspicion with respect in Sino-Australian relations, particularly after the PM’s meeting with Xi Jinping. Morrison, however, warned that China still poses a significant strategic threat. Forrest emphasized China's commitment to green energy and iron, urging greater Australian support. Morrison cautioned against Beijing's charm offensive and its efforts to isolate Australia from its allies. Forrest remains hopeful about a respectful partnership, contrasting his stance with Morrison’s tougher position.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109337

>>109372

>>109391

Scott Morrison issues new Beijing warning after Andrew Forrest says suspicion of Xi Jinping’s China now a thing of the past

PAUL GARVEY and JOE KELLY - 24 July 2025

1/2

Scott Morrison and billionaire Andrew Forrest have engaged in a stunning war of words over China, with the former prime minister saying the Chinese Communist Party will be pleased with the Fortescue chairman’s attacks on his Liberal government’s handling of Beijing.

Dr Forrest writes in The Australian on Thursday that Anthony Albanese is showing the world that it no longer needs to be suspicious of Xi Jinping’s regime, and that Australia and China as friends can teach US President Donald Trump that “respect triumphs over fear.”

As well as effusively praising the Prime Minister and Labor over the China reset, Dr Forrest accused the Morrison government solely for the deterioration of relations with China during the Covid-19 pandemic.

“China has not just been a partner to me personally, but to the company I founded, Fortescue, and to Australia as a whole,” Dr Forrest writes.

“Three of Australia’s top five taxpayers are iron ore majors. Yet, for reasons that had little to do with facts and everything to do with politics, an Australian government chose to sow fear over fostering respect.

“Fast forward to last week and it’s remarkable how far our bilateral relationship has come in such a short space of time.

“When Anthony Albanese sat down with Xi Jinping, we saw something we haven’t seen for years: two leaders talking as equals, with mutual ­respect.”

Just before the former PM appeared before a US Congressional panel probing the CCP where he warned that Australians risked being “asleep” to the strategic threat from Beijing, Mr Morrison hit back at Dr Forrest.

“I’m sure Dr Forrest’s comments would have been well received by the CCP in Beijing,” he said on Capitol Hill on Thursday.

During Mr Albanese’s China visit, Mr Morrison warned that China was “charming and flattering” his successor in an effort to isolate Australia from the US.

Morrison issues China warning

Addressing the hearing, Mr Morrison warned that China’s objective was the “subordination of a rule of law based on universal human rights to one arbitrarily defined by the state and to draw an equivalence between their regimes and freedom-based societies”.

“This will not change. Nor can it be negotiated away,” he said. “Rather than opening up their society, during post-cold war globalisation the CCP used China’s newly granted access to global trade, capital markets and legitimacy in international forums to build the economic, diplomatic, technological and military capacity to one day challenge the global order in an attempt to make it more favourable to their regime security. That day is now.”

Mr Morrison said he was “pleased that our government provided the example of resistance and resilience” by standing firm against Beijing’s coercion “rather than acquiescence and appeasement”.

“Throughout this period, we moved to work with our allies and partners in the region to deepen our ties and strengthen our co-operation,” he said.

Mr Morrison also sounded the alarm on the recent change in tactics from Beijing.

“The PRC took advantage of the change in government following the 2022 federal election to effect a reset and adopt a different tactics,” he said.

“This included abandoning their economic and diplomatic bullying and coercion for more inductive engagement, laced with charm and flattery.

“That said, the PRC still continues to engage in intimidatory behaviour by their military against Australia when it suits them without remorse.”

Dr Forrest is ­effusive in his praise for Mr Albanese’s efforts to improve ties with the nation’s biggest trading partner amid tensions between the Trump administration and Beijing over tariffs and defence

He writes that Mr Albanese had shown the right way to build respect and ties with China, and understood that the relationship between Beijing and Canberra could not return to “old ways of suspicion and division”.

“It is time for Australia and China to show the world – particularly my friends in North America – what is possible when respect triumphs over fear, and when ambition for a world no longer reliant on fossil fuels triumphs over complacency,” he said.

“We must choose a clean, pollution free, peaceful world, where energy can no longer be weaponised. We owe it to the next century to get this right.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109397

File: 9fb9b6f32218220⋯.jpg (431.82 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 497650901ebd0d6⋯.jpg (179.71 KB,2047x1152,2047:1152,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23372994 (241008ZJUL25) Notable: OPINION: We’ve vilified China as an ‘enemy’; Anthony Albanese is right to make friends"Ever since I was at school, I have found that if you treat someone like an enemy for long enough, eventually they will become one. Human nature is such that if you box someone in, back them into a corner and paint them as a threat, sooner or later they will see themselves that way too. As I watched Australia’s relationship with China deteriorate to the terrible lows of five years ago, this was one of my greatest fears. China has not just been a partner to me personally, but to the company I founded, Fortescue, and to Australia as a whole. It is time for Australia and China to show the world what is possible when respect triumphs over fear." – Andrew Forrest, The Australian

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109321

>>109337

>>109396

OPINION: We’ve vilified China as an ‘enemy’; Anthony Albanese is right to make friends

ANDREW FORREST - 24 July 2025

1/2

Ever since I was at school, I have found that if you treat someone like an enemy for long enough, eventually they will become one.

Human nature is such that if you box someone in, back them into a corner and paint them as a threat, sooner or later they will see themselves that way too.

As I watched Australia’s relationship with China deteriorate to the terrible lows of five years ago, this was one of my greatest fears. Here was a country that I had been coming to for 36 years – a country where I have made lifelong friends, done business in good faith, and seen incredible economic transformation for both the benefit of Australia and China.

China has not just been a partner to me personally, but to the company I founded, Fortescue, and to Australia as a whole. Three of Australia’s top five taxpayers are iron ore majors. Yet, for reasons that had little to do with facts and everything to do with politics, an Australian government chose to sow fear over fostering respect.

Iron ore – a $138bn industry supporting more than 60,000 full-time jobs – was untouched, showing how deep the economic ties still run. But sectors such as wine, barley, beef and seafood were hit hard.

Fast forward to last week and it’s remarkable how far our bilateral relationship has come in such a short space of time. When Anthony Albanese sat down with Xi Jinping, we saw something we haven’t seen for years: two leaders talking as equals, with mutual ­respect.

The bond that helped transform China into the modern, dynamic, fast-moving place it is today, while delivering Australia an unparalleled economic windfall, was back. And it was wonderful to see. I congratulate the Prime Minister for his deliberate, rational and values-based leadership. He gets it – he understands China and how to build partnerships. Today that is more important than ever.

While the prosperity of modern Australia has been deeply tied to China’s remarkable growth, what comes next will matter even more. It is why the renewed trust that I witnessed matters.

The next chapter in the Australia-China relationship will define our shared futures for the next century. It was significant that one of the defining moments of the Prime Minister’s visit was one I had not experienced on the more than 50 occasions I have been to China: the leaders of our respective countries, the leaders of Australia’s largest iron ore miners, and the leaders of China’s biggest steelmakers, together in one room.

Most of those in that room for the steel decarbonisation roundtable – those with their heart truly set on building a future for Australia and China, together – could see what green iron and green steel could deliver.

They knew, like me, there wasn’t a snowflake’s chance in hell that China wouldn’t send its cities green and its skies blue, and that Australia was in the box seat to ­enable it to do so.

Those who didn’t have their hearts in it exposed themselves, and that’s OK. For more than two decades Fortescue has put its head above the parapet on issues we believe are critical to the future of our company and our country, and that will never change.

What is clear is that both the Australian and the Chinese governments are taking this very ­seriously. The establishment of a new ­Policy Dialogue on Steel ­Decarbonisation shows a welcome determination to take this forward.

This is not a pipe dream. As Ross Garnaut, an economic adviser to former prime minister Bob Hawke, told The Sydney Morning Herald, Albanese’s trip was “as important as Bob Hawke’s trip to China in 1984 that set up the iron ore trade – it’s the future of the Australian economy”.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109398

File: ac7818034349c9f⋯.jpg (1.01 MB,4240x2384,265:149,Clipboard.jpg)

File: bd2b5c608e37df9⋯.jpg (576.37 KB,1241x1755,1241:1755,Clipboard.jpg)

File: c83b95c86dca6be⋯.jpg (699.34 KB,1241x1755,1241:1755,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 40dac08d0b26a10⋯.jpg (441.13 KB,1241x1755,1241:1755,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23373015 (241025ZJUL25) Notable: China punished Australia's loyalty to America, Scott Morrison tells US Congress committee – Scott Morrison has appeared before a committee of the US Congress to implore America to "never become casual" about the economic threats posed by China and its willingness to weaponise trade. Pointing to China's "targeted and illegal trade bans and diplomatic estrangement" when he was prime minister, Morrison said Australia had been punished for its loyalty to the US and now had many lessons to offer. He emphasized the importance of strengthening US alliances to better ward off any threat from China, highlighting Australia's own response as a model for others.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109299

>>109337

>>109396

China punished Australia's loyalty to America, Scott Morrison tells US Congress committee

Brad Ryan - 24 July 2025

1/2

Scott Morrison has appeared before a committee of the US Congress to implore America to "never become casual" about the economic threats posed by China and its willingness to weaponise trade.

Pointing to China's "targeted and illegal trade bans and diplomatic estrangement" when he was prime minister, Mr Morrison said Australia had been punished for its loyalty to the US and now had many lessons to offer the Americans.

And — without explicitly mentioning the up-ending of trade relationships caused by the Trump administration's tariffs program, or its AUKUS review — he argued for tighter ties between Australia, the US and like-minded democracies to better ward off any threat.

"Above all, I would highlight the need to never become casual about the potential threat and to remain vigilant," he told the Select Committee on the Chinese Communist Party (CCP).

"Strengthening and deepening the networks of US alliances and partners is critical to resilience and deterrence. This is as true in the economic sphere as it is in the security sphere."

Mr Morrison was invited to testify before the bipartisan committee, which was formed in 2023 to assess the CCP threat and "develop a plan of action to defend the American people".

Since its formation, it has been sounding alarms on America's economic dependence on China, particularly for mineral exports such as the rare earths widely used in modern technology.

"China can so much as flick a switch and cause major damage to the American economy," the committee's top Democrat, Raja Krishnamoorthi, said.

'Charm and flattery' from the CCP

Mr Morrison told the committee China changed tactics after Australia's 2022 election, when the Labor Party defeated the incumbent Coalition.

The CCP was now using "inductive engagement laced with charm and flattery" to try to manipulate Australia and isolate the US in the region.

He said diplomacy with China would never lead to effective solutions.

"We have to be clear-eyed about this and not pretend that somehow this is going to be resolved through discussion," Mr Morrison said.

The committee's other witness, former US ambassador to Japan Rahm Emanuel, said: "Australia's response to China's coercion is the best example to try to replicate going forward."

He argued America and its allies should form a new "anti-coercion coalition" with the "economic equivalent" of NATO's Article 5 clause, which states that an "attack on one is an attack on all".

But he warned America's current trade policies meant it risked motivating a similarly united retaliatory response from its partners.

While President Donald Trump's "reciprocal tariffs" remain on pause, he has this month written to scores of foreign leaders warning that punishing tariffs will be imposed soon.

Mr Emanuel pointed to action taken by the EU after China imposed trade restrictions on Lithuania over the Baltic state's Taiwan policy.

"The only time they've thought of deploying that unity now was with the United States because of how we're negotiating with the EU," he said.

"So it was designed with China in mind, but … now may be deployed with us."

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109399

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23373022 (241030ZJUL25) Notable: Video: Australians ‘going to sleep’ on China threat, Morrison tells US Congress – Scott Morrison has warned the US Congress that Australians are at risk of "going to sleep" on the security threat posed by China, citing polling from the Lowy Institute that shows Australians' shifting perception of China, with 50% seeing it as an economic partner and 47% as a security threat. He stressed that Western democracies must be willing to endure economic pain to stand up to Beijing. Morrison defended his government's stance against China's coercion and warned that discussions with Beijing were unlikely to change its objectives. He emphasized the need for vigilance and resilience in the face of China's influence.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109337

>>109398

Australians ‘going to sleep’ on China threat, Morrison tells US Congress

Michael Koziol - July 24, 2025

Washington: Former prime minister Scott Morrison has told the United States Congress that Australians are at risk of “going to sleep” on the security threat posed by China, and warned the US and its allies they must be prepared to wear economic pain to stand up to Beijing.

Appearing before a congressional hearing on the Chinese Communist Party, Morrison cited polling by the Lowy Institute that showed, in 2025, 50 per cent of Australians said China was “more of an economic partner to Australia”, whereas 47 per cent said it was “more of a security threat”.

That had changed significantly from 2021-22, a time of strained relations between Canberra and Beijing, when 63 per cent said China was more of a security threat and 33 per cent said it was more of an economic partner.

“That is an objective of the CCP – that Western democracies will go to sleep on the threat,” Morrison told the hearing.

“You need to build the internal resilience, and that means an appreciation of the potential threat. And that is somewhat in jeopardy in Australia.”

Later, he told reporters that Australians’ level of awareness of the security threat posed by China had clearly diminished significantly over the past three years.

Morrison, whose call for an inquiry into the origins of COVID-19 roiled Beijing, told US lawmakers that China had chosen to make an example of Australia as a key US ally – “to punish Australia as a warning to others”.

He said he was proud that his government had resisted this pressure “by standing firm, rather than acquiescence and appeasement”, and encouraged other leaders to do the same.

“There are many lessons from our experience,” Morrison said. “Above all, I would highlight the need to never become casual about the potential threat, and to remain vigilant.

“Discussion is fine, engagement is good, it’s better than the alternative. But if we think that is going to produce a change in the mindset in Beijing about what the objectives are, then we’re frankly kidding ourselves.”

Morrison gave the Albanese government no credit for improving relations, arguing instead that Beijing took advantage of the change in government in 2022 to reset its failing coercive tactics.

“This included abandoning their economic and diplomatic bullying for more inductive engagement, laced with charm and flattery,” he told the hearing.

Australia’s relations with China have thawed under Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and Beijing has ended its trade bans. Albanese just returned from a six-day visit that included a meeting with President Xi Jinping.

Morrison told reporters that the relationship with China – Australia’s largest trading partner – deteriorated on his watch “because of the actions of China, not the actions of Australia”.

“You don’t thank someone for stopping punching you in the face,” he said.

The former prime minister warned lawmakers that standing up to the CCP came at an economic cost.

He said he was encouraged by letters he had received from Australian farmers hit by China’s trade bans – on products such as barley, beef and wine – who told him he was doing the right thing, despite the hurt.

“If you’re going to stand up here, you’ve got to be prepared to take a few hits in the process,” he said. “But you’re much more able to do that if you can take hits with your mates, and your mates have got to show up as well.”

It is rare for former government leaders to provide evidence to a congressional inquiry. Morrison said he was appearing in a personal capacity.

Since leaving office, he has joined defence advisory firm American Global Strategies as non-executive vice chairman, and he chairs the advisory board of Space Centre Australia.

https://www.smh.com.au/world/north-america/australians-going-to-sleep-on-china-threat-morrison-tells-us-congress-20250724-p5mhdd.html

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QutGLTXhNLU

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109400

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23373031 (241039ZJUL25) Notable: Video: Turn AUKUS shipyard into joint naval base with the US, Morrison urges – Scott Morrison has suggested that a planned AUKUS shipbuilding facility in Western Australia should become a joint base with the US to address the Trump administration's concerns about the submarine deal. The proposal would allow the upgraded facility at Henderson to host and repair both Australian and US submarines, providing the US direct access to the Indian Ocean. Morrison emphasized the importance of maintaining US capabilities and suggested that Australia's Henderson yard could play a significant role in enhancing US submarine production and maintenance. He also downplayed concerns about the Pentagon’s AUKUS review, asserting that operational planning was crucial.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109299

>>109337

>>109398

Turn AUKUS shipyard into joint naval base with the US, Morrison urges

Michael Koziol - July 24, 2025

1/2

Washington: Scott Morrison says a planned AUKUS shipbuilding facility in Western Australia should become a joint base with the US to help address the Trump administration’s “legitimate issues” with the submarine deal he designed and announced as prime minister in 2021.

The controversial idea, with advocates in both Canberra and Washington, would allow the upgraded facility at Henderson, south of Perth, to host and repair American submarines, not just Australian ones, and give the US direct access to the Indian Ocean, a strategic asset.

As the Pentagon reviews the AUKUS agreement to see if it fits with President Donald Trump’s “America First” agenda, one of the key issues is whether the US can part with the three nuclear-powered submarines Australia is due to buy.

The slow rate of production is a problem, as is a severe maintenance backlog. Australia has paid $US1 billion (about $1. 6 billion) to the US maritime industrial base so far, with another $US1 billion due by year’s end.

Morrison - who now provides strategic advice for corporations, including defence industry clients - said the US appreciated and valued AUKUS, “but that doesn’t mean there aren’t issues”.

“The issues that [US defence undersecretary] Elbridge Colby has been raising, he’s been raising those for years, and they’re legitimate issues, and they go to the US’s capability to produce submarines,” he said.

“There are many ways you can get more subs out at sea, and it’s not just about how quickly you build them; it’s also how you maintain them. Australia, through Henderson, has a real opportunity to add to that.”

Asked if he meant maintaining US boats at the facility, he said yes. “That would significantly add to the capability of the US to do what it needs to do.”

Morrison made the remarks while speaking to reporters in Washington after appearing before a congressional committee on the Chinese Communist Party.

‘I know they value AUKUS’

Asked if he believed the Trump administration would go ahead with the deal, Morrison said: “I think they’ll complete their review. I know they value AUKUS ... There are many ways to address the issues that are being highlighted in this review, and it would be a mistake for us to think they’re not real issues.”

Australia must build the Henderson yard to service its own needs under AUKUS. Former home affairs secretary Mike Pezzullo has also advocated making it a joint base, arguing it could be “at least as significant” as the Pine Gap satellite surveillance station near Alice Springs.

“The US would have to pay for only labour and material costs for maintaining its own boats, taking advantage of Australia’s capital investment in Henderson for free,” he wrote in a piece for the Australian Strategic Policy Institute in May.

Pezzullo, who was removed by the Albanese government in 2023 over his attempts to influence the previous Coalition government, said Australia would have to blitz through planning and construction to have two dry docks ready by 2032. In return, it could lock in the three submarines by negotiating a treaty with Trump.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109401

File: 5ae7f12342ce6d9⋯.jpg (165.55 KB,1280x720,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 3128e30eaad01a7⋯.jpg (533.28 KB,2048x1536,4:3,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23383417 (260949ZJUL25) Notable: COMMENTARY: In a new cold war, Albanese and Forrest should choose their sides carefully"Whether the Fortescue executive chairman believes China’s propaganda or simply mouths it, Andrew Forrest’s upbeat take on Beijing’s ‘beautiful evolution’ is, in truth, the entry price into the court of Xi Jinping. Forrest claims Anthony Albanese has overcome these mistakes because “he understands China and how to build partnerships”. Now, Australia and China must together teach 'friends in North America what is possible when respect triumphs over fear'.” Forrest fails to address any negative aspect of China’s behaviour towards Australia in the past few years… He appears to take no position on Beijing’s persecution of ethnic and religious minorities..." – Peter Jennings, The Australian

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109337

>>109396

>>109397

COMMENTARY: In a new cold war, Albanese and Forrest should choose their sides carefully

Whether the Fortescue executive chairman believes China’s propaganda or simply mouths it, Andrew Forrest’s upbeat take on Beijing’s ‘beautiful evolution’ is, in truth, the entry price into the court of Xi Jinping.

PETER JENNINGS - July 25, 2025

1/3

In a remarkable column in The Australian on Thursday, Fortescue executive chairman and founder Andrew Forrest claimed that past Australian governments had treated China as an enemy and “chose to sow fear over fostering respect”.

Forrest claims Anthony Albanese has overcome these mistakes because “he understands China and how to build partnerships”. Now, Australia and China must together teach “friends in North America what is possible when respect triumphs over fear”.

On Friday Australia signed a 50-year AUKUS agreement with our friends in the UK. This is a big step forward in practical defence cooperation, a far cry from Beijing’s banquets and panda theatre. Forrest is completely tone deaf to the geopolitical shifts which make China more of a risk than an opportunity.

Four concerns stand out to me in this astonishing misrepresentation of China’s intent and Australia’s behaviour during the past decade.

My first concern is that Forrest is never shy to talk up his own book. He and other “iron ore majors” are big taxpayers, he tells us – so we had better listen.

He has made “lifelong friends” and operated “in good faith” in China; he has witnessed the “beautiful evolution” of China’s modernisation.

What Forrest doesn’t mention is the extensive public funding his ventures have received from Australian state and federal governments to promote renewable energy projects, the Gladstone hydrogen plant and, perhaps less environmentally sound but a nice little earner anyway, diesel fuel subsidies.

It is expected that Fortescue will be a major beneficiary from the $1 billion that the Albanese government splurged last February to create a fund supporting the manufacture of green iron and its supply chains.

Forrest wants “governments willing to back ambition with policy certainty”. To be clear, it’s his ambition that must be backed and “policy certainty” means public support to achieve his private sector goals.

“We owe it to the next century to get this right.” That means a China that wants Fortescue products and an Australia that will help Forrest make “big bets on the future”.

It is a remarkable testimony to Forrest’s drive and personal confidence that he sees no gap between his personal interest and Australia’s national interest. Indeed, an Australian government not aligned to this aim is one that will “drift back into the old ways of suspicion and division”. He has seen the future. To echo Louis XIV: “The future, it is me.”

My second concern about Forrest’s article is the astonishing way in which it fails to address any negative aspect of China’s behaviour towards Australia in the past few years. In fact, the article says, “for reasons that had little to do with facts and everything to do with politics” previous Australian governments had damaged the relationship.

This mirrors the Chinese Communist Party’s longstanding line that any damage to the relationship is Australia’s fault.

In fact, Forrest’s opening line is “if you treat someone like an enemy for long enough, eventually they will become one”. This echoes the charge made by a Chinese embassy official in 2020 when handing to journalists the notorious 14-point “grievance list” about Australian bad behaviour: “China is angry. If you make China the enemy, China will be the enemy.”

This newspaper has reported on Forrest’s past reluctance to discuss uncomfortable aspects of Chinese behaviour. Despite leading a global campaign against modern slavery in July 2019, Forrest said he didn’t have enough information about China’s treatment of Uighurs to offer clear comment: “I’m not close enough to make an authoritative statement on any country but I can firmly say that every country has modern slavery.”

Forrest claims to have made more than 50 visits to China. None gave him an insight into the internationally recognised situation of the Uighurs. China is one of the worst abusers of modern slavery, including of people forced to make items imported into Australia.

In Australia, but not in China, the Fortescue executive chairman can write and say whatever he wants about “facts” without consequence.

He appears to take no position on Beijing’s persecution of ethnic and religious minorities; the suppression of political dissent and the arrest and disappearance of regime opponents; the use of propaganda and indoctrination to brainwash the population and surveillance technology to control them.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109402

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23383513 (261034ZJUL25) Notable: China diplomat grills mayor over AUKUS submarine location – A Chinese diplomat, Wang Yu, used a private meeting with Newcastle’s Lord Mayor Ross Kerridge to probe whether the city’s port could serve as a base for AUKUS nuclear submarines. Wang raised concerns that Australia’s strategic defence decisions could affect Chinese interests and urged Newcastle to maintain good relations with China. Despite this, Kerridge downplayed the discussion, stating the conversation was diplomatic and “routine.” He noted that Newcastle’s nuclear-free policy would make it unlikely to host a submarine base, and the decision would ultimately be made by higher levels of government.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109299

>>109316

>>109318

China diplomat grills mayor over AUKUS submarine location

A top Chinese diplomat used a private meeting to grill Newcastle’s mayor about the future location of AUKUS nuclear submarines, raising serious security concerns. Now the Lord Mayor has spoken out.

Lachlan Leeming - July 24, 2025

1/2

A top Chinese diplomat has used a closed-doors meeting with a local mayor to probe for information about where AUKUS nuclear submarines will be docked, in a move the federal Opposition says should “ring alarm bells at the highest levels of government”.

Wang Yu, the Consul General of China in Sydney, also warned Newcastle City Lord Mayor Ross Kerridge that Australia shouldn’t use “relations with other countries to adversely affect China”, according to minutes of the intimate meeting, obtained by The Daily Telegraph.

The document shows the sit-down was requested by Mr Wang and held last Thursday in the council’s office, during Prime Minister Anthony Albanese’s six-day visit to China.

Notes taken during the meeting reveal the Consul General’s (CG) probing for defence details, including whether submarines obtained under the AUKUS deal would be docked in Newcastle, which has the east coast’s largest port.

“CG explained that China is concerned that Chinese interests in Australia will be affected by strategic defence decisions,” the minutes read.

“For example, is Newcastle Port a potential base for AUKUS submarines?

“(The Lord Mayor) explained that we are a nuclear free city but we will not have the means to stop a decision of this nature taken by the state and/or federal governments.”

“China expects that Australia and Newcastle will have good relations with other countries and is also looking to build good relations but would not like us … to use our good relations with other countries to adversely affect China.”

The Lord Mayor of Newcastle has since spoken out, defending the meeting as routine and warning against “sensational comments” made by critics.

He also attached a photo of Chinese President Xi Jinping and Prime Minister Anthony Albanese shaking hands underneath his post, highlighting his call for diplomacy.

Mr Wang also asked about Newcastle’s Tibetan and Taiwanese communities, before telling the Lord Mayor China is “against any kind of support” for either country.

“The CG explained China’s position on official engagements with Taiwan and Tibet. China is against any kind of support for Taiwan or Tibet which includes engagements by local officials. China will not compromise on this issue,” the document states.

In response to questions from The Telegraph, the Consulate General of China in Sydney’s office did not answer why AUKUS was discussed, saying: “It is our responsibility to engage and exchange views with all institutions and local governments in NSW for bilateral relations”.

A spokesman for the Lord Mayor said the sit-down was a “meet and greet and to talk about Sister City relationships”.

“The China Consul General had never been to Newcastle before and wanted to introduce himself. The Consul General is new in the role. The Consul General met with other stakeholders in Newcastle,” he said.

He confirmed no advice was sought from the Department of Foreign Affairs or other government officials on the meeting, saying the Lord Mayor’s role “is to represent the Council at intergovernmental forums at regional, state and Commonwealth level”.

He said “no other discussion about AUKUS was entered into”.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109403

File: 4fd607335f6022e⋯.jpg (235.13 KB,2047x1152,2047:1152,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 98d89dd74644da9⋯.jpg (238.22 KB,1920x1079,1920:1079,Clipboard.jpg)

File: ff1a97401daac8f⋯.jpg (974.12 KB,895x1840,179:368,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23383565 (261057ZJUL25) Notable: Sub plot forces action: Canberra calls Beijing after secret submarine meeting with Newcastle mayor – The Australian government has raised concerns with Beijing following a secret meeting between Chinese Consul General Wang Yu and Newcastle Lord Mayor Ross Kerridge, where the diplomat asked about the potential location of AUKUS nuclear submarines. The conversation, revealed in meeting minutes, raised alarms, with opposition figures accusing the government of turning a blind eye to China's actions. The Australian government reiterated that national decisions on AUKUS would be made at the federal level, while local officials questioned the lack of transparency regarding the meeting's agenda.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109299

>>109316

>>109402

Sub plot forces action: Canberra calls Beijing after secret submarine meeting with Newcastle mayor

A closed-door meeting between a Chinese diplomat and a NSW mayor has been noticed by the Australian government.

Lachlan Leeming - July 24, 2025

Comments made in a meeting between a top Chinese diplomat and a NSW mayor have been escalated to Beijing, after the diplomat asked questions about the future location of AUKUS nuclear submarines in a closed-door sit-down.

The Daily Telegraph understands the Australian Government has raised concerns over the comments with its Chinese counterparts, following last week’s meeting between China’s consul general in Sydney Wang Yu and Newcastle Lord Mayor Ross Kerridge.

Minutes of the meeting, obtained by The Daily Telegraph, revealed Mr Kerridge was asked if Newcastle’s port would be used to dock AUKUS submarines in the future.

The Opposition accused the government of “turning a blind eye to disturbing behaviour from China” after the sit-down was revealed.

“The Prime Minister must clarify whether he thinks this conduct aligns with what he describes as a respectful relationship between Australia and China,” Coalition home affairs spokesman Andrew Hastie said.

The Telegraph asked the offices of Prime Minister Anthony Albanese, Foreign Affairs Minister Penny Wong and Defence Minister Richard Marles whether they were aware of other similar approaches from Chinese diplomats to officials at local and state government levels.

A spokeswoman for assistant foreign Minister Matt Thistlewaite responded, saying “China has made no secret of its views about AUKUS”.

“Australia makes our decisions in our national interest – and it will be the Australian federal government that is responsible for our policies,” she said.

Newcastle’s deputy Lord Mayor Callum Pull on Thursday highlighted the Lord Mayor could know sensitive information, after meetings in the last year with Kongsberg Defence Australia, Defence Industry Minister Pat Conroy and the Hunter Defence Task Force.

“I and other Councillors have questioned why we were not informed of, or invited to the meeting, and why the meeting occurred with apparently no agenda, stated intent or clear purpose,” Mr Pull said.

Mr Kerridge on Wednesday night posted a lengthy post on social media about the meeting, including a photo of Mr Albanese and Chinese president Xi Jinping shaking hands.

“He did explain that a submarine base in Newcastle would make China less interested in investing in the area,” Mr Kerridge wrote of the meeting with Mr Wang.

“It sounds very dramatic saying that these things were discussed, but I felt that these are topics that they have to introduce in order to state the Chinese government positions. I just politely noted his comments.”

Coalition defence spokesman Angus Taylor said “reports … officials from foreign governments are suggesting there would be economic retaliation against local councils over this decision are highly concerning and must be immediately investigated by the Minister for Defence”.

Strategic Analysis Australia director Michael Shoebridge said it was “startling to have a Chinese government official be so openly … focused on national security issues like where a submarine base will be in Australia, while the PM was on his extended friendship tour of China”.

“It shows the Chinese government can walk and chew gum – they can flatter our PM and business leaders … while pursuing Beijing security interests at exactly the same time,” he said.

“We need to understand both sides of China, and not just happy pandas and iron ore sales.”

Ms Wong and Mr Marles on Friday will meet with their British counterparts for a series of defence-focused meetings.

https://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/news/nsw/sub-plot-forces-action-canberra-calls-beijing-after-secret-submarine-meeting-with-newcastle-mayor/news-story/735e45a19a9d35d9911ef1f07686ff28

https://www.facebook.com/drrosskerridge/posts/122168919884445318

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109404

File: be1e9909949c7f1⋯.jpg (2.39 MB,6000x4000,3:2,Clipboard.jpg)

File: d80e53400261c86⋯.jpg (2.85 MB,5472x3648,3:2,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23383607 (261117ZJUL25) Notable: The warning sign about Chinese steel before Kew pool roof collapse – Lab testing revealed "inconsistencies" in the Chinese steel used to support the roof of the $73 million Kew Recreation Centre, which collapsed in October 2022, the Melbourne Magistrates’ Court has heard. The steel was found to have insufficient yield stress, tensile strength, and excessive aluminium. Procurement manager Richard Zhang told the court that concerns over the steel's quality were raised before the collapse, but he did not follow up on the issues due to time pressures. The Victorian Building Authority has charged ADCO Group following a two-year investigation into the collapse.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109325

>>109326

>>109337

The warning sign about Chinese steel before Kew pool roof collapse

Grant McArthur - July 23, 2025

Lab testing detected “inconsistencies” in the Chinese steel used to support the roof of a $73 million Melbourne public pool before it caved in during a construction collapse, a court has heard.

A court heard imported steel used by construction company ADCO to build the Kew Recreation Centre was found to have a range of issues, including insufficient yield stress, tensile strength and excessive aluminium.

The company’s procurement manager, responsible for sourcing the steel, told the Melbourne Magistrates’ Court that late changes to some aspects of the plans were also not resubmitted for approval as it would have caused a “big financial and time impact” for its client, the City of Boroondara.

The roof of the $73 million Kew Recreation Centre redevelopment on High Street caved in at 10pm on October 20, 2022, causing a deafening bang locals likened to an explosion.

Twisted metal members, which had been holding up the roof, fell from both sides.

The Victorian Building Authority (VBA) has filed 18 charges against ADCO Group and its director John Conroy following a two-year investigation into the major construction collapse.

After ADCO’s procurement manager Richard Zhang failed to provide a witness statement, the VBA applied to the court to conduct a compulsory examination of him.

Under cross-examination from VBA counsel Chris Carr, KC, on Wednesday, Zhang said senior external engineers had raised concerns about the accuracy of mill certificates for imported steel they had used on previous projects and, as a result, agreed the material for the Kew pool would need to be independently tested by Australian labs.

He said the testing was undertaken when the steel arrived in Australia after his role on the project had finished, though he was still included in email chains that raised concerns about the steel before the collapse.

“I have been copied into some emails, discussions, about the testing ADCO had an independent lab did, showing some inconsistencies of the steel,” Zhang said.

“That’s when we realised there could be some issues with the steel complying to the standards.

“I believe it was before the collapse.

“The message was quite clear. The message was ‘we found some inconsistencies that need to be questioned’.”

While he was sent lab results highlighting issues with the content and strength of the Chinese steel, Zhang said he did not look into the details because he was working full-time on another job and left it to ADCO senior project engineer Zlatan Radakovic to urgently follow up on the concerns.

Loading

Zhang told the court that he was invited to a meeting at the Kew site days after the collapse, though he claimed he was never interviewed by management about why he thought the roof had failed.

“I showed up and one of the senior site managers kind of comforted me to make sure I don’t have any psychological or mental issues,” he said.

“And the other part (of the meeting) was for management to explain to the team that we are working with WorkSafe and don’t spread rumours, don’t go around and tell people what you think, it doesn’t help because none of us is qualified to tell what was the reason.”

After Carr reminded Zhang of an email he sent to his managers five days after the collapse - which was titled ‘preliminary findings on shop drawings to GT1’ - Zhang said he had forgotten offering his opinion and providing information on what had gone wrong with the failed truss, called GT1.

Later, after being taken through a series of messages exchanged during the project, Zhang confirmed he received a call from the project’s engineer during the steel’s fabrication asking for a change to increase its gauge, which presented a “big financial and time impact” for the client.

“I remember it was a very brief call. We didn’t dive into the details, but he made it clear it’s required for engineering purposes. So if that point is clear to me, it would be a complete waste of time to argue with him,” Zhang said.

When asked if the team failed to resubmit the plans for approval due to time pressures on the Kew project, Zhang denied any additional approvals were required, though said they would have been ideal.

“We didn’t reissue the shop drawings because the shop drawings was approved,” Zhang said.

“If I had time I would definitely resubmit it, but I would maintain that the drawings was approved and the engineer never asked for resubmission.

“It’s a better practice, I agree with you, but it wouldn’t be a mistake.”

The hearing continues.

https://www.theage.com.au/national/victoria/the-warning-sign-about-chinese-steel-before-kew-pool-roof-collapse-20250723-p5mh9r.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109405

File: fa649a74d4ba60e⋯.jpg (1.43 MB,3543x2335,3543:2335,Clipboard.jpg)

File: e13b8855598a50d⋯.jpg (636.67 KB,3543x2279,3543:2279,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23383645 (261141ZJUL25) Notable: Britain pledges 50-year AUKUS support in message to Trump – The UK government has committed to a 50-year treaty with Australia to strengthen the AUKUS defence pact, with a $41 billion investment to build new submarine fleets. The treaty is seen as a countermeasure to US President Donald Trump's doubts about AUKUS, with his administration conducting a review of the agreement. UK Defence Secretary John Healey emphasized that the treaty would enhance security in the Indo-Pacific and NATO, while also creating thousands of jobs in both the UK and Australia. The deal is a significant move in the face of US skepticism over the pact.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109299

>>109316

>>109392

Britain pledges 50-year AUKUS support in message to Trump

David Crowe and Matthew Knott - July 25, 2025

1/2

London: The British government will sign a 50-year treaty with Australia to cement the AUKUS defence pact in a massive strategic and financial deal, backing the plan when it is under extraordinary pressure from US President Donald Trump and his advisers.

The treaty will include a $41 billion pledge to scale up industry in both countries to build new submarine fleets with a common design, amid fears that Trump will undercut AUKUS and leave Australia and the UK exposed.

But the deal will require a soaring investment from Australia to ramp up construction in the UK on the new design for nuclear-propelled submarines, after it made another $800 million payment to the US to support its shipbuilding.

The new treaty is a significant move from Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and his British counterpart Sir Keir Starmer because it counters the open questions in the Trump administration about whether AUKUS will work.

Albanese and Starmer have formed a personal friendship that helps deepen support for AUKUS in both governments at a crucial point when Trump advisers are reviewing the three-way defence pact struck in 2021.

The new treaty will be signed when UK Defence Secretary John Healey and UK Foreign Secretary David Lammy visit Australia from Friday for annual AUKMIN talks, just as a Royal Navy aircraft carrier visits Darwin during the Talisman Sabre defence exercise.

Defence Minister Richard Marles said the agreement was “as significant a treaty [as] has been signed between our two countries since Federation”.

Healey said: “It’s a treaty to build the most powerful, the most advanced attack submarines our two navies have ever had. It’s a treaty that strengthens NATO, as well as security in the Indo-Pacific. It’s a treaty that will … safeguard the security of our children and our children’s children to come.”

Marles said the three AUKUS nations were forging ahead with the partnership even as the Trump administration reviewed the pact.

“A new government undertaking a review is the most natural thing in the world,” he said. “We welcome the review which is being undertaken by the Trump administration.”

Trump’s approach to AUKUS is in doubt while the Pentagon conducts a review led by Department of Defence undersecretary Elbridge Colby, a critic of the agreement. There is no formal deadline for the review.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109406

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23383680 (261200ZJUL25) Notable: Video: Australia and UK announce new 50-year AUKUS deal amid US submarine review – Australia and the UK have announced a new 50-year AUKUS treaty, pledging to strengthen defence and industry ties despite US-led review concerns. The treaty, which includes a significant industrial plan to build new nuclear-powered submarines, was unveiled as both nations emphasised the importance of the Indo-Pacific and the geopolitical ties between Ukraine and China. UK Defence Secretary John Healey highlighted the indivisibility of security between the Euro-Atlantic and Indo-Pacific regions, while Australian Defence Minister Richard Marles downplayed concerns about the US review, calling it “the most natural thing in the world.”

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109299

>>109316

>>109405

Australia and UK announce new 50-year AUKUS deal amid US submarine review

JAMES DOWLING and SARAH ISON - July 25, 2025

1/2

Australia and the UK have reached agreement on a 50-year AUKUS pledge sold as the greatest military leap since the establishment of the navy, despite the thunder clouds presented by a US-led review into the submarine deal.

Senior politicians of both nations on Friday also emphasised geostrategic ties between Indo-Pacific law and order and the conflict in Ukraine, at a key diplomatic meeting between Defence Minister Richard Marles, Foreign Affairs Minister Penny Wong, and their British counterparts.

The absence of delegates for the third AUKUS partner, the US, loomed large over the proceedings, with Australia under American pressure to raise defence spending after Anthony Albanese’s failure to score a face-to-face meeting with US President Donald Trump.

Mr Marles and Senator Wong, joined by UK Defence Secretary John Healey and Foreign Secretary David Lammy, on Friday announced the new 50-year AUKUS treaty to be signed on ­Saturday in Geelong.

It would “underpin … the biggest industrial endeavour that our nation has ever seen”, Mr Marles said on Friday.

“It will give rise to the biggest leap in military capability that our nation has had since, frankly, the establishment of the navy back in 1913,” he said from the lawn of ­Admiralty House.

“It is a profoundly important treaty that we will sign tomorrow. It forms part of a trilateral agreement that we have, and we are really confident about the progress of all three countries in bringing that to fruition.”

Both Mr Marles and Mr Healy were at pains to emphasise the treaty would be an action plan for delivering on the August 2024 AUKUS treaty signed in Washington, rather than a bilateral shift away from the US to shore up the agreement under the uncertainty of the Trump administration.

The meeting comes as part of the Australia-UK Ministerial Consultations, or AUKMIN, and is the second joint delegation since the election of the Starmer government in 2024.

The meeting follows Britain sending a Royal Navy aircraft carrier, the Prince of Wales, and its ­accompanying fleet to Darwin this week in what is the first such visit in nearly 30 years.

Operation High Mast was launched in April in a sign of Britain’s intention to ramp up its presence in the Indo-Pacific, as questions are raised over China’s intention to reunify Taiwan in coming years and tension between Beijing and the US continues.

It will be folded into the ongoing training exercise Operation Talisman Sabre, in which 3000 UK personnel will take part.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109407

File: 375759502c76879⋯.jpg (1.57 MB,1650x1100,3:2,Clipboard.jpg)

File: cb9ff4c47f7f2c5⋯.jpg (694.56 KB,1650x1100,3:2,Clipboard.jpg)

File: ca7b0772094d22b⋯.jpg (398.76 KB,1639x2048,1639:2048,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23383895 (261315ZJUL25) Notable: PM labels Gaza a 'humanitarian catastrophe' and reaffirms aspiration for Palestinian statehood – Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has labelled the Gaza conflict a "humanitarian catastrophe" and reiterated Australia's commitment to a two-state solution. He condemned Israel’s actions, including denial of aid and civilian casualties, calling on Israel to comply with international law. While France plans to officially recognise Palestine, Albanese did not directly address this move but affirmed Australia's long-standing position on a Palestinian state. Foreign Minister Penny Wong stated that Australia would not follow France’s lead but would continue to push for a ceasefire and increased aid to Gaza.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109386

>>109387

>>109388

PM labels Gaza a 'humanitarian catastrophe' and reaffirms aspiration for Palestinian statehood

Tom Lowrey - 25 July 2025

1/2

The prime minister has labelled the conflict in Gaza a "humanitarian catastrophe", while reaffirming an existing commitment to a two-state solution.

France has announced it will formally recognise Palestine later this year, becoming the largest and most influential European nation to do so.

In some of his strongest language on the conflict yet, Anthony Albanese said the conflict has gone "beyond the world's worst fears".

"Gaza is in the grip of a humanitarian catastrophe. Israel's denial of aid and the killing of civilians, including children, seeking access to water and food, cannot be defended or ignored," he said.

"We call on Israel to comply immediately with its obligations under international law."

It follows Australia joining 27 other countries in a joint statement earlier this week demanding an immediate end to the war.

Israel labelled those joint calls "disconnected from reality", arguing the attention of those countries should be focused on the actions of Hamas.

Australia does not recognise a Palestinian state, instead referring officially to the West Bank and Gaza as the "Occupied Palestinian Territories", though it does have diplomatic ties with the Palestinian Authority.

Albanese pushed to follow France

The new comments from Mr Albanese do not refer directly to France's moves to recognise Palestine, but point to Australia's long-standing ambitions around recognition.

"Recognising the legitimate aspirations of the Palestinian people for a state of their own has long been a bipartisan position in Australia," he said.

"The reason a two-state solution remains the goal of the international community is because a just and lasting peace depends upon it.

"Australia is committed to a future where both the Israeli and Palestinian peoples can live in peace and safety, within secure and internationally recognised borders."

Former Labor minister and MP Ed Husic said the Australian government should follow France's lead and formally recognise Palestine.

Speaking on the ABC's Afternoon Briefing, Mr Husic said Australia had "the perfect opportunity" to do so.

"We should move to recognise Palestine now, standing alongside France, because there will be a number of countries that will do so," he said.

"The time is now for us to stand and step forward and say we will recognise the State of Palestine now."

Israel's ambassador to Australia, Amir Maimon, said pressure "must be placed where it belongs, on Hamas".

"To condemn Israel for defending itself is wrong," he said on X.

"It deflects attention from the real perpetrators of this horror: Hamas."

Last year, Foreign Minister Penny Wong indicated Australia was considering recognising a Palestinian state as part of a peace process, rather than at the endpoint.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109408

File: 3c02ecaad9960c3⋯.jpg (453.32 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: f63a5b0724bc254⋯.jpg (361.99 KB,1920x1080,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23384004 (261334ZJUL25) Notable: Farmers have a beef with Anthony Albanese’s ‘move to woo Donald Trump – Australian beef producers have raised concerns over the Albanese government’s decision to loosen biosecurity restrictions on US beef imports, calling it "dangerous" and a potential risk to the $14bn industry. The decision allows beef sourced from Canada and Mexico, slaughtered in the US, into Australia, despite previous concerns over diseases like mad cow. Industry groups are demanding an independent review of the decision, questioning whether biosecurity and traceability measures are sufficient. Critics argue the decision is politically motivated, aimed at smoothing relations between Australia and the US ahead of Prime Minister Albanese's upcoming meeting with President Trump.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>>/qresearch/23372922

Farmers have a beef with Anthony Albanese’s ‘move to woo Donald Trump’

MATTHEW DENHOLM - July 24, 2025

Australian beef producers fear the Albanese government’s decision to loosen biosecurity restrictions on US imports is “dangerous”, risking the introduction of “devastating” diseases such as mad cow.

Cattle Australia and peak state industry bodies are demanding an independent review of the decision, which means Australia will accept beef from the US sourced from Canada and Mexico but slaughtered in the US.

Some beef producers accused the government of placing their $14bn export industry at risk for the sake of facilitating a meeting between the Prime Minister and US President Donald Trump.

Other meat sectors, particularly pork, expressed concerns they might be next for relaxed biosecurity controls, unravelling a system that keeps safe Australia’s $82bn red meat and livestock trade.

“We fully support open trade, open access, minimal barriers, but if a biosecurity issue exists, then we need to know what the science-based review is,” Cattle Australia deputy chair Adam Coffey told The Australian.

Mr Coffey said the decision set a “dangerous precedent” and called on the government to release the detailed justification for the change – something Agriculture Minister Julie Collins said was “not what is done usually”.

The US has had beef access into Australia since 2019, but the announcement on Thursday removes a key impediment, allowing beef sourced from cattle born in Canada or Mexico and legally imported and slaughtered in the US.

Mr Coffey, a Queensland beef producer, said there was lack of information to judge whether bio­security and traceability measures were sufficient and an independent inquiry was justified. A similar inquiry was held after the decision to allow Thai prawns to be imported into Australia, he said.

The industry was “dis­appointed” that it had little warning of the decision. “If this is the benchmark for industry consultation, then it’s going to be a wild ride for the next few years,” he said.

West Australian beef producer and WA Farmers livestock president Geoff Pearson said mad cow disease had been detected in Canadian and Mexican beef processed in the US in the past.

“It’s game over if that gets into our cattle herd and our products – it closes down a very valuable industry,” Mr Pearson told The Australian. “It would be catastrophic. Having to burn herds of livestock is not pretty. You are potentially threatening the Australian beef and meat industry with a breach of biosecurity or outbreak for a market that is not necessary and that Australia doesn’t need.

“(The US) doesn’t have a robust system like ours for traceability (of product). We need to see the science and see they’ve fixed their traceability systems and their processing compliance … which didn’t meet regulations.”

Mr Pearson, who runs 15,000 Angus beef cattle near Badgin­garra, about 200km north of Perth, questioned the motivation and timing of the announcement.

“Is it around the political side of things, with our Prime Minister meeting with Trump very soon?” he said. “Is it to smooth over the relationship? That’s concerning.”

US Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins added to these suspicions by claiming the decision as “yet another example of the kind of market access the President ­negotiates to bring America into a new golden age”.

In March, Mr Trump erroneously claimed Australia “bans” US beef. “They’re wonderful people, and wonderful everything — but they ban American beef,” he said.

Ms Collins said the decision followed a “rigorous”, five-year assessment by departmental offici­als, including in the US.

“We are assured the supply chain and the traceability and the safety of any food coming into Australia is safe,” she said.

“This is a decision based on science.”

She said government had been “keeping the industry informed the entire way”.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/agribusiness/farmers-have-a-beef-with-pms-move-to-woo-trump/news-story/9861f6c09106c756ffb2a58cf5660e9a

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109409

File: c8a63dfdbf8b1cc⋯.jpg (241.75 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 579ea9093910a37⋯.jpg (363.29 KB,1100x409,1100:409,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23384239 (261419ZJUL25) Notable: Australia opens market to US beef imports amid Trump celebration – US President Donald Trump has hailed Australia’s decision to reverse its beef import ban as a triumph for his trade agenda, claiming it proves US beef is the "safest and best in the world." The reversal will allow beef from cattle raised in Canada and Mexico and processed in the US into Australia. While the move was celebrated by the US and its agricultural bodies, Australian beef producers and the Nationals party have raised concerns over potential biosecurity risks, calling for an independent review of the decision. Treasurer Jim Chalmers defended the move, citing the scientific process behind the decision.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>>/qresearch/23372922

>>109408

Australia opens market to US beef imports amid Trump celebration

Donald Trump has declared Australia’s beef ban reversal a triumph of his trade agenda, boasting that the deal proves the US has the ‘best’ beef in the world.

Vanessa Marsh - July 25, 2025

1/2

US President Donald Trump has celebrated Australia’s reversal of its beef import ban, claiming it as a victory for his trade agenda.

Posting on Truth Social, Mr Trump applauded the decision, while his trade chief credited the breakthrough as the “direct result” of the President’s push to confront “unfair trading practices.”

“After many years Australia has agreed to accept American Beef!” he said on his Truth Social platform.

“For a long time, and even though we are great friends, they actually banned our Beef.

“Now, we are going to sell so much to Australia because this is undeniable and irrefutable Proof that U.S. Beef is the Safest and Best in the entire World.

“The other Countries that refuse our magnificent Beef are ON NOTICE. All of our Nation’s Ranchers, who are some of the hardest working and most wonderful people, are smiling today, which means I am smiling too.”

Nationals leader David Littleproud said the Trump Administration’s victory lap over Labor’s decision to allow more US beef into Australia seemed to have “validated” his concern a deal was done before the biosecurity protocols were finalised.

Mr Littleproud said comments in the past 24 hours made by the US Administration were at odds with Labor’s claim that the move was predicated on biosecurity and science.

He added industry was also backing his calls for an independent review into the decision. “We need to know if Labor is sacrificing our high biosecurity standards just so Prime Minister Anthony Albanese can obtain a meeting with US President Donald Trump,” Mr Littleproud said.

“The Prime Minister should be using our strong relationship with the US and our AUKUS deal as a solid reason to obtain a much-needed meeting with President Trump.”

But Treasurer Jim Chalmers has rejected the Nationals’ characterisation of the beef import decision, saying the call to allow US products from cattle raised or born in Mexico or Canada had followed a “longstanding” process.

“It’s a scientific process that involves experts and scientists and it makes sure that our arrangements are up to scratch,” he said.

“I see that there’s a lot of commentary around this in the last day or two.

“I know that our political opponents want to play their usual low-rent politics over it but this is a long-standing scientific process.

“It’s coming to a conclusion and it’s all about making sure that we have the best arrangements based on the best scientific advice.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109410

File: bfd537fbdd3a843⋯.jpg (193.31 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 9be529e72adbc66⋯.jpg (427.24 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: aa7f90365760e55⋯.jpg (131.73 KB,1100x217,1100:217,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23384298 (261430ZJUL25) Notable: ‘This is very big’: Delighted Trump hails Australian beef deal for a second day – US President Donald Trump has continued to celebrate Australia's decision to lift restrictions on US beef imports, claiming it would be the "first time" American beef would be sold in Australia. Trump hailed the decision as proof that US beef is the "safest and best in the entire world." While Australia had not previously banned US beef, the new policy allows beef from cattle raised in Canada and Mexico to be imported via the US. Agriculture Minister Julie Collins and Trade Minister Don Farrell denied any connection between the decision and ongoing tariff negotiations with the US.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>>/qresearch/23372922

>>109408

>>109409

‘This is very big’: Delighted Trump hails Australian beef deal for a second day

Benedict Brook - July 26, 2025

Donald Trump has again riffed about Australia’s decision to allow more US beef to come in to the country claiming on Friday it would be the “first time” American beef would be sold in Australia.

Seemingly out of the blue on Friday, and a full day after he declared victory due to Australia dropping its restrictions, Mr Trump was back on his TruthSocial platform talking about it again.

“Australia to take US BEEF for first time,” he wrote on Friday morning, US time.

“A very BIG market. I hope our GREAT FARMERS ARE HAPPY. MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!!!”

Australia had not banned US beef. But on Thursday, agriculture minister Julie Collins confirmed Australia will remove the ban on American beef that came from cattle originating in Canada and Mexico after a decade-long review.

It was originally put in place to stop bovine spongiform encephalopathy, known as mad cow disease, from coming into Australia.

Since 2019, Australia has allowed imports of beef raised and slaughtered in the US. But it did not allow for the import into Australia via the US of beef raised in neighbouring countries.

Additional measures put in place by the US to track the origin of Canadian and Mexican beef are being cited as the reason Australia is now satisfied.

“For a long time, and even though we are great friends, they actually banned our Beef,” said Mr Trump on Thursday, US time.

Now, we are going to sell so much to Australia because this is undeniable and irrefutable Proof that US Beef is the Safest and Best in the entire World.”

The US imports billions of dollars of Australian beef each years which is leaner than American beef.

Decision based on ‘science’

The Albanese government has been quick to deny the timing has anything to do with drawn-out tariff talks with the US, reported NewsWire.

But removing restrictions was one of Washington’s key demands in tariff negotiations, with Mr Trump specifically accusing Australia of banning American beef during remarks on “liberation day” – the day the US imposed blanket tariffs on all foreign imports, including Australian products.

But both Ms Collins and Trade Minister Don Farrell have claimed it is simply a coincidence the beef review ended just weeks after the US President threatened a 200 per cent tariff on foreign-made pharmaceuticals.

“We haven’t made any compromise, and we certainly haven’t compromised Australia’s strict biosecurity laws,” Senator Farrell told reporters huddled in a Parliament House corridor on Thursday.

“This has been a process that’s been underway for the last 10 years.

“It’s now come to a completion, and it’s appropriate that we announce the results of that inquiry, but at no stage do we risk our terrific biosecurity standards for any trade arrangement.”

https://www.news.com.au/world/north-america/us-politics/this-is-very-big-delighted-trump-hails-australian-beef-deal-for-a-second-day/news-story/1a3a91363f10a1fffb0addcda1a9670b

https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/114914339003272307

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109411

File: acc1446c3536d09⋯.jpg (147.03 KB,1440x1440,1:1,Clipboard.jpg)

File: c07b8a0f82579b7⋯.jpg (694.05 KB,2000x1333,2000:1333,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23386791 (270022ZJUL25) Notable: Trump’s Aussie ‘alpha male’ is falling flat in Malaysia – US President Donald Trump’s nomination of Nick Adams as ambassador to Malaysia has sparked protests, with the nominee’s past Islamophobic remarks and support for Israel drawing backlash. Adams, an Australian-born, naturalized US citizen, has a history of making controversial statements, including advocating for internment of Muslims and criticising Palestinian support. His nomination has raised concerns in Malaysia, particularly due to his stance on Palestine, a key issue for the country. Despite this, Malaysia’s government, seeking better trade relations with the US, may reluctantly accept Adams, though critics argue he is not the right choice.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109294

>>109295

Trump’s Aussie ‘alpha male’ is falling flat in Malaysia

Zach Hope - July 24, 2025

1/2

US President Donald Trump’s nomination of a right-wing provocateur with a history of making Islamophobic remarks as his man in Muslim-majority Malaysia has gone down, of course, like a lead balloon.

Protests in Kuala Lumpur against would-be ambassador Nick Adams kicked off last week and will probably return if he is waved through as expected in an upcoming Senate confirmation hearing.

Adams, an Australian-accented, naturalised American who self-identifies as an “alpha male” with “oozing masculine confidence” and “charisma”, fawned his way into the US president’s favour as a brash, conservative pundit and MAGAsphere influencer.

Braggadocio aside, the main reason Malaysians are upset at his nomination – to their country, of all places – is his hostility to the plight of Palestine, a cause close to the hearts of millions of Malaysians, and his history of making Islamophobic remarks, which includes denigrating Trump’s rivals as supporters of Islam and critiquing efforts to “teach Islam in schools”.

Then there is this anecdote Adams himself posted to X last year.

“I sat down for lunch today with a broker on a deal,” he wrote. “The waitress arrived wearing a Free Palestine pin. I demanded to speak with the owner. I had Leslie promptly fired, and then closed my deal.

“I won’t tolerate being served by those who support terror, I stand with Israel.”

While unverified, the anecdote shines a spotlight on how Adams sees himself and the situation in the Middle East, which could be problematic in Malaysia, where Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim and other government types are often seen in scarves with the pattern of a keffiyeh in a show of Palestinian solidarity.

Will Adams treat the prime minister the same as “Leslie”?

The 40-year-old was barely known in his native Australia before being tapped by Trump this month. His claim to fame before packing up for the US was being Australia’s youngest ever deputy mayor (for Ashfield council in Sydney), a platform he used in the mid-noughties to spout wacky ideas that went nowhere, like culling pigeons to stop avian flu.

The Americans, however, put him on the telly and conservative speaking circuits, where he has relished owning woke lefties, worshipping Trump and espousing supposed old-school masculinity.

This, of course, caught Trump’s eye. The president returned the love by endorsing Adams’ books, including 2016’s Retaking America, in which the author declares, “We don’t want a president who has more sympathy for Muslims than Jews” and “there are many peaceful and law-abiding Muslims, but this does not make Islam a religion of peace”.

In one passage, written in the context of Islamic State’s brutality in the Middle East, Adams muses on the “culturally confident, passionate” leaders of Australia and America who locked up people of Japanese descent during World War II.

“There is significant evidence of disloyalty ... both on the individual and mosque level. Yet never once, anywhere, to my knowledge, has the internment of Muslims as a policy idea been floated,” he wrote.

“Let me be clear: I am not advocating for the current internment of Muslims in America, Australia or anywhere else. But I also do not believe it should never be considered, nor do I believe anyone should fear raising the concept.”

Here is another titbit from Retaking America: “I’m a Western civilisation guy. I have little cultural interest in Asia and Africa. Except for Israel, I have no great impulse to visit the Middle East.”

Perhaps he has since discovered an appreciation for Asian cultures.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109412

File: ea22e713e776ca6⋯.jpg (375.08 KB,3800x2280,5:3,Clipboard.jpg)

File: e4ae85cee74bc9a⋯.jpg (222.32 KB,3800x3040,5:4,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 7423a726af17ec8⋯.jpg (211.17 KB,1280x1423,1280:1423,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23386936 (270058ZJUL25) Notable: Face age and ID checks? Using the internet in Australia is about to fundamentally change – New industry codes set to take effect in December will require Australians to undergo age checks on various online services, including search engines, social media, app stores, and AI chatbots. The codes, developed by the tech sector and the eSafety commissioner, aim to protect children from harmful content like pornography and self-harm material. While some welcome the changes, others warn of privacy concerns, with critics arguing that the regulations give tech companies more control over users' online activities. Non-compliant companies could face fines up to $49.5 million.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Face age and ID checks? Using the internet in Australia is about to fundamentally change

New codes developed by the tech sector and eSafety commissioner come into effect in December, with major ramifications for internet users

Josh Taylor - 20 Jul 2025

1/2

As the old adage goes, “On the internet, nobody knows you’re a dog”. But in Australia it might soon be the case that everything from search engines and social media sites, to app stores and AI chatbots will have to know your age.

The Albanese government trumpeted the passage of its legislation banning under 16s from social media – which will come into effect in December – but new industry codes developed by the tech sector and eSafety commissioner Julie Inman Grant under the Online Safety Act will probably have much larger ramifications for how Australians access the internet.

Measures to be deployed by online services could include looking at your account history, or using facial age assurance and bank card checks. Identity checks using IDs such as drivers licences to keep children under 16 off social media will also apply to logged-in accounts for search engines from December, under an industry code that came into force at the end of June.

The code will require search engines to have age assurance measures for all accounts, and where an account holder is determined to be aged under 18, the search engine would be required to switch on safe search features to filter out content such as pornography from search results.

Six more draft codes being considered by the eSafety commissioner would bring similar age assurance measures to a wide range of services Australians use every day, including app stores, AI chatbots and messaging apps.

Any service that hosts or facilitates access to content such as pornography, self-harm material, simulated gaming, or very violent material unsuitable for children will need to ensure children are not able to access that content.

In her National Press Club speech last month, Inman Grant flagged that the codes were needed to keep children safe at every level of the online world.

“It’s critical to ensure the layered safety approach which also places responsibility and accountability at critical chokepoints in the tech stack, including the app stores and at the device level, the physical gateways to the internet where kids sign-up and first declare their ages,” she said.

The eSafety commissioner announced the intention of the codes during the development process and when they were submitted, but recent media reporting has drawn renewed attention to these aspects of the codes.

Some people will welcome the changes. News this week that Elon Musk’s AI Grok now includes a pornographic chat while still being labelled suitable for ages 12+ on the Apple app store prompted child safety groups to call for Apple to review the app’s rating and implement child protection measures in the app store.

Apple and Google are already developing age checks at the device level that can also be used by apps to check the age of their users.

Founder of tech analysis company PivotNine, Justin Warren, says the codes would “implement sweeping changes to the regulation of communication between people in Australia”.

“It looks like a massive over-reaction after years of policy inaction to curtail the power of a handful of large foreign technology companies,” he says.

“That it hands even more power and control over Australians’ online lives to those same foreign tech companies is darkly hilarious.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109413

File: 1ac5537958fcc29⋯.jpg (1.82 MB,4032x3024,4:3,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 1f2f273ce2cb040⋯.jpg (1.66 MB,5000x3333,5000:3333,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23387071 (270125ZJUL25) Notable: Australia is quietly introducing 'unprecedented' age checks for search engines like Google – Australians will soon face mandatory age checks on major online services, including search engines, under new regulations set to take effect in December. The eSafety Commissioner has introduced industry codes requiring companies like Google and Microsoft to implement age-assurance technology for logged-in users. While aimed at protecting children from harmful content such as pornography, the changes have raised privacy concerns. The codes also mandate filtering out inappropriate content for users under 18. Non-compliance could result in fines up to $50 million. The regulations are expected to expand to more online sectors in the future.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109412

Australia is quietly introducing 'unprecedented' age checks for search engines like Google

Ange Lavoipierre - 11 Jul 2025

1/3

Australians will soon be subjected to mandatory age checks across the internet landscape, in what has been described as a huge and unprecedented change.

Search engines are next in line for the same controversial age-assurance technology behind the teen social media ban, and other parts of the internet are likely to follow suit.

At the end of June, Australia quietly introduced rules forcing companies such as Google and Microsoft to check the ages of logged-in users, in an effort to limit children's access to harmful content such as pornography.

But experts have warned the move could compromise Australians' privacy online and may not do much to protect young people.

"I have not seen anything like this anywhere else in the world," said Lisa Given, professor of Information Sciences from RMIT, who specialises in age-assurance technology.

"As people learn about the implications of this, we will likely see people stepping up and saying, 'Wait a minute, why wasn't I told that this was going to happen?'"

From December 27, Google — which dominates the Australian search market with a share of more than 90 per cent — and its rival, Microsoft, will have to use some form of age-assurance technology on users when they sign in, or face fines of almost $50 million per breach.

The search results for logged-in users under the age of 18 will be filtered for pornography, high-impact violence, material promoting eating disorders and a range of other content.

Despite the apparent magnitude of the shift, it has mostly gone unnoticed, in stark contrast to the political and media fanfare surrounding the teen social media ban, which will block under-16s from major platforms using similar technology.

As for why so few people have noticed, it may be because the changes took place away from the halls of parliament, in the relatively dry world of regulation.

They were contained in a new industry code — one of three registered by eSafety Commissioner Julie Inman Grant in June.

All up, the regulator will register nine codes this year, governing the conduct of internet service companies in Australia.

The regulator's media release about the new codes made no mention of the new age-assurance requirements, although Ms Inman Grant briefly mentioned the matter in her recent address to the National Press Club.

"These provisions will serve as a bulwark and operate in lock step with the new social media age limits," she said.

"It's critical to ensure the layered safety approach … including on the app stores and at the device level — the physical gateways to the internet where kids sign up and first declare their ages."

Her comments hint at plans for age checks for even more sectors of the internet.

Experts are concerned that almost no-one seems to be aware of the shift.

"This one has kind of popped out, seemingly out of the blue," Professor Given said.

"It's not clear that there is a social licence for such important and nuanced changes," Digital Rights Watch chair Lizzie O'Shea said.

"We would argue that the public deserves more of a say in how to balance these important human rights issues."

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109414

File: e19698922748da8⋯.jpg (191.56 KB,3800x2450,76:49,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 221dc8fb3b06dd6⋯.jpg (394.87 KB,3800x3040,5:4,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23387166 (270146ZJUL25) Notable: Opinion: Age verification is coming to search engines in Australia - with huge implications for privacy and inclusion"The way we use the internet in Australia is changing. Soon, it won’t just be social media platforms asking to verify your age. Come December, age verification requirements will also extend to search engines - with significant ramifications. That means you may need to scan your face or do an identity check to use a search engine as a logged-in user. And it’s unlikely to stop there: the eSafety commissioner is considering rules for mandatory age checks across the entire internet landscape. These are not small decisions; they will impact everyone who uses the internet in Australia." – Samantha Floreani, The Guardian.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109412

>>109413

Opinion: Age verification is coming to search engines in Australia – with huge implications for privacy and inclusion

New rules will radically change the way we use the internet in Australia, and not just social media

Samantha Floreani - 23 Jul 2025

1/2

The way we use the internet in Australia is changing. Soon, it won’t just be social media platforms asking to verify your age. Come December, age verification requirements will also extend to search engines – with significant ramifications.

That means you may need to scan your face or do an identity check to use a search engine as a logged-in user. And it’s unlikely to stop there: the eSafety commissioner is considering rules for mandatory age checks across the entire internet landscape.

Whether or not you support the idea of age-gating the internet, this is a huge, unprecedented change. These are not small decisions; they will impact everyone who uses the internet in Australia – not just people under 16. There are implications for privacy, digital inclusion, access to information and online participation that go beyond the controversial teen social media ban. All of this warrants meaningful public debate.

If this is the first time you’re hearing about it, you’re not alone. Despite the significance of the changes, these latest rules are the result of industry codes, which differs to regular legislation. These codes don’t go through parliament. Instead, they’re developed by the tech industry and registered by the eSafety commissioner in a process called co-regulation. On one hand, this can be good: it can allow for more flexibility or technology-specific detail that is less appropriate in legislation. On the other: it creates risk of industry co-option, and by bypassing parliamentary process, can give an enormous amount of power to an unelected official (in this case, the eSafety commissioner).

Greens senator David Shoebridge has called the implications of age verification for search engines “staggering” and noted that “these proposals don’t have to go through an elected parliament and we can’t vote them down no matter how significant concerns are. That combined with lack of public input is a serious issue.”

The age verification policy development process has been littered with blunders that make a mockery of meaningful consultation and evidence-based policy development. It is particularly striking that these codes were drafted before the completion of the government’s $6.5m trial into the efficacy of age assurance. Later, the trial’s preliminary findings conceded the technology is not guaranteed to be effective, and noted “concerning evidence” that some technology providers were seeking to collect too much personal information.

While a government-commissioned survey on the teen social media ban found overwhelming support in theory, it also found most people have no idea what that means in practice, with many uncomfortable with the methods it might entail – such as biometric face scanning or handing over your credit card details. And while there was much fanfare around the social media ban, it’s not clear there is a social licence to extend this approach to search engines and beyond. It seems many people may be unpleasantly surprised.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109415

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23387225 (270210ZJUL25) Notable: Video: Google threatens to sue the Australian Government if YouTube is added to social media age ban – Tech giant Google is threatening to sue the Australian Government on "constitutional grounds" if YouTube is included in the social media ban for children aged 16 and below. In a letter to Communications Minister Anika Wells, Google outlined three legal options, including a potential High Court challenge. The company argued that the age limit would prevent young adults from engaging in political communication via YouTube. Google also rejected the eSafety Commissioner’s recommendation to include YouTube, claiming it was a "video streaming platform" rather than a "social media platform."

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109412

>>109413

>>109414

Google threatens to sue the Australian Government if YouTube is added to social media age ban

Clare Armstrong - July 27, 2025

1/2

Tech giant Google is threatening to sue the Australian Government on “constitutional grounds” if YouTube is included in the social media ban for children aged 16 and below.

In a letter sent to Communications Minister Anika Wells on Thursday and obtained by this masthead, the company warned it was “considering its legal position” given the government was looking at “resiling” from its previous decision to exempt the platform.

YouTube is not currently captured by the age restriction due to take effect in December, but is being considered for inclusion following a recommendation from Australia’s eSafety Commissioner.

In a warning to the government, YouTube outlined three legal options open to it, including a potential High Court challenge arguing the ban would be an “impermissible fetter on the implied constitutional freedom of political communication”.

The company claimed the age limit would prevent young adults under the age of 16 from having an account and being able to “contribute to political communication by posting videos on YouTube and by making comments on those videos”.

In the letter, which was signed by YouTube Australia and New Zealand head of government affairs and public policy Rachel Lord, and Google Australia and New Zealand director of legal Shoshana Shields, the company also rejected the premise of the potential ban by arguing YouTube was a “video streaming platform” rather than a “social media platform” as defined in the legislation.

Thirdly, the company cast doubt on whether the late inclusion of YouTube would be an “appropriate” use of the minister’s power given the original legislation was passed last year on the “express understanding” the platform would be excluded.

“To the extent that the minister may be purporting to rely on the eSafety Commissioner’s advice as a basis for its change, we do not consider this can form a sufficient or proper basis for the change in position,” the letter said.

eSafety’s advice recommended no single platform or service, whether YouTube or others, be specifically excluded under the rules due to the fast-evolving nature of online platforms meaning their risk profile could quickly change.

But Google said it rejected the “robustness” of that advice, and argued nothing in it was “contrary” to the matters already considered by the government when the legislation was drafted and passed.

Under the current laws, social media platforms like TikTok, Snapchat, Instagram and Facebook are captured, but YouTube, Headspace, Kids Helpline and Google Classroom are not.

The letter said “regardless of its legal options” the company remained of the view there were “strong policy reasons” for its exclusion describing the issue as a “matter of grave concern to YouTube”.

It also claimed the ban would not protect children from harm as they would still be able to watch videos without an account, which would also expose them to more detrimental content as this would mean “targeted safety features that apply to the accounts of children and young adults will no longer apply”.

There has been a separate push for a distinction between the company’s main video platform and its “YouTube Shorts” component, which uses a different algorithm.

The company said if the government was considering going ahead with its inclusion it wanted “an opportunity to provide further submissions before any such decision is made”.

“If ultimately no exclusion is expressly provided, then YouTube contemplates having to engage with the options available to it,” the letter said.

The government declined to comment.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109416

File: a95afaabc444893⋯.jpg (2.42 MB,5419x3613,5419:3613,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 038bfc35266aff4⋯.jpg (879.06 KB,4368x2912,3:2,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23388125 (270739ZJUL25) Notable: Trade minister admits gaffe over Trump-Albanese beef talks – Trade Minister Don Farrell admitted he was wrong to claim that US President Donald Trump had raised Australian beef import restrictions in phone conversations with Prime Minister Anthony Albanese before the decision to lift the ban. The opposition is calling for a Senate inquiry and independent scientific review of the move, suggesting it was politically motivated. Albanese denied discussing the issue with Trump, and Farrell later clarified his statement, saying he had confused Trump’s public remarks with a private conversation. The lifting of the restrictions follows a 10-year independent review, according to Albanese.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>>/qresearch/23372922

>>109408

>>109409

Trade minister admits gaffe over Trump-Albanese beef talks

Matthew Knott - July 27, 2025

Trade Minister Don Farrell says he was wrong to claim that US President Donald Trump raised Australian restrictions on beef imports from North America in phone conversations with Prime Minister Anthony Albanese ahead of the decision to scrap the de facto ban.

The opposition is calling for both a Senate inquiry and an independent scientific review of the decision to end the restrictions, which they have suggested was made to help secure a trade deal with the Trump administration.

Asked about diplomatic discussions leading up to last week’s announcement, Farrell said on Sunday that: “Of course, the president of the United States has raised it with the prime minister”.

Pressed on when Trump and Albanese had discussed the issue, Farrell told Sky News: “I couldn’t tell you off the top of my head which of the discussions, but I’m aware that this issue was raised by the president of the United States, but that will not change the way in which we conduct and examine our biosecurity issues.”

Opposition foreign affairs spokeswoman Michaelia Cash leapt upon Farrell’s “extraordinary” comments, saying they had raised more questions about whether the process to ease restrictions on beef imports was purely science-based.

Albanese later told the ABC’s Insiders that he had not discussed the issue with Trump in any of their three phone conversations, refuting Farrell’s initial claim.

“I made a mistake,” Farrell told this masthead, adding that he had confused Trump’s remarks about Australian beef in the White House rose garden with a conversation between the two leaders.

Asked whether Trump had raised the issue with him, Albanese said: “No. Donald Trump, though, did raise it at the so-called Liberation Day, of course – he raised it publicly, so his views were well-known.”

Albanese insisted that “this wasn’t a political decision”, saying it was “absolutely” a coincidence that the Department of Agriculture decided to lift the restrictions after loud complaints from Trump.

“There has been an independent review, it took 10 years,” Albanese said, rejecting the opposition’s calls for an investigation into the move. “The decision has been made, and it was made independently at arm’s length of any political decision.”

Cash said: “It is even more imperative now that we need to ensure that the Australian Labor Party under Mr Albanese have not traded away our strict biosecurity standards, which all Australians understand need to be in place.”

Australia has allowed US beef into the country since 2019, but blocked meat from cattle that were born in Mexico and Canada before being slaughtered in America. This effectively meant that all beef from the continent was blocked, because US supply chains are highly integrated. No US beef has been imported since 2019.

The Trump administration has taken credit for the government’s move to lift the restrictions, hailing it as a major trade victory that would “make agriculture great again”.

“This is yet another example of the kind of market access the president negotiates to bring America into a new golden age of prosperity, with American agriculture leading the way,” US Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins said last week.

https://www.theage.com.au/politics/federal/trade-minister-admits-gaffe-over-trump-albanese-beef-talks-20250727-p5mi3k.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109417

File: 5fc4c94ecf84fa4⋯.jpg (144.05 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: c1fb1ce330a0fa9⋯.jpg (234 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23388140 (270747ZJUL25) Notable: Senior Democrat Joe Courtney calls for Trump administration to open up on Elbridge Colby’s AUKUS probe – US Congressman Joe Courtney has called for greater transparency around the AUKUS submarines review, criticizing the US Department of Defence for providing limited information. Courtney expressed concern over the Pentagon’s lack of clarity, particularly regarding the scope and timeline of the review. Despite ongoing work under the assumption that AUKUS will continue, the review’s findings and status remain unclear. Courtney emphasized the need for clearer guidance on the review’s direction, calling the current process frustrating for those involved.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109299

>>109316

>>109405

Senior Democrat Joe Courtney calls for Trump administration to open up on Elbridge Colby’s AUKUS probe

JOE KELLY - 27 July 2025

1/2

US congressman Joe Courtney says there should be greater clarity around the AUKUS submarines review, with another leading Democrat blasting the US Department of Defence for a lack of transparency and refusing to provide basic ­information and briefings when requested.

Mr Courtney, a Democrat from Connecticut and the co-chair of the Congressional Friends of Australia Caucus, said there was a “systemic issue” with the Pentagon and a “dearth of communication” in which information was only coming out in small “dribbles”.

He told The Australian the leadership of the US navy had briefed the Pentagon as part of the ongoing AUKUS review but again stressed he did not know “what the questions were that were asked or the answers that were given.”

The Albanese government has now made the second instalment of $800m dollars to the US under the AUKUS framework, bringing the total to $1.6bn, in the expectation that America will provide Australia with three Virginia-class submarines from the early 2030s.

Addressing the available information on the AUKUS review, Mr Courtney suggested confusing signals had been floated by the Pentagon. He said it was “really problematic” for work to be continuing on AUKUS by invested parties without more guidance on what was being examined.

Mr Courtney is the Democrats’ ranking member of the seapower and projection forces subcommittee of the House of Representatives armed services committee.

He said it was hard to know how seriously the review would be taken by President Donald Trump when it was finished, declaring that “the buck stops at the White House” and not with the Under Secretary of Defence for Policy, Elbridge Colby.

“We were told initially it was a 30-day review which obviously had people really sceptical that something that has been worked on for four years and had so much effort with the optimal pathway could get a fair analysis in 30 days,” he said. “I does seem like the Department (of Defence) pumped the brakes in terms of the framework.”

“It’s not clear why they did that or what is the new timeframe? I mean, in the meantime there’s still work going on … operating under the assumption that AUKUS is here to stay,” he said.

“So to have this happening with no sort of guidance about what’s the scope of this (review) in terms of people who are operating in good faith and relying on AUKUS being enduring is really problematic.”

“For me, it’s very frustrating and, for others, it’s just completely kind of a head scratcher trying to figure out what is the approach?”

It is not known what the time frame for the AUKUS review is; whether its findings will be released publicly either in full or in part; what parts of the AUKUS agreement are being examined; whether issues outside of AUKUS itself – such as Australia’s positioning on Taiwan – will factor into the review’s findings; whether it will make direct recommendations to the Trump administration or what status the review will have when completed.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109418

File: 15615b0d88db3f4⋯.jpg (243.98 KB,1280x720,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23388165 (270801ZJUL25) Notable: Michaelia Cash backs plan to ditch welcome to country, Indigenous flags – Senator Michaelia Cash has publicly supported two motions from the Liberal Party of WA to remove Aboriginal welcome-to-country ceremonies and flags from official government events. Cash, along with conservative figures like Canning MP Andrew Hastie, advocates for a focus on unifying under the Australian flag. The motions, set to be debated at the WA Liberal Party's state council meeting, reflect a push from the party’s conservative faction, with opponents arguing that these Aboriginal symbols are divisive and tokenistic. The debate continues within the party, with tensions over its future direction.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Michaelia Cash backs plan to ditch welcome to country, Indigenous flags

PAUL GARVEY and MOHAMMAD ALFARES - July 24, 2025

1/2

The highest-ranking Liberal woman MP behind Sussan Ley is part of a party push to ditch ­welcome-to-country ceremonies and Aboriginal flags from official events, putting senator Michaelia Cash at odds with the Opposition Leader on Indigenous symbolism.

Senator Cash, from Western Australia and the opposition’s Senate leader, on Thursday was swift to back publicly two motions prepared for the Liberal Party of WA’s state council this Saturday which demand the Aboriginal ­welcome-to-country speeches be stripped of “official status” and only commonwealth and state flags appear at government events.

The push comes as Anthony Albanese uses vanquished Liberal leader Peter Dutton’s opposition to Indigenous symbolism to attack the depleted opposition as out of step with mainstream Australia.

Ms Ley has said she is “happy” to stand alongside Aboriginal flags and has given her support to acknowledgements of country in the right “time and place”, even congratulating Indigenous participants at the opening of parliament this week and making her own odes to elders. But Senator Cash said she supported the motions to take Indigenous symbolism out of public life, and welcomed them being debated at the WA Liberal Party council.

“It has been my long-held belief that there is one national flag and we should all unite under it,” Senator Cash said.

“Formal commonwealth recognition should only be given to flags representing official jurisdictions or government institutions. On the welcome-to-country issue my position is consistent with the motion.

The motions – especially with Senator Cash’s support – signal a push from conservative figures across both the parliamentary party and the lay party for the Liberals to focus on their base.

The Australian revealed this week that the state council would also consider a motion – endorsed by Canning MP Andrew Hastie – for the party to formally abandon net-zero climate targets.

All three motions are expected to pass at Saturday’s meeting.

Mr Dutton had pledged to stand in front of only the ­Australian flag at his press ­conferences and had described welcome-to-country and acknowledgment-of-country ceremonies as “overdone”.

Ms Ley began her first major speech as Opposition Leader with an acknowledgement of country, before stating that there was a time and a place for the declarations.

Speaking at the official opening of parliament earlier this week, Ms Ley delivered her own acknowledgment of country and said the welcome to country that preceded her should “set the tone as we ­re-commit ourselves to the taking of practical action to improve lives and expand opportunity for Indigenous Australians in every part of our great country”.

The welcome-to-country and flag motions are understood to have support from a large group of WA Liberal MPs.

Mr Hastie sells A3-sized ­‘Together under one flag’ bin stickers through his website and has questioned the inclusion of welcome to country ceremonies at Anzac Day services.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109419

File: 9e9a3a5b3a8b8c1⋯.jpg (235.05 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 956e48ffdced12f⋯.jpg (255.39 KB,1999x1499,1999:1499,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 02e50ee32f9183b⋯.jpg (222 KB,1294x1725,1294:1725,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23388179 (270808ZJUL25) Notable: Motion to ditch welcome-to-country ceremonies passes WA Liberal state council – A motion passed by the WA Liberal state council calls for the removal of Aboriginal welcome-to-country ceremonies and the exclusion of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander flags from official proceedings. Senator Michaelia Cash publicly supported the motion, advocating for unity under the national flag. This position contrasts with Opposition Leader Sussan Ley, who has supported acknowledging country in the right context. A motion to abandon net-zero climate targets also passed, with conservative members expressing concerns over Australia’s energy security.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109418

Motion to ditch welcome-to-country ceremonies passes WA Liberal state council

MARCUS DE BLONK SMITH - July 26, 2025

A motion to scrap welcome-to-country ceremonies and freeze out the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander flags from official proceedings has passed the WA Liberal state council.

The motions demand Aboriginal welcome-to-country speeches be stripped of “official status” and only Commonwealth and state flags appear at government events.

Opposition Senate leader Michaelia Cash was quick to publicly back both motions this week.

Senator Cash said it had been a “long-held belief” of hers that Australians “unite” under one national flag.

“Formal Commonwealth recognition should only be given to flags representing official jurisdictions or government institutions,” she said.

The move puts Senator Cash at odds with Opposition Leader Sussan Ley who has said previously that she is “happy” to stand alongside Aboriginal flags and has backed acknowledgements of country in the right “time and place”.

A motion for the party to formally abandon net-zero climate targets also passed the WA Liberal state council on Saturday.

The move to dump net-zero climate targets was endorsed by Canning MP Andrew Hastie.

It comes as Sussan Ley faces a growing Coalition uprising to dump the party’s net-zero by 2050 policy.

Mr Hastie told The Australian this week that the motion reflected concerns among members over Australia’s energy security.

“It’s understandable and appropriate that our party members have their say on energy policy while it is under review by the federal party room,” he said.

The WA Liberal state council joins South Australia and the Northern Territory in backing a motion to ditch net-zero policy.

According to Liberal Party sources, the motions are the product of the party’s dominant conservative faction attempting “to flex a bit of muscle”.

Moderates within the party, sources say, wanted to avoid the motions.

“They don’t want to talk about those – no question,” the source said.

The welcome-to-country and flag motions were prepared by the party’s policy committee, which is chaired by former federal Liberal candidate Sherry Sufi.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/motion-to-ditch-welcometocountry-ceremonies-passes-wa-liberal-state-council/news-story/902c22920849ded2691ab41d28b24f57

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109420

File: ef4869752664fc4⋯.jpg (859.36 KB,1455x970,3:2,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 860c27fac398720⋯.jpg (389.17 KB,2000x1333,2000:1333,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23388321 (270925ZJUL25) Notable: ‘We won’t make a decision as a gesture’: Albanese says no imminent move to recognise Palestine – Prime Minister Anthony Albanese rejected calls for Australia to immediately recognise Palestine, stating the decision would be made at the "appropriate time." He condemned Israel's restrictions on aid to Gaza as a breach of international law and morality but said Australia would only recognise Palestine once key conditions, such as the removal of Hamas from power, are met. Former foreign minister Bob Carr and other Labor figures urged quicker recognition, but Albanese emphasized that any recognition should be substantive, not symbolic.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109386

>>109387

>>109407

‘We won’t make a decision as a gesture’: Albanese says no imminent move to recognise Palestine

Matthew Knott - July 27, 2025

1/2

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has accused Israel of breaking international law by restricting the entry of aid into Gaza, while rebuffing calls within the party to quickly recognise Palestinian statehood.

The Israeli military has announced that airdrops of aid will begin in Gaza and humanitarian corridors will be established for United Nations convoys to deliver food after growing international condemnation over starvation in the beleaguered strip.

Albanese told the ABC’s Insiders program on Sunday morning that “quite clearly, it is a breach of international law to stop food being delivered, which was a decision that Israel made in March”.

Albanese added that, while he is not a lawyer, he considers Israeli restrictions on food and other supplies entering Gaza as a “breach of decency, humanity and morality”.

He said that the flood of images of suffering in Gaza - including a severely malnourished one-year-old boy – “just breaks your heart”.

“A one-year-old boy is not a Hamas fighter, and the [scale of] civilian casualties and death in Gaza is completely unacceptable, it’s completely indefensible,” he said.

Albanese said in a statement on Friday that the situation in Gaza “has gone beyond the world’s worst fears” and called on Israel to “comply immediately with its obligations under international law”.

Asked whether he would join French President Emmanuel Macron by recognising Palestine at the United Nations General Assembly in September, Albanese said: “No, we will make a decision at an appropriate time ... Is the time right now? Are we about to imminently do that? No, we are not.”

Albanese indicated that Australia would only recognise Palestine after key conditions, such as the removal of Hamas from power in Gaza, are met.

“We support two states, so some would argue, ‘Well, why don’t you just recognise the state?’” he asked.

“You need to recognise a Palestinian state as part of moving forward. How do you exclude Hamas from any involvement there? How do you ensure that a Palestinian state operates in an appropriate way that does not threaten the existence of Israel?”

He continued: “We won’t do any decision as a gesture. We will do it as a way forward if the circumstances are met.”

Albanese also noted that there had been no elections in Palestine for many years, presenting another hurdle to recognising a Palestinian state.

Former foreign minister Bob Carr, a strong supporter of Palestine, said it was “embarrassing” that Albanese appeared to want to move in unison with the United Kingdom rather than move swiftly to recognise Palestine.

“I can’t think of anything better we could do to improve our standing with crucial neighbours like Indonesia and Malaysia than take action on this issue,” he said.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109421

File: 61c316416f2d5e9⋯.jpg (1.86 MB,3549x2366,3:2,Clipboard.jpg)

File: bf31bb81392df92⋯.jpg (2.37 MB,3024x4032,3:4,Clipboard.jpg)

File: f42d847e625b07e⋯.jpg (703.11 KB,1536x2048,3:4,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 00769284ae51bc6⋯.jpg (239.89 KB,943x1619,943:1619,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23388366 (270941ZJUL25) Notable: Inside Australia’s biggest war games, Exercise Talisman Sabre – Thousands of military personnel, including from the US Coast Guard, have converged on Darwin for the nation’s largest war games, Talisman Sabre 2025. This year’s exercise, involving Australian Defence Personnel and the US military, sees a bigger focus on “the enemy,” as concerns rise over threats to Australia. The training takes place in a fictitious country, “Belesia,” with both attack and defence teams. In this iteration, exercises stretch to Papua New Guinea and Christmas Island. The ADF continues to emphasize the peaceful nature of the training, despite China’s surveillance of the exercises.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109224

>>109320

Inside Australia’s biggest war games, Exercise Talisman Sabre

Cloe Read - JULY 25, 2025

1/2

It’s a sweltering morning in the top end of Australia, where thousands of military personnel have swarmed Darwin’s coastline for the nation’s largest war games.

Members of the US Coast Guard bring reporters through Darwin’s turquoise waters off Larrakeyah Barracks on a fast ride through the security zone.

There’s chatter about the clear differences between how Australia and the US protect their coasts. Military vessels circle the water, a heavy presence as ordinary boaties cruise through.

Further along the coast, a group of soldiers has set up to practise firing. There, they wait for civilian watercraft to pass through, the boaties seemingly unperturbed by the military.

For many Darwin residents, the huge influx of armed forces to the region is not a surprise.

And many of the troops have been here before.

But some say this year’s Talisman Sabre, the 11th iteration of the training exercise comprising mainly Australian Defence Personnel and members of the US military, is different.

There’s a bigger focus on “the enemy”.

Questions swirl in the political bubble about potential threats to Australia.

Talisman Sabre kicked off as Prime Minister Anthony Albanese met with Chinese President Xi Jinping in Beijing.

Albanese has vowed not to back down on security measures, such as taking back control of the Port of Darwin, controversially leased by Chinese firm Landbridge.

Uneasiness hangs in the air in Darwin as journalists ask defence commanders questions regarding China surveilling the war games.

The Chinese have routinely monitored military training from afar in recent years.

Royal Australian Air Force Commander Louise DesJardins tells a media pack that while the ADF keeps an eye on maritime approaches, “at the moment we’re not happy to discuss the surveillance”.

The ADF consistently pushes the message that the war games are not, in fact, targeted at any particular country, and are more for maintaining peace.

US Brigadier-General Shannon Smith, serving with one of Australia’s steadfast allies, points to the massive scope of the region and what he says are the complexities of international relationships.

“I’ve seen nothing but a consistent messaging from our administration and our national defence strategy that we’re committed to a rule-based order across the globe,” he says.

But reporters ask the troops if they feel prepared for war.

Many say they are.

They acknowledge what they’ve learned in previous exercises, sometimes serving on “attack” teams, other times in defence.

This stifling day in Darwin, Mark Hazlett, a captain in the Australian Army’s reserve 31st/42nd Battalion of the Royal Queensland Regiment, is serving in the “enemy” team.

For this exercise, both the attack and defence teams are operating in a fictitious country, “Belesia”.

Strategies employed are “open source, obviously derived from our knowledge of the operation procedures and tactics from world actors”, Hazlett says.

His personnel are tasked with testing the contingencies of the defence team, who represent Australia and its allies.

“That includes having a look at the vulnerabilities, and trying to exploit those as enemy combatants,” he says.

Soldiers get to practise detention, handling skills, vehicle checkpoints, and other tactics with personnel from the US, Britain and Canada. For the first time, the exercises have stretched to Papua New Guinea and Christmas Island.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109422

File: 9fd791d598ba42c⋯.mp4 (13.57 MB,640x360,16:9,Clipboard.mp4)

File: 134927161b76efb⋯.jpg (200.27 KB,1200x802,600:401,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 816b16aeec7cd4c⋯.jpg (127.11 KB,1024x682,512:341,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 1749b4cda6733cd⋯.jpg (118.02 KB,1024x682,512:341,Clipboard.jpg)

File: b02064bcbb29c20⋯.jpg (1.68 MB,4752x3168,3:2,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23388424 (270957ZJUL25) Notable: Video: Australian Army's new Precision Strike Missile fired at NT's Mount Bundey during Exercise Talisman Sabre – The Australian Army has successfully test-fired its Precision Strike Missile (PrSM) for the first time at Mount Bundey Training Area in the Northern Territory. The missile, launched from High Mobility Artillery Rocket Systems (HIMARS), reached its target 300 kilometres away in just over four minutes. Developed for the United States Army, the missile provides Australia with enhanced deterrence capabilities. Defence Industry Minister Pat Conroy highlighted the importance of this advancement in strengthening the Indo-Pacific deterrence strategy. This launch took place during the joint military exercise Talisman Sabre 2025, which involves over 40,000 personnel.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109224

>>109320

Australian Army's new Precision Strike Missile fired at NT's Mount Bundey during Exercise Talisman Sabre

Roxanne Fitzgerald - 27 July 2025

The Australian Army has test fired its newest long-range missile for the first time, launching the weapon from a remote army training base in the Northern Territory.

The Precision Strike Missile (PrSM), which can hit distant targets with minimal warning and high accuracy, was fired from the Mount Bundey Training Area, south-east of Darwin, on Friday.

It hit its target over 300 kilometres away in four minutes and three seconds, reaching speeds of roughly 4,050 kilometres per hour — more than three times the speed of sound.

Fired from US-made High Mobility Artillery Rocket Systems (HIMARS), the PrSM can strike targets at distances of up to 500 kilometres with precision — a significant leap from the Australian Army's previous long-range strike range of just 30 kilometres.

At a press conference at Mount Bundey on Friday, Defence Industry Minister Pat Conroy said the new weapon marked the day the "Australian Army enters the missile age".

"This is all about extending deterrence in the Indo-Pacific, all about signalling to any potential adversary that pain can be inflicted — all about deterring war through strength," he said.

Developed for the United States Army, the PrSM was sent to Australia last month as part of a $310 million deal with the US.

The deal locks in Australian access to munitions, technological advancements and the option for future domestic manufacturing and maintenance.

The missile launch was conducted as part of Exercise Talisman Sabre, a joint military exercise involving more than 40,000 military personnel from 19 nations, including the US.

This year marks the largest iteration of the exercise since it began in 2005 as a way to practice maritime operations, air combat and live-fire exercises with international partners.

On Friday, the Secretary of the United States Army, Dan Driscoll, was more forthright in his assessment of where the message of deterrence was aimed at.

"President Trump, [the United States Secretary of Defence] Pete Hegseth and the rest of the Pentagon team have been very clear that our pacing threat is China," he said.

"We are actively designing our army so that we are capable of responding to any threat from China."

While the US Army's chief of staff, General Randy George, did not respond directly to questions about an imminent threat, or whether there were enhanced capabilities in China, he said keeping up with technological advancements was "what keeps us up at night".

"What we are trying to do is to transform as rapidly as possible," he said.

Alex Miller, the US Army's chief technology officer, said the PrSM's high speed halved the amount of warning time given to a potential enemy.

He also said while the missile's explosion would not "level a city", its precision, driven by advanced navigation, was what made it lethal.

"When you think about having six to seven minutes rather than 15 to 20 minutes, that's a lot less time for [a target] to pack up and roll out if they learn that they are being shot at," he said.

In a statement from Mr Conroy's office, a spokesperson said future upgrades to the PrSM could include an extended strike range of over 1,000 kilometres, improved sensors and novel warheads.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-07-26/australia-army-tests-precision-strike-missile-in-mount-bundey-nt/105576916

https://x.com/TalismanSabre/status/1949273606065733863

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109423

File: fbd02268a5dae0c⋯.jpg (238.4 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: c3125dc948697a8⋯.jpg (318.86 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 8c77b54ad806e48⋯.jpg (560.29 KB,1200x800,3:2,Clipboard.jpg)

File: d58038ccd24c003⋯.jpg (552.1 KB,1200x800,3:2,Clipboard.jpg)

File: be14bf329cbe3e1⋯.jpg (2.79 MB,4096x3745,4096:3745,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23388478 (271021ZJUL25) Notable: Defence chiefs meet in Darwin as allies wrap-up Talisman Sabre – As Exercise Talisman Sabre concludes its mainland component, Defence chiefs from 17 participating nations have met in Darwin to discuss the exercise’s outcomes. The largest Talisman Sabre since its inception in 2005, the exercise involved 43,000 military personnel, 32 ships, 297 aircraft, and 32 million kilograms of cargo moved across the country. Vice Admiral Justin Jones highlighted the objectives of the exercise, including the value of allies, testing Australia’s military posture, and rehearsing combined joint war fighting. Key participants included personnel from the United States, the UK, New Zealand, and Japan.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109224

>>109320

Defence chiefs meet in Darwin as allies wrap-up Talisman Sabre

Allies have praised the benefits of Talisman Sabre as Defence chiefs prepare to meet in Darwin.

Camden Smith - July 26, 2025

With the mainland component of Exercise Talisman Sabre wrapping-up ahead of its conclusion in Papua New Guinea next week, Defence top brass have released details of the exercise that was one of the largest of its type in Australia.

Vice Admiral Justin Jones, Australian Defence Force chief of joint operations, said Defence command travelled to Darwin this weekend to participate in a Conclave featuring military top brass from the 17 participating nations, including Australia.

The largest Talisman Sabre since it was first held in 2005 Vice Admiral Jones said at its peak this month, 43,000 ADF and overseas military personnel were in Australia taking part.

Equipment included 32 ships, eight of which were amphibious, an aircraft carrier each from the UK and United States, 297 aircraft that flew 2000 sorites, and also moved 32 million kilograms of cargo around the country. As well, more than 16,000 military passengers were moved around the country.

Vice Admiral Jones said there had been six live fires, including Friday’s Precision Strike Missile (PrSM) launch from Mt Bundey military base to Bradshaw and before that, the US launching a mid-range capability Typhon missile from Bradshaw.

Talisman Sabre is a tactical field training exercise by nature, but over an extraordinary geographic scale,” Vice Admiral Jones said.

“(It’s) 5300km from Christmas Island in the north-western approaches to Australia through the southern New South Wales coast, where we were doing firings with our Japanese colleagues.”

A “continental scale” activity, he said this year’s exercise had three main objectives.

“The first was the value of allies and partners and the messaging that comes with that,” he said.

“The second was to test our posture, and by that I mean force-flowing those people and assets into the country and around the country.

“Most importantly, combined joint war fighting rehearsal, and we’ve done exactly that across the northeast and north of Australia over the last two weeks.

“Those 19 participants are all like-minded, they’re friends, allies and partners who have a shared vision for our region, if not our world, for a peaceful, stable, prosperous region based on international law.

“It’s clear we live in unstable times, and our own National Defence Strategy made that very point about strategic competition in our region. I’ll leave it to others to judge what has brought 17 nations to Australia, but in my view it’s a willingness to operate with like-mindeds and the value that comes from that.”

Deputy Chief of Joint Operations, Major General Hugh McAslan said 440 New Zealand Defence Force personnel were participating including a frigate, an aviation detachment, a land combat element and pre-existing in-beds around Australia.

“When you look north out of Australia and when you look north out of New Zealand, you see two very different environments,” he said. “Both those environments are absolutely intertwined, into each country’s national interest

“We’re trading nations, we’re maritime nations and we require that rules based system to function for our prosperity. Those interests are pretty common, and that’s what we need for our prosperity for our two countries, but for our region.”

The Exercise Talisman Sabre Conclave involving the chiefs of joint operations or their equivalents from participating defence forces, begins in Darwin and concludes on Monday.

https://www.ntnews.com.au/business/nt-business/defence-chiefs-meet-in-darwin-as-allies-wrapup-talisman-sabre/news-story/3a6a6e78a96c4e391f5c47b8e0651156

https://x.com/hqjoc/status/1948968956917592493

https://x.com/hqjoc/status/1949268226241654871

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109424

File: 63d9f30ec53de8a⋯.jpg (4.64 MB,4032x3024,4:3,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23388521 (271040ZJUL25) Notable: Talisman Sabre -Magic Sword- https://qalerts.pub/?q=Operation+Specialists - https://qalerts.pub/?q=magic''''

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109224

>>109320

Information Operations:Talisman Sabre’s new advantage takes shape

Major Cameron Jamieson - 24 JULY 2025

Amid the backrooms of Exercise Talisman Sabre 2025, a significant first occurrence is highlighting the trust between the exercise partners.

Twelve partner nations have joined to create the first-ever Multinational Information Operations Centre (MIOC).

Created for the Talisman Sabre exercise series, the MIOC weaves together the complex relationships of national authorities needed to create a cohesive capability.

Information Operations (IO) within the Indo-Pacific area of operation uses information-related capabilities and activities that layer effects while protecting friendly forces and operations.

Ultimately, IO aims to gain a competitive edge by shaping the information environment and influencing perceptions and actions.

With over 80 personnel from 12 nations working in the MIOC, a key achievement has been the integration of the many national perspectives.

Canadian Army planning officer Major Kai Hesser said the MIOC demonstrated the determination of multiple nations to work together.

“This allows us to form a cohesive and unified perspective, and effectively plan information operations,” Major Hesser said.

“Within this one capability, we can address the opinions and concerns of our partners, and demonstrate to an international audience our strategic partnership and resolve.”

Through military manoeuvre and unique specialised capabilities, the MIOC has the ability to project and deliver their multinational effects across vast distances.

Integrated with agreed objectives, the MIOC can be proactive rather than reactive, enabling manoeuvrability in the information space, a domain that is in a constant state of evolution.

The origins of IO predates the introduction of the written word.

Inevitably, all military actions, whether implied or actual, have used information operations to deter military action or give the victor a winning advantage.

In the 21st century, IO uses a diverse range of activities, including cyber, space, operational security, signature management, and electronic magnetic operations to create desired effects.

It is a growth industry, with nations seeking to build their own capabilities as they understand the impacts of IO in contemporary conflicts and during peacetime military operations.

The MIOC’s US Army co-director, Lieutenant Colonel Katherine Redding, said a key feature of the MIOC had been the involvement of global partners, including European nations.

“This creation of the MIOC is a significant achievement, as it has demonstrated the trust that partner nations have to work in an environment that includes unique perspectives and ideas that can be turned into state-of-the-art capabilities and innovative approaches,” Lieutenant Colonel Redding said.

“This global partnership underlines the emerging interest with which IO is taken by professional militaries due the rapid evolution of technology.

“It also addresses the requirement to increase education across the force, so we can identify multinational solutions to persistent threats in the information environment.”

Lieutenant Colonel Redding said information operations were very complex to understand and grasp.

“Every country has their own definitions and understanding of the capability that must be fully coordinated so that it can be properly planned and integrated into all military operations,” she said.

“The movement of forces, their actions, inactions, and their capabilities all tell a story. It’s the MIOC’s responsibility to tell the story that brings all of these events together to create opportunities to project a unified narrative that properly communicates the interest of all the participating countries.”

Australian Army MIOC co-director, Lieutenant Colonel Peter Power, said the success of the MIOC could be found in the diversity of the nations involved.

“Every nation’s unique perspective is allowing us to better understand cultures, interests, and topics that resonate in the information environment,” Lieutenant Colonel Power said.

“The contribution of each nation demonstrates the strength of our partnerships and of our willingness to co-operate.

“We look forward to Exercise Talisman Sabre 27 and the opportunities it will provide.”

https://www.defence.gov.au/news-events/news/2025-07-24/talisman-sabres-new-advantage-takes-shape

>Talisman Sabre

MAGIC SWORD

https://qalerts.pub/?q=Operation+Specialists

https://qalerts.pub/?q=magic

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109425

File: 1e61af25b8e0866⋯.jpg (203.11 KB,1616x1080,202:135,Clipboard.jpg)

File: ba9984d717c2084⋯.jpg (111.29 KB,1273x851,1273:851,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 51efc3343b0b81b⋯.jpg (457.32 KB,2560x1440,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23392664 (280941ZJUL25) Notable: NSW premier resists calls for pro-Palestinian 'March for Humanity' on Sydney Harbour Bridge – NSW Premier Chris Minns has opposed a proposed pro-Palestinian march across the Sydney Harbour Bridge, citing concerns over public safety and potential chaos. The Palestine Action Group Sydney planned the march for August 3 to protest the "extraordinary situation" in Gaza, highlighting the impact of Israeli restrictions and humanitarian concerns. Minns argued that the bridge, a critical infrastructure, could not accommodate such a protest without causing significant disruption. The group has called for more time to plan and support the march, while the NSW opposition and police have suggested alternative protest routes.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109251

>>109264

>>109388

NSW premier resists calls for pro-Palestinian 'March for Humanity' on Sydney Harbour Bridge

Digby Werthmuller - 28 July 2025

The NSW premier has opposed calls for a mass pro-Palestinian march across Sydney Harbour Bridge, saying he "cannot allow Sydney to descend into chaos".

Palestine Action Group Sydney proposed the march for Sunday, August 3, to address the "extraordinary situation" in Gaza.

It said it chose the bridge as "Australia's most iconic symbol" to send a "powerful message to the world".

"Thousands of aid trucks remain stranded at crossings outside Gaza, as Israel starves the Palestinian population," a spokesperson said.

More than 100 humanitarian agencies have warned the strip was facing mass starvation due to Israeli restrictions on essentials and aid.

Palestinian health authorities said 133 people had died from starvation in the last week, including 87 children.

Rallies in support of the Palestinian people have drawn thousands across the country since the Hamas terrorist attacks on Israel on October 7, 2023.

Israel has denied its actions have caused a starvation crisis, and instead blames Hamas for creating the situation.

'Nothing chaotic about people marching for peace'

Premier Chris Minns said the NSW government could not "support the protest of this scale and nature" on the bridge on a week's notice.

"The bridge is one of the most critical pieces of infrastructure in our city — used every day by thousands of people," he said.

"Unplanned disruption risks not only significant inconvenience, but real public safety concerns.

"We cannot allow Sydney to descend into chaos."

Palestine Action Group Sydney said there was "nothing chaotic about people marching for peace, to stop mass starvation".

"If the premier says we need more time to plan such an event, then would he agree to support the 'March for Humanity' a week later?

"We call on NSW authorities to work with us to plan this event and stand on the right side of history."

A spokesperson for the group added it had lodged a form with police for its intentions with the "March for Humanity".

NSW Police said it was aware of the proposed planned assembly and was "consulting relevant stakeholders".

Mr Minns added that the force "were in discussions with organisers about other routes they can take" and were "working to ensure community safety is upheld".

'Plenty' of alternatives, opposition leader says

Opposition Leader Mark Speakman acknowledged the situation was tragic but said the bridge "belongs to everyone".

"I can understand people have sincere and passionate views about what is happening in the Middle East, which whichever way you look at it, it is a tragedy," Mr Speakman said.

"The failure to release hostages is a tragedy, the initial terrorist attack is a tragedy … and what is happening to innocent people in Gaza is a tragedy."

But Mr Speakman said there were "plenty" of alternative ways to protest and "other venues where the protesters can march".

"Absolutely they should not be taking over the harbour bridge," he said.

NSW Greens MP Sue Higginson said on Monday the party endorsed the march and that it was "time for action".

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-07-28/nsw-pro-palestine-march-sydney-harbour-bridge/105582106

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109426

File: 42aaa7cf7fd0999⋯.jpg (269.81 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: c9618c4da211d90⋯.jpg (248.94 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23392689 (280953ZJUL25) Notable: Sydney Harbour Bridge protest showdown looms after Chris Minns’ intervention – Premier Chris Minns has opposed a planned pro-Palestinian march across the Sydney Harbour Bridge, citing public safety concerns and the potential for chaos. Palestine Action Group Sydney intends to hold the "March for Humanity" on August 3 to protest the suffering in Gaza. The Premier's opposition has sparked defiance from organizers, with spokesperson Josh Lees saying they would proceed with the march if negotiations fail. While some, including Greens MP Sue Higginson, support the protest, others, like Opposition Leader Mark Speakman, argue that alternative protest locations should be used.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109425

Sydney Harbour Bridge protest showdown looms after Chris Minns’ intervention

JAMES DOWLING - 28 July 2025

1/2

Pro-Palestine activists barred from marching across the Sydney Harbour Bridge by Premier Chris Minns plan to defy any orders should negotiations with the state government and NSW police fall through.

Mr Minns said on Monday that he would block and divert any planned protest on Sydney Harbour Bridge after the Palestine Action Group announced it had requested the state government divert traffic to allow the “March for Humanity” on Sunday, August 3, in protest against “the horrific suffering in Gaza”.

Mr Minns said the NSW government “cannot support a protest of this scale and nature taking place on the Sydney Harbour Bridge, especially with one week’s notice”.

“The bridge is one of the most critical pieces of infrastructure in our city – used every day by thousands of people,” he said.

“Unplanned disruption risks not only significant inconvenience, but real public safety concerns. We cannot allow Sydney to descend into chaos.

“NSW police are in discussions with organisers about other routes they can take and are working to ensure community safety is upheld.”

But Palestine Action Group spokesman Josh Lees told The Australian the march would seek to go ahead regardless, although he did not want to pre-empt negotiations with police.

“Thankfully, it’s not all up to the Premier to decide if the people of NSW can protest,” he said.

Asked if protesters would march if negotiations failed, he said: “Yes, but it’s premature to discuss that. We still haven’t heard from the police.”

Executive Council of Australian Jewry co-chair Alex Ryvchin said the protest would be “sullying another Australian icon” and urged the state government to stand firm.

“These very sorts of protests brought such shame and disgrace to our city at the foot of one of our other iconic landmarks not so long ago,” Mr Ryvchin said. “These protesters disgraced our country at the Opera House and dealt a blow to Australian decency from which we’re still reeling. The Premier is right to stop them from sullying another Australian icon.

“The last thing we need is another spectacle like that.

“We’ve seen the tenor, the mood, the slogans of these protests become progressively more aggressive, more vitriolic, more hateful and more unlawful in many cases. So, with this plan to take place here on our Harbour Bridge, there’s every chance that things will escalate further.

“This is one of our most iconic landmarks. It’s the beating heart of our city. We don’t need it sullied with this extremism that’s been ripping our society apart.

“Australians are sick of the cost, the disruptions and the extremism that come from these protests. This is the time to enforce our laws and ensure our city is open to everyone.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109427

File: ec0731a191de8a1⋯.jpg (751.8 KB,5000x3333,5000:3333,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 236d07909d1c77f⋯.jpg (1.27 MB,5000x3333,5000:3333,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23392708 (280959ZJUL25) Notable: Bill to criminalise AI child abuse apps to be introduced to parliament – Independent MP Kate Chaney will introduce a bill criminalising the use of AI tools designed to create child sexual abuse material. The bill responds to the urgent need for legislation, as current laws fail to address the use of AI in generating illegal material. The proposed bill creates offences for downloading or distributing such tools, with penalties of up to 15 years in prison. Ms Chaney argues that these tools allow for the on-demand creation of abuse material, making police work more challenging and increasing risks for children.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Bill to criminalise AI child abuse apps to be introduced to parliament

Jake Evans - 28 July 2025

1/2

A bill to criminalise the use of AI tools purpose-built to create child sexual abuse material is set to be introduced to parliament.

Independent MP Kate Chaney, who will introduce the bill, says the urgent issue cannot wait for the government's wider response to artificial intelligence.

While it is an offence to possess or share child abuse material, there is no criminal prohibition on downloading or distributing the wave of emerging AI generators designed to create the illegal material.

The tools are becoming easier to access online, with some of the most popular visited millions of times.

Their spread is diverting police resources and allowing material to be created offline, where it is harder to track.

A roundtable convened last week to address the issue recommended swift action to make the tools illegal, prompting Ms Chaney's bill.

"[This] clearly needs to be done urgently and I can't see why we need to wait to respond to this really significant and quite alarming issue," Ms Chaney said.

"I recognise the challenges of regulating AI — the technology is changing so fast it's hard to even come up with a workable definition of AI — but while we are working on that holistic approach, there are gaps in our existing legislation we can plug to address the highest-risk-use cases like this, so we can continue to build trust in AI."

Ms Chaney said she had met with Attorney-General Michelle Rowland's office, who she said recognised there was a gap in the law.

Tools enable 'on-demand, unlimited' abuse material, Chaney warns

The MP for Curtin's bill would create a new offence for using a carriage service to download, access, supply or facilitate technologies that are designed to create child abuse material.

A new offence for scraping or distributing data with the intention of training or creating those tools would also be created.

The offences would carry a maximum 15-year term of imprisonment.

A public defence would be available for law enforcement, intelligence agencies and others with express authorisation to be able to investigate child abuse cases.

"There are a few reasons we need this," Ms Chaney said.

"These tools enable the on-demand, unlimited creation of this type of material, which means perpetrators can train AI tools with images of a particular child, delete the offending material so they can't be detected, and then still be able to generate material with word prompts.

"It also makes police work more challenging. It is [getting] harder to identify real children who are victims.

"And every AI abuse image starts with photos of a real child, so a child is harmed somewhere in the process."

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109428

File: e222d2f809a1e32⋯.jpg (879.35 KB,1920x1440,4:3,Clipboard.jpg)

File: c195ec9ff10c4d6⋯.jpg (2.87 MB,5000x3750,4:3,Clipboard.jpg)

File: b1fb15255954c72⋯.jpg (361.38 KB,1920x1080,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 561769df4a77308⋯.jpg (685.11 KB,1098x1401,366:467,Clipboard.jpg)

File: f2869925f04df96⋯.jpg (145.03 KB,750x475,30:19,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23392738 (281005ZJUL25) Notable: Hong Kong police issue arrest warrants for foreign nationals including Australian citizen Feng Chongyi – Hong Kong police have issued arrest warrants for 19 foreign nationals, including Australian citizen Feng Chongyi, accusing them of national security crimes. The individuals, involved in pro-democracy activities, are part of what the police call a "subversive organisation" named Hong Kong Parliament. Feng, a vocal critic of China, dismissed the warrant as "ridiculous," stating it reflected the loss of Hong Kong's autonomy under Chinese rule. Australia has strongly condemned the warrants, with Foreign Minister Penny Wong reaffirming Australia's objections to Hong Kong's national security laws.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109321

>>109337

>>109397

Hong Kong police issue arrest warrants for foreign nationals including Australian citizen Feng Chongyi

Georgia Roberts and Gavin Coote - 26 Jul 2025

An Australian man has discovered he is wanted by Hong Kong authorities via messaging platform WhatsApp.

Feng Chongyi is among 19 foreign nationals who Hong Kong police have imposed bounties on, accusing them of national security crimes.

According to Hong Kong police, the activists, who also include UK citizens, worked for what the force called a "subversive organisation" named Hong Kong Parliament, a pro-democracy non-government group.

A reward of $HK200,000 ($38,000) each has been offered for 15 of the activists, while the four others were already wanted for $HK1 million ($194,038).

The 19 arrest warrants for the activists follow political unrest and ongoing, at times violent, protests in Hong Kong, which have quietened since Beijing imposed sweeping national security laws in 2020.

Dr Feng, who in 2017 was detained in China for a week and interrogated by authorities, described the arrest warrant as "ridiculous".

But he said he did "not take it as a big deal" because he did not plan to return to mainland China or Hong Kong.

"This action shows the world the brutality of the Chinese communist regime. It also reminds the world that Hong Kong has been completely controlled by China," he said.

"The autonomy is gone, basic liberties protected by law [are] gone, they've completely destroyed a beautiful city — it's so sad."

While Dr Feng is not originally from Hong Kong, he has been heavily involved in pro-democracy efforts, with local authorities citing his participation in a Hong Kong electoral organising committee as the reason for his arrest warrant.

In an annex by the Hong Kong Police Force, authorities accused him of "intent to overthrow the system of the People's Republic of China".

Dr Feng — a friend of imprisoned Australian writer Yang Hengjun, who is awaiting a death sentence in China — said he had joined the organising committee because he has many friends in Hong Kong who want democracy.

He said he was relieved Australia's extradition treaty with Hong Kong was currently suspended.

Australia strongly objects to arrest warrants

Condemnation of the arrest warrants has poured in from politicians.

Australian Foreign Affairs Minister Penny Wong took to social media platform X (formerly Twitter) to voice her strong objection to the warrants for pro-democracy Australian activists.

"Freedom of expression and assembly are essential to our democracy," Senator Wong said.

"We have consistently expressed our strong objections to China and Hong Kong on the broad and extraterritorial application of Hong Kong's national security legislation, and we will continue to do so"

Opposition spokesperson for foreign affairs, Michaelia Cash, said the Coalition had serious concerns about Hong Kong authorities' issuing of arrest warrants.

"We fundamentally believe in free speech. It is an essential element of our democracy," she said in a statement.

UK Foreign Secretary David Lammy, who is currently in Australia, said this sort of interference in UK affairs was "totally, totally unacceptable".

"We will stand up to it, as you would expect us to," he told a crowd in Sydney, during an address at the Lowy Institute on Saturday.

According to reporting by Agence France-Presse, the bounties announced by Hong Kong police are viewed as largely symbolic, as those affected live overseas in nations unlikely to extradite political activists to Hong Kong or China.

According to the Hong Kong Police Force's website, as of Friday, there were 34 people wanted by the agency for national security offences, including secession, subversion, or foreign collusion.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-07-26/australian-citizens-wanted-by-hong-kong-authorities-feng-chongyi/105576958

https://www.police.gov.hk/ppp_en/06_appeals_public/nsc/index.html

https://www.police.gov.hk/ppp_en/06_appeals_public/nsc/detail.html?id=20250002

https://x.com/SenatorWong/status/1948899044505649620

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109429

File: 47c5b73d88e806a⋯.jpg (146.24 KB,1200x720,5:3,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23392743 (281008ZJUL25) Notable: HKSAR govt opposes smears of US, Canada and Australia against lawful enforcement actions on 19 individuals linked to subversive organization"The Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (HKSAR) on Sunday strongly opposed and disapproved of smears with distorted facts by government officials and politicians from countries like the US, Canada and Australia, as well as anti-China organizations, on HKSAR's lawful act to pursue wanted persons endangering national security absconding from Hong Kong... Absconders should not think they can evade criminal liability by absconding from Hong Kong. Ultimately, they will be liable for their acts constituting serious offences endangering national security and be punished by the law." – The Global Times.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109428

HKSAR govt opposes smears of US, Canada and Australia against lawful enforcement actions on 19 individuals linked to subversive organization

Global Times - Jul 27, 2025

The Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (HKSAR) on Sunday strongly opposed and disapproved of smears with distorted facts by government officials and politicians from countries like the US, Canada and Australia, as well as anti-China organizations, on HKSAR's lawful act to pursue wanted persons endangering national security absconding from Hong Kong.

Not only did such foreign government officials and politicians, as well as anti-China organizations, turned a blind eye to illegal acts of criminals, but also deliberately smeared and spread irresponsible remarks, in an attempt to mislead the public, about the measures and actions taken by the HKSAR government in accordance with the law, read the statement released by the HKSAR government on Sunday.

The National Security Department of the Hong Kong Police Force issued wanted notices on Friday for 19 individuals involved in subversive organization "Hong Kong Parliament," including wanted fugitives Yuan Gongyi and Ho Leung-mau Victor for suspected of violating the national security law for Hong Kong.

The HKSAR government's Sunday statement was made in response to irresponsible remarks made by countries including the US, Canada and Australia, which attempted to smear the arrest warrant.

The statement said the Hong Kong Police Force has the responsibility to pursue, in accordance with the law, persons suspected of committing offences under the Hong Kong National Security Law (HKNSL) outside Hong Kong.

In the statement, the HKSAR government spokesman emphasized, "Absconders should not think they can evade criminal liability by absconding from Hong Kong. Ultimately, they will be liable for their acts constituting serious offences endangering national security and be punished by the law. No country or organization should harbor criminals nor try to exonerate these people with different excuses."

"The Constitution and the Basic Law steadfastly safeguard the rights and freedoms enjoyed by Hong Kong people. Any attempt by foreign countries or external forces to undermine Hong Kong's situation will only expose their own weakness and faulty arguments and be doomed to fail. The HKSAR Government will continue to unwaveringly discharge its duty in safeguarding national security," the spokesman said via statement.

https://www.globaltimes.cn/page/202507/1339389.shtml

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109430

File: a7170eee8541185⋯.jpg (353.13 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 96eb0f1ac2f8e21⋯.jpg (425.06 KB,2048x1536,4:3,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23392787 (281022ZJUL25) Notable: UK to China: Britain will be a strong military presence in the Indo-Pacific with our Australian allies – UK officials, including Foreign Secretary David Lammy and Defence Secretary John Healey, have committed Britain to upholding international laws in the Indo-Pacific, emphasizing defence cooperation with Australia. At Exercise Talisman Sabre 2025, the UK highlighted its military presence and support for the AUKUS partnership, sending its aircraft carrier to Australia for joint exercises. This move reinforces the UK’s pledge to support freedom, security, and prosperity in the region, despite growing concerns over Chinese aggression. Lammy and Healey stressed that these efforts are vital in countering global threats and maintaining peace.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109299

>>109316

>>109405

>>109224

>>109320

UK to China: Britain will be a strong military presence in the Indo-Pacific with our Australian allies

GEOFF CHAMBERS and RICHARD FERGUSON - 27 July 2025

1/2

British Prime Minister Keir Starmer’s top security officials have declared Britain will always uphold “international laws that protect our way of life” in the Indo-Pacific, amid concerns over rising Chinese aggression and military expansion, as they elevate ­defence, AUKUS nuclear sub­marines and military technology as “bedrocks” of the relationship with Australia.

Joining more than 3000 British armed forces personnel on Sunday in the Northern Territory, where 35,000 troops from 19 countries are participating in Exercise Talisman Sabre, British Foreign Secretary David Lammy and Defence Secretary John Healey warned that “conflicts and aggressive ­autocracies” are on the rise.

The senior UK Labour ministers also committed Britain to ­“always stand as the closest of ­allies (with Australia)” to defend freedom, prosperity and the rules-based order.

In a move that will draw the ire of Beijing, Britain has sent one of its carrier groups to dock in Australia for the first time in decades, with the $6bn-plus aircraft carrier HMS Prince of Wales conducting exercises with Australian and US defence personnel and pilots.

As Exercise Talisman Sabre is closely monitored by Xi Jinping’s People’s Liberation Army, Mr Lammy and Mr Healey have written in The Australian that the ­largest ever Australia and US-led defence exercise ensured soldiers from different countries could “work together … in a massive display of military deterrence”.

Mr Lammy and Mr Healey, who were in Darwin with Foreign Minister Penny Wong and ­Defence Minister Richard Marles after holding formal AUKMIN talks in Sydney on Friday, wrote that “in today’s increasingly ­volatile world, with conflicts and ­aggressive autocracies on the rise, partnerships between like-minded democracies are vital for protecting our shared values and way of life”.

“The UK’s huge presence in this (Talisman Sabre) exercise was made possible by our carrier strike group visiting Darwin. A formidable formation of naval and air assets demonstrating the power of alliances – with warships from Canada, Norway, Spain and New Zealand. These exercises aren’t just symbolic. They strengthen ­regional stability and improve our forces’ ability to act together,” Mr Lammy and Mr Healey wrote.

“Our security co-operation doesn’t end there. We’re extending our naval personnel exchange program to include more personnel and more vessels. Our Five Eyes relationship keeps us safe through world-leading intelligence sharing. And we continue to jointly train Ukrainian armed forces, while UK personnel are set to serve aboard Australian Wedgetail aircraft that will monitor Ukrainian supply lines.

“From the battlefields of northern Europe to the frontlines of Korea and Afghanistan, our two nations have stood together when it mattered most. Today, we face a new era of threat, which demands a new era of Australian-British partnership.”

With the British government moving over the weekend to support the AUKUS pact for “50 years” despite a Trump administration review into the agreement, Mr Lammy and Mr Healey’s ­comments are the latest sign of a cooling attitude towards China across Europe.

Mr Healey on Sunday said the high volume of British trade going through the Pacific and his belief that the British military should be “NATO first, but not NATO only” were also key factors in Britain’s increasing focus on the region. “We secure peace through strength,” he said in Darwin.

Just a week after Anthony ­Albanese spent six days in China trying to grow ties with Mr Xi and promote more trade with China, Mr Marles in Darwin said the Talisman Sabre exercises showed there were not “multipolar” world orders, but one set of global rules.

“This is an exercise which is about – from an Australian ­national interest point of view – building Australian capability,” he said. “And we really appreciate the presence of the UK here. ­Obviously, the Prince of Wales being here.

“I guess what comes to mind, in a sense, is the words of (French) President (Emmanuel) Macron recently when he was speaking at the Shangri-La Dialogue. And he said there’s not multiple world rules-based orders – there is one rules-based order. And it applies right round the world. And all of us are engaged in upholding the rules-based order. We live in a ­global community.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109431

File: e9537065dfcfb29⋯.jpg (154.46 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: b95289efba94583⋯.jpg (343.91 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23392811 (281030ZJUL25) Notable: An old friendship is ready for new era of security threats"In today’s increasingly volatile world, with conflicts and aggressive autocracies on the rise, partnerships between like-minded democracies are vital for protecting our shared values and way of life. Australia and the UK enjoy a strong and growing trade and investment relationship, worth close to $50bn annually. ... But it is defence that remains the bedrock of our relationship. Our AUKUS partnership with the United States is our most strategically significant defence agreement in generations, and last week we took decisive steps to fast-track delivery. ... These exercises aren’t just symbolic. They strengthen regional stability and improve our forces’ ability to act together." – David Lammy and John Healey, The Australian

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109299

>>109405

>>109224

>>109320

>>109430

COMMENTARY: An old friendship is ready for new era of security threats

David Lammy and John Healey - 27 July 2025

As the Wallabies and Lions battle tooth and nail on the pitch, we are in Australia signing agreements that will make both nations more secure and prosperous.

In today’s increasingly volatile world, with conflicts and aggressive autocracies on the rise, partnerships between like-minded democracies are vital for protecting our shared values and way of life. Australia and the UK enjoy a strong and growing trade and investment relationship, worth close to $50bn annually.

We’re bringing the expertise gained from building London’s award-winning Elizabeth Line to Sydney’s Metro renewal.

We’ve agreed to deepen co-operation on industrial policy, global free trade, artificial intelligence and cyber security to further boost and protect our economies – our high-level meeting between foreign and defence ministers.

AUKMIN was first set up in 2006 when Tony Blair was prime minister and we were both ministers early in our careers. Since then, our relationship has gone from strength to strength.

But it is defence that remains the bedrock of our relationship. Our AUKUS partnership with the United States is our most strategically significant defence agreement in generations, and last week we took decisive steps to fast-track delivery.

We re-established the Defence Industry Dialogue to boost military technology development and strengthen procurement.

And most significantly, we’ve signed the Treaty of Geelong to bolster AUKUS and accelerate delivery of the SSN-AUKUS fleet of nuclear-powered, conventionally armed submarines.

SSN-AUKUS will be the largest, most advanced, most powerful attack submarines ever operated by either the Royal Australian Navy or Royal Navy. They will help us protect our vital trade routes and sovereign borders, and support thousands of jobs in Australia and the UK.

Just as it strengthens our collective security, our investment in AUKUS will be an engine for growth across our two nations. It is creating 10,000 jobs in Adelaide, 3000 in Perth, and thousands more in supply chains across the country.

While we’ve been strengthening our political and economic ties in recent days, our armed forces have been training side by side across Australia.

More than 3000 UK personnel are taking part in Exercise Talisman Sabre, the largest military exercise ever staged in Australia, with a total of 35,000 personnel from 19 nations sharpening their ability to work together, in a massive display of military deterrence.

The UK’s huge presence in this exercise was made possible by our Carrier Strike Group visiting Darwin. A formidable formation of naval and air assets demonstrating the power of alliances – with warships from Canada, Norway, Spain and New Zealand.

These exercises aren’t just symbolic. They strengthen regional stability and improve our forces’ ability to act together.

And our security co-operation doesn’t end there. We’re extending our naval personnel exchange program to include more personnel and more vessels. Our Five Eyes relationship keeps us safe through world-leading intelligence sharing. And we continue to jointly train the Ukrainian armed forces, while UK personnel are set to serve aboard Australian Wedgetail aircraft that will monitor Ukrainian supply lines.

From the battlefields of northern Europe to the frontlines of Korea and Afghanistan, our two nations have stood together when it mattered most. Today, we face a new era of threat, which demands a new era of Australian-British partnership.

Through AUKUS, through our Carrier Strike Group deployment and through strengthened military co-operation, our nations are leading efforts to maintain a free and open Indo-Pacific and uphold the international laws that protect our way of life.

Our alliance will deliver the “defence dividend” that sits alongside our strengthened security: creating high-skilled jobs and world-leading technologies, and reinvigorating our proud industrial base in both nations.

We will always remain fierce sporting competitors, and we will always stand as the closest of allies: defending our freedoms, our prosperity, and the rules-based international order that underpins both.

David Lammy is UK Foreign Secretary and John Healey is UK Defence Secretary.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/commentary/an-old-friendship-is-ready-for-new-era-of-security-threats/news-story/ff6f2a0a00b3041cb0c7386f18fc27f8

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109432

File: 9dd93e834bec0f1⋯.jpg (400.99 KB,750x989,750:989,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23392847 (281040ZJUL25) Notable: Talisman Sabre Tweets: - We have reached the end of the Australian component of EXTS25 as activities now move to Papua New Guinea. This is the first time that a component of Exercise Talisman Sabre has been hosted outside of Australia and will conclude with a closing ceremony on 4 August. We thank all those who have participated to date and supported Talisman Sabre 25 and we look forward to seeing you all at Talisman Sabre 27. #ts25 #talismansabre #talismansabre25 #YourADF #StrongerTogether

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109224

>>109320

Talisman Sabre Tweets

We have reached the end of the Australian component of EXTS25 as activities now move to Papua New Guinea.

This is the first time that a component of Exercise Talisman Sabre has been hosted outside of Australia and will conclude with a closing ceremony on 4 August.

https://x.com/TalismanSabre/status/1949420479930110206

We thank all those who have participated to date and supported Talisman Sabre 25 and we look forward to seeing you all at Talisman Sabre 27.

#ts25 #talismansabre #talismansabre25 #YourADF #StrongerTogether

https://x.com/TalismanSabre/status/1949420489656717648

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109433

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23392867 (281046ZJUL25) Notable: Video: ADF | Talisman Sabre 2025 - Exercise Talisman Sabre 2025 is being conducted across Australia from 13 July to 04 August. More than 40,000 military personnel from 19 nations will participate in Talisman Sabre 2025, primarily in Queensland but also in Western Australia, the Northern Territory, New South Wales, and for the first time, offshore activities will be conducted in Papua New Guinea. Talisman Sabre is the largest Australia-US bilaterally planned, multilaterally conducted exercise and a key opportunity to work with likeminded partners from across the region and around the world. Canada, France, Fiji, Germany, India, Indonesia, Japan, Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Papua New Guinea, Philippines, Republic of Korea, Singapore, Thailand, Tonga the United Kingdom are all participating in Talisman Sabre 2025. Occurring every two years, Talisman Sabre reflects the closeness of our alliance and strength of our enduring military relationship with the United States and also our commitment to working with likeminded partners in the region. Now in its eleventh iteration, Talisman Sabre provides an opportunity to exercise our combined capabilities to conduct high-end, multi-domain warfare, to build and affirm our military-to-military ties and interoperability, and strengthen our strategic partnerships. - Defence Australia

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109224

>>109320

>>109432

ADF | Talisman Sabre 2025

Defence Australia

Jul 28, 2025

Exercise Talisman Sabre 2025 is being conducted across Australia from 13 July to 04 August.

More than 40,000 military personnel from 19 nations will participate in Talisman Sabre 2025, primarily in Queensland but also in Western Australia, the Northern Territory, New South Wales, and for the first time, offshore activities will be conducted in Papua New Guinea.

Talisman Sabre is the largest Australia-US bilaterally planned, multilaterally conducted exercise and a key opportunity to work with likeminded partners from across the region and around the world.

Canada, France, Fiji, Germany, India, Indonesia, Japan, Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Papua New Guinea, Philippines, Republic of Korea, Singapore, Thailand, Tonga the United Kingdom are all participating in Talisman Sabre 2025.

Occurring every two years, Talisman Sabre reflects the closeness of our alliance and strength of our enduring military relationship with the United States and also our commitment to working with likeminded partners in the region.

Now in its eleventh iteration, Talisman Sabre provides an opportunity to exercise our combined capabilities to conduct high-end, multi-domain warfare, to build and affirm our military-to-military ties and interoperability, and strengthen our strategic partnerships.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fEcnHy_IFQI

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109434

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23395092 (282041ZJUL25) Notable: An old friendship is ready for new era of security threats"In today’s increasingly volatile world, with conflicts and aggressive autocracies on the rise, partnerships between like-minded democracies are vital for protecting our shared values and way of life. Australia and the UK enjoy a strong and growing trade and investment relationship, worth close to $50bn annually. ... But it is defence that remains the bedrock of our relationship. Our AUKUS partnership with the United States is our most strategically significant defence agreement in generations, and last week we took decisive steps to fast-track delivery. ... These exercises aren’t just symbolic. They strengthen regional stability and improve our forces’ ability to act together." – David Lammy and John Healey, The Australian

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109431

Australia, UK to Sign 50-Year Treaty for Nuclear Submarines

By Swati Pandey Bloomberg July 25, 2025

Jul 24, 2025 (Bloomberg) –Australia and the UK will sign a landmark 50-year defense treaty on Saturday to underpin the construction of nuclear-powered submarines, senior ministers said following high-level talks in Sydney.

Framed as the most consequential bilateral agreement since Australia’s Federation in 1901, the pact underscores deepening defense ties between the historic partners against a backdrop of mounting global geopolitical volatility.

Both sides stressed that the treaty doesn’t impact the Aukus security partnership between Australia, the UK and the US — currently under review by the Trump administration.

Instead, the bilateral agreement, which will be signed in Geelong near Melbourne, “will very much underpin the development of Aukus,” Australia’s Defense Minister Richard Marles told a press conference next to Sydney Harbor on Friday. “It is a profoundly important treaty that we will sign tomorrow.”

Friday’s meeting is part of the Australia-United Kingdom Ministerial Consultations (AUKMIN). Marles and Foreign Minister Penny Wong are hosting UK Foreign Secretary David Lammy and Defence Secretary John Healey.

The deal is expected to be worth up to £20 billion ($27 billion) to the UK in exports over the next 25 years, the UK’s Foreign Office said in a statement on Friday.

The Times of London reported that under the deal, the UK will build up to a dozen attack submarines with both the Royal Navy and the Australian Navy operating the SSN-Aukus. It said the agreement is part of an effort to persuade the US to stick with the Aukus accord.

More than 21,000 people will work on the conventionally armed, nuclear-powered Aukus submarine program in the UK at its peak, the Foreign Office said. “This historic Treaty confirms our AUKUS commitment for the next half century,” Healey was quoted in the statement as saying.

Under the Aukus agreement signed in 2021, the US and the UK agreed to collaborate on providing Australia with a fleet of nuclear-powered submarines to ramp up Canberra’s defense capabilities in the face of growing strategic competition with China in the Indo-Pacific.

Both sides said they welcomed the US review as a chance to renew the Trump administration’s commitment to Aukus.

“We’re really confident about the progress of the Aukus project and the progress in respect of all three countries,” Marles said.

Under the terms of Aukus, Washington is initially due to sell a fleet of Virginia-class submarines to Canberra, with the first vessels expected to arrive in the early 2030s. The UK and Australia will then collaborate on designing and building a new model of nuclear-powered submarines known as the SSN-Aukus, with the first expected to be ready in the early 2040s.

However, the Pentagon has launched a review of the pact as the Trump administration looks to shift more responsibility to allies and ensure the US’s supply of warships. The review is aimed at making sure that allies contribute more to collective security and that America’s defense industrial base can meet its domestic needs.

On Sunday, the Australian and British defense and foreign ministers will visit the northern city of Darwin to observe the deployment of a UK Carrier Strike Group as part of Exercise Talisman Sabre 2025.

https://gcaptain.com/australia-uk-to-sign-50-year-treaty-for-nuclear-submarines/

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109435

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23397867 (290945ZJUL25) Notable: Video: Donald Trump drops another tariff bombshell that may hit Australia – US President Donald Trump has threatened to raise the baseline tariff rate on all US imports to “somewhere in the 15-20 per cent range,” ramping up pressure on the Albanese government to avoid even higher tariffs. Trade Minister Don Farrell reaffirmed Australia’s position, calling any tariffs unjustified and an act of economic self-harm. Health Minister Mark Butler pointed to volatility in US trade talks, particularly regarding pharmaceuticals. Trump confirmed he would soon notify countries of their new “world tariff” rate, which could impact Australian trade.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109274

>>109279

>>109280

Donald Trump drops another tariff bombshell that may hit Australia

NOAH YIM - 29 July 2025

US President Donald Trump has threatened to raise the baseline tariff rate on all US imports to “somewhere in the 15-20 per cent range”, dialling up pressure on the Albanese government to avoid being hit with even higher tariffs.

The government has pledged to stay the course in its diplomatic approach to tariffs.

“Our position is unchanged – any tariffs on Australian goods are unjustified and an act of economic self-harm,” a spokesman for Trade Minister Don Farrell said.

“We will continue to engage at all levels to advocate for the removal of all tariffs, in line with our free-trade agreement with the United States.”

Health Minister Mark Butler portrayed the latest threat as another update in volatile US trade talks, including in his own portfolio area, where the US has expressed grievances with the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme.

“The nature of some of these trade positions from the US administration – I’ve found that the position in relation to pharmaceuticals has changed a lot over the last couple of weeks – the nature, the timing, the scale of tariffs that might be imposed not just on Australia but on pharmaceutical imports to the US from anywhere in the world,” Mr Butler told ABC Radio National.

“So we’re trying to make sure that we have a sense of what the US administration is planning but continuing nonetheless to prosecute Australia’s national interest and reinforce the importance of free trade between our two countries which we’ve enjoyed since the free-trade agreement for more than 20 years.”

Mr Trump in Scotland said the tariff rate would be “somewhere in the 15-20 per cent range”.

“Probably one of those two numbers,” the President said.

He said he would soon notify countries of their new “world tariff” rate.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/donald-trump-drops-another-tariff-bombshell-that-may-hit-australia/news-story/2c328377cf925acc5678bbb81bc74927

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VwIMaFTo99g

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109436

File: b04730963fad603⋯.mp4 (7.57 MB,640x360,16:9,Clipboard.mp4)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23397881 (290953ZJUL25) Notable: Government scrambling for details after Trump threatens higher tariffs – Australian officials are scrambling to determine whether exports to the US will face tariffs of up to 20 per cent after US President Donald Trump's recent move to raise tariffs. Opposition leader Sussan Ley criticized Prime Minister Albanese for failing to secure a meeting with Trump, while Trade Minister Don Farrell reiterated Australia's stance against unjustified tariffs. Trump has hinted at a “world tariff” rate of 15-20 per cent but has not specified which countries will be affected. The Albanese government continues to engage with US counterparts, hoping to avoid an increase in tariffs before Trump’s August 1 deadline.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>>/qresearch/23372922

>>109435

Government scrambling for details after Trump threatens higher tariffs

Natassia Chrysanthos - July 29, 2025

1/2

Australian officials are scrambling to identify whether exports to the United States will be hit with tariffs of up to 20 per cent after Donald Trump’s move to increase import taxes sparked renewed focus on Prime Minister Anthony Albanese’s inability to secure a meeting with the president.

Trump’s indication he would impose tariffs between 15 and 20 per cent within days increases the political pressure on Albanese, who is yet to secure a face-to-face meeting with Trump or an exemption to the current 10 per cent tariffs on Australian goods entering the US.

Opposition leader Sussan Ley accused Albanese of being a “bystander” to the situation on Tuesday, as senior members of the government either downplayed the risk of a tariff increase or insisted Australia was continuing to engage closely with US counterparts.

“The government seems to be shrugging its shoulders as if there is nothing they can do to address the tariff situation,” Ley said.

“It is not good enough that all these months after Donald Trump became president … the vital meeting between Anthony Albanese and the president has not taken place.”

Trump floated his desire for a single tariff rate for the “rest of the world” at a press conference in Scotland on Monday (UK time), having recently announced trade deals with major economies, including Japan and the European Union.

While Trump did not name Australia as one of the countries to incur the higher tariff range, he made it clear he would not negotiate individual deals with all the remaining countries.

Australian exports are subject to a 10 per cent “baseline” tariff under a White House decision earlier this year, separate to higher tariffs on steel and aluminium. The Albanese government is seeking to avoid higher tariffs, but there has been no sign the countries will reach a deal before Trump’s August 1 deadline.

“It’s a matter of wait and see,” a senior Australian official said, speaking on condition of anonymity. Asked whether the government was expecting a 10, 15 or 20 per cent tariff, the official said: “We haven’t had that level of engagement.”

A spokesman for Trade Minister Don Farrell said Australia maintained its position that any tariffs on Australian goods were unjustified, against the countries’ free trade agreement, and an act of economic self-harm for the US.

Coalition trade spokesman Kevin Hogan said the latest developments underscored the significance of Albanese’s failure to secure an in-person meeting with Trump.

“He needs to go over there and … argue Australia’s case, but also to stand up for free trade across the globe, because the importance of it for us as a trading nation,” he said on Sky News.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109437

File: d0d2481daca6311⋯.jpg (1.53 MB,5834x3889,5834:3889,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 7efeb1c132485d6⋯.jpg (2.98 MB,5862x3908,3:2,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23397893 (291002ZJUL25) Notable: ‘Age, health’: Trump seeks urgent evidence from Murdoch in Epstein case – US President Donald Trump’s lawyers are seeking an urgent deposition from Rupert Murdoch in a defamation case related to Jeffrey Epstein, citing the media mogul’s age and health concerns. Trump is suing Murdoch, News Corp, and others over a 2003 birthday letter allegedly written by Trump for Epstein, which Trump denies. The lawsuit seeks $US10 billion in damages, with Trump’s legal team arguing that Murdoch’s involvement in editorial decisions and his recent health issues warrant expedited testimony. Murdoch, 94, resides over 100 miles from the court, raising concerns about his availability for trial.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109289

>>109355

>>109357

>>109358

‘Age, health’: Trump seeks urgent evidence from Murdoch in Epstein case

Michael Koziol - July 29, 2025

Washington: US President Donald Trump’s lawyers are seeking an urgent deposition from Rupert Murdoch in the president’s Jeffrey Epstein-related defamation case against News Corp due to the media mogul’s advanced age.

A motion filed in court notes Murdoch is 94, has suffered several health setbacks and lives more than 160 kilometres from the Florida court where the defamation suit has been lodged, making it likely he would be “unavailable for in-person testimony at trial”.

Murdoch should provide the deposition within 15 days, Trump’s lawyers argue.

Trump is suing Murdoch, News Corp, chief executive Robert Thomson and two reporters from The Wall Street Journal over a July 18 story that claimed he signed a birthday letter and drawing for Epstein’s 50th birthday in 2003. Trump denies writing the letter or drawing the picture.

Epstein pleaded guilty to procuring a minor for prostitution in a 2008 plea deal and died awaiting trial on sex-trafficking charges in 2019. The president was friends with Epstein in the 1990s but says the two fell out in the 2000s, and denies any knowledge of Epstein’s crimes.

In the motion filed on Tuesday (AEST), Trump’s lawyers say the president spoke directly with Murdoch after being approached by one of the Journal’s reporters about the story before publication.

According to the filing, Trump told Murdoch the letter was “fake”, and Murdoch advised the president that “he would take care of it” – but the paper published the story.

The filing says Trump was left with the impression that Murdoch – who is now chairman emeritus of News Corp, but not an executive – would contact people at the newspaper.

Murdoch is “widely known for having a hands-on approach over editorial decisions related to News Corp’s periodicals”, it says.

It goes on to say that Murdoch’s direct involvement “further underscores [the] defendants’ actual malice and intent behind the decision to publish the false, defamatory, disparaging, and inflammatory statements about President Trump”.

The lawyers also note Murdoch’s age and reported health issues. They cite a story by the UK Telegraph that reported he collapsed during a breakfast with News UK chief executive Rebekah Brooks in London in 2023 – among other recent ailments.

“Murdoch’s age and health warrant conducting his deposition on an expedited basis,” the lawyers argue. “[He] recently turned 94 years old and has suffered, but thankfully overcome, multiple health issues throughout his life.

“Moreover, upon information and belief, Murdoch resides in New York, New York, which is well over 100 miles from this district. Thus, it is presumable, both because of his age and health and/or his distance from this court, that Murdoch will be unavailable for trial.”

Dow Jones, the News Corp subsidiary that publishes the Journal, was contacted for comment. The company has previously said it has full confidence in the rigour and accuracy of the story and will vigorously defend any lawsuit.

Trump is seeking $US10 billion ($15 billion) in damages, punitive damages, court costs and other relief for what his lawyers say was a “concocted” story aimed at maligning the president’s character and integrity.

The Journal reported Trump’s letter was written inside the outline of a naked woman, and appeared in a book that Epstein’s friend and accomplice Ghislaine Maxwell compiled for the disgraced financier’s 50th birthday. Maxwell is serving a 20-year prison sentence for conspiring with Epstein to sexually exploit and abuse girls.

The newspaper did not publish a photo of the book but said it had “reviewed” the letter in question. It later reported former president Bill Clinton and billionaire investor Leon Black also contributed to the book.

Trump is facing a significant backlash from his MAGA supporters and Republicans in Congress about his administration’s failure to release - as promised - more documents related to the investigation of Epstein.

https://www.smh.com.au/world/north-america/age-health-trump-seeks-urgent-evidence-from-murdoch-in-epstein-case-20250729-p5miig.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109438

File: 1e75dc37754e2b9⋯.jpg (1.55 MB,5472x3648,3:2,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 2798f7d51722c15⋯.jpg (1.85 MB,5288x3525,5288:3525,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23397904 (291009ZJUL25) Notable: PM brands Israel’s denial of starvation reports in Gaza ‘beyond comprehension’ – Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has condemned Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s claim that there is no starvation in Gaza, calling it “beyond comprehension.” Albanese criticized Israel’s role in restricting media access and said claims of no starvation were part of Hamas’ propaganda. While Albanese continues to oppose Hamas’ control of Gaza, he indicated that the region could eventually be freed from their rule, paving the way for Palestinian state recognition. The remarks come amid ongoing conflict and international disputes over humanitarian conditions in Gaza.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109386

>>109407

>>109420

PM brands Israel’s denial of starvation reports in Gaza ‘beyond comprehension’

Paul Sakkal - July 29, 2025

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has signalled he believes Gaza will be freed from Hamas’ rule, paving the way for recognition of a Palestinian state, as he slammed Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s claims that Gazans are not starving.

Asked by pro-Palestine backbencher Ed Husic on the timeline for Australia to recognise a Palestinian state in the Labor caucus on Tuesday, Albanese repeated his criticism of Hamas’ role in prolonging the conflict but implored Israel to end the violence.

“While there is a caveat on any information provided by Hamas, it is Israel that has prevented any journalists getting in,” Albanese said. “Those claims that there is no starvation are beyond comprehension.”

He was directly referring to remarks from deputy Israeli ambassador to Australia Amir Meron, who told journalists in a briefing on Monday that claims of starvation amounted to Hamas propaganda and relied on “false pictures” presenting a distorted view.

Albanese also made reference to similar remarks from Netanyahu, who said on Monday there was “no starvation in Gaza”, putting him at odds with aid agencies, the United Nations and contradicting widely shared images of malnourished children.

Loading

Husic lost his ministry after the election, freeing him to be more outspoken on the situation in Gaza. It is rare for MPs to ask challenging questions of the prime minister in Labor’s caucus meetings.

Albanese has emphasised in recent days that Australia would only recognise a state if certain conditions were met, including the removal of Hamas as a governing force from the strip it has ruled since 2007.

But responding to Husic, the prime minister quoted former South African president Nelson Mandela in saying that things can seem impossible until they are not. This was taken by some MPs, who spoke on condition of anonymity, that Albanese believed Gaza could be freed from Hamas’ control.

Albanese will miss a debate on the Palestinian statehood at Labor’s Victorian party conference on the weekend, when he will be at the Garma festival in the Northern Territory.

Loading

Left-wing groups are expected to put forward motions to immediately recognise a Palestinian state and to sanction Netanyahu at the conference. Labor has sanctioned ministers in Netanyahu’s government, but has not indicated it would go as far as punishing the prime minister himself.

Asked about Albanese’s comments in a press conference on Tuesday afternoon, Opposition Leader Sussan Ley said she was distressed by the images coming out of Gaza before calling for the return of the Israeli hostages.

“I’m pleased to see that aid is flowing further and better into Gaza, and I really encourage everyone who sees the situation for the reality it is, to remind others that Hamas’ control of the hostages could end the war tomorrow,” Ley said.

Albanese’s comments in the Labor caucus discussion came a day after Meron said that Israel did not recognise any famine or starvation in Gaza.

“This is a false campaign that is being [led] by Hamas, taking advantage of sick children in order to show a false claim and false presentation of hunger and starvation,” Meron said.

Netanyahu had earlier said it was a “bald-faced lie” that Israel was causing starvation. US President Donald Trump has since demanded Israel allow “every ounce of food” into the besieged strip and said there was “real starvation”.

“We can save a lot of people, I mean some of those kids. That’s real starvation; I see it and you can’t fake that. So we’re going to be even more involved,” Trump said during a visit to Britain this week.

https://www.smh.com.au/politics/federal/pm-brands-israel-s-denial-of-starvation-reports-in-gaza-beyond-comprehension-20250729-p5mimb.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109439

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23397960 (291047ZJUL25) Notable: NSW Police to block Sydney Harbour Bridge pro-Palestine protest – NSW Police have moved to block a pro-Palestine protest on the Sydney Harbour Bridge, citing public safety concerns. The Palestine Action Group had planned to march with 10,000 people to raise awareness of the hunger crisis in Gaza. Acting Deputy Commissioner Peter McKenna stated that the protest would create significant disruption and risk public safety. While negotiations for alternative routes are ongoing, the Palestine Action Group insisted the march will go ahead. Premier Chris Minns also raised concerns about insufficient notice given for the protest.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109251

>>109425

>>109426

NSW Police to block Sydney Harbour Bridge pro-Palestine protest

Emily Bennett - Jul 29, 2025

NSW Police plan to block a march across the Sydney Harbour Bridge by pro-Palestine protesters, claiming the public gathering would put lives at risk.

As the hunger crisis in Gaza spirals, with aid agencies saying the new aid measures from are not enough to counter worsening starvation in the territory, organisers from the Palestine Action Group want to march across the landmark to raise awareness and encourage action.

An application has been lodged by the Palestine Action Group for 10,000 people to march across the bridge on Sunday.

NSW Police acting deputy commissioner Peter McKenna said police would not facilitate the protest but would be open to negotiation on alternative routes and times.

He said if the protest does go ahead on the Sydney Harbour Bridge, police would take the matter to the Supreme Court.

"We can not facilitate that public assembly this Sunday," NSW Police acting deputy commissioner Peter McKenna said.

"The main rationale behind that is public safety."

In 2000, 250,000 people marched across the bridge in support of reconciliation.

In 2023, Hollywood got the nod for filming Fall Guy with Ryan Gosling, and the same year for World Pride.

However McKenna said these events took months of planning and required significant resources.

"If I give the example of the Sydney Marathon, there's about 10 months of planning that goes into that, we don't just put a cone down in the middle of the road and blow a whistle and say 'yep, you're alright to cross'," he said.

"It is very significant to try and close that piece of critical infrastructure to the city, it is a main arterial between the north side and the city.

"It would have a major disruption and effect on thousands of motorists.

"There's emergency vehicles that will have to get across that bridge in emergencies if they need to."

This week, Premier Chris Minns told the protesters that they had not given enough notice.

Despite police moving to block the protest, the Palestine Action Group said the march will go ahead this Sunday.

"Hundreds are starving to death, and Gazan authorities warn that 40,000 babies are at imminent risk of death due to a lack of baby formula, as a result of Israel's blockade and deliberate starvation of the strip," the group said in a statement.

"The Palestine Action Group has been inundated with support for the march in a way that has never been seen in these past two years of genocide.

"The people of Australia, and NSW, have had enough of this atrocity and are determined to take a powerful stand to make it stop.

"We will see an immense and peaceful display of humanity against genocide this Sunday."

McKenna said police have worked with the group to facilitate more than 100 protests and organise alternative protest routes.

"I think we've given them a really fair go," he said.

"We understand there is some angst at the moment about what is going on overseas and are sympathetic to that.

"But the NSW Police decision has to be, first and foremost, about public and police safety."

https://www.9news.com.au/national/nsw-police-to-block-sydney-harbour-bridge-protest-on-sunday/7f443feb-d23f-47e6-8cd0-99320e962860

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EUhn4ewnZgI

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109440

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23402161 (301008ZJUL25) Notable: Video: Overseas criminal suspects in synagogue firebombing – Police are investigating the involvement of overseas criminals, including exiled tobacco kingpin Kazem 'Kaz' Hamad, in the firebombing of the Adass Israel Synagogue in Ripponlea. Australian Federal Police are working with Five Eyes partners to explore links to criminals offshore. Authorities arrested a 21-year-old Werribee man in connection with the attack. The firebombing is believed to be politically motivated, but no terrorism-related arrests or charges have been made yet. Police seized electronic devices during searches, and further arrests are expected.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109251

>>109263

>>109322

>>>/qresearch/23338410

Overseas criminal suspects in synagogue firebombing

Angus Delaney - July 30, 2025

1/2

Police are examining exiled tobacco kingpin Kazem ‘Kaz’ Hamad as part of its investigations into whether offshore criminals worked with Victorian associates to carry out the firebombing of the Adass Israel Synagogue.

The overseas investigations were confirmed after the Victorian Joint Counter-Terrorism Team (JCTT) on Wednesday arrested a Werribee man, 21, as part of an ongoing investigation into the firebombing in Ripponlea on December 6, 2024.

Australian Federal Police Deputy Commissioner Krissy Barrett said investigators were working with Australia’s Five Eyes security partners to ensure “our collective powers and capabilities are drawn upon”, but would not answer questions about which countries they believed the attack’s masterminds were based in.

“Our investigation is not limited to Australia. It involves exploring criminals offshore, and we suspect these criminals worked with criminal associates in Victoria to carry out the arson attack,” Barrett said.

Five Eyes is a multinational intelligence-sharing network which includes Australia, the United States, the United Kingdom, Canada and New Zealand.

Barrett also said authorities were investigating links to exiled tobacco kingpin Kazem ‘Kaz’ Hamad.

“That is a name that has come up in our investigation, and that remains one of our ongoing lines of inquiry,” she said.

Victoria Police allege the 21-year-old Werribee man was one of three individuals who broke into the Ripponlea synagogue and set the fire, but would not divulge if they believed he was involved in orchestrating the attack, or if he was a low-level criminal hired to carry it out.

“I don’t think it’s good to go into the specifics of the individual,” said Victoria Police Deputy Commissioner Wendy Steendam.

“What I want to make clear today is that this investigation remains ongoing, and we anticipate there will be further arrests.”

Authorities still believe the firebombing was politically motivated, but are yet to make any arrests or charges in relation to terrorism. Barrett said investigators would not rule out upgrading charges or laying new ones.

“No offences are off the table at the moment, and we have said from the outset that we’re investigating this as a politically motivated attack,” she said.

Investigators carried out search warrants at seven homes in Melbourne at Point Cook, Toorak, Airport West, Hadfield, Werribee, Weir Views and Coburg.

The man was arrested at the Weir Views property on Melbourne’s western fringe.

When police attended the house an AFP officer was attacked by an unrestrained dog. The officer is recovering in hospital.

“A police firearm was used to stop the attack, and the dog was later euthanised at a veterinary clinic,” Barrett said.

Various items, including phones and electronic devices, were seized during the searches and will be forensically examined, police said.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109441

File: 03c521adab3dc58⋯.mp4 (11.88 MB,640x360,16:9,Clipboard.mp4)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23402220 (301023ZJUL25) Notable: Israel accuses Albanese of telling 'a lie' as a report warns famine is 'playing out' in Gaza – Israeli Foreign Minister Gideon Sa'ar has accused Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese of lying after he claimed Israel was withholding aid and causing starvation in Gaza. Sa'ar rejected the allegations, insisting Israel was not withholding aid. Meanwhile, the Integrated Food Security Phase Classification (IPC) issued a warning that famine is "playing out" in Gaza, with malnutrition and hunger-related deaths rising. The IPC is urging immediate action, as Gaza’s food insecurity and starvation are rapidly accelerating. Famine thresholds have been reached, but Israel maintains that aid is being delivered.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109386

>>109407

>>109438

Israel accuses Albanese of telling 'a lie' as a report warns famine is 'playing out' in Gaza

Matthew Doran - 29 Jul 2025

1/2

Israel's foreign minister has accused Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese of telling "a lie" in accusing Israel of breaching international law in withholding aid from Palestinian civilians in Gaza.

The criticism came as a global hunger monitor issued an alert warning that famine is "playing out" in the Gaza Strip.

On Sunday, Mr Albanese levelled his strongest criticism of the Netanyahu government and the Israeli military, saying the scenes of starving children were "indefensible".

Speaking in Jerusalem today, Israeli Foreign Minister Gideon Sa'ar hit back at the prime minister and rejected the accusation..

"This is a lie, because we are not withholding any aid," he told the ABC.

"It's not only that it's not true, but the opposite is the truth."

Mr Sa'ar echoed the rhetoric of other members of the Israeli government, including Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, that starvation was not gripping Gaza.

The comments are in stark contrast to the scenes coming out of the strip, and warnings from humanitarian agencies and the United Nations of a crisis across the war-ravaged territory.

The Integrated Food Security Phase Classification (IPC) issued an alert this evening warning that the "worst-case scenario of famine is currently playing out in the Gaza Strip".

"Mounting evidence shows that widespread starvation, malnutrition, and disease are driving a rise in hunger-related deaths," it said.

The IPC alert does not formally classify Gaza as being in famine. Such a classification can only be made through an analysis, which the IPC said it would now conduct "without delay".

The IPC is a global initiative that partners with 21 aid groups, international organisations, and UN agencies, and assesses the extent of hunger suffered by a population.

'Immediate action' needed, famine report says

War has raged in Gaza between Israel and Palestinian militants Hamas for the past 22 months.

Facing global condemnation over the humanitarian crisis, Israel said on Sunday it would halt military operations for 10 hours a day in parts of the Palestinian enclave and allow new aid corridors.

At the media event in Jerusalem, Mr Sa'ar insisted that there were no restrictions on aid entering the strip, even as Israel controls all of the borders heading into Gaza and imposed a total humanitarian blockade in March.

Those restrictions were partially eased a few weeks ago, and have been further relaxed since the weekend — but tight controls remain in place.

"There were more than 200 trucks that entered yesterday," Mr Sa'ar said.

"Inside Gaza, waiting to be distributed, we have almost 600 trucks in both the crossings: Kerem Shalom and Zikim.

"And, if we are speaking about the last two months, more than 5,000 trucks entered to Gaza Strip, and anyone who wants to do that can do that."

Mr Sa'ar also pointed to airdrops of aid, which began on Sunday.

"There is no route that we are not using," he said.

For an area to be classified as in famine, at least 20 per cent of people must be suffering extreme food shortages, with one in three children acutely malnourished and two people out of every 10,000 dying daily from starvation or malnutrition and disease.

"Immediate action must be taken to end the hostilities and allow unimpeded, large-scale, life-saving humanitarian response. This is the only path to stopping further deaths and catastrophic human suffering," the IPC alert said.

The latest data indicated that famine thresholds had been reached for food consumption in most of the war-torn Palestinian enclave — where some 2.1 million people remain — and for acute malnutrition in Gaza City, the alert said.

"Formal famine declarations always lag reality," David Miliband, head of the International Rescue Committee aid group, said in a statement ahead of the IPC alert.

"By the time that famine was declared in Somalia in 2011, 250,000 people — half of them children under 5 — had already died of hunger," he said.

"By the time famine is declared, it will already be too late."

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109442

File: 3fc5ddeb897ab73⋯.jpg (1.12 MB,2048x1366,1024:683,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 0ecd2b15df654b2⋯.jpg (2.15 MB,5500x3692,1375:923,Clipboard.jpg)

File: c4f5596c79ebb32⋯.jpg (372 KB,2000x1333,2000:1333,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23402293 (301050ZJUL25) Notable: Albanese resists ‘moral momentum’ call to join UK plans for recognising Palestine – Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has resisted British Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer’s call to recognise Palestine, stating that recognition will only occur after progress towards peace is made. Despite pressure from Australian Labor MP Ed Husic and unions, Albanese reiterated that the government is focused on the two-state solution, not making statements for political gain. A recent statement from 14 nations, including Australia, shows willingness to consider Palestinian statehood, but stops short of endorsing the UK’s position. Meanwhile, opposition foreign affairs spokesperson Michaelia Cash emphasized that recognition should follow peace negotiations.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109386

>>109407

>>109420

Albanese resists ‘moral momentum’ call to join UK plans for recognising Palestine

Natassia Chrysanthos - July 30, 2025

1/2

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese is resisting British Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer’s call to recognise a Palestinian state unless Israel takes urgent steps towards peace, as rank-and-file Labor members and a former frontbencher urge Australia to add to “moral momentum”.

Australia issued a statement with 14 other countries on Wednesday saying it would consider Palestinian statehood as a step towards a two state-solution, and encouraged other nations to do the same, but stopped short of endorsing the United Kingdom’s major foreign policy shift.

Starmer overnight heightened pressure on Israel to commit to a ceasefire by declaring the UK would recognise a Palestinian state in September at the United Nations unless Israel agrees to a ceasefire, two-state solution and ends the humanitarian crisis in Gaza.

The British prime minister said this was “the moment to act” following a declaration from French President Emmanuel Macron last week that France would recognise a Palestinian state at the UN – although the UK has placed a caveat on its plan in a bid to give Israel an incentive to act.

Labor MP Ed Husic, who has been vocal on the issue since losing his ministry after the election, said his caucus colleagues had “deep feeling” about Palestinian recognition and called for the Australian government to support the UK position.

He said the government’s position on recognising Palestine once conditions, such as ending Hamas’ rule of Gaza, was understandable.

“But moral momentum cannot be ignored, and that momentum is significant at the moment, and it requires of us a reconsideration of our approach,” Husic said.

Australian Council of Trade Unions president Michelle O’Neil echoed the backbencher. “I really welcome the comments that have been made by the prime minister and foreign minister about all these issues and the action that’s already been taken, but this is urgent,” she said.

But Albanese, who spoke with Starmer overnight, said Australia was not concerned by the timeframe for recognition.

“What we’re looking [at] is the circumstances where recognition will advance the objective of the creation of two states,” Albanese said at a press conference later on Wednesday morning.

“My entire political life, I’ve said I support two states, the right of Israel to exist within secure borders and the right of Palestinians to have their legitimate aspirations for their own state realised. That is my objective. Not making a statement, not winning a political point, but achieving that.”

Albanese pointed to a separate statement that Wong co-signed on Wednesday with allies including Canada, France and New Zealand, demanding a ceasefire and reiterating an “unwavering commitment to the vision of the two-state solution” while condemning Hamas’ October 7 attacks.

The nations said they had “already recognised, have expressed or express the willingness or the positive consideration of our countries to recognise the State of Palestine, as an essential step towards the two-state solution, and invite all countries that have not done so to join this call”.

They also said Gaza should be unified with the West Bank under the governance of the Palestinian Authority, an idea that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has strongly rejected.

It came on the same day that a United Nations working group, which included the Arab League, released a seven-page plan to end the war and progress towards a two-state solution that did not involve Hamas, which Australia will be asked to vote on in September.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109443

File: 0b3527ff8ef70c0⋯.mp4 (15.6 MB,640x360,16:9,Clipboard.mp4)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23402320 (301105ZJUL25) Notable: Video: Donald Trump says Jeffrey Epstein 'stole' young women, including Virginia Giuffre, from Mar-a-Lago – US President Donald Trump has revealed he fell out with Jeffrey Epstein after the convicted sex offender "stole" young women, including Virginia Giuffre, from his Mar-a-Lago club. Trump recalled telling Epstein, "We don’t want you taking our people," referring to women hired at the Mar-a-Lago spa. Trump also confirmed that Giuffre, who later accused Epstein of sex trafficking, was one of the women taken. Meanwhile, Epstein's associate, Ghislaine Maxwell, seeks immunity before testifying before Congress regarding her role in Epstein’s crimes. Trump denied considering a presidential pardon for Maxwell.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109289

>>109355

>>109437

Donald Trump says Jeffrey Epstein 'stole' young women, including Virginia Giuffre, from Mar-a-Lago

abc.net.au - 30 July 2025

1/2

US President Donald Trump says he fell out with Jeffrey Epstein because the convicted sex offender "stole" young women, including Virginia Giuffre, from his Mar-a-Lago club.

His admission on Tuesday, local time, came as Epstein's long-time associate Ghislaine Maxwell sought immunity from future prosecution as a condition for testifying to a US congressional committee.

Speaking to reporters on Air Force One while flying home from Scotland, Mr Trump gave some of his most expansive public comments yet about his falling out with Epstein, the wealthy and well-connected financier who died in a New York jail in 2019 while awaiting trial for sex trafficking underage girls.

"People were taken out of the [Mar-a-Lago] spa, hired by him, in other words, gone," Mr Trump said.

"When I heard about it, I told him, I said, 'Listen, we don't want you taking our people.'

"And then, not too long after that, he did it again. And I said, 'Out of here.'"

Mr Trump also confirmed that one of the Mar-a-Lago spa attendants taken by Epstein was Ms Giuffre, the Australian who brought a civil case against Epstein's friend Prince Andrew, accusing him of sexually assaulting her when she was 17.

Ms Giuffre, who accused Epstein of using her as a sex slave, took her own life at her home in Australia in April.

"I think she worked at the spa," Mr Trump told reporters.

"I think that was one of the people. He stole her."

The White House has said previously Mr Trump threw Epstein out of his Mar-a-Lago club two decades ago "for being a creep", and US media have reported that they became estranged over a Florida real estate deal.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109444

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23402348 (301124ZJUL25) Notable: Video: Labor says Google 'sharks' won't scare it from banning YouTube for under 16s – Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and Communications Minister Anika Wells have vowed not to be intimidated by Google’s threat of legal action against the Australian government’s plan to restrict children under 16 from accessing YouTube. “We can’t control the ocean, but we can police the sharks,” Wells said, underlining the government’s commitment to safeguarding young Australians from online harm. The new laws, which will take effect in December, will cover platforms like TikTok and Instagram, despite legal pressure from Google. The eSafety Commission has supported the release of the rules.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109412

>>109413

>>109415

Labor says Google 'sharks' won't scare it from banning YouTube for under 16s

Maani Truu - 29 July 2025

1/2

The prime minister has vowed not to be intimidated by Google, as the tech giant threatens to sue over the government's decision to restrict children and teenagers from accessing YouTube.

Australians under the age of 16 will be barred from logging in to YouTube when the social media ban comes into force in December, after the government reversed its plan to grant the video-sharing site an exemption.

Rules of how the ban will operate are set to be presented to parliament on Wednesday, including details of the types of platforms that won't be captured, such as those primarily concerned with gaming, messaging, health and education.

It comes days after Google, the parent company of YouTube, threatened legal action if the government scrapped its previously flagged exemption on the basis of the platform's educational uses.

Communications Minister Anika Wells issued a blunt retort to the tech giant.

"We can't control the ocean, but we can police the sharks, and that is why we will not be intimidated by legal threats when this is a genuine fight for the wellbeing of Australian kids," Ms Wells said.

Flanked by parents whose children had died as a consequence of bullying on social media, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said he would also be promoting Australia's social media ban on the sidelines of the next major United Nations conference in New York in September.

"I know from the discussions I have had with other leaders that they are looking at this and they are considering what impact social media is having on young people in their respective nations, it is a common experience," he said.

"We don't do this easily. What we do, though, is respond to something that is needed here."

YouTube Kids is expected to be spared from the new laws because it does not allow users to communicate with others through the platform.

Unlike other popular social media sites, YouTube does not require users to have an account to access most features and young people will still be able to use the site in a logged-out state after the world-leading laws come into effect.

But including YouTube in the list of social media platforms covered by the ban — which already includes apps like TikTok and Instagram — means under 16s won't be able to access age-restricted content on the video-sharing site.

In a statement on Wednesday, the eSafety Commission welcomed the "important milestone" of the release of the rules, noting there would be no blanket exceptions for platforms.

The commissioner is tasked separately with determining what steps platforms will be expected to take to comply with the new laws.

"Following the release of the Age Assurance Technology Trial report, eSafety will publish these guidelines to support industry's compliance with the legislation," they said.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109445

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23406871 (310950ZJUL25) Notable: Prime Minister Anthony Albanese waiting for right moment to recognise Palestinian state – Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has indicated he will recognise a Palestinian state, but only when the timing aligns with achieving a peaceful resolution. "What we're looking at is the circumstances where recognition will advance the objective of the creation of two states," Albanese said. He emphasized that his goal has always been to support both Israel’s right to exist within secure borders and the legitimate aspirations of Palestinians for their own state. The Prime Minister also reaffirmed Australia’s support for a two-state solution while calling for a ceasefire and the exclusion of Hamas from Palestinian governance.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109386

>>109407

>>109420

>>109442

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese waiting for right moment to recognise Palestinian state

Jacob Greber - 31 July 2025

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese is preparing the ground for an historic shift.

Australia will recognise a Palestinian state, it is only a matter of when and how.

7.30 understands Mr Albanese has been privately indicating to Labor colleagues that such a declaration can only be made once.

He is aiming for a time that best contributes to a peaceful resolution to the conflict between Israel and the Palestinians.

"What we're looking at is the circumstances where recognition will advance the objective of the creation of two states," Anthony Albanese said on Wednesday.

"My entire political life, I've said I support two states, the right of Israel to exist within secure borders and the right of Palestinians to have their legitimate aspirations for their own state realised. That's my objective."

Support for Palestinian statehood among the world's developed nations is growing.

British prime minister Keir Starmer said this week that the UK will recognise the state of Palestine by September unless Israel takes "substantive steps to end the appalling situation in Gaza, agree to a ceasefire and commit to a long-term sustainable peace reviving the prospect of a two-state solution".

The UK move came less than a week after French president Emmanuel Macron pledged to formally recognise Palestinian statehood in September.

If both countries follow through, they would be the first G7 and UN Security Council members to adopt such recognition.

"This decision by France and the UK is significant," Malak Benslama-Dabdoub, a lecturer in Law at Royal Holloway University of London, wrote on The Conversation.

"It signals a departure from the western consensus, long shaped by the US and the EU, that any recognition of Palestinian statehood must be deferred until after final-status negotiations.

"The move also highlights growing frustration in parts of Europe with the ongoing violence in Gaza and the failure of peace talks over the past two decades."

'Significant step'

Foreign Minister Penny Wong on Wednesday signed a joint statement with 14 other countries — including France, Canada and New Zealand — expressing "our determination" to work on a "day after" plan for Gaza that guarantees its reconstruction and the exclusion of Hamas from "Palestinian governance".

The statement also highlighted promises by Palestinian Authority president Mahmoud Abbas that a future Palestinian state would be "demilitarised".

Mr Albanese spoke with Mr Starmer overnight and revealed there would be further conversations between the leaders "in the coming couple of days as well", reiterated that Hamas can play no role in a future Palestinian state.

He noted that the Palestinian Authority leader's pledge implies a future Palestinian state can have neither a conventional or "paramilitary" force.

"That's a very significant step forward," Mr Albanese said.

"What we will continue to do is to put forward a principled position consistent with our unwavering commitment to the vision of the two-state solution."

"In an immediate sense, we continue to call for a ceasefire. We continue to call for hostages to be released. We continue to say that Hamas can have no role in a future Palestinian state, and we continue to call for aid to be allowed to the people of Gaza."

Mr Albanese said "Israel needs to be able to be confident … that they're able to exist without a threat to their security."

Mr Albanese said Australians want the fighting and killing to stop, and they do not want "conflict brought here".

"My priority has been to try to navigate what is a very difficult situation.

"The young Jewish boy or girl going to the local school should not be harassed because of who they are. They are not responsible for what is going on in Gaza.

"And Arab Australians or Muslims are not responsible for what Hamas did."

Former Labor trade minister Craig Emerson told 7.30 that the "recognition of a Palestinian state has been a long and difficult journey for Labor".

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-07-30/anthony-albanese-waiting-for-right-moment-on-palestinian-state/105593298

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7w8QQ4cVuaA

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109446

File: cf15a9cb46bba56⋯.jpg (520.63 KB,2000x1334,1000:667,Clipboard.jpg)

File: d0eecd27cd90197⋯.jpg (134.19 KB,1100x217,1100:217,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 6613beed76b2be3⋯.jpg (1.91 MB,5525x3683,5525:3683,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23406946 (311014ZJUL25) Notable: Trump says Palestinian recognition a threat to trade talks in warning to Australia – US President Donald Trump has warned that the recognition of Palestinian statehood could jeopardise trade negotiations, adding pressure on Prime Minister Anthony Albanese. As Canada, France, and the UK advance plans to recognise Palestine, Albanese stated that Australia's position remains about "when, not if," but without rushing. Labor faces growing internal and external pressure to align with the global momentum for a two-state solution. Meanwhile, Trump warned that Canada's recognition would complicate trade talks, stating it would make a trade deal with Canada “very hard” .

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109407

>>109420

>>109442

>>109445

Trump says Palestinian recognition a threat to trade talks in warning to Australia

Natassia Chrysanthos - July 31, 2025

1/2

United States President Donald Trump has warned that Palestinian recognition could threaten trade talks, raising the stakes for Prime Minister Anthony Albanese as he tries to avoid higher tariffs while navigating a growing global push to advance a state of Palestine.

Labor ministers on Thursday welcomed international momentum for a two-state solution but insisted Australia would stick to its own timeline for recognition after Canada became the latest Western nation to declare it would support Palestinian statehood at a United Nations meeting in September.

Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney announced on Thursday (AEST) that he planned to recognise Palestine, following France and the United Kingdom. But shortly after, he was rebuked by Trump, who warned Canada’s move “will make it very hard for us to make a trade deal with them” on his Truth Social platform.

It complicates the dynamic as Australia tries to negotiate a favourable trade outcome with the US after Trump threatened to raise baseline tariffs on imports to the US, while supporting the international community in pushing for a two-state solution.

Australian officials who spoke on condition of anonymity are bracing for a 15 per cent baseline tariff, up from the previous 10 per cent, when they are announced on August 1.

Foreign Minister Penny Wong on Thursday said recognising Palestinian statehood remained a question of “when, not if” for the government, and Albanese had a call with British Prime Minister Keir Starmer to discuss the situation overnight, a day after the United Kingdom’s major foreign policy shift.

“The leaders agreed on the importance of using the international momentum to secure a ceasefire, the release of all hostages and the acceleration of aid, as well as ensuring Hamas did not play a role in a future state,” an Australian government spokesperson said about the call.

But the Albanese government did not rush to set out its timeline alongside the other nations. “We are engaging with other friends and partners in the international community. Ultimately, this has to be something the great weight of the international community has to come together around,” Wong said on the ABC.

“I hope what happens in New York in September is we see the hostages released, we see the commitments from the Palestinian Authority and others in the region about the security of Israel, the demilitarisation of a Palestinian state, and a move on recognition.

“What we want out of it is something … which breaks the cycle of violence. That’s what we want.”

Labor has been under mounting pressure from rank-and-file members and parts of its caucus to join international counterparts and add to global momentum. Former frontbencher Ed Husic this week said there was “deep feeling” on the issue among his Labor colleagues, and argued there was a moral imperative for Australia to take immediate steps towards recognition.

At the same time, Albanese assured the Executive Council of Australian Jewry in parliament this week that recognition was not imminent. Co-chief executive Peter Wertheim said the prime minister had made two things clear.

“Firstly, Australia will make its own decision concerning the timing of recognition of a Palestinian state. Secondly, recognition must not simply be an empty gesture,” he said.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109447

File: 01f98051b66cb3c⋯.jpg (201.83 KB,1920x1080,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 7dc8af24663623c⋯.jpg (541.55 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 2ccd2ca47473ebc⋯.jpg (442.37 KB,1600x900,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23406966 (311027ZJUL25) Notable: Video: Adass Israel Synagogue arsonist identified as Giovanni Laulu in first court appearance – Giovanni Laulu, 21, has appeared in court charged with arson, recklessly endangering life, and vehicle theft following the firebombing of the Adass Israel Synagogue in Ripponlea in December 2024. Laulu, arrested during counter-terrorism raids across Melbourne, faces multiple charges related to the attack, which caused extensive damage to the $20 million synagogue. CCTV footage shows masked men entering the building with a red jerry can before setting the fire. Investigations continue, with Laulu remanded in custody. Authorities are also exploring possible links to overseas criminals.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109251

>>109263

>>>/qresearch/23338410

>>109440

Adass Israel Synagogue arsonist identified as Giovanni Laulu in first court appearance

MOHAMMAD ALFARES - 31 July 2025

A 21-year-old man accused of being one of the attackers in the firebombing the Adass Israel Synagogue has faced court for the first time, following his arrest during a series of counter-terrorism raids across Melbourne.

Giovanni Laulu appeared in Melbourne Magistrates Court on Thursday morning, charged with arson, recklessly endangering life, and vehicle theft over the attack on the synagogue in Ripponlea in December.

Dressed in a long-sleeved black shirt and sporting a thin moustache and beard, Mr Laulu sat quietly in the dock, only speaking to confirm his identity.

He maintained eye contact with the magistrate and nodded in acknowledgment of directions. He did not apply for bail and was remanded in custody.

The court heard federal and state police were still preparing an extensive brief of evidence against Mr Laulu, with 11 mobile phones yet to be analysed.

Prosecutors requested – and were granted – 12 weeks to finalise their case, with Magistrate Brett Sonnett setting a deadline of October 23.

Mr Laulu was arrested on Wednesday morning during a high-stakes operation led by the Victorian Joint Counter Terrorism Team – a task force comprising Victoria Police, Australian Federal Police and ASIO – which executed a series of co-ordinated raids across Melbourne suburbs.

He is accused of being one of three people who set fire to the synagogue on December 6, 2024.

CCTV footage released this year shows masked men smashing their way into the $20m synagogue, with one carrying a red jerry can before flames engulfed the building.

The fire caused millions of dollars in damage to the synagogue and destroyed priceless religious artefacts, including centuries-old Torah scrolls.

Police allege the group arrived at the scene in a stolen blue Volkswagen Golf, previously described as a “communal crime car” allegedly used in a string of unrelated incidents – including a firebombing at South Yarra’s Lux Nightclub.

According to charge sheets released by the court, Mr Laulu allegedly stole the $40,000 vehicle the night before the synagogue attack, taking it from an address in Tarneit.

On Wednesday, AFP Deputy Commissioner Krissy Barrett confirmed police were examining potential links to overseas criminals.

She said an AFP officer was bitten by a dog during Mr Laulu’s arrest at a Werribee property.

A police firearm was discharged during the arrest and the dog was later euthanised at a veterinary clinic.

Investigations remain ongoing and authorities said they expected to make further arrests.

Another man allegedly involved in stealing the Volkswagen Golf was charged on July 16.

Mr Laulu is due to reappear via video link at Werribee Magistrates Court on August 6 for the state charges.

His federal charges will return to court on December 4 for a committal mention.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/adass-israel-synagogue-arsonist-identified-as-giovanni-laulu-in-first-court-appearance/news-story/e48f7c146666641475c926c94fe19c6d

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109448

File: 427af406b4da52a⋯.jpg (777.39 KB,1920x1080,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: b6e08af3608fd5b⋯.jpg (139.72 KB,1100x217,1100:217,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23406982 (311043ZJUL25) Notable: Australia clueless on Trump’s new tariffs – The Albanese government is bracing for potential tariff increases as US President Donald Trump nears his August 1 deadline for imposing higher tariffs on countries without trade deals with the US. Trump has flagged raising the baseline tariff from 10 per cent to as high as 15-20 per cent, potentially impacting Australian exports. The Australian government has yet to receive official notification and is monitoring Trump’s Truth Social account for updates. With no progress on trade negotiations, Australia risks losing its preferential tariff rate. In contrast, the UK has secured a reduced tariff rate after negotiations, further intensifying Australia's tariff concerns.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>>/qresearch/23372922

>>109435

>>109436

>>109446

Australia clueless on Trump’s new tariffs

Andrew Tillett - Jul 31, 2025

The Albanese government is bracing for a potential tariff hit as officials closely monitor Donald Trump’s Truth Social media account in anticipation that it will give the first inkling from the US president about higher duties on Australian exports to America.

Trump’s latest “D-Day” in his trade war is August 1, his deadline for imposing higher tariffs on countries that have not managed to negotiate a trade deal with the US.

Trump this week flagged increasing the 10 per cent baseline rate – which captures a large proportion of Australia’s exports to the US – to 15 per cent or as high as 20 per cent.

“No news is good news, I hope,” said one government source, speaking on condition of anonymity, in respect to the silence from the White House on whether Australia was in the firing line.

A second government source, not authorised to speak publicly, said as of Thursday morning (AEST) it was unclear how details of any tariff increase would be conveyed to either Canberra or the Australian embassy in Washington.

Trump said has said over the past fortnight he intends to send out as many as 200 letters to countries outlining their tariff rate. About 150 will go to smaller countries that “don’t do that much business” with the US and they will be on the same rate.

US media outlet Politico reported on Thursday that Trump planned to sign a series of executive orders setting out new tariff rates.

Earlier in July, Trump sent off about two dozen letters to the leaders of larger trading partners outlining what their tariffs would be from August 1. Australia did not receive one.

Brushing aside diplomatic protocol, Trump published those letters on his Truth Social account, sharing the news with his 10.5 million followers at the same time.

Truth Social may again provide the first indication of tariff changes, according to the second government source.

Given Australia has been on the lowest tariff rate, the Albanese government has not moved with the same urgency as other countries to strike a trade deal with Trump.

But with the UK managing to reduce its tariff to 10 per cent through negotiations, Australia will lose its advantage if Trump increases the baseline rate to 15 or 20 per cent.

Albanese has offered the US preferential access to Australian critical minerals, an offer the White House has shown little interest in. And while the government denied a link to tariff talks, Trump claimed credit for last week’s announcement that Australia’s ban on beef had been lifted.

Trump used his social media account on Thursday to announce a deal had been struck with South Korea, which imposed a 15 per cent tariff on Korean goods and included promises of Seoul pouring $US350 billion ($540 billion) into investments of Trump’s choosing, and buying $US100 billion of US gas. He also announced he would whack Indian exports with a 25 per cent tariff.

Trump also tried to repudiate his TACO label – Trump Always Chickens Out – by vowing he would not further delay imposing reciprocal tariffs.

“THE AUGUST FIRST DEADLINE IS THE AUGUST FIRST DEADLINE — IT STANDS STRONG, AND WILL NOT BE EXTENDED. A BIG DAY FOR AMERICA!!!” Trump posted.

When Trump announced the first round of tariffs in April, the so-called “liberation day”, Trade Minister Don Farrell and officials had to watch the White House ceremony, as did millions of others around the world, to learn what rate Australian goods would be hit at.

Oversized posters listed each country’s tariff, with Australia copping the lowest rate of 10 per cent because of its trade surplus with the US.

Other countries where the US had a trade deficit were hit with much higher rates under Trump’s “reciprocal tariffs”. Amid a global market meltdown, Trump paused those tariff hikes for 90 days, and then delayed for another month until August.

Farrell’s office declined to comment ahead of Trump’s latest announcement. Comment was sought from Albanese.

https://www.afr.com/politics/federal/will-australia-be-hit-with-new-trump-tariffs-the-govt-has-no-idea-20250731-p5mj7f

https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/114942005076829557

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109449

File: 25c8cd475df3c7e⋯.jpg (161.34 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: d1eb3ec8182ffa2⋯.jpg (430.93 KB,750x936,125:156,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 8865d9e6ee37d42⋯.jpg (186.19 KB,1080x1080,1:1,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23406987 (311054ZJUL25) Notable: US delays AUKUS review as defence spending row drags on – The Trump administration has delayed the AUKUS review, initially set for completion in 30 days, now expected in the fall. Donald Trump’s defence policy chief, Elbridge Colby, cited the need for an empirical assessment aligning with Trump's America First approach. This delay coincides with ongoing tensions over Australia's defence spending, with Washington urging Australia to increase its spending to 3.5% of GDP amid China's military build-up. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese dismissed concerns over the delay, saying it was expected. Meanwhile, Australia and the UK signed a 50-year treaty to strengthen the AUKUS nuclear submarine deal.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109299

>>109316

>>109318

>>109405

US delays AUKUS review as defence spending row drags on

JOSEPH OLBRYCHT-PALMER - July 30, 2025

Anthony Albanese has denied the US is using its AUKUS review as “leverage” after the Trump administration delayed it by several months.

Donald Trump’s defence policy chief Elbridge Colby announced the delay on Wednesday morning (AEST) but did not give a firm date.

Instead, Mr Colby, an AUKUS sceptic, said the review would be completed “in the fall” – much longer than the initial 30 days.

It comes as the Albanese government resists Washington’s demand to hike defence spending to 3.5 per cent of GDP in response to China’s rapid military build-up.

Mr Colby’s office said the AUKUS review would “be an empirical and clear-eyed assessment of the initiative’s alignment with President Trump’s America First approach”.

“As part of this process, the (US Department of Defence) looks forward to continuing regular engagements on this important matter with other parts of the US government, the US Congress, our allies Australia and the United Kingdom and other key stakeholders,” his office said.

“The department anticipates completing the review in the fall.

“Its purpose will be to provide the President and his senior leadership team with a fact-based, rigorous assessment of the initiative.”

Speaking to reporters at Parliament House, the Prime Minister was asked if the delay was “a cause for concern”.

“No, it is not surprising that that would be the case and something that we expected something like that,” Mr Albanese said.

“We expected a review from an incoming government just like the Keir Starmer government did (in the UK).

“We expect that those things take longer than just 30 days.”

Asked if it was being used as “leverage”, he simply replied: “No.”

Last week, Deputy Prime Minister Richard Marles and UK Secretary of State John Healey signed a 50-year agreement to strengthen ties around the AUKUS nuclear submarine agreement.

Mr Marles described it as a “significant a treaty as has been signed between our two countries since federation”.

“It will very much underpin the development of AUKUS, the building of submarines in Adelaide, and what will ultimately see Australia and the United Kingdom operate the same class of nuclear powered submarines in the future,” he said.

Mr Healey said the treaty would support “tens of thousands of skilled, high paid jobs in both our nations”.

“It’s a treaty to build the most powerful, the most advanced attack submarines our two navies have ever had,” he said.

“It’s a treaty that strengthens NATO as well as security in the Indo-Pacific. It’s a treaty that will outlast us as politicians, that will safeguard the security of our children and our children’s children to come.”

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/breaking-news/us-delays-aukus-review-as-defence-spending-row-drags-on/news-story/138ac87a0ea4f8e55fe7a84c7ed4b4b6

https://x.com/DOD_Policy/status/1950316812564123952

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109450

File: ecd319e07ccec3d⋯.jpg (1.66 MB,3335x2223,3335:2223,Clipboard.jpg)

File: d327b93dd20f392⋯.jpg (296.66 KB,800x1947,800:1947,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 7f55037c63ceee6⋯.jpg (1.78 MB,1086x5029,1086:5029,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23407027 (311123ZJUL25) Notable: David James: Sydney childcare worker unmasked as alleged paedophile – Former childcare worker and ex-probationary police officer David James has been publicly identified after a year-long court suppression order was lifted. James, accused of abusing 10 children, faces 13 charges including nine counts of aggravated use of a child to make child abuse material. Police allege he filmed boys aged five and six across multiple centres in Sydney’s northern suburbs between 2021 and 2024. Investigators have seized 142,000 files and notified 1200 families. James remains in custody, with prosecutors given 12 weeks to finalise their case.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109236

>>109238

>>109239

>>109246

David James: Sydney childcare worker unmasked as alleged paedophile

Perry Duffin and Sally Rawsthorne - July 31, 2025

1/2

A male childcare worker accused of abusing 10 children has been unmasked after the Herald successfully fought a year-long court order that prevented the public from knowing his name and former employment as a police officer.

The names of all the centres where alleged paedophile David James worked, almost 60 in total, can now be revealed.

James was initially charged with refusing to grant police access to his phone by the Australian Federal Police as part of a dark web investigation known as Operation Arctile in September last year. Investigators quickly found alleged evidence that he had filmed and photographed children in his care.

Police pored through 142,000 files and allegedly concluded some were child abuse material, Acting Commissioner Brett James said on Thursday.

David James was arrested a month later, and a non-publication order was made over his name to give police time to identify and contact his alleged victims.

He is facing 13 offences with nine counts of aggravated use of a child to make child abuse material, one count of using a child to make abuse material, two counts of possessing abuse material and one count of refusing officers access to his phone.

Court documents, seen by th e Herald last year, suggest James allegedly filmed “pre-pubescent boys”.

Police allege James recorded explicit photos of 10 children aged five to six at six centres “through his employment at out-of-school hours care (OSHC) facilities in the northern suburbs of Sydney between April 2021 and May 2024”.

The AFP on Thursday published a list of 58 centres where James worked.

“The AFP holds no evidence to suggest any alleged offending took place at these facilities,” an AFP statement reads.

Most allegations are too graphic to publish, but include claims the man filmed young boys as they used the bathroom at the daycare.

He also allegedly pleasured himself in a classroom in front of children.

On Thursday, the Herald contested the suppression order, arguing it was time to unmask James as the families of all his alleged victims had been notified.

James’ lawyers protested, but prosecutors and ultimately Deputy Chief Magistrate Michael Antrum agreed, lifting the order immediately.

James, aged in his 20s, worked at an Artarmon daycare and casually at after-school care centres in Sydney’s northern suburbs, including Lane Cove.

James was a failed NSW Police officer who never made it past his probationary period.

Speaking generally, Acting Commissioner Brett James said law enforcement were focused on bringing “paedophiles to justice”.

“What we find is people make, find, they share this type of material for their own personal gain but what they’re doing is preying on young, vulnerable people in our community,” he said.

“These individuals cross all industries, all parts of the communities.”

James was employed as a probationary constable from December 2021 to September 2022 and, after failing to complete his probation, continued in a civilian capacity until his resignation in May 2023.

He was ejected from the NSW Police Force because he was unable to perform to their standards. Police were never aware he was also working part-time in childcare at the time.

“During his employment, the man failed to seek the required approval to engage in secondary employment, and as such, police were unaware of his concurrent role in the childcare sector,” a NSW Police statement reads.

“We acknowledge the seriousness of the allegations and condemn any behaviour that places our community’s most vulnerable members at risk.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109451

File: 13a21369b976510⋯.jpg (506.35 KB,3800x2534,1900:1267,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23407041 (311130ZJUL25) Notable: U.S. Embassy Australia Tweets: (Video) @FBIDirectorKash visited Sydney, Australia, to engage in high-level law enforcement meetings aimed at strengthening international partnerships and addressing shared security challenges. These discussions focus on combating transnational crime, cyber threats, and other global issues that require close collaboration with international allies. Building strong partnerships is vital to ensuring a safer and more secure future for all. - #uswithaus @FBI @AusFedPolice @ASIO @nswpolice @MarineCommand @scg

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

FBI opens first office in New Zealand ‘to counter China and cybercrime’

Kash Patel says the office will strengthen protection of the Five Eyes nations and that the US and New Zealand would work on ‘important global issues’

Eva Corlett - 31 Jul 2025

The director of the FBI, Kash Patel, has opened the bureau’s first ever office in New Zealand, in what he said was an attempt to help counter China’s activities in the Indo-Pacific, crack down on issues including cybercrime, and strengthen protection of the Five Eyes nations.

Patel, who opened the office at the US embassy in Wellington on Thursday, called the event an “historic moment”.

“The announcement that we are opening up our law enforcement attache office here in Wellington shows the world that the FBI is actually prioritising a permanent presence across all Five Eyes countries,” Patel said in a video, supplied by the embassy.

“Here in New Zealand we had not had that until this historic moment, so we are truly humbled with the reception we have been given.”

Patel said the US and New Zealand would work together on “some of the most important global issues of our time”.

“Countering the CCP in the Indopacom [the US’s Indo-Pacific Command] area, countering the narcotics trade, working against cyber intrusion and ransomware operations and most importantly protecting our respective citizenry,” he said.

The FBI has stationed staff in Wellington since 2017, as a sub-office of the legal attaché office in Australia’s capital Canberra, Australia. The new office will have responsibility for partnerships in New Zealand, Antarctica, Samoa, Niue, Cook Islands, and Tonga.

Patel – a Donald Trump ally, who has made headlines in recent weeks over the Epstein controversy - is the most senior member of the US administration to visit New Zealand since the start of Trump’s second term in office.

During his visit, he met with senior government representatives, including the ministers and heads responsible for the country’s police, foreign affairs and spy agencies.

The minister responsible for New Zealand’s intelligence services, Judith Collins said she and Patel had “exchanged a range of insights” on areas such as trans-national organised crime, counter-terrorism, cybersecurity and espionage.

Police minister Mark Mitchell said Patel’s visit should “send a clear message to criminals” that they “cannot hide behind an international border”.

“New Zealand police are continually working with their overseas counterparts like the FBI to catch those engaged in illegal, harmful activities such as drug smuggling and online child exploitation, as well disrupting and preventing this offending from happening in the first place,” he said in a statement.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/jul/31/fbi-opens-new-zealand-office

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109452

File: 3ec718c27ad488d⋯.jpg (1.39 MB,5000x3334,2500:1667,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23407051 (311134ZJUL25) Notable: U.S. Embassy Australia Tweets: (Video) @FBIDirectorKash visited Sydney, Australia, to engage in high-level law enforcement meetings aimed at strengthening international partnerships and addressing shared security challenges. These discussions focus on combating transnational crime, cyber threats, and other global issues that require close collaboration with international allies. Building strong partnerships is vital to ensuring a safer and more secure future for all. - #uswithaus @FBI @AusFedPolice @ASIO @nswpolice @MarineCommand @scg

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109451

Home Affairs minister met with FBI director during secretive Australia visit

Stephen Dziedzic - 31 July 2025

FBI Director Kash Patel paid a quiet visit Australia this week, with Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke later confirming he dined with the law enforcement chief while he was Sydney.

Mr Patel, who is a loyalist of US President Donald Trump, stopped in Sydney earlier this week before travelling to New Zealand to announce the US would expand its FBI office in Wellington.

Neither Australia nor the United States publicly flagged the visit, but after he was approached by the ABC Mr Burke said he "enjoyed" his evening with Mr Patel.

"We share a commitment to keeping our people safe, and I'm optimistic about what we can achieve together in the interest of national security," he said.

A source confirmed the FBI chief met with other officials from the security community while in Sydney, but played-down the significance of the stop-off, suggesting Mr Patel's main focus was on his New Zealand visit.

Mr Patel wields significant power as the head of the US's law enforcement but he is also a controversial figure, in part because he's called some of those jailed for the January 6 assault on Capitol Hill "political prisoners".

Greens home affairs spokesperson David Shoebridge on Thursday called on the government to provide "more transparency" over the meeting.

"The minister, understandably, wanted his meeting with a defender of the January 6 rioters, kept secret," he said.

"Equally understandably, the Australian public has an interest in knowing who our minister for home affairs is meeting with, and why.

"Going forward the best way to avoid public concern about meeting with Trump appointees who defend the January 6 riots is not to meet them in the first place."

While opening the FBI's new permanent office in New Zealand, Mr Patel said he was looking forward to working closely with New Zealand to counter the Chinese Communist Party and other threats in the region.

New Zealand is a member of the Five Eyes intelligence-sharing alliance, alongside Australia, the United States, Britain and Canada.

"Some of the most important global issues of our times are the ones that New Zealand and America work on together," he said.

"The FBI cannot do it alone. The FBI, in my opinion, is the greatest law enforcement agency in the world, and our partners in the Five Eyes are our greatest partners around the world. But we need all of them ... to get after the fight and put the mission first."

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-07-31/fbi-director-kash-patel-australia-visit/105598408

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109453

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23415176 (020759ZAUG25) Notable: Video: FBI director says new office in New Zealand will counter China’s sway, provoking Beijing’s ire – FBI Director Kash Patel’s remarks in Wellington about the new office aiming to counter Chinese influence in the South Pacific have drawn criticism from Beijing and a dismissive response from New Zealand officials. Patel’s comments about tackling the Chinese Communist Party’s activities were quietly rejected by Foreign Minister Winston Peters and other New Zealand leaders, who emphasised the focus on tackling transnational crime. Beijing responded angrily, stating such efforts would not contribute to regional peace. Analysts suggest New Zealand seeks balance between relations with China and its Five Eyes commitments.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109451

>>109452

FBI director says a new office in New Zealand will counter China's sway, provoking Beijing's ire

CHARLOTTE GRAHAM-McLAY - August 1, 2025

1/2

FBI Director Kash Patel provoked diplomatic discomfort in New Zealand by suggesting the opening of a new office in the capital aims to counter China’s influence, drawing polite dismissals from Wellington and criticism from Beijing.

Patel was in Wellington on Thursday to open the FBI’s first standalone office in New Zealand and to meet senior officials. The arrangement aligns New Zealand with FBI missions in other Five Eyes intelligence-sharing nations, which also include the United States, Australia, Canada and the United Kingdom.

The Wellington office will provide a local mission for FBI staff who have operated with oversight from Canberra, Australia, since 2017.

In remarks made in a video published Thursday by the US embassy, Patel said the office would help counter Chinese Communist Party influence in the contested South Pacific Ocean.

New Zealand ministers who met Patel, the highest-ranking Trump Administration official to visit New Zealand, quietly dismissed his claims. A government statement Thursday emphasised joint efforts against crimes such as online child exploitation and drug smuggling, with no mention of China.

‘When we were talking, we never raised that issue,’ Foreign Minister Winston Peters said Thursday.

Judith Collins, minister for the security services, said the focus would be on transnational crime.

‘I don’t respond to other people’s media statements,’ she said when reporters said Patel had mentioned China, Radio New Zealand reported.

Trade Minister Todd McClay rejected a reporter’s suggestion Friday that Wellington had ‘celebrated’ the office opening.

‘Well, I don’t think it was celebrated on Thursday,’ he said. ‘I think there was an announcement and it was discussed.’

Beijing decries the FBI chief's comments

At a briefing Friday, Beijing’s foreign ministry spokesperson Guo Jiakun criticised Patel’s remarks.

‘China believes that cooperation between countries should not target any third party,’ he said. ‘Seeking so-called absolute security through forming small groupings under the banner of countering China does not help keep the Asia-Pacific and the world at large peaceful and stable.’

New Zealand, the smallest Five Eyes partner, has faced continuing pressure to align with US stances on China, its largest trading partner, while carefully balancing relations with Beijing. Analysts said the FBI chief’s comments could vex those efforts, although New Zealand has faced such challenges before.

‘It’s in New Zealand’s interest to have more law enforcement activities to deal with our shared problems,’ said Jason Young, associate professor of international relations at Victoria University of Wellington. ‘It’s perhaps not in New Zealand’s interest to say we’re doing this to compete with China.’

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109454

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23415184 (020818ZAUG25) Notable: Video: Relief as Australia dodges higher Trump tariffs – Australia has successfully avoided an increase in US tariffs, remaining on the 10 per cent base rate as President Trump imposed higher tariffs on other nations. Trade Minister Don Farrell hailed the result as a win for Australia's "cool and calm" diplomacy. The Albanese government’s plan to recognise Palestinian statehood could yet result in tariff hikes for Australian exporters, after Mr Trump warned that Canada could be punished with higher rates for announcing it would recognise Palestine. Australia's exporters still face challenges, including sector-specific tariffs on steel and pharmaceuticals. While the government celebrates, the opposition argues Australia’s trade surplus with the US, not diplomatic efforts, is the reason for the favourable outcome.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>>/qresearch/23372922

>>109435

>>109436

Relief as Australia dodges higher Trump tariffs

BEN PACKHAM and JOE KELLY - August 01, 2025

1/2

Anthony Albanese will go into his first meeting with Donald Trump a winner, with Australia dodging steeper US tariffs to remain on the President’s 10 per cent base rate as other industrialised nations were slapped with duties of at least 15 per cent.

The government claimed the result as vindication of its low-key diplomacy with the Trump administration, which saw the Prime Minister put a presidential meeting on the back burner for nearly seven months in favour of a “watch and wait” strategy.

But the Albanese government’s plan to recognise Palestinian statehood could yet result in tariff hikes for Australian exporters, after Mr Trump warned that Canada could be punished with higher rates for announcing it would recognise Palestine.

Mr Trump’s new executive order on tariffs, issued on Friday, AEST, confirmed Australian goods would continue to face the original “Liberation Day” base rate of 10 per cent, in an outcome Trade Minister Don Farrell lauded as a win for exporters.

“I think this is a vindication for the Albanese government and particularly the Prime Minister in the cool and calm way we have conducted diplomacy with the US,” Senator Farrell said.

“What this decision means in conjunction with all of the other changes to other countries is that Australian products are now more competitive in the American market. This means products like wine, beef, lamb, wheat, in a relative sense, are cheaper into the United States.”

It remains unclear when Mr Albanese will score his first meeting with Mr Trump, but the government is pointing to an array of upcoming summits where the leaders may brush shoulders, including a Quad leaders’ meeting in India and APEC in South Korea.

With tariffs out of the way, Australia’s defence spending and the future of AUKUS are likely to dominate discussions.

Many countries that engaged directly in negotiations with the Trump administration suffered worse tariff outcomes than Australia, including Japan (15 per cent), South Korea (15 per cent), Indonesia (19 per cent) and India (25 per cent). Canada was hit with a 35 per cent rate, up from a previously announced 25 per cent, after Mr Trump suggested Prime Minister Mark Carney’s decision to recognise Palestine would make it “very hard” to do a deal with the country. The White House blamed Canada’s failure to stop the flow of fentanyl into the US for the additional 10 per cent.

Australian steel, aluminium and copper producers will continue to face sector-specific tariffs of 50 per cent, while more than $2bn worth of Australian pharmaceutical exports a year could be hit with a threatened 200 per cent tariff next year.

Mr Trump on Thursday blamed “foreign freeloading nations” for the high drug prices faced by US consumers, in a shot across the bows to drug companies that supply discounted medicines under initiatives like Australia’s Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme.

Senator Farrell said he hoped the tariff reveal was “the end of the matter” and Australia would remain on the 10 per cent rate.

But said he had invited US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnik to Australia to try to negotiate an even better deal.

“We believe in free and fair trade and we will continue to put the argument to the United States that they should remove all tariffs on Australia,” he said.

Opposition trade spokesman Kevin Hogan seized on comments from an unnamed Trump administration official to argue the government had done little to achieve the outcome.

According to the official, countries were sorted into three groups: those with which the US had a trade surplus received 10 per cent tariffs; countries that reached deals or had modest trade deficits received 15 per cent; and higher rates were applied to countries with large trade deficits which did not strike deals.

“Australia was placed in the 10 per cent group because the US runs a trade surplus with us, not because of any effort from the Prime Minister,” Mr Hogan said.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109455

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23415195 (020830ZAUG25) Notable: Albanese government claims vindication after dodging Trump tariff increase – Australia has avoided higher tariffs, with exports to the US remaining at a 10 per cent rate despite earlier threats of a rise to 15 or 20 per cent. Trade Minister Don Farrell called the outcome “a vindication for the Albanese government,” stating, “I haven’t seen any case where retaliatory tariffs result in a better position.” Opposition spokesman Kevin Hogan said Australia was placed in the 10 per cent group because of the US trade surplus, not diplomacy. Farrell highlighted that Australian products like beef and wine are now more competitive in the US market.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>>/qresearch/23372922

>>109436

>>109454

Albanese government claims vindication after dodging Trump tariff increase

Michael Koziol - August 1, 2025

1/2

Washington/Canberra: President Donald Trump has delivered Australia the equal-lowest tariff rate of any country, with its exports to the US to continue to be hit with a 10 per cent impost, prompting the Albanese government to claim its approach had been vindicated.

Trade Minister Don Farrell vowed to continue talks until Australia is allowed to sell goods to the United States with no tariffs, as the opposition accused the government of avoiding increased tariffs on Friday through the economy’s structure rather than diplomacy.

After issuing earlier threats to hike the baseline levy to 15 or 20 per cent, Trump issued an executive order on Friday confirming new tariff rates for several trading partners following “deals” struck with their leaders, as well as revised tariffs for other countries.

Australia received the lowest rate, 10 per cent, when the so-called reciprocal tariffs were announced on April 2. Australia was not named among the changes on Friday (AEST), and a White House fact sheet confirmed any countries not on the new list would remain at 10 per cent, the same as the United Kingdom.

But some countries faced increases: Trump hiked the tariff on goods from New Zealand to 15 per cent.

White House officials indicated the administration was still open to compromise if countries removed trade barriers and came to Trump with a proposed deal. The tariffs are set to take effect in seven days.

Farrell, the trade minister, said Trump’s decision vindicated Australia’s “cool and calm” diplomatic approach to the negotiations.

“At no stage did we introduce tariffs on American goods,” Farrell said. “I haven’t seen any case or any example where the retaliatory imposition of tariffs has resulted in a country being in a better position.”

Farrell said he had invited US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick to Australia to negotiate further, with the government’s position being that true reciprocity would mean zero tariffs from Washington, given the existing free trade deal between the countries.

“The Americans export about double to us what we export to them,” Farrell said. “But we will continue the discussions until we get all of those tariffs removed.”

Opposition trade spokesman Kevin Hogan said Australia appeared to have been fortunate to be grouped into the group of countries that buy more goods from the US than they sell in return.

“Australia was placed in the 10 per cent group because the US runs a trade surplus with us, not because of any effort from the prime minister,” Hogan said.

Australia’s largest export industries to the US include beef and other meats, gold and pharmaceuticals.

Farrell said the decision would make many Australian products more competitive in the American market because rival goods from other nations faced higher trade penalties.

“This means products like wine, like beef, like lamb, like wheat, in a relative sense, are cheaper into the United States,” Farrell said. “And as a government, we will assist all of our exporters in ensuring that we take advantage of this situation and increase the volume of exports, not just to the United States, but to all of those other countries that we have diversified with.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109456

File: 5cfb94bb1314ed3⋯.jpg (1.54 MB,4697x3131,4697:3131,Clipboard.jpg)

File: af70419316da762⋯.jpg (826.74 KB,1100x1492,275:373,Clipboard.jpg)

File: c22adb767b43722⋯.jpg (299.22 KB,894x1148,447:574,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23415214 (020907ZAUG25) Notable: Trump takes aim at ‘foreign freeloading nations’ over drug prices in new threat to PBS – US President Donald Trump has ordered pharmaceutical firms to extend “most favoured nation” pricing to Medicaid, warning companies to “negotiate harder with foreign freeloading nations” or face penalties. Letters sent to 17 drugmakers, including Pfizer, AstraZeneca and Johnson & Johnson, demanded overseas profits be repatriated to lower US drug costs. Trump, who pledged tariffs of up to 200 per cent on pharmaceutical imports, also signalled new baseline tariff hikes on key trading partners, leaving Australia uncertain about impacts on its Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109280

>>109455

Trump takes aim at ‘foreign freeloading nations’ over drug prices in new threat to PBS

Michael Koziol - August 1, 2025

1/2

Washington: US President Donald Trump has blamed “foreign freeloading nations” for the high drug prices faced by Americans and told pharmaceutical firms to negotiate harder with other countries, in a new threat to programs such as Australia’s Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme.

Trump issued letters to the bosses of 17 drug firms on Thursday (Friday AEST) demanding they extend “most favoured nation” pricing to the US Medicaid scheme, and guarantee such pricing for new drugs. It means other comparable, high-income nations could not be offered cheaper prices than the US.

“Domestic MFN pricing will require you, and all manufacturers, to negotiate harder with foreign freeloading nations,” Trump wrote in the letters.

“US trade policy will endeavour to support this. However, increased revenues abroad must be repatriated to lower drug prices for American patients and taxpayers through an explicit agreement with the United States.”

The letters were sent to major drugmakers including Pfizer, Eli Lilly, AstraZeneca and Johnson & Johnson, and published on Trump’s social media.

They did not mention Australia but referred to putting “an end to the free ride of American innovation by European and other developed nations”.

Under the PBS, Australians can buy life-saving drugs worth thousands of dollars for as little as $31.60 a script after the government negotiates with the drug company to secure a lower price based on buying in bulk.

Trump’s letter makes explicit instructions to drug firms to “negotiate harder” and return those extra profits to American patients and taxpayers.

“Other nations have been freeloading on US innovation for far too long; it is time they pay their fair share,” he wrote, giving firms until September 29 to commit to the goals.

If drugmakers refuse to step up, the administration will “deploy every tool in our arsenal” to end “abusive drug pricing practices”, he wrote.

It was not immediately clear how Trump’s instructions would intersect with the PBS more broadly. Treatment of pharmaceuticals is already managed under the US-Australia free trade agreement.

Trump has also pledged to impose 200 per cent tariffs on imports of pharmaceuticals, which would hit more than $2 billion a year in Australian drug products. The Australian government said in early July it was seeking more detail on the plan.

American drugmakers have long harboured other gripes against the PBS, including that it restricts market access for non-listed products, or undervalues innovative products.

An industry lobby group, Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America, identified the PBS on a list of “egregious and discriminatory” policies in a submission to the US Trade Representative this year, saying it threatened market competitiveness.

A spokesperson for Health Minister Mark Butler said the government would not negotiate over the future of the PBS.

“Our government is getting on with the job of delivering cheaper medicines for Australians,” they said. “The PBS is not up for negotiation.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109457

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23415263 (021008ZAUG25) Notable: Video: Harbour Bridge protest in limbo after police argue crowd crush threat – NSW Police has sought a Supreme Court prohibition order against Sunday’s pro-Palestine march across the Harbour Bridge, warning of “unprecedented” risks to public safety, including crowd crush and disruption to emergency access. The move followed a counter-protest threat by fringe pro-Israel group Never Again is Now, which was later withdrawn. Organisers say up to 100,000 protesters will attend, with activists arguing a sanctioned road closure would be safer. The protest has divided Premier Chris Minns’ party, with five Labor MPs joining crossbenchers in backing the march despite Minns’ opposition.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109251

>>109425

>>109439

Harbour Bridge protest in limbo after police argue crowd crush threat

Jessica McSweeney - August 1, 2025

A decision on the fate of a pro-Palestine march across the Harbour Bridge will be made on Saturday after police argued it would bring too great a risk to public safety, in part because of threats of a counter-protest in the Sydney Harbour Tunnel which has since been cancelled.

NSW Police is seeking a prohibition order in the Supreme Court against a planned march across the bridge by the Palestine Action Group on Sunday.

A last-minute application to police by fringe pro-Israel group Never Again is Now was lodged on Friday, and threatened to block the tunnel in recognition of hostages held in tunnels by Hamas, NSW Police’s barrister Lachlan Gyles, SC, told the court.

The competing protests could lead to clashes and hostility, as well as risks to safety if the bridge needed to be closed, he argued. A police spokesperson confirmed that the counter-protest was withdrawn on Friday evening.

About 100 supporters tried to enter the packed court on Friday afternoon, which had to briefly pause as activists pushed in and sat on the floor.

The court heard up to 100,000 protesters could descend on the bridge on Sunday, which police argue cannot be accommodated safely in such a short time frame.

“This is really unprecedented … in terms of scale, level of risk, lack of time to prepare, and of course location, which is one of the main arteries in one of the largest cities in the world,” Gyles said.

Gyles argued if “there are violent scenes” or if ambulances were blocked from accessing patients, “the court has to be concerned about being seen to condone that”.

Activists say they are willing to delay this weekend’s march over the Harbour Bridge if police agree to support the protest.

The protesters plan to march from Lang Park near Wynyard to the US consulate in North Sydney at 1pm on Sunday.

“Fifty thousand people at Lang Park, whether authorised or unauthorised, has significant public safety risk, crowd crush. I’m personally concerned about that,” acting Assistant Police Commissioner Adam Johnson said under cross-examination.

Palestine Action Group protester Josh Lees, who earlier described the protest as “unstoppable”, told the court he believed that closing the appropriate roads and allowing people to protest on the bridge would in fact be safer.

He argued that the short amount of planning time was necessary because a protest needed to happen immediately to have maximum effect as the world grappled with images of starving children in Gaza. Lees said police had appropriate powers to adequately protect the public from risks of counterprotests.

The prohibition order would not ban the protest, but would revoke certain protections, including for blocking roads.

On behalf of the Palestinian Action Group, barrister Felicity Graham argued having crowds between 50,000 to 100,000 was a foregone conclusion for this Sunday, and being able to safely march on the roads without the threat of arrest would be a far safer outcome for the public.

“It would create a very fluid, dangerous and unstable situation if the court grants this application. It’s unclear exactly what would unfold, but it’s clear police wish to have powers to arrest people simply for being on a road,” she said.

Acting Deputy Commissioner Peter McKenna earlier told 2GB the protest was “stoppable” and accused protesters of communicating mixed messages about whether the protest would go ahead regardless of the court outcome.

The protest has revealed unrest within Premier Chris Minns’ party, with five Labor MPs joining the Greens and independent crossbenchers to sign a letter supporting the march, after Minns declared it should not go ahead.

Labor’s Sarah Kaine, Stephen Lawrence, Anthony D’Adam, Cameron Murphy and Lynda Voltz all pledged to join Sunday’s protest, along with independents Alex Greenwich, Jacqui Scruby and Libertarian John Ruddick.

The letter detailed “in strong terms our disapproval of the ongoing starvation of the Palestinian people” and called on the government to work with protest organisers to facilitate a safe march.

Kaine said she would march with her elderly parents and her children, who told her they intended to turn up regardless of the court outcome.

“This issue is too important to be postponed,” she said.

Minns previously said the protest would cause Sydney to descend into chaos.

https://www.theage.com.au/politics/nsw/police-say-harbour-bridge-protest-could-end-in-crowd-crush-20250731-p5mjdi.html

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=14_HPxwIIyA

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109458

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23415265 (021010ZAUG25) Notable: Video: Sydney Harbour Bridge to close for 4 hours, as cops prepare for Sunday traffic chaos – The NSW Supreme Court has authorised a pro-Palestine “March for Humanity” across the Sydney Harbour Bridge, prompting police to warn of major disruption as the bridge shuts from 11.30am to 4pm Sunday. Justice Belinda Rigg ruled safety could be maintained, citing Palestine Action Group’s track record, while organiser Josh Lees called the march an “urgent necessity” amid Gaza’s crisis. Police warned of “serious safety concerns” but pledged a strong presence. The Executive Council of Australian Jewry condemned the ruling, calling it reckless and divisive.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109251

>>109425

>>109439

>>109457

Sydney Harbour Bridge to close for 4 hours, as cops prepare for Sunday traffic chaos

STEPHEN RICE and HOLLY TRUELOVE - 2 August 2025

1/2

The Sydney Harbour Bridge will be closed to traffic for at least four hours on Sunday after pro-Palestine protesters were given permission to hold a “March for Humanity” in support of Gaza, following a ruling by the NSW Supreme Court handed down on Saturday morning.

Police have confirmed the bridge will close at around 11.30 Sunday morning and is expected to reopen at 4pm, but the march from the CBD to North Sydney could take much longer, amid estimates that 50,000 people may take part.

Transport for NSW warned Sydneysiders there would be “significant disruptions” to the Sydney road and transport network, with commuters urged to avoid non-essential travel. Trains will continue to run across the bridge but bus services will be severely impacted.

Acting Deputy Commissioner Peter McKenna said police would “have to scramble now, there’s no doubt about that.” He warned that although the march had been authorised by the court, police would not tolerate any breach of the law, including hate speech.

There would be a “significant” police presence throughout the city and police would “have no hesitation but to take action if protesters do not do the right thing”.

Police had opposed the march, in part because they say they have not been given enough time to prepare proper traffic and crowd management plans.

However Justice Belinda Rigg ruled the protest could go ahead on Sunday, saying the Palestine Action Group had “ensured that people’s safety was a priority” on previous protest days.

Justice Rigg said she accepted the evidence of PAG organiser Josh Lees that the timing of the march was “based on his view that ‘we are at a critical moment, on the issue of Palestinian rights not only due to the crisis in Gaza, itself, but also due to awareness of that crisis brought about by the horrific images, published in the media recently’.”

“Mr Lees’ evidence indicates that the timing and the lodging of this proposed march and its location is directly responsive to the dramatic increase in the known suffering of Gazan citizens over the last weeks.

“He states, ‘the March for Humanity is an urgent necessity demanded by the urgent situation in Gaza right now, where at least 147 people have died from starvation, and Gazan authorities warn 40,000 infants under the age of one are at imminent risk of death due to the lack of baby formula.”

Justice Rigg said Mr Lees had indicated “support in the Australian community has been growing” and that the march was “publicly endorsed by a great number of people and organisations including the council of civil liberties”.

“The public interest in freedom of expression at this time in the manner contemplated for the reasons advanced is very high,” she said.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109459

File: df23f276a31cbe8⋯.jpg (1.36 MB,3631x2421,3631:2421,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23415282 (021028ZAUG25) Notable: Albanese’s allies work to kill off anti-AUKUS push before Labor conference – Prime Minister Anthony Albanese’s allies in Labor’s Victorian Left are lobbying to soften or block a grassroots motion demanding Australia “withdraw” from AUKUS and denouncing US President Donald Trump as a “demagogue.” The push, led by Labor Against War, comes as the Pentagon reviews the $360 billion pact amid US concerns about submarine production. Powerbrokers aligned with Deputy PM Richard Marles are trying to avoid debate, while former foreign minister Bob Carr said the cost justifies scrutiny. A harsh motion could unsettle Washington about Labor’s commitment to AUKUS.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109299

>>109316

>>109318

>>109405

Albanese’s allies work to kill off anti-AUKUS push before Labor conference

Paul Sakkal and Kieran Rooney - August 1, 2025

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese’s allies are scrambling to put a lid on an anti-AUKUS grassroots Labor move that threatens to complicate a US probe into the submarine pact.

The party’s Victorian Left faction, led by minister Andrew Giles and who back the prime minister, are lobbying behind the scenes to water down a motion submitted by the anti-US Labor Against War to Labor’s state conference on Saturday that slams US President Donald Trump and demands the government “withdraw” from AUKUS.

The push comes at a time when the Pentagon is reviewing the $360 billion nuclear deal and the US Navy is concerned the country is not building enough nuclear submarines to sell any to Australia in the 2030s without a dramatic increase in production.

Australian officials are emphasising to the US that AUKUS gives it a more powerful military position in the Indo-Pacific to persuade it to stay committed to the deal, but the push from rank-and-file Labor members highlights discomfort in the party about closer ties with the US military.

Powerbrokers loyal to Deputy Prime Minister Richard Marles in the Victoria Right faction are trying to kill off debate on AUKUS entirely, according to sources in both factions who asked to remain anonymous because talks about the Left faction-dominated Victorian Labor conference were private.

“There is a general view in the membership that AUKUS is a crock of shit,” one senior party figure said, “but we’re all going along with it because it’s like a federal version of the Suburban Rail Loop that we can’t ditch.”

The loop is an expensive Victorian infrastructure project announced with little scrutiny. Since 2018, it has provoked fierce criticism from transport academics and Labor’s political opponents, but the state Labor government attributes its thumping election wins to the project.

Spokespeople for Giles and Marles declined to comment. Labor Against War, which does not have significant institutional backing in the party, was contacted for comment.

Former foreign minister Bob Carr, a frequent critic of the nuclear submarine pact signed by the Morrison government, said the Labor conference was entitled to debate it given “it is so colossally expensive that it’s crowding out other options for the defence of this continent”.

“It is going to leave us almost certainly without a sovereign submarine capacity as the Collins class boats are retired,” he said.

Carr previously served as the director of the Australia-China Relations Institute and holds more moderate views on the threat posed by China than Australian defence officials, as expressed in the landmark Defence Strategic Review. The only federal Labor member who has raised public concern about AUKUS is Fremantle MP Josh Wilson.

Marles said on July 26, at an AUKUS treaty signing with UK counterparts, that AUKUS will create 20,000 jobs in Australia and “deliver is the biggest leap in Australia’s military capability, really, since the formation of the navy back in 1913”.

Labor’s state conference is not as significant as the national version, which backed AUKUS after a bruising debate during the last parliamentary term. However, a sharply worded anti-AUKUS motion could cause US officials to question the governing party’s commitment to the pact.

The current motion states that Trump is a “demagogue” who is a “danger to peace and security”.

Conference motions do not bind governments.

A key point of contention in the AUKUS motion is whether to use a word such as “withdraw”. Discussions are under way about whether the wording can be toned down to cause less conflict, according to sources familiar with the negotiations.

“The question will come down to whether the AUKUS opponents are willing to adjust the language sufficiently to avoid embarrassing the government,” one source said.

Wording can be altered as late as Saturday morning when delegates from Labor’s Left will meet and decide on the final form of each motion before taking it to conference. Resolutions could also be merged or pulled up to this point.

Marles will be the most senior party figure at the event over the weekend because Albanese is at the Garma festival in the Northern Territory.

Duelling motions related to Israel and Gaza are also expected to be debated at the conference.

https://www.theage.com.au/politics/federal/albanese-s-allies-work-to-kill-off-anti-aukus-push-before-labor-conference-20250731-p5mja3.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109460

File: 69f9b555ac9089e⋯.jpg (247.96 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 1ede6a99e481f45⋯.jpg (213 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 300671b46449bde⋯.jpg (204.19 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23415285 (021034ZAUG25) Notable: Victorian Labor conference heats up over Gaza, AUKUS – Victorian Labor delegates have voted to urge the Albanese government to immediately recognise a Palestinian state, impose sanctions on Israel, and suspend participation in AUKUS. The Gaza motion called for trade in arms with Israel to cease, while the AUKUS resolution demanded funding be halted and the pact removed from Labor’s platform. Labor Against War described AUKUS as “madness” under Donald Trump, but Premier Jacinta Allan insisted only government sets policy, reiterating support for AUKUS and the two-state solution. Defence Minister Richard Marles faced flag-waving protests inside the conference hall.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109299

>>109316

>>109445

>>109459

Victorian Labor conference heats up over Gaza, AUKUS

RYAN BOURKE - 2 August 2025

The Victorian Labor Party has overwhelmingly voted for the Albanese government to immediately recognise a Palestinian state, step up sanctions against Israel and suspend its participation in AUKUS at its annual conference.

Despite support from delegates, Labor MPs have distanced themselves from the motions with Premier Jacinta Allan insisting only the government can determine its policies.

The first motion called for a federal parliamentary inquiry into the AUKUS submarine deal and for Australia to suspend participation and funding for the alliance pending its findings. It also called for the removal of AUKUS from the Labor policy platform.

Labor Against War Victorian convener Hamish McPherson told delegates that “AUKUS is a dangerous and doomed pact that can’t be fixed or tweaked,”

“It was a bad idea when it was conceived by Scott Morrison, Boris Johnson and Joe Biden, but with Donald Trump now in power … It is madness,” he added.

The motion passed overwhelmingly, while attempts by moderates to water it down were defeated.

The second motion called on the federal government to recognise Palestine immediately, to extend comprehensive sanctions against Benjamin Netanyahu’s cabinet, and to cease trade of all arms or military goods with Israel.

Motion mover Oliver Van Ingen told delegates the Albanese government needed to do so “to preserve any hope of Palestinians preventing further illegal territorial approaches”.

“The International Court of Justice has ruled that Australia has a positive duty to end complicity in Israel’s crimes,” he added.

Delegate Nick Dyrenfurth from Labor Friends of Israel failed to pass an amendment to the resolution calling for the government to pursue the exclusion of Hamas from a two-state solution and release all hostages.

“Until then peace is going to be very difficult if not impossible,” he said.

Mr Dyrenfurth was also unsuccessful in his attempt to amend a separate motion on equality to include a condemnation of anti-Semitism and described the failure of that amendment as “offensive, disingenuous, and a deliberate provocation to Jewish Laborites and Jewish Victorians”.

While motions at the conference can determine and influence the party’s official policies, the government is not bound to follow them.

Speaking after her address to the conference on Saturday morning, Premier Allan said it was important for the conference to enable “a contest of ideas”.

“But let’s be clear, it’s the government that sets government policy, and our policy is to support the Federal government’s position around a two-state solution”.

Ms Allan said her government was just as committed to AUKUS, adding that the defence industry was a vital part of the state’s economy, including her own electorate of Bendigo where Bushmaster armoured vehicles are manufactured.

“As someone who represents a community that has a very strong defence industry in Bendigo, I understand very keenly the importance of the defence industry to our economy, to supporting working people and families, to good jobs in regional and rural Victoria, but also across Melbourne as well,” she said.

The conference was also addressed by Defence Minister Richard Marles, with members of the Labor friends of Palestine group holding up Palestinian flags and playing videos of famished children while he spoke.

Protesters also gathered outside the Moonee Valley Racecourse where the conference was held, but were unable to make their way onto the premises, with security and police numbers boosted after last year’s attempted storming of the conference by activists.

It comes as pro-Palestine protesters prepare to shut down the CBD and King Street bridge as part of its weekly Sunday protest, a move that police have sought to prevent due to its status as a critical access point for emergency services.

Asked if she had a message for protesters planning on ignoring warnings from police, Ms Allan said, “Anyone intending to disrupt emergency services or everyday Victorians going about their Sunday safely will be dealt with swiftly by Victoria Police”.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/victorian-labor-conference-heats-up-over-gaza-aukus/news-story/f5a4a34ef96670a909078658a5462932

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109461

File: 0498362a51d49ce⋯.jpg (280.34 KB,2048x1408,16:11,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23415297 (021040ZAUG25) Notable: CNO Nominee Caudle Says Sub Construction Pace Needs to Grow to Deliver on AUKUS Promise – US Navy chief nominee Adm. Daryl Caudle told Congress the industrial base must double attack submarine output to meet AUKUS commitments, with production needing to rise from 1.3 to 2.3 Virginia-class boats annually while also building Columbia-class submarines. Caudle praised Australian submariners but warned current capacity falls short of Trump administration goals, calling for “transformational improvement.” He backed outsourcing, shipyard reform, and allied maintenance partnerships to ease pressure. Caudle also highlighted amphibious fleet readiness problems, saying the Navy cannot sustain required Marine deployments.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109299

>>109316

>>109318

>>109405

CNO Nominee Caudle Says Sub Construction Pace Needs to Grow to Deliver on AUKUS Promise

MALLORY SHELBOURNE - JULY 24, 2025

1/2

WASHINGTON, D.C. — The U.S. industrial base must double its attack submarine output for America to meet its obligations under the AUKUS agreement with Australia and the United Kingdom, the Navy’s nominee to lead the Navy told Congress Thursday.

Testifying before the Senate Armed Services Committee as part of his confirmation process to serve as the next chief of naval operations, Adm. Daryl Caudle praised Royal Australian Navy (RAN) submariners and said the current Pentagon-wide review of the AUKUS partnership is about U.S. industrial capacity.

“The question of Australia’s ability to conduct undersea warfare is not in question by me or by anyone,” Caudle told Sen. Tim Kaine (D-Va.), who chairs the SASC seapower subcommittee. “But as you know, the delivery pace is not where it needs to be to make good on the Pillar 1 of the AUKUS agreement, which is currently under review by our Defense Department.”

As of last month, the Pentagon is reevaluating AUKUS, which would see the U.S. share its nuclear propulsion technology for the second time in history, to ensure it aligns with the Trump administration’s priorities, USNI News previously reported. Elbridge Colby, the under secretary of defense for policy, is leading the assessment of the pact that could see the U.S. sell up to five Virginia-class attack boats to the RAN as an interim solution while it helps Australia develop an indigenous capability to maintain and build nuclear-powered attack submarines.

To sell the Virginia boats to the Australians, Navy officials have said the U.S. industrial base must build 2.33 attack boats per year while also keeping pace constructing one Columbia-class nuclear ballistic missile submarine each year. The industrial base currently builds about 1.3 attack boats per year.

Caudle agreed with SASC Chairman Sen. Roger Wicker (R-Miss.) that the U.S. Navy and the defense industrial base must pursue pivotal changes so General Dynamics Electric Boat and HII’s Newport News Shipbuilding can construct double the attack submarines they’re currently building.

“We do have to understand whether or not the industrial base can produce the submarines required so that we can make good on the actual pact that we made with the U.K. and Australia, which is around 2.2., 2.3 Virginia-class submarines per year,” Caudle told senators. “That’s going to require a transformational improvement, not a 10 percent improvement, not a 20 percent, a 100 percent improvement.”

Caudle called for creativity, outsourcing work, and minimizing the attrition at the shipyards to increase that build rate. He told lawmakers that the biggest challenge the U.S. Navy currently faces in its quest to counter the Chinese military and manage worldwide threats is capacity across the service.

Caudle, a career submariner who is currently the commander of U.S. Fleet Forces, endorsed working with international partners to maintain and repair U.S. ships and said he would assess how other countries could help the U.S. with its capacity challenges.

“I don’t know how we do what we need to do without bringing international partners into the capacity problem that we have while we build up our capacity because we need ships today,” Caudle told Sen. Tommy Tuberville (R-Ala.). “And so there are no magic beans to that. There’s nothing that’s just going to make that happen. So the solution space has got to open up, and I think part of that has to look at international partnerships to give us a little bit of a relief valve while we work on our own organic industrial capacity.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109462

File: 1d7975607469876⋯.jpg (189.63 KB,1400x932,350:233,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23415327 (021102ZAUG25) Notable: ‘Not woke stuff’: Trump administration bars US officials from Australia defence talks – The Trump administration has blocked Pentagon officials from travelling to Canberra for the US-Australia Indo-Pacific Deterrence Dialogue, citing concerns that think tank events conflict with its “America First” agenda. The cancellation halted confidential discussions on military integration, nuclear deterrence and China strategy, prompting warnings it undermines alliance ties. Australian experts called the move “disappointing” and “self-defeating,” while the US Studies Centre said Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth was fighting “internal culture wars.” Organisers hope to reschedule, but future exchanges remain in doubt under the Pentagon edict.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109299

>>109316

>>109318

‘Not woke stuff’: Trump administration bars US officials from Australia defence talks

Matthew Knott - August 2, 2025

1/2

Confidential talks canvassing strategies to prevent a war with China and deepen the United States-Australia alliance have been scrapped after the Trump administration abruptly blocked senior defence officials from travelling to Canberra next week.

National security experts fear an array of exchanges between US and Australian counterparts will dry up following a sweeping Pentagon edict, announced this week, suspending all participation in think tank and research events because it suspects they do not align with Donald Trump’s “America First” agenda.

The edict comes as the US reviews the future of the AUKUS nuclear-powered submarine pact and Prime Minister Anthony Albanese prepares for a potential first meeting with Trump in September after months of no discussions between the pair.

US and Australian officials were planning to meet some of the nations’ top defence experts in Canberra on Monday and Tuesday next week for the fifth round of the US-Australia Indo-Pacific Deterrence Dialogue, but the event was suddenly called off on Wednesday when the American officials were told they were no longer allowed to travel to the event.

Around 40 American and Australian national security figures would have gathered to discuss issues such as military integration, nuclear deterrence and strategic interaction with China at the closed-door dialogue, which involved months of planning.

The so-called “1.5 track” event brings together current military leaders, government officials and diplomats with non-government researchers. Discussions are held under the Chatham House rule to foster frank discussions on sensitive and complex topics, with the participants’ identities kept secret.

This would have been the first time the dialogue has been held since Trump’s re-election.

Chief Pentagon spokesman Sean Parnell said in a statement: “In order to ensure the Department of Defence is not lending its name and credibility to organisations, forums, and events that run counter to the values of this administration, the Department’s Office of Public Affairs will be conducting a thorough vetting of every event where Defence officials are invited to participate.”

Rory Medcalf, head of the Australian National University’s National Security College, said the “cancellation of this dialogue is disappointing and counterproductive for alliance interests”.

“This would have been a valuable opportunity for the US administration to help Australians understand its strategy, and for us to help explain Australia’s security priorities,” he said.

“It is in the interests of both countries that such dialogues resume as soon as possible.”

Foreign policy sources, speaking on condition of anonymity, blasted the US move as “a shock”, “narrow-minded” and “self-defeating”.

“This is a war on expertise,” one foreign policy expert said. “These dialogues are not woke stuff, they are about hard strategy … This is the US shooting themselves in the foot.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109463

File: 2803ca7e68001b7⋯.jpg (316.56 KB,2000x1333,2000:1333,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 07248a4271ef63d⋯.jpg (1.23 MB,4345x2897,4345:2897,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23415344 (021116ZAUG25) Notable: ‘Low on the priority list’: Trump administration in no rush to appoint ambassador – US President Donald Trump has yet to nominate an ambassador to Canberra despite doing so for more than 50 countries, fuelling claims Australia ranks low on his agenda as tariff decisions and an AUKUS review loom. Analysts said the vacancy underscores limited engagement between Trump and Prime Minister Anthony Albanese, who has not secured a meeting with the president. DFAT called the delay routine, but experts warned alliances under Trump hinge on personal ties. Canberra is currently represented by chargé d’affaires Erika Olsen.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109299

>>109454

>>109294

‘Low on the priority list’: Trump administration in no rush to appoint ambassador

Matthew Knott - July 31, 2025

1/2

US President Donald Trump has shown no sign of appointing an ambassador to Canberra despite doing so for more than 50 other countries, fuelling accusations Australia is a low diplomatic priority as Trump weighs decisions on tariff rates and the future of the AUKUS defence pact.

The federal opposition has intensified its criticism of Prime Minister Anthony Albanese for not securing a meeting with Trump this week after the president said he planned to increase his baseline tariff rate from 10 per cent to as much as 20 per cent.

The Trump administration has announced ambassadorial nominees for at least 52 countries, including Malta, Tunisia, the Bahamas, Latvia, Namibia and New Zealand.

The US Senate has approved Trump’s nominees for ambassadors to China, Japan, Canada, Mexico, France, Israel, Britain, Ireland, Turkey and Panama, allowing those diplomats to take up their posts at embassies in their host countries.

Michael Green, chief executive of the University of Sydney’s United States Studies Centre, said that Canberra remained a “coveted posting” in Washington, with high-profile former members of Congress and Republican donors lobbying to be appointed to the position.

“Trump is making them work for it and is not rushing to decide,” said Green, who served as a senior official in George W. Bush’s administration.

Michael Shoebridge, who served as a senior defence policy official at the Australian embassy in Washington, said the lack of an ambassadorial appointment was part of a “disturbing pattern” of a lack of engagement between the Albanese government and Trump administration, including the lack of a leaders’ meeting.

“We are clearly low down their priority list,” said Shoebridge, a director at the Strategic Analysis Australia think tank.

He noted that Trump’s predecessor Joe Biden appointed a member of Democratic Party royalty, Caroline Kennedy, as US ambassador to emphasise the importance of the relationship, although that appointment took almost a year to announce.

Shoebridge said that personal relationships were more important than ever in the Trump era, given the president did not place the same importance on alliances and traditional policy processes as his predecessors.

“You can’t coast on past relationships and value. It’s all about: what have you done for me lately?” he said. “It’s up to Australia to make the case for why we matter in the relationship now, and we’re not doing that.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109464

File: 0424bcc2f6685a4⋯.jpg (263.64 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23415362 (021127ZAUG25) Notable: COMMENTARY: In national interest, China must be a key climate ally"We can outlast warmongers like Putin … but we cannot outrun the far greater existential collapse of climate change. The United States is going backwards on climate, while China is accelerating the manufacture and deployment of renewable technologies at a speed the world desperately needs … Turning our backs on China’s decarbonisation would not just be self-defeating. It would be a missed opportunity … Peaceful, firm and respectful relationships with our neighbours is not a choice, but a necessity … Serious countries do not undermine their leader when they are representing the nation on the world stage. That’s not politics. That’s patriotism." – Andrew Forrest, The Australian

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109337

>>109397

>>109401

COMMENTARY: In national interest, China must be a key climate ally

ANDREW FORREST - July 29, 2025

1/2

I love my country to my core and will defend it at any cost. I grew up in the great Australian Outback and fell heavily for the land we call our own. I’ve been a builder and creator for as long as I can remember, which led to the creation of Fortescue – Australia’s largest and most successful business – and its beneficiary, Minderoo Foundation, a $9 billion philanthropy, one of the largest in the Asia-Pacific.

Every fibre of my being is committed to building our national wealth and protecting Australians from the greatest threat we face.

We can outlast warmongers like Putin on the battlefield, but we cannot outrun the far greater existential collapse of climate change.

I throw everything I have at heading off global climate change. Why? Because it’s accelerating and hurting every single Australian, especially the poorest.

Quick and shallow analysis might try to belittle that as a conflict of interest, but it’s anything but. It’s walking the talk. It’s the hard yards. It’s throwing everything you have into what you believe is critical for every Australian.

When I think of national interest – an esoteric term adopted by some as a veil to hide any manner of sins – I think differently. I think of the best interests of every single Australian child, woman and man, and how responsible economic growth can contribute to this, not against it.

The propagation of oil and gas is hurting every person on this planet.

The United States is going backwards on climate, while China is accelerating the manufacture and deployment of renewable technologies at a speed the world desperately needs. Almost 75 per cent of all solar and wind power projects being built globally are in China.In May, China installed 93 gigawatts of solar capacity – almost 100 solar panels every second. This is economic pragmatism, freeing China from the nation-draining costs of imported fossil fuel.

Turning our backs on China’s decarbonisation would not just be self-defeating. It would be a missed opportunity to be part of the massive economic growth and the most consequential industrial transformation of humanity.

Yet armchair warriors such as Peter Jennings say Australia should pull up the drawbridge with China – just at the very moment in time when global economic collaboration has never been more critical.

Peaceful, firm and respectful relationships with our neighbours is not a choice, but a necessity. Picking sides and choosing favourites isn’t selfless – it’s quite the opposite. We only have one side: Australia.

Those same armchair critics would do well to get on a plane to China. In the lobbies they will see businesspeople from all over the world – but mainly Americans.

For all the sabre rattling and the encouragement of a new Cold War, we forget that China is critical to global supply chains and critical to stopping climate change.

In fact, this opposition echoes those who opposed Nixon and Kissinger’s opening to China. Critics at the time warned it would “legitimise a communist regime” and empower a rival. In hindsight, it was a strategic masterstroke, weakening the Soviet Union and reshaping global diplomacy to favour freedom.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109465

File: 2fc4869e30c40b4⋯.jpg (376.49 KB,2166x1355,2166:1355,Clipboard.jpg)

File: e87f689d36bcb99⋯.jpg (236.84 KB,1015x1002,1015:1002,Clipboard.jpg)

File: eb6aa7365a731a4⋯.jpg (508.41 KB,2500x1563,2500:1563,Clipboard.jpg)

File: f958cb8d4ee99cb⋯.jpg (452.82 KB,2500x1567,2500:1567,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23415394 (021158ZAUG25) Notable: Inside the Australian port at the heart of China-US power struggle – One part of Darwin Harbour hosts the key naval base HMAS Coonawarra, where some of the world’s largest warships have docked, including, most recently, the UK’s HMS Prince of Wales. The other part, however, is occupied under a 99-year lease by Landbridge Group, a Chinese company whose billionaire owner, Ye Chang, has close ties to the ruling communist party. This split has raised concerns over military security as Indo-Pacific tensions rise. Analysts warn Chinese control curbs allied operations, despite reviews finding “no basis for security concerns.” The US has expanded its Marine Rotational Force in Darwin and used the harbour during Talisman Sabre 2025 drills, highlighting its strategic value in deterring conflict over Taiwan. Experts argue Australia must retake the port before crisis, warning legal powers to do so in wartime would be too late.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109325

>>109336

>>109385

>>109320

Inside the Australian port at the heart of China-US power struggle

Experts fear risk to key military facility from Beijing-linked billionaire’s company as Indo-Pacific threat levels rise

Allegra Mendelson - 30 July 2025

1/3

Down a sandy, dirt road on the outskirts of Darwin in Australia’s Northern Territory lies one of the US and Australia’s most important military assets – but there’s a catch.

Written in large letters high above the entrance are the words ‘Landbridge Darwin Port’ in Chinese.

One part of the harbour here – the largest in Australia’s largely uninhabited northern coast – hosts the key naval base HMAS Coonawarra, where some of the world’s largest warships have docked, including, most recently, the UK’s HMS Prince of Wales.

The other part, however, is occupied under a 99-year lease by Landbridge Group, a Chinese company whose billionaire owner, Ye Chang, has close ties to the ruling communist party.

The Australian government has been working behind the scenes to bring the port under domestic control amid growing fears of a war in the Indo-Pacific. It would be central to any future conflict between China and Taiwan.

And as one UK defence source told The Telegraph this week, threat levels in the Indo-Pacific are the “highest in the world”.

A Telegraph request to visit the commercial port was denied by the Chinese owners. When we approached the gates and asked to enter, we were turned away.

The ownership of the commercial port has been embroiled in controversy since the lease was signed in 2015.

Successive Australian governments have highlighted the risks of a Chinese company controlling such a strategically important military asset, and have vowed to bring it back under Australian control, but to little avail.

The presence of a Chinese company with prying eyes stationed so close to the naval base has meant the US and Australia have been concerned about expanding their military operations at Darwin. They don’t want to run the risk of classified intelligence or military assets – such as fighter jet parts - being handled by a Chinese-owned port operator.

For now, China, maintains the upper hand over the port through Landbridge. That, however, hasn’t stopped the US and its allies from building up their presence elsewhere in Darwin as part of a greater strategy to spread out and reinforce troops across the Indo-Pacific.

“Darwin is the front door for Australia and our military into the region,” Michael Shoebridge, a former Australian intelligence officer, said.

Location key to preventing war

Darwin’s strategic role in the Indo-Pacific has long been on display during Australia’s annual military exercises known as Talisman Sabre. This year, the drills were the largest yet, with tens of thousands of troops involved from 19 countries, including the US and the UK.

Vice Admiral Justin Jones, the chief of joint operations with the Australian Defence Force, said over the weekend that one of the objectives of the exercises was to “test our posture” by “force flowing all of those 42,000 people and assets into the country and out again”.

Darwin’s significance isn’t only hypothetical – building up capabilities in Darwin and elsewhere in the region could be key to preventing a war over Taiwan altogether. China, which claims sovereignty over Taiwan, has threatened to use force to “reunify the motherland”.

The government in Taipei strongly rejects Beijing’s claims, but persistent threats and increasing use of coercion by Xi Jinping, the Chinese president, have turned the Indo-Pacific into one of the world’s most highly anticipated flashpoints.

“A key part of the foreign policy… is to stop a potential Chinese invasion of Taiwan in the first place by deterring it and all the bases throughout the Pacific are a means of providing that deterrent effect,” said Neil James, the executive director of the watchdog organisation Australia Defence Association.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109466

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23419003 (030648ZAUG25) Notable: Revealed: Former Knox student allegedly made videos at childcare centres – Former Knox Grammar student and ex-NSW police employee David William James, 26, has been charged with producing child abuse material involving 10 boys aged five and six at six Sydney childcare centres. The Australian Federal Police said more than 1000 families have been contacted, with a hotline established after his identity was revealed in court. Investigators allege James filmed children in bathrooms and found material among 142,000 files seized from his devices. He remains in custody on 12 offences, while authorities confirm he held a valid Working With Children Check., MISSING MEDIA/FILES: David_James_in_a_photograph_published_on_social_media_in_2015.jpg, Acting_Assistant_Commissioner_Brett_James.jpg

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109450

Revealed: Former Knox student allegedly made videos at childcare centres

JOANNA PANAGOPOULOS - August 01, 2025

1/2

A childcare worker who allegedly produced child abuse material of 10 children in his care across six different Sydney after-school centres has been identified as a former star Knox Grammar student.

Artarmon man David William James, 26, who was previously also employed by NSW Police, has been charged with filming boys aged between five and six to make child-abuse material videos.

It comes as parents are still reeling from allegations Victorian man Joshua Brown, who worked at 20 childcare centres across ­Melbourne, was charged with 70 child sex offences.

It is alleged Mr James stood behind the boys while they were at the urinal, and in other videos masturbated behind them, according to court documents seen by The Australian.

More than 1000 parents and carers from the six centres – a number of which are owned by Junior Adventures Group – where Mr James allegedly produced the material, were contacted last month.

But authorities have today notified the other 52 out-of-hours school services where Mr James worked between March 2018 and September 2024. The Australian Federal Police say they do not believe any alleged offending took place at those centres.

Authorities have also created a website listing every centre, which are largely based in Sydney’s north, and the dates he worked there.

According to his year 12 yearbook Mr James participated in many co-curricular activities at the school, including cadets, multiple choirs, dance, drama, Symphonic Wind Ensemble, and had received awards for multiple academic achievements.

He was also part of the old boys’ bag pipes band in the years after he graduated in 2017.

When contacted, Knox said “the AFP has assured us that we are not being investigated as part of the David James matter”.

The six childcare centres where the alleged offending took place included Willoughby Kids House, where he worked for one day, Helping Hands – St Ives Public School, Helping Hands – Lane Cove West, Pyrmont OSHC – City of Sydney, OSHClub – Barker College, and St Ives OSHC Centre – KIDZONE.

In a statement, Junior Adventure Centres, which runs three of the centres where the alleged abuse took place, said they were “also only just finding out details of alleged offences, with the Non-Publication Order (NPO) being lifted today”.

“We fully understand how distressing this matter is, and we share the immense upset and concern surrounding it. We have been co-operating with police and doing all that we can to assist them in their investigation. We are now contacting all our parents at the centres the AFP has listed,” the statement said.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109467

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23419010 (030656ZAUG25) Notable: Equality Australia joins fight against female-only spaces – Equality Australia has applied to join Roxanne Tickle’s Federal Court appeal against Giggle app founder Sall Grover, backing claims female-only spaces are unlawful if they exclude trans women. The group’s intervention puts it alongside Sex Discrimination Commissioner Anna Cody and against the Lesbian Action Group, which argues sex is binary. Grover alleged the case is a planned “test” by activist Teddy Cook and said Equality Australia is opposing lesbians’ rights. The appeal, beginning August 4, will consider definitions of “sex” and whether Grover should pay Tickle damages., MISSING MEDIA/FILES: Sall_Grover_left_and_Roxanne_Tickle_right.jpg, Social_media_post_by_Roxanne_Tickle_showing_Ms_Tickle_with_trans_activist_Teddy_Cook_in_2021.jpg

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109282

>>109297

Equality Australia joins fight against female-only spaces

STEPHEN RICE - July 28, 2025

1/2

The powerful gay and trans rights advocacy group Equality Australia, which counts Governor-­General Sam Mostyn as patron, is bidding to join transgender woman Roxanne Tickle in her court battle to establish that ­female-only spaces are unlawful if they exclude trans women.

Equality Australia has applied to the Federal Court for leave to appear next week in support of Ms Tickle’s case against Giggle app founder Sall Grover, who was found last year to have unlawfully rejected Ms Tickle from the ­female-only networking platform because she was a biological man.

In what is shaping to be the ­nation’s most consequential legal battle over trans and women’s rights, Equality Australia is challenging the proposition advanced by Ms Grover – and by the Lesbian Action Group – that sex is a binary biological reality.

The intervention by Equality Australia in Ms Grover’s appeal reveals the depth of division in the LGBTIQ+ community sparked by the landmark case. Equality Australia’s request to appear as intervener, or alternatively amicus curiae (friend of the court), is in direct response against submissions filed by the Lesbian Action Group.

The long-established lesbian group is now pitted against both Equality Australia and Sex Discrimination Commissioner Anna Cody, who has already been granted amicus curiae status in the case and whose position mirrors Ms Tickle’s.

Ms Grover told The Australian she believed the direct support from Equality Australia and its chair of Trans Equality, activist Teddy Cook, was designed from the start to create a strategic test case to establish that female-only spaces are unlawful, and in doing so to erode both women’s and LGB rights under the Sex Discrimination Act.

It appears Ms Tickle’s association with Mr Cook predates her action against Ms Grover and Giggle. Ms Tickle posted a picture of herself with Mr Cook – who was then a community health director with ACON – on social media on November 21, 2021, two weeks before lodging her first complaint against Ms Grover with the Human Rights Commission.

“That tells me it was legal activism, it was planned,” Ms Grover said. “One thing I know for sure is that before Tickle went on the app, he knew who I was, what my stance on female-only spaces (was), and then he went on the app – so I was his perfect sitting duck, I just didn’t know it.”

Mr Cook was the subject of the recent case in which Elon Musk’s X successfully appealed against a takedown order issued by eSafety Commissioner Julie Inman Grant over a social media post last year by Canadian activist Chris Elston.

Mr Elston had slammed the proposed appointment of Mr Cook, a biological female, to a World Health Organisation panel on healthcare delivery. His tweet linked to a Daily Mail article that made reference to Mr Cook’s use of private social media accounts to post material relating to bestiality, public nudity, bondage parties and transgender orgies.

The eSafety order was set aside by the Administrative Review Tribunal, which ruled that although the post was offensive it was “consistent with views Mr Elston has expressed elsewhere in circumstances where the expression of the view had no malicious intent”.

Mr Cook referred questions from The Australian to Equality Australia.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109468

File: 53d5f34219a1f05⋯.jpg (276.41 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 0407d66c408142d⋯.jpg (713.78 KB,2048x2730,1024:1365,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23419015 (030704ZAUG25) Notable: Signal boss warns app will exit Australia if forced to hand over users’ encrypted messages – Signal president Meredith Whittaker said the messaging app would quit Australia rather than create a “backdoor” for authorities, warning it would “poison the body” of global communications by undermining encryption. She cited risks for journalists and dissidents if one jurisdiction weakens privacy, arguing “for many people, private communication is the difference between life and death.” ASIO chief Mike Burgess has pressed tech firms to unlock encrypted platforms, while Whittaker condemned governments and big tech for expanding surveillance and deploying “reckless” AI systems.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109412

>>109413

>>109444

>>>/qresearch/23402364

Signal boss warns app will exit Australia if forced to hand over users’ encrypted messages

JARED LYNCH - July 29, 2025

1/2

Signal president Meredith Whittaker is prepared to withdraw the privacy-focused messaging app from Australia — saying she hopes it doesn’t become a “gangrenous foot” by poisoning its entire platform by forcing it to hand over its users’ encrypted data to authorities.

Ms Whittaker says Signal would take the “drastic step” of leaving any market where a government compelled it to create a “backdoor” to access its data, saying it would create a vulnerability that hackers and authoritative regimes could exploit, undermining Signals’ “reason for existing”.

Pressure has been mounting on Signal and other secure messaging platforms. ASIO director general Mike Burgess has urged tech companies to unlock encrypted messages to assist terrorism and national security investigations, saying offshore extremists use such platforms to communicate.

But Ms Whittaker argues it is a slippery slope that threatens to erode fundamental human rights, highlighting the plight of another Burgess – Jessica Burgess of Nebraska in the US.

Ms Burgess was sentenced to two years’ jail in 2023 for helping her 17-year-old daughter have an illegal abortion. Facebook direct messages formed a key part of the prosecution’s evidence.

“She helped her daughter obtain and deal with the aftermath of abortion care … after the Supreme Court’s Dobbs ruling allowed Nebraska to criminalise access to reproductive care,” Ms Whittaker said.

“And why was she convicted? Because Meta turned over her Facebook DMs that were used as key evidence.”

In a wide-ranging interview with this masthead, Ms Whittaker warned of the encroachment of governments on the privacy of citizens, as well as big tech stockpiling personal data and their “reckless” use of artificial intelligence on mobile phones and laptops.

Signal, which operates as a not-for-profit and is funded largely by donations and grants, has surged in popularity this year after The Atlantic published details of a group chat in which US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth shared attack plans with a group that included key members of the Trump administration.

The Atlantic’s editor-in-chief was added to the chat, which revealed attack plans against the Iran-aligned Houthi rebel group, highlighting how much the app has become trusted among Washington’s elite.

It competes with Meta’s WhatsApp and Apple’s iMessage and holds its own with an annual budget of about $US50m. Its appeal is it collects virtually no user data and makes it difficult to discover others on Signal.

“You could come to my house, put a gun to my head, saying, ‘give me the data’. I could not give you the data. You would have to shoot because I don’t have it. I don’t have access to it,” Ms Whittaker said.

“Our commitment to end-to-end encryption, maintaining robust, technically guaranteed privacy for everyone who uses Signal never wavers. That’s the reason we exist.

“Our ability to make good on that commitment, for the people of Australia who depend on our services – often for very high stakes communication where there is real risk involved – does face threats from legislation.”

Ms Whittaker says such laws that would force Signal to create backdoor in its system to access users’ encrypted messages would undermine its privacy guarantees and force it to consider ‘taking a drastic move, like leaving the market’.

“Let’s hope Australia doesn’t become a gangrenous foot. Ultimately, we would hurt the people who rely on us if we leave a market – we don’t do that lightly. There are hundreds of thousands, millions, of people in Australia who rely on Signal.

“So we would only do that (leave) as a last resort. But again, we must do it because if you let the gangrene spread, you poison the body.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109469

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23419110 (030745ZAUG25) Notable: U.S. Embassy Australia Tweets: (Video) @FBIDirectorKash visited Sydney, Australia, to engage in high-level law enforcement meetings aimed at strengthening international partnerships and addressing shared security challenges. These discussions focus on combating transnational crime, cyber threats, and other global issues that require close collaboration with international allies. Building strong partnerships is vital to ensuring a safer and more secure future for all. - #uswithaus @FBI @AusFedPolice @ASIO @nswpolice @MarineCommand @scg

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109299

‘Spying at unprecedented levels’: ASIO boss sounds alarm on espionage threat

Matthew Knott - July 31, 2025

1/2

The nation’s top spy boss has revealed espionage is costing Australia an estimated $12.5 billion a year as foreign operatives mount increasingly audacious attempts to pilfer highly sensitive defence and business secrets.

ASIO director-general Mike Burgess said the organisation had disrupted 24 major espionage and foreign interference operations in the past three years – more than the previous eight years combined. Yet more than 35,000 Australians have exposed themselves to danger by “recklessly” boasting on professional networking sites that they have access to sensitive information.

Burgess revealed that spies recently gained access to official Australian documents on free trade negotiations by recruiting someone with a security clearance, while others convinced a state bureaucrat to obtain the names and addresses of dissidents being targeted by a foreign regime.

Spies have also hacked into the computer network of a major Australian exporter to gain an advantage in negotiations, tried to place an agent in a media organisation by masquerading as a researcher and stolen tree branches from a horticultural facility to reverse-engineer Australian research.

“Nation states are spying at unprecedented levels, with unprecedented sophistication,” Burgess said while delivering the Hawke Oration in Adelaide on Thursday, a speech named in honour of the late Labor prime minister.

“ASIO is seeing more Australians targeted – more aggressively – than ever before.”

Burgess said that foreign spies were taking a “very unhealthy” interest in the AUKUS defence pact, describing Australia’s defence sector as “a top intelligence collection priority for foreign governments seeking to blunt our operational edge, gain insights into our operational readiness and tactics, and better understand our allies’ capabilities”.

“Targets include maritime and aviation-related military capabilities, but also innovations with both commercial and military applications,” he said.

“Foreign intelligence services are proactive, creative and opportunistic in their targeting of current and former defence employees: relentless cyber espionage, in-person targeting and technical collection.

“In recent years, for example, defence employees travelling overseas have been subjected to covert room searches, been approached at conferences by spies in disguise and given gifts containing surveillance devices.”

Burgess said that “a particularly aggressive and creative intelligence service” had created fake online job ads, advertising well-paid jobs for people with expertise in geopolitics or defence to try to gain access to sensitive information.

The spy boss called for a national “awakening” on the threat of espionage, saying he was alarmed that 35,000 Australians indicated on a professional networking site such as LinkedIn that they had access to sensitive and potentially classified information.

