d8af2a No.19 [Last 50 Posts]
/qresearch/ Australia
Re-Posts of notables
____________________________
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50707
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22645579 (240938ZFEB25) Notable: Video: Fake terror, real fear, and hunt for puppetmaster behind anti-Semitic attacks - All 14 of the alleged offenders arrested over a streak of anti-Semitic crimes have now been charged after it was revealed an organised crime kingpin directed a cabal of Australia-based criminals to orchestrate a raft of attacks now labelled a “fabricated terror plot”. On Monday, the 14 alleged offenders were arrested after eleven simultaneous police raids, with five people charged from the outset. By Tuesday morning, all had been charged with a total of 65 alleged offences, though the supposed kingpin behind the scheme is believed to have evaded arrest so far. The alleged mastermind “pulled the strings” on a spate of Sydney’s anti-Semitic attacks from “afar”, understood to be while based on foreign soil, and had sought to leverage information about an abandoned explosives-laden caravan with police to secure leniency in a separate criminal case. The charges came after dawn raids by NSW Police and Australian Federal Police, who arrested 14 people in relation to a string of the anti-Semitic vandalism and firebombing attacks - bringing the total number of people arrested under state police’s hate-crimes unit to 29 with a total of 143 charges laid. NSW Premier Chris Minns had first labelled the caravan as a potential “mass-casualty event” and “terrorism”. Police have now called it a “criminal con job” and “fabricated terror plot” in a foiled attempt for criminals to use as a bartering tool to reduce their sentences or drop charges. It follows a summer of rising anti-Semitism in NSW, but with police now alleging that the most severe cases had their roots in the sophisticated criminal plot.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>>/qresearch/22225665 (pb)
>>>/qresearch/22617503 (pb)
Sheik Ibrahim Dadoun says Mossad ‘manufactured’ Australia’s anti-Semitism crisis
ALEXI DEMETRIADI - 23 February 2025
1/2
A prominent Sydney sheik has claimed there was a real possibility Australia’s violent wave of anti-Semitism had been “manufactured” by Israel’s intelligence agency, Mossad.
The claim by Sheik Ibrahim Dadoun – until recently a director at the country’s peak Muslim body – comes after ASIO director-general Mike Burgess warned about hostile foreign states operating in Australia and said he had “grave concerns” that anti-Semitism was a hatred that defied logic and was likely to get worse.
“When will the ASIO boss tell Australians if the Mossad had anything to do with the wave of manufactured anti-Semitic attacks conducted by known criminals,” the sheik told his supporters on the weekend.
“If it (the attacks) were Iran, it would have been plastered all over the news. If it was China we would have known about it.”
The sheik also claimed Mr Burgess believed the “hostile states” could be allies or friends to Australia who wanted to intervene in domestic politics and “affect social cohesion”.
“Given that Israel is seen as a ‘friend’ to Australia, it is highly likely, in fact plausible, and a real possibility that Mossad manufactured (the) wave of anti-Semitic attacks,” Sheik Dadoun said.
Although far-left pro-Palestine activists and radical fringe preachers have told their social media followers Australia’s anti-Semitic attacks were co-ordinated by Israel, it is the first time a relatively mainstream Muslim leader has made that claim.
Despite having no intelligence to back up his Mossad claim, Sheik Dadoun called on Mr Burgess to “disclose” what he knew about the anti-Semitic attacks.
“For now, it is highly likely that this (Mossad’s ‘manufactured’ anti-Semitic attacks) is the scenario authorities are dealing with in Australia,” he said.
The sheik was a director at the Australian National Imams Council until late 2024, but still works for the United Muslims of Australia, which The Australian revealed had until 2023 enlisted the services of a prominent Hizb ut-Tahrir activist, a group Sheik Dadoun has himself been associated with.
The sheik’s Mossad comments come after Mr Burgess last week said “hostile nations” could be using domestic criminals to advance their own strategic interests, amid a possible overlap with recent anti-Semitic attacks and after the Australian Federal Police said in January it was investigating information that led to a similar belief.
Speaking to The Australian on Friday, the ASIO chief said anti-Semitism was a form of hate that defied logic, was un-Australian and likely to get worse, and on Wednesday said: “ASIO investigations have identified at least three different countries plotting to physically harm people living in Australia. In a small number of cases, we held grave fears for the life of the person being targeted.”
Although Mr Burgess said ASIO was targeting foreign interference, he did not suggest “friendly nations” had been behind Australia’s violent anti-Semitism wave.
The Australian revealed in January how two men arrested by NSW Police’s anti-Semitism strike force for a botched arson attack in Bondi last year had been paid and co-ordinated by an Australia-based criminal known only as “James Bond”.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50708
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22645621 (240958ZFEB25) Notable: Video: Monique Ryan, husband apologise after he is filmed removing Liberal sign - Teal MP Monique Ryan and her husband Peter Jordan have apologised after he was filmed removing a sign backing local Liberal candidate Amelia Hamer, marking the highest profile incident in a tit-for-tat signage war in the battleground seat of Kooyong. Videos obtained by this masthead show two youths slashing a Liberal sign to “humiliate” a homeowner while Ryan posters have been defaced with markers as the increasingly intense contest defies the affluent east Melbourne seat’s genteel character and some incidents end up in court. Ryan, who campaigned on restoring integrity to politics, and her husband both apologised for his behaviour on Saturday. “I unreservedly apologise for removing the sign,” Jordan said in a statement after video of the encounter was revealed by The Age and The Sydney Morning Herald on Monday. “It was a mistake. I believed the sign was illegally placed but should have reported my concerns to council.” The footage of Jordan shows the MP’s husband walking briskly away with Hamer’s placard under his arm down a street in Camberwell as the person filming asks a series of questions. “I’m taking the sign down,” Jordan says in the video. When asked why, he says: “it’s on public land”. Jordan is asked repeatedly who he is by the man filming, who notes Jordan is wearing a teal shirt underneath his jumper. “I’m not saying who I am,” Jordan responds. At one point, the man attempts to take the sign away from Jordan on the basis that it remains his property. Jordan pulls it back, saying: “if it goes back up, it’ll be taken down again”. “It’s an illegally put up sign, anyone can take [it] down because it’s illegal.” Jordan, who is an executive at a medical device company, eventually surrenders the sign. Ryan echoed her husband’s apology for removing the sign. “It should not have happened,” she said. “All concerns around signage should be reported to council.”
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Dutton leads, Labor on course for election defeat according to shock poll
David Crowe - February 23, 2025
1/2
Voters have lifted Opposition Leader Peter Dutton to a significant new lead in the race for power at the federal election, backing him as a strong leader while slashing their core support for Labor to a new low of 25 per cent.
The shift has taken the Coalition to a lead of 55 per cent in two-party terms when Australians are asked how they would allocate their preferences on their ballot papers, driving Labor to just 45 per cent and putting it on course for defeat.
In a warning sign for Prime Minister Anthony Albanese, an exclusive survey also shows that 59 per cent of voters say the good news for the government last week – when the Reserve Bank cut interest rates – will not change their vote.
The survey, conducted for this masthead by research company Resolve Strategic, finds that 43 per cent of voters consider Albanese and Labor to be weak, while 22 per cent say the same for Dutton and the Coalition.
Asked which side offered strong leadership, 37 per cent name Dutton and the Coalition while 24 per cent name Albanese and Labor, a turnaround from when the prime minister led on this question one year ago.
The Opposition Leader also has a significant lead when voters are asked to name the party and leader who was best able to deal with United States President Donald Trump, with 34 per cent preferring Dutton and the Coalition compared to 18 per cent who favour Albanese and Labor.
Dutton leads as preferred prime minister for the second consecutive month, ahead by 39 per cent to 35 per cent against Albanese, although 26 per cent of voters are undecided on this question.
Resolve director Jim Reed said the two-party result suggested the Coalition was in a stronger position to win the election in its own right, or by gaining support in a hung parliament.
“I think the swing is on, with both the declining primary vote and preference flows for Labor reflecting where people are at right now,” he said.
“The public mood has lifted after the rate cut, but it has not led to any increase in support for the government.”
The Resolve Political Monitor surveyed 1506 eligible voters from Tuesday to Sunday, a period that included the Reserve Bank decision and Labor’s rescue package for steelworkers in Whyalla, although most of the survey was completed before the government announced $8.5 billion for Medicare on Sunday – a move quickly matched by the Coalition.
Core support for the Greens was unchanged at 13 per cent, while support for Pauline Hanson’s One Nation rose from 7 to 9 per cent and the independents slipped from 10 to 9 per cent. The results have a margin of error of 2.5 percentage points.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50709
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22645634 (241010ZFEB25) Notable: Video: ASIO warns bikies, organised crime linked to antisemitism, hostile nations - Australia’s spy agency is targeting figures linked to organised crime and outlaw bikie gangs as it combats antisemitic attacks and plots by hostile nations to harm national security. The revelation by ASIO director-general Mike Burgess that the underworld is now in his sights marks a dramatic pivot for the domestic security agency. Historically, ASIO has focused on extremism and espionage, but it is now dealing with an increasing overlap between profit-driven criminal entities and those seeking to undermine Australian interests or community cohesion for political, strategic or other gain. Burgess said he had “grave concerns” that unnamed hostile states were using bikies or other crime groups in Australia to advance their strategic interests. In a warning to the criminal world that ASIO was now pursuing some of its members, Burgess told this masthead and 60 Minutes: “I would never have imagined that outlaw motorcycle gangs would be on our target list. “If you [gangland figures] are tasked by someone from overseas, and you’re a criminal and you’re doing that for a fee and it is a threat to security, then ASIO will be on your case. I reckon that’s going to be a problem for you.”
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>>/qresearch/22617503 (pb)
>>50707
ASIO warns bikies, organised crime linked to antisemitism, hostile nations
Nick McKenzie, Chris Vedelago and Perry Duffin - February 22, 2025
1/2
Australia’s spy agency is targeting figures linked to organised crime and outlaw bikie gangs as it combats antisemitic attacks and plots by hostile nations to harm national security.
The revelation by ASIO director-general Mike Burgess that the underworld is now in his sights marks a dramatic pivot for the domestic security agency.
Historically, ASIO has focused on extremism and espionage, but it is now dealing with an increasing overlap between profit-driven criminal entities and those seeking to undermine Australian interests or community cohesion for political, strategic or other gain.
Burgess said he had “grave concerns” that unnamed hostile states were using bikies or other crime groups in Australia to advance their strategic interests.
In a warning to the criminal world that ASIO was now pursuing some of its members, Burgess told this masthead and 60 Minutes: “I would never have imagined that outlaw motorcycle gangs would be on our target list.
“If you [gangland figures] are tasked by someone from overseas, and you’re a criminal and you’re doing that for a fee and it is a threat to security, then ASIO will be on your case. I reckon that’s going to be a problem for you.”
The decision by ASIO to make public its widening investigative focus has been sparked by two areas of concern for state and federal agencies: criminal entities being asked by hostile foreign state actors to target dissidents or carry out other attacks on domestic security; and the suspected involvement of gangland figures of varying seniority in antisemitic arson attacks.
Officers from Victoria’s Counter-Terrorism Command continue to investigate the firebombing of the Adass Israel synagogue in Ripponlea by masked suspects who remain at large.
This masthead can reveal Victorian authorities are investigating whether the firebombing of the synagogue in December was carried out using the same gangland infrastructure utilised in some of the tobacco war arson attacks.
The tobacco war arson attacks have typically been outsourced to lowly foot soldiers via encrypted communications channels and other methodology that have made it difficult for authorities to trace the puppet masters.
In NSW, official sources confirmed evidence gathered so far has not implicated terrorists in any antisemitic incidents. Investigators are continuing to probe whether those behind the so-called caravan plot were seeking to gain a personal advantage, such as creating a scenario in which they could trade information with police in return for a benefit.
While no agency is yet willing to definitely rule out violent extremism as a motive in the caravan plot, there is growing consensus among security officials that early descriptions of the caravan plot as a “potential mass casualty event” were overblown.
Officials have assessed the two NSW residents who acquired the caravan as petty criminals with no terrorist motivation, while another suspect in the supply chain has links to the Jewish community which suggest he, too, had no motive beyond payment.
But there are also links to Sydney’s gangland: a suspect named on a search warrant has separately been accused of supplying stolen cars to the underworld.
Asked if his warning to the criminal world was driven by police intelligence that antisemitic incidents might be directed by organised crime associated entities, Burgess declined to comment on specific investigations but said he was “sending a message” to criminals that “if you’re involved in this, we’ll be on your case”.
“I can assure you, if you are in such an organisation or you’re a criminal proxy and you’re being used by a foreign state, you don’t have to deal with law enforcement now you’ve got my agency to deal with, and that’s probably not welcome news to those individuals,” he said.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50710
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22651767 (250758ZFEB25) Notable: Video: NSW Minister Jodie Harrison apologises for Iran event in which Fatima Payman praised regime - NSW Minister for Women Jodie Harrison has apologised for taking part in an Iranian event featuring rogue senator Fatima Payman as a star guest, admitting her decision was “ill considered” after the WA senator used the platform to defend the hardline Islamist regime. Ms Harrison delivered a recorded speech to the event in Sydney on Saturday, which was organised by the Benevolent Iranian Women Association to mark International Women’s Day and included supporters of the Iranian government. In a news segment by Iranian state-owned network PressTV, Senator Payman described Iran as an “incredible” place for women and dismissed criticisms of the regime’s treatment of women as “propaganda”. “The incredible place that Iran is, allowing for women to participate in the workforce to ensure that they have a voice, that their voices are heard, that their (voices) involved in a democratic process - realities that we’re not privy to living here and listening to the propaganda that we receive from very single-sided organisations with specific agenda,” Senator Payman told PressTV. But late on Monday night, Ms Harrison sought to distance herself from the event, telling The Australian she did not share the views of the panellists and regretted her involvement. “I have heard the concerns raised and sincerely apologise for my participation in this event, for the message it sent which is incongruent with the view of myself and of the New South Wales government, and the distress I know it has caused for many,” Ms Harrison said. “I do not share the views expressed by the panellists at this event. The decision to provide a video message was ill-considered and I should not have provided a video message for the event.”
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50707
NSW Minister Jodie Harrison apologises for Iran event in which Fatima Payman praised regime
MOHAMMAD ALFARES - 24 February 2025
NSW Minister for Women Jodie Harrison has apologised for taking part in an Iranian event featuring rogue senator Fatima Payman as a star guest, admitting her decision was “ill considered” after the WA senator used the platform to defend the hardline Islamist regime.
Ms Harrison delivered a recorded speech to the event in Sydney on Saturday, which was organised by the Benevolent Iranian Women Association to mark International Women’s Day and included supporters of the Iranian government.
In a news segment by Iranian state-owned network PressTV, Senator Payman described Iran as an “incredible” place for women and dismissed criticisms of the regime’s treatment of women as “propaganda”.
“The incredible place that Iran is, allowing for women to participate in the workforce to ensure that they have a voice, that their voices are heard, that their (voices) involved in a democratic process — realities that we’re not privy to living here and listening to the propaganda that we receive from very single-sided organisations with specific agenda,” Senator Payman told PressTV.
But late on Monday night, Ms Harrison sought to distance herself from the event, telling The Australian she did not share the views of the panellists and regretted her involvement.
The full clip of Ms Harrison’s recorded message was not provided, but it’s understood she spoke of women’s rights in Iran.
“I have heard the concerns raised and sincerely apologise for my participation in this event, for the message it sent which is incongruent with the view of myself and of the New South Wales government, and the distress I know it has caused for many,” Ms Harrison said.
“Those of us who are privileged to hold public office have a responsibility to promote equality and to create a better New South Wales which does not minimise or undermine the experiences of others.
“I do not share the views expressed by the panellists at this event.
“The decision to provide a video message was ill-considered and I should not have provided a video message for the event.”
Iran’s record on women’s rights has been widely condemned, with hundreds of women arrested in recent years for defying strict dress codes and protesting against the regime’s oppressive laws.
Senator Payman, who quit the Labor Party in June last year over her support for Palestine, later defended her remarks, saying she wanted to “correct the record” on Iran.
“The organisation aimed to correct the narrative they felt was single-sided. To which I advised they should create spaces to educate and share their version of events with politicians and representatives. As a leader, it’s important for me to keep an open mind and listen to both sides,” she said.
Other speakers at the event included Sydney imam Abdul Qudoos Al-Azhari and Islamic Friendship Association founder Keysar Trad.
https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/iran-an-incredible-place-for-women-fatima-payman-claims/news-story/476a4b25d23222d6dcf32f84358436d7
https://x.com/PressTV/status/1893514873998348680
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50711
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22651774 (250805ZFEB25) Notable: Fatima Payman tells Iran regime backers to lobby politicians over women’s rights ‘propaganda’ - Former Labor senator Fatima Payman has encouraged Australian-Iranians sympathetic to the Islamist regime in Tehran to “lobby” politicians about Western “propaganda” on women’s rights, declaring “there’s two sides to every coin”. On Monday, footage surfaced of Senator Payman speaking at a Sydney event hosted by the Benevolent Iranian Women Association, during which she appeared to dismiss global criticism of the Iranian regime’s treatment of women as “single-sided” fake news. In an interview with The Australian after attending the pro-Iran Women’s Day gathering, Senator Payman said she would keep an “open mind” when asked if she had changed her position on the regime. She said the event was “interesting” and suggested that it was her first time as a senator to hear from supporters of the Iranian regime. “I think it was really interesting, and I think I attended the event to just keep an open mind and listen to both sides because I’d heard of one side … I definitely hadn’t heard of the Benevolent Iranian Women’s Association side,” she said. “I think my key advice to them was, look, if this is your narrative and you want people to hear it, I encourage you to create a space for yourself to lobby and talk to your politicians and representatives.” Asked if she believed Australia was one of the Western nation’s allegedly spreading misinformation on Iran, Senator Payman said: “When I referred to propaganda (in the Press TV clip), I specifically mentioned it came from certain organisations with a single-sided view … and there’s two sides of every coin.”
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50707
>>50710
Fatima Payman tells Iran regime backers to lobby politicians over women’s rights ‘propaganda’
MOHAMMAD ALFARES - 25 February 2025
1/2
Former Labor senator Fatima Payman has encouraged Australian-Iranians sympathetic to the Islamist regime in Tehran to “lobby” politicians about Western “propaganda” on women’s rights, declaring “there’s two sides to every coin”.
On Monday, footage surfaced of Senator Payman speaking at a Sydney event hosted by the Benevolent Iranian Women Association, during which she appeared to dismiss global criticism of the Iranian regime’s treatment of women as “single-sided” fake news.
In an interview with The Australian after attending the pro-Iran Women’s Day gathering, Senator Payman said she would keep an “open mind” when asked if she had changed her position on the regime.
She said the event was “interesting” and suggested that it was her first time as a senator to hear from supporters of the Iranian regime.
“I think it was really interesting, and I think I attended the event to just keep an open mind and listen to both sides because I’d heard of one side … I definitely hadn’t heard of the Benevolent Iranian Women’s Association side,” she said.
“I think my key advice to them was, look, if this is your narrative and you want people to hear it, I encourage you to create a space for yourself to lobby and talk to your politicians and representatives.”
Asked if she believed Australia was one of the Western nation’s allegedly spreading misinformation on Iran, Senator Payman said: “When I referred to propaganda (in the Press TV clip), I specifically mentioned it came from certain organisations with a single-sided view … and there’s two sides of every coin.
“If this is your way of wanting to correct the narrative, if you think there’s propaganda out there, empower yourself and do what you want and use the fact that we’re living in a democracy.”
Despite the bizarre remarks she made over the weekend, Senator Payman conceded she did not know what the situation was like for women in Iran.
“I haven’t been to Iran. I don’t know what the situation is like and, frankly speaking, as an Australian senator, I have a lot more pressing matters to be across and to represent my constituents here,” she said.
“Whether I agree with people or not, I’m very open to having a discussion and hearing their side. I would think that now I’ve heard both sides, which I think is helpful to any leader.”
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50712
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22651785 (250818ZFEB25) Notable: Video: Muslim Vote convener warned by his education department employer over comments made on Sydney nurses - Muslim Vote convener and public servant Sheikh Wesam Charkawi has been ordered to work from home for allegedly breaching the NSW Education Departments' social media policy and code of ethics. In an Instagram post on February 16, Sheikh Wesam, commented on the two Sydney nurses threatening harm to Israeli patients in a video. He criticised Australian politicians, branding their response as "selective moral outrage". The Western Sydney Imam is a support officer at Granville Boys High School and a well-established youth leader in the Muslim community. He is also a prominent figure at the helm of the "teal-style" Muslim Vote movement, aiming to unseat Labor frontbenchers like Jason Clare and Tony Burke in the fast-approaching federal election. In an accompanying video in his Instagram post, Sheikh Wesam said the nurses' comments were "never meant to be literal or intended to be a threat to patient care", and that "in current times, in which genocide is unfolding live on our screens, emotions can sometimes get the better of anybody". He criticised the "hypocrisy" of Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and NSW Health Minister Ryan Park for remaining "silent (or) hesitant when confronted with the most egregious acts of violence committed by Israel. We refuse to accept a political a media landscape when Muslims are only visible when they are being condemned but invisible when they are being killed."
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50707
Muslim Vote convener warned by his education department employer over comments made on Sydney nurses
Nabil Al-Nashar - 24 February 2025
Muslim Vote convener and public servant Sheikh Wesam Charkawi has been ordered to work from home for allegedly breaching the NSW Education Departments' social media policy and code of ethics.
In an Instagram post on February 16, Sheikh Wesam, commented on the two Sydney nurses threatening harm to Israeli patients in a video.
He criticised Australian politicians, branding their response as "selective moral outrage".
The Western Sydney Imam is a support officer at Granville Boys High School and a well-established youth leader in the Muslim community.
He is also a prominent figure at the helm of the "teal-style" Muslim Vote movement, aiming to unseat Labor frontbenchers like Jason Clare and Tony Burke in the fast-approaching federal election.
In an accompanying video in his Instagram post, Sheikh Wesam said the nurses' comments were "never meant to be literal or intended to be a threat to patient care", and that "in current times, in which genocide is unfolding live on our screens, emotions can sometimes get the better of anybody".
He criticised the "hypocrisy" of Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and NSW Health Minister Ryan Park for remaining "silent (or) hesitant when confronted with the most egregious acts of violence committed by Israel".
Neither the Prime Minister nor Mr Park's offices wished to comment on Sheikh Wesam's video.
The Prime Minister had described the video of the nurses as "disgusting, sickening and shameful" and later said the nurses did not deserve sympathy.
Sheikh Wesam said "the speed, intensity and coordination of the response from figures that have been otherwise largely indifferent, weak or outright complicit and enabling in the face of mass atrocities", was evidence of a "calculated double-standard".
Mr Park had called the video of the nurses "one of the most vile, shocking and appalling videos I have ever seen".
Sheikh Wesam said: "In Gaza, Muslim professionals have been deliberately targeted, bombed, executed while treating the wounded … where were the health ministers to comment about this?"
In his post he described the response of politicians and media as, "an orchestrated model framework where outrage is not dictated by the severity of an action, but by the one who commits it".
"We refuse to accept a political a media landscape when Muslims are only visible when they are being condemned but invisible when they are being killed."
The NSW Department of Education directed Sheikh Wesam to take down the post from his Instagram and TikTok accounts.
At the time of publishing this article, the Instagram post remained up.
Public servants warned
Simon Draper secretary of the NSW Premier's Department and Kathrina Lo the NSW Public Service Commissioner addressed a letter to all public sector employees a day after Sheikh Wesam's video was published.
The letter read: "You have a duty to uphold the reputation of your department and the government sector as apolitical, impartial and professional."
The letter said this duty extended to employees in a "private capacity in public forums, on social media, or when engaging in political or social issues".
It also said: "You have a right to express your views and support causes, but always with a mind to how it might impact on your role as a public servant."
In a statement, a spokesperson for the department said staff had been made aware of their responsibilities.
"All NSW Department of Education employees have been reminded of their duty to uphold the reputation of the department as apolitical and impartial."
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-02-24/sydney-sheikh-wesam-charkawi-to-work-from-home-nurses-comments/104974798
https://www.instagram.com/wesamcharkawi/reel/DGIV78rSbbb/
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50713
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22651808 (250838ZFEB25) Notable: Australian defence force officer stripped of security clearance over loyalty to Israel - An officer in the Australian army has been stripped of his security clearance because ASIO believes he is more loyal to Israel than Australia, and at risk of being exploited by the Mossad. The man told ASIO interviewers he did not view Israel as a foreign government and that he would share classified information with the Israel Defense Forces if they asked for it. ASIO said the officer, who is Jewish and served 19 years in the Australian military, withheld information from Australian officials about training courses he had undertaken in Israel - where he is not a citizen – which included self-defence, security and firearms training. In a decision published by the administrative review tribunal last week, ASIO said the officer, anonymised as HWMW in tribunal documents, was not of “appropriate character and trustworthiness to hold any security clearance”. “By virtue of HWMW’s demonstrated poor judgement, poor security practices, failure to comply with the obligations of a security clearance holder, his vulnerability to influence or coercion by the Israeli Intelligence Services, and HWMW’s demonstrated loyalty to Israel above the Australian government, ASIO assesses if HWMW were to continue to hold any level of security clearance, he would pose an unacceptable and avoidable risk to security.”
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50707
>>50709
Australian defence force officer stripped of security clearance over loyalty to Israel
ASIO believed the man, anonymised as HWMW, was at risk of being exploited by the Mossad
Ben Doherty - 24 Feb 2025
1/3
An officer in the Australian army has been stripped of his security clearance because ASIO believes he is more loyal to Israel than Australia, and at risk of being exploited by the Mossad.
The man told ASIO interviewers he did not view Israel as a foreign government and that he would share classified information with the Israel Defense Forces if they asked for it.
ASIO said the officer, who is Jewish and served 19 years in the Australian military, withheld information from Australian officials about training courses he had undertaken in Israel – where he is not a citizen – which included self-defence, security and firearms training.
In a decision published by the administrative review tribunal last week, ASIO said the officer, anonymised as HWMW in tribunal documents, was not of “appropriate character and trustworthiness to hold any security clearance”.
“By virtue of HWMW’s demonstrated poor judgement, poor security practices, failure to comply with the obligations of a security clearance holder, his vulnerability to influence or coercion by the Israeli Intelligence Services, and HWMW’s demonstrated loyalty to Israel above the Australian government, ASIO assesses if HWMW were to continue to hold any level of security clearance, he would pose an unacceptable and avoidable risk to security.”
ASIO said it considered lowering the man’s security clearance level, to restrict his access to sensitive information, but said “due to HWMW’s demonstrated loyalty to Israel and poor judgement by withholding security-relevant information during the security clearance process, no such conditions could adequately mitigate the risk of Mossad exploitation to enable acts of espionage or foreign influence”.
HWMW joined the Australian defence force in 2004. In 2008, he obtained a negative vetting 1 security clearance – allowing access up to classified resources up to Secret. This was upgraded to negative vetting 2 – Top Secret access – in 2010.
He joined a Sydney community security group (CSG) as a volunteer between 2014 and 2023. The CSG is a community organisation that provides security and intelligence services to the Jewish community.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50714
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22651821 (250847ZFEB25) Notable: Video: Northern Territory leader Lia Finocchiaro stands by decision to not acknowledge traditional owners at Darwin Bombing ceremony - Northern Territory Chief Minister Lia Finocchiaro has defended her decision not to acknowledge traditional owners at last week’s Bombing of Darwin ceremony, saying the practice had become so widespread under Labor it had lost its meaning. Mrs Finocchiaro was one of eight dignitaries to deliver a speech at the event. Others included Deputy Prime Minister Richard Marles, Nationals MP Barnaby Joyce, Northern Territory Administrator Hugh Heggie, Commander of Darwin’s 1st Brigade Brigadier Doug Pashley, City of Darwin chief executive officer Simone Saunders and Darwin Lord Mayor Kon Vatskalis. Each speaker acknowledged the Larrakia traditional owners while Professor Heggie delivered his welcome in the Larrakia language. There was also a five-minute Welcome to Country delivered by Larrakia man James Parfitt, but Mrs Finocchiaro made no mention of the Larrakia people. She instead made special mention of veterans and their families. “I’d like to make a special acknowledgement to the veterans here today, to serving men and women, to the families and descendants of survivors, ladies and gentlemen, but also importantly to our children,” she said. Traditional owners as well as Labor and Independent politicians criticised the Chief Minister for failing to mention the Larrakia people.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Northern Territory leader Lia Finocchiaro stands by decision to not acknowledge traditional owners at Darwin Bombing ceremony
Matt Cunningham - February 24, 2025
Northern Territory Chief Minister Lia Finocchiaro has defended her decision not to acknowledge traditional owners at last week’s Bombing of Darwin ceremony, saying the practice had become so widespread under Labor it had lost its meaning.
Mrs Finocchiaro was one of eight dignitaries to deliver a speech at the event.
Others included Deputy Prime Minister Richard Marles, Nationals MP Barnaby Joyce, Northern Territory Administrator Hugh Heggie, Commander of Darwin’s 1st Brigade Brigadier Doug Pashley, City of Darwin chief executive officer Simone Saunders and Darwin Lord Mayor Kon Vatskalis.
Each speaker acknowledged the Larrakia traditional owners while Professor Heggie delivered his welcome in the Larrakia language.
There was also a five-minute Welcome to Country delivered by Larrakia man James Parfitt, but Mrs Finocchiaro made no mention of the Larrakia people.
She instead made special mention of veterans and their families.
“I’d like to make a special acknowledgement to the veterans here today, to serving men and women, to the families and descendants of survivors, ladies and gentlemen, but also importantly to our children,” she said.
Traditional owners as well as Labor and Independent politicians criticised the Chief Minister for failing to mention the Larrakia people.
"Very concerning when the Chief Minister doesn't acknowledge the traditional owners in her speeches as she did today in the Bombing of Darwin event,” Labor MP Manuel Brown said on Facebook.
Independent MP Justine Davis replied: “Yes – the only speaker who did not. Even Barnaby Joyce did.”
Larrakia elder Richard Fejo Snr also criticised the Chief Minister.
“Not a single word of acknowledgement. It’s disgraceful,” he said.
But Mrs Finocchiaro defended her speech.
“I’m proud to have acknowledged veterans at the Bombing of Darwin and as Chief Minister I represent all Territorians,” she said.
“There is absolutely no need for every speaker at an event to do an acknowledgment of country and in fact, the repetition that people are so used to under Labor, is less impactful.”
Mrs Finocchiaro’s Country Liberal Party colleague and shadow minister for Indigenous Australians Jacinta Nampijinpa Price has vowed to review Federal Government funding for Welcome to Country ceremonies if the Coalition wins this year’s election.
"I don't believe that we should be spending $450,000 a term on Welcome to Country, when that isn't actually improving the life of a marginalised Indigenous Australian," she said last month.
"That kind of funding could be redirected to actually improve the lives of marginalised Indigenous Australians, as opposed to being used for what is effectively a welcoming ceremony, many of which have now become quite politicised.
“I don’t think it’s necessary to have to spend so much money on something that’s not really helping our most marginalised.”
In response, Minister for Indigenous Australians Malarndirri McCarthy told the ABC the Coalition was focused on culture wars, rather than practical outcomes.
“We know that the Opposition Leader (Peter Dutton) walked out on the apology (to the Stolen Generation), he won’t stand in front of the Indigenous flag and now he doesn’t want elders doing Welcome to Country,” she said.
https://www.skynews.com.au/australia-news/politics/northern-territory-leader-lia-finocchario-stands-by-decision-to-not-acknowledge-traditional-owners-at-darwin-bombing-ceremony/news-story/8b1cdd3c972883a5284ae6e1c0053b73
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VyqJyfJx_ng
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50715
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22651829 (250857ZFEB25) Notable: Video: Senator Lidia Thorpe calls on Indigenous Australians to ‘decolonise’ by planting Aboriginal flags and charging white people rent -Turncoat senator Lidia Thorpe has urged Indigenous Australians to plant the Aboriginal flag on land and make white people pay to visit, to “assert sovereignty’’ over Australia. The former Greens senator, who defected to sit as an Independent, spoke of her ambition to run Blak Sovereign candidates in every state and territory, and outlined her provocative plans to “f*ck the colony” in a closed-door address to an anti-racism symposium organised by the Queensland University of Technology (QUT) in Brisbane. “We have to organise and strategise and take over our land like they did,’’ the Victorian senator said to applause from the audience. “We need to start putting our own flags into our own land and f*ck the colony.’’ Senator Thorpe outlined her plan to seek re-election when her term expires in three years - and then hand her seat to the Blak Sovereign movement by creating a casual vacancy in the Senate. “I have three years left but I’m gonna run again,’’ she said in a recording of her speech to the QUT academic symposium on January 23, obtained by The Australian on Tuesday. “The media don’t know that. I don’t want be there for another six years. The only reason I’m going to run again is to win it back for the Blak Sovereign movement and then I’m gonna hand it to the next generation.’’
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50714
Senator Lidia Thorpe calls on Indigenous Australians to ‘decolonise’ by planting Aboriginal flags and charging white people rent
NATASHA BITA - 25 February 2025
1/2
Turncoat senator Lidia Thorpe has urged Indigenous Australians to plant the Aboriginal flag on land and make white people pay to visit, to “assert sovereignty’’ over Australia.
The former Greens senator, who defected to sit as an Independent, spoke of her ambition to run Blak Sovereign candidates in every state and territory, and outlined her provocative plans to “f*ck the colony” in a closed-door address to an anti-racism symposium organised by the Queensland University of Technology (QUT) in Brisbane.
“We have to organise and strategise and take over our land like they did,’’ the Victorian senator said to applause from the audience. “We need to start putting our own flags into our own land and f*ck the colony.’’
Hailing the academic conference as a “safe space’’, Senator Thorpe ridiculed “white Karen’’ supporters of the voice referendum, claimed that police were launching daily raids on Nazis threatening to kill her, and declared that her ancestors had spoken through her to “tell off’’ King Charles.
“The death threats are every day, every day an AFP (Australian Federal Police) officer is raiding some Nazi that wants to kill me,’’ she said.
Senator Thorpe outlined her plan to seek re-election when her term expires in three years – and then hand her seat to the Blak Sovereign movement by creating a casual vacancy in the Senate.
“I have three years left but I’m gonna run again,’’ she said in a recording of her speech to the QUT academic symposium on January 23, obtained by The Australian on Tuesday.
“The media don’t know that. I don’t want be there for another six years.
“The only reason I’m going to run again is to win it back for the Blak Sovereign movement and then I’m gonna hand it to the next generation.’’
Senator Thorpe said Blak Sovereign candidates could win the “bottom senate seat everywhere … we can have (the) balance of power.’’
Senator Thorpe, who earns a base salary of $233,660, told the symposium how much she hates going to work in Parliament House.
“It is a very violent workplace that I have to go to, every parliament sitting,’’ she said.
“I hate going there, I hate dealing with the people I’ve got to deal with, but I have to do it for my people and for all our ancestors that are watching down on us.’’
Senator Thorpe blamed her ancestors for her heckling of King Charles during his visit to Australia last year, when she shouted “You are not my king’’ and “f*ck the colony’’, after he addressed the Great Hall of Parliament last October.
“It was my ancestors that threw me out into the middle there and told that king off, it was my ancestors that done that,’’ she said.
“I am just the body, I am just the mechanism.’’
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50716
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22651843 (250907ZFEB25) Notable: US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent to address super summit - US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent will address the inaugural Australian Super Summit in Washington this week in a diplomatic win for Australia, as the Albanese government works to leverage Sydney as the next financial services centre for the Indo-Pacific region. The super summit is part of a key diplomatic initiative by the Albanese government - nine months in the making – aimed at unlocking greater returns for Australians by developing stronger investment partnerships and opportunities in the US economy. The push by the Albanese government to unlock opportunities for super funds in the US and potentially expand investment by tens of billions of dollars comes as it ramps up the diplomatic campaign to secure an exemption from Donald Trump’s planned 25 per cent tariffs on steel and aluminium. Jim Chalmers arrived in Washington on Sunday night, local time, and is due to hold his own meeting with Mr Bessent, where the Treasurer will raise the case for tariff exemptions, before delivering his own address to the Super Summit at the Australian embassy in Washington on Tuesday.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>>/qresearch/22551697 (pb)
>>>/qresearch/22558955 (pb)
>>>/qresearch/22638543 (pb)
US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent to address super summit
JOE KELLY - February 24, 2025
1/2
US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent will address the inaugural Australian Super Summit in Washington this week in a diplomatic win for Australia, as the Albanese government works to leverage Sydney as the next financial services centre for the Indo-Pacific region.
The super summit is part of a key diplomatic initiative by the Albanese government – nine months in the making – aimed at unlocking greater returns for Australians by developing stronger investment partnerships and opportunities in the US economy.
The push by the Albanese government to unlock opportunities for super funds in the US and potentially expand investment by tens of billions of dollars comes as it ramps up the diplomatic campaign to secure an exemption from Donald Trump’s planned 25 per cent tariffs on steel and aluminium.
Jim Chalmers arrived in Washington on Sunday night, local time, and is due to hold his own meeting with Mr Bessent, where the Treasurer will raise the case for tariff exemptions, before delivering his own address to the Super Summit at the Australian embassy in Washington on Tuesday.
Australia has the fastest-growing pool of retirement savings in the world, with super funds increasingly looking to expand their investments in the US in a bid to deliver greater returns and diversification for members.
Anthony Albanese discussed the size of Australia’s $4 trillion pool of retirement savings with the US President in his February 10 phone call, during which Mr Trump agreed to consider Australia’s request for an exemption from the planned tariffs that are scheduled to commence from March 12.
Mr Bessent’s attendance at the summit is a positive sign Australia is engaging the Trump administration at the highest levels amid a period of heightened uncertainty as the US upends the global trading system.
Earlier this month, Mr Bessent travelled to Kyiv where he tried to secure an agreement with Ukrainian leader Volodymyr Zelensky for the US to take a key share in the nation’s mineral wealth as part of the broader push for a negotiated settlement to end the hostilities in Eastern Europe.
The Super Summit will include a range of US federal and state officials, leading figures from the US investment community and the chairs and chief executives of Australia’s leading super funds. It will also feature representatives from the venture capital, private equity, infrastructure and innovation ecosystems.
The summit – sponsored by Macquarie Group – will be hosted for two days at the Australian embassy in Washington DC on February 24 and 25 before shifting to the Australian Consulate-General in New York on February 26 and 27.
Australia’s US ambassador Kevin Rudd will open the summit and moderate a discussion with Mr Bessent. Dr Chalmers is scheduled to deliver an address as well as Mr Bessent, Macquarie Group chief executive Shemara Wikramanayake and IFM Investors chair Cath Bowtell.
Dr Chalmers said the Super Summit was about delivering “stronger returns for Australians from stronger ties with the American economy”.
“Australia’s super funds are global leaders in long-term investment, and this summit strengthens their access to the best opportunities in the world’s largest economy,” he said.
“The US market offers scale, diversification and strong returns, helping Australian’s retirement savings keep working to their full potential. This is another demonstration of the mutual benefits in the Australia-US economic relationship.”
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50717
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22651858 (250914ZFEB25) Notable: Trump aide’s fresh attack on tech taxes ahead of Australian trade summit - A top Trump trade adviser has fired a fresh broadside at US allies who levy additional taxes on American tech companies, in a sign Australia’s latest plans to force social media giants to pay for news may antagonise the new administration. The comments came as Treasurer Jim Chalmers arrived in Washington for meetings with his American counterpart amid concerted efforts to convince the Trump administration to exempt Australia from planned tariffs. Peter Navarro, who encouraged tariffs on Australia during US President Donald Trump’s first term, criticised countries for targeting American technology firms with digital services taxes to prop up their own industries. “What these countries are doing is discriminating against our biggest tech companies,” Navarro told CNN. “They do it in a way [that] only applies to the very largest companies, and it’s always the American companies. “Meanwhile, they use them to promote their own national champions inside the country. Effectively, they steal our tax revenues from us. It’s just outrageous.” While Australia does not have such a tax and was not named by Navarro, analysts say the federal government’s plan to compel social media giants to fund Australian news outlets, or face a new tax, would be regarded by the White House as discriminatory. “The media bargaining code is implicitly a tax on disproportionately US-based tech companies in order to fund Australian media,” said Steven Hamilton, a former Australian Treasury official and now assistant professor of economics at George Washington University in Washington.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50716
Trump aide’s fresh attack on tech taxes ahead of Australian trade summit
Michael Koziol - February 25, 2025
1/2
Washington: A top Trump trade adviser has fired a fresh broadside at US allies who levy additional taxes on American tech companies, in a sign Australia’s latest plans to force social media giants to pay for news may antagonise the new administration.
The comments came as Treasurer Jim Chalmers arrived in Washington for meetings with his American counterpart amid concerted efforts to convince the Trump administration to exempt Australia from planned tariffs.
Peter Navarro, who encouraged tariffs on Australia during US President Donald Trump’s first term, criticised countries for targeting American technology firms with digital services taxes to prop up their own industries.
“What these countries are doing is discriminating against our biggest tech companies,” Navarro told CNN. “They do it in a way [that] only applies to the very largest companies, and it’s always the American companies.
“Meanwhile, they use them to promote their own national champions inside the country. Effectively, they steal our tax revenues from us. It’s just outrageous.”
While Australia does not have such a tax and was not named by Navarro, analysts say the federal government’s plan to compel social media giants to fund Australian news outlets, or face a new tax, would be regarded by the White House as discriminatory.
“The media bargaining code is implicitly a tax on disproportionately US-based tech companies in order to fund Australian media,” said Steven Hamilton, a former Australian Treasury official and now assistant professor of economics at George Washington University in Washington.
The latest comments from Navarro came as former Trump chief of staff Mick Mulvaney told a conference in Canberra that Australia should be concerned about Navarro’s increased influence in the administration and a Republican Party that is more protectionist than it was a decade ago.
“You’re right to worry about Peter, he’s a lot more influential now. He went to jail for the president. That counts in that White House,” Mulvaney said, referring to Navarro’s time in prison for violating a subpoena over the January 6, 2021, attack on the US Capitol. “I always thought Peter Navarro was crazy, but that’s just me. But you’re right to worry about it.”
Chalmers was set to meet his US counterpart, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, in Washington overnight, along with the director of Trump’s National Economic Council, Kevin Hassett.
Chalmers declined to comment on the news bargaining incentive. Assistant Treasurer Stephen Jones, through a spokesperson, indicated the matter was being discussed with the Americans.
“The Australian government continues to work constructively with the US government across a range of issues including the news bargaining incentive,” the spokesperson said.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50718
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22651877 (250928ZFEB25) Notable: Inside the Trump-loving gathering that wants to save ‘Austrailia’ - “Look at these crazy Australians, who let them in?” Benny Johnson joked as he took to the stage, gesturing to a rowdy group of fans up the front of the ballroom. “They’re from Australia, they escaped the concentration camps in Australia. The COVID camps. They got out, good for them … We’re going to save Australia.” Johnson, a charismatic, fast-talking media personality with 2.7 million YouTube subscribers and 3.5 million followers on X, is typical of the guests you will find at the Conservative Political Action Conference, the world’s largest gathering of its kind, held annually just outside Washington. What started in the 1970s with a keynote address by Ronald Reagan has morphed into a massive vehicle for Donald Trump’s Make America Great Again movement, and the 2025 edition was a full-blown celebration. From across the country and the world, they flocked to the massive Gaylord National Resort and Convention Centre in National Harbor to declare victory over the “woke” left and “deep state”, to pray at the altar of Trump and to plan the American revolution they have in mind for the next four years - and beyond. A contingent of up to 40 Australians was present, including mining magnate Gina Rinehart and her lieutenant, Teena McQueen, a former Liberal Party vice-president. This correspondent saw no Australian MPs, although 28-year-old Queensland farmer Lachlan Lade, who is running for the Senate, was there in a “Make Australia Great Again” cap. CPAC Australia co-founder Andrew Cooper and chairman Warren Mundine spoke on stage during the Friday morning session, in front of an electronic sign that misspelled the country’s name as “Austrailia”. The tiny but vocal crowd audience cheered as Mundine explained the defeat of the Voice referendum.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Inside the Trump-loving gathering that wants to save ‘Austrailia’
Michael Koziol - February 23, 2025
1/2
National Harbor, Maryland: “Look at these crazy Australians, who let them in?” Benny Johnson joked as he took to the stage, gesturing to a rowdy group of fans up the front of the ballroom.
“They’re from Australia, they escaped the concentration camps in Australia. The COVID camps. They got out, good for them ... We’re going to save Australia.”
Johnson, a charismatic, fast-talking media personality with 2.7 million YouTube subscribers and 3.5 million followers on X, is typical of the guests you will find at the Conservative Political Action Conference, the world’s largest gathering of its kind, held annually just outside Washington.
What started in the 1970s with a keynote address by Ronald Reagan has morphed into a massive vehicle for Donald Trump’s Make America Great Again movement, and the 2025 edition was a full-blown celebration.
From across the country and the world, they flocked to the massive Gaylord National Resort and Convention Centre in National Harbor to declare victory over the “woke” left and “deep state”, to pray at the altar of Trump and to plan the American revolution they have in mind for the next four years – and beyond.
On stage, you were just as likely to see a cabinet secretary or White House official as an alt-right podcaster or foreign dignitary. In the crowd, among the sea of Trump hats and shirts, was a woman dressed as a turquoise Statue of Liberty, a man in a MAGA Indian headdress and a Frenchman who wandered around the convention centre with a tabby cat sitting on his shoulders.
In the exhibition hall, attendees could watch breakout sessions, have their photo taken at a mock “deportation centre”, or fire a bow-and-arrow at targets marked “DEI”, “illegal immigration”, “government spending” and “forever wars”.
A contingent of up to 40 Australians was present, including mining magnate Gina Rinehart and her lieutenant, Teena McQueen, a former Liberal Party vice-president. This correspondent saw no Australian MPs, although 28-year-old Queensland farmer Lachlan Lade, who is running for the Senate, was there in a “Make Australia Great Again” cap.
CPAC Australia co-founder Andrew Cooper and chairman Warren Mundine spoke on stage during the Friday morning session, in front of an electronic sign that misspelled the country’s name as “Austrailia”. The tiny but vocal crowd audience cheered as Mundine explained the defeat of the Voice referendum.
“What we knew was that Australian people had been so beat up, had been so crushed by the wokes and the cancel culture, that they were scared about voting [No],” he said. “Within four to five months, we flipped it. We gave Australians a voice that they could stand up against this cancel culture … and we won.”
The newly confident MAGA movement wants to export itself overseas to the UK, Europe, Korea and Australia. Within these circles, Australia is best known for its strict response to the pandemic as well as new hate speech laws and the Australian government’s tendency to refuse visas to people who may be planning to utter controversial statements on Australian soil.
Many attendees regarded Australia as something verging on an island prison. “I think Australia’s reputation is permanently damaged from their COVID response,” podcaster and online personality Elijah Schaffer said. They are also critical of Australia’s attempts to legislate against hate speech.
“Nobody’s shocked. It’s just, ‘Australia, they don’t have rights there’,” said Schaffer, who has lived in Australia for periods since 2018. “While it’s not fully true, it’s the general perception: the Australian government is seen as a proto fascist police state that does not care about the rights of their own citizens.”
Schaffer made similar remarks at CPAC Australia in 2023 despite reports he was struck from the speaking list after interviewing an Australian neo-Nazi on his show.
Just as he threatens to overshadow the Trump presidency, billionaire Elon Musk stole the show on day one when he received a chainsaw from Argentina’s right-wing populist president Javier Milei and waved it around on stage.
Wearing a black MAGA cap, gold bling and dark sunglasses, Musk spoke haltingly about his political transition to the right, his plans to inspect the country’s gold deposits at Fort Knox, the war in Ukraine (which he called “the biggest graft machine I’ve ever seen in my life”) and his lack of sleep.
“My mind is a storm,” Musk said, before seguing awkwardly to his childhood. “I grew up in South Africa but my morality was informed by America. I read comic books, I played Dungeons and Dragons and I watched American TV shows. It seemed like America cared about being the good guys, about doing the right thing. That’s actually pretty unusual.”
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50719
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22657742 (260816ZFEB25) Notable: Sydney nurse charged over alleged antisemitic threats in online video - A Sydney nurse has been charged over an antisemitic video in which she and a male colleague allegedly threatened to kill Israeli patients and refuse them treatment. Earlier this month, Sarah Abu Lebdeh appeared alongside Ahmad Rashad Nadir in a video filmed on chat site Chatruletka and posted online by Israeli influencer Max Veifer, who described it as his “mission” to expose their antisemitic views. In the video, Abu Lebdeh had said “it’s Palestine’s country, not your country, you piece of shit” and claimed she “won’t treat” Israeli patients and would “kill them”. Ahmad Rashad Nadir, who falsely claimed he was a doctor, said he had “literally sent” Israel patients to “jahannam” (hell). Abu Lebdeh, 26, was arrested at Sutherland Police Station at about 7.30pm on Tuesday. She was charged with three offences, including threatening violence to a group, using a carriage service to threaten to kill, and using a carriage service to menace, harass or offend. NSW Police Commissioner Karen Webb commended Strike Force Pearl detectives for their “exhaustive” investigation. Abu Lebdeh was granted conditional bail and is due to appear in the Downing Centre Local Court on March 19. Speaking in Hobart, Webb said Abu Lebdeh was banned from using social media and from going to a point of departure from Australia.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>>/qresearch/22569145 (pb)
>>>/qresearch/22569170 (pb)
>>>/qresearch/22604514 (pb)
Sydney nurse charged over alleged antisemitic threats in online video
Paul Karp and Lucy Slade - Feb 26, 2025
A Sydney nurse has been charged over an antisemitic video in which she and a male colleague allegedly threatened to kill Israeli patients and refuse them treatment.
Earlier this month, Sarah Abu Lebdeh appeared alongside Ahmad Rashad Nadir in a video filmed on chat site Chatruletka and posted online by Israeli influencer Max Veifer, who described it as his “mission” to expose their antisemitic views.
In the video, Abu Lebdeh had said “it’s Palestine’s country, not your country, you piece of shit” and claimed she “won’t treat” Israeli patients and would “kill them”. Ahmad Rashad Nadir, who falsely claimed he was a doctor, said he had “literally sent” Israel patients to “jahannam” (hell).
Abu Lebdeh, 26, was arrested at Sutherland Police Station at about 7.30pm on Tuesday. She was charged with three offences, including threatening violence to a group, using a carriage service to threaten to kill, and using a carriage service to menace, harass or offend.
NSW Police Commissioner Karen Webb commended Strike Force Pearl detectives for their “exhaustive” investigation.
“Strike Force Pearl detectives must be commended for acting swiftly under enormous pressure and public expectation,” Webb said. “These charges have been laid following a lot of hard work and legal advice, received yesterday from the Commonwealth DPP.
“Detectives have overcome obstacles and jurisdictional challenges to get where we are today. This is the fourteenth arrest under Strike Force Pearl, with a total of 76 charges laid, which demonstrates the commitment of strike force detectives investigating these offences.”
Abu Lebdeh was granted conditional bail and is due to appear in the Downing Centre Local Court on March 19.
Speaking in Hobart, Webb said Abu Lebdeh was banned from using social media and from going to a point of departure from Australia.
Asked why Abu Lebdeh was charged under Commonwealth laws, she said that “the alleged offenders were in NSW” but “the person that they engaged with was overseas and the Commonwealth law best applies to those situations”.
Asked about possible charges for Nadir, Webb said that “the matters are ongoing and there will be further charges down the track”. She confirmed he is yet to be interviewed. Nadir has admitted himself to hospital.
The two nurses have been stood down from their positions at Bankstown-Lidcombe Hospital in Sydney’s south-west. Both NSW Premier Chris Minns and Health Minister Ryan Park have said the nurses will be sacked.
Minns has previously condemned “a summer of rolling hatred” in which Sydney has been rocked by incidents of antisemitic graffiti, firebombings and the discovery of explosives at Dural for a possible mass casualty attack.
On Wednesday, federal Opposition Leader Peter Dutton told reporters in Sydney that the video was “horrific” but he didn’t have any further comment to make about the charges because the matter was before the courts.
“I was at the Central Synagogue only last week, speaking with people from the Jewish community – they’re living in fear at the moment,” he said.
“They’re worried about when the next attack will take place. Holocaust survivors are talking about being fearful and unsafe in this country for the first time since 1945 – it’s a horrible period.”
https://www.afr.com/policy/foreign-affairs/sydney-nurse-charged-over-alleged-antisemitic-threats-in-online-video-20250226-p5lf88
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50720
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22657746 (260822ZFEB25) Notable: Video: NSW nurse charged over video threatening Israeli patients - A Sydney nurse is not allowed to leave the country or use social media after being charged over a video which showed her threatening harm to Israeli patients. Sarah Abu Lebdeh, 26, was arrested on Tuesday night at Sutherland Police Station. She was charged with three commonwealth offences of threaten violence to group, use carriage service to threaten to kill and use carriage service to menace/harass/offend. The video showed Ms Abu Lebdeh and fellow Bankstown Hospital worker Ahmad Rashad Nadir bragging about refusing to treat Israeli patients, killing them, and saying they would go to hell. The filmed conversation took place on cam chat app Chatruletka. The two had been stood down pending an investigation. NSW Police Commissioner Karen Webb on Wednesday afternoon said Ms Abu Lebdeh had been charged with three "very, very serious" charges. "She is on very, very strict bail conditions, namely prohibiting her from going to a point of departure from Australia, but more importantly, banned from using social media," Commissioner Webb said. Mr Nadir, who is currently receiving ongoing medical treatment according to NSW Police, has not been charged, but is still under investigation. Ms Abu Lebdeh was granted conditional bail to appear at the Downing Centre Local Court on Wednesday, March 19.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50719
NSW nurse charged over video threatening Israeli patients
Holly Tregenza - 26 February 2025
A Sydney nurse is not allowed to leave the country or use social media after being charged over a video which showed her threatening harm to Israeli patients.
Sarah Abu Lebdeh, 26, was arrested on Tuesday night at Sutherland Police Station.
She was charged with three commonwealth offences of threaten violence to group, use carriage service to threaten to kill and use carriage service to menace/harass/offend.
The video showed Ms Abu Lebdeh and fellow Bankstown Hospital worker Ahmad Rashad Nadir bragging about refusing to treat Israeli patients, killing them, and saying they would go to hell.
The filmed conversation took place on cam chat app Chatruletka.
The two had been stood down pending an investigation.
NSW Police Commissioner Karen Webb on Wednesday afternoon said Ms Abu Lebdeh had been charged with three "very, very serious" charges.
"She is on very, very strict bail conditions, namely prohibiting her from going to a point of departure from Australia, but more importantly, banned from using social media," Commissioner Webb said.
Mr Nadir, who is currently receiving ongoing medical treatment according to NSW Police, has not been charged, but is still under investigation.
Ms Abu Lebdeh was granted conditional bail to appear at the Downing Centre Local Court on Wednesday, March 19.
Investigation complex, says commissioner
Commissioner Webb said detectives had worked tirelessly to gather evidence from overseas within 13 days.
"I don't think I would have ever imagined that an investigation of that complexity, across the other side of the world, would be done in such a short time," she said.
Commissioner Webb confirmed on ABC Radio Sydney police had found no evidence that anyone at the hospital had been harmed but said NSW Health was continuing its own investigation.
She said the investigation was "not straight forward".
"Given the nature of this offending, where we had two people here in New South Wales and the recording made overseas. It's been a complex investigation given the nature of, we're talking across borders," she said.
"[There] has been a lot of work by investigators and support from overseas jurisdictions to get the statement from the influencer and have it converted to English and have it admissible in court.
"So not straight forward, and that's why we've gone with commonwealth offences, through the advice of the Commonwealth DPP."
This is the 14th arrest under Strike Force Pearl. A total of 76 charges have been laid.
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-02-26/sarah-abu-lebdeh-nurse-charged-threatening-israeli-patients-nsw/104982640
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9mlZPZSJakQ
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50721
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22657750 (260829ZFEB25) Notable: Dreyfus seeks help from Israel as Sydney nurse charged over antisemitic video - Attorney-General Mark Dreyfus has sought help from Israel in the investigation of two Sydney nurses who allegedly threatened to kill Israeli patients and refuse them treatment, taking steps this week to ensure crucial video evidence will be admissible in court. Dreyfus has approached the Israeli government to ensure the evidence will comply with Australian and Israeli law after one of the Bankstown Hospital nurses was charged with threatening violence. The legal step is aimed at overcoming any doubts about the use of a video of the two nurses captured on the live chat platform Chatruletka and shared by Israeli social media influencer Max Veifer. While NSW Police have obtained the video from Veifer, the federal move aims to make sure the video evidence is supplied by the state of Israel and does not encounter any questions in court about its provenance The request was sent to Israeli justice authorities this week and was confirmed on Wednesday by the attorney-general’s office. “The attorney-general has made a request to the State of Israel seeking evidence in support of an investigation by the NSW Police force under ‘Strike Force Pearl’ relating to alleged antisemitic threats,” a spokesman said. “The request is made in accordance with our established international crime cooperation arrangements. We cannot make any further comment.”
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50707
>>50719
Dreyfus seeks help from Israel as Sydney nurse charged over antisemitic video
David Crowe - February 26, 2025
1/2
''Attorney-General Mark Dreyfus has sought help from Israel in the investigation of two Sydney nurses who allegedly threatened to kill Israeli patients and refuse them treatment, taking steps this week to ensure crucial video evidence will be admissible in court.
Dreyfus has approached the Israeli government to ensure the evidence will comply with Australian and Israeli law after one of the Bankstown Hospital nurses was charged with threatening violence.
The legal step is aimed at overcoming any doubts about the use of a video of the two nurses captured on the live chat platform Chatruletka and shared by Israeli social media influencer Max Veifer.
While NSW Police have obtained the video from Veifer, the federal move aims to make sure the video evidence is supplied by the state of Israel and does not encounter any questions in court about its provenance
The request was sent to Israeli justice authorities this week and was confirmed on Wednesday by the attorney-general’s office
“The attorney-general has made a request to the State of Israel seeking evidence in support of an investigation by the NSW Police force under ‘Strike Force Pearl’ relating to alleged antisemitic threats,” a spokesman said.
“The request is made in accordance with our established international crime cooperation arrangements. We cannot make any further comment.”
Sarah Abu Lebdeh, 26, was on Tuesday night charged with one count each of the Commonwealth offences of threatening violence to a group, using a carriage service to threaten to kill, and using a carriage service to menace, harass and offend.
But NSW Police Strike Force Pearl detectives have been unable to speak to the second nurse, Ahmad Rashad Nadir, since he was taken to Liverpool Hospital following a concern for welfare call about 9pm on February 13, the day before police raided his Bankstown home.
Police Commissioner Karen Webb said further charges would be laid over the video once Nadir, who remains in hospital, was interviewed.
“That’s out of my control but when there’s a suitable time, he will be interviewed,” Webb said.
In the now-viral video Abu Lebdeh allegedly threatens Israeli patients and tells Veifer: “One day, your time will come, and you will die the most horrible death.”
When asked what would happen if an Israeli patient came into the hospital, Abu Lebdeh allegedly says: “I won’t treat them; I will kill them.”
Abu Lebdeh, who was arrested and charged after attending Sutherland police station with her lawyer about 7.30pm on Tuesday, was granted conditional police bail to appear at Downing Centre Local Court on March 19.
She is banned from using social media and is required to surrender her passport as part of her bail conditions. She is also prohibited from entering any international airport.
In the video, Nadir allegedly tells Veifer: “You have no idea how many [Israelis] came to this hospital, and I sent them to Jahannam [the Islamic equivalent of the underworld].”
Nadir and Abu Lebdeh have been stood down by NSW Health pending an internal investigation but are expected to be fired from their positions at the hospital.
Both have had their registration suspended by the Nursing and Midwifery Council of NSW, and neither can work as a nurse anywhere in Australia.
They have also been suspended by the Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency, the national watchdog.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50722
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22657759 (260839ZFEB25) Notable: Video: Kids chant ‘Allahu Akbar’ in rally outside Sydney school after nurse charge - Dozens of schoolchildren joined in chants of “Allahu Akbar” (God is the greatest) outside a Sydney public school as tensions rose in the aftermath of police charging nurse Sarah Abu Lebdeh over an anti-Semitic video. Ms Abu Lebdeh and her colleague Ahmad Rashad Nadir, who has not been charged, allegedly threatened to kill Israeli patients and refuse to treat them. On Wednesday morning protesters at Granville Boys High School, in southwest Sydney, demanded the return to school of support officer Sheik Wesam Charkawi, who was ordered by the NSW Education Department to work from home after defending the two nurses in an Instagram post. Palestinian and Lebanese flags were waved during the protest as older men led the chants through loudhailers. Some students in uniform appeared to join the chants, while others gathered behind the school fence also joined in. The protest was organised by Teachers and School Staff for Palestine NSW, which celebrated the “spirited turnout of students, teachers, community for Sheik Wesam”. A spokesperson for the NSW Department of Education said employees had “been reminded of their duty to uphold the reputation of the department as apolitical and impartial.” “Any student who did not follow directions from staff will be subject to appropriate disciplinary action.” NSW Jewish Board of Deputies vice-president David Ossip said: “These are incredibly troubling scenes. It is outrageous, scandalous and sad that children at a taxpayer-funded school were exploited as props at a divisive political rally.”
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50707
>>50712
>>50719
Kids chant ‘Allahu Akbar’ in rally outside Sydney school after nurse charge
STEPHEN RICE - 26 February 2025
1/2
Dozens of schoolchildren joined in chants of “Allahu Akbar” (God is the greatest) outside a Sydney public school as tensions rose in the aftermath of police charging nurse Sarah Abu Lebdeh over an anti-Semitic video.
Ms Abu Lebdeh and her colleague Ahmad Rashad Nadir, who has not been charged, allegedly threatened to kill Israeli patients and refuse to treat them.
On Wednesday morning protesters at Granville Boys High School, in southwest Sydney, demanded the return to school of support officer Sheik Wesam Charkawi, who was ordered by the NSW Education Department to work from home after defending the two nurses in an Instagram post.
Palestinian and Lebanese flags were waved during the protest as older men led the chants through loudhailers. Some students in uniform appeared to join the chants, while others gathered behind the school fence also joined in.
The protest was organised by Teachers and School Staff for Palestine NSW, which celebrated the “spirited turnout of students, teachers, community for Sheik Wesam”.
In his Instagram video, Sheik Charkawi said the nurses’ comments were “never meant to be literal or intended to be a threat to patient care” and criticised the “hypocrisy” of Anthony Albanese and NSW Health Minister Ryan Park for remaining silent “when confronted with the most egregious acts of violence committed by Israel”.
The Muslim Vote convener was ordered to take down the posts and work from home for allegedly breaching the department’s social media policy and code of ethics. Sheik Charkawi has since removed the video.
An Australian National Imams Council member, Sheik Charkawi came to public prominence after establishing The Muslim Vote campaign to take on Labor at the federal election.
On Wednesday the ANIC declared it is “deeply concerned and disappointed by the targeting of Muslim and Pro-Palestinian professionals and staff and most recently one of its own member Imams”.
“Such actions set a dangerous precedent that threatens the principles of fairness, freedom of speech and democracy in Australia.”
A spokesperson for the NSW Department of Education said employees had “been reminded of their duty to uphold the reputation of the department as apolitical and impartial.”
“Any student who did not follow directions from staff will be subject to appropriate disciplinary action.”
NSW Jewish Board of Deputies vice-president David Ossip said: “These are incredibly troubling scenes. It is outrageous, scandalous and sad that children at a taxpayer-funded school were exploited as props at a divisive political rally.
“Serious questions need to be asked about how this was allowed to proceed. How were radicals allowed to stand outside the school gates and whip students into a fervour? How could any student or staff member who doesn’t share the views of the demonstrators feel safe in that environment?”
NSW Education Minister Prue Car has been asked for comment.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50723
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22657762 (260845ZFEB25) Notable: Why antisemitism has become spy chief’s No. 1 worry - The surge in antisemitism has become Australia’s number one security concern for threats to life, the nation’s spy chief has claimed. Australian Security Intelligence Organisation director-general Mike Burgess told a Senate committee that while antisemitism had long festered, he worried anti-Jewish hatred had become normalised in the aftermath of the October 7 Hamas terror attack on Israel, given international protests over its military response. Synagogues have been set on fire and high-profile outbreaks of anti-Israel and anti-Jewish graffiti sprees have blighted neighbourhoods with significant Jewish populations. “We have seen a number of worrying things that were threatening and intimidating and when that goes left unchecked in society that may well create an environment where it gives violence more permission,” Burgess told estimates in response to questions from opposition home affairs spokesman James Paterson. “There is also something that I am on the public record talking about. Again for me, it defies logic, that people can hold Jewish Australians to account for the actions of the Israeli state. It beggars belief that they hold state and territory and federal governments to account for the actions of another sovereign nation.” The explosion in antisemitic incidents has sparked a welter of criticism from the opposition, Jewish Australians and the Israeli government that the Albanese government moved too slowly to stamp it out.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50707
>>50709
Why antisemitism has become spy chief’s No. 1 worry
Andrew Tillett - Feb 25, 2025
The surge in antisemitism has become Australia’s number one security concern for threats to life, the nation’s spy chief has claimed.
Australian Security Intelligence Organisation director-general Mike Burgess told a Senate committee that while antisemitism had long festered, he worried anti-Jewish hatred had become normalised in the aftermath of the October 7 Hamas terror attack on Israel, given international protests over its military response.
Synagogues have been set on fire and high-profile outbreaks of anti-Israel and anti-Jewish graffiti sprees have blighted neighbourhoods with significant Jewish populations.
“We have seen a number of worrying things that were threatening and intimidating and when that goes left unchecked in society that may well create an environment where it gives violence more permission,” Burgess told estimates in response to questions from opposition home affairs spokesman James Paterson.
“There is also something that I am on the public record talking about. Again for me, it defies logic, that people can hold Jewish Australians to account for the actions of the Israeli state. It beggars belief that they hold state and territory and federal governments to account for the actions of another sovereign nation.
“But some people have those views and they have very strong views that might drive a small number of those to think that violence is acceptable, especially if you have got this deep-seated view that you’re antisemitic and the environment and the conditions have given antisemites an excuse to go into the open in ways which we all agree are unacceptable.”
The explosion in antisemitic incidents has sparked a welter of criticism from the opposition, Jewish Australians and the Israeli government that the Albanese government moved too slowly to stamp it out.
Federal Police have established a taskforce to investigate antisemitic crimes while the government buckled to the Coalition’s demands for mandatory minimum sentences in new hate crimes laws passed earlier this month.
Burgess said there were no indications antisemitism had plateaued but hoped a strong police response would see a reduction.
“In terms of threats to life, it’s my agency’s number one priority because of the weight of incidents we’re seeing play out in this country,” Burgess said.
Paterson asked when ASIO would have ever said a form of racism was the number one security concern.
“I don’t believe we have done that in our history. It is the volume of incidents we are dealing with,” Burgess said.
The spy chief said he did not believe the wave of antisemitism was being driven by one foreign actor but was keeping an open mind that foreign interference was involved.
https://www.afr.com/politics/federal/why-antisemitism-has-become-spy-chief-s-no-1-worry-20250225-p5lf40
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50724
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22657775 (260909ZFEB25) Notable: Video: Captain Cook vandals ‘are criminals, not protesters’ - Police are investigating an attempt to decapitate a Captain Cook statue in East Melbourne, saying those responsible will be treated as “criminals, not protesters”. Police said a security patrol alerted officers to three people attempting to sever the head of the statue and using red paint on Captain Cook’s cottage in Fitzroy Gardens about 2am on Tuesday. The statue was reinstalled just over two weeks ago after it was cut off at its feet in a similar protest in February last year, with the repairs costing $13,000. The City of Port Phillip also repaired a Captain Cook statue in St Kilda last year, after it was toppled in the lead up to January 26. Detective Inspector Martin McLean said the force did not view the act as a protest and said offenders will be caught if they don’t hand themselves in. “The community has a pretty dim view on people who behave in this manner,” he said. “I don’t see them as protesters, I see them as criminals and that’s how we’ll deal with them.” He said there had been a strong security presence at the sites given the number of similar acts in recent years, with new security measures being installed at Fitzroy Gardens. “It’s clearly a targeted attack,” he said. CCTV footage shows three hooded figures using what police believe is an angle grinder in an attempt to cut the head off the statue before fleeing. The statue was left with slash marks on its neck. The graffiti, which police described as “anti-Cook comments”, was removed swiftly by the council on Tuesday morning.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>>/qresearch/22427841 (pb)
>>>/qresearch/22427866 (pb)
>>>/qresearch/22427961 (pb)
Captain Cook vandals ‘are criminals, not protesters’
AMELIA SWAN - February 25, 2025
Police are investigating an attempt to decapitate a Captain Cook statue in East Melbourne, saying those responsible will be treated as “criminals, not protesters”.
Police said a security patrol alerted officers to three people attempting to sever the head of the statue and using red paint on Captain Cook’s cottage in Fitzroy Gardens about 2am on Tuesday.
The statue was reinstalled just over two weeks ago after it was cut off at its feet in a similar protest in February last year, with the repairs costing $13,000.
The City of Port Phillip also repaired a Captain Cook statue in St Kilda last year, after it was toppled in the lead up to January 26.
Detective Inspector Martin McLean said the force did not view the act as a protest and said offenders will be caught if they don’t hand themselves in.
“The community has a pretty dim view on people who behave in this manner,” he said. “I don’t see them as protesters, I see them as criminals and that’s how we’ll deal with them.”
He said there had been a strong security presence at the sites given the number of similar acts in recent years, with new security measures being installed at Fitzroy Gardens. “It’s clearly a targeted attack,” he said.
CCTV footage shows three hooded figures using what police believe is an angle grinder in an attempt to cut the head off the statue before fleeing.
The statue was left with slash marks on its neck. The graffiti, which police described as “anti-Cook comments”, was removed swiftly by the council on Tuesday morning.
“I don’t believe they had enough time to be successful,” Inspector McLean said. “They come back at their own peril.”
The council condemned the act, saying taxpayers were the ones who ended up paying for the repairs.
“While there are a range of views on statues and memorials, each time a monument is damaged, it’s ultimately the ratepayer footing the bill,” lord mayor Nicholas Reece said.
The protest follows a similar act in Ballarat in January, where the heads from statues of Paul Keating and Kevin Rudd were severed and stolen.
https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/captain-cook-vandals-are-criminals-not-protesters/news-story/dde9ef43f1669ffaf3cc2e806d696099
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50725
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22657788 (260921ZFEB25) Notable: Video: Jim Chalmers pushes US for tariff exemptions, Donald Trump orders probe into copper tariffs - Treasurer Jim Chalmers has used a meeting with his American counterpart to continue Australia's push for an exemption from hefty tariffs on Australian steel and aluminium imports. His visit coincided with US President Donald Trump flagging possible new tariffs on all imports of copper. Mr Chalmers travelled to the US capital to meet with US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and US National Economic Council Director Kevin Hassett alongside Australia's ambassador to the US, Kevin Rudd. At the top of the agenda was the looming question over whether the Trump administration would continue its planned imposition of 25 per cent tariffs on Australian steel and aluminium. Earlier this month, Mr Trump signed an executive order directing a 25 per cent tariff be placed on all aluminium and steel imports. The tariffs, which are due to be implemented on March 12, have set off alarms and uncertainty across Australia's manufacturing industry and beyond. Prior to his visit to Washington, Mr Chalmers told the ABC he was not expecting to reach a resolution on Mr Trump's planned tariffs as talks were still ongoing. Instead, Mr Chalmers said the visit was about informing the Trump administration of Australia's unique position, and putting forward Australia's case for exemptions.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50716
Jim Chalmers pushes US for tariff exemptions, Donald Trump orders probe into copper tariffs
Phoebe Hosier - 26 February 2024
1/2
Treasurer Jim Chalmers has used a meeting with his American counterpart to continue Australia's push for an exemption from hefty tariffs on Australian steel and aluminium imports.
His visit coincided with US President Donald Trump flagging possible new tariffs on all imports of copper.
Mr Chalmers travelled to the US capital to meet with US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and US National Economic Council Director Kevin Hassett alongside Australia's ambassador to the US, Kevin Rudd.
At the top of the agenda was the looming question over whether the Trump administration would continue its planned imposition of 25 per cent tariffs on Australian steel and aluminium.
Earlier this month, Mr Trump signed an executive order directing a 25 per cent tariff be placed on all aluminium and steel imports.
The tariffs, which are due to be implemented on March 12, have set off alarms and uncertainty across Australia's manufacturing industry and beyond.
Prior to his visit to Washington, Mr Chalmers told the ABC he was not expecting to reach a resolution on Mr Trump's planned tariffs as talks were still ongoing.
Instead, Mr Chalmers said the visit was about informing the Trump administration of Australia's unique position, and putting forward Australia's case for exemptions.
"At the end of the day, this will be President Trump's call," he told reporters in Washington.
"I think that's well understood in the administration, and certainly in our government and in our discussions.
"My task here in DC wasn't to try and conclude that discussion, it was to try and inform it.
"Australia has a different case to make than other countries who have been the focus of the administration here."
Trump flags possible tariffs on copper imports
Later on Tuesday, local time, Mr Trump signed an executive order directing Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick to investigate the imposition of tariffs on all copper imports.
Speaking in the Oval Office, Mr Trump said America's copper industry had been "decimated by global actors attacking our domestic production".
"American industries depend on copper, and it should be made in America. No exemptions, no exceptions," he said.
In 2024, the US imported nearly $35 million worth of copper from Australia.
The biggest exporters of copper to the US are Chile, Canada and Mexico, with much of Australia's exported copper bound for Asia.
Copper is the second most widely used material in US weapons platforms and is in increasing demand due to solar energy and electric vehicle production.
During Mr Trump's first term, Australia was granted an exemption from aluminium tariffs.
But the order signed by Mr Trump earlier this month says "Australia has disregarded its verbal commitment to voluntarily restrain its aluminium exports to a reasonable level".
The position prompted Prime Minister Anthony Albanese to have what he called a "constructive and warm" conversation with Mr Trump, who said he would give "great consideration" to Australia's request for an exemption.
But America's senior trade advisor Peter Navarro made clear he was not in favour of the idea, telling CNN at the time "Australia is just killing our aluminium market".
Last year, Australia exported 223,000 tonnes of steel to the US and 83,000 tonnes of aluminium.
Australia is the world's seventh largest aluminium producer, most of it destined for Asia, while 10 per cent of it heads to the US.
Australia is the US's eighth largest exporter of aluminium into the US, making up some 2.5 per cent of the market.
When it comes to steel imports, Canada, Brazil and Mexico make up the largest sources of US steel imports, according to data from the American Iron and Steel Institute.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50726
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22657800 (260933ZFEB25) Notable: Video: US treasury chief says tariffs are needed to rebuild America - US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has defended tariffs at the Australian embassy in Washington as a crucial tool to reindustrialise America, generate government revenue and bring about a broad economic rebalancing to strengthen US economic security. After giving the keynote speech at the inaugural Australian Super Summit, Mr Bessent washed his hands of any final decision over whether Canberra would be granted an exemption from Donald Trump’s proposed 25 per cent tariffs on steel and aluminium - due to begin from March 12. “We’ll know more about that from USTR (the United States Trade Representative) and Commerce (Secretary),” he said leaving the building. “It’s not really a Treasury issue.” During his remarks, Mr Bessent sketched out the Trump Administration’s expectations for American allies to contribute more towards collective security arrangements and restructure their economies to reduce any imbalances that hollowed out vital US industries. He acknowledged that, on trade, there was “very little friction between the US and Australia” but made clear the Trump Administration was pushing ahead with its reciprocal tariff agenda from early April. He said that on April 2 the Commerce Department and USTR were “going to issue an expansive report” looking at the full spectrum of trade barriers. This would include a thorough examination of tariffs levied against the US as well as the use of non-tariff trade barriers, currency manipulation and fines - including those targeting US digital and tech companies.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50716
>>50725
US treasury chief says tariffs are needed to rebuild America
JOE KELLY - 26 February 2025
1/2
US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has defended tariffs at the Australian embassy in Washington as a crucial tool to reindustrialise America, generate government revenue and bring about a broad economic rebalancing to strengthen US economic security.
After giving the keynote speech at the inaugural Australian Super Summit, Mr Bessent washed his hands of any final decision over whether Canberra would be granted an exemption from Donald Trump’s proposed 25 per cent tariffs on steel and aluminium – due to begin from March 12.
“We’ll know more about that from USTR (the United States Trade Representative) and Commerce (Secretary),” he said leaving the building. “It’s not really a Treasury issue.”
During his remarks, Mr Bessent sketched out the Trump Administration’s expectations for American allies to contribute more towards collective security arrangements and restructure their economies to reduce any imbalances that hollowed out vital US industries.
He acknowledged that, on trade, there was “very little friction between the US and Australia” but made clear the Trump Administration was pushing ahead with its reciprocal tariff agenda from early April.
He said that on April 2 the Commerce Department and USTR were “going to issue an expansive report” looking at the full spectrum of trade barriers.
This would include a thorough examination of tariffs levied against the US as well as the use of non-tariff trade barriers, currency manipulation and fines – including those targeting US digital and tech companies.
Domestic industrial production priority
Mr Bessent said the Covid-19 pandemic and Ukraine conflict had triggered a supply chain crisis exposing the urgent need to “prioritise domestic industrial production at scale” – with tariffs playing a central role in achieving this objective.
The US Commerce Secretary, Howard Lutnick, was expected to address the Super Summit on Tuesday night local time as the Albanese government hopes to leverage the prospect of tens of billions in extra investment from Australian super funds being funnelled into the US economy as part of its diplomatic drive to obtain the tariff exemption.
Jim Chalmers, who met Mr Bessent and US National Economic Council director Kevin Hassett on Tuesday morning local time, said it was “clear to us before the meeting, during the meeting and after the meeting that this call will be made by President Trump on the advice of senior figures in his administration”.
He was “able to continue but not conclude the discussions” over tariff exemptions.
“I was able to make the case for Australia,” the Treasurer said.
“When it comes to the exemption that we seek from tariffs on steel and aluminium, Australia has a different case to make than other countries.”
“The Americans run a very substantial trade surplus with Australia … That trade surplus is 2 to 1. At the same time, Australia’s got a free floating currency. We don’t manipulate our currency,” Dr Chalmers said.
“We’ve got a very productive relationship between the steel and aluminium sectors in both countries. Our products are often an input into domestic production here.”
The Treasurer said Australia was a “very willing and longstanding defence partner” while the economic relationship was “full of mutual benefits, shared interests and big opportunities”.
Asked whether the US was still as reliable an economic and strategic partner as in the past, he replied: “I’ve got no reason to believe otherwise.”
On superannuation, Dr Chalmers said it was a “public policy miracle” that Australia had amassed the “fourth biggest pool of pension funds”, with more than a trillion in funds soon to be invested in the American economy.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50727
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22663947 (270807ZFEB25) Notable: Payman sorry for attending pro-Iran event as more details emerge - Independent Senator Fatima Payman has apologised for attending a pro-Iran “propaganda” event after copping heavy backlash, declaring her comments at the event did not reflect the “realities” of women who suffered violence at the hands of the hardline Islamist regime. In a statement, the former Labor Senator said she acknowledged that the Iranian community was not homogenous, adding that individuals had different lived experiences. Senator Payman had taken part in an interview with Press TV at the gathering, which is a state-backed media organisation that was sanctioned by the Australian government last year after broadcasting the forced confessions of Iranians detained and tried under politically motivated judicial procedures. On Thursday, she conceded to not having any knowledge of Press TV and their political affiliations. “At the event, I listened to Australian-Iranian women share their personal experiences, describing life in Iran in positive terms,” Senator Payman said. “However, I recognise that my comments (with Press TV) did not reflect the realities of women who have suffered violence, brutality, and severe human rights abuses. My intention was never to downplay or minimise their pain. If my words caused hurt, I sincerely apologise. I have consistently condemned injustices and human rights abuses, both in Parliament and at public events, including the deaths of Mahsa Amini and Zomi Frankcom.”
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50707
>>50710
>>50711
Women treated better in Iran than in the West, Sydney pro-Iran ‘propaganda’ event hears
MOHAMMAD ALFARES - 27 February 2025
1/2
Independent Senator Fatima Payman has apologised for attending a pro-Iran “propaganda” event after copping heavy backlash, declaring her comments at the event did not reflect the “realities” of women who suffered violence at the hands of the hardline Islamist regime.
The apology comes after The Australian revealed Senator Payman had encouraged Australian-Iranians sympathetic to the regime in Tehran to “lobby” politicians about Western propaganda on women’s rights.
In a statement on Thursday, the former Labor Senator said she acknowledged that the Iranian community was not homogenous, adding that individuals had different lived experiences.
Senator Payman had taken part in an interview with Press TV at the gathering, which is a state-backed media organisation that was sanctioned by the Australian government last year after broadcasting the forced confessions of Iranians detained and tried under politically motivated judicial procedures.
On Thursday, she conceded to not having any knowledge of Press TV and their political affiliations.
“At the event, I listened to Australian-Iranian women share their personal experiences, describing life in Iran in positive terms,” Senator Payman said.
“However, I recognise that my comments (with Press TV) did not reflect the realities of women who have suffered violence, brutality, and severe human rights abuses.
“My intention was never to downplay or minimise their pain. If my words caused hurt, I sincerely apologise.
“I have consistently condemned injustices and human rights abuses, both in Parliament and at public events, including the deaths of Mahsa Amini and Zomi Frankcom.”
The apology comes after the founder of a peak Islamic body, who spoke at the event in Sydney, declared that Jews were being killed for “American expansionism.”
Founder of the Islamic Friendship Association of Australia Keysar Trad, who in 2017 came under fire for saying said men should only hit women as a “last resort”, described the gathering as constructive and praised Iran’s regime for its treatment of women.
Speaking with The Australian, Mr Trad said the event was meaningful, adding it was important to keep hosting events that offered a “different” perspective to that of Western democracies.
Mr Trad, the former CEO of the Australian Federation of Islamic Councils, claimed women’s rights in Gaza were not being spoken of, telling the crowd women and men were being “raped and tortured” in Israeli prisons.
“I raised a number of issues that take priority in relation to women. For example, the large number of women that were killed in Gaza. Or those who were in Israeli prison who get raped and tortured... We even have stories of Palestinian men getting raped inside the Israeli prisons. The rapists were treated like heroes,” Mr Trad said.
“Israel is, in fact, an American military base, and Jews are getting killed for the sake of American expansionism and imperial designs.
“The sooner the Jewish people realise that, the sooner they’ll be able to pay more of their lives, perhaps, to the Palestinian people, the Palestinian people who welcomed them.”
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50728
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22677028 (010015ZMAR25) Notable: Sheikh Wesam Charkawi returns to Granville Boys High after student protest - School support officer and The Muslim Vote founder Wesam Charkawi, who was ordered to work from home after defending two nurses who allegedly threatened to kill Israeli patients and refuse to treat them, has been “cleared by the department to return” to work. It followed a protest at Granville Boys High School, where students and staff demanded the return of Sheik Charkawi, who was ordered by the NSW Education Department to work from home following his response to the now-viral video of the two nurses. The NSW Department of Education said in a statement that it had “counselled” Sheik Charkawi over his actions and “reminded of his obligations as a department employee”. In an Instagram video posted on February 16, Sheik Charkawi said the nurses’ comments were “never meant to be literal or intended to be a threat to patient care” and criticised the “hypocrisy” of Anthony Albanese and NSW Health Minister Ryan Park for remaining silent “when confronted with the most egregious acts of violence committed by Israel”. The NSW Education Department told The Australian Sheik Charkawi’s Instagram post supporting the nurses had been taken down, but on Thursday it reappeared on the Instagram page Unseat Jason Clare, an account run by Sheik Charkawi and targeting the minister in the traditionally safe Labor seat. The Instagram page Teacher for Palestine NSW, wrote: “Sheikh Wesam Charkawi has been reinstated!!!! Huge protest win!!! We can defeat repression. Palestine will be free from the river to the sea”. Some members of Teachers for Palestine attended the rally at Granville.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50707
>>50712
>>50722
Sheikh Wesam Charkawi returns to Granville Boys High after student protest
JOANNA PANAGOPOULOS - February 28, 2025
School support officer and The Muslim Vote founder Wesam Charkawi, who was ordered to work from home after defending two nurses who allegedly threatened to kill Israeli patients and refuse to treat them, has been “cleared by the department to return” to work.
It followed a protest at Granville Boys High School, where students and staff demanded the return of Sheik Charkawi, who was ordered by the NSW Education Department to work from home following his response to the now-viral video of the two nurses.
The NSW Department of Education said in a statement on Friday morning that it had “counselled” Sheik Charkawi over his actions and “reminded of his obligations as a department employee”.
One of the nurses in the anti-Semitic video Sarah Abu Lebdeh has been charged with three offences including threaten violence to a group and use carriage service to threaten to kill. Her colleague Ahmad Rashad Nadir has not been charged.
In an Instagram video posted on February 16, Sheik Charkawi said the nurses’ comments were “never meant to be literal or intended to be a threat to patient care” and criticised the “hypocrisy” of Anthony Albanese and NSW Health Minister Ryan Park for remaining silent “when confronted with the most egregious acts of violence committed by Israel”.
He also criticised “selective outrage”, saying “We refuse to accept a political and media landscape where Muslims are only visible when are being condemned, but invisible when they are being killed”.
The Muslim Vote convener was ordered to take down the posts and work from home for allegedly breaching the department’s social media policy and code of ethics.
The NSW Education Department told The Australian Sheik Charkawi’s Instagram post supporting the nurses had been taken down, but on Thursday it reappeared on the Instagram page Unseat Jason Clare, an account run by Sheik Charkawi and targeting the minister in the traditionally safe Labor seat.
In a statement on Friday morning, the Department of Education said: “Following meetings with senior officials, Mr Charkawi has been cleared by the department to return to work as a school learning support officer.”
“He has been counselled over his actions and reminded of his obligations as a department employee. Mr Charkawi has removed the social media video and agreed to adhere to the Code of Ethics and Conduct.”
Section 5.13 of the Code of Ethics and Conduct notes that employees are able to participate in public debate on political or social issues, but must not act in a way that casts doubt on their ability or the ability of the department to act impartially, apolitically and professionally.
Charkawi’s lawyer, Majed Kheir, has previously said his client did not breach the department’s social media policy.
“Our feeling was that there’s a level of ambiguity and uncertainty in what is required of public servants and that the department has capitalised upon that level of ambiguity and uncertainty to place pressure on the sheikh to remain silent in this instance,” Mr Kheir told The Guardian.
The Instagram page Teacher for Palestine NSW, wrote: “Sheikh Wesam Charkawi has been reinstated!!!! Huge protest win!!! We can defeat repression. Palestine will be free from the river to the sea”. Some members of Teachers for Palestine attended the rally at Granville.
In the caption, the group wrote: “The very strong response from the community has put pressure on the government to back off and reinstate him. This is how we fight the anti-Palestine witch hunts”.
On Thursday, senior NSW Education Department officials addressed students at Granville Boys High School, warning they would be reviewing video footage from the protest. Anyone found to have flouted directions from school staff would be subject to disciplinary action, the students were told.
The Department issued comments by Acting Principal Maina Ram, where she said on Thursday afternoon, without making mention of the Sheikh’s reinstatement.
“Students are here to learn and the expectation is that they behave in an appropriate manner,” Acting Principal Ram said.
“This school has worked tirelessly over the past decade to be a leading educational facility in the region and the boys here understand that yesterday went too far.”
https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/sheikh-wesam-charkawi-reinstated-to-granville-boys-high-after-student-protest/news-story/b0a785d8b568efb352262796a2c82415
https://www.instagram.com/teachers4palestine_nsw/p/DGkVPz-TQcX/
https://www.instagram.com/unseatjasonclare
https://unseatjasonclare.com/
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50729
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22680066 (011115ZMAR25) Notable: Video: Albanese backs Ukraine after Trump’s catastrophic meeting with Zelensky - Ukraine will turn to Europe for support after an extraordinary, heated argument between US President Donald Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky in the Oval Office that has thrown American military aid into doubt and left a purported peace deal under a cloud. World leaders rallied behind Zelensky in the hours after the confrontation, which ended with the Ukrainian leader being forced to leave the White House early, the cancellation of a lunch and planned joint press conference with Trump, and a deal to share in Ukraine’s rare earth minerals left unsigned. British Prime Minister Keir Starmer professed his “unwavering support for Ukraine” and will host Zelensky and other European leaders at a defence summit in London on Sunday, focused on Ukraine. Following the catastrophic meeting in Washington, the London summit was reportedly expanded to include more European nations and Canada’s Justin Trudeau. Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said Australia would stand with Ukraine “for as long as it takes, because this is the struggle of a democratic nation versus an authoritarian regime led by Vladimir Putin, who clearly has imperialistic designs, not just on Ukraine, but throughout that region”. At the White House meeting, Trump and his vice president, J.D. Vance, repeatedly accused Zelensky of being “disrespectful” of the US and insufficiently grateful for America’s support, while Zelensky called out some of Trump’s false claims and became angered when Vance said it was time to deal diplomatically with Vladimir Putin.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Albanese backs Ukraine after Trump’s catastrophic meeting with Zelensky
Michael Koziol - March 1, 2025
1/2
Washington: Ukraine will turn to Europe for support after an extraordinary, heated argument between US President Donald Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky in the Oval Office that has thrown American military aid into doubt and left a purported peace deal under a cloud.
World leaders rallied behind Zelensky in the hours after the confrontation, which ended with the Ukrainian leader being forced to leave the White House early, the cancellation of a lunch and planned joint press conference with Trump, and a deal to share in Ukraine’s rare earth minerals left unsigned.
British Prime Minister Keir Starmer professed his “unwavering support for Ukraine” and will host Zelensky and other European leaders at a defence summit in London on Sunday, focused on Ukraine. Following the catastrophic meeting in Washington, the London summit was reportedly expanded to include more European nations and Canada’s Justin Trudeau.
Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said Australia would stand with Ukraine “for as long as it takes, because this is the struggle of a democratic nation versus an authoritarian regime led by Vladimir Putin, who clearly has imperialistic designs, not just on Ukraine, but throughout that region”.
At the White House meeting, Trump and his vice president, J.D. Vance, repeatedly accused Zelensky of being “disrespectful” of the US and insufficiently grateful for America’s support, while Zelensky called out some of Trump’s false claims and became angered when Vance said it was time to deal diplomatically with Vladimir Putin.
As the animosity intensified, the men spoke over each other often, and at times raised their voices. Ukraine’s ambassador to the United States, Oksana Markarova, cradled her head in her hands as the meeting went off the rails.
After the confrontation, Trump said he had determined that Zelensky “is not ready for peace if America is involved because he feels our involvement gifted him a big advantage in negotiations”.
“I don’t want advantage, I want peace,” Trump said. “He disrespected the United States of America in its cherished Oval Office. He can come back when he is ready for peace.”
Trump later told reporters, shortly before departing for his Mar-a-Lago resort in South Florida for the weekend, that he wanted an “immediate ceasefire” between Russia and Ukraine, but he expressed doubt that Zelensky was ready to make peace.
Later on Friday, Zelensky sat for an interview with Fox News and said his public spat with Trump and Vance was “not good for both sides”.
But he said Trump – who insists that Putin is ready to end the three-year grinding war – needs to understand Ukraine can’t easily change its attitudes towards Russia, and that Ukraine won’t enter peace talks with Russia until it has security guarantees against another offensive.
“It’s so sensitive for our people,” Zelensky said. “And they just want to hear that America [is] on our side, that America will stay with us. Not with Russia, with us. That’s it.”
In the lengthy and angry confrontation in the Oval Office, Trump and Vance berated Zelensky, calling him disrespectful and telling him to be grateful for America’s help.
“You’re gambling with World War III,” Trump said. “And what you’re doing is very disrespectful to the country – this country – that’s backed you far more than a lot of people said they should. You’re either going to make a deal, or we’re out, and if we’re out, you’ll fight it out. I don’t think it is going to be pretty.”
The clash began when a reporter asked whether Trump was aligned too closely with Putin. Trump said he was not aligned with anybody, but a deal to end the war wouldn’t happen if he didn’t talk to Putin. Vance then added that “thumping our chest” had failed, and it was time to try diplomacy.
Zelensky pointed out that Putin had repeatedly violated previous ceasefire agreements, and queried how the US could engage diplomatically with him.
Vance responded: “I think it’s disrespectful for you to come into the Oval Office and try to litigate this in front of the American media … you should be thanking the president for trying to bring an end to this conflict.”
Zelensky, with his arms folded, challenged Vance on whether he had been to Ukraine to observe the situation first-hand. Vance then accused Zelensky of bringing people on “propaganda tours” of Ukraine.
Shortly afterwards, as Zelensky was trying to make a point, Trump spoke over the top of him, saying: “No, no, you’ve done a lot of talking. Your country is in big trouble. You’re not winning. You have a damn good chance of coming out OK because of us.”
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50730
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22680085 (011123ZMAR25) Notable: ‘Standing up to a bully’: Australia reaffirms Ukraine support - Australia says it will continue to support Ukraine against Russia “who has acted like a bully” but refuses to comment on the tense scenes between the American and Ukraine leaders. During a fiery conference in front of the world’s media the Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelensky and US President Donald Trump exchanged barbs at each other after the two men came together peace in Eastern Europe. Back home in Australia, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese refused to directly answer reporters’ questions about the confrontation between the two leaders. When asked if JD Vance and Mr Trump were bullying Mr Zelensky, Mr Albanese simply said he would stick up for Australia. “What we will do is stand up for Australia’s national interest and Australia has an interest in the international rule of law being upheld, and that is what the people of Ukraine are fighting for,” the Prime Minister said. During the press conference, the Prime Minister was forced to defend our relations with both the US and Ukraine. “What we will do is determine Australia’s position and Australia stand with Ukraine, and there are many of course in the Ukrainian community here as well that I have engaged with for a long period of time now, they are going through, including people who have fled the conflict, the people of Ukraine have suffered greatly in defence of their nation,” he said. “Russia has acted like a bully, a big country seeking to invade and to take over territory from another sovereign nation in this case, Ukraine,” he said. “And like the rest of, overwhelmingly, countries around the world, we have stood with Ukraine and we will continue to do so.”
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50729
‘Standing up to a bully’: Australia reaffirms Ukraine support
CAMERON MICALLEF - 1 March 2025
Australia says it will continue to support Ukraine against Russia “who has acted like a bully” but refuses to comment on the tense scenes between the American and Ukraine leaders.
During a fiery conference in front of the world’s media the Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelensky and US President Donald Trump exchanged barbs at each other after the two men came together peace in Eastern Europe.
Back home in Australia, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese refused to directly answer reporters’ questions about the confrontation between the two leaders.
When asked if JD Vance and Mr Trump were bullying Mr Zelensky, Mr Albanese simply said he would stick up for Australia.
“What we will do is stand up for Australia’s national interest and Australia has an interest in the international rule of law being upheld, and that is what the people of Ukraine are fighting for,” the Prime Minister said.
During the press conference in Marrickville which was supposed to be about the Albanese government freezing the indexation on beer taxes for two years, the Prime Minister was forced to defend our relations with both the US and Ukraine.
“What we will do is determine Australia’s position and Australia stand with Ukraine, and there are many of course in the Ukrainian community here as well that I have engaged with for a long period of time now, they are going through, including people who have fled the conflict, the people of Ukraine have suffered greatly in defence of their nation,” he said.
“Russia has acted like a bully, a big country seeking to invade and to take over territory from another sovereign nation in this case, Ukraine,” he said.
“And like the rest of, overwhelmingly, countries around the world, we have stood with Ukraine and we will continue to do so.”
The call from Australia’s Prime Minister comes as Mr Trump ordered Mr Zelensky and his team to leave the White House on Friday night (US time) telling the Ukraine President he was “not ready” for peace with Russia.
In an incredible verbal scene between the two leaders in front of the world’s media, the US President said Zelensky was being “disrespectful”, warning the Ukrainian leader he is gambling with World War Three.
The two leaders continued to speak over each other with Mr Trump saying Mr Zelensky is in no position to dictate terms.
Mr Trump posted on social media: “He can come back when he is ready for peace.”
The argument between the two leaders is a huge blow to Mr Trump’s election promise to broker a peace settlement to end the war in Eastern Europe.
The White House cancelled a planned joint press conference scheduled for later in the day.
https://www.theaustralian.com.au/breaking-news/standing-up-to-a-bully-australia-reaffirms-ukraine-support/news-story/6295b037d352cafed5fdbeab5bd5bdb5
https://x.com/AlboMP/status/1895648078801334654
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50731
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22680116 (011135ZMAR25) Notable: Video: Anthony Albanese reiterates Australia's stance on Ukraine after wild meeting between Volodymyr Zelensky and Donald Trump - Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has maintained Australia stands firmly with Ukraine, after Volodymyr Zelensky and Donald Trump engaged in a heated public debate. A peace deal to end the longstanding Ukraine-Russia war is now under threat after the fiery media event, which ended without a deal being signed. The two Presidents met in the Oval Office of the White House on Friday after Ukraine agreed to the terms of a minerals deal brokered by the Trump administration. If signed, the deal would give the US up to $500bn in revenue from Ukraine's earth minerals in exchange for continued war effort support, but Zelensky ended up leaving without reaching an agreement. During the meeting, Zelensky, Trump and US Vice President JD Vance engaged in a shouting match. Zelensky ended up leaving the White House shortly after, with a scheduled press conference also cancelled. After several world leaders had already commented on the incident, Mr Albanese was asked about the matter during a press conference on Saturday morning. "We stand with Ukraine," he said. "The people of Ukraine are fighting not just for their own national sovereignty, they are fighting for the international rule of law. "Australia has committed some $1.5 billion to help Ukraine defend itself. More than $1.3 billion of that is military support. We will continue to stand with Ukraine for as long as it takes."
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50729
>>50730
Anthony Albanese reiterates Australia's stance on Ukraine after wild meeting between Volodymyr Zelensky and Donald Trump
Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has thrown his support behind Ukraine after Volodymyr Zelensky left the White House without signing a deal with the United States following an intense meeting with Donald Trump.
Patrick Staveley - March 1, 2025
1/2
Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has maintained Australia stands firmly with Ukraine, after Volodymyr Zelensky and Donald Trump engaged in a heated public debate.
A peace deal to end the longstanding Ukraine-Russia war is now under threat after the fiery media event, which ended without a deal being signed.
The two Presidents met in the Oval Office of the White House on Friday after Ukraine agreed to the terms of a minerals deal brokered by the Trump administration.
If signed, the deal would give the US up to $500bn in revenue from Ukraine's earth minerals in exchange for continued war effort support, but Zelensky ended up leaving without reaching an agreement.
During the meeting, Zelensky, Trump and US Vice President JD Vance engaged in a shouting match. Zelensky ended up leaving the White House shortly after, with a scheduled press conference also cancelled.
After several world leaders had already commented on the incident, Mr Albanese was asked about the matter during a press conference on Saturday morning.
"We stand with Ukraine," he said. "The people of Ukraine are fighting not just for their own national sovereignty, they are fighting for the international rule of law.
"Australia has committed some $1.5 billion to help Ukraine defend itself. More than $1.3 billion of that is military support. We will continue to stand with Ukraine for as long as it takes.
"Because this is the struggle of a democratic nation versus an authoritarian regime led by Vladimir Putin who clearly has imperialistic designs not just on Ukraine but throughout that region."
The Prime Minister dodged commenting on the behaviour and actions of Trump and Vance directly, only continuing to repeat Australia's stance instead.
"There are many of course in the Ukrainian community here as well that I have engaged with for a long period of time now... including people who have fled the conflict, the people of Ukraine have suffered greatly in defence of their nation.
"Russia has acted like a bully, a big country seeking to invade and to take over territory from another sovereign nation in this case, Ukraine.
"What we will do is stand up for Australia's national interest and Australia has an interest in the international rule of law being upheld, and that is what the people of Ukraine are fighting for."
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50732
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22685517 (020749ZMAR25) Notable: Defending Ukraine is in Australia’s national interest: Albanese - Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has linked Ukraine’s war against Russia directly to upholding the rule of international law and Australia’s national interest while leaving the door open to providing more financial and military support to the war-torn nation. Amid the global fallout from the extraordinary heated argument in the White House between Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and US President Donald Trump, Albanese described Zelensky as a hero leading a brave and courageous nation. The Oval Office argument turned into a lecture as Trump and his Vice-President J.D Vance berated Zelensky, who Trump accused of “gambling with World War Three” and of not wanting an end to the conflict that has killed at least 43,000 Ukrainians and an estimated 100,000 Russian soldiers. Albanese, campaigning in western Sydney on Sunday, said the survival of Ukraine from Russia’s aggression was important both to the entire international order and to Australia. “They have shown great bravery, and President Zelensky has shown leadership. He has provided leadership at an extraordinarily difficult time,” he said. “Ukraine is defending its national sovereignty, but it’s also defending the international rule of law, and that is why Australia has a national interest in providing support.”
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50729
>>50730
>>50731
Defending Ukraine is in Australia’s national interest: Albanese
Shane Wright - March 2, 2025
Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has linked Ukraine’s war against Russia directly to upholding the rule of international law and Australia’s national interest while leaving the door open to providing more financial and military support to the war-torn nation.
Amid the global fallout from the extraordinary heated argument in the White House between Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and US President Donald Trump, Albanese described Zelensky as a hero leading a brave and courageous nation.
The Oval Office argument turned into a lecture as Trump and his Vice-President J.D Vance berated Zelensky, who Trump accused of “gambling with World War Three” and of not wanting an end to the conflict that has killed at least 43,000 Ukrainians and an estimated 100,000 Russian soldiers.
Albanese, campaigning in western Sydney on Sunday, said the survival of Ukraine from Russia’s aggression was important both to the entire international order and to Australia.
“They have shown great bravery, and President Zelensky has shown leadership. He has provided leadership at an extraordinarily difficult time,” he said.
“Ukraine is defending its national sovereignty, but it’s also defending the international rule of law, and that is why Australia has a national interest in providing support.”
One of the reasons behind Trump’s argument with Zelensky is the cost of the ongoing war. Trump claims America has delivered $US350 billion in support while most independent analysts put it at closer to $US120 billion.
At the weekend, the British government announced a £2.26 billion ($4.6 billion) bilateral loan agreement with Ukraine, with the money coming from Russian assets frozen by Britain soon after the start of the war.
Albanese said Australia had so far provided $1.5 billion in support, of which $1.3 billion was for military and defence resources.
He signalled more could be provided.
“We examine support on an ongoing basis,” he said.
During the White House meeting, Vance – who has never visited Ukraine – accused Zelensky of using visiting international leaders as part of a “propaganda” campaign to win support for his country. The accusation of propaganda trips has been used extensively by Russian media since the war began.
Albanese, who visited the devastated Ukraine towns of Bucha and Irpin soon after his election in 2022, defended the trip.
“I was welcomed there by President Zelensky. I regarded it as an honour to represent Australia during that visit,” he said.
The Coalition’s home affairs spokesman, James Paterson, said despite the “spectacular theatre” of the White House argument, America would play an important role in securing a ceasefire between Ukraine and Russia.
“It’s very hard to see how peace can be durable if there isn’t American leadership, if there isn’t an American security guarantee,” he told the ABC.
“That does seem to be something that is part of the negotiations between Zelensky and Trump, and we’re all hopeful that that is able to be achieved.”
Shadow defence spokesman Andrew Hastie said the White House incident highlighted the change in America’s approach to diplomatic relations.
“I think what we saw yesterday in the Oval Office is a very different US approach to security and trade. I think President Trump is rebalancing the terms of trade and security, and that has implications for Australia,” he told Sky News.
“We need to demonstrate a strong hand. President Trump studies your cards very closely, and I think he wants to know that his allies have a strong hand.”
https://www.theage.com.au/politics/federal/defending-ukraine-is-in-australia-s-national-interest-albanese-20250302-p5lg8x.html
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50733
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22685531 (020754ZMAR25) Notable: Video: Ukrainian ambassador to Australia says Ukraine needs ongoing US support for its survival - Ukraine's ambassador to Australia says the Oval Office showdown between US President Donald Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy was a "big shock" and warns his country will not survive without ongoing US support. "Emotions were high. We all know it. But Zelenskyy is a very direct man and a very honest man," Vasyl Myroshnychenko told Insiders on Sunday. Despite the extraordinary clash between the two leaders on Friday, Mr Myroshnychenko remains confident a deal between them is still possible. "I'm optimistic that we can find a way to move forward … but we cannot survive without an American commitment. We will continue fighting. We will not surrender, but to end this war we need American involvement." Mr Myroshnychenko said the fiery White House meeting was particularly difficult for his colleague, Ukraine's ambassador to the US, Oksana Markarova, who was pictured with her head in her hands during the meeting. "These are very challenging times and when you represent a country and you spend almost four years working on American support like Oksana has, that was one of those moments which was very difficult for [her] and painful," he said.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50729
>>50730
>>50731
Ukrainian ambassador to Australia says Ukraine needs ongoing US support for its survival
David Speers - 2 March 2025
Ukraine's ambassador to Australia says the Oval Office showdown between US President Donald Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy was a "big shock" and warns his country will not survive without ongoing US support.
"Emotions were high. We all know it. But Zelenskyy is a very direct man and a very honest man," Vasyl Myroshnychenko told Insiders on Sunday.
Despite the extraordinary clash between the two leaders on Friday, Mr Myroshnychenko remains confident a deal between them is still possible.
"I'm optimistic that we can find a way to move forward … but we cannot survive without an American commitment. We will continue fighting. We will not surrender, but to end this war we need American involvement."
Mr Myroshnychenko said the fiery White House meeting was particularly difficult for his colleague, Ukraine's ambassador to the US, Oksana Markarova, who was pictured with her head in her hands during the meeting.
"These are very challenging times and when you represent a country and you spend almost four years working on American support like Oksana has, that was one of those moments which was very difficult for [her] and painful," he said.
Opposition warns China against 'misinterpreting' US/Ukraine split
Shadow Home Affairs Minister James Paterson told Insiders that while diplomacy between allies could occasionally be "robust", American leadership remained critical, while warning China not to "misinterpret" the tensions between the US and Ukraine.
"I think that's in the world's interest, and I think that's in America's interest and I hope we are able to achieve a ceasefire on acceptable terms to Ukraine."
Senator Paterson said a ceasefire that was unacceptable to Ukraine would be a "significant win" to Russian President Vladimir Putin.
"That will not just embolden [Putin], but it will involve others around the world, including our own region."
He also warned China not to misinterpret the tensions between Mr Trump and Mr Zelenskyy.
"It would be a mistake for China to believe the United States views the Indo-Pacific theatre in the same way it views the European theatre," Senator Paterson said.
"There is no retreat for America from the Pacific."
Zelenskyy set to meet European leaders in London
Following his clash with Mr Trump and US Vice-President JD Vance on Saturday, Mr Zelenskyy flew to London for a meeting with British Prime Minister Keir Starmer.
The reception he received at 10 Downing Street was far removed from the shouting match 24 hours earlier in the US capital.
Mr Starmer welcomed Mr Zelenskyy with a warm hug that was captured by the world's media as crowds cheered the Ukrainian leader's arrival.
"I hope you heard some of that cheering in the street. That is the people of the United Kingdom coming out to demonstrate how much they support you … and our absolute determination to stand with you," the British PM told him.
Mr Starmer told Mr Zelenskyy the UK would stand with Ukraine in its war against Russia for "as long as it may take".
The Ukrainian leader will attend a summit of European leaders on Sunday, UK time, followed by a meeting with King Charles.
On Saturday, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese reaffirmed Australia's "unequivocal" support for Ukraine.
"This is the struggle of a democratic nation versus an authoritarian regime led by [Russian President] Vladimir Putin who clearly has imperialistic designs not just on Ukraine but throughout that region," he said.
The government has committed more than $1.5 billion to aid Ukraine in its war with Russia, including the delivery of missiles, armoured personnel carriers and more than 20 Bushmaster vehicles.
Mr Myroshnychenko thanked both the prime minister and Opposition Leader Peter Dutton for their ongoing commitment to Ukraine's war effort.
"They have been very heartening, very heartening to the Ukrainian people who have seen those statements, who have responded very positively to them," he said.
"Elections are coming and I got a commitment from both leaders that, should they win the elections, they will continue supporting Ukraine, and this is what I rely on."
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-03-02/ukrainian-ambassador-australia-says-ongoing-us-support-crucial/105000148
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ynOIriNg98M
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50734
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22685574 (020813ZMAR25) Notable: Tariff carve-out risk rises as Trump trade adviser slams Australia - Donald Trump’s trade adviser Peter Navarro has accused Australia of dumping subsidised, below-cost aluminium into the United States and drawn comparisons to the behaviour of Russia and China, amid rising concern the Albanese government will fail to secure an exemption from tariffs. Just days after Treasurer Jim Chalmers visited Washington to plead the government’s case for a carve-out from 25 per cent tariffs on steel and aluminium, the staunch protectionist whose goal is to bolster American manufacturing said ending country-specific exemptions “sends a clear message”. “The era of unchecked imports undermining American industry is over. The United States will no longer be a dumping ground for heavily subsidised and unfairly traded aluminum,” he wrote in the USA Today article that was later shared by the White House. Navarro went on to claim it was not “just strategic competitors like China and Russia” that had exploited exemptions. “Nations considered US allies also have been a big part of the problem,” he said. “Consider Australia. Its heavily subsidised smelters operate below cost, giving them an unfair dumping advantage, while Australia’s close ties to China further distort global aluminum trade.” In the piece, Navarro said “voluntary restraint agreements” made by the former Coalition government after it won an exemption from tariffs in Trump’s first term initially kept exports in check. But they surged during the Biden term, he said.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50716
>>50717
Tariff carve-out risk rises as Trump trade adviser slams Australia
Ronald Mizen - Mar 2, 2025
Donald Trump’s trade adviser Peter Navarro has accused Australia of dumping subsidised, below-cost aluminium into the United States and drawn comparisons to the behaviour of Russia and China, amid rising concern the Albanese government will fail to secure an exemption from tariffs.
Just days after Treasurer Jim Chalmers visited Washington to plead the government’s case for a carve-out from 25 per cent tariffs on steel and aluminium, the staunch protectionist whose goal is to bolster American manufacturing said ending country-specific exemptions “sends a clear message”.
“The era of unchecked imports undermining American industry is over. The United States will no longer be a dumping ground for heavily subsidised and unfairly traded aluminum,” he wrote in the USA Today article that was later shared by the White House.
Navarro went on to claim it was not “just strategic competitors like China and Russia” that had exploited exemptions.
“Nations considered US allies also have been a big part of the problem,” he said. “Consider Australia. Its heavily subsidised smelters operate below cost, giving them an unfair dumping advantage, while Australia’s close ties to China further distort global aluminum trade.”
In the piece, Navarro said “voluntary restraint agreements” made by the former Coalition government after it won an exemption from tariffs in Trump’s first term initially kept exports in check. But they surged during the Biden term, he said.
As The Australian Financial Review revealed last month, the lift in aluminium exports to the US began in 2022 after Russia was hit with 35 per cent tariffs on the commodity following the illegal invasion of Ukraine. The Biden administration welcomed the alternative source of supply.
“In 2024, Australian capacity utilisation hit 90 per cent even as American capacity utilisation plummeted to nearly 50 per cent,” Navarro wrote.
The opinion piece included a link to news reports of the government’s recent $2 billion support package to help Australia’s four aluminium smelters move to more renewable electricity to bolster green steel.
Alcoa has also received hundreds of millions in bailouts from the Victorian and federal governments over recent decades. In 2017, it received $230 million from both governments to stay open until 2021. Then, in late 2020, it received a further commitment of up to $150 million.
Navarro noted that Alcoa and Rio Tinto, which dominate both Canadian and Australian aluminum markets, have strategically shifted exports to the US for “the two countries to maximise profits”. He then said that Rio Tinto’s biggest shareholder was China. The state-owned Chinalco owns 10.3 per cent of the miner.
Before the Ukraine war, Russia was the third-biggest supplier of aluminium to the US after Canada and Mexico.
The US imported $US673 million ($1.07 billion) of Russian aluminium products in 2022, but sales plummeted to $US50.8 million ($80.8 million) in 2023 and just $US2.32 million ($3.7 million) last year, according to the United Nations’ COMTRADE database on international trade. In contrast, Australian exported $US600 million worth to the US in 2023.
‘No illusions it will be hard’
Treasurer Jim Chalmers on Sunday played down the prospect of Australia getting an exemption following a meeting with US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent in Washington last week.
“We’re under no illusions it will be hard,” Chalmers told Sky News. “I think, as Penny Wong has pointed out before, this is a big hill to climb. It will be harder this time than last time.
“But I was really grateful to Secretary Bessent and also [director of Trump’s National Economic Council Kevin] Hassett for making the time for us to run through the arguments for an Australian exemption.
“I was able to make the case, and our case is compelling when it comes to why Australia is different than some of the other countries.”
Chalmers said he told his counterparts that the US had a trade surplus with Australia, while local superannuation funds have hundreds of billions of dollars of investment flowing into their states.
“We’ve got a lot to offer. This is a relationship of mutual economic benefit.”
https://www.afr.com/politics/federal/tariff-carve-out-risk-rises-as-trump-trade-adviser-slams-australia-20250302-p5lg7w
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50735
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22685587 (020822ZMAR25) Notable: Opinion: Trump tariffs will save American jobs and level the playing field - "In 2018, President Donald Trump implemented Section 232 tariffs on aluminum and steel to protect American producers from a flood of unfairly priced imports threatening our national security. The impact of the Trump tariffs was immediate: Century Aluminum, America’s largest producer, restarted idle production lines; Alcoa expanded operations; U.S. aluminum production surged; and a key industry undergirding our national security was reborn. Enter President Joe Biden: He handed out a complex web of exemptions for other countries and alternative trade arrangements that severely weakened the effectiveness of the Trump tariffs. Predictably, imports once again surged, and by 2024, U.S. aluminum capacity utilization had plummeted to a dangerous 52%, with smelters shutting down and American jobs disappearing. Now, President Trump is taking bold action once again. He has raised the aluminum tariff from 10% to 25% while eliminating all country-specific exemptions. This decisive move sends a clear message: The era of unchecked imports undermining American industry is over. The United States will no longer be a dumping ground for heavily subsidized and unfairly traded aluminum. Predictably, foreign nations are complaining about the new Trump aluminum tariffs. Yet, history needs to be our guide because every one of the countries that benefitted from exemptions or alternatives to the tariff abused the privileges America granted them. Consider Australia. Its heavily subsidized smelters operate below cost, giving them an unfair dumping advantage, while Australia’s close ties to China further distort global aluminum trade. Initially, voluntary restraint agreements in lieu of the Trump tariff kept Australian exports in check. However, once Biden took office, exports surged. In 2024, Australian capacity utilization hit 90% even as American capacity utilization plummeted to nearly 50%. President Trump is now writing a new story for the United States. With one stroke of Trump's pen, the Biden era of idled smelters and declining capacity utilization will come to an end as a golden age of American aluminum production regains its rightful place as a pillar of national security and economic strength. This is far more than a trade battle. It’s a fight for the survival of an essential American industry." - Peter Navarro, White House senior counselor for trade and manufacturing - usatoday.com
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50716
>>50717
>>50734
Opinion: Trump tariffs will save American jobs and level the playing field
President Donald Trump's tariffs on aluminum imports is about far more than a trade battle. It's a fight for the survival of an essential American industry.
Peter Navarro, Opinion contributor - Feb. 28, 2025
1/2
In 2018, President Donald Trump implemented Section 232 tariffs on aluminum and steel to protect American producers from a flood of unfairly priced imports threatening our national security.
The impact of the Trump tariffs was immediate: Century Aluminum, America’s largest producer, restarted idle production lines; Alcoa expanded operations; U.S. aluminum production surged; and a key industry undergirding our national security was reborn.
Enter President Joe Biden: He handed out a complex web of exemptions for other countries and alternative trade arrangements that severely weakened the effectiveness of the Trump tariffs. Predictably, imports once again surged, and by 2024, U.S. aluminum capacity utilization had plummeted to a dangerous 52%, with smelters shutting down and American jobs disappearing.
Now, President Trump is taking bold action once again. He has raised the aluminum tariff from 10% to 25% while eliminating all country-specific exemptions.
This decisive move sends a clear message: The era of unchecked imports undermining American industry is over. The United States will no longer be a dumping ground for heavily subsidized and unfairly traded aluminum.
Predictably, foreign nations are complaining about the new Trump aluminum tariffs. Yet, history needs to be our guide because every one of the countries that benefitted from exemptions or alternatives to the tariff abused the privileges America granted them.
Imports from US allies have flooded American market
It’s not just strategic competitors like China and Russia that have exploited exemptions and loopholes and flooded the U.S. aluminum market. Nations considered U.S. allies also have been a big part of the problem.
Consider Australia. Its heavily subsidized smelters operate below cost, giving them an unfair dumping advantage, while Australia’s close ties to China further distort global aluminum trade.
Initially, voluntary restraint agreements in lieu of the Trump tariff kept Australian exports in check. However, once Biden took office, exports surged. In 2024, Australian capacity utilization hit 90% even as American capacity utilization plummeted to nearly 50%.
As for Canada, with a massive overcapacity of more than 3.3 million metric tons, Canada has historically exported the bulk of its aluminum to the United States.
The consequences of Canada’s cascade of aluminum have been severe: Alcoa was forced to idle its Intalco smelter in Washington state, and other U.S. smelters have struggled to remain profitable – even as the Canadian arm of Alcoa has prospered.
Meanwhile, Alcoa and Rio Tinto, which dominate both Canadian and Australian aluminum markets, have strategically shifted exports to the United States between the two countries to maximize profits. (China is the largest Rio Tinto shareholder.)
While Australia and Canada represent frontal assaults on our aluminum markets, Mexico does not have a primary aluminum industry of its own. Yet it has become a critical entry, transshipment and tariff evasion point for foreign aluminum producers looking to bypass U.S. trade restrictions.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50736
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22685602 (020828ZMAR25) Notable: Jewish, Hindu and Iranian groups call out Labor hypocrisy - A collection of grassroots minority groups have banded together to call out Labor’s lack of action over rising anti-Semitism and racism ahead of the federal election through a new advertising campaign. The Minority Impact Coalition - a collaboration between the Queensland Jewish Collective, Iranian Novin Party and Hindus of Australia – launched the project last week, which will target Labor-held Sydney, Melbourne and southeast Queensland. The campaign urges Australian voters not to be “fooled” by Labor, with the group claiming the government is “playing both sides” of politics by calling out social division while also preferencing the Greens, who are stoking anti-Semitism. While the federal election has not been called, the ad series will be displayed on billboards, trucks and social media in the coming weeks. Community members feature in several advertisements, including Sydney midwife Sharon Stoliar, who has previously spoken about anti-Semitism in the healthcare system. MIC spokeswoman Hava Mendelle said there has been a “massive breakdown” in social cohesion across the country under Labor, which needs to be called out. “We were called the lucky country once,” she said. “It doesn’t feel so lucky any more.” Ms Mendelle, a Jewish first-generation Australian, said she no longer recognises the country she grew up in. “Politicians aren’t doing enough to really ensure that we are cohesive and that we are a community,” she said. “That’s what Australia Day is about. Instead, you’ve got people out there who are saying, ‘death to Australia’. Are you kidding me? People have come here because they want a better life; that’s the Australian dream. “The Greens have been at the forefront of this anti-Australia rhetoric and Labor is just sitting idly by on their hands not doing anything. Call out the Greens, preference them last.”
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50708
Jewish, Hindu and Iranian groups call out Labor hypocrisy
MACKENZIE SCOTT - 2 March 2025
A collection of grassroots minority groups have banded together to call out Labor’s lack of action over rising anti-Semitism and racism ahead of the federal election through a new advertising campaign.
The Minority Impact Coalition – a collaboration between the Queensland Jewish Collective, Iranian Novin Party and Hindus of Australia – launched the project last week, which will target Labor-held Sydney, Melbourne and southeast Queensland.
The campaign urges Australian voters not to be “fooled” by Labor, with the group claiming the government is “playing both sides” of politics by calling out social division while also preferencing the Greens, who are stoking anti-Semitism.
While the federal election has not been called, the ad series will be displayed on billboards, trucks and social media in the coming weeks. Community members feature in several advertisements, including Sydney midwife Sharon Stoliar, who has previously spoken about anti-Semitism in the healthcare system.
MIC spokeswoman Hava Mendelle said there has been a “massive breakdown” in social cohesion across the country under Labor, which needs to be called out.
“We were called the lucky country once,” she said. “It doesn’t feel so lucky any more.”
Ms Mendelle, a Jewish first-generation Australian, said she no longer recognises the country she grew up in.
“Politicians aren’t doing enough to really ensure that we are cohesive and that we are a community,” she said.
“That’s what Australia Day is about. Instead, you’ve got people out there who are saying, ‘death to Australia’. Are you kidding me? People have come here because they want a better life; that’s the Australian dream.
“The Greens have been at the forefront of this anti-Australia rhetoric and Labor is just sitting idly by on their hands not doing anything. Call out the Greens, preference them last.”
The campaign will target five to seven Labor-held electorates in Queensland, Sydney and Melbourne.
One such seat is the Ipswich seat of Blair, west of Brisbane, which long-serving MP Shayne Neumann holds on a margin of 5.2 per cent.
Midwife Ms Stoliar migrated with her family from Sri Lanka when she was a child and has always voted Labor.
But she plans to vote for the Coalition for the first time as she believes it is the “safest bet” for her children, my family, Australian values and peace.
“I’ve always voted Labor because they favoured nursing, working-class people and migrants,” Ms Stoliar said.
“I’ve been very disappointed and let down at their lack of addressing any of the rising anti-Semitism and the racism and lack of protecting people who need to be protected. I’m disgusted by them allowing terrorism to just flourish in this country.
“I can’t donate huge amounts like other people can to the Liberal campaign, so this is my way of doing whatever I can to help change the perception of Labor in immigrant areas and help immigrant communities who might be set on voting Labor to question why a brown woman of colour is on a poster saying that ‘racism flourishes under Labor’.”
The Australian understands Ms Mendelle has been encouraged to apply for Liberal preselection to run for the Greens-held seat of Griffith in Brisbane, which is comfortably held by Max Chandler-Mather.
The Queensland Jewish Collective ran a similar and successful campaign against the Greens at the state election in October.
The party lost one of its two seats, and support for the remaining sitting member, Michael Berkman, slipped 7.4 per cent on first preferences.
https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/jewish-hindu-and-iranian-groups-call-out-labor-hypocrisy/news-story/8860e7e727459496b5b9a9fe235a9579
https://www.dontbefooled.au/
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50737
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22685634 (020835ZMAR25) Notable: Khaki election: Dutton vows to buy more F-35s if Coalition wins office - Australia would get an extra 28 F-35 joint strike fighters under a Coalition government, with Peter Dutton vowing to boost the RAAF’s stealth jet fleet to 100 aircraft if he becomes prime minister after this year’s election. In the first major defence commitment in what looms a khaki-tinged election race, the Opposition Leader pledged to reverse Labor’s decision not to proceed with a fourth squadron of F-35s. The Coalition would provide an initial $3bn in additional Defence Department funding for the jets, with the aim of securing the first of the jets within five years. “I will strengthen our Australian Defence Force with the funding and the capabilities they require to keep Australians safe and secure,” Mr Dutton said. “Australia has long assessed the F-35A as the most capable fighter jet to meet Australia’s defence air power needs. “This investment will bolster our air force and give it the ability to rapidly respond with flexible air combat options across large distances - enhancing access across the Indo-Pacific.” He said Labor’s response to recent live-fire drills by Chinese warships off Australia’s coast had “clearly demonstrated the Prime Minister’s inability to stand up for Australia’s national interests”. The pledge comes as the Trump administration piles pressure on the US’s allies to lift military spending - something both sides of Australian politics will have to grapple with in the coming election campaign.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50708
>>>/qresearch/22647135
>>>/qresearch/22657813
Khaki election: Dutton vows to buy more F-35s if Coalition wins office
BEN PACKHAM - 1 March 2025
Australia would get an extra 28 F-35 joint strike fighters under a Coalition government, with Peter Dutton vowing to boost the RAAF’s stealth jet fleet to 100 aircraft if he becomes prime minister after this year’s election.
In the first major defence commitment in what looms a khaki-tinged election race, the Opposition Leader pledged to reverse Labor’s decision not to proceed with a fourth squadron of F-35s.
The Coalition would provide an initial $3bn in additional Defence Department funding for the jets, with the aim of securing the first of the jets within five years.
“I will strengthen our Australian Defence Force with the funding and the capabilities they require to keep Australians safe and secure,” Mr Dutton said.
“Australia has long assessed the F-35A as the most capable fighter jet to meet Australia’s defence air power needs.
“This investment will bolster our air force and give it the ability to rapidly respond with flexible air combat options across large distances – enhancing access across the Indo-Pacific.”
He said Labor’s response to recent live-fire drills by Chinese warships off Australia’s coast had “clearly demonstrated the Prime Minister’s inability to stand up for Australia’s national interests”.
The pledge comes as the Trump administration piles pressure on the US’s allies to lift military spending – something both sides of Australian politics will have to grapple with in the coming election campaign.
The Coalition has declared it would spend more on defence than Labor, but is yet to provide any further details of the commitment.
Labor says it would increase the defence budget to “over 2.3 per cent” of GDP by 2033-34, after initially pledging to get it to 2.4 per cent.
Opposition defence spokesman Andrew Hastie said with Saturday night’s announcement: “Despite repeatedly warning that Australia is facing the most strategic circumstances since the end of the Second World War, Labor has spent three years dithering and delaying.
“As an island nation in an increasingly contested Indo-Pacific region, it is essential that we are able to defend ourselves and protect our nation’s interests. Increasing our F-35 capability is an effective way we can do so.”
The RAAF has 72 F-35s, which the aircraft’s manufacturer Lockheed Martin bills as “the most lethal, survivable and connected fighter jet in the world”.
But Donald Trump’s close confidant Elon Musk has lashed the aircraft as “obsolete in the age of drones”, and an “expensive and complex Jack of all trades, master of none”.
The Albanese government axed plans to purchase a fourth squadron of F-35s for at least a decade as part of a $72bn cost-cutting exercise last year to find money for the AUKUS submarine program and new warships and missiles.
It said the aircraft weren’t needed because it had decided to keep the RAAF’s workhorse F/A-18F Super Hornets in service longer than originally planned.
The move followed an earlier $7.8bn worth of cuts to planned procurements, for a total of $80bn in defence budget “reprioritisations” during the Labor government’s first term.
Labor argues the Coalition underfunded Defence by $42bn by “over-programming” the department’s budget by up to 40 per cent.
“That means that for every $100 Defence had to spend it was planning to spend $140. Or in other words, more than a quarter of what Defence had planned to buy or deliver, it had no money for,” Defence Minister Richard Marles said last year.
A federal poll must be held by May 17, but speculation is mounting that Anthony Albanese could pull the election trigger within days for an April 5 or April 12 election.
Labor has been on the backfoot over its handling of the Defence portfolio after it emerged the ADF learned of a live-fire drill by Chinese warships in the Tasman Sea 40 minutes after the exercise window opened thanks to a warning relayed by a Virgin Australia pilot.
New Zealand passed on a second warning 50 minutes later from one of its frigates that Australia was relying on to monitor the Chinese vessels.
The revelations, from Defence officials, contradicted Mr Albanese, who had said China provided notice of the drill “in accordance with practice”, and the two warnings came through “at about the same time”.
https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/defence/khaki-election-dutton-vows-to-buy-more-f35s-if-coalition-wins-office/news-story/b5686446b2946ccc892103e3d1002666
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50738
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22691979 (030912ZMAR25) Notable: Harmony Day ‘hides racism’, says government watchdog - Australia’s racism watchdog has warned schools celebrating Harmony Day that the popular event “hides systemic racism’’, and it has produced a classroom lesson plan replete with trigger warnings. The Australian Human Rights Commission wants schools to rename their annual multicultural festivities on March 21 the International Day for the Elimination of Racial Discrimination. Many childcare centres and schools have embraced Harmony Day as a way for children to learn about different cultures by sharing food, dressing in traditional costumes, learning songs and dances, and enjoying visits from family members and Indigenous elders. But the AHRC complains that Australia’s decision to rename IDERD as Harmony Day in 1999 has “turned the day from a protest against racial discrimination into a celebration’’. “The renaming of this day hides the longstanding systemic racial discrimination many people have faced in Australia,’’ the AHRC states in a new “fact sheet for schools’’. “Calling this commemoration Harmony Day/Week causes harm to our collective anti-racism journey by undermining efforts to identify and address the harm experienced by communities because of racism.’’ Despite the AHRC’s scolding, federal Education Minister Jason Clare defended schools’ celebration of Harmony Day. “Harmony Week is all about breaking down barriers and increasing understanding,’’ Mr Clare told The Australian, adding: “That’s a good thing.’’
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Harmony Day ‘hides racism’, says government watchdog
NATASHA BITA - 2 March 2025
1/2
Australia’s racism watchdog has warned schools celebrating Harmony Day that the popular event “hides systemic racism’’, and it has produced a classroom lesson plan replete with trigger warnings.
The Australian Human Rights Commission wants schools to rename their annual multicultural festivities on March 21 the International Day for the Elimination of Racial Discrimination.
Many childcare centres and schools have embraced Harmony Day as a way for children to learn about different cultures by sharing food, dressing in traditional costumes, learning songs and dances, and enjoying visits from family members and Indigenous elders.
But the AHRC complains that Australia’s decision to rename IDERD as Harmony Day in 1999 has “turned the day from a protest against racial discrimination into a celebration’’.
“The renaming of this day hides the longstanding systemic racial discrimination many people have faced in Australia,’’ the AHRC states in a new “fact sheet for schools’’.
“Calling this commemoration Harmony Day/Week causes harm to our collective anti-racism journey by undermining efforts to identify and address the harm experienced by communities because of racism.’’
Despite educators’ concerns about an overcrowded curriculum, the AHRC has produced a lesson plan for teachers to instruct teenagers in years 9 and 10 about interpersonal and systemic racism and discrimination, in line with the national curriculum. The lesson plan contains a trigger warning that “the content may be distressing for students, particularly Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander students and other students negatively impacted by racism’’.
It advises teachers to “consider additional classroom support” and to prepare strategies to support students’ emotional and social wellbeing.
Students would discuss articles from the ABC and SBS, including one about the Sharpeville Massacre in South Africa on March 21, 1960, when white police killed 69 unarmed black protesters and injured hundreds more, on a day the UN commemorated as the International Day for the Elimination of Racial Discrimination.
Despite the AHRC’s scolding, federal Education Minister Jason Clare defended schools’ celebration of Harmony Day.
“Harmony Week is all about breaking down barriers and increasing understanding,’’ Mr Clare told The Australian, adding: “That’s a good thing.’’
Australian Childcare Alliance vice-president Nesha Hutchinson said many young children enjoyed celebrating Harmony Day.
“Lots of kids like it, particularly in multicultural centres,’’ she said. “It’s a day we use to celebrate everybody’s culture.
“Sometimes we get people from different families to come in and talk about their culture.
“Adults can talk about structural and systemic racism, but it’s not for young children.’’
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50739
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22697689 (040755ZMAR25) Notable: Albanese and Dutton have little appetite for sending troops to Ukraine - More than two decades after Australia joined the US-led “coalition of the willing” in Iraq, there is little enthusiasm among the nation’s political leaders for a similarly-billed deployment to Ukraine that even America is steering clear of. British Prime Minister Keir Starmer proposed the peacekeeping coalition to European leaders on Monday AEDT, saying the UK would work with France and a small number of other countries to develop a ceasefire plan that would be backed by “boots on the ground, and planes in the air”. But just weeks out from a federal election, neither side of Australian politics is prepared to commit troops to such a mission. Peter Dutton lavished praise on Volodymyr Zelensky on Monday following his bruising Oval Office encounter last week with Donald Trump, describing the Ukrainian President as a “modern day hero” for standing up to the “murderous dictator” Vladimir Putin. But, like Mr Trump, he said European nations needed to “step up” and deal with the security threat on their eastern frontier. “There’s no need for Australia to send troops, but we should continue our support for Ukraine,” Mr Dutton said. Anthony Albanese said Australia’s longstanding support for Ukraine, including $1.3bn in military equipment, was about “doing what’s right, but also what is in Australia’s national interest”. “The brave people of Ukraine, led so extraordinarily by President Zelensky, are fighting not just for their national sovereignty and for their democracy,” the Prime Minister said as he opened a cabinet meeting. “They are fighting for the international rule of law. And it is an easy choice that Australia has made.” But with memories still fresh of the brutal Iraq and Afghanistan campaigns, Labor is not contemplating another high-risk military deployment. “We will consider the details of any proposal, but the deployment of Australian troops to support peacekeeping forces in Ukraine is not under consideration at this time,” a government spokeswoman said.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50729
>>50730
>>50731
Albanese and Dutton have little appetite for sending troops to Ukraine
BEN PACKHAM and JACQUELIN MAGNAY - 3 March 2025
1/2
More than two decades after Australia joined the US-led “coalition of the willing” in Iraq, there is little enthusiasm among the nation’s political leaders for a similarly-billed deployment to Ukraine that even America is steering clear of.
British Prime Minister Keir Starmer proposed the peacekeeping coalition to European leaders on Monday AEDT, saying the UK would work with France and a small number of other countries to develop a ceasefire plan that would be backed by “boots on the ground, and planes in the air”.
But just weeks out from a federal election, neither side of Australian politics is prepared to commit troops to such a mission.
Peter Dutton lavished praise on Volodymyr Zelensky on Monday following his bruising Oval Office encounter last week with Donald Trump, describing the Ukrainian President as a “modern day hero” for standing up to the “murderous dictator” Vladimir Putin.
But, like Mr Trump, he said European nations needed to “step up” and deal with the security threat on their eastern frontier.
“There’s no need for Australia to send troops, but we should continue our support for Ukraine,” Mr Dutton said.
“The European nations, particularly the bigger nations, can’t continue to rely for financial support or military support from the United States. They need to chip in themselves.”
Anthony Albanese said Australia’s longstanding support for Ukraine, including $1.3bn in military equipment, was about “doing what’s right, but also what is in Australia’s national interest”.
“The brave people of Ukraine, led so extraordinarily by President Zelensky, are fighting not just for their national sovereignty and for their democracy,” the Prime Minister said as he opened a cabinet meeting.
“They are fighting for the international rule of law. And it is an easy choice that Australia has made.”
But with memories still fresh of the brutal Iraq and Afghanistan campaigns, Labor is not contemplating another high-risk military deployment.
“We will consider the details of any proposal, but the deployment of Australian troops to support peacekeeping forces in Ukraine is not under consideration at this time,” a government spokeswoman said.
Former prime minister Tony Abbott offered a lone voice of support for a direct role for Australia in Ukraine under the Starmer plan.
“If we expect British help under the AUKUS deal – such as rotating a Royal Navy sub through Perth – we’ve got to step up too,” Mr Abbott told The Australian. “We’ve long been helping to train Ukrainian infantry and should certainly be prepared to make a significant commitment to policing any ceasefire.”
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50740
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22697695 (040800ZMAR25) Notable: Anthony Albanese now open to having troops as peacekeepers in Ukraine - Anthony Albanese says he is open to sending Australian troops to serve as peacekeepers in Ukraine, in a surprise pre-election statement after the government appeared to reject the idea. The move places Labor at odds with the Coalition just weeks out from a federal poll on the sensitive issue of sending personnel overseas, and comes as Donald Trump piles further pressure on Kyiv by ordering an indefinite pause on US aid to Ukraine. The Prime Minister declared unprompted on Tuesday that he would consider any request for Australia to join a British-led “coalition of the willing” to provide a security guarantee to Ukraine. “There’s a discussion at the moment about potential peacekeeping and from my government’s perspective, we’re open to consideration of any proposals going forward,” he said. “Australia has historically played an important role in areas including in Africa, in Cyprus, in a range of peacekeeping areas. “We want to see peace in Ukraine, but we want to make sure that the illegal, immoral actions of Russia are not rewarded and that Vladimir Putin and his designs, which are imperialistic, not just on Ukraine but on other countries, are not rewarded or encouraged.” His comment, in answer to a question on Australia purchasing fuel refined from Russian oil, came just a day after Defence Industry Minister Pat Conroy appeared to rule out putting Australian boots on the ground in Ukraine. “We’re not envisaging that sort of commitment, but we stand shoulder to shoulder with Ukraine, and we are proud to be the biggest dominant non-NATO contributor,” Mr Conroy said.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50729
>>50731
>>50739
Anthony Albanese now open to having troops as peacekeepers in Ukraine
BEN PACKHAM - 4 March 2025
Anthony Albanese says he is open to sending Australian troops to serve as peacekeepers in Ukraine, in a surprise pre-election statement after the government appeared to reject the idea.
The move places Labor at odds with the Coalition just weeks out from a federal poll on the sensitive issue of sending personnel overseas, and comes as Donald Trump piles further pressure on Kyiv by ordering an indefinite pause on US aid to Ukraine.
The Prime Minister declared unprompted on Tuesday that he would consider any request for Australia to join a British-led “coalition of the willing” to provide a security guarantee to Ukraine.
“There’s a discussion at the moment about potential peacekeeping and from my government’s perspective, we’re open to consideration of any proposals going forward,” he said.
“Australia has historically played an important role in areas including in Africa, in Cyprus, in a range of peacekeeping areas.
“We want to see peace in Ukraine, but we want to make sure that the illegal, immoral actions of Russia are not rewarded and that Vladimir Putin and his designs, which are imperialistic, not just on Ukraine but on other countries, are not rewarded or encouraged.”
His comment, in answer to a question on Australia purchasing fuel refined from Russian oil, came just a day after Defence Industry Minister Pat Conroy appeared to rule out putting Australian boots on the ground in Ukraine.
“We’re not envisaging that sort of commitment, but we stand shoulder to shoulder with Ukraine, and we are proud to be the biggest dominant non-NATO contributor,” Mr Conroy said.
A government spokeswoman also played down the idea. “We will consider the details of any proposal, but the deployment of Australian troops to support peacekeeping forces in Ukraine is not under consideration at this time,” she told The Australian.
On Monday, Peter Dutton rejected the idea of sending Australian troops to Ukraine, saying European nations needed to “step up” and deal with the security threat on their eastern frontier.
“There’s no need for Australia to send troops, but we should continue our support for Ukraine,” Mr Dutton said.
“The European nations, particularly the bigger nations, can’t continue to rely for financial support or military support from the United States. They need to chip in themselves.”
British Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer proposed the European-backed peace plan after crisis talks in London, amid horror on the continent at the US President’s treatment of Ukraine’s President Volodymyr Zelensky at the White House last week, and his expressions of trust in Vladimir Putin.
Meanwhile, West Australian Premier Roger Cook prompted laughter at a business breakfast on Tuesday by labelling US Vice-President JD Vance a “knob”.
Engaging in a question-and-answer session in Perth after his speech, Mr Cook was asked to complete the sentence “JD Vance is a …”.
“Knob,” Mr Cook replied. He added: “You’ve got to have one unprofessional moment don’t you.”
His comment came amid speculation Mr Vance ambushed Mr Zelensky in front of the media in the Oval Office on Friday.
US media reported Mr Trump’s freeze in US aid to Ukraine on Tuesday AEDT. The move came after the President escalated his row with Mr Zelensky, claiming he “doesn’t want there to be peace as long as he has America’s backing”.
Senior Defence Department officials told CNN, Bloomberg and Fox News the pause would last until the President determined that Ukraine’s leaders had demonstrated a “good faith” commitment to peace.
https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/anthony-albanese-now-open-to-having-troops-as-peacekeepers-in-ukraine/news-story/ba6369ef88bc02e5fe0fb09e7ba3bef2
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50741
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22697700 (040805ZMAR25) Notable: WA premier calls JD Vance a ‘knob’ - West Australian Premier Roger Cook on Tuesday called J.D. Vance a “knob” in an off-hand remark to business leaders, days after the US vice president played a central role in a White House meltdown with Ukraine and as Canberra tries to fend of US sanctions. Cook, the Labor leader of the iron ore export-dependent state for nearly two years and who strongly criticised Donald Trump before he was re-elected as president, made the remark at the end of a breakfast function in Perth where he had just completed a speech. At the end of a question and answer session, Cook was asked to provide a short reaction to a series of names and issues. When prompted about Vance, Cook replied: “Knob.” The response drew laughs and applause from the crowd, which included a host of local business leaders and Cook’s predecessor as premier, Mark McGowan. “Sorry, you’ve got to have one unprofessional moment on stage and that was it,” Cook said. At a press conference later on Tuesday, Cook apologised for any offence the comment might have caused. “It was a light-hearted unprofessional moment and I didn’t mean any offence by it,” Cook said. “When I made the comments there was a lot of applause around the room, so perhaps some people enjoyed the fun that came with it, other people may have been offended, and I apologise if there was any offence.” Asked separately about Cook’s remark, federal Treasurer Jim Chalmers told reporters he would have chosen “different words”.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>>/qresearch/22657835
>>50729
>>50740
WA premier calls JD Vance a ‘knob’
Tom Rabe - Mar 4, 2025
West Australian Premier Roger Cook on Tuesday called J.D. Vance a “knob” in an off-hand remark to business leaders, days after the US vice president played a central role in a White House meltdown with Ukraine and as Canberra tries to fend of US sanctions.
Cook, the Labor leader of the iron ore export-dependent state for nearly two years and who strongly criticised Donald Trump before he was re-elected as president, made the remark at the end of a breakfast function in Perth where he had just completed a speech.
At the end of a question and answer session, Cook was asked to provide a short reaction to a series of names and issues.
When prompted about Vance, Cook replied: “Knob.” The response drew laughs and applause from the crowd, which included a host of local business leaders and Cook’s predecessor as premier, Mark McGowan.
“Sorry, you’ve got to have one unprofessional moment on stage and that was it,” Cook said.
At a press conference later on Tuesday, Cook apologised for any offence the comment might have caused.
“It was a light-hearted unprofessional moment and I didn’t mean any offence by it,” Cook said.
“When I made the comments there was a lot of applause around the room, so perhaps some people enjoyed the fun that came with it, other people may have been offended, and I apologise if there was any offence.”
Asked separately about Cook’s remark, federal Treasurer Jim Chalmers told reporters he would have chosen “different words”.
Western Australia is a key state in the multibillion-dollar agreement between Australia, the US and Britain to provide Australia with nuclear-powered submarines and a key base for travelling US navy assets.
A US nuclear-powered Virginia-class submarine is berthed in waters off Perth as part of an AUKUS defence deal training program.
Vance was key to last week’s Oval Office meeting between Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky going off the rails on camera, accusing the war leader of showing disrespect to the US for its support against invader Russia. The breakdown between Ukraine and Washington has reverberated through international relations.
Prime Minister Anthony Albanese’s government is a major donor of aid and military equipment to Zelensky’s administration, and is also trying to convince the White House to give Australia an exemption to Trump’s planned blanket 25 per cent tariff on US steel and aluminium imports.
Cook’s assessment of Vance was not the state leader’s first foray into criticism of team Trump.
Before the US election, he warned a Trump victory would be a worrying result for WA, which was uniquely exposed to a trade war with China given the amount of iron ore the state sells.
In an interview with The Australian Financial Review last month, Cook said he did not regret picking a side ahead of the US poll, despite his state’s involvement in the AUKUS deal, in which American and Australian submarines will be maintained in waters south of Perth.
“One of [Trump’s] key modus operandi is to be disruptive. So we just have to be ready to understand what those shocks to the system are going to be, and be in a position to respond,” he said in the interview.
Cook said the US election result was a key example of why WA needed to diversify its economy away from iron ore, to insulate itself from global shocks or trade wars.
“One of the best ways we can do that is not to be so reliant on resources, and not to be so reliant on single resources.”
McGowan echoed Cook’s sentiment after the event, telling reporters: “I thought Roger was entirely accurate … he answered the question honestly. [Vance] is.”
Labor is widely tipped to win a third term at the state election on Saturday.
https://www.afr.com/politics/federal/wa-premier-labels-us-vice-president-a-knob-20250304-p5lgtm
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50742
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22697717 (040819ZMAR25) Notable: Video: Roger Cook apologises for calling US Vice-President JD Vance a 'knob' - WA Premier Roger Cook says he didn't mean to cause offence when he called US Vice President JD Vance a "knob" during a leadership forum in Perth earlier today, insisting it was a "lighthearted" comment. Cook, who is in the final week of the state election campaign that culminates on Saturday, made the remark to a journalist during a rapid-fire "finish the sentence" game in front of an audience of hundreds of people. "JD Vance is a … ?", the journalist asked. "Knob," Cook responded, sparking laughter and applause. The remarks come during the fallout of Donald Trump and Vance's contentious meeting with Ukraine President Vladimir Zelenskyy at the White House on Friday. Leaders in Australia have been tempered in their response to the incident, largely declining to comment on the approach taken by Trump and Vance, but re-affirming support for Ukraine. Questioned by reporters at a press conference later about whether the comment was damaging to the AUKUS relationship, Cook said he didn't believe the White House would have been listening. "I don't think the people in the Oval Office are listening to a sub-jurisdictional CEO in Western Australia," Cook said. "It was a light moment in a formal function and I hope it was taken in the spirit in which it was intended. "It was a light-hearted and unprofessional moment and I didn't mean any offence by it."
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>>/qresearch/22657835
>>50729
>>50741
Roger Cook apologises for calling US Vice-President JD Vance a 'knob'
Andrea Mayes - 4 March 2025
WA Premier Roger Cook says he didn't mean to cause offence when he called US Vice President JD Vance a "knob" during a leadership forum in Perth earlier today, insisting it was a "lighthearted" comment.
Cook, who is in the final week of the state election campaign that culminates on Saturday, made the remark to a journalist during a rapid-fire "finish the sentence" game in front of an audience of hundreds of people.
"JD Vance is a … ?", the journalist asked.
"Knob," Cook responded, sparking laughter and applause.
The remarks come during the fallout of Donald Trump and Vance's contentious meeting with Ukraine President Vladimir Zelenskyy at the White House on Friday.
Leaders in Australia have been tempered in their response to the incident, largely declining to comment on the approach taken by Trump and Vance, but re-affirming support for Ukraine.
'Lighthearted' but 'unprofessional'
Questioned by reporters at a press conference later about whether the comment was damaging to the AUKUS relationship, Cook said he didn't believe the White House would have been listening.
"I don't think the people in the Oval Office are listening to a sub-jurisdictional CEO in Western Australia," Cook said.
"It was a light moment in a formal function and I hope it was taken in the spirit in which it was intended.
"It was a light-hearted and unprofessional moment and I didn't mean any offence by it."
However, he noted that the remark had been applauded by many in the room.
"There was a lot of applause around the room, so perhaps some people enjoyed the fun that came with it," he said.
"Other people might have been offended and I apologise if there was any offence,' the premier said.
He said that apology extended to JD Vance.
"If any offence was caused to the vice-president or anyone who heard those comments, I do apologise," he said.
'No judgement': Chalmers
Asked about Cook's comments, Federal Treasurer Jim Chalmers trod a delicate path.
"It's up to Roger Cook to choose his own words. I mean [he's an] absolutely outstanding premier," he said.
"I would chose different words. But that doesn't … I'm not making any judgements about the words that Roger chose."
But former WA Premier Mark McGowan, who was also in attendance at today's forum, supported Cook's remarks.
"I thought Roger was entirely accurate," he said when asked by reporters.
"He answered a question honestly."
Trump's 'dark road'
It's not the first time Cook has been critical of Trump and his team.
In November last year, on the last day of campaigning in the US election, Cook labelled Trump an economic threat to WA and warned of the "dark road" ahead if he was elected.
"Beware of any politicians promoting hatred, division and fear in the community." Cook said.
He later told reporters Trump wanted to destroy trade between the US and China, which would have significant implications for WA.
"China depends upon Western Australian iron ore … so in the event we have a Trump government that's obviously a very concerning development," he said at the time.
Asked at today's forum whether he still thought Trump represented a "dark road", Cook responded "well I certainly think he represents an uncertain one".
WA Liberal leader Libby Mettam said Cook's comments showed he had his focus wrong.
"They are foolish comments from a premier who has got his priorities all wrong," she said.
"The premier needs to focus on his job of fixing our broken health system, ensuring our lights stay on [and] addressing law and order issues across the community.”
But director of international and security affairs at think tank the Australia Institute, Emma Shortis, said many people probably agreed with the premier.
"Many Australians are feeling pretty perplexed and concerned about what the Trump administration is doing, particularly what JD Vance did in the Oval Office meeting with Ukrainian president Zelenskyy," she said.
"So maybe while it [Cook's comment] was a little bit unfiltered, I suspect that there are a few people in Australia and around the world as well who might share his feelings."
Dr Shortis said this was reinforced by a recent survey undertaken by the institute which found Australians thought Trump was more of a threat to national security than Russian president Vladimir Putin or Chinese president Xi Jinping.
AUKUS implications
WA is set to play a key role in AUKUS, the joint security partnership between Australia, the US and the UK.
The nuclear-powered submarines at the centre of the deal will be maintained in Perth, a project that will create thousands of jobs and see US personnel stationed in Perth.
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-03-04/wa-premier-roger-cook-calls-us-vp-jd-vance-a-knob-/105007706
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50743
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22697730 (040833ZMAR25) Notable: Cyclone Alfred looks to be final barrier to Anthony Albanese calling April 12 election - Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has all but settled on triggering an April 12 election on Sunday or Monday, but now faces several days of uncertainty caused by potential devastation from Cyclone Alfred hitting south-east Queensland. Government sources said deliberations on whether to go sooner - rather than in May - hinged on whether the storm became too disruptive for the prime minister to justify taking the country to the polls within the next week. The potential weather turmoil comes as preparations for the campaign reach fever pitch. On Monday, Liberal Party director Andrew Hirst wrote to Labor secretary Paul Erickson asking for four debates between the prime minister and Opposition Leader Peter Dutton. The last-minute negotiations coincide with considerable scepticism inside Labor that the government will bring down a budget, currently scheduled for March 25. "I can't see us going to a budget", said one senior figure. They said the choice was now between an April 12 date or waiting for the storm and its impacts to become clear, which could set Mr Albanese up to unleash a longer official campaign that takes the country to an election in early May. Another source said the chance of an election starting this weekend stood at "about 50 per cent", with much consideration being given to the fallout from the cyclone. However, they said the government was "fully ready" to begin campaigning at any moment, with key staff already moved to Labor's campaign headquarters in the Sydney CBD.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50708
Cyclone Alfred looks to be final barrier to Anthony Albanese calling April 12 election
Jacob Greber - 3 March 2025
1/2
Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has all but settled on triggering an April 12 election on Sunday or Monday, but now faces several days of uncertainty caused by potential devastation from Cyclone Alfred hitting south-east Queensland.
Government sources said deliberations on whether to go sooner - rather than in May - hinged on whether the storm became too disruptive for the prime minister to justify taking the country to the polls within the next week.
The potential weather turmoil comes as preparations for the campaign reach fever pitch.
On Monday, Liberal Party director Andrew Hirst wrote to Labor secretary Paul Erickson asking for four debates between the prime minister and Opposition Leader Peter Dutton.
They would be hosted by the ABC's David Speers, as well as Channel Nine, Channel Seven and Sky News, Mr Hirst said in a letter sent to the ABC.
The last-minute negotiations coincide with considerable scepticism inside Labor that the government will bring down a budget, currently scheduled for March 25.
"I can't see us going to a budget", said one senior figure.
They said the choice was now between an April 12 date or waiting for the storm and its impacts to become clear, which could set Mr Albanese up to unleash a longer official campaign that takes the country to an election in early May.
Another source said the chance of an election starting this weekend stood at "about 50 per cent", with much consideration being given to the fallout from the cyclone.
However, they said the government was "fully ready" to begin campaigning at any moment, with key staff already moved to Labor's campaign headquarters in the Sydney CBD.
It is understood that the prime minister has not told colleagues of his plans, but the rising threat from the cyclone has thrown a last-minute leg spinner at the government's tactical decision-making.
The Bureau of Meteorology late on Monday night said Tropical Cyclone Alfred was expected to develop into a category two storm off the Queensland coast by Tuesday morning.
Gales of up to 120 kilometres per hour are expected to develop along a broad swathe of the coast between K'gari (Fraser Island) and the Queensland-NSW border, an area that includes some of the nation's most heavily populated cities.
Mr Albanese had been scheduled to fly to Brisbane on Thursday, but that is now likely to coincide with when the storm is predicted to cross the coast, late on Thursday or Friday.
The potential timing of the landfall means the full impact of the cyclone, which may be the first of its kind to strike so far south in almost half a century, would not become apparent for days.
Speculation about election campaign starts has long centred on this coming Sunday, March 9, which would set up a five-week contest.
However, if the prime minister decides he cannot launch his re-election bid as planned, the timing of Easter and ANZAC holidays means the next likely election dates will be Saturday May 3 or a week later on May 10. The last possible date is May 17.
Mr Albanese has until 6pm on Monday to call an election for April 12.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50744
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22697743 (040841ZMAR25) Notable: Anthony Albanese to adopt ‘less is more’ strategy with Jacinta Allan during election campaign - Anthony Albanese is expected to distance himself from Jacinta Allan and her embattled state Labor government as the federal ALP attempts to avert a voter backlash in its traditional heartland state of Victoria. The Australian understands while Labor plans for the Prime Minister to bask in the glow of popular Labor premiers Peter Malinauskas in South Australia and Roger Cook in Western Australia, the party concedes it has no option but to adopt a minimalist strategy when it comes to the Victorian Premier. Federal Labor - which holds 24 of Victoria’s 39 lower house electorates – senses the ALP brand is on the nose in Victoria, forcing it to mount a defensive campaign to save as many seats as possible. Central to this strategy is keeping Albanese-Allan double acts during the campaign to a bare minimum but stopping short of putting the Premier in the freezer and risk fuelling an image of internal division. With multiple polls showing as many as eight Labor seats in Victoria - Aston, Casey, Chisholm and Corangamite among them – in danger of being lost, a less-is-more Allan strategy has strong support among federal Labor MPs. “I haven’t heard someone say we’re avoiding the Premier … but clearly we want people focusing more on the federal campaign and the federal competition more so than the state government,” one Labor MP said. “It’s obvious that our position in Victoria is not what it was at the height of Daniel Andrews’ powers.”
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>>/qresearch/22544347 (pb)
>>>/qresearch/22544363 (pb)
>>50708
Anthony Albanese to adopt ‘less is more’ strategy with Jacinta Allan during election campaign
DAMON JOHNSTON - 3 March 2025
Anthony Albanese is expected to distance himself from Jacinta Allan and her embattled state Labor government as the federal ALP attempts to avert a voter backlash in its traditional heartland state of Victoria.
The Australian understands while Labor plans for the Prime Minister to bask in the glow of popular Labor premiers Peter Malinauskas in South Australia and Roger Cook in Western Australia, the party concedes it has no option but to adopt a minimalist strategy when it comes to the Victorian Premier.
Federal Labor – which holds 24 of Victoria’s 39 lower house electorates – senses the ALP brand is on the nose in Victoria, forcing it to mount a defensive campaign to save as many seats as possible.
Central to this strategy is keeping Albanese-Allan double acts during the campaign to a bare minimum but stopping short of putting the Premier in the freezer and risk fuelling an image of internal division.
With multiple polls showing as many as eight Labor seats in Victoria – Aston, Casey, Chisholm and Corangamite among them – in danger of being lost, a less-is-more Allan strategy has strong support among federal Labor MPs.
“I haven’t heard someone say we’re avoiding the Premier … but clearly we want people focusing more on the federal campaign and the federal competition more so than the state government,” one Labor MP said.
“It’s obvious that our position in Victoria is not what it was at the height of Daniel Andrews’ powers.”
Concern among federal Labor MPs that they could be punished at the forthcoming election by voters angry at the Allan Labor government have intensified in the wake of last month’s by-election thrashing in Werribee.
Labor’s primary vote crashed 16 per cent in the once safe outer western suburban electorate, leaving the Allan government clinging to the seat as voters vented their anger.
“The Liberals didn’t win Werribee, but we’re the ones who lost 16 per cent of our primary vote so if we’re not humble about that, we’re insane,” one Labor MP said.
“People have done it tough, so therefore how can you be surprised that people are looking for more help and more answers, and if people don’t feel like we’ve done enough they’re going to look elsewhere.”
The collapse of the party’s primary vote, albeit in a state by-election, sent shockwaves through federal Labor in Victoria, sparking concerns the party faces a revolt in outer-suburban seats.
One Labor MP said the party was “very worried” about the federal seats that share a similar profile to Werribee, such as Hawke, Bruce and Holt.
Fuelling tensions between federal and state Labor in Victoria has been a standoff over funding for the $35bn first stage of the Suburban Rail Loop, which the Albanese government has only committed about $2bn towards.
The Allan government has unsuccessfully lobbied the Albanese government to throw billions more at the proposal, but instead of doing that Mr Albanese last month announced another $2bn in funding for the Allan government’s less-favoured airport rail link.
Labor’s federal-state tensions erupted last month when Labor’s federal MP for Gellibrand, Tim Watts, went public in his opposition to an Allan government level crossing proposal that has sparked strong opposition among locals in the western suburbs.
In an open letter, Mr Watts called on the Allan government to “pause” the controversial level crossing removal at Champion Road and urged state colleagues to consult the community.
“During this time I’ve listened to our community’s concerns about the project and reflected them in my discussions with the state government,” he stated in an open letter.
“I have reached the view that the Champion Road level crossing removal should not proceed in its current form … given this, I wrote to the Premier and Minister for Transport Infrastructure some time ago asking them to pause the project.”
Mr Watts, whose electorate borders the state electorate of Werribee, said the Allan government needed to conduct “further community consultations” and called on it to release a traffic study of the impact of the project on a local road: “Given the significant costs of this project as currently designed, and the absence of any offsetting benefits for commuters, I support our community’s call to pause the project until these issues can be addressed.”
https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/when-it-comes-to-jacinta-less-is-more-for-pm/news-story/3ab432b538a4cf6a196debe7e0614aed
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50745
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22697753 (040846ZMAR25) Notable: Albanese, Dutton name terms for campaign debate broadcasts - Opposition Leader Peter Dutton has agreed to debate Anthony Albanese on the ABC, overcoming his criticisms of the public broadcaster as the parties propose up to four verbal sparring matches during the election campaign. Labor has sought to get ahead of the traditional dispute over when and where debates are held, offering National Press Club debates between ministers and opposition shadows in foreign affairs, treasury, health, industrial relations, energy and home affairs. Media executives played down the prospect of minister-level debates, with one saying they “couldn’t sell a debate” involving lower-profile brawlers. With an election likely to be called imminently for an April 12 election, both leaders are keen to be seen as up for the fight. Labor Party national secretary Paul Erickson last week wrote to the press club, which helps co-ordinate debates, saying one debate should be held at the press club, a “respected, neutral platform”. Erickson also suggested an ABC debate and at least one other. Liberal federal director Andrew Hirst on Monday sent a letter to Erickson saying the opposition would be comfortable with four debates in line with those networks’ requests: a Sky News/Daily Telegraph people’s forum in Sydney hosted by Sky’s Kieran Gilbert; a debate hosted by Channel Nine, which has the same owner as this masthead, moderated by Karl Stefanovic or Allison Langdon; a Channel 7 debate in Perth hosted by Mark Riley; and an ABC debate, moderated by David Speers at the ABC’s western Sydney studios.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50708
Albanese, Dutton name terms for campaign debate broadcasts
Paul Sakkal and Calum Jaspan - March 3, 2025
Opposition Leader Peter Dutton has agreed to debate Anthony Albanese on the ABC, overcoming his criticisms of the public broadcaster as the parties propose up to four verbal sparring matches during the election campaign.
Labor has sought to get ahead of the traditional dispute over when and where debates are held, offering National Press Club debates between ministers and opposition shadows in foreign affairs, treasury, health, industrial relations, energy and home affairs.
Media executives played down the prospect of minister-level debates, with one saying they “couldn’t sell a debate” involving lower-profile brawlers.
With an election likely to be called imminently for an April 12 election, both leaders are keen to be seen as up for the fight.
Labor Party national secretary Paul Erickson last week wrote to the press club, which helps co-ordinate debates, saying one debate should be held at the press club, a “respected, neutral platform”. Erickson also suggested an ABC debate and at least one other.
Liberal federal director Andrew Hirst on Monday sent a letter to Erickson saying the opposition would be comfortable with four debates in line with those networks’ requests: a Sky News/Daily Telegraph people’s forum in Sydney hosted by Sky’s Kieran Gilbert; a debate hosted by Channel Nine, which has the same owner as this masthead, moderated by Karl Stefanovic or Allison Langdon; a Channel 7 debate in Perth hosted by Mark Riley; and an ABC debate, moderated by David Speers at the ABC’s western Sydney studios.
Prime-time debates rarely turn elections, and TV ratings for such events are not what they once were. But the tightness of current polling, which shows Labor on track to lose its majority, has put a premium on the campaign performance of the two leaders.
Former US president Joe Biden’s stumbles in a disastrous debate against Donald Trump in June demonstrated the potential damage of a bad debate performance.
The Coalition’s decision to agree to an ABC debate is a change from 2022 when Scott Morrison rejected the national broadcaster, prompting the ABC to call for legislation to ensure it held a debate each election.
The ABC’s news boss Justin Stevens said the ABC had proposed a debate between Albanese and Dutton, to be moderated by Insiders host David Speers.
“We are flexible with timing and location,” Stevens said.
None of the networks have been confirmed as debate hosts. Nine and Sky are both keen to host the first debate, according to industry sources not authorised to speak publicly.
Industrial Relations Minister Murray Watt has challenged his counterpart Michaelia Cash, while the prime minister is keen on a showdown between Climate and Energy Minister Chris Bowen and counterpart Ted O’Brien.
“Can I just say, at a time where shares are in the media, can I say this: get some popcorn shares because Chris Bowen versus Ted O’Brien in a debate is something I’ll be sitting down having some popcorn on watching,” Albanese said.
https://www.theage.com.au/politics/federal/albanese-dutton-name-terms-for-campaign-debate-broadcasts-20250303-p5lgjk.html
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50746
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22706018 (050835ZMAR25) Notable: Second nurse charged over anti-Semitic video - Police have charged the second nurse over a viral anti-Semitic video allegedly broadcast from a hospital in Bankstown Hospital. Nurse Rashad Nadir, who was captured on the video, telling Israeli influencer Max Veifer he “had no idea” the number of Israelis who had attended Bankstown Hospital he had sent to “hell”, has been charged with a Commonwealth offence. The 27-year-old was arrested at Sutherland Police Station about 7.30pm on Tuesday and charged with using a carriage service to menace/harass/offend threaten to menace, harass or cause offence. He was also charged with possessing a prohibited drug. The other nurse in the video, Sarah Abu Lebdeh, was charged last week, after saying she would not treat Israeli patients but “kill them”, telling Mr Veifer he would “die the most disgusting death”. “One day, your time will come, and you will die the most horrible death,” she said. Ms Abu Lebdeh, 26, was charged with three offences: threaten violence to group, use carriage service to threaten to kill, and use carriage service to menace/harass/offend. Both nurses were immediately sacked and banned from practising as nurses after the video was circulated online. Ms Abu Lebdeh and Mr Nadir will both appear at Downing Centre Local Court later this month.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>>/qresearch/22569145 (pb)
>>>/qresearch/22569170 (pb)
>>50719
Second nurse charged over anti-Semitic video
JOANNA PANAGOPOULOS - 5 March 2025
Police have charged the second nurse over a viral anti-Semitic video allegedly broadcast from a hospital in Bankstown Hospital.
Nurse Rashad Nadir, who was captured on the video, telling Israeli influencer Max Veifer he “had no idea” the number of Israelis who had attended Bankstown Hospital he had sent to “hell”, has been charged with a Commonwealth offence.
The 27-year-old was arrested at Sutherland Police Station about 7.30pm on Tuesday and charged with using a carriage service to menace/harass/offend threaten to menace, harass or cause offence.
He was also charged with possessing a prohibited drug.
The other nurse in the video, Sarah Abu Lebdeh, was charged last week, after saying she would not treat Israeli patients but “kill them”, telling Mr Veifer he would “die the most disgusting death”.
“One day, your time will come, and you will die the most horrible death,” she said.
Ms Abu Lebdeh, 26, was charged with three offences: threaten violence to group, use carriage service to threaten to kill, and use carriage service to menace/harass/offend.
Both nurses were immediately sacked and banned from practising as nurses after the video was circulated online.
NSW Police Commissioner Karen Webb said Strike Force Pearl detectives have now arrested 15 people and laid a total of 78 charges.
“I must commend the work Strike Force Pearl detectives are doing to investigate, charge and put these individuals before the courts.
“There is a tremendous amount of dedication and hard work going into all these investigations.
“Detectives have overcome many challenges – including huge public expectation – to put these individuals before the court,” Commissioner Webb said.
Ms Abu Lebdeh and Mr Nadir will both appear at Downing Centre Local Court later this month.
https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/second-nurse-charged-over-antisemitic-video/news-story/20dac8f4ec64ede3bf443ab1ddcd9763
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50747
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22706025 (050840ZMAR25) Notable: WA teen arrested after ‘heinous’ threat to carry out ‘Christchurch 2.0’ attack on new Sydney mosque - A teenager from Western Australia has been arrested after a “heinous” threat was allegedly made to a newly opened southwest Sydney mosque, where he allegedly vowed to “christ church 2.0 this joint” just as Australian Muslims prepared for the holy month of Ramadan. The threat, posted by an Instagram account onto The Australian Islamic House’s page on Monday, vowed to carry out an atrocity akin to the 2019 Christchurch massacre, where Australian-born man Brenton Tarrant opened fire on worshippers at the Al-Noor Mosque and Linwood Islamic Centre, killing 51 people. That account allegedly wrote on the organisation’s Instagram page: “I’m about to christ church 2.0 this joint”. On Tuesday evening NSW Police said the 16-year-old had been arrested in WA following the alleged threat just before 5pm local time and that the teenager was assisting police. “Following a referral from the New South Wales Police Force to the Western Australia Police Force, just before 5.00pm (Western Australia local time), a 16-year-old boy was arrested at Eaton, in south-west Western Australia,” a spokesperson for NSW Police said. “There are no ongoing threats to the community,” the spokesperson said. The teenager is in custody and no charges have been laid.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50707
>>50723
WA teen arrested after ‘heinous’ threat to carry out ‘Christchurch 2.0’ attack on new Sydney mosque
ALEXI DEMETRIADI and LIAM MENDES - March 04, 2025
A teenager from Western Australia has been arrested after a “heinous” threat was allegedly made to a newly opened southwest Sydney mosque, where he allegedly vowed to “christ church 2.0 this joint” just as Australian Muslims prepared for the holy month of Ramadan.
The threat, posted by an Instagram account onto The Australian Islamic House’s page on Monday, vowed to carry out an atrocity akin to the 2019 Christchurch massacre, where Australian-born man Brenton Tarrant opened fire on worshippers at the Al-Noor Mosque and Linwood Islamic Centre, killing 51 people.
That account allegedly wrote on the organisation’s Instagram page: “I’m about to christ church 2.0 this joint”.
On Tuesday evening NSW Police said the 16-year-old had been arrested in WA following the alleged threat just before 5pm local time and that the teenager was assisting police.
“Following a referral from the New South Wales Police Force to the Western Australia Police Force, just before 5.00pm (Western Australia local time), a 16-year-old boy was arrested at Eaton, in south-west Western Australia,” a spokesperson for NSW Police said.
“There are no ongoing threats to the community,” the spokesperson said.
The teenager is in custody and no charges have been laid.
On Tuesday, as news of the threat broke, NSW Premier Chris Minns confirmed that police were conducting a “major police investigation”.
“This (the threat) is very distressing, particularly as Muslims right across the state are participating in prayer during the month of Ramadan,” Mr Minns said.
Anthony Albanese condemned the threat as “abhorrent”, saying it had “no place in Australia”.
“The authorities have my full support as they investigate this matter … Those responsible must face the full force the law,” the Prime Minister said.
The Australian Islamic House runs the Al-Bayt Al-Islami Mosque in Edmondson Park, southwest Sydney, where the organisation’s leaders believe the threat was aimed at.
Australian Islamic House president Mazhar Hadid said the organisation and community was “profoundly concerned” and took the threat with the “utmost seriousness”.
“Our community deserves to feel safe and protected, just like any other citizen of this country,” Mr Hadid said, who was a 16-year Liberal councillor on Liverpool council until September.
“We call on the authorities to treat this matter with the highest urgency and to ensure that all places of worship are safeguarded against such acts of hatred and violence.”
A respected figure, Mr Hadid was awarded a Medal of the Order of Australia in 2024, and has criticised attacks targeting the Jewish community, but also comments from his own party that appeared to speak disparagingly of southwest Sydney Muslims.
The mosque’s leaders said it was initially concerned with the safety of its congregation at the daily night prayers during Ramadan, but that it had been reassured by NSW Police of an increased presence after the threat and was comfortable to open its doors.
The new mosque was decades in the making, only formally opening its doors last week, where 5000 worshippers prayed on the first night of Ramadan.
Multiculturalism Minister Steve Kamper called the threat “heinous”, saying the government and law enforcement would support the community to ensure its safety.
“This threat to our Muslim brothers and sisters is incredibly concerning,” he said.
“Acts designed to intimidate and divide have no place in our society. Importantly, places of worship should always be a safe haven for our community.
“No matter your ethnicity, religion, or country of birth, we are all bound – first and foremost – by our common commitment to each other as Australians.”
NSW Jewish Board of Deputies president David Ossip called the threat “appalling” and “bigoted”, saying it sought to incite fear within the Muslim community.
“A bigoted attack or threat targeted at any group of Australians is an attack on us all,” he said, adding he’d spoken with the Australian National Imams Council to convey his community’s condemnation.
NSW Police said officers from its Liverpool command commenced an investigation on Tuesday when it received a report of Monday’s threat, but that there were “no ongoing threats” and the source of the “christ church 2.0” vow was “interstate”.
“Increased taskings will be conducted by officers as part of Strike Force Pearl,” the police’s statement said.
“It is important that the community and police continue to work together to make NSW a safer place for everyone.”
https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/heinous-threat-to-carry-out-christchurch-20-attack-on-new-sydney-mosque/news-story/1b5ae8156e5962d2292b65937965533d
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50748
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22706035 (050848ZMAR25) Notable: Ukraine peacekeeping offer exposes 'serious' defence capacity limits, experts warn - Australia's ability to help European allies with potential Ukrainian peacekeeping efforts is "looking pretty thin", say military and United Nations operational experts who caution the prime minister's surprise offer to Kiev means the defence budget will need to expand dramatically. Following a top-level National Security Committee meeting with senior ministers on Monday morning, Anthony Albanese on Tuesday unexpectedly opened the door to sending Australian troops to Ukraine. A growing group of European and other nations have formed a "coalition of the willing" to work on a peace plan to present to the United States and Russia. Australia stands "ready to assist" the war-torn nation, Mr Albanese said. "There's a discussion at the moment about potential peacekeeping and from my government's perspective, we're open to consideration of any proposals going forward." While it is understood that a peacekeeping mission to Ukraine is not currently under consideration, it would involve significant additional resources and personnel. "I think it's a seriously bad idea to be sending peacekeeping troops from Australia to Ukraine," said former army chief and University of Canberra professor Peter Leahy. "Operational and tactical issues" as well as the fact that such a mission would be outside Australia's region means its forces would be exposed to threats, including drones. "Our troops would be seriously in peril should we commit them there," he said. "I do see it as out of our region and I do see it as Europe's business."
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50729
>>50731
>>50740
Ukraine peacekeeping offer exposes 'serious' defence capacity limits, experts warn
Jacob Greber and Isobel Roe - 5 March 2025
1/2
Australia's ability to help European allies with potential Ukrainian peacekeeping efforts is "looking pretty thin", say military and United Nations operational experts who caution the prime minister's surprise offer to Kiev means the defence budget will need to expand dramatically.
Following a top-level National Security Committee meeting with senior ministers on Monday morning, Anthony Albanese on Tuesday unexpectedly opened the door to sending Australian troops to Ukraine.
A growing group of European and other nations have formed a "coalition of the willing" to work on a peace plan to present to the United States and Russia.
Australia stands "ready to assist" the war-torn nation, Mr Albanese said.
"There's a discussion at the moment about potential peacekeeping and from my government's perspective, we're open to consideration of any proposals going forward."
The prime minister's remarks follow growing worldwide alarm over a spectacular personal rift between US President Donald Trump and Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelenskyy last week.
However, Mr Albanese's offer has also raised fresh doubts about Australia's capacity to assist with a major new military deployment.
While it is understood that a peacekeeping mission to Ukraine is not currently under consideration, it would involve significant additional resources and personnel.
"I think it's a seriously bad idea to be sending peacekeeping troops from Australia to Ukraine," said former army chief and University of Canberra professor Peter Leahy.
"Operational and tactical issues" as well as the fact that such a mission would be outside Australia's region means its forces would be exposed to threats, including drones.
"Our troops would be seriously in peril should we commit them there," he said.
"I do see it as out of our region and I do see it as Europe's business.
"I also see it as the business of the United States, and that's a disappointment at the moment with what the United States government has chosen to do."
PM's remarks a 'new departure'
Mr Albanese's offer to support Ukraine has crystallised a split between the government and Opposition Leader Peter Dutton, who on Monday ruled out deployment of Australian "boots on the ground".
The prime minister's decision to escalate his solidarity with Europe is a "new departure" that goes beyond his past "pretty cautious and limited" support for Ukraine, said Strategic Analysis Australia director and former senior defence official Peter Jennings.
"More could have been done, but let's put that to one side: if Albanese is prepared to offer more going forward, I think that's a good thing," Mr Jennings said.
"It reflects, ultimately, a key position for Australia, which is that we need to support democracies if they are attacked by autocratic regimes, and so it's entirely sensible for Australia to be supporting Ukraine at this point."
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50749
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22706098 (050930ZMAR25) Notable: Marine officer honored for leadership in aftermath of chaotic Osprey crash - After waking an unconscious Marine inside the flaming wreckage of their MV-22 Osprey, Capt. Joshua C. Watson rallied his Marines and called for accountability. His team had been in the rear of the twin-propeller Osprey as it approached a landing at a remote airfield near Darwin, Australia, when it plummeted to the ground after a near-mid-air collision. As Watson yelled to his Marines to get out, fuel spread and immediately ignited, making the crash site an inferno. Pulling his Marines together, he found that one was in critical condition, another needed immediate care and three were missing. And, Watson realized, his ankle was broken. Watson was awarded the Navy and Marine Corps Medal last week, the Department of the Navy’s highest non-combat award for heroism, for his actions in the 2023 Osprey crash in Australia that killed three. Watson received the award at a ceremony at Naval Air Station Pensacola, Florida. The crash came Aug. 23, 2023, as Watson’s Lima Company prepared to practice seizing two airfields at once. Lima’s commander would lead a force of about 70 Marines on one airfield, while Watson, the company’s executive officer, would lead a smaller force of 38 to take Pickertaramoor Airfield on Melville Island, about 45 miles north of Darwin, Australia. Training in Darwin is a regular rotation for the 1st Marine Expeditionary Force.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Marine officer honored for leadership in aftermath of chaotic Osprey crash
Capt. Joshua C. Watson rallied his Marines after a 2023 Osprey crash, accounting for those missing and evacuating the wounded despite a broken ankle.
MATT WHITE - 5 March 2025
1/2
After waking an unconscious Marine inside the flaming wreckage of their MV-22 Osprey, Capt. Joshua C. Watson rallied his Marines and called for accountability.
His team had been in the rear of the twin-propeller Osprey as it approached a landing at a remote airfield near Darwin, Australia, when it plummeted to the ground after a near-mid-air collision. As Watson yelled to his Marines to get out, fuel spread and immediately ignited, making the crash site an inferno.
Pulling his Marines together, he found that one was in critical condition, another needed immediate care and three were missing.
And, Watson realized, his ankle was broken.
Top non-combat award
Watson was awarded the Navy and Marine Corps Medal last week, the Department of the Navy’s highest non-combat award for heroism, for his actions in the 2023 Osprey crash in Australia that killed three. Watson received the award at a ceremony at Naval Air Station Pensacola, Florida.
The crash came Aug. 23, 2023, as Watson’s Lima Company prepared to practice seizing two airfields at once. Lima’s commander would lead a force of about 70 Marines on one airfield, while Watson, the company’s executive officer, would lead a smaller force of 38 to take Pickertaramoor Airfield on Melville Island, about 45 miles north of Darwin, Australia, according to an after action report Watson wrote that was published on The Connecting File substack. Training in Darwin is a regular rotation for the 1st Marine Expeditionary Force. For the infil, Watson’s 38 Marines were split between two Ospreys.
But as the two aircraft approached the remote airfield, the lead Osprey rapidly slowed down, nearly causing the second plane to run into it in mid-air. The pilots of Watson’s plane veered their Osprey away from the collision but the maneuver, combined with a strong tailwind and the added weight of Watson’s Marines, made the plane uncontrollable and it rapidly fell from the sky.
Watson was one of 19 Marines and one Navy sailor squeezed in the rear of the second Osprey. As the plane began to fall, the crew gave the hand signal to the Marines to “brace,” or lean forward in their seats to absorb a coming impact.
Watson passed the signal and yelled the order to his Marines, but realized that his radio operator was not responding. As the plane descended, Watson grabbed the Marine and shoved him into a brace position.
Then the plane hit.
“Anything that was not strapped down became a projectile flying from the rear to front of the aircraft,” Watson wrote in his report. “I could not see the Marine seated five feet across from me, nor could I see out of the rear ramp of the aircraft. Heavy flames, thick smoke, spraying fluid, dirt, dust, gear, and aircraft wreckage made visibility extremely poor.”
Almost immediately, a fuel leak ignited the ground around the plane.
“The heat from the fire was overwhelming,” Watson wrote. “The only light piercing through the smoke came from the rear of the aircraft and this soon became the primary exit.”
In the shock of the moment, many of the Marines did not immediately move.
“After noticing that nobody was really moving, I directed the Marines to ‘leave everything and get out the back of the aircraft,’” Watson said in a Marine Corps news release.
As the platoon began to pile out of the rear of the plane, Watson saw that his radio operator was not moving. He shook him until he awoke and got him moving towards the exit.
“As I unstrapped and untangled myself, I began to pass off my radio operator to another Marine towards the rear exit,” Watson said. Then, alone, he checked the rest of the burning plane, looking under the troop seats, for others who might have been out cold.
“I went to ensure no one remained trapped,” he said.
As he left, though, he encountered a remarkable sight: one of the Osprey’s crew chiefs was pinned under the plane’s ramp as flames rapidly engulfed the wreckage.
“Still standing at the rear of the aircraft from which the fire was rapidly spreading, I witnessed the rear member of the aircrew who was pinned underneath the fuselage of the plane and severely injured, being cut free and buddy dragged to safety by my Marines who had come back to his rescue,” Watson wrote in the report.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50750
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22712510 (060833ZMAR25) Notable: Anti-woke warrior Alex Antic welcomes Liberals’ step to the right - The world has reached “peak woke” and the times now suit conservatives who put their views with pride, Liberal senator Alex Antic has declared on his ascent to the No.1 position on the South Australian Senate ticket. Long dismissed by detractors as a political fringe-dweller and polarising force, the rise of Antic is a powerful demonstration of the changing face of the South Australian Liberal Party. With the sudden resignation of veteran minister and moderate Simon Birmingham, Antic is now the most prominent federal Liberal in SA after successfully rolling opposition frontbencher Anne Ruston for the top spot in a preselection battle last year. His elevation confirms the new complexion of the SA Liberal Party as no longer the moderate stronghold of figures such as Birmingham, former defence minister Christopher Pyne, one-term Liberal premier Steven Marshall and his deputy and attorney-general Vickie Chapman. Indeed, it was the small-l liberal ethos of the Marshall government that helped drive a surge in grassroots conservative membership, many of them people with faith-based backgrounds outraged by Liberal support for euthanasia and late-term abortion. Antic is reluctant to re-prosecute past wars with the party’s Left, but says the broadening of the party’s membership base has the SA division in what he describes as “great shape”. “What we are doing is bringing Liberals back to the Liberal Party,” Antic told The Australian. “We have seen over the last five years really true Liberals coming back to the party in droves. The party is in the best shape it’s been in years.”
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50708
Anti-woke warrior Alex Antic welcomes Liberals’ step to the right
DAVID PENBERTHY - 5 March 2025
1/2
The world has reached “peak woke” and the times now suit conservatives who put their views with pride, Liberal senator Alex Antic has declared on his ascent to the No.1 position on the South Australian Senate ticket.
Long dismissed by detractors as a political fringe-dweller and polarising force, the rise of Antic is a powerful demonstration of the changing face of the South Australian Liberal Party.
With the sudden resignation of veteran minister and moderate Simon Birmingham, Antic is now the most prominent federal Liberal in SA after successfully rolling opposition frontbencher Anne Ruston for the top spot in a preselection battle last year.
His elevation confirms the new complexion of the SA Liberal Party as no longer the moderate stronghold of figures such as Birmingham, former defence minister Christopher Pyne, one-term Liberal premier Steven Marshall and his deputy and attorney-general Vickie Chapman.
Indeed, it was the small-l liberal ethos of the Marshall government that helped drive a surge in grassroots conservative membership, many of them people with faith-based backgrounds outraged by Liberal support for euthanasia and late-term abortion.
Antic is reluctant to re-prosecute past wars with the party’s Left, but says the broadening of the party’s membership base has the SA division in what he describes as “great shape”.
“What we are doing is bringing Liberals back to the Liberal Party,” Antic told The Australian.
“We have seen over the last five years really true Liberals coming back to the party in droves. The party is in the best shape it’s been in years. Social conservatives and libertarians are joining for the reasons Menzies intended – having passionate, energetic people determined to have the Liberal Party thrive.
“What we are seeing is a real injection of enthusiasm, as much as anything else. The age demographic is coming down. We are engaging with families who are concerned about social issues, and younger people who are concerned about economic issues. Overall, it’s an incredibly positive thing for the party.”
Antic, 50, is a married father of two and former lawyer who came to politics through local government, serving as an Adelaide City councillor, where he was outspoken in defence of January 26 as Australia Day.
He faced calls from some moderates for his expulsion from the party during the Morrison government when he and four other Liberals sided with One Nation against vaccination mandates.
He was bailed up by SA Health officials and police at Adelaide Airport in 2021 after refusing to reveal his vaccination status, spending 14 days in a medi-hotel where he filmed a video saying he would not be coerced into answering questions by “bureaucratic overlords”.
But with one eye on Washington, Antic said he felt the world had changed significantly and quickly, and that people wanted politicians to stand up to bureaucracy and big government.
“We have reached peak woke and are now coming out the other side,” he said.
“When people can’t pay their mortgages and are being yelled at by the establishment that they have to use paper straws, the tide is going to turn.
“That’s never more apparent than it is at the moment. We saw the defeat of the voice referendum in 2023. That was a definitive moment in Australian history. It showed that no matter how much government, big business, sporting codes, local councils, universities and even the media support an issue, mainstream Australia supports the values of fairness and democracy that have defined the nation.”
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50751
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22718818 (071203ZMAR25) Notable: New Zealand’s Most Senior Diplomat in the UK Ousted After Mocking President Trump - Phil Goff, New Zealand’s high commissioner to the U.K. and his country’s most senior diplomat in London, was fired for comments mocking President Donald Trump at a London think tank event at Chatham House. During remarks, he shared Winston Churchill’s speech from 1938 in which the British powerhouse blasted then-Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain and his decision to sign the Munich Agreement with Adolf Hitler. Goff smugly said to Finnish Foreign Minister Elina Valtonen, “President Trump has restored the bust of Churchill to the Oval Office.” Goff then condescendingly asked, “But do you think he really understands history?,” Goff was clearly referencing the tension that erupted in the Oval Office between Trump and an ill-behaved and unappreciative Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy. Valtonen dodged the attempt to criticize Trump alltogether and instead remarked that Churchill’s remarks were “timeless.” New Zealand Foreign Minister Winston Peters fired Goff and, in remarks to the press, called the diplomat’s question “deeply disappointing.” He added that it made Goff’s position as high commissioner to London ‘untenable.”
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
General Research #27755
New Zealand’s Most Senior Diplomat in the UK Ousted After Mocking President Trump
Phil Goff, New Zealand’s high commissioner to the U.K. and his country’s most senior diplomat in London, was fired for comments mocking President Donald Trump at a London think tank event at Chatham House.
During remarks, he shared Winston Churchill’s speech from 1938 in which the British powerhouse blasted then-Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain and his decision to sign the Munich Agreement with Adolf Hitler.
Goff smugly said to Finnish Foreign Minister Elina Valtonen, “President Trump has restored the bust of Churchill to the Oval Office.”
Goff then condescendingly asked, “But do you think he really understands history?,”
Goff was clearly referencing the tension that erupted in the Oval Office between Trump and an ill-behaved and unappreciative Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy.
Valtonen dodged the attempt to criticize Trump alltogether and instead remarked that Churchill’s remarks were “timeless.”
New Zealand Foreign Minister Winston Peters fired Goff and, in remarks to the press, called the diplomat’s question “deeply disappointing.”
He added that it made Goff’s position as high commissioner to London ‘untenable.”
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2025/03/new-zealands-most-senior-diplomat-uk-ousted-after/
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50752
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22722935 (080225ZMAR25) Notable: Video: Accused Woollahra anti-Semite arson and graffiti attacker Thomas Stojanovski out on bail - A man alleged to have committed an arson and vandalism attack in which anti-Semitic slurs were graffitied on vehicles and restaurants in a prominent Jewish neighbourhood in Sydney had less to say when released on bail on Thursday. Thomas Stojanovski, 20, appeared to smirk when asked questions about his alleged involvement in the “racially motivated” attack where a large number of cars at Woollahra, in Sydney’s east, were spray-painted with the words “f*k Israel” and “PKK is coming”, causing an estimated $100,000 worth of damage. It is the first time an individual before the court, alleged to be behind one of several anti-Semitic attacks that have hit Sydney’s eastern suburbs and have struck fear into the hearts of Jewish Australians across the country, has been questioned about their alleged actions. After spending more than three months in custody on remand, Mr Stojanovski was granted bail on Wednesday by Supreme Court Justice Julia Lonergan, with conditions including that he abide by house arrest, but he was released on Thursday. Escorted by his father from the maximum security section of Parklea correctional centre in Sydney’s northwest, Mr Stojanovski said he would not comment on what has been described as a “racially motivated hate crime”.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>>/qresearch/22416604 (pb)
>>50707
Accused Woollahra anti-Semite arson and graffiti attacker Thomas Stojanovski out on bail
LIAM MENDES - March 06, 2025
A man alleged to have committed an arson and vandalism attack in which anti-Semitic slurs were graffitied on vehicles and restaurants in a prominent Jewish neighbourhood in Sydney had less to say when released on bail on Thursday.
Thomas Stojanovski, 20, appeared to smirk when asked questions about his alleged involvement in the “racially motivated” attack where a large number of cars at Woollahra, in Sydney’s east, were spray-painted with the words “f*k Israel” and “PKK is coming”, causing an estimated $100,000 worth of damage.
It is the first time an individual before the court, alleged to be behind one of several anti-Semitic attacks that have hit Sydney’s eastern suburbs and have struck fear into the hearts of Jewish Australians across the country, has been questioned about their alleged actions.
After spending more than three months in custody on remand, Mr Stojanovski was granted bail on Wednesday by Supreme Court Justice Julia Lonergan, with conditions including that he abide by house arrest, but he was released on Thursday.
Escorted by his father from the maximum security section of Parklea correctional centre in Sydney’s northwest, Mr Stojanovski said he would not comment on what has been described as a “racially motivated hate crime”.
Dressed in the same music festival tank top and shorts he was wearing at the time of his arrest in November 2024 and clutching a Bible, Mr Stojanovski refused to answer questions, including whether he was behind the attacks, was an anti-Semite or hated the state of Israel.
He was arrested at his Arncliffe home in southern Sydney a week after the attack and charged with 21 offences, including 14 counts of destroying or damaging property, three counts of entering land with intent to commit an indictable offence and two counts of destroying property using fire.
Video from the evening, obtained by The Australian at the time, appeared to show two hooded figures at the scene with one appearing to be carrying a bag or jerry can.
On Wednesday the Crown prosecution argued that Mr Stojanovski was one of two men captured on separate CCTV footage during the attack and could be identified by a cast on his left wrist, NCA NewsWire reported.
At the time of his arrest he had a cast on his left arm but it has since been removed.
The court heard Mr Stojanovski and an accomplice allegedly arrived in a vehicle that they abandoned and departed in an Uber, and one man could be seen spray-painting their targets while another held a torch and acted as a lookout.
Justice Lonergan said she was satisfied that the risks posed by Mr Stojanovski could be addressed by strict bail conditions.
She noted his case might not be finalised for nine to 18 months, and his representatives said the case was weak.
https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/accused-woollahra-antisemite-arson-and-graffiti-attacker-thomas-stojanovski-out-on-bail/news-story/e220edec19197a25278dd93d3158ba77
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50753
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22723069 (080257ZMAR25) Notable: Burgertory owner Hash Tayeh charged for pro-Palestine rally chants - Burgertory restaurant chain owner Hash Tayeh has been charged with using insulting words in public for a chant at a pro-Palestine rally in the CBD last year. Tayeh, who has become a prominent leader of the protest movement after the Hamas attacks in Israel on October 7, 2023, and Israel’s 15-month war on Gaza, repeatedly said “all Zionists are terrorists”. On Friday, police charged Tayeh with four counts of “using insulting words in public” for uttering the statement four times during a May rally. The punishment is up to two months in prison for a first offence and six months for three or more offences. It is believed to be the first time that potential political speech has been deemed a criminal offence that breached the “insulting” law. The charges are normally levied for using abusive or obscene language against police officers. Tayeh told The Age he would “fight these charges with everything I have”. “I have never supported the harming or killing of men, women, and children - no matter their faith or background,” he said. “Standing against the loss of innocent lives is not just a political stance; it is a moral obligation. No innocent person deserves to die, and I will fight these charges with everything I have. I will take this battle as far as necessary because speaking out against injustice is not just a right - it is a duty. Criticising a regime that commits acts of terror is not a crime. It is a fundamental right, a cornerstone of democracy, and political censorship has no place in Australia.”
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>>/qresearch/22604566 (pb)
>>50707
Burgertory owner Hash Tayeh charged for pro-Palestine rally chants
Chris Vedelago - March 7, 2025
Burgertory restaurant chain owner Hash Tayeh has been charged with using insulting words in public for a chant at a pro-Palestine rally in the CBD last year.
Tayeh, who has become a prominent leader of the protest movement after the Hamas attacks in Israel on October 7, 2023, and Israel’s 15-month war on Gaza, repeatedly said “all Zionists are terrorists”.
On Friday, police charged Tayeh with four counts of “using insulting words in public” for uttering the statement four times during a May rally.
The punishment is up to two months in prison for a first offence and six months for three or more offences.
It is believed to be the first time that potential political speech has been deemed a criminal offence that breached the “insulting” law. The charges are normally levied for using abusive or obscene language against police officers.
Tayeh told The Age he would “fight these charges with everything I have”.
“I have never supported the harming or killing of men, women, and children – no matter their faith or background,” he said. “Standing against the loss of innocent lives is not just a political stance; it is a moral obligation.
“No innocent person deserves to die, and I will fight these charges with everything I have. I will take this battle as far as necessary because speaking out against injustice is not just a right – it is a duty.
“Criticising a regime that commits acts of terror is not a crime. It is a fundamental right, a cornerstone of democracy, and political censorship has no place in Australia.”
Last year, Tayeh was arrested but not charged over allegations of “incitement” of hatred against Jewish people that violated the Racial and Religious Tolerance Act during the weekly protests, which were wound back to monthly rallies after 71 straight weeks.
There has been a growing push to criminalise the phrase “All Zionists are terrorists”.
Federal Attorney-General Mark Dreyfus has said: “The label Zionist is used, not in any way, accurately. When critics use that word, they actually mean Jew. They’re not really saying Zionist, they’re saying Jew because they know that they cannot say Jew, so they say Zionist or words [such as] Zeo or Zio.”
Zeddy Lawrence, executive director of Zionism Victoria, said: “Given the overwhelming majority of Jews in Victoria, Australia and, indeed, the world would identify as Zionists, besmirching the latter is akin to painting a target on the former. And tragically the spike in antisemitism on these shores, which has shamed Australia globally, is indicative of where misrepresenting the truth about Zionism can lead.”
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50754
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22723254 (080351ZMAR25) Notable: Video: Prime Minister Anthony Albanese won’t call election for April 12 as Cyclone Alfred approaches - Anthony Albanese has ruled out calling an election this weekend as Tropical Cyclone Alfred causes havoc in northern NSW and southeastern Queensland, with voters to go to the polls in May. Before the onset of Alfred, the Prime Minister had been expected to call the election this weekend for April 12, straight after Saturday’s Western Australian state election. In an interview on 7.30 on Friday night, host Sarah Ferguson asked Mr Albanese if he was “categorically” ruling out calling the election on Sunday or Monday. “That’s correct,” he said. “I have no intention of doing anything that distracts from what we need to do. This is not a time for looking at politics. My sole focus is not calling an election, my sole focus is on the needs of Australians, that is my sole focus.” Mr Albanese has been asked a number of times over the week whether he would delay calling the election due to the cyclone. He had batted away the questions saying he was focused on the government’s response to Alfred. The decision not to go ahead with an election on April 12 means the federal budget will now be handed down as scheduled on March 25. It is understood the PM on Friday finalised decided on the change of plans and to go ahead with the budget in just over two weeks.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50708
>>50743
Prime Minister Anthony Albanese won’t call election for April 12 as Cyclone Alfred approaches
Anthony Albanese says now is not the time for politics as millions face the onslaught of Tropical Cyclone Alfred, ending speculation he will call the election this weekend.
Joanne Williamson - March 7, 2025
Anthony Albanese has ruled out calling an election this weekend as Tropical Cyclone Alfred causes havoc in northern NSW and southeastern Queensland, with voters to go to the polls in May.
Before the onset of Alfred, the Prime Minister had been expected to call the election this weekend for April 12, straight after Saturday’s Western Australian state election.
In an interview on 7.30 on Friday night, host Sarah Ferguson asked Mr Albanese if he was “categorically” ruling out calling the election on Sunday or Monday.
“That’s correct,” he said.
“I have no intention of doing anything that distracts from what we need to do.
“This is not a time for looking at politics.
“My sole focus is not calling an election, my sole focus is on the needs of Australians, that is my sole focus.”
Mr Albanese has been asked a number of times over the week whether he would delay calling the election due to the cyclone.
He had batted away the questions saying he was focused on the government’s response to Alfred.
The decision not to go ahead with an election on April 12 means the federal budget will now be handed down as scheduled on March 25.
It is understood the PM on Friday finalised decided on the change of plans and to go ahead with the budget in just over two weeks.
Treasurer Jim Chalmers has consistently said work had been proceeding on the budget, despite expectations of an election being called beforehand.
Opposition Leader Peter Dutton had this week said the Prime Minister would “have to have a tin ear” to begin campaigning during a natural disaster.
Mr Dutton, whose outer northern Brisbane electorate of Dickson could be hit with 130km/h winds and storm surges, said he would be surprised if the Prime Minister called the election this weekend.
“There will be people waiting for waters to recede, there will be swift water rescues, there will be people cleaning out their houses or their businesses, and some people will have lost everything,” Mr Dutton told Brisbane radio station 4BC on Wednesday.
“That’s the reality of these weather events, and to go to election at that stage, at that time, I think the Prime Minister would have a tin ear to do that.”
The Easter and Anzac Day long weekends rule out April 19 and April 26 as prospective election dates.
Mr Albanese has just three election dates to choose from – May 3, May 10 or May 17, the latest possible day the government can hold a general election.
Tropical Cyclone Alfred is now not expected make landfall around Brisbane until midmorning Saturday, with the Sunshine Coast, Brisbane, Gold Coast and northern NSW to be hit.
The category 2 storm is already causing high winds, heavy rains, huge swells and flooding in many areas, with the expectation of ongoing flooding over many areas over the next week.
Mr Albanese has described the situation as “very serious”.
“When you speak about a tropical cyclone crossing over and hitting land where over four million Australians live, then that’s pretty serious,” he told 7.30.
“That’s why we’re doing everything possible and mobilising every level of support that we can, both civil and military.”
https://www.news.com.au/national/politics/prime-minister-anthony-albanese-wont-call-election-for-april-12-as-cyclone-alfred-approaches/news-story/04c3d05d025982a361cef71e08af7493
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-03-07/federal-government-to-hand-down-budget/105024394
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50755
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22723272 (080356ZMAR25) Notable: Video: Monique Ryan, husband apologise after he is filmed removing Liberal sign - Teal MP Monique Ryan and her husband Peter Jordan have apologised after he was filmed removing a sign backing local Liberal candidate Amelia Hamer, marking the highest profile incident in a tit-for-tat signage war in the battleground seat of Kooyong. Videos obtained by this masthead show two youths slashing a Liberal sign to “humiliate” a homeowner while Ryan posters have been defaced with markers as the increasingly intense contest defies the affluent east Melbourne seat’s genteel character and some incidents end up in court. Ryan, who campaigned on restoring integrity to politics, and her husband both apologised for his behaviour on Saturday. “I unreservedly apologise for removing the sign,” Jordan said in a statement after video of the encounter was revealed by The Age and The Sydney Morning Herald on Monday. “It was a mistake. I believed the sign was illegally placed but should have reported my concerns to council.” The footage of Jordan shows the MP’s husband walking briskly away with Hamer’s placard under his arm down a street in Camberwell as the person filming asks a series of questions. “I’m taking the sign down,” Jordan says in the video. When asked why, he says: “it’s on public land”. Jordan is asked repeatedly who he is by the man filming, who notes Jordan is wearing a teal shirt underneath his jumper. “I’m not saying who I am,” Jordan responds. At one point, the man attempts to take the sign away from Jordan on the basis that it remains his property. Jordan pulls it back, saying: “if it goes back up, it’ll be taken down again”. “It’s an illegally put up sign, anyone can take [it] down because it’s illegal.” Jordan, who is an executive at a medical device company, eventually surrenders the sign. Ryan echoed her husband’s apology for removing the sign. “It should not have happened,” she said. “All concerns around signage should be reported to council.”
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50708
>>50743
>>50754
Labor sets up energy bill relief in March budget for May election
David Crowe - March 7, 2025
1/2
A surprise revenue gain is giving Labor more options to help households in the federal budget to be delivered on March 25, creating room for a new round of energy bill relief before an election that will be held in May.
Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has confirmed the budget date and election plan after top cabinet ministers signed off on major policies, intensifying a contest on economic policy with Opposition Leader Peter Dutton.
Albanese and senior colleagues decided on Friday to confirm the government’s stated plan to release the budget on March 25 and head to the election in the first weeks of May, after Cyclone Alfred ruled out the option of an earlier election.
The prime minister went public with the plan on the 7.30 program on the ABC on Friday night when host Sarah Ferguson asked him if he was “categorically” ruling out calling the election on Sunday or Monday.
“That’s correct,” he said. “I have no intention of doing anything that distracts from what we need to do, and what we need to do is look after each other at this difficult time. This is not a time for looking at politics.”
Federal cabinet’s expenditure review committee has completed most of its work on the budget policies, which have been subjected to full Treasury costings, so Treasurer Jim Chalmers and Finance Minister Katy Gallagher have authority to finalise the measures with Albanese.
Independent economist Chris Richardson has estimated the revenue gains will be worth $24.3 billion over two years, but this is strongly disputed within the government because Treasury has a more cautious outlook and is yet to adjust its forecasts.
The federal energy subsidy – which gave every household $300 for electricity bills over this financial year – is a key issue for the campaign because millions of voters would receive a final $75 payment at the end of June if the government does not extend the $3.5 billion package.
The cabinet decisions clear the way for another round of assistance, but the government is yet to decide whether the energy package will be the centrepiece of the budget or held for an announcement during the election campaign.
Chalmers has named the energy bill relief as a major reason for voters to reject the Coalition at the ballot box, given the Liberals and Nationals voted against it when parliament approved the package.
The moves follow a flurry of Labor measures since the start of the year, including an $8.5 billion boost to bulk-billing through Medicare, the funding of 50 urgent-care clinics to ease pressure on hospitals, more than $7 billion for public schools and decisions to fund major roads.
Dutton has cited the spending as a reason for voters to throw Labor out of office, saying the Coalition would cut government waste and improve the budget bottom line.
An election in May could be costly for Labor, as television and radio advertising has been booked and some staff have paid for four weeks of accommodation around the Sydney office where the party’s election headquarters are based.
Media advertising buyers who book slots for Labor are actively talking about changing the dates of Labor’s advertising bookings as a contingency if the election is in May rather than April, according to advertising industry and political sources.
Senior figures believe the government’s position is improving because Albanese and Chalmers can point to good news on four economic factors: the recent cut to official interest rates; lower inflation; good unemployment results; and the economic growth revealed on Wednesday.
A YouGov poll published on Friday showed Labor was in front of the Coalition, mirroring Labor research that showed the party gaining ground following a rate cut and an $8.5 billion Medicare announcement. Coalition sources disputed any significant rise for Labor in recent weeks, while the Resolve Political Monitor in this masthead showed last month that the Coalition was up 52 to 48 per cent in two-party terms.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50756
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22723834 (080639ZMAR25) Notable: Don Farrell’s US trade mission shelved as Labor eyes election - Trade Minister Don Farrell has put on hold a planned US trip to seek an exemption from Donald Trump’s steel and aluminium tariffs as Labor prepares to shift into election mode, leaving Australia’s ambassador Kevin Rudd to plead the nation’s case. Dr Rudd was due to meet Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick early on Saturday morning AEDT, but Australia’s hopes for a carve-out were dealt a blow when President Trump declared his metals tariffs were on track to be implemented on Wednesday without modification. Mr Trump issued the warning as he delivered another reprieve for Canada and Mexico, exempting imports that comply with the United States-Mexico-Canada-agreement from his threatened 25 per cent tariffs until at least April 2. Mr Farrell had said he would travel to the US for talks with Mr Lutnick after his counterpart’s appointment was confirmed by the Senate, which happened more than a fortnight ago. But the planned trip was sidelined by Senate estimates hearings in the last week of February, and Treasurer Jim Chalmers’ recent visit to Washington, when he urged US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent to spare Australian steel and aluminium exporters from the planned 25 per cent duties. It’s understood Mr Farrell will see what comes of Mr Lutnick’s meeting with Dr Rudd before deciding whether to make the trip. Opposition trade spokesman Kevin Hogan said he was disappointed neither Mr Farrell nor the Prime Minister had travelled to travelled to Washington to make Australia’s case.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50708
>>50755
>>50725
Don Farrell’s US trade mission shelved as Labor eyes election
BEN PACKHAM and JOE KELLY - March 07, 2025
1/2
Trade Minister Don Farrell has put on hold a planned US trip to seek an exemption from Donald Trump’s steel and aluminium tariffs as Labor prepares to shift into election mode, leaving Australia’s ambassador Kevin Rudd to plead the nation’s case.
Dr Rudd was due to meet Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick early on Saturday morning AEDT, but Australia’s hopes for a carve-out were dealt a blow when President Trump declared his metals tariffs were on track to be implemented on Wednesday without modification.
Mr Trump issued the warning as he delivered another reprieve for Canada and Mexico, exempting imports that comply with the United States-Mexico-Canada-agreement from his threatened 25 per cent tariffs until at least April 2.
It came as Anthony Albanese accused the Coalition of undermining the national interest with “nonsense and cheering against Australia’s position”.
He levelled the charge after opposition foreign affairs spokesman David Coleman argued Australia had an even stronger case to secure a tariff exemption than it did in 2018, when Malcolm Turnbull secured a carve-out from Mr Trump’s first-term steel and aluminium levies.
Mr Coleman said the nation’s investments in American military hardware under AUKUS and its substantial trade deficit with the US should secure special treatment for Australia.
Mr Trump previously declared he would give “great consideration” to an exemption for Australia.
Mr Farrell had said he would travel to the US for talks with Mr Lutnick after his counterpart’s appointment was confirmed by the Senate, which happened more than a fortnight ago.
But the planned trip was sidelined by Senate estimates hearings in the last week of February, and Treasurer Jim Chalmers’ recent visit to Washington, when he urged US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent to spare Australian steel and aluminium exporters from the planned 25 per cent duties.
It’s understood Mr Farrell will see what comes of Mr Lutnick’s meeting with Dr Rudd before deciding whether to make the trip.
Opposition trade spokesman Kevin Hogan said he was disappointed neither Mr Farrell nor the Prime Minister had travelled to travelled to Washington to make Australia’s case.
President Trump’s latest change to his tariff settings came just days after he granted the big three American automakers – Stellantis, Ford and General Motors – a one-month exemption from his 25 per cent tariffs on Mexico and Canada, which commenced on March 4.
The vast majority of goods exported to the United States by Canada and Mexico fall under the USMCA. The April 2 expiration date for the exemption is significant because it also marks the start date for Mr Trump’s broader reciprocal tariff regime.
The carve-outs announced by Mr Trump failed to quell the markets, which have plunged on concerns over his tariff plans.
The Nasdaq Composite fell by more than 2.6 per cent on Thursday local time, and the S & P 500 dropped by nearly 1.8 per cent, with Mr Trump blaming the trend on “globalist companies” that stood to lose out under his policies.
Speaking at the White House, Mr Trump said his decision to provide an exemption for goods under the USMCA had “nothing to do with the market. I’m not even looking at the market”.
“We’ve been treated very unfairly as a country. We protect everybody. We do everything for all these countries and a lot of these are globalist in nature,” Mr Trump said on Friday AEDT. “We have globalist companies that have been ripping us off that won’t be able to rip us off any longer.”
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50757
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22723852 (080644ZMAR25) Notable: Rudd’s crunch talks on tariffs as Trump sows more trade chaos - Australia’s ambassador to the United States, Kevin Rudd, will make a last-ditch personal plea to Donald Trump’s Commerce Secretary to spare Australian steel and aluminium producers from tariffs, despite the president’s insistence the 25 per cent duties will go ahead. Trump reiterated that the tariff on all steel and aluminium imported into the US would come into effect on March 12, even as he sparked fresh confusion by delaying the start of sweeping tariffs on some Mexican and Canadian exports. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said on Friday that Australia would continue to lobby the US government to be exempted from the steel and aluminium tariffs. He accused the Opposition of “not cheering for Australia” and undermining efforts to secure a carve-out by criticising the government’s approach. “We’ll continue to put our case to our friends in the United States,” Albanese said at a press conference as he insisted his immediate focus was on the response to Cyclone Alfred. Rudd was due to meet US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick overnight, the second meeting the pair have had in the past fortnight. To bolster Australia’s lobbying efforts, the government has also dispatched its top trade bureaucrat, George Mina, to Washington to join the talks.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50708
>>50725
>>50756
Rudd’s crunch talks on tariffs as Trump sows more trade chaos
Andrew Tillett and Jessica Sier - Mar 7, 2025
1/2
Australia’s ambassador to the United States, Kevin Rudd, will make a last-ditch personal plea to Donald Trump’s Commerce Secretary to spare Australian steel and aluminium producers from tariffs, despite the president’s insistence the 25 per cent duties will go ahead.
Trump reiterated that the tariff on all steel and aluminium imported into the US would come into effect on March 12, even as he sparked fresh confusion by delaying the start of sweeping tariffs on some Mexican and Canadian exports.
The president’s flip-flopping on tariffs spooked investors globally, with a sell-off on Wall Street, while Australia’s S&P/ASX 200 Index fell below 8000, its lowest level in six months, after shedding 1.3 per cent.
“I’m not even looking at the market, because long term, the United States will be very strong with what’s happening here,” Trump said.
Trump is unleashing a global trade war through the use of tariffs, which he argues will revive US manufacturing, boost US tax revenue and stop foreign countries “ripping off” the US by running trade surpluses.
Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said on Friday that Australia would continue to lobby the US government to be exempted from the steel and aluminium tariffs. He accused the Opposition of “not cheering for Australia” and undermining efforts to secure a carve-out by criticising the government’s approach.
“We’ll continue to put our case to our friends in the United States,” Albanese said at a press conference as he insisted his immediate focus was on the response to Cyclone Alfred.
Rudd was due to meet US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick overnight, the second meeting the pair have had in the past fortnight. To bolster Australia’s lobbying efforts, the government has also dispatched its top trade bureaucrat, George Mina, to Washington to join the talks.
Trump increased the tariff on Chinese goods by 20 per cent this week, and slugged a 25 per cent rate on Canadian and Mexican exports, triggering retaliatory duties and heightening fears of a global rush to protectionism.
But in the fast-moving world of the Trump White House, the president on Thursday (Friday AEDT) signed an executive order granting a month-long stay on imposing tariffs on goods covered by the three-way North American free trade pact. That affects about half of exports from Mexico and a third from Canada.
The pause is in place until April 2, when Trump has threatened to impose across-the-board tariffs on a wider range of trading partners.
China warned on Friday of further retaliation against Trump’s “arbitrary tariffs” and accused Washington of being “two-faced” in trying to develop its relationship with China.
Foreign Minister Wang Yi also accused Washington of “meeting good with evil” on the sidelines of the country’s annual parliamentary session, as relations between the two superpowers took a sharp turn for the worse.
Wang told a press conference in Beijing that China’s efforts to help the US contain its fentanyl crisis have been met with punitive tariffs, which are straining the ties between the countries.
“No country should fantasise that it can suppress China and maintain good relationship with China at the same time,” Wang said. “Such two-faced acts are not good for the stability of bilateral relations or for building mutual trust.”
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50758
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22723901 (080659ZMAR25) Notable: NT Police Association calls for commissioner Michael Murphy to resign following ICAC findings - The Northern Territory police union is calling for Police Commissioner Michael Murphy to resign after he revealed himself as the subject of an anti-corruption commission finding. In late February, the NT's Independent Commissioner Against Corruption (ICAC) made a finding of improper and unsatisfactory conduct against an unnamed senior public official, who the ICAC said had mismanaged a conflict of interest. "I found that the conduct involved negligence and incompetence," ICAC delegate Patricia Kelly SC said. The ICAC report revealed that in early 2024, the unnamed public officer had helped a good friend get a senior position within their department, and sat on the panel that hired him. Commissioner Murphy revealed himself as the senior public officer on Thursday, releasing a statement explaining his actions. "I accept that I should have dealt better with a conflict of interest, a friendship and a referee report in relation to an appointee," he said. "On reflection, I should have managed the friendship and the conflict of interest to a higher standard and on at least one occasion should have recused myself from the appointment process in order to ensure community confidence." The ABC understands the person who applied and won the job is Assistant Commissioner Peter Kennon.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
NT Police Association calls for commissioner Michael Murphy to resign following ICAC findings
Jack Hislop and Matt Garrick - 7 March 2025
1/2
The Northern Territory police union is calling for Police Commissioner Michael Murphy to resign after he revealed himself as the subject of an anti-corruption commission finding.
In late February, the NT's Independent Commissioner Against Corruption (ICAC) made a finding of improper and unsatisfactory conduct against an unnamed senior public official, who the ICAC said had mismanaged a conflict of interest.
"I found that the conduct involved negligence and incompetence," ICAC delegate Patricia Kelly SC said.
The ICAC report revealed that in early 2024, the unnamed public officer had helped a good friend get a senior position within their department, and sat on the panel that hired him.
Commissioner Murphy revealed himself as the senior public officer on Thursday, releasing a statement explaining his actions.
"I accept that I should have dealt better with a conflict of interest, a friendship and a referee report in relation to an appointee," he said.
"On reflection, I should have managed the friendship and the conflict of interest to a higher standard and on at least one occasion should have recused myself from the appointment process in order to ensure community confidence."
The ABC understands the person who applied and won the job is Assistant Commissioner Peter Kennon.
The ABC is not suggesting any wrongdoing by Assistant Commissioner Kennon.
The Northern Territory Police Association (NTPA) has since called for Commissioner Murphy to resign.
"The entire executive board of the Northern Territory Police Association is unanimously calling upon the Commissioner to tender his resignation," NTPA president Nathan Finn said in a statement.
"The trust of our members in this commissioner is now destroyed.
"Our members will not forget this betrayal and question his ability to continue."
Mr Finn said the ICAC report had "triggered deep anger and frustration" within the NTPA membership.
"[It] brings into disrepute the whole police force," he said.
"Our members are fed up with the lack of integrity shown and question the commissioner's ability to remain in his position.
"We are calling out the commissioner's integrity with his involvement in not only this executive appointment, but for all of the other executive appointments referred to in the commissioner's broadcast of [Thursday]."
In his statement on Thursday, Commissioner Murphy said almost 30 high-level NT police appointments made in the last 12 months had been "awarded to the most meritorious and best candidates".
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50759
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22723970 (080723ZMAR25) Notable: Geelong police work to unmask Nazi saluting soccer fans - Geelong leaders have slammed a group of local soccer fans who performed the Nazi salute at a Bell Park venue on the weekend, as the club distances itself from their confronting actions. The shocking image, allegedly of North Geelong Warriors Football Club supporters, was taken at the Croatian Club on Separation St and emerged on social media Tuesday evening. A group of men, all wearing black, posed in the venue’s smoking area. The majority of those pictured were performing the illegal gesture, while all had their faces covered digitally with a logo featuring the Croatian flag. North Geelong Warriors promptly issued a statement via social media condemning the behaviour, while president Tom Pausak further distanced the club from the actions. “I want to be clear that these people are not our supporters,” he said. “It’s not who we are, or what we stand for. It will be dealt with by Victoria Police.” Deputy Prime Minister and Corio MP Richard Marles condemned the behaviour, which he said was “not a representation of Geelong as we all know it”. “The North Geelong Warriors have been swift in their condemnation of this group, rightly calling out this appalling behaviour,” he said.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>>/qresearch/22521601 (pb)
>>50707
Geelong police work to unmask Nazi saluting soccer fans
Geelong Police have received CCTV footage which could be key in unmasking soccer fans who performed Nazi salutes in Bell Park.
Will Keech - February 13, 2025
Geelong leaders have slammed a group of local soccer fans who performed the Nazi salute at a Bell Park venue on the weekend, as the club distances itself from their confronting actions.
The shocking image, allegedly of North Geelong Warriors Football Club supporters, was taken at the Croatian Club on Separation St and emerged on social media Tuesday evening.
A group of men, all wearing black, posed in the venue’s smoking area.
The majority of those pictured were performing the illegal gesture, while all had their faces covered digitally with a logo featuring the Croatian flag.
North Geelong Warriors promptly issued a statement via social media condemning the behaviour, while president Tom Pausak further distanced the club from the actions.
“I want to be clear that these people are not our supporters,” he said.
“It’s not who we are, or what we stand for.
“It will be dealt with by Victoria Police.”
Football Victoria are understood to be investigating the matter but did not respond to questions before deadline, despite multiple attempts.
Deputy Prime Minister and Corio MP Richard Marles condemned the behaviour, which he said was “not a representation of Geelong as we all know it”.
“The North Geelong Warriors have been swift in their condemnation of this group, rightly calling out this appalling behaviour,” he said.
The image was posted on the Facebook page of Suburban Ultras Australia, which said the photo was taken prior to the club’s game against Geelong Soccer Club at Stead Park on Saturday night.
Geelong councillors Anthony Aitken, Eddy Kontelj and mayor Stretch Kontelj, as well as Lara MP Ella George, were all in attendance.
Mr Aitken, who left at half time, said the game was mostly conducted in good spirit.
“Flares were set off, and the risk of that type of behaviour is that people can get injured, so it is unacceptable,” he said.
“Apart from that, I had no reason to feel unsafe, I was actually enjoying the match, the rivalry is very amicable.”
Mr Aitken said of the salutes prior to the match: “It’s certainly not behaviour the council or the two clubs accept, all of us jointly condemn it.”
Stretch Kontelj said there was “no place” for the gesture, describing it as “very ignorant, stupid actions”.
“I don’t believe there is any place for that at all, in any city, not only Geelong,” he said.
Ms George said “there is no place for behaviour like this at sporting events or anywhere in our community”.
Anti-Defamation Commission chair Dvir Abramovich welcomed the club’s swift rejection of “this filth”.
“There is no place for this kind of anti-Semitism, hatred and violence we’ve seen recently,” he said.
A Victoria Police spokesman said authorities were aware of the image.
“No official complaints have been received in relation to the matter and as such we are uncertain when and where the incident has occurred,” he said.
The Victorian government introduced laws in 2023 that made it an offence to perform the Nazi salute, with the maximum penalty 12 months imprisonment and a $23,000 fine.
Anyone with information on the matter is urged to contact Crime Stoppers on 1800 333 000 or submit a confidential report online at www.crimestoppersvic.com.au
https://www.geelongadvertiser.com.au/news/geelong/north-geelong-warriors-football-club-distances-itself-from-alleged-nazi-salute/news-story/e8ede13f9ce2a1d0337f5a1e90047ec5
https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=1162931652415108
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50760
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22724198 (080826ZMAR25) Notable: Oscar Cosic and Luka Jurkovic among those charged with Nazi salute - At least two soccer players from the Geelong region are among seven men who will front court later this year after being charged with performing a Nazi gesture. Oscar Cosic, who recently re-signed with the North Geelong Warriors, is among six names that appear on the Geelong Magistrates’ Court list for May 6. It’s understood Mr Cosic has been stood down by the club, with all mention of him on its online channels deleted. The club was contacted for comment, but has remained tight lipped as to whether the removal of his name from club media is in relation to the police investigation. Also among the names listed was Luka Jurkovic, who played for the Surf Coast Football Club in 2024. Surf Coast posted on its Facebook page in February that Mr Jurkovic had re-signed, however, the club said he had not officially registered and was therefore not an official member. The club reaffirmed this point in an online post Monday morning. “Surf Coast Football Club is aware of an article mentioning individuals who previously played for our club and are now involved in a police investigation,” it said. “These individuals are not members of our club in 2025 and have no current affiliation with us.”
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50759
Oscar Cosic and Luka Jurkovic among those charged with Nazi salute
At least two Geelong region soccer players will face court over an alleged Nazi salute.
Will Keech and Chelsea Bunting - March 3, 2025
At least two soccer players from the Geelong region are among seven men who will front court later this year after being charged with performing a Nazi gesture.
Oscar Cosic, who recently re-signed with the North Geelong Warriors, is among six names that appear on the Geelong Magistrates’ Court list for May 6.
It’s understood Mr Cosic has been stood down by the club, with all mention of him on its online channels deleted.
The club was contacted for comment, but has remained tight lipped as to whether the removal of his name from club media is in relation to the police investigation.
Also among the names listed was Luka Jurkovic, who played for the Surf Coast Football Club in 2024.
Surf Coast posted on its Facebook page in February that Mr Jurkovic had re-signed, however, the club said he had not officially registered and was therefore not an official member.
The club reaffirmed this point in an online post Monday morning.
“Surf Coast Football Club is aware of an article mentioning individuals who previously played for our club and are now involved in a police investigation,” it said.
“These individuals are not members of our club in 2025 and have no current affiliation with us.”
Mr Jurkovic is also a former North Geelong Warriors player.
Another name on the list is Liam Saric, who appeared in another image of the group at the same venue at a different time and has links to the Warriors.
In that image, which was shared on a social media account bearing Mr Saric’s name with Nazi skull images known as Totenkopfs covering people’s faces, was at least one other North Geelong senior player sitting next to Mr Saric.
The unobscured image has been seen by the Geelong Advertiser.
Nicholas Volarevic, Luka Volarevic and Christopher Jurkovic are also named on the court list.
On Tuesday, police confirmed seven men had been charged with displaying Nazi gestures at the Croatian Club in Bell Park earlier this month.
The charge carries a maximum penalty of 12 months’ jail and a fine of almost $24,000.
Anti-Defamation Commission chairman Dvir Abramovich welcomed the charges.
“The days of getting away with this poison are over,” Dr Abramovich said.
“This isn’t just a charge, it’s a reckoning.
“These men raised their arms to hate, and now they will be dragged before the courts to answer for it.
“Every salute they threw up was a slap in the face to Holocaust survivors – well, now the law is slapping back.”
A police spokesman said the charges came after an “extensive investigation into an image circulating online which depicted a group of men performing the prohibited gesture”.
“There is absolutely no place in our society for anti-Semitic, racist or hate-based behaviour and such activity will not be tolerated,” he said.
Football Victoria was contacted for comment.
https://www.geelongadvertiser.com.au/news/geelong/oscar-cosic-and-luka-jurkovic-among-those-charged-with-nazi-salute/news-story/59ae4eb1a0c313bca45e7eb96aa64f9c
https://www.instagram.com/surfcoastfc/p/DFgtP30TLZG/?img_index=4
https://www.instagram.com/surfcoastfc/p/DGtlb9dzPCW/
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50761
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22724258 (080843ZMAR25) Notable: Seven men charged with performing Nazi salute in Geelong - Seven men have been charged after they allegedly performed a Nazi salute inside a venue in regional Victoria on their way to a football match. An image that quickly began circulating online shows a group of fans of the North Geelong Warriors Football Club allegedly performing a Nazi salute on February 8 at the Croatian Club in Geelong. The photograph shows men dressed in mostly black clothing with their faces covered using hidden stickers featuring the Croatian flag. “North Geelong Warriors fans pre-game away to Geelong on Saturday night,” the online post read. Police retrieved CCTV footage from the venue as part of their “extensive” inquiries. Seven men have been charged on summons for public display or performance of Nazi symbols or gestures. The Victorian government made the act of displaying or performing symbols and gestures used by the Nazi Party - including the Nazi salute – illegal in October 2023. “Victoria Police stresses there is absolutely no place in our society for anti-Semitic, racist or hate-based behaviour and such activity will not be tolerated,” a police statement read.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50759
>>50760
Seven men charged with performing Nazi salute in Geelong
ALEXANDRA FEIAM - February 27, 2025
Seven men have been charged after they allegedly performed a Nazi salute inside a venue in regional Victoria on their way to a football match.
An image that quickly began circulating online shows a group of fans of the North Geelong Warriors Football Club allegedly performing a Nazi salute on February 8 at the Croatian Club in Geelong.
The photograph shows men dressed in mostly black clothing with their faces covered using hidden stickers featuring the Croatian flag.
“North Geelong Warriors fans pre-game away to Geelong on Saturday night,” the online post read.
Police retrieved CCTV footage from the venue as part of their “extensive” inquiries.
Seven men have been charged on summons for public display or performance of Nazi symbols or gestures.
Those charged are two 20-year-old men from Newtown, a 25-year-old man from Williams Landing, a 19-year-old man from East Geelong, a 22-year-old man from Lara, a 22-year-old man from North Geelong and a 23-year-old man from Geelong.
The Victorian government made the act of displaying or performing symbols and gestures used by the Nazi Party – including the Nazi salute – illegal in October 2023.
“Victoria Police stresses there is absolutely no place in our society for anti-Semitic, racist or hate-based behaviour and such activity will not be tolerated,” a police statement read.
The maximum penalty for the offence is a fine of $23,710, 12 months’ jail or both.
All seven men are due to appear at Geelong Magistrates’ Court on May 6.
A North Geelong Warriors spokesperson condemned the image when it first began circulating, issuing a statement on the club’s official social media page.
“North Geelong Warriors FC strongly condemns any behaviour that is disruptive, offensive, antagonistic or goes against the spirit of the game,” the statement read.
“The club has no direct affiliation with individuals or groups who engage in such conduct, and we do not support any narratives that promote behaviour contrary to our values.
“We are working closely with Football Victoria to address this matter and will take decisive action against anyone who brings NGWFC and the game of football into disrepute.
“To be clear – this type of behaviour is not welcome at Elcho Park or any other football venue.”
A Croatian Club spokesperson said they were “absolutely disgusted in this behaviour”.
“We are … extremely disappointed that an incident like this has occurred on our establishment,” they told NewsWire.