“Nearly two and a half thousand [Australians] publicly boast about having a security clearance and 1300 claim to work in the national security community,” he said.

“While these numbers have fallen since I first raised the alarm two years ago, this still makes my head spin ... I get that people need to market themselves, but telling social media you hold a security clearance or work on a highly classified project is more than naive; it’s recklessly inviting the attention of a foreign intelligence service.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109470

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23419114 (030748ZAUG25) Notable: Video: Spies hunt AUKUS secrets, deliver $12.5bn hit to economy – ASIO director-general Mike Burgess warned espionage is costing Australia $12.5 billion a year, with agents targeting AUKUS technologies amid “unprecedented” foreign spy activity. He said China, Russia, Iran and other states are seeking to compromise defence, trade and critical infrastructure, with examples including hacking networks, fake job ads, and a delegate stealing plant material to replicate decades of research. Burgess revealed 24 major espionage operations were disrupted in three years and vowed ASIO will help defend AUKUS to ensure it is “delivered without compromise.”

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109299

>>109469

Spies hunt AUKUS secrets, deliver $12.5bn hit to economy

GEOFF CHAMBERS - July 31, 2025

1/2

Spy chief Mike Burgess has warned foreign agents are hunting AUKUS secrets amid “unprecedented” espionage activity that has delivered a one-year hit to the economy of more than $12.5bn.

In a major speech on Thursday night, Mr Burgess revealed details of previously undisclosed spy cases and released an inaugural “cost of espionage” report highlighting threats confronting governments, the private sector and high-value individuals targeted by nation states.

The report prepared by ASIO and the Australian Institute of Criminology, which was granted access to classified material and government departments, showed a conservative espionage cost to the economy of at least $12.5bn in 2023-24, with tens of billions of dollars in additional damage prevented by foiling spy plots.

As the US Defence Department conducts a review into the AUKUS nuclear submarine and military technologies pact, Mr Burgess used his Hawke Lecture in Adelaide to raise alarm over foreign intelligence services and agents seeking to potentially “compromise” the defence agreement.

In the speech, which outlines the industrial scale of foreign espionage and spy activity targeting Australians at home and abroad, the Australian Security Intelligence Organisation director-general said “you would be genuinely shocked by the number and names of countries trying to steal our secrets”.

“The obvious candidates are very active – I've previously named China, Russia and Iran – but many other countries are also targeting anyone and anything that could give them a strategic or tactical advantage, including sensitive but unclassified information,” Mr Burgess said.

Mr Burgess – who warned espionage activity had surged to “unprecedented levels” eclipsing the Cold War era – said “we are seeing foreign intelligence services taking a very unhealthy interest in AUKUS and its associated capabilities”.

“With AUKUS, we are not just defending our sovereign capability. We are also defending critical capability shared by and with our partners,” he said.

The Australian last year revealed the Australian Federal Police had established a new AUKUS Command and was working closely with the Department of Defence and Australian Submarine Agency to shield nuclear submarine secrets and protect key personnel, technology and submariners.

As current and former Australian Defence Force and department personnel are targeted by foreign intelligence services using a range of espionage tradecraft, Mr Burgess said spies should expect to be arrested if they attempt to “compromise AUKUS”.

“Foreign intelligence services already consider Australia a difficult operating environment and I am determined ASIO will continue to play its part to make it even less hospitable. We will help defend AUKUS to ensure it is delivered without compromise.”

“The commonwealth government is also well attuned to the espionage challenge – not just in Defence but more broadly. It fully backs ASIO as Australia's spy catcher.”

While violent extremism remains a top priority for ASIO after the national terrorism threat level was lifted last year to ‘probable’, which means a greater than 50 per cent chance of an onshore attack or terror plot, Mr Burgess said a “new iteration of great power competition is driving a relentless hunger for strategic advantage and an insatiable appetite for inside information”.

“Russia remains a persistent and aggressive espionage threat. Last year, two Russian-born Australian citizens were arrested and charged with an espionage-related offence.

“Separately, I can confirm in 2022 a number of undeclared Russian intelligence officers were removed from this country. The decision followed a lengthy ASIO investigation that found the Russians recruiting proxies and agents to obtain sensitive information, and employing sophisticated tradecraft to disguise their activities.

“But Russia is by no means the only country we have to deal with. Espionage can be small-scale and it can be industrial-scale. Spies can be opportunistic and spies can be patient, masquerading as diplomats, journalists, academics, business people and other professionals to conduct sophisticated, multi-year campaigns.”

Mr Burgess revealed ASIO had “detected and disrupted countless examples of all these things: 24 major espionage and foreign interference disruptions in the last three years alone – more than the previous eight years combined … and they are just the major disruptions; there have been many other cases”.

He said spies had recruited a security clearance holder who handed over official documents on free trade negotiations, foreign companies linked to intelligence services had sought to buy land near sensitive military sites, and revealed a state bureaucrat obtained names and addresses of designated “dissidents” from a database.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109471

File: f8cbbbc6f584fb1⋯.jpg (279.87 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: a90e1864d51585a⋯.jpg (2.47 MB,3665x5497,3665:5497,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 2d2b4b496650a7b⋯.jpg (897.83 KB,927x1495,927:1495,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23419131 (030758ZAUG25) Notable: Spy agency cracking down on ‘reckless’ boasts by people with top-secret clearance – ASIO will ban top-secret clearance holders from posting about their status on social media after Mike Burgess warned 35,000 Australians had exposed themselves by boasting of access to sensitive information online. Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke said anyone breaching the rule would lose clearance, stressing espionage costs Australia $12.5 billion a year. He said spies target both government and commercial secrets and urged discretion. Burgess revealed ASIO disrupted 24 major operations in three years, including spies recruiting a clearance holder to hand over trade documents.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109299

>>109469

>>109470

Spy agency cracking down on ‘reckless’ boasts by people with top-secret clearance

Brittany Busch - August 1, 2025

Top-secret security-clearance holders will be banned from posting about their position on social media in a move to protect the country from the $12.5 billion-a-year threat of espionage.

ASIO director-general Mike Burgess said on Thursday that more than 35,000 Australians had exposed the country to danger by “recklessly” implying on professional networking sites they had access to sensitive information, with almost 2500 people declaring they had a security clearance.

Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke said on Friday that stricter conditions would be enforced to stamp out the practice after the government moved responsibility for the highest levels of clearance to ASIO from Burke’s department, which handles lower-level security passes.

“What ASIO is going to start doing with those top secret clearances is just make it a condition [to not post about it online],” he told ABC’s News Breakfast.

“And if you start putting it up on social media, then what you put up on social media will no longer be true because you won’t hold the clearance any more. If you’re going to have a top-secret clearance, you need to show that you’re worthy of it.”

Burke said the government had given similar advice to security-clearance holders after the issue was first raised by Burgess in 2023, resulting in an 85 per cent reduction in the number of people boasting of security clearances online.

He said Australians needed to be aware that spies wanted to steal both commercial and government secrets.

“It doesn’t all have to be defence and military. A lot of it could be commercial information,” he said. “It doesn’t mean you treat everybody with paranoia or anything like that, but you be discreet. And you work on the basis that if information’s confidential, it’s confidential for a reason.”

Analysis from the Australian Institute of Criminology and ASIO revealed by Burgess on Thursday estimated that foreign espionage cost the country $12.5 billion in 2023-2024.

Burke said he understood people’s desire to market themselves to potential employers, but he declared that foreign spies should not be able to identify targets simply by Googling.

Burgess said in his speech on Thursday night that ASIO had disrupted 24 major espionage and foreign interference operations in the past three years – more than in the previous eight years combined.

He revealed that spies had recently gained access to official Australian documents on free trade negotiations by recruiting someone with a security clearance, while others convinced a state bureaucrat to obtain the names and addresses of dissidents being targeted by a foreign regime.

https://www.theage.com.au/politics/federal/spy-agency-cracking-down-on-reckless-boasts-by-people-with-top-secret-clearance-20250801-p5mjhh.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109472

File: 5c211a333fe6388⋯.jpg (857.2 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 4a57dcf0b36f56b⋯.jpg (233.66 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23419154 (030813ZAUG25) Notable: Epstein associate Ghislaine Maxwell transferred to lower-security prison facility – Ghislaine Maxwell has been moved from a Florida prison to a minimum-security camp in Texas, where Theranos founder Elizabeth Holmes is also held. Her lawyer confirmed the transfer but gave no reason. The move followed a nine-hour interview with Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche, who granted conditional immunity as she answered questions on about 100 people linked to Jeffrey Epstein. Trump said he had not considered clemency, though Maxwell faces a congressional subpoena. Lawmakers agreed to delay questioning until the Supreme Court rules on her appeal.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>73395 (pb)

>>109289

>>109443

Epstein associate Ghislaine Maxwell transferred to lower-security prison facility

C. RYAN BARBER AND SADIE GURMAN - August 02, 2025

1/2

Ghislaine Maxwell, the former associate of convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, has been transferred from a federal prison in Florida to a lower-security facility in Texas to serve her 20-year sentence, her lawyer said Friday.

Maxwell met last week with the Justice Department’s second-ranking official, Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche, for a two-day interview in Tallahassee, Fla. Blanche, who previously worked as President Trump’s criminal-defence lawyer, questioned Maxwell as the administration confronted criticism from Trump supporters who have called for the release of all files related to Epstein.

A Bureau of Prisons official and Maxwell’s lawyer, David Markus, confirmed her transfer to a minimum-security prison camp in Bryan, Texas, from a low-security prison in Tallahassee, but declined to comment on the reason for the move.

Among other high-profile inmates at the Texas camp is Theranos founder Elizabeth Holmes, who was sentenced in late 2022 to more than 11 years in prison after being found guilty of running a yearslong fraud scheme at her blood-testing company.

A Justice Department spokesman didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment.

Maxwell, a British socialite who once dated Epstein, was convicted in 2021 on sex trafficking and other offences for facilitating Epstein’s sexual abuse of underage teens.

She spoke with Blanche for roughly nine hours last week after receiving conditional immunity to discuss the case, a person familiar with the discussions said.

Blanche posted on social media that the Justice Department would share information about the interview “at the appropriate time”.

Maxwell’s lawyer estimated that she answered questions about roughly 100 people and said she “didn’t hold anything back”.

In the aftermath of the interview, Trump faced questions about whether he was considering commuting Maxwell’s sentence or granting her a pardon. “I’m allowed to do it, but it’s something I have not thought about,” Trump said.

House of Representatives lawmakers have subpoenaed Maxwell in hopes of questioning her. In the days before her transfer to the prison camp in Texas, Maxwell’s lawyer told lawmakers that she wouldn’t agree to answer their questions unless Congress met several conditions, including immunity, or Trump grants her clemency.

House Oversight Committee Chairman Rep. James Comer (R., Ky.), who sent the subpoena, said in a letter to Maxwell’s lawyer on Friday that it didn’t intend to grant her immunity nor share written questions in advance. However, the committee would delay her deposition until the Supreme Court decides whether to hear her appeal of her conviction, the letter said.

Markus, Maxwell’s lawyer, said he appreciated the committee’s willingness to delay its questioning.

“We will continue to engage with Congress in good faith to find a way for Ms. Maxwell to share her information without compromising her constitutional rights,” he said.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109473

File: 12b4ceb8ce248aa⋯.jpg (354.09 KB,1200x900,4:3,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 7aa9bced0691063⋯.jpg (618.02 KB,895x1627,895:1627,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23419171 (030823ZAUG25) Notable: Virginia Giuffre’s family expresses shock over Trump saying Epstein ‘stole’ her – The family of Virginia Giuffre said it was “shocking” to hear President Trump claim Jeffrey Epstein had “stolen” her from Mar-a-Lago, urging that Ghislaine Maxwell remain in prison. Giuffre, who accused Prince Andrew and others of sexual abuse while trafficked by Epstein, died by suicide this year. The family demanded answers, saying “survivors deserve this.” Trump’s office said he was answering a reporter’s question and noted he expelled Epstein from his club. The comments came after Maxwell’s DOJ interview, where she reportedly answered questions on about 100 people.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>73395 (pb)

>>109289

>>109443

>>109472

Virginia Giuffre’s family expresses shock over Trump saying Epstein ‘stole’ her

Mike Catalini - Jul 31, 2025

The family of Virginia Giuffre, who was among Jeffrey Epstein’s most well-known sex trafficking accusers, said that it was shocking to hear President Donald Trump say the disgraced financier “stole” Giuffre from him and urged that Epstein’s former girlfriend Ghislaine Maxwell remain in prison.

Giuffre, who had accused Britain’s Prince Andrew and other influential men of sexually exploiting her as a teenager trafficked by Epstein, has been a central figure in conspiracy theories tied to the case. She died by suicide this year.

Her family’s statement is the latest development involving Epstein, who took his own life in a New York jail in 2019 while facing federal sex trafficking charges, and the Republican president, who was his one-time friend. Trump denied prior knowledge of Epstein’s crimes and said he cut off their relationship years ago, but he still faces questions about the case.

Trump, responding to a reporter’s question on Tuesday, said that he got upset with Epstein over his poaching of workers and that Epstein had stolen Giuffre from his Palm Beach, Florida, club.

“It was shocking to hear President Trump invoke our sister and say that he was aware that Virginia had been ‘stolen’ from Mar-a-Lago,” the family’s statement said.

“We and the public are asking for answers; survivors deserve this,” it continued.

White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt noted the president was responding to a reporter’s question and didn’t bring up Giuffre himself.

“The fact remains that President Trump kicked Jeffrey Epstein out of his club for being a creep to his female employees,” she said.

The family’s statement comes shortly after the Justice Department interviewed Maxwell, who was convicted in 2021 on sex trafficking and other charges and is serving a 20-year sentence in Tallahassee, Florida. Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche interviewed Maxwell in a Florida courthouse, though details about what she said haven’t become public.

Maxwell’s lawyers have said she testified truthfully and answered questions “about 100 different people.” They have said she’s willing to answer more questions from Congress if she is granted immunity from future prosecution for her testimony and if lawmakers agree to satisfy other conditions.

A message seeking comment about the Giuffre family’s statement was sent to Maxwell’s attorney Thursday.

A Trump administration official said the president is not considering clemency action for Maxwell.

Giuffre said she was approached by Maxwell in 2000 and eventually was hired by her as a masseuse for Epstein. But the couple effectively made her a sexual servant, she said, pressuring her into gratifying not only Epstein but his friends and associates.

Giuffre said she was flown around the world for appointments with men including Prince Andrew while she was 17 and 18 years old.

The men, including Andrew, denied it and assailed Giuffre’s credibility. She acknowledged changing some key details of her account.

The prince settled with Giuffre in 2022 for an undisclosed sum, agreeing to make a “substantial donation” to her survivors’ organization.

The American-born Giuffre lived in Australia for years and became an advocate for sex trafficking survivors after emerging as a central figure in Epstein’s prolonged downfall.

Her family’s statement said she endured death threats and financial ruin over her cooperation with authorities against Epstein and Maxwell.

https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/virginia-giuffres-family-expresses-shock-over-trump-saying-epstein-stole-her

https://www.facebook.com/newshour/posts/the-family-of-virginia-giuffre-released-a-statement-on-thursday-expressing-their/1216280250367219/

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109474

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23419187 (030836ZAUG25) Notable: Video: Virginia Giuffre’s family says she would have wanted Epstein documents released – Virginia Giuffre’s relatives said she called for the release of Epstein-related documents before her death this year, with her sister-in-law Amanda Roberts recalling she “had been fighting that till her very last day.” The family criticised Trump for saying Epstein “stole” her from Mar-a-Lago, arguing she was “preyed upon … at President Trump’s property.” They condemned giving Ghislaine Maxwell a platform, saying she “deserves to rot in prison,” and warned immunity or clemency would betray survivors. Relatives demanded justice and answers about why the files remain sealed.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109289

>>109443

>>109472

>>109473

Virginia Giuffre’s family says she would have wanted Epstein documents released

Kaanita Iyer - AUG 1, 2025

1/2

The family of Virginia Giuffre — one of the women who accused Jeffrey Epstein of sex trafficking and who died by suicide earlier this year — said Thursday that she would have wanted documents related to the disgraced financier to be made public, as the Trump administration faces mounting pressure around the case.

Amanda Roberts, Giuffre’s sister-in-law, told CNN’s Kaitlan Collins on “The Source” that in one of their last conversations, Giuffre called for the release of the documents.

“She wanted the world to know what they’ve done to her and so many other survivors, and she had been fighting that till her very last day,” Roberts said.

Giuffre, a prominent Epstein accuser who also alleged that Britain’s Prince Andrew abused her when she was a teenager, died by suicide in April at the age of 41. In 2019, Epstein died awaiting trial on federal charges accusing him of sexually abusing underage girls. His death was ruled a suicide.

Prince Andrew repeatedly denied the claims.

President Donald Trump, who had decades-long ties to Epstein, said earlier this week that the sex offender poached young women from Mar-a-Lago, including Giuffre, who worked at Trump’s resort as a teenager.

“I think she worked at the spa,” Trump said of Giuffre. “I think that was one of the people, yeah. He stole her.”

Sky Roberts, Giuffre’s brother, on Thursday took issue with Trump’s use of the word “stole,” telling Collins, “She wasn’t stolen, she was preyed upon at his property, at President Trump’s property.”

“Stolen seems very impersonal, feels very much like an object, and these survivors are not objects,” Roberts said.

He added that Trump’s comments raise questions about “how much he knew during that time.”

The White House has said Trump barred Epstein from his Mar-a-Lago club “for being a creep.” Trump has not been accused of any wrongdoing in connection with Epstein.

Earlier Thursday, Giuffre’s family expressed shock and raised questions about Trump’s relationship with Epstein in a statement to CNN. Those comments were first reported by The Atlantic.

Sky Roberts on “The Source” also weighed in on a top Justice Department official meeting last week with Ghislaine Maxwell, Epstein’s accomplice who has also offered to testify before Congress, but with major conditions, including immunity.

Giuffre “was preyed upon by Ghislaine Maxwell, as well as many other predators out there. But she was preyed upon at Mar-a-Lago and we were very shocked and very surprised that they were giving her a voice and giving her a platform to essentially, possibly make a deal,” Sky Roberts said.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109475

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23419269 (030945ZAUG25) Notable: 100,000 march in Melbourne and Sydney to protest Israel’s bombardment of Gaza – More than 100,000 pro-Palestine demonstrators rallied on the Sydney Harbour Bridge and Melbourne’s King Street Bridge, demanding sanctions on Israel and condemning Gaza’s starvation. Protesters displayed images of malnourished children, chanting “free Palestine,” while organiser Mohammad Sharab urged calm, calling the movement “peaceful” and denouncing claims of extremism. Victoria Police deployed heavy riot units but confirmed no arrests. Activists including Samantha Ratnam and Basil El Ghattis said Labor faces pressure over military ties, while Premier Jacinta Allan and Opposition Leader Brad Battin warned of consequences for unlawful disruption.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109251

>>109425

>>109457

>>109458

100,000 march in Melbourne and Sydney to protest Israel’s bombardment of Gaza

Charlotte Grieve and Ashleigh McMillan - August 3, 2025

1/2

More than 100,000 pro-Palestine protesters marched on the Sydney Harbour Bridge and Melbourne’s King Street Bridge on Sunday, rallying against Israel’s bombardment of Palestine and calling for sanctions.

Local protest organisers estimate 25,000 people gathered in Melbourne, marching through the CBD before their demonstration concluded at the King Street bridge, which was blocked by a heavy police presence.

Protesters held photos of emaciated children and placards reading “Israel is starving Gaza” and “Starving children is a war crime” as they marched down Swanston Street, Bourke Street and King Street towards the bridge.

Several protesters did not want to be interviewed, citing fear of backlash from their employers or distrust in mainstream media reporting.

Angela Hunter said she attends the protests every second weekend to call for greater political leadership.

“I just feel so disappointed with this government,” she said. “We could do so much more. I don’t believe when they say we can’t do anything about it. It’s not only about killing children, it’s about killing all human beings. It’s devastating.”

Three heavy riot squad vans were at the front of the police line on the King Street Bridge, with mounted and riot police and a row of police cars behind. Aerial footage showed as many as 100 police assembled to block the crowd. Police were also seen steering boats along the Yarra River.

As the crowd approached the police line, organiser Mohammad Sharab called on protesters to “prove to the world that this is not a movement that will clash with police” and told them to stay back or sit down.

“We are sitting here for Palestine … peacefully,” he said. “We need to calm down, show everybody who we are. We have women, children, vulnerable people. We are responsible people.

“They are holding their guns, their weapons, against people who are protesting peacefully. Shame on Victoria Police, shame.”

One woman wearing a keffiyeh approached the police line to say “keep our children safe” and another protester told the heavily armed officers the police blockade was a “waste of taxpayer dollars”.

Protest marshals formed a line to keep distance between the police and protesters, that gathered and chanted “free Palestine” and “not a target”.

“Thank you for blocking the bridge. You did our job for us!” one masked protester shouted at the police.

Standing on the bridge a few metres from the police line, Kevin Bracken said he had attended most protests and all had been peaceful.

“It’s right over the top, isn’t it?” he said. “It’s sending the message, who runs Victoria? They couldn’t stop it in NSW, but the politicians here are puppet masters. This is about what’s happening in Gaza. This is about starving children.”

After the larger protest dispersed about 3pm, a small spin-off group stopped traffic and started burning an Australian flag and spray-painting “abolish Australia” on Spencer Street.

When asked whether they represent the broader protest movement, one person in a grey hoodie and black mask shook her head and walked away.

“We’re just concerned citizens,” said another. “No group.”

They chanted “too many coppers not enough justice” and “free Palestine” before police arrived and the crowd of less than one dozen people dispersed.

Earlier in the day, former Greens candidate for Wills Samantha Ratnam addressed the crowd to roaring applause and clanging pots, a symbol of food shortages in Gaza. She said Labor was feeling pressure amid rising calls for Israeli sanctions and greater scrutiny on contracts for military parts.

“The more they minimise us ... the more and more they’re being overwhelmed [by the] community telling them they’re on the wrong side of history,” she said.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109476

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23419310 (031005ZAUG25) Notable: Video: Julian Assange joins pro-Palestine march across Sydney Harbour Bridge before police stop rally citing safety fears – Tens of thousands marched in Sydney despite rain, with Julian Assange, Bob Carr, Ed Husic, Meyne Wyatt, Craig Foster and Mehreen Faruqi among attendees. Police texted the crowd to halt the rally over safety concerns, turning protesters back after estimating attendance at 100,000, though organisers claimed up to 300,000. Carr and Husic renewed calls for sanctions on Benjamin Netanyahu and recognition of Palestinian statehood, while Faruqi praised protesters for “defying Chris Minns.” Police and government figures had earlier warned of crowd crush and major disruption.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109251

>>109457

>>109458

>>109475

Julian Assange joins pro-Palestine march across Sydney Harbour Bridge before police stop rally citing safety fears

Indigenous actor Meyne Wyatt and former Socceroo and Australian of the Year Craig Foster among tens of thousands of people protesting in wet weather

Guardian staff - 3 Aug 2025

1/2

Tens of thousands of pro-Palestine marchers, including Julian Assange, Bob Carr and Ed Husic, have marched across Sydney Harbour Bridge in the rain to protest against Israel’s conduct in Gaza and to speak out about the children starving there.

The world-famous landmark was closed to traffic at 11.30am on Sunday, with protesters gathering in Lang Park in the city centre in chilly weather before walking north to Bradfield Park across the bridge.

About 3pm, NSW police sent out a mass text message to phones throughout the city ordering the pro-Palestine march to stop due to safety concerns, with authorities turning protesters around at the north end.

“Message from NSW Police: In consultation with the organisers, the march needs to stop due to public safety and await further instructions,” the message read.

A police helicopter hovered overhead with instructions for the hordes of protesters to turn around and walk back towards the city.

A second text message read: “After consultation with the protest organisers, we are asking that everyone stops walking north. As soon as the march has stopped, we will look at turning everyone around back towards the city BUT it needs to be done in a controlled way in stages to keep everyone safe.”

Crowd estimates varied. A spokesperson for rally organiser Palestine Action Group said police had informed them 100,000 people were in attendance – but the spokesperson estimated the figure was closer to 300,000.

Earlier, the Indigenous actor Meyne Wyatt and the former Socceroo and Australian of the Year Craig Foster were among tens of thousands of people marching in the wet weather, while the Greens senator Mehreen Faruqi spoke passionately before the walk began.

Faruqi, who has been an outspoken critic of the federal government’s action in relation to Israel’s conduct in Gaza, commended protesters for “defying Chris Minns” after the New South Wales premier said: “We cannot allow Sydney to descend into chaos.”

“Thank you for defying Chris Minns,” she said. “This is a man who wants you to stay home and be silent in the face of a genocide.

“It was never about logistics. It was never about traffic. It was never about communications or anything else. It was always about stopping us and silencing us. It was always about protecting Israel and the Labor government from accountability.”

Police had rejected an application from organisers for them to facilitate the march, arguing there was not enough time to prepare a traffic management plan and warned of a potential crowd crush and huge disruptions.

But on Saturday the NSW supreme court ruled the march could go ahead.

On Sunday protesters turned out carrying pots and pans – to highlight the starvation in Gaza – while many carried Palestinian flags and signage along with their wet weather gear and umbrellas.

One protester that Guardian Australia spoke to, a British man called Dan, held a sign reading “Gay Jews 4 Gaza”.

“I grew up in a north London Jewish community, and I think there’s a widespread Zionism that exists within the Jewish community that is difficult to separate from religion,” he said, adding: “I think it’s important for people within the community to stand up and raise their voice against the state of Israel because they’re not representative of the Jewish community as a whole.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109477

File: 9a460ce03caae96⋯.jpg (259.83 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 0fc501227cfe758⋯.jpg (846.92 KB,2044x2726,1022:1363,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 0f3b94dde747ebe⋯.jpg (124.86 KB,768x1024,3:4,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23423343 (040908ZAUG25) Notable: How ‘serial pest’ Josh Lees won the Battle of the Bridge - and closed it down – Activist Josh Lees, long branded a “professional protester,” secured a NSW Supreme Court ruling allowing the Harbour Bridge march, despite police warnings of gridlock, ambulance delays and violent clashes. Justice Belinda Rigg accepted Lees’ testimony that urgency over Gaza’s humanitarian crisis justified authorisation, citing his two decades of activism and community backing. The judgment noted 147 Gazans had died from starvation and 40,000 infants were at imminent risk. Lees, hailed by Red Flag as victorious over “forces of injustice,” left court waving the Palestinian flag.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109251

>>109475

>>109476

How ‘serial pest’ Josh Lees won the Battle of the Bridge – and closed it down

STEPHEN RICE - August 03, 2025

The most powerful man in Sydney on Sunday leads his pro-Palestine supporters across the Harbour Bridge basking in the global spotlight – and revelling in a sweet victory handed to him by the NSW Supreme Court.

Josh Lees, the 43-year-old Trotskyist who now calls the tune in the harbour city, has captured the nation’s most iconic landmark and plans to use the moment well into the future.

Even for a man who has led more than 85 protests around Sydney since the Hamas terror attack on Israel in October 2023, it was a remarkable feat.

The keffiyeh-wearing Lees has led a string of causes in the last two decades, his exploits on behalf of refugees, LGBTQI rights and against capitalism all breathlessly recorded in the Red Flag, his Socialist Alternative news outlet.

On Saturday night the Red Flag was hailing Lees’ court win as a triumph in the “test of wills between the forces of injustice and imperialism”.

When NSW Premier Chris Minns recently called Lees a “professional protester” he meant it as an insult.

But for NSW Supreme Court judge Belinda Rigg it was more like a professional qualification – one that trumped the experience of the senior police and transport experts pleading with her to stop the madness.

Lees had expertise, she said, noting his leading role in the protests that have so far tied up nearly 20,000 police – even before Sunday’s march – at a cost now estimated at well over $10 million.

Yes, Justice Rigg agreed, the consequences of the march could include violent scenes, traffic gridlocks, ambulances not getting to where they need to go, “and other undesirable consequences”.

Yes, police and transport officials had expressed grave safety concerns “due to the absence of any evidence of detailed planning by the organisers and limited considerations given to identifying safety risks”.

But Lees had “compellingly” explained the reasons “why he believes there is an urgency for a response to the humanitarian situation in Gaza”, she said.

“Mr Lees’ experience and activism for two decades, and his knowledge of the current support voiced to PAG suggests the groundswell of support in the community for the March for Humanity is much greater than (a previous incident) in 2020”, she said.

Justice Rigg said she accepted Lees’ view that on the timing of the march that “we are at a critical moment, on the issue of Palestinian rights not only due to the crisis in Gaza, itself, but also due to awareness of that crisis brought about by the horrific images, published in the media recently”.

“Mr Lees regards it as highly desirable in the current circumstances that the public assembly is authorised so as to provide structure, support and safety to those who participate.”

“Mr Lees’ evidence indicates that the timing and the lodging of this proposed march and its location is directly responsive to the dramatic increase in the known suffering of Gazan citizens over the last weeks.

“He states, ‘the March for Humanity is an urgent necessity demanded by the urgent situation in Gaza right now, where at least 147 people have died from starvation, and Gazan authorities warn 40,000 infants under the age of one are at imminent risk of death due to the lack of baby formula.”

Rarely has a professional protester been treated with such deference in the Supreme Court.

Lees walked away from the court waving the Palestinian flag. And making it very clear: this was just the beginning.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/how-serial-pest-josh-lees-won-the-battle-of-the-bridge-and-closed-it-down/news-story/8b98637d13d0c0d46e2f37932f4f421a

https://www.socialistalternative.org.au/

https://redflag.org.au/

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109478

File: 4a03410b2d9a09e⋯.jpg (550.92 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: ccb10edcde22b06⋯.jpg (433.2 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 9b7e74baa2989e1⋯.jpg (358.72 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 823f60b30fc5b2d⋯.jpg (986.3 KB,2048x2730,1024:1365,Clipboard.jpg)

File: a700db9985ad3ed⋯.jpg (281.17 KB,2048x1536,4:3,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23423365 (040922ZAUG25) Notable: Sydney Harbour Bridge pro-Palestine protest marred by Ayatollah image and traffic chaos – An estimated 90,000 protesters, led by Julian Assange, marched across the Harbour Bridge in heavy rain, closing it for over five hours and causing major traffic disruption. The event was marred when a demonstrator displayed an image of Iran’s Ayatollah Ali Khamenei behind Assange and other high-profile figures. Police raised safety fears after crowding at the northern end but no major incident occurred. Justice Belinda Rigg authorised the march, citing Gaza’s worsening humanitarian crisis. Protesters and figures such as Bob Carr demanded recognition of Palestinian statehood.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109251

>>109475

>>109476

>>109477

Sydney Harbour Bridge pro-Palestine protest marred by Ayatollah image and traffic chaos

STEPHEN RICE and JOANNA PANAGOPOULOS - 3 August 2025

1/2

In a procession drenched by pouring rain and occasionally marred by hateful images, an estimated 90,000 pro-Palestine protesters marched across Sydney Harbour Bridge on Sunday led by WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange.

The bridge was closed for more than five hours, throwing Sydney traffic into chaos, as the largely well-behaved protesters made their way from the CBD to North Sydney under a sea of umbrellas, Palestinian flags and crude anti-Israel signs. However, the “March for Humanity” was marred by a protester who held aloft a picture of Iranian dictator Ayatollah Ali Khamenei behind Assange and other prominent figures.

The picture of Khamenei, standing with a rifle, was clearly visible behind Assange as he marched alongside Greens senator Mehreen Faruqi, republican activist Craig Foster and former journalist Mary Kostakidis.

Assange, who was joined by his wife Stella and their two children, greeted former NSW premier and foreign minister Bob Carr but did not speak to the media.

Other high-profile attendees at the march included writer Randa Abdel-Fattah, radio presenter Antoinette Lattouf, Sydney Lord Mayor Clover Moore and former sportsman Anthony Mundine.

Small pockets of protesters chanted “all Zionists are terrorists” and “From the river to the sea, Palestine is all you see”.

The bridge march coincided with a warning by terror group Hamas that it would not lay down its arms until an independent Palestinian state was established, a move that will make it tougher for the federal government to formally recognise Palestine this year.

Hamas vowed to continue its armed struggle until Israel agreed to the establishment of a Palestinian state with full sovereignty and Jerusalem as its capital.

The statement came as a video emerged of an emaciated Israeli hostage, Evyatar David, digging what he fears is his own grave in a tunnel under Gaza and declaring he had just “a few days to live”.

In the video, the young musician who was kidnapped from the Nova musical festival, is also seen crossing off dates on a calendar drawn on sheets of paper and detailing when he has eaten – and when he has been starved.

In Melbourne, heavily armed police clashed with anti-Israel activists during a volatile pro-Palestinian protest in the CBD on Sunday, with officers verbally harassed and traffic brought to a standstill.

Victoria Police established a blockade on the King Street Bridge early in the day, deploying more than 100 officers, including riot police and mounted units, in anticipation of the demonstration.

Protesters responded with fury, chanting “Shame on you Jacinta Allan” and “Free, free Palestine” in defiance of the Premier’s warning that anyone blocking the bridge would be “dealt with swiftly”.

By midday, thousands had descended on the city, confronting officers in a tense standoff before spilling through the streets and staging rolling disruptions throughout the afternoon.

It was the first time Victoria Police were forced to come out in a show of force since the toxic Land Forces protest last year.

Several agitators were swept away from the crowd by police as the protesters continued to march towards the King Street Bridge guarded by more than 100 officers from the Public Order Response team, including 15 on horseback.

In Sydney, as people gathered at midday in Lang Park, protesters stomped on a sign that pictured a bloody Donald Trump and Benjamin Netanyahu next to the words “two killers”.

Stalls sold keffiyehs and Palestinian flags. Others held signs with Israeli leader Benjamin Netanyahu’s face on it with a Hitler moustache above the word “terrorist”.

Protesters remained spirited on the walk back across the bridge, some two to three hours later, continuing to chant and sing, but at one point were forced to stop in order to avoid a dangerous crowd crush at the northern end of the harbour bridge. One senior police officer said he had never seen a more perilous situation”.

“I was honestly worried that we were going to have a major incident with potential loss of life,” Acting Assistant Police Commissioner Adam Johnson said.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109479

File: d773e0998f65191⋯.jpg (3.06 MB,6000x4000,3:2,Clipboard.jpg)

File: c15f7f1e0d4749f⋯.jpg (1.79 MB,4926x3284,3:2,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23423380 (040932ZAUG25) Notable: Albanese seeks call with Netanyahu following Sydney, Melbourne protests – Prime Minister Anthony Albanese is pursuing a phone call with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu after 90,000 marched across the Harbour Bridge and 25,000 in Melbourne, pressing for recognition of Palestine. Albanese said he would use the call to advocate a two-state solution, while ruling out new sanctions beyond those already imposed. Ed Husic, Alison Byrnes and Tony Sheldon joined the protest, with Husic urging immediate recognition. Albanese praised the march as peaceful but said Australians “don’t want conflict brought here.” Critics warned of manipulation by extremist organisers.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109251

>>109475

>>109476

>>109478

Albanese seeks call with Netanyahu following Sydney, Melbourne protests

Nick Newling - August 4, 2025

1/2

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese is pursuing a phone call with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu after 90,000 people marched across the Sydney Harbour Bridge calling for an end to the war in Gaza, as pressure builds within Labor for recognition of Palestinian statehood.

Albanese said on Monday he would use any phone call with Netanyahu to advocate for a two-state solution. Assistant Immigration Minister Matt Thistlethwaite had earlier confirmed that the call was being pursued, as Labor politicians backed the peaceful protest organised by the Palestine Action Group, with at least three members of the federal caucus in attendance.

Backbenchers Ed Husic, Alison Byrnes and Tony Sheldon marched with protesters on Sunday, putting further pressure on Albanese to recognise Palestine.

At a press conference on Monday, Albanese said he would continue to advocate for peace with Netanyahu.

“I have said to prime minister Netanyahu before, as I’ve said publicly for a long period of time that I’m a supporter of a two-state solution, and that there can’t be peace and security in the Middle East, without there being an advance on that two-state solution,” Albanese said.

The government has repeatedly said that recognition of a Palestinian state is a matter of timing. Allies in France, Canada and the United Kingdom have all laid the groundwork to recognise the state at the next United Nations General Assembly in September.

Albanese ruled out any further sanctions against Israeli figures, following those already placed on ministers Itamar Ben-Gvir and Bezalel Smotrich in June for inciting violence against Palestinians in the West Bank.

Speaking about the Harbour Bridge protest, Albanese said he was not surprised so many felt moved to march after seeing images of “people being deprived of food and water and essential services” in Gaza.

“In a democracy, it’s a good thing that people peacefully express their views, and yesterday’s march was peaceful and was an opportunity for people to express their concern about what is happening in Gaza,” Albanese said.

“Australians want people to stop killing each other. They want peace and security. But the second thing they want is they don’t want conflict brought here.”

Thistlethwaite earlier condemned any forms of antisemitism or pro-Iran sentiments at the protest, telling Sky News that people holding images of Iran’s supreme leader Ali Khamenei were wrong.

“A phone call [with Netanyahu] is being pursued. I don’t believe that people should have been displaying photos of the Ayatollah Khamenei. I think that’s provocative,” he said.

“As long as you do it peacefully and in accordance with the law, which is what occurred on the weekend, then every Australian has the right to protest.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109480

File: 00c0973f8b93b11⋯.jpg (1.94 MB,4981x3321,4981:3321,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23423492 (041044ZAUG25) Notable: U.S. Embassy Australia Tweets: (Video) @FBIDirectorKash visited Sydney, Australia, to engage in high-level law enforcement meetings aimed at strengthening international partnerships and addressing shared security challenges. These discussions focus on combating transnational crime, cyber threats, and other global issues that require close collaboration with international allies. Building strong partnerships is vital to ensuring a safer and more secure future for all. - #uswithaus @FBI @AusFedPolice @ASIO @nswpolice @MarineCommand @scg

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

First woman appointed to lead Australian Federal Police as Reece Kershaw retires a year early

Olivia Ireland - August 4, 2025

Australian Federal Police Commissioner Reece Kershaw is retiring a year early to spend more time with his grandchildren, and will be replaced by the first woman to head the nation’s police force.

Deputy commissioner Krissy Barrett, who most recently oversaw the AFP’s national security portfolio, will replace Kershaw in October.

Kershaw’s early retirement comes after the police chief faced scrutiny over his handling of the Dural caravan plot in Sydney, which was first described as a terrorist act but was later revealed to be a fake plot by powerful crime figures to distract police and influence prosecutions.

The commissioner refused to answer questions at a hearing in February about whether he had briefed Prime Minister Anthony Albanese about the plot.

But in announcing Kershaw’s departure at a press conference in Canberra on Monday, Albanese and Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke said he would leave his role on good terms with the government after his six-year tenure.

“Commissioner Kershaw has made an extraordinary contribution to public life, and we are deeply grateful for his service,” Albanese said. “[He] has been absolutely on call 24 hours a day, seven days a week with his commitment to his fellow Australians.”

Burke said Kershaw was retiring with his head held high to spend more time with family.

“Commissioner Kershaw asked to meet with me with no staff present and in the meeting, to my surprise … said that he had set October 3 as the date that he was intending to retire,” Burke said.

Kershaw said his time as commissioner has taken its toll on his family but that he was grateful for his time with the AFP.

“Being a grandfather has changed me dramatically, and I need to be there for my family,” he said.

“We sacrifice a lot, in particular our family, including my wife’s own career. She gave up her career to support me, so it is time for me to give back.”

Former attorney-general Mark Dreyfus extended Kershaw’s term in May last year for two years to October 2026, instead of the usual five-year extension.

Government sources confirmed the two-year extension was because the police commissioner was not committed to a full term, but there was a view that none of the assistant commissioners were ready for the role. Barrett had impressed people with her national security work since then, prompting Kershaw to bring forward his retirement.

Barrett was the first choice for Albanese and Burke after Kershaw told them of his resignation.

“[Barrett] is highly renowned for her leadership capability, and I’ve certainly seen that firsthand in the dealings that I’ve had with Ms Barrett, as well as the way that she has represented the AFP on matters before the National Security Committee,” Albanese said.

The first woman to lead the AFP, Barrett has almost 25 years of experience dealing with community policing, counter-terrorism, financial crime and organised crime.

Barrett said she would be committed to championing all staff in the force, as she had started her career in the AFP as an administrative assistant, and acknowledged how the police were constantly responding to an ever-changing environment.

Asked about her view of the pro-Palestine protest across the Sydney Harbour Bridge on Sunday and how she would approach social cohesion given conflicts around the world, she said the AFP would continue to work closely with state police forces.

“I did say I would have more to say on my priorities going forward, but absolutely [social cohesion] is right at the top of the list,” she said.

Barrett has been recognised for her distinguished service to the Solomon Islands and the Bali bombings investigation. She received a Police Overseas Service Medal in 2004 and an Operations Medal in 2005.

https://www.theage.com.au/politics/federal/afp-commissioner-reece-kershaw-retires-a-year-early-20250804-p5mk79.html

https://qresear.ch/?q=Reece+Kershaw

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109481

File: 44788ab16c5a964⋯.jpg (167.18 KB,1280x720,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: bff5d253a6ae58f⋯.jpg (51.17 KB,1300x976,325:244,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 8848e66b4422998⋯.jpg (153.4 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23423505 (041058ZAUG25) Notable: Trans women should have legal protections available to pregnant women, court told – Sex Discrimination Commissioner Anna Cody has argued in a Federal Court submission that protections for “pregnant or potentially pregnant women” under the Sex Discrimination Act should extend to trans women, claiming the 2013 repeal of the definition of “woman” confirms inclusivity. The case, brought by trans woman Roxanne Tickle against Giggle app founder Sall Grover, will test whether “sex” is binary or changeable under the Act. Judges will also consider whether Equality Australia can intervene, alongside the Lesbian Action Group, which defends female-only spaces for biological women.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109282

>>109297

>>109467

Trans women should have legal protections available to pregnant women, court told

STEPHEN RICE - 3 August 2025

Trans women should be able to access legal protections available to “pregnant or potentially pregnant women”, the Sex Discrimination Commissioner has claimed in an extraordinary submission lodged with the Federal Court.

The submission is part of a bid to establish that the word “woman” in the Sex Discrimination Act is intended to include trans women, a key argument in the claim by trans woman Roxanne Tickle that Giggle app founder Sall Grover unlawfully rejected her from the platform because she looked like a man.

Ms Grover’s appeal against the finding that she discriminated against Ms Tickle begins on Monday, in a Federal Court hearing that will be live-streamed on YouTube.

In a submission lodged with the court late last week, Sex Discrimination Commissioner Anna Cody says the act expressly gives protection to “women” against discrimination on the grounds of a woman’s “pregnancy or potential pregnancy” - which includes “a desire to become pregnant, or that the woman is perceived as being likely to become pregnant”.

The repeal in 2013 of the definition of “woman”, suggests that a trans woman should be able to access protections related to pregnancy, the Sex Discrimination Commissioner argues, “which in turn confirms that the word ‘woman’ is intended to include a trans woman.”

Dr Cody does not discuss in her submission the biological capacity for a trans woman to become pregnant.

The argument highlights the challenges facing the Full Court – judges Melissa Perry, Geoffrey Kennett and Wendy Abraham – in deciding whether, under the Sex Discrimination Act “sex” is binary and established at birth, or non-binary and changeable.

On Monday the judges must first decide whether to allow the powerful gay and trans lobby group Equality Australia, led by chief executive and ex-Labor staffer Anna Brown, to intervene in the case in support of Ms Tickle.

The judges have already granted intervener status to the Lesbian Action Group, which argues that undermining the sex-based protections of the Sex Discrimination Act “denies autonomy, dignity and safety” to lesbians.

Biological women have a right under the Sex Discrimination Act to their own safe spaces, the Melbourne-based LAG says, because “it is now commonplace for lesbians to be pressured into having sex with trans women”.

Dr Cody has also been granted amicus curiae (friend of the court) status, her position generally mirroring Ms Tickle’s.

Equality Australia is also seeking to intervene in the case to put the case that female-only spaces are unlawful if they exclude trans women.

On Monday the court may also decide whether to allow into evidence an SBS television show in which Ms Tickle described how she realised she was transgender at the age of 26 because she didn’t like the smell of the male changing rooms.

Ms Grover wants the Insight program admitted because it is the basis of her claim that she should not have to pay the $10,000 damages awarded against her by judge Robert Bromwich last year because she had laughed at a reference to it in cross examination.

Ms Grover says she shouldn’t have been penalised for that brief giggle when Ms Tickle’s counsel asked her to look at a piece of satirical merchandise – a scented candle featuring a caricature of Tickle and a speech bubble reading: “So, I realised I was a woman because I hate the smell of balls.”

The candle – which was not produced, sold nor endorsed by Grover – mocked Tickle’s suggestion on the Insight program “that the ­realisation of being a woman was due to an aversion to the smell of men’s locker rooms”.

Grover’s legal team now argues that her “momentary, reflexive laugh” in response to political satire was protected by the implied freedom of political communication in the Constitution.

“If the freedom protects mockery, it protects response to mockery,” Grover’s lawyers argue.

Tickle’s comments about changing room smells had been satirised “as emblematic of the subjectivity and reversibility of gender identity claims advanced by males seeking access to female-only spaces”, they say.

But in a submission to the court, Tickle’s lawyers rejected Grover’s constitutional argument and last week wrote to her saying their client did not consent to the SBS program being admitted, as “this new evidence was not available to the trial judge”.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/trans-women-should-have-legal-protections-available-to-pregnant-women-court-told/news-story/ae8101d7ef2490572eb8dd2a406148be

https://www.youtube.com/@FederalCourtAus

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109482

File: 70bc52c74c1314c⋯.jpg (366.07 KB,1383x778,1383:778,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 0bc2c1a0a694e55⋯.jpg (1.51 MB,5304x3395,5304:3395,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23423528 (041115ZAUG25) Notable: AUKUS review focus on fixing subs ‘could favour Australia’ – The Pentagon’s review of the AUKUS submarine pact has expanded to include maintenance capacity, which former US Navy secretary Richard Spencer says could benefit Australia if it accelerates upgrades in Western Australia. Spencer, now Austal chairman, urged Canberra to “start walking and stop talking,” warning that delays risk leaving submarines idle. Upgrades at HMAS Stirling and Henderson shipyard are central, though funding remains modest. The review, led by US Under-Secretary of Defence Elbridge Colby, is due by November, with any final decision resting with President Donald Trump.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109299

>>109316

>>109318

>>109400

AUKUS review focus on fixing subs ‘could favour Australia’

Jessica Gardner - Aug 3, 2025

1/2

Washington | The US Navy’s expanded focus on submarine maintenance rates as part of the Pentagon’s review of the AUKUS pact could prove positive for the Albanese government if it acts faster to upgrade facilities in Western Australia, according to a former navy chief.

Richard Spencer, who was secretary of the US Navy during President Donald Trump’s first term, said a better maintenance network would help alleviate Pentagon concerns about building enough nuclear-powered submarines to meet domestic demand before delivering second-hand vessels to Australia by 2032.

Australia has committed to investing $US3 billion ($4.6 billion) in US shipbuilding facilities to help lift current production rates from below 1.5 to 2.3 new Virginia-class submarines a year. But Spencer, who is also chairman of Australian shipbuilder Austal, said if it acted faster to upgrade a defence precinct in Perth, Australia could lend a hand with maintenance too.

“The [Australian] Defence Ministry has to start walking and stop talking,” he said. “They have to start doing things. I know they’re writing cheques for AUKUS, but writing cheques does not move dirt, does not put dry docks in that can accommodate Virginias.”

The navy has broadened its evaluation of the AUKUS accord beyond whether shipbuilders can deliver vessels to Australia from 2032, according to two industry sources with knowledge of the review process. Expanding and upgrading maintenance rates could be an additional factor in ensuring the American fleet is at full strength in the event of a war with China, they said.

Spencer applauded the review’s expanded focus and said that to avoid having “a conga line” of inactive submarines waiting months at a time for maintenance, the navy had to urgently upgrade its facilities.

“We had one ship that was out 18 months when I was there, which is just absolutely unheard of,” he said.

“The navy has yet to get their head around that. So there’s infrastructure, there’s process, there’s people. It involves every single aspect of the enterprise, but it is critical.”

Two facilities about 30 kilometres south of Perth will play a critical role in Australia’s AUKUS commitments. An estimated $8 billion will be spent on upgrading the HMAS Stirling base, on Garden Island, as the home port for the rotational force of US and UK submarines from as early as 2027.

This initiative, known as SRF-West, is designed to help Australia gain the skills and infrastructure to operate its own nuclear–powered submarine fleet.

Meanwhile, the Henderson shipyard on the mainland will be a major shipbuilding location and will manage the docking and maintenance of submarines. However, the Australian government has so far budgeted just $127 million over three years from 2024 for planning and feasibility studies.

Former prime minister Scott Morrison has said Henderson could be used to repair US submarines, not just Australian vessels.

“There are many ways you can get more subs out at sea, and it’s not just about how quickly you build them; it’s also how you maintain them,” he told reporters last month during a visit to Washington. “Australia, through Henderson, has a real opportunity to add to that.”

The $368 billion defence co-operation agreement between the US, Australia and the United Kingdom, aimed at containing Chinese expansionism in the Indo-Pacific, came under a cloud in June when it was revealed US Under-Secretary of Defence for Policy Elbridge Colby – an AUKUS sceptic – had initiated a review.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109483

File: d85d69a9740fc72⋯.mp4 (13.45 MB,640x360,16:9,Clipboard.mp4)

File: 26c8b65ed4ec122⋯.jpg (619.06 KB,1241x1755,1241:1755,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 61c6d0e91d0722d⋯.jpg (507.8 KB,1241x1755,1241:1755,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 53b59b177b4779c⋯.jpg (661.29 KB,1241x1755,1241:1755,Clipboard.jpg)

File: df93c217bf20f8f⋯.jpg (366.68 KB,1241x1755,1241:1755,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23423545 (041130ZAUG25) Notable: Video: Chinese woman charged with reckless foreign interference over Canberra Buddhist association spying – A Chinese-born Australian permanent resident has been charged with reckless foreign interference, accused of gathering information on Canberra’s Guan Yin Citta Buddhist association on behalf of China’s Public Security Bureau. The Australian Federal Police allege she engaged in covert and deceptive conduct, with items including electronic devices seized during raids. Assistant Commissioner Stephen Nutt said the case, the first involving a community group, poses a threat to “democracy, social cohesion, and national sovereignty.” The offence carries a maximum 15-year prison term.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109325

>>109378

>>109469

>>109480

Chinese woman charged with reckless foreign interference over Canberra Buddhist association spying

It is the first time the Australian Federal Police has charged someone with foreign interference involving a community group.

Demi Huang - 4 August 2025

A Chinese woman has been charged after police alleged she was sent to gather information from an Australian association.

The woman, who is also an Australian permanent resident, was arrested on Saturday after the Australian Federal Police (AFP) executed search warrants at homes in Canberra.

The investigation began in March after a tip-off from Australian Security Intelligence Organisation (ASIO).

During the searches, several items - including electronic devices - were seized.

Police allege the woman was tasked by China’s Public Security Bureau to covertly gather information about the Canberra branch of Guan Yin Citta, a Buddhist association.

She has been charged with reckless foreign interference and faced the ACT Magistrates Court on Monday.

The offence carries a maximum penalty of 15 years’ imprisonment.

This is the first time the AFP has charged someone with foreign interference involving a community group, rather than the political or academic sectors.

Assistant Commissioner Stephen Nutt said the woman’s conduct was covert, deceptive, and undisclosed to those being monitored.

“There was covert and deceptive conduct about collecting information on the Buddhist group, acting in concert or collaboration with a person from China’s Public Security Bureau,” he told reporters on Monday.

While it remains unclear how the information was intended to be used, Nutt described the case as a threat to democracy, social cohesion, and national sovereignty.

“Foreign interference is a serious crime that undermines democracy and social cohesion,” he said.

“Foreign interference activity may be used to influence a political or government process, influence the exercise of an Australian democratic or political right, support the intelligence objectives of a foreign principle, or prejudice national security.”

Nutt said the investigation is ongoing and further charges have not been ruled out, with police planning more arrests.

This is the third time a foreign interference offence has been laid in Australia since the Commonwealth introduced new laws in 2018.

A Victorian man was charged in November 2020, while a NSW man was charged in April 2023.

“As with other like-minded countries, Australia is not immune to foreign interference, and we should not expect that this arrest will prevent further attempts to target our diaspora communities,” Nutt said.

“At a time of permanent regional contest, offenders will attempt to spy on individuals, groups and institutions in Australia.

“That’s why the AFP and our partners will continue to educate the community about what foreign interference is, how communities can protect themselves, and importantly, encourage the public to contact authorities if they believe they are being targeted by those working for foreign entities.

ASIO Director-General Mike Burgess warned those targeting diaspora communities not to underestimate Australia’s national security agencies.

“Anyone who thinks it is acceptable to monitor, intimidate and potentially repatriate members of our diaspora communities should never underestimate our capabilities and resolve,” he said.

A factsheet on foreign interference is available in more than 40 languages on the AFP website.

It explains what foreign interference is, how it manifests, and what individuals can do if they believe they are being threatened or intimidated by foreign governments.

Members of the public who feel threatened should contact their local police on 131 444, or in an emergency or life-threatening situation, call triple-0 immediately.

Individuals or community groups who feel they are the target of foreign interference are encouraged to contact the National Security Hotline on 1800 123 400.

https://7news.com.au/news/chinese-woman-charged-with-reckless-foreign-interference-over-canberra-buddhist-association-spying-c-19575850

https://www.afp.gov.au/news-centre/media-release/chinese-national-charged-foreign-interference-offence-canberra

https://www.afp.gov.au/crimes/espionage-and-foreign-interference

https://www.afp.gov.au/sites/default/files/PDF/Factsheet-ForeignInterferenceintheCommunity.pdf

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109484

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23428058 (051026ZAUG25) Notable: PM speaks with Palestinian Authority amid mounting pressure to recognise statehood – Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has spoken with Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas, pledging support for aid access, a ceasefire, hostage releases and a two-state solution, while agreeing to meet him at the UN General Assembly in September. Australia committed $20m in new Gaza aid as pressure grows for recognition of Palestinian statehood, with Penny Wong suggesting coordination with allies ahead of the UN. Albanese also seeks a call with Benjamin Netanyahu, while UN figures show 1300 Palestinians have died trying to access food since late May.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109251

>>109475

>>109478

>>109479

PM speaks with Palestinian Authority amid mounting pressure to recognise statehood

Yashee Sharma - Aug 5, 2025

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has had a rare phone call with Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas overnight, promising to meet with him on the sidelines of a crucial global leaders meeting next month.

According to a readout of the call, Albanese discussed the immediate entry of aid into Gaza, a permanent ceasefire, the release of all hostages and a two-state solution.

Abbas thanked Albanese for his support, just hours after Australia committed another $20 million of humanitarian aid to Gaza.

The two leaders discussed "deepening cooperation" and have agreed to meet on the sidelines of the United Nations General Assembly in New York in September.

The United Kingdom, Canada and France have set the United Nations meeting as their stage to recognise Palestinian statehood if governance reforms are agreed upon.

Albanese is under pressure to confirm whether he will use the international momentum to recognise Palestinian statehood, with his government reiterating it is a matter of "when, not if".

When asked about Australia's unclear timeframe for recognition, Foreign Minister Penny Wong suggested the government was working behind the scenes towards the upcoming UN meeting.

"September, there will be a high-level leaders meeting at the UN. Between now and then, we will be working with other countries and coordinating with them," she told Today.

Albanese has stressed that Hamas could have no role in a future Palestinian state.

Hamas has said it would not disarm until the establishment of an "independent, full sovereign Palestinian state".

Albanese is also seeking a phone call with his Israeli counterpart, Benjamin Netanyahu.

Wong confirmed the talk has not happened yet.

"I'm sure if he does, the prime minister will put the view that he has put publicly, and the view of so many Australians, that Australia wants to see a ceasefire, Australia wants to see the hostages released... Australia wants aid to flow," she told Today.

Netanyahu is poised to urge a meeting of the national security cabinet to support the full "conquest" of Gaza, according to Israeli media reports.

Meanwhile, the World Health Organisation has said the number of starvation-related deaths spiked and malnutrition rates reached "alarming levels" in Gaza last month.

According to the UN, at least 1300 Palestinians have been killed while trying to reach food since May 27.

An estimated 100,000 to 300,000 Australians marched across the Sydney Harbour Bridge on Sunday to protest the worsening humanitarian crisis in Gaza.

The demonstration's organisers, Palestine Action Group, said the march called for an end to the war on Gaza and demanded the Australian government sanction Israel.

"We've sent an enormous message to the world," the group said.

https://www.9news.com.au/national/anthony-albanese-speaks-with-palestinian-authority-president-mahmoud-abbas/d9c0f43c-61cc-4c5f-9dec-e700986ae78a

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q9QFOBLVDlI

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109485

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23428083 (051040ZAUG25) Notable: Video: Japan beats Germany to build Australia’s new frigate fleet – Japan’s Mitsubishi Heavy Industries has been selected to build Australia’s new 11-ship frigate fleet, with Defence Minister Richard Marles calling the upgraded Mogami “absolutely the best ship” over Germany’s MEKO-A200. The first three vessels, costing $10bn with infrastructure upgrades, will be built in Japan by 2034, with the remaining eight intended for Perth’s Henderson shipyard. The frigates will feature 32 vertical launch cells, stealth design and long-range missile capability. The deal, Japan’s largest defence export since WWII, symbolises deepening bilateral ties but poses export and sustainment risks.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109299

>>109400

Japan beats Germany to build Australia’s new frigate fleet

BEN PACKHAM - 5 August 2025

1/2

The Albanese government is leaving open the option of building more general purpose frigates offshore after selecting Japan’s Mitsubishi Heavy Industries to deliver the new frontline warships in a decision that will shape the navy for a generation.

MHI’s upgraded Mogami was named the winner of the frigate contest on Tuesday, beating its German rival, the MEKO-A200, offered by Thyssen­Krupp Marine Systems.

Defence Minister Richard Marles said the Japanese vessel was “absolutely the best ship” in the race, with a contract to be signed by early next year for an 11-vessel fleet that could ultimately cost $30bn or more.

The government has budgeted $10bn for the first three ships, together with infrastructure upgrades at Henderson and “long lead items” that need to be ordered well in advance.

But he refused to say what the per-ship cost of the program would be, arguing it would undermine the government’s bargaining position as it negotiated a final contract price with MHI.

MHI has pledged to deliver the first ship by 2029 and a third by 2034 from its Japanese production line, with a further eight due to be built at Perth’s Henderson shipbuilding precinct.

However, Defence Industry Minister Pat Conroy said there was no guarantee that Henderson or the government’s new sovereign shipbuilder, Austal, would be ready to commence domestic production in time for ships four to six. “It’s up to Australian industry to prove that they can do this. We’re not giving a blank cheque, but I’m confident that they’ll rise to the challenge,” he said.

The Henderson yards need major upgrades to relocate non-defence tenants and undertake maintenance on visiting US and British nuclear submarines, while Austal has 26 landing craft to build for the army before it can focus on the frigates. West Australian Premier Roger Cook said it was “absolutely imperative … that those ships are built in Western Australia”.

“We’ll do what needs to be done,” he said. “That will happen because it’s not just about building the ships, it’s about building them in Australia and building … our sovereign defence capacity.”

Cabinet’s national security committee selected the Japanese ship at a meeting on Monday evening, with the bidders informed of the decision soon after.

The government said the Japanese ship was recommended by Defence on the key criteria of cost, capability and build schedule. “The Mogami-class frigate is the best frigate for Australia,” Mr Marles said.

“It is a next-generation vessel. It is stealthy. It has 32 vertical launch cells capable of launching long-range missiles. It has a ­highly capable radar, highly capable sonar. In that sense, it is generally a general-purpose frigate capable of engaging in air warfare and undersea warfare.”

The MEKO-A200 had only 16 vertical launch cells and, unlike the Mogami, could not be upgraded to fire long-range Tomahawk missiles, or advanced SM-2 and SM-6 air defence missiles, the government said.

Mr Marles said the choice also had strategic benefits. “There’s no other country in the world that is quite as aligned with Australia as Japan,” he said.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109486

File: 506713c639f7ad8⋯.jpg (223.94 KB,1280x720,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: ace978ac25f93be⋯.jpg (331.52 KB,1361x1814,1361:1814,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23428097 (051050ZAUG25) Notable: Chinese woman accused of spying on Canberra Buddhist group on Beijing’s orders – A Chinese-born Australian permanent resident has been charged with reckless foreign interference after allegedly being directed by China’s Public Security Bureau to spy on the Guan Yin Citta Buddhist association in Canberra, which Beijing considers an “evil cult.” The woman, whose identity is suppressed, faced court on Monday after being arrested in AFP Operation Autumn Shield. Assistant Commissioner Stephen Nutt said further arrests are expected. It is the third charge under Australia’s 2018 foreign interference laws, with ASIO’s Mike Burgess calling the alleged conduct “an appalling assault on Australian values.”

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109325

>>109378

>>109469

>>109483

Chinese woman accused of spying on Canberra Buddhist group on Beijing’s orders

BEN PACKHAM and NOAH YIM - 5 August 2025

1/2

A Chinese woman was allegedly directed by Beijing’s security services to covertly collect information on a Canberra Buddhist group considered by the Chinese Communist Party to be part of an “evil cult”.

The woman, a permanent Australian resident who cannot be identified for legal reasons, faced Canberra Magistrates Court on Monday on one count of reckless foreign interference.

She is alleged to have been instructed by China’s Public Security Bureau to “covertly gather information” on Canberra’s Guan Yin Citta Buddhist association, based near the Australian National University.

Australian Federal Police Assistant Commissioner Stephen Nutt said more arrests were expected in relation to the case, after electronic devices were seized in search warrants on multiple Canberra addresses.

Guan Yin Citta has clandestine centres in mainland China, as well as associations in the US, Singapore, Malaysia and Taiwan.

China’s security services have reportedly sought to eradicate the movement, which was founded by Shanghai-born Sydney man Lu Junhong, who died in 2021 aged 62.

The woman, whose identity was suppressed by the court, was arrested on Saturday. If found guilty, she faces a maximum 15 years’ jail.

She was arrested as part of Operation Autumn Shield, launched in March after information from ASIO.

Guan Yi Citta’s Canberra headquarters is on the fourth floor of a worn-down office building opposite the Australian National University. A woman who answered the door at the association on Monday said she did not know anything about the arrest.

It is the third time a charge has been laid under the commonwealth’s 2018 foreign interference laws.

The first involves Vietnamese-Chinese community leader Di Sanh Duong, accused of courting former multicultural affairs minister Alan Tudge on behalf of the Chinese Communist Party.

The second involves Australian businessman Alexander Csergo, accused of compiling reports for China on Australian defence, economic and national security arrangements.

Mr Nutt said that in the latest case, police were focusing on the unlawful targeting of Australian community members.

“Foreign interference is a serious crime that undermines democracy and social cohesion. It is a crime carried out on behalf of a foreign principal that involves covert and deceptive conduct or threats of serious harm or menacing demands,” he said.

“Foreign interference activity may be used to influence a political or government process, influence the exercise of an Australian democratic or political right, support the intelligence objectives of a foreign principal or prejudice national security.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109487

File: b7fbd2fc8b479f5⋯.jpg (1.81 MB,5000x3750,4:3,Clipboard.jpg)

File: e52afc47c9e2505⋯.jpg (1.64 MB,3500x2800,5:4,Clipboard.jpg)

File: ebb489c1e6a5b8e⋯.jpg (2.33 MB,4124x2319,4124:2319,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23428116 (051107ZAUG25) Notable: China, US could be excluded from Pacific Islands Forum amid pressure over Taiwan – Solomon Islands Prime Minister Jeremiah Manele is expected to propose restricting next month’s Pacific Islands Forum (PIF) leaders meeting in Honiara to members only, excluding Taiwan, China, the US and other partners. The move, presented as procedural, is seen as an attempt to defuse Beijing’s pressure to block Taiwan while avoiding a split among Pacific allies. Analysts said the plan would “de-escalate a geopolitically charged situation” but risk angering major partners. Australia and New Zealand are urging Solomon Islands not to exclude Taiwan.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>73475 (pb)

>>73610 (pb)

>>>/qresearch/23239588 (pb)

China, US could be excluded from Pacific Islands Forum amid pressure over Taiwan

abc.net.au - 4 August 2025

Solomon Islands could try to defuse a potentially explosive stoush over Taiwan's participation in a key regional meeting next month by restricting the gathering to Pacific Islands Forum (PIF) members — effectively excluding China, the US and a host of other countries as well.

Solomon Islands Prime Minister Jeremiah Manele is under increasing pressure over whether his country will allow Taiwan's representatives to attend the Pacific Islands Forum leaders meeting in Honiara this September.

Taiwan has long attended the meeting as a "development partner" and has used that opportunity to meet with Pacific "allies" that extend its diplomatic recognition — although that band has now dwindled to just three nations.

But Beijing remains intent on doing everything it can to isolate Taiwan diplomatically, and has been pressing Solomon Islands to break with tradition and exclude Taiwan entirely, stirring anger among Taipei's remaining allies, and stoking frustration in Canberra and Wellington.

China responded furiously at last year's PIF leaders meeting in Tonga when Pacific leaders reaffirmed the status quo, and earlier this year, Solomon Islands refused to issue visas to Taiwanese officials who wanted to enter Honiara to help prepare for their delegation.

Now the ABC has been told Mr Manele is likely to propose to fellow Pacific leaders that the annual dialogue with PIF partners be deferred entirely, until after a broader review of regional diplomatic architecture is complete.

That review, which includes a proposal to establish a new "tiered" system for PIF dialogue partners, was meant to be finished in time for the leaders' meeting in September, but has been hit with delays.

By deferring the dialogue, Solomon Islands will effectively block not just China and Taiwan from sending delegations to Honiara, but a host of other countries as well, including from Asia, Europe and the Middle East.

While Mr Manele is likely to present the proposal as procedural, an Australian government source said it was "obvious" that Solomon Islands was also "looking for a solution to the Taiwan problem", which both Beijing and Taiwan's Pacific allies could live with.

Palau's President Surangel Whipps Jr has already warned that singling out and excluding Taiwan could risk a reprise of the "PIF split" that rocked the forum a few years ago.

Tuvalu's Climate Change Minister Maina Talia also took aim at China last week, saying Pacific nations that chose to recognise Taiwan also had the right to meet with their key partner at the leaders' meeting.

Anna Powles from Massey University said the compromise being put forward by Mr Manele would "de-escalate a geopolitically charged situation" but was also "evidence that geopolitics has coopted the Forum Leaders Meeting."

"If Beijing was not placing pressure on Solomon Islands, Prime Minister Manele would presumably be able to uphold the 1992 Honiara Communique [which affirms that Taiwan should be able to meet its allies on the margins of the PIF leaders meeting]," Dr Powles said.

One Pacific official told the ABC that while no final decision had been made — and that the PIF Secretariat would have to endorse the proposal — Mr Manele's compromise might be the "only solution" if Solomon Islands was determined not to let Taiwan's representatives into the country.

They also said Mr Manele and the PIF Secretariat would be able to point to a precedent: Fiji also excluded dialogue partners when they hosted the leaders meeting in 2022, saying Pacific nations needed to focus on healing rifts from the PIF split.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109488

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23428124 (051117ZAUG25) Notable: Video: Allies remember Pacific War 80 years on - With the enormous Ohio-class guided missile submarine in Brisbane, Sky News’ Investigations Reporter Jonathan Lea has taken a deeper look at the reason for its visit. War games brought it down under - now allies are beginning to mark the 80th anniversary of Victory in the Pacific. All as the government awaits news confirming Washington will still sell Australia at least three Virginia-class attack submarines needed for the navy. - Sky News Australia

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109299

>>109224

>>109320

Allies remember Pacific War 80 years on

Sky News Australia

Aug 4, 2025

With the enormous Ohio-class guided missile submarine in Brisbane, Sky News’ Investigations Reporter Jonathan Lea has taken a deeper look at the reason for its visit.

War games brought it down under – now allies are beginning to mark the 80th anniversary of Victory in the Pacific.

All as the government awaits news confirming Washington will still sell Australia at least three Virginia-class attack submarines needed for the navy.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BLKC3E3vru0

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109489

File: ab2d42d4eb254df⋯.jpg (501.42 KB,2048x1536,4:3,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23428135 (051126ZAUG25) Notable: Brigadier Ben McLennan hails Talisman Sabre a huge success for Townsville and ADF – Brigadier Ben McLennan declared Talisman Sabre 2025 “exceeded expectations,” praising Townsville’s role and the Australian Defence Force’s ability to coordinate with 19 partner nations. The exercise showcased new platforms, including the M182 Abrams tank deployed for the first time. McLennan described it as “a bonanza for us” and thanked the region for its support. Exercise director Brigadier Damian Hill highlighted expanded geography, record participation, and activities in Papua New Guinea coinciding with its 50th independence anniversary. The exercise formally closes on August 4.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109224

>>109320

>>109432

>>109424

Brigadier Ben McLennan hails Talisman Sabre a huge success for Townsville and ADF

Emily Devon - August 2, 2025

The world’s largest defence exercise that took place right here in North Queensland is over and it has been hailed a massive success.

Brigadier Ben McLennan said Talisman Sabre had “exceeded expectations” from all over.

“It exceeded the arms, the ADFs and our partners and allies in what we delivered, it’s the world’s largest exercise of its type without a doubt and we’re very proud that team Australia and army and the ADF are the ones who design and conduct it with our allies,” he said.

“It allows us to practice how we fight as an arm of formation, we only became an arm of formation in the last six months, in January this year.”

The Open Day held at Riverway also displayed new platforms that Brigadier McLennan said were used in the practice.

“I think we passed the exam at least, but it was great to be able to sit the exam through this activity,” he said.

He said third brigade’s amphibious department travelled up and down the east coast from the top of Hinchinbrook Shire to Rockhampton and Livingstone Shire.

Its armoured department was largely based in Charters Towers and Townsville.

“For us the key capability that we were able to roll out was the M182 Abrams tank, the best tank in the world,” he said.

“We’ve got 36 of them and were able to deploy them for the first time and it delivered in spades.

“This exercise was a bonanza for us, it was exciting for us.”

While the most significant exercise of the year is over, the Brigadier said the engineers were excited to have access to new platforms in which he referred to as “behemoth” sized.

“I’ve been waiting my whole career for these things to arrive,” he said.

“People were writing articles about these in the 90s. There’s no one that packs a punch greater than us.”

Brigadier McLennan said he wanted to thank the region for their support.

“We don’t take it for granted, we’re so appreciative.”

Brigadier and Talisman Sabre Exercise Director Damian Hill said everyone had almost returned home safely from the exercise, and said it had been “truly impressive to see”.

“I think it was the first time in many years we had an Australian Combat Division in the field,” he said.

He said it had spread between here in Townsville, NT and Central Queensland.

“I was asked to do three things – to expand geography, expand the number of countries, so there were 19 countries, and the last thing, to look at an activity overseas for Papua New Guinea.

“We asked if they were willing to host an activity and they were unbelievably accommodating, it just happened to coincide with the 50th anniversary of Independence for Papua New Guinea which I think is fantastic.”

He said Talisman Sabre was set to close properly on August 4.

https://www.townsvillebulletin.com.au/news/brigadier-ben-mclennan-hails-talisman-sabre-a-huge-success-for-townsville-and-adf/news-story/68385e5fd8f176a68c64c43e40ab2200

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109490

File: 5912e3b9cb872a3⋯.jpg (142.91 KB,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 298a6d414d789f0⋯.jpg (456.28 KB,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 2d2ecb9429be3d2⋯.jpg (5.4 MB,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23428147 (051133ZAUG25) Notable: Historic Talisman Sabre Exercise nears end with Personnel Recovery DrillTalisman Sabre 2025 concludes on August 4 with its first-ever overseas component, featuring complex personnel recovery drills in Papua New Guinea. Forces from the PNG Defence Force, Australian Defence Force and US Armed Forces simulated a crashed aircraft response, deploying joint air, sea and land assets including a PNG Guardian-class Patrol Boat, a C27-J Spartan and the USS Miguel Keith. Exercise Director Brigadier Damian Hill said the trilateral drills strengthened regional ties, coinciding with PNG’s 50th independence anniversary and underscoring its growing defence interoperability.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109224

>>109320

>>109432

>>109424

Historic Talisman Sabre Exercise nears end with Personnel Recovery Drill

POSTCOURIERONLINE - AUGUST 2, 2025

In a historic first for the major military training event, Exercise Talisman Sabre 2025 is wrapping up with complex training scenarios being conducted in Wewak and Lae, Papua New Guinea.

The exercise, which concludes on August 4, 2025, marks the first time components of the multinational exercise have been held outside of Australia.

The final activities include a joint personnel recovery exercise, where the Papua New Guinea Defence Force (PNGDF), Australian Defence Force (ADF), and US Armed Forces are simulating a response to a crashed aircraft. The training involves a Multi-National Tactical Operations Centre deploying a combined recovery team to the crash site to recover personnel.

As the scenario progresses, the mission will integrate a PNG Guardian-class Patrol Boat, a PNG Air Transport Wing PAC750 aircraft, an Australian C27-J Spartan, and the USS Miguel Keith with its embarked helicopters and mission support craft. This growing complexity highlights the strong integration and interoperability between the allied forces.

Exercise Talisman Sabre 2025 Director Brigadier Damian Hill emphasised the importance of the trilateral partnership. “To work together means to work as one combined force. We become stronger together and I am confident that this exercise has forged a stronger relationship between the three countries, including the Australian Defence Force, Papua New Guinea Defence Force and the United States Armed Forces,” he said.

He added, “This activity is designed to provide participants insight into a real-life scenario while working together to recover personnel.”

The complex training scenarios demonstrate the PNGDF’s growing capabilities and its increasing interoperability with Pacific partners, which is particularly significant as Papua New Guinea celebrates its 50th anniversary of independence.

Exercise Talisman Sabre 2025 will officially conclude with a closing ceremony in Lae on August 4.

https://www.postcourier.com.pg/historic-talisman-sabre-exercise-nears-end-with-personnel-recovery-drill/

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109491

File: 7185b262361417d⋯.jpg (141.46 KB,800x600,4:3,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 3567fd13a7e5291⋯.jpg (201.47 KB,1080x720,3:2,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 8c674eef28ebc18⋯.jpg (289.47 KB,1080x720,3:2,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23428160 (051139ZAUG25) Notable: Talisman Sabre ends in PNG with renewed calls for stronger defence ties – The 11th Talisman Sabre military exercise has concluded with Australia, the United States and Papua New Guinea emphasising unity in a tense Indo-Pacific. For the first time, drills were staged in Lae and Wewak, where joint forces carried out a complex search and rescue exercise. Vice Admiral Justin Jones said the exercise proved allies could “train together, plan together, and be ready” to defend shared security. With 19 nations participating and PNG marking its 50th Independence, calls have grown for deeper defence cooperation and future joint activities.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109224

>>109320

>>109432

>>109424

Talisman Sabre ends in PNG with renewed calls for stronger defence ties

MARTHA LOUIS - AUGUST 4, 2025

The 11th Talisman Sabre military exercise wrapped up this week with a clear message: Australia, the United States, and Papua New Guinea are standing firmer together in an increasingly tense region.

This year marked the first time part of the exercise took place outside Australia. Lae and Wewak played host to key training activities, including a complex search and rescue drill involving troops from the three nations.

Vice Admiral Justin Jones, Chief of Joint Operations for the Australian Defence Force, said the past three weeks have highlighted the strength of working with trusted allies.

“Our greatest strength lies in our allies, partners, and like-minded friends,” he said. “Talisman Sabre proves we can train together, plan together, and be ready, if needed, to defend our shared security.”

Nineteen nations were involved, with Vietnam and Malaysia observing for the first time. The exercise, held across Australia and PNG, focused on preparing for high-end warfare, humanitarian work, and disaster response.

As the Indo-Pacific faces growing geopolitical pressure, questions remain about how Australia, the US, and PNG will deepen their cooperation. Local communities in Lae and Wewak have welcomed the visibility, but some have asked how they will benefit from future military visits.

Vice Admiral Jones said lessons learned from this year’s exercise will guide planning for the next round in 2025.

And with PNG’s 50th Independence celebrations coming up, the Australian Defence Force is also preparing to contribute, offering aircraft, naval vessels, and even an army band.

“It’s an honour to celebrate this milestone alongside the people of PNG,” Jones said.

For now, the troops return home, but plans for closer defence ties in the region are clearly underway.

https://www.postcourier.com.pg/talisman-sabre-ends-in-png-with-renewed-calls-for-stronger-defence-ties/

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109492

File: ccc95a32473f81e⋯.jpg (909.32 KB,750x1955,150:391,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 377e908a02a80bb⋯.jpg (536.6 KB,1200x800,3:2,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 373960c1f461526⋯.jpg (577.64 KB,1200x800,3:2,Clipboard.jpg)

File: ee5fa043a01c3ed⋯.jpg (499.96 KB,1200x800,3:2,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23428182 (051149ZAUG25) Notable: Talisman Sabre Tweets: (Video) The closing ceremony of Talisman Sabre 2025 was held in Lae, Papua New Guinea, today. The celebrations included a quarter guard by the PNGDF, and a fly-over by a PAC-750. Officials from PNG, Australia and the United States all spoke of the significance of PNG hosting Talisman Sabre activities this year - the first time a component of the exercise has been conducted outside of Australia – and the close defence ties between the three nations. This ceremony marks the conclusion of Talisman Sabre 2025.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109224

>>109320

>>109432

>>109424

Talisman Sabre Tweets

1/2

The closing ceremony of Talisman Sabre 2025 was held in Lae, Papua New Guinea, today.

The celebrations included a quarter guard by the PNGDF, and a fly-over by a PAC-750.

https://x.com/TalismanSabre/status/1952297719956898098

Officials from PNG, Australia and the United States all spoke of the significance of PNG hosting Talisman Sabre activities this year – the first time a component of the exercise has been conducted outside of Australia – and the close defence ties between the three nations.

https://x.com/TalismanSabre/status/1952297728496558542

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109493

File: b9bcd30f237b7e3⋯.jpg (552.72 KB,1200x800,3:2,Clipboard.jpg)

File: f0a93c533526fee⋯.jpg (358.85 KB,1200x800,3:2,Clipboard.jpg)

File: b2d00f3134e5101⋯.jpg (744.32 KB,1200x800,3:2,Clipboard.jpg)

File: bec78ec31da176b⋯.jpg (576.85 KB,1200x800,3:2,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23428186 (051151ZAUG25) Notable: Talisman Sabre Tweets: (Video) The closing ceremony of Talisman Sabre 2025 was held in Lae, Papua New Guinea, today. The celebrations included a quarter guard by the PNGDF, and a fly-over by a PAC-750. Officials from PNG, Australia and the United States all spoke of the significance of PNG hosting Talisman Sabre activities this year - the first time a component of the exercise has been conducted outside of Australia – and the close defence ties between the three nations. This ceremony marks the conclusion of Talisman Sabre 2025.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109492

2/2

This ceremony marks the conclusion of Talisman Sabre 2025.

📷 CPL Cameron Pegg

https://x.com/TalismanSabre/status/1952297737006760120

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109494

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23428192 (051157ZAUG25) Notable: Video: Exercise Talisman Sabre 2025 - From fighter jets and surveillance aircraft to heavy lifters and logistics teams, Air Force brought the full force of its capability to Exercise Talisman Sabre 2025. More than 5,500 flight hours - 2,000 sorties - Operations across five states and Papua New Guinea. Air Force worked side by side with 18 partner nations to train for high-end scenarios and test what it takes to operate as part of a joint and combined force. It takes an entire team - on the ground and in the air - to deliver Air Power. Talisman Sabre may be over for another year, however you’ll still see our people and equipment in the coming weeks in the sky and on the road as we make the trip home. - Royal Australian Air Force

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109224

>>109320

>>109432

>>109424

Exercise Talisman Sabre 2025

Royal Australian Air Force

Jul 29, 2025

From fighter jets and surveillance aircraft to heavy lifters and logistics teams, Air Force brought the full force of its capability to Exercise Talisman Sabre 2025.

✈ More than 5,500 flight hours

🎯 2,000 sorties

🌏 Operations across five states and Papua New Guinea

Air Force worked side by side with 18 partner nations to train for high-end scenarios and test what it takes to operate as part of a joint and combined force.

It takes an entire team - on the ground and in the air - to deliver Air Power.

Talisman Sabre may be over for another year, however you’ll still see our people and equipment in the coming weeks in the sky and on the road as we make the trip home.

🎥 | SGT Kieren Whiteley

#TalismanSabre2025 #StrongerTogether #FriendsPartnersAllies

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qwz6Mt0lfF4

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109495

File: a168f16a955217f⋯.jpg (263.59 KB,750x806,375:403,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 2ad7537a62573a3⋯.mp4 (15.47 MB,640x360,16:9,Clipboard.mp4)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23428208 (051210ZAUG25) Notable: Talisman Sabre -Magic Sword- https://qalerts.pub/?q=Operation+Specialists - https://qalerts.pub/?q=magic''''

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109224

>>109320

>>109432

>>109424

Talisman Sabre Tweet

This year, Talisman Sabre hit some new milestones.

Hear from Vice Admiral Justin Jones, Australian Defence Chief of Joint Operations on the successes of Talisman Sabre 25 🏆

#TS25 #TalismanSabre25 #StrongerTogether #OurPeople

https://x.com/TalismanSabre/status/1952172758235770926

>Talisman Sabre

MAGIC SWORD

https://qalerts.pub/?q=Operation+Specialists

https://qalerts.pub/?q=magic

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109496

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23432165 (060941ZAUG25) Notable: Jeremy Rockliff reappointed as Tasmanian premier as Labor signals another no-confidence motion — Jeremy Rockliff has been recommissioned as Tasmania’s premier after the governor accepted his request to continue leading a minority Liberal government. Rockliff pledged to govern for a full four-year term, despite Labor leader Dean Winter announcing a no-confidence motion would be tabled when parliament returns on August 19. The governor cited the “convention of incumbency,” allowing Rockliff to test his support in parliament. The Liberals hold 14 seats, Labor 10, the Greens five, one Shooters, Fishers and Farmers MP, and five independents., MISSING MEDIA/FILES: The_Liberal_leader_Jeremy_Rockliff_has_been_reappointed_as_premier_of_Tasmania_by_the_governor_Barbara_Baker.jpg

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109361

>>109362

>>109363

>>109380

Jeremy Rockliff reappointed as Tasmanian premier as Labor signals another no-confidence motion

Liberal insists he will govern for four years but authority to be tested within weeks when parliament returns

Luca Ittimani - 6 Aug 2025

Tasmania’s Liberal government has been recommissioned after weeks of political limbo after a snap election that failed to deliver either major party a majority.

The premier, Jeremy Rockliff, met with the governor, Barbara Baker, on Wednesday at Government House to formally ask for his minority government to remain.

Baker accepted the request after Rockliff told her he expected to gain the confidence of the lower house, the governor said.

Just hours after the premier was reappointed, the state’s Labor leader, Dean Winter, said a motion of no confidence would be tabled on the first day of the new parliament, either by Labor or a crossbencher.

“It is clear we need a parliament that will work together and Tasmania Labor stands ready to work with the crossbench to deliver Tasmanians a stable parliament and a stable government that can last four years,” Winter said.

“Tasmanians can be assured that any motion we move will not result in another election, it will result in either a Liberal government or a Labor government.”

Rockliff said on Wednesday he would serve as premier for a full four-year term.

“Through sensible communication, everyone working together, pragmatism, working together on policies, working together in the best interests of Tasmanians, this is a government and a parliament that will last the full term,” he told reporters after the governor confirmed his appointment.

“What we want to do, by evidenced of today, is get on with the job,”

He said he had taken “learnings” from the previous parliament which was cut short by a vote of no confidence.

“We want to build on the progress that was made in terms of how parliament works for the betterment of all members of parliament and, of course, that means the betterment of all Tasmanians. And move forward.”

In a statement, the governor explained why she appointed Rockliff despite his inability to demonstrate a majority backing in parliament.

“In a hung parliament, where no one clearly holds the confidence of the majority of the House of Assembly, the incumbent has the right to remain in office in order to test the numbers in the House of Assembly and for parliament to have the final say in who should be premier,” Baker said.

“I consider the convention of incumbency applies in the current circumstances.

“I shall reappoint the premier.

“It is better for confidence to be determined inside and not outside the parliament.”

Rockliff and his cabinet are set to be sworn in next week, before state parliament returns in a fortnight on 19 August.

The governor said the detailed reasons for her decision would be published on her website later on Wednesday.

On Tuesday, Rockliff said he had not secured supply and confidence agreements with key crossbenchers but thought it was “not necessary” in this instance.

The final makeup of Tasmania’s parliament is 14 Liberals, 10 Labor, five Greens, one Shooters, Fishers and Farmers MP and five independents.

The 19 July election was triggered after Rockliff lost a no-confidence motion, prompting the state’s second election in 16 months.

A key sticking point in forming government is the major parties’ backing of a new $1bn stadium in Hobart, which the Greens and some independents oppose.

https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2025/aug/06/jeremy-rockliff-premier-tasmania

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109497

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23432173 (060947ZAUG25) Notable: Trump and Murdoch agree to pause in battle over Epstein article — Donald Trump and Rupert Murdoch have agreed to delay Murdoch’s deposition in the US president’s $15bn libel suit against The Wall Street Journal over a story linking him to Jeffrey Epstein. Court filings show the pause will remain until the Journal’s motion to dismiss is heard. Murdoch, 94, had faced pressure for an expedited appearance due to age and health but will only testify if dismissal fails. Trump alleges the Journal defamed him by publishing a 2003 “fake” letter and drawing, while News Corp vows to defend its reporting., MISSING MEDIA/FILES: Donald_Trump_has_filed_legal_action_against_Rupert_Murdoch_and_News_Corporation_over_a_story_published_in_The_Wall_Street_Journal.jpg, Rupert_Murdoch_and_Donald_Trump_embrace_at_a_function_in_2017.jpg

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109289

>>109355

>>109358

>>109437

Trump and Murdoch agree to pause in battle over Epstein article

Calum Jaspan - August 5, 2025

Rupert Murdoch and Donald Trump have agreed to pause the media mogul’s deposition in a libel lawsuit brought by the US president last month over a story published by The Wall Street Journal detailing Trump’s dealings with Jeffrey Epstein.

Court filings released on Tuesday said the two parties had reached an agreement to hold off on Murdoch’s court appearance until after The Wall Street Journal’s motion to dismiss the case had been heard.

Trump had initially sought Murdoch’s deposition to be expedited, citing the 94-year-old’s age and health, which some media outlets have labelled a stunt.

The parties had also agreed not to engage in discovery in the meantime, filings released by the Florida Court said.

The agreement was reached on Monday evening, according to US media outlet Politico. The likely outcome is that Murdoch, also facing a resumption of his own family legal battle in Nevada this year, will not appear in court for at least several months, and would only need to if the Journal’s motion to dismiss the case failed.

The filing also said Murdoch would appear in a mutually agreed location, in person, within 30 days, should the motion fail, and that he had agreed to provide “regularly scheduled updates to the Plaintiff [Trump] regarding his health”, including a mechanism for him to alert the president if there was a material change in his health.

Trump brought the $US10 billion ($15 billion) suit last month after The Wall Street Journal published a story reporting that he had signed a “bawdy” letter to Epstein, the disgraced Wall Street financier, for his 50th birthday, which included a drawing of a naked woman with his signature attached.

The president named Murdoch, News Corp chief executive Robert Thomson and the two reporters responsible for the article as defendants. The company intends to defend the reporting.

Trump has sued several other major media companies, including Disney-owned television network ABC and Paramount-owned CBS, ultimately settling both for a fraction of the costs he initially sought.

Trump has faced mounting pressure over his administration’s handling of the Epstein scandal and his links to the convicted paedophile, who died while in custody in 2019.

His initial response to the Journal story was that the drawing and letter was “fake”, claiming the publication of the alleged 2003 letter amounted to slander and violated libel laws.

The president and his team were reported to have gone to great lengths to kill the story, which the newspaper ultimately printed, and has stood by since its publication, later also reporting that Trump’s name appeared in the Epstein files.

Thomson will face investors on Wednesday morning, Australian time, as the company delivers its full-year financial results. News Corp’s other east coast newspaper, the New York Post, has announced its intentions to launch a Los Angeles based right-wing tabloid on Tuesday, The California Post.

https://www.theage.com.au/business/companies/trump-and-murdoch-agree-to-pause-in-battle-over-epstein-article-20250805-p5mklj.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109498

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23432218 (061013ZAUG25) Notable: ‘Let us see the audits’: Kmart faces legal battle over alleged links to Uyghur forced labour — Kmart is facing a Federal Court challenge from the Australian Uyghur Tangritagh Women’s Association, which is demanding disclosure of audits and documents on two Chinese textile factories linked to Uyghur forced labour. The group, represented by Maurice Blackburn and the Human Rights Law Centre, argues Kmart may have misled consumers by making unsubstantiated ethical sourcing claims. Kmart insists it has provided extensive details and monitors suppliers, but critics say it has withheld audit evidence. The case is the first of its kind in Australia., MISSING MEDIA/FILES: Australian_Uyghurs_take_Kmart_to_court.mp4, Kmart_has_been_hit_with_a_legal_bid_to_provide_documents_on_how_it_has_dealt_with_two_suppliers_and_their_alleged_links_to_forced_labour_in_the_Uyghur_region.jpg

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109325

>>109337

‘Let us see the audits’: Kmart faces legal battle over alleged links to Uyghur forced labour

Jessica Yun - August 5, 2025

1/2

Kmart has defended its ethical sourcing practices after being served with a court challenge to provide documents on how it has dealt with two clothing factories that have been linked to forced labour in Xinjiang, an autonomous territory in north-western China.

The Australian Uyghur Tangritagh Women’s Association (AUTWA) filed a Federal Court application on Monday seeking documentation from Kmart about what it knew of two clothing suppliers linked to the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region, where the Chinese government has systematically persecuted the Uyghur population and other Turkic minorities.

Represented by law firms Maurice Blackburn and the Human Rights Law Centre, AUTWA is looking to determine whether Kmart followed its ethical sourcing procedures and monitored risks to mount a future legal case that would allege Kmart breached consumer law by making misleading and deceptive statements.

In a statement, a Kmart spokesperson said the retailing giant had been corresponding with AUTWA’s lawyers for more than 12 months and had provided “extensive details” of its ethical sourcing program that had been in place for 15 years.

“We invited the AUTWA to meet with us several times to help us understand their concerns,” said the Kmart spokesperson. “Suppliers in the Kmart ethical sourcing program are regularly monitored through activities including our site visits, audit programs and investigations if we receive any reports or complaints of concern.

“Where we learn of an alleged non-compliance with our code through an audit, site visit or complaint, or by a worker in a supplier’s factory, we take action to investigate and remediate the issue, working collaboratively with the supplier.

“When remediation isn’t possible due to the supplier’s refusal to do so, or repeated failures to make meaningful changes, we will exit the relationship.”

However, Maurice Blackburn principal lawyer Jennifer Kanis said the Australian retailer’s response during the 12 months of correspondence was “not satisfactory” because it had repeated public assertions about its ethical sourcing without providing any evidence.

“What do you do to make these ethical clothing, ethical sourcing claims?” Kanis said. “What do you actually do to back them up? What have you done in particular with these two factories?

“We’re saying, if you say you’re doing audits, and let us see the audits that you’ve done on these companies ... [Kmart has] not provided us with any of those documents. And so that’s why we’ve gone to court.”

Kmart’s spokesperson said it was the first Australian retailer to provide a list of factories it sourced from. The two contentious factories are Jiangsu Guotai Guosheng Co Ltd (Guotai) and Jiangsu Lianfa Textile Co Ltd (Lianfa), listed in Kmart’s 2025 and 2024 factory lists respectively.

Kanis pointed to three main sources, including a 2021 paper from Sheffield Hallam University, a March 2021 letter from a UN special rapporteur issued to Guotai, and a 2020 report by the Australian Strategic Policy Institute that implicated the two companies in using forced labourers in the Uyghur region subjected to serious human rights abuses, such as arbitrary arrests and detention, mass surveillance, religious persecution and more.

“We’re asking for any third-party audits, any audits, any reports of any non-compliance with their ethical sourcing code, any reports or documents saying that they may have suspended or terminated or taken any other remedial action against those producers, and then any information on factory visits or complaints,” said Kanis.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109499

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23432264 (061051ZAUG25) Notable: Sall Grover should pay big damages for ‘misgendering’ trans woman Roxanne Tickle in interviews, court told — Lawyers for Roxanne Tickle told the Federal Court that Giggle app founder Sall Grover should face “significant” aggravated damages for repeatedly referring to Tickle as a man in at least 50 media interviews. Tickle, who is appealing for damages of at least $40,000, argued Grover’s conduct went far beyond a single courtroom incident involving satirical merchandise. Counsel said Grover’s repeated “misgendering” was not bona fide under the Sex Discrimination Act. Grover’s lawyers countered that Tickle’s evidence of loss was “minimal.” J.K. Rowling publicly expressed support for Grover., MISSING MEDIA/FILES: Sall_Grover_right_has_appealed_against_the_finding_she_discriminated_against_trans_woman_Roxanne_Tickle_left.jpg, Giggle_chief_executive_Sall_Grover.jpg, Supporters_of_Ms_Grover_outside_court.jpg, JKR_6.jpg, JKR_7.jpg

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109282

>>109297

>>109467

>>109481

Sall Grover should pay big damages for ‘misgendering’ trans woman Roxanne Tickle in interviews, court told

STEPHEN RICE - 5 August 2025

1/2

Giggle app founder Sall Grover should have to pay hefty damages to trans woman Roxanne Tickle because she “misgendered her” in media interviews, Ms Tickle’s legal team has pleaded in a ­bombshell submission to the Federal Court.

In a submission which, if ­accepted, would have far-reaching implications for free speech, Ms Tickle’s lawyers argued that Ms Grover’s description of Ms Tickle as a man in at least 50 interviews should make her liable for “significant” aggravated damages.

Ms Grover is appealing a decision by judge Robert Bromwich that she indirectly discriminated against Ms Tickle by rejecting her from the Giggle for Girls female-only networking app because she appeared to be a man.

Justice Bromwich had awarded $10,000 damages because Ms Grover had laughed in court at a satirical piece of merchandise – a scented candle – which appeared to mock Ms Tickle.

Ms Tickle is also appealing parts of Justice Bromwich’s decision, asking for a finding of direct rather than indirect discrimination and that the damages be increased to at least $40,000. Ms Tickle had sought $200,000 in damages at the previous trial.

The Giggle v Tickle appeal has gained global attention, with author and prominent women’s rights activist J.K. Rowling expressing support for Ms Grover in an overnight post on social media platform X.

Rowling retweeted a post by Ms Grover of The Australian’s story revealing a submission by the Sex Discrimination Commissioner that trans women “should have legal protections available to pregnant or potentially women”.

Ms Grover had captioned the post: “This is how insane gender ideology is.”

Rowling also sent her support to Ms Grover.

“Good luck, Sall. May the best woman (haha) win x,” she wrote in a post on X.

On Tuesday, counsel for Ms Tickle, Briana Goding, said the $10,000 damages award was insufficient, in part because the beliefs Ms Grover held privately were also being made publicly and expressed in dozens of media interviews.

“There was evidence that Ms Grover had participated in some 50 interviews in relation to this case, and in each of those she used the male pronouns for Ms Tickle, and that on at least 10 occasions she referred to being scared or threatened or harassed by Ms Tickle,” Ms Goding said.

Ms Grover’s conduct “has at the very least been seriously ­aggravating and has caused Ms Tickle injured feelings”, Ms Goding said. “The aggravation and ­injured feelings have mounted up, blow by blow.”

Ms Goding said Justice Bromwich had found the satirical candle to be so offensive that he didn’t repeat the content in his written judgment.

“However, it’s our submission that His Honour ought to have gone beyond that single act of laughing in court and awarded ­aggravated damages for much broader conduct in the ­proceedings.

Those matters included the statement that Ms Tickle was a man, but should also include the fact that in her opening submissions Ms Grover and Giggle stated they “do not know, and cannot admit, whether the applicant is a natural person capable of being sued in the name of Roxanne Tickle”.

“This is not just a delegitimising of gender, but a delegitimising of humanity,” Ms Goding said.

“There’s further, the overall conduct of crowd funding for the case using the demeaning ­material, the promoting of others to purchase material from the Etsy store as well as the laughing in court,” Ms Goding said. Ms Grover has previously stated that she did not have any role in producing or selling the candle merchandise.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109500

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23432280 (061101ZAUG25) Notable: eSafety commissioner says YouTube 'turning blind eye' to child abuse — Australia’s eSafety Commissioner Julie Inman Grant accused major tech companies of failing to prioritise child protection, saying YouTube and Apple could not even disclose how many reports of child sexual abuse material they received or how quickly they acted. A new report found “safety deficiencies” across platforms, including weak detection of live-streamed abuse and failure to use hash-matching on all services. The government last week included YouTube in its teenage social media ban. Inman Grant said companies were “turning a blind eye” to crimes on their platforms., MISSING MEDIA/FILES: eSafety_commissioner_Julie_Inman_Grant_says_large_technology_companies_are_failing_to_answer_basic_questions_about_how_they_are_handling_reports_of_child_abuse_material_on_their_platforms.jpg, 0001.jpg, 0002.jpg, 0003.jpg, 0004.jpg

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109413

>>109415

>>109444

>>>/qresearch/23402364

eSafety commissioner says YouTube 'turning blind eye' to child abuse

Reuters / abc.net.au - 6 August 2025

Australia's internet watchdog has accused the world's biggest social media firms of still "turning a blind eye" to online child sex abuse material on their platforms, and said YouTube in particular had been unresponsive to its enquiries.

In a report released on Wednesday, the eSafety Commissioner said YouTube, along with Apple, failed to track the number of user reports it received of child sex abuse appearing on their platforms and also could not say how long it took them to respond to such reports.

The federal government decided last week to include YouTube in its world-first social media ban for teenagers, following the commissioner's advice to overturn its planned exemption for the Alphabet-owned Google's video-sharing site.

"When left to their own devices, these companies aren't prioritising the protection of children and are seemingly turning a blind eye to crimes occurring on their services," eSafety Commissioner Julie Inman Grant said in a statement.

"No other consumer-facing industry would be given the licence to operate by enabling such heinous crimes against children on their premises, or services."

Google has said previously that abuse material has no place on its platforms and that it uses a range of industry-standard techniques to identify and remove such material.

Meta — owner of Facebook, Instagram and Threads, three of the biggest platforms with more than three billion users worldwide — has said it prohibits graphic videos.

The eSafety Commissioner, an office set up to protect internet users, has mandated Apple, Discord, Google, Meta, Microsoft, Skype, Snap and WhatsApp report on the measures they take to address child exploitation and abuse material in Australia.

The report on their responses so far found a "range of safety deficiencies on their services which increases the risk that child sexual exploitation and abuse material and activity appear on the services".

Safety gaps included failures to detect and prevent live-streaming of the material or block links to known child abuse material, as well as inadequate reporting mechanisms.

It said platforms were also not using hash-matching technology on all parts of their services to identify images of child sexual abuse by checking them against a database.

Google has maintained its anti-abuse measures include hash-matching technology and artificial intelligence.

The Australian regulator said some providers had not made improvements to address these safety gaps on their services despite it putting them on notice in previous years.

"In the case of Apple services and Google's YouTube, they didn't even answer our questions about how many user reports they received about child sexual abuse on their services or details of how many trust and safety personnel Apple and Google have on-staff," Ms Inman Grant said.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-08-06/esafety-commissioner-says-google-turning-blind-eye-child-abuse/105617742

https://www.esafety.gov.au/newsroom/media-releases/tech-giants-are-still-making-minimal-efforts-to-tackle-the-growing-scourge-of-online-child-sexual-abuse

https://www.esafety.gov.au/industry/basic-online-safety-expectations/responses-to-transparency-notices

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109501

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23432296 (061112ZAUG25) Notable: Russia blames Australia war games as it dumps nuclear pact — Russia’s Foreign Ministry declared it no longer considers itself bound by a self-imposed ban on deploying short and intermediate-range nuclear missiles, citing “threats” from US and allied actions. Moscow singled out Washington’s deployment of Typhon launchers to the Philippines and the use of the system in Australia during Talisman Sabre 2025, which also featured the first overseas deployment of the Dark Eagle hypersonic system. The ministry accused the US and partners of ensuring a permanent presence of such weapons, prompting Russia to respond. Dmitry Medvedev warned opponents to “expect further steps.”, MISSING MEDIA/FILES: Dmitry_Medvedev_says_the_decision_is_the_result_of_NATO_s_anti_Russian_activities.jpg, Statement_by_the_Ministry_of_Foreign_Affairs_of_the_Russian_Federation_on_the_moratorium_on_the_deployment_of_ground_launched_intermediate_range_and_shorter_range_missiles.jpg, DM_1.jpg

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109224

>>109320

>>109432

>>109424

Russia blames Australia war games as it dumps nuclear pact

ANNE BARROWCLOUGH - August 05, 2025

Russia has announced it is to consider redeploying short and intermediate range nuclear missiles, claiming military actions by Australia, the US and other allies are putting its national security at risk.

In a statement on Tuesday (AEST), Russia’s Foreign Ministry said Moscow “no longer considers itself bound by the previously adopted self-imposed restrictions.”

”The conditions for maintaining a unilateral moratorium on the deployment of (nuclear) systems have ceased to exist,” the ministry declared.

The missiles are reportedly likely to deployed in Russia’s southwest, near the border with Ukraine and the country’s northeast border with the NATO countries of Norway and Finland, where it has already expanded its military infrastructure.

Vasily Kashi, the director of Russia’s Centre for Comprehensive European and International Studies at the Higher School of Economics told state news agency TASS: “It is obvious that most of (the missiles) should be deployed in the north-western direction, and the others in the southern area of the country’s European part.”

“Choosing not to deploy intermediate-and shorter-range ground-based ballistic and cruise missiles en masse has been very seriously limiting our capabilities,” Mr Kashi added.

The move comes after Donald Trump ordered the deployment of two nuclear submarines to “appropriate regions” in an escalation of what had been an online war of words with Mr Medvedev.

The nuclear sabre-rattling intensified as the US President set a deadline of the end of this week for Russia to take steps toward ending the Ukraine war or face unspecified new sanctions.

Mr Trump on Monday confirmed his special envoy Steve Witkoff would arrive in Moscow either Wednesday or Thursday before the Friday deadline.

In 2019, after Mr Trump withdrew the US from the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces (INF) treaty Moscow said it would not deploy missiles as long as Washington also refrained from doing so.

But in its statement, the ministry said it was withdrawing from the pact due to threats to its national security from Washington’s deployment of Typhon launchers carrying Tomahawk cruise missiles to the Philippines.

The ministry accused Australia and other allies of adding to its security risks by allowing the launchers to be deployed in their regions.

“The same system was used in Australia in July during live-fire exercises as part of the Talisman Sabre 2025 multilateral training,” the ministry said. “During those exercises, the US military carried out the first overseas deployment of the Dark Eagle intermediate-range hypersonic system, openly stating that this was done to ‘project power’ and emphasising the system’s rapid redeployment capability.

“The above actions by the United States and its allies go hand-in-hand with the official statements to ensure the long-term (in fact, permanent) presence of such US weapons in Europe and the Asia-Pacific.”

Accusing the US of “a clear anti-Russian focus,” the ministry said: “Since the situation is developing towards the actual deployment of US-made land-based medium and short-range missiles in Europe and the Asia-Pacific region … the conditions for maintaining a unilateral moratorium on the deployment of similar weapons have disappeared.”

Posting on social media after the foreign ministry’s statement, former Russian president Dmitry Medvedev said the decision “is the result of NATO countries’ anti-Russian policy”.

He added: “This is a new reality all our opponents will have to reckon with. Expect further steps.”

Mr Medvedev last week warned that US support for Ukraine risked sparking a war between Russia and the United States and made reference to Moscow’s “dead hand” automatic nuclear retaliation system.

Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov on Tuesday said officials were happy to meet with Mr Witkoff

“We are always glad to see Mr. Witkoff in Moscow,” he said. “We consider (talks with Witkoff) important, substantive and very useful.”

Mr Trump said on Sunday that Russia had proven to be “pretty good at avoiding sanctions.” “They’re wily characters,” he said.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/world/russia-withdraws-from-nuclear-pact-as-tensions-escalate/news-story/a9648887bd9fdb5e85e882d8678e3063

https://mid.ru/en/foreign_policy/news/2039749/

https://x.com/MedvedevRussiaE/status/1952452686802198557

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109502

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23432316 (061126ZAUG25) Notable: U.S. Embassy Australia Tweets: (Video) @FBIDirectorKash visited Sydney, Australia, to engage in high-level law enforcement meetings aimed at strengthening international partnerships and addressing shared security challenges. These discussions focus on combating transnational crime, cyber threats, and other global issues that require close collaboration with international allies. Building strong partnerships is vital to ensuring a safer and more secure future for all. - #uswithaus @FBI @AusFedPolice @ASIO @nswpolice @MarineCommand @scg, MISSING MEDIA/FILES: USEA_29.jpg, GWdvdRxUh9HavWu2.mp4

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109451

>>109452

>>109469

>>109480

U.S. Embassy Australia Tweets

@FBIDirectorKash visited Sydney, Australia, to engage in high-level law enforcement meetings aimed at strengthening international partnerships and addressing shared security challenges. #uswithaus @FBI @AusFedPolice @ASIO @nswpolice @MarineCommand @scg

https://x.com/USEmbAustralia/status/1952923199479718119

These discussions focus on combating transnational crime, cyber threats, and other global issues that require close collaboration with international allies. Building strong partnerships is vital to ensuring a safer and more secure future for all.

https://x.com/USEmbAustralia/status/1952923272254988481

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109503

File: 5fffd3a7a1ea9ee⋯.jpg (614.12 KB,1920x1080,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23435986 (071027ZAUG25) Notable: Australia could recognise Palestinian state within weeks, won’t wait for Trump — Prime Minister Anthony Albanese is weighing whether to announce recognition of a Palestinian state before September’s UN General Assembly, aligning with France, the UK and Canada. Albanese stressed Australia is a “sovereign government” and would not seek US President Donald Trump’s approval, despite his warnings recognition could reward Hamas. Any Australian move would depend on Hamas leaving Gaza and reforms within the Palestinian Authority. Albanese discussed the issue with Mahmoud Abbas this week, while critics warned recognition risks diverging from US and Israeli policy.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109251

>>109475

>>109479

>>109484

Australia could recognise Palestinian state within weeks, won’t wait for Trump

Paul Sakkal - August 7, 2025

1/2

Australia is considering recognising a Palestinian state before a major United Nations summit in September, without seeking approval from US President Donald Trump.

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has faced a barrage of questions about Australia recognising Palestinian statehood after France vowed to make the move in September. The UK and Canada followed France, attaching conditions to their decisions.

Sources familiar with discussions at the top of the government, not permitted to speak publicly, said the government could make an announcement this month about the position it would take at the September UN General Assembly, where Gaza and the future of a Palestinian state will be a key focus.

Labor ministers, including Treasurer Jim Chalmers and Foreign Minister Penny Wong, have said publicly that recognition was a matter of time, but the government has refused to set a date for the move and made it conditional on Israel’s security and Hamas ceding control of Gaza.

When asked on Thursday if he would clear any step to recognition with Trump before making it public, Albanese brushed off the need to act in line with the US, which is Israel and Australia’s top ally, saying he led a “sovereign government” that would make decisions in the national interest.

Trump has said that Canada’s move to recognise Palestine would reward Hamas and threaten the US’ trade talks with its northern neighbour, but later clarified it was “not a deal-breaker”.

Israel’s war cabinet is due to decide in the early hours of Friday morning (AEST) whether to escalate its campaign in Gaza by moving into the approximately 25 per cent of the battered strip still controlled by Hamas. Israel’s military chief reportedly believes the step is too risky.

Hamas still holds dozens of Israeli hostages, prolonging the conflict that began with its massacre of about 1200 people in Israel on October 7, 2023.

After weeks of images showing starvation in Gaza, France, the UK and Canada sped up plans to recognise Palestine ahead of the New York UN meeting.

Any Australian recognition of Palestine is contingent on Hamas’ removal from Gaza. Other conditions the government has raised include reforming the alternative governing force, the Palestinian Authority, to position it as a moderate ruler of Gaza that commits to leaving Israel in peace. The authority recently committed to holding elections to allow for generational renewal.

Albanese spoke to the authority’s head, Mahmoud Abbas, this week, where he raised the necessity for the governing force in the West Bank to modernise and seek peace. The prime minister has also been building the case for a two-state solution in calls with French President Emmanuel Macron and UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer.

“The prime minister is genuinely working with world leaders on recognition and the broader issues to achieve something practical. The timing on recognition will flow from that,” one Labor MP said.

Albanese’s office was contacted for comment.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109504

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23436001 (071036ZAUG25) Notable: ‘A very big threat’: Australia defends PBS as Trump flags 250% tariffs on medicines — Health Minister Mark Butler has warned Donald Trump’s threat of tariffs of up to 250% on pharmaceuticals is “a very big threat” to $2 billion in Australian exports, particularly CSL’s blood and plasma products. Butler said the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS) was “not up for negotiation” but confirmed he would act on a review to speed up new medicine approvals, long criticised by US firms. Trump said tariffs would rise to 250% within 18 months unless nations stopped “freeloading” off higher US drug prices., MISSING MEDIA/FILES: The_Trump_administration_has_complained_about_other_countries_offering_cheaper_medicines_than_the_US.jpg

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109280

>>109455

>>109456

‘A very big threat’: Australia defends PBS as Trump flags 250% tariffs on medicines

Natassia Chrysanthos - August 7, 2025

1/2

Health Minister Mark Butler is planning to speed up medicine approvals as US President Donald Trump threatens to put tariffs of up to 250 per cent on pharmaceutical products, which could affect $2 billion worth of Australian exports.

Butler said Trump’s latest threat would not change the discount Australians received on medicines through the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme, but revealed he would get advice within days about accelerating the approvals process for new drugs in Australia – a key issue that US pharmaceutical giants have raised with Trump.

Speeding up the timeframe for US medicines to land on pharmacy shelves could improve the Australian government’s standing with the Trump administration, although it does not deal with the White House’s bigger concern that Americans pay more for medicines than citizens of other countries.

Trump’s anger with what he called “foreign freeloading nations” prompted him to threaten tariffs of up to 250 per cent on drug imports this week.

Butler said it was a “a very big threat”. “It’s one we’re working very hard to engage with the Americans on,” Butler said on Thursday.

“The numbers are jumping around … They were 200 per cent a couple of weeks ago, and now they’re 250 per cent potentially. They are very, very big tariffs.

“We are making the case very strongly, but I’m not going to pretend that the US administration doesn’t appear to be pretty serious about this.”

Australia’s PBS – under which the government subsidises drugs and Australians can buy expensive medicines for a maximum price of $31.60, soon to become $25 – has been brought up repeatedly during Trump’s trade wars as US pharmaceutical companies push the president to punish countries that limit their market access.

The big drug companies say the PBS delivers a hit to their potential profits because they are forced to negotiate with the Australian government, which pushes them to offer the lowest possible price. They also say the PBS takes too long to go through its process of deciding to approve medicines and, in doing so, delays the arrival of their product on Australian pharmacy shelves.

Medicines Australia, the nation’s peak pharmaceutical industry group, also takes issue with the approvals process, claiming it takes an average 466 days for new drugs to become subsidised after being approved for use. In other countries, it says, this process can be done in 90 days.

Butler said he agreed that medicines should get into the Australian system more quickly, but blamed the complexity of policy reform for the delays in acting on the issue, which he first commissioned a review about in 2022. It delivered 50 recommendations in May 2024.

“I’m expecting a report this week or next week on ways in which we can implement a series of recommendations to make our medicines approval system quicker,” Butler told the ABC on Thursday.

“We’re living through this turbocharged period of discovery that’s bringing more and more new medicines. So, making sure we can assess them and approve them very quickly ... is something I’ve said is a real priority for us this term.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109505

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23436017 (071045ZAUG25) Notable: Leaked letters and closed-door talks with PM: Media bosses’ AI fight — Australia’s major media companies have joined authors, artists and musicians to oppose a Productivity Commission proposal to exempt AI firms from copyright laws, warning it would “legalise theft” of creative work. Nine’s Matt Stanton and other media chiefs have lobbied Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and ministers directly, pushing for regulation and commercial deals with AI firms. The Albanese government insists it has “no plans” to amend copyright laws, while Opposition Leader Sussan Ley said it was “not appropriate for big tech to steal” Australian content., MISSING MEDIA/FILES: Michael_Miller_executive_chair_of_News_Corp_Australasia_left_with_Prime_Minister_and_Anthony_Albanese_and_Daily_Telegraph_editor_Ben_English_during_the_election_campaign_in_April.jpg

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Leaked letters and closed-door talks with PM: Media bosses’ AI fight

Paul Sakkal - August 6, 2025

1/2

Australia’s media bosses are directly lobbying Prime Minister Anthony Albanese on the threat artificial intelligence poses to news outlets, uniting with authors, musicians and artists to slam a proposal to waive copyright laws for multibillion-dollar AI companies.

The prospect of large language models such as ChatGPT scraping articles, songs and art without paying creators burst into the spotlight on Wednesday after the government’s think tank, the Productivity Commission, proposed a copyright exemption for AI firms training their models.

A letter from Australia’s top media firms and creative bodies, sent to Attorney-General Michelle Rowland on July 11 and obtained by this masthead, vowed to fight any move to weaken copyright protections, opening a fresh battle between local media outlets and foreign technology companies.

Nine chief executive Matt Stanton took the media’s fears directly to Albanese in private talks last month, as Labor tries to balance its agenda to rein in digital behemoths against the spectre of retaliation from the Trump administration against countries that regulate US tech giants.

The media companies’ concern centres on the way companies such as Google are reconstituting information from publishers and presenting it as AI answers to search queries, which one study found resulted in up to 80 per cent fewer views of underlying articles.

Stanton argued weakening copyright protections to allow AI firms to legally obtain Australian data – which has already largely happened due to it being a legal grey area – would amount to legalising theft.

“They don’t care for permission, they ignore direct requests to stop and are now actively campaigning our politicians to make this theft a legal and acceptable practice,” Stanton told this masthead, which Nine owns.

“To even contemplate making this behaviour legal is beyond comprehension. Yet that is the risk presented to us if our investment in Australian journalists and local news reporting is rendered worthless because these generative AI platforms can simply take it.”

“If Australian journalism is swiped into submission it is our democracy, our identity as Australians and our own voice as a people that is at risk.”

A united front of news bosses met with Communications Minister Anika Wells and Assistant Treasurer Daniel Mulino on Tuesday. They included Stanton, News Corp chief Michael Miller, Seven West Media’s Jeff Howard, the ABC’s Hugh Marks, and Guardian Australia’s Lenore Taylor. Those outlets were all contacted for comment.

The group is also pushing Labor to get moving on its promised incentive scheme to charge tech giants such as Meta for Australian news shared on social media and search platforms.

The company, which owns Facebook and Instagram, has refused to pay media companies under existing legislation and suggested it would remove all news content if it was pushed by the government.

But multiple sources familiar with the talks, who requested anonymity because they were private, said the outlets were mulling a request for the government to intervene and help them strike commercial deals with AI firms. Such a move would only come after the conclusion of talks over the incentive scheme, the sources stressed.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109506

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23436029 (071053ZAUG25) Notable: Law ‘never intended boys to sleep in girls’ dormitories’, court told — The Federal Court has heard final submissions in Sall Grover’s appeal against a ruling that she indirectly discriminated against transgender woman Roxanne Tickle by rejecting her from the Giggle networking app. Counsel for the Lesbian Action Group argued parliament never intended biological men to enter female-only spaces such as shelters, schools, or lesbian events. Equality Australia countered that sex was non-binary and socially defined, while the Sex Discrimination Commissioner argued “woman” includes trans women. Grover’s lawyers warned expanded protections risk undermining safe spaces for both women and transgender women., MISSING MEDIA/FILES: Transgender_woman_Roxanne_Tickle_left_and_Giggle_chief_executive_Sall_Grover_outside_the_Federal_Court_on_Wednesday.jpg

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109499

Law ‘never intended boys to sleep in girls’ dormitories’, court told

STEPHEN RICE - August 06, 2025

1/2

Parliament could not have intended that biological boys would sleep in girls’ dormitories or that men would attend lesbian parties when it introduced changes to the Sex Discrimination Act, an appeal in the landmark case of Giggle v Tickle has been told.

The consequences of saying sex is non-binary and changeable “cannot be objectively sustained”, counsel for the Lesbian Action Group, Leigh Howard, told a Full Bench of the Federal Court on Wednesday.

The court heard final submissions in the appeal by Giggle app founder Sall Grover against a decision by judge Robert Bromwich that she indirectly discriminated against transgender woman Roxanne Tickle by rejecting her from the female-only Giggle networking app because she appeared to be a man.

The LAG has been granted intervener status in the case because of its special interest in creating female-only spaces.

It says the conclusion that a biological man who identifies as a woman is a “woman” under the Sex Discrimination Act has serious unintended consequences, including that charitable accommodation providers would have to admit biological men into domestic violence shelters and rape crisis centres and police body searches of women could be carried out by biological men.

“The legislature did not intend this,” Mr Howard told the court.

“It did not intend for biological boys to attend all-girls schools, or for biological boys to sleep in the girls’ dormitory, or for men to ­attend a lesbian party.”

Mr Howard addressed the complexity introduced into the case by the interpretations of sex and gender offered by Ms Tickle and two other parties granted intervener status in the case, the Sex Discrimination Commissioner and gay and trans lobby group Equality Australia.

“This is an act that touches upon all aspects of society … it needs to be interpreted by the nurse at St Vincent’s Hospital, the market stall operator at Paddy’s Markets, the Big Four bank on Market Street, and the institutional department in Canberra – it has to work for everyone,” Mr Howard said.

“It has to be read sensibly and logically, produce coherent results that are understandable and capable of application by everyone and also all stakeholders of differing sophistication.”

Mr Howard also raised what he referred to as “the female elephant in the room” – the For Women Scotland case in which the UK Supreme Court ruled in April this year that “the terms woman and sex in the Equality Act 2010 refer to a biological woman and biological sex”. While acknowledging the different jurisdiction, Mr Howard suggested that, after analysing the balance of the act in that case, “you cannot in their situation lead to the conclusion that the legislature intended there to be a concept of anything but a biological woman under their legislation.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109507

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23444208 (091153ZAUG25) Notable: Video: ‘Cowards and goons’: Premier condemns neo-Nazi march through Melbourne CBD — Around 100 masked members of the far-right National Socialist Network, led by white supremacist Thomas Sewell, marched through Melbourne’s Bourke Street Mall before dispersing at Flagstaff Gardens. A 26-year-old man who confronted the group was assaulted and hospitalised. No arrests were made, with police citing a strong presence to maintain order. Premier Jacinta Allan denounced the protesters as “cowards” and “goons,” pledging new police powers to unmask participants. Opposition Leader Brad Battin said Victoria had become the “hate capital,” while the Anti-Defamation Commission called the rally a “war parade.”

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

‘Cowards and goons’: Premier condemns neo-Nazi march through Melbourne CBD

MARCUS DE BLONK SMITH - 9 August 2025

A group of neo-Nazi protesters who marched through the Melbourne CBD have been condemned by Victorian Premier Jacinta Allan as “cowards” and “goons”, as she vowed to introduce stronger powers for police.

About 100 people dressed in black face coverings from the National Socialist Network - a far-right neo-Nazi group - marched through the Bourke Street mall at 12.40am on Saturday.

As the group made its way along Bourke Street several police cars drove alongside the protesters.

In videos posted to social media, members of the protest group, led by white supremacist leader Thomas Sewell, can be seen waving the Australian and National Socialist Network flags and holding banners stating: “White man fight back”.

A 26-year-old man who confronted the group was allegedly assaulted and was taken to hospital with non-life threatening injuries.

According to police, the group walked to Flagstaff Gardens where they dispersed at about 1.25am.

A police spokesman said no arrests were made throughout the protest, and added that “police had a strong presence to maintain community safety and to prevent any breach of the peace”.

“Victoria Police respects the right to protest, however, there is absolutely no place for such anti-Semitic, racist or hate-based behaviour in our society and police will not tolerate such activity.”

Victorian Premier Jacinta Allan condemned the march in a statement, saying: “Nazis don’t belong in this country and they know it. That’s why they hide behind masks in the dark.”

She also thanked officers for maintaining “public order”, and said police needed “more powers, and we’re giving it to them”.

“Our criminal Anti-Vilification laws come into effect next month,” the premier said in a statement.

“We will introduce powers for police to unmask cowards at protests after that. We’re not afraid of these goons – but we won’t tolerate them either.”

In a post on social media, Opposition Leader Brad Battin described the march as “appalling”.

“This behaviour is unacceptable and does not align with the values of an inclusive, tolerant and multicultural state,” he said.

Mr Battin accused the government of being “afraid to take a stand” against anti-Semitic and racist protests and had “lost control of our streets”.

“Protesters are now travelling from interstate to join these hateful rallies. Under the Allan Labor government, Victoria has become the hate capital - a place where this behaviour is allowed to thrive.”

David Southwick, opposition spokesman for police and corrections, said that both the far-right and far-left were “taking advantage of a weak and ineffective government”.

He accused the Victorian government of failing “to confront rising violence and extremism” across the state.

Dr Dvir Abramovich, Chair of the Anti-Defamation Commission, described the march as a “war parade”.

“Yesterday, Melbourne witnessed a scene that should freeze the blood of every Australian: an army of neo-Nazis marching in formation through our streets,” he said.

Dr Abramovich, who led the national campaign that resulted in the banning of the Nazi swastika, salute and sale of Third Reich memorabilia, called on politicians to act.

“I call on the Prime Minister and parliament to outlaw every neo-Nazi and white-supremacist organisation operating in this country,” he said.

“These are not activists … (and) the law must recognise them for what they are – organised extremists.”

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/cowards-and-goons-premier-condemns-neonazi-march-through-melbourne-cbd/news-story/941c141c7f50866d3263035925896448

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lZJW3pQtCcY

https://qresear.ch/?q=Thomas+Sewell

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109508

File: a5e4cb21236b0b9⋯.mp4 (12.14 MB,304x540,76:135,Clipboard.mp4)

File: 362fdb61d923c77⋯.jpg (173.87 KB,1024x768,4:3,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 7bd1d142969eff0⋯.jpg (255.25 KB,1280x960,4:3,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23444222 (091204ZAUG25) Notable: Outrage as 100+ masked neo-Nazis march on streets of Melbourne, Bacchus Marsh — More than 100 masked members of the far-right National Socialist Network marched through Melbourne’s CBD early Saturday before gathering at Bacchus Marsh and later holding a “national conference” at a Ballan caravan park attended by nearly 250 people. Police, who accused the group of assaulting a 26-year-old man, made no arrests. Premier Jacinta Allan vowed new powers to unmask “goons,” while Opposition leaders branded Victoria the “hate state.” Neo-Nazi leaders Thomas Sewell and Nathan Bull attended the gathering, where the group discussed forming a federal political party.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109507

Outrage as 100+ masked neo-Nazis march on streets of Melbourne, Bacchus Marsh

Victorian Neo-Nazis are gearing up to register their own political party, holding talks at their “national conference” after hundreds of masked members marched through CBD as powerless police watched on.

Regan Hodge and Anna Shreeves - August 9, 2025

1/2

More than 100 neo-Nazis who marched through the city before holding a mass gathering at a caravan park were labelled as “gutless cowards” and “goons” from both sides of politics.

Police were virtually powerless as the crew of far-right neo-Nazis marched through the CBD in the early hours of Saturday morning.

Police vehicles were seen driving alongside members of the National Socialist Network (NSN) as they marched along Bourke St from 12.40am.

Police accused the neo-Nazis, who wore black clothing and face coverings, of assaulting a 26-year-old man who confronted the group in the city.

Members and supporters of the NSN later gathered at a football ground in Bacchus Marsh where a small group of counter-protesters met them about 10am on Saturday.

They shamed the far-right group through a series of banners and posters as about a dozen police officers stood by.

“Insecure men’s retreat 2025,” one banner read.

It is understood supporters of the NSN flew into Melbourne to attend Saturday afternoon’s “national conference” — later held at a caravan park in Ballan.

The neo-Nazis were driven from the Bacchus Marsh train station, which is opposite the football ground, to the caravan park on mini buses.

Nearly 250 members of the NSN were in attendance.

The Sunday Herald Sun can reveal that the group continued discussions on their hopes and plans to form a federal political party.

Just 1500 members are required to apply to the Australian Electoral Commission to form an official federal party, but that number has not yet been reached.

“We’re having a community, a family, an athletic event to celebrate our culture and identity as white Australians,”controversial white supremacist leader Thomas Sewell said on Saturday.

Members of the NSN have so far escaped any criminal charges over a protest on the steps of Parliament in December, in whichthey chanted “Jews must go”.

Victoria Police have referred charges under the state’s racial and religious vilification laws but the Herald Sun last week revealed the Office of Public Prosecutions (OPP) was still investigating.

Jewish Community Council of Victoria president Philip Zajac said the government “must act now” to stamp out the “hate and menace” on Victorian streets.

He labelled the group of neo-Nazis a “tiny fringe rejected by the overwhelming majority of Victorians”.

“They will not intimidate us,” he said.

“Parliament is sitting this week.

“Eight months after promising anti-masking and anti-hate symbol laws, the Government must act now.”

Premier Jacinta Allan said police would soon have the power to unmask the “goons” who hid their faces in the middle of the night.

“Nazis don’t belong in this country and they know it. That’s why they hide behind masks in the dark,” she said.

“I thank Police who maintained the public order. It’s clear they need more powers, and we’re giving it to them.

“Our criminal Anti-Vilification laws come into effect next month. We will introduce powers for police to unmask cowards at protests after that.

“We’re not afraid of these goons — but we won’t tolerate them either.”

Police will still have to seek approval from the OPP to lay charges under the anti-vilification laws, potentially delaying charges.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109509

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23444254 (091217ZAUG25) Notable: Economic, defence ties on the table as NZ hosts its ‘only ally’ - New Zealand Prime Minister Christopher Luxon has called Australia his country’s “only ally” as he prepares to host Anthony Albanese for bilateral talks in Queenstown. The leaders will discuss strengthening economic integration, security ties, and Pacific defence cooperation amid growing Chinese assertiveness. New Zealand has doubled its defence budget, emphasising interoperability with Australia, while both governments remain aligned on Middle East issues, including recognition of a Palestinian state as “a matter of when, not if.” Tourism levies may emerge as a point of contention., MISSING MEDIA/FILES: New_Zealand_Prime_Minister_Christopher_Luxon_and_Anthony_Albanese_at_Parliament_House_in_Canberra_in_2024.jpg, New_Zealand_Prime_Minister_Christopher_Luxon_and_Anthony_Albanese_speak_to_reporters_at_Taramea_in_Queenstown_New_Zealand.jpg

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Economic, defence ties on the table as NZ hosts its ‘only ally’

ANNE BARROWCLOUGH - 9 August 2025

1/2

New Zealand Prime Minister Christopher Luxon has described Australia as New Zealand’s “only ally in a world of uncertainty”, as he prepares to host Anthony Albanese for bilateral talks this weekend.

The remarks illustrate New Zealand’s increasing determination to tighten ties with Australia, particularly in regards to security in the region, and the countries’ economic relations.

Both areas will be front and centre of talks between the two leaders when they meet in the mountain resort town of Queenstown, in the South Island.

Mr Albanese will arrive in Queenstown on Saturday for his second annual Leaders Meeting with Mr Luxon. The two men held their first Leaders Meeting in Canberra last year but they have met several times since, during which they have forged a warm relationship as they face increasing turbulence in their economic and strategic spheres.

After arriving late morning on Saturday, Mr Albanese will be met with a “powhiri” (traditional Maori greeting) before bilateral talks with Mr Luxon, followed by a roundtable with business leaders including Qantas CEO Vanessa Hudson.

Describing the relationship between the two countries as a “tremendous bedrock of certainty”, Mr Luxon told NZ media: “They are family, they are our only ally. In a world of incredible uncertainty there is a tremendous bedrock of certainty in the relationship between Australia and New Zealand.”

Mr Albanese echoed his words, saying: “As neighbours, friends and family, the bonds between our countries, our economies and our communities are unmatched.”

There has been a paradigm shift in the friendship between the nations’ leaders since the notoriously tense relationship between former NZ prime minister Jacinda Ardern and Australian counterpart Scott Morrison. Mr Albanese soothed those tensions with his removal of the controversial policy of deporting NZ criminals, and his 2023 decision to fast-track Australian citizenship visas for Kiwis.

But while both sides are intent on building on their Single Economic Market after previously committing to a Trans-Tasman Roadmap to 2035, one sticking point this weekend may be Wellington’s recent decision to start charging international tourists fees of up to $36 to enter its famous natural sites – which are free to locals.

This may be a point of debate between the two leaders, Democracy Project think tank analyst Geoffrey Miller said.

“New Zealand needs to be careful about shooting themselves in the foot with levies,” Mr Miller told The Australian. “Tourism hasn’t really recovered since Covid and we should be welcoming Australians and other foreigners, not adding taxes to their already expensive trip.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109510

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23444271 (091223ZAUG25) Notable: Anthony Albanese, Christopher Luxon united on Gaza, China for trans-Tasman talks - Anthony Albanese and Christopher Luxon presented a united front during bilateral talks in Queenstown, aligning on Gaza, China and trade. Both leaders reaffirmed that recognition of Palestinian statehood is a matter of “when, not if,” while condemning Israel’s planned occupation of Gaza City as worsening the humanitarian crisis. They also pledged closer defence and security cooperation amid China’s growing regional assertiveness, while maintaining engagement with Beijing despite differences. Trade linkages, Trump’s tariff agenda and deportation disputes were also on the agenda., MISSING MEDIA/FILES: Anthony_Albanese_met_with_New_Zealand_Prime_Minister_Christopher_Luxon_for_the_two_countries_annual_talks_on_Saturday.jpg, Anthony_Albanese_and_Christopher_Luxon_held_a_joint_press_conference.jpg, China_conducted_live_fire_exercises_in_the_Tasman_Sea_which_separates_Australia_and_New_Zealand_earlier_this_year.jpg

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109509

Anthony Albanese, Christopher Luxon united on Gaza, China for trans-Tasman talks

JACK QUAIL - 9 August 2025

Anthony Albanese and Christopher Luxon have presented a united front in response to the deepening conflict in Gaza and heightened Chinese assertiveness in the Pacific, hailing the trans-Tasman alliance as a source of stability in turbulent times.

During their annual bilateral talks in a wintry Queenstown on Saturday, discussions between the pair also focused on deepening trade linkages amid Donald Trump’s aggressive tariff agenda and the ongoing dispute between the countries over Australia’s deportation of New Zealand criminals.

Against a backdrop of snow-capped peaks, the Australian Prime Minister and his delegation were greeted in New Zealand with a traditional Māori ceremony known as “powhiri”, before he and Mr Luxon held formal leaders’ talks followed by a roundtable with business leaders from both nations.

The trans-Tasman meeting comes as Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu vowed on Friday that his country’s military would take full control of Gaza City, defying mounting international calls to end the conflict and moves by France, Britain and Canada to progress recognition of a Palestinian state.

Asked about the matter at a joint press conference following the leaders’ meeting, Mr Albanese gave few specifics about his discussions with Mr Luxon on the subject of statehood, but noted that his government would “continue to play a role” in steps to resolve the conflict.

Mr Luxon – who leads a centre-right coalition government – was similarly vague on the subject of Palestinian statehood and did not comment on the necessary prerequisites for New Zealand to move ahead with recognition when asked. He said, however, that Australians and New Zealanders were “horrified” by the humanitarian crisis unfolding in Gaza.

“Military action that we’ve seen is not the way to solve this problem. It requires diplomacy. It requires dialogue,” he told reporters.

Asked whether recognising Palestine could hinder trade talks with the United States — after the US President expressed doubts about securing a deal with Canada after it said it would move to officially acknowledge statehood — both leaders said it would not influence their support.

The positions of the Australian and New Zealand governments on Palestinian statehood are completely aligned — that it is not matter of if, but rather of when, recognition occurs.

Earlier on Saturday, Australia’s Foreign Minister Penny Wong and her New Zealand counterpart Winston Peters joined foreign ministers from Britain, Germany and Italy to warn the Netanyahu government against its planned occupation of Gaza.

“It will aggravate the catastrophic humanitarian situation, endanger the lives of the hostages, and further risk the mass displacement of civilians,” the joint statement read.

The annual bilateral talks also canvassed security and defence co-operation amid an increasingly assertive China, which sparked alarm in Canberra and Wellington by conducting live-fire exercises in the Tasman Sea in February and March.

While both Mr Albanese and Mr Luxon have met with Chinese President Xi Jinping in recent weeks, Beijing’s expanding footprint in the region remains a shared concern. New Zealand in June suspended aid to the Cook Islands after it signed a number of controversial security pacts with China earlier this year.

Both leaders affirmed they would “disagree where we must” with Beijing, with Mr Albanese citing China’s human rights record and non-democratic governance, while Mr Luxon emphasised the importance of maintaining ongoing engagement despite these differences.

“Good partners should be not afraid to actually talk about those things and do so in a way that we can manage those differences as a consequence of that,” he said.

The meeting was the fourth between Mr Albanese and Mr Luxon, however, the pair have known each other for more than a decade in their previous roles as transport minister and chief executive of Air New Zealand, respectively.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/anthony-albanese-christopher-luxon-united-on-gaza-china-for-transtasman-talks/news-story/d35dea9fa8a79513f2b73aaf71bf5247

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109511

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23444314 (091251ZAUG25) Notable: Video: Israeli security cabinet agrees to major escalation in Gaza - Israel has approved plans for its military to seize Gaza City as part of a broader ambition to take full control of the enclave, rejecting international calls for a ceasefire. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said the goal was to defeat Hamas and later hand Gaza to Arab forces, not the Palestinian Authority. Foreign Minister Penny Wong said the move would “worsen the humanitarian catastrophe,” while Israel’s opposition leaders warned it risked the lives of remaining hostages. The war has already killed over 61,000 Palestinians, Gaza’s Health Ministry says.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109251

>>109484

>>109503

Israeli security cabinet agrees to major escalation in Gaza

Matthew Knott and David Crowe - August 8, 2025

1/2

Israel will escalate the war in Gaza by seeking to take control of the devastated enclave’s most populated city under plans approved by the country’s security cabinet in a marathon meeting, shunning global calls for a ceasefire.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu outlined his ambitions to conquer the entirety of the Gaza Strip to defeat Hamas, a listed terror group in Australia, on Friday, but the stated plan centres on an initial military operation to take over Gaza City as the next step toward broader goals.

The security cabinet set out five principles after a contested vote and decided the Israel Defence Forces would pursue security control over the Gaza Strip before one day ensuring a new civil government take over the enclave.

“The [Israel Defence Forces] will prepare to take control of Gaza City while providing humanitarian aid to the civilian population outside the combat zones,” Netanyahu’s office said in a statement.

The plan, which has drawn heated criticism from Netanyahu’s main political opponents in Israel, could take months to come into effect.

Israeli media outlets have reported that the military takeover of Gaza City may not occur until after the second anniversary of the October 7 attacks, following the dispersal of civilians to other areas.

Foreign Minister Penny Wong said the Australian government opposed the plans.

“Australia calls on Israel to not go down this path, which will only worsen the humanitarian catastrophe in Gaza,” she said.

“Permanent forced displacement is a violation of international law. With international partners, Australia maintains our call for a ceasefire, the return of hostages and aid to flow unimpeded.”

But opposition foreign affairs spokeswoman Michaelia Cash countered Wong’s statement and declared the operational tactics were a matter for the Israeli government.

“What disturbs me more than anything is that so many now – but in particular Penny Wong – skip over this important detail: this war could end tomorrow if Hamas released the hostages and laid down their arms,” Cash said.

Most of the 2 million Palestinians in Gaza are currently in areas outside direct control by Israel, with many in Gaza City – highlighting the risks to civilians in any military operation to take over the city. Israel says it controls 75 per cent of the Gaza Strip.

The Israeli cabinet canvassed several other options on the best way to conduct the war when it met in the early hours of Friday, AEST, but rejected them.

“A decisive majority of security cabinet ministers believed that the alternative plan ... would neither achieve the defeat of Hamas nor the return of the hostages,” the prime minister’s office said, acknowledging the divisions.

The first four principles agreed to end the war were the disarming of Hamas, the return of all hostages living and dead, the demilitarisation of the Gaza Strip and Israeli security control in the Gaza Strip.

The fifth principle was the establishment of an alternative civil administration over the territory that would be neither Hamas nor the Palestinian Authority.

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has joined other leaders in speaking to Palestinian Authority president Mahmoud Abbas in recent weeks, highlighting a global push to make the governing body in the West Bank a key part of a two-state solution that would include Gaza.

Speaking before the security cabinet meeting, which ran for 10 hours through the night, Netanyahu had said Israel planned to take control over all of Gaza and eventually hand it off to Arab forces opposed to Hamas.

Israel’s top general, Eyal Zamir, reportedly warned that it would endanger the remaining 20 or so living hostages held by Hamas and further strain Israel’s army after nearly two years of war. Many families of hostages are also opposed, fearing further escalation will doom their loved ones.

Israel’s centrist opposition leader Yair Lapid blasted the security cabinet’s decision as “a disaster that will lead to many more disasters”.

“This is exactly what Hamas wanted: for Israel to be trapped in the field without a goal, without defining the picture of the day after, in a useless occupation that no one understands where it is leading,” he said on social media.

Yair Golan, the leader of the centre-left Democrats party, said the move was “a death sentence for the hostages” and would prove to be a “disaster for generations”.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109512

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23444355 (091309ZAUG25) Notable: Donald Trump’s Pentagon warns Anthony Albanese that he is not spending enough on defence and AUKUS — The Pentagon has warned Australia will struggle to defend itself or meet AUKUS obligations unless defence spending lifts to 3.5% of GDP, far above the current 2.04%. Officials said AUKUS was “an expensive thing” requiring greater investment, while noting allies needed clarity on commitments in potential conflicts with China. NATO countries recently pledged 5% of GDP on defence, partly by including infrastructure like roads and ports, while Anthony Albanese has resisted using such accounting methods to inflate Australia’s totals. Critics in Washington fear Australia lacks near-term deterrence., MISSING MEDIA/FILES: Prime_Minister_Anthony_Albanese_The_Pentagon_is_warning_Australia_s_defence_budget_must_rise.jpg, US_President_Donald_Trump_has_been_pressuring_US_allies_including_Australia_to_radically_lift_their_defence_spending.jpg

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109299

>>109316

>>109318

>>109405

Donald Trump’s Pentagon warns Anthony Albanese that he is not spending enough on defence and AUKUS

JOE KELLY and GEOFF CHAMBERS - 9 August 2025

1/2

The Pentagon says Australia will be unable to adequately defend ­itself and deliver on its AUKUS commitments unless it massively lifts its defence budget, and argues 3.5 per cent of GDP is now the “new global standard”, in the Trump administration’s strongest warning yet to Anthony Albanese.

The warning sets up a collision with the Labor government, which has repeatedly rebuffed calls from Washington to lift its defence spending.

It also provides an insight into how seriously this issue is viewed by the US and the sorts of conclusions that may be drawn in the ­review of the landmark AUKUS pact being led by Pentagon policy chief Elbridge Colby.

The comments from the US Department of Defence come as the Prime Minister prepares for a gruelling schedule of international trips over the next three months, including a September visit to the UN General Assembly in New York, as he continues to pursue an in-person meeting with Donald Trump.

In a briefing provided to The Australian on Thursday local time, the Pentagon flagged its concerns that Australia would not be able to both modernise the ADF and achieve its objectives under the AUKUS framework with ­defence spending pegged to its current trajectory.

Under the AUKUS plan, Washington will transfer to Australia at least three Virginia-class nuclear-powered submarines from the 2030s – so long as the President is confident it will not degrade America’s own “undersea capabilities” and is consistent with US national security interests.

However, senior US defence figures appear increasingly concerned that a failure by Australia to spend more on defence could have a bearing on the nation’s ability to operate as an effective ally in deterring a more aggressive Beijing. “For Australia in particular, it is vitally important that they are able to raise defence spending to 3.5 per cent of GDP,” a US Defence official told The Australian.

“That will allow them to generate and field the kind of forces required not just to defend themselves but work together closely with us to maintain deterrence in the region.

“It is not an abstraction. This is a concrete objective. AUKUS is an expensive thing. Increasing defence spending is going to be vitally important for Australia to achieve its stated objectives under AUKUS while also modernising the rest of the ADF. At a certain point, it’s just maths. They need to spend more on defence.

“I think we can say with confidence that if Australia does not raise defence spending it is going to struggle to field the forces required to defend Australia but also to make good on its commitments to others.

“But we are hopeful that Australia will be able to lean in and make these decisions – 3.5 per cent of GDP on defence spending; that is the new global standard.”

Jim Chalmers’ most recent budget revealed Australian defence spending would rise to nearly $59bn, or 2.04 per cent of GDP, this financial year, but only 32 per cent of the money is going towards the acquisition of new weapons and equipment.

The outcome is in line with the government’s plan to lift defence spending by $50.3bn over the next decade, but the bulk of the increases are back-ended and don’t start kicking in before 2028-29.

US Studies Centre chief executive Michael Green told The Australian defence spending didn’t increase “until the second five year increment” and expected that, as part of the AUKUS review, “there’ll be discussions about (it)”.

Dr Green, who served on the staff of the National Security Council at the White House from 2001 to 2005, said the “question will likely come up: do we (Australia) have adequate deterrence in the near term. And I expect the US position will be, ‘not really’.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109513

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23444385 (091326ZAUG25) Notable: ‘Bad timing’: US-India tensions throw Albanese-Trump meeting into doubt - Australia’s plans for Prime Minister Anthony Albanese to meet US President Donald Trump in India next month are in jeopardy after Trump doubled tariffs on Indian exports to 50 per cent, provoking anger in New Delhi. The Quad summit, intended as Albanese’s first in-person meeting with Trump, is now uncertain, raising doubts over the group’s future role countering China. Analysts warn Trump’s transactional approach undermines long-term US-India cooperation, with tensions over Russia ties, immigration, and trade priorities clouding prospects for the summit., MISSING MEDIA/FILES: Indian_Prime_Minister_Narendra_Modi_Australian_Prime_Minister_Anthony_Albanese_and_US_President_Donald_Trump.jpg

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>73662 (pb)

>>109234

>>109241

>>109325

‘Bad timing’: US-India tensions throw Albanese-Trump meeting into doubt

Matthew Knott - August 7, 2025

1/2

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese’s plans to meet US President Donald Trump in India next month have been thrown into turmoil by the intensifying trade battle between Washington and New Delhi, raising doubts about the future of a four-nation grouping’s ability to counter China.

Trump announced on Thursday that he would double tariffs on Indian exports to the United States to 50 per cent, among the highest in the world, to punish the nation for buying oil from Russia, sparking an angry reaction from New Delhi.

Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi has been preparing to host the leaders of Australia, the US and Japan for a summit of the Quad grouping in early September, providing a platform for Albanese’s first in-person meeting with Trump.

The Quad leaders have met every year since 2021 as part of the high-profile partnership designed to showcase the ability of the nations to work together as a democratic counterweight to authoritarian China’s growing influence in the Indo-Pacific.

Beijing has loathed the Quad since its inception, blasting it as an “exclusive clique” and falsely characterising it as an “Asian NATO”, although the group is not underpinned by a treaty.

Ian Hall, an expert on Indian politics at Griffith University, said it was “a toss up” whether the September summit, which has not been formally confirmed, would go ahead given the rising hostility between Trump and Modi, who until recently revelled in a seemingly friendly relationship.

“The Quad is going to have to come up with a whole new agenda and to find a way to hold a summit in India. It’s very unclear if that will happen,” he said.

“For 25 years, the US has seen India’s rising prosperity and influence as being in its interests. That has just disappeared under ‘America first’ and that’s a big problem.”

Albanese tried to meet Trump to discuss issues including tariffs and AUKUS at a meeting of the G7 group of countries in June, but the president left early as conflict escalated in the Middle East.

If the Quad summit is shelved, Albanese’s next chance to meet Trump would be during a visit to the US for the United Nations General Assembly in New York in late September.

Beyond whether a summit can be arranged, Hall said there were profound questions about the purpose of the partnership now that Trump is pursuing a mercantilist, transactional foreign policy vision.

Issues the Quad focused on during Joe Biden’s presidency – such as green technology and health security – will be of little interest to Trump, Hall said.

“The question is: what on earth are they going to talk about?” he said. “I can’t see an agenda, to be honest.”

As well as the punishing tariffs, Hall said that US-India relations have been damaged by Trump’s harsh immigration policies and his efforts to deepen ties with Pakistan, a key strategic rival to India.

Lavina Lee, an expert in security studies at Macquarie University, said: “This is really bad timing for the Quad, and the summit may need to be postponed.”

She said: “Previous US administrations have been irritated by India’s ties with Russia and its protectionist economy, but put that aside for the bigger prize of securing India’s support in the geopolitical competition with China. In a prime example of disruption, Trump is showing he has different priorities.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109514

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23444410 (091334ZAUG25) Notable: Alleged Chinese spy ran business in heart of Canberra society - A Chinese-born Australian permanent resident accused of spying on the Guan Yin Citta Buddhist association for Beijing’s Public Security Bureau has been revealed as a businesswoman active in Canberra’s social circles. Court-ordered suppression prevents her identification, but her ventures may have brought her into proximity with politicians, staffers and journalists. Arrested under Operation Autumn Shield, she faces up to 15 years’ jail if convicted of reckless foreign interference. The case, one of the first to target a community group under 2018 laws, follows earlier prosecutions of Di Sanh Duong and Alexander Csergo., MISSING MEDIA/FILES: The_case_is_one_of_the_first_under_the_nation_s_current_foreign_interference_regime_where_an_alleged_spy_has_been_accused_of_targeting_a_community_group_rather_than_a_government_or_a_company.jpg, Australian_Federal_Police_Assistant_Commissioner_Stephen_Nutt.jpg

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109483

>>109486

Alleged Chinese spy ran business in heart of Canberra society

NOAH YIM and RICHARD FERGUSON - August 07, 2025

A woman who is alleged to have spied on a Buddhist sect in Australia for Beijing’s security bureau is a business woman who has been ­operating in the heart of Canberra society.

The alleged spy has owned a number of businesses across NSW and the ACT, and was previously involved in a bankruptcy case.

The permanent Australian resident, who cannot be identified for legal reasons, faced Canberra Magistrates Court earlier this week on one count of reckless foreign interference.

She is alleged to have been instructed by China’s Public Security Bureau to “covertly gather information” on Canberra’s Guan Yin Citta Buddhist association, based near the Australian National University. But The Australian can now reveal that she has been involved in a popular Canberra business and potentially had access to many politicians, political staffers and journalists through her work.

Australian Federal Police Assistant Commissioner Stephen Nutt said more arrests were expected to be made in relation to the case, after electronic devices were seized in search warrants on multiple Canberra addresses.

The case is one of the first under the nation’s current foreign interference regime where an alleged spy has been accused of targeting a community group rather than a government or a company.

Guan Yin Citta has clandestine centres in mainland China, as well as associations in the US, Singapore, Malaysia and Taiwan.

China’s security services have reportedly sought to eradicate the movement, which was founded by Shanghai-born Sydney man Lu Junhong, who died in 2021 aged 62.

But revelations about the woman’s business will raise fears that she may have been in close proximity to MPs, bureaucrats and others having sensitive conversations.

The Australian can also reveal the woman moved to Australia as a teenager.

The woman, whose identity was suppressed by the court, was arrested on Saturday. If found guilty, she faces a maximum of 15 years in jail.

She was arrested as part of ­Operation Autumn Shield, which was launched in March after information from ASIO.

It is the third time a charge has been laid under the commonwealth’s 2018 foreign interference laws. The first involves Vietnamese-Chinese community leader Di Sanh Duong, accused of courting former multicultural affairs minister Alan Tudge on behalf of the Chinese Communist Party.

The second involves businessman Alexander Csergo, accused of compiling reports for China on Australian defence, economic and national security arrangements.

The Albanese government has ­refused to say whether it will raise with Beijing the woman’s case, after a court agreed to the defendant’s ­request to keep her identity secret.

While Foreign Minister Penny Wong has previously raised concerns over Chinese operatives seeking to exert influence abroad, The Australian understands no warning was given to the Chinese government before the Australian Federal Police made its allegations public on Monday.

When asked if she had spoken to Beijing counterparts about the revelations a Chinese national was being accused of covert information gathering, Senator Wong would not comment.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/alleged-chinese-spy-ran-business-in-heart-of-canberra-society/news-story/6ac15c4be2e5e70a8dbbb97e6d35b79f

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109515

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23444504 (091353ZAUG25) Notable: Virginia Giuffre's family says "it would be a travesty" if Ghislaine Maxwell gets a pardon – Virginia Giuffre’s family has condemned the idea that President Trump could pardon Ghislaine Maxwell, calling it “a travesty” and “a slap in the face” to survivors. Giuffre’s sister-in-law Amanda Roberts said survivors are saying “no to leniency. No to a pardon.” Her brother Sky Roberts insisted “the survivors… should have a platform.” Maxwell, serving 20 years for sex trafficking, has offered to testify before Congress if pardoned. Amanda Roberts said Maxwell “needs to be behind bars” and described her as an “active participant and a ringleader.”, MISSING MEDIA/FILES: Virginia_Giuffre_s_family_says_it_would_be_a_travesty_if_Ghislaine_Maxwell_gets_a_pardon.mp4

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109289

>>109472

>>109473

>>109474

Virginia Giuffre's family says "it would be a travesty" if Ghislaine Maxwell gets a pardon

Kelsie Hoffman - August 6, 2025

The family of Virginia Giuffre, who was a vocal accuser of convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein and his associate Ghislaine Maxwell, have been speaking publicly about Giuffre's legacy, Maxwell's request for clemency and the Epstein files.

Giuffre, who claimed Epstein and Maxwell began abusing her when she was 16 years old, died by suicide in April. Now, her sister-in-law Amanda Roberts is calling for transparency in the Epstein case and speaking out against the possibility that President Trump could grant Maxwell a pardon.

"People need to see the real truth and the humans that were actually affected by this … those are the testimonies that need to come to the forefront and come to light," she said in an interview Wednesday with "CBS Mornings" co-host Gayle King. "It would be a travesty, it makes me sick, it makes survivors sick, it's a slap in the face, the idea that she (Maxwell) could potentially get a pardon. Survivors are saying no, no to leniency. No to a pardon. Will you silence them again?"

Maxwell would be willing to testify before Congress about Epstein — whose death in jail in 2019 was ruled a suicide — if Mr. Trump pardoned her or commuted her sentence, according to a letter from her attorney that was recently obtained by CBS News. Mr. Trump said late last month that he hadn't thought about pardoning her, but that he was "allowed to do it."

"For me I think it's, why are we listening to a known perjurer?" said Giuffre's brother, Sky Roberts, referring to Maxwell. "I mean, I think if anybody needs to be heard it's the survivors. They should have a voice. They should have a platform to be able to stand on. I think we need to be listening to the other side of things, which is the survivors and their voices, help elevate those."

Maxwell was sentenced in 2022 to 20 years in prison for child sex trafficking and other crimes linked to Epstein. Giuffre's accusations were not part of the case that led to Maxwell's conviction, which Maxwell is currently appealing.

Giuffre told CBS News in 2020 that she believed Maxwell was the mastermind behind the pair's crimes.

"In conversations with Virginia, she really described Ghislaine as almost this puppet master, that she kind of was the brains behind recruiting the girls and really used her womanhood to build that trust and lure these girls in," Amanda Roberts said.

Maxwell "was an active participant in the abuse – the physical and destructive abuse," Amanda Roberts said. "She was an active participant and a ringleader in this."

Amanda Roberts said she feels that the survivors are being forgotten and added that she and Sky Roberts would be willing to speak with the Trump administration or law enforcement officials regarding the Epstein case.

"I think we would be the first ones to show up and give our sister's testimony and remind people why she (Maxwell) needs to be behind jails and the correct facility," she said.

Maxwell was recently transferred from a federal correctional facility in Florida to a facility in Texas. According to the Federal Bureau of Prisons, the facility in Bryan, Texas, is considered minimum security.

"The punishment should fit the crime and right now, where she currently is, does not fit the crime," Amanda Roberts said.

As for Giuffre, Sky Roberts wants her to be remembered for her powerful voice, saying, "she was also a mom. She was a sister. She was you know … a friend, a daughter and so I think … she would want survivors to still be able to build off that platform which is why we're coming forward because she can't speak for herself now."

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/virginia-giuffre-family-ghislaine-maxwell-pardon/

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109516

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23448157 (100910ZAUG25) Notable: Video: ‘No tears for Virginia Giuffre’: Ghislaine Maxwell's brother brands Epstein accuser a 'monster' who 'ruined lives – Ghislaine Maxwell’s brother Ian has branded Virginia Giuffre a “monster” and said he shed “no tears” after her death, claiming she “ruined the lives” of his sister and Prince Andrew. Speaking to LBC’s Nick Ferrari, he maintained Maxwell’s innocence despite her 2022 conviction, accusing Giuffre of being a “consummate liar” and noting she was not called to testify at Maxwell’s trial. Ian Maxwell backed the release of the so-called Epstein files, arguing “transparency is the friend of my sister,” and said there was a “good chance” of her release on appeal.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109289

>>109472

>>109474

>>109515

'No tears for Virginia Giuffre’: Ghislaine Maxwell's brother brands Epstein accuser a 'monster' who 'ruined lives'

Henry Moore - 1 August 2025

The brother of convicted sex offender Ghislaine Maxwell has defended his sister, branding her primary accuser, Virginia Giuffre, a “monster” and saying he “shed no tears” after her death.

Speaking to LBC’s Nick Ferrari, Ian Maxwell claimed his sister was innocent, accusing Ms Giuffre of “ruining the lives” of both her and Prince Andrew.

Virginia Giuffre, perhaps the most high-profile victim of Jeffrey Epstein’s abuse, died at her farm in Neergabby, Australia, earlier this year.

Mr Maxwell’s comments come as Donald Trump faces increasing pressure to release the so-called “Epstein files”, a list allegedly revealing who collaborated with infamous sex offender, and Ghislaine Maxwell’s long-term boyfriend, Jeffrey Epstein.

President Trump has so far resisted calls to release the files, but has hinted he could pardon Ms Maxwell if she aided in exposing others who helped Epstein.

Calling for the files to be released, Ian Maxwell said: “I believe that transparency is generally the right way to go, and I believe transparency is the friend of my sister.

“So I do think that to the extent some of these files or whatever they amount to can be released, that's a good thing.”

“My sister's been banged up for five years. It is very, very largely due to the actions, lies of this woman who has destroyed my sister's life and other lives with her lives, including that of Prince Andrew and other young women whom she recruited for Epstein. I shed no tear for Virginia Giuffre.”

Mr Maxwell maintains his sister is completely innocent, despite her being found guilty of luring women into Epstein’s sex-trafficking ring during their time together.

Hitting out at Virginia Giuffre, one of Epstein’s primary accusers who passed away earlier this year, Mr Maxwell said: “I think I know who the monster is here. It certainly isn't my sister.

“Virginia Giuffre was a consummate liar from start to finish. And this is most conspicuously revealed when she had alleged that she had slept with Professor Alan Dershowitz, maintained it for many years and then had to withdraw and desist.

“That's the first major point and perhaps the second crucial point is that the law enforcement elected not to call Virginia Giuffre to the trial of my sister, the most voluble, perhaps best known of her accusers.

“And why was that? Because she would have been eviscerated by the defence. So that's My take on her.”

On the condition of his sister, he added: “Well, she's now completed five years of prison, two years of that pretrial in absolutely torturous circumstances.”

Opening up about his relationship with Epstein, Mr Maxwell said: “I thought he was a highly intelligent man. He had a sort of dark charisma about him.

“He was a very aggressive listener. You felt that he was taking things from you, taking information from you. I didn't warm to him, I have to say.

“He's not the kind of person I would have wanted to go for a drink with, if you see what I mean.

“But this was a relatively short time, maybe an hour or two, something like 25 years ago.”

Mr Maxwell added there is a “good chance” his sister could be released from prison in the wake of her upcoming appeal to the Supreme Court.

https://www.lbc.co.uk/news/exclusive/ghislaine-maxwell-brother-virginia-giuffre-epstein/

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=epLV5ptJLPA

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109517

File: 06a4658ef75e6fd⋯.jpg (226.76 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23448169 (100918ZAUG25) Notable: Jewish leaders demand Albanese makes sure Palestinian Authority accepts Israel before recognition – Jewish leaders have urged Anthony Albanese to ensure the Palestinian Authority recognises Israel as a Jewish state, ends support for terrorism and halts anti-Semitic indoctrination before Australia considers Palestinian statehood. Labor ministers outlined a path for recognition, with Penny Wong signing a joint call for the PA to play a “central role” and Tony Burke noting precedent for recognition despite terrorist control in parts of territory. US Secretary of State Marco Rubio warned European recognition efforts undermined ceasefire talks, while Jewish organisations in Australia questioned Mahmoud Abbas’s credibility., MISSING MEDIA/FILES: Palestinian_Authority_President_Mahmoud_Abbas.jpg, US_Secretary_of_State_Marco_Rubio.jpg, Co_chief_executive_officer_of_the_Executive_Council_of_Australian_Jewry_Alex_Ryvchin.jpg

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109251

>>109484

>>109503

>>109511

Jewish leaders demand Albanese makes sure Palestinian Authority accepts Israel before recognition

RICHARD FERGUSON - 10 August 2025

1/2

Jewish leaders are demanding Anthony Albanese ensure the Palestinian Authority agrees to support a Jewish state in Israel, stop funding terrorism, and end the anti-Semitic indoctrination of schoolchildren before he recognises it as the official government of a new Arab state.

Labor ministers over the weekend laid out a path for the Prime Minister to recognise a Palestinian state led by West Bank chief Mahmoud Abbas, who will speak to the Prime Minister in New York next month.

Foreign Minister Penny Wong signed a joint statement with Britain, Italy, Germany and New Zealand calling for Israel to abandon plans to occupy Gaza City, the demilitarisation of Hamas, and for the PA to play a “central role” in a Palestinian state.

Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke suggested on Sunday Labor could go forward with Palestinian recognition even if Hamas are still in charge of the Gaza Strip, saying Australia has recognised governments before when parts of their lands were occupied by terrorists.

“There have frequently been countries where part of that nation has been occupied by a terrorist group and we haven’t ceased to recognise the country,” Mr Burke told Sky News.

“Both Syria and Iraq had long periods where parts of those countries were being occupied and realistically controlled by ISIS. It didn’t stop us from recognising and having diplomatic relations with those countries themselves. So, you know, there’s a fair bit of precedent on this.”

But there are concerns about Australia legitimising the Palestinian Authority as the alternative to Hamas, considering its decades-long opposition to the Jewish State’s existence.

And US Secretary of State Marco Rubio has said the European movement to recognise Palestine at the United Nations – which Labor may yet follow – was directly responsible for the collapse earlier this month of White House-led ceasefire talks.

“Talks with Hamas fell apart on the day (French President Emanuel) Macron made the unilateral decision that he’s going to recognise the Palestinian state,” Mr Rubio told an American Catholic television station. “And then you have other people come forward. Other countries say, ‘well, if there is not a ceasefire by September, we’re going to recognise a Palestinian state’. If I’m Hamas, I’d basically conclude let’s not do a ceasefire, we can be rewarded, we can claim it as a victory.”

Executive Council of Australian Jewry co-chief executive Alex Ryvchin has said Mr Albanese needs to lay out now how he would recognise Palestine, and tell the nation how he would ensure Mr Abbas would not continue to be a threat to Israel.

“We expect that in exchange for any recognition of an Arab Palestinian state, our government will demand that Mahmoud Abbas … declare his desire to live in peace alongside the Jewish state of Israel,” Mr Ryvchin said.

“Imposing a Palestinian state rather than supporting its creation through a peace process may be imminent, but it represents a massive break from nearly 80 years of Australian policy.”

Mr Abbas, 89, has led the PA since 2005, when he took over following the death of Yasser Arafat.

His 20-year rule has seen the PA lose control of Gaza to Hamas, accusations of corruption and repeated outbursts of division.

Mr Abbas has called Hamas “dogs” and demanded the release of hostages, but there are also questions about his long-term commitment to peace with Israel.

The PA only in February ended a “martyrs fund” that gave money to families of Palestinians who died as a result of violent incidents with Israelis.

Australia/Israel & Jewish Affairs Council executive director Colin Rubenstein said “the corrupt Palestinian Authority dictatorship continues to promise reforms but repeatedly fails to deliver meaningful change or to genuinely confront terrorism”.

“That makes any premature recognition or legitimisation both misguided and counter-productive to advancing the negotiated two-state outcome,” he said.

Zionist Federation chief executive Alon Cassuto said the PA’s poor support among Palestinians would hamper its ability to be a partner in peace for Israelis.

“The last time they had a presence in Gaza, it ended in a violent civil war with Hamas, where PA officials were thrown off buildings and chased out,” he said. “This is not a strong foundation for success for a future Palestinian state.”

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/jewish-leaders-demand-albanese-makes-sure-palestinian-authority-accepts-israel-before-recognition/news-story/5eb048a574dfc39a362f7ce062be5f77

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109518

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23448206 (100941ZAUG25) Notable: Shattering the silence - Surviving Malka Leifer to stream internationally – A new documentary, Surviving Malka Leifer, follows the decades-long fight by sisters Dassi Erlich, Nicole Meyer and Elly Sapper to bring their abuser, Malka Leifer, to justice. Filmmaker Adam Kamien said the project was made foremost for the sisters, who feel the film honours their story. It traces their campaign to extradite Leifer, her 2023 conviction for multiple sexual offences, and the toll of years of court battles. The film, premiering at the Melbourne International Film Festival before streaming on Stan, also aims to break the culture of silence in closed communities., MISSING MEDIA/FILES: Dassi_Erlich_Nicole_Meyer_and_Elly_Sapper_spent_years_trying_to_bring_their_abuser_Malka_Leifer_to_justice_A_new_film_documents_their_journey.jpg, Malka_Leifer_being_brought_to_a_Jerusalem_courtroom_in_2018.jpg, From_left_Nicole_Meyer_Elly_Sapper_and_Dassi_Erlich_leave_the_Victorian_County_Court_after_Malka_Leifer_was_sentenced_to_15_years_in_jail.jpg

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Shattering the silence - Surviving Malka Leifer to stream internationally

Dassi Erlich, Nicole Meyer and Elly Sapper spent years trying to bring their abuser, Malka Leifer, to justice. A new film documents their journey. Jessica Abelsohn spoke to filmmaker Adam Kamien about Surviving Malka Leifer.

JESSICA ABELSOHN - 4 August 2025

1/2

For documentary filmmaker Adam Kamien, there was a very select audience he had in mind when filming Surviving Malka Leifer – Dassi Erlich, Nicole Meyer and Elly Sapper.

As long as these three women felt the film had done their story justice, public perception always came second. And, as Kamien told The AJN, they do indeed feel proud of the finished product.

As many readers would know, Erlich, Meyer and Sapper lifted the lid on abuse by Malka Leifer, the principal of the Adass Israel School in Melbourne. They bravely came forward, not only to pursue justice for themselves but also to speak to the issue more broadly – ensuring sexual abuse survivors know they are not alone and encouraging them to come forward if and when they feel comfortable.

The case against Malka Leifer was broken by this very masthead, when Kamien was employed as a journalist. He has followed the story from the very beginning.

“I just remember the newsroom being abuzz,” he recalled. “As a weekly paper, it can be hard to keep hold of a story by the time we go to press on a Wednesday. Often, these things have already made the rounds. But this was a story that we broke – Ashley [Brown] and Naomi [Levin] broke – and then all of a sudden, everyone wanted to talk to us. It was a big deal.”

Kamien told The AJN that despite getting his start in print journalism, he always wanted to be in film.

“I never really did the fireman, astronaut thing. I always wanted to be in the film industry,” he said, explaining that the skills in journalism and documentary filmmaking are transferable, so everything he learned while in print, he could use in his filmmaking career.

He went on to explain that the Malka Leifer case was particularly relevant and important to him.

Kamien covered a few of the child sexual abuse scandals while he worked for The AJN, including the Manny Waks allegations against Yeshiva Centre in Melbourne and the Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse. He explained that given his history with covering these kinds of cases, the Malka Leifer allegations always interested him. And, of course, his quest for justice.

“Social justice has always been important to me, and having seen Manny Waks go through what he went through, sort of speaking out very publicly, and all of the difficulties that came with that, the story of Dassi, Elly and Nicole really spoke to me, because, particularly in a closed community like Adass, speaking out comes with some pretty serious ramifications,” Kamien said. “They chose to do that. And not just for themselves, but to speak to the issue more broadly, and obviously to try to pursue justice themselves. It occurred to me that if they were willing to sacrifice that, then someone had to amplify that message.”

Kamien acknowledged that the women were doing a pretty good job themselves of amplifying the message, but he knew he could help by providing another level of exposure. Surviving Malka Leifer will have its premiere at the Melbourne International Film Festival before moving onto Stan for streaming, which Kamien said allows for a really wide audience.

While Kamien also recognised and appreciated the written information that has been produced about the Malka Leifer case, he said there’s another layer that can be added by using film.

“I think it’s a much more personal medium. And while I’ve been concerned with getting this story out there and amplifying that message as I said before, I think the other thing that documentary allows you to do, maybe better than you can in print or other mediums, is convey a sense of who a person is. And I really hope that people get that sense of who Dassi, Elly and Nicole are, because they’re not defined solely by this incredible thing that they did,” he said.

“And I hope people get to see them a little bit in the way that I’ve been able to … there’s obviously a lot of difficult subject matter. But to me, that’s one of the hopeful things in the film – it’s the people that they are, despite all of this, because of it, who knows? So I hope that resonates with people.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109519

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23448301 (101010ZAUG25) Notable: Torture and murder accused to be re-arrested – Papua New Guinea Police Commissioner David Manning has ordered the re-arrest of eight men accused of torturing and murdering a woman in Hela Province after their release by a court. He said police would exercise their authority to charge the suspects, stressing that evidence from video footage must be backed by witness statements for successful prosecution. Manning condemned villagers for hiding other suspects, warning that anyone obstructing investigations would be treated as co-offenders. He appealed to community leaders to support police, declaring the crime “absolutely disgusting” and depraved., MISSING MEDIA/FILES: Manning_calls_on_community_to_stop_hiding_suspects.jpg

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>>/qresearch/23448266

Torture and murder accused to be re-arrested

Manning calls on community to stop hiding suspects

POSTCOURIERONLINE - JULY 31, 2025

The Commissioner of Police, David Manning, has issued instructions that eight suspects accused of the torture and murder of a woman in Magarima district in Hela Province, be re-arrested and face prosecution.

The Commissioner’s directions follow a recent Court order, releasing the eight suspects from police custody.

“While I respect the court ruling that saw the men released, in this instance Police will exercise their authority at law to re-arrest and charge the accused responsible for this disgraceful offending.

“The eight arrested were held while they were being processed and charges being formalised.”

This is a complex case and despite video footage circulated on social media, witness statements and corroborative investigations must be conducted to ensure that arrests result in successful prosecutions.

Commissioner Manning said police were also facing opposition from the community of the victim who were hiding other suspects.

“This is an absolutely disgusting crime and now friends and fellow villagers are trying to hide the men who tortured and then murdered this woman,” Commissioner Manning said.

“This level of depravity sickens me. Anyone hiding these animals or obstructing police investigations will be subject to arrest.”

Commissioner Manning highlighted the challenges in investigating offences without the support of communities.

“It is sad to see the communities of Magarima district fail to support police investigations into this matter. I make a final call for the community leaders in the village where the victim came from to give up the additional suspects, provide statements, and support police investigations.

“The woman they tortured and killed was your daughter, and anyone who hides these animals will be treated as a co-offender, arrested, and face serious prison time.”

https://www.postcourier.com.pg/torture-and-murder-accused-to-be-re-arrested0/

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109520

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23452518 (111024ZAUG25) Notable: Historic decision:Albanese to recognise Palestinian state at UN in September– (Video) Anthony Albanese has announced Australia will formally recognise a Palestinian state at next month’s UN General Assembly, aligning with Britain, France and Canada. He said recognition followed commitments from Mahmoud Abbas that Hamas would have no role, while condemning Israel’s actions in Gaza and settlement expansion. Israel’s ambassador Amir Maimon and Jewish leaders warned the move undermines security and peace talks, as Benjamin Netanyahu branded it “shameful.” Penny Wong confirmed she briefed US Secretary of State Marco Rubio, with Washington’s response likely to add strain to relations with Donald Trump’s administration.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109251

>>109484

>>109503

>>109517

Albanese to recognise Palestinian state at UN in September

BEN PACKHAM - 11 August 2025

1/2

Australia will formally recognise a Palestinian state at the UN General Assembly next month, in a landmark policy shift that will further test his government’s relationship with the Trump administration.

The Prime Minister announced the move after a cabinet meeting in Canberra, aligning Australia with Britain, France and Canada, which have made similar commitments in recent weeks.

“Australia will recognise the right of the Palestinian people to a state of their own, predicated on the committed amendments Australia has received from the Palestinian Authority,” Mr Albanese said.

“Our government has made it clear that there can be no role for the terrorists of Hamas in any future Palestinian state. This is one of the commitments Australia has sought and received from President (Mahmoud) Abbas and the Palestinian Authority.”

Israel’s top diplomat in Australia Amir Maimon immediately condemned the decision, saying it “undermines Israel’s security, derails hostage negotiations, and hands a victory to those who oppose coexistence”.

“Peace is built by ending terror, not rewarding it. By recognising a Palestinian state while Hamas continues to kill, kidnap, and reject peace, Australia undermines Israel’s security, derails hostage negotiations, and hands a victory to those who oppose coexistence,” Mr Maimon said in a statement.

The nation’s peak Jewish group also reacted furiously to the announcement, accusing Labor of bolstering Hamas’s position and abandoning decades of bipartisanship on Israel.

“It leaves Hamas armed and in control of territory, and in a position to regroup and rearm, thereby creating the conditions for the next war rather than a comprehensive peace,” Executive Council of Australian Jewry president Daniel Aghion said.

“Australia is now committed to recognising as a state an entity with no agreed borders, no single government in effective control of its territory, and no demonstrated capacity to live in peace with its neighbours.”

The announcement came after the Prime Minister told the ABC’s Insiders program a fortnight ago that his government didn’t want recognition to be a “gesture”.

He reassured the Jewish leaders in a private meeting days later that Australian recognition of Palestine was “not imminent”.

Speaking on Monday, Mr Albanese denied recognition of Palestine was a symbolic one.

“This is a practical contribution towards building momentum. This is not Australia acting alone,” Mr Albanese said.

He said the decision was made as part of a “co-ordinated global effort”, which he had discussed with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu during a phone call last Thursday.

He said Israel was responsible for “the human catastrophe in Gaza”, and was placing a two-state solution at risk by its illegal settlements and threats to annex the occupied territories.

“A two-state solution is humanity’s best hope to break the cycle of violence in the Middle East and to bring an end to the conflict, suffering and starvation in Gaza,” Mr Albanese said.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109521

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23452542 (111039ZAUG25) Notable: Video: Netanyahu lashes ‘shameful’ Australia over Palestinian state – Benjamin Netanyahu has denounced Australia’s plan to recognise Palestinian statehood as “shameful,” insisting it will not bring peace but “the next war.” At a press conference, the Israeli Prime Minister defended Israel’s expanded offensive in Gaza, revealing cabinet approval to dismantle Hamas strongholds beyond Gaza City into central refugee camps. He rejected accusations of genocide and starvation, saying if Israel intended such actions “it would have taken exactly one afternoon.” Netanyahu argued Hamas already used Gaza as a “terror state” and warned Palestinian statehood in the West Bank would allow radicals and Iran to exploit it.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109251

>>109520

Netanyahu lashes ‘shameful’ Australia over Palestinian state

STAFF WRITERS & AP - 11 August 2025

1/2

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has lashed out at “shameful” Australia for preparing to recognise Palestinian statehood, as he defended a sweeping military offensive in Gaza.

Revealing plans to broaden the Israeli military’s Gaza plan to include dismantling Hamas in the Strip’s central refugee camps in addition to Gaza City, Mr Netanyahu told reporters: “Those who say that Israel has a right to defend itself are also saying, ‘But don’t exercise that right.’

“I think we’re actually applying force judiciously, and they know it. They know what they would do if right next to Melbourne, or right next to Sydney, you had this horrific attack. I think you would do at least what we’re doing … [although] maybe not as efficiently and as precisely as we’re doing it.”

Mr Netanyahu said Israel adamantly opposed an independent Palestine “for the simple reason that they know it won’t bring peace, it will bring war. To have European countries and Australia march into that rabbit hole … and buy this canard, it is disappointing. And I think it’s actually shameful.”

On Saturday, Australia joined the UK, France, Canada and other allies condemning Israel’s military action in Gaza and over the weekend Anthony Albanese and New Zealand Prime Minister Christopher Luxon jointly called for an immediate ceasefire in the enclave.

But Mr Netanyahu said Hamas had a de facto state in Gaza, which the militants used “to launch a war of terror against Israel,” and would do so again if it could.

Mr Netanyahu said Israel “has no choice but to finish the job and complete the defeat of Hamas,” as he revealed for the first time that his security cabinet last week instructed the dismantling of Hamas strongholds not only in Gaza City but also in the “central camps” of Muwasi.

The crowded camps had not been part of Israel's announcement on Friday of the offensive. It was not clear why, a; though Mr Netanyahu has faced criticism within his ruling coalition that targeting Gaza City was not enough.

Giving the Palestinians a state wouldn’t see them abandoning the “goal of destroying the Jewish state,” he said. “All you’re doing is you’re bringing the next war closer.”

“Again, Hamas had a state. It just brought the war closer. If you did the same thing in Judea and Samaria (Israel’s name for the West Bank), right above Tel Aviv, enveloping Jerusalem, some say cutting Jerusalem into two … you’re going to have the radicals again take it over, Iran take it over, and start a war from improved boundaries.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109522

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23452557 (111053ZAUG25) Notable: Australia will recognise a Palestinian state. But what does that actually mean? – Australia will join Britain, France and Canada in recognising a Palestinian state at the UN General Assembly in September, a largely symbolic act that grants Palestine expanded diplomatic status but no immediate change on the ground. Palestine remains a non-member observer state with divided governance between the Palestinian Authority and Hamas, disputed borders and extensive Israeli settlements. Anthony Albanese said recognition followed commitments from Mahmoud Abbas to exclude Hamas and pursue elections. Experts stressed UN membership remains unlikely due to a probable US veto, though recognition strengthens Palestine’s claim to self-determination., MISSING MEDIA/FILES: Prime_Minister_Anthony_Albanese_and_Foreign_Minister_Penny_Wong_announce_Australia_s_plan_to_recognise_a_State_of_Palestine.jpg, Pro_Palestine_protesters_outside_Parliament_House_in_Canberra_on_the_first_day_of_the_new_parliament_last_month.jpg, Gaza_and_the_West_Bank_form_modern_day_Palestine_officially_referred_to_by_the_Australian_government_as_the_Occupied_Palestinian_Territories.jpg

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109251

>>109520

>>109521

Australia will recognise a Palestinian state. But what does that actually mean?

Brittany Busch - August 11, 2025

1/2

Australia has become the latest in a string of nations to vow it will recognise a Palestinian state at the United Nations General Assembly in September.

A two-state solution in the Middle East has been debated for decades, but many countries have held back from recognising Palestine to avoid making a purely symbolic move and to encourage a lasting peace agreement with Israel.

However, international opinion has shifted rapidly in recent weeks amid reports of hunger in Gaza, an Israeli plan to send mass ground troops to more of the territory, and a breakdown in ceasefire talks to end the conflict that began with Hamas’ massacres in Israel on October 7, 2023.

France last month became the first of the G7 group of wealthy nations to declare it would recognise a Palestinian state, which led to several following suit, including the UK and Canada at the end of July. On Monday, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese announced Australia would also follow suit.

But what does recognition actually look like? Would it make a practical difference? And what status does Palestine have right now?

What does Australian recognition of Palestinian statehood mean?

A Palestinian state would be considered equal to other nations in Australia’s eyes and would have expanded diplomatic representation. That means it would be able to have an embassy in Canberra and an ambassador, rather than a representative of a general delegation.

The move is largely symbolic because the proposed Palestinian state does not have settled borders, and Israel has forces in many parts of the West Bank and Gaza – the territories where Palestinians have long aimed to establish a state.

Statehood would be unlikely to have an immediate effect for people in Gaza or on Israel’s war with Hamas, but it could help influence conversations about the future of the Middle East.

Albanese said on Monday that a two-state solution was “humanity’s best hope to break the cycle of violence in the Middle East, and to bring an end to the conflict, suffering and starvation in Gaza”.

What is Palestine’s current status?

Gaza and the West Bank form modern-day Palestine, officially referred to by the Australian government as the Occupied Palestinian Territories. It has no unified government, standing army or settled borders.

Professor Ben Saul, chair of international law at the University of Sydney, said Palestine met most of the requirements to be legally considered a state, including having a permanent population and the ability to enter into international relations, but it did not have an effective, independent government. He said that because of its disputed status, other countries’ recognition carried more power in supporting Palestinians’ right to self-determination.

Almost 150 of the 193 UN member states recognise Palestine as a state, including many developing countries.

Militant group Hamas, designated a terrorist organisation by countries including Australia, has run the Gaza Strip for almost 20 years.

The Palestinian Authority, through which Australia officially engages with Palestine, has limited autonomy in the West Bank. The Oslo Accords in the 1990s gave the authority direct control of about 20 per cent of the territory.

There are numerous Israeli settlements across the West Bank, and these have been expanding. Israel retains control of security in much of the West Bank. According to the CIA, about 468,300 Israeli settlers lived in the West Bank in 2022. The agency estimated that as of 2021, 236,600 Israelis lived in East Jerusalem, which Israel annexed in 1980.

Australia and most countries officially oppose the settlements on the basis they are illegal under international law. Israel disputes the illegality of the settlements.

The Palestinian Authority, which was formed in the 1990s as a result of the Oslo Accords, is the territory’s representative at the UN, where it is a non-member observer state and has no vote in the 193-member General Assembly.

What will happen at the United Nations General Assembly session in September?

Australia has joined France, the UK, and Canada in saying it will separately recognise a Palestinian state and use the 80th session of the UN General Assembly, which opens September 9, as the stage for that move.

Professor Saul said the announcement at the UN was a political move rather than a legal one, but the choice of location was important.

“Recognition is just the political act. You could do it by press release … it’s just that doing it in a high-level, multilateral forum like [the UN] is absolutely designed to have a much greater impact politically,” he said.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109523

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23456893 (120854ZAUG25) Notable: Video: Australia's Albanese says Netanyahu 'in denial' over suffering in Gaza – Anthony Albanese has accused Benjamin Netanyahu of being “in denial” about the humanitarian crisis in Gaza, citing a phone call in which the Israeli leader dismissed concerns over civilian suffering. The rebuke came a day after Albanese announced Australia will recognise a Palestinian state at the UN General Assembly, aligning with France, Britain and Canada. He said Netanyahu’s refusal to heed allies contributed to the decision, which is conditional on the Palestinian Authority excluding Hamas. Opposition leader Sussan Ley warned the move risks straining ties with Washington, as public sentiment in Australia shifts.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109251

>>109520

>>109521

Australia's Albanese says Netanyahu 'in denial' over suffering in Gaza

Alasdair Pal - August 12, 2025

SYDNEY, Aug 12 (Reuters) - Australia Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said on Tuesday his Israeli counterpart Benjamin Netanyahu was "in denial" about the humanitarian situation in Gaza, a day after announcing Australia would recognise a Palestinian state for the first time.

Australia will recognise a Palestinian state at next month's United Nations General Assembly, Albanese said on Monday, a move that adds to international pressure on Israel after similar announcements from France, Britain and Canada.

Albanese said on Tuesday the Netanyahu government's reluctance to listen to its allies contributed to Australia's decision to recognise a Palestinian state.

"He again reiterated to me what he has said publicly as well, which is to be in denial about the consequences that are occurring for innocent people," Albanese said in an interview with state broadcaster ABC, recounting a Thursday phone call with Netanyahu discussing the issue.

Australia's decision to recognise a Palestinian state is conditional on commitments received from the Palestinian Authority, including that Islamist militant group Hamas would have no involvement in any future state.

Right-leaning opposition leader Sussan Ley said the move, which breaks with long-held bipartisan policy over Israel and the Palestinian territories, risked jeopardising Australia's relationship with the United States.

SENTIMENT SHIFT

Albanese said as little as two weeks ago he would not be drawn on a timeline for recognition of a Palestinian state.

His incumbent centre-left Labor Party, which won an increased majority at a general election in May, has previously been wary of dividing public opinion in Australia, which has significant Jewish and Muslim minorities.

But the public mood has shifted sharply after Israel said it planned to take military control of Gaza, amid increasing reports of hunger and malnutrition amongst its people.

Tens of thousands of demonstrators marched across Sydney's Harbour Bridge this month calling for aid deliveries in Gaza as the humanitarian crisis worsened.

"This decision is driven by popular sentiment in Australia which has shifted in recent months, with a majority of Australians wanting to see an imminent end to the humanitarian crisis in Gaza," said Jessica Genauer, a senior lecturer in international relations at Flinders University.

Opposition leader Ley said the decision was "disrespectful" of key ally the United States, which opposes Palestinian statehood.

"We would never have taken this step because this is completely against what our principles are, which is that recognition, the two state solution, comes at the end of the peace process, not before," she said in an interview with radio station 2GB.

Neighbouring New Zealand has said it is still considering whether to recognise a Palestinian state, a decision that drew sharp criticism from former prime minister Helen Clark on Tuesday.

"This is a catastrophic situation, and here we are in New Zealand somehow arguing some fine point about whether we should recognise we need to be adding our voice to the need for this catastrophe to stop," she said in an interview with state broadcaster RNZ.

"This is not the New Zealand I've known."

https://www.reuters.com/world/asia-pacific/australias-albanese-says-netanyahu-in-denial-over-suffering-gaza-2025-08-12/

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0PXZZPlyO3o

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109524

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23456896 (120859ZAUG25) Notable: Coalition vows to revoke Australia's recognition of a Palestinian state – Opposition Leader Sussan Ley has pledged a future Coalition government would overturn Anthony Albanese’s decision to recognise a Palestinian state at the UN, insisting recognition should only follow a peace process. She accused Labor of disrespecting the US and warned recognition was premature while Hamas holds hostages. Albanese said Netanyahu’s “denial” of Gaza’s humanitarian toll influenced his stance, describing Australia’s move as part of a coordinated global push with France, the UK and Canada. Michaelia Cash questioned the feasibility of recognising an entity with no borders or unified government, calling it meaningless., MISSING MEDIA/FILES: Sussan_Ley_has_vowed_to_reverse_Labor_s_plan_to_recognise_Palestinian_statehood.jpg, Anthony_Albanese_said_frustration_with_the_Israeli_government_had_contributed_to_his_decision_to_move_on_Palestinian_recognition.jpg, Israeli_Prime_Minister_Benjamin_Netanyahu_strongly_rebuked_Australia_s_plans_to_recognise_a_Palestinian_state.jpg

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109251

>>109520

>>109521

Coalition vows to revoke Australia's recognition of a Palestinian state

Maani Truu - 12 August 2025

The Coalition has vowed to revoke recognition of a Palestinian state if elected in three years, as Prime Minister Anthony Albanese strengthened his criticism of Israel's leader, labelling him "in denial" about the consequences of the war in Gaza.

Opposition Leader Sussan Ley made the pledge in a statement a day after Labor's much-anticipated announcement that Australia would recognise a Palestinian state at the upcoming United Nations meeting in September.

The statement also reiterated the opposition's position that Palestinian recognition should only come at the end of a "proper peace process".

"The Coalition would have never made this call and we do not agree with it," read the statement, which was released shortly after Ms Ley held a media conference where she did not confirm her party's position on whether recognition would be revoked.

Earlier on Tuesday the prime minister said frustration with the Israeli government had contributed to his government's decision to make the move to recognise Palestinian statehood after more than seven decades.

In a call with Mr Netanyahu on Thursday, during which Mr Albanese discussed Australia's plans to follow in the footsteps of France, the United Kingdom and Canada in recognising Palestinian statehood, he said his counterpart had made the same argument as a year earlier.

"That if we just have more military action in Gaza, somehow that will produce a different outcome," Mr Albanese said.

"He again reiterated to me what he has said publicly as well, which is to be in denial about the consequences that are occurring for innocent people."

The Israeli prime minister has been scathing of the handful of Western countries' pledges to recognise a Palestinian state. In comments made before Mr Albanese publicly revealed his plans, Mr Netanyahu name checked Australia, calling the move "shameful".

"To have European countries and Australia march into that rabbit hole, just like that, fall right into it and buy this canard is disappointing, and I think it's actually shameful," he said in a rare media conference for foreign press.

"It's not going to change our position. Again, we will not commit national suicide to get a good op-ed for two minutes."

Mr Albanese on Monday said Australia's position was developed as part of a "coordinated global effort" to build momentum towards a two-state solution.

Two weeks earlier, however, in the days after France became the first G7 nation to pledge to recognise a Palestinian state at the United Nations meeting in September, Mr Albanese said Australia would not be making a similar declaration "imminently".

Pressed on Tuesday about when that changed and a decision was made, Mr Albanese cited the announcements from other like-minded nations and commitments from the Palestinian Authority, as well as Mr Netanyahu's comments, which he said were in response to the conversation they had days earlier.

"I spoke with Prime Minister Netanyahu last week and indicated to him the direction that Australia was headed," he said.

"Prime Minister Netanyahu, before yesterday's statement … before our Cabinet met, made comments based upon the discussion I'd had with him."

Coalition questions feasibility of plan

The plan to recognise a Palestinian state in September marks a break in Australia's long-held bipartisan approach to the Middle East, with the Coalition firmly rejecting any move to recognise before the hostages taken by Hamas are released and a peace process is finalised.

Foreign affairs spokesperson Michaelia Cash on Tuesday slammed the decision, questioning whether it could even be done.

"What state is he recognising as a state? You don't actually recognise a new state until that state exists," she told the ABC.

"He's now committed Australia to recognising as a state an entity with no agreed borders, no single government in effective control of its territory. You've got to be honest … what does that even mean?"

In a separate interview, Ms Ley said the government's announcement disrespects the United States because "any peace that happens in this region will be brokered by the US" and "the prospects of a ceasefire are not good with this decision".

"The prime minister has so many questions to answer on this … and I don't know that he's actually addressing them at all," she said.

"He has said that recognition of Palestine is conditional, but he actually refuses to say what will happen if the conditions that he sets out for recognition are not met."

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-08-12/albanese-says-israel-prime-minister-in-denial/105640946

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109525

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23456903 (120915ZAUG25) Notable: Birkins, Rolex and $400,000 mystery item: police raid home of alleged Chinese spy – Federal police allege a Canberra woman spied on the Guan Yin Citta Buddhist Association for China’s Public Security Bureau, receiving more than $230,000 in payments since 2017. Court documents say she covertly gathered residential, financial and sentiment data, including photos and maps, under the direction of a handler in Jindong, China. A July 30 raid found Hermes handbags, a $24,000 Rolex receipt, $5,000 cash and a receipt for a mystery $400,000 item. Police say she later sought refuge at the Chinese consulate. Denied bail, she is accused of targeting a diaspora minority on Beijing’s behalf., MISSING MEDIA/FILES: A_woman_arrested_in_Canberra_accused_of_spying_was_taking_instructions_from_a_mysterious_security_official_police_allege.jpg, Photos_of_the_Canberra_temple_where_the_spying_is_alleged_to_have_taken_place_show_it_is_adorned_with_portraits_of_founder_Lu_Junhong.jpg

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109483

>>109486

>>109514

Birkins, Rolex and $400,000 mystery item: police raid home of alleged Chinese spy

LIAM MENDES - August 11, 2025

1/2

A woman accused of spying on a Canberra Buddhist association was paid more than $200,000 by the Chinese government, and was taking instructions from a mysterious security official over encrypted messaging platform WeChat, federal police officers will allege.

Officers executing a search warrant on the woman’s home last month located hundreds of thousands of dollars worth of ­luxury goods, according to fresh court documents, including a Rolex watch receipt and large boxes of high-end handbags “that were too numerous to practicably count”.

Police also found a receipt for a mystery item costing $400,000.

The woman, who cannot be named due to a suppression order, is alleged to have been working as a “proxy” to covertly gather ­information for an official working for China’s security bureau about Canberra’s Guan Yin Citta Buddhist Association.

The Australian last week ­revealed the woman had been ­involved in a popular Canberra business and potentially had ­access to many politicians, political staffers and journalists through her work, which cannot be disclosed for legal reasons.

The Australian can now reveal that federal police believe other individuals were given tasks by the same Chinese Public Security Bureau official, and officers have seized a “significant” amount of material related to the alleged ­offences that needs to be trans­lated into English.

Court documents show the woman travelled to China on “several occasions in the past ­several years” including to the ­region where her alleged security handler was employed. She is alleged to have received “taskings” from the handler attached to the Jindong Branch – 650km east of Wuhan – from June 2, 2022, to ­covertly collect information and infiltrate the association.

Police believe the woman, who first entered Australia on a higher education visa, secretly collected information about the Guan Yin Citta organisation, including ­details regarding the residential addresses of former leaders of the group and their national office locations.

She allegedly provided photos of the front doors of businesses, internal map data of locations and financial information about organisations and businesses, as well as gathering information about a radio station and its affiliations with the Buddhist group.

She also allegedly fed information about general sentiments relating to Taiwan and other ­factional struggles to the Chinese handler.

The documents show police believe she received more than $230,223 in payments from the People’s Republic of China since 2017, and maintains “strong links” to China – including having ­family living there and possessing an active Chinese passport.

The passport was seized during a police raid on July 30, during which time officers located: ­Hermes bags (believed to be Kelly or Birkin bags) one of which is understood to be worth about $30,000; about $5000 in $100 bills; and high-end watch receipts including one for a $24,000 Rolex.

The officers also located “large quantities of designer brands” ­including Burberry, Gucci and Louis Vuitton, and a receipt for a $400,000 item that has been ­redacted.

Police spoke with the woman while the search warrant was executed. According to the documents, she “answered freely around topics that were unrelated to her offending” but provided “no comment” responses when asked about her alleged crimes.

During the search, officers also located a Guan Yin Citta booklet.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109526

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23456934 (120952ZAUG25) Notable: No transition from gender reality, app boss Sall Grover tells court – Giggle for Girls founder Sall Grover told the Federal Court she does not accept that a person who has transitioned from male to female is a woman, after barristers for Roxanne Tickle argued she was discriminated against on gender identity grounds by being excluded from the app. Tickle, who underwent gender-affirming surgery in 2019 and is legally recognised as female, said Grover’s public misgendering was distressing and fuelled online hate. The case is the first Federal Court test of gender identity protections under the Sex Discrimination Act, with the Commissioner arguing sex is changeable., MISSING MEDIA/FILES: Giggle_for_Girls_app_founder_Sall_Grover.jpg, Sall_Grover_right_leaving_court.jpg, Roxanne_Tickle.jpg, Sex_Discrimination_Commissioner_Dr_Anna_Cody_centre.jpg

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109499

>>109506

No transition from gender reality, app boss Sall Grover tells court

JOANNA PANAGOPOULOS - April 10, 2024

The founder of a women's-only social media app says she does not accept that a person who trans­itions from male to female surgically, socially and legally is a woman, and removed her from the app as she does with “all males”.

The view, held by Giggle for Girls app founder and CEO Sall Grover was described in court on Wednesday by Roxanne Tickle’s legal team as being at the “heart” of the discrimination case.

Ms Tickle, who underwent gender-affirming surgery in 2019 and is now designated as female on her birth certificate, argues she was discriminated against on the grounds of gender identity by Giggle for Girls and Ms Grover when she was denied access to the app. Ms Tickle claims she was ­initially accepted into the app in February 2021 when she submitted a “selfie” through Giggle’s third-party artificial intelligence tool but was later blocked by Ms Grover.

Barrister Bridie Nolan, for Ms Grover, says the app was ­designed “for the purpose of achieving equality between men and women in public life by providing an online refuge”, and so does not amount to discrimination as it is a “special measure”.

But Georgina Costello KC, acting for Ms Tickle, said: “The critical issue in this case, your honour, is that the first and second respondents, Ms Grover and the company Giggle for Girls, have persisted in misgendering the ­applicant for years. That’s the heart of this case – that there’s been a discrimination on the basis of gender in excluding her from the app and persisting in misgendering her subsequently.”

It is the first time a case alleging gender identity discrimination has been heard by the Federal Court following changes to the Sex Discrimination Act in 2013, which made it unlawful to discriminate against a person on the basis of sexual orientation, gender identity or intersex status.

Ms Costello asked Ms Grover in cross-examination whether “even where a person who was assigned male gender at birth has transitioned to being a woman” by having gender-affirming surgery, taking hormones to make them grow breasts, removing their facial hair, wearing female clothing and using female changing rooms, “you don’t accept that that person is a woman, do you?”

“No,” Ms Grover replied.

Ms Costello continued: “I suggest to you that in Australian ­society, the natural meaning of, the ordinary, contemporary meaning of woman, includes women whose gender is dated to be a woman on their birth certificate, having transitioned from man to woman?”

“I don’t agree,” Ms Grover replied.

Ms Costello also questioned Ms Grover about the alleged hurt caused to Ms Tickle through interviews and tweets referring to her as a man.

The court heard Ms Tickle said in an affidavit Ms Grover’s public statements about the case had been “distressing, demoralising, draining and hurtful” and claimed the “scale of online hate” towards her, as a result, was “enormous”.

Ms Grover agreed she would have done about 20 to 50 interviews about the case, most recently travelling to the UK for press, and that she frequently described Ms Tickle as a man, and as a “man wanting access to female spaces”.

Ms Grover also said she had told interviewers she was “harassed by the applicant” and “afraid of the applicant”.

Ms Costello put to her that it was “not kind” to refer to Ms Tickle as a man. “I don’t think it’s kind to expect a woman to see a man as a woman,” Ms Grover responded.

In her opening address on Tuesday, Ms Nolan argued “sex” is a biological and binary concept, while Ms Tickle’s legal team argued it is partly psychological and social.

On Wednesday afternoon, barrister Zelie Heger, on behalf of the Sex Discrimination Commissioner submitted that “sex” for the purpose of the Sexual Discrimination Act is “changeable” and “non-binary” and as a result not “only” biological.

The Commissioner is assisting the Court by providing submissions about the meaning, scope and validity of relevant provisions of the Sex Discrimination Act 1984 (Cth).

Ms Heger also said a person can be of the “female sex” as per the Act “if they are registered as such” and “had gender affirming surgery”.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/landmark-transgender-discrimination-case-gets-to-the-heart-of-the-issue/news-story/b22d1b53bf48a5db1686015c38d7306e

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109527

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23456939 (120959ZAUG25) Notable: Giggle app founder Sall Grover mulls move to US if female-only spaces found to be illegal – Giggle for Girls founder Sall Grover says she may move her business to the US if Australian courts rule her female-only platform unlawful, citing free speech protections under the First Amendment. Grover is appealing a Federal Court finding she discriminated against trans woman Roxanne Tickle, with Equality Australia expected to support Tickle in an appeal to the High Court if Grover wins. Grover criticised Australian institutions, drew parallels with cases overseas, and said her defence is crowdfunded. She remains confident section 7D of the Sex Discrimination Act protects female-only measures., MISSING MEDIA/FILES: Giggle_app_founder_Sall_Grover_right_says_she_may_have_to_move_to_the_US_to_establish_her_business_even_if_the_Federal_Court_finds_in_her_favour_in_her_appeal_against_Roxanne_Tickle.jpg, Brazilian_feminist_Isabella_Cepa.jpg

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109499

>>109506

>>109526

Giggle app founder Sall Grover mulls move to US if female-only spaces found to be illegal

STEPHEN RICE - August 11, 2025'

1/2

Giggle for Girls app founder Sall Grover may leave Australia to set up her business in the US if the Federal Court rules that her female-only networking platform is unlawful in her home country.

Ms Grover faces months before a decision in her appeal against a finding that she discriminated against trans woman Roxanne Tickle – and the high likelihood that, even if she wins, the case will be appealed to the High Court with backing from the Sex Discrimination Commissioner and powerful lobby group Equality Australia.

“At the forefront of my mind is leaving the country because if I can’t run a business for women here, why should I be here?” Ms Grover told The Australian.

“At least in the US we could get the app up and running – 100 per cent we could, because the other part of the case is free speech, and I wouldn’t mind living in a country with a First Amendment.”

The First Amendment to the US Constitution declares the government shall not make a law “abridging the freedom of speech”, while safeguarding other freedoms.

Ms Grover worked as a screenwriter in the US for a decade but left after experiencing sexual harassment. She says she wouldn’t go back to Los Angeles or New York but would go “somewhere much more rural”.

“A lot of Australian families are leaving, they’re moving to Bali and places like that, either people for financial reasons, or because of an infringement of rights,” she said. “If that’s the direction the country is going, if you’re going to push out hard working people or innovators or business owners, then what are you going to be left with - people on NDIS?”

Ms Grover expressed sympathy for Brazilian feminist Isabella Cepa, who was forced into exile after facing up to 25 years in prison for “misgendering” a powerful politician in her home country. The graphic designer has been granted refugee status in Europe, making her the first person to be given international protection from persecution for speaking against transgender ideology.

“It’s torture, what she’s gone through,” Ms Grover said. “This is how persecuted women are for not going along with gender ideology. It’s as if, in different countries, they’re choosing a woman to be an example to everybody else to get scared into silence and not challenge it.”

Responding to suggestions that Ms Cepa could be offered asylum in Australia, Ms Grover said: “My recommendation for anybody who is fleeing gender persecution would be to stay as far away from Australia as possible. You’ve probably got a better chance in Russia – that’s the sad reality. We’ve got beautiful beaches, but horrible institutions and weak politicians.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109528

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23460988 (130908ZAUG25) Notable: Albanese faces backlash after Hamas praises PM’s ‘courage’ on Palestinian recognition – Hamas has hailed Anthony Albanese’s decision to recognise a Palestinian state as “political courage,” claiming its October 7 attacks helped spur Western governments, including Australia, to shift positions. Senior Hamas figure Sheikh Hassan Yousef praised Australia’s move and rejected conditions that the group disarm or be excluded from elections. Albanese dismissed the claim, insisting Hamas opposes two states and that recognition is tied to Palestinian Authority commitments. Israeli officials, Jewish leaders and the Coalition accused Labor of emboldening terrorists, while critics within Labor warned Hamas would exploit recognition to legitimise its violent tactics., MISSING MEDIA/FILES: A_co_founder_of_terrorist_group_Hamas_Sheikh_Hassan_Yousef_right_has_welcomed_the_Albanese_government_s_decision_to_recognise_Palestine.jpg, GS_1.jpg

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109251

>>109520

>>109521

Albanese faces backlash after Hamas praises PM’s ‘courage’ on Palestinian recognition

Matthew Knott - August 13, 2025

1/2

Listed terrorist group Hamas has applauded the Albanese government’s decision to recognise Palestine, arguing the move by Australia and other Western governments has vindicated its shock October 7 attacks on Israel and commitment to armed resistance.

Rejecting Prime Minister Anthony Albanese’s claim that Hamas would be “totally opposed” to the move to recognise Palestine as part of a global effort to progress a two-state solution, one of the militant organisation’s top officials praised the government for showing “political courage” and urged other nations to follow suit.

Sheikh Hassan Yousef, a co-founder of Hamas who has been arrested several times by Israel, made clear the group rejected the rival Palestinian Authority’s calls for it to demilitarise and be excluded from Palestinian elections, conditions Albanese cited when explaining the decision to recognise Palestinian statehood.

“We welcome Australia’s decision to recognise the state of Palestine, and consider it an important step towards achieving justice for our people and securing their legitimate rights,” Yousef, one of Hamas’ most senior officials in the occupied West Bank, said in a statement to this masthead.

“This position reflects political courage and a commitment to the values of justice and the right of peoples to self-determination.

“We call on all countries, especially those that believe in freedom and human dignity, to follow Australia’s example and translate their positions into practical steps to support the Palestinian people and end their suffering under occupation.”

The Israeli government and federal opposition have vehemently opposed the government’s move to recognise Palestine, saying it rewards Hamas’ terror tactics and would embolden the group to continue fighting in Gaza.

Albanese has rejected that argument, telling Channel Seven’s Sunrise on Tuesday: “Hamas will be totally opposed to this decision. Hamas don’t support two states, they support one state.”

Yousef’s statement is the first time that Hamas has commented on Australia’s decision to recognise Palestine at the United Nations General Assembly in September.

Israeli Foreign Minister Gideon S’ar responded to the comments on social media by using a love heart emoji to say that “Hamas loves Albanese”.

Opposition foreign affairs spokeswoman Michaelia Cash said that “Albanese should hang his head in shame” after being praised by Hamas.

“Mr Albanese has emboldened a terror group who murder civilians in cold blood and still hold 50 Israeli hostages in tunnels under Gaza,” she said.

“This is a sad day for our nation.”

Opposition leader Sussan Ley called for the government to rethink its decision, saying: “Now prime minister, if you’ve got a listed terrorist organisation cheering on your foreign policy, it might be time to admit that you got it wrong.”

Hamas fighters stormed into southern Israel on October 7, 2023, killing about 1200 people, including the massacre of young people at the Nova music festival and elderly residents and children living in kibbutzes near the Gaza border. It was the worst mass murder of Jews in a single day since the Holocaust.

Hamas, which has governed the Gaza Strip since 2007, also took around 250 people hostage, dozens of whom are believed to have died in captivity during the war in Gaza. The incursion sparked a ferocious military response from Israel that has extended for almost two years and killed over 60,000 Palestinians.

Australia listed Hamas, which has launched rocket attacks into Israel and carried out suicide bombings, as a terror organisation in 2022, joining the United States, United Kingdom and other countries.

Asked whether Hamas believed its commitment to violence had encouraged countries like Australia to recognise Palestine, Yousef said: “Yes, we believe that the escalation of armed resistance, including the operations carried out on October 7, has significantly contributed to highlighting the suffering of the Palestinian people and the injustice they face.

“These operations have drawn global attention to the Palestinian cause and compelled many countries and organisations to reconsider their positions, leading to greater support and recognition of Palestine as a state by some countries.

“Resistance has proven to be an effective means to break the siege and bring the Palestinian cause back to the international discussion table.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109529

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23460999 (130920ZAUG25) Notable: Albanese ‘detached from reality’ as Hamas praises recognition – Israeli Deputy Foreign Minister Sharren Haskel, a former Australian citizen, has accused Anthony Albanese of being “detached from reality” after Hamas praised his decision to recognise Palestinian statehood. Haskel said recognition, tied by Albanese to commitments from Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas on reform and elections, would only empower Hamas, which polls suggest would win. She warned Australia had delivered a gift to terrorists and undermined security cooperation. The comments came as Australia joined 25 nations in condemning Israel for curbing aid to Gaza, while US Secretary of State Marco Rubio dismissed Western recognition moves as symbolic politics., MISSING MEDIA/FILES: Israel_s_Deputy_Foreign_Minister_Sharren_Haskel_a_one_time_Australian_citizen_said_Albanese_s_decision_was_a_blow_from_a_country_Israel_regarded_as_a_friend_as_well_as_key_partner_on_security_cooperation.jpg, SH_1.jpg

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109251

>>109520

>>109521

Albanese ‘detached from reality’ as Hamas praises recognition

Andrew Tillett - Aug 13, 2025

1/2

A top Israeli minister has accused Anthony Albanese of being “detached from reality” about Palestine recognition as terror group Hamas praised the Prime Minister for showing “courage” around Palestinian statehood.

Israel’s Deputy Foreign Minister Sharren Haskel, a one-time Australian citizen, said Albanese’s decision was a blow from a country Israel regarded as a friend, as well as key partner on security cooperation.

Amid Israel’s ongoing rage over Australia’s decision, which Haskel warns will help supporters of Hamas win elections, the terror organisation released a statement welcoming the move.

“[We] consider it an important step towards achieving justice for our people and securing their legitimate rights,” Hamas co-founder Sheikh Hassan Yousef said in a statement to The Sydney Morning Herald and The Age.

“This position reflects political courage and a commitment to the values of justice and the right of peoples to self-determination.”

Hamas’ acclaim for Albanese is at odds with the prime minister’s insistence the terror group would be opposed to recognition and affirmation for the two-state-solution peace process because it was committed to Israel’s destruction.

Haskel maintained the recognition moves by Australia, France, Canada and the United Kingdom were motivated more by domestic political considerations, a view US Secretary of State Marco Rubio echoed overnight.

“It is very disappointing,” she said in an interview with The Australian Financial Review from Nigeria, where Haskel was discussing counter-terrorism cooperation with government officials.

“This is throwing away years of diplomatic relations. This was gifted to Hamas. One of the leaders of Hamas have said this recognition of a Palestinian was a ‘fruit’ of the Seventh of October [terrorist attack in 2023].

“Unfortunately Prime Minister Albanese and the government have helped Hamas harvest their reward for the worst massacre of Jews since the Holocaust.”

Haskel’s comments came as Australia joined 25 other Western countries including the UK and Japan as well as the European Union to issue fresh condemnation of Israel for curbing supplies of aid to wartorn Gaza.

The signatories pleaded with Israel to abandon new registration requirements that non-government organisations warn will force them to cease aid operations in Gaza and the West Bank.

“The humanitarian suffering in Gaza has reached unimaginable levels. Famine is unfolding before our eyes. Urgent action is needed now to halt and reverse starvation. Humanitarian space must be protected, and aid should never be politicised,” the joint statement said.

Israel’s embassy in Canberra responded to the statement by saying while it shared concerns over humanitarian suffering in Gaza, it was “deeply troubling” that mention of Israeli hostages was relegated to a single sentence towards the bottom of the statement.

“We have yet to hear to the Australian government speak with the same urgency about their humanitarian situation,” the embassy said.

Albanese announced on Monday Australia would recognise Palestinian statehood on the sidelines of the United Nations’ General Assembly meeting in New York in September, arguing Western moves to do so would help keep alive the two-state solution to create an independent Palestine and bring peace to the Middle East.

However, the Coalition has promised to revoke recognition when it next forms government, while pro-Palestinian supporters argue it is insufficient and tougher action needs to be taken against Israel, such as sanctions on a wider range of ministers.

Rubio, in a radio interview on Monday US time, derided the Western push to recognise Palestine as “largely meaningless”.

“It’s symbolic, and they’re doing it primarily for one reason, and that is their internal politics, their domestic politics,” said Rubio.

“In the UK, in France, in many parts of Europe and Ireland, for a long time their domestic politics have turned anti-Israel or whatever it may be, and they’re getting a lot of domestic pressure to do something.

“The truth of the matter is that the future of that region is not going to be decided by some UN resolution [or] … some press release by a prime minister or a president from some country … It’s going to be decided … when Palestinian areas are not governed by terrorist organisations. Because that’s truly what this comes down to, and that is the security of Israel.”

Rubio last week blamed France’s move to recognise Palestine for the collapse in ceasefire talks, saying it had encouraged Hamas to walk away from the negotiating table.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109530

File: d417cb7fbec65e9⋯.jpg (201.93 KB,1920x1280,3:2,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23461005 (130926ZAUG25) Notable: ‘Not married to one solution’: Trump won’t criticise Albanese’s Palestine state call – The White House has declined to criticise Australia’s decision to recognise a Palestinian state, with officials saying Donald Trump is “not married to any one solution” on the conflict. While reiterating he will not recognise Palestine himself, Trump’s team said he opposed rewarding Hamas but remained open-minded about paths to peace. It marked Washington’s first response since Canberra’s announcement, contrasting with US Secretary of State Marco Rubio’s dismissal of such moves as “symbolic” and politically driven. Anthony Albanese tied recognition to commitments from Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas, including reform, elections and excluding Hamas.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109251

>>109520

>>109521

‘Not married to one solution’: Trump won’t criticise Albanese’s Palestine state call

Michael Koziol - August 13, 2025

Washington: The White House has declined to criticise Australia’s announcement that it will recognise a Palestinian state, saying in its first comments on the decision that President Donald Trump was “not married to any one solution” on the Israel-Palestine conflict.

While Trump has mocked the significance of France recognising Palestine, and insinuated on Truth Social that Canada could impact trade talks if it made the same move, he has stayed silent since Canberra’s announcement.

The White House also rebuffed numerous requests for comment ahead of Australia’s decision, pointing only to Trump’s public remarks about other countries.

But on Tuesday (Wednesday AEST), when asked specifically about Australia’s move to recognise Palestine, a White House official told this masthead that while Trump was not going to recognise Palestine himself, he had an open mind on the issue.

“As the president stated, he would be rewarding Hamas if he recognises a Palestinian state, and he doesn’t think they should be rewarded. So he is not going to do that,” the official said.

“However, the president is not married to any one solution as it pertains to building a more peaceful region.”

The statement marks the first public comment from the White House since Australia broke with the US to recognise Palestine.

At the same time, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio continued to argue it was meaningless for other countries to recognise the territory as a sovereign state, and claimed governments were choosing to do so now due to domestic political considerations.

Asked by New York radio personality Sid Rosenberg about the move by Australia, Ireland and other countries, Rubio said: “It’s symbolic, and they’re doing it primarily for one reason, and that is their internal politics, their domestic politics.

“In the UK, in France, in many parts of Europe and Ireland, for a long time their domestic politics has turned anti-Israel or whatever it may be, and they’re getting a lot of domestic pressure to do something, but it’s largely meaningless.”

Rubio did not specifically mention Australia in his answer.

“The truth of the matter is that the future of that region is not going to be decided by some UN resolution. It’s not going to be decided by some press release by a prime minister or a president from some country,” Rubio said.

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese announced on Monday that Australia would recognise Palestinian statehood at next month’s United Nations General Assembly meeting.

The move came after weeks of deliberations that included a conversation with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and a phone call with Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas, both last week.

Albanese said the decision was predicated on commitments from the Palestinian Authority that Hamas could play no role in a future Palestinian state, that it must recognise Israel’s right to exist, hold general elections and reform governance, education and international oversight.

The Israeli government lashed the decision, saying it was a reward for the terror group Hamas and that recognising Palestine was one of the fruits of the attack the group launched against Israel in October 2023.

Albanese on Tuesday accused Netanyahu of being in denial about the consequences of the conflict in Gaza, but vowed to continue relations despite the escalating disagreement.

The war began on October 7, 2023, when Hamas-led militants stormed into southern Israel, killing 1200 people and taking 251 hostages, according to Israeli figures. Israel’s offensive against Hamas in Gaza since then has killed more than 61,000 Palestinians, according to local health officials.

There are growing global concerns over Israel’s plan to intensify the war and take Gaza City – the territory’s biggest population centre – amid warnings about starvation, civilian casualties and lack of medical care.

https://www.smh.com.au/world/north-america/not-married-to-one-solution-trump-won-t-criticise-albanese-s-palestine-state-call-20250813-p5mmgw.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109531

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23461010 (130929ZAUG25) Notable: Marco Rubio slams Australia’s ‘meaningless’ Palestine move – US Secretary of State Marco Rubio has dismissed Australia’s decision to recognise a Palestinian state as “largely meaningless,” accusing Canberra and other Western governments of bowing to domestic anti-Israel sentiment. Rubio said recognition was symbolic and would not affect realities on the ground, stressing peace depends on removing terrorist groups from power in Palestinian areas. He reiterated that Israel’s war began after Hamas’s October 7 attacks and would continue while such groups govern. The rebuke highlights a widening rift, with Anthony Albanese unable to secure a meeting with Donald Trump or tariff relief amid tensions.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109251

>>109520

>>109521

Marco Rubio slams Australia’s ‘meaningless’ Palestine move

Vanessa Marsh - August 13, 2025

America’s top diplomat has lashed Australia’s “meaningless” move to recognise Palestinian statehood, saying governments were bowing to domestic anti-Israel sentiment that would ultimately make no difference on the ground.

United States Secretary of State Marco Rubio issued the scathing rebuke of moves by Australia, France, Canada and the UK toward a two-state solution at the United Nations General Assembly next month.

“It’s largely meaningless,” Mr Rubio said.

“It’s symbolic, and they’re doing it primarily for one reason, and that is their internal politics, their domestic politics.”

Mr Rubio said the anti-Israel sentiment growing across the world, including in the UK and Europe, had put pressure on those governments to act.

“The truth of the matter is that the future of that region is not going to be decided by some UN resolution,” he said.

“It’s not going to be decided by some press release by a prime minister or a president from some country.

“It’s going to be decided on the ground. It’s going to be decided by: when will the day come when Palestinian areas are not governed by terrorist organisations? Because that’s truly what this comes down to, and that is the security of Israel.”

The United States has remained a staunch ally of Israel and refused to recognise a Palestinian state.

Prior to Australia’s announcement, US President Donald Trump last month voiced his “displeasure and disagreement” with similar moves by the UK and Canada.

Mr Trump described it as rewarding Hamas at a time when the terrorist group was hampering ceasefire efforts and continuing to hold hostages in Gaza.

Two days after Australia’s announcement, Mr Rubio said peace in the Middle East hinged on eliminating groups intent on the destruction of the Jewish state, reiterating the only reason there was a war in Gaza was because Israel was attacked on October 7.

“And as long as people govern these spaces who are going to attack Israel, you are not going to have peace,” he told WABC radio.

“That’s a fact. Whether people want to accept that or not, the sooner they accept it, the sooner we have a chance at peace there. It’s difficult and it ain’t easy, but that’s a fact. But all these statements are meaningless … they’re not going to change anything.”

Australia’s departure from its key ally in the US comes at a strained time in the relationship.

Mr Albanese has been unable to secure a face-to-face meeting with Mr Trump and attempts to secure a tariff exemption have been unsuccessful.

The pair could finally come face-to-face at next month’s UN meeting in New York.

https://www.couriermail.com.au/news/world/north-america/marco-rubio-slams-australias-meaningless-palestine-move/news-story/b538c401d9bb79baebef9c757f556947

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7OuMkV4HL2c

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109532

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23461015 (130936ZAUG25) Notable: Brisbane hoping to play host to Quad leaders – Queensland Premier David Crisafulli is lobbying Japan’s Shigeru Ishiba and India’s Narendra Modi for Brisbane to host next year’s Quad Leaders’ Summit, arguing it would boost trade links and investment ahead of the 2032 Olympics. He has also pitched the idea to Anthony Albanese, who is said to be open to it. The push follows tensions with Indian and Japanese business under the previous Labor government. Crisafulli said hosting the Quad would showcase Queensland’s global role, while the next summit could mark Albanese’s first meeting with Donald Trump if New Delhi’s talks falter., MISSING MEDIA/FILES: Queensland_Premier_David_Crisafulli_is_pushing_for_the_state_to_host_the_next_Quad_meeting_in_Brisbane.jpg, The_request_comes_amid_concerns_the_next_planned_meeting_in_New_Delhi_later_this_year_may_not_go_ahead_due_to_increasing_hostilities_between_Mr_Modi_and_US_President_Donald_Trump_over_America_s_tariff_policy.jpg

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109234

>>109241

>>109513

Brisbane hoping to play host to Quad leaders

MACKENZIE SCOTT - 12 August 2025

Premier David Crisafulli is lobbying the leaders of Japan and India for Queensland to host the powerful diplomatic Quad Leaders’ Summit in Brisbane next year, in a move he says would revitalise the state’s international trade links and open the door to investment opportunities.

Mr Crisafulli has written to ­Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba in a bid to ­secure Australia’s first meeting of the reformed Quad, framing the push as an attempt to rebuild relations with big business in both ­nations that were tested under the previous state Labor government.

The request comes amid concerns the next planned meeting in New Delhi later this year may not go ahead due to increasing hostilities between Mr Modi and US President Donald Trump over America’s tariff policy.

“Now is the time to get the Quad to Queensland,” Mr Crisafulli told The Australian, ahead of his first international trip as Queensland Premier to both ­nations this month.

“As we start the runway to the 2032 Games, Queensland has never been better placed to host the Quad Leaders’ Summit, with our strategic location, multilateral trade links, and world-class infrastructure.

The Premier has already made his pitch to Anthony Albanese to continue the pair’s “strong relationship” and “cannoli diplomacy” in a letter obtained by The Australian. It is understood Mr Albanese has told Queensland officials that he was open to the idea of the next Quad meeting being held in Brisbane, which is also holding the 2032 Olympics.

Indian business leaders accused Queensland Labor of politicising the treatment of Indian conglomerate Adani in 2017 over its then proposed coalmine. And the Japanese ambassador accused the Palaszczuk government in 2022 of insulting mining companies oper­ating in the state with unheralded coal royalty hikes.

“Hosting The Quad Leaders’ Summit will demonstrate our commitment to revitalising Queensland’s international trade relationships, which we must rebuild following the disrespect of our trusted partners by the former Labor government,” Mr Crisafulli said.

“Unlocking investment opportunities with India, Japan and the US will build on our existing multi-billion-dollar trade in energy and resources, food and fibre, and education, which will deliver a better lifestyle through a stronger economy for all Queenslanders.”

The next Quad meeting, which could be held as early as September if it goes ahead, could mark the first time Mr Albanese will meet with Mr Trump. However, Mr Modi is believed to have avoided locking in a date after Mr Trump hosted Pakistan’s army chief in Washington and praised his counter-terrorism efforts as military action between the Asian neighbours continued to build.

Mr Crisafulli first revealed his push to host the Quad meeting at a joint Queensland Futures Institute and American Chamber of Commerce in Australia 4th of July event in Brisbane, declaring it would strengthen Queensland’s relationship with the US.

He said Brisbane did not get the expected “buzz” when it held the G20 summit in 2013, recalling that the location was overshadowed by the attendance of then US president Barack Obama and Russian leader Vladimir Putin.

Queensland hopes to bolster India relations, securing new direct flights to increase tourism and international student attraction.

The Premier’s letter to Mr Albanese was one of the first pieces of correspondence between the pair following the Prime Minister’s re-election in May, which he secured with a strong swing in suburban Brisbane.

The leaders, who both boast Italian heritage, signed a deal for $2.8bn in federal funding for state schools over cannoli in March.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/brisbane-hoping-to-play-host-to-quad-leaders/news-story/3bf73cfb17803bdb52373dadfd8477ae

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109533

File: 6799665e0452a5c⋯.jpg (393.09 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23461026 (130954ZAUG25) Notable: US congressman spruiks Australia relationship at future AUKUS shipyard – US congressmen Joe Courtney and Trent Kelly joined Assistant Defence Minister Peter Khalil at Adelaide’s Osborne Naval Shipyard, with Kelly praising the US-Australia alliance as “irreplaceable.” Khalil said AUKUS was “critical” for Australia’s defence, highlighting the deterrence value of Virginia-class submarines and future AUKUS boats. More than $1.5 billion has already been invested in the site, where five nuclear-powered submarines are planned if Washington proceeds. The visit came as Trump’s defence chief Elbridge Colby delayed a review of AUKUS, which Canberra supports despite resisting US pressure to lift defence spending to 3.5% of GDP., MISSING MEDIA/FILES: Republican_congressman_Trent_Kelly_says_the_US_Australia_relationship_can_t_be_replicated_.jpg, Assistant_Defence_Minister_Peter_Khalil_says_AUKUS_is_an_investment_in_peace_.jpg

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109299

>>109316

>>109405

>>109512

US congressman spruiks Australia relationship at future AUKUS shipyard

JOSEPH OLBRYCHT-PALMER - 13 August 2025

AUKUS is “critical” to Australia’s defence, Assistant Defence Minister Peter Khalil has declared while spruiking it in Adelaide with visiting US congressmen.

US representatives Joe Courtney and Trent Kelly are in Australia for the Australian American Leadership Dialogue – an annual conference aimed at highlighting the deep ties between Canberra and Washington.

Both men are staunch supporters of the US-Australia alliance, including AUKUS, which the Trump administration is reviewing.

Speaking to media, Mr Kelly, a Republican like Donald Trump, said the bilateral relationship was like no other.

“Our relationship with our Australian partners is one that cannot be can’t be replicated,” he told reporters, standing alongside Mr Khalil and South Australian Premier Peter Malinauskas.

“And so it’s important that we continue to grow as friends.

“I’ve seen that relationship over the last two or three years as AUKUS has matured, grow stronger and better.”

Mr Kelly was speaking from Osborne Naval Shipyard, where five nuclear-power AUKUS submarines will be built, assuming the US stays in the defence pact.

More than $1.5 billion in federal funds have already been pumped into preparing to build and maintain them.

Australia will also get at least three American-made Virginia-class submarines under the agreement.

Mr Khalil said the Albanese government welcomed the Trump administration’s review, declaring it “brings forward the issues that are actually important for us to discuss about how we can get the best out of this partnership”.

“The AUKUS partnership is something that is historic,” he said.

“It’s critical, it’s important.”

He went on to say the “advanced capability that we get out of the Virginia-class and the future AUKUS submarines is extremely important”.

“We’re talking about making sure that we have the ADF and the defence capability to deter and deny adversaries from impacting negatively our national interests, forcing others to come back to the negotiating table rather than using force,” Mr Khalil said.

“Investment in defence is about investment in peace.”

US President Donald Trump’s defence policy chief Elbridge Colby announced he was delaying the AUKUS review late last month and did not give a firm date for its completion.

Instead, Mr Colby, an AUKUS sceptic, said the review would be completed “in the fall” – much longer than the initial 30 days.

The delay comes as the Albanese government resists Washington’s demand to hike defence spending to 3.5 per cent of GDP in response to China’s rapid military build-up.

Announcing the delay, Mr Colby’s office said the AUKUS review would “be an empirical and clear-eyed assessment of the initiative’s alignment with President Trump’s America First approach”.

“As part of this process, the (US Department of Defence) looks forward to continuing regular engagements on this important matter with other parts of the US government, the US Congress, our allies Australia and the United Kingdom and other key stakeholders,” his office said.

“The department anticipates completing the review in the fall.

“Its purpose will be to provide the President and his senior leadership team with a fact-based, rigorous assessment of the initiative.”

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/breaking-news/us-congressman-spruiks-australia-relationship-at-future-aukus-shipyard/news-story/869ed642972a585544157efd6b475446

https://www.insidestategovernment.com.au/adelaide-hosts-australian-american-leadership-dialogue/

https://www.aald.org/

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109534

File: c04f0e425adf6b1⋯.jpg (1.08 MB,3000x1929,1000:643,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23461031 (131001ZAUG25) Notable: United States congressmen Joe Courtney and Trent Kelly visit Adelaide’s naval shipyard and back AUKUS – US congressmen Joe Courtney and Trent Kelly have endorsed the $368bn AUKUS nuclear-powered submarine program during a visit to Adelaide’s Osborne Naval Shipyard, despite the Trump administration’s ongoing review of the pact. Kelly said AUKUS had deepened an already strong alliance, while Courtney praised the “eye-watering investment” in Australia’s shipbuilding sector and noted university collaboration on submarine and unmanned vessel technology. Premier Peter Malinauskas highlighted South Australia’s growing defence role, as both congressmen urged greater technology transfer under AUKUS pillar two, saying all three partners would be “stronger and better together.”, MISSING MEDIA/FILES: Visiting_for_a_high_powered_forum_starting_in_Adelaide_on_Thursday_Republican_Trent_Kelly_and_Democrat_Joe_Courtney_expressed_major_confidence_about_the_AUKUS_pact_in_the_face_of_a_US_administration_review.jpg, Republican_congressman_Trent_Kelly_left_Premier_Peter_Malinauskas_Democratic_congressman_Joe_Courtney_and_Federal_Assistant_Minister_for_Defence_Peter_Khalil_right_tour_Osborne_Naval_Shipyard_in_Adelaide_s_northwest.jpg

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109299

>>109316

>>109405

>>109512

United States congressmen Joe Courtney and Trent Kelly visit Adelaide’s naval shipyard and back AUKUS

Two United State’s congressmen have toured Adelaide’s naval shipyard as the US President’s review of the military deal weighs its “America First” credentials.

Paul Starick - August 13, 2025

Key United States congressmen have strongly endorsed the $368bn AUKUS nuclear-powered submarine program during a tour of its Adelaide naval shipyard base.

Visiting for a high-powered forum starting in Adelaide on Thursday, Republican Trent Kelly and Democrat Joe Courtney expressed major confidence about the AUKUS pact in the face of a US administration review.

Mr Kelly, the House Seapower and Projection Forces subcommittee chairman, said AUKUS had further cemented a relationship between Australia and the US “that I didn’t think could get any better or stronger”.

Mr Courtney, a prominent AUKUS backer and the seapower subcommittee’s ranking member, praised the “eye-watering investment that’s going on in the shipbuilding sector here in Australia”.

The duo are in Adelaide for the Australian American Leadership Dialogue, which will cover topics including AUKUS, defence, critical minerals, energy, social media and health.

The US is reviewing AUKUS, which was inked and planned under the Biden administration, to examine its alignment with the President Donald Trump’s America First Agenda.

Premier Peter Malinauskas, who hosted the congressmen at Osborne Naval Shipyard on Wednesday morning, said South Australia’s role as the home of the AUKUS submarine program presented “a unique opportunity” to build upon existing relationships with the US “and to forge new ones”.

He said SA was “positioning itself as a security and technology partner of choice” in areas including artificial intelligence, electronic warfare, advanced cyber and quantum technologies.

Mr Courtney, whose Connecticut district includes a nuclear submarine yard at Groton, drew attention to collaboration between Connecticut and Adelaide universities on “cutting-edge work for the US Navy in terms of submarines and unmanned vessels … all kinds of stuff that we can’t really talk about that much publicly”.

“We’ve had undergraduate and graduate engineering students come to Adelaide, and the two faculties now have a very healthy back-and-forth dialogue,” he said.

“That’s exactly what, I think, is going to help us deal with the question of, really, a decades-long challenge in terms of, again, creating the trust and the speed with which AUKUS is dedicated to, in terms of achieving the goal of a free and open Pacific.”

Mr Kelly, whose Mississippi district includes the Pascagoula surface ship yard, urged more focus on technology transfer under AUKUS pillar two.

“I think we need to focus some more on pillar two, and make sure we take the opportunities that exist to build things and share things and make each of us greater,” he said.

“The thing I love about AUKUS the most is all three of our partners get stronger and better by doing that together. We are stronger than we are as individuals.”

Mr Kelly, and Mr Courtney in June were among bipartisan authors of a letter to US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth, backing AUKUS and urging the sale of Virginia class submarines go ahead under the pact.

https://www.adelaidenow.com.au/news/south-australia/united-states-congressmen-joe-courtney-and-trent-kelly-visit-adelaides-naval-shipyard-and-back-aukus/news-story/3f99fbcb58cec66ed41d3f347cde2be9

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109535

File: fe90ca7d10fcd52⋯.jpg (439.4 KB,1500x1192,375:298,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23461047 (131016ZAUG25) Notable: ‘Join the club’: US congressman backs Australia in tensions with Trump – US congressman Joe Courtney has defended AUKUS and Australia’s role in the alliance, rejecting claims the transfer of Virginia-class submarines should be scrapped due to US industrial pressures. Touring Adelaide’s shipyard, he said Australia’s $1.6bn contribution to boost production showed commitment, and argued fears about submarine shortages were “totally inaccurate.” Courtney also backed Anthony Albanese’s objections to Trump’s tariffs, calling them unjustified given America’s trade surplus. He said tariffs could be Trump’s “Achilles heel” politically, but stressed bipartisan support for Australia in Congress would help sustain the alliance through current strains., MISSING MEDIA/FILES: US_Democrat_congressman_Joe_Courtney_right_with_Assistant_Defence_Minister_Peter_Khalil_Republican_congressman_Trent_Kelly_and_South_Australian_Premier_Peter_Malinauskas_at_Adelaide_s_shipyard_on_Wednesday.jpg

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109299

>>109316

>>109405

>>109512

‘Join the club’: US congressman backs Australia in tensions with Trump

Andrew Tillett - Aug 13, 2025

One of the US Congress’ strongest AUKUS supporters has warned Donald Trump there is no justification to tear up the plan to sell Australia second-hand nuclear-powered submarines, and rejected suggestions Canberra was not pulling its weight in the US alliance.

Congressman Joe Courtney said the visit to Adelaide this week by a delegation of US legislators including himself for the high-powered Australian American Leadership Dialogue was aimed at showing that Australia remained a valued partner, amid signs of friction between the Trump administration and Albanese government.

Albanese is yet to hold his first face-to-face meeting with Trump after the US president cancelled their planned talks in Canada in June. The White House has shunned Australia’s pleas to be exempted from Trump’s global tariffs, and Albanese is resisting US demands to further increase defence spending to 3.5 per cent of gross domestic product.

A review by senior Pentagon official Elbridge Colby has also cast doubt on the AUKUS pact and one of its key elements, the transfer of Virginia-class submarines to the Australian navy in the 2030s. Colby has previously questioned the wisdom of transferring submarines and weakening the US fleet when there is growing risk of a conflict over Taiwan, with concerns US shipyards will be unable to increase production to provide replacement boats.

But Courtney, a Democrat whose Connecticut district is home to one of America’s two main submarine yards, maintained such fears were overblown.

“Everybody in 2023, which is not that long ago, when the announcement was made, they understood all the challenges the submarine industrial base was going through,” he told The Australian Financial Review.

“The production cadence was thrown off for a number of reasons, the biggest of them being COVID.

“The notion that production and the strength of the industrial base is a problem in 2025 that should nix the sale of the submarines with the idea this was an unexpected risk that wasn’t understood in 2023 is just totally inaccurate.”

Courtney said the US navy had estimated an extra 6 million man-hours were required to ensure America had sufficient submarines, and investments in the shipyards and the industrial base to achieve that were beginning to ramp up and had reached a third of that goal. Australia has contributed $1.6 billion this year to the US to bump up production, with more money to come.

Courtney, who toured Adelaide’s shipyard on Wednesday with South Australian Premier Peter Malinauskas, said majority-Australian-owned shipbuilder Austal’s yard in Alabama would play a crucial role.

“They’re about to hit full operations sometime in the middle of next year and that is going to get the whole system up closer to the 6 million number.

“Two Virginias were delivered last year, two are going to be delivered this year, two are going to be delivered next year.

“It is way premature for the decision to be made on the basis that the submarine inventory is insufficient.

“I have a hard time with this because I’m very close to what is going on, I watch it very closely and I just feel there is no justification for AUKUS to be sidelined because of industrial production.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109536

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23470114 (160442ZAUG25) Notable: Video: Australia's commitment to recognise Palestine met with 'disappointment and disgust' by Trump administration – US Ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee said Australia’s decision to recognise a Palestinian state was met with “disappointment and some disgust” in the Trump administration, calling the timing “terrible” and a “gift” to Hamas. He warned it endangered hostages and could push Israel towards West Bank annexation. Penny Wong said she had notified Secretary of State Marco Rubio in advance, but Huckabee said Israel expected more. He defended Israel’s war conduct, while claiming Donald Trump had done “more than anyone else” to stop starvation by creating a Gaza aid foundation.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109251

>>109520

>>109521

Australia's commitment to recognise Palestine met with 'disappointment and disgust' by Trump administration

Sarah Ferguson - 14 August 2025

The US ambassador to Israel says the Australian government's decision to recognise Palestine was met with disgust by senior members of the Trump administration.

Former Arkansas Governor Mike Huckabee told 7.30 he discussed Australia's decision with US President Donald Trump.

"There's an enormous level of disappointment and some disgust," Ambassador Huckabee said.

"I don't know that the president used that word, [but] I would say that is a characterisation of a sentiment.

"I think it does express the emotional sentiment, a sense of, 'You've got to be kidding … why would they be doing this? And why would they be doing it now'?"

Ambassador Huckabee also said Australia's timing was "terrible".

"I think the timing has been very hurtful to any prospects of negotiating some settlement in Gaza with Hamas … this is a gift to them, and it's unfortunate," he said.

The ambassador continued his critique of the Albanese government's decision, saying it would have a direct impact on the remaining hostages of Hamas.

"For this to come at a time like this, further endangering them and endangering any hopes of some peaceful resolution of dealing with Hamas and getting them to lay down their arms," he said.

Australia followed similar commitments to recognise a Palestinian state at the UN General Assembly in September, that were made by France, Canada and the UK.

"As Israel's closest partner, we would have expected that there would have been some heads up," he said.

On 7.30 this week, Foreign Minister Penny Wong said she had spoken to the US Secretary of State Marco Rubio about the government's intentions.

"As a matter of courtesy, I did want to give him advance notice of our announcement," Ms Wong said.

Annexation of the West Bank

Earlier in the week, Minister Wong warned there would be "no Palestine left" to recognise if the world did not act.

Asked about Senator Wong's comments, Mr Huckabee claimed Australia's decision could inadvertently push Israel towards annexation of the West Bank.

"What Australia and the other countries may have done inadvertently is push Israel to do exactly what they're afraid of," he said.

However, in July, the Israeli Knesset passed a non-binding motion calling for the annexation of the West Bank.

On Thursday, multiple outlets reported that Israeli Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich threatened an expansion of settlements outside Jerusalem.

"Those who try to recognise a Palestinian state will receive from us an answer on the ground … and ensure that by September the hypocritical leaders in Europe will have nothing to recognise," he said.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109537

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23470143 (160449ZAUG25) Notable: Video: Albanese plays down US ‘disgust’ over Palestine recognition – Anthony Albanese has sought to downplay US ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee’s claim that Donald Trump and Marco Rubio reacted with “disgust” and “disappointment” at Australia’s recognition of a Palestinian state. The Prime Minister said Huckabee represented US interests in Israel, not Australia, and stressed his role was to act for Australians, many of whom were horrified by both Hamas’s October 7 massacre and Gaza’s humanitarian crisis. Albanese said recognition supports a two-state solution, following France, Canada and the UK. Opposition Leader Sussan Ley said the stance distracts from genuine peace talks with Washington.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109251

>>109520

>>109521

>>109536

Albanese plays down US ‘disgust’ over Palestine recognition

Nick Bonyhady - August 15, 2025

US ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee says there is disgust and disappointment in the Trump administration at the Albanese government’s decision to recognise a Palestinian state, deepening the rift with Australia’s closest security partner.

Huckabee, a former Republican governor and major supporter of Israel, said he had spoken to President Donald Trump and Secretary of State Marco Rubio, and both men were unhappy with the decision Prime Minister Anthony Albanese announced on Monday.

“There is an enormous level of disappointment, and some disgust,” Huckabee said on the ABC’s 7.30 on Thursday. Huckabee, who led numerous evangelical tour groups to Israel before his appointment as ambassador, did not confirm the exact words used by Rubio or Trump, saying he would not reveal private conversations.

“I think it does express, though, the emotional sentiment, a sense of ‘You’ve got to be kidding. Why would they be doing this? And why would they be doing it now?’”

The comments build pressure on Albanese, who has already faced a storm of criticism this week after Hamas officials praised Australia’s decision to recognise a State of Palestine at a United Nations meeting in September.

Australia’s relationship with the United States has suffered a series of knocks since Trump reclaimed the presidency, including the lack of a meeting between him and Albanese and tension over defence spending. But the Resolve Political Monitor conducted for this masthead shows most people do not blame Albanese for the lack of a meeting, and Australia has the lowest tariff rate available for exports to the US.

Albanese played down the ambassador’s comments, saying Huckabee represented the United States in Israel, not Australia. The prime minister told ABC radio on Friday that his role was to represent Australia’s interests.

“Australians have been disgusted by what they see on their TV every night,” Albanese said.

“They were disgusted by the terrorist actions of Hamas on October 7, the slaughter of innocent Israelis, the taking of hostages and the ongoing holding of those hostages have outraged Australians, but Australians have also seen the death of tens of thousands of people.

“When you have children starving, when you have children losing their lives, with families queuing for food and water, then that provokes, not surprisingly, a human reaction.”

More than 60,000 Palestinians have died from Israel’s assault on Gaza, according to the territory’s health ministry, which is linked to Hamas.

Israel has defended its war in Gaza as a necessary measure to root out the terror group that massacred or kidnapped about 1500 people in October 2023, and blamed Hamas for Gazans’ suffering.

Almost 80 years of conflict, Albanese said, had to end, and recognition for Palestine would help build momentum for a two-state solution.

The move follows similar plans announced by France, Canada and the United Kingdom.

The Trump administration has not appointed an ambassador to Australia, fuelling accusations that Australia is a low diplomatic priority for the White House.

On Thursday, Albanese warned the media about reporting Hamas propaganda after the office of one of the listed terror group’s co-founders issued a statement welcoming Australia’s decision to recognise Palestine. A Telegram post in the organisation’s name then disavowed the message.

“What that should be is a warning to the media of being very careful about the fact that Hamas will engage in propaganda because what is happening is the international community are united about isolating Hamas, about supporting a peaceful way forward,” Albanese said.

But two other senior Hamas officials confirmed the group welcomed recognition for Palestine by Australia.

Hamas media director Ismail Al-Thawabta, who is based in Gaza, told the ABC that Australia’s move to recognise a Palestinian state “reflects a growing global awareness of the necessity to end the injustice suffered by our people for decades”.

Opposition Leader Sussan Ley said Albanese’s position was a distraction from genuine progress towards peace via talks with the United States, which remains Israel’s most crucial ally.

“To see our prime minister stand up there and sound as if he has some sort of gotcha moment in response to the legitimate criticism that is coming at him from everywhere on this issue, by saying he’s found a statement from Hamas saying another statement by Hamas wasn’t correct ... is ridiculous,” Ley said on Sky on Thursday night.

https://www.theage.com.au/politics/federal/albanese-dismisses-us-disgust-over-palestine-recognition-20250815-p5mn6k.html

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FBsGzIfyHro

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109538

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23470225 (160506ZAUG25) Notable: Video: PM’s Palestine decision ‘could blow up’ White House talks, former White House adviser says – Former US National Security Council official Michael Green warned Anthony Albanese’s recognition of a Palestinian state is “unexploded ordnance” that could detonate when he meets Donald Trump. The comments followed US ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee’s claim the Trump administration felt “disappointment and some disgust” at Australia’s move, though Penny Wong insists she warned Marco Rubio in advance. Albanese dismissed Huckabee’s criticism, saying his duty was to represent Australia’s interests. Green said figures such as Pentagon policy chief Elbridge Colby on AUKUS and Huckabee on Gaza were “taking initiative,” making summit planning harder to predict.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109251

>>109520

>>109521

>>109536

PM’s Palestine decision ‘could blow up’ White House talks, former White House adviser says

BEN PACKHAM - August 15, 2025

1/2

Anthony Albanese’s recognition of a Palestinian state is “unexploded ordnance” that could ignite when the Prime Minister meets Donald Trump, former White House National Security Council member Michael Green has warned.

The assessment came after the US’s top diplomat in Israel said President Trump and US Secretary of State Marco Rubio were furious at Australia’s upcoming policy shift on Palestine.

“There’s an enormous level of disappointment and some disgust,” US ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee told the ABC’s 7.30 program.

“We don’t have to pretend that it’s OK, because in our view, it’s not OK.”

Mr Huckabee claimed the Albanese government had neglected to give the Trump administration a “heads-up” on the decision, contradicting Foreign Minister Penny Wong, who said she raised it with Mr Rubio before it was announced.

Dr Green, a former NSC director of Asian affairs, said Mr Huckabee’s comments reflected the views of sections of the Trump administration.

“Huckabee’s daughter was Trump’s first press secretary, so he would be reading the White House carefully and not freelancing, even if he took the initiative to do this on his own,” said Dr Green, who is now chief executive of the United States Studies Centre.

“I doubt Huckabee was asked to do this by State or NSC, but who knows whether somebody like (Vice-President) JD Vance told him to go for it. There is no clear process for these things.”

He said he did not believe the Trump administration as a whole was mobilising to punish Australia for the policy shift, “but there are clearly elements in the administration who are really angry about this and believe that they can go out and do this”.

“For the (Albanese-Trump) summit, it’s like unexploded ordnance. When they eventually meet, this is something that may or may not explode,” Dr Green said.

Mr Albanese brushed aside Mr Huckabee’s criticism.

“He is an ambassador … to another country. Not Australia, Israel. My job is to represent Australia’s interest,” he told ABC radio.

“We’re a sovereign nation. He’s entitled to put his views, but we’re also entitled to put our views, and we didn’t do it shyly.

“I saw the interview last night. He suggested that this came as a surprise. I spoke with (Israeli) Prime Minister (Benjamin) Netanyahu last Thursday night. I asked him, ‘What’s the end point here?’ And the end point is the same as the end point that he had put to me more than a year ago, which was to get rid of Hamas militarily. There was no political solution there.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109539

File: 4f7859ba12bf261⋯.jpg (328.64 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 78e016c71199060⋯.jpg (180.73 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23470401 (160608ZAUG25) Notable: US politicians back AUKUS and bigger defence spend – Visiting US lawmakers voiced bipartisan support for AUKUS while urging Australia to lift defence spending and Donald Trump to visit Australia. Democrat senator Chris Coons praised Canberra’s diplomacy but said more investment in defence was needed given shipyard shortfalls and global threats. Congressman Michael Turner credited Trump’s pressure for NATO’s decision to raise spending to 5 per cent of GDP and suggested allies, including Australia, may follow. Delegation leader Joe Courtney warned past comments by Pentagon official Elbridge Colby on AUKUS were troubling but remained confident submarine transfers would proceed. Both Coons and Turner urged an Albanese–Trump meeting.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109299

>>109316

>>109512

>>109534

US politicians back AUKUS and bigger defence spend

JOE KELLY - August 14, 2025

The leader of a US congressional delegation has encouraged greater defence spending by Canberra, urged Donald Trump to visit Australia and argued that an in-person meeting between the leaders of both nations would be of “real value”.

Speaking in Adelaide on the sidelines of the Australian American Leadership Dialogue, Democrat senator Chris Coons – a member of the Senate Foreign Relations and Appropriations committees – said there was strong bipartisan support in Congress for the landmark AUKUS agreement.

Critiquing the administration’s tariff policies, he noted there were “tensions in the relationship at the moment” and suggested it would be “valuable for President Trump to come and visit Australia”.

However, he provided no assurance about the outcome of the AUKUS review being led by Pentagon policy chief Elbridge Colby. A leading supporter of the AUKUS agreement in the US congress, Joe Courtney, also warned that some of Mr Colby’s past comments about the security partnership had “definitely raised some warning flags”.

While Mr Courtney was optimistic about the ability of the US to produce enough Virginia-class submarines to honour its agreement to provide Australia with three boats from the early 2030s, Senator Coons noted some challenges.

He said the US was “severely constrained in our shipyard capacity and our workforce. We are not hitting our targets in terms of naval construction”.

Amid calls from the US Department of Defence for Anthony Albanese to lift defence spending to 3.5 per cent of GDP, Senator Coons said Australia needed credit for what it was already doing but acknowledged the need for greater efforts to be made.

“All of us need to increase our investment in defence given the threat environment we face,” he said.

“Frankly, Australia is making the investment in other critical capabilities – development and diplomacy – in areas where the United States just cut back sharply.”

“But, of course, I would encourage increased investment in defence,” he said.

Republican congressman Michael Turner, a former chair of the House Intelligence Committee, also said Australia needed credit for its actions on defence spending. But he stressed that “we have to take this in (the) context of what our adversaries are doing”.

Mr Turner said the application of pressure from Mr Trump had helped to facilitate a “wildly successful” NATO summit at The Hague which saw Europe agree to lift its defence spending to 5 per cent of GDP.

“I suspect that all of the allied relationships and certainly even the relationships and the issues that Donald Trump are picking will result in the same (outcome),” he said.

Members of the US delegation – which included two US senators and five members of the US House of Representatives – are scheduled to meet with Anthony Albanese in Sydney after this week touring the Osborne shipyard in Adelaide and stopovers in the Marshall Islands and Papua New Guinea.

Opposition Leader Sussan Ley warned the alliance relationship was in a state of “drift” and told The Australian the Albanese government should extend an invitation for Mr Trump to visit Australia.

She said the country had “such a good story to tell when it comes to the opportunities in our alliance. I’m not sure why the Prime Minister hasn’t invited the President to see it for himself.”

“We all know a strong Australia-United States relationship is critical for our national security and the prosperity of both our nations,” she said.

“Getting the President to see the opportunities on offer for advancing our shared interests is something I’d urge the Prime Minister to pursue.”

“The last presidential visit was in 2014. Since that time the world has changed significantly,” she said.

“To deepen shared understanding of each nations’ interests a presidential visit to Australia would be an important opportunity to ensure Australia and America continue to stand shoulder to shoulder in a volatile world.”

Senator Coons said the US-Australian relationship was “close and longstanding”.

While the relationship would not turn on whether Mr Albanese and Mr Trump had an in-person meeting, he said that “when you are sitting in the same room, watching and talking with someone you have a better conversation. You have a better dialogue with each other in person. So, yes, of course I would see a real value in President Trump making a priority of sitting down with Prime Minister Albanese”.

Mr Turner also said he thought an in-person meeting between both leaders would be a positive development.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/defence/us-politicians-back-aukus-and-bigger-defence-spend/news-story/ec52d0ab3900e94e23e6c6684f7af0bd

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109540

File: 0394e9277491e42⋯.jpg (269.58 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: b973db4d65b196d⋯.jpg (260.65 KB,2047x1152,2047:1152,Clipboard.jpg)

File: c41a1fd1044577f⋯.jpg (182.95 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23470421 (160619ZAUG25) Notable: Beijing accuses Australia of fabricating ‘Chinese espionage threat’ – China’s Ministry of State Security has accused Australia of fabricating espionage threats while itself running covert operations, in a rare rebuke after the arrest of a Chinese woman in Canberra charged with foreign interference. The ministry said it had cracked “multiple espionage cases” instigated by Australian intelligence, accusing Canberra of “self-dramatization” and “persecution fantasies”. It denounced “Chinaphobia” among Australian politicians, while citing trade ties and calling for stability and cooperation. The remarks followed ASIO chief Mike Burgess warning that China, Russia and Iran are leading sources of espionage against Australia.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109325

>>109378

>>109469

>>109483

Beijing accuses Australia of fabricating ‘Chinese espionage threat’

MOHAMMAD ALFARES and SARAH ISON - 15 August 2025

Beijing has accused Australia of fabricating a “Chinese espionage threat” while secretly running covert operations against the Asian nation, in a rare rebuke less than two weeks after a Chinese woman was charged with foreign interference in Canberra.

In a statement published on its official WeChat account, China’s Ministry of State Security ­accused Australian agencies of hyping the “serious threat” of ­foreign spying, casting themselves as innocent “victims” in what it called unfounded claims about Chinese espionage.

It said China had in recent years uncovered multiple ­Australian-instigated spy cases, acted “in accordance with the law” and moved to protect its sovereignty, security and development interests.

“Australian intelligence agencies advocated the ‘serious threat’ posed by foreign espionage activities to Australia, and even packaged themselves as innocent ‘victims’ in groundless accusations of ‘Chinese espionage threat’,” the Chinese ministry’s statement said.

“In recent years, China’s state security organs have successively cracked a number of espionage cases against China instigated by Australian intelligence agencies in accordance with the law, effectively safeguarding China’s ­sovereignty, security and development interests.”

The statement accused “some forces” in Australia of not wanting to see a healthy relationship with China and making “false ­accusations”.

The statement comes after – but did not directly reference – the arrest this month of a Chinese woman in Canberra, who has since been charged with reckless foreign interference, accused of allegedly spying on Buddhist association Guan Yin Citta for China’s Public Security Bureau.

According to a translation of the text, the statement said the language revealed Australia had “anxiety” about its own security despite being an island continent with many natural geographic advantages.

“Australia’s smear campaign against China will only lose its morality in the international community … and will do nothing to safeguard Australia’s security interests,” the translated statement said.

“Since 2009, China has been Australia’s largest trading partner … It is in Australia’s national ­interest to promote the sustained and sound development of China-Australia relations.”

The statement acknowledged that, thanks to “joint efforts”, China-Australia relations had gradually emerged from a previous low point, bringing “tangible benefits to the two peoples”.

“However, for some time now, the ‘Chinaphobia’ and ‘anti-China’ paranoia of some politicians in Australia has not improved, and they frequently take negative actions on China-related issues,” it said.

“The erroneous words and deeds run counter to the correct direction pointed out by the leaders of the two countries.”

The statement said that “as a responsible major country, China has always adhered to the concept of common, comprehensive, cooperative and sustainable ­security and promoted the ­realisation of common international security”.

“At the new beginning of the second decade of the China-­Australia comprehensive strategic partnership, the two sides should continue to enhance ­strategic mutual trust, deepen and expand mutually beneficial co-operation, broadly cultivate people-to-people friendship, jointly address risks and challenges, and provide more stability and certainty to the international community through practical security co-operation in the same direction,” it said.

The remarks appeared to seize on a recent speech by ASIO director-general Mike Burgess, in which he warned that “nation states are spying at unprecedented levels, with unprecedented sophistication.”

Mr Burgess singled out China, Russia, and Iran as three of the main sources of espionage activity, though he acknowledged that many countries were attempting to steal Australia’s secrets.

The ministry also accused Canberra of “self-dramatisation” over national security, saying its intelligence agencies were guilty of “malicious speculation” and “groundless persecution fantasies”. It said Australia was attempting to portray itself as a victim, adding it was “irrational and unprofessional”.

“This latest performance by Australia’s intelligence agencies may be an act of fetching chestnuts from the fire on behalf of others, or perhaps another forced ‘assigned essay’, but in any case it appears irrational and unprofessional,” the translated statement says.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/beijing-accuses-australia-of-fabricating-chinese-espionage-threat/news-story/e9904fcb0443500686109b047bfdd3ac

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109541

File: e5c1851e5bfeff7⋯.jpg (82.76 KB,800x480,5:3,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23470424 (160621ZAUG25) Notable: China’s MSS issues commentary article warning Australian intelligence agencies not to exaggerate their actions"The head of Australia's security intelligence agency recently delivered a speech, making unfounded claims that ‘espionage’ activities from multiple countries, including China, pose a threat to Australia… this attempt to fabricate and hype a ‘Chinese espionage threat’ reflects the unwillingness of certain forces in Australia to see a healthy and stable development of China-Australia relations… Australia is accustomed to engaging in ‘small tricks,’ frequently making baseless complaints and harboring unwarranted suspicions… Australian intelligence agencies have never been the victim… there is no factual basis or evidence to support their claims… Rumors stop with the wise, and facts speak louder than words." — The Global Times

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109540

China’s MSS issues commentary article warning Australian intelligence agencies not to exaggerate their actions

Global Times - Aug 15, 2025

China’s Ministry of State Security (MSS) issued a commentary article on Friday, warning Australian intelligence agencies not to exaggerate their actions.

The head of Australia's security intelligence agency recently delivered a speech, making unfounded claims that “espionage” activities from multiple countries, including China, pose a threat to Australia. According to the article posted on the MSS’s official WeChat account on Friday, this attempt to fabricate and hype a "Chinese espionage threat" reflects the unwillingness of certain forces in Australia to see a healthy and stable development of China-Australia relations, engaging in groundless speculation and sensationalism.

Such malicious conjecture and unfounded victim mentality not only recycle the familiar narrative of viewing China through a "gray filter," but also expose Australia's "excessive anxiety" over its own security, said the article. Australia is really overthinking it, the article said.

Australia is the only country in the world that occupies an entire continent and is one of the few sovereign nations without land neighbors, enjoying a unique geographical advantage that could allow it to focus on its own development with a detached stance. However, as one of the Five Eyes Alliance countries, Australia’s intelligence agencies often take the initiative to get involved in great-power conflicts and assist certain countries in global intelligence-gathering activities, which is off-putting and unwelcome, said the article.

In terms of relations with China, Australia is accustomed to engaging in "small tricks," frequently making baseless complaints, acting with a guilty conscience, and harbor unwarranted suspicions toward other nations. The article stated that Australia’s attempts to slander and smear China will only lead to a loss of moral standing in the international community, and will neither damage China's image as a responsible major country nor serve Australia's security interests.

Since 2009, China has been Australia's largest trading partner, top source of imports, and largest export market for 16 consecutive years, fostering the steady, healthy development of China-Australia relations, which aligns with Australia's national interests. Currently, with joint efforts, China-Australia relations have recently emerged from a low point and are on a path of recovery, bringing benefits to the peoples of both countries, the article noted.

However, for some time now, the "China-phobia" and "anti-China" paranoia of certain Australian politicians have persisted, as they frequently adopt negative actions and false rhetoric regarding China, running counter to the direction set by the leaders of both countries. In the context of further advancing and improving China-Australia relations, they continue to cling to erroneous views that demonize and stigmatize China, fueling negative narratives and sensationalizing the fictitious "Chinese espionage threat." This kind of baseless "self-dramatization" can only invite ridicule from the world, the article said.

Ironclad facts show that in the realm of international covert struggles, Australian intelligence agencies have never been the victim. In recent years, Chinese national security authorities have lawfully uncovered multiple espionage cases orchestrated by Australian intelligence agencies against China, effectively safeguarding China’s sovereignty, security, and development interests, the article said.

The Australian security intelligence agency’s hype of the "serious threat" posed by foreign espionage activities, and their unfounded accusations of a "Chinese espionage threat," serve only to portray themselves as innocent "victims." Apart from some speculative assumptions and sensationalized conjectures, there is no factual basis or evidence to support their claims. This performance may be an attempt to take advantage of others' misfortunes or a forced exercise in rhetoric, but in any case, it appears lacking in rationality and professionalism, according to the article.