“Had we been aware of this incident at the time, all individuals would have been removed from the premises.”
https://www.theaustralian.com.au/breaking-news/seven-men-charged-with-performing-nazi-salute-in-geelong/news-story/b0ff3648aaf502aad6ac34a30dbf172f
https://www.facebook.com/ngwfc/posts/1021047986511985
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50762
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22729760 (091238ZMAR25) Notable: Labor’s emphatic WA win sets up Anthony Albanese to hold onto key federal seats in May election - West Australian Labor has won a state election victory that could set the party up for another two terms and Anthony Albanese has been given hope in his difficult task to hold on to key seats at the May federal poll, after Premier Roger Cook won a historic third landslide. Mr Cook’s iron-clad grip over all corners of Perth saw him sitting on a two party preferred vote of more than 58 per cent on Saturday night and win at least 40 seats, in what was set to be one of the ALP’s biggest election wins in its history nationwide and only overshadowed by his predecessor Mark McGowan’s record-breaking landslide in 2021. As he counted Mr McGowan among his thanks in his victory speech, Mr Cook said his government would be focused on housing, health and dealing with the cost-of-living crisis. “West Australians have voted for a future that is made in WA,” Mr Cook told his supporters in Kwinana. The WA Liberals fell flat in many of the former stronghold seats that they were expected to regain, with the party set to fail to win seats such as South Perth, Scarborough, Riverton and Bateman, all of which had been touted as all but certain to be reclaimed. While Labor had been expected to win easily, the Liberals had been wanting to reclaim a series of heartland seats to rebuild its parliamentary presence, to give it a real shot at winning government in 2029 and build up resources for the federal campaign starting next month. But Labor’s primary vote statewide dropped 18 per cent on Saturday’s counting from the last state election, with a particularly strong swing against it in WA’s regions where anger over a botched attempt at revamping cultural heritage laws and the Albanese government’s live sheep export ban saw support for the ALP recede.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>>/qresearch/22521553 (pb)
>>50742
Labor’s emphatic WA win sets up Anthony Albanese to hold onto key federal seats in May election
PAUL GARVEY - March 08, 2025
1/2
West Australian Labor has won a state election victory that could set the party up for another two terms and Anthony Albanese has been given hope in his difficult task to hold on to key seats at the May federal poll, after Premier Roger Cook won a historic third landslide.
Mr Cook’s iron-clad grip over all corners of Perth saw him sitting on a two party preferred vote of more than 58 per cent on Saturday night and win at least 40 seats, in what was set to be one of the ALP’s biggest election wins in its history nationwide and only overshadowed by his predecessor Mark McGowan’s record-breaking landslide in 2021.
As he counted Mr McGowan among his thanks in his victory speech, Mr Cook said his government would be focused on housing, health and dealing with the cost-of-living crisis.
“West Australians have voted for a future that is made in WA,” Mr Cook told his supporters in Kwinana.
“While we celebrate tonight, we are humble. We do not take that trust for granted. We will work to repay this trust every single day.”
The WA Liberals fell flat in many of the former stronghold seats that they were expected to regain, with the part set to fail to win seats such as South Perth, Scarborough, Riverton and Bateman, all of which had been touted as all but certain to be reclaimed.
While Labor had been expected to win easily, the Liberals had been wanting to reclaim a series of heartland seats to rebuild its parliamentary presence, to give it a real shot at winning government in 2029 and build up resources for the federal campaign starting next month.
But Labor’s primary vote statewide dropped 18 per cent on Saturday’s counting from the last state election, with a particularly strong swing against it in WA’s regions where anger over a botched attempt at revamping cultural heritage laws and the Albanese government’s live sheep export ban saw support for the ALP recede.
Fremantle MP and ALP frontbencher Simone McGurk was also on track to lose to independent candidate Kate Hulett, in one of the first national instances of a Teal-inspired community independent ousting a Labor MP.
The Prime Minister had been due to announce his own federal election date of April 12 on the back of the expected landslide in WA, but he switched to his contingency plan of a March 25 federal budget and a May election in the face of ex-tropical cyclone Alfred.
State results on Saturday showed Labor holding up in electorates that sit in the must-win federal seats of Tangney and Pearce.
The Liberals had only secured one extra seat on Saturday night’s count, with even star candidate Basil Zempilas leading in a too-close-to-call contest in the former blue-ribbon seat of Churchlands.
WA Liberal leader Libby Mettam is now vulnerable to a stalking leadership campaign from the Perth Lord Mayor should he get into parliament after all, given the disappointing result.
Ms Mettam said it would be up to her colleagues to decide if she continues in the role after she led the party to a third straight horror election result.
After giving her concession speech in Cottesloe on Saturday night, Ms Mettam said she would consider her future after speaking to her colleagues over the coming days.
“That will ultimately be a decision of the parliamentary Liberal Party, and I will respect whatever decision they make,” Ms Mettam said.
She acknowledged that the result had not gone the way she had expected.
“Quite clearly, this is not the result that we wanted,” she said.
“I feel I gave it my all, and there will be much reflection on what made the overall result and we will obviously take that into account.”
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50763
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22729807 (091247ZMAR25) Notable: Teal independent Kate Hulett poised to win safe WA Labor seat - The teal independent behind the likely shock defeat of a WA Labor minister in one of the party’s heartland seats says her win should be a warning to federal Environment Minister Tanya Plibersek. Fashion store owner Kate Hulett was on track to claim the seat of Fremantle from Cook government Water Minister Simone McGurk, in what was perhaps the biggest upset of the WA election. The seat has almost always been held by Labor and Ms McGurk enjoyed a margin of more than 15 per cent going into the weekend’s election. But she had been the target of a concerted and well-funded campaign that was highly critical of the Cook government’s environmental record, and in particular its perceived support for the state’s major miners and oil and gas producers. The Cook government late last year formally approved Woodside Energy’s extension of the North West Shelf gas project out to 2070, triggering fury among environmentalists, and successfully lobbied Anthony Albanese to kill off Ms Plibersek’s proposed nature positive laws. Ms Hulett had received significant financial support from Simon Holmes a Court’s Climate 200 as well as the broader community, leaving her with a six-figure war chest. Speaking on Sunday, Ms Hulett said her apparent victory should be a reminder to Ms Plibersek that voters expected the government to work for them, and not for gas companies.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50762
Teal independent Kate Hulett poised to win safe WA Labor seat
PAUL GARVEY - 9 March 2025
The teal independent behind the likely shock defeat of a WA Labor minister in one of the party’s heartland seats says her win should be a warning to federal Environment Minister Tanya Plibersek.
Fashion store owner Kate Hulett was on track to claim the seat of Fremantle from Cook government Water Minister Simone McGurk, in what was perhaps the biggest upset of the WA election.
The seat has almost always been held by Labor and Ms McGurk enjoyed a margin of more than 15 per cent going into the weekend’s election.
But she had been the target of a concerted and well-funded campaign that was highly critical of the Cook government’s environmental record, and in particular its perceived support for the state’s major miners and oil and gas producers.
The Cook government late last year formally approved Woodside Energy’s extension of the North West Shelf gas project out to 2070, triggering fury among environmentalists, and successfully lobbied Anthony Albanese to kill off Ms Plibersek’s proposed nature positive laws.
Ms Plibersek is due to decide later this month whether to approve the North West Shelf extension, although she has the ability to again delay her decision.
Ms Hulett had received significant financial support from Simon Holmes a Court’s Climate 200 as well as the broader community, leaving her with a six-figure war chest. Speaking on Sunday, Ms Hulett said her apparent victory should be a reminder to Ms Plibersek that voters expected the government to work for them, and not for gas companies.
“Tanya Plibersek and the government need to consider the citizens and the citizens of the future when making these decisions,” she said. “That the nature positive laws were overturned because of the West Australian government is an embarrassment, and I think a deep shame for us West Australians, because that doesn’t represent what we want.”
The shock loss of a safe Labor seat due to the Cook government’s environmental record will stoke concerns among other inner-city Labor MPs around the country.
Ms Hulett said she had no doubt that the Cook government’s decision to approve the North West Shelf had helped her campaign. She said the government’s decision to wave the project through was “a crazy thing to do”.
Her win could come despite the Liberals deciding to direct their preferences in the seat to Labor.
WA Premier Roger Cook said it would be very disappointing to lose Ms McGurk, who he described as a friend and an important member of his team.
He defended his government’s environmental record, noting it had been responsible for banning native logging and single-use plastics, and had committed to phasing out coal-fired power in the state.
But he said he stood by the government’s decisions around oil and gas. “We’ll stand up for WA jobs, we’ll stand up for the WA economy and we’ll keep the economy strong,” he said.
“Government is tough. You have to make tough decisions. You have to make decisions in the best interests of the entire state. That sometimes disappoints some people, but you need to make sure that you provide strong government, and that’s what the WA public endorsed yesterday, the strong government that we’ve provided to the people of this state.”
Greens resources spokeswoman Dorinda Cox had said the party would push Labor to block the North West Shelf in the event of a minority government. Federal teal independent Kate Chaney has repeatedly called for Ms Plibersek to block the project, but now says she is comfortable for it to go ahead if sufficient conditions are imposed. The federal government has repeatedly said the decision on the North West Shelf will be made only according to law.
https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/teal-independent-poised-to-snatch-safe-labor-seat-in-wa/news-story/a586a2ce9c8a3d867f99fcff3ac1fc8d
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50764
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22729868 (091256ZMAR25) Notable: COMMENTARY: Anthony Albanese will be wishing he called an April poll after all following this dream result in WA - "The Liberal Party’s disastrous showing in the Western Australian election is a nightmare result for Peter Dutton and a dream outcome for Anthony Albanese. The Prime Minister may be regretting his decision to postpone his calling of the election after Premier Roger Cook and Labor delivered an emphatic result across metropolitan Perth, with the Liberals failing to claw back ground in former stronghold seats. We thought the Liberals would never deliver a worse result than we saw in Western Australia in 2021. We may have been wrong. The Liberals should emerge with more seats than the two they held in the 2021 bloodbath, but this is arguably a much worse result for the party. Unlike 2021, there’s no Mark McGowan. There’s no Covid. The 2021 vote was almost a war-time election, with West Australians behind their closed border smitten with the government that they believed were keeping them safe. Most worrying for the Coalition, the state seats corresponding with the marginal Labor-held Federal electorate of Tangney - Bateman, Bicton and Riverton - all set to remain in Labor hands. Western Australia has shaped as a key battleground dederally since Labor’s gains in the state in 2022 helped Anthony Albanese secure a majority government. The Coalition realistically needs to win at least three more Federal seats to claim government No-one privately expected the Liberals to win. But there was an expectation that the Liberals would gain enough seats to become a viable opposition and maybe be in a position to challenge the Labor behemoth in 2029. That now looks like wishful thinking." - Paul Garvey - theaustralian.com.au
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50708
>>50755
>>50762
COMMENTARY: Anthony Albanese will be wishing he called an April poll after all following this dream result in WA
PAUL GARVEY - 8 March 2025
The Liberal Party’s disastrous showing in the Western Australian election is a nightmare result for Peter Dutton and a dream outcome for Anthony Albanese.
The Prime Minister may be regretting his decision to postpone his calling of the election after Premier Roger Cook and Labor delivered an emphatic result across metropolitan Perth, with the Liberals failing to claw back ground in former stronghold seats.
We thought the Liberals would never deliver a worse result than we saw in Western Australia in 2021. We may have been wrong.
The Liberals should emerge with more seats than the two they held in the 2021 bloodbath, but this is arguably a much worse result for the party.
Unlike 2021, there’s no Mark McGowan. There’s no Covid. The 2021 vote was almost a war-time election, with West Australians behind their closed border smitten with the government that they believed were keeping them safe.
This time, the Liberals were up against a Labor government seeking a third term, which was running a groaning health system, in the middle of a cost of living crisis, and with a deeply unpopular Labor government in Canberra. The Liberals didn’t repeat the mistake of Zak Kirkup four years ago when he conceded the election weeks ahead of the vote.
Yet one after another, the former Crown Jewel seats that were expected to turn blue again have stayed red.
Most worrying for the Coalition, the state seats corresponding with the marginal Labor-held Federal electorate of Tangney - Bateman, Bicton and Riverton - all set to remain in Labor hands.
Those results will encourage Labor MP for Tangney Sam Lim that he can defend that marginal seat.
The next-most marginal Labor-held seat in WA, Pearce, has similarly enjoyed a strong result for Labor. The state seats within Pearce, namely Butler, Wanneroo, Mindarie and Joondalup, have all been comfortably retained by the Cook government.
There are also mixed signals out of the seats within the new Federal electorate of Bullwinkel, which is also considered a must-win for the Coalition. Labor enjoys a strong lead in Swan Hills, Kalamunda is too close to call, and Central Wheatbelt has been comfortably retained by the Nationals.
There has been some better news for the coalition in Curtin, although the results in the blue-ribbon state seats within the electorate have not been as emphatic as many Liberals had expected.
Western Australia has shaped as a key battleground dederally since Labor’s gains in the state in 2022 helped Anthony Albanese secure a majority government.
The Coalition realistically needs to win at least three more Federal seats to claim government
On a state level, Churchlands, Nedlands, Bateman, Carine, South Perth, Kalamanda, Mount Lawley, Hillarys, Dawesville, Murray-Wellington, Jandakot and Scarborough had all been firmly Liberal seats before they were lost over the course of 2017 and 2021.
Only Carine has been confirmed as a Liberal gain so far. The Liberals won’t win Bateman, South Perth, Mount Lawley, Hillarys, Dawesville, Jandakot or Scarborough.
No-one privately expected the Liberals to win. But there was an expectation that the Liberals would gain enough seats to become a viable opposition and maybe be in a position to challenge the Labor behemoth in 2029.
That now looks like wishful thinking.
https://www.theaustralian.com.au/commentary/anthony-albanese-will-be-wishing-he-called-an-april-poll-after-all-following-this-dream-result-in-wa/news-story/79dd6480c061ae81f04ab46f825443c1
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50765
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22729914 (091310ZMAR25) Notable: UK says Australia ‘considering’ joining group to protect Ukraine peace - Australia’s Prime Minister Anthony Albanese is considering joining a group of countries prepared to protect an eventual ceasefire in the Russia-Ukraine war, according to the UK’s prime minister. Britain and France have been leading efforts to form the so-called “coalition of the willing”, with the US’ long-term commitment to Europe’s security now in doubt under President Donald Trump. British Prime Minister Keir Starmer “spoke to the Prime Minister of Australia Anthony Albanese this morning,” the UK leader’s office said on Saturday. “He welcomed Prime Minister Albanese’s commitment to consider contributing to a Coalition of the Willing for Ukraine and looked forward to the Chiefs of Defence meeting in Paris on Tuesday.” European countries have been rushing to boost support for Ukraine as Mr Trump pursues direct talks with Russian leader Vladimir Putin to end Moscow’s three-year-long invasion of Ukraine. Key details about the “coalition of the willing” have not been specified, but the grouping was mentioned by Mr Starmer during a summit of European leaders in London last Sunday aimed at guaranteeing “lasting peace” in Ukraine. Earlier this week, Mr Albanese told journalists that Australia was “ready to assist” Ukraine. “There’s discussion at the moment about potential peacekeeping,” he said. “From my government’s perspective, we’re open to consideration of any proposals going forward.”
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50731
>>50740
>>50748
UK says Australia ‘considering’ joining group to protect Ukraine peace
Britain’s PM has revealed what Anthony Albanese told him on a Saturday phone call about his plan for Australia’s potential involvement in protecting Ukraine from Russia.
AFP / news.com.au - March 9, 2025
Australia’s Prime Minister Anthony Albanese is considering joining a group of countries prepared to protect an eventual ceasefire in the Russia-Ukraine war, according to the UK’s prime minister.
Britain and France have been leading efforts to form the so-called “coalition of the willing”, with the US’ long-term commitment to Europe’s security now in doubt under President Donald Trump.
British Prime Minister Keir Starmer “spoke to the Prime Minister of Australia Anthony Albanese this morning,” the UK leader’s office said on Saturday.
“He welcomed Prime Minister Albanese’s commitment to consider contributing to a Coalition of the Willing for Ukraine and looked forward to the Chiefs of Defence meeting in Paris on Tuesday.”
European countries have been rushing to boost support for Ukraine as Mr Trump pursues direct talks with Russian leader Vladimir Putin to end Moscow’s three-year-long invasion of Ukraine.
Several European states have said they would be willing to deploy troops to Ukraine as a “security guarantee”.
Key details about the “coalition of the willing” have not been specified, but the grouping was mentioned by Mr Starmer during a summit of European leaders in London last Sunday aimed at guaranteeing “lasting peace” in Ukraine.
British officials have held talks with around 20 countries interested in being part of the group, a UK official said on Thursday.
The official refused to name the nations but said they were “largely European and Commonwealth partners”.
Earlier this week, Mr Albanese told journalists that Australia was “ready to assist” Ukraine.
“There’s discussion at the moment about potential peacekeeping,” he said. “From my government’s perspective, we’re open to consideration of any proposals going forward.”
https://www.news.com.au/world/middle-east/uk-says-australia-considering-joining-group-to-protect-ukraine-peace/news-story/7f1ed13c52e0192ff0f793d5c37f8c6e
https://www.gov.uk/government/news/pm-call-with-prime-minister-albanese-of-australia-8-march-2025
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50766
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22730031 (091336ZMAR25) Notable: NT Police Commissioner Michael Murphy to be sacked after 'incompetent' ICAC finding - Northern Territory Police Commissioner Michael Murphy has been stood down after an NT ICAC probe found he engaged in "incompetent" conduct by recruiting a close friend to a high-ranking police position. NT Chief Minister Lia Finocchiaro announced late on Saturday that Commissioner Murphy's position was "untenable". "Today, I informed Commissioner Murphy he has lost the confidence of the government," she said. "I gave Commissioner Murphy the opportunity to resign. The police commissioner was asked to go on leave effective immediately. I have now begun the process to terminate the appointment of the police commissioner." Ms Finocchiaro's announcement came just over a week since she was first made aware of the findings against Commissioner Murphy, with his name initially kept anonymous by the ICAC. The ICAC report revealed that the unnamed senior executive, later revealed as Commissioner Murphy, had in early 2024 helped his good friend get a high-placed job in the public service, and sat on the panel that hired him. On Thursday, Commissioner Murphy publicly revealed himself to be the subject of that anti-corruption probe. Following his revelation, the entire executive board of the NT Police Association called for Commissioner Murphy to tender his resignation over the integrity breach. Commissioner Murphy's departure marks the second NT police commissioner to leave the force suddenly within two years, after Jamie Chalker was forced to retire during a period of escalating crime concerns in 2023.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50758
NT Police Commissioner Michael Murphy to be sacked after 'incompetent' ICAC finding
Matt Garrick - 8 March 2025
Northern Territory Police Commissioner Michael Murphy has been stood down after an NT ICAC probe found he engaged in "incompetent" conduct by recruiting a close friend to a high-ranking police position.
NT Chief Minister Lia Finocchiaro announced late on Saturday that Commissioner Murphy's position was "untenable".
"Today, I informed Commissioner Murphy he has lost the confidence of the government," she said.
"I gave Commissioner Murphy the opportunity to resign.
"The police commissioner was asked to go on leave effective immediately.
"I have now begun the process to terminate the appointment of the police commissioner."
Ms Finocchiaro's announcement came just over a week since she was first made aware of the findings against Commissioner Murphy, with his name initially kept anonymous by the ICAC.
The ICAC report revealed that the unnamed senior executive, later revealed as Commissioner Murphy, had in early 2024 helped his good friend get a high-placed job in the public service, and sat on the panel that hired him.
On Thursday, Commissioner Murphy publicly revealed himself to be the subject of that anti-corruption probe.
Following his revelation, the entire executive board of the NT Police Association called for Commissioner Murphy to tender his resignation over the integrity breach.
Commissioner Murphy's departure marks the second NT police commissioner to leave the force suddenly within two years, after Jamie Chalker was forced to retire during a period of escalating crime concerns in 2023.
Ms Finocchiaro said Commissioner Murphy will receive six months' pay once his employment is terminated.
"This process requires natural justice to Michael Murphy, and involves cabinet, executive council and advice to the Administrator on termination," she said in her statement.
"The terms and conditions of his appointment in 2023 requires payment of six months remuneration upon termination."
Current Deputy Commissioner Martin Dole will stand in as acting commissioner for now.
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-03-09/nt-police-commissioner-michael-murphy-to-be-sacked/105028270
https://www.facebook.com/LiaFinocchiaroMLA/posts/1072518891365208
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50767
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22730053 (091345ZMAR25) Notable: Hunt for new NT top cop after Michael Murphy axed - The NT government is being urged to look outside the Territory to replace ousted police commissioner Michael Murphy, who was dramatically axed just two days after admitting he was the unnamed officer in a jobs-for-mates scandal. On Saturday night, Chief Minister Lia Finocchiaro issued a statement saying Mr Murphy’s position was “untenable” following revelations he chaired a panel that appointed a close friend to a senior position in the force, resulting in a finding by the Independent Commissioner Against Corruption of improper conduct. Ms Finocchiaro said she had informed the commissioner he had lost the confidence of the government, but it appears Mr Murphy’s termination is not effective immediately. “I gave Commissioner Murphy the opportunity to resign,” Ms Finocchiaro said, noting that he had been “asked to go on leave”, effective immediately. Deputy Commissioner Martin Dole, a 28-year veteran of the force, has been appointed Acting Police Commissioner but is considered unlikely to score the permanent role. Current and former senior NT police told The Australian that most of the other potential candidates from within the force were tainted, even if only by association with previous scandals or involvement in racist conduct. “The job description should read: only those outside the Territory need apply,” one former senior officer told The Australian. “There are just too many skeletons in the cupboard. They need a senior officer with a record of integrity and strong leadership - even someone retired – to take on the job for the next 12 months while they find the right person for the next 10 years.”
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50758
>>50766
Hunt for new NT top cop after Michael Murphy axed
STEPHEN RICE - 9 March 2025
The NT government is being urged to look outside the Territory to replace ousted police commissioner Michael Murphy, who was dramatically axed just two days after admitting he was the unnamed officer in a jobs-for-mates scandal.
On Saturday night, Chief Minister Lia Finocchiaro issued a statement saying Mr Murphy’s position was “untenable” following revelations he chaired a panel that appointed a close friend to a senior position in the force, resulting in a finding by the Independent Commissioner Against Corruption of improper conduct.
Ms Finocchiaro said she had informed the commissioner he had lost the confidence of the government, but it appears Mr Murphy’s termination is not effective immediately.
“I gave Commissioner Murphy the opportunity to resign,” Ms Finocchiaro said, noting that he had been “asked to go on leave”, effective immediately.
Deputy Commissioner Martin Dole, a 28-year veteran of the force, has been appointed Acting Police Commissioner but is considered unlikely to score the permanent role.
Current and former senior NT police told The Australian that most of the other potential candidates from within the force were tainted, even if only by association with previous scandals or involvement in racist conduct.
“The job description should read: only those outside the Territory need apply,” one former senior officer told The Australian.
“There are just too many skeletons in the cupboard. They need a senior officer with a record of integrity and strong leadership – even someone retired – to take on the job for the next 12 months while they find the right person for the next 10 years.”
The recruitment search should extend overseas, if necessary, to countries such as New Zealand, the former officer said.
“That person has to be able to do something about the ever-increasing crime levels here, but doing things that are community based, managing really vulnerable groups in a way Murphy was never able to do.”
Mr Murphy’s tenure as the Territory’s top cop had been marred by controversy, with bitter division between the force’s top brass and rank-and-file members culminating last year in his resignation from the NT Police Association days after apologising to Aboriginal people of the Territory for decades of systemic racism within the force.
ICAC revealed in February that an investigation into an unnamed senior officer had uncovered “improper conduct” in the management of his conflicts of interest, calling it “negligent” and “incompetent”.
ICAC delegate Patricia Kelly SC found that the officer had declared the prior relationship but ought to have recused himself after giving the candidate a copy of a prior job application and acting as a referee for him. On Thursday Mr Murphy outed himself as the unnamed officer but did not apologise and refused to resign over the scandal.
“I accept that I should have dealt better with a conflict of interest, a friendship and a referee report in relation to an appointee,” Mr Murphy said in a statement.
“On reflection, I should have managed the friendship and the conflict of interest to a higher standard and on at least one occasion should have recused myself from the appointment process in order to ensure community confidence.”
Last week Ms Finocchiaro described Mr Murphy’s conduct simply as “unsatisfactory” and “disappointing” but did not call for his resignation.
On Saturday night she said the process of terminating Mr Murphy’s appointment required natural justice to him and involved cabinet, executive council and advice to the administrator on termination.
“I make no apologies for working through this methodically in the interests of Territorians,” she said.
The terms and conditions of his appointment in 2023 required payment of six months’ remuneration upon termination, she said.
The NT Police Association had demanded Mr Murphy’s resignation and questioned his integrity, saying the trust of its members in the commissioner was “destroyed”.
“This has triggered deep anger and frustration amongst our members and brings into disrepute the whole police force,” NTPA president Nathan Finn said.
“Our members will not forget this betrayal and question his ability to continue as the commissioner of police.”
https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/nt-top-cop-michael-murphy-axed-after-jobformate-scandal/news-story/c32d12b746e21ed3e72bdcab6a4df678
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50768
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22734109 (100804ZMAR25) Notable: Roger Cook vows to help Anthony Albanese after latest WA landslide - West Australian Premier Roger Cook will use his massive election victory, his booming personal popularity and the increasingly strong resources of WA Labor to help Anthony Albanese sandbag crucial federal seats in the state. As bruised Liberal strategists try to digest what their latest disastrous campaign would mean for the push to reclaim former Coalition seats at the federal election, Mr Cook declared he would swing behind the Prime Minister’s bid to return to power. Speaking on Sunday morning after leading his party to the second-biggest win in state history, and Labor’s third consecutive landslide in the west, Mr Cook said he expected Mr Albanese to make a pitch to voters similar to the one that helped his government secure an overwhelming majority. “I think Anthony Albanese has the similar vision for the country as we have for the state,” the re-elected Premier said. “That is to make sure that manufacturing and great jobs based upon a strong manufacturing sector is part of what we want to achieve for the state. It’s part of what he wants to achieve for the country.” The Liberals so far have secured only seven of 59 seats in WA’s lower house, falling well short of their internal target of returning to the 13 seats they had before Mark McGowan’s history-making 2021 triumph. The dismal result looks all but certain to cost Libby Mettam her leadership, although the party will have only a handful of MPs with no prior parliamentary experience from which to choose her replacement. Peter Dutton on Sunday acknowledged the “mixed” results in the state and tried to drive a wedge between Mr Cook and Mr Albanese, highlighting the Premier’s opposition to several Albanese government positions.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50762
Roger Cook vows to help Anthony Albanese after latest WA landslide
PAUL GARVEY - 9 March 2025
1/2
West Australian Premier Roger Cook will use his massive election victory, his booming personal popularity and the increasingly strong resources of WA Labor to help Anthony Albanese sandbag crucial federal seats in the state.
As bruised Liberal strategists try to digest what their latest disastrous campaign would mean for the push to reclaim former Coalition seats at the federal election, Mr Cook declared he would swing behind the Prime Minister’s bid to return to power.
Speaking on Sunday morning after leading his party to the second-biggest win in state history, and Labor’s third consecutive landslide in the west, Mr Cook said he expected Mr Albanese to make a pitch to voters similar to the one that helped his government secure an overwhelming majority.
“I think Anthony Albanese has the similar vision for the country as we have for the state,” the re-elected Premier said.
“That is to make sure that manufacturing and great jobs based upon a strong manufacturing sector is part of what we want to achieve for the state. It’s part of what he wants to achieve for the country.”
The Liberals so far have secured only seven of 59 seats in WA’s lower house, falling well short of their internal target of returning to the 13 seats they had before Mark McGowan’s history-making 2021 triumph. The dismal result looks all but certain to cost Libby Mettam her leadership, although the party will have only a handful of MPs with no prior parliamentary experience from which to choose her replacement.
Mr Cook has had a tense relationship with federal Labor at times, campaigning against Tanya Plibersek’s Nature Positive laws, criticising the live sheep export ban and blaming Canberra for the pressures in WA’s health system.
Peter Dutton on Sunday acknowledged the “mixed” results in the state and tried to drive a wedge between Mr Cook and Mr Albanese, highlighting the Premier’s opposition to several Albanese government positions.
“Roger Cook has made a number of decisions that were in WA’s best interest whereas Anthony Albanese and Tanya Plibersek make decisions that will hurt WA, and that’s why Roger Cook has spoken out against some of the decisions around Nature Positive, which is an anti-mining bill,” Mr Dutton said.
But Mr Cook said he would be closely involved in Mr Albanese’s campaigning in the battleground state.
Federal Labor successfully leveraged off the popularity of Mr McGowan in 2022, featuring the then premier in almost all of its election materials and advertising on its way to its best-ever result in the west.
Holding on to those gains in WA is central to Mr Albanese’s hopes of retaining majority government.
“Prime Minister Albanese has provided great leadership for this country, they’ve stabilised the economy, they’ve continued to create jobs, and they’ve got a vision for the country similar to ours with regards to manufacturing,” Mr Cook said.
“I’m very much looking forward to working on the hustings, doing my bit to see the re-election of an Albanese Labor government.”
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50769
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22734115 (100811ZMAR25) Notable: Video: Fake terror, real fear, and hunt for puppetmaster behind anti-Semitic attacks - All 14 of the alleged offenders arrested over a streak of anti-Semitic crimes have now been charged after it was revealed an organised crime kingpin directed a cabal of Australia-based criminals to orchestrate a raft of attacks now labelled a “fabricated terror plot”. On Monday, the 14 alleged offenders were arrested after eleven simultaneous police raids, with five people charged from the outset. By Tuesday morning, all had been charged with a total of 65 alleged offences, though the supposed kingpin behind the scheme is believed to have evaded arrest so far. The alleged mastermind “pulled the strings” on a spate of Sydney’s anti-Semitic attacks from “afar”, understood to be while based on foreign soil, and had sought to leverage information about an abandoned explosives-laden caravan with police to secure leniency in a separate criminal case. The charges came after dawn raids by NSW Police and Australian Federal Police, who arrested 14 people in relation to a string of the anti-Semitic vandalism and firebombing attacks - bringing the total number of people arrested under state police’s hate-crimes unit to 29 with a total of 143 charges laid. NSW Premier Chris Minns had first labelled the caravan as a potential “mass-casualty event” and “terrorism”. Police have now called it a “criminal con job” and “fabricated terror plot” in a foiled attempt for criminals to use as a bartering tool to reduce their sentences or drop charges. It follows a summer of rising anti-Semitism in NSW, but with police now alleging that the most severe cases had their roots in the sophisticated criminal plot.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>>/qresearch/22481988 (pb)
>>>/qresearch/22490495 (pb)
>>50707
Police say Sydney caravan discovery 'part of a fabricated terrorism plot'
Daniel Jeffrey - Mar 10, 2025
Federal police have revealed the caravan filled with explosives found on the side of the road in north-western Sydney was a "fake terrorism plot" that aimed to cause fear in the Jewish community, but there was no risk of a mass casualty event.
Police launched several raids this morning in relation to recent antisemitic attacks and arrested 14 people who were charged with 49 offences.
While giving an update on the arrests, Australian Federal Police revealed that the caravan that was found full of explosives in Dural in January was an attempt driven by organised criminals to threaten the Jewish community rather than stage a terror attack.
"Almost immediately (after the caravan was found), experienced investigators within the joint counter-terrorism team believed that the caravan was part of a fabricated terrorist plot, essentially a criminal con job," AFP Deputy Commissioner Krissy Barrett said.
"This was because of the information they already had, how easily the caravan was found and how visible the explosives were in the caravan. Also, there was no detonator.
"Today, I can reveal the caravan was never going to cause a mass casualty event but instead was concocted by criminals who wanted to cause fear for personal benefit."
Barrett said while the plot was not aimed at causing casualties, it was still a sinister crime.
"Regardless of the motivation of those responsible for this fake plot, this has had a chilling effect on the Jewish community," she said.
"This twisted, self-serving criminality has terrorised Jewish Australians.
"What organised crime has done to the Jewish community is reprehensible, and it won't go without consequence.
"There was also unwarranted suspicion directed at other communities – and that is also reprehensible.
"This is a rare time I will provide advice to criminals – serve your time quietly in prison and stop diverting the resources of terrorism investigators – otherwise your charges could be significantly upgraded."
NSW Police Deputy Commissioner David Hudson said all of the arrests made this morning were linked to other antisemitic crimes across Sydney rather than the caravan plot, but that there are significant links between the two.
"The caravan job, as I indicated, was orchestrated by the same individual or individuals that were orchestrating the (other) incidents," he said.
While no one has been arrested or charged in direct relation to the Dural caravan, police said they believe they know who was behind the plot.
"This person who we allege is pulling the strings is known to organised crime, known in the organised crime environment... we have a number of ongoing targets, some are based in Australia, some based offshore," Barrett said.
She added there was no evidence to suggest state actors were involved.
Hudson said no one arrested had displayed "any form of antisemitic ideology".
"However, the threat to the community through the use of arson and the presence of explosives was very real," he said.
"I understand the anxiety these incidents have had on the Jewish community who we have been in constant contact with.
"We don't believe there is any ongoing threat to the community from a terrorist act."
https://www.9news.com.au/national/nsw-police-afp-arrests-made-antisemitic-attacks-sydney/87624caf-b47f-4a23-82fe-ffee95f2cc35
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fusX73rL1pU
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50770
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22734118 (100816ZMAR25) Notable: Don Farrell won’t travel to Washington for talks on Donald Trump’s trade war despite tariff uncertainty - Trade Minister Don Farrell has ruled out an eleventh-hour trip to Washington DC after Kevin Rudd failed to secure an Australian carve-out from Donald Trump’s 25 per cent steel and aluminium tariffs with just days to go until the duties are slapped on exporters to the US. Senator Farrell said Dr Rudd had been unable to achieve a breakthrough in a Saturday morning meeting with US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, though it remained unclear whether Australian companies would be hit when the details of the tariffs plan were unveiled on Thursday AEDT. “They’re continuing to engage in discussions. Hopefully we get a satisfactory outcome,” he said. Senator Farrell said while Australian officials would continue to press the nation’s case, he was not planning a last-ditch trip to the US to try and sway the outcome. “I certainly won’t be going in the next three days,” Senator Farrell told The Australian. “I’m watching intently what’s going to happen over the next three days and then we’ll make some decisions.” Anthony Albanese has also indicated he will not travel to the US ahead of the election to try and seek an exemption from the tariffs, saying his focus ahead of the March 25 budget would be the aftermath of Cyclone Alfred.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50725
>>50756
Don Farrell won’t travel to Washington for talks on Donald Trump’s trade war despite tariff uncertainty
BEN PACKHAM - 10 March 2025
Trade Minister Don Farrell has ruled out an eleventh-hour trip to Washington DC after Kevin Rudd failed to secure an Australian carve-out from Donald Trump’s 25 per cent steel and aluminium tariffs with just days to go until the duties are slapped on exporters to the US.
Senator Farrell said Dr Rudd had been unable to achieve a breakthrough in a Saturday morning meeting with US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, though it remained unclear whether Australian companies would be hit when the details of the tariffs plan were unveiled on Thursday AEDT.
“They’re continuing to engage in discussions. Hopefully we get a satisfactory outcome,” he said.
Senator Farrell said while Australian officials would continue to press the nation’s case, he was not planning a last-ditch trip to the US to try and sway the outcome.
“I certainly won’t be going in the next three days,” Senator Farrell told The Australian.
“I’m watching intently what’s going to happen over the next three days and then we’ll make some decisions.”
Anthony Albanese has also indicated he will not travel to the US ahead of the election to try and seek an exemption from the tariffs, saying his focus ahead of the March 25 budget would be the aftermath of Cyclone Alfred.
As the Coalition prepares to seize on any failure by the government to secure a tariff carve-out, Senator Farrell warned Labor was ready to hit back.
“They were the group that you know, left us with the $20 billion worth of trade impediments with China, the last of which we managed to remove just before Christmas,” he said.
“Remember this – from the time that Trump originally announced the tariffs on steel and aluminium the last time, it was nine months before we got a formal exemption,” he said.
“And it took us three years to get everything back into China.
“These are not easy discussions. Countries are making decisions based on what they think is in their national interest. What we’ve got to do is make decisions that are based on our national interests. And our national interest right now is ensuring those tariffs don’t get applied. That’s what we’re trying to do.”
Mr Trump said he would give “great consideration” to a potential exemption for Australia from his looming steel and aluminium tariffs.
But senior US officials including the President’s trade adviser Peter Navarro have accused Australia of dumping subsidised steel and aluminium on the US market.
Senator Farrell said no one could say for sure which way the tariff decision would go.
“Anybody who tells you they know what’s going on is pulling your leg,” he said.
“These are not ordinary times. They’re not ordinary negotiations. And all Australia can do is put our best foot forward, propose no tariffs, and keep pushing for that until we get the result we want.”
Senator Farrell had said he would travel to the US for talks with Mr Lutnick after his counterpart’s appointment was confirmed by the Senate, which happened about three weeks ago.
But the planned trip was sidelined by Senate estimates hearings in the last week of February, a US trip by Treasurer Jim Chalmers, and preparations for a now-deferred April election.
https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/farrell-to-stay-put-despite-tariff-uncertainty/news-story/d2f3c66bb02aabe8fbd406d869dac3c0
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50771
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22734120 (100825ZMAR25) Notable: Trump's Turnbull Truth:Trump slams Turnbull as ‘weak and ineffective’ before call on tariffs- US President Donald Trump has lashed former prime minister Malcolm Turnbull in a late-night social media post as he prepares to decide whether to exempt Australia from tariffs on steel and aluminium imports. Trump was scathing of Turnbull on Truth Social, a social media platform owned by the president, on Sunday evening (Monday AEDT). “Malcolm Turnbull, the former prime minister of Australia who was always leading that wonderful country from ‘behind’, never understood what was going on in China, nor did he have the capacity to do so,” Trump wrote. “I always thought he was a weak and ineffective leader and, obviously, Australian’s [sic] agreed with me.” Turnbull had just appeared on Bloomberg television in the US, speaking about the planned tariffs and arguing Trump was playing into China’s hands. In his Bloomberg appearance, Turnbull said he expected Chinese President Xi Jinping to take “massive advantage” of Trump’s presidency. “Where Trump is chaotic, he will be consistent. Where Trump is rude and abusive, he’ll be respectful,” Turnbull said. “And what that will do is build trust with countries, and there will be many countries looking at China on one hand, Trump on the other, [that] will prefer China.” Turnbull also said Trump “wasn’t really prepared” to govern in his first term because he didn’t expect to win the 2016 election but was much more determined now and was surrounded by loyalists who would implement his agenda. Asked to respond to Trump’s social media barb, Turnbull said: “I’m a quivering leaf.”
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50725
Trump slams Turnbull as ‘weak and ineffective’ before call on tariffs
Michael Koziol and Matthew Knott - March 10, 2025
Washington: US President Donald Trump has lashed former prime minister Malcolm Turnbull in a late-night social media post as he prepares to decide whether to exempt Australia from tariffs on steel and aluminium imports.
Trump was scathing of Turnbull on Truth Social, a social media platform owned by the president, on Sunday evening (Monday AEDT).
“Malcolm Turnbull, the former prime minister of Australia who was always leading that wonderful country from ‘behind’, never understood what was going on in China, nor did he have the capacity to do so,” Trump wrote.
“I always thought he was a weak and ineffective leader and, obviously, Australian’s [sic] agreed with me.”
Turnbull had just appeared on Bloomberg television in the US, speaking about the planned tariffs and arguing Trump was playing into China’s hands.
In his Bloomberg appearance, Turnbull said he expected Chinese President Xi Jinping to take “massive advantage” of Trump’s presidency.
“Where Trump is chaotic, he will be consistent. Where Trump is rude and abusive, he’ll be respectful,” Turnbull said.
“And what that will do is build trust with countries, and there will be many countries looking at China on one hand, Trump on the other, [that] will prefer China.”
Trump’s on-again, off-again tariff threats were “bad for business” and could drive the US into recession, Turnbull added.
“Trump seems to have a view that America can prosper at the expense of everyone else, but that’s not going to work,” he said.
Turnbull also said Trump “wasn’t really prepared” to govern in his first term because he didn’t expect to win the 2016 election but was much more determined now and was surrounded by loyalists who would implement his agenda.
Asked to respond to Trump’s social media barb, Turnbull said: “I’m a quivering leaf.”
Trump’s attack came just hours after Turnbull sent out invitations for an all-day conference he is organising at the National Press Club in Canberra on March 31 to rethink the future of the US-Australia alliance and the AUKUS pact in the age of Trump.
“With the arrival of Trump mark II, we have seen him effectively switch sides in the war in Ukraine and inflict extraordinary economic damage on allies like Canada, but both sides of politics are trying to pretend that nothing has happened,” Turnbull said.
“It’s bipartisan gaslighting. It’s long overdue for Australia to have a proper conversation about our place in the world and how we defend ourselves. It’s clear we cannot rely on the United States.”
Turnbull said he had invited about 100 “leading defence and foreign policy thinkers” to the on-the-record event, and that a broad spectrum of political opinions would be represented.
“It is more likely than not we will never get a Virginia-class submarine from the US, but where is the plan B?” Turnbull asked. “This is completely unacceptable.”
The invitation to participants says: “The breakneck speed at which the second Trump administration is challenging and overturning assumptions about the international order compels close allies to re-examine the fundamentals of their foreign and defence policies. This is happening in the capitals of Europe, in Ottawa and elsewhere, but not in Canberra ... I ask you to join me in this conversation with one goal in mind: the sovereignty and security of our continent.”
Earlier in the day, Trump flew to Washington from his Mar-a-Lago resort in Florida, and did not answer when asked whether he would exempt Australia from the tariffs.
He previously said he would give it great consideration, but in recent days Trump’s top economic adviser, Kevin Hassett, said he doubted any exemptions would be granted.
https://www.theage.com.au/world/north-america/trump-slams-turnbull-as-weak-and-ineffective-before-call-on-tariffs-20250310-p5life.html
https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/114135887529701366
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50772
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22734131 (100837ZMAR25) Notable: Video: Trump’s Chaos Is a Gift to Xi Jinping, Former Australian PM Says - The second Trump administration’s poor treatment of US allies and global institutions is providing “an opportunity” for China’s president, former Australian Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull said, adding that Canberra needed to try to adopt a more independent defense policy as Washington grows more unreliable. Turnbull, who led Australia from 2015 until 2018, said the world is seeing a more “undiluted” version of Donald Trump in his second term in office, and that his behavior would be viewed as an “advantage” for China’s President Xi Jinping in international relations over the next four years. “President Xi will aim to be the exact opposite of Trump,” Turnbull said in an interview with Bloomberg Television in Sydney on Monday. “Where Trump is chaotic, he will be consistent. Where Trump is rude and abusive, he’ll be respectful. Where Trump is erratic, he will be consistent.” Through that approach, Turnbull said there would be countries that look at “China on the one hand, and Trump on the other” and would “find China a more attractive partner.” Turnbull was prime minister of Australia for part of Trump’s first term in office, and had a sometimes fractious relationship with the US president at the time. Posting to his TruthSocial platform shortly after the interview, Trump said that Turnbull “never understood what was going on in China, nor did he have the capacity to do so. I always thought he was a weak and ineffective leader and, obviously, Australian’s agreed with me,” Trump said.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50771
Trump’s Chaos Is a Gift to Xi Jinping, Former Australian PM Says
Ben Westcott and Haidi Lun - March 10, 2025
The second Trump administration’s poor treatment of US allies and global institutions is providing “an opportunity” for China’s president, former Australian Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull said, adding that Canberra needed to try to adopt a more independent defense policy as Washington grows more unreliable.
Turnbull, who led Australia from 2015 until 2018, said the world is seeing a more “undiluted” version of Donald Trump in his second term in office, and that his behavior would be viewed as an “advantage” for China’s President Xi Jinping in international relations over the next four years.
“President Xi will aim to be the exact opposite of Trump,” Turnbull said in an interview with Bloomberg Television in Sydney on Monday. “Where Trump is chaotic, he will be consistent. Where Trump is rude and abusive, he’ll be respectful. Where Trump is erratic, he will be consistent.”
Through that approach, Turnbull said there would be countries that look at “China on the one hand, and Trump on the other” and would “find China a more attractive partner.”
Turnbull was prime minister of Australia for part of Trump’s first term in office, and had a sometimes fractious relationship with the US president at the time.
Posting to his TruthSocial platform shortly after the interview, Trump said that Turnbull “never understood what was going on in China, nor did he have the capacity to do so.”
“I always thought he was a weak and ineffective leader and, obviously, Australian’s agreed with me,” Trump said.
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2025-03-10/trump-s-chaos-is-a-gift-to-xi-jinping-former-australian-pm-says
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/videos/2025-03-10/trump-chaos-a-gift-to-china-former-australia-pm-says-video
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1F3mgdGxVpw
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50773
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22734134 (100843ZMAR25) Notable: Video: US President Donald Trump attacks former prime minister Malcolm Turnbull as 'weak' and 'ineffective' following criticism of White House - US President Donald Trump has launched an attack on former Australian prime minister Malcolm Turnbull, branding him “weak and ineffective”. The comments have been seen as a response to Mr Turnbull warning Trump’s behaviour would give China an opportunity to increase its global influence. President Trump shared the criticism on his Truth Social platform, taking aim at Mr Turnbull’s leadership during his tenure as Australia's prime minister. “Malcolm Turnbull, the former Prime Minister of Australia… never understood what was going on in China, nor did he have the capacity to do so,” President Trump said. “I always thought he was a weak and ineffective leader and, obviously, Australian’s (sic) agreed with me!!!” The Turnbull government concluded with his resignation ahead of an internal leadership ballot which saw him replaced by former prime minister Scott Morrison. The tit-for-tat reflects an ongoing tension between the two men, which began during Mr Turnbull’s tenure as prime minister. The US President cut a conversation with Mr Turnbull short in 2017 after telling him it was his "worst call by far" with a foreign leader that day. However, after working through their disagreements, Mr Turnbull was able to secure an exemption from metals tariffs during the first Trump administration.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50771
US President Donald Trump attacks former prime minister Malcolm Turnbull as 'weak' and 'ineffective' following criticism of White House
Donald Trump has called Malcolm Turnbull “weak” and “ineffective” after the former Australian prime minister criticised the US President's behaviour.
Oscar Godsell - March 10, 2025
US President Donald Trump has launched an attack on former Australian prime minister Malcolm Turnbull, branding him “weak and ineffective”.
The comments have been seen as a response to Mr Turnbull warning Trump’s behaviour would give China an opportunity to increase its global influence.
President Trump shared the criticism on his Truth Social platform, taking aim at Mr Turnbull’s leadership during his tenure as Australia's prime minister.
“Malcolm Turnbull, the former Prime Minister of Australia… never understood what was going on in China, nor did he have the capacity to do so,” President Trump said.
“I always thought he was a weak and ineffective leader and, obviously, Australian’s (sic) agreed with me!!!”
The Turnbull government concluded with his resignation ahead of an internal leadership ballot which saw him replaced by former prime minister Scott Morrison.
In a recent Bloomberg Television interview, Mr Turnbull had warned that Trump’s behaviour in his second term would play into the hands of Chinese President Xi Jinping.
“President Xi will aim to be the exact opposite of Trump… Where Trump is chaotic, he will be consistent. Where Trump is rude and abusive, he’ll be respectful,” he said.
Mr Turnbull, who served as Australia’s prime minister from 2015 to 2018, argued that Trump’s unpredictability would prompt countries to seek out China as a partner.
The tit-for-tat reflects an ongoing tension between the two men, which began during Mr Turnbull’s tenure as prime minister.
The US President cut a conversation with Mr Turnbull short in 2017 after telling him it was his "worst call by far" with a foreign leader that day.
However, after working through their disagreements, Mr Turnbull was able to secure an exemption from metals tariffs during the first Trump administration.
The timing of Trump’s social media post has coincided with renewed concerns over whether Australia will receive an exemption from new 25 per cent metals tariffs.
While steel and aluminium make up a small portion of Australia's total exports, the tariffs could lead to job losses and strain the trade relationship.
Prime Minister Anthony Albanese was able to hold a phone call with President Trump recently, in which the US leader said an exemption was “under consideration”.
Former prime minister Kevin Rudd, who also had a strained relationship with Trump, has been lobbying for an exemption in Washington DC.
https://www.skynews.com.au/australia-news/politics/us-president-donald-trump-attacks-former-prime-minister-malcolm-turnbull-as-weak-and-ineffective-following-criticism-of-white-house/news-story/a93259cde66ab22f0083fccd226e25af
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5mhuUlcNQG4
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50774
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22734149 (100901ZMAR25) Notable: Video: Donald Trump’s tongue-lashing for Malcolm Turnbull leaves no hope on tariffs - "It would be a miracle if Australia were to win an exemption this week from Donald Trump’s new steel and aluminium tariffs after his extraordinary spat with former prime minister Malcolm Turnbull. The Albanese government’s chances of an exception were already sliding fast before the Trump-Turnbull dust-up, with repeated Australian diplomatic overtures falling on deaf ears in the Trump White House. But everyone knows that the only person who really counts in this decision is the President himself, who has until Thursday (AEDT) to grant any exceptions to his 25 per cent tariffs on all steel and aluminium imports. So now the famously glass-jawed Trump has Turnbull’s criticisms ringing in his ears as he decides whether to grant a special exemption to Australia. This will not help. Most presidents would dispassionately separate any criticism from an ex-prime minister from America’s current policy priorities. But Trump has already shown that his presidency is driven as much by moods, whims, emotion, favours and threats as it is by actual policy. The Trump-Turnbull relationship has been turbulent, with Trump lashing out at the then-prime minister in January 2018 only days into his first term with a terse phone call over the so-called “refugee deal”. The two leaders then repaired their relationship to a solid and workable level. Yet since Turnbull left politics he has been an increasingly vocal critic of Trump, saying America under Trump has now become an unreliable ally. Trade Minister Don Farrell has ruled out an 11th-hour trip to Washington for now because the prospects of an exemption seem grim. Anything is possible with Trump, so there is still a small hope of a last-gasp escape. But Trump Mark II seems to like his tariffs even more than Trump Mark I did. The Turnbull spat makes it even less likely that America’s emperor will raise his thumb to spare our steel and aluminium industries from what will be an unjust and unwarranted tax." - Cameron Stewart, Chief International Correspondent at The Australian - theaustralian.com.au
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50725
>>50771
COMMENTARY: Donald Trump’s tongue-lashing for Malcolm Turnbull leaves no hope on tariffs
CAMERON STEWART - 10 March 2025
1/2
It would be a miracle if Australia were to win an exemption this week from Donald Trump’s new steel and aluminium tariffs after his extraordinary spat with former prime minister Malcolm Turnbull.
The Albanese government’s chances of an exception were already sliding fast before the Trump-Turnbull dust-up, with repeated Australian diplomatic overtures falling on deaf ears in the Trump White House.
But everyone knows that the only person who really counts in this decision is the President himself, who has until Thursday (AEDT) to grant any exceptions to his 25 per cent tariffs on all steel and aluminium imports.
So now the famously glass-jawed Trump has Turnbull’s criticisms ringing in his ears as he decides whether to grant a special exemption to Australia. This will not help. Most presidents would dispassionately separate any criticism from an ex-prime minister from America’s current policy priorities. But Trump has already shown that his presidency is driven as much by moods, whims, emotion, favours and threats as it is by actual policy. Some might question why Turnbull would choose to do such a high-profile Bloomberg TV interview just days before the deadline for tariff exemptions.
But the bigger question is why would Trump bother lashing out at a former Liberal prime minister who has not been in office for almost seven years and who clearly does not speak for the current Labor government.
The Trump-Turnbull relationship has been turbulent, with Trump lashing out at the then-prime minister in January 2018 only days into his first term with a terse phone call over the so-called “refugee deal”. The two leaders then repaired their relationship to a solid and workable level.
Yet since Turnbull left politics he has been an increasingly vocal critic of Trump, saying America under Trump has now become an unreliable ally.
However, Turnbull is only one of many Western former leaders who now criticise Trump from the sidelines. Kevin Rudd was one of them before he was muzzled by being appointed Australia’s ambassador in Washington.
What Turnbull said about Trump in the Bloomberg interview was not wrong. He said Trump’s erratic behaviour and his poor treatment of allies was providing “an opportunity” for Chinese President Xi Jinping.
He also made the obvious point that Trump’s tariffs are ultimately self-defeating, saying Trump “seems to have a view that America can prosper at the expense of everyone else, but that’s not going to work”.
The Albanese government would privately agree with both of these comments, although it could never say so.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50775
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22734151 (100904ZMAR25) Notable: Q Post #910 - Do not focus on the call details. We knew it would leak. We knew certain areas of the WH were bugged. We knew certain people would leak. Focus - why AUS? Q - https://qanon.pub/#910
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50774
2/2
Trump’s counter-attack was typically over the top, saying, “I always thought he was a weak and ineffective leader and, obviously, Australian’s (sic) agreed with me” – suggesting he didn’t know Turnbull was toppled by his own Liberal Party rather than voters.
Trump also said Turnbull “never understood what was going on in China, nor did he have the capacity to do so”. This is wrong. Turnbull had many failings as prime minister, but China was not one of them.
The Turnbull government significantly toughened its policies towards China, angering Beijing by banning the Chinese telco Huawei on security grounds and then introducing foreign interference laws.
I was living in Washington as The Australian’s US correspondent at that time and saw first-hand how the Trump administration watched and admired Australia’s tougher approach to Beijing. Australia became a template for Trump’s tougher policy towards China.
Even without the new Trump-Turnbull spat, the chances of Australia winning another exception to steel and aluminium tariffs, as it did in 2018, is looking less likely by the day. Trump initially said he would give “great consideration” to a potential exemption for Australia, but the President’s trade adviser, Peter Navarro, then accused Australia of dumping subsidised steel and aluminium into the US market.
In recent days, Rudd was unable to achieve a breakthrough in a meeting with US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, while Trump’s top economic adviser, Kevin Hassett, said he doubted any exemptions would be granted.
Trade Minister Don Farrell has ruled out an 11th-hour trip to Washington for now because the prospects of an exemption seem grim. Anything is possible with Trump, so there is still a small hope of a last-gasp escape. But Trump Mark II seems to like his tariffs even more than Trump Mark I did.
The Turnbull spat makes it even less likely that America’s emperor will raise his thumb to spare our steel and aluminium industries from what will be an unjust and unwarranted tax.
Cameron Stewart is the Chief International Correspondent at The Australian, combining investigative reporting on foreign affairs, defence and national security with feature writing for the Weekend Australian Magazine. He was previously the paper’s Washington Correspondent covering North America from 2017 until early 2021.
https://www.theaustralian.com.au/commentary/donald-trumps-tonguelashing-for-malcolm-turnbull-leaves-no-hope-on-tariffs/news-story/f1e454990ddfcb0ee95cc3ca8f15dafc
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pvYvR27zENs
https://x.com/TurnbullMalcolm/status/929231984160673792
—
Q Post #479
Jan 6 2018 16:03:28 (EST)
How much did AUS donate to CF?
How much did SA donate to CF?
Compare.
Why is this relevant?
What phone call between POTUS and X/AUS leaked?
List the leadership in AUS.
IDEN leadership during Hussein term.
IDEN leadership during POTUS' term.
Who controls AUS?
Who really controls AUS?
UK?
Why is this relevant?
Q
https://qanon.pub/#479
—
Q Post #908
Mar 10 2018 12:33:37 (EST)
Which conversation leaked?
POTUS & AUS?
Why that specific conversation?
Signal?
We (they) hear what you are saying?
Threat to AUS?
Why?
What do they know?
Trapped?
Forced?
Blood.
Q
https://qanon.pub/#908
—
Q Post 910
Mar 10 2018 12:47:35 (EST)
Do not focus on the call details.
We knew it would leak.
We knew certain areas of the WH were bugged.
We knew certain people would leak.
Focus - why AUS?
Q
https://qanon.pub/#910
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50776
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22740317 (110923ZMAR25) Notable: Video: Fake terror, real fear, and hunt for puppetmaster behind anti-Semitic attacks - All 14 of the alleged offenders arrested over a streak of anti-Semitic crimes have now been charged after it was revealed an organised crime kingpin directed a cabal of Australia-based criminals to orchestrate a raft of attacks now labelled a “fabricated terror plot”. On Monday, the 14 alleged offenders were arrested after eleven simultaneous police raids, with five people charged from the outset. By Tuesday morning, all had been charged with a total of 65 alleged offences, though the supposed kingpin behind the scheme is believed to have evaded arrest so far. The alleged mastermind “pulled the strings” on a spate of Sydney’s anti-Semitic attacks from “afar”, understood to be while based on foreign soil, and had sought to leverage information about an abandoned explosives-laden caravan with police to secure leniency in a separate criminal case. The charges came after dawn raids by NSW Police and Australian Federal Police, who arrested 14 people in relation to a string of the anti-Semitic vandalism and firebombing attacks - bringing the total number of people arrested under state police’s hate-crimes unit to 29 with a total of 143 charges laid. NSW Premier Chris Minns had first labelled the caravan as a potential “mass-casualty event” and “terrorism”. Police have now called it a “criminal con job” and “fabricated terror plot” in a foiled attempt for criminals to use as a bartering tool to reduce their sentences or drop charges. It follows a summer of rising anti-Semitism in NSW, but with police now alleging that the most severe cases had their roots in the sophisticated criminal plot.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50707
>>50769
Fake terror, real fear, and hunt for puppetmaster behind anti-Semitic attacks
ALEXI DEMETRIADI - March 10, 2025
1/3
All 14 of the alleged offenders arrested over a streak of anti-Semitic crimes have now been charged after it was revealed an organised crime kingpin directed a cabal of Australia-based criminals to orchestrate a raft of attacks now labelled a “fabricated terror plot”.
On Monday, the 14 alleged offenders were arrested after eleven simultaneous police raids, with five people charged from the outset.
By Tuesday morning, all had been charged with a total of 65 alleged offences, though the supposed kingpin behind the scheme is believed to have evaded arrest so far.
The alleged mastermind “pulled the strings” on a spate of Sydney’s anti-Semitic attacks from “afar”, understood to be while based on foreign soil, and had sought to leverage information about an abandoned explosives-laden caravan with police to secure leniency in a separate criminal case.
The charges came after dawn raids by NSW Police and Australian Federal Police, who arrested 14 people in relation to a string of the anti-Semitic vandalism and firebombing attacks – bringing the total number of people arrested under state police’s hate-crimes unit to 29 with a total of 143 charges laid.
More than 250 investigators from NSW Police and the AFP carried out 11 search warrants on Monday.
NSW Premier Chris Minns had first labelled the caravan as a potential “mass-casualty event” and “terrorism”. Police have now called it a “criminal con job” and “fabricated terror plot” in a foiled attempt for criminals to use as a bartering tool to reduce their sentences or drop charges.
It follows a summer of rising anti-Semitism in NSW, but with police now alleging that the most severe cases had their roots in the sophisticated criminal plot.
The plot appears to span as far back as an anti-Semitic vandalism attack in Woollahra in December to the discovery of the explosives-laden caravan in Dural, in northwest Sydney, on January 19.
The nine alleged criminals were aged between 18 and 41, with police set to argue their offences ranged from carrying out arson attacks to preparing the cars that ferried vandals across Sydney’s eastern suburbs.
Two men who were already incarcerated - aged 23 and 37 - were taken to Riverstone Police Station where they were arrested and charged. The 27-year-old is accused of: “participate criminal group contribute criminal activity, destroy/damage property intend criminal activity of group¸ drive conveyance taken w/o consent of owner, supply prohibited drug - indictable and possess prohibited drug”.
He is alleged to have carried out a vandalism attack in Queens Park on January 11, while the 37-year-old is alleged to have carried out the Maroubra childcare attack - police also found an unregistered firearm in his storage facility.
“A 31-year-old man was arrested at a Camperdown unit and taken to Newtown Police Station where he was charged with knowingly direct activities of criminal group, five counts of accessory before the fact to malicious damage in company, damage property in company use fire, two counts of destroy property in company use fire and break and enter in company destroy property,” the statement reads.
“Police will allege in court the man was involved in the preparation and staging of motor vehicles and provisioning them with equipment necessary for the commission of the offences.”
He will front Downing Centre Local Court on April 3.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50777
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22740362 (110936ZMAR25) Notable: Video: Former Nomad chief Sayed Moosawi allegedly Bondi firebombing ringleader ‘James Bond’ - A former high-ranking bikie boss was the alleged mysterious “James Bond” who directed criminals for hire to firebomb a Bondi brewery they appeared to mistake for a Jewish kosher deli. After they realised they hit the wrong target, police allege, former Nomad leader Sayed Moosawi - known to his alleged guns-for-hire as “James Bond” – allegedly took matters into his own hands and destroyed the deli himself. Moosawi denies the allegations and intends to fight the charges. It comes as NSW Police and the Australian Federal Police arrested and charged 14 people on Monday linked to Sydney’s recent anti-Semitic attacks, allegedly at the behest of an unknown mastermind - who is not Moosawi – and remains at large. After Monday’s dawn raids and revelations, NSW Police confirmed that all 14 people arrested during that operation had been charged, totalling 65 alleged offences across different anti-Semitic attacks since December. One of those is former Nomads Parramatta chapter president Moosawi, 32, who police allege directed the October brewery firebombing and carried out the deli attack, both in Bondi.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>>/qresearch/22416549 (pb)
>>50707
>>50769
Former Nomad chief Sayed Moosawi allegedly Bondi firebombing ringleader ‘James Bond’
ALEXI DEMETRIADI, JAMES DOWLING and JOANNA PANAGOPOULOS - 11 March 2025
1/2
A former high-ranking bikie boss was the alleged mysterious “James Bond” who directed criminals for hire to firebomb a Bondi brewery they appeared to mistake for a Jewish kosher deli.
After they realised they hit the wrong target, police allege, former Nomad leader Sayed Moosawi – known to his alleged guns-for-hire as “James Bond” – allegedly took matters into his own hands and destroyed the deli himself.
Moosawi denies the allegations and intends to fight the charges.
It comes as NSW Police and the Australian Federal Police arrested and charged 14 people on Monday linked to Sydney’s recent anti-Semitic attacks, allegedly at the behest of an unknown mastermind – who is not Moosawi – and remains at large.
After Monday’s dawn raids and revelations, NSW Police confirmed that all 14 people arrested during that operation had been charged, totalling 65 alleged offences across different anti-Semitic attacks since December.
One of those is former Nomads Parramatta chapter president Moosawi, 32, who police allege directed the October brewery firebombing and carried out the deli attack, both in Bondi.
The Australian previously revealed how two of the arsonists – Craig Bantoft and Guy Finnegan – had carried out orders for cash to destroy the Curley Lewis Brewery at the direction of a man they simply called “James Bond”, in what appeared to be a case of mistaking the business with a nearby kosher deli sharing a similar name.
NSW Police apprehended Moosawi on Monday and charged him with directing a criminal group, and two charges of destroying both the Curley Lewis Brewery and Lewis’ Continental Kitchen.
In the case of the beer house, Moosawi’s charge relates to directing Bantoft and Finnegan to carry out the attack on October 17, whereas he himself is accused of destroying Lewis’ Kitchen, a kosher deli, a few days later.
After Bantoft and Finnegan torched the brewery – they poured petrol under its front door, before then throwing lit paper, which set it alight – they conversed on encrypted messaging chat Signal, revealing they had taken the orders from the unknown man under the alias “James Bond”.
“James Bond” had told Finnegan and Bantoft that they’d “f*cked it up”, and that the target was barely burnt.
“Use f*cked the whole thing now... If use f*cking couldn’t do it from the start then why did use even went there for f*ck me – its not even done 2% burned f*ck me dead (sic),” Bond said.
Bantoft asked Finnegan whether “(James Bond) is paying us or nah”, who responded: “I’m starting to think he has sent us to the wrong place lol.”
Moosawi was refused bail and his matter was briefly mentioned at Waverley Local Court on Tuesday, where his solicitor entered not guilty pleas on his client’s behalf, The Daily Telegraph reported. The solicitor told media outside the court that Moosawi denied the allegations and would fight the charges.
Finnegan and Bantoft pleaded guilty for their involvement in the brewery. Two other men are before the courts accused of also carrying out that second Bondi arson attack.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50778
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22740404 (110944ZMAR25) Notable: ‘We won’t be intimidated’: Wong hits back at Russia over ‘boots on the ground’ warning - The Albanese government has insisted it will not be intimidated by hostile rhetoric from Vladimir Putin’s regime after Russia has warned of grave consequences if Australia contributes to an international peacekeeping force in Ukraine. British Prime Minister Keir Starmer has applauded Prime Minister Anthony Albanese for being willing to contribute to a “coalition of the willing” in Ukraine, while Opposition Leader Peter Dutton has argued it would be against the national interest to send Australian troops to eastern Europe. The Russian embassy in Canberra said in a statement provided to this masthead: “For Australia joining the so-called coalition of the willing would entail grave consequences. “Once again, Western boots on the ground are unacceptable for Russia, and we will not remain passive observers. To those inclined to construe the above as a threat: it is not; it is a warning. “Russia has no intention to harm Australians, and Canberra can easily avoid trouble by simply refraining from irresponsible adventurism in the zone of the special military operation.” A spokesperson for Foreign Minister Penny Wong said: “Our message to Russia is: end your illegal invasion of Ukraine. We won’t be intimidated from working towards a just peace for the people of Ukraine.” The spokesperson said Australia “has a proud tradition of supporting peace through 80 years of contributions to international peacekeeping missions. Such a mission does not yet exist in Ukraine, where Russia continues its brutal and unjustified war,” the spokesperson said. “Australia has said that if we receive a request to support a peacekeeping mission, we’ll consider it.”
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50731
>>50740
>>50765
‘We won’t be intimidated’: Wong hits back at Russia over ‘boots on the ground’ warning
Matthew Knott - March 10, 2025
1/2
The Albanese government has insisted it will not be intimidated by hostile rhetoric from Vladimir Putin’s regime after Russia has warned of grave consequences if Australia contributes to an international peacekeeping force in Ukraine.
British Prime Minister Keir Starmer has applauded Prime Minister Anthony Albanese for being willing to contribute to a “coalition of the willing” in Ukraine, while Opposition Leader Peter Dutton has argued it would be against the national interest to send Australian troops to eastern Europe.
The Russian embassy in Canberra said in a statement provided to this masthead: “For Australia joining the so-called coalition of the willing would entail grave consequences.
“Once again, Western boots on the ground are unacceptable for Russia, and we will not remain passive observers. To those inclined to construe the above as a threat: it is not; it is a warning.
“Russia has no intention to harm Australians, and Canberra can easily avoid trouble by simply refraining from irresponsible adventurism in the zone of the special military operation.”
A spokesperson for Foreign Minister Penny Wong said: “Our message to Russia is: end your illegal invasion of Ukraine.
“We won’t be intimidated from working towards a just peace for the people of Ukraine.”
The spokesperson said Australia “has a proud tradition of supporting peace through 80 years of contributions to international peacekeeping missions”.
“Such a mission does not yet exist in Ukraine, where Russia continues its brutal and unjustified war,” the spokesperson said.
“Australia has said that if we receive a request to support a peacekeeping mission, we’ll consider it.”
Ukraine’s ambassador to Australia, Vasyl Myroshnychenko, urged Australia to ignore the Russian warning.
Russian President Vladimir Putin has made empty threats, including of using nuclear weapons, since the war began to try to scare foreign nations from helping Ukraine, Myroshnychenko said.
“Russia is a rogue state and they simply want everybody to give up on helping Ukraine,” he said.
The Russian embassy said: “Russia has repeatedly made it clear that foreign military presence in Ukraine is totally unacceptable.
“Canberra remains firmly on the side of war along with those in Europe who are betting on continuing and escalating the conflict despite encouraging shifts towards peace negotiations.”
The Russian embassy accused Australia of “lavishly” spending $1.5 billion to “enable Zelensky to send his fellow citizens to an endless and senseless slaughter”.
The embassy statement did not acknowledge that Russia was the aggressor in the war and invaded Ukraine’s sovereign territory in February 2022.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50779
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22740487 (111004ZMAR25) Notable: Backlash over Clive Palmer’s Trumpet of Patriots gender advertisements - Clive Palmer’s Trumpet of Patriots party has pledged to spend more than the record $100 million that his previous political party spent at the 2022 federal election, as transgender advocacy groups voice outrage over a series of political ads published in major newspapers. Transgender Victoria has called on Palmer’s party to retract the “dangerous and hateful ad” that ran in several newspapers on Tuesday, including The Australian, and to apologise, warning of the history of self-harm caused by transphobic comments. The Age, owned by Nine Entertainment, is running the ad on Wednesday. The print ad says in large font: “There are only two genders - male and female.” It then warns, “we must stop confusing children in schools” and give them a “normal, safe” environment to grow up in. “Trumpet of Patriots should retract this campaign and apologise - or acknowledge they will have our blood on their hands,” Transgender Victoria chief executive Son Vivienne told this masthead. The ads were designed to do nothing more than stoke division and provoke outrage “from a fringe political actor desperately looking for attention”, Equality Australia CEO Anna Brown told this masthead. “They do nothing to inform debate or promote any understanding of what are complex issues that affect the most vulnerable people in our community,” Brown said. Australia’s largest regional publisher also apologised for running the same ad on the front page of the Newcastle Herald on Tuesday. “We support freedom of speech and a diversity of views, but on this occasion we let our readers and our staff down,” said Tony Kendall, managing director of Australian Community Media, which publishes the Newcastle paper. The ACM boss said the advertisement did not meet the company’s values, and that it would be removed from the paper’s digital editions.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>>/qresearch/22611022 (pb)
>>50708
Backlash over Clive Palmer’s Trumpet of Patriots gender advertisements
Calum Jaspan - March 11, 2025
1/2
Clive Palmer’s Trumpet of Patriots party has pledged to spend more than the record $100 million that his previous political party spent at the 2022 federal election, as transgender advocacy groups voice outrage over a series of political ads published in major newspapers.
Transgender Victoria has called on Palmer’s party to retract the “dangerous and hateful ad” that ran in several newspapers on Tuesday, including The Australian, and to apologise, warning of the history of self-harm caused by transphobic comments. The Age, owned by Nine Entertainment, is running the ad on Wednesday.
The print ad says in large font: “There are only two genders – male and female.” It then warns, “we must stop confusing children in schools” and give them a “normal, safe” environment to grow up in.
“Trumpet of Patriots should retract this campaign and apologise – or acknowledge they will have our blood on their hands,” Transgender Victoria chief executive Son Vivienne told this masthead.
The ads were designed to do nothing more than stoke division and provoke outrage “from a fringe political actor desperately looking for attention”, Equality Australia CEO Anna Brown told this masthead.
“They do nothing to inform debate or promote any understanding of what are complex issues that affect the most vulnerable people in our community,” Brown said.
Australia’s largest regional publisher also apologised for running the same ad on the front page of the Newcastle Herald on Tuesday.
“We support freedom of speech and a diversity of views, but on this occasion we let our readers and our staff down,” said Tony Kendall, managing director of Australian Community Media, which publishes the Newcastle paper. The ACM boss said the advertisement did not meet the company’s values, and that it would be removed from the paper’s digital editions.
Launched in February, the Trumpet of Patriots party has bought 14 front page advertising spots across all of Australia’s major daily newspapers in the past five days alone, with the mining billionaire launching an advertising blitz and flooding Australia’s mainstream media with controversial messaging on immigration, gender and welcome to Country addresses.
Palmer’s United Australia Party made headlines in 2021 and 2022 for its controversial COVID-19 advertising and record-breaking $100 million election spend.
“He’ll give it a red-hot crack,” a spokesperson for the party told this masthead, when asked about the advertising outlay in the 2025 election.
“If that means going more than previous times, that might be the case.”
This is the final election Palmer and other parties’ advertising spend will not be capped, with Labor and the Liberal parties voting to restrict the kind of outlay seen in previous years.
The Trumpet of Patriots has already booked in almost $4 million in television advertising with the three commercial networks Seven, Nine and Ten in the five metro cities alone – with the election still yet to be called – a source with direct knowledge of the spend, speaking on condition of anonymity, told this masthead.
Numbers from Neilsen Ad Intel show Palmer spent almost $4 million across January and February on metro and regional print and television advertising through his mining company Mineralogy. The television ads were almost identical, however after the launch of the new party, referred to Palmer as the chair of the Trumpet of Patriots.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50780
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22740507 (111014ZMAR25) Notable: Video: ‘Gaslighting!’: Malcolm Turnbull opens fire on Donald Trump, tariff negotiations threatened - Malcolm Turnbull has opened fire on US President Donald Trump, declaring Australia shouldn’t “suck up” to bullies and accusing political leaders of gaslighting voters on the threat he poses to the world. In an extraordinary interview on the ABC’s 7:30 ahead of Australia’s pleas to secure a tariff exemption from the US President, he warned the situation “has changed,” and he was pessimistic of a positive outcome. An unrepentant Mr Turnbull then accused the US President of trying to “extort allies” as he unloaded on his “harassing and bullying” behaviour. “Well, I do not believe that you should give in to bullies, right?” he said. “Trump wants people to suck up to him, and to be sycophantic. And I have dealt with Trump in the past. I mean, you know, the fact is - I stood up to Trump, and got him to do things he didn’t want to do, because I wasn’t being bullied by him. Most of the people, pretty much all of the people I’ve seen, international leaders, that have sucked up to Trump and been sycophants, have been run over. I mean, the reality is - if you suck up to bullies, whether it is global affairs, or in the playground, you just get more bullying. And unfortunately, you know, we are now seeing somebody that is utterly unconstrained. And if the advice is to go and suck up to him, well, where does that get you? I mean, are we just going to become just a conga line of sycophants creeping through the White House, paying homage to this guy and telling him he’s a genius?”
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50725
>>50771
‘Gaslighting!’: Malcolm Turnbull opens fire on Donald Trump, tariff negotiations threatened
Malcolm Turnbull has opened fire on the US President declaring Australia shouldn’t “suck up” to bullies like Donald Trump.
Samantha Maiden - March 11, 2025
1/2
Malcolm Turnbull has opened fire on US President Donald Trump, declaring Australia shouldn’t “suck up” to bullies and accusing political leaders of gaslighting voters on the threat he poses to the world.
In an extraordinary interview on the ABC’s 7:30 ahead of Australia’s pleas to secure a tariff exemption from the US President, he warned the situation “has changed,” and he was pessimistic of a positive outcome.
An unrepentant Mr Turnbull then accused the US President of trying to “extort allies” as he unloaded on his “harassing and bullying” behaviour.
“Well, I do not believe that you should give in to bullies, right?’’ he said.
“Trump wants people to suck up to him, and to be sycophantic. And I have dealt with Trump in the past. I mean, you know, the fact is - I stood up to Trump, and got him to do things he didn’t want to do, because I wasn’t being bullied by him.
“Most of the people, pretty much all of the people I’ve seen, international leaders, that have sucked up to Trump and been sycophants, have been run over.
“I mean, the reality is - if you suck up to bullies, whether it is global affairs, or in the playground, you just get more bullying.
“And unfortunately, you know, we are now seeing somebody that is utterly unconstrained. And if the advice is to go and suck up to him, well, where does that get you?
“I mean, are we just going to become just a conga line of sycophants creeping through the White House, paying homage to this guy and telling him he’s a genius?
“It’s ludicrous! I mean, the leaders of other countries, particularly friendly countries, are among the few people that can speak truth to Trump because he can’t sack them.
Mr Turnbull said the situation was unprecedented.
“Look around us. The impact that Trump is having on the world, on the Western alliance, on markets, on our economies - I mean, these are matters that we have to talk about,’’ he said.
“We cannot continue this bipartisan gaslighting that is going on at the moment where there are these massive changes in Washington affecting us and the whole world.
“I mean, look at the extraordinary treatment of Canada.
“Efforts to basically cripple Canada’s economy in order to bully them into becoming the 51st state.
“This is all unprecedented, but yet, if you look at our political leaders - there’s nothing wrong with AUKUS, everything is fine, the relationship is fine, nothing has changed! Well, it has changed.”
Mr Turnbull said he would not stay silent on the issue despite concerns it might impact tariff negotiations.
“All of this erratic behaviour will be taken advantage of by China, because what China will do is they will say - they’ll be the opposite of Trump, where Trump is erratic, they’ll be consistent,’’ he said.
“Where Trump is rude and abusive...they’ll be respectful. They’ll play a very different game to what they did in the first Trump Administration.
“So you know, look, he’s actively helping Putin in Ukraine, and perhaps not deliberately, but effectively he’s helping Xi Jinping.”
“You know, where people are trying to be friends with both sides, if Trump abuses them, seeks to bully them, puts crippling tariffs on them, they will naturally edge closer to China - of course, they will.”
However, Mr Turnbull clarified he obviously did not include Australia in that group, who might lean towards China.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50781
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22740530 (111023ZMAR25) Notable: Video: In tetchy ABC interview, Turnbull says Australia cannot self-censor to please Trump - Former prime minister Malcolm Turnbull, who secured a tariff exemption from Donald Trump in 2018, has suggested the Albanese government will not be to blame if the US president denies Australia a repeat exemption when American tariffs take hold this week. Mr Turnbull, who made the remarks in a tense ABC Radio National Breakfast interview in which he accused the national broadcaster of adopting a "pusillanimous" approach to criticism of Mr Trump's global trade war, said the circumstances were different in 2025. "This time there will be no exemptions and they will apply right across the board," Mr Turnbull said. He said Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and ambassador Kevin Rudd in Washington had done "as good a job as they can in making the case" for an exemption to 25 per cent tariffs on steel and aluminium imports into the US. But he doubted it would be enough. Mr Turnbull hit back at questions from the ABC about whether his attack on Mr Trump would undermine Australia's case for an exemption. "Are you suggesting that we should engage in self-censorship in Australia for fear of offending the huge ego of Donald Trump?" he asked. "Is that really the state that we've got to? Surely we should be free to speak the truth. Or are we going to muzzle ourselves for fear of offending Mr Trump?"
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50725
>>50771
>>50780
In tetchy ABC interview, Turnbull says Australia cannot self-censor to please Trump
Jacob Greber - 11 March 2025
Former prime minister Malcolm Turnbull, who secured a tariff exemption from Donald Trump in 2018, has suggested the Albanese government will not be to blame if the US president denies Australia a repeat exemption when American tariffs take hold this week.
Mr Turnbull, who made the remarks in a tense ABC Radio National Breakfast interview in which he accused the national broadcaster of adopting a "pusillanimous" approach to criticism of Mr Trump's global trade war, said the circumstances were different in 2025.
"This time there will be no exemptions and they will apply right across the board," Mr Turnbull said.
He said Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and ambassador Kevin Rudd in Washington had done "as good a job as they can in making the case" for an exemption to 25 per cent tariffs on steel and aluminium imports into the US.
But he doubted it would be enough.
"I hope they are successful, [but] it's just a different circumstance," he said.
"We have to face up to that."
He added that while the impact of the tariffs, which are due to kick in on Thursday, was "obviously not good for our steel and aluminium exporters" they would still have access to the global market.
"The real problem with Trump's tariff wars or tariff campaign is the impact it's going to have on the global economy," he said.
Mr Turnbull's remarks followed a blistering row with the US president, who took to social media on Monday to attack the former Australian prime minister as weak and ineffective. The barbs came in the hours after a Bloomberg interview in which Mr Turnbull described the US president as "chaotic, rude, abrasive and erratic".
Turnbull says Australia cannot 'muzzle' itself in fear of Trump
On Tuesday morning, Mr Turnbull hit back at questions from the ABC about whether his attack on Mr Trump would undermine Australia's case for an exemption.
"Are you suggesting that we should engage in self-censorship in Australia for fear of offending the huge ego of Donald Trump?" he asked.
"Is that really the state that we've got to? Surely we should be free to speak the truth. Or are we going to muzzle ourselves for fear of offending Mr Trump?"
Mr Turnbull suggested Australia follow the approach adopted by the new prime minister of Canada, Mark Carney, who won his position over the weekend after an aggressive campaign of criticism of Mr Trump.
"Is the ABC becoming so pusillanimous that you're seriously suggesting that we shouldn't be free to speak the truth in Australia for fear of Donald Trump?"'
When Mr Turnbull accused ABC Radio National breakfast presenter Sally Sara of "apparently" not "standing up for Australia", she pushed back, telling him not to "put words in my mouth, with respect".
"It's my job to ask questions about your comments and this is at a time where there's a significant trade decision underway … I'm asking about the timing of your comments," Ms Sara responded.
Mr Turnbull said he was "always happy to come on your show" but that "we've got to be honest with each other".
"I secured an exemption in 2018. The arguments I successfully used then are being used again and they're good arguments. They remain the same," he said.
"However, I've always said that I think the chances of getting an exemption are very, very low," he said, noting top White House trade official Peter Navarro's comments in recent weeks that Australian aluminium exporters were "killing" the US market.
"The Trump administration regrets giving exemptions last time because once they gave an exemption to Australia, then they ended up having to give an exemption to somebody else and somebody else."
Mr Turnbull's remarks on Australia's tariff negotiations undermine the Coalition's position that Mr Albanese, Treasurer Jim Chalmers and Trade Minister Don Farrell should pull off a repeat exemption.
Shadow Foreign Affairs Minister David Coleman last week said the arguments made by the Turnbull government in 2018 about why Australian exporters should not face US tariffs were "even stronger today than they were in 2018".
"We expect the Labor government to succeed in its effort to secure an exemption on US tariffs for steel and aluminium," Mr Coleman said in a speech to the Australia Institute on Thursday.
"After all, the Coalition secured the same exemptions back in 2018."
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-03-11/turnbull-self-censor-trump-interview/105033838
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50782
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22740576 (111034ZMAR25) Notable: Video: Malcolm Turnbull torpedoes talks over Trump’s tariffs with TV blast - Australia’s hopes of securing an exemption from Donald Trump’s steel and aluminium tariffs this week have been dealt a blow after the US President lashed Malcolm Turnbull - who won a carve-out from Mr Trump’s first-term tariffs – as a “weak and ineffective leader”. The withering attack on the former prime minister came after Australia’s ambassador to the US, Kevin Rudd, failed to make headway in last-ditch talks with the Trump administration on a hoped-for waiver. Trade Minister Don Farrell on Monday ruled out an eleventh-hour trip to Washington to press Australia’s case as Anthony Albanese discussed contingency plans with the nation’s steel and aluminium producers. The attack on Mr Turnbull came after the former prime minister warned the President’s abuse of the US’s closest allies was providing “an opportunity” for China’s President Xi Jinping. Responding to Mr Trump’s attack, Mr Turnbull told the ABC’s 7.30 the President was a bully who wanted people to suck up to him. “Are we just going to become just a conga line of sycophants creeping through the White House, paying homage to this guy and telling him he’s a genius? It’s ludicrous,” he said. Opposition trade spokesman Kevin Hogan said if the government failed to win an exemption “they will have failed dismally in a critical task”. He said Mr Albanese had “lacked the courage” to travel to Washington DC for face-to-face talks with Mr Trump, in contrast to Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba. Mr Hogan said Labor’s efforts fell short of those of the Coalition, pointing to the Turnbull government’s success in gaining an exemption to Mr Trump’s 2018 steel and aluminium tariffs.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50725
>>50771
>>50780
>>50781
Malcolm Turnbull torpedoes talks over Trump’s tariffs with TV blast
BEN PACKHAM and SARAH ISON - 10 March 2025
1/2
Australia’s hopes of securing an exemption from Donald Trump’s steel and aluminium tariffs this week have been dealt a blow after the US President lashed Malcolm Turnbull – who won a carve-out from Mr Trump’s first-term tariffs – as a “weak and ineffective leader”.
The withering attack on the former prime minister came after Australia’s ambassador to the US, Kevin Rudd, failed to make headway in last-ditch talks with the Trump administration on a hoped-for waiver.
Trade Minister Don Farrell on Monday ruled out an eleventh-hour trip to Washington to press Australia’s case as Anthony Albanese discussed contingency plans with the nation’s steel and aluminium producers.
The attack on Mr Turnbull came after the former prime minister warned the President’s abuse of the US’s closest allies was providing “an opportunity” for China’s President Xi Jinping.
In a post on his Truth Social network, Mr Trump wrote: “Malcolm Turnbull, the former Prime Minister of Australia who was always leading that wonderful country from ‘behind,’ never understood what was going on in China, nor did he have the capacity to do so. I always thought he was a weak and ineffective leader and, obviously, Australian’s (sic) agreed with me!!!”
Mr Turnbull had earlier told Bloomberg television that Mr Trump risked a recession with his tariff agenda and he expected Mr Xi to take “massive advantage” of his presidency.
“Where Trump is chaotic, he will be consistent. Where Trump is rude and abusive, he’ll be respectful. Where Trump is erratic, he will be consistent,” the former prime minister said.
Mr Turnbull also said the world was seeing a “more undiluted Trump second time round”.
Responding to Mr Trump’s attack, Mr Turnbull told the ABC’s 7.30 the President was a bully who wanted people to suck up to him.
“Are we just going to become just a conga line of sycophants creeping through the White House, paying homage to this guy and telling him he’s a genius? It’s ludicrous,” he said.
Senator Farrell said Dr Rudd had been unable to achieve a breakthrough in a Saturday meeting with US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, though it remained unclear whether Australian exporters would be hit when details of the tariffs plan were unveiled on Thursday (AEDT).
“They’re continuing to engage in discussions. Hopefully we get a satisfactory outcome,” he said.
Senator Farrell said while Australian officials would continue to press the nation’s case, he was not planning a last-ditch trip to the US to try to sway the outcome.
“I certainly won’t be going in the next three days,” he said. “I’m watching intently what’s going to happen over the next three days and then we’ll make some decisions.”
In a phone call with the Prime Minister last month, Mr Trump pledged to give “great consideration” to Australia’s request for an exemption, acknowledging the US’s trade surplus with Australia.
But the government has grown nervous after comments by senior US officials, including the President’s trade adviser, Peter Navarro, who have accused Australia of dumping subsidised steel and aluminium on the US market.
The Prime Minister said the government would continue to work with the Trump administration and Australian companies in the firing line, in an effort to avert the impost.
“We are partners with the United States through our free-trade agreement and will continue to advocate for Australia’s national interests,” Mr Albanese said. “And I’m engaging as well with Australian companies or based companies such as Rio Tinto and BlueScope to seek a positive outcome. It is in Australia’s interest, but it’s also in the economic interests of the United States for Australia to be exempted from tariffs that of course just increased prices for the purchaser of those goods.
“The United States enjoys a trade surplus with Australia and has done so since the Truman presidency.”
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50783
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22740621 (111048ZMAR25) Notable: Australia had one trump card to shield it from the tariff war. It just disappeared. - The Albanese government’s bid to secure a last-minute exemption from Donald Trump’s steel and aluminium tariffs has been hit by the revelation Australia has run its first monthly trade surplus with the United States, undermining a key argument used to try to convince the US president to grant a carve-out. With the clock ticking until the 25 per cent metal tariffs are due to come into effect on Wednesday afternoon Australian time, government officials said they were locked in intense discussions with their US counterparts but had not secured a prized exemption from the White House. Figures from the Australian Bureau of Statistics show that in January, America imported more than $6 billion worth of goods from Australia. The previous monthly record, of almost $3 billion, was set in December. Offsetting the exports were $4.3 billion of imports, leaving Australia with a $1.7 billion trade surplus. It is the first time since the bureau started collating monthly trade data in January 1988 that Australia has run a surplus with the United States, due almost entirely to a 92-fold increase in the amount of gold US importers bought between November and January. Australian officials have tried to use increased American access to Australia’s plentiful supply of critical minerals as a bargaining chip in the tariff negotiations, but there were no public signs this had proved decisive with the White House. The Coalition is preparing to blame Albanese and US ambassador Kevin Rudd, rather than Turnbull, if the exemption push fails, including by attacking the prime minister for not travelling to Washington to lobby Trump ahead of the deadline.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50725
>>50771
Australia had one trump card to shield it from the tariff war. It just disappeared.
Shane Wright, Matthew Knott and Mike Foley - March 11, 2025
The Albanese government’s bid to secure a last-minute exemption from Donald Trump’s steel and aluminium tariffs has been hit by the revelation Australia has run its first monthly trade surplus with the United States, undermining a key argument used to try to convince the US president to grant a carve-out.
With the clock ticking until the 25 per cent metal tariffs are due to come into effect on Wednesday afternoon Australian time, government officials said they were locked in intense discussions with their US counterparts but had not secured a prized exemption from the White House.
Former prime minister Malcolm Turnbull, who has been feuding with Trump after criticising the president in a television interview, said he thought it “very, very unlikely” that Australia would be spared.
Declaring he will not self-censor from harsh criticism of Trump, Turnbull writes in an opinion piece for this masthead: “It has always been most unlikely that Australia will secure an exemption this time. It was hard enough in 2018 and all the signals from the administration are that the tariffs will be applied across the board.”
Labor frontbencher Patrick Gorman accused Turnbull of “immature” language for calling Trump an erratic bully, raising the possibility the government will seek to blame him, at least in part, if the exemption push fails.
While he said he did not believe Turnbull’s remarks would make a huge difference to the US-Australia relationship, Gorman, the assistant minister to Prime Minister Anthony Albanese, said: “I wouldn’t use language like that when it comes to an elected official of any of our trading or security partners, least of which the United States.
“I don’t think that’s appropriate or helpful language.”
The Coalition is preparing to blame Albanese and US ambassador Kevin Rudd, rather than Turnbull, if the exemption push fails, including by attacking the prime minister for not travelling to Washington to lobby Trump ahead of the deadline.
The ASX200 plunged to a seven-month low, losing another $25 billion on Tuesday, because of the widespread expectation that Trump would push ahead with across-the-board tariffs.
Figures from the Australian Bureau of Statistics show that in January, America imported more than $6 billion worth of goods from Australia. The previous monthly record, of almost $3 billion, was set in December.
Offsetting the exports were $4.3 billion of imports, leaving Australia with a $1.7 billion trade surplus. It is the first time since the bureau started collating monthly trade data in January 1988 that Australia has run a surplus with the United States, due almost entirely to a 92-fold increase in the amount of gold US importers bought between November and January.
Australian officials have tried to use increased American access to Australia’s plentiful supply of critical minerals as a bargaining chip in the tariff negotiations, but there were no public signs this had proved decisive with the White House.
Trump has regularly argued that one of the reasons for his tariff agenda is America’s large trade deficits with nations such as China. In its bid to avoid planned steel and aluminium tariffs, due to start on Wednesday, the federal government has repeatedly pointed out the US runs a rare trade surplus with Australia.
As recently as Monday, Albanese noted the traditional trade imbalance between the two nations.
“The United States enjoys a trade surplus with Australia, and has done so since the Truman presidency,” he said.
But JP Morgan senior economist Tom Kennedy said the most recent data did not help Australia’s cause.
“The timing of this sudden shift is interesting given the global mood music, with the Trump administration’s tariff policies targeted towards trading partners that maintain structural surpluses versus the US,” he said.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50784
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22740661 (111103ZMAR25) Notable: OPINION: I won’t be gaslit over Trump. If you suck up to him, you will get more bullying - "On Monday afternoon, as I was walking back to my office after giving an interview to Bloomberg News, US President Donald Trump posted on his Truth Social platform. I was, he claimed, a weak and ineffectual leader and didn’t know what was going on in China. “Australian’s”[sic], he said, agreed with him. The points I made in the interview, I had made many times, and they were hardly original. His trade war, I said, risked recession. Wall Street agrees. And I pointed out that his chaotic style of government, bullying friends and allies - threatening to annex Canada and seize Greenland, not to speak of abandoning Ukraine – made the United States look like a very unreliable ally. This would be exploited by China, I said, which this time round would seek to be as unlike Trump as possible. China would be consistent where Trump was erratic, respectful where he was abusive. This differentiation would, I said, cause many countries which were not closely aligned to the US to hedge towards China. This was all obvious, but it clearly triggered the president, late on Sunday night in Washington. Punctuation aside, his “truth” said more about his thin-skinned, volatile temperament than it did about me. I was so “weak and ineffectual” that I stood my ground in the face of his fury, and finally persuaded him to honour a refugee deal I had done with President Obama. And then I was so “weak and ineffectual” that I managed to persuade him to give Australia an exemption from steel and aluminium tariffs in 2018. The United States under Trump is not the America we have been used to. And he doesn’t pretend it is. He does not respect the international rules-based order any more than he respects alliances and treaties. He is imposing swingeing tariffs on Canada and Mexico despite having signed the USMCA free trade agreement himself with both countries in 2018. We need to have an honest conversation about this - the gaslighting has to stop. We cannot assume that an America which believes “might is right” can be relied upon as an ally." - Malcolm Turnbull, Prime Minister of Australia from 2015 to 2018 - theage.com.au
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50725
>>50771
>>50780
>>50781
OPINION: I won’t be gaslit over Trump. If you suck up to him, you will get more bullying
Malcolm Turnbull, Former prime minister - March 11, 2025
1/2
On Monday afternoon, as I was walking back to my office after giving an interview to Bloomberg News, US President Donald Trump posted on his Truth Social platform. I was, he claimed, a weak and ineffectual leader and didn’t know what was going on in China. “Australian’s”[sic], he said, agreed with him.
The points I made in the interview, I had made many times, and they were hardly original. His trade war, I said, risked recession. Wall Street agrees. And I pointed out that his chaotic style of government, bullying friends and allies – threatening to annex Canada and seize Greenland, not to speak of abandoning Ukraine – made the United States look like a very unreliable ally.
This would be exploited by China, I said, which this time round would seek to be as unlike Trump as possible. China would be consistent where Trump was erratic, respectful where he was abusive. This differentiation would, I said, cause many countries which were not closely aligned to the US to hedge towards China.
This was all obvious, but it clearly triggered the president, late on Sunday night in Washington.
Punctuation aside, his “truth” said more about his thin-skinned, volatile temperament than it did about me. I was so “weak and ineffectual” that I stood my ground in the face of his fury, and finally persuaded him to honour a refugee deal I had done with President Obama. And then I was so “weak and ineffectual” that I managed to persuade him to give Australia an exemption from steel and aluminium tariffs in 2018.
At the time, I was told not to stand up to him. I was told to flatter him, suck up to him, offer him things. I didn’t do that, and I achieved very good outcomes for Australia.
Trump is a bully – that is like saying the Pope’s a Catholic – and if you suck up to him, you will just get more bullying. Of course there are plenty of grifters who want to get some financial benefit or other by ingratiating themselves with Trump and his entourage. But Australia, and Australians, should have higher standards than a K Street lobbyist.
I was not surprised to see the News Corp publications gleefully adopting Trump’s abuse and claiming that I had “torpedoed” any hopes of securing an exemption from steel and aluminium tariffs. It has always been most unlikely that Australia will secure an exemption this time. It was hard enough in 2018 and all the signals from the administration are that the tariffs will be applied across the board.
And it perhaps never occurred to the team at News Corp’s Holt Street HQ in Sydney that it is utterly bizarre that the unremarkable comments of a former prime minister would cause the US to decide not to exempt Australia from tariffs. Not a word of criticism of Mr Trump, of course!
I was amused to reflect on the mental stress this episode was causing our friends at News Corp. Such a target-rich environment! They can blame me for the tariffs, or Kevin Rudd, or Anthony Albanese. Surely they can work out a formula where it’s the fault of all three – but never, ever the fault of Donald Trump!
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50785
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22746198 (120826ZMAR25) Notable: America First:Donald Trump rejects Australia's bid for exemption from steel and aluminium tariffs- Australia will not be granted an exemption from US tariffs on aluminium and steel imports, the White House says. US President Donald Trump had previously said he would consider excluding Australia from the 25 per cent tariffs, which take effect on Wednesday. But White House spokeswoman Karoline Leavitt has now told the ABC: "He considered it, and considered against it. There will be no exemptions." Asked why, Ms Leavitt said: "America First steel. If they want to be exempted, they should consider moving steel manufacturing here," she said. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese described the decision as "entirely unjustified". "This is against the spirit of our two nations' enduring friendship, and fundamentally at odds with the benefits that our economic partnership has delivered over more than 70 years," Mr Albanese said. "Australia will continue working hard for a different outcome and discussions with the Trump administration are ongoing." Hopes for a reprieve from the tariffs were buoyed last month when Mr Trump promised "great consideration" after a warm phone call with Mr Albanese. But they were later dashed when Mr Trump's trade guru Peter Navarro said Australia was "killing" American aluminium. Speaking to the ABC at the White House on Tuesday, local time, Mr Navarro said Australia was among countries that "abused" tariff exemptions granted during Mr Trump's first term. "There were many country exemptions given, not just to Australia but to many other countries, and every single country abused those exemptions," he said.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50725
>>50756
>>50771
Donald Trump rejects Australia's bid for exemption from steel and aluminium tariffs
Carrington Clarke and Tom Crowley - 12 March 2025
1/2
Australia will not be granted an exemption from US tariffs on aluminium and steel imports, the White House says.
US President Donald Trump had previously said he would consider excluding Australia from the 25 per cent tariffs, which take effect on Wednesday.
But White House spokeswoman Karoline Leavitt has now told the ABC:
"He considered it, and considered against it. There will be no exemptions."
Asked why, Ms Leavitt said: "America First steel."
"If they want to be exempted, they should consider moving steel manufacturing here," she said.
Prime Minister Anthony Albanese described the decision as "entirely unjustified".
"This is against the spirit of our two nations' enduring friendship, and fundamentally at odds with the benefits that our economic partnership has delivered over more than 70 years," Mr Albanese said.
"Australia will continue working hard for a different outcome and discussions with the Trump administration are ongoing."
Hopes for a reprieve from the tariffs were buoyed last month when Mr Trump promised "great consideration" after a warm phone call with Mr Albanese. But they were later dashed when Mr Trump's trade guru Peter Navarro said Australia was "killing" American aluminium.
Speaking to the ABC at the White House on Tuesday, local time, Mr Navarro said Australia was among countries that "abused" tariff exemptions granted during Mr Trump's first term.
"There were many country exemptions given, not just to Australia but to many other countries, and every single country abused those exemptions," he said.
"The collective result was to weaken the tariffs to the point that they simply didn't provide any protection anymore.
"So what the lesson from the first Trump tariffs has been is that exemptions to anybody are counterproductive. They don't work for the American people."
Asked if a future carve-out for Australia was still possible, he said:
"The policy is no exemptions, no exclusions, and that will change if the president changes his policy. But there's a very good reason why 'no exemptions, no exclusions' exists as a policy.
"It's because when we were kind enough as a country to make those kind of gestures to our friends, they bit the hand that fed them, and that's not going to happen again."
Mr Navarro has been accusing Australia of dumping cheap, government-subsidised aluminium into the US in breach of an agreement reached during Trump's first term, when Australia was exempted from similar tariffs.
A recent flurry of Washington meetings involving ambassador Kevin Rudd and Treasurer Jim Chalmers have yielded little evidence of progress towards an exemption, and Foreign Minister Penny Wong admitted a fortnight ago Australia had a "hill to climb".
On Wednesday, Senator Wong said the tariffs were "not good for the American economy and it's not the the way to treat a friend and partner".
Mr Albanese said steel and aluminium exports to the US represented less than 0.2 per cent of the total value of Australian exports, and neither product was in the top 10 Australian exports to the US.
Australia argues that, unlike most countries, it usually imports more from the US than it exports there, a trade surplus for the US contrasting with the trade deficits it has with most other countries, and which infuriate Mr Trump.
Then-prime minister Malcolm Turnbull successfully mounted the same argument during the first Trump administration. But his recent criticisms of Mr Trump resulted in an angry rebuke from the US president, who used social media to label the former PM a "weak and ineffective leader".
Deputy Opposition Leader Susan Ley said Mr Albanese should have travelled to Washington to plead Australia's case this time around.
"One thing we do know about the Trump administration is that it's about personal relationships," Ms Ley said on Sky News.
"It's about building the personal networks and the communication one-on-one. And that's what Anthony Albanese has clearly not done."
Mr Albanese said it was hypocritical for the opposition to frequently pressure him to travel abroad to deal with global issues, but criticise him whenever he leaves the country.
The tariffs are part of a broader suite of protectionist measures implemented by the Trump administration.
Earlier on Tuesday, Mr Trump said aluminium and steel imports from Canada would be subject to 50 per cent tariffs — double those imposed on other partners, as part of an escalating trade war between the North American neighbours.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50786
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22746250 (120848ZMAR25) Notable: Video: ‘Entirely unjustified’: Albanese blasts Trump as tariffs smash into election frame - The prospect of a punishing series of new imposts on Australian exports to the United States could play havoc with Anthony Albanese’s re-election bid as debate over who can best handle the Trump administration emerges as a key campaign issue. The US president’s decision not to grant Australia an exemption from 25 per cent tariffs on steel and aluminium before they came into effect on Wednesday afternoon (AEDT) left the government fuming. In the prime minister’s most critical comments since Donald Trump’s return to office, Albanese accused the president of breaching the spirit of Australia’s friendship with the US. Government sources said Australian officials presented a significant written proposal over the weekend to afford the US special access to Australia’s critical minerals reserves in exchange for a tariff exemption, but the offer failed to sway the Trump administration. Opposition Leader Peter Dutton declared the imposition of the tariffs a “bad day for Australia” as he blasted the prime minister for failing to secure a second phone call with Trump as the tariff deadline approached. As he confirmed that Trump had rebuffed his attempts to speak over recent days, Albanese said the decision not to grant Australia a tariff carve-out on $1 billion worth of exports was “entirely unjustified” and “very harsh”.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50725
>>50771
>>50785
‘Entirely unjustified’: Albanese blasts Trump as tariffs smash into election frame
Matthew Knott - March 12, 2025
1/2
The prospect of a punishing series of new imposts on Australian exports to the United States could play havoc with Anthony Albanese’s re-election bid as debate over who can best handle the Trump administration emerges as a key campaign issue.
The US president’s decision not to grant Australia an exemption from 25 per cent tariffs on steel and aluminium before they came into effect on Wednesday afternoon (AEDT) left the government fuming.
In the prime minister’s most critical comments since Donald Trump’s return to office, Albanese accused the president of breaching the spirit of Australia’s friendship with the US.
Government sources said Australian officials presented a significant written proposal over the weekend to afford the US special access to Australia’s critical minerals reserves in exchange for a tariff exemption, but the offer failed to sway the Trump administration.
Opposition Leader Peter Dutton declared the imposition of the tariffs a “bad day for Australia” as he blasted the prime minister for failing to secure a second phone call with Trump as the tariff deadline approached.
As he confirmed that Trump had rebuffed his attempts to speak over recent days, Albanese said the decision not to grant Australia a tariff carve-out on $1 billion worth of exports was “entirely unjustified” and “very harsh”.
“This goes against the spirit of our two nations’ enduring friendship and is fundamentally at odds with the benefit of our economic partnership that has delivered over more than 70 years,” he said.
While he ruled out retaliatory tariffs against the US, Albanese called on Australians to buy local products, such as Bundaberg soft drinks rather than American-made beverages, and promised extra support in this month’s budget.
The government is now bracing for the possibility that Trump will hit Australian agricultural and pharmaceutical exporters with tariffs at the start of April, a date likely to coincide with the beginning of the federal election campaign.
A furious Industry Minister Ed Husic accused the US of “a dog act after over a century of friendship”, saying: “Australians have stood by, and stood with Americans for many decades. In fact, Australians have spilt blood alongside Americans in different conflicts.”
Trump’s tariff agenda roiled global sharemarkets as investors, increasingly worried about an American recession, sold off their holdings.
The ASX200 lost 1.3 per cent, or more than $37 billion, on Wednesday, leaving it at its lowest level in 100 days.
Asked why Trump had decided against an exemption, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said: “America first steel. If they want to move their steel manufacturers here, they’re welcome to do so.”
Labelling the tariff move as “not a friendly act”, Albanese said: “Quite clearly it is not a positive step in a relationship ... I think Australians will look at this decision and will be concerned that our friends in the United States have chosen to impose these tariffs on Australia, given that Australia does not impose tariffs on the United States.”
Trump said in a February 11 phone call with Albanese that he would consider a tariff exemption for Australia, but the prime minister was unable to get the president on the line for a follow-up discussion.
Albanese said the government had “put in a request for a conversation again to take place in recent days” and that he would continue to lobby for an exemption.
Asked whether he should have travelled to Washington to argue for a carve-out, Albanese pointed out that no nation had received an exemption, including those whose leaders had held White House meetings with Trump.
Signalling plans to shore up Australian industry, Albanese said the Buy Australia campaign would get additional support in the March 25 budget.
Dutton rubbished the government for failing to secure an exemption, saying: “We don’t believe that an outcome wasn’t possible – we negotiated an outcome with America when the Coalition was in government in 2018.
“This prime minister has failed because the president won’t take the call or grant a meeting with Anthony Albanese. It shows how incompetent and how hopeless this prime minister is.”
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50787
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22746286 (120901ZMAR25) Notable: Video: Albanese says 'unjustified' US tariffs on Australia poor way to treat a friend - The prime minister has lashed "entirely unjustified" US tariffs being imposed on Australian steel and aluminium, saying it is a poor way for the United States to treat a friend. The White House has confirmed it won't grant Australia or any other nation an exemption from tariffs imposed from today, part of US President Donald Trump's designs to bring more manufacturing to the United States. A 25 per cent tariff on Australian steel and aluminium will begin from later today. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese confirmed Australia would not retaliate with tariffs of its own, but said the US president's tariffs were an act of "economic self-harm". "Australia has a close relationship with the United States. Friends need to act in a way that reinforces, to our respective populations, the fact that we are friends," Mr Albanese said. "This is not a friendly act. But it is imposed on every country, that is important." The Coalition, meanwhile, has accused the prime minister of failing to secure a meeting with Mr Trump. "It's obvious that Anthony Albanese and [ambassador] Kevin Rudd have had a shocker," Opposition Leader Peter Dutton said. Earlier, Foreign Minister Penny Wong warned ordinary Americans would feel the pain of the "unprovoked and unjustified" tariffs. "Guess who will pay the price of this? It's actually Americans, American consumers. These tariffs will harm the ordinary American and the American economy," she told Sky News. "[It is] not the way to treat a friend and partner".
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50725
>>50771
>>50785
Albanese says 'unjustified' US tariffs on Australia poor way to treat a friend
Jake Evans and Stephen Dziedzic - 12 March 2025
1/2
The prime minister has lashed "entirely unjustified" US tariffs being imposed on Australian steel and aluminium, saying it is a poor way for the United States to treat a friend.
The White House has confirmed it won't grant Australia or any other nation an exemption from tariffs imposed from today, part of US President Donald Trump's designs to bring more manufacturing to the United States.
A 25 per cent tariff on Australian steel and aluminium will begin from later today.
Prime Minister Anthony Albanese confirmed Australia would not retaliate with tariffs of its own, but said the US president's tariffs were an act of "economic self-harm".
"Australia has a close relationship with the United States. Friends need to act in a way that reinforces, to our respective populations, the fact that we are friends," Mr Albanese said.
"This is not a friendly act. But it is imposed on every country, that is important."
The Coalition, meanwhile, has accused the prime minister of failing to secure a meeting with Mr Trump.
"It's obvious that Anthony Albanese and [ambassador] Kevin Rudd have had a shocker," Opposition Leader Peter Dutton said.
Earlier, Foreign Minister Penny Wong warned ordinary Americans would feel the pain of the "unprovoked and unjustified" tariffs.
"Guess who will pay the price of this? It's actually Americans, American consumers. These tariffs will harm the ordinary American and the American economy," she told Sky News.
"[It is] not the way to treat a friend and partner".
Senator Wong added for the same reason she believed tariffs would not be good for US consumers, retaliatory tariffs would "add to Australians' cost of living".
Mr Albanese said the government did not believe the matter was final, noting it took many months during the previous Trump administration for Australia to secure exemptions on that occasion.
But he said today's refusal was harmful.
"This is against the spirit of our two nations' enduring friendship and fundamentally at odds with the benefit of our economic partnership that has delivered over more than 70 years," the prime minister said.
However, he noted that Australian steel and aluminium exports to the US made up only 0.2 per cent of the total value of Australia's exports, while flagging there would be further support for the industry in the coming federal budget through the government's "Buy Australian" campaign.
Asked whether he thought it would damage the alliance, Trade Minister Don Farrell responded: "I hope it doesn't."
He added he did not believe there was "any intention on the part of the United States government to give us an exemption...
"If the Americans had simply told us right at the start, 'forget about it, there is going to be no exemptions'... looking back at what's happened over the last few weeks, that would have been a far easier situation."
'Real offers' made to US, but details kept secret
Initial hope that repeat exemptions could be granted has faded in recent days, as their start date neared.
While Australian officials were never optimistic about securing an exemption, there was still a belief that they might be able to land an agreement with the White House.
One government source told the ABC the fact that Trump's most senior advisers held lengthy discussions with Australian ambassador Kevin Rudd and senior Australian officials on the tariffs sent a clear signal Washington might be open to a carve-out.
They also said Australia made "real offers" to the US in the hope of securing an exemption — although they declined to say what Australia put on the table.
The prime minister also refused to go into detail on those talks, saying diplomacy was best conducted behind closed doors.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50788
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22751358 (130811ZMAR25) Notable: Hate speech laws won’t be repealed, says Minns - NSW Premier Chris Minns has ruled out any repeal of hate speech laws passed last month, following revelations that a raft of recent anti-Semitic attacks were orchestrated by an unnamed person with organised crime connections. On Wednesday the NSW Greens claimed the attacks were “not motivated by anti-Semitism” and that the Minns government had “massively overreacted and jumped the gun with their knee jerk overreaching criminal laws”. “I expect that the parliament will shortly be considering whether these unnecessary and reactive laws should be repealed, and so we should,” Greens MLC Sue Higginson said. The NSW Council for Civil Liberties has also demanded an inquiry into whether Mr Minns “misled the parliament and public in order to pass the Places of Worship Bill and the Inciting Racial Hatred Bill”. “The Minns Labor government has played right into the hands of those who concocted the caravan plot in using it to drive a repressive and fear-based legislative agenda that has further divided the community”, NSWCCL president Timothy Roberts said. However. the Premier on Thursday reiterated that the legislation would not be repealed. “Our laws criminalised intentionally and publicly inciting hatred towards another person, or group, based on race,” Mr Minns said. “They send a clear message: the people of NSW to stand together against inciting racial hatred in our great multicultural state. NSW has seen hundreds of anti-Semitic attacks and incidents. This racial hatred has caused our Jewish community to live in fear in their own state. While the caravan was part of a criminal conspiracy - and not the plot of a terrorist organisation – it was still appalling racial hatred.”
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>>/qresearch/22521616 (pb)
>>50707
>>50776
Hate speech laws won’t be repealed, says Minns
STEPHEN RICE - 13 March 2025
NSW Premier Chris Minns has ruled out any repeal of hate speech laws passed last month, following revelations that a raft of recent anti-Semitic attacks were orchestrated by an unnamed person with organised crime connections.
On Wednesday the NSW Greens claimed the attacks were “not motivated by anti-Semitism” and that the Minns government had “massively overreacted and jumped the gun with their knee jerk overreaching criminal laws”.
“I expect that the parliament will shortly be considering whether these unnecessary and reactive laws should be repealed, and so we should,” Greens MLC Sue Higginson said.
The NSW Council for Civil Liberties has also demanded an inquiry into whether Mr Minns “misled the parliament and public in order to pass the Places of Worship Bill and the Inciting Racial Hatred Bill”.
“The Minns Labor government has played right into the hands of those who concocted the caravan plot in using it to drive a repressive and fear-based legislative agenda that has further divided the community”, NSWCCL president Timothy Roberts said.
However. the Premier on Thursday reiterated that the legislation would not be repealed.
“Our laws criminalised intentionally and publicly inciting hatred towards another person, or group, based on race,” Mr Minns said. “They send a clear message: the people of NSW to stand together against inciting racial hatred in our great multicultural state.
NSW has seen hundreds of anti-Semitic attacks and incidents. This racial hatred has caused our Jewish community to live in fear in their own state. While the caravan was part of a criminal conspiracy – and not the plot of a terrorist organisation – it was still appalling racial hatred.”
On Monday, NSW and Federal police revealed a mystery overseas kingpin had masterminded a string of attacks on Sydney’s Jewish community by allegedly recruiting teenagers, low-level criminals and drug addicts to carry out his orders.
In simultaneous dawn raids, police arrested 14 people in relation to a series of vandalism and firebombing attacks – bringing the total number of people arrested under state police’s hate-crimes unit to 29, with 143 charges laid.
The plot appears to span as far back as an anti-Semitic vandalism attack in Woollahra in December to the discovery of the explosives-laden caravan in Dural, in northwest Sydney, on January 19. After that discovery Mr Minns labelled it a terror event.
Police now say it was a “criminal con job” and “a fabricated terror plot” in a foiled attempt by an unidentified criminal to gain a bartering tool to reduce his sentence or drop charges.
However, at a budget estimates hearing on Wednesday, Police Minister Yasmin Catley declined to answer questions about whether the government was made aware of doubts about the terror claims before the hate speech laws were pushed through parliament.
Ms Catley said she would not “share confidential briefings that I get from senior police”.
At the same hearing, NSW Deputy Police Commissioner David Hudson said investigators told Mr Minns on 20 January that they were treating the caravan incident “as a terrorist event” but was told “that it could be part of a criminal conspiracy”.
Mr Hudson said police had ruled out a terrorism threat on February 21 – the same day the hate speech legislation was pushed through parliament – but he declined to elaborate on what information had led to the revised assessment, citing ongoing investigations.
Mr Hudson conceded that the ideology of the suspected mastermind was “still under investigation”.
“While these laws were drafted in response to horrifying anti-Semitism, we have always made clear they would apply to anyone, preying on any person.
“In response to calls for the laws to be scrapped, doing so would be a toxic message to our community that this kind of hate speech is acceptable when it’s not. These laws are very important to maintaining social cohesion.”
NSW Jewish Board of Deputies president David Ossip welcomed the Premier’s statement, saying: “Regardless of motive, the fact remains that the Jewish community was viciously targeted over summer in a premeditated series of serious attacks.
“It is also evident that this plot was only conceived of, and could have only succeeded to the extent it did, by exploiting already-strained social cohesion and unprecedented levels of anti-Semitism in Sydney.”
https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/hate-speech-laws-wont-be-repealed-says-minns/news-story/593cac6c1afca5ad7afae4f66158bc03
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50789
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22751361 (130817ZMAR25) Notable: Video: ‘Dumpers’: US lashes Australia on trade as Canada, EU hit back over Trump’s tariffs - Canada and the European Union have swiftly retaliated against US President Donald Trump’s metal tariffs, while Australia has joined its regional allies by copping the taxes without a response but continuing to press for an exemption. Meanwhile, US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, with whom Australia was negotiating in the days leading up to the tariffs being finalised, singled out Australia for criticism, accusing it of subsidising cheap aluminium exports. “You’ve got dumpers in the rest of the world. Japan dumps steel, China dumps steel … we’re going to stop that nonsense and bring steel here,” Lutnick told Fox Business on Wednesday (Thursday AEDT). “We’re not going to stand for China dumping, Japan dumping … Australia does a lot of aluminium at below cost. I mean, this has got to end, and the president is on it, and he’s protecting America.” Australia’s ambassador to the US, Kevin Rudd, met Lutnick in the past few days to argue the case for an Australian exemption. That was ruled out by the White House hours before the tariffs began. No country has been granted a carve-out. Joe Courtney, a Democrat who co-chairs the Friends of Australia caucus in Congress, noted Australia had just paid the first $800 million of a total $5 billion contribution to the US shipbuilding industry under the terms of the AUKUS defence agreement. “The Trump tariffs that went into effect today are a senseless slap in the face,” he said.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50725
>>50771
>>50785
‘Dumpers’: US lashes Australia on trade as Canada, EU hit back over Trump’s tariffs
Michael Koziol - March 13, 2025
Washington: Canada and the European Union have swiftly retaliated against US President Donald Trump’s metal tariffs, while Australia has joined its regional allies by copping the taxes without a response but continuing to press for an exemption.
Meanwhile, US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, with whom Australia was negotiating in the days leading up to the tariffs being finalised, singled out Australia for criticism, accusing it of subsidising cheap aluminium exports.
“You’ve got dumpers in the rest of the world. Japan dumps steel, China dumps steel … we’re going to stop that nonsense and bring steel here,” Lutnick told Fox Business on Wednesday (Thursday AEDT).
“We’re not going to stand for China dumping, Japan dumping ... Australia does a lot of aluminium at below cost. I mean, this has got to end, and the president is on it, and he’s protecting America.”
Australia’s ambassador to the US, Kevin Rudd, met Lutnick in the past few days to argue the case for an Australian exemption. That was ruled out by the White House hours before the tariffs began. No country has been granted a carve-out.
Joe Courtney, a Democrat who co-chairs the Friends of Australia caucus in Congress, noted Australia had just paid the first $800 million of a total $5 billion contribution to the US shipbuilding industry under the terms of the AUKUS defence agreement.
“The Trump tariffs that went into effect today are a senseless slap in the face,” he said.
Prime Minister Anthony Albanese described the tariff decision as “entirely unjustified” and “not a friendly act” but ruled out retaliatory measures, saying Canberra would continue to press for an exemption instead.
That aligned it more closely with regional partners South Korea and Japan, as well as Mexico, which have opted to wait and see rather than respond immediately to the steel and aluminium tariffs.
Britain’s Labour Prime Minister, Keir Starmer, also exercised caution, saying the UK would take a “pragmatic approach” but keep all options on the table.
However, Canada and the EU took strident counter-measures.
Canada, the largest supplier of steel to the US, announced new 25 per cent tariffs on $C30 billion ($33 billion) worth of US goods that will also hit computers, sports equipment and cast-iron products.
Canadian Finance Minister Dominic LeBlanc said the new tariffs were in addition to levies on a separate $33 billion worth of US goods enacted this week. “We will not stand idly by while our iconic steel and aluminium industries are being unfairly targeted,” he said.
The EU resuscitated its retaliatory tariffs from Trump’s first term, targeting textiles, bourbon, jeans, peanut butter, motorcycles and other products worth about $45 billion.
European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen said consumer prices would rise and jobs were at stake. “We deeply regret this measure. Tariffs are taxes. They are bad for business and even worse for consumers.”
Trump was undeterred when asked about the escalating trade war as he met Ireland’s taoiseach (prime minister), Micheal Martin, in the Oval Office. He disputed that the unpredictability of near-daily changes in tariff policy was undermining market confidence.
“I have the right to adjust,” he said. “It’s not called inconsistency, it’s called flexibility.”
Lutnick said only a significant increase in domestic US production would lead to the steel and aluminium tariffs being wound back.
“Nothing’s going to stop that until we’ve got a big strong domestic steel and aluminium capability. National security rises above all other things,” he told Fox Business.
Australia’s $1 billion of steel and aluminium exports to the US constitute a small fraction of America’s annual imports of those metals.
But Canberra fears Australian agricultural and pharmaceutical products could be hit by a fresh wave of Trump tariffs due to begin on April 2.
https://www.smh.com.au/world/north-america/australia-lashed-on-trade-by-us-as-eu-canada-hit-back-over-tariffs-20250313-p5lj6a.html
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GrtkJCk7vZU
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50790
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22751389 (130837ZMAR25) Notable: Clive Palmer shares policy priorities for Trumpet of Patriots - Clive Palmer has called for banks to cap interest rates at 3 per cent, and for Kevin Rudd to be sacked as Australia’s ambassador to the US, sharing his multi-pronged pitch to get Trumpet for Patriots candidates into parliament at this year’s election. The mining magnate claimed the party already had more than 20,000 members of Australia, with “thousands of people” joining everyday, since he announced his backing of the fringe group on February 19. Addressing the National Press Club in Canberra, Mr Palmer described spending millions on politics, like his $100m cash splash to install a single candidate in the Senate, as “his golf”, claiming that he finds it “more exciting” than lawn bowls. “At 70, I could join many Australians and play lawn bowls. I find this more exciting,” he said. Mr Palmer also shared his policy push to voters included a two-prong approach to boost home ownership, proposing an interest rate cap of 3 per cent, while also allowing buyers to use their superannuation to fund up to a 30 per cent deposit. He said this would also put more rental homes on the market. He also said Trumpet of Patriots would campaign for Australian superannuation funds to only invest in Australian businesses, a ban on trans athletes, and a 15 per cent licence fee on iron ore. Trumpet of Patriots will aim to run candidates across all 150 electorates and senate seats. However, no decisions have been made on preferencing, with Mr Palmer backing neither leader and calling both major parties “whingers”.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50708
>>50779
Clive Palmer shares policy priorities for Trumpet of Patriots
JESSICA WANG - 13 March 2025
Clive Palmer has called for banks to cap interest rates at 3 per cent, and for Kevin Rudd to be sacked as Australia’s ambassador to the US, sharing his multi-pronged pitch to get Trumpet for Patriots candidates into parliament at this year’s election.
The mining magnate claimed the party already had more than 20,000 members of Australia, with “thousands of people” joining everyday, since he announced his backing of the fringe group on February 19.
Addressing the National Press Club in Canberra, Mr Palmer described spending millions on politics, like his $100m cash splash to install a single candidate in the Senate, as “his golf”, claiming that he finds it “more exciting” than lawn bowls.
“At 70, I could join many Australians and play lawn bowls. I find this more exciting,” he said.
“I’m devoted, because I also have an investment in Australia. I’ve got four children.
“I think this is a good place, and it’s worth fighting for, and that’s just my view. You’ve got the freedom to disagree.”
Mr Palmer also shared his policy push to voters included a two-prong approach to boost home ownership, proposing an interest rate cap of 3 per cent, while also allowing buyers to use their superannuation to fund up to a 30 per cent deposit.
He said this would also put more rental homes on the market.
“That means Australians can live again, that means that our rentals will be available for people at a much lower price,” he said.
“Nearly a third of our Australians are renting at the moment, and this country, to its disgrace, has 120,000 homeless people that have nowhere to live.”
Mr Palmer also called for Mr Rudd to be bought back from Washington.
“There are not too many ambassadors in Washington that have insulted the President of the United States, Kevin Rudd ranks alone in that,” Mr Palmer said.
“Australia needs an effective representative in Washington that can support our nation in its time of turmoil, in a time when our living standards are declining and when Australian people are going hungry.”
While he declined to say who he would pick for the posting, he backed the work of former ambassadors Kim Beazley and Joe Hockey.
“I think somebody that can have a rapport. They either get somebody that has got some sort of relationship,” he said, answering questions from journalists while chowing down on Tim Tams.
“There are many prominent Australians that do that with the Trump administration already, or you get someone that’s neutral.”
He also said Trumpet of Patriots would campaign for Australian superannuation funds to only invest in Australian businesses, a ban on trans athletes, and a 15 per cent licence fee on iron ore.
Trumpet of Patriots will aim to run candidates across all 150 electorates and senate seats.
However, no decisions have been made on preferencing, with Mr Palmer backing neither leader and calling both major parties “whingers”.
“One of the problems with (Anthony) Albanese and Labor and Peter Dutton and his Liberals is that they’re whingers,” he said.
“They look at what’s wrong. They don’t look at how we solve the problem.
“They don’t provide solutions and leadership to solve the serious issues facing every Australians every day of the week, whether it’s housing, whether it’s a cost of living, a whole range of things.”
The party will be led by NSW Hunter candidate Suellen Wrightson who will challenge Labor incumbent Dan Repacholi.
https://www.theaustralian.com.au/breaking-news/clive-palmer-shares-policy-priorities-for-trumpet-of-patriots/news-story/c7ef40e7a80391aa8f042b63bfc377b1
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50791
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22751403 (130848ZMAR25) Notable: Donald Trump will play the wildcard in the federal campaign - "Donald Trump has injected himself into the Australian election landscape in a profound and destabilising way. There are the obvious direct effects, such as the steel and aluminium tariffs imposed just weeks before the beginning of a federal election campaign demonstrate. But there are also indirect consequences. The intangible. There may be two major parties contesting the election but there are now three boxers in the ring. Anthony Albanese has decided that rolling over and playing dead in the face of Trump’s harrying behaviour will not serve either his or the nation’s interests. There is a view that there may now be political advantage for the Prime Minister in taking Trump on. His language in response to Trump’s rejection of Australia’s request for an exemption was the strongest he has used. But it is limited to the rhetorical. There is no reciprocal action planned. And for the simple reason that because of the erratic nature of his method, there is still a chance he may change his mind. While this is unlikely, for Albanese it’s a case of just having to bat on. The Prime Minister has a fine line to walk. His response has to be accountable beyond the obvious partisan political necessity. He also must consider that even if he wins the election, Trump won’t stop being an issue. The risks for Dutton are no less. A Coalition source this week was quoted as saying Trump winning was good for Dutton, Trump governing is bad for Dutton. This has some substance. While Dutton is acutely aware of the dangers that he will be assessed by voters through a prism of Trumpism, there are aspects that remind people of Trump. Dutton’s political persona as the tough guy plays to this. While Dutton has been seeking to avoid a culture war approach, there are synergies with the Coalition’s campaign slogan - getting Australia back on track – and the Make America Great Again movement. At the very least both sides acknowledge that Trump is the wildcard in the Australian federal election context. Anything could happen and most probably will." - Simon Benson - theaustralian.com.au
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50708
>>50785
Donald Trump will play the wildcard in the federal campaign
SIMON BENSON - 13 March 2025
1/2
Donald Trump has injected himself into the Australian election landscape in a profound and destabilising way.
There are the obvious direct effects, such as the steel and aluminium tariffs imposed just weeks before the beginning of a federal election campaign demonstrate.
But there are also indirect consequences. The intangible.
A new lens is being cast over the domestic political contest with the uncertainty and unpredictability of Trump for the global economy and geostrategic situation. This presents deep risks for both Labor and the Coalition.
This is no longer a case of irrational “Trump derangement syndrome”. It is the consequential reaction to real policy and political outcomes.
There may be two major parties contesting the election but there are now three boxers in the ring. Anthony Albanese has decided that rolling over and playing dead in the face of Trump’s harrying behaviour will not serve either his or the nation’s interests.
There is a view that there may now be political advantage for the Prime Minister in taking Trump on. His language in response to Trump’s rejection of Australia’s request for an exemption was the strongest he has used.
But it is limited to the rhetorical. There is no reciprocal action planned. And for the simple reason that because of the erratic nature of his method, there is still a chance he may change his mind.
While this is unlikely, for Albanese it’s a case of just having to bat on. The Prime Minister has a fine line to walk. His response has to be accountable beyond the obvious partisan political necessity.
He also must consider that even if he wins the election, Trump won’t stop being an issue.
The suggestion that there could be political recovery in being more belligerent, as has been the case with Canada, misreads the relationship and the lesser magnitude of what Trump is imposing on Australia.
Trump isn’t threatening Australia’s sovereignty.
Incoming Canadian prime minister Mark Carney has seen domestic support galvanise behind his left-wing government through a defiance of Trump.
On the surface, it would be easy to assume that Albanese might have taken some cue from the Canadian response. Domestically, he will be happy to have Australians blame Trump rather than him for the tariffs. But there are bigger issues that require Albanese to take a more responsible and cautious approach. AUKUS is one of them.
What is assured in this tempest of uncertainty is that this issue will percolate through the Australian election. As will the broader and deeper issue of Trump himself and the brand of politics he represents.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50792
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22761798 (150236ZMAR25) Notable: Meet Mr Big: The mastermind police claim is behind fake ‘terror caravan’ - A Sydney businessman who fled Australia by boat while on bail over an alleged 600kg drug importation can be revealed as the man police believe is behind the contrived “terror caravan” plot. Sayet Erhan Akca, 35, a former gym and childcare centre owner, was allegedly hoping to leverage a lenient court outcome by providing information about the fabricated plan to police. The married father-of-one has been overseas - darting between Asia and Turkey – since police say he hid in a boat to flee the country in mid 2023. Police sources told The Daily Telegraph that Akca, who left behind wife Georgia and a toddler son in Sydney’s south, was possibly using the hoax caravan plot and related anti-Semitic attacks as a bargaining tool to get back home to his wife - who is not accused of any wrongdoing – and son. It is not unusual for crooks to offer up information about planned crimes or the location of drugs and weapons as leverage for a reduced prison term or to have charges dropped, a police source said. Akca first came to the attention of authorities in 2021 when he was arrested in the Australian Federal Police’s Operation Ironside sting and charged with attempting to import a commercial quantity of drugs using the messaging app AN0M. If found guilty, Akca could be facing life in jail. But he fled while on bail and a warrant for his arrest was issued in September 2023. Police now allege Akca is the mastermind behind the explosives-laden caravan planted on a roadside at Dural, and a string of anti-Semitic attacks in Sydney since October.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50707
>>50769
>>50776
Meet Mr Big: The mastermind police claim is behind fake ‘terror caravan’
A Sydney businessman who fled Australia by boat while on bail for an alleged 600kg drug importation can be revealed as the man hoping to benefit from the “terror caravan” plot.
Josh Hanrahan and Clementine Cuneo - March 13, 2025
A Sydney businessman who fled Australia by boat while on bail over an alleged 600kg drug importation can be revealed as the man police believe is behind the contrived “terror caravan” plot.
Sayet Erhan Akca, 35, a former gym and childcare centre owner, was allegedly hoping to leverage a lenient court outcome by providing information about the fabricated plan to police.
The married father-of-one has been overseas – darting between Asia and Turkey – since police say he hid in a boat to flee the country in mid 2023.
Police sources told The Daily Telegraph that Akca, who left behind wife Georgia and a toddler son in Sydney’s south, was possibly using the hoax caravan plot and related anti-Semitic attacks as a bargaining tool to get back home to his wife – who is not accused of any wrongdoing – and son.
It is not unusual for crooks to offer up information about planned crimes or the location of drugs and weapons as leverage for a reduced prison term or to have charges dropped, a police source said.
Akca first came to the attention of authorities in 2021 when he was arrested in the Australian Federal Police’s Operation Ironside sting and charged with attempting to import a commercial quantity of drugs using the messaging app AN0M.
If found guilty, Akca could be facing life in jail.
But he fled while on bail and a warrant for his arrest was issued in September 2023.
Police now allege Akca is the mastermind behind the explosives-laden caravan planted on a roadside at Dural, and a string of anti-Semitic attacks in Sydney since October.
AFP Deputy Commissioner Krissy Barrett this week said police allege the criminal acts were masterminded by one person.
“We believe the person pulling the strings wanted changes to their criminal status but maintained a distance from their scheme and hired local criminals to carry out parts of their plan. However, the plan was foiled,” Ms Barrett said.
She said investigators were confident “very early on” after the caravan was found on January 19 that it was a hoax, but she said the threat had to be treated at its highest.
“The caravan was never going to cause a mass-casualty event, but instead was concocted by criminals who wanted to cause fear for personal benefit,” she said.
“Put simply, the plan was the following: Organise someone to buy a caravan, place it with explosives and written material of anti-Semitic nature, leave it in a specific location and then once that happens, inform law enforcement about an impending terror attack against Jewish Australians.”
A source said there was still work being done to bring the overseas alleged mastermind back to Australia.
NSW Police Deputy Commissioner Dave Hudson said police believe all the anti-Semitic attacks in the city since December “link back to the same common source”.
These include the firebombing of a childcare centre at Maroubra and graffiti attacks on homes and cars in the eastern suburbs.
On Tuesday, 14 people were arrested and charged with dozens of offences in connection with the anti-Semitic incidents.
https://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/truecrimeaustralia/police-courts-nsw/meet-mr-big-the-mastermind-police-claim-is-behind-fake-terror-caravan/news-story/591124b1d12812bae5e480515bf3ad20
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50793
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22761810 (150238ZMAR25) Notable: Sayet Erhan Akca, mastermind allegedly behind caravan ‘terror’ plot, posted vile anti-Semitic slurs - The fugitive alleged to be behind the “terror caravan plot” posted vile anti-Semitic slurs for years before fleeing Australia, after being charged with alleged drug importation offences. Police believe Sayet Erhan Akca, a former gym and child care centre owner, was hoping to leverage a lenient court sentence by providing fabricated information to police about the discovery of an explosives laden caravan and a series of anti-Semitic arson and graffiti attacks in Sydney. In recent statements, police had downplayed claims that the kingpin - who they still have not publicly identified - was motivated by anti-Semitism. However The Australian can reveal that Akca posted a series of anti-Semitic and anti-Israeli slurs over a period of many years as he was building his gym business. In one post Akca claims that “Hitler was only washing earth, they made him out to be evil”. In 2018 he posted: “How did 6 million die when only 3.2 registered Jews in Europe at the time?” In response to a report that vandals targeted the Jewish community spraying swastikas on cars, he responded: “Zeig heil.” The former gym and childcare centre owner has been living in Asia and Turkey since leaving Australia in mid-2023 while on bail over charges of attempting to import a commercial quantity of drugs using the AN0M messaging app.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50707
>>50769
>>50792
Sayet Erhan Akca, mastermind allegedly behind caravan ‘terror’ plot, posted vile anti-Semitic slurs
STEPHEN RICE and WILL SEITAM - March 14, 2025
1/2
The fugitive alleged to be behind the “terror caravan plot” posted vile anti-Semitic slurs for years before fleeing Australia, after being charged with alleged drug importation offences.
Police believe Sayet Erhan Akca, a former gym and child care centre owner, was hoping to leverage a lenient court sentence by providing fabricated information to police about the discovery of an explosives laden caravan and a series of anti-Semitic arson and graffiti attacks in Sydney.
In recent statements, police had downplayed claims that the kingpin - who they still have not publicly identified - was motivated by anti-Semitism.
However The Australian can reveal that Akca posted a series of anti-Semitic and anti-Israeli slurs over a period of many years as he was building his gym business.
In one post Akca claims that “Hitler was only washing earth, they made him out to be evil”.
In 2018 he posted: “How did 6 million die when only 3.2 registered Jews in Europe at the time?”
In response to a report that vandals targeted the Jewish community spraying swastikas on cars, he responded: “Zeig heil.”
In 2022 he posted: “Why was no one this caring about Palestine, Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya or Syria? Oh.. cause western invasion is ok. But eastern is evil. There has never been a war, only a big guy bullying a small guy for self interest.”
A relative responded: “Good on you mate you’re talking hundred per cent right. Your dad must be proud of you.”
The former gym and childcare centre owner has been living in Asia and Turkey since leaving Australia in mid-2023 while on bail over charges of attempting to import a commercial quantity of drugs using the AN0M messaging app.
After visiting a mosque in Istanbul in 2018 and what appears to be a picture of himself praying, Akca posted a bizarre “common question” about whether it was true “that Muslims believe they get 40 virgins for act of terror / mass suicidal murder?”
His Answer:”Let me ask, would you like to pop 40 cherries ? Would you like to change 40 bed sheets ? So Yes, we believe that you go straight to hell for killing yourself or any of Gods creatures unless it’s for eating purpose and done the Halal (natural) way. Not with a c4. #DumbestTheorySinceFlatEarth. No Pun Intended... but no one besides the educated would understand that anyway.”
As far back as 2016 Akca was posting claims that: “America gets caught funding $540M to produce ‘isis’ videos”.
In December 2016 he posted “R.I.P. to all those innocents that have died in Aleppo and around the world in the hands of Terrorism, and I mean from the root of Terrorism, America and the Zionists, taking out these people like Saddam, Bin Ladin & Gadaffi, look what its started.
“You still think 9/11 was not an inside job to start this money making and muslim massacre process, delete yourself now.”
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50794
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22761846 (150254ZMAR25) Notable: Jewish leader slams cops and politicians for dismissing anti-Semitic motive in ‘terror hoax’ - Australia’s peak Jewish body has slammed police and politicians as “reckless and irresponsible” for dismissing anti-Semitism as a motivating factor behind a series of violent attacks, following revelations the alleged mastermind has a long history of extreme anti-Semitic views. In an unprecedented rebuke, Executive Council of Australian Jewry co-chief executive Alex Ryvchin said recent statements claiming the attacks were “unconnected to anti-Semitic ideology” had led to increased harassment and vilification of Jews. “It has exposed dangerous failings by authorities, political leaders and public figures who chose to characterise the firebombings that hit Jewish targets as a hoax or con-job unconnected to anti-Semitic ideology and to do so before the investigation had been concluded,” he said. Mr Ryvchin accepted that in some instances, authorities may have been trying to calm the community by downplaying or dismissing anti-Semitism as a motivating factor, “but the effect was the exact opposite”, he said. “It set off a deluge of anti-Semitic conspiracy theories about ‘inside jobs’, and increased harassment and vilification of Jews. This has all diverted the discussion from how to keep Australians safe and reclaim our status as a peaceful country for all. We count on others to keep us safe, provide us with vital information and make statements that ease the crisis and not contribute to it. They need to do better.”
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50707
>>50769
>>50792
Jewish leader slams cops and politicians for dismissing anti-Semitic motive in ‘terror hoax’
STEPHEN RICE and WILL SEITAM - 14 March 2025
1/2
Australia’s peak Jewish body has slammed police and politicians as “reckless and irresponsible” for dismissing anti-Semitism as a motivating factor behind a series of violent attacks, following revelations the alleged mastermind has a long history of extreme anti-Semitic views.
In an unprecedented rebuke, Executive Council of Australian Jewry co-chief executive Alex Ryvchin said recent statements claiming the attacks were “unconnected to anti-Semitic ideology” had led to increased harassment and vilification of Jews.
“It has exposed dangerous failings by authorities, political leaders and public figures who chose to characterise the firebombings that hit Jewish targets as a hoax or con-job unconnected to anti-Semitic ideology and to do so before the investigation had been concluded,” he said.
On Friday The Australian revealed that Sayet Erhan Akca, the fugitive alleged to be behind the “terror caravan plot” and a string of arson and graffiti attacks on Jewish targets, had posted vile anti-Semitic slurs for years before fleeing Australia, after being charged with alleged drug importation offences.
On social media, the 35-year-old praised Hitler, questioned the existence of the Holocaust, said Zionists were “at the root of terrorism” and claimed 9/11 was an “inside job” to start a Muslim “massacre process”.
At a press conference on Monday police said the mastermind of the attacks – who they have still not publicly identified – was hoping to leverage a lenient court sentence by providing fabricated information to police about the explosives-laden caravan and the other attacks.
The attacks were carried out by low-level criminals and drug addicts who had no anti-Semitic views and were being led by criminals for personal gain, police said.
AFP Deputy Commissioner Krissy Barrett said the caravan plot “was never going to cause a mass-casualty event, but instead was concocted by criminals who wanted to cause fear for personal benefit.” Ms Barrett said “within hours” investigators had determined that it posed no threat, calling the incident a “criminal con job” and “fabricated terror plot”.
NSW Deputy Police Commissioner Dave Hudson was asked specifically: “You don’t have evidence that it is being driven by hate, you say it’s alleged that it’s organised crime?”
“Correct”, Mr Hudson replied.
Asked again to confirm that anti-Semitism was not an ideology “for anyone higher up, pulling strings”, Mr Hudson avoided a direct answer, simply stating that: “I think these organised crime figures have taken an opportunity to play on the vulnerability of the Jewish community.”
The police statements were used by Greens MPs and others to claim the attacks were “not motivated by anti-Semitism” and to demand hate-speech laws be repealed. However, in social media posts unearthed by The Australian, Akca posted a series of anti-Semitic and anti-Israeli slurs over a period of many years as he was building his gym business.
In one post Akca claims that “Hitler was only washing earth, they made him out to be evil”.
In another he asked: “How did 6 million die when only 3.2 registered Jews in Europe at the time?”
In response to a report that vandals targeted the Jewish community, spraying swastikas on cars, he responded: “Zeig heil.”
In 2022 he posted: “Why was no one this caring about Palestine, Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya or Syria? Oh … cause western invasion is ok. But eastern is evil. There has never been a war, only a big guy bullying a small guy for self interest.”
Mr Ryvchin accepted that in some instances, authorities may have been trying to calm the community by downplaying or dismissing anti-Semitism as a motivating factor, “but the effect was the exact opposite”, he said.
“It set off a deluge of anti-Semitic conspiracy theories about ‘inside jobs’, and increased harassment and vilification of Jews. It also enabled some to pursue their self-serving agenda, ranging from shutting down discussion of the anti-Semitism crisis to undermining law reform and settling scores with political opponents.
“This has all diverted the discussion from how to keep Australians safe and reclaim our status as a peaceful country for all. We count on others to keep us safe, provide us with vital information and make statements that ease the crisis and not contribute to it. They need to do better.”
At a press conference on Friday, Anthony Albanese claimed the Australian Federal Police had “made it very clear, as have the police agencies, what the motivation of this was”.
“This is a criminal organisation seeking advantage, and whether that person, or people, involved also have hate towards Jewish people, it certainly created fear, as I’ve said, repeatedly.”
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50795
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22761954 (150323ZMAR25) Notable: Albanese, Dutton split on peacekeepers as Putin responds to ceasefire call - Australia will be asked to send peacekeepers to Ukraine in a plan being put to national leaders at a European summit this weekend, despite signs of dissent as Russian president Vladimir Putin places new conditions on a ceasefire. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese will join the talks on Saturday night (AEDT), and is willing to consider a small deployment as a show of support with other democracies to defend international law. But the idea is turning into a heated political row after Opposition Leader Peter Dutton stepped up his warnings against sending personnel to keep the peace, while saying he backed Ukraine in its attempts to turn back the Russian invasion. British Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer invited Albanese to join the summit in a phone hook-up with other members of a potential “coalition of the willing” to commit peacekeepers if Ukraine and Russia can reach an agreement to stop the war. Britain and France have committed to sending troops, and Spain has indicated some support for the mission, while more than 20 leaders from European and Commonwealth nations are expected to join the online meeting. This includes Albanese and New Zealand Prime Minister Christopher Luxon as well as Canadian prime minister-elect Mark Carney. Albanese made no commitment to send troops when asked about the meeting on Friday, but condemned Russia for its invasion and criticised Dutton for ruling out the additional help for Ukraine. Dutton said he had supported Ukraine “from day one” in the conflict, such as by sending Bushmaster vehicles when he was defence minister in the previous government, but he said this did not extend to putting Australian troops on the ground.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50731
>>50765
>>50778
Albanese, Dutton split on peacekeepers as Putin responds to ceasefire call
David Crowe - March 14, 2025
1/2
Australia will be asked to send peacekeepers to Ukraine in a plan being put to national leaders at a European summit this weekend, despite signs of dissent as Russian president Vladimir Putin places new conditions on a ceasefire.
Prime Minister Anthony Albanese will join the talks on Saturday night (AEDT), and is willing to consider a small deployment as a show of support with other democracies to defend international law.
But the idea is turning into a heated political row after Opposition Leader Peter Dutton stepped up his warnings against sending personnel to keep the peace, while saying he backed Ukraine in its attempts to turn back the Russian invasion.
British Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer invited Albanese to join the summit in a phone hook-up with other members of a potential “coalition of the willing” to commit peacekeepers if Ukraine and Russia can reach an agreement to stop the war.
Britain and France have committed to sending troops, and Spain has indicated some support for the mission, while more than 20 leaders from European and Commonwealth nations are expected to join the online meeting. This includes Albanese and New Zealand Prime Minister Christopher Luxon as well as Canadian prime minister-elect Mark Carney.
In a setback to the plan, Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni will not join the meeting and is said to be “not convinced” by the plan to deploy the troops on Ukrainian soil. One issue for Italy is whether the deployment is backed by a United Nations mandate.
Albanese made no commitment to send troops when asked about the meeting on Friday, but condemned Russia for its invasion and criticised Dutton for ruling out the additional help for Ukraine.
“In order to have a peacekeeping mission you need to have a peace, so we look forward to there being peace in Ukraine,” he said.
“But we don’t have to think very hard about which side we’re on in this conflict. Russia is the aggressor. Russia invaded a sovereign nation in Ukraine and has committed atrocities against civilians, against civilian infrastructure as well, and it is an illegal and immoral war.”
Dutton said he had supported Ukraine “from day one” in the conflict, such as by sending Bushmaster vehicles when he was defence minister in the previous government, but he said this did not extend to putting Australian troops on the ground.
“The prime minister is wanting to commit thousands of our troops to go and serve in Europe. It just doesn’t make any sense. I think the prime minister is out of his depth when it comes to national security,” he said.
Albanese has not said he wants to send thousands of troops to Ukraine. This masthead asked the prime minister’s office to respond to Dutton’s claim, but it declined to comment.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50796
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22761999 (150335ZMAR25) Notable: Video: Australia's ambassador to the US, Kevin Rudd, details efforts to sway Donald Trump on steel and aluminium tariffs - Australia's ambassador to the United States Kevin Rudd has promised to put his "shoulder to the wheel" to secure better trade relations with a "hardline" US but warned negotiations with the second Trump administration will continue to be "rough". The US on Wednesday refused to grant a tariff exemption to Australia on steel and aluminium imports to the United States, causing a political storm. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese labelled the act "not the way to treat a friend" and "entirely unjustified". Opposition Leader Peter Dutton accused Mr Albanese and former PM Mr Rudd of having "had a shocker" on the issue, despite a number of political experts having warned little could have been done to sway Trump's views on protectionist tariffs and trade policy. Mr Rudd, who has his own "nasty" history with Trump, has vowed to push on and fight for Australian interests in a new America that is less friendly to its allies. "The America we're dealing with since the 20th of January, is a vastly different America from the past, and in fact, significantly different from the period of the first Trump administration," Mr Rudd told 7.30 in an exclusive interview.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50725
>>50771
>>50785
Australia's ambassador to the US, Kevin Rudd, details efforts to sway Donald Trump on steel and aluminium tariffs
Paul Johnson - 13 Mar 2025
1/2
Australia's ambassador to the United States Kevin Rudd has promised to put his "shoulder to the wheel" to secure better trade relations with a "hardline" US but warned negotiations with the second Trump administration will continue to be "rough".
The US on Wednesday refused to grant a tariff exemption to Australia on steel and aluminium imports to the United States, causing a political storm.
Prime Minister Anthony Albanese labelled the act "not the way to treat a friend" and "entirely unjustified".
Opposition Leader Peter Dutton accused Mr Albanese and former PM Mr Rudd of having "had a shocker" on the issue, despite a number of political experts having warned little could have been done to sway Trump's views on protectionist tariffs and trade policy.
His view on trade has been labelled mercantilist by former PM Malcolm Turnbull, while former Australian ambassadors Joe Hockey and Arthur Sinodinos have openly questioned Trump's understanding of how tariffs work and how they will impact the US.
Nonetheless Mr Rudd, who has his own "nasty" history with Trump, has vowed to push on and fight for Australian interests in a new America that is less friendly to its allies.
"The America we're dealing with since the 20th of January, is a vastly different America from the past, and in fact, significantly different from the period of the first Trump administration," Mr Rudd told 7.30 in an exclusive interview.
"This administration is more nationalist on questions of foreign policy, more protectionist on trade policy, and much more transactional in its overall approach to international negotiations.
"These are deep-seated, fundamental changes in this different America, which every one of the 36 countries who negotiated tariff exemptions on steel and aluminium last time round, back in 2017, have had to contend with this time round."
The man driving those negotiations from the US side is US Secretary of Commerce Howard Lutnick.
Mr Lutnick singled out Australia for criticism alongside Japan and China, in a scathing attack on alleged dumping of steel and aluminium early on Thursday morning AEDT.
"You've got dumpers in the rest of the world. Japan dumps steel, China dumps steel … we're going to stop that nonsense and bring steel here," Mr Lutnick told Fox Business.
"We're not going to stand for China dumping, Japan dumping … Australia does a lot of aluminium at below cost. I mean, this has got to end, and the president is on it, and he's protecting America."
Mr Rudd questioned those claims and said: "Australia only provides 1.5 per cent of total US imports of aluminium".
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50797
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22762109 (150413ZMAR25) Notable: PM steels for food fight after critical offer fails to win over Trump - The Albanese government will promise the nation’s farmers and food producers it will fight to protect them from Donald Trump’s next round of tariffs, as it offers the White House billions worth of co-operation on critical minerals to shield Australia from the escalating trade war. Trade Minister Don Farrell will pledge to protect Australia’s $75bn food export industry, including beef, wine and agriculture supplies to the US, amid fears an April 2 reciprocal tariffs announcement could deepen the trade spat, with meat and pharmaceuticals also in the firing line. “We’ve got your back. We will stand with you, shoulder to shoulder, to protect our trade interests - just like we did to resolve the trade issues with China,” Senator Farrell will tell The Australian and Visy Group’s 13th annual Global Food Forum in Melbourne on Friday. “The Albanese government has a strong track record on trade, and has shown that calm, persistent and quiet diplomacy pays off. We will be unrelenting in making our case to the US, and working tirelessly for Australia.” The Australian can reveal Kevin Rudd laid out the government’s critical minerals plan to Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick in multiple meetings ahead of Mr Trump’s tariff decision on Wednesday, and was encouraged by the response. It proposed a guaranteed supply chain of processed minerals and investment funds for new projects. “We were led to believe by Lutnick that this is what they wanted,” a senior government source said.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50725
>>50771
>>50785
PM steels for food fight after critical offer fails to win over Trump
BEN PACKHAM and PERRY WILLIAMS - March 14, 2025
1/2
The Albanese government will promise the nation’s farmers and food producers it will fight to protect them from Donald Trump’s next round of tariffs, as it offers the White House billions worth of co-operation on critical minerals to shield Australia from the escalating trade war.
Trade Minister Don Farrell will pledge to protect Australia’s $75bn food export industry, including beef, wine and agriculture supplies to the US, amid fears an April 2 reciprocal tariffs announcement could deepen the trade spat, with meat and pharmaceuticals also in the firing line.
“We’ve got your back. We will stand with you, shoulder to shoulder, to protect our trade interests – just like we did to resolve the trade issues with China,” Senator Farrell will tell The Australian and Visy Group’s 13th annual Global Food Forum in Melbourne on Friday.
“The Albanese government has a strong track record on trade, and has shown that calm, persistent and quiet diplomacy pays off. We will be unrelenting in making our case to the US, and working tirelessly for Australia.”
The Australian can reveal Kevin Rudd laid out the government’s critical minerals plan to Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick in multiple meetings ahead of Mr Trump’s tariff decision on Wednesday, and was encouraged by the response. It proposed a guaranteed supply chain of processed minerals and investment funds for new projects. “We were led to believe by Lutnick that this is what they wanted,” a senior government source said.
The proposal coincided with the President’s pressure campaign to get Ukraine to sign over its critical minerals resources, but it failed to save Australian steel and aluminium producers from his new 25 per cent tariffs.
“Australia was offering a comprehensive critical minerals package in exchange for tariff-free access to US markets. We were extremely disappointed that our generous offer was not accepted,” Senator Farrell said.
The package remains on the table and will be central to the nation’s case ahead of Mr Trump’s April 2 reciprocal tariffs announcement, which could hit an array of Australian products including medicines, beef, seafood and other food exports.
Senator Farrell will tell the Forum the Albanese government has not given up securing an exemption on steel and aluminium imposts, but “we can expect it will take some time”.
“Our government had worked tirelessly to secure an exemption. But it didn’t matter which country, which leader, or which minister was making their case. No one secured an exception – not a single country,” Senator Farrell will say. “The US will continue to buy our steel and aluminium, even if it means higher prices for their consumers and businesses.”
A day after Anthony Albanese blasted Mr Trump’s tariffs as “unjustified” and unfriendly, the government rejected claims by Mr Lutnick that Australia was a “dumper” of cut-price aluminium.
“You’ve got dumpers in the rest of the world. Japan dumps steel, China dumps steel … we’re going to stop that nonsense and bring steel here,” Mr Lutnick told Fox Business.
“We’re not going to stand for China dumping, Japan dumping … Australia does a lot of aluminium at below cost. I mean, this has got to end, and the President is on it, and he’s protecting America.”
Australian aluminium producers have been shielded from rising energy prices and been promised $2bn by Labor to switch to renewable electricity. But a government spokeswoman said Australia “does not provide subsidies directly to the aluminium sector”, and there had been no complaints about dumped aluminium aired by US industry.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50798
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22762169 (150437ZMAR25) Notable: Video: Bill Shorten says Australia should ‘fight back’ against Trump tariffs - Former senior minister Bill Shorten has waded back into the political discourse, urging Australia to “push back” against Donald Trump’s call to hit Australian steel and aluminium imports with 25 per cent tariffs. While the government will continue negotiating an exemption for Australia, it has ruled out retaliatory tariffs which it argues would hit Australian businesses harder. However Mr Shorten, who officially resigned from parliament in January to become University of Canberra’s vice chancellor, said Australia needed to “consider putting everything on the table to fight back”. He said the aggressive action was needed due to the potential of future tariffs on new sectors, like the beef industry, with Australia’s US exports totalling about $16.5bn. “I worry about the next sector and the next sector … At some stage we have to have to send a message to President Trump that if you do something to us, we’ll do it back,” he told Sunrise. “Australia might be a bit smaller than America, but we’re not a soft mark and we need to consider putting everything on the table to fight back.” Although Mr Shorten said the government, and Australia’s US Ambassador Kevin Rudd has been “doing a good job,” he said the US needs to know Australia “means business”. “I think all reasonable Australians will say at a certain point: ‘You push us, we push you.’ It’s as simple as that,” he said.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50725
>>50771
>>50785
Bill Shorten says Australia should ‘fight back’ against Trump tariffs
Bill Shorten has called for Australia to push back on Donald Trump’s tariffs, and while “tempting”, the Trade Minister said he had another plan.
Jessica Lang - March 14, 2025
1/2
Former senior minister Bill Shorten has waded back into the political discourse, urging Australia to “push back” against Donald Trump’s call to hit Australian steel and aluminium imports with 25 per cent tariffs.
While the government will continue negotiating an exemption for Australia, it has ruled out retaliatory tariffs which it argues would hit Australian businesses harder.
However Mr Shorten, who officially resigned from parliament in January to become University of Canberra’s vice chancellor, said Australia needed to “consider putting everything on the table to fight back”.
He said the aggressive action was needed due to the potential of future tariffs on new sectors, like the beef industry, with Australia’s US exports totalling about $16.5bn.
“I worry about the next sector and the next sector … At some stage we have to have to send a message to President Trump that if you do something to us, we’ll do it back,” he told Sunrise.
“Australia might be a bit smaller than America, but we’re not a soft mark and we need to consider putting everything on the table to fight back.”
Although Mr Shorten said the government, and Australia’s US Ambassador Kevin Rudd has been “doing a good job,” he said the US needs to know Australia “means business”.
“I think all reasonable Australians will say at a certain point: ‘You push us, we push you.’ It’s as simple as that,” he said.
“We mean business. We care about our jobs, as much as you care about your jobs, as much as you care about your jobs.
“Far better to stick to your agreement, stick to the road rules but if people don’t want to play by the rules, you gotta stand up and be counted.”
Speaking to The Australian’s Global Food Forum on Friday, Trade Minister Don Farrell said he would continue to employ “calm, considered diplomacy to resolve all of our trade issues with the United States.
He said while retaliatory tariffs were “tempting,” he said it would go against Australia’s support of free trading.
Notably, Australia also refrained from imposing tariffs after Beijing hit producers hard with high tariffs totalling $20bn on lucrative imports like barley, rock lobster, beef and wine.
Senator Farrell said this was proof “calm, persistent and quiet diplomacy pays off”, with the minister set to speak to his US counterpart Howard Lutnick on Monday (or Tuesday Australian time).
“Our approach working closely with industry has seen the return of every single product into China,” he said.
“We’re also focused on opening new markets for Australian businesses producers and farmers,” he added flagging more deals with the United Arab Emirates, which he described as the “Woolies warehouse of the Middle East”.
While Australia was granted exemptions in 2017, alongside other countries including Argentina and Brazil, Mr Trump’s second round of levies have been sweeping.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50799
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22762217 (150453ZMAR25) Notable: Australia offered Trump critical minerals. This is how he sold us fool’s gold - It’s a lesson Australian diplomats in America learn quickly. Washington DC is no place for subtlety. You need to lay it on thick. So US ambassador Kevin Rudd was effusive late last month as he spoke at a superannuation conference at the Australian embassy on Massachusetts Avenue. Rudd, a prodigious networker, was on a mission to cultivate the man Australian officials had identified as their best hope of influencing Donald Trump’s trade agenda, second only to the president himself, of course. “This is a really important appointment for America and for the world,” Rudd enthused as he introduced Trump’s commerce secretary, Howard Lutnick, to the audience. “Here in this embassy you are among friends. We regard the United States as friend, partner and ally for more than 100, 150 years.” But from the very beginning there were ominous signs. A proclamation issued by the White House named and shamed Australia for surging its aluminium exports to the US in recent years, despite the Biden administration asking for more shipments to make up for sanctioned Russian supplies. “Australia has disregarded its verbal commitment to voluntarily restrain its aluminum exports to a reasonable level,” the proclamation said, a reference to a 2019 meeting between Morrison government ministers and US officials. Team Australia’s charm offensive had failed. Lutnick repaid Rudd’s efforts by going on Fox News on Thursday and singling out Australia for dumping cheap metals on the US, a remarkable claim given Australia accounts for just 2 per cent of American steel and aluminium imports. So much for being friends.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50725
>>50771
>>50785
Australia offered Trump critical minerals. This is how he sold us fool’s gold
Matthew Knott - March 14, 2025
1/3
It’s a lesson Australian diplomats in America learn quickly. Washington DC is no place for subtlety. You need to lay it on thick.
So US ambassador Kevin Rudd was effusive late last month as he spoke at a superannuation conference at the Australian embassy on Massachusetts Avenue.
Rudd, a prodigious networker, was on a mission to cultivate the man Australian officials had identified as their best hope of influencing Donald Trump’s trade agenda, second only to the president himself, of course.
“This is a really important appointment for America and for the world,” Rudd enthused as he introduced Trump’s commerce secretary, Howard Lutnick, to the audience. “Here in this embassy you are among friends. We regard the United States as friend, partner and ally for more than 100, 150 years.”
Rudd later made sure to tag Lutnick in a post about the event on X, the social media platform owned by Trump’s favourite tech bro, Elon Musk. Lutnick – a New York billionaire and long-time friend of Trump – had been confirmed by the US Senate the previous week.
The superannuation event, which Treasurer Jim Chalmers also attended, came at the midpoint of the government’s month-long campaign to secure an exemption to Trump’s 25 per cent steel and aluminium tariffs.
Trump set off the countdown clock on February 11 when he officially unveiled his tariff plan. Knowing such an announcement was coming, Australian officials lined up a leader-to-leader phone call that day. Albanese had called Trump to congratulate him on his election victory, but this would be their first substantial conversation.
The 40-minute call went swimmingly. Or so it seemed at the time. Albanese secured an agreement from Trump that he would consider a tariff exemption for Australia and say so publicly. The leaders agreed on the exact wording so that they would be in sync. No other country received a similar commitment.
As he signed his executive order on tariffs later that day, Trump delivered a typical performance. On the one hand, he declared there would be “no exceptions” to the tariffs when they came into effect on March 12. On the other, he described Albanese as a “fine man” and said he would give “great consideration” to Australia’s request for an exemption. Albanese was delighted to see Trump parrot his talking points about America’s rare trade surplus with Australia.
This was perceived as a political win for Albanese at the time, seemingly demolishing opposition claims that he would struggle to deal with Trump. But senior figures in the government would later rue Trump’s promise, arguing that he had raised unrealistic expectations of a carve-out for Australia and set Albanese up to fail. Rather than a gift, it was a curse in disguise.
“If the Americans had simply said, ‘Don’t waste your time, nobody is going to get an exemption’, we wouldn’t have wasted a whole month on this,” an exasperated senior government figure says.
The suspense – will Trump spare Australia or won’t he? – helped the tariff decision develop a symbolic status well beyond its limited economic impact. The Coalition made it clear that it would brand the government as a failure if it did not secure an exemption, given the Turnbull government had won a carve-out in 2018.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50800
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22762619 (150944ZMAR25) Notable: Trump administration accused of ‘blatant foreign interference’ in Australian universities over questionnaire on DEI and gender - The Trump administration has been accused of “blatant foreign interference” in Australia’s universities after researchers who receive US funding were asked to confirm they aligned with US government interests, including only recognising two genders. The questionnaire, sent to university researchers over the past fortnight, seeks a response within 48 hours to more than 30 questions to support “program determinations”, according to a copy of the questionnaire seen by Guardian Australia. The questions relate to the priorities of the Trump administration, including whether the organisation receives funding from China, whether there are DEI elements, and whether the project is taking “appropriate measures” to defend against “gender ideology” in line with Trump’s executive order on gender. The questionnaires were distributed by various federal agencies on behalf of an executive memo from the office of the president, requiring them to identify all funding was consistent with “policies and requirements”. Separately, six sandstone universities represented by the Group of Eight have already had research grants suspended or terminated in line with changes introduced by the Trump administration, according to the Go8. Researchers were notified shortly after the US election that the projects, which spanned a range of topics from agriculture to foreign aid and diversity and equity, had been cancelled under higher education cuts, pending a review. The Go8 has sought Australian government intervention and last week wrote to the chair of the US House Committee on Science, Space and Technology, Brian Babin, for guidance and an extension of time to respond to the requirements. The questionnaire seeks to confirm university projects don’t work with “any party that espouses anti-American beliefs”, or whether they have received “ANY funding from the PRC”, including Confucius Institutes and Chinese state or non-state actors.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50785
Trump administration accused of ‘blatant foreign interference’ in Australian universities over questionnaire on DEI and gender
Researchers told to respond within 48 hours to more than 30 questions, including on DEI, gender and climate
Caitlin Cassidy - 14 Mar 2025
1/2
The Trump administration has been accused of “blatant foreign interference” in Australia’s universities after researchers who receive US funding were asked to confirm they aligned with US government interests, including only recognising two genders.
The questionnaire, sent to university researchers over the past fortnight, seeks a response within 48 hours to more than 30 questions to support “program determinations”, according to a copy of the questionnaire seen by Guardian Australia. The questions relate to the priorities of the Trump administration, including whether the organisation receives funding from China, whether there are DEI elements, and whether the project is taking “appropriate measures” to defend against “gender ideology” in line with Trump’s executive order on gender.
The questionnaires were distributed by various federal agencies on behalf of an executive memo from the office of the president, requiring them to identify all funding was consistent with “policies and requirements”.
Separately, six sandstone universities represented by the Group of Eight have already had research grants suspended or terminated in line with changes introduced by the Trump administration, according to the Go8. Researchers were notified shortly after the US election that the projects, which spanned a range of topics from agriculture to foreign aid and diversity and equity, had been cancelled under higher education cuts, pending a review.
The chief executive of the Go8, Vicki Thomson, said the body was “extremely concerned” about the implications of the Trump administration’s policy, particularly for health and medical research and defence collaboration.
“Go8 universities are deeply engaged in collaborative activities with the US, especially through our defence initiatives and the AUKUS alliance,” she said.
“For every one of our members, the US is the largest research partner by far.”
The Go8 has sought Australian government intervention and last week wrote to the chair of the US House Committee on Science, Space and Technology, Brian Babin, for guidance and an extension of time to respond to the requirements.
The questionnaire seeks to confirm university projects don’t work with “any party that espouses anti-American beliefs”, or whether they have received “ANY funding from the PRC”, including Confucius Institutes and Chinese state or non-state actors.
It also asks whether research is a “no DEI project” or a “climate or ‘environmental justice’ project”, as well as ensuring it takes “appropriate measures to protect women and to defend against gender ideology” and combats “Christian prosecution”.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50801
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22767921 (160819ZMAR25) Notable: Video: Anthony Albanese says it is in 'Australia's national interest' to back Ukraine following virtual world leader summit - Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has said it is in "Australia's national interest" to stand with Ukraine following a virtual meeting with other world leaders designed to drum up support for ceasefire discussions. Mr Albanese joined a call with European and Commonwealth allies on Saturday night, hosted by UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer. Sir Keir urged the 25 world leaders, including Mr Albanese, to sign up to a "coalition of the willing" to protect Ukraine and increase pressure on Russia to accept a ceasefire. Britain and France both say they would be willing to send peacekeepers to Ukraine in the event of a ceasefire, while Mr Albanese has said his government is open to requests. But speaking to journalists on Sunday, the prime minister noted that any peacekeeping arrangement could not happen until Russia agreed to a ceasefire, because "you need peace to have a peacekeeping force". Asked about what that could look like, Mr Albanese said Australia would only provide a "small contribution" if a decision to send troops was made. "Australia stands with Ukraine, and we will continue to do so for as long as it takes," he said following the meeting. Opposition Deputy Leader Sussan Ley on Sunday reiterated the Coalition's stance that while it would stand with Ukraine "against the illegal and immortal invasion", peacekeeping forces on the ground were better handled by Europe.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50731
>>50765
>>50795
Anthony Albanese says it is in 'Australia's national interest' to back Ukraine following virtual world leader summit
Daniela Pizzirani - 15 March 2025
Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has said it is in "Australia's national interest" to stand with Ukraine following a virtual meeting with other world leaders designed to drum up support for ceasefire discussions.
Mr Albanese joined a call with European and Commonwealth allies on Saturday night, hosted by UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer.
Sir Keir urged the 25 world leaders, including Mr Albanese, to sign up to a "coalition of the willing" to protect Ukraine and increase pressure on Russia to accept a ceasefire.
Britain and France both say they would be willing to send peacekeepers to Ukraine in the event of a ceasefire, while Mr Albanese has said his government is open to requests.
But speaking to journalists on Sunday, the prime minister noted that any peacekeeping arrangement could not happen until Russia agreed to a ceasefire, because "you need peace to have a peacekeeping force".
Asked about what that could look like, Mr Albanese said Australia would only provide a "small contribution" if a decision to send troops was made.
"Australia stands with Ukraine, and we will continue to do so for as long as it takes," he said following the meeting.
Mr Albanese said Russian President Vladimir Putin's regime has "imperialist designs for Ukraine and beyond", labelling the conflict "a struggle for the international rule of law".
"We must ensure Russia's illegal and immoral actions are not rewarded through any peace process," Mr Albanese added.
Opposition Deputy Leader Sussan Ley on Sunday reiterated the Coalition's stance that while it would stand with Ukraine "against the illegal and immortal invasion", peacekeeping forces on the ground were better handled by Europe.
Meanwhile, Greens leader Adam Bandt told ABC's Insiders that while it was the party's preference not to put Australian troops in harm's way, it would ultimately depend on the request that was made and what peace agreement had been struck.
UK pushes for peace deal
Sir Keir told leaders at the summit that Mr Putin will "sooner or later" have to "come to the table".
"But, and this is a big but, for us this morning in our meeting, we can't sit back and simply wait for that to happen," he said.
"We have to keep pushing ahead, pushing forward, and preparing for peace — and a peace that will be secure and that will last."
He said the countries' defence chiefs were set to meet in the UK this coming Thursday to firm up "robust plans" to support Ukraine in the event of a ceasefire.
"President Trump has offered Putin the way forward to a lasting peace. Now we must make this a reality," he said.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50802
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22768009 (160855ZMAR25) Notable: Australia pushes for Trump tariff ‘offer he can’t refuse’ - Trade Minister Don Farrell has flagged a fresh offer to US President Donald Trump that “he can’t refuse” as he launches new round of talks to reverse last week’s tariff hit and warns Americans about more expensive hamburgers if duties were placed on Australian beef. The 25 per cent US charge on Australian metals has turned the US-Australia relationship into a key focus for the election to be held in May. The opposition on Sunday said Prime Minister Anthony Albanese was inept for failing to secure a call with Trump leading up to the tariff call. Government ministers are bracing for possible tariffs on products such as beef or wine, and Farrell on Sunday said he would speak to US trade ambassador Jamieson Greer on Monday after talking to commerce secretary Howard Lutnick on Friday. “What we need to do is find out what it is that the Americans want in terms of this relationship between Australia and the United States and then make President Trump an offer he can’t refuse,” Farrell said. An offer to provide greater access to Australian critical minerals had been rejected by the US, he said, casting doubt over the prospects of any future deal.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50725
>>50771
>>50785
Australia pushes for Trump tariff ‘offer he can’t refuse’
Paul Sakkal - March 16, 2025
Trade Minister Don Farrell has flagged a fresh offer to US President Donald Trump that “he can’t refuse” as he launches new round of talks to reverse last week’s tariff hit and warns Americans about more expensive hamburgers if duties were placed on Australian beef.
The 25 per cent US charge on Australian metals has turned the US-Australia relationship into a key focus for the election to be held in May. The opposition on Sunday said Prime Minister Anthony Albanese was inept for failing to secure a call with Trump leading up to the tariff call.
Government ministers are bracing for possible tariffs on products such as beef or wine, and Farrell on Sunday said he would speak to US trade ambassador Jamieson Greer on Monday after talking to commerce secretary Howard Lutnick on Friday.
“What we need to do is find out what it is that the Americans want in terms of this relationship between Australia and the United States and then make President Trump an offer he can’t refuse,” Farrell said. An offer to provide greater access to Australian critical minerals had been rejected by the US, he said, casting doubt over the prospects of any future deal.
Jostling over Labor’s handling of the export strike sits alongside a partisan divide on whether Australia should send peacekeepers to Ukraine alongside Britain and other European democracies.
Dutton has rejected the idea of sending troops, prompting Albanese to claim on Sunday it was “not clear who Peter Dutton stands with or what he stands for”, suggesting the opposition leader was failing to side strongly with Ukraine after Trump’s feud with Ukrainian leader Volodymyr Zelensky.
The opposition is using the tariff decision to further its argument that the prime minister lacked strength, while Labor ministers are keen to project an image of steady-handedness and unity with other Western democracies being targeted by the US trade war.
Albanese left a fundraiser at Visy boss Anthony Pratt’s Melbourne mansion on Saturday night to join a call with European leaders and those of Canada and New Zealand on the prospect of joining a “coalition of the willing” peacekeeping force. Dutton pulled out of the Pratt event.
“Australia stands with Ukraine. We understand that this is an issue not just of a sovereign nation being invaded illegally with an act of brutal aggression from Russia, that Vladimir Putin has imperialist designs, not just on Ukraine, but on the region,” the prime minister told reporters in Melbourne on Sunday.
Deputy Liberal leader Sussan Ley on Sky News said she believed any peacekeeping mission in Ukraine, which would occur only if a ceasefire was reached, was a matter that was “better handled by Europe”.
“This is a government that couldn’t even get a shipload of coal to Ukraine to keep them warm during winter. This is a government that cut up helicopters and buried them in the ground instead of sending them to Ukraine,” she said.
The dispute with the US, and the prospect of additional trade strikes, is likely to run into the Australian election campaign as Trump’s protectionist officials continue to review US trade relationships.
Farrell said an Australian offer to give the US greater access to Australia’s plentiful critical minerals had been rejected.
“The offer to the Americans was, ‘we’ll work with you. You want these critical minerals, you want them for electric batteries in cars, you’ve mentioned some of the other things, mobile phones’,” he said.
“But the process of extraction is expensive, we need capital. It’s not about cheaper prices; it’s not about preferred access. It’s about ensuring that they’ve got a reliable supply chain to ensure that when they need these critical minerals, you’ve got a reliable country like Australia.“
Farrell, speaking on Sky News, said his conversation with Lutnick on Friday “wasn’t a pessimistic one” but that he had given no assurances about relief for Australia.
Flagging trade diversification with India, Farrell trumpeted Labor’s record of removing Chinese trade barriers and he countered Dutton’s criticism of Labor’s handling of the US dispute by saying the Coalition leader “couldn’t go two rounds with a revolving door”.
“I wish I could tell you exactly what the American government is finally going to do. To be honest with you, I suspect they don’t even know themselves right now,” Farrell said.
“The significance … of our beef exports is that most of it goes into McDonald’s hamburgers. And if you push up the price of those beef exports by 25 per cent or 10 per cent or whatever the figure is, then you simply push up the price of hamburgers in the United States. It doesn’t make any sense.”
https://www.theage.com.au/politics/federal/australia-pushes-for-trump-tariff-offer-he-can-t-refuse-20250316-p5ljxk.html
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50803
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22773374 (170952ZMAR25) Notable: Warm welcome to country or Macquarie University students fail - Law students at Macquarie University face the threat of failing a key exam if they perform an underwhelming acknowledgement of country or refuse to acknowledge traditional Aboriginal owners at all, in a move labelled “indoctrination” by Indigenous leaders. The presentation is worth 30 per cent of the final course mark and students have been told the acknowledgement of country is one of the key five marking areas. The demand to perform a “thoughtful”, “culturally respectful” and “exceptionally well-written” ode to Aboriginal traditional owners at the start of an oral law exam is despite the course on “age and the law” having no direct relation to Indigenous matters. Longstanding academic and founding chief executive of the Ramsay Centre for Western Civilisation Simon Haines described assessing a compulsory acknowledgement of country as “dangerous”. “The critical error here is the confusion of categories - the academic and the political activist,” Professor Haines said. “Wherever you may stand on acknowledgement of country etc, the fact is that being obliged to make an acknowledgment statement as an assessable element in an academic process is basically shocking. Social justice activist projects should not be confused with an academic assessment project. And that’s what’s happening here.”
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>>/qresearch/22482279 (pb)
>>50714
Warm welcome to country or Macquarie University students fail
JANET ALBRECHTSEN and NOAH YIM - 16 March 2025
1/2
Law students at Macquarie University face the threat of failing a key exam if they perform an underwhelming acknowledgement of country or refuse to acknowledge traditional Aboriginal owners at all, in a move labelled “indoctrination” by Indigenous leaders.
The presentation is worth 30 per cent of the final course mark and students have been told the acknowledgement of country is one of the key five marking areas. The demand to perform a “thoughtful”, “culturally respectful” and “exceptionally well-written” ode to Aboriginal traditional owners at the start of an oral law exam is despite the course on “age and the law” having no direct relation to Indigenous matters.
Longstanding academic and founding chief executive of the Ramsay Centre for Western Civilisation Simon Haines described assessing a compulsory acknowledgement of country as “dangerous”.
“The critical error here is the confusion of categories – the academic and the political activist,” Professor Haines said.
“Wherever you may stand on acknowledgement of country etc, the fact is that being obliged to make an acknowledgment statement as an assessable element in an academic process is basically shocking. Social justice activist projects should not be confused with an academic assessment project. And that’s what’s happening here.”
Professor Haines, an academic for more than 30 years, called on the university’s vice-chancellor, Bruce Dowton, to review it.
“I actually think the VC (of Macquarie University) should review this,” he said.
“It’s his job. If I was running a university, I would call them in and basically say you just can’t do this. It’s an academic process, not a political one.”
He said tertiary administrators were becoming too detached from the mainstream to notice the problem with the welcome to country test. “The metaphor that I use is it’s a bit like an ice flow that’s broken away from the mainland. The entire sector has shifted so far in this activist direction that they don’t even realise how far they’ve got from popular community opinion. This kind of thing is why universities are on the nose more than they even realise or acknowledge,” he said.
Conservative Indigenous leaders have criticised Macquarie University for the assessment. Opposition Indigenous Australians spokeswoman Jacinta Nampijinpa Price said it showed universities were “more interested in indoctrination than genuine education”. Warren Mundine said he was “flabbergasted” and called it “pure indoctrination by a group of fanaticists”.
This latest controversy at Macquarie University follows 18 months of intense scrutiny on its anti-Israel academic Randa Abdel-Fattah. Her taxpayer-funded $870,000 research funding was recently suspended after she bragged about bending research rules.
University management conceded she had made “anti-Semitic” statements during the last 18 months but said it could not take disciplinary action.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50804
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22773412 (171016ZMAR25) Notable: Marine Rotation Force - Darwin 2025:Colonel Jason Armas to command US Marine force flying to Darwin, Australia- Despite growing uncertainty surrounding trade relations under the Trump administration, Australia’s military relationship with Washington D.C. will remain unchanged in the Top End, with a 2500 strong US Marine force flying into Darwin. On Monday, the first batch of Marine Rotation Force - Darwin touch down, followed by further sub-units in the following weeks. It is understood the US visitors will be commanded by Colonel Jason Armas, who has almost 25 years of military experience under his belt. A graduate of the US Naval Academy in 2001, Colonel Armas deployed multiple times to Iraq and Afghanistan during the war on terror. However, Colonel Armas’ experience is not limited to the Middle East, with the senior commander having also undertaken various assignments in the Indo-Pacific region, including Japan and the Philippines. The latest MRF-D cohort are expected to have a busy season under Colonel Armas’ leadership, with the ADF having scheduled trilateral exercise Talisman Sabre for July. As such, MRF-D will have a short window to both acclimatise and familiarise themselves with their Australian counterparts before embarking upon one of the world’s largest military training exercises, which will consist of almost 20 foreign military forces.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Colonel Jason Armas to command US Marine force flying to Darwin, Australia
Harry Brill - March 16, 2025
Despite growing uncertainty surrounding trade relations under the Trump administration, Australia’s military relationship with Washington D.C. will remain unchanged in the Top End, with a 2500 strong US Marine force flying into Darwin.
On Monday, the first batch of Marine Rotation Force – Darwin touch down, followed by further sub-units in the following weeks.
It is understood the US visitors will be commanded by Colonel Jason Armas, who has almost 25 years of military experience under his belt.
A graduate of the US Naval Academy in 2001, Colonel Armas deployed multiple times to Iraq and Afghanistan during the war on terror.
However, Colonel Armas’ experience is not limited to the Middle East, with the senior commander having also undertaken various assignments in the Indo-Pacific region, including Japan and the Philippines.
The latest MRF-D cohort are expected to have a busy season under Colonel Armas’ leadership, with the ADF having scheduled trilateral exercise Talisman Sabre for July.
As such, MRF-D will have a short window to both acclimatise and familiarise themselves with their Australian counterparts before embarking upon one of the world’s largest military training exercises, which will consist of almost 20 foreign military forces.
The fresh wave of US military presence follows several Washington D.C.-led inquiries concerning the Northern Territory, with a logistics team having inspected supply-chain facilities at RAAF Base Darwin, as well bases in North Queensland and Western Australia just last month.
The logistics team’s examination of key sites was followed by a week-long defence industry mission in Honolulu, Hawaii, this month, in which more than 20 US military contractors and senior officers discussed the Territory’s ability to support US military projects.
It is understood an NT delegation, led by DefenceNT, are yet to debrief Chief Minister Lia Finocchiaro on the mission’s findings.
https://www.ntnews.com.au/news/colonel-jason-armas-to-command-us-marine-force-flying-to-darwin-australia/news-story/bb5834bd56f0e82fc6be7b1f72c99ea1
https://www.1stmardiv.marines.mil/Leaders/Biography/Article/3850350/col-jc-armas/
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50805
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22773415 (171019ZMAR25) Notable: US Marine commander Colonel Jason Armas tells of 17 task force military exercises during stay - A senior US commander says the Marine Corps shares a “critical” relationship with the Australian Defence Force, maintaining the two services will work “hand-in-hand” in a jam-packed year. At RAAF Base Darwin on Monday, Marine Rotation Force - Commander Colonel Jason Armas and the first batch of his 2500-strong force were seen passing through customs to retrieve their M4 carbines. In his first press conference since setting food in Australia, Colonel Armas told the media his Marines looked forward to the “hitting the ground running” in Darwin. “We look forward to the incredible opportunities that we’re going to have to continue to strengthen our relationship with the ADF throughout our time here, and we look forward to the opportunities that are not just local, but also abroad,” he said. “We already have an amazing relationship, and we look forward to continuing to advance that.” It is understood MRF-D will participate in a whopping 17 military exercises in the space of six months, which includes some activities in South-East Asia.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50804
US Marine commander Colonel Jason Armas tells of 17 task force military exercises during stay
In a press conference featuring China, the Indo-Pacific, and whispers of a larger US military presence, Colonel Jason Armas says his Marines will be “hitting the ground running” in Darwin, with a whopping 17 training exercises awaiting them over the next six months.
Harry Brill - March 17, 2025
A senior US commander says the Marine Corps shares a “critical” relationship with the Australian Defence Force, maintaining the two services will work “hand-in-hand” in a jam-packed year.
At RAAF Base Darwin on Monday, Marine Rotation Force – Commander Colonel Jason Armas and the first batch of his 2500-strong force were seen passing through customs to retrieve their M4 carbines.
In his first press conference since setting food in Australia, Colonel Armas told the media his Marines looked forward to the “hitting the ground running” in Darwin.
“We look forward to the incredible opportunities that we’re going to have to continue to strengthen our relationship with the ADF throughout our time here, and we look forward to the opportunities that are not just local, but also abroad,” he said.
“We already have an amazing relationship, and we look forward to continuing to advance that.”
It is understood MRF-D will participate in a whopping 17 military exercises in the space of six months, which includes some activities in South-East Asia.
Despite suggestions in Canberra of a possible US Marine build-up in northern Australia, Colonel Armas said he would lead the rotation with a force composition similar to previous iterations.
“We work hand-in-hand with the ADF to see what they would like to train on to ensure we’re meeting requirements set forth by both (services),” he said.
“But since 2011 when the rotation force was announced it has grown in size, but we are very similar in form, size and capability as we have seen for the pass three iterations.”
Asked if the importance of the latest Marine rotation was elevated by the rise of China and Indo-Pacific tensions, Colonel Armas said it would not be appropriate “for me to speak on national security policy”.
“Each (MRF-D rotation) has gotten a little bit different, a little bit more advanced and that is working side-by-side with our Australian partners and fulfilling the requirements that are set forth in our agreement,” he said.
“Is any one (rotation) more important than the other? I would say that these are pre-planned and we plan on continuing them moving forward.”
However, Colonel Armas did reveal his view on ADF-US Marine relations.
“I would say that our relationship between the US Marine Corps and the ADF is incredibly important – I’d say it’s critical,” he said.
“I can’t really speak to the higher aspects of it, but from my aspect here, as the commanding officer of MRF-D, I think it’s part and parcel of who we are.
“I think we can’t go forward, or we can’t continue to train and work our interoperability without them.”
Interstate, Defence Minister Richard Marles said the arrival of the latest wave of US Marines demonstrated “shared dedication” to the region.
“The power of our Alliance with the United States is a testament to our shared dedication to fostering a secure, stable, and inclusive Indo-Pacific,” he said.
“Past rotations have shown us the value of improving the capability and interoperability of our defence forces through joint exercises and activities, and in 2025, we’re excited to continue building on this momentum.”
https://www.ntnews.com.au/news/us-marine-commander-colonel-jason-armas-tells-of-17-task-force-military-exercises-during-stay/news-story/f82cd976aa8bc01e9c9568a4ce676b05
https://www.dvidshub.net/image/8918982/us-marines-sailors-with-mrf-d-253-arrive-northern-territory-australia
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50806
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22786689 (190828ZMAR25) Notable: Bankstown Hospital nurses face court over ‘kill Israelis’ rant, one pleading not guilty - Dramatic scenes have unfolded outside a Sydney court as two former nurses charged over an anti-Semitic video appeared, with the lawyer of one of the accused saying his client will plead not guilty and will be arguing to have the video at the heart of the case excluded from proceedings. Sarah Abu Lebdeh and her colleague Ahmad Rashad Nadir, former Bankstown Hospital nurses, faced court for the first time since they went global for their alleged anti-Semitic diatribe filmed during a night shift in the break room of their ward. They appeared at Downing Centre Local Court briefly on Wednesday morning over the rant that saw both immediately stood down from their positions after the footage was released by Israeli social media influencer Max Veifer. As Ms Abu Lebdeh arrived, a group of hooded and bearded men dressed in black shielded her from the media scrum on all sides as she walked into the courthouse. Ms Abu Lebdeh is facing three commonwealth charges after claiming she would “kill” Israeli patients. The 26-year-old was charged earlier this month with threatening violence to a group, using a carriage service to threaten to kill and using a carriage service to menace/harass/offend. Mr Nadir, 27, has been charged with the commonwealth offence of use carriage service to menace/harass/offend and a state charge of possess prohibited drug, after his locker was allegedly found with a vial of morphine. Mr Nadir’s lawyer Mohamad Sakr told reporters outside court his client would be pleading not guilty and he intends “to argue for the video to be excluded from court”, citing “legal and technical grounds”. Mr Sakr alleges the video was captured “without the consent and knowledge” of his client.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50719
>>50746
Bankstown Hospital nurses face court over ‘kill Israelis’ rant, one pleading not guilty
LIAM MENDES - 19 March 2025
Dramatic scenes have unfolded outside a Sydney court as two former nurses charged over an anti-Semitic video appeared, with the lawyer of one of the accused saying his client will plead not guilty and will be arguing to have the video at the heart of the case excluded from proceedings.
Sarah Abu Lebdeh and her colleague Ahmad Rashad Nadir, former Bankstown Hospital nurses, faced court for the first time since they went global for their alleged anti-Semitic diatribe filmed during a night shift in the break room of their ward.
They appeared at Downing Centre Local Court briefly on Wednesday morning over the rant that saw both immediately stood down from their positions after the footage was released by Israeli social media influencer Max Veifer.
As Ms Abu Lebdeh arrived, a group of hooded and bearded men dressed in black shielded her from the media scrum on all sides as she walked into the courthouse.
Ms Abu Lebdeh is facing three commonwealth charges after claiming she would “kill” Israeli patients.
The 26-year-old was charged earlier this month with threatening violence to a group, using a carriage service to threaten to kill and using a carriage service to menace/harass/offend.
Mr Nadir, 27, has been charged with the commonwealth offence of use carriage service to menace/harass/offend and a state charge of possess prohibited drug, after his locker was allegedly found with a vial of morphine.
Mr Nadir’s lawyer Mohamad Sakr told reporters outside court his client would be pleading not guilty and he intends “to argue for the video to be excluded from court”, citing “legal and technical grounds”.
Mr Sakr alleges the video was captured “without the consent and knowledge” of his client.
Appearing before magistrate Jennifer Atkinson, the pair had their matters adjourned to May 13. They have been excused from appearing in person.
Ms Lebdeh nor her lawyer did not speak outside the court.
In the video, Mr Nadir allegedly told Mr Veifer he “had no idea” the number of Israelis who had attended Bankstown Hospital who he had sent to “hell”.
Ms Abu Lebdeh allegedly said she would not treat Israeli patients but “kill them”, telling Mr Veifer he would “die the most disgusting death”.
At the time of the release, in mid February, NSW Health Minister Ryan Park said the “deranged” nurses would never work in the department again while Health secretary Susan Pearce, in tears, said the comments were “appalling on every level”.
The duo were also deregistered by the Nursing and Midwifery Council of NSW, effective from February 13.
Mr Nadir became an Australian citizen in 2020 after having fled Afghanistan as a 12-year-old boy.
When The Australian approached the two nurses at their Western Sydney homes in February, Mr Nadir said he planned to publicly apologise to the “Jewish community and anyone I’ve offended”, but first he needed to speak with police. He has not spoken since.
Ms Abu Lebdeh’s family said the nurse was “sorry” and had suffered an “extreme panic attack”.
Her apology, via a man claiming to be her uncle, came only after other family members abused a reporter from The Australian and snatched away his phone.
In the viral video Mr Nadir also allegedly said: “You (Mr Veifer) have no idea how many (Israeli people) come to this hospital … I send to Jahannam”, the Arabic translation for “hell”.
Ms Abu Lebdeh allegedly told the influencer: “It (Israel) is Palestine’s country, not your country you piece of shit.
“One day your time will come. One day you’ll die the most …”
She went on to say “when your time comes, I want you to remember my face so you can understand that you will die the most disgusting death”.
Asked what would happen if an Israeli patient came into the hospital, Ms Abu Lebdeh said: “I won’t treat them, I will kill them.”
Mr Nadir said that while Mr Veifer had “beautiful eyes”, he was going to “get killed” and go to “hell”. “Those pretty eyes should stay in this world for longer,” said the man, who described himself in the footage as a “doctor”, which, given he’s a nurse, may also constitute an offence.
The incident took place on chat forum Chatruletka, a web platform that allows users across the world to randomly connect via video and audio with others.
https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/bankstown-hospital-nurses-to-face-court-over-kill-israelis-rant/news-story/abc110341046ab755d87e4f1e0c4931a
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50807
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22786699 (190839ZMAR25) Notable: Video: NSW nurses who allegedly threatened Israeli patients appear in court - Two nurses charged over a video which allegedly included threats to Israeli patients have appeared in a Sydney court. Ahmad Rashad Nadir, 27 and Sarah Abu Lebdeh, 26, were charged late last month and early this month over the video, which was a recorded online conversation from cam chat app Chatruletka. In the video, the pair speak to Israeli content creator Max Veifer, who had initially shared an edited version of the conversation. The nurses, from Bankstown Hospital, allegedly bragged about refusing to treat Israeli patients, killing them and saying they would go to hell. Ms Abu Lebdeh was charged with three Commonwealth offences - threatening violence to a group, using a carriage service to threaten to kill, and using a carriage service to menace, harass or offend. Mr Nadir was charged with using a carriage service to menace, harass or offend and possessing a prohibited drug. According to court documents, Ms Abu Lebdeh's alleged offence of threatening violence to a group relates to "Israeli people, and a reasonable member of that group would fear that the threat will be carried out". Mr Nadir's drug charge relates to his alleged possession of morphine. In a packed courtroom at the Downing Centre, where there was standing room only, both cases were adjourned to May 13. Outside court, defence lawyer Zemarai Khatiz, who is representing Mr Nadir, told the media the video was recorded without his client's consent or knowledge. "We'll argue for that to be excluded," he said. "He will be defending the matter on legal and technical grounds." Ms Abu Lebdeh left court surrounded by a group of men who wore black hoodies. One of the men repeatedly said "no comment" as Ms Abu Lebdeh was asked how she will plead. The men jostled with photographers and camera operators as she got into a waiting car.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50806
NSW nurses who allegedly threatened Israeli patients appear in court
Jamie McKinnell - 19 March 2025
Two nurses charged over a video which allegedly included threats to Israeli patients have appeared in a Sydney court.
Ahmad Rashad Nadir, 27 and Sarah Abu Lebdeh, 26, were charged late last month and early this month over the video, which was a recorded online conversation from cam chat app Chatruletka.
In the video, the pair speak to Israeli content creator Max Veifer, who had initially shared an edited version of the conversation.
The nurses, from Bankstown Hospital, allegedly bragged about refusing to treat Israeli patients, killing them and saying they would go to hell.
Ms Abu Lebdeh was charged with three Commonwealth offences — threatening violence to a group, using a carriage service to threaten to kill, and using a carriage service to menace, harass or offend.
Mr Nadir was charged with using a carriage service to menace, harass or offend and possessing a prohibited drug.
According to court documents, Ms Abu Lebdeh's alleged offence of threatening violence to a group relates to "Israeli people, and a reasonable member of that group would fear that the threat will be carried out".
Mr Nadir's drug charge relates to his alleged possession of morphine.
In a packed courtroom at the Downing Centre, where there was standing room only, both cases were adjourned to May 13.
The pair remain on bail and both were excused from attending on the next occasion.
Lawyer to argue video was recorded without consent
Outside court, defence lawyer Zemarai Khatiz, who is representing Mr Nadir, told the media the video was recorded without his client's consent or knowledge.
"We'll argue for that to be excluded," he said.
"He will be defending the matter on legal and technical grounds."
Ms Abu Lebdeh left court surrounded by a group of men who wore black hoodies.
One of the men repeatedly said "no comment" as Ms Abu Lebdeh was asked how she will plead.
The men jostled with photographers and camera operators as she got into a waiting car.
After the video emerged, the nurses were stood down pending an investigation.
The Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency confirmed Mr Nadir and Ms Abu Lebdeh's registrations were suspended.
Late last month, NSW Police Commissioner Karen Webb said police had found no evidence that anyone at Bankstown Hospital was harmed, but an investigation by NSW Health was continuing.
Mr Veifer posted a longer version of the chat in mid-February, saying it was the "unedited" conversation.
That video ran for some two-and-a-half minutes and included parts of the conversation that were originally cut out.
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-03-19/nsw-bankstown-nurses-first-court-appearance-video-israelis/105069608
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50808
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22786702 (190843ZMAR25) Notable: Video: Nurse wants alleged Israeli threat video tossed out - Key evidence allegedly showing two former nurses discussing killing Israeli patients will face a legal challenge, threatening their prosecution. Sarah Abu Lebdeh and Ahmad Rashad Nadir faced court for the first time on Wednesday after sparking national outrage when recorded saying they would refuse to treat Israelis and kill them instead. In unusual scenes, Abu Lebdeh arrived at and left Downing Centre Local Court in a scrum of nine black-clad men, who helped keep a gaggle of cameras and reporters at bay. Nadir arrived in more casual circumstances, dressed in all black and flanked by his lawyer Zemarai Khatiz. After the case was briefly mentioned in court, the solicitor told reporters he planned to apply to have the video underpinning the case tossed out. "The video … was recorded without his (Nadir's) knowledge," Khatiz said outside court. "We will apply to have it excluded." If the application is successful, it could leave prosecutors with little other evidence to rely on in their cases against the nurses.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50806
Nurse wants alleged Israeli threat video tossed out
Jack Gramenz - Mar 19, 2025
Key evidence allegedly showing two former nurses discussing killing Israeli patients will face a legal challenge, threatening their prosecution.
Sarah Abu Lebdeh and Ahmad Rashad Nadir faced court for the first time on Wednesday after sparking national outrage when recorded saying they would refuse to treat Israelis and kill them instead.
The pair were working a night shift at south-west Sydney's Bankstown-Lidcombe Hospital at the time of the alleged threats, made through an online video chat platform in February.
In unusual scenes, Abu Lebdeh arrived at and left Downing Centre Local Court in a scrum of nine black-clad men, who helped keep a gaggle of cameras and reporters at bay.
The 26-year-old kept her face down, with little in view besides her light pink hijab.
Nadir arrived in more casual circumstances, dressed in all black and flanked by his lawyer Zemarai Khatiz.
After the case was briefly mentioned in court, the solicitor told reporters he planned to apply to have the video underpinning the case tossed out.
Charges were laid after footage was shared online by another party to the Chatruletka meet-up, Israeli influencer Max Veifer.
"The video ... was recorded without his (Nadir's) knowledge," Khatiz said outside court.
"We will apply to have it excluded."
If the application is successful, it could leave prosecutors with little other evidence to rely on in their cases against the nurses.
The case was adjourned for eight weeks to enable federal prosecutors to serve the brief of evidence.
Prosecutors plan to take the case to the District Court, where the nurses could face a jury trial and, if convicted, stiffer penalties.
The pair, both on bail, have been excused from attending the next mention on May 13.
Abu Lebdeh has been charged with threatening violence to a group, using a carriage service to threaten to kill and using a carriage service to menace, harass or cause offence.
The 26-year-old has been on bail with conditions prohibiting her from leaving Australia or using social media.
Nadir was hospitalised during the fallout of the video emerging but was charged earlier in March with using a carriage service to menace, harass or cause offence and possession of a prohibited drug.
The 27-year-old previously apologised through his lawyer for the comments he made in the video.
Australia's health practitioner watchdog has barred the duo from working as nurses nationwide and their registrations have been suspended by the NSW Nursing and Midwifery Council.
Their comments were widely condemned including by the prime minister and NSW premier, coming amid alarm about violent antisemitic acts in Sydney and Melbourne.
Many of the highest-profile incidents in Sydney have since been exposed as being organised by criminal networks with no clear ideological motivations.
https://www.9news.com.au/national/sydney-nurses-accused-alleged-antisemitic-threats-to-face-court/77ad3934-6c8e-4633-99fa-ae0e34d70e8d
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PuRPx0sEeQw
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50809
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22786842 (191017ZMAR25) Notable: Huge batch of JFK files reveals shocking Australian link - Australia’s top spy wrote to the CIA asking to keep secret details of an investigation into phone calls made to the US Embassy in Canberra about an assassination plot before President John F. Kennedy was killed, newly declassified files have revealed. The once “Top Secret” cables between the head of ASIO Sir Charles Spry and CIA Director Richard Helms were among more than 80,000 pages of material released by President Donald Trump on Tuesday. They shed more light on discussions between Australia’s top spy agency and the CIA about declassification of the investigation into the phone calls. “Sir Charles’ letter to you recommends against declassification of the Warren Commission document CD-971, which refers to our investigation of anonymous telephone calls to the Canberra Embassy before and after the assassination of President Kennedy,” read the November 1968 memo to Mr Helms from William E. Nelson, chief of the CIA’s Far East Division. Mr Helms’ response to the ASIO chief read, “Dear Charles, thank you for your letter recommending against the declassification of Warren Commission document CD-971. I might mention that our inquiry to you in August (1968) was in anticipation of further pressure for the release of Warren Commission papers, a pressure which has not materialised. Accordingly, there is not, at the present time, any intention to release CD-971. “Should the question be raised at some future time, the points made by you in your letter provide every reason to keep the document out of the public domain.” CD-971, which consisted of a memo from Mr Helms to the Warren Commission about the “crank” calls, was declassified in 1976. But the CIA fought for six decades keep portions of the letter from Sir Charles to Mr Helms secret, until it was released in unredacted form in a previous batch of JFK files in 2023. In his reasons, Sir Charles warned that “it has never been officially stated that there is a ‘CIA Canberra Station’ or that there are CIA officers in Australia”. “Publication of these facts would invoke a spate of questions by the press and in the parliament, which would be contrary to the national security interest,” the letter read.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Huge batch of JFK files reveals shocking Australian link
Tens of thousands of pages of newly released JFK assassination files have revealed a stunning link to Australia.
Benedict Brook - March 19, 2025
1/2
Australia’s top spy wrote to the CIA asking to keep secret details of an investigation into phone calls made to the US Embassy in Canberra about an assassination plot before President John F. Kennedy was killed, newly declassified files have revealed.
The once “Top Secret” cables between the head of ASIO Sir Charles Spry and CIA Director Richard Helms were among more than 80,000 pages of material released by President Donald Trump on Tuesday.
They shed more light on discussions between Australia’s top spy agency and the CIA about declassification of the investigation into the phone calls.
“Sir Charles’ letter to you recommends against declassification of the Warren Commission document CD-971, which refers to our investigation of anonymous telephone calls to the Canberra Embassy before and after the assassination of President Kennedy,” read the November 1968 memo to Mr Helms from William E. Nelson, chief of the CIA’s Far East Division.
Mr Helms’ response to the ASIO chief read, “Dear Charles, thank you for your letter recommending against the declassification of Warren Commission document CD-971. I might mention that our inquiry to you in August (1968) was in anticipation of further pressure for the release of Warren Commission papers, a pressure which has not materialised. Accordingly, there is not, at the present time, any intention to release CD-971.
“Should the question be raised at some future time, the points made by you in your letter provide every reason to keep the document out of the public domain.”
CD-971, which consisted of a memo from Mr Helms to the Warren Commission about the “crank” calls, was declassified in 1976.
But the CIA fought for six decades keep portions of the letter from Sir Charles to Mr Helms secret, until it was released in unredacted form in a previous batch of JFK files in 2023.
In his reasons, Sir Charles warned that “it has never been officially stated that there is a ‘CIA Canberra Station’ or that there are CIA officers in Australia”.
“Publication of these facts would invoke a spate of questions by the press and in the parliament, which would be contrary to the national security interest,” the letter read.
After President Trump promised the unredacted documents would be released, the National Archives published a total of 1123 scanned documents in PDF form on its website on Tuesday night.
“In accordance with President Donald Trump’s directive of March 17, 2025, all records previously withheld for classification that are part of the President John F. Kennedy Assassination Records Collection are released,” the page reads.
It wasn’t immediately clear whether the material contained any bombshells that could put to rest years of conspiracy theories about the former President’s death.
Initial reports suggested many of the records appeared to be slightly less redacted versions of documents that were released previously under the former Biden or Trump administrations.
Former Washington Post journalist Jefferson Morley, who publishes the JFK Facts blog, said the release was “an encouraging start”.
“We now have complete versions of approximately a third of the redacted JFK documents held by the National Archives (1124 of approximately 3500 documents),” Morley said in a statement.
“Rampant overclassification of trivial information has been eliminated and there appear to be no redactions, though we have not viewed every document. Seven of ten JFK files held by the Archives and sought by JFK researchers are now in the public record.
“These long-secret records shed new light on JFK’s mistrust of the CIA, the Castro assassination plots, the surveillance of Oswald in Mexico City, and CIA propaganda operations involving Oswald.
“The release does not include two thirds of the promised files nor any of 500-plus IRS records, nor any of the 2400 recently discovered FBI files. Nonetheless, this is most positive news on the declassification of JFK files since the 1990s.”
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50810
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22786859 (191027ZMAR25) Notable: Video: Declassified JFK assassination files reveal incredible connection to Australia’s top spy agency - The declassified JFK assassination files have revealed an extraordinary connection to Australia - revealing multiple phone calls about an assassination plot made to the US Embassy in Canberra - before the President was killed. The series of once “Top Secret” cables were made between the head of ASIO Sir Charles Spry and the Director of the CIA Richard Helms. They reveal ASIO, Australia’s top spy agency, had asked the CIA to keep the investigation into calls to the US Embassy secret. “Sir Charles’ letter… recommends against declassification of…our investigation of anonymous telephone calls to the Canberra Embassy before and after the assassination of President Kennedy,” the letter read. The document is one of more than 80,000 pages of material released by US President Donald Trump on Wednesday in relation to the 1963 assassination of John F. Kennedy. Trump said he was releasing the documents in order to honour his campaign promise to provide more transparency about the shock event in Texas. “It’s a lot of stuff, and you’ll make your own determination,” Trump told reporters about the pages earlier this week. Trump signed an order shortly after taking office in January related to the release, prompting the FBI to find thousands of new documents related to the Kennedy assassination in Dallas.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50809
Declassified JFK assassination files reveal incredible connection to Australia’s top spy agency
The newly released documents have revealed a discussion between our top spy agency and the CIA.
Chris Reason - 19 March 2025
The declassified JFK assassination files have revealed an extraordinary connection to Australia - revealing multiple phone calls about an assassination plot made to the US Embassy in Canberra - before the President was killed.
The series of once “Top Secret” cables were made between the head of ASIO Sir Charles Spry and the Director of the CIA Richard Helms.
They reveal ASIO, Australia’s top spy agency, had asked the CIA to keep the investigation into calls to the US Embassy secret.
“Sir Charles’ letter… recommends against declassification of…our investigation of anonymous telephone calls to the Canberra Embassy before and after the assassination of President Kennedy,” the letter read.
The document is one of more than 80,000 pages of material released by US President Donald Trump on Wednesday in relation to the 1963 assassination of John F. Kennedy.
Trump said he was releasing the documents in order to honour his campaign promise to provide more transparency about the shock event in Texas.
“It’s a lot of stuff, and you’ll make your own determination,” Trump told reporters about the pages earlier this week.
Trump signed an order shortly after taking office in January related to the release, prompting the FBI to find thousands of new documents related to the Kennedy assassination in Dallas.
Kennedy’s murder has been attributed to a sole gunman, Lee Harvey Oswald.
The Justice Department and other federal government bodies reaffirmed that conclusion in the intervening decades.
But polls show many Americans believe his death was a result of a conspiracy.
Experts doubt the new trove of information to be released on on Tuesday will change the underlying facts of the case, that Lee Harvey Oswald opened fire at Kennedy from a window at a school book deposit warehouse as the presidential motorcade passed by on a Dallas highway.
“People expecting big things are almost certain to be disappointed,” said Larry Sabato, the director of the Center for Politics at the University of Virginia, who authored a book about the assassination.
He said some of the pages could simply be the release of previously published material that had a few words redacted.
Trump has also promised to release documents on the assassinations of civil rights leader Martin Luther King, Jr and Senator Robert Kennedy, both of whom were killed in 1968.
Trump has allowed more time to come up with a plan for those releases.
Trump’s secretary of Health and Human Services, Robert F Kennedy Jr, the son of Robert Kennedy and nephew of John F Kennedy, has said he believes the CIA was involved in his uncle’s death, an allegation the agency has described as baseless.
Kennedy Jr has also said he believes his father was killed by multiple gunmen, an assertion that contradicted official accounts.
One revelation the documents could contain is that the CIA was more aware of Oswald than it has previously disclosed.
Questions have remained about what the CIA knew about Oswald’s visits to Mexico City six weeks before the assassination.
During that trip, Oswald visited the Soviet embassy.
“People have been waiting for decades for this,” Trump said.
“It’s going to be very interesting.”
https://7news.com.au/news/declassified-jfk-assassination-files-reveal-incredible-connection-to-australias-top-spy-agency-c-18087857
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kBApDsG-mDw
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50811
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22792972 (200901ZMAR25) Notable: Big pharma’s plea to Trump to punish Australia for cheaper medicines - American medical giants have slammed the $18 billion pharmaceutical benefits scheme in a plea to US President Donald Trump to impose punitive tariffs on Australia because it subsidises medicines for millions of patients. The US industry has named Australia’s Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme as one of the “egregious and discriminatory” programs to be targeted in Trump’s imminent decision on reciprocal tariffs, blaming the Australian policy for cutting prices and blocking American exporters. The formal complaint, lodged with the president’s trade chief on March 11, calls for tough action to end the “damaging pricing policies” in Australia and other countries in order to add billions of dollars to exports and fix America’s trade deficits. Health Minister Mark Butler and Coalition health spokeswoman Anne Ruston have vowed to keep the PBS off the table in any trade discussions with the Trump administration before the president’s decisions next month on another round of US tariffs on other countries. But the formal US industry position heightens the prospect of reciprocal tariffs on Australian medical companies as a way to force change to the federal government policy and extract better terms for American drugmakers. “Egregious and discriminatory pricing policies in several markets including Australia, Canada, the European Union, Japan and Korea undervalue American innovation, threaten billions of dollars in lost sales and undermine American competitiveness, jobs and exports,” says the formal submission from the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America, known as PhRMA.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50725
>>50785
Big pharma’s plea to Trump to punish Australia for cheaper medicines
David Crowe - March 19, 2025
1/2
American medical giants have slammed the $18 billion pharmaceutical benefits scheme in a plea to US President Donald Trump to impose punitive tariffs on Australia because it subsidises medicines for millions of patients.
The US industry has named Australia’s Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme as one of the “egregious and discriminatory” programs to be targeted in Trump’s imminent decision on reciprocal tariffs, blaming the Australian policy for cutting prices and blocking American exporters.
The formal complaint, lodged with the president’s trade chief on March 11, calls for tough action to end the “damaging pricing policies” in Australia and other countries in order to add billions of dollars to exports and fix America’s trade deficits.
Health Minister Mark Butler and Coalition health spokeswoman Anne Ruston have vowed to keep the PBS off the table in any trade discussions with the Trump administration before the president’s decisions next month on another round of US tariffs on other countries.
But the formal US industry position heightens the prospect of reciprocal tariffs on Australian medical companies as a way to force change to the federal government policy and extract better terms for American drugmakers.
“Egregious and discriminatory pricing policies in several markets including Australia, Canada, the European Union, Japan and Korea undervalue American innovation, threaten billions of dollars in lost sales and undermine American competitiveness, jobs and exports,” says the formal submission from the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America, known as PhRMA.
The peak industry group donated $US1 million ($1.57 million) to Trump’s inauguration in January, and its chief executive, Stephen Ubl, dined with the president at Mar-a-Lago in December alongside Pfizer chief Albert Bourla and Eli Lilly chief David Ricks, both of whom are PhRMA board members. Other PhRMA member companies include Johnson & Johnson, Merck & Co, Bristol Myers Squibb, Novo Nordisk, CSL and Amgen.
The PhRMA submission dedicates a section to Australia alone and blames the Pharmaceutical Benefits Advisory Committee, the expert group that advises the government, for putting barriers in the way of American exports.
“PBAC conducts biased health technology assessments that compare innovative medicines to the lowest-cost comparator,” the submission says, adding that this punishes the US companies.
It also blames the PBS for “unreasonable patient access delays” because the government takes time to consider new medicines and decide whether they should receive a public subsidy to lower the cost for consumers.
“Australia creates unnecessary data requirements and other administrative hurdles to secure PBS listing, causing significant delays,” the submission says.
The PBS cost taxpayers $17.7 billion last financial year and helped reduce the cost of 930 different medicines. It means Australians can buy life-saving drugs worth thousands of dollars for as little as $31.60 per script, often after the government has negotiated with the drug company to secure the best deal for taxpayers.
Medicines Australia, the peak group for the pharmaceutical companies including several PhRMA members, said the PBS was a “world-class universal healthcare program” but should be improved.
“There is, for instance, widespread recognition it takes too long for a new medicine to be listed on the PBS due to measures that undervalue the benefits of new medicines compared to existing treatments,” the industry group said.
Their message has significant cost implications for the government, which would have to increase funding to approve medicines more quickly and address concerns raised in the PhRMA submission. While Butler commissioned a review of the medicine assessment process, he is yet to act on it.
Pharmaceutical products are the third-biggest category in Australia’s exports to the US, after beef and gold. US tariffs on Australian health exports would pose a risk for medical giant CSL, which is a PhRMA member but also exports plasma from Australia to the US.
Friction over the PBS could also influence Trump’s broader agenda on trade sanctions across multiple industries.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50812
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22792982 (200912ZMAR25) Notable: ‘Lopsided and unfair’: Australian farmers in Trump crosshairs - Billions of dollars of Australian beef exports are in the firing line for more Trump tariffs after powerful American farmers accused Australia of running “by far the most lopsided and unfair trading deal” with the US. The attack comes as the White House made clear it would target other countries’ food testing and local content rules, among other non-tariff trade barriers, when it introduces “reciprocal tariffs” next month, with each trading partner assigned a score based on its import duties and perceived trade transgressions. In comments to this masthead, the National Cattlemen’s Beef Association (NCBA), representing 175,000 American cattle farmers and feeders, accused Australia of repeatedly frustrating negotiations to end a ban on uncooked US beef products. “For 20 years, Australian beef has enjoyed the benefits of free trade with the US, and we have been stonewalled over and over again,” said Kent Bacus, the group’s trade chief and executive director for government affairs. “You can’t ignore a $US29 billion [$45 billion] trade deficit in beef [over 20 years]. All we are asking for is fair trade - that really can’t be too much to ask. US beef is the highest quality in the world, and if Australia is unwilling to recognise that, then it is only fair for the US to reciprocate.” The NCBA has also raised these points directly with officials in meetings. In a scathing submission to the US Trade Representative (USTR) - the office managing the reciprocal tariffs due to begin on April 2 – it said: “The US-Australia free trade agreement is by far the most lopsided and unfair trade deal for US cattle producers.” It said Australia used myriad sanitary concerns and “endless bureaucratic red tape” to continue to delay the approval of uncooked US beef, which has been banned since the early 2000s due to fears about mad cow disease in the US. “This is not how allies and trade partners should behave,” the association said. “This is a slap in the face to US cattle producers, and enough is enough.”
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50725
>>50785
>>50811
‘Lopsided and unfair’: Australian farmers in Trump crosshairs
Michael Koziol - March 20, 2025
1/2
Washington: Billions of dollars of Australian beef exports are in the firing line for more Trump tariffs after powerful American farmers accused Australia of running “by far the most lopsided and unfair trading deal” with the US.
The attack comes as the White House made clear it would target other countries’ food testing and local content rules, among other non-tariff trade barriers, when it introduces “reciprocal tariffs” next month, with each trading partner assigned a score based on its import duties and perceived trade transgressions.
In comments to this masthead, the National Cattlemen’s Beef Association (NCBA), representing 175,000 American cattle farmers and feeders, accused Australia of repeatedly frustrating negotiations to end a ban on uncooked US beef products.
“For 20 years, Australian beef has enjoyed the benefits of free trade with the US, and we have been stonewalled over and over again,” said Kent Bacus, the group’s trade chief and executive director for government affairs.
“You can’t ignore a $US29 billion [$45 billion] trade deficit in beef [over 20 years]. All we are asking for is fair trade – that really can’t be too much to ask. US beef is the highest quality in the world, and if Australia is unwilling to recognise that, then it is only fair for the US to reciprocate.”
The NCBA has also raised these points directly with officials in meetings. In a scathing submission to the US Trade Representative (USTR) – the office managing the reciprocal tariffs due to begin on April 2 – it said: “The US-Australia free trade agreement is by far the most lopsided and unfair trade deal for US cattle producers.”
It said Australia used myriad sanitary concerns and “endless bureaucratic red tape” to continue to delay the approval of uncooked US beef, which has been banned since the early 2000s due to fears about mad cow disease in the US.
“This is not how allies and trade partners should behave,” the association said. “This is a slap in the face to US cattle producers, and enough is enough.”
Australia exported more than $4 billion of beef to the US last year, more than any other country. In particular, the NCBA said exports of grain-fed beef had increased 220 per cent, and the American Wagyu Association was concerned that “Australia’s unrestricted access to the US market, coupled with the weak Australian dollar, will continue to undermine US wagyu sales in this highly competitive niche market”.
Agri Beef, an Idaho-based meat wholesaler, said in its submission that Australia had never come close to reaching the “preposterous” export quotas set at the time, which would have triggered tariffs. It said the quotas were overly generous and should be revised and the unfair trade imbalance rectified.
In a hearing of the US Senate’s agriculture committee in late February, NCBA president Buck Wehrbein also complained about the free-trade agreement with Australia.
“We’ve bought beef from them for 20 years, and they haven’t spent one red cent with us,” he told Republican senator Jerry Moran. “So it’s not just having an agreement, but it’s also enforcing the agreements.”
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50813
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22792999 (200934ZMAR25) Notable: Video: Australian university researchers told ‘woke gender ideology’ among reasons behind Trump funding cuts - The Trump administration told Australian university researchers a push to promote administration priorities and avoid “DEI, woke gender ideology and the green new deal” was behind a “temporary pause” of funding, according to a memo seen by Guardian Australia. University sector sources say the US has severed research funding at six universities - Monash University, Australian National University (ANU) and the University of Melbourne, University of Sydney, University of New South Wales and University of Western Australia – since Donald Trump came to power, including some as early as January. ANU is the first university to publicly acknowledged it. The projects, which spanned a range of topics from agriculture to foreign aid, social science and geology, were cancelled pending a review as part of US higher education cuts. Some notifications came directly from US government agencies to researchers. A memo sent to an Australian university project on 27 January on behalf of the US office of management and budget notifying a “temporary pause” of agency funding said the executive branch had a “duty to align federal spending and action with the will of the American people”. “Financial assistance should be dedicated to advancing Administration priorities, focusing taxpayer dollars to advance a stronger and safer America, eliminating the financial burden of inflation for citizens, unleashing American energy and manufacturing, ending ‘wokeness’ and the weaponization of government, promoting efficiency in government, and Making America Healthy Again,” the memo said. “The use of Federal resources to advance Marxist equity, transgenderism, and green new deal social engineering policies is a waste of taxpayer dollars that does not improve the day-to-day lives of those we serve.”
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50785
>>50800
Australian university researchers told ‘woke gender ideology’ among reasons behind Trump funding cuts
Researchers receive memo notifying ‘temporary’ funding pause prompting push for Australian government to pursue European partnerships
Caitlin Cassidy - 20 Mar 2025
1/2
The Trump administration told Australian university researchers a push to promote administration priorities and avoid “DEI, woke gender ideology and the green new deal” was behind a “temporary pause” of funding, according to a memo seen by Guardian Australia.
University sector sources say the US has severed research funding at six universities – Monash University, Australian National University (ANU) and the University of Melbourne, University of Sydney, University of New South Wales and University of Western Australia – since Donald Trump came to power, including some as early as January. ANU is the first university to publicly acknowledged it.
The projects, which spanned a range of topics from agriculture to foreign aid, social science and geology, were cancelled pending a review as part of US higher education cuts. Some notifications came directly from US government agencies to researchers.
A memo sent to an Australian university project on 27 January on behalf of the US office of management and budget notifying a “temporary pause” of agency funding said the executive branch had a “duty to align federal spending and action with the will of the American people”.
“Financial assistance should be dedicated to advancing Administration priorities, focusing taxpayer dollars to advance a stronger and safer America, eliminating the financial burden of inflation for citizens, unleashing American energy and manufacturing, ending ‘wokeness’ and the weaponization of government, promoting efficiency in government, and Making America Healthy Again,” the memo said.
“The use of Federal resources to advance Marxist equity, transgenderism, and green new deal social engineering policies is a waste of taxpayer dollars that does not improve the day-to-day lives of those we serve.”
The memo said each US federal agency must complete a comprehensive analysis of its federal financial assistance to identify programs, projects, and activities that may be implicated by any of the president’s executive orders.
“In the interim, to the extent permissible under applicable law, Federal agencies must temporarily pause all activities related to obligation or disbursement of all Federal financial assistance, and other relevant agency activities that may be implicated by the executive orders, including, but not limited to, financial assistance for foreign aid, nongovernmental organizations, DEI, woke gender ideology, and the green new deal.”
In an email sent to staff on Tuesday, the ANU vice-chancellor, Genevieve Bell, confirmed the university had its “first termination of funding” from the US. According to sources, it was related to a social science project.
“It is hard to ignore the broader contexts in which we are operating – a looming federal election and a growing complexity of geo-political forces impacting us here in Australia,” she wrote. “We are committed to supporting our researchers and the work we do here, in all the ways we can.”
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50814
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22798221 (211048ZMAR25) Notable: US farmers demand Trump slap tariffs on Australia - American agricultural producers, from winemakers to blueberry growers, are bearing down on US President Donald Trump to bypass “protectionist” biosecurity laws and slap tariffs on Australian exports, joining multinationals, big tech and drug companies in demanding the White House overhaul reciprocal trading arrangements with Canberra. As America’s peak trading association described Australia as a “problematic market” with taxes and reporting requirements that the National Foreign Trade Council called “burdensome, discriminatory, or excessive”, US farmers complained about the “dramatic disadvantage” they faced when it came to the trading relationship with Australia. “For nearly two decades, the US blueberry industry has pursued market access for fresh blueberries to Australia … A nearly 20-year delay is unacceptable - this request must be prioritised and completed as soon as possible,” a submission to the trade office by the North American Blueberry Council said. A similar submission from the Northwest Horticultural Council said: “Australia unfairly prohibits the importation of apples from the United States due to expressed phytosanitary concerns, while allowing access for our competitors in the People’s Republic of China and New Zealand”. The formal complaints, lodged with Mr Trump’s trade chief, reveal decades-long resentments US producers harbour against foreign imports and raise the prospect that Australia’s agricultural sectors could face another trade war, just months after China lifted the last of its tariffs on wine, beef, barley and lobster. The Californian Citrus Council criticised Australia’s “unfair trade conditions” in its submission to the trade office, demanding action be taken to limit mandarin imports going forwards. “To remedy this problem, we recommend that Office of the United States Trade Representative negotiate with trading partners to impose a tariff rate quota that would limit the volume of mandarins that can be imported from Chile, Peru, Australia, New Zealand and South Africa from October through May,” the submission said.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50725
>>50785
>>50812
US farmers demand Trump slap tariffs on Australia
RHIANNON DOWN and SARAH ISON - 21 March 2025
1/2
American agricultural producers, from winemakers to blueberry growers, are bearing down on US President Donald Trump to bypass “protectionist” biosecurity laws and slap tariffs on Australian exports, joining multinationals, big tech and drug companies in demanding the White House overhaul reciprocal trading arrangements with Canberra.
As America’s peak trading association described Australia as a “problematic market” with taxes and reporting requirements that the National Foreign Trade Council called “burdensome, discriminatory, or excessive”, US farmers complained about the “dramatic disadvantage” they faced when it came to the trading relationship with Australia.
“For nearly two decades, the US blueberry industry has pursued market access for fresh blueberries to Australia … A nearly 20-year delay is unacceptable – this request must be prioritised and completed as soon as possible,” a submission to the trade office by the North American Blueberry Council said.
A similar submission from the Northwest Horticultural Council said: “Australia unfairly prohibits the importation of apples from the United States due to expressed phytosanitary concerns, while allowing access for our competitors in the People’s Republic of China and New Zealand”.
“Australia only addresses one market access request from the US at a time. A policy clearly designed to limit imports,” the NHC submission said.
The formal complaints, lodged with Mr Trump’s trade chief, reveal decades-long resentments US producers harbour against foreign imports and raise the prospect that Australia’s agricultural sectors could face another trade war, just months after China lifted the last of its tariffs on wine, beef, barley and lobster.
The Californian Citrus Council criticised Australia’s “unfair trade conditions” in its submission to the trade office, demanding action be taken to limit mandarin imports going forwards.
“To remedy this problem, we recommend that Office of the United States Trade Representative negotiate with trading partners to impose a tariff rate quota that would limit the volume of mandarins that can be imported from Chile, Peru, Australia, New Zealand and South Africa from October through May,” the submission said.
President Trump threatened earlier this year to enforce reciprocal tariffs on countries such as Australia as a “matter of fairness”, with Labor ministers admitting on Thursday the new administration seemed “hell bent” on proceeding with the trade sanctions.
It follows the Trump Administration refusing to give Australia an exemption to the 25 per cent tariffs on steel and aluminium, which are worth $1bn to Australia in export value every year.
The California Association of Winegrape Growers also launched a fiery attack on the Australian government over a 29 per cent tax on wine sales that it said was among a number of “unfair, non-reciprocal trade practices” disadvantaging US wine producers.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50815
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22798263 (211106ZMAR25) Notable: Musk and big tech urge Trump to punish Australia - US President Donald Trump is being urged to target Australia over its federal laws on social media and the digital economy in a powerful campaign by American tech giants including Elon Musk to block measures that hurt their profits. The big tech companies have blamed Australia for threatening them with new federal laws and “coercing” them into sacrificing their revenue in schemes such as the News Media Bargaining Incentive, which aims to charge social media platforms to help fund Australian news content. The formal complaint, lodged with Trump’s trade chief on March 11, opens a new front in a growing trade dispute after big US pharmaceutical companies and beef producers also slammed Australia in their plea to Trump to use tariffs and other measures to shield American companies. The Computer & Communications Industry Association (CCIA) also accused Australia of hurting American streaming media platforms by making them pay for local content such as Australian television productions, putting their revenue at risk. The peak industry group, whose members include the X platform owned by Musk - one of Trump’s key allies – also objected to Australian measures on artificial intelligence on the grounds they would curb American innovation. The complaint aims to influence Trump in a looming decision to impose reciprocal tariffs on countries he believes are hurting American exporters. The lengthy submission was backed by CCIA member companies such as Amazon, Apple, Google, X and Meta, the parent company of Facebook and Instagram.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50725
>>50785
>>50814
Musk and big tech urge Trump to punish Australia
David Crowe and Paul Sakkal - March 20, 2025
1/2
US President Donald Trump is being urged to target Australia over its federal laws on social media and the digital economy in a powerful campaign by American tech giants including Elon Musk to block measures that hurt their profits.
The big tech companies have blamed Australia for threatening them with new federal laws and “coercing” them into sacrificing their revenue in schemes such as the News Media Bargaining Incentive, which aims to charge social media platforms to help fund Australian news content.
The formal complaint, lodged with Trump’s trade chief on March 11, opens a new front in a growing trade dispute after big US pharmaceutical companies and beef producers also slammed Australia in their plea to Trump to use tariffs and other measures to shield American companies.
The Computer & Communications Industry Association (CCIA) also accused Australia of hurting American streaming media platforms by making them pay for local content such as Australian television productions, putting their revenue at risk.
The peak industry group, whose members include the X platform owned by Musk – one of Trump’s key allies – also objected to Australian measures on artificial intelligence on the grounds they would curb American innovation.
The complaint aims to influence Trump in a looming decision to impose reciprocal tariffs on countries he believes are hurting American exporters. The lengthy submission was backed by CCIA member companies such as Amazon, Apple, Google, X and Meta, the parent company of Facebook and Instagram.
Meta chief Mark Zuckerberg and Amazon owner Jeff Bezos have emerged as powerful tech industry executives behind the Trump administration amid concerns at the way the “tech bros” are urging the president to protect their interests around the world.
Assistant Treasurer Stephen Jones dismissed the CCIA claim about discrimination against US companies.
“We don’t impose discriminatory laws – everything we’ve proposed in the digital space applies irrespective of the country in which the business operates,” he said.
But the big tech companies wield significant influence in the White House and their complaints could encourage Trump to act against Australia when he decides on whether to impose reciprocal tariffs as early as April 2.
Australia is not a major tech exporter to the US but would be exposed to potential tariffs on commodity exports such as beef.
Unlike other industry groups urging Trump to shield American companies, the CCIA did not advocate tariffs on other countries and instead asked the president to use his office to get other nations to dismantle their trade barriers.
“Imposing targeted, reciprocal measures, while on occasion necessary as a negotiating tool, invariably incurs costs and unintended consequences,” the industry group said of reciprocal tariffs.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50816
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22798293 (211115ZMAR25) Notable: ‘Welcome to country or fail course’ convener doubles down - Macquarie University law students who face the threat of failing a component of a key exam if they perform an underwhelming acknowledgment of country have been made to adopt different personas and perform a “privilege walk” in order to better understand power and status. Age and the Law course convenor Holly Doel-Mackaway on Wednesday doubled down on revelations published in The Australian that students were marked on their delivery of an acknowledgment of country, saying they would “not meet the metric or rubric” if they did not perform an appropriate proclamation. It comes as two students told The Australian the university’s law course has become hijacked by a political ideology that was damaging to their education, with one saying they felt pressured to “express an opinion that I don’t truly believe in”. Dr Doel-Mackaway was the course convener of part of a unit for honours students that required them to deliver an acknowledgment of country and to be assessed on their delivery. One former honours student told The Australian that a core component of the oral presentation of their thesis topic was the delivery of “an ‘exceptionally thoughtful and respectful Acknowledgement of Country or Welcome to Country’ connected to our chosen topic, which was to consume roughly 30 seconds of each student’s three-minute presentation”. The student, who would speak to The Australian only on the condition of anonymity, said the Acknowledgement of Country had no connection with their honours thesis subject.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>>/qresearch/22482279 (pb)
>>50714
>>50803
‘Welcome to country or fail course’ convener doubles down
JANET ALBRECHTSEN and JOANNA PANAGOPOULOS - March 19, 2025
1/2
Macquarie University law students who face the threat of failing a component of a key exam if they perform an underwhelming acknowledgment of country have been made to adopt different personas and perform a “privilege walk” in order to better understand power and status.
Age and the Law course convenor Holly Doel-Mackaway on Wednesday doubled down on revelations published in The Australian that students were marked on their delivery of an acknowledgment of country, saying they would “not meet the metric or rubric” if they did not perform an appropriate proclamation.
It comes as two students told The Australian the university’s law course has become hijacked by a political ideology that was damaging to their education, with one saying they felt pressured to “express an opinion that I don’t truly believe in”.
Dr Doel-Mackaway was the course convener of part of a unit for honours students that required them to deliver an acknowledgment of country and to be assessed on their delivery.
One former honours student told The Australian that a core component of the oral presentation of their thesis topic was the delivery of “an ‘exceptionally thoughtful and respectful Acknowledgement of Country or Welcome to Country’ connected to our chosen topic, which was to consume roughly 30 seconds of each student’s three-minute presentation”.
The student, who would speak to The Australian only on the condition of anonymity, said the Acknowledgement of Country had no connection with their honours thesis subject.
The student said Dr Doel-Mackaway had posted to Macquarie’s internal online learning platform that the function of this component was in “acknowledging your positionality as a student of law on this unceded land”.
“It’s the fault of the university and no one is suffering the harm more than the students of its law school,” the student said on Wednesday, saying the practice was damaging to the law school’s reputation.
“It doesn’t affect the tutors or supervisors or the conveners to the extent that, at the end of the day, they’re just going to walk through the door the following day and continue doing what they’re doing. But it reflects upon the students who are going out and applying for these jobs. And you’ve got these partners at places like Mallesons, Freehills and Allens who would look at this stuff and think ‘That’s crazy. I don’t want to hire a kid who’s been taught by people like this.’ ”
Following questions from The Australian, Macquarie University said a compulsory acknowledgment to traditional Aboriginal owners was removed from an honours unit at the end of last year. However, it said it was still “considered appropriate” for the elective Age and the Law as it was “one way of enabling students to better connect with the cultural context in which they might be working”, including working with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples.
A fifth-year Macquarie law student, who spoke on the condition of anonymity for fear of retribution, detailed other unconventional teaching methods used in Age and the Law, including a “privilege walk” where the course convener provided students with personalities “from poor children with diseases to CEOs of large companies”.
They were required to assume those personalities and take a step forward if they believed a scenario applied to them, for example: “I eat three meals a day.”
Those with “privileged positions” progressed to the other end of the room while the “oppressed people stayed behind”.
“We were then made to feel bad for having these positions. The convener told those of us with jobs or positions of power that we had achieved our positions by ‘stepping on the shoulders of others’,” the student said.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50817
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22798373 (211130ZMAR25) Notable: Dutton takes swipe at Rudd, says Trump would be top priority - Peter Dutton says he will seek a meeting with Donald Trump in the early days of a Coalition government, blaming previous criticisms of the US president by Labor and its failure to anticipate Trump’s election victory for leaving Australia helpless in the trade wars. In a keynote foreign policy address to the Lowy Institute on Thursday, the opposition leader stressed his disapproval of the “unjustified” decision by Trump to hit Australia and other allies with tariffs, but argued he was better suited to deal with the president than Anthony Albanese. Dutton suggested the US would be the first country he would visit if elected. He said it spoke volumes that the government first found out from the media last week that the steel and aluminium tariff exemption would not be granted, and that Albanese had not been able to secure a phone call with Trump recently. “Australia is paying the price for Labor’s ill-disciplined and disparaging remarks against President Trump, and they didn’t believe that he was ever going to win the election, which undermined their standing right at the very start,” he said. He singled out the abusive and critical tweets that Australia’s US ambassador Kevin Rudd did not delete until after Trump had been elected in November. Dutton suggested Rudd was not up to the job. “The ambassador seems to be persona non grata. The prime minister can’t get a phone call or a visit to Washington, and that doesn’t bode well for whatever is coming next,” he said of an expected second wave of tariffs to hit as early as April 2.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50708
>>50755
>>50785
Dutton takes swipe at Rudd, says Trump would be top priority
Phillip Coorey - Mar 20, 2025
Peter Dutton says he will seek a meeting with Donald Trump in the early days of a Coalition government, blaming previous criticisms of the US president by Labor and its failure to anticipate Trump’s election victory for leaving Australia helpless in the trade wars.
In a keynote foreign policy address to the Lowy Institute on Thursday, the opposition leader stressed his disapproval of the “unjustified” decision by Trump to hit Australia and other allies with tariffs, but argued he was better suited to deal with the president than Anthony Albanese.
Dutton suggested the US would be the first country he would visit if elected. He said it spoke volumes that the government first found out from the media last week that the steel and aluminium tariff exemption would not be granted, and that Albanese had not been able to secure a phone call with Trump recently.
“Australia is paying the price for Labor’s ill-disciplined and disparaging remarks against President Trump, and they didn’t believe that he was ever going to win the election, which undermined their standing right at the very start,” he said.
He singled out the abusive and critical tweets that Australia’s US ambassador Kevin Rudd did not delete until after Trump had been elected in November. Dutton suggested Rudd was not up to the job.
“The ambassador seems to be persona non grata. The prime minister can’t get a phone call or a visit to Washington, and that doesn’t bode well for whatever is coming next,” he said of an expected second wave of tariffs to hit as early as April 2.
“I don’t believe that the government had anticipated the prospect of the election of President Trump or surely Ambassador Rudd would have deleted tweets before President Trump was elected, there would have been a greater nurturing of the relationship and likely appointees to the administration, all of these things that we were contemplating, the people that we’ve worked with before.
“The government has squandered that opportunity which has been to our national detriment.”
Break with history
Dutton said he would also press Trump to restore some or all of the aid programs in the Indo-Pacific he has cut, opening the door for China to extend its influence in the region.
“I don’t agree with some of the funding that they’ve withdrawn, and I think it is detrimental to the collective interests in the region, and I hope that there can be a discussion between our governments about a sensible pathway forward in that regard,” he said.
Visiting the US first would be a break with history given every newly elected prime minister since Gough Whitlam, except Albanese, has made Indonesia their first foreign port of call. Albanese was forced to attend the Quadrilateral Security Dialogue in Japan two days after he was elected, but visited Indonesia soon afterwards.
Dutton stressed the importance of the Indonesian relationship, as well as that with Japan and China.
“I think there are a number of competing priorities, but my sense would be that at this time in our national interests, the United States would be a very early first visit,” he said.
“I will seek to meet President Trump in Washington in the early days of the Dutton Coalition government. I will talk to him about how our national interests are our mutual interests.”
Since Trump was elected, polls show more voters believe Dutton was better suited to handle the US president than Albanese. In The Australian Financial Review/Freshwater Strategy poll for March, however, that advantage was cut back.
It shows 42 per cent of respondents believe Dutton is best suited to handle Trump, which is a 5-percentage-point drop since November, just after Trump was elected, while Albanese has risen 4 points to 40 per cent as the preferred Trump whisperer.
Dutton also claimed he would handle the relationship with Chinese strongman Xi Jinping better.
“I don’t believe that President Xi, with the strength of his leadership, respects a weak and incompetent Australian prime minister, and I believe that our relationship is best enhanced where we can have a respectful relationship, and that is achieved if we’re able to speak frankly about our points of differences and engage vigorously on our points of mutual interest,” he said.
“I do want to see the trading relationship prosper and expand, but I’m not going to pretend that we haven’t just had a circumnavigation of our country, which has significant consequences for our own outlook in the region and what that means for our national security interests.”
https://www.afr.com/politics/federal/how-dutton-would-manage-the-trump-relationship-as-pm-20250320-p5lkzp
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50818
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22798431 (211145ZMAR25) Notable: Video: Protester tackled during Peter Dutton Lowy Institute speech - A protester has been tackled by security as he tried to interrupt a speech from Opposition Leader Peter Dutton. The heckler was the second person within minutes to stand up and interject during Mr Dutton’s speech on foreign policy at the Lowy Institute. The man was forced out of the room by a member of security, landing on other people seated in his row and continuing to shout as he was escorted out. Another protester had only minutes earlier shouted out: “Mr Dutton, why are you lying to the Australian people about the cost of nuclear?” as the Liberal leader started to present his speech. He was also removed from the event. The protesters held up a banner reading “nuclear lies cost us all”. Mr Dutton did not acknowledge either protest and continued with his speech but later joked with the audience “we live in a great democracy”. Environmental group Rising Tide has claimed credit for the protest and said it was designed to criticise the Coalition’s proposal to build a nuclear energy industry. “Rising Tide protesters Zack Schofield and Nigel Cox unfurled the banner, asking Mr Dutton ‘why are you lying to the Australian People’ before being escorted out of the building by Federal Police and security,” the group said on Thursday afternoon.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50708
>>50785
>>50817
Protester tackled during Peter Dutton Lowy Institute speech
DUNCAN EVANS - March 20, 2025
1/2
A protester has been tackled by security as he tried to interrupt a speech from Opposition Leader Peter Dutton.
The heckler was the second person within minutes to stand up and interject during Mr Dutton’s speech on foreign policy at the Lowy Institute.
The man was forced out of the room by a member of security, landing on other people seated in his row and continuing to shout as he was escorted out.
Another protester had only minutes earlier shouted out: “Mr Dutton, why are you lying to the Australian people about the cost of nuclear?” as the Liberal leader started to present his speech.
He was also removed from the event.
The protesters held up a banner reading “nuclear lies cost us all”.
Mr Dutton did not acknowledge either protest and continued with his speech but later joked with the audience “we live in a great democracy”.
Environmental group Rising Tide has claimed credit for the protest and said it was designed to criticise the Coalition’s proposal to build a nuclear energy industry.
“Rising Tide protesters Zack Schofield and Nigel Cox unfurled the banner, asking Mr Dutton ‘why are you lying to the Australian People’ before being escorted out of the building by Federal Police and security,” the group said on Thursday afternoon.
In the speech, Mr Dutton outlined the Coalition’s national security vision for Australia, saying the country confronted a “far more uncertain and dangerous world today than at any time in recent memory”.
An “imperialistic (Russian President Vladimir) Putin seems determined to swallow up Ukraine,” Mr Dutton said, while the Chinese Communist Party continued to assert itself “militarily in our region and across the world”.
Mr Dutton said a Coalition government would pursue three overarching objectives: to expand free-trading relationships to defend Australia’s export heavy economy, repair what he called a breakdown in the US relationship and invest more heavily in the country’s defence industry and capabilities.
“I can announce today that one of our priorities will be taking forward a robust free-trade agenda,” he said.
“We will reinvigorate negotiating a high-quality Free Trade Agreement with the European Union that’s stalled under Labor.
“We will revitalise discussions on a free-trade agreement with our trusted partner, Israel – building on a strong economic relationship and looking to harness Israel’s strengths in technology and research and development.
“We will seek to expand opportunities for trade and investment with Canada and other like-minded countries.
“And we will use our role as chair of the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for trans-Pacific Partnership to shape the international trade system consistent with our national interests.”
Mr Dutton defended AUKUS, the agreement between the US, the UK and Australia for Australia to acquire nuclear-powered submarines, and said he would visit the US on his first trip abroad to “repair” the relationship with the Trump administration.
“The United States is still our most important partner,” he said.
“And we are an important partner to the United States.
“The question Australians should ask themselves is this: who is better placed to manage the US relationship and engage with President Trump?”
Mr Dutton also stressed a Coalition government would lift defence spending as a share of GDP above current levels and invest heavily in Australia’s defence industry.
“When the Coalition came to power in 2013, defence spending under Labor was at 1.56 per cent of GDP – the lowest levels since 1938,” he said.
“We lifted it beyond 2 per cent of GDP.
“But under the Albanese Government, defence spending as a per cent of GDP has hardly shifted … A Dutton Coalition government will make a significant investment in defence, including by reprioritising Canberra-centric funding,” he said.
“We’ve already committed an initial $3bn of additional funding to reinstate the fourth squadron of F-35 Joint Strike Fighters cancelled by Labor.
“Ukraine has shown that a smaller military can inflict significant damage against a larger adversary with the right asymmetric capabilities and tactics.
“I want to see our domestic defence industry given the confidence and investment to develop small and cheap capabilities quickly and in bulk.
“A modern defence force needs missiles, drones, uncrewed undersea vessels, and small surface vessels armed to the teeth.
“Importantly, AUKUS is the linchpin to create a seamless defence production partnership with the United States leveraging our combined industrial strengths.”
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50819
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22798517 (211218ZMAR25) Notable: Mosques, flyers, Palestine flags: Inside Muslim Vote’s war to win Sydney’s southwest - The Muslim Vote’s army of volunteers have leafleted mosques, distributed tens of thousands of flyers and decked Lakemba in Palestine flags as the political campaign ramps up its efforts to topple two Labor ministers. Federal parliament, one volunteer said, needed more Muslim Vote-backed candidates to break its “Zio-controlled narrative” (Zio is an offensive term for Zionist) as campaigners prepared to accelerate its Gaza-centric campaign in Sydney’s southwest amid community anger with Labor. Insider information from the movement comes amid the resumption of Israeli airstrikes in Gaza and possibly only 10 days before Anthony Albanese fires a starting gun on May’s federal poll. Founded by Sheikh Wesam Charkawi, The Muslim Vote - separate from the Muslim Votes Matter campaign sharing a similar name – is mobilising volunteers and how-to-vote cards, with a particular focus to dump Labor ministers Tony Burke, in Watson, and Jason Clare, in Blaxland. Although not a registered party, the campaign played a key role establishing the independent campaigns of Ziad Basyouny and Ahmed Ouf in Watson and Blaxland respectively, whose operations it is helping to co-ordinate. The Australian can reveal that on top of each candidate’s own teams, The Muslim Vote’s 60-plus “core” volunteers have devised scripts for canvassers to better articulate their anti-ALP message and canvassed at prominent mosques across the two divisions, which has become a campaign focus. Volunteers have leafleted almost all the area’s mosques, with campaigners being divided between locations to better maximise resources. One of the campaign’s co-ordinators said across one night, volunteers had attended 16 mosques, distributing 10,000-plus flyers.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50708
>>50755
>>50712
Mosques, flyers, Palestine flags: Inside Muslim Vote’s war to win Sydney’s southwest
ALEXI DEMETRIADI - March 20, 2025
1/2
The Muslim Vote’s army of volunteers have leafleted mosques, distributed tens of thousands of flyers and decked Lakemba in Palestine flags as the political campaign ramps up its efforts to topple two Labor ministers.
Federal parliament, one volunteer said, needed more Muslim Vote-backed candidates to break its “Zio-controlled narrative” (Zio is an offensive term for Zionist) as campaigners prepared to accelerate its Gaza-centric campaign in Sydney’s southwest amid community anger with Labor.
Insider information from the movement comes amid the resumption of Israeli airstrikes in Gaza and possibly only 10 days before Anthony Albanese fires a starting gun on May’s federal poll.
It also comes as Sydney’s Lakemba Mosque on Thursday was subject to a shooting threat, with an Instagram user posting on the mosque’s account “Christchurch again please”.
NSW Premier Chris Minns called the post “truly disgusting”, confirming that NSW police had launched an “urgent investigation”, which follows a similar threat towards a different mosque in early March.
Founded by Sheikh Wesam Charkawi, The Muslim Vote – separate from the Muslim Votes Matter campaign sharing a similar name – is mobilising volunteers and how-to-vote cards, with a particular focus to dump Labor ministers Tony Burke, in Watson, and Jason Clare, in Blaxland.
Although not a registered party, the campaign played a key role establishing the independent campaigns of Ziad Basyouny and Ahmed Ouf in Watson and Blaxland respectively, whose operations it is helping to co-ordinate.
The Australian can reveal that on top of each candidate’s own teams, The Muslim Vote’s 60-plus “core” volunteers have devised scripts for canvassers to better articulate their anti-ALP message and canvassed at prominent mosques across the two divisions, which has become a campaign focus.
Volunteers have leafleted almost all the area’s mosques, with campaigners being divided between locations to better maximise resources.
One of the campaign’s co-ordinators said across one night, volunteers had attended 16 mosques, distributing 10,000-plus flyers.
On two occasions, vandals also stole and defaced Mr Clare’s corflutes that had been pinned to the front fence of Auburn’s Gallipoli Mosque – a Sunni Islam masjid with a predominantly Turkish-Australian congregation that is supportive of the education minister – with insiders from both sets of warring camps expecting the “gloves to come off” once the election is called.
Muslim Vote campaigners have also been deployed with leaflets, corflutes and A-frame posters across southwest Sydney’s Ramadan night markets in Lakemba and Auburn.
For the “Lakemba Nights” event, where food stalls take over Haldon St for the holy month’s duration, volunteers installed more 20 large Palestine flags above shop fronts.
Volunteers have been devising “scripts” for colleagues to better convince voters, with one suggesting that volunteers raise Labor’s lack of support for academic Randa Abdel-Fattah – whose research grant was recently suspended – and dumped Creative Australia artist Khaled Sabsabi.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50820
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22798537 (211224ZMAR25) Notable: Muslim Votes Matter backs Greens candidate in Wills - Australian advocacy group Muslim Votes Matter has backed Greens candidate Samantha Ratnam in one of its target seats for the upcoming federal election, as it protests against the government’s response to the Israel-Gaza conflict. MVM announced on Sunday it had endorsed Ms Ratnam - a high-profile candidate who was formerly leader of the Victorian Greens – for the seat of Wills in Melbourne’s north. Wills is one of nine electorates MVM is targeting, and is held by Labor MP Peter Khalil, who beat the Greens by 15,632 votes at the 2022 election. Spokesman Ghaith Krayem said MVM had backed Ms Ratnam because of her “strong commitment to social justice, human rights and equity”, which he said aligned with the group’s key priorities. “She has taken a firm stance on Palestinian rights, committing to active condemnation of genocide and occupation, supporting economic sanctions and advocating for accountability under international law,” Mr Krayem said. “She’s championed religious freedom and supported systemic reforms to combat Islamophobia, backing a human rights-based approach to anti-racism policies. “She’s also advocated for a fair, humane asylum-seeker policy, and committed to ethical governance, including banning corporate political donations and increasing transparency in Australia’s military and trade policies.”
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50708
>>50755
>>50819
Muslim Votes Matter backs Greens candidate in Wills
LILY MCCAFFREY - March 09, 2025
Australian advocacy group Muslim Votes Matter has backed Greens candidate Samantha Ratnam in one of its target seats for the upcoming federal election, as it protests against the government’s response to the Israel-Gaza conflict.
MVM announced on Sunday it had endorsed Ms Ratnam – a high-profile candidate who was formerly leader of the Victorian Greens – for the seat of Wills in Melbourne’s north.
Wills is one of nine electorates MVM is targeting, and is held by Labor MP Peter Khalil, who beat the Greens by 15,632 votes at the 2022 election.
Spokesman Ghaith Krayem said MVM had backed Ms Ratnam because of her “strong commitment to social justice, human rights and equity”, which he said aligned with the group’s key priorities.
“She has taken a firm stance on Palestinian rights, committing to active condemnation of genocide and occupation, supporting economic sanctions and advocating for accountability under international law,” Mr Krayem said.
“She’s championed religious freedom and supported systemic reforms to combat Islamophobia, backing a human rights-based approach to anti-racism policies.
“She’s also advocated for a fair, humane asylum-seeker policy, and committed to ethical governance, including banning corporate political donations and increasing transparency in Australia’s military and trade policies.”
Ms Ratnam said she had heard from countless Muslim voters in Wills and across the country that Labor had failed to represent them.
“Labor has taken the votes of multicultural communities for granted, and we are hearing more and more that people are fed up with Liberal and Labor and want a change,” she said.
“The Liberals won’t win in Wills, so voters have a choice between a Greens MP who will represent their interests or a Labor backbencher.
“Voters in Wills are powerful, and if just one in 10 people shift their votes, they can elect me as their local member to push Labor to pressure the state of Israel to end the genocide, build affordable housing, stop new coal and gas, and put dental and mental health into Medicare.”
Mr Krayem emphasised that MVM was not aligned with any political party and said the group’s eight other endorsements – to be announced in the next two weeks – would be a “very diverse” mix of independents and minor parties, including more candidates from the Greens.
Mr Krayem said the catalyst for the creation of MVM – which he described as a grassroots, community-driven movement – was “unquestionably the Australian government’s response to the unfolding genocide in Gaza and Palestine”.
“Our community feels very strongly that its voice has not been heard or represented by both ends of the political spectrum with respect to that issue,” he said.
“But that’s just reflective of a whole range of issues that our community feels it has been sidelined and marginalised for.
“Muslim Votes Matter is all about empowering and mobilising the Muslim community’s voice so that we are an active part of the process within this country.”
MVM, which plans to issue how-to-vote cards in all 150 seats at the election – will endorse candidates and campaign in the Victorian seats of Wills, Calwell and Bruce, the NSW seats of Watson, Blaxland and Werriwa, the Queensland electorate of Moreton, Sturt in South Australia and the Western Australian electorate of Cowan.
Mr Krayem said the electorates were selected based on the size of their Muslim population as well as the group’s ability to make a strategic impact come election day.
https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/muslim-votes-matter-backs-greens-candidate-in-wills/news-story/23e8fa1dd6933cf64ffaba76d90e4f59
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50821
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22808536 (230831ZMAR25) Notable: Uncertainty over Australian Abrams tanks donated to Ukraine - A delivery of second-hand Australian Abrams tanks to Ukraine faces possible complications after US President Donald Trump's recent temporary freeze on military assistance to the war-torn nation. As the Defence department acknowledges the international military transfer remains "complex", the ABC can also reveal Ukraine's Defence Minister Rustem Umierov is scheduled to soon visit Canberra to discuss Australia's ongoing support. Last year the Albanese government announced it would send the Army's retired M1A1 vehicles to help bolster the fight against Russia's invasion, but operations have stalled at a US-funded logistics facility in Poland which was soon expected to process the fleet. Last week Poland's Minister of National Defence Wladyslaw Kosiniak-Kamysz insisted normal operations had resumed at Rzeszów after a week-long disruption, telling reporters, "We are closely monitoring the aid flowing into Ukraine." One American official, who asked for anonymity so they could speak freely, claimed the US government last year cautioned Australia against donating the aging tanks because of the logistical expense and difficulties around maintaining the vehicles inside Ukraine. Sources in Europe say the status of the jointly run logistics hub in the eastern Polish city of Rzeszów, which was established at the beginning of the war, is now in doubt following the Trump administration's recent animosity towards Ukraine.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>>/qresearch/22513240 (pb)
>>50731
>>50801
Uncertainty over Australian Abrams tanks donated to Ukraine
Andrew Greene - 23 March 2025
A delivery of second-hand Australian Abrams tanks to Ukraine faces possible complications after US President Donald Trump's recent temporary freeze on military assistance to the war-torn nation.
As the Defence department acknowledges the international military transfer remains "complex", the ABC can also reveal Ukraine's Defence Minister Rustem Umierov is scheduled to soon visit Canberra to discuss Australia's ongoing support.
Last year the Albanese government announced it would send the Army's retired M1A1 vehicles to help bolster the fight against Russia's invasion, but operations have stalled at a US-funded logistics facility in Poland which was soon expected to process the fleet.
Last week Poland's Minister of National Defence Wladyslaw Kosiniak-Kamysz insisted normal operations had resumed at Rzeszów after a week-long disruption, telling reporters, "We are closely monitoring the aid flowing into Ukraine."
One American official, who asked for anonymity so they could speak freely, claimed the US government last year cautioned Australia against donating the aging tanks because of the logistical expense and difficulties around maintaining the vehicles inside Ukraine.
Sources in Europe say the status of the jointly run logistics hub in the eastern Polish city of Rzeszów, which was established at the beginning of the war, is now in doubt following the Trump administration's recent animosity towards Ukraine.
It is estimated that more than 80 per cent of Western military donations to Ukraine have crossed Polish territory, and the POLLOG HUB facility in Rzeszów is considered critical to collecting and shipping global assistance to the war effort.
According to figures familiar with the Rzeszów operation, several US military logistics units have recently withdrawn from the facility, which is where Australia's 49 American-made Abrams tanks are soon due to arrive after being shipped to Europe.
Retired Army Major General Mick Ryan has told the ABC the gifted M1A1 vehicles are desperately needed to help Ukraine fight back against Russian President Vladimir Putin's invasion, which began more than three years ago.
"If the US military system isn't able to move these things in a timely fashion, we should be looking at working with our Polish friends or even private contractors — obviously considering security issues, to get these things to Ukraine as soon as we possibly can," he said.
"These tanks are needed for the Ukrainians to defend their country against Russia. They're not moving them to some exercise, so a sense of urgency is required here by the Department of Defence."
In a statement the Defence Department said it was "working closely with partners, including the United States, to enable provision of the M1A1 Abrams tanks to Ukraine at the earliest opportunity.
"Australia stands with Ukraine and the Ukrainian people in their defence against Russia's unprovoked, illegal and immoral aggression," a Defence spokesperson said in response to questions from the ABC.
"This is evident through the Australian government's commitment of over $1.5 billion, including over $1.3 billion in military support through vital equipment.
Earlier, the department had acknowledged the process was "complex" and "ongoing", and Prime Minister Anthony Albanese told reporters on Sunday getting equipment into Ukraine was "a difficult task".
"The government is doing everything that we can to provide support in an expedited way, but we know that there are logistics challenges. This is a war going on," he said.
Earlier this month Defence Industry Minister Pat Conroy acknowledged "a number of technology restrictions around the deployment of Abrams tanks", but insisted Australia was working with partner countries and they would be deployed in Ukraine.
Government sources have confirmed Ukrainian Defence Minister Rustem Umierov was scheduled to fly into Canberra this week as the pre-election budget is handed down, but his visit has been delayed due to other urgent travel commitments.
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-03-23/uncertainty-for-australian-donated-abrams-tanks/105085026
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50822
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22812815 (240855ZMAR25) Notable: Video: Monique Ryan, husband apologise after he is filmed removing Liberal sign - Teal MP Monique Ryan and her husband Peter Jordan have apologised after he was filmed removing a sign backing local Liberal candidate Amelia Hamer, marking the highest profile incident in a tit-for-tat signage war in the battleground seat of Kooyong. Videos obtained by this masthead show two youths slashing a Liberal sign to “humiliate” a homeowner while Ryan posters have been defaced with markers as the increasingly intense contest defies the affluent east Melbourne seat’s genteel character and some incidents end up in court. Ryan, who campaigned on restoring integrity to politics, and her husband both apologised for his behaviour on Saturday. “I unreservedly apologise for removing the sign,” Jordan said in a statement after video of the encounter was revealed by The Age and The Sydney Morning Herald on Monday. “It was a mistake. I believed the sign was illegally placed but should have reported my concerns to council.” The footage of Jordan shows the MP’s husband walking briskly away with Hamer’s placard under his arm down a street in Camberwell as the person filming asks a series of questions. “I’m taking the sign down,” Jordan says in the video. When asked why, he says: “it’s on public land”. Jordan is asked repeatedly who he is by the man filming, who notes Jordan is wearing a teal shirt underneath his jumper. “I’m not saying who I am,” Jordan responds. At one point, the man attempts to take the sign away from Jordan on the basis that it remains his property. Jordan pulls it back, saying: “if it goes back up, it’ll be taken down again”. “It’s an illegally put up sign, anyone can take [it] down because it’s illegal.” Jordan, who is an executive at a medical device company, eventually surrenders the sign. Ryan echoed her husband’s apology for removing the sign. “It should not have happened,” she said. “All concerns around signage should be reported to council.”
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50708
>>50755
Monique Ryan, husband apologise after he is filmed removing Liberal sign
Olivia Ireland and Rachael Dexter - March 24, 2025
1/2
Teal MP Monique Ryan and her husband Peter Jordan have apologised after he was filmed removing a sign backing local Liberal candidate Amelia Hamer, marking the highest profile incident in a tit-for-tat signage war in the battleground seat of Kooyong.
Videos obtained by this masthead show two youths slashing a Liberal sign to “humiliate” a homeowner while Ryan posters have been defaced with markers as the increasingly intense contest defies the affluent east Melbourne seat’s genteel character and some incidents end up in court.
Ryan, who campaigned on restoring integrity to politics, and her husband both apologised for his behaviour on Saturday. “I unreservedly apologise for removing the sign,” Jordan said in a statement after video of the encounter was revealed by The Age and The Sydney Morning Herald on Monday.
“It was a mistake. I believed the sign was illegally placed but should have reported my concerns to council.”
The footage of Jordan shows the MP’s husband walking briskly away with Hamer’s placard under his arm down a street in Camberwell as the person filming asks a series of questions.
“I’m taking the sign down,” Jordan says in the video. When asked why, he says: “it’s on public land”.
Jordan is asked repeatedly who he is by the man filming, who notes Jordan is wearing a teal shirt underneath his jumper. “I’m not saying who I am,” Jordan responds.
At one point, the man attempts to take the sign away from Jordan on the basis that it remains his property. Jordan pulls it back, saying: “if it goes back up, it’ll be taken down again”.
“It’s an illegally put up sign, anyone can take [it] down because it’s illegal.”
Jordan, who is an executive at a medical device company, eventually surrenders the sign. Ryan echoed her husband’s apology for removing the sign.
“It should not have happened,” she said. “All concerns around signage should be reported to council.”
The man who recorded the video, who asked not to be named, told this masthead it was filmed on Saturday afternoon while he was visiting his parents.
“I was out the front doing some gardening and I hear some weird grunting noise and I opened up the door and there was a bloke ripping out the sign,” he said.
The man said he and his family are Liberal supporters, but not members of the party. He claimed he told Jordan he could have knocked on the door to ask the sign be moved instead of taking it.
“The sign was on the nature strip, but it’s hard to know where to draw the line in placing it,” he said.
Under state and local laws, campaign signs are not allowed to extend over, or be placed on, council land or public property such as nature strips.
A spokesman for Boroondara Council said it would not “proactively remove or review signage” but did investigate all reports by residents.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50823
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22812831 (240908ZMAR25) Notable: Video: Monique Ryan’s husband Peter Jordan filmed removing Amelia Hamer poster in Kooyong electorate - The husband of Teal MP Monique Ryan has apologised after he was caught pulling down a Liberal competitor’s poster. A video shows Peter Jordan carrying a large Amelia Hamer poster down the street near Burke Rd, Hawthorn, in the Kooyong electorate over the weekend. When asked why he was taking the sign, he claims the poster is an “illegally put up sign” and “anyone can take it down”. “If it goes back up it will be taken down again,” he says in the video. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said people had pinched his posters in every election campaign he’d been involved in. “Should it happen? No, it shouldn’t. We should have respect,” Mr Albanese told 3AW. “We’re a great democracy and people have a right to stand and have a right to put forward their cases. “Frankly, the taking down of posters or the taking of leaflets out of letter boxes, any of that stuff is always quite counterproductive.” And on Monday morning, Mr Jordan changed his tune about his actions, saying it was a “mistake” to tear the sign down. “I unreservedly apologise for removing the sign - it was a mistake,” he said. “I believed the sign was illegally placed but I should have reported my concerns to council.” Dr Ryan also apologised for the removal of the sign saying “it should not have happened”.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50822
Monique Ryan’s husband Peter Jordan filmed removing Amelia Hamer poster in Kooyong electorate
The husband of Teal MP Monique Ryan says tearing down a Liberal rival’s poster was “a mistake” despite originally being filmed threatening to do it again.
James Campbell and Jade Gailberger - March 24, 2025
1/2
The husband of Teal MP Monique Ryan has apologised after he was caught pulling down a Liberal competitor’s poster.
A video shows Peter Jordan carrying a large Amelia Hamer poster down the street near Burke Rd, Hawthorn, in the Kooyong electorate over the weekend.
When asked why he was taking the sign, he claims the poster is an “illegally put up sign” and “anyone can take it down”.
“If it goes back up it will be taken down again,” he says in the video.
Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said people had pinched his posters in every election campaign he’d been involved in.
“Should it happen? No, it shouldn’t. We should have respect,” Mr Albanese told 3AW.
“We’re a great democracy and people have a right to stand and have a right to put forward their cases.
“Frankly, the taking down of posters or the taking of leaflets out of letter boxes, any of that stuff is always quite counterproductive.”
And on Monday morning, Mr Jordan changed his tune about his actions, saying it was a “mistake” to tear the sign down.
“I unreservedly apologise for removing the sign — it was a mistake,” he said.
“I believed the sign was illegally placed but I should have reported my concerns to council.”
Dr Ryan also apologised for the removal of the sign saying “it should not have happened”.
Mr Jordan, who was wearing a Teal T-shirt in the footage, refuses to reveal his identity when questioned in the video.
Asked if he is a “Monique Ryan supporter ripping down people’s signs” he says “no” and that he is “not acting on behalf of anyone”.
The person filming the video is seen trying to grab the sign back from Mr Jordan saying “you can take it off the property but it belongs to me”.
A Liberal Party spokesman said in incident exposed the hypocrisy of the Teals.
“The Teals preach integrity in public but then behave like this when they think no-one is looking,” he said.
“Regretfully this is not the first time we’ve seen this sort of behaviour.
“It’s disappointing that we now need to consider how to best keep our property and volunteers safe when Monique and her husband are around.”
Victorian Liberal Senator James Paterson demanded Dr Ryan front up and explain what happened rather than hide behind a statement, saying Mr Jordan’s behaviour was “totally inappropriate” and “inexcusable”.
Senator Paterson also raised concerns that this was “not the first instance of bad behaviour” from Dr Ryan’s campaign, following an ugly quarrel with teenage Liberal volunteers.
“She’s never accounted publicly for that behaviour or this sign theft, and this isn’t the first sign that’s gone missing,” he told Sky News on Monday.
“Dozens of Liberal Party signs in Kooyong have been defaced or vandalised, and have been stolen.
“Is this the first and only time her husband has taken upon himself to enforce council bylaws and remove a sign, or has he done it on other occasions?”
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50824
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22817632 (250925ZMAR25) Notable: Marles confirms just $1bn in Defence spending to be accelerated in federal budget - Labor will defy the Trump administration’s calls for a substantial boost to Australia’s military spending, sticking to its current funding trajectory in Tuesday’s federal budget while bringing forward $1bn for submarine and missile programs. The decision to leave the defence budget largely unchanged comes despite an estimated $4bn-a-year in lost purchasing power for Defence following years of high inflation, and the Coalition’s pledge to spend “much more” than Labor on new military capabilities. With a federal election set to be called within days, Richard Marles confirmed on Monday that the budget papers would show a $10.6bn increase in defence funding over the coming four years. The figure was already baked into the government’s long-term spending plan, and sees $5.3bn shift into the four-year forward estimates period from the government’s decade-long $50bn boost to defence spending. The Defence Minister said $1bn worth of funding would be “accelerated” to prepare for US and British submarine rotations out of Perth’s HMAS Stirling naval base, and speed up the establishment of a domestic guided weapons industry. He said the budget represented “the most significant increase in Defence spending in peacetime Australia since the end of the Second World War”. Yet the funding does not markedly alter the government’s current spending plans, which would see the Defence budget rise to about 2.33 per cent of GDP by 2033-24. One of the Trump administration’s picks for a key Pentagon policy role, Elbridge Colby, recently called for Australia to spend at least 3 per cent of GDP on defence, while warning that the US faced a “difficult problem” in meeting its AUKUS pledge to supply Australia with three Virginia-class submarines. Former Labor defence minister Kim Beazley has called on the Albanese government to meet the Trump administration’s demands, and Australian Industry Group chief executive Innes Willox says “the days of languid defence procurement must end immediately”.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>>/qresearch/22657835
>>>/qresearch/22706042
>>>/qresearch/22712493
Marles confirms just $1bn in Defence spending to be accelerated in federal budget
BEN PACKHAM - March 24, 2025
1/2
Labor will defy the Trump administration’s calls for a substantial boost to Australia’s military spending, sticking to its current funding trajectory in Tuesday’s federal budget while bringing forward $1bn for submarine and missile programs.
The decision to leave the defence budget largely unchanged comes despite an estimated $4bn-a-year in lost purchasing power for Defence following years of high inflation, and the Coalition’s pledge to spend “much more” than Labor on new military capabilities.
With a federal election set to be called within days, Richard Marles confirmed on Monday that the budget papers would show a $10.6bn increase in defence funding over the coming four years.
The figure was already baked into the government’s long-term spending plan, and sees $5.3bn shift into the four-year forward estimates period from the government’s decade-long $50bn boost to defence spending.
The Defence Minister said $1bn worth of funding would be “accelerated” to prepare for US and British submarine rotations out of Perth’s HMAS Stirling naval base, and speed up the establishment of a domestic guided weapons industry.
He said the budget represented “the most significant increase in Defence spending in peacetime Australia since the end of the Second World War”.
Yet the funding does not markedly alter the government’s current spending plans, which would see the Defence budget rise to about 2.33 per cent of GDP by 2033-24.
One of the Trump administration’s picks for a key Pentagon policy role, Elbridge Colby, recently called for Australia to spend at least 3 per cent of GDP on defence, while warning that the US faced a “difficult problem” in meeting its AUKUS pledge to supply Australia with three Virginia-class submarines.
Former Labor defence minister Kim Beazley has called on the Albanese government to meet the Trump administration’s demands, and Australian Industry Group chief executive Innes Willox says “the days of languid defence procurement must end immediately”.
Opposition defence spokesman Andrew Hastie, who has pledged a Coalition government would spend an extra $3bn on a fourth squadron of F-35 joint strike fighters worth an estimated $7.5bn, accused the government of playing “tricky politics” with the Defence budget.
“The Defence Minister simply confirmed the budget will have no new additional money for Defence,” he said.
“It is clear Richard Marles has once again lost out at the expenditure review committee table.”
Mr Marles said the government’s funding commitments stood “in stark contrast to what we saw when the Liberals were governing”, when the Defence budget contained insufficient funds to meet the government’s capability plans.
“What we know from the Defence Strategic Review is that in their final years in government, they were secretly cutting $20bn out of the Defence budget – that’s in black and white,” he said.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50825
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22817650 (250932ZMAR25) Notable: Aussie munitions firm to build $120m US weapons factory - Brisbane-based munitions firm NIOA will build a $120m weapons factory in the US amid growing calls by Donald Trump for Western countries to spend more on defence. NIOA is now the largest Australian-owned supplier of munitions to the Australian Defence Force after taking over Tennessee-based army sniper rifle supplier Barrett Firearms in 2022 for a reported $200m. The $US76.4m ($121.8m) industrial precinct in Murfreesboro, Tennessee, to be known as the Barrett Manufacturing & Technology Campus, will be capable of developing and testing an expanding range of weapons, including for the ADF. NIOA chief executive Rob Nioa said the company looked forward to the positive impact the project would have on the local economy and beyond. Barrett Firearms rose to prominence in the 1990s after supplying long-range rifles to the US military during Desert Storm. Founded in 1982, its first rifle was designed by Ronnie Barrett at his dining room table, before being used in a series of high-profile US operations. Barrett now supplies weapons to more than 70 countries around the world approved by the US State Department. The Barrett M107A1 anti-materiel sniper rifle is one of the weapons systems selected by the ADF under the LAND300 project aiming to ensure Australian ground forces maintain an advantage over potential adversaries beyond 2030. “This new facility will serve as our primary firearms manufacturing site globally, and demonstrates our commitment as a major American manufacturer catering to both the commercial and military markets,” Mr Nioa said.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>>/qresearch/22657835
>>>/qresearch/22706042
>>>/qresearch/22712493
Aussie munitions firm to build $120m US weapons factory
GLEN NORRIS - March 23, 2025
Brisbane-based munitions firm NIOA will build a $120m weapons factory in the US amid growing calls by Donald Trump for Western countries to spend more on defence.
NIOA is now the largest Australian-owned supplier of munitions to the Australian Defence Force after taking over Tennessee-based army sniper rifle supplier Barrett Firearms in 2022 for a reported $200m.
The $US76.4m ($121.8m) industrial precinct in Murfreesboro, Tennessee, to be known as the Barrett Manufacturing & Technology Campus, will be capable of developing and testing an expanding range of weapons, including for the ADF.
NIOA chief executive Rob Nioa said the company looked forward to the positive impact the project would have on the local economy and beyond.
Barrett Firearms rose to prominence in the 1990s after supplying long-range rifles to the US military during Desert Storm.
Founded in 1982, its first rifle was designed by Ronnie Barrett at his dining room table, before being used in a series of high-profile US operations. Barrett now supplies weapons to more than 70 countries around the world approved by the US State Department.
The Barrett M107A1 anti-materiel sniper rifle is one of the weapons systems selected by the ADF under the LAND300 project aiming to ensure Australian ground forces maintain an advantage over potential adversaries beyond 2030.
“This new facility will serve as our primary firearms manufacturing site globally, and demonstrates our commitment as a major American manufacturer catering to both the commercial and military markets,” Mr Nioa said.
Republican Tennessee Governor Bill Lee has lauded the investment by the Australian firm, noting his state had been “shaped by brands like Barrett that have made significant investments in our skilled workforce for decades”.
The investment by NIOA also comes as the Trump administration implements tariffs on a range of goods imported into the world’s largest economy in a move to boost the US manufacturing sector, including military industries.
At the same time, the US is pressuring allies including Australia to lift military spending, asking all NATO nations to increase their defence spending to 5 per cent of GDP.
Founded in 1973 in Maryborough, NIOA also has signed an agreement with US company L3Harris Aerojet Rocketdyne to explore the manufacture of critical guided weapons components to support domestic and allied missile production.
The Barrett factory, which will produce commercial firearms, military small arms and ammunition, will be constructed on a 70ha greenfield site close to Barrett’s current base.
The expansion will create close to 200 new jobs and enable the company to meet growing worldwide demand for its products. The facility is planned to open in early 2027.
Barrett chief executive Bryan James said the factory was a significant investment in the company’s growing capabilities for the future.
In a recent speech in Brisbane, Mr Nioa said Australia needed a stronger defence industry base which puts the interests of the ADF and Australia ahead of any other country. “Regardless of the outcome of the next federal election, the government of the day must act with urgency and mobilise our industrial base,” he said.
“Those of us in the defence sector hold to the view that contracts must start flowing soon to build on those policy foundations delivered by the government”, including AUKUS.
Australia, Britain and the US announced the landmark trilateral security agreement in 2021 with the centrepiece, known as Pillar One, being the delivery of nuclear-powered attack submarine capability to Australia.
Mr Nioa said Mr Trump wanted to put American enterprise back in the driving seat of the “country’s national security and prosperity”, which had big ramifications for Australia. “Big change can be exhilarating and maybe a bit scary, but here it comes,” he said.
Last year, NIOA launched a outpost in the heart of the US Army’s armaments development garrison in New Jersey as part of a push into the $US307bn defence sector.
The company’s office at Picatinny, which leads the development of conventional weapon systems and ammunition for the US military, will allow it to work more closely with America’s longstanding allies, particularly its AUKUS partners in the UK and Australia.
https://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/aussie-munitions-firm-to-build-120m-us-weapons-factory/news-story/b83d8d1d6b863c208011a8d34a36ca3a
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50826
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22817690 (251004ZMAR25) Notable: Monash law PhD students made to critique thesis based on Marxist, feminist, critical race theory - Students and academics have criticised Monash University’s PhD law course, which forces students to critique their thesis based on Marxist, feminist, critical race and queer theory, as one student claimed they were “expected” to include “critical law theory” in their black letter law thesis, and said the approach was “destroying legal academia”. It comes as Macquarie University’s vice-chancellor ordered a review of its law school practices after students said their course had become hijacked by a political ideology that was damaging to their education, with revelations law students faced the threat of failing one part of an exam if they performed an underwhelming acknowledgment of country. Monash PhD students are required to complete 120 hours of compulsory research skills training in part from “critical legal studies, international law and theory, feminism and philosophy”. The Australian understands Monash Law’s Critical Legal Studies looks at the relationship between law, power and politics. Lecture slides, seen by The Australian, note CLS is “concerned with theory” that includes “Marxism, postmodernism/poststructuralism; feminism; queer theory; critical race theory; critical disability theory”. Students are told to “note the intersections between these groupings”. At the end of the unit, The Australian believes, students are provided with a reflection task and asked to consider to what extent (if any) critical legal studies (or critical legal method) intersects with their research; and to reflect on the implications of these perspectives on thesis topics.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50803
>>50816
Monash law PhD students made to critique thesis based on Marxist, feminist, critical race theory
JANET ALBRECHTSEN and JOANNA PANAGOPOULOS - March 23, 2025
1/3
Students and academics have criticised Monash University’s PhD law course, which forces students to critique their thesis based on Marxist, feminist, critical race and queer theory, as one student claimed they were “expected” to include “critical law theory” in their black letter law thesis, and said the approach was “destroying legal academia”.
It comes as Macquarie University’s vice-chancellor ordered a review of its law school practices after students said their course had become hijacked by a political ideology that was damaging to their education, with revelations law students faced the threat of failing one part of an exam if they performed an underwhelming acknowledgment of country.
Monash PhD students are required to complete 120 hours of compulsory research skills training in part from “critical legal studies, international law and theory, feminism and philosophy”. The Australian understands Monash Law’s Critical Legal Studies looks at the relationship between law, power and politics.
Lecture slides, seen by The Australian, note CLS is “concerned with theory” that includes “Marxism, postmodernism/poststructuralism; feminism; queer theory; critical race theory; critical disability theory”. Students are told to “note the intersections between these groupings”.
At the end of the unit, The Australian believes, students are provided with a reflection task and asked to consider to what extent (if any) critical legal studies (or critical legal method) intersects with their research; and to reflect on the implications of these perspectives on thesis topics.
One student, who spoke on the condition of anonymity, said in the process of completing CLS, “it was made quite clear to me that you were … almost expected to include something like this in your thesis, regardless of what the topic was.”
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50827
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22817717 (251025ZMAR25) Notable: ‘Indigenise the curriculum’: University of Sydney begins hiring spree - The University of Sydney is on a hiring spree to “Indigenise the curriculum” over the next two years with multiple roles on offer to “decolonise” the sandstone institution’s course subjects, sparking fears of encroaching separatism within university halls. The Australian can reveal the nation’s oldest university last week started recruiting for a “Senior Education Design Officer” who would be responsible for “executing transformative curriculum projects aimed at embedding Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander knowledge, perspectives, texts, and media within curricular projects”. The two-year University of Sydney role was advertised with a base salary of $108,557 per annum. The officer would “provide expert guidance to stakeholders, primarily academic and teaching staff, to identify, scope, and plan multiple projects that align with university objectives to Indigenise the Curriculum”, the description read. They would “collaborate with the Indigenising Curriculum team to design and deliver relevant training to academics and teaching staff” and “seek and share knowledge on national and international cultural and pedagogical approaches to educational innovation and transformation”. The university also advertised a two-year $99,455 role for a project officer to play a “key role in Indigenising the curriculum” at the university. The university would give preference to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander applicants for both roles, the advertisements read.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50803
>>50816
>>50826
‘Indigenise the curriculum’: University of Sydney begins hiring spree
NOAH YIM - March 24, 2025
1/2
The University of Sydney is on a hiring spree to “Indigenise the curriculum” over the next two years with multiple roles on offer to “decolonise” the sandstone institution’s course subjects, sparking fears of encroaching separatism within university halls.
The Australian can reveal the nation’s oldest university last week started recruiting for a “Senior Education Design Officer” who would be responsible for “executing transformative curriculum projects aimed at embedding Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander knowledge, perspectives, texts, and media within curricular projects”.
It comes after it was uncovered that a law course at Macquarie University – now under review – was marking students on their ability to deliver an acknowledgement of country and were made to do a “privilege walk” as a class exercise.
The two-year University of Sydney role was advertised with a base salary of $108,557 per annum.
The officer would “provide expert guidance to stakeholders, primarily academic and teaching staff, to identify, scope, and plan multiple projects that align with university objectives to Indigenise the Curriculum”, the description read.
They would “collaborate with the Indigenising Curriculum team to design and deliver relevant training to academics and teaching staff” and “seek and share knowledge on national and international cultural and pedagogical approaches to educational innovation and transformation”.
The university also advertised a two-year $99,455 role for a project officer to play a “key role in Indigenising the curriculum” at the university.
The role would provide support “across a number of initiatives aimed at Indigenising and Decolonising Curricula”.
The university would give preference to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander applicants for both roles, the advertisements read.
Opposition Indigenous Australians spokeswoman Jacinta Nampijinpa Price accused the University of Sydney of trying to “ingrain separatist notions” and that all Australians should have access to high-quality education.
“This is yet another demonstration of inner-city elites entrenching ideas of separatism in our education system,” she said.
“The latest Closing the Gap data suggests that Indigenous Australians are still behind other Australians in year 12 completion rates, and that targets for Indigenous children to be developmentally on track are worsening.
“These are the issues that should take priority over ideological concerns like the decolonising of curricula.
“The Coalition is committed to ensuring our universities are focused on core academic instruction and research, and that all Australian children, regardless of heritage or racial background, have access to high-quality education that enables them to succeed and contribute meaningfully to society.
“The continued ideological push to ingrain separatist notions only serves to detract from those goals and is simply unjustifiable.”
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50828
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22823269 (260831ZMAR25) Notable: Joe Hockey goes in to bat for US investors in Trump trade dispute with Australia - A coal mining company and its disgruntled US investors have hired former ambassador turned lobbyist Joe Hockey to help them pursue millions of dollars in compensation from Australia in a high-profile case that has become a key point of contention in trade negotiations with the Trump administration. The claim stems from the cancellation in 2014 of a mining exploration licence in the NSW Hunter Valley held by NuCoal Resources following the Independent Commission Against Corruption’s investigation into disgraced former Labor minister Ian Macdonald. For a decade, NuCoal and its investors have sought compensation, with the Americans arguing the failure to compensate puts Australia in breach of its free trade agreement with the United States. This masthead can reveal that NuCoal chairman Gordon Galt and shareholders will travel to Washington next week to personally lobby the Trump administration, having retained the services of Hockey’s advisory and advocacy outfit, Bondi Partners. Frank Pfeffer, a now-retired investor who was instrumental in co-ordinating the US backers of NuCoal, said he would also attend the meetings. “He [Hockey] is involved as far as I can tell. We’re hoping that his contacts will help,” Pfeffer said. Galt said Hockey had made “very good suggestions”, as had other former politicians. Hockey declined to comment. Hockey was Australia’s ambassador to the US from 2016 to 2020 and established Bondi Partners after his stint at the embassy, leveraging relationships in both countries to “elevate trade and investment”. The firm has a presence in six cities, and its senior advisers include former Australian defence minister Marise Payne, former West Australian premier Mark McGowan, former Trump chief-of-staff Mick Mulvaney and former Democratic senator Joe Manchin.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50725
>>50785
Joe Hockey goes in to bat for US investors in Trump trade dispute with Australia
Michael Koziol - March 26, 2025
1/2
Washington: A coal mining company and its disgruntled US investors have hired former ambassador turned lobbyist Joe Hockey to help them pursue millions of dollars in compensation from Australia in a high-profile case that has become a key point of contention in trade negotiations with the Trump administration.
The claim stems from the cancellation in 2014 of a mining exploration licence in the NSW Hunter Valley held by NuCoal Resources following the Independent Commission Against Corruption’s investigation into disgraced former Labor minister Ian Macdonald.
For a decade, NuCoal and its investors have sought compensation, with the Americans arguing the failure to compensate puts Australia in breach of its free trade agreement with the United States.
This masthead can reveal that NuCoal chairman Gordon Galt and shareholders will travel to Washington next week to personally lobby the Trump administration, having retained the services of Hockey’s advisory and advocacy outfit, Bondi Partners.
Frank Pfeffer, a now-retired investor who was instrumental in co-ordinating the US backers of NuCoal, said he would also attend the meetings. “He [Hockey] is involved as far as I can tell. We’re hoping that his contacts will help,” Pfeffer said.
Galt said Hockey had made “very good suggestions”, as had other former politicians. Hockey declined to comment.
Hockey was Australia’s ambassador to the US from 2016 to 2020 and established Bondi Partners after his stint at the embassy, leveraging relationships in both countries to “elevate trade and investment”. The firm has a presence in six cities, and its senior advisers include former Australian defence minister Marise Payne, former West Australian premier Mark McGowan, former Trump chief-of-staff Mick Mulvaney and former Democratic senator Joe Manchin.
The Australian Financial Review reported on Tuesday that US trade representative Jamieson Greer raised the issue of compensating the US investors in NuCoal during a meeting with Australian Trade Minister Don Farrell last weekend.
The issue is also one of several grievances with Australia that are consistently listed in the trade representative’s annual report on foreign trade barriers.
Those involved in the push argue that Australia would benefit in trade negotiations if it agreed to compensate the investors, giving Trump an easy win and showing the Australian government was prepared to compromise.
They also argue NuCoal’s investors, including thousands of American “mum and dads”, did nothing wrong and deserve compensation as they were collateral damage from Macdonald’s earlier corrupt actions.
Farrell declined to comment. However, the federal and NSW governments believe Australia has complied with its obligations under the free trade agreement.
NSW Premier Chris Minns has suggested the total compensation bill could be more than $500 million. “I don’t know where I would get half a billion dollars; it would have to come from schools and hospitals,” he told 2GB radio in March last year.
Asked about the matter last week, the NSW government reiterated it would not establish any compensation scheme for people claiming to have suffered losses as a result of the O’Farrell government’s 2014 decision.
“The former NSW Coalition government legislated against compensation and did not change position during its 12 years in office,” a NSW government spokesperson said.
“Under the former federal Coalition government, it was determined that American investors in NuCoal did not have a right to bring an investment arbitration claim against Australia under [the] Australia-US Free Trade Agreement.”
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50829
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22823308 (260904ZMAR25) Notable: Musk steps up war with Australia’s eSafety Commissioner - Elon Musk’s X Corp has intensified its fight with Australia’s eSafety Commissioner, seeking to overturn a two-year-old, six-figure fine from the watchdog. eSafety Commissioner Julie Inman Grant fined X Corp, formerly known as Twitter, $610,500 in late 2023, after the social media giant missed the deadline to say how it was combating child sexual exploitation and abuse on its platform. But X Corp has argued in the Federal Court on Wednesday that it shouldn’t have to pay the fine because it was levied at Twitter, which no longer exists. Mr Musk bought Twitter for $US44bn in October 2022 and rebadged it X in July 2023 - two months before the eSafety commissioner fined the company. It is the second time X has tried to overturn the fine. Last year it argued the fine was issued to Twitter, not X, and it therefore shouldn’t have to pay up. Justice Michael Wheelahan dismissed that argument. But on Wednesday X Corp’s barrister, Bret Walker SC, said Justice Wheelahan made a mistake, and the eSafety commissioner should have issued a new notice to X given Twitter had “ceased to exist”. Mr Walker argued that while under US law X assumed the “liabilities and benefits” of the previous entity, this could not be extended to the unexpired period for that entity “to do something in compliance with a reporting process”. The eSafety Commissioner’s barrister Stephen Lloyd rejected Mr Walker’s argument, saying the notice to comply continued over to the new entity. Ms Inman Grant declined to comment on Wednesday but said last year that if X was successful in overturning the fine, it could “set the concerning precedent that a foreign company’s merger with another foreign company might enable it to avoid regulatory obligations in Australia”.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50815
Musk steps up war with Australia’s eSafety Commissioner
JARED LYNCH - 26 March 2025
Elon Musk’s X Corp has intensified its fight with Australia’s eSafety Commissioner, seeking to overturn a two-year-old, six-figure fine from the watchdog.
eSafety Commissioner Julie Inman Grant fined X Corp, formerly known as Twitter, $610,500 in late 2023, after the social media giant missed the deadline to say how it was combating child sexual exploitation and abuse on its platform.
But X Corp has argued in the Federal Court on Wednesday that it shouldn’t have to pay the fine because it was levied at Twitter, which no longer exists.
Mr Musk bought Twitter for $US44bn in October 2022 and rebadged it X in July 2023 – two months before the eSafety commissioner fined the company.
It is the second time X has tried to overturn the fine. Last year it argued the fine was issued to Twitter, not X, and it therefore shouldn’t have to pay up. Justice Michael Wheelahan dismissed that argument.
But on Wednesday X Corp’s barrister, Bret Walker SC, said Justice Wheelahan made a mistake, and the eSafety commissioner should have issued a new notice to X given Twitter had “ceased to exist”.
Mr Walker argued that while under US law X assumed the “liabilities and benefits” of the previous entity, this could not be extended to the unexpired period for that entity “to do something in compliance with a reporting process”.
The eSafety Commissioner’s barrister Stephen Lloyd rejected Mr Walker’s argument, saying the notice to comply continued over to the new entity.
Ms Inman Grant declined to comment on Wednesday but said last year that if X was successful in overturning the fine, it could “set the concerning precedent that a foreign company’s merger with another foreign company might enable it to avoid regulatory obligations in Australia”.
“eSafety remains committed to exercising provisions available under the Online Safety Act to hold all tech companies to account without fear or favour, ensuring they comply with the laws of Australia and prioritise the safety and wellbeing of all Australians,” Ms Inman Grant said.
Mr Musk, the world’s richest person, has been critical of the eSafety Commissioner and the Australian government.
The Tesla chief executive and SpaceX founder accused the Albanese government for being “fascists” in relation to the misinformation bill.
Mr Musk also has called Ms Inman Grant the “censorship commissar” over her attempt to force X to take down a video of a stabbing at a Sydney church not just in Australia but across the world last year. Ms Inman Grant later abandoned that fight.
The billionaire – who is one of Donald Trump’s biggest backers and has an influential role in the White House – said the Albanese government was creating “a backdoor wall to control access to the internet by all Australians” after it banned children accessing social media, and is now part of a group accusing Australia of “unfair trade practices”.
The Computer & Communications Industry Association – which represents the interests of Mr Musk, Meta founder Mark Zuckerberg and other US tech titans – lodged a 45-page submission this month taking aim at Australia, among other nations.
It accused Australia of unfairly targeting them through the News Media Bargaining Code that requires them to pay for local Australian news content.
https://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/technology/musk-steps-up-war-with-australias-censorship-commissar/news-story/baa3020a093c08360306dfd9c2e68385
https://www.comcourts.gov.au/file/Federal/P/VID1186/2024/actions
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50830
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22828371 (270940ZMAR25) Notable: Albanese planning to call election for May 3 on Friday - Prime Minister Anthony Albanese is planning to call the federal election on Friday morning, naming May 3 as the date for Australians to cast their votes amid a policy fight over the Coalition’s decision to oppose the personal tax cuts in this week’s federal budget. The move draws attention away from Opposition Leader Peter Dutton’s crucial economic pitch to voters in his budget reply speech on Thursday evening, when he is expected to unveil more help for households without matching the Labor tax cut. Several sources familiar with the prime minister’s thinking said he intended to visit Governor-General Sam Mostyn at Government House in Canberra on Friday morning. The sources, unauthorised to speak to the media, emphasised that the plan was subject to change as it had been earlier this month, when Cyclone Alfred threatened the Queensland coast and forced Albanese to postpone an election that had been pencilled in for April 12. Calling the election on Friday morning would steal attention from news coverage of Dutton’s Thursday night budget-in-reply address, where the opposition leader could reveal policies on housing, gas supply and migration. But the Coalition has already released its plan to slash fuel excise for a year, giving it days of prominence. Albanese, who has become buoyant in private about the election, has told confidantes the idea of forcing voters to endure a six-week campaign was “bullshit”, making a five-week campaign before a May 3 poll the most likely option. The latest he could call an election for that date is Monday, the day after he is scheduled to appear on the ABC’s Insiders program.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50708
>>50755
Albanese planning to call election for May 3 on Friday
James Massola and Paul Sakkal - March 27, 2025
Prime Minister Anthony Albanese is planning to call the federal election on Friday morning, naming May 3 as the date for Australians to cast their votes amid a policy fight over the Coalition’s decision to oppose the personal tax cuts in this week’s federal budget.
The move draws attention away from Opposition Leader Peter Dutton’s crucial economic pitch to voters in his budget reply speech on Thursday evening, when he is expected to unveil more help for households without matching the Labor tax cut.
Several sources familiar with the prime minister’s thinking said he intended to visit Governor-General Sam Mostyn at Government House in Canberra on Friday morning.
The sources, unauthorised to speak to the media, emphasised that the plan was subject to change as it had been earlier this month, when Cyclone Alfred threatened the Queensland coast and forced Albanese to postpone an election that had been pencilled in for April 12.
Calling the election on Friday morning would steal attention from news coverage of Dutton’s Thursday night budget-in-reply address, where the opposition leader could reveal policies on housing, gas supply and migration. But the Coalition has already released its plan to slash fuel excise for a year, giving it days of prominence.
Albanese, who has become buoyant in private about the election, has told confidantes the idea of forcing voters to endure a six-week campaign was “bullshit”, making a five-week campaign before a May 3 poll the most likely option. The latest he could call an election for that date is Monday, the day after he is scheduled to appear on the ABC’s Insiders program.
The Coalition needs about 20 seats to win a majority and make the Albanese government the first one-term administration since 1932.
One senior Labor cabinet minister said that Albanese had emphasised what he views as the government’s strong position in the polls. “If we are on 50-50 at the start of the campaign, that’s potentially an election-winning [majority] for a government,” the source recalled Albanese saying.
“We think there is a chance the wheels will fall off completely for them,” the Labor source said. “They have nothing out there as policy besides nuclear power and free lunches and they’re doing nothing to expand their base.”
Albanese said on Triple M Hobart on Thursday morning that he would announce the election date “pretty imminently”. Adding further weight to the call coming on Friday, the prime minister’s department on Thursday accidentally posted on social media that the government was in caretaker mode, despite the House of Representatives sitting at the time.
The post was quickly deleted, but not before Sky News captured a screenshot. PM&C apologised for the error.
The Coalition on Wednesday voted against Labor’s $5-a-week tax cut in the House of Representatives, opening a fight on economic management and shifting focus from Labor’s recent healthcare policy announcements.
“We absolutely would repeal it,” shadow treasurer Angus Taylor said of the tax cut on ABC Radio National.
The Coalition will offer to halve the fuel excise as a more immediate form of cost-of-living relief, a policy that has been rated as popular in Liberal focus groups this week, particularly in the outer suburbs.
The year-long measure would cost $6 billion and the Coalition predicted it would save a family with one vehicle around $14 a week.
Dutton remains calm about his election prospects, according to people familiar with his thinking, despite a rocky few weeks. He and Taylor are considering announcing their own tax cuts during the election campaign, sources said on Wednesday.
Internal and public polling has shown a slight improvement for Labor in recent weeks as the Coalition has come under pressure over its thin policy agenda. Victoria continues to trend away from Labor due to an unpopular state government. The Coalition requires a big seat haul of up to eight seats in Victoria, a state in which it holds few seats, because Labor’s vote is holding up in other states such as Western Australia, South Australia and Tasmania.
After enduring a torrid time at the hands of Queensland voters in the decade and a half since Kevin Rudd was elected in 2007, Labor sources hoped to secure a handful of unlikely gains in Dutton’s home state. Coalition sources rubbished those predictions.
https://www.smh.com.au/politics/federal/albanese-planning-to-call-the-election-on-friday-20250327-p5lmw2.html
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50831
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22828385 (270948ZMAR25) Notable: Apple celebrates Aboriginal culture in Maps update, showcasing traditional names and lands - Apple Maps now displays traditional Aboriginal names for places across Australia, joining companies such as Qantas and Australia Post in celebrating indigenous heritage, as part of its biggest overhaul of the popular app. The Maps update has been a four-year project, with Apple saying it has only scratched the surface in highlighting how technology can help preserve culture and enhance education. The tech titan has worked with indigenous advisers, cartographers, traditional owners, language holders, and community members to complete the automatic upgrade, which went live on Thursday afternoon. Indigenous groups can also submit pictures of their local communities to create place cards to generate further awareness, and a similar update has been launched in New Zealand. Apple says its goal to build the world’s best map, with Google its main competitor. Both companies have also adopted dual names for the Gulf of Mexico, following Donald Trump’s executive order to rename it the Gulf of America. The Aboriginal titles also brings Australia in line with the US and Canada, where Apple has also displayed indigenous place names.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>>/qresearch/22482279 (pb)
>>50714
>>50803
Apple celebrates Aboriginal culture in Maps update, showcasing traditional names and lands
JARED LYNCH - 27 March 2025
1/2
Apple Maps now displays traditional Aboriginal names for places across Australia, joining companies such as Qantas and Australia Post in celebrating indigenous heritage, as part of its biggest overhaul of the popular app.
The Maps update has been a four-year project, with Apple saying it has only scratched the surface in highlighting how technology can help preserve culture and enhance education.
The tech titan has worked with indigenous advisers, cartographers, traditional owners, language holders, and community members to complete the automatic upgrade, which went live on Thursday afternoon.
Indigenous groups can also submit pictures of their local communities to create place cards to generate further awareness, and a similar update has been launched in New Zealand.
Apple says its goal to build the world’s best map, with Google its main competitor. Both companies have also adopted dual names for the the Gulf of Mexico, following Donald Trump’s executive order to rename it the Gulf of America.
The Aboriginal titles also brings Australia in line with the US and Canada, where Apple has also displayed indigenous place names.
Like the maps that feature in many Qantas lounges, Apple sourced data from the Australian Institute of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Studies. But unlike those maps, Apple chose not to show defined borders of traditional nations – only the names over the respective general areas - given some are contentious.
Instead, borders are only shown on protected areas and Aboriginal land trusts. It also shows dual titles only where traditional names have been officially adopted. For instance, Sydney Cove is also displayed as Warrane and Mount Wellington in Hobart is also called Kunanyi, but Melbourne does not have Naarm – the city’s traditional indigenous name – shown alongside it.
But if someone types in Naarm to Maps, it will display Melbourne.
Sydney appears to have the most dual titles in the upgrade, with Lavender Bay, Farm Cove and Campbells Cove also called Gooweebahree, Wahganmuggalee and Meeliyahwool respectively. The city is labelled as being part of the Eora Nation.
Apple has also displayed the variety of spellings for traditional place names to help prevent confusion.
Indigenous lands will also be displayed in other apps like Weather and Find My, as well as in third-party apps that use MapKit – Apple’s platform that allows developers to integrate interactive maps, geolocation, and navigation features into their programs.
It comes after most of Australia’s 20 biggest companies – including BHP, the big four banks, Telstra and Woolworths – backed the Yes campaign in the Indigenous Voice referendum in late 2023. Despite the corporate support, more than 60 per cent of Australians rejected the proposal.
But negotiations began last November for Australia’s first treaty between the Victorian government and the group tasked with representing the state’s First Peoples.
Victorian Premier Jacinta Allan said: “Treaty is our opportunity at this point in our history to reset the relationship between the state of Victoria and the First Peoples of Victoria”.
“We know that we need to get better outcomes, and we know the outcomes right now are not fair, they’re not equal. Because throughout history, since colonisation, First Peoples in this state have been excluded from opportunity.”
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50832
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22828399 (271001ZMAR25) Notable: US conspiracy theorist Donald Day Jnr tells authorities he feels 'responsible' for death of Wieambilla killers - The US conspiracy theorist charged in connection with a deadly attack on Queensland police has told authorities he would have tried to talk the killers out of it if he had the chance. Arizona man Donald Day Jr had forged a strong online friendship with Gareth and Stacey Train before they shot police dead in a six-hour siege at their rural Wieambilla property in 2022. After ambushing officers with a hail of bullets, the couple shared one final chilling video message which appeared to address Mr Day directly. In the YouTube clip, a quietly spoken Stacey Train told "Don" they would "be home soon" and that they loved him. In a summary of Mr Day's police interview, filed to a US court this week, he told officers he was emotional after seeing the video. He said that if he had known what was going to happen, he would have told the Trains not to kill the officers as he wanted them to come to the United States. Mr Day admitted that he felt responsible for what happened to the Trains and for telling them he would have killed the "devils" and "demons" if they had come to his home. "I totally felt responsible for that … because I didn't want to see my friends get killed like that," he told police. When agents read comments he made to the Trains before the shooting that he would "kill them all because they are monsters and demons in the flesh", he answered: "Yes, I would." He also accepted police were "probably right" when they suggested he had led the Trains to a violent end. Two police officers, Constables Rachel McCrow and Matthew Arnold, and a neighbour, Alan Dare, were killed in the shooting, which Australian police labelled a religiously motivated terror attack. The young constables had been attempting to perform a welfare check on Gareth's brother, Nathaniel, when they were killed. The shooters, Gareth, Stacey and Nathaniel Train, were later shot dead on the rural property by Queensland police officers. Mr Day now faces a total of five federal charges in the US - three relating to alleged threats made online, and two accusing him of violating firearms laws.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
US conspiracy theorist Donald Day Jnr tells authorities he feels 'responsible' for death of Wieambilla killers
Eden Gillespie - 27 March 2025
The US conspiracy theorist charged in connection with a deadly attack on Queensland police has told authorities he would have tried to talk the killers out of it if he had the chance.
Arizona man Donald Day Jr had forged a strong online friendship with Gareth and Stacey Train before they shot police dead in a six-hour siege at their rural Wieambilla property in 2022.
After ambushing officers with a hail of bullets, the couple shared one final chilling video message which appeared to address Mr Day directly.
In the YouTube clip, a quietly spoken Stacey Train told "Don" they would "be home soon" and that they loved him.
In a summary of Mr Day's police interview, filed to a US court this week, he told officers he was emotional after seeing the video.
He said that if he had known what was going to happen, he would have told the Trains not to kill the officers as he wanted them to come to the United States.
Mr Day admitted that he felt responsible for what happened to the Trains and for telling them he would have killed the "devils" and "demons" if they had come to his home.
"I totally felt responsible for that … because I didn't want to see my friends get killed like that," he told police.
When agents read comments he made to the Trains before the shooting that he would "kill them all because they are monsters and demons in the flesh", he answered: "Yes, I would."
He also accepted police were "probably right" when they suggested he had led the Trains to a violent end.
Two police officers, Constables Rachel McCrow and Matthew Arnold, and a neighbour, Alan Dare, were killed in the shooting, which Australian police labelled a religiously motivated terror attack.
The young constables had been attempting to perform a welfare check on Gareth's brother, Nathaniel, when they were killed.
The shooters, Gareth, Stacey and Nathaniel Train, were later shot dead on the rural property by Queensland police officers.
Mr Day now faces a total of five federal charges in the US — three relating to alleged threats made online, and two accusing him of violating firearms laws.
Day told police 'I wish I was there with them'
In his police interview, Mr Day said he spoke with the Trains two to four times a week in the comment section of their videos and loved the couple as they were "children of God".
He said they shared a belief that the evils of the world were perpetuated by police.
He went on to claim he never encouraged them to respond the way they did, despite also telling authorities he wished he had "been there to kill those f*ckers with them".
Mr Day told police the Trains were demonised by Australian police when they attempted to report sex trafficking, and likened them to cornered animals.
"Look, okay, I need to calm down for just a second because they murdered my friends. I think about them every single day, what they did," he said.
"I wish I had been there with them to kill those f*ckers with them. So that they weren't alone. I know what it means to be alone."
Mr Day was reported to have referenced Waco — a bloody siege between FBI agents and a religious group — when asked about comments he made to the Trains that enemies only understand the language of violence.
Threats against head of World Health Organization
Mr Day said that he did not have a bank account, credit cards, a birth certificate, or social security card.
He told police he had not permitted his wife, Sabrina Spires, to leave their farm for the past three years as the world is "so f*cking evil" and the pair shared a phone.
When told he was prohibited from owning firearms, he appeared to reference baseless sovereign citizen beliefs, telling police they were operating under maritime law instead of constitutional law.
"Who are you, or anybody else to tell me that I can't be armed, to protect myself, to defend my family? Who are you? The law?" he said.
He also accepted he had made a comment about the director general of the World Health Organization needing to be killed, and told police if Bill Gates or Hillary Clinton were in the room with him, they wouldn't walk out alive.
"Evil people need to die. They won't stop," he said.
Mr Day is expected to face trial in April.
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-03-27/donald-day-wieambilla-queensland-shooting-police-interview/105099120
https://qresear.ch/?q=Donald+Day
https://qresear.ch/?q=Wieambilla
https://qresear.ch/?q=Gareth+Train
https://qresear.ch/?q=Stacey+Train
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50833
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22836159 (290056ZMAR25) Notable: Election 2025: Peter Dutton moves to calm his anxious troops after bumpy campaign start - Peter Dutton has sought to rally Coalition MPs nervous about the party’s performance and the drop in the Opposition Leader’s personal approval ratings, assuring those worried that the Coalition had not convinced voters of its message that “You haven’t seen anything yet”. The Australian on Monday revealed internal concerns over the performance of the Coalition, with MPs admitting they believed the party was still lacking solid economic policies while former deputy prime minister Michael McCormack said it was clear there was “a lot of work to do” before May 3. Mr Dutton on Tuesday hit back at suggestions his campaign had not started off well, declaring it was too early to make any judgment on the Coalition’s performance. “I don’t think you’ve seen anything yet - wait until we get into this campaign and you will see more of what we’ve got to offer,” the Liberal leader said when confronted with the critiques from within his own party. “I will lead a team into the next election, which is experienced and which has the ability not just to clean up Labor’s mess, but to implement our positive plan.”
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50708
>>50755
Prime Minister Anthony Albanese calls federal election for May 3
Daniel Jeffrey and Adam Vidler - Mar 28, 2025
Anthony Albanese has called the federal election for May 3, ending months of speculation about when Australians will head to the polls.
Both major parties have been in campaigning mode for most of the year already, but the prime minister today visited Governor-General Samantha Mostyn to request the election, kicking off the official campaign.
The call of the election comes just days after the government handed down the federal budget.
It also comes the morning after opposition leader Peter Dutton's budget reply speech on Thursday night, in what analysts have said was an attempt to overshadow it.
"Over the last few years, the world has thrown a lot at Australia," Albanese said this morning.
"In uncertain times, we cannot decide the challenges that we will face, but we can determine how we respond."
Albanese emphasised the Labor Party's focus on Medicare and cost of living, including energy bill relief and childcare support.
"At this election, I'm asking for the support of the Australian people to keep building on the hard work that we have done and the strong foundations that we have laid," he said.
He also addressed the possibility for disinformation and misinformation around the campaign, following a large-scale abandonment of fact-checking by social media companies, along with allegations of election interference around the world.
"Anyone who tries that, I say back off," he said.
"We have an extraordinary capacity to look after our nation."
Central to the budget was the so-called "top-up" tax cuts scheduled to come into effect from July 1 next year should Labor win the May 3 vote, which the government has heavily criticised the Coalition for voting against.
In response, Dutton has pledged to halve the fuel excise for 12 months should the Liberals and Nationals claim government.
Labor currently holds 77 seats in the House of Representatives to the opposition's 53.
Polls in the first two months of the year indicated significant two-party-preferred swings towards the Coalition, putting Labor at risk of becoming the first Australian government to be removed from power after just one term since 1931.
However, Albanese has been boosted by an apparent turn of fortune in recent weeks, with the government performing better in opinion polls than it was at the start of the year.
Nonetheless, a hung parliament remains a distinct possibility. Albanese said this morning he intends to lead a "majority government" and serve a full term if re-elected as prime minister.
He also echoed the main theme reverberating through Treasurer Jim Chalmers' budget speech on Tuesday - that while Australia had "turned a corner", there was more work to do.
Dutton has not yet responded to the election announcement personally, but the Liberal Party's official Instagram page posted an image simply stating "It's on".
"On May 3rd, you can vote to get Australia back on track," the caption read.
The Trump factor
The shadow of US President Donald Trump is already looming large over the nascent campaign, with neither candidate apparently keen to openly criticise or openly mimic the controversial world leader.
A new round of tariffs is expected on April 2, which it's feared may target major Australian exports such as beef and pharmaceuticals.
Albanese earlier this year spoke with Trump about a potential exemption for tariffs on Australian steel and aluminium, which the president promised to consider, but which failed to eventuate.
"We have been engaging on a daily basis with the (Trump) administration," Albanese said this morning.
"I received another briefing this morning and we'll continue to engage constructively in Australia's national interest."
Albanese said the current government had a constructive and open relationship with the White House.
Both Albanese and Dutton have pledged to defend the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme if it becomes a target of US policy, with major pharma giants in the US urging Trump to take action on what they regard as obstructive trade barriers that allow Australians access to cheaper medicine.
https://www.9news.com.au/national/federal-election-2025-date-called-anthony-albanese-labor-peter-dutton-coalition/2700f0fb-7acf-4fa7-a0c9-142dc12ad0a9
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vtktcEg8aEQ
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50834
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22836210 (290107ZMAR25) Notable: Video: Australia PM Albanese calls national election for May 3 - Australia's Prime Minister Anthony Albanese on Friday called a national election for May 3, launching a five-week campaign that is set to be dominated by cost-of-living pressures. Albanese's Labor party won a majority at the last federal election in 2022, but most recent opinion polls show the party neck-and-neck with the opposition Liberal-National coalition when votes from smaller parties are redistributed. "Our government has chosen to face global challenges the Australian way - helping people under cost-of-living pressure, while building for the future," he told a press conference. "Because of the strength and resilience that our people have shown, Australia is turning the corner. Now on 3 May, you choose the way forward." Albanese earlier in the morning met the country's Governor-General Sam Mostyn to seek permission to formally call the election, as required by Australia's constitution. The governor-general represents Australia's head of state, Britain's King Charles. Albanese has announced a slew of measures aimed at pleasing families and businesses in recent months, including tax cuts in Tuesday's budget, with the rising cost of living in the country set to dominate the campaign.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50833
Australia PM Albanese calls national election for May 3
Alasdair Pal, Renju Jose and Kirsty Needham - March 28, 2025
SYDNEY, March 28 (Reuters) - Australia's Prime Minister Anthony Albanese on Friday called a national election for May 3, launching a five-week campaign that is set to be dominated by cost-of-living pressures.
Albanese's Labor party won a majority at the last federal election in 2022, but most recent opinion polls show the party neck-and-neck with the opposition Liberal-National coalition when votes from smaller parties are redistributed.
"Our government has chosen to face global challenges the Australian way - helping people under cost-of-living pressure, while building for the future," he told a press conference. "Because of the strength and resilience that our people have shown, Australia is turning the corner. Now on 3 May, you choose the way forward."
Albanese earlier in the morning met the country's Governor-General Sam Mostyn to seek permission to formally call the election, as required by Australia's constitution. The governor-general represents Australia's head of state, Britain's King Charles.
TIGHT CAMPAIGN
Albanese has announced a slew of measures aimed at pleasing families and businesses in recent months, including tax cuts in Tuesday's budget, with the rising cost of living in the country set to dominate the campaign.
On Friday, Albanese focused his campaign attack on the opposition Liberal and National coalition, saying it would axe government programmes and revoke modest new tax cuts passed by parliament.
A close-run election could mean no single party or coalition of parties will be able to form a government on its own, instead relying on smaller parties and independents to command a majority in the country's lower house.
Albanese, a long-time Labor lawmaker who grew up in government housing, has suffered from waning popularity as living costs and interest rates rose steeply during his tenure.
Falling inflation and the decision by Australia's central bank to cut interest rates for the first time in five years at its February meeting have done little to help Albanese's polling numbers.
After enjoying a healthy lead for much of his term, his personal approval ratings are now close to those of Liberal leader Peter Dutton, a former police officer and the defence minister in the last Liberal-National government.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50835
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22836262 (290118ZMAR25) Notable: Video Analysis: 2025 Australian election breakdown - Sky News Chief Election Analyst Tom Connell breaks down the upcoming federal election campaign and the “crucial” performance of the Greens and independents. This comes after Prime Minister Anthony Albanese called the election on Friday, announcing Australians will be voting on May 3. “We know of course how the Greens and independents perform will be crucial to the outcome of this election,” Mr Connell said. “Their number grew from six to 16 last time around. “Simply put, if that number is as high or higher it’s almost certain that Australia will have its first hung parliament since 2010.”
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50833
Analysis: 2025 Australian election breakdown
Sky News Australia
Mar 28, 2025
Sky News Chief Election Analyst Tom Connell breaks down the upcoming federal election campaign and the “crucial” performance of the Greens and independents.
This comes after Prime Minister Anthony Albanese called the election on Friday, announcing Australians will be voting on May 3.
“We know of course how the Greens and independents perform will be crucial to the outcome of this election,” Mr Connell said.
“Their number grew from six to 16 last time around.
“Simply put, if that number is as high or higher it’s almost certain that Australia will have its first hung parliament since 2010.”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=znPs1FACtNg
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50836
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22836338 (290135ZMAR25) Notable: Peter Dutton faces a 22-seat gain target to win election - Peter Dutton’s challenge to become prime minister of a majority Coalition government in the 48th parliament is monumental, requiring a net gain of 22 seats. The Opposition Leader needs a bigger seat gain than Scott Morrison’s seat loss in 2022. The Coalition went into the last election with a notional 75 seats and recorded a net loss of 17, finishing with 58 MPs in parliament. A by-election defeat and defections have since whittled that number down to 54 seats for the 2025 election - 22 short of the slimmest majority possible in the next 150-seat parliament. The task for Labor and Anthony Albanese looks less complicated: hold the line and they’re home. Yet in the current political climate, the government also faces a challenge to retain majority government. Starting the campaign with a notional 78 seats, Labor can afford only a net loss of up to two seats to hold on to power in its own right.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50833
Peter Dutton faces a 22-seat gain target to win election
Peter Dutton’s challenge to become PM in the 48th parliament is monumental, requiring a net gain of 22 seats.
DAVID TANNER - March 28, 2025
1/2
Peter Dutton’s challenge to become prime minister of a majority Coalition government in the 48th parliament is monumental, requiring a net gain of 22 seats.
The Opposition Leader needs a bigger seat gain than Scott Morrison’s seat loss in 2022.
The Coalition went into the last election with a notional 75 seats and recorded a net loss of 17, finishing with 58 MPs in parliament.
A by-election defeat and defections have since whittled that number down to 54 seats for the 2025 election – 22 short of the slimmest majority possible in the next 150-seat parliament.
The task for Labor and Anthony Albanese looks less complicated: hold the line and they’re home. Yet in the current political climate, the government also faces a challenge to retain majority government.
Starting the campaign with a notional 78 seats, Labor can afford only a net loss of up to two seats to hold on to power in its own right.
To put Dutton’s task in context, he would need a political landscape-changing result in the Kevin ’07 realm.
Kevin Rudd, the previous major party leader from Queensland, albeit on the other side of politics, romped to power with a net gain of 23 seats – but the former Griffith MP went into the election with Labor holding 60 seats, six more than Dutton does now, and he finished with a majority of eight seats.
John Howard did even better in 1996, with a net gain of 29 seats to end 13 years of Labor rule but the Liberal leader was even closer to the target than Rudd, with the Coalition holding 65 seats before the election and needing a net gain of only 11 seats.
And in 2013, the Coalition improved its position by 18 seats, leaving Tony Abbott with a healthy majority, given he needed only four more seats to claim government.
Dutton’s 22-seat net gain task is just to fall over the line and hold the slimmest of majorities.
The 2025 election is complicated by many factors, not least the mammoth crossbench of 18 MPs, as well as redistribution in three states – NSW, Victoria and Western Australia – that have reduced the number of seats from 151 to 150.
Can Dutton’s 2025 candidates win any seats back?
The Liberal Party surrendered six seats to teal independents and two more to the Greens in 2022.
One of the biggest questions is whether Dutton’s 2025 candidates can prise back any of those seats.
To complicate matters, what would have been one of the more likely seats for the Liberals to reclaim – North Sydney, won three years ago by teal Kylea Tink – is off the table having been abolished in the NSW redistribution.
The Liberals have also had three seats shift to the crossbench during the 47th parliament, with the defections of Liberal Russell Broadbent in Monash in eastern Victoria, Andrew Gee of the Nationals in Calare in central NSW and another Liberal, Ian Goodenough, in Moore, WA.
All are recontesting their seats as independents.
Incumbent crossbenchers can be frustratingly difficult for major parties to unseat.
Just ask all those who have tried and failed to knock off Bob Katter in Kennedy in Queensland’s northwest at the past eight elections since 2001, Andrew Wilkie (Denison/Clark, Tasmania) or Adam Bandt (Melbourne, Victoria) since 2013, Cathy McGowan and then her anointed successor Helen Haines (Indi, Victoria) since 2016 or Rebekha Sharkie (Mayo, SA) since 2019.
In a hypothetical scenario where the Coalition is unable to pick up any of the 10 crossbench seats it has lost over the past three years – and doesn’t lose another blue-ribbon seat in Bradfield to the teals – that would leave Dutton needing to pick up all 22 seats from Labor.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50837
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22836473 (290201ZMAR25) Notable: Anthony Albanese ramps up attacks on Peter Dutton, launches scare campaign - Anthony Albanese has launched a major scare campaign tying Peter Dutton to US President Donald Trump’s welfare cuts and public servant sackings, as he promises to serve a full term if re-elected and refuses to say if Australians will see modelling on how a second-term Labor agenda will impact power prices. The Prime Minister opened the 2025 federal election in Canberra with a pitch to “build Australia’s future” and ease the cost-of-living crisis with his sweep of $5 a week tax cuts, billions for Medicare bulk-billing and energy bill relief. Within the first week, Mr Albanese will face the headwinds of Mr Trump’s “Liberation Day” of mass global tariffs and a Reserve Bank board meeting where interest rates will likely be held. But after visiting Governor-General Sam Mostyn early on Friday to drown out the Opposition Leader’s budget-in-reply speech the previous night, Mr Albanese focused his press conference on his attempt to paint Mr Dutton as a politician who would “cut” and “wreck’ if he wins on May 3. “Everything in Peter Dutton’s record tells us that he will start by cutting Medicare and he won’t stop there,” Mr Albanese said in Canberra. “He will cut everything except your taxes. No-one will get any power from the Liberals’ nuclear reactors for two decades but every Australian will get the bill right away because when Peter Dutton cuts, Australians pay.” He went to slam the Coalition for its pledge to cut 41,000 public servants, saying it was not “the Australian way” and made the connection between Mr Dutton’s policy and Mr Trump’s attempts to slash the Washington bureaucracy. Well, people will make their own judgments of course but people will have a look at the mass sackings of public servants (in the US),” Mr Albanese said.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50785
>>50833
Anthony Albanese ramps up attacks on Peter Dutton, launches scare campaign
NOAH YIM and RICHARD FERGUSON - March 28, 2025
1/2
Anthony Albanese has launched a major scare campaign tying Peter Dutton to US President Donald Trump’s welfare cuts and public servant sackings, as he promises to serve a full term if re-elected and refuses to say if Australians will see modelling on how a second-term Labor agenda will impact power prices.
The Prime Minister opened the 2025 federal election in Canberra with a pitch to “build Australia’s future” and ease the cost-of-living crisis with his sweep of $5 a week tax cuts, billions for Medicare bulk-billing and energy bill relief.
Within the first week, Mr Albanese will face the headwinds of Mr Trump’s “Liberation Day” of mass global tariffs and a Reserve Bank board meeting where interest rates will likely be held.
But after visiting Governor-General Sam Mostyn early on Friday to drown out the Opposition Leader’s budget-in-reply speech the previous night, Mr Albanese focused his press conference on his attempt to paint Mr Dutton as a politician who would “cut” and “wreck’ if he wins on May 3.
“Everything in Peter Dutton’s record tells us that he will start by cutting Medicare and he won’t stop there,” Mr Albanese said in Canberra.
“He will cut everything except your taxes. No-one will get any power from the Liberals’ nuclear reactors for two decades but every Australian will get the bill right away because when Peter Dutton cuts, Australians pay.”
He went to slam the Coalition for its pledge to cut 41,000 public servants, saying it was not “the Australian way” and made the connection between Mr Dutton’s policy and Mr Trump’s attempts to slash the Washington bureaucracy.
Well, people will make their own judgments of course but people will have a look at the mass sackings of public servants (in the US),” Mr Albanese said.
Mr Albanese also claimed that public servants who helped during ex-tropical cyclone Alfred would have been “gone” if Mr Dutton was prime minister now.
“We’ve just been through a flood in Queensland where in Hervey Bay, where I was, 15 public servants working out of a caravan to make sure that those Australians got the money they were entitled to and deserved,” he said.
“They’re gone under Peter Dutton. The National Emergency Management Agency did not exist before we came to office. Now, they’ve had a stockpile of sandbags, a stockpile of generators. That didn’t exist before we came to office. That’s the hard work they’ve done. They’re gone under Peter Dutton.
“Veterans, 42,000 of them, were in the queue for entitlements, men and women who have served our nation in uniform, they were denied entitlements. People passed away without getting the entitlements that they deserved. Peter Dutton regards that as waste.”
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50838
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22836633 (290242ZMAR25) Notable: The ‘sledge-a-thon’ begins: Leaders square off on tax and Trump - Labor has escalated the political fight over the cost of living in the race to the May 3 federal election, accusing the opposition of misleading voters with a claim it would reduce taxes even as the Coalition voted this week against a $17.1 billion personal tax cut. The dispute flared on the first day of the formal campaign after Prime Minister Anthony Albanese called the election with a pledge to lift living standards over the next three years and a warning against copying policy ideas from United States President Donald Trump. Opposition Leader Peter Dutton responded with a warning to voters about the soaring price of groceries and a slump in household incomes over the past three years, while accusing Albanese of starting a “sledge-a-thon” over Trump. Albanese arrived at Government House in Canberra soon after 7am on Friday to ask Governor-General Sam Mostyn to dissolve parliament, setting up a contest between Labor’s offer of a $17.1 billion personal tax cut and the Coalition plan for a $6 billion cut to fuel excise. Dutton said families needed immediate relief on the cost of living rather than the tax cut, which is due to start in July next year and is worth $5 a week in its first year, rising to $10 a week in its second and later years. “We must do better, and there is a better way,” he said. “The Coalition has an achievable plan to get our country back on track.” Dutton also claimed to lower the burden on Australians, saying: “we will reduce tax”. Labor seized on this as a false claim because Dutton voted against the personal tax cut on Wednesday and said on Thursday he had no plans to offer an alternative in the campaign. But the Coalition is vowing to cut fuel excise, which is a form of taxation. Coalition campaign spokesman James Paterson said Labor had claimed excise reductions on beer were a form of tax relief. “Australians will be getting a tax cut every time they visit a petrol station under a Dutton Coalition government,” he said.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50785
>>50833
The ‘sledge-a-thon’ begins: Leaders square off on tax and Trump
David Crowe - March 28, 2025
1/2
Labor has escalated the political fight over the cost of living in the race to the May 3 federal election, accusing the opposition of misleading voters with a claim it would reduce taxes even as the Coalition voted this week against a $17.1 billion personal tax cut.
The dispute flared on the first day of the formal campaign after Prime Minister Anthony Albanese called the election with a pledge to lift living standards over the next three years and a warning against copying policy ideas from United States President Donald Trump.
Opposition Leader Peter Dutton responded with a warning to voters about the soaring price of groceries and a slump in household incomes over the past three years, while accusing Albanese of starting a “sledge-a-thon” over Trump.
Albanese arrived at Government House in Canberra soon after 7am on Friday to ask Governor-General Sam Mostyn to dissolve parliament, setting up a contest between Labor’s offer of a $17.1 billion personal tax cut and the Coalition plan for a $6 billion cut to fuel excise.
Dutton said families needed immediate relief on the cost of living rather than the tax cut, which is due to start in July next year and is worth $5 a week in its first year, rising to $10 a week in its second and later years.
“We must do better, and there is a better way,” he said. “The Coalition has an achievable plan to get our country back on track.”
Dutton also claimed to lower the burden on Australians, saying: “we will reduce tax”. Labor seized on this as a false claim because Dutton voted against the personal tax cut on Wednesday and said on Thursday he had no plans to offer an alternative in the campaign. But the Coalition is vowing to cut fuel excise, which is a form of taxation.
Coalition campaign spokesman James Paterson said Labor had claimed excise reductions on beer were a form of tax relief.
“Australians will be getting a tax cut every time they visit a petrol station under a Dutton Coalition government,” he said.
Labor campaign strategists are seeking to prolong the argument over tax and excise in the belief Albanese is gaining ground thanks to this week’s personal tax cut, but Coalition sources argued their help on petrol and diesel prices was resonating strongly with suburban voters.
Albanese acknowledged that Australians had suffered from cost-of-living pressures but contrasted his plans with Dutton’s proposal for heavy spending on nuclear power stations.
“The world today is an uncertain place, but I am absolutely certain of this: now is not the time for cutting and wrecking, for aiming low, for punching down or looking back,” Albanese said.
“This is a time for building. Building on our nation’s strengths, building our security and prosperity for ourselves, building an Australia where no one is held back and no one is left behind.”
Dutton responded with a warning that living standards had fallen during the past three years, saying this meant the country could not afford three more years of Labor.
“Labor’s economic policies and wasteful spending have increased the cost of living for everyday Australians,” he said.
“Too many young Australians feel that the dream of homeownership is completely beyond them. And what sort of prime minister in the middle of a cost-of-living crisis promises a 70¢-a-day tax cut starting in 15 months’ time. Australian families need relief now.”
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50839
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22836677 (290253ZMAR25) Notable: RAAF chief ‘very comfortable’ with Labor’s air force plan - The Chief of the Air Force Stephen Chappell endorsed Labor’s management of the defence portfolio in an extraordinary intervention just hours before Anthony Albanese called a May 3 election, declaring he was “very comfortable” with the government’s plans for the RAAF fleet. The move came after the air force’s head of capability, Air Vice-Marshal Nicholas Hogan, said an extra F-35 squadron promised by Peter Dutton “would be welcome”. Air Marshal Chappell followed-up his subordinate’s comment with a statement to The Australian. “I am very comfortable the air combat fleet that is being delivered and supported through the 2024 Integrated Investment Program can deliver a high level of lethality,” the RAAF chief said. Defence Minister Richard Marles’ office said it had not asked Air Marshal Chappell to issue the statement, while opposition defence spokesman Andrew Hastie declined to comment. Asked at the Avalon Airshow about Mr Dutton’s F-35 pledge, Air Marshal Hogan said: “Look, more F-35s would be welcome, but we will go with the decisions of the government of the day.” Both commanders’ comments were highly unusual on the eve of an election announcement given Defence jealously guards its apolitical status.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50737
>>50833
RAAF chief ‘very comfortable’ with Labor’s air force plan
BEN PACKHAM - March 28, 2025
The Chief of the Air Force Stephen Chappell endorsed Labor’s management of the defence portfolio in an extraordinary intervention just hours before Anthony Albanese called a May 3 election, declaring he was “very comfortable” with the government’s plans for the RAAF fleet.
The move came after the air force’s head of capability, Air Vice-Marshal Nicholas Hogan, said an extra F-35 squadron promised by Peter Dutton “would be welcome”.
Air Marshal Chappell followed-up his subordinate’s comment with a statement to The Australian. “I am very comfortable the air combat fleet that is being delivered and supported through the 2024 Integrated Investment Program can deliver a high level of lethality,” the RAAF chief said.
Defence Minister Richard Marles’ office said it had not asked Air Marshal Chappell to issue the statement, while opposition defence spokesman Andrew Hastie declined to comment.
Asked at the Avalon Airshow about Mr Dutton’s F-35 pledge, Air Marshal Hogan said: “Look, more F-35s would be welcome, but we will go with the decisions of the government of the day.”
Both commanders’ comments were highly unusual on the eve of an election announcement given Defence jealously guards its apolitical status.
Defence and national security are looming as key election campaign themes, with Mr Dutton vowing to spend “much more” on weapons and equipment than Labor, including an extra $3bn towards an additional 28 F-35s.
Mr Dutton said the Coalition’s defence funding commitment would be “commensurate with the challenges of our times”, with further details to be revealed during the election campaign.
“We’re going to boost spending for the Australian Defence Force because we live in a very uncertain time,” the Opposition Leader said on Friday. “We’re going to make our suburbs and our towns safer, and we’re going to make sure that we have a focus on border security once again.”
The government opted against boosting military spending in Tuesday’s budget, which revealed Defence is struggling to get new capabilities into service and keep its ageing warships and submarines in the water.
According to the budget papers, just 32 per cent of defence funding goes towards acquiring new weapons and equipment – well under the 42 per cent target Labor wants to hit by the end of the decade.
Mr Marles said the Coalition was all talk while the government was ploughing an extra $57bn into defence over the next decade.
“The gap between what the Liberals say and what they do is immense,” he said. “They are experts at announcement, they are experts at press release, but they are not very good on the detail and they don't back it up with actual procurements and allocations in the federal budget.”
Labor and the Coalition are also at odds on whether Australia should send troops to support a British and French-led peacekeeping force in Ukraine, with Mr Albanese keeping the option open. The Prime Minister confirmed on Friday that Australia had taken part in “coalition of the willing” talks in Paris overnight.
Mr Albanese said Ukraine’s struggle wasn’t just about its own sovereignty.
“I want to make it very clear – Australia stands with Ukraine,” he said. “We regard Vladimir Putin as an authoritarian dictator who has imperialistic designs, not just on Ukraine, but on other countries in the region.”
Mr Dutton has pledged ongoing support for Ukraine if he wins the election, but argues the provision of peacekeeping troops is a job for Europe.
Mr Albanese warned any foreign countries considering meddling in the election campaign to “back off”. “Our Australian Defence Force, our Australian security agencies, they’re still in place. We’re a resilient country,” he said.
https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/defence/raaf-chief-very-comfortable-with-labors-air-force-plan/news-story/f00ab8fcca3882db9bb8b8fc9b0966ed
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50840
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22836686 (290256ZMAR25) Notable: ACTU urges protesting voters to put Coalition last - ACTU secretary Sally McManus has urged voters planning to support independents or minor parties in protest at Labor over cost-of-living increases to put the Liberals last on May 3, as the union movement launches a defensive campaign to keep Anthony Albanese in power. As unions prepare to co-ordinate tens of thousands of volunteers to campaign in marginal seats with a “don’t risk Dutton” theme, Ms McManus said she expected Labor would face a protest from voters angry about cost-of-living increases. The nation’s top union official issued her warning as the Prime Minister faces battles to retain seats against not just the Liberals but the Greens and independents, and polls point towards a hung parliament. “I think it’s very much the same around the world and I think it’s true that people are under pressure and obviously aren’t thinking through the ins and outs, and why and how, they just know when they go and pay their bills, that it’s costing more,” she said. Signalling a more defensive campaign than the one the unions ran to help the ALP sweep back into power three years ago, Ms McManus said the union movement’s issues were “all about protecting wage increases, protecting what workers have won with improvements to workers’ rights” under Labor. “I think people will be wanting to send a message about cost of living but they’re not wanting to vote for Peter Dutton,” she said. “I think people are on to him. They’re concerned that he’s not the solution so I think there might be a protest vote, that’s for sure. If you are thinking about voting independent, or differently, but you don’t want Peter Dutton, you have got to put them last. You can’t assume everyone understands how it all works and that’s the simple message to understand, that even if you want to send a message, or you want to try something else, but you don’t want Peter Dutton, you have got to put the Liberals last, or the LNP in Queensland last, or the CLP last if you’re in the Northern Territory.”
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50833
ACTU urges protesting voters to put Coalition last
EWIN HANNAN - 28 March 2025
ACTU secretary Sally McManus has urged voters planning to support independents or minor parties in protest at Labor over cost-of-living increases to put the Liberals last on May 3, as the union movement launches a defensive campaign to keep Anthony Albanese in power.
As unions prepare to co-ordinate tens of thousands of volunteers to campaign in marginal seats with a “don’t risk Dutton” theme, Ms McManus said she expected Labor would face a protest from voters angry about cost-of-living increases.
The nation’s top union official issued her warning as the Prime Minister faces battles to retain seats against not just the Liberals but the Greens and independents, and polls point towards a hung parliament.
“I think it’s very much the same around the world and I think it’s true that people are under pressure and obviously aren’t thinking through the ins and outs, and why and how, they just know when they go and pay their bills, that it’s costing more,” she said.
Signalling a more defensive campaign than the one the unions ran to help the ALP sweep back into power three years ago, Ms McManus said the union movement’s issues were “all about protecting wage increases, protecting what workers have won with improvements to workers’ rights” under Labor.
In contrast, she said, the Coalition has announced plans to take rights from casuals, abolish the right to disconnect, and signalled an intention to try to repeal the “same job, same pay” laws that have already delivered substantial pay rises.
Given the impact of global inflation, she said, the cost-of-living increases would have occurred if Peter Dutton had been in office. But the Coalition, she said, would have “sat on its hands”, unlike Labor, which changed workplace laws and made decisions to put workers in a better financial position.
“I think people will be wanting to send a message about cost of living but they’re not wanting to vote for Peter Dutton,” she said. “I think people are on to him. They’re concerned that he’s not the solution so I think there might be a protest vote, that’s for sure.
“If you are thinking about voting independent, or differently, but you don’t want Peter Dutton, you have got to put them last. You can’t assume everyone understands how it all works and that’s the simple message to understand, that even if you want to send a message, or you want to try something else, but you don’t want Peter Dutton, you have got to put the Liberals last, or the LNP in Queensland last, or the CLP last if you’re in the Northern Territory.”
Ms McManus said Mr Dutton’s plans to cut 41,000 federal public servants would not only directly impact those workers but flow through to their families, communities and local economies.
“We see it as high risk Dutton being elected because of wage rises being on the table, workers’ rights being on the table, so every union will be spelling that out to their members, explaining straight out of Peter Dutton’s mouth and Michaelia Cash’s mouth what they intend to do,” she said. “So it will be up to people to determine what to do but in the end it will be a huge risk if you vote for him.
“Unlike other elections, where people could say the ACTU is always concerned about workers’ rights because it’s our job to worry about them, this time we are very, very concerned about it, like it’s a massive risk, and I think it will also be a key thing in the election because it’s a cost-of-living election and you have got to have a plan for wages, real wages, to grow if you are serious about addressing it.”
Anthony Albanese said real wages would not have been growing if Mr Dutton had had his way.
He said the “same job same pay” laws had benefited workers employed in the aviation, mining and resources sectors, resulting in pay rises of up to $34,000 a year.
https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/actu-urges-protesting-voters-to-put-coalition-last/news-story/4baea0c7c1b4fcf076bf586ddee92a3e
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50841
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22836700 (290302ZMAR25) Notable: Coalition takes aim at teals over ‘record of leaning Green’ - Teal independents have sided with the Greens in at least two-thirds of all divisions during Anthony Albanese’s three years in power, according to research by the parliament library. As the Coalition battles to reclaim once blue-ribbon seats it lost in 2022, the research provided to the Coalition shows that the seven teal MPs voted with the Greens between 66 per cent and 77 per cent of the time on all divisions from the start of the parliamentary term to February 13. As the Coalition ramps up its attacks on the teals for being “deceptive Greens” ahead of the election on May 3, the analysis has revealed the independents voted with the minor party on second-reading motions between 83 per cent and 70 per cent of the time. When it comes to second-reading motions, Sophie Scamps voted with the Greens 83 per cent of the time, Zoe Daniel 81 per cent, Zali Steggall 78, Monique Ryan 76, Kate Chaney 71 and Allegra Spender 70. Outgoing teal MP Kylea Tink, whose seat of North Sydney was absorbed in an electoral redrawn, voted in line with the Greens on 78 per cent of second-reading motions. Indi MP Helen Haines backed the party 79 per cent of the time. The independent MPs identified in the research have disputed the findings, arguing that their voting record reflects a more balanced political alignment based on alternative figures. On all divisions, Dr Ryan voted with the Greens 77 per cent of the time, Ms Daniel 76, Dr Scamps 74, Ms Steggall 71, Ms Chaney 68 and Ms Spender 66. Ms Tink voted 73 per cent in line with the Greens on divisions and Ms Haines 76. Liberal MP Garth Hamilton, who has been closely observing the teals’ voting records, said the data showed the risk posed by a Labor minority government run with the support of the teals. “It couldn’t be more clear to the Australian people now, who these people are,” he said. “The stories that these were disaffected Liberals have been proven false - they’re very deceptive Greens.”
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50822
>>50833
Coalition takes aim at teals over ‘record of leaning Green’
RHIANNON DOWN - 29 March 2025
Teal independents have sided with the Greens in at least two-thirds of all divisions during Anthony Albanese’s three years in power, according to research by the parliament library.
As the Coalition battles to reclaim once blue-ribbon seats it lost in 2022, the research provided to the Coalition shows that the seven teal MPs voted with the Greens between 66 per cent and 77 per cent of the time on all divisions from the start of the parliamentary term to February 13.
As the Coalition ramps up its attacks on the teals for being “deceptive Greens” ahead of the election on May 3, the analysis has revealed the independents voted with the minor party on second-reading motions between 83 per cent and 70 per cent of the time.
When it comes to second-reading motions, Sophie Scamps voted with the Greens 83 per cent of the time, Zoe Daniel 81 per cent, Zali Steggall 78, Monique Ryan 76, Kate Chaney 71 and Allegra Spender 70. Outgoing teal MP Kylea Tink, whose seat of North Sydney was absorbed in an electoral redrawn, voted in line with the Greens on 78 per cent of second-reading motions. Indi MP Helen Haines backed the party 79 per cent of the time.
The independent MPs identified in the research have disputed the findings, arguing that their voting record reflects a more balanced political alignment based on alternative figures.
On all divisions, Dr Ryan voted with the Greens 77 per cent of the time, Ms Daniel 76, Dr Scamps 74, Ms Steggall 71, Ms Chaney 68 and Ms Spender 66. Ms Tink voted 73 per cent in line with the Greens on divisions and Ms Haines 76.
Liberal MP Garth Hamilton, who has been closely observing the teals’ voting records, said the data showed the risk posed by a Labor minority government run with the support of the teals.
“It couldn’t be more clear to the Australian people now, who these people are,” he said. “The stories that these were disaffected Liberals have been proven false – they’re very deceptive Greens.”
The analysis showed the independents voted with the Coalition on 33 per cent of divisions on average and on 20 per cent of second-reading motions. They also sided with Labor on 44 per cent of all divisions on average, and on 73 per cent of second-reading motions.
Ms Spender said the figures were “highly misleading”, disputing that her voting history was so strongly aligned with the Greens and arguing that, by the same metrics, the Liberal MP who previously held her seat, Dave Sharma, voted 99 per cent in line with Pauline Hanson.
“I have supported 60 per cent of votes put forward by the Coalition, 50 per cent by Labor, and 45 per cent by the Greens,” she said. Disputing the methodology of the analysis, Ms Chaney said her true political leanings should be calculated based on the number of proposals from each party which she had backed rather than how often she had “voted with them”.
Dr Ryan also rejected the figures, pointing to data which showed over 504 divisions since she was elected and November, she had voted in line with Labor on 51 per cent of occasions, with the Coalition on 42 per cent and the Greens on 57 per cent.
Dr Scamps said it was “sad that the Coalition is attempting to win an election based on a misinformation campaign and attack ads rather than with good ideas and good policies”.
She said she voted with Labor on 45 per cent of motions, the Coalition 42 per cent and the Greens 56 per cent.
Ms Daniel has presented her own figures, saying she had voted with the government in 53 per cent of Labor’s 234 motions which she attended, with the Coalition on 41 per cent of 131 motions it put forward and in favour of 52 per cent of 46 Greens motions.
Ms Steggall said the figures were “incorrect”, and she had supported 52 per cent of Labor motions, 52 per cent of Liberal and 54 per cent of Greens motions.
“The Coalition data misrepresents my voting record because it is also counting when the Greens supported my motions – and I have no control about how they vote,” she said.
Declaring she was “proud” of her voting record and that she reviews each bill on its merits, Ms Haines said she attended divisions at almost twice the rate of some Coalition backbenchers.
“My opponents seek to distort my voting record to discredit my independence, but what they don’t say is how often the Coalition doesn’t turn up to vote on amendments moved by myself and my crossbench colleagues,” she said.
https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/coalition-takes-aim-at-teals-over-record-of-leaning-green/news-story/1f6b95bc9720f0fe69772ae997986f70
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50842
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22836738 (290313ZMAR25) Notable: Election 2025: ‘Un-Muslim’: How battle for Sydney’s west turned ‘militant, toxic’ - The political battle for Sydney’s southwest and long-held ALP heartlands has turned “toxic”, with corflutes defaced, “militant tactics” deployed, and mosques and Islamic schools attacked on social media for appearing with Labor figures. Reminiscent of 2024’s British election, where four “Gaza independents” were elected amid alleged “bullying and intimidatory tactics”, anti-Labor pro-Palestine campaigns have ramped up as tensions have begun to boil. Islamic schools and moderate Muslim leaders have been attacked on social media as “normalisers” for engaging with the government, corflutes at mosques have been stolen or destroyed, Tony Burke posters have been vandalised with slurs or smeared with paint, and Hizb ut-Tahrir activists have forced ALP candidates to cancel events given fears of tensions boiling over. Backed by The Muslim Vote campaign, Ziad Basyouny is taking on Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke in Watson, while Ahmed Ouf is looking to topple Education Minister Jason Clare in Blaxland, which are both held with about a 15 per cent margin and where Muslim voters make up 27 per cent and 35 per cent respectively in the two seats. Mr Burke has become a particular target for activists, with scores of his posters destroyed or defaced with the slur “c*nt” and splattered with red paint. Anti-ALP campaigners have started to distribute flyers in Arabic about the member, one of the Labor’s most vocal supporters of Palestinian statehood, calling him the “racist immigration minister”. Those flyers, which don’t carry an electoral authorisation, come despite Australia providing pathways for thousands of affected Gazans and feature misleading claims about Mr Burke’s historical support.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50819
>>50833
Election 2025: ‘Un-Muslim’: How battle for Sydney’s west turned ‘militant, toxic’
ALEXI DEMETRIADI - March 27, 2025
1/2
The political battle for Sydney’s southwest and long-held ALP heartlands has turned “toxic”, with corflutes defaced, “militant tactics” deployed, and mosques and Islamic schools attacked on social media for appearing with Labor figures.
Reminiscent of 2024’s British election, where four “Gaza independents” were elected amid alleged “bullying and intimidatory tactics”, anti-Labor pro-Palestine campaigns have ramped up as tensions have begun to boil.
Islamic schools and moderate Muslim leaders have been attacked on social media as “normalisers” for engaging with the government, corflutes at mosques have been stolen or destroyed, Tony Burke posters have been vandalised with slurs or smeared with paint, and Hizb ut-Tahrir activists have forced ALP candidates to cancel events given fears of tensions boiling over.
Backed by The Muslim Vote campaign, Ziad Basyouny is taking on Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke in Watson, while Ahmed Ouf is looking to topple Education Minister Jason Clare in Blaxland, which are both held with about a 15 per cent margin and where Muslim voters make up 27 per cent and 35 per cent respectively in the two seats.
Mr Burke has become a particular target for activists, with scores of his posters destroyed or defaced with the slur “c. t” and splattered with red paint.
Anti-ALP campaigners have started to distribute flyers in Arabic about the member, one of the Labor’s most vocal supporters of Palestinian statehood, calling him the “racist immigration minister”.
Those flyers, which don’t carry an electoral authorisation, come despite Australia providing pathways for thousands of affected Gazans and feature misleading claims about Mr Burke’s historical support.
Activists have unfurled banners decrying “Bloody Burke” outside the minister’s electorate office and on Wednesday, at a Lakemba iftar, displayed another alleging he supported genocide.
Anti-Labor campaigners have also targeted Mr Clare, with Auburn’s Gallipoli Mosque forced to install CCTV cameras after repeat vandalism of the minister’s corflutes it had displayed at its front gate.
The mosque, whose leaders have remained steadfast in support of Mr Clare, stood down calls to remove the posters, but which were later destroyed by vandals on two separate occasions.
Hizb ut-Tahrir activists have also targeted Mr Burke, via that group’s social-media front, Stand 4 Palestine, which has links with The Muslim Vote.
In a video uploaded to its Instagram account – and later shared by Dr Basyouny’s campaign manager – Hizb ut-Tahrir activist Mohamed al-Wahwah is seen standing outside a Parry Park community centre where Mr Burke was slated to speak.
Calling Mr Burke a “rat”, Mr al-Wahwah claimed the minister had refused to front the community and “scurried out”.
Mr Burke was invited to speak as part of a questions and answers session, but after a texts had been sent out by anti-ALP activists urging “brothers to show them (the ministers) that they’re not welcome” at least 15 men not part of the centre’s congregation arrived, and a mutual decision was taken to cancel the event to avoid inflaming tensions.
The Australian is not suggesting that independent candidates Dr Basyouny and Mr Ouf, or Muslim Vote convener sheik Wesam Charkawi, are themselves involved in the allegations, just that local anti-ALP activists are.
But their task has been made harder after the Liberals confirmed it would preference the two independents below Labor and both could struggle to win a plurality of voters from the Islamic faith, given staunch opposition to their campaigns within elements of the community.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50843
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22840833 (300803ZMAR25) Notable: Australia's Albanese expects 'one-on-one' discussion with Trump on tariffs - Australia's Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said on Sunday he expected to have a one-on-one discussion with U.S. President Donald Trump on tariffs, as Washington prepares to announce new tariffs on its trading partners on April 2. There are concerns Australia could be impacted by the looming escalation in the Trump administration's global trade war when it unveils the reciprocal tariffs on so-called "liberation day". Trump this month imposed steel and aluminium tariffs that affect Australian exports. Albanese, speaking on the second full day of campaigning ahead of a May 3 general election in Australia, said his government had engaged "very constructively" with U.S. officials on tariffs, ahead of the expected April 2 announcement. Asked about the possibility of speaking with Trump on the issue, Albanese said: "We'll have a one-on-one discussion". "A couple of weeks ago, the reason why that didn't occur was because the president made a decision to not talk to anyone and impose this regime on every country," Albanese added, in remarks televised by the Australian Broadcasting Corp from Canberra. A key issue in Australia's election campaign is which leader - Albanese or the Liberal-National coalition's Peter Dutton - would best handle relations with Trump, who exempted Australia from U.S. tariffs on steel and aluminium during his first presidential term.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50785
>>50833
Australia's Albanese expects 'one-on-one' discussion with Trump on tariffs
Sam McKeith - March 30, 2025
SYDNEY, March 30 (Reuters) - Australia's Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said on Sunday he expected to have a one-on-one discussion with U.S. President Donald Trump on tariffs, as Washington prepares to announce new tariffs on its trading partners on April 2.
There are concerns Australia could be impacted by the looming escalation in the Trump administration's global trade war when it unveils the reciprocal tariffs on so-called "liberation day". Trump this month imposed steel and aluminium tariffs that affect Australian exports.
Albanese, speaking on the second full day of campaigning ahead of a May 3 general election in Australia, said his government had engaged "very constructively" with U.S. officials on tariffs, ahead of the expected April 2 announcement.
Asked about the possibility of speaking with Trump on the issue, Albanese said: "We'll have a one-on-one discussion".
"A couple of weeks ago, the reason why that didn't occur was because the president made a decision to not talk to anyone and impose this regime on every country," Albanese added, in remarks televised by the Australian Broadcasting Corp from Canberra.
A key issue in Australia's election campaign is which leader - Albanese or the Liberal-National coalition's Peter Dutton - would best handle relations with Trump, who exempted Australia from U.S. tariffs on steel and aluminium during his first presidential term.
Albanese has previously said his centre-left Labor government is "engaging on a daily basis" with the Trump administration over tariffs, pointing to his two phone calls with the U.S. president and early meetings between the two countries' defence and foreign ministers.
Also on Sunday, Albanese's government made a pledge to crack down on price gouging by the nation's supermarkets, as part of the five-week election campaign in which the cost of living also is a central issue. Albanese on Saturday touted Labor's credentials on affordable healthcare.
The government is running neck-and-neck in opinion polls with the National-Liberal coalition, which has campaigned on a housing crisis that it claims is putting home ownership out of reach. Longer-term, the coalition wants to adopt nuclear power in the country.
After enjoying a healthy lead for much of his term, Albanese's personal approval ratings are now near those of Dutton, a former police officer and the defence minister in the last conservative government.
https://www.reuters.com/world/australias-albanese-expects-one-on-one-discussion-with-trump-tariffs-2025-03-30/
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50844
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22840841 (300809ZMAR25) Notable: Golfing legend Greg Norman acting as Australia’s intermediary with US President Donald Trump as new wave of tariffs loom - Golfing great Greg Norman is once again acting as a go-between for Australia and US President Donald Trump as the clock ticks to the April 2 decision on reciprocal tariffs. The two men have been close for many years and regularly discuss their passion for golf as neighbours in the southern US state of Florida. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese had a missed call from Norman on Sunday morning as he was waiting to go on air for the ABC’s Insiders, confirming he was “calling in” all contacts to get Australia exemptions and a better deal. President Trump has revealed that he “may give a lot of countries breaks” from the reciprocal tariff regime as the world waits for who is in and who is out. The US President has billed April 2 as “liberation day” where he is considering sweeping new tariffs beyond the steel and aluminium tariffs that affect Australian exports. “We’ll have a one-on-one discussion,’’ Mr Albanese said. “We are putting Australia’s case. Tariffs are an increase in price for the purchases of the goods and services, so they impose increased costs on American buyers. “We believe in free and fair trade. The US enjoys a trade surplus with Australia. We are pointing that out very clearly.”
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>>/qresearch/22465975 (pb)
>>50785
>>50833
Golfing legend Greg Norman acting as Australia’s intermediary with US President Donald Trump as new wave of tariffs loom
A missed phone call on Anthony Albanese’s phone has shed light into how the PM plans to convince Donald Trump to spare Australia from further brutal tariffs.
Samantha Maiden - March 30, 2025
Golfing great Greg Norman is once again acting as a go-between for Australia and US President Donald Trump as the clock ticks to the April 2 decision on reciprocal tariffs.
The two men have been close for many years and regularly discuss their passion for golf as neighbours in the southern US state of Florida.
Prime Minister Anthony Albanese had a missed call from Norman on Sunday morning as he was waiting to go on air for the ABC’s Insiders, confirming he was “calling in” all contacts to get Australia exemptions and a better deal.
President Trump has revealed that he “may give a lot of countries breaks” from the reciprocal tariff regime as the world waits for who is in and who is out.
The US President has billed April 2 as “liberation day” where he is considering sweeping new tariffs beyond the steel and aluminium tariffs that affect Australian exports.
“We’ll have a one-on-one discussion,’’ Mr Albanese said.
“We are putting Australia’s case. Tariffs are an increase in price for the purchases of the goods and services, so they impose increased costs on American buyers.
“We believe in free and fair trade. The US enjoys a trade surplus with Australia. We are pointing that out very clearly.”
During Mr Trump’s first presidential term, Norman – who has a close relationship with the golf-mad US President– played a key role in connecting then prime minister Malcolm Turnbull and the president before Australia secured a tariff exemption.
“If I can give one tiny bit of help that can help going forward between our two nations, I would do it,” Mr Norman said last month after being formally appointed as a board member for the organising committee of the 2023 Olympic and Paralympic Games in Brisbane.
“I’ve done it in the past, I would do it again.”
“I do know he’s very aware” of AUKUS,” Mr Norman added.
“He understands the extremely tight connection between Australia and the US [which] I call big brother-little brother, that’s how I worded it with him. And I said the importance of that has been decades and decades old, and it’s not going to go anywhere.”
The man known as the Great White Shark has previously described the US President as “a breath of fresh air” for America because of the business prowess he brings to politics.
Norman, who lives in Florida, previously revealed that Mr Trump wanted to make him a US citizen.
“We played golf just before he got elected, and he said: ‘If I get elected, I’m going to give you a citizenship’,” he said.
“A lot of people ask me questions about how Trump is doing different relationships, and I say: ‘Take emotion out of your thoughts. Take a look at the value of what’s happening between the two countries.
“And if you understand the true value between the two countries, then you might have a different opinion and a different understanding.”
Norman has previously hinted he was called upon to help set up a meeting between the President and Australia’s ambassador Kevin Rudd.
“If I can just give one little bit of information to help two people get together, then I’m so proud to be able to do that,” Mr Norman told a dinner in Washington earlier this year.
After Mr Trump won the US election in 2016, Norman helped set up a phone call between then-prime minister Malcolm Turnbull and the incoming president.
“In diplomacy and politics you use lots of networks and all I can say is we have great networks, great contacts and Greg Norman is a great Australian,” Mr Turnbull said.
“One of our greatest assets is the millions of Australians who live overseas. Greg Norman is one of them. He has been a great help.”
At the time, Norman said it was a pleasure and an honour to facilitate the connection between the Prime Minister and Mr Trump, at the request of Australia’s ambassador Joe Hockey.
“I have great respect for both men who have been voted in by the people of their respective countries and I am fortunate enough to call Mr Trump a friend, so I was happy to put them in touch to further the incredible long-standing relationship the two countries have experienced,” he said.
https://www.news.com.au/finance/economy/federal-budget/golfing-legend-greg-norman-acting-as-australias-intermediary-with-us-president-donald-trump-as-new-wave-of-tariffs-loom/news-story/46be9400c53db76e5ea738d8bf9c245f
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50845
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22840846 (300814ZMAR25) Notable: Albanese calls Dutton a copycat but won’t say who he gets his ideas from - Labor has countered the Coalition on its vow to force gas exporters to reserve more fuel for the domestic market, saying it will use an existing law to ensure supplies for households and industry. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said the existing law, passed at the end of 2022 over Coalition objections, already worked as a gas reservation plan because it gave the government the power to direct the companies when needed. Asked if he was willing to get more gas from the exporters if needed, Albanese said: “Of course. The law provides that, most importantly, and we’ve acted.” The fight over gas came as Albanese stepped up his claim that Dutton was copying policy ideas from others, naming the Coalition’s plan to cut 41,000 public service jobs as an example. Asked on the ABC’s Insiders program on Sunday morning if he was likening Dutton to US President Donald Trump, who is also cutting public service jobs, the prime minister said: “Well, people will draw conclusions themselves when they see mass job cuts.” But Albanese did not make a direct claim about Dutton and Trump when asked about the parallel. “Is it helpful for Australia right now for you to be using Donald Trump as a political weapon against your opponent?” interviewer David Speers asked on Insiders. “I’m not,” Albanese said. He claimed Dutton was copying policies from other Liberal leaders, given the Coalition’s promise of a $6 billion cut to fuel excise follows a similar plan from Scott Morrison as prime minister three years ago.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50785
>>50833
Albanese calls Dutton a copycat but won’t say who he gets his ideas from
David Crowe - March 30, 2025
Labor has countered the Coalition on its vow to force gas exporters to reserve more fuel for the domestic market, saying it will use an existing law to ensure supplies for households and industry.
Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said the existing law, passed at the end of 2022 over Coalition objections, already worked as a gas reservation plan because it gave the government the power to direct the companies when needed.
Asked if he was willing to get more gas from the exporters if needed, Albanese said: “Of course. The law provides that, most importantly, and we’ve acted.”
Opposition Leader Peter Dutton said he could reduce the wholesale gas price to below $10 a gigajoule and also vowed to open up more gas fields by overcoming environmental barriers to new projects.
But the Coalition is not promising a cut to household costs and said on Sunday that it would not forecast the impact on consumer prices.
The fight over gas came as Albanese stepped up his claim that Dutton was copying policy ideas from others, naming the Coalition’s plan to cut 41,000 public service jobs as an example.
Asked on the ABC’s Insiders program on Sunday morning if he was likening Dutton to US President Donald Trump, who is also cutting public service jobs, the prime minister said: “Well, people will draw conclusions themselves when they see mass job cuts.”
But Albanese did not make a direct claim about Dutton and Trump when asked about the parallel.
“Is it helpful for Australia right now for you to be using Donald Trump as a political weapon against your opponent?” interviewer David Speers asked on Insiders.
“I’m not,” Albanese said. He claimed Dutton was copying policies from other Liberal leaders, given the Coalition’s promise of a $6 billion cut to fuel excise follows a similar plan from Scott Morrison as prime minister three years ago.
The argument over energy intensified on Sunday when Albanese hardened his language on gas reservation and the Coalition energy spokesman, Ted O’Brien, ruled out a promise on consumer prices.
O’Brien told Sky News he would not try to make a promise like Albanese did at the last election by claiming household electricity prices would fall by $275 – a forecast that proved wrong.
“We will not be doing what Labor did and making a promise about a $275 reduction in household power bills or anything like that,” he said.
Albanese side-stepped questions on Sunday about whether he would extend Labor’s $75 per quarter energy bill subsidy beyond December.
On another household cost, the Coalition said it would review its cut to fuel excise after the first year, holding out the prospect of more help.
The Coalition claimed it would reduce the wholesale gas price from $14 to $10 or lower per gigajoule, but the most recent figures from the Australian Energy Regulator show that average prices have been below $14 in recent months.
The regulator said the average price was $12.17 in Victoria in the financial year to date, compared to $13.12 in Sydney, $13.67 in Brisbane and $13.16 in Adelaide.
Dutton said the election would turn on the key question of trust on the economy.
“We’ve got a big gas policy out there which will bring down the price of gas and electricity, and I think it’s about who you trust to manage the economy, and who do you trust to keep our country safe,” he told radio station 2GB on Sunday morning.
“And they’ll be the test that I think people apply ultimately, and the things that will decide the next election.”
The Coalition said it would release the economic modelling to explain the impact of its gas plan to reserve more supply for the domestic market without forcing gas exporters to break existing contracts with customers in markets such as Japan, South Korea and China.
“We honour those foundation contracts, but there’s a lot of gas that gets sold into the international market beyond that which we think should be put back into the domestic market,” Dutton told 2GB.
“And we’re requiring the companies to do that. We’re requiring them to do it at the cost of production effectively.”
Albanese said the government’s price caps on coal and gas in December 2022 – a law the Coalition voted against – had helped to reduce the spot price for gas from $30 per gigajoule.
“We secured six times more gas than what Peter Dutton committed to securing,” he said.
“All it is, is essentially a search for a distraction from his $600 billion nuclear plan.”
https://www.theage.com.au/politics/federal/albanese-calls-dutton-a-copycat-but-won-t-say-who-he-gets-his-ideas-from-20250330-p5lnlc.html
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50846
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22845448 (310810ZMAR25) Notable: Election 2025: Peter Dutton moves to calm his anxious troops after bumpy campaign start - Peter Dutton has sought to rally Coalition MPs nervous about the party’s performance and the drop in the Opposition Leader’s personal approval ratings, assuring those worried that the Coalition had not convinced voters of its message that “You haven’t seen anything yet”. The Australian on Monday revealed internal concerns over the performance of the Coalition, with MPs admitting they believed the party was still lacking solid economic policies while former deputy prime minister Michael McCormack said it was clear there was “a lot of work to do” before May 3. Mr Dutton on Tuesday hit back at suggestions his campaign had not started off well, declaring it was too early to make any judgment on the Coalition’s performance. “I don’t think you’ve seen anything yet - wait until we get into this campaign and you will see more of what we’ve got to offer,” the Liberal leader said when confronted with the critiques from within his own party. “I will lead a team into the next election, which is experienced and which has the ability not just to clean up Labor’s mess, but to implement our positive plan.”
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50708
>>50833
Albanese edges ahead of Dutton as Labor bounces back: poll
David Crowe - March 30, 2025
1/2
Voters have swung to Labor with a surge of support that has given Prime Minister Anthony Albanese a personal edge over Opposition Leader Peter Dutton as the country’s preferred leader, lifting the government out of a long slump ahead of the May 3 election.
The dramatic swing has tightened the race for power in the opening stage of the election campaign, putting Labor and the Coalition on 50 per cent each in two-party terms in the first Resolve Political Monitor after last week’s federal budget.
Albanese has taken the lead over Dutton as preferred prime minister, ahead by 42 to 33 per cent, in a significant shift since he fell behind the opposition leader at the start of this year.
But Dutton retains a big gap against Albanese as the best leader to handle US President Donald Trump, ahead by 31 to 20 per cent, even as the prime minister suggests his opponent is trying to copy the American leader.
The exclusive survey, conducted for this masthead by research firm Resolve Strategic, shows Labor has increased its primary vote from 25 to 29 per cent over the past month, while the Coalition’s core support has slipped from 39 to 37 per cent.
Resolve director Jim Reed said this came from a boost for Labor from men and women across all age groups, with a slightly stronger gain in support from “middle Australia” parents.
“There has been a swing to Labor among voters with jobs and mortgages – those who would benefit the most from the interest rate cut in February and the budget measures last week,” he said.
“But the budget itself is not rated that well. This means the turnaround for Labor is not so much a budget bounce but is more about the budget, the rate cut and the response to the recent cyclone demonstrating competence together.”
The survey asked voters to allocate preferences as they would on the ballot paper, enabling Resolve to calculate the result in two-party terms. Counted this way, Labor and the Coalition were on 50 per cent each.
When preferences were allocated in the way they flowed at the last election, Labor had a narrow lead of 51 to 49 per cent.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50847
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22845454 (310825ZMAR25) Notable: Video: Anthony Albanese abandons modelling underpinning Labor’s energy and climate agenda - Anthony Albanese’s energy and climate change transition has been rocked after the Prime Minister junked ALP-commissioned modelling underpinning Labor’s promise to cut power bills by $378 from 2030 and the government’s 43 per cent emissions reduction target. In a move attacked by the Coalition and Greens as “waving the white flag on power prices” and not “cutting emissions fast enough”, Mr Albanese torpedoed the 2022 election RepuTex modelling he previously dubbed “the most comprehensive modelling ever done for any policy by any opposition in Australia’s history since Federation”. Asked by The Australian whether Labor stood-by its Powering Australia modelling that electricity bills would reduce by more than $100 between 2025 and 2030, Mr Albanese on Sunday declared three-times that it was “RepuTex’s modelling”. Mr Albanese has blamed international factors including the Ukraine war, for failing to deliver $275 reductions in power bills by 2025. But this is not relevant to the modelling assumption there would be a further $100 fall in energy costs over the five years to 2030. Mr Albanese had earlier refused to guarantee that power prices would fall once Labor’s energy relief rebates expired at the end of 2025.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50833
Anthony Albanese abandons modelling underpinning Labor’s energy and climate agenda
GEOFF CHAMBERS and GREG BROWN - 30 March 2025
1/2
Anthony Albanese’s energy and climate change transition has been rocked after the Prime Minister junked ALP-commissioned modelling underpinning Labor’s promise to cut power bills by $378 from 2030 and the government’s 43 per cent emissions reduction target.
In a move attacked by the Coalition and Greens as “waving the white flag on power prices” and not “cutting emissions fast enough”, Mr Albanese torpedoed the 2022 election RepuTex modelling he previously dubbed “the most comprehensive modelling ever done for any policy by any opposition in Australia’s history since Federation”.
Asked by The Australian whether Labor stood-by its Powering Australia modelling that electricity bills would reduce by more than $100 between 2025 and 2030, Mr Albanese on Sunday declared three-times that it was “RepuTex’s modelling”.
Mr Albanese has blamed international factors including the Ukraine war, for failing to deliver $275 reductions in power bills by 2025. But this is not relevant to the modelling assumption there would be a further $100 fall in energy costs over the five years to 2030. Mr Albanese had earlier refused to guarantee that power prices would fall once Labor’s energy relief rebates expired at the end of 2025.
As the energy wars intensified heading into day four of the election campaign, with Mr Albanese and Peter Dutton set to campaign in Perth and Sydney on Monday, the Opposition Leader came under pressure for failing to provide details on how voters would be better off under the Coalition’s nuclear and gas-powered energy plan.
Mr Albanese said Mr Dutton “can’t explain anything about his policies, how it will work, how it will make a difference … all it is essentially, is a search for a distraction from his $600bn nuclear plan”.
Mr Dutton later said he would release “some more analysis … over the next couple of days which will provide some percentage figures and some detail about what we expect the impact will be”.
The Liberal leader’s intervention came after opposition climate change and energy spokesman Ted O’Brien and Coalition campaign spokesman James Paterson refused to provide clarity on how their gas-fired energy plan would lower prices. Senator Paterson said “we’re not planning on putting a dollar figure on how much your personal bills will go down”.
Labor and the Coalition are also under pressure from the Greens and Climate 200-backed Teals for entering the campaign with no 2035 emissions reduction targets, after the Climate Change Authority in December delayed providing advice to Climate Change and Energy Minister Chris Bowen for “several months”.
Mr Albanese’s move to distance himself from the modelling comes after Mr Bowen told The Australian earlier this month that he was standing firm on key Powering Australia assumptions, including achieving 82 per cent of renewables in the grid by 2030. In addition to lowering average retail power bills by $275 from mid-2025 and $378 by the end of the decade, the Powering Australia modelling made bold assumptions around new jobs, investment and emissions reduction without providing analysis underpinning its forecasts.
The modelling, which was quietly scrubbed from the ALP website weeks ahead of the May 3 election, anchored Labor’s 43 per cent emissions reduction target by 2030, the 82 per cent renewable energy penetration goal, and included claims that 604,000 direct and indirect jobs would be created by 2030. It said emissions would be cut by 440 mega tonnes by 2030 and forecasted the policy would deliver $24bn in public investment, driving $76bn in total investment.
When Mr Albanese launched the Powering Australia policy and RepuTex forecasts, he said “our plan will create 604,000 extra jobs by 2030 … it will see electricity prices fall from the current level by $275 for household by 2025 at the end of our first term if we are successful”.
Mr Bowen said “the modelling shows that Labor’s policy will reduce emissions by 43 per cent by 2030, and Australia’s electricity market will be 82 per cent renewable”.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50848
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22845460 (310837ZMAR25) Notable: Election 2025: I don’t need Scott Morrison to take on Trump, says Dutton - Peter Dutton has brushed off the idea of using Scott Morrison as a conduit for Donald Trump as Anthony Albanese says he couldn’t get a call with the US President because he had “made a decision not to talk to anyone”. Ahead of a week expected to be dominated by the “Liberation Day” global reciprocal tariffs - due to be announced on Wednesday (AEDT) – the Prime Minister denied linking his rival to the US President, despite having made a series of veiled allusions. When asked whether it was wise to link Mr Dutton and Mr Trump in the middle of tariff negotiations, Mr Albanese responded: “I’m not”. “People will draw conclusions themselves when they see mass job cuts,” Mr Albanese said. “He is talking here … about 41,000 public servants … There is no doubt that there will be consequences.” The Opposition Leader has responded to Mr Albanese’s comments that he was “photocopying” or “borrowing” policies from abroad, in a clear attempt to link the Coalition leader and the US President, by describing such language as needless “sledging”. As he faces the prospect of taking over the nation’s relationship with the US, Mr Dutton on Sunday brushed aside suggestions of deploying Mr Morrison into Australia’s embassy or in any other role that could benefit the Canberra-Washington relationship. “I’ve got high praise for Scott … but as I’ve pointed out before, we’ve got an ambassador in place and I want that ambassador to be successful,” he said.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50785
>>50833
Election 2025: I don’t need Scott Morrison to take on Trump, says Dutton
SARAH ISON - 30 March 2025
Peter Dutton has brushed off the idea of using Scott Morrison as a conduit for Donald Trump as Anthony Albanese says he couldn’t get a call with the US President because he had “made a decision not to talk to anyone”.
Ahead of a week expected to be dominated by the “Liberation Day” global reciprocal tariffs – due to be announced on Wednesday (AEDT) – the Prime Minister denied linking his rival to the US President, despite having made a series of veiled allusions.
When asked whether it was wise to link Mr Dutton and Mr Trump in the middle of tariff negotiations, Mr Albanese responded: “I’m not”.
“People will draw conclusions themselves when they see mass job cuts,” Mr Albanese said. “He is talking here … about 41,000 public servants … There is no doubt that there will be consequences.”
The direct cost of the US tariffs on Australian aluminium and steel is about $1bn annually, which represents less than 1 per cent of all exports.
The Opposition Leader has responded to Mr Albanese’s comments that he was “photocopying” or “borrowing” policies from abroad, in a clear attempt to link the Coalition leader and the US President, by describing such language as needless “sledging”.
As he faces the prospect of taking over the nation’s relationship with the US, Mr Dutton on Sunday brushed aside suggestions of deploying Mr Morrison into Australia’s embassy or in any other role that could benefit the Canberra-Washington relationship.
“I’ve got high praise for Scott … but as I’ve pointed out before, we’ve got an ambassador in place and I want that ambassador to be successful,” he said.
“When we were in government, we were able to negotiate the AUKUS arrangement as a Coalition government with a Democratic administration, and we did that, respectfully, negotiating hard, and we got the fantastic outcome for our country.”
Despite Mr Morrison having posted a ringing endorsement of the new Liberal leader on LinkedIn last Friday, who he said he “strongly supported”, Mr Dutton did not respond when asked whether he believed he wouldn’t need the former prime minister’s help to seek trade exemptions from the Trump administration.
“I strongly believe that I will be able to drive a competitive deal with Australia in our negotiations with the US,” he said.
“We were able to negotiate with the Trump administration (during the Turnbull government) and make sure that Australia was spared from the tariffs. Now Mr Albanese hasn’t been able to do that because it’s not just in Australia that Mr Albanese is seen as weak, but he’s also seen as weak on the world stage.”
Mr Dutton made the comments at an Austral brickworks factory in the Labor-held western Sydney seat of McMahon, where employees said they were concerned over the flow-on impacts of looming economic and trade decisions by the US on local industry.
Hope that Mr Trump could grant Australia any exemptions in his upcoming round of reciprocal tariffs have been dwindling among senior government figures, who told The Australian earlier this month that the US President appeared “hellbent” on sweeping trade sanctions.
With the first full week of the election campaign set to be dominated by the outcome of the US tariffs decision on Wednesday, Mr Albanese said Australian officials were still seeking to engage with the Trump administration.
“What we’re doing is engaging through officials,” he told ABC on Sunday. “What happens at the leadership level consistently is that (we) have attempted to get an agreement. If we have an agreement, we will have a face-to-face or one-on-one discussion.”
https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/election-2025-i-dont-need-scott-morrison-to-take-on-trump-says-dutton/news-story/347c714829b6042dd8465f087027cb6d
https://www.linkedin.com/posts/scottmorrisonmp_it-is-not-my-usual-practice-to-engage-in-activity-7311215788902817792-bzdT
https://x.com/ScoMo30/status/1874317282933108747
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50849
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22845480 (310906ZMAR25) Notable: Video: ‘Interrupt, disrupt, expose’: Plan to drive MPs from Sydney’s mosques - A video mocking Immigration Minister Tony Burke for “scurrying like a rat” out of a community meeting appears to be the first salvo from a Palestine activist group that is promising to drive government and opposition MPs out of western Sydney. Anger over Israel’s war in Gaza has left MPs in the city’s west wary of a febrile atmosphere turning confrontational, as police ramp up election security to counter record threats against politicians. Labor’s education minister and campaign spokesman Jason Clare on Sunday said a video “basically threatened Tony Burke”, who is also Labor’s home affairs minister. “That’s not how democracy is done in Australia,” Clare said. Burke had been expected to speak at an Islamic prayer event at Parry Park in Lakemba, in his electorate of Watson, on March 21. However, the federal police agents escorting Burke were told that a text message had circulated instructing pro-Palestine activists to confront him at the event, and the minister chose to leave. One activist posted a video, filmed outside the prayer meeting and uploaded by activist account Stand4Palestine, saying Burke had left “scurrying like a rat” without addressing the crowd. “So Tony Burke, I want you to know that you are not welcome within our community, and to every single politician who is silent or complicit in the genocide in Gaza, don’t you dare show your faces in front of us,” the activist said. There is no police investigation into the video and no suggestion it contained a criminal threat against Burke.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50819
>>50833
>>50842
‘Interrupt, disrupt, expose’: Plan to drive MPs from Sydney’s mosques
Perry Duffin - March 30, 2025
A video mocking Immigration Minister Tony Burke for “scurrying like a rat” out of a community meeting appears to be the first salvo from a Palestine activist group that is promising to drive government and opposition MPs out of western Sydney.
Anger over Israel’s war in Gaza has left MPs in the city’s west wary of a febrile atmosphere turning confrontational, as police ramp up election security to counter record threats against politicians.
Labor’s education minister and campaign spokesman Jason Clare on Sunday said a video “basically threatened Tony Burke”, who is also Labor’s home affairs minister.
“That’s not how democracy is done in Australia,” Clare said.
Burke had been expected to speak at an Islamic prayer event at Parry Park in Lakemba, in his electorate of Watson, on March 21.
However, the federal police agents escorting Burke were told that a text message had circulated instructing pro-Palestine activists to confront him at the event, and the minister chose to leave.
One activist posted a video, filmed outside the prayer meeting and uploaded by activist account Stand4Palestine, saying Burke had left “scurrying like a rat” without addressing the crowd.
“So Tony Burke, I want you to know that you are not welcome within our community, and to every single politician who is silent or complicit in the genocide in Gaza, don’t you dare show your faces in front of us,” the activist said.
There is no police investigation into the video and no suggestion it contained a criminal threat against Burke.
“I’ve worked closely and respectfully with all my local communities for 20 years,” Burke told this masthead on Sunday.
It now appears the plan to confront the minister was just the first of an organised tactic to cut politicians off from mosques during the weekend’s Eid celebrations and the election campaign.
On Sunday, Stand4Palestine called on mosques not to host politicians who supported Israel, saying they were “complicit in genocide”.
“It’s betrayal,” the group wrote.
“If they dare to show up, interrupt them, disrupt them, expose them, record them.
“This is not disrespect. This is justice. Not welcome in our sacred spaces.”
The social media post includes images of Burke, Clare, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and Liberal leader Peter Dutton, Photoshopped alongside Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.
Followers of Stand4Palestine routinely denounce Labor figures, including Burke and Clare, while expressing support for independents backed by Muslim grassroots groups running in their western Sydney seats.
Burke’s seat of Watson and Clare’s seat of Blaxland are top priorities, given the large number of Muslim voters.
By Sunday evening, other accounts were bombarding Sydney mosques online.
“If you attend Eid prayers today or tomorrow and there is a politician there, don’t allow them to speak!” one Granville resident wrote, sharing information about Clare and Dutton’s plans to speak at two mosques in Sydney.
“My father … was blocked for expressing his opinion about rumours of Jason Clare being invited to Eid. And his comment was deleted. Shame,” another said.
While most people called for “peaceful” albeit disruptive protests to keep politicians out of the community, some followers described Burke and Clare as “rats”, “vermin” and “scum”.
One person said they wished to physically kick a politician like a dog, while another called for them to be gassed.
Threats to high office holders, federal MPs, dignitaries and electorate officers have grown dramatically over recent years, AFP Commissioner Reese Kershaw said last week.
There were more than 1000 threats in 2023-24, and in this financial year, it was likely there would be far more, he said.
“In the past 13 weeks, we have charged six men, in five separate incidents, for allegedly threatening parliamentarians and one man for allegedly threatening a political organisation,” Kershaw said.
Security agencies say conspiratorial, polarised thoughts took root in large swathes of the general population during the COVID-19 pandemic, and issues of great division, such as Palestine, have become flashpoints.
“The normalisation of violent protest and intimidating behaviour lowered the threshold for provocative and potentially violent acts,” ASIO director-general Mike Burgess said last month.
https://www.theage.com.au/national/nsw/interrupt-disrupt-expose-plan-to-drive-mps-from-sydney-s-mosques-20250330-p5lnmp.html
https://www.instagram.com/stand4palestineaus/reel/DHdc5KGzctG/
https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=982467100760996
https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=982467104094329
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50850
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22850566 (010854ZAPR25) Notable: Federal election 2025: Peter Dutton takes on ‘woke’ schools funding Peter Dutton is facing a potential schools funding war if he is elected in May, as NSW pushes back against the Opposition Leader’s suggestions he will use federal funding to prevent students from being “indoctrinated” with political agendas. Mr Dutton on Tuesday said a Coalition government would “reflect community standards in relation to what is being taught at our schools and our universities”. Citing a recent controversy about a law course at Macquarie University that marked students on their delivery of an acknowledgement of country and protests attended by school teachers, Mr Dutton said in outer Melbourne that this was being “translated into the classroom”. He said in a separate interview late on Monday night that “we should be saying to states and be saying to those who receive that funding that we want our kids to be taught the curriculum and what our kids need to take on as they face the challenges of the world”. “That’s the way the federal government can try to influence the NSW government or the Victorian government, whatever it might be,” he told Sky News.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50833
>>50803
>>50826
>>50827
Federal election 2025: Peter Dutton takes on ‘woke’ schools funding
NOAH YIM - 1 April 2025
Peter Dutton is facing a potential schools funding war if he is elected in May, as NSW pushes back against the Opposition Leader’s suggestions he will use federal funding to prevent students from being “indoctrinated” with political agendas.
Mr Dutton on Tuesday said a Coalition government would “reflect community standards in relation to what is being taught at our schools and our universities”.
Citing a recent controversy about a law course at Macquarie University that marked students on their delivery of an acknowledgement of country and protests attended by school teachers, Mr Dutton said in outer Melbourne that this was being “translated into the classroom”.
He said in a separate interview late on Monday night that “we should be saying to states and be saying to those who receive that funding that we want our kids to be taught the curriculum and what our kids need to take on as they face the challenges of the world”.
“That’s the way the federal government can try to influence the NSW government or the Victorian government, whatever it might be,” he told Sky News.
NSW Labor Education Minister Prue Car fired back, accusing Mr Dutton of politicising education.
Federal Education Minister Jason Clare said Mr Dutton had signed off on the current curriculum under the previous Morrison government and that this was a part of a “bigger agenda … to cut funding from our schools”.
“Given the significant reform NSW has undertaken in delivering its own, nation leading, clear, cohesive and explicit curriculum, I’m reluctant to impose more unnecessary workload onto our hard-working and dedicated teachers for the sake of Peter Dutton’s attempt to politicise our kids’ education,” Ms Car told The Australian.
“It is concerning that Peter Dutton, potentially the next prime minister, is criticising a national curriculum that was signed off by the Liberals and Nationals when he was sitting around the cabinet table.
“We would be happy to brief Peter Dutton on the nation-leading work we are doing here in NSW given he is clearly not across these issues.”
Mr Dutton also cast doubt on the continued scope of the Department of Education and Sky News that “the commonwealth government doesn’t own or run a school and which is why people ask why we’ve got a department of thousands and thousands of people in Canberra called the Education Department if we don’t have a school and don’t employ a teacher”.
Mr Clare said this showed Mr Dutton was threatening “abolishing the department of education”.
“This is the thin edge of the wedge,” he said.
“Peter Dutton’s bigger agenda is to cut funding from our schools. That’s what the Liberals always do.
“This time they will cut funding from our schools to pay for the $600bn of nuclear reactors.”
https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/federal-election-2025-peter-dutton-takes-on-woke-schools-funding/news-story/a6fbe7a4393cd9de77962fcee5389152
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50851
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22850578 (010904ZAPR25) Notable: Video: Liberal frontbencher heckled out of Melbourne mosque - Liberal frontbencher Jason Wood was heckled out of a Melbourne mosque while pledging $6.5 million to upgrade its facilities on Monday, after worshippers became furious their Eid celebrations were being politicised during the federal election campaign. Wood, who is the Coalition’s shadow minister for multicultural affairs, was at the event with local Liberal candidate for the Melbourne seat of Bruce, Zahid Safi, when hundreds of people in the crowd of thousands gathered for prayer at Dandenong Showgrounds stood up in anger. Several videos circulating on social media show people heckling, yelling, standing up and leaving, while another shows a physical fight breaking out. One clip includes footage of Wood being escorted out amid the commotion. “You’re not welcome here, brother, get out of here,” the man filming yells out to Wood as he passes. The backlash came a day after Opposition Leader Peter Dutton spent his second day on the campaign trail visiting a mosque in the outer Sydney suburb of Leppington, where he pledged $25,000 for CCTV cameras as the Coalition courts voters in ethnically and religiously diverse communities. But Dutton has faced regular condemnation from Islamic leaders for his comments on immigration and his unwavering support for Israel during the war in Gaza, making his recent push into those communities a challenging task among Muslim voters, in particular.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50819
>>50833
>>50842
Liberal frontbencher heckled out of Melbourne mosque
Natassia Chrysanthos - March 31, 2025
1/2
Liberal frontbencher Jason Wood was heckled out of a Melbourne mosque while pledging $6.5 million to upgrade its facilities on Monday, after worshippers became furious their Eid celebrations were being politicised during the federal election campaign.
Wood, who is the Coalition’s shadow minister for multicultural affairs, was at the event with local Liberal candidate for the Melbourne seat of Bruce, Zahid Safi, when hundreds of people in the crowd of thousands gathered for prayer at Dandenong Showgrounds stood up in anger.
Several videos circulating on social media show people heckling, yelling, standing up and leaving, while another shows a physical fight breaking out. One clip includes footage of Wood being escorted out amid the commotion.
“You’re not welcome here, brother, get out of here,” the man filming yells out to Wood as he passes.
The backlash came a day after Opposition Leader Peter Dutton spent his second day on the campaign trail visiting a mosque in the outer Sydney suburb of Leppington, where he pledged $25,000 for CCTV cameras as the Coalition courts voters in ethnically and religiously diverse communities.
But Dutton has faced regular condemnation from Islamic leaders for his comments on immigration and his unwavering support for Israel during the war in Gaza, making his recent push into those communities a challenging task among Muslim voters, in particular.
During Dutton’s mosque tour on Sunday, its leaders stressed that they were not endorsing the opposition leader and did not agree with all his past remarks about Muslim Australians.
Fallout from Monday’s event in Dandenong, which was facilitated by the Afghan Islamic Centre and Omar Farooq Mosque, has divided members of south-east Melbourne’s Afghan community.
Many were upset about what they saw as political interference in a celebration for the end of the holy month of Ramadan while others defended the funding announcement as a positive step.
Some people who attended the Eid prayer and protested were also associated with the activist group Stand for Palestine, which is discouraging mosques in western Sydney from inviting senior Labor ministers to Eid events. Labor is also facing a backlash from Muslim voters in its western Sydney strongholds who don’t think it has done enough to support Palestinians.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50852
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22850621 (010951ZAPR25) Notable: Video: Election 2025 - Malcolm Turnbull’s security forum questions the alliance in the era of Donald Trump - "Malcolm Turnbull’s Sovereignty and Security forum in Canberra has showcased a group of frustrated national security rebels who believe Donald Trump’s America requires a fundamental reappraisal of the nature of the US alliance. I say “rebels” because many of the 100-plus experts - including former ministers, diplomats and defence officials – invited by the former prime minister aired views which both major parties will comprehensively shun during this election campaign. These included abandoning the AUKUS nuclear submarine deal, distancing Australia from Washington in foreign affairs and defence, and arguing that China is not the regional bully it is made out to be. As such, it felt a little like the Defence version of World Series Cricket or LIV Golf - a breakaway policy game occurring in parallel to the real political contest. The forum was set up by Turnbull, who accuses, unfairly I think, Anthony Albanese and Peter Dutton of taking a cowardly approach to dealing with Trump. It’s much easier to talk tough about Trump without the responsibilities that come with leadership. “We will be confronting tough realities that, regrettably, both sides of politics in Australia presently prefer to ignore,” Turnbull said to begin the forum. Turnbull seemed to enjoy his self-appointed role of chief disrupter for the day. Will it change the dial in this policy debate? Probably not. Was it a Turnbull vanity project? Partly, but that doesn’t mean it wasn’t worthwhile. Will it have an impact on who wins this election? Absolutely not." - Cameron Stewart - theaustralian.com.au
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50771
>>>/qresearch/22657835
>>>/qresearch/22840864
Election 2025: Malcolm Turnbull’s security forum questions the alliance in the era of Donald Trump
CAMERON STEWART - March 31, 2025
1/2
Malcolm Turnbull’s Sovereignty and Security forum in Canberra has showcased a group of frustrated national security rebels who believe Donald Trump’s America requires a fundamental reappraisal of the nature of the US alliance.
I say “rebels” because many of the 100-plus experts – including former ministers, diplomats and defence officials – invited by the former prime minister aired views which both major parties will comprehensively shun during this election campaign.
These included abandoning the AUKUS nuclear submarine deal, distancing Australia from Washington in foreign affairs and defence, and arguing that China is not the regional bully it is made out to be.
As such, it felt a little like the Defence version of World Series Cricket or LIV Golf – a breakaway policy game occurring in parallel to the real political contest.
But that’s not to say it wasn’t a useful exercise, because debate on national security should always be welcomed regardless of people’s views. And there were enough contrarian views on the stage and in the audience to test assumptions, raise voices and elevate the blood pressure between the opposing teams, best categorised as the Hawks and the Doves.
The forum was set up by Turnbull, who accuses, unfairly I think, Anthony Albanese and Peter Dutton of taking a cowardly approach to dealing with Trump. It’s much easier to talk tough about Trump without the responsibilities that come with leadership.
“We will be confronting tough realities that, regrettably, both sides of politics in Australia presently prefer to ignore,” Turnbull said to begin the forum.
Many of the speakers were carefully chosen by Turnbull to air world views similar to his own – that AUKUS is bad and Trump’s America requires a rethink of foreign and defence policy.
But that was no surprise and proved to be a good starting point for pushback from those who disagreed. Turnbull, a ferocious AUKUS critic after the nuclear pact torpedoed his French submarine deal, repeatedly told the forum he believes Australia is almost certain to end up with no submarines because the AUKUS pact will collapse. At one point we saw a tense encounter between former defence secretary Dennis Richardson and Turnbull when Richardson chided Turnbull for assuming – as a fact – that America will break its promise to sell nuclear powered Virginia-class submarines to Australia.
“I think there is a good chance we will get (the subs),” said Richardson, adding that “we may fail, but I don’t think the fact that we may fail should become a certainty that we should”.
To which a testy Turnbull shot back: “I’m sorry for asking difficult questions.”
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50853
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22855280 (020806ZAPR25) Notable: Election 2025: Peter Dutton moves to calm his anxious troops after bumpy campaign start - Peter Dutton has sought to rally Coalition MPs nervous about the party’s performance and the drop in the Opposition Leader’s personal approval ratings, assuring those worried that the Coalition had not convinced voters of its message that “You haven’t seen anything yet”. The Australian on Monday revealed internal concerns over the performance of the Coalition, with MPs admitting they believed the party was still lacking solid economic policies while former deputy prime minister Michael McCormack said it was clear there was “a lot of work to do” before May 3. Mr Dutton on Tuesday hit back at suggestions his campaign had not started off well, declaring it was too early to make any judgment on the Coalition’s performance. “I don’t think you’ve seen anything yet - wait until we get into this campaign and you will see more of what we’ve got to offer,” the Liberal leader said when confronted with the critiques from within his own party. “I will lead a team into the next election, which is experienced and which has the ability not just to clean up Labor’s mess, but to implement our positive plan.”
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50833
>>50846
Election 2025: Peter Dutton moves to calm his anxious troops after bumpy campaign start
SARAH ISON - April 01, 2025
1/2
Peter Dutton has sought to rally Coalition MPs nervous about the party’s performance and the drop in the Opposition Leader’s personal approval ratings, assuring those worried that the Coalition had not convinced voters of its message that “You haven’t seen anything yet”.
The Australian on Monday revealed internal concerns over the performance of the Coalition, with MPs admitting they believed the party was still lacking solid economic policies while former deputy prime minister Michael McCormack said it was clear there was “a lot of work to do” before May 3.
Mr Dutton on Tuesday hit back at suggestions his campaign had not started off well, declaring it was too early to make any judgment on the Coalition’s performance.
“I don’t think you’ve seen anything yet – wait until we get into this campaign and you will see more of what we’ve got to offer,” the Liberal leader said when confronted with the critiques from within his own party.
“I will lead a team into the next election, which is experienced and which has the ability not just to clean up Labor’s mess, but to implement our positive plan.”
The concerns from Liberal MPs revealed on Monday came despite what was described by members of the party as a “witch hunt” for those responsible for sharing with The Australian last month their views that the Coalition needed to better articulate its economic plan.
Liberal MPs have also warned that while voters knew they didn’t like the government, they weren’t clear on what the Coalition offered.
Mr Dutton on Tuesday sought to highlight differences between himself and Anthony Albanese.
“You will see the difference between the two parties by election day,” he said during a visit to the safe Victorian Labor-held seat of Calwell in northern Melbourne.
“You will see a prime ministerial candidate who will be able to protect and defend our country when the Prime Minister is too weak to do so.
“You will see a prime ministerial candidate who is able to make the decisions required to get our economy back on track and to reduce inflation to make sure that we can restore the dream of home ownership where the Prime Minister has taken that dream away from Australians.”
He also issued a warning to small business over Labor’s tax agenda, saying the government would “charge you a tax” on unrealised capital gains in their super funds.
Labor has committed to increasing the concessional tax rate on super funds worth over $3m should it be re-elected, with Mr Dutton arguing that business owners who put their businesses or property in their super funds could be forced to sell the assets.
“Labor is going to charge you a tax – levy a tax against your super fund just because the value of that property goes up,” he said.
Despite calls from Coalition backbenchers for the party to lower the superannuation guarantee to 9 per cent, allowing workers to pocket retirement payments, Mr Dutton said he had no plans for such a policy.
“There are no changes to superannuation,” he said.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50862
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22855312 (020816ZAPR25) Notable: Coalition pledges to weed out ‘activism’ in universities - The Coalition has pledged to wipe out “woke” activism and “ideological agendas” in universities through an unprecedented level of ministerial intervention in course content. Opposition education spokeswoman Sarah Henderson, spelling out the Coalition’s higher education policy for the first time during the election campaign, said she would direct the Tertiary Quality Education Quality and Standards Agency to take action against “indoctrination’’. “I am concerned that some courses are being impacted by teachings which are designed to drive political agendas,” Senator Henderson told The Australian. “For instance, Macquarie University should be more focused on genuine academic performance rather than penalising students if they don’t complete a ‘privilege walk’ or perform a ‘thoughtful and culturally respectful’ acknowledgment of country at the beginning of an oral law exam. “Universities must be places of higher learning, not indoctrination.”
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50833
>>50850
>>>/qresearch/22850614
Coalition pledges to weed out ‘activism’ in universities
NATASHA BITA and NOAH YIM - 1 April 2025
1/2
he Coalition has pledged to wipe out “woke” activism and “ideological agendas” in universities through an unprecedented level of ministerial intervention in course content.
Opposition education spokeswoman Sarah Henderson, spelling out the Coalition’s higher education policy for the first time during the election campaign, said she would direct the Tertiary Quality Education Quality and Standards Agency to take action against “indoctrination’’.
“I am concerned that some courses are being impacted by teachings which are designed to drive political agendas,” Senator Henderson told The Australian.
“For instance, Macquarie University should be more focused on genuine academic performance rather than penalising students if they don’t complete a ‘privilege walk’ or perform a ‘thoughtful and culturally respectful’ acknowledgment of country at the beginning of an oral law exam.
“Universities must be places of higher learning, not indoctrination.”
Senator Henderson’s warning came as federal Education Minister Jason Clare welcomed the closure of Chinese government-sponsored Confucius Institutes in five Australian universities.
The University of Queensland, University of NSW, RMIT University, University of Melbourne and University of Western Australia have all shut down the Chinese-funded cultural centres, while the University of Adelaide is refusing to say if its institute has been shut down.
The Trump administration, meanwhile, has pulled funding from researchers at eight Australian universities after sending them a questionnaire asking if they have links to China – including Confucius Institutes.
Senator Henderson said on Tuesday that, if elected, a Dutton government would use “existing mechanisms’’ to ask TEQSA to investigate the quality of teaching and content in individual university degrees.
“TEQSA, as the regulator, already has the authority to examine the quality and appropriateness of course content,’’ she said.
“The law also allows the minister to request that TEQSA advise and make recommendations regarding the quality of higher education providers.”
The Australian understands that Senator Henderson also plans to force universities to publish detailed course outlines, so students know what they are signing up for before they enrol in a degree.
Currently, most universities provide such broad-brushed course summaries that students do not discover detailed course requirements until after they start university.
The Coalition’s war on woke teaching also extends to schools, after Opposition Leader Peter Dutton said he would use federal funding to prevent students being “indoctrinated’’ in classrooms.
He said a Coalition government would “reflect community standards in relation to what is being taught at our schools and our universities”.
Citing a recent controversy about a law course at Macquarie University that marked students on their delivery of an acknowledgment of country, and protests attended by school teachers, Mr Dutton said on Tuesday that this was being “translated into the classroom”.
“That’s not something I support,’’ he said.
“I support young Australians being able to think freely, being able to assess what’s before them, and not being told and indoctrinated with something that is the agenda of others, and that’s the approach that we would take.’’
In an interview on Monday night, Mr Dutton said “we should be saying to states … who receive that (federal) funding that we want our kids to be taught the curriculum, and what our kids need to take on as they face the challenges of the world”.
“That’s the way the federal government can try to influence the NSW government or the Victorian government, whatever it might be,” he told Sky News.
NSW Labor Education Minister Prue Car fired back, accusing Mr Dutton of politicising children’s education.
“Given the significant reform NSW has undertaken in delivering its own, nation-leading, clear, cohesive and explicit curriculum, I’m reluctant to impose more unnecessary workload on to our hardworking and dedicated teachers for the sake of Peter Dutton’s attempt to politicise our kids’ education,” Ms Car told The Australian.
“It is concerning that Peter Dutton, potentially the next prime minister, is criticising a national curriculum that was signed off by the Liberals and Nationals when he was sitting around the cabinet table.
“We would be happy to brief Peter Dutton on the nation-leading work we are doing here in NSW, given he is clearly not across these issues.”
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50863
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22855333 (020826ZAPR25) Notable: Election 2025: Coalition election plan to blitz teals and fight Climate 200 - Peter Dutton and senior Liberal figures are preparing campaign blitzes of teal-held seats and Coalition electorates targeted by independents, as new Climate 200 polling claims that Zoe Daniel has her nose in front of Tim Wilson in Goldstein. The blitz will align with campaign launches for Liberals who are fighting cashed-up teal MPs and candidates backed by resources and infrastructure supported by Simon Holmes a Court’s Climate 200. Deputy Opposition Leader Sussan Ley, who has made 40 visits to teal electorates since the 2022 election, will hit target seats including Goldstein, Kooyong, Curtin, Mackellar, Warringah and Wentworth over the next fortnight as part of a broader national tour. Ms Ley will join Liberal contenders for streetwalks and to spruik local project announcements, and will join Wentworth candidate Ro Knox and Warringah candidate Jaimee Rogers for their official campaign launches. As the Liberal Party steps up its “Teals Revealed” campaign amid confidence it can win back up to six teal and independent seats, Climate 200-commissioned uComms polling of 1225 voters in Goldstein between March 18 and 25 indicates that Ms Daniel holds a 54 to 46 per cent two-party-preferred vote lead in the Melbourne seat.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50833
>>50822
>>50841
Election 2025: Coalition election plan to blitz teals and fight Climate 200
GEOFF CHAMBERS - 2 April 2025
Peter Dutton and senior Liberal figures are preparing campaign blitzes of teal-held seats and Coalition electorates targeted by independents, as new Climate 200 polling claims that Zoe Daniel has her nose in front of Tim Wilson in Goldstein.
The blitz will align with campaign launches for Liberals who are fighting cashed-up teal MPs and candidates backed by resources and infrastructure supported by Simon Holmes a Court’s Climate 200. Deputy Opposition Leader Sussan Ley, who has made 40 visits to teal electorates since the 2022 election, will hit target seats including Goldstein, Kooyong, Curtin, Mackellar, Warringah and Wentworth over the next fortnight as part of a broader national tour.
Ms Ley will join Liberal contenders for streetwalks and to spruik local project announcements, and will join Wentworth candidate Ro Knox and Warringah candidate Jaimee Rogers for their official campaign launches.
As the Liberal Party steps up its “Teals Revealed” campaign amid confidence it can win back up to six teal and independent seats, Climate 200-commissioned uComms polling of 1225 voters in Goldstein between March 18 and 25 indicates that Ms Daniel holds a 54 to 46 per cent two-party-preferred vote lead in the Melbourne seat.
The polling revealed an improvement on a February 12-25 uComms poll of 979 Goldstein voters, which had the contest closer at 52 to 48 per cent. At the 2022 election, Ms Daniel beat Mr Wilson on a margin of 52.87 to 47.13 per cent.
The Climate 200 polling, which shows One Nation tripling its primary vote in Goldstein since the 2022 election, had Mr Wilson ahead of Ms Daniel on primary vote. The margin narrowed after uComms added undecided voters into the mix.
Despite the Climate 200 poll, Liberal sources said they believed Mr Wilson could oust Ms Daniel and were also hopeful of beating Kate Chaney in the Perth seat of Curtin and Monique Ryan in Kooyong. Mr Wilson, who held Goldstein between 2016 and 2022, has raised a sizeable war chest and amassed an army of volunteers in the electorate, which is home to about 11,000 Jewish-Australians.
The Coalition, which is fending off challenges from Climate 200-backed independents in Wannon and Cowper, is confident of winning Calare, Monash and Moore, which the Liberals and Nationals won in 2022 but are now considered independent after the crossbench defections of Andrew Gee, Russell Broadbent and Ian Goodenough. The trio are running at the May 3 election as independents and Climate 200 is also backing independents in the three seats.
Ms Ley, who will visit Goldstein next week, said: “Australians have been left poorer and less safe under the Albanese government and that has largely been enabled by the Climate 200 teals, who vote with Labor and the Greens more than 70 per cent of the time.
“At the start of this term, the Climate 200 teals said they would change Canberra, but at the end of the term it’s clear that Canberra has changed them. Instead of holding Anthony Albanese to account, many of the Climate 200 teals have spent their time, effort and resources opposing the opposition. A vote for a Climate 200 teal is a vote to keep Anthony Albanese as Prime Minister. The only way to change the government and change the country is to vote for your local Liberal.”
The Climate 200-backed independent running in Ms Ley’s seat of Farrer is expected to finish third behind the Labor candidate.
Senior Liberal MPs have attacked Climate 200 polls as “misleading push polling”, which they say is designed to favour hand-picked candidates and promote independents as frontrunners. Climate 200 has defended the uComms polls because the “message testing” is conducted after three neutral questions asking about voters’ ages, genders and voting intentions, which aligns with Australian Polling Council guidelines. The “pre-message vote intention” is shared publicly while the follow-up intention questions are used by Climate 200 to assess how voters respond to messaging and to inform strategic decisions.
Coalition campaign spokesman James Paterson said: “It’s going to be a very close election, it could come down to a handful of seats and the Prime Minister is already having to contemplate a possible minority government with the Greens and the teals.”
https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/coalition-election-plan-to-blitz-teals-and-fight-climate-200/news-story/e7b8f947440dd89835d597ee4a9d1775
https://www.tealsrevealed.com/
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50864
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22855384 (020843ZAPR25) Notable: Jacinta Allan’s sinking popularity inflicts brand damage on Albanese’s election hopes - Jacinta Allan’s sinking popularity has become a significant drag on federal Labor’s re-election hopes, as a new poll shows three out of four Victorian voters want someone else to be premier. The exclusive survey, conducted by Resolve Political Monitor for The Age, confirms support for state Labor has collapsed to emergency levels that will shape the federal political contest in Victoria. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and Opposition Leader Peter Dutton will campaign in Victoria on Wednesday. Primary support for state Labor was at 24 per cent in February and March, marginally above the 22 per cent nadir reached in the previous survey in December and January, but 12.6 points below its election-winning vote in November 2022. The state Coalition’s primary support is at 41 per cent, 1 point down on the previous survey. The latest survey of more than 1000 respondents found Allan’s personal standing with voters has continued to tank. Whereas 38 per cent of voters preferred her as premier when she took over the job from Daniel Andrews in October 2023, that figure has slumped to 23 per cent, her lowest recorded level of support. Her once-neutral “likeability” rating has cratered to minus 32 per cent, sliding 8 points since January. ALP strategists believe this helps explain why Victoria, a state which swung hard against the Coalition at the 2022 federal election, is Labor’s problem child in this campaign.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>>/qresearch/22544347 (pb)
>>50744
>>50833
Jacinta Allan’s sinking popularity inflicts brand damage on Albanese’s election hopes
Chip Le Grand and Paul Sakkal - April 2, 2025
1/2
Jacinta Allan’s sinking popularity has become a significant drag on federal Labor’s re-election hopes, as a new poll shows three out of four Victorian voters want someone else to be premier.
The exclusive survey, conducted by Resolve Political Monitor for The Age, confirms support for state Labor has collapsed to emergency levels that will shape the federal political contest in Victoria. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and Opposition Leader Peter Dutton will campaign in Victoria on Wednesday.
Primary support for state Labor was at 24 per cent in February and March, marginally above the 22 per cent nadir reached in the previous survey in December and January, but 12.6 points below its election-winning vote in November 2022.
The state Coalition’s primary support is at 41 per cent, 1 point down on the previous survey.
The latest survey of more than 1000 respondents found Allan’s personal standing with voters has continued to tank. Whereas 38 per cent of voters preferred her as premier when she took over the job from Daniel Andrews in October 2023, that figure has slumped to 23 per cent, her lowest recorded level of support.
Her once-neutral “likeability” rating has cratered to minus 32 per cent, sliding 8 points since January.
ALP strategists believe this helps explain why Victoria, a state which swung hard against the Coalition at the 2022 federal election, is Labor’s problem child in this campaign.
Resolve founder Jim Reed said his latest state survey results were consistent with trends detected by other polling companies.
“We, and now other pollsters, have been picking up Labor dropping to the low-mid 20s for primary vote,” he said. “That’s a really bad position to be in, and the strength of criticism in the comments suggests that there’s now a hatred of Labor in many parts of the electorate.
“This brand damage obviously impedes the Albanese government’s prospects in the state, which is why the campaign won’t feature the premier as they are in places like SA or NSW.”
Whereas in South Australia and NSW, premiers Peter Malinauskas and Chris Minns are seen as Labor assets, Allan has become a liability for her own party.
As Reed put it: “There are now loyal Labor voters supporting the party in spite of the leader, rather than because of her.”
According to Resolve’s latest national survey, published this week, Labor’s primary vote of 27 per cent in Victoria is 3 points below its primary support in NSW. At the 2022 federal election, Labor secured 33 per cent of the primary vote in Victoria. Resolve does not publish a two-party preferred figure.
Federal Labor ministers and campaigners, speaking confidentially to discuss internal party matters, said the party’s own research showed Victorian numbers worsening for Labor recently despite all other states improving for the government.
Labor is bracing for the potential loss of eight seats in Victoria. The Liberal Party is hoping to gain up to six.
Albanese, in comments to this masthead, urged voters to judge his government on its own record. The prime minister dismissed as a scare campaign plans by the Liberal Party to flood Victoria with advertisements seeking to associate federal Labor with Allan.
“People will make their own judgment, but what that says to me is that they don’t have any criticism of my government,” he said.
He offered faint praise for Allan, noting she led a government which had “built a lot”, saving his most scathing assessment for Dutton, referencing claims the opposition leader made in 2018 about Melbourne being unsafe after dark.
“Peter Dutton is the guy who has run campaigns against Victoria for a long time, including saying that they were scared to go out at night for dinner,” Albanese said. “He bagged Victorians and the effort they made during COVID. He’s someone who’s hostile to Victorians.”
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50865
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22874139 (060902ZAPR25) Notable: Election 2025: Palmer says he knows what Trump wants on tariffs - Billionaire miner and chair of political party Trumpet of Patriots Clive Palmer says he has been told by confidants of Donald Trump what the US President wants from Australia in exchange for dropping a 10 per cent tariff. “Apologise. What [Anthony Albanese] needs to do is apologise for the comments he made about the President. You might think this is minor but it’s an important thing if you know Trump,” Mr Palmer said. The Prime Minister took a veiled swipe at Mr Trump’s handling of economics last week, saying he understood in year 7 that border taxes hurt the country that imposed them more. “Kevin Rudd called President Trump ‘the village idiot’. If you were the President of the US and you were called the ‘village idiot’ by the ambassador, you wouldn’t be too happy with that. I think Donald Trump remembers that so it’s very appropriate that the ambassador also apologise and on behalf of Australia. Rudd should probably resign,” he said. Mr Palmer, who funded a two-week speaking trip to Australia for Trump supporter and television host Tucker Carlson last year, said there was also animosity towards the Albanese government from the Trump camp because of a controversial delay in granting the President’s son a travel visa to Australia in 2023. Visas for high-profile people usually take longer to clear national security vetting. “It was a fiasco when Donald Trump’s son wanted to visit Australia. All of the politicians argued whether they would issue a visa or not. Australia should apologise about that. If it was your son and you were standing for president and everyone’s against you and don’t think you’re going to get elected president and you’re under threat from lawfare, you won’t forget at that time when people come out and kick you,” Mr Palmer said.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50833
>>>/qresearch/22860237
>>50779
Election 2025: Palmer says he knows what Trump wants on tariffs
MATTHEW CRANSTON and GEOFF CHAMBERS - 6 April 2025
Billionaire miner and chair of political party Trumpet of Patriots Clive Palmer says he has been told by confidants of Donald Trump what the US President wants from Australia in exchange for dropping a 10 per cent tariff.
“Apologise. What [Anthony Albanese] needs to do is apologise for the comments he made about the President. You might think this is minor but it’s an important thing if you know Trump,” Mr Palmer said.
The Prime Minister took a veiled swipe at Mr Trump’s handling of economics last week, saying he understood in year 7 that border taxes hurt the country that imposed them more.
“Kevin Rudd called President Trump ‘the village idiot’. If you were the President of the US and you were called the ‘village idiot’ by the ambassador, you wouldn’t be too happy with that. I think Donald Trump remembers that so it’s very appropriate that the ambassador also apologise and on behalf of Australia. Rudd should probably resign,” he said.
Mr Palmer, who funded a two-week speaking trip to Australia for Trump supporter and television host Tucker Carlson last year, said there was also animosity towards the Albanese government from the Trump camp because of a controversial delay in granting the President’s son a travel visa to Australia in 2023. Visas for high-profile people usually take longer to clear national security vetting.
“It was a fiasco when Donald Trump’s son wanted to visit Australia. All of the politicians argued whether they would issue a visa or not. Australia should apologise about that. If it was your son and you were standing for president and everyone’s against you and don’t think you’re going to get elected president and you’re under threat from lawfare, you won’t forget at that time when people come out and kick you,” Mr Palmer said.
The billionaire, who once owned a cattle herd in western Queensland before buying up 200 quarter horses with US bloodlines, said Australia also needed to drop “fake” biosecurity rules that prevented American beef from being imported to Australia.
“Mad cow disease was in the US in 2006 but the reality is it has been certified as being eradicated. Other countries had the same biosecurity concerns in 2006-07, but they’ve all gone through the testing and there has been no cases ever since. So Australia’s really using it to keep out competition.
“The demand for beef in the US is very high, they need our exports. It’s unlikely we’ll be getting any beef from them anyway.
“If you’re friends, you should treat each other equally. I think if Australia could give the same rights of entry to US beef that we enjoy to the US, that would go a long way to helping the tariffs.”
The major US beef lobby, National Cattlemen’s Beef Association, in March said the US should consider implementing volume-based safeguards on fresh and frozen imports of beef from Australia and initiate a full audit of Australian animal health standards for cattle and beef products.
“This should also take into account the rate of rejected shipments at US Customs over the past five years, and if necessary, increase inspection rates to 100 per cent until audits are conducted to confirm systemic problems have been resolved.”
Foreign Minister Penny Wong on Sunday said standards on imported beef were not for the turning. “We will not compromise on Australia’s biosecurity,” she said.
https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/election-2025-palmer-says-he-knows-what-trump-wants-on-tariffs/news-story/cdcd0fc608b57f9a331823207cc862f4
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50866
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22877863 (070949ZAPR25) Notable: Coalition axes working from home, forced redundancies policies in attempt to reboot Peter Dutton’s campaign - Peter Dutton will dump his demands that public servants return to the office and will not hand out any forced redundancies to taxpayer-funded workers, in a backflip designed to reboot the Opposition Leader’s campaign and win back female voters. With Mr Dutton losing his months-long polling edge against Anthony Albanese amid growing Liberal concerns over his campaign strategy, The Australian understands Liberal candidates in key seats were reporting significant hostility towards the return-to-the-office policy from voters, and particularly among women. In a stark departure from the Coalition’s policy just a month ago when its public service spokesman, Jane Hume, said “all members of the APS work from the office five days a week”, there is now no expectation on the number of days in the office. Senator Hume on Monday will reverse course and will ensure there is no mandated minimum number of days for public servants to work in the office. “Many professional men and women in the commonwealth public service are benefiting from flexible working arrangements, including working from home, which allow them to make valuable contributions to serving Australians,” she said in a statement. “We have listened, and understand that flexible work, including working from home, is part of getting the best out of any workforce.”
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50833
>>50846
>>50853
Coalition axes working from home, forced redundancies policies in attempt to reboot Peter Dutton’s campaign
MATTHEW CRANSTON and SIMON BENSON - 6 April 2025
1/2
Peter Dutton will dump his demands that public servants return to the office and will not hand out any forced redundancies to taxpayer-funded workers, in a backflip designed to reboot the Opposition Leader’s campaign and win back female voters.
The Coalition will on Monday unveil a five-year plan to reduce the bureaucracy by 41,000 people through hiring freezes and not always replacing workers who retire or resign.
After months of confusion over how the Coalition would slash public servant numbers, and the weaponisation of the Opposition Leader’s criticism of bureaucrats working from home, The Australian understands the jettisoning of a return-to-the-office policy was part of “cleaning up” the negativities of Mr Dutton’s campaign.
Only last month he said he did not believe that “61 per cent of the public servants who are working in Canberra should be working from home”.
“I think they should return to work, back to pre-Covid levels which was just over 20 per cent of people who work from home, so we could help people get that balance in their lives, but also deliver efficiency in the way in which they are expending the money that’s given them by Australian taxpayers,” he said at the time.
But with Mr Dutton losing his months-long polling edge against Anthony Albanese amid growing Liberal concerns over his campaign strategy, The Australian understands Liberal candidates in key seats were reporting significant hostility towards the return-to-the-office policy from voters, and particularly among women.
A senior Coalition source confirmed there had been a realisation at the top levels there was a lack of “sharpness” about what the Liberals and Nationals’ proposition was.
As the Coalition aimed on Sunday to narrow the electorate’s focus on its plan to reduce migration and end the housing crisis, one Liberal source said the turn-a-round on the public service policy was “a pragmatic U-turn”.
In a stark departure from the Coalition’s policy just a month ago when its public service spokesman, Jane Hume, said “all members of the APS work from the office five days a week”, there is now no expectation on the number of days in the office.
Senator Hume on Monday will reverse course and will ensure there is no mandated minimum number of days for public servants to work in the office. “Many professional men and women in the commonwealth public service are benefiting from flexible working arrangements, including working from home, which allow them to make valuable contributions to serving Australians,” she said in a statement. “We have listened, and understand that flexible work, including working from home, is part of getting the best out of any workforce.”
Senator Hume had previously said that remote work arrangements had become unsustainable and unproductive.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50867
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22877878 (070958ZAPR25) Notable: Richard Marles coy on future role amid speculation of Penny Wong retirement - Richard Marles has refused to commit to serving a full term as Defence Minister if Labor wins the election, amid speculation Penny Wong will retire and Mr Marles will take the Foreign Affairs portfolio. Mr Marles said he’d wanted to serve as Defence Minister in Labor’s first term, and “I’ve almost completed the job”. He said he would not pre-empt any future role if the Albanese government was returned on May 3. “We’ve got an election to win, and that’s our focus,” he said on Monday. “So the last thing I’m about to do is start speculating on what happens after the election.” Senator Wong’s political future has been the subject of persistent rumours in Canberra and her hometown Adelaide, with multiple senior Labor sources saying she plans to leave politics within six months, no matter the poll result. They say after 24 years in parliament, she wants to spend more time with wife Sophie Allouache and their daughters Alexandra and Hannah. The government rejects such talk, saying Senator Wong has no intention to retire and Labor’s national security team will be unchanged after the election. Senator Wong, one of Labor’s strongest performers, has played a low-key role in the campaign.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50833
>>50846
Richard Marles coy on future role amid speculation of Penny Wong retirement
BEN PACKHAM - 7 April 2025
Richard Marles has refused to commit to serving a full term as Defence Minister if Labor wins the election, amid speculation Penny Wong will retire and Mr Marles will take the Foreign Affairs portfolio.
Mr Marles said he’d wanted to serve as Defence Minister in Labor’s first term, and “I’ve almost completed the job”.
He said he would not pre-empt any future role if the Albanese government was returned on May 3. “We’ve got an election to win, and that’s our focus,” he said on Monday. “So the last thing I’m about to do is start speculating on what happens after the election.”
Senator Wong’s political future has been the subject of persistent rumours in Canberra and her hometown Adelaide, with multiple senior Labor sources saying she plans to leave politics within six months, no matter the poll result.
They say after 24 years in parliament, she wants to spend more time with wife Sophie Allouache and their daughters Alexandra and Hannah.
The government rejects such talk, saying Senator Wong has no intention to retire and Labor’s national security team will be unchanged after the election.
Senator Wong’s purchase last year with Ms Allouache of a $3.4m mansion in one of Adelaide’s most exclusive suburbs has only added to the speculation.
Mr Marles, as Deputy Prime Minister, would have the right to choose his portfolio in a re-elected Albanese government.
Senior party sources say he is interested in the Foreign Ministry after successfully navigating the intense international diplomacy that comes with defence.
Defence Industry Minister Pat Conroy, widely respected for his command of the portfolio, would be expected to take the senior Defence Ministry under such circumstances.
Mr Marles said Labor had provided consistent leadership in Defence after the Coalition’s merry-go-round of six defence ministers during the Abbott, Turnbull and Morrison governments. “We’ve had one defence minister, as we said we would. I’ve almost completed the job in terms of this term.
“Now we’re focused on seeking our re-election, and really the questions that you’re asking are on the other side of that event, if we’re ultimately successful. But Australian people get a say in this first.”
Senator Wong, one of Labor’s strongest performers, has played a low-key role in the campaign.
https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/richard-marles-coy-on-future-role-amid-speculation-of-penny-wong-retirement/news-story/db38f19a6452bf81d8b77ee61b5ba57f
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50868
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22877883 (071004ZAPR25) Notable: Donald Trump trade deal with Australia off until after election, as embassy waits for Republican backlash - Australia’s embassy in Washington will wait to see if Anthony Albanese or Peter Dutton wins the May 3 election before re-entering talks with the Trump White House over tariff carve-outs, despite an expected markets bloodbath as soon as Monday and warnings from Europe that globalisation is dead. As both the Prime Minister and Opposition Leader prepare to face Donald Trump’s rewriting of the global economic order, one of Washington’s most controversial Senate powerbrokers is also warning them not to aggravate the President on tariffs. The Australian understands the nation’s diplomats will wait at least a month before approaching Mr Trump’s trade team over the removal or watering down of the 10 per cent blanket tariff. The embassy will be hoping for renewed authority from the next prime minister and an intensification of Republican backlash against the President’s radical economic policies and their impact on both the price of US goods and the stockmarket. In the event of a hung parliament, where Mr Albanese and Mr Dutton would need crossbench MPs to get into government, any hold-and-wait strategy from the embassy and US ambassador Kevin Rudd would take even longer before there is proper re-engagement.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50833
>>>/qresearch/22860237
>>>/qresearch/22860263
Donald Trump trade deal with Australia off until after election, as embassy waits for Republican backlash
MATTHEW CRANSTON - 6 April 2025
1/2
Australia’s embassy in Washington will wait to see if Anthony Albanese or Peter Dutton wins the May 3 election before re-entering talks with the Trump White House over tariff carve-outs, despite an expected markets bloodbath as soon as Monday and warnings from Europe that globalisation is dead.
As both the Prime Minister and Opposition Leader prepare to face Donald Trump’s rewriting of the global economic order, one of Washington’s most controversial Senate powerbrokers is also warning them not to aggravate the President on tariffs.
The Australian understands the nation’s diplomats will wait at least a month before approaching Mr Trump’s trade team over the removal or watering down of the 10 per cent blanket tariff. The embassy will be hoping for renewed authority from the next prime minister and an intensification of Republican backlash against the President’s radical economic policies and their impact on both the price of US goods and the stockmarket.
In the event of a hung parliament, where Mr Albanese and Mr Dutton would need crossbench MPs to get into government, any hold-and-wait strategy from the embassy and US ambassador Kevin Rudd would take even longer before there is proper re-engagement.
The revelation comes as investors expect a further roiling of stockmarkets this week, with US S&P 500 futures down more than 6 per cent, and the ASX 200 futures markets pricing in a 4.3 per cent fall on the local share market on Monday.
There has also been shift from British Prime Minister Keir Starmer, who is set to argue in a speech on Monday that “globalisation is over”, that he understood Mr Trump’s economic nationalism, its popularity with voters and their disbelief in the benefits of free trade.
Foreign Minister Penny Wong said on Sunday the Albanese government would not deal with Mr Trump on any of the key sticking points his administration gave for Australia being hit with a 10 per cent tariff last week.
“We will not compromise on the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme. We will not comprise on Australia’s biosecurity … plus some of our digital regulation, we are not going to compromise on what it is to be Australian,” she told the ABC.
Mr Albanese has said there would be no negotiation on any of the issues seen by the US as an “effective” tariff, and took a veiled swipe at Mr Trump’s handling of economics, saying he understood in year 7 that border taxes hurt the country that imposes them more.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50869
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22877895 (071012ZAPR25) Notable: Andrew Forrest’s election plea: ‘Force Meta to operate from Australia’ - Billionaire Andrew Forrest says whoever wins the federal election needs to force Facebook owner Meta to base its Australian operations via a local entity to stop it bypassing the country’s laws and facilitating organised crime. The resources boss is suing Meta in California after it failed to take down hundreds of thousands of scam advertisements featuring his likeness that have fleeced Australians of their life savings. Dr Forrest is suing Meta in California because it has attempted to use a 30-year-old US law that grants online companies immunity from what is posted on their sites and platforms. He has argued that Meta has “knowingly advertising the content of criminals” via this loophole, which he is now desperately trying to close, “no matter the cost”. “Australian sovereignty should be the most important factor when considering how to regulate foreign tech platforms that millions of Australians access,” Dr Forrest told The Australian. “Australia should be able to enforce our laws for all companies that do business in Australia, and Australian users should have access to our courts if they suffer from big tech’s behaviour. “I don’t think this is a political debate - it’s something all parties should agree on. Whoever forms government should act immediately to require digital platforms to operate through an Australian legal entity and be subject to Australian regulations and our legal system.” Dr Forrest said it was “completely unacceptable” that “innocent Australians who have lost thousands of dollars” currently have no way to seek compensation from Meta. “Australians should be in control of what happens in Australia - it’s as simple as that.”
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50833
>>50846
>>50815
Andrew Forrest’s election plea: ‘Force Meta to operate from Australia’
JARED LYNCH - 7 April 2025
1/2
Billionaire Andrew Forrest says whoever wins the federal election needs to force Facebook owner Meta to base its Australian operations via a local entity to stop it bypassing the country’s laws and facilitating organised crime.
The resources boss is suing Meta in California after it failed to take down hundreds of thousands of scam advertisements featuring his likeness that have fleeced Australians of their life savings.
Dr Forrest is suing Meta in California because it has attempted to use a 30-year-old US law that grants online companies immunity from what is posted on their sites and platforms.
He has argued that Meta has “knowingly advertising the content of criminals” via this loophole, which he is now desperately trying to close, “no matter the cost”.
“Australian sovereignty should be the most important factor when considering how to regulate foreign tech platforms that millions of Australians access,” Dr Forrest told The Australian.
“Australia should be able to enforce our laws for all companies that do business in Australia, and Australian users should have access to our courts if they suffer from big tech’s behaviour.
“I don’t think this is a political debate – it’s something all parties should agree on. Whoever forms government should act immediately to require digital platforms to operate through an Australian legal entity and be subject to Australian regulations and our legal system.”
Dr Forrest said it was “completely unacceptable” that “innocent Australians who have lost thousands of dollars” currently have no way to seek compensation from Meta.
“Australians should be in control of what happens in Australia – it’s as simple as that.”
A Meta spokeswoman declined to say what was on its policy wish list from the next Australian government.
In US Federal Court documents, Dr Forrest describes Meta’s position as “jurisdictional arbitrage”, drawing a parallel with the way the company shifts money from ad sales out of high-tax countries such as Australia to corporate tax haven Ireland.
The Australian Competition & Consumer Commission found Meta generated $4.7bn and $5.1bn in Australian advertising revenue from Facebook and Instagram, respectively, in FY21-22.
Dr Forrest wrote to Meta founder Mark Zuckerberg a decade ago, asking him to remove the scam advertisements but received no reply.
As a result of the lack of action, one Australian woman fell victim to a scam featuring Mr Forrest’s likeness and lost $670,000. Another man clicked on a link in a fraudulent Facebook add and was swindled out of $77,254, and a 72-year-old Western Australian known as “FZ” lost $250,000 – which he has not been able to recover.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50870
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22887580 (090949ZAPR25) Notable: Peter Dutton’s father Bruce rushed to hospital after heart attack hours before first debate - Peter Dutton has choked up talking about his “tough bugger” dad Bruce after the 80-year-old suffered a heart attack just before the leaders’ debate on Tuesday night. The Opposition Leader’s father Bruce Dutton was rushed to hospital in Queensland after suffering a heart attack, reportedly just one hour before the debate began. “He’s stoic. He’s a tough bugger. He’s worked hard all of his life, and he’s been an amazing dad,” an emotional Mr Dutton told reporters on the campaign trail in Sydney on Wednesday. “Of course you think about him. But he’s … fine and he’s doing well.” When asked if he return to Brisbane to visit his dad, he said he would monitor the situation. “I’ve spoken to Dad this morning, and I’ve got amazing siblings and my sisters are with dad at the moment so I will monitor that.” Mr Dutton revealed he considered pulling out of the first debate of the election campaign after learning of his 80-year-old dad’s medical incident. He was in a stable condition as of 9pm on Tuesday. Mr Dutton was informed of the incident just minutes before the debate was set to kick off. When asked how his father was faring during an appearance on Nova’s Fitzy, Wippa and Kate Ritchie show in Sydney, Mr Dutton said his dad’s health was good. “He is a great man, and he’ll be fine,” he said. “Look, I thought, ‘Do I pull out of the debate?’, but my sisters were up there with him and giving me regular reports, which was good. “He’s a great man, and I love him very much.”
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50833
>>>/qresearch/22882807
Peter Dutton’s father Bruce rushed to hospital after heart attack hours before first debate
Peter Dutton’s father was rushed to hospital in Queensland after suffering a heart attack shortly before the first debate of the election campaign.
Hannah Moore and Jessica Wang - April 9, 2025
Peter Dutton has choked up talking about his “tough bugger” dad Bruce after the 80-year-old suffered a heart attack just before the leaders’ debate on Tuesday night.
The Opposition Leader’s father Bruce Dutton was rushed to hospital in Queensland after suffering a heart attack, reportedly just one hour before the debate began.
“He’s stoic. He’s a tough bugger. He’s worked hard all of his life, and he’s been an amazing dad,” an emotional Mr Dutton told reporters on the campaign trail in Sydney on Wednesday.
“Of course you think about him. But he’s … fine and he’s doing well.”
When asked if he return to Brisbane to visit his dad, he said he would monitor the situation.
“I’ve spoken to Dad this morning, and I’ve got amazing siblings and my sisters are with dad at the moment so I will monitor that.”
Mr Dutton revealed he considered pulling out of the first debate of the election campaign after learning of his 80-year-old dad’s medical incident.
He was in a stable condition as of 9pm on Tuesday.
Mr Dutton was informed of the incident just minutes before the debate was set to kick off.
When asked how his father was faring during an appearance on Nova’s Fitzy, Wippa and Kate Ritchie show in Sydney, Mr Dutton said his dad’s health was good.
“He is a great man, and he’ll be fine,” he said.
“Look, I thought, ‘Do I pull out of the debate?’, but my sisters were up there with him and giving me regular reports, which was good.
“He’s a great man, and I love him very much.”
The first leaders debate began at 7.30pm on Tuesday, where there was no mention of the health incident by host Keiran Gillbert, Mr Dutton or Mr Albanese.
In a video posted to social media, Mr Dutton said he was ready for the debate.
“This is a really important debate, and a really important election for our country,” he said from the green room of the debate site.
“There is a lot of economic uncertainty and a lot of families who have been really hurt under this government.”
Earlier this year, Mr Dutton spoke of his admiration for his father, telling the Sydney Morning Herald that “my dad and I started literally with nothing”.
“[Bruce] worked seven days a week and he has done since he left school at a very young age, and he and I worked very closely together, went into business together when he and mum separated in 1987. That’s what happened,” he said.
Mr Dutton’s colleagues have rallied in support since news of the health incident broke, with Liberal Senator Jane Hume describing it as “incredibly sad”.
“I’m sure that there will be updates throughout the day but I think you can rest assured that the fact that Peter fronted up to the debate after hearing that news (and) performed exceptionally well, is demonstrative of just how dedicated he is to the job that he has, and the kind of prime minister that he will be,” Ms Hume said on Sunrise on Wednesday morning.
Nationals colleague Matt Canavan, speaking to Sky News, shared his well wishes to Mr Dutton’s family.
“My thoughts and prayers go to the Dutton family tonight,” he said.
“I just hope they get through this and Peter’s father recovers.”
Speaking about his father’s relationship with his children, Mr Dutton said Bruce is really “really proud” his 20-year-old son Harry commenced an carpentry apprenticeship.
“I think my dad is really proud of that because none of us went on to a construction career, and I think dad sort of takes a lot of pride in the discussions you can have with Harry,” he said.
“My siblings and I always joke about dad going into a restaurant or into a building somewhere, and he’s checking out the corners and checking out whether this, this is plum, or that’s straight, and now Harry (has) started to do the same which has been a bit comical.”
https://www.news.com.au/national/federal-election/peter-duttons-father-bruce-rushed-to-hospital-in-medical-emergency/news-story/670fe8a9b38ae9e4e4510c19c719feef
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50871
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22887588 (090955ZAPR25) Notable: Election 2025: Anthony Albanese and Peter Dutton battle for ascendancy over Donald Trump on tariffs - Peter Dutton has pledged to “stand up against bullies” when questioned by voters on how he would deal with Donald Trump and opened the door to extend his fuel excise cut, as Anthony Albanese tried to paint the Liberals’ nuclear power plan as an excuse to secretly cut education and health. In the first leaders’ debate of the May 3 election campaign, the Opposition Leader ramped up attacks on the Prime Minister’s management of the cost-of-living crisis and directly challenged Mr Albanese for overseeing the “highest-spending government since (Gough) Whitlam”, a claim rejected by the Labor leader. After a rocky start to his bid to oust a first-term Labor government, the Opposition Leader appeared to steady his campaign with a more confident performance while Mr Albanese said voters should not trust the Coalition. Mr Dutton took part in the debate despite his father suffering a heart attack and going to hospital just hours before the event started. The 100 undecided voters at the Sky News/Daily Telegraph people’s forum gave Mr Albanese a slight edge with 44 saying the Labor leader won the debate, 35 gave the victory to Mr Dutton and 21 left the debate still unsure.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50833
>>>/qresearch/22882807
Election 2025: Anthony Albanese and Peter Dutton battle for ascendancy over Donald Trump on tariffs
GEOFF CHAMBERS and SARAH ISON - 9 April 2025
1/2
Peter Dutton has pledged to “stand up against bullies” when questioned by voters on how he would deal with Donald Trump and opened the door to extend his fuel excise cut, as Anthony Albanese tried to paint the Liberals’ nuclear power plan as an excuse to secretly cut education and health.
In the first leaders’ debate of the May 3 election campaign, the Opposition Leader ramped up attacks on the Prime Minister’s management of the cost-of-living crisis and directly challenged Mr Albanese for overseeing the “highest-spending government since (Gough) Whitlam”, a claim rejected by the Labor leader.
After a rocky start to his bid to oust a first-term Labor government, the Opposition Leader appeared to steady his campaign with a more confident performance while Mr Albanese said voters should not trust the Coalition.
Mr Dutton took part in the debate despite his father suffering a heart attack and going to hospital just hours before the event started.
The 100 undecided voters at the Sky News/Daily Telegraph people’s forum gave Mr Albanese a slight edge with 44 saying the Labor leader won the debate, 35 gave the victory to Mr Dutton and 21 left the debate still unsure.
Mr Dutton attempted to use Mr Albanese’s election slogan that people under his government would only need their Medicare card to access healthcare, when he turned to an audience member and asked if she needed both a Medicare card and a credit card when visiting the GP.
Mr Dutton said for the first time he would consider extending his fuel excise cut in the next 12 months, while Mr Albanese rejected the cut as “out of the Scott Morrison playbook.”
“If we needed to extend it, then we could do that,” Mr Dutton said. “But I would just say that if you bake it in, and you put it as a continuing cost, that continues to compound … So, we just have to get the balance right.”
The Opposition Leader ramped up attacks on the Prime Minister’s management of cost of living and directly challenged Mr Albanese for overseeing the “highest-spending government since (Gough) Whitlam”, a claim rejected by the Labor leader.
Asked by Mr Albanese what he would cut to fund a nuclear plan “that will cost $600bn to provide 4 per cent of power sometime in the 2040s”, Mr Dutton hit back at his opponent over his broken promise to reduce power bills by $275 from 2025.
Amid stock market crashes and fears over global trade wars and a recession, Mr Albanese said Mr Trump’s tariffs were an “act of economic self-harm”.
“It’s expected to dampen global economic growth, so it does present a challenge, but last Thursday, we were prepared,” Mr Albanese said. “Australia got the best deal of any country on the planet, 10 per cent (tariffs) … no one got a better deal than us, in part because of the representations that we’ve made.”
Mr Dutton, who attacked Mr Albanese over Labor’s “big Australia” policy that has seen more than one million people come into the country in two years, said he had the experience to negotiate with the White House and cited how the Coalition previously landed tariff exemptions from Mr Trump.
“One of the great things about living in the greatest country in the world is that whatever is thrown at us, the prime minister of the day should have the ability and the strength of character to be able to stand up against bullies, against those that would seek to do us harm, to keep our country safe and to make sure that we can make the right economic decisions for our country as well,” Mr Dutton said. “And that’s exactly what I would seek to do as prime minister.”
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50872
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22887605 (091003ZAPR25) Notable: Dutton reveals details of campaign pledge to cut power prices - Opposition Leader Peter Dutton will promise Australians a 3 per cent cut in household energy bills and a 15 per cent reduction in gas prices for big industrial users if he wins government, pledging to flood the Australian market with gas to make energy cheaper and grow the economy. The Coalition has released long-awaited modelling on its national gas plan that forces companies to keep Australian gas onshore, revealed in Dutton’s budget-in-reply speech last month. After Dutton spent much of this term attacking Prime Minister Anthony Albanese for failing to bring down power bills by $275 as promised, the opposition has launched its most significant cost-of-living pitch of the campaign by committing to lower electricity prices. The pledge could come back to bite Dutton if prices continue to rise, but he will rely on analysis from Frontier Economics to argue his plan will lead to a 23 per cent cut in wholesale gas prices. That would lead to a 3 per cent cut in residential electricity prices, according to the modelling, an 8 per cent reduction in wholesale electricity prices, a 7 per cent deduction for household gas prices, and a 15 per cent cut for big industrial gas users such as smelters. A 3 per cent cut to electricity bills would equate to roughly $60 off the average east coast electricity bill of $2100, which applies to a homeowner without solar panels or batteries.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50833
>>>/qresearch/22882807
Dutton reveals details of campaign pledge to cut power prices
Paul Sakkal and Mike Foley - April 8, 2025
1/2
Opposition Leader Peter Dutton will promise Australians a 3 per cent cut in household energy bills and a 15 per cent reduction in gas prices for big industrial users if he wins government, pledging to flood the Australian market with gas to make energy cheaper and grow the economy.
The Coalition has released long-awaited modelling on its national gas plan that forces companies to keep Australian gas onshore, revealed in Dutton’s budget-in-reply speech last month.
After Dutton spent much of this term attacking Prime Minister Anthony Albanese for failing to bring down power bills by $275 as promised, the opposition has launched its most significant cost-of-living pitch of the campaign by committing to lower electricity prices.
The pledge could come back to bite Dutton if prices continue to rise, but he will rely on analysis from Frontier Economics to argue his plan will lead to a 23 per cent cut in wholesale gas prices.
That would lead to a 3 per cent cut in residential electricity prices, according to the modelling, an 8 per cent reduction in wholesale electricity prices, a 7 per cent deduction for household gas prices, and a 15 per cent cut for big industrial gas users such as smelters.
A 3 per cent cut to electricity bills would equate to roughly $60 off the average east coast electricity bill of $2100, which applies to a homeowner without solar panels or batteries.
The Coalition has not committed to a timeframe for the pledge because it said it would take time for the reservation scheme to kick in, but the modelling has a timeframe of about two years for the price reduction of 3 per cent to have an effect.
Labor and some experts have criticised Dutton’s gas reservation policy and claimed it lacked detail, but Dutton says that the move to keep gas for local use, which is backed by some left-wing think tanks and unions, was overdue.
“Our policy will be a game changer because we can then see the cost and therefore price of electricity, construction, food prices and many other goods start to come down,” Dutton said in a statement.
“Gas is critical to our nation’s energy future. By making the gas companies put more of our Aussie gas into our market instead of exporting it, we will get the price of gas down by 15 per cent.”
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50873
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22887620 (091026ZAPR25) Notable: Dutton to cut migrant numbers by 100,000 people each year - Opposition Leader Peter Dutton has committed to cutting new migrant numbers by 100,000 people each year, reinstating an ambitious target the Coalition had walked away from and prompting industry warnings that it could jeopardise the workforce needed to build homes. Dutton said the Coalition would impose the cuts “straight away, once we get into government” based on whatever the budget forecasts were, as he aimed to bring down population growth to free up housing for Australians. But the significant reduction risks backlash from businesses, industry groups and farmers who rely on migrant labour. The opposition leader has also been forced to defend his support for immigration after facing an audience question at the first leaders’ debate about “demonising migrants” in political debate. “I’ve said repeatedly that we are a great beneficiary of the migration program in our country,” Dutton said on Wednesday. He said migrant families were just as concerned about the housing market. Australia’s peak body for builders, however, warned blunt cuts to migration could jeopardise efforts to build housing stock as 25 per cent of the industry is made up of overseas workers.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50833
>>>/qresearch/22882807
Dutton to cut migrant numbers by 100,000 people each year
Natassia Chrysanthos - April 9, 2025
1/2
Opposition Leader Peter Dutton has committed to cutting new migrant numbers by 100,000 people each year, reinstating an ambitious target the Coalition had walked away from and prompting industry warnings that it could jeopardise the workforce needed to build homes.
Dutton said the Coalition would impose the cuts “straight away, once we get into government” based on whatever the budget forecasts were, as he aimed to bring down population growth to free up housing for Australians.
But the significant reduction risks backlash from businesses, industry groups and farmers who rely on migrant labour. The opposition leader has also been forced to defend his support for immigration after facing an audience question at the first leaders’ debate about “demonising migrants” in political debate.
“I’ve said repeatedly that we are a great beneficiary of the migration program in our country,” Dutton said on Wednesday. He said migrant families were just as concerned about the housing market.
Australia’s peak body for builders, however, warned blunt cuts to migration could jeopardise efforts to build housing stock as 25 per cent of the industry is made up of overseas workers.
“Labour shortages are currently the biggest handbrake on new home building and infrastructure projects. If we’re to have any hope of building 1.2 million homes, we need to get skilled tradies into the country quickly,” said Denita Wawn, the chief executive of Master Builders Australia.
“Any changes to migration levels must not undermine our ability to secure the tradie workforce needed to build the homes Australians are crying out for.”
Based on Labor’s budget forecast that there will be a net increase of 260,000 migrants next financial year, the Coalition’s target would be 160,000 net arrivals – the same figure the opposition dumped in December in favour of a more “realistic” number.
Dutton made the commitment under questioning from this masthead during a press conference in the western Sydney seat of McMahon on Wednesday. The opposition had not outlined a target for net migration since abandoning the 160,000 target that Dutton had revealed after the 2024 budget.
Industry groups – including the Business Council of Australia, Australian Chamber of Commerce and the Australian Industry Group – sounded the alarm about the Coalition’s target last year based on concern it would damage the economy and restrict the flow of skilled foreign workers when industries, including construction and tourism, are short of staff.
Bran Black, chief executive of the Business Council of Australia, repeated that warning on Wednesday. “These proposals could negatively impact our economy, compound our existing skills shortages and make it harder to invest in new projects and grow businesses,” he said.
“Australia’s migration program should be geared towards helping address our growing skills shortages and backing in our international education sector as the country’s fourth-largest export.”
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50874
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22892353 (101052ZAPR25) Notable: Election 2025: Steve Bracks backs Jacinta Allan, Anthony Albanese unlikely to appear again with Victorian Premier - Steve Bracks has backed Jacinta Allan in a rare public intervention into Labor leadership tension as the under-fire Premier’s hold on the top job comes under new pressure. The former premier, who led Labor to three successive Victorian election victories, threw his considerable influence as a party elder behind the current leader as she battled plunging public support for Labor. In a statement released on Thursday, Mr Bracks rejected media speculation his support for Ms Allan - whose career he has backed since 1999 – was slipping and he was growing open to a leadership switch. “I firmly support the leadership of Jacinta Allan and believe she is best able to win an historic fourth term for Labor,” he said in a statement released on Thursday. “Media reporting to the contrary is false.” With renewed speculation the Premier could be forced out by anxious colleagues if federal Labor suffers major setbacks in Victoria on May 3, The Australian has confirmed there are no firm plans or even loose commitments for the Prime Minister to appear alongside her again. The “one time only” Albanese-Allan joint appearance on Monday was designed to neutralise the issue of the PM’s failure to appear with the Victorian Premier and while Labor figures have not absolutely ruled out a repeat, they say it’s highly unlikely. The “anti-Allan” strategy is in stark contrast to plans for the PM to keep standing alongside Labor’s popular premiers; WA’s Roger Cook, SA’s Peter Malinauskas and NSW’s Chris Minns between now and election day.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50833
>>50744
>>50864
Election 2025: Steve Bracks backs Jacinta Allan, Anthony Albanese unlikely to appear again with Victorian Premier
DAMON JOHNSTON and LILY MCCAFFREY - 10 April 2025
1/2
Steve Bracks has backed Jacinta Allan in a rare public intervention into Labor leadership tension as the under-fire Premier’s hold on the top job comes under new pressure.
The former premier, who led Labor to three successive Victorian election victories, threw his considerable influence as a party elder behind the current leader as she battled plunging public support for Labor.
In a statement released on Thursday, Mr Bracks rejected media speculation his support for Ms Allan – whose career he has backed since 1999 – was slipping and he was growing open to a leadership switch.
“I firmly support the leadership of Jacinta Allan and believe she is best able to win an historic fourth term for Labor,” he said in a statement released on Thursday. “Media reporting to the contrary is false.”
Mr Bracks led Labor to election victories in 1999, 2002 and 2006 and since his retirement 18 years ago has avoided commenting publicly on internal Labor affairs. While Thursday’s statement was designed to dampen down leadership speculation it has underlined the serious internal threat Ms Allan is facing.
Mr Bracks’ statement came as it emerged that Anthony Albanese was highly unlikely to stage another double-act with Ms Allan over the remaining 23 days of the election campaign amid ongoing concerns the crisis-stricken Premier will cost Labor votes.
With renewed speculation the Premier could be forced out by anxious colleagues if federal Labor suffers major setbacks in Victoria on May 3, The Australian has confirmed there are no firm plans or even loose commitments for the Prime Minister to appear alongside her again.
The “one time only” Albanese-Allan joint appearance on Monday was designed to neutralise the issue of the PM’s failure to appear with the Victorian Premier and while Labor figures have not absolutely ruled out a repeat, they say it’s highly unlikely.
The “anti-Allan” strategy is in stark contrast to plans for the PM to keep standing alongside Labor’s popular premiers; WA’s Roger Cook, SA’s Peter Malinauskas and NSW’s Chris Minns between now and election day.
Ms Allan was forced to again defend her leadership after fresh speculation Labor MPs would move to oust her if the ALP loses more than three seats at the election, insisting she has the support of her Victorian Labor colleagues.
To avoid complicated party rules aimed at protecting leaders from challenges, Labor rivals would need to convince Ms Allan she had lost the backing of the overwhelming number of MPs to convince her to resign just 18 months before the next state election.
Ms Allan said she was confident she had support from all factions across her party. “That’s because I know from working with colleagues, from talking with colleagues that we’re all focused on the same thing, not this commentary, we are all focused … on working with our communities,” she said.
“I know I have the support of my colleagues, because (I’m) talking and working with them every single day.”
Asked about the polling and whether she accepted her brand was unpopular with Victorians, Ms Allan said she would “leave commentary to others”.
“What I am focused on every single day is … on delivering what working people and families need from a Labor government,” she said.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50875
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22892385 (101106ZAPR25) Notable: Election 2025: Shock polling has Energy Minister Chris Bowen at risk in McMahon - Climate Change and Energy Minister Chris Bowen is in danger of losing his western Sydney seat of McMahon to local tech millionaire Matt Camenzuli, according to independent polling showing power bills a top concern. Mr Bowen holds the seat, which has always been in ALP hands, with a margin of about 10 per cent after an electoral redistribution, but Compass polling taken last weekend shows him on just 19 per cent support, well behind independent candidate Mr Camenzuli on 41 per cent. Not only does the polling show Mr Bowen behind the local businessman, but also just below the Liberal support of 20 per cent. The distribution of Liberal preferences could decide the outcome on election night. Voters in McMahon overwhelmingly rejected the same-sex marriage plebiscite Labor supported in 2017, as well as the Indigenous voice to parliament. Labor support in western Sydney is under pressure, with seats being directly targeted by the Coalition. But Labor was dismissive of the poll on Wednesday, claiming it did not represent the electorate and that Mr Camenzuli would finish below the Liberals.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50833
Election 2025: Shock polling has Energy Minister Chris Bowen at risk in McMahon
DENNIS SHANAHAN - 10 April 2025
Climate Change and Energy Minister Chris Bowen is in danger of losing his western Sydney seat of McMahon to local tech millionaire Matt Camenzuli, according to independent polling showing power bills a top concern.
Mr Bowen holds the seat, which has always been in ALP hands, with a margin of about 10 per cent after an electoral redistribution, but Compass polling taken last weekend shows him on just 19 per cent support, well behind independent candidate Mr Camenzuli on 41 per cent.
Not only does the polling show Mr Bowen behind the local businessman, but also just below the Liberal support of 20 per cent.
The distribution of Liberal preferences could decide the outcome on election night.
Voters in McMahon overwhelmingly rejected the same-sex marriage plebiscite Labor supported in 2017, as well as the Indigenous voice to parliament.
Labor support in western Sydney is under pressure, with seats being directly targeted by the Coalition.
But Labor was dismissive of the poll on Wednesday, claiming it did not represent the electorate and that Mr Camenzuli would finish below the Liberals.
Peter Dutton was campaigning in Mr Bowen’s electorate on Wednesday with the new Liberal candidate, Carmen Lazar, who works in immigration and is a former Labor Party councillor. The cost of living was dominating discussions with voters.
Mr Bowen told The Australian that given the independent, Mr Camenzuli, was a former a Liberal Party member and that the Liberal candidate was a former Labor member: “I’m the only one with consistency.”
The survey, a MMS/SMS poll with 1003 respondents by independent polling company Compass, also found that grocery costs were the biggest concern in the western Sydney suburbs, at 85 per cent followed by energy at 72 per cent.
Health (61 per cent), fuel (54 per cent) and housing (50 per cent) were the next highest priorities according to the poll.
Climate concerns rated at only 26 per cent and “LBGTQ” issues were the lowest nominated concern in the poll.
When the Opposition Leader was asked whether his policy of cutting immigration was a drag on Liberal support in western Sydney he said Ms Lazar’s family was an example of how migrant families added to Australia.
“I’ve said repeatedly that we are a great beneficiary of the migration program in our country,” he said.
“Look at Carmen’s family story, look at many other candidates that we have running at this election, people who have worked hard. The migrant story, particularly, I think we’ve pointed out on many occasions, of people who have come here since the Second World War period, people who have started with nothing, amassed a fortune, or people who have come here as builders and bricklayers and tilers and the rest of it.
“We are a net beneficiary of that, but I think the concentration, at the moment, is on ‘how can our migration program work best for us?’”.
Mr Camenzuli, a former Liberal NSW state executive who unsuccessfully sued former prime minister Scott Morrison over factional preselection processes at the last election, has been campaigning in McMahon since the beginning of the year.
As a local businessman and IT millionaire, Mr Camenzuli is running on a platform highlighting the cost of living and the proposed cut to the fuel excise.
“I spend a lot of time in the electorate and you see people putting food back from their trolleys, and buying smaller bags of food because there’s just not enough money to feed the kids,” he said at his campaign launch.
https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/election-2025-shock-polling-has-energy-minister-chris-bowen-at-risk-in-mcmahon/news-story/3b7f3e0b1c03fe5db90809f339d1bcbd
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50876
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22900890 (120456ZAPR25) Notable: Video: Peter Dutton alleged target of Brisbane private school student’s terror plot - Peter Dutton was allegedly the target of a Brisbane private school student charged with buying ingredients to make bombs and testing “homemade explosives” in preparation to launch a terrorist attack. The 16-year-old, who cannot be named for legal reasons, was arrested and charged last August after a joint counter-terrorism investigation by federal and Queensland police. Sources have told The Australian that the teenager was allegedly planning to attack the federal Opposition Leader at his home on an acreage, north of Brisbane. The alleged plot, according to the sources familiar with the investigation, involved the use of a drone. Queensland and federal police declined to comment about their investigation or the evidence against the teenager, who on Thursday was committed to stand trial on a single charge relating to the alleged plot. The teenager, who attended one of Brisbane’s prestigious private boys’ schools until his arrest, has been charged with a commonwealth offence of committing acts done “in preparation for, or planning, a terrorist act”. It carries a maximum penalty of life imprisonment if convicted.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50833
Peter Dutton alleged target of Brisbane private school student’s terror plot
MICHAEL MCKENNA and LYDIA LYNCH - April 10, 2025
1/2
Peter Dutton was allegedly the target of a Brisbane private school student charged with buying ingredients to make bombs and testing “homemade explosives” in preparation to launch a terrorist attack.
The 16-year-old, who cannot be named for legal reasons, was arrested and charged last August after a joint counter-terrorism investigation by federal and Queensland police.
Sources have told The Australian that the teenager was allegedly planning to attack the federal Opposition Leader at his home on an acreage, north of Brisbane.
The alleged plot, according to the sources familiar with the investigation, involved the use of a drone.
Queensland and federal police declined to comment about their investigation or the evidence against the teenager, who on Thursday was committed to stand trial on a single charge relating to the alleged plot.
The teenager, who attended one of Brisbane’s prestigious private boys’ schools until his arrest, has been charged with a commonwealth offence of committing acts done “in preparation for, or planning, a terrorist act”.
It carries a maximum penalty of life imprisonment if convicted.
The charge alleges the teenager researched “bomb-making instructions, purchased explosives ingredients, tested thermal chemical reactions, tested homemade explosives” contrary to section 101.6 of the Commonwealth Criminal Code. It is alleged the teenager, who has been held in custody since his arrest, planned the attack over two months, from May 21 to July 15 last year.
At a brief hearing in Brisbane’s Children’s Court on Thursday, the teenager was committed to stand trial in the Supreme Court of Queensland on the charge. No details were given during the hearing, nor in court documents, as to a target of the alleged plot.
A commonwealth prosecutor submitted a number of witness statements as part of the brief of evidence. His lawyer, Michael Cridland conceded his client had a prima-facie case to answer and consented to him being committed to stand trial before a jury at a later date.
In committing him to stand trial, magistrate Megan Power said: “Your lawyer has said there is enough evidence in the paperwork that has been provided to me to justify you going on trial in a higher court, the Supreme Court.”
When asked if he would like to say anything in answer to the charge or enter a plea, the teenager, who appeared by video link from a detention centre, responded: “No, I do not wish to enter any plea.”
Later asked by Ms Power if he had any questions about the proceedings, he responded: “No, thank you”.
His lawyers did not make an application for bail. Both his parents attended the hearing.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50877
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22900903 (120504ZAPR25) Notable: Albanese reaches out to Dutton over report of alleged terror plot - Anthony Albanese has reached out to Peter Dutton after reports he was the subject of an alleged terror plot, saying there is "no place whatsoever in politics" for such threats and alleging he was himself the subject of a threat. A report in The Australian suggested Mr Dutton was the target of a 16-year-old boy, who allegedly bought bomb-making ingredients in preparation for an attack. A teenager, who cannot be named under Queensland laws, appeared before the Brisbane Children's Court on Thursday charged with buying and testing bomb ingredients over a period from May to July of last year. He was committed to stand trial and is remanded in custody. No details were given during the hearing as to any target of the alleged plot. Mr Albanese said the number of threats against politicians was increasing, necessitating heightened security on the election campaign trail. "I've reached out to Peter Dutton this morning, and it is a fact that the number of threats that have been made to parliamentarians has increased in recent times," he said. The prime minister alleged he had also been the subject of "a pretty serious incident" which he said was "before legal processes at the moment". "[But] I have confidence in … the Australian Federal Police and the authorities to do what they can to keep us safe. But that is one of the reasons why you have seen an increased number of security measures put in place."
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50833
>>50876
Albanese reaches out to Dutton over report of alleged terror plot
Tom Crowley - 11 April 2025
1/2
Anthony Albanese has reached out to Peter Dutton after reports he was the subject of an alleged terror plot, saying there is "no place whatsoever in politics" for such threats and alleging he was himself the subject of a threat.
A report in The Australian suggested Mr Dutton was the target of a 16-year-old boy, who allegedly bought bomb-making ingredients in preparation for an attack.
A teenager, who cannot be named under Queensland laws, appeared before the Brisbane Children's Court on Thursday charged with buying and testing bomb ingredients over a period from May to July of last year. He was committed to stand trial and is remanded in custody. No details were given during the hearing as to any target of the alleged plot.
Mr Albanese said the number of threats against politicians was increasing, necessitating heightened security on the election campaign trail.
"I've reached out to Peter Dutton this morning, and it is a fact that the number of threats that have been made to parliamentarians has increased in recent times," he said.
The prime minister alleged he had also been the subject of "a pretty serious incident" which he said was "before legal processes at the moment".
"[But] I have confidence in … the Australian Federal Police and the authorities to do what they can to keep us safe. But that is one of the reasons why you have seen an increased number of security measures put in place."
Mr Dutton brushed aside a question about the matter at a West Australian newspaper forum in Perth, declining to discuss the alleged incident but making the general comment that politics is "a brutal business, there's no question about that".
Mr Dutton added he felt "an immense sense of pride being able to work in the job that I work in, and it takes a decision at some point in your life that you want to abandon your anonymity and you want to contribute to a country that you love very much".
Later on Friday, he told reporters he was "incredibly grateful" for the ongoing protection he received from the Australian Federal Police (AFP), at the same level as the PM and the Governor-General.
"I've never felt unsafe one day in this job, particularly with the protection from the AFP. It hasn't stopped me from doing anything ...
"Ultimately this job is a test of character: Do you have the strength of character regardless of what's thrown at you to deal with the issues and to act in our country's best interests."
The Coalition's campaign spokesperson James Paterson told the ABC's News Breakfast reports of the alleged threat were "distressing" both for Mr Dutton and his family.
"Peter Dutton has served our country in public life for 20 years, and for a decade before that as a police officer. Unfortunately, sometimes there is a price for that" he said.
"But if plots like this are aimed at intimidating Peter and his family, or the other threats he received are aimed at doing that, then they will fail, because Peter is a strong person."
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50878
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22900909 (120509ZAPR25) Notable: Albanese reveals legal proceedings over ‘serious incident’ - Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has revealed authorities have launched legal proceedings to protect him after a “serious incident”, as it emerged that a Brisbane teenager had allegedly plotted to harm Opposition Leader Peter Dutton in a terrorist attack. Albanese said he had reached out to Dutton to discuss the alleged terror plot, adding that “it is a fact that the number of threats that have been made to parliamentarians has increased in recent times and that has been reported on by the appropriate authorities”. “I myself have been the subject of a range of issues, at least one of which is before legal processes at the moment,” he told reporters in Darwin. “There was a pretty serious incident.” Albanese said he had confidence in the Australian Federal Police’s ability to keep parliamentarians safe, as he noted increased security protections for politicians during the federal election campaign. The early days of the campaign were marred by environmental protesters gatecrashing several events, including by posing as journalists, leading both campaigns to tighten their security arrangements. Asked to provide more detail at a subsequent press conference, Albanese said it “is not in the interest of security to give a whole range of details, which then can lead to people copying” the threats. Albanese confirmed there had been several threats made, and one “particularly serious incident”, as he suggested authorities had advised him not to elaborate on the details.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50833
>>50876
>>50877
Albanese reveals legal proceedings over ‘serious incident’
Matthew Knott - April 11, 2025
Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has revealed authorities have launched legal proceedings to protect him after a “serious incident”, as it emerged that a Brisbane teenager had allegedly plotted to harm Opposition Leader Peter Dutton in a terrorist attack.
Albanese said he had reached out to Dutton to discuss the alleged terror plot, adding that “it is a fact that the number of threats that have been made to parliamentarians has increased in recent times and that has been reported on by the appropriate authorities”.
“I myself have been the subject of a range of issues, at least one of which is before legal processes at the moment,” he told reporters in Darwin.
“There was a pretty serious incident.”
Albanese said he had confidence in the Australian Federal Police’s ability to keep parliamentarians safe, as he noted increased security protections for politicians during the federal election campaign.
The early days of the campaign were marred by environmental protesters gatecrashing several events, including by posing as journalists, leading both campaigns to tighten their security arrangements.
Asked to provide more detail at a subsequent press conference, Albanese said it “is not in the interest of security to give a whole range of details, which then can lead to people copying” the threats.
Albanese confirmed there had been several threats made, and one “particularly serious incident”, as he suggested authorities had advised him not to elaborate on the details.
“These matters are dealt with by the police and the courts when appropriate,” he said.
Dutton echoed Albanese’s remarks on police, saying he trusted the AFP to protect him and his family and hadn’t been advised to engage with fewer people or curtail his public engagement during the campaign.
“I’m incredibly grateful to the AFP that my family are kept safe,” he told reporters in Perth.
“I’ve never felt unsafe one day in this job, particularly with the protection from the AFP. It hasn’t stopped me from doing anything, and it won’t on this campaign.”
Australian Federal Police Commissioner Reece Kershaw last month said there had been 712 reports of threats against high office holders, federal parliamentarians, dignitaries and electorate offices this financial year.
At this rate, the number of threats will surpass the record number of threats received the previous year, he said.
Coalition campaign spokesman James Paterson said the alleged threat against Dutton was “very troubling”.
“It involves a minor, and it’s a matter before the court, so I have to be very cautious about what I say about this specific instance,” he said on Sky News television.
“What I can say more broadly about the issue of young people coming to the attention of counter-terrorism police and ASIO is that it’s unfortunately a disturbingly fast-growing trend ... They’re often being radicalised online, sometimes very quickly by consuming extreme content, and they can go from having no violent intent to having violent intent, sometimes very quickly.”
The accused teenager has been committed to stand trial but has not entered a plea.
https://www.smh.com.au/politics/federal/albanese-reveals-legal-proceedings-over-serious-incident-20250410-p5lqo3.html
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50879
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22905370 (130946ZAPR25) Notable: Election 2025: Liberals ‘anxious’ of losing key WA seat of Forrest - A blue-ribbon West Australian Liberal seat held by the Coalition for more than 50 years is at risk of being lost to the Climate 200 teal independent, forcing the party to funnel resources into maintaining the electorate when it hoped to be flipping seats in the state. While the teals had originally planned to only bring down the margin of Forrest - in WA’s South West region – before seeking to win the seat in the following election, polling commissioned by Simon Holmes a Court’s Climate 200 revealed a tight contest between independent Sue Chapman and Liberal candidate Ben Small. When asked who would receive their first preference if the election were held today, about 20 per cent of the almost 1000 constituents surveyed earlier this month said they would choose Ms Chapman, while 34 per cent chose Mr Small - a former WA Liberal senator. However, on a two-candidate preferred basis, the polling showed Ms Chapman ahead of Mr Small 51 per cent to 49 per cent. The polling, which the Coalition has previously criticised for the way it asks voters questions, also showed 27 per cent of undecided voters preferred Ms Chapman, compared to less than 18 per cent who indicated they were leaning towards Mr Small. While Forrest withstood Labor’s wipe-out of WA blue-ribbons seats including Pearce, Hasluck, Swan and Tangney in 2022, the electorate still recorded a swing to Labor of more than 10 per cent, leaving the once-safe seat in play for the 2025 election with a margin of just over 4 per cent.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50833
Election 2025: Liberals ‘anxious’ of losing key WA seat of Forrest
SARAH ISON and GEOFF CHAMBERS - April 11, 2025
A blue-ribbon West Australian Liberal seat held by the Coalition for more than 50 years is at risk of being lost to the Climate 200 teal independent, forcing the party to funnel resources into maintaining the electorate when it hoped to be flipping seats in the state.