Rumors stop with the wise, and facts speak louder than words, said the MSS in the article. As a responsible major country, China has consistently upheld to a security vision that is common, comprehensive, cooperative, and sustainable, working to advance of international common security, according to the MSS.

https://www.globaltimes.cn/page/202508/1340931.shtml

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109542

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23470435 (160633ZAUG25) Notable: Convicted sex offender and former Melbourne headmistress accused of sexual assault in prison — Malka Leifer, jailed for abusing students at the Addas Israel School, has allegedly assaulted a younger Aboriginal inmate in Melbourne’s maximum-security Dame Phyllis Frost Centre. The alleged incident, said to be captured on CCTV, has seen her moved to solitary confinement for 23 hours a day. Leifer was previously reported to have kissed fellow inmate and conwoman Samantha Azzopardi. Her victims, including Dassi Erlich, Nicole Meyer and Elly Sapper, said the new allegations show “she has a pattern, it doesn’t stop just because she is in prison.”

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109518

Convicted sex offender and former Melbourne headmistress accused of sexual assault in prison

Notorious former headmistress and serial rapist Malka Leifer is accused of a horrific act “on camera” inside Melbourne’s max security prison.

Rohan Smith - August 11, 2025

1/2

The former headmistress of a Melbourne school who raped her students has allegedly sexually assaulted a much younger woman inside Melbourne’s maximum security women’s prison.

Malka Leifer, 58, previously ruled over the ultra-orthodox Addas Israel School in the Melbourne suburb of Elsternwick before she was jailed for 15 years for repeated sexual abuse against students in her care.

The convicted predator sexually abused sisters Nicole Meyer, Elly Sapper and Dassi Erlich on campus, in a school office, in her home and on school camps. The dual Israeli-Australian citizen fled to Israel and remained there from 2008 until 2021 before she was extradited to Melbourne to face justice.

News.com.au earlier this year exclusively revealed that Leifer had kissed the troubled conwoman Samantha Azzopardi while locked up together inside the protection unit at the Dame Phyllis Frost Centre.

Azzopardi is best known for dressing up and posing as a vulnerable “schoolgirl” to get money from her victims.

News.com.au can now reveal that Leifer has been sent to solitary confinement at the facility in Melbourne’s north over an alleged incident involving a younger inmate — one that sources say happened in full view of “CCTV cameras”.

The incident allegedly occurred in late July inside the Murray Unit where inmates are segregated for their own protection.

A source with knowledge of the incident told news.com.au the alleged victim was “a young woman who was only recently moved to (protection) from the compound”.

“There was camera footage of it in the hallway of the Murray Unit,” the source said.

The alleged victim is believed to be a “young Koori girl” — an Aboriginal inmate in her 20s.

Leifer, who is a mother of eight children and is “disliked” in prison because she is “arrogant and entitled”, is now confined to a tiny cell for 23 hours a day where she cannot mix with other inmates.

Her only taste of freedom each day will include a 20-minute visit to the airing yard or a trip to the loungeroom where the TV does not work.

The added perks she has been accustomed to in prison, including a mircrowave and cooking equipment in her room, did not travel with her to an area of the prison referred to colloquially as “the slot”.

The Department of Justice and Victoria Police were approached for comment.

A Department of Justice spokesperson said they cannot comment on individual prisoners but “all allegations of sexual assault or violence in Victorian prisons are referred to Victoria Police for investigation”.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109543

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23470518 (160710ZAUG25) Notable: Video: More Hamas officials welcome Albanese’s recognition move, as PM warns against propaganda — Two senior Hamas figures have backed Australia’s decision to recognise Palestine, deepening criticism from the opposition that Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has emboldened terrorists. Hamas media director Ismail Al-Thawabta said recognition “reflects a growing global awareness” and urged Australia to apply “diplomatic pressure to end the Israeli occupation.” Senior Hamas official Basem Naim added that recognition needed “teeth” or the conflict would remain in a “violent vicious circle.” Albanese warned Hamas spreads propaganda and said the Arab League had united in July to demand the group be disarmed and excluded from Gaza’s governance.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109251

>>109520

>>109521

>>109528

More Hamas officials welcome Albanese’s recognition move, as PM warns against propaganda

Matthew Knott - August 14, 2025

1/2

Two senior Hamas officials have confirmed the organisation welcomes Australia’s decision to recognise a Palestinian state, as Opposition Leader Sussan Ley doubled down in her criticism of Prime Minister Anthony Albanese for being praised by a listed terrorist group.

But Albanese hit back, citing a post in a Hamas Telegram channel disavowing an earlier statement from the group celebrating Australia’s move to recognise a Palestinian state, and told media outlets on Thursday not to promote propaganda from the militant organisation.

Hamas media director Ismail Al-Thawabta used similar language to that of the office of jailed senior Hamas official Hassan Yousef, which provided a statement praising the recognition decision to this masthead on Tuesday.

“We welcome Australia’s decision to recognise the State of Palestine, and consider it a positive step towards the legitimate rights of the Palestinian people,” Al-Thawabta told the ABC.

A statement on a Telegram channel in Hamas’ name on Thursday had disavowed comments attributed to Yousef in this masthead on Wednesday, saying that he had been “held in poor detention conditions, cut off from the outside world, and has no means of communication with any local or international press outlets”.

The original comments were provided by Yousef’s office in Beitunia, a town near Ramallah in the occupied West Bank, which issues statements on his behalf.

Contacted on Thursday, a spokesperson for the office confirmed it had released the statement and that Youssef was still in jail, but said he was expected to be released soon.

With many of its top leaders killed and imprisoned in recent years, and with surviving officials scattered throughout multiple countries, Hamas’ communications can be unco-ordinated and at times contradictory. The group has more and less radical elements, and engages in information warfare to help achieve its military aims.

Al-Thawabta, who is based in Gaza, said in his comments originally provided to the ABC that Australia’s move to recognise a Palestinian state “reflects a growing global awareness of the necessity to end the injustice suffered by our people for decades”.

“We call on the Australian government to translate this recognition into concrete actions — by exerting diplomatic pressure to end the Israeli occupation.”

Al-Thawabta added that “while recognition has come late”, the move was “better late than never”.

Albanese on Monday confirmed that Australia would recognise a state of Palestine at the United Nations next month, following similar moves from France, the United Kingdom and Canada in an international push to revive momentum for a two-state solution.

Albanese told Channel Seven’s Sunrise earlier this week: “Hamas will be totally opposed to this decision. Hamas don’t support two states, they support one state.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109544

File: 65b534d2cfac6b2⋯.jpg (645.83 KB,2048x1366,1024:683,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 5dd956c864923e3⋯.jpg (929.54 KB,2064x1376,3:2,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23470656 (160741ZAUG25) Notable: Warning from Washington: Speak out about Chinese threat or risk AUKUS subs — US figures have warned Australia must be more explicit about China’s military threat or risk the AUKUS submarine pact. John Bolton said Labor was “less vocal” than past governments, while naval expert Bryan Clark argued Australia was “reticent to explicitly call out” using the subs against China. Alexander Gray added that Australia’s shifting rhetoric caused “discomfort” in Washington. Penny Wong’s office rejected the criticism, saying Australia had been “clear and consistent” on China, and stressed AUKUS strengthened regional peace.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109299

>>109316

>>109512

>>109347

Warning from Washington: Speak out about Chinese threat or risk AUKUS subs

Michael Koziol - August 14, 2025

1/2

Washington: Australia must speak more clearly about the threats posed by China, including how it would respond to a regional conflict, or risk the AUKUS submarine agreement, Indo-Pacific experts in the United States are warning.

John Bolton, who served as Donald Trump’s national security adviser in his first term, and held senior roles in other Republican administrations, said policymakers in Washington had noted the Albanese government was “less vocal about what the problem is” compared with its predecessors.

“It is a little hard to get used to,” Bolton said in an interview. “In the Cold War days, Labour governments in Great Britain were just as anti-communist as the Conservatives. When you see a leftist government that’s not willing to talk as openly about what the real threat is, it does make some people nervous.

“I would be less than fully candid if I said it didn’t make me a little nervous. Why the hell are we worried about talking about what the threat is? The struggle is on, and we ought to be candid about it.”

Naval operations expert Bryan Clark, a senior fellow at the conservative Hudson Institute with close links to the administration, said the AUKUS review was about putting Australia on notice that the US expected Australia to use the submarines it bought.

“The Australians have been a little reticent to explicitly call out that they might use them against China,” he told this masthead. “If you’re not willing to say it in public, then you’re not going to put the Chinese on notice. It has been privately conveyed in the past, but the US would like Australia to make it more public.”

Clark noted – as have other prominent defence experts in Washington – that AUKUS represented a significant portion of the Australian defence budget, especially at the current level of defence spending.

“That’s the concern in the US – that you’re spending 10 to 20 per cent of your procurement budget on this one system, yet you’re not talking about how you might use it,” he said.

Referring to the Pentagon, he said: “There’s definitely some questions on their part about why isn’t Australia being more straightforward about why they are buying these submarines.”

The reluctance to be more explicit made people in the administration believe that “short of a direct attack on Australia, these submarines are probably not going to be in the mix”, Clark said.

Alexander Gray, who was National Security Council chief of staff during Trump’s first term and is now at the Atlantic Council, said the American perception was that Labor had eased its rhetoric on China compared to the Morrison or Turnbull governments.

“You see what looks like a consensus among DFAT [Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade] and Department of Defence folks in Australia – bureaucrats, experts – on the China threat, but the language that comes from politicians is much more dependent on who’s in power,” Gray said.

“I think there’s a little bit of discomfort in our system with a China narrative that can so easily change based on who’s in power. That type of strategic clarity, even if it’s not spoken directly, is going to be an evolving American expectation as we go forward with AUKUS.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109545

File: 4efc3befc6bc5f1⋯.jpg (871.39 KB,1843x1037,1843:1037,Clipboard.jpg)

File: cefebff5b3a02aa⋯.jpg (440.98 KB,847x1129,847:1129,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23470712 (160753ZAUG25) Notable: No free ride in defence of free world, Pentagon tells Indo-Pacific — The Pentagon has warned Australia and Japan must lift defence spending to NATO’s 5 per cent of GDP benchmark or risk undermining AUKUS and collective deterrence against China. US officials said Canberra was not spending enough “even for Pillar 1” of AUKUS and urged allies to “step up” ahead of a critical 2027 window when Beijing could seize Taiwan. Defence Minister Richard Marles insisted AUKUS remained secure, citing US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth’s backing, despite policy chief Elbridge Colby’s scepticism.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109299

>>109316

>>109405

>>109512

No free ride in defence of free world, Pentagon tells Indo-Pacific

US Defence chiefs demand Australia match European NATO spending levels of 5pc of GDP as China threat looms ahead of critical 2027 deadline.

JOE KELLY - August 13, 2025

1/2

The US Defence Department is aiming to integrate Australia and other Asian allies into a stronger collective defence framework focused on deterring Beijing and safeguarding Taiwan, warning that partners in the Indo-Pacific must not “sit back while the ­Europeans are stepping up”.

As Canberra and Washington prepare to mark the 80th anniversary of the end of World War II on Friday, the Pentagon has made clear its plans to strengthen ­collective defence as an urgent priority in the lead-up to 2027, when it is thought China will be capable of seizing Taiwan.

It can also be revealed that ­Anthony Albanese’s Curtin Oration last month raised questions among senior figures in the Trump administration.

In the address, the Prime Minister praised Labor’s wartime leader John Curtin for standing up to UK prime minister Winston Churchill and US president Franklin Roosevelt during World War II – a jarring message in Washington, given its reassessment of AUKUS and the push for Australia to lift defence spending.

Defence officials in Washington said they did not believe ­Australia was spending enough “even for Pillar 1” of the AUKUS deal, under which the US has agreed to provide at least three nuclear-powered Virginia-class submarines to Canberra from the early 2030s.

“Our allies have to do their part,” a US Defence official told The Australian. “We’re coming up to the 80th anniversary of the end of World War II. The lesson to take in commemorating the end of the war in the Pacific is the need for real efforts and readiness for collective defence.

“All countries have political difficulties. All countries have fiscal difficulties. All countries have constitutional restrictions. Yet we have to be able to defend ourselves in ways that are realistic, equitable and sustainable.”

The key priorities of the US Defence Department were given as defending the homeland, deterring China, revitalising the defence industrial base and “getting the allies to do more in order to pick up slack”.

The Australian was told that the ongoing AUKUS review was “designed to be fact-based, rigorous, and empirical”.

It will include Pillar 1, which ­relates to ­provision of the ­Virginia-class – and later the AUKUS-class – nuclear-powered submarines to Australia, as well as Pillar 2, which relates to the ­sharing of advanced defence ­technologies.

“I think the main thrust of the review is to give people a real brass-tacks, clear-eyed understanding of where things stand,” a US Defence official said.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109546

File: 88153d9a7fc7b25⋯.jpg (628.8 KB,1843x1037,1843:1037,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 58108d5317c3a0e⋯.jpg (1.36 MB,1800x1200,3:2,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23470744 (160803ZAUG25) Notable: Brisbane the best stage for Australia’s first Quad summit, says Anthony Albanese — Anthony Albanese has backed Queensland Premier David Crisafulli’s bid for Brisbane to host the 2026 Quad Leaders’ Summit, calling it a “great” chance to showcase the city ahead of the 2032 Olympics. Albanese said he would “make sure” the meeting of Australia, the US, Japan and India takes place in Queensland, amid doubts over this year’s planned summit in New Delhi. Crisafulli said bipartisan support was “heartening” as he prepares to lobby Narendra Modi and Shigeru Ishiba later this month.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109532

Brisbane the best stage for Australia’s first Quad summit, says Anthony Albanese

MACKENZIE SCOTT - August 13, 2025

Anthony Albanese has endorsed Queensland’s pitch for Brisbane to host the powerful Quad Leaders’ Summit next year, saying it would be a “great” opportunity to put the city on the international stage ahead of the 2032 Olympic Games.

The Prime Minister on Wednesday threw his support behind Queensland Premier David Crisafulli’s bid to secure Australia’s first meeting of the reformed Quad, which the state leader has also been selling in separate communications to ­Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba in recent months.

The move comes as the first-term Premier works to repair relations between the key business partners, which were tested by the former Labor government.

Mr Albanese said he would work closely with Mr Crisafulli to “make sure” the meeting takes place in Queensland.

“In the lead up to Brisbane 2032, it is an opportunity to showcase this great global city to the world,” Mr Albanese said in Brisbane.

“Hosting of a Quad that brings together Australia, the United States, Japan and India, for major economies, will, of course, be a major international event.

“It attracts thousands of people, not just the four leaders, but it also attracts great international attention.”

The request comes as doubts remain over the next planned Indo-Pacific security meeting in New Delhi this year, due to disagreements between Mr Modi and US President Donald Trump over tariffs and geopolitical matters.

No date has been set, although the meeting dialogue may be held as early as September.

Queensland’s bid to host the summit is in part to repair the state’s business relationships with some of the region’s largest economic players after policies of the previous government created tensions with big business.

Indian conglomerate Adani’s proposed coalmine was accused by the country’s business leaders of being politicised in 2017.

Later, the Palaszczuk government’s decision to hike coal royalties without warning in 2022 was labelled as insulting by then-Japanese ambassador Shingo Yamagami, who urged the government to reconsider.

Mr Crisafulli said Mr Albanese’s bipartisan support was “heartening” ahead of this planned overseas delegation at the end of August. He first raised the idea of hosting the Quad publicly in July.

“We are in lock-step and I intend to take that pitch directly to business and political leaders in India and Japan later this month,” he said.

“I’m serious about securing the extraordinary opportunities our major trading partners can provide for communities right across our state as we push our way on to the world stage.

“We’re on the doorstep of something very special in this state, and I believe if we can get Queensland to be the Q in the Quad, it will better protect our lifestyle through a stronger economy.”

The two leaders, both of Italian heritage, have previously boasted about their strong relationship and “cannoli diplomacy”.

A report released last month revealed the Olympic and Paralympic Games are expected to drive a $71bn boost in Queensland’s gross domestic product in the two decades following the month-long sporting event if the government invests in driving economic reform.

Southeast Queensland alone could generate $40m in extra gross regional project.

Construction is yet to begin on major venues of the Games, including the centrepiece 63,000-seat stadium at Brisbane’s Victoria Park.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/brisbane-the-best-stage-for-australias-first-quad-summit-says-anthony-albanese/news-story/aad42582d02b625d3dfd4c1b57b3ac51

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109547

File: ffd28b409479a76⋯.jpg (1.3 MB,2016x1512,4:3,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 926fc657a6de44c⋯.jpg (2.26 MB,2500x1875,4:3,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23470811 (160823ZAUG25) Notable: Australia and Vanuatu agree to $500m deal, but details remain scarce — Australia and Vanuatu have “initialled” the landmark Nakamal Agreement on Mount Yasur, with Canberra pledging about $500m over a decade for climate resilience, infrastructure, security and labour mobility. Deputy PM Richard Marles said the pact reflects a “shared destiny,” while Vanuatu PM Jotham Napat called it a “win-win.” Visa-free travel, demanded by Napat, remains unresolved, with Australia offering only to discuss easing requirements. Analysts say the deal strengthens Australia’s position against China’s growing influence in Vanuatu.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Australia and Vanuatu agree to $500m deal, but details remain scarce

Stephen Dziedzic and Lillyrose Welwel - 13 August 2025

1/2

Senior ministers from Australia and Vanuatu have trooped to the top of an active volcano on the island of Tanna for a ceremony to celebrate a major new pact between the two countries.

Foreign Minister Penny Wong, Deputy Prime Minister Richard Marles and Pacific Minister Pat Conroy joined their counterparts from Vanuatu on the top of Mount Yasur to "initial" the landmark Nakamal Agreement ahead of formal signature by prime ministers next month.

Australia is set to funnel some $500 million into Vanuatu over a decade under the pact, which will supplant a bilateral security agreement that was effectively scrapped by the Pacific nation after it was signed in 2022.

While most of the details in the agreement are not yet public, Australia has labelled it "transformational", and Mr Marles says it reflects the two nations have a "shared destiny".

"What this agreement really does is, for the first time, acknowledge what has always been the truth, and that is that as two nations, we are family and that our future is very much bound together," Mr Marles said.

The Prime Minister of Vanuatu Jotham Napat declared the deal a "win-win" for both countries.

"The agreement that has entered today will transpire into a lot of great benefits between the two countries, whether it be the security agreement, economic transformation, with some specific focus on the mobile labour mobility and financial support," Mr Napat told journalists in Tanna.

Under the agreement, Australia is expected to funnel funding into a host of areas, including climate resilience, key infrastructure, security support, labour mobility and budget support.

There were some last-minute negotiations to secure an in-principle agreement ahead of the ministers' arrival, with officials from Vanuatu telling the ABC that both sides had to make some late concessions in order to secure the pact.

Mr Marles would not be drawn on exactly what financial commitments Australia had made, but said the Nakamal Agreement "acknowledges our shared economic connection".

He added it "makes clear that it is core business for Australia to be engaged in the human development of Vanuatu".

It is also not clear if the arrangement will make it easier for Ni-Vanuatu to travel to Australia.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109548

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23470848 (160837ZAUG25) Notable: Video: Jacinta Allan blasts concerns over gender-clinic pipeline in schools — Victorian Premier Jacinta Allan has dismissed as “disgraceful nonsense” claims of a “school-to-gender-clinic pipeline,” backing the state’s Respectful Relationships curriculum, which now teaches children as young as five that body parts may not match gender and allows biologically male students who identify as female to play on girls’ teams. Critics, citing the Cass review in the UK, warn of weak evidence for puberty blockers and hormones, while psychiatrists argue the model risks misdiagnosis. Allan said schools must support transgender students, who face far higher suicide risks.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>73621 (pb)

>>109282

>>109499

Jacinta Allan blasts concerns over gender-clinic pipeline in schools

RACHEL BAXENDALE - August 13, 2025

1/2

Jacinta Allan has dismissed as “disgraceful nonsense” the view of the mother of a gender dysphoric child that there is a “school to gender clinic pipeline” in Victoria, and backed the state’s “Respectful Relationships” curriculum.

The Australian revealed on Thursday Victoria’s curriculum has been ­updated to teach children as young as five that their body parts may not match their gender, and that biologically male students who identify as female are entitled to play sport on girls’ teams.

Concern over the “Respectful Relationships” curriculum, which was quietly amended in August last year, comes as parents and psychiatrists warn of a “school-to-clinic pipeline” for children struggling with adolescence who are persuaded they were born in the wrong body, and pushed towards irreversible and often harmful medical treatment.

Responding to the report on Thursday, the Victorian Premier said Respectful Relationships had been expanded “in response to the ongoing perpetration of violence against women” and “the ongoing rise of the number of kids who are bullied”.

“I have seen first hand how important the respectful relationships program is because it’s in my kids’ school, and so yes, I back the respectful relationships program and the curriculum, that is all about protecting kids, strengthening resilience of kids, and supporting kids to be who they are across our schools, to help other kids understand why respecting difference is so important,” Ms Allan said.

“This ongoing campaign against the respectful relationships by The Australian speaks about, does not recognise the transformative difference this program is making every single day in schools.”

Asked to respond to the view of a spokeswoman for Parents of Adolescents with Gender Distress that the policy at Victorian schools of affirming children’s chosen genders is ­resulting in a “school to clinic pipeline” towards irreversible medical treatment, Ms Allan said the view was “just nonsense”.

“It’s disgraceful, nonsense. Like, seriously, this sort of ongoing attack on a program that is making a difference in kids’ lives, just should be stopped,” she said.

“It should be stopped. It’s disgraceful reporting. It’s hurtful. When you consider the incidents, that transgender kids are 15 times more likely to kill themselves, we should be supporting them.

“We should be supporting them across our schools, across our society, across our community. The Australian needs to stop this ongoing campaign, because it’s hurtful and harmful.”

The gender-affirming care model has been abandoned in a number of overseas jurisdictions, including the UK, where an independent review by pediatrician Hilary Cass last year concluded that the evidence base for medical interventions such as puberty blockers and cross-sex hormones was “remarkably weak”.

Asked, in light of the Cass review, why Victoria is persisting with the gender affirming care model, Ms Allan did not engage with the finding of the review.

“Perhaps I was not clear enough in my previous answer. I’ll repeat again, transgender kids are 15 times more likely to kill themselves,” the Premier said.

“So whether it’s across our schooling system or across our health system, supporting those kids and supporting those families should be a priority because it’s the right thing to do.

“What’s not right, what’s not right is this ongoing campaign to tear down programs that are about strengthening kids’ resilience. It’s about preventing bullying. It’s about protecting kids against future harm.”

Initiated in 2016 as a response to Victoria’s family violence royal commission, Respectful Relationships is a teaching resource ­designed by the state Education Department with the aim of ­“preventing family violence by promoting gender equality and teaching children about respectful relationships”.

The revised curriculum for “foundation level” – children in the first year of primary school – includes a case study of a transgender girl called “Stacey”.

“She dresses like the other girls, plays with them and everything seems fine,” the sample lesson plan states. “But one day, Lara says Stacey should be in the boys’ team at sports, not the girls’ team.”

They are advised to tell their students that “Stacey” could respond by saying: “Yes I can play with the girls’ team because I am a girl!”, or “Go and ask the teacher if you don’t believe me. Our teacher says I belong in the girls team.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109549

File: 8494e5c1b098c07⋯.jpg (215.33 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: c53f262c8f6aac7⋯.jpg (181.83 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23470875 (160848ZAUG25) Notable: Parents of gender dysphoric kids hit back at Jacinta Allan — Parents representing more than 50 Victorian families have written to Premier Jacinta Allan after she dismissed warnings of a “school to gender clinic pipeline” as “disgraceful nonsense.” The group, Parents of Adolescents with Gender Distress, challenged Allan’s claim that transgender children are “15 times more likely” to commit suicide, accusing her of using “alarmist and irresponsible” figures without reliable data. They argued the Respectful Relationships curriculum is pushing children toward harmful medicalisation and requested a meeting to share lived experiences, after being refused access to Education Minister Ben Carroll.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>73621 (pb)

>>109282

>>109499

>>109548

Parents of gender dysphoric kids hit back at Jacinta Allan

'RACHEL BAXENDALE - August 14, 2025

A group representing more than 50 Victorian parents of children with gender dysphoria has hit back at Jacinta Allan after she dismissed the views of one as “disgraceful nonsense”, writing to the Premier to ask that she meet them to hear their concerns.

Parents of Adolescents with Gender Distress has also taken issue with Ms Allan’s assertion that transgender children are 15 times more likely to commit ­suicide than their peers, accusing her of citing inaccurate data and making “alarmist and irresponsible” claims.

The Australian revealed on Thursday Victoria’s curriculum had been ­updated to teach children as young as five that their body parts may not match their gender, and biologically male students who identify as female are entitled to play sport on girls’ teams.

Concern over the Respectful Relationships curriculum pro­mpt­ed a spokeswoman from PAGD to warn of a “school to gender clinic pipeline”, arguing children struggling with adolescence are being persuaded they were born in the wrong body and pushed towards irreversible and often harmful medical treatment.

Asked to respond to the views of the spokeswoman, whom The Australian has agreed not to name to protect her child’s privacy, Ms Allan said the notion of a “school to clinic pipeline” was “nonsense”.

“It’s disgraceful nonsense. Like, seriously, this sort of ongoing attack on a program that is making a difference in kids’ lives just should be stopped,” she said.

“It should be stopped. It’s disgraceful reporting. It’s hurtful. When you consider the incidence, that transgender kids are 15 times more likely to kill themselves, we should be supporting them,” the Premier said.

In a letter sent to Ms Allan on Thursday afternoon, PAGD sought a meeting with the Premier in light of her “recent dismissive comments concerning the operation of the Respectful Relationships program and its impact on our gender distressed children”.

“We would welcome the opportunity to discuss our concerns and lived experience with you,” PAGD wrote, adding they have been seeking meetings with Education Minister Ben Carroll and his departmental secretary for more than a year, “and they have refused to engage with us”.

“You made the alarming suggestion of a 15 times higher rate of suicide amongst transgender children. We believe this figure comes from survey data and concerned thoughts of suicide rather than completed suicide,” the parents wrote.

The data Ms Allan referenced appears to come from the website of advocacy group LGBTIQ+ Health Australia, which did not cite its source. The Australian Institute of Health and Welfare website states “there are … no reliable ­national data on rates of suicide and self-harm among LGBTIQ+ communities in Australia”.

Data from the world’s largest gender clinic, the UK’s Tavistock Clinic, shows that rates of suicide amongst youth referred to the clinic were slightly higher than the general population, and the same amongst those receiving treatment and those who were not.

Pediatrician Hilary Cass’s comprehensive independent review of gender identity services for children in the UK last year found that “the evidence does not adequately support the claim that gender affirming treatment reduces suicide risk”.

PAGD said Ms Allan’s remarks were “especially concerning considering experts caution against alarmist and irresponsible claims of suicide, particularly, as is the case here, when it’s not backed up by data”.

“Data shows suicide rates for transgender youth, while elevated, remain extremely low, and as many also suffer from co-occurring conditions (ASD (autism spec­trum disorder), eating disorders, anxiety) which have similar levels of risk, a direct correlation can’t be made,” the parents wrote.

“Neither affirmation nor medicalisation impacts this suicide risk or suicidal ideation and there is no evidence that programs introducing unevidenced concepts of ‘gender identity’ are beneficial to the mental health of children or ­adolescents.

“We believe these programs which invite children to question their sex, and therefore their comfort in their own bodies, based on stereotypes, create unnecessary anxiety and confusion, particularly for gender-nonconforming or neurodiverse children.

“We hope that in the spirit of inclusivity you could meet with us to hear our personal stories.”

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/parents-of-gender-dysphoric-kids-hit-back-at-jacinta-allan/news-story/ac8c7932c4cf77c80953dc767b02f346

https://x.com/pagd_vic

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109550

File: 8009a087a364617⋯.jpg (161.76 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: fe94272e5b2a303⋯.jpg (298.73 KB,2048x1536,4:3,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23470911 (160903ZAUG25) Notable: COMMENTARY: Why amplifying suicide risk cynically inflames transgender row"Victoria’s Premier, Jacinta Allan, is right about the risk of harm and wrong about the cause… Media scrutiny of social transition in schools is perfectly legitimate… If Allan wishes to prevent harm, she should stop the suicide scare campaign… Like politicians, journalists are supposed to follow mental health advice not to harp on the suicide risk of a particular group… The “transition or suicide” claim is a feature, not a bug, of the “gender-affirming” treatment model… The clearest study so far hails from Finland… suicide risk was driven not by gender distress but by the accompanying psychiatric problems." — Bernard Lane, writer of Gender Clinic News, The Australian

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>73621 (pb)

>>109282

>>109548

>>109549

COMMENTARY: Why amplifying suicide risk cynically inflames transgender row

BERNARD LANE - August 15, 2025

Victoria’s Premier, Jacinta Allan, is right about the risk of harm and wrong about the cause (“Jacinta Allan blasts concerns over gender-clinic pipeline in schools”, 14/8).

Media scrutiny of social transition in schools is perfectly legitimate. Social transition – where adults reinforce a child’s alienation from his or her immutable birth sex – is akin to a clinical intervention with potentially lifelong effects. Parents should know about this. Canadian psychologist Ken Zucker, an international authority on gender dysphoria, argues that early social transition makes it more likely the child will go down the path of gender medicalisation, starting with puberty blockers.

If Allan wishes to prevent harm, she should stop the suicide scare campaign. Unable or unwilling to discuss social transition, she protested twice that “transgender kids are 15 times more likely to kill themselves”. Like politicians, journalists are supposed to follow mental health advice not to harp on the suicide risk of a particular group, nor to catastrophise or oversimplify the possible causes of suicide. Social contagion of suicide is a distinct possibility.

Allan is not alone in ignoring this danger. The “transition or suicide” claim is a feature, not a bug, of the “gender-affirming” treatment model championed by Victoria’s Labor government. Parents hesitant about signing off on blockers, hormones or a mastectomy for their child have been told to choose between a “dead daughter or a trans son”.

Why do suicide prevention experts remain silent when the “trans suicide narrative” is irresponsibly used to promote experimental medical treatments and to silence dissent?

Alarming statistics of the kind invoked by Allan typically come from low-quality, anonymous online surveys with no follow-up to verify the answers.

The resulting headlines reinforce the stereotype of vulnerability, which is likely to amplify responses to the next survey. Thoughts of suicide, distressing but not so unusual, are glibly conflated with actual suicide attempts. Activists seem untroubled by the possibility that suicide may become a self-fulfilling prophecy.

Thankfully, it appears suicide among patients of pediatric gender clinics is rare and, in some cases, it follows treatment offered as “life-saving”. A study of the UK Tavistock clinic found four patients over 10 years known or suspected to have died by suicide out of a total of 15,000.

Zucker is among the clinicians who believe that although gender-dysphoria patients do have an elevated suicide risk compared to the general population, it is comparable to the risk of the wider group of young people with mental health problems. Clinicians are used to managing the suicide risk of depression; nobody expects a politician to recklessly publicise exaggerated risks in this context.

But Allan seems to think that deploying the term “transgender kids” marks the end of inquiry, not the start. The surge in young people identifying as the opposite sex or “non-binary” is complicated by disproportionate rates of mental health issues, autism and ADHD, as well as awkward same-sex attraction and, in some cases, past sexual abuse. What is it exactly that causes the suicide risk?

The clearest study so far hails from Finland, where researchers concluded suicide risk was driven not by gender distress but by the accompanying psychiatric problems. And the risk was not reduced by the hormonal or surgical treatments of gender medicine, a finding repeated by England’s historic Cass Review.

In 2020, Finland led the European shift away from the medicalised gender-affirming model. This more cautious therapeutic approach insists on an open-minded exploration of all the difficulties of a gender-distressed child, with priority treatment of any mental health disorders. To truly help these young people, it’s necessary to look beyond the “trans kids” slogan.

Bernard Lane, a former journalist with The Australian, writes Gender Clinic News.

'''If you or someone you know is at risk of suicide, call Lifeline (13 11 14), the Suicide Call Back Service (1300 659 467) or Beyond Blue (1300 224 636).

https://www.lifeline.org.au/

https://www.suicidecallbackservice.org.au/

https://www.beyondblue.org.au/

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/commentary/why-amplifying-suicide-risk-cynically-inflames-transgender-row/news-story/56e60a2e59cd15d14da16df0f23060e2

https://www.genderclinicnews.com/

https://qresear.ch/?q=Bernard+Lane

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109551

File: 96113aa8b92082e⋯.jpg (79.27 KB,1024x768,4:3,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23470925 (160913ZAUG25) Notable: Finnish doctor Riittakerttu Kaltiala argues case for science in teen gender dysphoria care — Finnish psychiatrist Riittakerttu Kaltiala, who leads a national gender identity service in Finland, has warned that early medical interventions such as puberty blockers have shown “very weak” evidence of benefit and often failed to improve outcomes. She said most patients were teenage girls with “a long history of severe psychiatric issues” rather than lifelong dysphoria, and many did not thrive on hormone treatment. Finland’s cautious guidelines now stress psychosocial support and psychiatric care before any intervention. Kaltiala will present her findings in Adelaide at the Gender Healthcare Summit in October.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>73621(pb)

>>109282

>>109548

>>109549

Finnish doctor Riittakerttu Kaltiala argues case for science in teen gender dysphoria care

DAVID PENBERTHY - 15 August 2025

1/3

Finnish psychiatrist Riittakerttu Kaltiala holds a unique and important position in the treatment of gender dysphoria. She has had a front-row seat for the introduction and subsequent rollback of gender-affirming care in her native Finland across the past 15 years.

She has done so not from the position of activist or ideologue but as a medical professional concerned with patient care, who believes she has a medical duty to call out practices that are failing to improve the lot of the unwell.

This is the conclusion she drew about the gender-affirming care treatments that were introduced for adolescents in Finland after 2010 but that have been wound back, so medical intervention and the use of puberty blockers now occur only in rarer cases where alternative treatments for perceived gender dysphoria prove ineffective.

Kaltiala is professor of adolescent psychiatry at Finland’s Tampere University and chief psychiatrist in the department of adolescent psychiatry at Tampere University Hospital. She also has been the leader of one of the two nationally centralised gender identity services for minors in Finland since 2011, when the services were first opened.

She will be a keynote speaker at the Coalition for Advancing Scientific Care Gender Healthcare Summit in Adelaide in October.

Ahead of her visit she spoke to The Australian about how Finland made its own transition away from a world where transitioning was being touted as the default option for troubled adolescents.

“In Finland, until 2010, medical gender reassignment and gender assessments and interventions were only available for legal adults,” Kaltiala says.

“Discussion started in society about whether this was a problem, whether it was aged-based discrimination that minors could not access these assessments.

“It was decided there must be a gender identity service for adolescents as well. It was decided that in adolescent psychiatry we had to provide this service for minors. So I was given this task and of course I set about to organise our team and we familiarised ourselves with the literature and we contacted other services that had been providing gender identity services for gender dysphoria.”

Kaltiala says that in the early 2010s what’s known as the Dutch model of care – early intervention with puberty blockers – was just emerging as the preferred treatment for younger people found to have gender dysphoria. She and her colleagues spoke with gender treatment clinics in Amsterdam, London and Stockholm, all of which were working in accordance with the Dutch protocols, and prepared to work along the same lines.

“The literature assumed that young people with lifelong gender dysphoria or cross-gender identification would find the onset of puberty stressful as they are developing undesired sex characteristics,” she says.

“The thinking was that this would risk the development of mental health issues as well.

“But when the patients started coming in they were nothing like they had been described in the literature. Given the small size of the population here in Finland we were only expecting a small number of patients. We were expecting they would predominantly have male sex. We also expected they would have only mild mental health issues.

“But actually, to our surprise, the patients were mainly biologically female, they presented well after puberty at an average of 16 years old, they had the onset of feelings of gender dysphoria well after the onset of puberty.

“Many of them, around two-thirds of them, had a long history of psychiatric need and psychiatric treatment. A long history of severe psychiatric issues, which predated any sense of gender dysphoria.

“So what was this about? We were very confused. Nevertheless, and especially because this was a new field, we made a very thorough assessment of all the patients and tried to make sure their feelings of identifying with the opposite sex would indicate a permanent and stable achieved identity rather than just being a phase of adolescent development.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109552

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23470963 (160944ZAUG25) Notable: Video: Pro-trans rights protesters, police clash in the Melbourne CBD countering ‘Women Will Speak’ rally — Four arrests were made after about 80 pro-trans rights activists clashed with police during a counter-protest in Melbourne’s CBD. Police said three officers were injured but not hospitalised, with pepper spray deployed and one man charged after allegedly striking an officer with an umbrella. Protesters blocked cameras with umbrellas and harassed media. At Parliament, around 40 “Women Will Speak” attendees criticised anti-vilification laws and gender identity policies, with speakers warning women’s sex-based rights were being eroded. Police conducted 145 searches and ordered 50 protestors to remove face coverings.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>73621 (pb)

>>109282

>>109548

>>109549

Pro-trans rights protesters, police clash in the Melbourne CBD countering ‘Women Will Speak’ rally

JOANNA PANAGOPOULOS - 16 August 2025

Victoria police have arrested four people as a group of pro-trans rights activists and police officers clashed in Melbourne’s CBD.

Three police officers were injured but did not require hospitalisation, police said.

About 80 pro-trans rights activists marched through the CBD on Saturday in counter-protest of a planned women’s rights rally at Parliament House over the Allan government’s new anti-vilification laws and women’s based sex rights.

The ‘Women Will Speak’ rally was organised by Women’s Voices Australia, and followed a similar protest in April.

The pro-trans rights protestors arrived about 11am, many dressed in black and with their faces covered.

Footage, taken by the Herald Sun, showed a group of the activists with face coverings clashing with police on Spring St towards Carlton Gardens. A number of were taken to the ground by police.

Four people were arrested.

“OC spray was deployed, and a 21-year-old Flemington man was arrested after he allegedly struck a police officer with an umbrella at the intersection of Russell and Lonsdale Streets just before 11.30am,” police said in a statement. The man was charged with assault.

A 19-year-old Wallington woman and a 27-year-old man from Coburg were arrested after allegedly being in possession of flares, and a 33-year-old Oakleigh South man was arrested for failing to move on. All are expected to be charged on summons.

A number used umbrellas to block the view of TV cameras and harassed media, the Herald Sun reported.

Police said three police officers were injured, but none required hospitalisation.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109553

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23470973 (160952ZAUG25) Notable: Video: Four arrested as pro-trans protesters clash with police — Four people were arrested after clashes between pro-trans rights protesters and police in Melbourne’s CBD. About 80 activists confronted a women’s rights rally at Parliament House before being pushed by police towards Carlton Gardens, where they chanted “trans liberation, not assimilation” and “all cops are Nazis.” A 21-year-old man was charged with assaulting police after allegedly striking an officer with an umbrella, while pepper spray was deployed and flares set off. Others were arrested for possessing flares and failing to move on. The women’s rally, attended by about 50 people, ended peacefully under heavy police presence.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>73621 (pb)

>>109282

>>109548

>>109549

Four arrested as pro-trans protesters clash with police

Ashleigh McMillan - August 16, 2025

1/2

Four people have been arrested after scuffles broke out between pro-trans rights protesters and police officers on Saturday morning in Melbourne’s CBD.

About 80 pro-trans demonstrators arrived at Parliament House at 11am to counter a women’s rights rally taking place on the steps.

The counter-protest was pushed away from Parliament House as the Women Will Speak rally began, and moved towards Carlton Gardens.

Walking back through the CBD, pro-trans protesters yelled slogans including “trans liberation, not assimilation” and “all cops are Nazis”.

A 21-year-old Flemington man was arrested after he allegedly struck a police officer with an umbrella at the corner of Russell and Lonsdale streets about 11.30am. He was charged with assaulting police and was bailed.

Protesters and a police officer were hit with oleoresin capsicum spray as flares were set off.

The pro-trans group then walked back to Parliament House, where they were met with a large line of police officers. An officer, talking on a loudspeaker, told them not to approach the line.

At the corner of Albert and Gisborne streets, police approached a woman they believed had thrown a flare earlier and asked others to remove their masks. As police tried to arrest the woman, other protesters grabbed her and tried to pull her pack into the larger protest group. People were forced to the ground, unmasked and arrested.

A 19-year-old Wallington woman and a 27-year-old Coburg man were arrested for allegedly possessing flares and are expected to be charged on summons. A 33-year-old man from Oakleigh South was arrested for failing to move on and is also expected to be charged on summons.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109554

File: 669eb658d964df1⋯.jpg (329.7 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 5a487a48aa94a3f⋯.jpg (339.16 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 6abf9b81ca7ff09⋯.jpg (414.2 KB,1536x2047,1536:2047,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23476554 (180907ZAUG25) Notable: ‘Sanction China’ plea from Hong Kong activist granted asylum, Ted Hui — Hong Kong pro-democracy activist Ted Hui, now granted asylum in Australia, has urged the Albanese government to impose Magnitsky-style sanctions on Hong Kong officials responsible for human rights abuses, including the 10-year jailing of Australian Gordon Ng. While praising his family’s new security, Hui said Canberra has shown “much greater attention” to Cheng Lei and Yang Hengjun, and asked why Ng has not received the same focus. He noted Hong Kong police have placed bounties on him and lawyer Kevin Yam, and said US-style sanctions would limit officials’ global reach.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109321

>>109337

>>109397

>>109428

‘Sanction China’ plea from Hong Kong activist granted asylum, Ted Hui

STEPHEN RICE - August 17, 2025

Hong Kong pro-democracy activist Ted Hui Chi-fung has pleaded with the Albanese government to impose sanctions on Hong Kong officials responsible for human rights abuses, including the 10-year jail sentence imposed on Australian Gordon Ng.

While expressing gratitude at being granted political asylum last week to remain in Australia, Mr Hui urged stronger action to free Mr Ng and other Hong Kong activists.

“There’s a lot of room for the Australian government to speak up a lot more and more strongly, and also for actions like putting sanctions over Hong Kong officials who infringe human rights in Hong Kong,” the now-Adelaide-based lawyer said.

“I’ve been making that request consistently over the years – I say that to (Foreign Minister) Penny Wong whenever I see her,” Mr Hui told The Australian. “I understand it’s complicated, but I think it’s about time to do it, because they spend a very long time in jail just for defending democratic rights.”

Mr Hui noted the much greater attention paid by the government to higher-profile cases like that of news anchor Cheng Lei, released by China in 2023, and writer Yang Hengjun, still imprisoned on spying charges.

“Gordon is also an Australian citizen – why doesn’t he deserve more attention to stronger positions by the Australian government, like how it has been done for Cheng Lei and Yang Hengjun?”

The former Hong Kong lawmaker fled Hong Kong while on bail in December 2020 after he was hit with criminal charges over his role in pro-democracy protests. He was granted a special travel exemption to enter Australia with his wife and children in March 2021 during the pandemic.

Mr Hui said the grant of asylum had brought the family a great sense of security. “We are very much relieved because we have been living in Australia for 4½ years and my wife and my kids are more settled. There were many questions in the past, but now those questions are answered by this protection.”

In July 2023, Hong Kong police placed a $HK1m bounty on Mr Hui and Melbourne-based Australian lawyer Kevin Yam, in an unprecedented application of the Beijing-authored National Security Law.

Chief Superintendent Steven Li said Hong Kong police “won’t stop chasing them” under a controversial law that bans acts of ­secession, subversion, terrorism and collusion with ­foreign forces, and was imposed under instructions from Beijing after months of protests in 2019.

Mr Hui said he would still be restricted in where he could travel, not only to those countries that had extradition treaties with China but even those that were simply friendly to Beijing.

“They might have diplomatic relations – I wouldn’t go to those countries unless they are free and open countries and democracies, so there’s half of the world I wouldn’t travel to,” he said.

“But think about those Hong Kong officials who put bounties and arrest warrants over my head – they’re sanctioned by the US, so there’s half the world where they can’t travel either, so that’s fair enough,” he says.

He said he would like to see the Australian government using its Magnitsky legislation to join the US in imposing sanctions on those same Hong Kong and Chinese officials.

“I haven’t seen any sanctions being put up by the Australian government for Hong Kong or Beijing officials who infringe on human rights in Hong Kong.

“It’s a pity and I can’t understand, but I’m still urging the government to do it.”

Earlier this year, Mr Hui was the target of a local intimidation campaign involving an anonymous letter purporting to be from Hong Kong authorities and offering a $HK1m reward for information leading to his arrest or the whereabouts of his family.

A fake pamphlet was also sent to Adelaide mosques claiming he wanted to “wage war” against ­“Islamic terrorism”.

“In terms of personal safety, I think I’m safe,” he said. “I have trust in the AFP, for example, who are really trying very hard to track down those people who sent the letters. They have been in constant communications with me, and they will call me from time to time to check on my safety.

“And with asylum status, I think it will be even better because those who are in Australia trying to do work for the Chinese government intimidating me, now they understand the Australian government’s stronger positions in giving me protections, and they would know there will be ­consequences.”

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/sanction-china-plea-from-hong-kong-activist-granted-asylum-ted-hui/news-story/f73926988843428ac6bc6ae97dc5d135

https://qresear.ch/?q=Ted+Hui

https://qresear.ch/?q=Gordon+Ng

https://qresear.ch/?q=Kevin+Yam

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109555

File: 5ee7da2ede104cf⋯.jpg (54 KB,800x534,400:267,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 9678571785af624⋯.jpg (1.94 MB,2500x1667,2500:1667,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23476569 (180927ZAUG25) Notable: Far-right Israeli politician's visa cancelled ahead of speaking tour — The federal government has cancelled the visa of Simcha Rothman, a far-right Israeli MP from Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s coalition, blocking his planned speaking events in Australia and banning him from entry for three years. Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke said, “If you are coming to Australia to spread a message of hate and division, we don’t want you here.” Rothman, who has advocated expelling Palestinians from Gaza, denounced the decision as “blatant anti-Semitism.” The cancellation comes a week after Australia said it would recognise a Palestinian state at the UN next month.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>73631 (pb)

>>109251

>>109520

>>109521

Far-right Israeli politician's visa cancelled ahead of speaking tour

Jake Evans - 18 August 2025

The federal government has cancelled the visa of Israeli politician Simcha Rothman, a member of Israel's far right Mafdal-Religious Zionism party, just days before he was due to arrive in Australia for a speaking event.

Mr Rothman, whose party is part of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's governing coalition, has previously advocated for the expulsion of Palestinians from Gaza, and denied claims of starvation in the territory.

In May Mr Rothman told the UK's Channel 4 that Britain should let Palestinians "run away" from Gaza, and if it did not, "you are aiding and abetting a terrorist organisation using them as human shields".

He added those refugees should not be accepted into Israel, however, because "they are our enemies".

"And according to international law, treaties about refugees in a time of war, you don't let them conquer your country with refugees," he said.

The Israeli politician was due to speak at events in Australia in a matter of days, including a Sydney event next Thursday hosted by the Australian Jewish Association.

But his visa has been cancelled, and Mr Simcha has been banned from travel to Australia for three years — a condition that is sometimes applied to a cancellation depending on the grounds it was cancelled on.

Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke said Australia would not accept people travelling to cause division.

"Our government takes a hard line on people who seek to come to our country and spread division," Mr Burke said.

"If you are coming to Australia to spread a message of hate and division, we don't want you here.

"Under our government, Australia will be a country where everyone can be safe, and feel safe."

Rothman claims visa denial is 'anti-Semitic'

In a post on social media, Mr Rothman responded to the visa cancellation.

"In the decision to deny the visa, the Australian Home Affairs Minister claims that my presence and my words will have a serious impact on peace and the rule of law in Australia, meaning that the Islamist mob calling for the destruction of Israel on the streets of Sydney and Melbourne will not be happy about my presence," he wrote.

"I was invited by the community in Australia due to anti-Semitic attacks on synagogues and a strong sense of alienation and hostility within the community.

"The Australian government's decision to deny me the opportunity to come and speak to my people, due to expressing simple and clear positions, is clear and blatant anti-Semitism that gives a boost to terrorism."

Mr Rothman's visa cancellation is the first major action against a member of Israel's Knesset since the federal government's announcement last week that it would recognise a Palestinian state at next month's United Nations meeting.

Israeli minister Itamar Ben-Gvir, one of two government members sanctioned by Australia, accused the federal government on social media of aiding Hamas.

"The Australian government's active support for Hamas and terrorists, and the entry ban against MK Simcha Rothman, are a historical stain and a shame for the Australian government," Mr Ben-Gvir said in a post in Hebrew, translated to English.

"The cheers of joy by Israeli left-wing activists, Hamas collaborators, and Israel slanderers around the world, are a disgrace that will never be erased from their minds."

In June, Australia joined several other nations to impose sanctions on Mr Ben-Gvir and another minister, Bezalel Smotrich, accusing the men of inciting violence against Palestinians in the West Bank.

Mr Smotrich is the leader of the Mafdal-Religious Zionism party, of which Mr Rothman is a member.

Liberal senator Dave Sharma, who was previously an ambassador to Israel, said he was not aware of Mr Rothman during his time in Israel but that elected representatives should as a principle be granted entry to Australia.

"I would say that elected representatives from democratic nations, liberal democracies with friendly relations with Australia, the presumption should always be they are granted a visa, they are entitled to visit Australia, even if we don't always agree with their views," Senator Sharma told Sky News.

"I would like to know the basis on which Tony Burke has cancelled this visa because it seems as though it was issued. And what are the comments in particular that he finds so troubling that he think would incite social unrest here in Australia?"

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-08-18/simcha-rothman-visa-cancelled/105668088

https://x.com/rothmar/status/1957332583785669039

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109556

File: e7015e45185763a⋯.jpg (245.25 KB,2035x1357,2035:1357,Clipboard.jpg)

File: dd7fbac16d76a79⋯.jpg (3.6 MB,3504x2336,3:2,Clipboard.jpg)

File: e4d19b2f71c23cb⋯.jpg (232.97 KB,1600x1066,800:533,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23476575 (180931ZAUG25) Notable: Royal Randwick lined up for Pope visit on a bumper weekend — Sydney’s Royal Randwick racecourse is being considered to host a papal Mass in 2028 if Pope Leo XIV accepts Anthony Albanese’s invitation to attend the Catholic Church’s International Eucharistic Congress. Early planning has flagged September 30, coinciding with the AFL grand final in Melbourne and potentially disrupting the Epsom Handicap and NRL grand final weekend. The Archdiocese of Sydney said dates and venues were still open, with attendance expected to vary greatly depending on whether it marks the first papal visit to Australia in 20 years. Royal Randwick last hosted Pope Benedict XVI in 2008.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Royal Randwick lined up for Pope visit on a bumper weekend

Chris Barrett - August 15, 2025

Royal Randwick racecourse is in line to stage a papal Mass two decades after a crowd of 400,000 filled the venue for Pope Benedict XVI’s appearance at World Youth Day.

Sydney will host the Catholic Church’s International Eucharistic Congress in 2028 and Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has invited the new head of the Vatican, Pope Leo XIV, to attend.

The American pontiff is yet to take up the offer, but the church has begun devising plans in the event he does, and Royal Randwick has been discussed as a favoured site for a large-scale public gathering.

It’s understood Saturday, September 30, of the October long weekend that year, has been raised as an option for a papal Mass in Sydney.

Such timing would force racing’s $1.5 million Epsom Handicap to be relocated from Royal Randwick and potentially cause disruption around the NRL grand final, which is typically played on the first Sunday of October. It would also be the same day as the AFL grand final in Melbourne.

The church congress, which Sydney is holding in 2028 for the first time in a century, is being organised by the Catholic Archdiocese of Sydney, which said dates and venues were still to be determined.

“There have been several dates touted for the [congress], but we are keeping options open because we are excited about the potential of having Pope Leo here and will obviously work around his availability, if he accepts the invite,” said Benjamin Galea, chief operating officer for the International Eucharistic Congress.

“Estimates of pilgrim numbers and sourcing of venues will differ greatly depending on whether we get our first papal visit in 20 years, and so these early stages are planning for several different possibilities.”

Galea said while the archdiocese had expressed its desire to have the Pope visit Australia, he expected any official acceptance would be made directly in response to Albanese’s invitation.

The quadrennial congress is not as big as World Youth Day, a week-long coming together of young Catholics from around the world.

But a crowd of 100,000 assembled in Budapest for the 2020 event, which was held in late 2021 due to the pandemic, for a closing Mass led by Pope Francis.

Royal Randwick’s 80 hectares and central location make it one of the few places suitable for such an occasion.

In 2008, there was resistance from Randwick-based racehorse trainers to World Youth Day, where more than 200,000 people slept overnight before a Mass fronted by Pope Benedict XVI.

It went ahead after the racing industry was promised $40 million in compensation from the state and federal governments, including $10.8 million for relocation of horses and staff while Randwick was shut down.

Railings had to be taken down and horses moved to temporary stables, but according to early discussions, the crowds for the closing Mass at the 2028 congress would be contained to the in-field and the grandstands rather than on the track itself.

That would prevent the racecourse being out of action for weeks on end, limiting the impact on other major races such as the $20 million The Everest, which is held in mid-October.

Albanese invited Pope Leo XIV to Australia at the Vatican after attending his inauguration Mass along with other world leaders at St Peter’s Basilica in May.

It was the first time an Australian prime minister and a pontiff had met in 16 years and the Pope blessed the rosary beads of Albanese’s late mother, Maryanne, who was Catholic.

The Chicago-born former cardinal is no stranger to Australia, having made several trips in his past capacity as prior general of the Order of St Augustine.

Then known as Robert Prevost, he delivered a Mass at Sydney’s Collaroy Beach after World Youth Day in 2008 and visited St Augustine’s College at Brookvale in 2008 and 2009.

According to the 2021 census, more than 5 million Australians – 20 per cent of the population – identified as being Catholic.

https://www.theage.com.au/national/nsw/royal-randwick-lined-up-for-pope-visit-on-a-bumper-weekend-for-sydney-20250814-p5mn01.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109557

File: 3a178eb30926f0d⋯.jpg (157.23 KB,2047x1152,2047:1152,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 59b137f1ebb0cd4⋯.jpg (215.42 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23476579 (180938ZAUG25) Notable: Citizenship reward for PNG warriors to fight for Australia in ADF — Thousands of Papua New Guineans will be able to gain Australian citizenship by joining the Australian Defence Force under a new treaty to be signed by Anthony Albanese and PNG Prime Minister James Marape on September 15. PNG Defence Minister Billy Joseph said the deal, timed with PNG’s 50th independence anniversary, would cement the nations as defence partners and allow up to 10,000 recruits. The agreement, addressing Australia’s workforce shortfall, will see PNG citizens serve in support roles while retaining dual nationality. Fiji is expected to join the scheme later.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>73607 (pb)

Citizenship reward for PNG warriors to fight for Australia in ADF

BEN PACKHAM - August 15, 2025

1/2

Thousands of Papua New Guineans will get Australian citizenship by serving with the Australian Defence Force after the PNG government dropped its resistance to the legal requirement that it feared would deprive the country of some of its most capable people.

Anthony Albanese and PNG counterpart James Marape will sign off on the plan next month to open the ADF to PNG recruits as part of a landmark defence treaty.

The agreement will cement PNG as one of only three Australian allies, after the US and New Zealand, shutting out China from any security involvement with Australia’s closest neighbour.

PNG Defence Minister Billy Joseph said it would include mechanisms committing each country to come to the other’s aid if threatened with military force.

“The idea is that PNG and Australia are like two houses, and the treaty will create a big fence so that those two houses are inside one fence,” Dr Joseph told The Australian.

“We want to be seen as a partner who can be trusted in good times and in bad times.”

PNG citizens will become the first in the Pacific other than New Zealanders to join the ADF under the government’s plan to address a military workforce crisis.

Dr Joseph said his country could supply 10,000 personnel, and “if they want more, we are willing to give them”.

“You know that 58 per of the population of PNG is below the age of 25, so you are looking at a very big pool, and Australia can have as many as they want,” he said.

Would-be recruits would have to meet “stringent requirements”, Dr Joseph said, and would be signed up in Port Moresby and provincial centres including Lae and Manus Island.

Admission to the ADF is likely to become a coveted prize for Papua New Guineans, with the salaries on offer far exceeding those available in their home country, where unemployment is rife and the minimum wage is just $1.30 an hour.

The defence treaty will be inked by Mr Albanese and Mr Marape in PNG on September 15 – the day before PNG’s 50th anniversary of independence from Australia.

It will open the way for much closer military co-operation between the countries, and support the expansion and modernisation of the PNG Defence Force.

Dr Joseph said it would offer no immunities for Australian personnel if they broke the law while on PNG soil, and PNGDF personnel would be subject to Australian law when in Australia.

Australian law requires that anyone serving in the ADF is a citizen or applies to take out Australian citizenship within 90 days of joining up.

PNG initially expressed concern over the requirement, because it wanted to ensure its people would return home after their service.

But Australia argued its sovereignty required that those who served under the Australian flag were Australian citizens. Papua New Guineans who take up the offer will retain their PNG citizenship as dual nationals.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109558

File: 8d46698a6424a90⋯.mp4 (11.77 MB,960x540,16:9,Clipboard.mp4)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23476583 (180949ZAUG25) Notable: Video: MRF-D joins U.S. Ambassador, Solomon Islands Government to honor Allied sacrifice for 83rd Battle of Guadalcanal Anniversary — U.S. Marines from Marine Rotational Force–Darwin stood with officials in Honiara on August 6 to mark the 83rd anniversary of the Battle of Guadalcanal. A sunrise service at Skyline Ridge honored more than 7,000 Allied troops and Solomon Islanders killed, with wreath-layings and tributes recalling the brutal six-month campaign that turned the tide of the Pacific War. Colonel Jason Armas said victory “was not won by Marines alone but forged in partnership with the people of these islands.” Tributes were paid to Solomon Scouts and Coastwatchers whose bravery was vital to the Allied victory.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109224

>>109495

>>109310

MRF-D joins U.S. Ambassador, Solomon Islands Government to honor Allied sacrifice for 83rd Battle of Guadalcanal Anniversary

Capt. John Fischer - 08.08.2025

HONIARA, Solomon Islands — On August 6, 2025, U.S. Marines with the Marine Rotational Force – Darwin (MRF-D) 25.3 Marine Air-Ground Task Force (MAGTF) stood alongside U.S. and Solomon Islands officials atop Skyline Ridge, participating in the 83rd anniversary commemoration of the Battle of Guadalcanal. Hosted by U.S. Ambassador to Papua New Guinea, Solomon Islands, and Vanuatu Ann Marie Yastishock and with the Solomon Islands government, the ceremony served as a solemn reminder of the shared history and sacrifice that binds the United States and Solomon Islands in strength, security, and prosperity.

Representing the U.S. Marine Corps and 1st Marine Regiment’s “The Old Breed” in this historic location, MRF-D’s presence honored the memory of the Marines from the 1st, 5th, and 7th Marine Regiments who landed on Guadalcanal in 1942 — Marines whose courage helped define the identity of the modern Corps. Their presence reflected a deep respect for the sacrifices of both American and Solomon Islander lives lost during the six-month campaign that turned the tide of the Pacific War.

“As Marines returning to this region today, we do so with humility and gratitude,” said Col. Jason Armas, commanding officer of the MRF-D 25.3 MAGTF. “We are here to acknowledge that victory in Guadalcanal was not won by Marines alone but forged in partnership with the people of these islands. May their courage be remembered, and their spirit of unity and resilience live on in our bond of friendship, today and always.”

The sunrise ceremony, held at the Guadalcanal American Memorial, included wreath-layings and tributes to the more than 7,000 Allied service members and Solomon Islanders who died in the Guadalcanal Campaign. Superintendent Ryan Blum of the American Battle Monuments Commission noted that Skyline Ridge, once known as Hill 73, witnessed some of the fiercest fighting of the war and now serves as hallowed ground for remembrance. During the memorial’s construction, the U.S. Defense Prisoner-of-War/Missing in Action Accounting Agency uncovered more U.S. service member remains, returned final closure and peace of mind to the families of lost loved ones.

Later that morning, MRF-D Marines honored the Solomon Scouts and Coastwatchers — local and Allied personnel whose bravery and intelligence-gathering were instrumental in defeating enemy imperial forces. These individuals operated deep in enemy territory, often unarmed and always at risk, guiding Allied forces through dense jungles, rescuing downed airmen, and relaying critical information that shaped the outcome of the campaign.

“These were not supporting roles,” said Col. Armas. “The Coastwatchers and Solomon Scouts were integral to the success of the Guadalcanal campaign and to turning the tide of war in the Pacific.”

Among those remembered was Sergeant Major Sir Jacob Vouza, a local hero tortured by his enemy captors but who refused to betray Allied forces. His story, along with those of Coastwatchers like Frederick “Snow” Rhoades and local scouts like Biuku Gasa and Eroni Kumana, was shared to highlight the deep and often overlooked impact of Solomon Islander sacrifice.

Today, MRF-D continues to serve as a forward-deployed force in the Indo-Pacific, committed to enhancing regional security and honoring the legacy of those who came before. That legacy includes not only U.S. Marines in uniform but the brave communities who fought beside them in times of great peril.

“As we commemorate today those lost in this bloody battle and give thanks for the freedoms we enjoy as a result of their sacrifices, let us also remember that the work continues to ensure safety of all of our countries, and the Pacific,” said Ambassador Yastishock. “From UXO [unexploded ordnance] clearance to educational exchanges, the United States will continue to work with Solomon Islands to ensure our people are safer, stronger, and more prosperous.”

As wreaths were laid and names echoed across revered grounds, the Marines of MRF-D stood with U.S. and Solomon Islands government officials as quiet sentinels of memory — part of a small but enduring presence that connects the past to the present and reaffirms the shared values of peace, sacrifice, and unity.

https://www.dvidshub.net/news/545258/mrf-d-joins-us-ambassador-solomon-islands-government-honor-allied-sacrifice-83rd-battle-guadalcanal-anniversary

https://x.com/MRFDarwin/status/1955113862879232349

https://qresear.ch/?q=Guadalcanal

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109559

File: cb985e82bbe3027⋯.mp4 (15.97 MB,480x270,16:9,Clipboard.mp4)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23476596 (181002ZAUG25) Notable: VP Day: Remembering the war and what we sacrificed"Eighty years ago, prime minister Ben Chifley began his address to the nation with perfect simplicity: ‘Fellow citizens, the war is over’… Chifley turned his words to all who had fought the darkness but not lived to see the light… ‘Let us remember those whose lives were given that we may enjoy this glorious moment’… We think of all we owe to every Australian who served in our name. Every Australian who fell, and every Australian who came home but could never leave the battle. Every family that felt the pride and weight of a loved one who put on the uniform. Every family that knew the grief that had no ending, only a beginning. Amid the shadows of war, the power of their courage and the strength of their character is a light that is a beacon to us still. They showed us what it is to remain true to ourselves, no matter what. They showed us what it means to stand shoulder to shoulder with friends and allies. And together, they turned the tide. As we stand here today, think of everyone who gathered 80 years ago. Think of the noise of their elation. And, hanging in the air just beyond the sound of their happiness, the silence of those who never came home. A silence that touched every corner of our continent, from the biggest city to the smallest country town. As we do, we return to another sentence whose simplicity is matched only by its power: Lest we forget." — Anthony Albanese, The Australian

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109224

>>109495

>>109310

>>109558

VP Day: Remembering the war and what we sacrificed

ANTHONY ALBANESE - August 15, 2025

Eighty years ago, prime minister Ben Chifley began his address to the nation with a sentence of perfect simplicity – and infinite power: “Fellow citizens, the war is over.”

The signing of the surrender was some weeks off, but the darkness that had engulfed the world – and made its last stand in the Pacific – was at last lifted.

Here in Sydney – as they did in towns and cities across Australia – crowds poured into the streets. They sang and danced amid a joyous blizzard of paper. Chifley, who had seen his friend and predecessor John Curtin worn down by the gravity of war leadership, turned his words to all who had fought the darkness – but not lived to see the light.

“Let us remember those whose lives were given that we may enjoy this glorious moment and may look forward to a peace which they have won for us.

“Let us remember those whose thoughts, with proud sorrow, turn towards gallant, loved ones who will not come back. … Nothing can fully repay the debt we owe them nor can history record in adequate terms their deeds …”

Chifley spoke, too, of the home front, the men and women who had “performed miracles of production … so that the battle of supply could be won”.

Between us and that extraordinary day, eight decades now stretch. At this distance, the story of World War II has become set in our memories.

The Allied victory over tyranny has, in retrospect, taken on a feel of inevitability.

Part of the debt we owe to all who served our nation is to remind ourselves how close history came to taking a different path. And to remember and honour every Australian – and every friend and every ally – who gave everything to ensure it did not. Across Europe and North Africa. Across Asia and the Pacific, and even across our own shores. We think of all the stories of courage. Of resilience and exhaustion, of fear and elation, and an endless longing for the home that so many never saw again. These are not stories rendered in bronze or marble, but written in flesh and blood. Stories of ordinary people facing the extraordinary. Facing loss, securing victory. Stories of mateship tempered in the fire of combat.

We think of all we owe to every Australian who served in our name. Every Australian who fell, and every Australian who came home but could never leave the battle. Every family that felt the pride and weight of a loved one who put on the uniform. Every family that knew the grief that had no ending, only a beginning.

As we gather in the very place so many Australians celebrated that day, we reflect on what victory meant – and what it cost.

Every life and dream and future swallowed in that vortex of madness and cruelty, from every battlefield and every burning city, from the prisoner of war camps to the unprecedented horror of the concentration camps. These were nightmares made real – not by monsters but by human beings in a grotesque perversion of humanity.

Yet, as we feel that weight, our hearts are lifted by every Australian who stood against it.

Amid the shadows of war, the power of their courage and the strength of their character is a light that is a beacon to us still. They showed us what it is to remain true to ourselves, no matter what. They showed us what it means to stand shoulder to shoulder with friends and allies. And together, they turned the tide. As we stand here today, think of everyone who gathered 80 years ago. Think of the noise of their elation. And, hanging in the air just beyond the sound of their happiness, the silence of those who never came home.

A silence that touched every corner of our continent, from the biggest city to the smallest country town. As we do, we return to another sentence whose simplicity is matched only by its power: Lest we forget.

This is the text of a speech Anthony Albanese delivered on Friday, August 15 2025, in Martin Place, Sydney.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/commentary/remembering-the-war-and-what-we-sacrificed/news-story/93c04fb76fbb1d840f6e5a2f89a41bbb

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109560

File: fabb7c739d32f92⋯.jpg (179.4 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 06a4658ef75e6fd⋯.jpg (226.76 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: c240784578ed953⋯.jpg (244.18 KB,750x754,375:377,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23482561 (190923ZAUG25) Notable: Israel bans Australian officials as diplomatic row intensifies — Israel has revoked visas for Australian representatives to the Palestinian Authority and warned of tighter restrictions on official travel after Canberra blocked Israeli MP Simcha Rothman from visiting. Foreign Minister Gideon Sa’ar said the Australian ambassador was notified and future visa applications will be “carefully examined,” citing Australia’s recognition of a Palestinian state and refusal to admit Israeli figures including former minister Ayelet Shaked and Rothman. Tony Burke defended cancelling Rothman’s visa, saying Australia would not accept visitors spreading “hate and division.” The move escalates tensions after Australia sanctioned Religious Zionist leader Bezalel Smotrich in June.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109251

>>109520

>>109521

>>109555

Israel bans Australian officials as diplomatic row intensifies

RHIANNON DOWN - 18 August 2025

Israel has revoked the visas of Australian representatives to the Palestinian Authority and warned of tighter entry restrictions for officials, in a sharp escalation of diplomatic tensions after Canberra blocked a controversial Israeli politician from visiting.

Gideon Sa’ar, Israel’s foreign minister, confirmed on Monday he had ordered the cancellations, saying the Australian ambassador to Israel had been notified and the Israeli Embassy in Canberra instructed to “carefully examine” any future visa requests from Australian officials.

The move follows the Albanese government’s decision to revoke the visa of Simcha Rothman, a member of Israel’s right-wing Religious Zionist Party and chair of the Knesset’s Constitution, Law and Justice Committee.

Mr Rothman was scheduled to begin a solidarity tour with Australia’s Jewish community this week before Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke intervened at the 11th hour.

“I decided to revoke the visas of Australian representatives to the Palestinian Authority,” Mr Sa’ar said in a statement.

“The Australian Ambassador to Israel was just notified on the matter. I also instructed the Israeli Embassy in Canberra to carefully examine any official Australian visa application for entry to Israel.

“This follows Australia’s decisions to recognize a ‘Palestinian state’ and against the backdrop of Australia’s unjustified refusal to grant visas to a number of Israeli figures, including former Minister Ayelet Shaked and the Chairman of the Knesset’s Constitution, Law and Justice Committee, MK Simcha Rothman.

“While antisemitism is raging in Australia, including manifestations of violence against Jews and Jewish institutions, the Australian government is choosing to fuel it by false accusations, as if the visit of Israeli figures will disrupt public order and harm Australia’s Muslim population.

“It is shameful and unacceptable!”

Earlier on Monday, Mr Rothman was unable to travel after his visa was revoked the day he was due to fly to Australia to meet with victims and visit institutions targeted in anti-Semitic incidents in Australia.

Mr Rothman has drawn criticism for describing children in Gaza as “enemies”, pushing for the takeover of the West Bank and forcefully grabbing a megaphone out of a protester’s hand in New York, prompting a criminal harassment complaint that was later dropped.

Mr Burke confirmed on Monday he had blocked Mr Rothman from entering Australia, declaring anyone who came to the country to spread “hate and division” would not be welcome.

“Our government takes a hard line on people who seek to come to our country and spread division,” Mr Burke said.

“If you are coming to Australia to spread a message of hate and division, we don’t want you here. Under our government, Australia will be a country where everyone can be safe, and feel safe.”

Mr Rothman’s party forms part of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s ruling coalition. The Religious Zionist Party’s leader, Bezalel Smotrich, was sanctioned by Australia in June for inciting violence against Palestinians in the West Bank. He is also a chair of the Knesset’s Constitution, Law and Justice Committee.

Australian Jewish Association chief executive Robert Gregory, whose organisation had arranged the visit, said the decision to cancel the visa was the result of Labor’s obsession with “targeting the Jewish community and Israel”.

“All the paperwork was filled out correctly and on time and the visa was approved,” he said. “The timing of the cancellation at the last minute was spiteful and intended to cause maximum harm to the Australian Jewish community.”

Mr Gregory said the purpose of Mr Rothman’s tour was to show solidarity with Australia’s Jewish community”.

The decision comes after Mr Burke approved Palestinian woman Mona Zahed’s application for an entertainment visa, after she had publicly praised Hamas’s October 7 attack. The visa – which is usually reserved for rock stars and sportsmen and women stars – was later cancelled on the grounds she was not eligible to receive it.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/tony-burke-blocks-visa-for-rightwing-israeli-politician/news-story/84447e7f70b88a0ebec3eefa622a51c9

https://x.com/gidonsaar/status/1957400330875896095

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109561

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23482656 (190943ZAUG25) Notable: Video: Israeli MP Simcha Rothman was blocked from Australia in part due to ‘inflammatory’ Hamas calls — Internal Home Affairs documents reveal Israeli MP Simcha Rothman was denied entry to Australia over fears his past statements, including calling Gazan children “enemies” and urging Hamas’s elimination through total conquest of Gaza, would inflame tensions and risk “the good order of the Australian community.” Officials warned his presence could embolden anti-Islamic sentiment. Penny Wong accused Israel of “isolating itself” after it revoked Australian visas in retaliation. Jewish leaders including Mark Leibler and the Executive Council of Australian Jewry urged both governments to end tit-for-tat measures to protect $2bn trade and security ties.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109251

>>109520

>>109521

>>109555

Israeli MP Simcha Rothman was blocked from Australia in part due to ‘inflammatory’ Hamas calls

RICHARD FERGUSON and RHIANNON DOWN - 19 August 2025

1/2

An Israeli MP was blocked from Australia due to his “inflammatory” calls for the elimination of terror group Hamas via the total conquest of Gaza and fears he would upset the Muslim community, as Jewish leaders call on both Labor and the Netanyahu government to cool their growing diplomatic stoush.

But the document also says his calls to eliminate Hamas – which has killed scores of Palestinians who have revolted against their iron rule of Gaza and was behind the biggest mass murder of Jewish people since the Holocaust – would be considered “inflammatory and concerning” to some in the Australian community.

Foreign Minister Penny Wong has accused Israel of isolating itself after her representatives to the West Bank were due to be thrown out of the Jewish State in retaliation for Labor’s recognition of Palestine and Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke’s move to cancel the visa of Simcha Rothman.

Mr Rothman – a member of Israel’s right-wing Religious Zionist Party and chair of the Knesset’s Constitution, Law and Justice Committee – was scheduled to begin a solidarity tour with Australia’s Jewish community this week before his visa was cancelled at the 11th hour.

Home Affairs documents obtained by The Australian now reveal that Mr Rothman was denied his visa for fear his past comments – including calling Gazan children “enemies” and calling for Palestinians to be relocated to other countries – would spark major counter-protests.

“The visa holder’s social media and public statements as described above mirror the policies of his Religious Zionist Party including the elimination of Hamas and the expansion and sovereignty of the Israeli State, and denial of any wrongdoing by Israel against Palestinians and Gaza during the current conflict.

“These statements have been received by members of the Australian community as inflammatory and concerning.”

The Hamas comments from the Home Affairs department contrast with Anthony Albanese’s repeated comments that the Gazan terror group should disarm, leave Palestine, and play no role in a two-state solution.

The government has previously come under pressure for giving visas to anti-Israel speakers, including Brit Sammi Hamdi who encouraged people to “celebrate” October 7 and preacher Mohammed Ghuloom who had praised slain Hezbollah terror chief Hassan Nasrallah.

And this month, Mr Burke had to reverse the decision to let in a Palestinian author who said she had prayed to see a day like October 7, after his department was due to let her in on an entertainment visa.

Israel’s top diplomat Gideon Sa’ar has said he will instruct the Jewish State’s embassy in Canberra to “carefully examine” all other official visa applications after Mr Rothman’s blocking, and accused Labor of making false allegations against Israeli politicians.

A high-ranking Foreign Affairs department official rang Israel’s ambassador Amir Maimon to convey the government’s resentment over the decision to cancel the visas of Australian representatives to the Palestinian Authority.

Department of Foreign Affairs deputy secretary Harinder Sidhu made the phone call on Monday night shortly after Israel expelled the diplomats in retaliation to the government’s decision to cancel the visa of a far right Israeli politician.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109562

File: 7eefbc548a4f441⋯.jpg (104.76 KB,1080x720,3:2,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 5fd0cfe55173fd3⋯.jpg (5.04 MB,3818x2547,3818:2547,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 4459c132b3afd33⋯.jpg (73.62 KB,750x332,375:166,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23482715 (190958ZAUG25) Notable: Netanyahu blasts Albanese as ‘weak’ as diplomatic relations plummet — Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has branded Anthony Albanese a “weak politician who betrayed Israel and abandoned Australia’s Jews” as tensions over visa cancellations plunged ties to historic lows. The row began when far-right Israeli MP Simcha Rothman was denied entry, prompting Israel to revoke visas of Australian diplomats in Ramallah. Penny Wong condemned the move as isolating Israel, while DFAT officials protested to Israel’s ambassador. Home Affairs documents cited Rothman’s past remarks, including describing Gazan children as “enemies,” as likely to inflame division. Jewish leaders warned trade and security ties worth $2bn are at risk.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109251

>>109520

>>109521

>>109555

Netanyahu blasts Albanese as ‘weak’ as diplomatic relations plummet

Matthew Knott - August 19, 2025

1/2

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has launched a scathing personal attack on Anthony Albanese, branding his Australian counterpart weak as tit-for-tat visa cancellations plunged bilateral relations to their lowest levels since the creation of the state of Israel.

Alarmed Jewish community leaders called for the two nations to stop tensions spiralling out of control after Simcha Rothman, a far-right member of the Israeli government, was denied an Australian visa and Israel retaliated by revoking the visas of Australian diplomats working in the occupied West Bank.

Netanyahu, who spoke on the phone to Albanese a fortnight ago, said in a post on his official X account on Tuesday night: “History will remember Albanese for what he is: A weak politician who betrayed Israel and abandoned Australia’s Jews.”

Albanese last week accused Netanyahu of being in “denial” about the scale of humanitarian suffering in Gaza. His office was approached for comment over Netanyahu’s latest post.

Netanyahu attacked the Albanese government on social media last December after a synagogue was firebombed in Melbourne, accusing it of encouraging antisemitism by adopting an “extreme anti-Israeli position”, including in votes at the United Nations.

In a move that drew a speedy rebuke from Foreign Minister Penny Wong, Israeli Foreign Minister Gideon Sa’ar sent a warning about any Australian representatives who sought to come to his country, saying he had instructed the Israeli embassy in Canberra to “carefully examine” any official visa applications.

Wong slammed the decision, expected to affect three employees of the Australian representative office in Ramallah, as another step in “isolating Israel” from other countries and undermining attempts to find peace in the Middle East.

Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade deputy secretary Harinder Sidhu called Israel’s ambassador to Australia Amir Maimon on Monday night to express the government’s displeasure at the decision.

A nine-page Home Affairs Department record of the Rothman decision, obtained by this masthead, says that Rothman could have used his planned speaking tour to Australia to “continue making inflammatory statements to promote his controversial views and ideologies, which may lead to fostering division in the community”.

“Specifically, I consider his presence in Australia would or might be a risk to the good order of the Australian community or a segment of the Australian community, namely the Islamic population,” a delegate for Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke wrote in the document, dated August 18, which outlines the reasons for his visa approval to be overturned.

The document references media reporting of Rothman’s comments in which he described Gazan children as “our enemies”, argued a Palestinian state would be the first step towards the destruction of Israel and that Israel bears the responsibility for eliminating Hamas, the militant group that has governed the Gaza Strip since 2007.

“The visa holder’s social media and public statements ... mirror the policies of his Religious Zionist Party, including the elimination of Hamas and the expansion and sovereignty of the Israeli state, and denial of any wrongdoing by Israel against Palestinians and Gaza during the current conflict,” the document states.

“These statements have been received by members of the Australian community as inflammatory and concerning.”

The document also notes that Rothman’s arrival was protested by members of the local Jewish community who opposed his support for a controversial overhaul of the Israeli judiciary in January 2024, during a visit to the US.

“Some protesters allege he is indirectly responsible for the Hamas October 7, 2023 attacks as he ignored the advice of top Israeli military leaders that the controversial judicial legislation was leading to political instability that threatened military preparedness,” the document says in a passage that has raised eyebrows in some quarters of the Jewish community.

Sa’ar named Rothman’s visa refusal, which he called “shameful and unacceptable”, and the government’s planned recognition of a Palestinian state as reasons for his decision to revoke the visas of Australian representatives to the Palestinian Authority.

He made the statement in Israel, shortly after 9pm on Monday, AEST.

Wong responded within four hours of Israel’s move by issuing a statement at about 12.45am on Tuesday, AEST, saying it was an unjustified reaction after Australia chose to recognise Palestine.

“At a time when dialogue and diplomacy are needed more than ever, the Netanyahu government is isolating Israel and undermining international efforts towards peace and a two-state solution,” she said.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109563

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23484714 (200926ZAUG25) Notable: Video: Jewish leaders hit out at Netanyahu as Albanese takes the high road in spat — Australia’s top Jewish community leaders have criticised Benjamin Netanyahu for calling Anthony Albanese “weak,” warning his remarks were “clumsy,” “provocative,” and fuelled antisemitism. Executive Council of Australian Jewry president Daniel Aghion wrote to Netanyahu urging “measured and seemly language befitting national leaders,” while praising Albanese for acting diplomatically. Zionist Federation president Jeremy Leibler also condemned Netanyahu’s tone, saying personal attacks were “unhelpful.” Albanese declined to escalate, saying he treats foreign leaders with respect. Meanwhile, Penny Wong and Tony Burke accused Israel of isolating itself after cancelling visas for Australian diplomats in retaliation over Simcha Rothman’s visa denial.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109251

>>109521

>>109555

>>109562

Jewish leaders hit out at Netanyahu as Albanese takes the high road in spat

Matthew Knott and Nick Bonyhady - August 20, 2025

1/2

Australia’s top Jewish community leaders have criticised Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu for personally attacking Anthony Albanese on social media, as Albanese declined to engage in a public slanging match with his counterpart.

In an unprecedented letter to an Israeli leader, the nation’s peak Jewish body wrote to Netanyahu to decry his “clumsy” and “inflammatory” intervention into Australian politics, accusing him of playing into the hands of antisemites.

Netanyahu called Albanese “weak” in a scathing social media post on Tuesday night that accused the prime minister of abandoning Israel and Australia’s Jewish community.

Albanese responded by telling reporters on Wednesday: “I treat leaders of other countries with respect, I engage with them in a diplomatic way.”

Albanese said he had made a point to call Netanyahu a fortnight ago to brief him on plans for Australia to recognise Palestinian statehood and listen to his point of view.

Asked why he thought Netanyahu might be targeting him, Albanese said: “I don’t take these things personally”.

The latest flare-up in tensions was triggered when Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke’s department cancelled a visa this week for far-right Israeli politician Simcha Rothman, basing the decision on his views and previous comments that included calling Gazan children “enemies” of Israel.

The personal tone of Netanyahu’s social media post has angered Jewish community leaders, who urged the two nations to de-escalate tensions before they spun out of control.

In a letter sent to Netanyahu on Thursday, Executive Council of Australian Jewry president Daniel Aghion said the Israeli prime minister’s comments about Albanese “were inflammatory and provocative, and demonstrated a woeful lack of understanding of social and political conditions in Australia”.

“These comments have played straight into the hands of opponents of Israel and antisemites, to the detriment of the Australian Jewish community,” he wrote.

“Had we been consulted, we would have warned against such a clumsy intervention into Australia’s domestic politics.

“The charge of antisemitism, whether made directly or indirectly, is a serious one and never to be made lightly.”

In a separate letter to Albanese, Aghion said the prime minister had been “excessive and gratuitously insulting” to Netanyahu last week by saying he was in denial about the suffering of Palestinian civillians in Gaza.

“It was unseemly for an Australian prime minister to depart from diplomatic norms concerning the leader of a country with which Australia has had friendly relations for many decades,” he said.

“You could simply have said that you vehemently disagreed with the Israeli prime minister, without descending into a personal attack.”

Arguing that both leaders were at fault for the deteriorating relationship, Aghion urged the two prime ministers to use “measured and seemly language befitting national leaders” to get bilateral links back on track.

Zionist Federation of Australia president Jeremy Leibler described Netanyahu’s comments as “entirely unhelpful and unproductive”.

“I don’t think the use of personal or inflammatory language is appropriate or helpful,” he told this masthead.

Leibler praised Albanese for acting as a “statesman” by declining to fire back at Netanyahu, saying that it was wrong to describe the government’s decision to deny Rothman a visa as antisemitic even though he disagrees with the move.

“The relationship is clearly under strain,” Leibler said. “Both nations should return to what brings them together and respectful discussion.”

Israel’s centrist opposition leader Yair Lapid accused Netanyahu of handing Albanese a political “gift” by attacking him. “The thing that most strengthens a leader in the democratic world today is a confrontation with Netanyahu, the most politically toxic leader in the Western world,” he said in a post on X.

Earlier on Wednesday, Burke hit back at Netanyahu for attacking Albanese.

“Strength is not measured by how many people you can blow up or how many children you can leave hungry,” Burke, who is one of the prime minister’s closest political allies, told ABC radio.

Instead, he said, Albanese had shown strength by calling Netanyahu before Australia moved to recognise Palestine.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109564

File: 5d86651ef9c7a4f⋯.jpg (572.77 KB,2047x1152,2047:1152,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23484725 (200932ZAUG25) Notable: AUKUS tensions: Hastie warns of ‘huge backlash’ if US backs out — Opposition home affairs spokesman Andrew Hastie has warned that if the US abandons its AUKUS commitment to supply Virginia-class submarines, it would trigger “a huge backlash” in Australia. He said local support in Rockingham, WA — where HMAS Stirling will host rotating US and UK submarines from 2027 — could collapse if “Pillar I” fails while communities absorb thousands of US personnel under what he calls “Pillar zero.” Hastie argued Australians would see it as “giving the US prime strategic geography in exchange for nothing,” urging Washington to uphold its deal.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109299

>>109316

>>109405

>>109512

AUKUS tensions: Hastie warns of ‘huge backlash’ if US backs out

JOE KELLY - 20 August 2025

Coalition home affairs spokesman Andrew Hastie has sounded a warning to Washington over AUKUS, arguing that a decision by the Pentagon to pull back from the submarine deal would ignite a damaging grassroots backlash.

Mr Hastie told The Australian “there will be consequences” if the Pentagon’s review of the AUKUS agreement resulted in the deal being shelved. He said this would be especially true in the local community of Rockingham, south of Perth.

“Australians are good partners and friends. But we don’t like being treated as mugs,” he said. “Particularly when we are effectively giving the US prime strategic geography so they can disperse their forces from the Indo-Pac (Indo-Pacific Command).”

Rockingham is home to HMAS Stirling, which, from 2027, will host the rotation of US and UK nuclear submarines under the AUKUS framework. The base is currently being upgraded to support the rotation.

Speaking on the sidelines of the Australian American Leadership Dialogue in Adelaide last week, Mr Hastie explained the rotation would require major housing and infrastructure upgrades, something he has referred to as “Pillar zero”.

He suggested the local community could end up accommodating an extra 3000-9000 Americans – a development that would place extra pressures on vital services.

If the US refused to uphold its side of the AUKUS deal and provide Australia with Virginia-class submarines, Mr Hastie warned that it would harden community attitudes towards “Pillar zero” and the accommodation of US personnel in Western Australia.

“If the USA, after this review, were to cancel Pillar I, it makes Pillar zero to the US Navy base almost impossible in my view because the backlash against America would be huge,” Mr Hastie told The Australian.

Under the AUKUS framework, the provision of three nuclear-powered Virginia-class submarines to Australia from the early 2030s is referred to as “Pillar I”. The sharing of advanced technologies makes up “Pillar II” of the deal.

“We talk a lot about Pillar I, which is the optimal pathway for a submarine. And we talk about Pillar II and all the emerging technologies. But no one’s talking about Pillar zero,” Mr Hastie said. “And I call Pillar zero the US Navy base that’s being built in Rockingham at HMAS Stirling.

“That’s the big secret at the heart of AUKUS – that in two years’ time, the US will have a squadron of Virginia-class submarines operating off the West Australian coastline.”

“And it’s really important that that has a social licence at the local level. At the moment, there’s not enough homes for Australians. Roads are congested. Our essential services are overrun,” he said. “So when you add up to 3000-9000 people, as the Americans have said, that’s going to potentially cause social licence issues.”

Mr Hastie said that if the Pentagon were to cancel Pillar I, there would be “a lot of pushback from the Australian people, not just locally in WA but across the country, because we would be basically giving the US prime strategic geography in exchange for nothing”.

“President Trump has written The Art of the Deal. He would himself agree that that is a very bad deal,” Mr Hastie said.

The opposition’s home affairs spokesman said he had raised this issue with a range of US congressmen including the Republican chair of the Senate Armed Services Committee, Roger Wicker, and the Democratic co-chair of the Congressional Friends of Australia Caucus, Joe Courtney.

“They’re very sympathetic to my perspective,” he said. “As a believer in the alliance, I want it to continue. I think AUKUS is a great opportunity for Australia and for the United States.”

Mr Hastie said a big reason why Pillar zero was at risk was “because (WA Premier) Roger Cook and the WA Labor state government has gone so slow on it. What we really need in WA is a (South Australian Premier) Peter Malinauskas who believes in AUKUS”.

“Decisions need to be made on roads, critical infrastructure, more houses need to be built in and around the area,” he said. “We’re worried about the social licence for integrating up to 9000 Americans.”

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/defence/aukus-tensions-hastie-warns-of-huge-backlash-if-us-backs-out/news-story/103fab9bb76508f287f74728ab923f5a

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109565

File: 486ce695d6dd3fe⋯.jpg (25.03 KB,553x449,553:449,Clipboard.jpg)

File: d1514b7e3f0edf3⋯.jpg (1.26 MB,5000x3303,5000:3303,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 12d130f97303f0b⋯.jpg (1.41 MB,5000x3333,5000:3333,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 3696111a1e60499⋯.jpg (1.36 MB,3319x5000,3319:5000,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23484746 (200948ZAUG25) Notable: Late former Central Coast mayor Laurie Maher linked to child sex abuse civil claims — Former Gosford mayor Laurie Maher, once celebrated for founding NSW homelessness charity Coast Shelter and awarded an OAM, has been posthumously linked to more than 100 civil child sex abuse claims from his time as superintendent of the Mount Penang Training School for Boys in the 1970s and 1980s. Maher, who died in May aged 86, had been acquitted of several charges but was awaiting retrial on others. Survivors allege sexual and physical abuse, including assaults in dormitories and offices. Lawyers say the process of pursuing claims is “really painful” for complainants, whose entire lives are placed under scrutiny. At least 59 cases have been settled by the NSW government, with victims stressing their fight is for acknowledgement, not “dirty money.”

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Late former Central Coast mayor Laurie Maher linked to child sex abuse civil claims

Mary-Louise Vince - 20 August 2025

1/2

The death of an accused paedophile, who had once been a respected community leader, has left behind scores of alleged victims who are suing over historical sexual abuse they say they suffered at a notorious boys' home he once ran on the New South Wales Central Coast.

Laurie Maher, 86, was most widely known as a tireless crusader against homelessness and domestic violence, founding what is today one of the largest homelessness charities in NSW — Coast Shelter.

Mr Maher served numerous terms on the former Gosford City Council, was mayor for four years and in 2010 awarded the Medal of the Order of Australia (OAM) for his service to the community.

He was never convicted of abuse, but died in May, awaiting a retrial on charges of buggery and indecent assault involving two boys.

The charges related to his time as the long-time superintendent of the Mount Penang Training School for Boys near Gosford, where many former detainees claim he sexually abused them during the 1970s and 1980s.

Mt Penang was among several state-run reform centres for "troubled" teenage boys who were convicted of varying offences.

Royal commission leads to charges

The ABC is aware of at least 100 civil child sex abuse claims dating back to when Mr Maher ran the Mount Penang Training School for Boys.

Allegations about the former superintendent's offending began to surface at the time of the Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sex Abuse between 2013 and 2017.

The royal commission did not directly examine Mt Penang. However the ABC understands 18 private submissions were received about Laurie Maher, which triggered a police investigation in 2016.

Mr Maher was arrested in 2020 and charged with 13 offences against six boys.

By the time the case reached a District Court trial in 2022, he stood accused of eight child sex abuse charges involving four boys spanning a 10-year period.

He was acquitted of six charges, but the jury was hung on the remaining two and a retrial was set down for September 2025.

Mr Maher unsuccessfully sought to halt the retrial in 2024 when he engaged high-profile barrister Margaret Cunneen to seek a permanent stay on proceedings due to his "old age and poor health".

Tony’s story

Tony, who did not want to use his real name, said it took decades to confront his past experiences at Mount Penang, where he found himself in the late 1980s, after he was caught stealing a car stereo system.

He said he was trying to feed and clothe his two younger siblings, who had been living with him in the roof cavity of a small building in Sydney for several years to escape violence at home.

At 16, Tony was sent to Mount Penang and placed under the care of Mr Maher, who he said sexually abused him on two separate occasions.

Tony alleged he was forced to perform oral sex on the superintendent — the first time he described being "trapped in a shed" with him, while the next time, he recalled being summoned to his office.

"Laurie Maher was a monster to me," he said.

"My life was ruined from the age of 16 because of him."

Tony described living in fear after being told by Mr Maher "to keep his mouth shut", barely sleeping in the large dormitory he shared with about 40 other boys.

"You'd hear screaming at night," he recalled.

After what he described as a life of homelessness, addiction, insomnia and crippling flashbacks, Tony started to receive the medical and psychological support he needed — and the strength to "speak out" — after accessing community housing during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Tony successfully sued the state in 2024 over the abuse he suffered while in detention in the late 1980s.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109566

File: 9c846abb95eb7b6⋯.jpg (3.46 MB,5000x3333,5000:3333,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 931faa9975f6684⋯.jpg (1.99 MB,3072x2304,4:3,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23484779 (201007ZAUG25) Notable: Video: Former SAS soldier Oliver Schulz committed to stand trial for war crimes charge of murder — Former SAS trooper Oliver Schulz, 43, will be the first Australian soldier to face trial for a war crimes charge after being committed to the NSW Supreme Court. He is accused of murdering Afghan villager Dad Mohammad in Uruzgan Province in 2012, an incident captured on helmet-cam and first exposed by ABC’s Four Corners. Footage showed Schulz asking, “You want me to drop this c*nt?” before firing three shots. Mohammad, a father of two, was initially deemed lawfully killed by ADF investigators. Schulz, charged in 2023, faces arraignment in October and could receive life in prison.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>73512 (pb)

>>73531 (pb)

>>73552 (pb)

Former SAS soldier Oliver Schulz committed to stand trial for war crimes charge of murder

Sean Rubinsztein-Dunlop - 20 August 2025

1/2

A former special forces trooper will be the first Australian soldier to stand trial for a war crimes charge, more than 13 years after he shot dead a villager in an Afghan field.

Former SAS trooper Oliver Schulz, 43, was charged in 2023 with the war crime of murder after helmet-cam footage aired on the ABC's Four Corners showed him in 2012 shooting Afghan man Dad Mohammad.

Local court Magistrate Greg Grogin today committed Mr Schulz to stand trial in the NSW Supreme Court, after previously condemning delays from Commonwealth prosecutors.

Mr Schulz faced a committal hearing in April and May, in which the local court heard from Australian Defence Force (ADF) witnesses and repeatedly watched footage of the killing.

Mr Schulz could face life in jail if found guilty.

The killing was first publicly revealed in March 2020 by ABC Investigations and Four Corners, sparking a three-year criminal investigation.

The court heard that the footage, from the helmet camera of a dog handler on Mr Schulz's patrol, showed an SAS dog attacking Dad Mohammad in a wheat field during an ADF mission in Uruzgan Province, in southern Afghanistan.

The dog is then called off and Mr Schulz is seen training his weapon on Dad Mohammad, who is lying on the ground.

The soldier is heard asking three times: "You want me to drop this c*nt*?" He then fires three shots at the man.

Mr Mohammad was in his 20s and a father of two girls - a newborn and toddler - at the time of his death.

He had a condition that stunted growth in one leg.

ABC Investigations and Four Corners identified the dead man and tracked down his father and brother during their investigation.

Afghan villagers first complained to the ADF about the killing months after the 2012 raid.

However, ADF investigators cleared Mr Schulz, concluding that Dad Mohammad was lawfully killed because he posed a direct threat to the Australians.

Investigators were told the Afghan man was holding a radio and "tactically manoeuvring".

Mr Schulz will face the Supreme Court in October for arraignment.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109567

File: 90a755ccee2bad0⋯.webm (14.61 MB,640x360,16:9,Clipboard.webm)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23484784 (201010ZAUG25) Notable: Video: Former SAS soldier Oliver Schulz committed to stand trial for war crimes charge of murder — Former SAS trooper Oliver Schulz, 43, will be the first Australian soldier to face trial for a war crimes charge after being committed to the NSW Supreme Court. He is accused of murdering Afghan villager Dad Mohammad in Uruzgan Province in 2012, an incident captured on helmet-cam and first exposed by ABC’s Four Corners. Footage showed Schulz asking, “You want me to drop this c*nt?” before firing three shots. Mohammad, a father of two, was initially deemed lawfully killed by ADF investigators. Schulz, charged in 2023, faces arraignment in October and could receive life in prison.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109566

2/2

Under the Commonwealth Criminal Code, a killing constitutes the war crime of murder if the victim is not a combatant or is out of action due to injury or damage.

Prosecutors must also prove that the perpetrator knew, or was reckless to, this fact.

The killing does not constitute a war crime if it occurred as a result of an attack on a military objective, during which the perpetrator did not expect excessive civilian casualties.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-08-20/former-sas-trooper-to-stand-trial-for-war-crime-charge-of-murder/105675766

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2020-11-18/igadf-inquiry-into-special-forces-in-afghanistan-is-over/12816626

https://qresear.ch/?q=Australian+SAS

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109568

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23484790 (201016ZAUG25) Notable: Video: Killing Field: Explosive new allegations of Australian special forces war crimes - A Four Corners investigation has uncovered new allegations that unarmed civilians were unlawfully killed by Australian special forces in Afghanistan. In an investigation months in the making, drawing upon sources in Australia and Afghanistan, our program will expose a culture of impunity and cover-up among members of Australia's special forces who served in Australia's longest war. - Four Corners / ABC News In-depth, 16 Mar 2020

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109566

Killing Field: Explosive new allegations of Australian special forces war crimes | Four Corners

ABC News In-depth

16 Mar 2020

A Four Corners investigation has uncovered new allegations that unarmed civilians were unlawfully killed by Australian special forces in Afghanistan.

In an investigation months in the making, drawing upon sources in Australia and Afghanistan, our program will expose a culture of impunity and cover-up among members of Australia's special forces who served in Australia's longest war.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-GPplTKCYpQ

Witnesses say Australian SAS soldiers killed unarmed Afghan civilians in potential war crimes

Mark Willacy, Rory Callinan and Alexandra Blucher - 16 Mar 2020

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2020-03-16/new-allegations-unarmed-civilians-killed-by-sas-in-afghanistan/12028448

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109569

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23489318 (211014ZAUG25) Notable: Video: Mines to Missiles: Kevin Rudd highlights Australia’s role in US critical minerals strategy — Australian ambassador to the US Kevin Rudd says Australia can help achieve Donald Trump’s goal of a resilient America by diversifying critical mineral and rare earth supply chains, calling Australia a “great power, if not a superpower” in the sector. He noted Trump hosted BHP and Rio Tinto chiefs to discuss a copper project in Arizona and cited 20–25 other US-based Australian mining projects. Speaking in Washington, Rudd compared critical minerals to munitions, highlighting their role in submarines and F-35s. He urged a coalition of allies to counter Chinese dominance and outlined Canberra’s $1.2bn strategic reserve and $3.4bn Critical Minerals Facility.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>73551 (pb)

>>73667 (pb)

>>109240

Mines to Missiles: Kevin Rudd highlights Australia’s role in US critical minerals strategy

JOE KELLY - 21 August 2025

1/2

Kevin Rudd says Australia can help diversify critical mineral and rare earth supply chains to help achieve Donald Trump’s goal of building a more resilient America while reducing Washington’s reliance on Beijing.

The nation’s top diplomat in America said this represented a major area of co-operation for Canberra and Washington, arguing that Australia was – in terms of critical minerals and rare earths – a “great power, if not a superpower.”

“That’s how nature has endowed us,” he said.

Dr Rudd argued it was possible to make “real, measurable, tangible progress” in countering Chinese dominance in critical minerals, but did not offer a timeline for when it was possible to catch-up with Beijing.

Noting that Australia was home to the largest mining companies in the world, Dr Rudd said the US President had hosted the chief executives of both BHP and Rio Tinto in the Oval Office on Tuesday local time to discuss a copper project in Arizona.

“The President recognises the size of these companies, their ability to act,” he said. “There are some 20 to 25 other projects in which the Australian mining industry is actively invested here in the US of A in the critical mineral space.”

“So put together what we’re investing here in the US with what was already invested in Australia, add to it a new layer of processing (and) we are then on the road to making a material difference in terms of securing supply chains of the future.”

Speaking at an event at the Center for Strategic and International Studies in Washington, the Australian ambassador to the US said that critical minerals should be viewed more like defence goods such as munitions or weapons systems.

“When you produce a Virginia class submarine, something we’re now working with the United States on … it contains within it something like 4.5 tonnes of critical minerals, rare earths, highly processed,” he said.

“You go to an F-35, you’re looking at a high proportion of the actual aircraft itself being derivative of advanced and processed rare earths.”

Dr Rudd said there were now governments in power both in Washington and Canberra that were “determined to turn the corner on this.”

“As a US ally, we are ready and able to help. And we have the capacity to do so,” he said.

He argued that it was important to see critical minerals and rare earths as the “flip side to what we’re doing with chips, what we’re doing with data centres and what we’re doing with artificial intelligence.”

“These are seamless elements of the future economic competitiveness of the United States in its global strategic competition with the People’s Republic of China,” he said. “If you don’t have it, well, kiss goodbye to your long term ability to produce chips, to produce data centres and to win the AI race across the world.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109570

File: 98074e278f5da8a⋯.jpg (2.36 MB,4032x2268,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: d9834b4bd47fd09⋯.jpg (324.18 KB,1616x1080,202:135,Clipboard.jpg)

File: c6462b0ea7db184⋯.jpg (195.47 KB,1920x1080,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 3b49f054d4f59e8⋯.jpg (214.17 KB,1920x1080,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23489330 (211025ZAUG25) Notable: Pro-Palestinian protest over Brisbane's Story Bridge won't be allowed, Queensland court rules — A Brisbane court has blocked a planned pro-Palestinian protest march across the Story Bridge after police argued it posed “a real and significant risk of safety.” Organisers expected 7,000 people, citing Sydney’s Harbour Bridge rally that drew nearly 100,000. Magistrate Janelle Brassington acknowledged the cause was “serious” but ruled the route unsafe due to bridge repairs and safety concerns. Police warned they would make arrests if protesters defy the order and noted risks of crowd crush. An alternative Victoria Bridge route was offered but rejected. Organisers said they respected but disagreed with the ruling and were considering an appeal.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109251

>>109458

>>109475

Pro-Palestinian protest over Brisbane's Story Bridge won't be allowed, Queensland court rules

Talissa Siganto - 21 August 2025

1/2

A pro-Palestinian march across Brisbane's Story Bridge has been banned from going ahead after police successfully argued it would be unsafe.

The protest, which was due to take place on Sunday, is part of nationwide action against the ongoing war in Gaza.

Organisers have indicated approximately 7,000 people are expected to attend the rally.

It follows a recent demonstration in NSW, which attracted almost 100,000 protesters who shut down the Sydney Harbour Bridge.

The Queensland Police Service (QPS) raised safety concerns, and, when mediation with organisers— which focused on trying to redirect the march — was unsuccessful, the matter ended up in court.

On Thursday, Queensland's chief magistrate Janelle Brassington said she was satisfied police had established "a real and significant risk of safety" due to the features of the bridge and surrounds.

Asked outside Brisbane Magistrates Court if protesters would march across the Story Bridge despite the ruling, organiser Remah Naj said they were considering the next steps.

"We are considering our options in terms of appeal and in terms of what the group will decide in the next few days," she said.

"While we do respect the magistrate ... we disagree."

Police Minister Dan Purdie called on event organisers to "respect the decision of the court".

"If protesters defy the decision of the court, it will not only put people at risk, it will also take hundreds of police away from responding to crime," he said in a statement.

Police could arrest protesters

Speaking on Thursday evening, QPS Acting Assistant Commissioner Rhys Wildman confirmed police would take "tactical and operational" actions, including arrests to prevent a protest from going ahead on Sunday.

He urged anyone considering taking part to reconsider, saying police generally supported protests going ahead, as long as they were safe.

"We have to make it quite clear that anyone participating in a protest which has not [been] authorised ... faces the prospect of enforcement action being taken against them, whether that's on the day or post-event," Acting Assistant Commissioner Wildman said.

He said police interpreted the court's decision to mean there was "no alternative route" and protesters were not authorised to "block any roadways or obstruct public spaces" on Sunday.

"We will take the appropriate enforcement action in a reasoned manner to prevent offences from occurring and [maintain] community safety," he told reporters.

Police resources would be available to respond on Sunday, should something go ahead, Acting Assistant Commissioner Wildman said.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109571

File: 58f05629bb43b38⋯.jpg (238.88 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: c55b4ee8acba299⋯.jpg (617.26 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: a9e0794c242e706⋯.jpg (224.34 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 590559febcf7597⋯.jpg (826.72 KB,895x1938,895:1938,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23494426 (221341ZAUG25) Notable: China demands Pacific nations roll back ‘erroneous’ Taiwan participation — China has urged Pacific Island nations to amend a 1992 communique granting Taiwan participation rights in the Pacific Islands Forum, calling it “erroneous” and contrary to the One China principle. In a statement from its embassy in Tonga, Beijing cited the precedent of last year’s removal of Taiwan references under Chinese pressure. The Solomon Islands, host of next month’s summit, has already excluded both Taiwan and China, later expanding the ban to all 21 dialogue partners — including the US, UK, EU, Japan and South Korea — provoking regional backlash. Tuvalu’s Prime Minister has threatened to boycott, while New Zealand and others insist partners must attend. Analysts warn Beijing may have “overstepped the mark.”

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109487

China demands Pacific nations roll back ‘erroneous’ Taiwan participation

AMANDA HODGE - August 20, 2025

China has demanded Pacific Island nations amend what it says is an “erroneous” 33-year-old communique recognising Taiwan’s right to participate in the region’s most important annual forum, raising the geopolitical stakes in what is shaping up to be a contentious leaders’ summit next month.

An extraordinary statement released on Tuesday by the Chinese embassy in Tonga forcefully rejects claims of Beijing interference in the Pacific Islands Forum as “misinformation”, even as it pushes for the bloc to amend a 1992 communique declaring Taiwan a Pacific Island Forum development partner with participation rights.

“The Taiwan-related content in the 1992 Forum Communique violated the One China principle in the first place,” the statement posted on the Chinese embassy’s social media account on Tuesday reads.

“Now more than 30 years later, China has established diplomatic relations with 11 of the 14 PICs (Pacific Island countries), and all these countries firmly adhere to the One China principle and clearly support China’s reunification,” it adds, referring to Beijing’s assertion that Taiwan is an “inalienable part of China. It is now time to correct the erroneous Taiwan-related content in the 1992 Forum Communique.”

The embassy statement cites as a precedent for its demands a highly controversial decision by Forum leaders last year to delete a reference to Taiwan - under pressure from China’s Special Envoy to the Pacific - from the final summit communique.

China’s relentless push to dismantle all support for Taiwan in the region and have it excluded from the Pacific Island Forum summit prompted the Solomon Islands, this year’s host and a nation that has grown increasingly close to Beijing, to announce last month that both countries would be excluded from the September meeting in Honiara.

Solomons Prime Minister Jeremiah Manele has since controversially expanded that decision to exclude all 21 Pacific Island Forum dialogue partners - including the UK, US, EU, Canada, Japan, South Korea, Indonesia and Malaysia - sparking mass frustration and accusations that China is seeking to interfere with Pacific regionalism and splinter the bloc.

The move was clearly intended to pacify those countries that still recognise Taiwan - Marshall Islands, Palau and Tuvalu - while also meeting China’s demands, but has pleased almost no one.

Australia and New Zealand - both full PIF member states who cannot be barred from next month’s summit - Fiji, PNG, Tuvalu and the Republic of Marshall Islands have all raised concerns over the decision.

“We want all dialogue partners to be there. We think that’s important,” NZ Prime Minister Christopher Luxon said this week.

Tuvalu Prime Minister Feleti Teo has threatened to boycott the summit over the exclusions, and in a recent interview speculated that China was behind the decision to block partners from the forum.

“There is no denying that China is trying to extend its footprint in the Pacific and so is the US,” Mr Teo told The Guardian.

Whether China sees the mass exclusion as a win is difficult to tell though its latest statement insists it gains nothing from being excluded.

While China’s Pacific presence and interest has grown exponentially in recent years, Anna Powles, associate professor of security studies at New Zealand’s Massey University, says Beijing’s latest demand is unlikely to be well received, even by nations firmly within Beijing’s camp.

“It’s going to be interesting to see how PIF members react to this latest statement by China that they should amend a collectively agreed declaration, and by extension the regional architecture,” Dr Powles told The Australian.

“I think China has overstepped the mark by calling for a change to an earlier Pacific Island forum declaration that would have been agreed to by leaders at the time. People in the region may find that quite unacceptable.”

China’s demand comes as Pacific Island nations have been discussing ways to better manage the intense and growing interest in the region by dividing partners into two tiers.

Many had hoped that process - aimed at preserving Pacific unity - would be finalised in Honiara, though Beijing’s latest diktat may have complicated that process.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/world/china-demands-pacific-nations-roll-back-erroneous-taiwan-participation/news-story/5a9d67d0e3de2984ca4bb456e11693bd

https://www.facebook.com/chinaembassytonga/posts/statement-by-the-chinese-embassy-in-tonga-on-recent-misinformation-concerning-th/1086464560286171/

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109572

File: 71a2c854e7f3162⋯.jpg (242.53 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: c824bbabe000540⋯.jpg (254.42 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 23c98a1b35a07e6⋯.jpg (162.2 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23494458 (221350ZAUG25) Notable: Xi Jinping’s man in Canberra warns: Taiwan’s return to China must not be denied — Chinese ambassador Xiao Qian has urged Anthony Albanese to adopt a “correct historical perspective,” declaring that “Taiwan’s return to China must not be denied.” Writing in The Australian, he linked Beijing’s sovereignty claims to World War II outcomes and UN Resolution 2758, which he said affirmed the PRC as China’s sole representative. Taiwan’s Foreign Minister Lin Chia-lung rejected this, stressing the PRC has “never ruled Taiwan for a single day” and likening Beijing’s claims to “the emperor’s new clothes.” Australia’s parliament last year condemned China’s use of the UN resolution to justify its claims, with bipartisan support for Taiwan’s participation in UN bodies.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>73422 (pb)

>>73569 (pb)

>>109230

>>109277

Xi Jinping’s man in Canberra warns: Taiwan’s return to China must not be denied

GEOFF CHAMBERS and BEN PACKHAM - August 21, 2025

1/2

Xi Jinping’s top diplomat in Australia has called on Anthony ­Albanese to uphold a “correct historical perspective” that Taiwan belongs to China, as he seeks to exploit the memory of World War II to push the Communist Party’s strategic aims.

Amid rising US concerns about a potential conflict with Beijing over Taiwan by 2027, Chinese ambassador Xiao Qian has invoked China and Australia fighting “side by side” against the Japanese in the 1940s to declare “Taiwan’s return to China must not be denied”.

Writing in the wake of the 80th anniversary of the end of one of Australia and China’s bloodiest modern conflicts, Mr Xiao claims one of the key outcomes of the war is that communist China – which took control of Beijing and the mainland four years after Japan’s surrender – has sovereignty over Taiwan.

“The recovery of Taiwan is a victorious outcome of Chinese People’s War of Resistance Against Japanese Aggression and the World Anti-Fascist War, and an important part of the post-war international order,” he writes in The Australian.

The ambassador’s use of World War II follows a speech last month by the Prime Minister during which he focused on Australia’s wartime prime minister John Curtin standing up to Winston Churchill and Franklin Roosevelt.

The Curtin Oration address sparked concerns in Washington, where US officials are reviewing the $368bn AUKUS nuclear-powered submarine pact and calling on Australia to lift defence spending to 3.5 per cent of GDP “as soon as possible” to help thwart Chinese military aggression in the Indo-Pacific region.

After Mr Albanese last week said he would formally recognise a Palestinian state when he attends the UN General Assembly in New York in September, Mr Xiao cites a disputed UN resolution that he claims “affirmed there is but one China, the government of the People’s Republic of China”.

“Some seek to challenge the authority of UNGA Resolution 2758, calling Taiwan’s status ‘undetermined’, falsely claiming that the PRC has never governed Taiwan, and fudging and hollowing out the one-China principle,” Mr Xiao wrote in The Australian.

“To uphold the one-China principle, and to oppose ‘Taiwan independence’ and external interference, is an inevitable requirement for safeguarding China’s sovereignty and territorial integrity, the foundation and prerequisite for ensuring peace and stability across the ­Taiwan Strait, and a just cause ­defending the outcomes of the victory in the Second World War and the post-war international order.”

Taiwan Foreign Minister Lin Chia-lung hit back at the ambassador’s interpretation of the UN resolution, pointing to the fact “the People’s Republic of China from 1949 has never ruled Taiwan for a single day”.

“The resolution is around 158 words, but none of these words have anything to do with Taiwan. Taiwan is not mentioned,” Dr Lin told The Australian in Taipei.

“I think it was the Australian parliament which first passed the resolution that rejected China’s claims on UNGA Resolution 2758 saying that it determined Taiwan’s status.

“And especially, starting from last year, the State Department of the US has continued and repeatedly expressed that we should refute these distortions by China.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109573

File: b9c650bc99cb179⋯.jpg (325.38 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23494499 (221400ZAUG25) Notable: COMMENTARY: Australia and China share history of triumph in war on fascism"During one of humanity’s darkest hours, China and Australia stood firmly as allies in the fight against fascism… The shared memory of China and Australia standing together in mutual support and united resistance deserves to be cherished and remembered by our two peoples. Eighty years ago, Taiwan was returned to China, with the recognition of major victorious nations and Japan. The recovery of Taiwan is a victorious outcome of the Chinese people’s resistance against Japanese aggression and an important part of the post-war international order. Resolution 2758… settled once and for all the political, legal and procedural issues regarding the representation of the whole of China, including Taiwan, at the UN. China and Australia forged friendship in times of hardship. Today… China is ready to work with Australia and all peace-loving nations to uphold a correct historical perspective, to defend international fairness and justice, and a bright future for China-Australia relations." – Xiao Qian, China’s ambassador to Australia – The Australian.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109559

>>109572

COMMENTARY: Australia and China share history of triumph in war on fascism

XIAO QIAN - August 21, 2025

1/2

Recently, a series of commemorative events has been held across Australia to mark the 80th anniversary of the end of WWII. Together with peoples around the world, China will also hold a gathering to mark the 80th anniversary of the victory in the Chinese people’s war of resistance against Japanese aggression and the world anti-fascist war.

During one of humanity’s darkest hours, China and Australia stood firmly as allies in the fight against fascism, making important contributions to the defence of world peace and justice. Yet, for too long, the enormous sacrifices made by the Chinese people, the historic contribution of China to the victory in the world anti-fascist war, and the shared struggle of China and Australia have often been neglected or overlooked. The smoke of war may have long dispersed, but the glory of that struggle must never fade into oblivion.

To uphold a correct historical perspective of WWII is not only to restore historical truth, but also to safeguard the fruits of victory, to cherish peace, and to open up a brighter future. In this spirit, I wish to share three points. First, the strategic importance of the Chinese battlefield must not be underestimated. Influenced by the Western-centric historical view, some tend to focus primarily on the European theatre of World War II while downplaying the decisive role of the China theatre. As noted in the China-Australia jointly made documentary, The War That Changed the World, the Chinese people’s war of resistance against Japanese aggression marked the outbreak of the world anti-fascist war and opened the first large-scale anti-fascist battlefield in the East.

Starting the earliest and lasting the longest in the war, China’s resistance led to more than 35 million casualties in the fight for the nation’s survival. As the main battlefield in Asia, China made an immense historic contribution to the global victory over fascism. The Communist Party of China held high the banner of the national united front against Japanese aggression, safeguarded the unity of resistance, and stood as the pillar of the entire nation’s resistance.

China’s resistance greatly weakened Japan’s capacity to expand into the Asia-Pacific, disrupted its attempts at strategic coordination with Nazi Germany, and bought precious time for other anti-fascist nations. This played an important role in ensuring coordination among the Allies’ fronts and the smooth implementation of the overall strategy. Research by institutions such as the Australian National University has shown China’s resistance paved the way for victories of anti-fascist allies in the Pacific theatre. Without China’s prolonged struggle, Japan might have shifted its forces to Southeast Asia and even towards Australia at a much earlier time.

Second, the shared history of China and Australia fighting side by side must not be forgotten. The peoples of China and Australia, standing firm for justice and fighting side by side amid the flames of war, made immense sacrifices to secure the great victory of the world anti-fascist war.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109574

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23494538 (221412ZAUG25) Notable: ‘Forever tarnished’: Benjamin Netanyahu steps up criticism of Anthony Albanese - Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has escalated attacks on Anthony Albanese, declaring the Australian leader’s record is “forever tarnished” by recognising a Palestinian state. He said Hamas’s welcome of the move showed “you know something is wrong,” and accused Albanese of “weakness” in confronting “terrorist monsters.” Netanyahu announced a Pacific Islands tour by his deputy foreign minister to deepen ties with loyal supporters such as PNG, Fiji and Palau. He warned of a “tsunami” of anti-Semitic attacks in Australia and cited Churchill’s “slumber of democracies.” Albanese declined to retaliate publicly, while Health Minister Mark Butler dismissed the criticism as “frankly ridiculous.”

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109251

>>109521

>>109562

>>109563

‘Forever tarnished’: Benjamin Netanyahu steps up criticism of Anthony Albanese

RHIANNON DOWN and BEN PACKHAM - August 21, 2025

1/2

Israel will move to strengthen ties with its loyal Pacific Island supporters with a tour of states in Australia’s immediate region, as Jewish State leader Benjamin Netanyahu declares Anthony Albanese will be “forever tarnished” by his recognition of a Palestinian state.

In an interview with Sky News host Sharri Markson, the Israeli Prime Minister doubled down on his criticism of Mr Albanese’s support for a two-state solution, declaring that when Hamas welcomed a decision “you know something is wrong”.

“I’m sure he [Mr Albanese] has a reputable record as a public servant, but I think his record is forever tarnished by the weakness he has shown in the face of these Hamas terrorist monsters,” Mr Netanyahu said.

“When the worst terrorist ­organisation on earth – these savages who murdered women, raped them, beheaded men, burnt babies alive in front of their parents and took hundreds of hostages – when these people congratulate the Prime Minister of Australia, you know something is wrong.”

His comments came as his Foreign Minister, Gideon Sa’ar, ordered his deputy, Sharren Haskel, to prepare for an official tour of Pacific Island states. Pacific Island states including Papua New Guinea, Fiji, Nauru, Palau, Tuvalu and Tonga, are among Israel’s staunchest supporters, backing the Jewish state in key UN votes.

“Deputy Foreign Minister Haskel will lead the delegation to engage in discussions aimed at deepening and advancing Israel–Pacific relations in a wide range of bilateral, multilateral, and strategic fields,” Israel’s Foreign Ministry said in a statement on X.

“The Pacific Island states constitute an important focus of support for Israel across various international frameworks.

“This support is expressed bilaterally – most notably through the establishment of official embassies in Jerusalem, Israel’s capital, as exemplified by Papua New Guinea in 2023 and as additional states intend to pursue in the near future — as well as multilaterally, including through significant backing of Israel within the United Nations.”

It said the tour ­reflected “Israel’s profound appreciation for the Pacific Island states and underscores Israel’s commitment to strengthening co-operation with them”.

The tour announcement came as Australia’s relationship with Israel fell to a new low this week, after Mr Netanyahu accused Mr Albanese of abandoning Australian Jews in a scathing letter retaliating to Labor’s decision to recognise Palestine and deny visas to Israeli political figures.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109575

File: 12e7c2759e62490⋯.jpg (324.05 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 989ec052c342d50⋯.jpg (299.06 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: f28d156a76decc9⋯.jpg (1.36 MB,1123x1478,1123:1478,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23502068 (240817ZAUG25) Notable: Australia ‘harbouring criminal’, says Hong Kong in new row over asylum for activist - Hong Kong’s Chief Secretary Chan Kwok-ki has accused Australia of “harbouring a criminal” after Adelaide-based activist Ted Hui was granted asylum, summoning consul-general Gareth Williams to protest “interfering in China’s internal affairs.” Hui, a former Hong Kong legislator facing national security charges, dismissed the threats, saying officials “know they cannot change the situation now that the visa has been granted.” The dispute follows Britain’s granting of asylum to student leader Tony Chung. DFAT said Australia was concerned by Hong Kong’s broad application of the security law, stressing support for freedoms of expression and assembly. Hui has urged sanctions on officials responsible for human rights abuses.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109554

Australia ‘harbouring criminal’, says Hong Kong in new row over asylum for activist

STEPHEN RICE - August 22, 2025

1/2

A fresh diplomatic row with China is brewing after the Hong Kong government called in Australia’s consul-general, Gareth Williams, to protest against Australia’s grant of political asylum to pro-democracy activist Ted Hui, accusing the Albanese government of “interfering in China’s internal affairs”.

Hong Kong’s Chief Secretary, Chan Kwok-ki, summoned Mr Williams to express his government’s anger at the asylum granted last week to Mr Hui, accusing Australia of “harbouring a criminal” and vowing to keep pursuing “the fugitive”.

The former Hong Kong lawmaker fled Hong Kong while on bail in December 2020 after he was hit with criminal charges under national security laws over his role in pro-democracy protests.

Mr Hui told The Australian he was not concerned about the Hong Kong government’s threat to keep hunting him.

“They are doing it in a very high-profile (way), and they are jumping up and down, but they know they cannot change the situation now that the visa has been granted,” he said.

Mr Hui said it was unusual his case was now being handled by the Hong Kong government rather than the foreign office in China.

“Perhaps it’s something that’s too big for them, so they have to break protocol and do it in a higher profile to make their position clear to Australia and the international community,” he said.

Mr Hui memorably threw rotten plants on the floor of Hong Kong’s Legislative Council chamber in 2020 to protest at the National Security Law, saying it symbolised the decay of Hong Kong’s political system.

He was given a special travel exemption to enter Australia with his wife and children in March 2021 during the pandemic and now lives in Adelaide, practising as a lawyer.

The British consul-general in Hong Kong, Brian Davidson, was also called in for a dressing-down on Tuesday after the UK granted refugee status to student leader Tony Chung, who was convicted under the national security law of calling for Hong Kong’s secession.

The chief secretary demanded the Australian and British governments “immediately stop interfering in Hong Kong affairs, which are purely China’s internal affairs”.

In a statement released after meeting the two diplomats, Mr Chan expressed “strong opposition to the granting of asylum to two Hong Kong fugitives endangering national security who have absconded overseas”.

The Australian understands Mr Williams made it clear to Mr Chan that Australia was troubled by Hong Kong’s continued pursuit of Mr Hui.

A Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade spokesperson said the Australian government had consistently expressed concerns about the broad, extraterritorial application of Hong Kong’s National Security Law to arrest or pressure pro-democracy figures.

“Freedom of expression and assembly are essential to democracy, and we support people who exercise these rights. We have raised our concerns directly with China and with Hong Kong authorities,” the spokesperson said.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109576

File: ad3044b502359c2⋯.jpg (182.28 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 4eec629a62b2d29⋯.jpg (379.72 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 5fe4326964333d5⋯.jpg (282.97 KB,895x834,895:834,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 3fdae6f1383efd8⋯.jpg (3.09 MB,1878x3101,1878:3101,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23502072 (240829ZAUG25) Notable: ‘Sheltering criminals’: China ramps up attack over asylum for Hong Kong activist - Beijing has escalated its condemnation of Australia’s decision to grant asylum to Hong Kong activist Ted Hui, with the Chinese embassy quoting Foreign Ministry spokesperson Mao Ning calling Hui “an anti-China agitator… lawfully wanted by Hong Kong police” and denouncing “any country sheltering criminals in any form.” The backlash follows Hong Kong’s Chief Secretary summoning Australia’s consul-general last week. China Daily carried fierce commentary, with barrister Grenville Cross branding Hui “a vile criminal fugitive” and accusing Canberra of “demeaning itself.” Hui, who fled Hong Kong in 2020, now lives in Adelaide. Meanwhile, Melbourne-based lawyer Kevin Yam was struck off the roll of Hong Kong solicitors in Hong Kong and fined $160,000 after calling for sanctions.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109554

>>109575

‘Sheltering criminals’: China ramps up attack over asylum for Hong Kong activist

STEPHEN RICE - 24 August 2025

China has ramped up its attack on the Albanese government for giving political asylum to Hong Kong pro-democracy activist Ted Hui, condemning Australia for “sheltering criminals” after last week accusing Canberra of interfering in China’s internal affairs.

Late on Friday, the Chinese embassy in Australia posted on its official Facebook account a statement by Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Mao Ning that Mr Hui “is an anti-China agitator who disrupts Hong Kong’s order and is lawfully wanted by Hong Kong police” and condemning “any country sheltering criminals in any form”.

The move comes after Hong Kong’s Chief Secretary, Chan Kwok-ki, called in Australia’s ­consul-general, Gareth Williams, last week to express his government’s anger at the asylum granted to Mr Hui, and vowed to keep pursuing “the fugitive”.

The former Hong Kong politician fled Hong Kong while on bail in December 2020 after he was hit with criminal charges under the National Security Law over his role in pro-democracy protests; he now lives in Adelaide, working as a lawyer.

Australia’s grant of asylum last week to Mr Hui – and an almost simultaneous grant by Britain of refugee status to student leader Tony Chung – has come at a sensitive moment for Hong Kong as the landmark sedition trial of democracy activist and newspaper publisher Jimmy Lai comes to a close, with a guilty verdict all but certain.

In an interview with The Australian last week, Mr Hui pleaded with the Albanese government to impose sanctions on Hong Kong officials responsible for human rights abuses.

Commentators in the China Daily, a newspaper owned and controlled by the Central Propaganda Department of the Chinese Communist Party, have launched vitriolic attacks on Mr Hui in recent days.

Barrister and former Hong Kong director of public prosecutions Grenville Cross described Mr Hui as a “vile criminal fugitive” and said Canberra had “demeaned itself” by giving him sanctuary.

Mr Cross is a regular cheerleader in the China Daily for Hong Kong’s National Security Law, and for the $HK1m cash bounty ($197,000) offered for the arrest and conviction of Mr Hui and other pro-democracy activists.

“That Canberra should have embraced a figure like Hui is offensive to right-thinking people everywhere. A common criminal who lied to the courts, he is a worthless individual,” Mr Cross said. “To grant Hui asylum was a calculated insult to China and an affront to the rule of law.”

Mr Cross claimed the Albanese government had “shamefully turned a blind eye to his anti-China activities”, which included “close liaison with subversive elements” in Britain UK and the US.

“No civilised society should have any truck with serial offenders like Hui, and Canberra has demeaned itself by letting him stay,” he said.

Noting Mr Hui’s fear that someone might try to kidnap him and send him back to Hong Kong or China illegally, he said: “He will never know for sure who he can trust or where he can go. Nobody need feel any pity. He will forever be looking over his shoulder.”

Meanwhile, Hong Kong legal authorities launched new punitive measures against Melbourne-based pro-democracy lawyer Kevin Yam who, like Mr Hui, has a $HK1m reward on his head.

At the weekend, Mr Yam revealed he had been struck off the roll of Hong Kong solicitors, and hit with a $160,000 bill for the cost of the disciplinary hearing.

The proceedings were sparked by his call for sanctions against Hong Kong lawyers who participated in the persecution of democracy activists under the China-­imposed National Security Law.

In a statement at the weekend Mr Yam said he could not stand by “while those who supposedly lead and represent the Hong Kong legal profession have at best quietly acquiesced to, and at worst been enthusiastically complicit in, the post-National Security Law crackdown.”

Mr Yam has been the target of anonymous leaflets dropped around Melbourne calling for him to be kidnapped and taken back to Hong Kong.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/sheltering-criminals-china-ramps-up-attack-over-asylum-for-hong-kong-activist/news-story/44d4f5b722122c40c3ad0aad5ef67c8f

https://www.facebook.com/ChinainAus/posts/1075842294756502

https://www.chinadailyasia.com/hk/article/618096

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109577

File: ece897c1a6aee9b⋯.jpg (346.4 KB,1500x1125,4:3,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 8fd25b7ae6dd8ef⋯.jpg (1.78 MB,5000x3334,2500:1667,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 791cad4ff0bba26⋯.jpg (284.15 KB,1000x1333,1000:1333,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 0cd180510bc850f⋯.jpg (123.2 KB,940x1253,940:1253,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23502080 (240837ZAUG25) Notable: Queensland government announces new child sex offender registry with personal details of offenders – Queensland will introduce “Daniel’s Law,” creating a public child sex offender register named after Daniel Morcombe, the teenager abducted and murdered in 2003. The legislation, to be passed before year’s end, establishes a website listing reportable offenders who abscond or fail obligations, displaying names, ages, and photos. Queenslanders will also be able to apply for images of high-risk offenders in their area, and parents may ask police whether adults with unsupervised access to their children are on the register. Premier David Crisafulli said victims’ rights come before offenders’ rights, while Bruce and Denise Morcombe welcomed the reform as their son’s legacy. They believe it will deter breaches and provide families with a vital safety tool.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Queensland government announces new child sex offender registry with personal details of offenders

Jack McKay - 24 August 2025

Queenslanders will be able to apply for images of child sex offenders who live in their area under new laws that will be introduced to state parliament this week.

The legislation, dubbed Daniel's Law, was named in honour of Sunshine Coast teenager Daniel Morcombe, who was abducted and murdered in 2003.

The reforms would create a new public child sex offender register, which is something the LNP pledged to set up at the state election last October.

Under the changes, the government would establish a website that listed reportable offenders who failed to comply with their obligations or were hiding from police.

Personal details to be shared on database

Premier David Crisafulli said the offender's name, age, and photo would be featured on the webpage.

"If you commit hideous crimes and you try to hide, Queenslanders deserve to know who you are and where you are to keep our kids safe," he said.

Mr Crisafulli said the planned law changes would also allow Queenslanders to apply for images of high-risk reportable offenders in their local area.

People making such searches would not be granted access to other personal information, such as the offender's age or their name.

"Parents have a right to protect their kids, and they have a right to be vigilant to the risks in their community," Mr Crisafulli said.

"We believe the rights of victims and the rights of parents come before the rights of offenders and the rights of paedophiles."

'Daniel's Law' by the end of the year

Another element of the reforms would enable parents and carers to apply to police to determine if an adult having unsupervised contact with their child was a reportable offender.

Mr Crisafulli outlined the details of the proposed reforms at the LNP convention in Brisbane on Sunday, with legislation set to be introduced to parliament this week and pass before the end of the year.

He said more details would be released in the coming days, including new offences and safeguards to prevent people from misusing the information on the register.

"In this important moment, I want to acknowledge the advocacy of [Daniel's parents] Bruce and Denise Morcombe," the premier said.

"They are incredible Queenslanders, who from unfathomable pain have fought for change."

Morcombes welcome change

Mr Morcombe welcomed the reforms and said it would make a difference in keeping kids safe.

"It's good news in recognising Daniel's tragedy and makes something positive come out to protect Queenslanders," he said.

"At the end of the day, we have always put one foot in front of the other to make sure that what happened to Daniel never happens to other kids.

"This is Daniel's legacy at work. Daniel's Law will make a difference and we're really quite honoured that this legislation is named after Daniel."

Mr Morcombe believed the register would act as a deterrent to potential offenders, as well as to convicted offenders who breach their court orders.

"They will think twice before they wish to abscond or not follow the court orders as required," he said.

"I think the deterrent factor is underplayed, but I think its potential benefit will be really sound and a strong force to keep Queenslanders safe."

Mr Morcombe also acknowledged the proposed law changes were not a silver bullet.

"It's possible [someone has] done stuff and never been caught," he said.

"We all understand that, but at least it's a level of security that mum, dad, grandparents, and carers have that ability to check."

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-08-24/new-child-sex-offender-registry-daniels-law/105690778

https://qresear.ch/?q=Daniel+Morcombe

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109578

File: b66fc306587614e⋯.jpg (275.6 KB,1600x1200,4:3,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23508392 (252257ZAUG25) Notable: ‘Shameful’: Far-right Israeli MP speaks out on visa cancellation - Israeli MP Simcha Rothman has denied describing Gazan children as enemies, claiming his remarks were misconstrued, and labelled Australia’s cancellation of his visa “shameful.” Speaking at an online event organised by the conservative Australian Jewish Association, Rothman said views cited by Home Affairs — support for eliminating Hamas and opposing a Palestinian state — were “mainstream” in Israel. He urged Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to conquer Gaza City, reject hostage deals, and extend sovereignty over the West Bank, which he called “the homeland of the Jewish people.” Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke defended the cancellation, warning Rothman could spread division in Australia. The decision has intensified diplomatic tensions with Israel.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109521

>>109555

>>109561

>>109562

‘Shameful’: Far-right Israeli MP speaks out on visa cancellation

Matthew Knott - August 24, 2025

1/2

The far-right Israeli politician who was blocked from travelling to Australia, triggering a fiery spat between the two nations, has claimed his visa was cancelled for expressing mainstream Israeli views as he denied referring to Gazan children as enemies of his nation.

The Albanese government’s decision to cancel Israeli parliamentarian Simcha Rothman’s visa for a planned speaking tour last week prompted a ferocious response, with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu branding Australian counterpart Anthony Albanese “weak” and his government cancelling the visas of Australian diplomats working in the occupied West Bank.

Speaking at an online event organised by the conservative Australian Jewish Association on Sunday night, Rothman said he believed the cancellation of his visa was a “shameful” attempt to silence Israelis who have different political views to the Australian government.

Rothman said quotes cited by the Department of Home Affairs to justify the refusal of his visa – including support for the elimination of Hamas and opposition to a two-state solution – were commonplace in Israel.

“The threat is that they are outlawing basically the views of the State of Israel and of most of the Jewish people,” he said, citing a vote last year in the Israeli parliament in which a vast majority of politicians voted against the creation of a Palestinian state.

Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke has said the key reason for the decision to block Rothman from travelling to Australia was that he had described Gazan children as enemies of Israel in a May interview with Britain’s Channel 4.

“It was a quote by the journalist. I never said that children in Gaza are our enemies,” Rothman told the online event. “I did not say it. I said, ‘The Gazans are our enemies’.”

In the interview Rothman replied that “they are our enemies” when asked about children in Gaza, although some defenders have argued that his comments have been misconstrued.

A nine-page Home Affairs Department record of the Rothman decision said that Rothman could have used his planned speaking tour to Australia to “continue making inflammatory statements to promote his controversial views and ideologies, which may lead to fostering division in the community”.

Burke defended the decision by saying: “Our government takes a hard line on people who seek to come to our country and spread division. Under our government, Australia will be a country where everyone can be safe, and feel safe.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109579

File: 36ddebb8f0122b5⋯.jpg (89.18 KB,1694x953,1694:953,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 66913da34a13ab9⋯.mp4 (7.52 MB,480x848,30:53,Clipboard.mp4)

File: 7032bb2bb9608e5⋯.jpg (672.84 KB,2048x1536,4:3,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 666180fe6d1a632⋯.jpg (277.38 KB,1600x900,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23508523 (252329ZAUG25) Notable: Video: Man charged over series of graffiti attacks on Melbourne synagogue - A 37-year-old South Yarra man has been charged with more than 20 offences over six graffiti attacks on the Melbourne Hebrew Congregation between March and August. Graffiti included “Iran Is Da Bomb” and “Free Palestine,” painted on the synagogue’s facade. Police allege he arrived alone on an e-scooter each time, and seized items linked to the vandalism at his home. He faces charges including six counts of criminal damage, offensive graffiti, unlicensed driving, and failing to stop for police. Rabbi Shlomo Nathanson welcomed the charges, saying justice will be served and expressing hope it deters future acts of “hateful, discriminatory lawlessness.”

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109251

>>109252

>>109286

Man charged over series of graffiti attacks on Melbourne synagogue

LILY MCCAFFREY - 25 August 2025

A man has been charged with more than 20 offences in relation to a series of graffiti attacks on a Melbourne synagogue.

Police arrested and charged a 37-year-old man on Monday in relation to six separate instances of criminal damage that occurred at the Melbourne Hebrew Congregation on Toorak Road in South Yarra, in Melbourne’s inner south.

The incidents occurred on March 11, June 21, June 22, July 22, July 30 and August 19 this year.

Photos from one incident at the synagogue in June show a mushroom cloud containing the words “Iran Is Da Bomb” in red paint on the synagogue’s facade, close to a second tag with the words “Free Palestine”.

Detectives executed a search warrant on Monday morning at the South Yarra man’s home where they seized items allegedly related to the offending, Victoria Police said in a statement.

Police arrested the man and charged him with six counts of criminal damage, six counts of marking offensive graffiti, five counts of using an unregistered motor vehicle, five counts of unlicensed driving and one count of failing to stop on police direction.

The man was bailed to appear at the Melbourne Magistrates Court on November 21.

Police had released CCTV footage this month of a man they believed was involved in the vandalism. Each time, he arrived alone at the synagogue on a black e-scooter and spray-painted offensive phrases on the walls, police alleged.

During the July incidents, the man wore a mask similar to one used in the horror film series Scream, which completely covered his face, police said.

Melbourne Hebrew Congregation rabbi Shlomo Nathanson told The Australian he was very grateful to the team at Victoria Police who had worked on the case.

“Whilst there was a limited resource to put on the case, they certainly have brought about justice with the outcome here,” Rabbi Nathanson said on Monday after police laid the charges.

“In this very heightened tension in the political arena that we’re feeling across the community, we’re happy that the law of the land and justice can be carried out, and that the laws that are in place to prevent hateful, discriminatory lawlessness like we’ve seen at the Melbourne Hebrew Synagogue and at other places of worship and Jewish sites across the state, that justice will be served there, and hopefully it will be a deterrent for those that have chosen violence over dialogue.

“Our hope is certainly that we can correct the path and get back to a space of mutual respect, a fair go for all, like the Australian values, rather than the hatred and the lawlessness that we’ve experienced since October 7.”

This comes after the Victorian Joint Counter Terrorism Team last week arrested a second man in relation to an arson attack that severely damaged the Adass Israel Synagogue in Ripponlea in December.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/man-charged-over-series-of-graffiti-attacks-on-melbourne-synagogue/news-story/a863b73d35e304ae70243dedb64ad4a2

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/congregation-exhausted-after-proiranian-vandals-again-target-synagogue/news-story/198f1a42f7cfd14469f12b1eced2b91b

https://combatantisemitism.org/cam-news/iran-is-da-bomb-historic-melbourne-synagogue-vandalized-with-antisemitic-hate-graffiti/

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109580

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23508657 (260002ZAUG25) Notable: Video: Queensland Premier David Crisafulli condemns protester for flying Hamas’ flag during Brisbane Palestine rally - Police are investigating after a Hamas flag was flown at a 10,000-strong pro-Palestinian rally in Brisbane. Premier David Crisafulli called the act “horrendous” and said the protester must face “the full force of law.” Federal opposition spokesman Andrew Hastie and Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke said terrorist symbols have no place in Australia. Hava Mendelle of the Minority Impact Coalition said the act showed “support for radicalism.” Queensland Jewish Board president Jason Steinberg said the community was “sickened” by Hamas and jihadist flags. Organiser Remah Naji refused to condemn the flag, stressing the rally’s broader message.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109475

>>109476

>>109478

Queensland Premier David Crisafulli condemns protester for flying Hamas’ flag during Brisbane Palestine rally

BIMINI PLESSER - 25 August 2025

1/2

Queensland Premier David Crisafulli has condemned the “horrendous” actions a protester who carried a Hamas flag at Brisbane’s pro-Palestine rally on Sunday.

Police are investigating after the terrorist organisation’s flag was flown above a crowd of 10,000 Queenslanders as they marched through the city’s CBD.

Acting assistant commissioner Rhys Wildman said displaying the terror symbol in public was a commonwealth offence, which could result in a jail sentence.

“It is being investigated and we are taking that matter very, very seriously,” Mr Wildman said.

A Queensland police spokeswoman confirmed on Monday that the matter was being investigated, but no charges had been laid.

Mr Crisafulli slammed the rogue protester’s actions.

“It’s just horrendous, and that individual should bear the full force of law,” Mr Crisafulli said in Toowoomba.

“That individual can’t get away with that, because … that is provocative, it’s inciteful, it’s anti-Semitic, and it’s the kind of behaviour that we don’t see in this state, in this nation.”

Federal opposition home affairs spokesman Andrew Hastie expressed a similar sentiment, saying Australians were “tired of seeing ancient hatreds spill out on to our streets”.

“It’s unacceptable that in Australia we have the flags of terrorist organisations being paraded across our capital cities,” Mr Hastie said.

“Those responsible should be prosecuted to the full extent of the law.”

Federal Home Affairs minister Tony Burke said terrorist symbols have no place in Australia.

“That flag is a hate symbol, and there are laws against hate symbols because they were put in place by the Albanese Labor government,” he said.

“Wherever hate symbols are shown, I hope those thresholds are met, because we passed those laws for the simple reason that we want them enforced, people have a right to feel safe and be safe in Australia.

“Hate symbols are about attacking our social cohesion and they have no place here.”

Hava Mendelle from the Minority Impact Coalition, a Queensland-based collaboration of refugees and minorities, said flying the Hamas flag was “very un-Australian”.

“It’s actually really concerning for everyone, not just for the Jewish minorities, but all Australians in general … that there’s such support for radicalism in the form of terrorism,” Ms Mendelle said.

“The man that was carrying the flag was masked, he was wearing a keffiyeh, so they obviously knew they were doing something illegal.”

Ms Mendelle said she was disappointed at the inaction of other protesters at the rally.

“If it was indeed one bad egg or a plant, where was the outrage of the crowd of protesters standing around that flag?” she said.

“If they are a peaceful march, they want peace for Palestinians – which, by the way, I can align with, I also want freedom for Palestinian people – where was the outrage at showing terror flags of a terror group that is using the Palestinian people and actually making their lives more dangerous and increasing their suffering?”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109581

File: b8614846aac1dbc⋯.jpg (598.91 KB,895x1323,895:1323,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 3aadccbee50fc98⋯.jpg (181.31 KB,960x1016,120:127,Clipboard.jpg)

File: c56e9f7497de0a5⋯.jpg (98.17 KB,1145x640,229:128,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23508828 (260042ZAUG25) Notable: Mysterious Chinese billion-dollar proposed deal in Nauru sparks concern in Canberra - Australia is pressing Nauru for details of a claimed AU$1bn investment agreement signed with the little-known “China Rural Revitalisation and Development Corporation.” The deal, announced by Nauru’s foreign minister Lionel Aingimea, promises investment in sectors from renewable energy to fisheries, but analysts doubt its plausibility, noting no record of the company exists. Under a new treaty signed with Nauru last year, Canberra holds effective veto power over national security decisions, prompting Pacific Minister Pat Conroy to warn that Article 5 may be triggered. Experts suggest the proposal could be “theatre” ahead of Nauru’s September election.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109248

>>109487

>>109571

>>109547

Mysterious Chinese billion-dollar proposed deal in Nauru sparks concern in Canberra

Stephen Dziedzic, Iris Zhao and Hugo Hodge - 19 August 2025

1/2

Australia has pressed Nauru for more detail about a claimed billion-dollar investment agreement that it has signed with a mysterious Chinese company, as federal government officials scramble to ensure the Pacific nation is not breaching a landmark treaty it signed with Australia just nine months ago.

Last week, Nauru's government announced that its foreign minister, Lionel Aingimea, had signed a "phase 1 investment project proposal … valued at approximately AU$1 billion" with a Chinese company called the "China Rural Revitalisation and Development Corporation (CRRDC)".

But the ABC has not been able to track down any information about the company, and Pacific analysts say that scale of investment doesn't seem plausible for Nauru, which has a population of just 12,000.

Late last year, Australia signed a sweeping new treaty with Nauru, promising to provide ongoing budget and security support in return for effective veto power of decisions on national security.

The pacific minister, Pat Conroy, said that Australian officials were checking that Nauru wasn't contemplating any investments which might breach the agreement.

"(DFAT) is engaging with the government of Nauru about whether (the announcement) activates part of our treaty with Nauru, particularly Article 5 of the treaty," Mr Conroy said.

"That is a really important treaty for us that helps position us as the security partner of choice of Nauru."

The ABC understands Foreign Minister Penny Wong also raised the issue with Mr Aingimea when they were both in Fiji last week to attend the Pacific Islands Forum Foreign Ministers meeting.

Article 5 of the treaty says Australia needs to "mutually agree" with any security arrangements Nauru makes, including on maritime security, defence, policing, border protection, cyber security, and some critical infrastructure.

In its statement, Nauru said that the Phase 1 proposal would focus on "developing key sectors in Nauru", including "renewable energy, the phosphate industry, marine fisheries and sea infrastructure, water resource and environmental system, modern agriculture systems, eco-tourism, green transport system, health and cultural exchange platforms".

It also said a "scoping team" from the company would come to Nauru in October to develop a "road up" for the investments.

But Nauru's government hasn't provided any information beyond that statement.

The ABC contacted Nauru on Tuesday to seek a response to Mr Conroy's comments, but it didn't immediately reply.

The assistant minister for the Pacific, Nita Green, travelled to Nauru this week to open a Commonwealth Bank branch — delivering on an Australian government commitment under the treaty to ensure the Pacific nation wasn't left without a bank in the wake of Bendigo's withdrawal.

But it is not clear if she raised the proposed investment in her meeting with Mr Aingimea and Nauru's president, David Adeang.

One Australian government source, speaking on the condition of anonymity, said there were "zero detail" available on the proposed deal, and they doubted it would ever transpire.

Graeme Smith from the Australian National University also told the ABC that the proposal was "highly unlikely" to bring in a billion dollars to Nauru because its economy simply wasn't large enough to sustain such an investment.

"I think Nauru is having their chain yanked, and I think it would be the height of foolishness for Australia to overreact and assume that this thing is actually going to happen," he said.

"I would put it up there with Manly winning the premiership this year."

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109582

File: 92fe658f40c7ee2⋯.jpg (1.06 MB,5040x3359,5040:3359,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 2ccc7dcea77659e⋯.jpg (1.03 MB,4180x2858,2090:1429,Clipboard.jpg)

File: e71b858fd54ecc6⋯.jpg (341.34 KB,937x1418,937:1418,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23509012 (260137ZAUG25) Notable: Epstein, Prince Andrew accuser Virginia Giuffre wrote a memoir. It’s coming out months after her death - A posthumous memoir by Jeffrey Epstein accuser Virginia Roberts Giuffre, Nobody’s Girl: A Memoir of Surviving Abuse and Fighting for Justice, will be released October 21 by Knopf. Giuffre, who died in April aged 41, had completed the 400-page manuscript with co-author Amy Wallace. In an April 1 email, she wrote it was her “heartfelt wish” the book be published “regardless” of her circumstances, stressing the need to expose “systemic failures” in trafficking. Knopf says the memoir contains “intimate, disturbing and heartbreaking” new details about Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell and Prince Andrew, about whom she speaks publicly for the first time since their 2022 settlement.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109289

>>109443

>>109473

>>109474

Epstein, Prince Andrew accuser Virginia Giuffre wrote a memoir. It’s coming out months after her death

Hillel Italie - August 25, 2025

1/2

New York: A posthumous and “unsparing” memoir by one of Jeffrey Epstein’s most prominent accusers, Virginia Roberts Giuffre, will be published on October 21, publishing house Alfred A. Knopf announced on Sunday (Monday AEST).

Giuffre, who died by suicide in April aged 41, had been working on Nobody’s Girl: A Memoir of Surviving Abuse and Fighting for Justice with American author-journalist Amy Wallace. She had completed the manuscript for the 400-page book, according to the publisher.

The publisher’s statement includes an email from Giuffre to Wallace a few weeks before her death, saying that it was her “heartfelt wish” the memoir be released “regardless” of her circumstances.

“The content of this book is crucial, as it aims to shed light on the systemic failures that allow the trafficking of vulnerable individuals across borders,” the email reads.

“It is imperative that the truth is understood and that the issues surrounding this topic are addressed, both for the sake of justice and awareness.”

Giuffre had been hospitalised following a serious accident on March 24, Knopf said, and sent the email on April 1. She died on April 25 in Western Australia.

“In the event of my passing, I would like to ensure that NOBODY’S GIRL is still released. I believe it has the potential to impact many lives and foster necessary discussions about these grave injustices,” she wrote to Wallace.

In 2023, the New York Post had reported that Giuffre had reached a deal “believed to be worth millions” with an undisclosed publisher. Knopf spokesperson Todd Doughty said she initially agreed to a seven-figure contract with Penguin Press, but moved with acquiring editor Emily Cunningham after Knopf hired Cunningham as executive editor last year.

Giuffre had often stated that, in the early 2000s, when she was a teenager, she was caught up in Epstein’s sex-trafficking ring and exploited by Britain’s Prince Andrew and other influential men. Epstein was found dead in a New York City jail cell in 2019 in what investigators described as a suicide. His former girlfriend, Ghislaine Maxwell, was convicted in late 2021 on sex-trafficking and other charges.

Andrew had denied Giuffre’s allegations. In 2022, Giuffre and Andrew reached an out-of-court settlement after she had sued him for sexual assault. A representative for Andrew did not immediately return a request for comment.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109583

File: ed58d0c0c5a3c90⋯.jpg (173.15 KB,852x376,213:94,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 4a7ac66d74092c2⋯.jpg (335.55 KB,825x674,825:674,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 53a9f784f5bd311⋯.jpg (322.52 KB,852x725,852:725,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23509019 (260139ZAUG25) Notable: Q Post #4923 - https://twitter.com/VRSVirginia/status/1319071346282778624 - Dearest Virginia - We stand with you. Now and always. Find peace through prayer. Never give up the good fight. God bless you. Q - https://qanon.pub/#4923 - https://qanon.pub/#4568

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109582

2/2

Nobody’s Girl is distinct from Giuffre’s unpublished memoir, The Billionaire’s Playboy Club, referenced in previous court filings and initially unsealed in 2019. Through Doughty, Wallace says she began working with Giuffre on a new memoir in 2021.

Giuffre’s name has continued to appear in headlines, even after her death. In July, United States President Donald Trump said that Epstein had “stolen” Giuffre from Mar-a-Lago, his private club in Florida where she once worked. She had alleged being approached by Maxwell and hired as a masseuse for Epstein. Maxwell has denied Giuffre’s allegations.

Doughty declined to provide details about the Epstein associates featured in Nobody’s Girl, but confirmed that Giuffre made “no allegations of abuse against Trump,” who continues to face questions about Epstein, the disgraced financier and his former friend.

Knopf’s statement says the book contains “intimate, disturbing and heartbreaking new details about her time with Epstein, Maxwell and their many well-known friends, including Prince Andrew, about whom she speaks publicly for the first time since their out-of-court settlement in 2022.” In a statement, Knopf publisher and editor-in-chief Jordan Pavlin called Nobody’s Girl a “raw and shocking” journey and “the story of a fierce spirit struggling to break free”.

Giuffre’s time with Epstein is well documented, although her accounts have been challenged. She had acknowledged getting details wrong, errors she attributed to trying to recall events from years ago. In 2022, she dropped allegations against Alan Dershowitz, saying in a statement at the time that she may “have made a mistake in identifying” the famed attorney as an abuser.

“Nobody’s Girl was both vigorously fact-checked and legally vetted,” a Knopf statement reads.

Wallace, Giuffre’s co-author on her memoir, is an award-winning magazine and newspaper reporter whose work has appeared in The New York Times and the Los Angeles Times, among other publications. She has also collaborated on two previous books, Pixar co-founder Ed Catmull’s Creativity, Inc. and former General Electric CEO Jeff Immelt’s Hot Seat.

If you or anyone you know needs support, you can contact the National Sexual Assault, Domestic and Family Violence Counselling Service at 1800RESPECT (1800 737 732), Lifeline (13 11 14), the Suicide Call Back Service (1300 659 467), Beyond Blue (1300 22 4636) and Kids Helpline (1800 55 1800).

https://www.1800respect.org.au/

https://www.lifeline.org.au/

https://www.suicidecallbackservice.org.au/

https://www.beyondblue.org.au/

https://www.kidshelpline.com.au/

https://www.theage.com.au/culture/books/epstein-prince-andrew-accuser-virginia-giuffre-wrote-a-memoir-it-s-coming-out-months-after-her-death-20250825-p5mpit.html

https://www.penguinrandomhouse.com/books/712958/nobodys-girl-by-virginia-roberts-giuffre/

Q Post #4923

Oct 21 2020 20:55:05 (EST)

https://twitter.com/VRSVirginia/status/1319071346282778624

Dearest Virginia -

We stand with you.

Now and always.

Find peace through prayer.

Never give up the good fight.

God bless you.

Q

https://qanon.pub/#4923

https://qanon.pub/#4568

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109584

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23509774 (260838ZAUG25) Notable: ‘Extraordinary and dangerous acts’:Iran blamed for two antisemitic attacks on Australian soil– (Video) Australia has expelled Iran’s ambassador and shuttered its embassy in Tehran after ASIO confirmed Tehran directed arson attacks on Sydney’s Lewis’ Continental Kitchen and Melbourne’s Adass Israel Synagogue. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese, flanked by ASIO chief Mike Burgess, Foreign Minister Penny Wong and Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke, condemned the “extraordinary and dangerous acts of aggression orchestrated by a foreign nation on Australian soil.” The government will now list Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps as a terrorist organisation. Israel and Jewish groups praised the move, warning Iran’s “malign reach extends into western democracies, including here in Australia.”

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>73674 (pb)

>>>/qresearch/23224374 (pb)

>>109251

‘Extraordinary and dangerous acts’: Iran blamed for two antisemitic attacks on Australian soil

In response, Iran’s ambassador to Australia has been expelled and the Australian embassy in Tehran shut down.

Matthew Knott and Paul Sakkal - August 26, 2025

1/2

Iran’s ambassador to Australia has been expelled and the Australian embassy in Tehran shuttered after the stunning revelation that Iran directed at least two high-profile attacks on the Australian Jewish community.

The most dangerous example of foreign interference in modern Australian history also prompted the Albanese government to designate Iran’s powerful Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps as a terrorist organisation, a move applauded by local Jewish groups.

The nation’s top spy agency believes that Iran was responsible for plotting arson attacks against Lewis’ Continental Kitchen in Sydney and the Adass Israel Synagogue in Melbourne last October and December, respectively.

The incidents, particularly the Melbourne synagogue attack, fuelled accusations that the government had been soft on antisemitism and helped damage diplomatic relations between Australia and Israel.

“It is likely Iran directed further attacks as well. These were extraordinary and dangerous acts of aggression orchestrated by a foreign nation on Australian soil,” Albanese said at a press conference in Parliament House alongside ASIO boss Mike Burgess, Foreign Minister Penny Wong and Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke on Tuesday afternoon.

“They were attempts to undermine social cohesion and sow discord in our community. It is totally unacceptable. The Australian government is taking strong and decisive action in response.”

The synagogue and kitchen both suffered significant damage in the attacks, but there were no injuries.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu last year linked the Australian government’s “extreme anti-Israel position” and voting record at the United Nations to the firebombing of the synagogue in a social media post attacking the government.

This is the first time Australia has expelled an ambassador since World War II, reflecting the seriousness of the foreign interference plot.

Burgess said that Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps had used “a complex web of proxies” to hide its involvement in antisemitic attacks on Australian soil. He said he did not believe Iran was responsible for all antisemitic attacks in Australia, but they may be responsible for more than the two announced on Tuesday.

“We have investigated dozens of incidents,” Burgess said. “ASIO now assesses the Iranian government directed at least two and likely more attacks on Jewish interests in Australia.

“Our painstaking investigation uncovered and unpicked the links between the alleged crimes and the commanders in Iran’s Revolutionary Guard Corps, the IRGC.

“Iran and its proxies literally and figuratively lit the matches and fanned the flames. I want to assure all Australians that ASIO and our law enforcement partners take these matters extremely seriously.”

Burgess described Iran’s involvement in the incidents as a “layer cake of cutouts” between the IRGC and the alleged perpetrators. When asked if there was organised crime involvement in the attacks, Burgess said there was an “organised crime element offshore”.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109585

File: 8b6b007ed4e1a8c⋯.jpg (351.88 KB,2048x1536,4:3,Clipboard.jpg)

File: caaf39dd69c52fc⋯.jpg (81.08 KB,1024x768,4:3,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 1429b7a4174e998⋯.jpg (666.07 KB,2048x1536,4:3,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23509797 (260901ZAUG25) Notable: Iran ambassador expelled from Australia, Anthony Albanese accuses nation of directing antisemitic attacks – For the first time since WWII, Australia has expelled a foreign ambassador after ASIO concluded Iran directed arson attacks on Melbourne’s Adass Israel Synagogue and Sydney’s Lewis’ Continental Kitchen. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese, flanked by AFP chief Reece Kershaw, ASIO director Mike Burgess and Foreign Minister Penny Wong, said Iran’s “extraordinary and dangerous acts of aggression” sought to terrify Jewish Australians and divide society. Iranian ambassador Ahmad Sadeghi and three officials were given seven days to leave. Burgess said Iran’s Revolutionary Guard Corps used “a complex web of proxies,” including organised crime, to hide its role. Australia also suspended operations at its Tehran embassy.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109584

Iran ambassador expelled from Australia, Anthony Albanese accuses nation of directing antisemitic attacks

For the first time since WWII, a foreign ambassador has been expelled from Australia. The PM gave the diplomat 30 minutes warning before holding a bombshell conference.

Samantha Maiden - August 26, 2025

1/2

Australia’s spy agency ASIO has found that Iran was responsible for a string of anti-semitic attacks in Australia in a bombshell finding that has prompted the expulsion of Iran’s ambassador.

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese made the shock announcement today flanked by AFP chief Reece Kershaw, ASIO boss Mike Burgess and Foreign Minister Penny Wong.

The anti-semitic campaign linked to Iran includes the attack on the Adass Israel Synagogue in Melbourne that occurred on December 6, 2024, when two masked men set fire to the building.

The spy agency believes there are also links with the attacks on the Lewis’ Continental Kitchen in Bondi, Sydney, which was damaged in firebombings in October last year.

Iranian ambassador to Australia Ahmad Sadeghi was told just 30 minutes before the press conference that he - and three other officials - were being expelled from the country.

The group - declared “persona non grata” - have seven days to leave. It also marks the first time since World War II that Australia has expelled a foreign ambassador.

ASIO stressed the Iranian embassy and its diplomats were not involved in the attacks.

“ASIO has now gathered enough credible intelligence to reach a deeply disturbing conclusion that the Iranian government directed at least two of these attacks,’’ the Prime Minister said.

“Iran has sought to disguise its involvement, but ASIO assesses, it was behind the attacks on the Lewis Continental kitchen in Sydney on October 20 last year, and the Adas Israel Synagogue in Melbourne on December 6 last year.

“ASIO assesses it is likely Iran directed further attacks as well.

“It is totally unacceptable, and the Australian Government is taking strong and decisive action in response. A short time ago, we informed the Iranian Ambassador to Australia that he would be expelled. We have suspended operations at our embassy in Tehran.”

The government also advised all Australians to leave Iran if they can do so safely.

“These were extraordinary and dangerous acts of aggression orchestrated by a foreign nation on Australian soil,” Mr Albanese said.

”They have sought to harm and terrorise Jewish Australians and sow hatred and division in our community.”

Foreign Minister Penny Wong said that the conduct was completely unacceptable.

“They have tried to divide the Australian community, and they have done so with acts of aggression that not only sought to terrify Australians, but put Australia’s - Australian lives in danger,’’ Senator Wong said.

“There is no doubt that these extraordinary and dangerous acts of aggression orchestrated by a foreign nation on Australian soil have crossed a line.

“And that’s why we have declared Iran’s ambassador to Australia persona non grata, as well as three other Iranian officials and they’ll have seven days to leave the country.

“This is the first time in the postwar period that Australia has expelled an ambassador. Iran’s actions are completely unacceptable.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109586

File: 7d59605a13723b7⋯.jpg (1.39 MB,5263x3509,5263:3509,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 9e22ceca526ef50⋯.jpg (2.65 MB,5143x3429,5143:3429,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23509808 (260912ZAUG25) Notable: Shock tactics: Why Albanese had to send the Iranians packing"By booting out Sadeghi and three other Iranian officials, the federal government has skipped all the interim steps available to it and gone straight to the diplomatic equivalent of the nuclear option. This suggests two things. First, that ASIO boss Mike Burgess is absolutely certain of the intelligence to hand… Second, it underscores the fact that the government’s rhetoric about wanting to stamp out antisemitism and ensure social cohesion… is genuine. Today’s move was not weak… symbolically, the expulsion of Sadeghi is a big deal because of the message it sends to Iran, and other nations such as China and Russia… that they will be called out and publicly humiliated if caught." – James Massola, The Age

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109584

>>109585

Shock tactics: Why Albanese had to send the Iranians packing

James Massola - August 26, 2025

The expulsion of Iran’s ambassador to Australia, Ahmad Sadeghi, marks a shocking new low in diplomatic relations with the Islamic Republic of Iran.

It also highlights just how serious the crisis of antisemitism has become in Australia, after Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and spy chief Mike Burgess revealed that Iran was involved in directing two antisemitic attacks in Australia, at the Adass Synagogue in Melbourne and the Lewis’ Continental Kitchen in Sydney.

Diplomatic expulsions of any sort are extraordinarily rare.

In the cautious world of diplomacy, there are usually multiple steps that are taken before expulsion including carefully worded protests, diplomatic démarches (essentially an ambassador getting a dressing down from a foreign minister) and even dispatching an ambassador to their home country for a spell to signal discontent.

A 2022 Parliamentary Library research paper highlights just how rare expulsions are. Since 1983, a handful of Russian, Iraqi and Syrian lower-ranking diplomats have been expelled on the grounds they were suspecting of spying, while one South African and one Israeli were also sent packing.

But as Albanese made clear, “this is the first time in the postwar period that Australia has expelled an ambassador”.

By booting out Sadeghi and three other Iranian officials, the federal government has skipped all the interim steps available to it and gone straight to the diplomatic equivalent of the nuclear option.

This suggests two things.

First, that ASIO boss Mike Burgess is absolutely certain of the intelligence to hand which showed Iran used third parties both in and outside Australia, with some links to criminal organisations, to direct and put into effect two of the most serious antisemitic attacks in Australia in years. Burgess also said that investigations are ongoing and that Iran may have had a role in other attacks.

Second, it underscores the fact that the government’s rhetoric about wanting to stamp out antisemitism and ensure social cohesion – despite the criticism it has faced from sections of the Jewish community, the federal opposition, and the Israeli government – is genuine.

Government concerns about foreign interference in Australia’s domestic politics and civil society have been growing for close to a decade, and former prime minister Malcolm Turnbull introduced tougher laws that sought to tackle head on foreign powers interfering in Australian society.

Burgess warned in his 2022 “threat assessment” speech that “espionage and foreign interference has supplanted terrorism as our principal security concern”, while in his 2023 speech he said a “hive of spies” from an unnamed foreign country (later revealed to be Russia) had been disrupted and deported.

But there is a big difference between deporting a low-ranking Russian apparatchik and expelling a nation’s chief diplomat.

This is also Albanese’s clearest signal of how serious his government is about tackling antisemitism at its source.

Australia’s Jewish community has been sounding the alarm about the rise of antisemitism in this country ever since the October 7, 2023 attacks.

It was only a week ago that Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu labelled Albanese “weak” and castigated him for abandoning Australia’s Jewish community, after Albanese announced Australia was joining like-minded allies and moving towards recognising a Palestinian state.

Today’s move was not weak.

Australia and Iran are neither allies nor major trading partners.

There is a small Iranian-born diaspora in Australia of about 85,000 people, though it’s likely that many of those Iranian-Australians are fierce opponents of the vicious theocracy that has ruled Iran since the 1979 revolution that deposed the Shah.

The practical effect on the Australian economy and the diplomatic relationship may not matter much.

But symbolically, the expulsion of Sadeghi is a big deal because of the message it sends to Iran, and other nations such as China and Russia engaged in foreign interference operations on Australian soil, that they will be called out and publicly humiliated if caught.

Australia might be on the other side of the world to the Middle East, but these Iranian influence operations are a reminder that we are on the frontlines when it comes to foreign interference.

And Iran isn’t even our number one competitor.

https://www.theage.com.au/politics/federal/shock-tactics-why-albanese-had-to-send-the-iranians-packing-20250826-p5mpz1.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109587

File: cda3f4c729b20fa⋯.jpg (210.74 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 5f0e135e38a5a64⋯.jpg (180.88 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 699c40976df3f5b⋯.jpg (82.33 KB,1280x719,1280:719,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23509816 (260931ZAUG25) Notable: Labor is taking decisive action on Iran’s attacks, but the warnings were there for Anthony Albanese"The evil actions of Ali Khamenei’s Islamic Republic of Iran in orchestrating the firebombings of the Adass Israel Synagogue and Lewis’ Continental Kitchen is the tip of the iceberg… Anthony Albanese has taken decisive action… The Iranian-backed attacks on Australian soil, which drove waves of copycat plots and anti-Semitic incidents, is a dramatic escalation that widens the net outside of espionage, foreign interference and cyber attacks… Yet their past comments and actions are not easily forgotten by Jewish-Australians… Iran, which funds and supplies Islamic terror groups including Hezbollah and Hamas… has always been an enemy of Australia… The interconnectedness between enemy states, organised crime gangs and street thugs poses a clear and present danger for Australia’s security." — Geoff Chambers, The Australian

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109584

>>109585

Labor is taking decisive action on Iran’s attacks, but the warnings were there for Anthony Albanese

GEOFF CHAMBERS - 26 August 2025

The evil actions of Ali Khamenei’s Islamic Republic of Iran in orchestrating the firebombings of the Adass Israel Synagogue and Lewis’ Continental Kitchen is the tip of the iceberg.

After ASIO director-general Mike Burgess on Monday informed the government that Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps was directly involved in the synagogue arson in Melbourne and attack on a Jewish-run kosher restaurant in Bondi, Anthony Albanese has taken decisive action.

The Prime Minister and Burgess revealed the shocking revelations on Tuesday shortly after the government expelled Iranian ambassador Ahmad Sadeghi and three of Tehran’s top operatives in Canberra – the first expulsion of an ambassador since World War II.

In the wake of Hamas’s murderous attacks against innocent Israelis on October 7, 2023, ­Sadeghi publicly incited anti-­Israel hate but received only light reprimands from the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade over his anti-Semitic vomit.

The Iranian-backed attacks on Australian soil, which drove waves of copycat plots and anti-Semitic incidents, is a dramatic escalation that widens the net outside of espionage, foreign interference and cyber attacks.

The explosion in anti-Semitic incidents targeting Jewish-­Australians and the government’s immediate response to the synagogue terror attack heaped pressure on Albanese, who often struggled to manage the crisis as Labor ministers elevated the scourge of Islamophobia.

The Albanese government has been told not all anti-Semitic attacks in Australia are linked to the IRGC. While investigations are ongoing in some cases, Iranian-backed attacks should not diminish dozens of other anti-Semitic incidents across the country.

Extreme elements in the pro-Palestinian movement are fuelling a new wave of anti-Semitism, which concerns some senior government figures.

Albanese, Tony Burke and Penny Wong – who have been locked in a war of words with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu over the government’s decision to formally recognise Palestine as a state – on Tuesday were careful to keep the focus on anti-Semitism and supporting the ­Jewish-Australian community.

Yet their past comments and actions are not easily forgotten by Jewish-Australians.

When Israel in June launched targeted attacks against Iran ­focused on nuclear and military ­facilities, the Albanese government urged caution and called for de-escalation.

Iran, which funds and supplies Islamic terror groups including Hezbollah and Hamas, which call for the destruction of Israel, has always been an enemy of Australia.

Amid tensions between the Australian and Israeli governments, Executive Council of Australian Jewry president Daniel Aghion is right in saying “Israel’s enemies are Australia’s enemies” and that the “Iranian regime has demonstrated that anti-Semitism is a threat not only to the Jews, it is a threat to civilisation”.

Burgess and outgoing Australian Federal Police Commissioner Reece Kershaw have repeatedly warned of the rising threat posed by extremism, espionage and foreign interference.

The interconnectedness between enemy states, organised crime gangs and street thugs poses a clear and present danger for Australia’s security.

ASIO and AFP investigators have been connecting the dots, threading together a complex network of encrypted communi­cations, cryptocurrency and finan­cial transactions crisscrossing the globe. This involved cracking anonymising technology, including dedicated encrypted communication devices used to co-ordinate the Iranian-backed attacks.

Investigators focused on young criminals based in Australia who were actively recruited, radicalised online and encouraged to commit anti-Semitic attacks.

The forensic investigation, supported by Five Eyes security partners including the US and other intelligence agencies, was built around the need to gather hard evidence.

In his Hawke Lecture delivered on July 31, Burgess listed China, Russia and Iran as countries targeting Australian secrets but warned people that there were many other nation states seeking to undermine our security.

As China, Russia, Iran, North Korea and other countries forge closer security and intelligence ties in an increasingly fragmented world, the schism between Western democracies and autocracies is deepening at a frightening pace.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/how-asio-cracked-the-code-and-found-out-iran-was-plotting-attacks-on-australias-jewish-community/news-story/cf776ef2a199d2886de157dfd16c7f6d

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109588

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23509829 (260948ZAUG25) Notable: Video: Porepunkah shooting: Weapons stolen from fatally wounded officers, alleged offender a ‘sovereign citizen’ — Two Victoria Police officers have been shot dead and a third seriously wounded in Porepunkah, north-east Victoria, with alleged gunman Dezi Freeman, 56, identified as a self-proclaimed “sovereign citizen” who has previously denounced police as “scumbags” and “criminal filth.” Freeman, his wife Mali, and at least one family member remain on the run after police attended his property to execute a warrant over historical sex abuse allegations. Weapons were taken from the slain officers, prompting a large-scale search and lockdown of the town. Tributes have flowed from Prime Minister Anthony Albanese, Premier Jacinta Allan, and police leaders.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Porepunkah shooting: Weapons stolen from fatally wounded officers, alleged offender a ‘sovereign citizen’

Cameron Houston and Carla Jaeger - August 26, 2025

1/2

The alleged gunman who fatally shot two police officers in Porepunkah on Tuesday has been identified as Dezi Freeman, a 56-year-old conspiracy theorist who has repeatedly espoused hatred for police and authorities.

Freeman, a self-proclaimed “sovereign citizen”, remains on the run from police with his wife, Mali, and at least one other family member.

Freeman allegedly shot two officers dead and seriously wounded another after a shooting at a rural property in the small town of Porepunkah, about 300 kilometres north-east of Melbourne and seven kilometres from Bright.

Freeman made headlines in 2021 when he attempted to privately prosecute then-premier Daniel Andrews on treason and fraud charges.

Freeman was arrested outside the Myrtleford Court before the December 2021 hearing, where he described the officers as “scumbags” and “criminal filth” who were “obsessed with power”. On another occasion, in 2020, he called an officer who pulled him over for speeding a “terrorist” and “corrupt scum”.

In a statement issued late on Tuesday afternoon, Victoria Police said 10 police had attended the property on Rayner Track, which runs south off Mount Buffalo Road, shortly after 10.30am on Tuesday when the shooting occurred. A call for urgent help at the property was made at 10.55am. No other officers were physically injured, but they remain at the property along with members of the special operations group and critical incident response team.

Three police sources, not authorised to speak on behalf of the force, told this masthead that police had attended the property to execute a warrant over historical sex abuse allegations when Freeman allegedly shot the two officers dead in an ambush and wounded the other.

Police sources confirmed earlier on Tuesday that Freeman was living on a bus on the property and was now on the run with family members, including children and his wife, Mali.

However, at a press conference, Victoria Police chief commissioner Mike Bush could not confirm whether Freeman fled into the bush alone, nor did he confirm his identity as reported by this masthead.

“He was seen going into the bush alone. We don’t know exactly where his wife is at the moment or the children, and we have no information to suggest whether he is with or without them,” Bush said.

“We are still looking to locate his partner and two children, but he was not seen to head into the bush with them.”

Two weapons were stolen from the fatally wounded officers, this masthead has been told.

“The exact circumstances surrounding the incident are still being determined, and it remains an active and ongoing situation,” the Victoria Police statement said. “A significant search is actively under way to locate the man.”

Sovereign citizens are considered to be part of a radicalised fringe group which follows conspiracy theories and believes the government is illegitimate. Members of this fringe group are known for their deep distrust of, and contempt for, law enforcement.

To reflect his beliefs, Freeman had changed his name.

Bush confirmed the deaths and said the wounded officer was undergoing surgery.

“This is a terribly tragic event for the Victoria Police, the police family,” Bush said. “It’s also very important that we wrap ourselves around the friends, family and colleagues of these officers who so bravely gave their lives to support their communities.”

Police urged people in and around Porepunkah to remain indoors until further notice and asked people not to travel into the area.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109589

File: 88e70bb77b2bd6e⋯.jpg (501.24 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23514551 (270923ZAUG25) Notable: Second man faces court for Adass Israel firebombing, a day after Iran exposed as behind the attacks — A 20-year-old Meadow Heights man, Ali Younes, has faced Melbourne Magistrates Court charged with arson, conduct endangering life and theft of a motor vehicle over the firebombing of the $20m Adass Israel Synagogue in Ripponlea last December. Police allege Younes was one of three masked men who broke in and set the building alight while about 20 people were inside. He is also accused of stealing a blue Volkswagen Golf used in the attack and linked to other crimes. Co-accused Giovanni Laulu, 21, was charged last month. Neither man has entered a plea.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109447

>>109584

>>109585

Second man faces court for Adass Israel firebombing, a day after Iran exposed as behind the attacks

GEORGIE KIBEL - 27 August 2025

A second man has faced court over the alleged firebombing of the Adass Israel Synagogue, valued at about $20m, a day after it was revealed Iran was behind the attack.

Ali Younes, 20, appeared via video link from Metropolitan Remand Centre on Wednesday for a brief filing hearing.

The Meadow Heights man was charged by the Victorian Joint Counter Terrorism Team with arson, conduct endangering life and theft of a motor vehicle for his alleged involvement in the destruction of the Ripponlea place of worship in the early hours of December 6 last year.

Police will allege Mr Younes is one of three individuals who broke into the synagogue on Glen Eira Ave, and deliberately set it on fire.

Charge sheets released by the Magistrates Court allege that Mr Younes “did engage in conduct namely setting fire to the Adass Israel Synagogue … while persons were inside, that placed those persons in danger of death”.

About 20 people were reported to be inside the place of worship when it was set alight.

CCTV footage released this year showed masked men smashing their way into the property – estimated to be valued at about $20m – with one carrying a red jerry can. Flames then engulfed the building.

The charge sheets revealed Mr Younes was accused of stealing the blue Volkswagen Golf in which the three offenders arrived at the scene .

Police believe the vehicle was used as a “communal crime car” and has been connected to a string of unrelated incidents – including a firebombing at South Yarra’s Lux Nightclub.

Mr Younes wore a green prison-issued bomber style jacket, and was mostly expressionless throughout the hearing.

He did not apply for bail and his lawyer did not declare any custody management issues.

Last month, Mr Younes’s co-accused – 21-year-old Werribee man Giovanni Laulu – was charged with arson, recklessly endangering life and vehicle theft.

The offence of arson carries a maximum penalty of 15 years’ imprisonment, while theft of motor vehicle and conduct endangering life both carry a maximum penalty of 10 years’ imprisonment.

Neither man has yet been required to enter a plea. They will return to Melbourne Magistrates Court on December 4.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/second-man-faces-court-for-adass-israel-firebombing-a-day-after-iran-exposed-as-behind-the-attacks/news-story/dddfb8ac2e2ca5683f5f16ddd84a78fd

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109590

File: af579662027cef7⋯.mp4 (15.98 MB,960x540,16:9,Clipboard.mp4)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23514558 (270930ZAUG25) Notable: Australia 'primarily' responsible for investigation that uncovered Iran links to antisemitic attacks — Prime Minister Anthony Albanese confirmed ASIO was “primarily” responsible for uncovering Iran’s role in the firebombings of Melbourne’s Adass Israel Synagogue and Sydney’s Lewis’ Continental Kitchen. He said the investigation traced perpetrators “right through to the funding” and identified individuals both offshore and onshore. Iran’s foreign ministry condemned the expulsions of its ambassador Ahmad Sadeghi and three officials as an “assault on diplomacy,” linking them to domestic criticism of Israel. ASIO said Iran’s Revolutionary Guard Corps used “cut-outs” to direct the attacks. Operations at Australia’s Tehran embassy have been suspended, and the IRGC will be listed as a terrorist organisation.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109584

>>109585

Australia 'primarily' responsible for investigation that uncovered Iran links to antisemitic attacks

Maani Truu, Claudia Long, and Olivia Caisley - 26 August 2025

Iran has criticised Australia's move to cut diplomatic ties with the regime after an investigation found the country directed antisemitic attacks in Sydney and Melbourne, labelling it an "assault on diplomacy".

ASIO chief Mike Burgess on Tuesday accused Iran of ordering the attacks on Adass Israel Synagogue and Lewis Continental Kitchen in October and December, prompting the expulsion of Iran's ambassador to Australia from the country.

Responding publicly to the revelations for the first time, Iran's foreign ministry spokesperson, Esmaeil Baghaei, said the move appeared to be influenced by "domestic developments" in Australia, citing recent protests against the war in Gaza.

"It appears that this action against Iran, effectively an assault on diplomacy and the relationship between the two nations, is being used to offset the modest criticism Australia has recently directed at the Zionist regime," he said.

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese confirmed late on Tuesday that Australia was primarily responsible for the investigation that uncovered Iran's alleged links to the attack.

In an interview with the ABC, he dismissed a question about whether those findings were a result of a joint investigation with other countries.

"No, it was primarily ASIO's investigation, and ASIO came to this determination," he said.

"They have been able to trace the whole line-up, if you like, from the perpetrators who physically committed the crimes, the actions, right through to the funding of those criminal acts."

The ABC understands that partner intelligence was used in one case, but it did not confirm Iran's involvement, and that the majority of intelligence was Australian-based.

Mr Burgess said the investigation found Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps directed the attack through a series of "cut-outs" or third parties and that some perpetrators were paid.

Evidence uncovered during the investigation leading to certain individuals is "clear", the prime minister told ABC's 7.30, confirming that their identities are known.

"We certainly have the identity of people that were involved offshore, as well as onshore, the elements that were used to carry out these attacks," he said.

Mr Albanese did not say whether the individuals within the Revolutionary Guard identified by the investigation would be sanctioned, but added that the government would "take whatever action is appropriate".

The Iranian ambassador to Australia, Ahmad Sadeghi, and three other officials have already been expelled and given seven days to leave Australia.

ASIO confirmed no diplomats or embassy staff were involved in the attacks.

Meanwhile, operations at Australia's embassy in Tehran have been suspended, with all diplomats already out of the country.

Pending legislation, the government will also designate the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps as a terrorist organisation, a move that has been welcomed by the opposition.

Mr Burgess flagged that ASIO believed Iran may have also been behind other antisemitic attacks.

The spy agency and the Australian Federal Police will continue their investigations into Iran’s interference in Australia, the prime minister said, including the regime’s activities targeting Australian citizens.

"What we will continue to do is to work with the agencies. ASIO are very aware of the activities that have occurred, including two Australians of Iranian descent who've been harassed here."

"This is a very complex situation that they have worked through and they have kept the government and our appropriate committees informed at regular intervals about the work that's been taking place."

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-08-26/prime-minister-iran-links-antisemitic-attacks/105700422

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109591

File: eed319661467478⋯.mp4 (10.02 MB,960x540,16:9,Clipboard.mp4)

File: dc6948681aba31d⋯.jpg (216.88 KB,1000x562,500:281,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23514579 (270947ZAUG25) Notable: Video: Israeli government claims credit for pushing Albanese to expel Iranian diplomats — Israel has claimed Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s “forthright intervention” shamed Australia into expelling Iranian ambassador Ahmad Sadeghi after ASIO linked Tehran to antisemitic attacks in Sydney and Melbourne. Israeli spokesman David Mencer said Australia was now “taking the threats seriously,” while Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke dismissed the claim as “complete nonsense,” insisting the decision was based solely on ASIO’s findings. Iran’s foreign minister Seyed Abbas Araghchi echoed Netanyahu’s insult, branding Anthony Albanese a “weak politician,” while Tehran rejected responsibility and threatened reciprocal action, accusing Canberra of appeasing Israel and ignoring “genocide” in Gaza.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109584

>>109585

Israeli government claims credit for pushing Albanese to expel Iranian diplomats

Matthew Doran - 27 August 2025

1/2

The Israeli government is claiming credit for Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and intelligence agencies publicising Iranian involvement in antisemitic attacks on Australian soil, as well as kicking Tehran's envoy out of Canberra.

On Tuesday, Mr Albanese and ASIO director-general Mike Burgess accused Iran of directing at least two attacks in Sydney and Melbourne.

In protest, the government announced it would expel Iran's ambassador to Australia, Ahmad Sadeghi, and three other diplomats.

Australia's diplomatic mission in Tehran has been suspended, and officials have already left the country.

The Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) will also be labelled a terrorist organisation under Australian law.

Mr Albanese was personally called out again for the move, with Iran echoing Benjamin Netanyahu's criticisms from last week.

Officials in Israel had refused to comment for hours after the announcement, pointing only to a statement from the Israeli embassy in Canberra welcoming the move.

But in a press briefing overnight, Israeli government spokesperson David Mencer effectively accused Australia of being shamed into acting.

"Prime Minister [Benjamin] Netanyahu has made a very forthright intervention when it comes to Australia, a country in which we have a long history of friendly relations," Mr Mencer said in response to a question from the ABC.

"He made those comments because he did not believe that the actions of the Australian government had gone anywhere near far enough to address the issues of antisemitism. He made very forthright comments about the prime minister himself.

"We certainly see it from Israel that Australia taking the threats against Israel and the Jewish people, Jewish Australians living in Australia — for the Australian government to take those threats seriously is a positive outcome."

Australia's Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke said it was "complete nonsense" for Israel to claim credit.

"There was not a minute between us receiving this assessment [from ASIO] and us starting to work through what we would do as a response," Mr Burke told ABC Radio National.

"We've taken this action because Iran has attacked Australians. No other country is involved in terms of that conclusion."

Last week, a diplomatic furore erupted as Mr Netanyahu labelled Mr Albanese a "weak" leader who had "betrayed Israel and abandoned Australia's Jews".

The day before, Israel announced it would tear up the visas of Australian diplomats working in the West Bank in protest against the Albanese government's moves to recognise a Palestinian state and block controversial Israel figures wanting to travel to Israel.

"Jewish Australians felt threatened," Mr Mencer said.

"The relationship between this country and Australia was damaged, and so it's welcome that after the Prime Minister Netanyahu's timely intervention that these actions have been taken by Australia's government."

Mr Mencer added that it was up to Australia to decide how to respond to the threat of foreign interference from Iran.

"The government of Iran are a wholly negative influence on world affairs — they desire, they openly say, they wish to wipe this country [Israel] off the face of the earth," he said.

"They have around the world, in London, and now it seems in Australia as well, are actively seeking to attack Jewish communities and other Israeli interests or targets in Israel."

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109592

File: 9e02236087a3378⋯.jpg (117.41 KB,1280x720,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 51f241a48083a28⋯.jpg (153.83 KB,1279x720,1279:720,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 9ee1bd5fc1c0413⋯.jpg (148.21 KB,1575x886,1575:886,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23514611 (271010ZAUG25) Notable: Loud bangs heard, as police reveal identities of cops allegedly killed by fugitive Dezi Freeman — Victoria Police has named Detective Leading Senior Constable Neal Thompson, 59, and Senior Constable Vadim De Waart, 35, as the officers killed in Tuesday’s Porepunkah ambush. Chief Commissioner Mike Bush said the loss “has struck at the heart of Victoria Police,” describing both men as heroes. Thompson was a 38-year veteran nearing retirement; De Waart, a linguist and traveller, joined in 2018. As colleagues and leaders offered tributes, the hunt for alleged gunman Dezi Freeman intensified with roadblocks, a no-fly zone, and Special Operations Group units searching bushland where Freeman, armed and skilled in survival, remains at large.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109588

Loud bangs heard, as police reveal identities of cops allegedly killed by fugitive Dezi Freeman

As bad weather closes in, those pursuing alleged double cop killer Dezi Freeman know it could take days before police are able to flush out a man with nothing to lose. Now they have named his alleged victims.

JOHN FERGUSON - 27 August 2025

1/2

The identities of the two slain police victims of the Porepunkah ambush have been revealed by the force on Wednesday.

Killed were Detective Leading Senior Constable Neal Thompson, 59, a 38-year veteran of Victoria Police, and Senior Constable Vadim De Waart, 35, who joined the force in 2018.

Both men have been hailed as heroes by their colleagues after being allegedly gunned down by Dezi Freeman in a firefight on Tuesday morning that also seriously injured a third officer.

Chief Commissioner Mike Bush said: “This devastating loss of Neal and Vadim has struck at the heart of Victoria Police, the broader policing family and the community of Porepunkah.

“In the coming days, weeks and months, we will all grieve this loss and deeply miss our colleagues and friends who have paid the ultimate sacrifice in the line of duty.

“It is not lost on me that our members take a risk every time they go to work to protect the Victorian community. While we all live with the knowledge that the worst could happen on a shift, we don’t expect it to.

“In these difficult times it is so important that our people stand together and support each other, and I have full confidence that we will all do this with dignity and respect.”

Police said Mr Thompson joined in September 1987 and spent seven years in general duties at Collingwood police station.

Mr Thompson then worked as a detective at the Major Fraud Squad and the State Crime Squad, before moving to Wangaratta CIU in July 2007.

“Neal was an adventurer and enjoyed all things outdoors. He loved getting out in nature, and his friends and colleagues regularly joined him on these trips,’’ police said.

“Neal had spent the past six years alongside his partner, Lisa, the love of his life. Since the pair met, Neal had found new purpose and was planning in earnest for his imminent retirement.

“Together with Lisa, Neal had built a new home and had a long list of tasks planned after he knocked off work for the last time.’’

Mr De Waart started his career at the Victoria Police Academy in December 2018.

“Following his training, Vadim joined St Kilda police station where he worked for three years, before joining PORT as a senior constable in April 2023. At the time of his passing, Vadim was on temporary assignment in Wangaratta,’’ police said.

“An eternal optimist and avid traveller, Vadim was fluent in French, Spanish, Flemish and English. He had also completed scuba dives all around the world and motorcycling trips more locally with his friends and colleagues.

“He was a keen gin collector and always picked up a local bottle on his overseas adventures for his large collection at home. While travelling was his passion, Vadim was extremely proud to have purchased his first home in Melbourne in recent years.

“Vadim is survived by his beloved parents Carolina and Alain, who live in his native Belgium, and his younger brother Sacha, who lives in Switzerland. Closer to home in Melbourne, he leaves behind his aunty Jacqueline, uncle Shane, uncle Peter, aunty Maria and his cousins Christopher, Jeremy, Laura and Tessa.’’

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109593

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23514628 (271019ZAUG25) Notable: Video: Marles gets last-minute meeting with Hegseth — Richard Marles has secured a late meeting in Washington with US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth and Vice President JD Vance, though a scheduled press conference was cancelled. The Deputy Prime Minister and Defence Minister also met White House Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller and was expected to see Secretary of State Marco Rubio. Marles shared photos with Hegseth and Vance, saying the alliance was “longstanding” and that he reaffirmed Australia’s commitment. The visit comes as the Pentagon reviews AUKUS, with Hegseth urging Canberra to lift defence spending to 3.5% of GDP — a request not yet met by the Albanese government.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109299

>>109316

>>109512

>>109545

Marles gets last-minute meeting with Hegseth

Richard Marles also met with JD Vance on his trip to Washington but we don’t know what they talked about as a planned press conference was cancelled.

JOE KELLY - August 27, 2025

Richard Marles has managed to secure a last-minute meeting with US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth, along with US Vice President JD Vance on his trip to Washington – although a planned press conference has been cancelled.

The Australian Deputy Prime Minister is also expected to meet with US Secretary of State Marco Rubio later on Tuesday local time after holding further discussions with defence industry companies during the day including Boeing.

The Australian first revealed that Mr Marles, who also serves as Australia’s Defence Minister, had not locked in a meeting with Mr Hegseth on Monday night local time – despite publicly saying on the weekend that this was the reason for his trip to Washington.

The Australian understands that Mr Marles also met with White House Deputy Chief of Staff, Stephen Miller, on Tuesday morning local time.

It is not yet clear how long or comprehensive the meeting with Mr Vance and Mr Hegseth was, or what issues the trio discussed.

However, taking to social media, Mr Marles posted photos of himself standing alongside both Mr Vance and Mr Hegseth.

He said: “The Alliance between Australia and the United States is longstanding, built on our shared history of deep collaboration.”

“I was pleased to have the opportunity to reaffirm Australia’s commitment to building on this partnership with US @VP JD Vance and Secretary of Defense @PeteHegseth in Washington D.C. today,” he added.

A press conference planned with Mr Marles before his departure back to Australia at 7pm local time has been cancelled.

The trip from Mr Marles comes amid a Pentagon review into the landmark AUKUS partnership under which Washington is scheduled to provide Canberra with at least three Virginia class submarines from the early 2030s.

Mr Hegseth has previously asked Mr Marles for Australia to increase its defence budget to 3.5 per cent of GDP – a request that has not been accepted by the Albanese government.

Anthony Albanese has yet to meet with Donald Trump and there is speculation about whether he will have a chance when he travels to America next month to address the UN General Assembly.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/marles-gets-last-minute-meeting-with-hegseth/news-story/71422050312af703f993609c10742c7d

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bv_vcNmBzlQ

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109594

File: 533d9f6b4c008a7⋯.jpg (303.21 KB,750x806,375:403,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 35f99eab44eaf0a⋯.jpg (201.8 KB,2048x1264,128:79,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 2f78a0b04b5788b⋯.jpg (363.09 KB,2048x1530,1024:765,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 9e93e036a5c98f3⋯.jpg (239.73 KB,2048x1302,1024:651,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23514638 (271026ZAUG25) Notable: Allies bowing to defence demands, Hegseth boasts after Marles meeting — US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth declared Indo-Pacific allies were “stepping up” on military spending just hours after his talks with Richard Marles in Washington on the AUKUS submarine pact. Marles also pitched Australia as a “reliable” supplier of critical minerals while seeking relief from Donald Trump’s tariffs, and met with Vice President JD Vance, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, and Trump aide Stephen Miller. Hegseth wants Australia to lift defence spending from 2% to 3.5% of GDP, but Labor has so far resisted, leaving the Pentagon review of AUKUS under Elbridge Colby unresolved.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109299

>>109316

>>109545

>>109593

Allies bowing to defence demands, Hegseth boasts after Marles meeting

Jessica Gardner and Andrew Tillett - Aug 27, 2025

Washington/Canberra | US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth has boasted that allies in the Indo-Pacific have heeded Donald Trump’s demands to lift military spending, just hours after talks with Richard Marles on the AUKUS nuclear-powered submarine deal.

The defence minister also pushed Australia’s case as a reliable and plentiful supplier of critical minerals for new technologies – an offer Labor has put repeatedly as it seeks relief for exporters from Donald Trump’s tariffs – in face-to-face talks with high-ranking US officials.

Marles made a sudden dash to Washington this week, skipping parliament, amid growing concerns over differences between Canberra and Washington on trade and defence spending and the outcome of a Pentagon review into the AUKUS submarine pact.

While the purpose of the trip was to meet Hegseth, it took several days for Marles to lock in a time with the colourful defence secretary.

Marles shared photographs of his encounter with Hegseth and Vice President J.D. Vance on Tuesday (Wednesday AEST) in Washington, highlighting that a diplomatic blunder was avoided but providing little detail about the engagement.

Marles said in a post on social media platform X that he was able “to reaffirm” Australia’s commitment to its longstanding alliance with the US to Vance and Hegseth.

As well as the meeting with Vance, Marles met Trump’s deputy chief of staff, Stephen Miller, who is regarded as one of the president’s most loyal and influential aides, and Secretary of State Marco Rubio. Rubio is also filling in as Trump’s national security adviser, giving him Trump’s ear.

Marles’ meeting with such high-ranking figures could pave the way for Prime Minister Anthony Albanese to have his first face-to-face meeting with Trump sooner rather than later. The date of that long-awaited meeting remains up in the air.

Hegseth has pushed for Australia to lift defence spending to 3.5 per cent of gross domestic product, up from 2 per cent, which put some strain on the relationship, amid a broader push that American allies boost their military budgets.

After the Albanese government rebuffed the request, it was revealed that Hegseth’s Pentagon policy chief, Elbridge Colby, was conducting a review of the AUKUS nuclear-submarine pact.

Following his meeting with Marles, much of Hegseth’s day on Tuesday was taken up by a live-streamed cabinet meeting in the White House, which went for more than three hours.

Hegseth sat to the left of Trump, who encouraged each of his cabinet secretaries to speak about their successes in the first eight months of his second term, especially any initiatives that were “bringing jobs back to America”.

“Whether it’s Europe ... our allies [will be] paying 5 per cent now. Our allies in the Indo-Pacific [are] stepping up to do the same,” Hegseth said.

“That’s a recognition that American leadership is here.”

Labor is already increasing defence spending, albeit not at the rate the US is demanding, but Marles has left the door open to a further rise next year when Defence updates its integrated investment program – the 10-year blueprint for new weapons.

During Marles’ meetings, the ministers and the Americans discussed deepening the military alliance between Australia and the US, including through AUKUS and US deployment of forces to Australian military bases.

Marles reiterated the importance of defence co-operation to the Indo-Pacific amid a time of strategic competition in our region with China.

Marles also highlighted Australia’s potential as one of the largest resources deposits to meet increasing global and domestic demand for critical minerals and rare earths needed for energy, technology and defence. He also emphasised the importance of two-way investment.

“Australia’s defence relationship with the United States continues to grow and deepen,” Marles said.

https://www.afr.com/policy/foreign-affairs/allies-bowing-to-defence-demands-hegseth-boasts-after-marles-meeting-20250827-p5mq3v

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109595

File: 8c6c497945c6902⋯.jpg (207.92 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 847209191c34974⋯.jpg (300.17 KB,2047x1152,2047:1152,Clipboard.jpg)

File: c0ff73cd6135232⋯.jpg (172.75 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23514649 (271031ZAUG25) Notable: Marles’ mystery visit to US raises more questions than answers amid mix-ups"Richard Marles was on a mission for Australia this week in Washington DC, but his purpose and whether he succeeded are mysteries. His meetings with the Trump administration have raised more questions than answers… The Defence Minister’s main public reason for rushing to Washington was to meet Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth… As revealed by The Australian, Marles touched down in Washington to find that no meeting with Hegseth had been locked in. In the end, Marles did see the Defence Secretary - although it appears they spoke only briefly. A readout from the Australian side revealed that Marles discussed critical minerals and rare earths, investment opportunities, US-Australia defence ties including AUKUS, US force-posture initiatives and growing ties between both nations’ defence industrial bases as well as the need for deeper defence industry engagement. Yet, his overall agenda with the administration remains opaque - including whether he may have laid the groundwork for a face-to-face meeting between the President and the Prime Minister. On these issues, it may better serve the government’s political interests to embrace ambiguity rather than clarity." — Joe Kelly, The Australian

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109299

>>109316

>>109545

>>109593

Marles’ mystery visit to US raises more questions than answers amid mix-ups

JOE KELLY - 27 August 2025

Richard Marles was on a mission for Australia this week in Washington DC, but his purpose and whether he succeeded are mysteries.

His meetings with the Trump administration have raised more questions than answers and the evidence suggests the visit did not go according to script.

The Deputy Prime Minister left the US on Tuesday, local time, after cancelling a news conference and without answering a single question from the media.

His key engagements appeared to have been secured at the last minute – lending the entire trip an improvised atmospheric. Yet, on the surface, it must be seen as a success.

Marles obtained in-person meetings with Vice-President JD Vance and Secretary of State Marco Rubio at the White House – two of the most powerful people in the Trump administration.

He also met White House deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller.

This should be seen as a clear symbol of the strong relationship between Canberra and Washington and the high-level access afforded to Australian ministers – a good news story for the Albanese government.

Except this isn’t why Marles said he was travelling to America.

The Defence Minister’s main public reason for rushing to Washington was to meet Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth.

This was crucial given Australia is under immense pressure from the US after rebuffing a request – by Hegseth – to increase defence spending to 3.5 per cent of GDP.

A major review being conducted by the Pentagon into the landmark AUKUS agreement also threatens plans for Washington to sell Australia Virginia-class submarines from the early 2030s.

The situation has been made more uncertain given Anthony Albanese’s failure to meet Donald Trump and the growing rift with Washington on key policy matters – including recognition of a Palestinian state.

Marles may have been on a simple mission to assure the US that it could still rely on Australia as an ally and partner. But there was a major problem.

As revealed by The Australian, Marles touched down in Washington to find that no meeting with Hegseth had been locked in. This sparked a diplomatic scramble on Monday, local time, and a short time later news emerged of meetings the next day with Vance, Rubio and Miller. The source of the mix-up with Hegseth and whether it was reflective of a deeper problem in the alliance relationship is unclear but unlikely.

Australian officials believe it was the result of a scheduling clash on the US side.

In the end, Marles did see the Defence Secretary – although it appears they spoke only briefly.

While Marles issued a statement saying that he met Vance and Rubio to “reaffirm our commitment to the alliance and advance our strong partnership”, his engagement with Hegseth was given a more cosmetic description.

“It was fantastic to see Secretary Hegseth again, following our most recent meeting at the Shangri-La Dialogue in May,” Marles said.

He posted photos on social media of himself standing alongside both Vance and Hegseth, declaring the alliance was “built on our shared history of deep collaboration”.

A readout from the Australian side revealed that Marles discussed critical minerals and rare earths, investment opportunities, US-Australia defence ties including AUKUS, US force-posture initiatives and growing ties between both nations’ defence industrial bases as well as the need for deeper defence industry engagement. Yet, his overall agenda with the administration remains opaque – including whether he may have laid the groundwork for a face-to-face meeting between the President and the Prime Minister.

There is also no illumination on whether assurances were provided by the US on the future of AUKUS or if a further request was made for the Albanese government to increase the defence budget.

On these issues, it may better serve the government’s political interests to embrace ambiguity rather than clarity.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/world/marles-mystery-visit-to-us-raises-more-questions-than-answers-amid-mixups/news-story/5299a98ab687d6db56ce879e78f75eef

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109596

File: f42627358f663c8⋯.jpg (320.54 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 31413b88d16fbc3⋯.jpg (424.94 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: e9e6b461c6439a0⋯.jpg (3.17 MB,1878x3101,1878:3101,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23514674 (271041ZAUG25) Notable: Beijing to Canberra: ‘Say no to AUKUS’ — Beijing has used the rift between the Albanese government and the Trump administration over defence spending to renew pressure on Australia to abandon AUKUS. In a China Daily editorial, Beijing said Canberra should “exercise strategic autonomy” and “say no to AUKUS,” calling the pact a Cold War project serving only to heighten tensions. The piece cited Paul Keating’s view that Washington might “save Australia from itself.” The warning came as Defence Minister Richard Marles met US counterparts in Washington, and ahead of a major PLA parade showcasing new hypersonic and strategic missile systems.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109299

>>109316

>>109392

>>109430

Beijing to Canberra: ‘Say no to AUKUS’

WILL GLASGOW - 27 August 2025

Beijing has seized on the rift between the Albanese government and the Trump administration over defence spending to argue that Australia should follow Paul Keating’s counsel and “say no to AUKUS”.

Xi Jinping’s government delivered the message in the lead editorial on Wednesday in the state-owned China Daily, Beijing’s most authoritative English language masthead.

“As the Pentagon is now reviewing the AUKUS security pact between the United States, the United Kingdom and Australia, Canberra needs to decide whether it is still ready to push ahead with this US-led project that goes against its own national interests in many aspects,” the China Daily editorialised.

“The purported aim is to counter what the US and its allies perceive to be a ‘China threat’ in the Asia-Pacific through enhanced trilateral security and defence collaboration,” continued the state-owned masthead, which is overseen by Beijing’s Propaganda Ministry.

“China has firmly opposed the plan since it was announced, saying it is driven by a Cold War mentality and serves only to increase tensions in the region,” the China Daily wrote.

“Now, with the current US administration’s review of AUKUS being conducted to make sure it meets the ‘America First’ agenda, the possibility has emerged that the project might be put on hold or even dropped.”

Beijing has opposed the AUKUS pact ever since it was announced in September 2021. The defence sharing agreement was conceived by then Prime Minister Scott Morrison and became a centrepiece of the Biden administration’s attempt to work with allies to create collective deterrence against future military aggression by China.

The AUKUS pact is currently under review by Pentagon policy chief Elbridge Colby, leading some of its longstanding critics to argue that it may be shelved.

Amid the review, Defence Minister Richard Marles this week visited Washington for meetings with US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth, US Vice President JD Vance and White House Deputy Chief of Staff, Stephen Miller.

Mr Marles cancelled a planned press conference in Washington amid ongoing speculation about when Prime Minister Anthony Albanese will meet with US President Donald Trump. Eight months after the American president’s inauguration, the two leaders have still not met in person.

The Wednesday editorial continues Beijing’s four year effort to talk Canberra out of the AUKUS pact, which the China Daily characterised as a “lopsided arrangement where the US calls the shots with the unilateral right to cancel any aspect of the deal”.

“This has prompted former Australian prime minister Paul Keating to express the hope the ongoing review ‘might very well be the moment Washington saves Australia from itself’.”

Beijing’s excitement about fissures in the US-Australian defence partnership comes as the People’s Liberation Army prepares for a huge display of its increasingly potent military power.

Next week, President Xi will be joined by Russia’s President Vladimir Putin and other world leaders for a military parade in central Beijing to mark the 80th anniversary of what it calls the victory in the “Chinese people’s war of resistance against Japanese aggression and the world anti-fascist war”.

A PLA major general last week said the parade will include the debut of hypersonic, antimissile defence and strategic missiles “to exhibit our strong strategic deterrence capabilities”.

China has undertaken a huge military build up over the past three decades as its economy has grown into the world’s second biggest.

That build up, along with the PLA’s increasingly assertive behaviour in the region, has concerned capitals around the region, including Canberra.

Beijing dismisses those concerns, including in its barbs against the China-focused AUKUS agreement.

“Under the plan, Australia will spend huge amounts of money on a navy transformation based on the false belief that China, its largest trading partner and export market for the past 16 years, ‘threatens’ the country’s security,” the China Daily wrote in its Wednesday editorial.

“The assumption, which has no historical or contemporary proof to support it, will only jeopardise the mutually beneficial partnership between the two countries.

“Canberra should come to terms with reality and exercise strategic autonomy in handling China-related issues … It should say no to AUKUS.”

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/defence/beijing-to-canberra-say-no-to-aukus/news-story/ba039e2b63252689fb150f4fd5638642

https://www.chinadailyasia.com/hk/article/618702

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109597

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23518712 (280925ZAUG25) Notable: Video: Iranian ambassador conducts dramatic press conference before leaving Australia — Expelled Iranian ambassador Ahmad Sadeghi held a tense press conference in Sydney before departing Australia, denying Tehran’s role in antisemitic arson attacks despite ASIO’s findings. Flanked by men berating journalists as “stenographers” and a “disgrace,” Sadeghi dismissed the allegations as a “conspiracy” and a “misunderstanding” in relations. He insisted Iran was peaceful and claimed that Iran has a large Jewish community to counter criticism that Iran has long sponsored antisemitic attacks via proxy forces abroad. His departure comes after ASIO concluded Iran’s Revolutionary Guard Corps directed at least two attacks, prompting Canberra to expel Sadeghi, shut its Tehran embassy, and warn Australians against travel.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109584

>>109585

>>109593

>>109595

Iranian ambassador conducts dramatic press conference before leaving Australia

Nick Bonyhady - August 28, 2025

Men accompanying Iranian ambassador Ahmad Sadeghi have been filmed berating journalists attempting to interview the envoy as he departed Sydney on Thursday evening after being ordered out of the country.

Australian intelligence services revealed on Tuesday that they had concluded that the Iranian regime’s state militia had funded and directed at least two antisemitic attacks on Australian soil, prompting the Albanese government to expel Sadeghi.

The outgoing ambassador denied Iran had any involvement in the arson attacks that gutted Lewis’ Continental Kitchen in Bondi and the Adass Israel Synagogue in Melbourne in late 2024 and said the theocratic state was peaceful. Sadeghi said, without evidence, that the agencies’ conclusions could have come from a “conspiracy against our friendly relations with Australia.”

Before Sadeghi spoke to reporters, men accompanying him raised their voices at journalists attempting to interview the envoy and accused them of uncritically accepting the work of Australia’s intelligence services.

“You’re a pack of stenographers. That’s all you are, and it’s a disgrace. Is that really what you study? Is that really the pinnacle of your career,” one of the men said. “What a disgrace. What a disgrace.”

Sadeghi went to check in shortly after being interviewed. There are no direct flights from Australia to Iran, but there are connections via Gulf states and Turkey. The ambassador leaving the nation comes just over 48 hours after the revelations of foreign interference by Iran were made public.

The ambassador was on Tuesday called in to the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade headquarters in Canberra, and told he had just days to leave the country.

The meeting took place just before Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and Australia’s intelligence services told the nation that Iran was being accused of being involved in antisemitic attacks on Australian soil. They made clear that Sadeghi and his embassy staff were not involved in the incidents.

He was then photographed at Iran’s Canberra embassy on Wednesday, and staff during the same day were seen at both the embassy and the ambassador’s residence with moving boxes.

He said his expulsion has come about as a result of a “misunderstanding” in the relationship between Australia and Iran. The outgoing ambassador claimed that Iran has a large Jewish community to counter criticism that Iran has long sponsored antisemitic attacks via proxy forces abroad.

“I’m telling you they’re ordinary, just they have the synagogues,” Sadeghi said. “I can just send, you know, the videos of how they practice.”

In recent years, ASIO Director-General Mike Burgess has warned that Iran, alongside China and Russia, was among the most pernicious practitioners of foreign interference in Australia.

Iran, and the nation’s powerful armed forces group the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, have been accused of acts of terror and other crimes in Western democracies, including, among others, the US, Spain and France. The revolutionary guard will be listed as a terror group after Tuesday’s revelations.

Burgess said on Tuesday that security agencies had investigated dozens of incidents of antisemitism in Australia. “ASIO now assesses the Iranian government directed at least two and likely more attacks on Jewish interests in Australia,” he said.

Australia has also shuttered its embassy in the Iranian capital, Tehran. Eight Australians, six embassy staff and two dependents, were moved to a third country for their own safety on Monday.

It’s estimated that between 3000 and 4000 Australians, or dual citizens, live in Iran. The Australian government has advised Australians not to travel to Iran and warned they could be subject to arbitrary detention.

As he left, Sadeghi admitted his final days in the country had been challenging but kept a brave face. Australians, he said, were “very nice people”.

https://www.theage.com.au/politics/federal/iranian-ambassador-conducts-dramatic-press-conference-before-leaving-australia-20250828-p5mqqj.html

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2NNxvZb4SaA

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.109598

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23524952 (292027ZAUG25) Notable: Tony Burke’s ‘nothing could be less Australian’ slur on immigration march protesters exposes Canberra elite's preference for every flag except their own - "The March for Australia rallies are barely 24 hours away, and it appears Tony Burke has acquired a sudden craving for patriotism. According to the Home Affairs Minister, “nothing could be less Australian” than the planned demonstrations. Unfortunately, the flag to which the majority of the ruling class swears allegiance seems pretty different from the one most regular folks rally around. Throughout the year, high-status flags, like the Pride flag, hang on every high street and building, symbolising a hostile foreign ideology colonising the country. It signals the elite’s preference for every flag but Australia’s. The March for Australia is taking place because the ruling class continues to refuse to listen to the electorate on immigration, and dismiss mainstream ideas like patriotism as far-right. Believing that nations should maintain and enforce their borders is neither radical nor extreme. The belief that multiculturalism is failing is not an extreme viewpoint. To believe that the flag represents national pride and belonging, which unites all patriotic Australians is not ‘un-Australian.’ Let them march." - Noel Yaxley, SkyNews.com.au Contributor and Immigration Commentator

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

General Research #28657

Tony Burke’s ‘nothing could be less Australian’ slur on immigration march protesters exposes Canberra elite's preference for every flag except their own

by Noel Yaxley August 30, 2025

The protesters rallying for migration control on Sunday aren't knuckle-dragging racists, but normal people who think open borders is a bad thing – that's something that will shake the progressive activists to their core, writes Noel Yaxley.

The March for Australia rallies are barely 24 hours away, and it appears Tony Burke has acquired a sudden craving for patriotism.

According to the Home Affairs Minister, “nothing could be less Australian” than the planned demonstrations.

Unfortunately, the flag to which the majority of the ruling class swears allegiance seems pretty different from the one most regular folks rally around.

Throughout the year, high-status flags, like the Pride flag, hang on every high street and building, symbolising a hostile foreign ideology colonising the country.

It signals the elite’s preference for every flag but Australia’s.

Those Burke disingenuously characterises as un-Australian are decent people who believe Australia is a tolerant, liberal society.

They are not ashamed of their country’s past and accept nuanced interpretations of history, unlike those who wallow in perpetual racial grievance.

Even though they have been criticised for being out of touch with modern Australia, they are not the ones who react to the national flag like a vampire to sunlight.

Your ordinary Australian is not the knuckle-dragging racist that the media and academic class portray.

This weekend’s march will draw attention to how mass migration and poor governance are accelerating Australia’s transformation.

According to ABS data, more than 1,000 migrants enter Australia each day under the Albanese government.

From June 2022 to December 2024, more than a million people arrived.

As a result, a third of the population is foreign born, the largest proportion since 1893.

https://www.skynews.com.au/insights-and-analysis/tony-burkes-nothing-could-be-less-australian-slur-on-immigration-march-protesters-exposes-canberra-elites-preference-for-every-flag-except-their-own/news-story/f33c17a896e6d29b504f9e4ce0f5fac8

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122143

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23538724 (021228ZSEP25) Notable: Video: Anti-immigration rallies held across Australia as clashes break out in Adelaide and Melbourne - Anti-immigration rallies have been staged nationwide, with scuffles in Melbourne where police used pepper spray and in Adelaide where a man identifying as a member of the National Socialist Network tried to speak, ending the event. Police reported three arrests, including for assault and disguise offences. In Sydney, thousands marched with chants of “save the nation, stop the invasion,” while counter-protesters carried “no to racism” signs. Federal minister Amanda Rishworth said, “Hate has no place in the Australian community,” while federal MP Bob Katter told a Townsville rally, “When oppression becomes law, then resistance becomes duty.” Shadow Attorney-General Julian Leeser warned of antisemitic and racist undertones as police separated rival groups.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109588 (pb)

Anti-immigration rallies held across Australia as clashes break out in Adelaide and Melbourne

abc.net.au - 31 August 2025

1/2

Scuffles have broken out at anti-immigration rallies held across the country, including in Melbourne, where police have used pepper spray on some of those involved.

Police also had to intervene after a clash at the Adelaide event.

The marches — which were mostly peaceful — have been held across the nation's capital cities and in some regional centres, with counter-demonstrations also organised in several locations.

While some attendees said the "March for Australia" events had nothing to do with race and were aimed at slowing down migration, regardless of where it was coming from, a sign reading "white unity at every opportunity" was visible at the Sydney rally.

In Melbourne, anti-immigration protesters and attendees of a pro-Palestine rally clashed in the CBD.

Hundreds of police blocked the groups from meeting on Swanston Street near Flinders Street Station, but members from both groups marched down other streets away from the blockade.

Several police horses and dozens of police officers swarmed to Bourke Street to separate the protesters.

A glass bottle was thrown, which shattered near the pro-Palestine group as the two sides continued to face off.

In Adelaide, a rally was ended after an altercation broke out when a man who identified himself as a member of the National Socialist Network took to the stage to call for an end to immigration.

Police estimate that 15,000 people took part in Sunday's rally and counter-rally in Adelaide, and said in a statement that the crowds were "generally well-behaved".

Organisers have told the ABC the National Socialist Network had not been invited to speak at the event and that they attempted to stop the speech but were met with resistance.

Police who were monitoring the rally stepped in to break up the scuffle as some protesters chanted "let him speak".

The rally did not resume after that point.

Three people were arrested, including a 23-year-old man for assaulting police and two 32-year-old men for "wearing articles of disguise" and failing to state personal details.

Organiser Mark Aldridge told the ABC the event was about "mass immigration at a time when Aussies are struggling".

"It's not anti-migration," he said.

"The general consensus here is mass immigration; it's just not the right time.

"Whilst there's not enough homes, not enough resources, I think we need to temper migration down and then have a national conversation as adults about the continuation of migration figures."

Earlier, one protester held up a placard emblazoned with the face of alleged police killer and fugitive Dezi Freeman, and captioned with the words "Free Man".

A major search operation for the 56-year-old self-described sovereign citizen remains underway in Victoria.

Police allege Mr Freeman shot three police officers who were executing a warrant at his Porepunkah property, killing two and injuring a third.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122144

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23538742 (021236ZSEP25) Notable: Video: Politicians condemn anti-immigration rallies in eight capital cities - Demonstrators have gathered in cities across the country as part of a series of 'March for Australia' rallies, calling for a reduction in so-called 'mass immigration.' The rallies have drawn condemnation from most federal politicians, who argue that attendees represent a small, vocal segment attempting to undermine social cohesion. -

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109588 (pb)

>>122143

Politicians condemn anti-immigration rallies in eight capital cities

ABC News (Australia)

Aug 31, 2025

Demonstrators have gathered in cities across the country as part of a series of 'March for Australia' rallies, calling for a reduction in so-called 'mass immigration.' The rallies have drawn condemnation from most federal politicians, who argue that attendees represent a small, vocal segment attempting to undermine social cohesion.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JYF3xnxxotQ

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122145

File: a080c260e074340⋯.jpg (178.35 KB,2047x1152,2047:1152,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 6c9cb6351903e53⋯.jpg (497.97 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 4fa774c2e053b80⋯.jpg (488.49 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23538746 (021241ZSEP25) Notable: Freeman placard ignites fury as rival demonstrators clash at anti-immigration protests - Rival rallies across Australia drew thousands, with violent clashes in Melbourne where police used pepper spray, bottles were thrown and six arrests made. In Adelaide, 15,000 people turned out, and a man held a placard of alleged police killer Dezi Freeman captioned “Free Man.” In Canberra, One Nation leader Pauline Hanson told supporters she was “proud” to see large crowds, while Melbourne was marred by a fight between pro-Israel commentator Avi Yemini and neo-Nazi Thomas Sewell. Protest organiser Hugo Lennon attacked Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke for calling the protest “un-Australian,” pledging to rally again on Australia Day. Shadow Attorney-General Julian Leeser warned of antisemitic and racist undertones as police confirmed officer injuries.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109588 (pb)

>>122143

Freeman placard ignites fury as rival demonstrators clash at anti-immigration protests

GEORGIE KIBEL and JACK NIVISON - August 31, 2025

1/2

Rival protesters clashed in ­Melbourne as rallies across the country that included far-right ­extremists called for “mass ­immigration” to end.

The Melbourne CBD was thrown into chaos on Sunday after thousands of people marching from Federation Square to state parliament as part of the “March for Australia” rally were confronted and blocked by counter protesters.

In Adelaide, police estimated 15,000 took to the streets from both groups, and a man was spotted at Rundle Park holding a placard featuring a picture of alleged cop killer Dezi Freeman. The sign featured the words “Free Man”, along with a Southern Cross symbol and black and white photo of the fugitive gunman.

Protesters taunted police officers in Melbourne about the events in Porepunkah, with one man saying “They won’t have anyone looking for Dezi today, they’re all here.”

Another man yelled at officers: “You all have your body cams (cameras) on now, you didn’t at Porepunkah.”

Police said there were similar attendance rates in Sydney, and “no significant incidents”. One woman was arrested for breaching the peace.

In the nation’s capital, about 1000 protesters gathered on Parliament House lawns, where they were addressed by One Nation leader Pauline Hanson. who said she was “proud” to see so many people in attendance.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122146

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23538763 (021247ZSEP25) Notable: Video: Neo-Nazis lead violent anti-immigration march as clashes break out in CBD - Melbourne’s CBD erupted as anti-immigration and counter-protesters clashed, with police using capsicum spray, bean-bag rounds and making six arrests. About 150 National Socialist Network members led the March for Australia, taunting people of colour and attacking pro-Israel commentator Avi Yemini. Neo-Nazi leader Tom Sewell urged unity, declaring his group had defended the “Aussie flag.” In Adelaide, a placard of alleged police killer Dezi Freeman appeared, while in Sydney neo-Nazis handed out flyers and shouted “Heil Australia.” Victorian Police Minister Anthony Carbines called protesters “unhinged grubs.” Organisers Hugo Lennon and Harrison McLean addressed the rally, which also saw an Indigenous speaker pushed offstage as rival groups set fire to Australian and Palestinian flags.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109588 (pb)

>>122143

Neo-Nazis lead violent anti-immigration march as clashes break out in CBD

Michael Bachelard and Cassandra Morgan - August 31, 2025

1/3

Melbourne’s CBD roiled with protest on Sunday as anti-immigration and counter-demonstrators clashed repeatedly, and a large number of police were stretched to cope with a shifting struggle that ranged through the city’s streets for more than four hours.

Police arrested six people and confirmed using capsicum spray and bean-bag guns “to prevent violence between protesters, some of whom were intent on creating conflict and violence”.

Two officers had bottles thrown at them, and others were affected by capsicum spray.

The anti-immigration March for Australia started about 11am at Flinders Street Station, metres from a smaller counter-protest, whose organisers vowed to put up a direct front against racism. The Age estimates about 6000 people took part in the anti-immigration rally.

The counter-protesters were pushed up Swanston Street, where their numbers swelled to about 3000 after weekly pro-Palestinian protesters marched from their usual State Library meeting place to join the demonstration.

Police estimated a total of 5000 people took part in the rallies.

The anti-immigration rally skewed older, male and white, and was made up of a disparate collection of “sovereign citizens”, mainstream right anti-immigration protesters, and anti-government agitators and neo-Nazis. About 150 far-right National Socialist Network (NSN) members led the rally.

After their initial gatherings, both protests splintered into smaller groups, which moved around the city’s streets and lanes, sparking several tense encounters along Swanston and Bourke streets through the afternoon.

Police, including public order response teams and mounted officers, swiftly formed lines to try to keep the opposing groups apart as they taunted each other, at times from a distance of only metres.

Even so, a large number of people were involved in skirmishes and dozens were subdued by capsicum spray. One woman, wearing the anti-immigration rally’s uniform of an Australian flag draped over her shoulders, was attacked by protesters from the other camp on Swanston Street.

Meanwhile, the March for Australia group targeted several people of colour throughout the rally despite repeated declarations from some who said “we’re not racist”. An Asian man was heckled by the NSN contingent before police pulled him away; another man was called “rag-head” and beaten after he yelled “Nazi scum” at the NSN protesters.

Far-right commentator Avi Yemini, who is Jewish and pro-Israeli, was attacked by neo-Nazis as he tried to join the March for Australia.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122147

File: b4f2da0b9a32390⋯.jpg (1.08 MB,4415x2943,4415:2943,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 6ddeabcc6068eb6⋯.jpg (1.23 MB,4178x2785,4178:2785,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 17c3e357212edbc⋯.jpg (3.94 MB,8256x5504,3:2,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23538789 (021256ZSEP25) Notable: PM says some good people marched on Sunday, blames exploitation by neo-Nazis - Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has said “good people” attended Sunday’s anti-immigration rallies but warned they were exploited by neo-Nazis sowing division. Parliament erupted as Labor, the Coalition and the Greens clashed over far-right extremism and the presence of Iranian, Hamas and Hezbollah insignia at pro-Palestine marches. Albanese urged calm, saying multiculturalism defines Australia, while Opposition Leader Sussan Ley said protests were “attended by people of goodwill, but hijacked by violent neo-Nazis.” Greens senator Mehreen Faruqi condemned “racist, white supremacist” rallies and called One Nation MPs “merchants of hate.” Nationals senator Bridget McKenzie shouted back: “Who supported Australian Jews in your team? No one,” as tempers flared across the chamber.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122143

PM says some good people marched on Sunday, blames exploitation by neo-Nazis

Paul Sakkal and Nick Newling - September 1, 2025

Good people attended Sunday’s fiery anti-immigration protests, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has declared, warning that neo-Nazis were exploiting people’s grievances to spread hatred.

Parliament erupted on Monday as Labor, the Coalition and the Greens blamed one another for fuelling the hostility displayed by far-right extremists on Sunday and those waving terror group insignia at pro-Palestine rallies.

But after Labor ministers spent the day decrying the weekend’s anti-immigration demonstrations as racist, Albanese took a more measured tone on Monday afternoon, acknowledging the anxieties of disaffected Australians while calling out extremism.

“Multiculturalism is a part of who we are as a modern nation,” Albanese said on ABC’s Afternoon Briefing.

“I’d just say to people, and I have no doubt that there would have been good people who went along, heard about a rally, concerned [about social problems] … have a look at who you were with on Sunday.

“The motivation that they have, which isn’t actually about housing or our economy or anything else, it’s about sowing division. Neo-Nazis have no role.”

Political debate was on Monday consumed by the topics of migration and social cohesion, carrying echoes of the previous term of parliament when former Coalition leader Peter Dutton often focused on antisemitism.

His successor, Sussan Ley, has struck a more centrist tone on migration. Before question time, Ley delivered a statement to the parliament saying pro-Palestinian marches had fuelled division and that the weekend’s rallies were “attended by people of goodwill, but hijacked by violent neo-Nazis spouting hate and racism”.

“The prime minister must show that leadership now,” she said.

The March for Australia rallies across the country on Sunday seized on growing community anxiety about the rate of migration since the pandemic, while promoting other far-right and anti-government sentiments.

“Net overseas migration is falling,” Albanese said on Monday. “Of course there was going to be an increased number after the lockdown of our entire continent.

“We are getting the numbers down. But migration also is important.”

Senators brawled as they tried to agree on a symbolic written motion condemning fringe elements involved in Sunday’s rallies, which sparked a national conversation on attitudes towards non-white Australians.

An initial motion moved by Greens senator Mehreen Faruqi condemned “racist, white supremacist” marches and called out MPs who attended them. No major party politicians attended but One Nation senators Pauline Hanson and Malcolm Roberts, as well as under-fire MP Bob Katter, went.

Faruqi’s motion claimed racism had been “normalised and legitimised” by politicians and the media who “fan the flames of hate”.

Faruqi described One Nation senators as “merchants of hate … who have nothing to offer but their racism and white supremacy”.

Both Labor and the Coalition offered their own amended version of the motion. Labor’s – which was ultimately successful – softened much of the language in the Greens amendment but was substantively similar.

The Coalition’s amendment focused on the commitment to “free speech and lawful assembly”. It went further than others, to condemn rallies by “pro-Iranian government extremists and those supporting terrorist organisations”, a swing at pro-Palestinian marches that featured Iranian, Hamas and Hezbollah iconography.

Strong words flew across the chamber amid the debate. Greens senator David Shoebridge accused the Coalition of wanting “to be in a position to platform neo-Nazis” to divide Australians on the lines of race.

Nationals senator Bridget McKenzie shouted back: “Who supported Australian Jews in your team? No one.”

Shoebridge compared the quote of a neo-Nazi – “we need to send them back, no debate, no discussion” – to remarks from Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke regarding sending former detainees with criminal convictions to Nauru – “anyone who doesn’t have a valid visa should leave the country”.

The comparison drew a rebuke from Finance Minister Katy Gallagher, who said to Shoebridge: “You are an absolute disgrace.”

Later in the debate, McKenzie accused Faruqi of double standards by not condemning pro-Palestine protesters on the Sydney Harbour Bridge who held a poster of Iranian leader Ayatollah Khamenei holding a machine gun.

“Where’s your motion for that?” McKenzie called out.

https://www.theage.com.au/politics/federal/pm-says-some-good-people-marched-on-sunday-blames-exploitation-by-neo-nazis-20250901-p5mrd6.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122148

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23538799 (021301ZSEP25) Notable: Video: Premier hits back at neo-Nazi ‘goons’ who gatecrashed press conference - Victorian Premier Jacinta Allan has condemned neo-Nazis after National Socialist Network leader Thomas Sewell and associate Nathan Bull gatecrashed her press conference with Treasurer Jaclyn Symes, forcing its abandonment. Allan said she was “unharmed and undeterred” and wore the neo-Nazis’ hatred “as a badge of honour,” vowing to defend multicultural, LGBTIQA+, First Peoples and Jewish communities. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese called the incident “horrific,” noting extremists were “openly in uniform” at Sunday’s rallies. Police confirmed Allan’s security team intervened as Sewell shouted claims that Australians are being denied the right to protest. Sewell later appeared in court contesting separate charges including intimidating a police officer and breaching safety orders.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122143

Premier hits back at neo-Nazi ‘goons’ who gatecrashed press conference

Rachel Eddie and Erin Pearson - September 2, 2025

1/2

Premier Jacinta Allan has condemned neo-Nazis who gatecrashed a press conference she was holding with Treasurer Jaclyn Symes at the edge of Melbourne’s CBD on Tuesday morning, saying she was not afraid.

The premier and the treasurer were forced to abandon the press conference when Thomas Sewell, leader of the National Socialist Network, began yelling at Allan as police tried to separate him from the politicians and media in West Melbourne.

Allan and Symes quickly left, along with backbench MP Sheena Watt, and the press conference at Eades Park was abandoned.

Sewell falsely claimed that Australians did not have the right to protest and incorrectly said 50,000 protesters attended the anti-immigration March for Australia that descended into violence in Melbourne on Sunday. This masthead estimates about 6000 people took part in the rally.

In a statement released late on Tuesday morning, Allan said she was OK and wore the neo-Nazis’ hatred of her “as a badge of honour”.

“I am unharmed and undeterred following this morning’s events at a press conference,” the premier said. “But this isn’t about me. It’s about all the other people in the community who Nazis target – like multicultural people, LGBTIQA+ people, First Peoples, and Jews.”

She said “these goons” will fail in their attempt to whip up fear and divide Victoria, adding: “As premier, I’ll always be out and about in public fighting for you, like I am all day today. I am not afraid.”

In this morning’s caucus meeting in Canberra, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese was made aware of neo-Nazis gatecrashing Allan’s press conference, an incident he labelled “horrific”.

Albanese went on to say he was stunned that neo-Nazis were “openly in uniform” at Sunday’s anti-immigration demonstrations.

But, he added: “We have to make sure we give people space to move away, and to not push them further down that rabbit hole.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122149

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23538806 (021306ZSEP25) Notable: Video: Neo-Nazi Thomas Sewell arrested outside Melbourne court over alleged attack on Indigenous protest site - Neo-Nazi leader Thomas Sewell has been arrested outside Melbourne Magistrates’ Court over an alleged assault on Camp Sovereignty, a sacred Aboriginal site in Kings Domain targeted during Sunday’s anti-immigration rallies. Police confirmed detectives detained Sewell, 32, for questioning, though no charges have yet been laid. Sewell had earlier disrupted Premier Jacinta Allan’s press conference, shouting false claims that Australians lack protest rights and that 50,000 attended Sunday’s rally. Allan declared, “I am not afraid. We know how these goons operate. They whip up fear to divide our society. They will fail.” She also announced an anti-hate taskforce with Victoria Police, warning extremists were exploiting social divisions to spread racism and fear.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122143

>>122148

Neo-Nazi Thomas Sewell arrested outside Melbourne court over alleged attack on Indigenous protest site

Victoria police confirm arrest hours after the neo-Nazi confronted Victorian premier Jacinta Allan at a press conference

Benita Kolovos - 2 Sep 2025

Neo-Nazi Thomas Sewell has been arrested outside a Melbourne court over an alleged attack on Camp Sovereignty, a sacred Aboriginal burial ground in Kings Domain and longstanding protest site on Sunday.

Victoria police have confirmed detectives from the Melbourne crime investigation unit arrested Sewell, 32, and two associates – a 23-year-old man from Mooroolbark and a 20-year-old man from Ardeer – outside Melbourne’s magistrates court about 3.20pm on Tuesday.

“They are being interviewed in relation to an ongoing investigation into alleged assaults in King’s Domain about 5pm on 31 August,” police said.

No charges have been laid.

Sewell, the leader of the National Socialist Network, was in court for the second day of a three-day contested hearing related to charges of intimidating police and breaching multiple personal intervention orders.

He was representing himself in the matter before magistrate Michelle Hodgson.

He was separated from the premier by her security detail and the trio quickly left the park, with the press conference abandoned.

The prime minister, Anthony Albanese, speaking at a party room meeting of Labor MPs in Canberra immediately after the incident, branded it “horrific”.

In a statement, Allan said she was “unharmed and undeterred” after the press conference.

“It comes as no surprise that Nazis oppose me and my government. I wear that as a badge of honour,” she said.

“But this isn’t about me. It’s about all the other people in the community who Nazis target – like multicultural people, LGBTIQA+ people, First Peoples and Jews.

“They’re the Victorians who are on my mind right now, and they’re the Victorians who our anti-hate laws will protect when they come into force later this month.”

Allan said there was “no place for hate” in the state and she would continue to be “out and about in public” fighting for all Victorians’ “right to belong”.

“I am not afraid. We know how these goons operate. They whip up fear to divide our society. They will fail. Because Victorians are fair, and our values are strong,” she said.

Later on Tuesday, she met with multicultural and multifaith groups in Hampton Park, in Melbourne’s south-east.

“Memo to no one in particular: this is what the real Victoria looks like. And we’re better for it,” she posted on X.

“Different families, different faiths, but the same Victorian values: love for our neighbours, respect for each other, and pride in ourselves.”

Allan was answering questions on the incident at Camp Sovereignty, and Sewell’s role in the rally, at the time he approached her.

Speaking generally, she had condemned the “despicable acts of violence and racism” that occurred at the weekend and announced she would be convening an anti-hate taskforce with Victoria police in response.

“The anti-hate taskforce [will] both look at the incidents over the weekend, but also understand too, that this goes beyond just being a law and order issue. There is something deeper going on here,” Allan said.

“People’s sense of economic security is being exploited by a small number of people, who are wanting to use cracks in our society and exploit them to drive division in our society.”

She said it had a been a “tough time” for many Australians but the solution was “not what this small number of people are trying to sell”.

“The pathway to social cohesion is in building a stronger society, a place where people have jobs, people have rights and are respected,” Allan said.

During the ambush, Sewell falsely claimed that 50,000 people attended the anti-immigration March for Australia in Melbourne on Sunday. Victoria police estimated about 5,000 people attended the march and counter-rallies.

He also falsely claimed Australians did not have the right to protest, despite being able to deliver a speech to the anti-immigration rally from the front steps of the Victorian parliament.

https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2025/sep/02/jacinta-allan-not-afraid-neo-nazi-goons-after-press-conference-gatecrashed-ntwnfb

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zvuLdmfkzvw

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122150

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23538832 (021321ZSEP25) Notable: Video: Neo-Nazi leader arrested outside court after attack on Indigenous encampment - Neo-Nazi leader Thomas Sewell has been arrested outside Melbourne Magistrates’ Court over an alleged assault on Camp Sovereignty, a sacred Indigenous burial site in Southbank. Police said detectives detained Sewell, 32, and two associates, including Nathan Bull, hours after he had heckled Premier Jacinta Allan with cries of “Heil, Australia.” Video captured Sewell and dozens of National Socialist Network members charging the encampment following Sunday’s anti-immigration rally. Sewell was at court representing himself on separate charges of intimidating a police officer and breaching safety orders, and clashed with officers over claims of bias at protests. Supporters Jacob Hersant and Jimeone Roberts attended, with Hersant appealing a conviction for an illegal Nazi salute.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122143

>>122148

>>122149

Neo-Nazi leader arrested outside court after attack on Indigenous encampment

Cameron Houston - September 2, 2025

1/2

Prominent neo-Nazi Thomas Sewell has been arrested outside a Melbourne court after his group attacked an Indigenous encampment on Sunday.

Two other members of the National Socialist Network, including right-wing extremist Nathan Bull, were also arrested outside the Melbourne Magistrates’ Court, where about 25 police officers had gathered on Tuesday afternoon.

Sewell was placed in handcuffs at 3.25pm, but he remained defiant outside the court on William Street.

“This is what happens in the tyranny of Victoria. You’re under arrest for defending yourself,” Sewell shouted before he was bundled into a police van.

A detective from the Melbourne crime investigation unit confirmed Tuesday’s arrests were related to the attack on Camp Sovereignty at the weekend.

Video footage captured Sewell and dozens of others charging Camp Sovereignty – a sacred Indigenous burial site and the location of a permanent vigil in Melbourne’s Southbank – on Sunday evening after that day’s anti-immigration March for Australia rally in the CBD.

Sewell had been in court contesting unrelated charges inside the building, when two unidentified men entered courtroom 27 and got into a heated confrontation with the neo-Nazi and his supporters.

The verbal altercation on level 6 of the Magistrates’ Court had to be broken up by about a dozen police officers and protective services officers.

About 10 of Sewell’s supporters and 25 police and protective services officers had gathered outside the court on Tuesday before the arrests.

One of the men arrested was wearing a black jacket bearing the message “F*ck off we’re full”.

Just hours before the arrests, on his way to his court hearing, Sewell derailed a press conference being held by Premier Jacinta Allan and Treasurer Jaclyn Symes, heckling Allan and saying “Heil, Australia” before being pushed away by security.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122151

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23538869 (021336ZSEP25) Notable: Golden Grove man to face court over placard of Dezi Freeman pictured at anti-immigration rally - A 39-year-old man from Golden Grove has been charged after displaying a placard of alleged police killer Dezi Freeman at Adelaide’s March for Australia rally. The sign featured Freeman’s image alongside the words “Free Man” and a Southern Cross symbol. Police said the man attended a station on Tuesday after authorities urged him to come forward and was charged with offensive behaviour. He was bailed to appear in the Adelaide Magistrates Court on October 28. South Australian Premier Peter Malinauskas had also called for him to surrender. Freeman, 56, remains on the run after allegedly killing Detective Leading Senior Constable Neal Thompson and Senior Constable Vadim De Waart in Porepunkah, with more than 400 police engaged in a major manhunt.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109588 (pb)

>>122143

>>122145

Golden Grove man to face court over placard of Dezi Freeman pictured at anti-immigration rally

Authorities had urged the man who displayed the sign to come forward.

Bryce Luff - 2 September 2025

A man has been charged over a placard depicting alleged cop killer Dezi Freeman that was brandished during an anti-immigration rally on Sunday.

Besides the likeness of fugitive Freeman, the poster displayed at Adelaide’s March For Australia also had the words “Free Man” and a Southern Cross symbol.

A 39-year-old from Golden Grove, in Adelaide’s northeast, attended a police station on Tuesday after authorities had urged him to come forward.

“After being interviewed, he was charged with offensive behaviour,” SA Police said.

The accused was bailed to appear in the Adelaide Magistrates Court on October 28.

SA Premier Peter Malinauskas had also urged the accused to turn himself in.

Meanwhile Freeman, 56, remains on the run after allegedly shooting dead two police officers at his Porepunkah property, 300km northeast of Melbourne, a week ago.

More than 400 police are searching high and low across Victoria’s high country.

People have been warned not to approach him because he might be armed.

https://7news.com.au/news/golden-grove-man-to-face-court-over-placard-of-dezi-freeman-pictured-at-anti-immigration-rally-c-19887329

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7dqlzYlaQbk

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122152

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23542244 (030320ZSEP25) Notable: Video: Prime minister insists $408 million deportation deal with Nauru not a 'secret - Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has defended a $408 million agreement to send members of the so-called NZYQ cohort to Nauru, rejecting claims it was hidden. The group consists of people released from immigration detention after the High Court ruled indefinite detention unlawful. The agreement, signed by Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke with Nauruan President David Adeang, also includes $70 million in annual support, though key details such as numbers, timeframes and upfront payments remain unclear. Albanese said “it’s hardly secret” and that people with no visa rights must leave Australia. Human rights lawyers and crossbench MPs condemned the deal, with senator David Pocock calling it “a cynical and eye-wateringly expensive political fix.”

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109487 (pb)

>>109571 (pb)

>>109581 (pb)

Prime minister insists $408 million deportation deal with Nauru not a 'secret'

Maani Truu - 1 September 2025

1/2

The prime minister has insisted a deal worth hundreds of millions of dollars struck by his home affairs minister during an unannounced trip to Nauru was "hardly a secret", while refusing to say what the total cost would be.

Australia has agreed to pay the tiny island nation more than $408 million to accept members of the so-called NZYQ cohort, and almost $70 million per year to cover their costs, under the deal inked on Friday.

Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke signed the memorandum of understanding with Nauruan President David Adeang during a trip last week.

A statement announcing the deal was quietly uploaded to the Department of Home Affairs website on Friday. But it was not publicised or shared widely with journalists, as is common practice.

"It's hardly secret, you just are asking me about it on national TV," Prime Minister Anthony Albanese told ABC's Afternoon Briefing on Monday.

"It was reported. Tony Burke went to the Nauruan Parliament and spoke with the Nauru government. There's nothing secret about it."

In a tense back and forth, the prime minister refused to elaborate on the details of the arrangement.

That included whether the $400 million payment would be up-front, how many people would need to be resettled in return or the time frame for the yearly payments.

He said further details would be "released appropriately" in tandem with Nauru, but did not provide a timeline for when.

"It's an arrangement between our government and the Nauruan government and ... there's complexities and details here, including the number of people who go, there's a range of provisions as part of it," he said.

The group slated for deportation were in Australian immigration detention before a landmark 2023 High Court decision ruled it was unlawful to hold people with no reasonable prospects of removal indefinitely.

Hundreds of detainees were released into the community as a result of the ruling, but it is unclear how many Nauru is required to accept under the arrangement.

Many in the cohort have been convicted of violent offences, but have served their sentences.

"People who have no rights to be here need to be found somewhere to go," Mr Albanese said.

"We make no apologies for the fact that we have been very clear about trying to deal with a decision of the High Court."

In a statement posted to social media over the weekend, the Nauruan government echoed the language of the Australian government.

It said the agreement included "undertakings for the proper treatment and long-term residence of people who have no legal right to stay in Australia" in Nauru.

"Australia will provide funding to underpin this arrangement and support Nauru’s long-term economic resilience," the statement read.

The payment from Australia would go towards supporting "Nauru's long-term economic resilience", according to the government.

A statement uploaded to the Department of Home Affairs website on Friday confirmed a deal was signed after Mr Burke met with the president and members of the Nauruan cabinet.

"Anyone who doesn’t have a valid visa should leave the country," Mr Burke said in a statement.

"This is a fundamental element of a functioning visa system."

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122153

File: 9aa94048aac29c1⋯.jpg (84.47 KB,768x1025,768:1025,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 99f020d96d6ac7a⋯.jpg (360.53 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: ed94424dd70692b⋯.jpg (453.28 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23542433 (030417ZSEP25) Notable: Donald Day Jr, US conspiracy theorist connected to Wieambilla killers, agrees to watered-down plea deal – Arizona-based conspiracy theorist Donald Day Jr, who praised the 2022 Wieambilla police killers, has reached a plea deal to admit possessing firearms as a convicted felon, while prosecutors drop three other charges including threats against US police. Day, known online as “Geronimo’s Bones,” had called Gareth and Stacey Train his “brave brother and sister” after they murdered Queensland officers Matthew Arnold and Rachel McCrow and neighbour Alan Dare. Court filings list 34 weapons — including rifles, pistols, a revolver, and large quantities of ammunition — stored in a mobile home “gun room.” The plea limits punishment to the low end of sentencing ranges, pending court approval.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109588 (pb)

>>122145

>>122151

‘Lay down your guns’; top cop’s direct message to accused killer Dezi Freeman

MOHAMMAD ALFARES - August 29, 2025

1/3

Victoria’s top cop Mike Bush has revealed 450 police officers are involved in the hunt for Dezi Freeman and made a direct appeal to the accused double killer: “Lay down your firearms.”

The chief commissioner vowed that the police taskforce would stay on the front lines in the Victorian high country region until Freeman, 56, was caught.

“In fact, if that person is listening, it really is time to lay down your firearms and give yourself up so that we can all bring this to a safe conclusion and this community can get back to what they love to do,” he said, before vowing to keep hunting the suspect.

“We are not leaving here until this person is in custody,” Mr Bush said.

The chief commissioner revealed there were 450 Victoria Police officers involved in the manhunt. “The number one priority for the Victoria Police is to find the person who murdered our officers,” he said.

Flanked by Premier Jacinta Allan and Police Minister Anthony Carbines, Mr Bush said officers from the AFP and interstate forces including NSW, South Australia and the ACT had joined the “professional and coordinated” operation in Victoria’s high country.

“It’s very important that as Chief Commissioner I’m here to support our people. They have every resource they need to locate the person responsible for this horrific homicide,” he said.

Mr Bush warned: “Whoever is considering aiding him in this escape is aiding in a criminal offence.”

On the arrest of Mali Freeman, the suspect’s wife, overnight, Mr Bush said there “may or may not be” charges that follow.

“People were interviewed totally and specifically in relation to the homicide investigation. So those searches have been completed, the interviews have been conducted, those people have been released. There may or may not be charges that follow, but it would be very inappropriate for me to say anything else at this point,” he said.

The top cop also acknowledged the “devastating” loss of Detective Leading Senior Constable Neil Thompson and Detective Senior Constable Vadim De Waart.

Funeral arrangements for the fallen officers will be made in due course.

Police arrested Mali Freeman, the wife of the alleged cop killer on Thursday night after searching a property in Porepunkah.

As the manhunt for the alleged cop killer stretches into a fourth day, police confirmed on Friday morning that officers took two people into custody as they ramp up the investigation into the ambush shooting of two police officers on Tuesday.

Fugitive squad detectives, along with Special Operations Group officers, raided the property at about 8.40pm on Thursday and arrested Mali Freeman, 42, and a 15-year-old boy.

“The Porepunkah pair were interviewed and released pending further inquiries,” police said in a statement.

“The arrests form part of the ongoing investigation into the deaths of Detective Leading Senior Constable Neal Thompson and Senior Constable Vadim De Waart, who were killed in the line of duty.

“A third officer, a 56-year-old male detective leading senior constable, remains in hospital after being shot in the lower body.

Police have confirmed funeral dates for Detective Leading Senior Constable Thompson and Senior Constable De Waart. They will be farewelled with full honours at the Victoria Police Academy in Glen Waverley, Melbourne. Senior Constable De Waart’s service will be held at 11am on Friday, September 5, with Leading Senior Constable Thompson’s on Monday, September 8, at 11am.

“Extensive searches remain ongoing for the offender Desmond Filby, also known as Desmond Freeman, whose location remains unknown.”

As the high country manhunt for alleged police killer Freeman continues, new details have emerged about the fatal shooting that claimed the lives of two Victoria Police officers.

Freeman is alleged to have fired a homemade shotgun through the door and window of a bus he had been living in on the outskirts of Porepunkah, striking Detective Leading Senior Constable Thompson and Senior Constable De Waart.

It comes as police remain tight-lipped about a late-night operation on Thursday, which is believed to be linked to a family member of Freeman.

The Australian photographed Freeman’s wife, Mali, being escorted by detectives barefoot at about 8.40pm on Chandler Court. She was seen holding a baby and being taken away in a police vehicle.

An officer speaking over a loudspeaker was heard advising people to “come out with nothing in your hands”.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122154

File: fb5340b70e68db1⋯.jpg (115.6 KB,1080x1080,1:1,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 44daeffccd84631⋯.jpg (92.94 KB,800x600,4:3,Clipboard.jpg)

File: ebe5c9789829432⋯.jpg (612.15 KB,2304x1536,3:2,Clipboard.jpg)

File: d1ce0d649e67371⋯.jpg (356.19 KB,890x780,89:78,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23542517 (030446ZSEP25) Notable: Police reviewing 'remarkable' amount of Dezi Freeman information a week after Porepunkah shooting - Victoria Police say they have received a “remarkable” volume of information as the manhunt for accused double killer Dezi Freeman enters its second week. Superintendent Brett Kahan confirmed officers believe Freeman is alive and being harboured, urging those assisting him to come forward. Freeman, 56, allegedly killed Detective Leading Senior Constable Neal Thompson and Senior Constable Vadim De Waart at his Porepunkah property while police executed a warrant for historical sex offences, and injured a third officer. More than 450 tips have been received, with police saturating towns around Mount Buffalo National Park, expanding the search to Wangaratta, and considering a reward. Funerals for Thompson and De Waart will be held with full honours in coming days.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122153

Police reviewing 'remarkable' amount of Dezi Freeman information a week after Porepunkah shooting

Mikaela Ortolan - 2 September 2025

1/2

A week on from the shooting deaths of two police officers in Victoria's north-east, investigators are changing their approach to finding the man believed to be responsible.

Dezi Freeman vanished into bushland around his Porepunkah property after he allegedly opened fire on a group of police officers as they attempted to execute a warrant for historical sex offences.

Detective Leading Senior Constable Neal Thompson and Senior Constable Vadim De Waart were killed in the shooting, while a third officer was seriously injured.

On Monday, police said their tack would change as the search for the fugitive, believed to be heavily armed, continued.

During a press conference Superintendent Brett Kahan said officers believe Mr Freeman was alive and was being helped.

"People know the whereabouts of the person who has [allegedly] killed two cops," he said on Monday.

"People have chosen for whatever reason, not to come forward."

He urged anyone potentially harbouring the 56-year-old or who might know where he is, to come forward so police could formulate a surrender plan.

Police will continue to saturate towns around Porepunkah in the hope that someone will approach them with information that could lead to a breakthrough.

They specifically want information on locations the fugitive may have previously visited within Mount Buffalo National Park, which remains closed.

The search appeared to expand to Wangaratta on Tuesday afternoon, about 72 kilometres from Porepunkah.

A number of streets were closed while police attended properties in the area which the ABC understands is connected to search efforts for Mr Freeman.

Victoria Police would not confirm that, saying it would not comment on operational activity.

On Monday, officers established a public information caravan in the nearby town of Bright to encourage community members to come forward with information that could assist in their search.

Providing an update on Tuesday morning, Superintendent Kahan said police had received a "remarkable" amount of information in the past 18 hours.

He also said that posting a reward in relation for information was "an avenue that we will explore".

"All I say is that the number of police in the area is increasing at the end of the week [since the shooting]," he said.

"So instead of decreasing our commitment to this, we're increasing, and we'll continue to throw the full arm of Victoria Police towards the search for this armed fugitive."

Police also returned to Mr Freeman's property in recent days. However, they will not reveal what prompted them to conduct further investigations there.

Large-scale operation continues, community 'on edge'

The last confirmed sighting of Mr Freeman, according to police, was at the time of the shooting, despite officers looking into a number of alleged sightings reported by the public.

It has left members of the local community uneasy as they try to return to normality.

One resident, Andrea Siede, said she feels "on edge".

"Especially at night-time," she said.

"It is so dark around here — there's no street lights … so we're basically on edge every night."

Ms Siede and her husband own two caravan parks at the foot of Mount Buffalo, where the fugitive was believed to have run towards.

"Every noise you hear, every car that goes past the park … at night time it's probably the worst," she said.

Helicopters continued to fly overhead and hundreds of police officers, including from the Australian Federal Police and interstate, have descended on the picturesque Alpine town.

Superintendent Kahan said more than 450 pieces of information had been received as of Monday.

Multiple search warrants had been executed in relation to the manhunt and a number of people arrested, including Mr Freeman's wife, Amalia Freeman, and their teenage son.

Ms Freeman and her son were released pending further inquiries and on Sunday, she issued a statement through her lawyer, calling on her husband to hand himself in.

Police confirmed Ms Freeman was in contact with authorities.

"Speaking to police and cooperating is two different things," Superintendent Kahan said.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122155

File: 4430d1e48060578⋯.jpg (366.19 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: d8dd5232262b41c⋯.jpg (231.68 KB,2047x1152,2047:1152,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23542594 (030506ZSEP25) Notable: Fears China will try to gatecrash Pacific Islands Forum through embassy - Australian and Pacific officials fear China will use its Honiara embassy to influence next week’s Pacific Islands Forum, despite a ban on dialogue and development partners imposed by Solomon Islands to exclude Taiwan. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese will attend amid tensions, with Penny Wong and others warning that sidelining longstanding partners such as the EU, UK and World Bank denies vital funding. Palau’s President Surangel Whipps Jnr said Chinese access would “undermine trust,” while Tuvalu’s Prime Minister Feleti Teo speculated Beijing drove the exclusions. The US ambassador will attend on the sidelines. Beijing pressured PIF participants to alter last year’s communique, resulting in the deletion of Taiwan’s partner status, recognised since 1992.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109487 (pb)

>>109547 (pb)

>>109571 (pb)

>>109581 (pb)

>>122152

Fears China will try to gatecrash Pacific Islands Forum through embassy

BEN PACKHAM - 2 September 2025

1/2

Australian and Pacific officials have warned that China will attempt to gatecrash the region’s annual leaders’ summit in Honiara next week, despite ostensibly being banned with other partner nations as part of Solomon Islands’ plan to keep out Taiwan.

China already has at least 15 accredited diplomats and 12 police based in its Honiara embassy, and there are concerns it has brought in additional personnel ahead of the Pacific Islands Forum to influence regional leaders and the forum’s final statement.

Anthony Albanese will attend the summit amid ongoing tensions within the 18-member bloc over the ban on PIF dialogue and development partners sought by the summit’s Beijing-friendly host to prevent Taiwanese officials from entering the country.

PIF foreign ministers grudgingly agreed to the temporary rule change at a meeting last month, despite concerns raised by Penny Wong and other Pacific nations that longstanding partners would be unable to participate in the summit, denying the region vital development funding.

A senior Australian official said Beijing was expected to skirt the ban, using its embassy to “push in” and gain access to PIF delegates.

Palau President Surangel Whipps Jnr, whose government recognises Taiwan, said he was also concerned Beijing would seek to interfere in the summit.

“I assume China will try (to participate),” he told The Australian. “The Solomons must follow exactly what it requested, which was to keep all partners out.

“Any attempt to let China in will undermine the trust that has been established which has brought the forum together and made it stronger.”

This year’s rule change was agreed amid a review of the PIF’s architecture that will determine how the bloc deals with outside nations and multilateral organisations.

Beijing’s embassy in Tonga demanded last month that Pacific leaders amend what it said was an “erroneous” 33-year-old communique recognising Taiwan’s right to participate in the PIF’s annual forum, arguing it violated the “One China principle”.

While the review is ongoing, Mr Whipps said all PIF partners would be welcome when Palau hosted the 2026 leaders’ summit.

“We believe in a free and open Indo-Pacific which welcomes everyone, follows the rules-based order and is not guided by outside countries’ politics to exclude partners,” he said.

The Prime Minister’s visit to the Solomon Islands’ capital will be bookended by stops in Vanuatu and Papua New Guinea, where he will sign major strategic agreements and announce hundreds of millions of dollars of Australian government support.

Australia has provided $20m in support for the PIF meeting, including a cybersecurity system to forum organisers to protect delegates’ communications from Chinese hackers.

But in a break from usual practice, Mr Albanese is not expected to unveil any major funding commitments for the PIF host nation during next week’s summit.

Associate Professor Anna Powles, from New Zealand’s Massey University, said there was nothing preventing non-Pacific diplomats with a presence in Solomon Islands from trying to pursue their own agendas.

“There is no doubt that those nations who are already in Honiara will seek to engage in bilateral meetings with forum member states,” she said.

“China’s embassy is likely to seek to engage with all visiting forum members delegations that are aligned to Beijing and will no doubt seek to press aligned countries on Taiwan issues.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122156

File: 4797badd12a197f⋯.jpg (145.28 KB,1280x721,1280:721,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 7680fdd0f4073cb⋯.jpg (150.18 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23542657 (030527ZSEP25) Notable: Dan Andrews, Bob Carr guests of honour in Chinese victory parade - Former premiers Dan Andrews and Bob Carr will join Xi Jinping, Kim Jong-un and Vladimir Putin at a Tiananmen Square parade marking 80 years since Japan’s defeat, with Beijing hailing them as “esteemed guests.” Carr defended his attendance as recognition of China’s WWII role, saying its resistance shielded Australia from Japanese assault, while critics warned both men risk serving Chinese propaganda. Chinese ambassador to Australia Xiao Qian recently invoked wartime ties to argue “Taiwan’s return to China must not be denied.” Analysts highlighted Andrews’ Belt and Road links and Carr’s advocacy for closer ties with Beijing. Former ambassador Geoff Raby said Australia must weigh recognition of China’s V-Day celebrations against Australia’s vital relationship with Japan.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Dan Andrews, Bob Carr guests of honour in Chinese victory parade

JAMES DOWLING - August 29, 2025

1/2

Former Labor state premiers Bob Carr and Dan Andrews will attend a sprawling military parade in Tiananmen Square marking 80 years since the end of China’s war with Japan alongside Xi Jinping, Kim Jong-un and Vladimir Putin, the Chinese government has announced.

The Chinese Communist Party’s Assistant Foreign Minister Hong Lei announced on Thursday the two “former statesmen” would be esteemed guests at the official ceremony held on September 3, marking the “victory of the Chinese people’s war of resistance against Japanese aggression and the world anti-fascist war”. Their visit has left some foreign policy experts on high alert, saying the pair risked “becoming organs of the Chinese propaganda machine”.

Joining China’s President in this historic acknowledgment of “anti-fascism” will be North Korean dictator Kim and the Russian President.

Mr Carr told The Australian he was attending the event in order to mark China and Australia’s shared military history during World War II, arguing that Chinese resistance defended Australia from direct naval assault by Japan.

The Australian understands the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade was not consulted on the attendance plans of Australians outside of government.

When asked if the appearance of Putin and Kim gave him pause in attending the event, Mr Carr said he would be “spending (his) time with two former New Zealand prime ministers and acquaintances from Southeast Asia”.

“I’ve met Putin before. I met him at the G20 in St Petersburg (in 2013); I would not expect to meet him again,” the former foreign affairs minister said. “The Australian people support a good bilateral relationship with China.

“It makes it all the more important that we Australians here (are) acknowledging that China’s victory in World War II was historically very important, including for Australia. That’s what’s being celebrated.”

Mr Andrews and Foreign Minister Penny Wong were contacted for comment. The Australian understands Defence and DFAT officials from the Australian embassy in China will attend the event.

“I’m not tremendously surprised that those two are going. They’ve been quite clear in their recent dance that they view the PRC fairly favourably and don’t seem to have tremendous problems going to events that clearly have a proper propaganda function like this,” Australian Strategic Policy Institute senior adviser Alex Bristow said.

“It is entirely reasonable that we recognise the sacrifice of the Chinese people … It doesn’t necessarily mean you can therefore go to an event which is clearly aligned with CCP propaganda.