While the teals had originally planned to only bring down the margin of Forrest – in WA’s South West region – before seeking to win the seat in the following election, polling commissioned by Simon Holmes a Court’s Climate 200 revealed a tight contest between independent Sue Chapman and Liberal candidate Ben Small.
When asked who would receive their first preference if the election were held today, about 20 per cent of the almost 1000 constituents surveyed earlier this month said they would choose Ms Chapman, while 34 per cent chose Mr Small – a former WA Liberal senator.
However, on a two-candidate preferred basis, the polling showed Ms Chapman ahead of Mr Small 51 per cent to 49 per cent.
The polling, which the Coalition has previously criticised for the way it asks voters questions, also showed 27 per cent of undecided voters preferred Ms Chapman, compared to less than 18 per cent who indicated they were leaning towards Mr Small.
While Forrest withstood Labor’s wipe-out of WA blue-ribbons seats including Pearce, Hasluck, Swan and Tangney in 2022, the electorate still recorded a swing to Labor of more than 10 per cent, leaving the once-safe seat in play for the 2025 election with a margin of just over 4 per cent.
Compounding the risk of the Liberals losing the electorate, former Forrest MP Nola Marino announced last year she would be retiring after having held the seat for more than 15 years.
Liberal MPs familiar with the electorate told The Australian the party was “anxious” about holding Forrest, a sentiment that was reflected by Peter Dutton deciding to visit the seat in the first week of his campaign and announce millions of dollars in funding to upgrade the local airport.
“It’s definitely a cause for concern,” one Liberal MP said.
“We’re not alarmed yet, but we’re anxious.”
Labor’s reticence to announce a candidate until recently had also increased the risk of the Coalition losing the seat to Ms Chapman.
“Labor running dead has not helped,” a Liberal MP said. “It really causes us trouble if they get third [on the ballot]. By doing nothing, they’ve forced us to focus on Forrest and spend money there, rather than where we’d like to, like Pearce or Tangney.”
Ms Chapman, who has been working as a surgeon in the South West for years, confirmed that Climate 200 had helped her run “a fantastic campaign”, which included a blitz of door knocking and meetings with constituents who she said had “never heard from their local member before”, given the seat had always been so safe for the Liberals.
“I wanted to show that we could do something differently, and that we could do it together as a community,” she said. “The growing local support behind the campaign is my motivation.”
Mr Holmes a Court’s Climate 200 is providing funding, polling and election support for 35 teal MPs and candidates, including Forrest, Curtin, Fremantle and Moore in WA. In addition to defending its incumbent seats, including Kate Chaney’s seat of Curtin in Perth, Climate 200 had stated its top targets were the Liberal-held seats of Bradfield and Wannon, and Nationals seats of Cowper and Calare.
The cashed-up political activist group has strategically backed candidates in Coalition seats where MPs are retiring or have defected to the crossbench, including in Forrest, McPherson, Lyne and Grey.
The Liberal Party, which is pouring resources into seats lost to the teals in 2022, is most hopeful of winning back Curtin, Goldstein and Kooyong. All three seats are expected to come down to the wire.
Ms Chapman said it was “gratifying” to see Mr Dutton make such an early stop in Forrest, but said people were ready for change in the face of challenges such as the lowest rate of rental affordability of all regional areas in WA.
https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/election-2025-liberals-anxious-of-losing-key-wa-seat-of-forrest/news-story/1753dc7a4a0298bb999d350d41eb1191
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50880
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22905376 (130954ZAPR25) Notable: Video: Jacinta Price pledges to ‘make Australia great again’ - Coalition frontbencher Jacinta Nampijinpa Price has vowed to “make Australia great again” while standing alongside Opposition Leader Peter Dutton at an event in Perth on Saturday, echoing US President Donald Trump’s signature slogan. The firebrand senator made the remarks at the end of her speech and before a press conference where she vowed to overhaul Australia’s education system and accused Prime Minister Anthony Albanese of having “effectively destroyed Australia”. “We have incredible candidates right around the country that I’m so proud to be able to stand beside to ensure that we can make Australia great again, that we can bring Australia back to its former glory, that we can get Australia back on track,” Price said. Labor has capitalised on voters’ fear of Trump’s tariffs policies and capricious approach to governing by attempting to link the Coalition to the president, which Dutton has parried by emphasising policy differences with the White House on issues such as the war in Ukraine. Asked about her remark at a press conference later on Saturday, Price said: “I don’t even realise I said that, but no, I’m an Australian and I want to ensure that we get Australia back on track.” Four days after Trump’s inauguration, Dutton appointed Price as the shadow minister for government efficiency, drawing parallels to the controversial Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) led by Trump ally and tech billionaire Elon Musk.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>>/qresearch/22431685 (pb)
>>50833
Jacinta Price pledges to ‘make Australia great again’
Natassia Chrysanthos and Matthew Knott - April 12, 2025
1/2
Coalition frontbencher Jacinta Nampijinpa Price has vowed to “make Australia great again” while standing alongside Opposition Leader Peter Dutton at an event in Perth on Saturday, echoing US President Donald Trump’s signature slogan.
The firebrand senator made the remarks at the end of her speech and before a press conference where she vowed to overhaul Australia’s education system and accused Prime Minister Anthony Albanese of having “effectively destroyed Australia”.
“We have incredible candidates right around the country that I’m so proud to be able to stand beside to ensure that we can make Australia great again, that we can bring Australia back to its former glory, that we can get Australia back on track,” Price said.
Labor has capitalised on voters’ fear of Trump’s tariffs policies and capricious approach to governing by attempting to link the Coalition to the president, which Dutton has parried by emphasising policy differences with the White House on issues such as the war in Ukraine.
Asked about her remark at a press conference later on Saturday, Price said: “I don’t even realise I said that, but no, I’m an Australian and I want to ensure that we get Australia back on track.”
Four days after Trump’s inauguration, Dutton appointed Price as the shadow minister for government efficiency, drawing parallels to the controversial Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) led by Trump ally and tech billionaire Elon Musk.
Price said her position was “not an ode to Donald Trump”, but was an extension of her longstanding interest in making sure spending on Indigenous affairs is efficient.
“We hate the fact that Anthony Albanese has effectively destroyed Australia,” Price said, adding that she wanted to “reset” the school curriculum to make it less ideological.
Dutton deflected repeated questions about Price’s “make Australia great again” comment before encouraging assembled journalists to ask Price more questions on an array of topics.
“Let’s just deal with the reality for people,” he said. “I really think that if we want to make their lives better, and we want to get our country back on track.”
Asked again, Dutton praised Price’s contribution to the Coalition and said he wanted to get rid of a bad government. “That’s what I want to do, and the biggest influence of my political life has been John Howard,” he said. “I’m incredibly proud of what Jacinta has done in saving our country from the Voice because that would have destroyed the social fabric of our country.”
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50881
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22905382 (131000ZAPR25) Notable: Image emerges of Jacinta Price wearing Maga cap - one day after she says Coalition will ‘make Australia great again’ - Coalition politicians have continued to downplay Jacinta Nampijinpa Price’s apparent referencing of Donald Trump’s signature Make America Great Again slogan at an election rally, calling it a “slip of the tongue” even as images emerge of the shadow minister and her husband wearing Maga hats just months ago. The Nationals leader, David Littleproud, called it a “slip of the tongue” when Price, the shadow minister for government efficiency and Indigenous Australians, told a campaign rally she wanted to “make Australia great again” on Saturday. The senator later claimed she hadn’t “even realised” she made the comments, then accused the media of being “obsessed” with the US president. Guardian Australia has obtained an image of the senator at an event with her family over the Christmas period wearing a Maga hat. In one image with her husband, Colin Lillie, she is seen holding a Trump Christmas tree decoration. Price is wearing a gold and white “Make America Great Again” baseball cap, while Lillie wears a Santa hat with the same slogan and a US flag. Guardian Australia has approached Coalition campaign headquarters for comment. Despite echoing several Trump policies, including naming Price to a “government efficiency” role reminiscent of Elon Musk’s “department of government efficiency”, Dutton has shrugged off comparisons to the US president. The Liberal leader has also denied that his plans to slash the public service, including cutting roles associated with the education department and those in diversity and inclusion positions, were influenced by Trump.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50880
Image emerges of Jacinta Price wearing Maga cap – one day after she says Coalition will ‘make Australia great again’
Exclusive: Guardian Australia obtains social media photo of Northern Territory senator in a ‘Make America Great Again’ hat – as Nationals leader David Littleproud insists her use of slogan was ‘slip of the tongue’
Sarah Basford Canales and Josh Butler - 13 Apr 2025
Coalition politicians have continued to downplay Jacinta Nampijinpa Price’s apparent referencing of Donald Trump’s signature Make America Great Again slogan at an election rally, calling it a “slip of the tongue” even as images emerge of the shadow minister and her husband wearing Maga hats just months ago.
The Nationals leader, David Littleproud, called it a “slip of the tongue” when Price, the shadow minister for government efficiency and Indigenous Australians, told a campaign rally she wanted to “make Australia great again” on Saturday. The senator later claimed she hadn’t “even realised” she made the comments, then accused the media of being “obsessed” with the US president.
Guardian Australia has obtained an image of the senator at an event with her family over the Christmas period wearing a Maga hat.
In one image with her husband, Colin Lillie, she is seen holding a Trump Christmas tree decoration. Price is wearing a gold and white “Make America Great Again” baseball cap, while Lillie wears a Santa hat with the same slogan and a US flag.
Guardian Australia has approached Coalition campaign headquarters for comment.
Despite echoing several Trump policies, including naming Price to a “government efficiency” role reminiscent of Elon Musk’s “department of government efficiency”, Dutton has shrugged off comparisons to the US president. The Liberal leader has also denied that his plans to slash the public service, including cutting roles associated with the education department and those in diversity and inclusion positions, were influenced by Trump.
Dutton has previously praised the US president as a “big thinker” and said he would have more in common with Trump than Anthony Albanese would; a position he has tried to walk back from as the effects of US tariffs on Australia turn local sentiment against Trump.
On Channel Nine’s Today show on Sunday, Littleproud – the leader of the Nationals party room, in which Price sits – downplayed her comments and claimed she was not seeking to reference Trump.
“This is an impromptu speech … You’ve got a whole lot of words going around your head, she inadvertently made these comments,” he said. “It’s nothing about trying to channel Trump at all.
“We all make slips during the campaign. This was an inadvertent one by Jacinta. And if that’s the level of debate that the Labor party want to bring to this, rather than policy about the fact that there are Australians tonight that won’t be able to afford dinner, all they’ve got to run on, on their record is smear and innuendo.”
“I think Australians want the adults in the room to run the show. Not one that’s just going to try and tear people down for slip of the tongues.”
The Coalition campaign spokesperson, James Paterson, distanced himself from the comments. On Sky News, the Liberal senator said “that’s not my style of politics” when asked if the Coalition would seek to ‘make Australia great again’ but he did not criticise the sentiment expressed by Price.
“I believe Australia is the greatest country in the world but we certainly don’t have the best government in the world, and we will not get back on track if the Albanese Labor government is re-elected,” Paterson said.
“What we need is a strong Coalition government led by Peter Dutton and David Littleproud that has the plans that we need to give the immediate relief that Australians need and the long-term plan to get cost of living under control.”
https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2025/apr/13/image-emerges-of-jacinta-price-wearing-maga-cap-one-day-after-she-says-coalition-will-make-australia-great-again
https://www.theage.com.au/national/happy-snap-jacinta-price-poses-in-a-maga-cap-for-family-christmas-selfie-20250413-p5lrd5.html
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50882
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22905392 (131009ZAPR25) Notable: Battle of the election ‘sugar hits’: Labor and Coalition announce tax plans at duelling campaign launches - Australians would get an automatic $1,000 tax deduction on their annual returns without having to produce receipts or paperwork, in an election promise made by Anthony Albanese at Labor’s campaign launch. The new, permanent tax deduction was announced by the Labor leader just an hour after Peter Dutton promised that a Coalition government would offer up to $1,200 in a one-off tax refund for low- and middle-income earners, as well as allow interest payments on home mortgages to be tax deductible for first home buyers. Labor and the Coalition are locked in an election spend-a-thon, with billions of new promises on cost-of-living measures and tax sweeteners – with each accusing the other of offering “sugar hit” policies to win votes. At Labor’s campaign launch in Perth, Albanese said the new “instant tax deduction” would allow all workers to claim $1,000 on work expenses against their tax liability - more than triple the existing benchmark of $300 without receipts. At the Coalition’s campaign launch, in western Sydney, Dutton pledged his own new tax relief for voters. The Liberal leader detailed what he called a cost-of-living tax offset, a $10bn tax cut to give low and middle income earners up to $1,200 in tax relief in the upcoming financial year. It closely mirrored the time-limited low and middle income tax offset from the previous Morrison Coalition government.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50833
Battle of the election ‘sugar hits’: Labor and Coalition announce tax plans at duelling campaign launches
Albanese unveils an automatic $1,000 deduction on annual tax returns while Dutton pledges $1,200 one-off tax refund for low- and middle income earners
Josh Butler and Sarah Basford Canales - 13 Apr 2025
1/2
Australians would get an automatic $1,000 tax deduction on their annual returns without having to produce receipts or paperwork, in an election promise made by Anthony Albanese at Labor’s campaign launch.
The new, permanent tax deduction was announced by the Labor leader just an hour after Peter Dutton promised that a Coalition government would offer up to $1,200 in a one-off tax refund for low- and middle-income earners, as well as allow interest payments on home mortgages to be tax deductible for first home buyers.
Both major parties held their campaign launches on Sunday – with Labor’s beginning minutes after the Coalition’s ended – and both using the event to unveil centrepiece housing promises. Labor and the Coalition are locked in an election spend-a-thon, with billions of new promises on cost-of-living measures and tax sweeteners – with each accusing the other of offering “sugar hit” policies to win votes.
At Labor’s campaign launch in Perth, Albanese said the new “instant tax deduction” would allow all workers to claim $1,000 on work expenses against their tax liability. It would more than triple the existing benchmark of $300 without receipts.
The prime minister said “millions” of people were missing out on deductions due to the complexity of the tax system, and therefore having to “pay more tax than they should”. People who have more than $1,000 in deductions can continue to claim their expenses as normal but Albanese said about 5.7 million people would be better off under the changes. He pledged nobody would be worse off.
“No paperwork, no box of receipts, no scrolling through your online banking – just tick the box and your return is ready,” Albanese told the 500-strong crowd at Perth’s convention centre.
“It takes away the hassle of tracking your expenses, especially if you work from home. And it gives you back more of your own money, faster.”
“Under Labor you earn more, keep more of what you earn – and get more back at tax time.”
Labor suggested the average amount of benefit would be $205; those earning between $45,000 and $135,000 could benefit by up to $320.
Labor had already shared details of its other announcement of the day , $10bn to build 100,000 new properties for first home buyers and expanding the first home guarantee program to all first home buyers, allowing them to obtain a mortgage with as little as a 5% deposit.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50883
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22909350 (141037ZAPR25) Notable: Newspoll: Voters expect Labor in minority government - A majority of voters now expect the May 3 election to deliver a hung parliament and a Labor minority government, as primary vote support for the Coalition falls to below levels recorded at the last election amid a boost in personal approval for Anthony Albanese. An exclusive Newspoll for The Australian shows expectations have swung significantly since the start of this year when a majority of voters expected the Coalition to win the election. Despite the increasing expectation of a hung parliament, two-thirds want a majority government, with 32 per cent wanting it to be led by Labor and 32 per cent wanting the Coalition. The latest Newspoll, the second of the campaign, shows the decline in primary vote support continuing for the Coalition, which has fallen a further point to 35 per cent. This follows a week dominated by market turmoil triggered by Donald Trump’s trade war, the ditching of the Coalition’s return to the office mandate for public servants and a closely contested leaders’ debate. This is the third consecutive poll to record a decline in the Coalition’s primary vote, which reached a high of 40 per cent in November last year and 39 per cent in January this year. It is now at its lowest ebb since October 2023, prior to the outcome of the voice referendum, but lower than was recorded at the last election where it achieved 35.7 per cent.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50833
>>50846
Newspoll: Voters expect Labor in minority government
SIMON BENSON - 13 April 2025
1/2
A majority of voters now expect the May 3 election to deliver a hung parliament and a Labor minority government, as primary vote support for the Coalition falls to below levels recorded at the last election amid a boost in personal approval for Anthony Albanese.
An exclusive Newspoll for The Australian shows expectations have swung significantly since the start of this year when a majority of voters expected the Coalition to win the election.
Despite the increasing expectation of a hung parliament, two-thirds want a majority government, with 32 per cent wanting it to be led by Labor and 32 per cent wanting the Coalition.
The latest Newspoll, the second of the campaign, shows the decline in primary vote support continuing for the Coalition, which has fallen a further point to 35 per cent.
This follows a week dominated by market turmoil triggered by Donald Trump’s trade war, the ditching of the Coalition’s return to the office mandate for public servants and a closely contested leaders’ debate.
This is the third consecutive poll to record a decline in the Coalition’s primary vote, which reached a high of 40 per cent in November last year and 39 per cent in January this year.
It is now at its lowest ebb since October 2023, prior to the outcome of the voice referendum, but lower than was recorded at the last election where it achieved 35.7 per cent.
This resulted in the lowest representation for the Coalition in the House of Representatives since the Liberal Party was formed.
However, Labor also continues to struggle with low primary vote support, which remains at 33 per for the third successive poll and consistent with the party’s last election result, the lowest for the ALP since the Great Depression.
The loss in support for the Coalition since the start of the campaign has coincided with a lift for Pauline Hanson’s One Nation. PHON’s primary vote rose a point to 8 per cent, which marks a two-point gain for the minor right-wing party since March and is the highest primary vote since April 2022.
It is three points higher than the 2022 election.
Support for the Greens remains unchanged at 12 per cent, consistent with the last election, with other minor parties and independents, including teal independents, also stable at 12 per cent. This is more than two points below the last election.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50884
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22909364 (141051ZAPR25) Notable: Trumpet of Patriots candidate Michael Jessop facing criminal charges - A man on bail for a number of serious offences, including stalking and weapons charges, will stand against Opposition Leader Peter Dutton this federal election. Michael Norman Jessop is a candidate for Clive Palmer's Trumpet of Patriots party, and will be listed on the ballot paper under Mr Dutton in the marginal Brisbane electorate of Dickson. Mr Jessop says he will fight what he describes as "trumped-up" charges. The boatbuilder, 70, from the Sunshine Coast ran unsuccessfully in last year's Queensland election as an independent candidate in the seat of Caloundra. Details of his alleged offending emerged just days before the state poll. Two of the charges, which relate to the possession of a knife and trespassing, remain before the Maroochydore Magistrates Court, where he is next due to appear in August. Other offences, including wilful damage, unlawful stalking and the unlawful possession of weapons, are before the District Court. Mr Jessop was arrested in July last year after police were called to reports of a man acting suspiciously outside a property in the Sunshine Coast town of Bli Bli, east of Nambour. Police allege they found weapons and camouflage clothing inside his car. It is also alleged that during a further search of the vehicle officers located a shovel, axe, gloves, duct tape, ropes and a cadaver bag.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50833
>>50779
Trumpet of Patriots candidate Michael Jessop facing criminal charges
abc.net.au - 14 April 2025
A man on bail for a number of serious offences, including stalking and weapons charges, will stand against Opposition Leader Peter Dutton this federal election.
Michael Norman Jessop is a candidate for Clive Palmer's Trumpet of Patriots party, and will be listed on the ballot paper under Mr Dutton in the marginal Brisbane electorate of Dickson.
Mr Jessop says he will fight what he describes as "trumped-up" charges.
The boatbuilder, 70, from the Sunshine Coast ran unsuccessfully in last year's Queensland election as an independent candidate in the seat of Caloundra.
Details of his alleged offending emerged just days before the state poll.
Two of the charges, which relate to the possession of a knife and trespassing, remain before the Maroochydore Magistrates Court, where he is next due to appear in August.
Other offences, including wilful damage, unlawful stalking and the unlawful possession of weapons, are before the District Court.
Police allegedly found shovel, cadaver bag
Mr Jessop was arrested in July last year after police were called to reports of a man acting suspiciously outside a property in the Sunshine Coast town of Bli Bli, east of Nambour.
Police allege they found weapons and camouflage clothing inside his car.
It is also alleged that during a further search of the vehicle officers located a shovel, axe, gloves, duct tape, ropes and a cadaver bag.
Mr Jessop did not answer questions about the charges he is facing, saying only he would fight them.
"I will stop at nothing short of a complete unconditional discharge," he told the ABC.
"I have got no criminal record of any kind whatsoever in my whole life. I am 70 years old, alright, I'm not about to start now."
Mr Jessop was banned from visiting the suburb of Bli Bli last year, and was required to report to police in Caloundra every Friday as part of his bail conditions.
Candidates running for the federal election are required to complete a mandatory checklist with the Australian Electoral Commission (AEC) to demonstrate their eligibility to be elected to parliament under section 44 of the Australian Constitution, but they are not legally required to disclose any criminal past.
If a candidate is accused of a crime but has not yet faced court or been convicted, they can still be elected to parliament.
It is up to the party to decide whether they should keep their membership until a court decides an outcome.
Running for 'basic freedom'
Mr Jessop told the ABC he was running in order to stand against Peter Dutton and for "basic freedom".
Clive Palmer's Trumpet of Patriots party has been contacted for comment.
The candidate profile for Mr Jessop described him as a "long-time local businessman" and as someone "deeply involved in the local community and sports".
"Mr Jessop’s candidacy represents a commitment to practical, experienced leadership," the profile read.
"He believes the Trumpet of Patriots offers a fresh, common-sense alternative to the major parties and is proud to stand for real solutions in the electorate of Dickson."
Mr Dutton's office has been contacted for comment.
Earlier this week, another Queensland-based Trumpet of Patriots candidate Gabrial Pennicott who is standing in Wide Bay, revealed he was bankrupt and jailed for fraud in 2011.
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-04-14/michael-jessop-bail-serious-charges-federal-election-candidate/105174716
https://trumpetofpatriots.org/candidates/michael-jessop/
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50885
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22914061 (151113ZAPR25) Notable: Trump backlash shifts voters from Dutton to Albanese: poll - Voters have lifted Labor to a powerful pre-election lead of 53.5 per cent in two-party terms amid signs that some have turned away from the Coalition out of concern at the impact of US President Donald Trump on Australia. The exclusive findings show that 35 per cent of undecided voters say they are less likely to back Opposition Leader Peter Dutton because of changes wrought by Trump, while only 24 per cent say the same of Prime Minister Anthony Albanese. The shift has cut support for the Coalition to just 46.5 per cent in two-party terms - down from 50 per cent less than one month ago – and suggests that Labor is within sight of holding majority government. Albanese has doubled his lead over Dutton as preferred prime minister, ahead by 46 to 30 per cent, after weeks of argument about competing tax policies and a sudden Coalition retreat last week on its plan to halt working from home in the public service. The survey, conducted by Resolve Strategic for this masthead, shows that Labor has increased its primary vote from 29 to 31 per cent in recent weeks, while the Coalition’s has fallen from 37 to 34 per cent. Core support for the Greens is steady at 13 per cent and Pauline Hanson’s One Nation has slipped one point to 6 per cent, while support for independent candidates has risen from 9 to 12 per cent. Albanese and Dutton have sought to distance themselves from Trump and his policies during the campaign, but Labor has accused the opposition leader of copying the US president with his complaints about “woke” agendas and his decisions to cut public servants.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>>/qresearch/22860237
>>50833
>>50883
Trump backlash shifts voters from Dutton to Albanese: poll
David Crowe - April 14, 2025
1/2
Voters have lifted Labor to a powerful pre-election lead of 53.5 per cent in two-party terms amid signs that some have turned away from the Coalition out of concern at the impact of US President Donald Trump on Australia.
The exclusive findings show that 35 per cent of undecided voters say they are less likely to back Opposition Leader Peter Dutton because of changes wrought by Trump, while only 24 per cent say the same of Prime Minister Anthony Albanese.
The shift has cut support for the Coalition to just 46.5 per cent in two-party terms – down from 50 per cent less than one month ago – and suggests that Labor is within sight of holding majority government.
Albanese has doubled his lead over Dutton as preferred prime minister, ahead by 46 to 30 per cent, after weeks of argument about competing tax policies and a sudden Coalition retreat last week on its plan to halt working from home in the public service.
The survey, conducted by Resolve Strategic for this masthead, shows that Labor has increased its primary vote from 29 to 31 per cent in recent weeks, while the Coalition’s has fallen from 37 to 34 per cent.
Core support for the Greens is steady at 13 per cent and Pauline Hanson’s One Nation has slipped one point to 6 per cent, while support for independent candidates has risen from 9 to 12 per cent.
Dutton stepped up his warnings about a hung parliament on Monday, saying Albanese was conducting a “charade” by claiming he could form majority government, but the new findings suggest a Labor majority is not impossible.
Resolve director Jim Reed said the latest results added to the shift towards Labor in the Resolve Political Monitor at the end of March, when the government rose from 48 to 51 per cent in two-party terms.
“Voters are reassessing Albanese and Dutton right now,” he said.
“Our last poll showed Labor making gains on policy areas consistent with the budget, but this time the gains are more about political performance.”
Albanese and Dutton have sought to distance themselves from Trump and his policies during the campaign, but Labor has accused the opposition leader of copying the US president with his complaints about “woke” agendas and his decisions to cut public servants.
The dispute over Trump flared again on Saturday when Coalition minister Jacinta Nampijinpa Price echoed the president’s rhetoric by declaring she wanted to “make Australia great again” while speaking alongside Dutton in Perth. She later said she had not realised she used the phrase.
The latest survey shows that 68 per cent of voters believe Trump’s victory at the US election has been a bad outcome for Australia – up from 60 per cent who said the same two weeks ago, before investors dumped stocks in response to his “liberation day” tariffs on April 2.
The Resolve Political Monitor asked voters whether their view of Trump made them more or less likely to vote for Anthony Albanese or Peter Dutton, posing the same question about each leader.
The survey finds that 22 per cent of voters say they are more likely to vote for Albanese, while 21 per cent are less likely to do so because of Trump.
It also finds that 14 per cent are more likely to vote for Dutton and 33 per cent are less likely to vote for him because of Trump.
“Trump equals uncertainty, and that’s really affecting Dutton’s campaign to convince people to take a risk on changing government,” said Reed.
The views are more pronounced among uncommitted voters, with 35 per cent saying they were less likely to vote for Dutton because of Trump, while 24 per cent say the same of Albanese.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50886
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22914075 (151120ZAPR25) Notable: Election 2025: Peter Dutton embraces underdog status amid sliding polls for Coalition - Peter Dutton has embraced the underdog tag and tried to distance himself from US President Donald Trump, as he spent day 18 of the campaign visiting three Labor-held outer Melbourne electorates in an indication he still sees a pathway for Coalition government through Victoria. After polls showing he was losing ground to Labor, the Opposition Leader said “We’re the underdog at this election”. Mr Dutton said it was an uphill battle to knock off a first-term government but there was “no question” the Coalition could win the election. He accused Anthony Albanese of running a “scare campaign” about the Coalition because he was “ashamed of his own record”. “A first-term government hasn’t lost since 1931 … but this has been the worst government since 1931; I don’t think Australians could afford three more years of this bad government,” he said. “So we have to make sure we work hard every day between now and the election.” With Labor making electoral inroads by claiming the Coalition was mimicking Mr Trump’s policies, Mr Dutton declined to stand by his earlier comment that the US President was a “big thinker and deal-maker”. Instead, he said the election was a “contest between Anthony Albanese and myself”.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50833
>>50883
>>50885
Election 2025: Peter Dutton embraces underdog status amid sliding polls for Coalition
GREG BROWN - 15 April 2025
Peter Dutton has embraced the underdog tag and tried to distance himself from US President Donald Trump, as he spent day 18 of the campaign visiting three Labor-held outer Melbourne electorates in an indication he still sees a pathway for Coalition government through Victoria.
After polls showing he was losing ground to Labor, the Opposition Leader said “We’re the underdog at this election”.
Mr Dutton said it was an uphill battle to knock off a first-term government but there was “no question” the Coalition could win the election.
He accused Anthony Albanese of running a “scare campaign” about the Coalition because he was “ashamed of his own record”.
“A first-term government hasn’t lost since 1931 … but this has been the worst government since 1931; I don’t think Australians could afford three more years of this bad government,” he said. “So we have to make sure we work hard every day between now and the election.”
With Labor making electoral inroads by claiming the Coalition was mimicking Mr Trump’s policies, Mr Dutton declined to stand by his earlier comment that the US President was a “big thinker and deal-maker”.
Instead, he said the election was a “contest between Anthony Albanese and myself”.
With the Liberals eyeing a swag of seats in Melbourne, Mr Dutton began his day at a housing development in the outer Melbourne seat of Hawke held by Labor MP Sam Rae on a margin of 7.6 per cent.
The Liberals say it is vulnerable amid a growing anti-Labor sentiment in Melbourne’s outer suburbs.
Mr Dutton used the visit to talk up his plans to offer tax breaks to first-home buyers who purchased new properties.
His son Harry, 20, was with him for the second day in a row.
While Harry on Monday said he was struggling to save up for a deposit, Mr Dutton on Tuesday confirmed he would provide financial assistance for his children to buy their first homes.
“Our household is no different to many households where we want our kids to work hard, to save and we’ll help them with the deposit at some stage,” Mr Dutton said. “But in many families, in a lot of families across the country, they haven’t got that luxury.”
After Hawke, Mr Dutton went to a petrol station in the seat of Gorton, where he spoke to locals about plans to cut the fuel excise.
The seat is held by Labor on a margin of nearly 10 per cent, although the retirement of long-serving member Brendan O’Connor gives the Liberals hope it could change hands.
Mr Dutton’s final stop was his third campaign visit to McEwen, held by Labor MP Rob Mitchell on a margin of 3.8 per cent.
He toured a construction company there and spoke to workers about his plans to bolster the industry. Mr Dutton drove a dump truck around the construction company’s yard before stopping at an on-site bowser to fill up the truck with petrol.
https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/election-2025-peter-dutton-embraces-underdog-status-amid-sliding-polls-for-coalition/news-story/a1d84c0be9488e4ca10146be96a6897d
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50887
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22924268 (171438ZAPR25) Notable: Video: Anthony Albanese and Peter Dutton grilled over US tariffs, China in tense election debate - Anthony Albanese and Peter Dutton have squared off in a tense debate held at the ABC’s Parramatta studio, discussing a wide range of topics from housing affordability to the country’s dilemma with foreign superpowers US and China. The Prime Minister and his opponent were grilled on the current pressures Australia is being put under following US President Trump’s ‘Liberation Day’ tariffs. Mr Dutton actually sided with Mr Albanese this month on the topic of pushing back against Mr Trump, promising that he would always fight for Australia’s interests no matter how daunting the task. “I said in relation to President Trump I thought the scenes we saw coming out of the White House, the treatment of President Zelenskyy, was a disgrace and appalling. I stand by those comments,” he said. “We trust the US, and I don’t know the President. I’ve not met him. My point is who I trust is the Australian people. My job is to stand up for our country’s interests which is what I did when we negotiated the AUKUS deal with President Biden.” Mr Albanese said he had “no reason not to” trust Mr Trump after their most recent chat. “In the end, he made a decision as part of the US administration to put these tariffs on every country. We got the lowest amount. But we made it very clear that was an act of self-harm by the US. The US enjoys a trade surplus with Australia. All this will do is put up costs for American consumers.”
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50833
>>>/qresearch/22860237
>>>/qresearch/22892329
Anthony Albanese and Peter Dutton grilled over US tariffs, China in tense election debate
Standing in front of millions of voters, the Prime Minister and his challenger have danced around the elephant in the room as global relations sit on a knife’s edge.
Alex Blair - April 16, 2025
1/2
Anthony Albanese and Peter Dutton have squared off in a tense debate held at the ABC’s Parramatta studio, discussing a wide range of topics from housing affordability to the country’s dilemma with foreign superpowers US and China.
The Prime Minister and his opponent were grilled on the current pressures Australia is being put under following US President Trump’s ‘Liberation Day’ tariffs.
Mr Dutton actually sided with Mr Albanese this month on the topic of pushing back against Mr Trump, promising that he would always fight for Australia’s interests no matter how daunting the task.
Debate moderator David Speers then pressed the two candidates on whether they “trusted” both Xi Jinping and Mr Trump. Mr Dutton admitted that while he found Donald Trump and JD Vance’s confrontation with Ukraine leader Volodymyr Zelensky “appalling”, he trusted the US as a country and simply hadn’t had the opportunity to get a gauge on Mr Trump one-on-one.
“I said in relation to President Trump I thought the scenes we saw coming out of the White House, the treatment of President Zelenskyy, was a disgrace and appalling. I stand by those comments,” he said.
“We trust the US, and I don’t know the President. I’ve not met him. My point is who I trust is the Australian people. My job is to stand up for our country’s interests which is what I did when we negotiated the AUKUS deal with President Biden.”
Mr Albanese said he had “no reason not to” trust Mr Trump after their most recent chat.
I’ve had a couple of discussions with him. And the last discussion we agreed on a series of words that he would give consideration. ‘Great consideration’ were the words he used.
“In the end, he made a decision as part of the US administration to put these tariffs on every country. We got the lowest amount. But we made it very clear that was an act of self-harm by the US. The US enjoys a trade surplus with Australia. All this will do is put up costs for American consumers.”
The candidates were then pressed on what they had planned to offer Mr Trump to scale back the tariffs. Mr Albanese dodged the question, claiming it was too sensitive of an issue to discuss on national television, but assured viewers he “won’t budge” on key issues including pharmaceuticals, the media bargaining code and biosecurity.
“We’ll engage diplomatically, not through TV interview, but we have put forward a proposition to the US. The US have put forward publicly their complaints about Australia,” he said.
“We won’t budge on the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme. We won’t budge on biosecurity issues. We won’t budge on the media bargaining code. We will stand up for Australia’s national interests because that is important.”
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50888
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22927363 (180513ZAPR25) Notable: Mark Dreyfus strikes vote-swapping deal with anti-Israel Greens in safe Labor seat - Labor’s most senior Jewish minister, Attorney-General Mark Dreyfus, will direct his supporters to give their second vote to an anti-Israel Greens candidate in his safe Victorian Labor seat of Isaacs. Mr Dreyfus, who sits on a comfortable 9.5 per cent margin, has instructed his supporters to preference the Greens candidate despite previously slamming the party for inciting potentially violent anti-Israel protests outside MPs’ offices and failing to condemn terror group Hamas. His how-to-vote cards will direct voters to put Greens challenger Matthew Kirwan as their No.2 pick, despite his backing for the Palestinian Advocacy Network, his attendance at an anti-Israel protest outside a senior ALP minister’s office, and his demands for sanctions on Israel. The how-to-vote card put up on Mr Dreyfus’s social media only states Mr Kirwan and the other candidates names and does not mention their parties. The Attorney-General’s vote-swapping pact with the Greens in Isaacs comes despite fellow Victorian MP Josh Burns - who is also Jewish – refusing to direct preferences in his inner Melbourne seat of Macnamara where there is a significant Jewish voter base.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>>/qresearch/22430407 (pb)
>>50708
>>50707
Mark Dreyfus strikes vote-swapping deal with anti-Israel Greens in safe Labor seat
THOMAS HENRY - 18 April 2025
Labor’s most senior Jewish minister, Attorney-General Mark Dreyfus, will direct his supporters to give their second vote to an anti-Israel Greens candidate in his safe Victorian Labor seat of Isaacs.
Mr Dreyfus, who sits on a comfortable 9.5 per cent margin, has instructed his supporters to preference the Greens candidate despite previously slamming the party for inciting potentially violent anti-Israel protests outside MPs’ offices and failing to condemn terror group Hamas.
His how-to-vote cards will direct voters to put Greens challenger Matthew Kirwan as their No.2 pick, despite his backing for the Palestinian Advocacy Network, his attendance at an anti-Israel protest outside a senior ALP minister’s office, and his demands for sanctions on Israel.
The how-to-vote card put up on Mr Dreyfus’s social media only states Mr Kirwan and the other candidates names and does not mention their parties.
Mr Dreyfus and the Victorian Labor Party were contacted for comment on the Isaacs preference deal.
The Attorney-General’s vote-swapping pact with the Greens in Isaacs comes despite fellow Victorian MP Josh Burns – who is also Jewish – refusing to direct preferences in his inner Melbourne seat of Macnamara where there is a significant Jewish voter base.
Mr Dreyfus led efforts to outlaw doxxing and Nazi symbols in Australia, and has repeatedly talked about the strain the domestic anti-Semitism crisis has had on him and other Jewish Australians.
He is also the most senior Labor MP to have visited Israel in the past year, where he visited the sites of the October 7 massacres and faced the fury of the Israeli government over Labor’s pro-Palestinian voting record in the United Nations.
Last June, Mr Dreyfus even faced down a legal threat from Greens leader Adam Bandt after he accused the anti-Israel party of backing in violent protests outside the offices of MPs.
“I think that the Greens political party, and particularly the leader of the Greens political party, have got something to answer for here in the way that they have been encouraging criminal damage of MPs electorate offices, encouraging really riotous behaviour, sometimes violent behaviour, that has been occurring outside electorate offices,” Mr Dreyfus told the ABC at the time.
And in September, Mr Dreyfus attacked the Greens for its repeated failures to condemn the actions of Gazan terror group Hamas since the October 7 massacres and its holding of hostages.
“We have yet to hear a proper condemnation of Hamas from Greens Party senators. It’s amazing that I should state that here in Australia in 2024,” he said in Sydney.
Mr Kirwan, who previously served as a Greens councillor for the City of Greater Dandenong, attended several pro-Palestine rallies last year, including a protest outside Clare O’Neil’s Oakleigh electoral office in Melbourne’s southeast.
“Many in Isaacs are personally affected by the Palestine situation or are people seeking asylum living in community detention. Only the Greens are serious about global justice issues and stand by the oppressed,” Mr Kirwan’s official website states.
The Greens candidate for Isaacs last week called for “targeted sanctions and an arms embargo on Israel”, an end to Israel’s “illegal occupation and apartheid” and “legal accountability for Israel’s war crimes” over his social media.
The post celebrated Mr Kirwan signing onto the Australian Palestine advocacy network’s candidate commitments, an organisation headed by radical anti-Israel activist Nasser Mashni.
https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/mark-dreyfus-strikes-voteswapping-deal-with-antiisrael-greens-in-safe-labor-seat/news-story/c7a559465b2ebf5f9714d89bb3a574cb
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50889
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22927387 (180525ZAPR25) Notable: Monique Ryan, Amelia Hamer face Gaza debate amid sharp rise in Jewish Kooyong numbers - Thousands of extra Jewish voters in the Victorian electorate of Kooyong have complicated teal MP Monique Ryan’s bid to retain the seat after the redistribution overhauled the boundaries. Demographic analysis suggests close to 5000 Jewish voters are now living within the new boundaries of Kooyong after the old seat of Higgins was abolished, an estimated increase of four times the numbers compared with the boundaries. The suburb of Toorak alone has about 1250 Jewish voters, which is slightly more than the total number of Jewish voters in Kooyong before 2025. The new Kooyong now includes well-heeled areas like Armadale, Toorak and Malvern, which are wealthy inner south-eastern Melbourne suburbs. The Liberal Party has tried to paint Dr Ryan as sympathetic to the Greens, which have attracted the ire of many Jewish community members over the minor party’s pro-Palestinian stance on Gaza. But Dr Ryan has told The Weekend Australian she won’t be doing any deals with the Greens if she is re-elected and that she wants to focus on alliances that counter anti-Semitism. It comes after the October 7 atrocities and the war in Gaza, although the broad Jewish vote is not confined to conservative politics, nor does it back as a bloc the decisions of the Netanyahu government.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50833
>>50822
>>50841
Monique Ryan, Amelia Hamer face Gaza debate amid sharp rise in Jewish Kooyong numbers
JOHN FERGUSON - 18 April 2025
1/2
Thousands of extra Jewish voters in the Victorian electorate of Kooyong have complicated teal MP Monique Ryan’s bid to retain the seat after the redistribution overhauled the boundaries.
Demographic analysis suggests close to 5000 Jewish voters are now living within the new boundaries of Kooyong after the old seat of Higgins was abolished, an estimated increase of four times the numbers compared with the boundaries.
The suburb of Toorak alone has about 1250 Jewish voters, which is slightly more than the total number of Jewish voters in Kooyong before 2025.
The new Kooyong now includes well-heeled areas like Armadale, Toorak and Malvern, which are wealthy inner south-eastern Melbourne suburbs.
The Liberal Party has tried to paint Dr Ryan as sympathetic to the Greens, which have attracted the ire of many Jewish community members over the minor party’s pro-Palestinian stance on Gaza.
But Dr Ryan has told The Weekend Australian she won’t be doing any deals with the Greens if she is re-elected and that she wants to focus on alliances that counter anti-Semitism.
The Kooyong demographic analysis is based on the most recent available data.
It gives a clear indication of the shifting demographics in Kooyong, which senior Liberals believe should notionally favour Liberal candidate Amelia Hamer.
It comes after the October 7 atrocities and the war in Gaza, although the broad Jewish vote is not confined to conservative politics, nor does it back as a bloc the decisions of the Netanyahu government.
Dr Ryan and Ms Hamer are due to conduct a Kooyong Jewish community candidates’ forum on Thursday.
A senior Liberal told The Weekend Australian that tens of thousands of new voters had been moved into Kooyong after the redistribution and the demolition of the old seat of Higgins.
The demographics were that it should advantage Ms Hamer.
“It’s a much better Liberal seat than it was last time around,’’ a senior Liberal said. “People are underestimating the numbers.’’
Kooyong is listed by the ABC’s Antony Green as 2.2 per cent independent versus the Liberal Party but a 3.7 per cent Liberal seat on a two party-preferred basis.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50890
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22927396 (180533ZAPR25) Notable: Jacinta Nampijinpa Price: Restore our nation’s greatness - what’s wrong with that? - "A few days ago, I said that I wanted to see Australia returned to its former glory. And what I meant by that was exactly what I said. That I want the damage to be reversed; that I want our country’s trajectory to begin to point true north again; that we might begin to see some semblance of restoration, redemption - dare I say it, greatness. The media pile-on that subsequently ensued is no secret to anyone. Now, I’ve received my fair share of criticism about my opinions before, so the relentless attacks weren’t all that upsetting. What really gets me, however, is that this is now the norm under Anthony Albanese. It’s one of the biggest indictments of his leadership and it must be called out. Make no mistake, the seeds of division and separatism sowed by Albanese when he committed to holding the voice referendum have had a vicious and lingering effect. We have been so divided, group against group, that it’s all we can see. It benefits no one. There are no winners - everyone suffers in a country like that. Because as the past week has shown, instead of focusing on the real issues, people are now so prone to the separatist mentality that we’re all too willing to distract ourselves with the pile-on without a second thought. The legacy of the Albanese government is the abolition of reasonable and rational conversations. Sensible ground on which mature adult conversations can be had has disappeared under Albanese’s leadership. If we oppose the voice, we’re racist; if we’re in favour of nuclear energy, we’re lunatics who’ll be guilty of creating three-eyed fish; if we witnessed the Prime Minister fall off a stage with our own eyes, we’re sorely mistaken. A Coalition government that I’m part of will govern Australia in the best interests of Australians. And the suggestion that we should be excluded from having the chance to govern because we aspire towards greatness is indefensible. So, to those in the valley of indecision, I dare you to go beyond the headline in weighing up who has the better vision and ability to lead our country. I dare you to believe that our future could be hope-filled, heading upwards, towards greatness and back on track." - Jacinta Nampijinpa Price, opposition spokeswoman for Indigenous Australians - theaustralian.com.au
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50833
>>50880
>>50881
Jacinta Nampijinpa Price: Restore our nation’s greatness – what’s wrong with that?
Jacinta Nampijinpa Price - April 17, 2025
1/2
The Coalition came into the 2025 federal election as the underdogs. Everyone knew that; we haven’t seen the defeat of a first-term government since 1931. That’s close to a century of history against us from the get-go.
And yet the Coalition has cemented ourselves firmly as a formidable and genuine threat to the Albanese government at this coming election. Whatever your political persuasion, that is objectively remarkable. And while there are many party faithful who are sure of who they will vote for, there are many who remain in the valley of indecision.
I suspect many of them, like most Australians, want to see Australia return to what they once knew it to be. Where we weren’t suffering through the worst downfall in living standards in our history; where we hadn’t been subjected to 12 interest rate hikes; where the cost of all basic necessities hadn’t gone up by a minimum of 10 per cent and average mortgage holders weren’t paying $50,000 extra.
I know without doubt that’s what I want.
A few days ago, I said that I wanted to see Australia returned to its former glory.
And what I meant by that was exactly what I said. That I want the damage to be reversed; that I want our country’s trajectory to begin to point true north again; that we might begin to see some semblance of restoration, redemption – dare I say it, greatness.
The media pile-on that subsequently ensued is no secret to anyone. Now, I’ve received my fair share of criticism about my opinions before, so the relentless attacks weren’t all that upsetting.
What really gets me, however, is that this is now the norm under Anthony Albanese. It’s one of the biggest indictments of his leadership and it must be called out.
Make no mistake, the seeds of division and separatism sowed by Albanese when he committed to holding the voice referendum have had a vicious and lingering effect. We have been so divided, group against group, that it’s all we can see.
It benefits no one. There are no winners – everyone suffers in a country like that. Because as the past week has shown, instead of focusing on the real issues, people are now so prone to the separatist mentality that we’re all too willing to distract ourselves with the pile-on without a second thought.
The legacy of the Albanese government is the abolition of reasonable and rational conversations. Sensible ground on which mature adult conversations can be had has disappeared under Albanese’s leadership.
If we oppose the voice, we’re racist; if we’re in favour of nuclear energy, we’re lunatics who’ll be guilty of creating three-eyed fish; if we witnessed the Prime Minister fall off a stage with our own eyes, we’re sorely mistaken.
That’s why, although the media asked me whether my comments were an endorsement of Trumpian policy, they didn’t want to know the answer. Because despite my unequivocal answer that the Coalition would govern Australia for Australians, those comments didn’t make the headlines because they didn’t fit the separatist narrative.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50891
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22931919 (191253ZAPR25) Notable: Video: Teal foreign workers posting election posters on power poles caught on video abusing voters - “F*ck off,” says the young man caught on camera. He and his buddy have European accents. They’re wheeling around corflutes for teal candidate Nicolette Boele and posting them to Ausgrid power poles, which is illegal, and the teals know it’s illegal. But they’re doing it anyway, these men. Tonight, for Boele in Sydney’s Bradfield. Days earlier it was for Allegra Spender in Wentworth. Ostensibly paid to break the law, these foreign workers are not Climate 200 volunteers. They’re not teal voters. They’re almost certainly non-citizens and in all likelihood they’re working for cash and couldn’t give a toss about the outcome of the May 3 election. Confronted by local residents, they become belligerent and physically aggressive. “What’s your problem?” one of them says to an elderly couple. These residents have been filming and asking questions, but the scene is turning ugly. An accomplice moves in and manhandles the mobile phone being used to film the interaction. In a different video, a Frenchman says: “Do you want to fight?” His pal laughs, shakes his head and says: “You are actually making our evening interesting.” Paying people to break the law is surely a new low for the teals, having comprehensively rammed it down everyone’s throats that they’re lifting the standard of politics. “People want to see politics done differently,” insisted Goldstein’s Zoe Daniel. “The public wants to see accountability and integrity,” said Zali Steggall. “You’ve told me you want more integrity in politics,” said Spender. But here we not only have payments being provided for a “criminal act”, as it’s defined by the NSW Electoral Commission, but the Spender and Boele campaigns wouldn’t even respond to our questions about the employment status of these hired hands, how they were being paid, and whether these men were instructed to flout the rules on posting corflutes to power poles.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50833
>>50822
Teal foreign workers posting election posters on power poles caught on video abusing voters
Yoni Bashan - April 18, 2025
“F*ck off,” says the young man caught on camera. He and his buddy have European accents. They’re wheeling around corflutes for teal candidate Nicolette Boele and posting them to Ausgrid power poles, which is illegal, and the teals know it’s illegal.
But they’re doing it anyway, these men.
Tonight, for Boele in Sydney’s Bradfield. Days earlier it was for Allegra Spender in Wentworth.
Ostensibly paid to break the law, these foreign workers are not Climate 200 volunteers. They’re not teal voters.
They’re almost certainly non-citizens and in all likelihood they’re working for cash and couldn’t give a toss about the outcome of the May 3 election.
Confronted by local residents, they become belligerent and physically aggressive.
“What’s your problem?” one of them says to an elderly couple.
These residents have been filming and asking questions, but the scene is turning ugly.
An accomplice moves in and manhandles the mobile phone being used to film the interaction.
In a different video, a Frenchman says: “Do you want to fight?” His pal laughs, shakes his head and says: “You are actually making our evening interesting.”
Paying people to break the law is surely a new low for the teals, having comprehensively rammed it down everyone’s throats that they’re lifting the standard of politics.
“People want to see politics done differently,” insisted Goldstein’s Zoe Daniel. “The public wants to see accountability and integrity,” said Zali Steggall. “You’ve told me you want more integrity in politics,” said Spender.
But here we not only have payments being provided for a “criminal act”, as it’s defined by the NSW Electoral Commission, but the Spender and Boele campaigns wouldn’t even respond to our questions about the employment status of these hired hands, how they were being paid, and whether these men were instructed to flout the rules on posting corflutes to power poles.
The poles are considered private property belonging to Ausgrid, majority owned by the taxpayer, and it’s Ausgrid’s resources that end up being used to take the corflutes down.
And it’s astounding that Boele and Spender would remain silent, given their professed commitment to transparency. There is literally an entire section of Spender’s website devoted to the issue, where every $10 donation to her campaign is compulsively, pointlessly listed, even though that’s not the transparency people give a damn about.
Spender bills herself as a white knight of integrity all while exhibiting howlingly poor errors of judgment that belong in the muck of the politics she claims to abhor.
Until a week ago Spender hadn’t disclosed her role in seven different companies. She paid for teal agitprop to be published by a social media influencer, but didn’t disclose the financial transaction between them.
The teals want so badly to be a part of the law-making machinery of this country but they’re picky about the rules they’d like to follow.
“All the candidates in Wentworth are putting corflutes on poles,” said Spender’s spokesman a few days ago, a level of arrogance and cavalier disregard for the rules that’s powering not just her campaign, but that of Boele and every other teal candidate running for office.
Because it’s also well organised, these nightly bill-posting missions. Same guys, same shoes, same hair, same goatee and stepladder.
Which is remarkable in itself, considering the teals keep telling us they’re a disparate group of budding independent candidates, each of them sui generis, not unified by any political party or brand.
And they say that with a straight face, all while receiving generous waterings of cash from Simon Holmes a Court and his Climate 200 mothership.
https://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/margin-call/teal-foreign-workers-posting-election-posters-on-power-poles-caught-on-video-abusing-voters/news-story/06a3477499bed56dae129099394dd0a3
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50892
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22931977 (191309ZAPR25) Notable: ‘Chilling’ video shows surgeon stomping on Monique Ryan corflute - A Melbourne surgeon has admitted tearing down a Dr Monique Ryan election sign before tutoring men in how to “bury the body” in a video that has outraged anti-violence campaigners and politicians. A video circulating on social media shows Professor Greg Malham praising US President Donald Trump after tearing down the teal Kooyong MP’s corflute before bundling it into the boot of a car and addressing “the boys”. In a second scene at another location, Malham, who is clearly identifiable in the video, removes the sign from the car’s boot and begins stomping on it before burying it under rubbish in a roadside skip. “Just finishing the job, boys. Always gotta bury the body,” he says in the recording. “Just remember these tutorials. It is all about technique, Nigel. Always remember guys, good technique, then dispose of the evidence. Always remember boys, bury the body under concrete.” Asked about the video, Malham - who specialises in spine surgery and has worked at hospitals including Epworth Richmond – told this masthead “it was a silly thing to do”. “It was intended as a joke, but I recognise how bad it looks,” he said. “I have already refunded the money for the sign to Dr Ryan’s campaign, and a bit extra.” A spokesperson for Ryan’s campaign confirmed that a donation made by Malham had been rejected and his money refunded. Respect Victoria chair Professor Kate Fitz-Gibbon said the clip showed a gendered threat directed at a woman in public life and that nobody should dismiss the attack as being “just politics”. “Violence and threats directed at women - whether online or in real life – create a climate of fear,” Fitz-Gibbon said. “This video is a stark reminder of the breadth of harmful misogynistic attitudes across the community. “What we saw in that video was not just vandalism - it was a chilling display of misogyny and intimidation.”
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50833
>>50822
>>50891
‘Chilling’ video shows surgeon stomping on Monique Ryan corflute
Grant McArthur - April 18, 2025
A Melbourne surgeon has admitted tearing down a Dr Monique Ryan election sign before tutoring men in how to “bury the body” in a video that has outraged anti-violence campaigners and politicians.
A video circulating on social media shows Professor Greg Malham praising US President Donald Trump after tearing down the teal Kooyong MP’s corflute before bundling it into the boot of a car and addressing “the boys”.
In a second scene at another location, Malham, who is clearly identifiable in the video, removes the sign from the car’s boot and begins stomping on it before burying it under rubbish in a roadside skip.
“Just finishing the job, boys. Always gotta bury the body,” he says in the recording.
“Just remember these tutorials. It is all about technique, Nigel. Always remember guys, good technique, then dispose of the evidence.
“Always remember boys, bury the body under concrete.”
Asked about the video, Malham – who specialises in spine surgery and has worked at hospitals including Epworth Richmond – told this masthead “it was a silly thing to do”.
“It was intended as a joke, but I recognise how bad it looks,” he said.
“I have already refunded the money for the sign to Dr Ryan’s campaign, and a bit extra.”
A spokesperson for Ryan’s campaign confirmed that a donation made by Malham had been rejected and his money refunded.
Respect Victoria chair Professor Kate Fitz-Gibbon said the clip showed a gendered threat directed at a woman in public life and that nobody should dismiss the attack as being “just politics”.
“Violence and threats directed at women – whether online or in real life – create a climate of fear,” Fitz-Gibbon said.
“This video is a stark reminder of the breadth of harmful misogynistic attitudes across the community.
“What we saw in that video was not just vandalism – it was a chilling display of misogyny and intimidation.”
Despite violence against women and girls being declared a national crisis last year, Fitz-Gibbon said there had been no leadership shown on the issue during the federal election campaign.
Ryan – a paediatric neurologist, researcher and professor prior to her political career – said the video was deeply concerning, but not an isolated incident.
“We’ve seen groups from both within and outside Kooyong stoking division through aggressively negative advertising,” she said.
“It’s creating a climate of hostility that is distressing to candidates, volunteers and the broader community.
“I’m aware that similar incidents have also affected my opponent, and I unequivocally condemn this behaviour in all its forms. There’s no place in Australian electoral campaigns or society for violence and aggression.”
In a statement to this masthead, the Epworth said: “Professor Malham is a private medical specialist who, like all surgeons, operates at, but is not employed by, Epworth.
“Epworth [has] asked Professor Malham for an explanation. We are making no further comment as it is a matter for Professor Malham.”
Goldstein independent MP Zoe Daniel has slammed the video as “an apparent endorsement of violence against women”.
“Could there be a clearer metaphor to enable violence against women?” Daniels asked in a video posted to her social media accounts.
“I feel sick,” she said. “This has to be called out by men in leadership positions who are in a position to do something and so far have mentioned violence against women barely, if at all, during this campaign.”
Kooyong Liberal candidate Amelia Hamer said the man in the video was not a party member, and condemned the content.
“There’s no place in politics for the destruction of campaign signs or any kind of intimidation – regardless of who the candidate or party is. Respectful debate and democratic participation are the cornerstones of a healthy political system.”
Malham was appointed an adjunct professor at Swinburne University in 2020.
A university spokesman said this was an unpaid and honorary title.
“He has no ongoing connection with the university, and has not for some time,” the spokesman said.
“The actions in the video are abhorrent and are completely at odds with Swinburne’s values.”
https://www.theage.com.au/politics/victoria/chilling-video-captures-surgeon-tearing-down-monique-ryan-corflute-before-stomping-on-it-and-burying-it-20250418-p5lst4.html
https://www.facebook.com/reel/1010301024392170
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50893
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22932048 (191330ZAPR25) Notable: Morrison won’t say whether Dutton will repeat his ‘miracle’ win - Good Friday brought together political adversaries among 20,000 faithful at the Maronite Christian Monastery of Saint Charbel in Sydney’s west. Local Labor member Tony Burke was there, as was neighbouring Liberal David Coleman with a visiting couple: the Duttons. But so was Scott Morrison and his wife Jenny, making a rare appearance on the campaign trail. Morrison, a devout Pentecostal Christian who declared his 2019 election win a “miracle”, politely declined to say whether he thought Dutton would do the same - or discuss politics at all. “Happy to be here with the Maronite community,” Morrison said. “Jenny and I have a long-standing relationship with them. We’re here every year and we’re going to go and have a meal with them.” It was a community in full force, spilling out of the church’s grounds onto nearby roads, footpaths and homes to listen to hymns in Arabic and English. Parishioners watched a re-enactment of the crucifixion of Jesus Christ. Peter and Kirilly Dutton, largely, were just a couple in the crowd. But some were pleased he was there. Daniel Azar, 21, said his vote would be swayed by whether a politician would take a conservative stance on issues such as abortion and voluntary euthanasia. “Seeing Peter Dutton at church today for Good Friday, to witness the crucifixion of Jesus Christ, shows that people in power, in political power, can see us and recognise us as Catholics and as humans,” Azar said.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50833
Morrison won’t say whether Dutton will repeat his ‘miracle’ win
Olivia Ireland - April 18, 2025
Good Friday brought together political adversaries among 20,000 faithful at the Maronite Christian Monastery of Saint Charbel in Sydney’s west.
Local Labor member Tony Burke was there, as was neighbouring Liberal David Coleman with a visiting couple: the Duttons. But so was Scott Morrison and his wife Jenny, making a rare appearance on the campaign trail.
Morrison, a devout Pentecostal Christian who declared his 2019 election win a “miracle”, politely declined to say whether he thought Dutton would do the same – or discuss politics at all.
“Happy to be here with the Maronite community,” Morrison said. “Jenny and I have a long-standing relationship with them. We’re here every year and we’re going to go and have a meal with them.”
It was a community in full force, spilling out of the church’s grounds onto nearby roads, footpaths and homes to listen to hymns in Arabic and English. Parishioners watched a re-enactment of the crucifixion of Jesus Christ.
Peter and Kirilly Dutton, largely, were just a couple in the crowd. But some were pleased he was there. Daniel Azar, 21, said his vote would be swayed by whether a politician would take a conservative stance on issues such as abortion and voluntary euthanasia.
“Seeing Peter Dutton at church today for Good Friday, to witness the crucifixion of Jesus Christ, shows that people in power, in political power, can see us and recognise us as Catholics and as humans,” Azar said.
But Dutton’s presence alone was not enough to decide his vote, Azar said, who noted Burke had pledged $8 million to upgrade the church’s facilities.
While Dutton was departing from his traditional campaign routine of visiting petrol stations to spruik his planned fuel excise cut, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese visited a dog park in northern Sydney with local member Jerome Laxale.
Dutton, too, made time for those not celebrating Easter, attending the 37th Australian Sikh Games at the Crest Sporting Complex in Bass Hill, seven kilometres west of Saint Charbel, later on Friday afternoon.
The opposition leader, with his wife, made a beeline through the festival surrounded by a circle of supporters and security.
One group of men said they would never vote for Dutton because of his migration policies when he was home affairs minister, while another said their dislike of Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s conservatism meant they could not bring themselves to vote for a conservative Australian politician. And a child running past yelled: “What’s he doing here? Ticking off the diversity box?”
Others were pleased with the opposition leader’s presence. As he spoke from the oval celebrating the “amazing Indian community”, a young girl crept over to him grinning, and shared a quiet conversation with Dutton.
Easter, Dutton said, was all about family, no matter one’s faith. A journalist called out asking if Dutton personally had a faith. He did not answer.
https://www.theage.com.au/politics/federal/morrison-won-t-say-whether-dutton-will-repeat-his-miracle-win-20250418-p5lsrz.html
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50894
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22932112 (191341ZAPR25) Notable: Election 2025: Labor confident of claiming majority - Anthony Albanese’s top strategists believe he is edging closer to claiming a majority government victory on the back of a recovery in NSW and Victoria, as Coalition insiders concede their hit-list of winnable Labor seats is rapidly diminishing two weeks out from polling day. Senior ALP figures and MPs are reporting growing optimism that Labor will win enough seats to offset any losses to the Coalition. Amid growing anxiety in Coalition ranks over policy cut-through, election tactics and the damaging effects of Labor’s scare campaigns, opposition tacticians now think Peter Dutton’s path to victory has dramatically narrowed since January. The ALP-held marginal seats of Gilmore on the NSW south coast and Aston in suburban Melbourne have been nominated as the only certainties expected to fall to the Coalition, alongside likely gains in Bennelong, Ryan and Monash. Top targets for Labor to offset losses include the Greens’ Queensland seats of Griffith and Brisbane, where the ALP is understood to have its nose ahead in a tight three-cornered contest. Despite rising confidence in Labor ranks, an ALP powerbroker warned that the party was “still under a lot of water” in Victoria and that results in Melbourne seats such as McEwen and Chisholm could come down to preferences and how much the Coalition gains from minor parties. Ahead of pre-polling centres opening on Tuesday, the senior Labor figure also cautioned that 20 per cent of voters remain undecided, which heaps pressure on the leaders to avoid mistakes in the final fortnight of the campaign. Both of the major parties are bracing for historically low primary votes, which means preferences from the Greens, One Nation, Clive Palmer’s Trumpet of Patriots and independents will be pivotal.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50833
>>50883
>>50885
Election 2025: Labor confident of claiming majority
GEOFF CHAMBERS and GREG BROWN - April 18, 2025
1/2
Anthony Albanese’s top strategists believe he is edging closer to claiming a majority government victory on the back of a recovery in NSW and Victoria, as Coalition insiders concede their hit-list of winnable Labor seats is rapidly diminishing two weeks out from polling day.
Senior ALP figures and MPs are reporting growing optimism that Labor will win enough seats to offset any losses to the Coalition.
Amid growing anxiety in Coalition ranks over policy cut-through, election tactics and the damaging effects of Labor’s scare campaigns, opposition tacticians now think Peter Dutton’s path to victory has dramatically narrowed since January.
The ALP-held marginal seats of Gilmore on the NSW south coast and Aston in suburban Melbourne have been nominated as the only certainties expected to fall to the Coalition, alongside likely gains in Bennelong, Ryan and Monash.
Top targets for Labor to offset losses include the Greens’ Queensland seats of Griffith and Brisbane, where the ALP is understood to have its nose ahead in a tight three-cornered contest.
Despite rising confidence in Labor ranks, an ALP powerbroker warned that the party was “still under a lot of water” in Victoria and that results in Melbourne seats such as McEwen and Chisholm could come down to preferences and how much the Coalition gains from minor parties.
Ahead of pre-polling centres opening on Tuesday, the senior Labor figure also cautioned that 20 per cent of voters remain undecided, which heaps pressure on the leaders to avoid mistakes in the final fortnight of the campaign. Both of the major parties are bracing for historically low primary votes, which means preferences from the Greens, One Nation, Clive Palmer’s Trumpet of Patriots and independents will be pivotal.
Labor and Coalition sources said Mr Dutton had struggled to recover from the working-from-home policy he was forced to ditch, Mr Albanese linking the Liberal leader’s election agenda to Donald Trump, and ALP and teal scare campaigns targeting his commitment to climate change and plan to build seven nuclear reactors.
Coalition figures are concerned about a stabilisation for Labor in NSW, which has strengthened ALP support in top Liberal target seats including Paterson in the Hunter region, Werriwa in western Sydney and Robertson on the Central Coast.
In the wake of a polling surge away from the Opposition Leader and Coalition, dozens of outer-suburban, regional and inner-city seats that Liberal and Nationals strategists had hoped to win have become either neck-and-neck or out of reach.
A Coalition source said while Mr Dutton could still pick up seats in NSW, Victoria, South Australia, Tasmania, Western Australia and the Northern Territory, the “pathway in every state is narrowing fast”.
“At the start of the year the Coalition was in a position to beat an unpopular first-term government,” the source said. “Very few first-term governments have been this bad. After that swing in the polls to the Coalition following the voice, we have squandered it.
“The polling results disguised structural problems, policy depth and capability sets that have been exposed during the campaign.
“There are so many factors that would have to go perfectly now. We’d have to see all of that anger towards the Victorian state Labor and Albanese governments convert into dramatic swings to us, and win the 50-50 contests across the country.”
Multiple Coalition insiders lamented that senior Liberal and Nationals frontbenchers and strategists were being frozen out of key decision-making and day-to-day campaigning, and claimed that policy had been drawn up on the run, with shadow cabinet expenditure review committee meetings convened on election-eve and mid-campaign to sign-off on key measures.
Coalition sources also believe it was a mistake for Mr Dutton to have appointed Jacinta Price as opposition government efficiency spokeswoman. Some described borrowing Elon Musk’s DOGE-like concept as an “own goal”, which had been ruthlessly weaponised by Labor.
Several senior Labor figures told The Australian a majority government was in sight, with suburban voters shifting back to the Albanese government on the back of an “unconvincing campaign” by Mr Dutton. This is a distinct shift from March, when most Labor figures were preparing for minority government at best.
A Labor minister told The Australian that the feedback from voters was: “We’re disappointed because we thought you would do better. The baseball bats aren’t out, but there is a level of disappointment … the feeling is that they are willing to give us another go and don’t want to risk it on Dutton”.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50895
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22932226 (191405ZAPR25) Notable: OPINION: Messiah to pariah - Dutton stopped believing in Trump, and now we know why - "The US president had unsettled the election campaign from the outset. But in the past couple of weeks, the tangerine titan had become totally toxic. And the pollsters can tell us precisely when it happened. “When you speak to people in focus groups, it had gone from a mood for change, a desire to do something about the cost of living, to do anything about the cost of living, to feeling insecure,” says the Resolve Strategic’s Jim Reed, pollster for this masthead. “Change was starting to look risky.” And the mood switch struck suddenly. “Almost immediately” after Trump’s announcement of global tariffs, the so-called Liberation Day, which was successful mostly in liberating people from their life savings. He takes us into a focus group he conducted shortly after the Trump shock: “One over-55 voter said it was the first time he’d checked his superannuation balance twice in one week.” It was a “deeply upsetting” experience for him, says Barry. “Even if you’re nowhere near retirement, your shares go down, your super goes down, you feel less confident about the future, even if you’re in your 40s or 50s. ‘My nest egg is a bit smaller - who’s doing something about it?’.”" - Peter Hartcher, political and international editor - theage.com.au
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50833
>>50883
>>50885
OPINION: Messiah to pariah - Dutton stopped believing in Trump, and now we know why
Peter Hartcher, Political and international editor - April 19, 2025
1/2
It wasn’t too long ago that many Coalition members looked to Donald Trump as their messiah.
A little over two months ago, Peter Dutton said: “So, what I’d say about President Trump, and I think a lot of people realise this, but I think a lot are coming to grips with it as well, is he’s a big thinker and a dealmaker. He’s not become the president of the United States for a second time by being anything other than shrewd. You’ve seen it in his business life, and the art of the deal is incredibly important to him.”
The opposition leader rejoiced in Trump’s political halo and sought to share in its glow. “The question Australians should ask themselves is this: Who is better placed to manage the US relationship and engage with President Trump?” posed Dutton a month ago.
“I do believe that, if there’s a change of government, I will be able to work with the Trump administration Mark II to get better outcomes for Australians.”
But this week, in a premonition of Easter, perhaps, Peter denied the messiah three times. When David Speers asked Dutton during Wednesday’s leaders’ debate whether he trusted Trump, Dutton said, “we trust the US” but that “I don’t know the president”. That was the first denial.
Next, Dutton said: “I’ve not met him.” That was the second. On further prompting by Speers, Dutton denied Trump a third time: “I don’t know. I don’t know Donald Trump is my point.”
In the Gospels, when Jesus was in trouble, a fearful apostle Peter denied him three times and then, realising his betrayal, went outside and wept bitterly. But this is an election campaign, and it’s not about loyalty to the onetime messiah but winning. In the space of a few weeks, Trump had gone from potential Coalition asset to real liability. Dutton distanced himself as the situation demanded, with no regrets.
He even went a step further and tried to associate Anthony Albanese with Trump. Dutton said that while he’d not met Trump, “the prime minister obviously has been able to” speak with him in a couple of phone calls. Was this the same opposition leader who’d been criticising Albanese earlier for not being able to get Trump on the phone?
The US president had unsettled the election campaign from the outset. But in the past couple of weeks, the tangerine titan had become totally toxic. And the pollsters can tell us precisely when it happened.
“When you speak to people in focus groups, it had gone from a mood for change, a desire to do something about the cost of living, to do anything about the cost of living, to feeling insecure,” says the Resolve Strategic’s Jim Reed, pollster for this masthead. “Change was starting to look risky.”
And the mood switch struck suddenly. “Almost immediately” after Trump’s announcement of global tariffs, the so-called Liberation Day, which was successful mostly in liberating people from their life savings.
To Redbridge director Tony Barry, Trump’s big tariff announcement on April 2, and the sharemarket crunch it precipitated, was “a hammer blow. I don’t think people realise what a massive impact that has had”.
But does the Australian electorate really pay so much attention to offshore developments? “In our research that we do for News Corp, Donald Trump went from a net favourability rating of negative 30 to negative 60, so people obviously are paying attention,” Barry says.
“When the sharemarket crashed, as in any time of uncertainty and crisis, like September 11 or the global financial crisis or COVID, any change of government is asking people to accept more risk. In an uncertain world, you look for security. Better the devil you know, and they’re the exact words people are using in focus groups.”
And the devil they know is the Albanese government. “People find comfort in what they know,” says Barry, a former Liberal campaign director. “I don’t think I can overstate the impact that it’s had.” Barry says the fear and uncertainty generated by Trump is even worse than that of the financial crisis: “The GFC was a liquidity problem, and we knew it would end eventually, but Trump is just complete uncertainty.”
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50896
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22932284 (191417ZAPR25) Notable: Opinion: Donald Trump’s tariffs may be Anthony Albanese’s Tampa crisis - "Two weeks can be an eternity in politics but Peter Dutton’s dream of forming a government is surely over now. The Easter and Anzac Day holiday breaks and Tuesday’s pre-poll kick-off make that more certain. Only a dramatic unforeseen event could change his fortunes. For many months before the calling of the election, the Coalition continued to be backed heavily by the betting agencies. It was the favourite with the bookies for a long time. In the last Newspoll before US President Donald Trump’s tariff announcement, the Opposition Leader led 39-31 on the primary vote and was ahead 51-49 on a two-party-preferred basis. So, what changed? For a start, Anthony Albanese’s election timing was spot-on. The irony is, Cyclone Alfred upset the Prime Minister’s plans but also gave him early momentum. When responded to well, natural disasters provide an opportunity to help people in need and to look prime ministerial. Albanese did both, and he did them well. Then came Trump’s tariffs. The tariff announcement was for Albanese what the 2001 MV Tampa asylum-seeker stand-off was for John Howard. Howard was struggling in the first half of that year but three months out from the 2001 election the Tampa crisis - and Labor’s responses to it – dramatically changed the electoral fortunes of the major parties. The images of our special forces soldiers forcibly boarding the accidental rescue ship seared the drama into the minds of voters. Now Labor is working hard to capitalise on Trump’s policies by taking every opportunity to link Dutton to the methods of the great disrupter." - Joel Fitzgibbon Labor member for the NSW seat of Hunter, 1996-2022 - theaustralian.com.au
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50833
>>50883
>>50885
Donald Trump’s tariffs may be Anthony Albanese’s Tampa crisis
Joel Fitzgibbon - April 18, 2025
1/2
Two weeks can be an eternity in politics but Peter Dutton’s dream of forming a government is surely over now.
The Easter and Anzac Day holiday breaks and Tuesday’s pre-poll kick-off make that more certain. Only a dramatic unforeseen event could change his fortunes.
For many months before the calling of the election, the Coalition continued to be backed heavily by the betting agencies. It was the favourite with the bookies for a long time.
In the last Newspoll before US President Donald Trump’s tariff announcement, the Opposition Leader led 39-31 on the primary vote and was ahead 51-49 on a two-party-preferred basis.
So, what changed?
For a start, Anthony Albanese’s election timing was spot-on. The irony is, Cyclone Alfred upset the Prime Minister’s plans but also gave him early momentum. When responded to well, natural disasters provide an opportunity to help people in need and to look prime ministerial. Albanese did both, and he did them well.
Then came Trump’s tariffs. The tariff announcement was for Albanese what the 2001 MV Tampa asylum-seeker stand-off was for John Howard. Howard was struggling in the first half of that year but three months out from the 2001 election the Tampa crisis – and Labor’s responses to it – dramatically changed the electoral fortunes of the major parties. The images of our special forces soldiers forcibly boarding the accidental rescue ship seared the drama into the minds of voters.
Howard capitalised further on the drama by rushing amendments to Australia’s migration laws into the parliament, hoping no doubt the Labor opposition would oppose them. His wish came true. Oh dear, I remember that well!
Now Labor is working hard to capitalise on Trump’s policies by taking every opportunity to link Dutton to the methods of the great disrupter. And on this front Labor has had a bit of help from enemy forces.
While Trump’s behaviour started the rot, it also forced Coalition errors including obviously rushed policy announcements. These added to earlier unforced errors. The Coalition campaign has been underwhelming, to put it most politely.
Like the first debate, nothing emerged in the leaders’ clash this week that will dramatically shift the political dial. I suspect few in the Coalition camp are feeling confident that something big will change the campaign dynamic between now and polling day.
I further suspect Coalition strategists will be discussing the merits of adjusting their aspirations. That is, giving up on their hope of winning more seats than Labor, to focus on dragging Labor below 76 seats – the number Labor needs to form a government in its own right. That is, without relying on the support of minor parties or independent MPs.
That would of course involve a reallocation of money and resources to the four or five most vulnerable Labor electorates. Dutton may find this option appealing.
Sure, the thing his Liberal Party colleagues will focus on most post-election is the seat count. But, for a one-term opposition, a Labor minority would be a good result.
Further, the early period of a hung parliament is no time to be changing leadership jockeys. Dutton would be given another chance, surely made more likely by a hesitancy among other aspirants who may not think it’s a good time to successfully further their own ambitions.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50897
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22938740 (220933ZAPR25) Notable: Video: Anthony Albanese, Peter Dutton cancel election campaign events after Pope Francis' death, leaders' debate to resume - Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and Opposition Leader Dutton have paused campaigning in the wake of Pope Francis' death but will still go head to head in Tuesday night's leaders' debate. Both leaders' campaign teams have confirmed the cancellation of scheduled events as the news sends shockwaves around the world. Both leaders have paid tribute to the Pope in the wake of the shocking news, with Mr Albanese stating Francis would be "mourned by Catholics and non-Catholics alike". The Prime Minister said the Holy Father "lived out his faith and vocation in word and deed". "He was truly inspirational in his modest way of life and at his weekly audiences, he demonstrated his commitment to peace, equality and inclusion," he said in an address on Monday night. "Pope Francis's love for humanity was powerful and profound. The memory and example of his compassion will long endure as we mourn his death." Mr Dutton's tribute highlighted the pontiff's Christ-like values, declaring he "served God with the utmost devotion throughout his life”. “He was the first Pope from the Jesuit order and the first Latin American Pope,” he said in a statement. “He lived frugally and simply. Above all else, he was driven by Christ’s values of mercy and forgiveness. He emphasised those values in his last Christmas address, saying, ‘God’s mercy can do all things. It unties every knot; it tears down every wall of division; God’s mercy dispels hatred and the spirit of revenge.'"
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50833
>>>/qresearch/22938708
Anthony Albanese, Peter Dutton cancel election campaign events after Pope Francis' death, leaders' debate to resume
Both major party leaders have put campaigning on hold in the wake of Pope Francis' death.
Gemma Crotty - April 22, 2025
Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and Opposition Leader Dutton have paused campaigning in the wake of Pope Francis' death but will still go head to head in Tuesday night's leaders' debate.
Both leaders' campaign teams have confirmed the cancellation of scheduled events as the news sends shockwaves around the world.
The Prime Minister begun the day in Melbourne, attending mass at St Patrick's Cathedral to pay his respects.
He was captured looking sombre as he attended the regular 7am service.
Mr Dutton is in Orange where he was scheduled to campaign alongside Nationals Leader David Littleproud after a more toned-down Easter weekend.
The Opposition Leader is scheduled to attend a church service in Sydney to pay his respects.
In an interview on Tuesday morning, he flagged the day would be mostly reserved for reflection although confirmed the Channel 9 leaders' debate would still go ahead.
"I don’t think there’s any need for over-the-top politics today. I think we can respectfully put our positions," Mr Dutton told the Today Show.
"Polling obviously opens today. There’s a leadership leaders debate tonight. I understand the Prime Minister is happy to proceed with that.
"So yeah, I think it’s a respectful day and we can state our policies, but I don’t think it needs to be an over the top day.
"I think the rest of the day really is probably best left in reflection as opposed to being out there overt politicking and I think that's something most people would respect."
Both leaders have paid tribute to the Pope in the wake of the shocking news, with Mr Albanese stating Francis would be "mourned by Catholics and non-Catholics alike".
The Prime Minister said the Holy Father "lived out his faith and vocation in word and deed".
"He was truly inspirational in his modest way of life and at his weekly audiences, he demonstrated his commitment to peace, equality and inclusion," he said in an address on Monday night.
"Pope Francis's love for humanity was powerful and profound. The memory and example of his compassion will long endure as we mourn his death."
Mr Dutton's tribute highlighted the pontiff's Christ-like values, declaring he "served God with the utmost devotion throughout his life”.
“He was the first Pope from the Jesuit order and the first Latin American Pope,” he said in a statement.
“He lived frugally and simply. Above all else, he was driven by Christ’s values of mercy and forgiveness.
“He emphasised those values in his last Christmas address, saying, ‘God’s mercy can do all things. It unties every knot; it tears down every wall of division; God’s mercy dispels hatred and the spirit of revenge.'"
“With God, may Pope Francis rest in peace.”
All Commonwealth flags are flying at half-mast on Tuesday in a sign of respect.
It comes as early voting has opened across the country ahead of the election in under two weeks’ time.
Hundreds of early voting booths opened as more than half of 18 million Australians who are enrolled are expected to cast their votes early.
https://www.skynews.com.au/australia-news/politics/anthony-albanese-peter-dutton-cancel-election-campaign-events-after-pope-francis-death-leaders-debate-to-resume/news-story/8d06f565ca313f592833435e9ca84ac7
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=174Bv4pzSU4
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50898
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22942998 (230921ZAPR25) Notable: Muslim Vote candidate to push for dismantling of Israel, ‘single democratic state’ in Palestine - A Muslim Vote-backed candidate aiming to dislodge Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke will push for the dismantling of the Jewish state of Israel if he enters parliament, calling for one “democratic” state of Palestinians and Israelis. Ziad Basyouny, the first independent from the Muslim community to run against a Labor incumbent, said he would also push for “reparations and reconciliations” for Palestinian refugees if he were elected in the western Sydney seat of Watson. Mr Burke and Education Minister Jason Clare are staring down the most potent Muslim Vote-backed challenges in their southwest Sydney seats, where voters are unhappy about the government’s stance on Gaza. In a statement, Dr Basyouny said if elected, he would push for to position “Australia as a potential leader in a new era of principled foreign policy, one that upholds justice and rejects apartheid, ethno-nationalism, and impunity for war crimes”. “We will no longer accept the double standards of global politics,” Dr Basyouny said. “Australia cannot claim to support democracy and human rights while turning a blind eye to apartheid and war crimes. Our policy puts values before geopolitics.” He said this would see Australia advocate for a “single democratic state in historic Palestine” and “recognition of the right of return for Palestinian refugees and support for reparations and reconciliation”.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50833
>>50819
>>50842
Muslim Vote candidate to push for dismantling of Israel, ‘single democratic state’ in Palestine
NOAH YIM - 20 April 2025
A Muslim Vote-backed candidate aiming to dislodge Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke will push for the dismantling of the Jewish state of Israel if he enters parliament, calling for one “democratic” state of Palestinians and Israelis.
Ziad Basyouny, the first independent from the Muslim community to run against a Labor incumbent, said he would also push for “reparations and reconciliations” for Palestinian refugees if he were elected in the western Sydney seat of Watson.
Dr Basyouny is originally from Cairo and a prominent local doctor.
Mr Burke and Education Minister Jason Clare are staring down the most potent Muslim Vote-backed challenges in their southwest Sydney seats, where voters are unhappy about the government’s stance on Gaza.
In a statement, Dr Basyouny said if elected, he would push for to position “Australia as a potential leader in a new era of principled foreign policy, one that upholds justice and rejects apartheid, ethno-nationalism, and impunity for war crimes”.
“We will no longer accept the double standards of global politics,” Dr Basyouny said.
“Australia cannot claim to support democracy and human rights while turning a blind eye to apartheid and war crimes. Our policy puts values before geopolitics.”He said this would see Australia advocate for a “single democratic state in historic Palestine” and “recognition of the right of return for Palestinian refugees and support for reparations and reconciliation”.
This new “unified, pluralist, democratic” state would ensure all would “live as equal citizens”, he said.
Dr Basyouny also said he would push for targeted sanctions on “companies and individuals complicit in human rights abuses in occupied Palestine”, akin to the anti-Israel BDS (boycott, divest, sanction) movement.
He also said he would focus on support for human rights movements in Sudan, the Democratic Republic of Congo, and Myanmar, as well as further investment in “global peacebuilding, reconciliation efforts, and refugee support”.
“What we are proposing is bold, but it is also just,” he said.
“As the world watches genocide unfold in Gaza, we cannot remain silent. We are offering a path to lasting peace.”
It is broadly expected the Muslim Vote-backed candidates face an uphill climb in the federal election, especially after the Liberals’ how-to-vote cards preferenced Labor above the independent candidates.
There is also a split in the Muslim community on the ground in those electorates, with community leader and local doctor Jamal Rifi recently saying it would be a “tragedy” if those candidates were to succeed by shifting enough votes to unseat Labor incumbents.
“Muslim Votes is a mix of the aggressive left, of opportunists, cynics, and the naive, with some undercover Liberal support in certain electorates, and idealists unaware of the strange amalgam which is this grouping,” he wrote.
He accused the organisation of “deliberately manipulating the Palestinian cause”.
There were cases in recent US and UK elections that saw large swings and candidates get in over community discontent on government stances on Gaza.
https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/muslim-vote-candidate-to-push-for-dismantling-of-israel-single-democratic-state-in-palestine/news-story/6e1b9c9ed4eb8ca35ae75923cc06c448
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50899
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22943004 (230929ZAPR25) Notable: Election 2025: Anthony Albanese’s preference for Israel-hating radical - Anthony Albanese is directing supporters in his seat of Grayndler to give their second votes to a Greens candidate who claims Israel is guilty of genocide and demands the Prime Minister blacklist the Jewish state and expel its ambassador. As almost all of Labor’s frontbench get into preference deals with the anti-Israel party, Mr Albanese has put Greens candidate Hannah Thomas as his number two recommendation to voters without identifying which party she represents on his how-to-vote card. The preference swap comes despite Mr Albanese’s own claims that the Greens are spreading misinformation on the Israel-Hamas war and that he will not be negotiating with them in a hung parliament. The nation’s peak Jewish body on Tuesday criticised Mr Albanese’s preference stance, saying he was “uplifting and rewarding” the political extremists in the Greens with his voting recommendation. And after five days of silence on his vote-swapping deal with the Greens in his safe outer-Melbourne seat of Isaacs, Attorney-General Mark Dreyfus on Tuesday repeatedly told The Australian that the how-to-vote cards he was giving out to voters at pre-poll stations at the time were “a matter for the party”. Almost every other member of the Albanese ministry with publicly disclosed how-to-vote cards - from Jim Chalmers and Richard Marles down to assistant ministers and “special envoys” – have also directed voters to give the Greens their number two preferences.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50833
>>50819
>>50888
Election 2025: Anthony Albanese’s preference for Israel-hating radical
RICHARD FERGUSON - 22 April 2025
1/2
Anthony Albanese is directing supporters in his seat of Grayndler to give their second votes to a Greens candidate who claims Israel is guilty of genocide and demands the Prime Minister blacklist the Jewish state and expel its ambassador.
As almost all of Labor’s frontbench get into preference deals with the anti-Israel party, Mr Albanese has put Greens candidate Hannah Thomas as his number two recommendation to voters without identifying which party she represents on his how-to-vote card.
The preference swap comes despite Mr Albanese’s own claims that the Greens are spreading misinformation on the Israel-Hamas war and that he will not be negotiating with them in a hung parliament.
The nation’s peak Jewish body on Tuesday criticised Mr Albanese’s preference stance, saying he was “uplifting and rewarding” the political extremists in the Greens with his voting recommendation.
And after five days of silence on his vote-swapping deal with the Greens in his safe outer-Melbourne seat of Isaacs, Attorney-General Mark Dreyfus on Tuesday repeatedly told The Australian that the how-to-vote cards he was giving out to voters at pre-poll stations at the time were “a matter for the party”.
Almost every other member of the Albanese ministry with publicly disclosed how-to-vote cards – from Jim Chalmers and Richard Marles down to assistant ministers and “special envoys” – have also directed voters to give the Greens their number two preferences.
The two exceptions are Defence Industry Minister Pat Conroy, who has given his second preference in the NSW central coast seat of Shortland to an independent, and special envoy for social cohesion Peter Khalil, who is facing a tense battle with the Greens to hold on to the Wills electorate.
Mr Albanese’s own Greens challenger, Ms Thomas, has said to vote for the Greens is to “vote with Palestine”, that the Albanese government is complicit in “genocide” in the Gaza Strip, and that it should help the International Criminal Court lock up Israel’s democratically elected leader, Benjamin Netanyahu.
“The Prime Minister could absolutely make a difference … He could sanction Israel, he could enforce the IC (sic) ruling, he could expel the Israeli ambassador, he could stop military trade, he could recognise Palestine,” she told a Sydney anti-Israel rally in March.
Labor’s state secretaries, federal campaign headquarters and Mr Albanese’s office did not respond to questions on his preferences, the scores of other pro-Greens vote-swapping deals, and why the Melbourne seats of Wills and Macnamara – where the Greens have been put third and Labor is running an open ticket respectively – were considered exceptions.
Executive Council of Australian Jewry co-chief executive Alex Ryvchin told The Australian that it was “profoundly disturbing” that Mr Albanese was directing second preferences to a party and a candidate that had accused him personally of genocide.
“When the Prime Minister approves any sort of deal with such a party and tells voters in his seat to put the candidate second, it tells the country that the Greens are legitimate and one can do deals with political extremists,” he said on Tuesday. “The Prime Minister should be excoriating them for libelling our community and his own government, not uplifting and rewarding them.”
Australia/Israel and Jewish Affairs Council executive director Colin Rubenstein said: “We implore both major parties to place all candidates involved in extremist anti-Israel agitation or fomenting hatred against Jews at the bottom of their preference lists and to do so in all seats without exception.”
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50900
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22943017 (230940ZAPR25) Notable: Video: Anthony Albanese gags anti-Greens Labor MP Josh Burns - Anthony Albanese has muzzled the only Labor MP who has refused to preference the Greens, as the Prime Minister faces an angry backlash from Jewish leaders over vote-swapping deals with the anti-Israel party and the ALP spends millions of dollars sandbagging at-risk electorates. Amid rising concerns in Labor ranks about losing the Melbourne seats of Macnamara, Wills, Aston, McEwen and potentially Chisholm to the Liberals and Greens, Mr Albanese on Monday shut down questions to Josh Burns about his decision to leave his preferences open. On a campaign stop in St Kilda, in the heart of Mr Burns’s seat of Macnamara, Mr Albanese raised his hand and said “thanks a lot” when The Australian asked the Labor backbencher about his open ticket. Macnamara, being targeted by the Greens and Liberals, is home to a sizeable Jewish-Australian community and the Adass Israel Synagogue, which was firebombed in an anti-Semitic attack last year. After ducking and weaving during the campaign on Labor preference deals with the Greens, the release of how-to-vote cards last week confirmed that senior Labor ministers including Mark Dreyfus had preferenced the radical left-wing party for the May 3 election. Mr Burns, who is Jewish, declined to comment when asked about the Prime Minister’s intervention to block questions about Mr Dreyfus’s preference deal with the Greens. A Labor source played down the incident, describing it as nothing more than Mr Albanese ensuring everyone was “keeping on message” and it was “no big deal”.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50833
>>50888
>>50899
Anthony Albanese gags anti-Greens Labor MP Josh Burns
GEOFF CHAMBERS - April 21, 2025
1/2
Anthony Albanese has muzzled the only Labor MP who has refused to preference the Greens, as the Prime Minister faces an angry backlash from Jewish leaders over vote-swapping deals with the anti-Israel party and the ALP spends millions of dollars sandbagging at-risk electorates.
Amid rising concerns in Labor ranks about losing the Melbourne seats of Macnamara, Wills, Aston, McEwen and potentially Chisholm to the Liberals and Greens, Mr Albanese on Monday shut down questions to Josh Burns about his decision to leave his preferences open.
On a campaign stop in St Kilda, in the heart of Mr Burns’s seat of Macnamara, Mr Albanese raised his hand and said “thanks a lot” when The Australian asked the Labor backbencher about his open ticket. Macnamara, being targeted by the Greens and Liberals, is home to a sizeable Jewish-Australian community and the Adass Israel Synagogue, which was firebombed in an anti-Semitic attack last year.
After ducking and weaving during the campaign on Labor preference deals with the Greens, the release of how-to-vote cards last week confirmed that senior Labor ministers including Mark Dreyfus had preferenced the radical left-wing party for the May 3 election.
Mr Albanese’s intervention came as the nation’s peak Jewish body told Mr Dreyfus it would “find it difficult to believe” Labor would have refused requests from him to scrap a vote-swapping deal struck with the Greens in his safe Victorian seat of Isaacs.
In a letter obtained by The Australian, Executive Council of Australian Jewry president Daniel Aghion expressed “deep disappointment” at Labor’s decision to trade Mr Dreyfus’s preferences with the Greens.
“From your own public comments in the past, we know that you are aware of how extreme the Greens’ politics have become under their current leadership … Your colleague Josh Burns, who is a backbencher, was able to persuade the party as a matter of principle to have an open ticket for his seat of Macnamara,” Mr Aghion wrote.
“If you, as a senior cabinet minister, had pressed strongly for an open ticket in your own seat, we find it difficult to believe that the party would have refused your request.”
Mr Aghion said while the body doesn’t underrate the “excellent” work done by Mr Dreyfus – Labor’s most senior Jewish MP – to fight anti-Semitism, he would like to “build an Australia where such measures are no longer necessary”.
“Refusing to preference the Greens would have been a small but significant step in that direction,” he said.
Mr Burns, who is Jewish, declined to comment when asked about the Prime Minister’s intervention to block questions about Mr Dreyfus’s preference deal with the Greens. A Labor source played down the incident, describing it as nothing more than Mr Albanese ensuring everyone was “keeping on message” and it was “no big deal”.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50901
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22943024 (230945ZAPR25) Notable: Coalition pledges tough on crime $750m investment - Federal police will conduct an Australia-wide crackdown on illicit drugs, and pedophiles will be forced on to a national register if the Coalition wins the election, as Peter Dutton seeks a post-Easter election reset with his traditional strengths on fighting crime and boosting the military. The Coalition on Monday will announce a $750m “Operation Safer Communities”, which would see it establish a national drug enforcement and organised crime strike team to deal with drugs, tobacco and vapes, as well as a 12-month pilot national child sex offender disclosure scheme that would allow parents to apply to see whether an adult their child was interacting with was a convicted sex offender. This comes on top of other law-and-order policy pledges previously made by the Coalition, such as on anti-Semitic crimes and US-style syndicate-busting laws. The tough-on-crime push - which helped Queensland Premier David Crisafulli and Northern Territory Chief Minister Lia Finocchiaro topple Labor governments last year – will come ahead of Mr Dutton’s long-awaited policy on defence, which is expected in the lead-up to Anzac Day at the end of the week. Mr Dutton spent a low-key Easter weekend in his home state of Queensland as he seeks to bounce back in the final two weeks of the election campaign after a mixed start.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50833
Coalition pledges tough on crime $750m investment
NOAH YIM - 20 April 2025
Federal police will conduct an Australia-wide crackdown on illicit drugs, and pedophiles will be forced on to a national register if the Coalition wins the election, as Peter Dutton seeks a post-Easter election reset with his traditional strengths on fighting crime and boosting the military.
The Coalition on Monday will announce a $750m “Operation Safer Communities”, which would see it establish a national drug enforcement and organised crime strike team to deal with drugs, tobacco and vapes, as well as a 12-month pilot national child sex offender disclosure scheme that would allow parents to apply to see whether an adult their child was interacting with was a convicted sex offender. This comes on top of other law-and-order policy pledges previously made by the Coalition, such as on anti-Semitic crimes and US-style syndicate-busting laws.
The tough-on-crime push – which helped Queensland Premier David Crisafulli and Northern Territory Chief Minister Lia Finocchiaro topple Labor governments last year – will come ahead of Mr Dutton’s long-awaited policy on defence, which is expected in the lead-up to Anzac Day at the end of the week. Mr Dutton spent a low-key Easter weekend in his home state of Queensland as he seeks to bounce back in the final two weeks of the election campaign after a mixed start.
He spent Saturday morning at Sydney’s Royal Easter Show and then flew to Brisbane, where he attended a community barbecue in Brassall, in Ipswich, Queensland – in the Labor-held seat of Blair – on Easter Sunday morning.
Mr Dutton remained defiant in the face of public polling that seemed to suggest falling support for the Coalition, declaring there was a “big disparity” between that and internal polling.
The $355m national drug enforcement and organised crime strike team would put a dedicated Australian Federal Police team in each state and territory, led by a national leadership group, with specialist financial investigative and prosecutorial teams. The money from the seizure of criminal assets and the proceeds of crime will be reinvested into communities, the Coalition said.
Mr Dutton claimed “Australians feel less safe than they did three years ago and that’s because community safety has been neglected under Labor”.
“I have the experience and determination to stand up to the outlaw motorcycle gangs and organised crime syndicates which are wreaking havoc on our streets and in our communities,” he said.
“These crime gangs are selling drugs to the people who are breaking into homes and stealing valuables to pay for their drug habit. They are the people who are purchasing your car when it’s stolen. I will strengthen laws and provide more funding for our police and intelligence agencies to stop the crime gangs, protect our borders, and protect our community.”
The second plank, the $21.3m national child sex offender disclosure scheme pilot, will be modelled on programs in Britain and Western Australia, a statement said. “The scheme allows law enforcement to disclose, on application, relevant information to a parent or guardian, on a case-by-case basis, once police have undertaken the necessary checks. Information will only be released to individuals where they have a genuine relationship to the child and police determine it is appropriate.”
The scheme will be overseen by the Australian Criminal Intelligence Organisation, and state and territory law enforcement will oversee vetting. “As a former police officer, and as a father, I have always fought for the protection of children from harm,” Mr Dutton said.
“This register is an idea whose time has come – and it is now time to put it into force to protect our kids.
“The scheme will serve as a powerful deterrent to offenders and, importantly, will enable parents to be fully informed about their child’s safety.”
The Coalition has traditionally enjoyed home ground advantage on law and order, and the issue has proven to be incisive in campaign messages for the recent electoral successes of Mr Crisafulli and Ms Finocchiaro.
Mr Crisafulli successfully campaigned on “adult crime, adult time” and has since introduced laws to crack down on serious youth crimes.
Ms Finocchiaro has similarly lowered the age of criminal responsibility to 10 following a spate of youth crime in the Northern Territory, particularly in Alice Springs.
https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/coalition-pledges-tough-on-crime-750m-investment/news-story/694d9d325996c91d0d9c0ba057252cb8
https://www.theage.com.au/politics/federal/dutton-s-pledge-to-launch-national-paedophile-register-20250420-p5lt0b.html
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50902
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22943027 (230948ZAPR25) Notable: The top reasons voters are hesitant on Albanese or Dutton - and it’s worse in marginal seats - Anger over the cost of living is eroding support for Labor in Australia’s most marginal seats, highlighting the challenge for Prime Minister Anthony Albanese in gaining a convincing lead over the Coalition in the final two weeks of the campaign. An exclusive survey for this masthead by research firm Resolve Strategic shows 47 per cent of voters name the cost of living as the biggest reason for hesitating in giving their vote to Labor, ahead of other factors such as managing the economy. Results also reveal that 45 per cent name Opposition Leader Peter Dutton and his personality as the top reason they would not cast a ballot for the Coalition. The concern about Dutton has widened among voters since the Resolve Political Monitor asked the same question in February, when 35 per cent said his personality as leader was the main reason for hesitation. The findings come as senior Labor figures say they are “not taking anything for granted” despite public polls showing a swing against Dutton and the Coalition since the government unveiled an $8.5 billion boost for Medicare in February and personal tax cuts in the March 25 federal budget.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50833
>>50883
The top reasons voters are hesitant on Albanese or Dutton – and it’s worse in marginal seats
An exclusive survey for this masthead, conducted by research firm Resolve Strategic, reveals the top concerns voters have when considering either of the major parties on May 3.
David Crowe - April 20, 2025
1/2
Anger over the cost of living is eroding support for Labor in Australia’s most marginal seats, highlighting the challenge for Prime Minister Anthony Albanese in gaining a convincing lead over the Coalition in the final two weeks of the campaign.
An exclusive survey for this masthead by research firm Resolve Strategic shows 47 per cent of voters name the cost of living as the biggest reason for hesitating in giving their vote to Labor, ahead of other factors such as managing the economy.
Results also reveal that 45 per cent name Opposition Leader Peter Dutton and his personality as the top reason they would not cast a ballot for the Coalition.
The concern about Dutton has widened among voters since the Resolve Political Monitor asked the same question in February, when 35 per cent said his personality as leader was the main reason for hesitation.
The findings come as senior Labor figures say they are “not taking anything for granted” despite public polls showing a swing against Dutton and the Coalition since the government unveiled an $8.5 billion boost for Medicare in February and personal tax cuts in the March 25 federal budget.
Nationals leader David Littleproud on Sunday accused the government of running a “Mediscare” campaign with a false claim that the Coalition would cut health spending, and declared the Coalition would make no cuts to Medicare.
“We won’t tamper with it in any way, shape or form. In fact, this is a desperate diversion from a prime minister that has problems with telling the truth and is running away from his record,” he told the Seven Network.
Littleproud said the bulk-billing rate was 88 per cent when the Coalition were in government but had fallen to 77 per cent under Labor. That statement prompted the government to argue that this was because the rates were artificially high when COVID vaccinations were included during the pandemic.
Albanese attended an Easter Sunday church service at St Mary’s Cathedral in Sydney before talking about sport on the Nine Network’s (rugby league) Sunday Footy Show, while Dutton joined a community breakfast in Ipswich and made a statement to mark Easter and urge families to stay safe during the holiday.
Early voting begins on Tuesday, and the latest survey shows 30 per cent of voters are still “uncommitted” about their support.
The Resolve Political Monitor, conducted for this masthead by research firm Resolve Strategic, found in January that 39 per cent of voters were uncommitted and 61 per cent were committed when asked the same questions.
“We’re not taking anything for granted,” Employment Minister Murray Watt told Sky News on Sunday.
“In all the marginal seats around the country, things are still very close, and that’s obviously where this election will be decided.”
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50903
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22943035 (230956ZAPR25) Notable: Trumpet of Patriots candidate Jason Smart urges voters to place him last after controversial how-to-vote card - A Trumpet of Patriots candidate has urged voters to place him last on their ballot papers, saying he was “blindsided” by chairman Clive Palmer’s decision to preference Teal independents in the upcoming federal election. TOP candidate Jason Smart, who is running in the Liberal-held Victorian seat of Flinders, on Monday announced his withdrawal of support for the right-wing party and encouraged other candidates to follow suit, after controversial preference recommendations on its how-to-vote cards were revealed on Friday. The father-of-two said preferencing the Teals, Labor and the Greens was a “shocking and sinister” move by the TOP party. “My wife and I have been sitting here at home in utter disbelief since Friday morning,” Mr Smart said. “I was given an undertaking by Clive Palmer and the TOP that if I ran as a candidate for them, that the Teal, Labor (and) Greens candidates would be last on the HTV card. I only agreed to run on that basis.” Mr Smart said he would now assist the campaign of One Nation candidate Mike Brown, who had preferenced sitting Liberal MP for Flinders Zoe McKenzie. “Mike Brown of Pauline Hanson’s One Nation, has been transparent and upfront with the Australian people about their desire to see the back of Albanese,” he said. “I share that desire, and that’s why I’m asking the people of Flinders that when they vote, to put me last. A vote for the Trumpet of Patriots is a vote for the Teals, and I won’t stand for it.”
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50833
>>50779
>>50822
Trumpet of Patriots candidate Jason Smart urges voters to place him last after controversial how-to-vote card
ZOE DE KONING - April 21, 2025
A Trumpet of Patriots candidate has urged voters to place him last on their ballot papers, saying he was “blindsided” by chairman Clive Palmer’s decision to preference Teal independents in the upcoming federal election.
TOP candidate Jason Smart, who is running in the Liberal-held Victorian seat of Flinders, on Monday announced his withdrawal of support for the right-wing party and encouraged other candidates to follow suit, after controversial preference recommendations on its how-to-vote cards were revealed on Friday.
The father-of-two said preferencing the Teals, Labor and the Greens was a “shocking and sinister” move by the TOP party.
“My wife and I have been sitting here at home in utter disbelief since Friday morning,” Mr Smart said.
“I was given an undertaking by Clive Palmer and the TOP that if I ran as a candidate for them, that the Teal, Labor (and) Greens candidates would be last on the HTV card.
“I only agreed to run on that basis.”
It comes after Teal candidate for Flinders Ben Smith was placed second on the party’s how-to-vote card, a decision Mr Smart said directly opposed his campaigning efforts over the past month.
“If Clive Palmer thinks I’m going to put my love for my country to the side so he can try and gain some political relevance, he’s dead wrong,” he said.
“I’m nobody’s chump”.
Now the third federal election candidate to withdraw following the close of nominations on April 10, Mr Smart said he would now assist the campaign of One Nation candidate Mike Brown, who had preferenced sitting Liberal MP for Flinders Zoe McKenzie.
“Mike Brown of Pauline Hanson’s One Nation, has been transparent and upfront with the Australian people about their desire to see the back of Albanese,” he said.
“I share that desire, and that’s why I’m asking the people of Flinders that when they vote, to put me last.
“A vote for the Trumpet of Patriots is a vote for the Teals, and I won’t stand for it.”
Mr Smart is praised on the TOP website as a “strong advocate for policies that put Australian workers and businesses first”.
The Australian has contacted the Trumpet of Patriots for comment.
https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/trumpet-of-patriots-candidate-jason-smart-urges-voters-to-place-him-last-after-controversial-howtovote-card/news-story/142333c311ce84ab007762427757583c
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50956
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22645646 (241018ZFEB25) Notable: ASIO chief made secret China trip to meet Xi’s top spy - Australia’s spy chief made a secret visit to China to meet the country’s top intelligence officials in an unprecedented effort to open up channels of backdoor communication amid major tensions between Beijing and Canberra. The revelation of ASIO director-general Mike Burgess’ clandestine mid-2023 trip to Beijing, months before Prime Minister Anthony Albanese’s very public China mission, casts rare light on the delicate and complex relationship between the two nations’ spy agencies as they try to undermine each other’s operations while advancing their respective national interests. It also comes amid a fresh round of tension between China and Australia after the Chinese navy conducted live-fire exercises in the Tasman Sea, forcing airlines to divert flights and drawing criticism from Australia and New Zealand. Political sources, speaking anonymously to discuss confidential information, confirmed the trip and said it highlighted Burgess’ belief that closed-door spy-to-spy diplomacy would aid Australian efforts to resist Beijing’s aggressive intelligence and influence operations. Pressed about the trip during an interview with 60 Minutes, Burgess refused to confirm it had occurred or offer any details about its purpose. But political sources described Burgess as having “politely but very firmly” pushed his Chinese spying adversaries on their activities in Australia that he believed crossed a red line, even in the shadowy and murky world of spying.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50709
ASIO chief made secret China trip to meet Xi’s top spy
Nick McKenzie - February 23, 2025
1/2
Australia’s spy chief made a secret visit to China to meet the country’s top intelligence officials in an unprecedented effort to open up channels of backdoor communication amid major tensions between Beijing and Canberra.
The revelation of ASIO director-general Mike Burgess’ clandestine mid-2023 trip to Beijing, months before Prime Minister Anthony Albanese’s very public China mission, casts rare light on the delicate and complex relationship between the two nations’ spy agencies as they try to undermine each other’s operations while advancing their respective national interests.
It also comes amid a fresh round of tension between China and Australia after the Chinese navy conducted live-fire exercises in the Tasman Sea, forcing airlines to divert flights and drawing criticism from Australia and New Zealand.
Political sources, speaking anonymously to discuss confidential information, confirmed the trip and said it highlighted Burgess’ belief that closed-door spy-to-spy diplomacy would aid Australian efforts to resist Beijing’s aggressive intelligence and influence operations.
Pressed about the trip during an interview with this masthead and 60 Minutes, Burgess refused to confirm it had occurred or offer any details about its purpose.
But political sources described Burgess as having “politely but very firmly” pushed his Chinese spying adversaries on their activities in Australia that he believed crossed a red line, even in the shadowy and murky world of spying.
While Beijing and Canberra spy on each other, Australia does not seek to forcibly repatriate or physically harm its targets.
“We have relationships with some 365 foreign services, domestic services, military services and law enforcement in intelligence units in 131 countries … and some of those include relationships with countries that are problematic for us, which allows my officers and myself to have some very serious conversations in private, dealing with these particular matters,” Burgess said.
The trip mirrors a similarly secret meeting the head of the CIA held with Chinese spy chiefs in Beijing in 2023. While that event was reported by the Financial Times within weeks, Burgess’ mission to China had remained a secret.
The sources said that when Australia was publicly in, and emerging from, Beijing’s diplomatic deep freeze, Burgess’ ability to pass messages to the leaders of China’s increasingly powerful and global intelligence apparatus was especially valuable.
In contrast to Australia’s agency chiefs, China’s top spies are political operatives who must maintain favour with President Xi Jinping in order to hold their posts.
During his Beijing trip, Burgess met with State Security Minister Chen Yixin, a close ally of Xi. Chen replaced his predecessor, Chen Wenqing, after the latter was promoted to the powerful politburo, Beijing highest political body.
Burgess’ China trip highlights his strategy for dealing with Australia’s greatest contemporary intelligence adversary.
The ASIO director-general has, over six years, steadfastly refused to publicly name China in his public commentary in Australia, although he rarely calls out any country for its local hostile acts.
But he has also begun signalling with increasing vigour in his public set pieces – such as last week’s annual threat assessment speech – that his agency is waging a fierce war against Chinese intelligence operatives seeking to intimidate or harm Chinese-Australians, steal defence secrets and influence the domestic political scene.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50957
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22647135 (241712ZFEB25) Notable: China accuses Australia of ‘hyping up’ live fire drills in the South China Sea - China has accused Australia of having “hyped up” its live-fire exercises in international waters between Australia and New Zealand, as Tony Abbott warns Beijing’s naval actions are a sign of things to come if we become an “economic colony” of the Asian superpower. The ex-Liberal leader also called on the nation to step up its defence, trade and intelligence ties with Britain, Canada and New Zealand to be taken more seriously in the US. On Saturday, Chinese warships notified they would conduct live-fire exercises for the second time in as many days between Australia and New Zealand waters again with a radio broadcast notice instead of higher-level communication. Chinese Defence Ministry spokesman Wu Qian on Sunday said the People’s Liberation Army had sent repeated safety notices before the drills and that his country was “strongly dissatisfied” with Australia’s response. “China’s actions are in full compliance with international law and international practices, and will not affect aviation flight safety,” Mr Wu said in a statement. “Australia, knowing this well, made unreasonable accusations against China and deliberately hyped it up. We are deeply surprised and strongly dissatisfied with this.” Liu Xiaobo, director of the Marine Study Centre at Beijing think tank the Grandview Institution, said the PLA navy flotilla’s trip was intended to send a political message to Canberra. “The move is in response to Australia’s activities in the South China Sea, including its joint drills with The Philippines, the US and Japan,” Mr Liu, a former PLA navy officer, told The Australian.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>>/qresearch/22573780 (pb)
>>>/qresearch/22638566 (pb)
>>>/qresearch/22638582 (pb)
China accuses Australia of ‘hyping up’ live fire drills in the South China Sea
NOAH YIM and WILL GLASGOW - February 23, 2025
1/2
China has accused Australia of having “hyped up” its live-fire exercises in international waters between Australia and New Zealand, as Tony Abbott warns Beijing’s naval actions are a sign of things to come if we become an “economic colony” of the Asian superpower.
The ex-Liberal leader also called on the nation to step up its defence, trade and intelligence ties with Britain, Canada and New Zealand to be taken more seriously in the US.
On Saturday, Chinese warships notified they would conduct live-fire exercises for the second time in as many days between Australia and New Zealand waters again with a radio broadcast notice instead of higher-level communication.
Chinese Defence Ministry spokesman Wu Qian on Sunday said the People’s Liberation Army had sent repeated safety notices before the drills and that his country was “strongly dissatisfied” with Australia’s response.
“China’s actions are in full compliance with international law and international practices, and will not affect aviation flight safety,” Mr Wu said in a statement.
“Australia, knowing this well, made unreasonable accusations against China and deliberately hyped it up. We are deeply surprised and strongly dissatisfied with this.”
Liu Xiaobo, director of the Marine Study Centre at Beijing think tank the Grandview Institution, said the PLA navy flotilla’s trip was intended to send a political message to Canberra.
“The move is in response to Australia’s activities in the South China Sea, including its joint drills with The Philippines, the US and Japan,” Mr Liu, a former PLA navy officer, told The Australian.
Mr Abbott over the weekend suggested Australia, the UK, Canada and New Zealand should “become much better” at offering the US help “rather than rail against the only leader the free world currently has” following China’s posturing.
“Of course, there is an alternative to renewing alliances built on a shared history and values cherished in common,” he told the Danube Institute forum in London. “Australia could opt to become an economic colony of China. But in that event, our paymasters in Beijing would hardly allow us a freedom that their own people lack.
“As last week’s live-fire exercise off our coast shows, Beijing’s expectation is that its clients ‘tremble and obey’. Soon enough, we would find that without strength, neither peace nor freedom lasts very long.”
The ex-prime minister also said liberal democracies needed to embrace national service. “Some form of national service, if only to remind young people that citizenship is a two-way street, needs to get under way,” he said.
A Defence spokesman said the group of three Chinese warships – a frigate, a cruiser, and a replenishment vessel – “continues to conduct activities in accordance with international laws”.
“Defence continues to monitor the (three-vessel) task group while it remains in the vicinity of Australia’s maritime approaches, and is co-ordinating closely with the New Zealand Defence Force.”
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50958
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22657781 (260914ZFEB25) Notable: Chinese app slaps Aussie politicians with restrictions - MPs using China’s answer to Instagram have had their accounts restricted, with experts describing the timing as too much of a “coincidence” given efforts to win over Australian-Chinese voters at the federal election. Rednote, also known as the Little Red Book or Xiaohongshu, boasts more than 300 million users - nearly one million of whom live in Australia. Politicians in both federal and state parliaments who have been using the app, which was launched in 2013, include Liberal MP Keith Wolahan, Labor MP Jerome Laxale, teal independent Monique Ryan and Victorian Premier Jacinta Allan. Mr Wolahan, whose redrawn seat of Menzies now has the largest population of people with Chinese ancestry in the country, joined Rednote in June last year and quickly amassed about 8000 followers - more than he had on any other social media platform. But late last year, Mr Wolahan began to notice the steady growth in followers and engagement drop off and after further investigation found his account had been restricted. While still able to be accessed by those already following him, Mr Wolahan’s profile is now not able to be found by new users, in what appears to be a move by the platform that is also referred to as shadowbanning. “The restriction affected views, followers and the ability to search my account,” said Mr Wolahan, who has a separate phone from his parliamentary device for the Rednote app. “It’s disappointing.”
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>>/qresearch/22513186 (pb)
>>>/qresearch/22544535 (pb)
>>>/qresearch/22559036 (pb)
Chinese app slaps Aussie politicians with restrictions
SARAH ISON - 25 February 2025
MPs using China’s answer to Instagram have had their accounts restricted, with experts describing the timing as too much of a “coincidence” given efforts to win over Australian-Chinese voters at the federal election.
Rednote, also known as the Little Red Book or Xiaohongshu, boasts more than 300 million users – nearly one million of whom live in Australia.
Politicians in both federal and state parliaments who have been using the app, which was launched in 2013, include Liberal MP Keith Wolahan, Labor MP Jerome Laxale, teal independent Monique Ryan and Victorian Premier Jacinta Allan.
Mr Wolahan, whose redrawn seat of Menzies now has the largest population of people with Chinese ancestry in the country, joined Rednote in June last year and quickly amassed about 8000 followers – more than he had on any other social media platform.
But late last year, Mr Wolahan began to notice the steady growth in followers and engagement drop off and after further investigation found his account had been restricted.
While still able to be accessed by those already following him, Mr Wolahan’s profile is now not able to be found by new users, in what appears to be a move by the platform that is also referred to as shadowbanning.
Shadowbanning typically blocks people from seeing a certain user’s social media posts, but refers to any restrictions that limit a user’s reach and make it less likely for their content to appear in searches, hashtags, or feeds of some cohorts.
“The restriction affected views, followers and the ability to search my account,” said Mr Wolahan, who has a separate phone from his parliamentary device for the Rednote app. “It’s disappointing.”
Mr Laxale also confirmed his account had been restricted. “You now can’t search for MPs,” he said.
The Australian understands Dr Ryan’s account has also been restricted, significantly affecting the reach of her posts.
It follows New Zealand last week banning Rednote from MPs phones, along with two other Chinese-owned platforms, WeChat and Deepseek.
While Australia banned DeepSeek from government devices earlier this year, politicians are not restricted from using other Chinese apps such as WeChat, despite Coalition MPs boycotting the app under Scott Morrison’s leadership.
The boycott was quietly lifted in recent years, as the Coalition ramped up its campaign to claw back the Chinese diaspora – which sits at more than one million people. Members of the Chinese diaspora swung against the Coalition at double the rate of the national average in the 2022 election.
University of Melbourne research fellow Fan Yang said “you can’t underestimate” the importance of apps such as Rednote for the Chinese diaspora, who she had found were increasingly using the platform to have Australian government policies translated for them. “It will be important, especially ahead of the election,” she said.
CyberCX executive director of cyber intelligence Katherine Mansted said the algorithms of apps like Tiktok – which is owned by Chinese company ByteDance – had also raised questions in recent years.
“These developments … what they show is the power of social media companies. And whether it’s through an accident or an algorithmic choice, or whether it’s following foreign government directions, (they) can have a really material impact on political speech in this country,” she said.
“Social media companies make choices all the time around their algorithm. However, the timing of this (with the election) has a certain degree of coincidence.”
Ms Mansted said Rednote posed the same concerns as Deepseek, with Chinese companies “operating in a completely different legal regime”.
“They must comply with censorship by the Chinese Communist Party, they must also share information with the Chinese government on request, and they don’t have to disclose that to their users,” she said.
https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/chinese-app-slaps-aussie-politicians-with-restrictions/news-story/0b42fe5647697189942bbdc833f5170d
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50959
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22657808 (260938ZFEB25) Notable: Chinese warships re-enter Australia's Exclusive Economic Zone and head closer to Tasmania - Three Chinese warships that recently completed live-fire drills in the Tasman Sea have re-entered Australia's Exclusive Economic Zone and are currently being tracked operating east of Hobart. The Defence Department has confirmed it is working with New Zealand's military to jointly track the People's Liberation Army-Navy flotilla "in the vicinity of Australia's maritime approaches" as the task force makes its way closer to Tasmania. "Task Group 107 re-entered Australia's Exclusive Economic Zone in the early hours of this morning," the Defence Department said in a statement released on Tuesday afternoon. "PLA-N Task Group 107, comprised of the Jiangkai-class frigate Hengyang, the Renhai-class Cruiser Zunyi, and the Fuchi-class replenishment vessel Weishanhu, is operating approximately 160 nautical miles (296 kilometres) east of Hobart," the statement said. "Australia expects all militaries operating in the region to engage transparently, maintain the highest standards of safety and professionalism, and we encourage all states to maintain open communication to ensure their actions support regional security and stability. We respect the right of all states under international law to exercise freedom of navigation and overflight in international waters and airspace, just as we expect others to respect our right to do the same."
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50957
Chinese warships re-enter Australia's Exclusive Economic Zone and head closer to Tasmania
Andrew Greene - 25 February 2025
Three Chinese warships that recently completed live-fire drills in the Tasman Sea have re-entered Australia's Exclusive Economic Zone and are currently being tracked operating east of Hobart.
The Defence Department has confirmed it is working with New Zealand's military to jointly track the People's Liberation Army-Navy flotilla "in the vicinity of Australia's maritime approaches" as the task force makes its way closer to Tasmania.
"Task Group 107 re-entered Australia's Exclusive Economic Zone in the early hours of this morning," the Defence Department said in a statement released on Tuesday afternoon.
"PLA-N Task Group 107, comprised of the Jiangkai-class frigate Hengyang, the Renhai-class Cruiser Zunyi, and the Fuchi-class replenishment vessel Weishanhu, is operating approximately 160 nautical miles (296 kilometres) east of Hobart," the statement said.
"Australia expects all militaries operating in the region to engage transparently, maintain the highest standards of safety and professionalism, and we encourage all states to maintain open communication to ensure their actions support regional security and stability.
"We respect the right of all states under international law to exercise freedom of navigation and overflight in international waters and airspace, just as we expect others to respect our right to do the same."
The department has also released new images of the PLA-N warships that are being "closely monitored" by the Australian and New Zealand militaries.
At the same time, Defence released further images taken of the PLA-N task force which caused disruption to international flights across the Tasman on Friday when beginning live-fire exercises.
Appearing on the ABC's Afternoon Briefing program, government frontbencher Ed Husic said all navies were allowed to traverse international waters, but they should give adequate notice of potentially hazardous activity.
"The biggest issue is to conduct live fire you have to give notice. We provide notice 12 to 24 hours' notice when we do the same as a country. There is good reason for that. It is a safety reason."
Aviation officials have revealed they first learnt of last week's potential Chinese live-fire military exercise in the Tasman Sea after a Virgin Airlines pilot relayed warnings he had picked up mid-flight via an emergency radio frequency.
During an appearance on ABC's Q+A on Monday, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said that the action occurred outside Australia's economic zone and that notice had been given, though it would have been better if there had been more warning.
"So we put in an official protest, if you like, that more notice should have been given if this activity was to occur," he said.
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-02-25/chinese-warships-re-enter-australias-exclusive-economic-zone/104981612
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50960
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22657813 (260942ZFEB25) Notable: Video: Intelligence chief says Chinese warship deployment designed to be 'provocative' - One of Australia's most senior intelligence figures says aspects of China's deployment of three warships to the Tasman Sea appear "designed to be provocative", as the naval task group continues to be closely tracked heading back towards Tasmania. Director-general of the Office of National Intelligence (ONI) Andrew Shearer this week delivered a blunt assessment of Beijing's strategic aims for sending the heavily armed flotilla to the region, saying it was to "shape" the behaviour of states like Australia. He also described its recent live-fire exercises as unprecedented and said they demonstrated "China's growing capability to project military power into our immediate region" was "now matched by an increasing intent to do so". Appearing before a parliamentary committee on Monday night, the ONI boss observed this was "the furthest south a People's Liberation Army-Navy (PLA-N) task group has operated". "We judge Beijing intends to normalise this sort of presence, shape the responses of those in the region, and observe and learn from our reactions," he told the Senate estimates hearing. "The largest and least transparent military build-up since the Second World War will mean the PLA will be able to operate at greater distances from mainland China, in greater numbers, including into Australia's immediate seas and skies," he said.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50957
>>50959
Intelligence chief says Chinese warship deployment designed to be 'provocative'
Andrew Greene and Stephen Dziedzic - 26 February 2025
One of Australia's most senior intelligence figures says aspects of China's deployment of three warships to the Tasman Sea appear "designed to be provocative", as the naval task group continues to be closely tracked heading back towards Tasmania.
Director-general of the Office of National Intelligence (ONI) Andrew Shearer this week delivered a blunt assessment of Beijing's strategic aims for sending the heavily armed flotilla to the region, saying it was to "shape" the behaviour of states like Australia.
He also described its recent live-fire exercises as unprecedented and said they demonstrated "China's growing capability to project military power into our immediate region" was "now matched by an increasing intent to do so".
Appearing before a parliamentary committee on Monday night, the ONI boss observed this was "the furthest south a People's Liberation Army-Navy (PLA-N) task group has operated".
"We judge Beijing intends to normalise this sort of presence, shape the responses of those in the region, and observe and learn from our reactions," he told the Senate estimates hearing.
"The largest and least transparent military build-up since the Second World War will mean the PLA will be able to operate at greater distances from mainland China, in greater numbers, including into Australia's immediate seas and skies," he said.
On Tuesday, Defence confirmed the PLA-N flotilla had re-entered Australia's exclusive economic zone, where it was being closely tracked as it operated around 160 nautical miles east of Hobart.
One military figure, not authorised to speak publicly, told the ABC there was a "working assumption" that a taskforce comprising three warships so far from the Chinese mainland for weeks could have submarine support for at least part of the deployment.
Other navies that boast nuclear-powered submarines, such as the United States and the United Kingdom, are known to regularly use them during lengthy and complex warship missions to gather valuable intelligence on potential adversaries.
Meanwhile, commercial airline pilots who flew over the Tasman Sea last week have told the ABC they monitored radio communications from the Chinese warships to military surveillance aircraft as far back as a week ago, warning about possible live-firing activity.
"The Chinese vessel made a broadcast on 121.5 [VHF frequency] about a live firing drill, telling the NZ aircraft to remain at a safe distance," one international airline pilot told the ABC when describing a flight on Tuesday, February 18.
"The NZ aircraft replied that under international law they can be there, it occurred a couple of times. Many civilian aircraft heard it and told the Chinese to 'go away.'"
This week aviation officials revealed they were first informed that a Chinese live-firing exercise had begun when a Virgin Australia pilot relayed warnings they had picked up mid-flight via an emergency radio frequency.
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-02-26/chinese-warship-deployment-designed-to-be-provocative/104982224
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nLcMhmBauEs
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50961
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22657821 (260946ZFEB25) Notable: Video: Anthony Albanese ‘misled public’ over China ‘notice’ of live fire drill - Anthony Albanese has been accused of misleading the public by arguing a Chinese naval task group gave “notice” of a live fire drill off Australia’s east coast when it provided no advance warning of the exercise. Defence officials confirmed in Senate estimates that the department learned of a live fire drill by the People’s Liberation Army-Navy ships on Friday about 40 minutes after it had begun. The Chief of the Defence Force David Johnston said Defence were told of the drill about 10 minutes after a Virgin pilot relayed a Chinese radio broadcast it received about 9.58am, of a live weapons drill occuring between 9.30am to 3pm. A New Zealand frigate also heard and passed on the radio warning through defence channels, but its notification didn’t come through to Defence until 11.01am, Senate estimates heard. Admiral Johnston said the notification of the “clearly disruptive” exercise had been “inadequate”. His comments followed those of the Prime Minister, who said on Friday that “notice was given” by the Chinese of the exercise, and on Saturday that “notification did occur of this event”. On Wednesday, the Prime Minister also suggested the warning from the New Zealand navy ship was received “at around the same time” as the one from the Virgin pilot, when it was received an hour later. But Opposition home affairs spokesman James Paterson said the delayed notice meant there was no advance warning of the drill at all. “It’s not really notification of an upcoming exercise if we only find out about it after it has commenced, is it?” he told Senate estimates.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50957
>>50959
>>50960
Anthony Albanese ‘misled public’ over China ‘notice’ of live fire drill
BEN PACKHAM - 26 February 2025
Anthony Albanese has been accused of misleading the public by arguing a Chinese naval task group gave “notice” of a live fire drill off Australia’s east coast when it provided no advance warning of the exercise.
Defence officials confirmed in Senate estimates that the department learned of a live fire drill by the People’s Liberation Army-Navy ships on Friday about 40 minutes after it had begun.
The Chief of the Defence Force David Johnston said Defence were told of the drill about 10 minutes after a Virgin pilot relayed a Chinese radio broadcast it received about 9.58am, of a live weapons drill occuring between 9.30am to 3pm.
A New Zealand frigate also heard and passed on the radio warning through defence channels, but its notification didn’t come through to Defence until 11.01am, Senate estimates heard.
Admiral Johnston said the notification of the “clearly disruptive” exercise had been “inadequate”.
His comments followed those of the Prime Minister, who said on Friday that “notice was given” by the Chinese of the exercise, and on Saturday that “notification did occur of this event”.
On Wednesday, the Prime Minister also suggested the warning from the New Zealand navy ship was received “at around the same time” as the one from the Virgin pilot, when it was received an hour later.
But Opposition home affairs spokesman James Paterson said the delayed notice meant there was no advance warning of the drill at all.
“It’s not really notification of an upcoming exercise if we only find out about it after it has commenced, is it?” he told Senate estimates.
In comments to The Australian, Senator Paterson added: “The Prime Minister’s attempt to mislead the public by suggesting there was notice given by the PLA-N and it was reported through military channels in a timely way is yet more evidence of his weak leadership.
“He should be honest, admit we were never notified, and call out this malign behaviour instead of making excuses for the People’s Liberation Army-Navy.”
‘Possible’ that nuclear sub part of Chinese fleet
Admiral Johnston said it was possible a nuclear submarine was accompanying a Chinese naval task group, that was currently sailing 250km south of Hobart.
“I don’t know whether there is a submarine with them,” he said.
“It is possible. Task groups occasionally do deploy with submarines but not always. I can’t be definitive on whether that’s the case.”
Admiral Johnston said Chinese warships had operated off Australia’s south-east coastline in the past, but the latest task group was unprecedented in that they had travelled down the coast from Southeast Asia, rather than transiting north from the Southern Ocean.
On Monday, Airservices Australia chief executive Rob Sharp told the Senate hearing that the air traffic authority became aware of the danger to aircraft at 9.58am AEDT when the Virgin pilot relayed the warning. Almost 50 planes were forced to change their flight plans as a result of the exercise.
“It was in fact a Virgin Australia aircraft that advised one of our air traffic controllers that a foreign warship was broadcasting that they were conducting live firing 300 nautical miles east off our coast,” Mr Sharp said.
“At 10am our air traffic control commenced what we call a ‘hazard alert’ which basically alerts all flights in the area that there’s a hazard, so that was done within two minutes.”
Airservices Australia’s deputy chief executive, Peter Curran, said the Virgin pilot had monitored radio transmissions directly from one of the Chinese warships on a frequency that was not monitored by air traffic controllers.
“We can’t hear what was said, so the pilot of the Virgin aircraft heard what was said from the Chinese vessel, relayed that back to air traffic control (who) then passed that through our system and started giving hazard alerting to all aircraft on the frequency,” Mr Curran said.
The Albanese government has since lodged a diplomatic protest with Beijing over the drills, complaining about the lack of advance notice. Chinese Defence Ministry spokesman Wu Qian said on Sunday that the People’s Liberation Army had issued repeated safety alerts ahead of the drills and that his country was “strongly dissatisfied” with Australia’s response.
“China’s actions are in full compliance with international law and international practices, and will not affect aviation flight safety,” Mr Wu said.
“Australia, knowing this well, made unreasonable accusations against China and deliberately hyped it up. We are deeply surprised and strongly dissatisfied with this.”
https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/defence/defence-chief-says-possible-nuclear-sub-part-of-chinese-task-group/news-story/9201383228c77598845b9f29749d85f4
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jgum45Inwpo
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50962
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22657835 (260955ZFEB25) Notable: Turnbull’s ‘security’ forum more about personal vendettas - "Malcolm Turnbull has chosen 100 people, whom he describes as “leading’” defence and foreign policy thinkers, to participate in a forum at the National Press Club on Monday. The “Sovereignty and Security Forum” is necessary, Turnbull says, because “the second Trump administration is challenging and overturning assumptions about the international order, which compels close allies to re-examine the fundamentals of their foreign and defence policies”. This includes ANZUS and the AUKUS submarine pact. Unless we include half the first-year cadets at our tri-service military academy it’s doubtful we’d have anywhere close to 100 experts in these fields. But even so, there’s bound to be quite a few China apologists at the forum. Some may be tempted to cite an article that’s just been published by an Australian think tank by ANU academic Edward Chan. He argues that Australia should be looking for opportunities to collaborate with China on maritime security and ocean-related issues in areas such as transnational crime, sea lane safety and climate change. Chan notes that many countries in the region remain open to working with China on these topics, and that by being proactive in dialogue with China we’d enhance our role as a regional maritime state. But how can a state such as Australia, one that helped shape the Law of the Sea treaty in international negotiations over a decade and that abides by key maritime laws, have productive engagement with China? The People’s Republic of China is a power that’s actively and comprehensively provoking us and breaking ocean laws it’s signed up to. It’s “monstering” other nations to take their maritime territories and land features in their offshore zones. China has ignored international legal outcomes on Law of the Sea rulings. It destroys the maritime environment by building artificial islands in the offshore estates of other countries. If Turnbull’s forum endorses this approach, it would give a false legitimacy to China’s hollow commitments to international law." - Anthony Bergin, senior fellow at Strategic Analysis Australia - theaustralian.com.au
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
USS Minnesota (SSN 783) advances AUKUS with port visit to HMAS Stirling
AUKUS I&A Strategic Communications - Feb. 25, 2025
1/2
USS Minnesota (SSN 783) arrived in Western Australia on February 25, 2025, kicking off the first of two planned U.S. fast-attack submarine visits to HMAS Stirling in 2025. Port visits support the first pillar of the Australia, United Kingdom, United States trilateral security agreement, known as AUKUS, that is delivering a sovereign conventionally armed, nuclear-powered attack submarine capability to Australia.
“Every time a nuclear-powered submarine ties up in HMAS Stirling, we take a meaningful step closer to establishing Submarine Rotational Force – West and a sovereign conventionally armed, nuclear-powered attack submarine capability for Australia,” said Royal Australian Navy Rear Adm. Tom Phillips, the Australian Submarine Agency’s Head of Submarine Capability. “Each visit is unique with specific goals and objectives designed to ensure we are moving at pace to host the first rotational U.S. attack submarine in late 2027.”
This year, USS Minnesota (SSN 783) is conducting at-sea operations as part of the Submarine Command Course, a training program for naval officers preparing to take command of a submarine. At HMAS Stirling, the U.S. Navy will have the opportunity to share and compare procedures, such as weapons handling, with their Australian counterparts.
"U.S. Navy ships have been visiting Australia for long before I was even in the Navy. Our visit, today, is another step that continues progress towards establishing the Royal Australian Navy's sovereign, conventionally armed, nuclear-powered submarine force," said Cmdr. Jeffrey "J." Cornielle, commanding officer, USS Minnesota (SSN 783). "Those of us who serve aboard these highly capable warships understand the power they bring to the fight."
Announced in March 2023, the AUKUS Pillar I Optimal Pathway lays out the plan for Australia to acquire a sovereign conventionally armed, nuclear-powered submarine fleet beginning in the 2030s. The Optimal Pathway involves three phases. Phase 1 establishes SRF-West in 2027, which will have up to four U.S. and one U.K. attack submarines conducting operations out of HMAS Stirling. This phase builds the infrastructure, expertise, sustainment and stewardship capability required for Australia to operate and maintain a sovereign fleet of conventionally armed, nuclear-powered submarines.
Phase 2 delivers in the early 2030s, when Australia receives its first of three Virginia-class attack submarines purchased from the U.S. Phase 3 delivers both the U.K.’s and Australia’s enduring attack submarine capability, SSN-AUKUS, which will be built in both countries and include technologies from the three partner nations. Australia plans to deliver the first domestically built SSN-AUKUS in the early 2040s.
“AUKUS is a foundational partnership that demonstrates the United States’ confidence in Australia and commitment to allies and partners in the Indo-Pacific region,” said Siriana Nair, the U.S. Consul General in Perth. “These port visits not only advance AUKUS but provide a great opportunity for our sailors to interact with and support the local community, reinforcing the longstanding friendship between the United States and Australia.”
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50963
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22663966 (270820ZFEB25) Notable: Australian Defence Force chief torpedoes Anthony Albanese’s version of events in Chinese live-fire drill - Defence officials have revealed an “unprecedented” joint surveillance operation tracking three Chinese warships off Australia’s coast only reported their live weapons drill an hour and a half after it started, contradicting Anthony Albanese’s version of events. The Chief of the Defence Force, David Johnston, told Senate estimates on Wednesday that a warning from a New Zealand warship that Australia was relying on to track the flotilla was received in Canberra about 11am last Friday - 90 minutes after the exercise began and about an hour after a similar warning was relayed by a commercial pilot. But the Prime Minister insisted later on Wednesday that the New Zealand warning came through “at around the same time” as the Virgin pilot’s notification to Airservices Australia, which had been passed to Defence 50 minutes earlier. The comment, and his claims last week that China had provided notice of the drill “in accordance with practice”, prompted Coalition allegations he was misleading the public. The charge comes ahead of a looming federal election campaign in which the Prime Minister’s leadership and grasp of complex detail will come under intense scrutiny.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50957
>>50960
>>50961
Australian Defence Force chief torpedoes Anthony Albanese’s version of events in Chinese live-fire drill
BEN PACKHAM - 26 February 2025
1/2
Defence officials have revealed an “unprecedented” joint surveillance operation tracking three Chinese warships off Australia’s coast only reported their live weapons drill an hour and a half after it started, contradicting Anthony Albanese’s version of events.
The Chief of the Defence Force, David Johnston, told Senate estimates on Wednesday that a warning from a New Zealand warship that Australia was relying on to track the flotilla was received in Canberra about 11am last Friday – 90 minutes after the exercise began and about an hour after a similar warning was relayed by a commercial pilot.
But the Prime Minister insisted later on Wednesday that the New Zealand warning came through “at around the same time” as the Virgin pilot’s notification to Airservices Australia, which had been passed to Defence 50 minutes earlier.
The comment, and his claims last week that China had provided notice of the drill “in accordance with practice”, prompted Coalition allegations he was misleading the public.
The charge comes ahead of a looming federal election campaign in which the Prime Minister’s leadership and grasp of complex detail will come under intense scrutiny.
Amid growing political furore over the warships’ activities off Australia’s coast, Admiral Johnston also said there was a real prospect that a Chinese nuclear-powered submarine was lurking underneath the task group.
“It is possible,” he said. “Task groups occasionally do deploy with submarines, but not always. I can’t be definitive on whether that’s the case.”
Admiral Johnston said the Chinese had given “inadequate notification” of the “clearly disruptive” live weapons drill, which caused 49 aircraft diversions despite ongoing uncertainty over whether any live weapons were ultimately fired.
Opposition home affairs spokesman James Paterson said the delayed notice meant there was no advance warning of the drill at all.
“It’s not really notification of an upcoming exercise if we only find out about it after it has commenced, is it,” he told Senate estimates.
He added in comments to The Australian that it was “remarkable” that the military operation tracking the vessels had failed to provide an earlier warning and Defence had to learn of the exercise from a civilian aircraft.
“The Prime Minister’s attempt to mislead the public by suggesting there was notice given by the People’s Liberation Army – Navy and it was reported through military channels in a timely way is yet more evidence of his weak leadership,” Senator Paterson said. “He should be honest, admit we were never notified, and call out this malign behaviour instead of making excuses for the PLA-N.”
Former defence official Michael Shoebridge said the government’s handling of the episode had reached “new heights of incompetence”, comparing it unfavourably with Tony Abbott’s Operation Sovereign Borders.
“Can you imagine prime minister Abbott being so unaware of any actual detail about what happened when?” Mr Shoebridge said.
“And can you imagine him accepting advice from the Chief of Defence Force that despite this unprecedented surveillance activity, he was unable to say if live firing actually occurred? And now it’s possible, but he can’t tell you, if a submarine is actually down there too.”
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50964
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22663998 (270831ZFEB25) Notable: COMMENTARY: Australia, we are completely unprepared for China - "The scale of the debacle surrounding China’s live weapons drills in the Tasman Sea was laid bare this week, not by the opposition or the government but by Greens Senator David Shoebridge. “I’m trying to work out how it is with a $55.7bn budget, we find out from a Virgin pilot and a delayed notification from New Zealand,” he told Senate estimates on Wednesday. Shoebridge, despite his political stripe, is well informed on defence matters. His brother, Michael Shoebridge, is a former Defence official and a noted security analyst. His point was well made. For all the billions taxpayers have poured into exquisite military capabilities, the Australian Defence Force only learned about Friday’s live weapons drill second-hand and after the fact. Defence Minister Richard Marles says there has been “unprecedented surveillance” of the three Chinese warships that have lurked off Australia’s coast for more than a fortnight. If that’s the case, why was Australia happy to hive off its some of monitoring of the Chinese warships to New Zealand, which notified Australia of the live fire drill 90 minutes after it began? And why wasn’t an RAAF surveillance aircraft in the area to hear the Chinese radio warning which was picked up by a Virgin pilot and relayed to Defence 40 minutes after the exercise window opened?" - Ben Packham - theaustralian.com.au
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50957
>>50960
>>50961
COMMENTARY: Australia, we are completely unprepared for China
BEN PACKHAM - 27 February 2025
The scale of the debacle surrounding China’s live weapons drills in the Tasman Sea was laid bare this week, not by the opposition or the government but by Greens Senator David Shoebridge.
“I’m trying to work out how it is with a $55.7bn budget, we find out from a Virgin pilot and a delayed notification from New Zealand,” he told Senate estimates on Wednesday.
Shoebridge, despite his political stripe, is well informed on defence matters. His brother, Michael Shoebridge, is a former Defence official and a noted security analyst.
His point was well made. For all the billions taxpayers have poured into exquisite military capabilities, the Australian Defence Force only learned about Friday’s live weapons drill second-hand and after the fact.
Defence Minister Richard Marles says there has been “unprecedented surveillance” of the three Chinese warships that have lurked off Australia’s coast for more than a fortnight.
If that’s the case, why was Australia happy to hive off its some of monitoring of the Chinese warships to New Zealand, which notified Australia of the live fire drill 90 minutes after it began?
And why wasn’t an RAAF surveillance aircraft in the area to hear the Chinese radio warning which was picked up by a Virgin pilot and relayed to Defence 40 minutes after the exercise window opened?
Anthony Albanese’s response to the drill says a lot about his lack of attention to detail and the political strife it gets him in.
He claimed that China provided notice of the drill “in accordance with practice”, when it provided no advance warning at all.
And he wrongly claimed the alert from the New Zealand frigate shadowing the Chinese flotilla was received by Australia “at around the same time” as the Virgin pilot’s notification to Airservices Australia. In fact, the warning came through 50 minutes later.
His looseness on such a serious matter should send shivers down the spines of his colleagues given an election announcement is imminent.
The Coalition has seized on the inconsistencies, accusing Albanese of misleading the public and being “weak” on matters of national security.
Penny Wong was sent in to clean up the mess on Thursday, applying her trademark indignation to accuse the Coalition of politicising the episode.
“What Australians don’t want in the face of these circumstances is reckless political games from people who claim to be leaders,” she said.
But her intervention was as political as those of the opposition, and its forcefulness a reflection of the coming federal poll.
China’s leaders in Beijing must be patting themselves on the back at the merry hell their warships have created while adhering to the letter of international law. This of course was their aim all along.
As Defence Secretary Greg Moriarty told Senate estimates: “The Chinese are signalling. They are practising and rehearsing, and they are collecting (intelligence).”
The presence in the naval task force of one of China’s most formidable vessels, a Renhai cruiser with more than double the firepower of any of Australia’s warships, was designed to send a message to Australia about the nation’s vulnerability.
This is Beijing saying, “We can hit your biggest east coast cities”.
The takeaway for Australia is we are completely unprepared to counter China’s powerful bluewater navy, not to mention its long-range missiles, despite record levels of defence spending.
The navy’s Collins-class submarines are old and unreliable. Its workhorse Anzac frigates are tired and in need of replacement, but the first of nine new general purpose frigates won’t be delivered until the end of the decade.
The botched Hunter-class frigates program won’t produce a ship until the early 2030s, and AUKUS may or may not deliver Australia a nuclear-powered submarine from the early 2030s.
Meanwhile, investments in missile defence have been downgraded and the ADF has virtually no lethal drones.
Defence officials should hang their heads in shame that the ADF is in such a poor state that it couldn’t even keep on top of the activities of three Chinese ships between Australia and New Zealand.
Senior Labor and Coalition figures should join them, having failed to renew the force sufficiently over the course of successive governments.
https://www.theaustralian.com.au/commentary/labor-at-sea-over-chinese-warships-live-fire-drills/news-story/02411f013ae41ff9fccae9288d1dae40
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50965
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22664010 (270836ZFEB25) Notable: Defence minister urges calm over China warships episode as they travel west - Defence Minister Richard Marles has urged Australians to take a "deep breath" over the Chinese warships off Australia's east coast as the Coalition intensifies its attack on the government's response to live-fire drills last week. The opposition has accused Labor of ignoring the strategic implications of the episode because it has repeatedly stressed that the Chinese vessels haven't broken international law. But Mr Marles said that legal principle was critical because so many Australian vessels moving through waters close to China depend on it. "It's really important that we take a deep breath here. Our touchstone has to be international law," he said. "There is actually a greater frequency of Australian naval vessels closer to China than there are Chinese vessels close to Australia." Australian warships have conducted multiple freedom of navigation exercises and participated in United Nations sanctions enforcement near China - including in the Yellow Sea and the contested waters of the South China Sea. While the government hasn't drawn a direct comparison between Australia's actions close to China and the Chinese warships near Australia, Mr Marles said the same principles had to apply to both countries. "We rely heavily on international law to be there and it matters that we are there because that is where our trade routes are," he said. "That's why international law has to be our touchstone."
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50957
>>50960
>>50961
Defence minister urges calm over China warships episode as they travel west
Stephen Dziedzic - 27 February 2025
Defence Minister Richard Marles has urged Australians to take a "deep breath" over the Chinese warships off Australia's east coast as the Coalition intensifies its attack on the government's response to live-fire drills last week.
The opposition has accused Labor of ignoring the strategic implications of the episode because it has repeatedly stressed that the Chinese vessels haven't broken international law.
But Mr Marles said that legal principle was critical because so many Australian vessels moving through waters close to China depend on it.
"It's really important that we take a deep breath here. Our touchstone has to be international law," he said.
"There is actually a greater frequency of Australian naval vessels closer to China than there are Chinese vessels close to Australia."
Australian warships have conducted multiple freedom of navigation exercises and participated in United Nations sanctions enforcement near China — including in the Yellow Sea and the contested waters of the South China Sea.
While the government hasn't drawn a direct comparison between Australia's actions close to China and the Chinese warships near Australia, Mr Marles said the same principles had to apply to both countries.
"We rely heavily on international law to be there and it matters that we are there because that is where our trade routes are," he said.
"That's why international law has to be our touchstone."
Coalition slams response to drills
The Chinese naval task group has now moved past Tasmania and entered the Great Australian Bight. Defence said on Thursday morning that the ships were now about 548 kilometres west of Hobart.
Opposition Leader Peter Dutton slammed the government's response to the Chinese naval actions and has repeatedly accused the prime minister of weakness.
Coalition frontbencher James Paterson said the drills — which forced dozens of commercial flights to change course — exposed the limitations of the government's strategy with Beijing.
"It's certainly exposed a failure of the Albanese government's stabilisation agenda," he said
"Let's remember that the Chinese government is supposed to be our comprehensive strategic partner, this is not how a comprehensive strategic partner, or a stabilised partner, should be treating Australia."
But Foreign Minister Penny Wong said the Coalition had failed to understand the principles behind stabilisation.
"Stabilisation doesn't mean China will not do things with which we do not agree," she said during a Senate estimates hearing.
"China's a great power, its strategic intent has not changed. The only question for those in government or seeking government is how do you deal with that?"
She also accused the Coalition of deploying inflammatory language on the episode, saying it wanted to turn the bilateral relationship with China into an election issue once again.
"The same people who left a massive vacuum in the Pacific, the same people who had no regard for the consequences for Australian exporters or for Chinese communities are at it again, trying to turn China into an election issue," she said.
"The man who once said it was inconceivable that we wouldn't go to war is going to keep beating the drums of war."
ADF learnt of exercise from pilot
Meanwhile, Coalition senators have also grilled the government over why it took so long for the Australian Defence Force to receive a formal notification of the live-fire drills through military channels.
Defence said on Wednesday that it received a warning from a New Zealand ship at about 11am last Friday — about 90 minutes after the exercises began and an hour after a warning was relayed to the government by a commercial pilot.
Shadow Home Affairs Minister James Paterson said it appeared there had been a "breakdown" in communication.
"If our Chinese friends didn't tell us [about the drills] we should have used our own intelligence and defence assets to get on top of this issue, and it is of great concern to me that we didn't," he said.
But Mr Marles suggested the ADF would have received a notification much more quickly if the military was facing a "real" threat.
"To equate what is going on with the observation of a Chinese exercise … with a real threat, is not fair in terms of what is going on right now versus this is the kind of response that we would have if there was a real, live threat," he said.
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-02-27/defence-minister-china-warships-call-for-calm/104989968
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50966
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22664015 (270853ZFEB25) Notable: The Virginia-class fast-attack USS Minnesota is moored at HMAS Stirling in Western Australia - The world’s most advanced nuclear-powered submarine is currently moored in Western Australia as part of training exercise between the US navy and its Australian counterparts. The Virginia-class fast-attack submarine USS Minnesota is visiting HMAS Stirling naval base to strengthen relations with Royal Australian Navy officers. It is the first of two planned US fast-attack submarine visits to the naval base this year. The submarine is supporting the US 7th Fleet, the largest deployed fleet from the States, operating with allies to maintain a free and open Indo-Pacific. Crew from USS Minnesota will conduct at-sea operations as part of the Submarine Command Course with naval officers preparing to take command of a submarine at HMAS Stirling. Australia plans to acquire a fleet of armed nuclear powered submarines in the 2030s as part of AUKUS. The deal will see up to four US and one UK attack submarines conduct operations from HMAS Stirling, before Australia receives its first Virginia-class attack submarines next decade. USS Minnesota is the fourth US submarine to visit HMAS Stirling as part of AUKUS., MISSING MEDIA/FILES: US_Navy_Commander_Jeffrey_Corneille_on_the_Virginia_class_fast_attack_submarine_USS_Minnesota_moored_at_HMAS_Stirling.jpg
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50962
The Virginia-class fast-attack USS Minnesota is moored at HMAS Stirling in Western Australia
The US navy Virginia-class fast-attack submarine USS Minnesota is moored at HMAS Stirling in WA kicking off the first of two fast-attack submarine visits this year.
Emma Kirk - February 26, 2025
1/2
The world’s most advanced nuclear-powered submarine is currently moored in Western Australia as part of training exercise between the US navy and its Australian counterparts.
The Virginia-class fast-attack submarine USS Minnesota is visiting HMAS Stirling naval base to strengthen relations with Royal Australian Navy officers.
It is the first of two planned US fast-attack submarine visits to the naval base this year.
The submarine is supporting the US 7th Fleet, the largest deployed fleet from the States, operating with allies to maintain a free and open Indo-Pacific.
Crew from USS Minnesota will conduct at-sea operations as part of the Submarine Command Course with naval officers preparing to take command of a submarine at HMAS Stirling.
Australia plans to acquire a fleet of armed nuclear powered submarines in the 2030s as part of AUKUS.
The deal will see up to four US and one UK attack submarines conduct operations from HMAS Stirling, before Australia receives its first Virginia-class attack submarines next decade.
USS Minnesota is the fourth US submarine to visit HMAS Stirling as part of AUKUS.
Royal Australian Navy Officer Ken Burleigh said the visits were helping Australia build its capability to support nuclear submarines through maintenance and infrastructure.
The naval officer said nuclear-powered submarines offered flexibility that could re-roll missions to go from one task to another swiftly.
“The fact that you’ve got a nuclear power reactor in there gets you places quickly and quietly, these are the apex predators of the oceans … they’re called that for a reason.”
US Navy Commander Jeffrey Cornielle said HMAS Stirling was the port visit every sailor dreamt of and they were enjoying the liberty of Perth and Fremantle.
The commander said they were in WA to increase relations with their Australian counterparts and would be supporting the naval base while they were stationed there.
He would not say how long it took his crew to travel to WA, but a typical operation would see them beneath the surface between 60 and 90 days at any one time.
Nuclear-powered submarines can stay underwater indefinitely, but were limited by the amount of food and supplies they could carry.
The fast-attack submarine holds a crew of about 140 people that work in shifts around the clock to monitor what happens in the oceans.
The vessel can carry up to 23 torpedoes which the crew are trained to load and shoot quickly at any moment.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50967
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22664021 (270909ZFEB25) Notable: Video: USS Minnesota Commander reaffirms bond between Aussie and US submariners during visit to HMAS Stirling - While the election of Donald Trump has made the future of AUKUS uncertain, the bond between Australian and US Navy personnel remains strong after the USS Minnesota arrived at HMAS Stirling this week. The Virginia class submarine is in Australia for a routine port visit, the first of several planned US submarine visits to the country in 2025. Commander Jeffrey “J.” Cornielle, commanding officer of the USS Minnesota said the submarine bond between US and Australian sailors is “one that’s not easy to explain”. “But it’s tighter than most of you would ever think of,” he said. “Some of your officers have been in our training courses, so we’re reunited, and being introduced to others. We’re really excited to meet some of your crews here and my crews are really excited to tour some of your boats.” He said that his crew of 140 were thrilled to be at HMAS Stirling calling it a “dream port”. “This is the port visit that every sailor dreams of and it’s our first one, so it works out well,” he said. “We will be increasing our relations with our submarine brothers and sisters here in Australia. The importance of strengthening that (AUKUS) group… between us and any of our other allied nations… is that we operate together in an ocean that we fight to ensure is free and open to the world.”
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50962
>>50966
USS Minnesota Commander reaffirms bond between Aussie and US submariners during visit to HMAS Stirling
Rachel Fenner - 26 February 2025
While the election of Donald Trump has made the future of AUKUS uncertain, the bond between Australian and US Navy personnel remains strong after the USS Minnesota arrived at HMAS Stirling this week.
The Virginia class submarine is in Australia for a routine port visit, the first of several planned US submarine visits to the country in 2025.
Commander Jeffrey “J.” Cornielle, commanding officer of the USS Minnesota said the submarine bond between US and Australian sailors is “one that’s not easy to explain”.
“But it’s tighter than most of you would ever think of,” he said.
“Some of your officers have been in our training courses, so we’re reunited, and being introduced to others.
“We’re really excited to meet some of your crews here and my crews are really excited to tour some of your boats.”
He said that his crew of 140 were thrilled to be at HMAS Stirling calling it a “dream port”.
“This is the port visit that every sailor dreams of and it’s our first one, so it works out well,” he said.
“We will be increasing our relations with our submarine brothers and sisters here in Australia.
“The importance of strengthening that (AUKUS) group… between us and any of our other allied nations… is that we operate together in an ocean that we fight to ensure is free and open to the world.”
When asked if the US Navy still had Australia’s back Cdr. Cornielle answered: “We are partners and we have each other’s back.”
While in the west, members of the submarine’s crew will take part in a US submarine command course, a training program for naval officers preparing to take command of a submarine.
The next port visit to HMAS Stirling later this year will be a three-week submarine maintenance period.
Commodore Glen Wells from the Australian Submarine Agency said he was aware of the Chinese ships off the coast of Australia but deferred to the comments made by Anthony Albanese.
“These visits that you see here are helping us progress our capabilities to supporting nuclear submarines in Australia,” he said.
“We’re creating a capability for maintenance and using it to inform our infrastructure we need.”
Chief of the Royal Australian Navy Vice Admiral Mark Hammond said he was proud to welcome Minnesota to Australia.
“The Australian and US Navies operate on shared behaviours, shared values, and a shared commitment to assuring the prosperity and security of the Indo-Pacific region,” Vice Admiral Hammond said.
“This port visit follows the recent submarine tendered maintenance period at HMAS Stirling, which was the first time Australians directly participated in the maintenance of a US nuclear-powered submarine in Australia.”
https://thewest.com.au/politics/defence/uss-minnesota-commander-reaffirms-bond-between-aussie-and-us-submariners-during-visit-to-hmas-stirling-c-17859384
https://www.9news.com.au/national/us-submarine-docks-western-australia-aukus/fdc5cba4-7d68-4c2a-be2e-82b3f3a679a3
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50968
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22676351 (282237ZFEB25) Notable: Video: Asked about AUKUS, Trump replies: ‘What does that mean?’ - Donald Trump appeared to be unaware of Australia’s new military pact with the United States and Britain during a meeting with UK Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer at the White House. The US president was asked directly by a British reporter in the Oval Office at the start of the meeting: “Will you be discussing AUKUS with the prime minister?” Trump replied: “What does that mean?” The reporter then explained it was the Australia-US-British defence technology alliance, to which Trump said: “Well, we’ll be discussing that. We have another great relationship. And you have, too. With Australia. Yeah, we’ve had a very good relationship with Australia.” Under the AUKUS agreement, Australia has committed to paying the United States $US3 billion ($4.8 billion) to enhance the US submarine industry’s capacity. In return, Washington will sell Australia several Virginia-class nuclear-powered submarines, expected to be delivered in the early 2030s. Additionally, Britain and Australia will collaborate on the development of a new AUKUS-class submarine in the years to come. Speaking to reporters in Sydney on Friday, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said Trump’s AUKUS slip was not a concern. “There’s a lot of acronyms in this business and we all get thrown at them from time to time,” he said.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>>/qresearch/22544378 (pb)
>>50962
Asked about AUKUS, Trump replies: ‘What does that mean?’
Rob Harris - February 28, 2025
1/2
Donald Trump appeared to be unaware of Australia’s new military pact with the United States and Britain during a meeting with UK Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer at the White House.
The US president was asked directly by a British reporter in the Oval Office at the start of the meeting: “Will you be discussing AUKUS with the prime minister?”
Trump replied: “What does that mean?”
The reporter then explained it was the Australia-US-British defence technology alliance, to which Trump said: “Well, we’ll be discussing that. We have another great relationship. And you have, too. With Australia. Yeah, we’ve had a very good relationship with Australia.”
Under the AUKUS agreement, Australia has committed to paying the United States $US3 billion ($4.8 billion) to enhance the US submarine industry’s capacity. In return, Washington will sell Australia several Virginia-class nuclear-powered submarines, expected to be delivered in the early 2030s. Additionally, Britain and Australia will collaborate on the development of a new AUKUS-class submarine in the years to come.
Speaking to reporters in Sydney on Friday, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said Trump’s AUKUS slip was not a concern.
“There’s a lot of acronyms in this business and we all get thrown at them from time to time,” he said.
“Donald Trump went on ... [to say] he wanted to speak about the really important and positive relationship with Australia. That is consistent with the discussions that I’ve had with President Trump that included, of course, talking about AUKUS which we spoke about during our discussions.”
US Secretary of Defence Pete Hegseth said earlier this month that Trump was “very aware” and supportive of the nuclear submarine deal, after Australia confirmed its first $800 million payment.
The AUKUS pact, and the amount of money Australia has pledged to spend, has been a target of fierce criticism from former prime ministers Malcolm Turnbull and Paul Keating.
Keating said last year that Australia risked becoming the “51st state of the United States” under the agreement, which sent the wrong message to China.
Turnbull, the broker of a previous deal with France that was controversially scrapped, said the deal abandoned Australia’s sovereignty in terms of submarines, and would be “completely dependent on what happens in the United States as to whether we get them now”.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50969
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22676415 (282247ZFEB25) Notable: Video: Donald Trump's 'what does that mean?' AUKUS remark played down as verbal slip-up - Donald Trump's apparent unfamiliarity with the term AUKUS, a key defence deal between Australia, the United Kingdom, and United States, was played down by the Australian government as a likely mix-up with acronyms. During a press conference at the Oval Office on Thursday, the US president was asked whether he intended to discuss the AUKUS alliance in his meeting with visiting British Prime Minister Keir Starmer. "What does that mean?" Mr Trump responded, seemingly puzzled by the reference. "AUKUS - the Australia-US defence alliance," the reporter explained. Mr Trump responded: "Well, we will be discussing that. We've had another great relationship, and you have too, with Australia. We've had a very good relationship with Australia." Australian politicians appeared unperturbed by Mr Trump's AUKUS remark. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said there were "a lot of acronyms in this business and we all get thrown at them from time to time". "I've seen President Trump's comments. Together with Keir Starmer, he went on to speak about the really important and positive relationship with Australia," he told reporters in Sydney on Friday. "Not everyone gets the acronyms and all the rest of it, but there's no doubt in my mind the president strongly supports the alliance between our three countries and strongly supports AUKUS," he told the Today show. "He's stated that previously." Cabinet minister Murray Watt said Labor was "very confident" in AUKUS's security and that it was not prudent to overreact to a sentiment from "a president with a very full plate".
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50962
>>50968
Donald Trump's 'what does that mean?' AUKUS remark played down as verbal slip-up
Heloise Vyas - 28 February 2025
Donald Trump's apparent unfamiliarity with the term AUKUS, a key defence deal between Australia, the United Kingdom, and United States, was played down by the Australian government as a likely mix-up with acronyms.
During a press conference at the Oval Office on Thursday, the US president was asked whether he intended to discuss the AUKUS alliance in his meeting with visiting British Prime Minister Keir Starmer.
"What does that mean?" Mr Trump responded, seemingly puzzled by the reference.
"AUKUS — the Australia-US defence alliance," the reporter explained.
Mr Trump responded: "Well, we will be discussing that. We've had another great relationship, and you have too, with Australia. We've had a very good relationship with Australia."
AUKUS is a trilateral security pact that aims to equip Australia with three US-built nuclear submarines by the 2030s, in exchange for about $4.78 billion in payouts from Canberra to Washington.
It also entails the development of a new submarine, the SSN-AUKUS, on Australian and British shores beginning 2030.
That's the first pillar of the agreement. The second pillar involves creating a platform for advanced technology cooperation between the three countries, including the sharing of quantum computing, artificial intelligence and hypersonic weapons.
Progress on the project has been slow and is expected to be marred by further setbacks. The Trump administration, which is yet to officially state its position on the agreement, will be crucial in shepherding it.
Earlier this month US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth met with Australian Defence Minister Richard Marles in Washington DC and said Mr Trump was "supportive" of the AUKUS alliance, but the president has not attested to this view.
Albanese brushes aside Trump's AUKUS slip-up
Australian politicians appeared unperturbed by Mr Trump's AUKUS remark.
Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said there were "a lot of acronyms in this business and we all get thrown at them from time to time".
"I've seen President Trump's comments. Together with Keir Starmer, he went on to speak about the really important and positive relationship with Australia," he told reporters in Sydney on Friday.
"That's consistent with the discussions that I've had with President Trump, that included, of course, talking about AUKUS, which we spoke about during both of our discussions."
Opposition Leader Peter Dutton said he did not hold concerns for the future of the deal.
"Not everyone gets the acronyms and all the rest of it, but there's no doubt in my mind the president strongly supports the alliance between our three countries and strongly supports AUKUS," he told the Today show.
"He's stated that previously."
Cabinet minister Murray Watt said Labor was "very confident" in AUKUS's security and that it was not prudent to overreact to a sentiment from "a president with a very full plate".
UK 'all in' on Ukraine aid, Starmer tells Trump
Ukraine peace talks dominated Mr Trump and Mr Starmer's Thursday meeting, the first between the two leaders since the new US administration took effect last month.
Mr Starmer, who was described as a "tough negotiator" by Mr Trump, said London was ready to deploy troops in support of a Ukraine peace deal.
"Europe must step up. The UK is all in," he said, warning that any agreement must "stop [Vladimir] Putin coming back for more".
Mr Trump said a critical minerals deal, close to being finalised between the US and Ukraine, was the only security guarantee Kyiv needed against Russia, dismissing Mr Starmer's plea for a commitment of American military support.
Transatlantic frictions over US-Russia talks and Mr Trump's reciprocal tariff threats are among the underlying differences that remain between the two allies.
Mr Starmer has signalled that Britain will increase defence spending and tried to reassure the US president that Europe will provide support and security guarantees to Kyiv if peace talks with Russia are successful.
Mr Trump said he was confident Russian President Vladimir Putin would not press to restart the war in the future.
"I think he'll keep his word," he said of Mr Putin. "I've spoken to him, I've known him for a long time now."
Also on Thursday Mr Trump reaffirmed the US' long commitments to the mutual defence of NATO nations even if European peacekeepers end up in Ukraine, saying "I support it. I don't think we're going to have any reason for it".
Mr Starmer also delivered an invitation from King Charles for a second state visit, which Mr Trump accepted.
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-02-28/uk-pm-meets-trump-at-white-house/104993110
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50970
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22676428 (282249ZFEB25) Notable: Donald Trump’s AUKUS embarrassment shows insignificance of deal to the US President - "Donald Trump’s failure to recognise the term “AUKUS” was an embarrassment which tells us a few home truths about where this deal - which is central to Australia’s defence planning - ranks in the president’s head. Trump’s amnesia might have briefly caused hearts to skip in Canberra, but it also won’t matter because in the end Trump is still likely to strongly support the nuclear submarine deal. Why? Because AUKUS is a very Trumpian deal. Australia pumps an astonishing $US3bn into US submarine production with an expectation - which Trump will never have to honour because it will be beyond his term – that the US eventually sells us three Virginia-class submarines. Why wouldn’t a transactionally minded American president like that sort of lopsided deal? Yet Trump’s inability to recognise the acronym AUKUS when asked about it in the Oval Office does tell us something about the different weight given to the importance of AUKUS in the US compared to Australia. It is the president who succeeds Trump who will have to make the hard decisions on AUKUS and this is where the issue becomes murky for Australia. At that point the then-US president will have the power to halt the planned sale of Virginia-class submarines to Australia from 2032 if it is judged that the loss of those submarines from the US fleet will undermine the fighting capabilities of the US military." - Cameron Stewart - theaustralian.com.au
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50962
>>50968
>>50969
Donald Trump’s AUKUS embarrassment shows insignificance of deal to the US President
CAMERON STEWART - 28 February 2025
Donald Trump’s failure to recognise the term “AUKUS” was an embarrassment which tells us a few home truths about where this deal - which is central to Australia’s defence planning - ranks in the president’s head.
Trump’s amnesia might have briefly caused hearts to skip in Canberra, but it also won’t matter because in the end Trump is still likely to strongly support the nuclear submarine deal.
Why? Because AUKUS is a very Trumpian deal. Australia pumps an astonishing $US3bn into US submarine production with an expectation – which Trump will never have to honour because it will be beyond his term – that the US eventually sells us three Virginia-class submarines.
Why wouldn’t a transactionally minded American president like that sort of lopsided deal? Yet Trump’s inability to recognise the acronym AUKUS when asked about it in the Oval Office does tell us something about the different weight given to the importance of AUKUS in the US compared to Australia.
Yes, as Anthony Albanese and Peter Dutton said, it is easy to trip over acronyms, and yes we shouldn’t read too much into it. But let’s be frank, any previous president would have done the basic preparation to understand the term AUKUS prior to meeting with British leader and AUKUS partner Keir Starmer. The fact that Trump didn’t even know the term suggests he has barely spent any time thinking about it or talking about it with his advisers.
That’s not great news for Australia. Yet that also will make no difference to whether or not Trump ultimately supports the deal. US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth says that Trump is fully aware of AUKUS and fully supportive of it, while Secretary of State and China hawk Marco Rubio has said AUKUS is “almost a blueprint’’ for how allied nations can work together to confront security challenges.
The Americans will almost certainly love AUKUS during Trump’s four-year term because they don’t need to make any hard decisions in relation to it. Until the end of this decade they just have to accept pots of money from Australia, which last month handed over a cheque for $800m as the first instalment of the eventual $US3bn to speed up the production of the Virginia-class submarines.
It is the president who succeeds Trump who will have to make the hard decisions on AUKUS and this is where the issue becomes murky for Australia. At that point the then-US president will have the power to halt the planned sale of Virginia-class submarines to Australia from 2032 if it is judged that the loss of those submarines from the US fleet will undermine the fighting capabilities of the US military.
Given that the production of Virginia-class submarines is currently way behind schedule and unlikely to catch up by the 2030s when the sale to Australia is supposed to take place, it would be an easy argument for a president – backed by a hawkish congress – to make. That is when the going gets tough for AUKUS and for Australia. But not for Trump, who just has to kick back in the Oval Office and watch Australian taxpayers pour a small fortune into the US shipbuilding industry. Given that, why wouldn’t he support AUKUS, or whatever it’s called?
https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/defence/donald-trump-will-come-to-love-aukus-even-if-he-cant-remember-its-name/news-story/96e43f9a0e5be2ebbabbd175f2df373c
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50971
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22677739 (010200ZMAR25) Notable: China tells Australia to expect more warship visits but insists its navy poses 'no threat' - The Chinese ambassador has signalled Beijing will conduct further naval deployments close to Australia, saying it's "normal" for a major power to send naval assets across the world. In his first comments since this month's arrival of a People's Liberation Army-Navy (PLA-N) taskforce, Ambassador Xiao Qian declared there was no reason for China to "pose a threat to Australia" as both countries remain "strategic partners". Ambassador Xiao has also insisted the PLA-N does not need to apologise for last week's live-fire exercise in the Tasman Sea which disrupted dozens of commercial flights, saying international law does not specify how much advanced warning is needed. "I don't see there's any reason why the Chinese side should feel sorry about that, or even to think about to apologise for that," the ambassador told the ABC in an interview while visiting Hobart. "The vessels conducted drills in a way that is in compliance with international law and international practice. They did make prior notification to the public in a way that is in accordance with international practices. "Different countries have a different practice and based on the nature of the drill, size of the drill, and the scope of the drill - my view is that the Chinese naval certification advice was appropriate". The ambassador declined to say whether the deployment of the "pretty disciplined" PLA-N taskforce was designed to send a message to Australia to stop conducting freedom of navigation exercises in the South China Sea.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50957
>>50960
>>50961
China tells Australia to expect more warship visits but insists its navy poses 'no threat'
Jano Gibson and Andrew Greene - 28 February 2025
The Chinese ambassador has signalled Beijing will conduct further naval deployments close to Australia, saying it's "normal" for a major power to send naval assets across the world.
In his first comments since this month's arrival of a People's Liberation Army-Navy (PLA-N) taskforce, Ambassador Xiao Qian declared there was no reason for China to "pose a threat to Australia" as both countries remain "strategic partners".
Ambassador Xiao has also insisted the PLA-N does not need to apologise for last week's live-fire exercise in the Tasman Sea which disrupted dozens of commercial flights, saying international law does not specify how much advanced warning is needed.
"I don't see there's any reason why the Chinese side should feel sorry about that, or even to think about to apologise for that," the ambassador told the ABC in an interview while visiting Hobart.
"The vessels conducted drills in a way that is in compliance with international law and international practice. They did make prior notification to the public in a way that is in accordance with international practices.
"Different countries have a different practice and based on the nature of the drill, size of the drill, and the scope of the drill — my view is that the Chinese naval certification advice was appropriate".
The ambassador declined to say whether the deployment of the "pretty disciplined" PLA-N taskforce was designed to send a message to Australia to stop conducting freedom of navigation exercises in the South China Sea.
"I think our naval vessels (are) present in this part of the world, just like they're present in many other parts of the world."
"They are part of the efforts to train, to practice and to rehearsal, and that is a normal kind of practice for many navies in the world, and there should be no overreading into this".
Asked whether the arrival of the three warships was designed to occur just before Australia's federal election, the Ambassador insisted Beijing did "not interfere" with foreign democratic processes.
"As a major power in this region, as a country that has so many things to look after, it is normal for China to send their vessels to different parts of the region to conduct various kinds of activities," Ambassador Xiao said.
On Thursday, Defence Minister Richard Marles urged Australians to take a "deep breath" over the PLA-N task group which is currently being tracked heading west along the southern coastline.
This week in Senate estimates Australia's Defence Secretary Greg Moriarty said he expected more frequent visits by Chinese warships to the region in future years, as Beijing consolidates its naval power.
"It's claiming certainly regional and global interests as a maritime power, and I expect that they will wish to continue to be present in an increasing number of international waterways in the years ahead," Mr Moriarty told Parliament.
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-02-28/chinese-ambassador-says-china-poses-no-threat-to-australia/104992530
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=US8bLsX5uak
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50972
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22677763 (010204ZMAR25) Notable: PLA warships’ drills completely different with Australian military aircraft’s intrusion into China’s airspace: Chinese Ambassador - "The drills conducted by the Chinese fleet have been safe, professional, and in accordance with relevant international law and established practices, and they are completely different with the Australian military aircraft's intrusion into China's airspace, which is a serious violation of international law and undermines China's national security, said Chinese Ambassador to Australia Xiao Qian in an interview with the Australian Broadcasting Corporation in Hobart, the capital of Tasmania on Thursday. Xiao made the remarks in response to the inquiry that the Australian side views the Chinese live-fire drills without prior notice as irresponsible and unprofessional, and whether the presence of the Chinese fleet in the waters around Australia was intended to signal Australia to cease similar activities in the South China Sea, as well as whether this action was related to the Australian federal election. Xiao stressed that during recent couple of days, China and Australia have maintained close communication through diplomatic channels in Beijing, Canberra and other multilateral occasions. Spokespersons from the Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs and the Ministry of National Defense have also made statements on this matter. China's position is very clear. The People's Liberation Army is strictly disciplined and consistently abides by international law and basic norms of international relations, Xiao said." - Global Times - globaltimes.cn
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50957
>>50960
>>50971
PLA warships’ drills completely different with Australian military aircraft’s intrusion into China’s airspace: Chinese Ambassador
Global Times - Feb 28, 2025
The drills conducted by the Chinese fleet have been safe, professional, and in accordance with relevant international law and established practices, and they are completely different with the Australian military aircraft's intrusion into China's airspace, which is a serious violation of international law and undermines China's national security, said Chinese Ambassador to Australia Xiao Qian in an interview with the Australian Broadcasting Corporation in Hobart, the capital of Tasmania on Thursday.
Xiao made the remarks in response to the inquiry that the Australian side views the Chinese live-fire drills without prior notice as irresponsible and unprofessional, and whether the presence of the Chinese fleet in the waters around Australia was intended to signal Australia to cease similar activities in the South China Sea, as well as whether this action was related to the Australian federal election.
Xiao stressed that during recent couple of days, China and Australia have maintained close communication through diplomatic channels in Beijing, Canberra and other multilateral occasions. Spokespersons from the Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs and the Ministry of National Defense have also made statements on this matter. China's position is very clear.
The People's Liberation Army is strictly disciplined and consistently abides by international law and basic norms of international relations, Xiao said.
China conducted live-fire drills towards sea after repeatedly issuing safety notices in advance, said the Chinese ambassador. China's actions are entirely in line with international law and common international practices and will not affect aviation safety.
In fact, international law does not specify this issue and countries have different practices. "In my personal opinion, how long in advance should the notice be made depends on the nature, scale, and scope of the live-fire drills. China's current practice is entirely appropriate," Xiao said.
Xiao said that some Australian medias have linked the Chinese live-fire drills in the region with the activities taken by Australian military aircraft over China's Xisha Qundao, which are completely different in nature. The Australian military aircraft intruded into China's airspace, which is a serious violation of international law and undermines China's national security. However, the Chinese naval exercise took place in high seas far from Australia's coastline and aligns with international law.
China and Australia are comprehensive strategic partners. The term "partner" indicates that the two countries are friends, not foes or rivals. China has always regarded Australia as an important partner, and there is no need for Australia to feel concerned about the actions of the Chinese fleet, Xiao said.
He also noted that China has always adhered to the principle of non-interference in other countries' internal affairs, and this is also a tradition of Chinese diplomacy. The Australian federal election is an internal matter of Australia, China does not comment on, intervene in, or interfere with it.
The presence of the Chinese naval fleet in the international waters around Australia is entirely unrelated to the Australian federal election. China hopes that the Australian side will view this matter objectively and rationally, refrain from misjudging and overreacting, Xiao said.
https://www.globaltimes.cn/page/202502/1329234.shtml
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50973
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22677838 (010212ZMAR25) Notable: Former PM Morrison says Aussies should be ‘troubled’ by Albo’s response to Chinese gunboat diplomacy - Former Prime Minister Scott Morrison has condemned what he claims is a “hesitant and passive” response by Anthony Albanese to “bullying” from Chinese warships off the Australian coast, declaring the country must be “resolute” in its dealings with Beijing. Mr Morrison, whose criticisms of the Chinese government during his prime ministership resulted in Australia being hit with punishing tariffs on wine, barley and other goods, said US President Donald Trump’s administration would have also noticed Australia’s weak reaction to Chinese provocation. “We are in an alliance with the US and it has put us in a special category, one where you cannot sit on the fence,” Mr Morrison said. Mr Morrison said Anthony Albanese’s “hesitation and passivity” in response to the “bullying behaviour of the Chinese” would give Australians “every right to be troubled.” “Not making excuses for them (the Chinese) would be a pretty good start,” he said, referring to Mr Albanese initially playing down the seriousness of the incident. Mr Morrison said his response would have been tougher, sending the Australian navy to closely monitor the three Chinese warships rather than leaving the task to one lone New Zealand ship. “You would have been sweating on every brief, as you awaited updates on what the PLA-N was up to,” he said. “This was not business as usual. It is not unreasonable to expect the Prime Minister to have been acquainted with every detail of this event.”
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50957
>>50960
>>50961
Former PM Morrison says Aussies should be ‘troubled’ by Albo’s response to Chinese gunboat diplomacy
Former Prime Minister Scott Morrison has condemned PM Anthony Albanese’s response to bullying by Chinese warships off the Australian coast.
Matthews Benns and Angira Bharadwaj - February 28, 2025
1/2
Former Prime Minister Scott Morrison has condemned what he claims is a “hesitant and passive” response by Anthony Albanese to “bullying” from Chinese warships off the Australian coast, declaring the country must be “resolute” in its dealings with Beijing.
Mr Morrison, whose criticisms of the Chinese government during his prime ministership resulted in Australia being hit with punishing tariffs on wine, barley and other goods, said US President Donald Trump’s administration would have also noticed Australia’s weak reaction to Chinese provocation.
“We are in an alliance with the US and it has put us in a special category, one where you cannot sit on the fence,” Mr Morrison said.
Three Chinese warships have spent the past two weeks prowling off the coast, and conducting live fire exercises without the usual 24 to 48-hour warning period.
Thirty minutes after the live fire began a Virgin Airlines pilot picked up a low-frequency radio warning as the ships came into view in the middle of the Tasman and raised the alarm.
Airservices Australia CEO Rob Sharp told Senate estimates almost 50 commercial flights were diverted last Friday following the warning, with the warships live firing 300 nautical miles off the east coast.
Mr Albanese said on Friday that China’s actions were “within” international law, but his government had “protested and made our position clear that more notice should have been given.”
“This is basically about the Chinese showing their force and showing they can go where they want to go when they want to go. They keep doing this until someone says no,” Mr Morrison told The Saturday Telegraph.
“Australia, as always, has to be resolute in its responses to these things.”
Mr Morrison said Anthony Albanese’s “hesitation and passivity” in response to the “bullying behaviour of the Chinese” would give Australians “every right to be troubled.”
“Not making excuses for them (the Chinese) would be a pretty good start,” he said, referring to Mr Albanese initially playing down the seriousness of the incident.
Mr Morrison said his response would have been tougher, sending the Australian navy to closely monitor the three Chinese warships rather than leaving the task to one lone New Zealand ship.
“You would have been sweating on every brief, as you awaited updates on what the PLA-N was up to,” he said.
“This was not business as usual. It is not unreasonable to expect the Prime Minister to have been acquainted with every detail of this event.”
During his time in office Mr Morrison took a tough line with China, calling the Asian superpower out on the origins of Covid, which resulted in Beijing slapping Australia with harsh economic tariffs.
The retribution cut Australian wine sales to China from $1.24 billion in 2019 to less than $1 million in 2023.
Domestic barley, lobster, cotton beef and lamb industries were also rocked, forcing producers to find other export markets.
When Labor won power it moved to get the trade relationship with China back on track, but Mr Morrison claimed Xi Jinping’s government didn’t need to be rewarded for removing the tariffs.
“As for dropping illegal trade sanctions used to try and coerce Australia, you don’t thank someone for stopping punching you in the face,” he said.
“The government’s approach to China changed after the election, but in so doing if they thought they were going to get a different China, they were misinformed.
Mr Morrison said China “has been on a charm offensive towards the Albanese government”, which he claims was a result of “the complete failure of their bullying tactics of coercion and wolf warrior diplomacy” on his own administration.
“Yet this has not stopped the Chinese government from pushing the envelope with their old playbook of gunboat diplomacy.
“China wants to completely dominate the Indo-Pacific. They want to dominate the region. That does not change however many photos you have taken with them or however many nice moments you share in Beijing.”
He said the Trump administration would have noticed the weak response but had not offered any criticism because of the “strong respect for Australia” stemming from the AUKUS nuclear submarine deal.
“I don’t think they would be saying anything publicly, I think they will continue to show respect for the relationship and continue to extend their professional courtesy,” he said.
“The US would want us to stand up to China because we understand it is in our own best interests, that’s what good allies are expected to do.”
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50974
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22677965 (010231ZMAR25) Notable: How Julian Assange’s brother and a crypto artist raised $74m to free him - Gabriel Shipton didn’t know his older sibling at all when he was growing up. In fact, he didn’t even know Julian Assange existed until he received an email in his last year of high school saying: “this is your long-lost brother”. “I thought it was a joke,” says Shipton, a rangy, academic-looking 42-year-old film producer. “So I sent an email back saying, ‘Oh bullshit’. And he sent one back saying, ‘Ask your dad’.” So he did, and John Shipton readily came clean about the relationship he’d had with a woman when they were in their early 20s, and the child it produced. Soon after that, the siblings - Assange in Melbourne, Shipton in Sydney – connected in real life. A couple of months after Assange’s arrest, Shipton, their father and investigative journalist John Pilger visited him in Belmarsh prison. And what they saw shocked them. “I’d been visiting him in the embassy over the years, and he always had it together, even though there was intense pressure on him,” Shipton says. “I’d never seen him in a state like that. He was very distressed, and I left Belmarsh that day thinking, ‘Oh shit, I’ve got to do everything I can, otherwise Julian might lose his life’.” From that moment came two major pieces of work that ultimately helped pave the way for Assange’s release in June 2024: the documentary Ithaka, released in November 2021, and a collaboration between Shipton and the digital artist Pak that ultimately raised $US55 million ($74 million in February 2022) towards the legal campaign to free Assange. Pak is a suitably shadowy figure whose identity is unknown. A digital creator, cryptocurrency investor and programmer, they are perhaps the ideal collaborator on a project designed to aid the creator of WikiLeaks. But while Shipton will discuss the Censored program at the Australian International Documentary Conference this weekend, don’t expect any insights into Pak. “I never met him,” he says. “Actually, I don’t even know if it’s a him; I assumed it was a him, just from our conversations, but I never met him. Them.”
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>>/qresearch/22371251 (pb)
How Julian Assange’s brother and a crypto artist raised $74m to free him
Karl Quinn - February 28, 2025
1/2
Gabriel Shipton didn’t know his older sibling at all when he was growing up. In fact, he didn’t even know Julian Assange existed until he received an email in his last year of high school saying: “this is your long-lost brother”.
“I thought it was a joke,” says Shipton, a rangy, academic-looking 42-year-old film producer. “So I sent an email back saying, ‘Oh bullshit’. And he sent one back saying, ‘Ask your dad’.”
So he did, and John Shipton readily came clean about the relationship he’d had with a woman when they were in their early 20s, and the child it produced. Soon after that, the siblings – Assange in Melbourne, Shipton in Sydney – connected in real life.
“He would come and visit, stay with me when I was living in sharehouses and things like that,” Shipton says. “We were immediately pretty close. I didn’t have any other siblings, so it was a nice surprise to find out I’ve got an older brother.”
The bond between them took on another dimension when Assange was arrested in 2019, after the Ecuadorean embassy in London revoked the asylum it had extended to him since 2012.
A couple of months after Assange’s arrest, Shipton, their father and investigative journalist John Pilger visited him in Belmarsh prison. And what they saw shocked them.
“I’d been visiting him in the embassy over the years, and he always had it together, even though there was intense pressure on him,” Shipton says. “I’d never seen him in a state like that. He was very distressed, and I left Belmarsh that day thinking, ‘Oh shit, I’ve got to do everything I can, otherwise Julian might lose his life’.”
From that moment came two major pieces of work that ultimately helped pave the way for Assange’s release in June 2024: the documentary Ithaka, released in November 2021, and a collaboration between Shipton and the digital artist Pak that ultimately raised $US55 million ($74 million in February 2022) towards the legal campaign to free Assange.
Pak is a suitably shadowy figure whose identity is unknown. A digital creator, cryptocurrency investor and programmer, they are perhaps the ideal collaborator on a project designed to aid the creator of WikiLeaks.
But while Shipton will discuss the Censored program at the Australian International Documentary Conference this weekend, don’t expect any insights into Pak.
“I never met him,” he says. “Actually, I don’t even know if it’s a him; I assumed it was a him, just from our conversations, but I never met him. Them.”
Shipton became intrigued by the potential of NFTs as a fundraising tool in 2021, soon after they emerged as an outgrowth of the blockchain technology behind cryptocurrency.
A non-fungible token is a unique digital identifier of authenticity that cannot be copied, substituted or subdivided. Inscribed on the blockchain, it allows the artefact to which it is attached to be bought and sold.
Pak was an early mover in the space, and in three days in December 2021, their artwork The Merge generated $US91.8 million in revenue, from the sale of 250,000 NFTs that, when combined, coalesced into a single work. In all, 26,000 people owned a piece of the whole.
But when Shipton first reached out to Pak, the artist said they weren’t interested.
“They didn’t really want to delve into the political,” Shipton says. “So I started reaching out to other people, and then I came back to them, and they said they’d been thinking about this, thinking about censorship, and eventually had found a way where they could get involved, it made sense. They could see a pathway where they could create something that was in line with their mission, their vision as an artist.”
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50975
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22685558 (020805ZMAR25) Notable: Beijing tested our defences - Anthony Albanese blew it - "In three decades of working closely with governments on defence strategy, I have never seen a prime minister less competent than Anthony Albanese at leading on national security. For years Australian ministers have said the country faces the most difficult strategic circumstances since the end of World War II. The phrase has been repeated so often its meaning has been hollowed out and replaced with empty political blather. Is there no consequence to this worsening strategic outlook? Shouldn’t governments do something, like spend more on defence and make the military stronger? If the risk is near at hand, why are we reducing defence capabilities to pay for an imagined stronger Australian Defence Force in the 2030s and later? China’s threatening weapons tests in the Tasman last week are a consequence of successive Australian governments failing to anticipate strategic risk, and plan sensible responses. The reality of decades of not properly funding Defence is becoming clear. When our navy and air force are incapable of mounting a coherent operation to monitor, respond and pressure three Chinese ships firing weapons between the east coast of Australia and New Zealand, we should all understand this is an unacceptable political and military failure. Something must change, and quickly. What is supposedly a bipartisan approach to defence is not working. Spending is too low; equipment programs are badly designed and will not deliver for years. As a result, good people are leaving the ADF in unsustainably large numbers. There is no plan informing where and how we may need to use our forces, and a bureaucratic and political failure to think through how to deal with the biggest threat, China, and our most important partner, the US. The history of the 20th century shows that appeasement rather than military strength creates the basis for war. We need to stop appeasing China. Beijing will bully us for as long as we are prepared to submit to it. Australia needs to invest in its security and stand up for our values internationally. If we compromise on these we will turn into the third order country China wants us to be and the US fears we are becoming." - Peter Jennings, director of Strategic Analysis Australia, former executive director of the Australian Strategic Policy Institute (2012-22) and former deputy secretary for strategy in the Defence Department (2009-12) - theaustralian.com.au
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50957
>>50960
>>50961
Beijing tested our defences - Anthony Albanese blew it
In three decades of working closely with governments on defence strategy, I have never seen a prime minister less competent than Anthony Albanese at leading on national security.
PETER JENNINGS - March 01, 2025
1/3
For years Australian ministers have said the country faces the most difficult strategic circumstances since the end of World War II. The phrase has been repeated so often its meaning has been hollowed out and replaced with empty political blather.
Is there no consequence to this worsening strategic outlook? Shouldn’t governments do something, like spend more on defence and make the military stronger? If the risk is near at hand, why are we reducing defence capabilities to pay for an imagined stronger Australian Defence Force in the 2030s and later?
China’s threatening weapons tests in the Tasman last week are a consequence of successive Australian governments failing to anticipate strategic risk, and plan sensible responses. The reality of decades of not properly funding Defence is becoming clear.
When our navy and air force are incapable of mounting a coherent operation to monitor, respond and pressure three Chinese ships firing weapons between the east coast of Australia and New Zealand, we should all understand this is an unacceptable political and military failure.
Sounding aggrieved, Defence Industry Minister Pat Conroy claims the Chinese boats were subject to “unprecedented” levels of Australian surveillance. That might have been true if our forces had detected the weapons tests but floating meekly over the horizon impresses no one.
Something must change, and quickly. What is supposedly a bipartisan approach to defence is not working. Spending is too low; equipment programs are badly designed and will not deliver for years. As a result, good people are leaving the ADF in unsustainably large numbers.
There is no plan informing where and how we may need to use our forces, and a bureaucratic and political failure to think through how to deal with the biggest threat, China, and our most important partner, the US.
The problem starts at the top. In three decades of working closely with governments on defence strategy, I have never seen a prime minister less competent than Anthony Albanese at leading on national security.
Our national security system can carry a less-than-able minister in defence, foreign affairs or home affairs – goodness knows, the bureaucrats have had enough practice helping dud ministers look better than they really are.
It’s impossible, though, to compensate for the weakness of a below-average prime minister. The prime minister drives the show, sets the pace, determines priorities, demands action when officials advise doing nothing. In a political system such as ours, it’s only the prime minister (or on occasion a forceful and persuasive minister) who can stop policy failure and set a new course of action.
Albanese does not pass this test. On the Chinese ships, he was clearly not across the brief, did not understand Defence’s failure to properly monitor the live-fire drills, did not shape a muscular response to stand up to Beijing’s bullying and cannot explain the situation to the Australian public.
The Prime Minister’s account of the incident has been disproven in Senate committee evidence by the Chief of the Defence Force and by Airservices Australia officials.
Other than talking to his New Zealand counterpart, Albanese has not engaged personally with Chinese leader Xi Jinping or US President Donald Trump, Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba, Indonesian President Prabowo Subianto or indeed any leader who might help mount a co-ordinated response to Chinese maritime bullying.
This didn’t have to be Australia’s problem alone. Every country in the Indo-Pacific and many beyond are concerned at the extended reach and bullying behaviour of China’s navy and coastguard.
One Australian response to the Tasman live-fire incidents would have been to internationalise the problem. Had our navy and air force been directed to get up close and personal with their Chinese counterparts we could have provided film and audio recordings of the gunnery and Chinese manoeuvres.
We could have referred the matter to the UN, the G20, the Association of Southeast Asian Nations summit – not expecting these meetings would do anything but more to direct international opprobrium at Beijing. The Chinese Communist Party is sensitive to naming and shaming.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50976
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22685705 (020856ZMAR25) Notable: Controversial High Court ruling could be used against sex abuse victims like Greg - Greg Barclay lost his faith in Catholicism in 1970 when he was sexually assaulted by a Marist brother, but he says the church “hit a new low” when it pursued a legal defence that would obstruct some compensation claims by survivors of institutional abuse. A contentious decision handed down by the High Court in November found the Catholic Diocese of Ballarat was not responsible for the misconduct of its former priest Father Bryan Coffey because he could not be legally considered an employee of the church. The judgment in the trial of Bird v DP has upended thousands of legal cases involving religious orders, sporting clubs and not-for-profit organisations nationwide. The Sunday Age can reveal many survivors of historical sexual abuse are now under pressure to accept reduced financial settlements, or proceed to trial, where they face significant legal hurdles. Barclay’s case against the Marist Brothers is one of more than 1800 civil claims currently before Victorian courts that have been stymied by the recent court ruling. He was just 13 years old when he was abused by brother John Anthony Skehan at the former St Colman’s College in Shepparton. In 2014, Skehan was convicted of indecent assault and handed a suspended eight-month prison sentence. Barclay, now 68 years old, said he was stunned when the High Court found existing legislation did not provide a basis for imposing vicarious liability on the church for the misconduct of its clerics. The legal principle of vicarious liability is usually reserved for employers responsible for the wrongful or negligent conduct of their employees, regardless of whether the organisation is at fault. Barclay accuses the church, and its high-profile legal team, of deliberately pursuing the defence in the nation’s highest court, after it was unsuccessful in the Supreme Court of Victoria and the Court of Appeal. “Yet again, it shows to me that the church and the Marist Brothers are morally bankrupt. In my case, they agree and admit the abuse occurred, but now they are willing to use the law and hide behind the law to deny just compensation to survivors and mitigate their financial liability. “I shake my head in disbelief that an organisation that professes to maintain some moral high ground could actually do this to survivors,” Barclay said.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>>/qresearch/22262593 (pb)
Controversial High Court ruling could be used against sex abuse victims like Greg
Cameron Houston - March 1, 2025
1/2
Greg Barclay lost his faith in Catholicism in 1970 when he was sexually assaulted by a Marist brother, but he says the church “hit a new low” when it pursued a legal defence that would obstruct some compensation claims by survivors of institutional abuse.
A contentious decision handed down by the High Court in November found the Catholic Diocese of Ballarat was not responsible for the misconduct of its former priest Father Bryan Coffey because he could not be legally considered an employee of the church.
The judgment in the trial of Bird v DP has upended thousands of legal cases involving religious orders, sporting clubs and not-for-profit organisations nationwide.
The Sunday Age can reveal many survivors of historical sexual abuse are now under pressure to accept reduced financial settlements, or proceed to trial, where they face significant legal hurdles.
Barclay’s case against the Marist Brothers is one of more than 1800 civil claims currently before Victorian courts that have been stymied by the recent court ruling.
He was just 13 years old when he was abused by brother John Anthony Skehan at the former St Colman’s College in Shepparton. In 2014, Skehan was convicted of indecent assault and handed a suspended eight-month prison sentence.
Barclay, now 68 years old, said he was stunned when the High Court found existing legislation did not provide a basis for imposing vicarious liability on the church for the misconduct of its clerics.
The legal principle of vicarious liability is usually reserved for employers responsible for the wrongful or negligent conduct of their employees, regardless of whether the organisation is at fault.
Barclay accuses the church, and its high-profile legal team, of deliberately pursuing the defence in the nation’s highest court, after it was unsuccessful in the Supreme Court of Victoria and the Court of Appeal.
“Yet again, it shows to me that the church and the Marist Brothers are morally bankrupt. In my case, they agree and admit the abuse occurred, but now they are willing to use the law and hide behind the law to deny just compensation to survivors and mitigate their financial liability.
“I shake my head in disbelief that an organisation that professes to maintain some moral high ground could actually do this to survivors,” Barclay said.
Barclay’s lawyer, Laird Macdonald from Rightside Legal, said the recent High Court decision had created a different level of protection for religious orders, which was not extended to private or government schools. He said there were also anomalies with the treatment of different teachers at religious schools.
“We now have this crazy divide, where a student abused by a lay school teacher at a religious school has access to a vicarious liability argument in court. However, if a student in the classroom next door was abused by a brother or a priest, then they would not have access.”
A spokeswoman for the Marist Brothers Australia said the organisation was committed to providing fair compensation to survivors through the civil legal process and the National Redress Scheme, irrespective of the recent High Court decision.
“The relevance of Bird v DP to claims involving Marist Brothers will continue to be considered on a case-by-case basis, especially given the highly fact-specific circumstances in which vicarious liability is likely to be established in claims,” the Marist Brothers spokeswoman said.
However, other victims of clerical abuse insist different Catholic orders are exploiting the High Court judgment to further delay legal proceedings.
A Gippsland man, given the court-ordered pseudonym FG, has seen his civil case reach an impasse, after years of legal wrangling with the church. He was abused by paedophile Monsignor Joseph Daly at St Joseph’s Primary School in Gippsland in the early 1970s.
“This has been going on for five years, and they’ve tried every trick in the book to drag out the legal process with permanent stays. There was never any honest attempt at mediation,” the man known as FG said.
“It shouldn’t come as a surprise to anyone that they would go to any lengths available to protect themselves and their financial situation. They’ll exploit any loophole to deny their victims,” he said.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50977
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22691939 (030841ZMAR25) Notable: Beijing’s top diplomat issues warning as Chinese warships head towards Perth - China’s top diplomat in Australia has suggested the Albanese government is “overstretching” the definition of national security risk with its ban on artificial intelligence app DeepSeek, amid rising tensions between the two countries just weeks out from a federal election. As a group of Chinese warships on Sunday tracked closer to Perth, Xiao Qian warned that Australia and other countries using national security to restrict access to DeepSeek were politicising trade and undermining global technological progress. The intervention by China’s ambassador to Australia follows an announcement by Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke to ban DeepSeek from all government systems and devices after intelligence agencies assessed the software posed an “unacceptable risk” to national security. The Albanese government, which has also banned public servants from using the Chinese-owned TikTok on official devices, did not apply restrictions for private users, but urged them to “ensure they are well informed about how their data can be used online”. Writing in The Australian, Mr Xiao said “small yards with high fences will only lead to self-isolation” and that “openness and co-operation are the only viable option” for Australia. “DeepSeek’s application will greatly benefit the world in various aspects. Taking restrictive measures against it under the pretext of ‘security risks’ is an attempt to overstretch the concept of national security and politicise trade and tech issues,” Mr Xiao wrote.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>>/qresearch/22513186 (pb)
>>50957
>>50971
Beijing’s top diplomat issues warning as Chinese warships head towards Perth
GEOFF CHAMBERS - 3 March 2025
1/2
China’s top diplomat in Australia has suggested the Albanese government is “overstretching” the definition of national security risk with its ban on artificial intelligence app DeepSeek, amid rising tensions between the two countries just weeks out from a federal election.
As a group of Chinese warships on Sunday tracked closer to Perth, Xiao Qian warned that Australia and other countries using national security to restrict access to DeepSeek were politicising trade and undermining global technological progress.
The intervention by China’s ambassador to Australia follows an announcement by Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke to ban DeepSeek from all government systems and devices after intelligence agencies assessed the software posed an “unacceptable risk” to national security.
The Albanese government, which has also banned public servants from using the Chinese-owned TikTok on official devices, did not apply restrictions for private users, but urged them to “ensure they are well informed about how their data can be used online”.
Writing in The Australian, Mr Xiao said “small yards with high fences will only lead to self-isolation” and that “openness and co-operation are the only viable option” for Australia.
“DeepSeek’s application will greatly benefit the world in various aspects. Taking restrictive measures against it under the pretext of ‘security risks’ is an attempt to overstretch the concept of national security and politicise trade and tech issues,” Mr Xiao wrote.
“This would hinder technological progress worldwide and is detrimental to global economic recovery and development. Decoupling and severing of supply chains have no future, and building “small yards with high fences” will only lead to self-isolation.”
Under pressure from the Coalition over his response to a People’s Liberation Army Navy task group conducting live fire exercises in the Tasman Sea and circumnavigating the Australian coastline, Anthony Albanese on Sunday attacked the Morrison government for being softer on China.
In a pre-election move that could spark retaliation from Beijing, the Prime Minister said his government would always stand up in “Australia’s national interest”.
“In 2019 on Scott Morrison’s watch, there were Chinese warships, not around the coast, in Sydney Harbour. Pulled up to Garden Island there, given the welcome mat. In 2022 there were surveillance ships from China off the coast of Western Australia. There was … no monitoring whatsoever by the former government,” Mr Albanese said.
“And of course, the former government are the mob who leased the Port of Darwin – our most important northern port – to a company that directly has links with the Government of the People’s Republic of China. And then one of their ministers, of course, went to serve on the board of that company.”
Despite Beijing being linked to industrial-scale cyber attacks targeting critical infrastructure in Australia and other western nations, Mr Xiao defended DeepSeek by claiming “China extremely prioritises data security in AI development”.
“The Chinese government attaches great importance to data security and has always adhered to the rule of law in protecting data. It has never required, nor will it require, companies or individuals to collect or store data illegally,” he wrote.
“DeepSeek not only implements privacy policies that comply with the most stringent international standards but also clearly outlines the location and methods of data storage. The company uses advanced data encryption and anonymisation technologies to ensure that user data is not misused, earning high praise from AI experts worldwide, including those from Australia.”
Mr Xiao, who marked three years in the post in January and recently told The Australia that Australia must “respect Beijing’s territorial claims in the South China Sea”, is being tipped to remain in his current job until following the upcoming federal election.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50978
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22691963 (030855ZMAR25) Notable: China a willing AI partner in building bright new world - "Recently, a Chinese artificial intelligence company, DeepSeek, launched an open-source model free for commercial use with outstanding performance, which has been widely welcomed by global users and praised by international media. DeepSeek’s application will greatly benefit the world in various aspects. Taking restrictive measures against it under the pretext of “security risks” is an attempt to overstretch the concept of national security and politicise trade and tech issues. This would hinder technological progress worldwide and is detrimental to global economic recovery and development. China’s artificial intelligence efforts are driving global technological progress. In recent years, new breakthroughs in AI technology have become a key driver of the new round of technological revolution and industrial transformation. DeepSeek is one of the outstanding representatives in this field. Compared to other AI models, DeepSeek requires less computing power, incurs lower costs, and can be downloaded and used for free by anyone. This makes AI innovation truly accessible to all humanity, providing a low-cost, high-performance model for AI development in countries around the world, including Australia. DeepSeek has accelerated the democratisation of the latest AI advancements, propelling the global technology industry to new heights, and it has received widespread acclaim from international tech giants. As the era of AI accelerates, China is ready to work with Australia to enhance mutual understanding and trust, deepen pragmatic co-operation, and jointly build an open, inclusive, equitable, secure and non-discriminatory AI development environment. Together, we will explore the vast potential of artificial intelligence and contribute to a brighter, intelligent future for the whole world." - Xiao Qian, China’s ambassador to Australia - theaustralian.com.au
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>>/qresearch/22513186 (pb)
>>50971
>>50977
China a willing AI partner in building bright new world
XIAO QIAN - 3 March 2025
1/2
Recently, a Chinese artificial intelligence company, DeepSeek, launched an open-source model free for commercial use with outstanding performance, which has been widely welcomed by global users and praised by international media.
DeepSeek’s application will greatly benefit the world in various aspects.
Taking restrictive measures against it under the pretext of “security risks” is an attempt to overstretch the concept of national security and politicise trade and tech issues.
This would hinder technological progress worldwide and is detrimental to global economic recovery and development. In this regard, I would like to make clarification on two points.
First, China’s artificial intelligence efforts are driving global technological progress. In recent years, new breakthroughs in AI technology have become a key driver of the new round of technological revolution and industrial transformation. DeepSeek is one of the outstanding representatives in this field.
Compared to other AI models, DeepSeek requires less computing power, incurs lower costs, and can be downloaded and used for free by anyone. This makes AI innovation truly accessible to all humanity, providing a low-cost, high-performance model for AI development in countries around the world, including Australia.
DeepSeek has accelerated the democratisation of the latest AI advancements, propelling the global technology industry to new heights, and it has received widespread acclaim from international tech giants.
Second, China extremely prioritises data security in AI development. China’s government attaches great importance to data security and has always adhered to the rule of law in protecting data. It has never required, nor will it require, companies or individuals to collect or store data illegally. In the field of AI, China has always maintained a dual focus on development and regulation, ensuring strict protection of data security.
As early as 2020, China took the lead in proposing the Global Initiative on Data Security, which explicitly called on all countries to refrain from directly accessing foreign data from companies or individuals. In 2022, President Xi Jinping introduced the Global Security Initiative, which called for strengthening international governance on emerging technologies such as AI. In 2023, President Xi put forward the Global Initiative for AI Governance, advocating for the protection of personal privacy and data security in AI applications worldwide. Currently, China is working with more than 100 countries and regional organisations to implement these initiatives, jointly safeguarding global data security.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50979
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22691991 (030926ZMAR25) Notable: Tara Palmeri Tweet: Epstein survivor @VRSVirginia told me Pam Bondi's FBI files are "not good enough." They're just her public court documents rehashed. She wants the videos and photos that she's seen at the FBI. Musk promised her more, but she's hopeful for Phase 2.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Virginia Roberts Giuffre Tweet
@tarapalmeri I want to take a moment to express my heartfelt gratitude for your courageous words regarding the release of Phase 1 of the #Epsteinfiles ..Your commitment to shining a light on these issues is not just vital for me, @VRSVirginia Roberts, but for every victim of human trafficking who has been silenced for too long.
The disappointment we feel as victims is profound. In what is supposed to be a democratic society, where are our rights to freedom of information in MAGA America? It’s disheartening to witness what feels like a dog and pony show turned political stunt. True democracy should embody freedom, yet we continue to find ourselves trapped in a system that overlooks our struggles until it’s convenient for those in power.
As taxpaying citizens, we have earned the right to trust our elected representatives. It raises uncomfortable questions: Does justice only apply when it suits certain agendas? I sincerely hope that Phase II of the Epstein files will not follow the same path as its predecessor but instead provide transparency and honesty about the evidence that has caused so much suffering.
Having witnessed the trauma inflicted upon the girl I once was, I truly believed that leaders like @realDonaldTrump and @elonmusk aimed to “Drain The Swamp.” However, my faith is waning. I hope they prove me wrong and that justice will finally be served for the hundreds of victims, including myself, who continue to suffer from the PTSD inflicted by those we are told to trust.
Thank you for being a truth seeker and for your unwavering fight for justice. Together, may we strive for a government that truly serves the people and upholds the principles of freedom for all. 🦋
God bless you and God bless America 🇺🇸
https://x.com/VRSVirginia/status/1895727198071660806
—
Tara Palmeri Tweet
Epstein survivor @VRSVirginia told me Pam Bondi's FBI files are "not good enough." They're just her public court documents rehashed. She wants the videos and photos that she's seen at the FBI. Musk promised her more, but she's hopeful for Phase 2.
https://youtu.be/1Ppfs4x8dIk?feature=shared
https://x.com/tarapalmeri/status/1895522094739571092
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50980
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22691994 (030928ZMAR25) Notable: Video: Epstein Survivors BLAST Bondi's 'Circus,' Elon Musk promised more - Epstein Survivors Virginia Roberts Giuffre and Marijke Chartouni spoke exclusively to Tara Palmeri about their disappointment in Attorney General Pam Bondi's release of supposedly new information on Jeffrey Epstein. They said Bondi just re-released public information, mostly their case documents, in binds. Giuffre, who accused Prince Andrew of sexual assault said she was promised more from Elon Musk over X. She said she's seen photo and video evidence at the FBI and she wants it released. What do you think? Tara Palmeri is one of the most feared and fearless reporters in Washington, D.C. She has 15 years of experience covering national politics and foreign affairs. She was formerly a White House Correspondent for ABC News where she covered the first Trump administration. She was the chief National Correspondent for POLITICO during the Biden administration. She has been a political analyst for CNBC, CBS and CNN. She started her career as a columnist for the Washington Examiner and then went on to report for the New York Post. She was a foreign correspondent for POLITICO Europe, where she covered international affairs, including Brexit. She writes a weekly newsletter for Puck and hosts the Ringer's political podcast "Somebody's Gotta Win." Tara also hosted two acclaimed podcasts on Jeffrey Epstein, "Broken: Jeffrey Epstein" and "Power: The Maxwells."
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50979
Epstein Survivors BLAST Bondi's 'Circus,' Elon Musk promised more
Tara Palmeri
Mar 1, 2025
Epstein Survivors Virginia Roberts Giuffre and Marijke Chartouni spoke exclusively to Tara Palmeri about their disappointment in Attorney General Pam Bondi's release of supposedly new information on Jeffrey Epstein. They said Bondi just rereleased public information, mostly their case documents, in binds. Giuffre, who accused Prince Andrew of sexual assault said she was promised more from Elon Musk over X. She said she's seen photo and video evidence at the FBI and she wants it released. What do you think?
00:00 Epstein Survivors Want More from Pam Bondi Files
00:24 Virginia Roberts Giuffre said it's her "rehashed" court documents
00:56 They want the "untouchables" held accountable
01:39 Elon Musk promised Virginia More Files on X
03:02 Trump named in evidence released for being Epstein contact
03:45 Victims demand justice
04:57 Right Wing Media were Trump's props
Tara Palmeri is one of the most feared and fearless reporters in Washington, D.C. She has 15 years of experience covering national politics and foreign affairs. She was formerly a White House Correspondent for ABC News where she covered the first Trump administration. She was the chief National Correspondent for POLITICO during the Biden administration. She has been a political analyst for CNBC, CBS and CNN. She started her career as a columnist for the Washington Examiner and then went on to report for the New York Post. She was a foreign correspondent for POLITICO Europe, where she covered international affairs, including Brexit. She writes a weekly newsletter for Puck and hosts the Ringer's political podcast "Somebody's Gotta Win." Tara also hosted two acclaimed podcasts on Jeffrey Epstein, "Broken: Jeffrey Epstein" and "Power: The Maxwells."
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1Ppfs4x8dIk
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50981
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22706042 (050855ZMAR25) Notable: Trump admin to Australia: spending $56 billion on defence isn’t enough by half - The Trump administration is pushing Australia to dramatically increase defence spending to counter China’s rise, with one of the US president’s top Pentagon picks calling for military spending to rise to at least 3 per cent of gross domestic product. The first explicit call by a senior Trump administration figure for Australia to boost military expenditure would require tens of billions of dollars in extra annual spending and strain the Commonwealth’s ability to fund other portfolios such as health, education and welfare. Defence spending is currently hovering just above 2 per cent of gross domestic product (GDP), which amounts to $56 billion a year. Elbridge Colby, Donald Trump’s choice to be head of policy at the US Defence Department, told a US Senate committee on Wednesday that Australia is a “core US ally” and that the military relationship between the two allies is “excellent”. “The main concern the United States should press with Australia, consistent with the president’s approach, is higher defence spending,” Colby told the US Senate Armed Services Committee in written answers. “Australia is currently well below the 3 per cent level advocated for NATO, by NATO Secretary General [Mark] Rutte, and Canberra faces a far more powerful challenge in China.” This is the first time a senior Trump administration official has explicitly called for Australia to spend more on defence.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50962
Trump admin to Australia: spending $56 billion on defence isn’t enough by half
Matthew Knott - March 5, 2025
1/2
The Trump administration is pushing Australia to dramatically increase defence spending to counter China’s rise, with one of the US president’s top Pentagon picks calling for military spending to rise to at least 3 per cent of gross domestic product.
The first explicit call by a senior Trump administration figure for Australia to boost military expenditure would require tens of billions of dollars in extra annual spending and strain the Commonwealth’s ability to fund other portfolios such as health, education and welfare.
Defence spending is currently hovering just above 2 per cent of gross domestic product (GDP), which amounts to $56 billion a year.
With national security set to feature prominently in the upcoming federal election campaign, Defence Minister Richard Marles defended the government’s plan to pump an extra $50 billion in defence over the next decade while the Coalition vowed to outspend Labor when it announces its costings.
Military experts have said the presence of a flotilla of Chinese warships off the coast of Australia in recent weeks has shown the need to significantly increase defence spending, especially on the navy.
The Australian Defence Force announced on Wednesday morning that the three Chinese ships had passed Perth, tracking past Australia’s largest naval base at Garden Island, and were coming close to completing a circumnavigation of the continent.
Elbridge Colby, Donald Trump’s choice to be head of policy at the US Defence Department, told a US Senate committee on Wednesday that Australia is a “core US ally” and that the military relationship between the two allies is “excellent”.
“The main concern the United States should press with Australia, consistent with the president’s approach, is higher defence spending,” Colby told the US Senate Armed Services Committee in written answers.
“Australia is currently well below the 3 per cent level advocated for NATO, by NATO Secretary General [Mark] Rutte, and Canberra faces a far more powerful challenge in China.”
This is the first time a senior Trump administration official has explicitly called for Australia to spend more on defence.
Colby is a China hawk who has previously been sceptical of AUKUS, calling the prospect of the US selling nuclear submarines “crazy”.
On Wednesday, Colby said he supported the pact but wanted to see more evidence that US submarine stocks would not be depleted by the plan to sell three to five Virginia-class submarines to Australia.
A raft of experts, including former Australian Defence Force chief Angus Houston, former Defence Department boss Dennis Richardson and former Home Affairs Department boss Mike Pezzullo, have also called for Australia to lift defence spending to 3 per cent of GDP.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50982
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22712493 (060822ZMAR25) Notable: Richard Marles leaves door open to heeding US call to boost defence spend' -The Albanese government has opened the door to boosting defence spending after one of US President Donald Trump’s key Pentagon appointees called for a massive rise in Australia’s military spending from 2 per cent to 3 per cent of GDP. Defence Minister Richard Marles revealed the government was ready for an “ongoing conversation” with the Trump administration about lifting defence spending further than the government’s promised $50bn boost over a decade. With national security set to be a prominent theme of the upcoming federal election, Mr Marles said it was “completely reasonable that America is asking its friends and allies around the world to do more” to safeguard their security. “We’re totally ready to engage in that conversation with the United States, which we’ve already started when I met with my counterpart, Secretary Pete Hegseth, a few weeks ago,” Mr Marles told The Australian’s Defending Australia summit in Adelaide. Mr Trump’s nominee for head of policy at the Pentagon, Elbridge Colby, said on Wednesday that Australia needed to lift defence spending to at least 3 per cent of GDP. Mr Colby also sounded a note of caution about the nation’s AUKUS preparations, warning the US faced “a very difficult problem” in meeting its pledge to supply three Virginia-class boats to Australia, due to its slower-than-expected submarine production. But Mr Marles said he was confident the Trump administration would honour the US’s AUKUS commitments, saying he and Mr Hegseth had a “shared sense of mission around our alliance, very much including AUKUS”.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50962
>>50981
Richard Marles leaves door open to heeding US call to boost defence spend
BEN PACKHAM - 6 March 2025
1/2
The Albanese government has opened the door to boosting defence spending after one of US President Donald Trump’s key Pentagon appointees called for a massive rise in Australia’s military spending from 2 per cent to 3 per cent of GDP.
Defence Minister Richard Marles revealed the government was ready for an “ongoing conversation” with the Trump administration about lifting defence spending further than the government’s promised $50bn boost over a decade.
With national security set to be a prominent theme of the upcoming federal election, Mr Marles said it was “completely reasonable that America is asking its friends and allies around the world to do more” to safeguard their security.
“We’re totally ready to engage in that conversation with the United States, which we’ve already started when I met with my counterpart, Secretary Pete Hegseth, a few weeks ago,” Mr Marles told The Australian’s Defending Australia summit in Adelaide.
“We talked about defence spending, and there was a total acknowledgment of what we are doing in terms of lifting that trajectory. I think this ends up being an ongoing conversation.”
Mr Trump’s nominee for head of policy at the Pentagon, Elbridge Colby, said on Wednesday that Australia needed to lift defence spending to at least 3 per cent of GDP.
Mr Colby also sounded a note of caution about the nation’s AUKUS preparations, warning the US faced “a very difficult problem” in meeting its pledge to supply three Virginia-class boats to Australia, due to its slower-than-expected submarine production.
But Mr Marles said he was confident the Trump administration would honour the US’s AUKUS commitments, saying he and Mr Hegseth had a “shared sense of mission around our alliance, very much including AUKUS”.
Opposition defence spokesman Andrew Hastie said he believed AUKUS was “a lock” under Mr Trump, but he said it was vital the government “demonstrate a strong hand in future negotiations”. He said this could include a Ukraine-style offer of US access to Australia’s rare earth resources. “We’ve also seen in (Mr Trump’s) exchange with President Zelensky, that America is keen on rare earths,” Mr Hastie told the summit.
“So there’s a couple of things that we could be doing with the United States to strengthen our hand as things unfold … like a geopolitical off-take agreement with our rare earths.”
The government is under growing pressure to boost defence spending after Britain’s Prime Minister Keir Starmer led calls for both Britain and European nations to sharply increase defence spending for what he called a “generational challenge” in global security amid fears of an ascendant Russia and China.
Mr Trump has called on European nations to lift their defence spending to 5 per cent of GDP and Mr Colby’s comments are the first time a senior Trump Pentagon appointee has targeted Australia’s $55.7bn defence budget as inadequate to deal with the growing China threat.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50983
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22712502 (060828ZMAR25) Notable: Collins life-extensions a critical test, Marles warns - Richard Marles has warned planned life-extensions for the navy’s Collins-class submarines will be a high-risk endeavour but says he believes the $6bn project is “do-able”. The Defence Minister said the overhauls, to squeeze another decade of service out of the 30-year-old boats, would be a critical test of the nation’s submarine-building capabilities and a stepping stone to the AUKUS program. “This is a technologically challenging thing that we’re trying to do with Collins,” Mr Marles told The Australian’s Defending Australia summit in Adelaide. He said it was “completely fair” to question the project’s viability but he believed it would be a success. “Is it doable? I do think it’s doable. I think we’re going to be really smart and really clever in the way in which we do it,” Mr Marles said. He said it was vital that Australia had an “upwardly evolving submarine capability” as it prepared to build and run nuclear-powered boats and “extending Collins is a critical part of that”. The planned life-type extension works are vital to prevent a capability gap ahead of the arrival of Australia’s Virginia-class and promised AUKUS boats from the 2030s. But there are serious concerns in government and industry over the scale and complexity of the LOTE project, which will require the subs to be cut in half to replace their propulsion systems, diesel engines, generators, their power conversion and distribution systems, and install upgraded command and control systems.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50962
>>50981
Collins life-extensions a critical test, Marles warns
BEN PACKHAM - 6 March 2025
Richard Marles has warned planned life-extensions for the navy’s Collins-class submarines will be a high-risk endeavour but says he believes the $6bn project is “do-able”.
The Defence Minister said the overhauls, to squeeze another decade of service out of the 30-year-old boats, would be a critical test of the nation’s submarine-building capabilities and a stepping stone to the AUKUS program.
“This is a technologically challenging thing that we’re trying to do with Collins,” Mr Marles told The Australian’s Defending Australia summit in Adelaide.
He said it was “completely fair” to question the project’s viability but he believed it would be a success.
“Is it doable? I do think it’s doable. I think we’re going to be really smart and really clever in the way in which we do it,” Mr Marles said.
He said it was vital that Australia had an “upwardly evolving submarine capability” as it prepared to build and run nuclear-powered boats and “extending Collins is a critical part of that”.
The planned life-type extension works are vital to prevent a capability gap ahead of the arrival of Australia’s Virginia-class and promised AUKUS boats from the 2030s.
But there are serious concerns in government and industry over the scale and complexity of the LOTE project, which will require the subs to be cut in half to replace their propulsion systems, diesel engines, generators, their power conversion and distribution systems, and install upgraded command and control systems.
Those concerns were compounded in December when the government declared maintenance of the Collins-class boats to be a “project of concern”.
The ageing platforms have been beset with corrosion and other problems, which put all but one of the boats out of action late last year and have forced the navy to use them as lightly as possible to avoid wear and tear.
ASC boss Stuart Whiley revealed last week that three of the six submarines are currently out of the water, and that the corporation was struggling to catch up on its Collins maintenance schedule after losing 29,000 work hours to industrial action last year.
“Certainly we are behind our availability targets at this point in time,” Mr Whiley told a Senate estimates hearing, but declined to provide further details.
The Australian revealed last year that a classified assessment of the LOTE project by former US navy deputy assistant secretary Gloria Valde outlined extensive technical risks, saying the size and scope of the planned extensions had never before been attempted on the bespoke Collins-class boats.
She expressed concern that ASC lacked the necessary design and engineering experience to extend the life of the submarines for a full decade.
The LOTE project will be even more critical if there is any delay to the AUKUS timetable.
Mr Trump’s nominee for head of policy at the Pentagon, Elbridge Colby, sounded a note of caution over AUKUS on Wednesday, warning the US faced “a very difficult problem” in meeting its pledge to supply three Virginia-class boats to Australia due to its slower-than-expected submarine production.
He said AUKUS was “a great idea” but if there was a conflict with China over Taiwan it would be “absolutely essential” for the US to have as many Virginia-class submarines as possible.
Mr Colby said he had told Australia and the UK that restoring the US’s submarine-building capacity was a top priority “so we don’t have to face these awful choices”.
Mr Marles said he was confident the Trump administration would honour the US’s AUKUS commitments.
Opposition defence spokesman Andrew Hastie said he believed AUKUS was “a lock” under Mr Trump, but he said it was vital the government “demonstrate a strong hand in future negotiations”. He said this could include a Ukraine-style offer of US access to Australia’s rare earth resources.
https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/defence/collins-lifeextensions-a-critical-test-marles-warns/news-story/f5dd031420ae05113f77eb4115cadcb1
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50984
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22723204 (080334ZMAR25) Notable: Alan Jones charged with additional assault offence relating to 11th alleged victim - New South Wales police say they have charged former radio titan Alan Jones with an additional offence, bringing the total number of his alleged victims to 11. Police said on Friday they had charged the 83-year-old former Sydney radio host with an additional count of assault with act of indecency. Jones is due to appear before Sydney’s Downing Centre local court on 11 March in relation to the latest charge. He was charged in November with 26 historical sexual assault offences alleged to have occurred against nine people spanning almost two decades. In December, police charged Jones with an additional eight indecent assault offences alleged to have occurred against a 10th victim. Police allege the offences took place between 2001 and 2019, and say the youngest of the alleged victims was 17 at the time. On Friday, NSW police said detectives from the child abuse squad detectives had laid the additional charge, bringing Jones’s total number of alleged offences to 35. After his first court appearance in December, Jones stopped for a moment outside to speak to the throng of journalists that had surrounded him. “I am certainly not guilty, and I’ll be presenting my case to a jury, as you heard this morning,” he said at the time.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Alan Jones charged with additional assault offence relating to 11th alleged victim
Former radio host, who denies all previous allegations, charged with additional count of assault with act of indecency.
Catie McLeod - 7 Mar 2025
New South Wales police say they have charged former radio titan Alan Jones with an additional offence, bringing the total number of his alleged victims to 11.
Police said on Friday they had charged the 83-year-old former Sydney radio host with an additional count of assault with act of indecency.
Jones is due to appear before Sydney’s Downing Centre local court on 11 March in relation to the latest charge.
He was charged in November with 26 historical sexual assault offences alleged to have occurred against nine people spanning almost two decades.
In December, police charged Jones with an additional eight indecent assault offences alleged to have occurred against a 10th victim.
Police allege the offences took place between 2001 and 2019, and say the youngest of the alleged victims was 17 at the time.
Jones appeared for the first time at the Downing Centre local court in December, where it was confirmed he would face a jury trial and his lawyer said he would plead not guilty to the 34 charges.
The offences allegedly occurred in several different locations across NSW including Newtown, Sydney city, Fitzroy Falls and Alexandria, according to court documents.
On Friday, NSW police said detectives from the child abuse squad detectives had laid the additional charge, bringing Jones’s total number of alleged offences to 35.
Police set up Strike Force Bonnefin in March last year to investigate a number of alleged indecent assaults and sexual touching incidents allegedly involving Jones.
Historical allegations indecent assault against Jones were raised in December 2023 by the Sydney Morning Herald’s investigative reporter Kate McClymont.
In response Jones denied all wrongdoing and said he was planning legal action against Nine newspapers for the “demonstrably false” allegations.
Jones dominated breakfast radio in Sydney for 35 years until the then 79-year-old announced his retirement and stepped away from daily broadcasting in May 2020.
The former 2GB broadcaster was arrested at his luxury unit in Sydney’s Circular Quay on 18 November last year after a “long, thorough, protracted” investigation.
In November, when the first charges were laid against Jones, the NSW police commissioner, Karen Webb, told reporters police were anticipating more people coming forward.
Jones allegedly committed 11 offences against one man between 2008 and 2009, including touching his inner thigh, rubbing his penis and kissing him on the mouth, according to police charge sheets.
According to the charge sheets, the man who allegedly had 11 offences committed against him, known as Complainant C, was an employee of Jones, adding an element of aggravation because he was under the authority of Jones.
The ages of the victims are not disclosed in the charge sheets but police have said previously the youngest was 17 at the time of the offence.
After his first court appearance in December, Jones stopped for a moment outside to speak to the throng of journalists that had surrounded him.
“I am certainly not guilty, and I’ll be presenting my case to a jury, as you heard this morning,” he said at the time.
https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2025/mar/07/alan-jones-charged-with-additional-assault-offence-relating-to-11th-alleged-victim-ntwnfb
https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/alan-jones-charged-with-alleged-assault-of-eleventh-victim/news-story/699117d26051a32245a0166226147f5d#top
https://www.theage.com.au/national/nsw/alan-jones-hit-with-new-charge-against-11th-alleged-victim-20250307-p5lhve.html
https://qresear.ch/?q=Alan+Jones
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50985
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22740430 (110950ZMAR25) Notable: Ron Brierley charged with possessing child abuse material - Former corporate titan Ron Brierley has been charged with fresh child abuse material offences. The 87-year-old was arrested on Tuesday morning and faced Waverley Local Court where he was granted bail. Brierley, a former head of the Bank of New Zealand and ex-SCG Trust board member, was charged with three counts of possessing child abuse material. As per his bail conditions, he is “not to have any device capable of accessing the internet in his residence unless the device is in the personal custody of either his solicitor … with the exception of digital television, digital radio or digital kitchen appliances”. Brierley’s spectacular fall from grace began when he was stopped at Sydney Airport en route to Fiji in December 2019, caught with thousands of images on his laptop and two USBs. Thousands more images were found when police searched his Point Piper home by police. In October 2021, he was sentenced to a seven month non-parole period in prison after pleading guilty to three charges of possessing child abuse material. The files discovered did not depict children engaged in sexual acts but did depict children as young as four - with Brierley admitting he used the images for his own sexual gratification. A judge rejected his claims he did not know the images were illegal. Four months later, he successfully appealed his initial sentence, and was re-sentenced to four months non-parole.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ron Brierley charged with possessing child abuse material
JOANNA PANAGOPOULOS - 11 March 2025
Former corporate titan Ron Brierley has been charged with fresh child abuse material offences.
The 87-year-old was arrested on Tuesday morning and faced Waverley Local Court where he was granted bail.
Brierley, a former head of the Bank of New Zealand and ex-SCG Trust board member, was charged with three counts of possessing child abuse material.
As per his bail conditions, he is “not to have any device capable of accessing the internet in his residence unless the device is in the personal custody of either his solicitor … with the exception of digital television, digital radio or digital kitchen appliances”.
Brierley’s spectacular fall from grace began when he was stopped at Sydney Airport en route to Fiji in December 2019, caught with thousands of images on his laptop and two USBs.
Thousands more images were found when police searched his Point Piper home by police.
In October 2021, he was sentenced to a seven month non-parole period in prison after pleading guilty to three charges of possessing child abuse material.
The files discovered did not depict children engaged in sexual acts but did depict children as young as four – with Brierley admitting he used the images for his own sexual gratification. A judge rejected his claims he did not know the images were illegal.