“It is not about trying to brush past the tremendous sacrifice the Chinese people made; we should be open about that and some of our histories have not sufficiently acknowledged that, but by going to this event Andrews and Carr becoming organs of the Chinese propaganda machine.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122157

File: 0727777833faf3f⋯.jpg (356.77 KB,1758x1240,879:620,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 498eec998c2dc9f⋯.jpg (1.9 MB,5594x3900,2797:1950,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23542705 (030545ZSEP25) Notable: OPINION: Beijing invited me to this special celebration. Here’s why I’m happy to go - "Australians in 1945 would have seen China’s victory over Japan as a win for humanity… worth commemorating… It’s why I accepted an invitation from the Chinese consul-general to attend the 80th celebration of their victory, travelling to Beijing at my own expense. Right-wing commentators criticise me for going because Russian President Vladimir Putin will be in attendance. This comes from the same Trump-friendly media that found acceptable Donald Trump welcoming Putin onto American soil, even as Putin intensified his warfare against Ukraine… What attracts me to this celebration… is the attendance of big delegations from nine countries in South-East Asia… another opportunity to share views about how we accommodate a reality none of us has the power to stop anyway: China’s emergence as a great power - and the need to avoid conflict between it and the US." - Bob Carr, The Age

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122156

OPINION: Beijing invited me to this special celebration. Here’s why I’m happy to go

Bob Carr, Former NSW premier and former Australian foreign affairs minister - September 1, 2025

1/2

When Australians at their Bakelite radios heard of China’s victory over Japan in 1945, they knew this was the triumph of an ally. World War II had started with the Rape of Nanjing in 1937 and the Chinese lost 20 million people resisting the invasion.

Australians also knew the link between these sacrifices and our own security. Chinese armies had kept 1 million Japanese troops tied down. According to historian John Hirst, this made it impossible for the Japanese navy in 1942 to win its case for an invasion of Australia. The Imperial Army could not spare the divisions.

With a father who had served in the Pacific and a mother who was in the army along with an aunt and two uncles, I learnt as a kid about the Chinese theatre of the war. It’s why I accepted an invitation from the Chinese consul-general to attend the 80th celebration of their victory, travelling to Beijing at my own expense.

The Chinese experience touches Australian history. The horrors of the war, reported extensively in Australia, had led waterside workers in the Illawarra in 1938 to strike rather than load Japanese vessels with iron used to make bombs to drop on Chinese civilians. This was heroic when unemployment was at Depression levels.

When Winston Churchill tried to get Australian troops to Burma, it was to help keep supply routes open into China. Both he and Franklin Roosevelt were determined to keep China in the war. Chinese victory was a vital Allied war aim.

Right-wing commentators criticise me for going because Russian President Vladimir Putin will be in attendance. This comes from the same Trump-friendly media that found acceptable Donald Trump welcoming Putin onto American soil, even as Putin intensified his warfare against Ukraine. This was a diplomatic triumph beyond Kremlin fantasies.

Why would China exclude Putin from a celebration of the end of the war both countries had bled in more than any others?

When the Trump administration in 2017 decided to categorise China as an adversary instead of a competitor, it might have known it would be creating conditions for China-Russia rapport that, up to that time, had been unlikely, given their rivalry in Central Asia and their history of border tensions.

What attracts me to this celebration more than a glimpse of the Russian leader in the viewing stand is the attendance of big delegations from nine countries in South-East Asia including Indonesia, Malaysia and Singapore. Each appears to have reached the pragmatic view that they can deal with China as a great power as they dealt over hundreds of years with Imperial China.

Attending with former prime ministers of New Zealand Helen Clark and John Key provides me another opportunity to share views about how we accommodate a reality none of us has the power to stop anyway: China’s emergence as a great power – and the need to avoid conflict between it and the US.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122158

File: 0779864116cf903⋯.jpg (348.39 KB,1920x1080,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23542719 (030552ZSEP25) Notable: Taiwan slams China military parade attended by ex-premiers Carr, Andrews - Taiwan has accused Beijing of using a military parade, attended by former Australian premiers Bob Carr and Daniel Andrews, to push “a deliberate distortion of wartime history” and undermine the island’s sovereignty. The Taipei Economic and Cultural Office in Australia said the event was “a clear attempt to advance (China’s) contemporary territorial claims over Taiwan,” stressing the People’s Republic of China “has never governed Taiwan.” Carr defended his attendance as marking shared WWII history, while Andrews remained silent. Foreign policy experts warned both risk serving as “organs of the Chinese propaganda machine.”

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122156

>>122157

Taiwan slams China military parade attended by ex-premiers Carr, Andrews

JAMES DOWLING - September 01, 2025

1/2

Taiwanese diplomats have branded a Chinese military parade spruiking the attendance of former Australian premiers Bob Carr and Daniel Andrews a “deliberate distortion of wartime history” used to erode the self-governing island’s sovereignty.

Taiwan’s top envoys to Australia said while they “fully respect” individuals who choose to attend the Victory Day commemoration in Beijing, the event was a “clear attempt to advance (China’s) contemporary territorial claims over Taiwan”.

The warning comes after Chinese Assistant Foreign Minister Hong Lei announced the former Victorian and NSW premiers would be attending a parade on Wednesday commemorating 80 years since the end of China’s war with Japan, where President Xi Jinping will appear beside North Korean dictator Kim Jong-un, Russian President Vladimir Putin and Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian.

The news split China hawks and doves inside the Labor Party, as the Albanese government recovers from the souring of relations under the Morrison government while advocating against brazen human rights offences and territorial agitation by the eastern superpower.

“(The) Taipei Economic and Cultural Office in Australia takes note of the attendance of former Victorian premier Dan Andrews and former NSW premier Bob Carr in Beijing,” a spokesperson for Taiwan’s diplomatic delegation said. “We fully respect the decisions taken by individuals. However, we must point out Beijing’s deliberate distortion of wartime history in an attempt to advance its contemporary territorial claims over Taiwan.

“Beijing’s narrative deliberately ignores that Taiwan was placed under the administration of the Republic of China in 1945, four years before the People’s Republic of China even existed. The PRC has never governed Taiwan.

“Taiwan today is home to 23 million people who have built a vibrant democracy of their own. That reality cannot be erased by distorted historical narratives.”

Foreign policy experts have warned Mr Andrews, who has stayed silent on his attendance, and Mr Carr, who confirmed his travel plans, that they risk becoming “organs of the Chinese propaganda machine”.

Leaders from 26 countries will attend the military parade, but Western leaders are conspicuously absent, with China instead leaning towards the global south after securing its largest-ever global engagement with the Shanghai Co-operation Organisation summit this week.

Mr Andrews faced widespread scrutiny over his decision to sign Victoria up to China’s Belt and Road Initiative, before it was vetoed by the Morrison government.

Mr Carr told The Australian on Friday he was attending the event in order to mark China and Australia’s shared military history during World War II. Mr Carr led the Australia-China Relations Institute from 2014-19 and will address the Chinese Institute of International Relations while in Beijing.

The Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade was not consulted on the attendance plans of Australians outside government. It will have a small delegation at Wednesday’s event.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122159

File: 8ec9c052984ec94⋯.jpg (478.27 KB,3000x1922,1500:961,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23542738 (030602ZSEP25) Notable: Opinion: Why are Carr and Andrews legitimising China’s axis of authoritarianism? - "In its typically authoritarian way, China… is commemorating the 80th anniversary of World War II’s end with a big military parade… Xi is basking in the moment. Why then are former Victorian Labor Premier Daniel Andrews and former NSW Premier and federal Foreign Minister Bob Carr joining the festivities?… Legitimising the Communist view of World War II strengthens Xi Jinping’s regime internationally and with China’s own population. Domestically, it enhances Xi’s ability to stifle internal dissent… Most importantly of all, China is concentrating on projecting its future leading international role through this celebration… This century’s main threat to America and its partners is the rapidly emerging axis between China and Russia, and their associated outriders like North Korea, Iran, and Belarus… Andrews and Carr should reconsider their decisions to attend." - John Bolton, Australian Financial Review

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122156

>>122157

>>122158

Opinion: Why are Carr and Andrews legitimising China’s axis of authoritarianism?

The entire event is intended to rewrite history and advance and normalise both the Chinese Communist Party’s official history and to presage the future.

John Bolton - Sep 1, 2025

1/2

In its typically authoritarian way, China (or, more accurately, its Communist Party) is commemorating the 80th anniversary of World War II’s end with a big military parade on September 3. The whole gang will be there to celebrate with Xi Jinping; Vladimir Putin and Kim Jung Un lead the guest list, but most Western nations will send only low-level representatives from their embassies. Nonetheless, Xi is basking in the moment.

Why then are former Victorian Labor Premier Daniel Andrews and former NSW Premier and federal Foreign Minister Bob Carr joining the festivities? Perhaps more importantly, are they travelling at the behest of the Albanese government, or with at least its tacit blessing?

More broadly, how should free countries and citizens respond to the propaganda exercises that authoritarian states regularly stage? We have seen enough such exercises over the past century to understand that more is at stake here than just watching a parade.

Remarkably, Carr justifies his travel to Beijing by asking, “Why shouldn’t I go and talk to two think tanks and talk up the commitment of the Australian government to the relationship, and to quote the prime minister himself?” Fair enough, but why not go on any of the year’s other 365 days to do exactly the same thing?

Andrews signed up Victoria for China’s Belt-and-Road Initiative in 2019, a decision later reversed by then-Prime Minister Scott Morrison. Belt-and-Road is central to Beijing’s ongoing “debt diplomacy” strategy, initially intended to snare unsuspecting Third World countries into apparently attractive financial terms for, say, infrastructure projects, but ultimately serving to strengthen Beijing’s grip on recipient-country economies and governments.

History wars point to China’s future

China’s real political objectives here certainly involve marking Japan’s 1945 defeat, but even that goal embodies a heavily slanted view of what actually led to victory. Scholars and political leaders have widely diverging views on how the respective Chinese combatants actually waged their side of the Sino-Japanese war, which effectively started World War II in the Pacific region. We can be sure that this week’s events will attribute China’s share of victory to Mao Tse-tung and the Communist Party, essentially ignoring the role played by China’s legitimate government under Chiang Kai-shek.

I acknowledge that this is a much-debated issue, but the weight of history suggests that Chiang’s Nationalist forces, inept and corrupt as they may have been, bore the brunt of main-force fighting – and the attendant casualties and destruction – against Japan. Communist efforts, by contrast, were largely guerilla actions against the Japanese, as often as not aimed at enhancing Communist efforts in the civil war with the Nationalists, after defeating Japan.

Legitimising the Communist view of World War II strengthens Xi Jinping’s regime internationally and with China’s own population. Domestically, it enhances Xi’s ability to stifle internal dissent not just about history, but also about current policy issues. We currently see a lot of rewriting of history underway, some of it in democracies, but that is no warrant to legitimise what Beijing has attempted to do with this and prior commemorations involving World War II, and much more.

Most importantly of all, China is concentrating on projecting its future leading international role through this celebration. It is no mistake that Beijing’s official list of attending heads of state, no honour roll of democracies, begins with Putin and Kim. This century’s main threat to America and its partners is the rapidly emerging axis between China and Russia, and their associated outriders like North Korea, Iran, and Belarus. It is no surprise, therefore, that the leaders of Iran and Belarus will also be attending.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122160

File: 33a167aadcd0046⋯.jpg (194.02 KB,800x1200,2:3,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 2d726b42637fa26⋯.jpg (252.48 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 7d7fb5906bb14e2⋯.jpg (424.12 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23542771 (030627ZSEP25) Notable: Australian ambassador to China to miss Xi Jinping military parade - Australia’s ambassador to China, Scott Dewar, will deliberately skip Xi Jinping’s massive military parade in Beijing, instead speaking in Guangzhou, in what officials called a “very conscious calibration.” Canberra is downgrading its representation to defence and political staff, signalling unease with the People’s Liberation Army’s displays of power and Xi’s use of World War II history to justify global ambitions. Russian President Vladimir Putin, Kim Jong-un and Iran’s Masoud Pezeshkian will attend, alongside ex-premiers Bob Carr and Daniel Andrews, who critics warn have inserted themselves into a propaganda exercise.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122156

>>122157

>>122158

Australian ambassador to China to miss Xi Jinping military parade

WILL GLASGOW - 2 September 2025

1/3

Australia’s ambassador to China, Scott Dewar, will be more than 2000km away from Xi ­Jinping’s huge military parade in Beijing on Wednesday in a ­pointed diplo­matic snub by the ­Albanese ­government that underscores Canberra’s deep concerns about the increasingly assertive behaviour of the People’s Liberation Army.

On Wednesday morning, the Chinese President will give a speech in the heart of Beijing, using China’s World War II history to cast his rising power as the champion of a new global order that is displacing America’s global leadership.

More than 10,000 troops, hundreds of pieces of ground equipment and more than 100 PLA Airforce jets are scheduled to appear in the 70-minute military parade.

Russian President Vladimir Putin – Mr Xi’s closest partner on the international stage, whom he met with again on Tuesday – will again be at Beijing’s Gate of Heavenly Peace as a guest of honour as the Chinese leader tells the assembled leaders, many of them dictators, to cherish peace.

A decade ago, Australia was represented at the same event by minister for veteran affairs ­Michael Ronaldson. This time Australia will be officially represented well below ambassadorial level by the defence attache and political counsellor at the Australian embassy in Beijing.

“There’s no way we would send a government representative to join Putin. It’s a very conscious calibration,” said a source involved in the government’s decision to demote Australia’s representation. “It’s deliberate,” another government source told The ­Australian.

To underline the point, Australia’s ambassador, Mr Dewar, on Wednesday morning will be ­almost as far away from Beijing as you can go without leaving China’s borders, addressing the Australian business community in the southern city of Guangzhou.

“This unique event will provide valuable insights into Australia-China relations,” promises AustCham China, the main Australian business lobby in the country, which has organised the meeting.

Among those toasting China’s brave new world in a hybrid event that will mark the defeat of ­Imperial Japan in World War II, as well as unveiling Mr Xi’s latest war-fighting kit will be Putin, North Korea’s dynastic dictator Kim Jung-un, Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian and Myanmar’s junta leader, Min Aung ­Hlaing.

Beijing’s propagandists have insisted the display of China’s increasingly potent military capabilities – new hypersonic missiles, new tanks, new stealth fighters – will be a manifestation of the world’s increasingly peaceful ­future. Two former Labor state leaders, Bob Carr and Dan Andrews, each Labor Party cult figures with their own personal China agendas, have muddied the Albanese government’s message.

Sources in the Albanese government have stressed that they are in Beijing in a “personal capacity” and that they have not co-ordinated with Australian officials.

“It’s unfortunate,” said a former senior Australian diplomat, noting Mr Carr and Mr Andrews have dealt themselves into what is “ultimately a propaganda exercise”.

“There are useful idiots in our system,” another former senior Australian official said.

China’s government is delighted to have the “former statesmen” along.

Some in Washington are wondering if the two Labor figures are attending with the tacit support of Canberra.

‘Xi hit the nail on the head’

Ahead of the parade, Mr Xi has fashioned himself into what the China-focused Indian analyst Manoj Kewalramani has dubbed “China’s story-teller-in-chief.

The main thrust of Mr Xi’s narrative is that China’s World War II experience – the “great victory of the Chinese People’s War of Resistance Against Japanese Aggression”, in Communist Party speak – marked a “historic turning point for the Chinese nation”, as the People’s Daily recently declared.

The victory allowed China “to transition from the deep crisis it had fallen into since modern times toward great rejuvenation,” the party’s flagship daily continued.

It is, in the words of the British historian Rana Mitter, “China’s good war”, a rare occasion in the country’s bloody 20th century when Chinese soldiers were fighting a foreign invader rather than other Chinese soldiers, or the Chinese population itself.

Mr Xi, a better Leninist than historian, distils an instructive political message from the war.

“The Communist Party of China’s role as the mainstay was the key to the Chinese people’s victory in the War of Resistance Against Japan,” Mr Xi has said.

“General Secretary Xi Jinping hit the nail on the head,” the People’s Daily declared.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122161

File: bd471be68a1f877⋯.jpg (225.76 KB,1920x1080,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 1a2f8965a6fe1a6⋯.jpg (155.98 KB,1973x1110,1973:1110,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23542782 (030640ZSEP25) Notable: COMMENTARY: China’s WWII victory parade is a supreme fiction - "This week the Chinese Communist Party will orchestrate a grand military parade in Tiananmen Square… Ostensibly a tribute to wartime heroism, this display is, in truth, a monumental distortion of history… At the heart of this charade lies the falsehood that the CCP was the principal fighting force against Japanese aggression during the war. This claim is a brazen lie. It was the Nationalist government, under Chiang Kai-shek, that bore the brunt of Japan’s assault… Mao focused not on liberation or resistance but on quietly building his army… Today’s CCP regime continues to weaponise historical memory… The entire upcoming parade is a political theatre, a state-forged spectacle masquerading as remembrance… To attend this spectacle is to legitimise a fraud… What will unfold on September 3 is not remembrance but propaganda — an insult draped in flags and uniforms, parading not history but deception." - Miles Yu, director of the China Centre at the Hudson Institute, The Australian

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122156

>>122157

>>122158

COMMENTARY: China’s WWII victory parade is a supreme fiction

MILES YU - September 02, 2025

1/2

This week the Chinese Communist Party will orchestrate a grand military parade in Tiananmen Square to commemorate victory over Japan in World War II.

Ostensibly a tribute to wartime heroism, this display is, in truth, a monumental distortion of history, a calculated fiction meant to glorify the party, vilify its contemporary adversaries and mislead its people.

At the heart of this charade lies the falsehood that the CCP was the principal fighting force against Japanese aggression during the war. This claim is a brazen lie.

From 1937 to 1945, it was the Nationalist government, under Chiang Kai-shek, that bore the brunt of Japan’s military assault. Nationalist forces, not the Chinese communists, fought nearly every major battle and sustained more than 3.5 million military casualties. In stark contrast, the CCP, holed up in its Yan’an stronghold, sustained minuscule losses. Only one high-ranking communist officer, Zuo Quan, is confirmed to have died in a skirmish with the Japanese.

Japanese casualty data confirms the truth: Of the estimated one million-plus Japanese casualties in China, virtually all fell to Nationalist or Allied hands, not the communists.

The main cause of the CCP’s inaction against the Japanese invading forces is its ideological symbiosis with the Soviet Union, which prohibited the CCP from actively fighting Japan during World War II.

In late August 1939, Josef Stalin signed a non-aggression pact with Adolf Hitler, whose ally in Asia was Japan, and despite the Nazis’ subsequent betrayal of the pact, the Soviets remained vigilant against any Allied efforts using their territory, resources or affiliated forces to fight Japan in Asia.

This was because of the notorious April 1941 Soviet-Japanese Neutrality Pact, which Moscow strictly enforced until the very last days of the war.

As such, the Soviets and their CCP clients were effectively bound to a policy of non-confrontation against the Japanese in China during most of the war. Any military action by the CCP would have jeopardised the USSR’s neutrality pact with Tokyo, and thus Mao Zedong and the CCP carefully avoided real conflict with the Japanese. As a result, the Japanese military and the CCP forces virtually coexisted in the same large swathes of Japanese-occupied North China, where there was little to no communist resistance.

Mao focused not on liberation or resistance but on quietly building his army from a few thousand to more than one million troops by war’s end, all without serious engagement but with the goal of defeating the legitimate, US-supported Chinese Nationalist government in the post-war era.

Even when American efforts, via the Office of Strategic Services, sought to arm and train guerrilla resistance in communist-held zones, the CCP obstructed operations. The brutal killing of Office of Strategic Services agent Captain John Birch stands as a grim testament to the CCP’s duplicity and hostility toward genuine anti-Japanese resistance that threatened its ambitions.

The party’s rare foray into combat, ie, the much-touted “Hundred Regiments Offensive” of 1940, was neither decisive nor heroic. To fake its anti-Japanese feat, the CCP claimed massive Japanese casualties because of this campaign, as many as 46,000, but Japan’s casualty records suggest the real number was less than 500. Mao later even denounced the operation as a strategic blunder, and its commander, Peng Dehuai, was purged for, among other things, violating Mao’s preference for strategic concealment in 1940.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122162

File: 835566a58164e96⋯.mp4 (9.46 MB,960x540,16:9,Clipboard.mp4)

File: b2262ea8b43782a⋯.jpg (253.9 KB,1600x900,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: d143f5b0b646a36⋯.jpg (184.07 KB,1600x900,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23542802 (030707ZSEP25) Notable: Extraordinary engagement:Former Victorian premier Daniel Andrews meets with Xi Jinping- (Video) Former Victorian premier Daniel Andrews has met Chinese President Xi Jinping ahead of Beijing’s grand military parade marking 80 years since the end of World War II. Andrews, joined by former NSW premier Bob Carr, was among the 10,000-strong crowd in Tiananmen Square. The event, showcasing China’s newest hypersonic missiles, tanks and stealth fighters, featured Russian President Vladimir Putin, North Korea’s Kim Jong-un and other authoritarian leaders. Analyst Neil Thomas said the attendance of Carr and Andrews would likely bolster Beijing’s narrative that China was the decisive force against Japan, calling the line-up a “rogues’ gallery”.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122156

>>122157

>>122161

Former Victorian premier Daniel Andrews meets with Xi Jinping

Emily Bennett and Richard Wood - Sep 3, 2025

Former Victorian premier Daniel Andrews has been seen shaking hands with Chinese President Xi Jinping prior to the nation's grand military parade.The parade, which boasts other guests including Russian President Vladimir Putin and North Korean dictator Kim Jong-Un, marks the 80th anniversary of the end of World War II.

Andrews was accompanied by former NSW premier and foreign minister Bob Carr.

The two are reported to be among the 10,000 strong crowd watching the event in Beijing's Tiananmen Square.

The former politicians, who have a record of forging links with China, are attending in a personal capacity.

The parade will showcase China's newest warfighting kit, including hypersonic missiles, tanks, stealth fighters in a display of the communist ruled nation's military arsenal.

Analyst Neil Thomas, from the Asia Society Policy Institute think tank, told Today this morning the parade had drawn a "rogues' gallery" of authoritarian world leaders, including North Korean dictator Kim Jong-Un and Russian President Vladimir Putin.

He said the attendance of Carr and Daniels would likely bolster the Chinese government's efforts to promote the event, and its claims China was the major force behind Japan's defeat in World War II.

"They're (Carr and Daniels) not representing Australia, although, of course, they did hold senior roles in state governments before.

"So it's certainly the case that China is looking to use their participation to bolster the international reach and legitimacy of this parade."

In addition to the North Korean and Russian dictators, the leaders of hardline regimes such as Iran and Belarus will also be watching the parade.

"The fact that the company you have at this parade is a rogues gallery of international leaders like Vladimir Putin and Kim Jong-Un, it certainly doesn't leave a good taste in your mouth," Thomas said.

The federal government confirmed senior Australian officials will not be attending.

https://www.9news.com.au/world/chinese-militiary-parade-tiananmen-gate-in-beijing-2025-in-pictures/671b744c-4d4e-491f-8b33-62f056495362

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122163

File: b883556720ba2c0⋯.mp4 (2.5 MB,960x540,16:9,Clipboard.mp4)

File: 73ee72dbde4c625⋯.jpg (1.9 MB,8256x5504,3:2,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23542811 (030715ZSEP25) Notable: Video: Dan Andrews shakes Xi's hand at Beijing parade - Former Victorian premier Daniel Andrews shook hands with Chinese President Xi Jinping and First Lady Peng Liyuan before Beijing’s vast military parade in Tiananmen Square. Andrews later appeared in an official group photograph alongside Russian President Vladimir Putin and North Korean dictator Kim Jong-un. Andrews, attending in a “personal capacity,” has complicated Canberra’s diplomatic stance as the Albanese government distances itself from the event. The parade also drew Iran’s President Masoud Pezeshkian and Myanmar’s junta leader Min Aung Hlaing, while Australia’s ambassador Scott Dewar stayed away, signalling a deliberate diplomatic snub of Xi’s display of military power.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122156

>>122157

>>122161

>>122162

Dan Andrews shakes Xi's hand at Beijing parade

Will Glasgow - Sep 03, 2025

Former Labor premier Daniel Andrews has joined world leaders and dictators on the red carpet ahead of the military parade in Tiananmen Square in Beijing.

Mr Andrews shook Mr Xi’s hand, then that of Mr Xi’s wife Peng Liyuan, shortly before the commemorations began.

Andrews later appeared prominently in a group photograph that featured world leaders, which included Russian President Vladimir Putin and North Korea’s dynastic dictator Kim Jong-un.

Andrews, a Labor Party cult figure with his own personal China agenda, has muddied the Albanese government’s diplomatic message by attending in a “personal capacity”.

Also among those joining Xi, Putin and Jong-un to admire China’s military hardware will be Iranian president Masoud Pezeshkian and Myanmar’s junta leader Min Aung Hlaing.

Australia’s Ambassador to China Scott Dewar will be more than 2000 km away from Xi’s parade in a pointed diplomatic snub by the Albanese government that underscores Canberra’s deep concerns about the increasingly assertive behaviour of the People’s Liberation Army.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/world/xi-showcases-militarys-potent-new-weaponry-in-show-of-extravaganza/live-coverage/5bae30bc5ef7c6383b68e8dce9edf6b2#/entry/12911259

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122164

File: d32ac07cbbb9c92⋯.mp4 (792.08 KB,1024x768,4:3,Clipboard.mp4)

File: b5c8f38fef86322⋯.jpg (244.25 KB,1920x1080,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 9b60cb0a8bf6734⋯.jpg (4.09 MB,7582x5055,7582:5055,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23542833 (030730ZSEP25) Notable: Video: Dan Andrews poses alongside Xi, Putin and Kim Jong-un - Former Victorian premier Daniel Andrews appeared in an official group photo with Chinese President Xi Jinping, Russian President Vladimir Putin and North Korea’s Kim Jong-un at Beijing’s World War II anniversary parade. While former NSW premier Bob Carr declined to attend, calling the event “Soviet-style,” Andrews was the only Australian politician present, a move condemned by Coalition MPs as making him a “pawn” of the Chinese regime. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese noted Australia had reduced its representation, with no minister or ambassador present. Critics said Andrews’ attendance bolstered Beijing’s propaganda, while Carr instead chose to address two Chinese international relations think tanks.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122156

>>122157

>>122161

>>122162

Dan Andrews poses alongside Xi, Putin and Kim Jong-un

Nick Newling and Paul Sakkal - September 3, 2025

Former Victorian premier Daniel Andrews has posed in a group photo with North Korean dictator Kim Jong-un and Russian President Vladimir Putin before a parade in Beijing to commemorate the end of World War II, after shaking hands with China’s leader Xi Jinping on the ceremony’s red carpet.

Held to mark 80 years since Japan surrendered, the parade featured a show of military strength that former NSW premier Bob Carr, who is in China for the broader commemorations, decided to skip and called “Soviet-style”.

Both Andrews and Carr came under heavy scrutiny for their planned attendance from both sides of the Australian political spectrum and were described as “pawns” of the Chinese regime by Coalition MPs.

Andrews stood in the back row of an official image of the event that included numerous country leaders, just metres behind Kim.

Carr was previously believed to be attending the event, but told this masthead he would attend separate indoor events following the parade, and address two Chinese international relations think tanks instead.

“I told the Chinese I wouldn’t be attending the parade but that I’d like to accelerate arrangements to talk to think tanks,” Carr said from China.

“I had to make a decision on whether I was attracted to a traditional Soviet-style military parade or if I wanted to opt for the meetings with delegations, a unique constellation from South-East Asia. I opted for the meetings.”

Carr’s decision meant Andrews, whose Victorian government controversially signed up to China’s Belt and Road agreement, was the only Australian politician invited to the military showcase who was comfortable attending. An official from the Australian embassy is attending other events related to the commemoration.

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese was twice asked about Andrews’ attendance at the parade during question time on Wednesday.

“The Australian government did have a representative there,” Albanese said. “The Australian government did have a representative 10 years ago [at the 70th anniversary celebrations]. That was a minister in the [Coalition] government. Our government chose that [sending a minister] would not be the case.”

Former Queensland premier Annastacia Palaszczuk said Carr and Andrews’ attendance at the commemoration events was a mistake, before Carr declared he would not be going to the parade. “If it were me, it’d be a definite N-O,” Palaszczuk told Sky News on Wednesday.

“I respect Dan, I respect Bob. But I think they’ve just gone the next level. Go there for a holiday, do your business talks, but there’s no need to attend this military parade.”

Both opposition home affairs spokesman Andrew Hastie and Nationals leader David Littleproud described the pair as “pawns” of the Chinese regime.

“They’re being used by the Chinese regime because they have influence with the Albanese government,” Littleproud said on Sky. “That’s why they’re invited. They’re going because of their own egos. The reality is this is a military parade, where not even the Australian ambassador will be representing Australia there, won’t even be in the city to be near this military parade.“

The photo is set to catapult Andrews’ business clout in China, where portraits of Xi Jinping are ubiquitous.

Andrews spent $416,000 of taxpayers’ funding on six trips to China as premier - more than he spent visiting any other country - before and after Victoria signed on to Beijing’s $1.5 trillion Belt and Road infrastructure initiative in 2019.

The state government’s disclosure logs reveal he witnessed deals between Chemist Warehouse and Alibaba, helped secure a $130 million partnership between medical technology specialist Compumedics and Chinese medical provider Health 100, lobbied for direct daily flights from Beijing and Sichuan to Melbourne, and the extension of a sponsorship deal between the Australian Open and Chinese liquor giant Luzhou Laojiao.

In early 2024, after resigning as premier, he registered two companies, Glencairn Street and Wedgetail Partners, the latter of which he runs with his former multicultural adviser, Marty Mei. Mei, who solicited political donations from the Chinese community, travelled on each trip to China with Andrews as premier.

Glencairn Street and Wedgetail Partners, which reportedly specialise in foreign investment, have no website or contact details. Andrews and Mei did not respond to requests for comment.

Andrews was contacted for comment.

https://www.theage.com.au/politics/federal/dan-andrews-poses-alongside-xi-putin-and-kim-jong-un-20250903-p5ms37.html

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/world/xi-showcases-militarys-potent-new-weaponry-in-show-of-extravaganza/live-coverage/5bae30bc5ef7c6383b68e8dce9edf6b2#/entry/12911259

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122165

File: 7bbc6b0cbb14990⋯.jpg (634.22 KB,750x1289,750:1289,Clipboard.jpg)

File: b3827300b6e72ca⋯.jpg (546.86 KB,1536x2048,3:4,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 03a057ff0f53cfa⋯.jpg (2.6 MB,7057x4705,7057:4705,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23542853 (030742ZSEP25) Notable: Carr skips military parade, as Andrews joins Xi on red carpet - Former NSW premier Bob Carr declined to attend Beijing’s “Soviet-style” military parade, instead choosing to address two Chinese international relations think tanks and join separate indoor commemorations. Carr said he opted for “meetings with delegations” over the parade, which featured Xi Jinping, Russian President Vladimir Putin and North Korea’s Kim Jong-un. His decision left former Victorian premier Daniel Andrews as the only Australian politician present, after controversially signing Victoria up to China’s Belt and Road agreement. Opposition home affairs spokesman Andrew Hastie labelled Andrews a “nice little pawn” of China’s propaganda effort.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122156

>>122157

>>122161

>>122162

Carr skips military parade, as Andrews joins Xi on red carpet

Paul Sakkal - 3 September 2025

Bob Carr says he elected not to attend the “Soviet-style” military parade at which former Victorian premier Daniel Andrews shook the hand of Chinese President Xi Jinping and stood in a leaders’ photograph behind North Korean dictator Kim Jong-un.

Carr was previously believed to have been attending the parade as one of only two Australians on the guest list. He wrote an opinion piece this week explaining why he accepted an invitation to Beijing. But he confirmed to this masthead minutes ago that he was not at the parade attended by Russian President Vladimir Putin and other pro-China leaders.

Carr is attending separate indoor events later in the day to mark the 80th anniversary of China’s role in World War II. He is also addressing two Chinese international relations think tanks.

“I told the Chinese I wouldn’t be attending the parade but that I’d like to accelerate arrangements to talk to think-tanks,” Carr said from China.

“I had to make a decision on whether I was attracted to a traditional Soviet-style military parade or if I wanted to opt for the meetings with delegations, a unique constellation from South East Asia. I opted for the meetings.”

Carr’s decision meant Andrews, whose Victorian government controversially signed up to China’s Belt and Road Infrastructure agreement, was the only Australian politician attending the military showcase.

Opposition home affairs spokesman Andrew Hastie labelled Andrews a “nice little pawn” of China’s.

https://www.theage.com.au/world/asia/china-military-parade-live-updates-victory-day-parade-begins-in-beijing-as-xi-jinping-flanked-by-putin-kim-jong-un-on-arrival-former-victorian-premier-daniel-andrews-in-attendance-20250903-p5ms0i.html?post=p5971a#p5971a

https://x.com/bobjcarr/status/1963067026697810220

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122166

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23542869 (030749ZSEP25) Notable: Video: Xi Jinping greets former Victorian Premier at start of China military parade - Former Victorian Premier Daniel Andrews has been personally greeted by China's Xi Jinping at the start of a massive military parade in China. - 9 News Australia

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122156

>>122157

>>122161

>>122162

Xi Jinping greets former Victorian Premier at start of China military parade

9 News Australia

Sep 3, 2025

Former Victorian Premier Daniel Andrews has been personally greeted by China's Xi Jinping at the start of a massive military parade in China.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BnfjgND6MIg

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122167

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23542877 (030753ZSEP25) Notable: Dan Andrews joins world leaders at China military parade - China stages a massive military parade in Beijing to commemorate the anniversary of the end of World War II, featuring 10,000 soldiers and modern military equipment including stealth bombers and new tanks. Former Victorian Premier Dan Andrews and ex-NSW Premier Bob Carr attend alongside world leaders including Vladimir Putin and Iran's leader, with Andrews receiving prominent treatment in the ceremony. Chinese President Xi Jinping delivers a speech emphasising China's role in ending WWII and its current military strength. - 7NEWS Australia

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122156

>>122157

>>122161

>>122162

Dan Andrews joins world leaders at China military parade

7NEWS Australia

Sep 3, 2025

China stages a massive military parade in Beijing to commemorate the anniversary of the end of World War II, featuring 10,000 soldiers and modern military equipment including stealth bombers and new tanks. Former Victorian Premier Dan Andrews and ex-NSW Premier Bob Carr attend alongside world leaders including Vladimir Putin and Iran's leader, with Andrews receiving prominent treatment in the ceremony. Chinese President Xi Jinping delivers a speech emphasising China's role in ending WWII and its current military strength.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GIp1S5G1ZKo

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122168

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23542904 (030829ZSEP25) Notable: High-tech weaponry and China's military might on full display - China's military might was on full display at a Victory Parade hosted by Xi Jinping in Beijing. Hypersonic weapons, underwater drones, and ballistic missiles were rolled out to a crowd that included Russian President Vladimir Putin and North Korea's Kim Jong-Un. Former China correspondent Nicole Johnston says China is sending a clear message to the West about its position in the world and its desire to create a system of global governments that is not centred on the United States. - ABC News (Australia)

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122156

>>122157

>>122161

>>122162

High-tech weaponry and China's military might on full display

ABC News (Australia)

Sep 3, 2025

China's military might was on full display at a Victory Parade hosted by Xi Jinping in Beijing. Hypersonic weapons, underwater drones, and ballistic missiles were rolled out to a crowd that included Russian President Vladimir Putin and North Korea's Kim Jong-Un. Former China correspondent Nicole Johnston says China is sending a clear message to the West about its position in the world and its desire to create a system of global governments that is not centred on the United States.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MSre55Y3j5Q

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-09-03/china-hosts-lavish-military-parade/105728210

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122169

File: da67f33d74b68c3⋯.jpg (405.45 KB,814x582,407:291,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23542914 (030835ZSEP25) Notable: Donald J. Trump Truth - "The big question to be answered is whether or not President Xi of China will mention the massive amount of support and “blood” that The United States of America gave to China in order to help it to secure its FREEDOM from a very unfriendly foreign invader. Many Americans died in China’s quest for Victory and Glory. I hope that they are rightfully Honored and Remembered for their Bravery and Sacrifice! May President Xi and the wonderful people of China have a great and lasting day of celebration. Please give my warmest regards to Vladimir Putin, and Kim Jong Un, as you conspire against The United States of America. PRESIDENT DONALD J. TRUMP"''''

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122156

>>122161

>>122162

>>122168

Donald J. Trump Truth

The big question to be answered is whether or not President Xi of China will mention the massive amount of support and “blood” that The United States of America gave to China in order to help it to secure its FREEDOM from a very unfriendly foreign invader. Many Americans died in China’s quest for Victory and Glory. I hope that they are rightfully Honored and Remembered for their Bravery and Sacrifice! May President Xi and the wonderful people of China have a great and lasting day of celebration. Please give my warmest regards to Vladimir Putin, and Kim Jong Un, as you conspire against The United States of America. PRESIDENT DONALD J. TRUMP

https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/115137717177283585

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122170

File: 9b60cb0a8bf6734⋯.jpg (4.09 MB,7582x5055,7582:5055,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23546765 (041029ZSEP25) Notable: Video: No security briefing before Andrews’ Beijing trip where he posed alongside Putin, Kim Jong-un - Former Victorian premier Daniel Andrews did not seek advice from the federal government or DFAT before attending Beijing’s military parade, where he shook Xi Jinping’s hand and appeared in an official photo with Vladimir Putin, Kim Jong-un and other authoritarian leaders. His attendance, condemned by former Queensland premier Annastacia Palaszczuk and labelled a propaganda coup by critics, shocked ministers in Canberra. Bob Carr skipped the “Soviet-style” parade, opting to speak at two Chinese international relations think tanks. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese stressed Andrews was not representing Australia, as the government deliberately kept its diplomatic presence low, represented by the embassy’s defence attache.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122156

>>122157

>>122161

>>122162

No security briefing before Andrews’ Beijing trip where he posed alongside Putin, Kim Jong-un

Paul Sakkal - September 3, 2025

1/2

Former Victorian premier Daniel Andrews did not seek diplomatic advice before attending China’s anti-Western show of military might in Beijing, according to official sources, where he posed for a photo metres from dictators Kim Jong-un and Vladimir Putin.

In a move that stunned many in the federal government, Andrews shook President Xi Jinping’s hand on the red carpet in Tiananmen Square, before posing for a “family photo” near leaders that also included the Iranian president and Myanmar’s junta leader.

Official sources not authorised to speak on the record said Andrews did not ask the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade or anyone else in the government for advice on personal security or how to protect Australia’s national interest when talking to Chinese officials.

Andrews’ attendance at the ceremony, which marked 80 years since Japan’s surrender at the end of World War II, was condemned by former Queensland Labor premier Annastacia Palaszczuk as a step too far, and his appearance in the group photo with dictators and leaders of rogue states shocked Albanese government ministers.

Former NSW premier Bob Carr, who also travelled to China for the event, chose to skip the military parade due to what he called its “Soviet-style” aesthetic.

Andrews was contacted for comment but has not made any public remarks since it was revealed last Friday that he would attend the parade, which Chinese propaganda has cast as a victory for China rather than Western allies.

Albanese declined to endorse or condemn Andrews’ presence in Beijing, saying only that the former premier was “not meeting them” when asked if Andrews should be at an event with Putin or Kim, both of whom have been condemned by Australia and on the world stage for their disregard of the international rule of law.

Australia sent the embassy’s defence attache to some of the ceremonies, but Andrews was the only Australian dignitary at the parade.

Labor has sought to strike a balance with China, softening its tone to boost trade at the same time as procuring AUKUS nuclear submarines to deter the Asian superpower that seeks to dominate the Indo-Pacific.

Albanese travelled to China to meet Xi in July and spruiked warmer ties, but the government did not want to be anywhere near the parade where Xi hosted Putin and Kim and a raft of other anti-Western national leaders.

Andrews, a long-time ally of Albanese from the same Left faction, advised the prime minister on debate tactics before the last election, and the pair caught up for lunch at Melbourne’s Gimlet restaurant in June.

Questions about Andrews’ trip to Beijing plagued debate in Canberra on Wednesday. Albanese was twice asked about Andrews’ attendance at the parade during question time on Wednesday.

“The Australian government did have a representative there,” Albanese said. “The Australian government did have a representative 10 years ago [at the 70th anniversary celebrations]. That was a minister in the [Coalition] government. Our government chose that [sending a minister] would not be the case.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122171

File: 47512bcae60f001⋯.jpg (294.17 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: b7a7c3c15bc8457⋯.jpg (895.37 KB,1158x1411,1158:1411,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23546788 (041049ZSEP25) Notable: Labor figures - but not PM - slam ‘traitor’ Dan Andrews’ China propaganda appearance - Daniel Andrews’ handshake with Xi Jinping and presence on a parade podium near Kim Jong-un and Vladimir Putin has ignited anger within Labor. Former federal MP Michael Danby, who once chaired parliament’s foreign affairs and defence committee, called the image of Andrews with Xi “disgusting” and “an embarrassment to all Australians,” noting that Andrews and Bob Carr had “never a word for the poor Uighur Muslim people, and never a word for the poor Tibetans.” Quoting Shakespeare, Danby declared: “Shame, shame, eternal shame.” Andrews did not consult DFAT and kept Albanese, his former flatmate, uninformed of his plans. The Prime Minister sidestepped questions, noting a Coalition minister had attended the previous anniversary 10 years ago, as critics warned Andrews’ actions embarrassed Labor and aided Chinese messaging.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122156

>>122157

>>122161

>>122162

Labor figures – but not PM – slam ‘traitor’ Dan Andrews’ China propaganda appearance

BEN PACKHAM and NOAH YIM - September 03, 2025

1/2

Daniel Andrews has ignited fury inside Labor for his decision to rub shoulders with the world’s most notorious dictators, but Anthony Albanese has refused to criticise his former Canberra flatmate for attending Xi Jinping’s military parade.

One federal Labor MP branded the former Victorian premier a “traitor” after he was greeted with a handshake by the Chinese President and placed just three rows behind North Korean dictator Kim Jong-un on a VIP podium to watch China’s ostentatious display of military might.

Prominent Labor figures, including former Queensland premier Annastacia Palaszczuk and former Victorian federal MP Michael Danby, slammed Mr Andrews for taking part in the spectacle, also attended by Russia’s Vladimir Putin and Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian.

Mr Andrews, who has a Chinese-focused business with a Mandarin-speaking former adviser, did not consult the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade on his decision to attend the parade, while the Prime Minister was unaware he would do so, sources said.

Former foreign minister Bob Carr was also set to attend the parade commemorating the 80th anniversary of Japan’s surrender in World War II but pulled out at the last minute.

Australia’s ambassador to Beijing, Scott Dewar, snubbed the parade, leaving a mid-ranking diplomat and Australia’s military attache in Beijing to represent the government.

Mr Albanese was asked multiple times in parliament whether he condemned Mr Andrews’ attendance at the event but he sidestepped the questions, pointing to the Abbott government’s decision to send its veterans’ affairs minister, Michael Ronaldson, to the same event 10 years ago.

“I am responsible for the Australian government,” Mr Albanese said. “The Australian government did have a representative there and the Australian government did have a representative 10 years ago that was a minister … our government chose that would not be the case.”

Mr Albanese, who shared a flat with Mr Andrews in Canberra in the 1990s, made a record-length visit to China just six weeks ago, where he had a lengthy meeting with Mr Xi and was treated to a lavish private banquet by his host.

He said he engaged “across the board” with his international counterparts, and despite failing so far to secure a meeting with US President Donald Trump, re­iterated the US was Australia’s “most important partner”.

One Victorian-based federal Labor MP said Mr Andrews was “a traitor” for standing on the podium with murderous dictators. “I am gobsmacked,” the MP said. “He’s up there with Kim Jong-un and Vladimir Putin. It doesn’t help the Labor movement.”

Ms Palaszczuk said Mr Andrews’ attendance was a “bridge too far” and sent “mixed messages” to Australians.

“Go there for a holiday, do your business talks, but there’s no need to attend this military parade,” the former premier told Sky News.

“Trade is one thing, and tourism, but military parades? I would honestly stop and think seriously about that.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122172

File: 9b60cb0a8bf6734⋯.jpg (4.09 MB,7582x5055,7582:5055,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 956d2417f43d404⋯.jpg (444.45 KB,2550x3300,17:22,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23546804 (041101ZSEP25) Notable: Daniel Andrews defends China visit as deputy premier rebukes him for photo with dictators - Deputy Premier Ben Carroll rebuked former premier Daniel Andrews for appearing in a photo with Xi Jinping, Vladimir Putin, Kim Jong-un and Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian, saying it was “not worth it” for business interests and “not something I would have done.” Andrews defended his attendance at Beijing’s parade as an opportunity to meet regional leaders, while stressing his condemnation of Putin’s war in Ukraine and Iran’s attacks. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese distanced himself, saying no minister would have considered going. Ukrainian community leaders urged Andrews to apologise, calling his appearance an “appalling lack of judgment.”

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122156

>>122161

>>122162

>>122171

Daniel Andrews defends China visit as deputy premier rebukes him for photo with dictators

Kieran Rooney and Paul Sakkal - September 4, 2025

1/2

Deputy Premier Ben Carroll has publicly rebuked his former boss, Daniel Andrews, for posing in a photograph alongside dictators and alleged war criminals, saying it wasn’t worth it to further his personal business interests.

Carroll’s comments emerged as Andrews publicly responded to his appearance for the first time, saying the event was a chance to meet with regional leaders, and defended his stance on geopolitical issues such as the war in Ukraine.

Andrews said in a statement on Thursday afternoon that attending the Chinese military parade to celebrate 80 years since the end of World War II “was a chance to meet and engage with regional leaders – like former New Zealand prime ministers John Key and Helen Clark, Malaysian Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim and, of course, Chinese President Xi. We also shared in an official photograph.”

The official photograph features Andrews standing alongside some of the world’s most reviled political leaders, including the leaders of Russia, North Korea and Iran. Australia last week expelled the Iranian ambassador after announcing Iran had orchestrated the firebombing of the Adass Israel synagogue in Melbourne and a deli in Sydney. Russian President Vladimir Putin is being pursued by the International Criminal Court for allegations of war crimes, and the United Nations has said North Korean dictator Kim Jong-un could be guilty of crimes against humanity.

Carroll’s comments contrast with Premier Jacinta Allan’s response to the image. Allan, while not commenting directly on the pictures, said it was a good thing for Victoria that Andrews was well liked in China.

But the deputy premier, when approached by the media outside Treasury Place on Thursday, questioned Andrews’ judgment in appearing at the event.

“Most Victorians will be asking: Is it worth it for self-interested business purposes to be having a photo standing behind Kim Jong-un and Vladimir Putin?” Carroll said.

“I think for the vast majority, myself included, the value judgment [is] it’s not worth that photo, and that’ll be the question that Victorians want answers on.

“It’s not something I would have done.”

In his statement, Andrews defended his decision to attend the Chinese military parade, which was also a display of Chinese military might.

“I’ve said for years that a constructive relationship with China – our largest trading partner – is in Australia’s national interest, and hundreds of thousands of Australian jobs depend on it. That hasn’t changed,” he said.

“And just so there’s no confusion: I have condemned Putin and his illegal war in Ukraine from day one. That’s why he banned me from Russia last year.

“Further, my support of Israel and Australia’s Jewish community has been outspoken and unwavering, and I unequivocally condemn Iran for its attacks on Australia, Israel and elsewhere around the world,” Andrews said.

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese also distanced himself from Andrews’ decision to attend the military parade, saying neither he nor any of his ministers would have considered going.

“My position is very, very clear, which is we did not send any government representative because it would not have been appropriate,” Albanese said during question time in federal parliament.

“None of my people would have sat in that position, as simple as that. It certainly is not something that I would have even thought of doing and no one in my government would have thought of doing.

“What individuals do very separate from the government is a matter for them.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122173

File: f2b7e3d4046b8e3⋯.jpg (595.32 KB,1920x1080,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 5afb3852bc44dd4⋯.jpg (233.95 KB,750x746,375:373,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 20661847b27e15a⋯.mp4 (12.08 MB,960x540,16:9,Clipboard.mp4)

File: cff546ac7534719⋯.jpg (153.04 KB,931x766,931:766,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23546828 (041125ZSEP25) Notable: Video: ‘Filling his pockets’: Resurfaced footage shows former Victorian premier Daniel Andrews praising China ahead of ‘parade of dictators’ - Newly resurfaced March 2025 footage shows Daniel Andrews praising China’s economic growth and renewable energy transition in an interview with state-run CGTN, saying Beijing did not receive the credit it deserved. Weeks later he attended Xi Jinping’s military parade, where he was photographed with Xi, Vladimir Putin and Kim Jong-un. Former Morrison government press secretary Andrew Carswell called Andrews’ presence a “colossal error of judgement” and claimed he would use the photo “to drive business… filling his pockets.” The parade displayed hypersonic missiles and ICBM launchers, while Prime Minister Albanese stressed Andrews was not representing Australia.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122156

>>122161

>>122162

>>122171

‘Filling his pockets’: Resurfaced footage shows former Victorian premier Daniel Andrews praising China ahead of ‘parade of dictators’

Newly resurfaced footage of former Victorian Premier Daniel Andrews has shown him cosying up to the Chinese Communist Party before he attended the “parade of dictators”.

Oscar Godsell - September 4, 2025

Newly resurfaced footage of former Victorian Premier Daniel Andrews has shown him lavishing praise on the Chinese Communist Party ahead of the parade of dictators.

Mr Andrews had sat down for an interview with state-run media just weeks before his attendance at Chinese President Xi Jinping’s military parade.

The former Premier has long faced criticism over his ties with China and secret dealings with the CCP, including Victoria’s short-lived involvement with the Belt and Road Initiative in 2018.

Recent footage, recorded in March 2025, featured Mr Andrews speaking with CGTN, the state-run Chinese news outlet under CCP control.

Mr Andrews praised China in the interview for its focus on productivity and economic growth.

“It's really important to see President Xi, as well as other senior leaders across China so consistently speak about changing the way economic growth occurs,” he said.

“I'm really looking forward to hearing more about how the Chinese government … sees (the renewable energy transition) unfolding in the years to come.”

Mr Andrews described renewable energy as “absolutely the future” and said he does not think China “gets the international credit and acclaim” that he believes it deserves.

He made the remarks despite the fact that between 2014 and 2024, China’s energy emissions rose by 1,970 million tonnes.

The footage was released shortly before Mr Andrews’ high-profile attendance at China’s largest-ever military parade.

The former Premier then was photographed smiling alongside Chinese President Xi Jinping, Russian President Vladimir Putin, and North Korean leader Kim Jong Un.

Former press secretary to the Morrison government Andrew Carswell told Sky News that Mr Andrews' presence in China was a “colossal error of judgement”.

“This is what we've always thought about Dan. We’ve had suspicion that he is self-interested in this area,” Mr Carswell said.

“I wouldn't say he's an ideologue. I wouldn't say he is seeking alignment with the Chinese Communist Party, but he's an opportunist.

“He's going to take that photo to every single meeting that he has in China and Asia more broadly ... to drive business. So this is all about filling his pockets.”

The military parade on Wednesday marked the 80th anniversary of Japan’s defeat in World War II and was billed by Beijing as a demonstration of China’s global leadership.

The parade showcased more than 10,000 troops, hypersonic missiles, and an intercontinental ballistic missile launcher capable of hitting Australia.

Prime Minister Albanese declined to condemn his close friend, insisting that Mr Andrews was not acting on behalf of the government.

https://www.skynews.com.au/australia-news/politics/filling-his-pockets-resurfaced-footage-shows-former-victorian-premier-daniel-andrews-praising-china-ahead-of-parade-of-dictators/news-story/797965921fd9868ead3b7ae64def0785

https://x.com/GlobalWatchCGTN/status/1903688159973855678

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122174

File: 6626bc5ef689348⋯.mp4 (15.99 MB,480x270,16:9,Clipboard.mp4)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23546844 (041137ZSEP25) Notable: Video: Former premier of Victoria, Australia: China's renewable energy drive deserves greater global recognition - "Ahead of the 2025 China Development Forum, Daniel Andrews, former premier of Victoria, Australia, sat down with CGTN's Cui Yingjie in Beijing for an exclusive interview, sharing his insights on China's high-quality development and its role in the global green transition. As a reformer who spearheaded Victoria's shift away from fossil fuels, he said, "Formal Australia-China cooperation on decarbonizing heavy industries and advancing wind and solar technologies must be our next priority - this isn't just about our nations' futures, but the health of the planet." He praised China's new quality productive forces as a transformative model, stressing that China's progress in renewable energy deserves far greater global recognition. He also pointed out that while the United States remains obsessed with "erratic and nonsensical tariff games," Australia and China are forging a new path toward global sustainability through pragmatic collaboration." - CGTN

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122156

>>122162

>>122171

>>122173

Former premier of Victoria, Australia: China's renewable energy drive deserves greater global recognition

CGTN - 22-Mar-2025

Ahead of the 2025 China Development Forum, Daniel Andrews, former premier of Victoria, Australia, sat down with CGTN's Cui Yingjie in Beijing for an exclusive interview, sharing his insights on China's high-quality development and its role in the global green transition. As a reformer who spearheaded Victoria's shift away from fossil fuels, he said, "Formal Australia-China cooperation on decarbonizing heavy industries and advancing wind and solar technologies must be our next priority—this isn't just about our nations' futures, but the health of the planet." He praised China's new quality productive forces as a transformative model, stressing that China's progress in renewable energy deserves far greater global recognition. He also pointed out that while the United States remains obsessed with "erratic and nonsensical tariff games," Australia and China are forging a new path toward global sustainability through pragmatic collaboration.

https://news.cgtn.com/news/2025-03-22/Ex-Victoria-premier-China-s-renewable-energy-efforts-deserve-praise-1BWGLoH3UNG/p.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122175

File: d3434b2ede7a0ba⋯.jpg (110.73 KB,1280x720,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 78cdaf23e4dd633⋯.jpg (148.27 KB,2047x1152,2047:1152,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 2afff356e785c05⋯.jpg (229.98 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: b9dcda2715c39cb⋯.jpg (99.79 KB,750x422,375:211,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23548382 (041837ZSEP25) Notable: Anthony Albanese talks critical minerals in ‘warm’ chat with Trump ahead of US visit - Anthony Albanese has held his fourth call with Donald Trump since the US President’s re-election, discussing trade, economic co-operation and critical minerals. The Australian Prime Minister described the exchange as “warm and constructive” and said shared security interests were also covered. Albanese will travel to New York later this month to address the UN General Assembly, where he will recognise the State of Palestine, a policy at odds with Washington. The call fuels hopes of a first face-to-face meeting, though uncertainty lingers over AUKUS as the Pentagon reviews the submarine pact.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109241 (pb)

Anthony Albanese talks critical minerals in ‘warm’ chat with Trump ahead of US visit

JOE KELLY and GEOFF CHAMBERS - 5 September 2025

Anthony Albanese has spoken with Donald Trump for the fourth time since the US President was re-elected last November, with the two leaders discussing economic co-operation, trade and critical minerals at a key time for the alliance relationship.

The phone call will boost hopes of a much anticipated meeting between both leaders, with Mr Albanese set to travel shortly to New York where he will address the UN General Assembly and officially recognise the State of Palestine – a point of policy conflict with Washington.

Posting on social media, the Australian Prime Minister said that he had “another warm and constructive conversation with President @realDonaldTrump. We discussed our trade and economic relationship as well as areas for growth including critical minerals.”

“We also discussed shared US-Australia security interests,” he said.

An Australian read-out of the conversation said that both men discussed the “strength of our relationship and the importance of our shared security interests.”

However, there was no mention of the landmark AUKUS agreement under which the US has agreed to provide Australia with at least three Virginia-class submarines from the early 2030s.

The trilateral AUKUS agreement between the US, UK and Australia is currently being reviewed by the Pentagon – heightening fears that the Trump administration could seek to modify the deal.

Mr Albanese has not yet met face-to-face with the US President, but is travelling to New York later this month to address the UN General Assembly in what could present another opportunity for an in person encounter between the two leaders.

The Australian Prime Minister has previously said that he is available for a meeting with Mr Trump at “very short notice, at any time” and that Australia would continue to engage with the US.

Speaking in August, Mr Albanese said the US President had given him a “very warm phone conversation after my re-election as Prime Minister, and made some public comments about what he thought, that was very generous, and I thank him for it.”

Australia’s alliance relationship with the US faces a period of uncertainty. In addition to the Pentagon’s review of the AUKUS agreement, Canberra has rejected consistent American demands for defence spending to be lifted to 3.5 per cent of GDP and the Albanese government has criticised the imposition by Washington of a baseline ten per cent tariff on Australia.

Previous attempts for Mr Albanese to meet with the US President have fallen through including at June’s G7 summit in Canada, where Mr Trump left early to return to Washington to oversee the American response to the unfolding crisis in the Middle East – with the President eventually ordering the prevision bombing of Iran’s nuclear enrichment sites.

The pair first spoke shortly after Mr Trump’s November 2024 election win, with Mr Albanese saying at the time that he had personally congratulated the US President on his victory.

“We talked about the importance of the Alliance, and the strength of the Australia-US relationship in security, AUKUS, trade and investment,” Mr Albanese said. “I look forward to working together in the interests of both our countries.”

They spoke for a second time in February for 40 minutes ahead of the introduction of Mr Trump’s sweeping reciprocal tariffs in April, with Mr Albanese describing their conversation as “warm” and “positive.”

The pair talked about AUKUS and the economic relationship, with Mr Trump later describing the Australian Prime Minister as a “very fine man.” He also said he would give “great consideration” to exempting Australia from his steel and aluminium tariffs – although this was an outcome that never came to pass.

In May, the leaders spoke again after Mr Albanese’s election victory. AUKUS and tariffs were, once again, two of the issues discussed. “I had a warm and positive conversation with President Trump ... and I thank him for his very warm message of congratulations,“ Mr Albanese said.

“We talked about how AUKUS and tariffs will continue to engage, we will engage with each other on a face-to-face basis at some time in the future. And I thank him for reaching out in such a positive way.”

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/anthony-albanese-talks-critical-minerals-in-warm-chat-with-trump-ahead-of-us-visit/news-story/c1bf895b9e53010ebfc3d29c7c58189d

https://x.com/AlboMP/status/1963602153945403858

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122176

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23554268 (060225ZSEP25) Notable: ‘Lots going on’: Rudd weighs in after Trump, Albanese speak for fourth time - Anthony Albanese and Donald Trump held their fourth call since Trump’s re-election, discussing trade, security and critical minerals ahead of a possible meeting at this month’s UN General Assembly in New York. Albanese described the exchange as “warm and constructive” but did not mention AUKUS, which remains under Pentagon review. Australia’s ambassador to the US, Kevin Rudd, welcomed the call, saying the relationship was “going from strength to strength.” Critics note Albanese has yet to meet Trump in person, while US allies including Britain, Japan and India have secured face-to-face talks.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109569 (pb)

>>122175

‘Lots going on’: Rudd weighs in after Trump, Albanese speak for fourth time

Michael Koziol - September 5, 2025

1/2

Washington: Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and US President Donald Trump spoke by phone on Thursday night in what the Australian leader described as a “warm and constructive” call that canvassed economic and security interests, including the supply of critical minerals.

The call marked the fourth time the two leaders have spoken since Trump was re-elected last November, and comes ahead of a long-awaited potential meeting in person at this month’s United Nations General Assembly meeting in New York, or in Washington.

According to the Australian summary of the call, Albanese and Trump discussed economic co-operation and “opportunities to work together on trade and critical minerals in the interests of both nations”.

They also discussed “the strength of our relationship and the importance of our shared security interests”.

Albanese posted on social media minutes before midnight: “Tonight I had another warm and constructive conversation with President @realDonaldTrump. We discussed our trade and economic relationship as well as areas for growth including critical minerals. We also discussed shared US-Australia security interests.”

Neither Albanese nor the official readout mentioned whether the two men discussed the AUKUS submarine agreement, which is currently under review by the US Department of Defence, nor whether they made plans to meet in person. When asked, Albanese’s office said it had no further comment.

The White House confirmed the call, but there was no readout available more than seven hours later, and no further comment from White House officials. Trump also participated in a call with European leaders on Thursday morning, US time, and was due to speak with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky.

Diversifying US access to critical minerals - most of which are processed in China - is a major priority for the Trump administration, and Australian officials and diplomats have been positioning Australia as the natural supplier of choice, having 36 of the 50 identified as critical by the US.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122177

File: 79216d3a09a82b6⋯.jpg (283.36 KB,2000x1333,2000:1333,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 01bc507b2e82654⋯.jpg (1.23 MB,3345x2271,1115:757,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 4a9be06f40aec0f⋯.jpg (2.27 MB,4256x2832,266:177,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23554534 (060329ZSEP25) Notable: Former US, Australian defence heads reunite to urge Trump to stick with AUKUS - Former US defence secretary Jim Mattis, ex-Australian defence minister Marise Payne, former UK chief of defence staff Nicholas Carter and ex-US naval chief Gary Roughead have urged the Trump administration not to abandon AUKUS. Writing in Foreign Affairs, they warned that cancelling or weakening the pact “would do the work of Washington’s adversaries,” stressing its deterrent effect on China and Russia. The essay admitted the deal’s industrial costs but argued “these costs are worth the benefits.” The Pentagon review, led by Elbridge Colby, is fuelling fears Trump may retreat from the Biden-era pact.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122176

Former US, Australian defence heads reunite to urge Trump to stick with AUKUS

Michael Koziol - September 3, 2025

1/2

New York: A high-level coalition of former ministers and military leaders is urging the Trump administration not to abandon the AUKUS pact with Australia and the United Kingdom, saying that while it will rob the US of nuclear-powered submarines at a crucial time, the benefits are worth the cost.

Jim Mattis, who served as Donald Trump’s defence secretary in his first term, co-wrote a piece published in the respected journal Foreign Affairs with former Australian defence minister Marise Payne, former British chief of defence staff Nicholas Carter and former US chief of naval operations Gary Roughead.

Published overnight, the essay warns that cancelling or substantially weakening AUKUS “would do the work of Washington’s adversaries for them”, noting both China and Russia do not like the alliance.

“The strongest argument for AUKUS is that China and Russia object to it,” the authors say. “When a country’s adversaries don’t like what it is doing, it should usually press on.”

Under the pact, the US is due to sell Australia between three and five Virginia-class submarines in the 2030s, before Australia and the UK build a new class of vessel together, for entry into service in the 2040s.

However, the US president of the day has the final say on whether those submarines are sold to Australia, and the Navy – including Trump’s pick for chief of naval operations Daryl Caudle, who was sworn in last week – has warned the deal cannot be fulfilled unless the US lifts production from 1.2 boats a year to 2.3.

In the essay, Mattis, Payne, Carter and Roughead argue AUKUS will eventually enrich the maritime industrial bases of all three countries – even if the US must give up some submarines at a time when it is not producing enough for its own needs.

“These costs are worth the benefits,” they write. “The three states will essentially be operating common submarines, which will ultimately provide industry with a longer runway and thus the necessary industrial predictability to increase production.”

The authors say AUKUS will deter China by placing more nuclear attack submarines in the Pacific, even if they lack nuclear warheads, as Australia’s will. It would also enable American and British submarines to patrol elsewhere as circumstances demanded, troubling Moscow.

Mattis, Payne and the others acknowledge problems with AUKUS, particularly the second pillar of the program under which members are supposed to co-operate on emerging defence technologies.

Such co-operation requires sharing data and technologies which are usually highly protected: the authors say this part of AUKUS is “operationally adrift”, and more must be done to break down those barriers.

They also contend that sticking with the deal is symbolically important at a time when the US’s credibility as a reliable ally and partner is being questioned around the world. “Washington should thus do more than just recommit to AUKUS. It should revitalise the pact for the decades ahead,” they write.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122178

File: eeceb2289f2e164⋯.jpg (487.04 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23554542 (060330ZSEP25) Notable: Don’t Abandon AUKUS: The Case for Recommitting to - and Revitalizing - the Alliance - Gary Roughead, Marise Payne, Nicholas Carter and James Mattis - September 2, 2025 - https://archive.is/20250902160752/https://www.foreignaffairs.com/united-states/dont-abandon-aukus-jim-mattis - https://qalerts.app/?q=Mattis

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122177

2/2

While the essay is unlikely to be read personally by Trump, who prefers television, it is certain to catch the attention of key decision-makers in the administration, including the undersecretary of defence for policy, Elbridge Colby, who is leading the Pentagon’s AUKUS review, and his deputy Alexander Velez-Green.

Colby has written for Foreign Affairs himself, arguing in a 2022 essay that the US should be doing much more to prepare for a potential war with China over Taiwan by redirecting military assets away from other spheres – such as Europe and the Middle East – to the Indo-Pacific.

That is now central to the Pentagon’s concerns about AUKUS, chiefly its desire for more information about if and how Australia would use the submarines in a conflict with China over Taiwan or other issues.

One of the strongest advocates of the deal in the US Congress, Democratic representative from Connecticut Joe Courtney, also authored an opinion piece on the weekend saying that abandoning or truncating the deal would “be met with great rejoicing in Beijing”.

Writing in National Interest magazine, Courtney said Colby should look past the current production tally of Virginia-class submarines because significant investments in the maritime industrial base were coming to fruition and would be paying dividends in the 2030s.

The essays underscore the substantial fears in the political and military establishments of all three AUKUS countries that Trump will back away from the Joe Biden-era deal.

They also come at a time of frayed relations after a mangled visit to Washington last week by Australian Deputy Prime Minister and Defence Minister Richard Marles.

While Marles met Vice President J.D. Vance, Secretary of State Marco Rubio and White House deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller, his encounter with US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth remains under a cloud of mystery.

After Australian officials released photographs of Marles and Hegseth, the Pentagon initially described it as a “happenstance encounter” rather than a proper meeting. But a spokesman later issued a statement saying the meeting was co-ordinated in advance. This masthead reported the encounter lasted about 10 minutes.

The Pentagon was contacted for comment on the Foreign Affairs essay. It has previously said its review of the AUKUS pact would be completed in the northern autumn, which could mean any time between now and Christmas.

https://www.theage.com.au/world/north-america/former-us-australian-defence-heads-reunite-to-urge-trump-to-stick-with-aukus-20250903-p5mrxt.html

Don’t Abandon AUKUS

The Case for Recommitting to — and Revitalizing — the Alliance

Gary Roughead, Marise Payne, Nicholas Carter and James Mattis - September 2, 2025

https://www.foreignaffairs.com/united-states/dont-abandon-aukus-jim-mattis

https://archive.is/20250902160752/https://www.foreignaffairs.com/united-states/dont-abandon-aukus-jim-mattis

https://qalerts.app/?q=Mattis

https://qresear.ch/?q=Mattis

https://qresear.ch/?q=Marise+Payne

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122179

File: 09f320a358a09c1⋯.jpg (279.74 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 31471a2e83d1e44⋯.jpg (160.57 KB,1920x1080,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: a68b995d588153a⋯.jpg (725.2 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 0506426e80c89ea⋯.jpg (102.43 KB,768x1024,3:4,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23554707 (060441ZSEP25) Notable: Access and influence: how ‘Statesman Dan’ is getting rich in China - Former Victorian premier Daniel Andrews has been praised in Chinese state accounts of business meetings for pledging to “spare no effort” in promoting ties, inviting delegations to Melbourne and calling himself an “old friend of the Chinese people.” Records show Andrews and his private business partner Marty Mei met with senior Chinese think tanks in 2024, lauding co-operation in trade, education and tourism. Since leaving politics, Andrews has established Wedgetail Partners, operating from his Mulgrave home, with a 90 per cent stake held through Glencairn Street, a company of which he is the sole director and shareholder. Labor sources say his Beijing parade appearance will strengthen his growing China-focused business.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122156

>>122162

>>122171

>>122173

Access and influence: how ‘Statesman Dan’ is getting rich in China

DAMON JOHNSTON - September 04, 2025

1/2

Former Victorian premier Daniel Andrews has spoken in statesmanlike terms in meetings with Chinese business leaders, promoting closer economic ties between China and Australia, inviting senior figures to visit Melbourne and indicating he will “spare no effort” to boost exchanges and co-operation with the communist superpower, according to published accounts of top-level talks held since he left office.

Just one day after sparking an international storm by after rubbing shoulders with some of the world’s most notorious dictators when he attended Xi Jinping’s military parade, details of Mr Andrews’ booming China-focused private business interests have emerged.

“This was all about access and influence; both add up to big dollars for Dan,” one source said of his controversial attendance at the event with the world’s harshest dictators.

As heat intensified in Australia over the ex-premier’s appearance, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese hardened his position when grilled in Question Time over the issue, but still avoided personally criticising his friend and former Labor premier.

“My position is very, very clear. Which is we did not send any government representative because it would not have been appropriate,” he said. “None of my people would have sat in that position, as simple as that.” Labor Premier Jacinta Allan stood by her predecessor, saying

Mr Andrews’ links to China were “good for Victoria” and “Victoria is an old friend of China and these connections are so valuable for our state”.

Two Chinese business think tanks – the China Institute for South China Sea Studies and the China Center for International Economic Exchanges – lauded Mr Andrews in official records of the meetings in March and October 2024, with one describing him as “former Victoria Governor Andrews of Australia”.

After meeting Mr Andrews and his former government senior China adviser and now private business partner, Marty Mei, in March last year, the CISCSS said they discussed “international exchanges” between Hainan Province and Victoria.

The tone and content of both official accounts of the 2024 business meetings suggest that Mr Andrews’ reputation in China as an influential Australian political leader remains one of his key selling points as he builds a thriving business empire.

“The two sides exchange views on international exchanges and co-operation between Hainan Province and Victoria State in the fields of think tank construction, education, culture, tourism, etc, as well as Hainan’s high-level opening up and the construction of a free trade port with Chinese characteristics,” the CISCSS’s account of the March meeting at the Boao Forum stated.

“(Daniel Andrews) expressed that he sincerely invited and welcomed (CISCSS) President Wang Sheng and his delegation to visit Melbourne,” the account states.

“As an old friend and good friend of the Chinese people, he will spare no effort to promote exchanges and co-operation between Hainan Province and Victoria in the fields of economy, trade, culture, education, tourism, etc, promote common development and achieve mutual benefit and win-win results.”

The Australian has approached Mr Andrews and Mr Mei for comment.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122180

File: df6a65b20b51700⋯.jpg (128.19 KB,1280x720,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23554753 (060502ZSEP25) Notable: ‘Deeply honoured’ Daniel Andrews spruiks Xi’s parade in People’s Daily - Former Victorian premier Daniel Andrews was quoted in China’s People’s Daily as “deeply honoured” to attend Xi Jinping’s military parade, hailing China’s WWII role as having “global significance.” He defended his trip as an opportunity to meet Xi, John Key, Helen Clark and Anwar Ibrahim, while claiming his record shows opposition to Putin and Iran. Anthony Albanese distanced himself, stressing no government representative attended, while critics in business and academia called Andrews’ actions “bizarre” and opportunistic. Sinologist Geremie Barme labelled attendees “useless idiots,” contrasting with Victorian Premier Jacinta Allan, who said Andrews’ standing in China was “good for Victoria” as he expands his China-focused consultancy.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122156

>>122162

>>122171

>>122173

‘Deeply honoured’ Daniel Andrews spruiks Xi’s parade in People’s Daily

WILL GLASGOW and BEN PACKHAM - September 04, 2025

1/2

Beijing’s propaganda machine has quoted fawning former Victorian premier Daniel Andrews in the Communist Party’s flagship daily as being “deeply honoured” to attend President Xi Jinping’s gargantuan military parade.

Anthony Albanese distanced himself on Thursday from Mr Andrews’ decision to join a historic gathering of dictators while even senior figures in the China-focused business community condemned the ex-premier’s “bizarre” behaviour.

The Australian was unable to contact Mr Andrews, who is believed still to be in Beijing in meetings related to his China-focused consultancy, which has Andrew Forrest’s iron ore giant Fortescue as an anchor client.

In an unapologetic statement released on Thursday afternoon, Mr Andrews defended his outing with Mr Xi and the Chinese leader’s guests of honour, the Russian and North Korean dictators, Vladimir Putin and Kim Jong-un, at an event Beijing used to assert its increasingly lethal military capabilities.

“I’ve said for years that a constructive relationship with China, our largest trading partner, is in Australia’s national interest and hundreds of thousands of Australian jobs depend on it – that hasn't changed,” Mr Andrews said in his first comments since Beijing announced he would attend the PLA parade to mark China’s victory over Japan in World War II.

The historic gathering of Mr Xi, Putin and Kim on Wednesday – a message of defiance directed at Washington and the US-alliance system — marked the first time the leaders of China, Russia and North Korea had been in the same place since the 1950s.

Mr Andrews’ attendance continued a long pattern of splitting with Canberra on China policy, including his decision to sign Victoria up for Mr Xi’s Belt and Road Initiative in 2018.

The Prime Minister on Thursday refused for a second day to condemn his former flatmate’s decision to attend the event, but told parliament: “None of my people would have sat in that position. I am not responsible for what every Australian citizen does. What I’m responsible for … is what our government does.

“My position is very, very clear, which is — we did not send any government representative because it would not have been appropriate. It certainly is not something that I would have even thought of doing and no-one in my government would have thought of doing. Simple as that.”

Mr Andrews said in his statement that his trip to China had allowed him to “meet and engage” with former New Zealand prime ministers John Key and Helen Clark, Malaysian Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim “and of course Chinese President Xi”.

“We also shared an official photograph,” Mr Andrews said of his moment on Beijing’s red carpet with Xi.

In his statement, Mr Andrews also attempted to brandish his anti-authoritarian credentials.

“And just so there’s no confusion – I have condemned Putin and his illegal war in Ukraine from day one. That’s why he banned me from Russia last year,” he said.

“Further, my support for Israel and Australia’s Jewish community has been outspoken and unwavering, and I unequivocally condemn Iran for its attacks on Australia, Israel and elsewhere in the world.”

While Mr Andrews continued to avoid Australian media interviews, he appeared to be more talkative to Beijing’s official mouthpieces.

Mr Andrews was one of a gaggle of former politicians featured in the parade day edition of the People’s Daily, Beijing’s flagship masthead. The Australian was unable to reach Mr Andrews to confirm the accuracy of the quotes attributed to him.

“I am deeply honoured to be invited by China to attend this solemn commemoration,” Mr Andrews was quoted as saying in a piece on page 6 of Wednesday’s paper with the headline: “China is a key force in maintaining world peace, stability and development”.

Mr Andrews was quoted as saying most Australians were ignorant of China’s history in World War II, which he said had “global significance”.

“In Australia, many people do not know the history of the Chinese People’s war of resistance against Japanese aggression,” Andrews was quoted as saying.

“There is no doubt that the victory of the Chinese People’s war of resistance against Japanese aggression had a significant impact on turning the tide in the Asian theatre of World War II. This history has broader regional and even global significance.

“The victory of the Chinese People’s war of resistance against Japanese aggression safeguarded world peace and justice.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122181

File: b790993295d03fa⋯.jpg (223.11 KB,1144x555,1144:555,Clipboard.jpg)

File: eb0de85154b9d26⋯.jpg (107.92 KB,1280x720,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23554835 (060602ZSEP25) Notable: China praises Daniel Andrews for defending ‘peace and justice’ but accuses Australia of ‘undermining stability - Beijing hailed former Victorian premier Daniel Andrews as an example of “defending historical memory” after he joined Xi Jinping’s parade and a medal ceremony, praising him in official media. At the same time, the PLA condemned Australia, the US, Canada and the Philippines for conducting a freedom-of-navigation exercise in the South China Sea with HMAS Brisbane, calling it a threat to “peace and stability.” Canberra stressed the patrol upheld international law. ALP president Wayne Swan criticised Andrews for defying efforts to downgrade Australian representation, while Penny Wong and Richard Marles met their Japanese counterparts in Tokyo, stressing Australia and Japan's shared “values and trust” amid growing concerns over Chinese militarism.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122156

>>122162

>>122171

>>122173

China praises Daniel Andrews for defending ‘peace and justice’ but accuses Australia of ‘undermining stability’

WILL GLASGOW - 5 September 2025

1/2

Beijing has applauded former Victorian premier Daniel ­Andrews for joining the Chinese government in defending “peace and ­justice,” as the People’s Liberation Army accused Australia and its ­allies of “undermining regional peace and stability” by conducting a joint freedom-of-navigation ­exercise on the day of President Xi Jinping’s vast military parade.

China’s Foreign Ministry on Friday night suggested Mr Andrews and other “leaders, former statesman, high-level officials, ­envoys and friends” were examples for the Albanese government and others in the international community to follow, after the former premier appeared on Mr Xi’s red carpet at the parade, and ­attended a medal ceremony for family members of foreign soldiers who fought alongside China in World War II.

Asked by The Australian about the controversy surrounding Mr Andrews’ attendance at the ­parade, Foreign Ministry spokesman Guo Jiakun said those who joined Mr Xi, Russian President Vladimir Putin and North Korean leader Kim Jong-un were showing their commitment to “defending historical memory” and “peace and justice”.

“China stands ready to work with all peace-loving countries and people to have a correct ­perception of history, jointly ­defend the fruits of World War II and the post-war international order and safeguard peace and ­stability,” Mr Guo said.

The comments came after ­Beijing’s propaganda machine continued to feature Mr Andrews. News agency Xinhua reported on his attendance at the medal ­ceremony, where he was near the centre, in the front row of the ­family picture of the event run by the Chinese People’s Association for Friendship with Foreign ­Countries.

People familiar with Mr Andrews’ China-focused consultancy have said he hoped this week’s photos, above all his picture with China’s President on a red carpet in Tiananmen Square, will help ­attract more Chinese business clients.

While Mr Andrews was being praised in China, ALP president Wayne Swan joined the chorus of critics of the former premier’s decision to attend the military parade, defying Canberra’s efforts to demote Australian representation. Anthony Albanese’s ­decision to lower official representation below ambassador level was accompanied by a joint maritime operation that enraged Beijing.

An Australian navy vessel joined counterparts from Canada, the Philippines and the US for the exercise, which began on Tuesday and continued on Wednesday, as Mr Xi brought together his historic assembly in Tiananmen Square to admire the PLA’s increasingly lethal capabilities. In a statement, Australia’s defence department said the exercise was conducted within the Philippines’ exclusive economic zone.

“The Maritime Cooperative Activity was conducted from 2 to 3 September 2025, with the Royal Australian Navy’s guided-missile destroyer HMAS Brisbane participating alongside the Philippine Navy’s frigate BRP Jose Rizal and the Royal Canadian Navy’s frigate HMCS Ville de Quebec,” the department said.

“P-8A Poseidon maritime ­patrol aircraft from the Royal Australian Air Force and the United States Navy also supported the activity.

“This MCA demonstrates the collective commitment of Australia and its partners to upholding the right to freedom of navigation and overflight, other lawful uses of the sea and international airspace, as well as respect for maritime rights under international law, as reflected in the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea.”

A PLA spokesman denounced the exercise.

“The Philippines is soliciting foreign countries to conduct so-called joint patrols, undermining regional peace and stability,” said a spokesperson for the PLA’s Southern Theatre Command.

Senior Colonel Tian Junli added: “The theatre command’s troops remain on high alert at all times and resolutely defend China’s territorial sovereignty and maritime rights and interests. Any attempt to disrupt the situation in the South China Sea or create hotspots will not succeed.”

He noted that China’s navy had responded with its own “routine patrol”.

China’s official mouthpieces bristled at the “noteworthy” timing of this “latest provocation” by Australia, Canada, the Philippines and the US.

“This makes the ­Marcos government’s move extremely egregious as the Philippines also suffered from Japanese aggression,” the state owned China Daily said in an editorial in its Friday edition.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122182

File: 641c08742a22a2f⋯.mp4 (12.23 MB,640x360,16:9,Clipboard.mp4)

File: 662cf88c0ac885b⋯.jpg (1.89 MB,5000x3333,5000:3333,Clipboard.jpg)

File: d90e8b97f99ab47⋯.jpg (1.72 MB,5000x3333,5000:3333,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23554852 (060620ZSEP25) Notable: Video: Penny Wong cautions Daniel Andrews on China visit after meetings in Japan - Foreign Minister Penny Wong urged former Victorian premier Daniel Andrews to be “mindful” of the message he sent by attending Xi Jinping’s military parade with Vladimir Putin and Kim Jong-un. She stressed Australia deliberately limited representation to embassy staff, unlike in 2015 when a Coalition government minister attended the same anniversary event. Speaking in Tokyo after 2+2 talks, Wong and Defence Minister Richard Marles highlighted concerns about China’s military build-up, closer ties with Russia and North Korea, and the need to strengthen partnerships with Japan. Marles announced progress on a $10 billion deal for 11 Mogami-class frigates, with three built in Japan and the rest in Australia.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109485 (pb)

>>122162

>>122171

>>122173

Penny Wong cautions Daniel Andrews on China visit after meetings in Japan

Stephen Dziedzic and James Oaten - 5 September 2025

Foreign Minister Penny Wong has cautioned former Victorian premier Daniel Andrews to be "mindful" about the message he sent by attending a huge military parade in Beijing earlier this week.

The Coalition has furiously criticised Mr Andrews for joining several authoritarian leaders — including Russian President Vladimir Putin and North Korean dictator Kim Jong Un — at the massive spectacle held on Wednesday to mark the defeat of Japan in World War II.

It has also pressed Prime Minister Anthony Albanese to condemn Mr Andrews, saying he assisted China's efforts to give the spectacle international legitimacy.

When asked about the matter, Senator Wong did not directly criticise the former premier, but said all Australians needed to be "mindful" about the signals they sent by attending events.

"Obviously I speak for Australia and the Australian government, I don't speak for private individuals," she said.

"But I think, I hope, that we all should be mindful of the message that our presence and engagement sends.

"I certainly am."

She also emphasised that Australia decided not to send any politicians or even its ambassador to attend the parade — in contrast to the last anniversary parade in 2015, when a Coalition government minister attended.

"I would emphasise that Australia made a decision to be represented at the embassy staff level," Senator Wong said.

The foreign minister made the remarks alongside Defence Minister Richard Marles in Tokyo, after attending the annual 2 + 2 meeting with their Japanese counterparts.

Australia to 'modernise' defence force after 'significant' show from China

Both Australia and Japan have been deeply unnerved by China's massive military build-up and monitored this week's parade very closely

Mr Marles called it a "very significant display of Chinese military capability".

He also said there was now a "greater degree of cooperation between China and Russia and North Korea" which he said was "an expression of the complex strategic landscape which we've now been articulating since we came to government".

He said Australia was responding by building closer ties with partners like Japan and racing to "modernise and build our defence force".

"Where that leads us is clearly seeing that our interest lies in ensuring that we are firstly asserting the rules-based order, and secondly, making our contribution to the peace and stability of the region in which we live," he said.

The high-level meeting comes just a month after Australia announced it would spend $10 billion on buying Japanese-made Mogami-class frigates.

It is the biggest defence deal for Japan, which has only ever exported defence equipment, rather than platforms like tanks, fighter jets, and warships.

Mr Marles said the contract to buy the warships would be finalised early next year.

"There is a real intent on both sides to see those negotiations move forward quickly," he said.

The first three Mogami frigates will be built in Japan to ensure quick delivery, while the remaining eight will be made in Australia.

Mr Marles stressed the Mogami frigate was selected primarily due to its suitability for the Australian navy, but added it would further deepen the strategic partnership between Australia and Japan.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-09-05/penny-wong-comments-on-dan-andrews-in-japan-tokyo-visit/105741584

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122183

File: 393ea8d0fc7c657⋯.jpg (208.56 KB,1826x1028,913:514,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 6dad66f045d5bdb⋯.jpg (186.96 KB,1777x1000,1777:1000,Clipboard.jpg)

File: e248924d2b25886⋯.jpg (340.42 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 1a7b16e16087066⋯.jpg (260.18 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23554868 (060631ZSEP25) Notable: Chinese embassy officials observe Canberra spy case in court - A woman accused of spying for China in Canberra has pleaded not guilty to foreign interference charges after allegedly receiving $230,000 to gather intelligence on the Guan Yin Citta Buddhist Association, a group banned in China. Court documents allege she collected addresses, financial data and photos for a handler working for China’s Public Security Bureau. Prosecutors seized 2.5 terabytes of data from nine devices. The ACT Chief Magistrate extended a suppression order on her identity, citing risks of prejudice, as Chinese embassy officials quietly observed proceedings. Police said she travelled repeatedly to China and amassed hundreds of thousands of dollars worth of luxury goods, including high-end handbags “that were too numerous to practicably count.”

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109469 (pb)

>>109483 (pb)

>>109486 (pb)

Chinese embassy officials observe Canberra spy case in court

LIAM MENDES - September 01, 2025

A woman accused of spying on behalf of the Chinese Communist Party in the heart of Canberra has invoked Bruce Lehrmann’s aborted criminal trial to keep her identity a secret, as members of the Chinese embassy quietly attended a hearing to watch her in court.

The woman, who cannot be named because of a suppression order, on Monday indicated she would plead not guilty to working as a “proxy” to covertly gather ­information for an official working for China’s security bureau about Canberra’s Guan Yin Citta Buddhist Association.

The ACT Magistrates Court heard prosecutors had seized nine devices – amassing a total of 2.5tb of data – which has to be analysed and translated.

An application to extend the suppression order in place since not long after her arrest in August was granted by ACT Chief Magistrate Lorraine Walker on the grounds that a juror could conduct research about the accused.

The woman has been charged with one count of reckless foreign interference after allegedly feeding information to China’s Public Security Bureau about the Canberra Guan Yin Citta Buddhist Association, a group banned in China.

If found guilty, she faces a maximum 15 years’ jail. She appeared emotionless on Monday after being quietly led into the courtroom.

The permanent Australian resident is accused of receiving more than $230,000 while taking instructions from a mysterious security official over encrypted messaging platform WeChat.

Her barrister, Anthony Williamson, said she would be pleading not guilty. In applying for the suppression to be continued, he referred to the 2022 criminal rape trial of Mr Lehrmann, which was aborted from juror misconduct and saw his charges dropped.

The application for the extension of the suppression order was heard in a secret room listed under a pseudonym in court, attended only by legal representatives from the AFP, Commonwealth Department of Public Prosecutions, Nationwide News (publisher of this masthead), her own legal representatives and supporters as well as members of the media.

Sitting inconspicuously in the courtroom, however, were two mysterious individuals, who refused to answer questions upon leaving and drove away in a Diplomatic Corps-plated vehicle, with a number-plate prefix corresponding to the Chinese embassy.

The court was closed for some 15 minutes for her defence to put part of the application for continued suppression order to the magistrate. In continuing the suppression order, Chief Magistrate Walker noted the “high profile” nature of the matter and that there was “highly prejudicial” information in the public domain about the defendant.

“It is a matter which by its very nature is likely to pique a certain curiosity in the level of apprehension in relation to anyone who may be a juror in these proceedings, which ultimately must be heard in the Supreme Court before a jury,” she said.

“I perceive a very real likelihood of prejudice to this defendant at this point in time, if her name is made public, and jurors are potentially influenced.”

Chief Magistrate Walker also noted it was only the third time an individual had been charged under the legislation and the first time in the jurisdiction.

Officers executing a search warrant on the woman’s home at the end of June located hundreds of thousands of dollars worth of ­luxury goods, including a Rolex watch receipt, large boxes of high-end handbags “that were too numerous to practicably count” and a receipt for a mystery item costing $400,000.

Court documents show the woman travelled to China on “several occasions in the past ­several years” including to the ­region where her alleged security handler was employed.

She is alleged to have received “taskings” from the handler attached to the Jindong Branch – 650km east of Wuhan – from June 2, 2022, to ­covertly collect ­information and infiltrate the ­association.

Police believe the woman, who first entered Australia on a higher education visa, secretly collected information about the Guan Yin Citta organisation, including ­details regarding the residential addresses of former leaders of the group and their national office ­locations.

She allegedly provided photos of the front doors of businesses, internal map data of locations and financial information about organisations and businesses, as well as gathering information about a radio station and its affiliations with the Buddhist group.

The matter will return to court on November 10.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/chinese-embassy-officials-observe-canberra-spy-case-in-court/news-story/0f6021f02dc27e91ea1c51c2764fa654

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122184

File: e320211e1b839a6⋯.jpg (702.28 KB,2244x1497,748:499,Clipboard.jpg)

File: dec54d582cbaf24⋯.jpg (3.41 MB,2778x1852,3:2,Clipboard.jpg)

File: a2f87f8b49965c0⋯.jpg (2.8 MB,2736x1824,3:2,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23555135 (060947ZSEP25) Notable: High Court throws out Ben Roberts-Smith’s defamation appeal bid - The High Court has rejected Ben Roberts-Smith’s final attempt to overturn his defamation loss, ending seven years of litigation costing more than $30 million. The former SAS corporal, accused of murdering four unarmed Afghan prisoners including a man with a prosthetic leg, failed to gain special leave to appeal after the Full Court upheld Justice Anthony Besanko’s findings. The court said the case raised no legal principle and had “insufficient prospects of success.” Roberts-Smith must pay Nine’s legal costs. Journalists Nick McKenzie and Chris Masters hailed the ruling, crediting SAS witnesses and remembering Afghan victims whose families are still waiting for justice.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109566 (pb)

>>109568 (pb)

High Court throws out Ben Roberts-Smith’s defamation appeal bid

Michaela Whitbourn - September 4, 2025

1/2

The High Court has thrown out Ben Roberts-Smith’s last-ditch bid to appeal against his damning defamation loss, putting an end to seven years of litigation costing tens of millions of dollars.

On Thursday, the nation’s highest court refused the former Special Air Service corporal’s application for special leave to appeal against a decision of the Full Court of the Federal Court, which had rejected his bid to overturn a decision that found he had committed war crimes.

Roberts-Smith, a Victoria Cross recipient, launched the defamation case against The Age and The Sydney Morning Herald in 2018, alleging the newspapers defamed him in a series of articles that year suggesting he was a war criminal.

The High Court said the application raised “no question of legal principle” and the proposed appeal had “insufficient prospects of success”.

Investigative journalists Nick McKenzie and Chris Masters, the lead authors of the articles, said in a joint statement that the case had been an “ordeal that all the nation has endured”.

“We are grateful to the courts for their sound and thorough deliberations, and to the Australian soldiers who had the moral courage to stand up for what was right and tell the truth about Ben Roberts-Smith.

“They are the heroes of this grim but vital story that the Australian public needs to know. We also remember the Afghan victims of war crimes whose families are still waiting for justice.”

Tory Maguire, Nine’s managing director of publishing, said the decision vindicated “the brave soldiers of Australia’s SAS Regiment who spoke the truth in telling their stories at great personal risk”.

“This is a win for them and the values they represent. While this case has been challenging at times for all of those who spoke up, for the journalists Nick McKenzie and Chris Masters, and their newsroom leaders, it was important for Nine to defend public interest journalism,” Maguire said.

“With no further legal options available on this matter, the closure of this litigation is an important milestone in that mission.”

In a decision in 2023, then-Federal Court judge Anthony Besanko upheld the newspapers’ truth defence and found to the civil standard of proof that Roberts-Smith was complicit in the murder of four unarmed prisoners, including a man with a prosthetic leg, while deployed in Afghanistan between 2009 and 2012.

Roberts-Smith lodged an appeal. The Full Court – Justices Nye Perram, Anna Katzmann and Geoffrey Kennett – said in a decision in May that the evidence was sufficiently cogent to support Besanko’s findings that Roberts-Smith murdered four Afghan men, contrary to the rules of engagement that bound the SAS.

The High Court refused special leave to appeal against that decision and ordered the former soldier to pay the newspapers’ legal costs.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122185

File: 87df501fc08d4ef⋯.mp4 (12.51 MB,960x540,16:9,Clipboard.mp4)

File: 12935171b700c49⋯.jpg (214.84 KB,1280x720,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23555154 (061013ZSEP25) Notable: Donald Day Jr, US conspiracy theorist connected to Wieambilla killers, agrees to watered-down plea deal – Arizona-based conspiracy theorist Donald Day Jr, who praised the 2022 Wieambilla police killers, has reached a plea deal to admit possessing firearms as a convicted felon, while prosecutors drop three other charges including threats against US police. Day, known online as “Geronimo’s Bones,” had called Gareth and Stacey Train his “brave brother and sister” after they murdered Queensland officers Matthew Arnold and Rachel McCrow and neighbour Alan Dare. Court filings list 34 weapons — including rifles, pistols, a revolver, and large quantities of ammunition — stored in a mobile home “gun room.” The plea limits punishment to the low end of sentencing ranges, pending court approval.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109588 (pb)

>>122153

Australian Army called in to assist Victoria Police in hunt for alleged cop killer Dezi Freeman

Specialist units from the Australian Army will join the search for Dezi Freeman after Victoria Police requested assistance to help find the alleged cop killer.

Patrick Hannaford - September 3, 2025

Specialist military units will be deployed in Porepunkah after Victoria Police requested ADF assistance to help track down alleged cop killer Dezi Freeman.

Hundreds of Victoria Police personnel have been deployed to Victoria’s high country to help find the self-proclaimed “sovereign citizen” since he allegedly shot and killed two police officers on August 26, however police have been unable to track down the 56-year-old nine days into the search.

Victoria Police have now requested assistance from the Australian Defence Force, with Defence Minister Richard Marles announcing the request would be met.

“The Australian Defence Force will work with Victorian police as they request our assistance in terms of the particular assets and capabilities,” Mr Marles told the ABC.

“We are providing a planning specialist in relation to this and that comes after a request from Victorian police.

“We’re also providing some air surveillance assets, again, coming after a request from Victorian police.”

Superintendent Brett Kahan revealed on Monday that Victoria Police believe Freeman is being helped or even harboured by local community members.

"People know the whereabouts of the person," Superintendent Kahan said.

"People have chosen — for whatever reason — not to come forward."

The latest revelations come as the Herald Sun revealed family and neighbours of Freeman had branded him a “coward” and a “hypocrite” who had benefitted from hundreds of thousands of dollars in taxpayer-funded welfare payments despite claiming not to recognise the legitimacy of the Australian state.

“He never worked, never had any money … that’s what used to sh*t me too because he was so against the government, but then got his Centrelink cheque every week,” one former neighbour said.

A relative of the fugitive told the Herald Sun he had been receiving a disability pension for more than 20 years, although they were unsure how he qualified for it, adding his family viewed him as a hypocrite.

“He always told everyone how poor he was and that he was the victim … The whole family kind of laughed at him,” the relative said.

https://www.skynews.com.au/australia-news/crime/australian-army-called-in-to-assist-victoria-police-in-hunt-for-alleged-cop-killer-dezi-freeman/news-story/750b4ddfc4280008a7120eed80f0985c

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122186

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23555170 (061028ZSEP25) Notable: Video: ‘My superhero’: Brother’s tribute to fallen officer – Senior Constable Vadim de Waart-Hottart, 34, was farewelled at a moving funeral service at the Victoria Police Academy, remembered by his younger brother Sacha as “my Batman” and “a ray of sunshine” whose smile and kindness touched all. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese, Premier Jacinta Allan, Police Minister Anthony Carbines and Chief Commissioner Mike Bush joined 3000 mourners. Tributes recalled his adventurous spirit, multilingual skills and devotion to family. Medals were presented in his honour, displayed alongside a Batman statue. De Waart-Hottart and Detective Leading Senior Constable Neal Thompson were killed while executing a warrant in Porepunkah; Freeman remains at large.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109588 (pb)

>>122153

>>122185

‘My superhero’: Brother’s tribute to fallen officer

LILY MCCAFFREY - September 05, 2025

1/2

To Sacha de Waart-Hottart, his older brother Vadim wasn’t just family – he was a real-life Batman, a superhero with a contagious smile, a bright personality and a deep desire to protect those around him.

It was in his efforts to shield others that Senior Constable Vadim de Waart-Hottart was shot dead at just 34 while in the line of duty in the small northeast Victoria town of Porepunkah last Tuesday.

“He was my very own superhero, he was my Batman. And when we grew up and I didn’t need protecting anymore, my brother found 23,000 new brothers and sisters in blue to keep protecting and he found a way to continue helping everyone he could,” Mr de Waart-Hottart told a packed and emotional funeral service on ­Friday morning.

Family and friends – some of whom had flown in from overseas – joined police colleagues and ­senior leaders to say goodbye to the hero officer at the Victoria Police Academy in Glen Waverley, where Senior Constable de Waart-Hottart began his policing career seven years ago.

Mr de Waart-Hottart called on those in the chapel to remember his older brother “for the way he lived, and not for the way he died”.

He described his brother as a “ray of sunshine” with a “contagious smile” who never had a bad word to say about anyone. “All my brother ever wanted to do is make people happy, make people love,” he said.

“Nothing can take away the sunshine that my brother has been to everyone here, nothing can take that away from us.”

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese, Victorian Premier Jacinta Allan, the state’s Police Minister Anthony Carbines and Victoria Police Chief Commissioner Mike Bush were among the 3000 people in attendance, with many more tuning in online.

Colleague and friend Constable Tali Walker-Davidson described Senior Constable de Waart-Hottart – who was fluent in French, Spanish, Flemish and English – as someone with a sense of adventure who always saw the good in everyone and loved being around people.

“He was honest, hilarious and never taking himself too seriously,” Ms Walker-Davidson said. “He truly packed so much into his life, he lived it to the absolute fullest.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122187

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23555183 (061038ZSEP25) Notable: Video: Police say $1m bounty is 'just another avenue' in the capture of Dezi Freeman – Victoria Police have offered a record $1 million reward for information leading to the arrest of alleged cop killer Desmond Freeman, accused of fatally shooting Detective Leading Senior Constable Neal Thompson and Senior Constable Vadim de Waart-Hottart on August 26. Detective Inspector Dean Thomas said the unprecedented reward recognises “the seriousness of this violent offending” and is aimed at drawing out those who may be harbouring him. More than 450 officers remain dedicated to the 12-day search across bushland and properties, with Freeman believed to be armed and dangerous. Authorities remain open to the possibility he is still on the run, but also concede he could be dead through self-harm.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109588 (pb)

>>122153

>>122185

Police say $1m bounty is 'just another avenue' in the capture of Dezi Freeman

Joseph Sahyoun - Sep 6, 2025

Victoria Police have said the historic $1 million dollar reward in the hunt for alleged cop killer Desmond Freeman is for information that leads to his apprehension, not his conviction.

The reward is the largest ever offered in the state.

Detective Inspector Dean Thomas said that he remains open to all possibilities in regards to the whereabouts of Freeman, seeing this bounty as "just another avenue" in the hunt.

Thomas described the reward as a "life-changing amount of money for anyone".

"While the offering of a reward for a murder investigation is not unusual in itself, what sets this apart is that this reward is for arrest and not conviction – and it is the largest reward ever offered for an arrest in Victoria," he said.

"This figure recognises the seriousness of this violent offending and our commitment to locating Freeman as soon as possible so that he is no longer a risk to the broader community.

"Our aim in offering this reward is that it will lead someone out there, who may not have been willing to come forward until this time, to contact police."

The record bounty comes as police enter their day 12 in their search for the alleged killer.

Despite hundreds of tip-offs, there have been no confirmed sightings.

Freeman is believed to be heavily armed as police continue to search over 100 properties and acres of bushland.

Police have previously stated that they believe some people might know his whereabouts or are potentially harbouring the alleged killer.

"This could be sightings of Freeman, information you're hearing in your local communities, even suspicious activity on your property – whatever it is, we want you to tell us," Thomas said.

"I would also like to stress to members of the public that if you see Freeman, then we need you to call triple zero immediately because this will give police the very best chance of apprehending him.

"Freeman has killed two people and injured a third, and it's immensely important that we can bring him into custody safely as soon as possible – hopefully this reward helps do just that."

Authorities remain open to the possibility that Freeman is still alive or could potentially be dead as a result of self-harm.

They hope this reward for information leading to his arrest will be an incentive.

More than 450 officers are dedicated to the search each day with "no talk" of reducing those numbers, Victoria Police said.

https://www.9news.com.au/national/victoria-police-announce-1m-bounty-for-capture-of-dezi-freeman/ef2db2a1-3da0-4904-8c64-044de0476fa6

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cJ1hozFz0W4

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122188

File: 03f19dd4d388347⋯.jpg (2.23 MB,4895x3263,4895:3263,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 6e7a9cb326fa8a6⋯.jpg (799.71 KB,3000x2000,3:2,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 69e0f0405f91427⋯.jpg (1.5 MB,3500x2334,1750:1167,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23555214 (061101ZSEP25) Notable: Video: ‘Real and likely risk of serious injury or death’ if neo-Nazi released, police say – Neo-Nazi leader Thomas Sewell has been charged with more than 20 offences, including assault and violent disorder, after allegedly directing National Socialist Network followers to attack people at Camp Sovereignty in Melbourne’s Kings Domain. Police told court the attack left a woman needing staples for a head wound, with others injured, and warned Sewell was almost certain to reoffend if granted bail. Prosecutors cited further violent incidents, including clashes in Bourke Street Mall and at anti-immigration rallies, while Sewell was already on bail for intimidating a police officer. Magistrate Donna Bakos will decide on bail on Friday.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109507 (pb)

>>122143

>>122148

>>122149

>>122150

‘Real and likely risk of serious injury or death’ if neo-Nazi released, police say

Erin Pearson - September 3, 2025

1/2

Neo-Nazi Thomas Sewell is likely to kill or seriously injure someone – or order one of his devoted followers to – unless he remains behind bars, police say.

Police allege Sewell is responsible for an attack on sacred Indigenous land that injured several people, as well as a string of other violent offences.

Detective Senior Constable Saer Pascoe told Melbourne Magistrates’ Court on Wednesday the 32-year-old from Balwyn, who leads the National Socialist Network, had complete control over a large contingent of members, who would attack others on his instruction and without hesitation.

Pascoe said Sewell had orchestrated an attack on people at Camp Sovereignty in Melbourne’s Kings Domain on Sunday that left one woman needing staples to secure a head laceration and others with minor wounds.

He said Sewell represented an unacceptable risk to the safety and welfare of the public if released on bail. The neo-Nazi was dramatically arrested outside Melbourne’s Magistrates Court on Tuesday, during a break in proceedings for a case in which he is accused of intimidating a police officer and his family last year. Sewell is representing himself in the matter.

“Although they present themselves as a self-political organisation, they have a documented history of hate crimes and acting with violence,” Pascoe said. “They also have a documented and recent history of violence incited and instructed by Thomas Sewell.

“He is their leader and has complete control.

“It’s almost certain the applicant will return to committing offences [if bailed]. There is a real and likely risk of serious injury or death.”

Pascoe said Sewell was unemployed, had recently been evicted from his Wantirna South home and was staying between a holiday campervan and his in-laws’ Balwyn home with his two young daughters, aged two and eight months.

He described the National Socialist Network as a neo-Nazi political organisation with white supremacist and anti-immigration ideology.

In addition to being charged over the Camp Sovereignty attack, Sewell is also facing fresh charges relating to the organisation’s August 9 event, in which police allege 200 neo-Nazis, led by Sewell, marched through the CBD and Bourke Street Mall dressed in black, carrying banners and chanting.

About 12.45am, police allege a man ran at Sewell and spat on the ground near him before punches were thrown. Other National Socialist Network members then knocked the victim to the ground, pulled away a bystander, and kicked the man in the head. The victim was taken to hospital. Sewell has been charged with assault and committing an indictable offence while on bail over the incident.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122189

File: ad02467998aa600⋯.jpg (183.28 KB,2048x1536,4:3,Clipboard.jpg)

File: d29c4c8eabfd3f0⋯.jpg (706.7 KB,2047x1536,2047:1536,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 6b017fd8ebc449c⋯.jpg (272.9 KB,2048x1537,2048:1537,Clipboard.jpg)

File: eb7c96f08ca2127⋯.mp4 (11.35 MB,960x540,16:9,Clipboard.mp4)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23555239 (061116ZSEP25) Notable: Video: ‘Endanger safety’: neo-Nazi will remain behind bars after alleged assault at Camp Sovereignty – Neo-Nazi leader Thomas Sewell has been denied bail after Melbourne Magistrates Court ruled his release posed a risk to public safety. Magistrate Donna Bakos said Sewell faced “serious” charges, including 21 counts of assault, violent disorder and affray, arising from an alleged unprovoked attack by 30 National Socialist Network members on Camp Sovereignty in Kings Domain. A young woman required staples for a head wound. Police told the court Sewell had “complete control” over his followers and a history of escalating violence, including an alleged assault during an August 9 march in Melbourne’s CBD.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122149

>>122150

>>122188

‘Endanger safety’: neo-Nazi will remain behind bars after alleged assault at Camp Sovereignty

Neo-Nazi Thomas Sewell will remain behind bars in custody after a court ruled that he was a risk to the “safety of others” if released on bail.

Clareese Packer - September 5, 2025

Neo-Nazi Thomas Sewell will remain behind bars in custody after he was denied bail over an alleged assault at a First Nations camp in Melbourne.

Magistrate Donna Bakos found there was a risk that Sewell could “endanger the safety and welfare of others” if released.

“People have the right to go about their lives without being confronted by hateful speech,” Ms Bakos told the Melbourne Magistrates Court on Friday morning.

She said the charges were “serious” and some “strike at the heart of a cohesive society”.

Sewell, 33, the leader of the National Socialist Network (NSN), was arrested after an alleged assault following the March for Australia anti-immigration rally.

Camp Sovereignty members at the sacred Indigenous site in Kings Domain were allegedly attacked by a group of about 30 men, led by Sewell, on August 31, with police alleging the attack was “unprovoked”.

“The NSN group was across the road … they ran some 30m up the hill to the camp,” Ms Bakos on Friday told the court of the allegations.

“At least three people were injured … one, a young woman, required staples to seal the wound to her scalp.”

Sewell was interviewed over the alleged assault and remanded in custody.

He was charged with 21 offences, including violent disorder, affray, seven charges of assault by kicking, five of discharge missile, and four of unlawful assault.

A court was earlier told he was unemployed but acted as the leader of the neo-Nazi political organisation NSN.

Ms Bakos emphasised that Sewell was not charged with any offences relating to his political views after arguments by his defence that the prosecutor’s evidence was a “political attack” on him.

The defence had argued there was “no evidence of a racially motivated ideology”, and this was merely a “contest of ideas”.

“It relates to charges for unlawful and violent conduct,” Ms Bakos said.

“Given the matters I have addressed, this application for bail must be refused.”

The court was told a police informant believed Sewell may not comply with bail conditions, and he had “complete control” over the NSN and “a large group of followers that will attack on his instruction without hesitation” at his disposal.

“The informant said that NSN members would also be put at risk by counter attacks by persons opposed to their views,” Ms Bakos said.

“(The informant believes) there is a real risk and likely risk of serious injury or death.”

The court was also told of police allegations that Sewell had engaged in behaviour “escalating in violence and in concerning behaviour” in recent times.

Police said this included an incident on August 9 in which Sewell allegedly assaulted a man during an NSN march in Melbourne’s CBD, a charge he also sought bail for on Friday.

It is alleged about 200 members of the NSN marched through Melbourne’s CBD about 12.30am, holding banners emblazoned with the words “white men fight back”.

Ms Bakos said Sewell was the only one from the large group not wearing a face covering.

The group were allegedly “chanting and holding up banners that depicted their ideology” when a man approached them and spat on the ground in Sewell’s direction.

The court was told Sewell then allegedly “raised his fists in a fighting stance” and lunged in the man’s direction, the pair trading blows after the man allegedly punched Sewell in the head.

The man was kicked in the head several times during the alleged incident and suffered cuts and abrasions to his face, the court was told.

Sewell was arrested on August 22 over the incident. He was released pending further inquiries and charged weeks later on September 2 with common law assault and committing an indictable offence while on bail.

https://www.news.com.au/national/victoria/courts-law/neonazi-thomas-sewell-denied-bail-over-alleged-assault-at-camp-sovereignty/news-story/75445225674283329833ce999f5aadbd

https://x.com/NoticerNews/status/1954157532840124826

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122190

File: ea0d3512b885a94⋯.mp4 (15.25 MB,640x360,16:9,Clipboard.mp4)

File: 0f85555ef4af941⋯.jpg (380.22 KB,2048x2048,1:1,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23555288 (061139ZSEP25) Notable: Video: Jacinta Nampijinpa Price ordered to remove flag in Senate chamber – Liberal senator Jacinta Nampijinpa Price was ordered to take off an Australian flag draped over her shoulders during a speech calling for flag burning to be criminalised, after Greens senator Nick McKim objected to her use of a “prop.” Nationals senator Bridget McKenzie defended her, while One Nation leader Pauline Hanson moved a motion urging parliament to outlaw desecration of the flag. Price, who also criticised the Indian community’s voting patterns during recent anti-immigration protests, said the flag symbolised gratitude, citizenship and national service, and condemned protesters for burning it in Melbourne.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122143

Jacinta Nampijinpa Price ordered to remove flag in Senate chamber

RHIANNON DOWN - September 03, 2025

Liberal Jacinta Nampijinpa Price was ordered in the Senate chamber to remove an Australian flag that was wrapped around her shoulders, in the middle of a speech calling for the burning of the national ensign to be criminalised.

Her push for the burning of the Australian flag to become a criminal offence was interrupted on Wednesday when Greens senator Nick McKim raised a point of order that Senator Price was using a prop as part of her address.

The Indigenous senator was ordered to remove the flag from her shoulders while she finished her speech to avoid “setting a ­precedent”.

The incident took place amid mounting pressure to criminalise the burning or destruction of the national flag, with One Nation leader Pauline Hanson moving a motion that a criminal offence be created.

Senator Price said the flag represented the nation’s history and symbolised “gratitude” for the good fortune to live in Australia. “Our national flag reminds us of the duty of responsible citizenship, doing something that’s bigger than ourselves,” she said.

“For example, raising a family, contributing to one’s community, working hard in a chosen field, or serving the nation in some ­capacity.

“When one understands the history behind our national flag, when one values its symbolic weight, it’s beyond comprehension that the burning of our ­national flag is not a criminal ­offence.

“Like most Australians, I was appalled by the footage of pro-Palestinian protesters burning our national flag in Melbourne on Sunday, the third of August.”

Senator McKim raised a point of order about Senator Price’s use of the flag during her speech as contravening standing orders that forbid props.

“I do want to make the point that if it’s OK for Senator Nampijinpa Price to wrap herself in this flag, I would intend to wrap myself in a Palestinian flag and come into the chamber and exercise the same rights that Senator Nampijinpa Price is currently exercising,” he said.

Nationals senator Bridget McKenzie interjected that the flag was not a prop, declaring that it “sits in our chamber right now”.

Senator Hanson moved her motion late on Wednesday, which called for the Senate to “take immediate action to make it an offence to wilfully burn or desecrate the Australian national flag”.

“Shamefully, there are people who know what the flag means to so many Australians, and that’s why they despise it,” Senator Hanson said.

“They despise our people and our nation for their stupid, narrow, hateful causes and for the symbolic value of our flag.

“They choose to desecrate it. They choose to burn it in our streets.”

Senator Price spoke in support of the motion, wearing a dress emblazoned with the Australian flag under her blazer.

The motion came just hours after Senator Price singled out the Indian community as being a source of concern during nation-wide anti-immigration protests on Sunday, declaring that Labor was leaning on the diaspora for votes.

“As we have seen, you yourself mentioned, that there is a concern with the Indian community, and only because there’s been large numbers, and we can see that reflected in the way the community votes for Labor at the same time,” she told the ABC’s Afternoon Briefing.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/jacinta-nampijinpa-price-ordered-to-remove-flag-in-senate-chamber/news-story/72755cc1a369cf9357478a4dd9ef7bb9

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122191

File: 73636a674d68bef⋯.mp4 (15.66 MB,640x360,16:9,Clipboard.mp4)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23555576 (061320ZSEP25) Notable: COMMENTARY: Trans lobby defends a lie that silences women – (Video) "Who could have imagined that the ordinary meaning of male and female would one day be put on trial, and that the very body created to defend women’s rights would argue that “female” is essentially meaningless? ... Yet that is exactly what is happening in the Giggle v Tickle case, in which Roxanne Tickle, a transgender woman, successfully sued the women-only social media app Giggle for Girls for excluding her, with the Federal Court finding this was unlawful indirect discrimination under the Sex Discrimination Act ... The case has gone to appeal and the Sex Discrimination Commissioner has intervened as a friend of the court, submitting that sex is “not a biological concept referring to whether a person at birth had male or female physical traits”... When Labor’s Susan Ryan introduced the Sex Discrimination Bill in 1983...the law was to give effect to the United Nations convention on the elimination of discrimination against women. These protections were grounded in biology and were designed to secure equality for women as a group ... In 2013, the act was amended and the definitions of man and woman were quietly repealed to accommodate protections for gender identity. Where the law once spelled out that a man was a member of the male sex and a woman was a member of the female sex, the federal parliament now said those words should take their “ordinary meaning”. It was presented as a technical change, but it was nothing of the sort. It was a Trojan horse wheeled inside the walls of the law. The effect has been to light a fire that now burns the city of meaning to the ground ... This has opened a door for the commissioner to argue that even the act’s pregnancy provisions - protections written precisely for biological women because of their capacity to conceive - should be read as extending to trans women ... In dissolving the boundary between sex and gender, the commissioner is engaging in institutional betrayal. The office created to defend women now seeks to erase them ... The commissioner seems determined to etch a dangerous precedent into law. Its staff may feel on the right side of history, but they are morally adrift. They are defending a lie - and no law or court can make it true." – Chris Uhlmann, The Australian

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109282 (pb)

>>109297 (pb)

>>109467 (pb)

>>109481 (pb)

COMMENTARY: Trans lobby defends a lie that silences women

CHRIS UHLMANN - September 05, 2025

1/3

Not all change is progress. Some of it is decay. Bad ideas do damage and, to borrow from Orwell, we live in an age where restating the obvious has become a civic duty.

So here goes: there is such a thing as binary sex. It is etched in your chromosomes and biology, and you cannot change it. Human beings are male or female. A vanishingly small number are intersex. That is a biological anomaly. It is not a third sex. We also use the words man and woman. That is gender. You can legally change your gender. If you wish to do so, good luck to you. No one should discriminate against you. But your rights are not the only rights, and when identity collides with reality in a plural society, compromise is unavoidable. As a general rule, the vast majority should not be forced to make profound changes to customs, laws and language to accommodate a tiny minority.

The legal right to change gender should not compel others to deny the reality of sex, because it is the definition of tyranny that you demand I sign up to a fantasy. Conceding that gender can be changed with nothing more than a form and a fee is a big enough leap. Conceding that sex is fluid is an assault on reason.

Giggle vs Tickle and a demand to deny reason

But the obvious is now being obscured. The concession to change the law on gender now leads to a demand to deny science. The activist playbook never changes: assert, extend, sanctify, silence. Sentiment overrules reason, and those who insist on fidelity to the truth are traduced. Who could have imagined that the ordinary meaning of male and female would one day be put on trial, and that the very body created to defend women’s rights would argue that “female” is essentially meaningless?

Yet that is exactly what is happening in the Giggle v Tickle case, in which Roxanne Tickle, a transgender woman, successfully sued the women-only social media app Giggle for Girls for excluding her, with the Federal Court finding this was unlawful indirect discrimination under the Sex Discrimination Act.

The case has gone to appeal and the Sex Discrimination Commissioner has intervened as a friend of the court, submitting that sex is “not a biological concept referring to whether a person at birth had male or female physical traits”.

“Nor is it a binary concept, limited to the ‘male’ or ‘female’ sex,” the commissioner’s submission argues. “The word ‘sex’ takes its ordinary meaning, which is informed by how that term is used throughout Australia including in state and territory legislation. ‘Sex’ can refer to a person being male, female, or another non-binary status. It is also broad enough to encompass the idea that a person’s ‘sex’ can be changed.”

The ordinary meaning of words is as old as the language itself, and the words “male” and “female” have carried stable, biologically rooted meanings in English for more than 600 years. Most Australians understand what those words mean and the Oxford Dictionary defines sex as “either of the main divisions (male and female) into which living things are placed on the basis of their reproductive functions”. By treating a legislative novelty a dozen years old as the measure of ordinary meaning, the commissioner has abandoned the highway of plain speech for a legal cul-de-sac of confusion.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122192

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23559317 (071108ZSEP25) Notable: Video: China criticises Canadian, Australian warships transiting Taiwan Strait – China’s military said it shadowed and warned the Canadian frigate HMCS Ville de Québec and Australian destroyer HMAS Brisbane as they transited the Taiwan Strait, denouncing the passage as “trouble-making and provocation” that raised security risks. Australia’s Defence Department said Brisbane’s September 6–7 transit was routine and in line with international law, alongside the Canadian ship, and vowed to keep exercising freedom of navigation under the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea. Canada said Ville de Québec was deployed under Operation Horizon to promote Indo-Pacific stability. Taiwan’s defence ministry said it monitored the passage to ensure security, while Beijing reiterated its claim that the strait forms part of its territorial waters.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

China criticises Canadian, Australian warships transiting Taiwan Strait

Ryan Woo - September 7, 2025

BEIJING, Sept 6 (Reuters) - China's military on Saturday said its forces had followed and warned a Canadian and an Australian warship, which were sailing through the sensitive Taiwan Strait, in a move it criticised as a provocation.

The People's Liberation Army's Eastern Theatre Command said the Canadian frigate Ville de Quebec and the Australian guided-missile destroyer Brisbane were engaged in "trouble-making and provocation".

"The actions of the Canadians and Australians send the wrong signals and increase security risks," it said.

An Australia Defence Department spokesperson said on Sunday that the Royal Australian Navy Hobart Class destroyer HMAS Brisbane conducted a routine transit through the Taiwan Strait from September 6 to 7 "in accordance with international law."

"The transit was conducted along with Royal Canadian Navy frigate HMCS Ville de Québec," the spokesperson said in a statement.

"Australian vessels and aircraft will continue to exercise freedom of navigation and uphold International Law, particularly United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea," the spokesperson added.

A spokesperson for the Canadian armed forces said they do not comment on sail plans for currently deployed ships.

The spokesperson added the Ville de Quebec is deployed as part of Operation Horizon, meant to promote peace and stability in the Indo-Pacific region.

Ville de Quebec was operating in the Philippine economic zone earlier this week, participating in freedom of navigation exercises, according to a Canadian government statement.

Taiwan's defence ministry said in a statement that it keeps a close watch on activity in the strait and "dispatches appropriate air and naval forces to ensure the security and stability" of the waterway, which separates Communist China from the democratic island of Taiwan.

The U.S. Navy and, on occasion, ships from allied countries including Canada, Britain and France transit the strait, which they consider an international waterway, around once a month. Taiwan also considers it an international waterway.

China, which views Taiwan as its own territory, says the strategic waterway is part of its territorial waters. Taiwan's government rejects Beijing's territorial claims.

China has over the past five years increased its military pressure on the island, including staging war games nearby.

https://www.reuters.com/world/china/china-criticises-canadian-australian-warships-transiting-taiwan-strait-2025-09-06/

https://www.globaltimes.cn/page/202509/1342793.shtml

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JRz8hZhDAlA

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122193

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23562518 (080947ZSEP25) Notable: Video: Thousands farewell police officer who tackled life to the fullest – Thousands gathered at the Victoria Police Academy to farewell Detective Leading Senior Constable Neal Thompson, who was killed alongside colleague Vadim de Waart-Hottart in Porepunkah. Partner Lisa Thompson recalled their final weekend together, saying he taught her “how brilliant life is, if you have the courage to try.” Sisters Lois Kirk and Diane Thompson described their brother as the family’s protector, while friend Jason Williams said his “Steve Irwin gene” defined a life of risk and adventure. Police chief commissioner Mike Bush hailed Thompson as “highly respected” and loyal, while colleagues honoured him with a kilometre-long guard of honour. Thompson, 59, was due to retire last week and planned to travel South America before his death.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109588 (pb)

>>122153

>>122185

>>122186

Thousands farewell police officer who tackled life to the fullest

Cameron Houston - September 8, 2025

1/2

Sergeant Lisa Thompson has vivid memories of the last weekend she spent with partner Neal Thompson, before he was gunned down with colleague Vadim de Waart-Hottart on a remote property in Porepunkah almost two weeks ago.

The couple spent that day tending to their hobby farm outside Wangaratta, when the man known as “Thomo” called her his “farmer’s wife”, and she told him he was the “best husband she never had”.

Together for almost a decade after they met at Wangaratta police station, Lisa Thompson said the couple spent their final Saturday evening together cooking, drinking wine, gazing at the stars and “leaving nothing unsaid”.

On Monday, she told a congregation of more than 3000 mourners at the Victoria Police Academy in Glen Waverley that Thompson had shown her and his step-children “how brilliant life is, if you have the courage to try”.

“He taught me how to love without fear and how to be brave when I’m scared. I am so grateful you did because I am scared. I don’t want to live this life without you and I don’t want to finish our dreams on my own,” she said.

“But I will, I promise. I will be brave. I will love you. I will honour you and I will cherish every moment I spent with you.”

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and Premier Jacinta Allan sat at the front of the packed chapel and listened to tributes from Lois Kirk and Diane Thompson, the sisters of the slain detective.

Kirk described her brother as the family’s hero and protector.

“One of the proudest days for Mum and Dad was when you graduated from the academy,” she said.

“You were their golden boy who could do no wrong ... the stories you told us about your job were harrowing and eye-opening in equal measures.”

Growing up near Bendigo in the 1970s, they recalled an adventurous and mischievous kid, who spent hours hunting animals and reptiles in the surrounding bush, or riding bikes with his mates.

Fellow police officer Jason Williams, a friend of 25 years, said a love of hunting and fishing was a constant theme in Thompson’s life.

The pair went on several adventures to Victoria’s High Country, Cape York in Queensland’s far north and the remote Kimberley region in Western Australia.

Williams said his best mate had a “Steve Irwin gene” and a nonchalant attitude towards personal safety, which often made him wonder if he needed to have a eulogy on standby.

Thompson was accidentally shot while hunting rabbits in his youth, overcame cancer and survived 17 car collisions and a stabbing while serving as a police officer.

“To be honest, I started writing this [eulogy] about 20 years ago on our first trip to the Top End, when he started walking in bare feet through long grass looking for a brown snake, or dragging six-foot sharks onto a 12-foot boat, or jumping waist deep into waters inhabited by crocodiles,” Williams said.

“But anyone who fished, hunted or climbed rocks with Thomo will tell you that he took more enjoyment watching one of his friends or their kids catching a fish, climbing a rock or shooting a deer than doing it himself.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122194

File: 91985fc041db726⋯.jpg (277.01 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 2a633924ead4ec2⋯.jpg (251.43 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 9fb5351f63115f4⋯.jpg (3.13 MB,1878x3101,1878:3101,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23562541 (081020ZSEP25) Notable: Beijing has post-parade tantrum at Australia over ‘incomprehensible’ Japan ties - China erupted over Penny Wong and Richard Marles’ Tokyo meeting with their Japanese counterparts, denouncing Australia’s strengthened partnership with Japan as “stirring up tensions” and “provoking China.” A China Daily editorial accused Canberra of parroting US “playbook” rhetoric, citing joint statements on Taiwan and Chinese activity in Japanese waters. Beijing also condemned Australia’s role in freedom of navigation exercises with the US, Canada and the Philippines and HMAS Brisbane’s Taiwan Strait transit, calling Canberra’s stance “incomprehensible.” The paper urged Anthony Albanese to heed Paul Keating’s warning that “Taiwan is not a vital Australian interest.” Wong and Marles also met Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba shortly before he announced his resignation, with Japan’s ruling LDP preparing to select his successor.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122162

>>122171

>>122173

>>122182

Beijing has post-parade tantrum at Australia over ‘incomprehensible’ Japan ties

WILL GLASGOW - September 8, 2025

Beijing has erupted over Penny Wong and Richard Marles’ “incomprehensible” decision to “provoke China” at a meeting on Friday with their Japanese counterparts in Tokyo two days after Xi Jinping oversaw the most intimidating display of military hardware in the 76-year history of the People’s Republic of China.

China’s outrage was delivered as the Pacific Islands Forum was preparing to meet in Solomon Islands amid a barely disguised tussle between Beijing and Canberra for influence in Australia’s near neighbourhood.

Beijing’s anger was sent in the lead editorial in Monday’s China Daily, following a pattern it has used since diplomatic relations with Australia have officially improved under the Albanese government.

“Japan and Australia have tried to depict their strengthened security co-operation as a meaningful move to maintain peace and stability in the Asia-Pacific,” the state-owned masthead editorialised.

“Yet what they have done by elevating their so-called special strategic partnership is actually stirring up tensions.”

The China Daily — Beijing’s most authoritative English language daily — said the Australian and Japanese senior ministers “did not stop at just parroting the hackneyed China-targeted phrases from the playbook of the United States”.

“They went further by seeking to provoke China on issues that concern its core interests,” the government-owned masthead said, noting that “the importance of peace and stability across the Taiwan Strait” and “serious concern at the increase in scale and frequency of provocative activities by China in Japan’s maritime and air domain” were both in the Australian and Japanese joint statement.

“Such remarks confuse right and wrong,” the Beijing mouthpiece declared.

“Japan and Australia are reneging on their formal recognition of Taiwan as part of China and degenerating into puppets on the geopolitical chessboard of the US that seems bent on playing the ‘Taiwan card’ to contain China.”

Australia and fellow “like minded” countries demoted their diplomatic representation for President Xi’s military parade last Wednesday, which was nominally held to mark 80 years since the defeat of imperial Japan and the end of World War Two.

Beijing used the parade, and a preceding meeting of the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation, to position China as the inheritor and champion its leadership role in the global order. Russian President Vladimir Putin and North Korean leader Kim Jong-un were Xi’s guests of honour for what China’s foreign ministry said was an event to support “peace and justice”.

While the parade was under way, an Australian navy vessel joined counterparts from Canada, the Philippines and the US for a freedom of navigation exercise in the Philippines’ exclusive economic zone. Beijing claims the waters as its own, despite losing an international arbitration in 2016.

A PLA spokesman and later the Chinese Foreign Ministry denounced the exercise. “We urge the relevant countries to stop forming small groupings and making trouble in the South China Sea and undermining regional peace and stability,” China’s Foreign Ministry spokesman Guo Jiakun said.

Beijing on Monday signalled its deep unhappiness with the pointedly timed exercise.

“[A]s if Australia thinks what it has done is not damaging enough to bilateral ties, it sent a guided-missile destroyer to sail through the Taiwan Strait,” the China Daily wrote.

“There is no fundamental conflict of interests between China and Australia, and the two countries have every reason to build on their vast common interests and expand their mutually beneficial pragmatic co-operation.

“It is thus incomprehensible that Canberra should implement a foreign policy that only serves the US’ geopolitical interests while ignoring all the negative consequences.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122195

File: 863b4c5701b7601⋯.jpg (183.71 KB,1280x720,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 74fa749e07272f6⋯.jpg (338.16 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23562544 (081028ZSEP25) Notable: Beijing says no’: Solomon Islands MP reveals how China pulls the strings - Anthony Albanese has arrived in Honiara for the Pacific Islands Forum amid claims that Solomon Islands Prime Minister Jeremiah Manele has acted under Beijing’s direction. United Party leader Peter Kenilorea says Manele froze him out after “the Chinese ambassador told him not to take me” into government. He was told he must “leave [his] party and give a press conference praising Beijing” and travel to China. Another MP, Daniel Waneoroa, was reportedly summoned by the Chinese embassy and “given the conditions on what he must do,” leading him to quit the pro-Taiwan Inter-Parliamentary Alliance on China. Critics warn Beijing is using such tactics to sideline Taiwan and cement control.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122155

‘Beijing says no’: Solomon Islands MP reveals how China pulls the strings

STEPHEN RICE - September 07, 2025

1/2

As Anthony Albanese joins regional leaders in Honiara this week for the Pacific Islands Forum, the Chinese government will be doing everything in its power to muscle in on the event, with new evidence that host nation Solomon Islands is taking orders directly from Beijing.

In a rare glimpse into Beijing’s naked interference in the rule of Pacific island nations, The Australian can reveal how China’s Solomon Islands embassy orchestrated moves to sideline prominent MPs critical of Beijing’s growing control over their country.

Prominent MP Peter Kenilorea recounts how pro-Beijing Prime Minister Jeremiah Manele, under direct instruction from China’s ambassador, froze him out of a place in the government.

The revelation exposes the stark reality of China’s ambitions in the region as it seeks to reshape the Pacific’s political landscape, marginalise Taiwan, and cement its dominance.

When Mr Albanese arrives at the Pacific Islands Forum in Honiara, he and the other leaders will be the guests of Mr Manele, who has been working assiduously to keep Taiwan out of the summit.

China’s corruption of Solomons Islands politics – often in the form of “constituency funds” paid directly to MPs – has been a fact of life for many years but even Mr Kenilorea, a veteran political leader, was stunned by what unfolded when he was summoned to the home of the Prime Minister after last year’s national election.

Mr Kenilorea, the son of Solomon Islands’ first prime minister, Sir Peter Kenilorea, is the leader of the United Party, the only party that has vowed to terminate Solomon Islands’ secretive 2022 security pact with China.

The outspoken former diplomat is also a member of the Inter-Parliamentary Alliance on China, a group of legislators from around the world demanding accountability from an increasingly authoritarian China.

When Mr Manele’s government came under threat during a no-confidence vote in parliament in May, Mr Kenilorea helped him stay in office, using his bloc of votes as head of the UP to prevent the even more rabidly pro-Beijing former prime minister Manasseh Sogavare returning to power.

Mr Kenilorea offered to join Mr Manele’s government, hoping to help steer it away from its pro-China stance.

But Beijing had other ideas, and its orders, says Mr Kenilorea, came directly from the Prime Minister.

“Right after the (no confidence) motion got withdrawn on the floor of parliament, Manele invited me to his house, his residence, and he just told me straight out that the Chinese ambassador told him not to take me,” Mr Kenilorea said.

“It is extraordinary, but it’s just the norm these days. I’d suspected that was the deal, but it was still shocking to hear the Prime Minister say that, too.”

Mr Kenilorea and Mr Manele had been long-time friends, serving together in New York at the Solomon Islands mission to the UN.

“We were the only Solomon Island families in New York, so I know him very well – his children call me uncle,” Mr Kenilorea said.

“So it was really, really weird to hear him say that the Chinese ambassador told him not to take me.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122196

File: 3c0ed345eddd402⋯.jpg (179.68 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: ca7b9619723cd8b⋯.jpg (333.18 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23562548 (081037ZSEP25) Notable: AI apps face $49.5m fine for creating fake nudes of Aussie students - Australia’s eSafety Commissioner has issued a formal warning to an overseas company running “nudify” apps that strip clothes from images, the first step toward a $49.5m fine. Commissioner Julie Inman Grant said the platforms were used “nefariously by Australian schoolchildren, to create deepfake image-based abuse of their peers” and marketed features like undressing “any girl” with “schoolgirl” and “sex mode” options. She warned the services are creating child sexual abuse material and causing “tremendous harm to young and teenage girls in schools every week.” Federal Communications Minister Anika Wells said the government will consult on new safeguards, as reports of fake images involving minors continue to rise.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109412 (pb)

>>109500 (pb)

>>109427 (pb)

AI apps face $49.5m fine for creating fake nudes of Aussie students

Time is ticking for a sinister fake nude app used by young school boys to strips clothes from the photos of teachers and female students.

Lachlan Leeming - September 8, 2025

Exclusive: The company behind “nudify” software, which can take photos of real people and remove their clothes to create “deepfake” pornographic images, has been targeted by Australia’s online safety watchdog, with a dire warning the tech has already infiltrated schoolyards across the country.

The Office of the eSafety Commissioner has confirmed a formal warning has been sent to an overseas-based tech company over its “nudify” apps, the first step to issuing a possible $49.5m fine, amid concerns the service is allowing the creation of child pornography.

The company – which has not been named by eSafety over concerns identifying it would attract more users – runs two of the world’s most-visited artificial intelligence (AI)-generated nude image websites, which allow users to upload photos of real people, including children.

The two services in Australia have 100,000 users per month, with eSafety saying the app was already being used to create sexually explicit deepfake images of Aussie schoolkids.

eSafety Commissioner Julie Inman Grant said reports to her office had shown the platforms were being used “nefariously by Australian schoolchildren, to create deepfake image-based abuse of their peers”.

“Shockingly, we found these services did little to deter the generation of synthetic child sexual abuse material by marketing alarming features such as undressing ‘any girl’, with options for ‘schoolgirl’ and ‘sex mode’, to name a few,” Ms Inman Grant said. “And while these platforms can be accessed for free, the cost to the children targeted is incredibly high, if not incalculable.”

Federal Communications Minister Anika Wells last week said the government would consult on ways to stop AI being used to create child abuse material in Australia, with Ms Inman Grant saying her office would use the powers already available to it to clamp down on the problem.

She added it was estimated nudify apps were making millions of dollars globally.

“These aren’t just harmless little developers having fun. This is an extremely lucrative business,” Ms Inman Grant said. “One says ‘give us the age of a child and a body type … and we’ll create a girl of your predilection’.

“It’s creating child sexual abuse (material).

“It’s causing tremendous harm to young and teenage girls in schools every week.”

The eSafety Commissioner’s office revealed in June that the number of fake, damaging images reported to its image-based abuse reporting line had soared – with the number of intimate, digitally-altered images featuring teens and children under 18 more than doubling in 18 months, compared to the seven years prior.

Ms Inman Grant warned it was likely the true number of school students impacted by fake images of them remained under-reported.

“We know that digitally-enabled harms are under-reported, so we are certain this is just the tip of the iceberg,” she said.

https://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/news/nsw/ai-porn-app-faces-495m-fine-for-creating-fake-nudes-of-aussie-students/news-story/65e56d5d8167eaaaba3bb134ce5ef589

https://www.esafety.gov.au/newsroom/media-releases/esafety-moves-against-services-used-to-nudify-australian-school-children

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122197

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23562564 (081054ZSEP25) Notable: Trump Renames DOD to Department of War - (Video) President Donald Trump has signed an executive order allowing the Pentagon to use “Department of War” as a secondary title, authorising Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and senior officials to adopt terms such as “Secretary of War” and “Deputy Secretary of War.” The White House said the change “conveys a stronger message of readiness and resolve.” Trump argued that while the U.S. won under the original War Department, later conflicts often ended in “a sort of tie.” Hegseth backed the move, saying, “we haven’t won a major war since,” and emphasised that “words matter,” pledging that the renamed department would fight decisively rather than become trapped in endless wars.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Trump Renames DOD to Department of War

Matthew Olay, Department of War - Sept. 5, 2025

President Donald J. Trump signed an executive order today changing the Defense Department's name to the Department of War as a secondary title.

The order — the 200th signed by the president since taking office — authorizes Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and DOD subordinate officials to use secondary titles like "Department of War," "Secretary of War" and "Deputy Secretary of War" in public communications, official correspondence, ceremonial contexts and non-statutory documents within the executive branch, according to a fact sheet released by the White House.

Additionally, the order directs all executive agencies and departments to "recognize and accommodate these secondary titles in internal and external communications," as well as instructing Hegseth to recommend actions — including executive and legislative actions — that would be required to permanently rename the department.

"The name 'Department of War' conveys a stronger message of readiness and resolve compared to 'Department of Defense,' which emphasizes only defensive capabilities," the fact sheet reads.

"Restoring the name 'Department of War' will sharpen the focus of this department on our national interests and signal to adversaries America's readiness to wage war to secure its interests," it continues.

Prior to signing the executive order, Trump said, "This is something [we've] thought long and hard about; we've been talking about it for months."

He added that, under the original War Department, the U.S. achieved military victories in both world wars; however, victories turned into more prolonged conflicts that often resulted in a "sort of tie" once the War Department rebranded as the Defense Department.

Hegseth concurred with Trump's contention.

"We changed the name after World War II from the Department of War to the Department of Defense and … we haven't won a major war since," Hegseth said.

"And that's not to disparage our warfighters … That's to recognize that this name change is not just about renaming, it's about restoring; words matter," he continued.

The secretary went on to say that the War Department would fight decisively to win and not get mired down in endless conflicts.

"Maximum lethality, not tepid legality; violent effect, not politically correct," he said.

The War Department was originally established by Congress on Aug. 7, 1789, the same year the Constitution took effect. It replaced the Board of War and Ordnance, which was created in 1776 during the Revolutionary War.

The War Department had oversight over the Army and Navy until 1798, when the Navy Department was formed.

The first secretary of war, a civilian position, was retired Army Gen. Henry Knox, who was appointed by President George Washington. Fort Knox, Kentucky, is named after him.

On Nov. 8, 1800, the War Department building in Washington burned down and with it, all of the department's records.

During the Civil War, the department was responsible for recruiting, training, supply, medical care, transportation and the pay of two million soldiers.

The War Department's name remained the same for over 150 years, until it merged with the Department of the Navy and the newly established Department of the Air Force to become the National Military Establishment with the passage of the 1947 National Security Act.

Famous War Department secretaries include James Monroe, who became president; John Calhoun, who became vice president; Jefferson Davis, who became president of the Confederate States; Ulysses S. Grant, a former Union general who became president; Robert Todd Lincoln, son of President Abraham Lincoln; and William Howard Taft, who became president and then chief justice of the Supreme Court.

https://www.war.gov/News/News-Stories/Article/Article/4295826/trump-renames-dod-to-department-of-war/

https://www.whitehouse.gov/fact-sheets/2025/09/fact-sheet-president-donald-j-trump-restores-the-united-states-department-of-war/

https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/09/restoring-the-united-states-department-of-war/

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=go9isUVk0JA

https://www.war.gov/

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122198

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23562572 (081104ZSEP25) Notable: Video: Donald Trump orders return to the US 'War Department - President Donald Trump has signed an executive order renaming the Pentagon as the “Department of War,” reviving the title it held until 1949. The White House said the move allows Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth and senior officials to use secondary titles such as “Secretary of War.” Trump described it as “an attitude … it’s really about winning,” while Hegseth, introduced by Trump under the new title, declared, “We’re going to go on the offence, not just on defence. Maximum lethality, not tepid legality.” Supporters in Congress have introduced legislation to make the change permanent, but critics warn it is costly and a distraction.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122197

Donald Trump orders return to the US 'War Department'

The US president’s latest effort to rebrand the military means the nation’s ‘Department of Defence’ will soon be the ‘Department of War’.

Phil Stewart and Trevor Hunnicutt - 06 Sep 2025

President Donald Trump has signed an executive order to rename the US defence department as the “Department of War”, reverting to a title it held until after World War II when officials sought to emphasise the Pentagon’s role in preventing conflict.

Trump’s move represents his latest effort to rebrand the US military, which has included his decision to preside over an extraordinary military parade in downtown Washington DC, and to restore the original names of military bases that were changed after racial justice protests in 2020.

Trump has also challenged conventional norms over domestic deployment of the US armed forces, creating military zones along the southern US border with Mexico to aid an immigration crackdown as well as deploying troops in cities like Los Angeles and Washington.

The order would authorise Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth and subordinate officials to use secondary titles such as “Secretary of War” and “Deputy Secretary of War” in official correspondence and public communications, according to a White House fact sheet.

“It’s a very important change, because it’s an attitude,” Trump said as he signed the executive order at a ceremony in the Oval Office. “It’s really about winning.”

The move would instruct Hegseth to recommend legislative and executive actions required to make the renaming permanent.

Department name changes are rare and have required congressional approval.

Still, Trump questioned whether he really needed a nod from Congress, even though his fellow Republicans hold slim majorities in both the Senate and House of Representatives.

Two Republican senators, Mike Lee of Utah and Rick Scott of Florida, and one Republican House member, Greg Steube of Florida, introduced legislation on Friday to make the change.

Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth, introduced as the Secretary of War by Trump, cheered the change, which he has long advocated.

“We’re going to go on the offence, not just on defence. Maximum lethality, not tepid legality,” Hegseth said.

The US Department of Defence was called the War Department until 1949, when Congress consolidated the Army, Navy and Air Force in the wake of World War II.

Historians say the name was chosen in part to signal that in the nuclear age, the US was focused on preventing conflict.

Changing the name again will be costly and require updating signs and letterheads used not only by officials at the Pentagon, but also military installations around the world.

An effort by former President Joe Biden to rename nine bases that honoured the Confederacy and Confederate leaders was set to cost the Army $US39 million ($A60 million).

Hegseth reversed that effort earlier in 2025.

Critics have said the planned name change is not only costly, but an unnecessary distraction for the Pentagon.

Hegseth has said that changing the name is “not just about words — it’s about the warrior ethos”.

https://7news.com.au/news/world/donald-trump-orders-return-to-the-us-war-department-c-19927825

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DVlLaSw3E4c

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122199

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23567080 (090910ZSEP25) Notable: Video: Albanese’s $500m Pacific security deal founders over China clause - Anthony Albanese has been forced to delay signing a $500m, 10-year treaty with Vanuatu after Prime Minister Jotham Napat resisted clauses limiting foreign funding for critical infrastructure, raising concerns it would restrict access to Chinese investment. The setback comes after Australia secured deals with Tuvalu and Nauru granting veto rights over security pacts with countries such as China. Albanese said “good progress” was made and more talks will follow, while critics questioned transparency over the funds. Analysts said the deal is not dead, though reaching consensus in Vanuatu may require compromises, as Canberra also pursues a landmark agreement with Papua New Guinea.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109547 (pb)

>>109557 (pb)

>>122155

Albanese’s $500m Pacific security deal founders over China clause

Matthew Knott - September 9, 2025

1/2

Australia’s bid to block China from gaining a security foothold in the Pacific through ports, airports and other sensitive critical infrastructure assets has been dealt a blow after Prime Minister Anthony Albanese was forced to scrap plans to sign a sweeping $500 million treaty-level agreement with Vanuatu.

Albanese hoped to kickstart a major fortnight of diplomacy in the Pacific by finalising a long-awaited deal with his counterpart during a visit to the capital of Port Vila on Tuesday, but resistance in Vanuatu meant the 10-year agreement had to be put back on ice at the last minute.

Vanuatu’s Prime Minister Jotham Napat said the key sticking point was that the pact, known as the Nakamal Agreement, could overly restrict Vanuatu’s ability to receive funding from other nations for critical infrastructure projects.

“Some of my ministers and my MPs feel it requires more discussion, particularly on some of the specific wordings in the agreement,” Napat said during a joint press conference with Albanese.

The setback is a blow for the Albanese government following its success at negotiating treaty-level agreements with Tuvalu and Nauru that grant Australia defacto veto rights over any security and military agreements with countries including China.

Government sources, speaking on condition of anonymity, said the wording in the Vanuatu agreement was less explicit than for Nauru or Tuvalu, prompting fears it could unduly limit overseas investment in infrastructure projects in Vanuatu.

Beijing funded a new presidential palace for Vanuatu last year and welcomed the Melanesian nation’s “active participation” in its Belt and Road infrastructure initiative, raising concerns in Canberra about deepening ties with China.

Defence Minister Richard Marles, Foreign Minister Penny Wong and Pacific Minister Pat Conroy participated in a lavish ceremony on a volcano in Vanuatu in August to celebrate the apparent conclusion of negotiations on the agreement, heightening expectations it would be signed imminently.

Marles declared at the time that the pact would “transform the relationship between our two countries”, adding that Albanese and Napat were hoping to finalise the agreement “in the coming weeks”.

Albanese said he and Napat “made good progress” during their meeting on Tuesday and would keep working towards striking an agreement.

“Both sides will go through our processes, but we’re very confident that the agreement can be reached, and I’m reassured by the discussion I’ve had with the prime minister,” Albanese said.

“This is in the interests of both our nations and is a very positive agreement going forward.”

Albanese will give Napat a lift to the Pacific Island Forum in the Solomon Islands on Wednesday, allowing the pair more time to discuss the deal.

Opposition foreign affairs spokeswoman Michaelia Cash said it was disappointing that Albanese had not been able to finalise a deal with Vanuatu.

“With an agreement still being pursued, Australians deserve clarity on how the half a billion dollars of taxpayer money will be spent and how it will deliver lasting benefits for both Vanuatu and Australia,” she said.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122200

File: 2ddbef758820740⋯.jpg (953.01 KB,2333x2333,1:1,Clipboard.jpg)

File: a94cc4cc6a8ac4e⋯.jpg (670.76 KB,2266x2832,1133:1416,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23567096 (090932ZSEP25) Notable: COMMENTARY: Beijing scores a win in Vanuatu, as $500m deal hangs in balance - "Australia has been left bloodied and bruised after its latest diplomatic bout with China in the Pacific… The Albanese government had hoped to seal another win against Beijing by signing a new economic and security agreement with Vanuatu… ‘Some of my ministers and my MPs … feel it requires more discussions, particularly on some of the specific wordings in the agreement when it comes to the critical infrastructure,’ Prime Minister Jotham Napat said… It’s the second time Vanuatu has gotten cold feet over a security-related agreement with Australia… Beijing has won this round. But the competition continues." - Ben Packham, The Australian

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109547 (pb)

>>122155

>>122199

COMMENTARY: Beijing scores a win in Vanuatu, as $500m deal hangs in balance

BEN PACKHAM - 9 September 2025

Australia has been left bloodied and bruised after its latest diplomatic bout with China in the Pacific.

The Albanese government had hoped to seal another win against Beijing by signing a new economic and security agreement with Vanuatu.

It had high hopes of success just weeks earlier, when Richard Marles, Penny Wong and Pacific Minister Pat Conroy initialled the Nakamal Agreement with counterparts from Vanuatu on the edge of an active volcano.

But Beijing’s embassy in Port Vila has been hard at work since then, plying its influence with members of Prime Minister Jotham Napat’s coalition government.

The Australian side knew the deal was looking shaky before Anthony Albanese boarded his VIP jet to Vanuatu on Tuesday morning.

He decided to make the trip anyway, hoping his personal touch could help seal the agreement.

But his counterpart was clear: the deal as it stands is a non-starter.

“Some of my ministers and MPs … feel it requires more discussions, particularly on some of the specific wordings in the agreement when it comes to the critical infrastructure,” Napat said.

He responded with a brief “yes” when asked if Vanuatu was concerned the agreement would limit infrastructure funding from other countries.

Of course, there’s only one country he could be referring to.

A clause in the proposed agreement would give Australia a veto against investment by any other country (ie. China) in Vanuatu’s critical infrastructure sectors, such as ports, airports and telecommunications.

In return, Vanuatu would get an extra $500m over a decade for economic development and climate resilience projects.

That’s big money in the Pacific, but not enough to send China packing.

Vanuatu owes Chinese lenders an estimated $US100m for an array of big-ticket projects, including a new presidential palace, parliament building, major port, roads projects, sports stadium and convention centre.

The mixing of business and politics in Vanuatu, as elsewhere in the Pacific, offers Beijing additional sway over Vanuatu’s elites.

Albanese says he is confident the agreement will be finalised soon. But he’d be wise not to hold his breath.

It’s the second time Vanuatu has gotten cold feet over a security-related agreement with Australia.

A similar deal, signed in 2022 but not ratified, sparked a political crisis that led to the fall of the country’s then-prime minister, Ishmael Kalakaua.

Napat wanted to avoid the same fate.

Albanese can take heart, though, in recent and coming wins elsewhere in the region.

Agreements with Tuvalu and Nauru have firmly placed them in Australia’s orbit, giving Canberra veto rights over their security relationships with other countries.

And a bilateral defence treaty to be signed next week with Papua New Guinea will establish the countries as bona fide allies with mutual obligations to support each other in the event of a conflict.

That’s on top of Australia’s $600m deal to support a PNG side to play in the NRL – a commitment no sane leader of that country would jeopardise by getting too close to Beijing.

As Penny Wong declared last year, Australia is in a “state of permanent contest” with China in the Pacific.

Beijing has won this round. But the competition continues.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/commentary/beijing-scores-a-win-in-vanuatu-as-500m-deal-hangs-in-balance/news-story/4add929bdc719033aa5267e906cd6c1d

https://x.com/pmc_gov_au/status/1965305167131070744

https://x.com/AlboMP/status/1965284479133700361

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122201

File: 4b2b3caaa04498b⋯.jpg (286.6 KB,1215x811,1215:811,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 931edffe52588a7⋯.jpg (3.33 MB,3000x2000,3:2,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23567101 (090943ZSEP25) Notable: OPINION: China and Australia in a high-speed race to win control of the Pacific - "Constantly seeking opportunities to establish itself as the dominant power in the Pacific, Beijing decided to offer a fleet of 27 brand-new vehicles as a gift to Solomon Islands… The Australian response? To announce that it would give the Solomons a fleet of 60 brand-new vehicles… This is the new reality. It’s a daily competition, hand-to-hand diplomatic combat… There are some bidding wars that Australia cannot win… But this is a daily contest in a permanent struggle across a vast expanse of what the regional nations call the Blue Pacific Continent. China is intent on establishing military bases in the Pacific and will not rest until it succeeds. The region that Australia long thought was the least important is now accepted as the most important." - Peter Hartcher, The Age

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109558 (pb)

>>109547 (pb)

>>122155

>>122195

>>122199

OPINION: China and Australia in a high-speed race to win control of the Pacific

Peter Hartcher - September 9, 2025

1/2

If you want to know how China and Australia are competing for influence in the Pacific Islands, here’s a microcosm of the contest.

Constantly seeking opportunities to establish itself as the dominant power in the Pacific, Beijing decided to offer a fleet of 27 brand-new vehicles as a gift to Solomon Islands in time for its hosting this week of the annual summit of the region’s paramount political gathering, the Pacific Islands Forum. The 18-member forum includes Australia and New Zealand. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese will be there.

The purported function of the vehicles? The 27 SUVs were to ferry the various leaders and ministers around during the summit. It might not sound like a big deal, but for a tiny nation with a per-capita income in the same range as that of Haiti and the Congo, the prime minister himself, Jeremiah Manele, turned out for the handover.

The Australian response? To announce that it would give the Solomons a fleet of 60 brand-new vehicles. “Australia continues to be the Pacific’s largest development partner, and security partner of choice,” Minister for Foreign Affairs Penny Wong said in jointly announcing the gift, together with Pacific Island Affairs Minister Pat Conroy.

Unspoken is that Canberra doesn’t want any of the leaders to travel in China’s cars because they are inevitably set up to spy for Beijing. The Australian aim is that the forum leaders are chauffeured around in the cars from Canberra. After this week’s events, the Australian cars are to be distributed across various islands of the Solomons for police use.

For good measure, the Australian government is throwing in support for the Solomons’ cybersecurity, upgrades to roads around the capital of Honiara, and $3 million for logistics support for the PIF summit.

This is the new reality. It’s a daily competition, hand-to-hand diplomatic combat. Sometimes literally. One of Beijing’s cultural gifts to the Solomons is a program in which Chinese police instructors teach kung fu classes to local kids. The Solomons media call it “kung fu diplomacy”.

When you hear ministers or experts speak of abstract “strategic competition”, this is what it looks like in action in the Pacific.

In some cases, Australia woke up too late. It was the Solomons that dealt Australia its Pacific shock. That was the day in the Scott Morrison years when we woke up to learn that China had struck a security pact with Honiara.

The very islands that a hostile Imperial Japanese Army occupied to cut off Australia’s economic and military lifelines in WWII were falling under the influence of China.

It took a vast and bloody effort by the US, Australia, New Zealand and the UK to dislodge the Japanese from the Solomons in the battle for the island of Guadalcanal. That campaign cost the allies 29 ships sunk, 615 aircraft destroyed and more than 7000 troops killed.

By the time in 2022 that Canberra was shocked out of its complacency, Beijing had not only signed a security pact with the Solomons. Its agents had been offering bags of cash to Solomons’ politicians to look more favourably on China.

How do we know? Because the then-deputy leader of the opposition, Peter Kenilorea Jr, said publicly that China offered MPs the equivalent of between about $300,000 and $900,000 to lend their support to Beijing. The premier of Malaita Province, Daniel Suidani, said he’d been offered the equivalent of around $150,000.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122202

File: fb0618fbb05d0af⋯.jpg (1.31 MB,5000x3333,5000:3333,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 731e77fe041194d⋯.jpg (3.28 MB,5000x2811,5000:2811,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23567113 (090953ZSEP25) Notable: Victoria becomes first Australian state to formally table treaty legislation in parliament - Victoria has introduced historic treaty legislation establishing Gellung Warl, a new authority making permanent the First Peoples’ Assembly. The bill promises to “reckon with the past” while assuring it takes nothing from the broader community. Gellung Warl will oversee decision-making on policies affecting First Peoples, continue the Yoorrook Commission’s truth-telling, and receive permanent funding. Co-chairs Ngarra Murray and Rueben Berg said it would “reshape the story” and “reset the relationship.” Premier Jacinta Allan said it puts decision-making power into Aboriginal hands. The Coalition vowed to oppose the bill, likening it to the Voice referendum, but with Greens and minor parties backing it, the legislation is expected to pass, making Victoria the first state to embed treaty in law.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Victoria becomes first Australian state to formally table treaty legislation in parliament

Richard Willingham - 9 September 2025

1/2

Victoria's historic treaty is promising to "reckon with the past" and empower the state's First Peoples — and explicitly declares it will not take anything away from the broader community.

The treaty legislation was tabled in parliament on Tuesday afternoon and if passed, will make permanent the First Peoples' Assembly under a new authority called Gellung Warl.

The assembly, which was set up in 2019 to elect Aboriginal people to negotiate a treaty on their behalf, will have the power to make rules on matters that directly affect First Peoples in Victoria.

"Treaty is built on a simple principle: First Peoples decide First Peoples' issues. This doesn't take anything away from anyone else,'' the treaty says.

It also says: "The State has made the commitment to Treaty because when First Peoples thrive, all of Victoria is stronger, fairer, and more whole. Treaty is not a gift given, but a commitment made — to practical change, to shared progress, and to a future in which dignity and opportunity belong to all."

"We know already governments are spending huge amounts of money seeking to close the gap … but it's not working," Ms Allan said.

The mechanics of the bill, she said, would reflect in-principle agreements the state government had already reached with the First Peoples' Assembly through treaty negotiations.

"It puts into the law the changes that will give Aboriginal people a say about how services and programs that are for Aboriginal Victorians are run," Ms Allan said.

Co-chair of the First Peoples' Assembly of Victoria Ngarra Murray said today marked "a new era".

"Treaty offers us a chance to reshape the story of this country," she said.

Her co-chair, Rueben Berg, said the treaty bill would "reset the relationship" between First Peoples and the state government.

"Under treaty, government must speak with us when making laws, rules or policies about us," he said.

New authority would continue truth-telling work

Gellung Warl will also include two extra bodies to hold the government to account and to continue the truth-telling work of the Yoorrook Justice Commission.

The negotiated treaty requires a formal apology from the state government to the First Peoples of Victoria.

Victoria's primary and secondary students will also learn more about Victoria's First Peoples, with a new curriculum to be developed for prep to year 10 students, using the findings of the Yoorrook Commission.

The Gellung Warl will be futureproofed with a special appropriation act to be set up by parliament, with the body to receive tens of millions of dollars a year once fully operational.

Among its other roles will be to oversee consultation with all state-funded bodies, including police, when rules and policies are developed relating to First Peoples.

"The injustices that began with colonisation — dispossession, racism, and discrimination — continue to shape the lives of First Peoples today,'' the Treaty says.

"Treaty is the next step through that door. It is not about dwelling in the past, nor laying blame. It is about acknowledging that the past still shapes the present and choosing to do better from here."

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122203

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23567129 (091003ZSEP25) Notable: Video: Victorian students from age four to year 10 to learn colonisation history - Victorian students from prep to year 10 will learn colonisation history through curriculum shaped by the Yoorrook Justice Commission’s Truth be Told report. The treaty bill says content will be co-designed with Gellung Warl, a new permanent authority embedding the First Peoples’ Assembly, alongside education authorities and Aboriginal organisations, with final approval by the minister. Premier Jacinta Allan said it is “about ensuring that future generations understand the history of this great state” and that “understanding history is about moving forward together.” The bill also proposes renaming places in Aboriginal languages and creates a watchdog to oversee compliance with Closing the Gap commitments.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122202

Victorian students from age four to year 10 to learn colonisation history

PAIGE TAYLOR and ANTHONY GALLOWAY - 9 September 2025

Victorian children as young as four will learn the state’s history from the start of colonisation as described in the Truth be Told report of the Yoorrook Justice Commission, the official public record of the truth-telling hearings held from 2022 to 2024.

The treaty bill introduced to the Victorian parliament on Tuesday says “the state will use the Yoorrook Justice Commission Official Public Record as a resource to support the implementation of truth-telling in the Victorian Curriculum” for children from foundation – the year a child begins prep – to year 10.

Part one of the Truth be Told report begins with the words: “We walk on stolen land: a truth etched into the soil, in the rivers that have carried stories of a people for millennia, and in the skies that have witnessed it all. The scars of colonial invasion, its massacres, violence and relentless erasure are not confined to the past. They reside in the present, shaping the lives of First Peoples in Victoria today.”

The treaty bill gives ultimate authority to the state education minister for curriculum content and says, subject to the minister’s approval, the truth-telling elements of the curriculum will be co-designed by the new representative body for Victoria’s First Peoples, called Gellung Warl, the Victorian Curriculum and Assessment Authority, the Victorian Aboriginal Education Association Incorporated and the department.

Victorian Premier Jacinta Allan said the plan was “about ensuring that future generations understand the history of this great state”.

“It should be a matter of pride. It should be taught in our schools that we are home to the longest continuous culture on the planet,” Ms Allan said.

“We know that post-colonisation some of that history has been incredibly challenging to hear because of the impacts of colonisation in those early days, and also how that has endured.

“So understanding that history is just fundamental to how we move forward.

“So that is why it has to be embedded in our schooling curriculum, because … understanding history is about moving forward together to get the better outcomes.”

As revealed by The Australian on Tuesday, Victoria’s new voice-like body will have legislative backing to make statewide rules about who can and cannot claim to be Aboriginal, creating centralised and uniform authority that could end self-identification in government jobs and even lead to prosecution of frauds.

The statewide treaty bill is the result of the Victorian government’s decade-long negotiation with the First Peoples Assembly of Victoria.

The process was bipartisan until January 2024, when the state opposition withdrew its support.

The treaty sets out a process to rename Victorian places in the language of Aboriginal Victorians.

It also establishes a watchdog that will monitor and audit how government departments are or are not meeting their commitments to the Closing the Gap national agreement.

This is a requirement of the national agreements signed by all states and territories in 2020, although Victoria is the first state to do it.

“What I would hope, as we take this incredibly important bill through the Victorian parliament, is that our political opponents, or indeed opponents to this bill, do not go down the path that we saw in 2023,” Ms Allan said in a press conference on Tuesday.

“A path of deliberate misinformation, at times there were outright lies being peddled about what this actually was.

“What treaty is about here in Victoria is about working with Aboriginal families, understanding at its core that families can get better outcomes when they have a say.

“This is a moment that the opposition have to grasp to drive better change for Aboriginal Victorians because we all benefit as a society.

“And I still hold out a little bit of hope that they might find it in their hearts, but also importantly in their heads.”

Ms Allan said the key difference between the new body in Victoria and the voice was that the Victorian model would not be constitutionally enshrined.

“You’ve identified the key difference,” she said. “But how it will bring change is that it will be a requirement under law for governments, for agencies, for departments to not just listen, but actively consult and then be held to account.”

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/victorian-students-from-age-four-to-year-10-to-learn-colonisation-history/news-story/6917b818ad932b8daa83ed8f195e9d8d

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tV50hZDt9IU

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122204

File: 8dc687e9a2478c2⋯.jpg (147.36 KB,1620x1080,3:2,Clipboard.jpg)

File: d353afabbf4ac9c⋯.jpg (4.28 MB,3000x2000,3:2,Clipboard.jpg)

File: e71b858fd54ecc6⋯.jpg (341.34 KB,937x1418,937:1418,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23567180 (091036ZSEP25) Notable: Big changes made to Epstein accuser’s memoir after family complains - The publisher of Virginia Giuffre’s posthumous memoir Nobody’s Girl has altered the text after her family said it presented an “unduly positive portrait” of her marriage, which ended before her death in April. Knopf worked with Virginia's brothers and their wives to “contextualize the narrative,” adding a foreword by collaborator Amy Wallace noting changes in Giuffre’s life since 2024. Publisher Jordan Pavlin said the book remains “a testament to Virginia’s dignity and fortitude.” Family members also joined Epstein survivors at a Capitol Hill press conference urging release of sex-trafficking files and rejecting Donald Trump’s claim the case is a “hoax.”

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109289 (pb)

>>109474 (pb)

>>109582 (pb)

Big changes made to Epstein accuser’s memoir after family complains

Virginia Giuffre’s book Nobody’s Girl will come out in October

Hillel Italie - 04 September 2025

1/2

The publisher of Virginia Giuffre’s posthumous memoir, Nobody’s Girl, has reached an agreement on a final draft with her family, following their public objections to its initial content.

Surviving relatives of the Jeffrey Epstein accuser had expressed concerns that the book presented an “outdated and unduly positive portrait” of her marriage, which ended in the months leading up to her death by suicide in April.

Jordan Pavlin, Knopf’s publisher and editor-in-chief, confirmed the resolution in a statement Wednesday.

“We worked with Virginia’s brothers and their wives to contextualize the narrative Virginia’s memoir presents, and we appreciate their support of this publication,” he said.

“We all believe that Virginia’s voice must be heard, and that her courage in telling her story has the power to offer strength and hope to victims of sexual abuse.

“Nobody’s Girl is a testament to Virginia’s dignity and fortitude in the face of Jeffrey Epstein’s and Ghislaine Maxwell’s monstrous cruelty. Its impact will be profound.”

A spokesperson for Giuffre's family did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

In August, Alfred A. Knopf announced that Nobody’s Girl would come out October 21 and called the book a “riveting and powerful story of an ordinary girl who would grow up to confront extraordinary adversity.”

Family members soon issued a statement saying that Nobody's Girl, which reportedly presents her marriage to Robert Giuffre as part of her healing process, “will undermine Virginia’s credibility as someone who consistently told the truth in her pursuit of justice and accountability.”

The final edition, which Knopf has sent to the printers, includes a foreword that outlines the changes in Giuffre's life since the manuscript was completed in fall 2024.

Knopf and her family had spent months working on the language for the foreword, written by Giuffre's collaborator, the author and journalist, Amy Wallace.

Giuffre originally signed in 2023 with Penguin Press, in what Knopf spokesman Todd Doughty said recently was a seven-figure deal.

She moved from Penguin to Knopf along with her acquiring editor, Emily Cunningham, who joined Knopf in 2024. Both Knopf and Penguin are part of Penguin Random House.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122205

File: ed58d0c0c5a3c90⋯.jpg (173.15 KB,852x376,213:94,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 4a7ac66d74092c2⋯.jpg (335.55 KB,825x674,825:674,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 53a9f784f5bd311⋯.jpg (322.52 KB,852x725,852:725,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23567187 (091039ZSEP25) Notable: Q Post #4923 - https://twitter.com/VRSVirginia/status/1319071346282778624 - Dearest Virginia - We stand with you. Now and always. Find peace through prayer. Never give up the good fight. God bless you. Q - https://qanon.pub/#4923 - https://qanon.pub/#4568

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122204

2/2

Earlier Wednesday, some Giuffre family members joined dozens of survivors of Epstein's abuse at a news conference on Capitol Hill in Washington, where they called on lawyers to release files of the sex trafficking investigation into the late financier and rejected President Donald Trump’s effort to dismiss the issue as a “hoax.”

“No leniency, no deals, no special treatment,” Sky Roberts, Giuffre's brother, said at the conference. “The Epstein documents must be unsealed."

Doughty has confirmed that Nobody's Girl mentions Trump, who once employed Giuffre at his private Mar-a-Lago club in Florida, but added that he is not accused of any wrongdoing. The publisher has otherwise declined to offer specifics on anyone else named.

Giuffre had contended she was caught up in Epstein’s sex-trafficking ring in the 2000s and was exploited by Britain’s Prince Andrew and other influential men.

Epstein was found dead in a New York City jail cell in 2019 in what investigators described as a suicide. His former girlfriend, Ghislaine Maxwell, was convicted in late 2021 on sex trafficking and other charges.

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/epstein-ghislaine-virginia-giuffre-memoir-b2819919.html

https://www.penguinrandomhouse.com/books/712958/nobodys-girl-by-virginia-roberts-giuffre/

Q Post #4923

Oct 21 2020 20:55:05 (EST)

https://twitter.com/VRSVirginia/status/1319071346282778624

Dearest Virginia -

We stand with you.

Now and always.

Find peace through prayer.

Never give up the good fight.

God bless you.

Q

https://qanon.pub/#4923

https://qanon.pub/#4568

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122206

File: 38b055a771a892b⋯.mp4 (1.25 MB,1024x576,16:9,Clipboard.mp4)

File: 680e269a8bdf2f5⋯.jpg (340.36 KB,1616x1080,202:135,Clipboard.jpg)

File: a9cdccc484b65d4⋯.jpg (1.3 MB,5000x3333,5000:3333,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23571695 (100924ZSEP25) Notable: Video: Two men charged over antisemitic attacks at Allawah synagogue, Maroubra and Dover Heights - NSW Police have charged two men over a string of antisemitic incidents, including graffiti on an Allawah synagogue, a Maroubra childcare centre that was later set alight, and a Dover Heights home once occupied by Jewish leader Alex Ryvchin. Cars were also torched on the same street. A 27-year-old has been charged with directing and participating in a criminal group, while a 26-year-old faces charges including displaying a Nazi symbol and damaging property. The arrests follow ASIO’s recent disclosure that Iranian operatives directed separate firebombings, prompting the government to expel Iran’s ambassador and move to designate the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) as a terror group.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109251 (pb)

>>109584 (pb)

Two men charged over antisemitic attacks at Allawah synagogue, Maroubra and Dover Heights

abc.net.au - 10 September 2025

Police have charged the alleged mastermind and an accomplice who they say orchestrated and carried out a series of antisemitic attacks across Sydney this year.

The two men have been charged over graffiti depicting a swastika on an Allawah synagogue on January 10 and similar incidents at a childcare centre in Maroubra and a home in Dover Heights.

Days after the incident at Allawah, the Maroubra childcare centre was set alight after being vandalised.

A nearby school in Maroubra was also graffitied with offensive messaging.

The school declined to comment when contacted and the ABC has reached out to the Allawah synagogue and Maroubra daycare centre.

The graffiti in Dover Heights was on a home formerly occupied by Jewish Australian Executive Council of Australian Jewry co-chief executive Alex Ryvchin.

Four cars were also torched on the same street, police said.

At the time both Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and NSW Premier Chris Minns condemned the acts targeting Mr Ryvchin.

The ABC contacted Mr Ryvchin, who did not wish to comment on the latest development.

NSW Police said counterterrorism detectives under Strike Force Pearl charged the two men in June and July this year.

Police allege a 27-year-old man orchestrated the attacks and has been charged with directing a criminal group and participating in a criminal group.

A 26-year-old man, who police allege committed the attacks under the instruction of the older man, has been charged with knowingly displaying a Nazi symbol, destroying or damaging property in company and participating in a criminal group.

The men will front the Downing Centre Local Court next month.

ASIO revealed in August that intelligence pointed to the involvement of Iranian operatives in two antisemitic attacks on Australian soil.

Director-general of ASIO, Mike Burgess, at the time said Iran directed the firebombings of Lewis' Continental Kitchen in Bondi and a Melbourne synagogue last October and December respectively.

While not singling out the incidents in Allawah, Maroubra and Dover Heights at the time, the government said it suspected Iran was behind other incidents of antisemitism.

The move prompted the government to expel the Iranian ambassador and prepare legislation to class Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) as a terror group.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-09-10/nsw-two-men-charged-antisemitic-incidents-sydney/105758474

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122207

File: 3e09f85cb4bc953⋯.jpg (1.62 MB,4000x2667,4000:2667,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23571701 (100928ZSEP25) Notable: Police bracing for violence in Melbourne CBD, as four protests planned for Saturday - Victoria Police are preparing a large-scale operation in Melbourne’s CBD on Saturday, with four rallies set to overlap, raising the risk of clashes between far-right and far-left activists. Events include a “Rally against racism,” “Sovereignty never ceded,” an anti-government protest, and the anti-immigration “Save Australia” rally. Superintendent Troy Papworth warned some participants “seek conflict and confrontation,” citing the violent August 31 march led by 150 National Socialist Network members. Police will deploy specialist squads, enforce weapon searches, and prioritise protecting Camp Sovereignty, which neo-Nazis attacked last month.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122143

Police bracing for violence in Melbourne CBD, as four protests planned for Saturday

Alexander Darling - September 10, 2025

Police are preparing another massive operation in Melbourne’s CBD, where four separate protests could lead to far-left and far-right activists facing off against each other.

Saturday’s planned rallies – which include nationalist, anti-government and anti-racism protests – will come after violence exploded at an anti-immigration march nearly two weeks ago.

Specialist police squads, including the public order response team, will be deployed and officers will have the power to search people for weapons and direct them to remove face coverings.

The “Rally against racism” is scheduled to start near Flinders Street Station at 11am to support migrants and protest the attack on Camp Sovereignty, a sacred Indigenous site in Southbank, by neo-Nazis after the March for Australia rally on August 31.

At the same time, another rally called “Sovereignty never ceded” – part of a national day of action against racism and the Camp Sovereignty attack – is planned for the corner of Flinders and Swanston streets.

An hour later, the “Australia unites against government corruption” rally and the anti-immigration “Save Australia” rally are set to start simultaneously outside Parliament House on Spring Street.

Police said they had intelligence that some among the groups would “seek conflict and confrontation”, as occurred on August 31 when anti-immigration and counter-protesters clashed repeatedly.

In a statement on Wednesday morning, police said their role was to “maintain public order and prevent breaches of the peace”.

“Anyone who is attending these events to cause trouble or behave violently can expect to be arrested,” police said.

At a press conference, Superintendent Troy Papworth said some people had attended the March for Australia rally specifically to incite violence.

“We saw people two weeks ago wearing motocross armor in the CBD,” he said. “Clearly, they’re not here for lawful and peaceful protest.

“We’ve had enough of people using protest as an excuse to come to the city and commit violence against each other. It is simply not on.”

Twenty people have been charged over last month’s march and are now banned from the CBD.

The CBD has been declared a designated area, giving police the power to search people for weapons and direct them to remove face coverings.

Papworth said police officers at the rally were being called in from across the state, some on their days off.

“In the last two weeks we’ve had funerals for two of our fallen comrades,” he said, referring to the shooting deaths of Detective Leading Senior Constable Neal Thompson and Senior Constable Vadim de Waart-Hottart in Porepunkah.

“These are police that should be resting... reconnecting with the family in light of what has been a terrible tragedy for Victoria Police. But they know this is the right thing to do, and they’re coming in on their days off to make sure that the community is safe.”

The man accused of killing the two officers, Dezi Freeman, remains on the run. But Papworth said none of the officers searching for Freeman would be redirected to Saturday’s protests.

“I can give assurances that the operation in Porepunkah is our primary focus,” he said.

About 150 National Socialist Network (NSN) members led the anti-immigration march last month, with a number of neo-Nazis attacking Camp Sovereignty at the end of the rally. Seven have since been arrested over the alleged affray and assaults.

Papworth said protecting Camp Sovereignty would be a focus for police this weekend.

He said police did not have any intelligence suggesting there would be any issues at the camp last month.

NSN leader Thomas Sewell remains behind bars after being charged over the Camp Sovereignty attack – which he allegedly ordered – and denied bail.

Papworth said there was a risk that neo-Nazis would again be in attendance on Saturday.

“Having someone of [Sewell’s] stature behind bars in the lead-up to what we feel is a risk of NSN attending again absolutely minimises that risk, but we’re also well aware of other people within that group who are willing to step up into that person’s shoes and take that role,” he said.

“The primary goal is to keep the groups apart.”

https://www.theage.com.au/national/victoria/protesters-to-face-off-in-melbourne-cbd-again-triggering-huge-police-response-20250910-p5mtse.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122208

File: 484f8e82ca16a3e⋯.jpg (157.27 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23571707 (100948ZSEP25) Notable: Palau President Surangel Whipps Jr says ‘we’re already at war’ with China - Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has announced negotiations on a security treaty with Fiji, even as Palau’s President Surangel Whipps Jr declared the Pacific was “already at war” with China. Speaking in Hawaii, Whipps warned the region was “under constant threat” and called for stronger US naval deployments. The Solomon Islands’ decision to ban all PIF partners to exclude Taiwan stirred controversy, while Beijing’s diplomats were seen monitoring delegates. Albanese, chauffeured in a Chinese-made car donated to the host, said discussions with Fiji were at an early stage but emphasised its importance in Pacific security.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122155

>>122195

>>122199

Palau President Surangel Whipps Jr says ‘we’re already at war’ with China

BEN PACKHAM - 10 September 2025

1/2

Anthony Albanese has revealed Australia will negotiate a security treaty with Fiji in a fresh move by his government to counter Beijing, as the host of next year’s ­Pacific Island Forum warned “We are already at war” with China.

The commitment to the new pact with the Pacific’s most ­militarily-capable nation came just a day after Vanuatu scuttled a $500m security agreement with Australia that would have blocked China from delivering major projects in the country.

Beijing’s soaring influence in the region has been a hot topic at this year’s PIF in Solomon Islands, with Palau’s President Surangel Whipps Jr declaring en route to the forum that the region was “under constant threat” from China.

“I might venture to say we are already at war, and the best way to combat this is through partnership with like-minded nations who believe peace comes through strength and presence is deterrence,” he told a conference at US Indo-Pacific Command in Hawaii. He said he wanted more US naval visits and rotational deployments to counter the Chinese threat.

The forum’s Beijing-friendly host sparked controversy this year by banning all PIF partners from participating in order to exclude Taiwan. The ruling meant China was also prevented from attending, but Beijing’s diplomats in Honiara have been sighted monitoring the movements of delegates.

“They are trying to observe, and work out what is going on,” one high-level source said.

“They are at the airport taking notes and sitting in cars parked outside the venue with god-knows-what equipment.”

There were also suspicions that China’s ambassador to Solomon Islands, Cai Weiming, was seeking to conduct bilateral meetings outside the forum venue with Pacific leaders.

Mr Albanese declined to say whether the proposed treaty would be a formal alliance or offer Australian security guarantees to Fiji, saying preliminary discussions were focused on expanding joint training and strengthening the interoperability of the ­nations’ militaries. “I don’t want to pre-empt the discussions. They are at early stages,” he said.

“But certainly the relationship with Fiji is an important one. Fiji has a very significant position in the Pacific.”

Fiji’s Prime Minister, Sitiveni Rabuka, who previously said Chinese bases were not welcome in the Pacific, thanked Mr Albanese for his commitment to getting the deal done.

He said the nations had a “mutual concern for the trans-Pacific drug trafficking”, and apologised for shipments that got through to Australia.

“We should look at ways of improving that,” he said.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122209

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23571713 (100957ZSEP25) Notable: Video: Boost for Australia as new security deal with Fiji in the works - Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has confirmed Australia and Fiji are negotiating a stronger security agreement, with discussions focused on interoperability, training, and defence cooperation. The talks, revealed at the Pacific Islands Forum, follow the collapse of a $500m deal with Vanuatu over concerns it would block Chinese investment in critical infrastructure. Albanese also pledged $100m to the Pacific Resilience Facility for climate and disaster response, calling it a “promise” to the region. He described Fiji’s Prime Minister Sitiveni Rabuka as a “good friend” and signalled further announcements with Papua New Guinea next week.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122155

>>122199

Boost for Australia as new security deal with Fiji in the works

Daniel Jeffrey - Sep 10, 2025

A day after a strategic setback in the Pacific, the federal government has received a major boost, with talks under way for an improved security agreement between Australia and Fiji.

While the two countries already have formal economic and security ties, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese confirmed today that work has begun to take the relationship "to the next level".

"Preliminary discussions have been about increased security agreements or an upgrade in our security relationship," he said on the sidelines of the Pacific Islands Forum in the Solomon Islands today.

"That could range from increased interoperability, the sort of training we are seeing with the policing initiative being expanded to increase engagement between our defence forces."

The development comes just a day after Albanese was expected to sign a bilateral agreement with Vanuatu, only for that $500 million deal to stall over concerns from Port Vila that it would prevent the Pacific nation from getting critical infrastructure funding from China.

Albanese and Vanuatu counterpart Jotham Napat both said yesterday that they remained confident the agreement would still be signed.

Beijing has been seeking to gain a security foothold in the South Pacific in recent years, including by signing an agreement with the Solomon Islands in 2022 that raised concerns about a possible People's Liberation Army Navy base in one of Australia's closest neighbours.

Today, Albanese announced Australia would invest $100 million in the Pacific Resilience Facility – a fund to help nations in the region mitigate and respond to climate change and the natural disasters it causes.

"This is more than a fund, it's a promise to Pacific communities they will not face climate threats alone," he said.

Albanese said he wouldn't pre-empt the discussions the government is having with Fiji, but said Prime Minister Sitiveni Rabuka was a "good friend of Australia".

He also flagged a further announcement with Papua New Guinea would be made next week.

"Certainly the relationship with Fiji is an important one, Fiji has a very significant position in the Pacific," Albanese said.

"We'll have more to say about the relationship with Papua New Guinea next week, which is, of course, a very important one."

https://www.9news.com.au/national/australia-fiji-security-talks-pacific-islands-forum/e46bdd14-8584-408b-8b03-c5ede56ab8e8

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GKeUMvHX8DA

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122210

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23571721 (101008ZSEP25) Notable: Video: ‘Ghost Sharks’ and a historic defence treaty to China-proof our nearest neighbour - Australia and Papua New Guinea will sign a landmark defence treaty committing both nations to act together against a “common danger,” a shift likened to ANZUS and hailed by the Lowy Institute as a “flagship achievement.” The pact will allow PNG citizens to serve in the Australian Defence Force and gain a pathway to citizenship, marking a historic move away from Port Moresby’s non-aligned stance. Alongside this, Canberra announced a $1.7b contract with US firm Anduril to build Ghost Shark underwater drones in Sydney, boosting autonomous naval capability against China’s growing presence.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122155

>>122199

>>122209

‘Ghost Sharks’ and a historic defence treaty to China-proof our nearest neighbour

Matthew Knott - September 10, 2025

1/2

Australia and Papua New Guinea will vow to defend each other if they come under attack in a historic defence treaty that will elevate the relationship to a top-tier alliance.

As the Albanese government spends almost $2 billion on underwater drones called Ghost Sharks to compete with China’s rapid military build-up, it is also deepening ties with Pacific neighbours to prevent Beijing from gaining a permanent security foothold in the region.

Sources familiar with the Australia-PNG defence treaty, set to be signed by Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and counterpart James Marape early next week, said it will include a clause obliging the two nations to act together to meet a “common danger”, language echoing Australia’s existing military alliances with the United States and New Zealand.

Papua New Guineans will also be allowed to serve in the Australian Defence Force and put on a path to Australian citizenship under the treaty.

The move would represent a major foreign policy victory for the government after Vanuatu abruptly scuttled plans to sign a 10-year security and economic pact with Australia this week because of concerns it could curtail Chinese investment in the Pacific nation.

Albanese revealed on Wednesday he was also in talks with Fijian counterpart Sitiveni Rabuka about signing a new treaty as Australia strives to embed itself, rather than China, as the Pacific’s top security partner.

The ANZUS treaty that Australia signed with the United States and New Zealand in 1951 committed the nations to consult each other in the event of an armed attack or threat to their territorial integrity.

The ANZUS treaty also states that “an armed attack in the Pacific Area on any of the Parties would be dangerous to its own peace and safety and declares that it would act to meet the common danger in accordance with its constitutional processes”.

Mihai Sora, Pacific Islands program director at the Lowy Institute, said the Australia-PNG defence treaty was shaping up to represent a “flagship achievement for Australia in the Pacific”.

“This would represent the highest level of mutual commitment between Australia and any Pacific island nation,” he said.

“It would also be a historic shift away from PNG’s traditional non-aligned, friends-to-all policy.”

Sora said he expected some ambiguity in the way the treaty obligations are phrased, including respect for each nation’s parliamentary processes, but said this would not undermine the significance of the pact.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122211

File: 52a2ff99b6d842b⋯.jpg (454.55 KB,3800x3044,950:761,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 75624fc52efd2bf⋯.jpg (294.69 KB,750x868,375:434,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 1721022b0f50bbd⋯.mp4 (14.92 MB,640x360,16:9,Clipboard.mp4)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23571742 (101043ZSEP25) Notable: Video: Donald Trump accuses Australian author Scott Stuart’s children’s book of ‘radical gender ideology’ - US President Donald Trump has targeted My Shadow Is Pink, a children’s book by Australian author Scott Stuart, accusing it of promoting “radical gender ideology.” At a Religious Liberty Commission event, Trump introduced a 12-year-old student who said he was forced to read the book in fifth grade and bullied because of his faith. Stuart responded in a video, saying Trump was using his books for political gain and the student as a pawn. Stuart’s agent Sarah McKenzie praised the book as “groundbreaking,” stressing its core message of acceptance, equality and love.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122169

Donald Trump accuses Australian author Scott Stuart’s children’s book of ‘radical gender ideology’

US president says fifth-grade student forced to read aloud My Shadow Is Pink, a book about a boy who loves ‘things not for boys’

Australian Associated Press - 10 Sep 2025

1/2

An Australian children’s author has fired back after Donald Trump singled out his book as promoting “radical gender ideology”.

The US president appeared onstage with a school student, who said he was forced to read My Shadow Is Pink by the Australian author and illustrator Scott Stuart.

The book is about a boy who loves “things not for boys” such as princesses and fairies, and challenges gender stereotypes.

Trump introduced the 12-year-old student, who stood on a riser behind a podium at a Religious Liberty Commission event and delivered a short speech.

Trump said that in 2024, when the boy was in fifth grade, he had been “forced to read a book to a Kindergarten student promoting a message of radical gender ideology that is contrary to his religious beliefs and ours”.

“The school treated us badly, and kids started bullying me and my brother because of our faith, and the school did nothing to stop it,” he said.

“I believe kids like me should be able to live our faith at school without being forced to go against what we believe. I hope no other family has to go through what mine did.”

Stuart responded in an online video, saying Trump was using his children’s books to further his own political agenda, and that the student who made the speech was being used as a pawn.

“The irony here is that they want acceptance for their beliefs, but not to extend that acceptance on to others,” the author said.

The My Shadow books are not about culture wars, but about helping kids be themselves without prejudice, according to Stuart, who said his inbox had been filled with messages of hate since the speech.

Stuart’s literary agent, Sarah McKenzie, also responded, stating online that she was proud of his “groundbreaking” picture book.

“Pity the conservative right can’t grasp the simple and beautiful message about acceptance, equality and love.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122212

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23571755 (101051ZSEP25) Notable: MRF-D 25.3: Mid-Deployment Message - (Video) U.S. Marines with Marine Rotational Force - Darwin 25.3 give a message for the mid-point of their deployment, July 7, 2025. MRF-D is an annual six-month rotational deployment to enhance interoperability with the Australian Defence Force and allies and partners and provide a forward-postured crisis response force in the Indo-Pacific.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109310 (pb)

>>109558 (pb)

MRF-D 25.3: Mid-Deployment Message

Marine Rotational Force - Darwin

Sep 9, 2025

U.S. Marines with Marine Rotational Force – Darwin 25.3 give a message for the mid-point of their deployment, July 7, 2025.

MRF-D is an annual six-month rotational deployment to enhance interoperability with the Australian Defence Force and allies and partners and provide a forward-postured crisis response force in the Indo-Pacific. (U.S. Marine Corps video by Cpl. Keegan Jones)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tdbqKc84ksE

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122213

File: 981e8d32be99574⋯.jpg (313.84 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: ca6621c29b68af5⋯.jpg (213.1 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 4eb858a31efc9ad⋯.jpg (297.46 KB,750x1012,375:506,Clipboard.jpg)

File: b78fd8fb333c3eb⋯.jpg (248.14 KB,750x748,375:374,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 54c6833b5767f6a⋯.jpg (92.66 KB,750x424,375:212,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23578901 (110855ZSEP25) Notable: Conservative activist Charlie Kirk criticised Australian politics for years before death - American commentator Charlie Kirk, founder of Turning Point USA, was shot dead during a Utah speaking event in what authorities described as a “political assassination.” The 31-year-old, long a critic of Australian policy, frequently attacked Canberra’s stance on free speech, Covid-19 restrictions, immigration, and gun control. He defended Elon Musk in a 2024 censorship row with Anthony Albanese, praised Melbourne protesters who shut down a Drag Queen Story Time, and denounced Novak Djokovic’s deportation as a “human rights abuse.” Kirk also cited research challenging Australia’s gun buyback. President Trump mourned him as “The Great, and even Legendary, Charlie Kirk.”

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Conservative activist Charlie Kirk criticised Australian politics for years before death

Conservative activist Charlie Kirk had frequently challenged Australian leaders, government policies and social movements.

Jack Evans - September 11, 2025

1/2

American political commentator Charlie Kirk, tragically shot dead in the US on Thursday, had frequently challenged Australian leaders and government policies in recent years.

Kirk, the conservative activist and founder of Turning Point USA, was shot and killed during a speaking event at Utah Valley University on Thursday, in what authorities call a “political assassination”.

The 31-year-old’s death sent shockwaves through global political circles, but his passing also marks the end of a voice that had been sporadically critical of Australian government policies over recent years.

Kirk, who was answering questions about transgender issues and gun violence when the fatal shot was fired, had built a significant following through his political commentary.

He has frequently criticised Australia’s approach to free speech, Covid-19 restrictions, and immigration policies.

One of his most recent engagements with Australian politics came in April 2024, when Kirk shared a Sky News story about Prime Minister Anthony Albanese’s criticism of Elon Musk for refusing to comply with censorship demands to remove posts about the stabbing of a bishop in Sydney.

“This is a bloke who’s chosen ego and showing violence over common sense … other social media companies have complied,” Albanese was quoted as saying about Musk.

When Musk replied to Kirk’s X post stating “X is the only one standing up for the rights of Australians,” Kirk responded, “We support you 100 per cent.”

Kirk’s commentary on Australia stretched back several years, often focusing on what he viewed as government overreach.

In April 2023, he praised Melbourne protesters who shut down a local council meeting ahead of a Drag Queen Story Time.

“Melbourne, Australia protesters shut down a local council meeting ahead of a scheduled Drag Queen Story Time holding ‘Save Our Children’ signs and shouting ‘Shame on You.’ More of this. All around the world,” he wrote.

Tennis star Novak Djokovic’s treatment by Australian authorities became a particular focus for Kirk.

Following Djokovic’s 2023 Australian Open victory, Kirk wrote: “Congratulations to Novak Djokovic for winning the Australian Open! This year he wins the trophy and will become the No. 1 men’s tennis player in the world.

“Last year the Australian government deported him for not being vaccinated. Freedom is always worth fighting for,” Kirk wrote.

During the height of the deportation controversy in January 2022, Kirk had called for economic consequences, stating: “We should cease trade with the Australian Government given their treatment of Novak Djokovic. These are Human Rights Abuses — there must be a cost.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122214

File: 32b8aacc08ccb74⋯.jpg (105.16 KB,814x236,407:118,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 89aecab19c7b353⋯.jpg (229.18 KB,814x390,407:195,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 72f36a950540476⋯.jpg (146.96 KB,814x275,74:25,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 9c8439bf49a12e2⋯.jpg (301.13 KB,814x651,814:651,Clipboard.jpg)

File: fa23e89ab9d8006⋯.mp4 (15.08 MB,640x338,320:169,Clipboard.mp4)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23578932 (110912ZSEP25) Notable: Donald J. Trump Truth: (Video) TO MY GREAT FELLOW AMERICANS…

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122213

Donald J. Trump Truths

We must all pray for Charlie Kirk, who has been shot. A great guy from top to bottom. GOD BLESS HIM!

https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/115181549363103818

The Great, and even Legendary, Charlie Kirk, is dead. No one understood or had the Heart of the Youth in the United States of America better than Charlie. He was loved and admired by ALL, especially me, and now, he is no longer with us. Melania and my Sympathies go out to his beautiful wife Erika, and family. Charlie, we love you!

https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/115181934991844419

In honor of Charlie Kirk, a truly Great American Patriot, I am ordering all American Flags throughout the United States lowered to Half Mast until Sunday evening at 6 P.M.

https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/115182019266546196

TO MY GREAT FELLOW AMERICANS…

https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/115182892535295750

https://x.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1965947311718269341

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122215

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23578960 (110936ZSEP25) Notable: Activist assassinated:Labor, opposition condemn ‘political violence’ after Trump ally Charlie Kirk shot dead- (Video) The killing of American conservative activist Charlie Kirk in Utah has drawn bipartisan condemnation in Canberra. Acting Prime Minister Richard Marles called the shooting “an absolute tragedy,” stressing Australia’s commitment to peaceful political debate. Opposition deputy Sussan Ley said the Coalition stood “in solidarity with those who mourn,” while Liberal senator James Paterson labelled the attack “absolutely shocking” and noted an “uptick” in political violence. Greens senator Sarah Hanson-Young blamed America’s “gun culture and culture of political assassination,” contrasting it with Australia. The debate follows ASIO warnings of rising radicalism and declining social cohesion at home.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122213

>>122214

Labor, opposition condemn ‘political violence’ after Trump ally shot dead

JOSEPH OLBRYCHT-PALMER AND ELODIE JAKES - 11 September 2025

The apparent assassination of a prominent American right-wing activist and close ally of Donald Trump has forced Australian parliamentarians of all persuasions to reflect on the state of politics at home.

Charlie Kirk, 31, was shot dead overnight while speaking at a university in Utah.

He co-founded conservative advocacy group Turning Point USA at 18 and led a push to promote conservative viewpoints on campuses.

At reporting, authorities were still on the hunt for a suspect after releasing a person of interest from custody.

Acting Prime Minister Richard Marles said on Thursday his death “is an absolute tragedy”.

“Our thoughts go out to the family of Charlie Kirk,” Mr Marles told Sky News.

“Obviously, we condemn any form of political violence.

“It really matters that political discourse occurs peacefully and through dialogue and conversation, and what we’ve seen play out in the United States over the last few hours is an absolute tragedy.”

He went on to say that from “an Australian point of view … we very much cherish the ability to be able to have dialogue and conversation and debate in this country free from political violence”.

The opposition echoed the government, with Sussan Ley saying the Coalition stood “in solidarity with those who mourn” and Liberal frontbencher James Paterson calling the killing “absolutely shocking”.

Senator Paterson said it “is a very distressing thing for those of us who think fondly of the United States”, lamenting an “uptick” in political violence targeting both sides of politics.

At least two attempts to assassinate Donald Trump, a Republican, have failed since July last year.

A gunman also shot two state Democratic politicians in Minnesota in July this year.

One, Melissa Hortman, died from her wounds.

Greens senator Sarah Hanson-Young put the “uptick” down to “this gun culture and culture of political assassination” as well as a “rise of nasty politics and nasty type of debate and hate” that she said was “obviously really shaking the foundations of America”.

“I am thankful … that gun culture and kind of political assassination culture is something that stands in stark difference to Australia,” Senator Hanson-Young said.

“(It’s) not something that we are used to here and something that we must resist at all costs and with effort.”

It is no secret Australia is grappling with its own rise in radicalism, with the Australian Security Intelligence Organisation hiking the terror threat level to “probable” last year.

ASIO chief Mike Burgess has since been calling for the country to cool down the political discourse and warned that Australians are becoming radicalised by increasingly complex reasons.

Anthony Albanese himself said earlier this week that crumbling social cohesion was causing him “a great deal of distress”.

The Prime Minister made the comments in relation to alleged cop killer Dezi Freeman.

Police in Victoria have been trawling the Garden State’s alpine wilderness for Freeman since the self-identifying sovereign citizen allegedly gunned down two Victoria Police officers on August 26.

Similarly, Australia’s biggest cities have been hit by waves of anti-Semitic attacks since Hamas’ October 7 attacks on Israel in 2023.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/breaking-news/labor-opposition-condemn-political-violence-after-trump-ally-shot-dead/news-story/931ced118c7061c17009b8cb4d1f9f8e

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oDbZpJ-jyxk

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122216

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23589750 (122254ZSEP25) Notable: Video: At Australian and UK vigils, Charlie Kirk supporters say death won't kill his message - Candlelit vigils in Sydney and London brought together supporters of slain US conservative activist Charlie Kirk, who was shot dead in Utah. In Sydney, about 350 people gathered as Turning Point Australia founder Joel Jammal declared, “it’s going to take more than one bullet to silence his message,” urging followers to join weekend anti-government protests. In London, around a thousand mourners braved heavy rain outside Prime Minister Keir Starmer’s residence, many in MAGA hats and draped in US and UK flags. Kirk’s Turning Point USA had spawned international offshoots, including Turning Point Australia and Turning Point UK, which have hosted figures such as Nigel Farage and collaborated with One Nation.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122213

>>122214

>>122215

At Australian and UK vigils, Charlie Kirk supporters say death won't kill his message

Alasdair Pal - September 13, 2025

1/3

SYDNEY/LONDON, Sept 12 (Reuters) - About a thousand supporters of Charlie Kirk gathered in London on Friday night to mourn the murder of the conservative activist, hours after hundreds held a candle-lit vigil in Sydney to keep his message alive.

Kirk, a 31-year-old author, podcast host and close ally of U.S. President Donald Trump, was shot dead on Wednesday as he gave a talk at a university in Utah. The president has condemned the murder as a "heinous assassination."

His Turning Point USA activist group, which advocates for right-wing causes, has spawned a number of international offshoots, including in Australia and Britain.

"I know you feel the pain of this loss of Charlie, but it's going to take more than one bullet to silence his message," Joel Jammal, founder of Turning Point Australia, told the crowd, estimated around 350 strong by police.

Jammal called on supporters to attend separate anti-government protests planned in the city on Saturday.

While Kirk's social media activity had made him an online presence in Britain as well, his Turning Point UK had a much lower profile. After news of his murder, however, around a thousand people gathered on Friday night outside Prime Minister Keir Starmer's residence in often heavy rain.

Wearing MAGA hats and draped in British and American flags, the crowd was strikingly diverse - a mix of older, white British attendees alongside many young men and a number of Australians and New Zealanders.

Some people brought white and red flowers. The event did not have any speakers but people in the crowd could be overheard discussing Kirk’s views and remembering his most striking debates.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122217

File: abb15099d34f3b7⋯.jpg (4.74 MB,3634x2727,3634:2727,Clipboard.jpg)

File: dda0213e861d74e⋯.jpg (2.99 MB,3150x2101,3150:2101,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 1c467eb9a6ed3d9⋯.jpg (3.59 MB,3150x2101,3150:2101,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 148cea2a5278328⋯.jpg (1.61 MB,2861x1908,2861:1908,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23589794 (122303ZSEP25) Notable: Charlie Kirk’s influence on Joel Jammal and Australian conservative Christian politics - Joel Jammal, a Christian conservative activist, first came to prominence at University of Technology Sydney when he refused mandatory consent training before graduating. He went on to found Turning Point Australia, directly inspired by Charlie Kirk’s Turning Point USA, and credits Kirk’s organisation with providing the support and model needed to establish the group four years ago. Jammal said plans were underway to bring Kirk and his wife Erika to Australia on tour, calling him “a family man winning a noble fight to reconnect with politics.” After Kirk’s assassination, Jammal hosted a Sydney vigil, insisting no one could “fill Charlie’s shoes,” while acknowledging Kirk’s enduring impact on his own activism.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122213

>>122214

>>122215

>>122216

Charlie Kirk’s influence on Joel Jammal and Australian conservative Christian politics

Alexandra Smith - September 12, 2025

Joel Jammal’s first foray into political battle was during his university days, when the self-described Christian conservative rallied against a policy to withhold his final results until he completed mandatory sexual consent training.

The then-21-year-old stared down the University of Technology Sydney and won, graduating with a degree in property economics without touching the training. His next target? A political party.

Jammal and his young mate, 18-year-old Samraat Grewal, were so incensed with alleged nepotism and mismanagement within the Christian Democrats, led by the long-serving NSW MP Fred Nile, that the pair orchestrated a revolt to take over their fractured party.

Their audacious bid was not successful but the party ultimately folded and Nile retired from parliament, after 40 years in politics. The once strong conservative Christian political force in NSW was no more.

Jammal is now behind Turning Point Australia, a right-wing chapter of the influential youth conservative group Turning Point USA – which was started by Charlie Kirk, the American conservative activist who was shot dead this week at an event at Utah Valley University.

On Friday night Jammal hosted a vigil for Kirk in Sydney’s Hyde Park to “respect a life well lived and one taken away too soon”. He told the gathering of about 300 mourners “there will not be another man like Charlie Kirk”.

Jammal deeply admired Kirk but does not want to be described as Australia’s version of the activist, stressing that the 31-year-old was a tour de force in his own right.

“I am proud of what I have done but I don’t feel comfortable being compared to Charlie,” Jammal said. “Charlie Kirk was his own beast, in a realm of his own. Even the Americans are saying no one can fill Charlie’s shoes.”

In 2022 Jammal organised the Australian tour of Nigel Farage, now leader of Reform UK. Farage connected Jammal to Kirk and Turning Point USA, which was launched 13 years ago to advocate for conservative politics on high school and university campuses.

Jammal says Kirk never studied at university but was determined to encourage a contest of ideas on US campuses. While the pair were not firm friends, Jammal says Kirk and his organisation were instrumental in helping him establish Turning Force Australia four years ago.

There were plans under way to bring Kirk and his wife Erika on an Australian tour.

“We were looking forward to bringing him out on tour because he was widely admired for his Christian values, a family man winning a noble fight to reconnect with politics,” Jammal said.

Turning Point Australia, according to its website, was “born out of the resistance to the COVID-19 lockdowns imposed by state governments across Australia”. “These lockdowns took away our basic human freedoms from everyday Australians with no regard for our lives or livelihoods,” the site says.

Jammal, like Kirk, has become an increasingly common fixture on the fringes of the conservative movement. Jammal works with right-wing candidates on elections and he says he provided 250,000 electronic how-to-vote cards via the Turning Point Australia website during the federal election.

He hosts a podcast called The Ark, where he debates Australian politics, freedom of speech, social issues and international affairs with his guests. Jammal’s first interviewees on his podcast were regional paramedic John Larter, who lost a legal challenge over vaccine mandates, and fellow anti-COVID-19 vaccine activist and former Qantas pilot Graham Hood.

Larter and Hood joined Jammal at Kirk’s vigil.

In recent months Jammal says the number of followers on Turning Point Australia social accounts has soared, and while the organisation once relied on donations it now has significant funding streams from advertising revenue as well as gold and cryptocurrency brokers.

Jammal, who lost his job in construction during COVID-19 lockdowns, has found his new calling, which he says was kick-started by his bold bid many years ago to topple the then-giant of Christian politics, Nile.

“Samraat and I were just young people who were uncompromising in our principles, much like Charlie,” Jammal said.

https://www.theage.com.au/politics/nsw/charlie-kirk-s-influence-on-joel-jammal-and-australian-conservative-christian-politics-20250912-p5mukh.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122218

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23590201 (130023ZSEP25) Notable: Video: Sussan Ley sacks Senator Jacinta Nampijinpa Price from Liberal frontbench - Opposition Leader Sussan Ley has removed Jacinta Nampijinpa Price from the shadow ministry after she refused to apologise for comments linking Indian migration to Labor’s vote and declined to back Ley’s leadership. Ley said the remarks had “caused Australians of Indian heritage significant hurt” and that confidence in the leader was essential for frontbenchers. Price, who labelled her comments “clumsy” but not apologetic, vowed to keep speaking out from the backbench. The saga has fuelled internal divisions, with Alex Hawke and Dave Sharma criticising Price’s stance, while Tony Abbott defended her as “a big loss” to the frontbench.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122143

>>122190

Sussan Ley sacks Senator Jacinta Nampijinpa Price from Liberal frontbench

Natassia Chrysanthos and Paul Sakkal - September 10, 2025

1/2

Opposition Leader Sussan Ley has sacked Senator Jacinta Nampijinpa Price from the Coalition’s frontbench after a week of infighting engulfed the Liberal Party over the firebrand’s inflammatory comments about Indian migrants.

Ley asked Price to resign from the shadow ministry on Wednesday afternoon after the senator refused to back Ley and declined to apologise to the Indian community in a six-minute press conference, aggravating the dispute that has rocked the opposition for eight days.

“Despite being given sufficient time and space to do so, Senator Nampijinpa Price failed to apologise for remarks which have caused Australians of Indian heritage significant hurt,” Ley said in a statement on Wednesday night.

“She also refused to provide confidence in my leadership of the Liberal Party and sadly, that has made her position untenable in my shadow ministry. The Liberal Party I lead will respect, reflect and represent modern Australia.”

The past week has emerged as a test of Ley’s leadership and new direction for the Liberals after the election as Price’s claims made on the ABC – that Labor was bringing in Indian migrants to win votes – derailed her efforts to rebuild trust in multicultural communities.

While Price walked back her remarks, she did not say sorry. She then accused Ley’s key backer, Liberal MP Alex Hawke, of “cowardly and inappropriate” behaviour and suggested Ley was not standing up for women in the Liberal Party.

The saga upset many Indian Australians and infuriated colleagues. The allegations against Hawke deepened the fallout, while Price’s ongoing defiance undermined Ley’s leadership and led other MPs to question why it had been allowed to drag out so long.

After Price made her Wednesday comments, Liberal senator Dave Sharma said she ought to resign. “What are you doing in the shadow ministry if you don’t support the leader’s direction? I just don’t think the two positions are compatible,” he told Sky News.

In the press conference preceding her axing, Price conceded her comments to the ABC were “certainly clumsy” but that she would not be silenced on the issue of “mass migration”. She did not apologise despite repeated calls from her colleagues, but thanked her supporters.

Price then refused three times to say whether she backed Ley’s leadership – saying “those matters are for our party room” – in a provocative move that ultimately led to her sacking.

Ley said she called Price shortly afterwards. “My call to her was to advise her of the decision that I have made and to advise her that today, critically, she refused to express confidence in my leadership of Liberal Party,” the opposition leader said on Wednesday night.

“Confidence in the leader is a requirement for serving in the shadow ministry.”

Former prime minister Tony Abbott, a prominent supporter of Price, said she would be “a big loss to the frontbench but I’m confident that she will continue to make a strong contribution to our public life”.

Price vowed to keep speaking out from the backbench but accepted Ley’s request to quit the shadow ministry as the defence industry spokeswoman. “I have accepted the leader’s decision. And I reiterated my regret in not being clearer in my comments on the ABC last Wednesday,” she said in a statement.

“Nevertheless, I took the opportunity to express to the leader my disappointment that some colleagues disregarded the key point I was making about the damaging impacts of mass migration. And that some colleagues instead chose to indulge agenda-driven media commentary on this matter.”

“To reiterate comments from my earlier statement: I never intended to be disparaging towards our Indian community. And I wish no ill-will whatsoever to the Indian community – or any other migrant group.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122219

File: 44130f34da4386f⋯.jpg (388.02 KB,1664x1280,13:10,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 6e85738dc7da75c⋯.jpg (278.01 KB,1536x1243,1536:1243,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 960f06c54aca638⋯.jpg (279.46 KB,1536x1345,1536:1345,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23590438 (130114ZSEP25) Notable: China collects fingerprints in Solomon Islands under Mao-era policing initiative - A Chinese-led “community policing” program in Solomon Islands is collecting citizens’ fingerprints and household registration data, drawing comparisons to Mao Zedong’s Cultural Revolution–era “Fengqiao Experience.” Chinese police, working with local officers, have piloted the scheme near Honiara, offering uniforms and equipment in exchange for personal data. Opposition figures Peter Kenilorea Jnr and Celsus Talifilu warned it was an infringement of privacy, likely illegal, and risked silencing dissent. Analysts said Beijing is exporting its surveillance model, undermining rights and overlapping with Australian policing support. The initiative emerged as Pacific Islands leaders met in Honiara, where China’s influence was a dominant theme.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122155

>>122195

>>122199

>>122208

China collects fingerprints in Solomon Islands under Mao-era policing initiative

BEN PACKHAM - September 11, 2025

1/2

A Chinese-led program in Solomon Islands is fingerprinting the country’s citizens and getting them to fill out household registration cards under the guise of “community policing”, as Beijing moves to export its surveillance state governance model to the Pacific.

Chinese police are working with Pacific counterparts to roll out the program, based on Mao Zedong’s “Fengqiao Experience” – a system that required citizens to keep tabs on each other during the Cultural Revolution.

The initiative, which commenced last week, is the starkest example yet of Beijing’s interference in the lives of everyday Solomon Islanders since the countries’ controversial 2022 security agreement.

Billed as a way to resolve conflicts, manage populations and protect communities, it has shocked Solomon Islands opposition figures, who warn it is an infringement of citizens’ rights and likely illegal.

The Solomon Islands government said a pilot program involved Chinese police liaison officers providing training in “filling out household registration cards and population information cards, drawing community maps, and collecting fingerprints and palm prints”.

It is being implemented in parallel with self defence classes delivered by Chinese police who are proficient in kung fu.

Details of the data-collection initiative emerged as the region’s leaders, including Anthony Albanese, met in Solomon Islands for the Pacific Islands Forum.

Program participants in the township of Fighter One, near Honiara, were given “briefcases, community uniforms and other materials” in return for handing over their data.

Chinese police inspector Lin Jiamu said the initiative would be expanded across the country, “thereby comprehensively enhancing the community management capabilities and safety levels”.

Honiara’s officer in charge of community policing, Constable Joel Saumanu, said the aim was to build a program “that can be replicated nationwide”.

The Australian Prime Minister was unavailable to comment, while Foreign Minister Penny Wong’s office declined to provide her views.

Opposition foreign affairs spokeswoman Michaelia Cash said it was “a very concerning development”, and it was vital that the personal information of Pacific Islanders was not compromised.

“Australia must continue to take the leading role in standing for transparency and democratic values in our region,” Senator Cash said.

The Fengqiao Experience is named after a town in Zhejiang province where residents were required to monitor each other and reform troublemakers through “struggle sessions”.

Chinese President Xi Jinping has implemented a modern version through a system of local area associations that shot to prominence during the Covid era, when rule-breakers were informed on and detained by authorities.

Solomon Islands opposition MP Peter Kenilorea Jnr said the program was “definitely an infringement into people’s privacy”.

“Why would anybody, unless you are being arrested, surrender to fingerprinting?” Mr Kenolorea said.

“This is unheard of in the Solomon Islands’ context, let alone being promoted by police. I’m deeply concerned about this. The act of collecting fingerprints is one thing. And equally so, the database they seem to be wanting to collect. Where is that going to be held and what will they use it for? I’m just trying to wrap my head around this.”

Mr Kenilorea said that when Solomon Islands introduced registration of mobile phone SIM cards, there was a lengthy parliamentary debate and new legislation was required.

But he said the Chinese community policing initiative had been introduced without the endorsement of parliament.

“The freedoms of Solomon Islanders are something we value very much,” he said.

“I would like to see this be clarified in parliament. There needs to be a law that governs this and also protects the privacy and constitutional rights of individuals.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122220

File: 5720a23bc158304⋯.jpg (3.46 MB,1144x6207,1144:6207,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23590481 (130123ZSEP25) Notable: RSIPF and CPLT launch SI-China Police Cooperation Model Community - "The National Crime Prevention Department (NCPD) of the Royal Solomon Island Police Force (RSIPF), together with the China Police Liaison Team (CPLT), has launched the Fighter One community for the construction of the Solomon Island (SI)-China Police Cooperation Model Communities recently. Inspector Lin Jiamu said its aim is to guide SI communities well based on the Chinese community governance experience – the ‘Fengqiao Experience’ – and to better enhance their capabilities in collecting basic community information, population management, self-protection, and resolving conflicts and disputes on their own so as to obtain a safer community environment. CPLT explained the core of community policing work, population management, trained skills such as filling out household registration cards and population information cards, drawing community maps, and collecting fingerprints and palm prints, and shared the Fengqiao experience of community policing management from China. A leader from the Fighter One community, Mr. Andrew Nihopara, acknowledged the RSIPF and CPLT for coming to their community to guide them. This is extremely important for peace and prosperity." - solomons.gov.sb

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122195

>>122199

>>122208

>>122219

RSIPF and CPLT work closely with the Fighter One community to launch the construction of SI-China Police Cooperation Model Communities

solomons.gov.sb - September 3, 2025

The National Crime Prevention Department (NCPD) of the Royal Solomon Island Police Force (RSIPF), together with the China Police Liaison Team (CPLT), has launched the Fighter One community for the construction of the Solomon Island (SI)-China Police Cooperation Model Communities recently.

CPLT member Superintendent Zhangpeng said the SI-China Police Cooperation Model Community is a community-building activity jointly carried out by RSIPF and CPLT.

Inspector Lin Jiamu said its aim is to guide SI communities well based on the Chinese community governance experience—the “Fengqiao Experience”—and to better enhance their capabilities in collecting basic community information, population management, self-protection, and resolving conflicts and disputes on their own so as to obtain a safer community environment.

“Currently, the Fighter One community is the first attempt, and it will be expanded to a larger area across the country in the future, thereby comprehensively enhancing the community management capabilities and safety levels,” said Mr. Jiamu.

Superintendent Zhang Yuanyuan said, “Fighter One Community, as a young and new community, has vast resources and a large population, with good prospects for community development. Therefore, it was jointly selected by RSIPF and CPLT as a model community for police cooperation between SI and China.”

CPLT explained the core of community policing work, population management, trained skills such as filling out household registration cards and population information cards, drawing community maps, and collecting fingerprints and palm prints, and shared the Fengqiao experience of community policing management from China.

CPLT also donated items like briefcases, volunteer uniforms, and other materials to the community to make their work easier. The residents actively participated in the interactive session and were full of expectations for the construction of the model community.

Officer In-Charge, Community Policing Office, Honiara City, Police Constable (PC) Joel Saumanu emphasized the importance of self-management for the community by local people, explaining the related methods and skills.

PC Saumanu said under the guidance of RSIPF and CPLT, the Fighter One community will solidify the basic information data of the community, enhance security precautions, and strive to build a model community that can be replicated nationwide.

A leader from the Fighter One community, Mr. Andrew Nihopara, acknowledged the RSIPF and CPLT for coming to their community to guide them. This is extremely important for peace and prosperity.

https://solomons.gov.sb/rsipf-and-cplt-work-closely-with-the-fighter-one-community-to-launch-the-construction-of-si-china-police-cooperation-model-communities/

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122221

File: 7d6006bee7fa7cc⋯.jpg (153.88 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: bf31f6d4bb9f00f⋯.jpg (194.13 KB,1280x720,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: aad00896d583eef⋯.jpg (153.88 KB,1024x769,1024:769,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23590589 (130143ZSEP25) Notable: Anthony Albanese silent on China in the Solomons after revelations of fingerprinting citizens - Anthony Albanese has refused to raise with Beijing or Honiara revelations that Chinese police are fingerprinting Solomon Islands citizens under a Mao-era “community policing” program, saying he does not “talk about events between countries which don’t involve Australia.” Opposition foreign affairs spokeswoman Michaelia Cash said he was “deliberately ignoring this very concerning development,” while former defence minister Linda Reynolds branded the program “Orwellian.” Solomon Islands figures, including Celsus Talifilu, warned Beijing’s influence is growing through propaganda, fully funded trips for officials, and Chinese Embassy cash programs.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122195

>>122199

>>122208

>>122219

Anthony Albanese silent on China in the Solomons after revelations of fingerprinting citizens

SARAH ISON and BEN PACKHAM - 12 September 2025

1/2

Anthony Albanese will not speak with his counterparts in Beijing or Honiara about revelations that China is fingerprinting Solomon Islands citizens under the guise of a “community policing” program, declaring he doesn’t “talk about events between countries that don’t involve Australia”.

While senior opposition figures in the Solomon Islands have declared Beijing’s fingerprinting initiative a violation of citizens’ rights, they told The Australian people were reluctant to criticise Beijing, even in online forums.

“On Facebook people say, ‘No, they are doing a good job’. The way China is running its propaganda here is pretty intense,” said 2024 election candidate figure and longtime public servant Celsus Talifilu.

It comes at the same time as Beijing ramps up its influence campaign on elected officials, with a growing number of Solomon Island MPs taken on fully-paid trips to China. “Most who go, but not all – they come back and become supportive of China and what they are doing in Solomons,” Mr Talifilu said.

Despite the revelations of China’s fingerprinting program, the Prime Minister indicated he was not made aware of the rollout of the program while in the Solomon Islands this week.

“I was at the Pacific Islands Forum and at an island in the western province of the Solomons,” Mr Albanese said.

He declared the question over the Chinese policing matter had an “obvious” answer.

“I don’t talk to them about events between countries which don’t involve Australia,” he said. “I talk about Australia and our relationship with nations.”

However, Mr Albanese said he wanted members of the Pacific family “to look after our own ­security” in a veiled swipe at the Solomon Islands for permitting a permanent Chinese police presence to be stationed in the region.

Labor’s refusal to weigh in on the stark example of Chinese foreign interference in the Pacific follows its criticism while in opposition of the Morrison government for “the worst Australian foreign policy bungle” in decades after Beijing and Honiara signed a secret security pact in 2022.

The deal allowed for China to carry out ship visits and stopovers in the Pacific nation, as well as stationing the police forces now carrying out fingerprinting of citizens.

Opposition foreign affairs spokeswoman Michaelia Cash said Mr Albanese was “deliberately ignoring this very concerning development in Australia’s backyard”.

“Australia must continue to take the leading role in standing for transparency and democratic values in our region,” Senator Cash said.

Former Home Affairs Department secretary Mike Pezzullo said the rollout of the Chinese “policing” program, revealed by The Australian online on Thursday, should trigger “deep concern”.

“It’s deeply concerning, but almost as equally concerning… when you have this kind of surveillance and authoritarian oppression coming into a country that’s got the British traditional rule of law… is that we don’t call it out,” he said.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122222

File: 12e79c541b50e47⋯.jpg (247.5 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 6e85738dc7da75c⋯.jpg (278.01 KB,1536x1243,1536:1243,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 44130f34da4386f⋯.jpg (388.02 KB,1664x1280,13:10,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23590756 (130210ZSEP25) Notable: OPINION: China fingerprinting Solomon Islanders to ‘resolve conflicts’ is an egregious intrusion - "Extraordinarily, Beijing thought Solomon Islanders would embrace its intrusive system developed during the Cultural Revolution to keep tabs on troublemakers and dissidents… Collecting citizen’s biodata and forcing them to submit detailed household information to authorities might wash in China but it’s way out of order in a democratic country… The fact that the country’s government just let the Chinese police start collecting villagers’ fingerprints shows it is far too meek and trusting when dealing with the might of the communist state… This sorry story should be a lesson to Solomon Islands...It should also be a warning to other Pacific Island states of the dangers of getting too close to Beijing." – Ben Packham, The Australian

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122195

>>122199

>>122208

>>122219

>>122221

OPINION: China fingerprinting Solomon Islanders to ‘resolve conflicts’ is an egregious intrusion

BEN PACKHAM - September 11, 2025

For a long time, China tried to hide its intention to dominate ­Pacific Island states. Now it’s saying the quiet parts out loud.

Extraordinarily, Beijing thought Solomon Islanders would embrace its intrusive ­system developed during the Cultural Revolution to keep tabs on troublemakers and dissidents.

It made no attempt to hide the initiative, declaring it would be “expanded to a larger area across the country”.

This speaks to the clash of values between the Chinese Communist Party’s authoritarianism and the Pacific’s respect-based tribal systems that coexist comfortably with democratic ideals.

When Solomon Islands’ former Sogavare government shocked the region by signing a security agreement with Beijing three years ago, the biggest fear on the minds of Australian officials was that China would establish a military base in Australia’s immediate neighbourhood.

That remains a worst-case scenario.

It’s why Anthony Albanese works so hard to keep regional counterparts onside at events like this week’s Pacific Islands Forum in Honiara.

But security isn’t just about military power. It’s also about rights and personal freedoms.

Collecting citizen’s biodata and forcing them to submit detailed household information to authorities might wash in China but it’s way out of order in a democratic country – even a struggling Pacific Island state. This is a massive overreach by Beijing, though not a surprising one.

It has long sought to export its governance model to compliant states, arguing its system is superior to those of Western democracies with all their pesky individual rights.

What is surprising is that ­Solomon Islands’ Manele government accepted this initiative so unquestioningly.

The program was rolled out in a village near Honiara just a week before the country hosted the ­Pacific Island Forum.

There were zero checks and balances. It hadn’t been debated in parliament.

There was no information on why citizens needed to provide their fingerprints, where the data would be kept, or what security precautions would be taken to ensure it wasn’t misused.

Senior Solomon Islands’ political figures were startled to learn of the plan when informed of it by The Australian.

“Why would anybody, unless you are being arrested, surrender to fingerprinting? This is unheard of in the Solomon Islands’ context, let alone being promoted by police,” prominent opposition MP Peter Kenilorea told The Australian. “I’m just trying to wrap my head around this.”

The fact that the country’s government just let the Chinese police start collecting villagers’ fingerprints shows it is far too meek and trusting when dealing with the might of the communist state.

That it turns a blind eye to such an egregious intrusion suggests its instincts have been dulled by shiny new projects and political slush funds.

Australia isn’t a perfect partner to Pacific nations. It acts with self-interest, as all nations do.

But unlike China, it respects individual rights and it respects the rule of law.

This sorry story should be a lesson to Solomon Islands to ask more questions and exercise its sovereignty with far greater energy. It should also be a warning to other Pacific Island states of the dangers of getting too close to Beijing.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/world/massive-overreach-by-beijing-shocks-islands-mps/news-story/cde9456bfc06ab5f50b1b2c675212622

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122223

File: ad39615aaa85ce1⋯.jpg (92.74 KB,1024x576,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 56597792cbe45ef⋯.jpg (244.51 KB,2047x1152,2047:1152,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23590858 (130227ZSEP25) Notable: Five Labor MPs to join Premier in China with five-day trade mission - Premier Jacinta Allan will lead one of the largest Victorian Labor delegations to China, joined by parliamentary secretary Paul Hamer and backbenchers Meng Heang Tak, Mathew Hilakari, Matt Fregon and John Mullahy. The September 14–19 taxpayer-funded mission will focus on trade, education, tourism and innovation, and is viewed as a major political play to consolidate support among Chinese-Australian voters ahead of the 2026 election. Allan’s office said the mission would deliver “a new era of jobs, growth and stability” while consolidating ties with China. The trip follows Daniel Andrews’ six visits as premier, including a secretive official visit to China just months before he announced his retirement as premier.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109325 (pb)

>>109337 (pb)

>>122156

>>122162

>>122199

Five Labor MPs to join Premier in China with five-day trade mission

DAMON JOHNSTON - September 02, 2025

Jacinta Allan will lead one of the biggest delegations of Victorian Labor MPs to ever visit China with a junior minister and four backbenchers joining the Premier for her historic trip to the communist giant.

The Labor MPs represent electorates with large numbers of Chinese voters in suburbs like Box Hill, Chadstone, Mount Waverley, Glen Waverley, Ashwood, Clayton South and Vermont South and the taxpayer-funded mission is a major political play to consolidate support among Chinese-Australian voters heading into the 2026 Victorian election.

Following in the footsteps of her pro-China predecessor Daniel Andrews, Ms Allan will spend five days holding official business and education talks with the People’s Republic of China.

Responding to questions from The Australian, Ms Allan’s office confirmed on Tuesday night that she will be accompanied on the September 14-19 mission by parliamentary secretary and Box Hill MP Paul Hamer and four Labor backbenchers.

In an unusual move, Ms Allan’s office also confirmed that Labor MPs – Clarinda MP Meng Heang Tak, Point Cook MP Mathew Hilakari, Ashwood MP Matt Fregon and Glen Waverley MP John Mullahy – will join the trip.

While the four backbenchers are not considered part of the official Victorian party, their visit will overlap with the Premier’s mission and they will participate in some meetings the Premier is holding with Chinese officials when they are deemed relevant to their local communities.

“The Premier, Jacinta Allan, will travel to China to lead a trade mission, meeting with business, government, educators, and communities,” a government spokesperson told The Australian.

“The Premier will bring Victoria’s new China strategy to China. The strategy is about a new era of jobs, growth and stability for Victorian workers, and a new era of respect for Victorians from the Chinese community.”

Labor believes Ms Allan’s mission – her first major overseas trip since becoming Premier almost two years ago – will strengthen Victoria’s international partnership with China.

The trade trip will give the Labor MPs the chance to meet with Chinese business and government leaders and will focus on trade, education, tourism and innovation.

Ms Allan’s mission represents a major political step for the premier ahead of the November 28, 2026 election where thousands of Chinese-Australian voters will play a critical part in determining which party wins key seats.

Mr Andrews, during his 10 years leading the Victorian ALP in opposition and government, forged close and controversial relations with the communist-run superpower.

As Premier between 2014 and 2023, Mr Andrews visited China six times, including controversially defying the federal government and signing up Victoria to the communist giant’s “Belt and Road Initiative” investment strategy designed to spread Chinese influence through the world.

Controversially, Mr Andrews embarked on a secretive official visit to China just months before he announced his retirement as premier.

The trip was announced on a Saturday and he flew out shortly afterwards. The agenda remained a mystery. It was the first official visit by an Australian political leader since the Morrison government had signed the AUKUS defence pact in 2019, on the eve of the Covid-19 pandemic.

Since retiring from politics, Mr Andrews has established a China-focused private business in partnership with his government’s Chinese adviser, Marty Mei. Mr Mei joined Mr Andrews for most of his official trips to China as Premier.

Australian Securities & Investments Commission documents show Mr Andrews and Mr Mei are joint shareholders in Wedgetail Partners Pty Ltd.

Mr Andrews regularly travels to China now for business meetings. He is visiting Beijing this week with former NSW Premier Bob Carr to attend a military parade to mark the 80th anniversary of the end of WWII.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/jacinta-allans-big-china-play/news-story/c7e76bf20ddce0eb285ea6be255a4714

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122224

File: 97db5ad88f55d57⋯.jpg (65.18 KB,840x484,210:121,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 5e84609e57c7053⋯.jpg (83.38 KB,840x480,7:4,Clipboard.jpg)

File: b71a2fc8a1da474⋯.jpg (191.24 KB,1920x1080,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: dbd5e28068fb2e1⋯.jpg (257.72 KB,1000x787,1000:787,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23591096 (130324ZSEP25) Notable: Paedophile priest John Sidney Denham dies in prison hospital - Defrocked Catholic priest John Sidney Denham, described as one of Australia’s worst paedophiles, has died aged 82 at Long Bay prison hospital. Charged in 2008 following Strike Force Georgiana’s investigations, he was sentenced in 2010 for abusing 39 boys, with further convictions in 2015 after more victims came forward. His crimes at Newcastle’s St Pius X College in the 1970s and 80s left lasting scars, with many victims taking their own lives and one death prompting the child abuse royal commission. Former detective Kristi Faber, who led Strike Force Georgiana, called Denham “one of the worst” and said survivors’ bravery in coming forward stopped further offending. The Maitland-Newcastle Diocese acknowledged Denham as a “prolific and notorious child-abuser” and offered condolences to his victims and their families.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Paedophile priest John Sidney Denham dies in prison hospital

Giselle Wakatama and Bridget Murphy - 11 September 2025

One of Australia's most prolific paedophile priests has died in prison.

In 2008, John Sidney Denham was charged by the nation's first police strike dedicated to targeting abuse by members of the clergy.

In 2010, the defrocked Catholic priest was sentenced to 13 years and 10 months' jail for the abuse of 39 boys and was given extra jail time in 2015 after more instances of abuse came to light.

Many of Denham's victims have taken their own lives and one of the deaths sparked the child abuse royal commission.

Denham's crimes occurred mostly at Newcastle's St Pius X College, now known as Trinity College, in the 1970s and early 80s.

On Thursday, New South Wales prison officials confirmed the 82-year-old died at Long Bay on Friday.

Former detective Kristi Faber led Strike Force Georgiana and uncovered Denham's offending.

"He's definitely one of the worst paedophiles that the Catholic Church has seen and that Australia has seen," she said.

"There were 60 complainants who came forward and he was charged in relation to those.

"The staff from Georgiana spoke to many, many, many more survivors of abuse at the hands of John Denham, which was very sad to see."

'Grief and devastation'

Ms Faber said she had the victims and their families in her heart.

"The grief and devastation doesn't go away for these families and these survivors.

"For them to come forward and be so brave and then to convict a man that could have gone on and continued to offend, they should be very … proud of themselves."

A Catholic Diocese of Maitland-Newcastle spokesperson said in a statement that the diocese acknowledged Denham was a "prolific and notorious child-abuser whose role as a priest and teacher gave him access to his victims".

"The death of an abuser is likely to raise issues for their survivors, in relation to the pain and harm they and their families live with," the spokesperson said.

"Our thoughts are with all those impacted."

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-09-11/paedophile-priest-john-sidney-denham-dies-prison-hospital/105763246

https://mn.catholic.org.au/news/statement-on-the-death-of-john-sidney-denham/

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122225

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23591125 (130333ZSEP25) Notable: (2015) Priest John Sidney Denham sentenced to another 13 years jail for sexual abuse of boys - (Video) John Sidney Denham, a defrocked Catholic priest described as “sadistic,” has been sentenced to a further 13 years for abusing at least 57 boys in Newcastle between 1968 and 1986. Judge Helen Syme said the crimes, committed at St Pius X Catholic School and elsewhere, included grooming, molestation, and brutal rapes, often combined with threats and canings. She found Denham was protected by fellow priests Tom Brennan and Ron Picken, who facilitated the abuse. Showing no remorse, Denham received a maximum 19-year sentence, extending his prison term until at least 2028.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122224

Priest John Sidney Denham sentenced to another 13 years jail for sexual abuse of boys

Paul Bibby - January 23, 2015

1/2

A "sadistic" paedophile priest who repeatedly abused more than 50 young boys in the Newcastle region while being protected by two fellow priests has been sentenced to a further 13 years jail.

John Sidney Denham used his position as a parish priest and a teacher at St Pius X Catholic School at Adamstown to repeatedly assault, rape or molest at least 57 young boys without interruption for 18 years.

In the Downing Centre District Court on Friday the 73-year-old was sentenced for 48 of these offences, having already been sentenced to at least 13 years' jail for the other nine offences.

With a partial accumulation of the sentences he now will spend 19 years and five months behind bars.

"Some of the offences represent the most abhorrent and sadistic combination of circumstances that courts are likely to see," Judge Helen Syme said of the abuse as Denham sat in the dock with his head bowed.

As a number of the former priest's victims sat crying in court, Judge Syme described how, between 1968 and 1986, Denham would target young students from St Pius who came from difficult or disadvantaged backgrounds.

"The complainants were from devout Catholic families who…were required to attend school or church chosen by their parents and required to honour their priests and teachers," Judge Syme said.

"As a result they became easy prey for the offender who had to do little to gain their trust," she said.

He would then use his position to "groom" the boys and their parents, before preying on the children over and over again.

The attacks took place in Denham's office, in classrooms, outside confessional boxes, and sometimes in public places such as the playground, and ranged from touching the boy's genitals over their clothes to brutal, sadistic rapes.

Denham appeared to enjoy the pain he was inflicting, often caning the boys after sexually abusing them and then threatening further punishment if they dared to complain.

"On many occasions the offender threatened the children with further physical harm or exposure to the school community as a homosexual if they complained," Judge Syme said.

"…the offender knew any complaints would be fruitless and he occasionally taunted the children with this knowledge…saying, on one occasion, 'if you want to tell someone, tell God'."

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122226

File: dec26f2f4db6f0a⋯.jpg (884.11 KB,3888x2324,972:581,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 507481ee5d0a423⋯.jpg (1.22 MB,2505x1650,167:110,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 0e2a0ca70b266b7⋯.jpg (665.99 KB,3504x2336,3:2,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23591187 (130355ZSEP25) Notable: (2018) ‘They don't really get it’: Apology appreciated, but it won't change anything for John's family - Lou Pirona says his son John, whose 2012 suicide became the catalyst for a royal commission, was “an important cog” in exposing systemic child abuse. John, a Lake Macquarie firefighter, was 13 when he was abused by sadistic priest John Denham at St Pius X High School, protected by principal Tom Brennan. Though Pirona appreciates the government’s national apology, he and wife Pam stress it cannot ease their grief: “But it doesn’t bring John back, does it?” Pam wrote to Bishop Bill Wright after the Church admitted Brennan’s abuse, saying it was the first real acknowledgement of betrayed parental trust. Still, she believes Church leaders “don’t really get it” - the profound pain inflicted on victims and families. John’s final words, “Too much pain,” remain etched in their lives.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122224

>>122225

'They don't really get it': Apology appreciated, but it won't change anything for John's family

Joanne McCarthy - October 20, 2018

1/2

Lou Pirona’s son John has a tragic place in Australian history, as the child sexual abuse victim whose suicide in July, 2012 was the catalyst for a campaign that led to a royal commission.

“I have to recognise John’s death was an important cog in the making of the royal commission,” said Mr Pirona this week on the eve of a national apology to thousands of Australian abuse survivors.

While he appreciates and supports the apology by Prime Minister Scott Morrison in Federal Parliament on Monday, Mr Pirona will not be there. He will be camping with a friend at Barrington Tops where he took John as a child.

“I will be close to him there,” Mr Pirona said.

John Pirona was sexually abused as a student at St Pius X High School at Adamstown by notorious Catholic priest and teacher John Denham, described by a judge as a sadistic predator. Denham was protected by St Pius principal and priest Tom Brennan, recently acknowledged by the church as a child sex abuser.

Denham, 76, was found guilty on October 10 of sexually abusing his 58th victim between 1968 and 1986. John Pirona, a Lake Macquarie fire brigade officer, was 13 when Denham sexually abused him in 1979. In a statement to police John Pirona described the school as brutal, where he feared being bashed if people knew he had been abused.

“Every day to me was just survival,” he told police.

John Pirona, 45, left a suicide letter to his family that ended with the words “Too much pain”.

The then Prime Minister Julia Gillard visited Newcastle on August 8, 2012, the day of Mr Pirona’s funeral, where mourners including Lou Pirona backed the Newcastle Herald Shine the Light campaign for a royal commission.

“No person or organisation should be above or outside the law,” Lou Pirona said in front of mourners who included the then NSW Police Minister Mike Gallacher.

Mr Pirona, a retired solicitor, said the dictionary definition of “apology” was an “expression of regret offered for some fault, failure, insult or injury”.

“In that context I think it’s very appropriate that the government that represents all Australians should express its empathy or regret that circumstances have been allowed to happen in this country that’s enabled children to be sexually abused, causing some of them, like our son, to take their own life,” he said this week.

“I think my son, if he were alive, I think John would have, I think he’d appreciate it.”

Mr Pirona said his wife Pam appreciated the national apology.

“But she finishes most of our discussions with ‘But it doesn’t bring John back, does it?’, and it doesn’t. Nothing will do that. Nothing will ease the pain, and particularly of a mother,” he said.

“Pam often says, and I think it’s true, that the hierarchy of the Catholic Church can apologise until they’re blue in the face but they don’t really get it. I don’t think they really get the impact that their actions and failures have had on victims and their families.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122227

File: 082428878c4250b⋯.jpg (156.6 KB,1024x683,1024:683,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23591238 (130410ZSEP25) Notable: Police comb through 550,000 files to identify Sydney victims of alleged childcare paedophile – Federal police are sifting through 550,000 unique files, including tens of thousands of videos, allegedly linked to a Sydney childcare worker accused of filming abuse of children in his care. The man, barred from being identified under court order, faces seven charges of producing child abuse material and possession of abusive data. The Australian Federal Police say his alleged offending may mirror that of Victorian childcare worker Joshua Dale Brown. The man, who worked across multiple Sydney centres over a decade, was arrested in July and remains in custody.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109236 (pb)

>>109238 (pb)

Police comb through 550,000 files to identify Sydney victims of alleged childcare paedophile

Perry Duffin - September 11, 2025

1/2

An investigation into a Sydney childcare worker accused of filming abuse of children in his care has uncovered more than a half a million files many allegedly depicting horrific abuse, with federal police still picking through mountains of evidence to identify victims.

The man, who cannot be named under court order, was charged in July with seven counts of using a child to make abusive material – three counts were aggravated.

He was also charged with possessing child abuse data through a phone. The Australian Federal Police fear the man abused multiple children over an extended period of time, and the case could come to mirror that of Victorian childcare worker Joshua Dale Brown, 26, accused of abusing eight children in his care at the Creative Garden Early Learning Centre in Point Cook.

Brown had worked across 20 Melbourne childcare centres since 2017, and Victoria’s Health Department recommended sexual disease tests for 1200 children as part of the investigation.

A court order, sought by the AFP, prevents the Sydney man from being identified to safeguard the investigation and prevent “psychological harm” to the alleged victims.

But the Herald can reveal police seized multiple devices which allegedly contained more than 1.4 million files. Many are duplicates, and investigations have now allegedly identified a pool of 550,000 unique images, including tens of thousands of videos which contains abuse material.

“The number of files does not provide any indication of the scale of the alleged offending. Rather, this indicates the volume of work required by investigators from the AFP’s Victim Identification Team,” AFP Detective Superintendent Luke Needham said.

It’s unclear how many of those files were allegedly created by the man using children he had access to, and how many were allegedly downloaded or shared with him.

The childcare worker came to the notice of police only after uploading abuse images to a cloud server.

The man worked at multiple daycare centres around Sydney over more than a decade in the industry. They, too, cannot be identified under the court order.

Some centres where the man worked have been advised of his arrest, but police are still working to identify potential victims and have yet to contact families directly. Multiple government agencies, including NSW Health, police and community teams have been briefed to support affected families once they are identified by investigators.

The Sydney man will face Parramatta Local Court on Friday, but has been in prison since July and poses “no ongoing threat to the community”, the AFP said at the time of his arrest.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122228

File: c46aa0a354387fb⋯.jpg (1.18 MB,3000x2000,3:2,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23591389 (130452ZSEP25) Notable: Marine Corps Ospreys to remain in Australia after annual rotation ends - U.S. Marine Corps MV-22B Ospreys will stay in Australia after this year’s Marine Rotational Force-Darwin ends, the Defence Department confirmed. The tiltrotors, part of rotations since 2017, will be prepositioned at Toowoomba Wellcamp Airport to reduce transport costs, ease border burdens, and boost availability for training with Australian forces. Marines will conduct inspections before contracted support assumes maintenance. Australian army Brig. Gen. Mick Say said the move “represents the continuing development of a deeper relationship with the United States.” The plan sits alongside other U.S. posture initiatives, including future submarine rotations under AUKUS.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109310 (pb)

>>109558 (pb)

>>109495 (pb)

>>122212

Marine Corps Ospreys to remain in Australia after annual rotation ends

SETH ROBSON, STARS AND STRIPES - September 11, 2025

U.S. Marine Corps MV-22B Osprey tiltrotors will stay in Australia when a rotational force returns home this fall, according to the country’s defense department.

Marines have been deploying annually to the Northern Territory on six-month rotations since 2012. This year’s Marine Rotational Force-Darwin includes 2,500 Marines.

Tiltrotors have been part of the rotations since 2017, when they arrived at Royal Australian Air Force Base Darwin.

The green light to store and maintain the Ospreys was announced Thursday in an Australian Defence Department news release.

“At the conclusion of this year’s 14th MRF-D rotation, MV-22 aircraft will remain behind in Australia,” the department said. “This will increase availability of the aircraft for training, significantly reduce transportation costs, and remove the import-related impost on Australian border agencies.”

The Ospreys will be positions at Toowoomba Wellcamp Airport, Queensland, Capt. Johnny Fischer, a spokesman for the rotational force, said by email Thursday.

“Initially, Marines will handle maintenance and preparation, with contracted support assuming sustainment responsibilities later,” he said. “Before returning to flight, each Osprey will undergo comprehensive inspections, system checks, and test procedures conducted by certified Marine Corps professionals.”

Prepositioned American military equipment played a role in the biennial Talisman Sabre drills, involving more than 40,000 troops from the United States, Australia and 17 other nations training across the southern continent from July 13 to Aug. 4.

The exercise marked the first major movement of prepositioned U.S. gear from South Australia to the country’s northeast, Maj. Adan Cazarez, a spokesman for the 8th Theater Sustainment Command in Hawaii, said by email July 22. He declined to discuss specifics of the equipment for security reasons.

Operating primarily out of Darwin and the northern Australian training areas, the Marines use MV-22s to maintain security, work with Australian forces and provide a platform for the Marines to engage with partners across the region, according to the Australian news release.

In July, four Ospreys from Marine Medium Tiltrotor Squadron 363 flew from Australia to Clark Air Base in the Philippines to participate in a relief mission following typhoons, tropical storms and monsoon rains in the country’s north.

Leaving Ospreys in Australia “represents the continuing development of a deeper relationship with the United States,” Australian army Brig. Gen. Mick Say, director-general of the Force Posture Initiatives Branch, said in the release.

The initiatives encompass the Marine Corps rotations along with U.S. aircraft rotations and infrastructure improvements to bases in Australia’s north.

Other U.S. systems may be positioned in Australia, bringing with them significantly more American personnel, former Australian assistant defense secretary Ross Babbage said in an email Thursday.

He pointed to plans for a rotational force of four U.S. and British nuclear-powered submarines in Western Australia as early as 2027. That presence stems from the 2021 AUKUS security pact among Australia, the United Kingdom and the United States.

The Pentagon is reviewing the agreement amid concerns over whether U.S. industry can deliver submarines to Australia in the coming years while still meeting Navy requirements.

“Skilled personnel are capable of maintaining most of these systems in Darwin, Perth and elsewhere,” Babbage said. “Where deeper skills and expertise is needed for systems, such as the MV-22 Osprey, there should be few difficulties extending the substantial helicopter and other maintenance skill pools as may be needed in the period ahead.”

https://www.stripes.com/theaters/asia_pacific/2025-09-11/marine-ospreys-storage-maintenance-australia-19051531.html

https://x.com/kiddaaron/status/1966038140625604870

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122229

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23591551 (130534ZSEP25) Notable: Video: Court finds Brittany Higgins made false claims in media interviews - The WA Supreme Court has ruled that Brittany Higgins’ 2021 media interviews about her alleged rape in Parliament House contained 26 “false or misleading aspects” that could not be solely explained by trauma. Justice Paul Tottle found Higgins had “demonstrated such an indifference to the truth that her account… can only be regarded as dishonest,” especially in portraying a political cover-up by then Liberal senator Linda Reynolds. He said Higgins embellished and speculated, passing off speculation as fact. Higgins has been ordered to pay Reynolds more than $340,000 in damages and interest. Justice Tottle found Reynolds an honest witness overall, though her testimony was sometimes discursive and reflected a politician’s instinct to defend her conduct.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Court finds Brittany Higgins made false claims in media interviews

PAUL GARVEY - August 27, 2025

1/2

Brittany Higgins’ account in media interviews about being raped in Parliament House contained “dishonest”, “objectively untrue and misleading” statements that could not solely be attributed to trauma, the WA Supreme Court has found.

The judgment delivered in Perth on Wednesday morning by Justice Paul Tottle made a series of scathing findings about the credibility of Ms Higgins, who has now been ordered to pay more than $340,000 in damages and interest to Linda Reynolds after the court found she had defamed her former employer.

While Ms Higgins did not testify in court during the five-week trial, Justice Tottle made extensive findings about her credibility based on evidence tendered during the case – identifying no fewer than 26 different “false or misleading aspects” from the media interviews when she first went public with her allegation she was raped by co-worker Bruce Lehrmann.

Justice Tottle found that in her efforts to lend credibility to the allegation of a political cover-up by Ms Reynolds, then a Liberal senator, over her alleged Parliament House rape, Ms Higgins had “demonstrated such an indifference to the truth that her account of the essential elements of the allegation can only be regarded as dishonest”.

He said that while he accepted that Ms Higgins had episodes of profound psychological distress arising from the rape and its aftermath, he was unable to rely on her evidence “in any respect” unless it was corroborated by other reliable evidence or was consistent with facts established by independent evidence.

“That the defendant’s evidence of the immediate aftermath of the rape was unreliable was entirely understandable,” Justice Tottle wrote.

“It is more difficult, however, to explain other aspects of the 2021 account given by the defendant, which were objectively untrue and misleading, as being attributable to the effects of trauma.”

The judge found that Ms Higgins’ version of events in the interviews she gave to journalists Samantha Maiden and Lisa Wilkinson differed so markedly from the objective facts that the differences could not sensibly be attributed to difficulties in recollection.

“Further, the extent to which the defendant embellished and speculated and passed her speculation off as fact rendered her account tendentious,” he wrote.

He identified at least eight examples of what he described as Ms Higgins’ “willingness to speculate and embellish”, particularly in regards to her claim that Ms Reynolds had tried to “cover up” Ms Higgins’ alleged rape.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122230

File: 263447b9fb763bd⋯.jpg (123.28 KB,1280x720,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: ee40a7888ab3817⋯.jpg (154.27 KB,1080x1440,3:4,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23591587 (130544ZSEP25) Notable: Brittany Higgins could lose $2.4m payout after Linda Reynolds’ defamation win – A WA Supreme Court judgment has found Brittany Higgins made “objectively untrue and misleading” statements in media interviews and social media posts to bolster her false claim of a political cover-up, awarding Linda Reynolds more than $340,000 in damages and interest. Justice Paul Tottle said Higgins’ efforts to lend credibility to her story showed “indifference to the truth”, identifying 26 false or misleading aspects in her public accounts. The ruling threatens Higgins’ $2.4m commonwealth compensation payment, with Reynolds’ lawyers signalling they may pursue her trust assets. Reynolds declared her reputation “finally and fully vindicated”, while Higgins issued a statement expressing gratitude the matter had concluded.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122229

Brittany Higgins could lose $2.4m payout after Linda Reynolds’ defamation win

PAUL GARVEY - August 27, 2025

1/2

Brittany Higgins made objectively false statements to bolster an untrue claim of a political cover-up of her rape allegation, a West Australian ­Supreme Court judge has ruled, in a crippling verdict that has shredded her credibility, threatens her $2.4m commonwealth compensation payment and could send her into bankruptcy.

In a devastating conclusion to a defamation action that could have been resolved during its lengthy mediation process, Justice Paul Tottle on Wednesday found Ms Higgins defamed her former boss, Linda Reynolds, through social media posts, awarding the ex-senator more than $340,000 in damages and interest.

Justice Tottle also found Ms Higgins made “objectively untrue and misleading” statements around the time of her 2021 interview on Network Ten’s The Project, which – unlike unreliable statements made immediately after she was allegedly raped by Bruce Lehrmann – could not be attributed to the “effects of trauma”.

Ms Reynolds’ legal team on Wednesday indicated it would seek indemnity costs from Ms Higgins, and flagged it was willing to pursue further proceedings to access the trust holding her assets if necessary.

Speaking outside court after her victory, Ms Reynolds said she felt “great relief” that her reputation had been “finally and fully vindicated”, years after Ms Higgins went public with her allegations that the senator had engaged in a cover-up of her alleged rape by co-worker Mr Lehrmann inside the then senator’s Parliament House office.

“However, it is disappointing that it took 4½ years, multiple court actions and millions of dollars,” she said.

Court observers estimated that Ms Reynolds’ legal costs alone were likely to run to at least several hundred thousand dollars, if not into seven figures, and the result meant Ms Higgins was likely to have to cover most if not all of those as well as the cost of her own unsuccessful defence. Ms Higgins and husband David Sharaz had already previously put her home in France up for sale due to mounting legal costs.

The bulk of the $2.4m compensation payment made by the commonwealth to Ms Higgins in December 2022 was moved into a trust, and Ms Reynolds’ lawyer Martin Bennett indicated that he would pursue proceedings to access that trust if necessary.

“We will jump off that bridge when we get to it,” Mr Bennett said.

Speaking to reporters outside court, Ms Reynolds – who retired from the Senate earlier this year – criticised the federal government and Labor over their “gross politicisation” of Ms Higgins’ rape complaint.

Ms Higgins initially claimed that Ms Reynolds and the Morrison government had engaged in a cover-up of her alleged rape, a claim later repeated in parliament by Labor ministers Penny Wong and Katy Gallagher.

In the judgment delivered on Wednesday, Justice Tottle found the cover-up allegation had no foundation in fact.

The offices of Senator Wong and Senator Gallagher were contacted for comment.

Ms Reynolds said while she was not expecting an apology from Labor over its role “in this completely fabricated ‘Me Too’ political hit job”, the government and its lawyers should be looking closely at Justice Tottle’s findings.

“I was falsely accused of conspiring with the then prime minister to cover up the rape of a young woman in my office. This lie was so shocking, it was so despicable, and so devastating that I had no choice but to stand up tall and keep fighting, no matter how many times I was knocked down,” Ms Reynolds said.

“This lie devastated me. It devastated my staff, it devastated my family and so many friends.

“But let me be very, very clear today. This was never about Ms Higgins’ allegation of rape. And it was also never about the money. This action was always, it was always, about the dishonest and devastating attack on my reputation that was based on very carefully curated lies by Ms Higgins, Mr Sharaz and the well-documented co-conspirators with them.”

Justice Tottle ruled that Ms Higgins and Mr Sharaz had defamed Ms Reynolds in a January 2022 Twitter post that carried the imputation that Ms Reynolds had pressured Ms Higgins not to proceed with a genuine sexual assault complaint and was a hypocrite. Ms Reynolds was awarded $135,000 in damages for that post.

He also found Ms Higgins had defamed Ms Reynolds in a social media post that carried the imputation that the senator had engaged in a campaign of harassment, had mishandled Ms Higgins’ rape allegation, and engaged in questionable conduct during the trial. He awarded Ms Reynolds $180,000 in damages on that issue.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122231

File: 4252a39345b39fd⋯.jpg (256.54 KB,1280x960,4:3,Clipboard.jpg)

File: d21c1cc9c7b327e⋯.jpg (273.32 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23591612 (130550ZSEP25) Notable: Albanese must ‘accept responsibility for Higgins’ lies’: Reynolds – Linda Reynolds has urged the Albanese government to accept responsibility for “enabling Ms Higgins to perpetuate her lies” after Justice Paul Tottle’s ruling cleared her and ex-chief of staff Fiona Brown of any cover-up. In a statement to The Australian, Reynolds said Brittany Higgins and David Sharaz “concocted a deliberate plan” to weaponise rape allegations for political purposes, with 26 false or misleading statements identified in Higgins’ media interviews. Reynolds said the $2.4m commonwealth settlement with Higgins rested on “untrue” claims and insisted Labor’s handling of the matter compounded the damage to her reputation.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122229

>>122230

Albanese must ‘accept responsibility for Higgins’ lies’: Reynolds

STEPHEN RICE - August 27, 2025

1/2

Linda Reynolds has welcomed the finding by Justice Paul Tottle that she was not involved in any political cover up of Brittany Higgins’ rape and called on the Albanese government to accept responsibility for “enabling Ms Higgins to perpetuate her lies”.

In a detailed statement provided exclusively to The Australian, Ms Reynolds expresses her relief at the finding that Ms Higgins and her partner David Sharaz concocted a deliberate plan to weaponise Ms Higgins’ legitimate rape allegations for a false political purpose.

Justice Tottle found that “the allegation of a cover-up had no foundation in fact and the allegation of inadequate support was based on an incomplete and misleading account of the facts”.

Justice Tottle found that “the simple but untrue story” that Ms Reynolds had been involved in the cover-up of the rape of Ms Higgins by a ‘rising star’ of the Liberal Party was so sensational and achieved such currency it was impossible for her to defend herself.

Justice Tottle’s judgment also cleared Ms Reynolds’ then chief of staff Fiona Brown of any involvement in a cover-up.

“Justice Tottle has definitively established the truth,” Ms Reynolds said. “The allegation of a political cover-up has had a tremendous adverse effect on not only me but also on Ms Brown for whom I care very deeply.

“I am profoundly pleased that his Honour, like Justice Lee, has found so clearly in favour of Ms Brown’s recollection of the events.”

In his 360-page judgment, Justice Tottle identified 26 statements made by Ms Higgins in her media interviews that were objectively false or misleading and “so indifferent to the truth that they could only be regarded as dishonest”.

Ms Reynolds noted that these claims ultimately formed the foundation for Ms Higgins’ civil claim against the commonwealth, which resulted in a $2.4 million settlement by the Labor government.

Justice Tottle concluded that Ms Higgins’ account of how she was treated could not be attributed to difficulties in recollection and that Ms Higgins was “plainly dishonest”.

“It was vitally important for me to establish in a manner binding upon Ms Higgins (who was not a party to the proceedings before Justice Lee) that her statements concerning me were false and dishonest,” Ms Reynolds said.

“It was clear to me that Ms Higgins’ attack on me was not going to end without a binding judgment. She had evidenced her intention to write a book and engage in public speaking activities as an advocate of the victims of rape and for workplace reform.

“It was therefore essential for me to protect and restore my reputation and stop her from continuing to perpetuate her false and dishonest allegations about me.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122232

File: 353142752b45a6a⋯.jpg (467.67 KB,2160x1441,2160:1441,Clipboard.jpg)

File: b9a9b3dcfe53088⋯.jpg (2.54 MB,5000x3333,5000:3333,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23591631 (130600ZSEP25) Notable: Brittany Higgins ordered to pay 80 per cent of Linda Reynolds’ legal costs – Brittany Higgins has been ordered to pay most of Linda Reynolds’s legal costs in their defamation battle, with the bill expected to exceed $1m. Justice Paul Tottle ruled Ms Higgins must cover 80 per cent after finding her 2022–23 social media posts defamed her former boss. Ms Reynolds was previously awarded $315,000 in damages plus $26,000 interest. A proposed settlement before trial, offering $200,000 and a joint “statement of mutual regret,” was deemed unreasonable as it failed to vindicate Ms Reynolds’s reputation. Reynolds is also pursuing separate legal action over Higgins’s $2.4m commonwealth payout.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122229

>>122230

>>122231

Brittany Higgins ordered to pay 80 per cent of Linda Reynolds's legal costs

Andrea Mayes - 9 September 2025

1/2

Brittany Higgins has been ordered to pay the lion's share of her former boss Linda Reynolds's legal expenses in their blockbuster defamation trial that concluded last month, which Ms Reynolds's lawyer said would exceed $1 million.

Justice Paul Tottle ruled in August that Ms Higgins had defamed Ms Reynolds in a series of social media posts, and today ruled that she must pay 80 per cent of her former employer's legal costs.

The exact amount was not disclosed.

Ms Reynolds, who has now retired from politics, successfully sued Ms Higgins over three social media posts 2022 and 2023, and was awarded $315,000 in damages plus $26,000 in interest.

The former senator argued the posts trashed her reputation and caused her immense distress, following a period of ill health.

Ms Higgins had sought to have costs limited to two-thirds of Ms Reynolds's expenses, and wanted her lawyer Martin Bennett's fees capped at a maximum of $781 per hour.

Ms Reynolds had argued that Mr Bennett's fees not be capped, and that the costs order include the expenses incurred by hiring a full legal team, including two instructing solicitors, another lawyer and a paralegal.

Ms Reynolds’s lawyer Martin Bennett told the ABC the cost order would exceed $1 million.

Mr Bennett said Ms Reynolds “is pleased with the order made by his Honour today concerning the payment of her significant costs incurred in this action”.

Attempted settlement on eve of trial

In the judgement released on Tuesday, it was revealed that in July last year, four days before the defamation trial opened, Ms Higgins offered to settle the entire matter with a $200,000 payment towards Ms Reynolds's legal fees, to be paid by her parents.

The settlement, which was labelled "unreasonable" by Justice Tottle, was to have included a "statement of mutual regret" from both women and a payment of $10,000 to a Queensland women's refuge.

The proposed statement would have included wording that stated "Senator Reynolds recognises that the disputes have resulted in hurt and distress for Ms Higgins" and "acknowledges that Ms Higgins genuinely believed that adequate support had not been provided by her employer following the events of 23 March 2019".

It would also have included an acknowledgement by Ms Higgins "that Senator Reynolds was distressed by social media posts in relation to the matter and ... that she and her staff had provided appropriate support to Ms Higgins".

It stated that both women "agree to put these matter behind them and move on".

But Justice Tottle said the "offer did not provide the plaintiff with any vindication of her reputation".

He said the statement of mutual regret "fell short of an apology by a substantial margin" and "would have conveyed the defendant maintained the truth of the defamatory statements made by her."

He said the offer did not therefore qualify as a reasonable settlement offer within the meaning of the Defamation Act.

"I am satisfied the defendant's failure to make a settlement offer was unreasonable," he said.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122233

File: 34c018b398ea0d3⋯.mp4 (4.78 MB,406x720,203:360,Clipboard.mp4)

File: 6b311112b8010c9⋯.jpg (92.19 KB,1280x720,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: a81b174935606e4⋯.jpg (236.4 KB,1280x720,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 7c51fd82c0a9086⋯.jpg (160.68 KB,1280x720,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23591692 (130631ZSEP25) Notable: Video: Trump calls Albanese 'a good man' after latest call – Donald Trump praised Anthony Albanese as “a good man” after their fourth phone call, which the prime minister described as “really warm.” The leaders have yet to meet in person, after a planned G7 sit-down was cancelled due to Middle East conflict. While ties remain respectful, tensions persist over tariffs on Australian exports, defence spending, and AUKUS submarine funding. Labor’s recognition of a Palestinian state at the UN prompted “disappointment and disgust” within the Trump administration. A Pentagon review of the submarine deal is underway, with analysts warning Washington may demand Australia boost its contribution to U.S. shipbuilding.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122175

>>122176

Trump calls Albanese 'a good man' after latest call

Tess Ikonomou - Sep 12, 2025

US President Donald Trump has praised Anthony Albanese as a "good man" after the two leaders racked up their fourth one-on-one phone call.

The prime minister described his latest conversation with Mr Trump more than a week ago as "really warm".

The US president was leaving the White House overnight on Friday, Australian time, when he made the comments about Mr Albanese.

"He’s a good man," he told a Nine correspondent.

Mr Albanese is yet to have a face-to-face meeting with Mr Trump after their previously planned sit-down, on the sidelines of the G7 in Canada in June, was cancelled due to escalating conflict between Israel and Iran.

The federal government is yet to confirm any new face-to-face between the pair when the prime minister visits New York later in September for the United Nations General Assembly meeting.

Mr Trump has publicly remained positive about Mr Albanese, although tensions remain over tariffs imposed on Australian exports and a multibillion-dollar submarine deal under the AUKUS security pact.

Under the tariffs regime, Australian goods sent to the US attract a baseline levy of 10 per cent while importers of Australian steel and aluminium pay 50 per cent.

Responding to the US president's comments, Mr Albanese said he's had "respectful relations" with Mr Trump.

"We have had four discussions that have been really warm, the last one was just over a week ago," he told reporters in Cairns on Friday.

"I look forward to continuing to engage with the United States.

"We've engaged as well with his administration.

"The relationship with the United States is an important one for Australia."

Australia will continue to make its case on the tariffs and advocate for the AUKUS pact, the prime minister said.

The White House has not yet provided an official readout on the call.

Australia has diverged from the US on the Middle East, following Labor's decision to recognise a Palestinian state at the UN gathering.

The decision has drawn expressions of "disappointment and disgust" from those within the Trump administration.

Disagreements also remain over Australia's defence spending after the government rebuffed US calls to pour in billions of extra dollars.

Defence Minister Richard Marles was told by his US counterpart Pete Hegseth to massively boost the defence budget to 3.5 per cent of gross domestic product.

Australia currently spends about two per cent of its GDP on defence, and is on track to increase that to 2.33 per cent by 2033/34.

The government also awaits the findings of a Pentagon review into the nuclear submarine deal, under which Australia has been promised Virginia-class boats.

Defence analysts doubt the Trump administration will tear up the $368 billion submarine program, but might demand a larger financial contribution from Australia for US shipbuilding.

https://aapnews.aap.com.au/news/trump-calls-albanese-a-good-man-after-latest-call/JlpdAuWQy

https://www.theage.com.au/national/australia-news-live-college-age-suspect-identified-in-kirk-assassination-ley-contemplates-reshuffle-after-price-dismissal-20250912-p5mugb.html?post=p598jj#p598jj

https://www.instagram.com/theageaustralia/reel/DOetpP6kqdd/

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122234

File: c007da0f4f41f59⋯.jpg (116.6 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 7d8e50d09b2100d⋯.jpg (381.86 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: ac688d03d701e99⋯.jpg (291.74 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23598061 (140829ZSEP25) Notable: Melbourne neo-Nazi leader Thomas Sewell sentenced to community work for intimidating police officer - Neo-Nazi leader Thomas Sewell has been sentenced to 200 hours of community service after being found guilty of intimidating a police officer and the officer’s wife. On a podcast, he threatened to “dox” them, declaring “we’ve got it all downloaded, we’ve got it all saved.” Magistrate Michelle Hodgson said “words can be a potent form of intimidation and don’t require an overt threat,” rejecting his argument that the conduct was “lawful activism.” She noted his history of violence showed a disregard for safety. Sewell remains on remand over allegations he stormed Camp Sovereignty during an anti-immigration rally, with the order to be served after release.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122149

>>122150

>>122188

>>122189

Melbourne neo-Nazi leader Thomas Sewell sentenced to community work for intimidating police officer

LIAM BEATTY - September 12, 2025

1/2

Neo-Nazi leader Thomas Sewell has avoided jail after seeking to “weaponise” personal information to intimidate a police officer who allegedly tried to pull down face coverings at a protest.

The 32-year-old leader of the National Socialist Network (NSN) returned to the Melbourne Magistrates Court on Friday afternoon following two weeks of hearings on seven charges.

Part way through the hearings, Sewell was remanded into custody on allegations he was involved in storming Camp Sovereignty during an anti-immigration rally on August 31.

Entering court wearing a black jacket bearing the NSN emblem on one sleeve and the Union Jack in the shape of a shield on the other, Sewell greeted about a dozen supporters with a smile and wave.

Handing down her verdicts, Magistrate Michelle Hodgson found Sewell guilty on two charges of using intimidation towards a law enforcement officer and one count of intimidating the officer’s wife.

He was also found guilty of breaching a person safety intervention order made to protect the officer by publishing information about the protected person.

But Ms Hodgson found Sewell not guilty of two counts of getting another person to publish information about the officer and his wife and a separate charge of failing to provide police with the access code for his phone.

One member of Sewell’s outfit was arrested leaving court for the lunch break. Others were barred from re-entering the building.

Prosecutors have called for him to be given a jail term over the offending, while Sewell, who is representing himself, argued a fine was appropriate.

Sewell submitted his “malicious utterances” about the officer were at the lower end of the scale of seriousness.

“In terms of rationale for the offending, I think it’s very clear and evidence that I was extremely frustrated and that I was angry,” he said.

Melissa Mahady, for the prosecution, said the offending was inherently serious, arguing Sewell’s threat to “dox” the officer and his wife was a “serious threat”.

Sentencing Sewell, Ms Hodgson denounced his actions and said his history of violence suggests a willingness to disregard the safety of others.

“The evidence suggests in your own mind you view the conduct as lawful activism rather than criminal intimidation,” she said.

“(But) it is the court’s role to determine the boundaries of lawful conduct.”

Ms Hodgson rejected his claim the offending was on the lower end of seriousness, saying words can be a “potent form of intimidation and don’t require an overt threat for the conduct to be considered serious”.

Sewell was sentenced to 200 hours of community service to be served over 18 months after his release from custody.

He will not be released as he remains on remand on other charges.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122235

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23598112 (140855ZSEP25) Notable: Video: Scuffles break out as four competing rallies converge on Melbourne - Thousands of protesters gathered in Melbourne’s CBD for four separate rallies, with scuffles breaking out despite the majority remaining peaceful. Two anti-racism marches, including a “Rally against racism” and a “Sovereignty never ceded” protest, converged with anti-government demonstrations outside parliament. Police deployed 600 officers, using capsicum spray several times and arresting one man for criminal damage. Anti-racism organisers claimed up to 10,000 attended, though police estimated 2500. Speakers denounced neo-Nazis, chanted “Nazi scum off our streets,” while anti-government groups railed against media, vaccines and government, joined by former MP Bernie Finn.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122143

>>122207

Scuffles break out as four competing rallies converge on Melbourne

Bianca Hall and Carla Jaeger - September 13, 2025

1/2

Chaotic scenes unfolded across Melbourne on Saturday as scuffles broke out between agitators from largely peaceful rallies that drew thousands of people to the CBD.

Victoria Police said 600 officers patrolled four separate protests, including two anti-racism marches sparked by the prominence of neo-Nazis at last month’s March for Australia demonstrations, and two anti-government rallies.

Public transport was brought to a standstill across every tram line in the city for hours, while shops closed their doors and bemused locals and tourists watched.

Outside the Victorian parliament, anti-authoritarian rallies were staged under the banners of “Save Australia” and “Australia unites against government corruption”, but organisers said the groups were not connected.

At Flinders Street Station, thousands joined two anti-racism rallies under the “Rally against racism” banner, and a separate “Sovereignty never ceded” demonstration, which demanded an end to attacks like last fortnight’s assault on Camp Sovereignty in King’s Domain.

Police turned out in force to keep rival protest groups separate, forming a no-go zone on Spring Street outside the Princess Theatre between the anti-racism protesters who had marched from Flinders Street, and anti-government demonstrators outside parliament.

But minor scuffles broke out, with some anti-government protesters yelling racist profanities, and anti-racism protesters denouncing people as “Nazis”.

Victoria Police said a 29-year-old man was arrested for criminal damage after an alleged graffiti incident, before being released on summons.

Anti-racism rally organisers claim as many as 10,000 people gathered outside Flinders Street Station, but police estimate 2500 people joined the separate marches across the city.

Both protests splintered into smaller groups by mid-afternoon, funnelling down Bourke and Little Bourke streets, before facing off on Swanston Street where there were several altercations.

Police deployed capsicum spray several times, including on one man sprayed in the face at close range.

The anti-racism rallies, organised by a coalition of groups, opened with messages of unity from speakers as thousands gathered at the steps of Flinders Street Station. “We love everybody, we have no division, we welcome everybody,” an organiser said.

The vast majority of protesters who marched from Flinders Street to the edge of Spring Street were peaceful, waving Aboriginal, Palestinian and LGBTQ+ flags, and leading chants including “Nazi scum off our streets” and “always was, always will be Aboriginal land”.

Similarly, the overwhelming majority of protesters outside parliament were peaceful, although agitators were present in both groups.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122236

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23598204 (141006ZSEP25) Notable: Video: Government pledges $12b to nuclear submarine precinct ahead of PM’s US visit - The Albanese government will commit $12 billion to the Henderson Defence Precinct in Perth, funding new graving docks for nuclear submarine maintenance under AUKUS. The move comes as US officials, including Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth, push Australia to lift defence spending from 2 per cent to 3.5 per cent of GDP. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese will unveil the investment with Defence Minister Richard Marles before travelling to New York for the UN General Assembly and a long-delayed meeting with President Donald Trump. The site will support submarine docking, shipbuilding, and create more than 10,000 local jobs.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122177

>>122210

Government pledges $12b to nuclear submarine precinct ahead of PM’s US visit

Nick Newling and James Massola - September 13, 2025

1/2

The federal government will commit $12 billion to the construction of the Henderson Defence Precinct in Perth, including graving docks for nuclear submarine maintenance, in a move that will be warmly welcomed by the Trump administration.

The pledge comes as US media reports that Secretary of State Marco Rubio has assured Australia that its promise to supply nuclear submarines as part of the AUKUS pact is on track, despite a Pentagon review of the multibillion-dollar deal.

Key US officials including Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth have demanded Australia boost its defence spending from 2 per cent to 3.5 per cent of GDP and, armed with the $12 billion promise, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese will fly to the US next Saturday for the UN General Assembly leaders’ week in New York and a widely expected and much delayed meeting with President Donald Trump.

The investment in the Perth site will be announced on Sunday by Albanese and Defence Minister Richard Marles, bolstering the government’s investment in Western Australia as a defence hub under AUKUS.

It follows an earlier offering of $127 million for planning of the site, and an $8 billion investment in the nearby HMAS Stirling base.

“Today’s investment is another way we are delivering record defence funding to bolster Australia’s capabilities,” Albanese will say. “This world-class precinct will create more than 10,000 local jobs and strong opportunities for local industry.”

Nuclear-powered submarines delivered under the AUKUS pact will use the site for contingency docking, with surface vessels employed by the Australian Defence Force built on site alongside domestic elements of general purpose frigates.

In addition to flying to New York, Albanese is also tipped to fly to Washington for a potential first meeting with Trump and then on to Britain to meet Prime Minister Keir Starmer in London.

Albanese was supposed to meet Trump at a G7 summit in Canada several months ago, but the president cancelled at short notice because of the war in the Middle East. The pair have spoken on the phone four times.

There has been significant pressure from the US administration for Australia to raise its defence budget beyond the current level of about 2 per cent of GDP to 3.5 per cent, led by Hegseth. Albanese has resisted the move, saying the defence budget is a matter for his government alone to determine.

The increase pushed by the Trump administration would cost the budget an additional $210 billion over the next decade, and bring defence spending in line with the amount the government already pledges to aged care.

Most NATO nations, apart from Spain, committed to spending 3.5 per cent of GDP on defence earlier this year, and up to 5 per cent with the inclusion of defence infrastructure. Australia’s spending on defence rises to about 2.8 per cent, by some expert estimates, when infrastructure spending is included.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122237

File: fa160f98b853dff⋯.jpg (2.81 MB,3000x1735,600:347,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23598213 (141013ZSEP25) Notable: Rubio quietly signals U.S. won’t sink submarine deal with Australia - U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has privately assured Deputy Prime Minister Richard Marles that the AUKUS nuclear submarine pact will proceed, despite a Pentagon review ordered by policy chief Elbridge Colby. The reassurance followed concerns President Donald Trump was unfamiliar with the deal, though Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth later confirmed his support. Analysts say abandoning AUKUS would damage U.S. credibility and weaken Indo-Pacific security. While timelines may be adjusted, the core commitment to supply Virginia-class submarines remains, with Australia also investing $3 billion in U.S. shipyards and pursuing Ghost Shark underwater attack drones.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109594 (pb)

>>122177

>>122236

Rubio quietly signals U.S. won’t sink submarine deal with Australia

The multibillion-dollar, Biden-era AUKUS agreement to sell Australia nuclear-powered submarines is under Pentagon review, worrying allies about Washington’s commitment to regional defense.

Noah Robertson and Ellen Nakashima - 13 Sep 2025

1/2

Secretary of State Marco Rubio privately reassured a top Australian official that a deal to provide the U.S. ally with nuclear-powered submarines, which is under review by the Pentagon, will not be terminated, according to six people familiar with the matter.

The pact between the United States, Britain and Australia — or AUKUS, after the initials of the three countries — would bring Canberra into an exclusive club of nations possessing the powerful weapons platform. The Pentagon this year began a review of the multibillion-dollar deal, prompting concerns that the administration might abandon the project.

But two weeks ago, Rubio, who is also national security adviser, told Australia’s deputy prime minister, Richard Marles, in Washington that the submarine partnership would continue, according to the people familiar with the conversation, who like others interviewed for this article spoke on the condition of anonymity because of the matter’s sensitivity.

Marles’s trip was intended to gauge the administration’s support for AUKUS and lay the groundwork for what Canberra hopes will be a summit between Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and President Donald Trump later this month, according to several of the people.

Some of the uncertainty around that support stemmed from the official review, launched by the Pentagon’s policy chief, Elbridge Colby, a previous critic of the submarine deal’s practicality. In February, Trump did not appear to know what AUKUS was during an Oval Office meeting with British Prime Minister Keir Starmer. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth later said that Trump was “very aware, supportive of” the agreement. Trump also expressed support for the deal at the Group of Seven meeting in June. “We’re proceeding with that,” he said, speaking beside Starmer.

“The State Department is coordinating closely with the Department of War as it conducts its review of AUKUS,” a senior administration official said in a statement. “We remain committed to working with Australia to strengthen and advance the alliance.”

The Australian Embassy in Washington declined to comment. The Pentagon and State Department did not comment.

“Basically the message to the Australians is it’s going to be fine,” said a defense expert familiar with the administration’s thinking.

The AUKUS pact was announced four years ago by the three countries’ then leaders: President Joe Biden, British Prime Minister Boris Johnson and Australian Prime Minister Scott Morrison. It calls for the U.S. to sell state-of-the-art Virginia-class attack subs to Australia beginning in the early 2030s until the Australians can develop the capacity to build their own British-designed model with either U.S. or British nuclear propulsion technology. That idea is for the latter to happen by the 2040s.

The agreement was intended to reinforce the military capabilities of U.S. allies in the Indo-Pacific and signal a strong collective effort to counter China’s increasingly bold power projection in the region.

Nuclear propulsion provides submarines with exceptional endurance and operational flexibility, allowing them to remain submerged for months, limiting detection and increasing stealth.

Reaffirming AUKUS, or a rebranded version that carries Trump’s imprimatur, “will be a very positive step that will boost the U.S. industrial base, strengthen one of the U.S.’s closest allies and stabilize the region,” said Charles Edel, Australia chair at the Center for Strategic and International Studies in Washington.

If it falters, the U.S. becomes “less capable, less present” and its international credibility will “take a big hit,” he said.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122238

File: 1f5e4683a732663⋯.jpg (225.18 KB,1200x802,600:401,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 48b5d4c8e83429e⋯.jpg (1.82 MB,3246x2435,3246:2435,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 8deb1bcde09fd54⋯.jpg (107.75 KB,800x534,400:267,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23598215 (141015ZSEP25) Notable: Australia and Papua New Guinea to 'totally integrate' military in defence treaty, minister says - Australia and Papua New Guinea are set to sign a landmark defence treaty that will see their militaries “totally integrated,” allowing joint recruitment, shared bases, and even a pathway to Australian citizenship for Papua New Guineans who serve in the ADF. PNG Defence Minister Billy Joseph said the pact was a “mutual defence treaty” comparable to NATO’s Article Four, committing both nations to defend each other’s sovereignty. Defence Minister Richard Marles called it “a really big strategic step,” while analysts said the deal cements Canberra as PNG’s security partner of choice amid rising regional competition.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109557 (pb)

>>122210

Australia and Papua New Guinea to 'totally integrate' military in defence treaty, minister says

Marian Faa - 13 September 2025

1/2

Australia and Papua New Guinea's military forces will become "totally integrated" as part of a landmark defence treaty between the two nations, the ABC can reveal.

The major security agreement is expected to be signed this week as Papua New Guinea marks 50 years of independence.

Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese, Defence Minister Richard Marles and Minister for the Pacific Pat Conroy are due to arrive in Papua New Guinea on Monday ahead of the celebrations.

PNG's Defence Minister Billy Joseph said the deal was a "mutual defence treaty" that would see the countries work together to defend each other's territories.

"We're not talking about interoperability, we're talking about totally integrated forces," he told the ABC.

"Australian Defence Force (ADF) and PNG Defence Force (PNGDF) both working together closely, using the same equipment … fighting together, defending our sovereignties as an integrated force."

Dr Joseph said the pact would contain an article similar to Article Four of NATO's founding treaty, which says member countries must consult when any of them feels their territorial integrity, political independence or security is threatened.

The deal will allow the ADF to recruit Papua New Guinea citizens and the PNGDF to recruit Australian citizens, a briefing document seen by the ABC said.

It is also understood that the treaty will provide a pathway for Papua New Guineans to gain Australian citizenship by serving in the ADF.

Speaking with the ABC's Insiders program on Sunday, Defence Minister Richard Marles said there was no question they would be paid the same as Australian recruits.

"This is something we would be doing hand in glove with PNG as we walk down this path," he said.

"Numbers will clearly be managed and we need to be careful about how we do that if we're walking down this path.

"I'm very pleased to see the excitement that [PNG Defence Minister] Billy [Joseph] is bringing to this and it does, to be honest, reflect the way in which we've been going about this agreement since the moment we first met to do this refresh."

The neighbouring nations have, since June, been conducting formal negotiations over the defence treaty, which could have major implications for Australia's national security capabilities.

A submission is expected to be presented to PNG's cabinet for approval on Monday before it can be signed by both countries' prime ministers.

Dr Joseph said he expected unanimous support for the agreement within Papua New Guinea's parliament, which will need to ratify the agreement for it to take effect.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122239

File: a1ca81969f95ce5⋯.jpg (148.92 KB,1280x720,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: b2262ea8b43782a⋯.jpg (253.9 KB,1600x900,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 47512bcae60f001⋯.jpg (294.17 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23598223 (141021ZSEP25) Notable: Jacinta Allan set to meet China’s commerce and education minister with trade-focused mission - Victorian Premier Jacinta Allan will launch a new China strategy in Beijing, seeking to emphasise trade and education while distancing herself from former premier Dan Andrews’s appearance at the 2025 China Victory Day military parade. Allan is scheduled to meet China’s commerce and education ministers on Monday before a five-day tour of Beijing, Shanghai, Nanjing and Chengdu focused on services exports, tourism, medtech and clean energy. Analysts cautioned that Beijing often ties political demands to economic offers, but said Allan’s agenda is “overwhelmingly economic.” The trip includes Labor MPs from electorates with large Chinese-Australian communities.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122156

>>122162

>>122223

Jacinta Allan set to meet China’s commerce and education minister with trade-focused mission

ANTHONY GALLOWAY - 14 September 2025

1/2

Victorian Premier Jacinta Allan will on Monday unveil a fresh China strategy in Beijing, seeking to draw a clear distinction with her predecessor Dan Andrews’s appearance at a military parade in Tiananmen Square.

In her first official trip to China, Ms Allan is expected to meet with China’s education and commerce ministers in Beijing and set out a five-day agenda focused on education, tourism, medtech and clean energy.

The meetings with the senior central government figures are subject to change but multiple sources confirmed they were scheduled on Monday after she announces Victoria’s new “China strategy”.

Ms Allan said the strategy would position Victoria as the “first port of call for Chinese business to innovate and invest – and the destination of choice for Chinese people to visit and study”.

“That delivers jobs and stability in an increasingly uncertain world, and it will benefit everyone in our state – including our Chinese community, who honour us as our navigators in Chinese business and life,” she said.

Her entourage want the trip firmly focused on boosting trade and education links and to avoid entangling Victoria into Beijing’s new geopolitical pitches such as the Global Security Initiative, after Canberra tore up the state’s Belt and Road agreement in 2021.

Following the Beijing launch, Ms Allan will travel to Shanghai, Nanjing and Chengdu for a series of trade and education engagements in what will be a packed itinerary where she is expected to meet several senior provincial officials and party secretaries.

Ms Allan on Friday declined to be drawn on Mr Andrews’s visit and whether her predecessor was still in China, saying only: “Daniel is a private citizen, and as a private citizen; I’m not aware of the travel plans of every private citizen here.”

Bethany Allen, ASPI’s head of China analysis, said Victorian officials need to be prepared for “political demands wrapped in economic promises that are likely too good to be true”.

“There is a lot of value in strengthening local-to-local relationships, both cultural and economic, but the CCP has for decades displayed a tendency to abuse the goodwill and even naivete of local officials in other countries, sometimes demanding local officials give up unofficial ties with Taiwan or even that [they] lobby their national governments to adopt softer policies on China,” she said.

“The CCP has a name for this strategy: ‘Using the local to surround the centre’.”

James Laurenceson, director of the Australia-China Relations Institute at the University of Technology Sydney, said Ms Allan’s meetings with the commerce and education ministers would be considered “high-level” and “quite a coup”.

“Victoria is unusual in that the value of its services exports are on par with its goods exports. And education is by far the leading services export, with China being the largest market,” he said.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122240

File: 68f1c4b3d3f25de⋯.jpg (328.67 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: d6461f9107798b6⋯.jpg (355.69 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23603388 (150904ZSEP25) Notable: Richard Marles claims defence spending is 2.8pc of GDP under NATO standards as Anthony Albanese pitches Donald Trump meeting - Defence Minister Richard Marles has argued Australia’s defence spending is 2.8 per cent of GDP when measured under NATO standards, which include pensions, intelligence and infrastructure, as the government faces U.S. pressure to lift funding to 3.5 per cent. The claim came as Prime Minister Anthony Albanese announced a $12 billion expansion of Perth’s Henderson shipyards and prepared for a potential first meeting with President Donald Trump in New York. The Opposition and analysts dismissed the government figures as “semantics” and “magical thinking,” saying the increase will not materially change GDP share.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122177

>>122210

>>122236

Richard Marles claims defence spending is 2.8pc of GDP under NATO standards as Anthony Albanese pitches Donald Trump meeting

PAUL GARVEY and SARAH ISON - 14 September 2025

1/2

The Albanese government says it is getting closer to meeting ­Donald Trump’s defence funding demands, arguing the nation’s military-related expenditure is 2.8 per cent of GDP under NATO standards, as Anthony Albanese pitches for a meeting with the US President as early as next week.

Defence Minister Richard Marles put forward the new figure to measure Australia’s defence spending, taking in defence pensions, intelligence spending and infrastructure, as the US piles pressure on Australia to lift its defence budget from 2 per cent of GDP to 3.5 per cent.

Expenditure on “relevant ­activities” of the national intelligence community that directly support defence is also included, as is naval shipbuilding infrastructure.

“There are different measures around the world of percentages of GDP. I mean, if you look at the way in which NATO accounts for its own spending in terms of ­percentage of GDP based on that metric, our spending on GDP today in terms of defence is around 2.8 per cent,” Mr Marles said, as he unveiled a pledge to spend $12bn expanding naval shipyards at Henderson, south of Perth.

That announcement comes just a week before Mr Albanese heads to New York for the United Nations General Assembly, where he may get the opportunity to meet Donald Trump face to face for the first time.

But opposition defence spokesman Angus Taylor said Mr Marles’s “embrace of accounting semantics is just a concession the current funding is insufficient”.

“The truth is, Labor refuses to lift defence spending to 3 per cent of GDP, and that is avoiding reality in the most dangerous strategic environment since the Second World War,” he said.

Mr Taylor said the government’s own Defence Strategic Review showed its current level of spending was insufficient to deliver AUKUS.

“Labor has only been pushed into this (Henderson) essential investment because the Prime Minister is desperate to impress President Trump when he visits New York later this month,” he said.

“The government should be very careful about misleading our allies about what it counts as an increase in defence investment, when in real terms it’s not.”

The Prime Minister on Sunday said the commitment to overhaul the Henderson shipyards was done only with the interests of Australia in mind but acknowledged that both the US and UK would be pleased by the news.

The Henderson shipyards will eventually be the hub for the sustainment and maintenance of Australia’s future nuclear-powered submarines, but will also be where vessels such as army’s landing craft and navy’s Mogami-class frigates will be built.

Mr Albanese said that while Australia had always “pulled its weight” and contributed to its alliances, the Henderson funding and the broader increase in Australian defence spending was driven by the needs of the nation.

“This is an Australian decision for Australia’s national interest,” he said.

“It’s not about comparing or what other countries want. We’re investing in our capability, that’s what we’re doing. We don’t respond to the needs of others, we respond to our own needs.”

Mr Marles said the defence spending was driven by Australia’s priorities and its assessment of the strategic landscape.

“I’ve got no doubt this decision will be welcomed in the United States, as it will be welcomed in the United Kingdom, because it is another step forward down the AUKUS path,” Mr Marles said.

“But fundamentally, what we are doing here is an Australian announcement, and it is based on meeting the timing needs that we have to maintain momentum around this.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122241

File: 93192b61f246d1e⋯.jpg (386.75 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 7b66e4765df0a2a⋯.jpg (588.86 KB,2047x1152,2047:1152,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23603399 (150913ZSEP25) Notable: Australia to modernise PNG military under ‘hugely significant’ treaty - Australia will spend billions modernising Papua New Guinea’s military under a landmark treaty to be signed during PNG’s 50th independence anniversary. Defence Minister Richard Marles called the pact “hugely significant,” saying it would strengthen defence of Australia’s northern approaches and integrate the nations’ forces. The treaty will replace a 1977 agreement, include provisions for mutual defence consultations, and allow thousands of Papua New Guineans to serve in the ADF with a pathway to citizenship. Analysts said it cements Australia as PNG’s security partner of choice amid Chinese influence, but warned of potential regional entanglements and budget pressures.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122210

>>122238

Australia to modernise PNG military under ‘hugely significant’ treaty

BEN PACKHAM - 14 September 2025

1/2

Australia will spend billions of dollars on new weapons and equipment for Papua New Guinea’s military under a landmark new treaty that will introduce new mutual defence arrangements and integrate the nations’ forces as never before.

Defence Minister Richard Marles said the treaty, to be signed by Anthony Albanese and his PNG counterpart James Marape this week, was “hugely significant” and suggested it would help Australia to better defend its northern approaches.

The Prime Minister will fly into Port Moresby on Monday to join the country’s 50th anniversary of independence celebrations, vowing to expand the ­nations’ “special relationship” as “partners and equals”.

A PNG government briefing note obtained by The Australian said the defence treaty would build and modernise the PNG Defence Force’s “capability and operational proficiency”, with Mr Marles declaring this would be done in a “much bigger way” than in the past.

The briefing note said the agreement would enable “mutual defence”, a “combined contribution to regional security” and allow the PNGDF to “speak for the ADF” when dealing with smaller Pacific states.

It is yet to be revealed whether Australia will be legally obligated to defend PNG if it is attacked or whether the Australian Defence Force will be allowed to operate freely from the country to attack enemy forces sailing towards Australia.

PNG Defence Minister Billy Joseph told the ABC the nations’ militaries would be “totally integrated” under the treaty, which would include a provision similar to NATO’s Article IV that requires member countries to consult on emerging security threats.

The provision is less onerous than NATO’s Article V that says an armed attack on one member is considered to be an attack on all, and members will act in concert to meet the threat.

Mr Marles declined to comment on the extent of the mutual obligations, saying he did not want to pre-empt the announcement, which is expected on Wednesday.

He said the government did not intend to garrison troops in PNG but pointed to the country’s geostrategic significance to Australia.

“PNG is obviously on our northern flank. It really matters that we have the very best relationship that we can have with PNG in a security sense,” he told the ABC’s Insiders program.

As revealed by The Australian, the defence treaty will open the way for thousands of Papua New Guineans to serve in the ADF, who will gain Australian citizenship and earn the same rates of pay as their Australian counterparts.

The option is set to be promoted to the country’s young people and university students, but Mr Marles conceded the numbers of recruits would have to be carefully managed to prevent an exodus from the PNGDF.

“This is something we would be doing hand in glove with PNG as we walk down this path,” he said.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122242

File: a774cf77fc2932e⋯.jpg (120.62 KB,1280x720,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 118a01a86732eb9⋯.jpg (85.79 KB,1280x720,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: c896913f3419478⋯.jpg (163.77 KB,1280x720,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 03b00cdc19c3454⋯.jpg (195.65 KB,1280x720,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23603406 (150918ZSEP25) Notable: Defence pact elevates PNG to treaty level of US and NZ - Prime Minister Anthony Albanese says a new defence treaty with Papua New Guinea elevates the relationship to the level of Australia’s pacts with the United States and New Zealand. The agreement, to be signed during PNG’s 50th independence celebrations, will integrate the nations’ forces, enable mutual defence support, and allow Papua New Guineans to serve in the ADF on equal pay with a pathway to citizenship. PNG Defence Minister Billy Joseph described it as a “mutual defence treaty” with “totally integrated forces.” Analysts said the deal signals a strategic win for Australia amid regional competition with China.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122210

>>122238

>>122241

Defence pact elevates PNG to treaty level of US and NZ

'Rachael Ward and Lloyd Jones - September 15 2025

A new Australian defence pact elevates Papua New Guinea to the treaty level of the United States and New Zealand, Anthony Albanese says.

The prime minister is visiting Port Moresby this week to sign the pact with counterpart James Marape and attend PNG's celebrations for its 50th anniversary of independence.

The landmark agreement will "integrate" forces either side of the Torres Strait and could trigger mutual support in cases of conflict.

It will also enable PNG nationals to serve in Australia's defence force with the same pay as other members and start a pathway to citizenship.

"It's an upgrade in our security relationship to a treaty level, to the sort of level that we have with the United States and our important allies," the prime minister told the ABC on Monday.

Details are yet to be revealed, including whether both nations would be compelled to consult each other if they faced a security threat, similar to NATO's Article Four clause.

"It provides for mutual defence, which means that we will provide support for each other, provide for an integration of our interoperability of our assets and our respective defence forces," Mr Albanese said.

More detail would be provided once the agreement was signed on Wednesday, he said, following celebrations of the Pacific nation's golden jubilee.

Mr Albanese praised Mr Marape for showing great leadership and moving forward with Australia, saying the relationship upgrade took place at his suggestion.

Mr Albanese emphasised the two nations were expanding their partnership as equals and had the same vision for a stable and prosperous Pacific.

The treaty speaks to a shared ambition between the two nations, said Defence Minister Richard Marles, who will accompany the prime minister in Port Moresby along with Pacific Minister Pat Conroy.

PNG Defence Minister Billy Joseph said the deal was a "mutual defence treaty" that would have the nations working together to defend each other's territories.

"We're not talking about interoperability, we're talking about totally integrated forces," he told the ABC.

"Australian Defence Force and PNG Defence Force both working together closely, using the same equipment … fighting together, defending our sovereignties as an integrated force."

It is PNG's first defence agreement with another nation and deeply significant for the nation, Lowy Institute research fellow Oliver Nobetau said.

The world was waiting to learn if it included an exclusivity clause, which meant PNG could not pursue similar deals with other countries, such as China, he said.

"We can define that as a sort of the holy grail of security partnerships in the Pacific and if you can get that, it can signal a return to greater regional stability," Mr Nobetau told AAP.

Australia is competing with China and other nations for influence in the region after having difficulties over security agreements with the Solomons and Vanuatu.

PNG is one of three nations in the Pacific with a military, alongside Fiji and Tonga.

It viewed itself as a "big brother" in the Pacific and was seeking a more dominant role as it marked 50 years since gaining independence from Australia, Mr Nobetau said.

"We may see PNG play a greater role in influencing other countries as well," he said.

Henry Ivarature, deputy director at the Pacific Security College at the Australian National University, said the treaty was more about Australia getting into trouble with neighbours and calling on PNG for support.

"I don't think it's the other way round where PNG gets into strife and Australia will come to its aid."

But Australian politicians shouldn't be anxious about PNG's relationship with Australia, Dr Ivarature told AAP.

https://www.canberratimes.com.au/story/9065878/defence-pact-elevates-png-to-treaty-level-of-us-and-nz/

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122243

File: 5eba6f3a1e0e185⋯.jpg (110.06 KB,1280x720,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: fa10685e01c9305⋯.jpg (82.49 KB,1279x720,1279:720,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23603416 (150923ZSEP25) Notable: ‘Sovereignty threat’ to Australia-PNG defence treaty, critics warn - A landmark defence treaty between Australia and Papua New Guinea is facing criticism from retired PNG military chief Jerry Singirok and opposition leader Douglas Tomuriesa, who warn it could undermine sovereignty and face constitutional challenge. Singirok said the pact risks dragging PNG into a future U.S.-China conflict, arguing “we are a sovereign nation since 1975.” Tomuriesa raised concerns about “constitutional authority, legal protections” and foreign recruitment of PNG citizens into the ADF. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese insisted the treaty “respects the sovereignty of PNG” and provides for mutual defence.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122210

>>122238

>>122241

>>122242

‘Sovereignty threat’ to Australia-PNG defence treaty, critics warn

BEN PACKHAM - 15 September 2025

1/2

A new Australia-Papua New Guinea defence treaty is facing a backlash from PNG’s most ­respected former military chief and the country’s opposition, who warn it will threaten the country’s sovereignty and could face a constitutional challenge.

Retired major general Jerry Singirok said the agreement placed the country’s “friend to all, enemy to none” foreign policy at risk and could see PNG drawn into a future war with China.

PNG opposition leader Douglas Tomuriesa said he welcomed closer co-operation between his country’s and Australia’s militaries but had “serious questions about sovereignty, constitutionality, indemnities, law and order, and how the agreement will be governed in practice”.

Anthony Albanese, who is in PNG to celebrate the country’s 50th anniversary of independence from Australia on Tuesday, will sign the treaty with his PNG counterpart James Marape the following day.

Responding to criticisms of the agreement after they were ­revealed by The Australian, the Prime Minister told the ABC: “This respects the sovereignty of PNG. I can assure you of that.”

While the extent of each ­country’s obligations in the event of a conflict is yet to be ­revealed, Mr Albanese said the agreement “provides for mutual defence, which means that we will provide support for each other”.

“They’ve chosen Australia. This is them looking forward,” Mr Albanese told Sky News.

General Singirok – who kicked foreign mercenaries out of PNG ­during the Bougainville crisis sparking the downfall of then-prime minister Julius Chan – said the new treaty had been negotiated “in secret, without public debate”, and needed to be properly scrutinised by the country’s parliament.

“The issue is that we are no longer a colony or territory of Australia. We are a sovereign nation since 1975,” General Singirok said in Port Moresby.

“Any treaty that forces another state to take into their ‘order of battle’ (the forces of) another state is violating the constitution and the sovereignty of an independent state.

“You just can’t go in and take over another country’s military and put an Australian flag on it.”

General Singirok said that given Australia was allied to the US, which could find itself in a war with China over Taiwan, he was concerned the agreement could place PNG in the firing line in a future conflict. “They’re not necessarily our enemy,” he said. “The perceived threat that Australia sees is not necessarily the same as ours, because we are a sovereign country.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122244

File: a5ff9d755e7ecae⋯.jpg (356.53 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 985d302f9b5304a⋯.jpg (2.78 MB,3929x2621,3929:2621,Clipboard.jpg)

File: a4c2c1599e96d77⋯.jpg (2.23 MB,3990x2662,1995:1331,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23603437 (150941ZSEP25) Notable: ‘We won’t turn our backs on China’: Jacinta Allan doubles down backing communist superpower - Victorian Premier Jacinta Allan has launched her new China strategy in Beijing, declaring “we have not turned our backs to China - we have turned to face it.” She said the plan would make Victoria “the first port of call for Chinese business to innovate and invest” and the “destination of choice” for Chinese visitors and students. The strategy highlights education, clean energy, tourism and public transport, and revives the Hamer Scholarship Program for tertiary study in China, reserving places for Victorian regional students. Allan stressed China is Victoria’s top trading partner and “an old friend with deep historic ties.”

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122156

>>122162

>>122223

>>122239

‘We won’t turn our backs on China’: Jacinta Allan doubles down backing communist superpower

ANTHONY GALLOWAY - 15 September 2025

1/2

Jacinta Allan has declared Victoria has not turned its back on China, vowing to double down on the country to secure more international students and investment into the state’s public transport and clean energy.

In a speech to be delivered in Beijing on Monday night launching the state’s new China strategy, the Victorian Premier will declare her aim for Victoria to become the first port of call for Chinese business to innovate and invest and the destination of choice for Chinese people to visit and study.

Ms Allan will say her new plan differs in three ways to that of the 2016 strategy released under her predecessor Daniel Andrews: it elevates regional Victoria, empowers the local Chinese community and prioritises education.

“In Victoria, we have not turned our backs to China – we have turned to face it,” she will say, according to a draft of the speech, which steers clear of geopolitical flashpoints between Canberra and Beijing.

“We trade our shared strengths. We invest in shared projects. In an uncertain global economy, that means jobs, stability and confidence – and a better future for our families.”

Ms Allan’s five-day trip has been overshadowed by the actions of Mr Andrews after he appeared at a military parade in Tiananmen Square less than two weeks ago.

The speech will be delivered in front of Chinese People’s Association for Friendship vice president Lu Xiangdong, deputy director general of the Chinese Service Centre for Scholarly Exchange Xi Jianhui, Australia’s ambassador to China Scott Dewar and Victoria’s new commissioner for Greater China Leigh Howard, as well as her entourage of five Labor MPs.

Parliamentary secretary and Box Hill MP Paul Hamer has joined the Premier on the mission to China.

Four Labor backbenchers – Clarinda MP Meng Heang Tak, Point Cook MP Mat Hilakari, Ashwood MP Matt Fregon and Glen Waverley MP John Mullahy – have also joined the Premier. The Labor MPs represent electorates with large numbers of Chinese voters.

Ms Allan will say that her plan focuses on six sectors where Victoria stands apart: education, agribusiness, health and life sciences, creative industries and sport, tourism, investment in clean energy and public transport.

“The story of Victoria over the last ten years can be told in two ways: investment in public transport and investment in clean energy,” she said. “I have come to China to seal the deal on both.”

She said China was “the world’s clean energy superpower”.

“In Victoria today, 427,000 people have Chinese ancestry and more than 300,000 speak a Chinese language at home,” she will say.

“China, today, is Victoria’s number one source of visitors, and our number one trading partner, producing more value than Victoria’s next three export partners combined.”

Earlier on Monday, Ms Allan said she won’t be deterred from asking Prime Minister Anthony Albanese to raise the international student cap after announcing a suite of new higher education initiatives in Beijing.

The Albanese government last year imposed a cap of 270,000 international student enrolments across Australian higher education and vocational providers for the 2025 calendar year.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122245

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23603441 (150948ZSEP25) Notable: Video: Epstein accuser Virginia Giuffre’s private battle revealed in diary entries - To the rest of the world Virginia Guiffre may have symbolised strength, taking on and bringing down the rich and powerful - the likes of Jeffery Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell and most famously Prince Andrew. But privately, she was fighting a battle of her own. If you or someone you know needs support, help is available 24/7. - Lifeline: Call 13 11 14, text 0477 13 11 14 or visit lifeline.org.au - Beyond Blue: Call 1300 22 4636 or visit beyondblue.org.au - DV Connect: Call 1800 RESPECT or visit 1800respect.org.au - 60 Minutes Australia

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109289 (pb)

>>109474 (pb)

>>109582 (pb)

>>122204

Epstein accuser Virginia Giuffre’s private battle revealed in diary entries

60 Minutes Australia

Sep 14, 2025

To the rest of the world Virginia Guiffre may have symbolised strength, taking on and bringing down the rich and powerful - the likes of Jeffery Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell and most famously Prince Andrew. But privately, she was fighting a battle of her own.

If you or someone you know needs support, help is available 24/7.

Lifeline: Call 13 11 14, text 0477 13 11 14 or visit lifeline.org.au

Beyond Blue: Call 1300 22 4636 or visit beyondblue.org.au

DV Connect: Call 1800 RESPECT or visit 1800respect.org.au

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N61aNQYAnBY

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122246

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23608091 (160921ZSEP25) Notable: Video: ‘China is relentless’: US diplomat warns Beijing could be influencing PNG treaty delay - Australia and Papua New Guinea are scrambling to finalise a landmark “Pukpuk Treaty” after PNG’s cabinet failed to reach a quorum during independence celebrations, delaying approval before Prime Minister Anthony Albanese’s departure. The pact would grant the ADF access to PNG facilities, allow cross-enlistment, and include a mutual defence clause similar to ANZUS. Albanese insisted the deal had “overwhelming support,” while analysts warned of political fallout if it slips. Former US official Kurt Campbell suggested China may be working to obstruct the treaty, saying “China is relentless” in contesting Pacific security initiatives.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122199

>>122238

>>122241

>>122242

‘China is relentless’: US diplomat warns Beijing could be influencing PNG treaty delay

Matthew Knott - September 16, 2025

1/2

Australia and Papua New Guinea are scrambling to avoid a diplomatic embarrassment by locking in a historic defence treaty before Prime Minister Anthony Albanese leaves the Pacific nation, after PNG’s cabinet was unable to sign off on the pact.

Albanese and other senior ministers were projecting confidence that the treaty would be signed, but difficulties in organising a quorum of PNG cabinet ministers during the nation’s 50th anniversary of independence celebrations may delay the inking of the pact until after Albanese ends his three-day visit to Port Moresby on Wednesday.

A failure to sign the pact during the visit would represent another setback for Albanese after Vanuatu abruptly shelved plans to sign a security deal with Australia during his visit to the Melanesian nation last week.

As this masthead revealed last week, the treaty includes a clause committing the two nations to “act to meet the common danger” in the event of an attack on either country, putting the relationship on par with Australia’s military alliances with the United States and New Zealand.

The pact, to be known as the “Pukpuk Treaty” after the Pidgin word for “crocodile”, would also grant the Australian Defence Force unimpeded access to designated facilities in PNG and allow Papua New Guineans and Australians to serve in each other’s militaries.

“It was due to go to the PNG cabinet yesterday,” Albanese told ABC TV on Tuesday. “There’s celebrations going on everywhere, so they weren’t able to have a quorum ... But they’re going through that process and it has overwhelming support and it’ll be a very good thing.”

Albanese told reporters that “we will be able to advance the treaty tomorrow”.

“Prime Minister [James] Marape is dealing with his cabinet, trying to deal with that remotely, but we’ll work those issues through, and it’s understandable and we respect the sovereignty, of course, of PNG,” he said.

Senior government sources said they were confident the treaty would be signed, if not during Albanese’s PNG visit, then soon after.

Albanese said the idea that Australia would just “sit back and watch” if PNG was under attack “ignores the history … between our two great nations”.

Pacific Minister Pat Conroy, who is also in PNG, told ABC radio he was confident the treaty would be signed.

“This is an important affair and we’ll get to it tomorrow,” he said.

Kurt Campbell, who served as former president Joe Biden’s top Indo-Pacific adviser, said it was not surprising there were last-minute challenges with the treaty, suggesting Chinese influence could be involved.

“I think it suggests that this is a region at strategic play, and that China is relentless, and they use all venues of engagement to try to block and block initiatives like the ones that Australia has initiated,” he told the National Press Club on Tuesday.

“The politics of the Pacific are increasingly contested, and the great game is afoot...I do not believe that China’s pattern of engagement or practices among the Pacific Islands in any way will halt or diminish.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122247

File: d73bb8f93cd66eb⋯.jpg (265.13 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23608098 (160926ZSEP25) Notable: COMMENTARY: PNG treaty sign-off no easy task but Anthony Albanese can’t fail again … can he? - “[T]he Pukpuk Treaty would cement PNG as an Australian ally as much as the US or New Zealand, with all the responsibilities that entails. On Tuesday morning,…Prime Minister James Marape’s cabinet had failed to endorse the agreement the previous day, as planned, after it was unable to reach a quorum. Albanese laughed off the cabinet snafu, saying PNG’s ministers were understandably in their electorates celebrating the independence day holiday. It’s true that things don’t always run smoothly in PNG, which is known for good reason as the “land of the unexpected”...[Albanese] tried to maintain an optimistic disposition as things went awry, but was unable to declare with any certainty that the treaty would be signed as planned on Wednesday…Perhaps some of [Marape’s] MPs and ministers see an irony in the nation signing a far-reaching security agreement with its former colonial master on the day after it marks 50 years as an independent state?” – Ben Packham, The Australian

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122199

>>122238

>>122242

>>122246

COMMENTARY: PNG treaty sign-off no easy task but Anthony Albanese can’t fail again … can he?

BEN PACKHAM - 16 September 2025

The ear-splitting roar of two ­Australian F-35 fighter jets drowned out Papua New Guinea’s national anthem during a dawn flag-­raising ceremony in Port ­Moresby on Tuesday marking the country’s 50th anniversary of ­independence.

The spectacle delighted the crowd, but it was also a not-so-subtle reminder that while PNG may be master of its own destiny, Australia is the country’s major security partner.

Anthony Albanese travelled to PNG this week with high hopes of elevating that partnership by signing a landmark defence treaty with the nation’s closest neighbour. The agreement is ambitious – perhaps too ambitious if events of the past 48 hours are anything to go by. A leaked copy of the agreement reveals the Pukpuk Treaty would cement PNG as an Australian ally as much as the US or New Zealand, with all the ­responsibilities that entails.

Its key articles are modelled on the ANZUS Treaty, including a commitment to “act to meet the common danger” in the event of an armed attack on either country. On Monday afternoon, The Australian reported serious sovereignty concerns had been raised over the agreement by PNG’s ­opposition and the country’s ­respected former defence chief, Jerry Singirok.

Then, on Tuesday morning, we revealed Prime Minister James Marape’s cabinet had failed to ­endorse the agreement the previous day, as planned, after it was unable to reach a quorum.

It is perhaps now dawning on some senior PNG figures that if Australia finds itself in a war with China thanks to its US alliance, the proposed new treaty would draw PNG into the conflict.

In reality, this would happen anyway by dint of basic geography. But PNG has long clung to the idea it is a “friend to all, enemy to none”.

Albanese laughed off the cabinet snafu, saying PNG’s ministers were understandably in their electorates celebrating the independence day holiday. It’s true that things don’t always run smoothly in PNG, which is known for good reason as the “land of the unexpected”.

But even here, the idea that sufficient cabinet members wouldn’t turn up to a scheduled meeting on such an important topic stretches credulity. And given the proximity to independence day, why did Marape wait so long to secure cabinet sign-off?

Why also did Albanese raise hopes the agreement would be signed this week when PNG was, as he put it, “still going through the processes here”?

The PM tried to maintain an optimistic disposition as things went awry, but was unable to declare with any certainty that the treaty would be signed as planned on Wednesday. The best he could do was say he and Marape would “advance” the agreement. In the back of his mind, no doubt, was his failed attempt last week to get a long-negotiated ­bilateral security agreement across the line with Vanuatu. Botching two in such short succession would start to look negligent.

In the case of Vanuatu, China is believed to have wielded its influence with senior members of the country’s government to scuttle the deal. It’s unclear whether Beijing has played a similar role in the uncertainty now facing the PNG treaty, but it has every reason to do so and many links to the country’s senior ministers.

The proposed agreement remains a golden opportunity for Australia to bolster its defences and would deliver huge benefits for PNG in new equipment and training, and the opportunity for its citizens to serve in the Australian Defence Force.

Australia’s Minister for the ­Pacific, Pat Conroy maintained the deal would ultimately get done. “This is just a question of logistics getting sufficient PNG ministers in a room to agree,” he said. But it’s hardly a sure thing.

Albanese and Marape are as close as an Australian and a Papua New Guinean leader have been since Gough Whitlam and Michael Somare.

But while Marape has a handy majority in the parliament, his ­coalition government is made up of at least five major parties, and an array of smaller ones. Securing a consensus on such a significant agreement in the PNG context is no easy task.

Perhaps some of his MPs and ministers see an irony in PNG signing up to a fear-reaching ­security agreement with its former colonial master on the day after its marks 50 years as an independent state?

If the Albanese government has overreached again, Australia will pay the price.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/commentary/png-treaty-signoff-no-easy-task-but-anthony-albanese-cant-fail-again-can-he/news-story/06d49a67dd65bcfe0a57ab0781c49a95

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122248

File: 4e30658ac3b0162⋯.jpg (245.47 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23608107 (160934ZSEP25) Notable: China playing the ‘great game’ against Australia in the Pacific, Kurt Campbell says – Former US deputy secretary of state Kurt Campbell warned in Canberra that “the great game is afoot” in the Pacific, with Beijing “relentless” in trying to block Australia’s initiatives. He said delays in finalising a PNG defence treaty may reflect Chinese interference, noting such deals are “contested behind the scenes”. Praising Australia for stepping up as US influence fell under Donald Trump, Campbell urged Anthony Albanese to press Trump to re-engage in the Pacific, and said Albanese could also help repair Trump’s rift with India. Campbell backed AUKUS, called for higher Australian defence spending, but stressed “Australia is a sovereign, democratic nation” and should not have terms dictated by Washington.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122199

>>122238

>>122242

>>122246

China playing the ‘the great game’ against Australia in the Pacific, Kurt Campbell says

CAMERON STEWART - 16 September 2025

1/2

Former US deputy secretary of state Kurt Campbell has warned that China will seek to sabotage all Australian initiatives in the ­Pacific, including its stalled security deal with Papua New Guinea, because “the great game is afoot” between the two countries and Beijing is “relentless”.

In an ominous warning, Dr Campbell, the key driver of US policy in the Indo-Pacific in Joe Biden’s administration, said it was critical that Australia stepped up in the Pacific region now because US influence had fallen away under Donald Trump.

“The politics of the Pacific are increasingly contested, and the great game is afoot,” Dr Campbell told the National Press Club in Canberra on Tuesday.

“I will say I’ve been very impressed at how Australia has stepped into the gap (because) you’ve seen some countries, ­including the United States, fall back with respect to our aid and our assistance programs.’

When asked about the delay from the PNG government in signing a historic security deal with Australia, Dr Campbell hinted at possible Chinese interference.

“I think it suggests that this is a region at strategic play, and that China is relentless, and they use all venues of engagement to try to block and block initiatives like the ones that Australia has initiated,” he said. “What Australia has done in a comprehensive fashion in PNG, beginning with sport, looking at training, and then also focusing on security, I think is ingenious and important.”

Dr Campbell said it was not surprising that there were “last-minute challenges” in finalising Australia’s security deal with PNG as well as the recent postponement of the proposed security deal with Vanuatu, because all of these deals were contested ­behind the scenes.

“I do not believe that China’s pattern of engagement or practices among the Pacific Islands, in any way will halt or diminish,” he said.

He added that it was up to ­Australia, New Zealand and the US to keep fighting to win hearts of minds in the region.

“We (must) address the central issues that basically define life in the Pacific: dealing with climate change, resilience, societal resilience, illegal fishing, jobs, opportunities, communications with undersea cables,” he said.

Dr Campbell called on ­Anthony Albanese to help ­persuade the Trump administration to re-engage in the Pacific following severe cuts to US aid and diplomatic presence in the region.

“I fully believe that Prime Minister Albanese will make the appeal to President Trump to re-engage, to continue the strong partnership with Australia in the Pacific,” he said.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122249

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23608121 (160949ZSEP25) Notable: Big tech’s $49.5m deadline: The race to kick under-16s off social media – Social media giants including Meta, Snapchat, TikTok, X and YouTube must remove under-16s from their platforms by December 10 or face fines of up to $49.5 million. The laws, described as among the world’s toughest, require “reasonable steps” such as detecting and deactivating underage accounts, blocking re-registration and offering review mechanisms, but stop short of mandating blanket ID checks. Communications Minister Anika Wells said platforms now “know what their responsibilities are,” while eSafety Commissioner Julie Inman Grant stressed a “layered” and “minimally invasive” approach. Anthony Albanese will promote the laws at the UN, urging other nations to follow Australia’s lead.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109444 (pb)

>>>/qresearch/23402364 (pb)

>>109500 (pb)

Big tech’s $49.5m deadline: The race to kick under-16s off social media

JARED LYNCH - 15 September 2025

1/2

Facebook owner Meta, Snapchat, Elon Musk’s X and other tech ­titans must detect and shut down children’s accounts or risk fines of $49.5m after the government imposed a deadline for its world-first underage social media ban.

Communications Minister Anika Wells and eSafety Commissioner Julie Inman Grant revealed late on Monday evening what “reasonable steps” social media companies must take to comply with the new laws.

From December 10, it will be illegal in Australia for children under the age of 16 to open and operate a social media account. This includes Google-owned YouTube, which was previously granted an exemption before the government did an about-face.

While social media platforms must detect and remove underage users, the government said they did not need to verify the ages of all account holders, saying such a move “may be considered unreasonable”.

The guidance moves beyond simple self-declaration of age, which is deemed insufficient. Platforms will now be expected to employ a “layered approach” to age assurance, leveraging various technologies and methods to increase confidence in age estimates. This follows the government’s Age Assurance Technology Trial, which demonstrated the availability of such tools.

Ms Wells warned social media behemoths that there was no excuse not to comply with the laws – among the most stringent crackdowns on social media companies globally – by December 10.

“The Albanese government is backing families through this world-leading law and eSafety’s guidance means social media platforms know what their responsibilities are,” Ms Wells said.

Anthony Albanese will outline how the ban will work at the UN General Assembly in New York this month as he urges other countries to adopt similar laws to protect children, warning that social media has a corrosive impact on youth globally.

He said he had written to James Larsen, Australia’s permanent representative to the UN, with the intention of holding an event with the Let Them Be Kids and 36 Months advocacy groups that agitated for the restrictions.

Under the ban, social media platforms including TikTok, Snapchat, X, Instagram, Facebook and YouTube will be required to take “reasonable steps” to prevent children younger than 16 from creating or holding an ­account.

These reasonable steps include: detecting and deactivating underage accounts, preventing re-registration or circumvention, and providing accessible review mechanisms for users.

The government developed the guidance with Ms Inman Grant, whom Mr Musk has criticised after she demanded to know how X was combating widespread child exploitation material shared on the platform.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122250

File: 13bbb9ac560453e⋯.jpg (739.67 KB,3443x2295,3443:2295,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23608146 (161007ZSEP25) Notable: Victoria’s push for Chinese students puts state on a collision course with Canberra – Premier Jacinta Allan launched Victoria’s first China strategy in a decade, declaring her top priority as “education, education and education.” Speaking in Beijing, she said she would “always say yes to international students,” despite a federal cap of 295,000 places next year. The strategy drops the targets set under Daniel Andrews and instead emphasises cultural connection, diaspora ties and regional Victoria’s role. Allan announced new university and TAFE agreements, plus the revival of $10,000 Hamer Scholarships for regional students to study in China. The plan highlights six key sectors and seeks Chinese investment in public transport and clean energy.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122162

>>122223

>>122239

>>122244

Victoria’s push for Chinese students puts state on a collision course with Canberra

Chip Le Grand - September 15, 2025

1/2

Beijing: Premier Jacinta Allan placed her government on a collision course with Canberra over international student numbers as she declared boosting international education the top priority of her China strategy unveiled in Beijing.

In a speech delivered to Chinese and Victorian business leaders, diplomats and trade officials on Monday night, Allan nominated her three priorities for the five-year strategy as “education, education and education”.

Asked whether the strategy would reach its goals without the federal government lifting the cap on international student numbers, Allan was blunt: “I will always say yes to international students and I am not going to be deterred.”

The China strategy is Victoria’s first for 10 years. It has dumped specific targets listed in the previous document and instead seeks to couch Victoria’s push for more export dollars and investment from its largest trading partner in terms of community connection and cultural exchange.

Where the 2016 strategy, released in Daniel Andrews’ first term as premier, set long-term goals to more than double Victoria’s share of Chinese investment, double the value of the state’s exports to China and increase by $1.2 billion expenditure from Chinese visitors, the 2025 strategy emphasises the benefit of the existing partnership and the role of the Australian Chinese diaspora in shaping its future.

Some of the 2016 targets were cruelled by the pandemic, which severed Victoria’s two largest service exports – education and tourism.

In 2014-15 there were 439,000 Chinese visitors to Victoria. In the 12 months preceding March this year, the number was 411,000.

Chinese student enrolments in Victorian schools, universities and colleges, while slightly up on the 2015 figure, which involved the previous China strategy, remain below their pre-pandemic peak.

The strategy released by Allan forecasts that Chinese visitors will nearly double to 800,000 people by 2029 but contains no projections on future student numbers.

Allan, when asked if she had lobbied Canberra to lift next year’s national cap of 295,000 places – an increase of nearly 10 per cent from this year – said her views were well known to Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and his senior ministers.

The full scale of China’s present involvement in Australian schools and universities was revealed by China Education Association for International Exchange president Dr Liu Limin, who told the Victoria-China Education Dialogue that at the end of the last year, there were 211,500 Chinese studying in Australia.

At the dialogue on Monday, Allan witnessed the signing of agreements between La Trobe University, Federation University and the Sunraysia Institute of TAFE in Mildura and several Beijing institutions to expand their exchange programs. The premier also announced the re-establishment of $10,000 Hamer Scholarships for people from regional Victoria to study in China.

A meeting between the premier and China’s Education Minister, Huai Jinpeng, was scheduled for Monday before the strategy launch.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122251

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23608153 (161014ZSEP25) Notable: Video: Teaching Mandarin in Victorian schools, student exchange top of China strategy – Premier Jacinta Allan secured an agreement with China’s Education Minister Huai Jinpeng to promote Mandarin teaching in Victorian schools and expand student exchanges across all levels. The memorandum establishes a joint working group meeting annually to drive programs, building on ties revived by Daniel Andrews in 2023. Allan, who has made education central to her China strategy, said it would create more opportunities for Victorian teachers and students to engage with Chinese culture. During the trip she also announced Chinese firm Trina Solar will build a $435m battery farm in Victoria’s Kiewa Valley, while a major Suburban Rail Loop contract looms.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122223

>>122239

>>122244

>>122250

Teaching Mandarin in Victorian schools, student exchange top of China strategy

Chip Le Grand - September 16, 2025

Shanghai: Premier Jacinta Allan will return from China with an agreement with Beijing to establish more student exchanges and promote the teaching of Mandarin in Victorian schools after securing a personal meeting with China’s Minister for Education.

The meeting, attended by Australian ambassador to the People’s Republic of China Scott Dewar, is likely to be Allan’s highest-level engagement with the ruling Communist Party during her first trip to China.

Allan and Huai Jinpeng signed a memorandum of understanding to establish a joint working group with Victorian and Chinese officials which will meet once a year to facilitate greater two-way exchanges of primary, secondary and tertiary students.

The agreement builds on preliminary work done by Allan’s predecessor, Daniel Andrews, in 2023 when he met with Huai to re-establish relations after the COVID-19 pandemic disrupted international education and tourism.

Allan, who has nominated “education, education, education” as the priorities for her newly released China Strategy, said the agreement would provide more opportunities for Victorian teachers and students to learn about Chinese culture.

In a statement released by China’s Ministry for Education, Huai said he had “positively evaluated” educational co-operation between China and Victoria.

Referencing improved relations between the two countries since the election of the Albanese government, he said he “hoped both sides will implement the consensus of the leaders of the two countries, explore new models and launch new projects” in student exchanges and joint research.

Details of the agreement emerged as Allan’s travelling party shifted at high speed from Beijing to Shanghai, stopping off at Melbourne’s sister city of Nanjing for a meeting with the governor of Jiangsu province, Xu Kunlin.

Before boarding a Fuxing Hao train capable of exceeding 350km/h, Allan revealed that approval had been granted for Chinese energy company Trina Solar to build a $435 million battery farm in Victoria’s Kiewa Valley.

Allan said the Kiewa Valley Battery Energy Storage System, in the state’s north-east, would have capacity to store enough renewable energy to supply 172,000 homes. While Allan met representatives of Trina Solar in Beijing, the deal was inked before she left Melbourne.

“When I released Victoria’s China strategy yesterday, I made it clear that one of our key priority areas was to partner with China businesses to invest more in renewable energy, in clean energy, in Victoria,” she said “We’re doing this as part of our strategy to bring more jobs for working people and families into Victoria.”

The premier was less expansive about the details of a transport announcement scheduled for later this week and whether it is related to her pet infrastructure project, the Suburban Rail Loop.

When repeatedly questioned about it on Tuesday, Allan replied that she’d have more to say in due course.

The government is due to award a $9 billion contract to install the tracks and operating systems for SRL East and build six stations on the proposed new line between Cheltenham and Box Hill.

This masthead reported in May that the government’s preferred bidder for the "line-wide" contract – the richest associated with the $34.5 billion project so far – was TransitLinX, a consortium comprising the Chinese-owned John Holland, WSP, Alstom, RATP Dev and KBR.

https://www.theage.com.au/national/victoria/teaching-mandarin-in-victorian-schools-student-exchange-top-of-china-strategy-20250916-p5mvhl.html

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ree_QL5f2VY

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122252

File: 7ee7c188d074168⋯.jpg (4.66 MB,3000x2000,3:2,Clipboard.jpg)

File: e7c90c626a0f879⋯.jpg (4.5 MB,2400x3000,4:5,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23608173 (161027ZSEP25) Notable: Veteran broadcaster Alan Jones charged over indecent assault allegations - (18 November 2024) - https://archive.vn/lfpNB#22008499

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Alan Jones hit with five new charges of indecent assault

Clare Sibthorpe - September 16, 2025

Former broadcaster Alan Jones has been charged with five more counts of indecent assault, adding to the already dozens of allegations against him spanning nearly two decades.

Court records show Jones was charged with the new offences on Monday, bringing the total number of counts to 40.

Following his arrest at his luxury harbourside apartment in Circular Quay late last year, the 84-year-old pleaded not guilty to the raft of indecent assault and sexual touching charges against 11 alleged victims aged 17 and over, allegedly committed between 2001 and 2019.

Jones initially faced 26 charges. Eight more were laid before his first court appearance in December, one more was pressed against him in March, and five more were laid this week.

The allegations across the dozens of counts include fondling penises, stroking thighs, squeezing bottoms, kissing “using his tongue”, pulling a man’s scrotum and masturbating during one alleged indecent assault, court documents earlier seen by this masthead outlined.

Jones is accused of committing the crimes at his former Newtown home, his harbourside apartment, his farm at Fitzroy Falls in the Southern Highlands, Tamworth in northern NSW, and other Sydney spots.

He had a mix of personal and professional relationships with his complainants, police have said, and some were allegedly abused upon meeting him.

Jones was set to face the local court on Thursday over the 35 earlier charges. He will now also face a first appearance on the fresh allegations.

At his last appearance in July, Jones’ high-profile lawyer Bryan Wrench said he held “grave concerns” about how police searched his client’s phone when he was arrested in November.

Wrench told the court NSW Police claimed to be working tirelessly, “but they seem to be a bit puffed out”, and successfully asked for an extension of the charge certification so that the search matter could be resolved.

After his first court appearance in December, Jones stood outside court and told journalists he was “certainly not guilty” and would “be presenting my account to a jury”.

“These allegations are all either baseless, or they distort the truth, and you should know that prior to my arrest, I was given no opportunity by police to answer these allegations,” he told media at the time.

When his case was briefly heard in May, Wrench said the defence had received a number of statements within the brief of evidence that his team felt were “blatantly contradictory to some of the allegations”, and it was a matter for the Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions (ODPP) “to consider whether this matter will be proceeding”.

“Some of the witnesses said they had never seen Mr Jones engage in any sexually inappropriate behaviour at all,” he said, and had earlier told the court his client “looks forward to clearing his name”.

Strike Force Bonnefin was established to investigate the former teacher and Wallabies coach following a major investigation by The Sydney Morning Herald and The Age which revealed allegations that Jones used his position of power to prey on a number of young men.

Jones announced his retirement from radio station 2GB in May 2020.

https://www.theage.com.au/national/nsw/alan-jones-hit-with-five-new-charges-of-indecent-assault-20250916-p5mvjm.html

https://qresear.ch/?q=Alan+Jones

Veteran broadcaster Alan Jones charged over indecent assault allegations

18 November 2024

https://archive.vn/lfpNB#22008499

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122253

File: e6ba937beb81c72⋯.mp4 (15.72 MB,640x360,16:9,Clipboard.mp4)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23613212 (170853ZSEP25) Notable: ‘You’re hurting Australia’:Donald Trump lashes ABC reporter while confirming Albanese meeting- (Video) Donald Trump confirmed he will meet Anthony Albanese next week while attacking ABC journalist John Lyons, accusing him of “hurting Australia” by asking about his family’s business dealings. Trump told Lyons he would raise the issue with Albanese, then pointed at the reporter and said “quiet.” The exchange, later promoted by the White House “Rapid Response” account on the X social media platform, came as Four Corners investigates Trump’s business links, including a $2bn UAE-backed investment in his World Liberty Financial venture. Albanese said he and Trump have already held four “warm” conversations and will meet in New York during UN leaders’ week, with trade, defence spending and AUKUS on the agenda.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122175

‘You’re hurting Australia’: Donald Trump lashes ABC reporter while confirming Albanese meeting

JOE KELLY - 17 September 2025

1/2

Donald Trump has confirmed an upcoming meeting with Anthony Albanese as he chastised an ABC journalist for asking about his family’s business activities, warning the line of questioning would harm the Australia-US relationship.

The US President took questions from the media at the White House before departing for his second state visit to Britain and was asked three questions by the ABC’s Americas editor, John Lyons, for an upcoming episode of Four Corners.

The questions ended with Mr Trump pointing at Lyons and telling him “quiet” before moving on to take other queries.

Mr Trump suggested Lyons’ questions would damage the Australia-US relationship and have diplomatic consequences in his upcoming meeting with Mr Albanese, although Jim Chalmers said later that the journalist was “just doing his job”. This was the first apparent confirmation from the White House of a meeting with the Australian Prime Minister, who is visiting the US next week, when he will address the UN General Assembly in New York.

The Australian contacted the White House, asking for any details of the meeting, its timing, location and any issues Mr Trump would raise, but was informed there was nothing to share beyond the President’s comments.

Mr Trump told Lyons that Australia was “trying to get along with me” and accused the journalist of setting a “very bad tone”.

Lyons asked the President how much wealthier he was now than when he was returned to the White House, to which Mr Trump replied: “I don’t know. The deals I made for the most part, other than what my kids are doing, you know, they are running my business, but mostly the deals I made, I made before.

“This is what I have done for a life. I’ve built buildings, like I am building a building here. You see that area? That is going to be the greatest ballroom anywhere else in the world. So it gives me pleasure to do it for the country. And I am paying for it. I think it will cost $US250m,” he said.

Following up, Lyons asked if it was “appropriate” that a sitting US President “should be engaged in so much business activity”.

Mr Trump responded by asking which media organisation Lyons worked for and then accused him of “hurting the Australians”.

“In my opinion, you are hurting Australia very much right now and they want to get along with me. You know your leader is coming over to see me very soon. I am going to tell him about you, you set a very bad tone – you can set a nicer tone,” he said.

Lyons tried to put another question to the President but Mr Trump turned and pointed, saying “quiet”.

Sources from Four Corners told The Australian that the program was conducting an investigation into Mr Trump’s business activities. Among other issues, the program will look at the recent $2bn investment by a United Arab Emirates-backed firm, using a new “stablecoin” issued by Mr Trump’s World Liberty Financial, in crypto exchange Binance – an action that has raised concern about conflicts of interest.

The official White House “rapid response” account on the X social media platform later posted the President’s exchange with Lyons with the caption “@POTUS saying that Mr Trump smacks down a rude foreign Fake News loser (many such cases): ‘Quiet’.”

Lyons told the ABC it was an “absurd” proposition that a few questions should inflict damage on the US relationship with Australia.

“If our job as journalists is to hold truth to power, then surely asking legitimate questions – politely – to the President of the United States should be acceptable. But in this day and age in America now, it’s not,” he said.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122254

File: dfaebda38b2f95f⋯.jpg (159.82 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 4008482fffffd7d⋯.jpg (320.66 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: aff81662ed4d3d4⋯.jpg (265.61 KB,750x688,375:344,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 37b0afce405573c⋯.mp4 (6.9 MB,960x540,16:9,Clipboard.mp4)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23613216 (170856ZSEP25) Notable: ‘You’re hurting Australia’:Donald Trump lashes ABC reporter while confirming Albanese meeting- (Video) Donald Trump confirmed he will meet Anthony Albanese next week while attacking ABC journalist John Lyons, accusing him of “hurting Australia” by asking about his family’s business dealings. Trump told Lyons he would raise the issue with Albanese, then pointed at the reporter and said “quiet.” The exchange, later promoted by the White House “Rapid Response” account on the X social media platform, came as Four Corners investigates Trump’s business links, including a $2bn UAE-backed investment in his World Liberty Financial venture. Albanese said he and Trump have already held four “warm” conversations and will meet in New York during UN leaders’ week, with trade, defence spending and AUKUS on the agenda.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122253

2/2

A meeting between Mr Trump and Mr Albanese comes at a crucial time, given the imposition of a 10 per cent baseline tariff on Australia, demands from Washington that Canberra increases defence spending to 3.5 per cent of GDP and an ongoing Pentagon review of the AUKUS submarine agreement.

Mr Trump and Mr Albanese are most likely to meet in New York or on the sidelines of the UN when the General Assembly begins its 80th session with a week of meetings.

Speaking to Sky News in Australia this week, Mr Albanese said: “We’ll meet. We’ve spoken four times. We’ve had really warm conversations. I look forward to – we won’t just see each other, obviously. We’ll see each other in New York. He’s hosting a reception on Tuesday night of next week.

“And, as well, we’ll see each other at various forums that are taking place between now and the end of the year. It’s summit season.”

Responding to the exchange between Mr Trump and Lyons, the Treasurer said: “President Trump and Prime Minister Albanese have had a number of very warm conversations already. I think four conversations at last count. And they’ll meet in due course.”

Dr Chalmers said, when it came to the ABC, he respected its independence. “And that extends to not second-guessing the questions asked legitimately by journalists at press conferences. Journalists have got a job to do and as far as I can tell that journalist was just doing his job in Washington DC.”

Housing Minister Clare O’Neil also told the Seven Network “the journalists are there to try to keep politicians accountable. And they are entitled to ask difficult questions.”

However, Liberal senator Sarah Henderson posted a clip of the exchange on social media, saying it was “not often an Australian journalist has the opportunity to interview the President of the United States”.

“At a time when trade, defence and national security are such crucial issues in our relationship with our closest ally, it would be helpful if the ABC could explain this line of questioning,” she said. “Australians should expect the highest standards of our publicly funded national broadcaster.”

Nationals senator Matt Canavan also told the Nine Network’s Today program “the ABC need to have a good look at themselves. I mean, what the hell are they doing with the billion dollars a year we give them??”

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/world/youre-hurting-australia-donald-trump-lashes-abc-reporter-while-confirming-albanese-meeting/news-story/3d217a30fbb766fae326ea71b9ce70f5

https://x.com/RapidResponse47/status/1967956300241031481

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122255

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23613224 (170907ZSEP25) Notable: ‘You’re hurting Australia’: Trump threatens ABC journalist in fiery clash – (Video) Donald Trump accused ABC journalist John Lyons of “hurting Australia” by questioning his business dealings, warning he would raise the matter with Anthony Albanese during their upcoming meeting. Trump promoted his family’s role in running his businesses, then pointed at Lyons and said “quiet.” The White House later shared the clip, calling Lyons a “rude foreign Fake News loser,” while Deputy Press Secretary Anna Kelly branded him a “nasty, anti-Trump activist.” The ABC defended Lyons as a respected journalist working on a Four Corners investigation. The clash came days before Albanese’s US visit, as Trump also filed a $US15bn lawsuit against The New York Times and, in a separate exchange, threatened Jon Karl, chief Washington correspondent for ABC News America, saying Attorney-General Pam Bondi “will probably go after people like you.”

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122175

>>122253

‘You’re hurting Australia’: Trump threatens ABC journalist in fiery clash

Michael Koziol - September 17, 2025

1/2

Washington: US President Donald Trump accused an ABC journalist of “hurting Australia” by asking questions about his personal business dealings in an intense, on-camera clash that comes just days before Trump is set to meet Prime Minister Anthony Albanese.

At a doorstop with reporters at the White House, the ABC’s Americas editor John Lyons began by asking Trump how much wealthier he was now than when he returned to the Oval Office in January.

“I don’t know,” Trump said. “Other than what my kids were doing ... mostly the deals that I’ve made were made before [taking office]. This is what I’ve done for a life. I’ve built buildings.”

Trump went on to promote the ballroom he has commissioned at the White House, saying it would be the greatest in the world, and he would foot the bill himself.

Lyons asked whether it was appropriate for a sitting president to be engaged in so much business activity.

“I’m really not, my kids are running the business,” Trump said. He then asked Lyons where he was from.

“I’m from the Australian Broadcasting Corporation, Four Corners program,” Lyons replied.

Trump said: “Oh, the Australian – you’re hurting Australia. In my opinion, you are hurting Australia very much right now. And they want to get along with me. You know, your leader is coming over to see me very soon. I’m going to tell him about you, you set a very bad tone.”

Lyons attempted to ask another question about a $US2 billion ($3 billion) deal between the United Arab Emirates’ ruling family and World Liberty Financial, a crypto company set up by the Trumps and the family of Trump’s special envoy Steve Witkoff.

The president moved on to another reporter, pointed a finger at Lyons and told him: “Quiet.”

An official White House account later posted a clip of the interaction with the caption: “[Trump] smacks down a rude foreign Fake News loser (many such cases).”

Contacted for comment, White House deputy press secretary Anna Kelly told this masthead: “President Trump is right – it is unbecoming of the great people of Australia for such a nasty, anti-Trump activist to pose as a reporter in order to ask dumb questions that have been answered time and time again.”

Lyons declined to comment, but said on air that it was “absurd” for the president to suggest that two or three legitimate questions should harm relations between the two countries.

“If our job as journalists is to hold truth to power, then surely asking legitimate questions – politely – to the President of the United States should be acceptable. But in this day and age in America now, it’s not,” he said.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122256

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23613243 (170934ZSEP25) Notable: Video: Donald Trump takes aim at ABC journalist as he suggests he'll meet Albanese 'very soon – Donald Trump clashed with ABC Americas editor John Lyons at the White House, accusing him of “hurting Australia” after questions on his business dealings. Trump said he would raise the matter with Anthony Albanese, adding: “Your leader is coming over to see me very soon.” When Lyons pressed further, Trump told him “quiet.” The White House later labelled Lyons a “foreign fake news loser,” while California Governor Gavin Newsom’s office criticised Trump’s remarks as intimidation. Lyons’ questions were part of a Four Corners investigation into Trump’s wealth, which Forbes recently estimated had risen to $US7.3bn.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122175

>>122253

Donald Trump takes aim at ABC journalist as he suggests he'll meet Albanese 'very soon'

Brad Ryan - 17 September 2025

1/2

Donald Trump has criticised the ABC's Americas editor during an extraordinary exchange at the White House, telling him, "You're hurting Australia," and he will tell Prime Minister Anthony Albanese about it.

Washington-based journalist John Lyons had asked the US president several questions about his business dealings, including: "Is it appropriate, President Trump, that a president in office should be engaged in so much business activity?"

"Well, I'm really not," Mr Trump said. "My kids are running the business. You know what the activity - where are you from?"

When Lyons told Mr Trump he was from the Australian Broadcasting Corporation, Mr Trump replied: "Oh, the Australian - you're hurting Australia.

"In my opinion, you are hurting Australia very much right now, and they want to get along with me.

"You know, your leader is coming over to see me very soon. I'm going to tell him about you. You set a very bad tone."

When Lyons attempted to ask a follow-up question, Mr Trump told him: "Quiet."

Mr Albanese is set to travel to New York for the UN General Assembly next week, and has indicated he hopes to meet Mr Trump while in the US.

He and Mr Trump have not met since their respective election wins, though Mr Trump's comments suggest a meeting is planned. The ABC has sought clarification from the White House and the Prime Minister's Office.

The Trump administration later continued the criticism online, using an official White House account to label Lyons a "foreign fake news loser" alongside a Fox News clip from the press conference.

The office of California's Democratic governor, Gavin Newsom, also tweeted the clip and wrote: "Why is Donald Trump threatening journalists? Our allies deserve respect, not intimidation."

Earlier in the exchange, Lyons asked Mr Trump how much wealthier he was now than when he returned to the White House.

Mr Trump responded: "Well, I don't know if the deals I made, for the most part - other than what my kids are doing, you know, they're running my business - but most of the deals that I've made were made before."

He then spoke about a new ballroom planned for the White House, which he said he would pay for personally.

Lyons's questions were part of an investigation by the ABC's Four Corners program into Mr Trump's business activities since his return to the presidency.

Several US media investigations have found Mr Trump's wealth has significantly increased during his time in office. Last week, business publication Forbes published its annual list of America's richest people, which estimated Mr Trump's wealth had grown from $US4.3 billion ($6.4 billion) to $US7.3 billion in a year.

ABC News director Justin Stevens said Lyons had the broadcaster's full support.

"John Lyons is a highly awarded journalist and one of the most experienced and respected reporters in Australia," Mr Stevens said.

"His job is to ask questions."

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122257

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23613281 (170954ZSEP25) Notable: Opinion: In Donald Trump's America, questions not to the president's liking are met with hostility"As America enters a dark tunnel of dangerous internal divisions … one of the most dramatic battlegrounds is the US president's war on the media. … We at the ABC had a taste of this new world ourselves this week. On behalf of Four Corners, I asked Trump some questions about how much his wealth had increased since he returned to the White House in January. … Because he is so rarely challenged these days, such questions seem hostile to him. Trump responded with a personal attack — with a hint of menace that there might be reprisals against Australia. In Donald Trump's America, questions not to the liking of the president are met not with answers but hostility." – John Lyons, ABC News Australia

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122175

>>122253

In Donald Trump's America, questions not to the president's liking are met with hostility

By Americas editor John Lyons in Washington DC - 17 September 2025

1/2

As America enters a dark tunnel of dangerous internal divisions and an increasingly violent public discourse, Donald Trump is escalating his attacks on many of this nation's institutions.

One of the most dramatic battlegrounds is the US president's war on the media.

It was typified this week when Trump announced he was beginning a $US15 billion ($22 billion) defamation lawsuit against The New York Times.

It was not for any particular article, but rather a general dislike of one of the country's oldest, and most cherished, institutions. Trump is arguing the paper has become a mouthpiece for the Democrats and in general defames him.

He's doing this because it works for him. His MAGA base — the Make America Great Again loyalists who twice propelled him into the White House — delight in his attacks on the media.

This is happening in both big and small ways. The big ways are the lawsuits and threats. The small ways are how the Trump White House is, day by day, changing the composition of the journalists who can question the president and his spokespeople.

In an increasingly right press pool, even centrists appear left

Almost every briefing she holds, White House spokesperson Karoline Leavitt introduces a new member to the press pool — usually a new right-wing media outlet.

And then, when the president or Leavitt front the media, more and more of these outlets are being called upon to ask questions — usually soft, often obsequious questions.

If Trump is getting questions he does not like — for example, anything related to the late sex offender Jeffrey Epstein — then often one of these favoured journalists will be given the call so that the pressure will be taken off.

On cue, those journalists will ask questions such as how well Trump's law and order crackdown in Washington DC is working.

This means any question that is neutral, or vaguely critical, stands out. For example, the questions from chief CNN White House correspondent Kaitlan Collins, an impeccably factual and objective journalist, seem hostile compared to those that often come before or after her.

Collins joined CNN from a right-wing media outlet and certainly has no left-wing pedigree. She is a professional journalist. Collins is rigorous in her inquiry of every guest she has on, but in the White House briefing room, with an increasing number of right-wing media, she appears to the left when she is in fact centrist.

Likewise, Collins's equivalent at Fox News, Peter Doocy, is a real journalist. While Fox News has a clear right-wing bias — as MSNBC has a clear left-wing bias — Doocy reports the facts as he sees them.

But compared to many of the new right-wing media in the White House, Doocy appears left of them when he is in fact centrist in his reporting.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122258

File: 084dd850c3acd11⋯.jpg (278.43 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 38e1a40ae215006⋯.jpg (428.14 KB,2048x1536,4:3,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23613299 (171007ZSEP25) Notable: PNG Australia defence treaty on the brink after ministerial no-show - A planned defence treaty between Australia and Papua New Guinea has stalled after PNG’s cabinet failed to achieve a quorum, leaving Anthony Albanese unable to confirm whether it will be signed during his visit. The “Pukpuk Treaty” would commit both nations to “act to meet the common danger” if attacked, placing it on par with Australia’s alliances with the US and New Zealand. Critics in PNG, including former defence chief Jerry Singirok and opposition leader Douglas Tomuriesa, warned it risks undermining sovereignty. The Albanese government maintains the treaty has overwhelming support.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122238

>>122242

>>122246

PNG Australia defence treaty on the brink after ministerial no-show

BEN PACKHAM - 16 September 2025

1/2

A hoped-for defence treaty that would herald an ANZUS-style ­alliance with Papua New Guinea is up in the air after the country’s cabinet failed to endorse it, leaving Anthony Albanese ­facing the prospect of a second ­failed ­Pacific deal aimed at side­lining China in a week.

The Prime Minister was unable to say on Tuesday whether the treaty would be inked the following day as planned, while his PNG counterpart James Marape told local media on Monday evening that “we’re not yet at the point of signing”.

The uncertainty followed ­Vanuatu’s last-minute refusal to sign a $500m bilateral security agreement last Tuesday when Mr Albanese was in Port Vila, amid suspected Chinese influence over senior government figures.

The text of the Australia-PNG treaty, obtained by The Australian, reveals the deal would ­commit Port Moresby to an ­alliance on par with the one ­Australia has with the US, requiring both countries to “act to meet the common danger” if either came under attack.

“It’s an upgrade in our security relationship to a treaty level, to the sort of level that we have with the United States and our important allies,” Mr Albanese declared on Monday.

As revealed by The Australian, PNG’s cabinet was unable to ­approve the deal after a number of ministers skipped a scheduled Monday meeting, preventing it from achieving a quorum.

Mr Albanese, in Port Moresby to mark the country’s 50th year of independence from Australia on Tuesday, brushed aside the development. “They didn’t have (a) quorum because everyone’s gone back to the places where they’re from to celebrate this as a celebration throughout the entire nation,” he said.

The Prime Minister declined to commit to signing the agreement during his trip, saying only that “will be able to advance the treaty tomorrow”.

“Prime Minister Marape is dealing with his cabinet, trying to deal with that remotely, but we’ll work those issues through, and it’s understandable,” Mr Albanese said. “We agree with the agreement. We are ready to sign off. Prime Minister Marape is talking to his cabinet who are in different parts of PNG, and we respect that process.”

Mr Albanese, who was the most senior regional leader to attend PNG’s independence celebrations, earlier committed Australia to funding a new ministerial wing for PNG’s parliament.

The cabinet meeting was ­aborted after warnings by respected former PNG defence chief Jerry Singirok and the country’s opposition that the agreement could threaten the nation’s sovereignty and violate its constitution.

Mr Marape said after the ministerial no-show that PNG’s pre-signing process was “still running”.

“Our cabinet is running its own process. And a treaty will eventually find its way into our national parliament … to give its blessing,” Mr Marape said.

The confusion over the agreement comes days after the Albanese government expressed high hopes for the treaty’s success.

Defence Minister Richard Marles said on Sunday the agreement “speaks to an enormous amount of ambition between our two countries to work even more closely together”.

“I believe what we’ll be signing in the next few days is a genuinely historic agreement between our two countries,” Mr Marles told Sky News.

Defence Industry Minister Pat Conroy, who is in PNG with Mr Albanese and Mr Marles, sidestepped a question on whether China was working behind the scenes to scuttle the treaty.

“This is just a question of logistics getting sufficient PNG ministers in a room to agree,” Mr Conroy told Sky News. “This was more about an administrative delay than anything else.”

He said the problem with the Vanuatu deal, which would give Australia a veto over Chinese involvement in key sectors, was about “how we give some more comfort to some of the questions about infrastructure investment”.

A spokesman for Sussan Ley said Mr Albanese had set a clear expectation the treaty would be signed this week, ”so reports suggesting this may not occur are concerning”.

“We cannot forget the recent falling through of a security with Vanuatu on the Prime Minister’s watch,” the Opposition Leader’s spokesman said.

The yet-to-be signed agreement would be known as the “Pukpuk Treaty”, the leaked document said, after the PNG pidgin word for “crocodile”.

“The treaty is meant to prepare our militaries to be battle ready and for a very bad day,” an attached PNG cabinet submission said.

“It has the ability to bite, and like a crocodile, its bite force speaks of the interoperability and preparedness of the military for war.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122259

File: 3d3cb092e96f2ef⋯.jpg (1.99 MB,4240x2832,265:177,Clipboard.jpg)

File: c8ae6437785badc⋯.jpg (263.98 KB,1638x2048,819:1024,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 573c3964681c503⋯.jpg (398.73 KB,1638x2048,819:1024,Clipboard.jpg)

File: bfb17d690859557⋯.jpg (214.77 KB,1240x1759,1240:1759,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23613307 (171015ZSEP25) Notable: Australia and PNG fail to clinch defence agreement, resorting to communique - Australia and Papua New Guinea have failed to finalise their planned defence treaty, instead signing a communique while PNG’s cabinet continues to deliberate. The “Pukpuk Treaty” would commit both nations to mutual defence, joining the US and New Zealand as Australia’s only formal military allies. Anthony Albanese said the text was agreed and the delay was “perfectly understandable” given PNG’s independence celebrations, while James Marape stressed PNG was “a democracy” and that sovereignty was respected. Marape dismissed suggestions of Chinese obstruction, declaring Australia PNG’s “security partner of choice.” Analysts cautioned the text technically remains negotiable until formal signature.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122238

>>122242

>>122246

>>122258

Australia and PNG fail to clinch defence agreement, resorting to communique

Marian Faa and Stephen Dziedzic - 17 September 2025

A major defence treaty between Australia and Papua New Guinea has failed to get over the line today, with the countries resorting to signing a communique in lieu of the actual document.

Papua New Guinea's cabinet has not yet approved the treaty, throwing a spanner in the works for Australia, which was hoping to clinch the high-level agreement this week.

The landmark mutual defence treaty would see Australia and PNG commit to defending each other in the event of a military attack.

But after signing the communique both Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and PNG's Prime Minister James Marape played down the delay.

Mr Albanese has previously said PNG's cabinet couldn't reach quorum to sign off on the deal on Monday evening because some Ministers were absent due to 50th anniversary commemorations.

This morning Mr Albanese said it had been a "busy week" in PNG and that the wait was "perfectly understandable". He said he expected it to be signed in "coming weeks."

"One of the things about this, not just this treaty, but this relationship, is we respect sovereignty," he said.

"The wording has been agreed to. The communique today, as signed, outlines precisely what is in the treaty."

Mr Marape said there was "no sticking point" about the pact, and suggested that PNG's cabinet would sign off on the document shortly.

"We're not running a military dictatorship here, we're a democracy," he said.

The communique released outlines the major components of the Pukpuk treaty — the details of which the ABC revealed earlier this week.

It also says the treaty will create an "alliance" between the two countries with Mr Albanese calling the document an "historic move forward".

Mr Marape said PNG would soon join the United States and New Zealand as only Australia's third formal military ally under the pact.

"What this does is formalise what I think is a common sense position resulting from our history and resulting from our geography," he said.

"This is in the interests of Papua New Guinea and in the interests of Australia."

Security partner of choice

PNG's Defence Minister Billy Joseph warned earlier this week that "external" players had tried to sink the agreement.

But Mr Marape brushed off a question about whether China might use the delay to obstruct the pact.

"Let's give respect to China it has been an enduring friend [but] China also knows clearly: we have our security partners of choice," he said.

He also said that Dr Joseph, the country's defence minister, would visit multiple countries across the region - including China and PNG's direct neighbour Indonesia - to explain the treaty and to explain why PNG was making the choice to partner much more closely with Australia.

Mr Marape also declared that he had a responsibility to build up the capabilities of the PNG defence force under the treaty, saying there were compelling reasons to draw much closer to Australia and benefit from its high end military technology.

And he insisted it was Papua New Guinea that had approached Australia asking for the new military alliance, not the other way around.

"It's in our shared interests that our defence forces are interoperable, my number one task is to protect the country," he said.

"In the interests of protecting the country, I'm making this call."

While both governments insist the delay will only be temporary and the text is now agreed, Professor of International Law from the Australian National University, Don Rothwell, said it would be possible for either country to make changes right up until the final signing.

"Prior to signature of the treaty it technically remains under negotiation and as such if the PNG cabinet requests some change to the language to the text of the treaty that remains possible," he said.

"Once the treaty has been signed then adjustment of the text of the treaty becomes much more difficult."

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-09-17/australia-png-fail-defence-agreement-communique/105782424

https://x.com/AlboMP/status/1968108784817238150

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122260

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23613325 (171026ZSEP25) Notable: COMMENTARY: Albanese faces embarrassment over PNG deal as China prepares to swing in - “Anthony Albanese came to PNG expecting to ink a momentous ANZUS-style treaty … He left, instead, with a flimsy commitment to sign the treaty at an undisclosed date, after PNG’s cabinet failed to endorse the deal… The fact that this is the second such failure in just over a week is highly embarrassing… Marape must get cabinet agreement for the treaty text, which confirms PNG would be required to ‘act to meet the common danger’ if Australia came under attack… There’s only one potential adversary of consequence this could apply to - the People’s Republic of China… China will also swing into action to try to derail the agreement… The blame for this highly damaging failure rests with Albanese.” – Ben Packham, The Australian

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122199

>>122243

>>122246

>>122259

>>122253

Albanese faces high-stakes Trump talks after PNG treaty setback

Matthew Knott - September 17, 2025

1/2

Anthony Albanese is being urged to lobby Donald Trump to step up efforts to counter China’s influence and stop key regional partnerships from falling into oblivion after Australia failed to strike a historic defence treaty with Papua New Guinea.

Albanese returned to Australia from Port Moresby on Wednesday without finalising a sweeping alliance-level agreement with PNG as planned, making it the government’s second Pacific security agreement to founder in the past eight days.

As the federal opposition accused the government of “a serious foreign policy embarrassment”, a former PNG military commander predicted resistance to the pact would grow in PNG as its details become widely known and accused Australia of trying to “ambush” its closest neighbour.

Trump suggested he would meet with Albanese during a fiery exchange with veteran Australian journalist John Lyons outside the White House, but a meeting has not been formally locked in for Albanese’s trip to the United Nations General Assembly in New York next week.

Kurt Campbell, a respected foreign policy veteran who served as former president Joe Biden’s Indo-Pacific tsar, called for Albanese to use his “momentous” first meeting with Trump to try to salvage the Quad, a high-profile partnership between the US, Australia, Japan and India that has served as a democratic counterweight to China in the Indo-Pacific.

“I think it’s probably the most consequential meeting between an American and Australian in living memory,” Campbell told a United States Studies Centre event in Sydney. “And really, everything is on the table.”

Trump’s decision to impose punishing tariffs on India has thrown the Quad – the diplomatic partnership between Australia, India, Japan, and the United States – into doubt and drawn the Modi government closer to China.

“I believe that the Quad has been a central feature of global diplomacy. It kind of hangs in the balance right now because of the alienation between Delhi and Washington,” Campbell said.

“I think the only country, the only leader that can help carefully navigate that back together is Prime Minister Albanese.”

Campbell, who met with Foreign Minister Penny Wong this week, urged Albanese to be ambitious rather than cautious in any meeting with Trump, declaring it “a time to demonstrate Australian leadership”.

“I think Australia can make an argument for the United States to continue to step up in the Pacific,” he said. “Australia cannot manage this enormous strategic competition alone.”

Australia’s ambassador to the US, Kevin Rudd, told the same event that “a principal driving factor in the pan-regional disruption that we are facing is the rise and rise of China, strategically, militarily and economically.”

The failure to sign the defence treaty during Albanese’s visit to PNG is another setback in the Pacific after Vanuatu abruptly shelved plans to sign a security deal with Australia during his visit last week.

Difficulties in organising a quorum of PNG cabinet ministers during the nation’s 50th anniversary of independence celebrations delayed the finalising of the pact.

Albanese and PNG Prime Minister James Marape instead signed a communique agreeing on the text of the delayed treaty, which still needs to be approved by PNG’s cabinet.

Albanese sought to shrug off the delay by suggesting that the treaty could be signed within weeks during a possible visit by Marape to Australia in October.

“This treaty will elevate our relationship to the status of an alliance,” Albanese said, stressing it was PNG’s idea to strike the agreement.

“It will be Australia’s first new alliance in more than 70 years, and only the third in our entire history, along with the Anzac treaty with New Zealand and the United States.”

Asked if the failure to sign the treaty on Wednesday was embarrassing, Albanese said that “we respect sovereignty and we respect the processes of the Papua New Guinea government”.

At a joint press conference, Marape was emphatic that China had played no role in delaying the treaty.

“This is in no way, shape or form Chinese have any hand in saying don’t do this,” he said.

“In fact, in the next two days or so, I will dispatch our defence minister to go first to China, and elsewhere – USA, France, India, Indonesia, Malaysia, Singapore, Philippines – to inform all exactly what this is all about.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122261

File: 66b49f7bb6c7ee0⋯.jpg (480.91 KB,1638x2048,819:1024,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23613390 (171057ZSEP25) Notable: Analysis: Albanese was chasing a big announcement. He got a reality check instead - “To misquote Oscar Wilde: to fall short on one Pacific treaty may look like misfortune, but to fall short on two looks like carelessness… Despite the government’s bullish rhetoric, something has clearly gone wrong behind the scenes on planning and communications… The effort has been there, but not the execution… An alliance agreement of this magnitude would usually take years, not months, to reach… Australians dubious about handing billions of dollars to PNG… will not be impressed… These are weighty questions that merit vigorous discussion… Either way, the diplomatic knife fight in the Pacific carries on. As necessary as they are, ambition and effort are no guarantee of triumph.” – Matthew Knott, The Age

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122199

>>122243

>>122246

>>122259

Albanese was chasing a big announcement. He got a reality check instead

Matthew Knott - September 17, 2025

1/2

To misquote Oscar Wilde: to fall short on one Pacific treaty may look like misfortune, but to fall short on two looks like carelessness.

Last week, Anthony Albanese left Vanuatu without finalising a landmark security pact; this week, he departed Papua New Guinea without striking a sweeping defence treaty. The plan was for both to be signed during Albanese’s visits, but neither Vanuatu nor PNG were able to close out deals that had been framed as faits accomplis.

Despite the government’s bullish rhetoric, something has clearly gone wrong behind the scenes on planning and communications for Albanese’s latest Pacific trips, fuelling expectations of imminent foreign policy triumphs that fail to materialise.

It’s a sobering – indeed, galling – reality check for Australia on the difficulties of Pacific diplomacy in an era of fierce geostrategic competition.

The prime minister can travel across the region and build relationships with his counterparts. He can pursue bold agreements and offer Australia’s economically challenged neighbours buckets of cash. That doesn’t mean he will be able to seal the deal.

The government’s previous efforts to deepen Australia’s influence in the Pacific and curtail China’s clout in the region have undoubtedly been a major foreign policy success. Since coming to office, Albanese has struck innovative agreements with Tuvalu and Nauru that offer financial and migration support in exchange for locking China out of a security role.

He has spearheaded a Pacific-wide policing initiative aimed at excluding Beijing, and championed PNG’s entry into the National Rugby League.

Locked in what government officials describe as a daily “knife fight” against China in the Pacific, Australia has managed to inflict plenty of wounds on its opponent. That run of victories has now stalled.

The Morrison government was criticised for a lack of energy and commitment to the Pacific, allowing China to swoop in and strike a security pact with Solomon Islands in 2022. That’s not the problem here. If anything, the Albanese government has rushed to reach ambitious agreements that would usually take much longer to achieve. The effort has been there, but not the execution.

According to Defence Minister Richard Marles, the seeds for the Australia-PNG defence treaty were sown in January during discussions about updating existing security agreements with his counterpart, Billy Joseph. The two countries set the goal of signing a deal during PNG’s 50th anniversary celebrations in September.

This was a rapid time frame for a historic elevation of the countries’ relationship that would see them integrate their defence forces, commit to come to each other’s aid if under attack, and allow Australia unimpeded access to designated military facilities in PNG.

An alliance agreement of this magnitude would usually take years, not months, to reach.

And there was always something jarring about the idea of announcing the integration of the two nations’ militaries just as PNG was marking its independence from Australia. The colonial overtones were unavoidable, even if it was PNG that sought the agreement in the first place.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122262

File: 1d1bb5a951e6f3e⋯.jpg (137.09 KB,1439x810,1439:810,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23613408 (171106ZSEP25) Notable: Kevin Rudd calls out China’s Pacific ambition - Kevin Rudd has accused Beijing of being the “principal driving factor” behind disruption in the Indo-Pacific, using tougher language than Anthony Albanese has employed. Speaking via video to a United States Studies Centre event, Rudd said China’s rapid military expansion, including a surface fleet now larger than America’s, and coercive economic behaviour had “deep significance.” He cited the PLA Navy’s circumnavigation of Australia and live-fire drills in the Tasman Sea. Rudd argued Australia must rely on US partnership, intelligence assets, and defence industry ties to counter Beijing, expressing confidence AUKUS will withstand its current review. Former US intelligence chief Avril Haine also urged aggressive joint pushback, highlighting expanded trilateral intelligence cooperation with Japan.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122176

>>122199

>>122243

>>122246

>>122259

Kevin Rudd calls out China’s Pacific ambition

CAMERON STEWART - 17 September 2025

Kevin Rudd has accused China of being the principal architect of disruption across the Indo-Pacific, using much tougher language than the Prime Minister has used recently in calling out Beijing’s regional ambitions.

In a hawkish statement ahead of an expected meeting between Anthony Albanese and Donald Trump in New York this month, in which China will be a key focus, Mr Rudd said he believed that Australia and the US, working together as close allies, could combat China’s disruptive behaviour.

“On the nature of the disruption we’re facing in the Indo-Pacific, let’s be very clear that in the Indo-Pacific, a principal driving factor in the pan-regional disruption that we are facing is the rise and rise of China, strategically, militarily and economically,” Mr Rudd told a United States Studies Centre conference in Sydney via video from Washington.

“I remain bullish about Australia’s capacity to navigate these great disruptions in partnership with the United States of America under the Trump administration.”

His comments came amid growing suspicion of China’s role in delaying a security deal between Australia and PNG, and disrupting another security agreement between Australia and Vanuatu in the past week.

Mr Albanese has been criticised by many China strategists for refusing to call out Beijing on its behaviour in the region for fear of upsetting the improved bilateral relationship.

But Mr Rudd, who as prime minister called for the doubling of Australia’s submarine fleet to deal with a rising China, took aim at Beijing’s record military spending and its economic coercion.

“If we look purely through the military lens, the fact that China’s defence expenditure continues to grow and grow and grow, and outpace in growth terms those military outlays of other countries across the region, is of itself deeply significant,” he said.

“If you look at simply one domain of that, which is the expansion of China’s surface fleet, now the largest single surface fleet in the world, having passed the United States several years ago in aggregate size and the manifestation of that surface fleet activity around the wider region, this itself has a significance.

“We saw that most recently, in the case of the PLA Navy’s circumnavigation of the Australian continent and its live-fire exercises in the Tasman Sea.”

Mr Rudd suggested the rise of China, a common threat in the region, played a role in bringing the US and Australia closer together as allies.

“We need each other’s militaries. We need each other’s intelligence assets, irreplaceable intelligence assets. We need each other’s defence industrial base. We need each other’s trade,” he said.

He described the security, defence and intelligence relationship as going from strength to strength and said he believed the AUKUS nuclear submarine plan would not be knocked off course by the Pentagon’s review of the three-nation pact.

“It’s one of the reasons why I’m absolutely confident that Australia will also navigate successfully the upcoming review of AUKUS,” he said, adding that such a review was entirely appropriate.

Despite Mr Albanese having failed to have a meeting with the US President so far, Mr Rudd described the relationship between the two countries as being in “first-class working order”.

“The Prime Minister has already had four sets of telephone conversations with President Trump over the last eight months. Certainly better than my batting average when I was prime minister,” Mr Rudd said.

Mr Albanese is expected to finally meet with Mr Trump on the sidelines of the UN General Assembly meeting in New York this month.

Meanwhile, former US director of national intelligence Avril Haine told the USSC conference that Australia and the US needed to push back aggressively together against Beijing’s disruptive ambitions in the region.

“We have to be extremely diligent in pushing back against, essentially, the aggression that we see, and to ultimately, through that pushing back, deter future aggression (from China),” she said.

Ms Haine, who oversaw US intelligence during the Biden administration, said there had been a “revolution” in intelligence co-operation between Australia, the US and Japan in recent years in the face of China’s rise.

This has allowed these allies to “arrive at a more comprehensive shared understanding of what that threat landscape looked like, so that we could then begin to identify possible options for response (and) then begin to help our leaders understand how other partners and countries were perceiving the threats that they were dealing with (and) how they would perceive the response options that were possible”, she said.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/world/kevin-rudd-calls-out-chinas-pacific-ambition/news-story/b4303731047ff0cc3eac88fb92199674

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122263

File: 088d732dfa1e947⋯.jpg (176.99 KB,2047x1152,2047:1152,Clipboard.jpg)

File: de20b0796daa515⋯.jpg (286.63 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 3160f28c45bf0e0⋯.jpg (3.12 MB,1878x3101,1878:3101,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23613432 (171123ZSEP25) Notable: Beijing huffs about Albanese government’s “two-faced policy towards China” - Beijing has accused Canberra of trying to “butter bread on both sides,” with state-run China Daily warning that Australia’s “two-faced policy towards China is not sustainable.” The editorial, timed for the Australia-China High Level Dialogue in Beijing, urged Australia to treat China as a “responsible major country” rather than deepen military ties with the US, Japan, and the Philippines. It criticised AUKUS and recent joint exercises in the South China Sea as “provocative,” while noting Australia continues to benefit from China trade. The paper cautioned that cooperation depends on Canberra ceasing “infringements on [China’s] core interests.”

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122162

>>122244

>>122199

>>122246

>>122259

Beijing huffs about Albanese government’s “two-faced policy towards China”

WILL GLASGOW - 17 September 2025

1/2

Beijing has warned Canberra that it “cannot butter bread on both sides”, as Xi Jinping’s government becomes increasingly frustrated with Anthony ­Albanese’s “two-faced policy ­towards China”.

The warning was delivered as former Labor trade minister Craig Emerson and former Howard government minister Warwick Smith led a track 1.5 dialogue – featuring official and unofficial participants – on Wednesday with senior Chinese counterparts in Beijing.

It also came as Dan Andrews’s successor as Victoria’s Premier, Jacinta Allan, continued a four-city tour of China as she tries to attract Chinese investment, tourism and students, while the Prime Minister has been in Port Moresby trying to get Papua New Guinea to sign a transformational China-focused defence treaty.

Beijing again used the state-owned China Daily to deliver its sharp critique of the federal Australian government, which has frustrated President Xi by continuing to deepen security links with America and fellow US allies in Asia even as the diplomatic and trade relationship with China has improved.

“[Australia’s] two-faced policy towards China is not sustainable in the long run,” the China Daily wrote in an editorial that was timed for the annual “Australia-China High Level Dialogue”, which was held in Beijing’s Diaoyutai State Guesthouse on Wednesday.

“The Australian government is urged to develop a rational perception of China as not only Australia’s largest trading partner but also a responsible major country committed to promoting peace and stability in the Asia-Pacific region and beyond,” the masthead added.

Pointed editorials in the Chinese government’s most authoritative English language newspaper have become increasingly frequent since Donald Trump’s return to the White House.

In recent months, Beijing has used the mouthpiece, which is closely read by the diplomatic corps in China, to express its hopes that Canberra might leave the AUKUS defence technology partnership and, last week, to express the Chinese government’s fury at Australia’s co-ordination with Japan over what China calls its “core interests”.

The latest spray comes only days after Australia was selected as the “guest country of honour” at the China International Fair for Trade in Services, or CIFTIS, which was held last week in Beijing.

Australian businesses and institutions that exhibited at the marquee trade show, including Penfolds’ parent company Treasury Wine Estates, a host of universities including ANU, Deakin and Adelaide University, and Tourism Australia, have been delighted by the favourable coverage in Chinese media.

Chinese government officials have long complained that Australia has worked with America and other allies and partners to constrain China’s military power even as China has become Australia’s biggest export market.

That duality was represented in the stately room in Beijing on Wednesday at the “High Level Dialogue” where, along with Dr Emerson and Mr Smith (dubbed “Mr China” for his decades of business experience in the country), Australia’s delegates included Gerhard Veldsman, an executive at Gina Rinehart’s China-focused iron ore company Hancock, Luke Sheehy, the head of Universities Australia (whose members are hugely dependent on high fee-paying Chinese international students), and David Jochinke, president of the National Farmers Federation (the peak body for many of the companies caught up in China’s 2020-24 trade coercion campaign).

Also on Australia side of the table were DFAT deputy secretary Elly Lawson (who is on Foreign Minister Penny Wong’s shortlist to be Australia’s next ambassador to Japan), Australia’s ambassador in China Scott Dewar (the AUKUS envoy during the Morrison government), Lowy Institute senior fellow Richard McGregor (an internationally respected expert on the Chinese Communist Party) and former Royal Australian Navy officer Jennifer Parker, now an expert at the ANU National Security College and one of the Australia’s most eloquent AUKUS supporters.

The discussions in Beijing were held behind closed doors, with delegates told to not publicise their discussions.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122264

File: 254c064d2e777b5⋯.jpg (303.41 KB,3800x3038,1900:1519,Clipboard.jpg)

File: ba159523d31cbab⋯.jpg (45.16 KB,1240x828,310:207,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23617341 (180847ZSEP25) Notable: ABC barred from Trump’s UK press conference after his clash with Australian journalist John Lyons - The ABC has been blocked from Donald Trump’s press conference near London after its Americas editor, John Lyons, clashed with the US President in Washington over his business dealings. Downing Street told the broadcaster its accreditation was withdrawn for “logistical reasons.” Trump accused Lyons of “hurting Australia” and warned he would raise the matter with Anthony Albanese, before telling him to “quiet.” The Trump administration later branded Lyons a “foreign fake news loser.” Australian politicians and ABC news director Justin Stevens defended Lyons, insisting “his job is to ask questions.”

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122175

>>122253

ABC barred from Trump’s UK press conference after his clash with Australian journalist John Lyons

Exclusive: London bureau of Australia’s national broadcaster informed accreditation removed for ‘logistical reasons’

Amanda Meade - 18 Sep 2025

The ABC has been barred from attending Donald Trump’s press conference near London this week after a clash between the broadcaster’s Americas editor, John Lyons, and the president in Washington DC over his business dealings.

The Australian broadcaster said its London bureau was informed by Downing Street that its accreditation to attend the press conference had been withdrawn for “logistical reasons”.

Trump was due to have lunch with the British prime minister, Keir Starmer, at the latter’s country retreat of Chequers on Thursday before the joint press conference.

“We have been given no indication this is connected to the questions put to President Trump by ABC Americas editor John Lyons earlier this week.”

Trump accused the reporter of “hurting Australia” with the line of questioning.

“In my opinion, you are hurting Australia very much right now,” Trump said. “And they want to get along with me.

“You know, your leader is coming over to see me very soon. I’m going to tell him about you. You set a very bad tone. You can set a nicer tone.”

Trump subsequently told Lyons: “Quiet.”

Guardian Australia understands the ABC still has access to the White House.

The Trump administration used an official X account to label Lyons a “foreign fake news loser” alongside a Fox News clip from the Washington press conference.

He asked: “Is it appropriate, President Trump, that a president in office should be engaged in so much business activity?”

“Well, I’m really not,” Trump replied. “My kids are running the business. You know what the activity – where are you from?”

Australia’s politicians threw their support behind the Washington-based Lyons after Trump said he would tell the Australian prime minister, Anthony Albanese, about the exchange.

The Greens senator Sarah Hanson-Young said Trump was trying to bully the media and Australia and demanded Albanese stand up to criticism of Australian journalists.

The ABC news director, Justin Stevens, said Lyons had the broadcaster’s full support.

“John Lyons is a highly awarded journalist and one of the most experienced and respected reporters in Australia,” Stevens said. “His job is to ask questions.”

https://www.theguardian.com/media/2025/sep/18/abc-barred-from-trumps-uk-press-conference-after-clash-with-australian-journalist-john-lyons

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122265

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23617346 (180900ZSEP25) Notable: Video: King backs AUKUS, Ukraine in message to Trump - King Charles has urged US President Donald Trump to treat the AUKUS submarine pact as a vital alliance, directly linking it to Britain’s historic partnership with the US and Australia during two world wars. At a Windsor Castle state banquet, the King also called for stronger US support for Ukraine against Russia. His intervention comes as the Pentagon reviews AUKUS, with sceptics like US defence Under Secretary Elbridge Colby fuelling uncertainty. Trump praised the UK relationship in glowing terms but avoided concrete defence commitments. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky publicly thanked the King for his “steadfast support.”

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122177

>>122253

>>122264

King backs AUKUS, Ukraine in message to Trump

David Crowe - September 18, 2025

1/2

London: King Charles has lent his weight to the AUKUS submarine pact in a direct message to US President Donald Trump to treat it as a vital alliance, just as Britain and Australia await a Pentagon review that fuels doubts about the vast project.

Addressing a state banquet to honour Trump with lavish ceremony at Windsor Castle, the King reminded the president of the British alliance with the US during two world wars and linked this directly to the AUKUS pact with Australia.

The remark came with a message to Trump to help Ukraine defend itself against Russian forces – just as British Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer and European leaders privately lobby for tougher US action to stop the war.

“Our countries have the closest defence, security and intelligence relationship ever known,” Charles said to Trump.

“In two world wars, we fought together to defeat the forces of tyranny. Today, as tyranny once again threatens Europe, we and our allies stand together in support of Ukraine to deter aggression and secure peace.

“And our AUKUS submarine partnership, with Australia, sets the benchmark for innovative and vital collaboration.”

The message highlights the British support for Australia and AUKUS when Prime Minister Anthony Albanese is preparing to meet Trump in the US next week, with the defence pact a key priority.

Banquet guests included tech billionaires and banking chiefs as well as News Corp media mogul Rupert Murdoch, combining hard power and high glamour in St George’s Hall at Windsor Castle.

While the King did not elaborate on the AUKUS agreement, his words emphasised the value of the pact when the Pentagon is yet to reveal its review of the program and some key aides – such as defence Under Secretary Elbridge Colby – are openly sceptical about the deal.

The message signals the importance of AUKUS in Starmer’s talks with Trump this week, when the prime minister is also expected to urge Trump to do more to help Ukraine.

Trump responded with effusive praise for the King, but avoided any direct engagement with the monarch’s strategic message. He said his state visit to the UK this week – an unprecedented second state visit for a US leader – was one of the highest honours of his life.

The president also described the relationship between the US and UK in glowing terms, although without any specific commitments on defence or trade.

“We’re like two notes in one chord or two verses of the same poem, each beautiful on its own, but really meant to be played together,” he said.

“The bond of kinship and identity between America and the United Kingdom is priceless and eternal. It’s irreplaceable and unbreakable. And we are, as a country, as you know, doing unbelievably well.

“We had a very sick country one year ago,” he said but did not go further by laying blame for this on his political foes or his predecessor, Joe Biden, and he instead spoke of the relationship between the US and UK.

“We’ve done more good for humanity than any two countries in all of history,” he said.

“Together, we must defend the exceptional heritage that makes us who we are, and we must continue to stand for the values of the people of the English-speaking world, and we do indeed stand for that.”

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky posted a message on social media to thank the King for his “steadfast support”, and he added that the UK was defending freedom when tyranny threatened Europe.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122266

File: a30b0e3bb04d799⋯.jpg (286.63 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: bd2524791f002aa⋯.jpg (181.94 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 9d952fa1d8adb71⋯.jpg (1.75 MB,1287x2046,39:62,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23617355 (180920ZSEP25) Notable: Australia, UK and Canada Jewish groups make last-ditch plea not to recognise Palestine - The top Jewish organisations of Australia, the UK and Canada have issued a rare joint appeal urging their governments not to recognise a Palestinian state at the upcoming UN summit. The Executive Council of Australian Jewry, the Board of Deputies of British Jews, and the Canadian Centre for Israel and Jewish Affairs warned recognition would be “seen by Hamas as a reward for its violence and rejectionism” and could undermine efforts to free hostages. They said recognition without Hamas’ disarmament “lacks credibility, borders on recklessness” and risks setting Palestinian statehood up for failure.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109520 (pb)

>>109521 (pb)

>>109531 (pb)

Australia, UK and Canada Jewish groups make last-ditch plea not to recognise Palestine

NOAH YIM - 18 September 2025

The top Jewish community organisations of Australia, the UK, and Canada have made a last-ditch joint plea to their governments not to recognise a state of Palestine at the upcoming United Nations summit.

Anthony Albanese is scheduled to head off to New York over the weekend to attend the UN heads of state summit, where he has said Australia will recognise a state of Palestine as a part of a two-state solution process, rather than end result.

This followed similar moves by the UK and Canada – except those pledges were contingent on Israel’s actions – as well as France, Belgium, and Luxembourg.

The Executive Council of Australian Jewry, the Board of Deputies of British Jews, and the Canadian Centre for Israel and Jewish Affairs on Thursday published a rare joint statement warning that recognition of a Palestinian state would be “seen by Hamas as a reward for its violence and rejectionism towards Israel” and that those three governments’ respective announcements they would recognise Palestine had “lessened rather than maximised pressure for the hostages’ release and for Hamas to disarm”.

“It will therefore set back rather than advance prospects for a genuine peace based on the internationally-endorsed principle of two states for two peoples,” the statement reads.

The statement said Hamas’ surrender of Israeli hostages, relinquishing of power and disarmament were not conditions set on the three countries’ plans to recognise a Palestinian state and that this amounted to those conditions being “taken on trust”.

“This is a posture that lacks credibility, borders on recklessness, and sets up Palestinian statehood for failure from the outset,” they said.

“We urge our governments to reconsider.”

The organisations acknowledged the “terrible humanitarian conditions in Gaza are a source of great concern to us all, and need to be addressed urgently”.

“Recognising a Palestinian state while Hamas remains armed and in control of territory would also be a betrayal of the Palestinians who remain under Hamas’ control and have become increasingly vocal in their opposition to being ruled by a terrorist organisation.”

They said they were “gravely concerned that our governments’ announced intentions to recognise a Palestinian state at the UN this month are seen by Hamas as a reward for its violence and rejectionism towards Israel, and these announcements have therefore lessened rather than maximised pressure for the hostages’ release and for Hamas to disarm”.

“Indeed, Hamas has welcomed our governments’ declarations of an intention to recognise a Palestinian state at the UN later this month as the ‘fruits of October 7’.”

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/australia-uk-and-canada-jewish-groups-make-lastditch-plea-not-to-recognise-palestine/news-story/490f4991ed42409eef7f4c89561e1c24

https://www.ecaj.org.au/joint-statement-from-jewish-community-organisations-in-australia-canada-and-the-uk-on-palestinian-statehood/

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122267

File: 918954710be519d⋯.jpg (246.39 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 135cde390e6b3f4⋯.jpg (252.34 KB,2009x1130,2009:1130,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23617361 (180931ZSEP25) Notable: PNG to consult Beijing on Australian defence treaty - Papua New Guinea Prime Minister James Marape will send Defence Minister Billy Joseph to Beijing to explain the delayed “Pukpuk Treaty” with Australia, giving China a high-level chance to challenge the pact. Anthony Albanese left Port Moresby without signing the mutual defence treaty, settling instead for a communique after PNG’s cabinet failed to reach quorum. The deal would commit both nations to “act to meet the common danger” if attacked, but critics in PNG warn it threatens sovereignty and risks breaching the constitution. Beijing, already warning against alliances that “target third countries”, is expected to lobby hard. Albanese said cabinet approval in PNG was still pending but insisted Australia is “ready to go.”

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122199

>>122243

>>122246

>>122259

PNG to consult Beijing on Australian defence treaty

BEN PACKHAM - 17 September 2025

1/2

Papua New Guinea Prime Minister James Marape will give China a high-level opportunity to scuttle PNG’s stalled “mutual defence” treaty with Australia, dispatching his Defence Minister to Beijing to explain the deal after he and Anthony Albanese failed to sign it on Wednesday as planned.

The Prime Minister returned to Australia after three days in Port Moresby without finalising the promised alliance in his second abortive bid for a Pacific ­security agreement in eight days.

Mr Albanese and his PNG counterpart instead signed a communique recommitting to the treaty and insisted it would be signed in coming weeks. But there were no guarantees it would be endorsed by PNG’s cabinet, which failed to green light it on Monday as expected because it could not achieve a quorum as the country celebrated its 50th anniversary of independence.

Mr Albanese’s inability to land the treaty was a blow to his government’s push to lock out Beijing from closer ties with key Pacific island states, and followed Vanuatu’s last-minute rejection of a $500m security and economic agreement.

The Coalition said the lack of a concrete outcome was a “serious foreign policy embarrassment” after Mr Albanese declared just a day earlier: “It will get done.”

Mr Marape urged “respect” for China’s role as one of PNG’s key partners, and said he was upfront with Beijing that his country’s key security relationship was with Australia.

“In no way, shape or form (did the) Chinese have any hand in saying ‘don’t do this’,” he said.

But Mr Marape will expose PNG to Chinese anger over the agreement, revealing his Defence Minister, Billy Joseph, would go on a “road show” in coming days to explain to Beijing and other diplomatic partners “exactly what this is all about”.

Former Department of Home Affairs secretary Michael Pezzullo said China would do “everything that it can to persuade PNG not to proceed with signing the treaty”.

“China does not want to see a thickening of the latticework of such alliances in the Indo-Pacific, as such a latticework will make it harder for China to use force to achieve its territorial and other strategic objectives,” Mr Pezzullo said.

The sidelining of the treaty came as Australia’s ambassador to the US, Kevin Rudd, declared China the “principal driving factor in the pan-regional disruption that we are facing” in the Indo-Pacific.

“If we look purely through the military lens, the fact that China’s defence expenditure continues to grow and grow and grow, and outpace in growth terms those military outlays of other countries across the region, is of itself deeply significant,” Dr Rudd said.

Responding to the events in Port Moresby, Chinese foreign ministry spokesman Lin Jian declared Canberra’s relationships with Pacific Island states should not “target third countries”.

The rebuke followed a warning in the state-run China Daily that Australia’s “two-faced policy towards China” was unsustainable, amid growing frustration in Beijing at the Albanese government’s moves to court closer Chinese ties while deepening security ties with the US and other partners.

Senior figures in PNG including former defence chief Jerry Singirok and opposition leader Douglas Tomuriesa have warned the proposed treaty with Australia agreement threatens the country’s sovereignty and could be unconstitutional.

However, Mr Marape said there was “no sticking point” that would prevent him getting the agreement across the line.

“We’re not running a military dictatorship here,” Mr Marape said. “It’s a democracy. So, you’ve got to allow the process, (the) new process to complete its course.”

A copy of the treaty, obtained by The Australian, reveals it would ­commit Port Moresby to an ­alliance on par with the one Australia has with the US, requiring both countries to “act to meet the common danger” if either came under attack.

Mr Albanese said the text had been agreed by both sides and would be signed at an upcoming ministerial forum in Australia.

“We respect sovereignty and we respect the processes of the Papua New Guinea government,” Mr Albanese said. “What this is about is the processes of their cabinet, that we respect.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122268

File: bcdd793f79df50e⋯.jpg (187.65 KB,1439x810,1439:810,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23617370 (180941ZSEP25) Notable: COMMENTARY: Albanese’s horror week as the Pacific’s twice-jilted bride - “Like a twice-jilted bride, Anthony Albanese has had a horror week. He turned up first to Vanuatu to sign the Nakamal security agreement and then to Papua New Guinea to sign the Pukpuk Defence Treaty, only to have both fall over… In the Pacific battle for influence, the Prime Minister’s failure to get either over the line… is a humiliating blow, even if it is unlikely to spell the end of either deal. It is tempting to blame Beijing… Doing so overlooks the messy internal coalition politics of Melanesian nations, and underplays their reticence to put all diplomatic eggs in one basket. Yet the Pukpuk pact asks a great deal of PNG, which for half a century has pursued a ‘friend to all, enemy of none’ policy… Australia has learned the hard way that Pacific nations cannot be rushed.” – Amanda Hodge, The Australian

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122199

>>122243

>>122246

>>122259

>>122267

COMMENTARY: Albanese’s horror week as the Pacific’s twice-jilted bride

AMANDA HODGE - 17 September 2025

1/2

Like a twice-jilted bride, Anthony Albanese has had a horror week.

He turned up first to Vanuatu to sign the Nakamal security agreement and then to Papua New Guinea to sign the Pukpuk Defence Treaty, only to have both fall over.

In the Pacific battle for influence, the Prime Minister’s failure to get either over the line – despite reassurances from his counterparts – is a humiliating blow, even if it is unlikely to spell the end of either deal.

It is tempting to blame Beijing, which will undoubtedly have lobbied hard against the agreements, for the government’s failure to finalise two pacts that would have lent real shape to Australia’s plans for a hub and spoke security network with our closest neighbours. Doing so overlooks the complex, often messy internal coalition politics of Melanesian nations, and underplays the reticence across the region to put all their diplomatic eggs in one basket.

Why would they, just as the competition for influence has delivered unprecedented leverage and benefits for a region that has felt perennially overlooked and taken for granted?

Australia clearly hoped that packing both security deals with sweeteners – $500m over several years for Vanuatu, billions of dollars in military modernisation for PNG as well as citizenship pathways for military personnel – would be enough to compensate them for taking sides.

But not everyone in Vanuatu Prime Minister Jotham Napat’s cabinet, or that of PNG leader James Marape, was ready for that level of mutual commitment with Australia.

China may have helped amplify reservations, but these are non-aligned, independent nations. The concerns are genuine. Were Pacific nations forced to choose, most would opt for Australia’s security umbrella over China. That is particularly so for PNG, which enjoys the closest relationship with Canberra and has expressed a strong preference for Australia as a security partner. It was the Marape government, after all, that pursued this defence treaty with Canberra.

And it was Prime Minister Marape who chose this week’s 50th independence celebrations as the backdrop for signing the landmark pact with Albanese that would commit both nations to mutual defence and closer military integration.

Yet the PukPuk pact asks a great deal of PNG, which for half a century has pursued a “friend to all, enemy of none” foreign policy.

Lowy Institute Pacific Island program director Mihai Sora says Marape may have been “misled by members of his cabinet with the intended effect to make him look foolish”.

Certainly, the PNG leader has lost as much face as Albanese by failing to sign the treaty.

“We know from first principles that people are highly biddable; that there would be a mix of sentiment-driven reluctance to sign up and a mix of personal gain involved in some people taking one side over the other,” says Sora. “Derailing the deal at the last minute has inflicted maximum damage on Marape.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122269

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23617381 (180951ZSEP25) Notable: Video: New details emerge of assault allegations against Alan Jones - Former broadcaster Alan Jones, 84, now faces 27 charges of indecent assault and sexual touching after updated court documents revealed further details of alleged incidents at public venues and private residences across NSW. Nine complainants remain, down from 11, with accusations including groping, kissing, and sexual contact at locations such as the Sydney Opera House, Gunners Barracks restaurant, lifts at his home and workplace, and his Fitzroy Falls farm. Jones’ lawyer, Bryan Wrench, attacked the Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions for what he called a “backflip” in shifting the case from a jury trial to a local court hearing, expected to run months. Strike Force Bonnefin continues to oversee the investigation. Jones denies all charges.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122252

New details emerge of assault allegations against Alan Jones

Clare Sibthorpe - September 18, 2025

1/2

Alan Jones has been accused of indecently touching nine alleged victims at public locations such as the Opera House and a lower north shore restaurant, as well as inside lifts at the 84-year-old’s former workplace and his homes throughout Sydney and NSW.

The newly emerged details relate to alleged victims the former broadcaster was already charged over, but provide further information about the exact places and circumstances of the accusations.

The details of the allegations were outlined in updated court documents tendered in Jones’ indecent assault and sexual touching case, as it was revealed the matter will not be heard before a jury and two complainants will no longer be involved in the case.

On Thursday, John Maddison Tower Local Court also heard some charges against Jones had been downgraded or amended, with the factor of aggravation removed from several counts.

Strike Force Bonnefin was established to investigate the former teacher and Wallabies coach following a major investigation by The Sydney Morning Herald and The Age.

Jones was initially charged with dozens of offences and now faces 27 counts, as the number of complainants dropped from 11 to nine. He faces 25 counts of indecent assault and two counts of sexual touching. It comes days after nine charges were added.

His high-profile lawyer, Bryan Wrench, told the court that the Office of the Director of Public Prosecution’s (ODPP) decision to pursue the case in the local court was a “backflip” made with two days’ notice.

Wrench said Jones had been “ready from day dot” to present his case to the jury.

Jones was excused from attending as his matter was briefly heard and did not appear at court.

Earlier court documents seen by this masthead showed the allegations of indecent assault at that time included fondling penises, stroking thighs and squeezing bottoms. He was also accused of pulling a man’s scrotum and masturbating during one alleged indecent assault.

Jones was accused of committing the crimes at his former Newtown home, his harbourside apartment, his farm at Fitzroy Falls in the Southern Highlands, Tamworth in northern NSW and other Sydney spots.

However, on Thursday, further details emerged about the allegations against Jones in updated court attendance notices.

These documents allege that in 2008 Jones assaulted a man three times at a Kiama restaurant, including having “stroked” him “on the front and back of his thigh on the outside of his clothing”, “patted” him “on the bottom on the outside of his clothing” and “pushed his body against the back of the complainant’s body, touching [his] penis on the outside of their clothing and pulling their penis”.

Also in 2008, Jones allegedly assaulted another man twice while being driven home from work, kissed him in the lift of his Sydney home three times and twice in the lift of his workplace, and touched his penis on the outside of his clothing at Gunners Barracks restaurant in Mosman.

In 2012, Jones allegedly assaulted another complainant at a Sydney function, touching and squeezing their bottom outside their clothing. Police say Jones “touched and grabbed” another man’s bottom at a Tamworth event in late 2013.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122270

File: 8886b358f55a056⋯.jpg (418.74 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23617395 (181001ZSEP25) Notable: Brittany Higgins’ last-minute appeal against Linda Reynolds defamation award - Brittany Higgins has lodged an appeal in the WA Supreme Court against the ruling that she defamed former Liberal minister Linda Reynolds, in a bid to overturn $340,000 damages and legal costs potentially reaching $2m. The filing came on the final legal day for appeal and coincided with Higgins accepting service of a bankruptcy notice from Reynolds, whose proceedings sought access to a protective trust linked to Higgins’ $2.4m government compensation payout. The appeal delays bankruptcy action. Reynolds, awarded $315,000 in damages after Justice Tottle found Higgins made “objectively untrue and misleading” statements and defamatory social media posts, is also pursuing damages from Higgins’ husband David Sharaz.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122229

>>122230

>>122231

>>122232

Brittany Higgins’ last-minute appeal against Linda Reynolds defamation award

STEPHEN RICE - 17 September 2025

Brittany Higgins has lodged a last-minute appeal against the finding that she defamed former Liberal minister Linda Reynolds, as she attempts to ward off a $340,000 damages award and legal costs that could reach $2m.

Ms Higgins filed the appeal in the West Australian Supreme Court on Wednesday, the last day she was legally able to do so, and coincidentally, the same day she accepted service, through her lawyers, of the bankruptcy notice Ms Reynolds had been ­attempting to serve on her.

The appeal will delay any bankruptcy proceedings, and any hope that Ms Reynolds had that she might quickly recover any of the damages or massive costs she has incurred.

The former senator had filed bankruptcy proceedings against Ms Higgins in a bid to gain access to a “protective trust” that holds whatever remains of the $2.4m her former staffer received in her compensation payout from the Albanese government.

The grounds for Ms Higgins’ appeal were not specified in the notice lodged with the court.

Her husband David Sharaz is expected to be hit in ­coming days with a six-figure damages and costs award from the defamation case, despite his attempt to bow out of the proceedings.

Ms Reynolds had separately filed defamation action against Mr Sharaz over tweets he published on social media, including one in which he wrote that “there is a very real chance (Ms Reynolds) will be called to court this year to answer questions on her involvement in Brittany Higgins feeling pressured by her office not to continue with a complaint to police”.

Justice Tottle found that the tweet “conveyed the imputations (Ms Reynolds) pressured (Ms Higgins) not to proceed with a genuine complaint of sexual assault to police and she is a hypocrite in her advocacy for gender equality and female empowerment”.

Ms Reynolds was awarded $135,000 over the post, in which Justice Tottle found Ms Higgins had participated. He found Ms Higgins had made numerous ­“objectively untrue and misleading” statements when she first went public with allegations that she was raped by a colleague – now known to be Bruce Lehrmann – ­inside Ms Reynolds’ Parliament House office.

The judge also found Ms Higgins had defamed Ms Reynolds in a social media post that carried the imputation that the senator had engaged in a campaign of harass­ment, had mishandled Ms Higgins’ rape allegation, and had engaged in questionable conduct during the trial. He awarded Ms Reynolds $180,000 in damages on that issue.

Justice Tottle made damning findings about Ms Higgins’ claim that there had been a political cover-up of the rape allegations, noting that it was a vital part of Ms Higgins’ story but that it had not occurred.

Justice Tottle ruled Ms Higgins should pay 80 per cent of Ms Reynolds’ bills and that an early settlement offer – tabled four days before the trial was scheduled to begin – could not be considered reasonable.

The offer included a “mutual statement of regret” that would have led to Ms Reynolds acknowledging Ms Higgins believed she was not given appropriate support after being raped in Parliament House.

Justice Tottle found that the mutual statement “fell short of an apology by a substantial margin”.

“The plaintiff’s characterisation of it as a statement to the effect the parties have agreed to disagree is accurate,” he wrote.

“As appears to have been the defendant’s intention, the mutual statement would have conveyed the defendant maintained the truth of the defamatory statements made by her.”

While total legal costs incurred by Ms Reynolds in bringing the defamation action are unknown, she said publicly in the wake of last month’s win that she had spent “millions” on the matter and had mortgaged her house to pay legal bills.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/brittany-higgins-lastminute-appeal-against-linda-reynolds-defamation-award/news-story/a4f71eeb21f95b51dd797fe64a5a9bdf

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122271

File: 5fffd3a7a1ea9ee⋯.jpg (614.12 KB,1920x1080,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23622705 (191120ZSEP25) Notable: Albanese-Trump meeting looks shaky as PM prepares to depart – Anthony Albanese faces the prospect of returning from the US without a confirmed one-on-one meeting with Donald Trump, a scenario analysts say would be unprecedented and risky for the alliance. At best, the two leaders may only share a brief “pull-aside” during a New York reception, with no expectation of a White House meeting or joint press conference. The uncertainty follows Albanese’s setbacks in Vanuatu and Papua New Guinea, where planned security pacts fell through. Former ambassador Arthur Sinodinos stressed clarity is needed from Trump on the AUKUS submarine pact, currently under Pentagon review. Despite four phone calls, observers warn the relationship feels “thin” and requires urgent strengthening as Trump reshapes US policy in the Pacific.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109241 (pb)

>>122175

>>122253

Albanese-Trump meeting looks shaky as PM prepares to depart

Matthew Knott - September 19, 2025

1/2

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese is preparing for the possibility of returning from five nights in the United States without securing a one-on-one meeting with President Donald Trump, a development that would raise alarm about the state of the US-Australia alliance.

As Albanese readies to depart for the United Nations General Assembly in New York, a meeting with Trump has yet to be locked in and is far from guaranteed.

If Albanese and Trump meet in New York, it is likely to be a brief encounter, possibly an informal “pull-aside” conversation on the sidelines of a reception Trump is hosting on Tuesday night (local time).

There is no expectation of a formal meeting at the White House or a joint press conference with both leaders.

Failing to secure a meeting with Trump would be another blow to Albanese on foreign policy, after he was unable to finalise security agreements during visits to Vanuatu and Papua New Guinea.

Albanese has projected calm about any possible meeting with Trump, pointing out the pair would also have a chance to meet at multilateral summits in Malaysia and South Korea at the end of October.

Foreign affairs experts counter that too much time has already passed without a leaders’ meeting and that it is crucial to ensure the US-Australia relationship remains strong.

There is growing discussion in foreign policy circles about whether Albanese should have moved more quickly to establish a personal relationship with Trump by making efforts to meet when he was a presidential candidate or president-elect.

British Prime Minister Keir Starmer, who had a two-hour meeting with Trump in New York in September last year during the US presidential election campaign, has forged close ties with Trump despite coming from different sides of the political spectrum. Trump has hosted Starmer at the White House, and Starmer this week hosted Trump for a state visit to the United Kingdom.

Arthur Sinodinos, who served as Australia’s ambassador to Washington during Trump’s first term, said: “It is important for the two leaders to meet as soon as possible: they are the ultimate decision-makers.

“It would be especially good to have clarity from the president on where he stands on AUKUS given it is being reviewed by the Pentagon.”

Senior Pentagon official Elbridge Colby is conducting a review of the AUKUS nuclear-powered submarine pact, and Australian officials have been hoping to hear an explicit endorsement of the deal from Trump.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122272

File: 2baf801b4fba107⋯.jpg (1.75 MB,3877x2589,3877:2589,Clipboard.jpg)

File: e18f0550d562fb3⋯.jpg (191.12 KB,895x465,179:93,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23622811 (191232ZSEP25) Notable: Video: Papua New Guinea may sit out potential conflict between Australia and China despite Pukpuk defence treaty – Papua New Guinea Prime Minister James Marape says there is a “high possibility” his country would not join a conflict involving Australia and China, despite the new Pukpuk mutual defence treaty. He told the ABC’s 7.30 that while the treaty commits both nations to “act to meet the common danger,” each retains sovereign decision-making. “We don’t expect Australia to drop everything and run to us,” Marape said, adding PNG would urge “peace, not war.” He ruled out Australian bases in PNG and said the treaty does not apply to potential border conflicts with Indonesia.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122243

>>122246

>>122259

>>122267

China urges Papua New Guinea not to exclude other countries after it signed 'Pukpuk' communique with Australia

Marian Faa - 19 September 2025

China has urged Papua New Guinea not to sign any deal that might exclude or restrict third parties from cooperating with the Pacific nation, as Australia scrambles to clinch a landmark defence treaty.

In a social media post, the Chinese embassy in PNG advised the country not to compromise its independence, urging PNG to "properly handle issues bearing on its sovereignty and long-term interests".

China is one of PNG's most important trade and economic partners, with defence experts in the island nation raising concerns the high-level pact with Australia could put strain on the country's relationship with Beijing.

The post is the most pointed public response from China to the treaty since the ABC revealed details about the pact this week.

If signed, the Pukpuk Treaty, as it is known, would see Australia and PNG become formal military allies and commit to defending each other in the event of a military attack.

It also promises that any activities either country undertakes with third parties shall not compromise the purposes of the treaty.

The document was expected to be signed on Wednesday, but it failed to get over the line, with Australia and PNG resorting to signing a communique in lieu of the actual document.

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese told journalists the deal wasn't signed this week because PNG's national cabinet couldn't reach quorum when it met on Monday to pass the treaty, because ministers were out of town for independence celebrations.

Leaders said they expected the final document to be inked in the coming weeks.

In its social media post, the Chinese embassy said it respected PNG's right to conclude a bilateral treaty with other countries, but added that such a deal should not be exclusive in nature.

"Nor should it restrict or prevents [sic] a sovereign country from cooperating with a third party for any reason. It should also refrain from targeting any third party or undermining its legitimate rights and interests," the post read.

This week, PNG Prime Minister James Marape indicated the country's defence minister, Billy Joseph, would hold discussions with China and its direct neighbour, Indonesia, regarding the proposed treaty's parameters.

The ABC has reached out to the Indonesian government for a response, but its Ministry of Foreign Affairs declined to comment.

Michael Kabuni, a Papua New Guinean political science scholar at the Australian National University, has also questioned how the treaty serves PNG, in a blog post published by ANU's Development Policy Centre.

It said PNG had more pressing priorities than increasing the combat readiness of armed forces and possibly committing them to combat outside the country.

"What PNG needs are coastguard-style capabilities: maritime patrols, satellite monitoring, fisheries enforcement, customs and border policing, engineering units and disaster response teams," Mr Kabuni wrote.

"Similar investments are required for land-border control, while tribal conflict and criminality are best addressed by expanding and equipping the police and procuring the latest technology."

It also warned that additional investment in defence forces could help to destabilise the country, pointing to Fiji as an example where " a disproportionately resourced military can become a political threat".

The piece also highlighted concerns that social obligations to tribes or clans could lead to weapons meant for the army ending up in "tribal conflicts, leading to violence that could escalate beyond the state's control".

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-09-19/china-warns-papua-new-guinea-against-bilateral-deal-australia/105794018

https://www.facebook.com/ChineseEmbPNG/posts/1128250189483600

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122273

File: 673bb845d3ef992⋯.jpg (410.04 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23622838 (191242ZSEP25) Notable: David Sharaz to pay damages to Linda Reynolds over social media posts – Brittany Higgins’ husband, David Sharaz, has been ordered to pay Linda Reynolds $92,000 in damages plus an estimated $500,000 in legal costs after being found to have defamed the former Liberal minister in a series of social media posts. He is also jointly liable with Higgins for $135,000 already awarded against her, bringing his total liability to $242,471. Justice Paul Tottle ruled Sharaz’s posts carried “intimidatory overtones” and aggravated damages were applied. The judge found allegations of a political “cover-up” had no basis in fact and said Sharaz’s failure to apologise or settle was unreasonable.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122229

>>122230

>>122232

>>122270

David Sharaz to pay damages to Linda Reynolds over social media posts

STEPHEN RICE - 19 September 2025

Brittany Higgins’s husband, David Sharaz, has been ordered to pay Linda Reynolds $92,000 in damages, plus legal costs that may amount to a further $500,000, after he was found to have defamed the former Liberal minister in a series of social media posts.

Mr Sharaz had tried to bow out of the proceedings in the West Australian Supreme Court last year but on Thursday judge Paul Tottle rejected his submissions that he should not have to pay substantial damages. He is also liable jointly with Ms Higgins to pay $135,000 in damages already awarded against her, because of his participation in the same post, bringing the total amount for which he is liable to $242,471.

The judge found that the “cover-up” allegations made by Ms Higgins that underscored Mr Sharaz’s posts had no basis in fact and awarded indemnity costs – a higher than usual amount – against him.

The judgment comes a day after Ms Higgins lodged an 11th hour appeal with the court against the $340,000 damages and costs of more than $1m that Justice Tottle awarded after finding she had defamed Ms Reynolds in social media posts.

The appeal will delay bankruptcy proceedings that Ms Rey­nolds had begun against Ms Higgins in a bid to gain access to a “protective trust” that holds whatever remains of the $2.4m her former staffer received in compen­sation payout from the Albanese government. However, it would not stop Ms Reynolds pursuing Mr Sharaz in bankruptcy if he fails to pay the money owed.

One tweet and Instagram post by Mr Sharaz on April 1, 2022, read: “I’m aghast that despite everything you put a staffer through you’re still a minister.”

That was entirely gratuitous, Justice Tottle found, and it was entirely understandable for Ms Reynolds to feel “a bit creeped out” by Mr Sharaz’s statement: “Linda, I see you.”

“It was a statement calculated to create a sense of unease and anxiety on the part of (Ms Rey­nolds). It is a statement with intimidatory overtones,” he found.

He awarded Ms Reynolds aggravated damages of $30,000.

In a December 3, 2022, Facebook post, Mr Sharaz responded to another comment that had suggested Ms Reynolds was “a monster who deserves to be in jail”. He commented: “Thanks for reminding her. I hope she hears this every day until she dies.”

The harm caused by the comment lay in the distress it caused to Ms Reynolds, the judge found, noting the former senator’s evidence that “the comment made her feel sick again and she referred to its ‘stalky nature’. This combined with the abusive and vindictive nature of the post aggravate the circumstance of publication.”

Justice Tottle awarded aggravated damages of $20,000 for the post. Another tweet inferred that Ms Reynolds had interfered with the criminal trial against Bruce Lehrmann.

Justice Tottle awarded Ms Reynolds $35,000.

The judge noted that Mr Sharaz had made no offer to settle the case, saying this was unreasonable.

“Each of the defamatory publications made by him involved a variation on the theme that (Ms Reynolds) pressured or bullied (or … ‘destroyed’) Ms Higgins as part of the cover-up alleged by Ms Higgins,” Justice Tottle said.

“The cover-up allegation had no basis in fact.

“The defamatory publications were indefensible.

“A settlement offer should have been made.

‘At the very least, an offer to make an apology should have been made.”

Mr Sharaz would therefore have to pay Ms Reynolds’s legal costs on an indemnity basis, a much higher proportion of ­actual cost than normally awarded.

In this case, it is understood those costs are likely to be around $500,000.

Justice Tottle ruled Ms Higgins should pay 80 per cent of Ms Reynolds’s bills and that an early settlement offer – tabled four days before the trial was scheduled to begin – could not be considered reasonable.

The offer included a “mutual statement of regret” that would have led to Ms Reynolds acknowledging Ms Higgins believed she was not given appropriate support after being raped in Parliament House.

Justice Tottle found that the mutual statement “fell short of an apology by a substantial margin”.

“The plaintiff’s characteris­ation of it as a statement to the ­effect the parties have agreed to disagree is accurate,” he wrote.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/david-sharaz-to-pay-damages-to-linda-reynolds-over-social-media-posts/news-story/fdedf4ebbfb378d368ecb52f499687b3

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122274

File: 61a96c6293f51f2⋯.jpg (274.83 KB,2000x1125,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: fc219039da36145⋯.jpg (430.75 KB,2048x1536,4:3,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23627145 (200833ZSEP25) Notable: China’s warning to Australian delegation over ‘two-faced’ policy in ‘security-focused’ Beijing talks – At the Australia-China High Level Dialogue in Beijing, senior Chinese figures warned a visiting Australian delegation that Canberra’s “two-faced policy” of deepening security ties with the US and Japan while maintaining heavy trade with China “is not sustainable”. The meeting, led by Craig Emerson and Warwick Smith, was described as “robust” and “less friendly”, with disputes over Taiwan and the South China Sea dominating closed-door sessions. Chinese delegates cast Australia’s actions as “provocative”, while Australian officials including ambassador Scott Dewar defended Canberra’s stance. Analysts said Beijing appeared more confident, but Australia viewed itself as having weathered China’s trade coercion intact.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122162

>>122244

>>122246

>>122263

China’s warning to Australian delegation over ‘two-faced’ policy in ‘security-focused’ Beijing talks

WILL GLASGOW - 20 September 2025

1/2

Days before Anthony Albanese was due to meet Donald Trump in New York, several current and former senior Chinese officials made it known to a high-level Australian delegation visiting Beijing that they are not happy about Canberra’s China policy.

“It was more security focused. It was quite robust. It seemed less friendly,” one Australian delegate told me about their experience this week in Beijing.

On Wednesday, an Australian delegation led by former trade minister Craig Emerson and former Howard government minister Warwick Smith arrived at Beijing’s Great Hall of the People to meet a senior representative of China’s central government.

The expectation among many of the Australians was that they were to have an audience with Foreign Minister Wang Yi. Wang, Xi Jinping’s top international affairs adviser, had met Emerson and his fellow delegates at the “Australia-China High Level Dialogue” when it last met in Beijing in 2023.

Back then, a huge fuss was made about Wang’s almost hour-long audience with the Australian representatives in an ornate room in the Great Hall of the People. I remember it well – I was one of the Australian delegates that year. His presence, we were told, was a signal that Beijing was warming up ties with Canberra.

This Wednesday there was no Wang. He had a good excuse. He was in Seoul meeting with his South Korean counterpart.

In his place was Tie Ning, a novelist who now serves as vice-chair of the standing committee of China’s National People’s Congress, China’s parliament with Communist Party characteristics. Her title has some weight in the Chinese system, but she has nothing like the clout of Wang.

With all due respect to Australia’s Senate president, it would be like going to meet Foreign Minister Penny Wong and instead being slotted into Sue Lines’s diary.

Was this payback for the pointed absence of Australia’s ambassador to China from Xi’s gargantuan military parade earlier in the month? Australian officials insisted it wasn’t, making much of Tie’s official ranking. The obvious alternative, Vice-Foreign Minister Ma Zhaoxu, was also said to be out of China.

While the status of the welcome party was ambiguous, the tone-setting editorial in the day’s China Daily was crystal clear: two years on, Beijing has grown frustrated with what it now openly describes as the Albanese government’s “two-faced policy towards China”.

The masthead complained about the Australian government’s continued efforts to shore up its defence ties with America and Japan while continuing to export far more to China than any other country.

“Canberra cannot butter bread on both sides,” the state-owned masthead complained.

“(Australia’s) two-faced policy towards China is not sustainable in the long run.”

How representative was that editorial of Beijing’s views? Well, one of China’s delegates at the “high-level dialogue” was Ji Tao, a member of the China Daily editorial board.

The “high-level dialogue” is called a “1.5 track” meeting in diplomatic jargon. In plain English, it is a meeting held behind closed doors that includes a mixture of serving government officials, retired politicians and people from outside the government, variously in business, industry groups, academia, think tanks and media roles.

It is the peak of its kind in the Australia-China relationship, so the annual meeting is a useful barometer of the state of things. As a delegate at the 2023 meeting, I had to bite my tongue about what happened inside the room. Happily, the “no reporting” rules don’t apply to me this year.

The big day of discussion took place on Thursday at Beijing’s Diaoyutai State Guesthouse. Things began warmly in the opening remarks, made before the assembled media.

Li Zhaoxing, head of the Chinese delegation and honorary president of the Chinese People’s Institute of Foreign Affairs, said the two countries should view each other as “partners”, ensure co-operation remained “the mainstay of the relationship”, and manage differences appropriately.

“Direct engagement between Australia and China is fundamental to a constructive relationship,” said Emerson, who had again been chosen by the PM to lead the Australian delegation.

“It enables opportunities to be harnessed and differences to be addressed and managed,” added the former Rudd-Gillard-era minister, who also noted the complementarity between the Australian and Chinese economies in his public remarks.

Then the doors closed and journalists were moved on for the private discussion. Multiple people familiar with the discussion have told me it was not long before “robust” exchanges began.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122275

File: 6337fa67f16aa09⋯.jpg (225.04 KB,1600x900,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 199855daa01cb26⋯.jpg (197.02 KB,1600x900,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 96a496141c7567e⋯.jpg (110.53 KB,1280x721,1280:721,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23627559 (201237ZSEP25) Notable: Jacinta Allan’s cultural revolution tries to escape the shadow of Dan’s China deals – On her first official trip to China, Victorian Premier Jacinta Allan emphasised cultural and people-to-people links, branding prominent Chinese-born and Chinese-background Victorians as “navigators” of a softer China strategy. She launched a tourism campaign with actor Wu Chun, who studied in Melbourne, and announced new Suburban Rail Loop tunnel boring machines from China, but sidestepped questions about activist Kevin Yam and journalist Cheng Lei. Analysts warned her emphasis on empathy risks appearing “fawning” without extracting concrete benefits. Allan’s approach contrasted with Daniel Andrews’ transactional Belt and Road diplomacy, though critics suggested her outreach also plays to Chinese-Australian voters back home.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122162

>>122244

>>122263

>>122274

Jacinta Allan’s cultural revolution tries to escape the shadow of Dan’s China deals

ANTHONY GALLOWAY - 19 September 2025

1/2

Inside a grand room at the luxury Waldorf Astoria hotel overlooking the Huangpu River in Shanghai, Jacinta Allan held court with influencer Wu Chun, a figure described by locals as the “Chinese backstreet boy”.

The youthful-looking 45-year-old actor and singer, who commands a following of 12.8 million on Weibo, confided in the Victorian Premier that he planned to return to Melbourne so that his children could have the same ­experience he had studying at RMIT more than two decades ago.

During her five-day trip to China, Allan has repeatedly ­referred to Chinese people who live in, or have connections to, Victoria as “navigators” of her new China strategy.

She announced on Wednesday night that the Bruneian-born Wu would join their ranks as the face of a new tourism campaign aimed at doubling the number of Chinese visitors to the state within four years.

The next morning, The Australian asked Allan at a press conference whether the previously imprisoned television presenter Cheng Lei and Hong Kong activist Kevin Yam, both of whom live in Melbourne, were also “navigators” of the relationship.

Allan’s response was a swift political sidestep: it was “a question more appropriately put to the federal government”.

The treatment of Cheng and Yam, and many others in Melbourne who have complained about being harassed by the Chinese state, may fall within the purview of the commonwealth.

But so do other issues Allan has been keen to discuss this week, such as her push for more inter­national students in the face of a commonwealth cap.

Allan’s response encapsulated the core paradox at the heart of her China plan.

She has been at pains to point out that her new strategy is about the shared culture and people-to-people links, as opposed to the transactionalism that underpinned her predecessor Dan Andrews’s 2016 strategy which set the state up for a deal with Beijing under the Belt and Road Initiative.

But Allan is up against the ­notoriously transactional system of the Chinese government, which deals with its counterparts based on the iron laws of their relative power. By making her strategy less about cold, hard cash and more about cultural links, Allan runs the risk of appearing to fawn over ­Beijing for five days without ­extracting much at all.

Crime vs education

Melbourne-based China expert John Fitzgerald says there were ­always going to be many limits to what Allan could extract from China.

While there are opportunities to boost imports of finished products from China and agricultural exports to the country, he said lifting Chinese investment in Victoria would be difficult, given Beijing is focusing on domestic and “Global South” initiatives. And on her aim to lift the number of Chinese ­students by the thousands, Fitzgerald says Allan should be ­focusing more on fixing Victoria’s crime crisis.

“Victoria has quality providers, but the state’s falling reputation for personal safety and security of property is under close, critical scrutiny in Chinese-language media, much as it is in mainstream media,” he says.

“Any Victorian government planning to sell Victoria as the education state will have to deal first with its growing reputation as the crime state. The answer to that lies at home, not touring China.”

Dan problem

With Andrews now running his own company helping Australian businesses gain access to the Chinese market, Allan’s emphasis on the cultural connection was a necessary distinction to make.

It also genuinely fits with the persona of Allan, who presents as a warmer, more empathetic – and less transactional – politician than Andrews.

The appearance of Andrews at a controversial military parade in Beijing two weeks ago complicated Allan’s trip, which was locked in months ago.

With Allan scheduled to jet out of Chengdu on Friday night, it was still unclear whether Andrews ­remained in China or had also ­returned to Melbourne.

Allan maintains she does not know whether the former premier was in the country at the same time as her, and has denied he helped set up any of her meetings.

Whatever her private views are on China’s direction under Xi Jinping, it’s difficult to see the Ben­digo-based Allan, upon retiring from politics, standing alongside the world’s dictators and endorsing the country’s military might.

Some close to her say she couldn’t think of anything worse.

And Allan’s first official trip to China – accompanied by a travelling media pack from the state press gallery – was also starkly different to Andrews’ seventh and last visit as premier, which was ­effectively done in secret.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122276

File: 4cb4cbfa946095d⋯.jpg (218.16 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: a5b082c7053896c⋯.jpg (235.49 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23627589 (201250ZSEP25) Notable: Climate, Palestine, investment on agenda as Albanese goes global – Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has embarked on a three-nation tour to pitch Australia as a clean-energy powerhouse, promote his government’s social media reforms, and formally recognise Palestinian statehood. In New York, he will attend the UN General Assembly, join a France-Saudi conference on a two-state solution, and court global investors to back his $368bn AUKUS submarine pact and Future Made in Australia agenda. A meeting with Donald Trump remains uncertain, but Albanese will press for tariff exemptions and US backing. Stops in London and the UAE will cover trade, security, and climate diplomacy.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109241 (pb)

>>109520 (pb)

>>122175

>>122253

>>122271

Climate, Palestine, investment on agenda as Albanese goes global

GEOFF CHAMBERS - 19 September 2025

1/2

Anthony Albanese will use one of his longest overseas trips to charm global investors and lure funding for Labor’s renewable energy rollout and Future Made in Australia plan, as he prepares to formally recognise Palestinian statehood and meet Donald Trump for the first time.

The Prime Minister on Saturday will fly to the US for his first United Nations General Assembly leaders’ week, where he will discuss trade, investment, security, climate change and social media risks with counterparts, before travelling to Britain and the ­United Arab Emirates.

While no bilateral meeting with Mr Trump has been locked in, Mr Albanese is expected to at least shake hands and have a quick chat with the Republican billionaire during the UN leaders’ meeting or a reception hosted by the US President in New York on Tuesday.

Mr Trump, who cancelled a meeting with Mr Albanese on the sidelines of the G7 summit in June to co-ordinate strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities, this week said the Prime Minister was travelling to the US “to see me very soon”.

Mr Albanese, who earlier this month spoke for the fourth time on the phone with Mr Trump, is keen to lock in US support for the $368bn AUKUS nuclear submarine defence pact and discuss the potential of tariff exemptions. If the pair don’t have a formal meeting, Mr Albanese would likely have to wait until the East Asia and APEC summits in Malaysia and South Korea next month.

Mr Albanese will attend the two-state solution conference hosted by France and Saudi Arabia in New York, which is being used as a platform by Australia, Britain, Canada and others to progress Palestinian statehood and put guardrails around reform commitments made by Palestinian Authority president Mahmoud Abbas. After having his visa denied by US officials, Mr Abbas will speak with world leaders via video link.

Each country is expected to make separate declarations recognising Palestine, which will outline timelines and conditions.

Mr Albanese, who will be joined in New York by ministers including Penny Wong and Chris Bowen, is focused on amplifying Australia’s climate change credentials after unveiling an ambitious 2035 target to reduce emissions by between 62-70 per cent on 2005 levels.

The target will be used to spruik Australia’s bid to host next year’s UN COP31 climate change conference.

The three-country blitz by Mr Albanese will focus heavily on wooing cashed-up global investors to pour funds into Australian ­renewables and manufacturing by positioning the nation as a clean energy powerhouse.

Despite Mr Trump pushing back against nations targeting US tech giants, Mr Albanese will promote his government’s world-leading social media ban for children aged under 16.

During the General Assembly week, Mr Albanese will host a social media event and discuss Australia’s actions with other leaders.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122277

File: 460ba4ba1aef0af⋯.jpg (159.73 KB,1280x720,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 7e2f33a6119012d⋯.jpg (532.72 KB,1275x1650,17:22,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 23df02e4381d8ae⋯.jpg (371.75 KB,1275x1650,17:22,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 5e2b334384f25f2⋯.jpg (279.48 KB,1275x1650,17:22,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 06a3c8186d85f3b⋯.jpg (163.76 KB,1275x1650,17:22,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23630413 (210057ZSEP25) Notable: ‘Reckless’: Republicans threaten Australia with ‘punitive measures’ over Palestine recognition – Senior Republicans, including Ted Cruz and Elise Stefanik, warned Anthony Albanese that recognising Palestinian statehood would reward Hamas and fuel anti-Semitism. In an open letter also sent to UK, France, and Canada, they said the “reckless policy” undermined US interests and could invite “punitive measures” against Australia. Speaker Mike Johnson called recognition before hostage returns “baffling and deeply troubling”. The warning coincides with Albanese’s arrival in New York for the United Nations General Assembly (UNGA), the annual gathering of world leaders, where he will back Palestinian statehood, seek climate diplomacy wins, and attempt to secure AUKUS support if a meeting with Donald Trump goes ahead.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109520 (pb)

>>122175

>>122253

>>122271

>>122276

‘Reckless’: Republicans threaten Australia with ‘punitive measures’ over Palestine recognition

GEOFF CHAMBERS and LYDIA LYNCH - 20 September 2025

1/2

Senior Republicans and allies of Donald Trump have lashed Anthony Albanese’s impending recognition of Palestinian statehood, warning it could prompt “punitive measures” against Australia as the Prime Minister flew to the United States on Saturday.

In an open letter, 25 Republicans – including former GOP presidential candidate Ted Cruz and Trump loyalist Elsie Stefanik – urged Mr Albanese to abandon plans to legitimise a Palestinian state.

Warning that the “reckless policy” could trigger a further rise of anti-Semitism in Australia, the Republicans said the move “sets the dangerous precedent that violence, not diplomacy, is the most expedient means for terrorist groups like Hamas to achieve their political aims”.

“Hamas’s war crimes are clear, and its rejection of diplomacy should lead your countries to impose more pressure. Instead, you offer greater rewards,” they wrote.

Mr Albanese was due to land in New York Saturday night (Sunday morning AEST) where he will attend his first United Nations General Assembly leaders’ week and formally recognise Palestinian statehood.

The letter, also sent to the leaders of the UK, France and Canada, warned that recognition also “imperils the security of your own countries”.

“Proposed recognition is coinciding with sharp increases in anti-Semitic activity in each of your countries. Jews are facing unprecedented harassment and attacks against them are becoming a common occurrence.” the Republicans wrote.

“You have the responsibility to stand against this scourge, denounce violence, and protect Jewish communities. Sadly, your actions to legitimatize a Palestinian terror state will only provide greater motivation to the violent anti-Semitic mobs.

“Proceeding with recognition will put your country at odds with longstanding US policy and interests and may invite punitive measures in response.”

The letter, which was forwarded to Mr Trump and Secretary of state Marco Rubio, was signed by other Republicans close to the US President including Florida Senator Rick Scott, Arkansas’s Tom Cotton and Tennessee’s Bill Hagerty.

Republican Speaker Mike Johnson, who met Mr Albanese in 2023, was not a signatory but said: “It is baffling and deeply troubling to reward Hamas with statehood before they have returned every hostage. What message does that send to would-be terrorists and tyrants around the world? We cannot do that. President Trump and Republicans in Congress have been clear that rewarding the carnage that took place on October 7 is a non-starter”.

The release of the letter comes as Mr Albanese prepares to meet with Mr Trump for the first time this week, though there is no clarity on whether the pair will have a pull-aside meeting or a picture opportunity when they cross paths.

After disappointment on both sides when the first in-person meeting was cancelled at the G7 summit in June, neither Australian or American officials are front-running a meeting in New York.

Mr Trump has confirmed he will meet with Chinese President Xi Jinping on the sidelines of the APEC summit in South Korea late next month, which Mr Albanese will attend.

The Trump-Xi meeting is the first between the superpower leaders since the US President returned to the White House.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122278

File: 45aa1727c167867⋯.jpg (3.62 MB,3000x2000,3:2,Clipboard.jpg)

File: dad362c8f676e86⋯.jpg (1.63 MB,3000x2000,3:2,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23630550 (210134ZSEP25) Notable: ‘Gobsmackingly illogical’: Twiggy lashes Trump on climate as Aussies hit New York – Mining billionaire Andrew “Twiggy” Forrest has savaged Donald Trump’s energy policies as “gobsmackingly illogical”, accusing the president of pandering to oil and gas donors. Arriving in New York for UN leaders’ week alongside Prime Minister Anthony Albanese, Forrest attacked US threats of tariffs, visa bans and port levies against countries backing a global net zero shipping framework. He said America should focus on “the lowest cost, highest volume energy” instead of politicising oil and gas. Forrest’s Fortescue is backing a green shipping plan requiring low-carbon fuels, and he has launched a media blitz in New York while preparing to join Climate Week events with global leaders.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109464 (pb)

>>109401 (pb)

>>122253

>>122271

>>122276

‘Gobsmackingly illogical’: Twiggy lashes Trump on climate as Aussies hit New York

Michael Koziol - September 21, 2025

1/2

Washington: Australian mining billionaire Andrew “Twiggy” Forrest sharply criticised US President Donald Trump’s “gobsmackingly illogical” energy policies and accused him of kowtowing to oil and gas donors as he arrived in New York for a major United Nations summit.

Forrest and his Fortescue Metals Group support a net zero emissions regime for global shipping, which stands to be formally adopted next month by the International Maritime Organisation. It would introduce a carbon price and mandate use of green fuels in an industry responsible for 3 per cent of global emissions.

But the Trump administration is vehemently opposed to the framework, describing it as a “global carbon tax on Americans”, and has threatened to hit countries that support it with tariffs, visa restrictions and port levies.

Fortescue’s green ammonia-powered ship, the Green Pioneer, pulled into New York on Friday ahead of the UN summit, which will be attended by Trump, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and scores of other political and business leaders. Albanese and his fiancee, Jodie Haydon, arrived in New York on Saturday.

Forrest has also taken out full-page advertisements in The New York Times this coming week, along with digital newsstands and bus shelters across New York, calling on the US government to change its tune.

“The Gulf states obviously aren’t in love with the policy … going to green shipping impacts their bottom line. But I’m really surprised to see the US line up on that side,” Forrest told this masthead in an interview.

“[The Republicans] won an election on promoting oil and gas and saying global warming’s a hoax. There’s not a scientist in the world – and soon there won’t be many citizens in the world – who believe that.

“What they’re really saying is the oil and gas sector has paid the large majority of our election bills, and we’re going to stick with them.”

Trump came to power pledging to “drill, baby, drill” to dramatically expand American oil and gas production.

An August statement by US Secretary of State Marco Rubio, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, Transport Secretary Sean Duffy and Energy Secretary Chris Wright said the proposed shipping policy was pro-China and anti-American, and would push up costs for consumers and cruise passengers by fining ships that fail to meet “unattainable” fuel standards and emissions targets.

“These fuel standards would conveniently benefit China by requiring the use of expensive fuels unavailable at global scale,” they said.

Forrest said that position was “gobsmackingly illogical” and that he did not believe consumers would pay a price.

“My very clear message to the US administration is you shouldn’t care if your energy is black, white or brindle,” he said.

“To quarantine your people to just oil and gas, and geopoliticise it by saying, ‘Oh, you’re backing China instead of us’ – no. You, America, should be getting the lowest cost, highest volume energy you can into your economy.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122286

File: dc74e64be169120⋯.jpg (70.16 KB,1024x576,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: b398a98aebd0c33⋯.jpg (68.05 KB,800x600,4:3,Clipboard.jpg)

File: bae7db27577f2dd⋯.jpg (213.86 KB,1200x675,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: d4eea7acda5a599⋯.jpg (63.58 KB,1200x675,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: a9032cc8a83cb97⋯.jpg (103.79 KB,1200x675,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23631500 (210923ZSEP25) Notable: Kirk the name on many lips at conservative conference – The assassination of US activist Charlie Kirk loomed large at the opening of CPAC in Brisbane, where Australian conservatives paid tribute to the slain Trump ally. Jacinta Nampijinpa Price led with a roar “for Charlie and for freedom of speech”, while Bridget McKenzie and Matt Canavan also cited his influence. Former prime minister Tony Abbott apologised for his government’s failures, urged the Coalition to abandon net zero, and warned Peter Dutton’s campaign lacked nuclear and tax focus. Price called for lower migration, and CPAC leaders pressed conservatives to unite, even floating cooperation with One Nation to revive the movement’s electoral prospects.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122215

>>122213

>>122214

>>122216

Kirk the name on many lips at conservative conference

canberratimes.com.au - September 20 2025

Assassinated American activist Charlie Kirk has been lionised at the opening of a major conservative conference in Brisbane which has attracted Australia's leading names on the political right.

In her first high-profile appearance since being dumped as opposition defence spokeswoman, Jacinta Nampijinpa Price began by referencing the slain MAGA influencer.

"To the family of Charlie Kirk, you have my respect and the respect of the audience today," she said to robust applause at the CPAC forum.

"Let me hear you roar for Charlie and for freedom of speech."

Mr Kirk, a close ally of US President Donald Trump, was fatally shot at a university event in Utah last week.

He was well known across internet communities favoured by young conservative males.

Senator Bridget McKenzie also cited Mr Kirk in her address, while fellow Nationals senator Matt Canavan told the audience he'd in fact personally invited Mr Kirk to Brisbane for CPAC.

Former prime minister Tony Abbott took to the stage to apologise for his 2013 government's failure to live up to expectations, lamenting Labour's latest election win and drawing a line through net zero.

Australia's commitment the absolute emissions reduction target "has to be dropped and the sooner the better", he told the audience.

"Every time we have fought an election on climate and energy …. we have succeeded but every time we've simply mirrored Labor's position, we've done badly, Mr Abbott said.

"We have got to be against it."

Mr Abbott said he wanted to apologise for heading a government that should have been as good as his predecessor's but instead of more of John Howard, the electorate got "Malcolm Fraser revisited".

Putting forward his own reasons for the coalition's disastrous 43-seat 2025 election tally, he argued that Peter Dutton failed to adequately campaign on his pro-nuclear policy.

"We did not campaign against Labor's unrealised capital gains tax policy or wealth tax," he added.

"Instead ... we made the election a contest over who could give the biggest handout, a contest which the coalition is always bound to lose."

Mr Abbott urged his party to abandon "factional warlords" during a reformation as conservatives worry about bleeding voters to fringe far-right parties like One Nation.

Senator Price called for the Liberals to "prosecute the need for a profound cultural shift", including against mass migration.

"I believe the Liberals can win public support to substantially lower migration," Senator Price said.

"We just need to make families the focus of the migration debate."

CPAC chair Warren Mundine, who has previously failed at Liberal pre-selection, called for conservative groups to band together to defeat progressive politics by preferencing and supporting each other.

Senator McKenzie said conservative parties had to "stop fighting amongst ourselves".

"We tend to just bag each other out ... the stakes are too high."

CPAC director Andrew Cooper even floated the idea of a broad coalition that included One Nation so conservatives don't "squabble over scraps, but form a vision where ... one day we'll be back in government".

"That could involve, for example, a Liberal National coalition, and in the Senate, also a coalition with say One Nation," he said to a cheering crowd.

"We need to unite, the conservative brand at the moment is in dire need of revival."

https://www.canberratimes.com.au/story/9070926/kirk-the-name-on-many-lips-at-conservative-conference/

https://www.cpac.network/

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122287

File: 5bd482655145935⋯.mp4 (5 MB,406x720,203:360,Clipboard.mp4)

File: b65ef040c04d298⋯.jpg (169.44 KB,1280x720,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: f067df13832d2df⋯.jpg (76.7 KB,1280x720,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: bf808228cbe79c1⋯.jpg (134.23 KB,1280x720,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23631508 (210938ZSEP25) Notable: Video: Palestine statehood a 'point of contention' in US ties – Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has landed in New York for UN General Assembly leaders’ week, where Australia, the UK, Canada and France plan to recognise Palestine. Hours before his arrival, 25 senior Republicans, including Ted Cruz, warned recognition “may invite punitive measures” and put Canberra at odds with US policy. Analysts said it could be a flashpoint in Albanese’s hoped-for first meeting with Donald Trump, though the two leaders may overcome differences as allies. The debate comes amid UN findings branding Israel’s Gaza campaign genocide, with 65,000 Palestinians killed since October 2023.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122253

>>122271

>>122276

>>122277

Palestine statehood a 'point of contention' in US ties

Kat Wong - September 21 2025

Australia has been urged not to ignore threats of "punitive measures" from top Republicans, as the prime minister lands in the US for one of his most important diplomatic ventures.

Anthony Albanese arrived in New York City on Sunday morning Australian time ahead of a long-awaited United Nations General Assembly meeting where Australia, Canada, France and the UK will recognise the state of Palestine.

But hours before touchdown, a group of top Republican congress members and allies of Donald Trump issued an open letter to the leaders of those nations warning recognition "may invite punitive measures".

"This is something that very well could be a point of contention between the Albanese government and the Trump administration," United States Studies Centre director Jared Mondschein told AAP.

"It should not be ignored."

But that doesn't mean Australia cannot stand its ground.

The UK's foreign policy - like Australia's - has begun to diverge from the US after decades of generally moving in lock step with the world power.

UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer has been able to work through his differences with the US president.

"I would not be surprised if Prime Minister Albanese and President Trump are able to overcome their differences of opinion on this matter too," Mr Mondschein said.

Mr Albanese is hoping to secure his first face-to-face meeting with Mr Trump, though talks have not yet been scheduled.

Some speculated the two could hold discussions on the weekend before the UN event, but this was dispelled when the president announced he would attend the funeral of right-wing American commentator Charlie Kirk on Sunday in Arizona.

The prime minister was due to meet with the US president in June during the G7 summit, but was left wanting when Mr Trump departed the event early to intervene in escalating Middle East violence.

In the months since, a bilateral meeting has arguably become a lesser priority for Mr Albanese.

The US in August spared Australian goods from a tariff hike, leaving its products at the baseline 10 per cent - which is the lowest rate levied against any American trading partner.

But there is still much to discuss that extends beyond the bilateral US-Australia relationship, like the security environment and strategic competition in the Pacific.

"If Australia and the United States - who are the closest of allies - are able to get aligned on this, then that will give momentum to other allies in the region," Mr Mondschein said.

Stepping onto the tarmac at John F Kennedy International Airport in New York, Mr Albanese emphasised the importance of Australia's role on the world stage.

"What we want to see is increased peace and security and stability around the world," he told reporters.

"We are a country that play a positive role in our region, in the Pacific, as well as of course ... our traditional allies such as our Five-Eyes partners including the United States and the United Kingdom."

The letter from Republican members of Congress, including former presidential nominee Ted Cruz, claims the recognition of Palestine would undermine prospects for peace and reward terrorism.

"Proceeding with recognition will put your country at odds with long-standing US policy and interests and may invite punitive measures in response," it read.

Their statement comes days after a UN inquiry branded Israel's offensive in Gaza as an act of genocide against Palestinians.

Australia has condemned the denial of aid and killing of civilians in the territory.

Since October 2023, Israel's military campaign and throttling of aid has killed 65,000 Palestinians and left 641,000 people at risk of catastrophic levels of starvation, local health ministry and UN sources have found.

Israel's recent offensive began after designated terror group Hamas killed 1,200 civilians and took about 250 more hostage.

https://www.bordermail.com.au/story/9071018/palestine-statehood-a-point-of-contention-in-us-ties/

https://x.com/AlboMP/status/1969519262730764501

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122288

File: 686820bb62ea7f2⋯.mp4 (10.11 MB,640x360,16:9,Clipboard.mp4)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23636659 (220918ZSEP25) Notable: Historic recognition:Australia formally recognises state of Palestine as Anthony Albanese arrives in US- (Video) Australia has formally recognised Palestine, joining more than 150 nations in a coordinated international push during UN General Assembly leaders’ week. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and Foreign Minister Penny Wong framed recognition as a step towards peace, with Wong confirming government references will now use “State of Palestine.” The declaration acknowledges Palestinian Authority reforms, recognition of Israel, and excludes Hamas from any future role. The move drew sharp criticism from Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who accused Australia of rewarding terrorism, and from the Coalition at home, while Palestinian officials welcomed recognition as a prerequisite for peace and urged “concrete action” to pressure Israel on settlements and attacks in the West Bank.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122253

>>122276

>>122277

>>122287

Australia formally recognises state of Palestine as Anthony Albanese arrives in US

Tom Crowley - 21 September 2025

1/2

Australia has formally recognised Palestine as a sovereign state, becoming one of more than 150 countries to do so.

The move was previewed in August but became official on Sunday in a joint statement by Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and Foreign Minister Penny Wong.

Canada and the United Kingdom have also made formal announcements recognising a Palestinian state, and about seven other Western countries have signalled they are about to do the same.

"This is the world saying that the cycle of violence has to stop," Mr Albanese said in New York, where he is leading an Australian delegation at the 80th session of the United Nations General Assembly.

"Now is the time. You can't just watch what is unfolding there and not have a response.

"Australia is not [a] big player in the Middle East. It's not a major trading partner. We don't provide arms to Israel.

"What we can do, though, is to use this statement in conjunction with other partners to make this declaration."

The declaration says Australia "recognises the legitimate and long-held aspirations of the people of Palestine to a state of their own".

"Today's act of recognition reflects Australia's longstanding commitment to a two-state solution, which has always been the only path to enduring peace and security for the Israeli and the Palestinian people."

France, Belgium and Portugal are among the countries also using the occasion of the UN assembly to recognise Palestine, part of what the Australian statement calls "a co-ordinated international effort to build new momentum for a two-state solution".

The effect of the declaration is that Australia recognises Mahmoud Abbas, leader of the Palestinian Authority, as the head of state.

Mr Albanese had planned to meet with Mr Abbas in New York this week, but the US government denied the Palestinian leader's visa.

Speaking in New York, Senator Wong said Australia's initial practical steps would include updating references in government documents and communications to refer to the "State of Palestine" or "Palestine", rather than the "Occupied Palestinian Territories".

"Further steps will follow, such as establishing embassies to follow progress on reforms committed to by the Palestinian Authority," she said. The locations of any future embassies have not been determined.

The declaration referred to "clear requirements" on the Palestinian Authority, which Mr Albanese and Senator Wong said had "given direct undertakings to Australia, including commitments to hold democratic elections and enact significant reform to finance, governance and education".

The pair also noted the Palestinian Authority's recognition of Israel's right to exist and stated "terrorist organisation Hamas must have no role in Palestine", repeating calls for a ceasefire in Gaza and the release of the remaining 48 Israeli hostages still held captive in the strip.

France and Saudi Arabia are sponsoring a summit on Palestinian recognition at the UN's New York headquarters on Monday, local time — the first day of the UN General Assembly's high-level week.

Australia's position puts it at odds with the US. The Trump administration opposes Palestinian recognition despite America's historical support for a two-state solution.

Mr Albanese said Australia was taking its own position as a sovereign nation.

"Our foreign policy isn't determined in Washington, or Beijing, or Wellington for that matter," he said.

Hamas's deadly attacks on October 7, 2023 killed around 1,200 people and resulted in 250 taken hostage — the event being the catalyst for the current war in Gaza, which has killed more than 65,000 Palestinians and left hundreds of thousands of people displaced.

Israeli security forces have directly targeted and killed civilians "in far larger numbers compared to previous conflicts", a UN commission of inquiry found last week. It concluded Israel was committing genocide against Palestinians in Gaza.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122289

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23636672 (220931ZSEP25) Notable: Video: Australia officially recognises Palestine, shrugging off Trump complaints – Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has declared Australia will not let the United States dictate its Middle East policy, formally recognising Palestine alongside the UK, Canada and Portugal. Albanese said the move reflects Australia’s sovereignty and commitment to a two-state solution, despite US opposition and threats of “punitive measures” from senior Republicans. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu condemned recognition as a “huge reward to terrorism,” while Hamas hailed it as a victory. Foreign Minister Penny Wong confirmed immediate changes to official terminology and pledged reforms from the Palestinian Authority would guide further steps, such as opening an embassy. The Coalition criticised Labor’s timing, while Palestinian officials praised the decision as bold and principled. Albanese is in New York for the UN General Assembly, where he is also seeking his first meeting with Donald Trump.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122253

>>122277

>>122287

>>122288

Australia officially recognises Palestine, shrugging off Trump complaints

Matthew Knott - September 22, 2025

1/2

New York: Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has declared he will not let the United States dictate Australian policy on the Israel-Palestinian conflict as he defended his government’s decision to break with Washington by recognising a Palestinian state.

The move to recognise Palestine puts Australia at odds with the Trump administration as Albanese seeks to secure his first meeting with US President Donald Trump.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has declared that a Palestinian state “will not happen” as his government considers retaliating by annexing parts of the West Bank or closing diplomatic outposts in Israel.

Australia’s recognition of Palestine took formal effect on Sunday night, alongside the United Kingdom, Canada and Portugal, as world leaders try to breathe new life into the two-state solution process in a push spearheaded by French President Emmanuel Macron.

The government will proceed cautiously with the practical aspects of recognition, only taking steps such as opening an Australian embassy in Palestine when it feels the Palestinian Authority has made good on key commitments such as holding elections and internal reform.

“Australians want the people of Palestine and the people of Israel to know a future of greater hope, true security and real peace,” Albanese told reporters at United Nations headquarters in New York. “Today, we advance that cause.”

Asked whether the decision would damage relations with the US, Albanese said: “Well, this is about Australia’s position and the fact that we’re a sovereign nation. Australia will make decisions based upon our national interests.”

Saying he respected the fact that some nations would take a different view, Albanese said: “I’m saying that Australia makes our position clear as a sovereign nation. Our foreign policy isn’t determined in Washington or Beijing or Wellington for that matter. Our foreign policy is determined around the cabinet table in Canberra.”

Asked about the risk the decision could encourage Israel to accelerate plans to annex parts of the occupied West Bank, Albanese said Australia could not do nothing as hopes of a two-state solution evaporate.

“We are seeing the Israeli government continue to provide support for illegal settlements and expansion in the West Bank,” he said.

“We’re seeing a catastrophic humanitarian crisis unfold in Gaza. The idea that Israel is just sitting back waiting to negotiate is not what is happening here. This is about the world saying enough is enough, we want peace and security in the Middle East. This is Australia playing a role.”

Netanyahu condemned the move on Sunday (Monday AEST), saying recognition of a Palestinian state was a “huge reward to terrorism”.

“And I have another message for you: it will not happen. A Palestinian state will not be established west of the Jordan River,” Netanyahu said in a statement.

Senior Hamas official Mahmoud Mardawi hailed the move by Australia, Canada and the UK, telling the AFP news agency: “These developments represent a victory for Palestinian rights and the justice of our cause, and send a clear message: no matter how far the occupation goes in its crimes it will never be able to erase our national rights.”

Foreign Minister Penny Wong said: “This is the moment, the best opportunity that we have as a country to contribute to momentum towards a two-state solution.”

Wong declined to say when or where Australia would establish an embassy in Palestine, but said such steps would be conditional on the Palestinian Authority meeting its commitments to reform and democratisation.

However, Wong said the government would immediately begin referring to the State of Palestine in official documents, rather than the previous nomenclature of “occupied Palestinian territories”.

Australia and Indonesia will work with the Palestinian Authority to improve the education curriculum for Palestinian students, she said.

Executive Council of Australian Jewry president Daniel Aghion attacked the decision, and said: “Far from creating momentum towards a two-state peace, recognition of a Palestinian state in these circumstances will set the process back.

“Hamas and the other terrorist groups have already hailed the move as a reward for their violence and rejectionism towards Israel ... They will now have less incentive, not more, to release the hostages and disarm.”

The Palestinian Authority’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs praised Australia’s “bold and principled decision”, and said it “reflects a firm commitment to international law, as well as demonstrates a genuine dedication to ending the occupation and achieving lasting peace”.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122290

File: 6aed169af74becd⋯.jpg (793.13 KB,1920x1080,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: e9b2837c281763a⋯.jpg (2.72 MB,3000x2000,3:2,Clipboard.jpg)

File: ad892a3b59c4f04⋯.jpg (1.98 MB,3000x2000,3:2,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23636685 (220943ZSEP25) Notable: Analysis: So much for cosying up to Trump. Albanese has asserted his independence on day one"By officially recognising Palestinian statehood, Anthony Albanese has … issued a declaration of independence from the United States and an assertion of Australian sovereignty over its foreign policy. … Albanese rejected Trump’s view that recognising Palestine is a reward for Hamas … and kiboshed the idea Australia must be in lockstep with the US on every big global issue. … The reason Trump hasn’t made time to meet Albanese is not because he’s angry about Palestine, but because … he views Australia as something of an afterthought in the geopolitical chess game. … Disagreement over Palestine is just one more irritant in a relationship strained by tariffs, defence spending and climate." – Matthew Knott, The Age

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122253

>>122277

>>122287

>>122288

Analysis: So much for cosying up to Trump. Albanese has asserted his independence on day one

Matthew Knott - September 22, 2025

1/2

New York: By officially recognising Palestinian statehood, Anthony Albanese has done more than send a message to the world about how Australia views the Middle East peace process. He has issued a declaration of independence from the United States and an assertion of Australian sovereignty over its foreign policy.

It’s a bold move, and a risky one. Albanese is breaking with Trump on a totemic, divisive issue just as he tries to establish a personal relationship with the president and lock in the pair’s first meeting.

Albanese has begun his first trip to the US since Trump’s return to office by dangling a lantern over a point of contention, rather than unity in the US-Australia relationship. The government’s decision to recognise Palestine, alongside the United Kingdom and Canada, made a big splash in the US, even leading the website of The New York Times. Accentuating the positives and eliminating the negatives in the bilateral relationship didn’t stand a chance.

Yet if Albanese felt any discomfort about the awkward timing of the announcement, he showed no sign of it when speaking to reporters at United Nations headquarters on Sunday. Albanese was in Trump’s home town, a block away from one of the real estate mogul’s skyscrapers. Yet cosying up to Trump wasn’t on his agenda. Instead, Albanese rejected Trump’s view that recognising Palestine is a reward for Hamas, the listed terror group that launched the brutal massacre in Israel on October 7, 2023. And he kiboshed the idea Australia must be in lockstep with the US on every big global issue.

“This is about Australia’s position and the fact that we’re a sovereign nation. Australia will make decisions based upon our national interests,” Albanese said. He looked relaxed.

Pressed on whether the move would damage ties with the US, he replied: “Our foreign policy isn’t determined in Washington or Beijing or Wellington, for that matter. Our foreign policy is determined around the cabinet table in Canberra.”

Australia is among the last countries in the world to recognise Palestine, but Albanese spoke about the move as if it were uncontroversial common sense.

“If you support two states, it’s not Israel and, you know, something else, and Marrickville,” he said, referring to a suburb in his inner-west Sydney electorate. “It’s Israel and Palestine.”

How could Australia simply sit back and do nothing, he asked, while Israel continues to pummel Gaza with bombs and accelerates settlement building in the occupied West Bank?

Furious at Benjamin Netanyahu’s refusal to end the war or countenance a two-state solution, Albanese believes he has put Australia on the right side of history by recognising Palestine. He views it as moral decision, as much as a political one.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122291

File: 2d1e14c0ed23eb0⋯.jpg (169.43 KB,1882x1059,1882:1059,Clipboard.jpg)

File: e0ee701c323bfe5⋯.jpg (166.49 KB,2047x1152,2047:1152,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 78c3818a037342a⋯.jpg (211.19 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23636698 (220950ZSEP25) Notable: Israeli MP Simcha Rothman appeals visa cancellation – Israeli MP Simcha Rothman has launched a legal appeal against Australia’s decision to cancel his visa, saying his political views on Hamas and Gaza were “lawfully held” and “mainstream” in Israel but misrepresented as inflammatory. The Religious Zionist Party member and Knesset committee chair was barred last month over fears his remarks, including describing Gazan children as “our enemies,” could provoke unrest. His lawyers argue the cancellation unlawfully burdened free political communication, noting his planned events were for Jewish audiences only. Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke defended the decision, saying the government would prevent “hate and division” from being imported. Rothman addressed supporters virtually at an Australian Jewish Association event.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109555 (pb)

>>109561 (pb)

>>109562 (pb)

Israeli MP Simcha Rothman appeals visa cancellation

JOANNA PANAGOPOULOS - 22 September 2025

An Israeli MP is urging the Department of Home Affairs to “immediately revoke” the cancellation of his visa, saying his political views are “lawfully held” and “mainstream” in Israel, and were wrongly treated as “inflammatory and concerning”.

Simcha Rothman – a member of Israel’s far-right Religious Zionist Party and chair of the Knesset’s Constitution, Law and Justice Committee – was blocked from Australia last month due to his “concerning” calls for the elimination of terror group Hamas via the total conquest of Gaza, and fears his presence could “be a risk to the good order” of the Islamic community.

The cancellation of the elected official’s visa, amid tit-for-tat visa cancellations, led to Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu branding Anthony Albanese “weak”.

Warlows Legal, representing Mr Rothman on a pro bono basis, alongside the Australian Jewish Association – who invited Mr Rothman to speak in Australia before his visa was cancelled – argued the cancellation “impermissibly burdened the implied freedom of political communication”.

On Sunday, Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke said that “seeking legal appeal was Mr Rothman’s right,” adding: “Our government will continue to use the tools available to us to prevent hate and division from being imported into this country.”

AJA chief executive Robert Gregory told The Australian synagogues, schools, and communities across Australia – who were meant to hear from Mr Rothman – “remain eager to hear from him, and we hope to reschedule”. He said the Jewish community “hopes this mistake will be corrected”.

The far-right Israeli politician appeared at the AJA event last month virtually.

The appeal stated that the reason given for the visa cancellation – that there “would or might be a risk to the health, safety or good order of … the Islamic community” – was “not only entirely ill-founded, it is absurd, irrational and false” since he was to “speak primarily to Jewish audiences in closed-door, pre-booked meetings”.

It stated his “mainstream and lawful political views aligned with Australia’s own designation of Hamas as a terrorist organisation”.

Home Affairs previously said Mr Rothman was denied his visa for fear his past comments – including calling Gazan children “our enemies” and calling for Palestinians to be relocated to other countries – would spark counter-protests.

“The visa holder’s social media and public statements as described above mirror the policies of his Religious Zionist Party including the elimination of Hamas and the expansion and sovereignty of the Israeli state, and denial of any wrongdoing by Israel against Palestinians and Gaza during the current conflict,” the Home Affairs decision read.

Warlows Legal, in the appeal, said Mr Rothman’s political opinions were “wrongly construed” as “inflammatory and concerning”, and said the assertion that he said Israel “doesn’t … let the children leave Gaza” because “they are our enemies” was an “outrageous … misrepresentation”.

In a Channel 4 News interview, the transcript of which was provided in the appeal document, Mr Rothman was asked why Israel didn’t let Gazan civilians over the border after he said they were being used as “human shields” by Hamas.

He responded “because they are our enemies”. The reporter then asked: “The children are your enemies?”, to which he responded: “They are our enemies and according to international treaties about refugees in the time of war, you don’t let them conquer your country with refugees.”

His lawyer said while the current Australian government “does not share” this “widely held Israeli political view in relation to sovereignty”, “it surely does not follow that it revokes the visas of any foreigner”.

He also argued a statement made in YNet News that a two-state solution had “poisoned the minds of the entire world and will never solve the conflict” was probably the “predominant view in Israel” since October 7.

“The question is whether Australia is becoming a non-free-speech zone country – which only gives visas to persons who happen to share the same opinions of the government of the day,” he wrote.

Referring to comments about the “expansion of sovereignty”, the appeal stated that the views of Mr Rothman “are shared by an overriding majority of Israelis, as well as the majority of the Israeli Knesset”.

“It is factually false to describe Mr Rothman’s views in this regard as ‘far-right’ opinion.”

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/israeli-mp-simcha-rothman-appeals-visa-cancellation/news-story/e45a7794b41938c5441dc6b2e10f0c91

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122292

File: 2fbf68e86d87972⋯.jpg (194.9 KB,1638x922,819:461,Clipboard.jpg)

File: e48014629b3f15c⋯.jpg (210.01 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23636705 (220958ZSEP25) Notable: Critics of Australia-PNG defence treaty circle in fresh threat to pact – Papua New Guinea’s Pukpuk defence treaty with Australia has come under renewed scrutiny, with former prime minister Peter O’Neill warning it undermines the nation’s “friends to all, enemies to none” policy. PNG’s former ambassador to Belgium and the EU, Joshua Kalinoe, urged a full domestic review, including an eminent persons panel and parliamentary oversight. Beijing has cautioned PNG against signing “exclusive” deals, while Prime Minister James Marape may meet Chinese Premier Li Qiang at the UN. Police Minister Peter Tsiamalili Jr defended the treaty as a “framework of trust, respect and responsibility” for regional security. The agreement would commit PNG and Australia to mutual defence, embed personnel in each other’s forces, and bar security pacts with third parties, though critics fear erosion of sovereignty.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122243

>>122246

>>122259

>>122267

>>122272

Critics of Australia-PNG defence treaty circle in fresh threat to pact

BEN PACKHAM - 21 September 2025

1/2

Questions are mounting in Papua New Guinea over its stalled ­mutual defence treaty with Australia, with former prime minister Peter O’Neill warning that the proposed alliance could violate PNG’s independent foreign policy and one of the country’s most senior former diplomats urging a lengthy review of the pact.

The pushback came amid expectations that PNG’s Prime Minister, James Marape, could meet with Chinese Premier Li Qiang on the sidelines of the UN General Assembly in New York this week, which would expose him to the brunt of Beijing’s anger over the deal.

Anthony Albanese’s hopes of signing the Pukpuk treaty with Mr Marape in Port Moresby last week were dashed after PNG’s cabinet failed to approve the text because it could not achieve a quorum, in a setback that came just eight days after Vanuatu rejected a $500m security agreement with Australia.

Mr Marape, who says he remains committed to the treaty, is now in a race against time to have it approved by his cabinet by late October, when Australia will host an array of PNG government ministers for an annual forum.

Mr O’Neill, who is now in opposition, told The Australian he hadn’t seen the text of the proposed agreement but said “the Marape government lacks a cohesive foreign policy and seems to be making a serious departure from PNG’s longstanding policy of being friends to all and enemies to none”.

Meanwhile, PNG’s former ambassador to Belgium and the EU, Joshua Kalinoe, called for “a thorough domestic review and consultative process” that would tie up the treaty process in knots.

He said an eminent persons panel should be established to examine the treaty, “comprising retired citizen technocrats and bureaucrats with the requisite experience in public policy, diplomacy and constitutional and international law”.

Mr Kalinoe said the panel’s findings should then be considered by PNG’s parliamentary committee on foreign affairs and defence before cabinet ministers were presented with the final document to endorse.

“Parliament should be engaged at this early stage because eventually it will ratify the treaty before it comes into force” he said in a statement.

PNG Defence Minister Billy Joseph is due to travel to Beijing in coming weeks to explain the deal to his Chinese counterpart, but is not expected to depart until Mr Marape returns from the UN.

Mr Marape’s spokesman said he was yet to receive a request for a meeting with Mr Li in New York. However, expectations were mounting that a request would be lodged, which would be difficult for Mr Marape to refuse.

Beijing has already urged PNG not to sign anything that is “exclusive in nature” and prevents it from “co-operating with a third party”, warning the country’s independence could be at stake.

“We hope that the PNG side will continue to uphold independence and self-reliance, properly handle issues bearing on its sovereignty and long-term interests, and work with China to maintain the sound development of China-PNG relations and mutually beneficial co-operation,” the Chinese embassy in Port Moresby said.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122293

File: 35ce31b5f695790⋯.jpg (303.79 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: e041650d4054990⋯.jpg (410.51 KB,2048x1536,4:3,Clipboard.jpg)

File: b2262ea8b43782a⋯.jpg (253.9 KB,1600x900,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23636726 (221016ZSEP25) Notable: Jacinta Allan rejects claims of naivety, says China relationship built on values not transactions – Victorian Premier Jacinta Allan has rejected claims she is naive in her approach to Beijing, insisting Chinese officials and leaders showed Victoria “an incredibly warm extension of friendship”. Critics argue she underestimates the transactional and strategic nature of the Chinese Communist Party, which uses trade leverage, education exchanges and diaspora influence to advance its interests. Throughout her five-day trip, Allan repeatedly referred to Chinese-Victorians as “navigators” of her new China strategy. Allan was reluctant to say whether previously imprisoned television presenter Cheng Lei and Hong Kong activist Kevin Yam, both of whom live in Melbourne, were also “navigators” of the relationship. Dismissing suggestions of naivety, Allan said her meetings with officials such as Education Minister Huai Jinpeng focused on “shared values” like family and security.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122162

>>122244

>>122250

>>122275

Jacinta Allan rejects claims of naivety, says China relationship built on values not transactions

ANTHONY GALLOWAY - 21 September 2025

1/2

Victorian Premier Jacinta Allan has rejected claims she is being naive in her dealings with Beijing, insisting the Chinese Communist Party and its apparat­chiks are not purely trans­actional and have extended “a warm extension of friendship” to Victoria.

In an interview with The Australian from the western city of Chengdu, Ms Allan defended her government’s new China strategy and dismissed criticism of predecessor Daniel Andrews’s business ventures in the country, describing the attacks as “being driven by some to be divisive on the basis of where people come from … Conservative politicians are saying every day that China is bad for people”.

“And I say that jobs and relationships are good for people,” Ms Allan said before flying back to Melbourne.

Her comments capped a five-day, five-city visit to China, during which she met senior officials, including Education Minister Huai Jinpeng, a member of the CCP’s Central Committee, alongside business and cultural leaders. Unlike Mr Andrews, who tied Victoria to Beijing’s Belt and Road Initiative, Ms Allan has emphasised cultural and educational ties in her strategy released last week.

Yet as with Mr Andrews’s seven trips to China as premier, there was also a focus on infrastructure. Ms Allan announced on Friday that her government had ordered four more giant boring machines from China Railway Engineering Equipment Group to cut tunnels for the $34.5bn Suburban Rail Loop, saying “Chinese companies are investing in the SRL – and Victorian workers are building it”.

She rejected suggestions she was being naive and overlooking the transactional nature of the Chinese government. “With all respect, that’s not how I see how the Chinese community here. The government, the business leaders, the leaders of cultural institutions … that is not how I would see leaders that I have been meeting with,” she told The Australian.

“Every meeting I have, it’s a conversation about family, shared values, hard work, about wanting to build a more secure future.

“So I would reject, pretty strongly, that from China’s perspective it’s all transactional. Because from what I saw this week — it was an incredibly warm extension of friendship.”

Ms Allan said her meeting with Mr Huai was the most consequential of the trip, citing the “longstanding benefits” for Victorian students and Chinese exchange programs. She noted their “shared passion” for education exchanges at a time of “too much instability”, saying such instability was being exploited “to be divisive on the basis of where people come from”.

The visit was complicated by Mr Andrews’s appearance at a military parade in Beijing earlier this month while operating a private consultancy business he established with his former China adviser Marty Mei. The firm was established to help companies ­access the Chinese market.

Ms Allan said she had not spoken with Mr Andrews before her own trip. “He is a private citizen … I am not aware of the travel plans of every private citizen in the great state of Victoria, and that includes former premiers.”

Pressed on whether she shared concerns about Mr Andrews repeatedly praising Beijing as premier before setting up his consul­tancy, she responded: “That focus is being more driven by politics, and the politics of division.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122294

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23642016 (230927ZSEP25) Notable: ‘Real hope for a place they call home’: Albanese’s plea to world leaders on Palestine - (Video) Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has urged world leaders at the United Nations in New York to seize a “moment of opportunity” to disarm Hamas and revive a two-state solution to the Israel-Palestinian conflict. Speaking a day after Australia formally recognised Palestine alongside Canada and Britain, Albanese said recognition offered “real hope for a place they call home” and must help drive Hamas “out of the region once and for all”. The move drew praise from France and condemnation from Israel, while Opposition Leader Sussan Ley told US Republicans Labor’s decision “does not enjoy bipartisan support” and would be reversed under a Coalition government.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122253

>>122277

>>122287

>>122288

>>122289

‘Real hope for a place they call home’: Albanese’s plea to world leaders on Palestine

Matthew Knott - September 23, 2025

1/2

New York: Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has urged world leaders to seize an opportunity to permanently disarm Hamas and drive the listed terrorist group out of the Middle East by reviving efforts to achieve a two-state solution to the Israel-Palestinian conflict.

Albanese addressed a conference on the two-state solution at the United Nations in New York on Tuesday morning (AEST), a day after Australia’s recognition of Palestine took formal effect alongside Canada’s and Britain’s.

In his speech to the two-state solution conference, Albanese said that the Arab League’s call for Hamas to end its rule in Gaza and lay down its weapons had created a “moment of opportunity” that the world must not let pass by.

“A chance to deliver self-determination for the people of Palestine in a way that permanently disarms and isolates Hamas – and drives them out of the region once and for all,” Albanese said.

“In recognising Palestine, Australia recognises the legitimate and long-held aspirations of the Palestinian people. That means more than a seat, a voice and a vote in the councils of the world. It means real hope for a place they call home.”

But Albanese’s announcement was undercut by Opposition Leader Sussan Ley, who wrote to Republican legislators on Monday to assure them that Albanese’s move did not have bipartisan support because she said it would reward Hamas and was divorced from reality.

“Given the concerns raised, I write to reassure you, and the Congress, that this decision taken at this time by the Labor government does not enjoy bipartisan support here in Australia,” Ley wrote in her letter to Republicans, including former presidential hopeful Ted Cruz, senators Rick Scott and Tom Cotton, and Elise Stefanik, Trump’s original choice to serve as US ambassador to the UN.

Ley added: “The federal opposition opposes this decision and would reverse it, should we form government.”

French President Emmanuel Macron, who spearheaded the conference with Saudi Arabia’s Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, announced that France would officially recognise Palestine as he pleaded with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to end the war in Gaza and back the creation of an independent Palestinian state.

“We are just a few moments away from no longer being able to seize peace,” Macron said in his speech, which received a standing ovation from some delegates.

“Some might say it’s too late; some might say it’s too late ... but one thing is certain: we can no longer wait.”

Macron thanked nations, including Australia, for answering his call to recognise Palestine as he called for the international community to create a “cycle for peace” instead of a cycle of violence.

The French leader called for Hamas to release all the remaining Israeli hostages held in Gaza, but said this was no reason to prolong the bloodshed.

“Nothing justifies the ongoing war in Gaza,” he said in a passionate address. “Nothing.”

Netanyahu and fellow Israeli politicians have reacted angrily to the recognition push, declaring there would never be a Palestinian state and threatening retaliation when Netanyahu returns to Jerusalem following his trip to the US.

Speaking to the conference via video link after the Trump administration denied him a visa to travel to New York, Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas condemned antisemitism and the October 7, 2023, attack on Israel, which killed about 1200 people and triggered the war.

Declaring that Hamas must have “no role” in governing Gaza in the future, he said: “Hamas and other factions must surrender their weapons to the Palestinian Authority.

“What we want is one unified state without weapons, a state with one law and one legitimate security forces.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122295

File: 7d96c25af4fe7d4⋯.jpg (3 MB,3000x2000,3:2,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 7ba2930e6f509e4⋯.jpg (2.05 MB,3000x2000,3:2,Clipboard.jpg)

File: b5254a78410e315⋯.jpg (996.46 KB,2918x1933,2918:1933,Clipboard.jpg)

File: c6fe16080187156⋯.jpg (3.89 MB,3000x2000,3:2,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23642050 (230947ZSEP25) Notable: Meeting between Anthony Albanese and Donald Trump unlikely ahead of UN address - The White House has confirmed Prime Minister Anthony Albanese will not hold a one-on-one meeting with US President Donald Trump during the United Nations General Assembly in New York. Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt listed Trump’s meetings with leaders from Ukraine, Argentina, and the European Union, but omitted Australia. Trump will instead greet Albanese briefly at a reception for world leaders before delivering a speech pledging “renewal of American strength” and criticising “globalist institutions”. Leavitt said Trump believes recognition of Palestine by Australia, Canada, and the UK “rewards Hamas” and fails to advance peace.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122253

>>122277

>>122287

>>122289

>>122294

Meeting between Anthony Albanese and Donald Trump unlikely ahead of UN address

David Speers - 23 September 2025

The White House has all but confirmed there will be no one-on-one meeting between US President Donald Trump and Prime Minister Anthony Albanese in New York during the United Nations General Assembly this week.

In announcing Mr Trump's itinerary for his roughly 24 hours in New York, White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt has listed his meetings, with no mention of Anthony Albanese.

Mr Trump will have bilateral meetings with the UN secretary-general and the leaders of Ukraine, Argentina and the European Union.

He will also attend a multilateral meeting with Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Indonesia, Türkiye, Pakistan, Egypt, the United Arab Emirates and Jordan.

The Australian prime minister will at least have a chance for a handshake and interaction at a "welcome reception" being hosted by Trump for more than 100 world leaders on Tuesday night, New York time.

The White House press secretary also gave a taste of what to expect from Mr Trump's first address to the UN since his return to the White House.

It will be "a major speech touting renewal of American strength", Leavitt told reporters at the White House, including his "historic accomplishments in eight months, including the ending of seven wars and conflicts".

Mr Trump will also use his address to the global forum to "touch upon how globalist institutions have significantly decayed the world order".

Later in the week, the US president will host Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan at the White House.

The outline means Australia's hopes for a one-on-one meeting appear to have been dashed again.

If there is no meeting in New York, Mr Albanese will have to wait for an opportunity at the APEC and ASEAN summits next month.

On the decision of US allies Australia, Canada and the United Kingdom to formally recognise Palestinian statehood yesterday, Mr Trump did not immediately react, as he was attending a memorial for Charlie Kirk.

Ms Leavitt told reporters the president "feels this does not do anything to release the hostages [in Gaza], does nothing to end this conflict and bring this war to a close".

"Frankly, he believes this is a reward to Hamas", Ms Leavitt said. "So he believes these decisions are just more talk and not enough action from some of our friends and allies."

Mr Trump will express these concerns himself from the floor of the UN tomorrow, when he delivers his address to the General Assembly.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-09-23/meeting-unlikely-between-albanese-and-trump/105804978

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122296

File: 9129c9577476ebd⋯.jpg (308.39 KB,1920x1280,3:2,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 3146737b576f418⋯.jpg (2.47 MB,3000x2000,3:2,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 54186d649434e7f⋯.jpg (2.34 MB,3000x2000,3:2,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23642102 (231020ZSEP25) Notable: Trump’s Albanese snub raises questions about Rudd’s clout – US President Donald Trump has omitted Prime Minister Anthony Albanese from his official schedule at the United Nations General Assembly, fuelling concerns over Australia’s standing in Washington and ambassador Kevin Rudd’s influence. Trump’s itinerary includes leaders from Ukraine, Argentina and the EU, but not Australia, after Albanese’s recognition of Palestinian statehood drew White House criticism as a “reward for Hamas.” Former ambassador Arthur Sinodinos said the lack of a meeting “encourages speculation,” while ex-defence official Michael Shoebridge said “Trump is just not that into us.” Critics including Senator Andrew Bragg blamed Rudd’s history of anti-Trump comments for the diplomatic freeze.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122176

>>122262

>>122287

>>122289

>>122295

Trump’s Albanese snub raises questions about Rudd’s clout

Michael Koziol and Matthew Knott - September 23, 2025

1/2

New York: Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has been snubbed from Donald Trump’s official schedule of meetings in New York, raising concerns about the strength of Australia’s ties with the United States and ambassador Kevin Rudd’s level of influence with the White House.

Albanese will be left to compete for a handshake with the US president at a reception with more than 100 other world leaders at an event on Wednesday morning (AEST), after again failing to secure a meeting with Trump.

Trump also took a dim view of the decision by Australia and others to recognise a Palestinian state, saying through his press secretary, Karoline Leavitt, that it was a reward for Hamas and did nothing to bring Israeli hostages home.

As a Labor frontbencher argued it was a “good thing” that Albanese and Trump had not met, the Coalition accused the Trump administration of treating Australia like a “piece of dirt”.

Leavitt confirmed Trump’s schedule at the United Nations would include bilateral meetings with the UN secretary-general and the presidents of Ukraine, Argentina and the European Commission.

Trump will also attend a multilateral meeting with the leaders of an array of Middle Eastern countries, Turkey, Pakistan and Indonesia.

But Australia and Albanese were omitted from the schedule, despite earlier suggestions from both sides that a bilateral meeting was possible on the sidelines of the summit or at the White House.

Over the past week, however, the Australian government played down the prospect of a formal one-on-one meeting with Trump. The president’s availability was further reduced when he flew to Arizona on Sunday for the memorial for assassinated activist Charlie Kirk.

“We will meet when we meet,” Albanese told the ABC last week. “There’s a range of events occurring as well ... that means that people’s arrangements will be finalised when they’re finalised.”

He will still have the opportunity to meet the president in person at a reception Trump is hosting on Tuesday night (Wednesday AEST) that Leavitt said would be attended by more than 100 world leaders.

“I’ll be talking with him there,” Albanese told Channel Seven’s Sunrise program on Monday.

After the reception, Trump will fly back to Washington, where he is scheduled to hold a meeting and lunch with Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan on Thursday.

Former Australian ambassador to the US Arthur Sinodinos said it was disappointing that Albanese and Trump had not been able to arrange a meeting since last November’s presidential election.

“Going so long without a person-to-person meeting encourages speculation about what is going on. It’s important for the leaders to establish a personal relationship and discuss important matters like trade, co-operation on critical minerals and AUKUS,” he said.

Liberal senator Andrew Bragg said Australia had been treated like a “piece of dirt” by the Trump administration after Kevin Rudd was appointed ambassador to the US in 2023.

“I think it’s very embarrassing,” Bragg told Nine’s Today on Tuesday.

“I think that perhaps sending Mr Rudd was actually not in Australia’s interests, and also the way that Mr Albanese has conducted his diplomacy, he’s also been a disaster. I mean, where we’re being punished, frankly, and it’s now very embarrassing.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122297

File: c2a1b79f4033d51⋯.jpg (2.93 MB,5000x3334,2500:1667,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 29ed8e84b813931⋯.jpg (192.55 KB,750x659,750:659,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 6656abd632be42e⋯.jpg (442.9 KB,750x1305,50:87,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23642134 (231033ZSEP25) Notable: Ley writes to Republicans vowing to revoke Palestine recognition ahead of Albanese's UN address – Opposition Leader Sussan Ley has written to 25 US Republicans, assuring them that a future Coalition government would revoke Australia’s recognition of a Palestinian state. The letter, sent as Anthony Albanese prepared to address the United Nations, pledged to “reverse this decision” and restore bipartisan alignment with Washington. Ley told Israeli Foreign Minister Gideon Sa’ar she was “disappointed” by Labor’s break with precedent, as he praised her promise. The move came after Republicans warned of “punitive measures” for nations recognising Palestine. Foreign Minister Penny Wong accused Ley of going “rogue”, while Arthur Sinodinos downplayed any long-term rift in Australia-US relations.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122253

>>122277

>>122287

>>122289

>>122294

Ley writes to Republicans vowing to revoke Palestine recognition ahead of Albanese's UN address

Jake Evans - 22 September 2025

1/2

Opposition Leader Sussan Ley has taken the unorthodox step of writing to United States Republicans to reassure the Congress members that a Coalition government would withdraw recognition of a Palestinian state.

The letter was dispatched ahead of a major address by Prime Minister Anthony Albanese to the United Nations, where he told the international community why Australia was recognising a Palestinian state.

On Sunday, the Australian government formally recognised Palestine jointly with the United Kingdom and Canada, accelerated by Israel's actions in Gaza.

In an address to the UN General Assembly, the prime minister warned that Gaza was in the grip of a humanitarian catastrophe for which the Israeli government must accept "its share" of responsibility.

He said the ongoing conflict, the illegal expansion of settlements in the West Bank and threats to permanently displace Palestinian people were putting a two-state solution beyond reach, and a different path must be taken.

"We must break this cycle of violence and build something better," Mr Albanese said.

"Working together, we can build a future where instead of children in Gaza dying in pain, living in fear or being taught to hate — they can go to school, build a 'life in larger freedom', aspire to raise children of their own.

"That future depends on recognition being followed by reconstruction and reform."

Mr Albanese repeated that Hamas could play no role in the governance of Palestine, and the Palestinian Authority must keep its promises to demilitarise, hold democratic elections and reform its finances and education programs.

A "day after" peace plan that would be enacted following the end of conflict in Gaza is expected to be progressed at the UN.

The Albanese government's decision to recognise Palestine is one of the most significant splits in foreign policy between Labor and the Coalition, which until the announcement held the same longstanding position that recognition would follow a negotiated two-state solution between Palestine and Israel.

Ms Ley spoke to Israeli Foreign Minister Gideon Sa'ar on Monday to express her "disappointment at this break with bipartisanship" with Labor on the issue of recognition and to reiterate the Coalition's position, she said on X.

Mr Sa'ar said he expressed Israel's "appreciation for her position" and the promise to reverse the decision. He also invited Ms Ley to visit Israel.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122298

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23646815 (240909ZSEP25) Notable: ‘Pathetic’ renewables and open borders: Donald Trump unleashes on UN in blistering address – (Video) Donald Trump used his United Nations General Assembly speech to denounce the UN as weak and “globalist”, mock renewable energy as “a joke”, and call climate change “the greatest con job ever perpetrated on the world”. He said wind turbines were “pathetic” and blamed the green energy agenda for Europe’s decline, defending coal as “clean and beautiful”. Trump accused the UN of funding illegal migration and declared, “Your countries are going to hell.” He condemned nations recognising Palestine, calling it a “reward to Hamas”, and said climate policies “transfer wealth to polluting countries like China”.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122253

>>122278

>>122289

‘Pathetic’ renewables and open borders: Donald Trump unleashes on UN in blistering address

JOE KELLY - 24 September 2025

1/3

Donald Trump has used his major speech to the United Nations General Assembly to launch a ferocious attack on the institution, ridicule the global transition to clean energy and label climate change as the “greatest con job ever perpetrated on the world”.

Speaking on Tuesday morning local time, Mr Trump accused the UN of impotence in failing to end wars, while at the same time undermining national sovereignty by funding uncontrolled migration.

“Your countries are going to hell,” he told global leaders.

The US President described green energy and uncontrolled migration as a “double-tailed dragon” that had ravaged Europe. He made it clear America would not go down the same path.

In the most contentious part of his nearly hour-long speech, Mr Trump launched a lengthy attack on the international push to renewables, saying it was fundamentally misguided.

He said clean energy sources too often lost money, needed to be subsidised by governments and lacked the strength to power major manufacturing operations, which were closing down, leading to jobs being lost to developing countries.

Mr Trump said wind turbines were “pathetic” and other clean energy sources were “a joke”.

“They don’t work. They’re too expensive. They’re not strong enough to fire up the plants that you need to make your country great,” he said.

Warning that climate change was a politically correct fraud, Mr Trump said the concept of a carbon footprint was a “hoax made up by people with evil intentions”.

He urged countries to abandon what he called the “green scam” or risk collapse, accusing the UN of making incorrect and alarmist predictions. “They were made by stupid people,” he said.

Mr Trump said climate policies did not benefit the environment, but did “redistribute manufacturing and industrial activity from developed countries … to polluting countries that are making a fortune”.

He also mounted a strong defence of fossil fuels, including coal, which he described as “clean and beautiful”.

Opening his speech, Mr Trump said that it was six years since he had last spoken at the UN and argued that the world was – at that time – prosperous and at peace. However, since then, “the guns of war have shattered the peace I forged on two continents”.

He said an era of “calm and stability” had given way to one of great crises, and warned that America had descended into weakness, lawlessness and radicalism under his predecessor, Joe Biden.

America now the ‘hottest in the world’

Yet, Mr Trump said that in less than eight months of his leadership, the US had been transformed into the “hottest” country in the world. The President claimed success in ushering in a golden age he had promised upon taking office.

Rattling through his domestic agenda on the world stage, Mr Trump said the costs of energy, petrol, groceries and mortgages were down, while the stock market was up.

He told the General Assembly he had attracted a new wave of investment into the country and helped to turbo charge the economy through tax cuts and a deregulation agenda.

He said his border policies had been a huge success, arguing the number of illegal migrants entering the US had been reduced to zero for four consecutive months, saying authorities had “repelled a colossal invasion”.

The world now respected the US, he said, claiming that the country had been regarded as a laughing stock before he was re-elected.

The improved standing of the US was evident in the recent commitment of NATO members to increase defence spending to 5 per cent of GDP and through Mr Trump’s diplomatic initiatives in the Middle East.

He said his administration had struck a range of successful trade deals, while also claiming he had “ended seven unendable wars”.

“No other country has ever done anything like that,” he said. “It’s never happened before.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122299

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23648178 (241825ZSEP25) Notable: ‘Your countries are going to hell’: Trump stuns UN with tirade on immigration, climate ‘con job’ – (Video) Donald Trump delivered a 55-minute UN address railing against “unchecked immigration” and the “greatest con job ever perpetrated” — climate change. He said “illegal aliens are pouring into Europe” and that multiculturalism would be “the death of Western Europe”, urging nations to “protect their communities”. Trump mocked renewables as a “green energy scam”, declared “the carbon footprint is a hoax”, and shamed Europe for buying Russian oil. He condemned nations recognising Palestine, saying it “rewards Hamas”, and ridiculed the UN itself as a symbol of globalist failure. The speech was marred by teleprompter failure and an escalator malfunction, which Trump joked were “the two things I got from the United Nations”.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122253

>>122278

>>122294

>>122298

‘Your countries are going to hell’: Trump stuns UN with tirade on immigration, climate ‘con job’

Michael Koziol - September 24, 2025

1/2

New York: US President Donald Trump has used the global stage of the United Nations to lecture the world on the “disaster” of unchecked immigration and the “con job” of climate change in a defiant and at-times threatening address that asserted American dominance and put other leaders on notice.

Trump urged the nations present, particularly those in Europe, to control their borders and preserve their sovereignty, and argued that what made the world beautiful was not a mix of peoples and cultures but “that each country is unique”.

“Illegal aliens are pouring into Europe. It’s not sustainable. And because they choose to be politically correct, they’re doing absolutely nothing about it,” he said.

“Proud nations must be allowed to protect their communities and prevent their societies being overwhelmed by people they have never seen before with different customs, religions – with different everything.

“Both the immigration and their suicidal energy ideas will be the death of Western Europe if something is not done immediately.”

Trump spoke of his success in shutting down the US’s southern border and implored Europe to follow his lead. “I’m really good at this stuff,” he said. “Your countries are going to hell.”

He made an example of multicultural London, again condemning its Muslim mayor Sadiq Khan. “Now they want to go to Sharia law,” Trump falsely claimed. “But you’re in a different country, you can’t do that.”

In an equally savage diatribe on what he incorrectly called the “hoax” of climate change, Trump railed against renewable energy, windmills and solar panels.

“They said global warming will kill the world, but then it started getting cooler. So now they just call it climate change,” he said. “If it goes higher, lower, whatever the hell happens, there’s climate change. It’s the greatest con job ever perpetrated on the world, in my opinion.”

Trump said the dire predictions about global warming’s impact on the earth were made by “stupid people” who had cost their countries a fortune in economic growth.

“I’m really good at predicting things,” he said, citing a popular MAGA hat and T-shirt slogan that says: Trump Was Right About Everything.

“I don’t say that in a braggadocios way, but it’s true – I’ve been right about everything. And I’m telling you that if you don’t get away from the green energy scam, your country is going to fail.

“The carbon footprint is a hoax made up by people with evil intentions, and they’re heading down a path of total destruction.”

In the hall of the UN General Assembly, some of Trump’s remarks were met with murmurs. As his speech continued past the 40-minute mark, a handful of delegates left the room, appearing to grow restless.

Trump pointed out the sacrifices Europe made to reduce carbon emissions had been wiped out by increases in China and other developing nations. There was therefore no point having clean air, he asserted.

“The problem is that other countries, like China, which has air that’s a little bit rough – it blows,” Trump said, gesturing to indicate the wind’s movement.

“And no matter what you’re doing down there, the air up here tends to get very dirty because it comes in from other countries. And the environmentalists refuse to acknowledge that.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122300

File: bbba74f4393c41e⋯.jpg (63.9 KB,1080x810,4:3,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23648197 (241828ZSEP25) Notable: ‘Good to chat’: Albanese’s Trump meeting is finally secured – (Video) Anthony Albanese has finally secured his first White House meeting with Donald Trump for October 20, after months of speculation over a diplomatic snub. The breakthrough followed a brief exchange at Trump’s UN reception, where the Prime Minister posted a smiling selfie captioned “Good to chat with President Donald Trump.” The meeting relieves pressure on both Albanese and ambassador Kevin Rudd, whose influence had been questioned, but comes after a 270-day delay – unusually long for allies. It also follows Trump’s UN speech attacking climate action and Palestine recognition, exposing deep policy divides with Canberra. Analysts say the meeting remains a win for Albanese, though differences on climate, migration and trade may test relations between the pragmatic Labor leader and the volatile US president.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122253

>>122278

>>122294

>>122298

‘Good to chat’: Albanese’s Trump meeting is finally secured

Matthew Knott - September 24, 2025

1/2

Well, that’s a relief: Australia may not be a high priority for Donald Trump, but neither are we in the diplomatic deep freezer.

Just as Anthony Albanese’s failure to secure his first meeting with Trump was beginning to become politically damaging, the prime minister has locked in a White House visit next month. This is a victory for Albanese, even if it means he will have to schlep back to the United States for the third time this year.

The fact the meeting was being organised behind the scenes helps explain why the Prime Minister has appeared so laid-back in New York this week, despite mounting criticism about his failure to score any face time with Trump eight months into his second presidency.

Albanese certainly looks happy in the selfie he posted to Instagram on Wednesday afternoon, Australia time, which showed him beaming next to Trump after a brief conversation at the president’s welcome reception of world leaders attending the United Nations General Assembly.

“Good to chat with President Donald Trump at US welcome reception for world leaders attending United Nations General Assembly hosted by @potus and @flotus,” Albanese noted in the caption.

It’s also a win for United States ambassador Kevin Rudd, who was facing increasing scrutiny about his access to the White House. Rudd looked like the cat that swallowed the King Island double cream at an appearance alongside Albanese in New York after the meeting was confirmed, declaring he was “delighted” by the development.

While stories about Albanese being “snubbed” will now subside, the 270 odd days between Trump’s inauguration and the date of the pair’s first bilateral meeting remains far longer than normal. The lag matters because it symbolises a deeper truth about the anaemic state of the US-Australia alliance since Trump’s return to office.

There have been several signs that our most important ally views Australia as something of an afterthought: the lack of a US ambassador in Canberra; the Pentagon’s review into AUKUS; and US officials dismissing Defence Minister Richard Marles’ latest meeting with counterpart Peter Hegseth as a “happenstance encounter”.

Far beyond problems with logistics, the ideological chasm between the Trump administration and Albanese government helps explain why a leaders’ meeting has taken so long to arrange. Trump’s almost hour-long speech to the United Nations General Assembly on Wednesday, New York time, was a vivid reminder of the extreme, unorthodox and often downright bizarre president Albanese will encounter on October 20.

The speech was vintage Trump, packed with hyperbolic boasts about bringing peace to the world and humorous complaints about a dodgy teleprompter, malfunctioning escalator and lack of marble floors at UN headquarters. When it came to the substance of Trump’s address, the lack of common ground with Albanese’s world view was striking.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122301

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23651530 (251210ZSEP25) Notable: Video: Albanese’s tilt for a seat on UN Security Council to take years and millions to land – Anthony Albanese has launched Australia’s bid for a 2029-30 seat on the UN Security Council, warning the body risks becoming “a final resting place for good intentions” without reform. The Coalition backed the move, calling it a chance to advocate on wars in Gaza and Ukraine and to counter Chinese and Russian interference. Albanese’s UN speech, which contrasted sharply with Donald Trump’s climate denialism, framed climate change as an “existential threat” to Pacific nations and called for renewed global diplomacy. Analysts said the campaign would take years, cost well over $25 million, and likely centre on Australia’s Pacific partnerships.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122253

>>122294

>>122298

>>122300

Albanese’s tilt for a seat on UN Security Council to take years and millions to land

Matthew Knott and James Massola - September 25, 2025

1/2

Australia’s latest bid to secure a seat at the United Nation’s top diplomatic table will take years and cost millions of dollars, as Prime Minister Anthony Albanese seeks to elevate the country’s role in global affairs.

The Coalition has thrown its support behind the push to win a seat on the UN Security Council in a rare display of bipartisanship, arguing Australia could use it to advocate on “urgent international issues impacting Australia’s national interest”, including the wars in Ukraine and Gaza and to call out Chinese and Russian foreign interference.

While China, France, Russia, the United Kingdom, and the United States are all permanent members of the UN Security Council, obtaining one of the 10 extra seats on the high-powered committee enhances a nation’s diplomatic clout.

Australia was last on the council in 2013-14, which allowed then-foreign minister Julie Bishop to help lead the campaign for justice for the 298 people, including 39 Australians, killed when Russian-aligned forces shot down Malaysian Airlines flight MH17 over Ukraine.

That security council seat had cost at least $25 million for lobbying and promotion and years of diplomatic work, and Australian National University international law professor Donald Rothwell said this next bid would likely cost a lot more.

In his first address to the United Nations General Assembly on Thursday morning, AEST, Albanese warned that the world’s premier multilateral body risks becoming “little more than a final resting place for good intentions” without reform, as he signalled Australia wants a more prominent role in global diplomacy.

“The United Nations is much more than an arena for the great powers to veto each other’s ambitions,” he said. “This is a platform for middle powers and small nations to voice – and achieve – our aspirations. That is why Australia is seeking a place on the UN Security Council in 2029-30.”

The prime minister, who will return to the US next month for his first bilateral meeting with US President Donald Trump at the White House on October 20, distanced himself from the president’s climate denialism in a speech that warned dictators would be able to dominate world affairs and wars would proliferate across the globe unless the United Nations overhauled the way it operates.

His speech described climate change as an “existential threat” to Australia’s Pacific neighbours and projected a strikingly different worldview to Trump, who used his address a day earlier to ridicule climate change as a “con job” and disparage renewable energy.

“Australia is acting to meet the environmental challenge of climate change while working to seize and share the economic opportunities of renewable energy,” Albanese said, adding “if the United Nations steps back, we all lose ground.”

“If we resign ourselves to the idea that war is inevitable, or relegate ourselves to the status of disinterested bystanders, if our only response to every crisis is to insist that there is nothing we can do, then we risk being trusted with nothing.

“We risk a world where dialogue and diplomacy are viewed as a dead end, rather than the vital road to understanding.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122302

File: b0f709b46022d6d⋯.jpg (249.07 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 4e7f63aa9fa14e9⋯.jpg (301.4 KB,750x713,750:713,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 3a025f19bfe2c72⋯.jpg (1.47 MB,4000x2667,4000:2667,Clipboard.jpg)

File: bc699a1f037ee7f⋯.jpg (1.56 MB,4000x2667,4000:2667,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23651605 (251229ZSEP25) Notable: Kevin Rudd hugs Donald Trump’s nemesis Gavin Newsom, as Albanese locks in White House date – Anthony Albanese has confirmed his first Oval Office meeting with Donald Trump for October 20 after the pair shared a brief handshake and selfie in New York. The meeting follows months of speculation about ambassador Kevin Rudd’s access to the White House — concerns reignited when Rudd was photographed hugging California Governor Gavin Newsom, Trump’s chief Democratic rival. Rudd and Climate Minister Chris Bowen met Newsom to discuss clean-energy cooperation as Albanese brushed off Trump’s UN tirade against renewables, saying Australia would “seize the opportunities” of climate action. The upcoming meeting is expected to settle questions over AUKUS, tariffs, and defence spending.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122253

>>122294

>>122298

>>122300

>>122301

Kevin Rudd hugs Donald Trump’s nemesis Gavin Newsom, as Anthony Albanese locks in White House date

GEOFF CHAMBERS and JOE KELLY - September 24, 2025

1/2

Anthony Albanese and Donald Trump have locked in a long-awaited Oval Office meeting and shaken hands for the first time, as US ambassador Kevin Rudd embraced and held talks with the President’s political arch rival Gavin Newsom.

The Prime Minister’s bilateral meeting at the White House on October 20 was revealed before Mr Albanese took a beaming selfie with the US President.

After taking the selfie, Mr Albanese on Thursday (AEST) was tight-lipped about his brief encounter with Mr Trump.

“We had a very warm and engaging chat. I tend not to broadcast private discussions but it was very warm. And we look forward to a further discussion in a few weeks’ time,” Mr Albanese said.

The face-to-face encounter between Mr Albanese and Mr Trump came hours after the President gave a scorching address to the UN labelling “falsely-named” renewables a “joke”, and warning “all green is bankrupt”.

Earlier in the day, Mr Newsom – the powerful California governor and a 2028 presidential frontrunner for the Democrats – sat down with Dr Rudd and Energy Minister Chris Bowen to discuss green energy rollouts in Australia and California.

Social media photos and a video posted by Mr Newsom, who will end his tenure as California Governor before next year’s US midterm elections due to term limits, show the prominent climate change supporter hugging Dr Rudd and interacting warmly with Mr Bowen.

Mr Newsom has replaced Joe Biden and Hillary Clinton as the Democrat who Mr Trump devotes most of his time to attacking. The California governor is just ahead of the President’s vanquished 2024 opponent, Kamala Harris, in the aggregate of polls for the 2028 Democratic presidential nomination.

The engagement with Mr Newsom emerged on the same day that Mr Albanese briefly met Mr Trump for the first time at a UN General Assembly welcome reception in New York, hosted by the US President and First Lady Melania Trump.

Asked if he would meet with Mr Newsom, who is speaking at the same New York Times climate change conference as the Prime Minister, Mr Albanese said he wouldn’t be because he had “a pretty full card” and stated that he previously met the California Governor in San Francisco.

On whether Australia would join France and be involved in a stabilisation peacekeeping force in Gaza following a ceasefire, Mr Albanese said his government would “give consideration to that at an appropriate time”.

In addition to a ceasefire, the release of all hostages and providing access for aid, Mr Albanese – who announced this week that Australia supports Palestinian recognition - said “we want to deal with the long-term solution that is required”.

Pressed on whether he would lift defence spending given Mr Trump’s administration is demanding Australia lift its commitment to 3.5 per cent of GDP, Mr Albanese said “we’ll continue to monitor and examine what capability Australia needs”.

“We have increased our spending now by around about $70bn compared with what we inherited.”

Mr Albanese earlier sat in the UN General Assembly hall as Mr Trump used a 57-minute address to criticise the UN for being weak and warn that a “double-tailed monster” of immigration and green energy was destroying the free world.

Mr Albanese’s week in New York for his first UNGA as Prime Minister has focused heavily on Palestinian recognition, climate change and clean energy – issues attacked by Mr Trump in his first UN speech since 2020.

After Australia and the US went more than 10 months without a leader-to-leader meeting since Mr Trump’s election victory, Dr Rudd on Wednesday revealed the Labor leader would travel to the US for a third time since June for a White House appointment.

“We were delighted to have the White House confirm … that the PM will be back in the United States on the 20th of October to meet with the President of the United States in Washington DC. This relationship will go from strength to strength,” Dr Rudd said at an event for US bankers and investors held at the Macquarie Group’s New York headquarters.

Around the same time as Dr Rudd’s announcement, Mr Newsom published posts on social media, including a photo of the former prime minister hugging him.

“Grateful to (Kevin Rudd) and Climate & Energy Minister Chris Bowen for strengthening our clean energy partnership and advancing a sustainable future for California and Australia,” Mr Newsom posted on his official Californian Governor X account.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122303

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23651634 (251242ZSEP25) Notable: ‘We are inspired’: European leaders back Australia’s under-16 social media ban – (Video) European Commission president Ursula von der Leyen has praised Australia’s world-first ban on under-16s using social media as “a bold decision” and pledged to study its impact. Speaking at an event hosted by Anthony Albanese at UN headquarters, von der Leyen said Europe was “inspired by Australia’s example” and that limiting children’s online access was “plain common sense”. Leaders from Greece, Malta, Fiji and Tonga also voiced support. Albanese said the law would ease the “tug-of-war between real life and endless scrolling”. He also said Australia would consider joining postwar peacekeeping missions in Gaza or Ukraine.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122249

‘We are inspired’: European leaders back Australia’s under-16 social media ban

Matthew Knott - September 25, 2025

1/2

European leaders have hailed Australia’s world-first move to limit young people’s access to social media, as Prime Minister Anthony Albanese says he will consider ways that Australia could contribute to an international peacekeeping mission in postwar Gaza.

On the last day of his visit to New York for the United Nations General Assembly, Albanese hosted an event at UN headquarters to promote Australia’s ban on children aged under 16 from operating social media accounts and to discuss other ways to prevent young people from being harmed by online bullying and radicalisation.

European Commission president Ursula von der Leyen praised Australia for the “bold decision” to seek to regulate children’s access to social media, hailing it as “an example of what determined countries can do”.

“Since the announcement of Australia’s landmark minimum age law, I’ve been watching very closely, and I’ve been inspired by Australia’s example,” the European Union’s top official told the event as she credited Albanese for staring down opposition from tech giants such as Meta, which owns Facebook and Instagram.

“We in Europe are watching and will be learning from you as you implement your world first and world-leading social media ban.”

Speaking as a mother and grandmother, von der Leyen said she believed it was “plain common sense” to limit children’s access to social media and announced that she would assemble a panel of experts to study the issue.

“Our next generation needs us to step up to be daring and to give this a go,” she said.

Many EU member states are already keen to follow Australia’s example, she said.

The event was attended by leaders from Greece, Malta, Fiji and Tonga as well as dignitaries from the Philippines, Bulgaria and Kazakhstan.

The Australian ban on Australians operating social media accounts will come into effect on December 10.

Bathurst mother Emma Mason, whose 15-year-old daughter Tilly took her own life after being relentlessly bullied by classmates on social media, received a standing ovation for a speech describing how she had turned tragedy into a determination to create policy change.

“After Tilly died, I knew I needed to do something to protect the other Tillys,” Mason said.

“I implore leaders and nations of our great world to act, and act now.

“Making it illegal for children to access social media under 16 will improve lives. It will save lives. It was once said that all it takes for evil to flourish is for good people to do nothing. So it’s time to do something.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122304

File: 63444dc54b346d8⋯.jpg (680.84 KB,2048x1366,1024:683,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 21481aeea4cb779⋯.jpg (1021.34 KB,5735x3823,5735:3823,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23651662 (251248ZSEP25) Notable: Elon Musk’s X says social media ban will violate human rights – Elon Musk’s company X has accused the Albanese government of breaching children’s rights by restricting free speech and access to information, as it seeks a six-month delay to Australia’s under-16 social media ban. In a Senate submission, X said the policy risked “regulatory weaponisation” and violated international treaties such as the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child. Communications Minister Anika Wells rejected the claims, saying the law protects children from “mental harms” caused by early exposure to social media. Opposition spokesperson Melissa McIntosh called the rollout “chaotic” and confusing.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122249

>>122303

Elon Musk’s X says social media ban will violate human rights

Nick Newling - September 25, 2025

Elon Musk’s company X has accused the Albanese government of undermining children’s rights by curbing their free speech and access to information as the social media site seeks a delay of at least six months to Australia’s social media ban for under-16s.

US President Donald Trump has had a tumultuous relationship with Musk, who was one of his closest confidants in the early months of his presidency, and has vowed to impose tariffs or export restrictions on foreign nations that try to regulate American tech firms.

In a submission to an Australian Senate inquiry, X said less than one per cent of its Australian users were under 16, and argued its content moderation teams — which were dramatically cut following Musk’s 2022 aquisition of the service then named Twitter — could protect young people.

The world-first ban, which covers sites such as TikTok, Instagram and Facebook comes into effect on December 10, and could be expanded to dating and gaming sites including Lego Play, Reddit, Tinder and Hinge after the eSafety Commissioner requested their operators check if they were covered by the law.

But X, which has repeatedly tangled with the eSafety Commissioner over attempts to rein it in, argued the listing of platforms based on ministerial discretion posed “significant risk of regulatory weaponisation” and posed a “major threat to freedom of information, speech, and access to the internet”.

“We have serious concerns as to the lawfulness of the social media minimum age, including its compatibility with other regulations and laws, including international human rights treaties to which Australia is a signatory,” X’s submission reads, naming the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child.

The platform requested the start of the ban be delayed at least six months with a grace period for engineering changes. It said children would evade the laws and that giving parents greater controls over their children’s use of social sites would work better than a ban.

Speaking from New York on Thursday morning, Communications Minister Anika Wells said X’s claims were wrong because the government was acting to support children’s wellbeing, which was also protected by international agreements.

“There is so much evidence in now about particularly the mental harms that are afflicted to children by being exposed to social media too young,” Wells told Nine’s Today.

Wells said she was meeting with and “eyeballing” tech platforms while in the United States and would communicate the government’s expectations before the December 10 deadline. The minister did not say who she had met, but told Nine’s Today that she had not scheduled a meeting with Elon Musk

“These are pioneering, innovating, some of the richest companies in the world. They transact a lot of business and they make a lot of revenue off Australians here on our shore, and I think it’s reasonable to ask them to use some of that tech and some of that revenue to look after our kids online,” Wells said.

Opposition communications spokesperson Melissa McIntosh was critical of Wells’ travel to the United States, which she described as “a PR tour”, during the ongoing fallout of the deadly Optus network outage and new developments on the social media ban.

“Australian parents and children are still left wondering how these changes will be implemented and which platforms will be included … this chaotic and scatter gun approach as to which platforms are in or out is just creating more confusion for Australian families,” McIntosh said.

Trump posted on his own platform Truth Social in August, saying: “I will stand up to countries that attack our incredible American tech companies. Unless these discriminatory actions are removed, I, as president of the United States, will impose substantial additional tariffs on that country’s exports to the USA, and institute export restrictions on our highly protected technology and chips.”

After a months-long feud following Musk’s departure as the head of the Department of Government Efficiency, the billionaire met with Trump at a memorial service for assassinated conservative activist Charlie Kirk this week.

Lego Play and Reddit have been contacted. Tinder declined to comment.

Communications Minister Anika Wells said gaming and messaging apps would not fall under the ban, but it was incumbent on platforms to demonstrate to the eSafety Commissioner that they were not harbouring harmful behaviour.

https://www.theage.com.au/politics/federal/elon-musk-s-x-says-social-media-ban-will-violate-human-rights-20250925-p5mxrg.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122305

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23657234 (261425ZSEP25) Notable: Ex-Trump national security adviser Bolton charged over handling of classified material – Former US national security adviser John Bolton has been charged with 18 counts under the Espionage Act for allegedly retaining and sharing top-secret records, including diary-like notes about his time in government. Prosecutors say Bolton shared over 1000 pages of classified information with relatives and failed to disclose that Iranian-linked hackers accessed his emails. He denies wrongdoing, calling the case an “intensive effort” by Donald Trump to “intimidate his opponents.” The charges carry potential sentences of up to 10 years per count and follow similar indictments against other Trump critics, deepening concern over politicisation of the Justice Department.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Ex-FBI chief James Comey criminally charged as Trump targets critics

Kanishka Singh - September 26, 2025

1/2

Washington: The US Justice Department has filed criminal charges against former FBI director James Comey, in a dramatic escalation of US President Donald Trump’s retribution campaign against his political enemies.

If convicted, Comey could face up to five years in prison. He faces charges of making false statements and obstructing a congressional investigation.

Comey, in a video posted on Instagram, said: “My heart is broken for the Department of Justice, but I have great confidence in the federal judicial system, and I’m innocent. So, let’s have a trial and keep the faith.”

His attorney, Patrick J. Fitzgerald, said in a statement: “Jim Comey denies the charges filed today in their entirety. We look forward to vindicating him in the courtroom.”

Trump has threatened to imprison his political rivals since he first ran for president in 2015, but Comey’s indictment marks the first time his administration has succeeded in securing a grand jury indictment against one of them. Trump’s Justice Department is also investigating other antagonists, including New York Attorney-General Letitia James and John Bolton, who served as a national security official in Trump’s first term as president.

The charges breach decades-long norms that have sought to insulate US law enforcement from political pressures.

The federal prosecutor in Virginia who had been tasked with pursuing the case resigned last week after drawing Trump’s wrath for expressing doubts about the case, and others in the office have privately said the evidence does not merit criminal charges, according to sources familiar with the matter.

Trump, who has pressured Attorney-General Pam Bondi to prosecute Comey and other critics, celebrated the news. “JUSTICE IN AMERICA!” he wrote on social media. “He has been so bad for our Country, for so long.”

Trump fired Comey in 2017, early in his first term in office. He has since regularly assailed Comey’s handling of the FBI investigation that detailed contacts between Russians and Trump’s 2016 campaign.

Since Trump returned to office last January, his Justice Department has been examining Comey’s 2020 testimony when he addressed Republican criticisms of the Russia investigation and denied that he had authorised disclosures of sensitive information to the news media.

The indictment alleges that Comey misled Congress by claiming he had not authorised anyone else to be an anonymous source in news reporting about an FBI investigation.

Trump’s administration has carried out a sweeping campaign to remake the Justice Department, which the president alleges was used as a political weapon when he left office in 2021. Trump faced federal charges of mishandling classified documents and trying to overturn his 2020 election defeat. Both cases have been dropped.

“Donald Trump has ordered the criminal prosecutions of political targets, and the Department of Justice is corruptly obeying,” said Norm Eisen, a prominent former government ethics official under Democratic president Barack Obama and currently a fellow at the Brookings Institution. “This indictment has all the hallmarks of a vindictive and meritless prosecution.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122306

File: 08ab5650498a430⋯.jpg (256.68 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 51bb86a7ac1ca31⋯.jpg (259.21 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: aab361ff6ebffd5⋯.jpg (273.52 KB,814x428,407:214,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23665639 (280833ZSEP25) Notable: Australia may get carve out from pharma tariffs, Health Minister says – Health Minister Mark Butler says it is “not entirely clear” whether Australian blood and plasma exports will be hit by US President Donald Trump’s new 100 per cent tariff on foreign-made pharmaceuticals, suggesting an exemption is likely. Butler noted Trump’s assurance that companies investing in US facilities would be spared and said Australia’s major plasma exporter already operates and is expanding there. He conceded, however, that some medicine exporters could still be affected. The Coalition accused Prime Minister Anthony Albanese of failing to protect Australian jobs, claiming “the relationship in Washington is not strong.” Albanese downplayed the tension, calling his brief encounter with Trump “very warm.”

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109278 (pb)

>>109279 (pb)

>>109280 (pb)

Australia may get carve out from pharma tariffs, Health Minister says

JOSEPH OLBRYCHT-PALMER - 28 September 2025

1/2

Health Minister Mark Butler says it is “not entirely clear” if Australian blood and plasma products will be hit with Donald Trump’s eye-watering 100 per cent tariff on pharmaceuticals.

The US President this week confirmed he would follow through with his pledge to levy foreign-made pharmaceuticals after first threatening action in July.

Australian pharmaceutical exports to the US were worth north of $2bn in 2024.

But Mr Butler on Sunday played down concerns, pointing out that Mr Trump himself said there would be exemptions.

“The vast bulk of our exports to the US are actually blood and plasma products, so it’s not entirely clear whether they are captured by the scope of the announcement the President made a few days ago,” Mr Butler told Sky News.

“Also, the President said there would be exemptions from those very high tariffs of 100 per cent if a company was involved in capital investment in the US.

“And the major exporter of our blood and plasma products is in the process of building even more facilities in the US than they already operate there, with many, many thousands of employees … in the United States undertaking that blood and plasma products work.”

Indeed, when Mr Trump announced the new tariff he said companies that were building facilities in the US would be exempt.

He clarified that building meant “breaking ground” or actively “under construction”.

While Mr Butler said he was confident of an Australian exemption for blood and plasma, he added Mr Trump’s move was “certainly not nothing” and that there “are some medicine exporters that may be captured by these tariffs”.

“The US is an important first market … for start up medicine companies, because getting access to (Food and Drug Administration) approval is terrifically important in terms of global exposure to for a new medicine,” Mr Butler said.

“But we are trying to understand this impact a little bit more.

“We do think that there’s a very high likelihood the major exporter that accounts for the vast bulk of our exports to the US will not be captured by this new announcement, either because of the nature of their product or because of the capital investment they’re undertaking right now in the US.”

Mr Trump unveiled the new tariff in a social media post on Friday (AEST).

“Starting October 1st, 2025, we will be imposing a 100% Tariff on any branded or patented Pharmaceutical Product, unless a Company IS BUILDING their Pharmaceutical Manufacturing Plant in America,” he wrote.

“IS BUILDING will be defined as, ‘breaking ground’ and/or ‘under construction’.

“There will, therefore, be no Tariff on these Pharmaceutical Products if construction has started.

“Thank you for your attention to this matter!”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122307

File: 4e4a9adac99fe81⋯.mp4 (7.11 MB,960x540,16:9,Clipboard.mp4)

File: 6934fddd8f70e12⋯.jpg (295.8 KB,1181x728,1181:728,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 673ed90015177ca⋯.jpg (169.68 KB,1179x732,393:244,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23665651 (280847ZSEP25) Notable: Video: Vanuatu plans to sign police deal with China while Nakamal pact with Australia is left hanging – Vanuatu has announced plans to finalise a new policing agreement with China after its landmark $500 million Nakamal Security Agreement with Australia was left unsigned. Police Minister Andrew Napuat met Chinese counterpart Wang Xiaohong in Beijing, where Beijing pledged $700,000 in police equipment, including drones, motorcycles and INTERPOL systems. Mr Napuat said China’s support addressed “security issues relating to climate change, transnational crime, cybercrime” rather than militarisation. He denied any link between the Chinese deal and the stalled Australian pact, insisting Vanuatu was “not a proxy in a geopolitical game” and would “continue to exercise its sovereignty”.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122199

>>122200

>>122268

>>122248

>>122219

Vanuatu plans to sign police deal with China while Nakamal pact with Australia is left hanging

Stephen Dziedzic and Lillyrose Welwel - 23 September 2025

1/2

Vanuatu has declared it will sign a new policing agreement with China as the landmark Nakamal pact between Australia and the Pacific Island nation hangs in the balance.

Vanuatu's Police Minister Andrew Napuat met with China's Minister of Public Security Wang Xiaohong in Beijing last Friday, less than two weeks after Anthony Albanese departed Port Vila with the $500 million Nakamal Agreement left unsigned.

Beijing has already stepped up its police equipment donations to Vanuatu.

Meanwhile, its police training teams have been playing an increasingly visible role, with Chinese officers recently making their first visit to the island of Malekula.

Mr Napat told media in Vanuatu that China had now agreed to hand over another 20 police motorcycles, 20 drones and other equipment. That includes INTERPOL systems used by police to communicate internationally.

Vanuatu media reported that the total equipment donation was worth about $700,000 — a fraction of the amount Australia gives to Vanuatu for security assistance — but the Police Minister said China was helping Vanuatu deal with its key security priorities.

It was not the "full militarisation of its forces" but "rather on security issues relating to climate change, transnational crime, cybercrime, traffic management, and general policing duties and functions".

"Vanuatu has already established Memorandum of Understanding [MoU] and Cooperation Agreements on policing with Australia, New Zealand, France, the United Kingdom [UK], and PNG, while China is the only country with which we still need to formalise a MoU," he said.

"Our two governments wish to formalise a Police MoU similar to existing MoUs … to better coordinate and manage different areas of partnership in the policing sector with all of our partners."

In a statement issued late last week China said the Wang Xiaohong and Andrew Napuat had agreed to "strengthen exchanges at all levels, work together to enhance their law enforcement capabilities and strengthen cooperation in cracking down on transnational crimes such as fugitive repatriation and asset recovery, so as to advance the China-Vanuatu comprehensive strategic partnership".

The announcement is likely to cause consternation in Canberra.

It has been working on a range of agreements designed to bolster Australia's strategic position in the Pacific and stop China from making further inroads into the policing and security sectors in the region.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122308

File: efe6b4f86fdd80d⋯.jpg (153.42 KB,1280x720,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 886f5d3e3361e5e⋯.jpg (65.9 KB,1200x675,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: a6c406881bfb7c3⋯.jpg (234.18 KB,1264x838,632:419,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 6e7d3d51c8f9002⋯.jpg (270.12 KB,1264x788,316:197,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 615e94957cb48c8⋯.jpg (316.91 KB,1264x788,316:197,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23665667 (280901ZSEP25) Notable: Australia cops it over Vanuatu's police deal with China – Vanuatu’s Police Minister Andrew Napuat has lashed out at Australia’s Pacific Minister Pat Conroy, telling him to “check his facts” after Conroy downplayed Port Vila’s plan to formalise a policing memorandum with China. Mr Napuat accused Australia of “arrogance and ignorance”, saying Vanuatu’s decisions were made “collectively as a government” and should be respected. He said the planned deal would clarify China’s policing role without establishing a permanent presence. Canberra maintains that Pacific security should remain within the “Pacific family” as it pursues its own stalled $500 million Nakamal pact, which includes provisions effectively limiting Chinese involvement.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122199

>>122200

>>122248

>>122219

>>122307

Australia cops it over Vanuatu's police deal with China

Dominic Giannini - September 26 2025

Australia's Pacific minister has been chastised by a Vanuatu counterpart, being told to "check his facts" over comments about a Chinese policing agreement.

Vanuatu's Police Minister Andrew Napuat stirred ructions in Canberra after flagging Port Vila was chasing a memorandum of understanding with China about policing after he visited Beijing.

Pacific Minister Pat Conroy played down Mr Napuat's comments, saying they were from "one particular minister weren't a surprise" as Australia tries to finalise its own security agreement.

Mr Conroy said he respected the sovereignty of Vanuatu, adding the desire to formalise a small Chinese policing presence wasn't a surprise to Australia.

Mr Napuat has hit back at Mr Conroy's comments.

"These are the kind of comments that are made by our friends that shows the arrogance and ignorance of what we are stating as a government," he told ABC Radio.

"He needs to respect the internal processes that are happening here, and then he needs to get his facts correct, to understand that what we are deciding on as a government.

"The decisions that we are making is not a decision that comes from a single minister. It is a decision that we are making collectively as a government."

Sources familiar with the situation, but unable to speak publicly because of diplomatic sensitivities, said the comments were taken out of context and Mr Conroy didn't single out the minister or imply he was at odds with his government.

Mr Napuat said a memorandum with China was needed to map out the rules of engagement with local police forces, although no timeline has been attached.

Beijing already had a policing presence on the ground but the memorandum wasn't "normalising some kind of permanent presence whatsoever", Mr Napuat said.

"We're saying it will provide clarity on what certain partners are doing with us, how we are addressing the needs of the Vanuatu police force with our different partners."

Vanuatu had also been upfront with Australia about signing a memorandum, he said.

Australia has stated there is no role for a Chinese security presence in the Pacific, saying such issues can be resolved by a regional response.

It continues to sign and pursue pacts with Pacific nations that effectively include veto or exclusivity clauses preventing China from co-operating in the security and critical infrastructure spaces.

The $500 million Nakamal agreement with Vanuatu fell over at the last minute over concerns it would block other countries providing development funding.

Australia remains confident an agreement will be reached, and while the text hasn't been made public, there's believed to be a significant security element to the deal.

Similar Australian agreements with Nauru and Papua New Guinea effectively lock China out.

https://www.canberratimes.com.au/story/9075538/australia-cops-it-over-vanuatus-police-deal-with-china/

https://www.facebook.com/chineseembassyinvanuatu/posts/828769289830347

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122309

File: 14916f596677d07⋯.jpg (304.56 KB,1280x720,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 7d59937c0ead4f4⋯.jpg (149.26 KB,1400x768,175:96,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 4a3c6f847625ee9⋯.jpg (126.14 KB,1280x959,1280:959,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 47e51b0198344db⋯.jpg (520.45 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23665687 (280921ZSEP25) Notable: Donald Day Jr, US conspiracy theorist connected to Wieambilla killers, agrees to watered-down plea deal – Arizona-based conspiracy theorist Donald Day Jr, who praised the 2022 Wieambilla police killers, has reached a plea deal to admit possessing firearms as a convicted felon, while prosecutors drop three other charges including threats against US police. Day, known online as “Geronimo’s Bones,” had called Gareth and Stacey Train his “brave brother and sister” after they murdered Queensland officers Matthew Arnold and Rachel McCrow and neighbour Alan Dare. Court filings list 34 weapons — including rifles, pistols, a revolver, and large quantities of ammunition — stored in a mobile home “gun room.” The plea limits punishment to the low end of sentencing ranges, pending court approval.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109588 (pb)

>>122153

>>122185

>>122186

>>122193

Search widens: Dezi Freeman called ‘prepper’ whose bush knowledge stretches far from original police hunt zone

JOHN FERGUSON - September 26, 2025

Victoria Police have been hunting for alleged police killer Dezi Freeman over a far broader area in and on the edge of alpine bush country than first thought amid revelations the ‘’doomsday prepper” had lived near other possible hiding places well away from the original search area.

Police have searched a property at Rose River, well away from Porepunkah in northeastern Victoria, where he had worked as a volunteer on an organic farm, ­living in his car as a younger man for several months.

Rose River is directly near the southwestern boundary of Mount Buffalo National Park and could be accessible from the Porepunkah side by road or bush-bashing, although any cross-country trek would be extremely challenging.

Members of the Victoria Police Critical Incident Response Team searched the property about two weeks ago after the connection was made but its owner, Thomas Moritz, has had only limited contact with the alleged killer after his behaviour deteriorated about a decade ago and worsened during the pandemic.

Mr Moritz told The Weekend Australian that Freeman, now 56, had lived in other areas in the region as well in what now looks like a semi-nomadic life complicated by his inability to hold down a long-term job.

Mr Moritz said Freeman was not a so-called sovereign citizen, rather someone who might have been preparing for a doomsday scenario.

“He was more a doomsday prepper,’’ he said. “He was preparing for the apocalypse.’’

He said the deaths of the two policeman and the injuring of a third were an “absolute tragedy” and that more than a decade ago Freeman had started to fray around the edges, despite being a talented photographer and being married to a well-respected woman, Mali Freeman, who teaches music.

Rose River is, in a broadly straight line, between 25km and 40km from where the police were shot dead, depending on the cross-country path that might be taken. There are roads and trails that make a walk distinctly possible especially by someone with excellent bush skills.

Police have no idea exactly where Freeman is but have focused most of their attention on the bush around his former home, below the Mount Buffalo peaks, on the Porepunkah side, about 300km northeast of Melbourne.

Mr Moritz said that Freeman’s deep distrust of police meant he believed the alleged killer would still be in the area originally searched by police. He believed it was unlikely someone was harbouring him because he wouldn’t trust anybody enough.

“He would have been preparing for the apocalypse,’’ he said.

Footage has emerged of the August 26 raid on Freeman’s bus where he allegedly shot dead Leading Senior Constable Neal Thompson, 59, and Senior Constable Vadim de Waart-­Hottart, 34. A third officer was also seriously injured.

The video, apparently taken by a Freeman family member, suggests the police were at his bus with a warrant connected to alleged sex abuse allegations.

“Tell your goons to stop breaking the door,’’ he said. “This is domestic terrorism. Why did you join the police? So you can terrorise families?’’

The killings have provoked one of the biggest searches of its kind in Australia, with elite special operations forces chasing the alleged killer through the bush at the foot of alpine country.

Freeman “worked” as a volunteer under the World Wide Opportunities on Organic Farms scheme, where people receive housing and board in exchange for work on properties. They are often known as WWOOFers.

He had transitioned to a disability pension but was also working on the Porepunkah property near where he came into conflict with police.

Freeman has high-level bush skills and was armed when he fled from the crime scene. Police believe there are several possible options for what has happened to Freeman.

One is that he has killed himself, another is that he is living off the grid and using supplies he had placed in the bush in the event of him falling foul of the law.

The other is that he managed to flee the area with the help of someone else, or is being hidden. Despite scores of raids, they have found no evidence of him being protected by friends.

Former detective Charlie Bezzina said there were myriad possibilities of where Freeman could be but that police would be very focused on finding him.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/search-widens-dezi-freeman-called-prepper-whose-bush-knowledge-stretches-far-from-original-police-hunt-zone/news-story/f20eb767f0a5faa34fb5ed6e5de20f25

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122310

File: 59b7f37d5da1e47⋯.jpg (232.75 KB,1600x1067,1600:1067,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23665705 (280937ZSEP25) Notable: Official White House photograph enshrines moment Anthony Albanese first met Donald Trump – An official White House photograph has captured Prime Minister Anthony Albanese’s first in-person meeting with US President Donald Trump, both smiling broadly as Mr Trump gives a thumbs-up alongside Jodie Haydon and Melania Trump. The photo was taken three days after the pair met at the UN General Assembly Welcome Reception in New York. Mr Albanese also met UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer and Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney in London ahead of his upcoming White House visit, following earlier talks with Spain’s Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122300

>>122302

Official White House photograph enshrines moment Anthony Albanese first met Donald Trump

GEOFF CHAMBERS - September 27, 2025

The moment Anthony Albanese first met Donald Trump in-person has been enshrined in an official White House photograph, with the two men captured sporting broad grins and the US President giving a thumbs-up standing alongside Jodie Haydon and Melania Trump.

Three days after the Prime Minister and US President met briefly at the United Nations General Assembly Welcome Reception hosted by Mr Trump and the First Lady, the official photograph of the leaders and their spouses was released on Saturday (AEST).

Mr Albanese had previously released a selfie of him and Mr Trump at the reception, which was held at the Lotte New York Palace Hotel. Before the reception, Ms Haydon participated in Mrs Trump’s Fostering the Future Reception in New York.

With just over three weeks until Mr Trump hosts Mr Albanese at the White House for a long-awaited bilateral meeting, the Labor leader dropped by 10 Downing Street on Saturday for drinks with British Prime Minister Keir Starmer and Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney – two leaders who have had plenty of face-time and interactions with the Republican billionaire.

Earlier in the day, Mr Albanese sat down with Spanish left-wing Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez, who famously clashed with Mr Trump after refusing to accept the US President’s demand that all NATO countries commit to defence spending of 5 per cent of GDP.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/official-white-house-photograph-enshrines-moment-anthony-albanese-first-met-donald-trump/news-story/0fe596b8cd8a1102c91788924a182f3c

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122311

File: 8814320da818de3⋯.jpg (214.43 KB,1280x853,1280:853,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 2d1b63cb2e9f410⋯.jpg (1.63 MB,3729x2486,3:2,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 56599c5c663dc90⋯.jpg (199.53 KB,1341x894,3:2,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 7faa82cef39521f⋯.jpg (365.21 KB,1280x848,80:53,Clipboard.jpg)

File: f0c5a28660c21bd⋯.jpg (210.32 KB,2048x1816,256:227,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23665727 (281029ZSEP25) Notable: Anthony Albanese says Aussies are 'concerned' about far right's rise abroad, ahead of Donald Trump meeting – Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has cautioned against the global rise of populism and the far right ahead of next month’s meeting with US President Donald Trump, saying governments should “not seek to divide people”. Speaking in London after talks with British PM Keir Starmer, Mr Albanese said Australians were “concerned about elements of the far right rising in various countries”. He called on parties to “come up with solutions” rather than division, reaffirming support for the AUKUS pact and joining other centre-left leaders in pledging solidarity against populist movements.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122300

>>122310

>>122310

Anthony Albanese says Aussies are 'concerned' about far right's rise abroad, ahead of Donald Trump meeting

Riley Stuart - 27 September 2025

Anthony Albanese has warned against the rise of populism and the far right ahead of his in-person meeting with Donald Trump next month, saying governments should "not seek to divide people".