Four months later, he successfully appealed his initial sentence, and was re-sentenced to four months non-parole. He was released from prison.
At the time, the NSW Supreme Court heard he was “a person in extreme ill health, in isolation within the general prison population” with Justice Des Fagan concluding that “the resources of Justice Health to deal with a geriatric prisoner are stretched beyond capability, at least with respect to this man”.
During the ensuing fallout, Brierley’s name was struck off from buildings and schools and he was stripped of his 1988 knighthood.
On Tuesday, he is excused from attending the court in person if represented by a lawyer on the next occasion, March 25.
https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/ron-brierley-charged-with-possessing-child-abuse-material/news-story/ff92d770290f0052567c5584dadbf0e6
https://qresear.ch/?q=Ron+Brierley
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50986
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22768026 (160905ZMAR25) Notable: Video: Daniel Morcombe case inspires new child protection measures, sex offender registry in Queensland - Queensland will introduce tougher child protection measures by the end of the year, taking action on the state government's election promise to Daniel Morcombe's parents. Queensland Premier David Crisafulli paid tribute to the 13-year-old Sunshine Coast murder victim on Sunday, announcing the LNP's "groundbreaking" three-pronged crackdown on child safety. "I made a commitment to Bruce and Denise [Morcombe] that there would be changes and there would be the creation of a child sex offender register, in honour of their brave little boy," Mr Crisafulli said. "We have to put the rights of victims [and] children ahead of the rights of sex offenders." The premier said $10 million would go into setting up a public website listing offenders who breach bail, flagging dangerous sex offenders with residents in local areas, and giving families a chance to check the history of newcomers in their lives. "If someone breaches their [bail] conditions, they lose the right to anonymity, and there should be a website that shows that," he said. "If there is a serious, hardcore paedophile living in an area, parents deserve to know that." The premier promised "change will continue to occur every day", envisioning a "stronger Queensland with fewer victims" but would not provide a roll-out date for Daniel's Law. He said the new measures will be actioned before the end of 2025 to provide "another layer of surveillance in the form of Mum and Dad".
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Daniel Morcombe case inspires new child protection measures, sex offender registry in Queensland
Gemma Ferguson - 16 March 2025
Queensland will introduce tougher child protection measures by the end of the year, taking action on the state government's election promise to Daniel Morcombe's parents.
Queensland Premier David Crisafulli paid tribute to the 13-year-old Sunshine Coast murder victim on Sunday, announcing the LNP's "groundbreaking" three-pronged crackdown on child safety.
"I made a commitment to Bruce and Denise [Morcombe] that there would be changes and there would be the creation of a child sex offender register, in honour of their brave little boy," Mr Crisafulli said.
"We have to put the rights of victims [and] children ahead of the rights of sex offenders."
The premier said $10 million would go into setting up a public website listing offenders who breach bail, flagging dangerous sex offenders with residents in local areas, and giving families a chance to check the history of newcomers in their lives.
"If someone breaches their [bail] conditions, they lose the right to anonymity, and there should be a website that shows that," he said.
"If there is a serious, hardcore paedophile living in an area, parents deserve to know that."
The premier promised "change will continue to occur every day", envisioning a "stronger Queensland with fewer victims" but would not provide a roll-out date for Daniel's Law.
He said the new measures will be actioned before the end of 2025 to provide "another layer of surveillance in the form of Mum and Dad".
Premier promises not to penny pinch
Mr Crisafulli remained steadfast when asked by media if he was worried about how effective the registry would be, and the potential for vigilantism.
"No, I'm not. I'm worried about child sex offenders running free," he said.
"There will be a conga line of people who have taken the 'soft on crime' approach, who will be telling us why [these new measures] can't occur.
"I'm telling you why it can, and we made the commitment that we were going to clamp down on child sex offenders. That's exactly what we'll be doing."
The premier said "we have every faith that it can be managed within our existing budgets", with Police Minister Dan Purdie responsible for implementing the changes.
"[We'll spend] $10 million to set it up, the ongoing operational cost will be somewhere in that order … It's a very small investment in making sure kids can be safe," Mr Crisafulli said.
"If further resources are needed to make sure that those platforms are even more user-friendly, we won't penny pinch.
"As we embark on it, I would like to also see a register that stops people jumping between different state jurisdictions as well."
He pointed to Western Australia, which Mr Crisafulli said is the only other jurisdiction to have taken similar action, where the registry has "been successful".
Bravehearts founder Hetty Johnston agreed "these laws can be effective if they're done in the same way" as WA, but said courts shouldn't be granting these repeat offenders bail in the first place.
"If they're dangerous sex offenders, we shouldn't be releasing them — that lies at the root cause of all of this," Ms Johnston said.
"It's freaking the community out and it's requiring all of this extra effort.
"If we're serious about protecting children against known child sex offenders, what we should be doing is keeping them in jail."
Morcombe family inspires change
Speaking to the ABC at the 20th anniversary Dance for Daniel charity fundraiser last night, Mr Crisafulli said the LNP would keep it's promise to establish the registry before the end of this calendar year.
"I promised the Morcombes, before the election, that we would do it," he said.
"Promises made, promises kept."
The premier said it was important Queensland parents were "given every chance" to understand "the dangers that lurk around them".
"I'd like to see it as the first step towards a national law, in time, as well," Mr Crisafulli said.
The premier said he hoped for support from the opposition, as the government tried to do "everything we can to make the state a safety place".
"If you can't protect your most vulnerable, your children, well you're not doing your job," he said.
Mr Crisafulli described Daniel Morcombe's parents as "two of the greatest Queenslanders I've ever met".
"They're incredibly gracious, humble, driven, and through their tragedy they've made the world a safer place," he said.
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-03-16/qld-daniels-law-child-safety-reform-protection-offender-registry/105057636
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50987
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22773376 (170954ZMAR25) Notable: Secret submarine scandal: Collins lined up for lite-on refit - A $5bn plan to extend the lives of the navy’s Collins-class submarines is in disarray as the government-owned shipbuilder ASC warns it won’t be ready to fully upgrade the first boat, raising the prospect of a capability gap before the arrival of the nation’s nuclear-powered subs. The Australian can reveal the Albanese government is now considering a scaled-back “life-of-type extension” for the first overhaul from next year, which won’t deliver the extra 10 years of operational life the boat needs. The proposed “LOTE lite” upgrade plan has been kept secret by Labor as it prepares for a khaki-tinged election campaign, which will throw a spotlight on its management of the defence portfolio. Multiple sources said the revised upgrade scope would leave the first boat in line, the 27-year-old HMAS Farncomb, with its main motor, diesel engines and generators in place, rather than having installed new ones as planned. Failure to replace the critical systems would undermine the boat’s reliability and shorten its planned lifespan, degrading the submarine force ahead of the transition to nuclear boats in the 2030s and 2040s. The prospect of the scaled-back upgrade comes amid growing concerns over the Trump administration’s commitment to AUKUS, and fears the navy is ill-equipped to protect Australia from China’s increasingly assertive bluewater fleet following the recent circumnavigation of Australia by advanced PLA-Navy warships.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50962
>>50983
Secret submarine scandal: Collins lined up for lite-on refit
BEN PACKHAM - 16 March 2025
1/2
A $5bn plan to extend the lives of the navy’s Collins-class submarines is in disarray as the government-owned shipbuilder ASC warns it won’t be ready to fully upgrade the first boat, raising the prospect of a capability gap before the arrival of the nation’s nuclear-powered subs.
The Australian can reveal the Albanese government is now considering a scaled-back “life-of-type extension” for the first overhaul from next year, which won’t deliver the extra 10 years of operational life the boat needs.
The proposed “LOTE lite” upgrade plan has been kept secret by Labor as it prepares for a khaki-tinged election campaign, which will throw a spotlight on its management of the defence portfolio.
Multiple sources said the revised upgrade scope would leave the first boat in line, the 27-year-old HMAS Farncomb, with its main motor, diesel engines and generators in place, rather than having installed new ones as planned. Failure to replace the critical systems would undermine the boat’s reliability and shorten its planned lifespan, degrading the submarine force ahead of the transition to nuclear boats in the 2030s and 2040s.
The prospect of the scaled-back upgrade comes amid growing concerns over the Trump administration’s commitment to AUKUS, and fears the navy is ill-equipped to protect Australia from China’s increasingly assertive bluewater fleet following the recent circumnavigation of Australia by advanced PLA-Navy warships.
The Chief of the Navy, Mark Hammond, told a Senate estimates hearing last month the upgrade plan for HMAS Farncomb was “unchanged at the moment”.
But sources close to the LOTE program, who declined to be identified because of the sensitivity of the navy’s submarine capabilities, said design and implementation studies had revealed ASC was highly unlikely to be ready to complete the full scope of works within the mandated two-year time frame.
“It’s not just a case of pulling out the current motor and putting a new motor in,” one source said.
“Everything needs to be designed because it’s a completely different shape, completely different technology. The design work just hasn’t been done.”
The source blamed ASC “incompetence” for the failure and warned of cascading ramifications for the program.
“These things take years to plan, years to do the design drawings, and they’ve basically missed the boat. And the real fear is if they’ve missed the boat for 2026, they’re just as likely to miss the boat for 2028 (when the second Collins-class submarine is due to enter the LOTE program).”
Another source said some ASC suppliers had contributed to the immaturity of the LOTE designs, and that Defence had slowed the process with late changes to system requirements.
The source said ASC was examining how much of the planned upgrade it would be able to complete within the two-year window.
The Australian sought a response from Defence Minister Richard Marles, but none was provided. Instead, a government spokeswoman blamed the Coalition for the problems facing the Collins fleet. “Over almost a decade in government, the Coalition ripped money out of the sustainment of the Collins class submarines and left Australia with the risk of a significant gap in respect of our submarine capability,” she said.
“The Albanese government restored this funding cut and is investing in priority capability enhancements and sustainment for the Collins class to ensure it remains a potent and credible platform for the Australian Defence Force.”
An ASC spokesperson said its LOTE design and procurement work was progressing in co-operation with navy and Defence.
The uncertainty over the LOTE program follows a high-level warning to the government, revealed by The Australian last year, over ASC’s ability to deliver the complex upgrades.
Former US navy deputy assistant secretary Gloria Valdez told the government in her classified report that the scale of the planned life extensions had never been attempted, and expressed concern that ASC lacked the design and engineering experience to undertake the work.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50988
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22773379 (170957ZMAR25) Notable: Video: Ex-PM Malcolm Turnbull rips into AUKUS and describes it as 'terrible deal' for Australia' - Former Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull has described the AUKUS partnership as a "terrible deal" for Australia. The ex-Liberal PM ripped into the trilateral defence pact with the US to deliver nuclear submarines and warned Australia could end up empty-handed. "AUKUS is a terrible deal. It is so unfair to Australia," Turnbull said during a doorstep interview in Canberra's Parliament House. "The most likely outcome of the AUKUS pillar one is that we will end up with no submarines of our own." He added: "We will have lost both sovereignty and security, and a lot of money as well. That's why I say it is a really bad deal." When questioned over reports US President Donald Trump supports the AUKUS deal, Turnbull said "of course" he would like it. He said the Trump administration would be pleased with the $3 billion dollar deal and claimed there was "no guarantee" Australia would ever be handed the promised US nuclear-powered submarines. "Of course he'd like it, it's such a bad deal for us," Turnbull added of the security agreement with Australia, the United Kingdom and US for a free and open Indo-Pacific. "He will be thinking who are these dumb guys who agreed to this deal?"
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50962
>>50771
Ex-PM Malcolm Turnbull rips into AUKUS and describes it as 'terrible deal' for Australia
April Glover - Mar 17, 2025
Former Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull has described the AUKUS partnership as a "terrible deal" for Australia.
The ex-Liberal PM ripped into the trilateral defence pact with the US to deliver nuclear submarines and warned Australia could end up empty-handed.
"AUKUS is a terrible deal. It is so unfair to Australia," Turnbull said during a doorstep interview in Canberra's Parliament House.
"The most likely outcome of the AUKUS pillar one is that we will end up with no submarines of our own."
He added: "We will have lost both sovereignty and security, and a lot of money as well.
"That's why I say it is a really bad deal."
When questioned over reports US President Donald Trump supports the AUKUS deal, Turnbull said "of course" he would like it.
He said the Trump administration would be pleased with the $3 billion dollar deal and claimed there was "no guarantee" Australia would ever be handed the promised US nuclear-powered submarines.
"Of course he'd like it, it's such a bad deal for us," Turnbull added of the security agreement with Australia, the United Kingdom and US for a free and open Indo-Pacific.
"He will be thinking who are these dumb guys who agreed to this deal?"
Earlier today, Turnbull similarly savaged Australia's role in the AUKUS deal on ABC Radio Sydney and said it was a "fiasco".
"The fundamental problem is that we are very, very likely, I would say, almost certain, never to get any Virginia class submarines,'' he said.
US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth said Trump was "supportive" of the deal in a meeting with Australia's Defence Minister and Deputy Prime Minister Richard Marles at the Pentagon in February.
The Albanese government made a $US500 million ($798 million) payment to Washington as part of the AUKUS deal ahead of the meeting between Marles and Hegseth.
The plan would provide Australia with three Virginia-class submarines from the US, which is supposed to boost America's lagging rate of submarine production.
"The president is very aware, supportive of AUKUS and … the investment Australia is willing to make," Hegseth said.
He also said the Trump Administration "sure hopes" to have them delivered on time, with the first one due by the early 2030s.
https://www.9news.com.au/national/aukus-deal-malcolm-turnbull-slams-partnership-as-bad-deal-for-australia/f8a5f288-0848-46ba-b830-0ee31c548620
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50989
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22773386 (171001ZMAR25) Notable: Visiting nuclear sub commander says US will 'follow through' on AUKUS - The commander of a visiting US Virginia-class submarine insists AUKUS will deliver the world's "most capable and stealthy vessel" to Australia's navy and has urged sceptical members of the public to better understand the benefits of nuclear-powered boats. As growing doubts emerge over the future of the US alliance under Donald Trump's administration, American submariners have shown off the cutting-edge war fighting features of the USS Minnesota during exercises off the West Australian coast. Commander Jeffrey Cornielle, the commanding officer of the USS Minnesota, says the warship is one of the most advanced in the world, and that Australia would gain the capability to "operate a nuclear-powered, conventionally armed warship". "The role of the fast attack submarine, the submarine that I operate, and I command is so dynamic that everything changes on a dime, anything from weather, operations, things that are happening around the world - and we can answer at a moment's notice," he said. "The things that this brings to our navy and to every navy that has nuclear-powered warships is significant and allows us to operate with essentially unlimited endurance, just limited by food". While showcasing his submarine, Commander Cornielle was reluctant to comment on Australia's progress towards preparing to operate nuclear-powered boats for the first time but said he believed his nation would honour its AUKUS commitments. "I think the people who are doing the negotiations, and the processes are gonna follow through with their agreements and transactions, I have no insight into what that looks like but we're working towards it, we're in pillar one now, we're moving forwards," Commander Cornielle said.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50962
Visiting nuclear sub commander says US will 'follow through' on AUKUS
Andrew Greene - 17 March 2025
The commander of a visiting US Virginia-class submarine insists AUKUS will deliver the world's "most capable and stealthy vessel" to Australia's navy and has urged sceptical members of the public to better understand the benefits of nuclear-powered boats.
As growing doubts emerge over the future of the US alliance under Donald Trump's administration, American submariners have shown off the cutting-edge war fighting features of the USS Minnesota during exercises off the West Australian coast.
Commander Jeffrey Cornielle, the commanding officer of the USS Minnesota, says the warship is one of the most advanced in the world, and that Australia would gain the capability to "operate a nuclear-powered, conventionally armed warship".
"The role of the fast attack submarine, the submarine that I operate, and I command is so dynamic that everything changes on a dime, anything from weather, operations, things that are happening around the world — and we can answer at a moment's notice," he said.
"The things that this brings to our navy and to every navy that has nuclear-powered warships is significant and allows us to operate with essentially unlimited endurance, just limited by food".
While showcasing his submarine, Commander Cornielle was reluctant to comment on Australia's progress towards preparing to operate nuclear-powered boats for the first time but said he believed his nation would honour its AUKUS commitments.
"I think the people who are doing the negotiations, and the processes are gonna follow through with their agreements and transactions, I have no insight into what that looks like but we're working towards it, we're in pillar one now, we're moving forwards," Commander Cornielle said.
"I would say do your research, meet your sailors — meet your sailors that are interacting with our sailors and understand what this process is and what it brings to the table and then make your own decision at that point."
Last month US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth declared President Donald Trump was "supportive" of the AUKUS project, after Australia sent a $US500 million ($798 million) payment to Washington as part of the plan to acquire nuclear-powered submarines.
Labor party members urge MPs to reject AUKUS under Trump
Meanwhile, a grassroots anti-AUKUS campaign called "Labor Against War" has recently written to every federal Labor MP and candidate, urging them to reassess the submarine deal given the "tremendous upheaval in US-Australian relations" under US President Donald Trump.
Former Labor senator and campaign patron Doug Cameron says he is certain that current government ministers and MPs are "extremely concerned" about the AUKUS partnership with the US but won't speak out because of "caucus solidarity".
"The first few weeks of Trump's presidency demonstrate he is belligerent, untrustworthy and dangerous," the former Labor Senator told the ABC.
"Persisting with AUKUS will detract from the many achievements of Labor in office.
"The caucus solidarity approach has taken what I think is a stupid approach to such a big decision. It was not considered enough, and here we are about to spend untold amounts of money on something that may never happen.
"I'm certainly not a pacifist, and I think there's an obligation on every Australian government to ensure the security of Australia — I just don't think AUKUS is the way to go."
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-03-17/uss-minnesota-commander-assures-australians-over-aukus-doubts/105058836
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50990
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22773389 (171003ZMAR25) Notable: Australia is buying the ‘best submarines in the world’. Here’s what we’ll get - A casual sailor enjoying a day on Fremantle Harbour could easily mistake the half-submerged nuclear submarine for a navigation marker - oblivious to the fact they are just a few hundred metres away from one of the United States military’s most prized assets. Stealthiness, after all, is the submariner’s superpower. “We want to be undisclosed, unknown wherever we are in the world,” says Jeffrey Cornielle, commanding officer of the USS Minnesota, one of the US Navy’s 24 Virginia-class fast-attack submarines. “That’s the No.1 thing.” It’s a glistening early autumn morning, and this masthead, alongside a handful of other media outlets, has been invited for a rare tour of a visiting Virginia-class submarine. Each boat costs around $8 billion to build and houses a crew of 140 people. Cornielle, matter of factly, describes the Virginia class as the world’s most advanced and capable military vessel. Accompanying us is Captain Neil Steinhagen, who admits he was not a fan of AUKUS at first. “Australia’s going to steal my resources, my parts, my people,” the 32-year US Navy veteran tells us, explaining his initial fears about the submarine pact. The US military is not producing enough submarines to meet its own stated needs, yet it has agreed to sell some of its crown jewels to Australia. Steinhagen commands a fleet of five nuclear-powered submarines headquartered at the US naval base, Guam, in the west Pacific. USS Minnesota joined his fleet last November - the first time a Virginia-class submarine has been forward-deployed at Guam, a tiny US territory closer to Beijing than Hawaii. The military base helps the US to project power into contested areas such as the South China Sea and Taiwan Strait. He was concerned that AUKUS would pull resources away from Guam but has embraced it as a way to promote stability throughout the Indo-Pacific. Cornielle, meanwhile, says his sailors are excited about becoming more integrated with the Australian Navy: “It’s going to bring a lot of energy to the fleet.”
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50962
>>50989
Australia is buying the ‘best submarines in the world’. Here’s what we’ll get
Matthew Knott - March 17, 2025
1/2
A casual sailor enjoying a day on Fremantle Harbour could easily mistake the half-submerged nuclear submarine for a navigation marker – oblivious to the fact they are just a few hundred metres away from one of the United States military’s most prized assets.
Stealthiness, after all, is the submariner’s superpower.
“We want to be undisclosed, unknown wherever we are in the world,” says Jeffrey Cornielle, commanding officer of the USS Minnesota, one of the US Navy’s 24 Virginia-class fast-attack submarines. “That’s the No.1 thing.”
It’s a glistening early autumn morning, and this masthead, alongside a handful of other media outlets, has been invited for a rare tour of a visiting Virginia-class submarine. Each boat costs around $8 billion to build and houses a crew of 140 people. Cornielle, matter of factly, describes the Virginia class as the world’s most advanced and capable military vessel.
Yes, aircraft carriers look impressive, but they bob along on the surface, vulnerable to attack. Hunter-killer submarines such as these have been dubbed the “apex predators” of 21st-century naval warfare. They prowl the ocean’s depths, forcing potential adversaries to second-guess their war-fighting plans.
“If someone wakes up and says ‘is today the day?’ we make sure they say ‘maybe not’,” Cornielle explains as we cram together for a briefing in the officers’ wardroom. Space here, like everywhere aboard, is scarce. In an emergency, the dining room table we are sitting at can be used to treat sick or injured crew members.
The USS Minnesota has been conducting training operations off Western Australia for the past three weeks. The submarine’s long-planned arrival happened to coincide with a Chinese naval flotilla conducting a circumnavigation of the continent, offering a powerful symbol of the increasingly contested region in which Australia finds itself.
Military experts said it was possible the flotilla was travelling with a Chinese nuclear-powered submarine, which would have remained underwater for the entire mission. Cornielle declines to comment on China’s naval capability, even though it is the crucial factor driving US defence priorities.
USS Minnesota’s visit has also come amid renewed debate about the future of the AUKUS submarine pact, which it is estimated will cost up to $368 billion by the time Australia’s subs are in operation in the 2040s. President Donald Trump’s treatment of allies such as Canada and the decision to reject Australia’s pleas for an exemption from steel and aluminium tariffs has convinced many that the US has become an unreliable partner.
Last week, former Defence Force chief Admiral Chris Barrie called on the government to urgently prepare a plan B in case the pact goes belly-up.
Off the coast of WA, however, AUKUS Plan A is proceeding at pace. Visits like this are ramping up ahead of 2027, when up to four US nuclear-powered submarines are set to be based at Perth in a presence to be known as Submarine Rotational Force-West. Then, from the early 2030s, Australia is scheduled to acquire three Virginia-class submarines from the US as the nation begins phasing out its fleet of ageing, diesel-powered Collins-class submarines.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50991
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22773399 (171007ZMAR25) Notable: US starts to build submarine presence on strategic Australian coast under AUKUS - In the control room of the American Virginia class attack submarine USS Minnesota, off the Western Australian coast, sonar operators adjust to the chatter of dolphins in new waters where the U.S. submarine presence will soon grow significantly. On a training exercise from its home port in Guam, USS Minnesota is a forerunner to four Virginia class submarines that will be hosted at a Western Australian naval base from 2027, under the AUKUS partnership to transfer nuclear submarine capability to Australia. Crew use video game joysticks to interrogate screen images from a photonic mast that has replaced a periscope. Life aboard can mean up to 100 days without seeing sunlight, and intermittent communication with families via email to maintain stealth. Commanding officer Jeffrey Corneille says the Virginia class submarine is "the most advanced warship in the world". "If someone wakes up and they say 'Is today the day?', we make sure that they say 'Maybe not'," he says, describing its deterrent role. Around 50-80 United States navy personnel will arrive by the middle of the year at Western Australia's HMAS Stirling base, which is undergoing an A$8 billion ($5 billion) upgrade to prepare for the "Submarine Rotational Force West", Australian officials have said. In two years, those numbers will swell to hundreds of U.S. navy personnel and support crew.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50962
>>50989
US starts to build submarine presence on strategic Australian coast under AUKUS
Kirsty Needham - March 17, 2025
PERTH, March 16 (Reuters) - In the control room of the American Virginia class attack submarine USS Minnesota, off the Western Australian coast, sonar operators adjust to the chatter of dolphins in new waters where the U.S. submarine presence will soon grow significantly.
On a training exercise from its home port in Guam, USS Minnesota is a forerunner to four Virginia class submarines that will be hosted at a Western Australian naval base from 2027, under the AUKUS partnership to transfer nuclear submarine capability to Australia.
Crew use video game joysticks to interrogate screen images from a photonic mast that has replaced a periscope. Life aboard can mean up to 100 days without seeing sunlight, and intermittent communication with families via email to maintain stealth.
Commanding officer Jeffrey Corneille says the Virginia class submarine is "the most advanced warship in the world".
"If someone wakes up and they say 'Is today the day?', we make sure that they say 'Maybe not'," he says, describing its deterrent role.
Around 50-80 United States navy personnel will arrive by the middle of the year at Western Australia's HMAS Stirling base, which is undergoing an A$8 billion ($5 billion) upgrade to prepare for the "Submarine Rotational Force West", Australian officials have said.
In two years, those numbers will swell to hundreds of U.S. navy personnel and support crew.
The location of HMAS Stirling, closer to Asia and the Indian Ocean than the U.S. Pacific fleet headquarters in Hawaii, is strategically important to the United States, said Peter Dean, director of Foreign Policy and Defence at the United States Studies Centre at the University of Sydney.
"Defending the Indian Ocean against rising Chinese capabilities and power is important," he said.
The Virginia submarine program has been exempted from Pentagon budget cuts as the Trump administration focuses less on the Middle East and Europe, and more on the Indo Pacific, he said.
The Trump administration's number three Pentagon official, Elbridge Colby, told a U.S. Senate confirmation hearing this month the attack submarines are "absolutely essential" for making the defence of Taiwan viable, and production rates must be lifted to first meet U.S. needs and also to fulfill its obligations to sell submarines to Australia under the AUKUS pact.
The USS Minnesota moved its home port from Hawaii to the U.S. Pacific territory of Guam, closer to Taiwan and the only forward-deployed U.S. submarine base, in November.
A Chinese navy task group that circumnavigated Australia in February and March, holding unprecedented live fire drills off the east coast that disrupted commercial airlines, before passing Western Australia to coincide with the USS Minnesota's port call and heading into the Indian Ocean, has highlighted China's ambition to operate more frequently in Australia's neighbourhood, Australian officials said.
Under AUKUS, Australia’s most expensive defence project, Australia will buy two used Virginia class submarines next decade, and build a new class of nuclear powered submarine with Britain, to replace its ageing diesel powered fleet.
In preparation, there are 115 Australians in the U.S. nuclear navy training pipeline or on Virginia submarines, plus 130 training for nuclear submarine maintenance at Pearl Harbor in Hawaii, U.S. navy officials said.
https://www.reuters.com/business/aerospace-defense/us-starts-build-submarine-presence-strategic-australian-coast-under-aukus-2025-03-16/
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50992
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22773405 (171010ZMAR25) Notable: Former Salisbury Futures Church pastor arrested in US for alleged possession of child abuse images - A former youth pastor from a mega church in Adelaide's northern suburbs has been arrested in the United States on charges of possessing child sexual abuse material. Daniel Menelaou, 28, was arrested last week by police in Atlanta, Georgia after he allegedly sent multiple videos containing abuse on the social media platform Kik. Mr Menelaou spent several years working as a youth pastor at Futures Church, which was previously known as the Influencers Church, and has several campuses across South Australia. Prior to his departure he had been at the Salisbury campus before taking up the same role at the church's Atlanta site last year. Allegations revealed in warrant A Fulton County warrant, obtained by the ABC, alleged the videos were sent by Mr Menelaou between July 2024 and January this year. It said the Roswell Police Department - along with Georgia Bureau of Investigations and Homeland Security Investigations officers — searched his home at Roswell, just outside Atlanta, on March 11. According to an arrest affidavit signed by an officer, Mr Menelaou said in a police interview he was sent "child pornography videos and images" by users on Kik. "Daniel Menelaou talked a lot about his pornography addiction, and he stated that he deleted his Kik account several times over the last couple of years, but then reinstalled it," an arrest affidavit said. In a statement, Roswell Police said detectives began investigating a cyber-tip at the end of February. "That tip lead our investigators to the Roswell home of Daniel Menelaou," the statement said. Police said several electronic devices were seized from the home for further analysis. "The investigation is still active and ongoing, and additional charges may be forthcoming," they said. Mr Menelaou has been charged with six counts of possession of child sexual abuse material.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Former Salisbury Futures Church pastor arrested in US for alleged possession of child abuse images
Kathryn Bermingham - 17 March 2025
A former youth pastor from a mega church in Adelaide's northern suburbs has been arrested in the United States on charges of possessing child sexual abuse material.
Daniel Menelaou, 28, was arrested last week by police in Atlanta, Georgia after he allegedly sent multiple videos containing abuse on the social media platform Kik.
Mr Menelaou spent several years working as a youth pastor at Futures Church, which was previously known as the Influencers Church, and has several campuses across South Australia.
Prior to his departure he had been at the Salisbury campus before taking up the same role at the church's Atlanta site last year.
Allegations revealed in warrant
A Fulton County warrant, obtained by the ABC, alleged the videos were sent by Mr Menelaou between July 2024 and January this year.
It said the Roswell Police Department — along with Georgia Bureau of Investigations and Homeland Security Investigations officers — searched his home at Roswell, just outside Atlanta, on March 11.
According to an arrest affidavit signed by an officer, Mr Menelaou said in a police interview he was sent "child pornography videos and images" by users on Kik.
"Daniel Menelaou talked a lot about his pornography addiction, and he stated that he deleted his Kik account several times over the last couple of years, but then reinstalled it," an arrest affidavit said.
In a statement, Roswell Police said detectives began investigating a cyber-tip at the end of February.
"That tip lead our investigators to the Roswell home of Daniel Menelaou," the statement said.
Police said several electronic devices were seized from the home for further analysis.
"The investigation is still active and ongoing, and additional charges may be forthcoming," they said.
Mr Menelaou has been charged with six counts of possession of child sexual abuse material.
Condemnation from church
In a statement, a Futures Church spokesperson said the charges were "abhorrent, appalling, and completely contrary to everything we stand for" and they were "horrified by what has been revealed".
"Until his arrest, we had no prior knowledge of any allegations or indication of wrongdoing," the spokesperson said.
"The details outlined in the arrest warrant are deeply disturbing and stand in total opposition to our unwavering commitment to protecting children."
The statement said Futures Church had a "zero-tolerance policy regarding any form of abuse".
It said Mr Menelaou's position had now been terminated, and added "Futures Church is in no way responsible or affiliated with these actions of Daniel Menelaou".
Futures Church told its local congregation of the charges in an email on Monday morning.
"In recent days, one of our youth ps working overseas, Daniel Menelaou, was arrested and charged with possession of materials depicting minors in sexually explicit content," it said.
"Like you, we are deeply shocked, grieved and blindsided by this news.
"We also want to be absolutely clear that these charges have no connection to anyone in our church community."
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-03-17/former-futures-church-pastor-daniel-menelaou-arrested-in-us/105060940
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50993
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22773409 (171013ZMAR25) Notable: Adelaide Futures church youth pastor Daniel Menelaou arrested, charged in the US over child abuse material - A married Adelaide youth pastor from one of the city’s biggest churches has been arrested in the US over videos allegedly depicting child abuse. Daniel Menelaou, 28, was arrested in the US state of Georgia following a tip-off that alleged he had been sharing sexually explicit videos featuring children. Mr Menelaou was charged last Wednesday with possession or control of any material depicting a minor in sexually explicit conduct. The messages were allegedly shared through a messaging app, with authorities seizing a number of electronic devices from the South Australian man after they started investigating a cyber tip-off. Mr Menelaou’s Instagram and Facebook accounts have been disabled. According to his LinkedIn, he served as a youth pastor at the Paradise-based Futures Church - formerly Influencers Church. He relocated to Georgia, where he was working in a similar role at Futures’ megachurch campus at Alpharetta. He was involved with Young Adults Alpharetta and less than a month before his arrest was featured on its Instagram account promoting a young adult service. A spokesman for Futures Church said they were “horrified” by the charges and “categorically condemn these (alleged) actions in the strongest possible terms”. “The charges against Daniel Menelaou are abhorrent, appalling, and completely contrary to everything we stand for,” the spokesman said. The spokesman said Mr Menelaou was initially put on administrative leave after his arrest but his position was terminated once the church became aware of the full extent of the charges. “Futures Church has a zero-tolerance policy regarding any form of abuse,” the spokesman said. “We regularly review our policies and safeguards to ensure we continue upholding the highest standards of child protection”.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50992
Adelaide Futures church youth pastor Daniel Menelaou arrested, charged in the US over child abuse material
A youth pastor at one of Adelaide’s biggest churches is facing charges in the US after allegedly sharing sexually explicit videos featuring children.
Natalie Vikhrov - March 17, 2025
A married Adelaide youth pastor from one of the city’s biggest churches has been arrested in the US over videos allegedly depicting child abuse.
Daniel Menelaou, 28, was arrested in the US state of Georgia following a tip-off that alleged he had been sharing sexually explicit videos featuring children.
Mr Menelaou was charged last Wednesday with possession or control of any material depicting a minor in sexually explicit conduct.
The messages were allegedly shared through a messaging app, with authorities seizing a number of electronic devices from the South Australian man after they started investigating a cyber tip-off.
Mr Menelaou’s Instagram and Facebook accounts have been disabled.
According to his LinkedIn, he served as a youth pastor at the Paradise-based Futures Church – formerly Influencers Church.
He relocated to Georgia, where he was working in a similar role at Futures’ megachurch campus at Alpharetta.
He was involved with Young Adults Alpharetta and less than a month before his arrest was featured on its Instagram account promoting a young adult service.
A spokesman for Futures Church said they were “horrified” by the charges and “categorically condemn these (alleged) actions in the strongest possible terms”.
“The charges against Daniel Menelaou are abhorrent, appalling, and completely contrary to everything we stand for,” the spokesman said.
The spokesman said Mr Menelaou was initially put on administrative leave after his arrest but his position was terminated once the church became aware of the full extent of the charges.
“Futures Church has a zero-tolerance policy regarding any form of abuse,” the spokesman said.
“We regularly review our policies and safeguards to ensure we continue upholding the highest standards of child protection”.
Mr Menelaou’s father John had been serving on the church board but has taken “indefinite” leave, the spokesman said.
“John has been an exemplary board member, and as the situation was discovered, he offered his resignation,” he said.
“While his resignation was not accepted, in recognition of the crisis his family is facing, a leave of absence was provided. This is indefinite.”
The spokesperson said Daniel Menelaou’s wife was “one of the victims in this crisis” and “out of respect for her dignity and privacy, we will not be making any further comment”.
“The church remains committed to supporting those affected.”
The church distanced itself from Mr Menelaou, saying it “is in no way responsible or affiliated with these (alleged) actions of Daniel Menelaou” and had no prior knowledge of any allegations or indication of wrongdoing until his arrest.
The church emailed its members on Monday morning about the charges, saying it was deeply “shocked, grieved and blindsided by the news”.
Known as Influencers until 2022, Futures is the state’s largest megachurch, with seven campuses across South Australia as well as five locations in the US, including Alpharetta.
https://www.adelaidenow.com.au/news/south-australia/adelaide-futures-church-youth-pastor-daniel-menelaou-arrested-charged-in-the-us-over-child-abuse-material/news-story/b0a86b06ca79d74c6beaa799e97778e7
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50994
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22779968 (180836ZMAR25) Notable: Richard Marles admits lite-on sub refit on the cards - Richard Marles has conceded the government is considering scaling back life-extending upgrades of the navy’s Collins-class submarines in a bombshell admission that raises the prospect of a widening capability gap before the nation’s nuclear subs are delivered. The Defence Minister said the government would be “managing” the scope of the life-of-type extension works to ensure the two-year overhauls could go ahead from next year. The statement followed an exclusive report by The Australian revealing government-owned submarine builder ASC had failed to complete the necessary design work for the first of the overhauls from next year. Multiple sources said the planned “LOTE lite” upgrades would leave the first boat in line, the 27-year-old HMAS Farncomb, with its main motor, diesel engines and generators in place, rather than having installed new ones as planned. Mr Marles said the current plan was to do a full 10-year upgrade but argued it would be technically challenging and confirmed key systems on the submarines could go unreplaced.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50962
>>50983
>>50987
Richard Marles admits lite-on sub refit on the cards
BEN PACKHAM - 18 March 2025
Richard Marles has conceded the government is considering scaling back life-extending upgrades of the navy’s Collins-class submarines in a bombshell admission that raises the prospect of a widening capability gap before the nation’s nuclear subs are delivered.
The Defence Minister said the government would be “managing” the scope of the life-of-type extension works to ensure the two-year overhauls could go ahead from next year.
The statement followed an exclusive report by The Australian revealing government-owned submarine builder ASC had failed to complete the necessary design work for the first of the overhauls from next year.
Multiple sources said the planned “LOTE lite” upgrades would leave the first boat in line, the 27-year-old HMAS Farncomb, with its main motor, diesel engines and generators in place, rather than having installed new ones as planned.
Mr Marles said the current plan was to do a full 10-year upgrade but argued it would be technically challenging and confirmed key systems on the submarines could go unreplaced.
“As we do the life type extensions on the Collins-class submarines, we need to be managing what new equipment we put on to the submarines with making sure that submarines are out the door, as it were, in a timely way, so that we have the availability of those submarines,” he said.
“And that management of putting capability on but also making sure that submarines are available for operation has always been a tension which just needs to be managed.
“But going forward the pressure on that is really going to be significant, and we’ll have to be really smart in the way in which we do that.”
The original LOTE plan was to cut open the subs and replace all of their key systems including the motor, engines, generators, switchboards and command and control systems, giving the boats an extra decade of operational service.
Failing to replace key systems will undermine the boats’ reliability and shorten their planned lifespans.
But despite warnings the submarines will be significantly handicapped if the refits are scaled back, Mr Marles said fears of a capability gap were overblown.
“As long as we see an evolving capability, we don’t have a capability gap,” he said.
“And so I am confident we can get there, but I’m not sanguine about the challenge in front of us.”
The uncertainty over the LOTE program follows a high-level warning to the government, revealed by The Australian last year, over ASC’s ability to deliver the complex upgrades.
Former US navy deputy assistant secretary Gloria Valdez told the government in her classified report that the scale of the planned life extensions had never been attempted, and expressed concern that ASC lacked the design and engineering experience to undertake the work.
The government maintains the Collins boats are the world’s most capable diesel-electric submarines, but there have been growing questions over their reliability.
The Australian revealed last November that only one of the six boats was operational, amid maintenance delays, corrosion problems and long-running industrial action at ASC.
The government listed the Collins as a “project of concern” the following month, triggering closer ministerial oversight of the maintenance schedule and the LOTE plans.
https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/defence/marles-admits-liteon-sub-refit-on-the-cards/news-story/e80d5956e0933962b4f15d79f24f79d8
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50995
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22779979 (180842ZMAR25) Notable: Video: Deputy Prime Minister Richard Marles shoots down Malcolm Turnbull’s criticism of AUKUS, calls it ‘a good deal’ - Richard Marles has shot down suggestions that AUKUS is a “really bad deal” that is in trouble after the reemergence of Donald Trump in the White House. Speaking in Perth on Tuesday, the Deputy Prime Minister said there were no indications from the Trump administration that the AUKUS deal was on the rocks. “If you look at all that has been said in relation to AUKUS across three countries, all of which have changed their government since the time that AUKUS was announced, there is only positive comment about AUKUS and a commitment to pursue AUKUS,” Mr Marles said. Former prime minister Malcolm Turnbull said this week that there was “no guarantee” Australia would get any nuclear-powered submarines next decade because the US was failing to keep up with its own domestic demand. “The most likely outcome of the AUKUS pillar one is that we will end up with no submarines of our own,” he said. Mr Marles dismissed Mr Turnbull’s comments. “Respectfully, I disagree with Malcolm Turnbull,” he said. “And it’s not a surprise to hear those words from Malcolm Turnbull. One thing is, he (Mr Turnbull) has been consistent about this from the moment we announced the optimal pathway back in March 2023. But Malcolm Turnbull will say what he says. This is a fundamentally critical moment for Australia. Because what this does is gives us an evolving capability in terms of our long range submarine capability which for a country like Australia is profoundly important.”
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50962
>>50988
>>50805
Deputy Prime Minister Richard Marles shoots down Malcolm Turnbull’s criticism of AUKUS, calls it ‘a good deal’
Joe Spagnolo - 18 March 2025
Richard Marles has shot down suggestions that AUKUS is a “really bad deal” that is in trouble after the reemergence of Donald Trump in the White House.
Speaking in Perth on Tuesday, the Deputy Prime Minister said there were no indications from the Trump administration that the AUKUS deal was on the rocks.
“If you look at all that has been said in relation to AUKUS across three countries, all of which have changed their government since the time that AUKUS was announced, there is only positive comment about AUKUS and a commitment to pursue AUKUS,” Mr Marles said.
“When I met with my counterpart, Secretary of Defence Pete Hegseth, his comments were entirely positive about the future of AUKUS and the engagement of the Trump administration in respect of AUKUS.
“And that makes sense because that is a really good deal for all three countries that are involved.”
With the return of the unpredictable Donald Trump to the US presidency, there are uncertainties over whether the $366 billion deal — which would see Washington selling three to five Virginia Class submarines to Canberra over the next decade — will actually happen.
But not everyone agrees with Mr Marles’ view that AUKUS is “good deal for Australia”.
Former prime minister Malcolm Turnbull said this week that there was “no guarantee” Australia would get any nuclear-powered submarines next decade because the US was failing to keep up with its own domestic demand.
“The most likely outcome of the AUKUS pillar one is that we will end up with no submarines of our own,” he said.
“There will be Australian sailors serving on US submarines and we’ll provide them with a base in WA.
“We will have lost sovereignty and security and a lot of money as well.
“That’s why I say it’s a really bad deal.”
Mr Marles dismissed Mr Turnbull’s comments.
“Respectfully, I disagree with Malcolm Turnbull,” he said.
“And it’s not a surprise to hear those words from Malcolm Turnbull.
“One thing is, he (Mr Turnbull) has been consistent about this from the moment we announced the optimal pathway back in March 2023.
“But Malcolm Turnbull will say what he says.
“This is a fundamentally critical moment for Australia. It is a critical deal for Australia.
“Because what this does is gives us an evolving capability in terms of our long range submarine capability which for a country like Australia is profoundly important.”
AUKUS will result in significant spin-offs for WA. It will be responsible for all nuclear-powered submarine maintenance in Australia.
The Albanese Government announced in 2024 that it would establish a “consolidated defence precinct” at the Henderson shipyard.
The Henderson defence precinct would be home to “depot-level maintenance and contingency docking” for nuclear-powered submarines.
The shipyard and port complex was worth up to $20 billion and provide up to 10,000 jobs.
Mr Marles would not give any timelines for the WA project.
“I’m not going to go into years now, but we need to be developing a capability there which enables us to do the maintenance of submarine,” he said.
Just before the State election, WA Defence Industry Minister Paul Papalia announced five WA businesses would work with the world’s largest nuclear-powered submarine manufacturer H11 to become an industry supplier in Australia and around the world.
One of the businesses was Veem in Canning Vale, which Mr Marles visited on Tuesday.
https://thewest.com.au/politics/federal-politics/deputy-prime-minister-richard-marles-shoots-down-malcom-turnbulls-criticism-of-aukus-calls-it-a-good-deal-c-18074560
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qQjMfKUTbxk
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50996
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22779996 (180849ZMAR25) Notable: Melbourne residents receive letter offering $200k for information on Hong Kong pro-democracy activist - A small number of Melbourne residents have received anonymous letters purporting to offer a police bounty of $203,000 if they inform on Kevin Yam, an Australian citizen and pro-democracy activist wanted for alleged national security crimes in Hong Kong, linking him to two nearby locations. A spokesperson for the foreign affairs minister, Penny Wong, told Guardian Australia the letter was “deeply worrying” and that the matter would be raised directly with officials from China and Hong Kong. The anonymous letter - mailed from Hong Kong and delivered to some Melbourne homes on Friday – contained a photograph of Yam with a headline alleging he was a “wanted person”. It then detailed a range of alleged “national security related offences” and offered HK$1m (A$203,000) from the Hong Kong police to anyone who provided information on his whereabouts or took him to Hong Kong or Australian police. Yam is a lawyer who lived in Hong Kong for 20 years before returning to Australia in 2022. He is one of eight overseas-based activists, the subject of Hong Kong police arrest warrants, accused in July 2023 of breaching its controversial national security law that grants authorities sweeping extraterritorial powers to prosecute acts or comments made anywhere in the world that it deems criminal. Yam has criticised the crackdown on dissent and erosion of judicial independence in the Chinese-controlled city and has been accused of encouraging foreign governments to impose sanctions against members of the judiciary, prosecutors and government officials. It is not known who sent the letter but its language matches a public appeals notice published on the Hong Kong police force’s official website. A UK phone number included at the bottom of the letter has also been linked to the Hong Kong police force, which was contacted for comment. The letter, which gives a detailed account of Yam’s physical appearance, listed a residential address in the Melbourne suburb of Abbotsford and another in the Melbourne CBD. The letter was sent to homes adjacent to these locations.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Melbourne residents receive letter offering $200k for information on Hong Kong pro-democracy activist
Exclusive: The anonymous ‘wanted’ letter contained a photograph of Kevin Yam, a lawyer who has criticised the crackdown on dissent in the territory
Henry Belot - 18 Mar 2025
1/2
A small number of Melbourne residents have received anonymous letters purporting to offer a police bounty of $203,000 if they inform on Kevin Yam, an Australian citizen and pro-democracy activist wanted for alleged national security crimes in Hong Kong, linking him to two nearby locations.
A spokesperson for the foreign affairs minister, Penny Wong, told Guardian Australia the letter was “deeply worrying” and that the matter would be raised directly with officials from China and Hong Kong.
The anonymous letter – mailed from Hong Kong and delivered to some Melbourne homes on Friday – contained a photograph of Yam with a headline alleging he was a “wanted person”. It then detailed a range of alleged “national security related offences” and offered HK$1m (A$203,000) from the Hong Kong police to anyone who provided information on his whereabouts or took him to Hong Kong or Australian police.
Yam is a lawyer who lived in Hong Kong for 20 years before returning to Australia in 2022. He is one of eight overseas-based activists, the subject of Hong Kong police arrest warrants, accused in July 2023 of breaching its controversial national security law that grants authorities sweeping extraterritorial powers to prosecute acts or comments made anywhere in the world that it deems criminal.
Yam has criticised the crackdown on dissent and erosion of judicial independence in the Chinese-controlled city and has been accused of encouraging foreign governments to impose sanctions against members of the judiciary, prosecutors and government officials.
It is not known who sent the letter but its language matches a public appeals notice published on the Hong Kong police force’s official website. A UK phone number included at the bottom of the letter has also been linked to the Hong Kong police force, which was contacted for comment.
The letter, which gives a detailed account of Yam’s physical appearance, listed a residential address in the Melbourne suburb of Abbotsford and another in the Melbourne CBD. The letter was sent to homes adjacent to these locations.
“A reward of $1m HKD is being offered by Hong Kong police to any member of the public who can provide information on this wanted person and the related crime or take him to Hong Kong and Australian metropolitan police,” the letter claimed.
The letter urged people with information on Yam’s whereabouts to contact Hong Kong police force’s national security department. It also noted Hong Kong’s secretary for security, Tang Ping-keung, declared Yam an “absconder in respect of offences endangering national security” on 24 December 2024.
Similar letters with the exact formatting were mailed to neighbours of former Hong Kong district councillor Carmen Lau, who lives in the UK, earlier this month. Lau told NBC News she did not “feel safe living at my current address” as a result.
Wong’s spokesperson said the targeting of an Australian citizen was “completely unacceptable”.
“The Australian government will not tolerate surveillance, harassment or intimidation against individuals or family members here in Australia – this undermines our national sovereignty and the security and safety of Australians,” the spokesperson said.
“We are raising our concerns directly with Chinese and Hong Kong authorities.”
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50997
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22780011 (180857ZMAR25) Notable: Fake pamphlets accusing former Hong Kong legislator of being a pro-Israel lawyer sent to Adelaide mosques - Fake pamphlets falsely accusing a former Hong Kong politician and Australian resident, Ted Hui, of being an pro-Israel lawyer willing to “wage war” against Islamic terrorism were allegedly mailed to mosques in Adelaide in an apparent attempt to intimidate him and undermine social cohesion. The pamphlets, which carry images of Hui and the name and contact details of his Adelaide law firm, have alarmed the Australian government, which will raise the matter with Chinese officials. It is not known who sent the pamphlets. Hui is a former pro-democracy legislator who fled to Australia via Europe in 2019. In 2022 he was convicted in absentia for his role in pro-democracy protests during 2019 and sentenced to three and a half years in jail. Hong Kong authorities have accused Hui of “foreign collusion” in social media posts seeking international support for Hong Kong under its national security law. Hui said he had been contacted by representatives from unnamed government departments about the false pamphlets and had been assured the matter was being taken seriously. The pamphlet falsely quotes Hui as saying “I am a pro-Jewish man and siding with Israel to wage war against those Islamic terrorism [sic]”. It also states that Hui can “provide assistance to local Jews”. “Those pamphlets were sent to a few mosques in Adelaide,” Hui told Guardian Australia. “I understand it is not large scale, they were only sent to a few mosques.” Hui said the government representative he had spoken to said the pamphlet had been sent from Macau, a special administrative region of China. “They are trying to make trouble for me,” Hui said. “It can be quite terrifying, at the beginning, knowing that they know where I work.” Hui said the pamphlet’s claims were “totally incorrect”. “I have not spoken a word in public about the Israel-Palestinian war,” Hui said. “They have made a fake profile of me and are using it to stir conflict and tensions in Adelaide, among ethnic communities.”
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50996
Fake pamphlets accusing former Hong Kong legislator of being a pro-Israel lawyer sent to Adelaide mosques
Exclusive: Lawyer Ted Hui says leaflet’s claims are ‘totally incorrect’ as Australian authorities raise concerns with China
Henry Belot - 18 Mar 2025
Fake pamphlets falsely accusing a former Hong Kong politician and Australian resident, Ted Hui, of being an pro-Israel lawyer willing to “wage war” against Islamic terrorism were allegedly mailed to mosques in Adelaide in an apparent attempt to intimidate him and undermine social cohesion.
The pamphlets, which carry images of Hui and the name and contact details of his Adelaide law firm, have alarmed the Australian government, which will raise the matter with Chinese officials. It is not known who sent the pamphlets.
Hui is a former pro-democracy legislator who fled to Australia via Europe in 2019. In 2022 he was convicted in absentia for his role in pro-democracy protests during 2019 and sentenced to three and a half years in jail.
Hong Kong authorities have accused Hui of “foreign collusion” in social media posts seeking international support for Hong Kong under its national security law.
Hui said he had been contacted by representatives from unnamed government departments about the false pamphlets and had been assured the matter was being taken seriously.
The pamphlet falsely quotes Hui as saying “I am a pro-Jewish man and siding with Israel to wage war against those Islamic terrorism [sic]”. It also states that Hui can “provide assistance to local Jews”.
“Those pamphlets were sent to a few mosques in Adelaide,” Hui told Guardian Australia. “I understand it is not large scale, they were only sent to a few mosques.”
Hui said the government representative he had spoken to said the pamphlet had been sent from Macau, a special administrative region of China.
“They are trying to make trouble for me,” Hui said. “It can be quite terrifying, at the beginning, knowing that they know where I work.”
Hui said the pamphlet’s claims were “totally incorrect”.
“I have not spoken a word in public about the Israel-Palestinian war,” Hui said. “They have made a fake profile of me and are using it to stir conflict and tensions in Adelaide, among ethnic communities.”
The Chinese government has been contacted for comment.
On Monday Guardian Australia revealed that Melbourne homes had received anonymous letters purporting to offer a police bounty of $203,000 for information about an Australian citizen and pro-democracy activist, Kevin Yam, who is wanted for alleged national security crimes in Hong Kong.
The foreign affairs minister, Penny Wong, is alarmed by both the letter to Yam and the pamphlet targeting Hui.
“We are a sovereign nation,” Wong said. “We do not accept any one of our citizens or on our shores, people being bullied or harassed or threatened by a foreign power.
“We expect our democracy and our citizens to be able to operate free from such interference, that kind of pressure or threats. And we have and will make representations very clearly.”
Government sources have confirmed the pamphlet targeting Hui will be raised with Chinese officials.
The attorney general, the Australian federal police and the domestic spy agency have been contacted for comment.
The shadow home affairs minister, James Paterson, said the pamphlet appeared to be “a crude attempt to weaponise antisemitism for the purposes of foreign interference”.
“It must be investigated for potential breaches of the law,” Paterson told Guardian Australia. “If those responsible can be identified, serious penalties must follow to send the strong message that Australia jealously defends the rights of residents like Ted Hui to exercise freedom of speech.
“If a foreign government is ultimately responsible, it is an even more grotesque attempt to undermine social cohesion in Australia and would warrant a firm response.”
In July 2023 China’s foreign ministry spokesperson Mao Ning urged Australia, the UK and the US to stop sheltering activists subject to arrest warrants in Hong Kong.
“Relevant countries need to respect China’s sovereignty and the rule of law in Hong Kong, stop lending support for anti-China elements destabilising Hong Kong, and stop providing a safe haven for fugitives,” she said.
https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2025/mar/18/ted-hui-adelaide-mosques-fake-pamphlets-israel-war-claims-ntwnfb
https://qresear.ch/?q=Ted+Hui
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50998
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22780038 (180917ZMAR25) Notable: Melbourne residents receive 'wanted' letter for Hong Kong pro-democracy activist - The federal government has lodged diplomatic protests with China after two prominent Hong Kong activists in Australia were targeted in what appear to be coordinated intimidation campaigns. Both former Hong Kong politician and Australian resident Ted Hui, who lives in Adelaide, and prominent Hong Kong pro-democracy advocate and Australian citizen Kevin Yam have been fiercely critical of the crackdown on the dissent in the Chinese city-state. In 2024, Hong Kong authorities placed a "bounty" on the heads of both men as part of its increasingly ambitious attempts to target critics living abroad. Last week, a letter was sent to some Melbourne addresses with a picture of Mr Yam, an experienced lawyer who has been a vocal critic of the crackdown on political dissent and judicial independence in Hong Kong. Separately, a pamphlet was sent to Adelaide mosques misrepresenting Mr Hui as a pro-Israel lawyer who wants to "wage war" against “Islamic terrorism.” The letter with Mr Ya’s picture appears almost identical to one that was sent to people living near former Hong Kong politician Carmen Lau in the United Kingdom, drawing fierce criticism from British politicians. The letter appears almost identical to one that was sent to people living near former Hong Kong politician Carmen Lau in the United Kingdom, drawing fierce criticism from British politicians. The Australian government has repeatedly said the charges against Mr Yam and Mr Hui are baseless. It’s not clear exactly who sent either of the pamphlets, but Foreign Minister Penny Wong said Australian officials had made "very clear" representations to Chinese and Hong Kong officials. "We are a sovereign nation. We do not accept any one of our citizens or on our shores, people being bullied or harassed or threatened by a foreign power," she said. "We expect our democracy and our citizens to be able to operate free from such interference, that kind of pressure or threats."
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50996
>>50997
Melbourne residents receive 'wanted' letter for Hong Kong pro-democracy activist
Stephen Dziedzic and Bang Xiao - 18 March 2025
1/2
The federal government has lodged diplomatic protests with China after two prominent Hong Kong activists in Australia were targeted in what appear to be coordinated intimidation campaigns.
Both former Hong Kong politician and Australian resident Ted Hui, who lives in Adelaide, and prominent Hong Kong pro-democracy advocate and Australian citizen Kevin Yam have been fiercely critical of the crackdown on the dissent in the Chinese city-state.
In 2024, Hong Kong authorities placed a "bounty" on the heads of both men as part of its increasingly ambitious attempts to target critics living abroad.
Last week, a letter was sent to some Melbourne addresses with a picture of Mr Yam, an experienced lawyer who has been a vocal critic of the crackdown on political dissent and judicial independence in Hong Kong.
Separately, a pamphlet was sent to Adelaide mosques misrepresenting Mr Hui as a pro-Israel lawyer who wants to "wage war" against “Islamic terrorism.”
The letter with Mr Ya’s picture appears almost identical to one that was sent to people living near former Hong Kong politician Carmen Lau in the United Kingdom, drawing fierce criticism from British politicians.
The letter appears almost identical to one that was sent to people living near former Hong Kong politician Carmen Lau in the United Kingdom, drawing fierce criticism from British politicians.
'We do not accept' harassment and threats, Wong says
The Australian government has repeatedly said the charges against Mr Yam and Mr Hui are baseless.
It’s not clear exactly who sent either of the pamphlets, but Foreign Minister Penny Wong said Australian officials had made "very clear" representations to Chinese and Hong Kong officials.
"We are a sovereign nation. We do not accept any one of our citizens or on our shores, people being bullied or harassed or threatened by a foreign power," she said.
"We expect our democracy and our citizens to be able to operate free from such interference, that kind of pressure or threats."
Shadow Home Affairs Minister James Paterson said the harassment of both men was "completely unacceptable and illegal."
"It is extremely reckless to seek to weaponise antisemitism and undermine Australia’s social cohesion to facilitate foreign interference," he said.
"These flyers targeting Kevin Yam and Ted Hui must be investigated, and if the perpetrators are located in Australia, punished to the full extent of the law."
"If a foreign government is ultimately responsible, the strongest representations must be made to send the clear message this meddling in our country will not be tolerated."
The pamphlet sent to mosques includes the address and phone number of Mr Hui’s law firm in Adelaide.
Hui says letter 'a fabrication'
Mr Hui told the ABC that the letter was a fabrication and misrepresented his position on the war in Gaza, which he described as a "complicated issue."
He said federal government officials had told him the letter appeared to have been sent from Macau in China.
The incident left him "terrified", he said.
"It's trying to silence us so that we don't speak anymore," he said.
He also said the pamphlets targeting both him and Kevin Yam were not a "single incident" and it was "reasonable" to assume the campaign was directed by the Chinese government.
"This is a new measure, or new strategy, applying over us," he said.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.50999
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22800991 (212213ZMAR25) Notable: Video: Chinese social media platform RedNote fuels misinformation concerns in Australian election- A series of attacks on Australian political parties on emerging Chinese social media platform RedNote (RED), has raised concerns about misinformation, disinformation and the risk of foreign interference ahead of the federal election. Among the most notable is an AI-generated deepfake video of Opposition Leader Peter Dutton, falsely depicting him speaking Mandarin, and a misleadingly edited video suggesting he intends to deport Chinese Australians. The Albanese government has also been targeted, including with posts showing people being arrested in shopping centres, accompanied by the false claim that Australian police are arresting temporary migrants. The vertical video platform, also known by its Chinese name Xiaohongshu, which means "little red book", was designed for lifestyle content and e-commerce and has expanded rapidly, now attracting over 700,000 monthly users in Australia. Analysts say its increasing influence and unique algorithm that makes it easy to share misinformation make it a key platform to watch in the lead-up to the election. However, the Australian Electoral Commission (AEC) is not monitoring the platform for misleading or deceptive content. A dossier of attacks on Australian political parties has been compiled by the RECapture project, an initiative of several Victorian universities that analyses how Australia is portrayed across Chinese social media services. Between November and February, its researchers found misleading content on RED targeting both major parties as well as independent candidates. Peter Dutton has been one of the main targets of attacks, with misleading claims circulating about his policies on nuclear energy, immigration, housing and health care.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50708
>>50755
>>50958
Chinese social media platform RedNote fuels misinformation concerns in Australian election
Echo Hui - 20 March 2025
1/3
A series of attacks on Australian political parties on emerging Chinese social media platform RedNote (RED), has raised concerns about misinformation, disinformation and the risk of foreign interference ahead of the federal election.
Among the most notable is an AI-generated deepfake video of Opposition Leader Peter Dutton, falsely depicting him speaking Mandarin, and a misleadingly edited video suggesting he intends to deport Chinese Australians.
The Albanese government has also been targeted, including with posts showing people being arrested in shopping centres, accompanied by the false claim that Australian police are arresting temporary migrants.
The vertical video platform, also known by its Chinese name Xiaohongshu, which means "little red book", was designed for lifestyle content and e-commerce and has expanded rapidly, now attracting over 700,000 monthly users in Australia.
Analysts say its increasing influence and unique algorithm that makes it easy to share misinformation make it a key platform to watch in the lead-up to the election.
However, the Australian Electoral Commission (AEC) is not monitoring the platform for misleading or deceptive content.
A new political battleground
A dossier of attacks on Australian political parties has been compiled by the RECapture project, an initiative of several Victorian universities that analyses how Australia is portrayed across Chinese social media services.
Between November and February, its researchers found misleading content on RED targeting both major parties as well as independent candidates.
Peter Dutton has been one of the main targets of attacks, with misleading claims circulating about his policies on nuclear energy, immigration, housing and health care.
The ABC has also discovered additional posts.
They include one video clip based on an interview Mr Dutton gave explaining his policy to not display Indigenous flags alongside the Australian flag at press conferences.
"We are a country united under one flag. If we are asking people to identify under different flags, no other country does that," Mr Dutton said in the interview.
But the AI-generated clip on RED portrayed Mr Dutton speaking in fluent Mandarin — with his own voice.
It added the false commentary: "Peter Dutton vows to abolish the Aboriginal flag if he's elected."
Another post discovered by the ABC falsely claimed Mr Dutton had compared international students to "modern-day refugees who stow away on boats".
Yet another post falsely alleged that Mr Dutton "told Chinese Australians to leave the country", heavily distorting a speech he gave last year.
The original speech was criticising participants in an anti-Israel protest at the Sydney Opera House in 2023.
"My message to this recalcitrant minority is simple. You will not change us. If you do not subscribe to the Australian way of life, leave this country," the opposition leader said in the speech, delivered in April 2024.
However, the post on RED misleadingly suggested that Mr Dutton was talking about Chinese migrants, who he planned to deport if elected.
The person who posted the video commented on the post, claiming it meant: "If Australian Chinese don't assimilate and become 'bananas', they risk being expelled from Australia soon."
"Banana" is a racial slur aimed at Asian people, implying that they are yellow (Asian) on the outside but white on the inside.
The ABC has identified the poster as a mortgage broker based between China and Sydney.
He did not respond to questions about why he was posting misleading claims about Mr Dutton.
In other examples of misinformation, a scare campaign targeting Mr Dutton's Medicare policies, promoted by Labor and reported by the ABC, has also continued to spread on RED.
Labor has attacked Mr Dutton's Medicare record in official campaign ads authorised by Health Minister Mark Butler and Foreign Minister Penny Wong.
However, unauthorised versions of these political posts have spread on RED without proper disclosure.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.51000
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22801080 (212236ZMAR25) Notable: OPINION: I have a price on my head. I hope my neighbours won’t try to cash in - "This week, letters arrived at homes in Melbourne offering a $200,000 bounty on my head. I’m an Australian citizen who worked as a lawyer in Hong Kong for 20 years before returning to Australia in 2022. The bounty was placed by the Hong Kong government for my advocacy for Hong Kong democracy, which the letters characterise as threats to China’s “national security”. The anonymous letters, sent from Hong Kong, landed in the mailboxes of residents of a quiet Melbourne suburb. “Kevin is wanted on suspicion of a range of national security-related offences. “A reward of one million Hong Kong dollars [$200,000] is being offered by the Hong Kong police to any member of the public who can provide information on this wanted person and the related crime or take him to Hong Kong or Australia Metropolitan Police.” In short, the letters call for me to be kidnapped. It also emerged this week that Adelaide lawyer and former Hong Kong pro-democracy politician Ted Hui, who has the same bounty over his head, has been the subject of a more elaborate plot. Fake pamphlets with his contact details were sent to mosques in Adelaide claiming Hui was a “pro-Jewish man siding with Israel to wage war against those Islamic terrorism [sic]”. It is clearly an attempt to provoke intimidation or harm towards Hui based on both Islamophobic and antisemitic stereotypes. Who did this to us? Given the letters about me contained official Hong Kong police contact details, my conclusion is these were acts either of the Chinese or Hong Kong authorities, or parties that operate with their explicit or tacit approval. The latest threats against Hui and me have also arisen against the backdrop of an upcoming federal election. Both Labor and the Coalition have in recent months adopted China-friendly rhetoric as part of their efforts to woo ethnically Chinese voters in marginal seats. The plight of both me and Hui shows that being China-friendly and being ethnically Chinese-friendly should be kept distinct. Our experience shows that China can definitely be hostile to ethnic Chinese in Australia if they are critical of the Chinese Communist Party. Further, as much as Australia might seek to shower China with love, China has shown that it will not reciprocate. Instead, it continues to act like an authoritarian bully that will disregard Australia’s sovereignty, democracy, and social cohesion for as long as the Chinese Communist Party remains in power." - Kevin Yam, Australian citizen, Hong Kong democracy activist and PhD candidate at Melbourne Law School - smh.com.au
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50996
>>50997
>>50998
OPINION: I have a price on my head. I hope my neighbours won’t try to cash in
Kevin Yam, Democracy activist - March 20, 2025
1/2
This week, letters arrived at homes in Melbourne offering a $200,000 bounty on my head.
I’m an Australian citizen who worked as a lawyer in Hong Kong for 20 years before returning to Australia in 2022. The bounty was placed by the Hong Kong government for my advocacy for Hong Kong democracy, which the letters characterise as threats to China’s “national security”.
The anonymous letters, sent from Hong Kong, landed in the mailboxes of residents of a quiet Melbourne suburb. “Kevin is wanted on suspicion of a range of national security-related offences.
“A reward of one million Hong Kong dollars [$200,000] is being offered by the Hong Kong police to any member of the public who can provide information on this wanted person and the related crime or take him to Hong Kong or Australia Metropolitan Police.”
In short, the letters call for me to be kidnapped.
It also emerged this week that Adelaide lawyer and former Hong Kong pro-democracy politician Ted Hui, who has the same bounty over his head, has been the subject of a more elaborate plot. Fake pamphlets with his contact details were sent to mosques in Adelaide claiming Hui was a “pro-Jewish man siding with Israel to wage war against those Islamic terrorism [sic]”. It is clearly an attempt to provoke intimidation or harm towards Hui based on both Islamophobic and antisemitic stereotypes.
Who did this to us? Given the letters about me contained official Hong Kong police contact details, my conclusion is these were acts either of the Chinese or Hong Kong authorities, or parties that operate with their explicit or tacit approval.
The Australian government has reacted strongly against these threats to Hui and me, condemning them and promising to raise them directly with China. This was echoed by the federal opposition, which demanded an investigation into who was responsible. Such responses are reassuring for me and for Hui, as they show that threats against us are being taken seriously.
It is also important for Australia’s national interest for strong bipartisan responses to these crimes. The bringing of threats to Australian shores demonstrates China’s disregard for Australia’s legal sovereignty. They are even closer to home than the Chinese navy’s recent incursions into Australia’s exclusive economic zone.
As this masthead has reported, a flotilla of Chinese ships from the People’s Liberation Army Navy spent three weeks prowling the waters off the Australian east coast, conducting surprise back-to-back live-fire exercises in busy air traffic space in the Tasman Sea. We can expect more of this as the Chinese military seeks to project its strength far from its shores.
The threats also show China’s nefarious willingness to stoop to exploiting perceived fissures in multicultural Australia’s social fabric for its own transnational repression purposes.
The latest threats against Hui and me have also arisen against the backdrop of an upcoming federal election. Both Labor and the Coalition have in recent months adopted China-friendly rhetoric as part of their efforts to woo ethnically Chinese voters in marginal seats.
Chinese Australians will be crucial to the outcome in seats such as Menzies, which takes in the Melbourne suburb of Box Hill. They comprise 16.5 per cent of voters in that electorate, which swung heavily against the Morrison government in 2022, following its aggressive rhetoric against the Chinese Communist Party.
However, the seat’s margin has halved for the coming election after the Australian Electoral Commission abolished the neighbouring seat of Higgins.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.51001
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22837325 (290815ZMAR25) Notable: Video: US authorities to fly to Sydney following arrest of alleged Ukrainian hacker Andrii Diuhovskyi - US Secret Service agents are on their way to Sydney, hoping to take an alleged computer hacker who was arrested in Australia back to America. Ukrainian national Andrii Diuhovskyi remains behind bars after Australian Federal Police acted on an international arrest warrant and detained him on Tuesday. Diuhovskyi faced court via video link from Surry Hills Police Station on Wednesday, where the matter was adjourned. The Federal Attorney General’s office confirmed to 7NEWS that he is wanted for conspiracy to commit computer instructions, unauthorised access to a protected computer, and aiding and abetting and conspiracy to commit wire fraud. Before being led away, Diuhovskyi asked the Magistrate whether he was going to be taken to a jail in the United States. She confirmed he would not be yet. His matter will return to court in two weeks. If found guilty, he could face two decades in jail in the United States. The US embassy was sought for comment.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Andrii Diuhovskyi: US authorities to fly to Sydney following arrest of alleged Ukrainian hacker
The Ukrainian national had one question for the Magistrate as he faced court on Wednesday.
Tim Lester and Bryce Luff - 26 March 2025
US Secret Service agents are on their way to Sydney, hoping to take an alleged computer hacker who was arrested in Australia back to America.
Ukrainian national Andrii Diuhovskyi remains behind bars after Australian Federal Police acted on an international arrest warrant and detained him on Tuesday.
Diuhovskyi faced court via video link from Surry Hills Police Station on Wednesday, where the matter was adjourned.
The Federal Attorney General’s office confirmed to 7NEWS that he is wanted for conspiracy to commit computer instructions, unauthorised access to a protected computer, and aiding and abetting and conspiracy to commit wire fraud.
Before being led away, Diuhovskyi asked the Magistrate whether he was going to be taken to a jail in the United States.
She confirmed he would not be yet.
His matter will return to court in two weeks.
If found guilty, he could face two decades in jail in the United States.
The US embassy was sought for comment.
https://7news.com.au/news/andrii-diuhovskyi-us-authorities-to-fly-to-sydney-following-arrest-of-alleged-ukrainian-hacker-c-18168291
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.51002
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22837469 (291004ZMAR25) Notable: Video: Ben Roberts-Smith in eleventh-hour bid to reopen his appeal after secret recordings of Nine journalist Nick McKenzie - Ben Roberts-Smith has launched an eleventh-hour bid to clear his name after secret recordings caught Nine journalist Nick McKenzie claiming he had been briefed on some of the war veteran’s legal strategy during his defamation case. Lawyers for the former SAS soldier filed an interlocutory application to the Federal Court on Thursday afternoon asking for leave to reopen his appeal. “In the circumstances…. the nature of the information improperly obtained and its concealment until after the conclusion of the trial and appeal, it is in the interests of justice - both as between the parties and more broadly in relation to the administration of justice - that the matter be retried,” the application from Robert-Smith’s lawyers read. Roberts-Smith’s lawyers also argued McKenzie had “engaged in wilful misconduct” by “improperly and unlawfully obtaining and retaining information concerning the appellant’s legal strategy concerning the trial that was confidential and privileged to the appellant”. The West Australian reported yesterday that the decorated soldier’s legal team had demanded an urgent explanation from lawyers for Nine and McKenzie about what other information he was privy to during the trial following the leak of the audio. The newspaper also said it was understood Roberts-Smith’s lawyers were not ruling out seeking to have McKenzie face questioning in the witness stand. The appeal comes days after Sky News revealed the star reporter was recorded telling a witness that Roberts-Smith’s ex-wife, Emma Roberts, and her friend, Danielle Scott, had provided him with some of the former soldier’s legal strategy. McKenzie told the witness - a woman he was trying to convince to give evidence for Nine - that the intelligence he had received about the soldier’s legal strategy was “helpful” in Nine’s case.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ben Roberts-Smith in eleventh-hour bid to reopen his appeal after secret recordings of Nine journalist Nick McKenzie
The decorated war veteran is fighting to clear his name after leaked audio revealed Nick McKenzie claiming to have been briefed on the soldier’s legal strategy.
Digital Staff - 27 March 2025
Ben Roberts-Smith has launched an eleventh-hour bid to clear his name after secret recordings caught Nine journalist Nick McKenzie claiming he had been briefed on some of the war veteran’s legal strategy during his defamation case.
Lawyers for the former SAS soldier filed an interlocutory application to the Federal Court on Thursday afternoon asking for leave to reopen his appeal.
“In the circumstances…. the nature of the information improperly obtained and its concealment until after the conclusion of the trial and appeal, it is in the interests of justice — both as between the parties and more broadly in relation to the administration of justice — that the matter be retried,” the application from Robert-Smith’s lawyers read.
Roberts-Smith’s lawyers also argued McKenzie had “engaged in wilful misconduct” by “improperly and unlawfully obtaining and retaining information concerning the appellant’s legal strategy concerning the trial that was confidential and privileged to the appellant”.
“The appellant was unaware of the second respondent’s misconduct until after the trial and the hearing of the appeal,” they state.
“There is at least a real possibility that, had the second respondent not engaged in such misconduct, the result of the trial would have been different...”
Roberts-Smith fought — but lost — a defamation case he brought against Nine newspapers after he was accused of committing war crimes in Afghanistan.
His appeal against the loss wrapped up about a year ago with a judgment expected to be handed down within weeks.
In a statement on Thursday afternoon Roberts-Smith said all he had ever hoped for was “a fair process”.
“My lawyers have today filed an application with the Full Court seeking leave to: rely upon additional evidence, including an audio recording in which a journalist admits to being briefed with my confidential legal strategy as well as evidence that my emails were improperly accessed over 100 times in 2020 and 2021 and; to amend my grounds of appeal to include a miscarriage of justice,” he said.
“I have continued to fight for justice throughout this process and today that fight continues.
“As a soldier I spent the majority of my adult life serving this country and putting my life on the line defending our rights as Australians.
“All I have ever asked for was a fair process where the truth and justice can prevail.”
The West Australian reported yesterday that the decorated soldier’s legal team had demanded an urgent explanation from lawyers for Nine and McKenzie about what other information he was privy to during the trial following the leak of the audio.
The newspaper also said it was understood Roberts-Smith’s lawyers were not ruling out seeking to have McKenzie face questioning in the witness stand.
The appeal comes days after Sky News revealed the star reporter was recorded telling a witness that Roberts-Smith’s ex-wife, Emma Roberts, and her friend, Danielle Scott, had provided him with some of the former soldier’s legal strategy.
McKenzie told the witness — a woman he was trying to convince to give evidence for Nine — that the intelligence he had received about the soldier’s legal strategy was “helpful” in Nine’s case.
Roberts-Smith, a Victoria Cross recipient, was waiting for the outcome of his appeal, with the decision yet to be handed down.
Nine this week said it had reviewed the audio clip with its legal counsel and said there had been no breach of legal privilege or ethical concerns.
“Nine has full confidence in the reporting and actions of Nick McKenzie, an award-winning reporter who enjoys the respect and admiration of his editors and colleagues in the newsroom,” a Nine spokesman said.
https://7news.com.au/news/ben-roberts-smith-amends-appeal-after-secret-recordings-catch-nine-journalist-nick-mckenzie-c-18179114
https://qresear.ch/?q=Ben+Roberts-Smith
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.51003
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22837474 (291006ZMAR25) Notable: Mystery witness in defamation appeal bid is Ben Roberts-Smith’s former mistress - Ben Roberts-Smith’s former mistress is the mystery witness whose secretly recorded conversation with investigative journalist Nick McKenzie has sparked an 11th-hour bid by the war veteran to reopen his defamation appeal against the Nine newspapers. Roberts-Smith, in an interlocutory application, claims there was a miscarriage of justice in his failed defamation case against The Canberra Times, The Age and The Sydney Morning Herald in light of new revelations McKenzie had allegedly obtained information relating to his legal strategy during trial. The Federal Court has responded quickly to Roberts-Smith’s application, with Justice Nye Perram - one of three judges who reserved their decision on the appeal in February last year - calling a case management hearing for Monday to “discuss the parties’ perspectives” on how to address the issues. The shock intervention comes after Sky News Australia on Monday published a recording of McKenzie in which he appears to tell Roberts-Smith’s former mistress - identified during the defamation trial as Person 17 – that he had access to part of the soldier’s legal strategy during the case. In the recording, McKenzie tells the woman that Roberts-Smith’s ex-wife, Emma Roberts, and her friend, Danielle Scott, had been “actively briefing us on his legal strategy” in respect to her. “I’ve just breached my f*cking ethics … This has put me in a shit position now,” he said.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>51002
Mystery witness in defamation appeal bid is Ben Roberts-Smith’s former mistress
STEPHEN RICE - 28 March 2025
1/2
Ben Roberts-Smith’s former mistress is the mystery witness whose secretly recorded conversation with investigative journalist Nick McKenzie has sparked an 11th-hour bid by the war veteran to reopen his defamation appeal against the Nine newspapers.
Roberts-Smith, in an interlocutory application, claims there was a miscarriage of justice in his failed defamation case against The Canberra Times, The Age and The Sydney Morning Herald in light of new revelations McKenzie had allegedly obtained information relating to his legal strategy during trial.
The Federal Court has responded quickly to Roberts-Smith’s application, with Justice Nye Perram – one of three judges who reserved their decision on the appeal in February last year – calling a case management hearing for Monday to “discuss the parties’ perspectives” on how to address the issues.
The shock intervention comes after Sky News Australia on Monday published a recording of McKenzie in which he appears to tell Roberts-Smith’s former mistress – identified during the defamation trial as Person 17 – that he had access to part of the soldier’s legal strategy during the case.
In the recording, McKenzie tells the woman that Roberts-Smith’s ex-wife, Emma Roberts, and her friend, Danielle Scott, had been “actively briefing us on his legal strategy” in respect to her.
“I’ve just breached my f*cking ethics … This has put me in a shit position now,” he said.
In another part of the recording, he said: “We anticipated most of it, one or two things now we know which is helpful but the point, the reason I told you that was to say, like, you know we’ve got this and they’re not hostile to you, despite your worst fears. They’re not.”
Nine had claimed Roberts-Smith cheated on his wife with the professional, married woman, during a wild six-month affair that allegedly ended with him punching her after she embarrassed him by getting drunk at a function in Parliament House.
However, in his judgment, Justice Anthony Besanko said he was “not satisfied Person 17’s evidence is sufficiently reliable to establish the assault occurred and that (the imputations) are substantially true”.
Person 17’s credibility was repeatedly challenged on the witness stand.
At one point during the trial, the woman claimed she was approached on a beach by a stranger and shown photos of herself and the war hero having sex up against a window in a room at the Milton Hotel in Brisbane.
The woman said the mysterious figure demanded she tell Roberts-Smith’s wife about the affair, or the photos would be made public.
Justice Besanko found that Nine had made out a defence of contextual truth on Person 17’s allegation of assault – that even though one claim might be untrue, it was outweighed by those that were substantially true. The judge found that Roberts-Smith had committed several murders of unarmed civilians.
Roberts-Smith launched an appeal against the war crimes findings on various grounds, but has now added “miscarriage of justice” with his new application.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.51004
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22837744 (291237ZMAR25) Notable: US toddler’s miraculous survival after prayers to George Pell - The miraculous recovery of an American baby boy who stopped breathing for 52 minutes after falling into a swimming pool is being credited by senior Catholic clergy to the intercession of the late cardinal George Pell. In a speech at Campion College near Parramatta on Wednesday night, Cardinal Pell’s successor as Archbishop of Sydney, Anthony Fisher, said he received a report last week about a baby, Vincent, who had just been discharged from hospital in Phoenix, Arizona. “He’s 18 months old and fell into a swimming pool,’’ Archbishop Fisher told the gathering. “He stopped breathing for 52 minutes. His parents prayed for the intercession of Cardinal Pell. “The boy survived and came off life support free of any damage to brain or lungs or heart. He’s fine now and his doctors are calling it a miracle.’’ Vincent spent about 10 days in hospital and was discharged a few days ago. His mother’s brother, a Catholic priest, contacted his friend, Father Joseph Hamilton, the Rector of Domus Australia in Rome and Pell’s former secretary, asking for prayers during his recovery. From Rome, Father Hamilton told The Australian on Thursday that the boy’s parents had prayed for the late cardinal to intercede for their son because they were impressed when they met him in Phoenix in December 2021. Pell was in the US on a book tour promoting his three-volume Prison Journal, which he handwrote during his 404-day imprisonment, largely in solitary confinement. “He said the White Mass for medical professionals in Phoenix,’’ Father Hamilton said.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>>/qresearch/22482994 (pb)
>>>/qresearch/22483006 (pb)
US toddler’s miraculous survival after prayers to George Pell
TESS LIVINGSTONE - March 27, 2025
The miraculous recovery of an American baby boy who stopped breathing for 52 minutes after falling into a swimming pool is being credited by senior Catholic clergy to the intercession of the late cardinal George Pell.
In a speech at Campion College near Parramatta on Wednesday night, Cardinal Pell’s successor as Archbishop of Sydney, Anthony Fisher, said he received a report last week about a baby, Vincent, who had just been discharged from hospital in Phoenix, Arizona.
“He’s 18 months old and fell into a swimming pool,’’ Archbishop Fisher told the gathering. “He stopped breathing for 52 minutes. His parents prayed for the intercession of Cardinal Pell.
“The boy survived and came off life support free of any damage to brain or lungs or heart. He’s fine now and his doctors are calling it a miracle.’’
Vincent spent about 10 days in hospital and was discharged a few days ago.
His mother’s brother, a Catholic priest, contacted his friend, Father Joseph Hamilton, the Rector of Domus Australia in Rome and Pell’s former secretary, asking for prayers during his recovery.
From Rome, Father Hamilton told The Australian on Thursday that the boy’s parents had prayed for the late cardinal to intercede for their son because they were impressed when they met him in Phoenix in December 2021.
Pell was in the US on a book tour promoting his three-volume Prison Journal, which he handwrote during his 404-day imprisonment, largely in solitary confinement.
“He said the White Mass for medical professionals in Phoenix,’’ Father Hamilton said.
The Catholic News Service reported that Pell told his audience that his ordeal had enabled him to understand suffering as a redemptive process that allowed people to identify closely with Christ.
“All this only makes sense if we accept in faith that suffering can be turned to a good purpose when united with Jesus’ suffering and death,” Cardinal Pell said in Phoenix.
“It is through his suffering and death while a powerless victim that the Lord redeemed us; released the grace so that our sins and the worst crimes could be forgiven.”
Pell’s fight against Vatican incompetence and financial corruption when he was prefect for the economy and his trial and conviction on charges of historic child sexual abuse in Melbourne’s St Patrick’s Cathedral, that were overturned unanimously by the High Court, sparked major interest in the US. He had a big following among Catholics in parishes and many US cardinals, bishops and priests.
Archbishop Fisher was speaking at the Australian launch of a new biography – George Cardinal Pell, Pax Invictis, published by Ignatius Press.
If the boy’s recovery were to be cited in future as one of the two miracles necessary for canonisation in the Catholic Church, that process would not normally start until after January 2028.
Consideration for canonisation normally begins at least five years after the subject’s death.
Cardinal Pell died in Rome on January 19, 2023, when he suffered a heart attack in Salvator Mundi hospital after hip-replacement surgery.
The long, complex process often takes decades or centuries.
However the late Mother Teresa died in September 1997 and was declared a saint in 2016, while the late Pope John Paul II died in April 2005 and was canonised in 2014.
Australia’s first saint, Mary of the Cross MacKillop, founder of the sisters of St Joseph, died in August 1909 and was declared a saint by Pope Benedict in October 2010.
The Dicastery for the Causes of Saints closely scrutinises all candidates nominated for beatification and sainthood, assessing their lives for “heroic virtue’’.
It also assesses any miracles attributed to them, drawing on the expertise of several members of a team of 60 doctors and medical specialists.
Tess Livingstone is the author of George Cardinal Pell, Pax Invictis, published by Ignatius Press
https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/us-toddlers-miraculous-survival-after-prayers-to-george-pell/news-story/906ffce986c3c8d2364b199fb15d49a2
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.51005
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22837756 (291240ZMAR25) Notable: How prayers to controversial dead Cardinal George Pell 'brought a little boy back to life' after he stopped breathing for almost an hour: 'It's a miracle' - George Pell has been credited with the unlikely recovery of a young American boy who stopped breathing for 52 minutes after he fell into a swimming pool. Parents of the 18-month-old Vincent are said to have prayed for the intercession of the late cardinal before he was discharged from an Arizona hospital. Sydney Archbishop Anthony Fisher related the story in an address to an event organised to honour Pell's legacy at a Catholic liberal-arts college in Sydney's west on Wednesday evening. Pell was Australia's most senior Catholic, having served as the archbishop of Melbourne and Sydney before taking charge of the Vatican's financial affairs. Campion College also unveiled the newly-named George Cardinal Pell Grand Hall at the event attended by former prime ministers John Howard and Tony Abbott. 'He's 18 months old and fell into a swimming pool,' the archbishop was quoted as saying by The Australian. 'He stopped breathing for 52 minutes. His parents prayed for the intercession of Cardinal Pell. The boy survived and came off life support free of any damage to brain or lungs or heart. He's fine now and his doctors are calling it a miracle.' Pell's supporters may cite the boy's unlikely recovery as one of two miracles required for canonisation as a saint of the Catholic Church. The process generally does not begin for at least five years following the individuals death and would likely be a politically fraught process given Pell's controversial legacy. Vincent was said to have spent 10 days in hospital before being discharged. The boy's uncle, a Catholic priest, is reported to have contacted Pell's former secretary Father Joseph Hamilton requesting prayers for Vincent's recovery. Mr Hamilton claimed the boy's parents had prayed to Pell after having met him in 2021 while he was on a book tour in their home town of Phoenix.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>51004
How prayers to controversial dead Cardinal George Pell 'brought a little boy back to life' after he stopped breathing for almost an hour: 'It's a miracle'
NICK WILSON - 28 March 2025
1/2
George Pell has been credited with the unlikely recovery of a young American boy who stopped breathing for 52 minutes after he fell into a swimming pool.
Parents of the 18-month-old Vincent are said to have prayed for the intercession of the late cardinal before he was discharged from an Arizona hospital.
Sydney Archbishop Anthony Fisher related the story in an address to an event organised to honour Pell's legacy at a Catholic liberal-arts college in Sydney's west on Wednesday evening.
Pell was Australia's most senior Catholic, having served as the archbishop of Melbourne and Sydney before taking charge of the Vatican's financial affairs.
Campion College also unveiled the newly-named George Cardinal Pell Grand Hall at the event attended by former prime ministers John Howard and Tony Abbott.
'He's 18 months old and fell into a swimming pool,' the archbishop was quoted as saying by The Australian.
'He stopped breathing for 52 minutes. His parents prayed for the intercession of Cardinal Pell.'
'The boy survived and came off life support free of any damage to brain or lungs or heart. He's fine now and his doctors are calling it a miracle.'
Pell's supporters may cite the boy's unlikely recovery as one of two miracles required for canonisation as a saint of the Catholic Church.
The process generally does not begin for at least five years following the individuals death and would likely be a politically fraught process given Pell's controversial legacy.
Vincent was said to have spent 10 days in hospital before being discharged.
The boy's uncle, a Catholic priest, is reported to have contacted Pell's former secretary Father Joseph Hamilton requesting prayers for Vincent's recovery.
Mr Hamilton claimed the boy's parents had prayed to Pell after having met him in 2021 while he was on a book tour in their home town of Phoenix.
He was promoting his three-volume Prison Journal, which he wrote during a 404-day stint largely spent in solitary confinement after being convicted of a range of sexual offences for which he has since been acquitted.
He was acquitted by the High Court in 2020 of sexually assaulting two choirboys in the sacristy of St Patrick's Cathedral in East Melbourne.
The events were said to have taken place on two occasions in late 1996 and early 1997 when Pell had recently been appointed Archbishop of Melbourne.
Pell was first tried in August 2018 before a jury which was ultimately unable to reach a verdict. He was found guilty of all five sexual offences in a separate trial later that year.
A majority of the Victorian Court of Appeal subsequently upheld his convictions before the High Court quashed the convictions.
The single judgment published by the court held there was a 'significant possibility that an innocent person has been convicted because the evidence did not establish guilt'.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.51006
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.51007
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22840864 (300822ZMAR25) Notable: Turnbull’s ‘security’ forum more about personal vendettas - "Malcolm Turnbull has chosen 100 people, whom he describes as “leading’” defence and foreign policy thinkers, to participate in a forum at the National Press Club on Monday. The “Sovereignty and Security Forum” is necessary, Turnbull says, because “the second Trump administration is challenging and overturning assumptions about the international order, which compels close allies to re-examine the fundamentals of their foreign and defence policies”. This includes ANZUS and the AUKUS submarine pact. Unless we include half the first-year cadets at our tri-service military academy it’s doubtful we’d have anywhere close to 100 experts in these fields. But even so, there’s bound to be quite a few China apologists at the forum. Some may be tempted to cite an article that’s just been published by an Australian think tank by ANU academic Edward Chan. He argues that Australia should be looking for opportunities to collaborate with China on maritime security and ocean-related issues in areas such as transnational crime, sea lane safety and climate change. Chan notes that many countries in the region remain open to working with China on these topics, and that by being proactive in dialogue with China we’d enhance our role as a regional maritime state. But how can a state such as Australia, one that helped shape the Law of the Sea treaty in international negotiations over a decade and that abides by key maritime laws, have productive engagement with China? The People’s Republic of China is a power that’s actively and comprehensively provoking us and breaking ocean laws it’s signed up to. It’s “monstering” other nations to take their maritime territories and land features in their offshore zones. China has ignored international legal outcomes on Law of the Sea rulings. It destroys the maritime environment by building artificial islands in the offshore estates of other countries. If Turnbull’s forum endorses this approach, it would give a false legitimacy to China’s hollow commitments to international law." - Anthony Bergin, senior fellow at Strategic Analysis Australia - theaustralian.com.au
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50771
>>50772
>>50962
‘Disrupter’ Turnbull questions worth of AUKUS, challenges US alliance in light of Trump presidency
CAMERON STEWART - March 28, 2025
In his newly self-appointed role as the great disrupter, the former prime minister will host a high-powered security forum in Canberra on Monday that seeks to pressure both sides of politics to distance themselves from the US while Donald Trump is President.
Turnbull’s controversial push against Canberra’s long-established pro-American diplomatic and defence priorities is a rare – but not unheard of – position for ex-prime ministers to take. Labor’s Paul Keating and Liberal Malcolm Fraser both railed against the Australia-US alliance after leaving office.
Turnbull claims his so-called “Sovereignty and Security Forum” is necessary because “the second Trump administration is challenging and overturning assumptions about the international order (which) compels close allies to re-examine the fundamentals of their foreign and defence policies. This is happening in the capitals of Europe, in Ottawa and elsewhere, but not in Canberra”, he says in the invitation to the one-day forum.
Turnbull believes Trump’s maverick behaviour in global affairs since assuming office, and especially his transactional approach to close allies, should lead to “serious scrutiny” of the mutual benefits of the ANZUS alliance and the AUKUS nuclear submarine pact as well as “a fundamental rethink across a broad range of policies including the AUKUS submarine project, trade, defence and regional diplomacy”.
Turnbull’s push for such a forum will not be welcomed by either side of politics in an election campaign in which both sides will be seeking to avoid any fallout with Trump when he is considering imposing more tariffs on US allies.
But Turnbull has already been criticised for the timing of his attacks on Trump last month, when he attacked the President’s pro-tariff policies in the event of Trump’s decision whether to proceed with 25 per cent tariffs on steel and aluminium imports to the US. A furious Trump attacked Turnbull on social media just days before refusing to grant an exemption to Australia. There is no evidence that Turnbull’s comments played a role in Trump’s decision but they were widely viewed as unhelpful.
Turnbull also wants his forum to spotlight the weaknesses of the AUKUS nuclear submarine deal. There is more than a degree of self-interest at play here for Turnbull, who appears to be relishing the pressure and uncertainties now facing AUKUS under Trump, given that the AUKUS deal scuttled the Turnbull-brokered deal to purchase French conventional submarines from France.
Turnbull has chosen some of the best diplomatic, strategic and defence brains to attend the forum. He has sprinkled the panels with critics such as Hugh White, Gareth Evans, Geoff Raby, John McCarthy and Sam Roggeveen, who generally agree with Turnbull’s world view that Australia has been too cosy with the US and needs to question the relationship more.
He has included some fierce critics of AUKUS, including Rear Admiral Peter Briggs. But Turnbull has also included political centrists and even a few China hawks on panels to provide some balance and sparks in the debate.
The central questions will include how Australia should defend itself in the face of a less reliable America, what type of security threats the country faces, how valid are current policies to respond, and whether the AUKUS deal is viable and realistic
Whether anything comes of the Turnbull forum in terms of influencing the policies of either the Albanese government or Peter Dutton’s Coalition is doubtful. But it seems nothing will stop the former PM trying to deal himself back into the public debate.
https://www.theaustralian.com.au/commentary/disrupter-turnbull-questions-worth-of-aukus-challenges-us-alliance-in-light-of-trump-presidency/news-story/cfab9ab68fea2dbb820717922436c7b9
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.51008
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22840880 (300840ZMAR25) Notable: Park Hyatt Melbourne cancels plans to host George Pell memorial - The Park Hyatt Melbourne has backflipped on plans to host a George Pell memorial event after copping fierce backlash online. The five star hotel had agreed to host the event, labelled The George Cardinal Pell Memorial, but pulled the plug citing a “heightened risk” to the safety of its staff and guests following the public outcry. In 2019 Cardinal Pell became the most senior Catholic cleric to be convicted of child sexual abuse, but those charges were later quashed in 2020. He died in 2023, at the age of 81. In an email sent to event organisers, charity group Aid to the Church in Need, the Park Hyatt said it could no longer play host to the ticketed event in the face of the rumours of possible public action. “As mentioned, the hotel was recently made aware of public threats and planned protests related to the nature of your dinner event,” it read. “After further consideration, we have assessed that these circumstances pose a heightened risk to the safety and security of both our guests and colleagues, as well as the wider community. “Given our primary commitment to the safety and wellbeing of everyone at the hotel, we have unfortunately come to the difficult decision to decline hosting this event.” A number of people on social media platform Reddit said they had called the hotel to voice their disapproval of the event, while others said they planned to rally out the front on the night. The controversial evening is set to go on with the Aid to the Church website now listing the venue as “to be announced”. The $150 evening is said to include “canapes, drinks and a three-course meal” with equally controversial author Tess Livingstone as the guest speaker. Ms Livingstone recently released a biography that shone a favourable light on Cardinal Pell and his “unjust imprisonment”.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>51004
>>51005
>>51006
Park Hyatt Melbourne cancels plans to host George Pell memorial
Jordan McCarthy - March 29, 2025
The Park Hyatt Melbourne has backflipped on plans to host a George Pell memorial event after copping fierce backlash online.
The five star hotel had agreed to host the event, labelled The George Cardinal Pell Memorial, but pulled the plug citing a “heightened risk” to the safety of its staff and guests following the public outcry.
In 2019 Cardinal Pell became the most senior Catholic cleric to be convicted of child sexual abuse, but those charges were later quashed in 2020.
He died in 2023, at the age of 81.
In an email sent to event organisers, charity group Aid to the Church in Need, the Park Hyatt said it could no longer play host to the ticketed event in the face of the rumours of possible public action.
“As mentioned, the hotel was recently made aware of public threats and planned protests related to the nature of your dinner event,” it read.
“After further consideration, we have assessed that these circumstances pose a heightened risk to the safety and security of both our guests and colleagues, as well as the wider community.
“Given our primary commitment to the safety and wellbeing of everyone at the hotel, we have unfortunately come to the difficult decision to decline hosting this event.”
National Director of Aid to the Church in Need Bernard Toutounji said he was disappointed the venue had bowed to public pressure.
“The late Cardinal Pell was a great friend of Aid to the Church in Need, an international charity supporting suffering and persecuted Christians around the world,” he said
“We regret that a venue for a fundraising event has received threats leading that venue to decide not to host the event.
“Aid to the Church in Need will continue its efforts to raise spiritual and material support for suffering and persecuted Christians, as it has done around the world for almost eighty years.”
A number of people on social media platform Reddit said they had called the hotel to voice their disapproval of the event, while others said they planned to rally out the front on the night.
The controversial evening is set to go on with the Aid to the Church website now listing the venue as “to be announced”.
The $150 evening is said to include “canapes, drinks and a three-course meal” with equally controversial author Tess Livingstone as the guest speaker.
Ms Livingstone recently released a biography that shone a favourable light on Cardinal Pell and his “unjust imprisonment”.
When contacted, the Park Hyatt told the Herald Sun it was “not in a position to be able to comment on any of our guests or customers”.
https://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/victoria/park-hyatt-melbourne-cancels-plans-to-host-george-pell-memorial/news-story/d08b09cdb36d46d630659b1df46e2378
https://aidtochurch.org/thegcpmemorial
https://www.reddit.com/r/melbourne/comments/1jeu8hs/yeah_seems_like_a_worthwhile_celebration_what_a/
https://www.reddit.com/r/ballarat/comments/1jfkbec/ive_shared_this_in_the_melbourne_and_geelong_subs/
https://www.reddit.com/r/melbourne/comments/1jjdb6v/for_those_following_the_george_pell_memorial_post/
>[Cardinal Pell]
>Dark to LIGHT.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.51009
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22845494 (310924ZMAR25) Notable: Video: 'I would prefer that it wasn't there': PM Anthony Albanese confirms Chinese research vessel was spotted off coast of Australia - Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has said he'd "prefer it" if a Chinese research vessel wasn't sailing through Australian waters after being probed over the ship's close proximity. The Tan Suo Yi Hao, a Chinese mothership which ferries smaller submarines, is confirmed to be sitting in the South Australian coast in the Great Australian Bight. The PM said the government was continuing to "monitor the situation" but wouldn't be detailing any further information for "obvious reasons". "I would prefer that it wasn't there. But we live in circumstances where, just as Australia has vessels in the South China Sea and vessels in the Taiwan Strait and a range of areas, this vessel is there," Albanese said in Perth today. "We're keeping an eye on this, as we do. The Australian Defence Force [is] monitoring what is happening … It's going from New Zealand. We expect it to go around to China… around that way." The so-called "spy ship" is used for scientific research and intelligence collection, according to reports. China's Institute of Deep-sea Science and Engineering states the 94m ship is capable of exploring depths of 10,000m. It comes a month after a flotilla of Chinese navy ships made a surprise trip around Australia. Australian officials raised concerns over a live-fire drill alert however Chinese armed forces hit back and said it was an "exaggerated" response.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50957
>>50833
'I would prefer that it wasn't there': PM Anthony Albanese confirms Chinese research vessel was spotted off coast of Australia
April Glover - Mar 31, 2025
Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has said he'd "prefer it" if a Chinese research vessel wasn't sailing through Australian waters after being probed over the ship's close proximity.
The Tan Suo Yi Hao, a Chinese mothership which ferries smaller submarines, is confirmed to be sitting in the South Australian coast in the Great Australian Bight.
The PM said the government was continuing to "monitor the situation" but wouldn't be detailing any further information for "obvious reasons".
"I would prefer that it wasn't there. But we live in circumstances where, just as Australia has vessels in the South China Sea and vessels in the Taiwan Strait and a range of areas, this vessel is there," Albanese said in Perth today.
"We're keeping an eye on this, as we do. The Australian Defence Force [is] monitoring what is happening…
"It's going from New Zealand. We expect it to go around to China… around that way."
The so-called "spy ship" is used for scientific research and intelligence collection, according to reports.
China's Institute of Deep-sea Science and Engineering states the 94m ship is capable of exploring depths of 10,000m.
It comes a month after a flotilla of Chinese navy ships made a surprise trip around Australia.
Australian officials raised concerns over a live-fire drill alert however Chinese armed forces hit back and said it was an "exaggerated" response.
"Australia's claims are completely unfounded," Chinese defence ministry spokesperson Wu Qian said last month.
"China's actions are in full compliance with international law and international practices and will not affect aviation flight safety.
Albanese said during his campaign pitstop in Perth he had full confidence in Australia's armed forces and security agencies.
"What our task is to do, is to make sure that we represent Australia's national interest," he said.
"We do that each and every day and I have every confidence in our defence force and our security agencies to do just that."
The Department of Defence has been contacted for comment.
https://www.9news.com.au/national/anthony-albanese-confirms-presence-of-chinese-research-vessel-in-australian-waters/303392c9-f231-4959-8558-d2d7f2f1a54f
https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2025/mar/31/albanese-chinese-research-ship-australia-coast-tan-suo-yi-hao
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.51010
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22845509 (310937ZMAR25) Notable: Turnbull’s ‘security’ forum more about personal vendettas - "Malcolm Turnbull has chosen 100 people, whom he describes as “leading’” defence and foreign policy thinkers, to participate in a forum at the National Press Club on Monday. The “Sovereignty and Security Forum” is necessary, Turnbull says, because “the second Trump administration is challenging and overturning assumptions about the international order, which compels close allies to re-examine the fundamentals of their foreign and defence policies”. This includes ANZUS and the AUKUS submarine pact. Unless we include half the first-year cadets at our tri-service military academy it’s doubtful we’d have anywhere close to 100 experts in these fields. But even so, there’s bound to be quite a few China apologists at the forum. Some may be tempted to cite an article that’s just been published by an Australian think tank by ANU academic Edward Chan. He argues that Australia should be looking for opportunities to collaborate with China on maritime security and ocean-related issues in areas such as transnational crime, sea lane safety and climate change. Chan notes that many countries in the region remain open to working with China on these topics, and that by being proactive in dialogue with China we’d enhance our role as a regional maritime state. But how can a state such as Australia, one that helped shape the Law of the Sea treaty in international negotiations over a decade and that abides by key maritime laws, have productive engagement with China? The People’s Republic of China is a power that’s actively and comprehensively provoking us and breaking ocean laws it’s signed up to. It’s “monstering” other nations to take their maritime territories and land features in their offshore zones. China has ignored international legal outcomes on Law of the Sea rulings. It destroys the maritime environment by building artificial islands in the offshore estates of other countries. If Turnbull’s forum endorses this approach, it would give a false legitimacy to China’s hollow commitments to international law." - Anthony Bergin, senior fellow at Strategic Analysis Australia - theaustralian.com.au
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50771
>>50962
>>51007
Turnbull’s ‘security’ forum more about personal vendettas
Anthony Bergin - 31 March 2025
Malcolm Turnbull has chosen 100 people, whom he describes as “leading’” defence and foreign policy thinkers, to participate in a forum at the National Press Club on Monday.
The “Sovereignty and Security Forum” is necessary, Turnbull says, because “the second Trump administration is challenging and overturning assumptions about the international order, which compels close allies to re-examine the fundamentals of their foreign and defence policies”. This includes ANZUS and the AUKUS submarine pact.
Unless we include half the first-year cadets at our tri-service military academy it’s doubtful we’d have anywhere close to 100 experts in these fields. But even so, there’s bound to be quite a few China apologists at the forum. Some may be tempted to cite an article that’s just been published by an Australian think tank by ANU academic Edward Chan.
He argues that Australia should be looking for opportunities to collaborate with China on maritime security and ocean-related issues in areas such as transnational crime, sea lane safety and climate change. Chan notes that many countries in the region remain open to working with China on these topics, and that by being proactive in dialogue with China we’d enhance our role as a regional maritime state.
Reduced to its foundations, this line suggests that any kind of dialogue is good – if only we can quarantine areas of major disagreement, we can find narrow (though shrinking) areas for productive co-operation.
But how can a state such as Australia, one that helped shape the Law of the Sea treaty in international negotiations over a decade and that abides by key maritime laws, have productive engagement with China?
The People’s Republic of China is a power that’s actively and comprehensively provoking us and breaking ocean laws it’s signed up to. It’s “monstering” other nations to take their maritime territories and land features in their offshore zones. China has ignored international legal outcomes on Law of the Sea rulings. It destroys the maritime environment by building artificial islands in the offshore estates of other countries.
If Turnbull’s forum endorses this approach, it would give a false legitimacy to China’s hollow commitments to international law.
We would enable and encourage continued Chinese state behaviour that’s deeply against our interests. Chinese fishing fleets are brazenly exploiting other states’ fisheries. China does little to police its own boats involved in illegal fishing. It deploys its maritime militias, its heavily armed coastguard, and the PLA Navy in ways that are against Australia’s and other regional states’ interests.
On climate change, China urges us to co-operate as a diversion from Chinese strategic objectives and while it opens new coal-fired power stations. On transnational crime, the PRC is behind most of it in Asia and the Pacific Islands region.
Based on China’s record of conduct, we should have no expectation it will be anything but the most ruthless exploiter of undersea natural resources, so co-operating with it on “blue economy” issues would be similarly misguided.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.51011
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22850587 (010915ZAPR25) Notable: ‘Not on my watch’: Albanese says key US trade grievances are not negotiable - Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has declared key issues in trade talks with the United States are “not up for negotiation” after the US trade office added to its list of grievances with Australia just days before the Trump administration unveils a new tranche of tariffs. The 2025 report on foreign trade barriers, released by the United States Trade Representative (USTR) details several unresolved trade issues with Australia, including the prohibition of imported uncooked American beef, pork and poultry products, as well as apples and pears. It also renews concerns about Labor’s plan to impose local content requirements on streaming services such as Netflix under the National Cultural Policy, as well as a long-standing grievance about issues to do with patents and drug marketing. Albanese said three of the major concerns raised in the latest US trade report - the news bargaining code, biosecurity and pharmaceuticals – were “not up for negotiation from the Australian government”. “We will defend Australia’s interests,” he said. “The idea that we would weaken biosecurity laws is, as my mum would say, cutting off your nose to spite your face. In order to defend the exports that total less than 5 per cent of Australia’s exports, you undermine our biosecurity system? Not on my watch.” Pressed by reporters on his previous remarks about Trump and his plans for another direct call with the US president, Albanese avoided answering the questions directly but repeated: “I’ve very clearly indicated Australia is not negotiating over the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme. We’re not negotiating over the News Bargaining Code [and] we won’t undermine our biosecurity.”
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50785
>>50843
‘Not on my watch’: Albanese says key US trade grievances are not negotiable
Michael Koziol - April 1, 2025
1/2
Washington: Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has declared key issues in trade talks with the United States are “not up for negotiation” after the US trade office added to its list of grievances with Australia just days before the Trump administration unveils a new tranche of tariffs.
The 2025 report on foreign trade barriers, released by the United States Trade Representative (USTR) on Monday (Tuesday AEDT) details several unresolved trade issues with Australia, including the prohibition of imported uncooked American beef, pork and poultry products, as well as apples and pears.
It also renews concerns about Labor’s plan to impose local content requirements on streaming services such as Netflix under the National Cultural Policy, as well as a long-standing grievance about issues to do with patents and drug marketing.
The latest report adds a new grievance about the News Media Bargaining Code introduced by the Coalition in 2021. The code compelled digital platforms and social media companies such as Google and Meta (which owns Facebook and Instagram) to pay news organisations for content used on those platforms.
The American update also took stock of the Albanese government’s December 2024 announcement that large tech firms would be forced to enter into agreements with news companies or face higher taxes under a scheme called the news bargaining incentive.
“The government announced its intent to tighten the rules surrounding the Bargaining Code, including by introducing a financial penalty for designated platforms that do not reach or renew commercial agreements,” the USTR report said.
In February, this masthead revealed the Albanese government was hitting the pause button on that scheme to stave off retaliation from the Trump administration, given that it would likely be seen as punishing American tech companies.
The USTR report did not mention a go-slow or pause on the initiative. “The United States continues to monitor this issue,” it said.
Campaigning in South Australia, Albanese said three of the major concerns raised in the latest US trade report – the news bargaining code, biosecurity and pharmaceuticals – were “not up for negotiation from the Australian government”.
“We will defend Australia’s interests,” he said. “The idea that we would weaken biosecurity laws is, as my mum would say, cutting off your nose to spite your face.
“In order to defend the exports that total less than 5 per cent of Australia’s exports, you undermine our biosecurity system? Not on my watch.”
Pressed by reporters on his previous remarks about Trump and his plans for another direct call with the US president, Albanese avoided answering the questions directly but repeated: “I’ve very clearly indicated Australia is not negotiating over the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme. We’re not negotiating over the News Bargaining Code [and] we won’t undermine our biosecurity.”
Trade discussions between Australia and the US were ongoing, Albanese said, including the other issues raised in the latest USTR report.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.51012
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22850600 (010928ZAPR25) Notable: Dutton says Chinese research ship is collecting intelligence, mapping undersea cables - The opposition leader has slammed the prime minister's response to a Chinese research ship south of Australia, saying he believes the vessel is gathering intelligence and mapping the route of Australia's undersea cables. The dual purpose vessel the Tan Suo Yi Hao was conducting joint research with New Zealand scientists before travelling west along Australia's southern coastline, outside of Australia's exclusive economic zone. NZ media have reported the submersibles took Chinese and NZ scientists to the bottom of the Puysegur Trench, 6 kilometres below sea level, on a joint research mission. Anthony Albanese told reporters in Perth on Monday that he'd "prefer" the ship wasn't in Australian waters, but suggested China hadn't broken international law. But Peter Dutton took aim at Mr Albanese's response, accusing him of "weakness" on national security. He said government advice had been conflicting, and that it was unclear whether the Australian Border Force or the ADF were monitoring the vessel. "It is unbelievable that the prime minister can't explain to the Australian people what is happening here," he told reporters in Melbourne on Tuesday. "Of course, there's a collection of intelligence and of course, there is a mapping of undersea cables." It comes weeks after China's navy conducted an unprecedented circumnavigation of much of Australia, as well as hosting live fire exercises in the Tasman Sea.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50833
>>51009
Dutton says Chinese research ship is collecting intelligence, mapping undersea cables
Samantha Dick and Stephen Dziedzic - 1 April 2025
The opposition leader has slammed the prime minister's response to a Chinese research ship south of Australia, saying he believes the vessel is gathering intelligence and mapping the route of Australia's undersea cables.
The dual purpose vessel the Tan Suo Yi Hao was conducting joint research with New Zealand scientists before travelling west along Australia's southern coastline, outside of Australia's exclusive economic zone.
NZ media have reported the submersibles took Chinese and NZ scientists to the bottom of the Puysegur Trench, 6 kilometres below sea level, on a joint research mission.
Anthony Albanese told reporters in Perth on Monday that he'd "prefer" the ship wasn't in Australian waters, but suggested China hadn't broken international law.
"We live in circumstances where, just as Australia has vessels in the South China Sea and vessels in the Taiwan Strait and a range of areas, this vessel is there," he said.
Mr Albanese said the Australian Defence Force was monitoring the ship as it makes its way back to China.
But Peter Dutton took aim at Mr Albanese's response, accusing him of "weakness" on national security.
He said government advice had been conflicting, and that it was unclear whether the Australian Border Force or the ADF were monitoring the vessel.
"It is unbelievable that the prime minister can't explain to the Australian people what is happening here," he told reporters in Melbourne on Tuesday.
"Of course, there's a collection of intelligence and of course, there is a mapping of undersea cables."
It comes weeks after China's navy conducted an unprecedented circumnavigation of much of Australia, as well as hosting live fire exercises in the Tasman Sea.
Analysts say the vessel is likely surveying underwater features and the route of a 5,000 kilometre long subsea communications cable, which connects Sydney to Perth, before branching out to Singapore.
It's not the first time Chinese vessels have mapped Australian waters, with a similar research ship mapping waters off Australia's Western coastline in 2020.
But over the last 12 months, Russian and Chinese vessels have been accused of deliberately damaging undersea cables in both Taiwan and Europe — drawing attention to how they can be targeted to disrupt the internet and essential services.
Mr Dutton said Australia "requires connectivity to the rest of the world as an island nation," adding "the way we communicate with our partners and allies of the rest of the world is contingent on those cables."
He also slammed Mr Albanese's comparison between Australian naval exercises and Chinese activities in Australian waters as "completely offensive to the men and women of the Royal Australian Navy".
"The prime minister needs to explain that statement," he said.
Mr Dutton flagged the Coalition was set to make some significant announcements during the campaign trail, telling voters "you haven't seen anything yet".
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-04-01/dutton-says-chinese-research-ship-mapping-undersea-cables/105122068
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.51013
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22850602 (010932ZAPR25) Notable: Chinese survey vessel fits pattern of escalating intimidation - "The Chinese survey ship now navigating Australia’s southern coastline is a pointed reminder that Canberra’s “co-operate where we can, disagree where we must” approach to stabilising relations with Beijing is no defence against the sort of treatment our nearest neighbours have suffered for years. For a broad hint as to what China had planned for Australian waters, successive federal governments need only have looked to our closest neighbours and the ongoing intimidation faced from Chinese grey hulls surveying their waters. Someone in Canberra must have noticed the intermittent geopolitical stoushes over more than a decade whipped up on our maritime borders by Chinese survey vessels lingering in Indonesia’s Natuna waters on the edge of the South China Sea, in Malaysia and Vietnam? Surely nobody needs reminding of Beijing’s escalating torment and harassment of The Philippines, America’s most loyal Asian ally and an Australian defence treaty partner? Just what the Tan Suo Yi Hao vessel, equipped with a submersible capable of scanning the seabed, is doing in Australian waters is still up for conjecture, given it has just completed an authorised 45-day joint survey of southern New Zealand waters. That will be better understood in coming days, when it either heads for home or takes a right turn into the Indian Ocean off the West Australian coast. But Australia should be in no doubt that China is sending an unambiguous message with its live-fire exercises off the east coast and warship circumnavigation last month, and this latest incursion by a vessel which - as with almost all such ships – is likely equipped for dual civilian and military purpose. As it has done for years in our neighbourhood, Beijing appears to be normalising intimidatory behaviour in Australian waters. Like the proverbial slow-boiling frog, Canberra can either call it out now or risk a steady escalation in coming months and years." - Amanda Hodge - theaustralian.com.au
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50833
>>51009
>>51012
Chinese survey vessel fits pattern of escalating intimidation
AMANDA HODGE - 1 April 2025
The Chinese survey ship now navigating Australia’s southern coastline is a pointed reminder that Canberra’s “co-operate where we can, disagree where we must” approach to stabilising relations with Beijing is no defence against the sort of treatment our nearest neighbours have suffered for years.
For a broad hint as to what China had planned for Australian waters, successive federal governments need only have looked to our closest neighbours and the ongoing intimidation faced from Chinese grey hulls surveying their waters.
Someone in Canberra must have noticed the intermittent geopolitical stoushes over more than a decade whipped up on our maritime borders by Chinese survey vessels lingering in Indonesia’s Natuna waters on the edge of the South China Sea, in Malaysia and Vietnam?
Surely nobody needs reminding of Beijing’s escalating torment and harassment of The Philippines, America’s most loyal Asian ally and an Australian defence treaty partner?
Last September Malaysia, a country whose preferred response to regular Chinese maritime harassment is to pretend it isn’t happening, went to the trouble of sending a patrol ship to shadow the Ke Xue San Hao Chinese research vessel conducting unauthorised surveys at Ardasier Bank, 278km from Kota Kinabalu.
Chinese survey and coast guard vessels have been such a constant irritant in Indonesia’s Natuna waters in the south of the South China Sea that former Indonesian president Joko Widodo twice dusted off his bomber jacket to reinforce his country’s sovereignty on the deck of an Indonesian naval vessel.
Within days of his successor Prabowo Subianto’s inauguration last October, Indonesia’s Bakamla coast guard publicly released a video showing the latest confrontation with a China Coast Guard vessel that – like a bad penny – kept returning to the Natunas to harass oil and gas surveying vessels despite being chased off by Indonesian navy ships.
Last June, Hanoi publicly demanded China’s Hai Yang 26 vessel end its “illegal survey activities” within Vietnam’s exclusive economic zone and continental shelf.
“Vietnam also demands that China not repeat such illegal activities, fully respect Vietnam’s sovereign rights and jurisdiction, respect international law and adhere to UNCLOS (UN Convention on the Law of the Sea) 1982,” the foreign ministry thundered.
Compare that with Prime Minister Anthony Albanese’s quiet regret this week at the incursion of a Chinese survey vessel off the South Australian coast.
“I would prefer that it wasn’t there,” he said of the Tan Suo Yi Hao survey vessel now making its way along the South Australian coast near submarine cables critical to Australia’s communications lines.
“But we live in circumstances where, just as Australia has vessels in the South China Sea and vessels in the Taiwan Strait and a range of areas, this vessel is there.”
It took opposition defence spokesman Andrew Hastie to point out the “false equivalence” of a Chinese vessel potentially surveying Australia’s territorial waters and Australian navy ships participating in freedom of navigation exercises in contested international waters.
That Australia should now be getting the “Southeast Asia treatment” from our biggest trading partner should come as no surprise, given the precedent it has set in our region.
What is more surprising is that the government appears to have been caught so flat-footed by it.
Did we think we would be exempt?
Just what the Tan Suo Yi Hao vessel, equipped with a submersible capable of scanning the seabed, is doing in Australian waters is still up for conjecture, given it has just completed an authorised 45-day joint survey of southern New Zealand waters.
That will be better understood in coming days, when it either heads for home or takes a right turn into the Indian Ocean off the West Australian coast.
But Australia should be in no doubt that China is sending an unambiguous message with its live-fire exercises off the east coast and warship circumnavigation last month, and this latest incursion by a vessel which – as with almost all such ships – is likely equipped for dual civilian and military purpose.
As it has done for years in our neighbourhood, Beijing appears to be normalising intimidatory behaviour in Australian waters.
Like the proverbial slow-boiling frog, Canberra can either call it out now or risk a steady escalation in coming months and years.
https://www.theaustralian.com.au/world/chinese-survey-vessel-fits-pattern-of-escalating-intimidation/news-story/7a2309e3df6ff2ee3ae6f40cdafd5a43
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.51014
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22850614 (010943ZAPR25) Notable: Video: Six Australian universities close Chinese government-linked Confucius Institutes - Six Australian universities have now closed Chinese government-linked Confucius Institutes on their campuses, two years after the federal government signalled it would not allow any more of the controversial educational centres to open their doors in Australia. The government ramped up scrutiny of the institutes, which critics said had undermined academic freedom and allowed Chinese authorities to exert undue influence over what was taught at universities. The centres have now quietly disappeared from some Australian campuses, with the University of Melbourne, the University of Queensland (UQ), the University of New South Wales (UNSW) and the University of Western Australia (UWA) all opting not to renew their contracts to keep them running. Adelaide University also appeared to have closed its Confucius Institute, although it refused to confirm or deny that. Confucius Institutes are hosted on Australian campuses in partnership with Chinese universities, and typically teach courses on Chinese language and culture. But in recent years, several Australian universities have scrambled to renegotiate contracts and exert more control over what is taught, as the federal government became increasingly concerned Beijing was using the centres to monitor Chinese international students on campus and push narratives favourable to its interests. In 2019, the ABC reported that applicants for volunteer teaching positions at the institutes were required to demonstrate political loyalty to the Chinese government, while Human Rights Watch said they had repeatedly censored any discussion of issues sensitive to Beijing.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50996
>>50997
>>51000
Six Australian universities close Chinese government-linked Confucius Institutes
Stephen Dziedzic and Conor Duffy - 1 April 2025
1/2
Six Australian universities have now closed Chinese government-linked Confucius Institutes on their campuses, two years after the federal government signalled it would not allow any more of the controversial educational centres to open their doors in Australia.
The government ramped up scrutiny of the institutes, which critics said had undermined academic freedom and allowed Chinese authorities to exert undue influence over what was taught at universities.
The centres have now quietly disappeared from some Australian campuses, with the University of Melbourne, the University of Queensland (UQ), the University of New South Wales (UNSW) and the University of Western Australia (UWA) all opting not to renew their contracts to keep them running.
Adelaide University also appeared to have closed its Confucius Institute, although it refused to confirm or deny that.
Confucius Institutes are hosted on Australian campuses in partnership with Chinese universities, and typically teach courses on Chinese language and culture.
But in recent years, several Australian universities have scrambled to renegotiate contracts and exert more control over what is taught, as the federal government became increasingly concerned Beijing was using the centres to monitor Chinese international students on campus and push narratives favourable to its interests.
In 2019, the ABC reported that applicants for volunteer teaching positions at the institutes were required to demonstrate political loyalty to the Chinese government, while Human Rights Watch said they had repeatedly censored any discussion of issues sensitive to Beijing.
The federal government has also required universities to provide more information about the centres and — in some cases — register them on the Foreign Influence Transparency Scheme.
"The foreign minister has been clear in conveying her expectation to the university sector that Australian universities should not establish any new Confucius Institutes," a Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade spokesperson said.
A separate Australian government source said senior officials had also made it "crystal clear" to universities that the government saw Confucius Institutes as a "problem" which "has to be carefully managed".
The source insisted the government had not issued any demands to universities to shut down the existing centres.
Still, over the last five years, several of Australia's leading universities have cut ties with their institutes — although none of them have publicly cited concerns around foreign interference.
Contracts not renewed
The University of Melbourne said its partnership with Nanjing University ended in August last year and there was "no additional need to renew" the agreement.
"The Confucius Institute was only one of the many ways the University of Melbourne continues to deepen its understanding of China and capacity to engage with Chinese institutions," a spokesperson said.
"Today, the university offers a multitude of Chinese language and Asia capability programs and experiences to enable significant knowledge and cultural exchange across the community."
Like several Australian universities, Melbourne University also receives a large amount of research funding from the US, which has recently asked researchers if their universities have links to China.
A University of Queensland spokesperson said its agreement with Tianjin University to run its Confucius Institute concluded at the end of last year.
"UQ continues to foster relationships with leading institutions around the world, including in China, in the areas of student mobility, joint degree programs and research," they said.
Both UNSW and the University of Western Australia also told the ABC they had decided not to renew their contracts for Confucius Institutes — although they cited the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic as their main reason.
A University of New South Wales spokesperson said their agreement "lapsed in 2022" and was "not renewed due to COVID-19 … following a mutual decision by all parties".
"The university is developing its own program in Chinese studies, including language and literacy," they said.
"UNSW is committed to thought leadership and encouraging open dialogue in the China–Australia bilateral relationship and broader Asia literacy."
The University of Western Australia's spokesperson said its Confucius Institute shut in 2023 "following ongoing disruptions from COVID-related border closures".
"The University recognises the importance of Asian language skills," they said.
"UWA has expanded its Chinese studies program to meet demand for language education, negating the need to pursue a new agreement for a CI."
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.51015
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22850628 (011001ZAPR25) Notable: Video: Former PM Malcolm Turnbull imitates Trump, says 'eerie resonance' between president's Canada stance and Putin's approach to Ukraine - Malcolm Turnbull has delivered another scathing appraisal of Donald Trump before impersonating the US president, and has said he "couldn't pick between" Anthony Albanese and Peter Dutton as a better leader to deal with the current US administration. Speaking to the National Press Conference today, the former prime minister compared Trump to Russian dictator Vladimir Putin for his stated desire to absorb Canada into the United States. "There's an eerie resonance between the language Trump uses about Canada and the language Putin uses about Ukraine: borders are fictional, doesn't deserve to be a separate country and so forth," Turnbull said. "And then I need not remind you of the shameful way Trump has treated Ukraine." He finished his final answer of the Press Club appearance with an impersonation of the US president, which was met with a scattering of laughs and applause. "Our leaders… have got to be able to stand up," Turnbull said, before mimicking the US president's speech. "And if that means you get a Breitbart or a 'Truth Social post saying you're weak and ineffectual, you don't know anything about China'… if you're spooked by that, you shouldn't be in the job."
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50771
>>50962
>>51007
Former PM Malcolm Turnbull imitates Trump, says 'eerie resonance' between president's Canada stance and Putin's approach to Ukraine
Daniel Jeffrey - Apr 1, 2025
Malcolm Turnbull has delivered another scathing appraisal of Donald Trump before impersonating the US president, and has said he "couldn't pick between" Anthony Albanese and Peter Dutton as a better leader to deal with the current US administration.
Speaking to the National Press Conference today, the former prime minister compared Trump to Russian dictator Vladimir Putin for his stated desire to absorb Canada into the United States.
"There's an eerie resonance between the language Trump uses about Canada and the language Putin uses about Ukraine: borders are fictional, doesn't deserve to be a separate country and so forth," Turnbull said.
"And then I need not remind you of the shameful way Trump has treated Ukraine."
Turnbull was in power during the first Trump administration, when he secured tariff exemptions from the president, but said the current US government was taking a drastically different approach to global affairs, with flow-on effects for Australia.
"The United States under President Trump does not share the values we've shared with every single one of his predecessors, Republican and Democrat, for over 80 years, and he does not pretend to share them," he said.
"This is a feature, not a bug, of the Trump administration.
"Now Australian sovereignty, sovereign autonomy, has never been so important, and yet in recent years, it has been diminished."
Turnbull said it was crucial for Australia to increase its defence capabilities to "become a genuine sovereign force capable of defending Australia, of deterring adversaries without American support", and argued there is "little prospect" Australia would ever receive any submarines under the AUKUS deal.
"The alternative submarine plans are difficult but they're not even being looked at," he said.
"Doing nothing, however, is even worse, because then you have nothing. At least if you say, 'alright, the odds are we're not going to get any subs... let's acquire some other long-range capabilities', that may not be as effective but at least do something.
"It is as though the government and opposition are frozen in some kind of bipartisan terror of admitting the truth. That's the problem and where the system is failing us.
"Bipartisanship is all very well but not when the two sides of politics are united in error."
The former prime minister's address comes just five days into the federal election campaign and as a second round of US tariffs are set to be announced this week.
Asked about whether current Prime Minister Anthony Albanese or Opposition Leader Peter Dutton would be better placed to deal with Trump, Turnbull said he "honestly couldn't pick between them".
He said Dutton faced a "two-edged sword" of being more politically aligned towards Trump and having a good relationship with Gina Rinehart – a massive Liberal Party donor and prominent Trump supporter.
"The difficulty of taking on Trump is you're then taking on the most popular person in the ecosystem in which you live," Turnbull said.
"Albanese doesn't have that. He doesn't have the advantage of great connections... but he also doesn't have the problem that his political base, his media environment, if you like, is fan boys for Donald Trump."
What Turnbull was decisive on, though, was the need for Australian leaders to be more transactional and forthright in dealing with Trump.
"The United States is a friend, but my plea to Australian politicians is: get off your knees and stand up for Australia," he said.
"Be as transactional with America as it is with us and remember in the imperial capital, they always regard deference as their due.
"Trying to get into a race of who can do the most sucking up, particularly with Mr Trump, as I know from direct experience, is not the way to advance your interests or your nation's interests."
He finished his final answer of the Press Club appearance with an impersonation of the US president, which was met with a scattering of laughs and applause.
"Our leaders... have got to be able to stand up," Turnbull said, before mimicking the US president's speech.
"And if that means you get a Breitbart or a 'Truth Social post saying you're weak and ineffectual, you don't know anything about China'... if you're spooked by that, you shouldn't be in the job."
https://www.9news.com.au/national/malcolm-turnbull-national-press-club-comments-donald-trump-australia/d2baa9a1-8018-4d56-90b6-2d33fd41182f
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.51016
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22850639 (011012ZAPR25) Notable: Queensland police could give evidence at US trial of Donald Day Jr, conspiracy theorist linked to Wieambilla attack - Details of a deadly attack on Queensland police will be aired during the trial of a conspiracy theorist in the United States charged in connection with the murders. Arizona man Donald Day Jr regularly communicated with Gareth and Stacey Train who, along with Gareth's brother Nathaniel, fired relentlessly at officers who entered their rural Queensland property in December 2022. Constables Rachel McCrow and Matthew Arnold, and a neighbour, Alan Dare, were killed in the shooting, which police labelled a religiously motivated terror attack. Mr Day now faces a total of five federal charges in the US - three relating to alleged threats made online, and two accusing him of violating firearms laws. US District Judge John J. Tuchi ruled this week that "fact witness testimony" would be allowed in the trial relating to the circumstances of the siege and why Queensland officers entered the Trains' property at Wieambilla. Evidence by fact witnesses includes information about what they observed or experienced, rather than their expert opinions on a topic. It is unclear whether Australian law enforcement will testify in this context. In a statement, a spokesperson for the Queensland Police Service (QPS) said it would not provide "further commentary" until Mr Day's trial was finalised. Mr Day, who has never been to Australia, had asked a US court to limit "inflammatory" information about the Wieambilla shooting and the assailants. His lawyers previously argued to exclude testimony by Australian law enforcement, arguing it would "simply distract, inflame and prejudice the jury and risks turning the trial into a referendum on the Trains".
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50832
Queensland police could give evidence at US trial of Donald Day Jr, conspiracy theorist linked to Wieambilla attack
Eden Gillespie - 1 April 2025
Details of a deadly attack on Queensland police will be aired during the trial of a conspiracy theorist in the United States charged in connection with the murders.
Arizona man Donald Day Jr regularly communicated with Gareth and Stacey Train who, along with Gareth's brother Nathaniel, fired relentlessly at officers who entered their rural Queensland property in December 2022.
Constables Rachel McCrow and Matthew Arnold, and a neighbour, Alan Dare, were killed in the shooting, which police labelled a religiously motivated terror attack.
Mr Day now faces a total of five federal charges in the US — three relating to alleged threats made online, and two accusing him of violating firearms laws.
US District Judge John J. Tuchi ruled this week that "fact witness testimony" would be allowed in the trial relating to the circumstances of the siege and why Queensland officers entered the Trains' property at Wieambilla.
Evidence by fact witnesses includes information about what they observed or experienced, rather than their expert opinions on a topic.
It is unclear whether Australian law enforcement will testify in this context.
In a statement, a spokesperson for the Queensland Police Service (QPS) said it would not provide "further commentary" until Mr Day's trial was finalised.
Jury will not be allowed to hear 'inflammatory' evidence
Mr Day, who has never been to Australia, had asked a US court to limit "inflammatory" information about the Wieambilla shooting and the assailants.
His lawyers previously argued to exclude testimony by Australian law enforcement, arguing it would "simply distract, inflame and prejudice the jury and risks turning the trial into a referendum on the Trains".
In court documents lodged this week, Mr Tuchi said the 60-year-old defendant had asked the court to limit evidence regarding the incident, arguing "the Wieambilla killings are simply inflammatory by their very nature".
He said the use of certain terms might be "factually accurate", they are "loaded and threaten the balance of the court's ruling by inviting the jury to focus on the horror of what the Trains did".
Evidence of communication between Mr Day and the Trains will be allowed to be presented in the trial where it relates to Mr Day's charges.
A haunting video message shared by Gareth and Stacey during the siege appeared to address Mr Day directly.
In the YouTube clip, a quietly spoken Stacey Train told "Don" they would "be home soon" and that they loved him.
Photographs of Trains' property to be shown
The court heard that four days after the attack, Mr Day also uploaded a video, which the US government alleges constituted a threat to kill any officer if they entered his Arizona property.
Judge Tuchi said the "discussions of a shared animus toward law enforcement and a desire to confront its agents, when stated or agreed to by [the] defendant, is relevant as to his intent and motive".
Some photographs of the Trains' front gate, roadway, "hide" and strategic positions will also be allowed to be shown.
Mr Day's lawyers had previously argued that "no evidence exists that Mr Day had any knowledge of the Trains plans or that he in any way encouraged or instigated the attack".
"Instead, the Trains actions were just that — their own," they said.
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-04-01/queensland-police-evidence-us-trial-donald-day-weambilla/105120672
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.51017
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22850665 (011024ZAPR25) Notable: Serious Accident:Prince Andrew accuser Virginia Giuffre says she has four days to live- Virginia Giuffre, the Perth based woman who received millions of dollars from Prince Andrew in a settlement linked to Jeffrey Epstein says she has four days to live. Ms Giuffre, 41, posted to Instagram that she had been involved in an accident with a school bus and that doctors had told her she was dying. Underneath a photo of herself covered in deep bruises, Ms Giuffre wrote she had been hit by the bus “driving 110km as we were slowing for a turn”. Ms Giuffre then said: “I’ve gone into kidney renal failure, they’ve given me four days to live, transferring me to a specialist hospital in urology. “I’m ready to go, just not until I see my babies one last time, but you know what they say about wishes.” She then added: “S- -t in one hand and wish in the other & I guarantee it’s still going to be s – t at the end of the day. Thank you all for being the wonderful people of the world and for being a great part of my life.” It is understood that Ms Giuffre had recently separated from her husband, Robert with whom she had been living with in North Perth. It is unclear where and when the crash happened. Ms Giuffre’s agent confirmed the accident. “Virginia has been in a serious accident and is receiving medical care in the hospital,’’ her spokesperson said. “She greatly appreciates the support and well-wishes people are sending.” Ms Giuffre’s father Sky Roberts told the UK Telegraph he was hoping she could obtain another medical opinion with different prognosis. “She’s not doing good,’’ he told the Telegraph. “ She’s depressed because she misses her kids. She’s got four days unless she gets another opinion from another doctor. “It could be that she could pass away in four days, like she said. But if she gets another doctor, they could probably do other things for her. So that’s all I’m waiting to hear. It’s terrible, I want to cry and everything else, but I want to stay strong for her just in case she needs something. Then I’ll be there for her.’’
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50979
Prince Andrew accuser Virginia Giuffre says she has four days to live
JACQUELIN MAGNAY - 1 April 2025
Virginia Giuffre, the Perth based woman who received millions of dollars from Prince Andrew in a settlement linked to Jeffrey Epstein says she has four days to live.
Ms Giuffre, 41, posted to Instagram that she had been involved in an accident with a school bus and that doctors had told her she was dying.
Underneath a photo of herself covered in deep bruises, Ms Giuffre wrote she had been hit by the bus “driving 110km as we were slowing for a turn”.
Ms Giuffre then said: “I’ve gone into kidney renal failure, they’ve given me four days to live, transferring me to a specialist hospital in urology.
“I’m ready to go, just not until I see my babies one last time, but you know what they say about wishes.”
She then added: “S – t in one hand and wish in the other & I guarantee it’s still going to be s – t at the end of the day. Thank you all for being the wonderful people of the world and for being a great part of my life.”
It is understood that Ms Giuffre had recently separated from her husband, Robert with whom she had been living with in North Perth.
It is unclear where and when the crash happened. Ms Giuffre’s agent confirmed the accident.
“Virginia has been in a serious accident and is receiving medical care in the hospital,’’ her spokesperson said.
“She greatly appreciates the support and well-wishes people are sending.”
Ms Giuffre’s father Sky Roberts told the UK Telegraph he was hoping she could obtain another medical opinion with different prognosis.
“She’s not doing good,’’ he told the Telegraph. “ She’s depressed because she misses her kids. She’s got four days unless she gets another opinion from another doctor.
“It could be that she could pass away in four days, like she said. But if she gets another doctor, they could probably do other things for her. So that’s all I’m waiting to hear.
“It’s terrible, I want to cry and everything else, but I want to stay strong for her just in case she needs something. Then I’ll be there for her.’’
Ms Giuffre received the settlement from Prince Andrew, reportedly more than A$20m after she sued him for damages in relation to her accusations of being sex trafficked by Jeffrey Epstein.
Andrew paid the money, without any admission of guilt or any apology, after the Queen wanted her Platinum Jubilee celebrations to go ahead without any courtroom distractions.
Ms Giuffre claimed she was aged 17 when Epstein organised for her to have sex with his friend Prince Andrew on three occasions back in 2001.
Prince Andrew has vehemently denied the allegations and says he has no recollection of meeting Ms Giuffre.
One of Andrew’s fiercest supporters, Lady Victoria Hervey, who once dated the prince, called on Ms Giuffre to supply a “full confession”.
She posted: “If Virginia Giuffre really does have days to live then a complete confession is needed. I don’t believe it though, the FBI are on her right now and arrest warrants are coming.”
Lady Victoria also called on Ms Giuffre’s estranged husband Robert to speak out about what he knows.
https://www.theaustralian.com.au/world/prince-andrew-accuser-virginia-giuffre-says-she-has-four-days-to-live/news-story/f624cdbe7288cd978fa7b37fca794778
https://www.instagram.com/virginiarobertsrising11/p/DH0vvDKzDvu/
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.51018
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22850679 (011035ZAPR25) Notable: Virginia Giuffre, Epstein and Prince Andrew accuser, in hospital after bus crash, spokesperson says - Virginia Giuffre, a prominent accuser of Jeffrey Epstein and Prince Andrew, says she has been in a serious crash and has "four days to live". Ms Giuffre shared a photo on social media of herself with bruises on her face and ECG electrodes, stating it had been the "worst start to the new year". She said in the post that she had been in a bus crash and had "four days to live" after doctors had told her she was suffering kidney and renal failure. "'I'm ready to go, just not until I see my babies one last time, but you know what they say about wishes," she said in the post. It is unclear where the crash occurred, however, recent social media posts say the 41-year-old has been in Perth, where she was known to be living in 2020. Her spokesperson, Dini von Mueffling, told the BBC: "Virginia has been in a serious accident and is receiving medical care in the hospital. She greatly appreciates the support and well wishes people are sending." Western Australian police earlier said they had not been able to locate a crash involving a bus and a car that occurred in the last few weeks. But at a press conference later on Tuesday morning, Acting Police Commissioner Kylie Whitely said there was a "minor" crash between a bus and a car in a rural area north of Perth on the afternoon of March 24. "We have no report of any serious injuries. But that is all that we have in relation to that matter," the acting commissioner said. She said she was not aware of passengers on the bus. In a subsequent statement, WA Police said the collision was reported by the bus driver the following day. "The car sustained approximately $2,000 worth of damage," the statement read. There were no reported injuries as a result of the crash. Police would not confirm if Ms Giuffre was the driver of the other vehicle.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>51017
Virginia Giuffre, Epstein and Prince Andrew accuser, in hospital after bus crash, spokesperson says
abc.net.au - 1 April 2025
Virginia Giuffre, a prominent accuser of Jeffrey Epstein and Prince Andrew, says she has been in a serious crash and has "four days to live".
Ms Giuffre shared a photo on social media of herself with bruises on her face and ECG electrodes, stating it had been the "worst start to the new year".
She said in the post that she had been in a bus crash and had "four days to live" after doctors had told her she was suffering kidney and renal failure.
"'I'm ready to go, just not until I see my babies one last time, but you know what they say about wishes," she said in the post.
It is unclear where the crash occurred, however, recent social media posts say the 41-year-old has been in Perth, where she was known to be living in 2020.
Her spokesperson, Dini von Mueffling, told the BBC: "Virginia has been in a serious accident and is receiving medical care in the hospital.
"She greatly appreciates the support and well wishes people are sending."
'Minor' bus crash
Western Australian police earlier said they had not been able to locate a crash involving a bus and a car that occurred in the last few weeks.
But at a press conference later on Tuesday morning, Acting Police Commissioner Kylie Whitely said there was a "minor" crash between a bus and a car in a rural area north of Perth on the afternoon of March 24.
"We have no report of any serious injuries. But that is all that we have in relation to that matter," the acting commissioner said.
She said she was not aware of passengers on the bus.
In a subsequent statement, WA Police said the collision was reported by the bus driver the following day.
"The car sustained approximately $2,000 worth of damage," the statement read.
There were no reported injuries as a result of the crash.
Police would not confirm if Ms Giuffre was the driver of the other vehicle.
St Johns WA also confirmed they were not called to any crash involving a bus in that location on March 24.
A spokesperson for WA's Public Transport Authority also said on Tuesday morning they were unaware of any such bus crashes.
They also confirmed school buses could only travel at a maximum speed of 95kph on any road.
A spokesperson for the East Metropolitan Health Service, which oversees Perth's major trauma hospital, Royal Perth Hospital, said Ms Giuffre was not at any of their facilities.
Father's 'spirit with you now'
Her father, Sky Roberts, commented on the post saying he was praying she got "correct treatment to live a long and healthy life".
"If there is anything in this world I can do to help you, please let me know. My spirit with you now and holding your hand," he said.
He told the UK Telegraph he was staying strong for her.
"She's not doing good. She's depressed because she misses her kids," he told the publication.
"She's got four days unless she gets another opinion from another doctor."
Ms Giuffre reached a settlement with Prince Andrew in 2022 after accusing him of sexually assaulting her in 2001 when she was 17.
Ms Giuffre said the prince forced her to have sex with him at the London home of Ghislaine Maxwell, a British socialite and longtime associate of Jeffrey Epstein, and at properties owned by Epstein.
Prince Andrew has repeatedly denied the allegations.
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-04-01/virginia-giuffre-epstein-accuser-in-serious-accident/105120486
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.51019
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22850692 (011040ZAPR25) Notable: Virginia Giuffre says she is in hospital after 'serious' car accident - Virginia Giuffre, one of Jeffrey Epstein's most prominent accusers, has said she is in hospital following a serious accident. Ms Giuffre posted on Instagram that she had suffered kidney failure after her car collided with a school bus, stating doctors had given her "four days to live" and were transferring her to a specialist hospital. In a statement shared with the BBC, her spokesperson Dini von Mueffling said: "Virginia has been in a serious accident and is receiving medical care in the hospital. She greatly appreciates the support and well wishes people are sending." Ms Giuffre said this year had "been the worst", alongside a photograph from a hospital bed showing visible bruising. The 41-year-old described the accident in an Instagram post, writing that the crash was so severe that her car "might as well be a tin can". "I'm ready to go, just not until I see my babies one last time," she added, seemingly referring to her three children. Ms Giuffre had recently been living with her children and husband Robert in the suburb of North Perth, Australia, though recent reports suggest the couple have split after 22 years of marriage. It remains unclear where and when the crash occurred. Both the Western Australia police and ambulance services told the BBC they had no records of such an accident happening in recent weeks. The police later specified that they had located records of a "minor crash" between a bus and a car on 24 March, but that no injuries had been reported as a result.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>51017
Virginia Giuffre says she is in hospital after 'serious' car accident
Rachel Hagan & Sofia Ferreira Santos - 1 April 2025
Virginia Giuffre, one of Jeffrey Epstein's most prominent accusers, has said she is in hospital following a serious accident.
Ms Giuffre posted on Instagram that she had suffered kidney failure after her car collided with a school bus, stating doctors had given her "four days to live" and were transferring her to a specialist hospital.
In a statement shared with the BBC, her spokesperson Dini von Mueffling said: "Virginia has been in a serious accident and is receiving medical care in the hospital. She greatly appreciates the support and well wishes people are sending."
Ms Giuffre said this year had "been the worst", alongside a photograph from a hospital bed showing visible bruising.
The 41-year-old described the accident in an Instagram post, writing that the crash was so severe that her car "might as well be a tin can".
"I'm ready to go, just not until I see my babies one last time," she added, seemingly referring to her three children.
Ms Giuffre had recently been living with her children and husband Robert in the suburb of North Perth, Australia, though recent reports suggest the couple have split after 22 years of marriage.
It remains unclear where and when the crash occurred.
Both the Western Australia police and ambulance services told the BBC they had no records of such an accident happening in recent weeks.
The police later specified that they had located records of a "minor crash" between a bus and a car on 24 March, but that no injuries had been reported as a result.
Ms Giuffre is best known for her allegations that Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell trafficked her to the Duke of York when she was 17.
Prince Andrew has denied all claims but reached an out-of-court settlement with her in 2022.
The settlement included a statement in which he expressed regret for his association with Epstein but contained no admission of liability or apology.
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c5yl5vle2nmo
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.51020
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22850714 (011050ZAPR25) Notable: Prince Andrew accuser claims to have ‘four days to live’ - Virginia Giuffre, one of Jeffrey Epstein’s victims who accused Prince Andrew of sexually assaulting her as a teenager, has claimed she is dying after being hit by a school bus. Ms Giuffre, 41, shared a picture from a hospital bed, covered in bruises. In the caption, she said a speeding bus collided with her car, and that doctors told her she has four days to live. Ms Giuffre used the post to express the wish to see her three children, whom she is believed to be estranged from. “I’ve gone into kidney renal failure, they’ve given me four days to live, transferring me to a specialist hospital in urology,” she wrote on Instagram. “I’m ready to go, just not until I see my babies one last time, but you know what they say about wishes,” she added. It is unclear where and when the apparent crash happened. A spokesperson for Ms Giuffre said: “Virginia has been in a serious accident and is receiving medical care in the hospital. She greatly appreciates the support and well wishes people are sending.” US-born Ms Giuffre had recently separated from her husband of 22 years Robert Giuffre and had been living in North Perth in Western Australia. Ms Giuffre alleged that she was sexually abused or raped by Prince Andrew on three separate occasions in 2001 when she was 17. She had sued him for unspecified damages. The case was settled by The Duke of York, who allegedly paid his accuser more than £12 million using money from the Queen. The terms of the deal have remained secret, but at the time, the Duke expressed regret about his friendship with Jeffrey Epstein and confirmed that he will make a “substantial donation” to Ms Giuffre’s charity in support of victims’ rights.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>51017
Prince Andrew accuser claims to have ‘four days to live’
Virginia Giuffre, one of Jeffrey Epstein’s victims, claims doctors have given her ‘four days to live’
Connor Stringer and Iona Cleave - 31 March 2025
Virginia Giuffre, one of Jeffrey Epstein’s victims who accused Prince Andrew of sexually assaulting her as a teenager, has claimed she is dying after being hit by a school bus.
Ms Giuffre, 41, shared a picture from a hospital bed, covered in bruises. In the caption, she said a speeding bus collided with her car, and that doctors told her she has four days to live.
Ms Giuffre used the post to express the wish to see her three children, whom she is believed to be estranged from.
“I’ve gone into kidney renal failure, they’ve given me four days to live, transferring me to a specialist hospital in urology,” she wrote on Instagram.
“I’m ready to go, just not until I see my babies one last time, but you know what they say about wishes,” she added.
It is unclear where and when the apparent crash happened.
Sky Roberts, Ms Giuffre’s father, told The Telegraph his daughter was depressed and wanted to be reunited with her children.
“She’s not doing good. She’s depressed because she misses her kids,” the retired engineer added. “She’s got four days [to live] unless she gets another opinion from another doctor.
“It could be that she could pass away in four days, like she said. But if she gets another doctor, they could probably do other things for her. So that’s all I’m waiting to hear.”
Mr Roberts said he was trying to “stay strong” for his daughter, whose last known address was with her estranged husband in Western Australia.
“It’s terrible, I want to cry and everything else but I want to stay strong for her just in case she needs something. Then I’ll be there for her,” he said, speaking from his home in Florida.
A spokesperson for Ms Giuffre said: “Virginia has been in a serious accident and is receiving medical care in the hospital. She greatly appreciates the support and well wishes people are sending.”
US-born Ms Giuffre had recently separated from her husband of 22 years Robert Giuffre and had been living in North Perth in Western Australia.
“S - t in one hand and wish in the other & I guarantee it’s still going to be s - t at the end of the day. Thank you all for being the wonderful people of the world and for being a great part of my life,” Ms Guiffre finished the post.
Ms Giuffre alleged that she was sexually abused or raped by Prince Andrew on three separate occasions in 2001 when she was 17. She had sued him for unspecified damages.
The case was settled by The Duke of York, who allegedly paid his accuser more than £12 million using money from the Queen.
The terms of the deal have remained secret, but at the time, the Duke expressed regret about his friendship with Jeffrey Epstein and confirmed that he will make a “substantial donation” to Ms Giuffre’s charity in support of victims’ rights.
It contained no admission of liability and no apology.
The Duke has always vehemently denied the allegations, insisting he has “no recollection” of meeting Ms Giuffre, who was trafficked by Epstein.
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/us/news/2025/03/31/prince-andrew-virginia-guiffre-hit-by-school-bus/
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.51021
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22850723 (011058ZAPR25) Notable: Virginia Giuffre's father's heartbreaking message to Epstein victim who has 'days to live' - The heartbroken father of Jeffrey Epstein victim Virginia Giuffre is begging his daughter to ‘hang on’ after she made the shocking announcement that she has just four days left to live. Sky Roberts told DailyMail.com that he is ‘sick to my stomach’ and would do anything to be able to fly from his home in Florida to be by his daughter’s hospital bedside in Australia following a horrific car crash. ‘I’m sick to my stomach. I feel like crying because I love my daughter more than life,’ he said. ‘If there’s anything I could do, I’d do it.’ In a gut-wrenching Instagram post late Sunday night, Giuffre announced that she had been given just four days to live after a school bus plowed into her car, leaving her with kidney renal failure. The 41-year-old - who was sex trafficked by late pedophile Jeffrey Epstein and his accomplice Ghislaine Maxwell, and accused Prince Andrew of sexually abusing her as a teen - wrote that she is ‘ready to go’ but just wants to see her children one final time. Roberts told DailyMail.com that the crash unfolded a couple of days ago in Australia. While he has not spoken with his daughter since the crash, his son - Giuffre’s brother - has been in regular contact with her over the past couple of days and has kept him updated as to her condition. ‘She's in really bad shape,’ he said. ‘She’s very depressed… there’s everything else she’s been going through with the divorce and not being able to see her kids.’ Roberts said that his son is ‘trying to get her spirits up so she doesn't just give up. I’m hoping she can hang on,’ he said. ‘She’s only 41. She’s got a lot of life to live. She's got a lot of things left to do - she’s helping people and helping other girls.’
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>51017
Virginia Giuffre's father's heartbreaking message to Epstein victim who has 'days to live'
RACHEL SHARP - 1 April 2025
1/2
The heartbroken father of Jeffrey Epstein victim Virginia Giuffre is begging his daughter to ‘hang on’ after she made the shocking announcement that she has just four days left to live.
Sky Roberts told DailyMail.com that he is ‘sick to my stomach’ and would do anything to be able to fly from his home in Florida to be by his daughter’s hospital bedside in Australia following a horrific car crash.
‘I’m sick to my stomach. I feel like crying because I love my daughter more than life,’ he said.
‘If there’s anything I could do, I’d do it.’
In a gut-wrenching Instagram post late Sunday night, Giuffre announced that she had been given just four days to live after a school bus plowed into her car, leaving her with kidney renal failure.
The 41-year-old - who was sex trafficked by late pedophile Jeffrey Epstein and his accomplice Ghislaine Maxwell, and accused Prince Andrew of sexually abusing her as a teen - wrote that she is ‘ready to go’ but just wants to see her children one final time.
Roberts told DailyMail.com that the crash unfolded a couple of days ago in Australia.
While he has not spoken with his daughter since the crash, his son - Giuffre’s brother - has been in regular contact with her over the past couple of days and has kept him updated as to her condition.
‘She's in really bad shape,’ he said.
‘She’s very depressed… there’s everything else she’s been going through with the divorce and not being able to see her kids.’
Roberts said that his son is ‘trying to get her spirits up so she doesn't just give up.’
‘I’m hoping she can hang on,’ he said.
‘She’s only 41. She’s got a lot of life to live. She's got a lot of things left to do - she’s helping people and helping other girls.’
Roberts revealed how helpless he feels being stuck at his home in Florida, without the money to be able to hop on a plane to Australia to be with her in this time of need.
‘There’s nothing I can do from here,’ he said.
‘I’m on Social Security so I can’t fly out. I'd love to be by her side and support her.’
As well as begging his daughter not to give up, Roberts made a public plea for her to get a second medical opinion from doctors.
‘She needs to get a second opinion,’ he said.
‘When someone tells you, you’re going to die in four days, you don't want to hear from just that person. You need to get a second opinion. You need a third opinion.’
Roberts said he used to be ‘really close’ with his daughter but their relationship had become strained in recent years.
That said, he only has good memories.
‘I remember all the great times I’ve had with her here - her growing up and putting her in horse shows and all the fun things we used to do,’ he said.
‘All you can do when someone is in a bad way is think of the good times. You don’t want to think of any bad times.’
Roberts told DailyMail.com that his daughter has also become recently estranged from her three children as she is in the middle of a messy divorce with her husband of two decades, Robert Giuffre.
He said he hopes that her wish to be able to see her children again comes true.
Since December 2020, Giuffre has lived in Australia with her now-estranged husband and their three children.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.51022
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22850745 (011111ZAPR25) Notable: Prince Andrew’s ex issues scathing response to Virginia Giuffre’s claim she has ‘days to live’ - Prince Andrew’s ex-girlfriend Lady Victoria Hervey issued a brutal response to his sexual assault accuser Virginia Giuffre claiming she has “days to live” after allegedly being hit by a school bus. Hervey took to her Instagram Story Monday to repost a photo of Giuffre lying bruised in a hospital bed, writing, “KARMA.” She then claimed Giuffre needed to make “a complete confession” after she sued Andrew in 2021 for allegedly raping her when she was 17 as part of Jeffrey Epstein’s sex trafficking ring. Hervey, 48, also said she doesn’t believe Giuffre, 41, is dying. Without any evidence, Hervey claimed, “Hearing from reliable sources it is thought that the FBI went to her recently with evidence/proof that she lied with recordings where she admits nothing ever happened with Prince Andrew. “She’s conveniently dying to evade jail.” The socialite then pleaded for Virginia’s husband, Robert Giuffre, to speak up. “I know he knows the truth of the fake photos and all her con jobs,” Hervey claimed, without citing any proof. Hervey further questioned Virginia’s claim about the bus crash leading to kidney failure. She also pointed to Virginia’s jewelry and the fact that she wasn’t wearing a hospital gown as reasons for her skepticism. “I mean, she is the Queen of the fake photo after all,” Hervey claimed. “Hence I’m such a skeptic and don’t believe in jumping to any conclusions right away from a visual.” A rep for Virginia did not immediately respond to Page Six’s request for comment on Hervey’s allegations.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>51017
Prince Andrew’s ex issues scathing response to Virginia Giuffre’s claim she has ‘days to live’
Vanessa Serna - March 31, 2025
Prince Andrew’s ex-girlfriend Lady Victoria Hervey issued a brutal response to his sexual assault accuser Virginia Giuffre claiming she has “days to live” after allegedly being hit by a school bus.
Hervey took to her Instagram Story Monday to repost a photo of Giuffre lying bruised in a hospital bed, writing, “KARMA.”
She then claimed Giuffre needed to make “a complete confession” after she sued Andrew in 2021 for allegedly raping her when she was 17 as part of Jeffrey Epstein’s sex trafficking ring.
Hervey, 48, also said she doesn’t believe Giuffre, 41, is dying.
Without any evidence, Hervey claimed, “Hearing from reliable sources it is thought that the FBI went to her recently with evidence/proof that she lied with recordings where she admits nothing ever happened with Prince Andrew.
“She’s conveniently dying to evade jail.”
The socialite then pleaded for Virginia’s husband, Robert Giuffre, to speak up.
“I know he knows the truth of the fake photos and all her con jobs,” Hervey claimed, without citing any proof.
Hervey further questioned Virginia’s claim about the bus crash leading to kidney failure.
She also pointed to Virginia’s jewelry and the fact that she wasn’t wearing a hospital gown as reasons for her skepticism.
“I mean, she is the Queen of the fake photo after all,” Hervey claimed. “Hence I’m such a skeptic and don’t believe in jumping to any conclusions right away from a visual.”
A rep for Virginia did not immediately respond to Page Six’s request for comment on Hervey’s allegations.
Over the weekend, Virginia shared a grisly selfie via Instagram of herself with apparent injuries.
“When a school bus driver comes at you driving 110km as we were slowing for a turn that no matter what your car is made of it might as well be a tin can,” she captioned the photo.
“I’ve gone into kidney renal failure, they’ve given me four days to live, transferring me to a specialist hospital in urology.”
Andrew denied any wrongdoing when Virginia sued him for rape in 2021.
However, the Duke of York settled the lawsuit the following year and Virginia was reportedly awarded $12 million.
At the time, Andrew was stripped of his military titles and patronages by his mother, Queen Elizabeth II.
https://pagesix.com/2025/03/31/royal-family/prince-andrews-ex-issues-scathing-response-to-virginia-giuffres-claim-she-has-days-to-live/
https://www.instagram.com/ladyvictoriahervey/
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.51023
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22850751 (011118ZAPR25) Notable: Q Post #4923 - https://twitter.com/VRSVirginia/status/1319071346282778624 - Dearest Virginia - We stand with you. Now and always. Find peace through prayer. Never give up the good fight. God bless you. Q - https://qanon.pub/#4923 - https://qanon.pub/#1054 - https://qanon.pub/#4568 - https://qanon.pub/#4728
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>51017
Q Post #4923
Oct 21 2020 20:55:05 (EST)
https://twitter.com/VRSVirginia/status/1319071346282778624
Dearest Virginia -
We stand with you.
Now and always.
Find peace through prayer.
Never give up the good fight.
God bless you.
Q
https://qanon.pub/#4923
https://qanon.pub/#1054
https://qanon.pub/#4568
https://qanon.pub/#4728
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.51024
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22855449 (020922ZAPR25) Notable: Chinese state media praises Anthony Albanese, accuses Peter Dutton of ‘beating the drums of war’ Chinese state media has accused Peter Dutton of “beating ‘the drums of war’ against China” and praised Anthony Albanese for speaking the “truth”, as Beijing said it maintains a position of “noninterference” in elections after a Chinese deep sea research vessel sailed into the Australian campaign. The passage of the Tan Suo Yi Hao, a Chinese research vessel, along the south coast of Australia has been the centre of a loud debate during the first week of the election campaign, with the Opposition leader accusing the Prime Minister of a “wet lettuce” response. Security analysts warn the vessel has dual purpose military applications and was likely studying Australia’s undersea oceanography for the benefit of the PLA navy. In his initial response on Monday, the Prime Minister said he “would prefer that it wasn’t there”, but noted that Australian navy ships routinely operate in the South China Sea and in the Taiwan Strait. Chinese researchers praised the Australian Prime Minister’s approach. “Albanese spoke the truth, while to some extent highlighting the double standards of some Australian politicians and media,” Xu Shanpin, an adjunct research fellow at the China University of Mining and Technology, told the Global Times. In contrast, the Global Times said Mr Dutton was exploiting the issue for political gain ahead of the election. “For the opposition, especially its leader Dutton, this election could be his last chance to run for office. That’s why Dutton has begun beating ‘the drums of war’ against China again,” the state masthead said.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50833
>>51009
>>51012
Chinese state media praises Anthony Albanese, accuses Peter Dutton of ‘beating the drums of war’
WILL GLASGOW - 2 April 2025
1/2
Chinese state media has accused Peter Dutton of “beating ‘the drums of war’ against China” and praised Anthony Albanese for speaking the “truth”, as Beijing said it maintains a position of “noninterference” in elections after a Chinese deep sea research vessel sailed into the Australian campaign.
The passage of the Tan Suo Yi Hao, a Chinese research vessel, along the south coast of Australia has been the centre of a loud debate during the first week of the election campaign, with the Opposition leader accusing the Prime Minister of a “wet lettuce” response. Security analysts warn the vessel has dual purpose military applications and was likely studying Australia’s undersea oceanography for the benefit of the PLA navy.
Asked on Wednesday afternoon about the praise from Beijing, Mr Albanese said: “I stand up for Australia’s national interest. That’s what I do each and every day.”
Earlier in the day, the Prime Minister accused the Opposition Leader of “hypocrisy”, noting the Coalition government’s greenlighting of the sale of the Port of Darwin to a Chinese company and a visit by the PLA Navy to Sydney Harbour in 2019.
“If Peter Dutton had been in Kirribilli House - those harbourside views he wants so much - he could have looked out the window and seen a Chinese naval ship at Garden Island,” Mr Albanese said.
The Opposition Leader on Wednesday continued to criticise the Prime Minister for “projecting weakness”, arguing that the Australian Defence Force – not the Border Force – should be monitoring the Chinese research ship as it circumnavigates Australia.
“We’ve got the Prime Minister saying one thing, the Defence Minister saying another about whether it’s Border Force or whether it’s Defence or who’s got the lead here and who’s providing the surveillance,” Mr Dutton told Sky News.
In a statement released on Wednesday afternoon, a spokesman at China’s Embassy in Canberra said Chinese diplomats had maintained “close communication” with Australian officials about the vessel.
The Chinese embassy spokesman criticised Australian media reporting for “smearing” the research activities of the vessel, which it said had “nothing to do with China-Australia relations, let alone the Australian federal election”.
“China always upholds the principle of noninterference in other countries’ internal affairs, and does not want to participate in, interfere with, or comment on Australia’s election,” the Chinese embassy spokesman said.
In a pointed piece published overnight, Beijing’s Global Times said Australian paranoia and political opportunism were “hijacking” the relationship.
“Some Australian politicians just don’t get it. They try to block the improvement of China-Australia relations, constantly spewing harmful rhetoric and hijacking the relationship, only for their personal benefit,” the Chinese state owned masthead editorialised.
“China is not a threat. On this point, Australia can sleep soundly. It does not have to be this paranoid,” the state media masthead wrote.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.51025
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22855458 (020926ZAPR25) Notable: Australia’s paranoia over China’s research vessel unfounded, it doesn’t have to be this way - "Over the past two days, Australia has been paranoid about a Chinese research vessel that appeared off the coast of South Australia. In Australian media's portrayal, what was originally a harmless research ship has, for no clear reason, been transformed into a "spy ship." Sky News Australia claimed that "a Chinese spy ship spotted off the coast of South Australia has been accused of mapping Australia's submarine cables for 'future operations.'" The Australian published a more blatant headline, "China spy ship has Labor all at sea." But how can anyone be sure this ship is a "spy"? According to these media outlets, the answer is: The vessel is CONSIDERED a "spy ship," as "the PLA WOULD be vitally interested in undersea oceanography off the Australian coast." In other words, the accusation is nothing more than unfounded speculation. Some Australian politicians just don't get it. They try to block the improvement of China-Australia relations, constantly spewing harmful rhetoric and hijacking the relationship, only for their personal benefit. That's the real threat to Australia - not the research vessel from China. A better relationship with China will bring invaluable benefits to Australia. However, the key lies in managing the balance between China, Australia, and the US; Canberra cannot simply reap economic benefits from China while aligning with the US to undermine China's core interests. This is not an unreasonable expectation. But one thing is certain, China is not a threat. On this point, Australia can sleep soundly. It does not have to be this paranoid."- Global Times - globaltimes.cn
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50833
>>51009
>>51012
>>51024
Australia’s paranoia over China’s research vessel unfounded, it doesn’t have to be this way
Global Times - Apr 01, 2025
Over the past two days, Australia has been paranoid about a Chinese research vessel that appeared off the coast of South Australia. In Australian media's portrayal, what was originally a harmless research ship has, for no clear reason, been transformed into a "spy ship."
It started with the Chinese research vessel, Tan Suo Yi Hao (Discovery One) being spotted "traveling along Australia's southern coastline, outside of Australia's exclusive economic zone," according to Australia media. A Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson noted on Monday that "China carries out normal activities at sea in accordance with international law, including United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea. We hope Australia will have a right understanding of this and stop the groundless suspicion and speculations." However, on Tuesday, the tone of Australian media reports became increasingly exaggerated.
Sky News Australia claimed that "a Chinese spy ship spotted off the coast of South Australia has been accused of mapping Australia's submarine cables for 'future operations.'" The Australian published a more blatant headline, "China spy ship has Labor all at sea."
But how can anyone be sure this ship is a "spy"? According to these media outlets, the answer is: The vessel is CONSIDERED a "spy ship," as "the PLA WOULD be vitally interested in undersea oceanography off the Australian coast." In other words, the accusation is nothing more than unfounded speculation.
Xu Shanpin, an adjunct research fellow at the China University of Mining and Technology, believes the nature of Tan Suo Yi Hao has been confirmed by the New Zealand side and even some Western media outlets. The Guardian noted that "Tan Suo Yi Hao was in New Zealand as part of an eight-nation scientific venture and helped New Zealand scientists reach the bottom of the Puysegur trench for the first time, according to local media." It quoted a New Zealand biologist as saying that "the vessel enabled scientists to reach locations previously out of reach."
Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese also said that "We live in circumstances where just as Australia has vessels in the South China Sea, and vessels in the Taiwan Straits and a range of areas, this vessel is there." Albanese spoke the truth, while to some extent highlighting the double standards of some Australian politicians and media - while Australia allows its own vessels to demonstrate military presence in the Taiwan Straits and the South China Sea, they cannot tolerate Chinese ships entering international waters near Australia's coastline; and for them, anything related to China can easily be framed as a "security" issue, Xu told the Global Times.
Unsurprisingly, Albanese's remarks have drawn criticism from the opposition party and some media outlets. Peter Dutton, leader of the opposition, accused him of "weakness" on national security. The real issue isn't that "China's research vessel poses any actual threat," but rather the timing - just ahead of Australia's national election in early May. For the opposition, especially its leader Dutton, this election could be his last chance to run for office. That's why Dutton has begun beating "the drums of war" against China again. The "China threat" narrative has become almost his only political tool to challenge the Labor Party and Albanese, Yu Lei, a professor from the Department of International Politics and Economics at Shandong University, told the Global Times.
In February, Chinese Ambassador to Australia Xiao Qian wrote that "China and Australia are comprehensive strategic partners. The term 'partner' indicates that the two countries are friends, not rivals." There are also clear-eyed Australian scholars and former politicians who point out that China has never been a threat to Australia. They say that Australia is absolutely a beneficiary of China's economic development.
Some Australian politicians just don't get it. They try to block the improvement of China-Australia relations, constantly spewing harmful rhetoric and hijacking the relationship, only for their personal benefit. That's the real threat to Australia - not the research vessel from China.
A better relationship with China will bring invaluable benefits to Australia. However, the key lies in managing the balance between China, Australia, and the US; Canberra cannot simply reap economic benefits from China while aligning with the US to undermine China's core interests. This is not an unreasonable expectation.
But one thing is certain, China is not a threat. On this point, Australia can sleep soundly. It does not have to be this paranoid.
https://www.globaltimes.cn/page/202504/1331355.shtml
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.51026
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22855500 (020947ZAPR25) Notable: Virginia Giuffre says she mistakenly posted claim that she has four days left to live to Instagram as she reveals new details of car crash - Jeffrey Epstein victim Virginia Giuffre has said she mistakenly posted the claim that she had just four days left to live to her public Instagram. Ms Giuffre, 41, sparked concerns across the globe when she shared a photo of her 'battered and bruised' claiming she was dying after being hit by a school bus. The snap seemed to have been taken from a hospital bed, and Ms Giuffre said a speeding vehicle had ploughed into her car and that doctors had told her she has four days to live. Today she issued a statement after her post triggered an outpouring of concern for her welfare, as well as questions about the circumstances of a 'car crash' that caused her injuries and 'kidney failure'. The statement said: "Virginia thanks everyone for the outpouring of love and support. She is overwhelmed with gratitude. Today she remains in serious condition while receiving medical care. On March 24, in rural Western Australia, a school bus hit the car in which she was riding. The police were called but said that there was no one available to come to the scene. They asked if anyone was injured and suggested that if they were, they should make their way to the hospital. The school bus driver had a bus full of distraught children and left the scene to get them back, saying he would file a police report, which he did later. Virginia was banged up and bruised and returned home. Virginia's condition worsened and she was admitted to the hospital. Concerning her Instagram post, Virginia thought that she had posted on her private Facebook page. Virginia and her family thank everyone for their concern." She is currently being treated at Sir Charles Gardiner Hospital in Perth, Australia.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>51017
Virginia Giuffre says she mistakenly posted claim that she has four days left to live to Instagram as she reveals new details of car crash
FREYA BARNES - 2 April 2025
1/3
Jeffrey Epstein victim Virginia Giuffre has said she mistakenly posted the claim that she had just four days left to live to her public Instagram.
Ms Giuffre, 41, sparked concerns across the globe when she shared a photo of her 'battered and bruised' claiming she was dying after being hit by a school bus.
The snap seemed to have been taken from a hospital bed, and Ms Giuffre said a speeding vehicle had ploughed into her car and that doctors had told her she has four days to live.
Today she issued a statement after her post triggered an outpouring of concern for her welfare, as well as questions about the circumstances of a 'car crash' that caused her injuries and 'kidney failure'.
The statement said: 'Virginia thanks everyone for the outpouring of love and support. She is overwhelmed with gratitude.
'Today she remains in serious condition while receiving medical care. On March 24, in rural Western Australia, a school bus hit the car in which she was riding.
'The police were called but said that there was no one available to come to the scene.
'They asked if anyone was injured and suggested that if they were, they should make their way to the hospital.
'The school bus driver had a bus full of distraught children and left the scene to get them back, saying he would file a police report, which he did later.
'Virginia was banged up and bruised and returned home. Virginia's condition worsened and she was admitted to the hospital.
'Concerning her Instagram post, Virginia thought that she had posted on her private Facebook page.
'Virginia and her family thank everyone for their concern.'
She is currently being treated at Sir Charles Gardiner Hospital in Perth, Australia.
On Sunday, Ms Giuffre, née Roberts, shared a concerning selfie from a hospital bed to her Instagram which showed her severely bruised face and upper body.
The mother - who was trafficked by Jeffrey Epstein and alleged she was sexually assaulted as a teenager by Prince Andrew - said she was suffering from kidney failure after the crash.
She also begged to see her children 'one last time' before she dies after claiming doctors said she had just four days to live.
The full caption on her 'accidental' post read: 'This year has been the worst start to a new year, but I won't bore any one with the details but I think it's important to note that when a school bus driver comes at your driving 110km as we were slowing for a turn that no matter what your car is made of it might as well be a tin can.
'I've gone into kidney renal failure, they've given me four days to live, transferring me to a specialist hospital in urology. I'm ready to go, just not until I see my babies one last time, but you know what the say about wishes. S - T in one hand and wish in the other & I guarantee it's still going to be s - t at the end of the day.
'Thank you all for being the wonderful people of the world and for being a great part of my life. Godbless you all xx Virginia.'
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.51027
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22855527 (021002ZAPR25) Notable: Alleged Epstein victim Virginia Giuffre charged with breaching a family violence restraining order - Virginia Giuffre appeared in court for allegedly breaching a family violence restraining order just days before claiming she had days to live following a bus crash. The alleged breach happened in early February and Ms Giuffre’s first appearance at the Magistrates Court in Joondalup, WA, was on March 14. No plea was entered at the hearing and the matter is next listed for April 9. Ms Giuffre’s estranged husband Robert, 49, is also facing separate charges. WA Court lists show the police charged Mr Giuffre for an inadequate storage facility for firearms in February this year and reckless driving exceeding the speed limit by 45km/h or more on a length of road in September last year. For the reckless driving charge, Robert was fined $1200 and lost his license for six months. The charge against Ms Giuffre hit the courts just days before she generated headlines following a bizarre bus crash incident. Ms Giuffre, 41, posted a photo of herself to Instagram with severe bruising to her face. She said she had been involved in a bus crash and had just “four days to live”.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>51017
>>51026
Alleged Epstein victim Virginia Giuffre charged with breaching a family violence restraining order
Alleged Jeffrey Epstein victim Virginia Giuffre appeared in court charged with breaching a family violence order just days before she made headlines following a bus crash.
Duncan Evans - April 2, 2025
Virginia Giuffre appeared in court for allegedly breaching a family violence restraining order just days before claiming she had days to live following a bus crash.
The alleged breach happened in early February and Ms Giuffre’s first appearance at the Magistrates Court in Joondalup, WA, was on March 14.
No plea was entered at the hearing and the matter is next listed for April 9.
Ms Giuffre’s estranged husband Robert, 49, is also facing separate charges.
WA Court lists show the police charged Mr Giuffre for an inadequate storage facility for firearms in February this year and reckless driving exceeding the speed limit by 45km/h or more on a length of road in September last year.
For the reckless driving charge, Robert was fined $1200 and lost his license for six months.
Ms Giuffre was allegedly trafficked by pedophile Jeffrey Epstein and has accused Prince Andrew, a member of the British Royal Family, of sexually assaulting her when she was 17.
She claimed Prince Andrew forced her to have sex with him at the London home of Ghislaine Maxwell, a longtime associate of Epstein, who was found guilty in 2021 of trafficking underage girls.
Ms Giuffre’s civil case against Prince Andrew was settled in 2022.
Prince Andrew has denied all allegations of wrongdoing.
The charge against Ms Giuffre hit the courts just days before she generated headlines following a bizarre bus crash incident.
Ms Giuffre, 41, posted a photo of herself to Instagram with severe bruising to her face.
She said she had been involved in a bus crash and had just “four days to live”.
“This year has been the worst start to a new year, but I won’t bore anyone with the details but I think it important to note than when a school bus driver comes at you driving 110km as we were slowing for a turn that no matter what your car is made of it might as well be a tin can,” she wrote.
“I’ve gone into kidney renal failure, they’ve given me four days to live, transferring me to a specialist hospital in urology.
“I’m ready to go, just not until I see my babies one last time.”
Details of the bus crash are scant, however, and WA Police Acting Commissioner Kylie Whitely has said there was a minor crash between a bus and a car in a rural area near Perth on March 24.
Police and St John WA Ambulance have stated nobody was taken to hospital following the crash and no-one suffered serious injuries.
“The collision was reported by the bus driver the following day,” the police said.
“The car sustained approximately $2000 worth of damage.
“There were no reported injuries as a result of the crash.”
Ms Giuffre’s agent has since released a statement on the crash, saying the Perth-based mother-of-three thought she was sharing the post to a private social media account.
“Today she remains in serious condition while receiving medical care,” the statement reads.
“On March 24, in rural Western Australia, a school bus hit the car in which she was riding.
“The police were called but said that there was no one available to come to the scene.
“They asked if anyone was injured and suggested that if they were, they should make their way to the hospital.
“The school bus driver had a bus full of distraught children and left the scene to get them back, saying he would file a police report, which he did later.
“Virginia was banged up and bruised and returned home.
“Virginia’s condition worsened and she was admitted to the hospital.”
Ms Giuffre is reportedly divorced from her husband Robert.
In an Instagram post from March 22, Ms Giuffre shared photos of her children and suggested she was unable to see them.
“My beautiful babies have no clue how much I love them,” she wrote.
“I miss them so very much. I have been through hell and back in my 41 years but this is incredibly hurting me worse than anything else.
“My heart is shattered and every day that passes my sadness only deepens.”
https://www.news.com.au/national/western-australia/alleged-epstein-victim-virginia-giuffre-charged-with-breaching-a-family-violence-restraining-order/news-story/e2649b145f79006c79b3ecce7c48c273
https://www.instagram.com/virginiarobertsrising11/p/DHfzrupSu60/?img_index=1
>Dearest Virginia -
>We stand with you.
>Now and always.
>Find peace through prayer.
>Never give up the good fight.
>God bless you.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.51028
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22860237 (030925ZAPR25) Notable: Trump tariffs:Australia hit with 10 per cent tariffs on ‘Liberation Day’- Donald Trump has declared that America’s friends were often worse than its enemies when it came to reciprocal trade, as he justified his new wave of tariffs on Thursday. Speaking in the Rose Garden at the White House on Wednesday local time, the US President declared “we are not taking it anymore” and that April 2 would be remembered as the day America reclaimed its destiny and US industry was reborn. He confirmed the reciprocal tariffs would commence from Friday local time, saying America would “calculate the combined rate of all their tariffs, non-monetary barriers and other forms of cheating”. The official start date for the new regime, as confirmed by the White House, is 12.01am (local time) April 5, 2025. A White House statement said the tariffs would remain in place “until such a time as President Trump determines that the threat posed by the trade deficit and underlying non-reciprocal treatment is satisfied, resolved or mitigated”. Mr Trump will be able to “increase the tariff if trading partners retaliate or decrease the tariffs if trading partners take significant steps to remedy non-reciprocal trade agreements and align with the United States on economic and national security matters”. The President said America was being “very kind” because he would charge other nations “approximately half of what they are and have been charging us”. He said imposing a full reciprocal tariff would have been “tough for a lot of countries”. Mr Trump warned that, for decades, America had been “looted, pillaged and raped”, and that other nations had become rich and powerful at its expense. “Now it’s our turn to prosper,” he said. Mr Trump said the revenue raised as a result of the new tariffs would go towards reducing taxes and paying down the national debt.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50833
>>50785
Australia hit with 10 per cent tariffs on ‘Liberation Day’
JOE KELLY - 3 April 2024
1/2
Donald Trump has declared that America’s friends were often worse than its enemies when it came to reciprocal trade, as he justified his new wave of tariffs on Thursday.
Speaking in the Rose Garden at the White House on Wednesday local time, the US President declared “we are not taking it anymore” and that April 2 would be remembered as the day America reclaimed its destiny and US industry was reborn.
He confirmed the reciprocal tariffs would commence from Friday local time, saying America would “calculate the combined rate of all their tariffs, non-monetary barriers and other forms of cheating”.
The official start date for the new regime, as confirmed by the White House, is 12.01am (local time) April 5, 2025. A White House statement said the tariffs would remain in place “until such a time as President Trump determines that the threat posed by the trade deficit and underlying non-reciprocal treatment is satisfied, resolved or mitigated”.
Mr Trump will be able to “increase the tariff if trading partners retaliate or decrease the tariffs if trading partners take significant steps to remedy non-reciprocal trade agreements and align with the United States on economic and national security matters”.
The President said America was being “very kind” because he would charge other nations “approximately half of what they are and have been charging us”.
He said imposing a full reciprocal tariff would have been “tough for a lot of countries”.
Mr Trump warned that, for decades, America had been “looted, pillaged and raped”, and that other nations had become rich and powerful at its expense.
“Now it’s our turn to prosper,” he said.
Mr Trump said the revenue raised as a result of the new tariffs would go towards reducing taxes and paying down the national debt.
He argued that jobs and factories would come “roaring back” into America, and that his policies would supercharge the US industrial base. He also took aim at the “vicious attacks” American workers had suffered as a result of foreign trade barriers.
“We will pry open foreign markets and break down foreign trade barriers, and ultimately more production at home will mean stronger competition at lower prices for consumers,” he said.
Mr Trump revealed that his administration would establish a new “minimum baseline tariff of 10 per cent” that would apply to other countries “to help rebuild our economy and to prevent cheating”.
“Foreign nations will finally be asked to pay for the privilege of access to our market, the biggest market in the world,” he said.
The White House confirmed that Mr Trump was “invoking his authority under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act of 1977” to address a “national emergency posed by the large and persistent trade deficit”.
It warned that the trade deficit was driven by the “absence of reciprocity in our trade relationships and other harmful policies like currency manipulation and exorbitant value-added taxes perpetuated by other countries”.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.51029
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22860250 (030936ZAPR25) Notable: Video: Anthony Albanese slams US President Donald Trump tariffs as ‘unjustified’ - Anthony Albanese has slammed new tariffs announced by the US Trump administration while ruling out applying reciprocal measures, and announcing a suite of actions to safeguard industry against a more difficult global trading environment. The Prime Minister responded to Donald Trump’s announcement on Thursday AEDT that the US would impose a 10 per cent, across-the-board tariff on all imports. Mr Albanese flatly rejected the US assertion Australia applied anything equivalent to a 10 per cent tariff on the US, and said the imposition of tariffs was “unjustified”, “have no basis in logic”, and “not the act of a friend”. “Today’s decision will add to uncertainty in the global economy and it will push up costs for American households,” he said. “It is the American people who will pay the biggest price for these unjustified tariffs. “This is why our government will not be seeking to impose reciprocal tariffs. “We will not join a race to the bottom that leads to higher prices and slower growth. “We will stand up for Australia. We will continue to make the strongest case for these unjustified tariffs to be removed from our exporters.”
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50833
>>51028
Anthony Albanese slams US President Donald Trump tariffs as ‘unjustified’
NOAH YIM and RICHARD FERGUSON - 3 April 2025
1/2
Anthony Albanese has slammed new tariffs announced by the US Trump administration while ruling out applying reciprocal measures, and announcing a suite of actions to safeguard industry against a more difficult global trading environment.
The Prime Minister responded to Donald Trump’s announcement on Thursday AEDT that the US would impose a 10 per cent, across-the-board tariff on all imports.
United States officials have assured Australia beef imports will not be banned, despite this being suggested by Donald Trump.
After Anthony Albanese could not categorically say whether beef imports had been banned, the government received advice from Australia’s embassy in Washington that beef exports into the US would be allowed to continue but would be hit with a 10 per cent tariff.
Mr Albanese flatly rejected the US assertion Australia applied anything equivalent to a 10 per cent tariff on the US, and said the imposition of tariffs was “unjustified”, “have no basis in logic”, and “not the act of a friend”.
“Today’s decision will add to uncertainty in the global economy and it will push up costs for American households,” he said.
“It is the American people who will pay the biggest price for these unjustified tariffs.
“This is why our government will not be seeking to impose reciprocal tariffs.
“We will not join a race to the bottom that leads to higher prices and slower growth.
“We will stand up for Australia. We will continue to make the strongest case for these unjustified tariffs to be removed from our exporters.”
Mr Albanese, addressing a press conference in Melbourne, delivered a veiled swipe at Mr Trump’s handling of economics, saying he understood in Year 7 that border taxes hurt the country that impose them more.
Mr Trump has been advocating for a return to a high tariffs regime for nearly 40 years as a public figure in America, and on Thursday argued again that jobs and factories would come “roaring back” into America as his policies supercharge the US industrial base.
But Mr Albanese said he understood from early schooling that tariffs damaged the countries who imposed them, more than the nations targeted with the taxes.
“We can’t control what the US administration determines we can engage with them. This is a decision that they have made. It’s one which we think, importantly, is not in the interests of the United States … tariffs impact the country that is imposing them. And Australians need to understand that,” he said.
“I think that there is a debate that, frankly, I thought had gone away from my Year 7 economics class at school.
“Didn’t have to go to uni and get an economics degree to get that, but there appears to be a debate about that.
“It produces higher costs for the country that’s imposing the tariffs, which is why we’re not responding by lifting up our tariffs and by therefore having an inflationary impact. So it’s important that Australians get that as well.”
He said the latest information suggests there will be a 10 per cent tariff across the board for Australian exports with no special barrier on Australian beef.
“Our understanding is that it applies across the board,” Mr Albanese said. “Our understanding is that there is a, I heard President Trump’s comments that were made.
“Our understanding at this point is that that is a 10 per cent tariff across the board, but we have come here to give you the respect of an immediate response. We’ll await further discussions with the US administration.”
He stressed that the US only accounted for “less than five per cent” of Australia’s export market, and vowed to stand up for the Australian community.
“Our government will always stand up for Australian jobs, Australian industry, Australian consumers, and Australian values,” he said.
“That is why we have been crystal-clear with the United States about what is not up for negotiation. Australia is a great trading nation. One-in-four of our jobs depend on trade but we’ll never trade away the things which make us the best country in the world.”
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.51030
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22860263 (030945ZAPR25) Notable: Albanese threatens to use 'dispute resolution' powers against sweeping US tariffs - Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has threatened to use "dispute resolution" powers in Australia's free trade agreement with the United States, responding to President Donald Trump's baseline 10 per cent tariff imposed on Australian exports to the US. "The Australian people have every right to view this action by the Trump administration as undermining our free and fair trading relationship," Mr Albanese said. "Our existing free trade agreement with the United States contains dispute resolution mechanisms. We want to resolve this issue without resorting to using these." The ABC revealed yesterday that the Albanese government was preparing to take the US to the World Trade Organization to accuse it of breaching their trade agreement. United States President Donald Trump has confirmed a new round of sweeping tariffs, setting a baseline on all trading nations including 10 per cent on Australian goods including beef. The Trump administration is labelling the taxes as "reciprocal" measures in response to trade barriers - and earlier this week issued a grievance list that complained Australia's biosecurity laws limited the United States from exporting fresh beef, pork and poultry products to Australia. "We imported $[US]3 billion of Australian beef from them just last year alone. They won't take any of our beef," Mr Trump said in his 'liberation day' address. "They don't want it because they don't want it to affect their farmers and, you know, I don't blame them - but we're doing the same thing right now, starting at midnight tonight, I would say."
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50833
>>51028
Albanese threatens to use 'dispute resolution' powers against sweeping US tariffs
Jake Evans - 3 April 2025
1/2
Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has threatened to use "dispute resolution" powers in Australia's free trade agreement with the United States, responding to President Donald Trump's baseline 10 per cent tariff imposed on Australian exports to the US.
"The Australian people have every right to view this action by the Trump administration as undermining our free and fair trading relationship," Mr Albanese said.
"Our existing free trade agreement with the United States contains dispute resolution mechanisms. We want to resolve this issue without resorting to using these."
The ABC revealed yesterday that the Albanese government was preparing to take the US to the World Trade Organization to accuse it of breaching their trade agreement.
United States President Donald Trump has confirmed a new round of sweeping tariffs, setting a baseline on all trading nations including 10 per cent on Australian goods including beef.
The Trump administration is labelling the taxes as "reciprocal" measures in response to trade barriers — and earlier this week issued a grievance list that complained Australia's biosecurity laws limited the United States from exporting fresh beef, pork and poultry products to Australia.
"We imported $[US]3 billion of Australian beef from them just last year alone. They won't take any of our beef," Mr Trump said in his 'liberation day' address.
"They don't want it because they don't want it to affect their farmers and, you know, I don't blame them — but we're doing the same thing right now, starting at midnight tonight, I would say."
$1 billion in loans for exporters promised, emergency supports
Mr Albanese said Mr Trump's decision today would have "consequences" for how Australia viewed its relationship with the US.
But he repeated he would not weaken Australia's biosecurity laws or any other laws to escape the tariffs.
He also maintained Australia would not enter a "race to the bottom" by retaliating with its own tariffs.
Instead, Mr Albanese announced emergency funding support of $50 million for affected industries, a strengthening of anti-dumping rules to safeguard products like steel, a new "economic resilience program" offering $1 billion in zero-interest loans to help develop new export opportunities and a new focus on ensuring the government prioritises Australian businesses in its procurement.
"Our government will always stand up for Australian jobs, Australian industry, Australian consumers and Australian values," he said.
Mr Albanese said "no one got a better deal" than Australia in Mr Trump's 'liberation day' tariffs, and with just 5 per cent of Australia's exports sent to the US, it would have a limited direct impact on the domestic economy.
"That doesn't mean it's a good thing," he added.
Opposition Leader Peter Dutton said Australia's special relationship with the US had not been respected by President Trump.
"I think this is a bad day for our country and it's not the treatment that Australians deserve," Mr Dutton said.
Mr Dutton claimed he could have secured a different outcome for Australia, arguing he had links to the administration from when he was in government.
But he agreed with Mr Albanese that media laws, biosecurity laws the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme were not up for negotiation.
Former US ambassador Joe Hockey, who now works as a lobbyist in Washington, said the tariffs were not a surprise, and reflected that "the United States is tired of some of the trade barriers and impediments put up" by some other countries.
"Of course Australia has been a very good trading partner and we don't impose the sort of trade barriers or tariffs other countries do. But still we have been caught in the wave and I see it as a negotiating position from the president," he said.
"He is very fond of Australia, I am sure he wants to do a deal."
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.51031
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22860277 (031001ZAPR25) Notable: Video: Trump singles out Australian beef on 'Liberation Day' - US President Donald Trump has signalled he'll target Australia beef imports as he delivered his much-anticipated "Liberation Day" announcement on sweeping tariffs. "Australia bans - and they're wonderful people, and wonderful everything — but they ban American beef," he said on Wednesday (Thursday AEDT) in a news conference at the White House in Washington DC. "Yet we imported $US3 billion of Australian beef from them just last year alone. They won't take any of our beef. They don't want it because they don't want it to affect their farmers and you know, I don't blame them but we're doing the same thing right now starting at midnight tonight, I would say." Australia will be subject to a "baseline" 10 per cent tariff on all exports to the US. Other countries, such as China, face much higher tariffs. During his announcement, Trump held up a chart showing the tariffs that will imposed on individual countries and trading blocs. Australia was also not visible from behind the lectern as Trump held up a sandwich board with each nation named. But taking the sign was US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick - where at the bottom of the chart it could be seen that the US would implement a 10 per cent reciprocal tariff on Australia.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50833
>>51028
Trump singles out Australian beef on 'Liberation Day'
Richard Wood and Nick Pearson - Apr 3, 2025
1/2
US President Donald Trump has signalled he'll target Australia beef imports as he delivered his much-anticipated "Liberation Day" announcement on sweeping tariffs.
"Australia bans — and they're wonderful people, and wonderful everything — but they ban American beef," he said on Wednesday (Thursday AEDT) in a news conference at the White House in Washington DC.
"Yet we imported $US3 billion of Australian beef from them just last year alone.
"They won't take any of our beef.
"They don't want it because they don't want it to affect their farmers and you know, I don't blame them but we're doing the same thing right now starting at midnight tonight, I would say."
Australia will be subject to a "baseline" 10 per cent tariff on all exports to the US. Other countries, such as China, face much higher tariffs.
During his announcement, Trump held up a chart showing the tariffs that will imposed on individual countries and trading blocs.
Australia was also not visible from behind the lectern as Trump held up a sandwich board with each nation named.
But taking the sign was US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick - where at the bottom of the chart it could be seen that the US would implement a 10 per cent reciprocal tariff on Australia.
Trump says his tariffs are about national security as much as economic prosperity.
He picked out medicine, tech, and ship manufacturing as being areas where the US was dependent on imports.
"We have to go to foreign countries to treat our sick," he said.
"In short, chronic trade deficits are no longer merely an economic problem, they're a national emergency that threatens our security and our very way of life. It's a very great threat to our country.
"And for these reasons, starting tomorrow, the United States will implement reciprocal tariffs on other nations."
Why doesn't Australia import American beef?
Australia has had a ban on uncooked American beef for more than 20 years.
The ban was introduced because the Australian government concluded America had not taken satisfactory steps to address the risk of mad cow disease.
Mad cow disease, or bovine spongiform encephalopathy, is a neurodegenerative disease that is fatal to both humans and cattle.
Humans can contract the disease by eating food contaminated with the brain, spinal cord or digestive tract of infected cows.
The disease is incurable and always fatal.
The most common way the disease is contracted is from eating infected tissue.
In the United States, parts of a cow that are not eaten by humans are often ground into a powder and often used as cattle feed.
This means American cows are sometimes eating the parts of other cattle that could carry mad cow disease.
That then puts those cows at risk of developing the disease, which could then be passed on to humans that eat them.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.51032
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22860296 (031019ZAPR25) Notable: Western Bulldogs forced to pay $3m to child abuse victim - The Western Bulldogs will be forced to pay a child abuse victim almost $3 million including his legal bills after the High Court rejected its appeal. A note on the High Court website has confirmed that the Footscray Football Club, its former trading name, lost its right to challenge the payout awarded to Adam Kneale. Mr Kneale had won $5.9 million after his claim was confirmed in Victoria’s Supreme Court. That figure was reduced to $2.6 million after an appeal. The Bulldogs then appealed to the High Court but that was rejected on Thursday. Mr Kneale had claimed he was abused by Bulldogs volunteer Graeme Hobbs, a now-dead convicted pedophile, who was known as “Chops” at the club. A Victorian jury found in favour of Mr Kneale in 2023 and he was awarded a record payout. The club had successfully halved Mr Kneale’s payout but had gone to the High Court to attempt to reduce it further. The court announced its decision this week, denying the club’s application for an appeal. Mr Kneale’s lawyer Michael Magazanik, a partner at Rightside Legal, said his client is relieved his legal ordeal was over. “Finally Adam can look forward to living without the legal claim hanging over his head. He is proud of having fought so hard and for so long and hopes that he has given encouragement to other survivors,” he said. Mr Kneale, who is in his 50s, was believed to be the first person to sue an AFL club over sexual abuse. His abuser was a prominent volunteer at the Bulldogs. Mr Kneale was only 11 years old when the abuse began and continued for six years between 1984 and 1990. He detailed the abuse in a 5500 word statement to police which resulted in Hobbs being convicted. A court heard Hobbs had groomed young boys for abuse by offering them free season tickets to the football and cash inducement.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Western Bulldogs forced to pay $3m to child abuse victim
Western Bulldogs had a High Court appeal rejected, forcing the AFL club to pay a child abuse victim almost $3 million.
Stephen Drill - April 3, 2025
The Western Bulldogs will be forced to pay a child abuse victim almost $3 million including his legal bills after the High Court rejected its appeal.
A note on the High Court website has confirmed that the Footscray Football Club, its former trading name, lost its right to challenge the payout awarded to Adam Kneale.
Mr Kneale had won $5.9 million after his claim was confirmed in Victoria’s Supreme Court.
That figure was reduced to $2.6 million after an appeal.
The Bulldogs then appealed to the High Court but that was rejected on Thursday.
Mr Kneale had claimed he was abused by Bulldogs volunteer Graeme Hobbs, a now-dead convicted pedophile, who was known as “Chops” at the club.
A Victorian jury found in favour of Mr Kneale in 2023 and he was awarded a record payout.
The club had successfully halved Mr Kneale’s payout but had gone to the High Court to attempt to reduce it further.
The court announced its decision this week, denying the club’s application for an appeal.
Mr Kneale’s lawyer Michael Magazanik, a partner at Rightside Legal, said his client is relieved his legal ordeal was over.
“Finally Adam can look forward to living without the legal claim hanging over his head. He is proud of having fought so hard and for so long and hopes that he has given encouragement to other survivors,” he said.
Mr Kneale, who is in his 50s, was believed to be the first person to sue an AFL club over sexual abuse.
His abuser was a prominent volunteer at the Bulldogs.
Mr Kneale was only 11 years old when the abuse began and continued for six years between 1984 and 1990.
He detailed the abuse in a 5500 word statement to police which resulted in Hobbs being convicted.
A court heard Hobbs had groomed young boys for abuse by offering them free season tickets to the football and cash inducement.
The former chairman of fundraising was an influential figure at the club.
Police found 39 Bulldogs memberships when they raided his home in 1993, which they claimed he was using to befriend young boys at the club.
Mr Kneale had waived his right to anonymity to be named in this story.
Western Bulldogs chief executive Ameet Bains has previously said he was “shocked and dismayed” about the abuse Mr Kneale had suffered while at the club.
Some of the abuse happened in the club’s grandstand at Whitten Oval while games were being played.
Comment was sought from the Western Bulldogs.
https://www.heraldsun.com.au/truecrimeaustralia/police-courts-victoria/western-bulldogs-forced-to-pay-3m-to-child-abuse-victim/news-story/4628799fe5ba6852ead5778e8944cd65
https://www.hcourt.gov.au/registry/special-leave-applications-results-2025
https://www.hcourt.gov.au/assets/registry/special-leave-results/2025/03-04-25_Results.pdf
https://qresear.ch/?q=Western+Bulldogs
https://qresear.ch/?q=Adam+Kneale
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.51033
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22860311 (031031ZAPR25) Notable: Virginia Giuffre’s agent reveals she was first hospitalised with injuries in January - Virginia Giuffre, who said in a social post that she was dying after suffering renal failure from a bus crash, was admitted to hospital with serious injuries at the beginning of the year, her agent has revealed. In the latest dramatic twist to the mystery that has recently surrounded the 41-year-old, her agent issued an extraordinary statement in the early hours of Thursday saying Ms Giuffre’s latest hospital admission was not her first this year. According to the statement, she sustained serious injuries in an incident that warranted police attendance in the southwest holiday town of Dunsborough on January 9, 2025. Inquiries by The Australian have established a volunteer ambulance crew from the beachside suburb of Two Rocks collected Ms Giuffre from a residence in Neergabby between midnight and 1am on Tuesday. She was suffering severe neck and back pain and had a cuts and bruised face. She was later transferred into the second ambulance and driven south to a Perth public hospital, arriving about 2.30am. Her public Instagram post, which she said was uploaded by accident and meant for a private Facebook account instead, showed a selfie of a badly bruised Ms Giuffre. She repeated an earlier social media claim about missing her children.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>51017
>>51026
>>51023
Virginia Giuffre’s agent reveals she was first hospitalised with injuries in January
JACQUELIN MAGNAY and PAIGE TAYLOR - 3 April 2025
Virginia Giuffre, who said in a social post that she was dying after suffering renal failure from a bus crash, was admitted to hospital with serious injuries at the beginning of the year, her agent has revealed.
In the latest dramatic twist to the mystery that has recently surrounded the 41-year-old, her agent issued an extraordinary statement in the early hours of Thursday saying Ms Giuffre’s latest hospital admission was not her first this year.
According to the statement, she sustained serious injuries in an incident that warranted police attendance in the southwest holiday town of Dunsborough on January 9, 2025.
This is separate to the bus crash on March 24 near the rural area of Neergabby, 70km north of Perth, which WA police said was a “minor” crash reported by the bus driver the next day.
Ms Giuffre had been living a relatively quiet life in Perth since she made headlines around the world as a victim of pedophile Jeffrey Epstein. She alleged Epstein trafficked her to his friend Prince Andrew, who sexually abused her in 2001 when she was 17. Andrew denies the claim but settled the matter with a multimillion-dollar payment to Ms Giuffre’s charity in 2022.
Inquiries by The Australian have established a volunteer ambulance crew from the beachside suburb of Two Rocks collected Ms Giuffre from a residence in Neergabby between midnight and 1am on Tuesday. She was suffering severe neck and back pain and had a cuts and bruised face.
She was later transferred into the second ambulance and driven south to a Perth public hospital, arriving about 2.30am.
She is not a renal patient, multiple sources said.
Her public Instagram post, which she said was uploaded by accident and meant for a private Facebook account instead, showed a selfie of a badly bruised Ms Giuffre. She repeated an earlier social media claim about missing her children.
Ms Giuffre and former husband Robert Giuffre, to whom she was married for 22 years, are separated and he has custody of their three children.
Both have faced court recently. Ms Giuffre is charged with breaching a family violence restraining order at Ocean Reef, Perth, on February 2, WA courts said. The case was first heard in Joondalup Magistrates Court in northern Perth on March 14, where she did not enter a plea, and is due in court on April 9.
On March 22, Ms Giuffre wrote: “My beautiful babies have no clue how much I love them and they’re being poisoned with lies. I miss them so very much.
“I have been through hell & back in my 41 years but this is hurting me worse than anything else. Hurt me, abuse me but don’t take my babies. My heart is shattered and every day that passes my sadness only deepens.”
Mr Giuffre, credited for rescuing his wife from the clutches of Epstein in 2002, lost his driving licence for six months after a reckless driving charge last year.
Ms Giuffre’s agent said Ms Giuffre looks forward to defending herself against her former husband.
https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/virginia-giuffres-agent-reveals-she-was-first-hospitalised-with-injuries-in-january/news-story/32db8bf72ee7e8fbc375bdea1de36118
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.51034
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22860328 (031047ZAPR25) Notable: Bus driver in crash that left Virginia Giuffre claiming she has 'four days to live' gives HIS side of the story… and paints a VERY different picture to hers - The school bus driver involved in a road crash which allegedly left Jeffrey Epstein victim Virginia Giuffre close to death has spoken for the first time about the accident. Ross Munns contradicted Ms Giuffre's account of the incident, and insisted that the car was in a minor collision with his bus. In an exclusive interview with MailOnline, he claimed the crash had been 'blown out of proportion' and accused Ms Giuffre, 41, of exaggerating the severity of what happened. Mr Munns said that the crash happened after he had followed a slow-moving white car for three kilometres before deciding to overtake when it went under 75kmh and it was safe for him to pass it, around 3pm on Monday last week. He said that the small white Toyota Highlander involved in the collision was driven by a 71-year-old woman who he believed to be Ms Giuffre's carer. He said he had no recollection of Ms Giuffre being in the Toyota, but a police report into the incident later stated that a woman aged 41 was a passenger. Mr Munns said that he had about 29 children still on board as he began his manoeuvre only for the car to suddenly start turning right in front of him to get into a rural property north of Perth, Western Australia. Mr Munns, a school bus driver for 16 years, said that he beeped his horn, but he was unable to avoid clipping the car and damaging its tail-light in what he described as 'a minor collision'. He said he immediately stopped and went to check on the car driver who had also pulled over, and was satisfied that she was not hurt. Describing Ms Giuffre's claims and the circumstances of the crash, he said: 'It's just all blown out of proportion and I know what happened. I didn't even see her in the car.' Describing his reaction when he saw the picture of Ms Giuffre's reported injuries, he added: 'I just laughed… There is no way you could get that injury if you were in that car.' But he said he was fed up about the crash and having to deal with its aftermath, saying: 'I would rather this just go away.'
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>51017
>>51026
>>51023
Bus driver in crash that left Virginia Giuffre claiming she has 'four days to live' gives HIS side of the story... and paints a VERY different picture to hers
JONICA BRAY - 3 April 2025
1/3
The school bus driver involved in a road crash which allegedly left Jeffrey Epstein victim Virginia Giuffre close to death has spoken for the first time about the accident.
Ross Munns contradicted Ms Giuffre's account of the incident, and insisted that the car was in a minor collision with his bus.
In an exclusive interview with MailOnline, he claimed the crash had been 'blown out of proportion' and accused Ms Giuffre, 41, of exaggerating the severity of what happened.
Ms Giuffre, who won a multimillion-pound payout from Prince Andrew after claiming she was trafficked to have sex with him at the age of 17, told her Instagram followers on Sunday that she only had 'four days to live' after suffering kidney failure in the crash.
'I won't bore anyone with the details but I think it important to note that when a school bus driver comes at you driving 110km as we were slowing for a turn that no matter what your car is made of it might as well be a tin can,' she wrote in the post.
On Tuesday she said via a spokesperson that the post about her injuries and selfie of her badly bruised face had been posted to her public Instagram in error and was only meant to be on her private Facebook page.
Mr Munns said that the crash happened after he had followed a slow-moving white car for three kilometres before deciding to overtake when it went under 75kmh and it was safe for him to pass it, around 3pm on Monday last week.
He said that the small white Toyota Highlander involved in the collision was driven by a 71-year-old woman who he believed to be Ms Giuffre's carer. He said he had no recollection of Ms Giuffre being in the Toyota, but a police report into the incident later stated that a woman aged 41 was a passenger.
Mr Munns said that he had about 29 children still on board as he began his manoeuvre only for the car to suddenly start turning right in front of him to get into a rural property north of Perth, Western Australia.
Mr Munns, a school bus driver for 16 years, said that he beeped his horn, but he was unable to avoid clipping the car and damaging its tail-light in what he described as 'a minor collision'.
He said he immediately stopped and went to check on the car driver who had also pulled over, and was satisfied that she was not hurt.
Mr Munns said he and the 71-year-old woman swapped details including phone numbers and were both able to drive away afterwards, but he decided to report the incident to police as he felt the circumstances were 'a little bit suss'.
He insisted that he was under no obligation to report the crash as the law only required accidents to be reported if they caused more than $2,000 damage and in his view the incident did not pass the threshold.
Mr Munns said he later telephoned the driver as a courtesy to say he had reported the accident and she rang him back the next day to say there had been a passenger in the car who had suffered 'a black eye'.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.51035
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22868870 (050245ZAPR25) Notable: ‘No exceptions’: Donald Trump tariff hawk Peter Navarro’s last-minute intervention - The 10 per cent US tariff impost on Australian goods came after a last-minute intervention from chief White House trade counsellor and tariff hawk Peter Navarro, who demanded tariffs be placed across the board without exception. Until last weekend, the tariff fate of America’s AUKUS partners - Australia and the UK – was still not decided. Australian negotiators in the US were holding the line on refusal to give way on beef and pharmaceuticals after earlier offering an enhanced deal to the White House on critical minerals access, which is crucial for defence materials. The US attitude to imposing any tariffs on Australia, which has been in negotiations since February, was “fluid”, “without malice” and not finally determined until just days before the US “Liberation Day” global tariff announcement from Donald Trump. But Mr Navarro, a long-term tariff advocate who has bizarrely described the chaos-creating tariff regime as a “tax cut”, personally intervened last weekend and insisted both Australia and the UK face a tariff. Part of the insistence was that the US President had promised across-the-board tariffs with “no exceptions” and Mr Navarro insisted on the tariffs on Australia and the UK.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50833
>>50785
>>51028
‘No exceptions’: Donald Trump tariff hawk Peter Navarro’s last-minute intervention
DENNIS SHANAHAN - April 04, 2025
The 10 per cent US tariff impost on Australian goods came after a last-minute intervention from chief White House trade counsellor and tariff hawk Peter Navarro, who demanded tariffs be placed across the board without exception.
Until last weekend, the tariff fate of America’s AUKUS partners – Australia and the UK – was still not decided.
Australian negotiators in the US were holding the line on refusal to give way on beef and pharmaceuticals after earlier offering an enhanced deal to the White House on critical minerals access, which is crucial for defence materials.
The US attitude to imposing any tariffs on Australia, which has been in negotiations since February, was “fluid”, “without malice” and not finally determined until just days before the US “Liberation Day” global tariff announcement from Donald Trump.
But Mr Navarro, a long-term tariff advocate who has bizarrely described the chaos-creating tariff regime as a “tax cut”, personally intervened last weekend and insisted both Australia and the UK face a tariff.
Part of the insistence was that the US President had promised across-the-board tariffs with “no exceptions” and Mr Navarro insisted on the tariffs on Australia and the UK.
Mr Navarro had pointed to the “simplicity” of every national facing a tariff without exception.
The President’s top trade guru – who was a registered Democrat for more than two decades until he started backing Mr Trump – has made his name as a strong supporter of tariffs and he is especially well known for his advocacy of using hard-line economic tactics to counter China.
In Mr Trump’s first term, he was the leading voice in prosecuting Mr Trump’s trade war against Beijing. He is also among several Trump aides who have served jail time in recent years. Mr Navarro was found guilty of contempt of congress for refusing to comply to their investigations into his role in the attempts to overturn Joe Biden’s victory over Mr Trump in the 2020 presidential election.
Australia and the UK, as well as close US friends such as Singapore, were given the minimum tariff of 10 per cent. The 10 per cent figure on a range of nations with different trade relations and balances with the US did not fit any logical formula.
Even the US suggestion that Australia was facing the tariff in part because of the GST did not allow for the higher rate of VAT in the UK.
The Australian understands the Albanese government is trying to negotiate an exemption from the US tariffs using the idea of a critical minerals stockpile.
On Friday (AEDT), Mr Navarro said there would be no exemptions to the US tariff regime. But it is being reported that Mr Trump – aboard Air Force One – has said the tariffs are open to negotiations.
Mr Trump reportedly said he would be prepared to negotiate for “a phenomenal deal”, appearing to contradict Mr Navarro’s statement.
https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/no-exceptions-trump-tariff-hawks-lastminute-intervention/news-story/805a47275e81e7208b7d959f72b11b2e
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.51036
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22868903 (050253ZAPR25) Notable: Lutnick calls Australian biosecurity rules ‘nonsense’, says Trump won’t back off - US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick says it is “nonsense” that Australia bans American beef imports due to disease or chemical concerns, arguing it is simply a protectionist tactic to prop up local farmers and block American sellers. He also warned that US President Donald Trump would not back down on the sweeping worldwide tariffs he announced on Thursday until other countries changed their policies and eliminated those practices the US saw as unfair trade barriers. “Our farmers are blocked from selling almost anywhere … Europe won’t let us sell beef, Australia won’t let us sell beef,” Lutnick told CNN on Friday AEDT. The interviewer interjected to say this was “because of hormonal chemicals”. Lutnick replied: “No, no, that’s not why. It’s because they just wanna protect, they want to say: ‘Oh, what, the seeds are different?’ Other people in the world are using seeds that, insects … come on, this is nonsense. This is all nonsense. What happens is they block our markets.” Despite a free-trade agreement, Australia prohibits imports of fresh US beef due to long-standing concerns over mad cow disease. The US trade office has consistently raised this as a grievance, but Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and Coalition leader Peter Dutton have both said biosecurity measures are not up for negotiation. In another interview on CNBC, Lutnick was asked why 10 per cent tariffs were applied to the United Kingdom and Australia when the US enjoyed a trade surplus with both countries. “Well, look, they each have the lowest rate available,” he responded.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50833
>>51028
>>51031
Lutnick calls Australian biosecurity rules ‘nonsense’, says Trump won’t back off
Michael Koziol - April 4, 2025
Washington: US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick says it is “nonsense” that Australia bans American beef imports due to disease or chemical concerns, arguing it is simply a protectionist tactic to prop up local farmers and block American sellers.
He also warned that US President Donald Trump would not back down on the sweeping worldwide tariffs he announced on Thursday until other countries changed their policies and eliminated those practices the US saw as unfair trade barriers.
“Our farmers are blocked from selling almost anywhere ... Europe won’t let us sell beef, Australia won’t let us sell beef,” Lutnick told CNN on Friday AEDT. The interviewer interjected to say this was “because of hormonal chemicals”.
Lutnick replied: “No, no, that’s not why. It’s because they just wanna protect, they want to say: ‘Oh, what, the seeds are different?’ Other people in the world are using seeds that, insects ... come on, this is nonsense. This is all nonsense. What happens is they block our markets.”
Despite a free-trade agreement, Australia prohibits imports of fresh US beef due to long-standing concerns over mad cow disease. The US trade office has consistently raised this as a grievance, but Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and Coalition leader Peter Dutton have both said biosecurity measures are not up for negotiation.
In another interview on CNBC, Lutnick was asked why 10 per cent tariffs were applied to the United Kingdom and Australia when the US enjoyed a trade surplus with both countries. “Well, look, they each have the lowest rate available,” he responded.
Asked the same question on Bloomberg Television, Lutnick said: “Australia, which is a wonderful partner of ours, they buy a lot of our planes. If you buy our commodity, gas, that’s really what you need, not really what we need to sell you – it’s not the same. So the president decided: why don’t we have a baseline of 10 per cent?”
And on Fox News, Lutnick said the European Union “hate our beef because our beef is beautiful and theirs is weak”.
US and global markets plunged the morning after Trump’s tariff announcement. The Dow Jones Industrial Average dropped 1679 points in its biggest wipeout since 2020, the S&P 500 sank 4.8 per cent and the Nasdaq Composite 6 per cent.
The White House dismissed the market reaction, with press secretary Karoline Leavitt saying the president was doubling down on a successful economic formula from his first term, and Wall Street investors should “trust in Trump”.
In a social media post, Trump likened the so-called “Liberation Day” tariffs to an invasive medical procedure, writing all in caps: “The operation is over! The patient lived, and is healing. The prognosis is that the patient will be far stronger, bigger, better and more resilient than ever before.”
During the announcement, Trump said he expected to field phone calls from world leaders trying to negotiate a deal on the tariffs. Albanese and Dutton both indicated they would seek to do a deal and pledged to travel to Washington as a priority if they won the election.
Lutnick, a billionaire friend of Trump from their finance days in New York, said in his series of interviews that while the president was open to deals, he wanted to see other countries act first.
“The president is not going to back off,” Lutnick told CNN. “But countries can fix their tariffs, their non-tariff trade barriers, which are much, much rougher … They are the monster that needs to be slayed.
“Then, and only then, will Donald Trump make a deal with each country – when they’ve really, really changed their ways.”
Lutnick said this did not mean a negotiation. “Negotiate is talking. No talking. Too late. These countries have abused us and exploited us, as he said yesterday. They need to change their ways, let’s see them change their ways. It’s going to be a long time, let’s see what they do. Not talking. Talking is nonsense.”
As this masthead reported, the tariffs announced by the Trump administration were not based on tariffs or other trade barriers levied by each country. They were calculated using a generic formula that divided the US trade deficit with each country by the country’s exports to the US.
Countries like Australia, with which the US has a trade surplus, received the lowest or “baseline” tariff of 10 per cent.
https://www.smh.com.au/world/north-america/lutnick-calls-australian-biosecurity-rules-nonsense-says-trump-won-t-back-off-20250404-p5lp2f.html
https://www.news.com.au/national/federal-election/anthony-albanese-unveils-plan-b-in-tariff-fight-with-donald-trump/news-story/fb01e42486689c5558611ed49ca98f2b
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.51037
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22869050 (050328ZAPR25) Notable: AUKUS in the balance as WA Minister Paul Papalia leads USA trade mission - Paul Papalia has flown to the United States on a trade mission to shore up support for the AUKUS deal amid industry concern the Trump administration’s wavering support has left it on a “knife-edge”. Speaking exclusively to The West Australian from Alabama, WA’s Minister for Defence Industries warned the security pact is at a “critical” point. Some Trump advisors have labelled the deal to send nuclear-powered submarines to Australia “crazy” while pouring doubt on the delivery timetable. “It’s a critical moment in time, there’s a lot of sensitivity around the new administration’s relationships with the international community,” Mr Papalia said. “It has to be all shoulders to the wheel to ensure that Team Australia convinces the new administration that AUKUS is a good deal, and WA is probably the most significant player in that effort.” Mr Papalia - a former navy clearance diver who served alongside American troops in Iraq - will meet with Australia’s Ambassador to the US Kevin Rudd but will not be involved in tariff discussions. “I’m not going to step on any toes, the guys in Canberra can deal with that sort of thing,” Mr Papalia said. “We’re going to add to Australia’s case, we’re not going to detract from it. But when we’re talking about the benefits we can provide to the US defence effort and our own, that’s only good for any discussions around other matters.”
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50962
>>50833
>>51028
AUKUS in the balance as WA Minister Paul Papalia leads USA trade mission
Jessica Page - 4 April 2025
Paul Papalia has flown to the United States on a trade mission to shore up support for the AUKUS deal amid industry concern the Trump administration’s wavering support has left it on a “knife-edge”.
Speaking exclusively to The West Australian from Alabama, WA’s Minister for Defence Industries warned the security pact is at a “critical” point.
Some Trump advisors have labelled the deal to send nuclear-powered submarines to Australia “crazy” while pouring doubt on the delivery timetable.
“It’s a critical moment in time, there’s a lot of sensitivity around the new administration’s relationships with the international community,” Mr Papalia said.
“It has to be all shoulders to the wheel to ensure that Team Australia convinces the new administration that AUKUS is a good deal, and WA is probably the most significant player in that effort.”
The comments come as Donald Trump unveiled his “Liberation Day” tariffs this week, which follow a 25 per cent levy that has already been slapped on steel and aluminium imports.
Mr Papalia - a former navy clearance diver who served alongside American troops in Iraq - will meet with Australia’s Ambassador to the US Kevin Rudd but will not be involved in tariff discussions.
“I’m not going to step on any toes, the guys in Canberra can deal with that sort of thing,” Mr Papalia said.
“We’re going to add to Australia’s case, we’re not going to detract from it.
“But when we’re talking about the benefits we can provide to the US defence effort and our own, that’s only good for any discussions around other matters.”
American shipyards are already up to three years behind schedule on the build-up of local Virginia-class submarines.
Production rates would need to increase from 1.7 submarines being built each year currently to 2.5, to deliver the first subs meant for Australia by 2032.
Mr Papalia arrived in the US on Monday and immediately toured Austal’s Alabama shipping yard.
“They are our flagship national shipbuilder, but here in America they’re not just building naval ships,” he said.
“They’re also building command modules for two classes of nuclear submarines and that’s a huge thing. They can be good allies in our discussions, in our advocacy with the administration.”
The week-long WA trade mission includes delegates from Curtin University and WA’s civil defence industry that is betting big on AUKUS and the potential for defence to become the State’s second biggest industry.
The delegation will also visit Washington DC, Virginia and attend the Sea Air Space expo in Maryland.
“Our local businesses can help fast-track the construction of Virginia Class submarines, that’s good for us and our AUKUS partners,” Mr Papalia said.
He’s hoping to further speed up the audit process for WA businesses, like AI developer Greenroom Robotics, to gain security clearances to work within US defence supply chains.
“We have a few systems in the US, so (the process takes) four to six months,” Greenroom Robotics director Harry Hubbert said.
“We are fortunate that our technology is highly sought after at the moment given global trends.”
Mr Hubbert said cracking the American market would boost WA jobs and the State’s international competitiveness.
“This trip also provides a crucial opportunity for face-to-face interactions with key US decision-makers, helping to break down barriers,” he said.
Mr Papalia has scheduled talks with the Democrat co-chair of the Friends of Australia Caucus in Congress but is still attempting to secure a meeting with the Republican co-chair.
“We will be meeting with the former co-chair from the Republican side, Mike Gallagher, because he’s now head of defence for Palantir worldwide,” he said.
“We’ll be talking to anyone we can with a view to enlisting their assistance.”
He is also speaking at the Submarine Industrial Base Engagement forum and meeting with the heads of General Dynamics and Hanwha, that has moved to increase its stake in Austal.
Mr Papalia said the value of AUKUS to WA jobs could not be overestimated, with forecasts estimating it could add tens of billions of dollars in value to the WA economy and generations of jobs.
https://thewest.com.au/politics/state-politics/aukus-in-the-balance-as-wa-minister-leads-usa-trade-mission-c-18241040
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.51038
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22869175 (050351ZAPR25) Notable: Chinese firm Landbridge set to be stripped of its controversial lease of the Port of Darwin - Chinese firm Landbridge is set to be stripped of its controversial long-term lease of the Port of Darwin regardless of who wins the election, with the two main major parties pledging to take control of the facility if necessary. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese dialled into ABC Darwin radio at short notice on Friday evening in a hurried bid to pre-empt a similar announcement by Opposition Leader Peter Dutton, who was en route to Darwin to launch his first major national security announcement of the campaign. Dutton was preparing to announce that a Coalition government would move quickly to terminate the current lease agreement, including by taking the dramatic step of seizing control of the port if Landbridge cannot sell it to another company. Albanese announced that he wants to get the Port of Darwin “back into Australian hands”, declaring he wants to see the end of Landbridge Group’s 99-year lease of the port. “We’ve been working on this for some time,” Albanese said of the government’s proposal, describing the port as a “strategic asset”. Albanese said the government would move to kickstart negotiations to buy back the port, saying he would be prepared to directly intervene to enter a lease agreement if a private bidder cannot be found.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50833
>>51009
>>51012
Chinese firm Landbridge set to be stripped of its controversial lease of the Port of Darwin
Matthew Knott - April 4, 2025
1/2
Chinese firm Landbridge is set to be stripped of its controversial long-term lease of the Port of Darwin regardless of who wins the election, with the two main major parties pledging to take control of the facility if necessary.
Prime Minister Anthony Albanese dialled into ABC Darwin radio at short notice on Friday evening in a hurried bid to pre-empt a similar announcement by Opposition Leader Peter Dutton, who was en route to Darwin to launch his first major national security announcement of the campaign.
Dutton was preparing to announce that a Coalition government would move quickly to terminate the current lease agreement, including by taking the dramatic step of seizing control of the port if Landbridge cannot sell it to another company.
The Northern Territory Country Liberal government leased the port, which sits directly opposite Darwin’s Larrakeyah Defence Precinct, to Landbridge for 99 years in 2015 for $506 million.
The Australian Strategic Policy Institute has detailed extensive connections between Landbridge, the Chinese Communist Party and the People’s Liberation Army, raising concerns about the national security implications of the leasing agreement from both Coalition and Labor MPs.
Albanese announced that he wants to get the Port of Darwin “back into Australian hands”, declaring he wants to see the end of Landbridge Group’s 99-year lease of the port.
“We’ve been working on this for some time,” Albanese said of the government’s proposal, describing the port as a “strategic asset”.
Albanese said the government would move to kickstart negotiations to buy back the port, saying he would be prepared to directly intervene to enter a lease agreement if a private bidder cannot be found.
Albanese said the government had been talking with potential buyers and he was hopeful that an Australian superannuation fund may take over the lease.
Under questioning from the local ABC host about exactly what he was announcing, Albanese said he would provide more details later in the campaign.
Albanese raised expectations this week that Labor could seek to scrap the lease agreement, saying he would have more to say about the issue before the May 3 election.
Insisting he would never have “flogged it off in the first place”, Albanese said: “We opposed the sale of the port of Darwin. We opposed it at the time, we thought that was unwise.”
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.51039
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22869920 (050955ZAPR25) Notable: Video: Australian superannuation funds hit by cyber attacks, with members' money stolen - A number of Australian superannuation funds have been hit with suspected cyber attacks, with members of one fund losing $500,000 between them in retirement savings. Stressed fund members have told ABC News they cannot access their accounts, adding to the anxiety. AustralianSuper has been hit with 600 attempted cyber attacks in the past month, ABC News understands, with four members losing half a million dollars combined. AustralianSuper is the nation's biggest retirement fund, with at least 3.5 million members and billions of dollars of their superannuation invested. AustralianSuper confirmed on Friday afternoon that members had been struggling to get into their accounts, and that some accounts were showing zero funds. "We are experiencing a high volume of traffic to our call centre, member online accounts and mobile app that is causing intermittent outages," it said in a statement. "Even though you may not be able to see your account, or you are seeing a $0 balance, your account is secure. This is a temporary situation and we're working hard to resolve it as quickly as possible. We apologise for any inconvenience."
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Australian superannuation funds hit by cyber attacks, with members' money stolen
Emilia Terzon - 4 April 2025
1/2
A number of Australian superannuation funds have been hit with suspected cyber attacks, with members of one fund losing $500,000 between them in retirement savings.
Stressed fund members have told ABC News they cannot access their accounts, adding to the anxiety.
AustralianSuper has been hit with 600 attempted cyber attacks in the past month, ABC News understands, with four members losing half a million dollars combined.
AustralianSuper is the nation's biggest retirement fund, with at least 3.5 million members and billions of dollars of their superannuation invested.
Super members unable to log in to accounts
AustralianSuper confirmed on Friday afternoon that members had been struggling to get into their accounts, and that some accounts were showing zero funds.
"We are experiencing a high volume of traffic to our call centre, member online accounts and mobile app that is causing intermittent outages," it said in a statement.
"Even though you may not be able to see your account, or you are seeing a $0 balance, your account is secure.
"This is a temporary situation and we're working hard to resolve it as quickly as possible. We apologise for any inconvenience."
Dozens of people have reported to ABC News about being unable to access their superannuation accounts online or through apps, or that it is difficult or slow to gain access.
"I assume it's difficult to log in as everyone is anxiously trying to," one AustralianSuper member told ABC News.
"Hopefully, AustralianSuper have taken steps to secure all members' accounts until the threat is dealt with."
"We are extremely concerned — we cannot access our accounts online, and there is no contact by phone," another said.
"Very disconcerting to have $0 in your super account on a Friday," one member experiencing this issue said.
The industry body that represents superannuation funds, the Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia (ASFA), said in a statement that other funds had experienced attempted cyber attacks over the weekend.
"While the majority of the attempts were repelled, unfortunately a number of members were affected," ASFA said in its statement.
"Funds are contacting all affected members to let them know and are helping any whose data has been compromised."
Rest, Hostplus, Insignia and Australian Retirement were also impacted.
ABC News understands none of their members lost retirement savings, but Hostplus was still investigating. Some members of those funds are also struggling to access their accounts.
"At this stage, we believe that some of our members may have had limited personal information accessed and we are currently working through this with those impacted members," Rest said in a statement.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.51040
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22869942 (051029ZAPR25) Notable: My children were on the school bus and Virginia Giuffre’s story doesn’t add up - Parents have defended a school bus driver accused of crashing into Virginia Giuffre at 70mph, which she alleges caused life-threatening kidney failure. Ms Giuffre, a Jeffrey Epstein victim who has accused the Duke of York of sexually assaulting her as a teenager, said earlier this week she had just days to live after she was hit by a bus in Western Australia. However parents of the children involved have backed the driver’s claim that the collision was minor, with the bus travelling at a lower speed that could not have caused the bruising to Ms Giuffre’s face seen in a photo she posted on social media. Speaking to The Telegraph, they said Ms Giuffre’s statements were “lies” and that the “whole story is sick”. Emmie-Rose Wright, said her children - aged five, eight and nine - reported that the crash only caused slight damage to the rear brake light of the Toyota Highlander Ms Giuffre was travelling in. “They [the children] got off the bus and said that they had had a small crash,” she said. “There’s no damage to the bus and none of the kids are injured.” She said the 29 children on the bus had not been “distraught” over the incident, as Ms Giuffre’s family has suggested. “They weren’t worried or traumatised at all…they thought that she had stopped in front of them unnecessarily.” Ms Wright described Ross Munns, the bus driver, as an “upstanding member of the community”, saying she “wholeheartedly” believed he would not speed or leave an injured person without medical help. Ms Wright and another parent, Hayley Miller, said the bus was intact when their children alighted about 15 minutes after the crash occurred. Ms Miller said she was “disgusted” that Ms Giuffre would share a photograph of a bruised and grazed face alongside unfounded allegations against the driver they trust with their children’s lives. “The whole story is sick and I don’t know what’s true and what is not but I do know [the injuries] are not from the bus incident,” she said. “It’s lies. I don’t know what she is trying to get from all of it… but I do feel bad for her and I hope she gets help.”
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>51017
>>51026
>>51023
My children were on the school bus and Virginia Giuffre’s story doesn’t add up
Duke of York accuser claimed she had days to live after being hit by school bus travelling 70mph
Andrea Hamblin - 3 April 2025
1/2
Parents have defended a school bus driver accused of crashing into Virginia Giuffre at 70mph, which she alleges caused life-threatening kidney failure.
Ms Giuffre, a Jeffrey Epstein victim who has accused the Duke of York of sexually assaulting her as a teenager, said earlier this week she had just days to live after she was hit by a bus in Western Australia.
However parents of the children involved have backed the driver’s claim that the collision was minor, with the bus travelling at a lower speed that could not have caused the bruising to Ms Giuffre’s face seen in a photo she posted on social media.
Speaking to The Telegraph, they said Ms Giuffre’s statements were “lies” and that the “whole story is sick”.