The Australian prime minister made the comments during a flying visit to London on Friday, local time, in which he met his British counterpart, Sir Keir Starmer, among other world leaders.

Mr Albanese arrived at Downing Street with his partner, Jodie Haydon, and brought along a four-pack of beer named in his honour, and which also bears his image.

Mr Albanese was all smiles when he snapped a quick selfie with the US president while in New York earlier this week.

But on Friday, he struck a more serious tone when asked about the rise of Reform UK, a right-wing populist party, and its leader, Nigel Farage, who has a close relationship with Mr Trump and has previously campaigned with him.

Many opinion polls have indicated a surge in support for the group in Britain, although it won just five seats out of 650 in the country's lower house of parliament at last year's general election.

"I don't want to see the rise of populist organisations such as that," Mr Albanese said, when asked about Reform on Friday.

"Parties and governments have to come up with solutions, not seek to divide people."

Mr Albanese is due to meet the US president in person in Washington, DC, on October 20.

Mr Trump's critics accuse him of stoking division in the United States and putting at risk long-standing relationships with close allies like Australia.

The US president's brand of politics and most devoted supporters - sometimes referred to collectively with the acronym MAGA - have their roots in right-wing populism.

Mr Trump and Mr Farage have similar positions on several issues, including particularly hardline immigration stances.

On Friday, Mr Albanese said people in Australia were "concerned about elements of the far right rising in various countries".

"Our job is to make sure that people continue to have faith in the system," he said.

Mr Albanese flew from New York, where he had addressed the United Nations General Assembly, to London on Thursday, local time.

On Friday morning, he took part in a panel discussion at the Global Progressive Action Conference alongside Sir Keir, Canadian PM Mark Carney and Icelandic PM Kristrún Frostadóttir.

The group of centre-left leaders, who have all won elections in the past 18 months, compared notes on their victories.

While the group did not direct their remarks at Mr Trump's MAGA movement, they did discuss how best to defeat domestic populist opponents, amidst cost-of-living crises and rising anti-immigrant sentiment.

It was a show of solidarity after Mr Trump's criticism of the UK, Australia and Canada, which all announced they would recognise Palestinian statehood - something Iceland has done since 2011.

Later on Friday, Mr Albanese held meetings with Kemi Badenoch, Britain's conservative opposition leader, and the Prime Minister of Spain, Pedro Sánchez.

Mr Albanese is due to have an audience with King Charles III on Saturday at Balmoral Castle - a royal residence in the Scottish Highlands.

On Friday, the Australian PM reaffirmed his support for the AUKUS defence partnership, which he described as being "in the interests of all three nations" involved.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-09-27/anthony-albanese-says-aussies-are-concerned-about-far-right-rise/105819050

https://x.com/AlboMP/status/1971536478670147931

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122312

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23665752 (281044ZSEP25) Notable: Video: After meeting Trump, Albanese veers left – Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has met former UK Labour leader Tony Blair and joined a major progressive summit in London with leaders including Keir Starmer, Mark Carney, Mette Frederiksen and Pedro Sanchez. The Global Progress Action Summit, featuring Trump critics and senior Democrats, aims to shape a “progressive” response to global challenges such as migration and national security. The visit follows Mr Albanese’s meeting with US President Donald Trump in New York, where he reaffirmed support for climate action, calling global warming an “existential threat” in contrast to Mr Trump’s dismissal of it as a “con job”.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122300

>>122310

>>122311

After meeting Trump, Albanese veers left

David Crowe - September 26, 2025

1/2

London: Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has met former UK Labour leader Tony Blair before a major summit in London that aims to set a course for “progressive” governments on challenges ranging from migration to social unrest and national security.

A who’s who of the political left are set to join Albanese at the gathering, which features key critics of US President Donald Trump.

Albanese and Blair met at Stoke Lodge, the Australian high commissioner’s residence in London, for private talks lasting about 30 minutes, ahead of the arrival at the conference of prime ministers including Mark Carney of Canada, Mette Frederiksen of Denmark, Pedro Sanchez of Spain and Kristrun Frostadottir of Iceland. They were due to be joined at the summit by other progressive politicians such as former New Zealand prime minister Jacinda Ardern and some of Trump’s most prominent American rivals.

In brief remarks before their talks, Blair asked Albanese about this week’s United Nations meetings in New York, and Albanese thanked Blair for his message of congratulations after this year’s federal election.

Blair, the prime minister of the UK from 1997 to 2007, swept Labour into power after years of Conservative rule by promising a “third way” for his government and aiming to hold the centre in national politics without shifting too far to the left on the economy and social policies.

But he provoked strong criticism from his own side of politics when he took Britain into the war in the Middle East alongside the US – and Australia under prime minister John Howard – in Iraq in 2003.

UK Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer is joining the summit in London with a message to fellow leaders about protecting national borders and security. This will include a policy announcement on the launch of a digital ID for all workers – seen as a way to prevent illegal workers and discourage asylum seekers from coming to the UK by boat across the English Channel.

“There is no doubt that for years, left-wing parties, including my own, did shy away from people’s concerns around illegal immigration,” Sir Keir wrote in London’s The Telegraph on Friday, ahead of the summit. “It has been too easy for people to enter the country, work in the shadow economy and remain illegally.”

His message is that the government must convince voters it stands for “patriotic national renewal” while avoiding what he calls the “toxic” policies of the populist right.

That parallels a call from Albanese earlier this year for what he termed a “progressive patriotism” that aims for social cohesion.

Albanese and his fiancee, Jodie Haydon, are expected to have a private dinner with Starmer and his wife, Victoria, as well as Carney and Frederiksen.

The conference comes days after Albanese met Trump in New York and secured formal talks to be held in Washington next month, easing months of doubt about the strength of the security alliance and the personal relationship between the leaders.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122313

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23665776 (281059ZSEP25) Notable: Video: PM lines up royal visit as he meets King Charles in Scotland – Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has invited the Prince and Princess of Wales and their three children to visit Australia after a 90-minute meeting with King Charles at Balmoral Castle. Mr Albanese, a declared republican, ruled out holding a referendum on the monarchy, calling Australia’s relationship with the Crown “very respectful”. The King, still receiving cancer treatment, discussed royal visit plans and global issues including AUKUS and Ukraine. Mr Albanese will next address the UK Labour conference in Liverpool before heading to the United Arab Emirates for trade talks, ahead of his White House meeting with President Donald Trump on October 20.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122300

>>122310

>>122311

>>122312

PM lines up royal visit as he meets King Charles in Scotland

JACQUELIN MAGNAY and GEOFF CHAMBERS - 28 September 2025

1/2

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has invited Prince William and Princess Catherine, along with their three children, on a royal visit to Australia during wide-ranging discussions with King Charles on Saturday.

Mr Albanese, a staunch republican, has also ruled out a referendum on the issue of Australia becoming a republic saying that “I have no intention of holding any referendums’’ and describing the country’s relationship with the monarchy as “very respectful”.

“It was very good of the King to invite me here to Balmoral Castle. I regard it as a great personal honour and also an honour for Australia. It is a sign of respect His Majesty is interested in Australia as well as the state of the world and it is always engaging and insightful to have discussions with him,’’ Mr Albanese told The Australian outside Crathie Kirk, the church the King regularly visits when he is in residence at Balmoral alongside Scottish locals.

The 90-minute discussion with King Charles was held, unusually, behind closed doors inside the remote castle in Aberdeenshire, with even the Prime Minister’s aides being seen outside.

King Charles continues to receive treatment for cancer and he came to Balmoral, one of his favourite residences, to recover from a busy schedule that included the lavish state banquet and visit by the United States President Donald Trump 10 days ago.

One of the key points on the King’s agenda in the fireside chat with the Prime Minister was the next visit by the royal family to Australia, but it was always unlikely that the King, with his health woes and Queen Camilla, who struggles with long-haul jet lag would return so soon after last year’s quick trip to Canberra and Sydney en route to the Commonwealth Heads of Government meeting in Apia in October.

Instead the Prince and Princess of Wales, both 43, have been keen to bring their children to Australia, with the timing expected to coincide with British school holidays next year.

Mr Albanese said: “We are hopeful that the Prince and Princess of Wales are able to visit as well and we are hopeful it might occur in the coming period.’’

Prince George, now 12, was nine months old the last time William and Catherine came to Australia in 2014.

His sibling Princess Charlotte, 10, has been on overseas tours to Canada in 2016 and to Poland and Germany in 2017, while seven-year-old Prince Louis has not been on a royal overseas tour.

A royal tour down under has been on the radar of the first in line to the throne for at least six years, but the Covid pandemic and then the death of Queen Elizabeth II – and the protocol that the King should visit each realm before other senior royals – came into play.

Meanwhile, Mr Albanese will visit the UK Labour conference in Liverpool on Sunday and deliver a speech, which may touch on his government’s ability to cut inflation despite ongoing cost pressures on energy prices.

Energy costs in the UK are as much as four times higher than in Australia and it has contributed to persistent inflation levels above five per cent, leaving the British economy reeling with the highest inflation of all its major trading partners.

Mr Albanese said: “We know the cost-of-living pressures have been a global phenomenon but in Australia but we have managed to get inflation down to have a two in front of it, instead of the six in front which was there when we were elected.

“We have done that whilst maintaining strong employment growth and whilst real wages are increasing, and that's a good thing.”

Mr Albanese also defended his attendance at the conference, pointing out he had meetings with the Conservative opposition party during this trip and that key government ministers including those relating to trade, would be in attendance.

He told The Australian he was “looking forward” to his upcoming meeting with Mr Trump at the White House on October 20.

When asked if he had picked up any hints from the British Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer who has a good relationship with the US President, Mr Albanese replied: “I engage with people one on one the same way that I engage with people in Australia. I find that human relations and having those discussions is just to treat people as I am treated and certainly the discussions that I have had with President Trump whether on the phone or last week in New York have been very warm, constructive and positive and I look forward to October 20.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122314

File: adf7b585ef35a30⋯.jpg (212.54 KB,1280x720,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 7acac747d980ed5⋯.jpg (131.8 KB,768x768,1:1,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23670086 (290934ZSEP25) Notable: ‘Provocative’: China’s riot police endanger fragile Pacific island peace – Chinese police have been secretly training Solomon Islands officers in riot control in Malaita province and expanding the controversial Fengqiao surveillance program beyond Honiara. Photos obtained by The Australian show officers demonstrating riot batons and signing up villages for fingerprinting under the guise of “community policing”. Former Malaita premier Daniel Suidani called the operation “very provocative” and a threat to local freedoms, accusing Beijing of trying to “suppress the people”. He warned that “Kung Fu diplomacy” and police gifts were precursors to Chinese mining interests as he mounts a comeback bid against the pro-Beijing government.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122199

>>122200

>>122248

>>122219

>>122307

‘Provocative’: China’s riot police endanger fragile Pacific island peace

STEPHEN RICE - 28 September 2025

1/2

Chinese police are secretly training local Solomon Islands police in riot control tactics in the intensely anti-Beijing province of Malaita, and introducing the Fengqiao state surveillance program they had previously claimed to be running only as a “pilot” program in the capital, Honiara.

The Australian has obtained photos showing Chinese police in the province demonstrating the use of riot batons during sessions described as “command and control”, and on a separate mission signing up Malaita villages to the “Fengqiao Experience”, revealed earlier this month to involve fingerprinting citizens under the guise of community policing.

The provocative moves comes as the fiercely independent province is once again pushing back against the pro-Beijing central government, with ousted former Malaita premier Daniel Suidani preparing a bid to return to power in October.

The new Chinese police intervention in Malaita, which has also seen the arrival of “Kung Fu diplomacy” – martial arts classes for both local police and children – is a direct provocation and a danger to the fragile peace that followed anti-Beijing riots in 2021, Suidani told The Australian.

Before he was deposed as premier of Malaita in 2023, the pro-Taiwan Suidani had banned Chinese companies from entering the province, even blocking the installation of Huawei mobile phone towers in his one-man war against China’s most concerted bid anywhere in the South Pacific to exert its power.

The premier who replaced Suidani has given China free rein in the province, even permitting the “community policing” system based on Mao Zedong’s “Fengqiao Experience” that required citizens to keep tabs on each other during the Cultural Revolution.

Now Solomon Islands’ most strident anti-Beijing warrior is fighting back.

Suidani won a High Court action to overturn his dismissal and while he still faces a potential jail term over a trumped-up charge of inciting riots, he is determined to keep China – and its insidious Fengqiao program – out of his beloved Malaita.

“You cannot just come into our community like an intruder and start doing things without saying why you are coming,” the former schoolteacher says.

“This is very provocative. It is to stop people being vocal about their rights.

“We should not change the Melanesian culture we use to live because we still own this place.

“The people don’t want the Chinese police in their communities, collecting data on the households, so much nitty gritty information – we have government departments here to collect that information, it’s not for the Chinese police to come here.”

Suidani pointed out that China has supplied Solomon Islands police with armoured water cannon trucks for riot control, claiming the move is “to suppress the people – this is something that is not acceptable.”

Suidani says he will kick “King Fu diplomacy” out of the province, too.

“It’s a huge danger that can be used against us, this new strategy of training the kids to know how to fight like they see in the movies the Chinese send, they see it as very enjoyable but they don’t know the end result.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122315

File: af5b0d3a6d695c0⋯.jpg (250.39 KB,1280x721,1280:721,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 245325bb9166cfc⋯.jpg (216.62 KB,1706x960,853:480,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 8ddebacc8020c33⋯.jpg (362.52 KB,1536x2049,512:683,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23670099 (290941ZSEP25) Notable: COMMENTARY: Island paradise becomes testing ground for China’s riot control“Beijing’s test case, the once fiercely independent Solomon Islands, tells you everything you need to know about Xi Jinping’s plan for our neighbours. The security pact that China signed with Solomon Islands in 2022 was just the precursor... Beijing increasingly is pulling the strings... imposing the insidious ‘Fengqiao’ surveillance scheme under the guise of community policing. We are losing this contest faster than we can imagine. We were hopelessly outplayed by a much more aggressive rival. Celsus Talifilu – who memorably acquired the draft security pact between China and Solomon Islands and posted it on the internet... reflected on the threat posed by the ‘Fengqiao Experience’ to Solomon Islands’ freedom. ‘Its essence is simple but dangerous: get ordinary citizens to spy on each other, report “troublemakers”, and pressure anyone who steps out of line back into conformity... Malaita, with its proud history of resisting foreign influence, must not become the testing ground for imported systems that erode trust between people.’ Tragically, it already is the testing ground.” – Stephen Rice, The Australian

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122199

>>122248

>>122219

>>122307

>>122314

COMMENTARY: Island paradise becomes testing ground for China’s riot control

STEPHEN RICE - 28 September 2025

China is rolling out its masterplan for the Pacific and barely bothering to hide its tracks.

And why should it?

Beijing’s test case, the once fiercely independent Solomon Islands, tells you everything you need to know about Xi Jinping’s plan for our neighbours.

The security pact that China signed with Solomon Islands in 2022 was just the precursor.

In the past two weeks The Australian has revealed how Beijing increasingly is pulling the strings in Solomon Islands, forcing Prime Minister Jeremiah Manele to freeze a prominent anti-China MP out of a place in the government and imposing the insidious “Fengqiao” surveillance scheme under the guise of community policing.

But as we reveal today, the dob-in-a-mate scheme was no “pilot” project, as claimed – it already has been pushed into the historically anti-Beijing province of Malaita, where protesters previously have rioted against ties with China.

Beijing’s new answer: send in its police to train local police in riot control. China is marching straight into trouble spots with no pretence about its intentions.

We are losing this contest faster than we can imagine.

Anthony Albanese has embarked on another world tour, recognising Palestine at the UN, getting his selfie with US President Donald Trump and sinking beers with British Prime Minister Keir Starmer, but – whatever you think of those achievements – they don’t cancel out the humiliations of the previous weeks in his Pacific odyssey.

The Prime Minister’s failure to conclude security treaties with Papua New Guinea and Vanuatu wasn’t simply a case of last-minute hitches. We were hopelessly outplayed by a much more aggressive rival.

To be fair, this is not just on Albanese. Successive Coalition governments treated our Pacific neighbours more like friendly holiday destinations than strategic allies.

Now we’re scrambling to play catch-up from decades of neglect, while the US is simply walking away in a soft-power surrender.

Trump’s decision to cut off hundreds of millions of dollars in aid to Pacific nations earlier this year was a gift to China as Xi is testing the resolve of the West in our own backyard.

China has been sending out its ambassadors bearing gifts: a new outboard motor for a fishing village, solar panels for the medical clinic, water tanks for a hall.

But Beijing hasn’t stopped there. It operates in ways Australia can’t – bribing and intimidating politicians who are compliant and useful, trying to lock up those who aren’t.

Last week, former Malaita premier Daniel Suidani and his political adviser were sitting in a Honiara court facing a criminal trial on transparently trumped-up charges of unlawful assembly over anti-China riots in 2021.

Suidani is determined to win back the premiership of the province from which he was illegally ousted. But first he has to stay out of jail. His co-accused, Celsus Talifilu – who memorably acquired the draft security pact between China and Solomon Islands and posted it on the internet – also is no stranger to China’s tactics.

But seeing Beijing muscle directly into their province has shocked both men.

As he was waiting for the trial to begin, Talifilu reflected on the threat posed by the “Fengqiao Experience” to Solomon Islands’ freedom – and to Malaita culture.

“Its essence is simple but dangerous: get ordinary citizens to spy on each other, report ‘troublemakers’, and pressure anyone who steps out of line back into conformity,” he wrote on his Facebook page.

“Malaita, with its proud history of resisting foreign influence, must not become the testing ground for imported systems that erode trust between people.”

Tragically, it already is the testing ground.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/island-paradise-becomes-testing-ground-for-chinas-riot-control/news-story/3e97b8d9cb70cc1391405de2f41790a3

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122316

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23670115 (290952ZSEP25) Notable: Video: Keir Starmer hails Anthony Albanese as his ally against ‘divisive’ right at conference – British Prime Minister Keir Starmer has hailed Anthony Albanese as an “inspiration to the left” and a “key partner in standing up to the divisive politics of the right” at the UK Labour conference in Liverpool. Mr Albanese, the event’s sole international speaker, told delegates that “the low politics of fear and resentment are easy – but they only divide the country, they don’t advance it.” To a standing ovation, he pledged to work with Sir Keir to “defend democracy itself” and said “unity of labour is the hope of the world.”

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122300

>>122311

>>122312

>>122313

Keir Starmer hails Anthony Albanese as his ally against ‘divisive’ right at conference

GEOFF CHAMBERS and RICHARD FERGUSON - 29 September 2025

Britain’s beleaguered Prime ­Minister Keir Starmer has hailed Anthony Albanese as an “inspiration to the left” and his key ­partner against the “divisive politics of the right” at his make-or-break UK Labour conference.

As he avoids questions on ­US President Donald Trump’s crackdown on his internal enemies in America and refuses to meet Britain’s most popular political figure Nigel ­Farage, the Australian Prime Minister told UK Labour that the “low politics of fear and resentment are easy”.

The Prime Minister was the sole international speaker at Sir Keir’s conference in Liverpool, where Sir Keir is trying to reboot his leadership after a month of scandal that led to him losing his deputy leader Angela Rayner, his ambassador to ­Washington and his chief ­strategist.

Other past global speakers at the UK Labour conference have included late South African president Nelson Mandela.

To a standing ovation in ­Liverpool, Mr Albanese told the crowd he would work with Sir Keir – a staunch supporter of the three-country AUKUS security pact and Mr Albanese’s ­closest ideological counterpart on the world stage – to ­“defend democracy itself” and has warned of threats to the world’s “capacity for peaceful disagreement”.

Prominent Australian ALP ­figures in the audience included party president Wayne Swan, ­national secretary Paul Erickson, former prime minister Julia Gillard and Australia’s high commissioner to the UK and former Labor defence minister Stephen Smith.

The visit has been described by some Labor figures as “indulgent” after Mr Albanese, who has built close friendships inside British ­Labour over decades, won 94 seats at the May 3 election.

While he claimed Australian Labor and its British sister party were defending democracy, Mr ­Albanese has refused to weigh in on the US President’s attitude to free speech and his lawfare against political enemies such as former FBI director James Comey.

Mr Albanese also refused to meet with the Reform UK leader – a one-time ally of Mr Trump – during his time in Britain, despite the right-wing party dominating domestic British polling.

After conducting a round of media interviews on Sunday ­reassuring voters he could ­stabilise the government and get his leadership back on track, Sir Keir told Labour members and supporters at the Liverpool ­Exhibition Centre that Mr Albanese was a “friend of mine and an ­inspiration to those of us on the left”.

“Albo and I have known each other a long time, we’ve met in many places around the world,” he said.

He described Mr Albanese as a “key partner in standing up to the divisive politics of the right – ­taking the fight for the souls of our countries to those who peddle grievances armed with our shared values and our determination to deliver change”.

Sir Keir told the audience that Mr Albanese had turned up to 10 Downing Street on Friday “armed with cans of ‘Albo’ beer, I kid you not”.

“This is a relationship that ­really matters – so I am delighted to introduce to the stage a true friend of Britain, my friend, the Prime Minister of Australia,” the Labour leader said.

Amid the rise of Mr Farage’s Reform UK party and other right-wing movements across the world, Mr Albanese told Labour members that “every day counts”.

“Tearing things down is easy – but it doesn’t leave you with ­anything,” the Prime Minister said. “The low politics of fear and resentment are easy – but they only divide the country, they don’t advance it.

“The things worth doing, are hard.

“And things worth doing, are worth fighting for.”

Standing alongside Sir Keir, Mr Albanese told British Labour supporters that “unity of labour is the hope of the world”.

“That has always been labour at our best,” he said.

“Unity of party – and unity of purpose. A movement that looks out to the world with hope for the future – and works together to make it better.

“Unity of labour reflects the power of solidarity to drive change.”

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/keir-starmer-hails-anthony-albanese-as-his-ally-against-divisive-right-at-conference/news-story/389a08ed90d912088b7bd410444e0e8b

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ibRHrqdMeAU

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122317

File: 28f2e19a033a93c⋯.jpg (197.56 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 968acb8e83bd722⋯.jpg (267.58 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: d82ea5bb8301a5f⋯.jpg (133.18 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23670135 (291003ZSEP25) Notable: COMMENTARY: Too close to Starmer? Why Albanese intervened in UK politics“At the British Labour conference in Liverpool on Sunday, it was Anthony Albanese being held aloft as an exemplar: a Tory-slaying, centre-left leader from the Antipodes who managed to come from behind to achieve a resounding re-election victory... For Albanese, the inevitability that he would be attacked at home as self-indulgent, hubristic and overly partisan for appearing at such an event was a risk worth taking... Building rapport and trust with fellow world leaders is essential, but there is a line between diplomacy and politicking. Scott Morrison was accused of going too far by appearing with Trump at a campaign-style rally during a 2019 trip to Ohio... [Albanese’s] Liverpool expedition falls in the same contestable category.” – Matthew Knott, The Age

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122300

>>122311

>>122312

>>122313

>>122316

Too close to Starmer? Why Albanese intervened in UK politics

Matthew Knott - September 29, 2025

1/2

Liverpool: So much for cultural cringe, the idea of Australians showing undue deference to the mother country. At the British Labour conference in Liverpool on Sunday, it was Anthony Albanese being held aloft as an exemplar: a Tory-slaying, centre-left leader from the Antipodes who managed to come from behind to achieve a resounding re-election victory.

Though he would never say so, British Prime Minister Keir Starmer clearly hoped some of the Albo glow would rub off on his embattled government. For Albanese, the inevitability that he would be attacked at home as self-indulgent, hubristic and overly partisan for appearing at such an event was a risk worth taking.

As a smiling Albanese sat on the conference stage beside him, Starmer heaped praise upon his counterpart. Introducing the guest of honour as a “true friend of Britain”, Starmer hailed Albanese as “a real inspiration to those of us on the left, someone who is leading his country in the politics of renewal and, of course, winning a landslide victory earlier this summer”. The Labour loyalists in the audience burst into cheers, delighted to be reminded that a progressive government can face struggles in its first term and still emerge victorious, as Albanese’s team did after the Voice referendum failure.

When Albanese rose to speak, they gave him a standing ovation. Sitting in the crowd was Julia Gillard, who also received hearty applause as a pioneering female progressive leader.

A little over a year after achieving a crushing victory over the UK conservatives, Starmer is floundering in the polls and facing increasingly pointed questions about how long he can survive in the job. Four long years remain until the next British election is scheduled, but patience is clearly in short supply in the UK. Nigel Farage’s anti-immigrant Reform party is on the march, triggering alarm among British Labour loyalists about Starmer’s failure to resonate with voters. They needed a pick-me-up and Albanese was there to provide it.

Being in the birthplace of the Beatles, Albanese joked that he had to get his musical references out of the way early as he described his journey from Sydney to Liverpool as a “long and winding road”. It would have been impolite but accurate for Albanese to reference Help! to explain why Starmer had called him in to give a pep talk to the troops. “Help me if you can, I’m feeling down/And I do appreciate your being ’round,” Lennon and McCartney wrote. “Help me get my feet back on the ground/Won’t you please, please, help me?”

Albanese returned the favour to Starmer, saying he and “this man, this leader, this prime minister, my friend” shared an “absolute resolve to stand together and defend democracy itself”. As he stood at a lectern emblazoned with UK Labour’s slogan, Renew Britain, it sounded like an endorsement that Starmer should be allowed to keep doing his job.

Albanese pointed out some had predicted his government would be defeated or forced into minority at the May election, punished for high inflation like incumbents around the world.

“But one of the reasons we won re-election, and indeed were able to increase our majority is because in difficult times we offered people real hope,” he said. “We didn’t pretend that we had solved every problem in just three years, but we could point to an economy that was turning the corner.”

Take a sad song and make it better, one might say.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122318

File: a8fcb43f1ad4f42⋯.jpg (2.21 MB,5832x3888,3:2,Clipboard.jpg)

File: f929e0133160391⋯.jpg (123.09 KB,1512x889,216:127,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23670160 (291017ZSEP25) Notable: OPINION: Albanese’s Liverpool kiss is up there with Morrison’s MAGA rally“Anthony Albanese made no attempt to hide the overt political nature of his keynote appearance at the UK Labour Conference... Introduced by his ‘mate’ Keir Starmer as an ‘inspiration to all of us on the left’ and a ‘key partner in standing up to the divisive politics of the right’, the Australian PM issued a full-throated call to arms for the labour movement globally... It was all rather unorthodox, given that... six years ago, he ripped into then-prime minister Scott Morrison for attending a Trump rally in Ohio... [Albanese] contended his Liverpool appearance was different because he was invited by Starmer (the White House had invited Morrison) and that he would be chatting to ministers afterwards. As a fig leaf, while in London, he also met briefly with Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch - but there’s no suggestion he’ll be addressing the next UK Tory conference.” - Phillip Coorey, Australian Financial Review

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122300

>>122311

>>122312

>>122313

>>122316

Opinion: Albanese’s Liverpool kiss is up there with Morrison’s MAGA rally

The Australian PM had been making a virtue of not weighing in to the domestic politics of other countries. Then he stood up at UK Labour’s annual conference.

Phillip Coorey - Sep 29, 2025

Liverpool | Anthony Albanese made no attempt to hide the overt political nature of his keynote appearance at the UK Labour Conference on Sunday night. (AEST).

Introduced by his “mate” Keir Starmer as an “inspiration to all of us on the left” and a “key partner in standing up to the divisive politics of the right”, the Australian PM issued a full-throated call to arms for the labour movement globally to act as the gatekeepers of democracy and the institutions that underpin it.

In doing so, he went into bat for Starmer, who, after just a year and a bit into the five-year term, face a fight for his leadership.

With that tension to be the elephant in the room over the next few days in Liverpool, Albanese called on the assembled throng to give the man what he said every progressive leader needs – time.

“To give you some sense of that, in Australia, my colleagues and I were re-elected less than five months ago and yet, our next election is due before yours,” he said.

“For Labor governments, every day counts because it takes time to turn promises into progress.

“For inflation to fall, wages to rise, new homes to be finished, new energy connected, new hospitals to open, new investments in education to flow into results.

“It takes time to tackle problems that have been created over decades.”

Geddit?

In isolation, Albanese’s speech was a cracker. By the time he ended, the auditorium was stamping its feet as he drew a sharp distinction between parties of protest and those, like Labor, who realise that to put words into effect, it “had to be in government”.

“Because government is where you get things done. The Labor mission has never been a theoretical exercise – or a rhetorical one. Our work is measured in deeds – and it depends on delivery.”

Two days after Starmer declared the centre right in Britain and Europe had “withered on the vine” and that Nigel Farage’s Reform UK Party was now the Opposition, Albanese took aim at the right-wing populist, too.

“Tearing things down is easy, but it doesn’t leave you with anything.

The low politics of fear and resentment are easy, but they only divide the country, they don’t advance it,” he said.

It was all rather unorthodox, given that until that point on this long trip, the Australian Prime Minister had made a virtue of not weighing in to the domestic politics of another country, be it commenting on Donald Trump’s wild speech to the United Nations last week, or the polls in the UK showing Farage could form government if an election were held now.

Six years ago, he ripped into then-prime ministe Scott Morrison for attending a Trump rally in Ohio.

Morrison and Trump were opening a new Visy recycling centre in the Midwest and Trump turned the occasion into a MAGA rally, riling Albanese who called it inappropriate for a prime minister to be engaging in partisan politics while abroad.

“Scott Morrison has hurt our alliance with the United States. When he visited the US in 2019, he went to a Trump rally – but didn’t meet with any senior Democrats. He has put his own political interests above the bipartisanship of our most important relationship,” Albanese said at the time.

He contended his Liverpool appearance was different because he was invited by Starmer (the White House had invited Morrison) and that he would be chatting to ministers afterwards.

As a fig leaf, while in London, he also met briefly with Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch – but there’s no suggestion he’ll be addressing the next UK Tory conference.

https://www.afr.com/politics/federal/comment-20250928-p5myju

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122319

File: c119b476d72bde2⋯.jpg (213.42 KB,1919x1080,1919:1080,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 46ae8cd1282e3ef⋯.jpg (309.24 KB,814x467,814:467,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23675023 (300941ZSEP25) Notable: ‘Standing up unequivocally’: Australian film sector snaps back at Trump tariffs – Arts Minister Tony Burke has vowed to “stand up unequivocally for the rights of the Australian screen industry” after US President Donald Trump renewed his threat of a 100 per cent tariff on all foreign-made films. The proposed measure, aimed at “rejuvenating Hollywood,” has drawn criticism from filmmakers and academics who warn it would damage the global industry. Actor Bryan Brown urged Australians to “get on with our stories,” while analyst Ben Eltham called the move a “TACO - Trump Always Chickens Out - situation.” The policy’s implementation remains unclear, but observers say it could reshape international film production.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

‘Standing up unequivocally’: Australian film sector snaps back at Trump tariffs

Trump’s renewed 100 per cent tariff threat on all foreign films puts Australia’s screen industry squarely in the crosshairs – but the country isn’t backing down.

BIANCA FARMAKIS - 30 September 2025

1/2

Arts Minister Tony Burke has pledged to stand up for the Australian film industry against Don­ald Trump’s 100 per cent tariff on movies produced outside the US, as filmmakers warn that a trade war will drive Hollywood into terminal decline.

In a statement provided to The Australian, Mr Burke said the government would continue to “monitor the situation” brewing in the White House and “any ­impacts it might have for us in Australia”.

“Nobody should be under any doubt that we will be standing up unequivocally for the rights of the Australian screen industry,” Mr Burke said.

Mr Trump’s renewed tariff call is part of the US President’s plan to rejuvenate Hollywood by punishing offshore production, as he accused political arch-rival and California governor Gavin Newsom of failing to protect the domestic industry.

After months of speculation after he first floated the idea in May, Mr Trump wrote in a Truth Social post on September 29: “Our movie making business has been stolen from the United States of America by other countries, just like stealing candy from a baby,”

He described the entertainment sector as “dying a very fast death”.

Key details, including when the tariff would take effect and whether it would apply to co-­productions or streaming platforms, remained unclear.

The call came at a moment when US film production was down nearly 40 per cent since pre-Covid levels, with recent writers’ strikes stalling momentum.

“The US is considering one of the most sweeping protectionist measures in its history of cultural policy,” said Mike Seymour, an Emmy-nominated visual effects artist and senior lecturer at the University of Sydney.

“It can be argued that these countries are not undermining the US industry, they are subsidising it. Our tax incentives effectively support Hollywood studios through generous production incentives. If those subsidies weren’t profitable for the US studios, they simply wouldn’t take advantage of them.”

Actor Bryan Brown said Mr Trump’s remarks “are just an incentive [for the Australian film industry] to say ‘Don’t rely on other people. Get on with it yourself, like the resurgence in the 1960s and ’70s.

“Let’s make Australian movies, let’s tell Australian stories.”

Asked whether 100 per cent tariffs could harm the Australian film industry, Brown said: “We have no idea what he (Trump) means by it or what it actually means but I think the main thing is, let’s just get on with our stories in whatever way we’ve got to do it.”

The tariff policy has been criticised for overlooking key facts: Australia and Britain import far more US film and TV than they export, and America remains the world’s largest entertainment exporter, with $US22.6bn in exports in 2023, according to the Motion Picture Association of America.

As well, 70 per cent of box office revenue stems from inter­national markets, Heeyon Kim, an assistant professor of strategy at Cornell University, says.

“The film industry has long relied on openness and cross-border collaboration. Far from being a weakness, international production is one of its key advantages. Undermining that advantage through tariffs would carry costs that extend well beyond the financial,” Dr Seymour said.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122320

File: 7cfa13a3cc81352⋯.jpg (281.79 KB,1638x921,546:307,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23675053 (300955ZSEP25) Notable: AUKUS survives Pentagon review, with US submarine sales to proceed – Nikkei Asia reports that the Trump administration will proceed with the AUKUS defence pact, maintaining plans to sell three Virginia-class submarines to Australia from 2032. The outlet says a Pentagon review, led by Undersecretary of Defense for Policy Elbridge Colby, found the project consistent with President Donald Trump’s “America First” agenda. Sources told Nikkei the review will conclude before Prime Minister Anthony Albanese’s October 20 White House visit. The process examined industrial capacity and Australia’s potential role in a Taiwan conflict. Analysts say AUKUS remains “low-risk” for Washington, though the US may pressure Canberra to lift defence spending to 5 per cent of GDP.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109461 (pb)

>>122177

>>122236

>>122237

>>122300

AUKUS survives Pentagon review, with US submarine sales to proceed

Washington to conclude evaluation ahead of Australian PM's visit on Oct. 20

KEN MORIYASU - September 30, 2025

WASHINGTON - The Trump administration will proceed with the AUKUS defense pact linking the U.S., U.K. and Australia, maintaining the original timeline that includes the sale of three Virginia-class submarines to Canberra beginning in 2032, Nikkei Asia has learned.

The defense pact, hatched under former U.S. President Joe Biden in 2021, was undergoing a months-long Pentagon review spearheaded by Undersecretary of Defense for Policy Elbridge Colby to ensure the project was aligned with President Donald Trump's "America First" agenda.

Sources told Nikkei that the review will wrap up before Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese visits the White House on Oct. 20.

"AUKUS is safe," one official from a member country said. While industrial delays might affect delivery, no political decision has been made to alter the submarine schedule, the official added.

The review focused on whether U.S. commitments - especially the transfer of the Virginia-class submarines to Australia in the coming years - would strain the American defense industrial base. Pentagon officials also questioned whether Australia would be willing to deploy the submarines in a potential U.S.-China conflict over Taiwan, raising concerns about operational readiness.

The first pillar of the AUKUS pact is a three-decade project to replace the Royal Australian Navy's aging, conventionally powered Collins-class submarines with nuclear-powered subs, through the assistance of key allies. Pillar 2 involves joint research and development of advanced technology such as artificial intelligence and maritime autonomous system, of which Japan has been invited to join.

The plan envisions Washington selling three to five Virginia-class submarines to Canberra starting in 2032.

Then, the U.K. and Australia will build AUKUS-class submarines for their respective navies based on a British design - first in the U.K. by the late 2030s, followed by an Australian-built version by the early 2040s.

During an appearance at Britain's Policy Exchange think tank last year, Colby expressed skepticism toward AUKUS, saying the nuclear-powered attack submarine, like the Virginia class, is "the single most important conventional military asset we have for a Taiwan fight." Though Australia is a close ally, it is not the same as having the submarines in America's own fleet, he said.

"But the bigger problem is that our submarine industrial base is not in position to actually produce enough attack submarines" to match American defense needs, he said.

Colby did say in the same appearance that if the allies could find a way to bolster the industrial base and produce more submarines, AUKUS could succeed.

Elizabeth Buchanan, a senior fellow at the Australian Strategic Policy Institute (ASPI) and fellow of Washington's Center for the National Interest, said that continuing AUKUS is a low-risk policy for Washington that can send a political signal and shore up Australian comfort in terms of the alliance.

"This doesn't change the fact that Canberra might not receive the Virginia-class submarines," she warned. "Much can change in the period ahead."

Buchanan suggested the U.S. may pressure Australia to raise defense spending to 5% of gross domestic product in exchange for continued support - an ask she said could be politically difficult for Albanese and a strategic way to shift blame if AUKUS falters.

Australia has pledged to invest around $3 billion in the U.S. and U.K. submarine industrial bases to help increase production rates.

At his confirmation hearing in July, U.S. Chief of Naval Operations Adm. Daryl Caudle said the American production rate needs to double to around 2.2 to 2.3 submarines a year to meet the AUKUS demand.

Greg Brown, director of regional cooperation and coordination at ASPI USA, said, "Contrary to a lot of misguided commentary, AUKUS embodies America First policy. Australia pays billions upfront, commits to hosting and resupplying U.S. assets and assumes front-line responsibility for Indo-Pacific deterrence."

From the perspective of Trump and Colby, this is exactly how alliances should work, Brown said.

"For Trump, it's proof that his style and approach can strengthen America's strategic position by driving allies to become more useful and self-reliant without abandoning them," he said.

https://asia.nikkei.com/spotlight/trump-administration/aukus-survives-pentagon-review-with-us-submarine-sales-to-proceed

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122321

File: 3d5a7cea049c075⋯.jpg (224.75 KB,1769x995,1769:995,Clipboard.jpg)

File: e78db8c3cd0b964⋯.jpg (404.14 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23680217 (010956ZOCT25) Notable: Anthony Albanese says security ties with US as strong as ever ahead of Donald Trump meeting – Prime Minister Anthony Albanese says Australia’s alliance with the United States is “as strong as it’s ever been” as he prepares for a White House meeting with President Donald Trump on October 20. Speaking to The Australian after his 11-day overseas tour, Mr Albanese said the $368 billion AUKUS submarine deal was progressing despite a Pentagon review. He cited Talisman Sabre 2025 and new defence investments as proof of deepening ties, calling his first in-person meeting with Mr Trump “warm and good”. Mr Albanese said the US “has a critical role to play in global security” and engagement in the Indo-Pacific.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122300

>>122310

>>122311

>>122320

Anthony Albanese says security ties with US as strong as ever ahead of Donald Trump meeting

GEOFF CHAMBERS - 1 October 2025

1/2

Anthony Albanese has declared Australia’s security alliance with the United States is as strong as it’s ever been amid growing expectations the $368bn AUKUS nuclear submarine deal is safe.

In an interview with The Australian while flying home to Sydney after an 11-day overseas trip to the US, Britain and United Arab Emirates, the Prime Minister revealed details of a positive first in-person catch-up with Donald Trump in New York last week ahead of their bilateral meeting at the White House on October 20.

Reflecting on his longest international trip since winning the 2022 election – which included stops in New York, London, Balmoral, Liverpool and Abu Dhabi for the United Nations General Assembly and meetings with British Prime Minister Keir Starmer, Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney, King Charles and United Arab Emirates President Mohamed bin Zayed Al Nahyan – Mr Albanese rejected Coalition criticism of his British Labour Party conference speech in Liverpool and confirmed he would take his first holiday since January 5.

After recognising Palestinian statehood, touting Labor’s ambitious 2035 emissions reduction target, launching the commencement of the Australia-UAE trade deal, promoting the government’s social media ban and defending progressive politics against the threat of populist right-wing parties, Mr Albanese will now turn his mind to a high-stakes meeting with Mr Trump in Washington DC.

Ahead of parliament returning briefly for three days next week, Mr Albanese said the AUKUS nuclear submarine and defence deal was already progressing despite an ongoing Pentagon review. The AUKUS deal, according to various media outlets in recent weeks, is likely to proceed given the strategic importance of the pact in response to the expanding military threat of China in the Indo-Pacific region.

In addition to senior Australian Defence Force personnel embedding into British and US forces, Mr Albanese cited this year’s staging of the biggest ever Exercise Talisman Sabre as a further example of strength in the US-Australia alliance.

From Austal’s shipbuilding facilities in Alabama to the $12bn boost for upgrades at Henderson Defence Precinct in Western Australia, Mr Albanese said the security relationship was going from strength to strength. In addition to providing sovereign shipbuilding capability and continuous naval shipbuilding, the Henderson facility is viewed by US military commanders as strategically critical in supporting nuclear-powered submarines operating in the Indo-Pacific region from 2027.

There are also 150 Australian personnel based in Hawaii as part of the Indo-Pacific Command and senior naval officers attached with the US and British, including at Barrow-in-Furness.

Mr Albanese – who was feted by Joe Biden with a state visit and dinner in 2023 – said his first in-person meeting with Mr Trump last week “was warm and good”. Jodie Haydon, Mr Albanese’s fiancee, also spoke with Melania Trump after attending an earlier event hosted by the first lady in New York.

“He (Mr Trump) was very positive about me and Jodie. It was good with Melania, I hadn’t had discussions with her. Melania had a chat with Jodie, and Jodie had attended an event earlier that day that was convened by Melania. All of the indications are positive,” Mr Albanese, who made the point “no one has a lower tariff rate than us”, told The Australian.

The Labor leader, who has had four phone conversations with Mr Trump since the Republican billionaire won the US election in November last year, revealed that after one of their chats the US President helped dispatch Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent to attend an investment summit hosted in February by Kevin Rudd, Australia’s ambassador in Washington.

“I said we would like serious representation, he did that, he delivered and sent (Scott Bessent),” he said.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122322

File: 6b4b7749a86454a⋯.jpg (2.57 MB,3000x2000,3:2,Clipboard.jpg)

File: fcfd4400b505c30⋯.jpg (3.24 MB,3000x2000,3:2,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23680241 (011011ZOCT25) Notable: Albanese endorses Trump’s Gaza role, but isn’t ready to nominate him for a Nobel Prize – Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has backed US President Donald Trump’s leadership in a Gaza peace plan, saying “you cannot envisage a pathway to peace without direct engagement of the United States.” Speaking after his 11-day overseas trip, Mr Albanese said recognising Palestine “helped to create the momentum” for the ceasefire proposal unveiled by Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. While declining to endorse Mr Trump for a Nobel Prize, he said the focus should be “peace and security for millions of people in the Middle East,” and left open a possible Australian role in post-war Gaza.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122289

>>122294

>>122298

>>122299

>>122300

Albanese endorses Trump’s Gaza role, but isn’t ready to nominate him for a Nobel Prize

Matthew Knott - October 1, 2025

1/2

Australia’s decision to recognise a Palestinian state as part of an international coalition helped encourage Israel and the United States to agree to a sweeping Gaza peace plan, Anthony Albanese has argued as he backed Donald Trump taking on a hands-on role in post-war Gaza.

As the prime minister looks ahead to his upcoming meeting with Trump in Washington, DC, on October 20, he demurred on whether the US president should be awarded a Nobel Prize, and would not say if he had faith in Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s commitment to ending the war in Gaza.

Decompressing in the boardroom office of the prime minister’s jet as the Middle East vanished below, Albanese sat down with this masthead on the return leg of his longest international trip since he came to office. Freed from formal meetings, Albanese cut a casual figure in a NSW Blues State of Origin jersey with his name on the back.

Albanese’s 11-day trip took him from New York to London to Abu Dhabi via a controversial stop in Liverpool to speak at the UK Labour Party conference. His final official engagement – a meeting with United Arab Emirates President Mohamed bin Zayed Al Nahyan – came just hours before Trump and Netanyahu stood together in the White House to announce their peace plan.

The US and Israel publicly opposed the push to recognise Palestine as a state led by French President Emmanuel Macron, which Australia joined at last week’s United Nations General Assembly, branding it a reward for Hamas’ October 7, 2023, attacks. The federal Coalition slammed it as premature. After much equivocating, New Zealand decided now was not the right time.

Albanese believes the unveiling of Trump’s peace plan, which Hamas has not accepted or rejected, vindicated his decision to take the plunge.

“Undoubtedly, it was motivated by positive momentum,” Albanese says when asked whether the decision by Australia, the UK, Canada and others to recognise Palestine helped pressure Trump and Netanyahu to agree to a plan to end the war in Gaza.

“I said when I spoke originally about our intention to recognise that we would do so at a time that helped to create the momentum and that it couldn’t just be a gesture.”

Albanese stresses that recognition of Palestine, which could be dismissed as pure symbolism when viewed in isolation, was paired with intense discussions with key players about how to end the war, isolate Hamas and rebuild Gaza. In New York, he met with the King of Jordan, Abdullah II, and he sat down in London with Tony Blair, who would oversee a Gaza transitional authority under Trump’s plan.

“So we wanted to ensure it made a positive difference and I believe it did,” Albanese says. “Sometimes out of the darkest period comes a sliver of light, and there needs to be change.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122323

File: 5bdc7bd03e70eb6⋯.jpg (224.32 KB,1329x862,1329:862,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 4b93157fd4987b3⋯.jpg (136.07 KB,1600x900,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 51aa1b3b415489c⋯.jpg (83.7 KB,800x600,4:3,Clipboard.jpg)

File: debe8d6070a0dc2⋯.jpg (513.05 KB,2353x1558,2353:1558,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 8c299a4e3f35687⋯.jpg (776.78 KB,2489x1654,2489:1654,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23680280 (011031ZOCT25) Notable: Donald Day Jr, US conspiracy theorist connected to Wieambilla killers, agrees to watered-down plea deal – Arizona-based conspiracy theorist Donald Day Jr, who praised the 2022 Wieambilla police killers, has reached a plea deal to admit possessing firearms as a convicted felon, while prosecutors drop three other charges including threats against US police. Day, known online as “Geronimo’s Bones,” had called Gareth and Stacey Train his “brave brother and sister” after they murdered Queensland officers Matthew Arnold and Rachel McCrow and neighbour Alan Dare. Court filings list 34 weapons — including rifles, pistols, a revolver, and large quantities of ammunition — stored in a mobile home “gun room.” The plea limits punishment to the low end of sentencing ranges, pending court approval.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109588 (pb)

>>122153

>>122185

>>122309

Donald Day Jr, US conspiracy theorist connected to Wieambilla killers, agrees to watered-down plea deal

Liam Walsh - 30 September 2025

A convicted felon who used YouTube to praise the extremists who murdered Queensland police officers during a deadly ambush at Wieambilla has agreed to a watered-down plea deal to US charges.

Arizona-based conspiracy theorist Donald Day Jr has agreed to plead guilty to possessing guns while a felon, but charges relating to threats against US police will be dropped, court documents state.

His case in Arizona sparked headlines as Day - who posted online under the name "Geronimo's Bones" - was also in contact with Gareth and Stacey Train.

They, along with family member Nathaniel, killed police officers Matthew Arnold and Rachel McCrow and neighbour Alan Dare in Queensland in 2022.

Day sent message of support on YouTube

Court documents detailed how Gareth and Stacey Train had posted an apocalyptic video on YouTube after the shootings, saying authorities "came to kills us and we killed them".

"We’ll see you at home, Don. Love you," they said.

Day responded he wished "that I could be with you to do what I do best". In another post, he wrote his "brave brother and sister" had "done exactly what they were supposed to do, and that is to kill these f*cking devils", the documents state.

Authorities in the US later charged Day with offences including threatening the director-general of the World Health Organisation and police, and possession of weapons.

According to a plea agreement filed in Arizona, both authorities and Day had agreed to a plea for him admitting to possession of guns and ammunition while a felon.

It lists 34 items including: a .45 calibre American Tactical pistol, a Marlin rifle with a Nikon scope, a Taurus .44 Magnum revolver, a Remington shotgun, an Izhmash Saiga 7.62 calibre semi-automatic rifle, plastic buckets of ammunition, and magazines filled with various calibre bullets.

Three remaining charges to be dropped

The documents indicate Day will plead to having kept the guns in a mobile home called the "gun room" he shared with the other person on the property. Weapons were also in a shed there.

The deal indicates he will plead to having used the firearms and ammunition, and while he did not purchase all of the armaments, he admitted to possessing them.

That was in violation of him already being a convicted felon.

The court documents state he had received multiple sentences since being convicted in California in 1986 for violence against authorities. Other felonies listed included larceny in 1987 in Wyoming, a prison assault in 1990 in California, and possession of stolen property.

But three other remaining charges - two for threats and one for an unregistered firearm - will be dropped. They include that in December 2023 he had threatened Federal Bureau of Investigation officers when being arrested.

He was accused of telling them: "If anything happens to my wife, and I ever get out of these cuffs, I’ll come for every f*ckng one of you. How’s that? You better kill me, if you f*ck my wife up, you hurt her in any way, you better kill me here and now."

The court plea documents list a stipulation from authorities and Day that his punishment "shall not exceed the low end" of sentencing ranges.

It said the maximum punishment for the breach of the law was a $250,000 fine and 15 years imprisonment.

A court must approve the plea deal.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-09-30/donald-day-jr-wieambilla-attack-plea-deal-conspiracy-theorist/105833978

https://qresear.ch/?q=Donald+Day

https://qresear.ch/?q=wieambilla

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122324

File: 3d3cb092e96f2ef⋯.jpg (1.99 MB,4240x2832,265:177,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 4a0e2c564cead93⋯.jpg (1.68 MB,3930x2624,1965:1312,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23684608 (020935ZOCT25) Notable: Papua New Guinea's cabinet approves 'Pukpuk' defence treaty with Australia – Papua New Guinea’s cabinet has approved the landmark “Pukpuk” defence treaty with Australia, which Prime Minister James Marape says will lift the nations’ security partnership to “its highest level in history.” The treaty — Australia’s first new alliance in more than 70 years — commits both countries to defend each other in the event of a military attack and could see up to 10,000 Papua New Guineans serve with the Australian Defence Force. Anthony Albanese welcomed the approval, calling it a “formal alliance.” Critics, including former PNG defence chief Jerry Singirok, warned it could compromise PNG’s independence and constitutional integrity.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122243

>>122246

>>122259

>>122272

>>122292

Papua New Guinea's cabinet approves 'Pukpuk' defence treaty with Australia

Nick Sas and Stephen Dziedzic - 2 October 2025

A landmark defence treaty between Australia and Papua New Guinea has been approved, with PNG's Prime Minister James Marape saying it will elevate the two countries' security relationship to "its highest level in history".

The treaty, known as the Pukpuk treaty, is Australia's first new alliance in more than 70 years, and will see the two countries agree to defend each other in the event of a military attack.

In a statement released this afternoon, Mr Marape confirmed his cabinet had agreed on the treaty, which he said would ensure Papua New Guinea was "safe, secure, and prepared to protect its people and borders".

He also revealed plans under the treaty for as many as 10,000 Papua New Guineans to serve with the Australian Defence Force, under "dual arrangements".

"This treaty is not just about maintaining barracks and boats," Mr Marape said in the statement.

"We are investing in both hardware and software for defence so that we can effectively police our borders and safeguard our nation.

"Australia is our foundational relationship country.

"Now this treaty elevates our relationship to the highest level, where force synergies, and capacity development for interoperability is reached."

The treaty was due to be signed during Prime Minister Anthony Albanese's trip to PNG last month, but the two countries instead signed a "communique" after PNG's cabinet failed to reach a quorum.

Mr Albanese said he welcomed the formal approval of the treaty by the PNG cabinet.

"Our two nations are the closest of neighbours and the closest of friends, and this treaty will elevate our relationship to a formal alliance," he said.

"I look forward to signing the treaty with Prime Minister Marape soon."

Mr Albanese faced criticism last month after failing to ink the agreement during his visit for PNG's 50th anniversary celebrations.

During a press conference last month, both Mr Albanese and Mr Marape said they were confident the signing would happen, despite commentary from some that China was looking to scuttle the deal.

The PNG prime minister said at the time the country was a democracy, not a "military dictatorship" and he needed broad cabinet sign-off.

In a social media post released after Mr Albanese's visit, the Chinese embassy in PNG advised the country not to compromise its independence, urging it to "properly handle issues bearing on its sovereignty and long-term interests".

Despite today's green light, the treaty has faced domestic criticism, with PNG's former defence force commander Jerry Singirok, warning that the long-term implications of the treaty could come at a high cost for the country.

"It's common knowledge that Australia sees China as a potential threat, but China is not PNG's enemy," Mr Singirok told the ABC's Pacific Beat.

"It's a disaster if we enter into this without understanding the long-term implications on our constitution," he said.

'Challenging and difficult' Vanuatu agreement

At the time, the failure to sign the Pukpuk treaty came just days after Mr Albanese failed to sign the Nakamal agreement with Vanuatu.

That agreement would see the federal government pour about $500 million into Vanuatu over a decade to help fund some of its key climate, security and economic priorities — while entrenching Australia's position as the Pacific nation's main security and development partner.

Speaking to the ABC yesterday, Defence Minister Richard Marles described the Nakamal agreement as a "challenging and difficult agreement", but still believed it would be signed.

"There's an enormous amount of goodwill on both sides," he said.

"It's going to take a bit of time to get it done, but I'm confident that will happen as well."

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-10-02/papua-new-guinea-australia-pukpuk-treaty-signed/105843900

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122325

File: c217e856e5ddcd4⋯.jpg (250.21 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 97c89da3942944b⋯.jpg (355.94 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23684632 (020946ZOCT25) Notable: New $5bn helicopters to work with drones on battlefield – Australia’s first two AH-64E Apache attack helicopters have arrived in Townsville under a $5bn deal with the United States for 29 aircraft, despite expert warnings that manned helicopters are increasingly vulnerable to drones and missiles. Defence is also funding a $306m maintenance contract with Boeing Defence Australia, creating 240 jobs, and a $700m RAAF Base upgrade. Deputy PM Richard Marles said the Apaches mark a “critical step change” in Army capability, while Defence Industry Minister Pat Conroy said they’ll support “littoral manoeuvre and long-range strike.” The Apaches will integrate with drones for reconnaissance and fire support.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109369 (pb)

New $5bn helicopters to work with drones on battlefield

SARAH ELKS - 2 October 2025

Australia’s first two Apache attack helicopters have landed in Townsville, the first wave of a $5bn 29-chopper deal with the United States.

Defence is pressing ahead with the new fleet of aircraft, despite warnings from military experts that manned helicopters are vulnerable to missile and drone attack.

A seven-year $306m contract with Boeing Defence Australia for maintenance, engineering, training and logistics for the helicopters will create 240 industry jobs in Queensland including 170 in Townsville, according to Defence.

The federal government is spending another $700m to upgrade the RAAF Base in Townsville for the Apaches, the remaining 27 of which will be delivered by 2029.

Deputy Prime Minister Richard Marles said the AH-64E Apache provided a “critical step change in attack aviation capability for the Australian Army” and was the “most advanced attack helicopter operating today”.

Mr Marles said the investment meant Townsville would be Australia’s largest defence helicopter industry hub.

Defence Industry Minister Pat Conroy said the helicopters would help modernise the defence force for “littoral manoeuvre and long-range strike”.

“The Apache is a critical capability for the Australian Defence Force that will deliver tactical speed, reach, fire power and situational awareness, with the ability to operate across maritime environments,” Mr Conroy said.

According to the Army Research Centre, littoral manoeuvre is the “projection of land power from the sea to the land, which in turn allows land capabilities to influence the sea”.

Army Aviation Command commander David Hafner said the helicopters would be used for reconnaissance, networking, communications and fire support.

Major General Hafner said the Apaches would be able to work closely with “uncrewed aerial systems” – drones – on the battlefield.

In 2023, Japan flagged it would retire its “obsolete” manned helicopters – including the Apache – in favour of unmanned aircraft, and in May, the United States Army announced it would cancel the procurement of “outdated crewed attack aircraft” such as the Apache AH-64D.

The US continues to operate about 200 of the AH-64E choppers, the model Australia has ordered.

Former Defence official Michael Shoebridge said in May that the federal government was being “wilfully, dogmatically insistent” in forging ahead with its $5bn 29-helicopter deal.

“We’re going to be spending increasing amounts of taxpayer money to operate an expensive legacy platform, as our big US partner is downsizing and de-­investing in the very capabilities that we’re starting to buy,” said Mr Shoebridge, the director of Strategic Analysis Australia.

“The opportunity cost is a less-powerful military and one that is far more vulnerable because it is not equipped with large volumes of lethal uncrewed capabilities.”

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/new-5bn-helicopters-to-work-with-drones-on-battlefield/news-story/29fc8f4ab50132524345eed256d00226

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122326

File: aa49db570c1e55d⋯.jpg (3.02 MB,3000x2000,3:2,Clipboard.jpg)

File: ddcc96761a59f5b⋯.jpg (308.62 KB,1078x793,1078:793,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23684666 (021009ZOCT25) Notable: Chinese involvement in Suburban Rail Loop under national security review – The $9bn Suburban Rail Loop East contract is under review by the Foreign Investment Review Board over Chinese state-owned involvement via John Holland, a key member of the preferred TransitLinX consortium. John Holland, owned by China Communications Construction Company since 2015, would help build and operate the $34.5bn line from Cheltenham to Box Hill. FIRB’s review, triggered by national security rules for “critical infrastructure,” could delay the deal’s finalisation. Both John Holland and the Victorian government described the process as routine, though analysts say concerns over data access and Chinese influence could have broader implications for major infrastructure projects.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122244

>>122251

>>122275

>>122293

Chinese involvement in Suburban Rail Loop under national security review

Chip Le Grand - October 2, 2025

1/2

The national security implications of a $9 billion Suburban Rail Loop contract are being examined by the Foreign Investment Review Board after a Victorian government plan to award the deal to a consortium led by a Chinese-owned company.

The review is centred on the involvement of John Holland in the TransitLinX consortium, the government’s preferred bidder for a linewide contract to build, operate and maintain SRL East, a proposed $34.5 billion railway between Cheltenham and Box Hill.

John Holland is long-established in Australia as one of the nation’s largest construction companies and a trusted contractor on Big Build projects in Victoria, but was sold a decade ago to the state-owned China Communications Construction Company (CCCC).

It remains headquartered in Melbourne and has local management and an Australian workforce of about 5000 employees.

Under FIRB’s rules, large public transport networks including passenger rail are listed as “critical infrastructure” and subject to mandatory notification requirements by any foreign companies seeking to invest.

A guidance note issued in 2023, which followed a tightening of Australia’s national security vetting in response to the pandemic, advised that foreign investors must seek approval before starting a business or acquiring a direct interest in an entity which owns or operates a public transport network capable of carrying 5 million passengers a month.

The eastern section of the SRL is forecast to carry 70,000 passengers a day – about 2 million a month – when the underground line opens in 2035.

Two construction industry sources, not authorised to speak about the John Holland review, said the review board was taking a closer look at major infrastructure projects and had started to conduct more regulatory audits due to the prevalence of foreign-backed consortiums.

However, another industry source expressed surprise that FIRB’s interest would be piqued by an operations and maintenance contract – even a $9 billion one – which does not involve John Holland taking an equity stake in the SRL.

The TransitLinX consortium, which this masthead revealed in May was the preferred bidder, comprises John Holland, French-owned public transport operator RATP Dev, French train and tram builder Alstom, US-headquartered engineering company KBR and Canadian professional services group WSP.

The contract, the largest so far to be tendered in connection with the SRL, covers the fitting out of twin, 26-kilometre rail tunnels, the supply of power, communications and signalling, the construction of driverless trains and the stabling yard where they will be housed and maintained, and operating the completed rail network.

The FIRB warned in its 2023 advice that “large and connected public transport networks ... are critical to the functioning of Australia’s economy and any malicious disruption of these networks would have a consequential impact on national security”.

“Some public transport providers also hold large data sets relating to their customers; including billing and information and their public transport usage, which also needs to be appropriately protected from espionage and foreign interference.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122327

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23691945 (040311ZOCT25) Notable: Video: Australian Jewish community devastated by attack at UK synagogue that shows “the risk is real and the fears are justified” – Australia’s Jewish community has expressed grief and fear after the Yom Kippur terrorist attack on a Manchester synagogue that killed two people and injured three. Executive Council of Australian Jewry president Daniel Aghion said the attack “will be felt very deeply here” and shows that “the risk is real and our fears are justified.” Adass Israel board member Benjamin Klein, whose Melbourne synagogue was torched last year in an arson attack allegedly linked to Iran, said the tragedy “could be Melbourne, it could be Manchester.” Prime Minister Anthony Albanese condemned the “heinous attack,” while Rabbi Jacqueline Ninio said Australians of all faiths had reached out to express solidarity with the Jewish community.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122206

Australian Jewish community devastated by attack at UK synagogue that shows 'the risk is real and the fears are justified'

Rudi Maxwell - 3 October 2025

1/2

The Executive Council of Australian Jewry says the attack at a synagogue in Manchester on the holy day of Yom Kippur is devastating.

British police declared Thursday's deadly car and stabbing attack on the synagogue in the UK's north a terrorist incident.

Two people were killed and another three seriously injured.

Deep connections between the Australian and British Jewish communities go back "almost to the first fleet", according to Daniel Aghion, president of the Executive Council of Australian Jewry.

"The attack in Manchester will be felt very deeply here in Australia because of that — and also because of the fact it was a synagogue attacked on Yom Kippur," he told the ABC.

Mr Aghion said that it had been the experience of Jews around the world, including in Australia, that places of worship, gathering and communal spaces are all secured.

Since Hamas attacked Israel on October 7, 2023, that security had "increased remarkably".

"It is an affront to our society that any Australian has to live this way, but it is the reality of what we face as Jews," Mr Aghion said.

"The Manchester attack, together with the firebombing attacks experienced here in Australia, shows that the risk is real and our fears are justified."

He said that the 2019 attack in the Muslim community in Christchurch, New Zealand, played on his mind this morning.

"I'm not saying for a moment that religious hatred is a zero-sum game, but I'm talking about the currently fomented environment that we, as Australians, are currently living in," Mr Aghion said.

The council's co-executive director, Alex Ryvchin, said Yom Kippur was a special holiday for the Jewish faith, with the community already feeling under threat due to a surge in antisemitism in Australia.

"As we walked to and from synagogue yesterday, everyone would have noticed an enormous police presence, cement barriers at traffic lights to prevent car rammings," he said.

"People wonder why.

"This is why ... it's precisely because what happened in the UK."

The peak Jewish body in NSW said the community was shocked by the fatal terrorist attack.

Michele Goldman, from the NSW Jewish Board of Deputies, said the community will be on edge.

"This is our greatest fear that has now been realised in Manchester," she said.

"We have to make sure we are all being very vigilant."

'It could be Melbourne, it could be Manchester'

For members of the Adass Israel congregation in Ripponlea — in Melbourne's inner south-east — the Manchester attack added to the trauma they are still working through after their synagogue was allegedly burnt down by arsonists in December last year.

Two men have been charged by the Victorian Joint Counter Terrorism Team and ASIO investigators have allegedly linked the fire to the Iranian Government.

"It could be Melbourne, it could be Manchester, it could be anywhere in the world, we are feeling this," Adass Israel board member, Benjamin Klein, said.

"Every time it happens then it just refreshes and brings up trauma."

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122328

File: 30ac4700df09662⋯.jpg (473.68 KB,2047x1152,2047:1152,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 693c9a73e1e8af2⋯.jpg (426.61 KB,2048x1536,4:3,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 5ebaedc84372f40⋯.jpg (792.15 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23691985 (040322ZOCT25) Notable: Opposition blasts planned pro-Palestine action at Opera House – Opposition Leader Sussan Ley has condemned a planned pro-Palestine rally at the Sydney Opera House on October 12, calling it “disgusting but not surprising” and accusing organisers of “sowing division” days after the second anniversary of the October 7 terrorist attacks. The Palestine Action Group says the event will demand “an end to genocide in Gaza” and sanctions on Israel, citing the Opera House’s anti-war history. NSW Police are considering the group’s request to hold the rally. Ley urged protesters to back Donald Trump’s Gaza peace plan instead, while NSW Jewish leaders said the demonstration “cannot be allowed to proceed.”

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109475 (pb)

>>109476 (pb)

>>109478 (pb)

Opposition blasts planned pro-Palestine action at Opera House

JOANNA PANAGOPOULOS - October 02, 2025

The federal Opposition Leader Sussan Ley has criticised a pro-Palestine march on the Sydney Opera House planned days after the second anniversary of the October 7 terrorist attack, accusing activists of “continuing to sow division”.

Pro-Palestine organisers Palestine Action Group, who hold rallies in Hyde Park and surrounds each week, are calling on Sydneysiders to join “the massive mobilisation” to the Sydney Opera House on Sunday October 12 “demanding an end to genocide in Gaza” and immediate sanctions on Israel.

Palestine Action Group said the “Opera House has long been a symbol of anti-war protest”, referring to the words “No War” being “emblazoned across its sails in defiance of the Iraq invasion” in 2003, but said the Minns government had “tarnished this legacy by lighting the sails in the colours of Israel’s flag, a genocidal apartheid regime”.

On October 9, 2023, hundreds of people attended a pro-Palestinian rally outside the Sydney Opera House after the NSW Government lit up the sails in the colours of the Israeli flag. The protest descended into chaos as flares were thrown, an Israeli flag was burnt on the steps of the Opera House and the words “f*ck the Jews” were chanted.

Palestine Action Group has submitted a formal notice of intention to hold a public assembly and NSW Police said it was “under consideration”. Police could not say when a decision would be made.

In a post on social media, the protest group said “7 October 2025 marks two years since Israel launched its genocidal campaign against the Palestine people, a campaign which continues to escalate under the protection of Western governments, including the Australian government.”

“The people of this country are united in saying: enough is enough”.

Ms Ley, the Liberal leader, said the planned protest was “disgusting but not surprising”.

“On a day when the Australian Jewish community will be coming together to mark the largest loss of life since the Holocaust the fact these activists will continue to sow division and tear at social cohesion is disgusting but not surprising,” Ms Ley said.

“The Sydney Opera House belongs to all Australians, not activists and protestors. We must resist these efforts to use it as a symbol to sow division.”

She referred President Donald Trump’s peace plan for Gaza, saying “these people should be focusing their voices on calling for Hamas’ terrorists to sign up, lay down their weapons and end the war they started”.

On Thursday, Hamas indicated it was open to accepting the Israel-backed proposal but asked for more time to review the conditions of the plan, according to Arab mediators.

Palestine Action Group organised the at-least 90,000-strong “March for Humanity” Harbour Bridge protest for Palestine in August.

The march from the CBD to North Sydney was led by WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange, and other politicians and activists.

NSW Police had opposed the march, in part because they said they have not been given enough time to prepare proper traffic and crowd management plans. However Justice Belinda Rigg of the NSW Supreme Court ruled the protest could go ahead on Sunday, saying the Palestine Action Group had “ensured that people’s safety was a priority” on previous protest days.

When asked about the action at a press conference on Thursday, NSW Premier Chris Minns said he would “leave it up to NSW Police”.

“They will make the decision based on public safety grounds,” he said. “I’m not going to offer public commentary before they’ve spoken, if for no other reason that I don’t want to draw attention to the organisers who seem to thrive on the notoriety of it all.”

NSW Board of Deputies President David Ossip said the demonstration “cannot be allowed to proceed”.

“Two years ago, whilst innocent Israelis were still being massacred, raped and taken hostage, protesters defiled our iconic Opera House with celebrations and antisemitic chants,” he said.

“Now - at a time when Israel and the Arab and Islamic world have embraced a comprehensive peace plan to end the war - these protesters want to return to the Opera House to continue their demonisation of Israel and the Jewish community. This demonstration cannot be allowed to proceed.”

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/opposition-blasts-planned-propalestine-action-at-opera-house/news-story/ea453f2228478e6b3826e1c15a9e5f3c

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122329

File: 049f7649e3384bd⋯.jpg (317.87 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 30ac4700df09662⋯.jpg (473.68 KB,2047x1152,2047:1152,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 03cbef1ec03da1e⋯.jpg (217.15 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: aa60f4dc5398c10⋯.jpg (161.26 KB,2047x1152,2047:1152,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23691998 (040326ZOCT25) Notable: NSW Police cite ‘public safety concerns’ in effort to block Opera House rally – NSW Police have asked the Supreme Court to move a planned October 12 pro-Palestine rally from the Sydney Opera House, warning that “heightened public emotion” and crowd size could pose safety risks. Justice Desmond Fagan said a large turnout of “strongly motivated people” pressing toward the Opera House could lead to “a disaster.” Police estimate attendance could reach 100,000 and cited “engineering concerns” about the forecourt’s capacity. Premier Chris Minns backed police caution, while Opposition Leader Sussan Ley called the protest “completely counter-productive.” A hearing on whether the rally can proceed will be held Tuesday.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122328

NSW Police cite ‘public safety concerns’ in effort to block Opera House rally

JACK NIVISON - 3 October 2025

A Supreme Court judge says it could lead to “disaster” if thousands of “strongly motivated people” ­attempt to converge on the Sydney Opera House, as police work to relocate a pro-Palestine rally planned for the weekend following the second anniversary of the October 7 attacks.

Police have referred the proposal for the rally to the NSW ­Supreme Court, citing “heightened public emotion” as a factor in their request to have the protest moved.

Palestine Action Group said it expected upwards of 10,000 people to join the march on October 12 from the CBD to the Opera House forecourt.

However, at a last-minute summons before the Supreme Court on Friday afternoon, police said there could be anywhere between 10,000 and 100,000 people attending the protest, and there were “engineering concerns” about whether the Opera House forecourt could even hold that many people.

Duty judge, Justice Desmond Fagan said the Harbour Bridge march, where a “broad proportion of the community” came out to express sentiments of “distress and outrage about the events in Gaza”, created “difficulties of its own”.

He said the October 12 protest would see people essentially “go to a cul-de-sac” and asked the lawyer representing the Palestine Action Group whether that would be “practical”.

Mahmud Hawila for the Palestine Action Group said it would be practical if there was appropriate crowd management.

Justice Fagan responded that if there were “large numbers of very strongly motivated people” trying to “press themselves to the centre of the Opera House, you’ll have a ­disaster”.

A two-hour hearing will be held on Tuesday before a different judge.

Palestine Action Group has run protests in Hyde Park every Sunday for the past two years, but rose to national prominence when it led more than 90,000 people across the Harbour Bridge during the March for Humanity.

Assistant Police Commissioner Peter McKenna on Friday said public safety was a major factor in police refer the matter to court.

“We understand that this is a significant anniversary for probably both sides … there’s heightened public emotion around this and we understand it,” he said.

“We’re not anti-protest, we facilitate thousands of protests and, in fact, with this particular group, we’ve been ­facilitating protests and public ­assemblies for the last two years.”

He said the Opera House’s position and layout meant large groups would have to exit via “pinch points” which would be exacerbated in the event of an emergency.

Protest organisers will face an “extra hurdle” in their attempts to overcome the state’s objection to the march, because of laws banning trespassing on Sydney Opera House grounds, administrative law specialist Mark Robinson SC told The Australian.

“The Opera House is a completely different ballgame to the Harbour Bridge. It’s not a public place, it’s a private place,” he said.

“If you trespass with intent to cause damage or disrupt the operations of the Opera House, you run the risk of being imprisoned.”

NSW Premier Chris Minns said of the hundreds of protests that take place in NSW each year, the “vast, vast majority” go off without a hitch, thanks, in part, to police ­efforts.

“They’re peaceful protests. Police facilitate, often a march or a protest taking place, but you have to appreciate they’re in a difficult situation and when people break the law, even if it started off as a peaceful, lawful protest, they’ve got to take action,” he said.

“They don’t do that easily and they don’t do that in a way that’s ... arbitrary. They do it to keep the rest of the public safe.”

Federal Opposition Leader Sussan Ley said the protest would be “completely counter-productive”.

“(Pro-Palestinian protests) do come from a place of division and hatred, and that is not acceptable, and it certainly isn’t acceptable for the Sydney Opera House to be used as a backdrop for protests,” she said.

Executive Council of Australian Jewry president Daniel Aghion said “attacks on the Jewish community” would be “celebrated and affirmed” if the Opera House protest went ahead.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/nsw-police-cite-public-safety-concerns-in-effort-to-block-opera-house-rally/news-story/c1c7ed65d11010b0fc0f9ecdc3ac0a0a

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122330

File: dc0c051b2e1db5a⋯.jpg (248.78 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 1dc2dea4d5e86b1⋯.jpg (334.6 KB,2047x1152,2047:1152,Clipboard.jpg)

File: eeaf2cc946d072b⋯.jpg (201.2 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23692093 (040346ZOCT25) Notable: Video: Papua New Guinea may sit out potential conflict between Australia and China despite Pukpuk defence treaty – Papua New Guinea Prime Minister James Marape says there is a “high possibility” his country would not join a conflict involving Australia and China, despite the new Pukpuk mutual defence treaty. He told the ABC’s 7.30 that while the treaty commits both nations to “act to meet the common danger,” each retains sovereign decision-making. “We don’t expect Australia to drop everything and run to us,” Marape said, adding PNG would urge “peace, not war.” He ruled out Australian bases in PNG and said the treaty does not apply to potential border conflicts with Indonesia.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122272

>>122292

>>122324

James Marape’s cabinet green lights PNG-Australia defence treaty in big win for Albanese

BEN PACKHAM - October 02, 2025

1/2

Anthony Albanese will walk into a White House meeting with Donald Trump in just over a fortnight with a landmark defence treaty tying Papua New Guinea to the West in a major blow to China’s strategic ambitions in the South Pacific.

The Prime Minister and his PNG counterpart James Marape are set to sign the mutual defence agreement on Monday after attending Sunday’s NRL grand final in Sydney, overcoming a setback last month that saw Mr Albanese return from Port Moresby without inking the deal.

The treaty, compelling both countries to “act to meet the common danger” if either comes under attack, will provide a vital strategic buffer for Australia and open the way for up to 10,000 Papua New Guineans to join the Australian Defence Force amid a long-running workforce crisis.

As revealed by The Australian, PNG’s cabinet endorsed the historic Pukpuk treaty at a meeting on Wednesday with an “absolute majority”, paving the way for it to be signed by the leaders and ratified by both countries’ parliaments.

Mr Albanese welcomed the development, declaring: “Our two nations are the closest of neighbours and the closest of friends, and this treaty will elevate our relationship to a formal alliance.

“I look forward to signing the treaty with Prime Minister Marape soon.”

Mr Marape said the treaty “reflects the depth of trust, history, and shared future” between PNG and Australia, and would allow his country to modernise and strengthen its defence capabilities “across all domains”.

“Today, Australia remains our single biggest bilateral partner, and consistent with our past, we are shaping our future,” the PNG Prime Minister said.

He flagged a push, with Australia’s help, to establish a new special forces capability, and acquire new military aircraft.

“This treaty strengthens PNG’s security and defence capacities as we embark on the next 50 years,” he said.

“It is about ensuring Papua New Guinea is safe, secure, and prepared to protect its people and borders.”

The signing of the treaty will be a major diplomatic win for Mr Albanese and follows his success in clinching a bilateral meeting with the US President, scheduled for October 20 in Washington DC.

The Prime Minister will be able to sell the deal to Mr Trump as a win for the longtime allies that will lock out Beijing from one of the region’s most strategically located countries and protect US forces deployed in Australia if war breaks out.

The green light from PNG’s cabinet followed its failure to approve the agreement last month because the country’s 50th anniversary of independence celebrations prevented it achieving a quorum.

Mr Albanese and Mr Marape instead signed a communique committing to progress the treaty, but there were fears China could use its influence to scuttle the agreement, as it was suspected of doing with a hoped-for security deal with Vanuatu that was shelved last month.

The signing of the treaty in coming days will come ahead of a “roadshow” by PNG’s Defence Minister Billy Joseph to explain the deal with regional partners, beginning with his Chinese counterpart.

Dr Joseph declared in a Facebook post on Thursday morning: “Peace must be achieved through strength.

“No nation must be at its knees begging for mercy when it comes to matters of sovereignty, independence and territorial integrity. Military strength is achieved through conscious investment in our defence forces balanced by our strategic security alliances.”

Beijing had already warned PNG against signing a deal that was “exclusive in nature” and that prevented it from “co-operating with a third party”.

“We hope that the PNG side will continue to uphold independence and self-reliance, properly handle issues bearing on its sovereignty and long-term interests, and work with China to maintain the sound development of China-PNG relations and mutually beneficial co-operation,” the Chinese Embassy in Port Moresby said.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122331

File: eeaf2cc946d072b⋯.jpg (201.2 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 18f64066fc72137⋯.jpg (289.93 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 1bbc0d9248658a1⋯.jpg (282.96 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23692127 (040354ZOCT25) Notable: Video: Papua New Guinea may sit out potential conflict between Australia and China despite Pukpuk defence treaty – Papua New Guinea Prime Minister James Marape says there is a “high possibility” his country would not join a conflict involving Australia and China, despite the new Pukpuk mutual defence treaty. He told the ABC’s 7.30 that while the treaty commits both nations to “act to meet the common danger,” each retains sovereign decision-making. “We don’t expect Australia to drop everything and run to us,” Marape said, adding PNG would urge “peace, not war.” He ruled out Australian bases in PNG and said the treaty does not apply to potential border conflicts with Indonesia.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122272

>>122292

>>122324

>>122330

10,000 troops and special forces: How the PNG military treaty works

BEN PACKHAM - October 02, 2025

Australia’s Pukpuk treaty with PNG will open the way for up to 10,000 Papua New Guineans to serve in the Australian Defence Force, and for PNG to establish new special forces and air force capabilities.

PNG Prime Minister James Marape said the agreement, to be signed on Monday, would strengthen PNG’s defence capabilities “across all domains”, allowing his country to “protect its people and borders”.

The mutual defence treaty, named for the PNG Pidgin word for “crocodile”, would elevate the nations’ relationship to a genuine alliance, requiring both countries to “act to meet the common danger” if either was attacked.

A copy of the treaty obtained by The Australian confirms that, when signed and ratified, it will prevent China from signing any sort of security-related agreement with PNG. “The parties agree they shall not put in place activities, agreements or arrangements with third parties that would compromise their ability to implement this treaty,” it says.

The document paves the way for both nations to recruit each other’s citizens to their defence forces, with Mr Marape revealing on Monday that provisions would be made “for up to 10,000 Papua New Guineans to serve with the Australian Defence Force”.

The recruitment boost will be vital for the ADF, which is facing a long running workforce crisis.

Australia will spend billions of dollars under the agreement modernising PNG’s defence capabilities, with the document committing the parties to “enhanced capability, interoperability and integration”.

Mr Marape said this would include “strengthened land forces and the establishment of special forces arrangements”; “enhanced air force capacity through new capabilities and training”; and “increased capacity to police PNG’s vast maritime borders”.

He said the deal would allow PNG to expand its defence force to 7000 personnel from its current 4000 troops, and build a new reserve force of 3000 personnel.

“Our defence force will always report to the Commander of the PNG Defence Force. Australians, including Papua New Guineans enlisted into the Australian Defence Force, will report to the Australian commander,” he said.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/10000-troops-and-special-forces-how-the-png-military-treaty-works/news-story/7a8085e99e16ac7b5803c9f86ce4e686

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122332

File: 140b6a45360f4ae⋯.jpg (2.48 MB,3000x2000,3:2,Clipboard.jpg)

File: bc457d18f722715⋯.jpg (3.53 MB,3000x2000,3:2,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 13f089c6bf3ef32⋯.jpg (101.32 KB,1080x1346,540:673,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23692244 (040429ZOCT25) Notable: Andrew Hastie quits Sussan Ley’s frontbench – Shadow Home Affairs Minister Andrew Hastie has resigned from Sussan Ley’s frontbench, saying he could no longer remain silent on immigration policy after being sidelined from developing the Coalition’s stance. On Instagram, Hastie said, “The leader has made it clear that the shadow home affairs minister won’t lead the Coalition’s response to immigration matters… I am resigning from the frontbench.” Ley rejected his version, saying Hastie quit after refusing to comply with shadow cabinet solidarity rules. His departure deepens instability for Ley, who faces disunity on net zero and migration and has recently lost Jacinta Nampijinpa Price from her frontbench.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109564

Andrew Hastie quits Sussan Ley’s frontbench

Paul Sakkal - October 3, 2025

Andrew Hastie has stunned colleagues and quit the Liberal frontbench on Friday after staking out his own nationalist agenda on migration, manufacturing and net zero.

Hastie, who had been the opposition’s home affairs spokesman, phoned Opposition Leader Sussan Ley to inform her on Friday. Sources said the Western Australian told her he could no longer maintain shadow cabinet solidarity.

On Instagram, Hastie claimed he had been sidelined from developing the Coalition’s policy on immigration, which this masthead’s Resolve Political Monitor has found half of voters say is too high, far more than those who believe it is at the correct level.

“The leader has made it clear that the shadow home affairs minister won’t lead the Coalition’s response to immigration matters or develop the Coalition’s immigration policy,” Hastie said.

“On this basis, I made the decision that I was not able to continue in this role and remain silent on immigration.

“Therefore out of respect for Sussan’s leadership, I am resigning from the frontbench.

“Sussan deserves the opportunity to lead, unencumbered by interventions from shadow cabinet colleagues, especially as the Coalition builds out a policy platform for the 2028 election.”

In a statement after touching down on the east coast from Hastie’s state of Perth, where the pair did not appear in public together, Ley contradicted Hastie, saying he raised no policy matters with her.

Instead, according to Ley, Hastie said he could not agree to shadow cabinet solidarity as outlined in letters she sent her frontbench earlier this week, as first reported by this masthead.

Ley said she had spoken to her frontbench and issued expectations to them this week, informing them they were bound by conventions of solidarity, including on public commentary and votes in parliament.

“This expectation is not new and is a fundamental feature of our Westminster system of government,” Ley said in a statement. “Compliance with this convention has always been a prerequisite for serving in both cabinet and shadow cabinet.”

“Today, Mr Hastie informed me via telephone that he would be unable to comply with this longstanding and well-understood requirement, and on that basis he would be resigning his position as shadow minister for home affairs.

“Mr Hastie did not raise any matters relating to policy on this call. I thanked Mr Hastie for his service, and assured him he would continue to be a very valued part of my Coalition team.”

One Liberal source said colleagues had tried to get Hastie to hold off so that he could lead the Coalition’s response to the arrival of so-called ISIS brides on Friday.

Hastie has been telling colleagues he is not interested in an imminent leadership challenge.

However, the move adds to internal instability for Ley and allows Hastie to be even more outspoken than he has been in recent weeks as he has differentiated from Ley on net zero and immigration policy.

Hastie will now sit on the backbench with a group of outspoken MPs scorned by Ley or opposed to her on key policies, including Jacinta Nampijinpa Price, Jane Hume, Sarah Henderson, Barnaby Joyce and Michael McCormack.

Ley has the numbers in the party room and the Right is split on whether Hastie or Angus Taylor, whom Ley defeated to claim the leadership, should be the next conservative challenger.

Key right-wingers such as James Paterson and Jonathon Duniam back Ley’s leadership along with the moderates and centre-right, meaning she remains safe for now.

But with a looming debate on net zero and the second high-profile departure from her frontbench after Price was dumped weeks ago, Ley sits in a precarious position.

https://www.theage.com.au/politics/federal/andrew-hastie-quits-sussan-ley-s-frontbench-20251003-p5mzzl.html

https://www.instagram.com/andrewhastiemp/p/DPV163_EWLm/

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122333

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23693846 (050105ZOCT25) Notable: ‘It’s pretty simple’: Hastie says resignation not about leadership push – (Video) Andrew Hastie has denied any plan to challenge Opposition Leader Sussan Ley, saying his resignation from the frontbench was “pretty simple” — he could not lead the Coalition’s immigration policy as shadow home affairs minister. “There’s no challenge to Sussan. I support Sussan,” he told reporters in Perth, adding that he wanted freedom to speak “with conviction and integrity” on key issues. Ley said Hastie quit after refusing to observe shadow cabinet solidarity rules. Senator James Paterson, now acting home affairs spokesperson, called the move “honourable,” while Nationals leader David Littleproud praised Hastie’s “principled stand.”

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122218

>>122332

‘It’s pretty simple’: Hastie says resignation not about leadership push

Nick Newling - October 4, 2025

1/2

Andrew Hastie said he has no intention of challenging Opposition Leader Sussan Ley’s leadership, and remained committed to the Liberal Party despite his resignation from the frontbench on Friday night.

During a press conference in Perth on Saturday morning, Hastie said his resignation as the opposition’s home affairs spokesperson was “pretty simple”, repeatedly stating that he supported Ley and had stepped down because he was unable to steer the party’s immigration policy.

“I was the senior lead for the portfolio – immigration is a core responsibility of home affairs – and so when it was made clear that I wouldn’t have any leadership in that role, I thought it was time for me to depart,” Hastie told journalists in Perth.

“It’s pretty simple, guys, that’s why I’m fronting up. There’s no challenge to Sussan. I support Sussan. Tried to do this in good faith, and here we are,” Hastie said.

On Friday evening Hastie released a statement saying he was resigning from the Coalition frontbench because he had come to understand he would not be leading the opposition’s immigration policy development as home affairs spokesperson. The statement wished Ley well, saying she “deserves the opportunity to lead, unencumbered by interventions from shadow cabinet colleagues”.

However, a conflicting statement from Ley also released on Friday night said Hastie resigned because he was unable to comply with a “shadow ministerial solidarity convention” that tied members of the opposition frontbench in both public commentary and parliamentary votes. Ley said Hastie “did not raise any matters relating to policy” when he called her to resign.

Hastie downplayed the difference in statements, saying: “The language I used in my statement did not exceed the language that she used in her charter letter … There isn’t a disparity. It was just very clear that I’m not, that I was not going to be having a lead in immigration policy.”

He explained the “radio silence” his colleagues said they experienced from him in the days preceding his resignation, saying: “I had some leave earlier in the week, a bit of a medical procedure myself. Won’t go into detail there … I was just busy on school holidays with my kids, recovering ... [Ley] knew I was on leave, so there’s no scuttlebutt here.”

Hastie said he kept conversations about the decision “exceptionally limited” before resigning, out of respect for Ley, and had primarily made the decision so he could speak his mind on issues of importance to him, such as immigration.

“If you serve in the parliament, you’ve got to do it with conviction and integrity, and I want to speak out on issues like immigration because I think it’s really important ... That’s the beauty of being a backbench member,” Hastie said.

While denying there was a challenge to Ley’s leadership afoot, Hastie praised advice provided to him from former prime minister Tony Abbott to not seek the leadership but to keep it within striking distance.

“I think that’s good advice from Tony. Who wouldn’t. Who wouldn’t stick to that?”

His defection is the second major change to the opposition frontbench since the May election. Less than a month ago, Senator Jacinta Nampijinpa Price was sacked from her role as defence industry spokesperson after failing to back Ley’s leadership and a week-long saga over comments she made about Indian migrants.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122334

File: d37ddc5e72d2406⋯.jpg (3.84 MB,2000x2667,2000:2667,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 854b9b1edfedf7b⋯.jpg (162.48 KB,1056x1080,44:45,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 60800a5a891b592⋯.jpg (2.48 MB,2000x1332,500:333,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 0613599427b0d68⋯.jpg (2.89 MB,2000x1500,4:3,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 3ace2d8a6df57fc⋯.jpg (388.01 KB,1046x843,1046:843,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23694411 (050335ZOCT25) Notable: Police ramp up search for Dezi Freeman near Mount Buffalo as manhunt enters 37th day – Nearly 100 additional officers and cadaver dogs have joined the search for alleged police killer Dezi Freeman in dense bushland near Mount Buffalo, Victoria. Freeman was last seen after the August 26 shootings of Senior Constable Vadim de Waart-Hottart and Detective Leading Senior Constable Neal Thompson at Porepunkah. Police have sealed off parts of Mount Buffalo National Park amid difficult weather and terrain, following false leads in Goomalibee and Undera. Local businesses continue to suffer from the prolonged operation, with some yet to receive promised state support. Freeman remains at large despite one of Victoria’s largest manhunts.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109588 (pb)

>>122153

>>122185

>>122309

Police ramp up search for Dezi Freeman near Mount Buffalo as manhunt enters 37th day

Hannah Hammoud - October 2, 2025

Nearly 100 extra officers and cadaver dogs have swept bushland near Porepunkah, as the search for alleged police murderer Dezi Freeman continues.

The search is part of a flurry of police activity in Victoria’s north-east in recent days.

The bushland at Mount Buffalo is where Freeman was last sighted after the shooting deaths of Senior Constable Vadim de Waart-Hottart, 35, and Detective Leading Senior Constable Neal Thompson, 59, at a rural property in Porepunkah on August 26.

Images released by police on Thursday show officers in high-visibility clothing forming a line while combing the dense undergrowth, and scouring paddocks near the mountain.

This week’s operation near Porepunkah also involved specialist search dogs from Queensland Police, which a Victoria Police spokesperson confirmed were cadaver dogs.

“We are following up all possible avenues,” they said.

A no-entry sign, barriers and tape barred access to the Mount Buffalo National Park on the outskirts of Porepunkah on Thursday afternoon as police continued their search for Freeman in intermittent rain and single-digit temperatures.

An LED screen by the main gate on Mount Buffalo Road displayed the words “National Park closed” together with a yellow warning sign.

This masthead was unable to see the officers combing the mountainous terrain, home to sheer cliffs, dense bush and granite tors.

The latest search at Mount Buffalo comes a day after police converged on a property in Goomalibee – an hour west of Porepunkah – and intercepted a man in the town of Undera, a further 80 kilometres west.

Both the property and the man intercepted were cleared of involvement in the Freeman case.

“It follows intensive searches conducted by tactical police over the last several weeks,” police said in a statement.

On Wednesday, officers swooped on the property in Goomalibee, down a narrow country road lined with mature gum trees and blooming canola fields.

Specialist police units, including as many as 20 police vehicles and a helicopter, were deployed as part of the planned operation on Wednesday afternoon.

By Thursday morning, there was no sign of investigators at the property which features a long driveway that leads to a small collection of buildings and sheds surrounded by paddocks.

Police said Thursday’s movements were part of the ongoing investigation, continuing work by detectives to explore all avenues of inquiry.

Sharon Purcell, a Goomalibee farmer, reported seeing “a whole lot of unmarked police cars” stationed on a driveway at her neighbouring property.

Speaking to this masthead on Wednesday, she said she had not received any information from police about the operation before first noticing emergency services in the area about 2.45pm.

“The chopper’s gone now, it might have been up there for an hour,” she said. “It just about sent my cattle crazy. There’s a heap of bloody vehicles, I’ve probably seen about 20.”

Other Goomalibee neighbours, who did not want to be identified, reported seeing about a dozen police cars and a couple of ambulances on Wednesday afternoon.

They said the police helicopter flew up and down over Broken Creek for a couple of hours before heading off.

The police vehicles stayed in the area until after dark.

One resident said police would not tell them what was going on.

“I made sure I locked every door,” they said.

De Waart-Hottart and Thompson were part of a group attempting to serve Freeman with a warrant over alleged historical sex abuse when they died.

Another detective was seriously wounded in the incident.

Freeman then fled into nearby bushland and has not been seen since, despite a search involving hundreds of police that has gone on for more than a month.

Police confirmed earlier this week they had scaled back that operation.

The renewed search near Porepunkah comes as the region continues to struggle with economic downturn as a result of the police search.

Marcus Warner, the president of the Bright and District Chamber of Commerce, said struggling businesses in Porepunkah were yet to receive financial assistance from the state government, following an announcement on September 15 that $5000 grants would be made available to eligible local operators.

“[They] have only received a single email yesterday evening to say they’re working on it still,” Warner said.

“There are businesses that have made no income since the day the incident unfolded.”

https://www.theage.com.au/national/victoria/man-cleared-of-link-to-fugitive-dezi-freeman-after-search-near-benalla-20251002-p5mzig.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122335

File: 1002b387e8f47ed⋯.jpg (188.48 KB,1280x720,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: d0d4f7b1cce6f05⋯.jpg (186.4 KB,1440x810,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23694978 (050833ZOCT25) Notable: How Dassi, Elly and Nicole survived Malka Leifer – The new documentary 'Surviving Malka Leifer' revisits the sexual abuse endured by sisters Dassi Erlich, Elly Sapper and Nicole Meyer at Melbourne’s Adass Israel School, exposing both the depth of their trauma and the system that protected their abuser. Directed by Adam Kamien, the film traces the sisters’ lives from their abusive childhood through the decade-long struggle to extradite Leifer from Israel, where she fled with the school’s support. It features revelations from their 2023 Melbourne trial, where Leifer was found guilty of abusing Dassi and Elly but acquitted of charges relating to Nicole. The documentary portrays the sisters’ resilience, the emotional complexity of their pursuit of justice, and their enduring pain, showing how the scars of abuse persist long after a legal verdict is reached.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109518 (pb)

How Dassi, Elly and Nicole survived Malka Leifer

A new documentary of the Leifer abuse scandal gives fresh voice to the three sisters’ individual and shared experiences.

MICHAEL VISONTAY - 29 September 2025

1/2

So much has been written about the Malka Leifer case.

The Adass community’s obstruction of justice and Kafkaesque campaign to extradite Leifer became an international scandal. Blanket media coverage left no aspect of her heinous behaviour unexamined. Shortly after the trial, Dassi Erlich released her memoir, revealing new layers of harrowing detail about her family background and the lingering impact of Leifer’s crimes.

So when I sat down to watch Adam Kamien’s upcoming documentary, Surviving Malka Leifer, I wondered what more could be said to add to our understanding of the sexual abuse the Adass school principal perpetrated against Erlich and her sisters Elly Sapper and Nicole Meyer.

One and a half hours later, my concerns had dissipated, swept aside by a piece of forensic storytelling and great emotional power. Kamien’s doco has three great strengths. First, it tells the whole story, from start to finish, in one tight narrative. Second, it contains a series of revelations that were not previously in the public domain, or had not received much prominence.

Third and most importantly, it presents the Leifer saga through the eyes and voices of all three sisters, equally. This is a singular achievement. Because Dassi Erlich was the first to speak out about Leifer’s abuse, hers was the central face and voice of the campaign, even after her sisters decided to speak out and join forces with her.

Kamien deserves credit for reflecting their individual and shared experiences. He has captured the nuances of their relationships (one sister observes that for all their closeness, they don’t hug each other), the differences in their personalities and the ways they have each been affected.

Sisters' abusive parents

An underlying theme is the crucial role their abusive family background played in the saga. Their mother abused them physically for minor infractions and regularly deprived them of food; their father was also “not a safe person”, Elly says. The children grew up living in fear of their parents, which made them vulnerable to Leifer’s predatory behaviour in the first place. They saw the Adass school as a safe haven, which Leifer exploited ruthlessly.

Their isolation from the wider world, which was a feature of both their family upbringing and the school’s ultra-Orthodox values, exacerbated their vulnerability. They didn’t even know the words for female genitalia, former Victorian Premier Ted Baillieu, a close supporter of the sisters, reveals on camera.

Baillieu tells of how he accompanied Dassi to a meeting with Adass to ask Adass for an apology. The school used the advice of its insurer’s lawyer as an excuse not to give an apology at the time. It never gave her one.

By that stage, Leifer had fled to Israel, courtesy of the school’s support, where she lived as a free woman for more than a decade, during which she also abused other young girls in the ultra-Orthodox West Bank settlement where she lived with her family.

During this period, her supporters employed mafia-style tactics to intimidate the three sisters. Their older sister Dalia, who was a principal at an ultra-Orthodox school in Manchester, received a visit from two men from Israel. Dalia was told that if she didn’t convince her sisters to withdraw their police statements, her family would be ostracised. The two men met with her boss, and pressured him to fire her. Dalia refused to ask her sisters to back down. (Tragically, soon after this episode, Dalia started having chest pains and later died.)

The Adass network then flexed its political muscle: Israel’s Deputy Health Minister, Yaacov Litzman, a member of the Hasidic community, repeatedly intervened in the justice process to pressure a psychiatric panel to declare Leifer mentally unfit to stand trial and be extradited back to Australia.

When Leifer finally faced her reckoning before a Melbourne court, the sisters moved into an apartment together to give each other support. In this goldfish bowl, they speak candidly to Kamien about their raw feelings during the daily inquisition by Leifer’s defence lawyer.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122336

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23694981 (050837ZOCT25) Notable: Video: Dassi Erlich, Nicole Meyer and Elly Sapper - The three sisters who fought back - Three sisters who exposed Malka Leifer’s abuse break their silence in a new Stan documentary, tracing their fight for justice across 15 years. - A Current Affair

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122335

Dassi Erlich, Nicole Meyer and Elly Sapper - The three sisters who fought back

A Current Affair

Sep 27, 2025

Three sisters who exposed Malka Leifer’s abuse break their silence in a new Stan documentary, tracing their fight for justice across 15 years.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nivkoZ3Gbwk

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122337

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23694984 (050839ZOCT25) Notable: OPINION: Surviving Malka Leifer“Sometimes almost unbearably sad, Surviving Malka Leifer offers a gripping look at trauma and resilience through the eyes of three sisters… Director Adam Kamien keeps the focus on them throughout… The result is an unflinching focus on the toll their struggle took on them; it’s a deeply personal story that at times is hard to bear. One of the more startling facts is how the abuse began well before the sisters went to high school… ‘Fear and hunger’ is how one sister describes the overwhelming emotions of her childhood… The sisters’ bravery is undeniable throughout this documentary. At times, their strength is the only thing that makes this story bearable; the extent of Leifer’s abuse is often shocking, the damage done heartbreaking. The positive is that despite it all, the trio stood up to power, demanded justice, and achieved it.” – Anthony Morris, ScreenHub

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122335

>>122336

Surviving Malka Leifer review: a compelling tale of horror and bravery

Sometimes almost unbearably sad, Surviving Malka Leifer offers a gripping look at trauma and resilience through the eyes of three sisters.

Anthony Morris - 3 Oct 2025

1/2

The Malka Leifer story is so big and sprawling it’s hard to know where to begin.

Maybe with the ultra-Orthodox Adass Jewish community in Melbourne, so tight-knit that almost all the 300 families that belong to it live within four city blocks in East St Kilda? With the school where as principal Malka Liefer repeatedly abused her students and teachers? With the hunt for Leifer, who went on the run and spent over a decade hiding out halfway around the world? With the trial where she finally faced justice and her accusers?

Surviving Malka Leifer starts with the victims. As Leifer’s trial begins, sisters Dassi Erlich, Nicole Meyer and Elly Sapper move into a hotel near the Melbourne court where they’ll be giving evidence. As victims of Leifer, they have to repeatedly go over the details of what was done to them in order to testify; as grown women with families of their own, they’re constantly being drawn back to relive their childhood trauma.

Director Adam Kamien keeps the focus on them throughout. Interviews with the sisters together and separately, plus their extensive video diaries (this documentary was filmed over a five year period), enable him to provide their side of the story right the way through. The result is an unflinching focus on the toll their struggle took on them; it’s a deeply personal story that at times is hard to bear.

Surviving Malka Leifer: startling facts

One of the more startling facts is how the abuse began well before the sisters went to high school. At home they were beaten, starved and emotionally abused by their parents: ‘fear and hunger’ is how one sister describes the overwhelming emotions of her childhood. Using a doll house – and at times, a giant spider – to visualise this period in their lives, it’s confronting viewing even if you’re familiar with the details of the case.

In the Adass community, boys and girls are basically segregated, with the girls groomed for a future as someone’s wife. Teaching literary and numeracy to girls is kept to government minimums; most of the education they receive at school is religious, with the girls given extra days off to help at home around religious holidays.

‘School was a haven for us, in comparison to our home life,’ says one sister; Liefer, with the eye to vulnerability that many predators have, took advantage of what they were going through. A small amount of attention and care was all it took to win the girls over.

In 2008, Dassi’s claims of sexual abuse were brought to a teacher. As part of the Adass approach of keeping things ‘in-house’, the school board didn’t go to the police. Instead, they confronted Liefer, who denied the claims. Later that day, the wife of a school board member helped Liefer flee to Israel.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122338

File: 85b7fefca79c3ce⋯.jpg (4.06 MB,3000x2000,3:2,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23699103 (060850ZOCT25) Notable: Libs inch towards net zero deal as Hastie leak stirs discontent – The Coalition is edging toward a compromise on climate policy after Andrew Hastie’s resignation, as leaks revealed Peter Dutton accused him of “going on strike” and poor policy work. Senior Liberals urged unity, with James Paterson saying consensus on a “national interest first” net zero plan was near. The deal would retain a 2050 target but remove it from law and exempt farmers and heavy industry. Nationals leader David Littleproud called for calm, while Nick Minchin confirmed Dutton discussed defence policy in the election review. Ted O’Brien and Scott Morrison backed Sussan Ley’s leadership and urged focus on economic discipline.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122332

>>122333

Libs inch towards net zero deal as Hastie leak stirs discontent

Paul Sakkal - October 6, 2025

1/2

The Coalition is inching towards a compromise deal to keep the party together on climate change following the exit of net zero opponent Andrew Hastie, as MPs call for unity following the leak of Peter Dutton’s scathing assessment of Hastie’s performance last term.

The opposition’s dirty linen was aired on Monday as this masthead revealed that Dutton, who led the historic loss in May, was highly critical of Hastie’s work ethic and policy development in his private submissions delivered to the party’s election review in July.

Senior Liberals called for leaks to stop so that the party could focus on getting its policies sorted out, including its new position on the net zero by 2050 target.

Frontbencher James Paterson said the Coalition had good prospects of settling on a climate policy, reflecting growing hopes within the party room that Ley could retain the net zero target, with stronger caveats about the economic impacts.

“I think we have a good chance of settling a consensus within the Liberal and National parties that puts our national interests first, that is economically sustainable and that is politically viable,” Paterson said on Sky News.

“We have to compete in not just the inner cities, but in the middle suburbs of our major cities.”

This masthead reported on September 10 that Ley and MPs close to her in the moderate and Right faction were putting together a package that would retain a net zero target. To make the deal palatable for Coalition MPs, the plans under consideration included stripping the net zero goal from law, exempting farmers and energy-intensive smelters from onerous rules, and turning the 2050 target to a looser goal that did not stipulate a date.

Such a compromise would likely be criticised by climate groups and cast as weak by Labor, but would provide Ley with a political pathway through the poisonous policy debate that contributed to Hastie’s move to the backbench.

National Party leader David Littleproud pleaded with his Coalition partners to stop internal warfare.

“We want the Liberal Party to do better,” Littleproud said. “The reality is if you’re focused on yourself, the Australian people won’t be focused on you.”

Election reviewer and former senator Nick Minchin – who interviewed Dutton for the review in July alongside former NSW minister Pru Goward – confirmed they talked to Dutton about the party’s defence policy and did not deny Dutton scrutinised Hastie’s role as defence spokesman. The defence policy, announced late and with little detail, was criticised when it was released 10 days before the election.

Minchin declined to divulge details of the conversation with Dutton but played down Dutton’s critique of Hastie.

“Peter avoided direct criticism of his shadow ministers in the course of his discussion with us,” Minchin told this masthead.

“We discussed inter alia the defence policy and the policy formulation process generally.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122339

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23699110 (060858ZOCT25) Notable: Video: Papua New Guinea may sit out potential conflict between Australia and China despite Pukpuk defence treaty – Papua New Guinea Prime Minister James Marape says there is a “high possibility” his country would not join a conflict involving Australia and China, despite the new Pukpuk mutual defence treaty. He told the ABC’s 7.30 that while the treaty commits both nations to “act to meet the common danger,” each retains sovereign decision-making. “We don’t expect Australia to drop everything and run to us,” Marape said, adding PNG would urge “peace, not war.” He ruled out Australian bases in PNG and said the treaty does not apply to potential border conflicts with Indonesia.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122272

>>122292

>>122324

>>122330

>>122331

Australia and Papua New Guinea sign landmark alliance vowing to defend each other in conflict

Stephen Dziedzic - 6 October 2025

1/2

Papua New Guinea and Australia have formally signed a landmark new "Pukpuk" defence treaty, elevating the bilateral relationship between the two countries to an alliance and agreeing that they will "act to meet the common danger" if the other is faced with an armed attack.

Prime ministers Anthony Albanese and James Marape put pen to paper shortly before midday on Monday in Canberra, officially sealing the pact less than three weeks after an abortive attempt in Port Moresby just after PNG's 50th independence commemorations.

The document confirms mutual defence provisions first revealed by the ABC last month, saying "each Party recognises that an armed attack on either of the Parties within the Pacific would be dangerous to each other's peace and security and the security of the Pacific," and promising they would "act together to meet the common danger, in accordance with its constitutional processes".

Mr Albanese declared it was an "historic" day for both nations, saying the mutual defence provisions were "similar" to those in the longstanding ANZUS treaty between Australia, New Zealand and the United States.

"This is Australia's first new alliance in more than 70 years," he told reporters in Canberra.

"I say on behalf of the government and people of Australia that we consider it a great honour that our nearest neighbour is our newest ally."

Mr Albanese also echoed the words of former prime minister Gough Whitlam at PNG's independence at 1975, saying the treaty was "an idea whose time had come".

Mr Marape said the agreement wasn't fuelled by "geopolitics" but "out of geography, history and the enduring reality of our shared neighbourhood".

"It is about one bigger fence that secures two houses that has its own yard space. It is in this construct that we're going about in signing this Treaty," Mr Marape said.

The Australian government sees this agreement as a major strategic victory, entrenching its position as PNG's key defence partner, and making it much harder for China to ratchet up defence cooperation with Port Moresby.

The document includes a commitment from both countries that they won't undertake "any activities with third parties" which "compromise the purposes of this treaty" — which observers say is clearly aimed at limiting China's defence engagement with Port Moresby.

China has already warned PNG that the document shouldn't compromise its independence, and says it shouldn't be used to block other countries from pursuing cooperation.

But Mr Marape said that he had been "transparent" with China about the treaty, and that he wanted to maintain close ties with Beijing, saying the document was not designed to exclude anyone and that he had "no intent of creating enemies elsewhere".

"Some things that we can never change is history and geography. This is a part of the world where our children will be living, so it is in this context that for Papua New Guinea, we made this strategic call," he told journalists.

"A conscious choice that Australia will be our security partner of choice … I will never live to regret this choice I made."

The document also commits Australia to helping PNG expand and modernise its defence forces, saying "through continuous cooperation" the countries will "assist one another to maintain and develop their individual and collective capacity to protect their sovereignty, and deter and resist external threats and armed attacks".

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122340

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23699118 (060905ZOCT25) Notable: Video: Papua New Guinea may sit out potential conflict between Australia and China despite Pukpuk defence treaty – Papua New Guinea Prime Minister James Marape says there is a “high possibility” his country would not join a conflict involving Australia and China, despite the new Pukpuk mutual defence treaty. He told the ABC’s 7.30 that while the treaty commits both nations to “act to meet the common danger,” each retains sovereign decision-making. “We don’t expect Australia to drop everything and run to us,” Marape said, adding PNG would urge “peace, not war.” He ruled out Australian bases in PNG and said the treaty does not apply to potential border conflicts with Indonesia.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122272

>>122292

>>122330

>>122331

>>122339

Neighbours Albanese and Marape build a fence – but not to keep China out

Shane Wright - October 6, 2025

Papua New Guinea has likened a formal defence treaty with Australia to a fence protecting two homes and not a shield against Chinese aggression, after prime ministers Anthony Albanese and James Marape signed the agreement on Monday.

The Pukpuk treaty, Australia’s first formal alliance since the ANZUS treaty was signed in 1951, commits the near neighbours to coming to each other’s aid and to contributing to regional stability across the South Pacific, which is being targeted by China as part of its efforts to broaden its diplomatic reach.

The treaty was supposed to be signed in Port Morseby last month when Albanese visited the capital for the 50th anniversary of independence, but the PNG cabinet could not form a quorum in time to ratify the pact until recent days.

Similar to the ANZUS treaty, the agreement with PNG means that an armed attack on either nation in the Pacific is considered an assault on the other country that would be “dangerous to each other’s peace and security and the security of the Pacific”.

The treaty, which was proposed by Marape, also allows citizens from Australia and PNG to train and serve with each other’s defence forces.

Speaking in Canberra, Marape said the treaty was not aimed at China but served as a formal recognition of the strong links between PNG and Australia.

“This treaty was not conceived out of geopolitics or any other reason, but out of geography, history and the enduring reality of our shared neighbourhood,” he said.

“It is about one bigger fence that secures two houses that has its own yard space.

“This is not a treaty that sets up enemies but consolidates friendships, and China, we’ve been transparent, we have told them that Australia has become our security partner of choice and they understand our alliances here.”

Albanese, who later this month heads to Washington for his first formal meeting with President Donald Trump, said Australian foreign policy was based on three pillars: the US alliance, regional engagement and the support of multilateralism.

He said the Pukpuk treaty was an example of those three pillars at work.

“This is a concrete example of Australia accepting the invitation and the idea from Papua New Guinea that we step up this relationship to an alliance,” he said. “I see this very much as lifting our relationship to the next level.”

The agreement prevents the nations putting in place agreements with other nations that may “compromise” the Pukpuk treaty.

As part of the treaty, Australia and PNG will increase the number of joint military exercises, share more intelligence gathering and recruit citizens into each other’s defence forces.

There are currently about 3990 personnel in PNG’s defence forces, mostly in the army.

Marape has suggested up to 10,000 people from PNG could serve with the Australian Defence Force under the terms of the treaty.

Albanese said that over time “it could be really substantial numbers”. He said PNG citizens would join with residents of the Five Eyes nations – Australia, New Zealand, Britain, Canada and the United States - in being able to join the ADF.

“People who are permanent resident in Australia will have the same rights as current members of Five Eyes to serve and participate in the Australian Defence Force,” he said.

As part of the treaty, defence co-operation between the two nations will substantially increase.

The Coalition’s acting home affairs spokesman, James Paterson, said he welcomed the treaty.

“When reports first broke about a delay in the finalisation of this agreement, I said that I hoped that the Albanese government was able to tidy this up and get this agreed, and I do welcome that they have now done so,” he said.

https://www.theage.com.au/politics/federal/neighbours-albanese-and-marape-build-a-fence-but-not-to-keep-china-out-20251006-p5n0az.html

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x9v0XFR67uM

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122341

File: 18c7d838e2dd1e4⋯.jpg (1.98 MB,3000x2000,3:2,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 779395511f563cd⋯.jpg (3.85 MB,3000x2000,3:2,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23703699 (071020ZOCT25) Notable: PM says October 7 ‘not a day for demonstrations’ ahead of anniversary rallies – Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has urged “decent human behaviour” on the second anniversary of the Hamas attacks, saying “it is not a day for demonstrations”. Victorian Premier Jacinta Allan called planned pro-Palestinian rallies “deeply disrespectful”, while NSW Premier Chris Minns warned police would show “no tolerance for hateful behaviour”. Organisers described the events as vigils mourning Gaza’s devastation, but Albanese said protests would “undermine support for the Palestinian cause”. Zionist leaders condemned them as glorifying terror, while activist Nasser Mashni said calling vigils inappropriate was “anti-Palestinian racism”. Both Albanese and Sussan Ley will address parliament Tuesday, backing President Trump’s peace plan.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122289

>>122294

>>122328

>>122329

PM says October 7 ‘not a day for demonstrations’ ahead of anniversary rallies

Chip Le Grand and Paul Sakkal - October 7, 2025

1/2

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has called for “decent human behaviour” to mark October 7 as Victorian Premier Jacinta Allan condemned “deeply disrespectful” plans by pro-Palestinian groups to protest on the anniversary of the Hamas massacre that incited the war in Gaza.

With Israel and Hamas inching towards acceptance of a US-brokered peace plan to end a catastrophic conflict that has razed the Gaza Strip and killed an estimated 67,000 people, Albanese warned that any protests on Tuesday would undermine support for the Palestinian cause in Australia.

“[Tuesday] is not a day for demonstrations,” Albanese said, as the premiers of Victoria and NSW condemned the protests organised in both states to mark the second anniversary of the atrocities in which Hamas militants murdered 1200 people and took another 250 captive.

Israel’s ensuing invasion of Gaza was labelled a genocide in a landmark United Nations inquiry a fortnight ago.

In Melbourne, the Free Palestine Coalition Group has urged people to gather on Tuesday near the National Gallery of Victoria, an institution previously targeted by anti-Israel protesters because of its association with the prominent Jewish Gandel family, and march through the city to state parliament.

Organisers of the Melbourne event, titled Honouring Palestine, describe October 7 as a “large-scale assault” by Hamas fighters. It instructed those attending not to bring signs, posters or flags.

In Sydney’s Bankstown, the Stand4Palestine organisation linked to Islamic fundamentalist group Hizb ut-Tahrir has organised a “Glory to Martyrs” demonstration to coincide with October 7.

A prominent Stand4Palestine supporter, Sheikh Ibrahim Dadoun, said a day after the Hamas atrocities that he was “elated” by the attacks and later accused Israeli intelligence group Mossad of manufacturing antisemitic attacks in Australia.

Both groups are on the fringe of a broad-based Palestinian protest movement supported by trade unions, the Greens and academic, student, media, human rights and Aboriginal activists that peaked in August when an estimated 90,000 people walked across the Sydney Harbour Bridge.

Allan said anyone who protested on October 7 did not want peace in the Middle East or social harmony in Australian cities. “I condemn that behaviour,” she said. “It shouldn’t be occurring, and those who are choosing to mark this day with protest clearly are not acting in the interests of peace or supporting our great multicultural state.

“Behaving this way on the anniversary of the biggest single loss of Jewish life since the Holocaust on October 7, 2023, is deeply disrespectful, it is deeply inappropriate.”

NSW Premier Chris Minns said police would have no tolerance for hateful or intimidatory behaviour. “There is no place for anyone celebrating terrorism,” he said. “What happened on October 7 was a brutal terrorist attack, and no one should glorify or excuse that kind of violence.”

Albanese said it would be a sombre day for Jewish Australians. The date will be commemorated privately by observant Jews, who have postponed public events until after the Sukkot holidays.

Zionist Federation president Jeremy Leibler said any protests held on October 7 were a glorification of murder and abduction.

“This protest is nothing but a disgraceful celebration of Hamas’ October 7 massacre of 1200 people in Israel,” he said of the planned Melbourne event. “It is not about peace or ending the war; it’s about glorifying the murder and hostage-taking of Jews.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122342

File: 98c2253f1866f94⋯.jpg (187.17 KB,1280x720,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: bbaa9c3c6601c91⋯.jpg (484.18 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23703714 (071036ZOCT25) Notable: Protesters seek genocide declaration in Opera House fight – The Palestine Action Group has asked the NSW Supreme Court to rule that Israel is committing genocide in Gaza, as part of its legal battle to hold a rally at the Sydney Opera House. The group said it may appeal to the High Court if the protest is blocked and called on Premier Chris Minns to light the Opera House sails in Palestinian colours. Police argue the site cannot safely hold large crowds. Justice Desmond Fagan warned of potential “disaster” if tens of thousands converge on the forecourt, while the NSW Jewish Board of Deputies sought to intervene, citing community distress.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122328

>>122329

>>122341

Protesters seek genocide declaration in Opera House fight

JAMES DOWLING - 7 October 2025

1/2

Pro-Palestinian activists are demanding the NSW Supreme Court make a ruling on whether Israel is committing genocide 14,000km away in Gaza, while holding out the possibility of ­protesting at the Opera House ­regardless of a court decision of its legality.

As anti-Israel marches took place across the country on the two-year anniversary of the October 7 terror attacks, the Palestine Action Group left the door open to taking its demand to march at the Opera House all the way to the High Court.

Speaking ahead of the second hearing in their case against the police commissioner, representatives of the Palestine Action Group seized on comments by ­Supreme Court judge Desmond Fagan last Friday that the wider populace was “highly inflamed about … what is taking place in Gaza”. The activists are calling on the Supreme Court to make a formal finding that genocide is taking place in Gaza.

The group called on NSW Premier Chris Minns to light the sails of the Opera House in the colours of the Palestinian flag, which would represent an inversion of his decision after October 7, 2023 to project the Israeli flag upon it in solidarity with victims of the Hamas terror attacks.

While the loss of the court case would mean activists would lose a suite of legal protections and ­potentially face criminal charges upon congregating, protesters cannot technically be totally banned from demonstrating. PAG organiser Damian Ridgwell said he did not want to “presuppose the decision of the Supreme Court” by confirming whether the protest would go ahead at the Opera House regardless of the verdict, but said a march of some form on October 12 was inevitable.

Barrister James Emmett SC, appearing for the police commissioner, and the PAG’s representatives on Tuesday pushed the matter to be referred straight to the Court of Appeal to streamline proceedings after foreshadowing part of the case would be fought on constitutional grounds that needed the input of state and territory attorneys-general.

The case was adjourned until Wednesday morning and moved to the Court of Appeal. The NSW Jewish Board of Deputies also sought to join the proceedings as an intervener to speak on the distress a demonstration would cause, while the police commissioner argued the Opera House Trust should be joined as a party to the proceedings.

PAG solicitor Nick Hanna said: “If the police application is conceded to, the ramifications for the right to protest in Australia will not be confined to the Opera House, but for a wide variety of protest activities. The consequences of this case will be worn by a wide variety of groups, whatever you want to protest about.”

The legal conflict facing the court stems from how the right to freedom of assembly sits alongside legal provisions protecting the Opera House. Mr Hanna would not be drawn on whether PAG would take its case to the High Court if unsuccessful.

Supreme Court judge Ian Harrison pointed to the time pressure on the proceedings and the interest in their timely management.

“You’d have to live in a vacuum not to be aware of the significant public importance of these proceedings to all members of the community,” Justice Harrison said. “Significant among matters that inform the way in which this matter is dealt with is the urgency of it and I’m not critical of the fact that proceedings effectively commenced on Friday and we have an end date of next Sunday, requiring a decision one way or the other.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122343

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23703739 (071057ZOCT25) Notable: ‘Sheer horror’: Pro-terrorism graffiti removed after uproar – (Video) Police are investigating pro-Hamas graffiti that appeared in Melbourne’s north on the second anniversary of the October 7 attacks, condemned by leaders as “abhorrent” and “deeply disgraceful”. Messages such as “Glory to Hamas” and “Oct 7, do it again” were found in Fitzroy and Preston before being removed. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said those responsible “must face the full force of the law”, while Deputy PM Richard Marles called the vandalism “a message of division”. Artist Nina Sanadze said seeing the graffiti filled her with “sheer horror”. Alex Ryvchin said the attacks revealed a “vicious streak” aimed at dividing Australians.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122328

>>122329

>>122341

>>122342

‘Sheer horror’: Pro-terrorism graffiti removed after uproar

Hannah Hammoud - October 7, 2025

1/2

The Australian Federal Police are investigating pro-terrorist graffiti in Melbourne’s north, which sparked widespread criticism from Australia’s political leaders on the anniversary of October 7, 2023 attacks on Israel.

A pro-Palestinian protest also proceeded as planned, with organisers saying calls from the prime minister and premier to not demonstrate on the day ignored Palestinians’ plight.

Police are investigating two acts of vandalism in the form of graffiti praising terrorist group Hamas in Fitzroy on Tuesday morning. The local council says the graffiti has been removed.

The phrase “Glory to Hamas” was scrawled on a billboard at the busy intersection of Alexandra Parade and Brunswick Street. About 500 metres away, the Fitzroy Officeworks on Alexandra Parade was also targeted, with graffiti reading “Oct 7, do it again” and “Glory to the martyrs” defacing the building. Officeworks said the graffiti had been painted over.

Further north, in Preston, a banner featuring the phrase “Glory to the martyrs” was spotted hanging over a pedestrian overpass on Bell Street alongside the Palestinian flag.

The incidents occurred on the second anniversary of the October 7, 2023, attacks in which Hamas murdered 1200 people in Israel and took 250 hostages. In response, Israel launched a two-year campaign that has killed an estimated 67,000 Palestinians so far. A UN commission of inquiry has labelled Israel’s actions in Gaza as genocidal.

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese condemned the graffiti plastered across the Fitzroy billboard.

“The terrorist propaganda defacing a Melbourne billboard on the anniversary of the October 7 murders is abhorrent,” he said.

“The people responsible must face the full force of the law. The AFP [Australian Federal Police] will work with Victorian police to bring them to justice.”

A pro-Palestine demonstration went ahead as planned in Melbourne on Tuesday evening, hours after the graffiti incidents. The Free Palestine Coalition Group had urged people to gather near the National Gallery of Victoria, which was previously targeted by anti-Israel protesters because of its association with the prominent Jewish Gandel family.

At 5pm, about 150 people gathered in the Queen Victoria Gardens, opposite the NGV, where 16 police officers were stationed. Although the gathering’s organisers asked attendees not to display signage, posters or flags, several Palestinian flags and a sign saying “We shall rebuild” were on display.

After the speeches, several protesters held white bags meant to symbolise dead bodies. The atmosphere remained peaceful as the group of began their walk to state parliament, with numbers growing to about 250 people.

Albanese said on Monday that the anniversary of the Hamas attacks was “not a day for demonstrations” and Victorian Premier Jacinta Allan said they were “deeply disrespectful”.

Speaking at the pro-Palestinian gathering, rally organiser Nour Salman described the prime minister’s criticism of the demonstrations as “absolutely atrocious”.

Salman rejected Albanese’s characterisation of the gatherings, and said that missing from political statements about the rallies was any acknowledgment of the Palestinian lives lost since the war began. “This is exactly why this vigil is taking place,” Salman said.

On Tuesday morning, a commemoration was held at the Goldstone Gallery in Collingwood, marking the anniversary of the October 7 attacks.

The event, which began at 6.29am – the same time sirens were heard at the Nova music festival in southern Israel – was organised by Jewish artists Nina Sanadze and Danny Ben-Moshe, and included an all-day vigil featuring speeches, victim name-readings, poetry and music.

Sanadze described her reaction to seeing the words defacing the Fitzroy billboard as “just sheer horror”.

“I nearly screamed just seeing it on a day like this,” she said.

“It was up there for a good five hours before it was taken down. I was thinking, how can I get up there and paint over it?

“It’s beyond horrific, upsetting and, unfortunately, while I’m surprised every time, it’s not so surprising any more.”

Sanadze said her exhibition aimed to forensically detail the events of October 7 through witness testimony.

Deputy Prime Minister Richard Marles, also the defence minister, labelled the graffiti attack disgraceful and deeply offensive.

“This day can only be one thing, and that is a day of commemoration and remembrance,” Marles told ABC Melbourne. “It’s a deeply solemn day, and to have that message scrawled in that way is obviously disgraceful, and we need to be a society which is cohesive, which looks out for each other, and that is obviously a message of division.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122344

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23703774 (071109ZOCT25) Notable: Video: Papua New Guinea may sit out potential conflict between Australia and China despite Pukpuk defence treaty – Papua New Guinea Prime Minister James Marape says there is a “high possibility” his country would not join a conflict involving Australia and China, despite the new Pukpuk mutual defence treaty. He told the ABC’s 7.30 that while the treaty commits both nations to “act to meet the common danger,” each retains sovereign decision-making. “We don’t expect Australia to drop everything and run to us,” Marape said, adding PNG would urge “peace, not war.” He ruled out Australian bases in PNG and said the treaty does not apply to potential border conflicts with Indonesia.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122272

>>122330

>>122331

>>122339

>>122340

Papua New Guinea may sit out potential conflict between Australia and China despite Pukpuk defence treaty

Patrick Bell - October 2025

Papua New Guinea Prime Minister James Marape says there is a "high possibility" the country would not enter a potential conflict involving Australia and China, despite having signed a mutual defence treaty with its southern neighbour.

The Pukpuk treaty is Australia's first new military alliance in more than 70 years, and includes a provision that an armed attack on either country would be considered "dangerous to each other's peace and security".

The two countries have committed to act "to meet the common danger, in accordance with [each other's] constitutional processes".

But Mr Marape has told 7.30 there was a high possibility PNG would sit out such a conflict involving China, and emphasised his country's sovereignty.

"This treaty was constructed within the fullest ambit of respecting sovereignties, and [each country] making their own calls," he told 7.30.

"In a conflict, we don't expect Australia to drop everything and run to us."

Mr Marape said the final decision on whether to enter conflict "rests with respective defence force commanders" in either country.

He also said that, that if there were any future conflict between the United States and China, he would encourage Australia to seek peace before joining in the armed conflict.

"Our relationship with Australia will mean that we sit at a decision-making table, and we will say, look, give peace a go, not war," he said.

He has downplayed the risk of such a conflict with China eventuating.

"I don't necessarily see China as an enemy," Mr Marape said.

"We trade with China, we do business with China, and so there is no need for an alarmist approach in this conversation."

Mr Marape also questioned what military contribution PNG would be able to make if any such conflict were to arise.

"What does PNG have to offer right now?" he said.

"At the moment, our military capacity is not at a space where we are an active participant."

Indonesia-PNG relations

The commitments around mutual defence have also raised questions about Australia's obligations if conflict broke out between PNG and Indonesia.

Mr Marape said the Pukpuk treaty did not compel Australia to assist PNG in the event of conflict on the Indonesian border.

He emphasised that his country had a "healthy dialogue with Indonesia", and said he was "100 per cent certain Indonesia will not be offended" at his country's decision to sign the treaty.

"They clearly understand where our need is," he said, adding that his government did not discuss the Pukpuk treaty with Indonesia prior to signing it.

"Not at all, it's a matter between PNG and Australia."

While the treaty commits both nations to the interoperability and integration of their defence forces, Mr Marape also said the prospect of the Australian defence force establishing its own bases in PNG was not likely "at this stage".

"It will be PNG troops in PNG, we're building our own PNG defence force," he said.

But he said Australia was among several nations whose defence forces had used facilities in PNG under a range of defence agreements.

"It's just the amplifying of that sort of arrangement," Mr Marape said.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-10-06/png-may-sit-out-australia-china-conflict-despite-defence-pct/105859432

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=npIDML0PqxU

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122345

File: 991c452d42cf827⋯.mp4 (14.37 MB,640x360,16:9,Clipboard.mp4)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23703822 (071126ZOCT25) Notable: Video: Anthony Albanese reveals he received 'lovely' letter from White House ahead of Donald Trump meeting – Prime Minister Anthony Albanese says he is “not at all” nervous about his upcoming October 20 meeting with US President Donald Trump, citing a “quite lovely letter” of invitation from the White House. Albanese said his discussions with Trump had been “really warm” and that he expected positive news on AUKUS after a Pentagon review. He also highlighted Australia’s new defence alliance with Papua New Guinea as proof of regional leadership and said the US enjoyed a trade surplus with Australia, calling it “an important economic relationship.”

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122300

>>122310

>>122311

>>122320

>>122321

Anthony Albanese reveals he received 'lovely' letter from White House ahead of Donald Trump meeting

Daniel Jeffrey - Oct 7, 2025

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese says he isn't feeling at all nervous about this month's visit to the White House to meet US President Donald Trump.

While some world leaders have been subjected to an Oval Office ambush this year – most infamously Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky – Albanese said he wasn't concerned about his October 20 meeting, pointing to a "quite lovely" letter he received from the Trump administration.

"Not at all," he said when asked if he was nervous about the meeting on Today this morning.

"I've had really warm discussions with President Trump and I received a quite lovely letter, I've got to say, of invitation to attend the White House."

While the US under Trump has pressured Australia to increase its level of defence spending, Albanese is expected to receive good defence news ahead of his visit, with a Pentagon review expected to lock in the future of the AUKUS deal, despite earlier concerns the pact might have been on the chopping block.

"Our defence and security relationship is so important through the AUKUS agreements," Albanese said.

"I've just been in the UK talking with Prime Minister (Sir Keir) Starmer and the Defence Minister (John) Healey and others there as well, about how important that is."

The prime minister will also be armed with a good-news story of his own making for his trip to Washington, following the signing of a defence agreement with Papua New Guinea that will limit China's ability to gain a military foothold in the largest Pacific Islands nation.

"It's a fantastic deal, as Prime Minister (James) Marape put it in this very corridor here just yesterday, the idea of one fence, two neighbours," Albanese said.

"And it really strengthens the national sovereignty of both of our countries.

"It is our first alliance in more than seven decades, so it's a very big deal.

"It says that should there be a common threat, we will combine our efforts to defend our respective nations and help each other out."

But ahead of the diplomatic visit, Albanese was also keen to push an economic message as well.

He pointed to the US's trade surplus with Australia – a clear and obvious reminder directed to the White House, where Trump has railed against nations with which Washington has a trade deficit.

"We have an important economic relationship as well," Albanese said.

"They're major investors here in Australia, America enjoys a trade surplus with Australia."

https://www.9news.com.au/national/anthony-albanese-latter-white-house-donald-trump-meeting/506dc901-6729-4e52-90c4-3e292b8adf51

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122346

File: 105d225264c0a65⋯.jpg (1.56 MB,1900x1425,4:3,Clipboard.jpg)

File: cbda3a239d8d560⋯.jpg (1.41 MB,1203x2515,1203:2515,Clipboard.jpg)

File: e6523f86e4ef2df⋯.jpg (389.96 KB,1275x1650,17:22,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23706825 (072251ZOCT25) Notable: US supreme court declines to hear Ghislaine Maxwell’s appeal of sex-trafficking conviction – The US Supreme Court has rejected Ghislaine Maxwell’s bid to overturn her sex-trafficking conviction, ending her legal avenues for appeal. Maxwell, sentenced in 2022 to 20 years for recruiting and exploiting girls for Jeffrey Epstein, can now only seek presidential clemency. Her lawyer, David Oscar Markus, said “serious legal and factual issues remain.” The ruling upholds an earlier appeals court decision finding Epstein’s Florida non-prosecution deal did not shield Maxwell. The decision comes amid renewed controversy surrounding President Donald Trump’s past ties to Epstein and allegations of White House interference in related disclosures. Victims’ advocates welcomed the ruling, saying Maxwell had caused “devastating harm.”

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109289 (pb)

>>109474 (pb)

>>109582 (pb)

>>122204

>>122245

US supreme court declines to hear Ghislaine Maxwell’s appeal of sex-trafficking conviction

Jeffrey Epstein associate was sentenced in 2022 to 20 years in prison for sex trafficking and related crimes

Edward Helmore - 7 Oct 2025

The US supreme court has declined to hear an appeal from the Jeffrey Epstein associate Ghislaine Maxwell of her sex-trafficking conviction.

The decision brings an end to Maxwell’s legal effort to have her 2021 conviction on sex-trafficking charges overturned – and leaves presidential clemency as her only option for early release from a 20-year prison sentence handed to her in 2022.

“We’re, of course, deeply disappointed that the Supreme Court declined to hear Ghislaine Maxwell’s case,” Maxwell’s lawyer, David Oscar Markus, said in a statement to CNN. “But this fight isn’t over. Serious legal and factual issues remain, and we will continue to pursue every avenue available to ensure that justice is done.”

She was also transferred to a lower-security federal facility in Texas.

Monday’s US supreme court ruling follows a decision by the New York-based second US circuit court of appeals last year that found Epstein’s non-prosecution agreement in Florida did not bind prosecutors in New York – and it let Maxwell’s conviction and sentence stand.

The decision by the supreme court to deny her appeal was issued without comment. It also offers a reprieve to Donald Trump, who has been under pressure from disclosures by a congressional oversight committee looking into the case and has struggled to contain a scandal over the president’s past friendship with Epstein.

In September, the committee released content from Epstein’s 50th birthday album, complete with a sexually suggestive entry attributed to Trump that the White House has claimed is fraudulent.

Trump later filed a defamation claim against the Wall Street Journal – which first reported on the greeting.

Karoline Leavitt, the White House press secretary, said the White House would welcome expert handwriting analysis and called the Epstein case generally “a hoax” meant to distract from the administration’s achievements during Trump’s second presidency.

But critics say the Trump administration has failed to fulfil a promise to release all of the federal government’s documentation on Epstein. He has also stoked controversy by saying he is “allowed” to give Maxwell a pardon or commute her sentence under his presidential powers – although he has also maintained “it’s something I have not thought about”.

The Epstein-Maxwell conspiracy continues to swirl through corridors of power and society.

In September, Peter Mandelson, British ambassador to the US, was abruptly recalled after leaked emails showed his friendship with Epstein continued long after the financier’s Florida guilty plea. Mandelson called Epstein his “best pal” in one exchange.

Starmer said Mandelson had been properly vetted before his appointment.

Sources close to Mandelson say that his dismissal, coming days before a lavish state visit to the UK by Trump and US first lady Melania Trump, had earned Starmer “a bitter enemy”.

Lauren Hersh, national director of World Without Exploitation, a group representing the rights of sex-trafficking victims, said on Monday’s decision: “We are obviously happy to see the denial of Ghislaine Maxwell’s appeal.”

Hersh’s statement said jurors “spoke loud and clear about how, for decades, Maxwell caused such devastating harm to so many women and girls”.

“We’re heartened that she was rightfully not given leniency for her heinous crimes.”

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/oct/06/ghislaine-maxwell-supreme-court-appeal

https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=/docket/docketfiles/html/public/24-1073.html

https://www.realghislaine.com/media

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122347

File: 3b8e5ccb1766bb0⋯.mp4 (15.04 MB,640x360,16:9,Clipboard.mp4)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23706838 (072255ZOCT25) Notable: Video: Donald Trump says he would consider a pardon for Ghislaine Maxwell – US President Donald Trump said he would “take a look” at pardoning convicted sex trafficker and former associate Ghislaine Maxwell after her Supreme Court appeal was rejected. Speaking in the Oval Office, Trump appeared unaware of the ruling, saying, “I’ll take a look at it… I will speak to the DOJ.” Maxwell is serving a 20-year sentence for trafficking a teenage girl. Trump also claimed Sean “Diddy” Combs had asked him for a pardon. Meanwhile, House Republicans have delayed swearing in Democrat Adelita Grijalva, blocking a vote to force the release of Epstein-related files. Democrats called the move part of an “Epstein cover-up.”

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122346

Donald Trump says he would consider a pardon for Ghislaine Maxwell

Nick Pearson - Oct 7, 2025

US President Donald Trump said he would "take a look" at a pardon for convicted sex trafficker and his long-time friend Ghislaine Maxwell.

The president was asked today whether he would consider a pardon after Maxwell's appeal to the Supreme Court was rejected today.

The rejection means Maxwell's only hope for freedom would be a pardon from the president.

Trump appeared to be unaware that Maxwell's appeal bid was knocked back when in the Oval Office.

"You know, I haven't heard the name in so long. I can say this, that I'd have to take a look at it. I would have to take a look," he said.

"I'll take a look at it. I will speak to the DOJ (Department of Justice).

"I wouldn't consider it or not consider, I don't know anything about it."

He then brought up Sean "Diddy" Combs, another acquaintance convicted of sex crimes.

"I have a lot of people have asked me for pardons. I call him Puff Daddy, (he) has asked me for a pardon," Trump said.

Maxwell is serving a 20-year prison term after being found guilty of sex trafficking a teenage girl.

Earlier this year, she was moved from a low-security federal prison in Florida to a minimum-security prison camp in Texas after she was interviewed in July by Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche.

Maxwell and Trump were long-time friends, along with her partner Jeffrey Epstein.

Presidents have the legal authority to pardon or grant clemency to anyone in a federal prison.

Meanwhile, Republicans in the House of Representatives have refused to swear in a newly elected Democratic congresswoman.

Typically, new representatives are sworn in the day after winning their election.

But a fortnight after winning a special election in Arizona's 7th congressional district in a landslide, Adelita Grijalva has not been sworn in.

Democrats in the House are tying the delay to a crucial vote on the release of the Epstein files.

If 218 signatures from representatives are filed on a discharge petition, the House will have to vote on requiring the Trump administration to release all files related to Epstein.

There are currently 217 signatures on the petition, and Grijalva would be the 218th.

Since Grijalva's election, the Republican Speaker Mike Johnson has cancelled all votes in the House.

"This is all about a continuation of the Epstein cover-up," top Democrat Jim McGovern said.

"They're not bringing us back primarily because they're afraid of the discharge petition, you know, and getting the clock started to move a vote on the Epstein files."

Grijalva said the delay was "suspicious".

"You know, I really am not a conspiracy theorist–type of person in general," she told MSNBC.

"I try to come up with, like, 'What is the most plausible reason why this would be happening?'

"And respectfully, I can come up with nothing else."

Johnson said he will swear in Grijalva when Congress returns to a regular session.

After making that promise, he declared this week a "district work period", sending members of Congress home.

https://www.9news.com.au/world/ghislaine-maxwell-pardon-donald-trump-jeffrey-epstein-files-adelita-grijalva/faa265c4-a41d-4eaa-96e0-c06830ff201e

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122348

File: 1960aef0a40f9c7⋯.jpg (168.86 KB,1280x720,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 36ff77500918942⋯.jpg (101.16 KB,1080x1440,3:4,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 479c0aa3ca2bfe6⋯.jpg (567.28 KB,2048x2731,2048:2731,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23706846 (072256ZOCT25) Notable: Linda Reynolds launches bankruptcy bid against David Sharaz – Former senator Linda Reynolds has initiated bankruptcy proceedings against David Sharaz in the Federal Court, seeking to recover hundreds of thousands in damages and legal costs from her successful defamation case. Reynolds confirmed she was forced to apply for substituted service after Sharaz “refused to accept” a bankruptcy notice. The WA Supreme Court last month ordered Sharaz to pay $92,000 in damages plus up to $500,000 in costs. Reynolds said Sharaz and Brittany Higgins had adopted a “strategy of driving up my legal costs.” A bankruptcy ruling could allow her to claim part of Sharaz’s future earnings. Higgins is appealing her own $340,000 defamation loss.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122229

>>122230

>>122232

>>122270

>>122273

Linda Reynolds launches bankruptcy bid against David Sharaz

PAUL GARVEY - October 06, 2025

Former senator Linda Reynolds has launched bankruptcy proceedings against David Sharaz in the Federal Court, as she pursues the husband of Brittany Higgins for hundreds of thousands of dollars of defamation damages and legal costs.

Federal Court records show Ms Reynolds filed an affidavit and an application for the substituted service of a bankruptcy notice in Western Australia on Monday afternoon. The matter is scheduled for a hearing this month.

Mr Sharaz was Ms Higgins’ partner at the time she went public with allegations that she had been raped by colleague Bruce Lehrmann inside Ms Reynolds’ Parliament House office.

Ms Reynolds sued both Ms Higgins and Mr Sharaz for defamation over a subsequent series of social media posts by the pair. Mr Sharaz opted not to defend the action, saying at the time he could not afford to pay legal costs.

Ms Reynolds confirmed she had launched the bankruptcy action after being unable to personally serve the bankruptcy notice on Mr Sharaz.

“The Bankruptcy Act requires Bankruptcy Notices to be personally served on their recipients,” Ms Reynolds said in a statement.

“Predictably Mr Sharaz has refused to accept personal service of the Bankruptcy Notice I had issued to him last week. This has required me to apply to the court for dispensation from the requirements of personal service at a further significant cost to me. Mr Sharaz, Ms Higgins and their associates have long adopted a strategy of driving up my legal costs so this conduct comes as no surprise to me. Despite these tactics I remain resolute in seeing this through to the end.”

The WA Supreme Court last month handed down its decision in Ms Reynolds’ defamation action against Mr Sharaz, ordering him to pay the former senator $92,000 in damages plus legal costs estimated at as much as $500,000.

A bankruptcy declaration could open a path for Ms Reynolds to secure a portion of Mr Sharaz’s future earnings.

Mr Sharaz works alongside Ms Higgins as a director of Sydney public relations firm Third Hemisphere. The couple announced the birth of their first child in March.

The defamation ruling against Mr Sharaz came weeks after the WA Supreme Court also found in favour of Ms Reynolds in her claim against Ms Higgins.

Justice Paul Tottle ordered Ms Higgins to pay her former boss more than $340,000 in damages and interest plus costs.

He also found Ms Higgins had made “objectively untrue and misleading statements” when she first went public with her allegations that Ms Reynolds had engaged in a cover-up of her alleged rape.

Justice Tottle also ordered Ms Higgins to pay 80 per cent of Ms Reynolds’ legal costs, a figure likely to reach more than $1.5m.

Ms Higgins has lodged an ­appeal against the defamation ­decision.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/linda-reynolds-launches-bankruptcy-bid-against-david-sharaz/news-story/3c88aeb36031cb897aa787162df56439

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122349

File: 1988b8188d634fb⋯.mp4 (11.65 MB,960x540,16:9,Clipboard.mp4)

File: 4b6c834f29b3506⋯.jpg (241.04 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: dc3c9a01c6edfc5⋯.jpg (284.48 KB,1858x1045,1858:1045,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23708525 (080729ZOCT25) Notable: ‘Hamas vandals’ caught on security cameras – (Video) Masked offenders in high-visibility vests were filmed spray-painting “Glory to Hamas” on a Fitzroy billboard and defacing nearby shops in Northcote and Alexandra Parade in coordinated anti-Semitic graffiti attacks. Victoria Police and the Australian Federal Police are investigating, describing the incidents as “hate-based commentary” supporting a listed terrorist organisation. CCTV footage shows the offenders using rollers around 2am Tuesday. Detective Acting Sergeant Travis Jones said the vandalism was “devastating for the Jewish community” and vowed to find those responsible. Operation Park has made 257 arrests and logged 442 antisemitism reports since October 2023, with 10,500 police patrols at Jewish community sites.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122328

>>122329

>>122341

>>122342

>>122343

‘Hamas vandals’ caught on security cameras

DAMON JOHNSTON - 8 October 2025

A gang of anti-Semitic graffiti vandals wearing masks and high-viz vests have been caught by security cameras painting “Glory to Hamas” on a billboard and plastering offensive slogans on a nearby business.

The security footage shows two individuals with large rollers painting “Glory to Hamas” on the billboard at the intersection of Brunswick Street and Alexandra Parade in Fitzroy about 2am. The graffitied billboard was not removed until about ten hours later, around midday.

Detectives from the Yarra Crime Investigation Unit have also released CCTV footage of three offenders attacking a shop on High Street, Northcote, about 1.10am. Police believe the same offenders are responsible for the Fitzroy and Northcote attacks.

Police are also investigating a third anti-Semitic graffiti attack on the wall of a shop on Alexandra Parade in Fitzroy around 2am on Tuesday.

The Australian Federal Police has joined Victoria Police in the investigation into the three attacks which have been condemned by Australian political leaders and Jewish community leaders.

Victoria Police said the graffiti was related to “hate-based commentary associated with the current conflict in the Middle East, as well as showing support for a listed terrorist organisation in Australia”.

Detective Acting Sergeant Travis Jones said the “Glory to Hamas” graffiti attack had been

“devastating for the Jewish community and Victoria Police is fully committed to finding those responsible”.

“This behaviour has zero place in society, with Victoria Police and the AFP working hand-in-hand to locate and charge the culprits,” Det-Sgt Jones said.

“Victoria Police has conducted a series of proactive patrols in recent weeks around Jewish community locations to ensure the community feels safe and supported during the Jewish High Holy Period. This support will continue, with police to remain present at key locations on a weekly basis, in line with the Sabbath period.”

Victoria Police investigates and monitors offences, including graffiti attacks, associated with the Middle East conflict as part of Operation Park. Since the broad operation was launched, police have made 257 arrests and there have been 442 reports relating to antisemitism.

Police said penalties have included unpaid community work, fines, and jail.

Since October 2023, Victoria Police has conducted more than 10,500 patrols within Jewish community locations across the state.

Anyone who witnessed the incident or has information is urged to contact Crime Stoppers on 1800 333 000 or submit a confidential report online at:

https://www.crimestoppersvic.com.au/

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/hamas-vandals-caught-on-security-cameras/news-story/abee979142762268c3ea43178fd3ca83

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122350

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23708560 (080751ZOCT25) Notable: Video: Opera House protest risks Hillsborough-like disaster, court hears – The NSW Court of Appeal will rule Thursday on whether a pro-Palestine rally can proceed at the Sydney Opera House, after police warned of “disaster” and a potential “Hillsborough-type tragedy.” Chief Justice Andrew Bell said the site’s “cul-de-sac” layout could cause a deadly crowd crush, while Assistant Commissioner Peter McKenna cited fears of weapons, flares and “prohibited symbols.” Protest organisers argued the case had major implications for freedom of assembly and demanded the court recognise Israel’s actions in Gaza as genocide. The NSW Jewish Board of Deputies joined the proceedings as an intervener to present its interests — warning of rising antisemitism and heightened community fear. Police said safety risks outweighed protesters’ symbolic use of the iconic venue.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122328

>>122329

>>122341

>>122342

Opera House protest risks Hillsborough-like disaster, court hears

JAMES DOWLING - 8 October 2025

1/3

Pro-Palestine activists will know by Thursday morning if they can stage a rally on the steps of the Sydney Opera House, after a court heard there was risk of crowd crush or a catastrophic “concertina effect” — and the state’s highest legal officer invoking the memory of the Hillsborough disaster.

Protesters appearing before the highest court in NSW have argued their case has wide-ranging ramifications for freedom of assembly, despite concerns from NSW Police that the protest has “disaster written all over it”, citing potential crowd behaviour and attendants sneaking in weapons, flares or “prohibited symbols”.

NSW Chief Justice Andrew Bell suggested the potential for a “Hillsborough-type tragedy”, when 97 people were killed in Sheffield, England due to crowd crush at Hillsborough Stadium. The Court of Appeal reserved its judgment until 9:30am on Thursday.

The Palestine Action Group is seeking authorisation for its planned Opera House protest scheduled for Sunday before a full bench in the NSW Court of Appeal – demanding the court rule Israel is committing genocide in Gaza as part of any court order protecting the protest.

Sunday’s planned protest comes after Tuesday’s “Glory to our Martyrs” demonstration in Bankstown, which drew bipartisan condemnation as it fell on the second anniversary of the October 7 attack on Israel.

While the loss of the court case would mean activists would lose a suite of legal protections and ­potentially face criminal charges upon congregating, protesters cannot technically be totally banned from demonstrating. PAG organiser Damian Ridgwell on Tuesday said he did not want to “presuppose the decision of the Supreme Court” by confirming whether the protest would go ahead at the Opera House regardless of the verdict, but said a march of some form on October 12 was inevitable.

Justice Bell on Wednesday warned court prohibition orders on protests were not a “paper tiger” and activists who knowingly defied them may be committing a contempt of court.

Crowd safety

In cross-examination on Wednesday, PAG barrister Felicity Graham and NSW Police Assistant Commissioner Peter McKenna examined potential crowd management issues at the planned protest, using the Harbour Bridge March for Humanity and past pro-Palestine rallies as a precedent.

Mr McKenna argued the layout of the Opera House forecourt – and it’s “cul-de-sac” design – presented safety challenges as it would force the crowd to turn back on itself.

“You don’t want a situation where the front is catching the tail, because experts will tell us it’s crowd management 101 – we don’t turn crowds back upon themselves.” Mr McKenna said.

“All the altruism in the world doesn’t assist when you have a physical scenario when you believe the numbers are far too excessive to keep people safe.”

Ms Graham pointed to three exits from the Opera House forecourt to ease crowd pressure, with one leading back to the Circular Quay boardwalk and two into the Royal Botanic Gardens, but Mr McKenna said it would be insufficient.

“I don’t believe there are sufficient egress (points). I think they are quite precarious and dangerous,” he said. “The PAG have said the whole point of this is it needs to be at this iconic location of the Opera House. I don’t think people are going to come walk through and then just walk out again. It’s farcical.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122351

File: 5dce53d3c31cbd2⋯.jpg (1.33 MB,5412x3608,3:2,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23708582 (080803ZOCT25) Notable: Gaza tensions, Nazis and nefarious foreign actors spark police overhaul – New Australian Federal Police Commissioner Krissy Barrett has warned extremists and foreign states that they are now “on our radar” as she launches a sweeping overhaul to defend democracy from hate-fuelled unrest. Barrett said the Hamas attacks and Israel’s response — labelled genocide by the UN — had driven a surge in ideological crimes and antisemitic threats. Her new national security squads will target Nazi groups, radicals and foreign influence operations linked to Iran. The AFP will also coordinate state prosecutions under new hate-crime laws and expand protection of landmarks and politicians. Barrett said “states are using criminal proxies to destabilise adversaries,” while China remained the main cyber threat.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109480 (pb)

>>122148

>>122343

>>122350

Gaza tensions, Nazis and nefarious foreign actors spark police overhaul

Paul Sakkal - October 7, 2025

1/2

Australia’s new federal police chief has issued a warning to extremists stoking fears and violence at protests that they are prime targets as she overhauls the national police force to defend democracy from the chaos generated by both radical actors and rogue states such as Iran.

As debate erupted on the October 7 anniversary during her first week as the AFP’s top officer, Krissy Barrett said the Hamas attacks – and Israel’s response, labelled a genocide by the United Nations – triggered a steep rise in cases driven by ideological hatred.

“We are putting these groups on notice,” Barrett said in an interview at the force’s Canberra headquarters. “The way some of these groups are physically presenting at protests is causing fear.”

“You’re on our radar … and we will be using all of our capabilities, partnerships and technological capabilities to protect the social cohesion of this country.”

Barrett, who on Monday replaced Reece Kershaw as Australia’s top cop, said her agency was shifting gears from simple enforcement of federal laws to tackling threats fuelled by everything from far-right conspiracy theories to the online radicalisation of children as young as 13, and foreign states using encrypted apps and criminals to weaponise antisemitism and social unrest.

Her first order of business is to launch national security investigation squads to work with Five Eyes partners and state police to monitor Nazi groups and other radicals, including those activated by the war in Gaza. These groups are not yet engaging in terrorist acts but are potentially breaching new hate crime laws that hand the AFP a new set of nefarious actors to target.

Barrett said the AFP was spending far more time protecting Canberra’s national landmarks from defacement and dealing with more threats to politicians. A Queensland man was charged this week with threatening to kill Albanese on social media.

“These threats are real,” the prime minister said on Monday. “We have seen in other countries, in the United States, in the United Kingdom, we have seen public figures, whether they be politicians or other public figures, targeted.”

Barrett said local activists were increasingly destroying property and targeting businesses based on their owners’ religion.

“More and more since October 7, we are seeing what’s happening to social cohesion in Australia and the emerging prevalence of what we describe as hate crimes,” she said.

“It’s fear, it’s hatred, it’s humiliation.”

“Conflict, not just the Middle East, Ukraine, Russia, geopolitical instability, it’s all reverberating here in Australia, and we’re seeing some of that play out on our streets.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122352

File: 2a2044464bec944⋯.mp4 (15.07 MB,640x360,16:9,Clipboard.mp4)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23708599 (080812ZOCT25) Notable: Video: US Senate committee questions Trump's Pentagon nominee John Noh over AUKUS review – Donald Trump’s nominee for assistant secretary of defence for Indo-Pacific Security Affairs, John Noh, told senators the AUKUS submarine pact may need “commonsense” adjustments to make it more “sustainable.” Noh avoided specifics, citing an ongoing Pentagon review led by Under Secretary Elbridge Colby and Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth, but said both nations could “strengthen pillar one” of AUKUS. Senators from both parties criticised delays and questioned the message to Australia amid tariffs and pressure to raise defence spending. Noh confirmed the review would conclude by December and must consider shipbuilding limits, with the US needing to raise production from 1.2 to 2.33 submarines per year to meet commitments.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109461 (pb)

>>122177

>>122236

>>122237

>>122320

US Senate committee questions Trump's Pentagon nominee John Noh over AUKUS review

Brad Ryan - 8 October 2025

The AUKUS submarine pact may need "commonsense" action from both Australia and the US to make it more "sustainable", Donald Trump's nominee to oversee US defence strategy in the Indo-Pacific has said.

But John Noh gave few specifics when questioned by the US Senate's Armed Services Committee, saying he did not want to pre-empt the Pentagon's ongoing review of the Australia-UK-US pact.

Mr Noh was asked for his assessment of AUKUS, including its first "pillar" to provide Australia with nuclear-powered submarines, at his confirmation hearing for the role of assistant secretary of defence for Indo-Pacific Security Affairs.

He said there were "commonsense things that we can do to strengthen AUKUS".

"I don't want to get ahead of both Under Secretary [Elbridge] Colby and Secretary [Pete] Hegseth because the review is ongoing," Mr Noh said.

"As the findings of the review come out, I believe Under Secretary Colby and Secretary Hegseth will have an opportunity to discuss specific recommendations.

"My personal view is that there are things that we, as in both the United States and Australia with the United Kingdom, can do to strengthen pillar one and make it more sustainable."

The review, which was revealed in June but which Mr Noh said did not begin until July, is examining whether the pact meets the president's "America First" agenda.

Both Democratic and Republican members of the committee — which strongly backs AUKUS — expressed frustration with the review and the US's recent treatment of Australia and other Indo-Pacific allies, which have been hit with tariffs and pressured to lift defence spending.

Committee chairman Roger Wicker, a Republican, said the review came as a "distressing surprise to our steadfast ally Australia".

"I'm disappointed with some of the decisions the department has made with respect to our allies in Japan, South Korea, Australia and Taiwan," Senator Wicker said.

"A few of these choices have left me scratching my head."

Democratic senator Jeanne Shaheen said: "What kind of message does it send to our ally Australia that after they have committed significant contributions to AUKUS that we are still fooling around … with a review that should have been done months ago?"

Recent reports in the US and Asia have suggested the pact is safe, and the Australian government has expressed confidence the submarine deal will continue.

But there are persistent concerns about America's capability to produce enough Virginia-class submarines to supply its own fleet — a necessary prerequisite to its pledge to provide between three and five to Australia.

Mr Noh pointed to America's need to increase its current production rate from 1.2 submarines a year to 2.33 a year to meet its shipbuilding targets and deliver on AUKUS.

"These are the issues … that we are looking into as part of the AUKUS review, as well as whether it's properly funded," he said.

He said the review, which he described as a "brass tacks, commonsense look at the realities facing AUKUS", would conclude "by this fall". The fall, or autumn, in the US started on September 22 and ends on December 21.

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese is scheduled to meet Mr Trump for talks in Washington on October 20, their first proper meeting since their respective election wins.

Under the current terms of the AUKUS pact, the first American submarine would arrive in Australia no earlier than 2032.

Eventually, the US would supply Australia with between three and five Virginia-class submarines, before Australia began building its own AUKUS-class submarines.

Australia has committed to pay $US2 billion ($3 billion) to the US by the end of the year to boost the American shipbuilding industry. More than half has already been paid.

The deal is projected to cost Australia up to $368 billion in total.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-10-08/trump-pentagon-nominee-john-noh-questioned-on-aukus/105864552

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122353

File: ff56c8da1931731⋯.mp4 (15.54 MB,640x360,16:9,Clipboard.mp4)

File: fbaa05b61b936c6⋯.jpg (59.29 KB,1266x697,1266:697,Clipboard.jpg)

File: cc054496140278d⋯.jpg (207.43 KB,1827x1215,203:135,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23708623 (080827ZOCT25) Notable: Video: High Court backs use of encrypted app to monitor crime figures after challenge by bikies – The High Court has upheld laws allowing police to use evidence from the AN0M encrypted app, a key tool in Operation Ironside that exposed major criminal networks. Two South Australian Comanchero gang members challenged the laws, arguing they breached the constitution, but the court ruled unanimously that the provisions “do no more than reflect the law.” The decision clears the way for hundreds of prosecutions based on AN0M material, including 115 in South Australia. The app, secretly developed by the Australian Federal Police and FBI, captured 28 million criminal messages between 2018 and 2021, with police monitoring them in real time.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

High Court backs use of encrypted app to monitor crime figures after challenge by bikies

Elizabeth Byrne - 8 October 2025

The High Court has backed new laws supporting the use of the AN0M app, used by police to monitor crime figures.

The ruling is set to clear the way for other prosecutions where material gathered by the app is critical to the case.

The laws were challenged by two South Australian men who were charged with being members of the Comanchero bikie gang.

The men have now pleaded guilty to participating in a criminal organisation, with one entering his plea shortly after today's High Court ruling, and the other admitting to the charge yesterday.

The charge carries a maximum penalty of 15 years, while other charges against the men have been dropped.

The pair initially took aim at prosecutors, by trying to have information thrown out that had been gathered against them via the app.

Without that information, there would likely have been no case.

Their appeals to local courts fell flat, but before the High Court could hear the case, the government changed laws to back in legal support for the use of AN0M.

By the time the High Court heard the case, it had morphed into two cases: one challenging the gathering of the material from AN0M and a special case challenging the new laws.

The men argued the new regime breached the constitution through an impermissible exercise of power by the Commonwealth, which also impaired the institutional integrity of the courts.

But, in a unanimous decision, the High Court ruled that was not the case.

"Those provisions do no more than reflect the law," the judgment said.

On the original case lodged with the court — about the gathering of the material using AN0M — the full bench found it was a moot point and decided not to hear the case.

App unwittingly recommended

AN0M was developed by the Australian Federal Police, and used in Operation Ironside, which also involved the FBI and others.

The app began to circulate among criminal elements, encouraged by people the police identified as "criminal influencers", who unwittingly recommended the devices.

To many, it looked like the perfect solution for sending encrypted messages.

Instead, police were monitoring communications for more than three years between 2018 and 2021, when the first arrests occurred.

It was a complicated system, where messages were copied as they were sent, and collected by a separate server.

That server sent it to another server, dubbed iBot, and that re-transmitted the copied message to a server in Sydney, which gave police access.

The app had collected about 28 million messages, including 19 million relating to Australia.

It had been a nervous wait for law enforcement bodies, with hundreds of prosecutions at stake.

Today's ruling has clarified that the material from AN0M can be used.

SA prosecutions to proceed

South Australia's Attorney-General Kyam Maher said the prosecution could now go ahead for about 115 South Australians accused of a range of crimes, including drug-related and firearm-related offences.

"We'll see over the next 18 months these people prosecuted," he said.

"What this does, this sends a pretty clear message that if you're involved in these sorts of activities, there is a good chance you're going to get caught, a good chance you're going to get prosecuted, and held to account.

"Authorities are doing everything that is possible to keep South Australians safe."

The two men at the centre of the High Court challenge will be back in court in December to be sentenced.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-10-08/high-court-endorses-afp-anom-app-in-bikie-legal-challenge/105865330

https://qresear.ch/?q=an0m

https://qresear.ch/?q=anom

https://qresear.ch/?q=operation+ironside

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122354

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23713223 (090829ZOCT25) Notable: President's Peace Plan:A moment of hope breaks the despair of the Gaza war – thanks to Donald Trump- (Video) US President Donald Trump has announced that Israel will halt its military campaign in Gaza after Hamas agreed to release all remaining hostages, in what could mark the first major step toward ending the two-year conflict. The ceasefire plan, brokered personally by Trump, would see Israel withdraw to an agreed line in exchange for the release of 20 living and 28 deceased hostages, along with more than 1900 Palestinian prisoners. Veteran diplomat Aaron David Miller said no US president had previously exerted such influence over Israel. Arab states including Qatar, Egypt and Jordan have reportedly supported the deal, which Trump said Netanyahu had “no choice” but to accept. Analysts warned, however, that key issues such as Hamas’s disarmament and Gaza’s future governance remain unresolved, leaving the peace process fragile.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122289

>>122294

>>122298

>>122322

A moment of hope breaks the despair of the Gaza war - thanks to Donald Trump

Matthew Knott - October 9, 2025

1/2

It may not yet win him the Nobel Peace Prize he craves, but Donald Trump deserves praise for finally, belatedly forcing Israel to halt the killing in Gaza and for Hamas agreeing to hand over the remaining hostages.

Two years of devastating war have offered few bright moments, but this is one. A moment that brought Gazans and Israelis onto the streets in the early hours to cheer. That dares one to dream, despite past failures, that Israeli bombs could stop raining down on Gaza, and the anguish of the hostage families is about to end.

If it took Richard Nixon to go to China, perhaps historians will argue that it took Trump – with all his flaws, quirks and questionable motives – to force a Gaza peace agreement. Trump is personally invested in brokering an end to the war and has grown impatient with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s delaying tactics.

Aaron David Miller, a veteran of the Middle East peace process, said on Thursday that he had never seen a US president exert such influence over an Israeli counterpart on a matter of core interest for Israel. That’s no small thing.

Distrustful of Netanyahu and convinced he had not prioritised the return of their loved ones, the Israeli hostage families have for months focused on Trump as the key to unlocking a breakthrough deal. They were right.

At the same time, Trump has convinced Hamas that, unless it agrees to return all the remaining hostages, the US will back Israel in unleashing an even more ferocious assault on the group, including by taking control of Gaza City.

According to Trump, the deal will see all the remaining hostages, living and dead, released in exchange for the Israeli military withdrawing to an agreed-upon line. Twenty hostages are thought to be alive, with 28 deceased.

The crucial specifics of how the hostage exchange will work, and the Israeli withdrawal line, are unclear.

It is the same with details of the agreed release of the 250 Palestinian prisoners serving life sentences and 1700 Gazans jailed by Israel during the war. It has yet to be revealed whether Hamas or Israel get to decide the names of the released prisoners.

Most closely watched will be whether Israel agrees to Hamas’ demand to release Marwan Barghouti, a Palestinian leader who has been imprisoned since 2002 over his involvement in the Second Intifada.

Nicknamed the “Palestinian Nelson Mandela”, Barghouti has long been seen as a potentially unifying leader and plausible successor to the ageing and widely despised Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas. Polling shows he is easily the most popular political figure among the Palestinian public, and his release could be a game-changer for the long-term peace process.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122355

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23713270 (090859ZOCT25) Notable: Video: Court prohibits pro-Palestine protest at Sydney Opera House – The NSW Court of Appeal has banned a planned pro-Palestine march from ending at the Sydney Opera House, ruling the event posed “unacceptable” public safety risks. Justice Stephen Free said the proposed 40,000-strong protest could have “given rise to a risk of crowd crush,” echoing concerns raised by Chief Justice Andrew Bell about the forecourt’s limited capacity. The decision allows police to move on or arrest demonstrators who gather at the site. Organisers from the Palestine Action Group said they would instead march down George Street and accused authorities of suppressing democratic rights. Premier Chris Minns welcomed the ruling, saying it was “the right decision.” The court cited poor safety planning, limited exits, and parallels to the 1989 Hillsborough disaster in finding the location unsafe for mass assembly.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122328

>>122329

>>122342

>>122350

>>122354

Court prohibits pro-Palestine protest at Sydney Opera House

Farid Farid - Oct 9, 2025

A planned pro-Palestine march set to end at the Sydney Opera House has been scuppered after a court ruled the risk to public safety was too great.

The decision today, which allows officers to move on or arrest those in the iconic landmark's forecourt, comes after NSW Police challenged the Palestine Action Group's proposed protest in the NSW Court of Appeal.

The organisers are now pivoting to a new location after estimating about 40,000 people would have joined the march through Sydney's city centre to the steps of the famed waterside landmark.

Justice Stephen Free said a protest of that size would have "given rise to a risk of crowd crush", which was the unanimous view of the court, he said.

The appeal court judges pointed to the "exceptional risks associated with the particular route and ultimate destination of the procession" combined with the crowd size and its movements.

That informed the "court's conclusions as to the unacceptable nature of those risks".

The absence of consultation on how organisers would address risk factors, including emergency vehicle access, reinforced the court's concerns.

"It is not a question of hoping for the best or hoping that things don't go wrong," they said.

Chief Justice Andrew Bell raised concerns over crowd safety during yesterday's hearing, pointing to the 1989 Hillsborough crowd crush disaster and evidence the Opera House forecourt could only safely accommodate 6000 people.

"The court proceedings did not go our way today and we won't be marching to the Opera House," Palestine Action Group organiser Damian Ridgwell told reporters after the decision.

"But we know courts often get things wrong."

He said Sunday's demonstration would instead head down George Street in Sydney's city centre in cooperation with police, urging leaders to light the Opera House sails in the colours of the Palestinian flag.

"Our right to protest is paramount in a democratic society," Ridgwell said.

Nick Hanna, a lawyer for the organisers, characterised the legal showdown as a "David vs Goliath battle" after the Opera House Trust, Botanic Gardens and Jewish groups all gave evidence supporting the police court challenge.

He warned anyone thumbing their nose at the decision and rallying at the Opera House forecourt on Sunday could be considered in contempt of court.

NSW has a permit system that allows protest participants to block public roads and infrastructure unless a court denies permission after a police challenge.

Premier Chris Minns welcomed the court for making the "right decision".

"It's very important and very clear from this judgment that the protest should not take place down at the Sydney Opera House," he told reporters.

Organisers had pointed to previous non-ticketed events at the Opera House, like popular light show Vivid, that were managed capably.

In the 1990s, Australian-New Zealand band Crowded House performed on the steps of the Opera House to a crowd of 100,000 people, Palestine Action Group noted in a post on social media.

But the court said entry points to the forecourt and requirements for security checks would have pushed protesters into a tight space that could lead to crowd crush.

Palestine Action Group has been organising weekly rallies for two years since Israel's military assault on Gaza began in 2023.

The Israeli response came after 1200 people were killed and about 250 were taken hostage during a surprise attack by Hamas, which Australia deems a terrorist organisation, on October 7 that year.

The subsequent war has killed more than 67,000 Palestinians, according to Gaza's Health Ministry.

https://www.9news.com.au/national/court-to-rule-on-pro-palestinian-sydney-opera-house-protest/b6015975-2bba-4da0-8455-c0b3af29cefc

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2V2o-efvH48

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122356

File: ec54edc37997ce8⋯.jpg (202.9 KB,1280x720,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23713275 (090913ZOCT25) Notable: ‘Terrible cost for the world’: Taiwan must not fall, warns Scott Morrison – Former prime minister Scott Morrison has warned that surrendering Taiwan to China would amount to “appeasement” and come at a “terrible cost” for global security. Speaking at a defence forum in Taipei, Morrison said a Chinese takeover would push US forces out of East Asia and provide Beijing with a “springboard” to project power into the Pacific. He urged the West to boost defence spending and strengthen deterrence while Donald Trump’s presence in the White House “deters any hasty action by President Xi.” Morrison said Taiwan’s fall would cripple the global semiconductor industry and embolden autocratic powers such as Russia and Iran. US senators also warned that recent Chinese naval drills near Australia were intended to intimidate.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109316 (pb)

>>109396 (pb)

>>122162

>>122158

>>122161

‘Terrible cost for the world’: Taiwan must not fall, warns Scott Morrison

BEN PACKHAM and JOE KELLY - 9 October 2025

1/2

Scott Morrison has warned abandoning Taiwan to the Chinese Communist Party would amount to “appeasement”, urging the West and its partners to rapidly boost military spending and prepare their societies for conflict while Donald Trump’s presence in the White House deters Chinese President Xi Jinping from invading the self-governed territory.

The former prime minister and architect of the AUKUS submarine pact said if China was able to seize Taiwan, it would come at a “terrible cost” for the world, banishing US forces from East Asia and providing Beijing with a “springboard” to project military power into the Pacific.

His comments, in a speech to a Taiwanese defence think tank on Wednesday, followed warnings from Australia’s top national security official, Andrew Shearer, that the security environment was rapidly deteriorating as China and other authoritarian regimes sought to “distract and divide us … and chip away at our resolve”.

The US congress also sounded a bipartisan call on Wednesday (AEST) for America and its allies to stand firm against Chinese coercion, amid questions by a senior Republican senator on whether the US could rely on Australian support in the event of a Taiwan contingency.

Anthony Albanese has been determined to stabilise Australia’s ties with Beijing after the tensions of the Morrison years, and has pointedly resisted US calls for the nation to pre-commit to defending Taiwan from Chinese aggression. But Mr Morrison said he was concerned that many in the West ­believed it was “better not to poke the dragon”.

“This should be understood as appeasement,” he said, arguing it was important to “be clear about what is at stake”.

This would include the pushing back of US forces to the “second island chain” beyond the Philippine Sea, Mr Morrison said, “diminishing their ability to provide an effective security counterbalance”.

He said Beijing could then project power into the region, “pushing missile arcs deep into the western Pacific” and exposing more states to routine coercion.

Mr Morrison said he believed Mr Xi’s 2027 deadline for his military forces to be ready to take Taiwan was likely to pass without incident, arguing “the presence of President Trump of itself is likely to deter any hasty action by President Xi in the short term”.

“However, that only takes us to the end of 2028,” he said.

“The task now therefore is to take advantage of potential extra time and get on with the work of resilience and deterrence.”

He said if Taiwan – which lies at the heart of the West’s dominance of the global semiconductor industry – were to fall to China, “there would not be a corner of the globe that would be unaffected”.

“Failure by the US and its allies to prevent or reverse the seizure of Taiwan leads regional states to accept PRC (People’s Republic of China) primacy and even hegemony in the region,” Mr Morrison said.

“This in turn creates a more conducive environment for the spread of autocratic and authoritarian regimes in the region, under the PRC’s shelter.

“Further afield we also cannot ignore the encouragement this would give to autocratic regimes such as Russia, Iran and many more to chance their arm.”

He added that the economic consequences of a full Chinese invasion of Taiwan “would make the global Covid-19 shutdown look like a sneeze”.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122357

File: f1d5b2f0fa27213⋯.jpg (311.35 KB,2047x1152,2047:1152,Clipboard.jpg)

File: e65dff045271ff6⋯.jpg (325.06 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: e9864662ba631eb⋯.jpg (338.33 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23713306 (090932ZOCT25) Notable: US Marines bid farewell to ‘unprecedented’ time in Darwin but taking NT toughness with them – About 2,500 US Marines have departed the Northern Territory after what Commander Colonel Jason Armas called an “unprecedented” six-month deployment. Speaking at RAAF Base Darwin, Armas said the rotation included record levels of training with Australian forces, from Talisman Sabre 2025 to joint exercises across the Indo-Pacific. He said the experience strengthened “stability” and “interoperability” while teaching “grit, resilience and toughness.” Marines also completed 3,000 hours of community service. ADF Group Captain Melissa Neilson said the program “epitomises the strong relationship” between Australia and the US and that friendships forged in Darwin will “set us up for success into the future.”

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109310 (pb)

>>109558 (pb)

>>109495 (pb)

>>122212

>>122228

US Marines bid farewell to ‘unprecedented’ time in Darwin but taking NT toughness with them

Marine Rotation Force - Commander Colonel Jason Armas said the last six months shows the strength of the bond between Australia and the US.

Lottie Hood - October 8, 2025

As thousands of US Marines leave the Top End, their Colonel said they were taking a Northern Territory training souvenir home with them.

At the RAAF Base Darwin on Wednesday, many of the 2,500 Marine Rotation Force Darwin (MRF-D) bid farewell to the Territory after a “fantastic” busy six-month rotation.

Speaking with media before their flight, Marine Rotation Force - Commander Colonel Jason Armas said it has been an “unprecedented” rotation due to the scale and number of exercises the Marines were able to carry out in the Northern Territory alongside the Australian Defence Force.

He said the strong relationships built between Australia and US forces during that time help bring “stability” to the region and strengthens their joint skills.

Colonel Armas also said he had learnt tough takes on a whole new meaning in the NT and he was determined to take that “grit, resilience and toughness” back with them to Southern California.

“It has been just an incredible experience for all the Marines and sailors of the rotational force throughout this summer,” Colonel Armas said.

“Any opportunity we have to exercise with other partners and allies gives a different perspective, different ways of doing things and we can learn from each other and that is an absolute benefit.

“It enhances our interoperability to the point where we’re interchangeable.

“It shows growth and what I truly believe is it brings that stability to the Indo Pacific.”

Throughout their time in the Northern Territory, the MRF-D and ADF forces participated together in a wide range of activities in the Northern Territory and Queensland over the last six months.

These included Exercise Talisman Sabre which saw 30,000 military personnel from 19 nations participate in one of Australia’s largest ever war games exercise.

They also teamed up with allies and carried out complex exercises in the Philippines, Japan Indonesia, New Caledonia and Papua New Guinea.

But it was not just the exercises that Colonel Armas said Marines enjoyed in the Territory.

Lifelong memories were also made through attending special events like Barunga Festival and taking part in various football and rugby events.

Colonel Jason C. Armas said Marines also carried out around 3,000 hours of community service alongside ADF and that as a result, Marines and sailors know “Saint Vinnies quite well” now.

“For me and for the Marine Corps it is a priority for us to continue our training here in Australia and then start to move and evolve that training forward,” he said.

“This has been an incredible experience and we look forward to continuing the rotation as we move forward with it.

“It epitomises strength of the relationship between Australia and the US and it continues to grow and expand.”

ADF Northern Command, Group Captain, Melissa Neilson, said it seemed like only yesterday they were welcoming their 14th rotation of US visitors.

“The MT Program continues to get stronger every year and epitomises the strong relationship that Australia and the US do have and our deep engagement in that Indo Pacific,” she said.

“What is perhaps less tangible is relationships.

“The friendships that we have formed and we will continue to knowing we have a number of Marines that are returning on multiple deployments.

“It is the strong friendship that is based on neutral trust, respect, and loyalty that really sets us up for success into the future.”

https://www.ntnews.com.au/news/us-marines-bid-farewell-to-unprecedented-time-in-darwin-but-taking-nt-toughness-with-them/news-story/b7d3865a1d544e302811d714584e10a3

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122358

File: 9450044a83493a9⋯.jpg (1.64 MB,3000x1997,3000:1997,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 3825fe18d092434⋯.jpg (2.71 MB,3000x2001,1000:667,Clipboard.jpg)

File: cbce2666f609d06⋯.jpg (440.99 KB,750x1171,750:1171,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 3720b8e9849db79⋯.jpg (296.59 KB,750x1180,75:118,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 0aa45c2e272709b⋯.jpg (725.41 KB,750x1831,750:1831,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23722450 (110929ZOCT25) Notable: Venezuela’s Maria Corina Machado wins Nobel Peace Prize, sparking White House anger – Venezuelan opposition leader Maria Corina Machado has won the 2025 Nobel Peace Prize for her decades-long fight for democracy under the Maduro regime, prompting outrage from allies of US President Donald Trump, who had lobbied for the award. Nobel Committee chair Jorgen Watne Frydnes praised Machado for keeping “the flame of democracy burning” in Venezuela, where she remains in hiding. Trump’s spokesman Steven Cheung said the committee “placed politics over peace,” while Machado partly dedicated her award to Trump for his “decisive support” of Venezuela’s democratic movement. The committee cited her courage in uniting opposition forces and defending “the principles of popular rule” amid growing global threats to democracy.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122322

>>122354

Venezuela’s Maria Corina Machado wins Nobel Peace Prize, sparking White House anger

David Crowe - October 10, 2025

1/2

London: Venezuelan campaigner Maria Corina Machado has won the Nobel Peace Prize for her work defying dictatorship in her home country, triggering angry criticism from allies of US President Donald Trump who believe he should have won because of his efforts to end the war in Gaza.

Trump has openly sought the prize this year and one of his top aides rebuked the Nobel Committee for its decision, but Machado responded by partly dedicating the award to the president for his support for democracy in her country.

Machado is in hiding in Venezuela after campaigning for free and fair elections for more than two decades, and she has refused to leave the country even as 8 million of her fellow citizens have fled autocratic rule.

Born in 1967, she trained in engineering and finance before entering politics in 2002, and she gained support as an opposition candidate for the presidency last year. The government barred her from running, and in August last year she went into hiding.

Nobel Committee chair Jorgen Watne Frydnes praised her as a woman who kept the “flame of democracy burning amidst a growing darkness” in her country and around the world.

“Maria Corina Machado is one of the most extraordinary examples of civilian courage in Latin America,” he said.

“Ms Machado has been a key unifying figure in a political opposition that was once deeply divided, an opposition that found common ground in the demand for free elections and representative government.”

Machado was briefly detained by authorities in January, when she attended a rally calling for fair elections, but she managed to return to hiding and remains in touch with Edmundo Gonzalez, recognised by the US and other nations as the rightful winner of last year’s presidential election.

In a video released by the Nobel Committee that showed Machado being told of the award by phone, she struggled for some moments to find the words to respond to the news.

“Thank you so much. I hope you understand this is a movement, this is an achievement of a whole society. I am just one person,” she said.

“I certainly do not deserve this. Oh my god.”

Nobel Committee secretary Olav Njolstad replied: “I think both the movement and you deserve it.”

Asked on Thursday about his chances of winning the prize, Trump said he had ended eight wars including the conflict in Gaza but that he had not done so to win the award.

“They’ll have to do what they do. Whatever they do is fine,” he said of the Nobel Committee. “I know this: I didn’t do it for that, I did it because I saved a lot of lives.”

The White House rebuked the Nobel Committee after the award was revealed, saying Trump had made peace deals, ended wars and saved lives.

“He has the heart of a humanitarian, and there will never be anyone like him who can move mountains with the sheer force of his will,” said White House spokesman Steven Cheung, a long-time aide to the president.

“The Nobel Committee proved they place politics over peace.”

Machado, however, thanked Trump for his support for democracy in Venezuela.

“We are on the threshold of victory and today, more than ever, we count on President Trump, the people of the United States, the peoples of Latin America, and the democratic nations of the world as our principal allies to achieve Freedom and democracy,” she wrote on X.

“I dedicate this prize to the suffering people of Venezuela and to President Trump for his decisive support of our cause!”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122359

File: fa2a3b082fdf5c9⋯.jpg (862.11 KB,2700x1754,1350:877,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23722558 (111038ZOCT25) Notable: China further limits the export of rare earth materials and products – China has tightened controls on rare-earth exports, requiring new licences for technologies used in mining, smelting and production-line maintenance. The move, effective immediately, extends earlier restrictions on the minerals critical to global auto, defence and electronics industries. Beijing said the curbs target foreign entities transferring Chinese-origin materials for “sensitive military use,” citing national security risks. The European Commission expressed concern, urging China to remain a “reliable partner.” The US and EU have accused Beijing of weaponising supply chains, while both are ramping up local production and recycling efforts to reduce reliance. China controls 40 per cent of global reserves and dominates refining operations worldwide.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109569 (pb)

>>109240 (pb)

>>122175

>>122176

>>122321

China further limits the export of rare earth materials and products

AFP/ABC - 10 October 2025

China has announced new controls on the export of rare-earth technologies and associated items, adding to regulations on a critical industry that has been a key source of tension between Beijing and Washington.

China is the world's leading producer of the minerals used to make magnets crucial to the auto, electronics and defence industries.

It has required licences for certain exports of the materials since April, hitting global manufacturing sectors.

Rare earths have been a sticking point in recent trade negotiations between Beijing and Washington, with the US accusing China of slow-walking export licence approvals.

The new controls, which kick in immediately, mean exporters must obtain permission for technologies used for rare-earth mining and smelting, among other processing steps, a Chinese commerce ministry statement said.

They will also apply to technologies used in the "assembly, adjusting, maintenance, repair and upgrading of production lines", it said.

The ministry said separately that restrictions would be placed on foreign entities that export related items outside China.

The controls will require such exporters to obtain a permit before making certain shipments, the statement said, adding that applications to overseas military users would not be approved.

"For some time, some overseas organisations and individuals have directly or after processing transferred or provided controlled rare-earth items originating in China … for direct or indirect use in sensitive areas such as military operations," a ministry spokesperson said in a statement.

The practice had caused "significant damage or potential threats to China's national security and interests (and) adversely impacted international peace and stability".

The European Commission said on Thursday it was "concerned" by China's announcement of the new controls.

"The commission expects China to act as a reliable partner and to ensure stable, predictable access to critical raw materials," EU trade spokesman Olof Gill told reporters.

Businesses affected worldwide

The restrictions imposed by Beijing this year have caused significant disruption in worldwide industries, with some companies facing halts to production as supply of the key minerals dwindles.

European Union chief Ursula von der Leyen said after a tense summit in Beijing in July that leaders had agreed to an improved mechanism for Chinese exports of rare earths to the bloc.

However, a business lobby warned last month that European firms still faced challenges in securing access to the materials.

The European Union and the United States are both trying to boost their own production of rare earths and better recycle what they use to reduce dependence on Beijing.

The United States Geological Survey estimated In a 2024 assessment that there were 110 million tonnes of deposits worldwide, including 44 million in China.

A further 22 million tonnes are estimated in Brazil and 21 million in Vietnam, while Russia has 10 million and India seven million tonnes.

Beijing has for decades made the most of its reserves by investing massively in refining operations, often without the strict environmental oversight required in Western countries.

China has also filed a huge number of patents on rare earth production, an obstacle to companies elsewhere hoping to launch large-scale processing.

As a result, many firms find it cheaper to ship their ore to China for refining, further reinforcing the world's reliance.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-10-10/china-rare-earth-exports-limited-further/105874886

https://www.mofcom.gov.cn/xwfb/xwfyrth/art/2025/art_16a0593dcadd4030959c3691cf39bb26.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122360

File: f809df8cf704fb9⋯.mp4 (13.42 MB,640x360,16:9,Clipboard.mp4)

File: 41724f2044ceeb0⋯.jpg (1.51 MB,814x1967,814:1967,Clipboard.jpg)

File: a65d245951b9a80⋯.jpg (703.2 KB,814x1071,814:1071,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23722664 (111147ZOCT25) Notable: Video: Trump threatens to impose additional 100% tariff on China – US President Donald Trump has vowed to impose a new 100% tariff on Chinese imports from next month, accusing Beijing of “becoming very hostile” and attempting to hold the world “captive” through its control of rare earth exports. Trump said he might cancel a planned meeting with President Xi Jinping but later clarified he would attend “regardless.” The warning follows China’s new export restrictions and additional port fees for US-linked ships, escalating an already tense trade standoff. Trump also announced forthcoming export controls on critical software, calling the measures necessary to “protect American industry and national security” as both sides prepare for difficult trade talks in South Korea.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109569 (pb)

>>109240 (pb)

>>122175

>>122321

>>122359

Trump threatens to impose additional 100% tariff on China

Natalie Sherman - 11 October 2025

US President Donald Trump has said he would impose an additional 100% tariff on imports from China from next month.

In a post on social media, Trump said the US would also put export controls on critical software.

In an earlier post on Friday, he hit back at Beijing's move this week to tighten its rules for exports of rare earths, accusing China of "becoming very hostile" and trying to hold the world "captive".

He threatened to pull out of a meeting with China's President Xi Jinping. He later said he had not cancelled it, but that he did not know "that we're going to have it".

"I'm going to be there regardless," he told reporters at the White House.

Financial markets dropped in the wake of Trump's remarks, with the S&P 500 closing down 2.7%, its steepest fall since April.

China dominates production of rare earths and certain other key materials, which are key components in cars, smartphones and many other items.

The last time Beijing tightened export controls - after Trump raised tariffs on Chinese goods early this year - there was an outcry from many US firms reliant on the materials. Carmaker Ford even had to temporarily pause production.

In addition to tightening rules for rare earth exports, China has opened a monopoly investigation into the US tech firm Qualcomm that could stall its acquisition of another chipmaker.

Although Qualcomm is based in the US, a significant portion of its business is concentrated in China.

Beijing has also said it will charge new port fees to ships with ties to the US, including those owned or operated by US firms.

"Some very strange things are happening in China!" Trump wrote in a post on social media on Friday. "They are becoming very hostile."

The US and China have been in a fragile trade détente since May, when the two sides agreed to drop triple-digit tariffs on each others' goods that had nearly stopped trade between the two countries.

The move left US tariffs on Chinese goods facing an added 30% levy compared with the start of the year, while US goods entering China face a new 10% tariff.

Officials have held a series of talks since then on matters including TikTok, agricultural purchases, and the trade of rare earths and advanced technology like semiconductors.

The two sides were expected to meet again this month at a summit in South Korea.

China expert Jonathan Czin, a fellow at the Brookings Institution, said Xi's recent actions were a bid to shape the upcoming talks, noting that the recent rare earths directive does not go into effect immediately.

"He's looking for ways to seize the initiative," he said. "The Trump administration is having to play a game of whack-a-mole and deal with these issues as they come up."

He added that he did not think China was worried about US retaliation in response.

"What China took away from the Liberation Day tariffs and the cycle of escalation followed by de-escalation is that the Chinese side had a higher pain threshold," he said. "From their perspective, the Trump administration blinked."

In prior rounds of trade talks, China has pushed for looser US restrictions on semiconductors. It is also interested in securing more stable tariff policies that would make it easier for its businesses to sell into the US.

Xi had previously used as leverage his country's dominance of rare earths production.

But the export rules unveiled this week target overseas defence manufacturers, making them particularly serious, said Gracelin Baskaran, director of the critical minerals security program at Washington-based Center for Strategic and International Studies.

"Nothing makes America move like targeting our defence industry," she said. "The US is going to have to negotiate because we have limited options, and in an era of rising geopolitical tension and potential conflict, we need to build our industrial defence base."

While a Trump-Xi meeting now looks unlikely, she said it was not necessarily completely off the table. Ms Baskaran said there's still time and room for talks. China's new rules don't take effect until December.

"Negotiations are likely imminent," she said. "Who does them and where they happen will be determined with time."

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cn4wkd7729po

https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/115350455734003647

https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/115351840469973590

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122361

File: 15d8b2cf1a68e9f⋯.jpg (121.96 KB,1200x800,3:2,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23722676 (111151ZOCT25) Notable: Anthony Albanese will offer priority access to Australia’s critical minerals and rare earths to Donald Trump – Prime Minister Anthony Albanese will offer US President Donald Trump priority access to Australia’s critical minerals and rare earths to help reduce Washington’s reliance on China for key defence and energy resources. The plan would make the US and UK preferred buyers under a new strategic supply framework, with details to be finalised during Albanese’s visit to the White House on October 20. An industry source said the success of Australia’s $1.2 billion critical minerals reserve “hinges” on Trump’s approval. The proposal follows US moves to secure alternative sources after Beijing tightened rare earth exports.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109569 (pb)

>>122175

>>122321

>>122359

>>122360

Anthony Albanese will offer priority access to Australia’s critical minerals and rare earths to Donald Trump

Katina Curtis - 6 October 2025

Anthony Albanese will offer Donald Trump priority access to Australia’s critical minerals and rare earths when they meet this month so the US Defence industry isn’t reliant on China for the vital supplies.

The US and the UK will be given the chance to become preferred buyers for Australia’s rare earths after weeks of talks between the Prime Minister and strategic partners, The West understands.

But an industry source close to discussions says the future of the planned critical minerals strategic reserve will hinge on Mr Albanese’s visit to the White House in just over a fortnight.

Australia needs to sign up friendly nations as buyers for its critical minerals to give the sector the financial stability it needs to get off the ground.

“If Trump says ‘yes’, the US is on board, this will work,” the industry source said.

Mr Albanese has had talks with other strategic partners about access to Australia’s resources, including UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer and Canada’s Mark Carney.

The PM last week raised the possibility of the sector being brought in under the AUKUS defence agreement umbrella.

Critical minerals and rare earths are crucial to defence uses and the energy transition.

Over the past 15-20 years, China has all but cornered the market in their production, giving it enormous control.

Its willingness to slap export restrictions on key resources has spurred the Trump administration into action to find new supplies.

Resources company executives who joined an Austrade delegation to Washington and New York in September told The West this week that it was clear the Trump administration had made “a real aggressive timetable shift” in terms of how quickly it wanted to access critical minerals outside of China.

The White House has previously aired its concerns about being heavily dependent on supplies from “adversarial nations”.

One potential glitch ahead of the October 20 meeting is if the government shutdown in Washington isn’t resolved and American bureaucrats can’t finalise any agreement from their end.

However, it’s expected that even if final details aren’t nutted out, Mr Albanese has enough to offer the President, given the resources Australia can offer.

“Whether you’re looking at lithium with the reserves that we have, or cobalt or copper or vanadium, we have great resources,” he said last week.

Design work on the $1.2 billion strategic reserve announced during the election campaign is now underway.

It’s likely to include either the government guaranteeing a floor price or taking a position as a buyer of last resort.

It’s expected to cover rare earths initially and start running in the second half of 2026.

Peak industry body, the Association of Mining and Exploration Companies, has brought on board Resources Minister Madeleine King’s former critical minerals adviser Sash Pavic as it helps the Government design how the strategic reserve could work.

It’s also added former WA government chief of staff Tarnya Widdicombe to its team.

The hirings give AMEC — which was also behind the production tax credits policy — closer ties to Labor governments at State and Federal levels.

“We’re looking forward to both Sash and Tarnya applying their skills and networks to strengthen AMEC’s advocacy on behalf of our members,” AMEC chief executive Warren Pearce said.

Privately, federal ministers make little secret of tensions in the government’s relationship with rival industry group the Minerals Council of Australia.

Australia’s critical minerals are also drawing interest from Canada, Europe, Japan and Korea, with the Quad and G7 forums looking at ways for members to shift away from relying on China.

Industry Minister Tim Ayres and Energy Minister Chris Bowen will host a summit in November for investors looking to bring their money to Australian projects.

https://thewest.com.au/politics/federal-politics/albanese-will-offer-priority-access-to-australias-critical-minerals-and-rare-earths-to-trump-usa-c-20221900

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122362

File: fec49f80dc53089⋯.mp4 (15.45 MB,640x360,16:9,Clipboard.mp4)

File: 39ce9d5cbf1621f⋯.jpg (292.01 KB,2048x1153,2048:1153,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23722812 (111250ZOCT25) Notable: Video: Anthony Scaramucci warns Albanese to ‘co-produce’ meeting with Trump – Former White House communications director Anthony Scaramucci has urged Prime Minister Anthony Albanese to “be very careful” when meeting US President Donald Trump, warning him to “co-produce” the encounter and avoid being “set up” for spectacle. Scaramucci said Albanese should seek advice from Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney, who “deals with him better than any other Western leader.” The financier-turned-political commentator, sacked by Trump after 10 days in 2017, said foreign leaders risk humiliation if unprepared. His comments come ahead of Albanese’s October 20 White House visit, where Trump is expected to push hard on trade and defence priorities.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122300

>>122310

>>122311

>>122321

>>122345

Anthony Scaramucci’s advice to our PM is to seek his Canadian counterpart’s counsel

ERIC JOHNSTON - October 10, 2025

1/3

As Anthony Albanese prepares to head off to finally have a sit down meeting with Donald Trump in the Oval Office, the US President’s former (and famously brief) communications boss has some advice.

“Be very careful,” says Anthony Scaramucci. “He (Albanese) should certainly pick up the phone and call (Canadian) Prime Minister Carney, because Carney deals with him better than any other Western leader.”

Carney has cracked the code with the US President by basically ignoring Trump, or if he has to see him to make sure he has a hand in the agenda.

Scaramucci is precise with his words. “Remember, the President is an unserious reality television star, and he’s also a reality television producer. If you’re not careful, you’re going to get set up in there.”

Here he’s talking about meetings in the White House that have quickly gone off the rails, all in front of the cameras. There’s the memorable clash with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and plenty of excruciating moments with South Africa’s Cyril Ramaphosa. Many other leaders have come off second best.

“I would just say Prime Minister, make sure that you’re co-producing your appearance. You need to know what the script is. You need to know what the ambush is going to be. And if you go to (White House chief of staff) Suzie Wiles and you get guarantees from her, like Mark Carney has gotten, then it’ll go way better.

“Get in. Produce it well. Be respectful. Get out. That’s my recommendation.”

The New York hedge fund boss Scaramucci exploded on the word stage back in 2017 when Donald Trump named the tough-talking asset manager a communications director during Trump’s first term. ‘The Mooch’ gave as good as he got and the two quickly clashed. Scaramucci was spectacularly sacked after just 10 days in the post.

That moment also brutally ended a friendship between the two that stretched back decades. In the 1990s, Scaramucci was the working-class kid from Long Island trying to make it as a banker with Goldman Sachs. He was one of the few on Wall Street who took Trump seriously.

Following the White House implosion, Scaramucci retreated back to SkyBridge, the hedge fund he founded in 2005.

The acrimony is still real – he has become a high-profile critic of Trump. The lifelong Republican even endorsed former vice president Kamala Harris in her bid for the White House.

Beyond Wall Street, The Mooch is better known for his cutting takes on US politics in the popular podcast The Rest is Politics: US, which he hosts with BBC’s long-term North American correspondent Katty Kay.

The Mooch is set to come to Australia next month, where he will be one of the keynote speakers at the Sohn Hearts & Minds investment conference at the Sydney Opera House, where the proceeds will be directed towards medical research, A decade of Sohn conferences has so far raised more than $80m.

The Mooch is speaking to The Australian via a video link from the back of a limousine, making a 20-mile trip from his home in Long Island to Midtown. He’s dressed up, wearing a sharp black dinner suit with trademark designer sunglasses. He’s headed to a charity food bank gala at Guastavino’s for the evening that mixes arts with giving (Italian tenor Andrea Bocelli is set to give a performance).

Back seat interviews are becoming a habit. When The Australian caught up with The Mooch earlier this year, he was in an Uber. At the time, he was making an anxious dash from his office downtown to the notoriously impossible to get into Italian restaurant Rao’s in East Harlem (a seat had suddenly become available, and Scaramucci had to drop everything to get there).

“There’s probably seven or eight tables in Rao’s,” he says. “They’re controlled by families that have had the tables forever. Even if you’re Warren Buffett, you’ve got to sit at somebody’s table. They won’t take a reservation!”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122363

File: 2660b989a25405a⋯.jpg (171.96 KB,1280x720,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 81abbea4047bcae⋯.jpg (582.61 KB,1739x2319,1739:2319,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 3d4454d99e617cd⋯.jpg (812.67 KB,2045x2727,2045:2727,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 674dd3daf2b5b8d⋯.jpg (1.92 MB,3000x2000,3:2,Clipboard.jpg)

File: a5e4c59d4f0c929⋯.jpg (192.08 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23722890 (111321ZOCT25) Notable: Defence bans cookbook reprints, focuses on $20bn missile industry – Defence has stopped further print runs of the Taste of Harmony cookbook, created by the Guided Weapons and Explosive Ordnance (GWEO) group, after criticism it distracted from Australia’s $20 billion domestic missile program. Air Marshal Leon Phillips defended the project as part of Defence’s “cultural blueprint,” saying such initiatives help staff “bring their authentic self to work.” He said the $1800 cookbook cost was minor compared to progress on missile manufacturing, citing contracts with Kongsberg and Lockheed Martin. Phillips confirmed the cookbook would not return, adding the focus is now on expanding production of naval and ground-based weapons systems.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109301 (pb)

Defence bans cookbook reprints, focuses on $20bn domestic missile industry

BEN PACKHAM - October 09, 2025

Defence has banned further print runs of the Taste of Harmony cookbook produced by the department’s Guided Weapons and Explosive Ordnance group, as the commander behind the initiative said it was in line with the force’s “cultural blueprint”.

The Australian revealed in July that the GWEO group, headed by Air Marshal Leon Phillips, produced the cookbook with taxpayer funds amid concerns over the progress of the government’s plan to domestically produce guided weapons.

Air Marshal Phillips defended the cookbook in a Senate estimates hearing on Thursday, rejecting suggestions his group was moving “at snail’s pace” on its primary mission to establish a $20bn domestic missile industry.

Opposition senator Sarah Henderson said the recipe book suggested “strange priorities at a time of significant challenge to our nation”.

Air Marshal Phillips said it was “not a distraction”.

While US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth has vowed to stamp out “woke” initiatives across America’s military, Air Marshal Phillips said such activities “pay us back in spades if people feel they can bring their authentic self to work”.

“In accordance with Defence’s cultural blueprint, observing Harmony Day is one way that Defence demonstrates its commitment to fostering a culturally diverse workforce.

“It’s just one of a range of initi­atives we do to … make sure our staff feel they’re valued, professionally and personally, with the effort they need to do,” he said.

Air Marshal Phillips confirmed the cookbook cost taxpayers about $1800, as reported by The Australian, and said his recipe for spaghetti ai gamberi was contributed in his own time.

He denied he had been ordered to bury the cookbook because of concerns over the GWEO group’s progress, but said there would be no repeat of the initiative.

“I think the secretary (Greg Moriarty) is suggesting we won’t have a further edition of the cookbook,” Air Marshal Phillips said.

He batted away suggestions the GWEO group was making ­little progress, pointing to an $850m contract with Norway’s Kongsberg Defence to manufacture naval strike missiles.

Air Marshal Phillips said Defence had a contract with Lockheed Martin to “manufacture GMLRS missiles by the end of the year”. That contract is expected to authorise the assembly of a small number of the US-produced rockets with imported parts.

Air Marshal Phillips said Australia was also producing a “whole range of GWEO devices”, including artillery shells.

“And obviously we have more ambitious plans that we’ve outlined to get into far more complicated, more complex weapons as well,” he said.

He said cancellation of a tender that had been awarded to French-owned Thales to produce US-standard 155mm artillery rounds in Benalla was because of “a change in the global manufacturing environment”.

Air Marshal Phillips said the Thales factory would continue to produce 5-inch naval shells.

Defence Industry Minister Pat Conroy had previously claimed the artillery shell contract would produce 15,000 rounds a year by 2028, with the capacity to scale up to 100,000 rounds and support 550 jobs.

The contract is now likely to go to Queensland-based defence company Nioa, which already had a facility producing European 155mm rounds that could be retooled to deliver the US-standard shells required by Australia.

The Taste of Diversity cookbook included recipes for a “Mystery meat stir fry”, and a “Loaded potato soup”.

Air Marshal Phillips, a keen amateur gourmet, urged his subordinates to pair his pasta dish “with great company and a lovely dry riesling”.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/defence/defence-bans-cookbook-reprints-focuses-on-20bn-domestic-missile-industry/news-story/6da179fe52201c7b6621a884503b0dd0

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122364

File: 5129add994b7883⋯.jpg (457.93 KB,3800x3040,5:4,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23722906 (111327ZOCT25) Notable: 4chan unlikely to face under-16s social media ban, says eSafety chief – eSafety Commissioner Julie Inman Grant has indicated 4chan will not be blocked under Australia’s upcoming ban on social media use by under-16s, despite calling it “one of the darker sites on the web.” In Senate estimates, Inman Grant said the 10 December ban would focus on “mainstream” platforms such as TikTok, Instagram, Facebook, YouTube, X and Snapchat. She said 4chan would instead face regulation under new codes covering violent and adult content, requiring age assurance and carrying fines of up to $49.5 million. The commissioner confirmed some major platforms had accepted her classification, while others were resisting.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122249

>>122303

>>122304

4chan unlikely to be included in Australia’s under-16s social media ban, eSafety commissioner says

Julie Inman Grant says message board will need to comply with other codes which will also include age assurance for sites hosting violent and adult content

Josh Taylor - 9 Oct 2025

The eSafety commissioner is not expected to block children from accessing 4chan as part of the under-16s social media ban, despite it being labelled one of the “darker” places on the internet.

The eSafety commissioner, Julie Inman Grant, was asked by independent senator Fatima Payman in Senate estimates on Wednesday night whether 4chan, the message board often referred to as the engine room of the internet, would be considered one of the sites required to prevent under-16s when the social media ban comes into effect from 10 December.

It came after 4chan’s lawyer reportedly stated the website would not be paying a proposed fine for failing to comply with the UK’s online safety laws.

Inman Grant did not rule out that 4chan may be considered in the future.

Inman Grant indicated 4chan would be required to comply with other codes due to come into effect at the end of this year and early next year, which will also include age assurance for sites hosting violent and adult content.

“They would be considered as part of our designated internet services. So they will have obligations under those codes, and those would be the powers that we would use if it were necessary, and they cover, they carry the same ultimate fine of $49.5m.”

Inman Grant said the focus of the under-16s ban was “mainstream” social media sites “that a lot of children were using and spending a lot of time and being exposed to addictive design features like opaque algorithms and endless scroll”.

“I would consider 4chan one of the darker sites on the web. These are things that we do deal with through both our phase-one and now soon our phase-two codes, but also through our illegal and restricted content scheme, because that’s where a lot of terrible content sits.”

Last month Inman Grant sent letters to 16 services to ask them to conduct a self-assessment on whether they believe the under-16s ban should apply to them, after which Inman Grant will state if she agrees ahead of the 10 December implementation date.

Inman Grant revealed on Wednesday she had advised the federal government that it is her view the ban should apply to YouTube, Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, X and Snapchat. She said some of the platforms had replied agreeing with her view, while some are likely to take an “alternative view”.

https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2025/oct/09/4chan-not-blocked-australia-under-16s-social-media-ban

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122365

File: aba6b6cf8ce30ea⋯.jpg (317.28 KB,1873x1282,1873:1282,Clipboard.jpg)

File: daa9c8a2ec16cc9⋯.jpg (2.22 MB,5000x3333,5000:3333,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 1e7cf2cddf6b9c6⋯.jpg (2.21 MB,5000x3333,5000:3333,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 7e63c5840cdbebb⋯.jpg (104.04 KB,900x600,3:2,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23722976 (111350ZOCT25) Notable: David Sharaz served bankruptcy papers by Linda Reynolds after defamation win – Former senator Linda Reynolds has served bankruptcy papers on Brittany Higgins’s husband, David Sharaz, as she seeks to recover damages from a Perth defamation case. Mr Sharaz, who did not defend the action, was ordered to pay $85,000 and is jointly liable with Ms Higgins for more than $1 million in legal costs. Ms Reynolds said Mr Sharaz had “agreed to accept service” after forcing her to incur further costs applying for substituted service orders. He now has 21 days to pay or face formal bankruptcy proceedings. The defamation case followed social media posts Ms Reynolds said had “trashed her reputation” and caused severe distress.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122229

>>122232

>>122270

>>122273

>>122348

David Sharaz served bankruptcy papers by former WA Senator Linda Reynolds after defamation win

Andrea Mayes - 10 October 2025

Brittany Higgins's husband David Sharaz has been served bankruptcy papers by former Senator Linda Reynolds, as she tries to recover damages awarded to her by a Perth court for defamation.

In August Ms Higgins was ordered to pay Ms Reynolds $315,000 plus costs after she and Mr Sharaz were found to have defamed the former senator in a series of social media posts.

Ms Higgins was also ordered to pay Ms Reynolds's costs.

The former WA MP was represented in court by a team of barristers led by Martin Bennett, who confirmed her legal bill had exceeded one million dollars.

Bankruptcy papers served

Mr Sharaz, who opted not to defend the legal action, was ordered to pay $85,000, with Justice Tottle ruling both he and Ms Higgins were jointly liable for the bill.

Today Ms Reynolds confirmed Mr Sharaz had been served the bankruptcy papers.

"Mr Sharaz today agreed to accept service of the Bankruptcy Notice I had issued to him several weeks ago, but not before forcing me to incur further legal expenses in applying for substituted service orders," she said in a statement.

"Again, this is predictable conduct that I have unfortunately become accustomed to in the pursuit of justice.

"Mr Sharaz now has 21 days to pay the debt or I will proceed to apply to formally bankrupt him."

Long-running saga

The legal action was launched by Ms Reynolds following social media posts made by Ms Higgins beginning in 2022.

The former senator argued the posts trashed her reputation and caused her immense distress, following a period of ill health.

Ms Higgins wrote the posts four years after she was raped in the then-senator's office by her colleague Bruce Lehrmann.

The finding of rape was made last year by Justice Michael Lee during a separate defamation action Mr Lehrmann had launched in the Federal Court against Channel 10 and journalist Lisa Wilkinson.

That finding was made on the balance of probabilities, the standard of proof in a civil court matter.

Separate criminal proceedings against Mr Lehrmann, which require a charge to be proved beyond reasonable doubt, were discontinued after juror misconduct and concerns for Ms Higgins's welfare.

Mr Lehrmann has always denied raping Ms Higgins.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-10-10/linda-reynolds-brittany-higgins-david-sharaz-bankruptcy-served/105878088

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122366

File: 676d6796e01a372⋯.jpg (5.26 MB,3000x2001,1000:667,Clipboard.jpg)

File: ddc9c91a1fc0bba⋯.jpg (3.11 MB,3000x2144,375:268,Clipboard.jpg)

File: b0daf041c5b62e9⋯.jpg (2.7 MB,1023x5780,1023:5780,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23723129 (111444ZOCT25) Notable: ‘Every single person plays a part’: The sisters who survived Malka Leifer – Three Melbourne sisters at the centre of the Malka Leifer sexual abuse case have shared their story in a new documentary, Surviving Malka Leifer, which details their decades-long pursuit of justice. Nicole Meyer, Dassi Erlich and Elly Sapper endured years of abuse, Leifer’s flight from Australia, and 74 legal hearings before the former school principal was extradited and jailed. The film, directed by Adam Kamien, explores their experiences and recovery. Meyer said revisiting the ordeal was “confronting but empowering”, while Erlich urged viewers to recognise that “every single person plays a part” in addressing abuse. The sisters said the documentary marks a transition from “fighting” to “healing.”

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122335

>>122336

>>122337

‘Every single person plays a part’: The sisters who survived Malka Leifer

The three women at the heart of the decades-long sex abuse case tell their story - and they hope it’s for the last time.

Karl Quinn - OCTOBER 4, 2025

1/2

There’s one word that comes to mind when meeting the three sisters at the centre of the Malka Leifer case. Endurance.

They endured a miserable home life. They endured sexual abuse at the hands of the principal of the ultra-Orthodox Jewish school they attended. They endured years of trickery, lies and evasion from Leifer and her legal team after she fled to Israel and fought extradition. They endured 74 legal hearings in Israel and so many more in Australia that they stopped counting.

And when Leifer was eventually brought to trial in Australia 13 years after fleeing, they endured day after day of withering cross-examination before their abuser was finally found guilty and sentenced to 15 years in prison.

Now, in the documentary Surviving Malka Leifer, they’re enduring another round of questioning from audiences and journalists and well-meaning friends and acquaintances about the whole interminable mess.

Aren’t you tired of re-opening these old (and not-so-old) wounds, I ask them as we sit around the table of a large house in St Kilda that belongs, they say, to a member of their extended family?

“It hasn’t been re-traumatising,” says Nicole Meyer, 40. “It’s been confronting, and we’ve been transported back to where we were when we were filming. It’s a difficult thing to have our vulnerabilities and rawness up there for everyone to see. But at the same time, there’s a sense of pride that we’ve gone through that, we have something to show through it, and here we are today.”

The film, which screened at the Melbourne International Film Festival and at the Jewish International Film Festival, drops on Stan on Sunday. And for middle sister Dassi Erlich, 38, getting it in front of a larger audience is vital.

“A big part of the reason for making it, at least for me, was for people to understand that every single person plays a part in the so-called system,” she says. “The way we see sexual abuse, the way we talk about sexual abuse, the way we understand it, the way we treat survivors, respond to it: it’s not this external thing – it’s something we all are a part of, and we all can make change happen.”

And for youngest sister Elly Sapper, 36, the film serves as a record of what they have been through – and, as the title suggests, to the fact they have survived.

“It feels like we’re looking back onto a space that we once were in, as opposed to being in that space,” she says. “We lived and breathed this for so many years, and now it just feels like we can take that breath, take that moment, and look back and be in that new space. Instead of a fighting space, a healing space.”

The documentary from director Adam Kamien and producer Ivan O’Mahoney tells the story of the sisters’ experiences, individually and collectively, from childhood abuse at home, through the betrayal of the seemingly safe haven of school, the long pursuit of justice, and finally to the trial itself.

Most notably, it spends long slabs of time with the sisters in the hotel where they stayed for the trial, able to support each other but not permitted to share details of their testimony. It captures the moment immediately after Erlich – who had written a book about her experiences – hears the full details of what happened to her sisters when they testify. And it captures the moment when Meyer hears that Leifer has been found not guilty on the charges relating to her abuse (while being found guilty of those relating to her sisters’ abuse).

It’s all incredibly intimate, up-close and raw. And it makes this most public case personal again.

For Meyer, the day of the verdict was complex.

“It was heartbreak. It was devastation,” she says. “Justice drove me for many years, and justice was denied.”

For months, she couldn’t speak about it, and for a while she thought she might never do so again. “And then I realised that ultimately, if I do that, I’m letting her win,” she says. “I felt she had won already by getting a not guilty verdict with my charges, and I thought I don’t want her to win, so I’m going to go out there and just start talking. And that’s what I did, and that really helped me to work on my healing.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122367

File: 5340e41fe66ad8b⋯.jpg (446.36 KB,2880x2160,4:3,Clipboard.jpg)

File: bee54b1e2ba233d⋯.jpg (269.92 KB,2048x1536,4:3,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23726229 (120851ZOCT25) Notable: Albanese scrambles to lock in minerals deal before Trump meeting – Prime Minister Anthony Albanese is rushing to finalise a $1.2 billion critical minerals deal with the United States before meeting President Donald Trump on October 20. A leaked departmental brief shows plans for price floors, government loans and offtake agreements to secure supplies of rare earths vital to defence, clean energy and AI industries. The push comes after Trump threatened 100 per cent tariffs on Chinese goods following Beijing’s new export controls on rare earths. Ukrainian officials have also urged Australia to share mining expertise to support a US-Ukraine minerals deal. Ambassador Kevin Rudd said Australia’s world-class mining capacity makes it “first in line” to strengthen America’s supply chain resilience.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122175

>>122321

>>122359

>>122360

>>122361

Albanese scrambles to lock in minerals deal before Trump meeting

Paul Sakkal - October 12, 2025

1/2

Australia would mandate price floors for critical minerals and pump money into new rare earth projects, according to leaked plans about a resources deal with the US that Prime Minister Anthony Albanese is trying to lock in before meeting President Donald Trump.

Officials from the prime minister’s department have started contacting Australian miners about how they could contribute to the new $1.2 billion critical minerals strategic reserve, according to the confidential departmental brief obtained by this masthead.

On Saturday, Trump threatened to impose a 100 per cent tariff on Chinese goods and cancel a meeting with President Xi Jinping after China moved to dramatically expand export restrictions on critical minerals.

In another sign of the importance of rare earths to the Washington trip, Ukraine has urged Australia to provide the war-torn nation with mining expertise to make Trump’s minerals deal with Volodymyr Zelensky workable.

The departmental brief was sent to miners over the past two weeks, shortly after Albanese’s October 20 meeting with Trump was locked in, and there have been a series of closed-door talks between companies and officials in the past week.

“By anticipating and responding to the critical minerals requirements of key international partners, and by addressing supply chain barriers, the reserve can be of strategic benefit to Australia,” the brief states.

Critical minerals are crucial to green energy, defence products such as nuclear-powered submarines, car making and powering artificial intelligence data centres. Securing a supply of key elements such as lithium, nickel and vanadium has become a priority of the Trump administration and underpinned its contentious claim to deposit-rich Greenland, as well as its deal-making with Ukraine.

The push to secure critical minerals stems from fears of China’s dominance in the sector – the country produces more than 90 per cent of the world’s processed rare earths – and that it will be used to thwart manufacturing and sovereign capacity in Western nations. Earlier this year, China started blocking exports to the US, causing carmakers to warn that they would need to wind down production.

Concern over the key elements has burst into public view in recent days after Trump reacted furiously to China’s move on Thursday to dramatically expand rare earths export controls, adding five elements to the restrictions.

On Saturday, AEST, Trump posted on Truth Social to say the US would impose a 100 per cent tariff on Chinese goods from November and place export controls on “any and all” critical software sold to China, wiping $4.4 trillion off the US sharemarket.

Trump added that Xi’s move meant “there seems to be no reason” to meet the Chinese leader at scheduled talks at the APEC summit in South Korea at the end of the month, and he called out China’s “extraordinarily aggressive position on trade”.

Details about the Australian critical minerals reserve have been vague amid concerns that Australia lacked the funds to invest in hugely expensive extraction and processing.

Labor has invested billions in companies such as Iluka and Arafura to increase Australia’s rare earths processing capabilities. There is growing anticipation among government officials about projects in Gippsland, Victoria, including the Fingerboards project, which contains terbium required for US defence products.

The departmental brief confirms Australia is exploring “offtake agreements”, in which a government would commit to buying a certain amount of a resource.

The document reveals Labor is considering setting price floors, government loans and guarantees, together with other countries investing directly in Australian projects, in a sign of the government’s focus on defending local companies from heavily subsidised competition from China.

“Australia’s critical minerals processing and refining capabilities are relatively underdeveloped,” the document states. “We do not currently have the depth and breadth of mid- and downstream expertise and technologies as some other countries.

“Are there design features that would enable the reserve to crowd in private investment and financing, and lower risk to the government?”

US ambassador Kevin Rudd has sought to bring Australian miners and US officials together for the best part of two years, attempting to tie Australia into a global supply chain of the elements needed for car making, smartphones and a range of new defence systems.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122368

File: 0b0b7cd25e95a10⋯.mp4 (10.21 MB,404x720,101:180,Clipboard.mp4)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23730599 (130840ZOCT25) Notable: Video: Rogue senator Lidia Thorpe makes threat to ‘burn down parliament’ – Independent senator Lidia Thorpe has sparked outrage after telling a Melbourne rally she would “burn down Parliament House” to make a point about Palestine, later insisting the comment was “a metaphor” for community pain and not a literal threat. The remark came as thousands defied Prime Minister Anthony Albanese’s calls to “turn down the heat” following a Gaza ceasefire announcement. Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke and Tanya Plibersek condemned Thorpe’s words as “unacceptable” and “irresponsible,” while opposition leader in the Senate Michaelia Cash said they were “disgraceful” and warranted action. Jewish leaders also denounced her comments as “dangerous,” warning they inflamed tensions amid ongoing pro-Palestine protests nationwide.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122354

>>122355

Rogue senator Lidia Thorpe makes threat to ‘burn down parliament’

STEPHEN RICE - 13 October 2025

1/3

Labor MPs have joined the chorus of condemnation of rogue senator Lidia Thorpe’s ­incendiary claim that she would “burn down Parliament House” to win justice for Palestine, as anti-­Israel activists toughen their ­rhetoric and pledge to keep marching even in the wake of a Gaza peace deal.

Senator Thorpe’s extraordinary threat came as thousands of pro-Palestine protesters defied Anthony Albanese’s plea to “turn down the heat” and marched across the nation on Sunday, ­despite the announcement of a ceasefire in Gaza, and the imminent release of hostages.

Activists threatened to “take” Brisbane’s Story Bridge next month despite being blocked from marching across it in August to protest the war in Gaza, as a former Greens candidate on Sunday told a Melbourne rally that the Prime Minister was a “treacherous snake” and his senior frontbenchers “butchers”.

In a speech immediately condemned by the federal opposition and Jewish leaders, Senator Thorpe likened the Palestinian struggle to the fight for Indigenous rights in Australia, saying the two causes were bound by history of resistance. “So we stand with you every day, and we will fight every day, and we will turn up every day and if I have to burn down Parliament House to make a point … I am not there to make friends,” she told the crowd.

But almost 24 hours later, the independent Senator said her comment that she’d burn down Parliament for Palestine was a “metaphor” and “clearly a figure of speech” and not a “literal threat”.

“This mock outrage is ridiculous,” she said in a statement on Monday. “My rally remarks were clearly a figure of speech – a metaphor for the pain in our communities and the urgent need to end genocide in Palestine and everywhere. They were obviously not a literal threat.

“While people are dying and starving in Gaza, politicians and media are once again clutching their pearls and chasing a scandal instead of focusing on what really matters. This is just another political game designed to distract from the real issues.

“I have always rejected violence. Any suggestion otherwise misrepresents my long-standing commitment to pursuing justice and self-determination for First Peoples and all oppressed peoples through peaceful, democratic means.”

The opposition said it would “consider options” to hold Senator Thorpe to account.

“Lidia Thorpe’s comments are disgraceful and shocking, but ­unfortunately unsurprising,” Senate opposition leader Michaelia Cash said.

“Australians deserve much better from their elected representatives, but she has a long history of appalling conduct. The opposition will consider options available within the Senate to hold Senator Thorpe accountable and ensure the safety of all those who work in our parliament.”

The Australian sought comment on Sunday from Mr Albanese and Penny Wong, as leader of the government in the Senate, including whether there would be any move to censure Senator Thorpe or refer the remarks to the Australian Federal Police, but was told there would be no further comment.

Instead, a government spokeswoman said that “protest is an ­important part of our democracy, but it also must be respectful of others”. “There is no place for violence, hatred or abuse. After more than two years of conflict, hostages held and a devastating loss of civilian life, the Australian government welcomes the first phase of the plan to bring peace to Gaza,” she said.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122369

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23730606 (130848ZOCT25) Notable: Video: Lidia Thorpe’s protest remarks spark controversy as Israeli hostage release nears – Independent senator Lidia Thorpe has drawn criticism after telling a pro-Palestine rally in Melbourne she would “burn down Parliament House to make a point.” The remark came as about 3500 people marched in support of Palestine ahead of a Gaza ceasefire deal and the expected release of 20 Israeli hostages in exchange for nearly 2000 Palestinian prisoners. Federal opposition Senate leader Michaelia Cash condemned Thorpe’s comments as “disgraceful and shocking,” with the Coalition considering censure options. Jewish community members gathered in Caulfield to mark the pending peace deal, while Indigenous activist Gary Foley warned against “fake Trump bullshit,” and speakers said a ceasefire “does not mean liberation.”

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122354

>>122355

>>122368

Lidia Thorpe’s protest remarks spark controversy as Israeli hostage release nears

Clay Lucas - October 12, 2025

As thousands marched through central Melbourne on Sunday to support Palestine, Victorian senator Lidia Thorpe sparked controversy by declaring she would “burn down Parliament House to make a point” if she had to.

With a Gaza ceasefire deal and the return of the remaining Israeli hostages imminent, 3500 protesters gathered in the city centre, according to Victoria Police.

Hundreds of members of the Jewish community gathered in Caulfield to welcome Monday’s expected peace deal.

Israel is expected to release nearly 2000 Palestinian prisoners – about 250 prisoners in Israeli jails and about 1700 people detained in Gaza since the war began – on Monday in exchange for the 20 remaining hostages taken in the October 7, 2023, Hamas attacks.

Hundreds of thousands of Israelis turned out on the streets of Tel Aviv on Sunday to welcome the hostage deal, as US President Donald Trump prepared to fly to Egypt for a peace ceremony on Monday to be attended by as many as 20 other national leaders.

In Melbourne, the regular Free Palestine rally proceeded with speakers acknowledging that the peace deal was set to bring an end to the current conflict – but most eyed it with suspicion.

Among those to take to the stage was Thorpe, who compared the fate of the Palestinian people in Gaza to that of Indigenous Australians.

“We stand in solidarity because,” she said, “we know what it’s like to have a boot on our neck every moment that we are alive. But we have survived.”

Thorpe said she was willing to go to great lengths to fight for Indigenous and Palestinian people.

“We will fight every day,” she said. “And if I have to burn down Parliament House to make a point ... I am not there to make friends. I’m there to get justice for our people.”

The federal opposition’s Senate leader, Michaelia Cash, later released a statement calling Thorpe’s statements “disgraceful and shocking but unfortunately unsurprising”. Cash said the opposition would “consider options available within the Senate to hold Senator Thorpe accountable”.

A Coalition source said options such as the censure of the independent senator, or a referral to the privileges committee, would be considered.

Also speaking to the thousands of protesters gathered at the State Library in Melbourne on Sunday was Palestinian activist Sarah Baarini, who said that while there had been a ceasefire called by Israel, it “does not mean liberation”.

“A ceasefire does not mean a free Palestine. A ceasefire is only a temporary respite for the Palestinian people, and let’s be honest – Israel cannot be trusted.”

Indigenous activist Gary Foley also spoke – though only briefly, saying “my lungs are f*cked, so I can’t speak for long”.

He urged Australians not to be “fooled by fake Trump bullshit – the fight goes on, the struggle goes on”. He said he wanted to “express the solidarity of the Aboriginal people with our Palestinian brothers and sisters. We stand with you in our mutual struggles for justice and freedom.”

Earlier at Caulfield Park, about 200 members of the Jewish community gathered to celebrate what they hope will be the end of captivity for the remaining hostages held by Hamas since 2023.

Among those to address the crowd was Liberal MP for Caulfield David Southwick, who said he hoped Monday’s hostage return would reduce the level of antisemitism he had seen since October 7, 2023.

“My hope is when the hostages finally come back, that things also go back to the way they were, and we can be finally welcome again – what we have seen as a community should never happen to anybody,” Southwick said. “Everybody should feel welcome, no matter who you are.”

About 1200 people were killed during Hamas’ cross-border assault in 2023, and 251 were abducted.

AP reported last week that Israel’s retaliatory offensive had killed more than 67,000 Palestinians, mostly women and children, according to Gaza’s Health Ministry, which does not say how many of the dead were combatants.

https://www.theage.com.au/politics/federal/lidia-thorpe-s-protest-remarks-spark-controversy-as-israeli-hostage-release-nears-20251011-p5n1sf.html

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9gmv5fqu-9o

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122370

File: 985606952948d5d⋯.mp4 (8.12 MB,640x360,16:9,Clipboard.mp4)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23730614 (130856ZOCT25) Notable: Video: Lidia Thorpe's 'burn down Parliament House' remark faces AFP probe – The Australian Federal Police has launched an investigation into whether independent senator Lidia Thorpe broke any laws by saying she would “burn down Parliament House” to support Palestine. The AFP confirmed its National Security Investigations team in Victoria, led by Commissioner Krissy Barrett, is assessing the remarks for possible breaches of legislation. Thorpe later said her statement was “clearly a figure of speech” and “not a literal threat.” Opposition leader in the Senate Michaelia Cash called the comments “disgraceful,” while ministers Tony Burke and Tanya Plibersek also condemned them as “unacceptable” and “irresponsible.” The AFP said it was acting to “reassure the community” the matter was being handled “appropriately and in a timely manner.”

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122354

>>122355

>>122368

>>122369

Lidia Thorpe's 'burn down Parliament House' remark faces AFP probe

Olivia Caisley - 13 October 2025

The Australian Federal Police has issued a rare statement confirming it is investigating whether independent senator Lidia Thorpe broke any laws by saying she was prepared to "burn down Parliament House" in support of Palestinians.

In a widely condemned speech over the weekend, Senator Thorpe declared she would "burn down Parliament House to make a point" as she compared the struggle of Palestinian people in Gaza to that of Indigenous Australians.

A police spokesperson told the ABC the AFP had called upon its newly established National Security Investigations (NSI) team in Victoria to investigate whether the comments "breach legislation".

"This will be done methodically. It is not the usual practice of the AFP to provide a running commentary on matters. However, noting the public commentary and concern, the AFP is seeking to reassure the community that this issue is being appropriately considered and undertaken in a timely manner," the spokesperson said.

In a separate statement, Senator Thorpe said her remarks were "clearly a figure of speech" and did not amount to "a literal threat".

The NSI teams, set up under new commissioner Krissy Barrett, deal with the blurring lines between extremism, political violence, organised crime and foreign interference, investigating behaviours and offences that do not meet the strictly defined threshold of terrorism.

The opposition said it would "consider options" to hold Senator Thorpe to account.

"Lidia Thorpe's comments are disgraceful and shocking, but unfortunately unsurprising," Senate Opposition Leader and Shadow Foreign Affairs Minister, Michaelia Cash told the ABC.

"Australians deserve much better from their elected representatives, but she has a long history of appalling conduct. The opposition will consider options available within the Senate to hold Senator Thorpe accountable and ensure the safety of all those who work in our parliament."

Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke told ABC RN Senator Thorpe's comment was unacceptable and that if the temperature could be lowered in Gaza, "it should be able to be lowered in Canberra."

"The concept of wanting to inflame, push the temperature up, is not what anyone should be doing, least of all a member of parliament," he said.

Mr Burke, who manages government business in the House of Representatives, did not indicate whether the government would pursue any action against Senator Thorpe in the Upper House.

Social Services Minister Tanya Plibersek also criticised Senator Thorpe's remarks, calling them "absolutely irresponsible".

"We just don't want to give it extra air," Ms Plibersek told Seven's Sunrise.

"We're holding our breaths. We want to see the hostages returned tonight as they're supposed to be.

"We want to see aid back into Gaza and the rebuilding of Gaza, we want to see peace in the Middle East.

"We don't want conflict brought here to Australia."

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-10-13/afp-investigating-lidia-thorpe-burn-down-parliament-house/105885602

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122371

File: f4b97b675871ba9⋯.jpg (115.23 KB,1244x842,622:421,Clipboard.jpg)

File: f58ae232dd289eb⋯.jpg (1.09 MB,4544x3840,71:60,Clipboard.jpg)

File: a1cc1bece42e5f2⋯.jpg (541.03 KB,750x1207,750:1207,Clipboard.jpg)

File: fb42c7274ea9436⋯.jpg (181.19 KB,750x948,125:158,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23730627 (130913ZOCT25) Notable: Prince Andrew told Epstein ‘we are in this together’ – A leaked email has revealed Prince Andrew told Jeffrey Epstein “we are in this together” the day after a photograph surfaced showing him with Virginia Giuffre, undermining his claim to have cut ties with the paedophile financier in 2010. The 2011 message, verified by UK media, shows Andrew expressing concern for Epstein and signing off as “HRH The Duke of York, KG” - a reference to his title as Knight of the Garter, Britain’s oldest and most senior order of chivalry, which he still holds today. Royal experts said the leak is “hugely damning,” describing it as “the point of no return” for Andrew. The disclosure has renewed scrutiny of his relationship with Epstein and its lasting damage to the monarchy’s reputation.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122204

>>122245

>>122346

>>122347

Prince Andrew told Epstein ‘we are in this together’

Neil Johnston and Liz Perkins, The Telegraph - October 13, 2025

1/2

London: Prince Andrew told the late American Jeffrey Epstein they were “in this together” the day after a damning picture of the prince with Virginia Giuffre was published, a leaked email has revealed.

The Duke of York wrote that he was “concerned” about his friend, the paedophile financier, and would “rise above” questions from the press.

The email, obtained by the Mail on Sunday, was sent 12 weeks after Andrew has said he ceased contact with Epstein.

In his disastrous 2019 BBC Newsnight interview, Andrew said he stopped contacting the convicted sex offender in December 2010 after they were pictured in Central Park, New York.

Epstein was convicted in 2008 for procuring a minor for prostitution and was sentenced to 18 months in prison in the United States. He died by suicide in prison in 2019 while awaiting trial on sex-trafficking charges.

Among Epstein’s victims was Giuffre, who lodged a civil lawsuit against Andrew in August 2021. She alleged that she had been trafficked by Epstein to London and raped and abused by the duke on three separate occasions when she was 17.

Andrew reached an out-of-court settlement with Giuffre in 2022, avoiding a jury trial. He paid her an estimated £9 million ($18.4 million) but has always vehemently denied the allegations, insisting that he had no recollection of ever meeting her.

The prince has continued to face questions over his relationship with Epstein and whether he maintained contact with him longer than he has publicly claimed.

The email, dated February 28, 2011, appears to undermine Andrew’s position in the Newsnight interview, when he said he had cut ties “after I was aware that he was under investigation and that was later in 2006 and I wasn’t in touch with him again until 2010”.

The email followed the publication of a photograph in the Mail on Sunday showing Andrew with his arm around Giuffre, then 17, at the London home of Ghislaine Maxwell, the socialite and former girlfriend of Epstein.

At the time, Giuffre said she had suffered sexual abuse at the hands of Epstein for four years. Her introduction to the prince occurred during a six-week trip to Europe.

In the email, reported by The Sun and the Mail on Sunday, Andrew wrote: “I’m just as concerned for you! Don’t worry about me! It would seem we are in this together and will have to rise above it. Otherwise, keep in close touch and we’ll play some more soon!!!!”

He reportedly signed off the message with: “A, HRH The Duke of York, KG.”

KG refers to his title of Knight of the Garter, which he has held since 2006 and still holds.

It is claimed that Epstein’s email address was confirmed through official records, and Andrew’s email address was also verified.

Andrew was forced to withdraw from public life shortly after the Newsnight interview and was stripped of his military titles and charity affiliations by his late mother, Queen Elizabeth II.

However, historians said that his association with Epstein continues to cause reputational damage to the royal Family. Historian A N Wilson described Andrew’s conduct as a “major crisis for the monarchy… perhaps the gravest since the abdication of Edward VIII in 1936”.

Writing in the Mail on Sunday, he added: “The King and the Prince of Wales cannot be seen to support or underwrite Andrew any more.

“His very existence as an official royal is a scandal. So they must cast him out, for if they show him mercy, they are themselves implicated, and we are only a hair’s breadth away from a republic.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122372

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23730669 (130937ZOCT25) Notable: Inside the ABC’s Darkest Secret: The 1975 Pedophile Broadcast – (Video) A 1975 ABC radio interview featuring self-confessed pedophiles has resurfaced amid claims the broadcaster lied to Parliament and continues to suppress the tape. The 42-minute Lateline segment, hosted by Richard Neville, gave a platform to men boasting of grooming and abusing children — behaviour later defended by then-ABC chairman Richard Downing as “something the community ought to know about.” Journalist John Adams says the ABC denied possessing the recording in 2018 but forced him to sign a gag order after retrieving it in 2023. He argues the minister for communications should compel its release under subsection 78(3A) of the ABC Act, calling the episode “a national scandal buried for fifty years.”

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Inside the ABC’s Darkest Secret: The 1975 Pedophile Broadcast

John Adams - 5 SEPTEMBER 2025

In 1975, the ABC aired a disturbing interview where pedophiles boasted about exploiting children. The national broadcaster later suppressed the tape, misled Parliament, and continues shielding itself from accountability today. With acknowledgment to The Richardson Post, where this exposé first appeared.

https://richardsonpost.com/john-adams/40507/the-abcs-darkest-hour-and-its-ongoing-cover-up/

1/2

In July 1975, the ABC broadcasted a radio interview so grotesque, so destructive, that it should have forever been remembered as a cautionary tale in the history of Australian media. Instead, the ABC has buried it, gagged access to it, and - most alarmingly - lied to Parliament about its very existence.

The interview, aired on Lateline on 14 July 1975, gave a national platform to predators who openly boasted about preying on children. The host, Richard Neville, was himself a self-confessed pederast. He and three other adult men, along with a teenager who admitted sexual involvement with older men, spoke for 42 minutes in tones that were flippant, jovial, and chillingly unapologetic.

The men described how they groomed boys with gifts, targeted children from broken families, and loitered near schools to find victims. One participant even admitted to abusing a three-year-old when he was twelve - an admission met not with outrage, but laughter. Another bragged of maintaining sexual relations with up to twelve boys at a time, while others declared that boys as young as twelve were capable of giving “rational consent” to sex with men decades older.

Instead of condemning this depravity, the then-Chairman of the ABC, Richard Downing, defended it, declaring that “in general, men will sleep with young boys and that’s the sort of thing the community ought to know about.”

This was not journalism. It was the normalisation of child exploitation. And it remains a stain on the ABC’s record.

The Gag Order

One might think that in 2025, Australians would be able to hear this recording as part of our collective reckoning with the failures of the past. But they cannot - not because of any court order or police investigation, but because of the ABC itself.

In 2023, I obtained a copy of the recording from the ABC’s archives. But in doing so, I was forced to sign a contract that effectively gagged me from sharing it. The “personal use release form” demanded that the material be kept strictly for private viewing. It explicitly forbade broadcast “by any means, including but not limited to communication via the internet or any social media platform,” and banned inclusion in “publications, sound recordings or media projects.”

In other words, while the ABC still holds the tape in its archives, it has ensured that ordinary Australians cannot listen to it. The public - whose taxes fund the ABC - are denied the chance to hear one of the most shameful episodes in the broadcaster’s history.

When I sought permission to publish excerpts on YouTube, the ABC’s legal department immediately refused. Their justification was simple: the ABC does not license such content for social media distribution. The result is clear: unless the ABC chooses to release the tape itself, Australians remain locked out from their own history.

A Lie to Parliament

As appalling as this censorship is, what is worse is that the ABC misled the Federal Parliament about the tape’s very existence.

In October 2018, former Senator Eric Abetz asked the ABC directly, through the Senate Standing Committee on Environment and Communications, about the 1975 broadcast. The ABC’s written reply was emphatic: “The ABC has no records of the interview.”

That was false.

Five years later, I was able to obtain the very recording the ABC swore it did not possess. The ABC’s 2018 statement was not an error of memory, nor a misplacement in the archives. It was a lie - an institutional deception of the Parliament of Australia.

For a public broadcaster, funded by taxpayers and accountable to Parliament, there can be no greater betrayal. When the ABC lies to the Senate, it lies to the people of Australia.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122373

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23730683 (130943ZOCT25) Notable: Average Aussie defies the ABC in ‘extraordinary action’ and publishes 1975 paedophile broadcast – (Video) Economist and former political adviser John Adams has defied the ABC by uploading a suppressed 1975 Lateline segment featuring self-confessed pederasts to his YouTube channel, 'In the Interests of the People'. The broadcast, long buried by the ABC, included men describing the sexual exploitation of boys as young as 12. Adams obtained the tape in 2023 under a “personal use only” agreement but says he breached it “in the public interest” after the ABC refused release. The ABC condemned the broadcast as “abhorrent and deeply harmful” and said republication was “inappropriate,” while Adams called the move “a circuit breaker against Australia’s culture of concealment.”

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122372

Average Aussie DEFIES the ABC in 'extraordinary action' and publishes revolting controversial segment from 50 years ago that still shocks today

Stephen Gibbs - 13 October 2025

1/2

A self-styled public crusader has defied the ABC by publishing on YouTube an 'abhorrent and deeply harmful' radio segment about paedophiles which had not been broadcast for 50 years.

Economist and former political advisor John Adams had been frustrated the national broadcaster would not allow him to share the audio, which he obtained only for his private viewing.

The segment featured three self-confessed Australian pederasts aged in their 30s as well as a teenager who discussed engaging in sexual activities with much older men.

It was aired on the defunct Lateline program on July 14, 1975 and hosted by the late writer and social commentator Richard Neville.

According to Mr Adams, the Lateline segment - titled 'Pederasty' - included 'several shocking and despicable statements and admissions' and has not been re-broadcast in the past 50 years.

Neville was best known as the co-founder of the counter-culture magazine OZ which was launched in Sydney in 1963, followed by a London version three years later when he was in his mid-20s.

In his 1970 book Power Play, Neville boasted of having a 'hurricane f*ck' with a 'moderately attractive, intelligent, cherubic, fourteen-year-old girl from a nearby London comprehensive school'.

Among the content of the Lateline program was a proposition that Australian boys as young as 12 were able to give rational consent to sexual acts with men aged in their 30s and 40s.

The program also made a distinction between 'paedophilia' as being the sexual assault of a child by a man and 'pederasty' involving a homosexual relationship between a man and a boy.

The pederasts on the panel admitted using bribes to seduce children and loitering around school playgrounds to solicit young boys.

One admitted that as a 12-year-old he had abused a boy aged three, prompting laughter from the others. Another admitted having 12 boys on a sexual roster.

There was discussion about young boys being 'physically delicious' and of seeking those with faces of 'angelic beauty'.

The segment was met with immediate public outrage.

Morals campaigner and former NSW politician Fred Nile provided a tape of the program to police and federal Country Party MP Peter Nixon called for an inquiry.

ABC chairman Richard Downing said at the time the broadcaster's intention was to 'try to inform people about what [is] happening so that they might be forewarned and forearmed'.

He later said, 'In general, men will sleep with young boys and that's the sort of thing the community ought to know about'.

Mr Adams obtained a copy of the recording in July 2023 from the ABC's archives department after signing a personal use release form.

He agreed 'that the above-listed segment shall be used for personal viewing only in a private setting' and would not 'be included in whole or in part in further publications, sound recordings or media projects'.

He further agreed 'that the material shall not be broadcast or communicated to the public by any means, including but not limited to communication via the internet or any social media platform... '.

Mr Adams has now breached that undertaking by broadcasting the segment on his YouTube channel, In the Interests of the People, on Monday at 5pm (AEDT).

In response to Mr Adams's threat to publish the audio, the ABC had said it would 'act to enforce the obligation not to publish this material if our strict terms are not met'.

'It was a mistake by the ABC in 1975 to ever conduct this interview,' an ABC spokeswoman said.

'The interview does not meet the ABC's editorial policies and given the risk of harm to the community it would be inappropriate to republish it.

'The ABC has not authorised the republication or broadcast of the program and given its subject matter we maintain it should not be republished by anyone else.

'The content was accessed via the ABC’s Community Access program under the agreement that it would be used in a private setting only.'

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122374

File: 8224e809e23dfb8⋯.jpg (2.81 MB,3000x2250,4:3,Clipboard.jpg)

File: faa7b0b54d8e3c8⋯.jpg (2.9 MB,3000x2056,375:257,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23735915 (140948ZOCT25) Notable: Australia, US progress missile deal ahead of Albanese’s meeting with Trump – Australia and the United States have advanced a joint missile production partnership, with guided weapons expected to be manufactured in Australia by year’s end under a new agreement with the US Department of War and Lockheed Martin. Defence Industry Minister Pat Conroy said the deal, signed in Washington, would allow co-production of Guided Multiple Launch Rocket System (GMLRS) and precision strike missiles for export through a “US-led global supply chain.” The move comes ahead of Prime Minister Anthony Albanese’s first formal meeting with President Donald Trump, where the AUKUS submarine pact will be central. Conroy said the project demonstrated the strength of the alliance and mutual security priorities.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122177

>>122236

>>122237

>>122320

>>122300

Australia, US progress missile deal ahead of Albanese’s meeting with Trump

Michael Koziol - October 14, 2025

Washington: Australia and the United States have progressed a defence partnership under which Australia is set to begin producing guided missiles, including for export to the US and beyond, by the end of the year.

Defence Industry Minister Pat Conroy, who is in the US to meet Trump administration officials, announced that Australia, the US Department of War and American weapons giant Lockheed Martin had signed a statement of intent and would open an office in Alabama to underpin the project.

The announcement was made days before Prime Minister Anthony Albanese was due to fly to Washington for his first proper face-to-face meeting with President Donald Trump in which the controversial AUKUS submarine pact is expected to be a key topic of discussion.

The statement signed on Monday (Tuesday AEST) paved the way for co-production of critical long-range missiles across the guided multiple launch rocket system (GMLRS) family of munitions and precision strike missiles. Australia was on track to start making GMLRS by Christmas, Conroy said.

“The joint statement also acknowledges that for guided weapons manufacturing in Australia to be viable and sustainable, production quantities would need to extend beyond the demand of the Australian Defence Force,” Conroy said at the Australian embassy in Washington.

The weapons will be available for export to the US, and potentially elsewhere through what Conroy called “the US-led global supply chain”.

Asked if that meant weapons could be exported to US allies such as Israel or Ukraine, Conroy said Australia’s export control regime would still apply, “so we would have to be comfortable with the end user”.

The plan was announced in 2023 as part of efforts to spur ammunition development amid the war in Ukraine and bolster defence industries in both nations.

Conroy said the new statement of intent reaffirmed the strength of the US alliance and the two countries’ mutual interest in contributing to regional security.

Australia is awaiting a Pentagon review of the AUKUS submarine agreement, under which Australia is due to purchase nuclear-powered submarines from the US and later make its own AUKUS-class vessels with the UK.

Key Trump administration officials such as defence undersecretary Elbridge Colby have raised concerns about the deal, which was agreed by Joe Biden and Scott Morrison, although recent reports have suggested the Pentagon’s review will wave it through.

Australia has so far paid about $1.6 billion into the US industrial base to bolster lagging submarine production and is due to pay another $US1 billion ($1.53 billion) by the end of the year.

Conroy said Australia planned to pay the next instalment “shortly”, but would not say if the government would wait for the Pentagon’s review to be released.

“We remain very confident in AUKUS, and we remain very confident AUKUS has utility to all three countries, and we intend to honour our commitments that we made under AUKUS,” he said.

Last month, the Albanese government committed $12 billion to construct the Henderson Defence Precinct in Perth, including graving docks for nuclear submarine maintenance, which will serve the AUKUS agreement.

The government has estimated AUKUS will cost up to $368 billion over 30 years.

https://www.theage.com.au/world/north-america/australia-us-progress-missile-deal-ahead-of-albanese-s-meeting-with-trump-20251014-p5n2cc.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122375

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23735938 (141008ZOCT25) Notable: Video: Government launches $14m ad blitz ahead of under-16s social media ban – The federal government has unveiled a $14 million advertising campaign ahead of the December 10 law banning children under 16 from social media platforms. The ad, airing Sunday, shows teens glued to their phones as a voiceover says the new rules are “for the good of the kids.” Communications Minister Anika Wells said the measure would bring “significant and meaningful difference” and promote cultural change, noting seven in ten teens have seen harmful content online. Platforms including TikTok, X and Facebook must verify users’ ages or face fines up to $49.5 million. Wells said she was confident tech giants “understand their obligations under Australian law.”

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122249

>>122303

>>122304

>>122364

Government releases new social media ban ad in $14m blitz ahead of December 10 prohibition

DUNCAN EVANS - 14 October 2025

The federal government will spend $14m on a huge advertisement blitz ahead of the December 10 start of laws prohibiting teens from accessing social media platforms.

The blitz kicks off on Sunday with a new ad showing young Aussies locked into their phones with a voiceover saying the laws will be “for the good of” the kids.

The ad will roll out across TV, radio, digital and on billboards from Sunday.

“These laws will not mean perfection, but they will mean a significant and meaningful difference,” Communications Minister Anika Wells said on Tuesday morning after meeting with students at the East Doncaster Secondary College in Melbourne.

“And they will spread cultural change across 13-16 year-olds in this country.

“Unfortunately, seven out of 10 young Aussies have seen things online that they shouldn’t have, that has done them harm.

“That stat is too horrifying to ignore and so we have acted.”

The legislation forces tech platforms to verify the age of their users and to refuse access to those below the age of 16.

On Monday, Ms Wells and eSafety Commissioner Julie Inman Grant met with representatives from tech giants, including YouTube and TikTok, to discuss age verification tools and compliance.

“We (the government and the eSafety Commissioner) are in lock-step about this policy, both the imperatives behind it policy-wise, that I govern, and the regulation of it, that Julie Inman Grant, governs,” she said.

“I am confident they understand their obligations under Australian law and they will deliver upon their obligations,” Ms Wells said on Tuesday.

If tech companies fail to comply, they could be hit with fines up to $49.5 million.

The ban ropes in a number of high-profile platforms including X, Facebook, TikTok and Snapchat.

It follows a concerted push from psychologists and parents’ groups concerned about the impacts of social media on childhood development.

At a hearing last year before the passage of the laws, Australian Parents Council vice-president Karen Robertson said “swift and meaningful” reform was needed to give children a “life beyond screens”.

“We’ve lost the power to parent,” she said.

“Tech companies now own our children.”

Ms Wells said there was a “sense of gratitude” from most of the students she met with about the looming ban.

“I think the gratitude is that this law applies to everybody and that everybody will face the same cultural expectation that kids are not to be online on a social media account between the ages 13 and 16,” she said.

She added platforms were obliged to prepare for the December 10 D-Day and to notify teens that their accounts may soon be deactivated.

“My expectation is those things happen in the run up to December 10, not after December 10,” she said.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/breaking-news/government-releases-new-social-media-ban-ad-in-14m-blitz-ahead-of-december-10-prohibition/news-story/9a80d4a328b8477ed39173258acaad1a

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LA9NfWoi3To

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122376

File: 1914356f7f7dbbc⋯.jpg (224.19 KB,1280x720,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23735954 (141018ZOCT25) Notable: Dezi Freeman still at large as Mount Buffalo National Park reopens – Mount Buffalo National Park has reopened nearly two months after closing for the massive police manhunt to capture fugitive Dezi Freeman, wanted over the alleged murders of two police officers. Victoria Police said some areas would remain restricted and patrols would continue as the investigation remains active. More than 800 people have been interviewed, hundreds of properties searched, and 1600 intelligence reports reviewed. Chief Commissioner Mike Bush said detectives were considering “three likely scenarios” — that Freeman is dead, alive in the area, or being sheltered elsewhere. A $1 million reward remains for information leading to his capture.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109588 (pb)

>>122153

>>122185

>>122309

>>122334

Dezi Freeman still at large as Mount Buffalo National Park reopens

MOHAMMAD ALFARES - 14 October 2025

Mount Buffalo National Park will reopen to visitors on Tuesday, nearly two months after it was shut down amid a massive police manhunt for alleged double-murder fugitive Dezi Freeman.

Victoria Police said sections of the park would remain off-limits, with signage and staff patrols in place to enforce restrictions.

The park was closed on August 26 as hundreds of officers, including specialist tactical units and members of the Public Order Response Team, scoured the rugged alpine terrain in one of the state’s largest manhunts ever.

Police were also supported by the Air Wing and interstate resources from across Australia and New Zealand.

Since the search began, investigators have spoken to more than 800 people, including several of Freeman’s associates, and searched hundreds of properties – either with consent or under warrant.

Detectives have also examined more than 1600 pieces of intelligence provided by the public.

Despite the extensive operation, Freeman has not been found. However, police say the progress of the investigation has given them confidence that parts of the national park can now safely reopen.

“The reopening of the park does not signify the end of the search for Freeman, and Victoria Police will continue to maintain a strong presence in the area,” Victoria Police said in a statement.

Police also urged visitors and locals with hunting or trail cameras in the area to review their footage and report anything suspicious.

“With the park reopening, police are urging anyone with hunting or trail cameras to check their footage and share any information that may assist investigators,” a police spokesperson said.

A $1m reward remains on offer for information leading to Freeman’s arrest.

Victoria Police Chief Commissioner Mike Bush on Monday said each piece of evidence had been reviewed twice by detectives.

After announcing his plans to restructure Victoria’s police force, Mr Bush was asked for an update on the search for Freeman, who fled into the bush after allegedly killing officers Vadim de Waart-Hottart and Neal Thompson on August 26.

“Unfortunately, we have no updates of the three likely scenarios. We’re considering what weight we put to each of them. Is he still alive? We don’t know. Is he alive and still in the area? We have no real information to suggest that occurred,” Mr Bush said.

“Has he been able to leave the area and has he been looked after by others? We don’t know.”

The fugitive, who has become Australia’s most hunted man, has been at large for 49 days.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/dezi-freeman-still-at-large-as-mount-buffalo-national-park-reopens/news-story/85aa0e46f056b2d1706b06b337606ccb

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122377

File: 1900452ee1cfe6d⋯.jpg (166.33 KB,1280x720,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: c38dd074cc51ec9⋯.jpg (196.31 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 09de0e730f2258e⋯.jpg (117.45 KB,1080x1439,1080:1439,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23735963 (141026ZOCT25) Notable: Linda Reynolds launches bankruptcy action on Brittany Higgins – Former senator Linda Reynolds has filed Federal Court proceedings to bankrupt Brittany Higgins, after the ex-staffer failed to comply with a creditor’s notice over more than $1 million owed in defamation damages and legal costs. Justice Paul Tottle previously found Ms Higgins defamed Ms Reynolds in social media posts, awarding $340,000 in damages plus about $1.5 million in costs. The move follows similar bankruptcy action against Ms Higgins’s husband, David Sharaz. Higgins, who received a $2.4 million Commonwealth payout in 2022, has since spent most of it on legal fees, taxes and living expenses. Bankruptcy could allow Reynolds to claim part of the couple’s future earnings.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122229

>>122232

>>122270

>>122273

>>122348

Linda Reynolds launches bankruptcy action on Brittany Higgins

PAUL GARVEY - October 13, 2025

Former senator Linda Reynolds has launched Federal Court bankruptcy proceedings against Brittany Higgins, less than two months after her former staffer was ordered to pay her well over $1m in defamation damages and legal expenses.

Ms Reynolds on Monday confirmed she had filed a creditor’s petition in the Federal Court seeking to set in motion the bankruptcy of Ms Higgins, who in February 2021 came forward with allegations that she had been raped in the then-senator’s Parliament House office by colleague Bruce Lehrmann.

The launch of the proceedings against Ms Higgins – just days after similar steps were taken against Ms Higgins’s husband, David Sharaz – shows the challenge ahead of Ms Reynolds as she seeks to collect the sums owed to her as a result of her successful legal claims against the pair.

In a statement, Ms Reynolds confirmed that Ms Higgins had failed to comply with the bankruptcy notice she had issued to her several weeks ago. “It is unfortunate I have to take this step in this long-running saga,” she said.

West Australian Supreme Court judge Paul Tottle in August found Ms Higgins had defamed Ms Reynolds through a series of social media posts, awarding the one-time defence minister $340,000 in damages and in ­interest.

That figure was dwarfed by Justice Tottle’s subsequent costs order, which found Ms Higgins liable for 80 per cent of Ms Rey­nolds’s legal costs. That alone is estimated at around $1.5m.

Ms Higgins was awarded a $2.4m compensation payout from the commonwealth in 2022. While Ms Reynolds has been highly critical of the federal government’s decision to award Ms Higgins that payout, the sum had offered some hope that money could be recoverable in the event she won her defamation action.

A procession of major legal expenses has reportedly all but wiped out that amount.

Around $500,000 of the payout went to taxes and lawyers immediately after the settlement, while the French home purchased by Ms Higgins after the payout was sold at a loss just over a year later. She has also reportedly spent more than $600,000 on her own legal team during her unsuccessful defence against Ms Reynolds’ defamation claim.

Her wedding is estimated to have cost six figures, and the pair has made a number of overseas trips while also renting an apartment on the Gold Coast.

Bankruptcy declarations by Ms Higgins and Mr Sharaz could open a path for Ms Reynolds to secure a portion of both their ­future earnings. Under Aus­tralia’s bankruptcy laws, individuals with one dependent must pay half of their annual after-tax earnings above $87,396.58 to their ­creditors.

Both Ms Higgins and Mr ­Sharaz have been working as ­directors of Sydney public relations firm Third Hemisphere since earlier this year. The couple announced the birth of their first child in March.

It was revealed in Justice ­Tottle’s costs decision in early September that Ms Higgins’s parents had offered to pay the bulk of a $200,000 settlement to Ms Reynolds on the eve of the defamation trial, with Ms Higgins’s lawyers telling Ms Reynolds’s team that the parents “were gravely concerned about their daughter’s wellbeing”.

A criminal prosecution against Mr Lehrmann had to be abandoned after juror mis­conduct. The Federal Court later found that Mr Lehrmann had “on the balance of probabilities” raped Ms Higgins, but Mr Lehrmann is currently appealing that decision.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/legal-affairs/reynolds-launches-bankruptcy-action-on-higgins/news-story/f2a3df47992e93fb90f658fb72c32d97

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122378

File: 0ec346584f97cd9⋯.jpg (188.09 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 90ddfaa0c36c825⋯.jpg (235.35 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: faec6b04b30a00e⋯.jpg (643.73 KB,1241x1755,1241:1755,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23742278 (180822ZOCT25) Notable: High Court backs Tony Burke in Candace Owens visa dispute – The High Court of Australia has upheld Immigration Minister Tony Burke’s decision to deny a visa to US commentator Candace Owens, ruling unanimously that Section 501 of the Migration Act does not breach the Constitution’s implied freedom of political communication. Owens had claimed the refusal was biased and infringed free speech, but the court found Burke acted within his powers to block entry on the grounds her views could “incite discord.” The minister cited her history of inflammatory comments, including claims that Muslims “started slavery” and remarks appearing to downplay the Holocaust. Burke said Owens’ rhetoric risked inflaming racial and religious tensions. The decision reaffirms ministerial discretion to bar foreigners who threaten social cohesion.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

High Court of Australia denies Candace Owens visa appeal against Immigration Minister Tony Burke

DUNCAN EVANS - October 15, 2025

1/2

The High Court of Australia has backed Immigration Minister Tony Burke’s decision to deny a visa to controversial US right-wing firebrand Candace Owens.

Ms Owens, a popular online commentator, was booked to visit Australia in November last year for a commercial speaking tour, but Mr Burke blocked her visa, arguing her controversial views could potentially incite “discord” in society.

Ms Owens launched legal action, arguing his decision had been made with “clear bias and improper motivations”.

On Wednesday, the High Court sided unanimously with Mr Burke.

“Today, the High Court unanimously held that Section 501 ... of the 1958 Migration Act does not infringe the implied freedom of political communication under the Constitution and that the decision of the first defendant (Mr Burke) to refuse the plaintiff (Ms Owens) a visa was not invalid,” the High Court said in its summary of the judgment.

Section 501 of the Act gives the immigration minister the power to deny a foreigner a visa if there is a risk the person would “incite discord in the Australian community or in a segment of that community”.

Mr Burke said Ms Owens’ record of controversial and extreme opinions could do just that.

“From downplaying the impact of the Holocaust with comments about Mengele through to claims that Muslims started slavery, Candace Owens has the capacity to incite discord in almost every direction,” Mr Burke said last year.

“Australia’s national interest is best served when Candace Owens is somewhere else.”

In submissions to the High Court, published in March, Ms Owens’ legal team pitched her dispute with the minister as a free speech battle, arguing section 501 of the Act was invalid because it violated the Constitution’s implied freedom of political communication.

“In the present case, (the section) limits at least two categories of political communication within the scope of the freedom,” the submission reads.

“The first category is political communication by a nonresident, non-citizen who, but for (the section) of the Act, has a lawful right to be issued with a visa that allows that person to enter and remain in Australia for long enough to engage in political communication in Australia.

“The second category is political communication by citizens or lawful residents of Australia that would have occurred in Australia but for the application of (the section)”.

But on Wednesday, the High Court dismissed that argument.

“The Court unanimously held that (the section) does not infringe the implied freedom of political communication,” the summary reads.

Mr Burke’s submissions state the High Court and the Federal Court had long recognised that “the protection of the Australian community” was at the heart of Section 501.

Further, the minister’s legal representatives argued the section did not violate political communication.

“(The section) can impose no burden on political communications by Australian citizens, for the simple reason that they do not require visas,” the submission reads.

“It therefore has no effect at all on a vast amount of political communication.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122379

File: 0a11424124c67f5⋯.jpg (640.31 KB,1920x1280,3:2,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 92e709327f58718⋯.jpg (1.52 MB,1208x2374,604:1187,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23742293 (180835ZOCT25) Notable: Australia to stare down Trump’s threats over new global carbon tax – Australia is set to back a global carbon pricing scheme for international shipping despite threats from the Trump administration to sanction nations supporting the plan. The International Maritime Organisation will vote Thursday on the “net zero framework,” a cap-and-trade system aimed at cutting shipping emissions. US Secretary of State Marco Rubio warned of tariffs, visa bans and port levies on allies that back what Washington calls a “European-led neocolonial export of global climate regulations.” Prime Minister Anthony Albanese’s government, seeking to maintain credibility on clean-energy policy before next week’s Trump meeting, is expected to press ahead alongside Japan, China and the EU. The move risks escalating tensions ahead of the AUKUS and trade discussions.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122175

>>122359

>>122360

>>122361

>>122367

Australia to stare down Trump’s threats over new global carbon tax

Paul Sakkal and Mike Foley - October 15, 2025

1/2

Australia will stare down the Trump administration’s threat to punish nations that back an international pact to impose a carbon price on international shipping, creating another point of division with the United States just days before Anthony Albanese meets Donald Trump next week.

Australian ministers and officials have been nervously weighing options in a series of meetings since the US declared last week that it rejected what it describes as a global carbon tax, saying it would impose sanctions, visa restrictions and port levies on any allies who backed the push.

This masthead has learnt from two sources unable to speak publicly about the sensitive and fluid negotiations that Australia will probably press ahead with support for the scheme. It will be voted on at a meeting of the International Maritime Organisation in London on Thursday, Australian time.

The government would not publicly state its position on Wednesday in response to questions, highlighting the delicate balancing act at play as Labor pursues hard-to-achieve climate targets while Trump shuns green energy.

It is expected to be ratified with the backing of other prominent members of the Paris Agreement such as the European Union, Japan, China, as well as Pacific nations.

The timing is tricky for the prime minister, who is scheduled to meet with Trump on October 20 as he seeks to gain Australia a reprieve from import tariffs imposed by the US on Australian exports, including steel and aluminium.

Known as shipping’s net zero framework, the proposed scheme is a cap and trade system that imposes financial penalties on companies whose ships exceed emissions limits and rewards those that make cuts below the target – enabling them to sell credits to third parties. International shipping emissions are not counted against any nation’s carbon budget, but account for about 3 per cent of global emissions.

US officials were working behind the scenes on Wednesday to move an amendment to the framework that would disallow the scheme from coming into effect unless large shipping nations ratified it domestically, effectively giving it a veto. Australia was not expected to support that amendment.

Australia signalled its support for the scheme when it backed a draft scheme at the International Maritime Organisation, a United Nations agency, in April. Since then, the US has ramped up its opposition with claims that it would raise the cost of shipping by about 10 per cent and hike prices for consumers of imported goods.

Forecasting potential tariffs, visa restrictions or port levies for nations that support “activist-driven climate policies that would burden American consumers”, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio said in a statement on Friday that the US would move to hit Western nations that “sponsor this European-led neocolonial export of global climate regulations”.

“President Trump has made it clear that the United States will not accept any international environmental agreement that unduly or unfairly burdens the United States or harms the interests of the American people.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122380

File: c831bbf0b563d04⋯.jpg (111.49 KB,1280x720,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 5ffb126185bed6f⋯.jpg (238.23 KB,2047x1152,2047:1152,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23742317 (180853ZOCT25) Notable: Australia promises Trump defence revamp, dangles $1b AUKUS carrot – Australia is seeking to ease US pressure over military spending by pledging a major defence overhaul next year and offering a $1 billion AUKUS instalment ahead of Prime Minister Anthony Albanese’s Washington visit. Defence Minister Richard Marles told US officials the National Defence Strategy, due in April, would sketch future spending, while Defence Industry Minister Pat Conroy confirmed another AUKUS payment was imminent. The Trump administration wants allies to lift defence spending to 3 per cent of GDP; Australia currently spends just over 2 per cent of GDP and argues that using broader “NATO-style” accounting — which includes infrastructure, veterans’ costs and logistics — its real outlay already surpasses the UK’s. But analysts say Canberra is “playing for time,” while the government insists its AUKUS commitments demonstrate strategic alignment with US-led Indo-Pacific security.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122300

>>122236

>>122320

>>122367

>>122374

Australia promises Trump a defence revamp, dangles $1b AUKUS carrot before PM’s trip

Paul Sakkal - October 17, 2025

1/2

Australia is countering US pressure to immediately step up military spending by promising Trump officials a defence revamp next year, and by dangling a $1 billion AUKUS payment that could line up with Prime Minister Anthony Albanese’s trip to Washington.

The US has been pressuring European allies and others such as Australia to share the burden of defending Western interests, spurring Australia to make a stream of defence funding announcements on submarine bases, guided weapons and autonomous vessels in the weeks before the meeting with US President Donald Trump.

Albanese heads to the White House next week to meet Trump in a chance to bed down the US-Australia alliance. Upholding the under-review AUKUS pact, and leveraging Australia’s role in supplying the West with critical minerals will be on the agenda.

Australia has a scheduled update of its defence spending, called the National Defence Strategy, due in April next year. Defence Minister Richard Marles said US officials had “absolutely” been made aware that the NDS would be Australia’s next chance to make big new defence investments, potentially easing US anger about Australia’s defence spending.

“The next moment where we are, in a structured way, assessing the needs of our defence force is absolutely NDS,” Marles said in an interview with this masthead. “All of that feeds into next year’s budget.”

The AUKUS submarine deal has been under review in the Pentagon since June. Australian officials believe any major departmental recommendations will not shift White House policy driven by pro-AUKUS figures such as US Vice President J.D. Vance and Secretary of State Marco Rubio.

Under the deal, Australia has been paying instalments to the US to support its domestic submarine capacity, amid fears it is not producing enough submarines to give any to Australia. The US will continue to receive these funds until 2030, when the president of the day must decide if the US can hand over boats.

Defence Industry Minister Pat Conroy, in Washington already to discuss AUKUS, hinted that Labor was on the brink of paying another big sum, which could be presented as a win for Trump when he meets Albanese.

“We’ve made a billion dollars. The plan is to provide another billion dollars shortly,” Conroy said.

Former US ambassador and Liberal senator Arthur Sinodinos said Trump’s advisers would be seeking a commitment of more than just a top-up AUKUS payment.

“I suppose they could do a novelty cheque [for the $1 billion payment], but really it’s a bit beyond those sorts of stunts,” he said.

“They’ll be looking for more, I think, and Australia will be going into the meeting talking about what more we can do on defence and how it will complement what the US is doing in the Indo-Pacific.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122381

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23742320 (180901ZOCT25) Notable: Video: Treasurer lays groundwork for ‘golden’ US minerals deal – Treasurer Jim Chalmers has hailed a potential Australia–US critical minerals agreement as a “golden opportunity” ahead of Prime Minister Anthony Albanese’s meeting with President Donald Trump. Speaking in Washington, Chalmers said the deal could secure tariff relief for Australian exports, which currently face a 10 per cent US duty, and boost joint supply chains amid China’s mineral restrictions. He met senior US officials, including National Economic Council chair Kevin Hassett, to advance the plan, stressing that “Australia’s interests are best served by more trade, not more trade barriers.” The talks also covered AUKUS, with Defence Industry Minister Pat Conroy reporting strong bipartisan support in Washington for the pact’s continuation.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122300

>>122236

>>122320

>>122367

>>122380

Treasurer lays groundwork for 'golden' US minerals deal

Andrew Brown - October 17 2025

Australia's treasurer has touted the "golden opportunity" of a critical minerals deal with the US as he paves the way for a crucial meeting between the prime minister and Donald Trump.

Jim Chalmers held talks with key US officials while in Washington ahead of Anthony Albanese's trip for his first in-person bilateral meeting with the US president.

Australia has been pushing for an agreement on the supply of critical minerals deal with the US in the hope it could be used to lower tariffs imposed by the Trump administration.

"We will make sure that we make the most of this absolutely golden opportunity for Australia, which is critical minerals," Dr Chalmers told reporters in Washington on Friday (AEDT).

"This is a time of great uncertainty, it's a time of great opportunity for Australia. We have so much of what the world wants."

The topic is also set to be raised during one-on-one discussions between the treasurer and US national economic chair Kevin Hassett.

"Clearly, the Americans have an interest in Australian critical minerals," Dr Chalmers said.

"We see this as a huge economic opportunity for Australia and our critical minerals industry."

"Australia's interests are best served by more trade, not by more trade barriers."

Australian exports have been slapped with the lowest tariff rate of 10 per cent by the Trump administration, but officials have been pushing for the total removal of the trade barrier.

The treasurer dismissed concerns a critical minerals deal with the US would come at the expense of thawing relations with China, Australia's largest trading partner.

Mr Trump recently said he would lift tariffs on Chinese exports to the US to 100 per cent in response to plans by Beijing to limit shipments of critical minerals that were essential for tech manufacturing.

"It's well understood here in Washington DC that Australia's put a lot of effort into stabilising that key economic relationship with China," Dr Chalmers said.

"It's also well understood here that we see this economic relationship as one of mutual benefit in the United States."

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122382

File: 2cc8a24d70cd823⋯.jpg (2.4 MB,5060x3373,5060:3373,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 79cb77cebeecd25⋯.jpg (1.32 MB,5554x3703,5554:3703,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 864603f5b83de75⋯.jpg (53.12 KB,600x452,150:113,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23742340 (180915ZOCT25) Notable: Australian miners would link with Department of War in Albanese–Trump deal – Australia and the United States are preparing a critical minerals agreement under which the US Department of War would directly invest in Australian rare earth projects to secure materials for fighter jets and green technologies. The deal, expected to be unveiled during Prime Minister Anthony Albanese’s October 20 meeting with President Donald Trump, follows Trump’s $US100 billion funding law for minerals supply diversification. Defence Industry Minister Pat Conroy said the long-awaited AUKUS review could be “imminent,” while Treasurer Jim Chalmers emphasised Australia’s role in balancing trade ties with China and the US. Beijing, defending its export curbs, denied weaponising minerals. Albanese will depart for Washington on Sunday.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122300

>>122320

>>122367

>>122380

>>122381

Australian miners would link with Department of War in Albanese-Trump deal

Paul Sakkal and Michael Koziol - October 17, 2025

The US Department of War would invest directly in Australian critical minerals projects to source rare earths needed for American fighter jets under a mooted deal that has forced Labor to quell fears of taking the US’s side in any potential trade war with China.

The minerals indispensable for green energy, defence and smartphone technology will be a focus of Prime Minister Anthony Albanese’s meeting with US President Donald Trump on October 20, as will the AUKUS pact, which is under review.

Defence Industry Minister Pat Conroy on Friday appeared to give the most confident prediction on the timing of the AUKUS review’s completion, saying it might be “imminent”. Conroy said he was citing Defence Minister Richard Marles, but Marles has not used such language. Australian officials have received mixed messages from US counterparts about whether the probe would be completed by the time of the Trump-Albanese meeting.

Ministers and officials are coy about the details of the highly anticipated minerals deal with the US even though it has been months in the planning and is likely to be announced next week.

In meetings with miners this month, Australian officials have canvassed the prospect of direct investment from the US Department of War, previously called the defence department. According to industry sources unauthorised to speak publicly, officials have discussed the creation of similar models to the Mountain Pass rare earth facility in California backed by a Department of War loan facility.

Intent on finding minerals from nations outside China, Trump’s One Big Beautiful Bill, passed in July, opened up $US100 billion ($155 billion) in available loan funds specifically for critical minerals and related industries. Australia has a plentiful supply of key rare earths such as dysprosium and terbium used in advanced defence technology like F-35 jets. Each plane requires 415 kilograms of critical minerals.

“We know that American companies desperately need critical minerals, and Australia is very well placed to service that need,” Treasurer Jim Chalmers said from the US on Friday.

“No doubt it will be part of the discussions that Prime Minister Albanese has with President Trump next week.”

Australia’s unique supply of sought-after minerals gives Albanese leverage going into the White House meeting.

For months, debate around the US-Australian alliance centred on the US demands of Australia to spend more than 3 per cent of GDP – equating to tens of billions of dollars each year – on defence. But the salience of critical minerals has skyrocketed as China has limited exports to the world, threatening the sovereign manufacturing capacity of the US and other competitors.

China’s move has sparked a 100 per cent tariff threat from Trump, causing havoc in global sharemarkets and creating the spectre of a trade war between Australia’s major security ally and its biggest trading partner.

US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent this week said Western nations should “decouple” from China, a notion quickly shut down by Chalmers, who met Bessent this week as he spruiks Australia’s economic relationship with the US.

“I think it’s well understood here in Washington, DC, that Australia’s put a lot of effort into stabilising that key economic relationship with China,” Chalmers said.

“The views that Secretary Bessent expressed is not the first time they’ve expressed views of that nature.

“Australia’s interests are best served by more trade, not by more trade barriers.”

A spokesman for China’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Lin Jian, pushed back on Bessent’s claim in a press conference on Thursday.

“China’s export control measures are consistent with international practice and are taken to better safeguard world peace and regional stability, and to fulfil China’s non-proliferation and other international obligations,” he said.

Conroy talked up the AUKUS pact on Friday.

“At a congressional level, I was meeting with senior leaders in Congress who were evangelical about the importance of AUKUS, who expressed real confidence that it would continue, and I also met with real positivity in my engagement at the Pentagon on the same issue,” he said.

The prime minister will depart for the US on Sunday. He is due to meet with Trump in the Oval Office most likely early on Tuesday morning Australian time.

https://www.theage.com.au/politics/federal/australian-miners-would-link-with-department-of-war-in-albanese-trump-deal-20251017-p5n3bb.html

https://www.fmprc.gov.cn/mfa_eng/xw/fyrbt/lxjzh/202510/t20251016_11734774.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122383

File: 0b56481ef588312⋯.mp4 (15.34 MB,640x360,16:9,Clipboard.mp4)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23742360 (180935ZOCT25) Notable: ‘China v the world’: US calls on Australia in rare earths fight with Beijing – (Video) US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has urged Australia and other allies to unite against China’s sweeping new export controls on rare earth minerals, declaring it “China versus the world.” Bessent said Beijing’s plan to require global approval for products containing even trace amounts of Chinese-sourced minerals was an unacceptable bid to control supply chains worldwide. He warned that Western nations “have lots of levers we can pull for products China needs that could be equally damaging,” pledging “a fulsome, coordinated response” from the US, Europe, Australia, Canada and Asian democracies. “Bureaucrats in China cannot manage the supply chain or manufacturing process for the rest of the world,” he said.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122300

>>122359

>>122360

>>122367

>>122382

‘China v the world’: US calls on Australia in rare earths fight with Beijing

Michael Koziol - October 16, 2025

1/2

Washington: Treasurer Jim Chalmers will be asked to join a US-led fight against China’s latest attempts to increase its stranglehold over the world’s critical minerals as he arrives in Washington for a financial summit days before Anthony Albanese meets with Donald Trump.

US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said the US and its allies, including Australia, would present a “fulsome response” to Beijing’s plan to expand controls over rare earths, including the sweeping new requirement for companies worldwide to seek approval to export products containing even small traces of minerals sourced from China.

“This is China versus the world. It’s not a US-China problem,” Bessent said at a Washington event hosted by television network CNBC.

“We’re going to be speaking with our European allies, with Australia, with Canada, with India and the Asian democracies, and we’re going to have a fulsome group response to this because bureaucrats in China cannot manage the supply chain or the manufacturing process for the rest of the world.

“We have lots of levers that we can pull for products that they [China] need that could be equally damaging. We’re going to assert sovereignty; so are the Western allies.”

Acting Prime Minister Richard Marles said the feud between China and the US created an opportunity for Australia’s economy and industry, but pushed back against any notion of decoupling from its biggest trading partner.

“It’s why we think there’s a real opportunity for Australia to be in this sector – in the downstream processing of critical minerals. I think that’s going to be in the interests of many countries around the world, in fact, the globe in general, to have more sources of refinement,” he said on ABC TV.

Bessent noted his counterparts were in town for a World Bank and International Monetary Fund summit this week. That includes Chalmers, who is due to meet Trump’s National Economic Council director Kevin Hassett, and global investors in New York, among others.

At a separate news conference in Washington, US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer also referred to Australia, noting it had been the victim of retaliatory trade actions by China, along with the US, Europe and Canada.

The new Chinese controls, if enacted, would mean that “if a smartphone is made in Korea and sold to Australia, then the company would first need to get China’s approval, since the phone contains semiconductors which may contain rare earths sourced from China”.

“Obviously, neither we nor our allies are going to go along with that kind of system,” Greer said. “It’s a clear repudiation of everything we’ve been working toward for the last six months.

“The United States won’t stand for it ... [But] this is not just about the United States. China’s announcement is nothing more than a global supply chain power grab.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122384

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23742370 (180949ZOCT25) Notable: Video: Ceasefire called on Sunday pro-Palestine protests – Melbourne’s Free Palestine Coalition has announced it will suspend its weekly rallies following the Gaza ceasefire between Israel and Hamas, ending two years of mass demonstrations outside the State Library of Victoria. Spokesperson Mai Saif said the protests were “suspended for now,” though larger national actions for “justice and liberation” would continue. Lord Mayor Nick Reece and Victoria Police welcomed the decision, calling it a “relief” for the city after 25,000 police shifts were used to maintain order. Jewish community leaders said the pause would help rebuild social trust and allow Jewish Melburnians to feel safe again. A smaller anti-racism protest remains scheduled for Sunday, with police treating it as a routine event.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122354

>>122355

>>122369

Ceasefire called on Sunday pro-Palestine protests

Chip Le Grand and Kieran Rooney - October 16, 2025

1/2

After two years of anti-war protests, calm could return to the centre of Melbourne as early as this Sunday.

The lead organiser of the demonstrations staged outside the State Library of Victoria every Sunday, the Free Palestine Coalition, announced on social media that following the ceasefire agreement between Israel and Hamas, it would pause the protests.

Mai Saif, a spokesperson for another organising group, Free Palestine Melbourne, confirmed the decision was supported by the broader pro-Palestinian movement.

“It is suspended for now,” she said. “At this stage, the weekly, regular rallies every Sunday won’t be going ahead.”

In a social media post, the rally organising committee said protests had been set to continue until there was a ceasefire in Gaza. Hamas and Israel agreed to a ceasefire deal on October 10.

The news was cautiously welcomed by Melbourne Lord Mayor Nick Reece, who earlier this week urged the protests to stop.

“If we can achieve peace in the Middle East surely we can have peace on the streets of Melbourne again,” Reece said on Thursday.

“After two years of disruption, it is time for Melbourne to get some relief. Visitors can come to our city knowing they can enjoy our beautiful restaurants, galleries, theatres and shows without having to skirt a protest and deal with all the disruption that comes from that.”

Committee for Melbourne chief executive Scott Veenker said reducing the regular disruption in the heart of the city would have an immediate positive effect.

“It will mean businesses can trade more easily, residents can enjoy their city, and visitors can experience Melbourne at its best. It should give everyone the space to reconnect with the CBD and help reinforce Melbourne’s standing as an open, welcoming and globally admired city.”

The protest pause will also provide relief to Victoria Police, who since October 2023 have dedicated 25,000 shifts to maintaining public order at the rallies. Chief Commissioner Mike Bush said at the start of this week that this was not the best use of limited police resources.

“They have empathy and compassion for whatever their cause may be – not for us to judge,” Bush said of the protesters. “But what I ask is that they also have empathy and compassion for the people of Melbourne. If I took half of those 25,000 shifts and dedicated them to prevention, we’d have less crime.”

Police have been promised additional powers to deal with the protests, including a ban on face coverings at demonstrations. The Allan government resisted pressure to introduce a NSW-style permit system to regulate protests.

A pro-Palestinian protest in Melbourne was held within days of Hamas’ October 7, 2023, atrocities, in which 1200 Israelis were murdered and 250 taken hostage. The protests have continued nearly every Sunday throughout a war which, according to Gazan health authorities, has killed more than 67,000 Palestinians. At their peak, the protests attracted more than 10,000 people.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122385

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23742390 (181003ZOCT25) Notable: Video: Pro-Palestine activists win protest law challenge in Supreme Court – Pro-Palestine activists in Sydney have overturned major parts of New South Wales protest laws, with the Supreme Court ruling that restrictions on assemblies near places of worship “impermissibly burdened” the implied constitutional freedom of political communication. Justice Anna Mitchelmore found the six-month-old law “not necessary,” saying existing Crimes Act amendments already addressed harassment and obstruction. Premier Chris Minns said the ruling “does not mean there is free rein” outside worship sites. Palestine Action Group organiser Josh Lees accused Mr Minns of “cooking the books” and “manufacturing a supposed anti-Semitism crisis” to justify “an outrageous overreach” that he said weaponised public fear against the pro-Palestine movement.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109477 (pb)

>>122354

>>122355

>>122369

>>122384

Pro-Palestine activists win protest law challenge in Supreme Court

JAMES DOWLING - October 16, 2025

1/2

Sydney’s most prolific pro-Palestine protesters have forced the state government to roll back controversial protest laws through a constitutional challenge, declaring victory against a “whipped up and manipulated” anti-Semitism crisis.

The Palestine Action Group On Thursday successfully tore down amendments to protest laws that restricted assembly near places of worship, which they argued were an “outrageous overreach” and could prevent demonstrations entirely unrelated to the religious institutions affected.

Supreme Court judge Anna Mitchelmore ruled the six-month-old law “impermissibly burdens the implied constitutional freedom of communication on government or political matters and is invalid”, sending NSW Premier Chris Minns back to the drawing board.

“While it is disappointing it is important to note that this does not mean there is free rein outside places of worship,” Mr Minns said.

“Although the Supreme Court has determined that a police power to ‘move on’ persons engaging in obstructing, harassing and other conduct as part of a public assembly outside places of worship is invalid, the decision has no impact on the offence introduced recently in the NSW government’s places of worship laws that make it a crime to impede, harass, intimidate or threaten a person accessing a place of worship.

“These laws were designed to strike the right balance between community protection and the freedom of political expression.”

Justice Mitchelmore in her judgment argued the protest laws were “not necessary” because amendments to the Crimes Act passed at the same time achieved the same purpose without infringing on protesters. Those laws remain in place and were not subject to challenge in the courts.

PAG organiser Josh Lees — who also led the protest group’s successful Supreme Court case for the Sydney Harbour Bridge March for Humanity — has repeatedly insinuated that Mr Minns passed February’s protest laws under a veil of manufactured fear, using the Dural Caravan terror hoax as a false pretence.

“We said from the beginning that what Chris Minns was doing was an outrageous overreach in trying to find some new way to ban protests in NSW … Minns passed these laws on the basis of a pack of lies,” Mr Lees said outside court.

“These laws were about targeting anyone who protested near a place of worship, even if (the protest) had nothing to do with that place of worship or those worshippers.

“Obviously, anti-Semitism does exist, and it is a problem and we’re against it, but the idea that protests are the cause of that is ludicrous.”

When the protest laws first passed in February, news had broken less than a month before of a caravan found in Dural loaded with mining explosives alongside a note listing synagogues to be targeted.

By the time it was revealed to be a criminal “con job” leveraged by organised crime figures to influence other police negotiations, the new laws had already passed.

The PAG cried foul, questioning whether Mr Minns and Police Minister Yasmin Catley were aware the caravan threat and other linked anti-Semitic vandalism attacks were not motivated by racial hatred, and had misled the public in suggesting otherwise.

The laws were also subject to an upper house inquiry that controversially threatened to seek arrest warrants for political staffers.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122386

File: 27b16d74ae44b6e⋯.jpg (150.01 KB,1280x720,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23742443 (181108ZOCT25) Notable: Barnaby Joyce won’t run for New England, mulls One Nation move after talks with Pauline Hanson – Former Nationals leader Barnaby Joyce has announced he will not recontest his New England seat, citing a relationship with party leadership that has “irreparably broken down”. Pauline Hanson, who opened a new One Nation branch in Tamworth, invited him to “come across to One Nation”, saying he was “more aligned” with her party than the Nationals. Mr Joyce, recently treated for prostate cancer, said net zero policies had “hurt” his electorate and made remaining in the Nationals “untenable”. He is now weighing his political future after discussions with Senator Hanson amid ongoing Coalition fractures.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122218

>>122332

Barnaby Joyce won’t run for New England, mulls One Nation move after talks with Pauline Hanson

SARAH ISON - 18 October 2025

1/2

Former Nationals leader Barnaby Joyce has announced he will not run for the seat of New England in the next election, saying his relationship with party leadership has broken down “like a sadness in some marriages”.

It comes as Pauline Hanson visited Tamworth on Saturday to open a New England branch of One Nation amid fuelling speculation Mr Joyce will defect to her party and succeed her.

“He’s been shut down by the National Party. They put him on the backbench, out of the way,” Senator Hanson told Nine News, adding that Mr Joyce was “more aligned with One Nation than what he is with the National Party”.

“Barnaby...I’ll open the doors for your, come across to One Nation,” she said.

Mr Joyce released a statement on Saturday confirming the shock move, amid unconfirmed reports he was possibly planning to defect to One Nation.

“My relationship with the leadership of the Nationals in Canberra has unfortunately, like a sadness in some marriages, irreparably broken down,” Mr Joyce said in the statement.

“I will not be standing for New England again but will complete my term as promised at the last election.”

The veteran MP said he would have preferred more time to contemplate the decision, but felt forced to make his intentions known after the news broke.

“The instructions that during the federal election I was not to campaign outside New England as that did not represent the views of the Nationals, then after the election being moved on for “generational change” and just the atmospherics in the party room, where I am seated in the far corner of the Coalition in the chamber, means I am seen and now turning into a discordant note,” he said.

“That is not who I want to be.

“More importantly our position in continuing to support net zero with the massive schism and hurt to my electorate, to small businesses, to the environment, to the poor, to the defence of Australia and creating hate between lifelong friends in my community makes continuing in the Nationals’ party room in Canberra under this policy untenable.

“I will leave with the greatest of love for all and money in the electorate bank account.”

Mr Joyce said he was now free to consider all his options on what to do next.

“I hope that the members understand the unfortunate position I am in and the obvious action after a period of consideration I must take,” he said.

“I wished I had been given more time to consider this and don’t know the motives of those who put the story out there.

“I am so desperately sorry as to the hurt this may cause and close with the deepest of affection for you all.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122387

File: 7d639fc32150891⋯.jpg (314.33 KB,2047x1152,2047:1152,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 20012b42a26aec8⋯.jpg (236.69 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23742454 (181117ZOCT25) Notable: PNG troops face going hungry amid unpaid catering bill, in challenge for Pukpuk ally Australia – Papua New Guinea’s Defence Force faces a shutdown in food services for its 3500 troops after failing to pay a $6.2m catering bill dating back to March, underscoring the fragility of its military under the new Pukpuk (Crocodile) Treaty with Australia. Contractor iPi Catering has warned it will halt operations, while NKW Holdings — previously accused of inflating Manus Island invoices — assumes part of the contract. PNG Defence Minister Billy Joseph and Australian counterpart Richard Marles declined comment. Analysts warn PNG’s Defence Force is in a “woeful state,” battling debt, disrepair, and missing weapons, posing a challenge for Australia’s regional security commitments.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122272

>>122330

>>122339

>>122340

>>122344

PNG troops face going hungry amid unpaid catering bill, in challenge for ‘Pukpuk’ ally Australia

BEN PACKHAM - October 15, 2025

1/2

Australia’s soon-to-be-ally Papua New Guinea faces a shutdown in food services for its 3500-strong defence force over an unpaid $6.2m catering bill dating back to March.

The debt to its longtime catering company comes as the PNG Defence Force hands a new contract to feed about a third of its troops to another company, NKW Holdings Ltd, which charged Australian taxpayers nearly $1400 per person per day to feed and house asylum seekers on Manus Island during the so-called “PNG Solution”.

The current contractor, iPi Catering Ltd, has warned it will have to halt services in coming weeks, after a shutdown in April and May over an earlier unpaid bill left it unable to pay its suppliers.

Late payments by the PNG government have also caused periodic shutdowns of electricity, gas and water services at PNGDF bases.

PNG’s inability to meet its Defence Force’s most basic needs highlights the challenges Australia faces under the newly-signed Pukpuk (Crocodile) Treaty, which promises to improve the PNGDF’s capabilities and integrate it with the Australian Defence Force.

PNG Defence Minister Billy Joseph and his Australian counterpart Richard Marles declined to answer questions about the unpaid catering bill, or whether Australia would be asked to chip in.

Just a week ago, Mr Joseph told his Facebook followers that Australia was providing 4500 sets of uniforms and boots to PNGDF.

“As allies, the effort to improve PNGDF capabilities to the same standards as the ADF begins,” he said.

Anthony Albanese and his PNG counterpart James Marape signed the landmark treaty last week, requiring each country to “act to meet the common danger” if either faces an armed attack.

Mr Marape, who wants to double the size of the PNGDF to 7000, has said the yet-to-be-ratified treaty will help to modernise the force, strengthening its capabilities “across all domains”. He said this included establishing special forces and a new air military wing.

It is unclear how the new capabilities will be paid for.

In April, before the PNGDF cleared its previous debt to iPi, its top commander, Rear Admiral Philip Polewara said he had asked the country’s Treasury to come up with the outstanding money.

“Hopefully, they might top up something so that we can offset our debt with the catering company,” Admiral Polewara told PNG’s Post Courier newspaper.

It is understood IPi will retain about two-thirds of the PNGDF’s catering work, while NKW will take over services for four bases in PNG’s southern region, including three in and around Port Moresby, from March next year.

PNGDF Deputy Chief Brigadier General Opa Lari told the PNG Bulletin the decision to engage NKW was due to “challenges” with iPi.

“This was one of the reasons why we left out iPi Group, but when they are ready, we will sign a contract with them also,” he said.

NKW, a landowner company based in Morobe Province, was paid more than $136m by Australia to manage asylum-seeker camps in Manus from October 2017 until November 2019.

This included an $82m contract handed to the company by the Department of Homes Affairs without a tender process, to provide food and resident services for 209 refugees for 282 days – a per-person rate of $1390-a-day.

NKW was accused of inflating invoices and subsequently repaid about $5m, according to an Auditor-General’s report.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122388

File: c4e7320e1ed3e93⋯.jpg (3.8 MB,3000x2000,3:2,Clipboard.jpg)

File: d7d36f081cd2b4c⋯.jpg (4.29 MB,3000x2000,3:2,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23742478 (181141ZOCT25) Notable: Ex-Trump national security adviser Bolton charged over handling of classified material – Former US national security adviser John Bolton has been charged with 18 counts under the Espionage Act for allegedly retaining and sharing top-secret records, including diary-like notes about his time in government. Prosecutors say Bolton shared over 1000 pages of classified information with relatives and failed to disclose that Iranian-linked hackers accessed his emails. He denies wrongdoing, calling the case an “intensive effort” by Donald Trump to “intimidate his opponents.” The charges carry potential sentences of up to 10 years per count and follow similar indictments against other Trump critics, deepening concern over politicisation of the Justice Department.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109347 (pb)

>>109544 (pb)

>>122159

>>122305

Ex-Trump national security adviser Bolton charged over handling of classified material

Eric Tucker - October 17, 2025

1/2

Washington: John Bolton, a former national security adviser to US President Donald Trump, has been charged with storing top-secret records at home and sharing with relatives diary-like notes about his time in government that contained classified information.

Bolton is accused of sharing more than 1000 pages of information about government activities with relatives, the 18-count indictment says.

Bolton’s indictment marks the third time in recent weeks the Justice Department has secured criminal charges against one of Trump’s critics.

In a defiant statement, Bolton denied the charges and called them part of an “intensive effort” by Trump to “intimidate his opponents”.

“Now, I have become the latest target in weaponising the Justice Department to charge those he deems to be his enemies with charges that were declined before or distort the facts,” he said.

The indictment against Bolton also suggests classified information was exposed when operatives believed to be linked to the Iranian regime hacked his email account in 2021 and gained access to secrets he had shared. Prosecutors say that a representative for Bolton told the FBI that his emails were hacked, but that he didn’t reveal that he had shared classified information through the account or that the hackers now had possession of this information.

The indictment, filed in a federal court in Maryland, charges Bolton with eight counts of transmission of national defence information and 10 counts of retention of national defence information, all in violation of the Espionage Act.

Each count is punishable by up to 10 years in prison if Bolton is convicted, but any sentence would be determined by a judge based on a range of factors. Bolton’s lawyers have previously denied he engaged in wrongdoing, and a lawyer said his client “did not unlawfully share or store any information”.

“These charges stem from portions of ... Bolton’s personal diaries over his 45-year career – records that are unclassified, shared only with his immediate family, and known to the FBI as far back as 2021,” lawyer Abbe Lowell said in a statement. “Like many public officials throughout history … Bolton kept diaries – that is not a crime.”

The investigation into Bolton, who served for more than a year in Trump’s first administration before being fired in 2019, burst into public view in August when the FBI searched his home in Maryland and his office in Washington for classified records he may have held on to from his years in government.

Those raids were seeking evidence of possible violations of the Espionage Act, which makes it a crime to remove, retain or transmit national defence records, according to partially unsealed search warrants filed in federal court.

In Bolton’s Maryland home, agents seized two mobile phones, documents in folders labelled “Trump I-IV” and a binder labelled “statements and reflections to Allied Strikes”, according to court documents.

They also found records labelled “confidential”, including documents that referenced weapons of mass destruction, the US mission to the United Nations, and other materials related to the US government’s strategic communications inside his office in Washington, DC, according to court records.

Court records also show that a foreign entity hacked Bolton’s email account, though details of the hack are redacted. Bolton’s lawyer has previously said that the records the FBI seized were ordinary documents for a former government official to possess.

Trump himself was previously indicted on Espionage Act violations for allegedly transporting classified records to his Florida home after departing the White House in 2021 and refusing repeated requests by the government to return them. Trump had pleaded not guilty, and that case was dropped after he won re-election in November 2024.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122389

File: 9bcfc1c013994d9⋯.jpg (438.93 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23742497 (181158ZOCT25) Notable: Flight risk fears after bail for ‘China spy’ – An alleged Chinese spy has been granted bail by an ACT magistrate despite prosecutors warning she could flee Australia using a new passport from Beijing. The woman, accused of reckless foreign interference for allegedly gathering information on Canberra’s Guan Yin Citta Buddhist Association, was released on a $633,000 surety under strict conditions including daily police reporting, a ban on encrypted apps and a 200m exclusion zone around Chinese diplomatic premises. Magistrate Jane Campbell said she “did not have a crystal ball” but found the risk of flight or witness interference insufficient to deny bail. Prosecutors cited “unexplained wealth,” embassy contact and family links to China’s Public Security Bureau.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109483 (pb)

>>109486 (pb)

>>109514 (pb)

>>109525 (pb)

>>122183

Flight risk fears after bail for ‘China spy’

BEN PACKHAM - October 17, 2025

1/2

An alleged Chinese spy has been granted bail by an ACT magistrate, who acknowledged there was still an outside risk she might flee the country.

Prosecutors argued the woman, who has significant “unexplained wealth” and a China-based husband who works for the country’s Public Security Bureau, could have a fresh passport issued by Beijing allowing her to abscond.

Magistrate Jane Campbell said she did not have a “crystal ball” to assure her the woman would remain in Australia, and accepted she had the financial means and the Chinese connections to escape the country.

But she said the likelihood that she would abscond or interfere with witnesses was not sufficient to deny her liberty.

“I am not satisfied that … the defendant’s entitlement to bail could be justifiably refused, and therefore I will grant bail,” Ms Campbell said.

The woman, who has been given a male pseudonym “Thomas Tyler”, is a Chinese citizen who has been a resident of Australia since 2006. She is accused of reckless foreign interference, which carries a maximum 15-year term, over ­allegations she gathered information on Canberra’s Guan Yin Citta Buddhist Association for China’s Public Security Bureau.

Ms Campbell released the woman on a $633,000 surety, ­ordering her not to approach the Chinese embassy or consulates, and stay at least 200m away from all known premises owned or ­operated by the Buddhist sect.

She was banned from contacting any Chinese officials other than her husband, who she was said to be in the process of divorcing and was allowed to communicate with through a lawyer. The woman was directed not to leave the ACT, to reside at her usual ­address, and to report to police between 2pm and 5pm each day. She was also banned from possessing more than one phone, and having any encrypted communications apps. The woman, who is alleged to have begun working for her Chinese handler in 2022, has indicated she will plead not guilty.

The court heard on Friday the woman had $230,000 in unexplained funds in her accounts – the result of “numerous large deposits from Chinese based financial institutions”. Her assets, including three properties, a $400,000 Bentley car, two Mini Cooper vehicles, designer clothes and luxury handbags to the value of $30,000, were inconsistent with her stated taxable income, the prosecution said.

Counsel for the Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions said the woman had contacted the Chinese embassy in Canberra after a search warrant was executed at her property but before she was arrested in August.

He said Ms Campbell was entitled to infer the embassy visit was “to seek assistance in relation to fleeing jurisdiction”.

The prosecution also revealed that when she was arrested, there were five suitcases in her lounge room. Her lawyer, Anthony Williamson SC, said this was because officers had “ripped the place apart” in their search, an assertion rejected by the prosecution.

Ms Campbell said any foreign national was entitled to seek ­assistance from their embassy, and “there is nothing to suggest (the suitcases) were packed with an ­intention to abscond”.

She also downplayed suggestions the woman’s frequent visits to China, averaging 48 days a year, made her a greater flight risk, saying such travel was consistent with someone who had family and business connections in the country.

The prosecution argued there was also a “significant risk” the woman would “endanger” and ­“interfere” with witnesses in the case if she was granted bail.

But the magistrate discounted the concern, saying on the evidence available to her, the woman had not provided the identities of any of the members of the Buddhist group to her Chinese handler.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122390

File: 35515a39d57b053⋯.mp4 (14.44 MB,360x640,9:16,Clipboard.mp4)

File: d6ba732e8db48e7⋯.jpg (858.95 KB,2048x1228,512:307,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 0e9239ff982b8f4⋯.jpg (477.17 KB,1140x760,3:2,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23742543 (181229ZOCT25) Notable: Video: Former US Marine pilot who trained Chinese flyers appeals extradition from Australia – Former US Marine pilot Daniel Duggan has appealed his extradition to the United States, arguing in the Federal Court in Canberra that his alleged conduct was not a crime under Australian law at the time. Duggan, 57, faces US charges of violating arms control laws by training Chinese military pilots to land on aircraft carriers. His lawyer, Christopher Parkin, called the case “uncharted territory”, citing the dual-criminality requirement. Prosecutor Trent Glover argued nothing in law barred extradition, saying Duggan’s offences clearly met treaty conditions. Duggan’s wife, Saffrine, said her husband was being used as a “pawn in an ideological war” between the US and China and pleaded for his release.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109359 (pb)

>>109360 (pb)

Former US Marine pilot who trained Chinese flyers appeals extradition from Australia

straitstimes.com - Oct 16, 2025

CANBERRA - Former U.S. Marine Corps pilot Daniel Duggan appealed in an Australian court on Thursday against extradition to the United States on charges of violating U.S. arms control laws in relation to China, with his lawyer arguing that his conduct was not an offence in Australia at the time.

In December 2024, Australia's then attorney-general Mark Dreyfus approved a United States extradition request for Duggan, who faces U.S. charges including that he trained Chinese military pilots to land on aircraft carriers.

Duggan, 57, a naturalised Australian citizen, was arrested by Australian Federal Police in a rural town in the state of New South Wales in October 2022, shortly after returning from China, where he had lived since 2014.

Duggan appeared in the federal court in Canberra on Thursday, clean-shaven in a dark blue suit.

He sat erect in his seat as he followed the proceedings with a pen and documents on his lap but did not speak until after the arguments had been heard, when he thanked the judge for allowing him to attend and "see justice done".

DUGGAN'S LAWYER SAYS EXTRADITION IS 'UNCHARTERED TERRITORY'

His lawyer Christopher Parkin told the court the extradition was "uncharted territory" for Australia, arguing that Duggan's conduct was not an offence in Australia at the time or when the U.S. requested extradition and so did not meet the requirement for dual criminality in Australia's extradition treaty with the United States.

"This is a fairly extraordinary case," Parkin said.

"The offences must be punishable under the laws of both parties at the time when the relevant conduct occurred," he said, adding that it should not be possible to "punish someone in this country for something they did 10 years ago that wasn't an offense at the time."

The barrister for the Attorney-General Trent Glover said this was a false interpretation of the extradition procedure and nothing prevented Duggan from being sent to the United States.

Duggan's lawyers previously argued in court that there is no evidence the Chinese pilots he trained in South Africa between 2010 and 2012 were military, and he was no longer a U.S. citizen at the time of the alleged offences.

Duggan renounced his U.S. citizenship in 2016 at the U.S. embassy in Beijing and the certificate was backdated to 2012, they said.

A 2017 indictment in the United States said Duggan's alleged violation of an arms embargo imposed on China by the United States also included providing aviation services in China in 2010, and providing an assessment of China's aircraft carrier training.

Duggan, who has six children in Australia, has been held in prison since his arrest three years ago.

A small group of protesters stood outside the court with placards calling for Duggan's release.

His wife, Saffrine, said Duggan had been treated unlawfully and the Australian government had allowed him to become a pawn in an ideological war between the United States and China.

"It's been a real struggle," she told Reuters. "We just want Dan to come home."

https://www.straitstimes.com/asia/Former-US-Marine-pilot-who-trained-Chinese-flyers-appeals-extradition-from-Australia

https://x.com/FreeDanDuggan/status/1978587796492484990

https://x.com/FreeDanDuggan/status/1978949119818502445

https://qresear.ch/?q=daniel+duggan

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122391

File: f907f90f33d5b66⋯.jpg (125.53 KB,1130x848,565:424,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 5ce3fc3bc8f0300⋯.jpg (1.43 MB,5000x3333,5000:3333,Clipboard.jpg)

File: e71b858fd54ecc6⋯.jpg (341.34 KB,937x1418,937:1418,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23745027 (190636ZOCT25) Notable: Release of Virginia Giuffre's memoir renews sex allegations against Prince Andrew – Extracts from Virginia Giuffre’s posthumously released memoir Nobody’s Girl have reignited scrutiny of Prince Andrew, repeating allegations she was trafficked to the royal for sex as a minor — claims he has consistently denied. The Guardian published excerpts quoting Giuffre describing the prince as “friendly enough, but still entitled — as if he believed having sex with me was his birthright.” The memoir, completed before Giuffre’s death in April with journalist Amy Wallace, will be released next week. It comes amid resurfaced media reports linking Prince Andrew and Sarah, Duchess of York, to Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell, both convicted of sex offences.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122204

>>122245

>>122371

Release of Virginia Giuffre's memoir renews sex allegations against Prince Andrew

Dannielle Maguire - 16 Oct 2025

1/2

Extracts from Virginia Giuffre's posthumously released memoir have further intensified the recently renewed scrutiny on Prince Andrew, detailing allegations of being trafficked to the British royal.

Ms Giuffre took her own life earlier this year, but her story is being perpetuated in her book, Nobody's Girl: A Memoir of Surviving Abuse and Fighting for Justice, which will be released next week.

An extract published by The Guardian repeats her allegations of being forced to have sex with Prince Andrew as a minor in 2001 - a claim he has repeatedly denied.

"He was friendly enough, but still entitled - as if he believed having sex with me was his birthright," Giuffre wrote.

The extract comes days after British tabloids claimed to have confirmed the prince sent an email to convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein saying "it seems we're in this together".

Last month, multiple UK-based charities severed ties with Prince Andrew's ex-wife Sarah, the Duchess of York, after British media reported she described Epstein as a "steadfast, generous and supreme friend" in a 2011 letter.

Ms Giuffre wrote about an encounter she had with the prince in Epstein's girlfriend Ghislaine Maxwell's London house, saying the four of them went to a nightclub.

On the way home, Ms Giuffre alleges she was told to have sex with the prince.

She said the pair had a bath together but "didn't stay there long because the prince was eager to get to the bed".

"He seemed in a rush to have intercourse.

"Afterward, he said 'thank you' in his clipped British accent."

Who is Virginia Giuffre?

Virginia Giuffre, formerly known as Virginia Roberts, was a key figure in the campaign to bring Epstein to justice.

She was instrumental in making accusations of paedophilia, sex abuse and sex trafficking about the late financier public.

She had been vocal with her accusations of being sexually abused by Epstein as a teenager and trafficked to his wealthy, influential friends.

Among those, she alleged, was Prince Andrew.

In February 2011, UK newspaper The Mail on Sunday published a photo of Prince Andrew with his arm around Ms Giuffre alongside Epstein's girlfriend Ghislaine Maxwell.

The photo ran with a lengthy article in which Ms Giuffre detailed being trafficked by Epstein and being prepared to testify against him in the case that saw him convicted as a sex offender but handed a light sentence.

The online version of the 2011 article is careful not to accuse Prince Andrew of sexual misconduct, but raises questions about his associations with Epstein.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122392

File: 87435eac82e1ac8⋯.jpg (1016.66 KB,2600x2080,5:4,Clipboard.jpg)

File: e71b858fd54ecc6⋯.jpg (341.34 KB,937x1418,937:1418,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23745089 (190727ZOCT25) Notable: ‘Prince Andrew believed having sex with me was his birthright’:Virginia Giuffre on her abuse at the hands of Epstein, Maxwell and the king’s brother- In an extract from her posthumous memoir, Virginia Roberts Giuffre remembers the day an ‘apex predator’ recruited her from Mar-a-Lago, aged just 16; how she was trafficked to a succession of wealthy and powerful men - and how everyone knew what was going on.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122204

>>122245

>>122371

>>122391

‘Prince Andrew believed having sex with me was his birthright’: Virginia Giuffre on her abuse at the hands of Epstein, Maxwell and the king’s brother

Virginia Giuffre - Thu 16 Oct 2025

In an extract from her posthumous memoir, Virginia Roberts Giuffre remembers the day an ‘apex predator’ recruited her from Mar-a-Lago, aged just 16; how she was trafficked to a succession of wealthy and powerful men – and how everyone knew what was going on.

1/7

I can still remember walking on to the manicured grounds of Mar-a-Lago for the first time. It was early morning – my dad’s shift began at 7am, and I’d caught a ride to work with him. Already the air was heavy and moist, and the club’s 20 acres of carefully landscaped greens and lawns seemed to shimmer.

My dad was responsible for maintaining the resort’s in-room air-conditioning units, not to mention its five championship tennis courts, so he knew his way around. I remember he gave me a brief tour before presenting me to the hiring manager, who agreed to take me on. That first day, I was given a uniform – a white polo shirt, emblazoned with the Mar-a-Lago crest, and a short white skirt – and a name tag that said JENNA in all capital letters. (Although I was called Virginia, everyone at home called me Jenna.)

After a few days, my dad said he wanted to introduce me to Mr Trump himself. They weren’t friends, exactly. But Dad worked hard, and Trump liked that – I’d seen photos of them posing together, shaking hands. So one day my father took me to Trump’s office. “This is my daughter,” Dad said, and his voice sounded proud. Trump couldn’t have been friendlier, telling me it was fantastic that I was there. “Do you like kids?” he asked. “Do you babysit at all?” He explained that he owned several houses next to the resort that he lent to friends. Soon I was making extra money a few nights a week, minding the children of the elite.

But it was my day job that gave me my first real vision of a better future. The spa, like the resort itself, was gilded, with luxe finishes and an immaculate, sparkling decor. There were giant gold bathtubs, like something a god would soak in. I marvelled at how peaceful everyone seemed to feel within its walls. My duties – making tea, tidying the bathrooms, restocking towels – kept me just outside the inner sanctum of the massage rooms, but I could see how relaxed clients looked when they emerged. I seized on the idea that, with the right training, I could eventually make a living by helping others reduce stress. Maybe, I thought, their healing would fuel my own.

Then one steaming hot day some weeks before my 17th birthday, I was walking toward the Mar-a-Lago spa, on my way to work, when a car slowed behind me. Inside was a British socialite named Ghislaine Maxwell and her driver, Juan Alessi, whom she insisted on calling “John”. Alessi would later testify under oath that on this day, when Maxwell spotted me – my long blond hair, my slim build, and what he called my notably “young” appearance – she commanded him from the back seat, “Stop, John, stop!”

Alessi did as he was told, and I found out later that Maxwell got out and followed me. I didn’t know it yet, but an apex predator was closing in.

Picture a girl in a crisp white uniform sitting behind a marble reception desk. The girl is slender, with the freckled face of a child, and her long blond hair is held back with a tie. On this blisteringly hot afternoon, the spa is mostly empty, so the girl is at the front desk, reading a book about anatomy that she’s borrowed from the library. The girl hopes that studying this book will give her something she’s lacked for too long: purpose. What would it be like, she wonders, to excel at something?

I look up from my book to see a striking woman with short dark hair striding toward me.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122393

File: 809644a06b62121⋯.jpg (964.79 KB,2500x1563,2500:1563,Clipboard.jpg)

File: c416d4cd71ba5ac⋯.jpg (373.93 KB,2500x1563,2500:1563,Clipboard.jpg)

File: c9c6e3994badf6e⋯.jpg (299.12 KB,1241x1755,1241:1755,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23745186 (190815ZOCT25) Notable: Prince Andrew: I am giving up my royal titles – Prince Andrew has agreed with King Charles to stop using his titles, including Duke of York, saying “continued accusations” against him had become a distraction to the monarchy. In a statement released by Buckingham Palace, Andrew said he had “always put my duty to my family and country first” and would “no longer use my title or the honours which have been conferred upon me.” The decision follows renewed scrutiny of his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein and continuing fallout from Virginia Giuffre’s posthumous memoir. Palace aides described the move as a “tipping point” after years of scandal and public pressure from the King and Prince William. Virginia Giuffre’s family hailed the announcement as “vindication”, while Epstein survivor Haley Robson said it showed “someone is finally being held accountable.”

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122204

>>122245

>>122371

>>122391

>>122392

Prince Andrew: I am giving up my royal titles

Royal will no longer be known as Duke of York after agreeing with King that ‘continued accusations’ had become a distraction

Victoria Ward and Robert Mendick - 17 October 2025

1/3

Prince Andrew has agreed with the King to stop using his titles, including the Duke of York, saying he had “always put my duty to my family and country first”.

The development, first revealed by The Telegraph, followed a string of new scandals concerning the Royal’s relationship with Jeffrey Epstein and his relationship with an alleged Chinese spy.

In a statement released by Buckingham Palace, Prince Andrew said: “In discussion with The King, and my immediate and wider family, we have concluded the continued accusations about me distract from the work of His Majesty and the Royal family.

“I have decided, as I always have, to put my duty to my family and country first. I stand by my decision five years ago to stand back from public life.

“With His Majesty’s agreement, we feel I must now go a step further. I will therefore no longer use my title or the honours which have been conferred upon me. As I have said previously, I vigorously deny the accusations against me.”

His decision to put all of his titles “in abeyance” was prompted by huge pressure from the King. The Prince will also give up his membership of the Order of the Garter. The Prince had also already agreed to put his HRH title in abeyance and his role as Counsellor of State is inactive as he is not a working member of the Royal family.

His ex-wife, Sarah, Duchess of York, will also relinquish her title and will simply be known as Sarah Ferguson.

The decision was taken in close consultation with the King and the Prince of Wales, it is understood. The King was said to be “glad” at the outcome.

Prince William has long pushed for more decisive action against his uncle and was instrumental in persuading the late Queen to ensure he did not take part in the traditional Garter Day procession in 2022.

Earlier this month, he appeared to grimace as Prince Andrew stood alongside him, laughing and chatting following the Duchess of Kent’s funeral at Westminster Cathedral.

Friday’s announcement, on Buckingham Palace headed paper, was titled: “A statement from Prince Andrew” as the change came in with immediate effect.

It would previously have been attributed to “the Duke of York”.

Palace aides stressed that he remains the son of Elizabeth II and that therefore the title of Prince will still be used, in accordance with Letters Patent issued in 1917 by George V which were updated by the late Queen in 2012.

The titles of his daughters, Princesses Beatrice and Eugenie, are also unaffected.

Meanwhile, the Prince will continue to live at the family home, Royal Lodge in Windsor.

Palace efforts to force him out failed because of a watertight lease agreement with the Crown Estate that does not expire until 2078.

Both Prince Andrew and Ms Ferguson had already been told they were not welcome to join the family at Sandringham this Christmas.

The agreement was made following high level meetings at Buckingham Palace as aides finally reached “tipping point”.

After days of yet more revelations that threatened the reputation of the monarchy, the King was finally prepared to press the nuclear button.

Until now, the palace had resisted taking such punitive action but felt its hand had finally been forced.

Palace aides had become increasingly frustrated as the latest scandals involving the Prince overshadowed official royal engagements.

The last thing they wanted was the King and Queen’s high profile and historically significant visit to the Vatican next week being overshadowed by further damaging headlines.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122394

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23745208 (190832ZOCT25) Notable: Video: Virginia Giuffre's brother calls for Andrew to be stripped of prince title – Virginia Giuffre’s brother, Sky Roberts, has urged King Charles to strip Prince Andrew of the title “prince” following his decision to relinquish his other titles, including Duke of York. Roberts said his late sister would be “very proud” of the development and called for “responsibility and accountability for these survivors.” Prince Andrew, who settled a civil case with Giuffre in 2022 without admitting liability, continues to deny her allegations that he had sex with her when she was 17. Roberts described the move as “vindication” for his sister and a “joyous moment” for survivors, adding that “the truth will find its way out.” The release of Giuffre’s posthumous memoir next week is expected to renew scrutiny of Andrew’s links to Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122391

>>122392

>>122393

>>122393

Virginia Giuffre's brother calls for Andrew to be stripped of prince title

George Wright - 19 October 2025

1/2

The brother of Virginia Giuffre has called on King Charles to strip Prince Andrew of the title "prince" after he announced he is giving up his other titles, including the Duke of York.

Ms Giuffre alleged that the prince had sex with her when she was 17-years-old at the house of his friend Ghislaine Maxwell's in London in 2001.

The prince made a financial payment to Ms Giuffre in an out-of-court settlement in 2022, after she had brought a civil case against him. He denies all the accusations against him.

Sky Roberts told BBC Newsnight his sister, who took her own life earlier this year, would be "very proud" of the latest development regarding Prince Andrew.

The prince has been under increasing pressure over his links with sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, with calls for Buckingham Palace to take action against him.

On Friday, the prince announced that he was deciding to voluntarily hand back his titles and to give up membership of the Order of the Garter, the oldest and most senior order of chivalry in Britain.

He will also cease be the Duke of York, a title received from his mother, the late Queen Elizabeth II.

But Mr Roberts said he would like to see the king go a step further, saying: "We would call on the King to potentially go ahead and take out the prince in the Andrew."

"I think anybody that was implicated in this should have some sort of resolve. They should have some sort of responsibility and accountability for these survivors," he said, adding that he would "welcome any contact from the king, from members of parliament".

When Prince Andrew was born in 1960, he was automatically a prince as the son of a monarch. This could only be changed if a Letters Patent was issued by the King.

In his statement on Friday, Prince Andrew said: "In discussion with the King, and my immediate and wider family, we have concluded the continued accusations about me distract from the work of His Majesty and the Royal Family.

"I have decided, as I always have, to put my duty to my family and country first.

"I stand by my decision five years ago to stand back from public life.

"With His Majesty's agreement, we feel I must now go a step further. I will therefore no longer use my title or the honours which have been conferred upon me. As I have said previously, I vigorously deny the accusations against me."

He said he continued to "vigorously deny the accusations against me".

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122395

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23745222 (190842ZOCT25) Notable: Video: Prince Andrew ‘gagged’ Virginia Giuffre to avoid spoiling Queen’s jubilee, book claims – Virginia Giuffre’s posthumous memoir alleges that Prince Andrew required her to sign a one-year gag order as part of their 2022 settlement, to avoid embarrassing Queen Elizabeth II during her Platinum Jubilee. “It ensured that his mother’s Platinum Jubilee would not be tarnished any more than it already had been,” she wrote. Giuffre said Andrew’s disastrous 2019 Newsnight interview — in which he denied meeting her and cited an inability to sweat — gave her legal team “an injection of jet fuel.” The book recounts her disbelief at seeing him with Jeffrey Epstein after his conviction and details her civil case, which ended with a reported $12m payout and a tacit acknowledgment of victims’ suffering.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122371

>>122391

>>122392

>>122393

Prince Andrew ‘gagged’ Virginia Giuffre to avoid spoiling Queen’s jubilee, book claims

Posthumous memoir describes how the Prince’s disastrous Newsnight interview provided ammunition for Giuffre’s civil suit

Rob Crilly - 18 October 2025

1/2

Prince Andrew insisted Virginia Giuffre sign a gag order so that he would not embarrass Elizabeth II during her Platinum Jubilee.

Details of the legal battle and eventual agreement are revealed in Giuffre’s posthumous memoir, which will be published next week.

The book’s claims will heap further embarrassment on the Prince who was forced to relinquish his Dukedom on Friday to avoid inflicting further damage on the Royal family.

It describes how Prince Andrew’s disastrous Newsnight interview provided ammunition for her civil suit.

The Prince reached an out-of-court settlement with Giuffre on Feb 15 2022.

Giuffre claimed she was sexually abused or raped by Prince Andrew on three separate occasions when she was 17. She sued him for unspecified damages.

The Prince denied all the allegations and the settlement included no admission of guilt, but Giuffre said his acknowledgement of the abuse suffered by Epstein’s victims brought tears to her eyes.

“I agreed to a one-year gag order, which seemed important to the Prince because it ensured that his mother’s Platinum Jubilee would not be tarnished any more than it already had been,” she wrote.

The Prince was reportedly intent on clearing his name, even as headlines about the case threatened to overshadow his mother’s big year.

The settlement meant Giuffre was silenced, barred from discussing the abuse she suffered at the hands of Epstein, throughout the late Queen’s Platinum Jubilee celebrations in 2022.

Giuffre finished writing Nobody’s Girl: A Memoir of Surviving Abuse and Fighting for Justice in October last year. She took her own life six months later.

Her book describes how she was recruited by Ghislaine Maxwell to work for Epstein at the age of 16.

Maxwell is serving a 20-year jail sentence for procuring underage girls for Epstein.

Epstein was arrested in 2019 and charged with running a sex trafficking network involving dozens of underage girls at his homes in New York and Palm Beach, Florida.

He died by suicide before he could face trial.

The book sets out Giuffre’s allegations that she was trafficked to a string of rich and powerful men.

She describes her astonishment that Prince Andrew was photographed in public with the financier in 2010, after he served a sentence for sex crimes, including procuring a child for prostitution.

And it details her legal battle with the Prince after suing him for unspecified damages in 2021.

Her case, she said, built on some of the claims he made in his 2019 Newsnight interview when he said he did not remember ever meeting Giuffre.

The interview was a public relations disaster for the member of the Royal family.

The Prince said he was with one of his daughters at the Woking branch of Pizza Express on the night Giuffre claimed to have first been trafficked to him, and that he could not have been seen dancing sweatily with her at a nightclub because he had temporarily lost the ability to perspire because of an “overdose of adrenaline” during his service during the Falklands War.

“As devastating as this interview was for Prince Andrew, for my legal team it was like an injection of jet fuel,” Giuffre wrote.

“Its contents would not only help us build an ironclad case against the Prince but also open the door to potentially subpoenaing his ex-wife, Sarah Ferguson, and their daughters, Princesses Beatrice and Eugenie.”

“The world didn’t know it, but settlement discussions with Prince Andrew’s team were suddenly moving quickly,” she wrote.

“After he’d stonewalled us for months, the scheduling of his deposition, which was to take place on March 10, seemed to motivate him.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122396

File: f513d03d32e1d6e⋯.jpg (256.27 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: a892f67b0de30e5⋯.jpg (158.53 KB,1440x1081,1440:1081,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23745272 (190916ZOCT25) Notable: Anthony Albanese has fingers crossed for ‘constructive’ meeting with Donald Trump – Prime Minister Anthony Albanese will meet US President Donald Trump at the White House on Tuesday for talks focused on the $368bn AUKUS deal and expanding US investment in Australia’s critical minerals sector. Albanese said he was “looking forward to a positive and constructive meeting” and called it an opportunity to “consolidate and strengthen” the alliance. The visit comes amid calls from Washington for higher Australian defence spending and concerns about China’s dominance in rare earth supply chains. Defence Industry Minister Pat Conroy said Australia’s 2.8 per cent defence spend was already higher than most Indo-Pacific allies. Albanese’s short Washington trip precedes visits to Malaysia, South Korea and Japan for upcoming ASEAN and APEC summits.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122300

>>122320

>>122367

>>122380

>>122381

Anthony Albanese has fingers crossed for ‘constructive’ meeting with Donald Trump

GEOFF CHAMBERS - 18 October 2025

1/2

Anthony Albanese’s 48 hours in Washington will have a laser focus on the $368bn AUKUS deal and US investment unlocking Australia’s vast critical minerals and rare earths deposits.

Ahead of flying to Washington DC on Sunday for a sit-down with Donald Trump at the White House, the Prime Minister declared that “Australia and the US have stood shoulder to shoulder in every major conflict for over a ­century”.

Mr Albanese, who is scheduled to meet with the billionaire Republican in the Oval Office early on Tuesday (AEDT), said he “looked forward to a positive and constructive meeting with President Trump at the White House”.

“Our meeting is an important opportunity to consolidate and strengthen the Australia-US relationship,” he said after returning to work following a week’s leave.

The long-awaited meeting with Mr Trump marks the Labor leader’s second visit to the White House after Joe Biden hosted Mr Albanese for a state visit in Oct­ober 2023.

Resources Minister Madeleine King and Industry Minister Tim Ayres, who lead the government’s critical minerals and Future Made in Australia strategies, will join Mr Albanese in Washington.

In addition to elevating US access to Australia’s vast critical minerals and rare earths deposits, Mr Albanese is expected to use the trip and talks with Mr Trump to highlight the trade surplus enjoyed by the US since the 1950s, deep security links tracing back to World War I and the multitrillion-dollar investment and trade relationship.

The critical minerals focus will likely strengthen US-Australia co-operation in diversifying supply chains away from China.

Mr Albanese this month told The Australian he was determined to “value-add” and develop sovereign mining, refining and processing systems that create jobs and maximise commercial opportunities and benefits for Australia.

Accelerating global supply of domestic-based critical minerals and rare earths, which are used for a range of defence applications, munitions and other military hardware as well as medical, manufacturing and com­munications technologies, would require significant investment and buy-in from the Trump ­administration.

The visit comes amid rising concerns in the US over Beijing’s export threats and dominance of rare earths and critical minerals supply chains that underpin tech developed across the defence, electronics, medical and auto industries. US officials have also raised concerns about the aggressive expansion of China’s People’s Liberation Army and the risk of Xi Jinping potentially ordering an invasion of Taiwan by 2027.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122397

File: 5340e41fe66ad8b⋯.jpg (446.36 KB,2880x2160,4:3,Clipboard.jpg)

File: eae3376de2c0561⋯.jpg (281.55 KB,2000x1334,1000:667,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 7a64250fde90e0d⋯.jpg (319.2 KB,2000x1334,1000:667,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 17c9149944d1984⋯.jpg (2.13 MB,5551x3701,5551:3701,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 9d620ade7763703⋯.jpg (1.08 MB,3000x1954,1500:977,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23745283 (190926ZOCT25) Notable: The key card Albanese can play to keep Trump on side in Oval Office – Anthony Albanese enters his White House meeting with Donald Trump determined to avoid the “Zelensky moment” or humiliation of other leaders. With AUKUS under review, he carries a package of critical minerals, defence spending and superannuation investment to win over Trump’s transactional instincts. Former ambassador Kim Beazley said Australia must “practise statecraft” and present its resources as strategic assets. Analysts warn Trump “abhors weakness” but respects firmness, making confidence essential. AUKUS’s value as a bulwark against China and its support for US submarine production form the backbone of Albanese’s pitch, while Canberra stresses shared economic, security and industrial benefits.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122300

>>122367

>>122380

>>122381

>>122396

The key card Albanese can play to keep Trump on side in Oval Office

Avoiding a “Zelensky moment” or the humiliation of South Africa’s Cyril Ramaphosa will be a top priority for the prime minister as he walks into the White House this week.

Michael Koziol - OCTOBER 19, 2025

1/2

Washington: Kim Beazley, the former Labor leader, defence minister and ambassador to the US, urged Anthony Albanese not to rush to secure a meeting with US President Donald Trump, at least until the fate of AUKUS was known.

“But if they invite you, you have to go,” Beazley says. “They obviously felt bad about it,” he said of the failed attempts for the two men to meet.

Albanese arrives in Washington with the AUKUS defence pact still under a cloud but confident the $368 billion agreement will proceed as planned. He also comes armed with a goodie bag of critical minerals, new defence spending and superannuation money intended to satiate the US president’s desires.

“What have we got to offer? Shitloads,” says Beazley.

This is Albanese’s seventh trip to the US as prime minister, and his sixth interaction with Trump – if you count last month’s handshake and selfie at the United Nations in New York.

The wait for a face-to-face encounter – and the pure politics of Albanese being of the centre-left and Trump a right-wing Republican – has brewed a narrative from some commentators (and the opposition) that Australia is on the back foot, losing favour in Washington and fearful of what might transpire in the Oval Office.

Beazley says that’s wrong. “I don’t think he’s scared about meeting Trump at all,” he says. “Albo is a developed Albo. He’s been there now quite a while. He’s very self-confident.”

Nonetheless, there have been nerves in Washington this week that exceed the usual level of carefulness from Australia’s embassy and its ambassador, former Labor prime minister Kevin Rudd.

On Thursday, Rudd hosted a full-day AUKUS summit at the embassy, with a packed speakers’ list that included Rudd, five members of the US Congress, Australia’s Defence Industry Minister Pat Conroy, Defence Department secretary Greg Moriarty and British Prime Minister Keir Starmer’s special adviser on AUKUS, Steven Lovegrove, among many others.

Presented by the American Australian Association, the summit and its entire agenda were advertised online. But unlike the equivalent event last year – which was not held at the embassy – the media was not allowed inside, not even for the keynote addresses. US sources indicated they were disappointed by that.

Journalists were likewise not permitted at another event Conroy attended with defence industry figures and members of Congress the previous evening. And Australian media were not told Rudd would be speaking on stage at the Institute of International Finance’s annual conference in Washington.

Conroy and Treasurer Jim Chalmers, who was visiting for a financial summit, did hold press conferences while in town. And it is common for the embassy to hold private functions. But the degree of secrecy regarding events in Washington this week has frustrated Australian correspondents in the lead-up to the prime minister’s meeting with Trump.

Publicly, the government is projecting confidence about the encounter. It is convinced the AUKUS defence pact will survive Trump’s “America First” review, and knows it has a compelling offer to make on critical minerals at a time when the US is desperate to find alternative suppliers to China.

Privately, though, some are anxious about what could happen when Albanese comes face to face with the highly transactional, notoriously impulsive Trump. Avoiding a “Zelensky moment”, or the humiliation of South Africa’s Cyril Ramaphosa, is a top priority.

“Anthony Albanese would like to have a meeting that affirms the importance of the alliance, and get out of the Oval Office without any fireworks,” says Charles Edel, Australia chair at the bipartisan Centre for Strategic and International Studies think tank in Washington. “That’s clearly what everyone’s gunning for.”

But that’s not guaranteed, Edel says, noting Trump has happily bullied his close ally and neighbour, Canada.

“I think that we can say that Donald Trump has, generally speaking, a warm set of feelings toward Australia – he generally thinks of Australia as a good ally. That doesn’t necessarily translate into his desire to have a positive meeting no matter what.”

On the sensitive topic of defence spending, Albanese can make the case that Australia is already lifting expenditure and making key investments that benefit the US, including $12 billion for the Henderson shipyard and this week’s announcement about co-production of guided missiles.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122398

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23745354 (190948ZOCT25) Notable: ‘Melbourne has had a gutful’: Two officers hospitalised, flags burnt and missiles thrown at police as opposing protesters converge in CBD – (Video) Violent clashes erupted in Melbourne’s CBD as anti-immigration and counter-protest groups hurled rocks, bottles and debris at police, leaving two officers hospitalised. Commander Wayne Cheesman condemned the violence, saying “Melbourne has had a gutful” and that the attacks “could kill someone.” Police accused left-wing counter-protesters of fuelling unrest, while organisers claimed officers used excessive force. Premier Jacinta Allan and Opposition Leader Brad Battin condemned the violence, calling for accountability. The far-right March for Australia rally, linked to neo-Nazi figures, drew around 1000 participants, as counter-protesters chanted “no Nazis ever again.” Police used flash bangs and rubber bullets to separate the groups in what Cheesman called “a bad day for Melbourne.”

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122354

>>122355

>>122369

>>122384

‘Melbourne has had a gutful’: Two officers hospitalised, flags burnt and missiles thrown at police as opposing protesters converge in CBD

Ashleigh McMillan - October 19, 2025

1/3

Police have sharply criticised protesters in Melbourne’s CBD after two officers were taken to hospital and rocks, glass and rotten fruit were thrown at officers during violent scuffles.

Police spent hours on Sunday afternoon trying to keep anti-immigration protesters and separate counter-protesters apart, with the counter-protesters accused of fuelling the violence, although they disputed that claim on Sunday night.

A visibly frustrated Commander Wayne Cheesman said protesters had pelted police with bluestone rocks, similar to those found on railway tracks, and bottles filled with glass shards, set bins on fire and even threw a cantaloupe as tensions boiled over at the rallies on Sunday.

“Melbourne has had a gutful,” Cheesman said moments after holding up a large rock, which he said had been thrown at police. “The disruption to Melbourne, to the general public who want to come into our fine city, the disruption to businesses … we really need to find an answer of what we do. Enough is enough.

“It appals me, really. This could kill someone. That’s the bottom line.”

He tipped out a cardboard box filled with other rocks during a heated press conference following the protests.

“I show you the rocks because I think the public needs to see what the police are being targeted with,” he said.

“It’s a bad day for Victoria Police. It’s a bad day for Melbourne. It’s a bad day for the community.”

Rally organisers hit back via social media on Sunday night, claiming some protesters were hospitalised due to police actions.

“We condemn the violent acts of Victoria Police,” rally organiser Yasmin said.

“We are appalled by the comments of police commander Wayne Cheesman who praised the far right hate march. It is not peaceful to organise a rally calling for Black and Brown people to not be allowed in this country.

“Police deployed violence which injured activists, with nearly five hospitalised. Police denied thousands the right to protest, while facilitating the racist, hateful demonstration March for Australia, exercising white sovereignty to defend a white Australia ideology.”

Cheesman praised March for Australia organisers for being “peaceful, engaging and they did what they were told”.

Premier Jacinta Allan thanked police on Sunday night and said some people “just want to protest for the sake of protest”.

“While they have the right to do so in a democratic system, they have an obligation to do it peacefully,” Allan said.

“The moment they get violent like they did today – picking up rocks and hurling them at police – they deserve to face serious consequences.

Opposition Leader Brad Battin said Victorians would be rightly angry about the protests and demanded greater action from the government.

“This was a disgraceful attack on our police officers,” he said. “Being pelted with rocks and bottles isn’t free speech – it’s criminal violence.”

Lord Mayor Nick Reece accused protesters of ruining the city and pledged to work with the state government to end the “cycle of madness”.

“What we are seeing on the streets of our great city is a form of civic insanity,” he said.

Hundreds of police were on the streets on Sunday as the crowds of opposing demonstrators, estimated at about 1000 people each, gathered at the rallies. Racist slogans were chanted at an anti-immigration protest, while Australian flags were burnt by pro-immigration counter-protesters.

One female sergeant was taken to hospital with a suspected broken hand after being kicked by protesters, police said.

A male senior constable sustained a non-life-threatening cut to the lower leg and was taken to hospital.

“I have a member with a nasty gash on his leg from Corio,” Cheesman said.

Three other officers were hit by rocks but not injured. One 30-year-old woman from Brunswick West was arrested.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122399

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23745404 (191009ZOCT25) Notable: Video: Police hospitalised, pepper spray used in violent Melbourne protests – Two police officers have been hospitalised and several injured after violent clashes between anti-immigration demonstrators and left-wing “anti-racism” activists in Melbourne’s CBD. Police deployed pepper spray, tear gas and rubber bullets to regain control as officers were pelted with rocks, glass and burning debris. Commander Wayne Cheesman said “Melbourne has had a gutful,” accusing “issue-motivated groups on the left” of trying to attack police, while Premier Jacinta Allan condemned the violence, vowing offenders would face “serious consequences.” Hundreds of officers were deployed as fights broke out near Spring Street and Exhibition Street. The clashes marked the second major confrontation involving March for Australia this year. Similar rallies occurred in other capitals but Melbourne saw the worst unrest.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122398

Police hospitalised, pepper spray used in violent Melbourne protests

MOHAMMAD ALFARES - 19 October 2025

1/2

Two Victoria Police officers have been hospitalised after left-wing “anti-racism” activists – including pro-Palestinian demonstrators – attacked police during violent clashes with an anti-immigration group in Melbourne’s CBD, forcing officers to deploy pepper spray, tear gas and rubber bullets to regain control.

Officers were forced to intervene when counter-protesters with the Campaign Against Racism and Fascism attempted to confront members of the ultraconservative March for Australia movement, who had rallied to demand an end to what they called “mass immigration”.

A female sergeant is believed to have suffered a broken hand after being kicked, while a male senior constable sustained a deep gash to his leg. Police said other officers were struck with such force that their riot shields cracked.

At least one person was arrested, and detectives are reviewing footage to identify others involved.

Condemning the violence in a statement issued on Sunday evening, Victorian Premier Jacinta Allan thanked the men and women of Victoria Police for their work, and said new protest laws being introduced next month would soon give them more powers to prevent it.

In a fiery press conference, Commander Wayne Cheesman held up a box filled with rocks and smashed glass bottles, saying the objects had been hurled at officers.

“This is what was thrown at police today and I think Melbourne has had a gutful,” he said.

“The left-wing group were running up and down side streets. We were lucky we had barriers and police in place, but they were desperately trying to get to the March for Australia group, who was for a long time static at Parliament House.

“Bottles filled with shards of glass were being thrown at police. Rotten fruit, bins and flags were set on fire. People came to pick a fight with police.

“The people that came to pick the fight with police were the issue-motivated groups on the left,” he said.

“The March for Australia group – they were peaceful, engaging and followed instructions. The others came with masks, hoodies and umbrellas, throwing rocks and hiding behind barriers. They came to harm our members, and it’s got to stop.”

Premier Allan said it was clear that “some people just want to protest for the sake of protest”.

“While they have the right to do so in a democratic system, they have an obligation to do it peacefully,” she said.

“The moment they get violent like they did today – picking up rocks and hurling them at police – they deserve to face serious consequences.

“Police are now investigating, and I have every confidence that those responsible will be dealt with to the full extent of the law.

“I want to thank the men and women of Victoria Police for their work dealing with this.

“No one has the right to hide behind a cause, or a mask, with the intention of committing violence.”

Commander Cheeseman said hundreds of police had been deployed from across Victoria to control what he described as a “volatile and violent environment”, adding that police resources had been drained to deal with protesters during a “crime crisis”.

“Today was a bad day for Victoria Police. I think it was a bad day for Melbourne, and we’re trying to portray a city that we want people to come and visit. We have enough problem with the crime crisis, and I’ll call it a crisis because we don’t have enough police,” he said.

The confrontation marked the second major flare-up involving March for Australia in Melbourne this year, after a similar rally in August descended into violent brawls.

March for Australia rallies took place in major cities across Australia on Sunday demanding an “end to mass-immigration now”. Several thousand gathered in Adelaide and Brisbane. In Sydney about 5000 protesters took to the streets, with only a few hundred counter protesters.

But Melbourne witnessed the most violence, with Commander Cheeseman comparing the protest to the contentious Land Forces protest last year.

Pepper spray and other tactical force was deployed on hard left anti-racism protesters countering the March for Australia rally, while a smaller group of anti-immigration activists later fought with police near Spring Street, prompting the use of tear gas and rubber bullets, according to the Herald Sun.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122400

File: 9139fa2f5b38e3b⋯.jpg (707.42 KB,3000x2067,1000:689,Clipboard.jpg)

File: e71b858fd54ecc6⋯.jpg (341.34 KB,937x1418,937:1418,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 6adfd06f4b9ac5b⋯.jpg (3.46 MB,5947x3957,5947:3957,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 2ccc7dcea77659e⋯.jpg (1.03 MB,4180x2858,2090:1429,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 48a3aa58abc0881⋯.jpg (1.29 MB,3024x4032,3:4,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23745422 (191017ZOCT25) Notable: Virginia Giuffre beaten, raped by ‘well-known prime minister’ in attack that broke Epstein spell, her memoir reveals – Virginia Giuffre’s posthumous memoir Nobody’s Girl describes how her experiences under Jeffrey Epstein’s control ended after a violent encounter with a “well-known prime minister.” Giuffre wrote that the ordeal forced her to realise Epstein’s praise was “a manipulation to keep me subservient.” She referred to the man only as “the Prime Minister,” fearing retaliation if she revealed his name, though previous court filings had named Israel’s former leader Ehud Barak, who has repeatedly denied her claims. Giuffre said Epstein dismissed her pleas for protection and later sent her to meet the politician again. The memoir, written before her death in April, also details her decision to stop recruiting girls and plan her escape from Epstein’s circle.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122371

>>122391

>>122392

>>122393

>>122395

Virginia Giuffre beaten, raped by ‘well-known prime minister’ in attack that broke Epstein spell, her memoir reveals

Katherine Donlevy - Oct. 18, 2025

Prominent Jeffrey Epstein victim Virginia Roberts Giuffre was brutally bloodied, beaten and raped by a “well-known prime minister” in a series of savage encounters that finally helped the teenager break free from the sex trafficker’s spell.

In her posthumous memoir “Nobody’s Girl: A Memoir of Surviving Abuse and Fighting for Justice,” Giuffre recalled begging Epstein to step in after the unnamed politician forced her to beg for her life — but the pedophile coldly told her it was simply part of her job.

“After the attack, I couldn’t stay a fool. Having been treated so brutally and then seeing Epstein’s callous reaction to how terrorized I felt, I had to accept that Epstein meted out praise merely as a manipulation to keep me subservient,” Giuffre wrote, according to an excerpt shared with The Post.

“Epstein cared only about Epstein.”

Giuffre simply referred to the deranged man as the “Prime Minister,” saying she was afraid the brute would “seek to hurt” her if she printed his name.

In the past, however, she pointed to Israel’s Prime Minister Ehud Barak in court filings as one of the many elites who had raped her, a claim he has repeatedly denied.

In her memoir, Giuffre said she first met the “Prime Minister” on Epstein’s private island in the US Virgin Islands sometime in 2002, when she was just 18.

She was ordered to escort him to a cabana, but the man made it clear as soon as they were alone that “he wanted violence.”

“He repeatedly choked me until I lost consciousness and took pleasure in seeing me in fear for my life. Horrifically, the Prime Minister laughed when he hurt me and got more aroused when I begged him to stop. I emerged from the cabana bleeding from my mouth, vagina, and anus. For days, it hurt to breathe and to swallow,” Giuffre wrote.

The politician “raped me more savagely than anyone had before.”

She immediately rushed to Epstein and begged him not to send her back to the Prime Minister.

“I got down on my knees and pleaded with him. I don’t know if Epstein feared the man or if he owed him a favor, but he wouldn’t make any promises, saying coldly of the politician’s brutality, ‘You’ll get that sometimes,'” she continued.

Sometime later, Epstein sent her back to the politician for a second encounter conducted entirely in a cabin aboard the Lolita Express.

Although the experience was far less violent, Giuffre spent the entire hour in fear he would suddenly strike or strangle her, she wrote.

Giuffre admitted that before the violent experience, she had given Epstein the benefit of the doubt and believed he cared for the girls he sex trafficked.

She was not completely naive, she wrote, acknowledging that his “predilection for childlike girls was a sickness, but that in his twisted way he meant well.”

His indifference to her fear and injuries from the Prime Minister forced the 18-year-old to face the truth.

Chillingly, Giuffre then predicted her own death in the passage, saying she would not survive a life of sex trafficking and would either take her own life or die at the hands of one of Epstein’s friends.

“I didn’t know it then, but my second interaction with the Prime Minister was the beginning of the end for me,” Giuffre said, adding she stopped recruiting other young girls for Epstein as he had forced her to do in the past.

The final breaking point came that summer when Epstein and his madam, Ghislaine Maxwell, pleaded with Giuffre to carry their child — a proposal that came with mansions, wealth and round-the-clock nannies, but would require her to sign away any legal rights.

The teen immediately worried they were planning to use the baby as a future trafficking victim and began planning her escape plan.

She left the couple’s grasp not long after, but her experiences haunted her for the rest of her life — particularly the “greedy, cruel look on the Prime Minister’s face as he watched me beg for my life.”

Barak has repeatedly denied Giuffre’s abuse claims or knowledge that Epstein was running a perverted sex ring.

Barak was a personal friend of Epstein’s and used several million dollars of Epstein’s money to finance a security company.

Records show he had visited Epstein on his private island and had boarded his private plane.

The chilling tale was included in Giuffre’s memoir, set to be released next week, which she penned in the years before her tragic suicide in April. She was 41.

https://nypost.com/2025/10/18/us-news/virginia-giuffre-was-left-bloodied-and-beaten-by-prime-minister/

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122401

File: bc1f60d2b02b14f⋯.mp4 (12.77 MB,640x1080,16:27,Clipboard.mp4)

File: b698e0dc729c9bc⋯.jpg (367.24 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 1291df6c99d9f5e⋯.jpg (318.64 KB,2048x1536,4:3,Clipboard.jpg)

File: d88dc79e3bfe8d2⋯.jpg (188.86 KB,768x1025,768:1025,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23748303 (200823ZOCT25) Notable: Video: Victoria to ban masks and chaining at protests as Jacinta Allan insists Melbourne CBD is safe – Victoria will introduce new laws banning protesters from wearing masks or chaining themselves to structures, with Premier Jacinta Allan saying such tactics are being used to conceal identities and endanger others. The crackdown follows violent clashes in Melbourne’s CBD that left two police officers hospitalised. Ms Allan said the legislation would expand police powers while protecting the right to peaceful protest. Opposition Leader Brad Battin accused the government of ignoring public safety, while Ms Allan insisted Melbourne “remains safe,” blaming a “small number” of agitators for recent unrest. The laws are expected to be introduced to parliament within weeks.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122398

>>122399

Victoria to ban masks and chaining at protests as Jacinta Allan insists Melbourne CBD is safe

ANTHONY GALLOWAY - 20 October 2025

1/2

Protesters will be banned from wearing face masks and chaining or gluing themselves to structures under new laws to be introduced to Victorian parliament, as Premier Jacinta Allan insists Melbourne’s CBD remains safe despite a violent 2000-strong protest that left two police officers injured.

Under the proposed laws, the Allan government will prohibit the use of face masks at protests, saying they are being used to conceal identities and shield agitators from crowd-control measures such as capsicum spray.

Protesters will also be banned from using glue, rope, chains, locks and other devices used to attach themselves to property or block access — tactics the government says cause maximum disruption and endanger others.

Ms Allan on Monday defended the delay in introducing the legislation, first announced in December last year, saying it had been subject to extensive consultation to ensure the right balance was truck between cracking down on protesters and protecting the right to protest.

“That is why, in addition to existing powers that Victoria Police have … we are going to expand those police powers with new laws to deal with people who are cloaking themselves under masks to perform violent acts under the cloak of a protest,” Ms Allan said.

The Premier said the legislation would be introduced “in the coming weeks” but could not guarantee it would pass before the end of the year. “That’s a matter for the parliament,” she said.

It comes after the Allan government has toughened bail laws and given police expanded powers to search protesters for weapons and Victoria Police has embarked on a significant restructure to get more frontline officers on the streets.

The announcement follows a weekend of unrest that saw hundreds of police deployed to separate a March for Australia rally and an “anti-racism” counter-protest in central Melbourne. Officers were pelted with rocks and glass bottles by members of the latter group.

A female sergeant and a male senior constable were hospitalised with non-life-threatening injuries, sparking police commander Wayne Cheesman to say that Melbourne has had a “gutful” of protests.

Victoria Police on Monday released an image of one of the injured officers’ bloodied and gashed leg.

Police said a senior constable from Corio sustained a serious leg laceration, while a female sergeant in her early 40s from Boroondara suffered a serious hand injury. Both have since been released from hospital but are expected to be off work for several weeks.

“Instead of working on the frontline to prevent crime and keep their local communities safe, they will be recovering after having glass bottles deliberately thrown at them,” a police spokesperson said.

A 30-year-old Brunswick woman was arrested and charged with resisting police. She has been bailed to appear before the Melbourne Magistrates Court on May 15 next year.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122402

File: 6c0153a03a3a063⋯.jpg (247.75 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 53423937e74c6d9⋯.jpg (593.6 KB,2048x1536,4:3,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23748324 (200835ZOCT25) Notable: Google starts legal fight to overturn social media ban for under-16s – Google is preparing to challenge the Albanese government’s under-16 social media ban, arguing YouTube should not be classified as a social platform and that the law breaches Australia’s implied right to political freedom. The ban, effective December 10, will block access for under-16s to YouTube, TikTok, Instagram, Facebook, Snapchat, Threads and X. Google has hired senior barristers and may be joined by other tech firms in the case. Communications Minister Anika Wells warned platforms of hefty fines for non-compliance, while the issue is expected to surface during Anthony Albanese’s meeting with US President Donald Trump. Google has declined to comment publicly.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109415 (pb)

>>109444 (pb)

>>122249

>>122303

>>122304

>>122375

Google starts legal fight to overturn social media ban for under-16s

JAMES MADDEN - 20 October 2025

Google is preparing to launch a last-ditch legal challenge to the constitutional validity of the federal government’s social media ban for children under 16, with the tech giant set to argue that its video-sharing platform YouTube falls outside the terms of the legislation.

It’s understood Google has already engaged several high-profile barristers ahead of the likely legal action, which is expected to be launched early next month.

The Albanese government’s landmark social media ban will come into effect on December 10, with under-16s to be denied access forthwith to Facebook, Instagram, YouTube, TikTok, Snapchat, Threads and X, while existing accounts held by under-age children will be deactivated.

Google, which owns YouTube, is preparing to initiate its appeal against the inclusion of YouTube in the ban on the grounds that it is not a social media platform.

It’s understood Google is also expected to argue that the social media ban represents a breach of the implied right to political freedom under Australian law.

It’s possible other platforms could join the legal action set to be brought by Google on behalf of YouTube, legal sources told The Australian.

But the matter may well come to a head before Google announces any legal action, with the social media ban likely to be raised during Prime Minister Anthony Albanese’s meeting with US President Donald Trump in Washington on Tuesday morning (AEST).

At a Senate inquiry last week, Google director of government affairs and public policy Stefanee Lovett said the tech company’s US office had been briefed on a “range of issues” relating to industry discussions currently being dealt with in Australia.

“We’ve noted … that the Australian Prime Minister will be travelling to the US next week, and we’ve talked to some of our colleagues about a range of issues that we’re dealing with in Australia at the moment, so that they understand the position,” Ms Lovett said.

The US tech sector has been lobbying the Trump administration over its concerns with the Australian government’s legislative crackdown on social media platforms, as well as the proposed news media bargaining incentive, although the President’s stance on the matter has been at times hard to gauge.

However, there are fears Australia could face retaliatory action from the Trump administration if US tech companies operating here experience financial losses as a result of Australian regulations.

YouTube was initially exempt from the social ban when the federal government’s world-first legislation was passed last year with bipartisan support. But in June, eSafety Commissioner Julie Inman Grant wrote to Communications Minister Anika Wells to recommend that decision be overturned, which it subsequently was.

Last week, Ms Wells held meetings with several of the proscribed platforms, including YouTube. According to a spokesman for Ms Wells, she “reminded the platforms of the government’s expectation that there is no excuse not to enforce the under-16 social media law”.

Platforms face fines of up to $49.5m if they are found to have not taken “reasonable steps” to comply with the legislation. But young people or their families won’t face fines or penalties if they gain access to the platforms.

Ms Wells’ spokesman did not respond when asked if the government was aware of Google’s looming court challenge to the inclusion of YouTube in the ban.

Google failed to respond to repeated questions from The Australian on Sunday.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/media/googles-legal-bid-to-overturn-social-media-ban/news-story/912086fac89d986b452be8c684b89b3e

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122403

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23748341 (200847ZOCT25) Notable: Video: AUKUS expected to stay intact as Trump touts ‘great relationship’ with Albanese – The AUKUS submarine pact is expected to remain unchanged following the Trump administration’s review, with the White House describing a “great relationship” between Donald Trump and Anthony Albanese ahead of their Oval Office meeting. A US official said there were “no conversations” about withdrawing from AUKUS and praised Australia as a priority ally. The review, led by defence undersecretary Elbridge Colby, continues amid concerns over US submarine production rates. Albanese’s visit will also focus on securing a critical minerals deal to counter China’s dominance, with Ambassador Kevin Rudd saying AUKUS is “powering ahead.”

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122300

>>122367

>>122380

>>122381

>>122396

AUKUS expected to stay intact as Trump touts ‘great relationship’ with Albanese

Michael Koziol - October 20, 2025

1/2

Washington: The AUKUS submarine agreement is expected to survive the Trump administration’s review and Prime Minister Anthony Albanese will receive a warm welcome from US President Donald Trump, with the White House praising the pair’s “great relationship” ahead of Tuesday’s meeting.

It is expected that Trump will use the meeting to discuss regional efforts to combat Chinese economic coercion and military aggression, with administration officials last week challenging allies, including Australia, to help fight Beijing’s stranglehold on the global critical minerals supply chain.

A US official with knowledge of AUKUS and defence relationships, who is not authorised to speak publicly, said they did not anticipate any significant changes to the defence pact inked under former leaders Scott Morrison, the US’s Joe Biden and Britain’s Boris Johnson.

“Especially given what’s going on in China, we want our friends, like Australia, to have the resources they need to protect themselves. We need our allies,” the official told this masthead.

“It means that Australia has to be a priority. There has been no indication so far that we’d be looking to withdraw from [AUKUS]. Those are just not conversations that are happening.”

The official also noted: “The Australians have done a good job of ingratiating themselves with the president.”

In a statement to this masthead, the White House foreshadowed a warm and positive meeting between Trump and Albanese that would focus on the core interests of national and economic security.

“President Trump and Prime Minister Albanese have a great relationship, and they will discuss ways to enhance economic and defence co-operation between our two countries,” White House spokeswoman Anna Kelly said.

The rosy assessments would appear to back up a Washington Post report last month that said US Secretary of State Marco Rubio told Deputy Prime Minister Richard Marles that the AUKUS deal would continue despite the Pentagon’s “America First” review.

A report by Nikkei Asia last month also said the agreement, including the sale of at least three Virginia-class nuclear-powered submarines to Australia, had survived the review. But senior Pentagon official John Noh, the deputy assistant secretary of war for East Asia, later told the Senate the review was ongoing.

Pentagon officials could not be reached for comment on Sunday. The review has been led by undersecretary of defence for policy Elbridge Colby, a China hawk who believes in posturing US resources to focus on potential conflict in the Indo-Pacific, and who has expressed scepticism about AUKUS in the past.

Australian government figures have been increasingly confident the AUKUS review will not recommend major changes – although under the terms of the deal, the president of the day retains the ability to veto sales of the submarine if they determine the US needs them. Production of the Virginia-class boats is lagging at about 1.2 vessels a year, but needs to increase to at least 2.0 for the US to meet its commitments.

Australian ambassador to the US Kevin Rudd, who hosted an AUKUS industry summit at the embassy last week, said afterwards that the agreement was “powering ahead”.

Republican congressman Ryan Zinke, a former interior secretary in the first Trump administration, attended the summit and said the AUKUS pact was “breaking down bureaucracy and ensuring our closest allies, like Australia and the UK, get the tools they need to deter our adversaries”.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122404

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23748356 (200908ZOCT25) Notable: Video: Anthony Albanese lands in Washington DC for White House face-to-face with Donald Trump – Anthony Albanese has arrived in Washington ahead of his first in-person meeting with Donald Trump, as the White House praised their “great relationship.” The two leaders will meet in the Oval Office on Tuesday (AEDT) to discuss AUKUS, defence ties, trade and critical minerals. Albanese said the visit would “create benefits for Australians back home.” Kevin Rudd will join the delegation, with White House spokeswoman Anna Kelly confirming the talks will focus on strengthening defence and economic co-operation. Albanese will also meet the Friends of Australia Caucus, a bipartisan group of US legislators that promotes the alliance and supports closer economic and security collaboration, before hosting a BHP 140th anniversary lunch at the Australian embassy.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122300

>>122367

>>122380

>>122381

>>122396

Anthony Albanese lands in Washington DC for White House face-to-face with Donald Trump

GEOFF CHAMBERS - 20 October 2025

1/2

Anthony Albanese has arrived in the United States on the eve of his first in-person bilateral meeting with US President Donald Trump, as the White House hails the Republican billionaire’s “great relationship’’ with the Prime Minister.

Mr Albanese flew into Maryland’s Joint Base Andrews late on Sunday night local time and was greeted by heavy rain, ahead of his sit-down with Mr Trump at the White House.

The much-anticipated Oval Office meeting, which is scheduled to be held in the early hours of Tuesday (AEDT), will be attended by senior officials from both sides including former prime minister and Mr Albanese’s ambassador to the US, Kevin Rudd.

“Australia’s national interest is at the heart of everything we do. I’ve just touched down in Washington D.C. ahead of meeting with President Trump,” Mr Albanese said on X.

“We’ll work hard here to create benefits for Australians back home, from regional security to trade and investment.”

After four phone calls, a brief encounter in New York and one cancelled meeting in Canada, Mr Albanese and Mr Trump will finally come together to discuss global issues ranging across trade, defence, AUKUS, critical minerals and China.

The White House spoke positively of Mr Trump and Mr Albanese’s relationship shortly before the Labor leader landed in the US capital, highlighting defence co-operation in yet another sign the AUKUS pact will survive an ongoing Pentagon review.

“President Trump and Prime Minister Albanese have a great relationship, and they will discuss ways to enhance economic and defence co-operation between our two countries,” White House spokeswoman Anna Kelly said.

The ANZUS treaty, which was signed in 1951, the $368bn AUKUS nuclear submarine pact and other joint military-exercises will be acknowledged in the meeting as evidence of deep security links between Australia and the US.

Mr Albanese has previously said he was confident the AUKUS deal would proceed despite the Trump administration ordering a review into the Biden-era agreement, which remains ongoing.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122405

File: eef20c1513e12fb⋯.mp4 (6.68 MB,640x360,16:9,Clipboard.mp4)

File: 10c1cf039f6414e⋯.jpg (721.57 KB,1208x1952,151:244,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23748379 (200927ZOCT25) Notable: Video: RAAF military plane targeted with flares by Chinese fighter jet over South China Sea – A Chinese PLA-AF Su-35 has released flares dangerously close to an Australian RAAF P-8A Poseidon surveillance aircraft over the South China Sea, in what Canberra called an “unsafe and unprofessional” act. Deputy Prime Minister Richard Marles said no damage was done but described the incident as “dangerous.” He said the issue has been raised with Beijing and the Chinese embassy in Canberra. Defence reaffirmed Australia’s right to conduct surveillance in international airspace under the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea. It follows a similar incident in February involving a J-16 fighter, as regional tensions over airspace and navigation rights intensify.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122192

RAAF military plane targeted with flares by Chinese fighter jet over South China Sea

Josh Martin and Bryce Luff - 20 October 2025

A Chinese fighter aircraft has released flares dangerously close to an Australian military plane during another ugly encounter over the South China Sea, Canberra says.

The People’s Liberation Army–Air Force (PLA-AF) Su-35 reportedly targeted the Royal Australian Air Force (RAAF) P-8A Poseidon as it carried out surveillance on Sunday.

Deputy Prime Minister Richard Marles said the flares were “released very close” to the Australian aircraft, and it was “unsafe”.

“No damage was done, but it was dangerous,” Marles told 7NEWS.

“The majority of Australia’s trade goes through the South China Sea, so it is profoundly important that the rules operate in this area.

“Having reviewed this incident very carefully, we’ve deemed it to be both unsafe and unprofessional.

“We will continue to operate our defence force in a manner which asserts the rules-based order in the South China Sea and in international waters and international airspace.”

The issue has been raised with the Chinese embassy in Canberra and through Australia’s embassy in Beijing.

In a statement, Defence said it expects all countries, including China, to “operate their militaries in a safe and professional manner”.

“For decades, the ADF has undertaken maritime surveillance activities in the region and does so in accordance with international law, exercising the right to freedom of navigation and overflight in international waters and airspace,” Defence said.

“All maritime claims must be consistent with the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea.”

It follows a similar interaction in February, when a J-16 fighter dropped flares above and in front of a P-8A Poseidon as it conducted patrols over the same region.

Beijing said at the time it was acting to stop a “deliberate intrusion” into the airspace of China’s Xisha Islands without permission, “infringing” on its sovereignty and “endangering” national security.

“China’s measures to expel them are legitimate, legal, professional and restrained,” China’s Foreign Ministry spokesperson Guo Jiakun said.

Also in February, three Chinese warships circumnavigated Australia in a show of force the likes of which Australia has never seen from Beijing’s military.

https://7news.com.au/news/raaf-military-plane-targeted-with-flares-by-chinese-fighter-jet-over-south-china-sea-c-20410639

https://www.defence.gov.au/news-events/releases/2025-10-20/statement-unsafe-unprofessional-interaction-peoples-liberation-army-air-force

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122406

File: 9903e9bc0b1b1c2⋯.jpg (349.83 KB,814x948,407:474,Clipboard.jpg)

File: f53db80ccc21627⋯.mp4 (7.18 MB,480x480,1:1,Clipboard.mp4)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23751998 (210732ZOCT25) Notable: Donald J. Trump Truth(Video) President Trump Welcomes Australian Prime Minister to the White House - https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/115408070700605463

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122300

>>122380

>>122381

>>122396

>>122404

Donald J. Trump Truth

President Trump Welcomes Australian Prime Minister to the White House

https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/115408070700605463

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122407

File: e5c3bf071aa57c8⋯.jpg (286.81 KB,750x993,250:331,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 07db2c41da09763⋯.mp4 (8.12 MB,406x720,203:360,Clipboard.mp4)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23752000 (210735ZOCT25) Notable: Margo Martin, Special Assistant to the President Tweet: (Video) President @realDonaldTrump welcomes the Prime Minister of Australia to the White House - https://x.com/MargoMartin47/status/1980293950113202259

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122406

Margo Martin Tweet

Official White House Account - Special Assistant to the President and Communications Advisor, @realdonaldtrump

President @realDonaldTrump welcomes the Prime Minister of Australia to the White House

https://x.com/MargoMartin47/status/1980293950113202259

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122408

File: dfd870e6acd9ca7⋯.jpg (234.16 KB,750x786,125:131,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 3a6fae3baea0853⋯.jpg (1.45 MB,3000x2000,3:2,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23752005 (210737ZOCT25) Notable: The White House Tweet - President Donald J. Trump and Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese. - https://x.com/WhiteHouse/status/1980325056015397187

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122406

The White House Tweet

President Donald J. Trump and Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese.

https://x.com/WhiteHouse/status/1980325056015397187

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122409

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23752011 (210741ZOCT25) Notable: Video: President Trump welcomes the Prime Minister of Australia, Anthony Albanese, to the White House. - The White House, Oct 21, 2025

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122406

President Trump welcomes the Prime Minister of Australia, Anthony Albanese, to the White House. 🇺🇸🇦🇺

The White House

Oct 21, 2025

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CgcU9IscoRU

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122410

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23752017 (210744ZOCT25) Notable: Video: President Trump Greets the Prime Minister of the Commonwealth of Australia - The White House, Oct 21, 2025

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122406

President Trump Greets the Prime Minister of the Commonwealth of Australia

The White House

Oct 21, 2025

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cqMVlwDAfu0

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122411

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23752034 (210754ZOCT25) Notable: Video: FULL MEETING - President Trump Participates in a Bilateral Lunch with the Prime Minister of Australia - The White House, Oct 21, 2025

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122406

FULL MEETING: President Trump Participates in a Bilateral Lunch with the Prime Minister of Australia

The White House

Oct 21, 2025

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bECanjkUe84

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122412

File: 908594f96c77577⋯.mp4 (8.19 MB,640x360,16:9,Clipboard.mp4)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23752081 (210816ZOCT25) Notable: Trump praises Australia and takes swipe at Rudd during White House meeting with Albanese – (Video) Donald Trump has hailed Australia as “a fantastic place” and Anthony Albanese as “highly respected” during their first White House meeting, while delivering a blunt rebuke to ambassador Kevin Rudd, telling him, “I don’t like you either, and I probably never will.” The summit produced an $8.5 billion minerals deal aimed at countering China’s dominance and a renewed US commitment to AUKUS, with Trump confirming Australia would receive its Virginia-class submarines. US Navy Secretary John Phelan said the pact would be “improved for all three parties.” Albanese also invited Trump to visit Australia, an offer the president said he would “give serious consideration.”

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122406

Trump praises Australia and takes swipe at Rudd during White House meeting with Albanese

Riley Stuart - 21 October 2025

1/2

Donald Trump has lavished praise on Australia and Anthony Albanese during the pair's landmark meeting in Washington, saying there has "never been anybody better" to the US.

The prime minister had to wait 10 months for his first in-person bilateral meeting with the US president, but he emerged from the White House with:

• A multi-billion-dollar minerals deal designed to combat China's global dominance in the sector

• A renewed commitment from the United States to AUKUS, including confirmation Australia would get the submarines it was paying for

• The potential for Mr Trump to visit Australia

However, not everything went to plan.

Former prime minister Kevin Rudd, a former long-time Labor colleague of Mr Albanese's who is now Australia's ambassador to the US, got a trademark dressing down from Mr Trump.

Mr Rudd, who had previously been scathing of the president in a series of now-deleted social media posts, was sitting across the table from Mr Trump in the cabinet room.

When a journalist asked the commander-in-chief about the posts, Mr Trump quipped that "maybe he'd like to apologise" before looking at Mr Rudd and saying: "I don't like you either, and I probably never will."

Mr Albanese laughed off the interaction, and the meeting continued.

The ABC understands there was a subsequent, more cordial interaction between Mr Rudd and Mr Trump after the cameras left the room.

The US president described Australia as "a fantastic place" and said its PM was "highly respected" and had done a "fantastic job".

"We've been long-term, longtime allies and I would say there's never been anybody better," Mr Trump told Mr Albanese in front of the cameras.

"We fought wars together and we never had any doubts. It's a great honour to have you as my friend and a great honour to have you in the United States of America."

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122413

File: 908594f96c77577⋯.mp4 (8.19 MB,640x360,16:9,Clipboard.mp4)

File: 4b20fdb214f6d13⋯.jpg (2.02 MB,5000x3335,1000:667,Clipboard.jpg)

File: baa2e0c5e2a0885⋯.jpg (1.68 MB,5000x3333,5000:3333,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23752098 (210823ZOCT25) Notable: Video: Trump tells Rudd ‘I don’t like you’, reportedly offers forgiveness off-camera – Donald Trump publicly told Australia’s ambassador to the US, Kevin Rudd, “I don’t like you, and I probably never will” during a White House meeting with Anthony Albanese. The remark came as journalists watched, prompting laughter from the Australian delegation but calls from the opposition for Rudd’s resignation. After the meeting, Rudd apologised again and Trump reportedly accepted. The exchange followed resurfaced comments Rudd had made years earlier calling Trump “destructive” and a “traitor to the West.” Penny Wong said the exchange was “tongue in cheek,” crediting Rudd’s role in securing AUKUS and the minerals deal, while opposition leader Sussan Ley said it showed the ambassador’s position was “untenable.”

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122406

>>122412

Trump tells Rudd 'I don't like you', reportedly offers forgiveness off-camera

Jake Evans - 21 October 2025

Donald Trump has told Australia's ambassador to the US, Kevin Rudd, "I don't like you, and I probably never will" to his face.

Mr Rudd was surrounded by journalists when he received the brutal remark while sitting across from Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and Mr Trump in the White House Cabinet Room.

It was the first in-person meeting between Mr Albanese and Mr Trump.

The prime minister and Australian ministers laughed off the exchange, but the federal opposition said it was "untenable" for Mr Rudd to continue as ambassador.

His suitability for the role has been under a cloud since Mr Trump's election victory.

Despite previously calling the former prime minister "not the brightest bulb", Mr Trump indicated he did not know Mr Rudd when he was asked by a journalist whether their relationship was behind the long delay to the president finally meeting Mr Albanese.

"I don't know anything about him — if he said bad [things] maybe he would like to apologise," Mr Trump said.

Mr Trump turned to Mr Albanese to ask "did an ambassador say something bad about me?" to which Mr Albanese responded with a quiet laugh and smile.

"Don't tell me, I don't want to know," Mr Trump quickly joked.

The president then asked Mr Albanese if the man in question still worked for the government.

Mr Albanese laughed and pointed across the table at Mr Rudd.

"You said bad?" Trump then asked Mr Rudd.

Mr Rudd began to explain he had been critical before taking on the role of ambassador, when Mr Trump interrupted to say "I don't like you either".

"And I probably never will," he added, before taking more questions from journalists.

Australian officials confirmed that after the meeting Mr Rudd offered a new apology to Mr Trump, who said he was forgiven.

In March last year, Mr Trump suggested Mr Rudd may not remain as ambassador "for long" under his presidency.

He was responding to now-deleted tweets by Mr Rudd calling the president "destructive" and a "traitor to the West".

Mr Rudd's remarks had been put to Mr Trump by conservative politician Nigel Farage in an interview and, while it was not clear whether the president actually knew of Mr Rudd at the time, the issue has surrounded the ambassador since.

The Coalition has openly questioned Mr Rudd's suitability for the job and attempted to draw a link with the delay in Mr Albanese and Mr Trump meeting to Mr Rudd.

Speaking on ABC AM, Foreign Minister Penny Wong said Mr Trump's remarks to Mr Rudd were "clearly tongue in cheek".

"Kevin did an extremely good job, not only in getting the meeting, but doing the work on the critical minerals deal and AUKUS … and the success of [the] meeting reflects that work," Senator Wong said.

But Opposition leader Sussan Ley rejected the suggestion that the remarks were lighthearted.

"That's not my take-out," she told Channel Seven.

"And I'm a bit surprised that the president didn't even know who the Australian ambassador was, and that in itself tells you what the relationship is like.

"When the ambassador is the punchline of the joke and the prime minister is actually laughing at him, I think it tells you all we need to know about the fact it's probably not reasonable he continue in the role."

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-10-21/donald-trump-kevin-rudd-i-dont-like-you-albanese-meeting/105914928

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122414

File: ba9bbf616f1735b⋯.mp4 (15.81 MB,640x360,16:9,Clipboard.mp4)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23752128 (210842ZOCT25) Notable: Video: Kevin Rudd apologises to Donald Trump for ‘most destructive president’ post – Donald Trump has accepted an apology from Kevin Rudd after the Australian ambassador withdrew past comments calling him “the most destructive president” and “a traitor to the West.” During Anthony Albanese’s White House meeting, Trump joked that Rudd might “like to apologise,” then told him, “I don’t like you either. And I probably never will,” prompting laughter from both delegations. Rudd later apologised privately, and Trump said all was forgiven. Former ambassador Dennis Richardson praised Rudd’s work on the $8.5bn critical minerals deal and AUKUS, while Penny Wong called Trump’s remark “tongue-in-cheek.” Opposition leader Sussan Ley argued Rudd’s position was “untenable,” though Arthur Sinodinos said his dismissal was unlikely.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122406

>>122412

>>122413

Kevin Rudd apologises to Donald Trump for ‘most destructive president’ post

JOE KELLY and GEOFF CHAMBERS - 21 October 2025

1/2

Donald Trump has forgiven Kevin Rudd for his past criticisms but revealed he has no personal relationship with the Australian ambassador – declaring that “I don’t know anything about him” – in his first White House meeting with Anthony Albanese.

After being questioned about Dr Rudd’s disparaging remarks about him posted five years ago on social media, the US President asked if the criticism was “bad” and then suggested: “Maybe he’ll like to apologise ... Where is he? Is he still working?”

Mr Trump appeared to be unaware that Dr Rudd was seated across the table from him in the White House cabinet room after being asked about the Australian ambassador’s previous criticisms by the Australian media.

Once he was alerted to Dr Rudd’s presence at the table, the US President then asked the ambassador directly: “Is it bad?”

Dr Rudd said the criticism was made “before I took this position, Mr President”. He added: “I withdraw those statements.”

Mr Trump swiftly replied: “I don’t like you either. And I probably never will.”

However, the exchange was not without humour with the comment from Mr Trump being met with general laughter, including from Mr Albanese himself, US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth and Vice President JD Vance.

The Australian was informed that, after journalists had left the room, Dr Rudd directly told the US President “I apologise” and Mr Trump said all was forgiven for the comments Dr Rudd had made.

Former Australian ambassador to the US, Dennis Richardson, said the exchange inside the White House cabinet room between Mr Trump and Dr Rudd meant that “if anyone felt the air needed to be cleared, then it’s been cleared”.

“In point of fact, from all accounts, including his former detractors, ambassador Rudd has been doing an outstanding job in Washington,” Mr Richardson said.

“The outcome of this visit owes an enormous amount to Prime Minister Albanese. It owes an enormous lot to (Foreign Minister) Penny Wong and the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade, and overwhelmingly to ambassador Rudd.”

Mr Richardson, the former head of the Defence and Foreign Affairs departments as well as ASIO, said Dr Rudd had put his “heart and soul” into securing the $8.5bn critical minerals deal with the Trump administration.

“I think to focus in on a few throwaway comments by President Trump is simply, I think it’s a bit tacky,” he said. “And it’s missing the substantive gains that have been made.”

When Mr Trump left office in 2021, Dr Rudd posted on social media that he had been the “most destructive” president in US history and “a traitor to the west” during his first term in office.

Dr Rudd deleted the post after Mr Trump’s election in 2024, “out of respect” for the President’s office.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122415

File: d6533bce630dcb6⋯.jpg (2.2 MB,5668x3779,5668:3779,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 46da4748f8d54a1⋯.jpg (374.68 KB,750x833,750:833,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 2bc0241c2fa870a⋯.mp4 (5.41 MB,1280x720,16:9,Clipboard.mp4)

File: 2173f0eec630ddd⋯.jpg (321.06 KB,750x1144,375:572,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 1497cee35db3c8f⋯.mp4 (8.83 KB,498x278,249:139,Clipboard.mp4)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23752188 (210905ZOCT25) Notable: Video: Kevin Rudd set to remain in Washington for long haul despite Trump spat – Kevin Rudd is expected to remain as Australia’s ambassador to Washington until at least March 2027, despite Donald Trump telling him “I don’t like you either, and probably never will” during Anthony Albanese’s White House meeting. The Albanese government dismissed opposition calls for Rudd’s dismissal, saying the exchange was humorous and “all’s forgiven”. Defence Minister Richard Marles praised Rudd’s “fantastic job” securing the $8.5 billion critical minerals deal and strengthening AUKUS ties. Foreign Minister Penny Wong and former ambassadors Dennis Richardson, Kim Beazley and Arthur Sinodinos all backed Rudd’s performance. Opposition Leader Sussan Ley and trade spokesman Kevin Hogan said his position was “untenable”, arguing the ambassador’s past comments about Trump undermined relations. Albanese remains firm in his support, with Rudd “in Washington for the long haul.”

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122296

>>122406

>>122412

>>122413

>>122414

Kevin Rudd set to remain in Washington for long haul despite Trump spat

Matthew Knott and Michael Koziol - October 21, 2025

1/2

Kevin Rudd could remain in his prestigious Washington posting for another 18 months after the Albanese government shrugged off negative comments from US President Donald Trump about the ambassador and opposition calls for him to be sacked.

Trump told Rudd that he would never like him during a White House meeting with Anthony Albanese, but the prime minister treated the exchange as a joke and Australia’s US ambassador later privately apologised to Trump for his past criticisms.

“All’s forgiven,” Trump said, according to sources in the room.

Diplomatic sources said that Rudd was on a four-year posting and has the government’s enthusiastic backing, meaning his tenure in the US capital is not scheduled to end until March 2027.

Rudd’s term could be extended further if both he and the government wanted him to remain in the role.

Defence Minister Richard Marles praised Rudd for doing a “fantastic job representing Australia” and said he had played a key role in securing Albanese’s meeting with Trump.

“Our relationship with the United States is in a very good place, and our ambassador to the United States deserves his share of credit for that,” Marles said.

When asked about Rudd by a reporter, Trump appeared not to recognise him before saying: “I don’t like you either, and probably never will.”

The exchange stood out as a rare tense moment in an otherwise friendly meeting dominated by mutual praise between Albanese and Trump.

Trump signed onto a wide-ranging critical minerals agreement with Australia, endorsed the AUKUS nuclear-powered submarine pact and appeared unfazed about Australia’s level of defence spending.

Rudd has been hailed as a driving force behind the critical minerals deal and is widely acknowledged to have built strong connections with Democrats and Republicans in the US capital.

He also has a close personal relationship with Albanese.

Opposition Leader Sussan Ley said Rudd’s position in Washington had become “untenable” after the exchange and that “I don’t believe he should stay in that role”.

“It’s taken nearly a year to get this meeting, and that’s been a failure of the ambassador,” she told Sky News.

“And when the ambassador is the punchline of the joke and the prime minister is actually laughing at him, I think that tells us all we need to know about the fact that it’s probably not reasonable that he continue in the role because there are critically important issues to address.”

A government spokesperson fired back, saying: “The only person who should be worried about their job security is Sussan Ley.”

Rudd scrubbed critical comments about Trump from his online record after Trump’s election victory last year, including posts in which he said Trump was “the most destructive president in history” and a “traitor to the West”. Video subsequently emerged of Rudd describing Trump as a “village idiot” in 2021.

Rudd was appointed to his ambassadorial role in December 2022.

Foreign Minister Penny Wong defended Rudd, arguing the president’s remarks were tongue-in-cheek. “We heard the laughter,” Wong told Today. “We know that we had a very successful meeting ... He’s worked so hard on ensuring AUKUS and the delivery of the submarines in our national interest”.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122416

File: bc3677db39a7dea⋯.mp4 (4.79 MB,640x360,16:9,Clipboard.mp4)

File: ef386f1a52f872c⋯.jpg (1.61 MB,1208x2616,151:327,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23755115 (220725ZOCT25) Notable: Video: Donald Trump says critical minerals deal with Australia will produce 'so much' in race against China – Donald Trump and Anthony Albanese have announced a US–Australia Critical Minerals Framework worth up to $US8.5 billion, funding mining and refining projects to reduce reliance on China’s supply chain dominance. The first project — a gallium refinery in Western Australia — will produce 100 tonnes annually under Alcoa-Sojitz, with $US3 billion in joint investment expected in six months. Trump said the deal would deliver “so much critical minerals and rare earths you won’t know what to do with them.” Albanese called it a step toward full supply-chain partnership. The framework gives both nations ownership stakes and guaranteed offtake rights, with projects spanning multiple states, including neodymium, titanium, zircon, and graphite production.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122359

>>122360

>>122406

>>122412

Donald Trump says critical minerals deal with Australia will produce 'so much' in race against China

Jake Evans - 21 October 2025

1/2

Donald Trump and Anthony Albanese have inked a deal for "critical mineral and energy dominance" in a new partnership that will tip billions into mining projects in the US and Australia.

Under the critical minerals framework, mining companies will be able to apply for financing for projects that will produce minerals needed for weapons, electronics, renewable technologies and more.

Alongside the framework, the leaders announced financing from Australia and the US War Department for the first project under the scheme — the development of a gallium refinery in Western Australia under Alcoa-Sojitz.

That refinery is expected to produce about 100 tonnes of gallium a year.

With global demand for the computer chip material being about 700 to 750 tonnes, the move will significantly shift dependence from China, the world's biggest supplier.

Altogether the Australian and US governments intend to spend $US3 billion ($4.6 billion) in the next six months to make "immediate" investments in a pipeline of critical minerals projects in nearly every state and territory in Australia.

"We’ve been working on that for quite a while," Mr Trump said.

"About a year from now you'll have so much critical minerals and rare earths you won't know what to do with them. They'll be worth about $2."

A White House fact sheet described the framework as a plan for "achieving critical mineral and energy dominance".

Mr Albanese said the deal would take Australia's relationship with the US "to that next level".

"It's not just digging things up and exporting them, but making sure how do we have [investment] across the supply chains with our friends being able to benefit … [it] isn't just digging things up, it's also about processing," he said.

In exchange for the financing, the Australian and US governments will be able to take a stake in the ownership of those facilities, and be granted a "right of offtake", essentially guaranteeing some of the supply from those facilities will be available to Australia and the US.

Critical mineral stocks rallied in early trading following the announcement.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122417

File: 310dccbf391b42c⋯.jpg (178.48 KB,1199x800,1199:800,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 5f5aa6ef9635e5b⋯.jpg (1.4 MB,3000x1687,3000:1687,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23755125 (220737ZOCT25) Notable: Trump ends AUKUS uncertainty with firm backing for Albanese – Donald Trump has ended speculation over the future of the $368 billion AUKUS pact, pledging the US will go “full steam ahead” with the deal during his first face-to-face meeting with Anthony Albanese. Trump confirmed Australia will receive its promised nuclear-powered submarines and dismissed concerns raised by a Pentagon review led by Elbridge Colby. US Navy Secretary John Phelan said Washington was working to “improve” and “clarify” AUKUS. Trump praised Australia’s military strength and said the partnership deters China but predicted no conflict over Taiwan. Canberra has already invested $1.6 billion in AUKUS infrastructure, with US and UK submarines to begin rotating through HMAS Stirling from 2027. The pact also expands cooperation in cyber, undersea, and advanced defence technologies.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122380

>>122406

>>122412

Trump ends AUKUS uncertainty with firm backing for Albanese

Olivia Caisley - 21 October 2025

1/2

Donald Trump has effectively ended months of speculation over the future of the $368-billion AUKUS submarine pact, pledging the United States will go "full steam ahead" with the deal during his first face-to-face meeting with Anthony Albanese.

As the Pentagon reviews the merits of the trilateral defence partnership between the United States, United Kingdom and Australia, the US president publicly guaranteed Canberra would receive its promised fleet of nuclear-powered submarines, in a significant win for the Albanese government.

When asked whether Australia could count on the submarines being built and delivered under his administration, Mr Trump replied: "Oh no, they're getting them."

"There shouldn't be any more clarifications because we're just going full steam ahead building," he said.

The comments put to rest months of uncertainty fuelled by the administration's review into the deal by Under Secretary of Defense for Policy Elbridge Colby, once an AUKUS sceptic, and Mr Trump's silence on the agreement since returning to office.

Also sitting at the table for the Albanese-Trump meeting was US Secretary of the Navy John Phelan, who said Washington was working to "improve" the agreement and "clarify some of the ambiguity".

"We're looking at the AUKUS relationship and making it better for all three," Mr Phelan said.

But Mr Trump quickly stepped in to address those concerns.

"He's getting that taken care of — these are just minor details. You're going to get that taken care of right?" he said to Secretary Phelan.

"It was made a while ago and nobody did anything about it. And it was going very slowly. We do actually have a lot of submarines. We have the best submarines anywhere in the world and we're building a few more, under construction," Mr Trump said.

"Now we're starting, we have it all set, with Anthony we've worked on this long and hard and we're starting that process right now and I think it's really moving along really rapidly, very well."

For Canberra, the comments will likely be interpreted as a welcome sign of continuity given its massive investment in infrastructure expansion at HMAS Stirling and Henderson in Western Australia, where US and UK submarines will begin rotational visits from 2027.

Australia has also already handed over $1.6 billion to the US as part of the AUKUS pact.

Canberra and Washington's broader ambition under AUKUS extends beyond submarines.

The pact is intended to deepen technological integration across cyber capabilities and undersea warfare, increasing deterrence in the Indo-Pacific.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122418

File: 1972a34f28b3340⋯.jpg (240.45 KB,2047x1152,2047:1152,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 09445e08189988c⋯.jpg (265.75 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: a154c32a495d59e⋯.jpg (1.25 MB,1198x2690,599:1345,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23755139 (220749ZOCT25) Notable: Albanese channels Trump’s ‘Art of the Deal’ and ticks off list of agreements – Anthony Albanese has adopted Donald Trump’s transactional style, finalising a suite of deals at the White House across critical minerals, defence, and technology. A US–Australia critical minerals framework will see each nation invest US$1 billion in projects countering China’s control of rare earths, with early funding for Alcoa’s gallium refinery in Western Australia and the Arafura mine in the Northern Territory. Defence ties were reinforced through AUKUS, Apache helicopters, and Ghost Shark undersea drones. A new “Technology Prosperity Deal” expands cooperation in AI, quantum, and space industries, while the US hailed an expected $1.4 trillion inflow from Australian superannuation funds by 2035 as a “historic” investment in the American economy.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122406

>>122412

>>122416

>>122417

Albanese channels Trump’s ‘Art of the Deal’ and ticks off list of agreements

JACK QUAIL - October 21, 2025

1/2

Anthony Albanese has embraced Donald Trump’s “art of the deal” approach, arriving at the White House to sign a series of new agreements spanning critical minerals, defence, technology, and economic investment.

The strategy clearly resonated with the Administration, which declared “President Donald J. Trump Closes Billion-Dollar Deals with Australia,” highlighting the flurry of agreements signed by the US President and the Prime Minister in support of America’s own interests.

Critical minerals investment

Chief among these new “deals” was the establishment of a new framework to bolster the mining and processing of critical minerals – inputs essential for the production of advanced weaponry, semiconductors and electric vehicles.

The agreement, which has been months in the making and comes just days after Beijing put in strict export controls on rare earths, will see both nations invest US$1bn (A$1.5bn) each over the next six months in priority projects.

China controls 90 per cent of global refined supply in the critical minerals sector and its recent restrictions stunned the White House. The deal with Mr Albanese now gives the Trump Administration an avenue to take back the advantage.

“In about a year from now, we’ll have so much critical mineral and rare earths that you won’t know what to do with them,” Mr Trump told reporters.

One of the first projects to benefit will be a new gallium plant developed by Alcoa in Western Australia. The facility will have capacity to produce 100 tonnes annually and will operate as a joint venture between the US, Australian and Japanese governments.

Another project in line for support is the Arafura Rare Earth’s Nolans project in the Northern Territory, with the Albanese government unveiling a $153m stake in the Gina Rinehart-backed mine.

Other potential joint ventures include Northern Minerals’ heavy rare earths projects in Western Australia, RZ Resources’ light and heavy rare earths operations across New South Wales and Queensland, Graphinex’s graphite mine and battery anode facility in Queensland, and VHM’s Goschen rare earth and mineral sands project.

To support these initiatives, the White House also announced that the US Export-Import Bank had issued seven “Letters of Interest” totalling US$2.2bn for critical minerals and supply-chain security projects.

Defence co-operation

As Mr Trump urges Western allies to contribute more to counter China’s expanding military presence, the second agreement saw Australia commit to “enhanced burden sharing,” with the White House citing a series of previous investments in defence materiel.

This included Canberra’s US$1.1bn purchase of a fleet of “Ghost Shark” autonomous undersea drones announced in September, and a US$2.9bn contract for the Army’s newest Apache attack helicopters – the first of which arrived in Australia earlier this month.

The White House also highlighted Australia’s investments in US shipbuilding facilities tied to the AUKUS pact, which Mr Trump declared was going “full steam ahead” after months of uncertainty over whether his administration would stand by the alliance.

Australia’s future Joint Air Battle Management System which is designed to synchronise air and missile defence capabilities, and a separate program to manufacture longer-range munitions in Australia were also highlighted. Both initiatives will rely heavily on US industry involvement, the White House said.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122419

File: 76024a4c88426ca⋯.jpg (323.28 KB,2047x1152,2047:1152,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 89d997157ff1747⋯.jpg (313.75 KB,2047x1152,2047:1152,Clipboard.jpg)

File: b2145ccab609e4b⋯.jpg (286.59 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: c529f0fdf88400a⋯.jpg (356.11 KB,1200x1600,3:4,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23755149 (220803ZOCT25) Notable: From flowers to golf, no missteps in Albanese’s visit – Anthony Albanese’s visit to Washington unfolded as a diplomatic success, marked by warmth and smooth protocol. Donald Trump hosted the Prime Minister at Blair House, the official U.S. presidential guest residence situated opposite the White House, traditionally reserved for visiting heads of state. The gesture, accompanied by flowers from Trump and Melania, signalled goodwill before the two leaders met in the Cabinet Room alongside JD Vance, Marco Rubio and Pete Hegseth. Albanese’s team included Kevin Rudd, who drew laughter after a brief, humorous exchange with Trump over past remarks. Over a three-course lunch of roast chicken and pavlova, Trump expressed interest in becoming the first US President to visit Australia since Barack Obama, hinting at attending the 2028 Presidents Cup in Melbourne. Later, Albanese met Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and dined with Rubio.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122406

>>122412

From flowers to golf, no missteps in Albanese’s visit

GEOFF CHAMBERS - October 21, 2025

Anthony Albanese’s invitation from Donald Trump to stay at the official presidential guest residence Blair House was an early sign the first bilateral meeting between the pair was going to be a success.

With the Australian flag flying outside the historic residence across the road from the White House, Albanese was greeted on arrival with a bunch of flowers sent over from Trump and First Lady, Melania.

Original plans to host the meeting in the Oval Office were changed at the last minute to accommodate Trump’s top officials.

After Albanese was given a special tour of Trump’s renovated office and Presidential Walk of Fame, the main action took place in the West Wing Cabinet room.

Albanese was ushered to a seat next to Trump on the American side of the table that featured heavy-hitters including US Vice-President JD Vance, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio, White House chief-of-staff Susie Wiles, US Secretary of the Interior Doug Burgum and US Secretary of the Navy John Phelan.

On the opposite side of the Cabinet table was the Australian delegation, which included Albanese’s chief-of-staff Tim Gartrell, Ambassador to the US Kevin Rudd, Department of Prime Minister & Cabinet secretary Steven Kennedy, Resources Minister Madeleine King, Industry Minister Tim Ayres and the PM’s communications director Fiona Sugden.

The menu for the light working lunch was healthier than the McDonald’s cheeseburgers that Trump has been known to devour.

The three-courses included a fall green salad with sunset tomatoes and White House honey dressing, rosemary roast chicken with celery root puree, asparagus, collard greens and Dijon sauce, and a pear pavlova with candied ginger ice cream and berry compote.

Sitting opposite Trump, Rudd was on his best behaviour hoping to escape the glare of the Republican billionaire he once described as “the most destructive president in history”, “nuts” and a “traitor to the west”.

During a 40-minute pre-lunch press conference, Trump was asked about Rudd’s “nasty” comments.

Trump’s response was brutal. And Rudd couldn’t walk away from what he had said.

“Maybe he’d like to apologise,” Trump said.

He turned to a smiling Albanese and said: “Did an ambassador say something bad about me … don’t tell … where is he?”

To Rudd, he said: “You say bad?”

Rudd said: “Before I took this position, Mr President”.

Trump responded with “I don’t like you either and I probably never will”, which drew laughs from everyone at the table including Albanese.

On a lighter note, Trump said he was very keen to become the first US President to travel down under since Barack Obama in 2014.

And the obvious lure for the golf mad US President is the 2028 President’s Cup at the Kingston Heath Golf Club in Melbourne.

Albanese, who prefers tennis, might have to get some golf lessons in advance of hosting Trump for a hit around during both Australian and US election years.

Following his lunch with Mr Trump, Mr Albanese was due to meet with US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and dine with Mr Rubio.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/from-flowers-to-golf-no-missteps-in-albaneses-visit/news-story/2bf9488c4ea774e41d35a30ef899e218

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122420

File: 04bfbe903876c3d⋯.mp4 (4.99 MB,406x720,203:360,Clipboard.mp4)

File: 02fd153ee8660a3⋯.jpg (3.2 MB,3000x2000,3:2,Clipboard.jpg)

File: efbf95786fb6805⋯.jpg (3.8 MB,3000x2000,3:2,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23755163 (220821ZOCT25) Notable: Analysis: Inside Albanese’s extremely successful Trump meeting (where I was called a nasty guy)"There is no way to describe Anthony Albanese’s first proper meeting with Donald Trump as anything other than a raging success. With one glaring exception, Albanese achieved everything he came to Washington to do: he inked a landmark critical minerals deal, secured the US president’s emphatic support for the AUKUS defence pact, and shared an apparently genuine camaraderie with Trump – who called Australia 'an amazing ally'. 'There’s never been any games,' Trump enthused. 'There are some games with other countries, but there haven’t been games with Australia.' Even the awkward exchange with Kevin Rudd – when Trump said, 'I don’t like you either, and I probably never will' – seemed to clear the air. And Rudd wasn’t the only one to cop it. Trump called this reporter a 'nasty guy' when I tried to ask a second question, while he told another Australian journalist, The Nightly’s Latika Bourke, that she didn’t know anything about the Russia-Ukraine war, and then told her to be 'quiet'. Escaping the White House unscathed is a tough task. But Albanese has done it, even if others have a few scars." – Michael Koziol, The Age

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122406

>>122412

Analysis: Inside Albanese’s extremely successful Trump meeting (where I was called a nasty guy)

Michael Koziol - October 21, 2025

1/2

Washington: There is no way to describe Anthony Albanese’s first proper meeting with Donald Trump as anything other than a raging success.

With one glaring exception, Albanese achieved everything he came to Washington to do: he inked a landmark critical minerals deal, secured the US president’s emphatic support for the AUKUS defence pact, and shared an apparently genuine camaraderie with Trump - who called Australia “an amazing ally”.

“There’s never been any games,” Trump enthused at one point. “There are some games with other countries, but there haven’t been games with Australia.”

The meeting was moved at late notice from the Oval Office to the Cabinet Room, where the two leaders could sit next to each other to sign the agreement on critical minerals. Five months in the making, it is set to unlock $US8.5 billion ($13 billion) in rare earth mining and processing, including joint US-Australian projects, US projects in Australia and even multinational endeavours.

And, in the presence of War Secretary Pete Hegseth, Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Navy Secretary John Phelan, Trump emphatically committed to the AUKUS pact, including the sale of nuclear-powered submarines to Australia. In fact, Trump said the deal had been progressing too slowly, and he wants to speed it up.

On the thorny subject of defence spending, Trump went nowhere near pressing Australia to do more – even when asked about it. He said he would like all countries to do more, but “you have to do what you have to do – you can only do so much”.

He went on to praise Australia’s investments in submarine and ship infrastructure, likely a reference to the government’s recent $12 billion announcement about AUKUS-ready upgrades to the Henderson shipyard in Western Australia.

There was no immediate tariff relief in sight, with the president noting Australia already paid the lowest rate of any country. Australia maintains its position that it would like the tariffs to go, and that it supports “more trade, not more trade barriers”.

Albanese was joined at the table by Australia’s ambassador to the US, Kevin Rudd, Resources Minister Madeleine King, Industry Minister Tim Ayres, secretary of the Department of Prime Minister and Cabinet Steven Kennedy and communications director Fiona Sugden.

A relaxed Albanese began the meeting by joking about driving the 50 metres or so from his accommodation at Blair House to the White House, as is custom, rather than walking. And later he joked that some of Trump’s praise for him was so effusive he would use it in his next political ad.

Invited to compare Albanese to predecessors Scott Morrison and Malcolm Turnbull, Trump declined to do so, but said: “I think he’s doing a really good job ... They [Australia] really have a great prime minister.”

But most Trump meetings with world leaders have an awkward moment, and this was no different. Indeed, this was more awkward than most.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122421

File: 96e779236fbc066⋯.jpg (261.38 KB,750x688,375:344,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 4fe61404fd95a04⋯.mp4 (9.28 MB,720x380,36:19,Clipboard.mp4)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23755187 (220856ZOCT25) Notable: The White House Tweet: - (Video) "It's great to have the Prime Minister of Australia, a lot of friends over there… we work together very much on rare earths, critical minerals, and lots of other things." - President Donald J. Trump - https://x.com/WhiteHouse/status/1980645712099528908

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122406

>>122412

The White House Tweet

"It's great to have the Prime Minister of Australia, a lot of friends over there... we work together very much on rare earths, critical minerals, and lots of other things." - President Donald J. Trump

https://x.com/WhiteHouse/status/1980645712099528908

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122422

File: 1061961dcadc88a⋯.jpg (6.31 MB,7185x4790,3:2,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 00953f8b860676f⋯.jpg (297.12 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23755200 (220908ZOCT25) Notable: OPINION: I’ve sat with Trump in the Oval Office, and I give Albanese a 10/10"Anthony Albanese and his team, including ambassador Kevin Rudd, should be very pleased with their meeting with President Donald Trump. They achieved the main objective, which was to get in and out without mishap. Trump lavished the prime minister with praise and Albanese lavished back without appearing sycophantic. It was definitely a 10/10 in diplomatic and political terms. The agreement on rare earths development and processing is a very good step forward … but it is easier to announce deals in the White House than it is to actually make them happen. So there is much work to do. Of course, Trump loves AUKUS — he is hyper-transactional and loves a good deal. Bullshit and backslapping are fine, but delivering the goods is what matters. So far, so good." – Malcolm Turnbull, The Age

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122406

>>122412

OPINION: I’ve sat with Trump in the Oval Office, and I give Albanese a 10/10

Malcolm Turnbull, former Prime Minister - October 21, 2025

1/2

Anthony Albanese and his team, including ambassador Kevin Rudd, should be very pleased with their meeting with President Donald Trump. They achieved the main objective, which was to get in and out without mishap.

Trump lavished the prime minister with praise and Albanese lavished back without appearing sycophantic. He maintained his dignity with charm and good humour. It was definitely a 10/10 in diplomatic and political terms.

The agreement on rare earths development and processing is a very good step forward. Australia has been pressing for this for a long time. Back in February 2018, I agreed with Trump, then in his first term as president, that the United States and Australia would work together on the extraction, processing and development of rare earths and strategic minerals but until now, not much progress has been made.

Rudd’s energy will have made a big contribution. But the agreement of 2018 is a reminder that it is easier to announce deals in the White House than it is to actually make them happen. So there is much work to do, although China’s recent throttling of rare earth exports should ensure the Americans actually deliver the support they have promised this time.

There have been whoops of joy because Trump said he supported AUKUS. He also said Australia would get the nuclear submarines promised at the same time as he said America had lots of submarines and were building a few more.

Of course, he did. AUKUS is a fantastic deal for the US. As the US secretary of the navy observed in the meeting, the main game for the US is securing, at our expense, a submarine base and dockyard in Perth – further from China’s missiles than Guam and conveniently located on the Indian Ocean. And we continue to contribute $US3 billion ($4.6 billion) to the US submarine industry.

But while Trump’s warm words will cheer the credulous, they do not alter reality. The US does not have lots of attack submarines – in fact, it is about 20 short of what its navy says it needs. It is also producing about 1.1 Virginia-class submarines a year, about half as many as the two submarines a year it needs to replace its older, retiring Los Angeles-class submarines. It is common ground that before a US president could authorise the sale of any Virginia-class submarines to Australia, that production rate would need to be at least 2.3 Virginia-class submarines a year – that is, production needs to more than double.

The decision to sell Virginias to Australia won’t be taken until 2031 at the earliest. Despite many billions of extra investment, submarine production in the US has remained flat for years. Repeated predictions of an increase in production have been unfulfilled. In other words, all the risk of America being able to sell Australia submarines is borne by Australia – we have no leverage at all.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122423

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23755204 (220917ZOCT25) Notable: Video: Kevin Rudd should not be sacked after Donald Trump’s rebuke, Malcolm Turnbull insists – Malcolm Turnbull has defended Kevin Rudd’s role as Australia’s ambassador to the US, dismissing Coalition calls for his removal after Donald Trump told him, “I don’t like you, and I probably never will.” Turnbull described the exchange as “tongue-in-cheek” and said sacking Rudd would project weakness, praising Anthony Albanese’s “10 out of 10” White House performance for balancing warmth and dignity. He said Trump’s comments on China showed the US president “is not a warmonger” and wants peace, but warned that “warm words don’t build submarines,” noting America’s production shortfalls still jeopardise Australia’s AUKUS timeline. Turnbull said the meeting’s outcomes hadn’t changed the practical challenges facing the submarine deal, which requires US output to more than double before Australia can receive any vessels.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122406

>>122412

>>122422

Kevin Rudd should not be sacked after Donald Trump's rebuke, Malcolm Turnbull insists

Jacob Greber - 21 October 2025

1/2

Former prime minister Malcolm Turnbull has dismissed Coalition demands Kevin Rudd be sacked, saying Donald Trump's chiding of Australia's ambassador to the United States was "tongue-in-cheek".

Describing Anthony Albanese's long-anticipated White House performance as a "10 out of 10" in which the prime minister "lavished praise" on the US president "without appearing to be sycophantic", Mr Turnbull said the decision to include Mr Rudd in the meeting "projected strength".

"I think it would be a very bad look for Rudd to be moved now," Mr Turnbull told 7.30.

"I would think taking vengeance on Kevin Rudd would be very low on Donald Trump's priorities. And I think his rather tongue-in-cheek remarks are evidence of that."

At Tuesday's White House meeting — the first formal sit-down between the US and Australian leaders — Mr Trump told Mr Rudd, "I don't like you, and I probably never will."

The comments triggered widespread laughter in the room, with Mr Trump offering Mr Rudd an opportunity to apologise for previously having been highly critical of the president.

It is understood that he subsequently apologised to the president, who accepted.

However, the incident at the meeting prompted Opposition leader Sussan Ley to call for Mr Rudd's sacking, saying his position was untenable.

Asked about her remarks, Mr Turnbull said he understood why she may have made them.

"It's your miserable duty every day to get up and say something critical about the government, and sometimes the things you say are not particularly momentous," he said.

Trump 'not a warmonger'

Mr Turnbull also said it was notable that Mr Trump had suggested that even though the AUKUS deal could be used as a deterrent against China, it would likely not be needed for that.

Mr Trump downplayed prospects of any conflict over Taiwan, saying he got on "very well" with Chinese President Xi Jinping.

The president's remarks appear to have countered some of the more strident anti-China rhetoric of his administration, including from Secretary of War Pete Hegseth.

"The China hawks in both Canberra and Washington will be rather disappointed in what Trump said," Mr Turnbull told 7.30.

"Because what he's basically said is that the whole rationale for this massive investment in AUKUS is not actually a realistic one.

"In other words, we don't need to deter China because President Xi, filled with goodwill and bonhomie towards President Trump, is not going to contemplate any hostilities."

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122424

File: adbf5180f94407e⋯.mp4 (14.13 MB,640x360,16:9,Clipboard.mp4)

File: 9dc1afff0a0a9d3⋯.jpg (232.77 KB,1280x853,1280:853,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 90b14e2257c43e3⋯.jpg (156.66 KB,1280x853,1280:853,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23755216 (220928ZOCT25) Notable: Video: Anthony Albanese defends Kevin Rudd after criticism from Donald Trump – Anthony Albanese has reaffirmed his support for Kevin Rudd, calling him a “fantastic” ambassador after Donald Trump told Rudd, “I don’t like you either, and I probably never will.” The prime minister said the exchange ended with Mr Trump’s words, “all is forgiven,” and praised Rudd’s work in Washington, noting “every single person on The Hill” had endorsed him. Speaking at a Friends of Australia breakfast, Albanese thanked Rudd for “working his guts out” on AUKUS and US relations. Veteran Republican Michael McCaul also backed Rudd, saying he had been “there every step of the way” on the submarine pact. Albanese hailed the trip’s success, including an $8.5 billion critical minerals partnership and renewed AUKUS commitments aimed at a “more secure and peaceful Indo-Pacific region.”

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122406

>>122412

>>122413

>>122415

Anthony Albanese defends Kevin Rudd after criticism from Donald Trump

Jane Norman and Riley Stuart - 22 October 2025

Anthony Albanese has strongly endorsed his hand-picked ambassador to the United States, Kevin Rudd, seeking to draw a line under Monday's awkward encounter with Donald Trump.

Revealing he gave the US president and his wife Melania a model submarine, jewellery and "ugg-booties" for their newest grandchild, Mr Albanese declared the two-day visit to Washington DC a "success" and said his talks with Mr Trump were "positive and constructive".

While the bilateral meeting between the two leaders went smoothly, Mr Rudd inadvertently generated headlines when he was scolded by Mr Trump over past social media posts that were highly critical of the president.

Asked to respond to the now-deleted criticisms on X, Mr Trump – who at first did not realise that Mr Rudd was seated opposite him in the White House Cabinet Room – asked the ambassador: "You said bad?"

"I don't like you either, and I probably never will," Mr Trump said, prompting awkward laughter around the table.

As the media was herded out of the room, Mr Rudd could be overheard apologising directly to the president.

According to Mr Albanese, Mr Trump offered his forgiveness.

"To quote President Trump, all is forgiven," Mr Albanese told reporters in Washington DC on Tuesday, local time, shortly before flying out of the US capital.

"Kevin Rudd is doing a fantastic job as the ambassador and I've got to say, up on The Hill, every single person who we met with and the people who spoke this morning all say exactly the same thing."

Earlier, at a Friends of Australia breakfast function, Mr Albanese personally thanked Mr Rudd – a longtime political ally – for laying the groundwork for the two-day visit.

"If there's a harder working ambassador on The Hill, then please let me know, because Kevin works his guts out and he seems to know everyone," Mr Albanese told the gathering of Republican and Democratic members of Congress.

Veteran Republican Michael McCaul backed Mr Albanese, saying he was glad Mr Rudd was still "gainfully employed" and added that "Kevin was there every step of the way" on the massive AUKUS submarine agreement.

On Tuesday, Opposition leader Sussan Ley told Sky News Mr Rudd should consider his future.

Mr Rudd began his four-year term in March 2023 and Mr Albanese batted away suggestions he should be sacked.

Mr Albanese also hailed the renewed US commitment to the AUKUS defence pact.

The trilateral partnership, which will cost Australia an estimated $378 billion, has been the subject of reviews in the United Kingdom and US and has vocal critics at home.

Last year former prime minister Paul Keating told the ABC's 7.30 program it was "the worst deal in all history" and warned that persevering with it could alienate Australia from its largest trading partner, China.

The first pillar of AUKUS centres on beefing up submarine development and manufacturing capabilities across all three countries, which some analysts have warned could provoke Beijing.

But on Tuesday Mr Albanese said AUKUS was not designed to combat any one country.

"I think the AUKUS agreement is about our national security and is about a more secure and peaceful Indo-Pacific region," he said.

"I think it's a more secured region when you have a stronger presence, and that is what it's about."

Mr Albanese also lauded the multi-billion-dollar minerals deal he signed with Mr Trump at the White House on Monday, which was designed to ramp up Australia's ability to process what it dug out of the ground.

At the moment China dominates that global supply chain.

"Australia and the United States will provide a combined $3 billion towards an $8.5 billion future pipeline of priority critical minerals projects in Australia and that is just already what we have identified," Mr Albanese said on Tuesday.

"We see this as just the start, not the end."

Mr Albanese said he spent about three hours with Mr Trump on Monday, local time, and had discussions with other key stakeholders in the US government, including Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Vice-President JD Vance, who delayed a trip to the Middle East to meet Australia's delegation.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-10-22/albanese-defends-kevin-rudd-after-donald-trump-criticisms/105919238

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122425

File: d7880aef7d2d951⋯.jpg (175.49 KB,2000x1125,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: d23a9787c0e190a⋯.jpg (196.21 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: c0c726faf472229⋯.jpg (193.99 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23755221 (220936ZOCT25) Notable: ‘Kevin works his guts out’: PM endorses Rudd’s contributions – (Video) Anthony Albanese has confirmed Kevin Rudd will remain Australia’s ambassador to Washington through the 2026 US midterms, praising him as an “outstanding” and “extraordinarily hard-working” representative. At a Friends of Australia caucus and a BHP anniversary event, Albanese said Rudd “works his guts out” and credited him for the visit’s success. Senior sources said Rudd helped secure Julian Assange’s release, progress AUKUS legislation and deliver the $8.5 billion critical minerals deal with the Trump administration. Republican co-chair Michael McCaul said “Kevin was there every step of the way” on AUKUS, while joking about his exchange with Mr Trump. Albanese described his own rapport with the US president as “warm” and “constructive”, reflecting the alliance’s strength.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122406

>>122412

>>122413

>>122415

>>122424

‘Kevin works his guts out’: PM endorses Rudd’s contributions

JOE KELLY - 22 October 2025

1/2

Anthony Albanese has endorsed Kevin Rudd to stay as his Washington ambassador through to next year’s US midterm elections and beyond, ending speculation about the former prime minister’s future and securing him as Labor’s key conduit on AUKUS and critical minerals.

The Prime Minister used two public events in Washington to shower praise on the ambassador and credited him for the success of his visit.

Speaking to about 40 people at a Friends of Australia caucus event, which included both Republican and Democratic members of congress, Mr Albanese said: “I want to personally thank him for the work that (Dr Rudd) does. If there’s a harder-working ambassador on The Hill, then please let me know because Kevin works his guts out and he seems to know everything.”

There are a range of potential candidates who could replace the 68-year-old, but Dr Rudd’s decision to own up to critical comments of Donald Trump and take accountability for prior actions won respect from the US President, who told him all was forgiven following a 40-minute press conference in the White House cabinet room.

The decision to keep Dr Rudd in place for his allocated term gives Mr Albanese extra time to find a replacement, as he also considers who might follow Stephen Smith in London.

Speculation is growing in defence circles that Defence secretary Greg Moriarty could be tapped to replace Mr Smith, the former Labor defence and foreign minister, when his term in Britain expires in January.

Like the position of ambassador to the US, the top UK posting has traditionally gone to a political appointee, but a number of career public servants have occupied the role in the past.

Mr Moriarty’s candidacy is reinforced by his detailed knowledge of the AUKUS program, which would be a major advantage in the London post as the submarine partnership gets under way.

Former national intelligence boss Andrew Shearer has also recently been announced as Australian ambassador to Japan.

Mr Shearer will head to a Tokyo that has turned sharply right with the elevation of Sanae Takaichi, Japan’s first woman Prime Minister and an ultraconservative China hawk who will likely seek deeper defence ties with Western allies.

In Washington, Mr Albanese used an address to BHP’s 140th anniversary lunch reception at the Australian embassy again to praise Dr Rudd’s efforts in advancing the critical minerals deal.

“It is absolutely the case that there is no harder-working (ambassador), because it is not possible to work harder than Kevin Rudd does,” Mr Albanese said.

“His engagement with people across the congress and across the US administration is quite extraordinary. And the respect that he has held is a product of that.

“He is an outstanding Australian representative, and it says something about – as I said to President Trump yesterday – said something about the importance that we place in the relationship with the United States that a former prime minister is their ambassador here. It’s something that isn’t the norm.

“It’s something that certainly Kevin didn’t need to do. But it was a part of his service to Australia. I thank you today very much publicly … The success of this visit is down to your hard work.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122426

File: 21054851159225c⋯.jpg (2.06 MB,3000x2000,3:2,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 89af39f751d728e⋯.jpg (4.8 MB,3000x2001,1000:667,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23755234 (220951ZOCT25) Notable: ‘I’m alive’: Rudd bounces back from Trump spray – After Donald Trump’s public rebuke in the White House Cabinet Room, Kevin Rudd quickly reasserted his diplomatic footing on day two of Anthony Albanese’s Washington visit. At a Friends of Australia breakfast at Blair House — attended by bipartisan US lawmakers including Michael McCaul and Tim Kaine — Rudd joked “I’m alive” and received applause for his role advancing AUKUS and critical minerals cooperation. McCaul praised that “Kevin was there every step of the way.” Later, at BHP’s 140th anniversary embassy lunch, Rudd earned plaudits from Albanese and Interior Secretary Doug Burgum for his tireless advocacy and bipartisan outreach. Albanese called him “an outstanding Australian representative” whose “hard work” underpinned the visit’s success.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122406

>>122412

>>122413

>>122415

>>122424

‘I’m alive’: Rudd bounces back from Trump spray

Day one of Anthony Albanese’s visit to Washington revealed that ambassador Kevin Rudd lacks a line to the White House, but on day two he showed off the connections he has been more successful in nurturing.

Jessica Gardner - Oct 22, 2025

1/2

Washington | For Kevin Rudd, day two of his highly scrutinised management of Prime Minister Anthony Albanese’s White House visit must have been like returning to the harbour after a storm.

From the turbulent seas of the White House cabinet room on Monday, where US President Donald Trump’s rebuke of the Australian ambassador to the US was the only awkward moment in an otherwise warm and jovial meeting.

Then, to a much friendlier, calmer port on Tuesday, as Rudd introduced Albanese, Resources Minister Madeleine King (“captain mining,” the ambassador told the crowd) and Industry Minister Tim Ayres to US politicians in his popular caucus group.

Monday’s scolding from Trump over past tweets, complete with a trolling declaration that “I don’t like you - and I never will” was undoubtedly embarrassing. Still, Rudd, in ever-diligent diplomat mode, was soldiering on the following morning.

“I’m alive,” he told The Australian Financial Review with a smile as he worked the room.

As the opposition raged back at home with questions over how the Albanese government could continue with an ambassador who so clearly lacks a line to the White House, Rudd showed off the connections he has been much more successful in building.

The former prime minister, who has been in Washington as Australia’s ambassador since March 2023, had managed to pull together a high-powered, bipartisan room of at least two dozen US House Representatives and Senators to meet Albanese for breakfast.

And they were happy to see the ambassador. “I’m glad you’re still gainfully employed,” said Republican representative Michael McCaul in some opening remarks, in a nod to Rudd’s bruising encounter the day before with the mercurial president.

The crowd met the quip with sympathetic laughs, underlining how everyone in Washington understands the treacherous terrain that can come from a meeting with Trump.

McCaul is the co-chair, along with Democrat Joe Courtney, of the Congressional Friends of Australia caucus, a group of about 90 US politicians with whom Rudd and his embassy team nurture relationships. Other congressional allies were there too, including Tim Kaine, a senator from Virginia, who has shipbuilding yards in his jurisdiction building submarines for the AUKUS pact, and a handful from mining and resources states curious to know more about the just-inked $13 billion critical minerals pact.

Albanese talked up the decades-long military alliance between the two countries, and the burgeoning industrial co-operation on commodities crucial to defence, renewable energy and consumer gadgets.

The prime minister said that strengthening the bilateral alliance was a priority, and that he did not take Congress support for the AUKUS security pact for granted. Another $US1 billion payment to bolster US shipyards was “on its way before Christmas”, he promised.

On both issues, the threat is China, as growing military force in the Indo-Pacific and as a price-setter with its control of critical minerals processing. Interesting then, that it is on the issue of great power competition between the US and China, and Australia’s role in the middle, that Rudd is so sought after for his views in political and diplomatic circles. In this way, the Mandarin speaker and China specialist is a huge foreign policy asset for Australia, even if he is a unique character.

In opening remarks, Rudd thanked the caucus for backing up his advocacy in 2023 and 2024 to get bills passed that were critical to advancing the AUKUS nuclear submarine pact. “We have one of the largest friendship caucuses in the Congress. But these things don’t work unless those of you who are in the Senate and the House make it work,” he said. “Thank you from the bottom of our hearts. Because without you, it would not be possible.”

McCaul backed his work ethic, saying “Kevin was there every step of the way.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122427

File: f65f659f056e537⋯.jpg (179.92 KB,1200x720,5:3,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23755241 (221000ZOCT25) Notable: Trump meets Albanese, nailing down rare earth deal; move cannot change supply landscape soon due to refinery bottleneck: expert"US President Donald Trump met visiting Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese on Monday at the White House, nailing down a rare earth agreement, but Chinese observers noted the deal cannot shake China's dominant status in supply chain in short term, as the thorny issue is advanced refining technologies rather than reserves. Yu Lei, a professor from the Department of International Politics and Economics at Shandong University, told the Global Times on Tuesday that the core issue behind the rare earth and critical mineral agreement signed by the US and Australia lies in technology rather than resources ... Yu warned, 'first is the market issue — its rare earth products lack sufficient export markets, and US domestic demand is far from enough to absorb Australia's production capacity; second is the technological bottleneck — there is still sufficient gap for Australia to meet the requirements for high-purity refining.' Chen Hong, a professor and director of the Australian Studies Centre at East China Normal University, described Albanese's Washington visit as 'Band-Aid diplomacy' with the US; however, Australia should also bear in mind the big picture and long-term interests for itself. 'Being the US ally should not be at the expense of stability in Asia-Pacific,' the expert said." – Zhang Han and Ma Tong, The Global Times

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122405

>>122406

>>122412

Trump meets Albanese, nailing down rare earth deal; move cannot change supply landscape soon due to refinery bottleneck: expert

Zhang Han and Ma Tong - Oct 21, 2025

1/2

US President Donald Trump met visiting Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese on Monday at the White House, nailing down a rare earth agreement, but Chinese observers noted the deal cannot shake China's dominant status in supply chain in short term, as the thorny issue is advanced refining technologies rather than reserves.

The White House also made vague promises on AUKUS which Canberra cheered for, yet analysts reminded that Canberra may miss the big picture and suffer long-term losses if keeps being a staunch ally of the US.

Framework agreement

The two leaders signed a rare earth minerals agreement, which will see $1 billion in investments from the US and Australia over the next six months to get started on projects "immediately," BBC reported.

In his opening remarks, the US president said that the US and Australia will be signing an agreement on critical minerals and rare earths - a key objective for the US as it seeks to move away from dependence on China. Without revealing any details about that deal, he claimed that within a year, "we'll have so critical minerals and rare earths that you won't know what to with them," per BBC.

The signing of the critical minerals deal was seen as a major strategic win by Australia, reported the Guardian.

A framework agreement circulated by the Australian government said it would see the two countries work together on "coordinated investment to accelerate development of diversified, liquid, fair markets for critical minerals and rare earths." The agreement says they will work together on mining and processing, including mobilizing government and private sector support through guarantees, loans, or equity and offtake arrangements, said the Guardian report.

Both the US and Australia are interested in expanding processing capacity outside of China, but doing so is expected to require significant investment, including on the part of government, according to BBC.

Asked to comment on an agreement on critical minerals targeting China, signed by the US and Australia, Chinese Foreign Ministry Spokesperson Guo Jiakun said on Tuesday that the global industrial and supply chains came into shape as a result of the choices of the market and businesses.

"Countries with critical mineral resources need to play a positive role in keeping relevant industrial and supply chains safe and stable and to ensure normal trade and economic cooperation," Guo said.

Yu Lei, a professor from the Department of International Politics and Economics at Shandong University, told the Global Times on Tuesday that the core issue behind the rare earth and critical mineral agreement signed by the US and Australia lies in technology rather than resources.

Rare earth resources are not in short supply globally; the real challenge is the extremely high technical threshold for rare earth purification. China is one of the countries mastering the most advanced technology in this high-precision purification technology and achieved large-scale industrial production while also maintaining advantage in cost control, according to Yu.

Australia has actively responded to the US call in terms of policies, however, Australia also faces two practical dilemmas, Yu warned, "first is the market issue—its rare earth products lack sufficient export markets, and US domestic demand is far from enough to absorb Australia's production capacity; second is the technological bottleneck—There is still sufficient gap for Australia to meet the requirements for high-purity refining.

The cooperation between the US and Australia cannot shake China's dominant position in the rare earth supply chain in the short term, but reminds China of necessity to accelerate the layout and reserve of critical metal resources on a global scale, Yu noted.

The deal came amid the US' eager move to decrease dependence on Chinese rare earths. After China announced rare earth export control measures, US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent recently called on US allies to "work together to de-risk and diversify our supply chains away from China as quickly as possible."

In response, Chinese Foreign Ministry said on October 16 that Chinese competent authorities have stated on multiple occasions China's position on the export control measures on rare earths. China's export control measures are consistent with international practice and are taken to better safeguard world peace and regional stability, and to fulfill China's non-proliferation and other international obligations, spokesperson Lin Jian said at a press briefing.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122428

File: 4eda547de17e5f5⋯.mp4 (15.7 MB,720x406,360:203,Clipboard.mp4)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23755255 (221011ZOCT25) Notable: Video: China hits back at Australia’s protest after PLA jet releases flares close to RAAF aircraft over South China Sea – China has accused Australia of “illegally intruding” into its airspace after a Royal Australian Air Force (RAAF) P-8A Poseidon patrol aircraft was approached by a Chinese Su-35 fighter jet that released flares nearby over the South China Sea. People’s Liberation Army (PLA) Senior Colonel Li Jianjian said Chinese forces were dispatched to “track, monitor, take countermeasures and warn off the aircraft,” warning that the Australian move “seriously violated China’s sovereignty.” Deputy Prime Minister Richard Marles said the Australian patrol had acted lawfully and that the incident was “unsafe and unprofessional,” prompting a diplomatic protest in Beijing. It was the second such confrontation this year.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122405

>>122427

China hits back at Australia’s protest after PLA jet releases flares close to RAAF aircraft over South China Sea

The spokesperson said Chinese naval and air forces were deployed to ‘track, monitor, take countermeasures and warn off the aircraft’.

Demi Huang and Bryce Luff - 21 Oct 2025

China has hit back after Australia’s diplomatic protest over a Chinese fighter jet releasing flares close to an Australian military plane over the South China Sea.

The Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) accused Australia of “illegally intruding” into its airspace in a statement issued on Monday.

“On October 19, an Australian P-8A military aircraft illegally intruded the airspace over China’s Xisha Islands without the approval of the Chinese government,” said Senior Colonel Li Jianjian from the PLA’s Southern Theatre Command.

He said Chinese naval and air forces were deployed to “track, monitor, take countermeasures and warn off the aircraft” in accordance with laws and regulations.

“The Australian move seriously violated China’s sovereignty and could have easily triggered maritime and aerial accidents,” Li said.

“We sternly warn the Australian side to immediately stop such provocative moves. The theatre forces remain on high alert at all times and will resolutely safeguard national sovereignty, security, and regional peace and stability.”

The response came after Deputy Prime Minister Richard Marles said on Monday that Australia had lodged a diplomatic protest with Beijing, describing the encounter as “unsafe and unprofessional.”

Marles said the Australian P-8 surveillance plane was conducting a routine patrol over the South China Sea when a PLA Su-35 fighter jet released flares, two of them “very close” to the Australian plane.

“No damage was done, but it was dangerous,” Marles told 7NEWS.

“The majority of Australia’s trade goes through the South China Sea, so it is profoundly important that the rules operate in this area.

“Having reviewed this incident very carefully, we’ve deemed it to be both unsafe and unprofessional.

“We will continue to operate our defence force in a manner which asserts the rules-based order in the South China Sea and in international waters and international airspace.”

In a statement, Defence said it expects all countries, including China, to “operate their militaries in a safe and professional manner”.

“For decades, the ADF has undertaken maritime surveillance activities in the region and does so in accordance with international law, exercising the right to freedom of navigation and overflight in international waters and airspace,” the statement said.

“All maritime claims must be consistent with the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea.”

It follows a similar interaction in February, when a J-16 fighter dropped flares above and in front of a P-8A Poseidon as it conducted patrols over the same region.

Beijing said at the time it was acting to stop a “deliberate intrusion” into the airspace of China’s Xisha Islands without permission, “infringing” on its sovereignty and “endangering” national security.

“China’s measures to expel them are legitimate, legal, professional and restrained,” China’s Foreign Ministry spokesperson Guo Jiakun said.

Also in February, three Chinese warships circumnavigated Australia in a show of force the likes of which Australia has never seen from Beijing’s military.

https://7news.com.au/news/china-hits-back-at-australias-protest-after-pla-jet-releases-flares-close-to-raaf-aircraft-over-south-china-sea-c-20418239

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122429

File: f6fc9234adef6c9⋯.jpg (183.51 KB,2048x1303,2048:1303,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 644974fdd1b5ef0⋯.jpg (382.42 KB,2000x1334,1000:667,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23759574 (230929ZOCT25) Notable: ‘Here for the long term’: US seeks to entrench presence in Australia under AUKUS – Senior US officials are expected to seek ongoing use of HMAS Stirling naval base in Western Australia under a Pentagon review of the AUKUS pact, deepening American military access as it prepares for potential conflict with China. The review, led by Elbridge Colby, may formalise a rotational presence of up to four US nuclear-powered submarines and 1,000 personnel from 2027, under Submarine Rotational Force–West. The base’s proximity to the Indian Ocean gives the US strategic reach beyond Hawaii. Defence expert Mike Pezzullo said the US “has long coveted the idea of an operating location like this and they are not going to want to give it up.”

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122380

>>122412

>>122417

>>122427

‘Here for the long term’: US seeks to entrench presence in Australia under AUKUS

Matthew Knott - October 23, 2025

1/2

Australian officials are preparing for the United States to seek ongoing use of the nation’s biggest naval base as part of the Pentagon’s secretive review into the AUKUS pact – a move that would help project American power across the Indo-Pacific as it prepares for a possible conflict with China.

US Navy Secretary John Phelan attracted attention during a White House meeting between President Donald Trump and Prime Minister Anthony Albanese on Tuesday by saying that the US wanted to clear up areas of “ambiguity” in the original AUKUS plan.

Trump expressed strong support for AUKUS and the plan to sell at least three nuclear-powered submarines to Australia, but some changes are expected following a review led by senior Pentagon official Elbridge Colby, which is due by the end of the year.

Official language about the original AUKUS plan has been vague, leaving open the possibility the regular US and UK visits could wind down when Australia acquires its own nuclear-powered submarines from the early 2030s.

Senior Australian officials said they were unsure exactly what ambiguities Phelan was referring to but believed one likely possibility was entrenching the presence of up to four US nuclear-powered submarines at HMAS Stirling, near Perth, from 2027.

The location, which serves as the home base for most of Australia’s frigates and submarines, is strategically significant for the US given it is closer to important Asian countries than the US Pacific fleet headquarters in Hawaii and expands its ability to compete with China for influence in the Indian Ocean.

Up to 1000 American troops and their families are set to be posted to Perth to support the project, known as Submarine Rotational Force West (SRF-West), making it the second-largest US military footprint in Australia following Darwin.

During the White House meeting, Phelan said the rotational force was “very important to our ability to project power in the Indo-Pacific”, highlighting its importance to American military planning.

Speaking to reporters before departing Washington D.C, Albanese said he was aware of some changes the US was seeking to make to AUKUS but would not pre-empt any announcements.

“What we do is we work things through in an orderly way,” he said.

The government was delighted by Trump’s enthusiastic comments about AUKUS and believed it would be able to work with any recommendations made by the Colby review.

Former senior defence official Mike Pezzullo said he believed bedding down the US Navy’s presence in Western Australia was one of the most likely ambiguities that Phelan had in mind.

“Our government tends to emphasise that Force West is about building up our own submarine capability, but when the Americans talk about it, they are explicit that it’s about power projection,” said Pezzullo, a former head of the Home Affairs Department who authored the 2009 defence white paper.

“They have long coveted the idea of an operating location like this and they are not going to want to give it up.”

Pezzullo said the US could also be seeking to establish more certainty about Australia’s operational role in possible conflict scenarios and may consider partnering with Australia and the UK on a trilateral next-generation submarine.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122430

File: 2f99a88b26fbdb6⋯.jpg (146.51 KB,1280x720,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 9c5e82eabd62bf6⋯.jpg (255.89 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 092880d21349a97⋯.jpg (532.35 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23759580 (230938ZOCT25) Notable: Defence orders brutal budget cuts as AUKUS and frigate costs soar – Defence chiefs have ordered sweeping cost reductions as the soaring expense of AUKUS submarines and Hunter-class frigates strains the budget. Air Force Chief Stephen Chappell has directed reviews to “mitigate overspending,” including delaying projects, cutting maintenance, and reducing aircraft flying hours, while Chief of Defence David Johnston has capped reservist workdays at 150. The navy’s frigates now cost $5.9bn per ship, rising to $9bn with design costs, and AUKUS will consume $3.3bn this year alone. Analysts warn the austerity drive risks “sacrificing existing capabilities” to fund future ones, leaving Australia’s defence readiness dangerously stretched despite government claims of record spending.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122380

>>122412

>>122417

>>122427

>>122429

Defence orders brutal budget cuts as AUKUS and frigate costs soar

BEN PACKHAM - 22 October 2025

1/2

Defence is being ordered to delay projects, slash maintenance costs and cut workforce spending in a severe austerity drive, as the ­soaring costs of nuclear sub­marines and new shipbuilding programs undermine the nation’s readiness for conflict.

Days after Donald Trump declared “full steam ahead” for the AUKUS pact, the Australian can reveal the Chief of the Air Force, Stephen Chappell, has initiated ­reviews of capability and sustainment costs as part of a service-wide push to “mitigate overspending” and “address budget challenges”.

In a separate edict, Chief of the Defence Force David Johnston has capped the number of days ADF reservists can work at 150 a year, down from 200.

The directives come despite the Albanese government’s claim to be making “the biggest peacetime increase in Australia’s defence spending” on record, and warnings by Defence officials of a heightened risk of conflict in the next five years.

In his meeting with Anthony Albanese in Washington this week, the US President provided a ringing endorsement of the AUKUS pact and gave the Prime Minister a pass on lifting defence spending from its current 2 per cent of GDP to the 3.5 per cent he had demanded of other allies.

“I’d always like more, but they have to do what they have to do. You can only do so much,” Mr Trump said.

The presidential reprieve comes amid defence industry warnings that new weapons and equipment procurements are being slowed or cancelled as the government focuses on a small number of big-ticket capabilities including the $368bn AUKUS submarine program.

Air Marshal Chappell said in a recent directive to personnel, obtained by The Australian, that a review of “capability priorities” would be undertaken to guide air force investments and “ensure in-year affordability”. “This may include project delays, scope reductions and divestments,” Air Marshal Chappell said.

A second review would examine “sustainment priorities”, with the service chief flagging cuts to aircraft flying hours through ­“reduction in rates of effort”. He said a “reduction in operational platforms/systems” was also under consideration.

“Air force must continue to ­implement measures to optimise ways of working, reduce cost and ensure every dollar spent focuses on delivering air force’s contribution to the integrated, focused force,” Air Marshal Chappell said.

At the same time, new figures provided to the Senate have put the cost of the navy’s troubled Hunter-class frigates at $5.9bn per ship – about four times the cost of one of the US’s workhorse Arleigh Burke destroyers. When design work and other program costs are included, the price of each vessel rises to an astonishing $9bn.

AUKUS costs are also ballooning, with the May budget revealing the submarine program will consume more than $3.3bn of taxpayers’ funds this financial year – nearly a decade before the first of Australia’s promised Virginia-class boats is due to enter service.

The Albanese government has pledged to increase the defence budget by $5.7bn over the next four years, and $57bn over the decade. The figure will be bolstered by a promised $12bn towards upgrades to Western Australia’s Henderson shipbuilding precinct.

But defence spending will rise by just $770m in 2025-26 and $730m the following year, according to the budget papers, requiring belt-tightening across the force.

Former defence official Marcus Hellyer, a longtime defence budget analyst, said it was curious to see the government claiming record defence spending when it was “talking about parking air planes”.

Dr Hellyer said that despite the government’s long-term funding promises, it was still sticking closely to the funding line set by the former Coalition government.

“We’re four years into the Albanese government’s tenure and all of the real, meaningful increases to the defence budget that they talk about are still out in the future,” he said. “To say there are record increases to the defence budget I think is not completely accurate.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122431

File: b5ffd13f1018340⋯.jpg (113.58 KB,1280x720,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 0e8d5cfb7473f4b⋯.jpg (355.58 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23759585 (230953ZOCT25) Notable: Solomon Islands ‘anti-Beijing warrior’ Daniel Suidani dies – Former Malaita premier Daniel Suidani, a leading critic of China’s influence in the Pacific, has died in hospital in Honiara. Known for banning Chinese companies from his province and opposing the Solomon Islands’ 2019 diplomatic switch from Taiwan to Beijing, Suidani was ousted in 2023 for refusing to accept the “one China” policy but later reinstated by the High Court. He had recently vowed to reclaim leadership, declaring “I still have the support of the people.” Suidani condemned China’s “Fengqiao Experience” policing model in Malaita, calling it an intrusion on Melanesian culture. His death is seen as a major loss for Australia’s regional allies critical of Beijing’s expansion.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122201

>>122314

>>122315

Solomon Islands ‘anti-Beijing warrior’ Daniel Suidani dies

STEPHEN RICE - October 21, 2025

Australia has lost one of its most influential friends in the Pacific with the death of outspoken Solomon Islands leader Daniel Suidani, a strident anti-Beijing warrior and a powerful voice against the rise of China in the region.

The former premier of Malaita, Solomon Islands’ largest province, rose to international prominence when he banned Chinese companies from entering the province, putting him in open conflict with the pro-Beijing central government of Solomon Islands.

Suidani died in hospital in Honiara on Tuesday, his death announced by his friend and former political adviser Celsus Talifu.

Although the cause of death has not been revealed, Suidani had been diagnosed in 2021 with a suspected brain lesion, for which he had received treatment in Taiwan - a move the Solomon Islands government described at the time as “unauthorised”.

Suidani had been a fierce critic of his country’s diplomatic switch from Taiwan to China in 2019

The former school teacher believed the values of the Chinese Communist Party were irreconcilable with those of Solomon Islands and corrosive of democracy – a heretical stance that led to his dismissal from office in February 2023 for refusing to accept the country’s “one China” policy.

In elections last year the popular Suidani was swept back into the Assembly and in March this year, the High Court declared his earlier disqualification illegal. He was still fighting what were widely viewed as trumped up charges of inciting riots.

The defiant Suidani was determined to become Premier again, telling The Australian three weeks ago that he planned to file a no-confidence motion in the provincial government, declaring: “I still have the support of the people in the province.”

Suidani was appalled that Chinese police in Malaita had been allowed to introduce the “Fengqiao Experience”, a so-called “community policing” system that requires citizens to keep tabs on each other and enables Chinese officials to fingerprint the population.

Suidani told The Australian he would throw out the dob-in-a-neighbour system if he regained power in the province.

“You cannot just come into our community like an intruder and start doing things without saying why you are coming,” he said. “We should not change the Melanesian culture we use to live because we still own this place.”

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/solomon-islands-antibeijing-warrior-daniel-suidani-dies/news-story/285e809171fbb1c5e40e7f44c40274ad

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122432

File: efde2e4796c3e99⋯.jpg (411.88 KB,1950x1097,1950:1097,Clipboard.jpg)

File: a5f987a8b4006e7⋯.jpg (505.2 KB,2048x2730,1024:1365,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 6d822dff98fa72a⋯.jpg (248.64 KB,1080x1440,3:4,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23759587 (230957ZOCT25) Notable: Brittany Higgins abandons Linda Reynolds defamation appeal – Brittany Higgins has withdrawn her appeal against a judgment that she defamed former Liberal minister Linda Reynolds, leaving in place a $340,000 damages order and legal costs that could exceed $2 million. The decision ends her bid to delay bankruptcy proceedings launched by Ms Reynolds, who is seeking access to Ms Higgins’ compensation trust. Justice Paul Tottle found Ms Higgins made “objectively untrue and misleading” statements about a political cover-up of her alleged rape and ordered her to pay 80 per cent of Ms Reynolds’ legal costs. Ms Higgins’ partner, David Sharaz, has also been pursued for bankruptcy after separate damages and cost orders in Ms Reynolds’ favour.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122229

>>122232

>>122270

>>122348

>>122377

Brittany Higgins abandons Linda Reynolds defamation appeal

STEPHEN RICE - October 21, 2025

Brittany Higgins has dropped her appeal against the court judgment that she defamed former Liberal minister Linda Reynolds, abandoning her attempt to ward off a $340,000 damages award and legal costs that could reach $2m.

Ms Higgins filed the appeal in the West Australian Supreme Court a month ago, on the last day she was legally able to do so and, coincidentally, the same day she accepted service of the bankruptcy notice Ms Reynolds had been ­attempting to serve on her.

Ms Higgins lodged a notice of discontinuance with the court on Tuesday.

The appeal had threatened to delay the bankruptcy proceedings, and any hope Ms Reynolds had that she might quickly recover any of the damages or massive costs she has incurred.

West Australian Supreme Court judge Paul Tottle in August found Ms Higgins had defamed Ms Reynolds through a series of social media posts, awarding the one-time defence minister $340,000 in damages and ­interest.

Justice Tottle also ordered Ms Higgins to pay 80 per cent of Ms Reynolds’ legal costs.

He found Ms Higgins had made “objectively untrue and misleading statements” when she first went public with her allegations that Ms Reynolds had engaged in a cover-up of her alleged rape.

The former senator filed bankruptcy proceedings against Ms Higgins in a bid to gain access to a “protective trust” that holds whatever remains of the $2.4m her former staffer received in her compensation payout from the Albanese government.

Ms Higgins has incurred hefty legal expenses of her own in defending the defamation claim, while the French home she purchased after the payout was sold at a loss just over a year later. Her wedding to partner David Sharaz is estimated to have cost six figures, and the pair have made a number of overseas trips while also renting an apartment on the Gold Coast.

Mr Sharaz has also been hit with bankruptcy proceedings after the WA Supreme Court ordered him to pay the former senator $92,000 in damages plus legal costs estimated at as much as $500,000.

The award came despite Mr Sharaz’s attempt to bow out of the proceedings, saying he could not afford to pay legal costs.

Ms Reynolds was forced to file an application for the substituted service of a bankruptcy notice after being unable to personally serve the bankruptcy notice on Mr Sharaz.

“Mr Sharaz, Ms Higgins and their associates have long adopted a strategy of driving up my legal costs so this conduct comes as no surprise to me,” Ms Reynolds said. “Despite these tactics, I remain resolute in seeing this through to the end.”

A bankruptcy declaration could open a path for Ms Reynolds to secure a portion of Mr Sharaz’s future earnings.

Mr Sharaz works alongside Ms Higgins as a director of Sydney public relations firm Third Hemisphere. The couple announced the birth of their first child in March.

Justice Tottle made damning findings about Ms Higgins’ claim that there had been a political cover-up of the rape allegations, noting it was a vital part of Ms Higgins’ story but that it had not occurred.

Justice Tottle ruled that Ms Higgins should pay 80 per cent of Ms Reynolds’ bills and that an early settlement offer – tabled four days before the trial was scheduled to begin – could not be considered reasonable.

The offer included a “mutual statement of regret” that would have led to Ms Reynolds acknowledging Ms Higgins believed she was not given appropriate support after being allegedly raped in Parliament House.

Justice Tottle found the mutual statement “fell short of an apology by a substantial margin”.

“The plaintiff’s characterisation of it as a statement to the effect the parties have agreed to disagree is accurate,” he wrote.

“As appears to have been the defendant’s intention, the mutual statement would have conveyed the defendant maintained the truth of the defamatory statements made by her.”

While total legal costs incurred by Ms Reynolds in bringing the defamation action are unknown, she said publicly in the wake of last month’s win that she had spent “millions” on the matter and had mortgaged her house to pay legal bills.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/brittany-higgins-abandons-linda-reynolds-defamation-appeal/news-story/4e16a729c4ecc11fd3249c42778835b2

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122433

File: c4b788ca84248c7⋯.jpg (2.82 MB,5000x3333,5000:3333,Clipboard.jpg)

File: eddc5747b1b3f5d⋯.jpg (1.15 MB,5000x3333,5000:3333,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23759596 (231004ZOCT25) Notable: Forced adoption redress scheme to offer compensation for impacted Tasmanians – Tasmania will establish a redress scheme for women subjected to historical forced adoptions, becoming the second jurisdiction after Victoria to do so. Premier Jeremy Rockliff apologised for the “significant pain and suffering” caused by the practice, promising compensation and counselling support to affected mothers. Survivors, including 75-year-old Robyn Cohen, welcomed the move but warned consultation delays could see victims die before receiving justice. Lawyer Angela Sdrinis said the government must “move very swiftly” and that Victoria’s $30,000 payment was “woefully inadequate.” The scheme, limited to mothers, is expected to begin next year with transitional payments available sooner.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Forced adoption redress scheme to offer compensation for impacted Tasmanians

Madeleine Rojahn - 23 October 2025

1/2

Tasmanian mothers who were subjected to historical forced adoption practices will be able to seek compensation under a redress scheme, the state government has announced.

As many as 250,000 forced adoptions have taken place across Australia since the 1950s, with several state and federal inquiries having highlighted the trauma suffered under the practice.

In 1969, Tasmanian mother Robyn Cohen gave birth at the age of 18.

She said she was denied a chance to cradle or kiss her baby before they were put up for adoption without her consent, a move that laid the ground for years of major trauma and depression.

Ms Cohen said while the scheme "will go one step in my journey towards healing", she was concerned extensive consultation would delay it.

"I'm 75, many [of the] other women are older than I am," she said.

"One of our members has kidney cancer, another has died. I'm afraid that more of us will die before this happens if it's extended consultation.

"I will never get what I want, because no money will compensate me for the fact I have no memories of my baby.

"No amount of compensation will give me back my baby."

The announcement will make Tasmania the second Australian state or territory behind Victoria to announce a redress scheme, with the initiative being a recommendation from a national 2012 Senate inquiry.

The inquiry heard women's experiences ranged from being drugged and physically shackled to beds while giving birth, to social workers failing to advise mothers of government payments that could have supported them to keep their child.

In making the announcement on Thursday, Tasmanian Premier Jeremy Rockliff said the adoptions "caused significant pain and suffering for so many women".

"To the mothers who were affected by these practices all those decades ago, we are immensely sorry," Mr Rockliff said.

"Our government is committed to ensuring affected mothers have access to financial assistance and support.

"The establishment of a redress scheme will ensure that they do not need to go through adversarial court processes to do so."

From apology to redress scheme

Following the Senate inquiry, then-Tasmanian premier Lara Giddings offered an apology in 2012 to the families impacted by the historical practice.

Since that time, there have been calls to introduce compensation for impacted people.

Earlier this year, a woman known by the pseudonym OL became the first person impacted by forced adoptions to reach a settlement with the state.

In the 1970s, OL was 18 years old and unmarried when she gave birth in southern Tasmania and had her baby taken from her.

Her case was heard in the Supreme Court of Tasmania.

OL was one of a cohort of 18 women represented by lawyer Angela Sdrinis.

Ms Sdrinis said while she was "pleased the government had come to the table", for her clients who were unwell or elderly, the announcement had come too late.

"The trauma they've suffered has impacted on them physically and mentally and justice delayed is justice denied," she said.

Ms Sdrinis said she would advocate for a timely rollout of the scheme.

"The government needs to move very swiftly," she said.

"The scheme needs to be fair and to appropriately recognise the lifelong suffering of our clients.

"We need finality. These women need to draw a line in the sand and move on as best they can once their suffering has been acknowledged."

Ms Sdrinis said Victoria's $30,000 one-off payment offered under its redress scheme was "absolutely woefully inadequate".

"If you want to compare it to the national redress scheme for child sexual abuse survivors, that's $150,000. Various schemes for compensation, such as the stolen generation, are significantly more," she said.

"I think the government should be looking at the upper range of what a redress scheme can pay rather than that very low range we have in Victoria."

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122434

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23759609 (231010ZOCT25) Notable: Video: US conspiracy theorist linked to Wieambilla shootings pleads guilty to watered-down charge – Arizona-based conspiracy theorist Donald Day Jr, known online as “Geronimo’s Bones”, has pleaded guilty to unlawfully possessing firearms and ammunition after police found nine high-powered weapons, hundreds of rounds, and a sniper hide at his rural property. The plea deal dropped charges of threatening FBI agents and public figures. Prosecutors said Day had exchanged messages with Queensland extremists Gareth, Stacey, and Nathaniel Train, who murdered police constables Matthew Arnold and Rachel McCrow, and neighbour Alan Dare during the 2022 Wieambilla ambush. Despite a violent criminal history banning him from owning firearms, Day admitted using and teaching others to use them. He has served two years in custody and faces up to 15 years in prison, though prosecutors have agreed to recommend a sentence at the lower end of the scale.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122323

US conspiracy theorist linked to Wieambilla shootings pleads guilty to watered-down charge

Laine Clark - Oct 22, 2025

An American conspiracy theorist linked to the shocking Wieambilla shootings that left six people dead has pleaded guilty to a watered-down charge under a plea deal.

Arizona-based Donald Day Jr faced a United States court after a stockpile of weapons and ammunition were found at his rural property along with a sniper hide.

The convicted felon pleaded guilty to a single charge of unlawfully possessing firearms and ammunition as part of his plea deal that was signed off by an Arizona judge.

He had also faced charges relating to making threats to public figures and FBI agents but they were dropped as part of the deal.

US prosecutors said Day - known online as "Geronimo's Bones" - corresponded via social media with Gareth and Stacey Train in Queensland around the time of the deadly Wieambilla ambush.

The couple, along with Nathaniel Train, murdered Queensland police officers Matthew Arnold and Rachel McCrow, along with neighbour Alan Dare in Wieambilla in 2022.

The Trains were killed in a shootout with police during an ensuing siege at their regional property.

Investigators established direct links between Day with Gareth and Stacey Train through posts from "Geronimo's Bones".

Day described Queensland police as "malignant, malformed and malevolent", should be shown "absolutely no quarter", telling the Trains he wanted to be at Wieambilla in person.

Court documents detailed how Gareth and Stacey Train had posted an apocalyptic video on YouTube after the shootings, saying authorities "came to kill us and we killed them".'

"If you don't defend yourself against these devils and demons, you're a coward … we'll see you at home, Don. Love you," the Trains said.

Day was later found with a cache of nine high-powered firearms and hundreds of rounds of ammunition at a rural property in Heber, Arizona, that was equipped with a gun range and sniper hide, court documents showed.

"The firearms and ammunition were kept in the mobile home I shared with SS, in a room we called the 'gun room'," Day admitted in the plea deal.

Day said he regularly accessed both the gun room and the weapons and also instructed others on how to use the firearms correctly.

According to court documents, Day had been prohibited from possessing weapons and firearms because of his violent criminal history.

Day faces a maximum penalty of up to 15 years in prison or a fine of $US250,000 ($A381,500) after pleading guilty to the single charge.

However, the plea deal for Day - who has served two years in custody - stipulates he will be sentenced under the low end of the sentencing guidelines.

Day is set to be sentenced on January 8.

https://www.9news.com.au/national/wieambilla-shooting-us-court-donald-day-jr-pleads-guilty-under-plea-deal/b2b2e79c-08eb-465a-9b19-18c753bb91c8

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JsAk4ejQ5Qk

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122435

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23763863 (241118ZOCT25) Notable: Video: Servicewomen launch legal action against Defence Force over sexual assault, discrimination – Australian servicewomen have launched a landmark class action against the Commonwealth, alleging decades of systemic sexual violence, rape, harassment and discrimination within the Australian Defence Force. Filed in the Federal Court by law firm JGA Saddler, the suit could involve up to 20,000 women. Lawyer Josh Aylward said many faced retaliation for reporting assaults. Former RAAF member “Gemma” said she was forced to keep working alongside her alleged attacker, leaving her with severe trauma and suicidal thoughts. The 2024 Defence Suicides Royal Commission found 800 sexual assault allegations in five years. Defence said it was developing a new sexual misconduct prevention strategy under Respect@Work reforms.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Servicewomen launch legal action against Defence Force over sexual assault, discrimination

Grant McArthur and Niddal Mustafa - October 24, 2025

1/2

Australian servicewomen have launched unprecedented legal action against the Australian Defence Force over allegations they suffered systemic sexual violence, harassment, rape and discrimination while serving their country.

Claims of prolonged victimisation from male colleagues, including accusations of assaults within the past year, are included in a class action filed against the Commonwealth in the Federal Court on Friday.

The legal action follows an investigation by this masthead and 60 Minutes, in which women in Defence spoke out about their sexual assaults and the pressure placed on them to stay quiet, or the consequences if they spoke up.

Four lead applicants will spearhead the lawsuit, filed by class-action law firm JGA Saddler, and include claims of waking up naked and injured with no memory of having left a party with four male colleagues, of men rubbing their groins against them and touching their breasts, having to fight off a male Navy colleague’s unwanted advances, and being groped and kissed while pinned against a wall.

The class action is open to between 10,000 and 20,000 women who have worked in the ADF since 2023, and lawyer Josh Aylward said thousands wanted their voices heard so they can push for change.

“The women in the ADF have been subjected to sexual violence, harassment, discrimination and [then] retaliation when they report that these incidents have happened,” he said.

“These women have enormous courage going to join the defence force and to fight for our country, but they should be there having to defend our country, not defend themselves from their colleagues.

“The ADF has done many reports and inquiries over the last 40 years about how bad it is for women in the ADF. But what you find in their own evidence and their own reports and independent studies is that things are getting worse for women in the ADF, and women are less likely now to report an incident happening than they were 10 years ago.”

Gemma, who served in the RAAF, was one of several serving and civilian women who accused a colleague of sexual assault. She said she received little support from Defence during an investigation in which she had to continue working alongside her accused attacker.

While she is not one of the four lead applicants, Gemma said she will join the class action to push for a safer workplace for women in the future.

“I know that it is still happening to women in the ADF, and it needs to stop,” she said.

“My mental health has been significantly impacted. I lost my career, sense of self and experienced suicidal ideation. I questioned everything and lost trust in the ADF and its leadership.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122436

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23763913 (241130ZOCT25) Notable: Video: Police Taskforce Summit to take over ongoing search for fugitive Dezi Freeman – Victoria Police has launched Taskforce Summit to lead the ongoing hunt for fugitive Dezi Freeman, accused of murdering two police officers in Porepunkah, 300km northeast of Melbourne, on August 26. The taskforce, led by a detective inspector from the State Anti-Gangs Division, includes detectives from Crime Command, the Fugitive Squad, Armed Crime Squad, VIPER Taskforce, Special Operations Group and Search and Rescue. Mount Buffalo National Park, long central to the search, has now fully reopened after extensive but fruitless sweeps. Assistant Commissioner Martin O’Brien urged public assistance, saying the $1 million reward for Freeman’s arrest remains in place. Police believe a tip-off will ultimately end the manhunt.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109588 (pb)

>>122153

>>122185

>>122309

>>122334

>>122376

Police Taskforce Summit to take over ongoing search for fugitive Dezi Freeman

Molly Magennis - 24 October 2025

A police taskforce will take over the ongoing search for fugitive Dezi Freeman as a national park at the centre of his disappearance fully opens to the public.

Freeman has been on the run since he allegedly shot and killed two police officers in Porepunkah, 300km northeast of Melbourne, on August 26.

A significant number of resources have been pumped into the search for the 56-year-old - who also goes by Desmond Filby - however no trace of him has been found.

Now over two months since the alleged shooting Victoria Police has announced Taskforce Summit will take over in leading the search for Freeman.

The taskforce will be based in the Great Alpine area and led by a detective inspector from the Crime Command State Anti-Gangs Division.

It will comprise of detectives from Crime Command, specialist resources from the Fugitive Squad, Armed Crime Squad, VIPER Taskforce, Special Operations Group and Search and Rescue Squad.

Mount Buffalo National Park, which is located not far from where Freeman was living and where the alleged shooting occurred, had been closed while officers scoured the area.

Police believed he may have fled into the park however extensive searches from the air and on the ground have failed to locate him.

Last week the park was partially reopened.

Police announced on Friday it had now fully reopened to the public.

Parks Victoria staff will be patrolling the area.

Assistant Commissioner Martin O’Brien reassured the public the search for Freeman was far from over and that police remained committed to finding him.

However the search will likely only come to an end with a tip-off from a member of the public, O’Brien said.

“I strongly urge anyone with any information at all, no matter how small you think it may be, to come forward and contact Crime Stoppers,” he said.

“This could be sightings of Freeman, information you’re hearing in your local communities, even suspicious activity on your property - whatever it is, we want to hear from you. As always, this can be done anonymously.”

A $1 million reward for Freeman’s arrest remains in place.

https://7news.com.au/news/police-taskforce-summit-to-take-over-ongoing-search-for-fugitive-dezi-freeman-c-20453808

https://www.police.vic.gov.au/taskforce-summit-leads-search-desmond-freeman

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1C5cSLsESz4

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122437

File: 04706d28a0aa9a2⋯.jpg (131.48 KB,1200x675,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 0571dbae1f882ec⋯.jpg (157.96 KB,1022x681,1022:681,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23767648 (250924ZOCT25) Notable: ‘I was Epstein’s perfect victim’: the life of Virginia Giuffre in her own words – Virginia Giuffre’s posthumous memoir Nobody’s Girl provides the most complete account yet of her life, tracing her abuse by Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell, her alleged encounters with Prince Andrew, and her later years in Australia. Recruited at 16 while working at Donald Trump’s Mar-a-Lago resort, Giuffre describes being drawn into Epstein’s circle, forced into sexual servitude and flown to meet his powerful associates. She alleges she was trafficked internationally and abused by Andrew three times, claims he continues to deny. The book also recounts her early family trauma, escape to Thailand, marriage to Australian Robert Giuffre, and her role in helping expose Epstein’s network through US lawsuits. In her final years she struggled with mental illness and domestic difficulties. Giuffre died by suicide in Perth in April 2025, aged 41, leaving instructions that her memoir be published to raise awareness of sexual exploitation and trafficking.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122204

>>122391

>>122392

>>122400

‘I was Epstein’s perfect victim’: the life of Virginia Giuffre in her own words

Finished shortly before her death, Virginia Giuffre’s memoir Nobody’s Girl traces her abuse by Epstein and Maxwell, and alleged encounters with Prince Andrew

Josie Ensor - October 20 2025

1/4

In her telling of a now-infamous night in London with Prince Andrew, what was ingrained in Virginia Roberts Giuffre’s memory was her outfit: a pink sleeveless crop top and a pair of sparkly jeans.

Ghislaine Maxwell had wanted Giuffre in a demure dress, something more appropriate for dinner with the Queen’s second son. But like any other teenage girl, Giuffre wanted to dress like the pop stars of the day.

“I idolised Britney Spears and Christina Aguilera, and the outfit was something I imagined the two of them might wear,” she wrote in her posthumous memoir, Nobody’s Girl, released on Tuesday. “I told Maxwell it felt more like me.”

A photograph taken of Giuffre in her pink top and jeans — the then duke, aged 41, clutching at her bare midriff — would eventually lead to Andrew’s downfall and one of the biggest royal scandals in modern history.

While Giuffre may only have been 17 years old, Andrew was the latest in a long line of men accused of sexually abusing her. He has always denied the allegations and claimed the picture was fabricated.

The story of Giuffre has been told and retold in the pages of newspapers and in the dockets filed in civil lawsuits, but the book offers the first full account of her life in her own words.

Giuffre warns early on that it will be a difficult read. “I know this is a lot to take in. The violence. The bad decisions. The self harm,” she writes. “But please, don’t stop reading.”

Reflecting on the title of the 400-page biography, she explains that she had been “everyone’s girl” and yet “nobody’s girl”. Giuffre consequently chose Nobody’s Girl as the title of the book, a melancholic reference to French author Hector Malot’s novel of the same name about an orphan adopted by a rich grandfather figure.

Page after page tells of the alleged abuse and betrayal that culminated in Giuffre taking her own life in April, shortly after the manuscript was completed.

Giuffre’s early life

Giuffre grew up in the down-at-heel town of Loxahatchee, Florida, as the middle child and only daughter of mother Lynn and father Sky Roberts. While her early childhood — marked by a poverty that verged on neglect — had been far from idyllic, it was fairly ordinary.

That was until she claimed her father Sky Roberts started abusing her, an allegation Roberts strenuously denies in a statement published in the book where he claims he “only tried to give my children a good life”. Roberts did not respond to additional requests for comment from The Times.

In her preteen and early teenage years Giuffre had come to see her value only in what her body could offer, having casual sex with any boy who so much as asked.

She recalls lying in her bed one night and thinking of a quote from one of her favourite children’s books, Charlotte’s Web. A lamb tells Wilbur that pigs mean “less than nothing” to her. Wilbur is outraged and argues there is no such thing. Giuffre says she “tried to remember a time when I’d been more than nothing”.

Writing in her book, she says the early abuse she suffered made her the “perfect victim” for Jeffrey Epstein.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122438

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23767658 (250941ZOCT25) Notable: Review: Virginia Giuffre’s devastating memoir reveals a lifetime of abuse – (Video) "Her name may forever be tied to powerful men — Jeffrey Epstein, Prince Andrew, Jean-Luc Brunel — but Virginia Roberts Giuffre makes it known that she wants to stand alone now. And with Nobody’s Girl, she reclaims her identity from all of them. The posthumous memoir, which follows Giuffre’s suicide earlier this year at the age of 41, is a devastating read. With composure and candour, the abuse survivor and sex-trafficking activist recounts a short life marred by sexual violence. It started in early childhood at the hands of her father, and proved unrelenting until adulthood. Only fleeing from paedophile Epstein and his co-conspirator Ghislaine Maxwell put an end to it. Before she died, Giuffre insisted that she wanted her autobiography to be published, collaborating with ghostwriter Amy Wallace for four years to chronicle a tragic but fearless life. Her personal backstory had been repeatedly maligned and mischaracterised ever since she went public with her abuse. After sharing her trauma to courts and the media so many times, Nobody’s Girl was to be her final comment on Epstein." – Nathan Smith, The Age

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122204

>>122391

>>122392

>>122400

Review: Virginia Giuffre’s devastating memoir reveals a lifetime of abuse

Nathan Smith - October 21, 2025

1/2

Warning: Graphic content

Her name may forever be tied to powerful men – Jeffrey Epstein, Prince Andrew, Jean-Luc Brunel – but Virginia Roberts Giuffre makes it known that she wants to stand alone now. And with Nobody’s Girl, she reclaims her identity from all of them.

The posthumous memoir, which follows Giuffre’s suicide earlier this year at the age of 41, is a devastating read. With composure and candour, the abuse survivor and sex-trafficking activist recounts a short life marred by sexual violence. It started in early childhood at the hands of her father, and proved unrelenting until adulthood. Only fleeing from paedophile Epstein and his co-conspirator Ghislaine Maxwell put an end to it.

Before she died, Giuffre insisted that she wanted her autobiography to be published, collaborating with ghostwriter Amy Wallace for four years to chronicle a tragic but fearless life. Her personal backstory had been repeatedly maligned and mischaracterised ever since she went public with her abuse. After sharing her trauma to courts and the media so many times, Nobody’s Girl was to be her final comment on Epstein.

No one should have endured the deep suffering that Giuffre endured. As a young girl, her father allegedly abused her, even giving her away to a family friend to be abused. (Her father “strenuously” denies these allegations.) Her mother then became distant and cruel, beating Giuffre with thorny rose branches as the young girl started to act out.

A “treatment” centre was next, where despair and disillusionment set in; repeated attempts to escape followed. During one jailbreak, the 14-year-old runaway was tricked into joining an older escort kingpin who proceeded to feed her hard drugs and trafficked her to other men. A chance encounter at 15 with Maxwell – a “molester with posh manners and an aristocratic pedigree” – elicited a fleeting glimmer of hope for Giuffre before a new hell began.

As Giuffre couldn’t turn to her parents or trust authorities, the Epstein and Maxwell “family” set Giuffre on a ruinous cycle of abuse and brutality. While many of Epstein’s horrors on young women have been recounted before, Giuffre’s own stories can be difficult to read in succession. (Some experiences are too harrowing to recount here.) The activist, sensing the intensity of her dark tales, gives readers regular interludes away from her recollections.

Powerful men from across the world, from politicians to scientists, descend on Giuffre to rape her and others. A “former minister” so brutalises Giuffre that she leaves the scene “bleeding from my mouth, vagina, and anus”. Epstein and modelling mogul Brunel abused her and others together, taking a “mutual malignant pleasure in our misfortune”.

Then, of course, there are her repeat encounters with Prince Andrew, who “believed having sex with me was his birthright”. Asked about Giuffre’s age, the then-41-year-old correctly guesses that his “daughters are just a little younger” than the then-17-year-old. The royal, Giuffre writes, proved “particularly attentive” to her feet, “caressing” the toes and “licking” the arches. (Following renewed public backlash, Andrew has now relinquished his Duke of York title.)

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122439

File: c3673737efaed65⋯.jpg (255.52 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 9b2e02d570c5d26⋯.jpg (155.06 KB,2000x1125,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23767695 (251022ZOCT25) Notable: Nobody’s Girl review: Should you read Virginia Giuffre’s memoir?"I have lost count of the number of people — most of them women — who want an answer to this question. They have seen all the reporting around Nobody’s Girl … and they have mixed feelings about whether they should buy a copy. Some are thinking: oh, do I really want to read a memoir of abuse? Others may be thinking: haven’t we heard all this before? … Some, like Virginia, won’t make it. She’s dead. So, should you read it? Look, I’m going to make the case for yes, emphatically yes. Nobody’s Girl is an immensely valuable resource … Giuffre was a child growing up in the small town of Loxahatchee when she was assaulted by a grown-up. ‘When children are abused,’ she explains, ‘they start to believe that love and violation go together.’ … She names many of the people who took advantage of her, which brings me to the reference to Trump on page 222. It doesn’t fit the narrative: ‘Epstein had been shunned by at least one powerful person,’ Giuffre writes. ‘Donald Trump ended Epstein’s membership at Mar-a-Lago … after Epstein hit on the teenage daughter of another member.’" – Caroline Overington, The Australian

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122204

>>122391

>>122392

>>122400

Nobody’s Girl review: Should you read Virginia Giuffre’s memoir?

I have lost count of the number of people – most of them women – who want an answer to this question.

CAROLINE OVERINGTON - October 21, 2025

1/2

Should I read it?

I have lost count of the number of people – most of them women – who want an answer to this question.

They have seen all the reporting around Nobody’s Girl, by the late Virginia Roberts Giuffre, and they have mixed feelings about whether they should buy a copy.

Some are thinking: oh, do I really want to read a memoir of abuse? I’m sure it’s sad and worthy, etc etc, but I need an escape!

Others may be thinking: OK, but haven’t we heard all this before? Prince Andrew is a grub, and Jeffrey Epstein was a sex-obsessed monster, and the people that hung around them, hoping for free trips on the private jets, and the so-called “glamour” of having a trapped and broken girl massage their feet by the pool?

They are repulsive, obviously.

Some reluctant readers will themselves be survivors of sexual abuse, because the hard truth is that many women don’t get through life without being made to do something of a sexual nature that they do not want to do. Most survivors – let’s retire “victim” shall we? – try to shrug it off, because the cost (financially, socially, professionally) of doing anything else is far too high.

Others battle for the rest of their lives, trying to find a place where they can feel secure and happy.

Some, like Virginia, won’t make it. And that’s one of things that frankly makes this book difficult to read, because you keep thinking to yourself oh, but it’s OK, it’s OK, she got through it, she survived.

She didn’t.

She’s dead.

So, should you read it?

Look, I’m going to make the case for yes, emphatically yes.

I’m also going to reveal what the book says about Donald Trump, since everyone seems to have missed that, at least in the reporting to date.

Nobody’s Girl is an immensely valuable resource, for it helps us understand what it means to live in the world, as a survivor.

Virginia Giuffre was a child growing up in the small town of Loxahatchee when she was assaulted by a grown-up.

It triggered confusion and feelings of shame.

She explains what a counsellor told her, years later: “When children are abused, they start to believe that love and violation go together.”

“I don’t enjoy repeating this story,” she says. “It hurts to relive what was done to me. My body was used in ways that did enormous damage to me. But the worst things weren’t physical, but psychological.”

She was manipulated into behaviours that “ate away at me, eroding my ability to defend myself … I was groomed to be complicit in my own devastation.”

That is a brilliant summation: she became complicit in her own destruction, as people grappling with shame so often do (it can take the form of drug and alcohol abuse, and other maladaptive coping strategies, such as lying, cheating, and entering into terrible relationships, in the hope of being “saved” and so on.)

Virginia says many survivors are criticised for returning to the scene of the abuse (in her case, Epstein’s mansion, where she was a regular guest from the age of 16).

“How can you complain about being abused,” she writes, “when you could so easily have stayed away?”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122440

File: 892d99a8c9c3034⋯.jpg (261 KB,3800x2620,190:131,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 7ebce6cb281e854⋯.jpg (293.56 KB,3800x3038,1900:1519,Clipboard.jpg)

File: b444f3538fedd99⋯.jpg (120.77 KB,1279x720,1279:720,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23767734 (251059ZOCT25) Notable: Nobody’s Girl by Virginia Roberts Giuffre review: a devastating exposé of power, corruption and abuse"There is a strand running through Nobody’s Girl - a memoir by Virginia Roberts Giuffre, who died by suicide in April this year – in which the activist and survivor of Jeffrey Epstein grapples with something more insidious than abuse. “I know it is a lot to take in,” she writes after a gruelling early passage detailing how she was sexually abused as a child. “But please don’t stop reading.” After recounting the first time Epstein allegedly forced her to have sex with one of his billionaire friends, she writes, “I need a breather. I bet you do too.” Throughout the book, Giuffre beguiles, apologises and cheerfully breaks the fourth wall in an effort to soften the distaste she assumes her story will trigger. Make no mistake: this is a book about power, corruption, industrial-scale sex abuse and the way in which institutions sided with the perpetrator over his victims. Epstein hanged himself in prison while awaiting trial in 2019 and Ghislaine Maxwell, his co-conspirator, is serving a 20-year sentence for sex trafficking, outcomes largely enabled by Giuffre’s testimony. But it is also a book about how a young woman becomes a hero. And yet here she is, having to charm us out of shrinking from her in horror. Giuffre was rightly proud of holding Epstein and Maxwell to account. And yet for any survivor of sexual violence, the cost of recovery - let alone of confronting her abusers in front of the world - can be impossibly steep. At the beginning of the book, Amy Wallace shares details of Giuffre’s fraught final months, including multiple health problems and alleged domestic violence at the hands of Robert Giuffre, her Australian husband ... On 1 April, Giuffre wrote to Wallace: “It is my heartfelt wish that this work be published, regardless of my circumstances at the time.” Three weeks later, she was found dead on her remote Australian farm, leaving behind three children. In a lawsuit Giuffre brought against Epstein in 2009, her lawyers stated the injuries she suffered as a result of his abuse included “a loss of the capacity to enjoy life”, and were of a magnitude that made them “permanent in nature”. The same might be said for this important, courageous, tragically posthumous book." - Emma Brockes, The Guardian

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122204

>>122391

>>122392

>>122400

Nobody’s Girl by Virginia Roberts Giuffre review – a devastating exposé of power, corruption and abuse

Giuffre’s posthumously published memoir lays bare the life-wrecking impact of Jeffrey Epstein’s crimes – but it is also the story of how a young woman becomes a hero

Emma Brockes - 20 Oct 2025

1/2

There is a strand running through Nobody’s Girl – a memoir by Virginia Roberts Giuffre, who died by suicide in April this year – in which the activist and survivor of Jeffrey Epstein grapples with something more insidious than abuse. “I know it is a lot to take in,” she writes after a gruelling early passage detailing how she was sexually abused as a child. “But please don’t stop reading.” After recounting the first time Epstein allegedly forced her to have sex with one of his billionaire friends, she writes, “I need a breather. I bet you do too.”

Throughout the book, Giuffre beguiles, apologises and cheerfully breaks the fourth wall in an effort to soften the distaste she assumes her story will trigger. Make no mistake: this is a book about power, corruption, industrial-scale sex abuse and the way in which institutions sided with the perpetrator over his victims. Epstein hanged himself in prison while awaiting trial in 2019 and Ghislaine Maxwell, his co-conspirator, is serving a 20-year sentence for sex trafficking, outcomes largely enabled by Giuffre’s testimony. But it is also a book about how a young woman becomes a hero. And yet here she is, having to charm us out of shrinking from her in horror.

Of course, these assumptions of hers aren’t wrong. Giuffre, who was 41 when she died and whose deft, smart book is co-written with the journalist Amy Wallace, knows that to be a victim of sexual violence is to be at best pitied, at worst reviled. (Sample headline from the Daily News: “Jeffrey Epstein Accuser Was Not a Sex Slave, but a Money-Hungry Sex Kitten, Her Former Friends Say.”) I approached Nobody’s Girl with two questions. First, does it give any insight into the so-called Epstein list, the catalogue of prominent men to whom Giuffre and others were trafficked? The closest we get to a fresh allegation is Giuffre’s description of one of the scores of men Epstein forced her to have sex with as a “politician” and “former minister”, who choked and beat her almost unconscious, but who, she writes, is too powerful to name. (When she told Epstein how violent the man had been, he said coldly: “You’ll get that sometimes.”)

Second, does the book make life harder for Ghislaine Maxwell, currently in a low security prison in Texas and sucking up to President Trump to have her sentence reduced? (Her latest appeal was rejected earlier this month.) On this score, Giuffre’s account must shunt the possibility of reprieve further out of reach. It was Maxwell – or “G Max” as she insisted the girls call her – who spotted Giuffre working as a 16-year-old locker-room assistant at Mar-a-Lago in 2000, and brought her to Epstein’s house to be “interviewed” as a possible masseuse. Giuffre was forced to have sex with Epstein that day and both then and in subsequent assaults, Maxwell participated. “Maxwell began lashing out at me during our threesomes,” writes Giuffre. “If I complained, she hurt me more.”

This brings me to a third question: given its punishing nature, why read this book? I’ve heard more than one person say they “don’t have the stomach” for it – not phrasing any victim needs to hear – but while the book is relentlessly, shockingly hard, it is also a clear-eyed and necessary account of how sex offenders operate. Giuffre’s greatest fear – that being raped and trafficked puts her beyond empathetic reach of most people – is not, in fact, what happens. Narrative does what deposition can’t by taking us into the room with her. The book breathes life into Giuffre’s legal status as a victim, showing us a girl like any we know, like us, and enlivening the reality of those who are trafficked while being “free” to walk away.

Abused since the age of six, by the time she met Epstein, Giuffre writes: “I had been sexualized against my will and had survived by acquiescing. I was a pleaser, even when pleasing others cost me dearly. For 10 years, men had cloaked their abuse of me in a fake mantle of ‘love’. Epstein and Maxwell knew just how to tap into that same crooked vein.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122441

File: d287aa985693d4b⋯.jpg (131.11 KB,1440x813,480:271,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 81a9325cbe6dc3f⋯.jpg (65.74 KB,634x584,317:292,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 611ef162cb9b192⋯.jpg (174.17 KB,1440x960,3:2,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23767761 (251129ZOCT25) Notable: The tragic life of Virginia Giuffre, victim of Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell"Choosing the saddest moment in Virginia Giuffre’s life is tough. Was it the father who traded her prepubescent body to a friend? The “prime minister” who raped her so violently he left her bleeding? Or the bitter end of the relationship with the only man who dedicated his life to fixing hers? Virginia Giuffre, who died by her own hand six months ago, acknowledges the abuse catalogued in her posthumous memoir, Nobody’s Girl, constitutes a “trauma reel.” Published on Tuesday, the book is an insiders account of one of the great abuse-of-power scandals of the 21st century. As one of the financier Jeffrey Epstein’s central victims, Giuffre was presented as a gift to the rich and powerful. The abuse continued after Giuffre escaped aged 19. Prince Andrew, the most prominent man accused by Giuffre of using her for sex, asked a police bodyguard to investigate the young woman, who he told a senior palace official had a criminal record in the US, the Daily Mail reported overnight. In Nobody’s Girl Giuffre describes how, as a teenager, she believed Epstein cared for the girls he shared around for sex. She changed her mind when a man described as a “well-known prime minister” choked and beat her in a room on Epstein’s private Caribbean island. Afterwards, Giuffre begged Epstein for protection. He coldly told her the abuse was part of her job ... There was no happy ending. Unable to bear the weigh of her life, Giuffre took her life at the Western Australia property she bought with compensation from lawsuits against banks that helped Epstein’s business after he was accused of sexual abuse against children in 2006. Written over four years, Nobody’s Girl’s original text portrayed Giuffre’s husband as her saviour. The couple’s marriage broke down in the months before her death, though, and Robert had taken out a legal order restricting her access to their three children. Three weeks before her suicide, People magazine reported she was an alleged victim of domestic violence. The magazine reported that her brother Sky Roberts and his wife Amanda were allegedly concerned she could die at the hands of her estranged partner, who denied the allegation He was not charged, even though Giuffre made a police complaint at the time, according to People. As the book neared publication, family members became concerned the manuscript presented the marriage too positively. They convinced publisher Knopf to include a foreword that referred to the bitter end of the relationship. Powerless and pretty, the teenage Giuffre was exploited by men who had everything she didn’t. As an adult, Giuffre was no longer a victim. The strength of her story made her far more powerful, morally, than anyone who abused her." – Aaron Patrick, The Nightly

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122204

>>122391

>>122392

>>122400

The tragic life of Virginia Giuffre, victim of Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell

Aaron Patrick - 20 OCT 2025

1/2

Choosing the saddest moment in Virginia Giuffre’s life is tough.

Was it the father who traded her prepubescent body to a friend?

The “prime minister” who raped her so violently he left her bleeding? Or the bitter end of the relationship with the only man who dedicated his life to fixing hers?

Virginia Giuffre, who died by her own hand six months ago, acknowledges the abuse catalogued in her posthumous memoir, Nobody’s Girl, constitutes a “trauma reel.”

Published on Tuesday, the book is an insiders account of one of the great abuse-of-power scandals of the 21st century. As one of the financier Jeffrey Epstein’s central victims, Giuffre was presented as a gift to the rich and powerful.

The abuse continued after Giuffre escaped aged 19.

Prince Andrew, the most prominent man accused by Giuffre of using her for sex, asked a police bodyguard to investigate the young woman, who he told a senior palace official had a criminal record in the US, the Daily Mail reported overnight.

In Nobody’s Girl Giuffre describes how, as a teenager, she believed Epstein cared for the girls he shared around for sex.

She changed her mind when a man described as a “well-known prime minister” choked and beat her in a room on Epstein’s private Caribbean island. Afterwards, Giuffre begged Epstein for protection.

He coldly told her the abuse was part of her job.

Prince Andrew

That moment was the start of the end. Epstein and his friend, lover and business partner, Ghislaine Maxwell, asked Giuffre to act as a surrogate mother for them.

The payment for renting her womb would include money, accommodation and 24-hour professional childcare — but no legal rights to the child, who she feared would become another sexual victim.

Giuffre was a teenager, but smart enough to work out how to escape. On a trip to Thailand to study massage techniques for Epstein, she met Australian Robert Giuffre, and married him 10 days later.

After giving birth to a daughter in 2010, Giuffre decided she wanted to hold Epstein and his powerful circle of sex abusers to account, including Prince Andrew, whose famous photo with her and Maxwell made it harder for the royal to convince the world her allegations he abused her three times were untrue.

Prince Andrew has steadfastly insisted on his innocence. If King Charles believes him, the monarch isn’t providing much support.

On Friday, after consultations with the palace, the 65-year-old prince surrendered one of his most valuable assets: the title of Duke of York.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122442

File: 490c557fbdf180e⋯.jpg (263.46 KB,1200x675,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 4e6c990f8bcdf6e⋯.jpg (274.68 KB,1022x1087,1022:1087,Clipboard.jpg)

File: b8efafaa59a52bc⋯.jpg (162.61 KB,1022x577,1022:577,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23767774 (251151ZOCT25) Notable: ‘Tell us everything you saw, Andrew, for Virginia’s sake’ – Amy Wallace, the American journalist who co-wrote Virginia Giuffre’s memoir Nobody’s Girl, has urged Prince Andrew to reveal what he knows about Jeffrey Epstein’s network, regardless of his personal involvement. Wallace said Giuffre’s “fervent wish” was that every man she was trafficked to be brought to justice. Having worked alongside Giuffre for four years, Wallace described her as brave, wary of trust after Ghislaine Maxwell’s betrayal, and determined to help other survivors. The book recounts Giuffre’s alleged encounters with Epstein, Maxwell, and Prince Andrew, whom she accused of misconduct — claims Andrew has always denied. Wallace said Andrew “has information about other things that were going on” and should step forward. She also revealed Giuffre’s admiration for Donald Trump, her disillusionment with politics, and her isolation before her death. “She built a life beyond her trauma,” Wallace said, “even though it wasn’t perfect all the time.”

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122204

>>122391

>>122392

>>122400

‘Tell us everything you saw, Andrew, for Virginia’s sake’

Amy Wallace, who co-wrote Virginia Giuffre’s memoir, Nobody’s Girl, urges Prince Andrew to reveal any information he has, regardless of his involvement

Katie Gatens - October 19 2025

1/3

As a ghostwriter of celebrity memoirs, Amy Wallace is used to putting herself in the background, channelling her subjects’ deepest thoughts and memories. Being invisible.

This is how it was meant to be with her latest project, Nobody’s Girl: A Memoir of Surviving Abuse and Fighting for Justice, by Virginia Roberts Giuffre — the most prominent victim of Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell’s sex trafficking ring.

A 17-year-old Giuffre was recruited as a masseuse by Maxwell while working at Mar-a-Lago in Florida in mid-2000. Over two years Giuffre claims she was forced to have sex with Epstein, a wealthy financier, and his business associates, including, on three occasions, with Prince Andrew. The prince has denied these allegations and settled, without admission of liability, a civil claim brought against him by Giuffre in 2022 for an undisclosed sum.

In becoming one of the first victims to publicly speak out against Epstein, Giuffre was heralded as a prominent advocate for survivors of sexual abuse.

Then, in April this year, she took her own life.

The posthumous memoir, released this week, would turn out to be Giuffre’s final words. Now Wallace, 63, has been thrown into the spotlight in her place.

Wallace is from California but appears via Zoom from a hotel room in New York City. Today, in a beige scarf and jumper with straight ice-white hair, she has back-to-back interviews and TV appearances to promote the book. This, she says, is not her wheelhouse.

“I wish that [Giuffre] was here talking to you right now — that’s how these things usually work, but her story is important,” says Wallace. “I’m glad to be able to talk about it, as hard as it is, because somebody needs to.”

In response to the news that Andrew had given up his royal titles on Friday, Wallace says: “I can’t speak for Virginia, and I wish she were here to speak for herself. But having worked alongside her for four years, I can say that it was her fervent wish that all the men she was trafficked to be brought to justice.

“While Prince Andrew’s relinquishing of his Duke of York title may appear symbolic, it is a step in the right direction. There is no question that it was Virginia’s strength and bravery that were the catalysts that brought about Prince Andrew’s fall from grace. The world should credit her and her powerful memoir for that accomplishment.”

Wallace worked with Giuffre for four years. She travelled to Paris to meet Giuffre for the first time. They went to New York, a place, Wallace says, that for Giuffre “had a lot of ghosts”.

Wallace also travelled to Australia twice, spending about a month living in the family home in Western Australia that Giuffre shared with her husband, Robbie, and three children, Alex, Tyler and Ellie.

“I was eating every meal with them,” says Wallace. “We went to her daughter’s volleyball game, we took walks. We were just kind of living. I was a fly on the wall. We went grocery shopping, we got our nails done with her daughter.”

Wallace shows a ring on her finger Giuffre that bought her in a thrift store. “She was constantly wanting to buy me things, which I wouldn’t let her do, but I let her buy me this for 50 cents,” she says. “I’ve been wearing it during the interviews, because I want her with me.”

Wallace is keen to emphasise that Giuffre’s memoir is not “a tell-all” or “a tawdry sex book” but something that Giuffre wanted to write in order to help survivors of abuse as well as allowing her to move on to the next chapter of her life: “The irony being, she had to repeat it one more time, for me.”

As well as chronicling Giuffre (née Roberts)’s life in Epstein’s inner circle, the book is a harrowing account of her allegations of a lifetime of sexual abuse, including by her father and her father’s friend. In the book Wallace writes that Giuffre’s father “strenuously” denied the allegations of abuse.

Wallace says that it was hard to hear her story: “It was like a repository of horrors.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122443

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23767778 (251158ZOCT25) Notable: Video: 'Nobody's Girl' shows Epstein accuser Virginia Giuffre as 'a woman in full,' says co-author - Author Amy Wallace joins Morning Joe to discuss 'Nobody's Girl: A Memoir of Surviving Abuse and Fighting for Justice,' a book she co-authored with Virginia Roberts Giuffre. - MSNBC

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122204

>>122391

>>122392

>>122400

>>122442

'Nobody's Girl' shows Epstein accuser Virginia Giuffre as 'a woman in full,' says co-author

MSNBC

Oct 23, 2025

Author Amy Wallace joins Morning Joe to discuss 'Nobody's Girl: A Memoir of Surviving Abuse and Fighting for Justice,' a book she co-authored with Virginia Roberts Giuffre.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=25ecXHFknJ0

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122444

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23767784 (251202ZOCT25) Notable: Video: Co-author of Epstein survivor Virginia Giuffre's memoir details new revelations from the book - 'I think she would be very proud and it's a victory for her even after her passing': Amy Wallace, co-author of "Nobody's Girl" details what it was like to work with Epstein survivor Virginia Roberts Giuffre's to write her memoir. - CNN

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122204

>>122391

>>122392

>>122400

>>122442

Co-author of Epstein survivor Virginia Giuffre's memoir details new revelations from the book

CNN

Oct 23, 2025

'I think she would be very proud and it's a victory for her even after her passing': Amy Wallace, co-author of "Nobody's Girl" details what it was like to work with Epstein survivor Virginia Roberts Giuffre's to write her memoir.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aGBJYx8KQ4A

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122445

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23767791 (251210ZOCT25) Notable: Video: Epstein survivor Virginia Giuffre’s posthumous memoir exposes abuse by powerful men - A new book tells the story of Virginia Roberts Giuffre, one of many victims of sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein. Giuffre died by suicide earlier this year. Her posthumous memoir explores her resilience while also revealing new details about the abuse she suffered at the hands of powerful figures. Amna Nawaz has that story. And a warning, this report includes accounts of sexual abuse and suicide. - PBS NewsHour

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122204

>>122391

>>122392

>>122400

>>122442

Epstein survivor Virginia Giuffre’s posthumous memoir exposes abuse by powerful men

PBS NewsHour

Oct 24, 2025

A new book tells the story of Virginia Roberts Giuffre, one of many victims of sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein. Giuffre died by suicide earlier this year. Her posthumous memoir explores her resilience while also revealing new details about the abuse she suffered at the hands of powerful figures. Amna Nawaz has that story. And a warning, this report includes accounts of sexual abuse and suicide.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mPoPIMVyqJk

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122446

File: ece435a755ba572⋯.jpg (274.11 KB,1080x720,3:2,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 4e17a1a28823e4f⋯.jpg (680.26 KB,4500x2531,4500:2531,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23767831 (251224ZOCT25) Notable: ‘He watched me beg for my life. Even in Australia, I couldn’t escape Epstein and my abusers’ – In this extract from her memoir, Virginia Giuffre writes that even after taking refuge in Australia, she could not escape Jeffrey Epstein and her abusers.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122204

>>122391

>>122392

>>122400

‘He watched me beg for my life. Even in Australia, I couldn’t escape Epstein and my abusers’

In this extract from her memoir, Virginia Giuffre writes that even after taking refuge in Australia, she could not escape Jeffrey Epstein and her abusers.

Virginia Roberts Giuffre - October 24, 2025

1/2

When I picture myself during my first few days in Australia, I have to laugh. I am standing behind the stove in my in-laws’ kitchen, learning how to make coffee the Italian way, one strong cup at a time. I pour water into a tiny silver percolator, then spoon finely ground coffee into the sieve-like reservoir through which hot water will soon flow.

It’s a cozy scene, except for what I’m wearing: a skimpy undershirt and Daisy Duke cut-off shorts with my thong underwear protruding from the waistband. To see me, you might think I’m trying to show off my body, but that isn’t right. While in Jeffrey Epstein’s employ, I’d been encouraged to wear clothes that made me look even younger than I was. Now, no longer Epstein’s captive, I was a wife – a grown woman. But I still felt – and dressed – like a teenage girl. I didn’t have the slightest idea how an adult version of me should look.

When I moved into Frank and Nina’s house, that was just the beginning of what I didn’t know. I had never loaded a dishwasher, for example, or scrambled an egg or separated laundry into darks and lights. I’d never opened a bank account or filed income taxes or made a good cup of coffee – the list went on and on. Sometimes the weight of my ignorance overwhelmed me. What is adulthood, I wondered, and will I ever master it? What is it to be a wife? It would take time for me to figure out the answers.

Our first weekend in Australia, Robbie took me camping in Hunter Valley, north of Sydney, with a group of his friends. The place is one of the country’s major wine regions, but we had so little money that Robbie decreed we were there to rough it and enjoy the natural beauty, not to sip Shiraz. I was good with that until I saw where we were sleeping: a ramshackle shed. That weekend was quite an introduction to my new country. Yes, we saw a few Aboriginal cave paintings, but the weather was freezing and the only kangaroo we spotted appeared to have been dead for months.

A few days after our return, I fell terribly ill with some sort of flu. When I spiked a fever, Robbie was at work – he’d gotten a construction job. I felt awful: clammy and hot. I didn’t want to be a pain in anyone’s ass, and – especially since I’d just learned the Aussie phrase “having a whinge” (complaining for no reason) – I was determined to be stoic. But when Robbie’s dad discovered how sick I was, he swung into action, whipping up his special zuppa di lenticchie, or lentil soup.

I was too weak to get out of bed, but Frank propped me up on my pillows and then sat beside me, feeding me spoonfuls until I was full.

Later, as I passed in and out of a sweaty, delirious sleep, he returned every few minutes to cool my forehead with a damp cloth. When my fever broke, Frank brought me coffee that was creamy from the raw egg he’d stirred into it.

He didn’t say much, just as Robbie had warned that he wouldn’t, but in those first weeks that I was in Sydney, Frank gave me more nurturing than I ever got from my own father.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122447

File: ed58d0c0c5a3c90⋯.jpg (173.15 KB,852x376,213:94,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 4a7ac66d74092c2⋯.jpg (335.55 KB,825x674,825:674,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 53a9f784f5bd311⋯.jpg (322.52 KB,852x725,852:725,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 2fd7cf0e5d24867⋯.jpg (615.68 KB,991x1383,991:1383,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 87763447066776d⋯.jpg (304.57 KB,942x942,1:1,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23767886 (251242ZOCT25) Notable: Q Post #1001 - Where do roads lead? Each prince is associated with a cardinal direction: north, south, east and west. Sacrifice. Collect. [Classified]-1 - [Classified]-2 - Tunnels. Table 29. - D-Room H - D-Room R - D-Room C - Pure EVIL. - 'Conspiracy' - Q - https://qanon.pub/#1001

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122204

>>122391

>>122392

>>122400

>>122446

Q Post #4923

Oct 21 2020 20:55:05 (EST)

https://twitter.com/VRSVirginia/status/1319071346282778624

Dearest Virginia -

We stand with you.

Now and always.

Find peace through prayer.

Never give up the good fight.

God bless you.

Q

https://qanon.pub/#4923

https://qanon.pub/#4568

Q Post #1001

Apr 3 2018 20:11:01 (EST)

Where do roads lead?

Each prince is associated with a cardinal direction: north, south, east and west.

Sacrifice.

Collect.

[Classified]-1

[Classified]-2

Tunnels.

Table 29.

D-Room H

D-Room R

D-Room C

Pure EVIL.

'Conspiracy'

Q

https://qanon.pub/#1001

>Pure EVIL.

>'Conspiracy'

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122448

File: d34affab571ea82⋯.jpg (341.73 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23771419 (260840ZOCT25) Notable: Anthony Albanese heads to Malaysia and South Korea for major summits – Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has departed for Malaysia and South Korea to attend high-level summits with dozens of world leaders, including US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping. Calling the meetings “a critical time” for the Indo-Pacific, he said one in four Australian jobs rely on trade and that he would prioritise expanding economic and security partnerships. The ASEAN and APEC gatherings will centre on regional stability, trade growth, and global cooperation, with the Xi–Trump meeting expected to address China’s stated aim to “reunify” Taiwan by 2027. Mr Albanese said stronger global collaboration “reduces trade barriers” and “enlivens competition.”

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122412

Anthony Albanese heads to Malaysia and South Korea for major summits

SARAH ISON - 25 October 2025

Anthony Albanese will travel to Malaysia and South Korea for a series of high level summits with dozens of other world leaders, declaring the meetings are taking place at “a critical time” in the region.

As major leaders from across the globe, including Donald Trump, head for Kuala Lumpur to attend Association of Southeast Asian Nations before going to South Korea for meeting of the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation, the Prime Minister said the trip represented a key opportunity for Australia.

“One in four Australian jobs rely on trade and we will be focused on continuing to grow our key economic and trade relationships during ASEAN and APEC,” he said, ahead of his departure.

“Australia is working with regional leaders, including through ASEAN, the East Asia Summit and APEC to support economic growth, security, and stability in the region.”

One of the most highly anticipated elements of the week will be a meeting between Mr Trump and Chinese president Xi Jinping in Gyeongju, South Korea, scheduled for Thursday.

Issues including China’s desire to “reunify” Taiwan with the mainland by 2027 – and potentially pull other countries into regional conflict – are due to be discussed among leaders.

Aside from attending multilateral events, Mr Albanese will also have one-on-one meetings with leaders also attending the summits, but has not confirmed another meeting with Mr Trump after his White House visit this week.

The focus of the international meetings will be advocating for “a peaceful, stable and prosperous region” as well as advancing Australia’s growing trade and investment interests.

“Strengthening economic collaboration with our global partners at APEC maximises opportunities for Australian business and workers, reducing trade barriers and enlivening competition,” Mr Albanese said.

“These forums come at a critical time. I look forward to engaging with our partners on trade, security and global challenges.”

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/anthony-albanese-heads-to-malaysia-and-south-korea-for-major-summits/news-story/0b38890109886d31fe18764d249fc923

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122449

File: e1be89e5f504928⋯.jpg (521.69 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 92bf28a83ce8ab0⋯.jpg (233.88 KB,2047x1152,2047:1152,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23771439 (260913ZOCT25) Notable: Donald Trump’s AUKUS nod echoed as new sub welcomed – The USS Utah, the 28th Virginia-class submarine, has been christened in Connecticut, with senior US officials reaffirming the strength of AUKUS and the deepening of defence ties with Australia. Congressman Joe Courtney said the partnership was helping expand America’s submarine industrial base and create jobs, adding that “our closest allies — Australia and the United Kingdom — are locking arms with us as never before.” He cited Donald Trump’s recent endorsement of AUKUS as validation of billions invested in the sector. US Navy Secretary John Phelan called the Virginia-class fleet “the undersea workhorse,” essential to deterrence and maintaining open sea lanes.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122412

>>122417

>>122429

Donald Trump’s AUKUS nod echoed as new sub welcomed

JOE KELLY - 26 October 2025

Australia and the US’s deepening defence ties will help the superpower build up its submarine industrial base and create hundreds of US jobs, one of Anthony Albanese’s biggest supporters in congress has said at the christening ceremony of the USS Utah.

The Utah, the 28th submarine in the Virginia-class program, was christened at 10am on Saturday local time at the General Dynamics Electric Boat shipyards in Groton, Connecticut, with the company’s president, Mark Rayha, welcoming attendees to the “submarine capital of the world”.

Sketching out the complexity of the submarine building endeavour, he said it was like “bringing a grand piano into your house through an upstairs window, rigging it through the house without any apparatus that was there to begin with, bringing it down and installing it in your basement without a scratch to the piano or any walls or any floors in the house. It’s amazing.”

The Democratic congressman representing Connecticut’s 2nd district, which includes Groton, Joe Courtney, is the party’s ranking member of the house seapower subcommittee. He said the christening of the USS Utah came when the US congress’s “demand signal for new submarines is at an all-time high”.

“In addition to modernising the US submarine force, our closest allies – Australia and the United Kingdom – are locking arms with us as never before, to strengthen and expand undersea supremacy to ensure a free and open Indo-Pacific,” he said.

Mr Courtney, the co-chair of the Friends of Australia caucus, said the USS Utah would be the “28th Virginia-class submarine in the fleet, and there are now 15 more under contract or construction, as well as three Columbia ballistic subs”.

He says he is also optimistic that the US can lift its submarine production rate, with it aiming to meet the target of producing the required 2.33 Virginia-class submarines a year. This is the rate needed to replace the boats sold to Australia.

Mr Courtney has noted that later this year, the future USS Massachusetts and USS Idaho would be commissioned into the US submarine force while, in 2026, the USS Arkansas and the USS Utah were expected to be delivered.

More than $10bn has already been directed to the US submarine industrial base since 2018, with Mr Courtney saying the seapower subcommittee would continue to make the case for continued investment.

Mr Courtney used his speech to make clear that Donald Trump’s endorsement of the AUKUS agreement in his White House meeting with Anthony Albanese last week was a key moment.

“The welcome announcement this past Monday by the Trump administration that the four-year-old AUKUS security agreement will continue ‘full steam ahead’ validates the billions congress invested to grow our submarine industrial base over the last six years, including long overdue wage improvement funding passed last December,” he said.

US Secretary of the Navy John Phelan said the Virginia-class submarine was the US “undersea fleet’s multi-mission workhorse”.

“It hunts and defeats enemy submarines and surface ships, projects power ashore, conducts ISR (intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance) in the world’s most contested waters, and enables long-range precision strikes,” he said.

He said submarines were critical to deterring war, upholding the rules-based order and keeping sea lanes open while making clear that boosting the submarine industrial base was a key priority of the Trump administration.

“We are asking more of the industrial base because the world is asking more of the US,” he said. “Meeting that demand is how we preserve the peace.”

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/defence/donald-trumps-aukus-nod-echoed-as-new-sub-welcomed/news-story/f032e12c02a9d47df75d4938f13de08e

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122450

File: e6d7a2e659930c6⋯.jpg (261.59 KB,1280x720,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23771442 (260919ZOCT25) Notable: Eddie McGuire urges Melbourne to follow Los Angeles’ path on safety revival – Eddie McGuire says Melbourne should consider a Los Angeles-style crackdown on crime to revive its struggling city centre, warning that safety fears and constant protests are deterring workers and visitors. “If you make it safer to get there… and you don’t feel like you’re going to get robbed on the train,” he said, “it makes a huge difference.” McGuire praised LA’s recent policing boost as a model for Melbourne, where weekday CBD activity has stalled at 52 per cent of pre-pandemic levels. He cautioned against blanket protest bans but said weekly stand-offs were “too much.” The Allan government has introduced bail reforms and bans on machetes amid rising crime.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122384

>>122398

>>122399

>>122401

Eddie McGuire urges Melbourne to follow Los Angeles’ path on safety revival

ANTHONY GALLOWAY - 26 October 2025

1/2

Eddie McGuire says Melbourne may need a Los Angeles-style crackdown on crime to encourage people back into the city ­centre.

While the city remains electric at night and during major events, Mr McGuire said weekday activity in the city centre had lagged since Covid lockdowns reshaped working habits, while the recent crime wave and protests were discouraging people from going into the CBD during the day.

The former Collingwood president and Channel Nine chief executive said crime was a problem in every big city around the world but Melbourne needed to “not let standards diminish”.

“I don’t think you have to be an urban planning genius to come up with the fact that if you make it safer to get there, and easier to get in and out and you don’t feel like you’re going to get robbed on the train leaving the place – it makes it easier,” Mr McGuire told The Australian.

“If people are feeling comfortable and confident in their city and their safety, it makes a huge difference.”

Melbourne’s CBD has been repeatedly disrupted by protests and an uptick in violent crimes. Demonstrators have occupied city streets most Sundays for the past two years. Last weekend, hundreds of police officers were deployed to separate a March for Australia rally from an “anti-­racism” counter-protest, during which rocks and bottles were thrown, injuring two officers.

Meanwhile, worker activity in the CBD has flatlined at about 52 per cent of pre-pandemic levels for more than two years, compared with Sydney’s steady climb to around 75 per cent by early 2025, according to research by data firm Propella AI.

Mr McGuire, who sits on the board of Visit Victoria, said public safety and city revitalisation were intertwined.

He pointed to the example of Los Angeles, which started to get on top of its crime problem over the past two years after a significant boost to police resources and large-scale operations targeting organised retail crime.

“Los Angeles went through this two years ago,” Mr McGuire said.

“They said: ‘Right, OK, what do we need to do?’ And the first answer was: ‘We’ve got to make the place safe’... And as a result, it’s had the knock-on effect of people suddenly coming back there again.

“I think the key thing is, we know what the issue is. Now we have to address it.”

The latest Crime Statistics Agency’s annual data for the year to June 30 revealed criminal incidents in Victoria jumped 18.3 per cent, the highest since records began in 2004. The Allan government has responded with two tranches of bail reform, a ban on machetes, new laws to crack down on violent protesters and a restructure of Victoria Police to get more officers on the streets.

Premier Jacinta Allan on Sunday said her government’s changes were making a difference, but conceded more actions may be needed to respond to a new pattern of “violent, brazen ­offending”.

While the youth crime wave and weekly protests are separate issues, many fear the combination has created a perfect storm for community safety concerns.

Restaurateur Chris Lucas has called for a temporary ban on protests in the CBD, saying the city was “not safe” and weekly demonstrations were damaging business and tourism.

Mr McGuire said he was wary of blanket bans but conceded the city could not keep tolerating weekend stand-offs.

“The only people who listen to bans are law-abiding citizens,” he said. “We want people to be able to protest, but when it gets to what’s happening at the moment where it’s not a protest as such, it’s a weekly sport to go and shut down the city (it’s too much),” he said.

“And you really feel for people who’ve invested in these areas and can’t get people in. Chris Lucas says he can’t get staff in … it’s hard.

“I don’t think there’s any doubt that the protesting on the weekend doesn’t encourage anyone to really want to go to the city.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122451

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23771455 (260930ZOCT25) Notable: ‘I don’t forget’: Trump casts doubt on Rudd forgiveness – (Video) US President Donald Trump has suggested he has not forgiven Australian ambassador Kevin Rudd, saying he “doesn’t forget” past criticism in which Rudd labelled him “a traitor to the West” and “the most destructive president in history.” During Prime Minister Anthony Albanese’s meeting at the White House, Trump told Rudd, “I don’t like you either. And I probably never will,” though later said Rudd “seemed like a good guy.” Speaking before leaving for Asia, Trump said he would soon appoint a new US ambassador to Australia, one Albanese “will like.”

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122412

>>122413

>>122415

>>122424

>>122426

‘I don’t forget’: Trump casts doubt on Rudd forgiveness

Michael Koziol - October 25, 2025

1/2

Washington: US President Donald Trump has cast doubt on his forgiveness of Australian ambassador Kevin Rudd, saying he doesn’t forget criticism of him, while promising to appoint his own ambassador to Australia once he finds someone Prime Minister Anthony Albanese will “like”.

Rudd was dressed down by Trump during Albanese’s meeting with the US president this week, after a reporter asked Trump about old comments Rudd made – before he was ambassador – describing Trump as “a traitor to the West” and “the most destructive president in history”.

Trump indicated he was not familiar with Rudd or the remarks. “You said bad?” he asked Rudd. “Before I took this job, Mr President,” Rudd replied. Trump then said: “I don’t like you either. And I probably never will.”

It was not entirely clear whether the president was being serious. But Albanese said that later, as the cameras were leaving the room, Trump remarked that Rudd seemed like a “good guy” and told him “all is forgiven”.

However, as Trump was leaving the White House for Asia late on Friday night (Saturday afternoon AEDT), he indicated that he would not forget Rudd’s remarks.

“No, I don’t know anything about him,” Trump said when asked by this masthead about his interaction with Rudd and whether he had forgiven the Australian. “I don’t – I think he said a long time ago something bad. You know, when they say bad about me, I don’t forget.”

It was not clear whether Trump had fully heard and understood the question, given the loud noise from Marine One – the presidential helicopter – nearby.

Trump also told this masthead he would soon appoint a new US ambassador to Australia – a post that has been empty for nearly a year – and had at least one candidate in mind.

“I’m talking to your leader [Albanese], who was just here, and he’s a great guy, and I’m going to make sure we have somebody that he likes,” Trump said.

“I have one or two people [in mind], I don’t know if they would like – I do, I have somebody in mind.

“Here’s the good news, everybody wants to be ambassador to Australia.”

The position of US ambassador to Australia has generally been regarded as a desirable position, as is Australia’s ambassador to the US, and is often filled by a political or business associate of the president of the day, rather than a career diplomat.

But this has frequently involved long gaps without an ambassador. Joe Biden’s appointment, Caroline Kennedy, the only surviving child of former president John F. Kennedy and Jacqueline Kennedy, took up her post in July 2022 and served for less than 2½ years.

Since Kennedy vacated the post in November 2024, there has been no US ambassador to Australia, with the role filled in the interim by Chargée d’Affaires Erika Olson.

There has been speculation Trump could appoint a Hollywood identity, such as American-born, Australian-raised actor Mel Gibson, to the role.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122452

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23771466 (260941ZOCT25) Notable: Video: Ambassador Kevin Rudd denies tense exchanges with Trump officials as US President says he ‘doesn’t forget’ critics – Kevin Rudd has denied reports of “testy” meetings with senior Trump officials, after US President Donald Trump said he “doesn’t forget” people who criticise him. Sources claimed Rudd clashed with Trump aides Stephen Miller and Elbridge Colby, but the ambassador called such claims “completely false.” Government sources noted Rudd hosted US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and Senator Marco Rubio after the White House meeting, showing “ongoing goodwill.” During that meeting, Trump told Rudd, “I don’t like you and probably never will.” Despite tensions, the summit delivered major outcomes, including an $8.5 billion critical minerals deal and reaffirmed US commitment to AUKUS.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122412

>>122413

>>122415

>>122424

>>122426

>>122451

Ambassador Kevin Rudd denies tense exchanges with Trump officials as US President says he ‘doesn’t forget’ critics

Ambassador Kevin Rudd has denied having testy exchanges with the Trump administration, as the US President revealed he “doesn’t forget” people who criticise him.

Oscar Godsell and Andrew Clennell - October 26, 2025

Australian Ambassador to the United States Kevin Rudd has denied that he has had tense exchanges with senior members of the Trump administration.

One source confirmed to Sky News that heated meetings have occurred, but the Australian government has flatly denied it.

The denials follow comments from US President Donald Trump suggesting he “doesn’t forget” people who have previously said bad things about him.

Mr Rudd was sprayed by President Trump during the White House meeting with the US president last Monday, after Sky News asked about old comments Mr Rudd had made.

Reports later emerged Mr Rudd was involved in “testy” exchanges with senior Trump allies, including strategist Stephen Miller and defence expert Elbridge Colby.

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese’s biographer, Karen Middleton, wrote in The Monthly that Mr Colby expressed “personal antipathy” toward Rudd.

Mr Miller allegedly “eviscerated” Mr Rudd and suggested there was “little interest” from the White House in engaging with the Australian envoy.

Through a spokeswoman, Mr Rudd described any claims of confrontation as “completely false”.

Government sources also pointed out that Mr Rudd hosted US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and Senator Marco Rubio for several hours at his residence in Washington.

That meeting occurred the night after the Trump–Albanese meeting—a signal which they said showed ongoing goodwill.

During the White House meeting last Monday, President Trump told Mr Rudd that he doesn’t like him and probably never will.

Before he was ambassador, the former prime minister described President Trump as “a traitor to the West” and “the most destructive president in history”.

Sources inside the government later claimed that US leader said all was forgiven, but he has subsequently cast doubt on that sentiment.

“I think he said a long time ago something bad. You know, when they say bad (things) about me, I don’t forget” President Trump said on Saturday when asked by reporters.

Despite the diplomatic friction, the meeting between Prime Minister Albanese and President Trump delivered significant policy outcomes.

Both leaders unveiled an $8.5 billion critical minerals pipeline, with Australia and the US each contributing $1 billion to boost rare earths and strategic minerals supply chains.

President Trump also reaffirmed that the AUKUS submarine partnership would proceed “full steam ahead, praising Mr Albanese as a “great guy” and “respected” leader.

A White House statement also mentioned a $1.4 trillion Australian superannuation investment figure, although this was not raised at the press conference.

Australian officials later clarified that the figure reflected private sector activity previously discussed at an investor forum attended by the Prime Minister.

The bilateral White House meeting came after months of speculation that Mr Rudd’s strained relationship with President Trump had delayed Mr Albanese’s invitation.

In June, President Trump’s former pollster Brent Buchanan told Sky News that Mr Rudd was “a major barrier” to securing a meeting.

He argued that President Trump needed to “find an Australian that he likes” to be the US Ambassador.

Following President Trump’s election in November 2024, Mr Rudd deleted insulting social media posts and issued a statement expressing respect for the US President.

At that time, senior Trump advisor Dan Scavino posted a draining hour glass in response to Mr Rudd—appearing to suggest the ambassador's days may be numbered.

Back in Canberra, Opposition Leader Sussan Ley reignited calls for Mr Rudd to be replaced as ambassador, describing him as a “distraction”.

Ms Ley has maintained that Mr Rudd would not be renewed in the ambassador role under a future Coalition government.

However, Liberal Party colleagues Andrew Hastie and Jane Hume distanced themselves from that position.

Mr Albanese has also defended his envoy, saying that Mr Rudd “works his guts out” and remains one of the most active foreign representatives on Capitol Hill.

https://www.skynews.com.au/australia-news/politics/ambassador-kevin-rudd-denies-tense-exchanges-with-trump-officials-as-us-president-says-he-doesnt-forget-critics/news-story/6495167a0aaf611e651b2732db484cd4

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FaAswJAAEMI

https://www.themonthly.com.au/karen-middleton/2025-10-23/kevin-can-wait

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122453

File: 034900374a8f823⋯.jpg (41.88 KB,634x350,317:175,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 59622015310d6bc⋯.jpg (103.16 KB,634x951,2:3,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 2f0b62a75b06672⋯.jpg (910.85 KB,3600x2400,3:2,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23771501 (261010ZOCT25) Notable: Email reveals Epstein used Andrew as fixer to lure Australian PM’s daughter to mansion – Newly revealed emails show Jeffrey Epstein asked Prince Andrew to arrange a dinner with Katherine Keating, daughter of former Australian prime minister Paul Keating. In a February 2011 message, Epstein wrote: “Would you ask Katherine Keating if she would like to come for dinner with Woody Allen next week in New York?” to which Andrew replied, “Will do.” Ms Keating confirmed she attended the dinner at Andrew’s invitation, describing it as “a large social event” with prominent media figures present. She denied any wrongdoing or knowledge of Epstein’s crimes. The revelation comes amid renewed scrutiny of Andrew’s continued contact with Epstein after claiming to have cut ties.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122346

>>122371

>>122393

>>122394

>>122395

Email reveals Epstein used Andrew as fixer to lure Australian PM's daughter to mansion

'CAROLINE GRAHAM - 26 October 2025

Convicted paedophile Jeffrey Epstein asked Prince Andrew to arrange a dinner with the attractive daughter of the former Australian prime minister, The Mail on Sunday can reveal.

In an email dated February 16, 2011 – part of The Epstein Files currently being reviewed by the US Congress – Epstein wrote to Andrew saying: 'Would you ask Katherine Keating if she would like to come for dinner with Woody Allen next week in New York?' to which the prince replied: 'Will do.'

Two days later, on the eve of Andrew's 51st birthday, Epstein wrote: 'What will you do tomorrow? Sorry I cannot be there as you get older.'

Andrew responded: 'Having a very quiet day. But a dinner party in the evening. On the Keating case.'

Socialite Ms Keating, who was 29 at the time, is the daughter of Paul Keating, the Australian PM from 1991 to 1996 who was dubbed 'The Lizard of Oz' in 1992 when he placed his arm around Queen Elizabeth.

Ms Keating confirmed Andrew 'fixed' her 2011 dinner with Epstein.

Addressing her links to Epstein for the first time she told the MoS: 'I did attend a February dinner at Andrew's invitation – a large social event.'

The brunette was famously photographed waving goodbye to Andrew two months earlier when he stayed at Epstein's New York mansion and the financier hosted another dinner.

Ms Keating, now 44, said: 'It was a large social event. A sizable chunk of NY society was there, including [American broadcasters] Barbara Walters, Charlie Rose and Katie Couric.

'At the time, I had only lived in NY about ten weeks, and was happy to accept the odd social invitation.'

It is not suggested that Ms Keating engaged in, or had any knowledge of, any improper or illegal conduct by Epstein or any of his associates.

Andrew told Emily Maitlis during his infamous Newsnight interview that he had visited Epstein in New York to break off contact.

The pair were pictured in Central Park together during that visit.

The MoS recently revealed that, despite those claims Andrew continued to keep in touch with Epstein, promising to 'play some more soon' in one 2011 email.

It is not known how Ms Keating came into Andrew's orbit.

Some reports have suggested she was friends with Andrew's friend and Epstein's 'madam' Ghislaine Maxwell, currently serving 20 years for sex trafficking.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/royals/article-15227281/Email-Epstein-used-Andrew-lure-Australian-PM-daughter-mansion.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122454

File: f707e68c29d5fb4⋯.mp4 (8.17 MB,640x360,16:9,Clipboard.mp4)

File: 1d2c1830a077a03⋯.gif (1.01 MB,739x493,739:493,Clipboard.gif)

File: 62081534e126d14⋯.jpg (457.92 KB,2576x1992,322:249,Clipboard.jpg)

File: f3568c3f73db092⋯.jpg (487.44 KB,2647x1765,2647:1765,Clipboard.jpg)

File: a3907d91c861633⋯.jpg (1.56 MB,1213x2638,1213:2638,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23775854 (270902ZOCT25) Notable: Video: Mossad names mastermind of Australian antisemitic attacks – Israel’s Mossad has identified Sardar Amar, a senior Iranian Revolutionary Guard commander, as the figure behind the 2024 arson attacks on Melbourne’s Adass Israel Synagogue and Sydney’s Lewis’ Continental Kitchen. The Albanese government expelled Iran’s ambassador and moved to list the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps as a terrorist organisation following ASIO’s findings linking Iran to the attacks. Mossad said Amar oversaw a network promoting global assaults on Jewish targets, including foiled operations in Greece and Germany. Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke called Iran’s actions “disgraceful.” ASIO Director-General Mike Burgess said the IRGC used proxies to conceal involvement, adding Iran “literally and figuratively lit the matches.”

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109584 (pb)

>>109585 (pb)

>>122206

Mossad names mastermind of Australian antisemitic attacks

Matthew Knott - October 27, 2025

Israeli spy agency Mossad has named the Iranian Revolutionary Guard commander it says was behind attacks on Jewish sites in Sydney and Melbourne, as well as other violent incidents in other countries.

In a rare statement, the secretive foreign intelligence service identified Sardar Amar, a senior commander in the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps, as the official who ordered the 2024 arson attacks on the Adass Israel Synagogue in Melbourne and Lewis’ Continental Kitchen in Sydney.

The Albanese government expelled Iran’s ambassador to Australia and decided to list the IRGC as a terrorist organisation after domestic spy agency ASIO revealed it believed Iran was behind the attacks.

The legislation to allow the government to list government entities like the IRGC as terrorist organisations is set to be introduced into Parliament on Tuesday.

In a statement uploaded to its website, Mossad said: “Under Amar’s command, a significant mechanism was established to promote attacks against Israeli and Jewish targets both in Israel and abroad.

“This mechanism is directly responsible for the attempted attacks exposed in Greece, Australia, and Germany in the past year alone, and its numerous failures led to the wave of arrests and its exposure.”

The Mossad statement continued: “For years, the Iranian regime has viewed terrorism as a tool to exact a price from Israel by harming innocent people worldwide, without paying military, diplomatic, or economic costs.

“Under this logic, the terrorist bodies operate while maintaining plausible deniability and a separation between the violent activity and Iran ... The Mossad, together with its partners in Israel and around the world, will act decisively to thwart terrorist threats from Iran and its proxies, and to protect the citizens of Israel and Jewish communities around the globe.”

The agency said co-operation with international partners “thwarted dozens of attack tracks, saving many lives”.

The Mossad reportedly provided information that helped ASIO with its inquiries into the firebombings, but the vast majority of the investigation was conducted by ASIO investigators.

Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke said: “Iran’s behaviour was disgraceful. That’s why we expelled the ambassador and are introducing legislation which would create the power to list organisations connected to a government as a terrorist organisation.

“Our government makes decisions on the basis of intelligence assessments by our agencies.”

The agency has also linked Ammar to attacks on an Israeli-owned hotel and a synagogue in central Athens in July 2024, while in July 2025, Danish police also arrested a man suspected of gathering information on Jewish properties in Berlin “presumably in preparation for further intelligence activities in Germany, possibly including terrorist attacks on Jewish targets”.

At the time, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese described the attacks in Sydney and Melbourne as “extraordinary and dangerous acts of aggression orchestrated by a foreign nation on Australian soil”.

“They were attempts to undermine social cohesion and sow discord in our community,” he said. “It is totally unacceptable.”

ASIO director-general Mike Burgess said that the revolutionary guard had used “a complex web of proxies” to hide its involvement in antisemitic attacks on Australian soil.

He said he did not believe Iran was responsible for all antisemitic attacks in Australia, but it might be responsible for more than the two that had been announced.

“Iran and its proxies literally and figuratively lit the matches and fanned the flames,” he said.

https://www.theage.com.au/politics/federal/mossad-ids-mastermind-of-australian-antisemitic-attacks-20251027-p5n5h7.html

https://www.9news.com.au/world/iran-australia-sardar-amar-israel-benjamin-netanyahu/97399c0b-24da-4610-bf6a-84360867772b

https://www.gov.il/en/pages/spoke-mossad261025

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122455

File: 361a1f56bc53cf2⋯.jpg (348.1 KB,2063x1375,2063:1375,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 935efe0b23bfd3c⋯.jpg (3.2 MB,6000x4000,3:2,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23775891 (270913ZOCT25) Notable: Palestinian Authority calls for Australian troops to help secure Gaza peace – The Palestinian Authority has urged Australia to join an international peacekeeping force in Gaza, with deputy foreign minister Omar Awadallah saying Australia could assist “by sending forces, by sending experts, by supporting the training of Palestinian security personnel.” He said an Australian presence would assure Palestinians the force sought “to stabilise the situation, not… another kind of occupation.” Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said Australia would consider contributions, having already sent an ADF liaison officer to the US-led coordination centre in Israel. Awadallah said there was “no role for Hamas” in post-war Gaza and welcomed Australia’s recognition of Palestinian statehood, calling it “of great importance.”

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122289

>>122294

>>122298

>>122322

>>122354

Palestinian Authority calls for Australian troops to help secure Gaza peace

Matthew Knott - October 26, 2025

1/2

The Palestinian Authority has called for Australia to play a significant role in an international stabilisation force in Gaza, including sending peacekeeping troops to help establish law and order in the ravaged enclave.

The Palestinian Authority’s deputy foreign minister, Omar Awadallah, said it was vital for the international community to move quickly to establish a United Nations-endorsed peacekeeping force to ensure the fragile ceasefire did not collapse and that Israeli troops withdraw from almost all of the Gaza Strip.

US President Donald Trump would deserve a Nobel Peace Prize if he was able to secure a long-term peace in Gaza after two years of ferocious Israeli bombardments, he added.

“I think Australia can help in so many aspects, including by sending forces, by sending experts, by supporting the training of Palestinian security personnel,” Awadallah told this masthead from the de facto Palestinian capital of Ramallah.

“We believe that we need to see principled countries like Australia [involved in a stabilisation force] because we don’t want any kind of a trusteeship or new kind of occupation for the Palestinian territory.”

An Australian presence would help convince Palestinians that the stabilisation force is “really coming to stabilise the situation, not to have another kind of occupation” in Gaza, he said.

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said the government would consider ways Australia could contribute to an international stabilisation force in Gaza.

The government said last week it would send an Australian Defence Force liaison officer to the US-led Civil-Military Coordination Centre in Israel to help contribute to efforts to stabilise the region.

The Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade was contacted for comment.

The Palestinian Authority – which represents Palestine in international forums such as the UN and governs parts of the West Bank – is dominated by the secular-nationalist Fatah party.

Fatah is a more moderate rival to the listed terror group Hamas, which took control of the Gaza Strip in 2007 and launched the shock October 7 attacks on Israel that killed an estimated 1200 people.

Speaking during a visit to Israel at the weekend, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio said that “a lot of countries” had offered to be part of an international security force for Gaza and that it would come into effect “as soon as it possibly can”.

The United Nations has previously deployed peacekeepers to try to maintain ceasefires between Israel and Lebanon and Israel and Syria, but not in the West Bank or Gaza since 1967, the year Israel took control of the territories.

Asked about post-war governance in Gaza, Awadallah said: “There is no role for Hamas. They accepted Trump’s plan, and that makes clear they have nothing to do with governance and security in Gaza.”

He said the Palestinian Authority had committed to hold elections next year in what would be the first such poll in more than two decades.

“We want your support, we want your help,” Awadallah said, requesting Australian assistance for the electoral process.

However, he added that it was crucial for Palestinians living in East Jerusalem to be able to participate in the democratic process for the elections to be legitimate.

Israel considers all of Jerusalem its undivided capital, complicating efforts to hold Palestinian elections in the holy city.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122456

File: 6d31a3cf7e50a5b⋯.jpg (134.82 KB,1440x810,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 495b63f3945b678⋯.jpg (123.22 KB,1279x720,1279:720,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23775923 (270920ZOCT25) Notable: Japan’s ‘Iron Lady’ Sanae Takaichi urges closer ties with Australia to counter China – Prime Minister Anthony Albanese met Japan’s new leader, Sanae Takaichi, on the sidelines of the ASEAN summit, where she urged that Japan and Australia “spearhead efforts” for a free and open Indo-Pacific and deepen cooperation beyond the Quad. Ms Takaichi, Japan’s first female prime minister, said both nations had “the will and capacity” to realise this vision. Mr Albanese said the two countries stood for “freedom in the Pacific” and highlighted Australia’s purchase of Mogami-class frigates. As Mr Trump and Xi Jinping prepare for their summit in South Korea, Canberra and Tokyo are strengthening strategic ties amid rising tensions over China’s regional ambitions.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122448

Japan’s ‘Iron Lady’ Sanae Takaichi urges closer ties with Australia to counter China

SARAH ISON and BEN PACKHAM - 26 October 2025

1/2

Anthony Albanese and Japan’s new “Iron Lady”, Sanae Takaichi, have discussed the strategic threat posed by China in their first meeting on Sunday night, with the new Japanese Prime Minister saying the nations should “spearhead efforts” to create free and open Indo-Pacific.

In a bilateral meeting that began with Ms Takaichi rushing towards Mr Albanese and declaring she was “very sorry” for running late, Japan’s first female leader made clear her intention to see Canberra and Tokyo increase their strategic cooperation in the region.