Emmie-Rose Wright, said her children — aged five, eight and nine – reported that the crash only caused slight damage to the rear brake light of the Toyota Highlander Ms Giuffre was travelling in.
“They [the children] got off the bus and said that they had had a small crash,” she said. “There’s no damage to the bus and none of the kids are injured.”
She said the 29 children on the bus had not been “distraught” over the incident, as Ms Giuffre’s family has suggested.
“They weren’t worried or traumatised at all…they thought that she had stopped in front of them unnecessarily.”
Ms Wright described Ross Munns, the bus driver, as an “upstanding member of the community”, saying she “wholeheartedly” believed he would not speed or leave an injured person without medical help.
“If an occupant of a vehicle had been injured, there’s no way he would have left and not called the ambulance,” Ms Wright said.
On Thursday, the school bus was seen at the site of the crash, and appeared to be without any visible damage, with no debris left on the road.
Ms Wright and another parent, Hayley Miller, said the bus was intact when their children alighted about 15 minutes after the crash occurred.
Ms Miller said she was “disgusted” that Ms Giuffre would share a photograph of a bruised and grazed face alongside unfounded allegations against the driver they trust with their children’s lives.
“The whole story is sick and I don’t know what’s true and what is not but I do know [the injuries] are not from the bus incident,” she said.
“It’s lies. I don’t know what she is trying to get from all of it… but I do feel bad for her and I hope she gets help.”
Mr Munns has said he was travelling at a speed under 45mph when he was forced to brake on a rural road for a slow-moving car carrying Ms Giuffre, which was being driven by a 71-year-old “carer”.
“The driver basically pulled out in front of me. I made sure she was alright,” Mr Munns said.
At first he did not realise there was a passenger involved, but the driver phoned the next day to say someone in the car had a “black eye”.
Mr Munns was in disbelief when he saw a photograph of Ms Giuffre with bruises and grazes down one side of her face.
“There is no way you could get that injury [from the crash],” he said.
When the incident happened on March 24, Mr Munns was driving the bus along his usual route through the farming community of Neergabby.
He said police had “laughed” when they were tasked with photographing his undamaged bus for evidence after Ms Giuffre went public with the allegation.
He swapped contact details with the motorist at the time, but thought it so “minor” he did not take photographs at the scene.
“I didn’t even take a photo [of the car’s damage] because it wasn’t warranted,” he said.
“I asked if she [the driver] lived here and she said, ‘no I’m a carer’, and I told her she needs to put her indicator on when you have to turn.
“That’s all the conversation was, and she asked how the kids were and I said, ‘fine’.”
Police said there was a collision between a car and a bus, but there were “no injuries reported as a result of the crash”.
They said the car sustained 2,000 Australian dollars (£968) worth of damage.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.51041
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22869960 (051047ZAPR25) Notable: The OTHER woman at the centre of the Virginia Giuffre 'four days to live' bus crash saga breaks her silence - and vows: 'I'm not covering up for her - The woman who was driving Virginia Giuffre when her car and a bus collided has broken her silence about her role in the controversial crash, insisting it's all been a misunderstanding which will be cleared up. Cheryl Sassela, 71 - the caretaker at Giuffre's $1.3million weekend hobby farm - was behind the wheel of a white hatchback when it had what police called 'a minor collision' with a school bus on a rural road north of Perth last week. Giuffre, 41, then posted a disturbing photograph to Instagram on Sunday night showing her on a hospital bed, claiming the bus had struck the car at 110km/h, leaving her with kidney failure and only 'four days to live'. However, the bus driver involved told Daily Mail Australia on Wednesday that the crash had been 'blown out of proportion' and accused Ms Giuffre, 41, of exaggerating the severity of what happened. Ms Giuffre won a multimillion-dollar payout from Prince Andrew after claiming she was trafficked to have sex with him at the age of 17 by paedophile Jeffrey Epstein. Now farmhand Ms Sassela has spoken to Daily Mail Australia, insisting: 'I'm not covering for her. I'm not implicated in a cover up.' She said the incident - which resulted in a broken taillight of her car - had sparked a misunderstanding, and added: 'I'm sure Virginia will release a statement soon to clear it all up.' Remnants of the car's broken tail light were still visible and scattered across the grass verge at the scene of the crash. Ms Sassela helps take care of Giuffre's 40-acre weekend retreat which her family used as a country escape from their $1.9million beachside mansion in Perth, 60km away. Since Giuffre's split with her husband, she is believed to be spending most of her time at the rural bolthole while her husband remains with their children in Perth.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>51017
>>51026
>>51023
The OTHER woman at the centre of the Virginia Giuffre 'four days to live' bus crash saga breaks her silence - and vows: 'I'm not covering up for her
JONICA BRAY - 4 April 2025
1/2
The woman who was driving Virginia Giuffre when her car and a bus collided has broken her silence about her role in the controversial crash, insisting it's all been a misunderstanding which will be cleared up.
Cheryl Sassela, 71 - the caretaker at Giuffre's $1.3million weekend hobby farm - was behind the wheel of a white hatchback when it had what police called 'a minor collision' with a school bus on a rural road north of Perth last week.
Giuffre, 41, then posted a disturbing photograph to Instagram on Sunday night showing her on a hospital bed, claiming the bus had struck the car at 110km/h, leaving her with kidney failure and only 'four days to live'.
However, the bus driver involved told Daily Mail Australia on Wednesday that the crash had been 'blown out of proportion' and accused Ms Giuffre, 41, of exaggerating the severity of what happened.
Ms Giuffre won a multimillion-dollar payout from Prince Andrew after claiming she was trafficked to have sex with him at the age of 17 by paedophile Jeffrey Epstein.
Now farmhand Ms Sassela has spoken to Daily Mail Australia, insisting: 'I'm not covering for her. I'm not implicated in a cover up.'
She said the incident - which resulted in a broken taillight of her car - had sparked a misunderstanding, and added: 'I'm sure Virginia will release a statement soon to clear it all up.'
Remnants of the car's broken tail light were still visible and scattered across the grass verge at the scene of the crash.
Ms Sassela helps take care of Giuffre's 40-acre weekend retreat which her family used as a country escape from their $1.9million beachside mansion in Perth, 60km away.
Since Giuffre's split with her husband, she is believed to be spending most of her time at the rural bolthole while her husband remains with their children in Perth.
Giuffre is said to have been in the car with Ms Sassela at the time of the accident, which happened when the car turned down a road on the way to the family farm.
While Giuffre said she was on her deathbed in the wake of the crash, Ms Sassela appeared to be unscathed on Thursday, and was seen feeding horses and tending to other livestock.
Bus driver Ross Munns told Daily Mail Australia earlier this week that he has no recollection of Giuffre even being in the car, but a police report into the incident later stated that a woman aged 41 was a passenger.
'I won't bore anyone with the details but I think it important to note that when a school bus driver comes at you driving 110km as we were slowing for a turn that no matter what your car is made of it might as well be a tin can,' she wrote in Sunday's post.
On Tuesday she said via a spokesperson that the post about her injuries and selfie of her badly bruised face had been posted to her public Instagram in error and was only meant to be on her private Facebook page.
Mr Munns said that the crash happened after he had followed a slow-moving white car for three kilometres before deciding to overtake when it went under 75km/h and it was safe for him to pass it, around 3pm on Monday last week.
Mr Munns said that he had about 29 children still on board as he began his manoeuvre only for the car to suddenly start turning right in front of him to get into a rural property north of Perth, Western Australia.
Mr Munns, a school bus driver for 16 years, said that he beeped his horn, but he was unable to avoid clipping the car and damaging its tail-light in what he described as 'a minor collision'.
He said he immediately stopped and went to check on the car driver who had also pulled over, and was satisfied that she was not hurt.
Mr Munns said he and the 71-year-old woman swapped details including phone numbers and were both able to drive away afterwards, but he decided to report the incident to police as he felt the circumstances were 'a little bit suss'.
He insisted that he was under no obligation to report the crash as the law only required accidents to be reported if they caused more than $2,000 damage and in his view the incident did not pass the threshold.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.51042
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22869967 (051056ZAPR25) Notable: Australian man labelled world’s worst pedophile to die in jail - An Australian man labelled the world’s worst pedophile will die in jail after a Philippines court rejected his final avenue of appeal in which he claimed he wasn’t guilty of human trafficking because he was “satisfying his own lust”. Former Melbourne man Peter Gerard Scully orchestrated a sickening years-long international child sex abuse ring that filmed the rape and torture of human trafficking victims as young as 18 months old, selling the content on the dark web. Scully, now 62, and his Filipino girlfriend Carme Ann Alvarez were sentenced to 129 years in prison and hit with a second life sentence for their depraved offending. Their crimes sparked global outrage and prompted calls for the death penalty to be reintroduced. The skeleton of a 12-year-old girl who Scully raped, tortured and forced to dig her own grave was discovered during the joint international investigation. The Australian was also responsible for a notorious video depicting the horrific rape and torture of an 18-month-old child which he sold for tens of thousands of dollars to customers online. Scully and Alvarez launched a final appeal in the Philippines Supreme Court in November seeking to overturn their life sentences for the 2014 kidnap, rape and torture of two girls aged nine and 12. Scully and Alvarez, who have pleaded not guilty throughout the judicial process and forced their victims to relive the horrors in court, attempted to argue in their appeal that their crimes were not trafficking because “they abducted the girls to satisfy their own lust, not of others”. But the court has now rejected the argument, denying their appeals and ordering the pair serve sentences of life imprisonment.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Australian man labelled world’s worst pedophile to die in jail
An Australian man labelled the “world’s worst pedophile” will die behind bars after a Philippines court rejected his argument as to why he should be allowed to go free. Warning: graphic.
Vanessa Marsh - March 25, 2025
An Australian man labelled the world’s worst pedophile will die in jail after a Philippines court rejected his final avenue of appeal in which he claimed he wasn’t guilty of human trafficking because he was “satisfying his own lust”.
Former Melbourne man Peter Gerard Scully orchestrated a sickening years-long international child sex abuse ring that filmed the rape and torture of human trafficking victims as young as 18 months old, selling the content on the dark web.
Scully, now 62, and his Filipino girlfriend Carme Ann Alvarez were sentenced to 129 years in prison and hit with a second life sentence for their depraved offending.
Their crimes sparked global outrage and prompted calls for the death penalty to be reintroduced.
The skeleton of a 12-year-old girl who Scully raped, tortured and forced to dig her own grave was discovered during the joint international investigation.
The Australian was also responsible for a notorious video depicting the horrific rape and torture of an 18-month-old child which he sold for tens of thousands of dollars to customers online.
Scully and Alvarez launched a final appeal in the Philippines Supreme Court in November seeking to overturn their life sentences for the 2014 kidnap, rape and torture of two girls aged nine and 12.
Alvarez found the girls at a mall and offered them food, promising them more if they came with her to a house where she introduced them to Scully.
“Once inside, Scully gave them alcohol, made them undress, and took photos of them naked,” the Philippines Supreme Court documents state.
“He later chained their necks and forced them to watch a pornographic film. Both Scully and Alvarez then sexually exploited the girls while documenting their sexual acts using a laptop.”
The traumatised children managed to escape from the home four days later and immediately reported the crime to police.
Scully and Alvarez, who have pleaded not guilty throughout the judicial process and forced their victims to relive the horrors in court, attempted to argue in their appeal that their crimes were not trafficking because “they abducted the girls to satisfy their own lust, not of others”.
But the court has now rejected the argument, denying their appeals and ordering the pair serve sentences of life imprisonment.
“Trafficking occurs when individuals are recruited, transported, or transferred – regardless of consent or knowledge – under threats, coercion, deception, or abuse of power, for exploitative purposes such as prostitution, forced labour, slavery, or removal or sale of organs,” the court found.
“The crime is classified as qualified trafficking when the victims are minors, which carries a life sentence.”
https://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/national/australian-man-labelled-worlds-worst-pedophile-to-die-in-jail/news-story/f8115010a726e89f345d691c7b93fbfa
https://www.facebook.com/InterAgencyCouncilAgainstTrafficking/posts/974293691487498
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.51043
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22874151 (060911ZAPR25) Notable: Aussie tariffs funding Trump tax cuts: Morrison - Former prime minister Scott Morrison says a 10 per cent tariff on Australian exports to the United States seems primarily a tool to raise revenue, and so compromising on trade barriers that US firms complain about may be a wasted offer to avoid it. After Australia was hit with a baseline 10 per cent tariff out of Donald Trump’s “liberation day” blitz last week, the Albanese government has remained hopeful that its offer of preferential access to critical minerals may afford exporters an exemption in future. Nations such as the United Kingdom, Brazil and Ukraine were also hit with the baseline figure. In an interview with The Australian Financial Review on Sunday, Morrison said the Trump administration appeared to have three motivations with its tariff regime: raise revenue from the baseline tariffs, use higher tariff rates to push other countries to lower their own trade barriers; and overall, encourage the re-establishment of American manufacturing by making foreign-made products more expensive. While China has responded to Trump’s trade war with retaliatory tariffs, lifting expectations of a global recession, Vietnam and India have indicated a willingness to lower tariffs on US imports into their countries. “[The baseline tariff] very much has the look and feel of a foreign consumption tax,” he said. “What seems to be driving that, from my observation, is more the need to raise revenue for broader tax cuts.” Trump has promised “the largest tax cuts in history” to stimulate economic growth and business investment, but with a $US1.8 trillion budget deficit, he needs to find ways to pay for them.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50833
>>51028
>>50848
Aussie tariffs funding Trump tax cuts: Morrison
Jessica Gardner - Apr 6, 2025
Former prime minister Scott Morrison says a 10 per cent tariff on Australian exports to the United States seems primarily a tool to raise revenue, and so compromising on trade barriers that US firms complain about may be a wasted offer to avoid it.
After Australia was hit with a baseline 10 per cent tariff out of Donald Trump’s “liberation day” blitz last week, the Albanese government has remained hopeful that its offer of preferential access to critical minerals may afford exporters an exemption in future. Nations such as the United Kingdom, Brazil and Ukraine were also hit with the baseline figure.
Exporters from other countries, however, now face tariffs of up to 49 per cent. Low-wage manufacturing nations in South-East Asia that supply the US with clothing, apparel, appliances and cars were hit hardest.
In an interview with The Australian Financial Review on Sunday, Morrison said the Trump administration appeared to have three motivations with its tariff regime: raise revenue from the baseline tariffs, use higher tariff rates to push other countries to lower their own trade barriers; and overall, encourage the re-establishment of American manufacturing by making foreign-made products more expensive.
While China has responded to Trump’s trade war with retaliatory tariffs, lifting expectations of a global recession, Vietnam and India have indicated a willingness to lower tariffs on US imports into their countries.
“[The baseline tariff] very much has the look and feel of a foreign consumption tax,” he said. “What seems to be driving that, from my observation, is more the need to raise revenue for broader tax cuts.”
Trump has promised “the largest tax cuts in history” to stimulate economic growth and business investment, but with a $US1.8 trillion budget deficit, he needs to find ways to pay for them.
Securing an exemption
Under the two-decade-old free trade agreement with the United States, Australia does not levy any tariffs on American imports.
There are, however, long-held irritants in the trading relationship. These include tough biosecurity regulations on meat and produce from the US, the news media bargaining code, which forces large US tech firms to pay for local news content, and the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme, under which the government drives a hard bargain against US drugmakers seeking access to the subsidised medicines program.
Morrison noted both Labor and the Coalition had made clear they were unwilling to negotiate on these issues. In any case, he was not confident a compromise would lead to the scrapping of tariffs. “You’d have to be sure that that’s what’s actually motivating [the tariffs] in the first place. And that’s not 100 per cent clear,” he said. “The revenue motivation for those baseline tariffs seems very high.”
Australia exported about $23 billion in goods to the US in 2023-24. While the direct effect of the tariff will be minimal, policymakers are wary of the broader economic effect of a global trade war including a dampening of demand for Australian commodities sold into Asia.
Some experts have warned that the greater hit on smaller Asian nations may push them towards China for economic and security support, potentially destabilising peace in the region.
Morrison, who had frosty relations with Beijing during his 2018 to 2022 prime ministership, agreed that “China will always seek to take opportunity” but said Trump’s economic policy should not be viewed as a tweaking of US support in the Indo-Pacific.
Nonetheless, he said it would be prudent for partners such as Australia to push the US to maintain its relationships in the region and keep security high on the agenda.
“It is a practical issue [for Australia] to encourage the US through our strong partnership and alliance, to be proactive in reassuring partners and allies in the region about their very strong commitment, which I believe is unaltered.”
https://www.afr.com/politics/federal/aussie-tariffs-funding-trump-tax-cuts-morrison-20250406-p5lpjw
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.51044
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22874165 (060941ZAPR25) Notable: Domestic Violence:Virginia Giuffre Alleges Husband Has Physically Abused Her For Years: 'I Can No Longer Stay Silent'- As controversy swirls about a cryptic Instagram message Jeffrey Epstein victim Virginia Giuffre recently posted about her deteriorating health following a car crash in Australia, she is now coming forward with allegations of abuse against her husband of 22 years, Robert Giuffre. Virginia, 41, previously spoke out as a victim of convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, who died in his prison cell at age 66 in 2019, and his associate Ghislaine Maxwell, 63, who is currently serving a prison sentence for child sex trafficking in connection with Epstein. Virginia says she has been hesitant to speak publicly about the alleged abuse involving her husband until now. In an exclusive statement to PEOPLE, Virginia said, "I was able to fight back against Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein who, abused and trafficked me. But I was unable to escape the domestic violence in my marriage until recently. After my husband's latest physical assault, I can no longer stay silent." She ended the statement by saying, "Again, I thank everyone for their support. I have faith that justice will prevail." Speaking exclusively with PEOPLE, Virginia's brother, Sky Roberts, and his wife Amanda, both 36, say Virginia - who lives in Australia — is making the allegations because of the severity of her injuries. "I think the last incident that they had, she almost died," Amanda says about the alleged Jan. 9 beating. "And we had to speak that truth with her on the phone. And I think she had acknowledged that if she had one more instance with him, she wasn't making it out of there." Sky and Amanda note that they don't know whether Virginia's medical issues were caused by the crash or complications from a recent beating she allegedly suffered at the hands of her husband, or a combination of the two. "Let's be clear, she never stated in the bus accident the cause of all her other injuries," says Sky. "But I do think that the bus crash in some way, shape, or form saved her life. It could have been a blessing in disguise."
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>51017
>>51026
>>51023
Virginia Giuffre Alleges Husband Has Physically Abused Her For Years: 'I Can No Longer Stay Silent'
Giuffre, a victim of accused sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, was involved in a recent car accident that her brother says 'saved her life'
KC Baker and Liz McNeil - April 5, 2025
1/2
As controversy swirls about a cryptic Instagram message Jeffrey Epstein victim Virginia Giuffre recently posted about her deteriorating health following a car crash in Australia, she is now coming forward with allegations of abuse against her husband of 22 years, Robert Giuffre.
Virginia, 41, previously spoke out as a victim of convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, who died in his prison cell at age 66 in 2019, and his associate Ghislaine Maxwell, 63, who is currently serving a prison sentence for child sex trafficking in connection with Epstein. Virginia says she has been hesitant to speak publicly about the alleged abuse involving her husband until now.
In an exclusive statement to PEOPLE, Virginia said, "I was able to fight back against Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein who, abused and trafficked me. But I was unable to escape the domestic violence in my marriage until recently. After my husband's latest physical assault, I can no longer stay silent."
She ended the statement by saying, "Again, I thank everyone for their support. I have faith that justice will prevail."
Her statement comes less than a week after Virginia said on Instagram on Sunday, March 30, that she was in the hospital and near death after the car in which she was riding on March 24 was struck by a school bus going more than 49 mph.
“I’ve gone into kidney renal failure," she wrote next to a photo of her lying in a hospital bed, her face covered in bruises. "They’ve given me four days to live, transferring me to a specialist hospital in urology.”
A spokesperson for Virginia confirms that Virginia reported a Jan. 9, 2025, assault in Dunsborough, Western Australia, to police, who did not charge Robert for any crime. PEOPLE has been unable to obtain the incident report. Robert did not respond to PEOPLE's multiple calls and texts for comment.
Speaking exclusively with PEOPLE, Virginia's brother, Sky Roberts, and his wife Amanda, both 36, say Virginia — who lives in Australia — is making the allegations because of the severity of her injuries.
"I think the last incident that they had, she almost died," Amanda says about the alleged Jan. 9 beating. "And we had to speak that truth with her on the phone. And I think she had acknowledged that if she had one more instance with him, she wasn't making it out of there."
Sky and Amanda note that they don't know whether Virginia's medical issues were caused by the crash or complications from a recent beating she allegedly suffered at the hands of her husband, or a combination of the two.
"Let's be clear, she never stated in the bus accident the cause of all her other injuries," says Sky. "But I do think that the bus crash in some way, shape, or form saved her life. It could have been a blessing in disguise."
Adding that he doesn't know specifically "what happened internally to her," Sky, an auto claims adjuster, says Virginia's bruising "is consistent [with a car crash]."
"Nobody ever said her liver issues and kidney failure were ever from that. We still don't know if it is, I'm not a medical professional. That's up to her doctor to determine," he says.
Speaking about the damage to Virginia's organs, Sky said, "I think that's from years of alleged abuse. You got to think, she's been allegedly being abused for over 10 years. Anyone's body is going to take a toll over a course of time."
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.51045
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22877911 (071023ZAPR25) Notable: New horizontal launch capability will deepen ties with NASA - A new agreement between Space Centre Australia and NASA for a “horizontal launch capability” is being framed by the company as a key step towards the opening of a major international space port in Cape York that could transform the North Queensland economy. The proposed horizontal launch capability would allow a rocket to be deployed in mid air from a C-130 Hercules military transport plane and deliver a payload weighing up to 250kg - including satellites, scientific instruments or autonomous robotic systems – into a low Earth orbit. SCA’s US-flagged company inked its first Space Act Agreement with NASA on Friday, local time, to begin testing of the horizontal capability - developed under its flagship Karman Line project – at the NASA Wallops Flight Facility in Virginia. The company’s non-executive chairman, Scott Morrison, told The Australian this capability would fill an “important gap in the market” because it would allow for shorter lead times and smaller payloads to be delivered more swiftly into space. Mr Morrison said the space agreement would deepen the relationship between NASA and SCA, bringing the company a step closer to realising its vision to transform North Queensland by opening a major international space port at Cape York. He said NASA could use the proposed vertical launch space port at Weipa to support its Artemis campaign - a series of missions aimed at returning humanity to the Moon and establishing a sustainable presence there.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50973
>>51043
New horizontal launch capability will deepen ties with NASA
JOE KELLY - 6 April 2025
1/2
A new agreement between Space Centre Australia and NASA for a “horizontal launch capability” is being framed by the company as a key step towards the opening of a major international space port in Cape York that could transform the North Queensland economy.
The proposed horizontal launch capability would allow a rocket to be deployed in mid air from a C-130 Hercules military transport plane and deliver a payload weighing up to 250kg – including satellites, scientific instruments or autonomous robotic systems – into a low Earth orbit.
SCA’s US-flagged company inked its first Space Act Agreement with NASA on Friday, local time, to begin testing of the horizontal capability – developed under its flagship Karman Line project – at the NASA Wallops Flight Facility in Virginia.
The company’s non-executive chairman, Scott Morrison, told The Australian this capability would fill an “important gap in the market” because it would allow for shorter lead times and smaller payloads to be delivered more swiftly into space.
Mr Morrison said the space agreement would deepen the relationship between NASA and SCA, bringing the company a step closer to realising its vision to transform North Queensland by opening a major international space port at Cape York.
He said NASA could use the proposed vertical launch space port at Weipa to support its Artemis campaign – a series of missions aimed at returning humanity to the Moon and establishing a sustainable presence there.
The former prime minister said the Karman Line project would also be very supportive of AUKUS Pillar Two, aimed at nurturing greater co-operation between Australia and America in hi-tech areas.
Mr Morrison, the chief architect of the AUKUS pact, said that “it was always intended that space would be part of Pillar Two – so this is a great way for Australia-originated companies to contribute”.
SCA chief executive James Palmer said this first agreement with NASA would provide for “inert testing” of the horizontal launch capability – including of its guidance and computer systems – which would take place inside the hangar at Wallops Island.
Several more agreements with NASA would then be expected to take the Karman Line project to commercialisation within a three- to four-year time frame.
“The easiest way to picture it is that it is a rocket like any other rocket,” Mr Palmer said. “That’s where the payload sits. The rocket sits on a special cradle and the rocket and cradle sit inside the cargo aircraft, in this case a C130-Hercules.
“What happens is you are at 20,000 feet, you open the back door, a parachute will deploy out, that will pull the rocket out of the aircraft. The parachute is connected to the cradle. It pulls the whole thing out. The cradle detaches from the rocket. That will then fall away. The rocket is in free fall and, very quickly, it will self-ignite and then put itself under its own control and then adjust itself and point up to space and then make its way up into orbit.”
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.51046
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22877925 (071030ZAPR25) Notable: Video: Chris Minns impersonates US President Donald Trump - New South Wales Premier Chris Minns impersonates US President Donald Trump at a New South Wales Farmers Writers' Association event in Sydney. Mr Minns was asked what executive orders he would make for regional New South Wales if he was Donald Trump for the day. - Sky News Australia
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>51015
>>51028
Chris Minns impersonates US President Donald Trump
Sky News Australia
Apr 6, 2025
New South Wales Premier Chris Minns impersonates US President Donald Trump at a New South Wales Farmers Writers' Association event in Sydney.
Mr Minns was asked what executive orders he would make for regional New South Wales if he was Donald Trump for the day.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GOaIGTOvrF4
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.51047
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22882770 (081002ZAPR25) Notable: Video: Trump takes another brutal swipe against Australia in social media tirade - Donald Trump has taken yet another swipe at Australia's refusal to accept US beef imports, as he doubles down on his contentious plan to apply widespread tariffs. Trump last week slapped a ten per cent tariff on Australian goods being exported to the US, including beef, as part of his 'Liberation Day' trade policy to apply reciprocal tariffs on nations that put up barriers to US products. On Monday, US time, Trump used his social media platform Truth Social to defend his policy against complaints from numerous countries as share markets worldwide saw a sell-off of companies whose profits will decline as a result. Trump re-shared a comment from Senator for Wyoming John Barrasso which claimed the US has not sold 'one hamburger in Australia'. Australia prevents the import of American beef when the products can't be traced from the source animal right through to the finished product. Senator Barrasso later appeared on FoxNews where he said many cattle producers in his state thought it was unfair they could not sell their goods in the US but Australia can send its beef to America. 'I appreciate what the President is doing on tariffs… Australia has sold $29billion worth of beef in the United States, and we haven't been able to sell one hamburger in Australia because of barriers,' Senator Barrasso said. 'You look at these numbers, and the ranchers of Wyoming are saying thank you Mr President, it is about time!'
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50833
>>51028
>>51031
Trump takes another brutal swipe against Australia in social media tirade
ANTOINETTE MILIENOS - 8 April 2025
Donald Trump has taken yet another swipe at Australia's refusal to accept US beef imports, as he doubles down on his contentious plan to apply widespread tariffs.
Trump last week slapped a ten per cent tariff on Australian goods being exported to the US, including beef, as part of his 'Liberation Day' trade policy to apply reciprocal tariffs on nations that put up barriers to US products.
On Monday, US time, Trump used his social media platform Truth Social to defend his policy against complaints from numerous countries as share markets worldwide saw a sell-off of companies whose profits will decline as a result.
Trump re-shared a comment from Senator for Wyoming John Barrasso which claimed the US has not sold 'one hamburger in Australia'.
Australia prevents the import of American beef when the products can't be traced from the source animal right through to the finished product.
Senator Barrasso later appeared on FoxNews where he said many cattle producers in his state thought it was unfair they could not sell their goods in the US but Australia can send its beef to America.
'I appreciate what the President is doing on tariffs... Australia has sold $29billion worth of beef in the United States, and we haven't been able to sell one hamburger in Australia because of barriers,' Senator Barrasso said.
'You look at these numbers, and the ranchers of Wyoming are saying thank you Mr President, it is about time!'
Trump previously made disparaging comments about the misalignment between the two countries' policy on beef imports.
'Australia bans - and they're wonderful people, and they have wonderful everything - but they ban American beef,' he said while announcing the tariff regime last week.
'Yet we imported (US)$3billion of Australian beef from them just last year alone.
'They won't take any of our beef. They don't want it because they don't want it to affect their farmers and, you know, I don't blame them.
'But we're doing the same thing right now, starting at midnight tonight.'
Trump's speech sparked concerns the US would ban Australian beef entirely, but instead a ten per cent tariff was applied to the meat, as it was to all Australian goods.
Australia does not sell anywhere near the $29billion of beef to the US as Senator Barrasso suggested during his appearance on FoxNews.
According to the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade, Australia sells about $2billion - which is much closer to Trump's estimate in his 'Liberation Day' address.
The Department of Agriculture added Australia does not have an outright ban on beef from the US but it does prevent the import of beef that cannot be traced from source animal right through to finished product.
The US can not comply with this measure as some of its export product is brought in from neighbouring countries. Effectively this biosecurity measure works as a ban, as Australia has not accepted any US beef imports for 20 years.
While the news of the tariff was disappointing, industry figures said American consumers would be harder hit than Australian beef farmers.
Grass-fed beef made up 96 per cent of Australia's beef exports to the US in 2024.
The US needs Australia's lean, grass-fed beef to make hamburgers, because drought in America has resulted in the culling of herds and a shortage of product.
Some fast food companies in America use Aussie beef to supplement fattier US beef to help lower the fat content in their burgers.
The demand is not going to stop and imports will continue but it is American consumers who will face higher prices as a result of the tariffs until such time the US industry can rebuild capacity to be self-reliant.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-14581231/Donald-Trump-hamburger-beef-Australia.html
https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/114297149364879462
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.51048
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22882785 (081018ZAPR25) Notable: Chalmers calls emergency economy meeting to deal with Trump tariff dump - The nation’s top economic officials have been summoned to an emergency meeting to respond to the financial chaos unleashed by Donald Trump’s tariffs, as the United States and China escalate their threats of a vicious trade war that would inflict collateral damage to the Australian economy. Trade Minister Don Farrell will also speak with the European Union’s top trade official on Wednesday in a bid to revive stalled negotiations on a European free trade pact, part of a broader push to open up new markets for Australian exporters. Opposition Leader Peter Dutton ratcheted up his economic rhetoric by claiming the economy was heading into a recession under the Albanese government, prompting Treasurer Jim Chalmers to accuse him of “reckless” alarmism before the May 3 election. Chalmers will on Wednesday lead a snap meeting of the council of financial regulators, a high-powered body that includes Reserve Bank Governor Michele Bullock and Treasury Secretary Steven Kennedy, to discuss how local and global markets are being affected by the volatility caused by Trump’s “Liberation Day” tariffs. Australian Securities and Investment Commission Chair Joe Longo, Australian Prudential Regulation Authority Chair John Lonsdale and Australian Competition and Consumer Commission Chair Gina Cass-Gottlieb will also attend the meeting. “These escalating trade tensions are casting a dark shadow over the global economy but Australia’s robust economy and budget puts us in good stead,” Chalmers said, as Australian consumer confidence slumped in the wake of Trump’s tariffs. “We’re working closely with the regulators and financial institutions to ensure that everything possible is being done to safeguard Australians from this global volatility.”
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50833
>>51028
>>50868
Chalmers calls emergency economy meeting to deal with Trump tariff dump
Matthew Knott - April 8, 2025
1/2
The nation’s top economic officials have been summoned to an emergency meeting to respond to the financial chaos unleashed by Donald Trump’s tariffs, as the United States and China escalate their threats of a vicious trade war that would inflict collateral damage to the Australian economy.
Trade Minister Don Farrell will also speak with the European Union’s top trade official on Wednesday in a bid to revive stalled negotiations on a European free trade pact, part of a broader push to open up new markets for Australian exporters.
Opposition Leader Peter Dutton ratcheted up his economic rhetoric by claiming the economy was heading into a recession under the Albanese government, prompting Treasurer Jim Chalmers to accuse him of “reckless” alarmism before the May 3 election.
Beijing vowed to “fight to the end” to defend its economic interests, accusing the US of “blackmail” after Trump threatened to impose a further 50 per cent tariff on Chinese imports in response to its vow to implement tit-for-tat imposts on US goods.
Chalmers will on Wednesday lead a snap meeting of the council of financial regulators, a high-powered body that includes Reserve Bank Governor Michele Bullock and Treasury Secretary Steven Kennedy, to discuss how local and global markets are being affected by the volatility caused by Trump’s “Liberation Day” tariffs.
Australian Securities and Investment Commission Chair Joe Longo, Australian Prudential Regulation Authority Chair John Lonsdale and Australian Competition and Consumer Commission Chair Gina Cass-Gottlieb will also attend the meeting.
“These escalating trade tensions are casting a dark shadow over the global economy but Australia’s robust economy and budget puts us in good stead,” Chalmers said, as Australian consumer confidence slumped in the wake of Trump’s tariffs.
“We’re working closely with the regulators and financial institutions to ensure that everything possible is being done to safeguard Australians from this global volatility.”
Asked whether Australia was heading into recession, Dutton said on Tuesday: “It is under Labor.”
Predicting that the US was likely headed into recession, dragging the global economy down with it, Dutton said that “huge tsunami waves will hit our shores in no time at all”.
“With his reckless comments on a recession, Peter Dutton has proven again today why he is the biggest risk to Australia’s economy,” Chalmers said.
Treasury modelling released this week showed the Australian economy would suffer a 0.2 percentage point hit to growth but would not suffer a recession.
Farrell said Trump’s decision to impose a 20 per cent tariff on all imports from the European Union had reignited European interest in striking a free trade deal with Australia after negotiations collapsed in 2023.
“The world has changed and we should take advantage of the new world order to have another crack at an agreement,” Farrell said in an interview ahead of his call with EU Trade Commissioner Maros Sefcovic.
“The opportunity is there and we can grab it with both hands.”
The government said at the time that negotiations fell apart because Europe had not agreed to offer enough access for Australian beef, sheep, dairy and sugar exporters.
Farrell said Australia would stand strong on its previous demands, while pushing back on European calls for Australian producers to stop using names such as feta, halloumi and prosecco.
In a separate speech on Tuesday to the Australia China Business Council, Farrell said that, if re-elected, the government would seek to strike a free trade deal with India as part of a bid to diversify Australia’s trade ties.
“As we face global uncertainties spurred by protectionist measures, including US tariffs, we are redoubling our efforts to strengthen relationships, diversify and find new opportunities,” he said.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.51049
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22882807 (081026ZAPR25) Notable: Video: Peter Dutton claims Australia is headed for a recession amid Trump's tariff turmoil - Peter Dutton has used Donald Trump's stock market bloodbath to claim Australia will sink into a recession if Labor stays in government this federal election. The opposition leader warned Australians that a recession is "coming for our economy" while comparing his cost-of-living measures against those offered by Prime Minister Anthony Albanese during a press conference in Sydney. Dutton warned Treasurer Jim Chalmers' comments highlighting that financial markets are pricing in a chance of a 50 per cent interest rate cut next month was a dire sign of things to come. "We know that Australian families have lived through almost two years of household recession. That's what Labor has already delivered during the term of government," Dutton said. Dutton predicted that "further actions out of the US, or retaliatory action from China or other countries" could also trigger a recession in the US. Shadow Treasurer Angus Taylor today described the past three years as the "biggest reduction in our standard of living". And following yesterday's ASX wipe-out, which saw more than $100 billion shed before markets clawed back losses today, Taylor said ordinary Australians are right to be worried about their future. "The biggest we have ever seen… bigger than any of our peer countries," Taylor said.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50833
>>51028
>>50868
Peter Dutton claims Australia is headed for a recession amid Trump's tariff turmoil
April Glover - Apr 8, 2025
Peter Dutton has used Donald Trump's stock market bloodbath to claim Australia will sink into a recession if Labor stays in government this federal election.
The opposition leader warned Australians that a recession is "coming for our economy" while comparing his cost-of-living measures against those offered by Prime Minister Anthony Albanese during a press conference in Sydney. Dutton warned Treasurer Jim Chalmers' comments highlighting that financial markets are pricing in a chance of a 50 per cent interest rate cut next month was a dire sign of things to come.
"We know that Australian families have lived through almost two years of household recession. That's what Labor has already delivered during the term of government," Dutton said.
"The treasurer is talking about a 50-point reduction in interest rates which means obviously he sees a recession coming for our economy."
Chalmers yesterday said Australia was well placed to weather the economic storm caused by Trump after Treasury modelling showed the tariffs will deliver a "modest" 0.2 per cent hit to GDP by the end of next year, and just 0.1 per cent by 2030.
"We expect more manageable impacts on the Australian economy, but we still do expect Australian GDP to take a hit and we expect there to be an impact on prices here as well," he said yesterday.
"Markets are now expecting around four interest rate cuts in Australia this calendar year.
"There's even... more than 50 per cent expectation in the markets that the next Reserve Bank interest rate cut in May might be as big as 50 basis points."
While the modelling forecasted a hit to GDP, it did still show the economy will continue to grow.
However, Dutton claimed to reporters a recession was imminent if Labor remained in power.
"It is under Labor," he said when asked if Australia was heading into a recession.
"The government hasn't prepared our economy.
"Labor has made decisions in subsequent budgets now which make it harder for the economy to function with international headwinds."
Dutton predicted that "further actions out of the US, or retaliatory action from China or other countries" could also trigger a recession in the US.
Shadow Treasurer Angus Taylor today described the past three years as the "biggest reduction in our standard of living".
And following yesterday's ASX wipe-out, which saw more than $100 billion shed before markets clawed back losses today, Taylor said ordinary Australians are right to be worried about their future.
"The biggest we have ever seen... bigger than any of our peer countries," Taylor said.
"It means households have very little room to move and we see retirees and those approaching retirement who are seeing their next eggs being slashed as a result of what's happening."
The prime minister today was asked about the possibility of an economic downturn in Australia when probed on Trump's tariff effect in Sydney today.
"We have, as a government, continued to see the economy grow," Albanese said.
"We've continued to see now, over the last five quarters, wages grow five quarters in a row. We have, in addition to that, seen tax cuts for every taxpayer dealing with cost-of-living relief.
Albanese was also asked point-blank if a recession was on the cards.
"Look, we have turned what we inherited, which was deficits each and every year, into either surpluses or a lower deficit," he replied.
https://www.9news.com.au/national/federal-election-2025-peter-dutton-claims-australia-will-have-recession-under-labor/bfbf9609-3f15-4e5d-8248-ba8e1a997048
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g5pX6gtkx00
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.51050
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22887622 (091033ZAPR25) Notable: Video: ‘Why did Australia get whacked?’: Tariffs spark US Senate row - Tensions flared at the Senate Finance Committee hearing on Tuesday (local time) as Donald Trump’s trade representative Jamieson Greer was grilled over why Australia has been hit with tariffs despite have a trade surplus with the US. Senator Mark Warner, a Democrat, lambasted Mr Greer over the 10 per cent tariffs on a country which he said was one of America’s closest security allies. “We already have a free-trade agreement, we have a trade surplus - so getting the ‘least bad’ – why did they get whacked in the first place?” Mr Warner asked Mr Greer. He added: “They are an incredibly important national security partner. Why were they whacked with a tariff? The idea that we are going to whack friend and foe alike, and particularly friends, with this level [of tariffs] is both insulting to the Australians, undermines our national security and frankly makes us not a good partner going forward,” he said. Mr Greer said that despite the surplus, Australia bans US beef and pork, and the US should be “running up the score” in terms of trade. “We’re addressing the $1.2 trillion deficit - the largest in human history - that President Biden left us with, we should be running up the score in Australia – they ban our beef, they ban our pork, they’re getting ready to impose measures on our digital companies, it’s incredible, “” Mr Greer said.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50833
>>51028
>>50868
‘Why did Australia get whacked?’: Tariffs spark US Senate row
NOAH YIM - 9 April 2025
Tensions flared at the Senate Finance Committee hearing on Tuesday (local time) as Donald Trump’s trade representative Jamieson Greer was grilled over why Australia has been hit with tariffs despite have a trade surplus with the US.
Senator Mark Warner, a Democrat, lambasted Mr Greer over the 10 per cent tariffs on a country which he said was one of America’s closest security allies.
“We already have a free-trade agreement, we have a trade surplus – so getting the ‘least bad’ – why did they get whacked in the first place?” Mr Warner asked Mr Greer.
He added: “They are an incredibly important national security partner. Why were they whacked with a tariff?
“The idea that we are going to whack friend and foe alike, and particularly friends, with this level [of tariffs] is both insulting to the Australians, undermines our national security and frankly makes us not a good partner going forward,” he said.
Mr Greer said that despite the surplus, Australia bans US beef and pork, and the US should be “running up the score” in terms of trade.
“We’re addressing the $1.2 trillion deficit – the largest in human history – that President Biden left us with, we should be running up the score in Australia – they ban our beef, they ban our pork, they’re getting ready to impose measures on our digital companies, it’s incredible, “” Mr Greer said.
But Mr Warner interrupted him, saying he was a “much smarter person than that answer” and calling the market rally today a “good day in hospice.”
The 10 per cent baseline tariffs on Australia and other countries went into effect on Saturday. At midnight on Wednesday (local time) Mr Trump’s higher import tax rates on dozens of countries and territories will take hold.
Speaking at the White House on Wednesday, Mr Trump said his tariffs have been “somewhat explosive,” but he defended the policy, saying: “The money is pouring in at a level we’ve never seen before.”
“We have a lot of countries coming in to make deals,” Mr Trump said, adding that more than 70 countries have reached out to his administration about making deals.
https://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/why-did-australia-get-whacked-tariffs-spark-us-senate-row/news-story/73d19aa539a9c734419b11db4344514b
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Aeo72qD7bfs
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.51051
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22887635 (091044ZAPR25) Notable: Video: Donald Trump threatens fresh tariffs on pharmaceuticals in major blow for Australia - Donald Trump has threatened to hit pharmaceutical goods with a fresh round of tariffs in what would be a significant blow to Australia. Pharmaceuticals were exempted from the wide-ranging so-called "reciprocal" tariffs unveiled last week, but in a speech this morning, the US president said there would soon be a new round of import taxes specifically targeting the sector. "We're going to be announcing, very shortly, a major tariff on pharmaceuticals," Trump told a National Republican Congressional Committee dinner. "And when they hear that, they will leave China, and they will leave other places because more of the product is here." Pharmaceuticals is one of Australia's largest exports to the United States, worth around $1.6 billion a year. However, American manufacturers have long opposed the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS) in part because it limits the price customers pay for listed drugs, a point Trump raised in his speech without mentioning Australia by name. "These other countries are smart, they say you can't charge more than $88 otherwise you can't sell your product and the drug companies listen to them," he said. "But we're going to do something that we have to do. We're going to put tariffs on our pharmaceuticals and once we do that, they're going to come rushing back into our country because we're the big market."
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>51011
>>51028
>>51050
Donald Trump threatens fresh tariffs on pharmaceuticals in major blow for Australia
Daniel Jeffrey - Apr 9, 2025
Donald Trump has threatened to hit pharmaceutical goods with a fresh round of tariffs in what would be a significant blow to Australia.
Pharmaceuticals were exempted from the wide-ranging so-called "reciprocal" tariffs unveiled last week, but in a speech this morning, the US president said there would soon be a new round of import taxes specifically targeting the sector.
"We're going to be announcing, very shortly, a major tariff on pharmaceuticals," Trump told a National Republican Congressional Committee dinner.
"And when they hear that, they will leave China, and they will leave other places because more of the product is here."
Pharmaceuticals is one of Australia's largest exports to the United States, worth around $1.6 billion a year.
However, American manufacturers have long opposed the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS) in part because it limits the price customers pay for listed drugs, a point Trump raised in his speech without mentioning Australia by name.
"These other countries are smart, they say you can't charge more than $88 otherwise you can't sell your product and the drug companies listen to them," he said.
"But we're going to do something that we have to do. We're going to put tariffs on our pharmaceuticals and once we do that, they're going to come rushing back into our country because we're the big market."
Leading Australian pharmaceutical manufacturer CSL saw its share price dip about 5 per cent today.
Both Anthony Albanese and Opposition Leader Peter Dutton have promised to keep the PBS out of trade negotiations with the US, and the prime minister reiterated that stance when asked about Trump's latest threat.
"Our PBS is an essential part of who we are," he said.
"We will never negotiate on it. We will never undermine it."
Meanwhile, Trump's "Liberation Day" tariffs, including a 104 per cent levy on all Chinese imports, fully came into effect earlier today, sending Asian markets tumbling, with Japan's Nikkei down about 5 per cent.
The 10 per cent baseline rate which Australia is subject to came into effect over the weekend, but the higher tax rates on dozens of countries – including 46 per cent on Vietnam, 32 per cent on Taiwan, 25 per cent on South Korea, 24 per cent on Japan and 20 per cent on the European Union – took hold this afternoon (AEST).
Treasurer Jim Chalmers paused his campaigning on the federal election trail this afternoon for an emergency meeting with Reserve Bank Governor Michele Bullock and other financial policymakers to discuss the implications of Trump's tariffs and the escalating trade war on Australia.
"It's a really good opportunity for us to confer with, compare notes with and coordinate our efforts with the regulators and others involved in the market right now," Chalmers said ahead of the summit.
"We are confident that we can weather these global conditions, but we're not complacent."
https://www.9news.com.au/finance/donald-trump-tariffs-threat-pharmaceuticals-tax-impact-australia/ad93f968-af04-4218-885e-6e8caef8b9d9
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=swotUO_1SNQ
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.51052
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22887643 (091054ZAPR25) Notable: Australia’s submarine deal under scrutiny as global alliances shift - Britain will scrutinise Australia’s nuclear submarines deal with the UK and the United States, as concerns are raised on the other side of the Atlantic about the continued reliability of the US as a security partner. The UK House of Commons Defence Committee quietly announced a parliamentary inquiry last week into the contentious AUKUS defence pact, signed in 2021, which will cost Australian taxpayers $368 billion over the next 30 years. The inquiry - the first of its kind – will evaluate whether the program remains on track and consider the impact of global geopolitical shifts since the deal was signed. The Defence Committee chairman, Labour MP Tan Dhesi, said the AUKUS program was a vital partnership for the UK and two of its long-standing allies, bringing them even closer together in their defence co-operation. Under the first of the deal’s two pillars, Australia will acquire three nuclear-powered Virginia-class submarines from the US and build five new nuclear-powered attack submarines named SSN-AUKUS. The first of those will arrive in the late 2030s, and Australia’s first domestically built sub in the early 2040s. “AUKUS has been underway for over three years now,” Dhesi said. “The inquiry will examine the progress made against each of the two pillars, and ask how any challenges could be addressed.” Dhesi said he hoped to examine any potential expansion of pillar II of the program, which includes cutting-edge technologies such as artificial intelligence, quantum capabilities, hypersonics and cyber warfare.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50962
>>51007
>>51037
Australia’s submarine deal under scrutiny as global alliances shift
Rob Harris - April 9, 2025
London: Britain will scrutinise Australia’s nuclear submarines deal with the UK and the United States, as concerns are raised on the other side of the Atlantic about the continued reliability of the US as a security partner.
The UK House of Commons Defence Committee quietly announced a parliamentary inquiry last week into the contentious AUKUS defence pact, signed in 2021, which will cost Australian taxpayers $368 billion over the next 30 years. The inquiry – the first of its kind – will evaluate whether the program remains on track and consider the impact of global geopolitical shifts since the deal was signed.
With none of the original signatories – former leaders Boris Johnson, Joe Biden and Scott Morrison – still in office, the inquiry also reflects the changing dynamics in global alliances. Notably, the US recently distanced itself from its European NATO allies, complicating the context of the pact.
At a US Senate hearing on Tuesday (Wednesday AEST), Democrat senator Mark Warner said President Donald Trump’s decision last week to impose tariffs on US allies, including on Australia and the United Kingdom, “undermines our national security and frankly makes us not a good partner”.
“We’re supposed to be doing this major deal around jointly building submarines,” Warner said after the hearing. “I think [Australia] and all of our allies are rethinking whether we can be counted on as a partner.”
In Britain, the Defence Committee chairman, Labour MP Tan Dhesi, said the AUKUS program was a vital partnership for the UK and two of its long-standing allies, bringing them even closer together in their defence co-operation.
Under the first of the deal’s two pillars, Australia will acquire three nuclear-powered Virginia-class submarines from the US and build five new nuclear-powered attack submarines named SSN-AUKUS. The first of those will arrive in the late 2030s, and Australia’s first domestically built sub in the early 2040s.
“AUKUS has been underway for over three years now,” Dhesi said. “The inquiry will examine the progress made against each of the two pillars, and ask how any challenges could be addressed.”
Dhesi said he hoped to examine any potential expansion of pillar II of the program, which includes cutting-edge technologies such as artificial intelligence, quantum capabilities, hypersonics and cyber warfare.
While AUKUS aims to strengthen defence ties in the Indo-Pacific, former Australian prime minister Malcolm Turnbull has voiced concerns, questioning whether Australia would ever receive a US nuclear-powered submarine. The US faces challenges in its own naval capabilities, with senior Pentagon officials also questioning the feasibility of the submarine deal, given current shipbuilding limitations.
Alessio Patalano, a professor of war and strategy in East Asia at the Department of War Studies at King’s College London, said AUKUS could survive the Trump administration.
“In fact, it could thrive despite the current disruptions,” he said.
He said the economic benefits of the pact needed to be clearly stated with data and examples, and said AUKUS advocates also needed to ensure the strategic value in deterrence, from the North Atlantic to the Indo-Pacific, was more deeply articulated.
“The core challenges lie in the ability to pursue today’s investments in workforce levels, such as to deliver pillar I by the early 2040s,” he said, adding that it would be crucial for the SSN-AUKUS subs to be completed on time.
London-based foreign policy analyst Sophia Gaston, a senior fellow at the Australia Strategic Policy Institute, said the secret origins of AUKUS had “proven an impediment to building a wider scope of engagement around the pact”.
“This inquiry will bring new voices and energy into the conversation ... but also confront the rapidly shifting geopolitical landscape in which AUKUS is seeking to make its mark,” she said.
Sir Stephen Lovegrove, who led a soon-to-be-released review of the UK’s progress on AUKUS – identifying barriers to success and setting out recommendations on how to unlock further areas of opportunity – said the strategic relevance of the pact had only increased since it was struck.
Lovegrove, who was appointed as British Prime Minister Keir Starmer’s special representative on AUKUS this week, said the partnership would develop and deliver cutting-edge capabilities and provide sustained employment for thousands of people across the UK, US and Australia.
https://www.smh.com.au/world/europe/australia-s-submarine-deal-under-scrutiny-as-global-alliances-shift-20250409-p5lqcq.html
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.51053
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22887655 (091102ZAPR25) Notable: Virginia Giuffre released from hospital, family violence court matter adjourned - Virginia Giuffre has been released from hospital and granted an adjournment in a family violence court case in Perth. The Prince Andrew accuser was not required to attend the Joondalup Magistrates Court on Wednesday morning, eight days since she made headlines around the world by announcing on Instagram that she was dying of kidney failure. Ms Giuffre later said through her spokesperson that she had made the Instagram post by mistake and it was meant for a private Facebook page. The 41-year-old mother of three is estranged from her husband, Robert, and has been charged with one count of breaching a family violence restraining order. In her home state of Western Australia, the charge carries a maximum penalty of two years in jail. However, some breaches - such as sending a text – can be deemed minor and dealt with by way of a small fine. In court on Wednesday, Ms Giuffre’s lawyer, Karrie Louden, asked magistrate Andrew Maughan for an adjournment until June 11. Mr Maughan granted the adjournment but told Ms Louden “a plea will be required at the next appearance”. Outside court, Ms Louden said she was not able to comment on Ms Giuffre’s case. She said she expected Ms Giuffre would provide an update about her health soon. She confirmed that Ms Giuffre had been discharged from hospital. The Australian understands Ms Giuffre left Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital late on Monday after almost a week as an inpatient. She had been taken to the hospital by ambulance in the early hours of April 1.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>51017
>>51044
>>51023
Virginia Giuffre released from hospital, family violence court matter adjourned
PAIGE TAYLOR - 9 April 2025
Virginia Giuffre has been released from hospital and granted an adjournment in a family violence court case in Perth.
The Prince Andrew accuser was not required to attend the Joondalup Magistrates Court on Wednesday morning, eight days since she made headlines around the world by announcing on Instagram that she was dying of kidney failure.
Ms Giuffre later said through her spokesperson that she had made the Instagram post by mistake and it was meant for a private Facebook page.
The 41-year-old mother of three is estranged from her husband, Robert, and has been charged with one count of breaching a family violence restraining order. In her home state of Western Australia, the charge carries a maximum penalty of two years in jail. However, some breaches – such as sending a text – can be deemed minor and dealt with by way of a small fine.
In court on Wednesday, Ms Giuffre’s lawyer, Karrie Louden, asked magistrate Andrew Maughan for an adjournment until June 11.
Mr Maughan granted the adjournment but told Ms Louden “a plea will be required at the next appearance”.
Outside court, Ms Louden said she was not able to comment on Ms Giuffre’s case. She said she expected Ms Giuffre would provide an update about her health soon.
She confirmed that Ms Giuffre had been discharged from hospital.
The Australian understands Ms Giuffre left Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital late on Monday after almost a week as an inpatient. She had been taken to the hospital by ambulance in the early hours of April 1.
Ms Giuffre’s Instagram post shortly before her arrival at Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital created confusion because she mentioned she was in a car that had been hit by a bus, had kidney failure and four days to live. It soon emerged the bus crash was very minor and had occurred the week prior, on March 24. No ambulance was called. West Australian police said the car in which Ms Giuffre was a passenger had about $2000 worth of damage as a result of the collision with the bus.
Ms Giuffre was not a renal patient at Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, The Australian has been told. It is understood the volunteer ambulance crew that collected her from the rural area of Neergabby between midnight and 1am on March 24 believed they were there for a patient with neck and back pain.
Ms Giuffre had been living relatively quietly in a beachside suburb in Perth’s north in recent years.
As a teenager she had been trafficked by the notorious Jeffrey Epstein, who died in prison awaiting trial.
Ms Giuffre alleged Epstein trafficked her to his friend, Prince Andrew, who sexually assaulted her in 2001 when she was 17. The Duke of York denied the allegations and, without admitting any of her claims, he settled with Ms Giuffre in 2022. This formally ended the civil case she had brought against him.
https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/virginia-giuffre-released-from-hospital-family-violence-court-matter-adjourned/news-story/b817e2405c1d790bfe7e68f3b26423f0
https://www.instagram.com/virginiarobertsrising11/p/DH0vvDKzDvu/
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.51054
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22892329 (101022ZAPR25) Notable: China wants to work with Australia to 'respond to the changes of the world' as Trump slaps Beijing with 125 per cent tariffs - China has offered to "join hands" with Australia in the face of the escalating tariff war that has seen the United States hit Beijing with 125 per cent tariffs overnight. President Donald Trump stunningly put a 90-day pause on "reciprocal" tariffs against dozens of nations, dropping the high levy for most countries to just 10 per cent. But China was not spared as the tit-for-tat tariff war between Beijing and Washington heats up day by day, with 125 per cent tariffs on Chinese goods effective immediately. Chinese Ambassador to Australia Xiao Qian said Beijing and Canberra must maintain their "open and cooperative" trade relationship amid the unpredictability of the US. “Under the circumstances, China stands ready to join hands with Australia and the international community to jointly respond to the changes of the world," Mr Xiao said. “In the meantime, China is also committed to working with Australia to implement the strategic consensus reached by the leaders of our two countries.” In an opinion piece to the Sydney Morning Herald Mr Xiao also hit out at the US, saying "there is no winner in a trade or tariff war and protectionism leads nowhere". "Against the backdrop of globalisation, countries around the world are closely intertwined by interests. Any unilateral measures would lead to far-reaching global repercussions and no country can stand to gain by harming others," he wrote.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50971
>>50978
>>51028
China wants to work with Australia to 'respond to the changes of the world' as Trump slaps Beijing with 125 per cent tariffs
China has made an offer to Australia in a bid to boost trade and growth between the two nations as the tit-for-tat tariff war continues with Donald Trump hitting Beijing with 125 per cent levies.
David Wu - April 10, 2025
China has offered to "join hands" with Australia in the face of the escalating tariff war that has seen the United States hit Beijing with 125 per cent tariffs overnight.
President Donald Trump stunningly put a 90-day pause on "reciprocal" tariffs against dozens of nations, dropping the high levy for most countries to just 10 per cent.
But China was not spared as the tit-for-tat tariff war between Beijing and Washington heats up day by day, with 125 per cent tariffs on Chinese goods effective immediately.
Earlier this week trillions of dollars had been wiped off stock markets across the world following the "liberation day" announcement, but surged back up on Thursday.
With the relationship between President Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping becoming unstable, Beijing is looking to other global partners to bolster relations.
Chinese Ambassador to Australia Xiao Qian said Beijing and Canberra must maintain their "open and cooperative" trade relationship amid the unpredictability of the US.
“Under the circumstances, China stands ready to join hands with Australia and the international community to jointly respond to the changes of the world," Mr Xiao said.
“In the meantime, China is also committed to working with Australia to implement the strategic consensus reached by the leaders of our two countries.”
In an opinion piece to the Sydney Morning Herald Mr Xiao also hit out at the US, saying "there is no winner in a trade or tariff war and protectionism leads nowhere".
"Against the backdrop of globalisation, countries around the world are closely intertwined by interests. Any unilateral measures would lead to far-reaching global repercussions and no country can stand to gain by harming others," he wrote.
"The US claims it has suffered losses in international trade and is using so-called “reciprocity” to justify raising tariffs on all its trading partners. This approach disregards the balance of interests achieved through years of multilateral trade negotiations and ignores the fact the US has long reaped substantial benefits from international trade."
Australia's two-way trade with China totalled $325 billion in 2023-24.
Australia and China's relationship has improved significantly under Prime Minister Anthony Albanese after it soured during the former Coalition government when then PM Scott Morrison called for an investigation into the origin of Covid-19 in 2020.
In response, Beijing slapped Australian exports with tariffs such as coal, beef, barley, timber, wine and lobsters. All the levies have been lifted in the past three years.
Mr Albanese is yet to respond, but will likely be questioned about China's offer while on the Federal Election campaign in Cairns, Queensland, on Thursday.
https://www.skynews.com.au/australia-news/china-wants-to-work-with-australia-to-respond-to-the-changes-of-the-world-as-trump-slaps-beijing-with-125-per-cent-tariffs/news-story/ba780e368e7c444eb0ea858ad6b07d47
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.51055
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22892340 (101034ZAPR25) Notable: OPINION: There is no winner in a tariff war and protectionism benefits no one - "Recently, the United States, disregarding widespread opposition of the international community, blatantly announced the imposition of the so-called “reciprocal tariffs” on all trading partners, including China and Australia, which severely undermines the legitimate rights and interests of all parties. As a responsible major country, China does not engage in trade barriers, protectionism or unilateralism. Instead, we are long committed to achieving win-win co-operation, seeking greater common grounds with other countries, and injecting stability and positivity into the global economy through high-quality development and high-level opening-up. As an open economy, Australia has also greatly benefited from globalisation and free trade. Under the new circumstances, China stands ready to join hands with Australia and the international community to jointly respond to the changes of the world, resolutely uphold international equity and justice, defend the multilateral trading system, ensure the stability of global industrial and supply chains, and maintain an open and co-operative international environment. In the meantime, China is also committed to working with Australia to implement the strategic consensus reached by the leaders of our two countries, seize opportunities of co-operation, expand mutually beneficial collaboration and promote greater development of China-Australia relations to deliver more benefits and fruits to both countries and peoples." - Xiao Qian is China’s ambassador to Australia - smh.com.au
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>51028
>>51054
OPINION: There is no winner in a tariff war and protectionism benefits no one
Xiao Qian, Ambassador of the People's Republic of China to Australia - April 10, 2025
1/2
Recently, the United States, disregarding widespread opposition of the international community, blatantly announced the imposition of the so-called “reciprocal tariffs” on all trading partners, including China and Australia, which severely undermines the legitimate rights and interests of all parties.
The tariff list released by the US government goes so far as to impose a 10 per cent “reciprocal tariff” on remote sub-Antarctic territories such as Australia’s Heard Island and McDonald Islands. Ironically, not even penguins are safe from the US’s trade tariffs.
A vast majority of countries have expressed strong dissatisfaction and clear opposition to the US’s unilateralism and hegemony. Beyond doubt, China has firmly taken countermeasures to protect its legitimate rights and interests and will resolutely continue to do that.
China released the Chinese Government’s Position on Opposing US Abuse of Tariffs and decided to impose additional tariffs on all products imported from the US.
First and foremost, there is no winner in a trade or tariff war and protectionism leads nowhere.
Against the backdrop of globalisation, countries around the world are closely intertwined by interests. Any unilateral measures would lead to far-reaching global repercussions and no country can stand to gain by harming others.
The US claims that it has suffered losses in international trade and is using so-called “reciprocity” to justify raising tariffs on all its trading partners. This approach disregards the balance of interests achieved through years of multilateral trade negotiations and ignores the fact that the US has long reaped substantial benefits from international trade.
In essence, this is a move to overweight its own interests from multilateral rules, undermine free trade and fair competition, and gravely disrupt the international economic and trade landscape, as well as global industrial supply chains.
History and facts have once and again proven that protectionism benefits no one and leads to tensions in the international situation and damage to global interests. A tariff war will not solve the US’s domestic problems, nor will it “make America great again”.
Eventually, it will boomerang back, hurting the US economy and its own interests. Since February, the US stock markets have plummeted and economic stagflation has emerged.
Former US Treasury secretary Lawrence Summers has even warned that the US faces a nearly 50 per cent probability of slipping into recession.
China urges the US to immediately stop its unilateral tariff measures and resolve the differences with all trading partners through equal-footed consultation.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.51056
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22892346 (101042ZAPR25) Notable: Richard Marles says Australia will not 'join hands' with China to resist Donald Trump's tariffs - Australia will not work with China to resist Donald Trump's tariffs, even as his latest escalation threatens to damage both countries. Deputy Prime Minister Richard Marles has rejected an invitation from ambassador Xiao Qian to "join hands" with Beijing in "solidarity" after the US president threatened its rival with 125 per cent tariffs. "The only way to stop the hegemonic and bullying behaviour of the US in harvesting the whole world is to strengthen solidarity and collaboration, and to jointly resist," the ambassador wrote in an op-ed for Nine newspapers. "Under the new circumstances, China stands ready to join hands with Australia and the international community to jointly respond to the changes of the world." Mr Marles said Australia would pursue its own interests and focus on diversifying its trade, pursuing greater ties with Indonesia, India, the UK and the United Arab Emirates. "I don't think we'll be holding China's hand," he said. "We obviously don't want to see a trade war between China and the US … [but] it's about pursuing Australia's national interests, not about making common calls with China."
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>51028
>>51054
>>51055
Richard Marles says Australia will not 'join hands' with China to resist Donald Trump's tariffs
Tom Crowley and Stephen Dziedzic - 10 April 2025
1/2
Australia will not work with China to resist Donald Trump's tariffs, even as his latest escalation threatens to damage both countries.
Deputy Prime Minister Richard Marles has rejected an invitation from ambassador Xiao Qian to "join hands" with Beijing in "solidarity" after the US president threatened its rival with 125 per cent tariffs.
"The only way to stop the hegemonic and bullying behaviour of the US in harvesting the whole world is to strengthen solidarity and collaboration, and to jointly resist," the ambassador wrote in an op-ed for Nine newspapers.
"Under the new circumstances, China stands ready to join hands with Australia and the international community to jointly respond to the changes of the world."
Mr Marles said Australia would pursue its own interests and focus on diversifying its trade, pursuing greater ties with Indonesia, India, the UK and the United Arab Emirates.
"I don't think we'll be holding China's hand," he said.
"We obviously don't want to see a trade war between China and the US … [but] it's about pursuing Australia's national interests, not about making common calls with China."
Prime Minister Anthony Albanese brushed off the suggestion of "joining hands", saying Australia would "speak for ourselves", but struck a more accommodating tone.
"Our trade relationship with China is an important one. Trade represents one in four of Australian jobs and China is by a long distance our major trading partner," he told reporters.
"These trade issues affect 20 per cent of the global market. 80 per cent of trade does not involve the United States. There are opportunities for Australia and we intend to seize them."
Mr Trump's latest reversal, which reverted all countries except China to a 10 per cent tariff, amplifies the economic threat to Australia because of its reliance on China.
Treasury and RBA modelling suggest the "China channel" is the main way the Trump tariffs will affect Australia, with a hit to our exports likely unless China does enough to stimulate its own economy and prop up its demand.
Beijing responded to the first round of tariffs last week with retaliatory tariffs, and Mr Xiao hinted a further response was likely.
"China has firmly taken countermeasures to protect its legitimate rights and interests and will resolutely continue to do that," he said.
"There is no winner in a trade or tariff war and protectionism leads nowhere."
Mr Marles said more diverse trade, with less reliance on China, would strengthen Australia's "economic resilience".
"That's really been the lesson not just in the last couple of weeks, but really over the last five or 10 years, about the importance of making sure that we have got strong, diversified trade around the world, and that's our focus," he said.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.51057
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22892430 (101121ZAPR25) Notable: Musk to review US submarines as Australia warned tariffs could push up cost - Australia has been warned Donald Trump’s tariffs could push up the cost of submarines due to be acquired under the AUKUS defence pact, as Trump tasks Elon Musk’s team with improving the US capacity to build the boats. Advocates of the agreement also say the second pillar of the pact, under which Australia, the US and the UK share military data and technology, lacks focus, should be narrowed to more manageable initiatives, and that politicians need to do more to champion AUKUS to sceptical voters. Virginia senator Tim Kaine, the senior Democrat on the Senate Armed Services Subcommittee on Seapower, said 35 per cent of the steel and aluminium that went into ships and submarines came from partners such as Canada and the UK, which have both been hit with US tariffs. “We are already having trouble getting these ships and subs on time [and] on budget. Increase those prices - it’s going to be a problem,” Kaine told an AUKUS dinner in Washington on Wednesday night hosted by former Australian defence minister turned lobbyist Christopher Pyne. Meanwhile, Trump signed an executive order aimed at pumping up America’s commercial and military shipbuilding industry, fulfilling a pledge he made during a major speech about six weeks ago. Elon Musk, the world’s richest man and leader of the White House’s Department of Government Efficiency, was ordered to review the vessel procurement process and deliver a proposal to Trump “to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of these processes”. The order did not reference AUKUS or Australia but directed offices to pursue “all available incentives to help shipbuilders domiciled in allied nations partner to undertake capital investment in the US to help strengthen the shipbuilding capacity of the US”.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50962
>>50815
>>51028
Musk to review US submarines as Australia warned tariffs could push up cost
Michael Koziol - April 10, 2025
1/2
Washington: Australia has been warned Donald Trump’s tariffs could push up the cost of submarines due to be acquired under the AUKUS defence pact, as Trump tasks Elon Musk’s team with improving the US capacity to build the boats.
Advocates of the agreement also say the second pillar of the pact, under which Australia, the US and the UK share military data and technology, lacks focus, should be narrowed to more manageable initiatives, and that politicians need to do more to champion AUKUS to sceptical voters.
Virginia senator Tim Kaine, the senior Democrat on the Senate Armed Services Subcommittee on Seapower, said 35 per cent of the steel and aluminium that went into ships and submarines came from partners such as Canada and the UK, which have both been hit with US tariffs.
“We are already having trouble getting these ships and subs on time [and] on budget. Increase those prices – it’s going to be a problem,” Kaine told an AUKUS dinner in Washington on Wednesday night hosted by former Australian defence minister turned lobbyist Christopher Pyne.
The United States produces Virginia-class nuclear-powered submarines at a rate of 1.1 a year and needs to increase production to 2.3 a year to fulfil its obligations to sell Australia the boats in the 2030s. The president of the day can veto the sale if those targets are not being met.
The AUKUS pact will cost Australian taxpayers $368 billion over the next 30 years. Under the deal, Australia will acquire three Virginia-class submarines from the US and build five new nuclear-powered attack submarines.
Kaine said Trump’s tariffs undermined AUKUS because of the large number of products that must be traded to properly integrate the three nations’ defence industries.
“[Tariffs] slow us down and make things harder,” he said, adding they also sent a bad message to allies. “Allies are friends, and when you treat friends badly in trade, it just puts a cloud over the entire relationship.”
Kaine, who described himself as the biggest fan of AUKUS in the US Senate, warned that the second pillar of the program was potentially unwieldy.
“The sky’s the limit, and there are unlimited things we could do together – what it needs is some definition and some choices,” Kaine said. Instead of saying “we can do everything”, he said, “let’s pick two or three things and just say we’ll go after those two or three things and do them well”.
Former British defence secretary Michael Fallon agreed the second prong of AUKUS would benefit from “perhaps cutting back on some of the range of activities and concentrating on those technologies that really will keep us ahead of our adversaries”.
The comments reflect widely shared frustrations about bureaucracy and regulations slowing down the pact at a time of increasing geostrategic competition with China.
In particular, the US has only agreed to share about 70 per cent of the relevant military data and technology. Australia’s US ambassador, Kevin Rudd, told a defence conference this week: “We’ll still chip away at the remaining 30 per cent; we’re a persistent bunch of bastards in Australia.”
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.51058
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22900942 (120527ZAPR25) Notable: Anthony Albanese and Peter Dutton won’t follow Donald Trump’s tough trade talk on China - Anthony Albanese and Peter Dutton are promising big business they will rebuff any push by Donald Trump for nations to take a tougher economic approach to Beijing, as the latest salvo in the White House’s trade war was expected to halve China’s GDP and push it into dumping goods that cannot be sold into America. The US President on Thursday (AEST) announced a 90-day pause on his sweeping tariffs, giving at least 75 countries a 10 per cent baseline but hitting China with even higher levies after Beijing hit the US with a retaliatory levy of 84 per cent. Asked on Thursday whether Australia’s current trade regime with Beijing could hurt chances of a tariff exemption from the US, the Prime Minister said “No”. “We will speak for ourselves, and we speak for ourselves. And Australia’s position is that free and fair trade is a good thing,” the Prime Minister said. “Our trade relationship with China is an important one. We have restored in excess of $20bn of trade exports to China where there were impediments.” Former ambassador to China Geoff Raby also warned Australia would need to team up with Beijing to mitigate the impact of the tariff crisis. “The reality is we are going to have to work with China, whether we like it or not, as well as we will work with other regional countries. But other regional countries … have none of the hesitation we have over working with China.” Mr Dutton also sidestepped Beijing’s call for a united front against Washington, saying only that Australia needed to have “a strong trading relationship with China - it’s in our mutual interest.”
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50833
>>51028
>>51054
Anthony Albanese and Peter Dutton won’t follow Donald Trump’s tough trade talk on China
MATTHEW CRANSTON - April 10, 2025
1/2
Anthony Albanese and Peter Dutton are promising big business they will rebuff any push by Donald Trump for nations to take a tougher economic approach to Beijing, as the latest salvo in the White House’s trade war was expected to halve China’s GDP and push it into dumping goods that cannot be sold into America.
The US President on Thursday (AEST) announced a 90-day pause on his sweeping tariffs, giving at least 75 countries a 10 per cent baseline but hitting China with even higher levies after Beijing hit the US with a retaliatory levy of 84 per cent.
As the President tried to shake off suggestions his global round of tariffs against the US’s allies had backfired and said the nation “had to take the medicine” of his radical rewriting of international trade, Mr Trump said he was sure Chinese President Xi Jinping would do a deal with him to stop the trade war continuing.
“President Xi is one of the smartest people in the world and I don’t think he will allow (escalation) to happen,” Mr Trump said in the Oval Office.
“We are very powerful. We have weaponry … but I think President Xi is a man who knows exactly what has to be done. I think he’s going to want to do a deal. There will be a telephone call and we’ll be off to the races.”
China’s leadership was reportedly gathering late on Thursday for a meeting to discuss economic stimulus measures in response to a tariff hit that analysts have estimated could slow the country’s GDP growth rate by as much as 2.5 per cent.
But Mr Xi showed no sign of backing down, with Chinese government mouthpieces on Thursday quoting Mao Zedong as they declared China would “never yield”.
“We are Chinese. We are not afraid of provocations. We don’t back down,” Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Mao Ning said in a post on X.
That post included a link to a video of a fiery speech given by Chairman Mao after he sent the People’s Liberation Army to fight America in Korea in the 1950s.
Reserve Bank governor Michele Bullock on Thursday night moved to try and calm Australians, saying the nation was ready to absorb global shocks and it would take time to work out the consequences of the Trump-induced markets turmoil.
“It will take some time to see how all of this plays out, and the added unpredictability means we need to be patient as we work through how all of this could affect demand and supply globally,” Ms Bullock told a Chief Executive Women dinner in Melbourne.
“We are carefully considering several factors including the response of our trading partners, additional counter-responses from the US, the response of our exchange rate, and adjustments in other financial markets.”
New analysis from investment bank Barclays showed that without a bigger fiscal stimulus, China’s GDP growth would more than halve to just 2 per cent because of the tariffs and slow the growth of its trading partners.
Despite the Australian Stock Exchange soaring on Thursday with the ASX 200 index rising as much as 6.3 per cent amid Mr Trump’s wider backdown on tariffs, Australia is now facing the flow-on effects on the 125 per cent tariffs now on the nation’s biggest trading partner China.
Peak business groups on Thursday said they were concerned Mr Trump might demand that allies such as Australia impose similar tariffs on Chinese imports or go as far as placing fees on Chinese flagged ships, which the White House ordered this week.
And economists on Thursday warned any government formed after the May 3 election should steer clear of tough measures against any products China might start dumping into Australia, which could lower input costs for business and balance any hit to the economy from a fall in commodity exports.
Asked on Thursday whether Australia’s current trade regime with Beijing could hurt chances of a tariff exemption from the US, the Prime Minister said “No”.
“We will speak for ourselves, and we speak for ourselves. And Australia’s position is that free and fair trade is a good thing,” the Prime Minister said.
“Our trade relationship with China is an important one. We have restored in excess of $20bn of trade exports to China where there were impediments.”
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.51059
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22900962 (120534ZAPR25) Notable: Australia wants AUKUS submarines for deterrence, stealth, says PM Albanese - Australia is buying nuclear-powered submarines as a deterrent, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said on Friday, adding that the AUKUS treaty that has come under scrutiny amid President Donald Trump's trade policy was also in the United States' interests. The U.S. sale of three nuclear-powered submarines to Australia under AUKUS is facing new doubts as Trump's tariffs take hold, and amid concern in Washington that providing the subs to Canberra may reduce deterrence to China. Campaigning for a May 3 election in the northern garrison town of Darwin, Albanese told reporters he was "confident about AUKUS". "We're investing in our assets so that we're more secure. Obviously you have assets there as deterrents," he said. "The great benefit of nuclear-powered submarines, as I've spoken about many times, the reason why the Government supports them is because of their stealth capacity." Asked about comments by a U.S. defence strategist who told Reuters that Australia was unwilling to talk about the offensive capability of the submarines, Albanese said it was not responsible "to talk up war".
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50962
>>50833
>>51028
Australia wants AUKUS submarines for deterrence, stealth, says PM Albanese
Kirsty Needham - April 11, 2025
SYDNEY, April 11 (Reuters) - Australia is buying nuclear-powered submarines as a deterrent, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said on Friday, adding that the AUKUS treaty that has come under scrutiny amid President Donald Trump's trade policy was also in the United States' interests.
The U.S. sale of three nuclear-powered submarines to Australia under AUKUS is facing new doubts as Trump's tariffs take hold, and amid concern in Washington that providing the subs to Canberra may reduce deterrence to China.
The U.S. Navy in September set a deadline of 2027 for its forces to be prepared for a conflict with China.
Reuters reported, citing U.S. defence experts and documents, consternation that Australia's reluctance to even discuss using the attack submarines against China means transferring them out of the U.S. fleet in 2032 could hurt deterrence efforts.
Campaigning for a May 3 election in the northern garrison town of Darwin, Albanese told reporters he was "confident about AUKUS".
"We're investing in our assets so that we're more secure. Obviously you have assets there as deterrents," he said. "The great benefit of nuclear-powered submarines, as I've spoken about many times, the reason why the Government supports them is because of their stealth capacity."
Asked about comments by a U.S. defence strategist who told Reuters that Australia was unwilling to talk about the offensive capability of the submarines, Albanese said it was not responsible "to talk up war".
Australia faces a 2025 deadline to pay the United States $2 billion under AUKUS to assist with improving U.S. submarine shipyards.
"We support the existing arrangements that we have with the United States," Albanese said when asked whether he would agree to a request for more money from the Trump Administration.
Opposition Liberal Party leader Peter Dutton said Australia needed nuclear submarines because it is an island nation.
"The nuclear submarine allows us to project strength. It makes us a more reliable partner for our Five Eyes partners, and in addition to that Japan and other countries including the Philippines, India," he said on Friday, referring to the intelligence sharing agreement between Australia, the U.S., Canada, New Zealand and Britain.
Albanese's government had cannibalised spending from other parts of the defence budget to pay for AUKUS, he said.
"I do think it is at risk under Labor, because they are not putting money in. If the Americans think or the Brits think we are not serious about the programme, why would they proceed with it?" he told reporters in Western Australia.
Labor has said it is spending A$50 billion more over a decade on defence.
https://www.reuters.com/business/aerospace-defense/australia-wants-aukus-submarines-deterrence-stealth-says-pm-albanese-2025-04-11/
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.51060
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22900991 (120543ZAPR25) Notable: Election 2025: Peter Dutton fears for AUKUS under ALP - Peter Dutton says he holds “huge concern” about the AUKUS pact under Labor, claiming former US president Joe Biden had initially been hesitant to enter the trilateral security agreement but the Coalition, under Scott Morrison, had convinced the Democrat leader. Campaigning in Perth on Friday, where he hopes to make significant gains to regain government, the Opposition Leader brushed off concerns that Donald Trump’s government efficiency head, Elon Musk, could seek to make cuts to the defence agreement. Speaking at a business breakfast meeting at Perth’s crown casino, Mr Dutton promoted the Coalition’s track record of delivering political results, including getting the AUKUS nuclear-powered submarine deal over the line. The Opposition Leader also accused Anthony Albanese of cutting defence spending, and raised concerns about Labor’s history on defence. When pressed on his concerns about the future of the security pact under Labor, Mr Dutton accused Labor of ripping $80bn out of defence. “First of all, they always run defence spending down, it’s what Labor governments always do, and this government is no different,” he said. “This is the biggest-spending government since the Whitlam government 40 years ago. So, first point is that we have a government that has a spending problem, but it’s not on defence, so they have cannibalised the army and navy and air force to pay for the initial parts for AUKUS. So whilst they’re telling that they’re committed, they haven’t put funding into it. And I think what Australians can see is this Prime Minister speaks out of both sides of his mouth. We negotiated the deal on all this because we live in an uncertain world.”
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50962
>>50833
>>51057
Election 2025: Peter Dutton fears for AUKUS under ALP
RHIANNON DOWN - 11 April 2025
Peter Dutton says he holds “huge concern” about the AUKUS pact under Labor, claiming former US president Joe Biden had initially been hesitant to enter the trilateral security agreement but the Coalition, under Scott Morrison, had convinced the Democrat leader.
Campaigning in Perth on Friday, where he hopes to make significant gains to regain government, the Opposition Leader brushed off concerns that Donald Trump’s government efficiency head, Elon Musk, could seek to make cuts to the defence agreement.
Speaking at a business breakfast meeting at Perth’s crown casino, Mr Dutton promoted the Coalition’s track record of delivering political results, including bringgetting the AUKUS" title="Does Australia sink or swim with AUKUS?">getting the AUKUS nuclear-powered submarine deal over the line.
“That was a Liberal government negotiating with the Democratic administration,” he said. “President Biden didn’t want the deal, and ultimately we were able to land it.
“The Americans hadn’t shared their nuclear secrets since the 1950s and it was a significant outcome, and we had worked on that. I think it demonstrates my team and I are experienced to deal with whatever comes our way.”
On a campaign visit to a conveyor manufacturing facility in the outer-suburban electorate of Hasluck later on Friday, Mr Dutton clarified his remarks saying the former Democrat president had held long-term anti-proliferation views.
The Opposition Leader also accused Anthony Albanese of cutting defence spending, and raised concerns about Labor’s history on defence.
“I have huge concerns about AUKUS under Anthony Albanese, I really do,” Mr Dutton said. “In relation to president Biden, president Biden had a longstanding and consistent view in relation to non-proliferation, and he’s had that his whole career. And to his credit, he was consistent in his views in his position. So that was the hesitation.”
Mr Albanese, who was also campaigning in Western Australia on Friday having flown from Darwin, dismissed Mr Dutton’s concern about AUKUS as an “irresponsible comment”.
When pressed on his concerns about the future of the security pact under Labor, Mr Dutton accused Labor of ripping $80bn out of defence.
“First of all, they always run defence spending down, it’s what Labor governments always do, and this government is no different,” he said.
“This is the biggest-spending government since the Whitlam government 40 years ago.
“So, first point is that we have a government that has a spending problem, but it’s not on defence, so they have cannibalised the army and navy and air force to pay for the initial parts for AUKUS. So whilst they’re telling that they’re committed, they haven’t put funding into it.
“And I think what Australians can see is this Prime Minister speaks out of both sides of his mouth. We negotiated the deal on all this because we live in an uncertain world.”
Mr Dutton criticised Mr Albanese for being “weak” on defence and refused to weigh in on suggestions the Trump White House could implement cuts to the AUKUS deal.
“I want to protect our national security from the weak Prime Minister – that’s what I want to do,” Mr Dutton said.
“The Prime Minister has taken $80bn out of defence. I want to make sure that we can invest into defence, because, as the Prime Minister says, we live in the most precarious period since 1945, and then he doesn’t do anything about it.”
Mr Dutton hammered home the importance of the mining and resources sector during his breakfast address, which was followed by a visit to manufacturer PROK, which produces conveyors for mine sites.
https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/defence/election-2025-peter-dutton-fears-for-aukus-under-alp/news-story/79b9c810b0c6f9893b39101799858e12
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.51061
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22905410 (131024ZAPR25) Notable: ‘Never should have been charged’: Ghislaine Maxwell tells SCOTUS that Jeffrey Epstein deal applied to her, too - On the last day permitted by the justices, Ghislaine Maxwell filed a 159-page petition Friday asking the U.S. Supreme Court to overturn her sex-trafficking conviction, arguing that per the terms of a non-prosecution agreement the government made with her former boyfriend, Jeffrey Epstein, she should never have been prosecuted. The 63-year old Maxwell was convicted in 2021 of five counts of sex trafficking and grooming minors for Epstein’s abuse - crimes for which she was sentenced 20 years imprisonment. Epstein himself died in jail before he could face trial. Following Maxwell’s conviction, she unsuccessfully appealed, having argued that a 2007 plea deal between Epstein and the federal government made in the Southern District of Florida protected her - even though she was not a party to the deal and her prosecution was taking place in the Southern District of New York. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit ruled that it was “well established” law that a plea agreement “binds only the office of the United States Attorney for the district in which the plea is entered unless it affirmatively appears that the agreement contemplates a broader restriction,” and that no such indication was present in Maxwell’s case. In Maxwell’s petition, her attorney called the case “the perfect vehicle” to resolve a split among the circuits over whether, in disputes like Maxwell’s, “United States” refers to the federal government broadly, or prosecutors in a specific jurisdiction more narrowly. It goes on to argue that a promise made in a plea agreement by one set of federal prosecutors should be binding on prosecutors from a different jurisdiction. “A defendant should be able to rely on a promise that the United States will not prosecute again, without being subject to a gotcha in some other jurisdiction that chooses to interpret that plain language promise in some other way,” it said in the brief.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>51017
>>51023
‘Never should have been charged’: Ghislaine Maxwell tells SCOTUS that Jeffrey Epstein deal applied to her, too
ELURA NANOS - Apr 11th, 2025
On the last day permitted by the justices, Ghislaine Maxwell filed a 159-page petition Friday asking the U.S. Supreme Court to overturn her sex-trafficking conviction, arguing that per the terms of a non-prosecution agreement the government made with her former boyfriend, Jeffrey Epstein, she should never have been prosecuted.
The 63-year old Maxwell was convicted in 2021 of five counts of sex trafficking and grooming minors for Epstein’s abuse - crimes for which she was sentenced 20 years imprisonment. Epstein himself died in jail before he could face trial.
Following Maxwell’s conviction, she unsuccessfully appealed, having argued that a 2007 plea deal between Epstein and the federal government made in the Southern District of Florida protected her - even though she was not a party to the deal and her prosecution was taking place in the Southern District of New York. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit ruled that it was “well established” law that a plea agreement “binds only the office of the United States Attorney for the district in which the plea is entered unless it affirmatively appears that the agreement contemplates a broader restriction,” and that no such indication was present in Maxwell’s case.
Maxwell initially had until Feb. 23 to file an appeal with the nation’s highest court, but a few weeks before the filing was due, the deadline was extended by Justice Sonia Sotomayor until April 10, after Maxwell said she had hired a new lawyer just one day earlier.
In Maxwell’s petition, her attorney called the case “the perfect vehicle” to resolve a split among the circuits over whether, in disputes like Maxwell’s, “United States” refers to the federal government broadly, or prosecutors in a specific jurisdiction more narrowly. It goes on to argue that a promise made in a plea agreement by one set of federal prosecutors should be binding on prosecutors from a different jurisdiction.
“A defendant should be able to rely on a promise that the United States will not prosecute again, without being subject to a gotcha in some other jurisdiction that chooses to interpret that plain language promise in some other way,” it said in the brief.
Maxwell is a British former socialite who is the daughter of British media proprietor and fraudster Robert Maxwell.
Throughout Maxwell’s prosecution, information surfaced relating to connections between Maxwell, Epstein, and President Donald Trump, including testimony from one of Maxwell’s victims that Epstein introduced her to Trump at Mar-a-Lago when she was just 14 years old. The conservative-leaning Court - which includes three justices appointed by Trump - will now have the chance to decide whether Maxwell’s case is one in which they wish to become involved.
“This is an important issue and we are hopeful that the Supreme Court takes the case,” said Maxwell’s attorney, David Oscar Markus, in an email to Law&Crime Friday. “Ghislaine never should have been charged as the federal government gave her immunity. To say that it only applies in one jurisdiction and not another makes no sense as a matter of law or common sense.”
You can read the full filing here:
https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/25895382-maxwell-petition/
https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile/never-should-have-been-charged-ghislaine-maxwell-tells-scotus-that-jeffrey-epstein-deal-applied-to-her-too/
https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=/docket/docketfiles/html/public/24a709.html
https://ba2454cd-c37d-4338-88ee-63f8ce48d2ce.usrfiles.com/ugd/ba2454_e2ee721ce27a40fbbacb6d342714fb4e.pdf
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.51062
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22909343 (141031ZAPR25) Notable: Russian ambassador leaves Canberra amid uncertainty over new replacement - A potential diplomatic stand-off is emerging over Russia's next diplomatic appointment to Australia after the previous ambassador quietly departed over a week ago. The ABC can reveal Dr Alexey Pavlovsky concluded his posting to Canberra on April 5 and flew out of the country, leaving Chargé d'Affaires Ms Yulia Gromyko as the Russian embassy's most senior diplomat. Ambassador Pavlovsky began his posting to Canberra in 2019 and had been the federal government's main point of contact as it works to secure the release of Australian prisoner Oscar Jenkins, who was captured by Russia last year fighting for Ukraine. During Ambassador Pavlovsky's tenure, diplomatic relations have continued to sour, and two years ago the Albanese government moved to prevent Russia building a new embassy on land adjacent to Parliament House. A figure with knowledge of the Russian ambassador's departure claims the name of President Putin's proposed replacement has been given to the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade (DFAT) but it is yet to be approved. "Australia is wedged here," the official tells the ABC, speaking on the condition of anonymity. "They can't say no to the new ambassador choice, or it totally stuffs DFAT's already small diplomatic footprint in Moscow." DFAT has not responded to questions about when it was first told of Ambassador Pavlovsky's departure, but under caretaker conventions requests for "agrément" to confirm new Heads of Mission cannot be made during an election campaign.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>>/qresearch/22357731 (pb)
>>>/qresearch/22357749 (pb)
Russian ambassador leaves Canberra amid uncertainty over new replacement
Andrew Greene - 14 April 2025
A potential diplomatic stand-off is emerging over Russia's next diplomatic appointment to Australia after the previous ambassador quietly departed over a week ago.
The ABC can reveal Dr Alexey Pavlovsky concluded his posting to Canberra on April 5 and flew out of the country, leaving Chargé d'Affaires Ms Yulia Gromyko as the Russian embassy's most senior diplomat.
Ambassador Pavlovsky began his posting to Canberra in 2019 and had been the federal government's main point of contact as it works to secure the release of Australian prisoner Oscar Jenkins, who was captured by Russia last year fighting for Ukraine.
During Ambassador Pavlovsky's tenure, diplomatic relations have continued to sour, and two years ago the Albanese government moved to prevent Russia building a new embassy on land adjacent to Parliament House.
In early 2023, ASIO Boss Mike Burgess revealed his intelligence agency had disrupted a "hive of spies" during the previous 12 months, in an operation that was later reported to have identified several Russian citizens operating across Australia under diplomatic cover.
Security experts say that under President Vladimir Putin's rule the main function for Russian embassies is to conduct espionage and hybrid warfare, while traditional diplomacy is a lower priority because the Kremlin instead relies on reports from intelligence agencies.
Last year, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese told Moscow to "back off" after the Kremlin criticised the arrest of Russian citizen and soldier Kira Korolev, 40, and her 62-year-old husband Igor Korolev, on espionage charges.
A figure with knowledge of the Russian ambassador's departure claims the name of President Putin's proposed replacement has been given to the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade (DFAT) but it is yet to be approved.
"Australia is wedged here," the official tells the ABC, speaking on the condition of anonymity.
"They can't say no to the new ambassador choice, or it totally stuffs DFAT's already small diplomatic footprint in Moscow."
DFAT has not responded to questions about when it was first told of Ambassador Pavlovsky's departure, but under caretaker conventions requests for "agrément" to confirm new Heads of Mission cannot be made during an election campaign.
Alexey Pavlovsky has been Russia's longest serving ambassador to Australia since the collapse of the Soviet Union, but an embassy spokesperson told the ABC it would not comment on his departure or replacement, saying "as per the usual practice, such matters are kept confidential".
Members of Canberra's diplomatic corps have told the ABC that since Russia's invasion of Ukraine began in 2022, Ambassador Pavlovsky has been shunned from most other embassy events and has instead dealt mainly with Russia's diaspora community.
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-04-14/russian-ambassador-alexey-pavlosky-leaves-australia/105171912
https://qresear.ch/?q=Alexey+Pavlovsky
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.51063
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22909387 (141108ZAPR25) Notable: Video: James Paterson unintimidated by ‘loser’ neo-Nazis - Opposition home affairs spokesperson James Paterson has been targeted by a neo-Nazi protest, saying he was not “remotely intimidated by cosplaying losers” who - between racist chants – denigrated both major parties for abandoning “the white man”. In social media video seen by The Australian, a group of 20 people clad head-to-toe in black with their faces obscured formed a barricade outside Senator Paterson’s office on York Street, South Melbourne, while an unmasked ringleader blared a speech into a megaphone beside a banner reading “Liberal or Labor Third World Australia”. The man, who at one stage appears to make an illegal Nazi salute, led the group in chants of “Australia for the white man” and “hail victory”. “Our people are displaced by swarms of foreigners. Every excess is allowed to fester in our city,” he said. Senator Paterson has been a vocal opponent of Nazism and anti-Semites, leading the Coalition’s policy in both regards. In a statement he said he was unperturbed in the wake of the protest. “I certainly won’t be lectured on patriotism from people who worship a failed foreign regime. These protesters only make me more determined to protect Australians from extremists of all stripes,” he said. “I’m not remotely intimidated by cosplaying losers who hide their faces behind masks.”
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>>/qresearch/22513153 (pb)
James Paterson unintimidated by ‘loser’ neo-Nazis
JAMES DOWLING - 14 April 2025
Opposition home affairs spokesperson James Paterson has been targeted by a neo-Nazi protest, saying he was not “remotely intimidated by cosplaying losers” who – between racist chants – denigrated both major parties for abandoning “the white man”.
In social media video seen by The Australian, a group of 20 people clad head-to-toe in black with their faces obscured formed a barricade outside Senator Paterson’s office on York Street, South Melbourne, while an unmasked ringleader blared a speech into a megaphone beside a banner reading “Liberal or Labor Third World Australia”.
The man, who at one stage appears to make an illegal Nazi salute, led the group in chants of “Australia for the white man” and “hail victory”.
“Our people are displaced by swarms of foreigners. Every excess is allowed to fester in our city,” he said.
“Our people are deprived of housing and are forced to compete with foreigners here and abroad for stagnating wages of diminishing value. The Liberal Party is swapping us with third world populations, and the Labor Party is dragging us into third world conditions.
“Both are the same. Each is an interchangeable conspirator.”
Senator Paterson has been a vocal opponent of Nazism and anti-Semites, leading the Coalition’s policy in both regards. In a statement he said he was unperturbed in the wake of the protest.
“I certainly won’t be lectured on patriotism from people who worship a failed foreign regime. These protesters only make me more determined to protect Australians from extremists of all stripes,” he said.
“I’m not remotely intimidated by cosplaying losers who hide their faces behind masks.”
Victoria Police said it was investigating to see if it was an illegal protest.
“Police responded to a report of a protest in South Melbourne on 13 April. It is understood a group of 20 people were outside a business on York Street about 1.15pm,” a spokesperson said.
“The group dispersed before police arrived. Investigators are currently making inquiries into the incident and if any offences were committed.”
The protest, in which the ringleader warned politicians would not be left “unpunished”, comes less than a week after The Australian revealed Peter Dutton was allegedly the target of a 16-year-old Brisbane private school student charged with terror offences.
Anthony Albanese said, in the wake of the news, that he had also been subject to “a pretty serious incident” which was before the cops.
AFP Commissioner Reece Kershaw has warned threats against politicians are on the rise from 555 in the 2021-22 financial year to 1009 in 2023-24.
“Australia’s politicians and high office holders are being targeted because they have a public profile, because of the comments they have made in the media, or their positions on policy,” he said.
“The politicians who’ve been targeted are across the political spectrum.
“We are recording an increase in issue-motivated extremism and offenders who are quickly willing to use violence to further their cause.”
Labor MP Josh Burns’ electoral office was vandalised and set alight by protesters in June.
https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/james-paterson-unintimidated-by-loser-neonazis/news-story/ada24cda029bf84f540566a9f119ab5f
https://x.com/NoticerNews/status/1911381745942880733
https://qresear.ch/?q=Jacob+Hersant
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.51064
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22909412 (141119ZAPR25) Notable: How election candidates are boosting The Noticer, a news site promoting neo-Nazi ideologies - Federal election candidates and elected officials have been sharing content from a publication that regularly publishes articles promoting white supremacist and neo-Nazi ideologies. The Noticer runs white supremacist content alongside stories lifted from selected news sites, a model experts say is intended to lend the outlet a veneer of legitimacy. The site is popular among the far-right community, including Australia's most prominent neo-Nazi group, the National Socialist Network (NSN). United Australia Party senator Ralph Babet has openly shared and discussed content from the site on social media. In March, the senator commented on The Noticer's coverage of an Australia Day protest in Adelaide, where a group of NSN members were arrested, and banned from consorting under strict bail conditions. "If the information in this article is correct then Australia is heading towards a very bleak future where the courts are used to punish political opinion," Senator Babet wrote on X. The Noticer also appeared to have the inside track on the rally and its aftermath, with exclusive interviews and footage including a letter from a jailed NSN member it described as a "political prisoner". ABC NEWS Verify has also found Trumpet of Patriots leader Suellen Wrightson, Family First leader Lyle Shelton, and candidates from both One Nation, and the Libertarian Party, have shared the website's content.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>>/qresearch/22513153 (pb)
>>51063
How election candidates are boosting The Noticer, a news site promoting neo-Nazi ideologies
Kevin Nguyen and Michael Workman - 14 April 2025
1/2
Federal election candidates and elected officials have been sharing content from a publication that regularly publishes articles promoting white supremacist and neo-Nazi ideologies.
The Noticer runs white supremacist content alongside stories lifted from selected news sites, a model experts say is intended to lend the outlet a veneer of legitimacy.
The site is popular among the far-right community, including Australia's most prominent neo-Nazi group, the National Socialist Network (NSN).
United Australia Party senator Ralph Babet has openly shared and discussed content from the site on social media.
In March, the senator commented on The Noticer's coverage of an Australia Day protest in Adelaide, where a group of NSN members were arrested, and banned from consorting under strict bail conditions.
"If the information in this article is correct then Australia is heading towards a very bleak future where the courts are used to punish political opinion," Senator Babet wrote on X.
The Noticer also appeared to have the inside track on the rally and its aftermath, with exclusive interviews and footage including a letter from a jailed NSN member it described as a "political prisoner".
ABC NEWS Verify asked the senator if he was aware The Noticer publishes neo-Nazi and white supremacist content.
"I shared a true and factual article. Did you forget that I am a black immigrant and a democratically elected federal senator?" Senator Babet said.
The senator was born in Mauritius and renounced his citizenship shortly before the 2022 federal election.
ABC NEWS Verify has also found Trumpet of Patriots leader Suellen Wrightson, Family First leader Lyle Shelton, and candidates from both One Nation, and the Libertarian Party, have shared the website's content.
University of Canberra far-right extremism and political communication expert Jordan McSwiney said it appeared The Noticer was designed to continually attract new audiences and insert its more extremist ideologies into the national discourse.
"A lot of The Noticer's content is curated to mask the far-right nature of the website," Dr McSwiney said.
"This means people may share it without necessarily realising that they are sharing content from a far-right website."
Extreme right in plain sight
The Noticer launched in early 2024 promising "unbiased" news.
Despite claims it's not aligned with any political or activist group, or "affiliated with any ideology or ideological movement", the site regularly publishes content closely aligned with extreme-right talking points and figures.
The Noticer extensively publishes crime stories, but with a heavy focus on offences allegedly committed by perpetrators with a non-Caucasian background.
Ethnicity features as the focal point for dozens of articles across the website. Other articles are framed in a way which denigrates immigration, multiculturalism, Indigenous rights, feminism, and LGBTQI+ communities.
Far-right activists have written opinion pieces and articles for The Noticer.
Australian neo-Nazis have enthusiastically embraced its content. Leading neo-Nazi Joel Davis has authored several opinion pieces.
In an October video with NSN leader Tom Sewell, Mr Davis urged viewers to promote the outlet far-and-wide.
"Spread it … we need good quality media, dissident media, so there's a narrative that can counter mainstream bullshit," he said.
"It is literally one of our biggest weapons."
The articles of David Hiscox, who continues to publish for the anti-Semitic website XYZ, and American white supremacist Jared Taylor also appear on The Noticer.
The Noticer has declined to reveal the identity of its owners or its financial backers, but one of the site's contributors told ABC NEWS Verify they believed the site was "breaking even on ads".
ABC NEWS Verify saw Google Ads that promoted many Australian and international brands on the Noticer's landing page and articles.
These included Dick Smith, The Iconic, Temu, YouFoodz, and SkyScanner — brands do not choose where their advertising appears on via Google Ads.
A spokesman for Google said it had begun to remove ads from pages on the website (without specifying which pages) and could disable ads entirely if the website continues to breach its content or behavioural policies.
"We have strict publisher policies that prohibit ads from running alongside content promoting hate speech, hate groups and violence," he said.
"We've reviewed the site in question and have removed ads from pages that violate our policies."
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.51065
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22914039 (151040ZAPR25) Notable: Moscow bid to base military aircraft in Indonesia a ‘big problem’ for Australia - Indonesia has told the Albanese government that reports Russian aircraft would be allowed to operate from its soil were “simply not true”, after Moscow’s apparent bid thrust national security firmly back onto the Australian federal election campaign on Tuesday. Anthony Albanese was forced to admit his government was seeking “positive clarification” from Jakarta after Janes defence journal reported Russia had made a formal request to base several long-range military aircraft out of Indonesia’s Manuhua aircraft facility just 1300km from Australia’s mainland. The claims threatened to ignite a fresh security scandal with opposition leader Peter Dutton declaring another “catastrophic” intelligence failure by the government just weeks after Chinese live-fire exercises in the Tasman Sea and the circumnavigation of Australia by a Chinese strike force raised uncomfortable questions about Canberra’s intelligence capabilities, and capacity to defend its borders. Mr Albanese refused to say whether Australia’s “extremely positive relationship with our friends in Indonesia” would be harmed if it permitted Russia to station military aircraft so close to Australia’s mainland, but added he was seeking clarification from Jakarta. “We obviously do not want to see Russian influence in our region, very clearly,” he said. “We have a position, which is we stand with Ukraine, we regard Vladimir Putin as an authoritarian leader who has broken international law, who’s attacking the sovereignty of the nation of Ukraine.”
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>51062
Moscow bid to base military aircraft in Indonesia a ‘big problem’ for Australia
AMANDA HODGE - 15 April 2025
1/2
Indonesia has told the Albanese government that reports Russian aircraft would be allowed to operate from its soil were “simply not true”, after Moscow’s apparent bid thrust national security firmly back onto the Australian federal election campaign on Tuesday.
Anthony Albanese was forced to admit his government was seeking “positive clarification” from Jakarta after Janes defence journal reported Russia had made a formal request to base several long-range military aircraft out of Indonesia’s Manuhua aircraft facility just 1300km from Australia’s mainland.
The claims threatened to ignite a fresh security scandal with opposition leader Peter Dutton declaring another “catastrophic” intelligence failure by the government just weeks after Chinese live-fire exercises in the Tasman Sea and the circumnavigation of Australia by a Chinese strike force raised uncomfortable questions about Canberra’s intelligence capabilities, and capacity to defend its borders.
They also raised the spectre of the 2022 election when Labor attacked the Morrison government cover Beijing’s security deal with the Solomon Islands.
Mr Albanese refused to say whether Australia’s “extremely positive relationship with our friends in Indonesia” would be harmed if it permitted Russia to station military aircraft so close to Australia’s mainland, but added he was seeking clarification from Jakarta.
“We obviously do not want to see Russian influence in our region, very clearly,” he said.
“We have a position, which is we stand with Ukraine, we regard Vladimir Putin as an authoritarian leader who has broken international law, who’s attacking the sovereignty of the nation of Ukraine.”
Defence Minister Richard Marles also told reporters that he was “engaged with Indonesia on this request. We will keep engaging with Indonesia in a way that benefits a very close friend and a very close friendship between our two countries.”
But in a later statement, Mr Marles said he had spoken to his Indonesian counterpart Sjafrie Sjamsoeddin “and he has said to me in the clearest possible terms, reports of the prospect of Russian aircraft operating from Indonesia are simply not true”.
Moscow’s formal request to Mr Sjamsoeddin to base military aircraft out of Indonesia’s Manuhua air force base on Papua’s Biak Island was made through Russian Security Council secretary Sergei Shoigu after the two met in February, Janes defence journal reported on Tuesday, citing Indonesian government sources.
The request did not specify whether they would be Russian surveillance or strike aircraft.
“The Indonesian Ministry of Defence is now in consultations with policymakers from other government departments, including the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, with regards to how to proceed with the official request, but has yet to issue an official acknowledgment of this request,” the respected journal reported.
Indonesia has been steadily building ties with Moscow under President Prabowo Subianto, who wasted little time in signing up Indonesia to the China and Russia-led BRICS developing nations grouping after his October inauguration.
Weeks later the two nations conducted their first-ever bilateral naval drills in Indonesian waters – raising questions about Jakarta’s commitment to its non-alignment given Moscow’s ongoing war on Ukraine.
Mr Prabowo also met President Vladimir Putin in Moscow in June, just months after his stunning presidential election victory, and is scheduled to return there this June.
The Indonesian leader also met with the pariah nation’s first deputy Prime Minister in Jakarta on Tuesday to discuss “strategic agenda items” and growing bilateral ties.
But allowing Moscow to base aircraft on Indonesian soil would be a radical departure for Jakarta from a decades-long foreign policy commitment to neutrality and a major security headache for Australia.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.51066
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22914045 (151046ZAPR25) Notable: Video: ‘Deeply troubling’: PM, Dutton respond as Putin moves to use Indonesian air force base - Australian officials are working frantically to prevent Russia from being granted permission to base several long-range aircraft in Indonesia, just 1400 kilometres from the Australian mainland. Moscow’s audacious bid to secure a permanent military foothold in the Indo-Pacific thrust national security to the centre of the federal election campaign, echoing the Solomon Islands’ decision to strike a wide-ranging security pact with China during the 2022 campaign. Moscow and Jakarta have rapidly deepened their military ties since Indonesian President Prabowo Subianto took power last October, raising alarm bells in Canberra. Defence Minister Richard Marles said the government had already been engaging with Indonesia “at a senior level” about the issue, as he stressed that Jakarta had not responded to Moscow’s request. Moscow has lodged an official request for Russian Aerospace Forces aircraft to be based at a facility in Indonesia’s easternmost province, the respected military website Janes first reported on Tuesday. The Russian request reportedly seeks to base several long-range aircraft at the Manuhua Air Force Base at Biak Numfor in the province of Papua, which borders Papua New Guinea. The base, which is home to the Indonesian Air Force’s Aviation Squadron 27, is approximately 1380 kilometres from Darwin.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>51062
>>51065
‘Deeply troubling’: PM, Dutton respond as Putin moves to use Indonesian air force base
Matthew Knott - April 15, 2025
Australian officials are working frantically to prevent Russia from being granted permission to base several long-range aircraft in Indonesia, just 1400 kilometres from the Australian mainland.
Moscow’s audacious bid to secure a permanent military foothold in the Indo-Pacific thrust national security to the centre of the federal election campaign, echoing the Solomon Islands’ decision to strike a wide-ranging security pact with China during the 2022 campaign.
Moscow and Jakarta have rapidly deepened their military ties since Indonesian President Prabowo Subianto took power last October, raising alarm bells in Canberra.
Defence Minister Richard Marles said the government had already been engaging with Indonesia “at a senior level” about the issue, as he stressed that Jakarta had not responded to Moscow’s request.
Moscow has lodged an official request for Russian Aerospace Forces aircraft to be based at a facility in Indonesia’s easternmost province, the respected military website Janes first reported on Tuesday.
The Russian request reportedly seeks to base several long-range aircraft at the Manuhua Air Force Base at Biak Numfor in the province of Papua, which borders Papua New Guinea.
The base, which is home to the Indonesian Air Force’s Aviation Squadron 27, is approximately 1380 kilometres from Darwin.
Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said the government was “seeking further clarification” from Jakarta about the request, adding he believed the Indonesia-Australia relationship has “never been better than it is right now”.
“We obviously do not want to see Russian influence in our region,” Albanese said.
Opposition Leader Peter Dutton described the news as a “very troubling” and “deeply destabilising” development for the region.
Labelling Russian President Vladimir Putin a “murderous dictator” who had illegally invaded Ukraine, Dutton said that “we don’t welcome his presence in our neighbourhood at all”.
Dutton said it would represent a “catastrophic failure” of diplomacy if Albanese and Foreign Minister Penny Wong were not aware of Moscow’s request before reports emerged in the media.
One of Putin’s most senior officials, Sergei Shoigu, secretary of the Russian Federation Security Council, travelled to Jakarta in February to meet with Indonesian Defence Minister Sjafrie Sjamsoeddin.
The visit came after Indonesia conducted its first-ever joint naval drills with Russia in November as part of Prabowo’s push to deepen defence ties with Moscow.
In the same month Australia and Indonesia signed a defence co-operation pact enabling the nations to conduct complex joint military exercises and making it easier to operate in each other’s countries.
The Indonesian defence ministry was contacted for comment.
Matthew Sussex, an expert in Russian strategic policy at the Australian National University, said the prospect of Russian long-range aircraft being based in Indonesia would cause anxiety within the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade.
“Russia is trying to increase its Indo-Pacific military footprint,” Sussex said, adding that Moscow was seeking to drive a wedge between nations such as Indonesia and the West following the election of US President Donald Trump.
This would ultimately serve Beijing’s strategic interests in the region given its close ties to Moscow, he said.
Trump frustrated Jakarta by announcing he would impose a hefty 32 per cent tariff on Indonesian exports to the US earlier this month, before suspending a decision for 90 days when US financial markets went into meltdown.
Chinese President Xi Jinping has embarked on a tour of South-East Asia, beginning in Vietnam, in a bid to position Beijing as the partner of choice for the strategically significant region.
Sussex said that granting Moscow’s request would call into question Jakarta’s longstanding policy of “non-alignment”, in which it has sought to maintain friendly relations with competing major powers.
Mick Ryan, a retired major general in the Australian Army, said: “If true, this would have very significant political and military implications for Australia.”
Prabowo travelled to Moscow last July to meet with Putin, and Indonesia officially joined the Russia-led BRICS grouping in January.
https://www.smh.com.au/politics/federal/vladimir-putin-seeks-accessto-indonesian-air-force-base-reports-20250415-p5lrvb.html
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SVqmWyeGkK8
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.51067
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22918905 (161030ZAPR25) Notable: Canberra confirms Indonesia won't host Russian planes at air force base - Indonesia's defence minister has assured Australia it will not allow Russian planes to be based in Papua province after a United States media outlet reported that Moscow was pushing to get access to a military base in Papua. The defence news website Janes has reported that Moscow has launched an official request to base Russian aircraft at the Manuhua Air Force Base at Biak Numfor in the Indonesian province of Papua. The Kremlin, when asked about the report that Russia has asked Indonesia for permission to base aircraft in its territory, said there was a lot of fake news around. In 2017, Russia flew two nuclear-capable bombers on a patrol mission out of the base on what appeared to be an intelligence gathering exercise. The prospect of Russian military aircraft based so close to the Australian mainland would set off alarm bells in Canberra and cause a furious political debate on the campaign trail. Australian officials scrambled to verify the reports and on Tuesday evening Richard Marles told the ABC that he'd spoken with his Indonesian counterpart. "I have spoken to my counterpart, Sjafrie Sjamsoeddin, the minister for defence, and he has said to me in the clearest possible terms, reports of the prospect of Russian aircraft operating from Indonesia are simply not true," he said. The ABC has been told that the Indonesian defence minister told Mr Marles he had not received any Russian request to access the base - although that doesn't rule out the possibility it was raised at a more junior level.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>51065
Canberra confirms Indonesia won't host Russian planes at air force base
Stephen Dziedzic and Bill Birtles - 15 April 2025
1/2
Indonesia's defence minister has assured Australia it will not allow Russian planes to be based in Papua province after a United States media outlet reported that Moscow was pushing to get access to a military base in Papua.
The defence news website Janes has reported that Moscow has launched an official request to base Russian aircraft at the Manuhua Air Force Base at Biak Numfor in the Indonesian province of Papua.
The Kremlin, when asked about the report that Russia has asked Indonesia for permission to base aircraft in its territory, said there was a lot of fake news around.
In 2017, Russia flew two nuclear-capable bombers on a patrol mission out of the base on what appeared to be an intelligence gathering exercise.
The prospect of Russian military aircraft based so close to the Australian mainland would set off alarm bells in Canberra and cause a furious political debate on the campaign trail.
Australian officials scrambled to verify the reports and on Tuesday evening Richard Marles told the ABC that he'd spoken with his Indonesian counterpart.
"I have spoken to my counterpart, Sjafrie Sjamsoeddin, the minister for defence, and he has said to me in the clearest possible terms, reports of the prospect of Russian aircraft operating from Indonesia are simply not true," he said.
The ABC has been told that the Indonesian defence minister told Mr Marles he had not received any Russian request to access the base — although that doesn't rule out the possibility it was raised at a more junior level.
Earlier, Foreign Minister Penny Wong told reporters that Australian officials were seeking more information from Jakarta about the report.
'Not a done deal'
One source in Jakarta played down the likelihood of Indonesia granting the request, saying it would compromise its long-standing foreign policy principles.
Malcolm Davis from the Australian Strategic Policy Institute told the ABC that Indonesia could well reject the request from Russia.
"This is not yet a done deal, and it may well fall through," he said.
"The Australians, the Japanese and the Americans will be putting pressure on the Indonesians to say no," Mr Davis said.
But he said if Jakarta did give the green light, then more US and Australian military assets would be put in the direct range of Russian military forces.
Australia has been working to rapidly expand defence and security ties with Indonesia, but Moscow has also been drawing closer to Jakarta, with one of Russia's senior military officials Sergei Shogiu visiting Indonesia in February.
And while Russian President Vladimir Putin's main focus remains his war on Ukraine, he's been working to expand military ties further abroad, with Russia and Indonesia holding naval drills in the Java Sea in November.
At the time, Russia's ambassador to Indonesia, Sergei Tolchenov, said the exercises were "a significant event" and that "the navies of our countries are ready to enhance mutual trust and understanding to cooperate in different areas".
In July last year, Russia's Defence Secretary Andrei Belousov also held talks with Prabowo Subianto, who was Indonesia's defence minister at the time but is now the country's president.
The Australian government believes both Russia and China are also increasingly focused on the growing US military presence in Darwin and the Northern Territory.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.51068
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22918914 (161037ZAPR25) Notable: Russian envoy raises heat over Indonesia base request claim - Russia has launched an incendiary broadside against Australia’s military posture in the Asia-Pacific, linking its military co-operation with Indonesia to the AUKUS defence pact and “particularly alarming” plans to deploy US intermediate-range missiles on Australian soil that would put Indonesia within range. Vladimir Putin’s envoy to Jakarta, Sergei Tolchenov, made the extraordinary statements amid an ongoing political firestorm in Australia over reports of a Russian request for military access to an Indonesian air force base in Papua. Mr Tolchenov’s statement appeared designed to add fuel to the fire by expressly avoiding any confirmation that Moscow had asked to station long-range military aircraft at Manuhua air force base, just 1300km from the Australian mainland. All interactions between Russian and Indonesian armed forces were aimed at strengthening their mutual defensive capabilities, were not aimed at any third countries and posed no security threat to the Asia-Pacific region, he said. But the same could not be said of Australia, the ambassador intimated, taking aim at Canberra’s ambitions to acquire nuclear-powered submarines under the AUKUS partnership and the large US military contingents it hosts. “When it comes to any challenges to regional stability, they are more likely to arise from the rotational deployment of large military contingents from extra-regional states on Australian territory, including the provision of airfields for the landing of strategic bombers and port infrastructure for visits by nuclear-powered submarines,” Mr Tolchenov said.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>51065
Russian envoy raises heat over Indonesia base request claim
AMANDA HODGE - 16 April 2025
1/2
Russia has launched an incendiary broadside against Australia’s military posture in the Asia-Pacific, linking its military co-operation with Indonesia to the AUKUS defence pact and “particularly alarming” plans to deploy US intermediate-range missiles on Australian soil that would put Indonesia within range.
Vladimir Putin’s envoy to Jakarta, Sergei Tolchenov, made the extraordinary statements amid an ongoing political firestorm in Australia over reports of a Russian request for military access to an Indonesian air force base in Papua.
Jakarta’s foreign policy establishment has warned it would be “unthinkable” for the country to host any foreign military base on its soil, and Indonesian Defence Ministry spokesman Frega Wenas Inkiriwang said there was nothing on Russians leasing air bases in the minutes from February meetings between Indonesian and Russian security officials.
The Albanese government has refused to respond to Moscow’s antagonism, while also maintaining its silence amid questions over whether it had been assured by Indonesia that there had been no such request or whether the request had been denied.
Indonesian Defence Minister Sjafrie Sjamsoeddin told his Australian counterpart Richard Marles on Tuesday a report carried in the respected Janes defence journal saying Indonesia was considering Moscow’s request was “simply not true”.
Mr Tolchenov’s statement appeared designed to add fuel to the fire by expressly avoiding any confirmation that Moscow had asked to station long-range military aircraft at Manuhua air force base, just 1300km from the Australian mainland.
“Concerning the inquiries coming from Canberra to the Indonesian officials about the alleged plans to establish in Indonesia a base for long-range aircraft of the Russian Air-Space Forces, we would like to draw the attention to the following,” his statement said. “Military co-operation is an integral part of the intergovernmental relations between the Russian Federation and the Republic of Indonesia. It is solely of bilateral character and based on a relevant legal framework and the national legislation of each respective country.”
All interactions between Russian and Indonesian armed forces were aimed at strengthening their mutual defensive capabilities, were not aimed at any third countries and posed no security threat to the Asia-Pacific region, he said.
But the same could not be said of Australia, the ambassador intimated, taking aim at Canberra’s ambitions to acquire nuclear-powered submarines under the AUKUS partnership and the large US military contingents it hosts.
“When it comes to any challenges to regional stability, they are more likely to arise from the rotational deployment of large military contingents from extra-regional states on Australian territory, including the provision of airfields for the landing of strategic bombers and port infrastructure for visits by nuclear-powered submarines,” Mr Tolchenov said.
“Particularly alarming are the currently discussed plans to deploy the US’s intermediate-range missiles in Australia, which would put ASEAN countries – including Indonesia – within its range, as well as the acquisition by the Royal Australian Navy of nuclear-powered submarines under the AUKUS trilateral partnership.
“The latter raises serious concerns about the effectiveness of established nuclear weapon-free zones in the Asia-Pacific region, such as the South Pacific Nuclear Weapon-Free Zone (Treaty of Rarotonga) and the Southeast Asia Nuclear Weapon-Free Zone (the Bangkok Treaty).”
It came as Anthony Albanese on Wednesday accused Peter Dutton of “dialling up” national security threats and “verballing” Indonesian President Prabowo Subianto after the Opposition Leader incorrectly suggested Mr Prabowo had spoken publicly on the issue.
“What we saw from Peter Dutton was an extraordinary overreach. He verballed the President of Indonesia,” the Prime Minister said while campaigning in Melbourne. But Mr Albanese, Mr Marles and Foreign Minister Penny Wong all declined to say on Wednesday whether the Indonesian government had denied a request had been made or whether it had said one had been explicitly declined.
The Prime Minister went as far as to suggest the initial report of the Russian request in Janes, could be incorrect.
“You’re assuming the Janes report is correct and there is no basis for you assuming that,” he told one reporter.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.51069
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22918937 (161052ZAPR25) Notable: ‘I was wrong’: Coalition frontbencher apologises for saying Russia and China want Labor to win election - Coalition frontbencher Bridget McKenzie has apologised for claiming that Russia and China want Labor to win the May 3 election, saying she based her comments on mistaken information. McKenzie, the Coalition’s transport spokeswoman, made the dramatic intervention into the debate on Wednesday afternoon by claiming that Russia and China had both made clear they wanted Dutton to be defeated. “The defence minister of Russia [Andrey Belousov] and the Chinese leader [Xi Jinping] both have made very public comments that they do not want to see Peter Dutton as the prime minister of our country,” McKenzie told the ABC. “There’s two world leaders who don’t want to see Peter Dutton become prime minister of our country. That’s all I’m saying. That’s Russia and China.” Asked on what basis she made her comments, McKenzie said: “I made a mistake, I was wrong with what I said about the Russian defence minister and Chinese leader. I can’t verify it.” Peter Dutton on Wednesday denied he had “verballed” Prabowo by claiming he had publicly announced the proposal, saying he was referencing a “very credible military website” in Janes. “The prospect of having Russia with a greater presence in our region is very real, and there are a lot of questions that the [Albanese] government still has to answer,” Dutton said. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese accused Dutton of “extraordinary overreach”, saying: “He always shoots from the hip. And when you are either the prime minister or the alternative prime minister of this country, what you need to do is to have a considered approach to our international relations.”
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50833
>>51065
>>51054
‘I was wrong’: Coalition frontbencher apologises for saying Russia and China want Labor to win election
Matthew Knott - April 16, 2025
Coalition frontbencher Bridget McKenzie has apologised for claiming that Russia and China want Labor to win the May 3 election, saying she based her comments on mistaken information.
McKenzie, the Coalition’s transport spokeswoman, made the dramatic intervention into the debate on Wednesday afternoon by claiming that Russia and China had both made clear they wanted Dutton to be defeated.
“The defence minister of Russia [Andrey Belousov] and the Chinese leader [Xi Jinping] both have made very public comments that they do not want to see Peter Dutton as the prime minister of our country,” McKenzie told the ABC. “There’s two world leaders who don’t want to see Peter Dutton become prime minister of our country. That’s all I’m saying. That’s Russia and China.”
Asked on what basis she made her comments, McKenzie said: “I made a mistake, I was wrong with what I said about the Russian defence minister and Chinese leader. I can’t verify it.”
Senior Labor ministers went on the attack against Dutton on Wednesday, branding him reckless and unfit for high office for falsely claiming that Indonesian President Prabowo Subianto had announced that Moscow was seeking to base several long-range aircraft in Indonesia.
On Tuesday evening, Indonesia’s Defence Minister, Sjafrie Sjamsoeddin, told Defence Minister Richard Marles that “reports of the prospect of Russian aircraft operating from Indonesia are simply not true”, but the Coalition urged Jakarta to go further in its assurances.
Opposition home affairs minister James Paterson told Sky News: “I look forward to official confirmation from the Indonesian government that not only will Russian aircraft not be based in Indonesia, but they won’t have any sort of visiting or access arrangements at all because Indonesia is an incredibly important national security partner for Australia.
“We work very co-operatively with them on things like people smuggling, counter-terrorism, anti-narcotics trafficking, and other important issues, and we want to make sure that relationship remains strong.”
Greg Fealy, an expert in Indonesian politics at the Australian National University, said Indonesia jealously guarded its independence and would be likely to perceive Paterson’s comments as meddling.
“Prabowo will not appreciate anyone pressuring him into not co-operating with other nations, including Russia,” he said.
Prabowo has sought to deepen defence ties with Moscow since he came to power in October, with Indonesia and Russia conducting joint naval drills for the first time last year.
In a statement, Russia’s ambassador to Indonesia, Sergei Tolchenov, referred to the “alleged plans to establish in Indonesia a base for long-range aircrafts of the Russian Air-Space Forces” and argued Australia was destabilising by allowing large numbers of US troops to rotate through the country and port visits from nuclear-powered submarines.
“Military co-operation is an integral part of the intergovernmental relations between the Russian Federation and the Republic of Indonesia,” Tolchenov said.
“All interactions between Russian and Indonesian armed forces and Indonesia were aimed at strengthening the defensive capabilities of both sides, not at any third countries, and posed no security threat to the Asia-Pacific region.”
Peter Dutton on Wednesday denied he had “verballed” Prabowo by claiming he had publicly announced the proposal, saying he was referencing a “very credible military website” in Janes.
“The prospect of having Russia with a greater presence in our region is very real, and there are a lot of questions that the [Albanese] government still has to answer,” Dutton said.
Prime Minister Anthony Albanese accused Dutton of “extraordinary overreach”, saying: “He always shoots from the hip. And when you are either the prime minister or the alternative prime minister of this country, what you need to do is to have a considered approach to our international relations.”
Treasurer Jim Chalmers said Dutton’s initial comments were a “disqualifying moment”, labelling him “temperamentally unfit to manage our relationships in the world”.
Foreign Minister Penny Wong said Dutton had “fabricated” a comment by Prabowo to score political points as she accused him of being “too reckless and too aggro to be the prime minister”.
Sjamsoeddin said the Janes report of a Russian request to base long-range aircraft on Biak Island was “absolutely untrue”.
“Indonesia adheres to the principle of an independent and active foreign policy,” he said in a statement. “We do not allow foreign military bases on our soil.”
https://www.theage.com.au/politics/federal/aggro-reckless-labor-savages-dutton-over-indonesia-remarks-20250416-p5ls7g.html
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.51070
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22927252 (180431ZAPR25) Notable: ‘It is accurate’: Website stands by controversial Russian aircraft story - The specialist military publication that first reported an alleged push by Russia to base long-range aircraft in Indonesia says it stands by the accuracy of its story as Jakarta says it welcomes visits from friendly foreign militaries. Military publication Janes first reported earlier this week that Russia had requested to base long-range warplanes in Indonesia, which Australia’s neighbour disputed as the issue erupted into the election campaign. Ridzwan Rahmat, the senior journalist who reported the story, said in a statement: “We at Janes stand by this story and it is accurate. “This story was written following a few weeks of speaking to well-placed sources within the Indonesian government. “Furthermore, to protect these sources, we will not release this information or further details of these conversations.” The publication, which began publishing books and magazines in 1898, has a loyal following in the defence and national security community. Quoting anonymous Indonesian government sources and documents, Janes reported that Russia had asked to base several long-range aircraft at the Manuhua Air Force Base at Biak Island in the province of Papua. Indonesian Defence Minister Sjafrie Sjamsoeddin said on Wednesday that the Janes report was “absolutely untrue” and Indonesia would “not allow foreign military bases on our soil.”
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50833
>>51065
>>51067
‘It is accurate’: Website stands by controversial Russian aircraft story
Matthew Knott - April 17, 2025
The specialist military publication that first reported an alleged push by Russia to base long-range aircraft in Indonesia says it stands by the accuracy of its story as Jakarta says it welcomes visits from friendly foreign militaries.
The saga has continued to buffet the Coalition’s election campaign, with Nationals frontbencher Bridget McKenzie making a series of gaffes about Russia and China’s attitudes to Australia and Opposition Leader Peter Dutton admitting at a leaders debate that he had made a false claim about the request.
Military publication Janes first reported earlier this week that Russia had requested to base long-range warplanes in Indonesia, which Australia’s neighbour disputed as the issue erupted into the election campaign.
Ridzwan Rahmat, the senior journalist who reported the story, said in a statement: “We at Janes stand by this story and it is accurate.
“This story was written following a few weeks of speaking to well-placed sources within the Indonesian government.
“Furthermore, to protect these sources, we will not release this information or further details of these conversations.”
The publication, which began publishing books and magazines in 1898, has a loyal following in the defence and national security community.
Quoting anonymous Indonesian government sources and documents, Janes reported that Russia had asked to base several long-range aircraft at the Manuhua Air Force Base at Biak Island in the province of Papua.
In his first statement on the matter, Indonesian Foreign Ministry spokesman Rolliansyah Soemirat said that “Indonesia has never granted permission to any country to build or possess a military base in Indonesia”.
Leaving open the prospect of regular Russian military visits to Indonesia, Soemirat added: “As a country with a longstanding tradition of a free and active foreign policy, Indonesia will receive and permit military aircraft or vessels from other nations on peaceful missions to visit Indonesia.”
Russia and Indonesia held their first joint naval exercises last November in a sign of deepening defence ties under Indonesian President Prabowo Subianto.
Indonesian Defence Minister Sjafrie Sjamsoeddin said on Wednesday that the Janes report was “absolutely untrue” and Indonesia would “not allow foreign military bases on our soil.”
Russia’s ambassador to Indonesia Sergei Tolchenov issued a lengthy statement on Wednesday evening that did not deny Moscow was seeking to base military aircraft in Indonesia and appeared to provide justification for such a move.
“Military co-operation is an integral part of the intergovernmental relations between the Russian Federation and the Republic of Indonesia,” Tolchenov said.
Former Home Affairs Department secretary Mike Pezzullo said semantics could explain the conflicting claims, and that Russia was clearly interested in deepening military ties with Indonesia.
“We shouldn’t assume that the Russians asked for a base or even a lease for a base,” he said. “The key is being able to operate from that airfield [on Biak Island] which is strategically located.”
In an ABC television interview on Tuesday, McKenzie claimed when asked about the topic that “the defence minister of Russia [Andrey Belousov] and the Chinese leader [Xi Jinping] both have made very public comments that they do not want to see Peter Dutton as the prime minister of our country”.
The Coalition transport and infrastructure spokesman later told this masthead: “I made a mistake, I was wrong with what I said about the Russian defence minister and Chinese leader.”
Asked the Today program on Thursday why she had made the initial claim, McKenzie said: “Well, I think it’s pretty clear from President Xi’s public commentary that he finds Albo a very handsome boy.”
In fact, it was Chinese Premier Li Qiang, not Xi, who called Albanese a “handsome boy” in 2023.
Senior Labor ministers went on the attack against Dutton on Wednesday, branding him reckless and unfit for high office for falsely claiming that Prabowo had publicly announced that Moscow was seeking to base long-range aircraft in Indonesia.
After refusing to back down from his comments at a press conference on Wednesday, Dutton conceded in the leaders’ debate that night that he had made a mistake and was relying on anonymous sources quoted in the Janes article.
Shadow home affairs minister James Paterson told Sky News that the Russian ambassador to Indonesia’s statement “very clearly implies that the request was made from Russia to Indonesia” and demanded the government provide a briefing, as promised, to the opposition on the matter.
https://www.smh.com.au/politics/federal/it-is-accurate-website-stands-by-controversial-russian-aircraft-story-20250417-p5lsfh.html
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.51071
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22927418 (180546ZAPR25) Notable: ATO wins freezing orders against fighter pilot accused of training Chinese air force - Former RAF top gun Keith Andrew Hartley, for years based in Australia, has spent the past three years fending off allegations of betraying his country and its allies by providing “training involving the use of arms or practising military exercises” to People’s Liberation Army pilots between June 2018 and January 2022. His Adelaide home was raided in 2022 as part of an investigation into his role in the scandal as the chief operating officer of controversial South African company Test Flying Academy of South Africa (TFASA), which has been accused of paying millions to dozens of former British flying aces to train Chinese fighter pilots. Included are allegations Hartley and TFASA recruited former RAF pilots - offered more $500,000 per year — to help train Chinese flyers to take off and land on the country’s new aircraft carriers, now emerging as a major potential threat to Australian, US and British interests in the Pacific region. Hartley has consistently denied any wrongdoing, and no charges have been laid. The Australian Federal Police (AFP) declined to comment on the status of their investigation into Hartley on Thursday. The former jet pilot, who flew under the call sign “Hooligan”, has now had his local assets frozen by the federal court for allegedly ducking millions in local taxes related to his training business in China. In a secret case brought by the Australian Taxation Office last month, the ATO won freezing orders against Hartley over allegations he owes more than $3m in back taxes related to his business in China. The ATO also sought freezing orders worth almost $4.2m against his privately-owned company Slugwash. Hartley fled the country fearing arrest by Australian security services in early 2023, according to the court, and has not returned since.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>>/qresearch/22351487 (pb)
ATO wins freezing orders against fighter pilot accused of training Chinese air force
Nick Evans - April 10, 2025
1/2
If the coppers can’t get you, the tax man will. That’s been the case since Al Capone got banged up for tax evasion in the 1930s.
And, it’s still the case for a former British fighter pilot who has outraged Western governments for allegedly training the Chinese air force, who has just had the proceeds of the controversial business frozen by the Australian federal court.
Former RAF top gun Keith Andrew Hartley, for years based in Australia, has spent the past three years fending off allegations of betraying his country and its allies by providing “training involving the use of arms or practising military exercises” to People’s Liberation Army pilots between June 2018 and January 2022.
His Adelaide home was raided in 2022 as part of an investigation into his role in the scandal as the chief operating officer of controversial South African company Test Flying Academy of South Africa (TFASA), which has been accused of paying millions to dozens of former British flying aces to train Chinese fighter pilots.
Included are allegations Hartley and TFASA recruited former RAF pilots — offered more $500,000 per year — to help train Chinese flyers to take off and land on the country’s new aircraft carriers, now emerging as a major potential threat to Australian, US and British interests in the Pacific region.
Hartley has consistently denied any wrongdoing, and no charges have been laid. The Australian Federal Police (AFP) declined to comment on the status of their investigation into Hartley on Thursday.
But, if ASIO and the AFP miss, there’s always the ATO.
Margin Call can reveal the former jet pilot, who flew under the call sign “Hooligan”, has now had his local assets frozen by the federal court for allegedly ducking millions in local taxes related to his training business in China.
In a secret case brought by the Australian Taxation Office last month, the ATO won freezing orders against Hartley over allegations he owes more than $3m in back taxes related to his business in China. The ATO also sought freezing orders worth almost $4.2m against his privately-owned company Slugwash.
Hartley fled the country fearing arrest by Australian security services in early 2023, according to the court, and has not returned since.
The ATO presented evidence to the court that Hartley was aware ASIO and the Australian Federal Police were closing in on a case against him by November 2022, with emails to a business partner at a “procurement entity for the People’s Republic of China” saying he planned to move money out of the country in case he was arrested.
“I’m expecting to get tapped on arrival by the Aussie security guys and possibly the federal police as well,” the email said. “If they get hard, one potential outcome is a freezing of any assets that they deem have come from illegal activity. Of course, to do that they need to prosecute me successfully, which might be difficult, but I’d be prudent to mitigate any resulting risk to my assets.
“I’m happy to forgo any future dividends in exchange for removing the Aussie risks. I’ve also bounced the idea off my Aussie accountant who agrees it creates no problems with the tax man,” the emails say.
Sadly for Hartley, his accountant got it wrong.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.51072
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22927429 (180554ZAPR25) Notable: Macquarie University backflips on acknowledgement of country assessment, will not do in future - Macquarie University has bowed to pressure and will no longer mark law students on their delivery of an acknowledgement of country. But the university maintained the ability to deliver an acknowledgement of country was an “authentic, professional skill relevant to contemporary legal practice”. The Australian revealed last month that a law unit called ‘age and the law’ at Macquarie University marked students on their ability to deliver welcome or acknowledgement of country, in a move labelled “indoctrination” by conservative Indigenous leaders. The presentation was worth 30 per cent of the final course mark and students were told the acknowledgement of country was one of the key five marking areas. A high-distinction acknowledgement of country would see a student present “a brief, thoughtful, exceptionally well-written, culturally respectful acknowledgement of country or welcome to country at the beginning of the presentation”, the marking rubric read. But on Thursday, the university said a “thorough review” found the acknowledgement of country component of the verbal assessment was “not appropriate”. “An acknowledgement of country will not form part of the assessment task in question in future offerings of the unit LAWS5005,” a university statement read. “The unit convener has advised students that they are able to opt out of the acknowledgement of country and that students will not fail the unit, nor will their grades be adversely affected, should they decide to do so.”
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50803
>>50816
Macquarie University backflips on acknowledgement of country assessment, will not do in future
JANET ALBRECHTSEN and NOAH YIM - 17 April 2025
Macquarie University has bowed to pressure and will no longer mark law students on their delivery of an acknowledgement of country.
But the university maintained the ability to deliver an acknowledgement of country was an “authentic, professional skill relevant to contemporary legal practice”.
The Australian revealed last month that a law unit called ‘age and the law’ at Macquarie University marked students on their ability to deliver welcome or acknowledgement of country, in a move labelled “indoctrination” by conservative Indigenous leaders.
The presentation was worth 30 per cent of the final course mark and students were told the acknowledgement of country was one of the key five marking areas.
A high-distinction acknowledgement of country would see a student present “a brief, thoughtful, exceptionally well-written, culturally respectful acknowledgement of country or welcome to country at the beginning of the presentation”, the marking rubric read.
Last month, university spokesperson said the acknowledgement of country was “relevant both to this specific task and to the overall learning outcomes of the unit”.
But on Thursday, the university said a “thorough review” found the acknowledgement of country component of the verbal assessment was “not appropriate”.
“An acknowledgement of country will not form part of the assessment task in question in future offerings of the unit LAWS5005,” a university statement read.
“The unit convener has advised students that they are able to opt out of the acknowledgement of country and that students will not fail the unit, nor will their grades be adversely affected, should they decide to do so.
“The university’s standard practice of unit moderation will ensure this is the case.”
However, the university maintained “a review of contemporary legal practice, showed an acknowledgment of country is an authentic, professional skill relevant to contemporary legal practice and commonly employed across the sector, including in law firms, government agencies and legal reform submissions”.
A university spokesman said the university was “deeply committed to academic freedom and respectful debate, where diverse ideas and knowledge can be explored in a spirit of curiosity, open-mindedness and progress”.
“The Macquarie Law School has taken immediate action to address the issues raised by one student and to make future improvements.
“These actions conform with the university’s ongoing assessment strategy and commitment to authentic, well-aligned assessment tasks that are relevant and empowering for our students.”
https://www.theaustralian.com.au/higher-education/macquarie-university-backflips-on-acknowledgement-of-country-assessment-will-not-do-in-future/news-story/525f091868348b46d677fe15f817822b
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.51073
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22927645 (180831ZAPR25) Notable: Judge lashes child gender-medicine experts in blow for clinic - One of Australia’s foremost child gender medicine experts has been ruled to have misled the Family Court when giving evidence to support a mother who wished to prescribe her child puberty blockers, in a judgment that calls into question the integrity of one of the nation’s peak gender clinics. Justice Andrew Strum’s extraordinary judgment, which stripped the mother of custody and effectively prevented the child from accessing treatment, criticised the approach of hospitals to children questioning their gender, saying the decision to “affirm unreservedly” any child that raises concerns over their gender is “oddly binary”. He also found the gender clinic that treated the 12-year-old failed to formally give a gender dysphoria diagnosis until the court proceedings had commenced, despite having treated the child since they were six. The case marks the first time a sitting judge has blown a hole in the country’s gender-affirming treatment of care guidelines. While Justice Strum does not comment generally on the gender-affirming care model adopted by the gender clinic at the child’s hospital, the judgment raises big questions regarding the treatment of gender-incongruent children. The matter centred on the biologically male child whose mother believes is gender dysphoric and should be prescribed puberty blockers, but whose father wanted to hold off on treatment and “let the child be the child”. In handing down his judgment, Justice Strum sided with the father who did not wish to “pigeonhole” his child, and decided “all options” in the child’s life should be open.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>>/qresearch/22333802 (pb)
>>>/qresearch/22451021 (pb)
>>>/qresearch/22490679 (pb)
Judge lashes child gender-medicine experts in blow for clinic
ELLIE DUDLEY - April 09, 2025
1/2
One of Australia’s foremost child gender medicine experts has been ruled to have misled the Family Court when giving evidence to support a mother who wished to prescribe her child puberty blockers, in a judgment that calls into question the integrity of one of the nation’s peak gender clinics.
Justice Andrew Strum’s extraordinary judgment, which stripped the mother of custody and effectively prevented the child from accessing treatment, criticised the approach of hospitals to children questioning their gender, saying the decision to “affirm unreservedly” any child that raises concerns over their gender is “oddly binary”.
He also found the gender clinic that treated the 12-year-old failed to formally give a gender dysphoria diagnosis until the court proceedings had commenced, despite having treated the child since they were six.
The case marks the first time a sitting judge has blown a hole in the country’s gender-affirming treatment of care guidelines. While Justice Strum does not comment generally on the gender-affirming care model adopted by the gender clinic at the child’s hospital, the judgment raises big questions regarding the treatment of gender-incongruent children.
The matter centred on the biologically male child whose mother believes is gender dysphoric and should be prescribed puberty blockers, but whose father wanted to hold off on treatment and “let the child be the child”.
In handing down his judgment, Justice Strum sided with the father who did not wish to “pigeonhole” his child, and decided “all options” in the child’s life should be open.
“This is a case about a child, and a relatively young one at that; not one about the cause of transgender people,” Justice Strum wrote. “As this child grows, develops and matures, and explores and experiences life, the child might, with the related benefits of the passage of time and the acquisition of balanced understanding, come to identify as a transgender female and might elect to undergo some form of medical treatment, to affirm and/or align with that identity. But, similarly, with those benefits, the child might not do so, and for a variety of reasons.
“At this stage in the child’s life, all options should be left open, without any unacceptable risk of harm to the child.”
In his decision, Justice Strum declared gender dysphoria was not “immutable” but could be influenced by external factors, placing him at odds with the Australian Standards of Care, which back a gender-affirming treatment model.
He took issue with the “concerning” evidence given by one of the nation’s leading child gender experts – anonymised as Associate Professor L – in relation to the landmark UK Cass review.
According to the judgment, the professor “disagrees with much” of the Cass Review, which recommended limitations on medication for gender-dysphoric children.
“It is submitted by the Independent Children’s Lawyer ... and I agree, that Associate Professor L’s responses were ‘misleading or omitted findings/material that detracted from (their) opinion’ contrary to the obligations as an expert witness,” he wrote.
“Some of the many examples proffered are concerning.”
He found Associate Professor L and their colleague, Dr N, provided weak evidence to support the mother’s opinion that gender identity was “internal” and “not open to external influence”.
“The mother, in cross-examination, rejected even the possibility that external factors or influence might have any role to play in the child’s gender identity,” Justice Strum wrote. “However, neither of those experts were able to point to any empirical or substantive basis for their opinion but, rather, only to anecdotal reports from transgender adults about their experience of their gender identity.”
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.51074
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22927657 (180852ZAPR25) Notable: Judgment defines the debate and slams the dogma on puberty blockers, hormones and surgery - Family Court Justice Andrew Strum is careful to state that his 58,000-word decision is about the best interests of a 12-year-old boy and not about transgender rights. Even so, his decision is the best-yet judicial guide to the debate about youth gender clinics. And it is devastating for the dominant “gender-affirming” model with its promotion of puberty blockers, hormones and surgery. The child was living with his mother and attending an unnamed gender clinic at a hospital; puberty blockers were on the cards. His father, separated, opposed this, and the judge decided the father should have sole responsibility. Along the way, Justice Strum punctured the absurd claim by Australian health authorities that England’s Cass review and its more holistic, less medicalised approach have nothing to teach our gender clinics. The judge found that the gender clinic failed to carry out the comprehensive assessment that is part of its marketing, an assessment that might have found ADHD or autism, not gender dysphoria, as needing treatment. Instead, the judge accepted evidence that the gender clinic has an ideological commitment to the medicalised gender-affirming model. He said: “No alternative treatment options are offered by the [gender clinic] for gender dysphoria diagnosed there, other than prescription of puberty blockers by a pediatrician.” Dr N, whose diagnosis of the child was in dispute, “could not identify a single case of a child who had been referred by her, or one of her colleagues, to a pediatrician at the [gender clinic] who had not been prescribed puberty blockers”. A doctor identified as Associate Professor L told the court that the treatment guidelines represented “best practice”. The judge found that Professor L’s dismissal of the Cass review was “misleading” and that the expert’s self-description as “an advocate for trans rights” was at odds with their duty of objectivity as an expert witness.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>51073
Judgment defines the debate and slams the dogma on puberty blockers, hormones and surgery
Justice Strum’s decision is the best-yet judicial guide to the debate about youth gender clinics.
BERNARD LANE - April 10, 2025
Family Court Justice Andrew Strum is careful to state that his 58,000-word decision is about the best interests of a 12-year-old boy and not about transgender rights.
Even so, his decision is the best-yet judicial guide to the debate about youth gender clinics. And it is devastating for the dominant “gender-affirming” model with its promotion of puberty blockers, hormones and surgery.
The child was living with his mother and attending an unnamed gender clinic at a hospital; puberty blockers were on the cards.
His father, separated, opposed this, and the judge decided the father should have sole responsibility.
Along the way, Justice Strum punctured the absurd claim by Australian health authorities that England’s Cass review and its more holistic, less medicalised approach have nothing to teach our gender clinics.
The judge found that the gender clinic failed to carry out the comprehensive assessment that is part of its marketing, an assessment that might have found ADHD or autism, not gender dysphoria, as needing treatment.
Instead, the judge accepted evidence that the gender clinic has an ideological commitment to the medicalised gender-affirming model. He said: “No alternative treatment options are offered by the [gender clinic] for gender dysphoria diagnosed there, other than prescription of puberty blockers by a pediatrician.”
Dr N, whose diagnosis of the child was in dispute, “could not identify a single case of a child who had been referred by her, or one of her colleagues, to a pediatrician at the [gender clinic] who had not been prescribed puberty blockers”.
A doctor identified as Associate Professor L told the court that the treatment guidelines represented “best practice”.
The judge found that Professor L’s dismissal of the Cass review was “misleading” and that the expert’s self-description as “an advocate for trans rights” was at odds with their duty of objectivity as an expert witness.
Professor L repeated a US activist trope whereby Dr Cass’s review is placed in an “anti-trans” tradition going back to a claim that Nazis burned “trans health” books and “murdered thousands of LGBTIQ people in the Holocaust”. The judge said this “demonstrates ignorance of the true evils of Nazism and cheapens the sufferings – and mass murder – of the millions of the victims thereof, which included, but were most certainly not limited to, transgender people, as well as gay and lesbian people, amongst other groups of people. I consider there to be no comparison whatsoever.”
Back to the case before him, the judge gave weight to the Cass review and the once obvious fact that children develop and change, thereby rejecting the gender clinic dogma that at his young age the child “has an actual, fixed gender identity yet, as opposed to being gender fluid or gender exploratory”.
And even if the child did have dysphoria, the judge would not have approved puberty blockers. He noted the profound risks, uncertainties and lack of long-term data. “I do not accept that the child, at this age and pre-pubertal stage in life, can properly understand the implications and potential risks of puberty blockers,” he found.
“The risks posed by medical (and surgical) gender affirming treatment include risks to fertility, sexual function, bone health, brain development, cardiovascular function and carcinogenesis, as well as the risks of being a lifelong medical patient and of later regret.”
He was surprised that, in defiance of the unknowns, “the [gender clinic] continues to represent to parents and children that puberty blockers are fully reversible and relatively risk-free”. And he observed that the hospital “has only recently employed a PhD candidate to study possible effects despite blocking children’s puberty for several years”.
Bernard Lane, a former journalist with The Australian, writes Gender Clinic News.
https://www.theaustralian.com.au/health/mental-health/judgment-defines-the-debate-and-slams-the-dogma-on-puberty-blockers-hormones-and-surgery/news-story/ee85f0c39111d15bd6fee0a4eb52d929
https://www.genderclinicnews.com/
https://qresear.ch/?q=Bernard+Lane
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.51075
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22927665 (180903ZAPR25) Notable: COMMENTARY: Is this the beginning of the end for puberty blockers? - "The notion that puberty blockers were both safe and fully reversible has now been called into question. Safe? Yes, except for significant impacts upon bone density, and concerns that they interrupt a crucial developmental stage in adolescent cognitive development. About 95-98 per cent of children on puberty blockers go on to take cross-sex hormones. So it would seem that they operate as a platform to get on to a trans train that hurtles inexorably to its destination - irreversible transformation of the body that some will later regret. A boy commenced early on puberty blockers who goes on to take oestrogen may never obtain adult sexual function and capacity for pleasure. Furthermore, systematic reviews of the evidence conducted in several countries have all reached the same conclusion - the evidence of mental health benefits from these treatments is very weak, and some studies show no such benefits at all. Re Devin, the decision of Justice Strum of the Federal Circuit and Family Court this week, is a further hammer blow. It must be emphasised that this is a judgment about one 12-year-old boy. It is not necessarily a precedent. Judges are not qualified to resolve great medical controversies. However, they have to be aware of the medical evidence to make decisions about individual children. Strum rejected the diagnosis of the gender clinic that the boy was suffering from gender dysphoria. The judgment is carefully and powerfully reasoned. Strum is withering in his criticisms of the hospital’s expert witnesses, especially “Assoc. Prof. L”, who argued that the landmark Cass Report, which has led to an almost complete ban on the use of puberty blockers for gender dysphoria in England, forms part of a “third wave of transgender oppression” commencing with the Nazis. Strum also rejected the very foundations of “gender-affirming care”, expressing concern about the gender clinic’s apparent policy “to affirm unreservedly those who present with concerns regarding their gender, brooking no questioning thereof” - even if it is a young child. He also rejected the notion that gender identity is innate and immutable. Is this the beginning of the end in Australia for the experiment of using puberty blockers for gender-incongruent children? The gender clinics and clinicians in private practice are fighting hard, with powerful political support from LGBTQ+ advocacy organisations. The professional medical colleges have been reluctant to take a stand; but if no one else will act, the courts will." - Patrick Parkinson, emeritus professor of law at the University of Queensland and formerly chair of the Family Law Council - theaustralian.com.au
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>51073
>>51074
COMMENTARY: Is this the beginning of the end for puberty blockers?
Patrick Parkinson - April 11, 2025
1/2
It began as a compassionate solution to the difficulties that trans people had in being accepted as the sex with which they identify.
A Dutch doctor came up with a solution to block puberty, so a male’s voice would not drop, nor would he develop male facial hair. A few years later, after high quantities of synthetic oestrogen (which would have to be maintained for the rest of his life) and his appearance would feminise. Puberty blockers could work for girls too, preventing them from developing breasts. Puberty had to be blocked early, before normal pubertal development began to be obvious. That might mean commencing blockade in a girl as young as 11.
Puberty blockers were known to be safe and fully reversible in children who experience very early onset of puberty. For gender-dysphoric children, they were promoted as giving kids time to think about whether to go on to take cross-sex hormones and have surgeries. Initially, the Family Court took a cautious approach, insisting on court approval as a safeguard. However, in re Kelvin (2017), it decided it didn’t need to be involved at all, if both parents agreed to the treatment.
Since then, the movement to normalise the treatment of gender-dysphoric children and adolescents with life-changing drugs has unravelled. It always had one major flaw. For decades, most children seen at specialist gender clinics in Amsterdam, Toronto and elsewhere had resolved their gender issues before, or while going through, puberty, usually growing up to be gay or lesbian.
Could blocking puberty actually prevent the very natural processes that would help these children resolve their gender issues?
The notion that puberty blockers were both safe and fully reversible has now been called into question. Safe? Yes, except for significant impacts upon bone density, and concerns that they interrupt a crucial developmental stage in adolescent cognitive development.
About 95-98 per cent of children on puberty blockers go on to take cross-sex hormones. So it would seem that they operate as a platform to get on to a trans train that hurtles inexorably to its destination – irreversible transformation of the body that some will later regret. A boy commenced early on puberty blockers who goes on to take oestrogen may never obtain adult sexual function and capacity for pleasure.
Furthermore, systematic reviews of the evidence conducted in several countries have all reached the same conclusion – the evidence of mental health benefits from these treatments is very weak, and some studies show no such benefits at all.
Re Devin, the decision of Justice Strum of the Federal Circuit and Family Court this week, is a further hammer blow. It must be emphasised that this is a judgment about one 12-year-old boy. It is not necessarily a precedent. Judges are not qualified to resolve great medical controversies. However, they have to be aware of the medical evidence to make decisions about individual children. Strum rejected the diagnosis of the gender clinic that the boy was suffering from gender dysphoria.
He was highly critical of its failure to conduct proper clinical assessments even though its clinical staff had been seeing the boy since he was six. Strum refused to authorise the boy to receive puberty blockers or cross-sex hormones and banned either parent from taking the child back to the gender clinic unless they both agreed. He removed the child from living with his mother. The boy will live from now on with the father.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.51076
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22927742 (181006ZAPR25) Notable: Video: UK court rules a woman is ‘a biological female’ - In a dramatic legal judgment, the British Supreme Court has ruled that a woman is “a biological female”. The court has ruled that, legally, men with gender certificates saying they are a woman - in some cases self-proclaimed without any medical authority – are not women. Women’s groups across Britain immediate hailed the “commonsense” ruling. Sex Matters said: “The court has given the right answer: the protected characteristic of sex - male and female – refers to reality, not paperwork.” For Women Scotland, the campaigning group that took the case through the courts for the past seven years, said it was “absolutely jubilant”. In a statement, the group said: “This is a landmark victory, not just for For Women Scotland, but for every woman who has been told to sit down, shut up, and make way. It puts a clear boundary around what it means to be female in law and pushes back against a men’s rights movement that has tried to colonise womanhood.” Supreme Court president Lord Patrick Hodge, who led a five-judge appeal on the issue, said on Wednesday: “The unanimous decision of this court is that the definition of the terms woman and sex in the Equality Act 2010 refer to a biological woman and biological sex.” He said transgender people still had protection against discrimination and harassment under the Equality Act. He said: “We counsel against reading this judgment as a triumph of one or more groups in our society at the expense of another. It is not. “The Equality Act 2010 gives transgender people protection not only against discrimination through the protected characteristic of gender reassignment, but also against direct discrimination, indirect discrimination and harassment in their acquired gender.” The landmark ruling is a huge setback for the Scottish government, which characterised women as anyone who thought they were women, as well as those who held a gender reassignment certificate - referred to in the court as “certifiable sex”.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>51073
UK court rules a woman is ‘a biological female’
JACQUELIN MAGNAY - April 16, 2025
1/2
In a dramatic legal judgment, the British Supreme Court has ruled that a woman is “a biological female”.
The court has ruled that, legally, men with gender certificates saying they are a woman – in some cases self-proclaimed without any medical authority – are not women.
Women’s groups across Britain immediate hailed the “commonsense” ruling.
Sex Matters said: “The court has given the right answer: the protected characteristic of sex – male and female – refers to reality, not paperwork.”
For Women Scotland, the campaigning group that took the case through the courts for the past seven years, said it was “absolutely jubilant”.
In a statement, the group said: “This is a landmark victory, not just for For Women Scotland, but for every woman who has been told to sit down, shut up, and make way. It puts a clear boundary around what it means to be female in law and pushes back against a men’s rights movement that has tried to colonise womanhood.”
Supreme Court president Lord Patrick Hodge, who led a five-judge appeal on the issue, said on Wednesday: “The unanimous decision of this court is that the definition of the terms woman and sex in the Equality Act 2010 refer to a biological woman and biological sex.”
He said transgender people still had protection against discrimination and harassment under the Equality Act.
He said: “We counsel against reading this judgment as a triumph of one or more groups in our society at the expense of another. It is not.
“The Equality Act 2010 gives transgender people protection not only against discrimination through the protected characteristic of gender reassignment, but also against direct discrimination, indirect discrimination and harassment in their acquired gender.”
The landmark ruling is a huge setback for the Scottish government, which characterised women as anyone who thought they were women, as well as those who held a gender reassignment certificate – referred to in the court as “certifiable sex”.
The Scottish government had wanted to categorise biological men who said they were women as being a female under the requirement to have 50 per cent of women on government boards.
The historic judgment opens the way for females to have protected spaces such as change rooms, sporting competitions and single-sex medical wards, and legally disallows men who claim to be women from entering women’s spaces. It also impacts on equal pay claims and maternity policies.
Broadly, the ruling means “sex” refers to biological sex – the XX (female) and XY (male) chromosomes people are born with – and is not “certificated sex”, referring to the gender people feel they are.
In its court submission, For Women Scotland director Trina Budge said: “Not tying the definition of sex to its ordinary meaning means that public boards could conceivably comprise of 50 per cent men, and 50 per cent men with certificates, yet still lawfully meet the targets for female representation.
“However, the ramifications … are much more far-reaching … The stakes are high and the court’s decision will have consequences for everyday, single-sex services such as toilets and hospital wards.”
The appeal judges said that interpreting sex as “certificated sex” would cut across the definitions of man and woman in the Equality Act and would instead create an “incoherent” interpretation of the act.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.51077
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22927877 (181125ZAPR25) Notable: Video: Peter Cotton tried to raise the alarm about an abusive priest - he's worried the church hasn't learnt from it - Peter Cotton was in his first weeks at a Catholic boarding school in Perth in the 1960s when he was sexually abused by his class teacher. That teacher was then-Christian Brother Daniel McMahon. Later, in 2002, Mr Cotton found out McMahon had moved to Tasmania in the 1990s to become a priest, and he was compelled to act. Mr Cotton made a complaint about McMahon to the Archdiocese of Hobart, hoping he would be removed as a priest. "I had a 12-year-old son at the time and that's what triggered me - action needed to be taken," he said. "I'd sat on this McMahon information for decades at that stage, and I had good reason to act … and pursue a complaint to its end, which I hoped would be McMahon being defrocked." But McMahon remained a priest until the day he died in 2012. A former journalist, Mr Cotton used his research and interviewing skills to write a manuscript about his own experiences and those of other victim-survivors who he contacted. He also interviewed church figures and McMahon himself. For Mr Cotton, it was never about getting a book published, but about putting all the information together so it could be shared with others. He said letters he acquired indicated "how complicit the Archdiocese of Hobart was in maintaining McMahon as a priest within their archdiocese". "The Archdiocese of Hobart claimed [to me that McMahon] was put out to pasture 18 months after my complaint. Letters I acquired as part of the writing of the book indicated that was anything but the truth," Mr Cotton said.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Peter Cotton tried to raise the alarm about an abusive priest — he's worried the church hasn't learnt from it
Loretta Lohberger - 6 Apr 2025
1/2
Peter Cotton was in his first weeks at a Catholic boarding school in Perth in the 1960s when he was sexually abused by his class teacher.
That teacher was then-Christian Brother Daniel McMahon.
WARNING: This story deals with trauma and child sexual abuse.
Later, in 2002, Mr Cotton found out McMahon had moved to Tasmania in the 1990s to become a priest, and he was compelled to act.
Mr Cotton made a complaint about McMahon to the Archdiocese of Hobart, hoping he would be removed as a priest.
"I had a 12-year-old son at the time and that's what triggered me — action needed to be taken," he said.
"I'd sat on this McMahon information for decades at that stage, and I had good reason to act … and pursue a complaint to its end, which I hoped would be McMahon being defrocked."
But McMahon remained a priest until the day he died in 2012.
Letters reveal archdiocese discussing McMahon
A former journalist, Mr Cotton used his research and interviewing skills to write a manuscript about his own experiences and those of other victim-survivors who he contacted.
He also interviewed church figures and McMahon himself.
For Mr Cotton, it was never about getting a book published, but about putting all the information together so it could be shared with others.
He said letters he acquired indicated "how complicit the Archdiocese of Hobart was in maintaining McMahon as a priest within their archdiocese".
"The Archdiocese of Hobart claimed [to me that McMahon] was put out to pasture 18 months after my complaint.
"Letters I acquired as part of the writing of the book indicated that was anything but the truth," Mr Cotton said.
In a letter from then-Christian Brothers province leader Kevin Ryan to Archbishop Adrian Doyle dated November 6, 2006, Brother Ryan wrote:
"We believe you would be making a very wise decision if you fully withdraw Fr Daniel [McMahon] from ministry."
Brother Ryan then offered to meet with McMahon, Archbishop Doyle and the then-vicar-general to discuss the allegations.
Ahead of the December 19, 2006 meeting, Archbishop Doyle wrote to Brother Ryan that the meeting "would be very valuable".
"It would also assist in conveying the decision that his public priestly ministry come to an end".
At some point after Mr Cotton's complaint was received, McMahon was removed from the role of parish priest — someone who is responsible for a particular location and celebrates mass in that parish regularly.
But he was never stopped from practising as a priest altogether.
He became a relief priest, filling in when other priests were on holidays or ill.
"That continued pretty much through the years until his death in 2012. Parishioners were not informed as to his history," Mr Cotton said.
"To let him into parishes in they way they did was mind-bogglingly bad and stupid practice."
Allegations from the 1950-1990s
McMahon was moved around various Christian Brothers schools in Western Australia and South Australia before he returned to his home state of Tasmania to become a priest.
Lawyer Judy Courtin's firm represents 10 McMahon victim-survivors.
"McMahon was raping and sexually assaulting children over a period of 35 to 40 years. He started in Tasmania in the 50s, when he was still training to be a Christian Brother," Dr Courtin said.
"He was still raping and sexually assaulting children in the 90s when he returned to Tasmania."
She said he was moved every one to two years while he was a Christian Brother.
Dr Courtin estimated there could be 200 or more victims of McMahon, "because we know that only about 5 per cent of boys who are sexually assaulted by Catholic clergy will ever report to the police".
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.51078
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22932371 (191440ZAPR25) Notable: Video: Oscar Jenkins faces up to 15 years in jail for defending Ukraine - Melbourne man Oscar Jenkins is facing up to 15 years in a Russian jail after being criminally charged for fighting in defence of Ukraine against Vladimir Putin’s invasion. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said the government would use whatever means possible to advocate for Jenkins, who was feared dead earlier this year before being revealed to be alive and in Russian captivity. The Prosecutor’s Office for the occupied territory of Lugansk said it had “approved the indictment in the criminal case against 33-year-old Australian Commonwealth citizen Oscar Charles Augustus Jenkins”, accusing him of being a “mercenary in an armed conflict”. The office also shared a new photograph of Jenkins, dressed in a blue and yellow coat and holding a book. Russian media outlets claimed that the former school teacher was paid a salary of around $11,000 to $15,000 per month to fight against the Russian army from March 2024 until he was captured last December. He could face a prison sentence of up to 15 years, the outlets reported. “We’ll continue to make representations to the reprehensible regime of Vladimir Putin on behalf of Mr Jenkins,” Albanese said on Saturday. “We will stand up and use whatever avenues we have at our disposal to continue to make those representations.” Albanese continued: “The people of Ukraine are fighting for a democratic nation, for their own sovereignty, but they’re also fighting for the international rule of law, which is why we do want to see peace, but we do want to see it on the terms that are acceptable to Ukraine.”
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>>/qresearch/22599384 (pb)
>>>/qresearch/22611088 (pb)
Oscar Jenkins faces up to 15 years in jail for defending Ukraine
Matthew Knott - April 19, 2025
Melbourne man Oscar Jenkins is facing up to 15 years in a Russian jail after being criminally charged for fighting in defence of Ukraine against Vladimir Putin’s invasion.
Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said the government would use whatever means possible to advocate for Jenkins, who was feared dead earlier this year before being revealed to be alive and in Russian captivity.
The Prosecutor’s Office for the occupied territory of Lugansk said it had “approved the indictment in the criminal case against 33-year-old Australian Commonwealth citizen Oscar Charles Augustus Jenkins”, accusing him of being a “mercenary in an armed conflict”.
The office also shared a new photograph of Jenkins, dressed in a blue and yellow coat and holding a book.
Russian media outlets claimed that the former school teacher was paid a salary of around $11,000 to $15,000 per month to fight against the Russian army from March 2024 until he was captured last December. He could face a prison sentence of up to 15 years, the outlets reported.
“We’ll continue to make representations to the reprehensible regime of Vladimir Putin on behalf of Mr Jenkins,” Albanese said on Saturday. “We will stand up and use whatever avenues we have at our disposal to continue to make those representations.”
Albanese continued: “The people of Ukraine are fighting for a democratic nation, for their own sovereignty, but they’re also fighting for the international rule of law, which is why we do want to see peace, but we do want to see it on the terms that are acceptable to Ukraine.”
Foreign Minister Penny Wong has previously called on Russia to release Jenkins from captivity, warning that Australia’s response would be “unequivocal” if he did not receive the protections he is entitled to under international humanitarian law.
Jenkins’ plight first came to light when footage began circulating online on December 22, showing him in Russian captivity, with his hands tied, being paraded before a camera by Russian soldiers.
He was seen being slapped across the face and questioned.
In the video, Jenkins, speaking in English and broken Ukrainian, explained he had been fighting in the Donbas region to help Ukraine.
In a later video, which circulated in February, a frail-looking Jenkins told his Russian interrogators that he felt a “bit weak”.
“I’ve lost a lot of weight, I have a broken arm still I think, and my hand is not good,” he said.
Jenkins attended Melbourne Grammar School, studied biomedical sciences at Monash University and had been working as a lecturer at a Tianjin college in China.
His friends from Melbourne have described him as quiet, thoughtful and talented with an adventurous streak. But Jenkins posted online last year that he had lost touch with many of his friends as he travelled the world.
Wong said in January that the government held “grave concerns for Mr Jenkins’ welfare” and was “making urgent inquiries following the reports of his death”, but Russian authorities later said he was being held alive.
Russia’s ambassador to Australia Alexey Pavlovsky, who had served in the role since 2019, has left the country after completing his posting and has not been replaced.
https://www.theage.com.au/politics/federal/australia-advocating-for-melbourne-man-charged-with-fighting-for-ukraine-20250419-p5lswe.html
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xo1B4hzUzmQ
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.51079
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22932458 (191509ZAPR25) Notable: Australian Oscar Jenkins charged by Russian authorities - Russian authorities have charged captured Australian man Oscar Jenkins under the criminal code of participating as a “mercenary in an armed conflict”. A statement from the Prosecutor’s Office of the Luhansk People’s Republic confirmed the criminal charges against the 33-year-old, who was captured by Russian forces in Ukraine in December 2024. NewsWire understands he was fighting as part of the 402nd Rifle Battalion in Ukraine’s 66th Mechanised Brigade when he was captured near Makiivka, a tiny village on the Zherebets River in Luhansk Oblast. According to the indictment, Mr Jenkins arrived in Ukraine in February 2024 and participated in the conflict between March and December that year, where he is alleged to have received a “monthly reward” of $11,400 and $15,000 per month. “While at the Ternopil recruiting centre, he signed a contract with the Ukrainian Defense Ministry, after which he received a military uniform, equipment, weapons and ammunition for it and was sent to serve in the village of Shchurovo, Kramatorsk district, Donetsk People’s Republic,” the statement read. When questioned about the captured Australian on Saturday, Anthony Albanese said he had “certainly not” forgotten about him. “We will continue to make representations to the reprehensible regime of Vladimir Putin on behalf of Mr Jenkins,” he told reporters on Saturday. “We will stand up and use whatever avenues we have at our disposal.”
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>51078
Australian Oscar Jenkins charged by Russian authorities
ALEXANDRA FEIAM - 19 April 2025
Russian authorities have charged captured Australian man Oscar Jenkins under the criminal code of participating as a “mercenary in an armed conflict”.
A statement from the Prosecutor’s Office of the Luhansk People’s Republic confirmed the criminal charges against the 33-year-old, who was captured by Russian forces in Ukraine in December 2024.
NewsWire understands he was fighting as part of the 402nd Rifle Battalion in Ukraine’s 66th Mechanised Brigade when he was captured near Makiivka, a tiny village on the Zherebets River in Luhansk Oblast.
According to the indictment, Mr Jenkins arrived in Ukraine in February 2024 and participated in the conflict between March and December that year, where he is alleged to have received a “monthly reward” of $11,400 and $15,000 per month.
“While at the Ternopil recruiting centre, he signed a contract with the Ukrainian Defense Ministry, after which he received a military uniform, equipment, weapons and ammunition for it and was sent to serve in the village of Shchurovo, Kramatorsk district, Donetsk People’s Republic,” the statement read.
When questioned about the captured Australian on Saturday, Anthony Albanese said he had “certainly not” forgotten about him.
“We will continue to make representations to the reprehensible regime of Vladimir Putin on behalf of Mr Jenkins,” he told reporters on Saturday.
“We will stand up and use whatever avenues we have at our disposal.”
The Prime Minister labelled Russia as a “reprehensible regime” and reiterated his position that he is prepared to consider Australia’s involvement in a peace keeping force.
“The Russian war against the people of Ukraine is a war against international law. It’s against national sovereignty,” he said.
“The people of Ukraine are fighting for a democratic nation, for their own sovereignty but they’re also fighting for the international rule of law.”
A Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade spokesman told NewsWire they continued to advocate for Mr Jenkins’ release.
“We continue to hold serious concerns for Mr Jenkins and are working with Ukraine and other partners to advocate for his welfare and release,” they said.
Foreigners travelling to fight in Ukraine have been considered “mercenaries” by Russian authorities, which means they can then be criminally charged, unlike a “prisoner of war”, who would have protections and rights under the Geneva Convention.
Last month, British citizen James Scott Rhys Anderson was sentenced to 19 years in prison on charges of “mercenary activities” and terrorism after being captured by Russian forces in November 2024 while fighting for Ukraine.
The 33-year-old is understood to have been fighting as part of the International Legion of Defence of Ukraine, a coalition comprised of former soldiers and foreign volunteers.
The Melbourne Grammar School teacher had no prior military background.
According to Mr Jenkins’ LinkedIn, from 2015 he worked as a language teacher in China before becoming a lecturer at the Tianjin Modern Vocational Technology College.
Footage of the captured man circulated on pro-Russian social media, showing Mr Jenkins with his hands tied while soldiers ask for his name and where he came from.
“Oscar Jenkins, 32 years old” he said in broken Ukrainian to the soldiers.
He explained he was a teacher who lived in “Australia and Ukraine”, and was asked what he was doing there.
“I’m a soldier,” he said, before being slapped on the head.
https://www.theaustralian.com.au/breaking-news/australian-oscar-jenkins-charged-by-russian-authorities/news-story/c87488954fb12ab704779b19d494e5b6
https://donetskmedia.ru/20250418-avstralijskogo-naemnika-osudjat-v-luganske.media
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.51080
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22936425 (210058ZAPR25) Notable: How Australia celebrated Easter with prayer, sport, chocolate and family time - Here’s a shoutout to all those people who didn’t get a break this Easter and won’t be taking annual leave to roll their days off into the Anzac Day long weekend. We’re indebted to our police, ambos, hospital workers, garbos and footy players. Not so much to the federal election try-hards who kept at it when most of us were doing our level best to switch off from the voting that kicks off at pre-polling stations on Tuesday. At least Anthony Albanese and Peter Dutton read the room. Easter 2025 was a time for prayer or chocolate eggs, the beach and family, kiting or kicking back, when the nation took the opportunity to relax and give thanks before the winter weather closes in. It was not a time for bareknuckled political campaigning, which the Prime Minister and his opposite number wisely dialled down. Mr Albanese spent Easter Sunday morning at mass and praising his other creed, the South Sydney Rabbitohs. He took Holy Communion at St Mary’s Cathedral, where he was once an altar boy, before confessing to Andrew Johns and the blokes on the Footy Show at Nine that he had had limited prospects as a “skinny kid” playing rugby league. The Opposition Leader also played it low key, turning sausages in an Ipswich park in the Queensland seat of Blair, high on the blue team’s must-win list. Mr Dutton was flanked by his wife, Kirrily, and their six-year-old spoodle Ralph, as well as LNP candidate Carl Mutzelburg. Delivering a brief Easter message to the waiting cameras, Mr Dutton kept the gloves firmly in place. “We live in the best country in the world,” he said. “And it’s on these public holidays that we come together and play a bit of sport or eat and drink together.”
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50833
How Australia celebrated Easter with prayer, sport, chocolate and family time
JAMIE WALKER - 20 April 2025
1/2
Here’s a shoutout to all those people who didn’t get a break this Easter and won’t be taking annual leave to roll their days off into the Anzac Day long weekend.
We’re indebted to our police, ambos, hospital workers, garbos and footy players. Not so much to the federal election try-hards who kept at it when most of us were doing our level best to switch off from the voting that kicks off at pre-polling stations on Tuesday.
At least Anthony Albanese and Peter Dutton read the room.
Easter 2025 was a time for prayer or chocolate eggs, the beach and family, kiting or kicking back, when the nation took the opportunity to relax and give thanks before the winter weather closes in.
It was not a time for bareknuckled political campaigning, which the Prime Minister and his opposite number wisely dialled down.
Mr Albanese spent Easter Sunday morning at mass and praising his other creed, the South Sydney Rabbitohs. He took Holy Communion at St Mary’s Cathedral, where he was once an altar boy, before confessing to Andrew Johns and the blokes on the Footy Show at Nine that he had had limited prospects as a “skinny kid” playing rugby league.
“Well, I wasn’t good enough to make it to your … level so I stopped at about under-16,” the PM joked. “But I loved it.”
He and fiancee Jodie Haydon went on to lunch with Greek Orthodox Archbishop Makarios Griniezakis and other members of that community in Sydney, in a nod to the matchup of Easter in the Christian and Orthodox calendars this year.
The Opposition Leader also played it low key, turning sausages in an Ipswich park in the Queensland seat of Blair, high on the blue team’s must-win list. Mr Dutton was flanked by his wife, Kirrily, and their six-year-old spoodle Ralph, as well as LNP candidate Carl Mutzelburg.
Delivering a brief Easter message to the waiting cameras, Mr Dutton kept the gloves firmly in place. “We live in the best country in the world,” he said. “And it’s on these public holidays that we come together and play a bit of sport or eat and drink together.”
Elsewhere, though, the campaign went on. Appearing on the ABC’s Insiders program, Greens leader Adam Bandt tied himself in verbal knots to avoid repeating a claim that the Israeli military was committing genocide in Gaza. And opposition housing spokesman Michael Sukkar did no better trying to explain why his investment properties weren’t negatively geared.
Churches were busy for Christians’ most joyous day of the year, celebrating the resurrection of Christ following sombre commemorations of the crucifixion on Good Friday. In his Easter pastoral letter, Australia’s newest Catholic cardinal, Mykola Bychok, urged the faithful to keep his war-ravaged homeland of Ukraine in their prayers.
“The war continues to bring devastation, pain and heartbreak,” he said. “Yet even here, in the shadow of the cross, we cling to the promise of the empty tomb.
“We live in hope that this unjust aggression will be brought to an end and that a lasting peace will be established.”
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.51081
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22938708 (220914ZAPR25) Notable: Pope Francis, the head of the Catholic Church, dies aged 88 - Pope Francis, the reforming head of the Catholic Church who sought to modernise the pastoral and public priorities of the Vatican, has died at the age of 88. The Vatican announced the death of the Argentina-born Francis, a ground-breaking and progressive figure on Monday. He was the first pope to be born or raised outside Europe in 12 centuries, the first from the Americas and the first Jesuit to hold the role. Francis, who had led the world’s 1.3 billion Roman Catholics since 2013, had been in increasingly poor health and physical pain, using a wheelchair or cane for more than a year after undergoing several operations, including major stomach surgery. The Vatican announced on February 18 that he had developed pneumonia in both lungs and his condition remained “complex”. At the time, he had been suffering from a respiratory infection for more than a week and was admitted to Rome’s Gemelli hospital on February 14. Francis’ death will spark an official nine-day mourning period and weeks of intrigue as to who will succeed him in the role, with more than 140 cardinals to arrive at the Vatican within 15 to 20 days to begin the papal conclave, a secretive election process held to determine a successor.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Pope Francis, the head of the Catholic Church, dies aged 88
Rob Harris - April 21, 2025
1/2
London: Pope Francis, the reforming head of the Catholic Church who sought to modernise the pastoral and public priorities of the Vatican, has died at the age of 88.
The Vatican announced the death of the Argentina-born Francis, a ground-breaking and progressive figure on Monday.
He was the first pope to be born or raised outside Europe in 12 centuries, the first from the Americas and the first Jesuit to hold the role.
Francis, who had led the world’s 1.3 billion Roman Catholics since 2013, had been in increasingly poor health and physical pain, using a wheelchair or cane for more than a year after undergoing several operations, including major stomach surgery.
The Vatican announced on February 18 that he had developed pneumonia in both lungs and his condition remained “complex”. At the time, he had been suffering from a respiratory infection for more than a week and was admitted to Rome’s Gemelli hospital on February 14.
In line with centuries-old church protocols, his death was first verified by the camerlengo – the Vatican’s overseer of property and revenues – who ceremonially called out the pope’s baptismal name, Jorge Mario Bergoglio, three times. Upon receiving no response, he pronounced the pope dead and informed church staff and the public.
Francis’ death will spark an official nine-day mourning period and weeks of intrigue as to who will succeed him in the role, with more than 140 cardinals to arrive at the Vatican within 15 to 20 days to begin the papal conclave, a secretive election process held to determine a successor.
His burial must take place between four and six days after his death, according to the Universi Dominici Gregis constitution that governs the papal transition, and the church will observe nine days of mourning during the papal interregnum.
While many popes are buried in the crypts beneath St Peter’s Basilica, Francis made it known in December 2023 that he wanted a vastly stripped-back funeral service and to be buried in Rome’s Basilica of Santa Maria. The funeral Mass is expected to be held in St Peter’s Square. The last pope to be buried outside the Vatican was Leo XIII, who died in 1903 and is buried in the Basilica of St John Lateran in Rome.
Cardinals will then lock themselves in the Sistine Chapel, disconnected from news media and telephones to block any outside influence, and undertake several rounds of voting until a candidate receives a two-thirds majority. The process could take days, if not weeks, before the result is announced when white smoke rises from the Sistine Chapel.
Born in Buenos Aires in 1936, Francis’ reign was controversial from the beginning when he was elected to the role following the shock resignation of former pope Benedict – the first pontiff to quit in 600 years. The pair formed a close bond in the almost 10 years that followed, when there were unusually two popes in the Vatican. Benedict died on the last day of 2022.
Francis, the 266th pontiff in the church’s 2000-year history, inherited the role at a time of great crisis and difficulty for the church, which had been battered by sexual abuse scandals, mired in financial mismanagement and polarised between conservatives and progressives.
Although he did not change doctrine, he was revolutionary in every other way by almost immediately attacking clericalism, seeking to empower the laity, promoting women to positions of power in the bureaucracy – although not ordaining them priests – and speaking out about climate change.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.51082
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22938713 (220918ZAPR25) Notable: Pope Francis, the head of the Catholic Church, dies aged 88 - Pope Francis, the reforming head of the Catholic Church who sought to modernise the pastoral and public priorities of the Vatican, has died at the age of 88. The Vatican announced the death of the Argentina-born Francis, a ground-breaking and progressive figure on Monday. He was the first pope to be born or raised outside Europe in 12 centuries, the first from the Americas and the first Jesuit to hold the role. Francis, who had led the world’s 1.3 billion Roman Catholics since 2013, had been in increasingly poor health and physical pain, using a wheelchair or cane for more than a year after undergoing several operations, including major stomach surgery. The Vatican announced on February 18 that he had developed pneumonia in both lungs and his condition remained “complex”. At the time, he had been suffering from a respiratory infection for more than a week and was admitted to Rome’s Gemelli hospital on February 14. Francis’ death will spark an official nine-day mourning period and weeks of intrigue as to who will succeed him in the role, with more than 140 cardinals to arrive at the Vatican within 15 to 20 days to begin the papal conclave, a secretive election process held to determine a successor.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50833
>>51081
Anthony Albanese Tweet
https://x.com/AlboMP/status/1914244326886195595
—
Peter Dutton Tweet
With God, may Pope Francis rest in peace.
https://x.com/PeterDutton_MP/status/1914234299131547800
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.51083
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22943038 (230958ZAPR25) Notable: Moscow comes mocking: Putin man Sergei Tolchenov’s wildcard warning to leaders on Indonesian defence ties - Moscow has warned Anthony Albanese and Peter Dutton to stay out of its way in the Indo-Pacific, invoking Donald Trump to declare Australia has “no cards” to play that could undermine Russia’s military co-operation with Indonesia. The prospect that Russia could operate military aircraft from Indonesia’s Biak Island continued to hang over Australia’s election campaign at the weekend, as Russia’s top diplomat in Jakarta warned Australia’s interests “cannot extend to the territory of neighbouring sovereign states that pursue active and independent policies”. A week after the original Janes report, Moscow’s ambassador in Jakarta, Sergei Tolchenov, accused Australia’s political leaders of trying to out-do each other by ramping up anti-Russian rhetoric ahead of the May 3 election. “It is clear that the leaders of the two main political parties, replacing each other in power and calling it democracy, are now trying to outdo each other, heating up the situation,” he said in a letter to the Jakarta Post. “They stop at nothing, and the time has come to play the so-called ‘Russian card’.” But he said Australia had no say over Russia’s “integral” military engagement with Indonesia, declaring: “You have no cards.” The statement was a reference to Mr Trump’s Oval Office meeting in February with Volodymyr Zelensky, when he said the Ukrainian President had “no cards” in peace talks with Russia.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50833
>>51065
>>51068
Moscow comes mocking: Putin man Sergei Tolchenov’s wildcard warning to leaders on Indonesian defence ties
BEN PACKHAM and DIAN SEPTIARI - 20 April 2025
1/2
Moscow has warned Anthony Albanese and Peter Dutton to stay out of its way in the Indo-Pacific, invoking Donald Trump to declare Australia has “no cards” to play that could undermine Russia’s military co-operation with Indonesia.
The prospect that Russia could operate military aircraft from Indonesia’s Biak Island continued to hang over Australia’s election campaign at the weekend, as Russia’s top diplomat in Jakarta warned Australia’s interests “cannot extend to the territory of neighbouring sovereign states that pursue active and independent policies”.
As the Opposition Leader prepares to announce his long-awaited defence policy in the lead up to Anzac Day this week, Labor sought to stamp out Coalition demands for greater transparency over the reported Russian request.
Minister Murray Watt said there was “no proposal” by Russia to have a base in Indonesia, despite the absence of a denial by Jakarta over a report to that effect by the Janes defence journal.
Opposition foreign affairs spokesman David Coleman demanded an urgent clarification, arguing Senator Watt’s comments were at odds with those of other senior Labor figures, who said Jakarta had not agreed to a Russian base, but did not dispute a request was made.
The ongoing row over Moscow’s ties with Jakarta comes amid an increasingly close relationship between Indonesia and China, as the nations’ foreign and defence ministers prepared for talks in Beijing on Monday.
China’s Foreign Ministry said the inaugural “2+2” dialogue would include discussion on “bilateral co-operation in political security and defence, and international and regional co-operation”.
A week after the original Janes report, Moscow’s ambassador in Jakarta, Sergei Tolchenov, accused Australia’s political leaders of trying to out-do each other by ramping up anti-Russian rhetoric ahead of the May 3 election.
“It is clear that the leaders of the two main political parties, replacing each other in power and calling it democracy, are now trying to outdo each other, heating up the situation,” he said in a letter to the Jakarta Post. “They stop at nothing, and the time has come to play the so-called ‘Russian card’.”
But he said Australia had no say over Russia’s “integral” military engagement with Indonesia, declaring: “You have no cards.”
The statement was a reference to Mr Trump’s Oval Office meeting in February with Volodymyr Zelensky, when he said the Ukrainian President had “no cards” in peace talks with Russia.
The Biak Island base, in Indonesia’s easternmost Papua province, would become a hive of Russian activity under an agreement with Moscow’s space agency to establish a joint satellite launch facility there.
The head of Indonesia’s National Research and Innovation Agency announced in December last year that the country was collaborating with Roscosmos Space Corporation and its launch subsidiary, Glavkosmos, to develop the commercial space facility on the island.
“We hope to move forward with this co-operation and complete the spaceport as soon as possible,” the agency’s chair, Laksana Tri Handoko, said at the time.
Roscosmos has close ties to Russia’s military, developing intercontinental and ballistic missiles, and launching spy satellites and anti-satellite weapons.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.51084
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22943060 (231014ZAPR25) Notable: Opinion: Why Malcolm Turnbull is wrong about AUKUS - "Former prime minister Malcolm Turnbull has called for an “urgent assessment of the state of the AUKUS submarine project.” So, where are we? Over the past three and a half years, a significant amount has been achieved. Of course, the endeavour is risky - like all national endeavours – but that doesn’t mean we should abandon a complex undertaking such as AUKUS. Instead, we need to manage and mitigate the risk. Since the announcement in September 2021 that Australia intended to acquire nuclear-powered submarines in partnership with the United Kingdom and the United States, the plan has received significant media attention, scepticism and criticism. In a healthy democracy, any sudden decision made without a competitive evaluation process will inevitably face scrutiny. Yet despite changes in government across all three nations since AUKUS was first announced, the initiative has retained bipartisan support, a point reinforced by the US Congress supporting it through the passing of the National Defence Authorisation Act in December 2023, including the sale of three Virginia-class submarines to Australia. It is imperative for Australia to make clear to the US just how vital submarines are to our national security, and to emphasise that the extensive support we provide, including access to Australia’s strategically important geography, is part of the deal. This is especially important given the more transactional nature of the current US administration and alliance framework. In response to Turnbull’s call for an “urgent assessment”, the answer is that Australia’s plan to acquire nuclear-powered submarines remains on track. Yes, it carries significant risks - as any major national endeavour does – but the challenges have been identified, and mitigation measures are in place. The progress made over the last three and a half years is substantial. Rather than repeatedly reassessing the program, we should concentrate our political and intellectual capital on ensuring it stays the course." - Jennifer Parker, Defence expert - afr.com
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50962
>>50771
>>51007
Opinion: Why Malcolm Turnbull is wrong about AUKUS
Rather than repeatedly reassessing the program, we should concentrate our political and intellectual capital on ensuring it stays the course.
Jennifer Parker, Defence expert - Apr 2, 2025
1/2
Former prime minister Malcolm Turnbull has called for an “urgent assessment of the state of the AUKUS submarine project.” So, where are we?
Over the past three and a half years, a significant amount has been achieved. Of course, the endeavour is risky – like all national endeavours – but that doesn’t mean we should abandon a complex undertaking such as AUKUS.
Instead, we need to manage and mitigate the risk.
Since the announcement in September 2021 that Australia intended to acquire nuclear-powered submarines in partnership with the United Kingdom and the United States, the plan has received significant media attention, scepticism and criticism.
In a healthy democracy, any sudden decision made without a competitive evaluation process will inevitably face scrutiny.
There are four major risks to the AUKUS national enterprise: the political will of all partners; delivery schedule; the cost of acquiring and sustaining the capability (including its impact on Australia’s broader Defence budget); and workforce challenges, both for uniformed personnel and within the submarine-building industry.
While these risks remain significant, the progress so far demonstrates a commitment to proactive mitigation. On the political front, the partnership demands considerable backing from the United Kingdom, the United States, and Australia amid global upheaval.
Yet despite changes in government across all three nations since AUKUS was first announced, the initiative has retained bipartisan support, a point reinforced by the US Congress supporting it through the passing of the National Defence Authorisation Act in December 2023, including the sale of three Virginia-class submarines to Australia.
The political will was further reinforced by the agreement of all three partners on the optimal pathway for Australia’s acquisition of nuclear-powered submarines within 18 months of its announcement and the signing of the trilateral AUKUS treaty in August last year, which came into effect in January.
Although the treaty was finalised before President Donald Trump’s election, the new US administration has since shown strong support, with Secretary of State Marco Rubio calling AUKUS “something that I think you’re going to find very strong support for in this administration” and a “blueprint” for co-operation.
The new US secretary of defence stated in February that “the president is very aware, supportive of AUKUS, recognises the importance of the defence industrial base”.
Regarding the cost risk, while it is undeniably substantial, it is not orders of magnitude higher than the ill-fated conventional Attack-class submarine project. Senate estimates from October 2021 put that project’s acquisition and sustainment costs at almost $235 billion through to 2080.
In last year’s budget, the Australian government allocated funding within the defence to cover the expected costs of acquiring nuclear-powered submarines over the next decade. While the overall defence budget remains a significant concern, this measure has been an important step in mitigating the cost risks of AUKUS.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.51085
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22947830 (241432ZAPR25) Notable: Video: ADF | Anzac Day preparation - On Anzac Day, we mark the landings in Gallipoli of Australian and New Zealand Army Corps (ANZAC) soldiers in 1915, and commemorate all Australian personnel who served and died in wars, conflicts and peacekeeping operations. We reflect on their courage, discipline and self-sacrifice. The Anzac spirit lives on in the hearts and minds of all Australians as we acknowledge the courage and sacrifice of those who contributed so much to shaping the identity of our nation. Australian Defence Force (ADF) personnel across Australia and serving around the world will commemorate Anzac Day through dawn services and commemorative services. In Australia, ADF personnel will support the Australian War Memorial services as well as services in each capital city and dozens of smaller cities and towns. Overseas, ADF personnel will also support services at Gallipoli in Türkiye, Villers-Bretonneux in France, as well as services in the Middle East and across the Indo-Pacific. - Defence Australia
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
ADF | Anzac Day preparation
Defence Australia
Apr 17, 2025
On Anzac Day, we mark the landings in Gallipoli of Australian and New Zealand Army Corps (ANZAC) soldiers in 1915, and commemorate all Australian personnel who served and died in wars, conflicts and peacekeeping operations. We reflect on their courage, discipline and self-sacrifice.
The Anzac spirit lives on in the hearts and minds of all Australians as we acknowledge the courage and sacrifice of those who contributed so much to shaping the identity of our nation.
Australian Defence Force (ADF) personnel across Australia and serving around the world will commemorate Anzac Day through dawn services and commemorative services. In Australia, ADF personnel will support the Australian War Memorial services as well as services in each capital city and dozens of smaller cities and towns.
Overseas, ADF personnel will also support services at Gallipoli in Türkiye, Villers-Bretonneux in France, as well as services in the Middle East and across the Indo-Pacific.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ra3nikdFRYo
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.51086
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22947852 (241435ZAPR25) Notable: Video: Final preparations underway on ANZAC Day 2025 eve - Final preparations are underway in Australia and Gallipoli for people to remember those who made the ultimate sacrifice this ANZAC Day. - 9 News Australia
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>51085
Final preparations underway on ANZAC Day 2025 eve
9 News Australia
Apr 24, 2025
Final preparations are underway in Australia and Gallipoli for people to remember those who made the ultimate sacrifice this ANZAC Day.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VQexzE06RFI
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.51087
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22947866 (241437ZAPR25) Notable: Video: LIVE: National Dawn Service | Anzac Day 2025 | OFFICIAL BROADCAST - Join us as we go LIVE for the Anzac Day 2025 National Commemorative Service in Canberra from 5.30am AEST on April 25. - ABC Australia
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>51085
LIVE: National Dawn Service | Anzac Day 2025 | OFFICIAL BROADCAST
ABC Australia
Apr 25, 2025
Join us as we go LIVE for the Anzac Day 2025 National Commemorative Service in Canberra from 5.30am AEST on April 25.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-bImZNDgAZ8
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.51088
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22947879 (241440ZAPR25) Notable: Video: LIVE: Gallipoli Dawn Service | Anzac Day 2025 | OFFICIAL BROADCAST - Join us as we go LIVE for the Anzac Day 2025 Gallipoli Dawn Service from 12:30pm AEST April 25. - ABC Australia
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>51085
LIVE: Gallipoli Dawn Service | Anzac Day 2025 | OFFICIAL BROADCAST
ABC Australia
Apr 25, 2025
Join us as we go LIVE for the Anzac Day 2025 Gallipoli Dawn Service from 12:30pm AEST April 25.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Unbn-aAIrmY
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.51089
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22947891 (241443ZAPR25) Notable: Video: Anzac Day 2025 Melbourne Dawn Service - Watch the live stream of the Dawn Service at the Shrine of Remembrance. In solemn tradition, Victorians gather to commemorate those who served and died in defence of our country. The service is held at dawn to coincide with the time of the Gallipoli landing in 1915 - the first major military action by Australian and New Zealand forces (ANZACs) during the First World War. The event includes recitations, hymns, wreath-laying and an address by the Governor of Victoria. - ShrineMelbourne
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>51085
Anzac Day 2025 Melbourne Dawn Service
ShrineMelbourne
Apr 25, 2025
Watch the live stream of the Dawn Service at the Shrine of Remembrance.
In solemn tradition, Victorians gather to commemorate those who served and died in defence of our country.
The service is held at dawn to coincide with the time of the Gallipoli landing in 1915—the first major military action by Australian and New Zealand forces (ANZACs) during the First World War.
The event includes recitations, hymns, wreath-laying and an address by the Governor of Victoria.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eYpoocTJ474
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.51090
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22947907 (241449ZAPR25) Notable: Video: Anzac Day 2025 Melbourne March & Commemoration Service - Watch the live stream of the Anzac Day March and Commemoration Service. Honour and recognise those who have served and who currently serve in defence of Australia and its interests. The march commences in Swanston Street (near Federation Square) along St Kilda Road to the Shrine of Remembrance. The march is normally complete by midday, and is followed by a commemoration service at the Shrine of Remembrance. - ShrineMelbourne
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>51085
Anzac Day 2025 Melbourne March & Commemoration Service
ShrineMelbourne
Apr 25, 2025
Watch the live stream of the Anzac Day March and Commemoration Service.
Honour and recognise those who have served and who currently serve in defence of Australia and its interests.
The march commences in Swanston Street (near Federation Square) along St Kilda Road to the Shrine of Remembrance.
The march is normally complete by midday, and is followed by a commemoration service at the Shrine of Remembrance.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VceXh3X1De0
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.51091
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22947920 (241452ZAPR25) Notable: Video: The Last Post - Anzac Day 2025 - "They shall grow not old, as we that are left grow old; Age shall not weary them, nor the years condemn. At the going down of the sun and in the morning We will remember them." Lest We Forget.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>51085
ANZAC Day 2025
They shall grow not old, as we that are left grow old;
Age shall not weary them, nor the years condemn.
At the going down of the sun and in the morning
We will remember them.
Lest We Forget.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.51092
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22951814 (251504ZAPR25) Notable: Video: Millions mark Anzac Day with dawn services and marches across Australia - Australians have gathered to mark Anzac Day and pay tribute to the men and women who have served in the nation's defence forces. The solemn day began with dawn services, held in small suburban parks, state capitals and the Australian War Memorial (AWM) in Canberra, commemorating the bravery and sacrifice of all who served in the armed forces. Today marks 110 years since Australian and New Zealand soldiers landed on the shores of Gallipoli, in Turkey, during World War I for the start of the bloody Dardanelles campaign. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese gave the dedication with a short speech at the dawn service at the AWM in Canberra. "At this hour upon the 25th of April in 1915 Anzac became one of the immortal names in history," the PM said. "We who are gathered here, think of those who went out to the battlefields of all wars, but did not return. "We feel them still near us in spirit. We wish to be worthy of their great sacrifice. Let us therefore once more dedicate ourselves to the ideals for which they died. "As the dawn is even now about to pierce the night, so let their memory inspire us to work for the coming new life into the dark places of the world."
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>51085
>>51091
Millions mark Anzac Day with dawn services and marches across Australia
Josh Hohne and Richard Wood - Apr 25, 2025
Australians have gathered to mark Anzac Day and pay tribute to the men and women who have served in the nation's defence forces.
The solemn day began with dawn services, held in small suburban parks, state capitals and the Australian War Memorial (AWM) in Canberra, commemorating the bravery and sacrifice of all who served in the armed forces.
Today marks 110 years since Australian and New Zealand soldiers landed on the shores of Gallipoli, in Turkey, during World War I for the start of the bloody Dardanelles campaign.
Prime Minister Anthony Albanese gave the dedication with a short speech at the dawn service at the AWM in Canberra.
"At this hour upon the 25th of April in 1915 Anzac became one of the immortal names in history," the PM said.
"We who are gathered here, think of those who went out to the battlefields of all wars, but did not return.
"We feel them still near us in spirit. We wish to be worthy of their great sacrifice. Let us therefore once more dedicate ourselves to the ideals for which they died.
"As the dawn is even now about to pierce the night, so let their memory inspire us to work for the coming new life into the dark places of the world."
A damp start to the day in Sydney and Brisbane failed to deter thousands of people attending dawn services in their cities.
Opposition Leader Peter Dutton was among those attending the Brisbane commemoration at the Shrine of Remembrance in Anzac Square.
But in Melbourne the solemn occasion was marred when agitators jeered and heckled the acknowledgement of country given at the start of the dawn service at the Shrine of Remembrance.
The group was escorted from the service by police and event officials.
Later in the morning, serving defence force members, their families and veterans took part in Anzac Day marches.
A flyover by Royal Australian Air Force jets marked the start of the march in Elizabeth Street, Sydney.
At Anzac Cove in Gallipoli, a dawn service will be held at the site of Australia's most famous action in World War I.
The rest of Anzac Day will be marked by more parades and wreath-laying events, followed by the usual long-weekend celebrations.
At Anzac Cove in Gallipoli, a dawn service will be held at the site of Australia's most famous action in World War I.
The Villers-Bretonneux dawn service will take place from the Australian National Memorial in France.
Millions of people will participate in the days' events, while the entire country enjoys the second long weekend in a row.
Pubs and RSL clubs around the nation will be packed to the rafters for a day out, and a chance to play some two-up.
The roads will be busy, some of the shops will be closed, and some states will have double demerit points in force for road offences.
https://www.9news.com.au/national/anzac-day-2025-australia-pauses-to-mark-anzac-day-2025/fc7b4378-93b9-4fb4-a7cd-c287af112001
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rfy_ZK4X-aM
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.51093
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22951863 (251514ZAPR25) Notable: Video: Bipartisan condemnation: Welcome to Country hecklers’ massive own goal - The far-right hecklers who disrupted the Welcome to Country ceremonies at Friday morning’s Anzac Day services in Melbourne and Perth were quickly condemned as fringe actors. But what they shouted - “We don’t need to be welcomed,” according to reports – has become a common refrain. It is repeated with rising frequency in conservative debates about Welcomes to Country on social media, in Sky News segments and even the Senate. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and Opposition Leader Peter Dutton sought to deny the agitators any impact on Friday. They roundly condemned the disruptions as disgraceful and disrespectful, and reminded Australians of the day’s intention to commemorate soldiers, including Indigenous veterans. Dutton went a step further. “Welcome to Country is an important part of official ceremonies and it should be respected, and I don’t agree with the booing,” he said. “We have a proud Indigenous heritage in this country, and we should be proud to celebrate it as part of today.” His move shut down any mainstream momentum the hecklers might have hoped to generate and reinforced a consensus in favour of Welcome to Country ceremonies, despite the Coalition’s prior concerns. In doing so, Dutton locked out the agitators and set their cause back. It was a powerful lesson on a sombre day.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>51085
>>51091
>>51092
>>51063
Bipartisan condemnation: Welcome to Country hecklers’ massive own goal
Natassia Chrysanthos - April 25, 2025
The far-right hecklers who disrupted the Welcome to Country ceremonies at Friday morning’s Anzac Day services in Melbourne and Perth were quickly condemned as fringe actors.
But what they shouted – “We don’t need to be welcomed,” according to reports – has become a common refrain. It is repeated with rising frequency in conservative debates about Welcomes to Country on social media, in Sky News segments and even the Senate.
The Coalition stoked this debate earlier this year, when it brought the phrase into mainstream politics by pledging to wind back spending on Welcomes to Country if it formed government.
“Welcomes to Country should be reserved for rare occasions, especially when the taxpayer is being asked to pick up the tab,” the opposition’s Indigenous affairs spokeswoman, Senator Jacinta Nampijinpa Price, said in February this year.
Clive Palmer’s $100 million ad blitz has kept the issue alive ahead of next weekend’s election, with banners that declare: “We don’t need to be welcomed to our own country.” The ad ran in metropolitan newspapers on Anzac Day, including this masthead.
Then, on Friday, neo-Nazis agitators hijacked the conversation.
Josh Roose, an academic at Deakin University who specialises in extremism, said it demonstrated the latest tactics of far-right extremists, who are seeking to appropriate “anti-woke” talking points for their own ends as they stage attention-seeking stunts during this year’s election campaign.
“What they’re tending to do is tie their extreme views into a wider backlash from a small but vocal minority on the right, who stand against the Welcome to Country. In so doing, they attempt to cast themselves as standing against woke politics, but what is really behind this is a hate-filled ideology,” Roose said.
The Anzac Day incidents serve as a warning to mainstream political parties, underscoring the risk of fuelling parts of the culture wars when an emboldened far-right movement is ready to pounce.
The Welcome to Country has been performed in modern Australia since the 1970s and springs from ancient Indigenous customs. Elders who perform the ceremony describe it not as a welcome to Australia, but a respectful welcome to tribal lands that Indigenous groups gave each other as they moved across the country in centuries past, akin to a form of border control.
Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and Opposition Leader Peter Dutton sought to deny the agitators any impact on Friday. They roundly condemned the disruptions as disgraceful and disrespectful, and reminded Australians of the day’s intention to commemorate soldiers, including Indigenous veterans.
Dutton went a step further. “Welcome to Country is an important part of official ceremonies and it should be respected, and I don’t agree with the booing,” he said. “We have a proud Indigenous heritage in this country, and we should be proud to celebrate it as part of today.”
His move shut down any mainstream momentum the hecklers might have hoped to generate and reinforced a consensus in favour of Welcome to Country ceremonies, despite the Coalition’s prior concerns.
In doing so, Dutton locked out the agitators and set their cause back. It was a powerful lesson on a sombre day.
https://www.theage.com.au/politics/federal/anger-at-anzac-day-backfire-holds-lessons-for-cultural-warriors-20250425-p5luag.html
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jZ3X4bhmo_0
https://qresear.ch/?q=Jacob+Hersant
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.51094
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22954287 (260216ZAPR25) Notable: Q Post #4923 - https://twitter.com/VRSVirginia/status/1319071346282778624 - Dearest Virginia - We stand with you. Now and always. Find peace through prayer. Never give up the good fight. God bless you. Q - https://qanon.pub/#4923 - https://qanon.pub/#1054 - https://qanon.pub/#4568 - https://qanon.pub/#4728
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Prominent Epstein survivor Virginia Giuffre dies, aged 41
STAFF WRITERS - 26 April 2025
Virginia Giuffre, who accused Prince Andrew and Jeffrey Epstein of sexual abuse, has died by suicide.
“It is with utterly broken hearts that we announce that Virginia passed away last night at her farm in Western Australia,” her family said in a statement provided to The Australian.
“She lost her life to suicide, after being a lifelong victim of sexual abuse and sex trafficking.
Virginia was a fierce warrior in the fight against sexual abuse and sex trafficking. She was the light that lifted so many survivors. Despite all the adversity she faced in her life, she shone so bright. She will be missed beyond measure.
“The light of her life were her children Christian, Noah, and Emily. It was when she held her newborn daughter in her arms that Virginia realized she had to fight back against those who had abused her and so many others.
“There are no words that can express the grave loss we feel today with the passing of our sweet Virginia. She was heroic and will always be remembered for her incredible courage and loving spirit.
“In the end, the toll of abuse is so heavy that it became unbearable for Virginia to handle its weight. We know that she is with the angels.
Ms Guiffre’s lawyer Sigrid McCawley described her as an “incredible champion for other victims”.
“Her courage pushed me to fight harder, and her strength was awe-inspiring. The world has lost an amazing human being today,” she said.
Her representative Dini von Mueffling said Ms Guiffre was one of the most extraordinary human beings she had ever known.
“Deeply loving, wise, and funny, she was a beacon to other survivors and victims. She adored her children and many animals. She was always more concerned with me than with herself. I will miss her beyond words. It was the privilege of a lifetime to represent her.”
https://www.theaustralian.com.au/world/prominent-epstein-survivor-virginia-giuffre-dies-aged-41/news-story/b3ecba47c8bff0a78e67c1f4dac751cb
https://archive.is/GDWnE
—
Q Post #4923
Oct 21 2020 20:55:05 (EST)
https://twitter.com/VRSVirginia/status/1319071346282778624
Dearest Virginia -
We stand with you.
Now and always.
Find peace through prayer.
Never give up the good fight.
God bless you.
Q
https://qanon.pub/#4923
https://qanon.pub/#4568
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73395
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22959474 (270743ZAPR25) Notable: ‘Heroic, fierce warrior’:Family’s tribute to Virginia Giuffre- Virginia Giuffre, who accused Prince Andrew and Jeffrey Epstein of sexual abuse, has died by suicide. “It is with utterly broken hearts that we announce that Virginia passed away last night at her farm in Western Australia,” her family said in a statement provided to The Australian. On Saturday in Perth, West Australian police confirmed the death. “About 9.50pm Friday 25 April 2025, emergency services received a report a woman had been located unresponsive at a residence in Neergabby,” police media said. “Police and St John WA attended and provided emergency first-aid. Sadly, the 41-year-old woman was declared deceased at the scene. The death is being investigated by Major Crime detectives; early indication is the death is not suspicious.” The family statement said Ms Giuffre had “lost her life to suicide, after being a lifelong victim of sexual abuse and sex trafficking. Virginia was a fierce warrior in the fight against sexual abuse and sex trafficking. She was the light that lifted so many survivors. Despite all the adversity she faced in her life, she shone so bright. She will be missed beyond measure.” Ms Giuffre is acknowledged as the woman who undid Epstein and his racket in Nigel Crawthorne’s 2022 book, Virginia Giuffre: the extraordinary life story of the masseuse who pursued and ended the sex crimes of Ghislane Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>51094 (pb)
‘Heroic, fierce warrior’: family’s tribute to Virginia Giuffre
PAIGE TAYLOR - April 26, 2025
1/2
Virginia Giuffre, who accused Prince Andrew and Jeffrey Epstein of sexual abuse, has died by suicide.
“It is with utterly broken hearts that we announce that Virginia passed away last night at her farm in Western Australia,” her family said in a statement provided to The Australian.
On Saturday in Perth, West Australian police confirmed the death.
“About 9.50pm Friday 25 April 2025, emergency services received a report a woman had been located unresponsive at a residence in Neergabby,” police media said.
“Police and St John WA attended and provided emergency first-aid. Sadly, the 41-year-old woman was declared deceased at the scene.
“The death is being investigated by Major Crime detectives; early indication is the death is not suspicious.”
The family statement said Ms Giuffre had “lost her life to suicide, after being a lifelong victim of sexual abuse and sex trafficking”.
“Virginia was a fierce warrior in the fight against sexual abuse and sex trafficking. She was the light that lifted so many survivors. Despite all the adversity she faced in her life, she shone so bright. She will be missed beyond measure.”
Ms Giuffre is acknowledged as the woman who undid Epstein and his racket in Nigel Crawthorne’s 2022 book, Virginia Giuffre: the extraordinary life story of the masseuse who pursued and ended the sex crimes of Ghislane Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein.
In 2009 she was identified as only as Jane Doe 102 in a lawsuit accusing financier Jeffrey Epstein of trafficking her in a sex ring when she was a minor. The lawsuit named socialite Ghislane Maxwell – daughter of British publisher and fraudster Robert Maxwell – as Epstein’s co-conspirator who recruited Ms Giuffre at Donald Trump’s Mar-a-Lago resort in Florida.
Ms Giuffre was a locker-room assistant there and Maxwell had offered her a job as a masseuse. In the lawsuit, she alleged she was required to have sex with men “including royalty”.
In 2015, Ms Giuffre waved her anonymity and told her story in the Mail on Sunday.
Four years later, Epstein was arrested and charged with sex trafficking and conspiracy. He was found dead in prison in New York on August 10, 2019, after details from Ms Giuffre’s successful defamation case against him were made public.
In 2021, Ms Giuffre filed a civil suit against Prince Andrew alleging that Epstein delivered her to the Duke as part of the sex ring. She accused Prince Andrew – brother to King Charles – of sexually assaulting her at Ms Maxwell’s home in London and at Mr Epstein’s properties in Manhattan and the Virgin Islands.
Prince Andrew denied the allegations and said he could not recall ever meeting Ms Giuffre. However he settled the case without an admission of wrongdoing and by making a payment to Ms Giuffre’s charity rumoured to be in the millions.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73396
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22959477 (270745ZAPR25) Notable: Q Post #4923 - https://twitter.com/VRSVirginia/status/1319071346282778624 - Dearest Virginia - We stand with you. Now and always. Find peace through prayer. Never give up the good fight. God bless you. Q - https://qanon.pub/#4923 - https://qanon.pub/#4568
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73395
2/2
Ms Giuffre moved to Australia with her husband, Robert, in 2020 and had been living relatively quietly in a beachside suburb of Perth, Western Australia. When their marriage ended, thought to have been last year, Ms Giuffre posted on social media that she longed to see their three children. She was hospitalised in March for more than a week, initially with what The Australian has been told was neck and back pain. There was shock and concern for her at the time because she had posted on Instagram that she was in renal failure and had just days to live.
Her family said the light of her life were her children, Christian, Noah, and Emily.
“It was when she held her newborn daughter in her arms that Virginia realised she had to fight back against those who had abused her and so many others.
“There are no words that can express the grave loss we feel today with the passing of our sweet Virginia. She was heroic and will always be remembered for her incredible courage and loving spirit.
“In the end, the toll of abuse is so heavy that it became unbearable for Virginia to handle its weight. We know that she is with the angels.”
Ms Guiffre’s lawyer, Sigrid McCawley, described her as an “incredible champion for other victims”.
“Her courage pushed me to fight harder, and her strength was awe-inspiring. The world has lost an amazing human being today,” she said.
Her representative, Dini von Mueffling, said Ms Guiffre was one of the most extraordinary human beings she had ever known.
“Deeply loving, wise, and funny, she was a beacon to other survivors and victims. She adored her children and many animals. She was always more concerned with me than with herself. I will miss her beyond words. It was the privilege of a lifetime to represent her.”
Lifeline: 13 11 14
https://www.theaustralian.com.au/world/prominent-epstein-survivor-virginia-giuffre-dies-aged-41/news-story/b3ecba47c8bff0a78e67c1f4dac751cb
https://www.instagram.com/virginiarobertsrising11/p/DH0vvDKzDvu/
—
Q Post #4923
Oct 21 2020 20:55:05 (EST)
https://twitter.com/VRSVirginia/status/1319071346282778624
Dearest Virginia -
We stand with you.
Now and always.
Find peace through prayer.
Never give up the good fight.
God bless you.
Q
https://qanon.pub/#4923
https://qanon.pub/#4568
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73397
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22959480 (270750ZAPR25) Notable: Virginia Giuffre Tweet: (December 2019) I am making it publicy known that in no way, shape or form am I sucidal. I have made this known to my therapist and GP- If something happens to me- in the sake of my family do not let this go away and help me to protect them. Too many evil people want to see me quiteted - https://archive.is/20250426022544/https://x.com/VRSVirginia/status/1204620018035462144 - https://x.com/Venau/status/1915951801288863907
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73395
Virginia Giuffre Tweet
December 2019
I am making it publicy known that in no way, shape or form am I sucidal. I have made this known to my therapist and GP- If something happens to me- in the sake of my family do not let this go away and help me to protect them. Too many evil people want to see me quiteted
https://x.com/VRSVirginia/status/1204620018035462144
https://archive.is/20250426022544/https://x.com/VRSVirginia/status/1204620018035462144
https://x.com/Venau/status/1915951801288863907
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73398
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22959516 (270811ZAPR25) Notable: Video: Virginia Giuffre, accuser of Jeffrey Epstein and Prince Andrew, dies by suicide - Virginia Giuffre, the American-Australian woman who accused paedophile Jeffrey Epstein of trafficking her, has died by suicide, her family confirmed. Ms Giuffre was found unresponsive in the Western Australian farming area of Neergabby, about one-hour north of Perth, where she had been living for the past several years. The family announced "with utterly broken hearts" that Ms Giuffre died on Thursday. - Sky News Australia
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73395
Virginia Giuffre, accuser of Jeffrey Epstein and Prince Andrew, dies by suicide
Sky News Australia
Apr 26, 2025
Virginia Giuffre, the American-Australian woman who accused paedophile Jeffrey Epstein of trafficking her, has died by suicide, her family confirmed.
Ms Giuffre was found unresponsive in the Western Australian farming area of Neergabby, about one-hour north of Perth, where she had been living for the past several years.
The family announced "with utterly broken hearts" that Ms Giuffre died on Thursday.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YH8W2ktxXIU
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73399
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22959520 (270812ZAPR25) Notable: Video: Virginia Giuffre, prominent accuser of Jeffrey Epstein dies aged 41 - Virginia Giuffre, a prominent accuser of Jeffrey Epstein and Prince Andrew, has died aged 41. - ABC News Australia
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73395
Virginia Giuffre, prominent accuser of Jeffrey Epstein dies aged 41
ABC News (Australia)
Apr 26, 2025
Virginia Giuffre, a prominent accuser of Jeffrey Epstein and Prince Andrew, has died aged 41.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=twFuLaut1J4
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73400
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22959524 (270813ZAPR25) Notable: Video: Virginia Giuffre, one of Jeffrey Epstein's most prominent abuse survivors, dies by suicide - Virginia Giuffre, one of the most prominent survivors of Jeffrey Epstein’s sexual abuse, has died by suicide, her family said Friday. Giuffre, 41, was one of the earliest and loudest voices calling for criminal charges against Epstein and his enablers. Other Epstein abuse survivors later credited her with giving them the courage to speak out. NBC News' Stephanie Gosk reports. - NBC News
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73395
Virginia Giuffre, one of Jeffrey Epstein's most prominent abuse survivors, dies by suicide
NBC News
Apr 26, 2025
Virginia Giuffre, one of the most prominent survivors of Jeffrey Epstein’s sexual abuse, has died by suicide, her family said Friday. Giuffre, 41, was one of the earliest and loudest voices calling for criminal charges against Epstein and his enablers. Other Epstein abuse survivors later credited her with giving them the courage to speak out. NBC News' Stephanie Gosk reports.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3hUoJjuYpkI
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73401
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22959530 (270814ZAPR25) Notable: Video: Virginia Giuffre, accuser of Jeffrey Epstein and Prince Andrew, dies at 41 - Virginia Giuffre, who accused Britain's Prince Andrew and other influential men of sexually exploiting her as a teenager trafficked by financier Jeffrey Epstein, has died. She was 41. - ABC7 USA
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73395
Virginia Giuffre, accuser of Jeffrey Epstein and Prince Andrew, dies at 41
ABC7
Apr 26, 2025
Virginia Giuffre, who accused Britain's Prince Andrew and other influential men of sexually exploiting her as a teenager trafficked by financier Jeffrey Epstein, has died. She was 41.
Full story: https://abc7.com/post/virginia-giuffre-accused-britains-prince-andrew-jeffrey-epstein-sex-trafficking-scandal-has-died/16251490/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XCdmWHf1gCk
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73402
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22959533 (270815ZAPR25) Notable: Video: Woman who accused Britain's Prince Andrew in Epstein sex trafficking scandal has died - Woman who accused Britain's Prince Andrew in Epstein sex trafficking scandal has died - WPBF 25 News USA
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73395
Woman who accused Britain's Prince Andrew in Epstein sex trafficking scandal has died
WPBF 25 News
Apr 26, 2025
Woman who accused Britain's Prince Andrew in Epstein sex trafficking scandal has died
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eBAyOJXPmLM
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73403
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22959539 (270816ZAPR25) Notable: Video: Epstein and Prince Andrew Accuser Virginia Giuffre Dies At 41 - Virginia Giuffre the woman who accused Jeffrey Epstein and Prince Andrew of sex crimes has died, aged 41. Her family has issued a statement, confirming she died by suicide at her farm near Perth overnight. They're remembering her as a fierce warrior in the fight against sex trafficking, and a champion for survivors. - 10 News First Australia
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73395
Epstein and Prince Andrew Accuser Virginia Giuffre Dies At 41
10 News First
Apr 26, 2025
Virginia Giuffre the woman who accused Jeffrey Epstein and Prince Andrew of sex crimes has died, aged 41.
Her family has issued a statement, confirming she died by suicide at her farm near Perth overnight.
They're remembering her as a fierce warrior in the fight against sex trafficking, and a champion for survivors.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ozV7AhOEEeQ
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73404
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22959543 (270817ZAPR25) Notable: Video: Virginia Giuffre, who accused Britain's Prince Andrew in Epstein sex trafficking scandal, has died - Giuffre died of suicide at her home in western Australia, according to her publicist. - KTVN 2 News Nevada
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73395
Virginia Giuffre, who accused Britain's Prince Andrew in Epstein sex trafficking scandal, has died
KTVN 2 News Nevada
Apr 26, 2025
Giuffre died of suicide at her home in western Australia, according to her publicist.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZmtT7PxJijA
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73405
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22959549 (270818ZAPR25) Notable: Video: Virginia Giuffre, Prince Andrew and Jeffrey Epstein accuser, dies - Virginia Giuffre, who accused Prince Andrew and Jeffrey Epstein of sexual abuse, has died by suicide aged 41, her family has said. Ms Giuffre was one of the most outspoken accusers of convicted sex offenders Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell, his former girlfriend. She alleged they trafficked her to the Duke of York when she was 17, which Prince Andrew has strenuously denied. Relatives said in a statement on Friday that she had been a "fierce warrior in the fight against sexual abuse", and that the "toll of abuse… became unbearable". - BBC News
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73395
Virginia Giuffre, Prince Andrew and Jeffrey Epstein accuser, dies
BBC News
Apr 26, 2025
Virginia Giuffre, who accused Prince Andrew and Jeffrey Epstein of sexual abuse, has died by suicide aged 41, her family has said.
Ms Giuffre was one of the most outspoken accusers of convicted sex offenders Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell, his former girlfriend.
She alleged they trafficked her to the Duke of York when she was 17, which Prince Andrew has strenuously denied.
Relatives said in a statement on Friday that she had been a "fierce warrior in the fight against sexual abuse", and that the "toll of abuse... became unbearable".
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QeXrfu7fVpU
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73406
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22959575 (270822ZAPR25) Notable: Video: Virginia Giuffre, prominent survivor of Jeffrey Epstein’s sexual abuse, dies by suicide - Virginia Giuffre, an outspoken survivor of Jeffrey Epstein’s sexual abuse, has died by suicide, her family has reported. Giuffre was one of the first people to call for criminal charges against Epstein. Giuffre recounted how she was groomed by Ghislaine Maxwell to be sexually abused by Epstein. She once said Epstein passed her around “like a platter of fruit” to other men when she was a teenager. She also accused Epstein of trafficking her to Prince Andrew when she was 17, which the prince has denied. According to interviews and depositions, Giuffre said she was recruited to the sex ring in 2000 by Maxwell while working as a locker room attendant in Donald Trump’s Mar-a-Lago. She was 41 when she died at her farm in Neergabby, Australia. If you are based in the U.S. and you or someone you know needs mental health assistance right now, call the National Suicide Prevention Helpline at 1-800-273-TALK (8255). This is a free, confidential crisis hotline available 24 hours a day, seven days a week. If you are in another country, you can go to www.befrienders.org to find a helpline near you. If you are experiencing feelings of distress, or are struggling to cope, you can also speak to the Samaritans, in confidence, on 116 123 (UK and ROI), email jo@samaritans.org, or visit the Samaritans website to find details of your nearest branch. - The Independent UK
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73395
Virginia Giuffre, prominent survivor of Jeffrey Epstein’s sexual abuse, dies by suicide
The Independent
Apr 26, 2025
Virginia Giuffre, an outspoken survivor of Jeffrey Epstein’s sexual abuse, has died by suicide, her family has reported.
Giuffre was one of the first people to call for criminal charges against Epstein. Giuffre recounted how she was groomed by Ghislaine Maxwell to be sexually abused by Epstein. She once said Epstein passed her around “like a platter of fruit” to other men when she was a teenager.
She also accused Epstein of trafficking her to Prince Andrew when she was 17, which the prince has denied.
According to interviews and depositions, Giuffre said she was recruited to the sex ring in 2000 by Maxwell while working as a locker room attendant in Donald Trump’s Mar-a-Lago.
She was 41 when she died at her farm in Neergabby, Australia.
If you are based in the U.S. and you or someone you know needs mental health assistance right now, call the National Suicide Prevention Helpline at 1-800-273-TALK (8255). This is a free, confidential crisis hotline available 24 hours a day, seven days a week. If you are in another country, you can go to www.befrienders.org to find a helpline near you.
If you are experiencing feelings of distress, or are struggling to cope, you can also speak to the Samaritans, in confidence, on 116 123 (UK and ROI), email jo@samaritans.org, or visit the Samaritans website to find details of your nearest branch.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vlM6lXVPveQ
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73407
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22959582 (270823ZAPR25) Notable: Video: Jeffrey Epstein and Prince Andrew's accuser, Virginia Giuffre, dies - Virginia Giuffre, who accused Prince Andrew and Jeffrey Epstein of sexual abuse, has died aged 41. Ms Giuffre's family released a statement confirming her death at her property in rural Western Australia. - ABC News Australia
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73395
Jeffrey Epstein and Prince Andrew's accuser, Virginia Giuffre, dies
ABC News (Australia)
Apr 26, 2025
Virginia Giuffre, who accused Prince Andrew and Jeffrey Epstein of sexual abuse, has died aged 41.
Ms Giuffre's family released a statement confirming her death at her property in rural Western Australia.
Read more here: https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-04-26/virginia-giuffre-jeffrey-epstein-accuser-dies/105219384
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wq0SdmZ0JuM
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73408
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22959589 (270824ZAPR25) Notable: Video: Virginia Giuffre dies aged 41 - Giuffre’s family issue statement confirming she killed herself at her farm in Western Australia. - news.com.au
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73395
Virginia Giuffre dies aged 41
news.com.au
Apr 26, 2025
Giuffre’s family issue statement confirming she killed herself at her farm in Western Australia,
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yEsLzqCFcmI
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73409
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22959594 (270825ZAPR25) Notable: Video: Virginia Giuffre, who accused Prince Andrew of sexual assault, has died, her family says - Virginia Giuffre, who accused Prince Andrew of sexual assault, has died aged 41. In a statement to Sky's US partner network NBC News on Friday, her family said she took her own life in the Perth suburb of Neergabby, Australia, where she had been living for several years. Anyone feeling emotionally distressed or suicidal can call Samaritans for help on 116 123 or email jo@samaritans.org in the UK. In the US, call the Samaritans branch in your area or 1 (800) 273-TALK. - Sky News UK
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73395
Virginia Giuffre, who accused Prince Andrew of sexual assault, has died, her family says
Sky News
Apr 26, 2025
Virginia Giuffre, who accused Prince Andrew of sexual assault, has died aged 41.
In a statement to Sky's US partner network NBC News on Friday, her family said she took her own life in the Perth suburb of Neergabby, Australia, where she had been living for several years.
Read more: https://news.sky.com/story/virginia-giuffre-who-accused-prince-andrew-of-sexual-assault-has-died-her-family-says-13355731
Anyone feeling emotionally distressed or suicidal can call Samaritans for help on 116 123 or email jo@samaritans.org in the UK. In the US, call the Samaritans branch in your area or 1 (800) 273-TALK.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EGRMfN9JAQM
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73410
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22959601 (270827ZAPR25) Notable: Video: Virginia Giuffre dead: Prince Andrew accuser commits suicide after 'toll of abuse' became too heavy - 'Police have said there is nothing at this time to indicate anything suspicious.' Seven News Perth Reporter, James Carmody, discusses the death of 41-year-old Virginia Giuffre, who committed suicide after 'the toll of abuse' became too heavy. - GBNews UK
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73395
Virginia Giuffre dead: Prince Andrew accuser commits suicide after 'toll of abuse' became too heavy
GBNews
Apr 26, 2025
'Police have said there is nothing at this time to indicate anything suspicious.'
Seven News Perth Reporter, James Carmody, discusses the death of 41-year-old Virginia Giuffre, who committed suicide after 'the toll of abuse' became too heavy.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6wkzVmSAi5A
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73411
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22959621 (270835ZAPR25) Notable: WikiLeaks Tweet: "Now Julian is free, we have all come to Rome to express our family’s gratitude for the Pope’s support during Julian’s persecution. Our children and I had the honor of meeting Pope Francis in June 2023 to discuss how to free Julian from Belmarsh prison. Francis wrote to Julian in prison and even proposed to grant him asylum at the Vatican." - Stella Assange
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>51081 (pb)
>>50974 (pb)
WikiLeaks Tweet
7:01 PM · Apr 26, 2025
"Now Julian is free, we have all come to Rome to express our family’s gratitude for the Pope’s support during Julian’s persecution. Our children and I had the honor of meeting Pope Francis in June 2023 to discuss how to free Julian from Belmarsh prison. Francis wrote to Julian in prison and even proposed to grant him asylum at the Vatican." - Stella Assange
https://x.com/wikileaks/status/1916055022233677843
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73412
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22959625 (270837ZAPR25) Notable: Video: Julian Assange joins mourners in Vatican City for Pope Francis's funeral - WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange was among thousands of mourners who gathered in Rome for the funeral of Pope Francis. - Sky News Australia
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73411
Julian Assange joins mourners in Vatican City for Pope Francis's funeral
Sky News Australia
Apr 26, 2025
WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange was among thousands of mourners who gathered in Rome for the funeral of Pope Francis.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cmOgNEsMTeE
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73413
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22959629 (270838ZAPR25) Notable: Video: Julian Assange Seen at Vatican on Day of Pope's Funeral - Storyful News & Weather USA
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73411
Julian Assange Seen at Vatican on Day of Pope's Funeral
Storyful News & Weather
Apr 26, 2025
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MlqxLExTb0U
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73414
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22959632 (270839ZAPR25) Notable: Video: Julian Assange visits St Peter's square with family to attend funeral of Pope Francis - Julian Assange visits St Peter's square with family to attend funeral of Pope Francis - Global Pulse USA
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73411
Julian Assange visits St Peter's square with family to attend funeral of Pope Francis
Global Pulse
Apr 26, 2025
Julian Assange visits St Peter's square with family to attend funeral of Pope Francis
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Uvto7ciWQLE
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73415
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22964021 (280830ZAPR25) Notable: Hung parliament looms as possible federal election outcome, Newspoll shows - Almost half of all voters believe the Albanese government should be thrown out of office, but a greater number remain unconvinced that a Peter Dutton-led Coalition was ready to govern with the election still potentially poised to produce a hung parliament. An exclusive Newspoll conducted for The Australian shows no shift in the primary vote for either Labor or the Coalition over the past week, with combined support for both the major parties remaining at a near-record low heading into the final week of the campaign. With the Liberal leader declaring the election was still winnable, Labor’s primary vote remains unchanged from last week at 34 per cent compared to the Coalition’s primary vote of 35 per cent for the second poll in a row. This is a 1.4 per cent improvement for Labor on its May 2022 election result, which saw Labor elected on its lowest ever primary vote at an election. But the Coalition’s primary vote remains lower than its last election result of 35.7 per cent, which produced the lowest level of representation since the Liberal Party was formed under Robert Menzies. It also confirms the narrowest gap between the two major parties on primary vote since October 2023 prior to the failed voice referendum.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50833 (pb)
Hung parliament looms as possible federal election outcome, Newspoll shows
SIMON BENSON - 28 April 2025
1/2
Almost half of all voters believe the Albanese government should be thrown out of office, but a greater number remain unconvinced that a Peter Dutton-led Coalition was ready to govern with the election still potentially poised to produce a hung parliament.