“We would like to promote strategic cooperation with Australia, in addition to the existing Quad collaboration,” the China hawk said.

Her comments come as the Quad – which includes India, Japan, Australia and the US – has come under a cloud since Donald Trump took office.

Mr Albanese landed in Kuala Lumpur for the annual ASEAN summit hours after ­Mr Trump touched down in the Malaysian capital ahead of a showdown between the US president and Xi Jinping over their escalating trade war.

Mr Albanese will meet a raft of regional leaders this week in ­Malaysia and at his next stop, South Korea, which is hosting this year’s APEC summit and Mr Trump’s meeting with Mr Xi on Thursday.

Ms Takaichi is set to become one of Mr Albanese’s most important strategic partners, with the new leader of Australia’s “quasi ally” pushing to elevate the Quad security dialogue, and putting a “free and open Indo-­Pacific” at the top of her international agenda.

“I … hope that our two countries can spearhead efforts so that we can push a free and open Indo-Pacific,” Ms Takaichi told Mr Albanese on the sidelines of the ASEAN summit.

“Japan and Australia both have the will and capacity to realise these aspirations.”

After congratulating Ms Takaichi for winning office earlier this week, Mr Albanese said both countries stood for “freedom in the Pacific and in our region”.

“Our recent decision to purchase the Mogami frigates just takes that defence and security relationship to another level,” he said.

Japan’s former ambassador to Australia, Shingo Yamagami, said ahead of the bilateral meeting that Ms Takaichi would highlight the country’s experience as a “frontline state” in “having dealt with Beijing’s strategic challenges”.

“Australia has been ­enjoying, relatively speaking, the luxury of long distance. But we have been living in the tyranny of proximity,” he said.

“So I think Takaichi’s views on China could be very, very eye-opening for Anthony Albanese.”

Mr Yamagami, a former Japanese national security chief who has been informally advising Ms Takaichi, predicted Australia-Japan ties would become even closer in the coming years, with closer intelligence sharing on the agenda.

“There is a lot Australia can offer in helping Japan improve its intelligence and counterintelligence capabilities,” he said.

Mr Xi is yet to publicly congratulate Ms Takaichi since her confirmation as Prime Minister last week, amid warnings she intends to ramp up Japan’s defence spending and deepen ties with the US.

Ms Takaichi said she would be discussing how to advance “peace and prosperity” in the region in her meetings with counterparts, including Mr Albanese.

“I intend to use this opportunity to deepen mutual trust with leaders of ASEAN and to achieve significant results,” she said before departing for Malaysia.

Mr Albanese will use the ASEAN summit to unveil more than $250m in funding for initiatives aimed at attracting more investment from a region that is forecast to become, collectively, the fourth biggest global economy by 2040.

China’s role in Southeast Asia will feature heavily at the ASEAN and APEC summits.

Beijing’s firing of flares at an Australian surveillance aircraft flying over the South China Sea last week will be a key behind-the-scenes talking point for Mr Albanese, while China’s critical minerals dispute is being closely watched by the world amid fears of a global economic shock. Ms Takaichi will meet with Mr Trump later in the week in Tokyo, but is not expected to meet with Mr Xi.

China’s rare-earths export controls are set to be the focus of the Trump-Xi meeting, with the US having signed a $US8.5bn ($13bn) critical minerals deal with Australia last week to overcome China’s dominance of the sector.

US officials met with their Chinese counterparts ahead of Mr Trump’s arrival in Malaysia to discuss the export controls and Washington’s tariffs on Beijing. It is understood that no meetings between Mr Albanese and Mr Trump or Mr Xi have been formally locked in, with Mr Albanese having met with both leaders in recent times.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122457

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23775946 (270927ZOCT25) Notable: Video: Albanese raises jet flare incident with Chinese premier ‘very directly’ – Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said he confronted Chinese Premier Li Qiang “very directly” over a Chinese military jet’s deployment of flares near an Australian P-8A Poseidon aircraft on October 19. Speaking in Kuala Lumpur, Albanese called it “an incident of concern” and said, “friends are able to discuss issues frankly.” The meeting followed his Washington visit and a $13 billion rare earths deal with US President Donald Trump. Li said China-Australia ties were “seeing an upward momentum.” Albanese also met Japan’s new Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi to reaffirm support for the Quad and a “free and open Indo-Pacific.”

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122448

>>122456

>>122405

>>122428

Albanese raises jet flare incident with Chinese premier ‘very directly’

Zach Hope and Lisa Visentin - October 27, 2025

1/2

Kuala Lumpur/Singapore: Prime Minister Anthony Albanese raised Australia’s concerns about the close encounter between a Chinese army aircraft and an Australian air force jet “very directly” with Chinese Premier Li Qiang during a bilateral meeting on the sidelines of the ASEAN summit.

Speaking at the summit in Malaysia on Monday after becoming one of the first world leaders to meet with new Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi, Albanese also played down long-running concerns about the future of the security dialogue aimed at countering China’s influence in the Pacific. He suggested a leadership meeting could be held early next year.

Albanese’s meeting with Li comes after a successful visit to Washington last week, where he signed a $13 billion rare earths mining and processing deal with US President Donald Trump aimed at weakening China’s stranglehold on the critical sector.

Hours before Albanese’s White House meeting, the Australian government accused Beijing of engaging in “unsafe and unprofessional” conduct after a Chinese aircraft deployed flares close to an Australian P-8A Poseidon maritime patrol aircraft on October 19 over the South China Sea – the latest in a series of similar incidents between the two countries.

“He heard the message very directly,” Albanese told reporters in Kuala Lumpur on Monday when asked how Li responded.

“I’m not here to report in on what people say when I have meetings. I’m accountable for what I say. And I made the position directly clear that this was an incident of concern for Australia.

“We have disagreements, and friends are able to discuss issues frankly. I did that. I did that directly.”

Albanese would not be drawn on whether he discussed with Li the details of the rare earths deal struck with Trump, but said the pair had talked about “the relationship with the US” and the “success of my visit” to Washington.

Despite the flare-ups over military encounters and Australia’s concerted efforts to counter China’s influence among Pacific nations, the Albanese government has sought to stabilise diplomatic relations and restore trade ties with Beijing. That has meant taking a lower-volume approach to criticism of Beijing than in the Morrison government era.

In remarks before the pair’s closed-door meeting, Li said the China-Australia relationship had deepened following Albanese’s meeting with Chinese President Xi Jinping in July in Beijing.

“Indeed, we are seeing an upward momentum in our relationship, and we welcome it, and we are happy to see it,” Li said.

Albanese, in turn, said he welcomed the tempo of the relationship, adding “whenever there are differences, we navigate those wisely”.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122458

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23780188 (280831ZOCT25) Notable: Video: Fearing a flare-up, Anthony Albanese shoots from the lip about his mate, Xi Jinping – Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said his trust in Chinese President Xi Jinping “has not been shaken” after a Chinese jet fired a flare near an Australian patrol plane, calling Premier Li Qiang “my friend” while insisting “friends are able to discuss issues frankly.” In Kuala Lumpur, Albanese urged Asian leaders “not to succumb to fatalism” and to share responsibility for regional stability. He said Xi “has never given [him] a reason not to trust him.” Albanese reaffirmed hopes for a Quad meeting early next year and welcomed the upcoming Trump–Xi summit, describing his US critical minerals deal as “a really good outcome.”

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122448

>>122456

>>122457

Fearing a flare-up, Anthony Albanese shoots from the lip about his mate, Xi Jinping

SARAH ISON - 27 October 2025

1/2

Anthony Albanese will implore Asian leaders not to “succumb to fatalism” and warn that all nations in ASEAN must be responsible for ensuring stability in the region, as Xi Jinping and Donald Trump ­prepare for their much-awaited showdown this week.

The Prime Minister on Monday said his trust in the Chinese leader had not been shaken by ­Beijing firing a flare dangerously close to an Australian patrol plane last week, and instead expressing confidence in Mr Xi while calling his top lieutenant “a friend”.

With the world waiting for Mr Xi and Mr Trump’s meeting in the second half of a week of ASEAN and APEC summits, there are no expectations that Mr Albanese will cross paths with the two world leaders as he has already met with them both this year.

Southeast Asian business leaders at the ASEAN summit in ­Malaysia have warned leaders that the region is “vulnerable to being pulled into the stormy seas of ­renewed great power rivalry”, and a “Cold War 2.0” could be on the horizon.

Amid hopes that Mr Trump and Mr Xi will strike a deal and de-escalate the trade war that has raged between China and the US this year, Mr Albanese will on Tuesday tell fellow leaders that the region’s prosperity and security depend on “shared responsibility”.

“We cannot succumb to the fatalism that assumes our future is pre-determined. None of us are mere spectators,” he will tell the fifth annual ASEAN-Australia Summit. “We are participants, we are responsible, together we will shape our future. We must work together to choose and build the security and prosperity we want for our citizens. In this, we all have a part to play.”

Mr Albanese has also flagged the possibility of a Quad meeting early next year, after delays caused by the deteriorating relationship between the US President and Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi. In his seventh meeting with Chinese Premier Li Qiang since taking office, Mr Albanese confirmed he had raised the incident between the two countries’ aircraft in the South China Sea while on the sidelines of the ASEAN summit in Kuala Lumpur.

“He heard the message very ­directly,” Mr Albanese said.

“I’m not here to report on what people say when I have meetings. I’m accountable for what I say. And I made the position directly clear that this was an incident of concern for Australia.”

Despite refusing to be drawn on whether he considered Mr Xi a friend when he last met the ­Chinese leader in July, Mr Albanese was much more forthcoming with Mr Li, who he immediately called “my friend” in his greeting to the Premier during public ­remarks on Monday.

Pushed on how he could consider Mr Li a friend following last week’s firing of the flare near an Australian aircraft – the second such incident in less than a year – Mr Albanese defended the move. “We have disagreements and friends are able to discuss issues frankly. I did that,” he said.

“That’s what we’re able to do. It’s important that we engage and that we engage diplomatically, that we make clear our position, which I did directly, which we did when the incident occurred.”

Despite ministers having described the incident as “dangerous and unprofessional”, Mr Albanese said the matter had not impacted his relationship with Mr Xi, who he maintained had never given the Labor leader a reason not to trust him.

“I’ve said very clearly in that context, very clearly and explicitly … that anything that President Xi has said to me has occurred. And that is just a fact,” he said.

“That’s how you deal with these things. This is engagement internationally. I engage very directly. I’m a straight guy.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122459

File: b91af8bee6bbd7d⋯.jpg (1.81 MB,5000x3458,2500:1729,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 2660d5d45627a46⋯.jpg (526.91 KB,3000x2001,1000:667,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23780195 (280844ZOCT25) Notable: Meta, TikTok and Snap say they oppose Australia's youth social media ban but will comply with it – Meta, TikTok and Snap told parliament they will follow Australia’s new ban on users under 16, despite believing it will not protect young people. The law, taking effect December 10, requires platforms to block under-16 users or face fines of up to A$49.5 million. Meta’s Mia Garlick said 450,000 underage accounts would be contacted to delete or store their data, while TikTok and Snap said they would deactivate accounts flagged by behavioural tracking. “We don’t agree, but we accept and will abide by the law,” Snap executive Jennifer Stout said. TikTok’s Ella Woods-Joyce added, “We are on track to meet our compliance.”

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122249

>>122303

>>122304

>>122375

>>122402

Meta, TikTok and Snap say they oppose Australia's youth social media ban but will comply with it

Byron Kaye - October 28, 2025

SYDNEY, Oct 28 (Reuters) - Instagram owner Meta and other social media firms said on Tuesday they will comply with a ban on users under the age of 16, adding that they will start deactivating accounts once the law takes effect on December 10.

In parliament, Meta, TikTok owner ByteDance and Snapchat owner Snap said they continued to believe the ban would not protect young people, but they would soon reach out to owners of more than a million underage accounts to prepare them for the change.

Their comments represented a shift in the social media industry's response to the law, which is being watched by lawmakers around the world as concern grows about youth mental health. Under the Australian law, platforms must take "reasonable steps" to block users aged less than 16 or face a fine of up to A$49.5 million ($32.5 million).

The platforms previously argued that the ban would drive young people to more dangerous corners of the internet that are poorly monitored, as well as deprive young people of social contact. They also said that implementation would be unnecessarily complex. Snap and Google-owned YouTube have also argued they aren't social media companies.

"We don't agree, but we accept and we will abide by the law," said Jennifer Stout, Snap's senior vice president of global policy and platform operations, via a video link.

Ella Woods-Joyce, TikTok's public policy lead for Australia, reiterated the Chinese-owned platform's opposition to the ban but said "TikTok will comply with the law and meet its obligations".

"We are on track to meet our compliance," she said.

Mia Garlick, Meta's policy director for Australia and New Zealand, said the company would soon approach holders of accounts confirmed to be under 16 - about 450,000 across Instagram and Facebook - to give them a choice between deleting their photos and other data or offering to store it until they turned 16.

TikTok, which says it has 200,000 under-16 accounts in Australia, and Snap, which says it has 440,000 under-16 accounts, said they would take similar steps. The companies added that they would use automated behaviour-tracking software to determine if an account holder claiming to be over 16 was underage.

"Where we identify someone that is saying they're 25 but the behaviors would indicate that they're below the age of 16, from December 10th we will have those accounts deactivated," Woods-Joyce said.

For users incorrectly deemed to be under 16, Meta and TikTok said they would refer them to a third-party age-estimation tool. Snap said it was still working on a solution for users who believed they were incorrectly blocked.

https://www.reuters.com/business/media-telecom/meta-tiktok-snap-say-they-oppose-australias-youth-social-media-ban-will-comply-2025-10-28/

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122460

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23780205 (280908ZOCT25) Notable: Video: Virginia Roberts Giuffre's brothers say Jeffrey Epstein's cameras captured crimes, demand they be released – Virginia Giuffre’s brothers have called for US authorities to release evidence she said was held by the FBI, including alleged video tapes showing powerful men committing crimes inside Jeffrey Epstein’s properties. Her brother Sky Roberts told 7.30 the US Department of Justice “holds the key to this entire investigation” and that his sister had turned over “numerous documents” still unreleased. In her memoir Nobody’s Girl, Giuffre described years of sexual abuse, including by Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell, and alleged she was forced to have sex with a “well-known prime minister”. Her older brother Danny Wilson said she told him years ago, “I’m saving the best for last.” Giuffre’s friend Dini von Mueffling said hidden cameras were “very well known” to exist in Epstein’s homes and urged the release of any seized footage. Sky called her book a “predator’s playbook”, showing both the manipulation and “the goofiness, the quirkiness” of his sister, adding, “I think she refused to stay silent.”

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122204

>>122391

>>122392

>>122400

>>122446

Virginia Roberts Giuffre's brothers say Jeffrey Epstein's cameras captured crimes, demand they be released

Alysia Thomas-Sam and Thea Dikeos - Mon 27 October 2025

1/3

Warning: This story details allegations of sexual abuse and suicide.

Among the explosive claims made in Virginia Roberts Giuffre's book Nobody's Girl was that she was raped by her father in the family home from the age of seven.

It is a claim her father Sky William Roberts has strenuously denied.

He had sent a letter to the book's ghostwriter, which read in part: "Just to straighten this out, I never abused my daughter."

"If I had known about that, I would have been very angry and taken care of the situation."

Her older brother Danny Wilson said she told the family the allegations a number of years before her posthumous memoir was released.

"I've known for a long time," Mr Wilson told 7.30.

"I confronted him. That's the man that raised me since I was a year old.

"I asked her years ago, I said, 'You're going after all these important billionaires,' and I said, 'What about him?'

"And she said, 'It's OK. I'm saving the best for last.' And here it is this many years later."

In April, at the age of 41, Roberts Giuffre took her own life at her farm near Perth, Western Australia.

She alleges that life was marred by abuse — first at the hands of her father — then by paedophile and wealthy financier Jeffrey Epstein and allegedly a cadre of his friends and associates.

Roberts Giuffre had waged a public campaign against Epstein and convicted sex trafficker Ghislaine Maxwell.

Could accused PM be revealed?

At the time of her death, Roberts Giuffre had been working on her memoir for four years with author Amy Wallace.

In the book, she recounts the two years she spent as a "sex slave" working for Epstein and Maxwell, who trafficked her to rich and powerful people who "habitually used and humiliated her".

She also wrote that she was forced to have sex with a "well-known prime minister" who she alleged beat her so badly that she begged for her life.

She did not reveal the man's nationality nor any other details about his identity.

Her long-time publicist and friend Dini von Mueffling told 7.30 she believed the name of this former prime minister and the others in Epstein's network would eventually be revealed.

"I think that there's currently a fight to have some of her depositions unsealed, and it's looking like a positive direction," Ms von Mueffling said.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122461

File: 2bb98b5132db03d⋯.jpg (397.99 KB,1920x1080,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 6d84782cca079ff⋯.jpg (156.71 KB,1920x1080,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 7dbe859230cd730⋯.jpg (194.47 KB,1920x1080,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23780215 (280933ZOCT25) Notable: Survivors of paedophile teacher Peter Farmer sue Victorian Education Department – Six survivors of paedophile teacher Peter Farmer are suing the Victorian Education Department, alleging it failed to protect them and allowed him to keep teaching — and offending — in the Northern Territory after complaints surfaced in the 1980s. Farmer, who groomed and assaulted students at a Newborough primary school, was jailed for six and a half years after pleading guilty to 10 charges. Judge Geoffrey Chettle described his conduct as “extensive, repetitive and repulsive”. Former students Lola* and Jo* told the ABC he was “an absolute mastermind”, normalising abuse in the classroom while calling victims his “wives”. Witness Dianne Smith said she reported seeing Farmer molest a girl in 1988, but he was allowed to resign and later taught elsewhere. Lawyer Grace Wilson said the department’s inaction allowed Farmer to continue abusing children, calling its response “a failure of duty of care”. The department has denied responsibility but issued an apology to victims.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Survivors of paedophile teacher Peter Farmer sue Victorian Education Department

Bec Symons - 28 October 2025

1/3

Warning: This story contains descriptions of child sexual abuse.

Growing up in the Latrobe Valley in the 1990s, the name Peter Farmer was notorious.

People knew of the teacher who had abused children at Newborough, but nobody knew just how bad the abuse was.

Thirty years later, a proper police investigation spanning three years would reveal what victims think is just the tip of the iceberg.

While Farmer serves his sentence in prison, six of his victims are suing the Victorian Education Department for failing to protect them and for what they allege was its inaction, which led to him teaching and offending further in the Northern Territory.

Lola* was sexually abused every day at school for two years.

Farmer had many methods of disguising his abuse.

But largely, it was brazen and in plain sight.

He would plaster the children's artwork over the classroom windows to shield them from view of the staffroom.

"We all believed, and I certainly believed that I was involved in a relationship with him and that it was actually quite normal, and that is how my life was going to be," Lola said.

"He managed to make us all think that we were all special."

On a few occasions, Farmer lured Lola to his home, telling her parents he was hosting a class barbecue.

But she was the only one there.

When her parents would arrive to pick her up, he would say the other children had already left.

She remembers the day they found out about the abuse.

Her dad cried. She cried.

A couple of days later, the devout Christian, who usually would not hurt a fly, knocked on Farmer's door and punched him.

A week or so later, he paid Farmer another visit, found him attempting suicide and saved his life.

"We've never forgotten about it," Lola said.

In a drawer, she still has a picture of Farmer's border collie.

It is kept alongside her school reports, showing his overwhelming praise and a class photo.

Lola has never been able to trust her partners or keep careers on track and has been in rehabilitation several times for substance abuse.

"To me, it feels like my life has been a failure. I've been on antidepressants for 30 years, sleeping tablets for 25 years," Lola said.

"Some mornings I can't get out of bed. I just have to keep the blinds shut, and Mum and Dad will come around and bring me soup."

'An absolute mastermind'

Jo* vividly remembers Farmer rearranging classroom furniture to create spaces to carry out his abuse.

She cannot stand to hear John Farnham's song You're the Voice, because he used that and other hits to keep his students entertained, while paying attention to his selected few.

He referred to his chosen victims as his "wives".

Jo told the ABC she believed he got away with the abuse for so long because he had brainwashed the children to think his behaviour was normal.

"He was an absolute mastermind," she said.

"In the classroom, this abuse was normalised, it was never forced … it was a treat.

"But it just never felt right."

He would sit on the heater, call girls over and touch them.

On one occasion, he made a girl bleed.

When another child asked what was on his hands, he told them it was "love juice".

Jo says she was not one of Farmer's chosen "wives" who received adoration.

But she was both sexually and physically abused. When she tried to stick up for her friends, she was beaten.

"He strangled me, hit me with a chair, he punched me," Jo said.

At lunchtime one day, he was manning the sports equipment.

He told her to touch his penis, or she would not be able to borrow any equipment.

When Jo dug out her school photo for the police investigation, she was shocked to find she had cut Farmer from the photo.

She has no memory of doing it.

But she will never forget telling a teacher she was scared Farmer was hurting her friends, and the feeling of not being believed.

"As you move into [being] an adult, you recognise that we were manipulated, that we were groomed and that we were silenced," she said.

After Farmer was found out, he followed both girls back to their homes on separate occasions, in a successful bid to silence them.

"He followed me home from school and said if I ever told anyone, he would kill me and my family," Jo said.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122462

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23780242 (281002ZOCT25) Notable: Video: On the dark web, paedophiles are sharing tips on how to abuse children in child care – A Four Corners investigation has found encrypted forums on the dark web where offenders exchange information about infiltrating childcare centres and evading detection. Professor Michael Salter of UNSW said the offenders’ own posts showed that “early child care [is] a conducive place for the abuse of children”. The forums contain so-called “handbooks” outlining grooming tactics and methods for gaining employment in child care. Some users also boasted of access to children, prompting calls for stronger regulation. The investigation links these forums to convicted offenders including former childcare worker Ashley Griffith, sentenced to life imprisonment for assaulting children in Australia and Italy. Former AFP agent Drew Viney said Griffith’s case was “one of the worst” he had seen, describing how forensic work led police to multiple centres. Experts warned that inadequate supervision made childcare facilities attractive to offenders, with Dr Mike Bourke urging vigilance and communication among parents and staff.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109236 (pb)

>>109238 (pb)

>>109255 (pb)

On the dark web, paedophiles are sharing tips on how to abuse children in child care

Adele Ferguson - 28 October 2025

1/3

Paedophiles are using the dark web to share information about how to gain access to childcare centres to sexually abuse babies and toddlers while avoiding getting caught.

Warning: This story contains discussion of child sexual abuse.

A Four Corners investigation has uncovered private forums where predators coach each other and post proof of their abuse. The forums give an insight into how organised and strategic these predators have become.

Inside these encrypted forums, predators swap tactics and advice. One of the most chilling questions posted is, "Where do I find a child?"

The answers are laid out in detailed paedophile handbooks — guides that cover everything from online security and grooming techniques to how to pass a job interview and build trust once inside a centre.

Every day on average, at least three cases of sexual and physical misconduct are reported in Australian childcare centres.

Michael Salter, a professor of criminology at the University of New South Wales, said many cases of sexual abuse in child care only came to light when offenders uploaded evidence of their crimes online, not because centres detected or reported the abuse.

"The offenders are giving us the picture … The offenders are choosing early child care as a conducive place for the abuse of children.

"They are telling us that we have a massive problem."

Professor Salter said the sharing of this disturbing material had been facilitated by the so-called dark web, enabled by anonymising browser software such as Tor, and encrypted messaging services such as Telegram, Signal and WhatsApp.

"We've created spaces beyond the reach of the law where child sex offenders can congregate in their millions," Professor Salter said.

"There's about 45,000 child sexual abuse websites just on the Tor platform alone.

"It's estimated that the population of child sex offenders on the dark web numbers in its millions — and this is a place where they are sharing child abuse content, but they're also creating and normalising cultures of sex offending."

Professor Salter advises the Canadian Centre for Child Protection, the creator of Arachnid — a system that hunts child abuse material across the web, including the dark web.

"One statement from an offender on the dark web that really stood out for me was he said, 'Babies are meat, babies are meat and you can't tell me anything different,'" Professor Salter said.

Four Corners asked Arachnid analysts to scrape dark web forums on child care to see how offenders talk and plan.

Most of the material is too explicit to show, but the discussions reveal how organised and deviant they really are.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122463

File: d9263b2c6a2eccf⋯.jpg (165.41 KB,1638x922,819:461,Clipboard.jpg)

File: e422b54e036a0ff⋯.jpg (231.04 KB,2047x1152,2047:1152,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23784970 (290826ZOCT25) Notable: Australia, Asian mates take veiled swipe at Beijing as PM prepares to dine with Trump – Australia and eleven Southeast Asian nations warned that “intensifying geo-strategic shifts” were “heightening the risk of conflict,” in a statement seen as a rebuke to Beijing after Chinese military provocations. The ASEAN–Australia declaration called for restraint, “freedom of navigation,” and adherence to international law. Anthony Albanese said it reflected a “shared commitment to upholding a peaceful and stable Southeast Asia.” Malaysian Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim said engagement with China “doesn’t mean condoning excesses.” Albanese now heads to APEC in South Korea, where Donald Trump and Xi Jinping will discuss trade and rare earths. Chinese Premier Li Qiang accused the US of “economic bullying.” Albanese reaffirmed support for the Philippines and Japan.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122448

>>122448

>>122456

>>122457

>>122458

Australia, Asian mates take veiled swipe at Beijing as PM prepares to dine with Trump

SARAH ISON - 29 October 2025

1/2

Australia and nearly a dozen Southeast Asian countries have raised concern over the “intensifying geo-strategic shifts” that they warn are “heightening the risk of conflict”, in a major joint statement that made a veiled swipe at Beijing and its increasing assertiveness across the region.

In a move that followed China targeting an Australian surveillance aircraft with flares last week and ramming a Filipino fishing vessel earlier this month, the ASEAN-Australia summit on Tuesday saw the release of a statement on “conflict prevention and crisis management”.

The release of the statement came a day before Anthony Albanese and Donald Trump were due to attend a dinner in South Korea on Wednesday night, after having met for the first time face-to-face last week.

After meeting with the Japanese Prime Minister and ahead of a much-anticipated one-on-one with Chinese President Xi Jinping, the White House confirmed Mr Trump would be attending the same dinner Mr Albanese has flagged he would be present for.

While the two leaders were confirmed to be attending the same event, there were no formal plans for them to meet, following their lengthy discussions last week.

Speaking ahead of his flight to South Korea, where this year’s APEC summit will take place, Mr Albanese said he hoped the meeting between Mr Trump and Mr Xi on Thursday would see “a successful outcome”.

The looming meeting between Mr Trump and Mr Xi follows the release of the statement from Australia and Southeast Asian countries on Tuesday night which acknowledged the “shared commitment to diplomacy, maintaining and promoting peace, security and stability in the region”.

“ … as well as to the peaceful resolution of disputes, including full respect for legal and diplomatic processes, without resorting to the threat or use of force, in accordance with international law and reaffirming the need for reliable and open channels of communication to reduce risks of misunderstanding and miscalculation and prevent conflict in our region,” the statement, co-signed by countries including the Philippines, Indonesia, Malaysia, Singapore, Vietnam and Laos said.

“(We are) concerned by the increase in conflicts in recent years and the respective dire consequences, including on the health and safety of civilians and humanitarian personnel, civilian infrastructure, economic prosperity and energy and food security.

“(We acknowledge) growing concerns that intensifying geo-strategic shifts are heightening the risk of conflict, reiterating calls for peace and stability in the region, emphasising ASEAN’s role in shaping and leading the evolving regional architecture that is built upon ASEAN-led mechanisms, and in ensuring that geopolitical and geo-strategic shifts will not disrupt peace, security, stability and prosperity for peoples in the Indo-Pacific.”

In the clearest indication that the statement was made in response to Beijing’s latest actions in the South China Sea, the four-page document stressed the importance of “freedom of navigation and overflight, unimpeded lawful maritime commerce and other internationally lawful uses of the sea in the region”.

“(We emphasise) the importance of non-militarisation and the need to enhance mutual trust and confidence, exercise self-restraint in the conduct of activities and avoid actions that may raise the risk of accidents, misunderstanding, and miscalculation and may complicate the situation,” the statement said.

In his address to the ASEAN-Australia summit, Mr Albanese said the statement demonstrated the group’s “shared commitment to upholding a peaceful and stable Southeast Asia”, which included a “guarding against conflict and other potential threats to the rules and norms that advance all of our interests”.

“As ASEAN partners, maintaining open and constructive dialogue is always valuable. The statement highlights ASEAN’s pivotal role in deepening mutual trust between member nations, to reduce the risk of misunderstanding, navigate differences and prevent escalation,“ he said.

Australia-Malaysia relationship in ‘very good shape’

Following the summit, Mr Albanese met with Malaysian Prime Minister Anwar bin Ibrahim, declaring the relationship between the two countries was “in very good shape”.

“We both are committed to the international rule of law. We’re both committed to the norms of engagement, respectfully and dialogue and peace and security in our region,” he said.

To illustrate his commitment to the ASEAN summit, Mr Albanese pointed out that up until now, he had never missed a full week of parliament in his 30 year political career.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122464

File: b172088d0044648⋯.jpg (178.61 KB,2047x1152,2047:1152,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23784984 (290840ZOCT25) Notable: Online ‘hunters’ targeting girls, says AFP commissioner Krissy Barrett – Australian Federal Police Commissioner Krissy Barrett has warned that boys and young men are “hunting, stalking and grooming teenagers online” and coercing them to commit acts of violence against themselves and others. In her first major address, Ms Barrett said “crimefluencers” glorifying sadism, nihilism and Satanism were forming decentralised online networks to target pre-teen and teenage girls. She revealed the AFP had identified 59 alleged offenders linked to these groups, with several international arrests made. A new AFP taskforce, Pompilid, will “identify, disrupt and dismantle” criminal ecosystems exploiting children. Ms Barrett said perpetrators sought notoriety, not money or sexual gratification. She also unveiled work with Microsoft on an AI tool to interpret emoji and slang in encrypted chats, as the AFP expands child exploitation and terrorism investigations.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109480 (pb)

>>122351

Online ‘hunters’ targeting girls, says AFP commissioner Krissy Barrett

GEOFF CHAMBERS - 28 October 2025

1/2

Australia’s top cop Krissy Barrett will issue a disturbing warning to parents of vulnerable girls that young men and boys are hunting, stalking and grooming teenagers online and forcing them “to perform serious acts of violence on themselves, their siblings, others or their pets”.

In her first speech as Australian Federal Police commissioner, Ms Barrett will ramp up the AFP’s fight against online child sex abuse, sadistic exploitation, radicalisation, and “crimefluencers” targeting pre-teen and teenage girls.

Ms Barrett will use her National Press Club address on Wednesday to paint a grim ­picture of the exploding number of threats confronting teenagers, parents, teachers and community leaders.

The 25-year federal policing veteran will also reveal that the AFP, a world-leading authority in identifying victims of child sexual abuse, this year supported Malaysian police in targeting an international network of pedophiles, including one individual accused of “the most heinous of crimes – buying infants of Malaysian and Indonesian descent for sexual exploitation”.

As part of the ongoing investigation, 20 children were rescued, two children were believed to be deceased after alleged extended abuse and two children remained unaccounted for.

Ms Barrett, who replaced Reece Kershaw as AFP commissioner on October 4, will declare her top target is the mastermind of a number of tobacco-related arsons linked to the “alleged politically motivated attack on the Adass Israel synagogue”.

“That person is a national security threat to this country,” Ms Barrett will say. “Of all the alleged criminals accused of threatening Australia – he is my No 1 priority, and I have tasked my most experienced criminal hunters to target him.”

In a wide-ranging speech, Ms Barrett will reveal that 48 youths aged from 12 to 17 have been ­investigated by Joint ­Counter Terrorism teams in the past five years, including 10 since January.

As police chiefs combat human trafficking, hate crimes, youth radicalisation, child abuse, cyber crime, sextortion and foreign interference, Ms Barrett will disclose specific examples of the nefarious online targeting of young Australians. Acknowledging the “confronting” nature of her warnings to parents, Ms Barrett will highlight “a worrying threat that we are still learning about in Australia”.

“There are decentralised online crime networks and loosely affiliated individuals in Australia and offshore who are glorifying crime online, such as sadistic online exploitation, cyber attacks and violence,” she will say.

“These crimes are now spilling into the real world and have real-world consequences.

“While these networks do not have a centralised hierarchy or a single ideology, they are prolific and are attracted to violent ­extremism, nihilism, sadism, ­Nazism and Satanism. They are crimefluencers, and are ­motivated by anarchy and hurting others, with most of their victims pre-teen or teenage girls.”

Ms Barrett will say perpetrators are “overwhelmingly young boys and young men from ­Western English-speaking backgrounds” seeking to intimidate, exploit and control young girls.

“Typically, these young girls have low self-esteem, mental health disorders, history of self-harm, eating disorders or other attributes that may lead them to seek connection online,” she will say. “This can make them more vulnerable to being targeted directly by these networks. The motivation of individuals within these networks is not financial nor is it for sexual gratification – this is purely for their amusement, for fun, or to be popular online without fully understanding the consequences.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122465

File: fbaa05b61b936c6⋯.jpg (59.29 KB,1266x697,1266:697,Clipboard.jpg)

File: b12a0044ae3035c⋯.jpg (956.39 KB,5000x3333,5000:3333,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 27cb52b1bb592e0⋯.jpg (244.31 KB,1411x886,1411:886,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23784992 (290846ZOCT25) Notable: Video: Dozens arrested in Operation Ironside sting across South Australia – Police have arrested 55 people and laid more than 800 charges in a new phase of Operation Ironside, targeting organised crime linked to the encrypted AN0M app. Deputy Police Commissioner Linda Williams called the coordinated raids “a significant blow” to criminal syndicates, with $25.8m in assets seized across 23 properties. Those arrested face drug trafficking, manufacturing, and money-laundering charges. Authorities allege the offenders include a Comanchero gang member and associates of other groups. Nearly 2.5m intercepted AN0M messages informed the operation, which followed a High Court ruling upholding the app’s use in prosecutions. Since 2021, 164 people have been arrested in South Australia under Ironside, with further arrests expected. “We will create a hostile environment for you to operate in,” Williams said.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122353

Dozens arrested in Operation Ironside sting across South Australia

Jordanna Schriever - 29 October 2025

Dozens of people have been arrested and charged with more than 800 offences in a major Operation Ironside sting across South Australia linked to the encrypted AN0M app.

Deputy Police Commissioner Linda Williams said 55 people were arrested today, taking the total number of people arrested as part of the operation since 2021 to 164.

"This is a significant blow to organised crime across South Australia," she said.

"I don't recall this number being arrested in a single day in the entire time I've been in SAPOL, so I think it is unprecedented in my history."

She said nearly 300 police officers were involved in raids at 23 properties that began before dawn, resulting in $25.8 million in assets being seized by police.

Six of those arrested were already in custody.

The latest arrests are the third batch connected to intelligence gathered from the encrypted AN0M app, using a capability developed by the Australian Federal Police. The app began being circulated among criminal syndicates in 2018.

Deputy Commissioner Williams said detectives had reviewed in excess of 2.5 million AN0M messages which were sent from devices while the platform was live.

It was disabled at the time of the first phase of arrests in June 2021.

The deputy commissioner alleged those arrested in the latest sting included a "fully fledged" member of the Comanchero bikie gang, and said associates of "various gangs" had also been arrested.

She said the latest phase of the sting also involved the seizure of 70 vehicles valued at $2.5 million, including two Harley Davidson motorcycles.

"Credit balances in bank accounts have been restrained, totalling about $588,000," she said.

The deputy commissioner said cash, small amounts of cannabis, cocaine and steroids were also seized.

She said those arrested are facing a raft of charges including drug trafficking, drug manufacturing and money laundering offences.

"This is a really strong deterrent message to organised criminals operating in South Australia," she said.

"We will create a hostile environment for you to operate in and we will continue to do so."

She said detectives had worked "tirelessly" over the past two years ahead of the latest arrests.

"We have been able to leverage the intelligence from the encrypted AN0M app to bring this to a successful resolution," she said.

Deputy Commissioner Williams said a High Court ruling, handed down earlier this month, confirmed the use of the encrypted app in prosecutions and "paved the way for us to go to resolution today".

"This was a complex multi-faceted resolution that had to be planned and has taken some time, coordination, bringing together of resources," she said.

She said the passage through court of those arrested today should be "much more efficient" than the arrests made in 2021, some of whom were yet to face trial.

The deputy commissioner said further arrests were likely with "ongoing investigations into further suspects".

"I think you can anticipate more arrests but probably not at the [tempo] that you have seen today," she said.

She said police were on alert "other networks" may seek to use the arrests to their advantage.

Some of those arrested had already been charged during the first Operation Ironside sting in June 2021.

They began appearing in court today about lunch time, with more expected to appear this afternoon.

History of Ironside arrests

On June 7, 2021, a three-year sting resulted in the simultaneous arrests of hundreds of alleged criminals across 18 countries.

Among them were 40 in South Australia — an arrest number that, according to officers at the time, was the largest for organised crime in a single day in the state's history.

Prior to that sting — which police said involved 460 officers searching 80 premises — another 33 Operation Ironside arrests had already occurred.

At the time, the AFP said the three-year operation had led to 525 charges against 224 offenders across Australia.

Police said the encrypted AN0M app had been used internationally by more than 11,000 members of organised crime groups.

Authorities were able to read messages in real time using a complicated system that copied them as they were sent, and re-transmitted them to a server in Sydney which police could access.

About 28 million messages were captured by the app, including about 19 million relating to Australia.

The latest arrests follow a ruling handed down by the High Court earlier this month, which backed new laws that support the use of the AN0M app in prosecutions — paving the way for criminal prosecutions to proceed and leading to a flurry of guilty pleas.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-10-29/dozens-arrested-operation-ironside-anom-sting-adelaide/105946240

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122466

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23788837 (300924ZOCT25) Notable: ‘Blurred lines’ between state actors, organised crime, AFP Commissioner Krissy Barrett warns – (Video) Australian Federal Police Commissioner Krissy Barrett has cautioned that the distinction between “state-sponsored” operations and organised crime is eroding, forcing law enforcement to rethink its counter-interference strategy. Citing recent Mossad claims that an Iranian Quds Force commander directed anti-Semitic attacks in Australia, Barrett said foreign powers were increasingly using underworld figures to mask their activities. She praised the AFP–ASIO task force targeting foreign interference, saying it was “very busy,” though much of its work remained classified. Barrett also endorsed Labor’s bill to list Iran’s Revolutionary Guard Corps as a terrorist organisation and urged parents to remain vigilant despite the upcoming social-media ban for under-16s. “Radicalisation or exploitation … can happen so quickly,” she warned.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109480 (pb)

>>122351

>>122464

>>122454

‘Blurred lines’ between state actors, organised crime, AFP Commissioner Krissy Barrett warns

JACK QUAIL - October 29, 2025

Australian Federal Police Commissioner Krissy Barrett has warned of a growing “blurring of lines” between state actors and local organised crime networks, prompting the agency to rethink its approach to foreign interference.

Delivering her inaugural ­address to the National Press Club on Wednesday, Commissioner Barrett’s remarks came after Israeli spy agency Mossad alleged that a senior Iranian ­official had orchestrated a series of anti-Semitic attacks across the world, including in Australia.

Mossad on Monday identified Sardar Ammar, a senior commander in the Quds Force – the covert arm of Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps – as being responsible for fuelling “terror without an Iranian footprint” by recruiting foreigners to carry out attacks abroad.

That included the firebombing of Melbourne’s Adass Israel Synagogue in late 2024, among other anti-Semitic attacks, which Anthony Albanese revealed in August had been ­directed by Iran but carried out by third parties.

Commissioner Barrett would not be drawn on the specifics of the incident but said it was emblematic of a growing trend, whereby foreign governments were working through underworld figures.

“What we are also seeing in the environment as well is now a blurring of lines … state-sponsored, state actors and state sponsored activity, blurring across organised crime networks in this country,” she said.

“[That] is causing us to really have another look at how do we combat such a complex blurring of criminal lines.”

Labor this week introduced new legislation to the federal parliament that will enable it to list the IRGC as a terrorist ­organisation.

Commissioner Barrett praised the success of the AFP’s counter foreign interference task force, which is co-led with ASIO, but was prevented from discussing its work given the sensitive nature of such matters.

“To give you assurance that there is a lot of exceptional work that goes on, that unfortunately, you don’t hear a lot about, because the very nature of the work is often … But certainly, the task force is very busy,” she said.

Previously serving as the agency’s deputy commissioner overseeing national security, Commissioner Barrett was sworn in as the nation’s top cop earlier this month and became the first woman to be appointed to the role.

During her address, she also cautioned that Labor’s impending social media ban for those aged under 16, slated to take ­effect on December 10, would not entirely prevent children from accessing such websites.

“The age verification and the age standards is a great initiative, but it’s not going to solve the problem on its own,” she said, encouraging parents to have discussions with their children so that they were comfortable reporting unsafe incidents online.

“That’s a really, really important message that kids still know that they can come forward and they can discuss with a safe adult what might be happening to them on social media or online so that we can obviously take ­action,” she said.

Asked if the ban should extend to other social media sites, Commissioner Barrett wouldn’t single out individual platforms, and instead reiterated that it was vital parents understood what their children were accessing.

“The rapidness of the radicalisation or the exploitation, it can just happen so quickly,” she said.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/blurred-lines-between-state-actors-organised-crime-afp-commissioner-krissy-barrett-warns/news-story/ee812059ae1293287da0c02ee6aaf03c

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m_D5KVqE8go

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122467

File: 14b7e2287d418dc⋯.mp4 (15.04 MB,960x540,16:9,Clipboard.mp4)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23788843 (300934ZOCT25) Notable: Video: Iranian state media Press TV hit with foreign influence notice – The Albanese government has branded Iranian broadcaster Press TV a foreign government agent under the Foreign Influence Transparency Scheme, giving it until November 18 to declare its ties to Tehran or face prosecution. Attorney-General Michelle Rowland said non-compliance could lead to criminal penalties. Press TV, sanctioned in 2023 over Iran’s treatment of women, gained attention after interviewing Senator Fatima Payman, who later apologised. Liberal senator Dave Sharma said the action was “two years overdue,” accusing Labor of weak enforcement. Iranian-Australian groups welcomed the move, calling Press TV a “propaganda arm of the regime.” The decision follows ASIO findings linking Iran’s Revolutionary Guard Corps to anti-Semitic attacks in Australia.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109584 (pb)

>>109585 (pb)

>>122206

>>122454

Iranian state media Press TV hit with foreign influence notice

JAMES DOWLING and MOHAMMAD ALFARES - 30 October 2025

1/2

Attorney-General Michelle Rowland has branded an Iranian state-owned media organisation as a foreign government agent months after it broadcast an interview with independent senator Fatima Payman.

The Albanese government last week issued a provisional transparency notice declaring Iranian news organisation Press TV to be a foreign government-related entity, giving the media group until November 18 to declare any ties to the Islamic regime. Ms Rowland on Thursday confirmed failure to do so would risk prosecution.

“The Albanese government expects that individuals or organisations that have obligations under the Foreign Influence Transparency Scheme register their activities,” she said. “Failure to register when required to do so may attract criminal penalties.”

The Foreign Influence Transparency Scheme, established in 2018, places mandatory obligations on foreign governments and their associates to declare their lobbying and political communication activities.

Press TV was sanctioned by the Albanese government in 2023, on the first anniversary of the incarceration of Iranian Mahsa Amini, who was detained for not wearing a hijab properly. Amini died after allegedly being beaten by police.

Press TV drew attention in March when it interviewed Senator Payman during which she said women were treated better in Iran than in the West. She later apologised for taking part in the event.

She told The Australian on Thursday that it was appropriate for the Attorney-General’s ­Department to list Press TV as a foreign government actor.

Despite the sanctions, Press TV continued to broadcast news stories filed by an Australian correspondent, Shahana Butt, until February this year.

Liberal senator Dave Sharma in March wrote to Foreign Affairs Minister Penny Wong demanding a “full investigation and proper enforcement of the sanctions regime as it applies to Press TV” and on Wednesday questioned how the Iranian broadcaster had dodged registration for years.

“The provisional transparency notice issued against Press TV is welcome, but at least two years overdue,” he told The Australian. “It beggars belief that it has taken this long for the Labor government to properly enforce its own sanctions regime against Press TV – a state-run propaganda arm of the Iranian regime.

“Press TV was sanctioned in September 2023, yet for nearly two years it has been allowed to operate freely and openly.

“Australia’s sanctions regime only has credibility if it’s enforced. Allowing sanctioned entities like Press TV to operate on Australian soil unchecked sends the wrong message to both our allies and to hostile foreign powers.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122468

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23788854 (300948ZOCT25) Notable: Video: Critical praise and a presidential pat: Anthony Albanese basks as Donald Trump talks up $13bn deal – Donald Trump publicly praised Anthony Albanese for doing a “fantastic job” on the $13bn critical minerals agreement between the US and Australia, describing their previous meeting as “great.” At a dinner in South Korea ahead of the APEC summit, Mr Trump patted Mr Albanese’s arm and said, “We’re working together on rare earths, but we’re working on a lot of things together.” The US President also announced a deal with South Korea and voiced optimism about talks with Xi Jinping. OECD chief Mathias Cormann called the minerals partnership “very important and positive,” saying it would strengthen supply chains vital to AI, defence, and energy transition.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122412

>>122448

>>122456

>>122457

>>122458

>>122463

Critical praise and a presidential pat: Anthony Albanese basks as Donald Trump talks up $13bn deal

SARAH ISON - 30 October 2025

Donald Trump has praised ­Anthony Albanese for a “fantastic job” done on the $13bn critical minerals and rare earths deal struck between their countries last week, which he described as “a great meeting”.

In a strikingly warm greeting to the Prime Minister at a dinner in South Korea with other world leaders on Wednesday, the US President finished his opening remarks with a direct reference to Mr Albanese. “We had a great meeting a week ago … You’ve done a fantastic job,” he told Mr Albanese, ­patting him on the arm. “We’re working together on rare earths, but we’re working on a lot of things together.”

Seating beside each other at the dinner organised as part of an APEC summit, Mr Trump clinked glasses with Mr Albanese, before thanking South Korean President Lee Jae-myung for his hospitality. Mr Trump also revealed he had struck an agreement with South Korea, while declaring he was ­optimistic that he would land a deal with Chinese President Xi Jinping on Thursday.

The event – attended by leaders of Thailand, Singapore, the US, Australia, Canada, New Zealand and Vietnam – followed Mr Trump’s move to placate Indo-­Pacific countries hit by US tariffs, arguing that when the US thrived “our partners thrive”.

“National security [has been] given to us by the tariffs, properly used tariffs,” he said. “Other countries, as you know, abused them against us, but we never chose to use them very much.”

OECD secretary-general and former Australian finance minister Mathias Cormann – who is also in South Korea for the APEC conference – said recent deals on the supply of critical minerals ­between the US and Australia were “very important and positive developments” to boost supply chain security and resilience.

“These sorts of agreements are fully aligned with OECD recommendations to promote inter­national partnerships, open and transparent trade, and market-based responsible investment to ensure the secure supply of resources.,” Mr Cormann told The Australian.

He said they were essential in terms of the “digital and AI-­driven transformation of our economies, defence and the energy transition.”

The dinner, at the Hilton Hotel in Gyeongju, comes ahead of a highly anticipated meeting between Mr Trump and Mr Xi in the small South Korean town on Thursday.

The US slapped tariffs on China and nations across the world, including Australia, in April, in a move that devastated economies and led to Washington being accused of protectionism.

Despite frustrations from international partners, Mr Trump used a speech in South Korea on Tuesday to defend his sanctions.

“We didn’t use tariffs stupidly,” he said in a 45-minute address during which he declared the US had entered a “golden age” under his presidency.

“And when America thrives our partners thrive and our alliances thrive … the Indo-Pacific thrives. Around the world we’re signing one trade deal after another to balance our relationships on the basis of reciprocity.”

Mr Trump spruiked his role in facilitating a deal between Cambodia and Thailand this week, and claimed the Ukraine War would never have happened if he’d been President.

“The Ukraine war … I thought it would be an easy one because of my relationship with President [Vladimir] Putin, but he turned out to be a little different,” he said.

“It would have never started if I had been President.”

Amid simmering tensions with India that has led to doubts over the future of the Quad, which includes Australia, Mr Trump said he had “great respect” for Prime Minister Narendra Modi. The comments douse hopes the Quad could meet in the near future, after Mr Albanese said he was optimistic the group would meet in the first quarter of next year.

Ahead of attending the dinner with Mr Trump and other world leaders, Mr Albanese visited the UN war memorial cemetery in Busan, touring the grounds with the custodian of the site, ambassador Suh Jeong-in, and the South Korea’s Minister of Patriots and Veterans Affairs, Kwon Oh-eul.

Mr Albanese remarked that many of the 281 Australians laid to rest in the cemeteries were “so young”.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/critical-praise-and-a-presidential-pat-anthony-albanese-basks-as-donald-trump-talks-up-13bn-deal/news-story/ae1cc24da38e4f98ab4e6bc2199f0386

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dcq4wg6vC_s

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122469

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23788869 (300959ZOCT25) Notable: Rare win: Donald Trump and Xi Jinping use superpowers for good – (Video) Donald Trump hailed an “amazing meeting” with Xi Jinping after securing a trade deal to ease US-China tensions, pledging to cut tariffs by 10 per cent in exchange for Beijing delaying rare earth export limits. Xi called for the two nations to be “partners and friends,” with both leaders agreeing to reciprocal visits next year. Mr Trump said “Taiwan never came up” but cited talks on Ukraine and fentanyl. Anthony Albanese welcomed the thaw, calling it “good news” for global stability. Xinhua confirmed a “basic consensus” but gave few details, while Kevin Rudd warned that underlying strategic tensions would persist.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122456

>>122457

>>122458

>>122463

>>122468

Rare win: Donald Trump and Xi Jinping use superpowers for good

WILL GLASGOW - 30 October 2025

1/2

Donald Trump has hailed an “amazing meeting” with Xi Jinping, with the US President claiming he had secured a trade deal that would end Beijing’s chokehold on rare earths in return for a 10 per cent cut on America’s tariff on Chinese goods.

China’s President also struck a positive note, calling for the two superpowers to be “partners and friends” during their 100-minute-long encounter on the sidelines of an APEC meeting in South Korea.

Speaking on Air Force One after the meeting, Mr Trump said “Taiwan never came up”, while noting he spoke at length with Mr Xi about Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. Mr Trump also said Beijing had committed to buying a “tremendous amount” of American soybeans and to “work very hard” on cracking down on fentanyl ingredients.

Anthony Albanese described the cooling of tensions between Washington and Beijing as “good news” and dismissed concerns that the rare earths detente would hurt Australian miners.

After calling his Chinese counterpart “a great leader from a great country”, Mr Trump said he would visit Beijing in April and added that Mr Xi would reciprocate with a trip to America later next year, an indication the two leaders want to maintain their personal relationship despite widespread points of tension in the bilateral relationship.

“On a scale from 0 to 10 with 10 being the best, I would say the meeting was 12,” Mr Trump said on his presidential jet, as he flew back to Washington after an almost week-long trip to Malaysia, Japan and South Korea.

Mr Trump had earlier called Mr Xi a “very tough negotiator” as the world’s two most powerful leaders held their highly anticipated meeting.

Just moments before it began, Mr Trump said in a social media post that he had ordered the Pentagon to start nuclear weapons testing on a level comparable with China and Russia. The move came after Russian President Vladimir Putin said on Wednesday that Moscow had successfully tested a nuclear-capable, nuclear-powered underwater drone, in defiance of Washington’s warnings.

“Because of other countries testing programs, I have instructed the Department of War to start testing our nuclear weapons on an equal basis,” Mr Trump wrote in a Truth Social post that specifically referenced Russia and China.

Mr Trump noted the US had more nuclear weapons than any other country, praising his own efforts to do “a complete update and renovation of existing weapons”. He added that “Russia is second, and China is a distant third, but will be even within five years”.

Later while flying home, Mr Trump said he wanted to work on “denuclearisation” with Moscow and Beijing.

The US President said America and China had “a deal” on trade, before noting some “stumbling blocks” remained.

Mr Trump said Beijing had agreed to delay by a year the implementation of its stringent export limits on rare earths, which had roiled advanced manufacturers and defence companies in America and its allies.

“Hopefully it will be disappeared from our vocabulary for a little while,” Mr Trump said on Air Force One.

Shares in Australia’s most valuable rare earths miner Lynas closed down 3.2 per cent on the news.

A statement released by China’s official news agency Xinhua after the meeting contained few details on the trade framework and failed to confirm most of the specifics mentioned by Mr Trump.

Comments attributed to Mr Xi in the Chinese statement said “follow-up work” needed to take place.

“Both teams should refine and finalise follow-up work as soon as possible, maintain and implement the consensus, and provide tangible results to reassure the economies of China, the US and the world,” Xinhua cited Mr Xi as saying.

Speaking after the meeting, Mr Albanese welcomed the apparently warm meeting between the two superpowers and dismissed worries that the end of the rare earths chokehold would hurt Australian miners.

“We want a good relationship between the international community,” the Prime Minister said at a port in South Korea.

“We are friends of the United States and allies. Our major trading partner is China.

“It is good news if tensions in the global trading environment are reduced, and we welcome the positive meeting between President Trump and President Xi.”

When asked directly if he was concerned the deal would limit Australia’s ability to capitalise on its agreement with the US on critical minerals, the Prime Minister said “not at all”.

“Investment in Australian critical minerals makes sense, making sure that our economies are resilient, making sure that we have investment in the resources that will power the globe in the 21st century,” Mr Albanese said.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122470

File: 092880d21349a97⋯.jpg (532.35 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: f8dc2ec878b8524⋯.jpg (218.55 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: cd83b200c426489⋯.jpg (191.97 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23788879 (301013ZOCT25) Notable: New defence committee to cast ‘unblinking eye’ over AUKUS – Parliament is set to create a powerful new defence committee to oversee the AUKUS submarine program, ADF operations and classified strategy. The Coalition will support the bill after previously blocking it, with Opposition defence spokesman Angus Taylor proposing that membership be limited to MPs who back higher defence spending and AUKUS. Former minister Andrew Hastie said the committee would cast “an unblinking eye” on the $368bn program and improve accountability beyond “surface level” scrutiny. Defence Minister Richard Marles and Assistant Minister Peter Khalil said the body, modelled on the intelligence committee, would strengthen transparency while protecting national security.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122417

>>122429

>>122449

New defence committee to cast ‘unblinking eye’ over AUKUS

BEN PACKHAM - 30 October 2025

Federal parliament is set to establish a powerful new defence committee allowing closer scrutiny of the AUKUS submarine program, Australian Defence Force operations and top-secret military strategies.

The Coalition is set to green-light the new body, modelled on parliament’s intelligence committee, which can receive confidential information without it being publicly disclosed.

The move follows Peter Dutton’s attempt to torpedo the proposal in the last parliament over concerns Greens MPs and other crossbenchers could become members.

The government has reintroduced the parliamentary joint committee on defence (PJCD) bill, to create a more US-style system of defence oversight, with the opposition now set to support it.

Opposition defence spokesman Angus Taylor moved to amend the bill in the parliament on Wednesday night to require membership to be “predicated on support of higher spending on defence, a recognition of the threat environment, and support for the success of AUKUS”.

The condition is aimed at knocking out potential Greens and left-wing independents from serving on the committee.

However, it’s understood the Coalition will back the formation of the committee even if the amendment is not supported, amid assurances by Defence Minister Richard Marles that only government and opposition members will be granted membership.

Former defence spokesman Andrew Hastie, who now sits on the Liberal backbench, expressed support for the committee, saying it would cast “an unblinking eye” on the $368bn AUKUS program that would reach beyond the short-term political cycle.

Mr Hastie, also a former chair of the parliamentary joint committee on intelligence and security, said defence needed to be subjected to similar security as the nation’s spy agencies.

“There is no independent joint defence committee where tough questions can be asked in a classified, protected space,” he told parliament on Wednesday night.

“Parliamentary scrutiny these days is surface level. It amounts to senior Defence leadership presenting a few PowerPoint slides and giving parliamentarians a pat on the head. This is an area of urgently needed reform.”

Mr Hastie said if such a committee had existed when he served as an SAS captain in Afghanistan, the failings of Australia’s war strategy could have been more closely considered, potentially avoiding the war crimes subsequently uncovered by the Brereton Inquiry.

Mr Hastie, who was overruled by Mr Dutton in the last parliament when the Coalition scuttled the bill, said “the internal politics” had now changed.

“I did not have the support of my leadership last term. This is a good bill, it’s the same bill as last time, and I support it now. It’s as simple as that. I’m glad that it’s been brought back, I hope it passes and I hope we establish this committee as quickly as possible,” he said.

Assistant Minister for Defence Peter Khalil said existing oversight of Defence by the parliament was inadequate in balancing accountability, transparency and national security considerations.

“This bill ensures that departments entrusted with extraordinary powers are subject to extraordinary accountability,” he told parliament.

“In a time of evolving security threats, it has never been more important to maintain rigorous, independent oversight of our defence community.”

He said the PJCD would be able to receive and consider classified information to carry out its role.

“This will ensure it has the information needed to conduct effective scrutiny of Defence and its portfolio agencies, thereby strengthening government decision-making on defence and strategic policy,” Mr Khalil said.

Like the legislation that failed to win Coalition support last time around, the bill stipulates the committee would have up to 13 members, including “no more than seven government members and six non-government members from both houses of parliament”.

The opposition previously refused to agree to the wording, arguing it left open the prospect of Greens and independents becoming members.

At the same time, the Greens argued it would become a “secret committee used to prevent even more information being put on the public record in processes like budget estimates”.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/defence/new-defence-committee-to-cast-unblinking-eye-over-aukus/news-story/7c906fae998ed2555c70a786d08d50d2

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122471

File: 21b07b5ee428356⋯.jpg (138.02 KB,1280x720,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 513ef837158593c⋯.jpg (104.75 KB,1280x720,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: b3f6e72556f2c0b⋯.jpg (153.56 KB,1280x720,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23788893 (301021ZOCT25) Notable: Rudd hails Australia’s ‘first-class’ ties with Trump – Australia’s ambassador Kevin Rudd praised Anthony Albanese for maintaining “a first-class working relationship” with Donald Trump while repairing ties with China. Speaking at the Citi A50 Investment Summit, Mr Rudd said Canberra was viewed “positively” in Washington, citing the recent multibillion-dollar critical minerals deal as proof. At an APEC dinner in South Korea, Mr Trump told Mr Albanese, “You’ve done a fantastic job … we’re working together on rare earths.” Mr Rudd said the Prime Minister had “restabilised the China relationship” after disruptions under Scott Morrison, noting that the “strategic tensions” in the region would persist but Australia’s diplomacy was navigating them effectively.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122413

>>122415

>>122424

>>122426

>>122451

>>122452

Rudd hails Australia’s ‘first-class’ ties with Trump

Farid Farid - October 30 2025

Riding high from a successful bilateral meeting with United States President Donald Trump, Australia's ambassador Kevin Rudd has heaped praise on Anthony Albanese for managing the alliance while repairing ties with China.

Shrugging off the tongue-in-cheek personal jabs he received from Mr Trump during a press spray, Mr Rudd told high-powered financial executives at the Citi A50 Sydney Investment Summit Canberra was viewed positively in Washington DC.

"Australia ... is enjoying a first-class working relationship with the Trump administration ... and you've seen some of the practical fruit of that from what the PM agreed to in recent days," he said on Thursday in a gilded room at the Opera House.

Mr Rudd was referring to the multibillion-dollar deal inked earlier in October that gives the US greater access to Australia's critical mineral reserves.

Mr Trump heaped praise on Mr Albanese at an exclusive dinner with other world leaders on Thursday on the sidelines of the APEC summit in South Korea, talking up co-operation between the US and Australia.

"You've done a fantastic job ... we're working together on rare earths, but we're working on a lot of things together and it's working out very well," he said.

In a fireside chat with NSW Treasurer Daniel Mookhey at the Sydney summit, former prime minister Mr Rudd said Mr Albanese was pivotal in restoring ties with China after "there were many disruptions to the trade relationship".

Ties strained to near breaking point under Scott Morrison's tenure before being steadied, but jockeying for political and military influence in the Asia-Pacific has required careful management of links with the US and China.

"The underlying strategic tensions in the region will remain and the practical challenge for statecraft will be how those rolling operational tensions are navigated," Mr Rudd said.

Both Australia and China recently traded barbs over an encounter between their militaries in the South China Sea, most of which is claimed by Beijing as part of its territory.

The government said a Chinese fighter jet dropped flares near one of its patrol planes, prompting Beijing to complain that Canberra was trying to cover up an "intrusion" into Chinese airspace.

Mr Albanese has sidestepped the hiccups and said he hoped trade tensions between the US and China would ease.

"The United States and China have an important role as the two major economic powers that exist in our region," he said.

"These are important relationships for Australia."

The talks between Mr Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping, which Mr Rudd said were "of foundational importance", follow months of friction over tariffs and security.

"We have been able to manage, not only a stable, productive and expansive relationship with the US ... we've also restabilised the China relationship as well," Mr Rudd said.

https://www.canberratimes.com.au/story/9101230/rudd-hails-australias-first-class-ties-with-trump/

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122472

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23796662 (010446ZNOV25) Notable: King Charles strips Andrew of ‘prince’ title and evicts his disgraced brother from Royal Lodge - (Video) Buckingham Palace confirmed that Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor has been stripped of his “prince” title and ordered to vacate Royal Lodge, marking the most severe royal sanction in decades. The King’s brother will relocate to the Sandringham estate in Norfolk, with his new residence privately funded by King Charles. The palace said the move was “necessary” despite Andrew’s continuing denials, adding that “Their Majesties’ thoughts and utmost sympathies remain with the victims and survivors of any and all forms of abuse.” The decision comes days after the release of Virginia Giuffre’s memoir, in which she repeated her claims of being trafficked to Andrew by Jeffrey Epstein at age 17. Her family declared that “an ordinary American girl … brought down a British prince with her truth and extraordinary courage.” The action follows reports Andrew hosted Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell and Harvey Weinstein at Royal Lodge, and had not paid rent for two decades. His ex-wife Sarah Ferguson will make separate living arrangements.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122371

>>122391

>>122392

>>122393

>>122394

King Charles strips Andrew of ‘prince’ title and evicts his disgraced brother from Royal Lodge

JACQUELIN MAGNAY - October 31, 2025

1/3

Andrew has lost his title of “prince’’ and will leave Royal Lodge, Buckingham Palace has announced. The King’s younger brother will now be known as Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor and will move to the Sandringham estate in Norfolk.

In a bombshell statement published on Thursday night in the UK, the palace confirmed the disgraced ex-Duke will “move to alternative private accommodation”. His accommodation will be privately funded by the King, who will also provide him with an appropriate private provision.

It has been confirmed that Andrew will move to Sandringham, the King’s private country retreat, where the royal family gather for Christmas. The 155-year-old main house is reported to have 29 bedrooms, while the 20,000-acre estate is valued at about £60 million.

The estate includes several private properties for staff and tenant farmers, as well as Anmer Hall, which was a wedding gift from Elizabeth to Kate and William.

A palace source told The Times while his former wife, Sarah Ferguson, would be allowed to continue to live with Andrew at a property in Sandringham, they understood that she was unlikely to do so. It brings to an end decades of cohabitation for the couple who have continued to live together despite divorcing in 1996.

Andrew’s daughters, Princess Beatrice and Eugenie, will retain their titles.

The dramatic action is understood to have been delayed by legal and constitutional complexities, but is supported by the government and the wider royal family including Prince William.

The Times reports that the King is understood to have initiated the process of stripping Andrew of his title, and Andrew did not object.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122473

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23796734 (010509ZNOV25) Notable: Video: King Charles strips Andrew of ‘prince’ title – King Charles has formally stripped Andrew of all titles and honours and ordered him to vacate his 30-room Royal Lodge residence, in the most severe royal sanction in modern history. Buckingham Palace confirmed that Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor will move to Sandringham, with accommodation privately funded by the King. The move follows years of fallout from his friendship with convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, and the release of Virginia Giuffre’s memoir detailing alleged abuse. Her family said their sister had “brought down a British prince with her truth and extraordinary courage.” The King’s action removes Andrew’s titles of Duke of York, Earl of Inverness and Baron Killyleagh, and cancels his honours in the Order of the Garter and the Royal Victorian Order. Despite the unprecedented decision, Andrew remains eighth in line to the throne. The British government backed the move, saying it sent “a very powerful message to the victims of grooming and sex offences.”

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122391

>>122392

>>122393

>>122394

>>122472

King Charles strips Andrew of ‘prince’ title

David Crowe - October 31, 2025

1/2

London: King Charles has launched a formal process to cancel the titles and honours of Prince Andrew and will evict him from his Royal Lodge residence in a dramatic sanction over his long friendship with sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.

The new measures go further than the prince’s decision two weeks ago to give up the use of his titles, clearing the way for an official process that will remove his titles, including his position as Duke of York.

Buckingham Palace announced the new steps in a statement on Thursday night in London (6am Friday, AEDT), and said they included a formal notice to Andrew to give up his lease on Royal Lodge.

It is understood that Andrew will move to accommodation on the royal Sandringham Estate in Norfolk, which would be funded privately by the King.

Andrew’s lease on the 30-room Royal Lodge, near Windsor Castle, had been a source of growing controversy because the agreement ran until 2078 and only required him to pay a “peppercorn” rent.

“Prince Andrew will now be known as Andrew Mountbatten Windsor,” the palace said.

“His lease on Royal Lodge has, to date, provided him with legal protection to continue in residence. Formal notice has now been served to surrender the lease.

“These censures are deemed necessary, notwithstanding the fact that he continues to deny the allegations against him.

“Their majesties wish to make clear that their thoughts and utmost sympathies have been, and will remain with, the victims and survivors of any and all forms of abuse.”

In response, the family of Virginia Roberts Giuffre, the woman who accused Andrew of sexual assault and died by suicide earlier this year, described her as “an ordinary American girl” who had “brought down a British prince with her truth and extraordinary courage”.

“Virginia Roberts Giuffre, our sister, a child when she was sexually assaulted by Andrew, never stopped fighting for accountability for what had happened to her and to countless other survivors”, her brother Skye Roberts and sister-in-law Amanda said in a statement reported by the BBC.

“Today, she declares victory.”

The removal of the title of prince is almost unprecedented for the British royal family. In 1917, an Act of Parliament was used to strip the title of Prince Ernest Augustus, a distant relative of King George V, for siding with Germany during the First World War.

And although Prince Harry renounced his royal role in 2020 and moved to California, he remains a prince and the Duke of Sussex.

Despite losing his titles, Andrew remains eighth in line to the throne after William, Prince of Wales, Prince George of Wales, Princess Charlotte of Wales, Prince Louis of Wales, Prince Harry, Duke of Sussex, Prince Archie of Sussex, and Princess Lilibet of Sussex.

According to the BBC, the British government was consulted on the decision and made it clear that it supported the move.

Appearing on the BBC’s Question Time program, Culture Secretary Lisa Nandy said it sent a “very powerful message to the victims of grooming and sex offences”.

Andrew has denied and continues to deny all the allegations made against him.

Immediate effect

The change in Andrew’s name, removing his titles as prince or duke, takes immediate effect.

The moves will not require action by parliament because the King is using his own powers to change the honours and titles that are traditionally conferred by the monarch.

Andrew will formally lose the titles of Prince, Duke of York, Earl of Inverness, Baron Killyleagh and will not be referred to as “His Royal Highness”.

The honours cancelled are his Order of the Garter and Knight Grand Cross of the Royal Victorian Order.

It does not involve any change for his daughters, Princess Beatrice and Princess Eugenie, who will retain their “Her Royal Highness” titles as set out in letters patent from 1917. These established that only the child of a monarch, the child of the sons of a monarch, and the eldest living son of the eldest son of the heir to the throne, could be called prince or princess.

The changes will be made through a series of royal warrants issued by the King to the Lord Chancellor, who will remove the Dukedom of York from the Peerage Roll and take similar actions with the titles of Inverness and Killyleagh.

This is seen as a better way to accomplish the objective rather than through an Act of Parliament, as was used in the case of Prince Ernest Augustus.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122474

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23796758 (010517ZNOV25) Notable: ‘She’d be so proud,’ Virginia Giuffre’s family tell BBC – (Video) The family of Virginia Giuffre have hailed the stripping of Prince Andrew’s title as an “unprecedented” victory, saying their sister had “taken down a prince.” Speaking through tears to BBC Newsnight, her brother Sky Roberts said Giuffre was “celebrating from the heavens now saying ‘I did it’,” adding that “she’d be so proud — he’s just Andrew.” He insisted the move was “not enough” and called for an investigation, saying Andrew “needs to be behind bars.” Giuffre’s sister-in-law Amanda said, “Everything she fought for was not in vain,” describing it as “a moment for her and all survivors.” Buckingham Palace announced King Charles had initiated the formal process to remove Andrew’s titles after emails from 2011 showed he remained in contact with Jeffrey Epstein. The family urged US authorities to release further Epstein files, declaring: “The UK is setting an example for what the US should be doing right now.”

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122391

>>122392

>>122393

>>122394

>>122472

'She'd be so proud,' Virginia Giuffre's family tell BBC

Ottilie Mitchell - 31 October 2025

The family of the late Virginia Giuffre, who accused Prince Andrew of sexual abuse, have celebrated his title of 'prince' being stripped from him as a victory which is "unprecedented in history".

"This normal girl from a normal family has taken down a prince. We are so proud of her," Sky Roberts, Giuffre's brother, told BBC Newsnight through tears.

But Mr Roberts told the BBC removing his title was "not enough" and called for an investigation into Andrew, adding that he "needs to be behind bars". Andrew has denied all claims against him.

Giuffre took her own life earlier this year. The publication of her posthumous memoirs this month intensified pressure on the Royal Family over Andrew's friendship with paedophile financier Jeffrey Epstein.

Buckingham Palace announced on Thursday that King Charles III had initiated a formal process to "remove the style, titles and honours" of Prince Andrew, now known as Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor.

Asked how Giuffre might have responded to that decision, her brother said: "She is celebrating from the heavens now saying 'I did it'."

"She'd be so proud. He's just Andrew."

In her memoir, Giuffre - a prominent accuser of Jeffrey Epstein - alleged Andrew had sex with her three times as a teenager and that he "believed that having sex with me was his birthright."

Andrew, who has denied the allegations, reached an out-of-court settlement with Giuffre in 2022 which contained no admission of liability or apology.

"It truly is a moment for her and all survivors," Giuffre's sister-in-law Amanda Roberts said.

"Everything she fought for was not in vain," she added, noting that she "broke down" when she heard the news at work.

While the pair celebrated what they described as a moment of "victory", Giuffre's brother also stressed it was "not enough".

"We have to have some sort of investigation that goes further into this," he said.

"[Andrew is] still walking around a free man. He needs to be behind bars."

Earlier this month, Andrew voluntarily gave up several royal titles including the Duke of York, saying "we have concluded the continued accusations about me distract from the work of His Majesty and the Royal Family."

The King's decision to strip Andrew of his title of 'prince' follows the emergence this month of emails from 2011 that showed Andrew had maintained contact with Epstein, despite claiming otherwise.

Giuffre's family also addressed the implications of the King's decision for the US, where calls have grown for the release of documents related to Epstein. Partial records have been released that named Andrew as a passenger on a flight with Epstein.

"The US government hold the key to the larger scope of the Jeffrey Epstein case," Mr Roberts said.

"The UK is setting an example for what the US should be doing right now."

"There's many more of them, I promise you."

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cy9pn12w4n8o

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DM-rxvgxvx0

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122475

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23796791 (010553ZNOV25) Notable: Video: Albo and Xi rub shoulders at APEC – Anthony Albanese briefly met Chinese President Xi Jinping at the APEC summit in South Korea, a day after HMAS Ballarat conducted a freedom-of-navigation exercise in the South China Sea. Mr Albanese said he discussed recent talks with Premier Li Qiang and raised concerns about the flare incident involving a Chinese jet. He dismissed escalation claims, saying the exercise was “routine.” The meeting followed eased US-China trade tensions and Beijing’s 12-month delay on rare earth export limits. Mr Albanese said Australia’s minerals were “in demand around the world” and welcomed South Korean investment in lithium and critical minerals. After cordial exchanges with Xi and Donald Trump, he said Australia’s diplomacy was “in good shape,” crediting “consistency in leadership” for stronger international ties.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122448

>>122463

>>122468

>>122469

Albo and Xi rub shoulders at APEC

SARAH ISON - 31 October 2025

Anthony Albanese has spoken with Chinese President Xi Jinping on the sidelines of the APEC summit in South Korea just a day after the Australian Defence Force revealed one of its frigates had traversed the contested waters of the South China Sea in a freedom-of-­navigation exercise.

The brief interaction marked the second time the Prime Minister had come face to face with Mr Xi in the past four months, and followed Mr Albanese on Monday standing by his claim that he had “no reason not to trust” the Chinese President.

The comments were made ­despite a Chinese aircraft having earlier this month fired flares dangerously close to an Australian surveillance plane flying over the South China Sea, prompting Mr Albanese and the leaders of 11 Asian ­nations to urge “self-­restraint” in the region and freedom of navigation and overflight to be respected.

While refusing to divulge details of their encounter in South Korea on Friday, Mr Albanese said he spoke with Mr Xi about “formal discussions” that he had had with Premier Li Qiang, in which he raised concerns over the flare ­incident.

Questioned on the timing of the HMAS Ballarat conducting an exercise in the South China Sea, Mr Albanese said there was “nothing special” about the exercise.

“There are no implications … it’s something we do regularly,” the Prime Minister said.

Mr Albanese also revealed he met US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, who was representing the US after Donald Trump’s departure on Thursday, at the summit.

Mr Trump flew to South Korea chiefly to meet Mr Xi, who is ­attending the APEC summit for the rest of the week. An interim agreement struck between the two leaders temporarily eased trade restrictions on both sides.

China’s 12-month delay of any rare earths export restrictions is ­expected to cool the urgency from the US to progress the recently signed $13bn critical minerals deal with Australia.

Mr Albanese said on Friday he saw opportunities that stretched beyond the US market.

“Australia has these products, critical minerals and rare earths, that are in demand around the world,” he said. “So, yes, we see this as an opportunity, not just an opportunity between Australia and the United States. This is an opportunity for Australian jobs and Australian economic growth.”

Mr Albanese made the comments after meeting South Korean President Lee Jae-myung on Thursday afternoon, when the Labor leader noted the importance of South Korea’s investment in Australia, particularly in lithium, critical minerals and rare earths.

“We have a comprehensive ­strategic partnership, and we want to engage with even stronger ­economic relations in the future,” he said ahead of the closed-door meeting.

Following warm interactions with his Chinese and US counterparts this week – topped by Mr Trump declaring on Wednesday that the Prime Minister was doing a “fantastic job” – Mr Albanese said it was clear Australia’s international engagement was “in good shape”.

In some part, that was because of the “consistency” of those filling Australia’s leadership and foreign affairs portfolio since 2022, he said.

“For a while there, there was a bit of a revolving door in defence ministers, foreign ministers, indeed prime ministers from Australia,” Mr Albanese said.

“It takes time to develop trust and to build relationships. And that, I think, enables Australia to get outcomes which are in the interests of Australians.”

Mr Albanese’s success with global counterparts from China and the US was not shared by everyone this week. Mr Trump declared he had no plans to have an in-person discussion with Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney despite both leaders being in South Korea.

In light of the souring relationship with the US, Canada’s biggest trading partner, Mr Carney sat down with Mr Xi on Friday, in his first ever bilateral meeting with the Chinese President. Asked if he had offered any tips to Mr Carney, Mr Albanese said the Canadian Prime Minister was “not new to global ­engagement”.

“I have found Mark Carney’s friendship and engagement very positive,” he said.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/albo-and-xi-rub-shoulders-at-apec/news-story/c2627a09a5ba8fc3caa4d9b770f4306c

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-2vjThIk_7I

https://www.defence.gov.au/news-events/releases/2025-10-30/australia-conducts-routine-transit-through-south-china-sea

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122476

File: 3a850ca71181eb0⋯.jpg (250.58 KB,1280x720,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 374bb02d240a122⋯.jpg (214.68 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: fb6b5d1c0a4147e⋯.jpg (229.13 KB,2047x1152,2047:1152,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23796903 (010637ZNOV25) Notable: You gain from Kyiv’s pain: envoy blasts Australia’s profit from Ukraine war – Ukraine’s ambassador Vasyl Myroshnychenko has accused Australia of profiting from Russia’s invasion through soaring commodity prices, arguing Canberra has a moral duty to return “many billions” in windfall revenue to Kyiv. In evidence to a parliamentary committee, he said Australia had imported $123 million in fuel refined from Russian “blood oil” in four months — enough, he claimed, to buy 4900 drones used to bomb Ukraine. Mr Myroshnychenko condemned the Albanese government’s “nonsensical” strategy, saying it ignored the rise of a “Russia-China-North Korea co-operative”. He urged Australia to certify fuel imports free of Russian oil and resume aid deliveries, which he said had been “zero” in 2025. Foreign Minister Penny Wong acknowledged Australia lacks the tools to track refined fuel origins but said businesses must avoid funding Russia’s war.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109375 (pb)

>>122367

You gain from Kyiv’s pain: envoy blasts Australia’s profit from Ukraine war

BEN PACKHAM - October 30, 2025

1/2

Ukraine’s top diplomat in Canberra has accused Australia of profiting from Russia’s invasion of his country through soaring commodity prices, arguing the Albanese government has a moral obligation to give Kyiv a share of the “many billions of dollars” in extra revenue flowing into the budget as a result of the war.

In a closed-door presentation to a federal parliamentary committee, ambassador Vasyl Myroshnychenko also warned Australia had funnelled about $123m into Moscow’s coffers in the last four months by purchasing fuel derived from Russian “blood oil” – enough to buy 4900 of the drones it attacks Ukraine with each night.

Mr Myroshnychenko delivered the scathing assessment to the joint standing committee on foreign affairs, defence and trade on Wednesday, arguing Australia’s official strategic narrative on Ukraine was “a nonsensical fiction”. He said the government’s argument that lifting support for Ukraine would detract from ­Australia’s priority activities in the Indo-Pacific was a “false strategic choice” because it ignored the need to prevent “the emergence of an emboldened Russia-China-North Korea co-operative, buoyed by a victory against Ukraine”. The critique comes as Russian forces continue to seize new territory from Ukrainian ­defenders and pound Kyiv with daily missile and drone strikes.

Anthony Albanese has vowed to stand with Ukraine “for as long as it takes”, describing Kyiv’s fight with Russia as “a struggle for the international rule of law”.

In written evidence to the committee obtained by The Australian, Mr Myroshnychenko conveyed his country’s “profound gratitude” for Australia’s long-running support, which now stands at more than $1.5bn worth of military and humanitarian aid.

But he pointed out to the committee’s members that Australia’s contribution to Ukraine’s fight against Russia this year was “zero”. “It is November, and no new contributions have been made to Ukraine in 2025; no military, humanitarian, economic, ­reconstruction or energy contributions,” he said. “Any contribution flows so far this year are holdovers from previous years.”

Mr Myroshnychenko, who ­declined to comment when contacted by The Australian, said Australian officials and international ratings agencies had declared on multiple occasions that the spike in global commodity prices caused by the war had significantly improved Australia’s terms of trade, injecting “many billions of dollars into Australian tax, royalty and other revenue receipts”.

“There is a moral argument for a reasonable proportion of those Australian windfall revenue ­receipts to be transferred to Ukraine as an offset to the suffering and destruction experienced by Ukraine” he said.

The ambassador expressed frustration over the Albanese government’s refusal to end the importation of refined fuel from India and Singapore produced from Russian oil.

“This includes ADF contracts for fuel, where the Australian ­Defence Force’s budget’s money is finding its way into Russian coffers via third country oil ‘laundries’, contrary to global sanctions,” he said.

“Fuel importers into Australia, especially for the ADF, must guarantee their refined fuel is free from Russian upstream oil. It can be done. Other nations insist on it. Australia is lagging.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122477

File: 9fcfaf0147f47d3⋯.jpg (244.03 KB,2000x1334,1000:667,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 65e5a56172b1447⋯.jpg (764.91 KB,4797x3198,3:2,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 6ee589c5a67c843⋯.jpg (2.56 MB,6000x4002,1000:667,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 7355bcc661bba20⋯.jpg (246.22 KB,1241x1755,1241:1755,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23797004 (010716ZNOV25) Notable: Hamas’ court bid to overturn its Australian terror listing – Hamas has asked the Federal Court to overturn its designation as a terrorist organisation, arguing the listing breaches international law, impedes ceasefire talks and legitimises Israeli attacks in Gaza. The application was filed through a case brought by Indigenous activist Robbie Thorpe, who claims the terror designation unlawfully restricts freedom of political communication in Australia by silencing discussion of Palestinian resistance. Hamas’ submission argues the listing “declares as unlawful the armed struggle of the Palestinian people” and unfairly brands Gaza’s civilian population as terror supporters. The Commonwealth is contesting the case, which Jewish leaders called “extraordinary and chilling.” Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke said Hamas continues to meet the terrorism threshold, citing its October 7, 2023 attacks. Hamas plans to lodge a fresh delisting request, while legal expert Ben Saul labelled the proscription “broad and excessive.”

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122289

>>122294

>>122322

>>122354

>>122455

Hamas’ court bid to overturn its Australian terror listing

Matthew Knott - October 31, 2025

1/2

Hamas, the militant Palestinian group that launched the October 7 attacks on Israel, has urged the Australian government to remove its listing as a terror organisation in court documents filed as it embarked upon a ceasefire agreement with the Netanyahu government.

Hamas argued in Federal Court filings lodged this month that the terror listing has breached international law, impeded ceasefire negotiations, exposed its negotiators to assassination and provided legal cover for Israeli attacks that have killed tens of thousands of Palestinians in Gaza.

The nation’s peak Jewish body said it was outraged by the bid for Hamas to be delisted, arguing the court documents “make for extraordinary reading and they reveal something chilling about our country”.

The documents were filed as part of a court case brought by Indigenous activist and radio host Robbie Thorpe, who argues the Hamas terror designation limits freedom of political communication in Australia by chilling discussion of Palestinian strategies to resist Israeli occupation.

The Hamas-led October 7, 2023, attacks killed an estimated 1200 people in Israel and triggered a ferocious response from Israel that was labelled a genocide by a United Nations independent commission of inquiry.

Hamas has claimed responsibility for many high-profile terror attacks in Israel, but its listing was contested because of its nature as a political party and governing authority as well as a militant organisation.

In an October 15 filing, Hamas said the proscription of the entirety of the group, including its political and governing wing, had led to the relatives of Hamas members and the Palestinian people in Gaza more broadly to be regarded as terrorists or terror supporters.

Hamas’ request to intervene was five days after a ceasefire brokered by US President Donald Trump came into effect.

“The ongoing proscription purports to declare as unlawful the armed struggle of the Palestinian people for liberation from unlawful occupation of the Occupied Palestinian Territories, contrary to international law,” Hamas said in the document.

Describing itself as part of “a national army of the Palestinian people”, Hamas said it had been deprived of the opportunity to provide evidence of how the terror listing undermines Palestinian sovereignty and self-determination.

Thorpe, the uncle of independent senator Lidia Thorpe, said that Western nations’ designation of Hamas as a terror group had been used by Israel to justify its fierce conduct in Gaza.

“The government should take them off the list,” he said. “Australia is not in a position to judge what terrorism is.”

The Commonwealth is contesting the court case.

The Hamas request for an interlocutory application, lodged by Thorpe’s lawyer Daniel Taylor, was refused by the court.

Taylor said that the application was provided to him by Hamas’s political bureau, which is based in Doha, Qatar.

Taylor said there was a lot of “propaganda” about Hamas’ activities on October 7, 2023, and that it was unfair for Australia to brand one side of the Hamas-Israel war as a terror group.

He said Hamas intends to file a subsequent application to the Federal Court and to lodge a formal request with the government to be removed from the terror register.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122478

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23797049 (010736ZNOV25) Notable: Video: Victorian treaty passes parliament as authority workforce quadruples – Victoria has become the first Australian state to pass legislation enabling a formal treaty with its Indigenous peoples, marking a historic step in recognising self-determination and dual systems of law. The Treaty Authority — established in 2023 as an independent umpire to oversee negotiations between the government and traditional owner groups — reported its workforce had grown from 10 to 38, with 37 per cent Indigenous staff and an expanded role in facilitating both statewide and local treaties. The new advisory body, Gellung Warl, will guide implementation of the framework built through nearly a decade of consultation. Traditional owner groups, including the Dja Dja Wurrung, are now beginning negotiations for local treaties designed to reflect distinct community priorities, while the statewide treaty will address shared issues such as land, governance, and truth-telling.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122202

>>122203

Victorian treaty passes parliament as authority workforce quadruples

ANTHONY GALLOWAY and LILY MCCAFFREY - October 30, 2025

Victoria’s Treaty Authority, which has a mandate to “uphold two systems of law – Aboriginal and Western”, has quadrupled in size in its second year of operation as it expands its functions to support traditional owner negotiations across the state.

The independent umpire for the treaty process, which was established in December 2023 to oversee ­treaty negotiations between the government and Indigenous Victorians, went from 10 to 38 staff in one year, which ­included the appointment of its ­inaugural chief executive, with 37 per cent of positions held by ­Indigenous Australians.

The disclosures were made in the authority’s 2024-25 annual report, one of more than 240 documents tabled in parliament by the Allan government on Thursday. The opposition labelled the mass release an attempt to avoid scrutiny, with Treasury spokeswoman Jess Wilson saying the reports “laid bare the extent of the Allan government’s financial mismanagement of the state of Victoria”.

“The annual dump day – where we see hundreds of reports ­released at the same time which results in a complete lack of transparency for the Victorian people,” Ms Wilson said.

“Department after department and agency after agency are in the red and operating at a loss as a ­result of the financial mismanagement of this state.”

Victoria made history on Thursday night as the first state or territory in Australia to enact a treaty with its Indigenous population, following the passage of the bill through state parliament.

The advisory body, to be known as Gellung Warl, is the result of almost a decade of formal collaboration between the Aboriginal people of Victoria and the state government. The Treaty Authority is a separate body established in December 2023 as an “umpire” for the treaty process to oversee negotiations between the government and Indigenous Victorians on both the statewide treaty and local treaties. It is independent of the The First Peoples’ Assembly of Victoria and traditional owner groups.

In their introduction to the ­report, the five appointed members of the authority said their mandate was aimed at “ensuring accountability, transparency and trust in the treaty process”.

The five members and the chief executive received total compensation of $2.2m, a little over $366,000 each.

The authority’s wage bill increased by 380 per cent to $5.2m in the last financial year, with staff paid an average salary of $137,000.

The report said the growth ­enabled “several functions previously conducted by external contractors or consultants to move in-house”, and the authority engaged with more than 20 traditional owner groups to assist them on their treaty negotiations.

Under the state’s treaty negotiation framework, traditional owner groups can negotiate their own local treaties, which are separate to the statewide treaty and aim to reflect local priorities.

In May, the Dja Dja Wurrung people of central Victoria announced they had formally notified the Treaty Authority of their intention to negotiate a local ­treaty with the Victorian government, the first traditional owner group in the state to do so.

Opposition Aboriginal affairs spokeswoman Melina Bath said the increase in wages was “more evidence that Labor can’t ­manage money, with wage bills across the public service continuing to blow out”.

She said separate justice systems were a recommendation in the Yoorrook Justice Commission report, which the Liberals and ­Nationals did not support.

In other revelations to emerge from the dumped documents, a Department of Health ­report revealed “sustained pressure” in emergency departments, and showed that many of the state’s health services were failing to meet their performance targets.

Only 65.3 per cent of code 1 emergencies were responded to by Ambulance Victoria within the 15-minute target.

The Suburban Rail Loop Authority’s report revealed four executive employees working on the controversial Suburban Rail Loop were on annual salaries exceeding $500,000.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/indigenous/victorias-treaty-authority-quadruples-workforce/news-story/ce8ae1df3c4d5f1332386456e855904c

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gGy2w2ns3Go

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122479

File: 12858c3cd0f7333⋯.jpg (289.5 KB,1280x858,640:429,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 04a5a2524c72c18⋯.jpg (1.67 MB,5000x3334,2500:1667,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23800853 (020702ZNOV25) Notable: Australian man Peter Williams faces lengthy US jail term after selling trade secrets to Russian broker – Former Australian intelligence officer and cybersecurity executive Peter Joseph Williams has pleaded guilty in a US court to selling trade secrets to a Russian broker for $US1.3m in cryptocurrency. Prosecutors said the 39-year-old stole eight confidential products intended “exclusively for the US government and select allies”, affecting intelligence operations in both the US and Australia. Working under an alias, he sold the data while employed at defence subcontractor Trenchant, a supplier to the Five Eyes network, and even led an internal probe into his own thefts. Senior FBI agent Alexander Arnott said Williams “betrayed the United States and our allies,” while US Attorney-General Pam Bondi warned, “America’s national security is not for sale.” Williams faces up to 20 years’ jail and likely deportation.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Australian man Peter Williams faces lengthy US jail term after selling trade secrets to Russian broker

Riley Stuart - Thu 30 Oct

An Australian intelligence insider and cybersecurity executive is facing more than a decade in a US jail after pleading guilty to selling a Russian broker his employer's trade secrets.

Peter Joseph Williams faced the US District Court in Washington DC on Wednesday, local time, charged with stealing eight trade secrets — a business term used to describe confidential and often valuable material that gives organisations a competitive edge.

While the specific nature of the information Williams stole has not been made public, prosecutor Tejpal Chawla told the court the products were supposed to be sold "exclusively to the US government and select allies".

Mr Chawla said the 39-year-old "admitted his actions had affected intelligence communities in Australia and the United States".

Williams, a US resident, sat quietly and bowed his head as Mr Chawla detailed his crimes to the court.

The prosecutor said the Australian had been paid about $US1.3 million ($2 million) in crypto currency to sell information to a Russian company he was in "regular contact" with over the course of three years from April 2022.

The court was told Williams knew the Russian company could then sell the information on again to whoever it wanted, including the Kremlin.

Mr Chawla told the court Williams had created an alias, John Taylor, to try to cover up his crimes and would have received more money if he had not been caught.

He said the Australian's crimes had cost his employer about $US35 million.

It was not revealed in court but the ABC has confirmed Williams has a long employment history in cybersecurity and intelligence fields, working for both private and public organisations in Australia and the US.

Most recently he was the general manager for defence subcontractor Trenchant, which specialises in cybersecurity and supplies the Five Eyes intelligence network — comprised of Australia, New Zealand, the UK, US and Canada — with hacking tools.

Multiple sources have told the ABC Williams worked for the Australian Signals Directorate (ASD) in the 2010s. The ASD is the national intelligence agency responsible for cybersecurity and foreign signals intelligence and has the capability to conduct offensive cyber operations under the government's direction.

Australian 'betrayed US and its allies'

Williams's guilty plea drew a fierce response from the US government on Wednesday.

"America's national security is not for sale, especially in an evolving threat landscape where cybercrime poses a serious danger to our citizens," Attorney-General Pam Bondi said in a statement released after the hearing.

Prosecutors told the court on Wednesday that authorities notified Williams's employer its trade secrets had been stolen last year and that Williams had led an internal investigation into his own crimes.

Later, however, the FBI launched a probe.

"Peter Williams betrayed the United States and our allies by selling trade secrets," senior FBI agent Alexander Arnott said in a statement released after the hearing.

"The harm caused by his crimes cannot be undone.

"The FBI and our partners will aggressively investigate and hold accountable anyone who threatens US national security."

Williams faces a maximum of 20 years behind bars in the US. During Wednesday's hearing it was revealed he accepted sentencing guidelines that would mean he would spend more than a decade in prison.

Presiding Judge Loren AliKhan warned the Australian he would be deported after any custodial sentence and that she could imprison him for longer.

"It's very important no-one has promised you anything about what I'm going to do [in sentencing]," she told Williams in court.

Court documents filed earlier this month revealed authorities had seized Williams's house in Washington DC as part of the case, as well as funds in multiple bank accounts, a collection of 22 watches, including five fake Rolexes, and high-end jewellery, clothing and accessories.

Williams did not speak much during his court appearance, but told the judge he had been receiving treatment for depression and anxiety.

He will remain under home detention in Washington DC until his sentencing hearing on January 27, but a lengthy jail term appears inevitable.

"Oh, he's going to get a custodial sentence," Williams's lawyer John Rowley told the ABC outside court.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-10-30/peter-williams-faces-us-jail-time-after-selling-trade-secrets/105945752

https://www.justice.gov/usao-dc/pr/former-general-manager-us-defense-contractor-pleads-guilty-selling-stolen-trade-secrets

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122480

File: 1de65140f881d36⋯.mp4 (15.84 MB,640x360,16:9,Clipboard.mp4)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23800897 (020730ZNOV25) Notable: Video: Queensland pedophile register to launch with names, photos by December – Queensland will become the first state to introduce a public sex offender register under Daniel’s Law, named in honour of murdered schoolboy Daniel Morcombe, whose 2003 abduction and killing exposed critical failings in child protection and offender monitoring. Passed by parliament on Thursday, the legislation will allow parents to identify convicted child sex offenders by name, photograph and year of birth through a three-tier system. Tier 1 will list offenders under supervision or who have breached reporting rules; Tier 2 will allow searches for high-risk offenders in local areas; and Tier 3 will let parents apply to check specific individuals with child contact. Premier David Crisafulli said the law ends “the days of monsters hiding in plain sight,” while Police Minister Dan Purdie said it was about “vigilance, not vengeance.” Misuse carries penalties of up to 10 years’ jail. Daniel’s parents, Bruce and Denise Morcombe said Daniel’s Law would “save other children” and inspire nationwide adoption.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109577 (pb)

Qld pedophile register to launch with names, photos by December

Queensland parents will soon be able to identify convicted pedophiles in their neighbourhood, under landmark laws. WHAT YOU CAN AND CAN’T DO

Mikaela Mulveney - October 30, 2025

1/2

Queenslanders will be able to access the name, photograph and year of birth of pedophiles on a public sex offender register by December.

The state government will on Thursday pass new laws, dubbed Daniel’s Law after murdered schoolboy Daniel Morcombe, which will allow the public to apply to view images of child sex offenders living in their community.

The Courier-Mail can reveal how the register’s three-tiered system is expected to arm parents with information about local sexual predators in an move to keep children safe.

Premier David Crisafulli said no system would ever be perfect, but Daniel’s Law would help parents protect children.

“Families previously had no idea if convicted predators were living on their street or even next door, but the days of monsters hiding in plain sight are now over,” he said.

Police Minister Dan Purdie acknowledged the register was not designed to be fail-safe, and would not deter all predators from committing heinous crimes against children.

“It really is just about arming parents and caregivers with all the information they might need to be able to put protective strategies around their children,” he said.

“There will be a clear deterrent for registered child sex offenders to abide by their reporting obligations, and if they fail to abide by it, and they go AWOL, well, we’re going to publish their picture and their name.”

Close to 4000 reportable offenders were recorded on the Queensland Child Protection Register as of the end of September.

When the new system is in plane, every Queenslander will be able to access a list of convicted pedophiles who are subject to reporting conditions to police and their photos.

This Tier 1 list included offenders released from jail on supervision orders for child sex offences, offenders who have failed to comply with obligations and those whose whereabouts are unknown.

Alongside an offender’s photo and unique identifier number will be additional personal details, which could include their full name, year of birth and tattoos or other distinguishing characteristics.

Details will be determined by Police Commissioner Steve Gollschewski, who will also decide which tier an offender is published under.

Tier 2 will see Queenslanders able to search for high-risk convicted offenders based on where they live and to view images of high-risk reportable offenders residing in their local area.

This list will include repeat offenders, those with life-long reporting obligations and offenders who are subject to a supervision order.

Mr Gollschewski can use his discretion to add an offender to this list if they pose a serious threat to the safety of a child.

The final Tier 3 will give parents and guardians the option to make an application about an individual to check if they are a reportable offender.

They will have to satisfy police that the person had unsupervised contact with a child and will be provided a yes or no answer only.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122481

File: 58f5e83bc675694⋯.jpg (251.32 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: be0a11443fb55e9⋯.jpg (143.03 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: a4f99064c8e3b9d⋯.jpg (159.92 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23800933 (020746ZNOV25) Notable: ‘Trying to silence me’: Outspoken doctor sacked amid transgender legal battle – Queensland child psychiatrist Dr Jillian Spencer has been issued a termination notice while multiple court cases over her suspension and whistleblower protection remain unresolved. Dr Spencer, who publicly criticised “trans-affirming” treatments for minors, said her dismissal came a month before an independent review into puberty blockers and hormones - chaired by Professor Ruth Vine - was due to report to Health Minister Tim Nicholls. “They are jumping the gun without waiting to establish whether the whistleblower claim is true,” she said, accusing Queensland Health of trying to silence her. Her dismissal letter cited breaches of the code of conduct for speaking publicly about her concerns. Graeme Haycroft of the Red Union Support Hub called the sacking “a miscarriage of justice.” Dr Spencer said she stood by her warnings that gender-affirming care “is harmful to children” and vowed to keep fighting in court.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

‘Trying to silence me’: Outspoken doctor sacked amid transgender legal battle

Queensland’s health department has been sent a termination notice to child psychiatrist Jillian Spencer while multiple legal challenges about her whistleblower status remain unresolved.

'Des Houghton - September 13, 2025''

Suspended child psychiatrist Jillian Spencer has been sent a termination notice – a month before an independent panel delivers its findings into the transgender medical practices she said were unsafe.

The timing has angered her professional association which has accused the Crisafulli government of a miscarriage of justice and attempting to subvert the courts.

Dr Spencer’s termination notice also comes before the industrial relations court has adjudicated her whistleblower status.

It also comes ahead of another legal challenge in which Dr Spencer alleges Queensland Health breached her human rights under the Anti-Discrimination Act.

“They are jumping the gun without waiting to establish whether the whistleblower claim is actually true,” Dr Spencer said.

“They are not waiting for the court to decide. They are going ahead and firing me.’’

She said official whistleblower status would have given her protection against retribution and reprisals.

The independent review into puberty blockers and same sex hormones chaired by Professor Ruth vine was due to hand it findings to Health Minister Tim Nicholls by November 30.

“Why haven’t they waited for that?” Dr Spencer said.

“Is the hospital trying to silence me; get rid of me in advance of any external scrutiny?

“I am not sure if the hospital is out of control and is acting unilaterally, or whether the Health Minister is bringing his morals and values to what is going on.

“I don’t know where this injustice is coming from. Is it coming from the hospital or from the Health Minister’s office.”

Dr Spencer says she still believes she did the right thing by “shining a light” on the dangers of “trans-affirming practices.”

“When I first raised concerns in 2023 it was a culture of fear and silence,” she said.

In the last two years that all changed and many people had raised the alarm.

“It’s now common knowledge that gender affirming care is harmful to children,’’ Dr Spencer said.

“I have been a strong voice to try to protect children, and I am still getting punished for that.’’

Her 59-page termination letter lists occasions where she allegedly broke the code of conduct by speaking on Sky News and at public meetings.

“Don’t we want doctors to speak up when there is harm to children?”

“I’m happy for my conduct and behaviours to be examined (in court). People will find that I did everything I could to try to protect children.

“I’m proud of what I did. I’m sad it may the ending of my career.

“They are using the code of conduct to stop me speaking out about a medical scandal. I have to criticise the hospital because it is responsible for the medical scandal.”

Graeme Haycroft, the chairman of RUSH (Red Union Support Hub) said he believed Dr Spencer had been denied natural justice.

He condemned Mr Nicholls who he said had failed to protect a doctor with an exemplary record.

“Jillian Spencer has been badly done by,” Mr Haycroft said.

“It is a miscarriage of justice.

“This goes to the core of the cultural problems within Queensland Health.”

https://www.couriermail.com.au/news/queensland/qld-politics/trying-to-silence-me-outspoken-doctor-sacked-amid-transgender-legal-battle/news-story/57b3adc38068593e84224161d2980e11

https://www.hrla.org.au/dr-jillian-spencer-s-job-termination-is-on-hold-pending-judicial-review

https://www.hrla.org.au/spencer-speak-out

https://qresear.ch/?q=Jillian+Spencer

https://qresear.ch/?q=Cass+Review

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122482

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23800947 (020753ZNOV25) Notable: Video: Queensland Health forced to pause Dr Jillian Spencer dismissal as she takes legal action over political discrimination – Suspended child psychiatrist Dr Jillian Spencer has won a temporary reprieve from termination as the Supreme Court of Queensland reviews whether her dismissal breached constitutional and human rights protections. Dr Spencer, who was stood down for criticising gender-affirming care for minors, argues Queensland Health ignored her freedom of political expression and obligations under the Human Rights Act when moving to fire her. Backed by the Human Rights Law Alliance, she claims she was punished for expressing medically grounded dissent, not misconduct. Dr Spencer continues to await a ruling on her separate whistleblower application, pending for 17 months. She told Sky News the stay “gives me a fighting chance,” insisting her stance against early “social transition” and puberty blockers was about child safety and evidence-based practice. “This is about medical integrity and the right to speak freely,” she said.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122481

Queensland Health forced to pause Dr Jillian Spencer dismissal as she takes legal action over political discrimination

Suspended child psychiatrist Dr Jillian Spencer says her fight for reinstatement at the Queensland Children’s Hospital is “far from over” after Queensland Health’s bid to terminate her was halted pending a Supreme Court judicial review.

Conor Breslin - October 28, 2025

1/2

Psychiatrist Dr Jillian Spencer says her termination from the Queensland Children’s Hospital has been placed on hold after she launched a Supreme Court challenge against Queensland Health, arguing her sacking breached her constitutional and human rights.

Appearing on Sky News host Peta Credlin’s program, Dr Spencer confirmed her lawyers had secured a stay on her dismissal as the court reviews whether Queensland Health unlawfully ignored her right to freedom of political expression and her protections under the Human Rights Act.

“I think the last time that I spoke to you, I was desperately hoping that a Queensland Health Minister, Mr Tim Nicholls, would intervene to prevent me from being fired, but unfortunately, he decided not to do that,” Dr Spencer said.

“So, thank heavens for good lawyers and my lawyers have lodged a Supreme Court judicial review of the termination on two grounds: the first being that the notice didn’t consider my right to freedom of political expression under the Constitution and the second that the notice didn’t consider my human rights under the Human Rights Act.”

Dr Spencer said the legal move has given her temporary protection from being formally dismissed until the matter is resolved by the court.

“So, that gives me a stay of termination until that judgement is delivered,” she said.

“I’m also still waiting for the whistleblower decision through the Industrial Relations Commission. I’ve been waiting on that for 17 months now and all my hopes are resting on Commissioner Christopher Gazenbeek.”

Dr Spencer, who was suspended last year after questioning the gender-affirmation model used to treat children at the Queensland Children’s Hospital, has maintained she was fulfilling her professional duty by raising ethical and medical concerns about the practice.

Her stance - warning that early “social transition” and medical interventions such as puberty blockers can cause psychological harm - has sparked fierce debate across the medical community.

“What we know from the clinical experience from the underground network of very brave clinicians who are treating children with gender distress, with an exploratory approach, and not affirming them, is that early affirmation really locks in the gender distress,” she told Credlin.

“So, children who are socially transitioned can get really stuck and preoccupied with how they’re appearing and concerned about how other people are perceiving them.

“They get used to pretending to be someone they’re not and it really takes over their lives.”

Dr Spencer said the “exploratory method”, as opposed to the affirmation model, encourages clinicians to take a holistic approach to children’s distress - exploring potential psychological or environmental factors rather than assuming a child is inherently transgender.

“You take an open mind about what’s going on for the child,” she said.

“You consider that other experiences and historical experiences in their life, or even current experiences, may be contributing to their distress, so you keep an open mind rather than assuming that the child is naturally trans and gender diverse.”

“You give the child time to explore their identity, all without the harm of medicalisation.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122483

File: d1c15cef8479a15⋯.jpg (278.05 KB,2048x1536,4:3,Clipboard.jpg)

File: bf445a773b29478⋯.jpg (268.85 KB,2048x1536,4:3,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23800976 (020805ZNOV25) Notable: Dr Jillian Spencer’s Queensland Health termination frozen amid legal battle – Queensland Health has paused its bid to sack Dr Jillian Spencer, the child psychiatrist suspended for questioning “transgender activism” at the Queensland Children’s Hospital. Her lawyers at Meridian Lawyers filed for a Supreme Court judicial review, arguing acting clinical director Brendan Hoad failed to consider her freedom of political communication and Human Rights Act protections before issuing a termination notice. Dr Spencer said she was duty-bound by the Hippocratic oath to oppose unsafe treatments, claiming puberty blockers and early affirmation “don’t have evidence of benefit and have serious harms.” She maintains doctors must prioritise patients over institutional loyalty. Other psychiatrists have backed her stance, citing the UK’s Cass Review and a Family Court ruling where Judge Andrew Strum criticised Australia’s gender-affirming guidelines. “I thought I was doing everyone a favour by speaking up,” she said. The case will return to court next year alongside her pending whistleblower claim.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122481

>>122482

Des Houghton: Dr Jillian Spencer's Qld Health termination frozen amid legal battle

Des Houghton - October 29, 2025

1/2

Child psychiatrist Jillian Spencer’s termination notice has been put on hold by Queensland Health.

However the doctor who was suspended for speaking out about transgender activism at the Queensland Children’s Hospital says her fight to be reinstated is far from over.

Meridian Lawyers, for Spencer, filed an application in the Supreme Court this week for a judicial review that seeks to invalidate Spencer’s termination notice signed by Brendan Hoad, the acting director of clinical services.

Hoad and the Queensland Children’s Hospital and Health Service have been named as respondents in the application.

Hoad’s assessment in September found Spencer guilty of misconduct for “continuing to make statements in the public domain that bring your employer and (children’s health service) colleagues into disrepute”.

Spencer’s legal team, led by Daniel Davison, told the court the threat of disciplinary sanctions and dismissal should be set aside because of Hoad’s “failure to have regard to the implied freedom of political communication under the Constitution in deciding whether he (Hoad) was reasonably satisfied (Spencer’s) conduct met the standard of ‘inappropriate or improper conduct in a private capacity’.”

Meridian’s lawyers argued Hoad also failed to take into account the Human Rights Act when deciding whether he was reasonably satisfied Spencer’s conduct met the standards of “inappropriate or improper conduct in a private capacity”.

Health Minister Tim Nicholls declined to comment.

The case drags on and on.

Spencer must now wait for a directions hearing set down for next year.

Spencer is also awaiting a judgment in the Queensland Industrial Relations Commission where she is seeking whistleblower status for her public interest disclosures.

Spencer was suspended in 2023 after she questioned the “affirmation model” and the use of puberty blockers at the Queensland Children’s Gender Service at the Queensland Children’s Hospital.

The model has been discredited in many countries, so it is a mystery why Queensland Health continued to target Spencer.

She maintains she had a professional obligation to raise the alarm as the Hippocratic oath compels her to put the welfare of her patients ahead of possible reputational damage to the hospital.

“The reason why I spoke out is because I saw children being given a treatment that doesn’t have any evidence of benefit and has serious harms,” she said.

“It was too important not to speak out about.

“I can’t be bound by some public service rules not to speak out when I am forced to witness the ongoing harm to children.

“I don’t think the Code of Conduct for the Queensland Public Service should be used to suppress speech about a medical scandal.

“I would like a full exoneration.

“As a doctor, my primary loyalty is to the patient.”

Her Hippocratic oath duty to “first do no harm” trumped all.

Spencer also quibbles the hospital’s lawful right to offer criticism.

“It’s not to my employer, because otherwise doctors just become a company representative.

“No, I can’t just represent the hospital and say, ‘things are OK’ when they’re not.’’

Spencer raised other concerns with her termination letter which she said contained several factual errors.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122484

File: 3dc23e8e00cb864⋯.mp4 (15.42 MB,640x360,16:9,Clipboard.mp4)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23801001 (020818ZNOV25) Notable: Video: Queensland Health puberty blocker, hormone treatment ban unlawful, court rules – The Queensland Supreme Court has ruled the state government’s puberty blocker ban unlawful, finding Queensland Health failed to conduct proper consultation before issuing the January 28 directive. Justice Peter Callaghan SC said the 22-minute meeting used to justify the ban “had every hallmark” of a predetermined decision. Within hours, Health Minister Tim Nicholls reissued the statewide prohibition under his own authority, citing the “public interest.” The case, brought by the mother of a transgender child, accused the government of treating minors as “political footballs.” Advocacy groups, including the LGBTI Legal Service, condemned the renewed ban, saying it lacked medical evidence and excluded expert input. Mr Nicholls said the government’s position “remains unchanged,” insisting treatment must be “grounded on solid evidence.” The directive will stand until completion of Professor Ruth Vine’s independent review into stage one and two hormone therapies, due by November 30.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122481

>>122482

>>122483

Queensland Health puberty blocker, hormone treatment ban unlawful, court rules

Paul Brescia and Mikaela Mulveney - October 29, 2025

1/2

Health Minister Tim Nicholls has used his extraordinary powers to reissue a statewide ban on puberty blockers – seven hours after a Supreme Court slammed the government for unlawful overreach.

Under the reissued directive the Minister did not need to outline why he believed gender dysphoric children not already being treated with puberty blockers shouldn’t be able to access them through the public health system, only that he believed it was “in the public interest”.

The move came after Supreme Court Justice Peter Callaghan SC, in a landmark decision just before midday on Tuesday, ruled the government’s initial puberty blocker ban was made unlawfully.

He deemed the amount of consultation undertaken by Queensland Health director-general David Rosengren in the lead-up to the January 28 directive – a 22-minute online meeting with health service bosses – insufficient.

The rebuke by the Supreme Court is the first high-profile admonishment of the Crisafulli government’s decision-making since it took office last year.

It also came on the same day Mr Nicholls faced accusations he had not delivered an ambulance ramping road map as promised, as the corruption watchdog confirmed the botched appointment of Krispin Hajkowicz as chief health officer had escalated to a full investigation.

Justice Callaghan said the 22-minute meeting “had every hallmark” of an occasion convened for Dr Rosengren to announce the directive was “what is going to be done”.

In his decision, he had pointed out the minister could have from the start simply issued his own directive “in writing and published in a way that allows it to be accessed by members of the public” rather than through Dr Rosengren.

“There can be in this case no suggestion that the minister was trying to circumvent the requirement of (Hospital and Health Boards) Act,” he said.

“On the contrary, rather than suggest this was a suggestion of the chief executive, the minister could not have been more open about his intentions, nor more insistent on his ownership of the decision.”

The Supreme Court action against the state government was brought by the mother of a transgender child, with the woman calling on Premier David Crisafulli to stop using trans kids as “political footballs”.

She said the speedy move to reissue the directive shows this was “clearly a political decision”.

“My child’s medical treatment was ultimately decided by the government, with no input from anyone with expertise,” the mother said.

“I don’t know any Queenslander who would want decisions about their child’s medical care being made by politicians.

“The Premier says he wants to keep kids safe.

“There is nothing safe about denying a child their right to expert medical care, or telling parents they don’t know what’s best for their children.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122485

File: bba769314d5cf23⋯.jpg (136.05 KB,1280x720,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: f7bbd353786c46b⋯.jpg (233.45 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 734e47b3a8946fc⋯.jpg (676.7 KB,1275x1650,17:22,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 828d1c295b6d373⋯.jpg (810.56 KB,1275x1650,17:22,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 66844063175643b⋯.jpg (827.81 KB,1275x1650,17:22,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23801047 (020846ZNOV25) Notable: eSafety boss hits back at Trump ally over claims Australia threatens US free speech – Australia’s eSafety Commissioner Julie Inman Grant has rejected accusations by US Republican congressman Jim Jordan that Australia is undermining free speech in the United States. Mr Jordan, a close ally of Donald Trump and chair of the House Judiciary Committee, launched an inquiry into Stanford University’s Cyber Policy Centre after it hosted Ms Inman Grant in September, alleging it “facilitated foreign censorship”. Ms Inman Grant said eSafety “has nothing to do with achieving global censorship”, insisting that all companies must obey Australian law when displaying content to Australians. The clash highlights growing tensions between the Albanese government’s tech regulation and conservative US concerns about free expression.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122196

>>122249

>>122304

>>122364

>>122375

eSafety boss hits back at Trump ally over claims Australia threatens US free speech

GEOFF CHAMBERS - 2 November 2025

1/2

The eSafety Commissioner Julie Inman Grant has hit back at Don­ald Trump’s close ally Jim Jordan after the Republican congressman accused Australia and other nations of undermining free speech in the US and promoting global take-downs of online ­content.

Mr Jordan, who chairs the US house judiciary committee, has launched an investigation into Stanford University’s Cyber Policy Centre, which has links to the eSafety Commissioner and hosted Ms Inman Grant as a keynote speaker on September 24.

In an October 22 letter sent to Stanford University Cyber Policy Centre director Jeff Hancock, Mr Jordan said the centre appeared to be “facilitating foreign censorship that harms American civil liberties”.

Mr Jordan told Dr Hancock the roundtable event featuring Ms Inman Grant “brought together foreign officials who have directly targeted American speech and represent a serious threat to the First Amendment”.

“The keynote speaker at this event was Julie Inman Grant, the Australian eSafety Commissioner who has explicitly argued that governments have the authority to demand and enforce global take-downs of content,” Mr Jordan wrote.

“Other attendees and panellists included officials from some of the entities with the worst track records of extraterritorial censorship, including the United Kingdom’s Ofcom, the EU, and Brazil.

“By hosting this event, designed to encourage and facilitate censorship compliance with regulators from Australia, Brazil, the EU and the UK, Stanford is working with foreign censorship officials to vitiate the First Amendment.”

On September 25, around the same time Ms Inman Grant was participating in events with the university’s cyber policy centre, she announced the Stanford Social Media Lab, founded by Dr Hancock, was leading an academic review of the Albanese government’s Social Media Mini­mum Age obligation.

The government’s social media ban for children under 16 starts on December 10.

In response to Mr Jordan’s investigation and claims, Ms Inman Grant told The Australian that the enforcement of Australian laws had nothing to do with achieving global censorship.

“There is nothing eSafety is doing that prevents American companies from displaying whatever they wish to Americans, however all companies that operate in Australia must comply with Australian laws, including when they are displaying content to Australian end users, regardless of where they are based,” she said.

After she sought to block online access to the 2024 terror stabbing attack of Bishop Mar Mari Emmanuel in Sydney, the Federal Court refused to grant an injunction, which was contested by Elon Musk’s X, because an effective global ban was deemed to not be a “reasonable” step under Australian law and would be “ignored or disparaged in other countries”.

Ms Inman Grant in October issued a removal notice to social media giant X and Meta in relation to the murder of Ukrainian-born US resident Iryna Zarutska, the assassination of Charlie Kirk and the beheading of Chandra Mouli Nagamallaiah.

The eSafety Commissioner told The Australian they had “accepted geoblocking in the Charlie Kirk, Iryna Zarutska and Chandra Mouli Nagamallaiah matters where the material has been refused classification by the Aus­tralian Classification Board and is therefore illegal to display to ­Australians”.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122486

File: 544a1f06b4edd59⋯.jpg (338.41 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 0b447ae0c22d332⋯.jpg (455.31 KB,2048x1536,4:3,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23805280 (031015ZNOV25) Notable: Queensland education authority offers ‘they/them’ pronouns for kindergarten kids – Parents in Queensland have been asked to specify “they/them” pronouns for their four- and five-year-olds on kindergarten consent forms, prompting criticism from psychiatrists who warned the practice could harm children’s development. The Queensland Curriculum & Assessment Authority recorded 46 “they/them” nominations this year, though many parents expressed shock at the requirement. Psychiatrists Andrew Amos, Philip Morris and Jillian Spencer said the policy “damages the child” and risks “indoctrination” into ideology. Education Minister John-Paul Langbroek said the QCAA is independent and introduced the measure to “foster inclusion”, but critics argue it confuses children and pressures teachers to comply with gender ideology.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122481

>>122482

>>122483

Queensland education authority offers ‘they/them’ pronouns for kindergarten kids

STEPHEN RICE - November 02, 2025

1/2

Parents are being asked whether they want “they/them” pronouns used for their four- and five-year-old children attending kindergarten in Queensland, in a move condemned by psychiatrists as damaging to the individual child and to the other children in the classroom.

In this year’s cohort, 46 kindergarten children around the state were nominated by their parents as “they/them” on consent forms sent out by the Queensland Curriculum & Assessment Authority.

Kindergarten teachers in Queensland prepare a “transition statement” to help children prepare for primary school, providing information to their new teachers about the child’s strengths and weaknesses.

But many parents have been shocked to discover that they must nominate their child’s pronouns as part of the process.

Several psychiatrists told The Australian that introducing the concept to children at such a young age was harmful to their development, and for family and school relationships.

Queensland mother Nerissa Pace, whose four-year-old daughter is at kindergarten, described the move as “utterly outrageous and pure nonsense”.

“Why is the Queensland government pushing the radical gender ideology of a ‘non-binary’ child – neither male nor female – onto pre-school kids?” Ms Pace asked. “These are four- and five-year-old kids who have no concept of what ‘they/them’ as a pronoun even means, and the ­notion that a kid can be neither a boy nor a girl, and that other children and the teachers and the whole school cohort would have to then support that radical delusion, is gobsmacking. It compels teachers and it totally denies their right to acknowledge reality. It would confuse the hell out of these kids. It’s horrendous.”

Prominent psychiatrist and James Cook University academic Andrew Amos said the approach of QCAA was “not acceptable on a number of levels and very ­concerning”.

“I don’t think kids of that age are even capable of understanding the underlying concepts. It’s damaging for the children, but I think it’s also damaging to the family structure. The boundaries that you set for kids really have a large part to play in whether they’re going to be happy, healthy and functional, and this is really indoctrination into a particular political ideology that damages the child at school, but also at home.

“You’re misusing the trusted relationship between a teacher who is an expert in child education and a parent who trusts that teacher to know what’s best for their kids in a way that’s definitely harmful for the child, and I think is harmful to the relationship between the child and the parent.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122487

File: 82222f3d8d684d0⋯.jpg (143.65 KB,960x640,3:2,Clipboard.jpg)

File: a5bec9fe0b505ef⋯.jpg (70.98 KB,960x640,3:2,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 59ef94a01c9b32a⋯.jpg (117.89 KB,960x640,3:2,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 90d3019d31c21ba⋯.jpg (129.53 KB,960x640,3:2,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 7302de3884481ce⋯.jpg (120.36 KB,960x640,3:2,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23809042 (040838ZNOV25) Notable: China’s military build-up demands response, Australia defence minister says – Australia’s Defence Minister Richard Marles has warned that China’s “biggest military build-up in the world today”, carried out “without strategic reassurance”, demands a response from other nations. Speaking at a navy conference in Sydney, he said Australia’s sea trade routes through the South and East China Seas are becoming “increasingly risky”. Marles outlined plans for a “more capable, lethal, long-range navy”, including acquiring frigates from Japan, developing submarine drones with US company Anduril, and expanding Indian Ocean shipyards. His remarks come after a Chinese fighter jet dropped flares near an Australian patrol aircraft, amid growing tension as Australia advances its AUKUS nuclear submarine program with the US and UK.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122405

>>122428

>>122457

>>122463

>>122475

China's military build-up demands response, Australia defence minister says

Kirsty Needham - November 4, 2025

SYDNEY, Nov 4 (Reuters) - Australia's defence force operations to protect its sea trade routes, including through the South China Sea, are becoming more risky as Beijing undertakes the "biggest military build-up in the world today", Australia's defence minister said on Tuesday.

Open sea lanes, including trade routes that go through the South China Sea and East China Sea, are at the core of Australia's national interest, Richard Marles said in an opening speech at a navy conference in Sydney.

"That work is challenging and in truth it is becoming increasingly risky. The biggest military build-up in the world today is China," he told the Indo-Pacific conference.

"That it is happening without strategic reassurance means that for Australia and so many countries a response is demanded."

About 100 protesters, including pro-Palestinian groups, gathered outside the conference centre in Darling Harbour in Sydney. New South Wales state police said 10 people were arrested and pepper spray was used after clashes with officers.

Several Israeli companies are exhibiting at the defence conference.

Marles said Australia was increasing its military spending to build a "more capable, lethal, long-range navy".

This included acquiring frigates from Japan, developing submarine drones with U.S. company Anduril, and expanding its naval shipyards facing the Indian Ocean.

Australia raised concerns with Beijing last month after a Chinese fighter jet dropped flares near an Australian maritime patrol plane carrying out surveillance in the South China Sea, the latest in a series of such incidents that Australia has labelled "unsafe and unprofessional".

Dozens of navy and coast guard chiefs, including from the United States, Japan, the Philippines, Singapore and Pacific Islands, are attending the conference in Sydney, which comes as Australia prepares to build a nuclear-powered submarine fleet with the U.S. and Britain through the AUKUS partnership.

https://www.reuters.com/world/china/chinas-military-build-up-demands-response-australia-defence-minister-says-2025-11-03/

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122488

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23809081 (040915ZNOV25) Notable: Video: Chaos as pro-Palestine protesters blockade arms expo – Thirteen protesters have been arrested after a pro-Palestine “blockade” outside Sydney’s Indo Pacific International Maritime Exposition turned violent. Police used pepper spray as activists clashed with officers, with two police injured and several protesters alleging brutality. Palestine Action Group organiser Joshua Lees said he was “blinded” by pepper spray, accusing police of targeting him. Superintendent Paul Dunstan said officers were “set upon” and confirmed charges for assaulting police and resisting arrest. The protesters condemned the NSW government-sponsored event, which hosted major arms firms including BAE Systems and Lockheed Martin. Inside, Defence Industry Minister Pat Conroy defended Australia’s defence partnerships while calling for protest “respect”.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109477 (pb)

>>122355

>>122385

>>122487

Chaos as pro-Palestine protesters blockade arms expo

NATHAN SCHMIDT and CLAREESE PACKER - 4 November 2025

1/3

A pro-Palestine activist was “surrounded” by police in a dramatic end to a press conference after an officer vowed more than a dozen protesters would be charged over a weapons expo protest.

Police have arrested 13 protesters after moving to break up a pro-Palestine “blockade” of a weapons expo sponsored by the NSW government in Sydney’s Darling Harbour.

No charges have yet been laid, but Superintendent Paul Dunstan confirmed that 13 people would be charged with offences including assaulting police and resisting arrest while addressing the media on Tuesday afternoon.

Protesters had been waiting for those arrested outside the Day Street Police Station in the city’s CBD on Wednesday when police set up the press conference concerning the 13 arrests.

Palestine Action Group (PAG) organiser Joshua Lees indicated that he would similarly address the media afterwards; however, Superintendent Dunstan’s press conference came to a dramatic end when Mr Lees was surrounded by police.

Mr Lees attempted to ask a question after reporters finished speaking with Mr Dunstan, who immediately told the activist that it was “not the time or the place”.

“It’s a respectful question,” Mr Lees interjected.

“Josh, I will speak to you after this has occurred, I am not engaging in conversations with you now, Mr Lees,” Superintendent Dunstan said.

Four officers then moved over to Mr Lees, with one placing his hands on the activist’s chest and moving him back.

The officers dispersed shortly afterwards, with Mr Lees later claiming police threatened him with arrest.

Mr Lees was trying to ask the officer if police had investigated the expo and the companies involved, claiming that some attendees had committed war crimes and genocide.

Mr Lees will not be charged in relation to Tuesday’s protest.

Officers injured during weapons protest

Superintendent Dunstan said police were “set upon” by a large group of protesters that entered an exclusion zone on Tuesday morning.

“Police did not go out and attempt to use force this morning, we were set upon by a pack of very angry protesters, and were required to use an amount of force,” he said.

Pepper spray was used during the ordeal before protesters picked up barricades and pushed them in the direction of police before throwing a bucket of paint at officers.

Two officers were injured in the ordeal, with one suffering a laceration to his nose and a second copping paint in his eye that needed to be flushed.

Mr Lees insisted peaceful protesters were set upon and “attacked”, telling reporters he had been “blinded” after he was pepper sprayed.

“The police know who I am as a protest organiser, and they immediately targeted me and pepper sprayed me in the face from a distance of about 1m,” he said.

“I was blinded and in great pain for 20 minutes or so. This is the kind of police brutality which has been meted out to peaceful protesters today.

“This is an outrage, and of course we are going to keep protesting until Palestine is free.”

Negotiations were eventually reached between police and protesters on Tuesday, and a march from Liverpool St to George St ensued. Protesters left safely afterwards.

Superintendent Dunstan said Tuesday’s events were “entirely out of character” and “disappointing” given the good relationship police had with the PAG over the last few years.

“All the goodwill and work with that group has really been damaged from what has occurred today,” he said.

Superintendent Dunstan claimed no Form 1 had been submitted, while Mr Lees argued there was no need for one.

Mr Lees further claimed that Tuesday’s expo should never have been allowed to go ahead, claiming the convention brought together some of the world’s biggest weapons companies “which have carried out genocide in Gaza” and “a host of other war crimes”.

Mr Lees earlier accused NSW Police of “engaging in brutality against peaceful protesters” after Tuesday morning’s rally turned chaotic, with protesters trying to push through a metal barricade.

More than 30 officers, including from the Riot Squad and Mounted Police, moved in shortly after 7.30am to break up the crowd who were banging on barricades and chanting “war criminals not welcome here”.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122489

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23814328 (050809ZNOV25) Notable: Video: ASIO chief links Hizb ut-Tahrir and neo-Nazis, warns hostile nations could assassinate dissidents – ASIO Director-General Mike Burgess has likened Hizb ut-Tahrir’s tactics to those of neo-Nazis and warned that hostile regimes may attempt assassinations of dissidents in Australia. Delivering the Lowy Lecture in Sydney, he said the Islamist group’s anti-Israel rhetoric “fuels and normalises wider anti-Semitic narratives” and mirrors “provocative behaviour” by the National Socialist Network. Burgess revealed that three foreign nations are capable of “lethal targeting” in Australia, citing Iran’s direction of anti-Semitic arson attacks. He also said Russia was “covertly stoking division”, that anarchist extremists were increasingly violent, and that artificial intelligence is accelerating radicalisation, disinformation, and the erosion of social cohesion.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109469 (pb)

>>109584 (pb)

>>109470 (pb)

>>109486 (pb)

ASIO chief links Hizb ut-Tahrir and neo-Nazis, warns hostile nations could assassinate dissidents

GEOFF CHAMBERS - 4 November 2025

1/2

Spy chief Mike Burgess has likened tactics used by Islamic extremist group Hizb ut-Tahrir with neo-Nazis and warned of a ­realistic possibility that hostile ­regimes could replicate Iran’s ­direction of anti-Semitic attacks and “attempt to assassinate” dissidents in Australia.

Amid calls for the Albanese government to proscribe Hizb ut-Tahrir as a terrorist organisation, the Australian Security Intelligence Organisation director-­general on Tuesday night accused the group of using anti-Israel rhetoric to fuel and normalise “wider anti-Semitic narratives”.

Delivering the Lowy Lecture in Sydney on Tuesday night, Mr Burgess said the religiously motivated Hizb ut-Tahrir’s “provocative ­behaviour, offensive rhetoric and insidious strategy” was “very ­similar” to National Socialist Network tactics.

“The organisation’s condemnation of Israel and Jews attracts media attention and aids recruitment, but it deliberately stops short of promoting onshore acts of politically motivated violence,” Mr Burgess said.

“Hizb ut-Tahrir wants to test and stretch the boundaries of ­legality without breaking them. As with the neo-Nazis, this does not make its behaviour acceptable. I fear its anti-Israel rhetoric is fuelling and normalising wider anti-Semitic narratives.”

The Coalition has called on Labor to reconsider Hizb ut-Tahrir’s terror status. Britain, Germany, India and Indonesia are among a large group of countries that have banned the Islamic extremist group.

In a speech warning that community cohesion was under siege, Mr Burgess said “our social fabric is fraying – fraying in ways we have never experienced before”.

He said threats to social cohesion were categorised into three cohorts: ‘the aggrieved, the opportunistic and the cunning”. He is most concerned about “the cunning”: nation states “deliberately trying to set the (social) fabric alight and fan the flames”.

“Given the degrading trajectory of our security environment and the growing willingness of ­regimes to conduct high-harm ­operations, ASIO assesses there is a realistic possibility a foreign government will attempt to assassinate a perceived dissident in Australia,” he said.

“This threat is real. We believe there are at least three nations willing and capable of conducting lethal targeting here. It is entirely possible the regimes would try to hide their involvement by hiring criminal cut outs, as Iran did when directing its arson attacks.”

For the first time, the ASIO chief has called out far-left ­extremists and individuals who “are increasingly willing to ­embrace or threaten violence to achieve their goals”.

Following Hamas’s murderous attacks targeting innocent Israeli citizens on October 7, 2023, Mr Burgess said: “We’ve seen more provocative protests and a notable uptick in intentionally disruptive and damaging tactics by anti-­Israel activists, including multiple acts of arson, vandalism and violent protest against defence companies accused of supplying weapon components.

“While nationalist and racist ­violent extremists make up the significant majority of our investigations into ideologically motivated extremism, events in the Middle East triggered a troubling increase in anarchist and revolutionary extremism, which is also straining cohesion.”

Mr Burgess said that although the Middle East conflict “did not directly inspire terrorism here, it prompted protest, exacerbated tension, undermined social cohesion and elevated intolerance”.

“This, in turn, made acts of politically motivated violence more likely,” he said. “Even if the ceasefire holds, we expect ongoing tests for our social cohesion. Inflammatory rhetoric and provocative, disruptive actions have been normalised, and I fear the normalisation of violence and hatred against one community created a permissive environment for similar behaviours in other communities.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122490

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23814342 (050818ZNOV25) Notable: Video: Spy boss warns of ‘realistic possibility’ of foreign-ordered killings in Australia – ASIO Director-General Mike Burgess has warned there is a “realistic possibility” that foreign governments could attempt assassinations of dissidents in Australia. Speaking at the Lowy Institute in Sydney, he said the nation faces “unprecedented” threats to social cohesion driven by Russian trolls, neo-Nazis, Islamists and extreme anti-Israel activists. Burgess said three nations were “willing and capable of conducting lethal targeting”, referencing Iran’s past arson attacks on Jewish sites. He warned that authoritarian regimes are exploiting divisions through “state-sanctioned trolls”, while artificial intelligence could “take online radicalisation and disinformation to entirely new levels”. Burgess added that Hizb ut-Tahrir’s anti-Israel rhetoric mirrors neo-Nazi tactics and risks normalising antisemitic narratives in Australia’s polarised climate.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122489

Spy boss warns of ‘realistic possibility’ of foreign-ordered killings in Australia

Matthew Knott - November 4, 2025

1/2

The nation’s spy boss has issued a chilling warning about a growing risk of foreign governments trying to murder dissidents in Australia as he warns that social media algorithms and artificial intelligence are fuelling a disturbing rise in radicalisation.

In a sobering speech to the Lowy Institute think tank in Sydney, Australian Security Intelligence Organisation (ASIO) director-general Mike Burgess said the nation was facing an unprecedented number of simultaneous threats to social cohesion, including Russian trolls, neo-Nazis, Islamists and extreme anti-Israel activists.

Hours before Burgess’ speech, NSW Police arrested 13 anti-Israel protesters rallying outside a maritime conference and weapons expo in Sydney’s Darling Harbour, where two Israeli defence companies were exhibiting their equipment.

Declaring that community cohesion in Australia is “under siege, under threat, under attack”, Burgess said the nation’s social fabric is “fraying in ways we have never experienced before”.

“Australia has never faced so many different threats at scale at once,” he said.

Warning that intolerance is rising and anti-authority beliefs proliferating, Burgess said: “There are multiple, cascading and intersecting threats to our social cohesion, fuelled by three distinct but connected cohorts: the aggrieved, the opportunistic and the cunning.”

Burgess said that national security and law enforcement agencies were facing “a domestic security environment with an unprecedented number of challenges, and an unprecedented cumulative level of potential harm”.

ASIO has said since 2022 that foreign interference and espionage, rather than terrorism, is the nation’s principal national security threat.

“Given the degrading trajectory of our security environment and the growing willingness of regimes to conduct high-harm operations, ASIO assesses there is a realistic possibility a foreign government will attempt to assassinate a perceived dissident in Australia,” Burgess warned.

“This threat is real. We believe there are at least three nations willing and capable of conducting lethal targeting here.”

Burgess did not name the three countries, but said it was possible foreign governments would try to hide assassination attempts by using “criminal cut-outs” as Iran did in its arson attacks on a Jewish synagogue and a kosher deli in Melbourne and Sydney respectively.

“Regimes are operating in a security grey zone using non-traditional tools to interfere in decision-making, promote discord, amplify distrust and spread false narratives in Western democracies,” he said.

“Authoritarian regimes demonstrate a chilling willingness to exploit fault lines in countries they consider hostile.”

Burgess said that “state-sanctioned trolls” – especially from Russia – were trying to sow discord in Australia by attempting to “hijack and inflame legitimate debate”.

“We recently uncovered links between pro-Russian influencers in Australia and an offshore media organisation that almost certainly receives direction from Russian intelligence,” he said.

While the attempts so far have only gained limited traction, he said: “I am deeply concerned about the potential for AI to take online radicalisation and disinformation to entirely new levels.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122491

File: fd39ee8fc7c2ee2⋯.jpg (186.22 KB,1920x1080,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23814358 (050829ZNOV25) Notable: ASIO reveals foreign operations remit – ASIO Director-General Mike Burgess has confirmed that Australia’s domestic spy agency is now conducting operations offshore, with officers deployed to disrupt foreign intelligence activity. Speaking at the Lowy Institute, Burgess said ASIO “routinely conducts operations offshore” and now maintains offices in multiple countries. He revealed a recent sting in which ASIO officers intercepted foreign spies attempting to recruit Australians and issued a warning “that Australians were off limits”. Burgess also identified Russia as a growing espionage threat, citing arrests of two Russian-born citizens, and linked Iran to anti-Semitic attacks. He said hostile regimes are “unpicking our social fabric” and manipulating extremist narratives across the region to inflame division.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122489

>>122490

ASIO reveals foreign operations remit

Spy chief confirms his agency is operating offshore, exposing foreign spy tactics, and setting new lines in Australia’s counterintelligence work.

JULIAN BAJKOWSKI - NOV 5, 2025

1/2

Australia’s Director-General of Security, Mike Burgess, has publicly declared that the Australian Security Intelligence Organisation (ASIO) is now involved in offshore operations to defend Australia from foreign threats, revealing it has sent officers into the field to rebuff foreign cultivation attempts as part of its counterintelligence remit.

In a speech to the Lowy Institute on Tuesday night, Burgess outlined a series of persistently morphing threats to Australia’s national security, ranging from an ascendant local neo-Nazi movement to foreign intelligence service cultivation efforts directed at Australians. He also overtly spelled out that ASIO “officers routinely conduct operations offshore to defend Australia’s interests.”

The foreign counterintelligence activity by ASIO has long been an undeclared assumption, but Burgess’ statement delineates, to a degree, the difference between foreign counterintelligence operations compared to those of the collection activities of the Australian Secret Intelligence Service (which is part of the Department of Foreign Affairs).

“ASIO is sometimes called ‘Australia’s domestic spy agency’. This is not accurate. Our mission is to protect Australians from security threats wherever they are — at home and abroad,” Burgess said.

“We have offices in multiple countries and working relationships with literally hundreds of intelligence and security agencies — some you would expect, some you would find more surprising.”

Burgess cited “a recent example [that] involved a foreign intelligence service that keeps ASIO very busy, despite claiming it does not spy on Australia.

“One of its teams tried to cultivate and recruit several Australians, and believed it had convinced them to betray their country,” the ASIO chief said, adding that “reflecting ASIO’s success in making Australia an unwelcome environment for espionage, the foreign intelligence service arranged for an Australian to travel by plane and then boat to a third country for a face-to-face meeting.”

The meeting was successfully interdicted.

“The spies wanted to hand over a list of their intelligence requirements — the people and things they wanted spied on. Inside information on Australia’s economy, critical minerals, and AUKUS were high on the list. Little did they know ASIO was tracking and manipulating their entire activity,” Burgess said.

“We worked with a partner in the third country to deliver an unwelcome surprise. When the intelligence officers arrived at the location, they were not met by their target; they were met by an ASIO officer,” Burgess said.

“The conversation was brief but pointed. We told them Australians were off limits. We warned them we would disrupt their operations whenever and wherever we chose. And we sent our regards to the head of their service.”

Professional courtesy in tradecraft, it appears, is not altogether lost.

“Spies are meant to report any interaction with counterparts from another country. I’m pleased to note these intelligence officers followed the rules and owned up to their superiors that their cover and their operation were blown!” Burgess said.

The ASIO chief also called out Russia as a more ambitious intelligence aggressor.

“Putin’s invasion of Ukraine prompted a more aggressive and reckless Russian intelligence apparatus to target Ukraine’s supporters around the world, including Australia. Russia has always been a significant espionage threat — Ben Chifley founded ASIO to counter it — but the ongoing war with Ukraine added urgency to its intelligence gathering,” Burgess said.

“Last year, two Russian-born Australian citizens were arrested and charged with an espionage-related offence. Russia’s brazen acts of sabotage in Europe demonstrated its willingness to use a wider range of tools and tactics to coerce, intimidate and damage perceived adversaries, and we should not assume Australia is immune.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122492

File: 1a59e6aad1181f2⋯.jpg (393.4 KB,2000x1125,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: ccce990648183e0⋯.jpg (1.35 MB,3408x2272,3:2,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 98addf90ec6aa86⋯.jpg (945.14 KB,4096x2731,4096:2731,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23814376 (050838ZNOV25) Notable: ASIO spy boss takes aim at China, accusing Beijing of widespread intellectual property theft – ASIO Director-General Mike Burgess has accused China of “wholesale intellectual property theft” and political interference while warning that several nations are “willing and capable” of assassinations in Australia. Speaking at the Lowy Institute, Burgess said ASIO is confronting overlapping threats from China, Russia and Iran, and vowed to keep “calling out” the Chinese Communist Party for espionage and influence operations. He said Beijing’s officials “don’t understand” Australia’s system or ASIO’s independence, adding that Chinese complaints “won’t stop my resolve”. Burgess said intelligence cooperation with the United States remains “as strong as it’s ever been” under Donald Trump’s presidency.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122489

>>122490

>>122491

Mike Burgess: ASIO spy boss takes aim at China, accusing Beijing of widespread intellectual property theft

Andrew Greene - 5 November 2025

China has been accused of widespread intellectual property theft and political meddling by Australia’s spy chief who has also warned that several unnamed nations are “willing and capable” of carrying out assassinations here.

In a speech to the Lowy Institute, ASIO Director General Mike Burgess has detailed attempted foreign interference plots from Russia, but has also taken aim at Beijing and vowed to continue calling out Chinese Communist Party threats to Australian interests.

“We all spy on each other, but we don’t conduct wholesale intellectual property theft. We don’t actually interfere with political systems, and we don’t undertake high-harm activity,” Mr Burgess said when later asked about China.

Appearing in front of an audience at Sydney’s Town Hall on Tuesday night, Mr Burgess explained that when Beijing denies his accusations, it is displaying an ignorance of ASIO’s role in Australia.

“Every time I’ve done that (called China out), there’s an army of Chinese government officials that go around complaining to almost everyone in this country across the system — public and private — but not to me,” Mr Burgess said.

“If they were as smart as they should be — and they are smart — they would understand a Western liberal democracy and the role and the statutory standing of the security service. We work for the government of the day, but our security assessments and our security action are independent.

“They clearly don’t understand the system, because if they want to complain about ASIO doing its job and explaining the threats to the people we’re protecting, including calling out China when we need to, it won’t stop my resolve, it won’t stop my officers from doing the job and we’ll continue to call them out when I need to,” he added.

A senior government source familiar with ASIO operations has told The Nightly that it was “good to see Mr Burgess being open about this” and stressed the spy chief was right to point out it wasn’t just China interfering in Australia.

Relations between Australia and its largest trading partner deteriorated to new lows in 2020 over several issues, including Beijing’s anger at the then-Morrison government’s laws aimed at stamping out covert foreign interference in Australian politics.

Diplomatic and trade ties have improved since the Albanese government was elected in 2022, but security relations with Beijing remain strained as Australia increases cooperation with the United States to counter China’s rising influence in the Indo-Pacific.

Asked about Australia’s intelligence cooperation with the United States since Donald Trump’s return to power, Mr Burgess insisted it was “as strong as it’s ever been” and said he had a “strong relationship” with his counterpart, FBI Director Kash Patel.

“When it comes to protecting Australians, the Americans are great mates and they help us every day and we do our fair share of helping them as well. That’s the way it should be. I’ve seen no change to things since President (Donald) Trump was re-elected”.

During his prepared remarks to the Lowy Institute, Mr Burgess warned at least three countries are “willing and capable” to order assassination hits on Australian soil, possibly by using criminals for hire as Iran did to direct recent arson attacks here.

Citing the “degrading trajectory of our security environment”, ASIO has assessed there is now a “realistic possibility a foreign government will attempt to assassinate a perceived dissident in Australia.”

“This threat is real. We believe there are at least three nations willing and capable of conducting lethal targeting here. It is entirely possible the regimes would try to hide their involvement by hiring criminal cut-outs,” Mr Burgess warned.

https://thenightly.com.au/politics/mike-burgess-asio-spy-boss-takes-aim-at-china-accusing-beijing-of-widespread-intellectual-property-theft-c-20583211

https://x.com/LowyInstitute/status/1985879201191514485

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122493

File: d1a357c1bc3bd78⋯.jpg (109.14 KB,1200x720,5:3,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23814383 (050842ZNOV25) Notable: Australian spy chief accuses China of IP theft and meddling; experts say remarks reflect certain Australian officials’ attempt to mislead public"An Australian spy chief on Tuesday accused Chinese security services of widespread intellectual property theft and political meddling… Chinese experts criticized the series of statements, saying they reflect some Australia politicians' anxiety and bias toward China's technological and military progress. Mike Burgess… claimed that he would continue to call out China for harming Australian interests… Burgess claimed that China would understand ‘a Western liberal democracy and the role and the statutory standing of the security service. We work for the government of the day but our security assessments and our security action are independent,’ Australian spy chief claimed. Claiming that China's intelligence agencies are engaged in large-scale intellectual property theft and political interference… reveals the Australian spy chief's deep rooted sense of anxiety and unease, Yu Lei, chief research fellow at the Research Center for Pacific Island Countries of Liaocheng University in East China's Shandong Province, told the Global Times. As for Burgess's claim that China fails to understand how the Western mechanism operates, the accusation itself reveals both arrogance and ignorance, Chen Hong, director of New Zealand Studies Centre from East China Normal University, told the Global Times. Chen said the arrogance lies in the belief that the Western model of democracy is inherently superior and that China must learn from or conform to it. In reality, China has its own political system and model of social governance. As Australia's spy chief, Burgess made these remarks without offering any evidence - vague and misleading statements aimed not at protecting the public, but at shaping public perception, Chen said." – Zhao Yusha, The Global Times

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122489

>>122490

>>122491

>>122492

Australian spy chief accuses China of IP theft and meddling; experts say remarks reflect certain Australian officials’ attempt to mislead public

Zhao Yusha - Nov 05, 2025

An Australian spy chief on Tuesday accused Chinese security services of widespread intellectual property theft and political meddling and said China failed to understand how their Western counterparts operate. The remarks came on the heels of comments by Australia's Defense Minister Richard Marles, who hyped up China's "military build-up."

Chinese experts criticized the series of statements, saying they reflect some Australia politicians' anxiety and bias toward China's technological and military progress. Moreover, they said the spy chief's remarks reveal an arrogance rooted in the belief that Western political system is superior, while making such groundless accusations to mislead Australian public opinion.

Mike Burgess, director-general of the Australian Security Intelligence Organization, better known as ASIO, claimed that he would continue to call out China for harming Australian interests. Burgess made the claims at the Lowy Institute in Sydney, AP reported on Tuesday.

He also claimed that China displayed an ignorance of ASIO's role in Australia.

Burgess claimed that China would understand "a Western liberal democracy and the role and the statutory standing of the security service. We work for the government of the day but our security assessments and our security action are independent," Australian spy chief claimed.

Claiming that China's intelligence agencies are engaged in large-scale intellectual property theft and political interference is a cliché accusation and reveals the Australian spy chief's deep rooted sense of anxiety and unease - a reflection of his discomfort with China's rapid rise in technology and overall national strength, Yu Lei, chief research fellow at the Research Center for Pacific Island Countries of Liaocheng University in East China's Shandong Province, told the Global Times.

As for Burgess's claim that China fails to understand how the Western mechanism operates, the accusation itself reveals both arrogance and ignorance, Chen Hong, director of New Zealand Studies Centre from East China Normal University, told the Global Times.

Chen said the arrogance lies in the belief that the Western model of democracy is inherently superior and that China must learn from or conform to it. In reality, China has its own political system and model of social governance.

As Australia's spy chief, Burgess made these remarks without offering any evidence — vague and misleading statements aimed not at protecting the public, but at shaping public perception, Chen said.

Burgess also said he had a "strong relationship" with FBI Director Kash Patel. "When it comes to protecting Australians, the Americans are great mates and they help us every day and we do our fair share of helping them as well. That's the way it should be.

However, when asked to respond to accusations by US intelligence agencies that China had infiltrated parts of the US power grid and water systems and stolen American intellectual property and personal information, President Donald Trump told CBS News' 60 Minutes aired on Sunday, "We're a threat to them, too. Many of the things you say they do to us, we do to them."

Diplomatic and trade ties have improved since Australia's current government was first elected in 2022. But security relations remain fraught as Australia joined the US in efforts to counter China in the region, the AP claimed.

At almost the same time as Burgess made the remarks, Reuters reported on Tuesday that Australia's defense minister Richard Marles also claimed the work of Australia's defense force to protect its sea trade routes, including through the South China Sea, is becoming more risky as China undertakes the "biggest military build-up in the world today."

Although China-Australia relations appear to have "warmed" on the surface, the improvement remains largely confined to trade, with no substantive shift in Canberra's confrontational mindset in the political, military and security spheres, Yu said.

The recent Australian officials accusations, Yu noted, show some Australian officials' stance toward China continues to serve the preservation of American global hegemony.

https://www.globaltimes.cn/page/202511/1347412.shtml

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122494

File: d56a48a0ce9cba0⋯.jpg (144.64 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23814416 (050859ZNOV25) Notable: ASIO Director General Mike Burgess:How the aggrieved, opportunistic and cunning are ripping our social fabric- "Our social fabric is fraying — fraying in ways we have never experienced before… Grievance is growing, intolerance is rising, inflammatory rhetoric and behaviour is being normalised… There are multiple, cascading and intersecting threats to our social cohesion, fuelled by three distinct but connected cohorts: the aggrieved; the opportunistic; and the cunning. The aggrieved are the individuals who tear at our social fabric… The opportunistic are the organised groups that take advantage, including extremist organisations skilled at harnessing grievances… The biggest neo-Nazi group strategically exploited complaints about immigration and the cost of living… Events in the Middle East triggered a troubling increase in anarchist and revolutionary extremism… The cunning are the nation states deliberately trying to set the fabric alight, operating in a security grey zone to interfere, divide and distract… Authoritarian regimes demonstrate a chilling willingness to exploit fault lines… Given the degrading trajectory of our security environment… ASIO assesses there is a realistic possibility a foreign government will attempt to assassinate a perceived dissident in Australia." – Mike Burgess, Director-General of Security for the Australian Security Intelligence Organisation (ASIO), The Australian

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122489

>>122490

>>122491

>>122492

>>122493

COMMENTARY: How the aggrieved, opportunistic and cunning are ripping our social fabric

MIKE BURGESS - 4 November 2025

1/3

Our social fabric is fraying – fraying in ways we have never experienced before. This is not an accident. There have been other periods of social dislocation in Australia, but what we are seeing today is on a different scale, with different dynamics.

Grievance is growing. Intolerance is rising. Inflammatory rhetoric and behaviour is being normalised. Anti-authority beliefs are spreading. There are multiple, cascading and intersecting threats to our social cohesion, fuelled by three distinct but connected cohorts: the aggrieved; the opportunistic; and the cunning.

The aggrieved are the individuals who tear at our social fabric. The opportunistic are the organised groups that take advantage of weaknesses in our social fabric. The cunning are the nation states that play a longer, more calculated game to divide and distract us.

The aggrieved

Political differences, political debates and political protests are essential parts of a healthy democracy. Unfortunately, here and overseas, levels of personal grievance and frustration are growing. Rightly or wrongly some Australians feel dispossessed, disaffected, disenfranchised. There are spikes in polarisation and intolerance.

Trust in institutions is declining. Even truth itself is being undermined by conspiracy, mis- and disinformation. Similar trends are playing out across the Western world.

Angry, alienated individuals are embracing anti-authority ideologies and conspiracy theories; engaging in uncivil debate and unpeaceful protest.

Some are combining multiple beliefs to create new hybrid ideologies.

It is important to understand there is significant diversity in this cohort; suggesting all the aggrieved are “sovereign citizens”, for example, is neither accurate nor helpful.

While sovereign citizens consider the government illegitimate and therefore without authority, other aggrieved activists believe the opposite – the government possesses too much authority.

Many of the aggrieved do not necessarily espouse violent views, but may still see violence as a legitimate way to effect political or societal change.

The trend increased during Covid, gained further momentum after the terrorist attacks on Israel, and accelerated during Israel’s military response.

These dynamics raised the temperature of the security environment, made acts of violence more likely, and continue to undermine social cohesion.

The opportunistic

Extremist organisations – whether religiously or ideologically motivated – are adaptive and patient. They are skilled at exploiting gaps or fissures in social cohesion; at harnessing and harvesting grievances. The way nationalist and racist violent extremists attempted to leverage the so-called March for Australia rallies is a case in point.

The biggest neo-Nazi group, the National Socialist Network – or White Australia as it is rebranding itself – identified the demonstrations as a vehicle to raise its profile.

It strategically and opportunistically exploited the organisers’ complaints about immigration and the cost of living.

This is a key part of the Network’s broader strategy to “mainstream” and expand its movement by focussing on issues with broader appeal. Modern neo-Nazis crave attention and publicity. It gives them credibility and helps with recruitment.

They see journalists as “useful idiots” in this regard, and they celebrate even the most critical coverage because it inevitably leads to a surge in membership applications.

After one recent story, members joked about thanking the media for the “free promotion”.

At the same time, though, its ideology and its provocative, offensive and high-profile actions are antithetical to social cohesion.

Even if the organisation does not engage in terrorism, I remain deeply concerned by its hateful, divisive rhetoric and increasingly violent propaganda, and the growing likelihood these things will prompt spontaneous violence, particularly in response to perceived provocation.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122495

File: eedbf3df4cf0e7b⋯.jpg (1.3 MB,4588x3059,4588:3059,Clipboard.jpg)

File: e34f8ecfc76b699⋯.jpg (281.71 KB,2000x1334,1000:667,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23814436 (050910ZNOV25) Notable: Republicans lash out at Pentagon officials over treatment of Australia – Republican frustration with the Pentagon has intensified during a Senate Armed Services Committee hearing, with several senators accusing defence policy leaders of undermining President Donald Trump’s agenda and mishandling Australia’s interests. Senators Roger Wicker, Tom Cotton and Dan Sullivan criticised undersecretary Elbridge Colby’s policy unit for “slow-walking” Trump-backed initiatives, including AUKUS, a brief pause in Ukraine assistance and force reductions in Romania. They said the Pentagon’s review of AUKUS created doubt for Australia despite Trump declaring the pact “full steam ahead”. Austin Dahmer, nominated for a senior strategy role, defended the review but acknowledged ongoing concerns. The exchanges underscored bipartisan congressional support for AUKUS and frustration with internal Pentagon processes.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122417

>>122429

>>122449

Republicans lash out at Pentagon officials over treatment of Australia

Michael Koziol - November 5, 2025

1/2

Washington: Republican frustration with top personnel at the Pentagon has boiled over during a public hearing on Capitol Hill, with anger about the treatment of Australia and the AUKUS agreement a key part of the dispute.

Three Republicans on the powerful Senate Armed Services Committee voiced concerns about how the policy team inside the Pentagon, led by undersecretary of war Elbridge Colby, has appeared to deviate from President Donald Trump’s priorities on major matters concerning United States allies.

That included the AUKUS defence pact between Australia, the US and the United Kingdom, as well as a short-lived “pause” on US weapons assistance to Ukraine earlier this year and a recent drawdown of US troops stationed in NATO ally country, Romania.

The Pentagon launched a review of AUKUS in June and, in briefings to reporters, raised concerns about whether the agreement suited “America First” interests or was feasible. That included questions over whether the US was producing enough nuclear-powered submarines to sell them to Australia, and how Australia would use them in the event of a conflict with China.

But Trump strongly backed the deal when he met Prime Minister Anthony Albanese at the White House last month, dismissing concerns about feasibility and saying it was “full steam ahead”.

Senate committee chair Roger Wicker, a long-serving Republican from Mississippi, said at the hearing on Tuesday he was disappointed Trump’s decisions were “apparently slow-walked or reversed” by the Pentagon during the year.

“The AUKUS deal was cast into doubt despite the president’s strong support of the AUKUS agreement – much to the surprise and dismay of Australia, one of our most steadfast allies,” he said.

Wicker said the committee had enjoyed a relatively positive relationship with War Secretary Pete Hegseth and deputy secretary Steve Feinberg, but it had struggled to receive information from the policy office led by Colby, including about the Pentagon’s imminent National Defence Strategy review. “The situation needs to improve.”

Wicker’s comments were largely directed to Austin Dahmer, Colby’s acting deputy, whom Trump has nominated to become assistant secretary for strategy, plans and capabilities. Dahmer is one of Colby’s key allies at the Pentagon.

Dahmer was also grilled by Republican senator Tom Cotton of Arkansas, who complained the AUKUS review surprised Australia, the UK and Trump administration officials.

“It just seems like there’s this pig pen-like mess coming out of the policy shop that you don’t see from [other areas of the Pentagon],” Cotton said.

Dahmer said the AUKUS review was directed by Hegseth, and it was natural to examine the Biden-era initiative. However, he hinted that the Pentagon still had concerns.

Asked to confirm that the deal was now full steam ahead, as the president said, Dahmer said: “I would welcome the opportunity to brief you in a classified setting on the conclusions and recommendations of the review, but I think President Trump was absolutely clear that he supports AUKUS, and we’re moving forward.”

Wicker later queried that statement. “There’s nothing classified about the fact that we’re full steam ahead with AUKUS,” he said.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122496

File: 9556255addb34a5⋯.jpg (290.08 KB,Clipboard.jpg)

File: e1be89e5f504928⋯.jpg (521.69 KB,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23814460 (050925ZNOV25) Notable: AUKUS subs to receive US combat ‘brains’ – The AUKUS partnership has advanced with a new deal to install the US-designed AN/BYG-1 combat system on future Australian and British nuclear-powered submarines. BAE Systems will sign the agreement with General Dynamics Mission Systems, Raytheon Australia and Thales, ensuring the system - already used on Collins-class and US submarines - is integrated into the SSN-AUKUS boats built in Adelaide and the UK. Officials said the software will unify weapons and sensor controls and strengthen interoperability. Navy chief Admiral Mark Hammond said Australia is “well on track” to operate nuclear submarines, with Australian crews serving on Virginia-class boats. Defence Industry Minister Pat Conroy confirmed a $34m battery contract for PMB Defence and defended acquiring Israeli technology for the ADF.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122417

>>122429

>>122449

AUKUS subs to receive US combat ‘brains’

BEN PACKHAM - 5 November 2025

1/2

The trilateral AUKUS partnership has taken its biggest leap forward since the submarine agreement was struck with a new deal to install a US-designed combat system on Australia’s and Britain’s future nuclear boats.

A fortnight after US President Donald Trump declared “full steam ahead” on the submarine program, the lead shipbuilder for the AUKUS-class subs has sealed a deal with three key partners to deliver the brains of the boats.

The agreement will see the AN/BYG-1 combat system – used on Australia’s Collins-class sub­marines and US nuclear-­powered submarines – incorporated into the design for the nuclear-­powered boats to be built in Adelaide and Britain.

The British-owned shipbuilder BAE Systems will sign the deal on Wednesday morning at the Indo-Pacific Maritime Expo in Sydney with the combat system designer, General Dynamics Mission Systems, together with Raytheon Australia and French-owned company Thales.

The advanced software system will integrate the boats’ weapons and sensor controls, and typically accounts for about 20 per cent of a submarine’s costs.

The agreement will ensure commonality between the future Australian and British systems, and requires the UK to switch from using its own combat system.

BAE Systems Australia chief executive Craig Lockhart said the deal was a major strategic milestone, ensuring the SSN-AUKUS submarines would receive “the most effective and advanced combat system” available.

He said it would “accelerate and enhance combat system development that is interoperable by design”, delivering a world-class submarine for both countries.

Raytheon Australia will integrate the system into the SSN-AUKUS boats while Thales will deliver the subs’ advanced sonar array.

General Dynamics Mission Systems vice-president Laura Hooks said the companies would be “entrusted to sustain and integrate combat systems aboard Virginia and AUKUS submarines in the future, ensuring continuity, confidence and low-risk delivery”.

The deal comes after the Chief of Navy, Admiral Mark Hammond, declared Australia was “well on track” to obtaining and operating nuclear-powered submarines, initially with the purchase of three US Virginia-class submarines.

“Many of our submariners are now passed through the US Navy’s Nuclear Propulsion sources, and are growing their professional mastery on board Virginia-class submarines,” he told the Sea Power Conference, on the sidelines of the Indo-Pacific expo.

“In fact, every US Navy nuclear submarine operating out of Pearl Harbor by the end of this year will have Australian submariners on board.”

He said Australian personnel were also undertaking maintenance of the USS Vermont ­Virginia-class submarine in Western Australia in a major milestone for the AUKUS program.

“We’ve got command of the submarine. It’s not just historic for us. It’s historic for them,” Admiral Hammond said. “We are building an ecosystem here that can assure the availability, readiness and leth­ality of nuclear-powered sub­marines from Australia.

“That’s to the benefit of the US Navy, that’s to the benefit of the Australian navy, and it will enable us to build that level of competency to assume custody of a nuclear submarine in a few years’ time.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122497

File: 0c6a97d28e4f31d⋯.jpg (2.38 MB,5000x3750,4:3,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 3d4f457e9e7b1e5⋯.jpg (1.37 MB,5000x3333,5000:3333,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23814477 (050936ZNOV25) Notable: Reddit and Kick added to child social media ban – Australia’s upcoming ban on social media accounts for children under 16 will now include Reddit and live-streaming platform Kick, the government has confirmed. Communications Minister Anika Wells said the platforms join TikTok, Snapchat, YouTube, X, Facebook, Instagram and Threads as age-restricted from December 10 after eSafety ruled their primary purpose is online social interaction. Platforms must take “reasonable steps” to block under-16s or face fines up to $49.5 million. Tech firms say late guidance has made preparation difficult, but TikTok, Meta and Snap told a Senate hearing they will begin blocking underage users. Wells said there is “no excuse for failure”, adding that predatory algorithms should not “manipulate Australian children”.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122249

>>122304

>>122364

>>122375

>>122485

Reddit and Kick added to child social media ban

Clare Armstrong - 5 November 2025

Australia's world-first social media ban for children under 16 will apply to messaging board Reddit and live-streaming platform Kick, the online safety regulator has ruled.

Communications Minister Anika Wells on Wednesday confirmed the two platforms are joining Snapchat, TikTok, YouTube, X, Facebook and Instagram, which includes Threads, as "age-restricted" from December 10.

The eSafety Commission has declared the nine services, including now Reddit and Kick, currently meet the criteria for being included in the ban, specifically that their "sole or significant purpose is to enable online social interaction". Threads, a platform which requires an Instagram account to access, is the ninth.

Ms Wells said she had met with the major social media platforms in the past month so they understood there was "no excuse for failure" in implementing the ban.

"eSafety has assessed eight platforms as requiring age-restriction but their assessments will be ongoing and this list is dynamic," she said.

"We aren't chasing perfection, we are chasing a meaningful difference."

Kick is an Australian competitor to video live streaming platform Twitch, with a reported average viewership of about 258,000, while forum-based platform Reddit is the seventh-most visited site in the world.

In the last few months platforms like Reddit received advice from eSafety they could be captured in the ban, and were given an opportunity to make submissions about why they should not be included.

A final decision was then made based on this information.

From December 10 any platform that fails to take reasonable steps to keep Australians under the age of 16 from holding an account will face fines of up to $49.5 million.

Several tech giants have argued the government's slow release of information and guidance so close to the December 10 start date has hampered their ability to prepare to implement restrictions.

But at a Senate hearing last week officials representing TikTok, Meta and Snap all confirmed they would begin blocking young teenagers from their platforms when the new laws take effect.

Snap global policy senior vice-president Jennifer Stout said Australia was a "first mover" on the ban and as a result the company was "learning as we go".

"We're doing the best we can to comply," she said.

Snapchat is looking to implement a tool so underage users can download and archive their data before their accounts are disabled and locked.

TikTok is exploring options such as giving young people the ability to deactivate or place an account in suspension, while Meta is looking to provide similar options to users on Instagram and Facebook.

Ms Wells said there was a "time and place for social media in Australia", but there was no space for "predatory algorithms, harmful content and toxic popularity metres manipulating Australian children".

"Online platforms can target children with chilling control," she said.

"We are mandating they use that sophisticated technology to protect them."

eSafety Commissioner Julie Inman Grant said delaying children's access to social media accounts gave them "valuable time to learn and grow" without the "powerful, unseen forces of opaque algorithms and endless scroll".

She encouraged parents to visit the eSafety website for resources explaining the ban, including the opportunity to attend a live webinar where people could ask questions to the regulator.

Platforms not required with the new age limit from next month must be captured in one of the exempt classes including messaging, email, voice or video calling, online games, health, education, professional development or services that enable information about products or services.

This means popular gaming platforms like Roblox and messaging apps like Meta-owned WhatsApp or Messenger are not captured by the new laws.

Ms Inman-Grant said negotiations with Roblox had been asked to take other steps, including preventing adult users from contacting child users without parental consent. "We're using other tools in our arsenal to keep these other platforms safer," she said.

She also said the agency was in contact with platforms which did not meet the criteria currently, but which could see an influx of young users trying to circumvent the ban, including Yubo and Bluesky.

"This is a dynamic list and will always change... some of the companies when we made this assessment I will say were very much on the line."

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-11-04/reddit-and-kick-added-to-child-social-media-ban/105971750

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122498

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23819492 (060832ZNOV25) Notable: Video: Improvised explosive devices seized in counterterrorism raid – Seven people have been charged after Queensland counterterrorism raids uncovered 20 kilograms of commercial explosives and multiple improvised explosive devices. The arrests follow Operation Whiskey Blackheart, formed in late 2024 to investigate illegal firearms and explosives trafficking. Assistant commissioner Charysse Pond said the raids showed police were “committed to keeping the community safe”, crediting the Counter-Terrorism Investigation Group. In a separate Far North Queensland operation, five people were charged after police and the Australian Border Force allegedly found unlawful firearms, flick knives, a taser, cannabis and other contraband at properties in Ravenshoe and Speewah.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122489

>>122490

>>122494

Improvised explosive devices seized in counterterrorism raid

Dominique Tassell - November 5, 2025

Police have charged seven people following a major counterterrorism operation in Queensland, with multiple raids allegedly uncovering 20 kilograms of commercial explosives and a number of improvised explosive devices (IEDs).

The raids were carried out earlier this year, following the formation of Operation Whiskey Blackheart in October 2024.

Four men and three women have been charged with drug, weapons and explosives offences, and are currently before courts in Brisbane, Proserpine, Beaudesert and Bowen.

Police were investigating the alleged trafficking of illegal firearms and explosives, said assistant commissioner Charysse Pond of the Security, Counter-Terrorism and Forensic Services Command.

“These arrests demonstrate the Queensland Police Service’s statewide commitment to keeping the community safe and [confident] that law enforcement is pursuing illegal activity,” Pond said.

“The work undertaken is a credit to the Counter-Terrorism Investigation Group.

“The QPS is working with our partner agencies in relation to this evolving technology and working together to keep our community safe.”

In a separate operation targeting crime in Far North Queensland, five people were charged with 16 drug and firearm offences.

Australian Border Force (ABF) assisted with the execution of search warrants at properties in Ravenshoe and Speewah on October 15.

It will be alleged police located flick knives, a taser, cannabis, drug utensils, capsicum spray, a laser pointer, and airsoft firearms including handguns, a pistol and rifle at the Ravenshoe address.

A 19-year-old man, 29-year-old man and 49-year-old woman from Ravenshoe have been charged. A 19-year-old New South Wales man was also charged. All four were issued adult cautions.

Police allegedly located several unlawful firearms and firearm parts at the Speewah property.

It will be alleged a 42-year-old Speewah man was involved in manufacturing illegal firearms.

A 42-year-old Speewah man is now facing nine charges, and is due to appear in the Cairns Magistrates Court on November 24.

https://www.theage.com.au/national/queensland/improvised-explosive-devices-among-items-seized-in-qld-counterterrorism-raid-20251105-p5n7xo.html

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m9GbKOQjh-A

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122499

File: ddf5dabfc2b26a7⋯.jpg (1.59 MB,4096x2304,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 2f05902f7ce660e⋯.jpg (1.67 MB,4096x2731,4096:2731,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23819495 (060839ZNOV25) Notable: USS Vermont arrives in WA for maintenance – USS Vermont, a US Virginia-class submarine, has arrived at HMAS Stirling for a major Submarine Maintenance Period, marking another step in Australia’s plan to operate and sustain nuclear-powered submarines. Thirteen Royal Australian Navy personnel are embedded in the 134-strong crew after extensive US training. This year’s program is larger and more complex than the 2024 effort, with Australian teams taking greater responsibility ahead of Submarine Rotational Force - West in 2027. ASC (the Australian Submarine Corporation), US shipyard staff and international trainees are supporting the work, which officials say strengthens nuclear stewardship and deepens AUKUS cooperation. Vice Admiral Jonathan Mead, Director-General of the Australian Submarine Agency, said the visit “strengthens our ability to operate and sustain nuclear-powered submarines in Australia,” underscoring rising sovereign capability.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122417

>>122429

>>122449

>>122496

USS Vermont arrives in WA for maintenance

navalinstitute.com.au - November 1, 2025

1/2

USS Vermont (SSN 792), a US Virginia class submarine, arrived at HMAS Stirling on 29 October 2025 for the Submarine Maintenance Period (SMP), the Australian Department of Defence announced. It marks another significant leap in Australia’s journey to acquire a sovereign capability to operate and maintain conventionally-armed, nuclear-powered submarines from HMAS Stirling.

Together with our AUKUS partners, Australia has the responsibility for coordinating, supporting and delivering a significant package of maintenance work on USS Vermont.

USS Vermont includes 13 Royal Australian Navy personnel in the crew of 134. These are from the cohort of officers and sailors that have completed the rigorous training in the US.

The SMP builds on last year’s milestone, when Australian personnel participated in the first-ever maintenance of a US conventionally-armed, nuclear-powered submarine on home soil during the 2024 Submarine Tendered Maintenance Period.

This year’s SMP involves a larger and more complex package of work that more closely reflects the type of maintenance that will be required when Submarine Rotational Force – West begins operations at HMAS Stirling in 2027.

Unlike the previous maintenance period, this year’s work is being carried out without a tender ship – meaning Australian personnel are taking on even greater responsibility for executing complex maintenance activities on site. This will be a significant achievement and a reflection of the progress in upskilling the Australian workforce.

During this maintenance period, ASC will have an active role supporting work streams, including the provision and operation of pier temporary services and other support services like scaffolding.

Working alongside US personnel from Pearl Harbor Naval Shipyard and Intermediate Maintenance Facility (PHNSY & IMF), 19 ASC International Military Students and a further two from Raytheon and Thales are currently being trained at PHNSY & IMF.

They have returned to Australia for the SMP to help deliver the majority of the maintenance effort. This will contribute to sovereign technical uplift and facilitating knowledge transfer in line with an agreed phased capability plan leading up to the 2027 Initial Operational Support (IOS) milestone with the commencement of Submarine Rotational Force – West.

To further assist with the SMP, 22 Royal Australian Navy Fleet Support Unit personnel have also been training at the Pearl Harbor Navy Shipyard since June 2025, along with eight Royal Australian Navy clearance divers who will work alongside PHNSY Divers throughout the SMP.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122500

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23828037 (080705ZNOV25) Notable: Video: Left-wing protest group planned brick attacks on police before CBD unrest – Victoria Police are investigating evidence that extreme left-wing group Campaign Against Racism and Fascism planned violent actions weeks before clashes in Melbourne’s CBD, including explicit instructions to throw bricks at officers. Images from an October 3 University of Melbourne forum show attendees urged to “be militant,” “be aggressive,” and “make them be ashamed to walk the streets,” with one slide depicting brick-throwing. CARF denies advocating violence and blames an overseas guest speaker. On October 19, riot police were hit with rocks, glass-filled bottles, burning bins and other projectiles, with senior officers calling the assault coordinated. The university has launched a review, condemning any incitement. Politicians criticised the institution for hosting the event, while the Police Association renewed demands for a protest-permit system to help separate hostile groups.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122398

>>122399

>>122401

Left-wing protest group planned brick attacks on police before chaos erupted in CBD

Extreme left-wing protesters planned a violent attack on police, including throwing bricks at them, at a meeting held at the prestigious University of Melbourne weeks before chaos erupted in Melbourne’s CBD.

Shannon Deery - November 7, 2025

1/2

Extreme left-wing protesters planned a violent attack on police – including throwing bricks at them – weeks before chaos erupted in Melbourne’s CBD last month.

The Herald Sun can reveal Campaign Against Racism and Fascism (CARF) held a meeting at the prestigious University of Melbourne where attendees were urged to launch missiles at officers.

The shocking instructions at the October 3 forum were captured on images obtained by the Herald Sun, which are now being investigated by Victoria Police.

Protesters were told to “be militant in your ideology” and “be aggressive to the fascists”.

“Make them be ashamed to walk the streets,” one slide said.

The same slide suggested throwing bricks at police.

On October 19, riot police were set upon and attacked as they worked to control protesters who tried to confront an anti-immigration rally by the ultraconservative March for Australia group.

Victoria Police North West Metro region Commander Wayne Chessman emptied a box of rocks thrown at police at a press conference after the protest.

“This is what was thrown at police today and I think Melbourne has had a gutful,” he said.

“The left-wing group were running up and down side-streets. We were lucky we had barriers and police in place …”

“Bottles filled with shards of glass were being thrown at police. Rotten fruit, bins and flags were set on fire.

“People came to pick a fight with the police,” the frustrated officer, who has been in the force for 39-years, added.

A CARF spokesperson said the October 3 presentation was part of a talk given by an international speaker from the UK who was not a member of the group.

“None of our members, our social media posts, or leaflets has ever advocated for violence,” they said.

“There is no evidence that any members of CARF were involved in any of the conflicts (that) Sunday.

“CARF has always argued that the best way to challenge the growth of fascism is to build a mass movement opposed to racism.”

The spokesperson said the organisation could not “possibly control everyone who turns up to demonstrations” but condemned police tactics on the day.

“We’re appalled by the police use of chemical weapons, rubber coated steel bullets and sound grenades, which hospitalised at least five protesters,” they said.

“There should be no place for these lethal weapons on the streets of Melbourne.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122501

File: 5941a4062cdde76⋯.jpg (1.92 MB,6250x4167,6250:4167,Clipboard.jpg)

File: e24470a32f6a4fd⋯.jpg (2.3 MB,5495x3664,5495:3664,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23828055 (080717ZNOV25) Notable: Pentagon backs AUKUS amid criticism its review has upset Australia – The Pentagon says its long-running review of the AUKUS pact is in its final stages and now agrees the agreement delivers “significant benefit” for US strategy in the Indo-Pacific. Senior adviser Alexander Velez-Green told a Senate hearing the review provided new insight into submarine production capacity and confirmed the pact aligns with Donald Trump’s priorities. Republican senators again criticised the secrecy of the process, saying it had unsettled Australia and cast doubt on US commitment. Pentagon concerns had focused on how Australia would use nuclear-powered submarines in a potential conflict with China. Officials now say AUKUS remains “in our interest”, as Australia prepares another $US1 billion payment to bolster the US industrial base. Experts argue the pact is too strategically important to fail.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122417

>>122429

>>122496

>>122499

>>>/qresearch/23819520

Pentagon backs AUKUS amid criticism its review has ‘upset Australia’

Michael Koziol - November 7, 2025

Washington: The Pentagon says its review of the AUKUS pact with Australia is in its final stages, but it now agrees the agreement will bring “significant benefit” for US strategic interests in the Indo-Pacific.

Confirmation that the War Department’s policy unit supports the deal came in a congressional hearing where Republican senators once again expressed frustrations about the secrecy surrounding the AUKUS review, and other defence matters concerning United States allies.

Alexander Velez-Green, the senior adviser to war undersecretary Elbridge Colby, said the review was “in its final stages” and had been a useful exercise in trying to make the AUKUS agreement successful, in line with President Donald Trump’s priorities.

“Part of that was taking into account the submarine industrial base, production timelines, capacity issues ... [which] continue to be a challenge,” Velez-Green told the Senate on Thursday (Friday AEDT).

“We did get, I think, additional insight into the state of things and where we are going on the production issue, on other aspects … all with the goal of making this as strong and enduring as possible.

“It is our view – consistent with what the president said with Prime Minister [Anthony] Albanese recently – that it is in our interest for this to work. We do gain significant benefit from it.”

Those remarks represent the strongest public endorsement of AUKUS to date from officials inside the Pentagon team that conducted the review.

Colby and Velez-Green have been leading the inquiry, and Pentagon officials raised numerous concerns about how Australia would position and use the nuclear-powered submarines it acquired under AUKUS, especially in the event of a conflict with China.

Trump said the deal was “full steam ahead” when he met with Albanese last month, although Navy Secretary John Phelan said some “ambiguity” remained about parts of the deal, and Albanese later acknowledged there would be changes but would not say what they were.

Australia is due to pay another $US1 billion ($1.5 billion) towards the US submarine industrial base before the end of this year to improve the production rate, which has lagged at about 1.2 boats a year. Experts say it must increase to about two boats a year for the US to be in a position to fulfil its AUKUS commitments.

Australia’s first submarine chief, Vice Admiral Jonathan Mead, has announced he will retire from the Australian Submarine Agency in the middle of 2026, meaning the Albanese government must appoint a new commander to the high-stakes job before the first US nuclear-powered submarine is due to be dispatched to Western Australia some time in 2027.

Velez-Green, who has been nominated to be Colby’s deputy, was being questioned by Mississippi Republican senator Roger Wicker, the chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee, who complained that he was not consulted about the lengthy AUKUS review, “which upset out friends in Australia and cast doubt on whether we were committed to this agreement”.

The hearing came two days after Wicker and other Republican senators vented frustration with the Pentagon policy unit over decisions on AUKUS, and other matters, which they said were at odds with Trump’s priorities.

However, others defended Colby and the Pentagon policy team from “anonymous and misleading” criticism. Missouri Republican senator Eric Schmitt said the resistance to Colby was coming from people invested in “maintaining a foreign policy status quo that has repeatedly failed the American people”.

Evan Montgomery, the vice president of research and studies at the Centre for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments, said he was confident the nuclear-powered submarines would be delivered because the pact was so important for the broader strategic alliance between the US and Australia.

“It’s hard for me to imagine a situation in which the US does not actually provide those Virginia-Class [boats] to Australia roughly on the timeline we are expecting,” he said after an event at the Cato Institute in Washington about defending Taiwan. “It would be so disruptive to all these other co-operative endeavours that are underway for AUKUS to falter.”

Montgomery said even if Australia was reluctant to use the nuclear-powered submarines in the early stages of a conflict in the Taiwan Strait or South China Sea, having that capability “may give Australia more confidence to lean in early and forcefully on the side of the United States in ways that may be just as valuable, or more valuable, in the early stages of a conflict”.

https://www.theage.com.au/world/north-america/pentagon-backs-aukus-amid-criticism-its-review-has-upset-australia-20251107-p5n8f4.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122502

File: 72714d072abf8ad⋯.mp4 (6.25 MB,960x540,16:9,Clipboard.mp4)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23828077 (080735ZNOV25) Notable: Video: Police blunder allows neo-Nazi anti Jewish lobby rally outside NSW Parliament – A police-approved neo-Nazi rally outside the NSW parliament has drawn outrage from Jewish leaders and politicians, after extremist activists from the National Socialist Network staged a seven minute protest targeting the “Jewish lobby.” Footage showed members dressed in black chanting anti Jewish conspiracy lines and displaying a banner reading “Abolish the Jewish Lobby.” NSW Police Commissioner Mal Lanyon admitted a “breakdown in communication” after officers approved a Form 1 request without briefing the government. Premier Chris Minns condemned the protesters as “pissants” and said the rally should never have occurred. Jewish community leaders warned unchecked hate risks becoming normalised, urging stronger laws and tools to combat extremism and protect social cohesion. Police are investigating potential offences.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122150

>>122234

>>122489

>>122494

Police blunder allows neo-Nazi ‘anti-Jewish lobby’ rally outside NSW Parliament

MOHAMMAD ALFARES - 8 November 2025

1/2

Australia’s Jewish leaders have lashed a police-approved neo-Nazi rally outside the NSW parliament as a shameful act of hate, warning that unchecked “evil” will become normalised.

A large group of extremist neo-Nazi activists have protested against the “influence of the Jewish lobby” on Australian politics in a rally on Saturday morning, in a move blasted as “despicable” by Premier Chris Minns.

Shocking footage has emerged of National Social Network members, all dressed in black, with a large banner that states “Abolish the Jewish Lobby” in a protest that was approved by police during a “breakdown in communication”.

The extremist group could be heard saying: “The Jewish lobby is one of the most powerful lobbies in Australia. They bribe our politicians, they coerce our politicians.”

A Hitler slogan was also chanted by the group at the end of the speech.

The protest reportedly lasted around seven minutes after police gave it the green light – with both the NSW Police Commissioner and Premier unaware it was taking place.

Commissioner Mal Lanyon said there had been a “break down in communication” and the government had not been briefed on the protest despite police approving a Form 1 application from the White Australia group which was received on October 28.

“They indicated that approximately 50 people would be attending that protest,” he said during a press conference.

“The purpose for conducting the protest was said to be the protest against the Jewish lobby groups but also the current hate speech laws.

“The government had not been briefed on this process. I take it very personally, there was a communication error in the police force for which I did not personally know that today’s protest was taking place.

“Accordingly, I had not briefed the Minister of Police.”

Mr Minns called the protesters “pissants” and said it was “of course, concerning” that the rally was approved to go ahead.

“If we had our time again, that rally wouldn’t have taken place,” Mr Minns said.

“It’s obviously shameful that these people feel that they have the right to demonstrate it’s such a despicable way, spewing division and racism on the streets of Sydney.

“We need to send a clear and unambiguous message that kind of behaviour will not be tolerated and the truth of the matter is if you give these racists an inch, they’re going to take a mile.”

The premier promised a review of the protest and teased the possibility of new laws, but failed to answer why existing laws against incitement of racial hatred had not stopped the event.

“We have been locked in discussions most of the day with the senior lawyers inside the government,” Mr Minns said.

“They believe that there is room to move in relation to protecting public harmony further than what we’ve currently constituted.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122503

File: 5966adafe7156d2⋯.jpg (137.41 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 48fa1c5a3542334⋯.jpg (131.51 KB,912x1216,3:4,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 8c0713e931fee1a⋯.jpg (461.68 KB,2048x2731,2048:2731,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 4edf20a75af117e⋯.jpg (203.17 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23831522 (090805ZNOV25) Notable: Hizb ut Tahrir’s Sydney conference sparks terror listing pressure – Hizb ut Tahrir, an Islamist political movement that rejects democracy and advocates the establishment of a transnational caliphate, plans to hold a national conference in Bankstown on November 23, triggering warnings from the Minns government that “hate speech has no place in NSW” and intensified pressure to list the group as a terror organisation. The event follows ASIO chief Mike Burgess’ accusation that Hizb ut Tahrir’s “provocative behaviour, offensive rhetoric and insidious strategy” mirror neo Nazi tactics. Federal and NSW opposition figures say the conference risks inflaming tensions, urging the Albanese government to intervene. Jewish community leaders expressed alarm that the group can openly advertise such a gathering, calling it a sign of growing extremist confidence in Australia.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122489

>>122494

Hizb ut-Tahrir’s Sydney conference sparks terror listing pressure

Security chiefs and political leaders have united to condemn a planned Sydney conference by Hizb ut-Tahrir, which was recently banned in Britain as a terror group.

Derrick Krusche - November 9, 2025

Islamic fundamentalist organisation Hizb ut-Tahrir, which the Albanese government is under pressure to list as a terror group, is planning to host a national conference in Sydney this month, sparking a warning from the Minns state government that “hate speech has no place in NSW”.

The event, to be held at The Highline Venue function centre in Bankstown on November 23, is being promoted with messages such as “Islam – the change the world desperately needs” and “Gaza has exposed the moral decay of the global order, the world now stands at a breaking point, demanding a new system rooted in justice”.

It comes just days after ASIO director-general Mike Burgess singled out Hizb ut-Tahrir in a speech, likening its tactics in Australia with neo-Nazis, and blasting what he says is its “provocative behaviour, offensive rhetoric and insidious strategy”.

Last year, the UK banned Hizb ut-Tahrir as a terror group after its supporters allegedly chanted “jihad” at a rally.

The British government said the group “actively promoted and encouraged terrorism”, and described the killing of Jewish tourists as an “example of what should be done towards Jews”.

At a rally linked to the group in Bankstown last month, sheik Ibrahim Dadoun said: “You here today are thorns in the throat of Zionist sympathisers”.

A spokeswoman for Premier Chris Minns’s government said authorities would act if there was any promotion of violence at the event. “Hate speech has no place in NSW – it is unacceptable, it is unlawful and it will be met with the full force of the law,” she said.

Federal Opposition home affairs spokesman Jonno Duniam, who wants Hizb ut-Tahrir to be listed as a terror group, said the conference would divide people.

“Hizb ut-Tahrir is an anti-Semitic organisation that promotes and encourages terrorism.

“This conference will no doubt encourage even more division and hatred that we have seen spiral out of control under the Albanese Labor government,” Mr Duniam said.

NSW Opposition leader Mark Speakman backed in Mr Burgess’s words.

“If our intelligence chief is warning that Hizb ut-Tahrir behave like neo-Nazis, then governments need to intervene to stop NSW and Australia being platforms for hate,” he said.

“This is a matter for leadership, not hesitation.”

State opposition police and counter terrorism spokesman Paul Toole said the conference should not be going ahead.

“Hizb-Tahrir has a long history of pushing extremist views that not only divide our communities but also undermine social cohesion,” he said.

“At a time when tensions are already high, the last thing we need is a platform for this provocative and inflammatory rhetoric.

“The Albanese government should step in right now, stop turning a blind eye to this, grow a spine and stop this event from taking place before more harm is done. Australians are fed up with this behaviour and deserve a government that takes this seriously.”

NSW Liberal MP Mark Coure said: “Letting Hizb ut-Tahrir gather under the banner of extremism sends the wrong message to families who just want peace, safety and a future for their kids.”

Australian Jewish Association chief executive Robert Gregory said he was worried.

“The fact that Hizb ut-Tahrir feels comfortable openly advertising and holding a major conference in Western Sydney should concern all Australians – what kind of venue would agree to host such an event, and who would choose to attend?”

https://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/news/nsw/hizb-uttahrirs-sydney-conference-sparks-terror-listing-pressure/news-story/86225c60f0d9dfa3d7363297b89f7803

https://qresear.ch/?q=Hizb+ut-Tahrir

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122504

File: 652dbaf197c8510⋯.jpg (294.99 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 15a1e7f0ac176bb⋯.jpg (169.2 KB,1280x720,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: f9d11e3411a17bf⋯.jpg (49.17 KB,1023x768,341:256,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23835051 (100802ZNOV25) Notable: Plans for army’s 7bn infantry fighting vehicles exposed in Iran linked cyber attack – Pro Hamas hacking group Cyber Toufan, widely suspected of being an Iranian state proxy, has stolen classified plans for Australia’s 7bn Redback infantry fighting vehicles in a mass breach of Israeli defence companies. Posted online were 3D renderings and technical data for Elbit Systems’ weapons turrets – including Australian designed EOS components – after the hackers infiltrated supply chain firm MAYA Technologies and spent more than a year recording internal systems. The leak also exposed details of Elbit’s helmet display and the Spike NLOS missile under ADF consideration. CyberCX warned the incident highlights escalating global cyber risks to AUKUS era projects. Defence and Hanwha declined comment as ASD and ASIO continue warning that foreign services are actively targeting Australia’s key military programs.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109470 (pb)

>>122489

>>122494

Plans for army’s $7bn infantry fighting vehicles exposed in Iran-linked cyber attack

BEN PACKHAM - 9 November 2025

1/2

Classified plans for Australia’s new $7bn infantry fighting vehicles have been stolen by pro-Hamas hackers in a massive cyber attack on Israeli arms companies.

The Cyber Toufan hacking group – believed to be linked to the Iranian state – posted 3D renderings and technical details of the army’s next-generation Redback vehicle, which will be fitted with hi-tech weapons turrets supplied by Israel’s Elbit Systems.

The group claims to have obtained confidential data from 17 Israeli defence companies after gaining entry to supply chain firm MAYA Technologies through its security cameras more than a year ago.

It started publishing confidential details of 36 Israeli military projects on its Telegram social media channel on October 22, declaring it had “infiltrated the heart of Israel’s defence engineering operations”.

The Elbit turrets incorporate advanced sensors and remote weapons systems designed by Australian defence company EOS, as well as its own 30mm cannon and Iron Fist protection system.

The data breach also exposed plans for an Elbit helmet-mounted display system similar to one used on the Redback, as well as the Spike NLOS anti-tank missile being considered for purchase by the Australian Defence Force.

It’s unclear how much information was stolen and whether it could be used to develop countermeasures for the Redback’s weapons and defensive technology.

There are also concerns Israel’s world-leading military capabilities could be reverse-engineered from the stolen data.

The Australian Army will get 127 of the tank-like Redback vehicles, designed by South Korea’s Hanwha Defence, for about $7bn. The Elbit turrets will be supplied under a contract worth about $920m.

The breach underscores the threat to Australia’s most critical military projects, including the AUKUS submarine program, from cyber attacks on supply chain companies.

In an unverified claim, Cyber Toufan said it had compromised Elbit’s systems and those of fellow Israeli defence giant Rafael following the initial MAYA breach.

“Through the systems, we have breached Elbit and Rafael’s through then (sic). Their phones, printers, routers and cameras as well,” the group said.

“We have recorded your meetings with sound and video for over a year. This is just the beginning with Maya!”

Leading Australian cybersecurity firm CyberCX said the incident was still evolving.

“We don’t yet know the impact – if any – to ADF platforms,” CyberCX executive director of cyber intelligence Katherine Mansted said.

“However, this would not be the first time that we have seen Iran-backed hacking groups compromise Israeli companies, causing harm to their customers in Australia.

“This is part of a broader trend. Conflicts in geographically distant parts of the world – from Russia-Ukraine to the Middle East – are amping up cyber threats to Australian organisations. Countries involved in these conflicts, notably Russia and Iran, are largely indifferent to cyber collateral damage.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122505

File: ab4ec25486ab149⋯.jpg (2.78 MB,4000x2667,4000:2667,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 5a8ede1096bdb7a⋯.jpg (366.36 KB,1046x891,1046:891,Clipboard.jpg)

File: f441ac024e41005⋯.jpg (735.89 KB,3000x2000,3:2,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23835108 (100820ZNOV25) Notable: Wurundjeri file native title claim over most of Greater Melbourne – The Wurundjeri people have lodged a 10,420 sq km native title claim covering most of Greater Melbourne, from Werribee River to Mount Baw Baw and including the Macedon Ranges, Yarra Valley and Port Phillip Bay. The bid, overlapping with the Boonwurrung claim, comes as Victoria prepares to sign its first statewide treaty. While freehold property rights are unaffected, the claim could expand Wurundjeri influence over parks, waterways and cultural sites, including fire-management practices in the Dandenongs and Great Dividing Range. Elders say they turned to native title after losing confidence in the state-based regime, seeking recognition of their traditional laws and an “intrinsic connection” to the Birrarung. The Tribunal will assess the claim as more Victorian groups prepare similar bids.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122202

>>122203

>>122478

Wurundjeri file native title claim over most of Greater Melbourne

Chip Le Grand - November 10, 2025

1/2

The Wurundjeri people have lodged a native title claim over most of Greater Melbourne in documents filed with the Federal Court, more than 30 years after the landmark Mabo decision.

The 10,420-square-kilometre claim, which stretches from the Werribee River in the west to the base of Mount Baw Baw in the east and takes in the Macedon Ranges, the Yarra Valley and the top of Port Phillip Bay, follows successful native title claims by First Peoples over Adelaide and Perth.

It will bring to a head a long-running territorial dispute between Wurundjeri Woiwurrung and the neighbouring Boonwurrung people, whose unresolved native title bid overlaps significantly with land and waterways the Wurundjeri claim as theirs.

The lodgement of the claim, which brings to seven the number of native title applications before the Federal Court in Victoria, comes as Premier Jacinta Allan and the First Peoples’ Assembly prepare to sign the state’s first treaty agreement with its Aboriginal people.

The claim won’t have any impact on the rights of property owners in Melbourne, but could give Wurundjeri people greater influence over land and water use and the protection of culturally significant sites. This might include the use of traditional, wildfire prevention practices in the Dandenong Ranges and swaths of the Great Dividing Range.

A formal signing of the Victorian treaty is scheduled for Wednesday evening on the banks of the Yarra and will be followed the next morning by the legislation receiving royal assent from Governor Margaret Gardner at a closed meeting at Government House. A public event to celebrate the treaty is planned at Federation Square on December 12.

Although the Wurundjeri claim is not connected to the historic statewide treaty, it is part of a push by traditional owner groups across the state to consolidate their land rights through native title before they enter into their own treaty negotiations with the government.

An Aboriginal leader not authorised to speak about the Wurundjeri claim said it also signalled that First Peoples in Victoria had lost faith in the Traditional Owner Settlement Act, a state-based regime established by the Brumby government as an alternative to the federal native title system to secure their rights.

The Labor-aligned law firm acting for Wurundjeri, Slater and Gordon, expects the claim, if registered by the Native Title Tribunal, will be resolved through mediation with neighbouring Aboriginal groups and a negotiated settlement with the Victorian government rather that contested litigation.

Wurundjeri elder Uncle Perry Wandin, whose father Jim was recorded as the last Aboriginal person born at the site of the Coranderrk Aboriginal reserve secured by renowned Wurundjeri leader William Barak, said his mob had resorted to native title after becoming disillusioned at the way land rights were divvied up under the state regime.

“I have watched us lose the land we had, with every claim group trying to take parts of our country,” he said. “It is now time for the traditional lore and customs of the Wurundjeri Woiwurrung people to be recognised.”

Fellow claimant and Wurundjeri elder Uncle Bill Nicholson said that securing greater rights over the management of the Yarra River, known in Woiwurrung language as Birrarung, was central to the Wurundjeri claim.

“Part of our sovereign inheritance, handed down from our ancestors, is to care for Country, community and culture,” he said. “The Birrarung, all its catchments and all the land associated with it, is part of that inheritance.

“If we get native title over the Birrarung and the Maribyrnong as well, our voice and understanding of what caring for Country is all about will hopefully be listened to.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122506

File: 5a2ff04c175b6af⋯.jpg (498.2 KB,3777x2079,1259:693,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 2a12c0637096346⋯.jpg (486.58 KB,1275x1650,17:22,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 4d403b57fa7f11e⋯.jpg (578.19 KB,1275x1650,17:22,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 361d4797038a83e⋯.jpg (469.32 KB,1275x1650,17:22,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 5324dd1a0f77e56⋯.jpg (225.48 KB,1275x1650,17:22,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23835140 (100834ZNOV25) Notable: The avowed Nazi who signed protest application letter to police commissioner – NSW Police are facing scrutiny after a four-page Form 1 application for an anti-Jewish rally — signed by 28-year-old neo-Nazi Jack Eltis — was approved without escalation to senior command. Eltis, the NSW leader of the National Socialist Network and public advocate for deporting “every last non-white”, lodged the application under the “White Australia” brand, signalling its push for political registration. Despite his documented extremist rhetoric, local police cleared the “Abolish the Jewish Lobby” rally, later described by ASIO chief Mike Burgess as part of a growing threat of propaganda capable of prompting spontaneous violence. Commissioner Mal Lanyon only learned of the event after media inquiries. Officers are now reviewing whether the rally’s Hitler-linked chants and conspiratorial claims breached new laws against public incitement of racial hatred, amid broader concerns about internal communication failures.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122489

>>122494

>>122502

The avowed Nazi who signed protest application letter to police commissioner

Patrick Begley and Riley Walter - November 10, 2025

1/2

A four-page letter addressed to Police Commissioner Mal Lanyon outlining plans for an anti-Jewish rally outside parliament was signed by an avowed racist and neo-Nazi, according to a copy of the Form 1 application seen by the Herald.

The history of public antisemitism and racism by 28-year-old Jack Eltis – the NSW leader of the National Socialist Network who last month called to deport “every last non-white” from Australia – raises questions as to why the protest plans were never flagged with senior police or politicians.

Australian Security Intelligence Organisation (ASIO) director-general Mike Burgess last week warned of an increasing likelihood that the NSN’s propaganda would “prompt spontaneous violence”. Two months ago, NSW Police assured the public that the NSN was being “constantly monitored” by officers from the engagement and hate crime unit, the state intelligence group and the counter-terrorism command.

Eltis signed his Form 1 letter on behalf of White Australia, a brand increasingly used by the NSN as it plans to register as a political party.

Outlining the proposed slogan “Abolish the Jewish Lobby”, Eltis said the event would focus on free speech issues, including new laws around protests and incitement of racial hatred. He cited a High Court case and legislation, promising the rally would not violate anti-discrimination laws, as it would not target “Jewish people as an ethnic or religious community”.

“We look forward to a safe and impactful event,” he wrote.

But the polite, deferential tone adopted in the letter was a far cry from Eltis’ public record of hateful rhetoric and the tenor of the rally itself, which “criticised Jews’ position at the head of [the] table”, promoted a highly offensive conspiracy theory and contained Hitler Youth chants, including “blood and honour”, which is banned under German law because of its connection to the Nazi party.

Lanyon was not made aware of the protest until after the Herald sent questions to NSW Police about the demonstration. He told a press conference that afternoon that, as a result of the “communication error”, he had not briefed Premier Chris Minns and Police Minister Yasmin Catley.

The rally had not been opposed by the Sydney City local area command, which had sought legal advice on the proposed “Abolish the Jewish lobby” banner, and Minns has suggested the government may seek to pass new laws. According to the legal advice given to police, the wording used on the banner did not constitute an offence, and there were no legal grounds upon which to oppose the demonstration.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122507

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23835160 (100843ZNOV25) Notable: Video: NSW plans urgent ban on Nazi phrases after weekend rally – NSW is preparing urgent laws to ban Nazi slogans and fascist-linked attire after police approved a White Australia neo-Nazi rally outside parliament without informing Premier Chris Minns or Commissioner Mal Lanyon. Speaker Greg Piper said he only learned of the event the night before and tried unsuccessfully to have it moved, arguing hatred “should not own that space”. Police said legal advice found the banner “Abolish the Jewish lobby” did not breach existing laws but confirmed a review into why the rally was not escalated. The Minns government wants to criminalise Nazi chants such as “blood and honour” and behaviour “consistent” with Nazi racism. Opposition Leader Mark Speakman said the proposed crackdown had merit, as MPs who criticised the rally reported receiving vile online abuse.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122489

>>122494

>>122502

>>122506

NSW plans urgent ban on Nazi phrases after weekend rally

LACHLAN LEEMING - 10 November 2025

The use of Nazi slogans and wearing fascist-related attire could be banned in NSW within the fortnight, as criticism mounts after an application by the White Australia neo-Nazi movement was waved through by police, enabling Saturday’s rally of black-clad protesters to go ahead on state parliament’s doorstep.

It came as NSW Speaker Greg Piper, whose role includes responsibility for what happens within state parliament grounds, revealed he was made aware of the gathering the night before, with the MP claiming he unsuccessfully pushed to have it moved.

Mr Piper said his office contacted parliament security to urge police to divert it from the front of parliament.

“(I) was advised it couldn’t be done at that time … My view is such a hatred should not own that space – and that’s exactly what they were delivered. They were delivered vacant space in front of the (parliament) … and that’s not right,” he said.

The NSW Opposition on Monday seized on the rally going ahead without NSW Premier Chris Minns or Police Commissioner Mal Lanyon being made aware, saying the communication breakdown was a “stuff up”.

“I would have thought (it would) be pretty obvious within the police force, which police officers knew about this rally. I don’t understand why we can’t find that out straight away. Why is there a need for some apparently lengthy investigation? It is a stuff up,” Opposition leader Mark Speakman said.

NSW Police confirmed Monday that White Australia – linked to the National Socialist Network whose members rallied at state parliament on Saturday – had filed the form required for protests to go ahead.

Police in a statement said they sought legal advice over a banner brandished at the protest which read ‘Abolish the Jewish lobby’, but found “the actual wording did not constitute an offence”.

“An investigation is underway, and police will review all available material to determine whether any offences occurred and will take action if appropriate and put people before the courts,” NSW Police said.

“As publicly stated by Commissioner Lanyon, the communication issue was the fact that he had not been personally briefed, so had not had the opportunity to brief either the (police) minister or government and a review is underway into that process.”

It’s understood the NSW Government will attempt to legislate new laws cracking down on hate speech loopholes as soon as this fortnight, after attendees at the rally chanted ‘blood and honour’ – a Hitler Youth slogan.

It’s understood laws are being considered which would ban Nazi slogans being used in public as well as targeting ‘behaviour consistent’ with Nazi racism, such as wearing attire linked to the Nazi party or white nationalist movement.

Premier Minns hinted at the structure of new laws on Monday, saying “we need to draw bigger, bolder, bright lines between hate speech and free speech”.

“I don’t think that the laws are clear enough and as a result we need to make it crystal clear that this can’t be tolerated,” Mr Minns said.

“It’s illegal to have Nazi symbols in New South Wales, but not … Nazi speeches or Nazi slogans.”

In a sign the proposed law changes would receive bipartisan support, Opposition leader Mr Speakman said the changes had “merit”.

“If displaying a Nazi symbol is so obnoxious (to be) criminalised, equally chanting a Nazi slogan or wearing some sort of Nazi paraphernalia is just as bad. So I can see a very good case for criminalising it,” he said.

Federal MP Allegra Spender and NSW MP Kellie Sloane, who both have large Jewish populations in their electorates, were both subject to vile online comments after they both spoke out against the rally.

Ms Sloane subsequently deleted her X social media profile, adding on Monday she had been thinking of taking the move before the latest wave of abuse.

“I will not be bullied out of saying what I think, and I will stand up for people in my community and for the broader community of Sydney who don’t like hate, who don’t want division anymore, and who don’t accept this kind of behaviour,” she said.

The police review, and questions over why the rally wasn’t escalated to Commissioner Lanyon or Premier Minns, will be one of several flashpoints in the final sittings weeks of NSW Parliament for the year.

Labor will also attempt to pass controversial reforms to workers’ compensation in NSW, while the state’s Nationals are poised to follow their counterparts and dump support for Net Zero by 2050.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/nsw-plans-urgent-ban-on-nazi-phrases-after-weekend-rally/news-story/d338be88a2a35d474765891dd2f721fb

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1_iISCUneSQ

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122508

File: b15d7353c5da4b4⋯.jpg (221.27 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 576be659bc07cf6⋯.jpg (210.44 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 123c8566d21bb18⋯.jpg (269.71 KB,2048x2731,2048:2731,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 720a95f853dc311⋯.jpg (220.86 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23835180 (100851ZNOV25) Notable: ‘Poison Pill’ AUKUS sceptics rolled inside Pentagon, says Kurt Campbell – Former US deputy secretary of state Kurt Campbell says Pentagon officials who tried to derail AUKUS have been “rolled”, with the ongoing review now expected to endorse the pact with only minor adjustments. He said Undersecretary of Defence Elbridge Colby mishandled the review and sowed uncertainty until Donald Trump forcefully reaffirmed support for AUKUS during talks with Anthony Albanese. Campbell described “strategic disarray” inside the Pentagon amid purges and resignations, but said Australian lobbying by Richard Marles and Kevin Rudd helped neutralise internal opposition. He argued Colby’s approach had “hurt him politically” and that key policy ideas – restricting Ukraine arms, cutting AUKUS – had been “snipped at the bud”. Campbell said negative media coverage overlooked “remarkable progress” on AUKUS over the past five years.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122248

>>122417

>>122429

>>122496

>>122499

‘Poison Pill’ AUKUS sceptics rolled inside Pentagon, says Kurt Campbell

CAMERON STEWART - 10 November 2025

“Poison pill” officials in the Pentagon who were sceptical of AUKUS have been rolled and the current review of the nuclear submarine pact is likely to back it with only minor changes, according to former US deputy secretary of state Kurt Campbell.

Dr Campbell said he believed Undersecretary of Defence Elbridge Colby had mishandled the Pentagon’s AUKUS review and had undermined confidence until Donald Trump strongly affirmed his support for the pact in his recent meeting with Anthony Albanese.

Dr Campbell, now chairman of The Asia Group, said there were signs of “strategic disarray” within the Pentagon, which has been hit by purges, resignations, media restrictions and upheaval under Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth.

But he said the apparent scepticism of some senior Pentagon officials to AUKUS had been overcome, in part, by successful lobbying by Australia.

“I think there were one or two people in the Defence Department that had basically placed what we would call a poison pill in some of the work that was ongoing,” Dr Campbell told The Australian after appearing at the UBS Australasia Conference in Sydney.

“But I think through the good work of Deputy Prime Minister (Richard) Marles, Kevin Rudd, many, many others, a lot of that had been disarmed, and you saw the President reaffirm AUKUS in very positive tones and terms.”

Mr Trump strongly backed the AUKUS pact in his meeting with Mr Albanese in Washington last month ahead of the findings of a review into AUKUS commissioned by Mr Colby, who was once an AUKUS sceptic. Mr Colby’s decision in June to call for a review of AUKUS was played down by the US at the time as being standard behaviour for a new administration. But it unnerved Australia and the UK.

“I don’t think this has been a particularly successful endeavour for ‘Bridge’ Colby. I think this has hurt him politically badly,” Dr Campbell said. “I think it has undermined confidence. And, you know, allies and partners in the Indo-Pacific basically share a view of concern about how he’s approached elements of his job.

“But I can’t imagine, after the President has held forth with such positive reviews, that there’s going to be anything significant that (the review) will do.”

Mr Colby, the third-most powerful civilian Pentagon official, has been accused of freelancing on defence policy without the President’s backing, including when Mr Trump overruled Mr Colby earlier this year on the question of weapons sales to Ukraine.

“Certain elements of capacity in the Pentagon had been undeniably affected. I think some of the stuff that had been anticipated in the policy shop run by ‘Bridge’ Colby, you know, restricting arms to Ukraine, perhaps cutting off AUKUS, and a variety of other initiatives, appear to have been snipped at the bud. But I think (there are) some signs of strategic disarray,” Dr Campbell said. “The hope is that the Pentagon, which is a key institutional player in the Indo-Pacific and in the US-Australia relationship, maintains forward momentum.”

Republicans used a recent congressional hearing to express frustration over the secrecy of the AUKUS review, which was commissioned in June but the findings of which have still not been released.

Dr Campbell said he believed media coverage of AUKUS was too negative compared with the reality of the progress made so far.

“It is amazing how negative most of the stories are (and) I think what is often lost is the remarkable progress that it’s made in five years, and it really is quite significant, and I expect this to proceed,” he said.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/poison-pill-aukus-sceptics-rolled-inside-pentagon-says-kurt-campbell/news-story/b42bc256a26eb9a48e2ce397eae4eb1b

https://qresear.ch/?q=Kurt+Campbell

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122509

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23839293 (110811ZNOV25) Notable: Video: Premier’s promised mask laws to fall short amid prospect of legal challenges – Victoria will water down its planned protest mask ban, with new laws allowing face coverings unless police reasonably suspect someone is committing or about to commit an offence. Exemptions will apply for health, cultural and religious reasons. The shift follows warnings a blanket ban could breach the constitution’s implied freedom of political communication and trigger court challenges, as well as internal Labor concerns. Premier Jacinta Allan had pledged a full ban after the Adass Israel Synagogue firebombing and pro-Gaza protests she said involved “extreme” behaviour. The bill will also outlaw terrorist symbols and protest devices such as glue and chains, and restrict - but not ban - protests outside places of worship. Jewish groups are expected to be disappointed, while the opposition says the changes are too weak.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122398

>>122399

>>122401

Premier’s promised mask laws to fall short amid prospect of legal challenges

Chip Le Grand and Rachel Eddie - November 10, 2025

1/2

Protesters will be free to conceal their identity at public demonstrations unless they are instructed by police to remove face coverings under weaker than promised mask laws to be considered by the state cabinet on Tuesday.

Under the proposed new legislation, police can only order the removal of masks if they reasonably suspect a protester is committing or about to commit a criminal offence. Even in these circumstances, exemptions can apply for health, cultural and religious reasons.

However, the government was facing the prospect of possible court challenges to the constitutionality of a blanket mask ban, as well as a potential revolt from Labor Party faithful.

The details were confirmed by three sources with knowledge of the government’s plans. The bill will be introduced to parliament this week, if approved by cabinet on Tuesday, among other law and order measures.

The proposed laws fall short of what Premier Jacinta Allan pledged in the aftermath of the firebombing of the Adass Israel Synagogue and then weekly protests against Israel’s bombardment of Gaza, which she said had included “extreme, dangerous and radical conduct” and antisemitism by some of those who attended.

Speaking shortly after the synagogue was destroyed by arsonists, Allan promised to stop protesters using face masks to hide their identity and counter the use of pepper spray by police.

“We’ll ban the use of face masks and balaclavas at protests,” Allan said on December 17 last year.

“We know they are being used to conceal identities to shield agitators from crowd control measures like capsicum spray. Face masks aren’t a free pass to break the law. There should be no place to hide in this state if you’re a racist stirring up hate on the streets.”

Under Victorian law, police already have the power to direct someone to remove face coverings if they are within a “designated area” – a geographic space gazetted by police for the purpose of deploying greater search powers.

If a protester refuses to comply, police can direct them to leave. Failure to comply with a direction is an offence.

Under the proposed new laws, police will no longer have to designate an area to request the removal of face masks but must comply with the reasonable suspicion provision.

The government’s attempt to strike a balance between legal concerns and its promise to crack down on extreme behaviour at public demonstrations, while likely to be cautiously welcomed by libertarian and legal advocates, will disappoint Jewish community organisations.

It is also likely to prompt heated debate around the cabinet table on Tuesday.

Opposition police spokesman David Southwick said the proposed changes were too little, too late and would frustrate people who had been waiting for the government to take strong action.

“It is simply going to provide more cover for people who want to break the law,” he said.

The opposition has already pledged that a Coalition government would ban face masks and reinstate move-on powers to help police deal with violent and disruptive protests.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122510

File: c79f53788e848a3⋯.jpg (279.64 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 98a6ee4cd289078⋯.jpg (244.84 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23839301 (110826ZNOV25) Notable: NSW reveals new laws to stop protests outside places of worship - NSW will reintroduce protest laws allowing police to move on demonstrators who harass, block or intimidate people entering or leaving places of worship, after the previous version was struck down in a Supreme Court challenge led by Palestine Action Group organiser Josh Lees. The revised bill ties police powers directly to Crimes Act offences and is part of a broader response to a neo-Nazi rally outside parliament that Premier Chris Minns and Police Minister Yasmin Catley say they were not told about. Minns will also seek to scrap a sunset clause on hate speech laws, arguing “Nazis are not welcome in NSW”. The government is examining bans on Nazi slogans and behaviour, while the opposition proposes limits on protest frequency and cost burdens.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>109477 (pb)

>>122385

>>122488

>>122502

NSW reveals new laws to stop protests outside places of worship

LACHLAN LEEMING - 11 November 2025

Fresh legislation enabling police to move on protesters harassing or obstructing visitors to places of worship will be reintroduced by the NSW government, after their initial attempt was struck down by a Supreme Court challenge headed by Palestine Action Group ­agitator Josh Lees.

The change is one of a slew of legal moves being taken as the state government reels from a neo-Nazi rally outside NSW parliament at the weekend, with Premier Chris Minns and Police Minister Yasmin Catley on Tuesday insisting their offices had no prior knowledge of the gathering.

The government will now try to thread a legal needle after the Supreme Court last month ruled out a previous bid to introduce powers enabling police to move on protesters outside places of worship.

The fresh legislation, first revealed by The Australia, has been rejigged with a caveat that protesters who harass, block or intimidate worshippers entering or leaving churches, synagogues, mosques or temples can now be moved on.

The new law narrows police dispersal powers, directly linking them to offences under the Crimes Act that prohibit blocking, impeding, hindering or intimidating a person attempting to access or leave a place of worship.

Mr Minns also announced his government would attempt to remove a sunset clause added to previous hate speech laws, which would have extinguished the legislation within three years.

“Does anyone believe that anti-Semitism will stop in 2½ years’ time? This sunset clause should never have been included in the bill; we’re going to attempt to remove it,” he told parliament.

“We will be asking for the house’s bipartisan (and) multi-partisan support in order to send a clear and unambiguous message: Nazis are not welcome in NSW.”

NSW Attorney-General Michael Daley, who will introduce the new protest laws to parliament next week, said the fresh legislation would ensure “the NSW Police Force retains appropriate move-on powers”.

“This change strikes the right balance between protecting the community and the right to protest,” he told The Australian.

The legal tightrope comes after the Supreme Court in October struck down amendments to protest legislation being pushed by the NSW government as part of a suite of hate speech laws.

Mr Lees brought the challenge, with his lawyers successfully ­arguing that powers allowing police to disperse protesters near places of worship “impermissibly burdens the constitutionally ­implied freedom of political communication”.

The Palestine Action Group organiser has led almost weekly protests around Sydney since the October 7, 2023, attack by Hamas on Israel, with the 43-year-old heading at least 85 rallies, which are estimated to have cost more than $10m and tied up at least 20,000 NSW police officers.

These protests included the August march across the Sydney Harbour Bridge, which was unsuccessfully challenged in the NSW Supreme Court by NSW police on the grounds it would cause significant disruption to the city.

The NSW government is also investigating legislation emulating a German law forbidding Nazi slogans being used in public – after members of the National Socialist Network chanted the Hitler Youth phrase “blood and honour’’ at NSW parliament on Saturday.

Behaviour consistent with Nazi groups would also be outlawed, which could target attire worn in public.

The NSW opposition also announced on Tuesday that it would move its own slew of legislation, including that specific groups would be allowed three protests a year before having to pay for the police resources they suck up.

The opposition would also force courts deliberating whether a protest should go ahead to consider impacts including the cost to taxpayers, the frequency of protests by the same group, and whether there were less disruptive routes available.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/nsw-reveals-new-laws-to-stop-protests-outside-places-of-worship/news-story/7c29ed6dc58e35685091bef6b3ba4a61

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122511

File: 10b88b2635e026c⋯.jpg (109.08 KB,1280x720,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 1709436d3dedd03⋯.jpg (192.21 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 8017c247d745fab⋯.jpg (149.77 KB,1067x1423,1067:1423,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23839306 (110835ZNOV25) Notable: Brittany Higgins likely to be declared bankrupt over Linda Reynolds’ defamation case - Brittany Higgins is expected to be declared bankrupt after former senator Linda Reynolds filed a creditors’ petition seeking a sequestration order to place Higgins’ financial affairs under a trustee. It follows August’s defamation ruling, where Justice Paul Tottle found Higgins had made “objectively untrue and misleading statements” and ordered her to pay Reynolds $340,000 in damages plus about 80 percent of legal costs, bringing her total liability to well over $1m. The trustee will gain full access to Higgins’ financial records, including the “protective trust” holding proceeds of her $2.4m Commonwealth payout, and may require her passport if she is deemed a flight risk. Higgins, who reportedly spent more than $600,000 on her defence, is not expected to appear. Her husband, David Sharaz, faces a similar action next month.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122229

>>122232

>>122348

>>122377

>>122432

Brittany Higgins likely to be declared bankrupt over Linda Reynolds’ defamation case

STEPHEN RICE - 10 November 2025

Brittany Higgins is likely to be declared bankrupt in the Federal Court on Tuesday, less than three months after she was ordered to pay former senator Linda Rey­nolds well over $1m in defamation damages and legal expenses.

Ms Reynolds filed a creditors petition against Ms Higgins and her lawyers will ask judge Craig Colvin for a sequestration order that allows a trustee in bankruptcy to take control of her property and financial affairs.

The move takes the former Liberal minister one step closer to discovering whether Ms Higgins retains any of the $2.4m compensation payout she was awarded by the Commonwealth in 2022 after claiming mistreatment and a political cover-up by her former boss.

It is understood Ms Higgins will not be making an appearance in the Perth court, and may not oppose the order. However, if she has no legal representation, Justice Colvin may elect to defer a decision to allow her to reconsider, as bankruptcy has serious consequences and cannot be easily unwound.

The next step will be for the court to appoint a trustee in bankruptcy, who will immediately take control of Ms Higgins’s financial affairs. Ms Reynolds will then become a creditor of the estate. The trustee in bankruptcy will require information from Ms Higgins about every aspect of her financial affairs, including access to the “protective trust” that held the proceeds of her compensation payment.

If Ms Higgins is considered a flight risk, the trustee may require her to hand over her passport. People who declared bankrupt are generally not permitted to travel outside the country without the consent of the trustee.

Ms Higgins’s husband, David Sharaz, also pursued in bankruptcy by Ms Reynolds, will face a similar hearing on December 16.

West Australian Supreme Court judge Paul Tottle in August found Ms Higgins had defamed Ms Reynolds through a series of social media posts, awarding the one-time defence minister $340,000 in damages and interest.

That figure was dwarfed by Justice Tottle’s subsequent costs order, which found Ms Higgins liable for 80 per cent of Ms Rey­nolds’s legal costs. That alone is estimated at around $1.5m.

Justice Tottle ruled that an early settlement offer by Ms Higgins – tabled four days before the trial was to begin – could not be considered reasonable.

The offer included a “mutual statement of regret” that would have led to Ms Reynolds acknowledging Ms Higgins believed she was not given appropriate support after being allegedly raped in Parliament House.

Justice Tottle found the mutual statement “fell short of an apology by a substantial margin”.

He found Ms Higgins had made “objectively untrue and misleading statements” when she first went public with her allegations that Ms Reynolds had engaged in a cover-up of her alleged rape.

Ms Higgins dropped an appeal against the judgment three weeks ago. She has reportedly spent more than $600,000 on her own legal team during her unsuccessful defence against Ms Reynolds’s defamation claim.

Bankruptcy declarations by Ms Higgins and Mr Sharaz could open a path for Ms Reynolds to ­secure a portion of their ­future earnings.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/brittany-higgins-likely-to-be-declared-bankrupt-over-linda-reynolds-defamation-case/news-story/8bba1094f8439820a38e2d38b905fbe7

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122512

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23843505 (120845ZNOV25) Notable: ‘New era’: Australia, Indonesia strike surprise security treaty - (Video) Australia and Indonesia have unveiled a landmark security treaty committing both nations to consult one another in the event of a threat, marking what Prime Minister Anthony Albanese called a “new era” in bilateral ties. Announced in Sydney with Indonesian President-elect Prabowo Subianto, the pact represents the closest security alignment in the nations’ history, stopping short of a formal military alliance but extending well beyond previous agreements, including the Lombok Treaty. The tightly held deal will mandate regular leader-level discussions on security risks and expand co-operative activities across defence and intelligence. Foreign Minister Penny Wong said it reflects “deep trust” under the Comprehensive Strategic Partnership. Analysts say the treaty is a major shift for Indonesia, long protective of its non-aligned posture. Albanese aims to sign the pact in Jakarta in January.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122339

‘New era’: Australia, Indonesia strike surprise security treaty

Matthew Knott - November 12, 2025

1/2

Australia and Indonesia will commit to consult each other if they face a security threat under a landmark new treaty that ties the two neighbours closer together than at any time in their history.

In a major foreign policy achievement for Anthony Albanese, the prime minister declared on Wednesday that relations between Australia and Indonesia have entered a “new era” with the treaty.

The treaty process began with a proposal by Australia when Albanese visited Indonesia for his first overseas trip since his May election victory, according to sources familiar with the negotiations but not able to speak publicly.

During that trip Albanese told counterpart Prabowo Subianto that he wanted to go further than previous agreements, and the leaders agreed to delegate their foreign ministers to negotiate the details.

The treaty announcement came as former prime minister Paul Keating - a champion of closer ties with Indonesia - blasted the outgoing president of the Returned and Services League (RSL) for criticising the Albanese government for its level of defence spending in a Remembrance Day speech in Canberra.

Indonesia, the world’s largest Muslim-majority democracy, has jealously guarded its non-aligned status as it balances relations between China and the United States.

There have also been significant moments of tension between Indonesia and Australia, including over East Timorese independence, asylum seekers and death sentences for Australian drug smugglers.

“This is a watershed moment in the Australia-Indonesia relationship,” Albanese said, standing beside Indonesian Prabowo to make the surprise announcement at the Garden Island naval base in Sydney.

“This treaty represents a major extension of our existing security and defence co-operation. It shows the relationship is as strong as it has ever been.”

The details of the agreement were tightly held by a small group of officials until the last moment, preventing them from being leaked to the media.

The treaty falls short of a formal military alliance, meaning it is not as extensive as that reached earlier this year between Australia and Papua New Guinea.

But it is still a significant foreign policy moment given Indonesia’s huge population, economic heft and military power.

It will commit the leaders of Australia and Indonesia to regularly discuss security issues and consult each other in the event of a threat to either nation’s security or a mutual threat to consider what actions should be taken in response.

The agreement also commits the nations to agree to promote “mutually beneficial co-operative activities in the security field”.

Albanese said he hoped to travel to Indonesia in January to sign the pact after it is approved by both national parliaments.

Prabowo said the agreement will “let us face our destiny with the best of intentions”, adding that in Indonesian culture there is a saying that “good neighbours will help each other in times of difficulties”.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122513

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23843512 (120851ZNOV25) Notable: Video: Jacinta Allan vows life sentences possible for children as young as 14 - Premier Jacinta Allan will overhaul Victoria’s youth justice system, moving to an “adult crime, adult time” model that sends offenders aged 14 and over to adult courts for violent crimes, exposing them to significantly longer sentences, including life imprisonment. Children charged with aggravated home invasion, home invasion, aggravated carjacking and gross-violence assaults using weapons will be automatically shifted to the County Court, removing these offences from the Children’s Court. Ms Allan said youth offenders must face “serious consequences” amid rising public anger over violent home invasions and machete attacks. Attorney-General Sonya Kilkenny said adult courts better reflect community expectations. Legal groups warn the changes will harm vulnerable children, but the government views youth crime as an escalating political liability heading into the 2026 election.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122450

>>122509

Jacinta Allan vows life sentences possible for children as young as 14

ANTHONY GALLOWAY - 12 November 2025

Premier Jacinta Allan will follow Queensland in adopting “adult crime, adult time” laws, promising to force children as young as 14 into adult courts and expose them to longer jail time, including life sentences, under a sweeping overhaul of Victoria’s youth justice laws.

As she faces growing public anger about the state’s law-and-order crisis, Ms Allan will on Wednesday announce a major pivot in Victoria’s approach to youth crime that will require children charged with offences such as aggravated home invasion and carjackings to face adult sentences in adult courts.

The announcement comes after Ms Allan faced questions on Tuesday over partially backing down on her promise to ban masks at protests after a marathon cabinet meeting in which ministers thrashed out the details on the broad crime and protest crackdown.

The reforms – to be introduced to parliament this year and operational by 2026 – come as police, victims’ advocates and sections of the judiciary warn of escalating youth violence, particularly brazen home invasions and weaponised assaults involving machetes.

“We want the courts to treat these violent children like adults, so jail is more likely and sentences are longer,” Ms Allan said.

“Adult time for violent crime will mean more violent youth offenders going to jail, facing serious consequences.”

The move follows David Crisa­fulli’s crackdown on youth crime in Queensland, which has seen adult time for youth crime expand to 33 offences.

Under the new Victorian regime, any child 14 or older charged with aggravated home invasion, home invasion, aggravated carjacking and intentionally or recklessly causing injury in circumstances of “gross violence” such as using machetes will automatically be sent to the County Court.

Those offences will be removed from the jurisdiction of the Children’s Court altogether.

A further three offences of carjacking, aggravated burglary and armed robbery will be subject to the laws but may be dealt with by the Children’s Court.

Currently, just 34 per cent of young people sentenced for aggravated home invasion or aggravated carjacking in the Children’s Court receive a custodial sentence. When the same crimes are sentenced in an adult court, that figure hits 97 per cent.

The maximum jail term the Children’s Court can impose is three years, regardless of the gravity of the offence. In the County Court, aggravated home invasion and aggravated carjacking carry penalties of up to 25 years. The Allan government will now increase those maximums to life imprisonment for offenders aged 14 and above.

Attorney-General Sonya Kilkenny said adult courts placed “more emphasis on victims, violence and community safety”, which better reflected community expectations.

“There are no easy solutions to youth crime, and the best approach is always to stop crime before it starts. But we absolutely need serious consequences for violent youth crime to protect the community now.”

The government is pitching the changes as the first in a series of reforms on early intervention to tackle youth crime, which has been steadily worsening in Victoria since the pandemic. It follows sustained pressure from police unions, community groups and victims of violent youth offenders who say the system fails to protect the public.

Legal and human rights groups are expected to push back on the plan, arguing the changes will disproportionately affect vulnerable and disadvantaged children and add strain to an already stretched court system.

But the Allan government is intent on getting a hold of the youth crime crisis a year out from the November 2026 election, with internal polling understood to be telling the party that it is a significant vulnerability.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/jacinta-allan-vows-life-sentences-possible-for-children-as-young-as-14/news-story/af86687464122537b071210d702bd080

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0OBaKgceoYw

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122514

File: 5a2ff04c175b6af⋯.jpg (498.2 KB,3777x2079,1259:693,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 4ffb823efd4be67⋯.jpg (129.01 KB,953x1300,953:1300,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23843517 (120859ZNOV25) Notable: Far-right figure who visited ‘motherland’ Germany is close to forming national party - The neo-Nazi organiser of Saturday’s anti-Jewish rally, 28-year-old Jack Eltis, has travelled to Germany – which he called “the motherland” – to meet far-right groups as part of the National Socialist Network’s push to register a political party and run candidates federally and in NSW. NSW Police intelligence officers knew of the rally in advance, but Deputy Commissioner David Hudson, who oversees counter-terrorism, was not briefed, deepening scrutiny of police handling after Commissioner Mal Lanyon was also kept in the dark. About 60 NSN members gathered outside parliament chanting extremist slogans. Eltis says the party is “90 per cent” formed and aims for mass deportations. ASIO warns the NSN’s rhetoric is increasingly violent and risks “spontaneous violence”. The Minns government is now moving to tighten hate-speech and protest laws.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122506

Far-right figure who visited ‘motherland’ Germany is close to forming national party

Jordan Baker - November 12, 2025

1/2

The neo-Nazi organiser of an anti-Jewish rally in Sydney went on a study tour to Germany, which he referred to as “the motherland”, to meet a far-right group as part of the National Socialist Network’s push to register as a political party and run for seats in Australia’s state and federal parliaments.

Amid growing fallout from Saturday’s police-approved rally outside the NSW Parliament, the Herald can also reveal intelligence officers knew about the gathering in advance, but Deputy Commissioner David Hudson, who oversees counter-terrorism and has been the force’s public face of the fight against antisemitism, was not briefed.

The revelation raises further questions of NSW Police’s handling of the saga after it emerged that another of the force’s deputy commissioners, Peter Thurtell, was briefed before the protest but did not relay the information to newly installed Commissioner Mal Lanyon.

Police investigations into Saturday’s rally are ongoing to determine if any offences were committed.

Thurtell, who oversees NSW Police’s metropolitan field operations, said he did not inform Lanyon of the rally in an “oversight” and has since apologised. In September, he told budget estimates the group was of “such concern” to police that counter-terrorism police and intelligence officers were “constantly monitoring” its activities.

NSW Police said counter-terrorism officers had prepared a briefing for the local police area command, which had oversight of the rally. Officers from the public order and riot squad, which Hudson also oversees, attended the gathering.

About 60 black-clad NSN members gathered outside NSW Parliament to call for the abolishment of Jewish lobby groups and protest against newly introduced hate speech legislation, triggering a political firestorm.

NSW Premier Chris Minns declared the protest should not have gone ahead, but Lanyon has argued existing laws may not have been strong enough to block it – a claim disputed by several legal experts.

With Thomas Sewell, the NSN’s national leader, in jail, Jack Eltis – a 28-year-old Sydney air-conditioner mechanic – has risen to second-in-command of the National Socialist Network, as well as leader of its NSW branch.

In June, Eltis said he went to Germany on a “combined business and personal” trip. He met with another nationalist organisation, JN, or Jung Nationalist. In a social media post sighted by this masthead and headed “shoutout to the motherland”, he said he was planning to return to Europe, “our ancestral lands”, to meet with other far-right organisations.

Minns on Saturday said he had struggled with giving the NSN the attention its members craved but said it was important to condemn the ugly scenes. ASIO director-general Mike Burgess has also warned that the NSN celebrates even the most critical coverage because it leads to a surge in membership applications.

The Herald and The Age have chosen not to repeat several of Eltis’ claims, but have published some information about his activities that are relevant to the political debate over Saturday’s protests and the ambitions of the NSN.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122515

File: 6865ebe5df75718⋯.jpg (4.13 MB,3000x1529,3000:1529,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 059e0144b916b41⋯.jpg (3.99 MB,3000x2000,3:2,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23843541 (120915ZNOV25) Notable: Russia loses High Court battle with Commonwealth over Canberra embassy site, but will be compensated - Russia has lost its High Court challenge to the 2023 law that revoked its lease on a prime embassy site in Canberra, with the court ruling the Albanese government acted lawfully on national security grounds. The lease, granted in 2008 for nearly $3 million, was cancelled after ASIO warned the planned embassy posed a potential security threat, prompting emergency legislation and a diplomatic row. Although the law was upheld, the court found Russia is entitled to compensation for works already completed. The National Capital Authority had earlier tried to revoke the stalled project after years of inaction, and a Russian official briefly occupied the site in protest. Attorney-General Michelle Rowland said Australia “will always stand up for our national security”. The future of the site is undecided.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Russia loses High Court battle with Commonwealth over Canberra embassy site, but will be compensated

Elizabeth Byrne - 12 November 2025

Russia has lost its battle with the federal government over a site for a new embassy in Canberra but the Commonwealth will have to compensate the federation for revoking the lease on the site.

The lease was granted to Russia in 2008, but was withdrawn when parliament passed a new law in 2023, citing advice from ASIO that the planned embassy could pose a threat to national security.

Lawyers for Russia argued the law was invalid because it was not supported by the constitution, and the act did not state the reason for the termination.

Today, the High Court found the new law was valid, but Russia was entitled to compensation.

National security threat

In 2008, Russia was granted a lease on the land after paying a one-off premium of nearly $3 million.

Russia wanted a new embassy to replace the crumbling buildings it had occupied for decades at a site just down the road.

The new block was in a prime position in what is known as the dress circle of embassies around Parliament House.

But no real work was started for a long time.

Russia cited a dispute with a builder and COVID-19 as impediments to getting the project off the ground.

In the end, the National Capital Authority (NCA) stepped in, trying to revoke the lease.

That generated a tricky diplomatic situation, and court action.

Ultimately, Russia won its challenge in the Federal Court.

But it all ended when parliament rushed through a law revoking the lease.

At the time, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said there had been advice from security agencies that the siting of the embassy was potentially a national security threat.

It was that act that prompted the High Court challenge, with lawyers for Russia arguing the law was unconstitutional.

But the Commonwealth said there was support to make such a law within the constitution, especially in the circumstances.

Russia also argued if it lost the High Court case, it should be entitled to compensation.

Russia had done some site works and there was one building on the site at the time of the law passing.

In 2023, after the law was passed, one Russian embassy member refused to leave for some time, taking up residence on the site, to prevent Australian authorities from moving in.

In a statement, Attorney-General Michelle Rowland re-emphasised the government's position.

"Australia will always stand up for our values and we will stand up for our national security," Ms Rowland said.

"The government welcomes the High Court's decision that found the government acted lawfully in terminating the Russian Embassy's lease.

"The government will closely consider the next steps in light of the court's decision."

The Russian Embassy in Australia said it was studying the judgment.

"The Russian side will carefully study the text of the court ruling, which sets a precedent," an embassy official said in a statement.

The future use of the site is unclear with the NCA saying it was a matter for government.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-11-12/russia-loses-high-court-battle-over-canberra-embassy-site/105999328

https://www.hcourt.gov.au/cases-and-judgments/judgments/judgments-1998-current/government-russian-federation-v-commonwealth-australia-0

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122516

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23843559 (120924ZNOV25) Notable: Video: Spy chief warns of China espionage threat to business, critical infrastructure - ASIO director-general Mike Burgess says Chinese state-backed hackers are attempting to infiltrate Australia’s critical infrastructure, warning the nation has now crossed the threshold for “high-impact sabotage”. Addressing an ASIC forum, he cited Chinese groups Salt Typhoon and Volt Typhoon probing telecommunications, water, transport and energy networks to gain persistent, undetected access. Burgess said one nation-state – “no prizes for guessing which one” – had repeatedly scanned Australian systems, mirroring activity seen in the US territory of Guam where hackers positioned for potential disruption. He warned that a foreign actor could “turn off telecommunications… or cripple our financial system”, estimating espionage cost the economy $12.5 billion last financial year. Burgess urged companies to harden defences, saying rising grievance and conspiracy movements were also driving greater extremism risks.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122389

>>122489

>>122494

>>122504

Spy chief warns of China espionage threat to business, critical infrastructure

Olivia Caisley - 12 Novemner 2025

Australia's top intelligence chief has accused Chinese state-backed hackers of attempting to infiltrate the nation's critical infrastructure and telecommunications networks, warning that great-power competition is fuelling "unprecedented levels of espionage" that cost the economy an estimated $12.5 billion in 2023-24.

Addressing a business forum in Melbourne on Wednesday, ASIO director-general Mike Burgess said Australia had entered an era of "strategic surprise and security fragility" and was bracing for major disruption.

"I have previously said we're getting closer to the threshold for high-impact sabotage," Mr Burgess told an Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) forum in Melbourne on Wednesday.

"Well, I regret to inform you — we're there now."

Mr Burgess cited Chinese hacking groups Salt Typhoon and Volt Typhoon, which have targeted telecommunications networks in Australia and the United States.

Referring to Volt Typhoon's campaign against networks supporting the US military presence in Guam, he said the hackers compromised American critical infrastructure networks to pre-position for potential sabotage.

"The penetrations gave China the ability to turn off telecommunications and other critical infrastructure," he said.

"And yes, we have seen Chinese hackers probing our critical infrastructure as well."

While not naming Beijing directly, Mr Burgess made another apparent reference to China, saying he was aware of "one nation state — no prizes for guessing which one — conducting multiple attempts to scan and penetrate critical infrastructure in Australia and other Five Eyes countries".

Mr Burgess said the attempts had targeted water, transport, telecommunications and energy networks, describing the activity as "highly sophisticated" and designed to gain persistent, undetected access to systems.

"And when they have penetrated your networks, they actively and aggressively map your systems, and seek to maintain persistent undetected access that enables them to conduct sabotage at a time and moment of their choosing."

His comments echo recent warnings from US and UK intelligence agencies about Chinese cyber groups attempting to seed access across Western critical infrastructure.

He warned that Australians may not yet grasp the scale of the threat.

"I do not think we — and I mean all of us — truly appreciate how disruptive, how devastating, this could be," he said.

Business data threat

Mr Burgess urged business leaders to harden their systems and protect sensitive data, saying the prospect of foreign-driven infrastructure disruption "keeps [him] up at night".

"The loss of availability in any part of our critical infrastructure can be devastating," he said.

"That's one phone network not working for less than one day.

"Imagine the implications if a nation-state took down all the networks? Or turned off the power during a heatwave? Or polluted our drinking water? Or crippled our financial system?"

Mr Burgess said the scenarios were not hypothetical, with state actors actively exploring sabotage options to steal intellectual property, undermine companies for strategic advantage, cause chaos during elections or major national decisions, or hinder Australia's ability to support allies in conflict scenarios.

He said it was imperative for businesses to protect their data.

"Some of the scenarios the Australian Institute of Criminology modelled for our Cost of Espionage report were eye-opening and eye-watering," he said.

"The cyber-enabled sabotage of critical infrastructure will cost the economy $1.1 billion per incident.

"An economy-wide, week-long disruption will cost $6 billion."

Mr Burgess also warned that espionage was just part of a rapidly evolving threat landscape.

Rising anti-authority sentiment, conspiracy movements and ideological extremism, he said, were increasing the likelihood of politically motivated violence and terrorism.

"Growing levels of grievance, conspiracy and anti-authority beliefs are driving spikes in politically motivated violence and making acts of terrorism more likely," he said.

"They are behaving more aggressively, more recklessly, more dangerously. More willing to engage in what we call 'high harm' activities."

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-11-12/spy-chief-warns-of-china-espionage-threat-to-business/105999522

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Baqxl5QHbeY

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122517

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23843570 (120927ZNOV25) Notable: Video: Chinese state-backed hackers a rising, aggressive threat, ASIO chief Mike Burgess says - ASIO director-general Mike Burgess has warned business leaders that Chinese state-sponsored hackers are driving a new wave of espionage and cyber sabotage targeting Australia’s critical infrastructure. Speaking at ASIC’s annual forum, he said “we’re there now” on the threshold of high-impact sabotage, with hostile actors probing water, transport, telecommunications and energy networks to gain persistent, hidden access. Burgess cited groups Salt Typhoon and Volt Typhoon as operating for Chinese intelligence and the military. He said espionage cost Australia billions, including $2bn in stolen trade secrets each year, and warned that attacks could “cripple our financial system” or “turn off the power during a heatwave”. Burgess urged companies to fix known vulnerabilities, noting 99 per cent of intrusions exploit existing weaknesses.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122389

>>122489

>>122494

>>122504

>>122516

Chinese state-backed hackers a rising, aggressive threat, ASIO chief Mike Burgess says

BEN PACKHAM - 12 November 2025

ASIO boss Mike Burgess has warned business leaders they are facing a new and aggressive wave of corporate espionage and cyber-enabled sabotage, with Chinese state-sponsored hackers leading the push to infiltrate critical systems.

In a speech to ASIC’s annual forum in Melbourne, the Director-General of Security said company chiefs needed to do better in protecting their cyber networks and the nation’s critical infrastructure systems to avoid massive costs and disruption of essential services.

He revealed new modelling by the Australian Institute of Criminology had estimated the cost of a single cyber sabotage incident on a critical infrastructure network at about $1.1bn, while an estimated $2bn worth of trade secrets were stolen from Australian companies each year.

“Great power competition is driving unprecedented levels of espionage. A range of countries – some we consider friendly – have a relentless hunger for strategic advantage and an insatiable appetite for inside information,” Mr Burgess said.

“They are aggressively targeting private-sector projects, negotiations and investments that might give foreign companies a commercial advantage. And, like criminals, they have been aggressively targeting customer data.”

He said cyber sabotage was posing a new and urgent threat, accelerated by artificial intelligence and a profusion of new hacking tools available for sale or hire.

“I have previously said we’re getting closer to the threshold for high-impact sabotage. Well, I regret to inform you, we’re there now,” Mr Burgess said.

“Authoritarian regimes are growing more willing to disrupt or destroy critical infrastructure to impede decision-making, damage the economy, undermine war-fighting capability and sow social discord.

“They see sabotage as a tool of coercion, disruption, distraction and retaliation to test national resolve, readiness and responses.”

In a clear reference to China, Mr Burgess said: “ASIO is aware of one nation state – no prizes for guessing which one – conducting multiple attempts to scan and penetrate critical infrastructure in Australia and other Five Eyes countries, targeting water, transport, telecommunications and energy networks.

“The reconnaissance is highly sophisticated, using top-notch tradecraft to find your networks, test for vulnerabilities, knock on digital doors and check the digital locks.

“And when they have penetrated your networks, they actively and aggressively map your systems, and seek to maintain persistent undetected access that enables them to conduct sabotage at a time and moment of their choosing.”

He said the Salt Typhoon and Volt Typhoon hacking groups, which had been publicly identified after multiple attacks on US critical infrastructure providers, were “working for Chinese government intelligence and their military”.

“Imagine the implications if a nation state took down all the networks? Or turned off the power during a heatwave? Or polluted our drinking water? Or crippled our financial system?” he said.

“I assure you, these are not hypotheticals – foreign governments have elite teams investigating these possibilities right now.

“There are multiple scenarios where a nation state’s intent could shift from stealing and meddling to disruption and damage.”

Mr Burgess said recent cyber attacks against Australian companies included the breach of a major exporter’s computer system by “nation-state hackers” that “gave the foreign country a significant advantage in subsequent contract negotiations”.

“In another case, they stole the blueprints of an Australian innovation and mass-produced cheap knock-offs that nearly bankrupted the innovator.”

He said foreign companies connected to intelligence services had also sought to buy sensitive data sets, secure land near important military sites, and collaborate with researchers working on sensitive technology.

Mr Burgess said 99 per cent of cyber security attacks exploited a known system vulnerability.

“Boards need to be curious and discerning about the information provided to them. You can’t PowerPoint your way out of this risk. Don’t let management do that to you,” he said.

“And as I said earlier, we have now reached the threshold for high-impact sabotage. Once someone has access to your network, what they do next is a matter of intent, not capability.”

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/chinese-statebacked-hackers-a-rising-aggressive-threat-asio-chief-mike-burgess-says/news-story/5231136fc60a8c50b773bc1d83fc02e8

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_MSsarDKwC8

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122518

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23847758 (130908ZNOV25) Notable: Video: New Epstein emails allege Donald Trump 'knew about the girls - Newly released emails from Jeffrey Epstein to Ghislaine Maxwell and author Michael Wolff have intensified scrutiny of Donald Trump’s past association with the disgraced financier, though the documents do not allege wrongdoing by the US President. Democrats released more than 20,000 estate documents, including a 2011 claim that Virginia Giuffre “spent hours” at Epstein’s home with Trump and a 2019 message asserting Trump “knew about the girls”. The White House condemned the release as a partisan hit, insisting Trump expelled Epstein from Mar-a-Lago and “did nothing wrong”. The timing coincides with a bipartisan House push to force the public release of all Epstein files after a petition reached 218 signatures.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122400

>>122437

>>122446

>>122447

New Epstein emails allege Donald Trump 'knew about the girls'

JOE KELLY - 13 November 2025

1/2

Convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein mentioned Donald Trump multiple times in emails to Ghislaine Maxwell, as well as to journalist and author Michael Wolff, suggesting the US President “knew about the girls”.

The documents, released by the Democrats, do not suggest wrongdoing on the part of the President, but contain a 2011 claim from Epstein that Mr Trump spent hours at his house with one of the disgraced financier’s victims, whose identity was confirmed by House Republicans as Virginia Giuffre – one of Epstein’s leading accusers who committed suicide earlier this year.

In one email to Wolff shared by Democrats and dated January 31, 2019, Epstein allegedly wrote: “Trump said he asked me to resign, never a member ever ... of course he knew about the girls as he asked ghislaine to stop.”

In another message, from April 2011, Epstein told Maxwell: “I want you to realise that that dog that hasn’t barked is Trump.”

He added that an unnamed victim “spent hours at my house with him ,, he has never once been mentioned. police chief. etc. im 75 % there.”

Maxwell replied: “I have been thinking about that...”

The documents were among more than 20,000 provided by Epstein’s estate to congress and released by Democrats on the House oversight committee, pushing the relationship between the US President and the disgraced financier back into the spotlight. Epstein took his own life in August 2019.

Trump ‘did nothing wrong’

Responding to the release of the emails, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said Democrats had “selectively leaked emails to the liberal media to create a fake narrative to smear President Trump”.

“Jeffrey Epstein was a member at Mar-a-Lago until President Trump kicked him out because Jeffrey Epstein was a pedophile and he was a creep,” Ms Leavitt said.

“These emails prove absolutely nothing other than the fact that President Trump did nothing wrong.

“These stories are nothing more than bad-faith efforts to distract from President Trump’s historic accomplishments, and any American with common sense sees right through this hoax and clear distraction from the government opening back up again.”

President blasts Epstein ‘hoax’

Mr Trump responded to the release of the emails by taking aim at his political opponents, warning that the Democrats were “trying to bring up the Jeffrey Epstein Hoax again because they’ll do anything at all to deflect on how badly they’ve done on the shutdown, and so many other subjects”.

“Only a very bad, or stupid, Republican would fall into that trap,” he said. “The Democrats cost our country $1.5 trillion dollars with their recent antics of viciously closing our country, while at the same time putting many at risk – and they should pay a fair price.

“There should be no deflections to Epstein or anything else, and any Republicans involved should be focused only on opening up our country, and fixing the massive damage caused by the Democrats!”

Attention shifts as shutdown ends

The latest revelations come as the end of the government shutdown allows attention to shift to efforts under way in the House of Representatives that would force the Department of Justice to release all of the Epstein files.

Newly elected Democratic Adelita Grijalva provided the 218th and final signature needed for a petition championed by Republican Thomas Massie and Democrat Ro Khanna to trigger the release.

The shutdown has meant Ms Grijalva, who was sworn in on Wednesday local time (Thursday AEDT), has been forced to wait nearly 50 days to take her seat in congress, with House Speaker Mike Johnson trying to delay a battle that will see GOP members defecting to support the release of the Epstein files.

Before signing the petition on Wednesday, Ms Grijalva said that “justice cannot wait another day” and argued that “Trump knew more about Epstein’s abuses than he previously acknowledged.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122519

File: 2ccc7dcea77659e⋯.jpg (1.03 MB,4180x2858,2090:1429,Clipboard.jpg)

File: e2b0e62d29e2051⋯.png (241.32 KB,2550x3369,850:1123,Clipboard.png)

File: 65ec84dbf8bcb66⋯.jpg (1.31 MB,4252x5575,4252:5575,Clipboard.jpg)

File: 192175b98318096⋯.jpg (216.57 KB,1368x1807,1368:1807,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23847817 (130930ZNOV25) Notable: ‘The photo of Andrew and Giuffre was real,’ Epstein emails suggest - Newly released US House Oversight Committee emails appear to contradict Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor’s claim that the photograph of him with 17-year-old Virginia Giuffre may have been faked. In a 2011 message to journalist Michael Wolff, Jeffrey Epstein allegedly wrote: “Yes she was on my plane, and yes she had her picture taken with Andrew,” shortly after Giuffre’s identity became public. Other emails show Andrew privately telling Epstein “I can’t take any more of this my end” as the scandal intensified. The tranche, subpoenaed from the Epstein estate, also includes Epstein claiming Giuffre “spent several hours” with Donald Trump, prompting the White House to accuse Democrats of pushing a contrived narrative. Further exchanges show Epstein, Maxwell and Andrew coordinating media strategy, while Epstein thanks Lord Mandelson, the former UK ambassador to the US, for advice on distancing himself from the prince.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122518

‘The photo of Andrew and Giuffre was real,’ Epstein emails suggest

Emails show Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor telling Jeffrey Epstein he ‘can’t take any more of this’ as the scandal began to engulf the royal family

Josie Ensor and George Greenwood - November 12 2025

1/2

A photograph of Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor with his arm around 17-year-old Virginia Roberts Giuffre was real, according to newly-released emails sent by Jeffrey Epstein, which undermine Andrew’s claim it may have been faked.

Andrew claimed in his interview on Newsnight in 2019 that he had no recollection of the infamous photograph ever being taken and suggested it may have been doctored.

But a tranche of emails published by the US House Oversight Committee on Wednesday appears to undermine his claims. In a 2011 email, Epstein, who is alleged to have taken the picture, appeared to tell a journalist: “Yes she [Giuffre] was on my plane, and yes she had her picture taken with Andrew.”

The email was sent shortly after Giuffre’s identity was made public in a British newspaper, which also published the photograph of her with Andrew and Ghislaine Maxwell, Epstein’s accomplice.

The documents also seem to show that Andrew told Epstein “I can’t take any more of this my end”, as the scandal began to engulf the royal family. Andrew has strenuously denied allegations of any wrongdoing.

The emails were obtained from the Epstein estate, which was subpoenaed for its records over the summer.

The three emails released by the Democrats seem to show Epstein claiming a victim — later identified as Giuffre — “spent several hours” with Trump at Epstein’s residence.

In response, Karoline Leavitt, the White House press secretary, said: “The Democrats selectively leaked emails to the liberal media to create a fake narrative to smear President Trump. The ‘unnamed victim’ referenced in these emails is the late Virginia Giuffre, who repeatedly said President Trump was not involved in any wrongdoing whatsoever and ‘couldn’t have been friendlier’ to her in their limited interactions.

“The fact remains that President Trump kicked Jeffrey Epstein out of his club decades ago for being a creep to his female employees, including Giuffre.

“These stories are nothing more than bad-faith efforts to distract from President Trump’s historic accomplishments, and any American with common sense sees right through this hoax and clear distraction from the government opening back up again.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122520

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23847844 (130945ZNOV25) Notable: Video: Neo-Nazi leader Thomas Sewell granted bail after alleged attack on Indigenous camp - Neo-Nazi Thomas Sewell has been granted Supreme Court bail on strict conditions despite facing more than 20 charges over an alleged violent August 31 attack on Camp Sovereignty in Melbourne’s Kings Domain. Prosecutors allege Sewell personally led about 30 National Socialist Network members into the Indigenous camp, shouting “let’s get them”, before multiple victims were kicked, punched, or struck with poles. Police say one woman suffered a nasal fracture, another required seven staples, and missiles were discharged. The defence argued Sewell risked spending longer on remand than any future sentence, noting all 14 co-accused were bailed. Justice James Elliott found the prosecution had not shown Sewell posed an unacceptable risk, granting bail with a $20,000 surety, curfew, reporting conditions, and bans on entering Melbourne’s CBD or Kings Domain.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122149

>>122150

>>122188

>>122189

>>122234

Neo-Nazi leader Thomas Sewell granted bail after alleged attack on Indigenous camp

Erin Pearson - November 13, 2025

1/2

Neo-Nazi Thomas Sewell will be released back into the community to live in a share house with family and friends, but banned from entering Melbourne’s CBD, after successfully taking his bid for bail to the Supreme Court of Victoria.

The 32-year-old is facing more than 20 charges over his alleged involvement in a violent attack at Camp Sovereignty, in Melbourne’s Kings Domain, on August 31.

Police have charged 14 adults and one child with violence-related offences over the incident. Some 35 witnesses are expected to be called at an upcoming court hearing.

On Wednesday, Sewell – who leads the National Socialist Network – arrived at the Supreme Court of Victoria in a prison van before being ushered into court where 10 people, including his partner, appeared in support.

He held up a handwritten, white supremacist note with his left hand, against a book on “viking lore” poetry, while entering through the court laneway.

In opposing bail, Crown Prosecutor Erik Dober said there had been an escalation in Sewell’s offending this year. Police alleged that he personally led “the charge” of about 30 people into Camp Sovereignty and told the group “let’s get them” before at least seven people were assaulted in some way.

“Two NSN members held down a Camp Sovereignty occupant while another member kicked the victim. Another victim was struck with a pole and kicked and punched to the body,” Dober said.

Dober also said that another victim, a woman, was thrown to the ground and punched in the face and body, causing a bruised left eye and nasal fracture. Another woman was allegedly thrown to the ground and kicked to the back of head and requiring seven staples in her scalp.

“A sixth victim … was hit with a flag pole. Then, among this, five NSN members discharged missiles.”

Dober alleged Sewell had personally punched and kicked two victims, before being pulled away by his supporters.

The prosecution conceded some charges might not proceed to trial, depending on decisions made by the Office of Public Prosecutions.

In arguing for bail, defence barrister Dermot Dann, KC, raised issues with the police charges.

He said any future trial would likely be up to two years away. His client was at risk of spending more time on remand than any future sentence.

Dann also called for parity with Sewell’s 14 co-accused who were all released on bail, including 29-year-old Jaeden Johnson who has prior convictions for violent crimes.

Dann said that Sewell had a job offer to work as a roof plumber’s assistant if bailed, and the support of his partner, and new accommodation for his family.

“He is now in solitary confinement … because of his so-called high-profile nature … to avoid potential conflict [in custody],” Dann said.

The maximum penalty for violent disorder is 10 years’ jail.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80e470 No.122521

File: d56a48a0ce9cba0⋯.jpg (144.64 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clipboard.jpg)

File: f747f6380473e3e⋯.jpg (44.04 KB,600x501,200:167,Clipboard.jpg)

Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23847859 (130956ZNOV25) Notable: Beijing gets personal with Australia’s ‘irresponsible’ ASIO chief Mike Burgess - China has launched an unusually direct attack on ASIO director-general Mike Burgess after he warned that Chinese state-backed hackers had probed Australian critical infrastructure. Beijing’s foreign ministry accused Burgess of “repeatedly hurling attacks at China”, “spreading disinformation” and “deliberately sowing division”, urging him to stop making “irresponsible statements”. Chinese state media amplified the denunciation, with Beijing-aligned academics claiming ASIO was “ideology-driven” and engaged in “baseless smears”. Burgess, backed by both major parties, recently warned that Chinese groups such as Salt Typhoon and Volt Typhoon had attempted to map and infiltrate water, transport, telecommunications and energy networks. The clash follows years of escalating espionage concerns and high-level efforts, including clandestine meetings in Beijing, to curb China’s activity.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>>122489

>>122494

>>122504

>>122516

>>122517

Beijing gets personal with Australia’s ‘irresponsible’ ASIO chief Mike Burgess

WILL GLASGOW - 13 November 2025

Beijing has made an unusually personal attack on ASIO head Mike Burgess following accusations from the spy boss that Chinese hacking groups have tried to infiltrate sensitive infrastructure networks in Australia.

China’s foreign ministry on Wednesday evening led the scolding, saying the head of Australia’s intelligence collection agency had “repeatedly hurled attacks at China” and “deliberately sowed division and confrontation”.

This was then amplified by Beijing-affiliated experts who told Chinese state media that ASIO had “long been driven by ideology” and repeatedly engaged in “baseless smears” on China.

It came a week after Mr Burgess told an audience at the Lowy Institute that after he had previously spoken publicly about China’s malign behaviour in Australia, Beijing’s representative had complained to members of the Albanese government but never to him directly.

China’s government took a different approach on Wednesday evening when asked about the spy chief’s comments about Chinese hacking networks.

“In recent months, the Australian official you mentioned has repeatedly hurled attacks at China, spread disinformation and deliberately sowed division and confrontation,” said Chinese foreign ministry spokesman Guo Jiakun.

“China firmly opposes it and has protested with Australia. It’s hoped that the Australian official can stop making irresponsible statements and do more things conducive to the healthy development of China-Australia relations.”

Mr Burgess, who has wide cross-party support in Canberra, was appointed to head ASIO by then prime minister Scott Morrison in 2019. In 2024, he was reappointed for a second five-year term by the Albanese government, which noted his “extraordinary contribution to Australia’s national security”.

The ASIO chief and the leaders of other Five Eyes intelligence agencies have struggled to find ways to reduce China’s often brazen espionage activities.

In mid-2023, Mr Burgess made a clandestine trip to Beijing to speak directly to Chinese spy chiefs before a visit by Prime Minister Anthony Albanese in November. The then head of the CIA, Bill Burns, held a similar meeting in the first half of 2023.

In subsequent public addresses, Mr Burgess has made clear that Chinese activity has continued and has become increasingly sophisticated.

“ASIO is aware of one nation state – no prizes for guessing which one – conducting multiple attempts to scan and penetrate critical infrastructure in Australia and other Five Eyes countries, targeting water, transport, telecommunications and energy networks,” Mr Burgess told a business audience on Wednesday.

“And when they have penetrated your networks, they actively and aggressively map your systems, and seek to maintain persistent undetected access that enables them to conduct sabotage at a time and moment of their choosing.”

In addition to that barely veiled warning, the spy chief noted the activities of China’s Salt Typhoon and Volt Typhoon hacking groups, which have made multiple publicly identified attacks on US critical infrastructure. “And, yes, we have seen Chinese hackers probing our critical infrastructure as well,” he noted.

Among those in Chinese state media criticising Mr Burgess’s latest comments on China was Chen Hong, director of the Australia Studies Centre at East China Normal University, who was denied a visa to enter Australia in 2020 following advice from ASIO. Professor Chen has not visited Australia since.

“Australia’s intelligence agency has long been driven by ideology, repeatedly engaging in baseless smears and attacks against China,” Professor Chen told the Global Times.

China’s spy agencies have also increased their disclosures to the Chinese public in recent years. Beijing’s powerful Ministry of State Security has launched its own channel on the ubiquitous social media app WeChat to warn citizens about foreign espionage activities.

The security agency has also recently created an AI-generated anchor who appears in full MSS uniform to deliver cautionary tales about Chinese citizens who were duped into sharing China’s state secrets.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/beijing-gets-personal-with-australias-irresponsible-asio-chief-mike-burgess/news-story/a509bbe3d7b81f7e0180f3d3f42f1fd7

https://www.fmprc.gov.cn/mfa_eng/xw/fyrbt/202511/t20251112_11751644.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.



[Return][Go to top][Catalog][Nerve Center][Random][Post a Reply]
[]
[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ r8k / ck / wooo / fit / random / biz / cow / eots / fiobr / gigacube / lathe / lumidor / nand ]