An exclusive Newspoll conducted for The Australian shows no shift in the primary vote for either Labor or the Coalition over the past week, with combined support for both the major parties remaining at a near-record low heading into the final week of the campaign.
With the Liberal leader declaring the election was still winnable, Labor’s primary vote remains unchanged from last week at 34 per cent compared to the Coalition’s primary vote of 35 per cent for the second poll in a row.
This is a 1.4 per cent improvement for Labor on its May 2022 election result, which saw Labor elected on its lowest ever primary vote at an election.
But the Coalition’s primary vote remains lower than its last election result of 35.7 per cent, which produced the lowest level of representation since the Liberal Party was formed under Robert Menzies. It also confirms the narrowest gap between the two major parties on primary vote since October 2023 prior to the failed voice referendum.
The news for Mr Dutton – who reunited with former prime minister John Howard in the teal-held Sydney North Shore seat of Mackellar on Sunday – also continues to worsen, with approval of the Liberal leader’s performance falling further to a new low to a net negative approval rating of minus 24.
Anthony Albanese’s net approval is unchanged at minus nine. Mr Albanese maintains a 16-point lead as the preferred prime minister.
The most recent poll was conducted during a structural pause in the campaign, taking in the shortened week between Easter and the Anzac Day long weekends and the death of his Holiness Pope Francis.
The most significant campaign announcement of the week was the Coalition’s defence policy in which it announced a $21bn increase to defence funding to ready the nation against rising geopolitical instability.
The Newspoll survey showed voters remain unimpressed with the Albanese government’s performance over the past three years, with only 39 per cent of voters believing that Labor deserved to be re-elected.
This is a five-point improvement for Labor since February when this number was at 34 per cent and 53 per cent of voters believed that the government should not be re-elected and that someone else should be given a go.
This number has fallen to 48 per cent in the latest Newspoll survey but continues to show that more people than not believe the Albanese government did not deserve to be given a second term.
Running in Labor’s favour, however, is that a greater number of voters, 62 per cent, are unconvinced that a Dutton-led Liberal/Nationals Coalition was ready to govern.
This is a seven-point increase on the 55 per cent of voters who felt this way in February.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73416
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22964024 (280834ZAPR25) Notable: Dutton doesn’t want Welcome to Country on Anzac Day - Opposition Leader Peter Dutton has escalated his intervention in a contest over Welcome to Country ceremonies by saying they should not be conducted on Anzac Day because most veterans did not want them included. Dutton’s comments will inflame the debate that has unfolded since far-right hecklers disrupted ceremonies at Anzac Day services in Perth and Melbourne on Friday. Both Dutton and Prime Minister Anthony Albanese condemned the agitators, who included known neo-Nazis, and called for respect last week. But Dutton changed his tone on Monday, latching onto the culture war to take a strong stance on Welcome to Country while the Coalition’s agenda on immigration and road taxes were being called into question over conflicting statements from frontbenchers. He also criticised Qantas’ practice of acknowledging Indigenous lands on its flights, saying they were over the top. Asked at a press conference on Monday if an Anzac Day dawn service was an event significant enough for Welcome to Country, the opposition leader said it was not. “No would be my answer to that. It is ultimately for the organisers of the events and they can make the decision based on their membership,” he said. “But listening to a lot of veterans in the space, Anzac Day is about our veterans ... I think the majority view would be that they don’t want it on that day.”
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>51093 (pb)
>>73415
Dutton doesn’t want Welcome to Country on Anzac Day
Natassia Chrysanthos and Olivia Ireland - April 28, 2025
1/2
Opposition Leader Peter Dutton has escalated his intervention in a contest over Welcome to Country ceremonies by saying they should not be conducted on Anzac Day because most veterans did not want them included.
Dutton’s comments will inflame the debate that has unfolded since far-right hecklers disrupted ceremonies at Anzac Day services in Perth and Melbourne on Friday. Both Dutton and Prime Minister Anthony Albanese condemned the agitators, who included known neo-Nazis, and called for respect last week.
But Dutton changed his tone on Monday, latching onto the culture war to take a strong stance on Welcome to Country while the Coalition’s agenda on immigration and road taxes were being called into question over conflicting statements from frontbenchers.
He also criticised Qantas’ practice of acknowledging Indigenous lands on its flights, saying they were over the top.
Asked at a press conference on Monday if an Anzac Day dawn service was an event significant enough for Welcome to Country, the opposition leader said it was not.
“No would be my answer to that. It is ultimately for the organisers of the events and they can make the decision based on their membership,” he said.
“But listening to a lot of veterans in the space, Anzac Day is about our veterans ... I think the majority view would be that they don’t want it on that day.”
Labor sought to avoid the debate after Dutton called the ceremonies divisive at the Sunday night leaders’ debate. Albanese saying that Welcome to Country ceremonies were a sign of respect but should be held at the discretion of event organisers.
Labor campaign spokesman Jason Clare called on Australians to “remember where all of this began” as the debate continued on Monday. “On Friday, it sort of spawned out of the actions of neo-Nazis interrupting an Anzac Day dawn service,” he said.
“I don’t think any of us want to find ourselves on the same side of this argument as neo-Nazis.”
Coalition spokeswoman for Indigenous Australians, Jacinta Nampijinpa Price, backed Dutton’s call on Welcome to Country being overdone.
Speaking on Sky News, Price said they should be reserved for special occasions such as when parliament resumes.
“My position has always been that we have absolutely overdone Welcome to Country and Acknowledgement of country, especially when they become politicised sort of statements that are divisive, as opposed to you know, feeling like it is a welcome,” she said.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73417
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22964027 (280839ZAPR25) Notable: Kooyong MP Monique Ryan a ‘Zionist’ as Jewish leaders urge action - Kooyong MP Monique Ryan has declared she’s a supporter of Zionism and conceded that she made “mistakes” after October 7, having previously backed an arrest warrant for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and voiced support for the United Nations’ Hamas-linked aid agency. Most of her fellow teals failed to back Dr Ryan’s vocal support for Zionism as she said she “utterly supported” Israel’s self-determination and supported calls for a judicial inquiry into rising anti-Semitism in Australia. At a community forum in Kooyong on Thursday, Dr Ryan said she was supportive of Zionism, which she defined as “belief in the right of Jewish people to make a homeland in Israel and in the self-determination of Israel”. “I’m utterly supportive of that,” she said. Although Jewish leaders welcomed her stance, they warned that supporting Israel must go beyond “sound bites”. “Monique’s voting record, including voting often with the Greens and continued backing of UNRWA funding, suggest otherwise … Support for Zionism can’t end at a sound bite,” Zionism Victoria president Elyse Schachna said. “Backing Zionism and the Jewish community means opposing those who deny Israel’s legitimacy or excuse terrorism, and we haven’t consistently seen that from Monique. The Jewish community is paying close attention and actions will always speak louder than words.”
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50823 (pb)
>>73415
Kooyong MP Monique Ryan a ‘Zionist’ as Jewish leaders urge action
MOHAMMAD ALFARES and ALEXI DEMETRIADI - April 25, 2025
1/2
Kooyong MP Monique Ryan has declared she’s a supporter of Zionism and conceded that she made “mistakes” after October 7, having previously backed an arrest warrant for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and voiced support for the United Nations’ Hamas-linked aid agency.
Most of her fellow teals failed to back Dr Ryan’s vocal support for Zionism as she said she “utterly supported” Israel’s self-determination and supported calls for a judicial inquiry into rising anti-Semitism in Australia.
Wentworth incumbent Allegra Spender reiterated her steadfast support for Zionism and the large Jewish community in her electorate, and the teal independent has been one of parliament’s strongest voices against Australia’s anti-Semitism rise and supporters of Jewish Australians.
Jewish leaders have welcomed Dr Ryan’s new stance, but urged her rhetorical support to be accompanied by parliamentary action amid criticism of her voting being closely aligning with that of the Greens.
Dr Ryan’s support for Israel’s existence comes as she faces a challenge in her Melbourne seat from Liberal Amelia Hamer in what appears to be one of the Coalition’s last hopes of flipping one of the six seats it lost in 2022’s “teal wave”.
At a community forum in Kooyong on Thursday, Dr Ryan said she was supportive of Zionism, which she defined as “belief in the right of Jewish people to make a homeland in Israel and in the self-determination of Israel”. “I’m utterly supportive of that,” she said. Although Jewish leaders welcomed her stance, they warned that supporting Israel must go beyond “sound bites”.
“Monique’s voting record, including voting often with the Greens and continued backing of UNRWA funding, suggest otherwise … Support for Zionism can’t end at a sound bite,” Zionism Victoria president Elyse Schachna said. “Backing Zionism and the Jewish community means opposing those who deny Israel’s legitimacy or excuse terrorism, and we haven’t consistently seen that from Monique.
“The Jewish community is paying close attention and actions will always speak louder than words.”
Kooyong MP Monique Ryan has declared she’s a supporter of Zionism and conceded that she made “mistakes” after October 7, having previously backed an arrest warrant for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and voiced support for the United Nations’ Hamas-linked aid agency.
Most of her fellow teals failed to back Dr Ryan’s vocal support for Zionism as she said she “utterly supported” Israel’s self-determination and supported calls for a judicial inquiry into rising anti-Semitism in Australia.
Wentworth incumbent Allegra Spender reiterated her steadfast support for Zionism and the large Jewish community in her electorate, and the teal independent has been one of parliament’s strongest voices against Australia’s anti-Semitism rise and supporters of Jewish Australians.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73418
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22964031 (280844ZAPR25) Notable: Monique Ryan’s desperate cash grab as Kooyong race tightens - Kooyong MP Monique Ryan has resorted to a last-minute plea for $20,000 in donations after claiming shadowy conservative forces were conspiring against her as her grip on the once-safe Liberal seat slips. In an email to locals on Saturday, Dr Ryan accused the Liberal Party and conservative groups like Advance Australia, Australians for Prosperity and Better Australia of orchestrating “co-ordinated, well-funded” attacks designed to mislead voters. She mentioned neo-Nazi disruptions and grassroot anti-teal campaigners “Repeal the Teals” in an attempt to rally support during the final week of the campaign. Dr Ryan admitted she was scrambling for $20,000 to fund last-ditch digital advertising, telling supporters the seat could be decided by as few as 200 votes. The incumbent MP, who said she was facing an electorate of 37,000 undecided voters, claimed the “conservative ecosystem” - backed by the Liberals’ $120m “Cormack Foundation war chest” – was out to get her. “I never wanted to have to make this final financial ask, but I need to,” the email reads. “We need to raise $20,000 in the next few days to fund critical digital advertising - so we can cut through the noise, reach undecided voters, and tell them the truth. We’ve seen a scale of attacks I never thought possible – co-ordinated, well funded, and designed to mislead voters in the final stretch.”
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73415
>>73417
Monique Ryan’s desperate cash grab as Kooyong race tightens
MOHAMMAD ALFARES - 27 April 2025
1/2
Kooyong MP Monique Ryan has resorted to a last-minute plea for $20,000 in donations after claiming shadowy conservative forces were conspiring against her as her grip on the once-safe Liberal seat slips.
In an email to locals on Saturday, Dr Ryan accused the Liberal Party and conservative groups like Advance Australia, Australians for Prosperity and Better Australia of orchestrating “co-ordinated, well-funded” attacks designed to mislead voters.
She mentioned neo-Nazi disruptions and grassroot anti-teal campaigners “Repeal the Teals” in an attempt to rally support during the final week of the campaign.
Dr Ryan admitted she was scrambling for $20,000 to fund last-ditch digital advertising, telling supporters the seat could be decided by as few as 200 votes.
‘Conservative ecosystem’
The incumbent MP, who said she was facing an electorate of 37,000 undecided voters, claimed the “conservative ecosystem” – backed by the Liberals’ $120m “Cormack Foundation war chest” – was out to get her.
“I never wanted to have to make this final financial ask, but I need to,” the email reads.
“We need to raise $20,000 in the next few days to fund critical digital advertising – so we can cut through the noise, reach undecided voters, and tell them the truth. We’ve seen a scale of attacks I never thought possible – co-ordinated, well funded, and designed to mislead voters in the final stretch.
“These attacks aren’t just coming from the Liberal Party. They’re coming from a powerful conservative ecosystem: groups like Advance Australia, Australians for Prosperity, and Better Australia.
“Neo-Nazis disrupting a Kooyong community forum and the Anzac Day service at the Shrine of Remembrance. And ‘Repeal the Teals’ campaigners spreading disinformation at pre-poll booths. On top of that, the Liberals have their $120m Cormack Foundation war chest, funding wave after wave of attack ads.”
Ryan ‘panicking’: Paterson
The former pediatric neurologist turned independent climate campaigner does not publicly disclose political donations, in contrast to her teal colleague Zoe Daniel, who received $520,000 from Simon Holmes a Court’s Climate 200 group.
Mr Holmes a Court and Climate 200 were approached for comment.
Coalition campaign spokesman James Paterson said Dr Ryan was panicking because voters were beginning to see through what he described as the “teal political scam” from the last election.
“No desperate, last-minute fundraising appeal to her rich Climate 200 backers will change the fact that voters in Kooyong feel misled by teal politicians who said one thing before the election and behaved very differently afterwards,” he said.
“They (teals) sold themselves as a kinder, softer version of the Liberal Party, but once elected, aligned themselves with the extreme Greens – in Monique Ryan’s case, on 77 per cent of votes in the parliament.
“All from someone who runs away from the media and refuses to answer basic questions about her track record, Monique Ryan has shown nothing but disdain for our democratic process this election campaign.”
Dr Ryan came under fire last week after she refused to answer questions from Sky News and The Australian about her use of social media influencers to produce campaign material and of Climate 200’s role in backing her, despite standing on a platform of transparency and integrity in politics.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73419
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22964037 (280848ZAPR25) Notable: ‘Hate’ for Jacinta Allan, Victorian Labor diminishing party stronghold - Victorian Liberals remain confident Peter Dutton’s outer-suburban campaign strategy, combined with what Labor figures concede is “hate” towards Labor Premier Jacinta Allan, will see the party’s vote surge in the ALP stronghold of Bruce. While stopping short of predicting a surprise victory there on May 3, Liberals are reporting a positive response from voters in the electorate that Labor has held for some 29 years. Liberals hope this sense of support on top of a favourable redistribution that brought strong Liberal areas of Berwick into the electorate has weakened Labor’s grip enough to give them an outside chance. A Victoria Liberal identity who has been campaigning hard in the traditional Labor stronghold has stopped short of tipping a victory on Saturday, but predicted a surge in support. “I reckon it will be close,” they said. “It still feels OK.” A senior Victorian ALP source has conceded that while there was “no real concern” within the party that Bruce might fall to the Liberals, campaign staff had detected “lots of hate” directed to state Labor and the Premier among traditional Labor voters. “The days of this being a safe seat for us are over,” the source said. “Cost of living, state taxes, housing and the fact Labor’s been in power in Victoria for 21 of the past 25 years means they’re really blaming Labor.”
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50874 (pb)
>>73415
‘Hate’ for Jacinta Allan, Victorian Labor diminishing party stronghold
DAMON JOHNSTON - 27 April 2025
Victorian Liberals remain confident Peter Dutton’s outer-suburban campaign strategy, combined with what Labor figures concede is “hate” towards Labor Premier Jacinta Allan, will see the party’s vote surge in the ALP stronghold of Bruce.
While stopping short of predicting a surprise victory there on May 3, Liberals are reporting a positive response from voters in the electorate that Labor has held for some 29 years.
Liberals hope this sense of support on top of a favourable redistribution that brought strong Liberal areas of Berwick into the electorate has weakened Labor’s grip enough to give them an outside chance.
A Victoria Liberal identity who has been campaigning hard in the traditional Labor stronghold has stopped short of tipping a victory on Saturday, but predicted a surge in support. “I reckon it will be close,” they said. “It still feels OK.”
A senior Victorian ALP source has conceded that while there was “no real concern” within the party that Bruce might fall to the Liberals, campaign staff had detected “lots of hate” directed to state Labor and the Premier among traditional Labor voters.
“The days of this being a safe seat for us are over,” the source said. “Cost of living, state taxes, housing and the fact Labor’s been in power in Victoria for 21 of the past 25 years means they’re really blaming Labor.”
A Labor figure familiar with that region said the post-2022 election redistribution had weakened the ALP’s grip on the seat.
“It had a bad redistribution which took in Liberal parts of Berwick,” the Labor figure said. “On a good day, I would have said the Liberals could have a shot, but they’ve not had a good day for a long time. It’s close, though. State (Labor) is on the nose big time out there.”
Labor has held the seat since 1996, with Labor MP Julian Hill winning the electorate comfortably in 2016, 2019 and 2022.
Labor figures concede the redistribution, which the Australian Electoral Commission estimates has reduced the ALP margin over the Liberals to 5.31 per cent, has hurt the party and they are bracing for a close result on Saturday.
While Mr Hill was re-elected in 2022, AEC data shows Labor’s primary vote fell by about 6 per cent.
Labor has also described the campaign run by the Liberals’ Afghanistan-born candidate Zahid Safi as “passionate” and his cultural background was likely to attract traditional ALP voters in the local Afghan community.
Bruce borders the federal electorates of Chisholm and Aston, which are likely to fall to the Liberals.
Bruce takes in the booming suburbs of Cranbourne North, Narre Warren South, Berwick and Narre Warren North.
The AEC puts Labor’s post-redistribution margin in Chisholm at 3.33 per cent and the traditional Liberal seat of Aston at 3.57 per cent.
Liberal strategists hope voter anger at state Labor and the Premier will help sweep them to victory in both electorates.
The Opposition Leader has been hammering his outer-suburban strategy, particularly in Victoria, and on Sunday staged a campaign town hall meeting of party faithful in the Labor-held seat of Hawke in Melbourne’s northwest.
He asked the crowd to raise a hand if their power bill had come down by $275 since Labor was elected to government, to which the crowd laughed and stayed still.
Mr Dutton said the voice referendum, the broken power promise and the denial about falling off the stage added to a pattern of behaviour.
“We presented to the Australian people as a credible alternative government,” he said.
“It started with the voice when as a party and as Australians with similar values, we stood up because we didn’t like our country to be divided.
“We wanted to make sure we could help Indigenous Australians, but we weren’t going to divide our country on heritage or race.”
https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/hate-for-jacinta-allan-victorian-labor-diminishing-party-stronghold/news-story/bb16f675c8299472ea5c81bdaf1d5f40
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73420
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22964042 (280851ZAPR25) Notable: Election 2025: Muslim Votes Matter’s ‘strategic’ move to flip Labor seats - A pro-Palestine political movement aiming to elect Greens and independents has dramatically intervened to help the Liberal Party in Gough Whitlam’s old seat of Werriwa, in a “strategic” move to flex its electoral muscle to the ALP and punish Labor in a handful of marginal electorates. Werriwa is quickly becoming the Liberals’ last hope of snaring one of the ALP’s marginal southwest Sydney seats, which is held on a 5 per cent margin, and it is one of only four electorates where Muslim Votes Matter is preferencing the opposition over the government. In Werriwa, MVM’s how to vote card direct voters first toward the Greens and Libertarians, and then the Liberals before Labor. It’s a similar tactic being deployed in WA Labor-held marginals Cowan and Tangey, and Jim Chalmers’ Queensland seat of Rankin. Labor strategists have grown optimistic that incumbent Anne Stanley will hold off the Liberals’ Sam Kayal, but the final result could come down to just a thousand or so votes. Peter Dutton recently launched his party’s campaign in the seat, illustrative of how seriously it is vying for the electorate.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50820 (pb)
>>73415
Election 2025: Muslim Votes Matter’s ‘strategic’ move to flip Labor seats
ALEXI DEMETRIADI - April 24, 2025
1/2
A pro-Palestine political movement aiming to elect Greens and independents has dramatically intervened to help the Liberal Party in Gough Whitlam’s old seat of Werriwa, in a “strategic” move to flex its electoral muscle to the ALP and punish Labor in a handful of marginal electorates.
Werriwa is quickly becoming the Liberals’ last hope of snaring one of the ALP’s marginal southwest Sydney seats, which is held on a 5 per cent margin, and it is one of only four electorates where Muslim Votes Matter is preferencing the opposition over the government.
In Werriwa, MVM’s how to vote card direct voters first toward the Greens and Libertarians, and then the Liberals before Labor. It’s a similar tactic being deployed in WA Labor-held marginals Cowan and Tangey, and Jim Chalmers’ Queensland seat of Rankin.
Labor strategists have grown optimistic that incumbent Anne Stanley will hold off the Liberals’ Sam Kayal, but the final result could come down to just a thousand or so votes. Peter Dutton recently launched his party’s campaign in the seat, illustrative of how seriously it is vying for the electorate.
MVM is one of two separate political pressure groups from Australia’s Muslim community that emerged in mid-2024, instigated by anger over the government’s handling of the Israel-Hamas war.
It has published how to vote cards for each division, with volunteers already descending onto pre-polling stations at its target seats across the country, and its decision to preference Mr Kayal over Ms Stanley could, given how close Werriwa is shaping up, help flip the seat to the Liberals.
The move is in contrast to the method eventually taken by The Muslim Vote: a totally separate but similar organisation that has focused more on supporting two independent candidates in Watson and Blaxland.
Those candidates ended months of speculation about a possible deal with the Liberals, preferencing Labor incumbents Tony Burke and Jason Clare above the Coalition, but which simultaneously makes the route to topple the ALP pair more difficult.
The placing of Mr Kayal ahead of Ms Stanley has angered Labor insiders, who said it went against the group’s supposed ethos, but MVM national spokesman Ghaith Krayem said the organisation’s aims had been clear since its establishment, telling The Australian it had identified Werriwa as a seat it could have a “strategic impact” in.
“Werriwa fits well within our intentions,” Mr Krayem said, noting that about 12 per cent of the electorate were Muslim Australian voters.
“To hold incumbent MPs to account for their response – or a lack of – to (what’s happening in) Gaza, our ability to mobilise our community and for the ability to demonstrate that strategic impact we can have.
“And those three (intentions) dovetail into Werriwa, which we think is on a knife edge.”
Mr Krayem said MVM was not specifically “anti-Labor” and that it its strategy was to hold incumbents to account, particularly in divisions with large Muslim communities where it felt it would have greater impact.
He said the group had “very consciously” placed the Liberals higher than Labor in the seat for “strategic purposes” and that it believed its flipping would have a “net impact of zero”, with the group hoping to help flip some Liberal seats.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73421
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22964070 (280912ZAPR25) Notable: Chinese envoy demands Australia stands with Beijing over US ‘bully’ - China’s ambassador to Australia claims US President Donald Trump is turning the world of international trade into a “lawless jungle”, and is demanding Anthony Albanese and Peter Dutton stand with Beijing against the “bullying” of the White House’s tariff war. As Mr Trump moved to strike a deal with China and ease fears of a damaging global economic crisis, Beijing’s envoy Xiao Qian told Australia’s leaders the US-Australia alliance does not give the Trump administration a “free pass” on trade. Mr Xiao writes in The Australian that Beijing is ready to stand up to Washington, and suggests Australia as an independent nation should join the Chinese. “Faced with unilateral bullying, China will resolutely stand its ground, not only to safeguard its legitimate rights and interests but also to prevent the world from descending into a lawless “jungle” where might makes right,” Mr Xiao writes. “Both China and Australia are important countries in the Asia-Pacific region and beneficiaries as well as upholders of the multilateral system and free trade. Amidst the changing international landscape, China stands ready to work with all parties to resolutely oppose all forms of hegemony and bullying, firmly uphold the UN-centred international system and the international order based on international law, and contribute to the prosperity and stability of the region and the world at large.”
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>51054 (pb)
>>51055 (pb)
>>51056 (pb)
Chinese envoy demands Australia stands with Beijing over US ‘bully’
GEOFF CHAMBERS and RICHARD FERGUSON - April 24, 2025
1/2
China’s ambassador to Australia claims US President Donald Trump is turning the world of international trade into a “lawless jungle”, and is demanding Anthony Albanese and Peter Dutton stand with Beijing against the “bullying” of the White House’s tariff war.
As Mr Trump moved to strike a deal with China and ease fears of a damaging global economic crisis, Beijing’s envoy Xiao Qian told Australia’s leaders the US-Australia alliance does not give the Trump administration a “free pass” on trade.
The ambassador’s latest intervention a week out from the election comes as Australians turn against the US, and as they also warn the government is allowing too much Chinese investment in this country.
New polling data revealed in an SEC Newgate State of Trade research report shows the US has fallen behind China and is now ahead only of Russia in terms of Australians’ negative views on the nation’s relationships with other countries.
Mr Xiao writes in The Australian that Beijing is ready to stand up to Washington, and suggests Australia as an independent nation should join the Chinese.
“Faced with unilateral bullying, China will resolutely stand its ground, not only to safeguard its legitimate rights and interests but also to prevent the world from descending into a lawless “jungle” where might makes right,” Mr Xiao writes.
“Both China and Australia are important countries in the Asia-Pacific region and beneficiaries as well as upholders of the multilateral system and free trade.
“Amidst the changing international landscape, China stands ready to work with all parties to resolutely oppose all forms of hegemony and bullying, firmly uphold the UN-centred international system and the international order based on international law, and contribute to the prosperity and stability of the region and the world at large.”
During the May 3 election campaign, the Prime Minister and the Opposition Leader have pledged to diversify Australia’s trade relationships, forge closer ties to Indo-Pacific allies and stand up to Mr Trump.
The Australian understands both men will make it a priority to visit Washington DC and sit down with Mr Trump if they win the election.
Mr Trump on Thursday said he expected to strike a deal with Beijing over the next few weeks, which would lead to lower tariffs between the US and China.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73422
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22964078 (280915ZAPR25) Notable: COMMENTARY: America’s tariffs are turning the world back to ‘law of the jungle’ - "Recently, the United States has indiscriminately imposed tariffs on all its trading partners, coercing them into initiating so-called “reciprocal tariff” negotiations and demanding each country make significant concessions. The international community must remain highly vigilant against such actions. If the US is allowed to act with impunity, the world will revert to the “law of the jungle” where the strong prey on the weak, and all countries will become victims. Today, the US, obsessed with the supremacy of power, brazenly imposes tariffs on the entire world, pursues hegemonic politics and unilateral bullying in the economic and trade fields, and places American interests above the common interests of the international community, making the entire world, including its “allies” and “partners”, pay the price for its selfishness. This has subverted the existing international rules and order, and will bring the international community back to the “law of the jungle”, with small and weak countries bearing the brunt of the consequences. China is a steadfast defender of multilateralism and the international rules-based order, consistently advocating for the resolution of differences through dialogue and negotiation. However, the US, wielding the “big stick”, has indiscriminately imposed exorbitant tariffs on countries around the world. Both China and Australia are important countries in the Asia-Pacific region and beneficiaries as well as upholders of the multilateral system and free trade. History has repeatedly proven that a powerful country is not an almighty talisman, and alliance is not a free pass. On issues concerning principles and fundamental national interests, only by making independent decisions based on the interests of one’s own country and people can a nation secure a brighter future." - Xiao Qian, China’s ambassador to Australia - theaustralian.com.au
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73421
COMMENTARY: America’s tariffs are turning the world back to ‘law of the jungle’
Xiao Qian, Ambassador of the People's Republic of China to Australia - April 24, 2025
Recently, the United States has indiscriminately imposed tariffs on all its trading partners, coercing them into initiating so-called “reciprocal tariff” negotiations and demanding each country make significant concessions.
The international community must remain highly vigilant against such actions. If the US is allowed to act with impunity, the world will revert to the “law of the jungle” where the strong prey on the weak, and all countries will become victims.
Eighty years ago, drawing painful lessons from World War II and proceeding from the common interests of all mankind, countries around the world promoted the establishment of the United Nations, explicitly stipulating that collective action should be taken to prevent war, resolve disputes, and promote economic and social development.
Over the past 80 years, with the concerted efforts of all countries, we have established an international system with the United Nations at its core and an international order based on international law. This has enabled every country, whether poor and weak or wealthy and powerful, to participate in international competition and co-operation on an equal footing, thereby it has promoted the common development of all mankind.
Today, the US, obsessed with the supremacy of power, brazenly imposes tariffs on the entire world, pursues hegemonic politics and unilateral bullying in the economic and trade fields, and places American interests above the common interests of the international community, making the entire world, including its “allies” and “partners”, pay the price for its selfishness.
This has subverted the existing international rules and order, and will bring the international community back to the “law of the jungle”, with small and weak countries bearing the brunt of the consequences.
In the face of hegemony, appeasement and compromise will only be like bargaining with a tiger for its hide. And excessive concessions will only embolden the other side, ultimately leading to a lose-lose outcome and failing to resolve the issue.
Only by resolutely opposing all forms of unilateralism and protectionism can we uphold our international commitments and earn the respect of the global community. Only by firmly supporting the multilateral trading system can we safeguard the international rules-based order.
China is a steadfast defender of multilateralism and the international rules-based order, consistently advocating for the resolution of differences through dialogue and negotiation. However, the US, wielding the “big stick”, has indiscriminately imposed exorbitant tariffs on countries around the world.
This is a move to set preconditions for talks and undermines the fairness and integrity of negotiations. Faced with unilateral bullying, China will resolutely stand its ground, not only to safeguard its legitimate rights and interests but also to prevent the world from descending into a lawless “jungle” where might makes right.
China is the world’s second-largest consumer market and home to the largest middle-income group globally, boasting enormous potential for investment and consumption. Committed to high-quality development, China is accelerating its green, digital and intelligent transformation.
With strong industrial supporting capabilities, it offers the best application scenarios for the new round of technological revolution and industrial transformation.
This year, China’s macroeconomic policies have fully accounted for various uncertainties. It has ample reserve policy tools to effectively counter external adverse impacts and sustain its own healthy and stable economic growth. We are fully confident in this regard.
Both China and Australia are important countries in the Asia-Pacific region and beneficiaries as well as upholders of the multilateral system and free trade. History has repeatedly proven that a powerful country is not an almighty talisman, and alliance is not a free pass. On issues concerning principles and fundamental national interests, only by making independent decisions based on the interests of one’s own country and people can a nation secure a brighter future.
Amid the changing international landscape, China stands ready to work with all parties to resolutely oppose all forms of hegemony and bullying, firmly uphold the UN-centred international system and the international order based on international law, and contribute to the prosperity and stability of the region and the world at large.
Xiao Qian is China’s ambassador to Australia.
https://www.theaustralian.com.au/commentary/americas-tariffs-are-turning-the-world-back-to-law-of-the-jungle/news-story/57aac791ffcfe5ec6503109066f2ba63
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73423
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22964082 (280917ZAPR25) Notable: COMMENTARY: Sorry, Ambassador Xiao Qian: Beijing is no defender of the free world - "If hypocrisy had a house style, the Chinese ambassador’s latest dispatch in these pages would be its template. Xiao Qian’s essay attacking the US measures the gulf between Beijing’s words and deeds in seven-league boots. In his telling, China is the guardian of global order. While there’s every reason to be disturbed about the recent actions of the US President, choosing a world run with Chinese characteristics demands a serious character check. The ambassador would have us believe Xi Jinping is a safer option than Trump. But it is not a real choice at all, only the illusion of one. There are still checks and balances on an American president; in China, only one man is truly free. Trump disrupts the order. Xi bends it to his will and wants to make us slaves to it. Xiao would have us forget what China has done and focus only on what it says. Perhaps he thinks we’re stupid and, as a close observer, probably sees our election campaign as proof of that point. No doubt the usual chorus of useful idiots will amplify the ambassador’s talking points. No doubt our government will run its usual lame line that we will co-operate where we can and disagree where we must, as China continues to push and we retreat. Still, it is good that Xiao was given space in a national newspaper to share his views. It exposes the strategy Beijing uses in every possible forum: take a sliver of truth, distort it and deploy it to undermine trust in open societies. And the courtesy of free speech might give the ambassador pause to consider this: in what Chinese paper would a foreign critic be given the same freedom? Where are the Chinese publications that dare to criticise the Communist Party? That is what makes our system and America’s better than his. The right to disagree isn’t punished with imprisonment or death. Some may see free speech as a small thing; I see it as the only thing that stands between us and tyranny. I am happy to see it extended even to someone who, if his world were realised, would take it from me. Chinese diplomats often season their rhetoric with Confucian platitudes, the moral maxims the Cultural Revolution once tried to erase from history. Here’s one from our side: the best predictor of future behaviour is past behaviour. But, frankly, that is too mild. In the days when China was hitting Australia with trade sanctions, there was talk of Beijing seeking a demonstration effect - a warning to other impudent countries – captured in an old idiom: kill the chicken to scare the monkey. In that spirit, I offer this ancient Australian riposte: I wouldn’t trust Beijing to run a chook raffle." - Chris Uhlmann - theaustralian.com.au''
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73421
>>73422
COMMENTARY: Sorry, Ambassador Xiao Qian: Beijing is no defender of the free world
CHRIS UHLMANN - April 27, 2025
1/2
If hypocrisy had a house style, the Chinese ambassador’s latest dispatch in these pages would be its template. Xiao Qian’s essay attacking the US measures the gulf between Beijing’s words and deeds in seven-league boots.
In his telling, China is the guardian of global order. While there’s every reason to be disturbed about the recent actions of the US President, choosing a world run with Chinese characteristics demands a serious character check.
So let’s kick the tyres on what ambassador Xiao is selling.
He opens by condemning US tariffs as “unilateral bullying” that risks a return to “the law of the jungle where the strong prey on the weak”.
Curious, then, that it was China that launched more than a dozen trade strikes against Australia for the crime of asking how Covid-19 began. Barley, wine, beef, lobster, coal, timber: all unilaterally sanctioned. No talks, no negotiation, no rules.
It is part of a pattern of punishment. Lithuania’s sin was to host a Taiwanese representative office. Result? Trade ties disappeared.
Norway awarded the Nobel Peace Prize to Liu Xiaobo. China retaliated with a diplomatic freeze and a trade war, slashing Norwegian exports and sending a message to the world: cross Beijing and you will pay.
Xiao claims to support the aims of international arbiters such as the UN in preventing war, resolving disputes and promoting development. So why is China ignoring a binding ruling from the Permanent Court of Arbitration that found its sweeping claims in the South China Sea illegal? Beijing condemned the verdict, built and militarised artificial islands, and now harasses ships and planes in international waters.
If there were a hall of fame for diplomatic irony, this would be carved above the door: “China is a steadfast defender of multilateralism and the international rules-based order.” This from a regime that expels journalists, censors the internet, imprisons dissenters and systematically shuts foreign companies out of key sectors of its domestic market.
In industries from technology to finance to green energy, China imposes licensing barriers, demands joint ventures and favours heavily subsidised national champions. Its longstanding strategy of forced technology transfer and industrial espionage, including cyber attacks by state-backed groups such as APT10 and Volt Typhoon, has targeted Western corporations, defence contractors and critical infrastructure. This isn’t order, it’s hybrid warfare.
Xiao accuses the US of hegemonic politics. But didn’t his government just send three warships to lap Australia, conducting live-fire drills off our east coast? Didn’t it plant a floating barrier in Scarborough Shoal to block Filipino fishermen? Didn’t it erect an illegal surveillance installation near Ieodo in South Korean waters? Didn’t it clash with Indian troops in the Himalayas, causing the first fatalities between the two countries in 45 years? Didn’t it escalate tensions with Japan in the East China Sea, routinely sending ships and aircraft into disputed waters? And isn’t it threatening to forcibly annex Taiwan?
Then there’s the line that appeasement only emboldens aggressors. Here, at last, Xiao says something true, and something the Albanese government would do well to ponder.
For decades the West placated China, believing integration would lead to liberalisation. We let it into the World Trade Organisation, offshored our factories and turned a blind eye to intellectual property theft and trade distortions. In return, China built a surveillance state, crushed Hong Kong, silenced dissent and prepared for war.
Xiao urges resistance to “unilateralism and protectionism”, a stirring call if it weren’t coming from one of the most protectionist economies on Earth. China manipulates its currency, demands technology transfers from foreign firms and subsidises entire industries, allowing them to flood global markets and kill competition. Solar panels, electric vehicles and batteries are all backed by, and in service of, the Chinese Communist Party.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73424
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22964101 (280928ZAPR25) Notable: Roberts-Smith’s appeal dealt blow after ‘fishing expedition’ cut down - Disgraced soldier Ben Roberts-Smith has suffered a blow to his plans to appeal against a defamation judgment which found he committed war crimes while on duty in Afghanistan. The former Special Air Service corporal sued the publisher of this newspaper, then known as Fairfax Media, and The Age and The Sydney Morning Herald investigative journalist Nick McKenzie, after a series of articles alleged Roberts-Smith carried out war crime murders while deployed with the SAS. The Federal Court dismissed the case in June 2023 when a judge found, to the civil standard of the balance of probabilities, that Roberts-Smith had committed multiple war crime murders, assaulted Afghans and engaged in a campaign of bullying against Australian troops a decade earlier. The Victoria Cross recipient appealed against the judgment and has been waiting for a decision for more than a year. Last month, he filed an application to reopen his appeal to introduce as evidence a recording of McKenzie speaking to a woman the famed soldier had an affair with, known in the trial as Person 17. In the call, McKenzie allegedly says Roberts-Smith’s ex-wife, Emma Roberts, and her close friend, Danielle Scott, were “actively briefing us on his legal strategy in respect of you”. Roberts-Smith’s legal team on Wednesday defended wide-ranging subpoenas they had issued to McKenzie, the journalist’s lawyers, Person 17, Roberts, Scott, and the ABC. “To say that (the recording) contents are shocking is an understatement,” Roberts-Smith’s lawyer Arthur Moses, SC, told the court. Moses called the subpoenas an attempt to follow “the ripples of a breach”. Nine’s lawyers opposed the subpoenas, characterising them as a “fishing expedition” which were too broad in scope and time-frame. On Thursday, Justice Nye Perram appeared to agree by striking out the vast bulk of Roberts-Smith’s requests for information. Eight of 10 categories of information sought from McKenzie were deleted.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>51002 (pb)
>>51003 (pb)
Roberts-Smith’s appeal dealt blow after ‘fishing expedition’ cut down
Perry Duffin - April 24, 2025
Disgraced soldier Ben Roberts-Smith has suffered a blow to his plans to appeal against a defamation judgment which found he committed war crimes while on duty in Afghanistan.
The former Special Air Service corporal sued the publisher of this newspaper, then known as Fairfax Media, and The Age and The Sydney Morning Herald investigative journalist Nick McKenzie, after a series of articles alleged Roberts-Smith carried out war crime murders while deployed with the SAS.
The Federal Court dismissed the case in June 2023 when a judge found, to the civil standard of the balance of probabilities, that Roberts-Smith had committed multiple war crime murders, assaulted Afghans and engaged in a campaign of bullying against Australian troops a decade earlier.
The Victoria Cross recipient appealed against the judgment and has been waiting for a decision for more than a year.
Last month, he filed an application to reopen his appeal to introduce as evidence a recording of McKenzie speaking to a woman the famed soldier had an affair with, known in the trial as Person 17.
In the call, McKenzie allegedly says Roberts-Smith’s ex-wife, Emma Roberts, and her close friend, Danielle Scott, were “actively briefing us on his legal strategy in respect of you”.
Roberts-Smith’s legal team on Wednesday defended wide-ranging subpoenas they had issued to McKenzie, the journalist’s lawyers, Person 17, Roberts, Scott, and the ABC.
“To say that (the recording) contents are shocking is an understatement,” Roberts-Smith’s lawyer Arthur Moses, SC, told the court.
Moses called the subpoenas an attempt to follow “the ripples of a breach”.
Nine’s lawyers opposed the subpoenas, characterising them as a “fishing expedition” which were too broad in scope and time-frame.
On Thursday, Justice Nye Perram appeared to agree by striking out the vast bulk of Roberts-Smith’s requests for information.
Eight of 10 categories of information sought from McKenzie were deleted.
Roberts-Smith’s attempts to gain information from the ABC about a Media Watch episode dealing with the case, hosted by journalist Linton Besser, were also set aside.
Subpoenas to Person 17, Roberts and Scott were also denied by Justice Perram.
Nine’s lawyers, Peter Bartlett and Dean Levitan, also had the bulk of subpoenas against them set aside.
The surviving subpoenas include communications and meeting notes between McKenzie and Nine’s lawyers with Scott and Roberts, but have been narrowed to smaller windows of time measured in months, rather than years.
McKenzie is still expected to give evidence next week in a hearing which will decide if Roberts-Smith can reopen his appeal on the grounds of a miscarriage of justice.
It means McKenzie will be subjected to cross-examination, which would be likely to focus on the secret recording and his alleged receipt of the leaked legal strategy from Roberts-Smith’s former confidants.
A Nine spokesperson previously said McKenzie and his journalism has the company’s full support.
https://www.theage.com.au/national/nsw/roberts-smith-s-appeal-dealt-blow-after-fishing-expedition-cut-down-20250424-p5lu0w.html
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73425
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22964102 (280931ZAPR25) Notable: ‘Sneering and supercilious’: Reporter Nick McKenzie takes stand against Ben Roberts-Smith’s silk - When Nick McKenzie walks into the witness box of the Federal Court on Thursday to testify in what may be the most consequential moment of his career, all eyes will turn to the rear of the court to see if his nemesis, Ben Roberts-Smith, has arrived at his favourite window seat. The Victoria Cross recipient, who attended almost every day of his defamation trial against the Nine newspapers, has not appeared at any of the hearings in his appeal against judge Anthony Besanko’s finding that he was a war criminal. But the prospect of seeing the tables turned against McKenzie, the investigative reporter whose sleuthing led to his downfall, may prove too tempting. The 11th-hour bid to reopen the appeal is the endgame in a titanic struggle between Australia’s most decorated soldier and its most decorated journalist: the recipient of the Victoria Cross for conspicuous gallantry locked in combat with the winner of 16 Walkley Awards, the country’s highest journalism honour. And now on the table: the possible upending of the country’s biggest and most expensive defamation case. McKenzie never took the stand in the defamation trial, but now, after a secret recording suggested he obtained what Roberts-Smith says is privileged information about his legal strategy, the reporter has chosen to confront the allegation head-on. It’s a bold but risky move by the highly respected McKenzie. Friends say he is anxious to present his side of the story and confident he will be shown to have acted ethically, despite his secretly recorded comments. He will argue that none of the information he received from Roberts-Smith’s ex-wife Emma Roberts and her best friend Danielle Scott was legally privileged. But giving evidence means also exposing himself to cross-examination by the former soldier’s lawyer. And not just any lawyer: Arthur Moses, the fearsome Sydney silk who was on the losing side of the defamation case.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73424
‘Sneering and supercilious’: Reporter Nick McKenzie takes stand against Ben Roberts-Smith’s silk
STEPHEN RICE - 27 April 2025
1/2
When Nick McKenzie walks into the witness box of the Federal Court on Thursday to testify in what may be the most consequential moment of his career, all eyes will turn to the rear of the court to see if his nemesis, Ben Roberts-Smith, has arrived at his favourite window seat.
The Victoria Cross recipient, who attended almost every day of his defamation trial against the Nine newspapers, has not appeared at any of the hearings in his appeal against judge Anthony Besanko’s finding that he was a war criminal. But the prospect of seeing the tables turned against McKenzie, the investigative reporter whose sleuthing led to his downfall, may prove too tempting.
The 11th-hour bid to reopen the appeal is the endgame in a titanic struggle between Australia’s most decorated soldier and its most decorated journalist: the recipient of the Victoria Cross for conspicuous gallantry locked in combat with the winner of 16 Walkley Awards, the country’s highest journalism honour.
And now on the table: the possible upending of the country’s biggest and most expensive defamation case.
McKenzie never took the stand in the defamation trial, but now, after a secret recording suggested he obtained what Roberts-Smith says is privileged information about his legal strategy, the reporter has chosen to confront the allegation head-on.
It’s a bold but risky move by the highly respected McKenzie. Friends say he is anxious to present his side of the story and confident he will be shown to have acted ethically, despite his secretly recorded comments.
He will argue that none of the information he received from Roberts-Smith’s ex-wife Emma Roberts and her best friend Danielle Scott was legally privileged.
But giving evidence means also exposing himself to cross-examination by the former soldier’s lawyer. And not just any lawyer: Arthur Moses, the fearsome Sydney silk who was on the losing side of the defamation case.
There is no love lost between the journalist and the barrister. In his book about the case, Crossing the Line, McKenzie is damning of Moses, describing him as “sneering and supercilious” and suggesting his cross-examination of some witnesses was “ineffectual” and actually helped Nine’s case.
In court last week, Moses tore into McKenzie’s conduct, claiming his answers to the allegations in an affidavit were “a pyramid of lies” and accused him of throwing his own lawyers under the bus by asserting that he had given them all the information he had obtained but had not been warned some of it might be privileged.
Moses suggested “there’s going to be a contest” between McKenzie on the one hand and the lawyers on the other. “It’s probably a reason why they’ve got separate representation,” Moses said. Peter Bartlett is now represented by Tom Blackburn SC, and Dean Levitan by Nicholas Bender SC.
Nine has lost the services of Nicholas Owens, its senior counsel in the defamation trial and now a Federal Court judge, who at one point Moses had suggested might also be called upon to testify over his knowledge of these matters, a bid he has abandoned.
McKenzie goes into the witness box backed by a relatively new legal team, headed by John Sheahan KC, who is less familiar with the intricate details of the case than Moses and his instructing solicitor, Monica Allen, now of BlackBay Lawyers, who have both been on Roberts-Smith’s team from the start.
Nine is fighting hard to keep Bartlett and Levitan out of the witness box and it would be surprising if Moses succeeds in that bid.
However, if he fails, he can ask the court to draw inferences from their lack of evidence, as neither has put on affidavits in the case.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73426
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22964124 (280942ZAPR25) Notable: Video: Violent clashes in Melbourne after protesters descend on women’s rights rally - Out-of-control violence has marred busy CBD streets after protesters, who were left unaccompanied by police, clashed with passersby following earlier skirmishes with law enforcement in which four officers were injured. Earlier on Saturday, trans-rights activists and police clashed as protesters roamed the city after gathering to disrupt a women’s rights rally. Pro-trans protesters moved through the streets from Parliament House, where they played drums and chanted at the Women Will Speak event on the steps outside Victoria’s parliament earlier in the day. About 50 people attended the Women Will Speak event, which drew about 440 protesters, according to Victoria Police. “Around 40 people then conducted a march across the CBD, blocking intersections with wooden pallets and swarming local retailers,” police said in a statement. Major intersections, including the corner of Collins and Swanston streets, were blocked while demonstrators chanted anti-police sentiment and pro-trans slogans. Shouts of “quit your job” and “defund the police” could be heard as dozens of police formed lines to try to control the group’s movements. Melbourne’s Women Will Speak rally is part of the global Let Women Speak movement, which argues that laws promoting trans inclusion have eroded sex-based rights and intruded unreasonably into women’s spaces. It follows this month’s UK Supreme Court ruling, which decreed that for the purposes of Britain’s Equality Act, a woman is defined by her biological sex. Before the rally, Victoria Police enacted special search-and-arrest powers to deter neo-Nazis from gatecrashing the women’s rights rally and planned counter-protest by trans activists.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>51073 (pb)
>>51074 (pb)
>>51075 (pb)
>>51076 (pb)
Violent clashes in Melbourne after protesters descend on women’s rights rally
Brittany Busch - April 26, 2025
1/2
Out-of-control violence has marred busy CBD streets after protesters, who were left unaccompanied by police, clashed with passersby following earlier skirmishes with law enforcement in which four officers were injured.
Earlier on Saturday, trans-rights activists and police clashed as protesters roamed the city after gathering to disrupt a women’s rights rally.
Pro-trans protesters moved through the streets from Parliament House, where they played drums and chanted at the Women Will Speak event on the steps outside Victoria’s parliament earlier in the day. About 50 people attended the Women Will Speak event, which drew about 440 protesters, according to Victoria Police.
“Around 40 people then conducted a march across the CBD, blocking intersections with wooden pallets and swarming local retailers,” police said in a statement.
Major intersections, including the corner of Collins and Swanston streets, were blocked while demonstrators chanted anti-police sentiment and pro-trans slogans.
Shouts of “quit your job” and “defund the police” could be heard as dozens of police formed lines to try to control the group’s movements.
Police deployed pepper spray at the crowd, some protesters were detained, and another fell to the ground, appearing injured, as police tried to corral the throng.
Victoria Police said four officers were injured and two people were arrested. The organisation said the 37-year-old Brunswick woman and 41-year-old Footscray man were released with intent to summons.
Officers held their lines at the intersection of Swanston and Collins streets and the protesters moved away unaccompanied, north along Swanston Street.
As hundreds of people spilled from halted trams near the intersection, some passersby verbally confronted the protesters.
Violence broke out again a short time later outside Melbourne Central when a woman shouted at the demonstrators to move and stop blocking people “trying to get home”.
The woman put her bag down and approached some of the protesters, who threw water on her and a fight broke out. Others tried to stop the scuffle.
Some witnesses clapped for the woman as she walked away, before she picked up her bag and swung it at the activists.
Yarra Trams staff could be seen monitoring the scene and directing the movement of trams, but police were not present at that point.
A group of young men followed the protesters to the State Library lawn, yelling “f*ck trans rights”. The two groups clashed, and the activists chased the men down Swanston Street and into a small alley.
Victoria Police was asked to comment about why the demonstration was allowed to continue without police intervention.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73427
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22964138 (280954ZAPR25) Notable: Talisman Sabre -Magic Sword- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G02wKufX3nw - https://qalerts.pub/?q=Operation+Specialists - https://qalerts.pub/?q=magic
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Talisman Sabre 2025 is coming from 13 July – 04 August 2025
Asia Pacific Defence Reporter - 23/04/2025
Australia will host the largest ever Exercise Talisman Sabre from 13 July to 4 August 2025 with over 30,000 military personnel from 19 nations set to participate in activities across Australia, and for the first time, in Papua New Guinea. Now in its 11th iteration, Talisman Sabre is the largest bilateral combined training activity between the Australian Defence Force and the United States military, reflecting the closeness of our Alliance.
Participating partner nations in Talisman Sabre 2025 also include Canada, Fiji, France, Germany, India, Indonesia, Japan, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Papua New Guinea, the Philippines, the Republic of Korea, Singapore, Thailand, Tonga, and the United Kingdom. Brunei, Malaysia and Vietnam will also attend as observers.
Talisman Sabre 2025 will focus on multi-domain warfighting. Key activities will include amphibious and airborne lodgements, firepower demonstrations, and combat across land, air, sea, space and cyber domains. The logistics for preparing, staging, integrating and moving forces to and around Australia are the most complex ever undertaken for a Talisman Sabre. The activities are scheduled to take place right across the nation, including Queensland, Western Australia, the Northern Territory, New South Wales and on Christmas Island.
For the first time ever, Papua New Guinea will also host an activity, highlighting the growing capabilities and interoperability with Pacific partners as Papua New Guinea marks its 50th Anniversary of Independence.
Chief of Joint Operations, Vice Admiral Justin Jones, said: “Talisman Sabre demonstrates our enduring Alliance with the United States, through deepening cooperation in training and force integration. It is a key opportunity to work with our partners from across the region and around the globe, demonstrating our combined capability to achieve large-scale operational outcomes together. As well as welcoming the largest ever contingent of partner nations, Australia is also excited to be holding part of this year’s exercise in Papua New Guinea. This is an important demonstration of the deepening integration between Australia and Papua New Guinea’s Defence Forces.”
Talisman Sabre Exercise Director, Brigadier Damian Hill, said: “This year’s exercise will demonstrate our ability to receive large volumes of personnel and equipment into Australia from across the Indo-Pacific, to stage, integrate and move them forward into the large exercise area. Considerable planning has gone into a safe and productive exercise for all participants. Talisman Sabre 2025 will be held across a range of Defence and non-Defence training areas throughout northern Australia. I thank the traditional owners, landowners, state authorities, and key community stakeholders who have helped us develop a safe and productive exercise for all participating nations.”
https://asiapacificdefencereporter.com/australia-hosting-exercise-talisman-sabre/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DBVBgSPCLPc
https://www.defence.gov.au/defence-activities/exercises/talisman-sabre
Talisman Sabre.
Magic Sword.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G02wKufX3nw
https://qalerts.pub/?q=Operation+Specialists
https://qalerts.pub/?q=magic
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73428
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22968774 (290831ZAPR25) Notable: Video: Group with historical CCP links ‘required’ Chinese Australians to vote for Ryan - Volunteers wearing Monique Ryan campaign T-shirts have been captured on video saying a community organisation, which has historical links to the Chinese Communist Party’s foreign influence operation, told them to vote for the teal MP. In the footage, a woman says the instruction came from Ji Jianmin, who is the president of the Hubei Association, an organisation representing people from the Chinese province that has also been accused of working with the United Front Work Department, a central party agency that advances CCP interests at home and abroad. Australia had a major reckoning with allegations of Chinese influence operations late last decade, prompting Malcolm Turnbull’s government to introduce foreign interference laws and making MPs more cautious about working with diaspora groups linked to foreign powers. In a video taken by Tharini Rouwette, who runs a group called COMPELL that advances multiculturalism in Australian politics, and uploaded to a Kooyong community Facebook group on April 22, two people wearing Ryan T-shirts claim Ji told them to vote for Ryan. “The Hubei Association President Ji Jianmin, how should I say this, he required us Chinese diaspora to support her,” says one of the Ryan volunteers, whose name is given only as Jessica. Another volunteer in the video, Stephen, adds: “Monique [Ryan] is an independent federal MP, her policies are quite suited to the needs of us Chinese diaspora. It feels like she can give a voice to us, so we want to support her.” The video has since been deleted from Facebook but remains on TikTok.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73415
>>73417
>>73421
Watch: Group with historical CCP links ‘required’ Chinese Australians to vote for Ryan
Paul Sakkal and Cindy Yin - April 28, 2025
1/2
Volunteers wearing Monique Ryan campaign T-shirts have been captured on video saying a community organisation, which has historical links to the Chinese Communist Party’s foreign influence operation, told them to vote for the teal MP.
In the footage, a woman says the instruction came from Ji Jianmin, who is the president of the Hubei Association, an organisation representing people from the Chinese province that has also been accused of working with the United Front Work Department, a central party agency that advances CCP interests at home and abroad.
Australia had a major reckoning with allegations of Chinese influence operations late last decade, prompting Malcolm Turnbull’s government to introduce foreign interference laws and making MPs more cautious about working with diaspora groups linked to foreign powers.
Ji’s alleged endorsement of Ryan, and the MP’s decision to attend an event hosted by another one of his organisations earlier this month, raise questions about Beijing’s ongoing interest in Australia’s election after Liberal identities, including Peter Dutton, were forced to distance themselves from a CCP-linked figure they were photographed with in February.
In a video taken by Tharini Rouwette, who runs a group called COMPELL that advances multiculturalism in Australian politics, and uploaded to a Kooyong community Facebook group on April 22, two people wearing Ryan T-shirts claim Ji told them to vote for Ryan.
“The Hubei Association President Ji Jianmin, how should I say this, he required us Chinese diaspora to support her,” says one of the Ryan volunteers, whose name is given only as Jessica.
Another volunteer in the video, Stephen, adds: “Monique [Ryan] is an independent federal MP, her policies are quite suited to the needs of us Chinese diaspora. It feels like she can give a voice to us, so we want to support her.”
The video has since been deleted from Facebook but remains on TikTok.
In a statement, Ryan’s spokeswoman confirmed one of the volunteers signed up to campaign against Liberal opponent Amelia Hamer after an April 21 dinner organised by another group Ji leads, but distanced the MP from Ji.
“On April 21st, Monique attended a community dinner hosted by the Hubei Chamber of Commerce, which Mr Ji Jianmin also attended,” the spokeswoman said.
“Following the event, some attendees, including Stephen – one of the people in the video – signed up to volunteer. Monique has had no interaction with Stephen beyond being present at that dinner. Monique cannot confirm whether Jessica attended the dinner and, to her knowledge, she has not met her.
“They are not personally known to her. She is aware that they have handed out flyers at a pre-poll location in Kew, but has no knowledge of any further involvement in her campaign.”
Following publication of the video, Liberal campaign spokesman Senator James Paterson said the footage was disturbing and called on authorities to investigate.
“If confirmed, this would constitute an act of foreign interference in our democracy. Australian elections must be decided by Australians only. The Electoral Integrity Assurance Taskforce, led by the AEC and incorporating ASIO and the Australian Federal Police, must urgently investigate.”
Ji leads the Hubei Chamber of Commerce and the Australian Hubei Association, both of which are for people from the central Chinese province home to almost 60 million residents and the seventh-largest economy in the country. He also oversees the Huaxing Arts Group, which is a performing arts organisation.
The groups were formerly run by Tom “Mr Chinatown” Zhou, who was arrested and extradited to China in 2020 over suspected money laundering and corruption following an investigation by this masthead into Crown casino junkets. Zhou’s legal status is unclear, but the Herald Sun reported in 2023 that he was unlikely to be released for five years.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73429
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22968796 (290843ZAPR25) Notable: Video: Australian Electoral Commission refers Monique Ryan volunteers ‘Beijing links’ video to integrity taskforce - Australia’s election watchdog has referred a video involving Kooyong MP Monique Ryan’s campaign volunteers to a national taskforce for investigation, after footage emerged of volunteers saying they were directed to vote for her by groups accused of ties to Beijing’s foreign influence operations. A spokesperson for the Australian Electoral Commission said the agency had become aware of the footage when it was published on Monday and launched a review. “This includes referral for consideration by the Electoral Integrity Assurance Taskforce,” it said in a statement. “It is important to note that Australia has a secret ballot. Nobody knows how another individual votes. Your vote is your choice. We have also published advice to voters about influence in Australian elections, including a general reminder for all voters that every voter is responsible for making their own decision”. The taskforce is made up of officials from several government agencies, including the AEC, ASIO and the federal police. Earlier, Ms Ryan said she had herself referred to the AEC allegations that volunteers with alleged links to the Chinese Communist Party were directed to campaign for her.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73415
>>73417
>>73421
>>73428
Australian Electoral Commission refers Monique Ryan volunteers ‘Beijing links’ video to integrity taskforce
RHIANNON DOWN and MOHAMMAD ALFARES - 29 April 2025
1/2
Australia’s election watchdog has referred a video involving Kooyong MP Monique Ryan’s campaign volunteers to a national taskforce for investigation, after footage emerged of volunteers saying they were directed to vote for her by groups accused of ties to Beijing’s foreign influence operations.
A spokesperson for the Australian Electoral Commission said the agency had become aware of the footage when it was published on Monday and launched a review.
“This includes referral for consideration by the Electoral Integrity Assurance Taskforce,” it said in a statement.
“It is important to note that Australia has a secret ballot. Nobody knows how another individual votes. Your vote is your choice. We have also published advice to voters about influence in Australian elections, including a general reminder for all voters that every voter is responsible for making their own decision”.
The taskforce is made up of officials from several government agencies, including the AEC, ASIO and the federal police.
Earlier, Ms Ryan said she had herself referred to the AEC allegations that volunteers with alleged links to the Chinese Communist Party were directed to campaign for her.
In footage uploaded to a local Facebook group on April 22, two individuals wearing “Monique Ryan” campaign shirts claimed Ji Jianmin, president of the Hubei Association, had directed the Chinese diaspora to support the teal MP.
In the video, a volunteer named Jessica says: “The Hubei Association President Ji Jianmin, how should I say this, he required us Chinese diaspora to support her.”
Another volunteer who goes by the name Stephen adds: “Monique is an independent federal MP, her policies are quite suited to the needs of us Chinese diaspora. It feels like she can give a voice to us, so we want to support her.” The footage has since been deleted.
The Hubei Association has previously been accused of working with the United Front Department, a Chinese Communist Party agency tasked with advancing Beijing’s interests abroad.
The teal independent MP dismissed scrutiny over the video while raising concerns that a Christian sect had been campaigning for the Coalition.
Speaking outside a pre-polling site, Dr Ryan said the man in question had attended events and roundtables she had hosted for the Chinese community in her seat of Kooyong, but she had no direct relationship with him.
“I’ve never had a one-on-one meeting with him and I’ve never had his support in any direct way,” Dr Ryan told Sky News.
“In the interest of full transparency I’ve contacted the AEC and the Department of Parliamentary Services agency and given them the details I gave to The Age yesterday about my relationship with those volunteers and (man).”
Dr Ryan said she had worked hard to represent the Chinese-Australian community.
“I’m grateful for the support the Chinese Australians have given me in the last three years, and I’ve tried to work hard for the Chinese-Australian community in Kooyong,” Dr Ryan said.
“Twenty per cent of the constituents of Kooyong are Chinese-Australian, and they just have to be represented. I’ve tried to do that.
“I’m not sure about the interpretation of that video whether it’s accurate, but you know, certainly no one’s been compelled to volunteer for me, but I’m grateful for those people who’ve come out to volunteer on my campaign.”
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73430
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22968807 (290851ZAPR25) Notable: Coalition vow: more Pacific infrastructure loans to undercut Beijing - Peter Dutton is moving to distance himself from Donald Trump’s foreign aid cuts, pledging an extra $2bn in Pacific infrastructure loans to counter surging Chinese influence across the region. Coalition foreign affairs spokesman David Coleman said a Dutton government would lift the Australian Infrastructure Financing Facility for the Pacific’s loans ceiling from $3bn to $5bn to deliver a raft of economy-strengthening projects. The move comes as Beijing looks to take advantage of the Trump administration’s decision to axe USAID support for the developing world, including $388m a year for Pacific countries. It’s understood the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade has been modelling the impact of Australian foreign aid cuts in case a Dutton government decides to mimic the Trump policy. However, a senior Coalition source said there would be no reduction to development assistance for the Pacific in its final election costings to be released on Thursday. Mr Coleman said more Australian-funded loans to Pacific countries would undercut efforts by Australia’s adversaries to win over regional leaders. “Infrastructure financing has become yet another battleground for influence in our region,” he said. “A larger AIFFP under a Coalition government will work to further strengthen Australia’s partnerships with nations across the Pacific and Timor-Leste. “It will complement the defence, security and other economic ties which were at the core of the Coalition’s Pacific Step-up when last in government.” The AIFFP so far has issued about $1.1bn in loans, which would leave nearly $4bn available for new ports, airports, energy and telecommunications projects if the Coalition is elected. The Opposition Leader named China in Sunday’s leaders’ debate as the biggest threat to Australia’s national security.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73415
>>73421
Coalition vow: more Pacific infrastructure loans to undercut Beijing
BEN PACKHAM - 29 April 2025
Peter Dutton is moving to distance himself from Donald Trump’s foreign aid cuts, pledging an extra $2bn in Pacific infrastructure loans to counter surging Chinese influence across the region.
Coalition foreign affairs spokesman David Coleman said a Dutton government would lift the Australian Infrastructure Financing Facility for the Pacific’s loans ceiling from $3bn to $5bn to deliver a raft of economy-strengthening projects.
The move comes as Beijing looks to take advantage of the Trump administration’s decision to axe USAID support for the developing world, including $388m a year for Pacific countries.
It’s understood the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade has been modelling the impact of Australian foreign aid cuts in case a Dutton government decides to mimic the Trump policy.
However, a senior Coalition source said there would be no reduction to development assistance for the Pacific in its final election costings to be released on Thursday.
Mr Coleman said more Australian-funded loans to Pacific countries would undercut efforts by Australia’s adversaries to win over regional leaders.
“Infrastructure financing has become yet another battleground for influence in our region,” he said. “A larger AIFFP under a Coalition government will work to further strengthen Australia’s partnerships with nations across the Pacific and Timor-Leste.
“It will complement the defence, security and other economic ties which were at the core of the Coalition’s Pacific Step-up when last in government.”
The AIFFP so far has issued about $1.1bn in loans, which would leave nearly $4bn available for new ports, airports, energy and telecommunications projects if the Coalition is elected.
The Opposition Leader named China in Sunday’s leaders’ debate as the biggest threat to Australia’s national security.
“The biggest concern from our intelligence agencies and defence agency is in relation to the Communist Party of China, and they’re worried about conflict in our region,” he said.
“They’re worried about what that would do to … our trade, what it would do for our security settings, what we would need to do to respond to say a cyber attack on our country.”
Anthony Albanese said Beijing was seeking “to increase its influence in the region” but would not explicitly name China as a threat to the nation’s security. “I am the Prime Minister of a country and how you deal as prime minister is diplomatically, and that is what we continue to do,” he said.
Labor has pilloried the Pacific diplomacy of past Coalition governments, which was marred by fights over climate change and unguarded comments by Mr Dutton in 2015 in which he joked about rising sea levels.
“Every Pacific leader remembers him joking about water lapping at their doors,” Mr Albanese said last week. “For the Pacific Island neighbours, it’s not a joke, climate change, it’s something that is the entry fee to credibility in our region.”
Labor also blasted Coalition failures to head off China’s security agreement with Solomon Islands.
China has expanded its regional influence during Mr Albanese’s prime ministership, striking policing agreements with Vanuatu and Kiribati, and a strategic partnership agreement with the Cook Islands.
“The Pacific, and other near neighbours like Timor-Leste, must be at the core of Australian foreign policy,” Mr Coleman said in a recent foreign policy speech.
Development Intelligence Lab chief executive Bridi Rice said the withdrawal of US aid dollars, a looming reduction in US diplomatic posts and the Trump administration’s tariffs would deliver a blow to regional stability.
“For Australia, this may mean rising development costs without US co-funding, including on infrastructure,” she said. “More dangerously, it risks leaving a vacuum where populism, corruption and authoritarianism can flourish. Australia has no choice but to recalibrate.
“Regional development is now the frontline of diplomacy and national security, and we cannot afford to sit back.”
https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/coalition-vow-more-pacific-infrastructure-loans-to-undercut-beijing/news-story/98e456bc10f86d1b9dde81f69ce503ff
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73431
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22968833 (290911ZAPR25) Notable: Anthony Albanese ducks as Russian envoy goes on the offensive - Vladimir Putin’s top envoy to Indonesia said on Monday that Russia views Australia as a “non-friendly state” that sanctions its President and supplies money and armaments to Ukraine, as Anthony Albanese dodged questions over whether he knew about Moscow’s request to base long-range military aircraft in Papua before the election campaign kicked off. The comments came as the Prime Minister faced fresh questions over the issue, first reported by the respected Janes defence journal on April 14, after having previously sown doubt over whether Russia actually made the request. Asked on Monday whether he knew what Russia was asking for before the election campaign - as revealed in The Australian – he appeared to change tack, saying he would not be goaded into using intelligence for political gain. “What adults do on intelligence is receive them and not do it – conduct it through the media,” Mr Albanese said. “When it comes to intelligence, adults act like adults.” The Prime Minister also told Sydney radio 2GB his government had been “completely clear that the Indonesia government have said that this is not going to happen and, what’s more, my opponent verballed the President of Indonesia, an important country that we have an important diplomatic relationship with”. “Russia, of course, will engage in the sort of propaganda that tries to assert its influence,” he said. “The truth is that Russia is struggling to beat the brave people of Ukraine under President Zelenskyy - something my government has backed Ukraine everyday.”
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>51068 (pb)
>>51083 (pb)
>>73415
Anthony Albanese ducks as Russian envoy goes on the offensive
AMANDA HODGE and DIAN SEPTIARI - 29 April 2025''
1/2
Vladimir Putin’s top envoy to Indonesia said on Monday that Russia views Australia as a “non-friendly state” that sanctions its President and supplies money and armaments to Ukraine, as Anthony Albanese dodged questions over whether he knew about Moscow’s request to base long-range military aircraft in Papua before the election campaign kicked off.
The comments came as the Prime Minister faced fresh questions over the issue, first reported by the respected Janes defence journal on April 14, after having previously sown doubt over whether Russia actually made the request.
Asked on Monday whether he knew what Russia was asking for before the election campaign – as revealed in The Australian – he appeared to change tack, saying he would not be goaded into using intelligence for political gain. “What adults do on intelligence is receive them and not do it – conduct it through the media,” Mr Albanese said. “When it comes to intelligence, adults act like adults.”
The Prime Minister also told Sydney radio 2GB his government had been “completely clear that the Indonesia government have said that this is not going to happen and, what’s more, my opponent verballed the President of Indonesia, an important country that we have an important diplomatic relationship with”.
“Russia, of course, will engage in the sort of propaganda that tries to assert its influence,” he said. “The truth is that Russia is struggling to beat the brave people of Ukraine under President Zelenskyy – something my government has backed Ukraine everyday.”
The opposition has accused Mr Albanese of ducking and weaving over what it claims is evidence of a Russian campaign for influence in Indonesia, pointing to the two nations’ first bilateral naval drills last November and the Jakarta visit in February by Russian Security Council secretary Sergei Shoigu. Mr Albanese has previously compared Coalition demands for a briefing on the Russian request to wanting a briefing on the “faking” of the 1969 moon landing.
Indonesia has also recently joined the China and Russia-led BRICS developing nation grouping, while President Prabowo Subianto will in June make his second visit to Moscow since his February 2024 election victory.
The Australian understands the federal government was told soon after Mr Shoigu discussed the issue in February with Indonesian Defence Minister Sjafrie Sjamsoeddin that Moscow wanted to use Manuhua air base on Biak island north of Papua, 1300km from Darwin, to transit Russian military aircraft, reportedly Tupolev Tu-95 long-range bombers.
Indonesia, which has for decades maintained a non-aligned foreign policy, granted Moscow permission to use the base in 2017 for air surveillance. Biak is also the proposed location of a joint Indonesian-Russian satellite project. But the Janes report cites Indonesian officials as saying Russia is seeking to permanently base long-range aircraft out of Biak.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73432
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22968851 (290927ZAPR25) Notable: AUKUS Milestone: First Royal Australian Navy Enlisted Students Graduate Nuclear Power Training - The first eight enlisted sailors and five additional officers from the Royal Australian Navy graduated from the U.S. Navy’s Nuclear Power Training Unit (NPTU) Charleston as part of the Australia, United Kingdom, United States (AUKUS) trilateral security partnership. The graduates, who trained alongside U.S. Navy personnel, began the rigorous naval nuclear power training pipeline in October 2024. The curriculum encompassed a wide range of critical subjects, including mathematics, nuclear physics, reactor principles, and nuclear reactor technology. This achievement marks an important step in Australia’s development of a sovereign, conventionally armed, nuclear-powered submarine (SSN) fleet. “This graduation marks a significant step forward for our Navy,” said Royal Australian Navy Commodore Daniel Sutherland, Commander Submarine Force. “Having naval nuclear power-qualified officers, and now sailors, is critical in meeting our goal of operating conventionally armed, nuclear-powered submarines.” NPTU trains officers, enlisted Sailors and civilians for shipboard nuclear power plant operation and maintenance of surface ships and submarines in the U.S. Navy’s nuclear fleet. “I remain impressed with the quality of Australian submariners who come through the naval nuclear propulsion training pipeline,” said Capt. Robert Rose, Commander, NPTU Charleston. “Six officers previously completed prototype training, each performing exceptionally well. I fully expect these recent graduates, especially our first enlisted personnel, will excel in the fleet.” “The opportunity for our U.S. Navy students to train alongside their Australian counterparts is beneficial to both our countries’ Sailors,” said Master Chief Ed Jackson, Engineering Department Master Chief for Naval Reactors. “These Royal Australian Navy sailors will now transition to our submarines to continue their training and qualifications in operating naval nuclear propulsion plants.”
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50962 (pb)
AUKUS Milestone: First Royal Australian Navy Enlisted Students Graduate Nuclear Power Training
U.S. EMBASSY IN CANBERRA - APRIL 18, 2025
MT. PLEASANT, S.C. – The first eight enlisted sailors and five additional officers from the Royal Australian Navy graduated from the U.S. Navy’s Nuclear Power Training Unit (NPTU) Charleston as part of the Australia, United Kingdom, United States (AUKUS) trilateral security partnership.
The graduates, who trained alongside U.S. Navy personnel, began the rigorous naval nuclear power training pipeline in October 2024. The curriculum encompassed a wide range of critical subjects, including mathematics, nuclear physics, reactor principles, and nuclear reactor technology. This achievement marks an important step in Australia’s development of a sovereign, conventionally armed, nuclear-powered submarine (SSN) fleet.
“This graduation marks a significant step forward for our Navy,” said Royal Australian Navy Commodore Daniel Sutherland, Commander Submarine Force. “Having naval nuclear power-qualified officers, and now sailors, is critical in meeting our goal of operating conventionally armed, nuclear-powered submarines.”
NPTU trains officers, enlisted Sailors and civilians for shipboard nuclear power plant operation and maintenance of surface ships and submarines in the U.S. Navy’s nuclear fleet.
“I remain impressed with the quality of Australian submariners who come through the naval nuclear propulsion training pipeline,” said Capt. Robert Rose, Commander, NPTU Charleston. “Six officers previously completed prototype training, each performing exceptionally well. I fully expect these recent graduates, especially our first enlisted personnel, will excel in the fleet.”
“The opportunity for our U.S. Navy students to train alongside their Australian counterparts is beneficial to both our countries’ Sailors,” said Master Chief Ed Jackson, Engineering Department Master Chief for Naval Reactors. “These Royal Australian Navy sailors will now transition to our submarines to continue their training and qualifications in operating naval nuclear propulsion plants.”
The AUKUS partnership, initiated in September 2021 and formalized with the Optimal Pathway announcement in March 2023, is a strategic initiative to reestablish deterrence in the Indo-Pacific region.
The U.S. Naval Nuclear Propulsion Program is a joint Department of Navy and Department of Energy organization overseeing all aspects of naval nuclear propulsion, from research and design to training and maintenance. Naval Reactors harnesses the atom to safely, reliably, and affordably power a global fleet that enables unrivaled responsiveness, endurance, stealth, and warfighting capability. Throughout the program’s 76-year history they have operated 273 reactors, accumulated more than 7,700 reactor-years of safe operations and maintained an unrivaled record of over 178 million miles safely steamed on nuclear power.
Learn more at https://www.energy.gov/nnsa/missions/powering-navy
https://au.usembassy.gov/first-royal-australian-navy-enlisted-students-graduate-nuclear-power-training/
https://www.asa.gov.au/news/royal-australian-navy-celebrates-aukus-milestone-nptu-charleston
https://www.dvidshub.net/image/8982703/first-royal-australian-navy-enlisted-students-graduate-nuclear-power-training
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73433
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22973535 (300846ZAPR25) Notable: Australia will keep pushing US to drop Trump tariffs after court ruling, trade minister says - Australia will continue to push Donald Trump to abandon his administration’s tariff regime entirely, after a US court blocked the president’s “liberation day” tariffs from coming into effect. The Manhattan-based court of international trade said the US constitution gives the Congress exclusive powers to regulate commerce with other countries, and ruled that power was not superseded by the president’s self-declared “emergency” he cited to safeguard the US economy. The Trump White House filed an appeal against the judgment minutes after it was handed down. The regime imposed a 10% across-the-board tariff on all Australian imports to the US. Several specific products, including steel and aluminium, are subject to higher tariff rates, up to 25%, which are not impacted by the court’s ruling. The Australian trade minister, Don Farrell, said the Australian government would agitate for tariffs on Australian goods to be dumped entirely. “We will study this ruling of the US Federal Courts on reciprocal tariffs closely and note that they may be subject to further legal processes through the courts,” he said. “The Albanese Government has been consistent in the view that these tariffs on Australian imports into the US are unjustified,” Farrell said. “We will continue to engage and strongly advocate for the removal of tariffs.” The US court found Trump overstepped his authority by imposing across-the-board tariffs on imports from countries all over the world. Trump called the tariffs, announced on 2 April, America’s “liberation day”.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>51028 (pb)
>>73415
‘They are calling’: Trump confirms Albanese has been trying to speak to him
Michael Koziol - April 30, 2025
Washington: US President Donald Trump confirmed he is aware the Australian government has been trying to contact him to discuss trade – and that he is yet to take Prime Minister Anthony Albanese’s call.
“They are calling, and I will be talking to him, yes,” Trump told this masthead and Nine News on Tuesday (Wednesday AEST) when asked whether he would speak to the Australian prime minister.
Later, Albanese said if he won Saturday’s election, he would expect a phone call with Trump after. He told ABC radio on Wednesday morning he was not embarrassed by the president’s admission that he was not answering the phone.
“Not at all. It’s a light-hearted throwaway comment from the president,” Albanese said.
“I assure you I’m not staying up at night trying to ring anyone at the moment, I’m in an election campaign.
“I’m sure if we are successful [in the election], we will have a discussion after Saturday. We have a relationship, we’ve already had a couple of phone calls.”
Trump made the comments as he departed the White House for the US state of Michigan, where he held a rally marking his first 100 days back in office.
Albanese has been under pressure from Opposition Leader Peter Dutton over his failure to secure another phone call with the US president following their conversation in February.
During that call, Trump agreed to consider an exemption on tariffs for Australian steel and aluminium, but ultimately granted no country relief. Australia was also hit with a 10 per cent universal tariff in April, along with the United Kingdom and many other US allies.
Albanese described that decision as having no basis in logic and “not the act of a friend”.
At the most recent leaders’ debate, when asked whether he had Trump’s phone number, Albanese said he was not even sure the president had a mobile phone. Conversations between world leaders were arranged in advanced and took place in secure rooms with aides present, he said.
But Dutton remained critical. “I think the answer was ‘no’ there … We didn’t get it [Trump’s phone number],” he said.
Trump does have a mobile phone. Two journalists from The Atlantic magazine recently reported calling him on a Saturday morning in late March, while he was at his golf club in New Jersey, and he answered despite the number being unfamiliar. “Who’s calling?” he said.
Further detail has been sought from the White House about Trump’s reasons for declining Australia’s calls. An Australian government spokesperson said: “Engagement with the US administration will continue with our government, agencies and embassy officials continuing to advocate for zero tariffs.”
Earlier in the day, US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said he was responsible for trade deals with countries other than China and expected to strike “incredibly smart, incredibly thoughtful” deals all over the world.
“[Trump] understands if you make a deal with a country, and you give them the parts that they want and they need, they’re going to open their market,” he told CNBC television. “People won’t let us sell chicken, they won’t let us sell beef. It’s all nonsense.”
At a press conference, US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent refused to say whether the US was engaged in direct talks with China about tariffs amid the trade war between Washington and Beijing.
“I’m not going to get into the nitty-gritty of who’s talking to whom,” he said. “But … I believe that for the Chinese, these tariffs are unsustainable.”
https://www.smh.com.au/world/north-america/they-are-calling-trump-confirms-albanese-has-been-trying-to-speak-to-him-20250430-p5lv94.html
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vmWd3m13EtY
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73434
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22973536 (300852ZAPR25) Notable: Final campaign dash kicks off as Albanese sweats on last-minute Dutton suburban fightback - Both sides of politics are gearing up for a frenetic 72 hours of campaigning with Anthony Albanese visiting every state before election day amid Labor fears Peter Dutton is staging a last-minute recovery. Despite a reported slide in the Coalition's primary vote to levels that would have historically made victory impossible, speculation has emerged that disgruntled outer-urban voters are more likely to preference the Liberal party than in previous elections. John Scales, co-founder of polling company JWS Research, said disenchanted voters in commuter-belt working class suburbs are sceptical of both major parties. However, unlike in 2022 when around two-thirds of One Nation and other centre-right minority party voters put the Coalition ahead of Labor, they now look likely to break 80:20 or as much as 90:10 towards Mr Dutton. The findings are based on polling across more than a dozen seats, with samples of 800 voters apiece where respondents were given the names of candidates and pressed to nominate a preference for the major parties. Mr Scales said the findings - if borne out on Saturday — mean the Liberals can still win as many as 10 such seats despite a falling primary vote. Seats that may break as Mr Scales described include Ryan in Brisbane, Bullwinkel in Western Australia, and Whitlam and Werriwa in New South Wales. He said the drift towards a Coalition-friendly preference flows was not evident in inner-city or teal-held seats, where the split was a more traditional 66:33. "We're not saying [Dutton] can win, we're saying it's a lot closer than people think," Mr Scales told the ABC.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73415
Final campaign dash kicks off as Albanese sweats on last-minute Dutton suburban fightback
Jacob Greber and Jane Norman - 30 April 2025
1/2
Both sides of politics are gearing up for a frenetic 72 hours of campaigning with Anthony Albanese visiting every state before election day amid Labor fears Peter Dutton is staging a last-minute recovery.
Despite a reported slide in the Coalition's primary vote to levels that would have historically made victory impossible, speculation has emerged that disgruntled outer-urban voters are more likely to preference the Liberal party than in previous elections.
John Scales, co-founder of polling company JWS Research, said disenchanted voters in commuter-belt working class suburbs are sceptical of both major parties.
However, unlike in 2022 when around two-thirds of One Nation and other centre-right minority party voters put the Coalition ahead of Labor, they now look likely to break 80:20 or as much as 90:10 towards Mr Dutton.
The findings are based on polling across more than a dozen seats, with samples of 800 voters apiece where respondents were given the names of candidates and pressed to nominate a preference for the major parties.
Mr Scales said the findings — if borne out on Saturday — mean the Liberals can still win as many as 10 such seats despite a falling primary vote.
Seats that may break as Mr Scales described include Ryan in Brisbane, Bullwinkel in Western Australia, and Whitlam and Werriwa in New South Wales. He said the drift towards a Coalition-friendly preference flows was not evident in inner-city or teal-held seats, where the split was a more traditional 66:33.
"We're not saying [Dutton] can win, we're saying it's a lot closer than people think," Mr Scales told the ABC.
Sunday's Newspoll showed Labor continues to gather steam, with a two-party preferred lead of 52-48. The Coalition's national primary was 35 per cent, followed by Labor on 34 per cent, the Greens on 11 per cent, 8 per cent for One Nation and 12 per cent for all others.
Mr Dutton is set to get a boost from the Liberal Party's decision to preference One Nation second in the majority of electorates across the country, something the Pauline Hanson-led party has said it would reciprocate for the Coalition.
Labor fears Coalition comeback
Nervousness is growing across the political spectrum, with large swathes of undecided and disinterested voters tuning into the campaign for the first time, raising the risks of wild-card outcomes.
Former Scott Morrison chief political strategist Yaron Finkelstein said there was "still a long way to go and a lot of people are undecided".
The uncertainty of the 2025 election, he said, is akin to "where seawater meets freshwater — the brackish effect".
"Do voters move away from the majors or is there a safe harbour effect?"
Mr Albanese will begin his final push from Canberra on Wednesday, delivering his 11th National Press Club address before embarking on a final lap of the nation's toughest contests, stopping in all six states.
While Labor has entered the final stretch of the campaign with polls showing it has its nose in front of the Coalition, government strategists said they are determined to maintain momentum as the Liberals unleash a major advertising blitz across television and social media.
Among their chief fears is that Mr Dutton "could make a comeback" thanks to well-targeted advertising that reminds people about their disappointment over Labor's handling of inflation and declining living standards earlier in the term.
Pollsters and party pundits warn of a wide-range of potential outcomes on Saturday, from an expanded Labor majority to hung parliament in which Mr Dutton has the whip hand to form government.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73435
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22973546 (300903ZAPR25) Notable: Election 2025: Resurrected voice inevitable, says Penny Wong - Foreign Minister Penny Wong has suggested an Indigenous voice is inevitable and Australians will one day be incredulous there was ever an argument about it. In an episode of the Betoota Talks podcast released on Monday, Senator Wong said Anthony Albanese went ahead with the voice referendum in 2023 because “he is not a pull-the-pin kind of guy”, he thought it was the right thing to do and “a lot of First Nations leaders wanted the opportunity”. “I think we’ll look back on it in 10 years’ time and it’ll be a bit like marriage equality,” she said. “I always used to say, marriage equality, which took us such a bloody fight to get that done, and I thought, all this fuss. It’ll become something, it’ll be like, people go ‘did we even have an argument about that?’ “Like, kids today, or even adults today, barely kind of clock that it used to be an issue. Remember how big an issue that was in the culture wars? Blimey, just endless.” On October 14, 2023, 60.1 per cent of Australians voted no to an Indigenous advisory body enshrined in the Constitution. When Mr Albanese was questioned about the voice in the leaders debate, he repeated his long-stated position that he respects the outcome. Asked if he still believed in it, Mr Albanese replied: “It is gone.”
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73415
Election 2025: Resurrected voice inevitable, says Penny Wong
PAIGE TAYLOR - 29 April 2025
1/2
Foreign Minister Penny Wong has suggested an Indigenous voice is inevitable and Australians will one day be incredulous there was ever an argument about it.
In an episode of the Betoota Talks podcast released on Monday, Senator Wong said Anthony Albanese went ahead with the voice referendum in 2023 because “he is not a pull-the-pin kind of guy”, he thought it was the right thing to do and “a lot of First Nations leaders wanted the opportunity”.
“I think we’ll look back on it in 10 years’ time and it’ll be a bit like marriage equality,” she said. “I always used to say, marriage equality, which took us such a bloody fight to get that done, and I thought, all this fuss. It’ll become something, it’ll be like, people go ‘did we even have an argument about that?’
“Like, kids today, or even adults today, barely kind of clock that it used to be an issue. Remember how big an issue that was in the culture wars? Blimey, just endless.”
On October 14, 2023, 60.1 per cent of Australians voted no to an Indigenous advisory body enshrined in the Constitution.
When Mr Albanese was questioned about the voice in the leaders debate, he repeated his long-stated position that he respects the outcome. Asked if he still believed in it, Mr Albanese replied: “It is gone.”
Asked again for his personal view on the voice, he said: “We need to find different paths to affect reconciliation.”
Jim Chalmers also said Labor will not be reviving the Indigenous voice to parliament in a second term. The Treasurer was asked to rule out the prospect of an Indigenous voice to parliament in Labor’s second term.
“I think the Prime Minister has already done that,” Dr Chalmers told Channel 9. “You know, we’re looking forwards, not backwards. We were disappointed about the outcome back then, but we’ve been looking forwards and not backwards. And it’s not part of our agenda.”
It comes as the Returned Servicemen’s League in Western Australia said an acknowledgment of country would remain part of the dawn service in Perth – where a racist taunt from the crowd interrupted an Indigenous veteran as she spoke on Friday – so long as it continued to be apolitical and supported by members.
RSL state president Duncan Anderson, a sheep farmer from Donnybrook, south of Perth, agreed with Ben Wyatt, Australia’s first Indigenous treasurer, who on Tuesday backed welcome ceremonies but said some went too long and others veered into “political diatribe”.
“It’s true, some welcome to countries can be a bit political,” Mr Anderson said. “We want to avoid that. There is nothing more that we are trying to protect Anzac Day from than politics.”
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73436
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22973557 (300913ZAPR25) Notable: Election 2025: AEC refers Clare O’Neil to integrity taskforce over Chinese polling booth recruits - Australia’s election watchdog has confirmed it will refer allegations that the Hubei Association was planning to send out dozens of Chinese volunteers to Labor Minister Clare O’Neil and the Greens Party to a national taskforce for investigation. The taskforce is made up of officials from several government agencies, including the federal police, ASIO and the AEC. Cabinet minister Ms O’Neil has been embroiled in an election-eve controversy over Chinese campaign volunteers, with confirmation 10 individuals linked to an organisation associated with Beijing’s foreign influence operation were being recruited to staff her polling booths on election day. As part of their ongoing investigation into teal MP Monique Ryan’s campaign in Kooyong, the Australian Electoral Commission will review reporting of further irregularities concerning the Labor minister and a Greens candidate for the seat of Menzies. A spokesperson for the AEC said on Wednesday that the agency was aware of the latest developments after The Australian revealed the organisation had been planning to release more volunteers at polling booths to campaign for Labor and the Greens. “They will review all current reporting, and other available information, as part of what they’re looking into,” a spokesperson for the AEC said.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73415
>>73428
>>73429
Election 2025: AEC refers Clare O’Neil to integrity taskforce over Chinese polling booth recruits
MOHAMMAD ALFARES - 29 April 2025
1/2
Australia’s election watchdog has confirmed it will refer allegations that the Hubei Association was planning to send out dozens of Chinese volunteers to Labor Minister Clare O’Neil and the Greens Party to a national taskforce for investigation.
The taskforce is made up of officials from several government agencies, including the federal police, ASIO and the AEC. Cabinet minister Ms O’Neil has been embroiled in an election-eve controversy over Chinese campaign volunteers, with confirmation 10 individuals linked to an organisation associated with Beijing’s foreign influence operation were being recruited to staff her polling booths on election day.
As part of their ongoing investigation into teal MP Monique Ryan’s campaign in Kooyong, the Australian Electoral Commission will review reporting of further irregularities concerning the Labor minister and a Greens candidate for the seat of Menzies.
A spokesperson for the AEC said on Wednesday that the agency was aware of the latest developments after The Australian revealed the organisation had been planning to release more volunteers at polling booths to campaign for Labor and the Greens.
“They will review all current reporting, and other available information, as part of what they’re looking into,” a spokesperson for the AEC said.
O’Neil rushes to axe Chinese recruits at her polling booths
The Australian can reveal Chinese-Australian Labor Party member Chap Chow, who describes himself as a “friend” of the minister he ass been “helping out”, organised with the Hubei Association in the past week to recruit volunteers for her electorate of Hotham.
But in a sudden about-face, Mr Chow contacted Hubei Association president Ji Jianmin on Tuesday morning – after news of its volunteers being involved in teal MP Monique Ryan’s Kooyong campaign broke, prompting the Australian Electoral Commission to order a federal investigation – to cancel the 10 volunteers.
Mr Ji told The Australian he was a supporter of Dr Ryan. “I think she represents our community quite well. I do like Monique Ryan. I feel like she’s a good community representative,” he said.
The Hubei Association has previously been accused of working with the United Front Department, a Chinese Communist Party agency tasked with spreading Beijing’s message overseas.
Labor has distanced itself from the plan to recruit the Hubei volunteers, describing it as an initiative from Mr Chow, who operates as a link between Melbourne’s Chinese community and the ALP.
Responding to a series of questions from The Australian, Ms O’Neil said in a statement about the offer of help from Hubei volunteers: “This organisation contacted my office earlier this week through an intermediary to offer volunteers, and my team politely declined.”
While Ms O’Neil suggested the contact had come from the Hubei Association, Mr Ji said the initial contact had come from her office.
Mr Chow said he had been in discussions with Hubei to recruit the volunteers and confirmed the plan was dumped on Tuesday. “Yes I did (cancel the request) this morning because of the media reports,” Mr Chow said. “That was the right thing to do after the media reports.
“I’m a friend of hers (Ms O’Neil), we’ve been friends for many years and I’ve helped her out in past elections.”
In an interview conducted face-to-face with an interpreter, Mr Ji told The Australian that under the original plan 10 volunteers from his organisation were going to volunteer for Ms O’Neil. “Labor candidate Clare O’Neil’s office originally contacted Jimmy’s office for 10 volunteers for the election day on May 3,” the interpreter said.
“That was the original request, but this morning Jimmy received a message from her office that they are no longer needed because of the media reports. Jimmy said it was OK but was disappointed.”
Mr Ji also revealed the Greens had been in contact with Hubei.
“The Greens requested 10 volunteers as well. They are ongoing and four are currently campaigning, handing out flyers in the Menzies electorate,” he said.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73437
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22973571 (300928ZAPR25) Notable: Cyclist injured in Blairgowrie crash with Daniel Andrews pockets secret out-of-court settlement - A cyclist struck by Daniel and Catherine Andrews’ SUV has pocketed a secret out-of-court settlement worth several hundreds of thousands of dollars. The Herald Sun can reveal major law firm Slater & Gordon has agreed to hand over the massive payout to Ryan Meuleman just weeks before an explosive Supreme Court trial was due to begin. Ryan’s lawyer, Marcus Clarke KC, confirmed a confidential settlement had been reached over the family’s claim that the Labor-aligned law firm failed to act in his best interests in the aftermath of the crash. “In the end he received an offer too good to refuse,” Mr Clarke said. “I am pleased for Ryan. He now has closure in relation to his claim against Slater & Gordon.” But the “bike boy” dispute is far from over, with the Meuleman family moving to pursue the former Victorian premier and his wife directly through the courts over the near-fatal 2013 crash. “I’ve been telling the truth since I was 15 years old,” Ryan said. “The people in the car are next. They shouldn’t get away with lying either.” Ryan’s father, Peter Meuleman, said: “My son has been called a liar since he was a teenager. Can you imagine what that does to a boy? The truth will now come out in the lawsuits against Andrews and his wife for defamation. Ryan isn’t stopping. Damning evidence has been covered up and ignored for a decade. It was always there to find.” Mr and Mrs Andrews were served with concerns notices in January - separate to the Slater & Gordon case - over statements they made following the release of a damning review of the crash conducted by the state’s former Assistant Commissioner for Traffic and Operations Dr Raymond Shuey.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Cyclist injured in Blairgowrie crash with Daniel Andrews pockets secret out-of-court settlement
A major law firm has agreed to hand over several hundreds of thousands of dollars to the cyclist struck by Daniel Andrews’ SUV, weeks before an explosive Supreme Court trial was due to begin.
Michael Warner - April 23, 2025
1/2
A cyclist struck by Daniel and Catherine Andrews’ SUV has pocketed a secret out-of-court settlement worth several hundreds of thousands of dollars.
The Herald Sun can reveal major law firm Slater & Gordon has agreed to hand over the massive payout to Ryan Meuleman just weeks before an explosive Supreme Court trial was due to begin.
Ryan’s lawyer, Marcus Clarke KC, confirmed a confidential settlement had been reached over the family’s claim that the Labor-aligned law firm failed to act in his best interests in the aftermath of the crash.
“In the end he received an offer too good to refuse,” Mr Clarke said.
“I am pleased for Ryan. He now has closure in relation to his claim against Slater & Gordon.”
But the “bike boy” dispute is far from over, with the Meuleman family moving to pursue the former Victorian premier and his wife directly through the courts over the near-fatal 2013 crash.
“I’ve been telling the truth since I was 15 years old,” Ryan said.
“The people in the car are next. They shouldn’t get away with lying either.”
Ryan’s father, Peter Meuleman, said: “My son has been called a liar since he was a teenager. Can you imagine what that does to a boy?
“The truth will now come out in the lawsuits against Andrews and his wife for defamation. Ryan isn’t stopping.
“Damning evidence has been covered up and ignored for a decade. It was always there to find.”
Mr and Mrs Andrews were served with concerns notices in January - separate to the Slater & Gordon case - over statements they made following the release of a damning review of the crash conducted by the state’s former Assistant Commissioner for Traffic and Operations Dr Raymond Shuey.
The Shuey review found that the Andrews’ Ford Territory was “travelling at speed” – on the wrong side of the road – and that Victoria Police had engaged in “an overt cover-up to avoid implicating a political figure in a life-threatening” incident.
It concluded that the police investigation, which supported the Andrews’ version of events, was “deeply flawed”, “unfounded” and “contrary to the available evidence”.
In a joint statement issued after the release of Dr Shuey’s review, the Andrews’ said: “This so-called report was commissioned by lawyers on behalf of their clients who are seeking money through the courts by suing their former lawyers.
“We are not a party to this legal action. We did nothing wrong. This matter has already been comprehensively and independently investigated and closed by Victoria Police and integrity agencies.
“We will not dignify these appalling conspiracy theories by commenting further at this time.”
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73438
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22973582 (300938ZAPR25) Notable: Video: Slater and Gordon reach settlement with Ryan Meuleman over 2013 crash with Dan Andrews’ vehicle - A cyclist left injured after a collision with former Victorian Premier Daniel Andrews’ car more than a decade ago has agreed to settle a lawsuit against his former law firm. Ryan Meuleman launched legal action against Slater and Gordon alleging it failed to act in his best interest when negotiating an $80,000 compensation settlement with the Transport Accident Commission. Mr Meuleman, who was 15 at the time, was seriously injured in January 2013 after colliding with the then-Labor opposition leader’s Ford Territory, which was being driven by his wife Catherine at Blairgowrie. Mr Andrews and the couple’s three children were in the car at the time. The family have consistently denied any wrongdoing, and no charges were laid following an investigation by Victoria Police. Mr Meuleman spent 11 days in hospital after the crash. He has alleged the car struck him, while the Andrews’ have repeatedly insisted the cyclist crashed into their car. On Wednesday, Mr Meuleman’s lawyer, Marcus Clarke KC, confirmed the lawsuit had been settled after Ryan received a confidential offer “too good to refuse”. Details of the settlement are confidential, however, in a statement, Mr Meuleman said it felt incredible to be “supported and believed”.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73437
Slater and Gordon reach settlement with Ryan Meuleman over 2013 crash with Dan Andrews’ vehicle
A teenage cyclist struck by ex-Premier Dan Andrews’ car has agreed to end a lawsuit against his former lawyers after receiving a settlement offer “too good to refuse”.
Liam Beatty - April 23, 2025
A cyclist left injured after a collision with former Victorian Premier Daniel Andrews’ car more than a decade ago has agreed to settle a lawsuit against his former law firm.
Ryan Meuleman launched legal action against Slater and Gordon alleging it failed to act in his best interest when negotiating an $80,000 compensation settlement with the Transport Accident Commission.
Mr Meuleman, who was 15 at the time, was seriously injured in January 2013 after colliding with the then-Labor opposition leader’s Ford Territory, which was being driven by his wife Catherine at Blairgowrie.
Mr Andrews and the couple’s three children were in the car at the time.
The family have consistently denied any wrongdoing, and no charges were laid following an investigation by Victoria Police.
Mr Meuleman spent 11 days in hospital after the crash.
He has alleged the car struck him, while the Andrews’ have repeatedly insisted the cyclist crashed into their car.
On Wednesday, Mr Meuleman’s lawyer, Marcus Clarke KC, confirmed the lawsuit had been settled after Ryan received a confidential offer “too good to refuse”.
Details of the settlement are confidential, however, in a statement, Mr Meuleman said it felt incredible to be “supported and believed”.
“For years, I never thought I could get here, where people are listening and want to know what really happened,” he said.
“I’ve got a bit of work to do on myself, and I can now afford some counselling which Mum and Dad reckon will be worth it. But to be honest, I feel good anyway, just knowing people care.”
Mr Meuleman has previously suggested he could launch defamation action against the Andrews family to pursue the truth of what happened that day, saying they “should have owned up to it years ago”.
Mr and Mrs Andrews were not party to Mr Meuleman’s case against Slater and Gordon.
How police handled the investigation was later subject to a probe by the independent Broad-based Anti-corruption Commission (IBAC) which found there were no “deficiencies or areas of concern” in 2017.
After Mr Andrews’ triple-0 call following the collision was made public late last year, the former Victorian Premier and his wife released a joint statement maintaining “we did nothing wrong”.
“This matter has been comprehensively investigated over many years by Victoria Police Professional Standards Command and IBAC,” they said.
“While we are sorry that the cyclist was injured in the accident, we did nothing wrong.”
Slater and Gordon has been contacted for comment.
https://www.news.com.au/national/victoria/courts-law/slater-and-gordon-reach-settlement-with-ryan-meuleman-over-2013-crash-with-dan-andrews-vehicle/news-story/a820a04a85fd135753a392851743edaa
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dm44_lIkg6w
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73439
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22977652 (010849ZMAY25) Notable: Election 2025: Chinese operative admits he has been helping Labor at elections for years - A Labor Party member at the centre of a controversy over the recruiting of Chinese volunteers for Housing Minister Clare O’Neil says he has “mobilised” political campaigners from an organisation linked to the CCP over multiple federal elections. As the Australian Electoral Commission broadened its investigation on Wednesday into the axed plan to provide volunteers for Ms O’Neil from the Hubei Association, Chap Chow described himself as a political organiser and “friend” of the Albanese government cabinet minister. Mr Chow said he travelled on a trip to China funded by a Chinese airline and it can also be revealed he campaigned to keep mainland Chinese separated from Hong Kong and Taiwanese community members as part of a planned redistribution of federal electorates in Melbourne. The Australian has obtained an email written last year by Mr Chow relating to the AEC’s redistribution in which he “expressed his concerns” over the plan to include the suburb of Box Hill in the electorate of Menzies. In the letter, the Labor Party member suggested it would be better to keep voters with mainland Chinese heritage apart from Hong Kong and Taiwanese people if possible to “avoid riots”. “The electorate of Menzies contains two suburbs … Doncaster and Templestowe which respectively each accommodates large proportion of Chinese Australians,” the email states. “Box Hill too contains quite a large proportion of Chinese … the only difference is, while the Chinese who live in Doncaster and Templestowe are mainly immigrants from Taiwan and Hong Kong, those who live in Box Hill are predominantly from mainland China. Given the tension in recent history over the Taiwan Strait and the Hong Kong riot, mixing … does not foster social harmony … the Eastern Freeway … would make a most convenient and identifiable border.”
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73415
>>73428
>>73429
>>73436
Election 2025: Chinese operative admits he has been helping Labor at elections for years
MOHAMMAD ALFARES - 30 April 2025
1/2
A Labor Party member at the centre of a controversy over the recruiting of Chinese volunteers for Housing Minister Clare O’Neil says he has “mobilised” political campaigners from an organisation linked to the CCP over multiple federal elections.
As the Australian Electoral Commission broadened its investigation on Wednesday into the axed plan to provide volunteers for Ms O’Neil from the Hubei Association, Chap Chow described himself as a political organiser and “friend” of the Albanese government cabinet minister.
Mr Chow said he travelled on a trip to China funded by a Chinese airline and it can also be revealed he campaigned to keep mainland Chinese separated from Hong Kong and Taiwanese community members as part of a planned redistribution of federal electorates in Melbourne.
The Australian has obtained an email written last year by Mr Chow relating to the AEC’s redistribution in which he “expressed his concerns” over the plan to include the suburb of Box Hill in the electorate of Menzies.
In the letter, the Labor Party member suggested it would be better to keep voters with mainland Chinese heritage apart from Hong Kong and Taiwanese people if possible to “avoid riots”.
“The electorate of Menzies contains two suburbs … Doncaster and Templestowe which respectively each accommodates large proportion of Chinese Australians,” the email states.
“Box Hill too contains quite a large proportion of Chinese … the only difference is, while the Chinese who live in Doncaster and Templestowe are mainly immigrants from Taiwan and Hong Kong, those who live in Box Hill are predominantly from mainland China.
“Given the tension in recent history over the Taiwan Strait and the Hong Kong riot, mixing … does not foster social harmony … the Eastern Freeway … would make a most convenient and identifiable border.”
The election watchdog revealed on Wednesday it would refer allegations that Hubei Association was planning to send out 10 Chinese volunteers to Ms O’Neil’s electorate of Hotham to a national taskforce for investigation.
As part of its ongoing investigation into the use of two Hubei-linked volunteers by Kooyong teal MP Monique Ryan, the AEC will review the revelations around Mr Chow.
“They will review all current reporting, and other available information, as part of what they’re looking into,” an AEC spokesperson said.
The taskforce is made up of officials from several government agencies, including the federal police, ASIO and the AEC.
Mr Chow – ALP member #62828 who joined the party in 2004 and who previously worked as an electorate officer for former state Labor MP Hong Lim — said he was “helping” Ms O’Neil’s campaign and confirmed he initiated the plan to recruit Hubei Association members for the minister.
“My own idea, yes,” he told The Australian. “I did ask and I did encourage many people, not only (from) Hubei, but from a lot of other associations.
“I asked a lot of associations, a lot of my friends. Year after year, every election, I mobilised, not only for the Labor Party, but people who are friendly to me to help me.”
Mr Chow rejected the idea that foreign influence was a genuine concern, calling recent media attention “unnecessary”.
“We have very strong anti-foreign influence laws,” he said.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73440
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22977668 (010900ZMAY25) Notable: Catholic schools election intervention in key seats sparks independents’ ire - The Catholic Church in Victoria has intervened in the federal election campaign, attempting to dissuade their school parents from voting for Greens or independent candidates in seven hotly contested electorates. A series of letters written by the Victorian Catholic Education Authority and distributed to parents of Catholic school students in the seats of Monash, Wannon, Goldstein, Kooyong, Cooper, Wills and Macnamara, highlights the support provided for Catholic school funding by major party candidates while raising uncertainly about the position of independents and minor party candidates. It urges parents to “take this letter into consideration” when they vote. The VCEA, as a registered charity, is prohibited by Australian Charities and Not-for-profits Commission (ACNC) rules from promoting or opposing a political party or candidate for political office. VCEA chairman James Merlino, a former Labor deputy premier of Victoria, defended the intervention. “The information provided to parents and carers was factually correct and focused on the positions of the main candidates, as this would be most relevant to parents,” he said in a statement. “It does not endorse a particular candidate. “It is entirely up to parents how they use the information that has been provided to them. We make no apology for representing the best interests of Catholic schools, parents, teachers and students.”
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73415
Catholic schools election intervention in key seats sparks independents’ ire
Chip Le Grand - April 30, 2025
1/2
The Catholic Church in Victoria has intervened in the federal election campaign, attempting to dissuade their school parents from voting for Greens or independent candidates in seven hotly contested electorates.
A series of letters written by the Victorian Catholic Education Authority and distributed to parents of Catholic school students in the seats of Monash, Wannon, Goldstein, Kooyong, Cooper, Wills and Macnamara, highlights the support provided for Catholic school funding by major party candidates while raising uncertainly about the position of independents and minor party candidates.
It urges parents to “take this letter into consideration” when they vote.
The VCEA, as a registered charity, is prohibited by Australian Charities and Not-for-profits Commission (ACNC) rules from promoting or opposing a political party or candidate for political office. Organisations can be stripped of their charitable status and generous tax treatment if found to have acted for a political purpose.
VCEA chairman James Merlino, a former Labor deputy premier of Victoria, defended the intervention.
“The information provided to parents and carers was factually correct and focused on the positions of the main candidates, as this would be most relevant to parents,” he said in a statement. “It does not endorse a particular candidate.
“It is entirely up to parents how they use the information that has been provided to them. We make no apology for representing the best interests of Catholic schools, parents, teachers and students.”
Independent MPs or candidates in three of those electorates have accused the VCEA of misrepresenting their position.
In the western Victorian seat of Wannon, a letter sent by one of the leading Catholic schools in the electorate, Monivae College, praises current Liberal MP Dan Tehan as a “strong supporter of Catholic education for many years” and a former education minister who delivered “fairer and more equitable funding” to low-fee Catholic schools.
The same letter claims the VCEA wrote to independent candidate Alex Dyson to enquire about his support for Catholic schools and received no response. Dyson, who is mounting a serious challenge to Tehan in the previously safe seat, said he was given no opportunity to meet with the VCEA before they wrote to school parents.
“When local parents started to receive letters from the VCEA, I sent letters to principals of Catholic schools in Wannon to clarify my position,” Dyson said. “I’m the child of two parents who taught in Catholic schools across Wannon, including Monivae College. I understand how vital educational choice is for families in Wannon.”
The VCEA this week issued a clarifying letter noting Dyson had “recently indicated his support for the current funding model for Catholic schools”.
Independent candidate for Monash Deborah Leonard said her position was similarly misrepresented. “They never asked me for my position on funding for Catholic schools,” she told this masthead. “If they had, I would have told them I support continued funding for Catholic schools.”
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73441
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22977683 (010907ZMAY25) Notable: Video: Malcolm Turnbull: Trump 'enormous disruption', AUKUS 'absolute shocker' - In an interview on Q+A with Jack Tame, former Australian Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull said both New Zealand and Australia needed to do more to ensure their defence capabilities are “sovereign”, and not controlled by another country. “For countries like Australia and New Zealand, we are confronted with a United States with whom we shared the same values for 80 years now no longer sharing those values,” said Turnbull. He said Trump instead believes in the ethos of “might is right”, and that should be very concerning for smaller countries that rely on the rules-based international order. Turnbull cited the bullying of NATO members Canada and Denmark in an attempt to annex Canada as the 51st state, and Greenland as American territory, as examples of how the United States has dramatically changed. “We have to be clear-eyed about this - this is not the United States we grew up with. Trump’s values are more closely aligned with Vladimir Putin than they are with any of his predecessors – Democrat or Republican.” “This is a time of enormous disruption, and I think the challenge for Australia and New Zealand - we have to look to a world where there is no longer American leadership.” Turnbull argued the AUKUS deal, in which Australia is scheduled to receive nuclear-powered submarines, puts Australia in a dangerous position and potentially without any submarines at all. He added Australia's submarine deal as part of Pillar 1, however, is a "massive mistake" and an "absolute shocker". Turnbull explained that Australia’s existing fleet is coming to the end of its life, and under the terms of the AUKUS agreement, the Virginia-class submarines can only be given to Australia if the USA has sufficient reserves, which is very unlikely to be the case in the coming decades.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50771 (pb)
>>73432
Malcolm Turnbull: Trump 'enormous disruption', AUKUS 'absolute shocker'
Q+A Reporters - Apr 27, 2025
In an interview on Q+A with Jack Tame, former Australian Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull said both New Zealand and Australia needed to do more to ensure their defence capabilities are “sovereign”, and not controlled by another country.
“For countries like Australia and New Zealand, we are confronted with a United States with whom we shared the same values for 80 years now no longer sharing those values,” said Turnbull.
He said Trump instead believes in the ethos of “might is right”, and that should be very concerning for smaller countries that rely on the rules-based international order.
Turnbull cited the bullying of NATO members Canada and Denmark in an attempt to annex Canada as the 51st state, and Greenland as American territory, as examples of how the United States has dramatically changed.
“We have to be clear-eyed about this – this is not the United States we grew up with. Trump’s values are more closely aligned with Vladimir Putin than they are with any of his predecessors – Democrat or Republican.”
“This is a time of enormous disruption, and I think the challenge for Australia and New Zealand – we have to look to a world where there is no longer American leadership.”
Turnbull argued the AUKUS deal, in which Australia is scheduled to receive nuclear-powered submarines, puts Australia in a dangerous position and potentially without any submarines at all. He added Australia's submarine deal as part of Pillar 1, however, is a "massive mistake" and an "absolute shocker".
Turnbull explained that Australia’s existing fleet is coming to the end of its life, and under the terms of the AUKUS agreement, the Virginia-class submarines can only be given to Australia if the USA has sufficient reserves, which is very unlikely to be the case in the coming decades.
That contrasted with a deal to build submarines Turnbull’s government negotiated with France, which was torn up by Scott Morrison’s government in order to sign up to AUKUS.
Speaking just before ANZAC Day, Turnbull said there is “strength in numbers,” and New Zealand and Australia’s militaries should work together “seamlessly”.
“I think the real issue is that Australia has to do more to make its defence capability sovereign – that is to say independent of any other country, and focus on our ability defend our own country, and in your case your country.”
He said both countries would need to do so “in circumstances where we can’t necessarily rely on the United States.”
In terms of the technology sharing agreement AUKUS Pillar Two - which New Zealand might sign up but has not yet been invited to consider – Turnbull said very little progress had been made so far.
However, he said in principle a technology sharing agreement could have value for New Zealand, depending on the direction any future progress takes.
https://www.1news.co.nz/2025/04/27/malcolm-turnbull-trump-enormous-disruption-aukus-absolute-shocker/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZdSYDBnc0Gc
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73442
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22977695 (010916ZMAY25) Notable: ‘Secret recording’ win as Ben Roberts-Smith appeals war crimes ruling - Nine reporter Nick McKenzie has acknowledged writing in his book that he had “his balls in a vice” because his career would be over if he lost the defamation case brought against him by Ben Roberts-Smith, but insisted he was only ever motivated “to find evidence of truth”. McKenzie took the stand late on Thursday in Robert-Smith’s appeal against the finding that he was a war criminal, after the Federal Court ruled earlier in the day that the secret recording at the heart of the case should be allowed into evidence. The recording was a snippet of a phone conversation between McKenzie and Roberts-Smith’s former mistress, known in the case as Person 17, in which the journalist appears to admit having access to the war veteran’s privileged legal strategy. Roberts-Smith argues that this access gave Nine newspapers an unfair advantage in the defamation trial and constituted a miscarriage of justice. In cross-examination, barrister Arthur Moses, appearing for Roberts-Smith, probed McKenzie about whether it was ethical for a journalist to unlawfully gain unauthorised access to someone else’s personal data, and whether he had ever done so. “In your work as an investigative journalist, have you ever unlawfully gained unauthorised access to someone else’s personal data by using subterfuge?” Moses asked. “I believe - well, yes,” McKenzie replied. However, he strenuously denied acting unethically.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73424
>>73425
‘Secret recording’ win as Ben Roberts-Smith appeals war crimes ruling
STEPHEN RICE - 1 May 2025
1/2
Nine reporter Nick McKenzie has acknowledged writing in his book that he had “his balls in a vice” because his career would be over if he lost the defamation case brought against him by Ben Roberts-Smith, but insisted he was only ever motivated “to find evidence of truth”.
McKenzie took the stand late on Thursday in Robert-Smith’s appeal against the finding that he was a war criminal, after the Federal Court ruled earlier in the day that the secret recording at the heart of the case should be allowed into evidence.
The recording was a snippet of a phone conversation between McKenzie and Roberts-Smith’s former mistress, known in the case as Person 17, in which the journalist appears to admit having access to the war veteran’s privileged legal strategy.
Roberts-Smith argues that this access gave Nine newspapers an unfair advantage in the defamation trial and constituted a miscarriage of justice.
In cross-examination, barrister Arthur Moses, appearing for Roberts-Smith, probed McKenzie about whether it was ethical for a journalist to unlawfully gain unauthorised access to someone else’s personal data, and whether he had ever done so.
“In your work as an investigative journalist, have you ever unlawfully gained unauthorised access to someone else’s personal data by using subterfuge?” Moses asked.
“I believe – well, yes,” McKenzie replied.
However, he strenuously denied acting unethically.
Moses asked McKenzie about a story he wrote in The Age in 2010 after gaining access to the Labor Party’s electorate database, revealing the party had stored personal details of voters.
In July 2013 in the Melbourne Magistrates Court, McKenzie acknowledged he was not authorised to access the database, Moses said, but did not receive a criminal conviction after agreeing to enter into a court diversion program.
McKenzie accepted the proposition put by Moses that his methods of gathering the information were unlawful but did not accept he breached his ethics as a journalist in obtaining it.
“Mr Moses, we placed the fact of our access to the database on the front page of the paper in the story we reported, we weren’t hiding it … we thought it was a reasonable thing to do.”
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73443
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22981918 (021245ZMAY25) Notable: Final Newspoll: Anthony Albanese to defy historic major party slump - The combined primary vote of the major parties has fallen to a record low on the eve of the election, with Anthony Albanese on track to be returned for a second term but without any guarantee of securing majority government. But both leaders will also contest the election with deeply negative approval ratings, with both the Prime Minister and Peter Dutton suffering declines in personal support in the final week of the campaign. The final Newspoll of the campaign conducted for The Australian shows Labor ahead of the Coalition with a two party preferred lead of 52.5-47.5 per cent. A majority of voters claim they would be better off personally over the next three years under a Labor government than the Coalition. As the two candidates for the Lodge made their final pitches to voters on Friday, the Opposition Leader claimed the nation could not afford another three years of the economic trajectory it was on under Labor. “We can’t afford to continue on our current path,” Mr Dutton told The Australian, as he spent his final full day of campaigning swinging through the Perth suburbs. “We’ve had the largest fall in living standards in history, power bills, food and insurance costs are all higher, housing is unaffordable, and our country is less safe. “The Prime Minister is weak and simply not up to the job.” Mr Albanese - who spent his day fighting for votes in Tasmania, Melbourne and Mr Dutton’s northern Brisbane seat of Dickson – said the election presented a clear choice and urged voters to stick with Labor during uncertain times. “This election is a choice,” the Prime Minister told The Australian. “Building Australia’s future under Labor with tax cuts, stronger Medicare, 20 per cent off student debt, 5 per cent first home deposit – or higher taxes, bigger deficits and savage cuts under the Liberals. In uncertain times Australians cannot risk the Liberals’ chaos … (they) have changed policies daily.”
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73415
Final Newspoll: Anthony Albanese to defy historic major party slump
SIMON BENSON - 2 May 2025
1/2
The combined primary vote of the major parties has fallen to a record low on the eve of the election, with Anthony Albanese on track to be returned for a second term but without any guarantee of securing majority government.
But both leaders will also contest the election with deeply negative approval ratings, with both the Prime Minister and Peter Dutton suffering declines in personal support in the final week of the campaign.
The final Newspoll of the campaign conducted for The Australian shows Labor ahead of the Coalition with a two party preferred lead of 52.5-47.5 per cent. A majority of voters claim they would be better off personally over the next three years under a Labor government than the Coalition.
As the two candidates for the Lodge made their final pitches to voters on Friday, the Opposition Leader claimed the nation could not afford another three years of the economic trajectory it was on under Labor.
“We can’t afford to continue on our current path,” Mr Dutton told The Australian, as he spent his final full day of campaigning swinging through the Perth suburbs.
“We’ve had the largest fall in living standards in history, power bills, food and insurance costs are all higher, housing is unaffordable, and our country is less safe.
“The Prime Minister is weak and simply not up to the job.”
Mr Albanese – who spent his day fighting for votes in Tasmania, Melbourne and Mr Dutton’s northern Brisbane seat of Dickson – said the election presented a clear choice and urged voters to stick with Labor during uncertain times. “This election is a choice,” the Prime Minister told The Australian. “Building Australia’s future under Labor with tax cuts, stronger Medicare, 20 per cent off student debt, 5 per cent first home deposit – or higher taxes, bigger deficits and savage cuts under the Liberals. In uncertain times Australians cannot risk the Liberals’ chaos … (they) have changed policies daily.”
The final two-party-preferred vote is largely unchanged on the split across the course of the five-week election campaign.
It shows that the contest has returned to the results of the May 2022 election result, when Labor won government with a single-seat majority on a two party preferred vote of 52.1 per cent.
But both Labor and the Liberal/Nationals have suffered a fall in their primary votes in the final week of the campaign, with almost half the nation having already voted.
Labor’s primary vote has fallen a point to 33 per cent which is virtually unchanged on its last election result of 32.6 per cent. The Coalition has also suffered a one point slide in its primary vote since last week with support now sitting at 34 per cent. This would be a record low for the Coalition if repeated at the election and represents a 1.7 point decline from the 35.7 per cent recorded in May 2022.
It leaves the combined vote for the two major parties on 67 per cent. At the last election it was 68.3 per cent which at the time was a record low.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73444
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22981936 (021253ZMAY25) Notable: Video: Election 2025: Peter Dutton banking on ‘surprises’ in key seats - Peter Dutton is confident of winning at least 10 seats from Labor on Saturday night but would need a miracle to beat Anthony Albanese, according to Coalition strategists relying on tracking polling in key electorates and strong pre-poll support for the Liberals and Nationals. The Australian can reveal that despite the Liberals and Nationals falling behind the ALP in national polls, Coalition campaign headquarters believes it can win as many as 10 seats from Labor, three seats from teal independents and one from the Greens. After seat polling in January indicated Mr Dutton was on track for a historic victory over the first-term Albanese government, the Coalition’s position has deteriorated on the back of Labor scare campaigns and a boost for the Prime Minister after Donald Trump’s tariffs blitz. As of Wednesday night, senior Liberal strategists believed the Coalition was most likely to pick up 10 seats. Based on the most optimistic and best-case scenario, which opposition figures concede won’t happen, there is a pathway that could give the Coalition 22 seats. Despite many battleground contests being considered line ball, the Coalition is hopeful of winning a rump of ALP seats including Aston, Gilmore, McEwen, Tangney, Solomon, Paterson, Werriwa, Gorton, Hawke and the newly established Western Australia seat of Bullwinkel, which is notionally held by Labor.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73415
Election 2025: Peter Dutton banking on ‘surprises’ in key seats
GEOFF CHAMBERS and DENNIS SHANAHAN - 2 May 2025
Peter Dutton is confident of winning at least 10 seats from Labor on Saturday night but would need a miracle to beat Anthony Albanese, according to Coalition strategists relying on tracking polling in key electorates and strong pre-poll support for the Liberals and Nationals.
The Australian can reveal that despite the Liberals and Nationals falling behind the ALP in national polls, Coalition campaign headquarters believes it can win as many as 10 seats from Labor, three seats from teal independents and one from the Greens.
After seat polling in January indicated Mr Dutton was on track for a historic victory over the first-term Albanese government, the Coalition’s position has deteriorated on the back of Labor scare campaigns and a boost for the Prime Minister after Donald Trump’s tariffs blitz.
As of Wednesday night, senior Liberal strategists believed the Coalition was most likely to pick up 10 seats. Based on the most optimistic and best-case scenario, which opposition figures concede won’t happen, there is a pathway that could give the Coalition 22 seats.
Despite many battleground contests being considered line ball, the Coalition is hopeful of winning a rump of ALP seats including Aston, Gilmore, McEwen, Tangney, Solomon, Paterson, Werriwa, Gorton, Hawke and the newly established Western Australia seat of Bullwinkel, which is notionally held by Labor.
As Mr Albanese jetted into WA on Thursday to campaign in the Perth seat of Tangney, Mr Dutton declared there would be “surprises” on Saturday.
“We’ve got some amazing candidates who are going to win seats that aren’t even on the radar at the moment. In NSW, in Victoria. I think there are surprises in WA and I think there’s a potential surprise in Queensland as well. And there’s an enormous amount of work that’s been going on at a micro level,” Mr Dutton said.
The Australian understands the Coalition believes it will definitely gain eight seats, likely win 10 seats and potentially pick up 12. If the Coalition can win back 10 seats, Labor would fall into a minority government with around 72 or 73 seats.
Since pre-poll centres opened last week, Coalition strategists confirmed polling of early voters showed stronger support for Liberal and Nationals MPs and candidates compared to the 2022 election. Pauline Hanson’s One Nation party is also polling higher than the last election. If One Nation preferences flow as strongly to the Coalition as some strategists believe, there are hopes in Liberal and Nationals ranks of tight races in regional Labor seats including in the NSW Hunter.
The Coalition expects to win former blue-ribbon Liberal seats lost in 2022 including the Greens’ seat of Ryan in Brisbane and the teals electorates of Goldstein, Curtin and likely Kooyong. The Nationals believe they can potentially pull off an upset win in the regional Victorian Labor-held electorate of Bendigo, held by Lisa Chesters on a 10.9 per cent margin.
While Coalition insiders believe they will fend off challenges from Climate 200-backed teal candidates in Wannon, Cowper and Forrest, there are concerns about holding the Liberal-held northern Sydney seat of Bradfield. The Liberals’ Tasmanian seats of Bass and Braddon are considered too close to call but the Coalition is confident of retaining them.
Labor, which could claim the Adelaide electorate of Sturt from the Liberals, is also facing neck-and-neck races in Bennelong, Robertson and Lyons. ALP strategists remain worried about Victoria but are confident of holding the Melbourne seats of Wills and Macnamara, which are under threat from the Greens.
The ALP is expected to win the Greens’ seat of Brisbane but believe it is too close to call in neighbouring Griffith, which Max Chandler-Mather won from Labor in 2022. The Labor-held Northern Territory seat of Lingiari, which is considered tough to poll, remains too close to call.
In a fundraising email to Coalition supporters on Thursday afternoon, NSW Liberal state director Chris Stone urged them to not “believe the polls” and asked for donations to increase their social and digital media campaigns.
“This election is a lot closer than the public polls suggest. Just like in 2019, the result will come down to the campaigns we’re running seat by seat here in NSW. We still need to reach 150,765 undecided voters in NSW before election day on Saturday,” he said.
“There is an enormous amount of work being undertaken by our candidates on the ground. In many cases, as evidenced in the research we have done, our candidates have got a higher name ID than some lazy sitting Labor members.”
https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/election-2025-peter-dutton-banking-on-surprises-in-key-seats/news-story/dc618ad38c7a34f95716f984d79ab3b5
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QxUuPNprY8M
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73445
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22981951 (021304ZMAY25) Notable: Video: Election 2025: Anthony Albanese and Penny Wong dine out with friends of Chinese Communist Party - Labor has courted Beijing-backed property developers and senior figures in the Chinese Communist Party’s foreign-influence arm in a pre-election push to secure Australian Chinese donations and lock in the community’s votes in key seats. The Australian can reveal Anthony Albanese celebrated his birthday in March at an intimate lunch with the Chinese Building Association of NSW, which has close ties to state-run construction firms in China. And Foreign Minister Penny Wong enjoyed yum cha in Brisbane last month with ALP donor Peter Zhiwu Zheng, the president of a Chinese cultural association linked to the CCP’s United Front Work Department. Australian Chinese votes will be critical in at least 10 seats in Saturday’s election, including four each in Sydney and Melbourne, and one each in Brisbane and Perth. Members of the CBANSW sang happy birthday to Mr Albanese and presented him with a sparkler-topped cake at the function in early March, just weeks before the Prime Minister called the May 3 poll. Video of the event was circulated on WeChat by a Beijing-based influencer who shares Australian content with more than 3 million followers.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73415
>>73428
>>73439
>>73421
Election 2025: Anthony Albanese and Penny Wong dine out with friends of Chinese Communist Party
BEN PACKHAM and DAVID TANNER - May 01, 2025
1/2
Labor has courted Beijing-backed property developers and senior figures in the Chinese Communist Party’s foreign-influence arm in a pre-election push to secure Australian Chinese donations and lock in the community’s votes in key seats.
The Australian can reveal Anthony Albanese celebrated his birthday in March at an intimate lunch with the Chinese Building Association of NSW, which has close ties to state-run construction firms in China.
And Foreign Minister Penny Wong enjoyed yum cha in Brisbane last month with ALP donor Peter Zhiwu Zheng, the president of a Chinese cultural association linked to the CCP’s United Front Work Department.
The revelations come after The Australian revealed cabinet minister Clare O’Neil’s campaign recruited 10 members of a Chinese United Front-linked group to staff polling booths in her seat of Hotham on polling day.
Australian Chinese votes will be critical in at least 10 seats in Saturday’s election, including four each in Sydney and Melbourne, and one each in Brisbane and Perth.
The Prime Minister, who was lauded last year by Chinese state-run media as an example for other world leaders to follow, is banking on solid support from the community to get Labor across the line.
The Coalition has also worked hard to win over the ethnic group by cultivating ties with Chinese organisations, and has preselected a candidate with strong ties to Beijing for the unwinnable sixth spot on the LNP’s Queensland ticket.
Members of the CBANSW sang happy birthday to Mr Albanese and presented him with a sparkler-topped cake at the function in early March, just weeks before the Prime Minister called the May 3 poll. Video of the event was circulated on WeChat by a Beijing-based influencer who shares Australian content with more than 3 million followers.
The CBANSW’s China-born chief executive, Carson Gao, who is seated to Mr Albanese’s right in the video, was in China this week spruiking investment opportunities in Australia’s resurgent property sector. Mr Gao led the association’s delegation during meetings with the China Real Estate Association, major developers and supply chain firms.
The association’s president and founder Hao Liu is managing director of the Chinese-owned construction company Starryland Australia, whose parent company is the state-owned Hubei Fuxing Science and Technology Co. Another of the association’s board members, property developer Harvard Shen, is on the committee of the United Front body Australian Chushang Entrepreneurs Association.
Senator Wong and Labor’s candidate for the Brisbane seat of Moreton, Julie-Ann Campbell, dined with Mr Zheng at the Landmark Restaurant, in suburban Sunnybank, on April 7.
Moreton is home to the largest concentration of people with Chinese ancestry in Brisbane, according to census data, and is one of the many outer-suburban seats Peter Dutton has targeted.
Mr Zheng, who has donated $13,000 to Queensland Labor and $1090 to the LNP since 2019, according to AEC records, is president of the Australia China Cultural and Economic Promotion Association – a key United Front group in Queensland.
According to the Australian Strategic Policy Institute: “The overseas functions of United Front include increasing the CCP’s political interference, interfering in Chinese (expat communities), suppressing dissident movements, building a permissive international environment for a takeover of Taiwan, intelligence gathering, encouraging investment in China, and facilitating technology transfer.”
The CBANSW lunch for Mr Albanese followed a prime ministerial invitation to Mr Gao last year to attend a lunch in Parliament House’s Great Hall with Chinese Premier Li Qiang.
Mr Gao also hosted Skills and Training Minister Andrew Giles and Labor’s member for Bennelong, Jerome Laxale, in January to discuss the sector’s challenges and opportunities, and invited opposition housing spokesman Michael Sukkar to address its 2024 gala dinner. Bennelong and Mr Sukkar’s Deakin also have large Chinese communities.
Clive Hamilton, who exposed the Chinese Communist Party’s global program of influence and subversion in his book Hidden Hand, said the CBANSW almost certainly took its cues from the CCP. “It’s fair to assume that any Chinese business association is one that Beijing will have an interest in – it’s just how they work,” Professor Hamilton said.
Labor campaign headquarters declined to comment on Mr Albanese’s dealings with the association and Senator Wong’s meeting with Mr Zheng. Mr Gao also passed up the opportunity to comment, saying he was feeling ill after returning from his China trip.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73446
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22981980 (021312ZMAY25) Notable: ‘He did right by me’: Julian Assange endorses Anthony Albanese - WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange has broken his silence to endorse a second term for Anthony Albanese as he praised the prime minister’s efforts to secure his release from prison. Assange, who attended Pope Francis’ funeral in the Vatican last week in a rare public sighting, has almost entirely avoided public commentary since his dramatic return to Australia last June after he struck a plea deal with the US Justice Department. He was detained for more than five years in London’s high security Belmarsh Prison after being charged with espionage and computer hacking for publishing hundreds of thousands of classified US military documents on the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq. Albanese raised Assange’s case several times in his meetings with former US president Joe Biden, making clear his release was a priority for the Australian government and public. Assange said that, in the lead-up to Saturday’s federal election, many Australians had asked him whether Albanese’s role in his release had been overstated and whether he “has the backbone to stand up for Australians on other tough issues”. “The truth is, in what became an impressive field of advocates, Albo did more to secure my freedom than any other politician or public figure, even more than the late Pope, whose support was both moving and significant,” Assange said in a statement provided to this masthead. Assange said that Albanese had promised to lobby for his release when he was opposition leader and followed through on this pledge when he became prime minister. “Against all expectations for an Australian politician, once elected, he kept his word,” Assange said. Beyond advocating for his release, Assange said the Albanese government “has proven itself unusually capable of rescuing Australians caught up in sensitive political situations”. “Albo hasn’t just stood up to the US to end the political imprisonment of an Australian, he’s also intervened for other Australians detained in difficult circumstances, including in China,” he said, referring to the release of journalist Cheng Lei. “Does this mean Albo will put Australian interests first and skilfully navigate tensions between the US, EU, and China? I can’t say for sure. But I do know this: He can. Albo did right by me, and he is worlds apart from [Scott] Morrison. You don’t need to be a bully to have a backbone.”
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73411
>>73415
‘He did right by me’: Julian Assange endorses Anthony Albanese
Matthew Knott - May 2, 2025
WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange has broken his silence to endorse a second term for Anthony Albanese as he praised the prime minister’s efforts to secure his release from prison.
Assange, who attended Pope Francis’ funeral in the Vatican last week in a rare public sighting, has almost entirely avoided public commentary since his dramatic return to Australia last June after he struck a plea deal with the US Justice Department.
He was detained for more than five years in London’s high security Belmarsh Prison after being charged with espionage and computer hacking for publishing hundreds of thousands of classified US military documents on the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq.
Albanese raised Assange’s case several times in his meetings with former US president Joe Biden, making clear his release was a priority for the Australian government and public.
Assange said that, in the lead-up to Saturday’s federal election, many Australians had asked him whether Albanese’s role in his release had been overstated and whether he “has the backbone to stand up for Australians on other tough issues”.
“The truth is, in what became an impressive field of advocates, Albo did more to secure my freedom than any other politician or public figure, even more than the late Pope, whose support was both moving and significant,” Assange said in a statement provided to this masthead.
Assange said that Albanese had promised to lobby for his release when he was opposition leader and followed through on this pledge when he became prime minister.
“Against all expectations for an Australian politician, once elected, he kept his word,” Assange said.
Assange was released from prison in the UK after he agreed to plead guilty to one US charge of conspiring to unlawfully obtain and disseminate classified national defence information in June last year. He was then flown to Australia and released.
The activist had earlier taken refuge in the Ecuadorian embassy in London in 2012 when facing sexual assault charges in Sweden that were later dropped.
Beyond advocating for his release, Assange said the Albanese government “has proven itself unusually capable of rescuing Australians caught up in sensitive political situations”.
“Albo hasn’t just stood up to the US to end the political imprisonment of an Australian, he’s also intervened for other Australians detained in difficult circumstances, including in China,” he said, referring to the release of journalist Cheng Lei.
“Does this mean Albo will put Australian interests first and skilfully navigate tensions between the US, EU, and China? I can’t say for sure.
“But I do know this: He can.
“Albo did right by me, and he is worlds apart from [Scott] Morrison. You don’t need to be a bully to have a backbone.”
Of Albanese’s predecessors, Assange was particularly critical of Morrison for what he said was a lack of effort to secure his release.
The Coalition has pledged to create a special envoy for hostage affairs to advocate for Australians jailed overseas on flimsy or politically motivated charges, saying more can be done to secure their release.
Albanese said last year that Assange’s release was “the culmination of careful, patient and determined advocacy”.
“Regardless of what you think of his activities, Mr Assange’s case had dragged on for far too long,” he said.
https://www.smh.com.au/politics/federal/he-did-right-by-me-julian-assange-endorses-anthony-albanese-20250502-p5lw1r.html
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73447
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22982064 (021342ZMAY25) Notable: Video: Trump called this Australian billionaire a ‘red-haired weirdo’. Now, they’ve met again - Eighteen months ago, when a troubling story emerged alleging Donald Trump had disclosed sensitive information about US nuclear submarines to packaging magnate Anthony Pratt at Mar-a-Lago, Trump denied it and called the Australian billionaire a “red-haired weirdo”. Now, Pratt is a US green card holder and - having just announced his company will invest billions of dollars in American manufacturing – scored an invitation to a White House ceremony, where the president described him as a friend. Seated in the White House’s grand foyer on Wednesday, Washington time, about 80 dignitaries listened as Trump read through a list of business leaders who were contributing to US industry, like an emcee thanking donors at a charity ball. “Executive global chairman of Pratt Industries, friend of mine, Anthony Pratt - he’s investing $US5 billion ($7.82 billion), thank you,” Trump said as Pratt stood in his blue suit, flashed his hand up in thanks, and sat down again. Trump went on: “I read a report that he’s the richest man in Australia, but who the hell knows. Do you think you’re the richest man in Australia?” Pratt stood up again, hesitated and gestured to indicate he wasn’t sure. “Close,” Trump assisted. “I don’t like to put you on the spot like that, Anthony, but that’s pretty good.” According to the 2025 Forbes rich list, Pratt was the eighth-wealthiest person in Australia, though he is now US-based.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Trump called this Australian billionaire a ‘red-haired weirdo’. Now, they’ve met again
Michael Koziol - May 1, 2025
1/2
Washington: Eighteen months ago, when a troubling story emerged alleging Donald Trump had disclosed sensitive information about US nuclear submarines to packaging magnate Anthony Pratt at Mar-a-Lago, Trump denied it and called the Australian billionaire a “red-haired weirdo”.
Now, Pratt is a US green card holder and – having just announced his company will invest billions of dollars in American manufacturing – scored an invitation to a White House ceremony, where the president described him as a friend.
Seated in the White House’s grand foyer on Wednesday, Washington time, about 80 dignitaries listened as Trump read through a list of business leaders who were contributing to US industry, like an emcee thanking donors at a charity ball.
“Executive global chairman of Pratt Industries, friend of mine, Anthony Pratt – he’s investing $US5 billion ($7.82 billion), thank you,” Trump said as Pratt stood in his blue suit, flashed his hand up in thanks, and sat down again.
Trump went on: “I read a report that he’s the richest man in Australia, but who the hell knows. Do you think you’re the richest man in Australia?”
Pratt stood up again, hesitated and gestured to indicate he wasn’t sure. “Close,” Trump assisted. “I don’t like to put you on the spot like that, Anthony, but that’s pretty good.”
According to the 2025 Forbes rich list, Pratt was the eighth-wealthiest person in Australia, though he is now US-based.
The Australian billionaire spent the ceremony seated at the far end of the second row, mostly in silence. At one point, while waiting for the president to arrive, Pratt snapped a picture of a portrait of Barack Obama hanging near him on the wall.
That portrait was recently moved across the hall to make way for a new portrait of Trump, depicting him in the iconic photograph after being shot in Butler, Pennsylvania, bleeding and imploring the crowd to “fight, fight, fight” as he was taken off-stage.
Arranged around the president’s podium were products made by some of the corporations present, including Pratt cardboard boxes bearing US flags and “Invest in America” stickers.
Top business leaders in attendance included Nvidia boss Jensen Huang and GE Aerospace chief executive Larry Culp, as well as several members of Trump’s cabinet. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick shook Pratt’s hand and said a quick hello. Later, Pratt held an extended conversation with Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins.
Rollins appeared not to know Pratt at first, but when he explained who he was, she jumped back and exclaimed: “That’s you!” They went on to have a warm, animated conversation, and Pratt gave Rollins his business card.
Lutnick also passed by the assembled media and, when asked by this correspondent if he would strike a trade deal with Australia, indicated it was a matter for after the Australian election.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73448
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22985904 (030824ZMAY25) Notable: Video: Voting polls officially open for 2025 Federal Election - Voting polls across Australia have officially opened for the 2025 Federal Election. - 9 News Australia
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73415
Voting polls officially open for 2025 Federal Election
9 News Australia
May 3, 2025
Voting polls across Australia have officially opened for the 2025 Federal Election.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1PZlSYF4Eww
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73449
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22985947 (030845ZMAY25) Notable: Federal election polls open in most Australian way imaginable - In pictures: Election Day 2025 kicks off - May 3, 2025
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73448
Federal election polls open in most Australian way imaginable
In pictures - Election Day 2025 kicks off
Benjamin Graham - May 3, 2025
1/4
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73450
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22985966 (030903ZMAY25) Notable: Video: Australia Federal Election LIVE: Australians Head to Vote | Anthony Albanese vs Peter Dutton - BONDI BEACH LIFE SAVING CLUB, SYDNEY, AUSTRALIA - Australians vote in the country's federal election. Australians are voting on Saturday with the ruling centre-left Labor party a favourite to secure a majority government, according to a recent YouGov poll. Incumbent Prime Minister Anthony Albanese is seeking to defeat main challenger Peter Dutton of the conservative coalition to become the country’s first leader in two decades to win consecutive elections. The country’s cost-of-living crisis has dominated the lead-up to the polls, with both Labor and the Coalition unveiling a number of policies intended to ease spiralling housing costs. Recent uncertainty caused by US President Donald Trump has also had an unforeseen effect on Australian political discourse, with candidates navigating major geopolitical shifts across the Pacific. Australians have been casting their ballots in early voting since April 22, with more than 8.5 million people voting by pre-poll or postal votes before election day - a considerable jump on the 2022 election. - CNBC-TV18
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73415
>>73448
Australia Federal Election LIVE: Australians Head to Vote | Anthony Albanese vs Peter Dutton
CNBC-TV18
May 3, 2025
BONDI BEACH LIFE SAVING CLUB, SYDNEY, AUSTRALIA - Australians vote in the country's federal election.
Australians are voting on Saturday with the ruling centre-left Labor party a favourite to secure a majority government, according to a recent YouGov poll.
Incumbent Prime Minister Anthony Albanese is seeking to defeat main challenger Peter Dutton of the conservative coalition to become the country’s first leader in two decades to win consecutive elections.
The country’s cost-of-living crisis has dominated the lead-up to the polls, with both Labor and the Coalition unveiling a number of policies intended to ease spiralling housing costs.
Recent uncertainty caused by US President Donald Trump has also had an unforeseen effect on Australian political discourse, with candidates navigating major geopolitical shifts across the Pacific.
Australians have been casting their ballots in early voting since April 22, with more than 8.5 million people voting by pre-poll or postal votes before election day – a considerable jump on the 2022 election
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BEK2m_-fPM4
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73451
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22985970 (030905ZMAY25) Notable: Video: Australia Election Results 2025: Vote Counting Begins | Australia Election 2025 - Votes are counted after polls closed on the east coast in Australia's general election. The center-left Labor Party of Prime Minister Anthony Albanese is seeking a second three-year term. - CNN-News18
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73415
>>73448
Australia Election Results 2025: Vote Counting Begins | Australia Election 2025
CNN-News18
May 3, 2025
Votes are counted after polls closed on the east coast in Australia's general election. The center-left Labor Party of Prime Minister Anthony Albanese is seeking a second three-year term.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BLUk8bsU07k
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73452
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22985972 (030907ZMAY25) Notable: Video: Australia Decides: LIVE Federal election coverage from 9 News Australia - Join Nine News for the most comprehensive 2025 Federal Election coverage. - 9 News Australia
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73415
>>73448
Australia Decides: LIVE Federal election coverage from 9 News Australia
9 News Australia
May 3, 2025
Join Nine News for the most comprehensive 2025 Federal Election coverage.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EtxMjAUsNlc
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73453
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22985977 (030909ZMAY25) Notable: Video: Election Results: Sky News Australia - Sky News Australia brings you the latest results from the Australian Federal Election. - Sky News Australia
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73415
>>73448
Election Results: Sky News Australia
Sky News Australia
May 3, 2025
Sky News Australia brings you the latest results from the Australian Federal Election.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LeGG5DuysUA
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73454
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22985981 (030911ZMAY25) Notable: Video: LIVE: ABC NEWS Election Night Live with full results and analysis - David Speers and Sarah Ferguson deliver comprehensive results and analysis of the 2025 Australian Federal Election with Casey Briggs, Antony Green, Laura Tingle, Jeremy Fernandez, Bridget Brennan and Patricia Karvelas. - ABC News (Australia)
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73415
>>73448
LIVE: ABC NEWS Election Night Live with full results and analysis
ABC News (Australia)
May 3, 2025
David Speers and Sarah Ferguson deliver comprehensive results and analysis of the 2025 Australian Federal Election with Casey Briggs, Antony Green, Laura Tingle, Jeremy Fernandez, Bridget Brennan and Patricia Karvelas.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=er5hJ5JP_AU
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73455
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22986131 (031155ZMAY25) Notable: Sussan Ley: ‘We lost the flag, but we’re ready for a new season’ - "If you are one of the millions of dedicated footy fans, if you have barracked for one of our incredible Olympians or if you have been in a stadium cheering on the mighty Tillies, you will know you can’t always be on the winning side. As a Sydney Swans supporter I know after the loss of a grand final, when you get towelled up you don’t give up. You don’t drop your team or your belief in it either. You get a bag of ice, you watch the tapes and you get to work rebuilding. You do the work to come back stronger and faster next season. As someone who has served as an MP for the Liberal Party for almost 25 years, I have experienced both success and defeat. Just days ago we were handed a big loss that we must accept with humility. Despite the result, the Liberal Party remains the most successful political party in Australian history. We have won more flags than any other team. Our party has, more than any other, helped shape Australia into the prosperous, strong and fair society it is today. But we have to face up to the fact that despite our best efforts, we have failed to connect with a changing electorate. Now more than ever, the federal Liberal Party must respect, reflect and represent modern Australia. As leader, I have committed to a full assessment of why we lost the election. The next steps for our party are focused on listening to the community and rebuilding our movement. But we will never shy away from our timeless values, which will always underpin our policy development processes. We are ready to do the work; we are up for it; we will take a good hard look at ourselves. Preseason is about to begin and I know my team is hungry to get to work." - Sussan Ley, Leader of the Opposition - theaustralian.com.au
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73415
>>73448
Albanese leads Labor to historic victory as Dutton on brink of losing seat
David Crowe - May 3, 2025
1/2
Anthony Albanese will hold power as prime minister after leading Labor to an extraordinary victory at the federal election and driving Peter Dutton to the brink of defeat in his home seat.
A significant swing to Labor in more than a dozen seats put Labor in position to increase its majority in parliament, with some supporters calling the results a landslide.
The results made it impossible for Dutton to claim power, whether in minority or majority government, as the opposition leader was in danger of losing his seat of Dickson on the northern edge of Brisbane.
The prime minister signalled his confidence in seizing key seats from the Liberals at the end of a campaign fought on the cost of living, while early counting showed Australians were shifting to Labor in battleground seats.
The voting showed the Labor candidate for Dutton’s seat, Ali France, had posted a significant gain in her primary vote, putting her in a strong position to win the seat.
Treasurer Jim Chalmers said the Coalition’s nuclear policy had worked against Dutton in his home seat after he said he was willing to have a nuclear power station in his local area.
Labor also made gains in electorates including Leichhardt, a seat that includes Cairns and Cape York, where the party gained a big swing in early voting and was in a strong position to win.
Aged Care Minister Anika Wells, who holds the Brisbane seat of Lilley, did not claim victory early in the night but appeared confident of holding the seat.
In Bonner, one of the most marginal Brisbane electorates, Liberal member Ross Vasta suffered a double-digit swing against him in the early counting, putting Labor candidate Kara Cook ahead. Labor has not won the seat since 2007, when Queenslander Kevin Rudd led the party to victory.
Albanese insisted he could hold on to power during a series of interviews on Saturday, as he campaigned in Melbourne and Sydney and joined his partner, Jodie Haydon, and his son, Nathan, in casting his vote in his home seat of Grayndler.
“Majority government is, I think, very much in the interests of Australians,” he said.
Labor supporters said privately that the early count vindicated their predictions of a landslide for Albanese, although federal ministers have insisted they took nothing for granted and believed it was a tight contest.
Dutton argued throughout the campaign that Labor would have to rely on the Greens in a hung parliament unless voters swung behind the Coalition, and he kept up the message in the final hours of the campaign.
“I think a lot of quiet Australians have come out today to support the Coalition,” he said.
Speaking on the ABC shortly after polls closed, Treasurer Jim Chalmers said the outcome would depend on whether Labor could limit its losses in Victoria – admitting the pressure on the government in that state – and make gains elsewhere.
Liberal National Party senator James McGrath, an experienced party official and campaigner before he entered parliament, predicted a result so tight that Australians might not know on Saturday night who could form government.
“I don’t think we’re going to know who the next prime minister of the country is tonight,” McGrath told the ABC. “I think when everybody goes to bed, too many seats will be too close to call. There is a high soft vote out there still, and there are just a number of unique, different contests across the country.”
The early voting showed Labor was in a stronger position in key NSW seats such as Lindsay on the western edge of Sydney, centred on Penrith. The results showed a powerful swing against shadow minister Melissa McIntosh, putting Labor candidate Hollie McLean ahead in the race.
Liberals admitted the counting was not promising for their candidate in the Sydney seat of Bradfield, Gisele Kapterian. Teal independent Nicolette Boele had campaigned in the seat for several years with funding from Climate 200. The early counting showed a swing to Boele of about 9 per cent.
Labor began the campaign with 78 seats and the Coalition 54, although each had a vacant seat after Bill Shorten and Keith Pitt resigned this year. This gave the two sides a formal tally of 77 and 53, respectively.
The Greens went into the election with four seats in the lower house. Independents and minor party crossbenchers had 15 seats, in a tally that included former Coalition MPs Russell Broadbent, Ian Goodenough and Andrew Gee, who contested the election after moving to the crossbench.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73456
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22986141 (031204ZMAY25) Notable: ‘Very sad’: Dutton loses seat of Dickson in heavy Coalition defeat - Peter Dutton has lost his seat of Dickson in suburban Brisbane and become the first federal opposition leader to suffer such a loss in a devastating result for Coalition MPs. The result has sent a shockwave through the Coalition, which will be in opposition for another term after a heavy loss on Saturday night. Just weeks ago, the Coalition believed Dutton had a serious chance of defeating Anthony Albanese’s Labor government after just one term, but now there is an open contest for the leadership of the Liberal Party. The Coalition leader was defeated by Labor candidate Ali France, a disability advocate with an amputated leg who had already contested the seat against Dutton twice. She had to overturn a 1.7 per cent margin to win. Dutton, 54, is the first sitting party leader to lose their seat at an election since then-prime minister John Howard was beaten in Bennelong on the same night he lost government in 2007. Nationals leader Charles Blunt lost his seat of Richmond at the 1990 election, which was won by Labor. Dutton told Coalition supporters in Brisbane that he had called France to congratulate her on her victory, saying: “She will do a good job as a local member … I wish her all the best.” Dutton said France’s late son Henry, who died of leukemia last year, would be proud of his mother’s victory. He added that he was proud of breaking the “one-term curse” in Dickson that had seen the seat regularly change hands between major parties before his victory in 2001. Before Dutton’s loss was confirmed, Coalition finance spokeswoman Jane Hume said it “will be very sad” to see Dutton leave parliament if he loses his seat as the vote returns suggest. “Peter is a very popular colleague among his colleagues,” Hume told Channel Seven. “He is a very good man.”
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73455
‘Very sad’: Dutton loses seat of Dickson in heavy Coalition defeat
Paul Sakkal and Matthew Knott - May 3, 2025
1/2
Peter Dutton has lost his seat of Dickson in suburban Brisbane and become the first federal opposition leader to suffer such a loss in a devastating result for Coalition MPs.
The result has sent a shockwave through the Coalition, which will be in opposition for another term after a heavy loss on Saturday night. Just weeks ago, the Coalition believed Dutton had a serious chance of defeating Anthony Albanese’s Labor government after just one term, but now there is an open contest for the leadership of the Liberal Party.
The Coalition leader was defeated by Labor candidate Ali France, a disability advocate with an amputated leg who had already contested the seat against Dutton twice. She had to overturn a 1.7 per cent margin to win.
Dutton, 54, is the first sitting party leader to lose their seat at an election since then-prime minister John Howard was beaten in Bennelong on the same night he lost government in 2007. Nationals leader Charles Blunt lost his seat of Richmond at the 1990 election, which was won by Labor.
Dutton told Coalition supporters in Brisbane that he had called France to congratulate her on her victory, saying: “She will do a good job as a local member ... I wish her all the best.”
Dutton said France’s late son Henry, who died of leukemia last year, would be proud of his mother’s victory.
He added that he was proud of breaking the “one-term curse” in Dickson that had seen the seat regularly change hands between major parties before his victory in 2001.
Before Dutton’s loss was confirmed, Coalition finance spokeswoman Jane Hume said it “will be very sad” to see Dutton leave parliament if he loses his seat as the vote returns suggest.
“Peter is a very popular colleague among his colleagues,” Hume told Channel Seven. “He is a very good man.”
Liberal frontbencher Dan Tehan left open the possibility of running for the party’s leadership as he lamented the loss of Dutton’s seat.
“If it is confirmed that Peter Dutton has lost his seat, that means it’s an extremely difficult night for us tonight,” he told the ABC. Asked if he would run to lead the party after holding on to his Victorian seat of Wannon despite an energetic independent opponent, Tehan said that “I haven’t had any time to think about the future”.
Shadow attorney-general Michaelia Cash credited Dutton with making the Coalition competitive for most of the past three years after Scott Morrison’s 2022 defeat.
Cash told Channel Nine: “The online campaign by Labor and the Greens against Peter Dutton was probably the most disgusting I have ever seen, and I think that has resonated with people.”
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73457
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22986156 (031216ZMAY25) Notable: COMMENTARY: A calamity for the Coalition and a stunning win for Anthony Albanese - "The significance of Anthony Albanese’s victory is as stunning as it is for the loss of Peter Dutton and potentially his own seat. Yet three months ago it was an unlikely outcome. The Prime Minister has defied his government’s own record of failures and the majority-held view of the electorate that Labor did not deserve to be re-elected because of it. Yet this is what has occurred. For the Coalition this result is a calamity. The Liberals and Nationals now face their own existential questions. The Coalition failed in the seats that Labor rightly feared would fall. It failed in seats it should have kept. It is redeemed only by the few surprise seats that it flipped. But it misread the social dynamic, misread the mood and misread the polls. Three key factors underscore what has occurred. The nation has confirmed that it remains in a post-Covid cycle of government dependency. Labor exploited this to maximum effect. An unwritten agreement continues to exist that while people understand things are bad, as long as their bank accounts keep being topped up, they won’t disturb the equation. This was as much a victory for an addiction to government intervention over aspiration as it was a striking result for the Labor Party campaign machine. Dutton’s defeat represents a complete collapse of the Coalition’s political operation. The turbulence of Trump, the global uncertainty have played to incumbency. This is a complete reversal of the global dynamics that western governments faced 12 months ago. Dutton failed to pivot to this shift. Finally, Labor’s aggressive campaign against Dutton was met with ineffective resistance. Just as Labor positioned Scott Morrison at the last election and won the contest, Labor effectively positioned Dutton as well with an absence of response. At 8pm on Saturday night, it was clear the Coalition was not in a position to win. This would be among the earliest calls on a federal election. This represents the scale of the debacle." - Simon Benson - theaustralian.com.au
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73455
COMMENTARY: A calamity for the Coalition and a stunning win for Anthony Albanese
SIMON BENSON - 3 May 2025
The significance of Anthony Albanese’s victory is as stunning as it is for the loss of Peter Dutton and potentially his own seat.
Yet three months ago it was an unlikely outcome.
The Prime Minister has defied his government’s own record of failures and the majority-held view of the electorate that Labor did not deserve to be re-elected because of it.
Yet this is what has occurred. For the Coalition this result is a calamity. The Liberals and Nationals now face their own existential questions.
The Coalition failed in the seats that Labor rightly feared would fall. It failed in seats it should have kept. It is redeemed only by the few surprise seats that it flipped.
But it misread the social dynamic, misread the mood and misread the polls.
Three key factors underscore what has occurred. The nation has confirmed that it remains in a post-Covid cycle of government dependency. Labor exploited this to maximum effect.
An unwritten agreement continues to exist that while people understand things are bad, as long as their bank accounts keep being topped up, they won’t disturb the equation.
This was as much a victory for an addiction to government intervention over aspiration as it was a striking result for the Labor Party campaign machine.
Dutton’s defeat represents a complete collapse of the Coalition’s political operation.
The turbulence of Trump, the global uncertainty have played to incumbency. This is a complete reversal of the global dynamics that western governments faced 12 months ago.
Dutton failed to pivot to this shift.
Finally, Labor’s aggressive campaign against Dutton was met with ineffective resistance.
Just as Labor positioned Scott Morrison at the last election and won the contest, Labor effectively positioned Dutton as well with an absence of response.
At 8pm on Saturday night, it was clear the Coalition was not in a position to win. This would be among the earliest calls on a federal election.
This represents the scale of the debacle.
As The Australian accurately forecast, the combined primary vote of the major parties is now at a record low. Labor retains government courtesy of the preferences it relies on from the Greens.
For Labor this model has been evident for decades. The Greens as kingmakers of mediocrity.
The Coalition has failed to reconcile the fracturing of its own moderate base.
In trying to appeal to everyone it is appealing to fewer. This election result only confirms this.
https://www.theaustralian.com.au/commentary/a-calamity-for-the-coalition-and-a-stunning-win-for-anthony-albanese/news-story/be46ad82f318fb1a09273fb25c28de2e
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73458
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22986163 (031221ZMAY25) Notable: How Anthony Albanese rediscovered his mojo to deliver election win - Labor MPs at the beginning of this election year had one big fear - Anthony Albanese waiting all the way till May before leading them to a federal election. After a torrid two years of a cost of living crisis, an embarrassing loss at the Indigenous Voice referendum and Peter Dutton on the up and up in the polls, the ALP thought if the Prime Minister waited too long that things would only get worse. “Back then, we were thinking we need to go soon because if we wait until May we’re stuffed,” one Labor insider said. “In the end we were looking at that date in April, which was really the earliest we could have gone because of the WA election, but then there was the cyclone (in Queensland).” On Saturday night, Mr Albanese proved a May election was far from a stuffing. Labor was on its way to a bigger majority than it got in 2022 and the Albanese Government had experienced a resurrection. Mr Albanese has benefited from some significant momentum-boosting moments of the campaign including Peter Dutton’s backflip on key policies and escaping worse-than-average tariffs inflicted by Donald Trump. But government insiders say the Prime Minister rediscovered his mojo months before calling the election, citing an early January test drive through Queensland and a big Medicare play earlier in the year to frame the party’s re-election platform as key to Labor’s rebound.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73455
How Anthony Albanese rediscovered his mojo to deliver election win
SARAH ISON - 3 May 2025
1/2
Labor MPs at the beginning of this election year had one big fear – Anthony Albanese waiting all the way till May before leading them to a federal election.
After a torrid two years of a cost of living crisis, an embarrassing loss at the Indigenous Voice referendum and Peter Dutton on the up and up in the polls, the ALP thought if the Prime Minister waited too long that things would only get worse.
“Back then, we were thinking we need to go soon because if we wait until May we’re stuffed,” one Labor insider said.
“In the end we were looking at that date in April, which was really the earliest we could have gone because of the WA election, but then there was the cyclone (in Queensland).”
On Saturday night, Mr Albanese proved a May election was far from a stuffing. Labor was on its way to a bigger majority than it got in 2022 and the Albanese Government had experienced a resurrection.
Mr Albanese has benefited from some significant momentum-boosting moments of the campaign including Peter Dutton’s backflip on key policies and escaping worse-than-average tariffs inflicted by Donald Trump.
But government insiders say the Prime Minister rediscovered his mojo months before calling the election, citing an early January test drive through Queensland and a big Medicare play earlier in the year to frame the party’s re-election platform as key to Labor’s rebound.
Labor’s 2025 election campaign has been defined in large part by the extreme confidence of its leader, despite Mr Albanese seeking to play down his clear self-assuredness several times in the last five weeks and declaring “nothing was guaranteed” on May 3.
Those sorts of comments followed criticism from the Coalition that the Labor leader had been exuding “smugness” and concerns from those within party ranks that his confidence could lead to the sort of complacency and hubris seen before the ALP lost the “unlosable election” in 2019.
Mr Albanese’s confidence came after a rocky start to the year for the party, with poor polling and many Labor members reporting intense concern about “things going quite badly” and a desire to call the election as early as possible.
Despite the shift in date, ex-cyclone Alfred turned out to be a gift for Mr Albanese, who used it to announce as much support for the state as possible while leaping on Peter Dutton attending a fundraiser in the days leading up to the weather event and was able to brush off the fact he also went to a $10,000 a head dinner at the time.
However, Labor sources agreed Mr Albanese had rediscovered his “mojo” long before the cyclone, with some pointing to the rate cut in late February and others declaring the $8.5bn Medicare announcement was the beginning of the momentum that did not stop building until May 3.
“That big health announcement, the polling within the week or two after that is where it stopped going down … we stemmed the bleed,” one source said.
“From that moment (Mr) Dutton started struggling. (Mr) Albanese got a bit of confidence and the Coalition just had to match (the announcement). That’s when the momentum started.
“We were finally talking about our issues, our message.”
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73459
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22986232 (031256ZMAY25) Notable: COMMENT: The truth about this election is that Anthony Albanese got lucky - "As the Prime Minister marched into a polling booth clutching his long-suffering cavoodle Toto on Saturday, the biggest danger of this election was hanging in the air. Anthony Albanese got lucky. He got lucky that he ran against Scott Morrison when he was popular as dysentery in 2022. The Prime Minister got lucky again when he stuffed up the Voice referendum and the Liberal Party started thinking, “Oh, something is happening, we could win”. Instead, they got complacent. They didn’t do the work. That’s why one Liberal MP described treasury spokesman Angus Taylor as “an absolute disaster” on Saturday night. He got lucky when the Liberal leader wanted to dot the landscape with little nuclear reactors and sack 41,000 public servants. This might be red-meat to the Liberal Party base that already votes for him, but it’s not a huge turn on for swinging voters unless you can explain it properly. He didn’t. The election of Donald Trump? Lucky again. The US President promptly spooked the horses in Australia from the day of his inauguration, with his meeting with the Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, before spraying friends and foes with trade tariffs. He got lucky the Liberals didn’t have a coherent tax policy and promised to repeal tax cuts if elected. Lucky when Peter Dutton had his tyres over-pumped by supporters who inflated his chances of defeating a first term government for the first time since the 1930s. He got lucky that the Liberal leader didn’t have a strategy to inoculate himself from inevitable attacks about his record as health minister on bulk billing. Finally, he got lucky with two wildly popular Labor premiers - first in WA at the 2022 election and now in South Australia. WA saved him from minority government in 2022. Farmers Union Iced Coffee was deployed to do the same in 2025 - as the PM and the SA Premier were photographed downing a carton of the good stuff. The “Mali factor” - the popularity of SA Premier Peter Malinauskas – was expected to deliver the ALP the seat of Sturt in 2025, a blue ribbon seat which hasn’t voted Labor since 1969. Meanwhile, the PM even got lucky when there was a terrible cyclone in Queensland, which gave ALP strategists more time to repair and hand down a budget, something the Liberals insisted he would never do. They were wrong." - Samantha Maiden - news.com.au
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73455
COMMENT: The truth about this election is that Anthony Albanese got lucky
The election results are hiding an uncomfortable truth that Anthony Albanese and the Labor Party need to confront.
Samantha Maiden - May 3, 2025
As the Prime Minister marched into a polling booth clutching his long-suffering cavoodle Toto on Saturday, the biggest danger of this election was hanging in the air.
Anthony Albanese got lucky.
He got lucky that he ran against Scott Morrison when he was popular as dysentery in 2022.
The Prime Minister got lucky again when he stuffed up the Voice referendum and the Liberal Party started thinking, “Oh, something is happening, we could win”.
Instead, they got complacent. They didn’t do the work. That’s why one Liberal MP described treasury spokesman Angus Taylor as “an absolute disaster” on Saturday night.
He got lucky when the Liberal leader wanted to dot the landscape with little nuclear reactors and sack 41,000 public servants.
This might be red-meat to the Liberal Party base that already votes for him, but it’s not a huge turn on for swinging voters unless you can explain it properly. He didn’t.
The election of Donald Trump? Lucky again.
The US President promptly spooked the horses in Australia from the day of his inauguration, with his meeting with the Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, before spraying friends and foes with trade tariffs.
He got lucky the Liberals didn’t have a coherent tax policy and promised to repeal tax cuts if elected.
Lucky when Peter Dutton had his tyres over-pumped by supporters who inflated his chances of defeating a first term government for the first time since the 1930s.
He got lucky that the Liberal leader didn’t have a strategy to inoculate himself from inevitable attacks about his record as health minister on bulk billing.
Finally, he got lucky with two wildly popular Labor premiers – first in WA at the 2022 election and now in South Australia.
WA saved him from minority government in 2022. Farmers Union Iced Coffee was deployed to do the same in 2025 – as the PM and the SA Premier were photographed downing a carton of the good stuff.
The “Mali factor” – the popularity of SA Premier Peter Malinauskas – was expected to deliver the ALP the seat of Sturt in 2025, a blue ribbon seat which hasn’t voted Labor since 1969.
Meanwhile, the PM even got lucky when there was a terrible cyclone in Queensland, which gave ALP strategists more time to repair and hand down a budget, something the Liberals insisted he would never do.
They were wrong. And it turned out they were wrong about more than a few things, including the idea that Australian workers would cheer on his call to march public servants back to the office.
Instead, the mums and dads he wanted to target with the offer of a cut to fuel excise, were up in arms that their bosses would follow suit in the private sector.
Going into Saturday’s election, Labor held a notional 78 seats in Australia’s 150-seat Parliament and the Coalition a notional 57 seats.
The early results suggested the ALP was on track to win enough seats to form a government. A majority government wasn’t locked in.
Instead, there was a surprising swing to Labor across the country, most notably in Peter Dutton’s own seat of Dickson, which was lost to Labor’s Ali France.
What lessons will Anthony Albanese learn from this result? Will he realise that voters were underwhelmed, disappointed and he needs to do better?
Will he realise that he and his government has to change to show voters that they are worthy of the privilege bestowed upon them?
“Cost of living is killing people, and they’re looking for an answer,” Nationals MP Barnaby Joyce observed on election night.
“If they don’t get it this time, by gosh, they’ll get it the next.”
https://www.news.com.au/national/federal-election/the-truth-about-this-election-is-that-anthony-albanese-got-lucky/news-story/9a7a2e768333b3e019cd54725fff659c
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73460
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22986290 (031324ZMAY25) Notable: Keir Starmer Tweet: - Congratulations, @AlboMP on your election win. The UK and Australia are as close as ever - and we will continue to work together to deliver a brighter future for working people in both of our countries.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73455
Keir Starmer Tweet
Congratulations, @AlboMP on your election win.
The UK and Australia are as close as ever — and we will continue to work together to deliver a brighter future for working people in both of our countries.
https://x.com/Keir_Starmer/status/1918639212418445630
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73461
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22986956 (031715ZMAY25) Notable: Volodymyr Zelenskyy Tweet: - Congratulations to Prime Minister @AlboMP on a confident electoral victory. I wish you continued success in serving the people of Australia and delivering meaningful achievements. Ukraine sincerely values Australia’s unwavering support and its principled stance on ending Russia’s war and securing a dignified and lasting peace. We look forward to further strengthening our productive partnership in pursuit of peace, security, and freedom.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73455
Volodymyr Zelenskyy Tweet
Congratulations to Prime Minister @AlboMP on a confident electoral victory. I wish you continued success in serving the people of Australia and delivering meaningful achievements.
Ukraine sincerely values Australia’s unwavering support and its principled stance on ending Russia’s war and securing a dignified and lasting peace. We look forward to further strengthening our productive partnership in pursuit of peace, security, and freedom.
https://x.com/ZelenskyyUa/status/1918662599677288614
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73462
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22986965 (031720ZMAY25) Notable: Emmanuel Macron Tweet: - Congratulations, dear Prime Minister @AlboMP, on your re-election. In the face of global challenges, Australia and France have so much to achieve together - especially in the Indo-Pacific. Let us continue to write, with ambition and friendship, the new chapter of our partnership.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73455
Emmanuel Macron Tweet
Congratulations, dear Prime Minister @AlboMP, on your re-election. In the face of global challenges, Australia and France have so much to achieve together — especially in the Indo-Pacific. Let us continue to write, with ambition and friendship, the new chapter of our partnership.
https://x.com/EmmanuelMacron/status/1918668865191530723
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73463
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22986981 (031728ZMAY25) Notable: Secretary Marco Rubio Tweet: Congratulations to Prime Minister Anthony Albanese on his victory in Australia’s federal election. Australia is a valued U.S. friend and a close partner. We look forward to continuing to promote freedom and security in the Indo-Pacific and around the world.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73455
Secretary Marco Rubio Tweet
Congratulations to Prime Minister Anthony Albanese on his victory in Australia’s federal election. Australia is a valued U.S. friend and a close partner.
We look forward to continuing to promote freedom and security in the Indo-Pacific and around the world.
https://x.com/SecRubio/status/1918692564149952619
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73464
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22989198 (040916ZMAY25) Notable: Foreign Ministry Spokesperson’s Remarks on the Result of the Federal Election of Australia: - China notes the reports and congratulates the Labor Party and Prime Minister Albanese. China stands ready to work with the new Australian government led by Prime Minister Albanese and, under the fundamental guidance provided by the important common understandings between the leaders of the two countries, continue advancing a more mature, stable, and productive comprehensive strategic partnership between China and Australia to further benefit both countries and peoples, and contribute positively to the peace and stability of the region and beyond.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73455
Foreign Ministry Spokesperson’s Remarks on the Result of the Federal Election of Australia
Ministry of Foreign Affairs, The People's Republic of China - MAY 03, 2025
Q: It’s reported that the Australian Labor Party led by Prime Minister Anthony Albanese won the federal election on May 3. What’s your comment?
A: China notes the reports and congratulates the Labor Party and Prime Minister Albanese. China stands ready to work with the new Australian government led by Prime Minister Albanese and, under the fundamental guidance provided by the important common understandings between the leaders of the two countries, continue advancing a more mature, stable, and productive comprehensive strategic partnership between China and Australia to further benefit both countries and peoples, and contribute positively to the peace and stability of the region and beyond.
https://www.fmprc.gov.cn/mfa_eng/xw/fyrbt/202505/t20250503_11615338.html
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73465
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22989207 (040932ZMAY25) Notable: Australia election win seen strengthening Albanese's hand with US - Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese is likely to work more closely with centre-left governments in Britain and Canada, as well as other democratic allies, after a resounding election win strengthened his hand in dealing with the U.S., analysts said. Albanese's Labor Party rode a voter backlash against the policies of U.S. President Donald Trump to a come-from-behind victory that expanded his parliamentary majority, echoing the reelection win a week ago by Canada's ruling party. After his cabinet is sworn in, Albanese is expected to visit Washington for discussions on U.S. tariffs and defence matters, while also working with Asian and European nations to broaden export markets and defence cooperation, hedging against U.S. reliance. Albanese had presented himself to voters as a safe pair of hands amid global turmoil, in contrast to conservative opposition leader Peter Dutton, who was compared to Trump, former strategists for the opposition Liberal Party said in assessing their loss. Treasurer Jim Chalmers said on Sunday there were global challenges ahead for the returned government. "People recognised if you want stability while the global economy was going crazy then a majority Labor government was the best way to deliver that," he said in an interview with the Australian Broadcasting Corporation. Chalmers said his immediate focus was global economic uncertainty, particularly the impact of tariff tensions between the United States, Australia's main security ally, and China, its largest trading partner.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73455
Australia election win seen strengthening Albanese's hand with US
Kirsty Needham - May 4, 2025
1/2
SYDNEY, May 4 (Reuters) - Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese is likely to work more closely with centre-left governments in Britain and Canada, as well as other democratic allies, after a resounding election win strengthened his hand in dealing with the U.S., analysts said.
Albanese's Labor Party rode a voter backlash against the policies of U.S. President Donald Trump to a come-from-behind victory that expanded his parliamentary majority, echoing the reelection win a week ago by Canada's ruling party.
After his cabinet is sworn in, Albanese is expected to visit Washington for discussions on U.S. tariffs and defence matters, while also working with Asian and European nations to broaden export markets and defence cooperation, hedging against U.S. reliance.
Albanese had presented himself to voters as a safe pair of hands amid global turmoil, in contrast to conservative opposition leader Peter Dutton, who was compared to Trump, former strategists for the opposition Liberal Party said in assessing their loss.
Treasurer Jim Chalmers said on Sunday there were global challenges ahead for the returned government.
"People recognised if you want stability while the global economy was going crazy then a majority Labor government was the best way to deliver that," he said in an interview with the Australian Broadcasting Corporation.
Chalmers said his immediate focus was global economic uncertainty, particularly the impact of tariff tensions between the United States, Australia's main security ally, and China, its largest trading partner.
The Labor Party is projected to increase its seats in parliament, strengthening Albanese's position in dealing with the White House, analysts said.
"When the world's most powerful country appears erratic and unreliable, it makes sense to diversify your relationships," said Lowy Institute Executive Director Michael Fullilove, who expects Australia to strengthen ties with Canada, Britain, and other democracies in Europe and Asia.
"None of these countries can replace the United States as Australia's great security ally, however," he added.
While Trump's policies are not popular in Australia, Lowy Institute polling showed 80% of Australians regard the U.S. alliance as important for security.
Noting that Albanese has not yet met Trump in person, Fullilove said: "It's hard to think of two leaders who are more different from each other."
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73466
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22989224 (040942ZMAY25) Notable: Opinion: Dutton was never a Trump clone. But he fell for the trap of MAGA-style politics - "Anthony Albanese has two cyclones to thank for his historic trouncing of the Coalition. Cyclone Alfred’s arrival off the Queensland coast delayed plans for an April election and allowed Labor to use the budget to launch into the election campaign. Even more important was the hurricane-like return of Donald Trump to the White House. Cyclone Donald made landfall in Canada last week, delivering the centre-left Liberal Party a fourth-term victory that seemed impossible at the start of this year. Then he crashed through Australia’s electoral map, demolishing the Coalition’s hopes of victory. The parallels between the two countries, both close American allies, are unmistakable. Canadian Conservative Party leader Pierre Poilievre lost not just the election but his own seat, as did Peter Dutton. Local factors at play in this election - Dutton’s woeful campaign, Albanese’s astuteness, interest rates beginning to fall – were all crucial. But around the world, Albanese’s victory will be interpreted as a repudiation of Trumpism and the latest sign of a revival of social democratic politics. The turnaround from the start of this year has been rapid and remarkable. As Trump’s second inauguration approached on January 20, centre-left parties were grasping for relevance. In an era of high inflation, incumbency had become a curse and left-wing governments were in an especially grim position. Conservative populism was in the ascendancy. Canada’s progressive prince, Justin Trudeau, announced his retirement in January as a beleaguered, unpopular figure. Labor was falling behind the Coalition in the polls, raising the likelihood of a Dutton prime ministership. Trump’s radical and in many ways frightening return to office has breathed new life into centre-left parties and laid a booby trap for conservative leaders. Dutton was never a Trump clone, and notably called him out for berating Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky. But he dabbled in MAGA-style politics by appointing Jacinta Price to an Elon Musk-style government efficiency role, and praised Trump as shrewd and a “big thinker” when he proposed his bizarre plan to turn Gaza into the “Riviera of the Middle East”. Albanese, cleverly, rarely invoked Trump’s name but weaponised his presidency by accusing Dutton of wanting to take Australia down an American-style path on healthcare and wages. With uncertainty roiling the globe, he presented Labor as a beacon of stability and even kindness - a word not associated with Trump’s bullying and bluster. The contrast was largely implicit but impossible to miss." - Matthew Knott - theage.com.au
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73455
Dutton was never a Trump clone. But he fell for the trap of MAGA-style politics
This election was shaped by two forces - Cyclone Alfred and Donald Trump - and neither spared the Liberal Party.
Matthew Knott - MAY 4, 2025
1/2
Anthony Albanese has two cyclones to thank for his historic trouncing of the Coalition.
Cyclone Alfred’s arrival off the Queensland coast delayed plans for an April election and allowed Labor to use the budget to launch into the election campaign. Even more important was the hurricane-like return of Donald Trump to the White House.
Cyclone Donald made landfall in Canada last week, delivering the centre-left Liberal Party a fourth-term victory that seemed impossible at the start of this year. Then he crashed through Australia’s electoral map, demolishing the Coalition’s hopes of victory. The parallels between the two countries, both close American allies, are unmistakable. Canadian Conservative Party leader Pierre Poilievre lost not just the election but his own seat, as did Peter Dutton.
Local factors at play in this election – Dutton’s woeful campaign, Albanese’s astuteness, interest rates beginning to fall – were all crucial. But around the world, Albanese’s victory will be interpreted as a repudiation of Trumpism and the latest sign of a revival of social democratic politics.
The turnaround from the start of this year has been rapid and remarkable. As Trump’s second inauguration approached on January 20, centre-left parties were grasping for relevance. In an era of high inflation, incumbency had become a curse and left-wing governments were in an especially grim position. Conservative populism was in the ascendancy. Canada’s progressive prince, Justin Trudeau, announced his retirement in January as a beleaguered, unpopular figure. Labor was falling behind the Coalition in the polls, raising the likelihood of a Dutton prime ministership.
“Social democratic parties across the world are in disarray,” Emma Dawson, head of the progressive Per Capita think tank, said in January. Public intellectual Clive Hamilton, who founded the left-wing Australia Institute, argued, “there is clearly something profound going on” in global politics. “There’s no doubt that social democratic parties are struggling to sustain their votes,” he said.
Indeed, something profound is happening in global politics, but the opposite of what seemed to be the case just a few months ago. Trump’s radical and in many ways frightening return to office has breathed new life into centre-left parties and laid a booby trap for conservative leaders. Dutton was never a Trump clone, and notably called him out for berating Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky. But he dabbled in MAGA-style politics by appointing Jacinta Price to an Elon Musk-style government efficiency role, and praised Trump as shrewd and a “big thinker” when he proposed his bizarre plan to turn Gaza into the “Riviera of the Middle East”.
Even before any votes had been counted on Saturday night, Liberal frontbencher James Paterson was singling out the Trump factor as a decisive reason for the Coalition’s loss. “I think it has been significant,” Paterson said of Trump’s electoral impact. Of the temptation to echo Trump-style politics, Liberal National senator James McGrath warned late on Saturday night: “We must resist that path.”
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73467
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22989228 (040954ZMAY25) Notable: Defeated Liberals now brace for leadership and policy war - The next leader of the Liberal Party is expected to be Sussan Ley, Angus Taylor or Dan Tehan, as MPs prepare for an internal war on their future policy direction after Peter Dutton led the Coalition to one of its biggest electoral drubbings. Several MPs said the leadership battle would likely be between the deputy Liberal leader, opposition Treasury spokesman and the immigration spokesman, after Mr Dutton lost his seat of Dickson. Conservative Liberal MPs are likely to swing in behind Mr Taylor, but there will be fierce resistance to him being rewarded after failing to outline a coherent economic narrative as Treasury spokesman. While Ms Ley was the deputy Liberal leader under Mr Dutton, some MPs argue she was sidelined from his inner sanctum and would be the Coalition’s best hope of winning back affluent seats lost to the teals and Labor over the past two terms. Coalition MPs told The Australian there needed to be a policy fight early in the next term of parliament, arguing the opposition should have done this after losing in 2022. “We haven’t had the policy debates,” one MP said. There are Liberal MPs who say it was a big mistake to pursue cult-like unity rather than getting the policies right, with Mr Dutton’s leadership marked with a zero-tolerance of any MP who spoke against the party position.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73455
Defeated Liberals now brace for leadership and policy war
Three frontrunners emerge as next leader of the Liberal Party, MPs prepare for an internal battle, after Peter Dutton led the Coalition to one of its biggest electoral drubbings.
GREG BROWN and GEOFF CHAMBERS - 3 May 2025
1/2
The next leader of the Liberal Party is expected to be Sussan Ley, Angus Taylor or Dan Tehan, as MPs prepare for an internal war on their future policy direction after Peter Dutton led the Coalition to one of its biggest electoral drubbings.
Several MPs said the leadership battle would likely be between the deputy Liberal leader, opposition Treasury spokesman and the immigration spokesman, after Mr Dutton lost his seat of Dickson.
A resurgent Anthony Albanese, meanwhile, will have the authority to serve the full term as prime minister and contest a third election.
Conservative Liberal MPs are likely to swing in behind Mr Taylor, but there will be fierce resistance to him being rewarded after failing to outline a coherent economic narrative as Treasury spokesman.
While Ms Ley was the deputy Liberal leader under Mr Dutton, some MPs argue she was sidelined from his inner sanctum and would be the Coalition’s best hope of winning back affluent seats lost to the teals and Labor over the past two terms.
Coalition MPs told The Australian there needed to be a policy fight early in the next term of parliament, arguing the opposition should have done this after losing in 2022.
“We haven’t had the policy debates,” one MP said.
There are Liberal MPs who say it was a big mistake to pursue cult-like unity rather than getting the policies right, with Mr Dutton’s leadership marked with a zero-tolerance of any MP who spoke against the party position.
While Mr Taylor’s failure to execute an economic narrative was blamed in some quarters for the loss, other MPs believe the leaking against the Treasury spokesman was the beginning of the downfall for the Coalition’s campaign.
The Australian reported weeks out from the election being called there was dismay within Coalition ranks of the lack of policy offering and the performance of Mr Taylor.
One MP said the Coalition had “walked away” from its principles by embracing Labor’s big spending while offering the sugar hit of one-off tax cuts.
Another MP said the cost-of-living policies were announced too late, with the campaign reactive to what was being announced by the Prime Minister.
“It was pretty clear that people wanted a change, we just didn’t give them a reason,” one Liberal figure said.
Mr Tehan — who was on the outer under the leadership of Mr Dutton given his personal ambitions — would not say on Saturday night whether he would run as leader.
“I haven’t thought about it,” Mr Tehan told Sky News.
Mr Tehan, when asked whether nuclear energy would continue to be a part of the Coalition policy platform going into the future, said there needed to be a “root and branch” review of the election loss and that the party must “consider everything that has happened”.
Mr Taylor said the Liberal Party has “much to reflect on” in the wake of Labor’s win.
“It’s been a tough night for Liberals across the country – especially for Peter Dutton, a great friend who has served our party and our nation for more than two decades,” Mr Taylor wrote on X.
“There are still significant votes to be counted, but it is clear for the millions of Australians looking to the Liberal Party for a brighter future we have much to reflect on.”
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73468
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22989242 (041019ZMAY25) Notable: Video: Jewish leaders congratulate Labor on win, hail Greens’ ‘electoral punishment’ - Jewish leaders have praised voters for the “electoral punishment” given to the Greens, while hailing the re-election of Anthony Albanese and Labor’s historic return to government in a thumping landslide. Tensions between Australia’s Jewish community and the Albanese government have deepened since the October 7 Hamas attacks, but with Labor’s return to office, Jewish leaders say there is now a chance to rebuild trust and ensure the government follows through on its promises to combat anti-Semitism. Labor’s Mark Dreyfus, Josh Burns and Mike Freelander, along with Liberal MP Julian Leeser, all retained their seats on election day - a result welcomed by leaders as a sign of support for Jewish representation across party lines. The most Jewish-heavy electorates in the country delivered higher Liberal primary votes and a repudiation of the Greens in Saturday’s election compared to figures from the rest of the country. In the four seats with the highest proportion of Jewish voters, the Liberal primary vote fell by just 0.4 percentage points, 3.4 points better than the national average. The Greens’ primary vote dropped by 1.7 points across these seats, also outperforming the national slump. Zionist Federation of Australia president Jeremy Leibler described the election as taking place during a “deeply painful period” for Jewish Australians, with many in the community experiencing unprecedented levels of insecurity. Prominent Israeli community leader Menachem Vorchheimer also said the election marked a “clear rejection of the Greens”. Mr Vorchheimer, who hit the Greens with a human rights complaint alleging failures to address overt anti-Semitism at anti-Israel protests they attended, said the minor party was now “hanging by a thread”.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73455
Jewish leaders congratulate Labor on win, hail Greens’ ‘electoral punishment’
MOHAMMAD ALFARES and NOAH YIM - 4 May 2025
1/2
Jewish leaders have praised voters for the “electoral punishment” given to the Greens, while hailing the re-election of Anthony Albanese and Labor’s historic return to government in a thumping landslide.
Tensions between Australia’s Jewish community and the Albanese government have deepened since the October 7 Hamas attacks, but with Labor’s return to office, Jewish leaders say there is now a chance to rebuild trust and ensure the government follows through on its promises to combat anti-Semitism.
Labor’s Mark Dreyfus, Josh Burns and Mike Freelander, along with Liberal MP Julian Leeser, all retained their seats on election day — a result welcomed by leaders as a sign of support for Jewish representation across party lines.
The most Jewish-heavy electorates in the country delivered higher Liberal primary votes and a repudiation of the Greens in Saturday’s election compared to figures from the rest of the country.
In the four seats with the highest proportion of Jewish voters — based on The Australian’s recalculation of census data post-redistribution — the Liberal primary vote fell by just 0.4 percentage points, 3.4 points better than the national average. The Greens’ primary vote dropped by 1.7 points across these seats, also outperforming the national slump.
For example, in teal independent-held Wentworth, which at 12.1 per cent has the highest share in the country of people who report Judaism as their religion, there was a one percentage point slump in the already low primary vote for the Greens. In Labor-held Macnamara, the second-highest Jewish population in the country at 10.1 per cent, there was a 1.5 percentage point slump in the Greens primary vote.
The Greens suffered a seats defeat at the federal election on Saturday night, with the possibility the minor party will lose all three of the seats in Queensland it won for the first time at the 2022 election and fail to make any of the gains it had hoped to. The party’s share of the national votes was slightly lower at about 12 per cent in Sunday counting.
Even party leader Adam Bandt was enduring a scare in his safe seat of Melbourne, as Liberal preferences flowing to Labor shook his hold on the seat he first won in 2010.
Co-chief executive of the peak Jewish body Peter Wertheim said the Executive Council Australian Jewry had formally congratulated the Prime Minister and looked forward to continuing the “good, mutually respectful relationship”.
“We will continue to urge the government to stand strong against anti-Semitism in both word and deed,“ Mr Wertheim told The Australian.
“Where we have different views on the best way towards a sustainable two-state outcome to the Israel-Palestinian conflict, we will continue to put our case to the government in a constructive and reasoned manner.
“The election results have made it abundantly clear that the Australian people are looking for pragmatism, and have less and less time for ideologues of any kind.
“The electoral punishment meted out by the voters to the Greens and other ideologically-driven special interest groups is particularly noteworthy,” Mr Wertheim said.
“It is gratifying that each of the sitting Jewish MPs Josh Burns, Julian Leeser, Mike Freelander and Mark Dreyfus will be returned, and we congratulate them,“ he said.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73469
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22989251 (041027ZMAY25) Notable: Analysis: The sheer drama of this victory cannot hide the trouble for the future - "Historic. Stunning. Extraordinary. There is no way to convey the sheer drama of this election result without reaching for words that sound overblown. But the victory for Anthony Albanese and his Labor colleagues is an incredible moment. Albanese has shocked many of his own supporters with the scale of their success and the way they have driven Peter Dutton and the Coalition into the ground. The opposition leader has lost his seat in parliament and some of his shadow ministers are heading the same way. The survivors will form a Liberal rump, searching for leadership, and the recriminations will be savage. The story of the campaign is simple: Labor prepared with care and fought with discipline; the Coalition planned complacently and fought atrociously. The story of the election, however, is complex: Labor achieved its goal of increasing its majority - emphatically – but faces a severe challenge in lifting a jaded electorate that is so bruised by the pressure on household finances. Dutton sought to frame Albanese as a weak leader in the worst government since the 1970s, but the polls found that voters returned to Labor and its leader after drifting away last year over the economy. The election twisted all the old attack lines. Albanese outlined a big agenda and threw himself into a strong campaign, while Dutton hedged for too long and presided over a weak and shambolic campaign. If there is a word for this Labor victory, it is certainly not weak. But the campaign drama cannot hide the danger signs for the future. It is not just that Trump is proving that Australia can no longer rely on its great ally - it is that he ushers in an era of economic turmoil and strategic danger. The economy is not robust enough, productivity is not high enough, the budget is not strong enough and our political decisions are not tough enough for the times. Albanese and Chalmers are returned to their jobs with an emphatic victory. But everything at this election proves that their jobs will not get any easier." - David Crowe - theage.com.au
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73455
Analysis: The sheer drama of this victory cannot hide the trouble for the future
David Crowe - May 3, 2025
Historic. Stunning. Extraordinary. There is no way to convey the sheer drama of this election result without reaching for words that sound overblown. But the victory for Anthony Albanese and his Labor colleagues is an incredible moment.
Albanese has shocked many of his own supporters with the scale of their success and the way they have driven Peter Dutton and the Coalition into the ground.
The opposition leader has lost his seat in parliament and some of his shadow ministers are heading the same way. The survivors will form a Liberal rump, searching for leadership, and the recriminations will be savage.
The story of the campaign is simple: Labor prepared with care and fought with discipline; the Coalition planned complacently and fought atrociously.
The story of the election, however, is complex: Labor achieved its goal of increasing its majority – emphatically – but faces a severe challenge in lifting a jaded electorate that is so bruised by the pressure on household finances.
Dutton sought to frame Albanese as a weak leader in the worst government since the 1970s, but the polls found that voters returned to Labor and its leader after drifting away last year over the economy.
The election twisted all the old attack lines. Albanese outlined a big agenda and threw himself into a strong campaign, while Dutton hedged for too long and presided over a weak and shambolic campaign.
If there is a word for this Labor victory, it is certainly not weak.
The media dynamic was part of this outcome. The defeat for the Coalition is so severe, so powerful, that the conservatives and their supporters must confront a question: how did they delude themselves into thinking they had a successful agenda when they were failing all along?
Dutton and the Liberals argued for three years that the media was too hard on them. In fact, the media was too soft. Dutton was not placed under enough scrutiny during the term – mostly because he dismissed the “hate media” and spoke to friendly media instead. He avoided questions from the media he did not like.
This made it astonishingly easy for the Liberals to convince themselves they were a gift to voters, because Sky News and others told them so. Dutton achieved much by keeping the Coalition together in the past three years. But he never faced the “stress test” he needed, and it showed during the campaign.
Caught up in their inflated anger at the other side, the Coalition campaigned as if they had a right to return to power – not as if they had to fight to deserve every vote.
US President Donald Trump overshadowed the election with every edict from the White House, not least his April 2 decision to impose tariffs on Australia and other countries, throwing global growth into doubt and markets into freefall.
Australians were drawn to safety and security in the Trump era, and they turned to Albanese. This makes it easy to suggest the prime minister got lucky, like his Canadian counterpart, Mark Carney, who also won this week. In fact, Albanese was positioning himself for three years as a safe and “orderly” leader. He was an anti-Trump before Trump returned to the White House.
Was Labor saved by the cyclone? The arrival of Cyclone Alfred off the Queensland coast shaped the timing of the election. It made a federal budget necessary on March 25 – an event some of those around Treasurer Jim Chalmers did not expect. And yet, the budget helped Labor outline an agenda for the term ahead.
The cut to personal taxes turned into a masterstroke when Dutton chose to oppose it – an unbelievable move that meant the Liberal Party was no longer the party of lower taxes.
But the campaign drama cannot hide the danger signs for the future. It is not just that Trump is proving that Australia can no longer rely on its great ally – it is that he ushers in an era of economic turmoil and strategic danger.
The economy is not robust enough, productivity is not high enough, the budget is not strong enough and our political decisions are not tough enough for the times.
Albanese and Chalmers are returned to their jobs with an emphatic victory. But everything at this election proves that their jobs will not get any easier.
https://www.theage.com.au/politics/federal/the-colour-of-this-campaign-cannot-hide-the-danger-signs-for-the-future-20250502-p5lw1u.html
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73470
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22992823 (050936ZMAY25) Notable: Demands for quotas as three post-Dutton leadership options firm - Three senior Liberals are courting support among their colleagues to take over from Peter Dutton as both conservative heavyweight Tony Abbott and leading moderate Simon Birmingham urge the Liberal Party to democratise how it picks candidates. Deputy leader Sussan Ley, shadow treasurer Angus Taylor and immigration spokesman Dan Tehan were all speaking to colleagues on Sunday about a leadership role, according to half a dozen MPs unable to speak publicly about the private discussions. Whoever wins the leadership contest will run a party that has recorded the worst result in its history and is now facing calls for dramatic action, including Birmingham’s demand for the party to introduce “fast and ambitious” quotas to recruit women. As the party reels from a generational loss, two sources close to defence spokesman Andrew Hastie said the West Australian, who had been touted as “leadership material” by colleagues, was unlikely to run and would instead bide his time. Taylor, 59, has the support of the large national right-wing faction and is therefore in the box seat to seize control of the party, even though he has received severe criticism for the opposition’s economic agenda. Tehan managed to fend off a Climate 200-backed challenge in his regional Victorian seat of Wannon, which could bolster his credentials, while Ley’s path to the leadership could be assisted by the NSW moderate faction’s aversion to Taylor, from the state’s right.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73455
Demands for quotas as three post-Dutton leadership options firm
Paul Sakkal - May 4, 2025
1/2
Three senior Liberals are courting support among their colleagues to take over from Peter Dutton as both conservative heavyweight Tony Abbott and leading moderate Simon Birmingham urge the Liberal Party to democratise how it picks candidates.
Deputy leader Sussan Ley, shadow treasurer Angus Taylor and immigration spokesman Dan Tehan were all speaking to colleagues on Sunday about a leadership role, according to half a dozen MPs unable to speak publicly about the private discussions.
Whoever wins the leadership contest will run a party that has recorded the worst result in its history and is now facing calls for dramatic action, including Birmingham’s demand for the party to introduce “fast and ambitious” quotas to recruit women.
As the party reels from a generational loss, two sources close to defence spokesman Andrew Hastie said the West Australian, who had been touted as “leadership material” by colleagues, was unlikely to run and would instead bide his time.
Taylor, 59, has the support of the large national right-wing faction and is therefore in the box seat to seize control of the party, even though he has received severe criticism for the opposition’s economic agenda.
Tehan managed to fend off a Climate 200-backed challenge in his regional Victorian seat of Wannon, which could bolster his credentials, while Ley’s path to the leadership could be assisted by the NSW moderate faction’s aversion to Taylor, from the state’s right.
MPs loyal to Taylor claimed on Sunday that he was not to blame for failing to win the economic argument because, they said, Dutton and his office blocked Taylor’s wishes to offer income tax cuts and pursue a more ambitious agenda.
Ley released a statement on behalf of the party on Sunday afternoon, saying MPs would meet to elect new leaders after counting in tight seats, including the Victorian electorate of Goldstein where Tim Wilson is confident of defeating teal Zoe Daniel, was finished.
Ley praised Dutton for his “outstanding service to Australia”. “Today, our thoughts are also with many Liberal colleagues who have lost their seats,” she said in the written statement that did not explicitly address the leadership question.
Talented MPs and prominent frontbenchers such as Michael Sukkar and David Coleman lost their seats in the bloodbath, with top party sources expecting the party’s pollster Freshwater Research to be dumped after a major polling miss.
The moderates’ power in the Coalition could fall further after this weekend because five of their members have lost their seats, while the more conservative Nationals lost only one seat, entitling it to increase its share in the shadow cabinet.
Abbott, whose big 2013 win is likely to be nearly matched by Anthony Albanese’s effort, told this masthead the party needed to dump its hyper-factional modus operandi, calling for more democratic pre-selections to pick better candidates.
“Quite apart from any issues with the overall strategy of the campaign, close to the heart of our long-term problem is our diminishing and ageing party base,” said Abbott, who is now a director of Fox Corporation in the US. “Yet it’s hard to recall any senior party person ever appealing to the public to join the party and make a difference, presumably because that would shake up current factional arrangements.”
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73471
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22992834 (050946ZMAY25) Notable: Angus Taylor, Donald Trump blamed for Coalition’s devastating defeat - Liberal senator Hollie Hughes has ripped into shadow treasurer Angus Taylor, saying he is incapable of leading the party and failed to deliver any economic ideas for the Coalition’s disastrous election campaign. Party members have flocked to the airwaves on Monday morning to explain why Opposition Leader Peter Dutton suffered a catastrophic loss in Saturday’s election, including his own seat, as the Coalition is expected to fall to fewer than 45 seats in parliament. This masthead reported in June last year the extraordinary rift between Hughes and Taylor as she blamed him for bumping her down on the Senate ticket. The NSW senator quipped on ABC Radio National that, while she is set to leave parliament in June this year, she will have a vote for the next Liberal leader as she slammed Taylor. “We had zero economic policy to sell. I don’t know what [Taylor’s] been doing for three years. There was no tax policy, there was no economic narrative,” she said. Hughes argued that Treasurer Jim Chalmers skated through with no scrutiny from Taylor over the government’s big spending pledges and ballooning deficit. Hughes told Radio National and Sky that, as the former shadow assistant minister for mental health, she had submitted “seven fully costed policies” to the shadow expenditure review committee and never heard back from anyone. “Policies that had been developed, had been costed, just seemed to disappear into a vortex,” she said, adding that she had heard similar stories from colleagues.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73455
Angus Taylor, Donald Trump blamed for Coalition’s devastating defeat
Olivia Ireland and Daniel Lo Surdo - May 5, 2025
1/2
Liberal senator Hollie Hughes has ripped into shadow treasurer Angus Taylor, saying he is incapable of leading the party and failed to deliver any economic ideas for the Coalition’s disastrous election campaign.
Party members have flocked to the airwaves on Monday morning to explain why Opposition Leader Peter Dutton suffered a catastrophic loss in Saturday’s election, including his own seat, as the Coalition is expected to fall to fewer than 45 seats in parliament.
While Hughes openly questioned the leadership capabilities of Taylor, others pointed to the shadow thrown on the Coalition’s campaign by US President Donald Trump’s chaotic first 100 days in office.
Taylor, Deputy Opposition Leader Sussan Ley and immigration spokesman Dan Tehan are all in the running to become the new Liberal leader.
As the party reels from a generational loss, two sources close to defence spokesman Andrew Hastie said the West Australian, who had been touted as “leadership material” by colleagues, was unlikely to run and would instead bide his time.
This masthead reported in June last year the extraordinary rift between Hughes and Taylor as she blamed him for bumping her down on the Senate ticket.
The NSW senator quipped on ABC Radio National that, while she is set to leave parliament in June this year, she will have a vote for the next Liberal leader as she slammed Taylor.
“We had zero economic policy to sell. I don’t know what [Taylor’s] been doing for three years. There was no tax policy, there was no economic narrative,” she said.
Hughes argued that Treasurer Jim Chalmers skated through with no scrutiny from Taylor over the government’s big spending pledges and ballooning deficit.
Hughes told Radio National and Sky that, as the former shadow assistant minister for mental health, she had submitted “seven fully costed policies” to the shadow expenditure review committee and never heard back from anyone.
“Policies that had been developed, had been costed, just seemed to disappear into a vortex,” she said, adding that she had heard similar stories from colleagues.
“To be the opposition leader, you need to be very capable in the media. You need to be able to sell a message. You need to be able to put the narrative together, and you need to be able to bring the team together,” she said.
“I have concerns about his capabilities, but that is shared by a huge number of my colleagues, and [there’s a] frustration that they didn’t have economic narratives that they could push and sell during the election.
“Going from shadow treasurer to opposition leader, I’m not quite sure that’s going to change.”
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73472
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22992843 (050950ZMAY25) Notable: Video: Trump calls Albanese after saying he had ‘no idea’ who PM’s opponent was in election - US President Donald Trump called Prime Minister Anthony Albanese to congratulate him on his election victory, and the two men had a “warm and positive” conversation canvassing trade and the AUKUS security pact, Albanese said. The phone call paves the way for a future in-person meeting, possibly at next month’s G7 meeting in Canada, which Albanese confirmed he would attend as an invited guest, or in Washington. “I thanked him for his very warm message of congratulations,” Albanese said. “We talked about AUKUS and tariffs. We’ll continue to engage. We’ll engage with each other on a face-to-face basis at some time in the future … I thanked him for reaching out in such a positive way. “I won’t go into all of the personal comments that he made. But he was very generous in his personal warmth and praise towards myself. He was fully aware of the outcome, and he expressed the desire to continue to work with me in the future.” The two spoke by phone about 11am, Canberra time, shortly after Trump returned to Washington from his weekend home in Florida. Upon disembarking the US Marine Corps helicopter at the White House, Trump praised Albanese when asked by this masthead about the Australian election. “Albanese, I’m very friendly with,” Trump said. “I don’t know anything about the election other than the man that won, he’s very good.” Asked about Albanese’s description of Trump’s tariffs as “not the act of a friend”, and whether they would soon speak, Trump said: “I can only say that he’s been very, very nice to me, very respectful to me. “I have no idea who the other person is that ran against him, and, you know, we [Albanese and I] have had a very good relationship.”
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73455
Trump calls Albanese after saying he had ‘no idea’ who PM’s opponent was in election
Michael Koziol - May 5, 2025
1/2
Washington: US President Donald Trump called Prime Minister Anthony Albanese to congratulate him on his election victory, and the two men had a “warm and positive” conversation canvassing trade and the AUKUS security pact, Albanese said.
The phone call paves the way for a future in-person meeting, possibly at next month’s G7 meeting in Canada, which Albanese confirmed he would attend as an invited guest, or in Washington.
“I thanked him for his very warm message of congratulations,” Albanese said. “We talked about AUKUS and tariffs. We’ll continue to engage. We’ll engage with each other on a face-to-face basis at some time in the future ... I thanked him for reaching out in such a positive way.
“I won’t go into all of the personal comments that he made. But he was very generous in his personal warmth and praise towards myself. He was fully aware of the outcome, and he expressed the desire to continue to work with me in the future.”
The two spoke by phone about 11am, Canberra time, shortly after Trump returned to Washington from his weekend home in Florida. Upon disembarking the US Marine Corps helicopter at the White House, Trump praised Albanese when asked by this masthead about the Australian election.
“Albanese, I’m very friendly with,” Trump said. “I don’t know anything about the election other than the man that won, he’s very good.”
Asked about Albanese’s description of Trump’s tariffs as “not the act of a friend”, and whether they would soon speak, Trump said: “I can only say that he’s been very, very nice to me, very respectful to me.
“I have no idea who the other person is that ran against him, and, you know, we [Albanese and I] have had a very good relationship.”
Trump said he did not know whether he had an impact on the Australian election result. Some analysts have suggested the Coalition’s declining popularity could be partly attributed to an association with the US president and his conservative policies, or voters flocking to the incumbent due to the uncertainty created by Trump.
A White House readout of the phone call was not immediately available, and the president had not yet posted about the call on his Truth Social page, as he sometimes does when he speaks to world leaders.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73473
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22998090 (060910ZMAY25) Notable: Video: Federal Election 2025: Teal MP Zoe Daniel loses seat of Goldstein as Sky News calls seat for Liberal candidate Tim Wilson - Teal MP Zoe Daniel has lost her seat of Goldstein, after claiming victory and celebrating too early on election night. Sky News called the closely watched electorate for Liberal candidate Tim Wilson on Tuesday at 2.07pm. The call marks a dramatic reversal of fortune for Ms Daniel, after she declared victory on Saturday night to cheers, confetti, and the sound of Sia’s pop song, Titanium. Ms Daniel's early lead vanished after postal vote counts heavily favoured Mr Wilson, giving him the lead. She posted to social media after falling behind that she would "keep dancing" while awaiting the result. “It’s a resilience test that’s for sure, but no matter what we will keep dancing,” she said. Comments were turned off for the video. Sky News Chief Election Analyst Tom Connell confirmed that with thousands of postal votes breaking decisively for the Liberals, Ms Daniel cannot recover. “The best case scenario for Zoe Daniel right now … would be something like getting within 500 votes,” he said. “Tim Wilson will be returned to parliament, he will be the first Liberal MP to so far gain a seat - not from Labor but from Climate 200.”
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73455
Federal Election 2025: Teal MP Zoe Daniel loses seat of Goldstein as Sky News calls seat for Liberal candidate Tim Wilson
Teal MP Zoe Daniel has lost the seat of Goldstein after claiming victory too soon, as Sky News declares victory for Liberal candidate Tim Wilson.
Oscar Godsell - May 6, 2025
Teal MP Zoe Daniel has lost her seat of Goldstein, after claiming victory and celebrating too early on election night.
Sky News called the closely watched electorate for Liberal candidate Tim Wilson on Tuesday at 2.07pm.
The call marks a dramatic reversal of fortune for Ms Daniel, after she declared victory on Saturday night to cheers, confetti, and the sound of Sia’s pop song, Titanium.
Ms Daniel's early lead vanished after postal vote counts heavily favoured Mr Wilson, giving him the lead.
She posted to social media after falling behind that she would "keep dancing" while awaiting the result.
“It’s a resilience test that’s for sure, but no matter what we will keep dancing,” she said.
Comments were turned off for the video.
Sky News Chief Election Analyst Tom Connell confirmed that with thousands of postal votes breaking decisively for the Liberals, Ms Daniel cannot recover.
“The best case scenario for Zoe Daniel right now ... would be something like getting within 500 votes,” he said.
“Tim Wilson will be returned to parliament, he will be the first Liberal MP to so far gain a seat—not from Labor but from Climate 200.”
The seat of Goldstein was one of the signature wins for Climate 200 in the 2022 election, when Ms Daniel, unseated Mr Wilson in the once-safe Liberal seat.
Climate 200 invested more than $500,000 in Ms Daniel’s 2025 re-election campaign, with Goldstein one of its most high-profile contests.
Ms Daniel had taken to the stage on election night, thanking supporters and declaring, “hope wins”.
She was forced to walk back the celebration on Monday, admitting the race was “not clear yet unfortunately”.
The come-from-behind win has returned Goldstein to the Liberal fold, and Mr Wilson reclaims the seat he held from 2016 to 2022.
https://www.skynews.com.au/australia-news/politics/federal-election-2025-teal-mp-zoe-daniel-loses-seat-of-goldstein-as-sky-news-calls-seat-for-liberal-candidate-tim-wilson/news-story/748c7acaa1a3c0107600302be51ad533
https://www.instagram.com/reel/DJQ4kEqTvZL/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TtwU2f9e2iU
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73474
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22998096 (060914ZMAY25) Notable: Video: Greens leader Adam Bandt in danger of losing Melbourne seat as preferencing swings in Labor's favour - Greens leader Adam Bandt is in danger of losing his seat of Melbourne as Liberal preferences look to boost the Labor candidate's chances of claiming victory. A decision by the Liberals to preference the party last may help to see all the Greens' House of Representatives seats turn red, with the Greens leader among those to potentially fall victim. The two-candidate preferred count is currently swaying in Labor candidate Sarah Witty's favour, with a swing of 10.89 per cent and a 985 vote margin over Mr Bandt. The Greens leader came out in top in first preference votes in the seat with 41 per cent, with Ms Witty receiving 31.43 per cent and Liberal’s Steph Hunt getting 18.57 per cent. But Mr Bandt could be in danger if Labor continues to edge higher with help from Liberal Party preferences. Sky News Chief Election Analyst Tom Connell said Ms Witty has a “chance of winning” the seat as Labor will get a “strong preference” from the Liberal Party. “Labor on 31 (per cent) would not be competitive without preferences from the Liberal Party,” Connell said. The Greens are yet to officially win any seats in the 2025 federal election, but the party is having an impact on Labor’s tally, particularly in Brisbane electorates.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73455
Greens leader Adam Bandt in danger of losing Melbourne seat as preferencing swings in Labor's favour
Greens leader Adam Bandt is edging closer to losing his once safe seat of Melbourne as Liberal preferences help Labor take the lead.
Matt Hampson - May 6, 2025
Greens leader Adam Bandt is in danger of losing his seat of Melbourne as Liberal preferences look to boost the Labor candidate's chances of claiming victory.
A decision by the Liberals to preference the party last may help to see all the Greens' House of Representatives seats turn red, with the Greens leader among those to potentially fall victim.
The two-candidate preferred count is currently swaying in Labor candidate Sarah Witty's favour, with a swing of 10.89 per cent and a 985 vote margin over Mr Bandt.
The Greens leader came out in top in first preference votes in the seat with 41 per cent, with Ms Witty receiving 31.43 per cent and Liberal’s Steph Hunt getting 18.57 per cent.
But Mr Bandt could be in danger if Labor continues to edge higher with help from Liberal Party preferences.
Sky News Chief Election Analyst Tom Connell said Ms Witty has a “chance of winning” the seat as Labor will get a “strong preference” from the Liberal Party.
“Labor on 31 (per cent) would not be competitive without preferences from the Liberal Party,” Connell said.
The Greens are yet to officially win any seats in the 2025 federal election, but the party is having an impact on Labor’s tally, particularly in Brisbane electorates.
In the seat of Ryan, which was previously held by the Greens, MP Elizabeth Watson-Brown trailed LNP candidate Maggie Forrest in the primary vote.
“Either Labor will help the Greens win that seat off the LNP, even though the LNP have the most votes, or if Labor get second, the Greens will help Labor win that seat,” Connell said.
“So no matter what, even though the LNP are at the top there, they will not win that seat.”
Meanwhile, the previously Green-held seat of Griffith has swung to Labor. Greens preferences in the seat of Brisbane is pushing Labor candidate Madonna Jarret to victory.
Mr Bandt on Saturday attributed several Labor seats to Liberal preferencing.
"This support across the country has pushed the Greens to our highest vote ever, returning all our Senators, and putting us in position to win between one and four seats, even during an overwhelming swing to the government," Mr Bandt said on Saturday.
"The historic collapse in the Liberal vote has meant that Labor will win the seats of Griffith with Liberal preferences, and Brisbane too, even as our vote held firm."
Labor put the Greens second or third in almost every seat they contested in the Parliament.
https://www.skynews.com.au/australia-news/politics/greens-leader-adam-bandt-in-danger-of-losing-melbourne-seat-as-preferencing-swings-in-labors-favour/news-story/4c308c97c02cdd9c3bd4b292d369d038
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qiaOcPNvsyU
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73475
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/22998144 (060935ZMAY25) Notable: Relief in Canberra as Solomon Islands PM Jeremiah Manele averts no-confidence vote - Solomon Islands Prime Minister Jeremiah Manele has averted a high-stakes no-confidence vote led by his pro-Beijing predecessor Manasseh Sogavare after a day of political manoeuvring that had the capital Honiara on high alert and Canberra braced for a potential setback in its Pacific strategy. The move by at least 10 defector MPs, including four-time former prime minister Sogavare, threatened to plunge the Pacific Island country back into political turmoil and derail the Albanese government’s flagship $190m policing program for the Solomons designed to limit China’s growing reach in the country’s security sector. The rogue group - which included key opposition figures Matthew Wale and another former prime minister, Gordon Darcy Lilo, who tabled the no-confidence motion in parliament last week – claimed to command a slim majority in the 50-seat parliament. But Mr Manele appeared to have headed off the putsch by Monday night when he released a photo which showed him standing with 27 MPs, suggesting he had coaxed several back into the government fold. By Tuesday morning it became clear the no-confidence motion had been omitted from the day’s parliamentary schedule, prompting speaker Patteson Oti to adjourn parliament until 2pm (local time) when he announced the vote had been withdrawn. That will have come as a relief to the Albanese government, which has worked well with Mr Manele since he replaced the combative Mr Sogavare last May.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73421
>>73422
>>73423
Relief in Canberra as Solomon Islands PM Jeremiah Manele averts no-confidence vote
AMANDA HODGE - 6 May 2025
Solomon Islands Prime Minister Jeremiah Manele has averted a high-stakes no-confidence vote led by his pro-Beijing predecessor Manasseh Sogavare after a day of political manoeuvring that had the capital Honiara on high alert and Canberra braced for a potential setback in its Pacific strategy.
The move by at least 10 defector MPs, including four-time former prime minister Sogavare, threatened to plunge the Pacific Island country back into political turmoil and derail the Albanese government’s flagship $190m policing program for the Solomons designed to limit China’s growing reach in the country’s security sector.
The rogue group – which included key opposition figures Matthew Wale and another former prime minister, Gordon Darcy Lilo, who tabled the no-confidence motion in parliament last week – claimed to command a slim majority in the 50-seat parliament.
But Mr Manele appeared to have headed off the putsch by Monday night when he released a photo which showed him standing with 27 MPs, suggesting he had coaxed several back into the government fold.
By Tuesday morning it became clear the no-confidence motion had been omitted from the day’s parliamentary schedule, prompting speaker Patteson Oti to adjourn parliament until 2pm (local time) when he announced the vote had been withdrawn.
That will have come as a relief to the Albanese government, which has worked well with Mr Manele since he replaced the combative Mr Sogavare last May.
Leadership challenges are hardly uncommon in Solomons, but regional analysts say the timing of this latest putsch is notable.
Honiara is due to host the Pacific Islands Forum in September, an annual summit which in recent years has been marred by open conflict between Taiwan, a long-time PIF development partner, and China, a dialogue partner that has been pushing hard to flip Pacific loyalties away from Taipei. It was under Mr Sogavare that the Solomons switched diplomatic allegiance from Taipei to Beijing in 2019.
In April 2022 he signed a security pact with Beijing, which Penny Wong, the then opposition foreign spokeswoman, described as “the worst foreign policy blunder in the Pacific that Australia has seen since the end of World War II”.
Senator Wong refused to buy into the issue on Tuesday, telling Radio National they were “matters for the people and the parliament of the Solomon Islands”.
Taiwan’s diplomatic allies in the Pacific, including Palau president Surangel Whipps jnr, have been lobbying Mr Manele to allow a Taipei delegation to attend the meeting, something China will be working hard to prevent.
Pacific island nation leaders are also due to discuss the largely-Australian funded Pacific policing initiative at the summit, a program designed to help reduce their reliance on China by bolstering their own regional security capacity.
“China would be looking for every opportunity to derail that,” Lowy Institute Pacific Islands Program director Mihai Sora told The Australian on Tuesday.
Mr Manele had “made commitments to Micronesian leaders who recognise Taiwan … so there are international stakes here also”, Mr Sora added.
“The fact the Solomon Islands hosts the PIF meeting in September means they have a great deal of influence on how it is run, who gets access and who gets visas issued on time to attend. That affects the Taiwan question, and Pacific policing initiative as well as Australia’s effort to significantly boost its police relationship with the Solomon Islands.”
The Australian government launched it new flagship policing program for Solomon Islands in December, committing more than $190m to recruiting and training more police to boost domestic security.
The program – not yet finalised – is widely seen as a response to the controversial 2022 China-Solomon Islands security deal which allows Beijing to deploy armed police, military personnel and other law enforcement forces” as needed.
Prime Minister Anthony Albanese made it a first-term foreign policy priority to repair Australia’s relationships in the region, rolling out a series of programs and high dollar commitments largely aimed at limiting China’s security ambitions in the Pacific Islands.
Australia is already the largest donor to the Pacific but is under further pressure to increase its support to the region in the wake of the Trump administration’s closure of USAid, a major contributor to development aid.
https://www.theaustralian.com.au/world/relief-in-canberra-as-solomon-islands-pm-jeremiah-manele-averts-noconfidence-vote/news-story/29937180b2e82dd114b9395ae164f781
https://www.facebook.com/opmcpress/posts/1006944878173593
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73476
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23002826 (070923ZMAY25) Notable: Larissa Waters chosen as new Greens leader - Larissa Waters has been chosen as the new federal Greens leader, replacing Adam Bandt. The Greens held a party room meeting in Melbourne today to select a leader following the shock loss of Adam Bandt. The race was between Mehreen Faruqi, Sarah Hanson-Young and Senator Waters. A Greens source told the ABC the role was decided by "consensus". Senator Faruqi, who is from New South Wales, was chosen as deputy and Senator Hanson-Young, from South Australia, was chosen as manager of business in the Senate. "I feel so strengthened by the sentiment of the room and by this amazing team," Senator Waters told reporters after the meeting. "We've got a lot of work to do because people are really hurting and the planet is hurting, and we need a parliament that actually delivers for people and has the courage and the boldness and the heart to deliver some help to people." A disappointing election campaign saw the minor party lose three of its four seats in the lower house after a modest drop in its national share of the first preference vote. But the party will again exert significant influence in the Senate, where it has retained its 11 seats and is likely to be in the balance of power, meaning Labor could pass legislation with its support alone.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73455
>>73474
Greens leader Adam Bandt set to lose seat of Melbourne
David Crowe and Olivia Ireland - May 7, 2025
1/2
Greens leader Adam Bandt is set to lose the seat of Melbourne in a shock defeat that leaves the party in disarray after a series of extraordinary setbacks at the election.
Labor claimed victory for its candidate, charity chief Sarah Witty, in the tight contest on Wednesday after gaining more than 53 per cent of the vote so far, but Bandt has not conceded.
The Australian Electoral Commission extended its booth-by-booth, two-party preferred count of the seat showing substantial swings to Witty, who was leading against Bandt by more than 2000 votes late on Wednesday afternoon.
In the key booth of Richmond, which Labor won 51-49 at the 2022 election, Witty won 61-38. In the nearby Cremorne booth, Witty enjoyed a 15 per cent swing while in Fitzroy - a Greens’ stronghold - she was boosted by a near 9 per cent swing.
ABC election analyst Anthony Green said on Wednesday afternoon that based on current voting trends, Bandt would lose the seat.
Greens observers said there were as many as 15,000 absentee and declaration votes still to be counted, which meant they were not conceding the seat. Among those outstanding votes are 4000 postal ballots, which Witty is winning 64-36.
A key factor in the voting so far was the way Labor gained ground across the board in terms of core support, increasing its primary vote in Melbourne by almost 6 per cent and taking second place to Bandt with these votes.
The stronger primary vote put Labor in a winning position on Wednesday afternoon because it gained support from voters who had selected Witty ahead of Bandt with their second and later preferences, highlighting the stronger support for Labor over alternatives, including the Liberals.
One Labor observer said most of the voters who chose the Liberals with their primary votes gave their preferences to Witty rather than Bandt, saying this reflected on the Greens’ policies and campaign.
Another Labor source said Bandt was receiving only 24 per cent of the preferences, but needed 33 per cent to win.
“He just needed more preferences to flow back to him,” he said.
A Greens spokesperson said the count had to proceed.
“While there are many, many thousands of votes to be counted, we are not conceding Melbourne,” the spokesperson said.
Witty is a housing advocate and chief executive of the Nappy Collective, which provides free nappies to families in crisis.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73477
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23002836 (070933ZMAY25) Notable: History-making Wilson wins in Goldstein, Hamer hopes in Kooyong - Tim Wilson has won Goldstein in a dramatic comeback after building an unassailable lead over teal incumbent MP Zoe Daniel through a postal vote surge. After trailing Daniel by 1800 votes on election night, the Liberal candidate was ahead of the incumbent teal independent MP by 725 votes on Tuesday evening following the latest count update in Goldstein. Wilson’s victory has wider significance for the Liberal Party as it reels in the wake of Saturday’s disastrous election loss to Labor. Wilson was a prominent and energetic member of the Morrison government who led the attack on Labor’s then franking credits policy, and has previously campaigned strongly on free speech. He is also a rare moderate urban Liberal in a party room in the throes of selecting a replacement for Peter Dutton as leader. In another teal versus Liberal contest, Kooyong challenger Amelia Hamer is riding a postal vote surge that is eating away at the lead of incumbent independent Monique Ryan. Ryan leads Hamer 50.5 per cent to 49.5 per cent on a two-candidate-preferred basis. That equates to about 1002 votes based on figures published by the Australian Electoral Commission at 4.30pm on Tuesday. That margin has decreased from about 1400 votes on Monday night with 10,009 votes in the pile yet to be counted, 8564 of which are postal votes.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73455
>>73473
History-making Wilson wins in Goldstein, Hamer hopes in Kooyong
Cara Waters and Rachael Dexter - May 6, 2025
1/2
Tim Wilson has won Goldstein in a dramatic comeback after building an unassailable lead over teal incumbent MP Zoe Daniel through a postal vote surge.
After trailing Daniel by 1800 votes on election night, the Liberal candidate was ahead of the incumbent teal independent MP by 725 votes on Tuesday evening following the latest count update in Goldstein.
Wilson’s victory has wider significance for the Liberal Party as it reels in the wake of Saturday’s disastrous election loss to Labor.
Wilson was a prominent and energetic member of the Morrison government who led the attack on Labor’s then franking credits policy, and has previously campaigned strongly on free speech.
He is also a rare moderate urban Liberal in a party room in the throes of selecting a replacement for Peter Dutton as leader.
In another teal versus Liberal contest, Kooyong challenger Amelia Hamer is riding a postal vote surge that is eating away at the lead of incumbent independent Monique Ryan.
Ryan leads Hamer 50.5 per cent to 49.5 per cent on a two-candidate-preferred basis. That equates to about 1002 votes based on figures published by the Australian Electoral Commission at 4.30pm on Tuesday.
That margin has decreased from about 1400 votes on Monday night with 10,009 votes in the pile yet to be counted, 8564 of which are postal votes.
It’s a dramatic change in fortune in both seats with Daniel claiming victory in Goldstein at her election party on Saturday night when she was firmly ahead in the polls. Her lead eroded steadily as postal votes were counted and Wilson took the lead on Tuesday.
There were 24,299 postal votes issued in Goldstein and of these 13,982 ballot papers had been counted just after 5pm on Tuesday.
There are still 5986 votes received but not yet counted with postal votes strongly favouring Wilson.
Daniel has not conceded the seat. Both Wilson and Daniel declined interview requests on Tuesday night.
“Out of respect for my scrutineers and the democratic process, I will await further counting,” Daniel said.
“With the margin in the hundreds and the remaining votes in the thousands, this seems sensible. Again, I thank all of those who supported me in so many ways during my campaign and with their vote.”
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73478
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23002844 (070941ZMAY25) Notable: Liberals revolt over policy failures as Sussan Ley is ‘pragmatic’ frontrunner for leader - A raft of Liberal policies across environment, health, defence, tax and education were either not released or held back so long that they “barely saw the light of day”, insiders have revealed, as Sussan Ley emerges as the “pragmatic” frontrunner over Angus Taylor in the race to be the next leader. Coalition insiders said policies worked on for years that would have laid out how the opposition would “halve” approval times for environmental projects and address the defence force’s personnel crisis were spiked by Peter Dutton’s office and Liberal HQ, while proposals in portfolios such as education were held up for months until it was almost too late to spruik them to voters. “People in the policy unit or whatever you want to call it thought they knew better than everyone else,” one senior Liberal source said. The Australian understands defence spokesman Andrew Hastie was effectively shut out of policy development in his portfolio by Mr Dutton, a former defence minister, who Liberal sources claim leaned instead on an Institute of Public Affairs policy blueprint funded by Gina Rinehart - a longtime detractor of Mr Hastie. “Most decisions came from four or five people, Peter (Dutton), Angus (Taylor) and a few in the Senate, like (James) Paterson,” one Liberal MP said. Tasmanian senator Jonathon Duniam on Tuesday became the latest Liberal to blast the handling of the election by the Coalition’s campaign headquarters. “Many of us on the ground right across the country, (including) me here in Tasmania, saw some pretty alarming signs, which we fed in but were ignored,” Senator Duniam told Sky News.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73455
>>73470
Liberals revolt over policy failures as Sussan Ley is ‘pragmatic’ frontrunner for leader
SARAH ISON and JACK QUAIL - 6 May 2025
A raft of Liberal policies across environment, health, defence, tax and education were either not released or held back so long that they “barely saw the light of day”, insiders have revealed, as Sussan Ley emerges as the “pragmatic” frontrunner over Angus Taylor in the race to be the next leader.
Coalition insiders said policies worked on for years that would have laid out how the opposition would “halve” approval times for environmental projects and address the defence force’s personnel crisis were spiked by Peter Dutton’s office and Liberal HQ, while proposals in portfolios such as education were held up for months until it was almost too late to spruik them to voters.
“People in the policy unit or whatever you want to call it thought they knew better than everyone else,” one senior Liberal source said.
The Australian understands defence spokesman Andrew Hastie was effectively shut out of policy development in his portfolio by Mr Dutton, a former defence minister, who Liberal sources claim leaned instead on an Institute of Public Affairs policy blueprint funded by Gina Rinehart – a longtime detractor of Mr Hastie.
“Most decisions came from four or five people, Peter (Dutton), Angus (Taylor) and a few in the Senate, like (James) Paterson,” one Liberal MP said.
Tasmanian senator Jonathon Duniam on Tuesday became the latest Liberal to blast the handling of the election by the Coalition’s campaign headquarters.
“Many of us on the ground right across the country, (including) me here in Tasmania, saw some pretty alarming signs, which we fed in but were ignored,” Senator Duniam told Sky News.
Nationals Senate leader Bridget McKenzie said there were a range of issues that led to the “catastrophic loss”, including problems “around the campaign, research, communication, policy … tactics and strategy”.
Recriminations over the Coalition’s crushing loss come amid a growing battle for the Liberal leadership, with Ms Ley emerging as the key contender over Mr Taylor as several conservative MPs shifted support to her.
Mr Taylor’s detractors have unleashed an avalanche of criticism against the opposition Treasury spokesman in recent days, blaming him for the Coalition’s lacklustre economic agenda and perceived failure to take advantage of Labor’s management of the cost of living. On Tuesday, the criticism continued, with several Liberal MPs remarking Mr Taylor had a “very close” relationship to Mr Dutton, in an effort to link him to the deeply unpopular former Liberal leader.
“If Angus Taylor is the answer, I’m not sure what the question is,” one senior Liberal said. “If you can’t make a dent after 12 interest rate hikes and oppose (Labor’s’) tax cuts you should be disqualified from the Liberal leadership.”
Another Liberal source said: “Any Liberal treasurer that doesn’t support tax cuts is electoral poison”.
Outgoing Liberal senator Hollie Hughes said she had “concerns” about Mr Taylor’s capability, raising questions over what he had done for three years.
Backers of Ms Ley describe her as a pragmatic moderate willing to take on Labor when needed, arguing that her appointment as the Liberal Party’s first female leader could help win back disillusioned female voters and provide a harder target for Anthony Albanese, who often stresses the need to be more respectful of women.
Likely aiding Ms Ley’s leadership bid is Liberal moderate Tim Wilson’s expected victory in Goldstein. Liberal candidates in the former blue-ribbon seats of Kooyong and Bradfield, Amelia Hamer and Gisele Kapterian, are also expected to lend support to Ms Ley’s candidacy if they win.
While Liberal insiders said Ms Ley would have the numbers based on moderates and undecided members, several conservatives revealed they also believed she would be the best choice.
Dan Tehan’s name has also been floated, but many MPs said they didn’t believe he would get the leadership and needed to focus on holding Wannon, which he came so close to losing.
“The fact is, Angus (Taylor) would survive seven seconds, Dan Tehan one minute and Sussan Ley a few hours,” one Coalition MP said. “I don’t really think any of them are up for it, but Sussan is more than the others.”
Mr Taylor’s supporters have sought to distance him from Mr Dutton, pointing to his push to develop an income tax policy designed to eliminate bracket creep.
https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/liberals-revolt-over-policy-failures-as-sussan-ley-is-pragmatic-frontrunner-for-leader/news-story/dc1a803c336c790c8ea8c7b702b06713
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73479
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23002853 (070947ZMAY25) Notable: Analysis: Beware the landslide - Ardern’s lesson for victorious Albanese - "Watching Australia’s 2025 federal election from Wellington gave me an uncanny sense of deja vu. As Labor swept to power with a commanding parliamentary majority and the Coalition suffered its worst defeat in generations, I could not help but think: “I have seen this movie before.” New Zealand’s Labour Party swept to power in 2020 with the first single-party majority under our proportional representation system. Jacinda Ardern secured 50 per cent of the vote while National collapsed to 26 per cent - their worst result in decades. Three years later, Labour was unceremoniously ejected. How could fortunes reverse so dramatically? And what might this mean for Anthony Albanese’s triumphant Labor Party? The Australian results mirror New Zealand’s 2020 election. Labor now commands nearly 90 seats in the 151-seat House of Representatives. The Coalition lies shattered, with Peter Dutton losing his seat. In Melbourne, Adelaide and Brisbane, Liberal representation has virtually disappeared, a blood-bath of historic proportions. After such a victory, Labor’s strategists must feel the intoxicating pull of ambition. Why not seize this moment to fundamentally reshape Australia? New Zealand’s experience offers a sobering answer. Ardern’s government, drunk on its parliamentary majority, embarked on an ambitious agenda of structural reforms that nobody had actually voted for. Consider their “Three Waters” program - a classic case of centralist overreach. Councils would be forced to relinquish control of water assets to new mega-entities with complex co-governance arrangements with Maori. In reality, it exemplified bureaucratic empire-building and sparked nationwide backlash. No matter how overwhelming the majority, governments ultimately face the most effective constraint: the judgment of ordinary citizens, concerned more with results than rhetoric, willing to discard yesterday’s political heroes when the results do not match the promises. That is both the frustration and glory of democracy - a lesson New Zealand’s Labour learned the hard way. Australia’s Labor Party might believe they are different. They are not." - Oliver Hartwich, executive director of The New Zealand Initiative - theaustralian.com.au
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73455
Beware the landslide: Ardern’s lesson for victorious Albanese
OLIVER HARTWICH - 6 May 2025
1/2
Watching Australia’s 2025 federal election from Wellington gave me an uncanny sense of deja vu. As Labor swept to power with a commanding parliamentary majority and the Coalition suffered its worst defeat in generations, I could not help but think: “I have seen this movie before.”
New Zealand’s Labour Party swept to power in 2020 with the first single-party majority under our proportional representation system. Jacinda Ardern secured 50 per cent of the vote while National collapsed to 26 per cent – their worst result in decades.
Three years later, Labour was unceremoniously ejected.
How could fortunes reverse so dramatically? And what might this mean for Anthony Albanese’s triumphant Labor Party?
The Australian results mirror New Zealand’s 2020 election. Labor now commands nearly 90 seats in the 151-seat House of Representatives. The Coalition lies shattered, with Peter Dutton losing his seat. In Melbourne, Adelaide and Brisbane, Liberal representation has virtually disappeared, a blood-bath of historic proportions.
After such a victory, Labor’s strategists must feel the intoxicating pull of ambition. Why not seize this moment to fundamentally reshape Australia?
New Zealand’s experience offers a sobering answer.
Ardern’s government, drunk on its parliamentary majority, embarked on an ambitious agenda of structural reforms that nobody had actually voted for.
Consider their “Three Waters” program – a classic case of centralist overreach. Councils would be forced to relinquish control of water assets to new mega-entities with complex co-governance arrangements with Maori.
In reality, it exemplified bureaucratic empire-building and sparked nationwide backlash.
Or take Labour’s overhaul of the Resource Management Act – replacing New Zealand’s primary planning legislation. The ambition was breathtaking: simultaneously addressing housing, environment, infrastructure and climate change. By election time, this supposedly transformational reform had made a poorly performing regulatory system worse.
Meanwhile, Labour created a new centralised health bureaucracy that consumed billions while hospital waiting lists grew ever longer and health outcomes deteriorated.
What do these initiatives share? They were ideologically motivated, bureaucratically complex, and failed to address everyday concerns of voters. While Labour restructured everything that moved, New Zealanders worried about immediate concerns. Inflation surged to 7.3 per cent. Mortgage rates doubled. Grocery prices soared.
How did Labour respond? Initially with denial. Then with token gestures – a temporary petrol tax cut here, a cost-of-living payment there. But these were all sticking plasters. By the time Chris Hipkins replaced Ardern in early 2023, promising to focus on “bread and butter” issues (and resulting in a bounce upwards for Labour in the opinion polls), the damage was done.
Does this sound familiar to Australian observers? It should.
Albanese’s government shows worrying signs of similar tendencies: grand ambitions for housing, sweeping climate targets, industrial relations reforms, and Indigenous recognition. No matter their individual justifications, taken together, these would be a recipe for overreach.
The fundamental lesson: landslide victories create a dangerous illusion. They suggest broad endorsement of a party’s entire agenda when they often simply reflect rejection of an unpalatable alternative. New Zealanders did not vote for Labour in 2020 because they wanted water infrastructure to get an extra dose of centralisation. They voted Labour because Ardern had created her own brand during the early phases of the pandemic, while National appeared divided.
Similarly, Australians did not vote Labor because they crave expansive government programs. They voted Labor because the Coalition had not offered much of substance.
Here lies the trap: mistaking rejection of your opponents for endorsement of your most ambitious plans.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73480
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23007391 (080912ZMAY25) Notable: Ley gets backing from party elders as Liberal leadership battle grows hostile - Liberal deputy leader Sussan Ley has won support from three former Liberal premiers in the quest to lead the party out of its sweeping defeat, with Jeff Kennett, Nick Greiner and Barry O’Farrell naming her as the best choice. The former premiers went public with their support as another senior Liberal, former party president Shane Stone, also named Ley as the best leader to win back voters who deserted the party at the ballot box. Others are throwing their support behind the shadow treasurer, Angus Taylor, in a contest that threatens ongoing stability by pitting conservatives against moderates in an increasingly hostile leadership battle, with files circulated highlighting rival weaknesses. Kennett, who was premier of Victoria from 1992 to 1999, said the Liberals had a chance to rebuild within three years if they learnt the lessons from what he called the “amateurish” campaign to the federal election. “I am not one of those who believe that the future for the party is lost or necessarily will take two elections before we are again a viable alternative,” he said. “I would very much endorse Sussan Ley coming in as the leader. Why do I say that? One, I like the fact that as deputy, she was a loyal deputy. Secondly, she has a great deal of parliamentary experience. She’s a very rounded person. My experience over life is that women are more consultative, they listen more, they think more than a lot of men. I’m not suggesting she should be the next leader because she’s female - I’m saying it’s because I think she’s the best person for the job.”
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73455
>>73470
>>73478
Ley gets backing from party elders as Liberal leadership battle grows hostile
David Crowe and Paul Sakkal - May 8, 2025
1/2
Liberal deputy leader Sussan Ley has won support from three former Liberal premiers in the quest to lead the party out of its sweeping defeat, with Jeff Kennett, Nick Greiner and Barry O’Farrell naming her as the best choice.
The former premiers went public with their support as another senior Liberal, former party president Shane Stone, also named Ley as the best leader to win back voters who deserted the party at the ballot box.
Others are throwing their support behind the shadow treasurer, Angus Taylor, in a contest that threatens ongoing stability by pitting conservatives against moderates in an increasingly hostile leadership battle, with files circulated highlighting rival weaknesses.
Kennett, who was premier of Victoria from 1992 to 1999, said the Liberals had a chance to rebuild within three years if they learnt the lessons from what he called the “amateurish” campaign to the federal election.
“I am not one of those who believe that the future for the party is lost or necessarily will take two elections before we are again a viable alternative,” he said. “I would very much endorse Sussan Ley coming in as the leader.
“Why do I say that? One, I like the fact that as deputy, she was a loyal deputy. Secondly, she has a great deal of parliamentary experience. She’s a very rounded person.
“My experience over life is that women are more consultative, they listen more, they think more than a lot of men.
“I’m not suggesting she should be the next leader because she’s female – I’m saying it’s because I think she’s the best person for the job.”
Greiner, who was premier of NSW from 1988 to 1992 and federal president of the Liberal Party from 2017 to 2020, said the key question for the party was whether it wanted to change in response to the verdict on Saturday.
Greiner said the party should set a course to be “warm and dry” on policy – that is, liberal on social issues and conservative on economic issues – and needed a leader who could enact change.
“I do think that Sussan is the change candidate,” he said. “I think that in the future the party needs to be liberal, sticking to its values, and it needs to be sensible, and it needs to be in the centre.
“The notion that you can get anywhere by not being sensible and centric is, I think, pretty bizarre.”
O’Farrell, who was premier of NSW from 2011 to 2014, said the two main parties tended to move to their opposite extremes in times of defeat but had to learn from this mistake.
“When they lose, Labor goes left. When we lose, we go right,” he said. “And guess what – we only ever win when we’re back in the centre. It’s a really easy thing to plot over the years.”
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73481
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23007424 (080939ZMAY25) Notable: Jacinta Price defects to Liberals to run as Taylor’s deputy in leadership bid - Senator Jacinta Nampijinpa Price will run as shadow treasurer Angus Taylor’s deputy in the battle for the Liberal Party leadership against Sussan Ley, after her shock defection from the National Party on Thursday afternoon. The move has effectively blown apart the Coalition, angering Liberal moderates hoping current deputy leader Sussan Ley would replace Peter Dutton as opposition leader and devastating the National Party. Price only phoned Littleproud as she released a statement announcing her move, according to two sources familiar with Price who were unauthorised to speak publicly. The late call was designed to head off any attempt by Littleproud to thwart the switch. As a member of the Country Liberal Party, the Northern Territory’s merged division of the Coalition, she can sit in either the National or Liberal party rooms in Canberra, but it is unclear if the CLP itself gets to decide where Price sits. The move gives Price a vote in the tight contest between Taylor and Ley, which one Liberal MP supporting Ley described as a “desperate branch stack” and a “hostile takeover by the National Party”. Sources close to Taylor, unable to speak publicly, said Price may run as Taylor’s deputy when the party room meets on Tuesday to elect a new leader. The shadow treasurer’s camp believes her star power in the party room and with the base will make Taylor’s ticket hard to resist. Former prime minister Tony Abbott played a key role convincing Price to move. The senator, who is hugely popular among conservatives, had been interested in joining the Liberal Party last term. She has also been courted by Liberals to run for a lower house seat, but that is not on the cards immediately.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73455
>>73470
>>73478
Jacinta Price defects to Liberals to run as Taylor’s deputy in leadership bid
Paul Sakkal - May 8, 2025
1/2
Senator Jacinta Nampijinpa Price will run as shadow treasurer Angus Taylor’s deputy in the battle for the Liberal Party leadership against Sussan Ley, after her shock defection from the National Party on Thursday afternoon.
The move has effectively blown apart the Coalition, angering Liberal moderates hoping current deputy leader Sussan Ley would replace Peter Dutton as opposition leader and devastating the National Party.
Price only phoned Littleproud as she released a statement announcing her move, according to two sources familiar with Price who were unauthorised to speak publicly. The late call was designed to head off any attempt by Littleproud to thwart the switch.
As a member of the Country Liberal Party, the Northern Territory’s merged division of the Coalition, she can sit in either the National or Liberal party rooms in Canberra, but it is unclear if the CLP itself gets to decide where Price sits.
The move gives Price a vote in the tight contest between Taylor and Ley, which one Liberal MP supporting Ley described as a “desperate branch stack” and a “hostile takeover by the National Party”.
Sources close to Taylor, unable to speak publicly, said Price may run as Taylor’s deputy when the party room meets on Tuesday to elect a new leader. The shadow treasurer’s camp believes her star power in the party room and with the base will make Taylor’s ticket hard to resist.
Former prime minister Tony Abbott played a key role convincing Price to move. The senator, who is hugely popular among conservatives, had been interested in joining the Liberal Party last term. She has also been courted by Liberals to run for a lower house seat, but that is not on the cards immediately.
In Price’s statement, she said she had not made the decision lightly but wanted to help rebuild the Liberal Party after its worst loss in its history.
“I am deeply appreciative of the opportunities the National Party under David Littleproud’s leadership has given me, most notably the responsibility of leading the No campaign in the Voice referendum,” she said in a statement.
“I am eager to fight for the best interests of all Australians as part of the Coalition. I do however feel the Liberal Party is my natural home.”
Signalling that she would not back away from culture wars, she said: “Let this be the moment we stop whispering our values and start declaring them again, not as fringe ideas, but as the foundation on which this country was built.”
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73482
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23007443 (080949ZMAY25) Notable: Ed Husic, Mark Dreyfus axed in factional power play as Albanese prepares new ministry - Labor faction leaders have cut down two cabinet ministers in a brutal display of caucus power, forcing out Industry Minister Ed Husic and Attorney-General Mark Dreyfus and sparking anger from MPs at the “chaos and disunity” days after the federal election. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has accepted the outcome despite promising stability at the election, but caucus members were dismayed at the way the faction leaders forced the issue, with the Right faction deciding it would not support two of its most senior members. Deputy Prime Minister Richard Marles, the most senior member of the Right, led a push from Victorian colleagues to gain more sway at the top of the government and promote younger members aligned with his faction. The moves triggered anger from NSW Right MPs at Marles and his loyalists over the shock changes, which they said compromised the unity and stability of the government in the first days of its second term. “How do we explain this to the public? It looks like chaos and disunity to knife two ministers whose performance has never been in question,” one NSW MP said. The fiery meeting of the national Right was repeatedly delayed on Thursday afternoon as deals were hashed out, and several MPs spoke out against the plan to remove Dreyfus and Husic. Another member of the Right, western Sydney MP Mike Freelander, said the outcome “beggars belief” because of the quality of the two ministers, praising Dreyfus in particular. “It’s disgraceful, it’s stupid and it’s wrong,” he told this masthead. “It’s an ill wind that blows through this place - two highly-performing ministers being replaced by union hacks.”
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73455
Ed Husic, Mark Dreyfus axed in factional power play as Albanese prepares new ministry
Paul Sakkal and David Crowe - May 8, 2025
1/2
Labor faction leaders have cut down two cabinet ministers in a brutal display of caucus power, forcing out Industry Minister Ed Husic and Attorney-General Mark Dreyfus and sparking anger from MPs at the “chaos and disunity” days after the federal election.
Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has accepted the outcome despite promising stability at the election, but caucus members were dismayed at the way the faction leaders forced the issue, with the Right faction deciding it would not support two of its most senior members.
Deputy Prime Minister Richard Marles, the most senior member of the Right, led a push from Victorian colleagues to gain more sway at the top of the government and promote younger members aligned with his faction.
The moves triggered anger from NSW Right MPs at Marles and his loyalists over the shock changes, which they said compromised the unity and stability of the government in the first days of its second term.
“How do we explain this to the public? It looks like chaos and disunity to knife two ministers whose performance has never been in question,” one NSW MP said.
The fiery meeting of the national Right was repeatedly delayed on Thursday afternoon as deals were hashed out, and several MPs spoke out against the plan to remove Dreyfus and Husic.
Another member of the Right, western Sydney MP Mike Freelander, said the outcome “beggars belief” because of the quality of the two ministers, praising Dreyfus in particular.
“It’s disgraceful, it’s stupid and it’s wrong,” he told this masthead.
“It’s an ill wind that blows through this place – two highly-performing ministers being replaced by union hacks.”
Dreyfus delivered on a key election pledge on integrity in the last term of parliament by setting up the National Anti-Corruption Commission, while Husic set up the $15 billion National Reconstruction Fund to invest in local industry.
The changes are expected to help two Victorian MPs, Sam Rae and Daniel Mulino, gain executive positions. A third member of the faction, Victorian senator Raff Ciccone, was also being named as a potential addition to a role.
Labor’s internal power groupings have been in intense talks since the election to carve up the 30 cabinet positions in line with party rules that give factions ministries in line with their numbers in parliament, with the Left’s success on Saturday entitling it to an extra spot.
This meant that Marles’ group and the Victorian shop workers’ union are underrepresented in cabinet while former leader Bill Shorten’s old Australian Workers’ Union sub-faction, which includes Dreyfus and Housing Minister Clare O’Neil, has too many ministers.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73483
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23007460 (081006ZMAY25) Notable: Larissa Waters chosen as new Greens leader - Larissa Waters has been chosen as the new federal Greens leader, replacing Adam Bandt. The Greens held a party room meeting in Melbourne today to select a leader following the shock loss of Adam Bandt. The race was between Mehreen Faruqi, Sarah Hanson-Young and Senator Waters. A Greens source told the ABC the role was decided by "consensus". Senator Faruqi, who is from New South Wales, was chosen as deputy and Senator Hanson-Young, from South Australia, was chosen as manager of business in the Senate. "I feel so strengthened by the sentiment of the room and by this amazing team," Senator Waters told reporters after the meeting. "We've got a lot of work to do because people are really hurting and the planet is hurting, and we need a parliament that actually delivers for people and has the courage and the boldness and the heart to deliver some help to people." A disappointing election campaign saw the minor party lose three of its four seats in the lower house after a modest drop in its national share of the first preference vote. But the party will again exert significant influence in the Senate, where it has retained its 11 seats and is likely to be in the balance of power, meaning Labor could pass legislation with its support alone.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73455
>>73474
>>73476
Defeated Adam Bandt likens climate change to ‘invasion’ as Peter Dutton cites voter ‘disgust’ at Greens
ALEXI DEMETRIADI - 8 May 2025
1/2
Former Greens leader Christine Milne has warned her devastated party it needs to focus on core green issues if it is to be effective in the new parliament, as a vanquished Adam Bandt called on the left to treat climate change like an “invasion”.
Mr Bandt’s concession of defeat in the seat of Melbourne leaves his deputy, Mehreen Faruqi, and senators Larissa Waters and Sarah Hanson-Young jostling ahead of a leadership vote to lead a party left with only one lower-house member.
Mr Bandt lashed the major parties on Thursday, calling for climate change to be treated like a “war” and blamed “One Nation and Liberal preferences” for his defeat as Labor’s campaign machine celebrated its second party leader scalp.
Also on Thursday, Peter Dutton cited rejection of anti-Semitism as a reason for Mr Bandt losing the seat of Melbourne to Labor’s Sarah Witty, who is a foster carer and is chief executive of the Nappy Collective, a charity providing nappies to needy families.
“No spin by Adam Bandt can change the reality that he, and other Green members, lost their seats because of their appalling treatment of the Jewish community,” the former Liberal opposition leader tweeted on Thursday afternoon.
“Australians were rightly disgusted at their behaviour.
“We were proud to preference the Greens last, helping to ensure Adam Bandt’s loss.”
During Mr Bandt’s concession speech on Thursday, he blamed Mr Dutton as a reason why the Greens have lost seats, saying many Australians had voted Labor as the “best option to stop Dutton’’.
“People in Melbourne hate Peter Dutton with a very good reason,” Mr Bandt said.
“They have seen his brand of toxic racism on display for many years, seen his time as immigration minister, seen him make comments about Melbourne and like many, many of them wanted him as far away from power as possible.”
Mr Bandt clarified that while Mr Dutton was not the sole reason for the shift away from the Greens in seats, he still made an impact on vote numbers.
Ms Milne’s intervention comes after fellow former Greens leader Bob Brown blamed the media and major parties for “vilifying” Mr Bandt, accusing Anthony Albanese of having the “grace of a cockroach” over his reaction to the Greens’ seat losses.
Mr Brown also raised whether the left-wing party should start running open tickets to deny Labor the preferences that have got it over the line in some electorates.
The party’s parliamentary members will elect new leadership in a party-room meeting next week, with Senator Faruqi a likely frontrunner, but amid support for senators Waters, Jordon Steele-John, and Hanson-Young.
Ms Milne, a pioneering Greens politician who led the party federally from 2012 to 2015, said Mr Bandt’s loss was “devastating” and party’s lower house near wipe-out “disappointing”.
However, she said the party retained a high Senate vote, and that Greens senators should use their balance of power “to secure significant climate and environment policy”.
“But to get it, they will have to focus on the planetary crisis playing out right around the country: the logging, the landclearing, the new fossil fuel projects,” she said.
The party should focus on “the failure of the Labor Party to address … in any meaningful way or to deliver the comprehensive new environment laws that were promised”.
Some may interpret her comments as seeking to return the party to his environmental roots, after an election marked in part by Mr Bandt’s focus on the Israel-Hamas conflict.
However, Ms Milne said she backed the party’s stance and did not believe it was anti-Semitic.
“The Greens have always stood up for human rights and international law from the Tampa, to the Iraq war and Gaza,” she said.
“We have never and will never tolerate genocide or anti-Semitism. It is appalling to me that so many are turning a blind eye. I am proud the Greens have taken the stand they have.”
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73484
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23007467 (081013ZMAY25) Notable: OPINION: A pragmatic China policy can provide Australia the certainty it seeks - "Recently, discussions within Australia have intensified regarding the trajectory of China-Australia relations, as various voices attempted to offer "road maps" for the direction the Anthony Albanese administration should take. Last week, the Australian Labor Party secured a decisive victory in the federal election, with Albanese becoming the first Australian leader in 21 years to be re-elected. Consequently, the state of China-Australia relations under Albanese 2.0 has become a focal point of public discourse. For instance, a Lowy Institute article on Wednesday suggested that Canberra should "speak up" about Beijing's "human rights issues." Similarly, the infamous Australian Strategic Policy Institute continues its anti-China agenda by labeling China "the most active state engaged in hybrid threats targeting Australia." These perspectives underscore a segment of Australian discourse that views China through a confrontational lens and aims to increase suspicion and hostility toward the country. At a time when the global economy is slowing and geopolitical tensions are rising, China and Australia - both major players in the Asia-Pacific - should continue to choose the path of dialogue and cooperation. A sustained pragmatic and rational approach to China under Albanese 2.0 will help take the bilateral relationship to a new level of mutually beneficial cooperation, which would not only serve both countries' interests but also support stability and development in the region. Experience in recent years has shown that blindly following Washington's lead and treating China as a strategic adversary has harmed Australia's diplomatic independence and dealt real blows to its economy. Learning from those lessons and continuing to pursue a pragmatic and balanced China policy is the right strategic path for Australia." - Global Times - globaltimes.cn
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73455
>>73464
>>73475
OPINION: A pragmatic China policy can provide Australia the certainty it seeks
Global Times - May 07, 2025
Recently, discussions within Australia have intensified regarding the trajectory of China-Australia relations, as various voices attempted to offer "road maps" for the direction the Anthony Albanese administration should take. Last week, the Australian Labor Party secured a decisive victory in the federal election, with Albanese becoming the first Australian leader in 21 years to be re-elected. Consequently, the state of China-Australia relations under Albanese 2.0 has become a focal point of public discourse.
For instance, a Lowy Institute article on Wednesday suggested that Canberra should "speak up" about Beijing's "human rights issues." Similarly, the infamous Australian Strategic Policy Institute continues its anti-China agenda by labeling China "the most active state engaged in hybrid threats targeting Australia." These perspectives underscore a segment of Australian discourse that views China through a confrontational lens and aims to increase suspicion and hostility toward the country.
Chen Hong, a professor and director of the Australian Studies Centre at East China Normal University, told the Global Times that these narratives are clearly aimed at complicating the bilateral relationship. It is essential for the Australian government to remain vigilant against such attempts to sow discord.
Under the Albanese administration, the strained China-Australia relationship has been repaired to a certain extent. Albanese repeatedly emphasized that China is an important trading partner for Australia and highlighted the significance of developing bilateral relations. His administration adopted a strategy that contributed to stabilizing ties, resulting in the resumption of high-level dialogues and a gradual easing of trade tensions between the two countries.
Chen added that he is positive that Albanese 2.0 will witness the China-Australia relationship maintaining its current stability. Canberra will likely work hard to promote Australia's interests. "Especially in a world filled with growing uncertainty, Australia wants to create more certainty by itself, rather than sitting back and waiting for external uncertainty to wreak havoc on Australia's policy, or even change it," he said.
Today, China-Australia relations remain in a gradual process of rebuilding and restoring trust. This progress should not be taken for granted. Of course, there are differences between China and Australia, but the key lies in how those differences are managed. Those divergences should not overshadow the cooperative aspects of the bilateral ties. There is still significant potential for cooperation between the two countries. Their economies are highly complementary, and there are major opportunities for collaboration in emerging fields, such as renewable energy, the digital economy and artificial intelligence. In addition, ties in education, tourism and cultural exchange continue to grow stronger.
At a time when the global economy is slowing and geopolitical tensions are rising, China and Australia - both major players in the Asia-Pacific - should continue to choose the path of dialogue and cooperation. A sustained pragmatic and rational approach to China under Albanese 2.0 will help take the bilateral relationship to a new level of mutually beneficial cooperation, which would not only serve both countries' interests but also support stability and development in the region. Experience in recent years has shown that blindly following Washington's lead and treating China as a strategic adversary has harmed Australia's diplomatic independence and dealt real blows to its economy. Learning from those lessons and continuing to pursue a pragmatic and balanced China policy is the right strategic path for Australia.
https://www.globaltimes.cn/page/202505/1333542.shtml
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73485
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23012385 (091238ZMAY25) Notable: Video: American Robert Francis Prevost elected Pope Leo XIV - The new leader of the Catholic Church is the American cardinal Robert Prevost, who has taken the papal name Leo XIV. Pope Leo XIV, the first American pope, emerged on the balcony overlooking St Peter’s Square early this morning Australian time to huge cheers and prolonging applause from the tens of thousands of people who stampeded into the area once the bells tolled and white smoke billowed from the Sistine Chapel on day two of voting. Amid wild excitement and cheers of “Abbiamo Papa, ole, ole, ole” Leo XIV emerged about an hour later quietly raising his hands and waving with both arms. He appeared to choke up when the crowd responded with chants of ‘Viva il Papa’. The new pope is a 69-year-old dual citizen, originally from Chicago, who took Peruvian citizenship after serving in that country for several decades. Most recently he has been the head of the church’s Dicastery for Bishops overseeing the selection of new bishops. Pope Leo XIV is not without controversy however. He was previously criticised for not doing enough within the church to deal with historic sexual assault allegations, although he had referred the complaints to the police. Leo XIV is considered a compromise candidate, and a centrist embracing a pastoral role not unlike Francis. However he opposes ordaining women as deacons and on other issues of church doctrine is somewhat conservative. Tim Costelloe, the Archbishop of Perth, was among the first to congratulate the new pope. “Cardinal Prevost brought to his most recent role as Prefect of the Dicastery for Bishops an approachability and willingness to listen which were no doubt developed throughout his many years as an Augustinian missionary in Peru. He will be warmly welcomed by the Church in Latin America, as Pope Francis was, by the Church in the United States from where he comes, from the English-speaking world as a native English speaker, and from the whole Church as a man of God steeped in the rich spirituality of his Augustinian Religious Order. As Pope Leo XIV, our new pope will bring the benefit of his wide experience to the many challenges and opportunities before him.”
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
American Robert Francis Prevost elected Pope Leo XIV
JACQUELIN MAGNAY - 9 May 2025
The new leader of the Catholic Church is the American cardinal Robert Prevost, who has taken the papal name Leo XIV.
Pope Leo XIV, the first American pope, emerged on the balcony overlooking St Peter’s Square early this morning Australian time to huge cheers and prolonging applause from the tens of thousands of people who stampeded into the area once the bells tolled and white smoke billowed from the Sistine Chapel on day two of voting.
Amid wild excitement and cheers of “Abbiamo Papa, ole, ole, ole” Leo XIV emerged about an hour later quietly raising his hands and waving with both arms. He appeared to choke up when the crowd responded with chants of ‘Viva il Papa’.
The new pope is a 69-year-old dual citizen, originally from Chicago, who took Peruvian citizenship after serving in that country for several decades.
Most recently he has been the head of the church’s Dicastery for Bishops overseeing the selection of new bishops.
Pope Leo XIV is not without controversy however. He was previously criticised for not doing enough within the church to deal with historic sexual assault allegations, although he had referred the complaints to the police.
Leo XIV is considered a compromise candidate, and a centrist embracing a pastoral role not unlike Francis. However he opposes ordaining women as deacons and on other issues of church doctrine is somewhat conservative.
Tim Costelloe, the Archbishop of Perth, was among the first to congratulate the new pope.
“The election of Cardinal Robert Prevost as Pope Leo XIV is yet again a sign of the wisdom behind the Italian saying that ‘those who enter the conclave as a pope inevitably emerge from the conclave as a cardinal’,” the archbishop said in a statement.
“Cardinal Prevost brought to his most recent role as Prefect of the Dicastery for Bishops an approachability and willingness to listen which were no doubt developed throughout his many years as an Augustinian missionary in Peru.
“He will be warmly welcomed by the Church in Latin America, as Pope Francis was, by the Church in the United States from where he comes, from the English-speaking world as a native English speaker, and from the whole Church as a man of God steeped in the rich spirituality of his Augustinian Religious Order.
“As Pope Leo XIV, our new pope will bring the benefit of his wide experience to the many challenges and opportunities before him.”
In a social media post, US President Donald Trump hailed the election of Pope Leo XIV as a “great honour” for the country and said he looked forward to meeting.
“Congratulations to Cardinal Robert Francis Prevost, who was just named Pope. It is such an honor to realise that he is the first American Pope. What excitement, and what a Great Honor for our Country,” Mr Trump posted on his Truth Social network.
Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney was another leader to congratulate Pope Leo XIV on his election.
“At a time of profound global challenges, may his pontificate be marked by wisdom, discernment, a deep commitment to common good, and dignity of all,” Mr Carney said.
When the six bells of St Peter’s Basilica, including the rarely used majestic “Il Campanone” began to ring in loud symphony confirming the colour of the smoke - it was initially difficult to determine the colour - people began rushing into St Peter’s Square.
The historical significance of the moment is not lost on the Italian locals and Catholic faithful.
There have been just 10 of these occasions in the past 100 years: the elections of Pope Francis, Benedict XVI, John Paul II, John Paul I, Paul VI, John XXIII, Pius XII, Pius XI, and Benedict XV.
Adopting a papal name has been a tradition going back to the sixth century when Cardinal Roman Mercurius wanted a religious and not pagan name, selecting John II. The practice became more common from the 11th century.
It then became a trend to adopt the name of the Pope who created them as cardinal. More recently the papal name indicates the direction the new leader wants to take the church.
The excitement of the crowd was palpable.
Nuns and priests joining with thousands of tourists running with mobile phones aloft down the myriad streets leading into Vatican City to capture the pictures of the smoke shown on various big screens.
https://www.theaustralian.com.au/world/white-smoke-signals-new-pope-elected-at-the-vatican/news-story/e22d2be48235eea0507123b57261b6a1
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZW-nYhIgFtw
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73486
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23012408 (091249ZMAY25) Notable: Video: PM congratulates incoming Pope Leo XIV, invites him to Australia - Anthony Albanese has congratulated Pope Leo XIV and invited the new pontiff to Australia in three years’ time. Robert Prevost, 69, was announced as the 267th leader of the Catholic Church on Thursday (local time) after the Conclave deliberated for two days - one of the shortest papal elections in history. The first American pope, he was introduced as Leo XIV to the tens of thousands gathered in St Peter’s Square. The Prime Minister said on Friday the new pope’s “leadership comes at an important time for the Catholic Church and for the world”. “I will invite His Holiness Pope Leo to Australia for the International Eucharistic Congress which is being proudly hosted in 2028,” Mr Albanese told reporters at Parliament House. “And I’ve had discussions with Archbishop Anthony Fisher of Sydney, who of course I know very well, about the importance of Australia hosting that very significant event in just a few years’ time. “And I know that the Church here in Australia is very excited to have this privilege and honour.”
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73455
>>73485
PM congratulates incoming Pope Leo XIV, invites him to Australia
Anthony Albanese has already asked the new pope to keep a date open in 2028, only hours after the pontiff’s election.
Joseph Olbrycht-Palmer - May 9, 2025
Anthony Albanese has congratulated Pope Leo XIV and invited the new pontiff to Australia in three years’ time.
Robert Prevost, 69, was announced as the 267th leader of the Catholic Church on Thursday (local time) after the Conclave deliberated for two days — one of the shortest papal elections in history.
The first American pope, he was introduced as Leo XIV to the tens of thousands gathered in St Peter’s Square.
The Prime Minister said on Friday the new pope’s “leadership comes at an important time for the Catholic Church and for the world”.
“I will invite His Holiness Pope Leo to Australia for the International Eucharistic Congress which is being proudly hosted in 2028,” Mr Albanese told reporters at Parliament House.
“And I’ve had discussions with Archbishop Anthony Fisher of Sydney, who of course I know very well, about the importance of Australia hosting that very significant event in just a few years’ time.
“And I know that the Church here in Australia is very excited to have this privilege and honour.”
He said his “government looks forward to continuing Australia’s strong relationship with the Holy See under Pope Leo XIV’s pontificate”.
Seen as a moderate, Pope Leo was in 2023 promoted to cardinal by his predecessor, the late Pope Francis.
Before his arrival in the Vatican two years ago, he had spent much of his life as a missionary in Peru and holds dual US-Peruvian citizenship.
He has been praised for his work in the South American country, but often shunned the limelight, keeping a low profile even after arriving in the Catholic Church’s centre of power.
The late Pope Francis promoted his successor again earlier this year.
“This is a moment which will bring joy and hope to Catholics everywhere,” Mr Albanese said.
“May the Papacy of Pope Leo advance the cause of peace and social justice for all humanity.”
https://www.news.com.au/national/politics/pm-congratulates-incoming-pope-leo-xiv-invites-him-to-australia/news-story/cbd5e0fd901f5a2056337702cf4be895
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HYzOzdJTCgQ
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73487
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23012428 (091258ZMAY25) Notable: Jacinta Nampijinpa Price’s defection kills off any potential Taylor-Ley leadership peace deal - A bloody civil war threatens to engulf the federal Liberal Party beyond next Tuesday’s vote to replace Peter Dutton, after Angus Taylor orchestrated the high-profile defection of Jacinta Nampijinpa Price from the Nationals to bolster his numbers. The Australian can reveal efforts to broker a peace deal between Acting Opposition Leader Sussan Ley and Mr Taylor have been abandoned, with Liberal MPs fearing a tight vote would split the party and undermine the authority of the winning candidate. Ahead of a Tuesday showdown in Canberra next week, the fight between Ms Ley and Mr Taylor turned ugly as Senator Price quit the Nationals and Liberals conceded that toxic factional NSW Liberal Party brawling had now been transplanted into the federal parliamentary team. Mr Taylor’s move to recruit Senator Price triggered anger from senior Nationals, including Matt Canavan, who compared his former colleague with Lidia Thorpe. The Nationals could now lose its major party status in the Senate after Senator Price’s defection and Nationals deputy leader Perin Davey’s failure to win re-election. The party’s numbers in the upper house will now shrink to four. The Australian understands Senator Price did not consult with Nationals colleagues before she quit.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73455
>>73478
>>73481
Jacinta Nampijinpa Price’s defection kills off any potential Taylor-Ley leadership peace deal
GEOFF CHAMBERS and RHIANNON DOWN - May 08, 2025
1/2
A bloody civil war threatens to engulf the federal Liberal Party beyond next Tuesday’s vote to replace Peter Dutton, after Angus Taylor orchestrated the high-profile defection of Jacinta Nampijinpa Price from the Nationals to bolster his numbers.
The Australian can reveal efforts to broker a peace deal between Acting Opposition Leader Sussan Ley and Mr Taylor have been abandoned, with Liberal MPs fearing a tight vote would split the party and undermine the authority of the winning candidate.
Ahead of a Tuesday showdown in Canberra next week, the fight between Ms Ley and Mr Taylor turned ugly as Senator Price quit the Nationals and Liberals conceded that toxic factional NSW Liberal Party brawling had now been transplanted into the federal parliamentary team.
Mr Taylor’s move to recruit Senator Price triggered anger from senior Nationals, including Matt Canavan, who compared his former colleague with Lidia Thorpe.
The Nationals could now lose its major party status in the Senate after Senator Price’s defection and Nationals deputy leader Perin Davey’s failure to win re-election. The party’s numbers in the upper house will now shrink to four.
The Australian understands Senator Price did not consult with Nationals colleagues before she quit.
Senior Liberal MPs backing Ms Ley and Mr Taylor on Thursday claimed to have at least 20-plus votes, including candidates and MPs subject to close vote counts in battleground seats, and senators on track to lose their spots or whose terms expire on June 30.
The Australian understands Mr Taylor is ahead of Ms Ley in the race to secure the votes of key frontbenchers Dan Tehan and Jane Hume.
Senator Hume, who as opposition finance spokeswoman worked closely with Mr Taylor ahead of the election, was earlier this year endorsed as the head of the federal Liberal moderates faction following Simon Birmingham’s retirement.
It would be a major blow for the moderates if their nominated leader sided with the conservatives.
Both camps on Thursday could not categorically claim the support of Senator Hume, who is understood to be frustrated about internal attacks targeting her role around the abandoned working from home crackdown and “Chinese spies” comments.
Some Liberal MPs said they believed Ms Ley and Mr Taylor both presented poor options for the party, given their prominent roles ahead of last weekend’s historic election defeat to Labor.
Ms Ley’s supporters have promoted the need for the party to have stronger female representation, criticised Mr Taylor’s failure to cut-through on economic policies and pledged to make the party more mainstream in the face of rising challenges in traditionally safe Coalition seats from Labor and Climate 200-backed Teals.
Supporters of Mr Taylor warned say that depending on the final make-up of the federal parliamentary team when some Senators’ terms expire, they could challenge Ms Ley if she falls over the line in the vote next week.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73488
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23012474 (091310ZMAY25) Notable: NT Nationals weigh retribution against Price for defection to Liberals - Both Coalition parties have been plunged into open warfare by conservative senator Matt Canavan’s challenge for the Nationals leadership and party officials weighing up dropping Jacinta Nampijinpa Price from their Senate ticket for defecting to the Liberals to support Angus Taylor. Canavan’s unlikely push to oust David Littleproud means the Nationals and Liberals will hold leadership duels on Monday and Tuesday, respectively, after Taylor and Sussan Ley on Friday declared their candidacy for the Liberal role. Price’s move from the Nationals to the Liberals has ramifications for both leadership contests and could reduce the salary and office entitlements of at least one Nationals senator, infuriating her colleagues. According to parliamentary rules, parties need at least five senators to have a party whip - who is responsible for party discipline, paid more and has a larger office – but Price’s departure combined with Nationals senator Perrin Davey’s loss in the election takes the party to four. Price, the popular but controversial Indigenous senator, declared on Thursday she would shift to the Liberal Party and is expected to run as Taylor’s deputy. Four Coalition sources, unable to speak publicly about internal party workings, said the Country Liberal Party, which Price represents in the Northern Territory, was considering whether to disendorse Price or opt not to pick her as a candidate at the next election.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73455
>>73478
>>73481
NT Nationals weigh retribution against Price for defection to Liberals
Paul Sakkal and Olivia Ireland - May 9, 2025
1/2
Both Coalition parties have been plunged into open warfare by conservative senator Matt Canavan’s challenge for the Nationals leadership and party officials weighing up dropping Jacinta Nampijinpa Price from their Senate ticket for defecting to the Liberals to support Angus Taylor.
Canavan’s unlikely push to oust David Littleproud means the Nationals and Liberals will hold leadership duels on Monday and Tuesday, respectively, after Taylor and Sussan Ley on Friday declared their candidacy for the Liberal role.
Price’s move from the Nationals to the Liberals has ramifications for both leadership contests and could reduce the salary and office entitlements of at least one Nationals senator, infuriating her colleagues.
According to parliamentary rules, parties need at least five senators to have a party whip – who is responsible for party discipline, paid more and has a larger office – but Price’s departure combined with Nationals senator Perrin Davey’s loss in the election takes the party to four.
Price, the popular but controversial Indigenous senator, declared on Thursday she would shift to the Liberal Party and is expected to run as Taylor’s deputy.
Four Coalition sources, unable to speak publicly about internal party workings, said the Country Liberal Party, which Price represents in the Northern Territory, was considering whether to disendorse Price or opt not to pick her as a candidate at the next election.
Price, who was contacted for comment about the threats, defended her defection to the Liberal Party in a radio interview on Friday, rejecting claims she had moved to further her ambition.
“I wanted to do it in a respectful way, so I did speak to my colleagues,” she said.
“[Being part of the Liberal Party] is something that I wanted to do from the first time I was elected,” she told 2GB. “I’ve been welcomed by Sussan Ley to the Liberal Party room, which I’m very grateful for.”
Price was coy about whether she would run for a leadership position but said that former prime minister Tony Abbott had supported her move to the Liberals. “Tony has long supported me,” Price said.
However, Nigel Scullion, a CLP senator for nearly 20 years until the 2019 election, cautioned against drastic action, saying Price’s action was “not the end of the world” because she remained a CLP member of parliament regardless of which party she sat with in Canberra.
Former CLP president Shane Stone said the defection “left a sour taste” in his mouth. “She’s had tremendous support from the National Party,” Stone said, pointing out that Littleproud secured her a portfolio to which the party was not entitled.
The injection of Price into the Liberal leadership contest has inflamed an already bitter battle that threatens ongoing party unity, regardless of the winner.
Ley claimed Price, who vowed to “make Australia great again” during the campaign, joining Taylor’s ticket had worked against the shadow treasurer because uncommitted MPs were not attracted to the idea of the senator taking on such a senior role.
The race is tight, however, and Taylor’s backers hoped Price’s popularity among Liberal branch members would make it harder for MPs to vote against him after trade spokesman Dan Tehan ruled himself out of the leadership race on Friday. “I love the Liberal Party … and I will work hard and serve in whatever capacity I am asked to rebuild our party,” Tehan said.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73489
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23012489 (091317ZMAY25) Notable: Queensland senator Matt Canavan to challenge David Littleproud as senior Nationals warn: if Coalition splits, so be it - Queensland Nationals senator Matt Canavan, a minister in the Turnbull and Morrison governments, is challenging for the leadership of the National Party, deepening the crisis in the crushed Coalition and increasing the rift with the Liberals. Senator Canavan will challenge incumbent leader David Littleproud in a partyroom meeting in Canberra on Monday with an appeal for the Nationals to fight for themselves and their supporters in the face of Liberal Party losses and the defection of Jacinta Nampijinpa Price to the bigger Coalition partner. Senior Nationals are accusing the Liberals of not behaving like true partners and of betraying the faith of the Country Liberal Party and their supporters, and blame the Liberals for the extent of the loss, warning that if the Coalition should split then “so be it”. One senior National MP said Senator Nampijinpa Price’s defection on Thursday to the Liberal Party would “have an effect on the Coalition agreement”, with the future of the agreement now in question and due to be discussed at the next National Party federal management meeting. Senator Canavan told The Australian: “On Monday, I plan to stand for the leadership of the Nationals party to bring back our fighting spirit. Only if we fight, will we have a fighting chance.”
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73455
>>73478
>>73481
Queensland senator Matt Canavan to challenge David Littleproud as senior Nationals warn: if Coalition splits, so be it
DENNIS SHANAHAN and SARAH ISON - 9 May 2025
1/2
Queensland Nationals senator Matt Canavan, a minister in the Turnbull and Morrison governments, is challenging for the leadership of the National Party, deepening the crisis in the crushed Coalition and increasing the rift with the Liberals.
Senator Canavan will challenge incumbent leader David Littleproud in a partyroom meeting in Canberra on Monday with an appeal for the Nationals to fight for themselves and their supporters in the face of Liberal Party losses and the defection of Jacinta Nampijinpa Price to the bigger Coalition partner.
Senior Nationals are accusing the Liberals of not behaving like true partners and of betraying the faith of the Country Liberal Party and their supporters, and blame the Liberals for the extent of the loss, warning that if the Coalition should split then “so be it”.
One senior National MP said Senator Nampijinpa Price’s defection on Thursday to the Liberal Party would “have an effect on the Coalition agreement”, with the future of the agreement now in question and due to be discussed at the next National Party federal management meeting.
Senator Canavan told The Australian: “On Monday, I plan to stand for the leadership of the Nationals party to bring back our fighting spirit. Only if we fight, will we have a fighting chance.”
“David Littleproud can be enormously proud of his role in defeating the voice, putting nuclear power on the agenda, and having divestiture powers adopted as Coalition policy for the first time,” the former resources minister said in an article for The Australian. “But this debate is not about protecting his job or mine. This is about fighting for the jobs and livelihoods of the many people we represent. Many of the people that vote for the Nationals party have to shower after work, not before it.
“Our plan should be based on how we can save the country, not save the party. I am standing for my party’s leadership so that I can tell my kids I did everything I could to fight for a better life for them.
“The plan we took to the last election was rejected. We need a new plan. I have been arguing for a different approach ever since we signed up to net zero. So I believe that I am in a stronger position to prosecute change.
“We should scrap the futile and unachievable goal of net-zero emissions by 2050. Net zero makes everything more expensive and it is not helping the environment given that the US, China and India are no longer even paying lip service to it.
“The primary goal of our electricity system should be to reduce power bills not reduce emissions.”
While the Nationals appear to have held their seats in the House of Representatives, the defection of Senator Nampijinpa Price to the Liberals and the loss of the Nationals’ deputy leader, Perin Davey, after she was relegated to a losing spot on the NSW Senate ticket below two Liberals, there is rising anger over the election result.
The Nationals were also unable to win back the NSW seat of Calare from former Nationals MP, Andrew Gee, who resigned from the party and won the central west seat as an independent with a big swing towards him. Nor did the Nationals gain the new seat of Bullwinkel in Western Australia or the Labor-held seat of Bendigo after a close contest. But because of the extent of the Liberal losses, including Peter Dutton’s own seat of Dickson in Queensland, the Nationals now have their greatest proportion of Coalition seats since the 1960s and ’70s.
Nationals Senate leader Bridget McKenzie has publicly blamed the Liberals for the extent of the loss and complained about the “recruitment” of Senator Nampijinpa Price into the Liberals’ partyroom five days after she was elected as a CLP senator. On Friday Senator McKenzie told The Australian the Nationals had taken collective responsibility for the loss and were better placed than then Liberals in “an arithmetic and cultural sense”.
“What I’m very concerned about is that it now seems that the Liberal Party was actively recruiting Senator Nampijinpa Price five days out from an election. That is not the behaviour of partners, of trusted partners,” she said.
“Those of us in the National Party aren’t just Liberals that live in the country. We actually have a very separate political philosophy and a long tradition. We’re over 100 years old, and we are very renowned in our communities for delivering for them.
“The Liberal Party has got a lot of deep thinking to do. We wish them well with that, but they shouldn’t be seeking to damage us in the process of trying to rebuild themselves.”
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73490
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23012508 (091326ZMAY25) Notable: China criticises Australia over joint exercises with Philippines, US in South China Sea - China's Foreign Ministry has sharply criticised Australia after it conducted another joint military exercise in the South China Sea with the US and the Philippines, accusing all three nations of trying to "create trouble." The Royal Australian Navy's destroyer HMAS Sydney joined a guided missile frigate from the Philippine Navy and aircraft from both the US and the Philippines last week to conduct the drills. Clashes between China's coast guard and vessels from the Philippines have intensified over the last 18 months, and several countries - including the US, Japan, Australia and Canada — have responded by stepping up joint military exercises with the Philippines in the contested waters. China's Foreign Ministry spokesman Lin Jian told reporters in Beijing that the United States was using the Philippines as a "pawn" against China, and that Manila had "brought in and collaborated with forces outside the region to create disruptions and flex military muscles". "The US and other countries outside the region have patched up small groupings in the South China Sea to stoke confrontation in the name of cooperation, flex military muscles in the name of freedom, and create trouble in the name of upholding order," he said. "They are the biggest source of risks undermining the peace and stability in the South China Sea." China claims almost the entirety of the South China Sea as its territory, and has ignored a 2016 ruling which found that claim had no basis under international law. Australia hasn't responded directly to China's most recent criticism but the Department of Defence said last week the joint exercise was aimed at "build(ing) mutual understanding and interoperability between nations and armed forces."
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73464
>>73475
>>73484
China criticises Australia over joint exercises with Philippines, US in South China Sea
Stephen Dziedzic - 9 May 2025
China's Foreign Ministry has sharply criticised Australia after it conducted another joint military exercise in the South China Sea with the US and the Philippines, accusing all three nations of trying to "create trouble."
The Royal Australian Navy's destroyer HMAS Sydney joined a guided missile frigate from the Philippine Navy and aircraft from both the US and the Philippines last week to conduct the drills.
Clashes between China's coast guard and vessels from the Philippines have intensified over the last 18 months, and several countries — including the US, Japan, Australia and Canada — have responded by stepping up joint military exercises with the Philippines in the contested waters.
China's Foreign Ministry spokesman Lin Jian told reporters in Beijing that the United States was using the Philippines as a "pawn" against China, and that Manila had "brought in and collaborated with forces outside the region to create disruptions and flex military muscles".
"The US and other countries outside the region have patched up small groupings in the South China Sea to stoke confrontation in the name of cooperation, flex military muscles in the name of freedom, and create trouble in the name of upholding order," he said.
"They are the biggest source of risks undermining the peace and stability in the South China Sea."
China claims almost the entirety of the South China Sea as its territory, and has ignored a 2016 ruling which found that claim had no basis under international law.
Australia hasn't responded directly to China's most recent criticism but the Department of Defence said last week the joint exercise was aimed at "build(ing) mutual understanding and interoperability between nations and armed forces."
"Australia and our partners share a commitment to upholding the right to freedom of navigation and overflight, other lawful uses of the sea and international airspace, and other maritime rights under international law," the department said.
"By training and operating together, forces can build upon shared tactics, techniques, and procedures to enhance interoperability and readiness to respond to shared security challenges."
China has been trying to force the Philippines off several disputed areas in the South China Sea, with Manila accusing Beijing of bullying behaviour and intimidation.
The US, Australia and the Philippines conducted joint exercises in the South China Sea with Japan in February. Australia also sent a surveillance aircraft to take part in joint exercises with the US, Philippines and Canada in August last year.
Analysts say China's recent partial navigation of the Australian mainland was aimed, in part, at dissuading the Albanese government from joining multilateral exercises in the South China Sea.
But the Albanese government has been adamant that doing so is critical to maintaining international law and freedom of navigation in the region, and signalled that it has no intention of reducing its activity in the region.
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-05-09/china-criticises-australia-us-philippines-south-china-sea-drills/105271426
https://www.fmprc.gov.cn/mfa_eng/xw/fyrbt/lxjzh/202505/t20250508_11617555.html
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73491
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23012560 (091350ZMAY25) Notable: Google AI chatbot, Gemini, to be available to Aussie kids under 13 within months - Google will launch its Gemini AI chatbot for Australian children under 13 within months, the ABC can reveal. The tech giant is rolling out the program in the US this week, with a worldwide launch to follow in the coming months, although no date has yet been specified. The ABC understands the chatbot will be automatically available to children via Google's Family Link app after the launch, although parents will have the option to switch it off. "It's unusual to me that this would be turned on by default," said Professor Lisa Given, an expert in the social impact of technology at RMIT University. "It relies on parents … or the child themselves, having the skill to navigate the controls and turn things off." Multiple experts expressed alarm at the plan, saying AI chatbots pose more acute risks for children. They warned Google's Gemini chatbot has the potential to confuse, misinform and manipulate children. "Systems that are enabled by AI can certainly hallucinate or make up information," Professor Given said. Every expert the ABC spoke to had concerns younger people may have difficulty understanding that the chatbots are not human. "These systems really attempt to replicate or mirror how people engage with each other," said Professor Given, adding that even adults weren't immune to the illusion. "I've done some research looking at Replika, where adults were actually very much taken in … and really came to believe that they had a relationship with the system itself, very much like a friend or even a romantic partner," she said.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Google AI chatbot, Gemini, to be available to Aussie kids under 13 within months
Ange Lavoipierre - 9 May 2025
1/2
Google will launch its Gemini AI chatbot for Australian children under 13 within months, the ABC can reveal.
The tech giant is rolling out the program in the US this week, with a worldwide launch to follow in the coming months, although no date has yet been specified.
The announcement has prompted calls for the government to consider banning AI chatbots for children, in the same way it banned social media for children under 16.
"It would've been better if we'd erred on the side of caution with social media, and we didn't," said Professor Toby Walsh, a leading expert in Artificial Intelligence University of New South Wales.
He's urging leaders to "seriously consider putting age limits on this technology."
The ABC understands the chatbot will be automatically available to children via Google's Family Link app after the launch, although parents will have the option to switch it off.
"It's unusual to me that this would be turned on by default," said Professor Lisa Given, an expert in the social impact of technology at RMIT University.
"It relies on parents … or the child themselves, having the skill to navigate the controls and turn things off.
"And it may only be turned off at the point that it raises problems … but in a way it's too late at that point."
Google isn't the only company whose AI chatbot is available to younger children.
For example, OpenAI's website states that ChatGPT is "not meant for" people younger than 13, even though it's free on the open web.
But Google's Gemini tool is one of the few mainstream tools explicitly targeted at users that age.
"The problem is that [the tech companies are] tone deaf to the concerns, I think, that many parents have," Professor Walsh said.
"And the reason that they're tone deaf is … the financial incentives that they're looking at; how to onboard the next generation of users."
AI chatbots for under-13s: What could go wrong?
Multiple experts expressed alarm at the plan, saying AI chatbots pose more acute risks for children.
They warned Google's Gemini chatbot has the potential to confuse, misinform and manipulate children.
"Systems that are enabled by AI can certainly hallucinate or make up information," Professor Given said.
"You have to have some fairly sophisticated skills in terms of discerning truthfulness."
Every expert the ABC spoke to had concerns younger people may have difficulty understanding that the chatbots are not human.
"These systems really attempt to replicate or mirror how people engage with each other," said Professor Given, adding that even adults weren't immune to the illusion.
"I've done some research looking at Replika, where adults were actually very much taken in … and really came to believe that they had a relationship with the system itself, very much like a friend or even a romantic partner," she said.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73492
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23012568 (091357ZMAY25) Notable: ‘I build relationships’: Albanese ready for crucial tariff negotiations with Trump - Anthony Albanese says his people skills will stand him in good stead when he sits down with Donald Trump in the Oval Office in coming weeks, in what looms as a pivotal meeting to plead Australia’s case for a tariff carve-out. “I build relationships with people,” the Prime Minister told Sky News when asked how he would navigate the encounter. “I have many friends in the business community, in the union movement, in civil society, groups that I’ve engaged with for a long period of time. “I’m pretty upfront in how I engage with people and I’ve developed that as well on an international level.” Mr Albanese will go into the meeting with a renewed mandate and fresh confidence following his election win and President Trump’s conciliatory sit-down with Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney this week. A soon-to-be announced trade deal between the US and Britain, teased by Mr Trump on his Truth Social network on Wednesday, will also set a positive tone for the talks. The agreement will be the first of Mr Trump’s second term and comes as his administration progresses trade talks with India and Japan, and prepares for critical negotiations with China. Don Farrell, who hopes to be reappointed Trade Minister when Mr Albanese unveils his frontbench in coming days, is also preparing a diplomatic push to shore up Australia’s trade ties. If he retains his job, as is widely expected, he is likely to attend the APEC trade ministers meeting in South Korea next Thursday for talks with US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer and rattled Asian counterparts whose economies could be ruined by Mr Trump’s tariff blitz.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73455
>>73472
‘I build relationships’: Albanese ready for crucial tariff negotiations with Trump
BEN PACKHAM - May 08, 2025
Anthony Albanese says his people skills will stand him in good stead when he sits down with Donald Trump in the Oval Office in coming weeks, in what looms as a pivotal meeting to plead Australia’s case for a tariff carve-out.
“I build relationships with people,” the Prime Minister told Sky News when asked how he would navigate the encounter.
“I have many friends in the business community, in the union movement, in civil society, groups that I’ve engaged with for a long period of time.
“I’m pretty upfront in how I engage with people and I’ve developed that as well on an international level.”
Mr Albanese will go into the meeting with a renewed mandate and fresh confidence following his election win and President Trump’s conciliatory sit-down with Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney this week.
A soon-to-be announced trade deal between the US and Britain, teased by Mr Trump on his Truth Social network on Wednesday, will also set a positive tone for the talks.
The agreement will be the first of Mr Trump’s second term and comes as his administration progresses trade talks with India and Japan, and prepares for critical negotiations with China.
Don Farrell, who hopes to be reappointed Trade Minister when Mr Albanese unveils his frontbench in coming days, is also preparing a diplomatic push to shore up Australia’s trade ties.
If he retains his job, as is widely expected, he is likely to attend the APEC trade ministers meeting in South Korea next Thursday for talks with US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer and rattled Asian counterparts whose economies could be ruined by Mr Trump’s tariff blitz.
Preparations are also under way for video conferences with new EU Trade Commissioner Maros Sefcovic and Indian Trade Minister Piyush Goyal to kickstart fresh negotiations on Australia-EU and Australia-India deals.
Australia is prepared to scrap the $5.2bn luxury car tax to secure a free-trade agreement with the EU if European negotiators offer a better deal for Australian agricultural exports than they did in 2023, when talks on a proposed FTA collapsed.
Senator Farrell, who spoke to Mr Sefcovic on election night, said he believed past roadblocks with the EU could be overcome.
“I have a sense that the mood has changed, certainly in Australia, but also in Europe,” he said.
“I’m very confident that with sensible discussions with this new man in the EU that we can make some progress and very quickly come to a settlement on a free-trade agreement.”
Senator Farrell said he believed a deal with India was imminent.
“The Indians also contacted me. We were very close to a free-trade agreement with them, and I think we can move very quickly now to finalise that agreement,” he said.
The government is offering New Delhi priority access to Australia’s critical minerals and the nation’s labour market to get the agreement across the line.
Former European Commission deputy secretary-general Hervé Jouanjean sounded a note of caution on the prospects for an Australia-EU FTA.
He told The Australian that scrapping the luxury car tax might not be enough, especially if Victoria and Queensland retained their own versions of the tax.
“My personal view would be that something on cars would certainly be welcome but I am not sure that this will be enough to settle the whole negotiation,” he said.
The Prime Minister is expected to combine his upcoming visit to Washington with a trip to Canada for the G7 leaders summit, from June 11-13, which Mr Carney has invited him to attend. Mr Albanese will travel to Jakarta next week for talks with Indonesian President Prabowo Subianto.
https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/i-build-relationships-albanese-ready-for-crucial-tariff-negotiations-with-trump/news-story/e23e24c8adfe701c22ce35cbc6b313e9
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73493
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23020102 (110931ZMAY25) Notable: Video: Dumped cabinet minister says Richard Marles a 'factional assassin', and demotion partly due to outspoken views on Gaza - Dumped cabinet minister Ed Husic says his decision to speak out on the conflict in Gaza was partly to blame for him being dropped from the frontbench, while making an extraordinary accusation that the deputy prime minister acted as a "factional assassin" out of naked ambition for his branch. Mr Husic told Insiders his experience in cabinet was that Labor had to be "encouraged" to speak out on the issue, but said he would not be silent on it. "To be able to take part in a cabinet meant a great deal. You can't celebrate diversity and expect it to sit in a corner silent," Mr Husic said. "I certainly took the view you need to speak up for the communities you care about. I certainly tried to help us navigate wretchedly difficult issues, such as Gaza post the horrors of October 7. "I don't think I could ever stay silent in the face of innocent civilians slaughtered in tens of thousands, starved out of Gaza." The outgoing minister also lashed out at Deputy Prime Minister Richard Marles, who had a hand in Mr Husic being booted from the frontbench. "I think people, when they look at a deputy prime minister, they expect to see a statesman, not a factional assassin," he said. "The difficult issue here is that we've had bare-faced ambition and a deputy prime minister wield a factional club to reshape the ministry." He added that Prime Minister Anthony Albanese should have intervened to stop the factional play, but failed to do so.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73455
>>73482
Dumped cabinet minister says Richard Marles a 'factional assassin', and demotion partly due to outspoken views on Gaza
Jake Evans - 11 May 2025
1/2
Dumped cabinet minister Ed Husic says his decision to speak out on the conflict in Gaza was partly to blame for him being dropped from the frontbench, while making an extraordinary accusation that the deputy prime minister acted as a "factional assassin" out of naked ambition for his branch.
Mr Husic told Insiders his experience in cabinet was that Labor had to be "encouraged" to speak out on the issue, but said he would not be silent on it.
"To be able to take part in a cabinet meant a great deal. You can't celebrate diversity and expect it to sit in a corner silent," Mr Husic said.
"I certainly took the view you need to speak up for the communities you care about. I certainly tried to help us navigate wretchedly difficult issues, such as Gaza post the horrors of October 7.
"I don't think I could ever stay silent in the face of innocent civilians slaughtered in tens of thousands, starved out of Gaza."
The outgoing minister also lashed out at Deputy Prime Minister Richard Marles, who had a hand in Mr Husic being booted from the frontbench.
"I think people, when they look at a deputy prime minister, they expect to see a statesman, not a factional assassin," he said.
"The difficult issue here is that we've had bare-faced ambition and a deputy prime minister wield a factional club to reshape the ministry."
He added that Prime Minister Anthony Albanese should have intervened to stop the factional play, but failed to do so.
Mr Husic said he respected the need for factions to manage merit and ambition, but Mr Marles would have to answer for his role in himself and Attorney-General Mark Dreyfus being demoted.
The pair were dropped in a brutal factional play on Friday in order to make way for Victorian MPs Daniel Mulino and Sam Rae, a close ally of Mr Marles, and to balance the left and right factions in NSW, from where Mr Husic hails.
Mr Husic, the first Muslim cabinet minister and the first to be sworn in on the Quran, has been one of the most vocal in the government on the conflict in Gaza.
The Sydney politician has also been a key player in engaging with Muslim communities angry at the government's response to Israel's war following the October 7 attack by Hamas.
Mr Husic said there needed to be "faith in Muslim communities that their voice was being heard", but that sometimes had to be encouraged.
Able to speak more freely now that he is on the backbench, Mr Husic was blunt in his assessment of the Netanyahu government.
"We've seen just in the past week or so, the Israeli parliament say it wants to annex Gaza and effectively that is a form of ethnic cleansing. We've seen the starvation of its people through the failure to provide humanitarian assistance," he said.
"It should be held to account. Starvation is a war crime."
The conflict has roiled within Labor, last year prompting Muslim senator Fatima Payman to quit the party after it punished her for voting against the government on a motion to accuse Israel of genocide in Gaza.
A United Nations report earlier this year accused Israel of "genocidal acts", which was rejected by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu as false, biased and antisemitic.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73494
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23024096 (120941ZMAY25) Notable: Talent over factions: Angus Taylor and Sussan Ley promise to end the Liberal civil war and fight PM - Angus Taylor has pledged to reward talent over factional allegiances, elevate more women into leadership positions and make the Liberal Party campaign machine “fitter, flatter, faster and more focused” ahead of his showdown with Sussan Ley on Tuesday. In an interview with The Australian, the opposition Treasury spokesman said the Coalition must focus on policies that “go for growth” and allow a full range of technologies to deliver “the affordable, reliable energy Australians want”. Mr Taylor and Ms Ley - who spent Mother’s Day at home with their families on Sunday – are locked in a tight contest to replace Peter Dutton as opposition leader. The combatants and their supporters will hit the phones on Monday as they seek to win over undecided colleagues ahead of the federal Liberal Party parliamentary team voting for a new leader and deputy leader in Canberra on Tuesday morning. In a video statement released by Ms Ley on the weekend, the Acting Opposition Leader said “we have enormous depth of talent in our partyroom, and I want to draw on all of it over the next three years”. “We will develop strong policy offerings through robust party room processes so we can demonstrate we will deliver better outcomes for all Australians. We need to change, the Liberal Party must respect modern Australia, reflect modern Australia and represent modern Australia,” Ms Ley said. ‘My election as leader of the Liberal Party would send a very strong signal that we understand that things must be done differently.” Responding to concerns raised by some Liberal MPs about NSW factionalism infecting the federal partyroom, Mr Taylor said “our numbers are now so depleted that if we start selecting what roles people play based on tribal allegiances we will not succeed, full stop”.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73455
>>73478
>>73481
Talent over factions: Angus Taylor and Sussan Ley promise to end the Liberal civil war and fight PM
GEOFF CHAMBERS - 12 May 2025
1/2
Angus Taylor has pledged to reward talent over factional allegiances, elevate more women into leadership positions and make the Liberal Party campaign machine “fitter, flatter, faster and more focused” ahead of his showdown with Sussan Ley on Tuesday.
In an interview with The Australian, the opposition Treasury spokesman said the Coalition must focus on policies that “go for growth” and allow a full range of technologies to deliver “the affordable, reliable energy Australians want”.
Mr Taylor and Ms Ley – who spent Mother’s Day at home with their families on Sunday – are locked in a tight contest to replace Peter Dutton as opposition leader.
The combatants and their supporters will hit the phones on Monday as they seek to win over undecided colleagues ahead of the federal Liberal Party parliamentary team voting for a new leader and deputy leader in Canberra on Tuesday morning.
In a video statement released by Ms Ley on the weekend, the Acting Opposition Leader said “we have enormous depth of talent in our partyroom, and I want to draw on all of it over the next three years”.
“We will develop strong policy offerings through robust party room processes so we can demonstrate we will deliver better outcomes for all Australians. We need to change, the Liberal Party must respect modern Australia, reflect modern Australia and represent modern Australia,” Ms Ley said.
‘My election as leader of the Liberal Party would send a very strong signal that we understand that things must be done differently.”
Responding to concerns raised by some Liberal MPs about NSW factionalism infecting the federal partyroom, Mr Taylor said “our numbers are now so depleted that if we start selecting what roles people play based on tribal allegiances we will not succeed, full stop”.
“We have to reach across the divide and have the very best people on the ground in every area,” Mr Taylor told The Australian. “The team is so small now, relative to what it has been in the past, that there’s lots of work to do for everybody as long as we are aligned in the belief that the Labor Party can’t deliver what Australia needs and we can.”
Mr Taylor, who cited strong working relationships with junior ministers he had previously collaborated with, including Tim Wilson, Dean Smith and James McGrath, said: “It’s talent and merit and what we can offer first, and all of those tribal allegiances need to come a distant second.
“I’m not naive to the fact that they exist, but I do believe we can bridge across those if we all recognise that this is a massive regroup and rebuild job we’ve got to do and we’ve got to get back in the fight.”
After former state and territory Liberal leaders Gladys Berejiklian, Barry O’Farrell, Jeff Kennett, Nick Greiner and Shane Stone endorsed Ms Ley as leader, former prime minister Tony Abbott on Sunday supported Mr Taylor and Jacinta Nampijinpa Price as the new Liberal Party leadership team, after Senator Price said she would nominate for deputy leader.
Supporters of Ms Ley said she was running an open ticket that wasn’t predicated on any deals. They also said she would base her frontbench on merit and putting the best team on the pitch.
It is understood that opposition energy spokesman Ted O’Brien is considering a separate run for the deputy leadership after Dan Tehan pulled out of the race. Ms Ley, who has been accused by rivals of launching her leadership campaign ahead of the election to gain an advantage, has strongly pushed the need for more women in the party.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73495
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23024121 (120949ZMAY25) Notable: Video: Albanese makes big changes, unveils new Plibersek role in major reshuffle - Prime Minister Anthony Albanese will fly to Rome within days to join world leaders at the inauguration mass for Pope Leo XIV, after overhauling federal cabinet by naming new ministers to workplace relations, environment and social services. A day after Husic called Deputy Prime Minister and Defence Minister Richard Marles a “factional assassin” for removing colleagues, Albanese played down the internal strife by saying the reshuffle followed the usual process in the Labor caucus to choose the frontbench. Albanese promised an “ambitious agenda to change this country for the better” and noted that Labor would have the largest federal caucus since federation, with at least 92 seats. The Coalition has only 41 seats in the latest counting. In a sign of the scale of the changes, Tanya Plibersek has been moved sideways from her old portfolio of environment to become minister for social services, a key task after past departmental scandals over robo-debt and income support. Albanese has installed Queensland senator Murray Watt as minister for environment and water at a time when the government wants to restart talks with the Greens to pass a stalled bill to set up an agency to oversee project approvals, the environment protection agency. Amanda Rishworth, former minister for social services, becomes minister for employment and workplace relations to replace Watt.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73455
>>73482
Albanese makes big changes, unveils new Plibersek role in major reshuffle
David Crowe - May 12, 2025
Prime Minister Anthony Albanese will fly to Rome within days to join world leaders at the inauguration mass for Pope Leo XIV, after overhauling federal cabinet by naming new ministers to workplace relations, environment and social services.
Albanese is expected to meet counterparts, including Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney and European Commission president Ursula von der Leyen at the Vatican, amid global concerns about American policy on trade and security under US President Donald Trump.
The plans come after the prime minister promoted five colleagues and moved six others to set up a new ministry for Labor’s second term in power, acting on a factional deal last week to remove Mark Dreyfus and Ed Husic from the cabinet.
A day after Husic called Deputy Prime Minister and Defence Minister Richard Marles a “factional assassin” for removing colleagues, Albanese played down the internal strife by saying the reshuffle followed the usual process in the Labor caucus to choose the frontbench.
Albanese promised an “ambitious agenda to change this country for the better” and noted that Labor would have the largest federal caucus since federation, with at least 92 seats. The Coalition has only 41 seats in the latest counting.
“I’m deeply humbled by the trust that was put into my government with the election, and we certainly won’t take it for granted,” he said.
Albanese will leave Australia early on Wednesday to visit Indonesian president Prabowo Subianto in Jakarta, and then fly to Rome for talks with other world leaders as well as the formal mass to mark the inauguration of Pope Leo this Sunday.
The talks will include tighter co-operation with Canada, a key security ally that has felt the brunt of Trump’s ire, and the prospect of a broader trade agreement with the European Union, a deal that was shelved last year because it did not do enough for Australian beef and lamb exporters.
Albanese elevated two members of the Left faction, Anne Aly and Tim Ayres, into federal cabinet, after last week’s factional deals removed Dreyfus and Husic.
Aly will become the first Muslim woman to hold a cabinet position, being named minister for multicultural affairs and international development, as well as being responsible for small business.
Ayres becomes minister for industry and innovation as well as minister for science, replacing Husic.
In a sign of the scale of the changes, Tanya Plibersek has been moved sideways from her old portfolio of environment to become minister for social services, a key task after past departmental scandals over robo-debt and income support.
Albanese has installed Queensland senator Murray Watt as minister for environment and water at a time when the government wants to restart talks with the Greens to pass a stalled bill to set up an agency to oversee project approvals, the environment protection agency.
Anika Wells trades her old portfolio of aged care for communications and sport, a key position when the government must consider whether to risk blowback from media companies and professional sporting bodies by regulating online gambling more strictly.
Amanda Rishworth, former minister for social services, becomes minister for employment and workplace relations to replace Watt.
Michelle Rowland, the former communications minister, becomes attorney-general to replace Dreyfus.
The reshuffle comes little more than a week after a huge election win for Labor, which increased its majority as the Coalition suffered huge losses.
Treasurer Jim Chalmers, Foreign Minister Penny Wong and Deputy Prime Minister and Defence Minister Richard Marles have retained their positions.
Asked about Plibersek’s move, Albanese gave a brief answer: “She was very positive about the portfolio.”
The National Disability Insurance Scheme will be overseen by two members of the executive, with Health Minister Mark Butler gaining responsibility for the NDIS at cabinet level. NSW senator Jenny McAllister, previously in charge of emergency management, becomes minister for the NDIS in the outer ministry.
This follows the retirement of former NDIS Minister Bill Shorten before the election.
Andrew Charlton – someone the prime minister was keen to promote – will become the cabinet secretary and assistant minister for science and the digital economy.
The ministry is set to be sworn in by Governor-General Sam Mostyn at 9am on Tuesday.
https://www.theage.com.au/politics/federal/albanese-makes-sweeping-changes-to-frontbench-20250512-p5lycj.html
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5ionU1tjLmo
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73496
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23024135 (120953ZMAY25) Notable: David Littleproud remains as Nationals leader, seeing off Matt Canavan challenge - David Littleproud will continue as federal leader of the Nationals after a party room vote in Canberra, seeing off a challenge from his colleague Matt Canavan. Mr Littleproud, who became leader in 2022, was approved to continue by his colleagues in the closed-door ballot, after an election which saw the minor party go backwards by one seat in each house. The margin has not been disclosed. Kevin Hogan was chosen as deputy leader and Bridget McKenzie remained as Senate leader. Mr Hogan was the opposition trade spokesperson in the last parliament, and Senator McKenzie was infrastructure spokesperson. "It's a great honour to lead our great party. I'm proud of our achievements over the last three years, three years where I think we set the policy agenda," Mr Littleproud said after the meeting. National Party rules see the leadership "spilled" automatically after each election, even if there is no rival. But the conservative Senator Canavan revealed late on Friday he would nominate, saying the party needed to be "louder" in opposition to climate targets.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73455
>>73481
>>73489
David Littleproud remains as Nationals leader, seeing off Matt Canavan challenge
Tom Crowley - 12 May 2025
David Littleproud will continue as federal leader of the Nationals after a party room vote in Canberra, seeing off a challenge from his colleague Matt Canavan.
Mr Littleproud, who became leader in 2022, was approved to continue by his colleagues in the closed-door ballot, after an election which saw the minor party go backwards by one seat in each house. The margin has not been disclosed.
Kevin Hogan was chosen as deputy leader and Bridget McKenzie remained as Senate leader. Mr Hogan was the opposition trade spokesperson in the last parliament, and Senator McKenzie was infrastructure spokesperson.
"It's a great honour to lead our great party. I'm proud of our achievements over the last three years, three years where I think we set the policy agenda," Mr Littleproud said after the meeting.
National Party rules see the leadership "spilled" automatically after each election, even if there is no rival.
But the conservative Senator Canavan revealed late on Friday he would nominate, saying the party needed to be "louder" in opposition to climate targets.
The party room was rocked last week by the defection of senator Jacinta Nampijinpa Price to the Liberal Party, where she intends to nominate for the deputy leadership on Tuesday.
Senator Price's move, which saw the party reduced to just four senators, was openly scorned by Senator Canavan and tersely acknowledged by Mr Littleproud, and has led to misgivings within the party about its senior coalition partner.
While the Liberals went backwards most severely in the recent federal election, the Nationals also fell short of their aspirations, failing to claim the seats of Bendigo or Bullwinkel and failing to retain the seat of Calare, won by former Nationals MP-turned-independent Andrew Gee.
No word yet on nuclear policy
Mr Littleproud said the Nationals' campaigning on the Voice referendum under his leadership had "shifted the result" and hailed the minor party's influence in pushing for the adoption of a nuclear energy policy and supermarket divestiture powers.
But he declined to say whether the nuclear policy would stay the same amid calls from Senator Canavan and others to dump net zero and re-embrace coal.
"We're going to review all our policies and we'll do that in a calm, methodical way … The reality is that the leader of the National Party doesn't determine the policy direction of our party, the collective does," he said, though adding "the fundamentals haven't changed" on nuclear.
Senator McKenzie said both Coalition partners needed to "listen to the Australian people with humility, understanding that these were collective decisions of both the Liberal and the National party".
"We need to respect their decision and we need to have a deep, honest look at what went wrong."
Mr Littleproud said he was "disappointed" about Senator Price's defection, but that his party would "be the adults in the room, because that's what the National Party's been for the last three years".
The Liberal party room will meet on Tuesday, and the Greens on Thursday, after Anthony Albanese revealed his new-look ministry on Monday.
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-05-12/littleproud-remains-as-nationals-leader/105282850
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73497
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23024162 (121000ZMAY25) Notable: Liberal candidate for Kooyong Amelia Hamer concedes defeat to teal MP Monique Ryan - Liberal candidate Amelia Hamer has formally conceded defeat to teal MP Monique Ryan in the seat of Kooyong, saying the remaining ballots would not be enough to secure her victory. In a statement released on Monday afternoon, Ms Hamer said she had phoned Dr Ryan to congratulate her on her re-election and praised the “beautiful local community” of Kooyong. “Whilst counting continues, it is now clear that the remaining ballots will not deliver us the majority we need to win the seat,” Ms Hamer said. “Standing as the Liberal candidate for Kooyong has been an honour.” The contest in the once blue-ribbon Liberal stronghold has been closely watched following Dr Ryan’s 2022 win over then-treasurer Josh Frydenberg. “Liberal values - like individual freedom, equality of opportunity, and free enterprise – are timeless. They are worth fighting for,” Ms Hamer said. “We are so lucky to have a beautiful local community, a fair democracy, and a wonderful country. I hope to play my small part in making it a better place, now and into the future.” Dr Ryan claimed victory of the seat in an official statement released shortly after Ms Hamer’s announcement. “Serving as the member for Kooyong has been the privilege of a lifetime. I’m incredibly honoured to continue in this role, and thank the electorate for this opportunity,” she said.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73455
>>73477
Liberal candidate for Kooyong Amelia Hamer concedes defeat to teal MP Monique Ryan
ZOE DE KONING and MOHAMMAD ALFARES - 12 May 2025
Liberal candidate Amelia Hamer has formally conceded defeat to teal MP Monique Ryan in the seat of Kooyong, saying the remaining ballots would not be enough to secure her victory.
In a statement released on Monday afternoon, Ms Hamer said she had phoned Dr Ryan to congratulate her on her re-election and praised the “beautiful local community” of Kooyong.
“Whilst counting continues, it is now clear that the remaining ballots will not deliver us the majority we need to win the seat,” Ms Hamer said.
“Standing as the Liberal candidate for Kooyong has been an honour.”
The contest in the once blue-ribbon Liberal stronghold has been closely watched following Dr Ryan’s 2022 win over then-treasurer Josh Frydenberg.
“Liberal values – like individual freedom, equality of opportunity, and free enterprise – are timeless. They are worth fighting for,” Ms Hamer said.
“We are so lucky to have a beautiful local community, a fair democracy, and a wonderful country. I hope to play my small part in making it a better place, now and into the future.”
Dr Ryan claimed victory of the seat in an official statement released shortly after Ms Hamer’s announcement.
“Serving as the member for Kooyong has been the privilege of a lifetime. I’m incredibly honoured to continue in this role, and thank the electorate for this opportunity,” she said.
The former pediatric neurologist confirmed she had received a call from Ms Hamer on Monday, and “wished her the best for her future endeavours”.
“I’m grateful for the opportunity to continue to hold the government to account on the economy, climate, health, and the other critical issues for my community,” Dr Ryan said.
“It’s a crucial time for Australia – we’re facing a cost-of-living crisis, housing shortages, increasing intergenerational inequity, and our response to the global challenge of climate change has been too slow and too incremental.
“With the Albanese government holding an increased majority, it’s time for it to show the courage we need – and respect the mandate given to it by the Australian public – by taking real action on these issues.”
https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/liberal-candidate-for-kooyong-amelia-hamer-concedes-defeat-to-teal-mp-monique-ryan/news-story/00578d5f9131bd2d58855128de42dcc1
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73498
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23024200 (121012ZMAY25) Notable: Video: Australian Nick Parsons killed in Ukraine while clearing mines - A former Australian Defence Force member killed in eastern Ukraine while clearing mines for an explosives disposal charity has been described as “a hero for Ukrainians” who was engaged in dangerous work close to the frontlines. Nick Parsons, who was working for a US-registered organisation named Prevail Together, was killed last week in Izyum. A Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade spokeswoman confirmed DFAT was “providing consular assistance to the family of an Australian man who died in Ukraine”. Mr Parsons, believed to be from Queensland, had been working to clear mines and other unexploded ordnance in Ukraine following a long stint in the Australian Defence Force, which one source said he had recently left. Izyum is a city in the Kharkiv Oblast region approximately 40km from the frontline. Ukrainian ambassador Vasyl Myroshnychenko told The Australian on Monday Mr Parsons was “a hero for Ukrainians who was on a very important mission”. “There are individuals like Nick Parsons who couldn’t sit on the couch, and decided to go and travel,” Mr Myroshnychenko said. “I understand he was trained to be an engineer … I understand there was also another British guy who he was with, and both of them got killed, as mates being there, they got rid of unexploded ordnance as well as mines.”
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Australian Nick Parsons killed in Ukraine while clearing mines
LIAM MENDES - 12 May 2025
A former Australian Defence Force member killed in eastern Ukraine while clearing mines for an explosives disposal charity has been described as “a hero for Ukrainians” who was engaged in dangerous work close to the frontlines.
Nick Parsons, who was working for a US-registered organisation named Prevail Together, was killed last week in Izyum.
A Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade spokeswoman confirmed DFAT was “providing consular assistance to the family of an Australian man who died in Ukraine”.
Mr Parsons, believed to be from Queensland, had been working to clear mines and other unexploded ordnance in Ukraine following a long stint in the Australian Defence Force, which one source said he had recently left.
Izyum is a city in the Kharkiv Oblast region approximately 40km from the frontline.
Ukrainian ambassador Vasyl Myroshnychenko told The Australian on Monday Mr Parsons was “a hero for Ukrainians who was on a very important mission”.
“There are individuals like Nick Parsons who couldn’t sit on the couch, and decided to go and travel,” Mr Myroshnychenko said.
“I understand he was trained to be an engineer … I understand there was also another British guy who he was with, and both of them got killed, as mates being there, they got rid of unexploded ordnance as well as mines.”
Mr Myroshnychenko said the size of the area that had to be de-mined because of Russia’s invasion in February 2022 – now into its third year – is larger than Switzerland.
“It’s certainly a dangerous job, as you can imagine, it’s kind of one of those 50-50, jobs, 50 per cent you’re going to live, 50 per cent you going die,” the ambassador said.
“It’s very sad and it’s tough news for everybody, he was a hero for us on a very important mission.
“(He was) very close to the frontlines, so that part of Ukraine, which is close to the Russian border, and where the frontlines are, it’s heavily mined, lots of unexploded ordnance, because Russians are shelling us all the time.”
In a social media post on May 7, Prevail Together said it had received “devastating news” that its founder and chairman, Christopher “Swampy” Garrett, and other team members had been “severely injured in an incident near Izyum”.
Mr Garrett was described on social media as “one of the best”, and had been engaged in mine clearing in Ukraine since 2014.
“Most people run from danger,” one mourner said.
“Swampy and his crew are true heroes for the work they do to as first responders, trainers and humanitarian mine action advocates. My thoughts are with the team and their families during this difficult time.”
At the outbreak of Russia’s invasion in February 2022 Mr Garrett had rushed to Ukraine to continue his work, where he described himself as an “explosive bin man”.
In an interview with The Times in May that year he said that not long after Kyiv was almost surrounded by Russian forces, he cleared tonnes of explosives in surrounding cities where they had left booby traps in doorways, washing machines, cupboards, car boots and even under the corpses of civilians.
He said that in order to stay calm he would smoke 40 cigarettes a day.
“I make sure that I get at least two coffees in before I go to work and don’t run out of cigarettes throughout the day. That’s how I roll,” he said.
https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/australian-nick-parsons-killed-in-ukraine-while-clearing-mines/news-story/934c2f8ef8e983033b8c0da0eb4b2f75
https://www.prevailtogether.org/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d2Pcm5KXclQ
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73499
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23024217 (121019ZMAY25) Notable: Video: Remembering Virginia Giuffre: The woman who helped bring down Jeffrey Epstein - Virginia Giuffre's life was never easy. She had overcome extraordinary tragedy - sexual abuse as a child, homelessness and multiple sex-trafficking rings - to become a powerful advocate for sex abuse survivors around the world. To her lawyer and friend Sigrid McCawley, she was lion-hearted. "I think Virginia's legacy is something that we haven't seen before in our history," McCawley told 60 Minutes reporter Tara Brown. "She has left us with a feeling that irrespective of whether you're a president, a politician, a billionaire, or a prince, that you can be held accountable. You are not above the law." Giuffre's loss will be felt keenly by the survivors of sexual abuse she had always supported. And for those who knew and loved her, there is now an aching hole. "I used to say that we had broken through the lawyer-client line because she would sign her emails, 'I love you Siggy'," McCawley said. "She was just a dear person in my life. And I think that the world will not be the same without her. It just won't be." - 60 Minutes Australia
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73395
Remembering Virginia Giuffre: The woman who helped bring down Jeffrey Epstein
Sammi Taylor - 11 May 2025
Virginia Giuffre's life was never easy.
She had overcome extraordinary tragedy - sexual abuse as a child, homelessness and multiple sex-trafficking rings - to become a powerful advocate for sex abuse survivors around the world.
To her lawyer and friend Sigrid McCawley, she was lion-hearted.
"I think Virginia's legacy is something that we haven't seen before in our history," McCawley told 60 Minutes reporter Tara Brown.
"She has left us with a feeling that irrespective of whether you're a president, a politician, a billionaire, or a prince, that you can be held accountable. You are not above the law."
60 Minutes Australia first met both Giuffre and McCawley in 2019, when Virginia was in combat mode.
She was on a mission to bring to account some of the world's richest and most powerful people.
Her decision to be the first to forgo anonymity to also accuse billionaire Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell of sex abuse and sex trafficking changed the course of many lives.
Giuffre was just 16 when she was hired by Epstein and British socialite Maxwell in 2000 to be a private masseuse.
Giuffre said she was sexually abused by the pair before being trafficked to their powerful friends, including Prince Andrew - a claim he continues to deny, despite settling a civil suit with Giuffre in 2022 for an undisclosed sum.
"She put Epstein in prison. She put Maxwell in prison. She had Prince Andrew stripped of his titles," McCawley said.
"Her words, her actions were incredible. And they started a movement of change."
But on the evening of Anzac Day this year, police and family confirmed the shocking news that Giuffre had taken her own life.
For McCawley, the news was a shock.
"Overwhelming surprise and disbelief. True disbelief," she said.
"It took me several hours to even come to terms with the fact that that was real."
But Giuffre was clearly distressed in the last weeks of her life.
In a recent and confusing social media post, she claimed she was suffering renal failure after a car accident involving a school bus.
Disturbingly, she said she'd been given only four days to live.
Giuffre had also recently become estranged from her children, something McCawley said was devastating to her.
"I think that anybody who's a mother would feel and understand that being deprived access to your children has to be the worst thing that could ever happen to you," she said.
"So I think that while Virginia could face many demons in her life and many villains, that moment of deprivation I think was something that was more than she could handle."
Giuffre's loss will be felt keenly by the survivors of sexual abuse she had always supported.
And for those who knew and loved her, there is now an aching hole.
"I used to say that we had broken through the lawyer-client line because she would sign her emails, 'I love you Siggy'," McCawley said.
"She was just a dear person in my life. And I think that the world will not be the same without her. It just won't be."
If you or someone you know needs support, help is available 24/7.
Lifeline: Call 13 11 14, text 0477 13 11 14 or visit:
https://www.lifeline.org.au/
Beyond Blue: Call 1300 22 4636 or visit:
https://www.beyondblue.org.au/
1800RESPECT: Call 1800 737 732, text 0458 737 732 or visit:
https://1800respect.org.au/
https://9now.nine.com.au/60-minutes/virginia-giuffre-the-woman-who-helped-bring-down-jeffrey-epstein/d3893b22-c893-41e1-9c34-3fff7296c036
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_OHL_s7LRPg
—
Q Post #4923
Oct 21 2020 20:55:05 (EST)
https://twitter.com/VRSVirginia/status/1319071346282778624
Dearest Virginia -
We stand with you.
Now and always.
Find peace through prayer.
Never give up the good fight.
God bless you.
Q
https://qanon.pub/#4923
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73500
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23027894 (131028ZMAY25) Notable: High Court to decide if information gathered on encrypted messaging app AN0M was legally obtained - The High Court will on Tuesday delve into the murky world of organised crime and encrypted messaging on an app known as AN0M, which was secretly controlled by the FBI and the Australian Federal Police (AFP). The operation known as "Ironside" began in 2018, when phones with the app began to circulate among criminal elements, encouraged by people the police identified as "criminal influencers", who unwittingly recommended the devices. It appeared to be a secure way to send messages, except that every communication was being copied and forwarded to police. In 2021 there was a worldwide crackdown. The app had collected about 28 million messages, including 19 million relating to Australia. The Australian Criminal Intelligence Commission (ACIC) said there were nearly 1,000 arrests globally, with 42 tonnes of illicit drugs and $US58 million in cash and crypto currency seized. According to AFP data, there have been nearly 100 people in Australia charged, with drugs, firearms, and substantial amounts of money seized. The ACIC said at the time the operation "provided voluminous, invaluable intelligence and insight that has never been obtained before by Australian law enforcement". But now two South Australian men, who are alleged members of the Comancheros bikie group, want the High Court to find that information was not legally obtained. The two are charged with belonging to a criminal group and possession of prohibited firearms. Their lawyers will tell the High Court the evidence against them collected from AN0M should be inadmissible in their trial, because its collection breached The Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Act 1979. "The question is whether communications obtained covertly by the AN0M application were obtained as the result of an unlawful interception," their submissions to the court said.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
High Court to decide if information gathered on encrypted messaging app AN0M was legally obtained
Elizabeth Byrne - 13 May 2025
The High Court will on Tuesday delve into the murky world of organised crime and encrypted messaging on an app known as AN0M, which was secretly controlled by the FBI and the Australian Federal Police (AFP).
The operation known as "Ironside" began in 2018, when phones with the app began to circulate among criminal elements, encouraged by people the police identified as "criminal influencers", who unwittingly recommended the devices.
It appeared to be a secure way to send messages, except that every communication was being copied and forwarded to police.
In 2021 there was a worldwide crackdown.
The app had collected about 28 million messages, including 19 million relating to Australia.
The Australian Criminal Intelligence Commission (ACIC) said there were nearly 1,000 arrests globally, with 42 tonnes of illicit drugs and $US58 million in cash and crypto currency seized.
According to AFP data, there have been nearly 100 people in Australia charged, with drugs, firearms, and substantial amounts of money seized.
The ACIC said at the time the operation "provided voluminous, invaluable intelligence and insight that has never been obtained before by Australian law enforcement".
But now two South Australian men, who are alleged members of the Comancheros bikie group, want the High Court to find that information was not legally obtained.
The two are charged with belonging to a criminal group and possession of prohibited firearms.
Their lawyers will tell the High Court the evidence against them collected from AN0M should be inadmissible in their trial, because its collection breached The Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Act 1979.
"The question is whether communications obtained covertly by the AN0M application were obtained as the result of an unlawful interception," their submissions to the court said.
The pair have so far failed in two appeals against the use of the information, but were granted special leave to appeal by the High Court last year.
Soon afterwards the case took a new turn when the Commonwealth changed the law, to back up the use of the app by police.
On Tuesday the High Court will also consider if the new law is valid.
In their submissions the men's lawyers said it interferes with the exercise of judicial power guaranteed under the constitution.
"It is an invalid exercise of legislative power," submissions for the men said.
The lawyers will tell the High Court the new law undermines the institutional integrity of the courts, removing the "fact finding" function which is a hallmark of judicial power.
But the Commonwealth will tell the High Court the new law does not direct the courts to find any fact, and is valid under the constitution.
The Commonwealth also said in its submissions the new act made no difference to the interception laws.
"[The] Court of Appeal was correct to conclude that the AN0M evidence did not involve an interception in contravention … of the Interception Act," Commonwealth submissions said.
The attorneys-general for New South Wales, Western Australia and Victoria have intervened, along with the Director of Public Prosecutions for South Australia, which has applied to intervene in support of the Commonwealth.
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-05-13/act-operation-ironside-an0m-app-high-court-preview/105275242
https://qresear.ch/?q=an0m
https://qresear.ch/?q=anom
https://qresear.ch/?q=ironside
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73501
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23027918 (131036ZMAY25) Notable: Sussan Ley: ‘We lost the flag, but we’re ready for a new season’ - "If you are one of the millions of dedicated footy fans, if you have barracked for one of our incredible Olympians or if you have been in a stadium cheering on the mighty Tillies, you will know you can’t always be on the winning side. As a Sydney Swans supporter I know after the loss of a grand final, when you get towelled up you don’t give up. You don’t drop your team or your belief in it either. You get a bag of ice, you watch the tapes and you get to work rebuilding. You do the work to come back stronger and faster next season. As someone who has served as an MP for the Liberal Party for almost 25 years, I have experienced both success and defeat. Just days ago we were handed a big loss that we must accept with humility. Despite the result, the Liberal Party remains the most successful political party in Australian history. We have won more flags than any other team. Our party has, more than any other, helped shape Australia into the prosperous, strong and fair society it is today. But we have to face up to the fact that despite our best efforts, we have failed to connect with a changing electorate. Now more than ever, the federal Liberal Party must respect, reflect and represent modern Australia. As leader, I have committed to a full assessment of why we lost the election. The next steps for our party are focused on listening to the community and rebuilding our movement. But we will never shy away from our timeless values, which will always underpin our policy development processes. We are ready to do the work; we are up for it; we will take a good hard look at ourselves. Preseason is about to begin and I know my team is hungry to get to work." - Sussan Ley, Leader of the Opposition - theaustralian.com.au
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73455
>>73478
>>73494
'We have to have a fresh approach': Sussan Ley becomes first woman to lead Liberal Party after defeating Angus Taylor
Daniel Jeffrey - May 13, 2025
1/2
Sussan Ley has promised a fresh approach for the Liberals after defeating Angus Taylor to become the first woman to lead the party in its 81-year history.
Ley, the moderate candidate who was deputy under Peter Dutton for the last three years, narrowly saw off conservative shadow treasurer Taylor 29 votes to 25 in this morning's party room meeting.
"We have to have a Liberal Party that respects modern Australia, that reflects modern Australia, and that represents modern Australia," Ley said following her victory.
"And we have to meet the people where they are. And that's what I am committed to doing and what I am determined to do.
"I want to do things differently, and we have to have a fresh approach."
Ley will become not just the first woman to lead the Liberals, but also the first to be federal opposition leader – from either party – in Australian history.
Ted O'Brien, one of the most strident supporters of the Coalition's nuclear plan in his former role as shadow energy spokesperson, was elected her deputy.
He defeated surprise candidate Phil Thompson 38 votes to 16.
Jacinta Nampijinpa Price, who had made a controversial defection from the Nationals to the Liberal Party late last week to stand for the deputy leadership under Taylor, didn't officially nominate for the deputy position after Taylor had been defeated.
Price later said Taylor's defeat was the reason she didn't contest the position.
She congratulated Ley on her election and said she would work with her and O'Brien, but also admitted the decision wasn't what she wanted.
"While I am disappointed Angus Taylor was not elected leader, I respect the decision made by my colleagues within the party room today," Price said.
Taylor congratulated Ley on her election, saying "becoming the first woman to lead the Liberal Party is a milestone for Sussan and our party", before making a call for unity.
"The Liberal Party has suffered a historic defeat, and we have lost many good people in this election," he said.
"This result shows we must do more to convince Australians that the Coalition is the best party to support aspiration, economic opportunity, and the Australian dream... I will contribute the best way I can to help get us back in the fight."
Ley, in turn, praised Taylor as "an intelligent, talented contributor to so many ideas" and promised him an "integral" role in the opposition.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73502
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23032017 (140905ZMAY25) Notable: Australian Electoral Commission investigates after missing ballot papers found at election worker's home - Almost 2,000 ballot papers went missing on election night and were later recovered from the Sydney home of a temporary Australian Electoral Commission (AEC) worker, the ABC can reveal. While the AEC said the incident did not affect the result in the seat of Barton because the votes had already been counted, it has not explained how the ballots ended up at the worker's home and has launched an investigation. The AEC confirmed the worker collected a secure container holding 1,866 House of Representatives votes from a polling booth in the Sydney suburb of Hurstville after polls closed on May 3, but failed to deliver it to the commission's central counting centre. "Ballot papers were securely packaged in the presence of scrutineers with an authorised transport officer collecting two ballot paper transport containers for delivery to a central counting centre to await further processing," an AEC spokesperson said in a statement. "The staff member responsible erroneously returned one less container than was expected." Officials at the AEC only noticed the container was missing when they began a routine recount of votes in the electorate last week. "The AEC's tracking processes for ballot paper transport containers identified that one of the two transport containers for the Hurstville polling place was not returned to the central counting centre on election night as it should have been," the spokesperson said. The AEC recovered the container early last week. "This issue relates to a single transport container that remained sealed and intact and has not affected the election," the AEC said. "The uniquely coded security seals were not broken, and the AEC's purpose-built ballot paper transport container was intact. "All ballot papers are accounted for. The AEC takes ballot paper handling extremely seriously." The AEC was not able to provide details about where in the worker's home the container was found. "It was obtained from the individual's home where it was collected by permanent AEC staff," the spokesperson said. "The only specific detail I have regarding the collection is that it was obtained during a conversation outside the staff member's house, following identification of the custody of the container." The commission has launched an investigation into the matter but declined to say whether it had referred the incident to law enforcement agencies.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73455
AEC investigates after missing ballot papers found at election worker's home
Pat McGrath - 14 May 2025
Almost 2,000 ballot papers went missing on election night and were later recovered from the Sydney home of a temporary Australian Electoral Commission (AEC) worker, the ABC can reveal.
While the AEC said the incident did not affect the result in the seat of Barton because the votes had already been counted, it has not explained how the ballots ended up at the worker's home and has launched an investigation.
The AEC confirmed the worker collected a secure container holding 1,866 House of Representatives votes from a polling booth in the Sydney suburb of Hurstville after polls closed on May 3, but failed to deliver it to the commission's central counting centre.
"Ballot papers were securely packaged in the presence of scrutineers with an authorised transport officer collecting two ballot paper transport containers for delivery to a central counting centre to await further processing," an AEC spokesperson said in a statement.
"The staff member responsible erroneously returned one less container than was expected."
Error detected
Officials at the AEC only noticed the container was missing when they began a routine recount of votes in the electorate last week.
"The AEC's tracking processes for ballot paper transport containers identified that one of the two transport containers for the Hurstville polling place was not returned to the central counting centre on election night as it should have been," the spokesperson said.
The AEC recovered the container early last week.
"This issue relates to a single transport container that remained sealed and intact and has not affected the election," the AEC said.
"The uniquely coded security seals were not broken, and the AEC's purpose-built ballot paper transport container was intact.
"All ballot papers are accounted for.
"The AEC takes ballot paper handling extremely seriously."
Labor's Ash Ambihaipahar won the seat, beating Liberal Fiona Douskou with more than 60 per cent of the two-party-preferred vote.
The AEC was not able to provide details about where in the worker's home the container was found.
"It was obtained from the individual's home where it was collected by permanent AEC staff," the spokesperson said.
"The only specific detail I have regarding the collection is that it was obtained during a conversation outside the staff member's house, following identification of the custody of the container."
The commission has launched an investigation into the matter but declined to say whether it had referred the incident to law enforcement agencies.
Potential impact
University of Sydney electoral law expert Anne Twomey described the incident as a "serious matter".
"Although it had no effect upon the outcome of the election in this case, it could have resulted in the election being held void in that seat if the ballots had been destroyed," Professor Twomey said.
"While concerning, this case does remind us that there are many layers of protection built into the electoral system to ensure it is secure.
"The system ensured there was accountability, although it seems likely there was some kind of failure to identify immediately that the container had not been delivered to the counting centre."
In 2013, the AEC was forced to re-run Western Australia's senate election after 1,370 ballots went missing in what a parliamentary inquiry described as the "greatest failure in the history of the Australian Electoral Commission".
Professor Twomey said the latest incident was likely to prompt a fresh inquiry into the commission's transportation of ballot papers.
"The AEC will no doubt investigate this matter thoroughly and learn from the failure," she said.
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-05-14/aec-investigating-after-ballot-papers-missing-barton-sydney/105286812
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73503
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23032019 (140910ZMAY25) Notable: Sussan Ley reframes herself as supporter of Israel - Sussan Ley has lashed Anthony Albanese’s response to the Middle East conflict as a major threat to “social cohesion” and asserted her support for Israel, as she sought to distance herself from her past pro-Palestinian views. In her first public address as Opposition Leader, Ms Ley said while she was still a “steadfast friend” of Palestinians, and criticised their leaders for “letting them down”, she had changed her views on the conflict. Ms Ley, a former co-chair of the Parliamentary Friends of Palestine group, said she now saw the issues through a “different prism” after a trip to Israel, a move that has been praised by Jewish leaders. Ms Ley said in 2008 that Palestinians are “airbrushed out of existence”, but on Tuesday declared it was one of the “great privileges” of age that she could re-examine her views after the issue had been “thoroughly ventilated” with her colleagues. “Following my appointment as deputy, I took a trip at the invitation of Julian Leeser, an outstanding colleague and dear friend, to Israel,” Ms Ley said. “I spent a lot of time seeing what was happening on the ground. The impact of that trip and the changed geopolitical circumstances of the Abraham Accords, with Israel reaching out for peace to Saudi and Morocco, and then, of course, the hideous events of October 7 in Gaza, have changed my thinking on the entire subject.”
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73455
>>73501
Sussan Ley reframes herself as supporter of Israel
RHIANNON DOWN - 13 May 2025
Sussan Ley has lashed Anthony Albanese’s response to the Middle East conflict as a major threat to “social cohesion” and asserted her support for Israel, as she sought to distance herself from her past pro-Palestinian views.
In her first public address as Opposition Leader, Ms Ley said while she was still a “steadfast friend” of Palestinians, and criticised their leaders for “letting them down”, she had changed her views on the conflict.
Ms Ley, a former co-chair of the Parliamentary Friends of Palestine group, said she now saw the issues through a “different prism” after a trip to Israel, a move that has been praised by Jewish leaders.
Ms Ley said in 2008 that Palestinians are “airbrushed out of existence”, but on Tuesday declared it was one of the “great privileges” of age that she could re-examine her views after the issue had been “thoroughly ventilated” with her colleagues.
“Following my appointment as deputy, I took a trip at the invitation of Julian Leeser, an outstanding colleague and dear friend, to Israel,” Ms Ley said.
“I spent a lot of time seeing what was happening on the ground.
“The impact of that trip and the changed geopolitical circumstances of the Abraham Accords, with Israel reaching out for peace to Saudi and Morocco, and then, of course, the hideous events of October 7 in Gaza, have changed my thinking on the entire subject.”
The new Liberal leader took aim at the Prime Minister and Penny Wong for their response to the Israel-Hamas war and domestic anti-Semitism, vowing to “hold Labor to account” over the issues.
In her closing remarks, Ms Ley called out Mr Albanese for allowing a sense of “isolation, fear, and real concern” for Jewish Australians to pervade.
“One of the biggest threats to social cohesion in this country is the Prime Minister’s approach to Jewish Australians and everything that happens overseas,” she said.
“I’ve reflected on that, with the hideous events in Gaza, has domestic implications.
“We have a Foreign Minister, Penny Wong, who has let down Australia in the UN and we have a Prime Minister who is intent, it seems, on letting down Jewish Australians on the streets of our cities.”
Australia/Israel & Jewish Affairs Council executive director Colin Rubenstein said Ms Ley had become a “staunch friend” to the Jewish community in recent years.
“She participated in a study visit to Israel as part of AIJAC’s Rambam Israel Fellowship Program in 2022 and has been principled and informed in speaking out in support of Israel, especially during the current war with Hamas,” Dr Rubenstein said.
“She has consistently and constructively engaged with our community and listened to our concerns, and we look forward to working with her in her new role.”
Ms Ley did not name Hamas directly, but criticised the Palestinian leadership for not being “interested in peace with Israel”.
“It is not a party interested in a secure Israel behind secure borders, and it is not a party interested in a just and lasting peace,” she said.
Executive Council of Australian Jewry co-chief executive Peter Wertheim commended Ms Ley for re-examining her views.
“She is right when she says Israel currently has no partner for peace in Gaza,” he said.
“In the face of these realities Sussan Ley has rejected the reflexively antagonistic attitudes of Israel’s perennial critics. For this she deserves our respect.”
Zionist Federation of Australia president Jeremy Leibler said the Jewish community had a “strong and constructive” relationship with the Coalition.
“We look forward to continuing that under the new leadership of the Liberal Party, and working closely to ensure the Australia-Israel connection remains strong,” he said.
https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/sussan-ley-reframes-herself-as-supporter-of-israel/news-story/b5963028ea8d0b5d369ab91a993fc642
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73504
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23032025 (140919ZMAY25) Notable: Jacinta Price ‘chickened out’ of deputy vote, say infuriated and blindsided Angus Taylor backers - Senator Jacinta Nampijinpa Price shocked the allies who brought her into the Liberal Party when she did not put her hand up to run as deputy once her running mate, Angus Taylor, lost the leadership ballot against Sussan Ley. Price had not told anyone in Taylor’s camp that she would only run if Taylor won, prompting fellow conservative Phillip Thompson to nominate on the spur of the moment to fill the gap. The Northern Territory senator’s defection from the Nationals to the Liberals last week to run on Taylor’s ticket caused bad blood between the Coalition partners and alarmed Liberal moderates worried that the maverick politician did not have the experience for the role, having been in parliament for just three years. But senior Liberals, including Tony Abbott, engineered the move believing she would energise the party’s base. But in Tuesday’s meeting in Canberra, Price failed to put her hand up when nominations for the deputy position opened. Energy spokesman Ted O’Brien, who supported Ley as leader, immediately declared his candidacy for the deputy spot when nominations opened at 10.17am. Price, according to several MPs in the room, turned to look towards a section of the opposition party room where her Right faction allies, including Andrew Hastie and others, were seated. She shook her head, the MPs said, indicating she would not be running. Last-minute nominee Thompson, an up-and-coming 37-year-old from Townsville, lost the ballot to O’Brien by 38 votes to 16, but his conservative allies were relieved that he chose to create a contest and represent his Right faction. “She totally f*cked us,” one supporter of Taylor said of Price’s blindsiding.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73455
>>73501
>>73481
Jacinta Price ‘chickened out’ of deputy vote, say infuriated and blindsided Angus Taylor backers
Paul Sakkal - May 14, 2025
Senator Jacinta Nampijinpa Price shocked the allies who brought her into the Liberal Party when she did not put her hand up to run as deputy once her running mate, Angus Taylor, lost the leadership ballot against Sussan Ley.
Price had not told anyone in Taylor’s camp that she would only run if Taylor won, prompting fellow conservative Phillip Thompson to nominate on the spur of the moment to fill the gap.
The Northern Territory senator’s defection from the Nationals to the Liberals last week to run on Taylor’s ticket caused bad blood between the Coalition partners and alarmed Liberal moderates worried that the maverick politician did not have the experience for the role, having been in parliament for just three years. But senior Liberals, including Tony Abbott, engineered the move believing she would energise the party’s base.
But in Tuesday’s meeting in Canberra, Price failed to put her hand up when nominations for the deputy position opened. Energy spokesman Ted O’Brien, who supported Ley as leader, immediately declared his candidacy for the deputy spot when nominations opened at 10.17am.
Price, according to several MPs in the room, turned to look towards a section of the opposition party room where her Right faction allies, including Andrew Hastie and others, were seated. She shook her head, the MPs said, indicating she would not be running.
Last-minute nominee Thompson, an up-and-coming 37-year-old from Townsville, lost the ballot to O’Brien by 38 votes to 16, but his conservative allies were relieved that he chose to create a contest and represent his Right faction.
“She totally f*cked us,” one supporter of Taylor said of Price’s blindsiding.
Similar sentiment was expressed by six Taylor supporters to whom this masthead spoke in the hours after Ley – backed by Alex Hawke’s centre-right faction and party moderates – became the first woman to lead the party.
“There’s no other explanation other than that she chickened out. The Gus [Angus Taylor] vote was first and he lost. She knew she would have lost by a bigger margin, so she chickened out,” another MP said.
Some of Taylor’s conservative supporters in the Senate were unenthusiastic about the prospect of Price as deputy leader, as she could have leapfrogged them for higher-ranking Senate positions.
Thompson, who almost won his northern Queensland seat of Herbert on primary votes alone, said he knew he was unlikely to win when he unexpectedly threw his hat in the ring, but said he was a “firm believer that you have to be in the arena to have a shot”.
“As a proud and passionate North Queenslander, I made the decision to have a crack. While I didn’t get the outcome I had hoped for, I’ll never stop fighting for North Queensland,” he said, congratulating Ley and O’Brien and pledging his support.
“Democracy in action is a beautiful process and something for which I hold enormous respect, particularly having fought under the Australian flag to protect our democratic rights.”
Price compounded the frustration among her Liberal colleagues when she appeared on Sky News hours after she pulled out of the ballot and entertained a question about moving to the lower house to potentially become the prime minister one day.
“Well, there is that,” she said when asked by host Chris Kenny about becoming the prime minister. “I know there’s a lot of Australians who’d love to see that.”
Asked if the Liberal Party would unite behind Ley, Price’s endorsement was lukewarm. “Well, that is the hope,” she said. “I will be supporting the leadership because that is what we have to do if we want to do a good job in opposition.”
Taylor’s allies in the Right, according to several MPs, do not plan to destabilise Ley’s leadership in the short term. However, they are watching closely to see if Ley rewards the powerbrokers who secured her win – including Hawke and Andrew Bragg’s NSW moderates – to the exclusion of right-wingers.
Ley appeared alive to the risk of disunity when on Monday when she said: “My shadow cabinet will include people who did support me in this room this morning, and people who did not.”
https://www.smh.com.au/politics/federal/jacinta-price-chickened-out-of-deputy-vote-say-infuriated-and-blindsided-angus-taylor-backers-20250514-p5lz1n.html
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73505
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23032032 (140931ZMAY25) Notable: Andrew Hastie declares ‘desire to lead’ the Liberal Party - Andrew Hastie has declared his “desire to lead” the Liberal Party, revealed the de-industrialisation of Australia keeps him up at night and warned about the power of big tech and corporates in a podcast with a Labor-aligned think tank. In a 50-minute podcast recorded on Tuesday after Sussan Ley pipped Angus Taylor for the Liberal Party leadership, Mr Hastie outlined his vision to connect with younger voters and focus on the four enterprise institutions of family, the home, education and small business. Speaking on the Curtin’s Cast podcast with John Curtin Research Centre executive director Nick Dyrenfurth and RedBridge Group pollster Kos Samaras, the 42-year-old cited his young family and the pressures of commuting from Western Australia as reasons he decided not to run for leadership. In the immediate aftermath of the Coalition’s May 3 election bloodbath, the former Parliamentary Joint Committee on Intelligence and Security chair and Special Air Service regiment officer was touted for leadership by senior Liberal figures after he secured primary and two-party preferred swings in his outer-metropolitan Perth seat of Canning. While Liberal MPs in capital cities across the country lost their seats, Mr Hastie increased his margin. Mr Hastie, the son of a Presbyterian minister and public school teacher, who has three children with wife Ruth aged between three and nine, said he was focused on understanding the “problem that we’re facing as a party”. “Leadership is going to come in many forms over the next three years. Susan Ley has just made history as the first female leader of the Liberal Party. That’s a really important role,” Mr Hastie told the Curtin’s Cast podcast. “But leadership can’t be confined to just the position. We’ve also got to lead in the battle of ideas as well. And I think that’s where I want to make a contribution. I’d be foolish to say I don’t have a desire to lead. I do have a desire to lead. But the timing was all out for personal reasons. A really important thing in politics is to know where you stand. And I came to that conclusion very quickly.”
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73455
>>73501
Andrew Hastie declares ‘desire to lead’ the Liberal Party
GEOFF CHAMBERS - 14 May 2025
1/2
Andrew Hastie has declared his “desire to lead” the Liberal Party, revealed the de-industrialisation of Australia keeps him up at night and warned about the power of big tech and corporates in a podcast with a Labor-aligned think tank.
In a 50-minute podcast recorded on Tuesday after Sussan Ley pipped Angus Taylor for the Liberal Party leadership, Mr Hastie outlined his vision to connect with younger voters and focus on the four enterprise institutions of family, the home, education and small business.
Speaking on the Curtin’s Cast podcast with John Curtin Research Centre executive director Nick Dyrenfurth and RedBridge Group pollster Kos Samaras, the 42-year-old cited his young family and the pressures of commuting from Western Australia as reasons he decided not to run for leadership.
In the immediate aftermath of the Coalition’s May 3 election bloodbath, the former Parliamentary Joint Committee on Intelligence and Security chair and Special Air Service regiment officer was touted for leadership by senior Liberal figures after he secured primary and two-party preferred swings in his outer-metropolitan Perth seat of Canning. While Liberal MPs in capital cities across the country lost their seats, Mr Hastie increased his margin.
Mr Hastie, the son of a Presbyterian minister and public school teacher, who has three children with wife Ruth aged between three and nine, said he was focused on understanding the “problem that we’re facing as a party”.
“Leadership is going to come in many forms over the next three years. Susan Ley has just made history as the first female leader of the Liberal Party. That’s a really important role,” Mr Hastie told the Curtin’s Cast podcast.
“But leadership can’t be confined to just the position. We’ve also got to lead in the battle of ideas as well. And I think that’s where I want to make a contribution.
“I’d be foolish to say I don’t have a desire to lead. I do have a desire to lead. But the timing was all out for personal reasons. A really important thing in politics is to know where you stand. And I came to that conclusion very quickly.”
Ahead of Ms Ley finalising her frontbench next week, The Australian understands Mr Hastie is keen to step-up into a prominent role outside of the Defence portfolio he held under Peter Dutton.
Asked to identify the big policy challenge Australia must confront into the 2030s, Mr Hastie said “the thing that keeps me up at night is the de-industrialisation of Australia”.
“I worry that at some point we’ll be so dependent upon supply chains outside of this country that in a strategic crisis or a war, we’re completely cut off and alone and unable to feed our people, fuel our economy and maintain civic order,” he said.
“Because once the panic sets in, it’s very hard to arrest. That’s the thing that I really worry about, that with power prices surging, with a lot of our industry offshoring, with diminished business investment into advanced manufacturing in this country, we become a supplicant state and vulnerable to coercion.
“I would love to see the re-industrialisation of Australia so we can make stuff, so we can refine our own fuel, but also because, and I think this is what’s happening in the (United) States as well, there’s actually meaningful work.”
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73506
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23032040 (140943ZMAY25) Notable: ‘Swamp creature’ exit: Babet to quit politics after praising Kanye West’s Heil Hitler track, slamming ‘mentally ill’ left - United Australia Party senator Ralph Babet says he’ll quit politics in 2028 to avoid becoming a “swamp creature” - but not before unleashing a late-night tirade in which he endorsed Kanye West’s Heil Hitler track and said he’d rather associate with neo-Nazis than “mentally ill” left-wing Australians. The Victorian senator, who has a history of incendiary social media posts, told his followers in an Instagram story that the American rapper’s song Heil Hitler was his favourite of the week. “All I said was it was a good song, right?” Senator Babet said. “I like Kanye West. He’s a great artist … If someone else doesn’t like what he puts out, don’t buy it. Don’t listen to it. But don’t you f*cking dare tell me what I can and can’t listen to.” He rejected accusations of anti-Semitism and said attempts to label him a Nazi were “f*cking bullshit”. “If they’re going to try and associate me with being a Nazi - a brown immigrant from Africa – that’s f*cking bullshit. You know it. I know it,” he said. West, who also goes by the name “Ye”, became one of the most influential musicians of his generation, until he made no secret of his admiration for Adolf Hitler in a series of social media posts on Elon Musk’s X platform. The multi-award winning artist released a video for Heil Hitler on his X account last week and received more than 8½ million views from his 33 million loyal followers.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73455
‘Swamp creature’ exit: Babet to quit politics after praising Kanye West’s Heil Hitler track, slamming ‘mentally ill’ left
MOHAMMAD ALFARES - May 13, 2025
1/2
United Australia Party senator Ralph Babet says he’ll quit politics in 2028 to avoid becoming a “swamp creature” – but not before unleashing a late-night tirade in which he endorsed Kanye West’s Heil Hitler track and said he’d rather associate with neo-Nazis than “mentally ill” left-wing Australians.
The Victorian senator, who has a history of incendiary social media posts, told his followers in an Instagram story that the American rapper’s song Heil Hitler was his favourite of the week.
“All I said was it was a good song, right?” Senator Babet said.
“I like Kanye West. He’s a great artist … If someone else doesn’t like what he puts out, don’t buy it. Don’t listen to it. But don’t you f*cking dare tell me what I can and can’t listen to.”
He rejected accusations of anti-Semitism and said attempts to label him a Nazi were “f*cking bullshit”.
“If they’re going to try and associate me with being a Nazi – a brown immigrant from Africa – that’s f*cking bullshit. You know it. I know it,” he said.
West, who also goes by the name “Ye”, became one of the most influential musicians of his generation, until he made no secret of his admiration for Adolf Hitler in a series of social media posts on Elon Musk’s X platform.
The multi-award winning artist released a video for Heil Hitler on his X account last week and received more than 8½ million views from his 33 million loyal followers.
Senator Babet also defended a separate Instagram post in which he said he would “rather hang out” with members of the neo-Nazi National Socialist Network than with the “baby-killing, murdering, leftists”.
Asked to clarify the comment, he claimed it was made “tongue in cheek” but said he still stood by the sentiment. “There’s also truth to that,” he said. “Do you think I would want to hang out with baby-killing, murdering, leftists, absolute backwards, mentally ill, retarded, left-wing turds?”
In the same breath, he claimed he wouldn’t associate with the NSN either: “They want to f*cking deport me … because I’m brown. So obviously it’s tongue in cheek. I wouldn’t hang out with them, and they wouldn’t hang out with me, either.”
He went on to describe Australian progressive voters as “Greens voters that are mentally ill” and accused them of wanting to “tear down the family”, “do gender mutilating surgery on children” and “put kids on puberty blockers”.
When asked what he would say to Jewish Australians offended by his posts, Senator Babet refused to apologise. “I can listen to whatever music I like,” he said.
“If they want to be offended because Kanye West released a song, don’t download the song … But don’t tell me as a grown man what I can and can’t listen to.
“I think it’s a good song and I’m going to be buying his album. Does that make me a Nazi? No, I’m not a Nazi. I just like his music.”
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73507
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23032082 (141012ZMAY25) Notable: Video: Australian labourer Caleb List feared dead in Ukraine - A Queensland labourer who travelled to Ukraine three years ago to join the fight against Russia's invasion is feared to have been recently killed in battle, but authorities are yet to locate his remains. Sources in Ukraine have told the ABC that former Gladstone resident Caleb List, who signed up with Ukraine's armed forces in 2022, is believed to have died last month during heavy fighting in the Kharkiv region. In an interview in 2023 with German international public broadcaster Deutsche Welle (DW), the young Australian outlined his motivation for volunteering with Ukraine's Foreign Legion shortly after President Vladimir Putin launched the invasion. "I wanted to test myself; I wanted to join the French Foreign Legion, I wanted to push myself to the extreme - so I came here with the same motivation, and I've basically done that and now I just do this because it's the only thing I'm really good at," he told DW. A figure connected to Ukraine's Armed Forces has told the ABC Mr List is believed to have been killed by artillery fire in heavily contested territory near the city of Izyum late last month, but his remains have not yet been recovered by his unit. The Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade (DFAT) has declined to comment on the case, but in a statement, it reminded Australians that travel to Ukraine was considered extremely dangerous. "The Australian government has consistently advised Australians not to travel to Ukraine or Russia since Russia's full-scale invasion began in February 2022," a DFAT spokesperson told the ABC. Before travelling to Europe, Mr List worked as a trade assistant at Queensland's Yarwun refinery. While at school he joined the army cadets but his subsequent application to become an Australian soldier was rejected.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73498
Australian labourer Caleb List feared dead in Ukraine
Andrew Greene - 14 May 2025
A Queensland labourer who travelled to Ukraine three years ago to join the fight against Russia's invasion is feared to have been recently killed in battle, but authorities are yet to locate his remains.
Sources in Ukraine have told the ABC that former Gladstone resident Caleb List, who signed up with Ukraine's armed forces in 2022, is believed to have died last month during heavy fighting in the Kharkiv region.
In an interview in 2023 with German international public broadcaster Deutsche Welle (DW), the young Australian outlined his motivation for volunteering with Ukraine's Foreign Legion shortly after President Vladimir Putin launched the invasion.
"I wanted to test myself; I wanted to join the French Foreign Legion, I wanted to push myself to the extreme — so I came here with the same motivation, and I've basically done that and now I just do this because it's the only thing I'm really good at," he told DW.
During the interview, the soldier who was previously rejected by the Australian Army, described his experience serving alongside other international recruits in Ukraine's Foreign Legion.
"When you go to a Ukrainian unit you notice the whole place is clean, they have people who cook and just set up and it's nice so when you come off mission the place is nice, it's spotless," he said.
"With the [foreign] legion because they're new and new people, and because people leave and come back, they remake a lot of the mistakes — so the place is sometimes dirty, it's not as well organised, they'll leave stuff behind."
Feared dead
A figure connected to Ukraine's Armed Forces has told the ABC Mr List is believed to have been killed by artillery fire in heavily contested territory near the city of Izyum late last month, but his remains have not yet been recovered by his unit.
The Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade (DFAT) has declined to comment on the case, but in a statement, it reminded Australians that travel to Ukraine was considered extremely dangerous.
"The Australian government has consistently advised Australians not to travel to Ukraine or Russia since Russia's full-scale invasion began in February 2022," a DFAT spokesperson told the ABC.
Before travelling to Europe, Mr List worked as a trade assistant at Queensland's Yarwun refinery.
While at school he joined the army cadets but his subsequent application to become an Australian soldier was rejected.
This week the ABC confirmed former Australian soldier Nick Parsons was killed in Ukraine earlier this month while working for a charity organisation dedicated to removing land mines from the war-torn country.
On Monday, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese expressed his "deepest condolences and sympathies" to Mr Parsons' family, whom he did not name citing DFAT advice, while reminding Australians to follow official warnings and not travel to Ukraine.
Asked about Mr List on Wednesday, the PM said the report of his death was "deeply troubling" and again expressed best wishes to his family while repeating the warning.
"There is a travel warning in place for a reason. Australians should not be travelling to Ukraine. It is dangerous, and people should not follow that advice."
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-05-14/australian-tradie-caleb-list-feared-dead-in-ukraine/105288584
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73508
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23035918 (150914ZMAY25) Notable: Larissa Waters chosen as new Greens leader - Larissa Waters has been chosen as the new federal Greens leader, replacing Adam Bandt. The Greens held a party room meeting in Melbourne today to select a leader following the shock loss of Adam Bandt. The race was between Mehreen Faruqi, Sarah Hanson-Young and Senator Waters. A Greens source told the ABC the role was decided by "consensus". Senator Faruqi, who is from New South Wales, was chosen as deputy and Senator Hanson-Young, from South Australia, was chosen as manager of business in the Senate. "I feel so strengthened by the sentiment of the room and by this amazing team," Senator Waters told reporters after the meeting. "We've got a lot of work to do because people are really hurting and the planet is hurting, and we need a parliament that actually delivers for people and has the courage and the boldness and the heart to deliver some help to people." A disappointing election campaign saw the minor party lose three of its four seats in the lower house after a modest drop in its national share of the first preference vote. But the party will again exert significant influence in the Senate, where it has retained its 11 seats and is likely to be in the balance of power, meaning Labor could pass legislation with its support alone.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73455
>>73476
>>73483
Larissa Waters chosen as new Greens leader
Tom Crowley - 15 May 2025
Larissa Waters has been chosen as the new federal Greens leader, replacing Adam Bandt.
The Greens held a party room meeting in Melbourne today to select a leader following the shock loss of Adam Bandt.
The race was between Mehreen Faruqi, Sarah Hanson-Young and Senator Waters. A Greens source told the ABC the role was decided by "consensus".
Senator Faruqi, who is from New South Wales, was chosen as deputy and Senator Hanson-Young, from South Australia, was chosen as manager of business in the Senate.
"I feel so strengthened by the sentiment of the room and by this amazing team," Senator Waters told reporters after the meeting.
"We've got a lot of work to do because people are really hurting and the planet is hurting, and we need a parliament that actually delivers for people and has the courage and the boldness and the heart to deliver some help to people."
A disappointing election campaign saw the minor party lose three of its four seats in the lower house after a modest drop in its national share of the first preference vote.
But the party will again exert significant influence in the Senate, where it has retained its 11 seats and is likely to be in the balance of power, meaning Labor could pass legislation with its support alone.
'We'll be back', says Waters
Senator Waters paid tribute to Mr Bandt, calling him a "wonderful leader".
"We miss him desperately … We hope to welcome him back, I can't strong-arm him just yet, but I intend to. And we intend as a party to continue to grow."
She also signalled the party would not abandon the lower house even though it was now a "Senate-dominated team".
"The Greens are in the two-party preferred now in more seats than ever before. So folks, we'll be back."
Senator Waters was first elected as a senator for Queensland in 2010, making her the second longest-serving member of the Greens party room behind Senator Hanson-Young.
She was most recently the party's Senate leader and was also a co-deputy for several years, acting as spokesperson for several portfolios including women, democracy, and climate.
She will become the fifth person to lead the Greens in the federal parliament, following Bob Brown, Christine Milne, Richard Di Natale and Adam Bandt.
Nick McKim was chosen as Senate whip, and Penny Allman-Payne as deputy whip, defeating Dorinda Cox eight votes to four.
Senator Waters signalled a "firm but constructive" approach to dealing with the government in the next parliament: "People elected us to get sh*t done, and that's what we intend to do."
Senator Hanson-Young said there were "no more excuses for being timid. People are hurting, the planet is hurting … People expect this parliament to get things done."
Senator Faruqi said the Greens should demand "more, not less" from the party.
Asked about media reports that Lidia Thorpe was eyeing a return to the party she quit over her opposition to the Voice referendum, Senator Waters said the speculation was "concocted".
"I'm not sure she wants that."
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-05-15/larissa-waters-greens-leader/105296840
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73509
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23035926 (150920ZMAY25) Notable: Greens new leader Larissa Waters, deputy Mehreen Faruqi double down on Gaza - Newly elected Greens leader Larissa Waters and deputy Mehreen Faruqi insist the party will maintain its focus on the Gaza war, as both senators said they would continue to condemn “genocide” in the war-torn territory. The party’s 12 members spent almost two hours in a meeting on Thursday to decide the leadership structure after former leader Adam Bandt lost his Melbourne seat to Labor at the election on May 3. The Greens lost three of its four House of Representatives seats - including the stunning defeat of Bandt – at the poll, as its national primary vote flatlined and party elders called into question the Greens’ “hypermilitant” agenda and the way it communicates with Australian voters. But after the meeting to decide the leadership on Thursday, Waters and Faruqi warned the Albanese government that the minor party would not take a backward step, seeking to deliver an ultimatum to Labor about who it should work with in the Senate. “We will always be there calling out atrocities, calling out a genocide and standing strong on social justice and human rights,” Waters said. “The Labor Party have a choice. They can work with us … and help people and protect nature, or they can choose to work with the Coalition. They’re going to need to pick because they don’t have the numbers in the Senate to pass the legislation that they want to work on.”
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73508
Greens new leader Larissa Waters, deputy Mehreen Faruqi double down on Gaza
Olivia Ireland and Rachel Eddie - May 15, 2025
Newly elected Greens leader Larissa Waters and deputy Mehreen Faruqi insist the party will maintain its focus on the Gaza war, as both senators said they would continue to condemn “genocide” in the war-torn territory.
The party’s 12 members spent almost two hours in a meeting on Thursday to decide the leadership structure after former leader Adam Bandt lost his Melbourne seat to Labor at the election on May 3.
The Greens lost three of its four House of Representatives seats – including the stunning defeat of Bandt – at the poll, as its national primary vote flatlined and party elders called into question the Greens’ “hypermilitant” agenda and the way it communicates with Australian voters.
But after the meeting to decide the leadership on Thursday, Waters and Faruqi warned the Albanese government that the minor party would not take a backward step, seeking to deliver an ultimatum to Labor about who it should work with in the Senate.
Waters, Faruqi, and fellow Greens senators Sarah Hanson-Young, Nick McKim and Penny Allman-Payne walked with arms linked to the press conference, as Waters said she felt strengthened by the sentiment in the room and called for action on the climate crisis, housing and the Israel-Palestine conflict.
“We will always be there calling out atrocities, calling out a genocide and standing strong on social justice and human rights,” Waters said.
“The Labor Party have a choice. They can work with us … and help people and protect nature, or they can choose to work with the Coalition. They’re going to need to pick because they don’t have the numbers in the Senate to pass the legislation that they want to work on.”
Faruqi shared Waters’ views, arguing migrant and multicultural communities supported the party’s strong stand against “the genocide in Gaza”.
“To the right-wing media, to the billionaires, to the big corporations and to the Albanese government, this is our message: We are not going to take a step backwards,” she said.
“On climate, on the environment, on housing and for justice, for Palestine, our voters have put us there to fight for people and the planet, and that is exactly what we will be doing … this is a moment for demanding more, not less.”
Hanson-Young was considered to be a contender for the leadership positions, but said she decided not to contest because she believed the team elected was the best offering. She will continue in her role as Greens manager of business.
“This team provides stability. This team provides the skills and the grunt that we are going to need,” she said.
Waters was elected unopposed. Senator Dorinda Cox ran for deputy leader, but Faruqi won that vote of 9 to 3. McKim will hold the position of party whip and Allman-Payne will be party room chair and deputy whip.
Cox was the first party member to leave the meeting, appearing to be consoled by a Greens staff member.
The party standing by its agenda from the previous parliament goes against recommendations made by senior party figures last week after Bandt’s shock defeat and the loss of two other lower house MPs.
Co-founder of the national Greens Drew Hutton last week slammed the party for shifting focus from its environmental roots.
“The Greens have experimented with what I would call a hypermilitant approach during the last three years,” Hutton told this masthead last week.
“What will broaden their base is if they lose this terrible way they have of expressing their moral superiority over everyone else and their refusal to talk meaningfully with ordinary Australians.”
Ian Cohen, the first Greens member elected to the NSW parliament, urged the Greens to revive its focus on conservation, arguing “the environment must be a priority”.
Waters said she had nothing negative to say about Bandt, but would lead the party differently.
“I’m a different person to Adam, I’ll take a different approach,” she said.
“I lead a really strong team, and we are committed to delivering ... We will be firm but constructive under this government and any future government.”
A Queensland senator, Waters was first elected in 2010 and has been seen widely as a moderate voice in the party. She was co-deputy leader of the party from 2015 to 2022.
Before her time in parliament, Waters was a community environmental lawyer at the Environmental Defender’s Office in Queensland from 2002 to 2011.
https://www.smh.com.au/politics/federal/larissa-waters-elected-new-greens-leader-20250515-p5lzcc.html
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73510
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23035935 (150928ZMAY25) Notable: Australia PM Albanese meets Indonesia counterpart in first international visit since re-election - Australia's Prime Minister Anthony Albanese held talks with Indonesian President Prabowo Subianto on defence cooperation and global trade on Thursday, describing Jakarta as an "indispenable partner" on his first international visit since his re-election. Albanese, sworn into office on Tuesday after his centre-left Labor party won an increased majority in parliament, said his visit showed the priority Canberra placed on defence and economic ties with Jakarta. "Indonesia is an indispensable partner for Australia," he said in opening remarks, meeting with Prabowo and ministers at the Presidential Palace. He urged Prabowo to forge closer defence ties with Australia, after an agreement was struck last year covering maritime security, counter-terrorism and disaster response. "Security is built on the sovereignty of every nation and the rules that govern all nations," he said when the two leaders addressed the media after their meeting. Indonesia committed to completing the ratification of the defence agreement, Prabowo said. "We will continue discussing the opportunities to improve and increase cooperation in defence sector," he said. Trade and investment, food security, energy transition and critical minerals were also discussed, Prabowo said. "We also invite Australia to participate more in our economy. It is important to strengthen such cooperation amid global economy uncertainty," he added.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>51066 (pb)
>>73455
Australia PM Albanese meets Indonesia counterpart in first international visit since re-election
Ananda Teresia and Kirsty Needham - May 15, 2025
JAKARTA, May 15 (Reuters) - Australia's Prime Minister Anthony Albanese held talks with Indonesian President Prabowo Subianto on defence cooperation and global trade on Thursday, describing Jakarta as an "indispenable partner" on his first international visit since his re-election.
Albanese, sworn into office on Tuesday after his centre-left Labor party won an increased majority in parliament, said his visit showed the priority Canberra placed on defence and economic ties with Jakarta.
"Indonesia is an indispensable partner for Australia," he said in opening remarks, meeting with Prabowo and ministers at the Presidential Palace.
He urged Prabowo to forge closer defence ties with Australia, after an agreement was struck last year covering maritime security, counter-terrorism and disaster response.
"Security is built on the sovereignty of every nation and the rules that govern all nations," he said when the two leaders addressed the media after their meeting.
Indonesia committed to completing the ratification of the defence agreement, Prabowo said.
"We will continue discussing the opportunities to improve and increase cooperation in defence sector," he said.
Trade and investment, food security, energy transition and critical minerals were also discussed, Prabowo said.
"We also invite Australia to participate more in our economy. It is important to strengthen such cooperation amid global economy uncertainty," he added.
Australia wants to increase economic ties with Southeast Asia, as it seeks to diversify export markets to reduce reliance on China, and in response to trade uncertainty caused by U.S. President Donald Trump's tariffs.
Albanese was welcomed to the palace by dozens of soldiers on horseback, around 3,000 schoolchildren waving flags, and a military ceremony, according to the president's office.
Indonesia dismissed reports last month that Russia had requested to base military aircraft in the archipelago's easternmost province of Papua, about 1,200 km (750 miles) north of the Australian city of Darwin, where a U.S. Marine Corps rotational force is based for six months of the year.
"Indonesia's answer is no, they've made it very clear," Albanese told reporters earlier on Thursday when asked about the matter, which had drawn attention during Australia's election campaign.
Russia will try to increase its influence in the region and Australia is responding by building ties with neighbours including Indonesia, Albanese added.
Australian Strategic Policy Institute senior analyst for defence, Euan Graham, said the Australia-Indonesia relationship has "avoided serious crisis for more than a decade, cooperation continues to move forward incrementally and there is greater stability than before".
Yet wide differences remain, he added.
"Jakarta sees China and Russia as vectors of opportunity more than threats and views the U.S. and China primarily through the same lens of great power rivalry. That's largely at odds with Canberra's world view," Graham said.
Indonesia is projected to be the fifth largest economy in the world by the end of the next decade.
https://www.reuters.com/world/asia-pacific/australia-pm-albanese-meet-indonesia-counterpart-first-international-visit-since-2025-05-15/
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73511
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23035962 (150949ZMAY25) Notable: Prabowo’s warm words for Albanese are tinged by a Russian shadow - Prime Minister Anthony Albanese will back Indonesia’s inclusion in a free-trade deal that includes countries such as Japan, Canada and Mexico, in what would be a boost to the nation’s economy and further bolster its ties to Australia. In his first foreign visit since his May 3 election win, Albanese declared in Jakarta that he would support Indonesia’s bid to join the Trans-Pacific Partnership as well as the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Earlier, Albanese railed against Russia during a news conference before meeting with Prabowo, who visited Vladimir Putin at the Kremlin last year as president-elect. Their meeting comes weeks after respected military website Janes reported that Russia had lodged a formal request to base warplanes in Indonesia’s easternmost province, Papua, just 1400 kilometres from the Australian mainland - a report Indonesia’s Defence Minister Sjafrie Sjamsoeddin later denied. “Russia, of course, will try to increase its influence,” Albanese said, while dodging questions about what Moscow had or had not asked of Prabowo and the Indonesians. “We make very clear our position when it comes to Russia around the world - be it the brutal invasion of Ukraine, its interference in cybersecurity issues as well, its tolerance of criminal organisations that have been involved in that – are anathema to our values.”
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73510
Prabowo’s warm words for Albanese are tinged by a Russian shadow
Zach Hope - May 15, 2025
1/2
Prime Minister Anthony Albanese will back Indonesia’s inclusion in a free-trade deal that includes countries such as Japan, Canada and Mexico, in what would be a boost to the nation’s economy and further bolster its ties to Australia.
In his first foreign visit since his May 3 election win, Albanese declared in Jakarta that he would support Indonesia’s bid to join the Trans-Pacific Partnership as well as the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD).
“This is the fastest-growing region of the world in human history, and Indonesia is central to that growth,” he said, before Indonesian President Prabowo Subianto, a former special forces commander with a murky human rights record, personally drove him to a banquet on a golf buggy.
Earlier, Albanese railed against Russia during a news conference before meeting with Prabowo, who visited Vladimir Putin at the Kremlin last year as president-elect.
Their meeting comes weeks after respected military website Janes reported that Russia had lodged a formal request to base warplanes in Indonesia’s easternmost province, Papua, just 1400 kilometres from the Australian mainland – a report Indonesia’s Defence Minister Sjafrie Sjamsoeddin later denied.
“Russia, of course, will try to increase its influence,” Albanese said, while dodging questions about what Moscow had or had not asked of Prabowo and the Indonesians.
“We make very clear our position when it comes to Russia around the world – be it the brutal invasion of Ukraine, its interference in cybersecurity issues as well, its tolerance of criminal organisations that have been involved in that – are anathema to our values.”
Bound by geography
Albanese and Prabowo are both at the beginning of what will likely be a years-long co-existence inside an already-changed world and region, and geography and circumstance can be a powerful binder.
But while these vastly different men have some common interests and concerns – an unpredictable United States being just one – they diverge on others, including Indonesia’s ties with Russia.
Prabowo likes the proverb, “one thousand friends are too few, a single enemy is too many” – a clear expression of his country’s long tradition of not picking sides – and since his inauguration in October last year, Prabowo has taken this seriously, at least publicly.
His Kremlin visit last year came as Russia continued its invasion of Ukraine, and while he has also visited Australia and dozens of other countries, the newly elected leader of the world’s third-largest democracy cosying up to a warmongering dictator was uncomfortable viewing for many in the West.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73512
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23041388 (161258ZMAY25) Notable: Ben Roberts-Smith loses appeal over war crimes judgment - After a seven-year defamation fight and tens of millions of dollars in legal costs, former soldier Ben Roberts-Smith has failed in his bid to overturn a landmark decision that found he committed war crimes in Afghanistan. The former Special Air Service corporal launched a court challenge to his comprehensive loss against The Age and The Sydney Morning Herald after a marathon defamation trial that was billed as a test of public interest reporting and a quasi war crimes investigation. But the Full Court of the Federal Court - Justices Nye Perram, Anna Katzmann and Geoffrey Kennett – unanimously dismissed his appeal on Friday and ordered him to pay the newspapers’ costs. Roberts-Smith was not in court to hear the judgment being delivered. The ruling was touted by Nine, the publisher of The Age and the Herald, as an “emphatic win” for investigative journalism. In a 2023 decision, Federal Court Justice Anthony Besanko upheld the newspapers’ truth defence and found Roberts-Smith was complicit in the murder of four unarmed prisoners while deployed in Afghanistan between 2009 and 2012. The appeal court said in a summary of its decision that “we are unanimously of the opinion that the evidence was sufficiently cogent to support the findings that [Roberts-Smith] … murdered four Afghan men”. Besanko’s decision was made to the civil standard, on the balance of probabilities, rather than the higher criminal standard of beyond reasonable doubt. “I continue to maintain my innocence and deny these egregious spiteful allegations,” Roberts-Smith, a Victoria Cross recipient, said in a statement after the decision.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73424
>>73425
>>73442
Ben Roberts-Smith loses appeal over war crimes judgment
Michaela Whitbourn and Sarah McPhee - May 16, 2025
1/2
After a seven-year defamation fight and tens of millions of dollars in legal costs, former soldier Ben Roberts-Smith has failed in his bid to overturn a landmark decision that found he committed war crimes in Afghanistan.
The former Special Air Service corporal launched a court challenge to his comprehensive loss against The Age and The Sydney Morning Herald after a marathon defamation trial that was billed as a test of public interest reporting and a quasi war crimes investigation.
But the Full Court of the Federal Court – Justices Nye Perram, Anna Katzmann and Geoffrey Kennett – unanimously dismissed his appeal on Friday and ordered him to pay the newspapers’ costs. Roberts-Smith was not in court to hear the judgment being delivered.
The ruling was touted by Nine, the publisher of The Age and the Herald, as an “emphatic win” for investigative journalism.
In a 2023 decision, Federal Court Justice Anthony Besanko upheld the newspapers’ truth defence and found Roberts-Smith was complicit in the murder of four unarmed prisoners while deployed in Afghanistan between 2009 and 2012.
The appeal court said in a summary of its decision that “we are unanimously of the opinion that the evidence was sufficiently cogent to support the findings that [Roberts-Smith] … murdered four Afghan men”.
Besanko’s decision was made to the civil standard, on the balance of probabilities, rather than the higher criminal standard of beyond reasonable doubt.
“I continue to maintain my innocence and deny these egregious spiteful allegations,” Roberts-Smith, a Victoria Cross recipient, said in a statement after the decision.
“We will immediately seek to challenge this judgment in the High Court of Australia.”
The appeal hearing ran for 10 days in February last year – following a 110-day trial in 2021-22 and a 726-page judgment – and the parties had been awaiting the decision for more than a year.
The appeal court noted Besanko was “satisfied, contrary to [Roberts-Smith’s] ... account, that the people whose deaths he caused, procured or agreed to were protected by the laws of armed conflict”.
“In the course of his reasons, his Honour made numerous adverse findings about the credibility of [Roberts-Smith’s] ... evidence and that of witnesses called on his behalf who had testified that the killings were legitimate.
“In this appeal none of the adverse credit findings are challenged.”
Some of the appeal court’s reasons for its decision will not be made public because they contain national security information, but a portion of the judgment known as the open court reasons will be released within days.
“In order to give the Commonwealth two working days to examine the open court reasons to ensure there has been no inadvertent disclosure of national security information, the open court reasons will be impounded until 5pm next Tuesday,” Perram said.
The court made a non-publication order over the open court reasons “until either the Commonwealth notifies the court and the parties that it has no objection to publication … or 4pm on 20 May, 2025, whichever is earlier”.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73513
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23041418 (161306ZMAY25) Notable: The seven words that ended Ben Roberts-Smith’s $1.5m appeal bid - The dismissal of Ben Roberts-Smith’s defamation appeal was clinical in its execution. One by one, Federal Court Justice Nye Perram, on behalf of the full bench, brushed the disgraced soldier’s claims into a dustpan, and tipped them into the bin. Dozens of sleepless nights, thousands of hours of work, millions of dollars in costs. Lawyers estimate Roberts-Smith’s bid to overturn the court’s 2023 finding that he was a war criminal set both sides back a combined $4 million, coming on top of the $30 million spent on the original 110-day hearing. A late bid to re-open the appeal last month alone contributed $1.5 million to the total. Perram dispensed of it in seven words: “The application should be dismissed with costs.” Roberts-Smith released a statement outlining his intention to appeal to the High Court. “I continue to maintain my innocence and deny these egregious spiteful allegations,” he said.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73512
The seven words that ended Ben Roberts-Smith’s $1.5m appeal bid
Harriet Alexander - May 16, 2025
The dismissal of Ben Roberts-Smith’s defamation appeal was clinical in its execution.
One by one, Federal Court Justice Nye Perram, on behalf of the full bench, brushed the disgraced soldier’s claims into a dustpan, and tipped them into the bin.
Dozens of sleepless nights, thousands of hours of work, millions of dollars in costs.
Lawyers estimate Roberts-Smith’s bid to overturn the court’s 2023 finding that he was a war criminal set both sides back a combined $4 million, coming on top of the $30 million spent on the original 110-day hearing.
A late bid to re-open the appeal last month alone contributed $1.5 million to the total.
Perram dispensed of it in seven words: “The application should be dismissed with costs.”
This judgment was not preceded by the same white-knuckled wait as for the original judgment, when a heaving courtroom sweated over whether the quietly spoken Justice Anthony Besanko would be persuaded that the strength of the evidence met the gravity of the accusations.
Besanko could have been forgiven for dismissing even a strong suspicion that the decorated Afghanistan veteran was a war criminal. Much bolder to leap from private intuition to public certainty.
Then Roberts-Smith’s team had turned up to the judgment in force, from the loftiest barrister to the merest legal deckhand, matched on the other side of the court by Nine’s in-house and out-of-house lawyers, a silken team of barristers, a phalanx of editors and the two journalists at the centre of the case: Nick McKenzie and Chris Masters.
Only Roberts-Smith was nowhere to be seen.
This occasion was more drizzle than sizzle, and the attendees and absentees spoke volumes about their predictions on which way the Full Court of the Federal Court would rule.
Roberts-Smith again elected not to meet his fate; he is rumoured to be overseas. His lead barrister, Arthur Moses SC, was also conspicuous in his absence.
He sent in his place a junior barrister who nobody remembered attending any of the hearings, behind whom sat Roberts-Smith’s longstanding solicitor Monica Allen.
Nine sent a full team of lawyers, but no McKenzie, who had been wounded by the emergence of a secret recording of him claiming to Roberts-Smith’s ex-lover that he had access to the ex-soldier’s legal strategy.
Roberts-Smith’s lawyers argued that the recording was sufficient grounds to re-open the appeal, and for the first time in his 23-year career, McKenzie was subjected to cross-examination in court. His integrity, and that of Nine’s legal team who were accused of using improperly accessed material, was on the line.
But in dismissing the application, the Federal Court exposed the recording as a siren call.
Roberts-Smith had dared to hope that it would discredit his nemesis McKenzie, change the course of the litigation and lead to his redemption.
Instead, he was another million dollars worse off, and the evidence that he committed war crimes in Afghanistan did not budge. Not one jot.
Because the next words uttered by Perram were that it was the unanimous view of the full bench of the Federal Court that the whole appeal should be dismissed, and one side of the room seemed to swell.
As Perram left the bench, Minter Ellison solicitor Peter Bartlett, who has been handling the matter for The Age, the Sydney Morning Herald and the Canberra Times since its inception, emitted small noises of relief. Some of the lawyers were in tears. They milled and hugged.
Roberts-Smith’s lawyers gave tight smiles and left the building.
Each of the four murders that Besanko held to have occurred in his original judgment remained intact. And so did the integrity of McKenzie, whose evidence was found to obtain no significant contradictions or implausibilities.
Roberts-Smith released a statement outlining his intention to appeal to the High Court.
“I continue to maintain my innocence and deny these egregious spiteful allegations,” he said.
Two winters have passed since the Federal Court found that on the balance of probabilities, Roberts-Smith was a murderer and a war criminal.
The folk who sleep in the St James train tunnels not 100 metres from where Masters and McKenzie stood on the steps of the court and claimed vindication have swapped out their sleeping bags for pop-up tents.
McKenzie has moved on to stories of corruption elsewhere. Nicholas Owens SC, who fought the original case for the newspapers, has been appointed a judge.
Roberts-Smith is still shaking his fist at the sky.
https://www.theage.com.au/national/the-seven-words-that-ended-ben-robert-smith-s-1-5m-appeal-bid-20250516-p5lzqh.html
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73514
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23045675 (171242ZMAY25) Notable: Australia steps up bid for Pope Leo visit as PM visits Rome for inauguration - Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has met Catholic Church leaders in Rome ahead of the inauguration mass for Pope Leo XIV, joining them at a sanctuary church that welcomes visiting Australians. Albanese met Sydney Archbishop Anthony Fisher and Melbourne Archbishop Peter Comensoli at the church centre, which also houses Australians who have come to Rome for the mass. The church, called the Sanctuary of our Lady of Pompeii, has a connection with Pope Leo because he was elected by cardinals on May 8, the feast day for Our Lady of the Rosary of Pompeii. Albanese spoke briefly in the church’s rose garden, known as Domus Australia, about the importance of the inauguration mass for Australia’s 5 million Catholics. Earlier, the nation’s top diplomat at the Vatican, Keith Pitt, was stepping up attempts to bring Pope Leo to Australia in the first papal visit in two decades, in a key message ahead of the inauguration Mass on Sunday to confirm the new pope in office. The Australian ambassador-designate to the Holy See, also a former cabinet minister, Pitt was making the formal invitation one of the major priorities for the embassy as the new papacy begins. In an interview ahead of the inauguration Mass, Pitt named issues ranging from climate change, artificial intelligence and child sexual abuse as areas where the Australian government would seek to work with the new pope. He said Australia also wanted to work with Pope Leo and the Vatican on helping Pacific Island nations, a region with large numbers of Catholics.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73485
>>73486
Australia steps up bid for Pope Leo visit as PM visits Rome for inauguration
David Crowe - May 17, 2025
1/2
Rome: Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has met Catholic Church leaders in Rome ahead of the inauguration mass for Pope Leo XIV, joining them at a sanctuary church that welcomes visiting Australians.
Albanese met Sydney Archbishop Anthony Fisher and Melbourne Archbishop Peter Comensoli at the church centre, which also houses Australians who have come to Rome for the mass.
The church, called the Sanctuary of our Lady of Pompeii, has a connection with Pope Leo because he was elected by cardinals on May 8, the feast day for Our Lady of the Rosary of Pompeii.
Albanese spoke briefly in the church’s rose garden, known as Domus Australia, about the importance of the inauguration mass for Australia’s 5 million Catholics.
Earlier, the nation’s top diplomat at the Vatican, Keith Pitt, was stepping up attempts to bring Pope Leo to Australia in the first papal visit in two decades, in a key message ahead of the inauguration Mass on Sunday to confirm the new pope in office.
The Australian ambassador-designate to the Holy See, also a former cabinet minister, Pitt was making the formal invitation one of the major priorities for the embassy as the new papacy begins.
In an interview ahead of the inauguration Mass, Pitt named issues ranging from climate change, artificial intelligence and child sexual abuse as areas where the Australian government would seek to work with the new pope.
He said Australia also wanted to work with Pope Leo and the Vatican on helping Pacific Island nations, a region with large numbers of Catholics.
“Part of the role of the embassy is to elevate, in the minds of those decision makers in the Vatican, why it’s so important that Pope Leo comes to Australia,” Pitt said.
“I think that this is a unique opportunity.
“So we’ll take every opportunity to continue to put forward that invitation and highlight why it’s important for the more than 5 million Catholics in Australia.”
Australia will host a global Catholic event, the International Eucharistic Congress, in Sydney in 2028, and church leaders hope Pope Leo will attend.
Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said on May 9, hours after Pope Leo was elected by a conclave of the College of Cardinals, that he would invite the Pope to visit Australia for the congress.
Pitt is expected to have an audience with the Pope when he presents his diplomatic credentials to the Vatican, the formal step in being recognised as an ambassador to the small but highly influential state. Pitt resigned as a Nationals MP after 12 years in federal parliament when Albanese named him to the diplomatic post in February. He takes up a position role previously held by Tim Fischer, the former Nationals leader.
Pitt said his priority was to act on the prime minister’s invitation and make the case for the papal visit.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73515
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23045726 (171307ZMAY25) Notable: Video: Wong, Albanese attack ‘sham’ 13-year Russian prison sentence for Oscar Jenkins - Foreign Minister Penny Wong says the Albanese government is appalled by the 13-year sentence in a Russian maximum-security prison handed to Australian Oscar Jenkins after he was convicted of fighting as a mercenary alongside Ukrainian forces. The 33-year-old from Melbourne, captured in December last year while serving in Ukraine’s military, was found guilty by a court in the Russian-controlled Luhansk region of eastern Ukraine. Russian authorities claimed Jenkins, a former biology teacher in China, was paid up to 800,000 rubles ($15,000) a month to participate in military operations against their troops in Ukraine. State-run media claimed he had “fully admitted his guilt”. Wong condemned the outcome, saying: “The Australian government is appalled at the sham trial and 13-year sentence given to Australian man Oscar Jenkins. “As a full-serving member of the regular armed forces of Ukraine, Mr Jenkins is a prisoner of war. The Australian government has made clear to Russia that Mr Jenkins must be given the protections afforded to him as a prisoner of war. Russia is obligated to treat him in accordance with international humanitarian law, including humane treatment.” Wong’s comments were echoed hours later by Prime Minister Anthony Albanese. “Let’s be very clear. This sentence by Russia is an outrage - it is a continuation of the way they have behaved, abrogating their responsibilities,” he said, speaking to reporters in Rome. “This conflict began with them choosing to invade a sovereign nation, and their decision to abrogate their responsibility to uphold international law.”
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>51078 (pb)
>>51079 (pb)
Wong, Albanese attack ‘sham’ 13-year Russian prison sentence for Oscar Jenkins
Rob Harris - May 17, 2025
1/2
Foreign Minister Penny Wong says the Albanese government is appalled by the 13-year sentence in a Russian maximum-security prison handed to Australian Oscar Jenkins after he was convicted of fighting as a mercenary alongside Ukrainian forces.
The 33-year-old from Melbourne, captured in December last year while serving in Ukraine’s military, was found guilty by a court in the Russian-controlled Luhansk region of eastern Ukraine.
Russian authorities claimed Jenkins, a former biology teacher in China, was paid up to 800,000 rubles ($15,000) a month to participate in military operations against their troops in Ukraine. State-run media claimed he had “fully admitted his guilt”.
Wong condemned the outcome, saying: “The Australian government is appalled at the sham trial and 13-year sentence given to Australian man Oscar Jenkins.
“As a full-serving member of the regular armed forces of Ukraine, Mr Jenkins is a prisoner of war.
“The Australian government has made clear to Russia that Mr Jenkins must be given the protections afforded to him as a prisoner of war. Russia is obligated to treat him in accordance with international humanitarian law, including humane treatment.”
Wong’s comments were echoed hours later by Prime Minister Anthony Albanese.
“Let’s be very clear. This sentence by Russia is an outrage – it is a continuation of the way they have behaved, abrogating their responsibilities,” he said, speaking to reporters in Rome.
“This conflict began with them choosing to invade a sovereign nation, and their decision to abrogate their responsibility to uphold international law. We don’t believe this is a legitimate decision – [it is] by a legal process in Russia that is very politicised, as we know.”
Opposition home affairs spokesman James Paterson also labelled Jenkins’ sentence a “sham”, saying his treatment had been an “egregious” breach of international law.
Paterson said Jenkins was entitled to protections as a prisoner of war and said he hoped he was set free as part of a prisoner release exchange between Russia and Ukraine.
Jenkins, who was formally charged with mercenary activity in April, was shown in images and a video released by the prosecutor’s office standing in a glass cage, his hands behind his back and his expression despondent.
The court ruling, delivered on Friday, classified Jenkins’ actions as mercenary activity, meaning he was not entitled to prisoner-of-war protections under international law. He was ordered to be transferred to “a strict regime penal colony”. It is unknown whether he was provided with legal representation; such hearings have previously been referred to as “sham trials”.
Prosecutors claimed Jenkins arrived in Ukraine in February last year at the Ternopil recruiting centre, in western Ukraine, where, after training, he received uniforms, weapons and ammunition.
He was then sent to serve in the village of Shchurove in the Kramatorsk district.
They alleged he then fought against Russian forces in the Donbas region with the 402nd Separate Rifle Battalion, part of the 66th Separate Mechanised Brigade of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, until his capture near Makiyivka. The Kremlin maintains that foreign fighters in Ukraine are mercenaries, subject to criminal prosecution rather than the protections afforded to prisoners of war under the Geneva Convention.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73516
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23049366 (180852ZMAY25) Notable: Video: Albanese to meet Zelenskyy amid moves to secure release of Jenkins - Prime Minister Anthony Albanese is expected to meet Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in Rome in the wake of the Inauguration Mass for Pope Leo XIV, as the government intensifies its efforts to free Australian man Oscar Jenkins from a Russian jail. Jenkins was captured in December last year after fighting for Ukraine, and earlier this week he was sentenced to 13 years in a Russian "penal colony" for fighting as a mercenary in the conflict. Mr Albanese slammed that decision as an "outrage" and called the legal process in Russia "very politicised" and invalid. He also said Russia was abrogating its responsibilities under international law because it had declared Jenkins a mercenary rather than an enemy combatant, which would impose additional obligations on Moscow. "It is a continuation of the way that they have behaved, abrogating their international responsibilities," he said. "This conflict began with them choosing to invade a sovereign nation and to abrogate their responsibility to uphold international law." The prime minister is expected to discuss Jenkins with the Ukraine president when they sit down on the sidelines of the massive gathering in Rome. Some analysts have speculated Australia might try to secure his freedom as part of a broader prisoner swap deal between Russia and Ukraine. Both countries made an in-principle agreement to swap 1,000 prisoners during a meeting held in Türkiye this week, although the two countries remain far apart on the fundamental issues that would underpin a deal.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73515
Albanese to meet Zelenskyy amid moves to secure release of Jenkins
Stephen Dziedzic - 18 May 2025
Prime Minister Anthony Albanese is expected to meet Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in Rome in the wake of the Inauguration Mass for Pope Leo XIV, as the government intensifies its efforts to free Australian man Oscar Jenkins from a Russian jail.
Jenkins was captured in December last year after fighting for Ukraine, and earlier this week he was sentenced to 13 years in a Russian "penal colony" for fighting as a mercenary in the conflict.
Mr Albanese slammed that decision as an "outrage" and called the legal process in Russia "very politicised" and invalid.
He also said Russia was abrogating its responsibilities under international law because it had declared Jenkins a mercenary rather than an enemy combatant, which would impose additional obligations on Moscow.
"It is a continuation of the way that they have behaved, abrogating their international responsibilities," he said.
"This conflict began with them choosing to invade a sovereign nation and to abrogate their responsibility to uphold international law."
The prime minister is expected to discuss Jenkins with the Ukraine president when they sit down on the sidelines of the massive gathering in Rome.
Prisoner swap talks
Some analysts have speculated Australia might try to secure his freedom as part of a broader prisoner swap deal between Russia and Ukraine.
Both countries made an in-principle agreement to swap 1,000 prisoners during a meeting held in Türkiye this week, although the two countries remain far apart on the fundamental issues that would underpin a deal.
Any prisoner swap involving Jenkins might also be complicated by Russia's decision to declare him a mercenary rather than a prisoner of war.
Mr Albanese told journalists on Saturday that the meeting with Mr Zelenskyy was not yet locked in because both countries were still trying to lock in the final details around timing.
The two men are among multiple world leaders at the Papal Inauguration who are trying to juggle meetings on the sidelines of the historic event.
Australia has backed the peace negotiations between Russia and Ukraine, but Mr Albanese has said repeatedly that any peace pact must respect Kyiv's interests.
Mr Jenkins was captured late last year while serving under Ukraine's military in the Donbas region, and was filmed being slapped in a video shared online.
The government has repeatedly called for him to be freed by Russia.
Earlier this week, Foreign Minister Penny Wong said she was "appalled" by the "sham trial" and sentence handed to Jenkins.
"We continue to hold serious concerns for Mr Jenkins," she said.
"We are working with Ukraine and other partners, including the International Committee of the Red Cross, to advocate for his welfare and release."
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-05-18/albanese-and-zelenskyy-meet-in-rome-oscar-jenkins-sentence/105306076
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ieCzcUx3Bjw
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73517
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23053614 (190931ZMAY25) Notable: Sussan Ley: ‘We lost the flag, but we’re ready for a new season’ - "If you are one of the millions of dedicated footy fans, if you have barracked for one of our incredible Olympians or if you have been in a stadium cheering on the mighty Tillies, you will know you can’t always be on the winning side. As a Sydney Swans supporter I know after the loss of a grand final, when you get towelled up you don’t give up. You don’t drop your team or your belief in it either. You get a bag of ice, you watch the tapes and you get to work rebuilding. You do the work to come back stronger and faster next season. As someone who has served as an MP for the Liberal Party for almost 25 years, I have experienced both success and defeat. Just days ago we were handed a big loss that we must accept with humility. Despite the result, the Liberal Party remains the most successful political party in Australian history. We have won more flags than any other team. Our party has, more than any other, helped shape Australia into the prosperous, strong and fair society it is today. But we have to face up to the fact that despite our best efforts, we have failed to connect with a changing electorate. Now more than ever, the federal Liberal Party must respect, reflect and represent modern Australia. As leader, I have committed to a full assessment of why we lost the election. The next steps for our party are focused on listening to the community and rebuilding our movement. But we will never shy away from our timeless values, which will always underpin our policy development processes. We are ready to do the work; we are up for it; we will take a good hard look at ourselves. Preseason is about to begin and I know my team is hungry to get to work." - Sussan Ley, Leader of the Opposition - theaustralian.com.au
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73455
>>73501
Sussan Ley: ‘We lost the flag, but we’re ready for a new season’
Sussan Ley - 18 May 2025
1/2
If you are one of the millions of dedicated footy fans, if you have barracked for one of our incredible Olympians or if you have been in a stadium cheering on the mighty Tillies, you will know you can’t always be on the winning side.
As a Sydney Swans supporter I know after the loss of a grand final, when you get towelled up you don’t give up.
You don’t drop your team or your belief in it either. You get a bag of ice, you watch the tapes and you get to work rebuilding. You do the work to come back stronger and faster next season.
As someone who has served as an MP for the Liberal Party for almost 25 years, I have experienced both success and defeat. Just days ago we were handed a big loss that we must accept with humility.
Despite the result, the Liberal Party remains the most successful political party in Australian history. We have won more flags than any other team.
Our party has, more than any other, helped shape Australia into the prosperous, strong and fair society it is today.
But we have to face up to the fact that despite our best efforts, we have failed to connect with a changing electorate.
We have lost the trust of women and we have not convinced younger Australians that we have a plan to provide a fair go for their generation. We need to focus on renewing the compact we have had with Australians who live in cities, helping them deal with a rapidly changing economy and rising prices.
We have work to do. The reality is in recent elections we have failed to meet the expectations of the Australian community. We have to show the nurses, small business owners, tradies, teachers, farmers, parents and retirees, who ask for little but contribute a lot, that we understand their aspirations.
Australians sent a clear message at the election. We must listen, change and develop a fresh approach. To take a term from footy, we need to look at our system.
We need to understand what sort of team we are, and we need to come up with a new agenda to take to the Australian people.
Now more than ever, the federal Liberal Party must respect, reflect and represent modern Australia.
There is enormous talent in my partyroom. One of our biggest strengths is the different backgrounds my team members have and the different life experiences that have shaped them.
A diversity of opinions is not, as many commentators would have you think, a sign of weakness. My team cares about the future of our party because it knows we have the right values to keep Australians strong and secure.
As leader, I have committed to a full assessment of why we lost the election.
Properly understanding the causes of our defeat helps us determine the direction in which we must head.
I am optimistic we can rebuild and regain the trust of Australians because our party has been here before.
Following the loss of the Fraser government we commissioned the Valder Report. “Facing the Facts” was a comprehensive review that drew on views across our great party and the community. It set us on a course through a difficult period for our party.
We need to ensure our response to this recent defeat is equally comprehensive and consultative. But as we work out why we failed to win the flag at this election, and decide the path forward, there are things I can make clear are not going to change.
Our policies are up for review. But our values are not.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73518
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23053629 (190942ZMAY25) Notable: Pope Leo vows not to be an autocrat, receives the ring of office - The faithful came in their thousands to see Pope Leo XIV begin his work as one of the world’s most powerful spiritual leaders, in a ceremony that combined ancient symbols and modern statecraft. Joining the faithful were national leaders, who networked before the Mass in their places at the front of the inauguration, proving the diplomatic reach of the Vatican. US Vice President J.D. Vance and Secretary of State Marco Rubio sat in the same area as Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, European Union President Ursula von der Leyen and Prince Edward, representing King Charles. Zelensky and Vance shook hands - more than two months after the US vice president berated the Ukrainian president in the White House. Behind the scenes at the Mass, Rubio has spoken of the Vatican as a possible third party to host peace talks between Russia and Ukraine, highlighting the potential for the new Pope to become a trusted broker between states. The informal talks before the Mass gave Prime Minister Anthony Albanese time to speak with Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney and others. He met the Pope soon after the Mass, shaking hands briefly along with other leaders within the Vatican. Albanese was due to meet Zelensky and von der Leyen in separate talks after the Mass, as the ceremony gives way to an informal leadership gathering in Rome.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73485
>>73486
>>73514
Pope Leo vows not to be an autocrat, receives the ring of office
David Crowe - May 18, 2025
1/2
Vatican City: The faithful came in their thousands to see Pope Leo XIV begin his work as one of the world’s most powerful spiritual leaders, in a ceremony that combined ancient symbols and modern statecraft.
Waiting since dawn, patiently and sometimes joyfully, onlookers crowded into the square where Robert Prevost, son of a school superintendent and a librarian, was elevated to the papacy to lead 1.4 billion Catholics worldwide.
Deepest of all the symbolism was Pope Leo’s visit to a tomb before the inauguration Mass to venerate the bones of St Peter – the bishop of Rome almost two millennia ago.
The crowds began taking their seats in the square soon after dawn, on a warm morning in Rome under blue skies.
Joining the faithful were national leaders, who networked before the Mass in their places at the front of the inauguration, proving the diplomatic reach of the Vatican.
US Vice President J.D. Vance and Secretary of State Marco Rubio sat in the same area as Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, European Union President Ursula von der Leyen and Prince Edward, representing King Charles.
Zelensky and Vance shook hands – more than two months after the US vice president berated the Ukrainian president in the White House.
Behind the scenes at the Mass, Rubio has spoken of the Vatican as a possible third party to host peace talks between Russia and Ukraine, highlighting the potential for the new Pope to become a trusted broker between states.
The informal talks before the Mass gave Prime Minister Anthony Albanese time to speak with Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney and others.
He met the Pope soon after the Mass, shaking hands briefly along with other leaders within the Vatican.
Albanese was due to meet Zelensky and von der Leyen in separate talks after the Mass, as the ceremony gives way to an informal leadership gathering in Rome.
The Vatican said the Pope would meet with Zelensky the same afternoon.
The pontiff took his first Popemobile ride through St Peter’s Square ahead of the Mass, waving from the back of the all-electric, open-back Mercedes truck to the crowd that waved flags and cheered “Viva il Papa!”
The bells of St Peter’s Basilica tolled as Pope Leo waved from the back of the truck, which looped slowly through the square. The crowd cheered, with some waving Peruvian, American and Holy See flags – in recognition that the Pope, born in Chicago, had served as a bishop in Peru for more than two decades.
While the funeral Mass for Pope Francis was a sombre ceremony on April 26, the inauguration of Leo began as a celebration for a new and – by all signs – popular Pope. Worshippers from around the world sang, waved national flags and mingled while they waited for the service to begin.
The Mass filled St Peter’s Square, which has a capacity of about 80,000 people, and the crowd spilt into the streets beyond. The Vatican estimated 150,000 gathered for the Mass.
In a homily broadcast around the world, Pope Leo criticised the global economic system and said it “exploits the Earth’s resources and marginalises the poorest”.
He emphasised love as the mission of the church, contrasting this with trying to capture others by force, religious propaganda or power.
He said he would govern “without ever yielding to the temptation to be an autocrat” and acknowledged the decision by the College of Cardinals to choose him to lead the church.
“I was chosen, without any merit of my own, and now, with fear and trembling, I come to you as a brother,” he said.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73519
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23053647 (190951ZMAY25) Notable: Video: Another Catholic in the crowd: Anthony Albanese joins thousands at Pope Leo XIV’s inauguration - In a sea of world leaders and ecstatic Catholics waiting for the era of Leo XIV to officially begin, Anthony Albanese stood out as much as any cardinal or nun in his Akubra. A Prime Minister at the height of his powers was among hundreds of dignitaries in Rome on Sunday, as he waited for the new Pope’s inauguration mass alongside the likes of JD Vance, Giorgia Meloni, new German chancellor Friedrich Merz and Prince Edward standing in for the King. Mr Albanese started his time in the Holy See with Australian bishops admiring the masterpieces and the godliness of a church that has stood for thousands of years. And he was due to end the day firmly in the present with meetings with Europe’s top official, Ursula von der Leyen, and Ukrainian leader Volodymyr Zelensky scheduled. But for a few moments, Mr Albanese was just another Catholic in the crowd watching the first American pope take his place in a 2000-year-old story. “When Pope Leo gave his address after his election, he spoke about peace and justice in the world,” Mr Albanese said ahead of the mass. “And following on from what I think was an extraordinary role that Pope Francis played in sending out that message of justice and looking after the vulnerable and the poor … is important in today’s world, where we have so much turbulence and people are looking for some constancy, and they’re looking for higher values and a belief, that is important.”
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73485
>>73486
>>73514
Another Catholic in the crowd: Anthony Albanese joins thousands at Pope Leo XIV’s inauguration
LYDIA LYNCH - 19 May 2025
1/2
In a sea of world leaders and ecstatic Catholics waiting for the era of Leo XIV to officially begin, Anthony Albanese stood out as much as any cardinal or nun in his Akubra.
A Prime Minister at the height of his powers was among hundreds of dignitaries in Rome on Sunday, as he waited for the new Pope’s inauguration mass alongside the likes of JD Vance, Giorgia Meloni, new German chancellor Friedrich Merz and Prince Edward standing in for the King.
Mr Albanese started his time in the Holy See with Australian bishops admiring the masterpieces and the godliness of a church that has stood for thousands of years.
And he was due to end the day firmly in the present with meetings with Europe’s top official, Ursula von der Leyen, and Ukrainian leader Volodymyr Zelensky scheduled.
But for a few moments, Mr Albanese was just another Catholic in the crowd watching the first American pope take his place in a 2000-year-old story.
“When Pope Leo gave his address after his election, he spoke about peace and justice in the world,” Mr Albanese said ahead of the mass. “And following on from what I think was an extraordinary role that Pope Francis played in sending out that message of justice and looking after the vulnerable and the poor … is important in today’s world, where we have so much turbulence and people are looking for some constancy, and they’re looking for higher values and a belief, that is important.”
Wearing a plain white cassock and a beaming smile, Pope Leo glided through St Peter’s Square in an electric, open-topped popemobile before he was inaugurated as leader of the globe’s 1.4 billion Catholics.
Ahead of a ceremony soaked in ancient pomp and ritual, the 69-year-old thrilled crowds of faithful with his debut tour of the square with waves, stopping his procession to bless a baby.
Hundreds of thousands of gleeful pilgrims thronged the Vatican’s cobbled surrounds on Sunday to witness a new chapter in the history of the world’s oldest and largest church begin.
Thousands of police officers – including sharpshooters on the rooftops and bomb disposal squads on the ground – guarded a ceremony that was full of the world’s leaders.
Leo, born in Chicago in 1955 and elected the 267th pontiff in a secret conclave last week, has been a lifelong servant of the poor.
Like his predecessor, Pope Francis, he opted for simple attire for his lap of St Peter’s Square before changing into golden vestments for his inaugural public mass.
Crowds had begun gathering since dawn to secure prime position in the sun-soaked piazza, hoping to get close to the new Pope, who holds citizenship from both the United States and Peru.
The day contained special meaning for American Josefina Atamiranda who is studying theology at the Angelicum in Rome – the same university where Pope Leo received his doctorate in canon law.
“It is a blessing to be able to be here for this historic moment. It is a once-in-a-lifetime moment,” she told The Australian from the centre of St Peter’s Square.
“There are hundreds of thousands of people here but somehow it feels like home.”
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73520
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23053666 (191000ZMAY25) Notable: Video: Europe seeks defence pact with Australia as tanks head to Ukraine - The European Union is seeking a defence pact with Australia to deepen military co-operation in a move that highlights fears of a sharp increase in global instability. The EU put the proposal to Prime Minister Anthony Albanese in Rome on Sunday in the hope of matching other defence partnerships that have cleared the way for closer intelligence work and joint exercises. European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen revealed the idea in talks with Albanese after the inaugural Mass for Pope Leo XIV at the Vatican, saying it could add to European military ties with South Korea and Japan. The sharper focus on military ties with Europe is part of a wider debate about global security after US President Donald Trump took office in January and began threatening allies such as Canada. Von der Leyen did not name Trump in her public remarks with Albanese, but she declared that the security outlook had grown worse since she spoke to the prime minister at a summit in Brazil in November. “The geopolitical tensions have massively increased,” she said before the private talks began. “The good thing is, Australia and Europe are reliable partners. We’re predictable. We share the same values. And this is the reason also that we do not only see you as a trading partner, but we see you as a strategic partner, and we would very much like to broaden this strategic partnership.”
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73518
Europe seeks defence pact with Australia as tanks head to Ukraine
David Crowe - May 19, 2025
1/2
Rome: The European Union is seeking a defence pact with Australia to deepen military co-operation in a move that highlights fears of a sharp increase in global instability.
The EU put the proposal to Prime Minister Anthony Albanese in Rome on Sunday in the hope of matching other defence partnerships that have cleared the way for closer intelligence work and joint exercises.
European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen revealed the idea in talks with Albanese after the inaugural Mass for Pope Leo XIV at the Vatican, saying it could add to European military ties with South Korea and Japan.
The move came as Albanese met Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and pledged continued Australian support against Russia, including the delivery of Abrams tanks promised last October.
Amid concerns the tanks were taking too long to arrive, the Ukrainian president’s office said Albanese had assured them the tanks were “already on their way” to help the war effort.
The sharper focus on military ties with Europe is part of a wider debate about global security after US President Donald Trump took office in January and began threatening allies such as Canada.
Von der Leyen did not name Trump in her public remarks with Albanese, but she declared that the security outlook had grown worse since she spoke to the prime minister at a summit in Brazil in November.
“The geopolitical tensions have massively increased,” she said before the private talks began.
“The good thing is, Australia and Europe are reliable partners. We’re predictable. We share the same values.
“And this is the reason also that we do not only see you as a trading partner, but we see you as a strategic partner, and we would very much like to broaden this strategic partnership.
“For example, we have signed security and defence agreements with South Korea and with Japan, soon with the UK. We would be very pleased if we could develop such a security and defence partnership too, just to broaden the strategic partnership.”
The EU signed a defence partnership with South Korea in November to set up joint talks on security and intelligence, clear the way for military exercises, respect sea borders and work together on cybersecurity.
While the agreement did not name any adversaries, it focused on risks that have been aired in the past in relation to Russia and China, such as cybersecurity.
Albanese expressed caution about the EU suggestion when speaking to reporters after his meeting with von der Leyen, but he was open about the prospect of closer defence ties.
“We said that we were certainly interested in any further engagement of support, but it’s very early stages at this point,” he said.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73521
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23053676 (191007ZMAY25) Notable: Video: Europe eyes defence pact with Australia - Prime Minister Anthony Albanese held separate talks with EU president Ursula von der Leyen and Ukraine’s Volodymyr Zelensky on the sidelines of Pope Leo XIV’s inauguration mass on Sunday, assuring Mr Zelensky Australian tanks were on their way, as Russia’s brutal and ongoing invasion dominated discussions. At his meeting with the Ukrainian president, Mr Albanese pledged Australia’s continuing support for Kyiv’s fight against Russia and told Mr Zelensky that the promised M1A1 Abrams tanks were “on their way at the moment”. In April it was revealed that forty-nine Australian Army tanks promised to Ukraine six months ago were yet to leave the country. Mr Albanese also raised the fate of Melbourne man Oscar Jenkins, who was on Friday sentenced to 13 years in a Russian colony after being captured fighting for Ukraine. But he would not be drawn on whether he had asked Mr Zelensky to push for Mr Jenkins’s release in any future prisoner swap. “What we did was … in a diplomatic way, seek Ukraine’s further support for Oscar Jenkins,” he said. Mr Zelensky, who also met with US Vice President JD Vance in Rome and was expected to speak with Donald Trump by phone on Monday, thanked Mr Albanese for “the news of the tanks” and called for more economic sanctions against Russia. “Together we can really move this situation closer to peace with pressure on Russia and we are very thankful for sanctions,” he said. “I want to raise with you also this topic, which is very important, put more pressure, more sanctions on Russia.”
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73518
>>73520
Europe eyes defence pact with Australia
LYDIA LYNCH - 19 May 2025
The European Union is seeking to clinch a new defence pact with Australia to “broaden” strategic ties amid growing geopolitical upheaval, with Anthony Albanese advising talks were in “very early stages”.
The Prime Minister held separate talks with EU president Ursula von der Leyen and Ukraine’s Volodymyr Zelensky on the sidelines of Pope Leo XIV’s inauguration mass on Sunday, assuring Mr Zelensky Australian tanks were on their way, as Russia’s brutal and ongoing invasion dominated discussions.
Hailing a “new era” for Australia and Europe, Ms von der Leyen revealed the EU was eager increase military cooperation with the Albanese government through a new defence agreement, similar to those the bloc has inked with South Korea and Japan, which boosted co-operation on maritime and cyber security.
As she cited increased global tensions, Ms von der Leyen said Australia and Europe were reliable, predictable partners who could “offer to each other stability”.
“And this is the reason also that we do not only see you as a trading partner, but we see you as a strategic partner, and we would very much like to broaden this strategic partnership,” she told Mr Albanese.
“For example, we have signed security and defence agreements with South Korea and with Japan, soon with the UK. We would be very pleased if we could develop such a security and defence partnership too, just to broaden the strategic partnership in many topics that we have in common.”
Speaking to journalists after the talks, Mr Albanese signalled Australia was open to “further engagement”, but noted it already had a “range of defence relationships” with European countries and was a partner of NATO’s so-called Indo-Pacific Four, along with Japan, the Republic of Korea and New Zealand.
Asked if Ms von der Leyen was seeking to tighten Australia’s defence efforts with NATO, Mr Albanese said: “This was just a suggestion that Ursula von der Leyen raised”.
“There was no detail further, just it was really an assertion of Europe’s values being consistent with Australia’s values and in what ways could be explored further defence co-operation,” he added.
The pair also revived preliminary talks on a free-trade agreement after negotiations stalled in 2023, though Mr Albanese was unable say whether an agreement would be struck during this term of government.
“Our objective is to support an expansion of free and fair trade … and we will wait and see,” he said.
“We have indicated in the past, though, that we won’t sign up to agreements that aren’t in Australia’s national interest.”
‘Thank you for news of the tanks’
At his meeting with the Ukrainian president, Mr Albanese pledged Australia’s continuing support for Kyiv’s fight against Russia and told Mr Zelensky that the promised M1A1 Abrams tanks were “on their way at the moment”.
In April it was revealed that forty-nine Australian Army tanks promised to Ukraine six months ago were yet to leave the country.
Mr Albanese also raised the fate of Melbourne man Oscar Jenkins, who was on Friday sentenced to 13 years in a Russian colony after being captured fighting for Ukraine.
But he would not be drawn on whether he had asked Mr Zelensky to push for Mr Jenkins’s release in any future prisoner swap.
“What we did was … in a diplomatic way, seek Ukraine’s further support for Oscar Jenkins,” he said.
Mr Zelensky, who also met with US Vice President JD Vance in Rome and was expected to speak with Donald Trump by phone on Monday, thanked Mr Albanese for “the news of the tanks” and called for more economic sanctions against Russia.
“Together we can really move this situation closer to peace with pressure on Russia and we are very thankful for sanctions,” he said.
“I want to raise with you also this topic, which is very important, put more pressure, more sanctions on Russia.”
Australia has already imposed 1400 sanctions against Russian companies and individuals, Mr Albanese said later, adding Australia would “continue to look at whatever we can do to place pressure on Russia”.
Mr Albanese did not meet with Mr Vance who also attended Sunday’s mass.
“He arrived quite late in terms of just prior to the mass taking place, as you will have seen,” he said adding that no formal meeting had been sought either.
“I’m the Prime Minister, I meet the President of the United States, and that will occur at an appropriate time.”
https://www.theaustralian.com.au/world/europe-eyes-defence-pact-with-australia/news-story/1e9b5bf51f012bc5dfee7ca4e6c70c0d
https://x.com/AlboMP/status/1924118168861286703
https://x.com/ZelenskyyUa/status/1924133485754613832
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73522
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23053683 (191016ZMAY25) Notable: The haunting plight of Oscar Jenkins: ‘It’s just cold. I don’t like the cold’ - In a dimly lit video posted quietly to YouTube, Oscar Jenkins sits slouched and unshaven, his bruised face drawn with fatigue. His speech is slow and fragmented, as if he is assembling thoughts under the weight of something unspoken. The unverified video, posted in March, is the first of Jenkins speaking at length seen outside the war zone since his capture by Russian forces in Ukraine. What emerges is not the voice of a hardened mercenary, as Russian prosecutors would later allege, but that of a conflicted man swept up in a war he barely understands. “Personally, I don’t want to be in Ukraine … I don’t know Ukrainian culture,” the 33-year-old former Melbourne Grammar School student tells a person off-camera, who appears to be one of his captors. “I don’t know Ukrainian people very well. It’s just cold. I don’t like the cold … However, if there is a just war, maybe it is this Ukraine war, on the Ukraine side.” Jenkins’ murky rationale is hardly the call to arms of a political zealot. “I’m not very political,” he says, admitting much of his knowledge of the conflict was gleaned from Wikipedia. This masthead has not been able to verify when, where or the circumstances in which the heavily edited, 11-minute video was made. Jenkins’ reflections veer between history, geopolitics and personal discomfort. He references the shared culture of Russia and Ukraine, and makes vague assertions about land and liberty. “I think they want resources and land,” Jenkins says. “I think Putin maybe, I don’t know him, is interested in also having more land for Russia, maybe the USSR he has dreams of.” Then comes a moment of unexpected clarity: “I don’t want a world where people kill each other. I would rather have a world where there’s all peace, security, freedom. The best, the best world.”
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73515
>>73516
‘It’s just cold. I don’t like the cold’: The haunting plight of Oscar Jenkins
Rob Harris - May 19, 2025
1/2
London: In a dimly lit video posted quietly to YouTube, Oscar Jenkins sits slouched and unshaven, his bruised face drawn with fatigue.
His speech is slow and fragmented, as if he is assembling thoughts under the weight of something unspoken. The unverified video, posted in March, is the first of Jenkins speaking at length seen outside the war zone since his capture by Russian forces in Ukraine.
What emerges is not the voice of a hardened mercenary, as Russian prosecutors would later allege, but that of a conflicted man swept up in a war he barely understands.
“Personally, I don’t want to be in Ukraine ... I don’t know Ukrainian culture,” the 33-year-old former Melbourne Grammar School student tells a person off-camera, who appears to be one of his captors.
“I don’t know Ukrainian people very well. It’s just cold. I don’t like the cold ... However, if there is a just war, maybe it is this Ukraine war, on the Ukraine side.”
Jenkins’ murky rationale is hardly the call to arms of a political zealot. “I’m not very political,” he says, admitting much of his knowledge of the conflict was gleaned from Wikipedia.
This masthead has not been able to verify when, where or the circumstances in which the heavily edited, 11-minute video was made.
Jenkins’ reflections veer between history, geopolitics and personal discomfort. He references the shared culture of Russia and Ukraine, and makes vague assertions about land and liberty. “I think they want resources and land,” Jenkins says. “I think Putin maybe, I don’t know him, is interested in also having more land for Russia, maybe the USSR he has dreams of.”
Then comes a moment of unexpected clarity: “I don’t want a world where people kill each other. I would rather have a world where there’s all peace, security, freedom. The best, the best world.”
Captured in the eastern town of Makiivka in December, Jenkins was at first paraded on social media and then, just as quickly, disappeared. False rumours of his death circulated until, in February, he again appeared on pro-Russian Telegram accounts with a broken arm in a proof-of-life video.
He was formally charged with fighting as a mercenary in April and put on trial by a Russian-backed court in the occupied Luhansk region. On Friday, he was sentenced to 13 years in a maximum-security penal colony.
During the hearing, he stood behind glass in jeans and a striped jumper, his voice flat and apologetic.
“I feel sorry that I participated in a potentially violent way,” he said, his comments sounding rehearsed. “I am not a Ukrainian nationalist, my ideas are more global. I hope everyone in the world can have peace without war.”
British fighter Shaun Pinner, who spent months in Russian captivity, warned that such performances were choreographed. “They break you first,” he told this masthead last month. “And then they parade you.”
Pinner, who fought with Ukraine’s marines and, in 2022, was sentenced to death by a separatist court in Donetsk before being returned to the United Kingdom in a prisoner swap, has since spoken publicly about the conditions inside Russian captivity – physical abuse, mock executions, starvation. His testimony casts a long shadow over Jenkins’ case, fuelling concerns that the Australian could face a similar fate, or worse.
In Canberra, Foreign Minister Penny Wong called Jenkins’ trial “a sham” and said the Australian, having served in Ukraine’s regular armed forces, must be afforded prisoner-of-war protections under the Geneva Conventions.
“Russia is obligated to treat him in accordance with international humanitarian law, including humane treatment,” she said.
Prime Minister Anthony Albanese echoed those concerns, calling the sentence “an outrage” and “a continuation of the way they have behaved, abrogating their responsibilities”.
But Russia does not recognise foreign fighters in Ukraine as lawful combatants. Instead, it categorises them as criminals or paid mercenaries – a stance that strips them of POW protections and makes them pawns in a wider geopolitical game. Moscow claimed Jenkins was paid up to 800,000 roubles ($15,000) a month and arrived via a recruiting centre in Ternopil, in western Ukraine. From there, he was sent east, where he served with the 66th Separate Mechanised Brigade in the Donbas.
Jenkins’ account offers a bleaker, less heroic picture of service in the name of justice.
“Most of my work has been digging defensive position [sic]. Digging position,” he says in the video. “If the Russians come, you push back, you shoot for the drones. But I haven’t really done much of that.”
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73523
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23058406 (200949ZMAY25) Notable: Video: Nationals call it quits on decades-long coalition with Liberals - The Nationals will split from the Liberal Party after days of negotiations between the two sides failed to result in a coalition agreement, breaking with a century-long tradition. Nationals leader David Littleproud made the announcement at Parliament House on Tuesday, describing it as one of the "hardest political decisions of his life". He told reporters the Nationals would continue to work constructively with the Liberal Party but they would not re-enter into a formal coalition agreement at this stage. "The National Party will sit alone on a principle basis," Mr Littleproud said. "On the basis of looking forward, not having to look back, and to try and actually regain important policy pieces that change the lives of the people we represent." Emboldened by an election result that saw the minor party retain nearly all of its lower house seats while the Liberal Party went backwards, Nationals MPs had previously flagged that the arrangement was up for discussion. The sticking points for the minor party were the continuation of a nuclear power policy, the Regional Australia Future Fund, and the desire for divestiture powers for supermarkets. Hours after the Nationals announcement, a disappointed Ms Ley said the minor party had sought commitments on specific policies during negotiations. "I proposed that we stand up a joint shadow ministry consisting of Liberal Party shadow ministers and National Party shadow ministers," she said. "And that we then work separately on policies, as we should, in our separate party rooms and come together articulating what those policies are at the right time. The Nationals did not agree to that approach." The Liberals also argued the Nationals would not explicitly agree to traditional shadow cabinet solidarity, which obliges frontbenchers to back Coalition policies. But Ms Ley said she remained a "committed coalitionist" and that her door was open to restarting negotiations, but added that a fully Liberal frontbench would be unveiled later this week.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73455
>>73501
Nationals call it quits on decades-long coalition with Liberals
Maani Truu - 20 May 2025
1/2
The Nationals will split from the Liberal Party after days of negotiations between the two sides failed to result in a coalition agreement, breaking with a century-long tradition.
Nationals leader David Littleproud made the announcement at Parliament House on Tuesday, describing it as one of the "hardest political decisions of his life".
He told reporters the Nationals would continue to work constructively with the Liberal Party but they would not re-enter into a formal coalition agreement at this stage.
"The National Party will sit alone on a principle basis," Mr Littleproud said.
"On the basis of looking forward, not having to look back, and to try and actually regain important policy pieces that change the lives of the people we represent."
Emboldened by an election result that saw the minor party retain nearly all of its lower house seats while the Liberal Party went backwards, Nationals MPs had previously flagged that the arrangement was up for discussion.
Mr Littleproud travelled to Albury last week to meet with newly elected Liberal leader Sussan Ley, who was at home to be with her dying mother.
The sticking points for the minor party were the continuation of a nuclear power policy, the Regional Australia Future Fund, and the desire for divestiture powers for supermarkets.
One of the Coalition's key policies going into the election was a plan to build nuclear power reactors on seven sites around the country to supplement the energy transition.
But after the devastating May 3 election loss, which saw the Coalition reduced to just over 40 seats in the House of Representatives, Liberals' views on the policy were mixed.
Some wanted the nuclear power policy ditched, others wanted it retained but with less taxpayer money involved, and some wanted to double down.
Hours after the Nationals announcement, a disappointed Ms Ley said the minor party had sought commitments on specific policies during negotiations.
"I proposed that we stand up a joint shadow ministry consisting of Liberal Party shadow ministers and National Party shadow ministers," she said.
"And that we then work separately on policies, as we should, in our separate party rooms and come together articulating what those policies are at the right time.
"The Nationals did not agree to that approach."
The Liberals also argued the Nationals would not explicitly agree to traditional shadow cabinet solidarity, which obliges frontbenchers to back Coalition policies.
But Ms Ley said she remained a "committed coalitionist" and that her door was open to restarting negotiations, but added that a fully Liberal frontbench would be unveiled later this week.
"The shadow ministers that I appoint from [the Liberal] party room will be well equipped and incredibly capable to take the fight up to Labor right up until the next election," she said.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73524
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23058411 (200954ZMAY25) Notable: Video: ‘Door remains open’ says Sussan Ley amidst shock Coalition split following federal election disaster - Nuclear energy has blown up a political agreement between the Nationals and the Liberals after leaders failed to reach common ground but left the door open for a reconciliation. The traditional political marriage couldn’t be consecrated following a disastrous result for the Coalition at the federal election with the Nationals standing firm on wanting to retain four key policies. These included remaining committed to nuclear energy, divestiture powers to break up big supermarkets, a $20 billion investment fund that would disperse $1 billion a year on regional infrastructure and universal phone services. Landlines and payphones must have service no matter where they are in Australia but this doesn’t extend to mobile phones, which the Nationals have been fighting to include. Nationals Leader David Littleproud said the party didn’t want to have to re-prosecute the case to retain the policies it fought for under the previous agreement in opposition. “It’s on a principled position of making sure that those hard-fought wins are maintained and respected and we continue to look forward,” Littleproud told reporters in Canberra on Tuesday. Opposition Leader Sussan Ley addressed the media in the afternoon, emphasising her commitment to the Coalition despite the recent split. “I really believe that the Coalition is stronger together, I am a committed Coalitionist,” she said. “I do pay tribute to my Liberal Party colleagues in this room now and their intention to work constructively for the future with new and different policies, but never stepping away from our timeless values. Our policies may change, our values never will. But we need to give that process due diligence and I, as leader, want to harness the real initiative, interest, talent and the smarts of so many.”
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73455
>>73501
>>73523
‘Door remains open’ says Sussan Ley amidst shock Coalition split following federal election disaster
Liberal sources say the National party gave Ley less than an hour’s notice of their decision.
Dominic Giannini - 20 May 2025
Nuclear energy has blown up a political agreement between the Nationals and the Liberals after leaders failed to reach common ground but left the door open for a reconciliation.
The traditional political marriage couldn’t be consecrated following a disastrous result for the Coalition at the federal election with the Nationals standing firm on wanting to retain four key policies.
These included remaining committed to nuclear energy, divestiture powers to break up big supermarkets, a $20 billion investment fund that would disperse $1 billion a year on regional infrastructure and universal phone services.
Landlines and payphones must have service no matter where they are in Australia but this doesn’t extend to mobile phones, which the Nationals have been fighting to include.
Nationals Leader David Littleproud said the party didn’t want to have to re-prosecute the case to retain the policies it fought for under the previous agreement in opposition.
“It’s on a principled position of making sure that those hard-fought wins are maintained and respected and we continue to look forward,” Littleproud told reporters in Canberra on Tuesday.
Opposition Leader Sussan Ley addressed the media in the afternoon, emphasising her commitment to the Coalition despite the recent split.
“I really believe that the Coalition is stronger together, I am a committed Coalitionist,” she said.
“I do pay tribute to my Liberal Party colleagues in this room now and their intention to work constructively for the future with new and different policies, but never stepping away from our timeless values.
“Our policies may change, our values never will. But we need to give that process due diligence and I, as leader, want to harness the real initiative, interest, talent and the smarts of so many.”
Ley also acknowledged there were significant roadblocks to a unified Coalition.
“Shadow cabinet solidarity is very important and unless I, as leader of the Liberals, could be sure about that, it was important that we didn’t take those next steps,” she said.
“As I’ve said, I wasn’t assured of that with issues that may divide both members of their party room and members of our party room in the future.”
“The Liberal party’s door remains open to the Nationals’ should they wish to rejoin the coalition before the next election.”
Liberal sources say the National party gave Ley less than an hour’s notice of their decision.
The change in opposition doesn’t have a substantial impact on the government’s ability to pass legislation with Labor commanding a major majority in the lower house and only needing the Greens in the Senate.
The Liberals still have the numbers to pass legislation in the Senate with Labor without the Nationals.
Without a Coalition agreement, Labor has a significant electoral advantage with the Liberals holding fewer than 30 of 150 lower house seats and the Nationals, 15.
The Nationals won’t sit in shadow cabinet, meaning they won’t hold sway over policies and the half-dozen MPs who were around the table will take a pay cut.
The Coalition last broke up in 1987 for about four months.
Littleproud left the door open for a future arrangement, saying the two parties would still work together to fight the Labor government.
Opposition Leader Sussan Ley faces the task of rebuilding the Liberals after a wipeout at the May 3 election.
The break-up would give Ley the time and space she needed to rebuild her party, Littleproud said.
“They are going on a journey of rediscovery and this will provide them the opportunity to do that without the spectre of the National Party imposing their will,” he said.
Littleproud denied the Nationals were a drag on the Liberal vote in the inner cities.
Their policies were popular, especially in their regional seats, and others such as the push to scrap public sector working from home entitlements - spearheaded by Liberal senator Jane Hume - were electoral poison, he said.
https://7news.com.au/news/bombshell-as-nationals-break-up-coalition-agreement-with-liberals-c-18752172
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MdYveTTnwME
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73525
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23058414 (201000ZMAY25) Notable: Anthony Albanese formally invites Pope Leo XIV to Australia in Vatican meeting - Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has met privately with Pope Leo XIV at the Apostolic Palace in Vatican City, formally inviting the new pontiff to Australia for a major Catholic conference that Sydney will host in 2028. Mr Albanese met Leo XIV the day after the new pope's inaugural mass in Rome, hours after the pontiff met US Vice-President JD Vance. He is the first prime minister to have a private audience with the pope since Kevin Rudd, who met Pope Benedict XVI in 2008. The ABC has been told that Mr Albanese and the pope discussed their shared concerns about conflicts around the world and the humanitarian catastrophes they have wrought. The pope also blessed rosary beads that had been owned by the prime minister's mother Maryanne, a staunch Catholic who passed away in 2002. During their meeting on Monday local time, Mr Albanese gifted the new pope a framed Indigenous artwork by artist Amanda Westley, who is part of the Ngarrindjeri clan in South Australia. The prime minister also issued a formal letter of invitation to Pope Leo XIV to attend the International Eucharistic Congress, which Sydney will host in 2028. The congress is typically held every four years, and is expected to draw thousands of Catholics from around the world to Australia. Benedict XVI was the last pope to visit Australia, for World Youth Day in 2008. The prime minister had earlier met briefly with Pope Leo XIV on Sunday after the mass and had a "very warm" discussion before their longer meeting on Monday afternoon. Mr Albanese said that during that brief discussion, the pope had "expressed his affection for Australia". He said he had told Leo that Australia's 5 million Catholics "would be watching and wishing him well".
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73485
>>73514
>>73519
Anthony Albanese formally invites Pope Leo XIV to Australia in Vatican meeting
Stephen Dziedzic - 20 May 2025
Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has met privately with Pope Leo XIV at the Apostolic Palace in Vatican City, formally inviting the new pontiff to Australia for a major Catholic conference that Sydney will host in 2028.
Mr Albanese met Leo XIV the day after the new pope's inaugural mass in Rome, hours after the pontiff met US Vice-President JD Vance.
He is the first prime minister to have a private audience with the pope since Kevin Rudd, who met Pope Benedict XVI in 2008.
The ABC has been told that Mr Albanese and the pope discussed their shared concerns about conflicts around the world and the humanitarian catastrophes they have wrought.
The pope also blessed rosary beads that had been owned by the prime minister's mother Maryanne, a staunch Catholic who passed away in 2002.
On Sunday Pope Leo XIV called for peace in Gaza, Myanmar and Ukraine during a Sunday blessing at the end of his inaugural mass in St Peter's Square.
Leo said he hoped negotiations between Moscow and Kyiv would bring a "just and lasting peace" in Ukraine and offered prayers for the people of Gaza who were "reduced to hunger" by conflict.
During their meeting on Monday local time, Mr Albanese gifted the new pope a framed Indigenous artwork by artist Amanda Westley, who is part of the Ngarrindjeri clan in South Australia.
The prime minister also issued a formal letter of invitation to Pope Leo XIV to attend the International Eucharistic Congress, which Sydney will host in 2028.
The congress is typically held every four years, and is expected to draw thousands of Catholics from around the world to Australia.
Benedict XVI was the last pope to visit Australia, for World Youth Day in 2008.
The prime minister had earlier met briefly with Pope Leo XIV on Sunday after the mass and had a "very warm" discussion before their longer meeting on Monday afternoon.
Mr Albanese said that during that brief discussion, the pope had "expressed his affection for Australia".
He said he had told Leo that Australia's 5 million Catholics "would be watching and wishing him well".
The prime minister also reflected briefly on his own personal Catholic faith and history, saying his late mother would have been delighted to see him attend the Papal Inauguration mass as prime minister.
"I spoke to him about my mother [who] would be I'm sure looking down from heaven with the biggest smile she's ever had, the fact that her son was at the inaugural mass of a pope in the Vatican, was really quite extraordinary" he said.
"So, for me, it was a very personal moment as well, and it was a personal discussion."
The prime minister has now left Rome and will stop off in Singapore for a lightning-quick meeting with Prime Minister Lawrence Wong before returning home.
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-05-20/anthony-albanese-formally-invites-pope-leo-xiv-to-australia/105312312
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73526
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23058421 (201007ZMAY25) Notable: Australia rebukes Israel in joint statement demanding aid for starving Gazans - Australia has joined a coalition of 23 countries demanding the full resumption of humanitarian aid into Gaza and accusing Israel of politicising the delivery of essential food and medicine to Palestinian civilians. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu announced on Monday that Israel would allow some aid to enter Gaza after a two-month blockade, but international aid organisations say this will not be nearly enough to meet the needs of the local population and will risk the lives of aid workers. Netanyahu has said that Israel will take full control of the strip as he ordered the Israeli military to intensify ground operations in the ravaged strip, including by instructing civilians to leave the southern city of Khan Yunis. Penny Wong and the foreign ministers from 22 other nations said in a joint statement they could not support the limited aid delivery the Israeli government had proposed. “It places beneficiaries and aid workers at risk, undermines the role and independence of the UN and our trusted partners, and links humanitarian aid to political and military objectives,” the foreign ministers said. “Humanitarian aid should never be politicised, and Palestinian territory must not be reduced nor subjected to any demographic change.” Alongside Wong, the foreign ministers who signed the 23-nation joint statement are representatives from Belgium, Canada, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Portugal, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden and the UK. “As humanitarian donors, we have two straightforward messages for the government of Israel: allow a full resumption of aid into Gaza immediately and enable the UN and humanitarian organisations to work independently and impartially to save lives, reduce suffering and maintain dignity,” the foreign ministers said. “We remain committed to meeting the acute needs we see in Gaza.”
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Australia rebukes Israel in joint statement demanding aid for starving Gazans
Matthew Knott - May 20, 2025
Australia has joined a coalition of 23 countries demanding the full resumption of humanitarian aid into Gaza and accusing Israel of politicising the delivery of essential food and medicine to Palestinian civilians.
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu announced on Monday that Israel would allow some aid to enter Gaza after a two-month blockade, but international aid organisations say this will not be nearly enough to meet the needs of the local population and will risk the lives of aid workers.
Netanyahu has said that Israel will take full control of the strip as he ordered the Israeli military to intensify ground operations in the ravaged strip, including by instructing civilians to leave the southern city of Khan Yunis.
Penny Wong and the foreign ministers from 22 other nations said in a joint statement they could not support the limited aid delivery the Israeli government had proposed.
“It places beneficiaries and aid workers at risk, undermines the role and independence of the UN and our trusted partners, and links humanitarian aid to political and military objectives,” the foreign ministers said.
“Humanitarian aid should never be politicised, and Palestinian territory must not be reduced nor subjected to any demographic change.”
However, Australia has not gone as far as Canada, France and the United Kingdom, which threatened “concrete actions” against Israel, including sanctions, in a separate statement unless it halts the renewed military offensive in Gaza and lifts aid restrictions. Shortly after the first few aid trucks entered Gaza, the three labelled the aid “wholly inadequate” and called on Israel to stop its “egregious” expansion of operations in the strip.
Alongside Wong, the foreign ministers who signed the 23-nation joint statement are representatives from Belgium, Canada, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Portugal, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden and the UK.
“As humanitarian donors, we have two straightforward messages for the government of Israel: allow a full resumption of aid into Gaza immediately and enable the UN and humanitarian organisations to work independently and impartially to save lives, reduce suffering and maintain dignity,” the foreign ministers said.
“We remain committed to meeting the acute needs we see in Gaza.”
The foreign ministers continued: “Food, medicines and essential supplies are exhausted. The population faces starvation. Gaza’s people must receive the aid they desperately need.”
They also issued a “firm message that Hamas must immediately release all remaining hostages and allow humanitarian assistance to be distributed without interference”.
Save the Children chief executive Mat Tinkler urged Wong to go further and join France, the UK and Canada by threatening sanctions against Israel.
“We are well beyond the point of words – Australia must now be prepared to match its strong rhetoric with decisive action,” he said.
The United Nations’ humanitarian chief, Tom Fletcher, said the resumption of limited aid delivery was a “welcome development” but described it as “a drop in the ocean of what is urgently needed”.
Netanyahu said Israel had devised a new model of aid delivery that would provide “just enough to prevent hunger”.
Addressing Israelis who oppose the delivery of humanitarian aid to Gaza, he said a “red line” was approaching in the form of famine and that even strong supporters of Israel, including US senators, had expressed concerns about the humanitarian situation.
Netanyahu said in a video message: “They come to me and say this, ‘We’re giving you all the support to achieve victory. But there’s one thing we cannot accept. We cannot handle images of starvation’.”
https://www.smh.com.au/politics/federal/australia-blasts-israel-in-joint-statement-demanding-aid-for-starving-gazans-20250520-p5m0nc.html
https://www.foreignminister.gov.au/minister/penny-wong/media-release/joint-donor-statement-humanitarian-aid-gaza
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73527
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23058451 (201032ZMAY25) Notable: AUKUS: Donald Trump’s billionaire envoy joins Keir Starmer in show of force for nuclear submarine pact - British Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer declared AUKUS as central to his government’s defence policy, pledging unprecedented investment and warning that the UK must treat defence as “the first thought in the morning and the last at night”. Starmer was joined by new US ambassador Warren Stephens - a billionaire private banker and big Republican donor – who threw his full support behind the AUKUS pact at a packed event inside the Palace of Westminster on Monday night (Tuesday AEST), calling it “vital” to global peace, security and prosperity. “This is not just a project,” Starmer told MPs, diplomats and defence leaders in a surprise appearance at the gathering. “It is a national endeavour … AUKUS strengthens the bonds between our three nations, and it shows that when we talk about security and stability, we mean it - in the Indo-Pacific and here at home.” The All-Party Parliamentary Group on AUKUS event at the House of Lords marked Stephens’ first public appearance since his arrival in London. He used the opportunity to send a clear message: Donald Trump backs AUKUS. “The vital partnership of our three countries cannot be overstated … President Trump, and I know this to be true as it has been repeatedly proven throughout history.” Stephens said AUKUS could also drive prosperity through an innovative private sector, adding that government works best when “we get out of the way and let our businesses innovate, compete and collaborate to improve people’s lives”. The remarks from the banker-turned-diplomat, who gave at least $US6 million ($9.3 million) to Trump’s election campaign, appeared as a clear pitch to those concerned about the pact’s future after the president’s return to the White House. “This alliance enjoys broad bipartisan support,” said the former chief executive of financial services company Stephens Inc. “I’m sure that you all are aware that bipartisanship is certainly not always the case in American politics these days. However, it is when it comes to AUKUS.”
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73432
AUKUS: Donald Trump’s billionaire envoy joins Keir Starmer in show of force for nuclear submarine pact
Rob Harris - May 20, 2025
1/2
London: British Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer declared AUKUS as central to his government’s defence policy, pledging unprecedented investment and warning that the UK must treat defence as “the first thought in the morning and the last at night”.
Starmer was joined by new US ambassador Warren Stephens – a billionaire private banker and big Republican donor – who threw his full support behind the AUKUS pact at a packed event inside the Palace of Westminster on Monday night (Tuesday AEST), calling it “vital” to global peace, security and prosperity.
“This is not just a project,” Starmer told MPs, diplomats and defence leaders in a surprise appearance at the gathering.
“It is a national endeavour … AUKUS strengthens the bonds between our three nations, and it shows that when we talk about security and stability, we mean it – in the Indo-Pacific and here at home.”
The All-Party Parliamentary Group on AUKUS event at the House of Lords marked Stephens’ first public appearance since his arrival in London.
He used the opportunity to send a clear message: Donald Trump backs AUKUS.
“The vital partnership of our three countries cannot be overstated ... President Trump, and I know this to be true as it has been repeatedly proven throughout history.”
Stephens said AUKUS could also drive prosperity through an innovative private sector, adding that government works best when “we get out of the way and let our businesses innovate, compete and collaborate to improve people’s lives”.
The remarks from the banker-turned-diplomat, who gave at least $US6 million ($9.3 million) to Trump’s election campaign, appeared as a clear pitch to those concerned about the pact’s future after the president’s return to the White House.
“This alliance enjoys broad bipartisan support,” said the former chief executive of financial services company Stephens Inc.
“I’m sure that you all are aware that bipartisanship is certainly not always the case in American politics these days. However, it is when it comes to AUKUS.”
Stephens said it was reassuring to see that that same support was reflected in the room – which included Australian high commissioner Stephen Smith and former defence minister Linda Reynolds – adding that AUKUS was “a partnership built on trust”.
“The United States is proud to stand alongside Britain and Australia, two of our closest allies, as we deepen our collaboration to respond to a changing world,” Stephens said.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73528
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23062839 (210931ZMAY25) Notable: Video: Liberals back Nationals' split as 'necessary reset' after election lashing - Some senior Liberals have quietly voiced support for the Nationals' decision to walk away from the Coalition, describing the dramatic split as a necessary - if uncomfortable — reset following the opposition's devastating federal election defeat, even as Liberal luminary John Howard calls on the parties to reunite. While few are willing to endorse the move publicly, multiple Liberal MPs told ABC News the Coalition had become politically untenable, with the Nationals increasingly seen as obstructive on key policy fronts - particularly on climate policy — and a drag in crucial metropolitan electorates. "This gives us breathing space," one MP said. "After a loss like that, everything has to be on the table." Another added: "This helps us as Liberals rebadge and reposition. It's clear that the link with the Nationals was compromising our policies and hurting our brand appeal, especially in the cities. "They were net beneficiaries in the relationship. We were net losers in electoral terms and the link with the 'climate deniers' of Barnaby [Joyce] and [Matt] Canavan hurt us greatly in cities, with women, and with non-boomer voters." A third Liberal was more philosophical: "Maybe you have to hit rock bottom before you start to rebuild and part of hitting rock bottom is this split."
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73455
>>73501
>>73523
Liberals back Nationals' split as 'necessary reset' after election lashing
Olivia Caisley - 21 May 2025
1/2
Some senior Liberals have quietly voiced support for the Nationals' decision to walk away from the Coalition, describing the dramatic split as a necessary — if uncomfortable — reset following the opposition's devastating federal election defeat, even as Liberal luminary John Howard calls on the parties to reunite.
While few are willing to endorse the move publicly, multiple Liberal MPs told ABC News the Coalition had become politically untenable, with the Nationals increasingly seen as obstructive on key policy fronts — particularly on climate policy — and a drag in crucial metropolitan electorates.
"This gives us breathing space," one MP said.
"After a loss like that, everything has to be on the table."
Another added: "This helps us as Liberals rebadge and reposition. It's clear that the link with the Nationals was compromising our policies and hurting our brand appeal, especially in the cities.
"They were net beneficiaries in the relationship. We were net losers in electoral terms and the link with the 'climate deniers' of Barnaby [Joyce] and [Matt] Canavan hurt us greatly in cities, with women, and with non-boomer voters."
A third Liberal was more philosophical: "Maybe you have to hit rock bottom before you start to rebuild and part of hitting rock bottom is this split."
But Mr Howard told ABC AM he was "very concerned" about the separation and urged the parties to come to a resolution.
"I would urge the leaders of those parties to work very hard to put the Coalition together," he said.
"It is my very strong opinion that policy differences are best resolved within the framework of the Coalition.
"If the two parties remain separate for too long away from the Coalition then the differences on policy will harden and will be more difficult to resolve."
Mr Howard, who was prime minister from 1996 to 2007, said he had been able to resolve policy differences within the Coalition, and he urged Nationals leader David Littleproud and Opposition Leader Sussan Ley to remember the parties' "glory days" had been when they were united.
Mr Littleproud announced the bombshell split just before midday on Tuesday, citing a breakdown in negotiations over demands to enshrine policies such as the development of nuclear energy, expanded divestiture powers for supermarkets, a $20 billion regional future fund, and enforceable service obligations in regional areas in the Coalition agreement that binds the two teams.
A joint statement from Ms Ley and the Liberal leadership emphasised that Coalition agreements had historically focused on cabinet role allocation rather than binding policy positions. It also noted that the Nationals had refused to uphold shadow cabinet confidentiality, which obliges shadow ministers to adhere to unified joint-party stances.
As one Liberal MP put it: "The Nats' demands were clearly over the top this time around — we could never have agreed to them."
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73529
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23067420 (220857ZMAY25) Notable: Video: Coalition seeks to reverse break-up just two days after sensational split - The Coalition could come back together within weeks after Nationals leader David Littleproud and Liberal leader Sussan Ley agreed to put their next steps on hold while they search for a fix that will allow their MPs to walk back into parliament together. Littleproud announced the dramatic about-face in a snap press conference in Canberra on Thursday, just two days after he walked away from the Coalition partnership - the first split in 38 years. He said it followed a meeting with Ley on Thursday morning, in which he agreed to her request that he give her time to convene a meeting of Liberal MPs to discuss the Nationals’ four policy demands for a Coalition agreement. Both Littleproud and Ley had planned to unveil their separate portfolio spokespeople on Thursday afternoon. But Littleproud said he had sent his team home from Canberra “in good faith”, and that Ley would also refrain from unveiling her frontbench pending further Liberal party room meetings. “This is a positive step forward, one in which we’ve always said we’d be productive and constructive, and I think the Nationals have acted in good faith,” he said. “I’m proud to say that we’ll allow this process to take place and the Liberal Party to convene at whatever period is for them and convenient for them, and I think that is the way forward in a mature and sensible. I’ve always said that I’d be constructive moving forward … This will allow time for a process for Sussan Ley to call her party room together to discuss those four policy areas.”
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73455
>>73501
>>73523
Coalition seeks to reverse break-up just two days after sensational split
Natassia Chrysanthos - May 22, 2025
1/2
The Coalition could come back together within weeks after Nationals leader David Littleproud and Liberal leader Sussan Ley agreed to put their next steps on hold while they search for a fix that will allow their MPs to walk back into parliament together.
Littleproud announced the dramatic about-face in a snap press conference in Canberra on Thursday, just two days after he walked away from the Coalition partnership – the first split in 38 years.
He said it followed a meeting with Ley on Thursday morning, in which he agreed to her request that he give her time to convene a meeting of Liberal MPs to discuss the Nationals’ four policy demands for a Coalition agreement.
Both Littleproud and Ley had planned to unveil their separate portfolio spokespeople on Thursday afternoon. But Littleproud said he had sent his team home from Canberra “in good faith”, and that Ley would also refrain from unveiling her frontbench pending further Liberal party room meetings.
“This is a positive step forward, one in which we’ve always said we’d be productive and constructive, and I think the Nationals have acted in good faith,” he said.
“I’m proud to say that we’ll allow this process to take place and the Liberal Party to convene at whatever period is for them and convenient for them, and I think that is the way forward in a mature and sensible.
“I’ve always said that I’d be constructive moving forward … This will allow time for a process for Sussan Ley to call her party room together to discuss those four policy areas.”
The Nationals had demanded that four policies be enshrined in the next Coalition agreement: lifting the ban on nuclear energy, divestiture powers for supermarket chains, a $20 billion regional future fund, and service obligations for regional areas.
But Ley said she could not commit to those demands until the Liberals had undergone a full policy review that she had promised her party room and Australian voters after a thumping election loss.
Littleproud had also requested that Nationals MP be exempt from shadow cabinet confidentiality, which obliges frontbenchers to maintain the joint party position on policy issues. Ley rejected this.
On Thursday, Littleproud said he understood Ley’s reasons for denying that request and would not be pushing for it going forward.
Ley welcomed that commitment “as a foundation to resolve other matters” in a statement issued shortly after Littleproud’s announcement.
“Earlier today, I wrote to, and met with, David inviting him to re-enter good-faith negotiations. I am pleased he has accepted,” she said.
“In relation to the policy positions proposed by the National party room, consistent with my consultation commitment, the Liberal Party will consider these, utilising our party room processes.
“It has always been the Liberal Party’s objective to form a Coalition and we welcome The Nationals’ decision to re-enter negotiations.”
Ley had reached out to Nationals MPs Michael McCormack, Barnaby Joyce and Darren Chester to salvage the situation on Wednesday night and Thursday morning, after this masthead reported that the three MPs, as well as Victorian MP Sam Birrell, expressed concerns about the split in a party room meeting.
Chester and McCormack had privately urged Littleproud to make a deal with Ley, after a range of party elders, including former Liberal prime ministers John Howard and Tony Abbott, publicly opposed the split.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73530
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23067458 (220918ZMAY25) Notable: Video: ‘Look at Australia’: Trump ambushes South African president over ‘white genocide’ - US President Donald Trump confronted his South African counterpart with unfounded claims of a genocide of Afrikaner farmers, and ranted extensively about the American media, in another extraordinary and tense Oval Office meeting with a foreign leader. Trump dimmed the lights and played a video purporting to back up his assertions about the state-sanctioned mass murder of Afrikaners, the white ethnic minority that ruled South Africa during apartheid, as the country’s president, Cyril Ramaphosa, was made to watch. Trump twice cited Australia as evidence during the exchange, claiming both Australia and the United States were being flooded with white South African farmers. Dozens arrived in the US last week after the Trump administration fast-tracked their approval as refugees. “You take a look at Australia, they’re being inundated and we’re being inundated with people that want to get out,” Trump said. “This is a very serious situation and … if we had a real press, this would be exposed.” Trump held up printouts of articles about white farmers whom he said had been the victims of farm attacks, including robberies, land dispossession and murders. Gang violence is rife in South Africa, although as Ramaphosa and other officials pointed out during the Oval Office meeting, most murder victims in South Africa are black. “You’re taking people’s land away from them,” Trump told Ramaphosa. “We have not,” Ramaphosa responded. Trump continued: “And those people in many cases are being executed. And they happen to be white, and most of them happen to be farmers. That’s a tough situation, I don’t know how you explain that. How do you explain that? “We have thousands of people that want to come into our country. They’re also going to Australia, in a smaller number … They’re white farmers and they feel like they’re going to die.” Later, the White House issued links to several media reports it said proved Trump was right about the situation in South Africa. It included two reports from Australia’s news.com.au from 2017 and 2018, and a television editorial by Sky News Australia’s Rita Panahi.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
‘Look at Australia’: Trump ambushes South African president over ‘white genocide’
Michael Koziol - May 22, 2025
1/2
Washington: US President Donald Trump confronted his South African counterpart with unfounded claims of a genocide of Afrikaner farmers, and ranted extensively about the American media, in another extraordinary and tense Oval Office meeting with a foreign leader.
Trump dimmed the lights and played a video purporting to back up his assertions about the state-sanctioned mass murder of Afrikaners, the white ethnic minority that ruled South Africa during apartheid, as the country’s president, Cyril Ramaphosa, was made to watch.
Trump twice cited Australia as evidence during the exchange, claiming both Australia and the United States were being flooded with white South African farmers. Dozens arrived in the US last week after the Trump administration fast-tracked their approval as refugees.
“You take a look at Australia, they’re being inundated and we’re being inundated with people that want to get out,” Trump said. “This is a very serious situation and … if we had a real press, this would be exposed.”
Trump held up printouts of articles about white farmers whom he said had been the victims of farm attacks, including robberies, land dispossession and murders.
Gang violence is rife in South Africa, although as Ramaphosa and other officials pointed out during the Oval Office meeting, most murder victims in South Africa are black.
“You’re taking people’s land away from them,” Trump told Ramaphosa.
“We have not,” Ramaphosa responded.
Trump continued: “And those people in many cases are being executed. And they happen to be white, and most of them happen to be farmers. That’s a tough situation, I don’t know how you explain that. How do you explain that?
“We have thousands of people that want to come into our country. They’re also going to Australia, in a smaller number … They’re white farmers and they feel like they’re going to die.”
Later, the White House issued links to several media reports it said proved Trump was right about the situation in South Africa. It included two reports from Australia’s news.com.au from 2017 and 2018, and a television editorial by Sky News Australia’s Rita Panahi.
The tense exchange did not rise to a shouting match, but represented the most contentious Oval Office meeting since Trump and Vice President J.D. Vance ambushed Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky in late February.
The video shown in the Oval Office on Wednesday, Washington time, included clips from an incendiary speech by Julius Malema, leader of the communist Economic Freedom Fighters political party, insisting South Africans would occupy land without regard for the law.
“We don’t care, we can do whatever we want to do,” Malema said in the clip.
Ramaphosa told Trump that Malema belonged to a minority party that was allowed to exist under the South African Constitution and that his words did not constitute government policy.
At one point, Trump handed the article print-outs to Ramaphosa and said: “Those are all recent, those are all deaths.”
Ramaphosa said he appreciated that the US, as a South African partner, was raising genuine concerns about crime and would be happy to discuss them away from the cameras.
“We were taught by Nelson Mandela that whenever there are problems, people need to sit around a table and talk about it,” he said, referring to the former anti-apartheid activist who became South African president after decades in prison.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73531
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23067527 (220954ZMAY25) Notable: Investigators probe Ben Roberts-Smith over more murders and video drinking from dead man’s prosthetic limb - The secretive agency investigating war criminal Ben Roberts-Smith over multiple murders, including cases not canvassed in his marathon defamation trial, has secured the co-operation of new witnesses. Amid the damning fresh evidence is footage of the disgraced ex-soldier swilling beer from the prosthetic leg of an Afghan man he executed. Roberts-Smith’s comprehensive loss before the full bench of the Federal Court - which affirmed the finding that the Special Air Service Regiment veteran ordered the murder of four Afghans – paves the way for the Office of the Special Investigator (OSI) to move to prosecute the former corporal. The OSI is examining suspected murders beyond the four cases that were part of the ex-soldier’s failed bid to clear his name. Five sources with knowledge of the OSI’s ongoing four-year investigation said its investigators had secured co-operation from key witnesses who had not participated in Roberts-Smith’s defamation trial. The OSI is working closely with the Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions as it builds its case against Roberts-Smith, having collected statements from over a dozen SASR soldiers who claim Roberts-Smith arranged or participated in executions, including an incident in which he kicked a bound civilian off a small cliff. The OSI has also uncovered a video of Roberts-Smith drinking from the prosthetic leg of a man he had earlier executed during an Easter Sunday 2009 operation targeting a compound called Whiskey 108. The video was filmed in a makeshift bar called the Fat Lady’s Arms at the Australian army base in southern Afghanistan and contradicts Roberts-Smith’s evidence during his defamation trial when he told Justice Anthony Besanko he had never drunk from the plastic leg.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73512
>>73513
Investigators probe Ben Roberts-Smith over more murders and video drinking from dead man’s prosthetic limb
Nick McKenzie - May 22, 2025
1/2
The secretive agency investigating war criminal Ben Roberts-Smith over multiple murders, including cases not canvassed in his marathon defamation trial, has secured the co-operation of new witnesses.
Amid the damning fresh evidence is footage of the disgraced ex-soldier swilling beer from the prosthetic leg of an Afghan man he executed.
Roberts-Smith’s comprehensive loss before the full bench of the Federal Court – which affirmed the finding that the Special Air Service Regiment veteran ordered the murder of four Afghans – paves the way for the Office of the Special Investigator (OSI) to move to prosecute the former corporal.
The OSI is examining suspected murders beyond the four cases that were part of the ex-soldier’s failed bid to clear his name.
Five sources with knowledge of the OSI’s ongoing four-year investigation said its investigators had secured co-operation from key witnesses who had not participated in Roberts-Smith’s defamation trial.
The OSI is working closely with the Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions as it builds its case against Roberts-Smith, having collected statements from over a dozen SASR soldiers who claim Roberts-Smith arranged or participated in executions, including an incident in which he kicked a bound civilian off a small cliff.
The OSI has also uncovered a video of Roberts-Smith drinking from the prosthetic leg of a man he had earlier executed during an Easter Sunday 2009 operation targeting a compound called Whiskey 108.
The video was filmed in a makeshift bar called the Fat Lady’s Arms at the Australian army base in southern Afghanistan and contradicts Roberts-Smith’s evidence during his defamation trial when he told Justice Anthony Besanko he had never drunk from the plastic leg.
During his opening remarks at the start of the case, Roberts-Smith’s barrister, Bruce McClintock, told the court: “My client did not drink from the leg. The respondents have been desperately trying to find evidence that he did, but he never did.”
When he was directly asked in court during cross-examination, “Did you yourself drink from the leg?” Roberts-Smith replied: “No, I didn’t.”
However, the video uncovered by the OSI shows the disgraced soldier being passed the prosthetic leg before sculling from it during a party at the Fat Lady’s Arms.
On Tuesday, the full bench of the Federal Court released their judgment, explaining why they upheld Justice Besanko’s 2023 decision that Roberts-Smith was complicit in the murder of four unarmed prisoners, including the man with the prosthetic leg, while deployed in Afghanistan between 2009 and 2012.
Federal Court justices Nye Perram, Anna Katzmann and Geoffrey Kennett found the evidence was sufficiently cogent to conclude that Roberts-Smith was a war criminal who had disgraced his country and the SASR, including by having machine-gunned the unarmed prisoner with a prosthetic leg outside Whiskey 108.
The three senior judges said the latter finding was based on the compelling testimony of three of Roberts-Smith’s fellow SASR soldiers.
“The problem for [Roberts-Smith] is that, unlike most homicides, there were three eyewitnesses to this murder,” the three judges concluded.
“When all is said and done, it is a rare murder that is witnessed by three independent witnesses. This strength of this evidence cannot be erased, and is in no way undermined, by peripheral inconsistencies.”
The appeal court also said that “the killing of the man with the prosthetic leg in such a dramatic fashion does suggest a certain recklessness or perhaps even brazenness” on Roberts-Smith’s part.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73532
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23067540 (221007ZMAY25) Notable: 'Recovered' Assange promotes Cannes documentary - Wikileaks founder Julian Assange has "recovered" from his years in detention, his wife told AFP, as a new documentary about him premiered at the Cannes film festival on Wednesday. Assange is at the world's biggest film festival to promote "The Six Billion Dollar Man" by American director Eugene Jarecki but is not yet speaking publicly. After posing for photographers on Tuesday wearing a T-shirt with the names of killed Gaza children, he reappeared Wednesday for the red-carpet screening wearing a black tuxedo. The 53-year-old former hacker has declined all interview requests, however, with his wife Stella Assange saying that "he'll speak when he's ready." But she was upbeat about his health and said he was already thinking about his next steps. "We live with incredible nature at our doorstep (in Australia). Julian's very outdoorsy. He always has been. He's really recovered physically and mentally," Stella, a Spanish-Swedish lawyer, told AFP. Assange was released from a high-security British prison last June after a plea bargain with the US government over Wikileaks's work publishing top-secret military and diplomatic information. He spent five years behind bars fighting extradition from Britain and another seven holed up in the Ecuador embassy in London where he claimed political asylum. Award-winning director Jarecki said his film aimed to correct the record about Assange, whose methods and personality make him a divisive figure. "I think Julian Assange put himself in harm's way for the principle of informing the public about what corporations and governments around the world are doing in secret," Jarecki told AFP. Anyone willing to trade years of their life for their principles, "I think you'd have to look at that person as having heroic qualities," he added.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73411
>>73446
'Recovered' Assange promotes Cannes documentary
AFP / news.com.au - May 22, 2025
Wikileaks founder Julian Assange has "recovered" from his years in detention, his wife told AFP, as a new documentary about him premiered at the Cannes film festival on Wednesday.
Assange is at the world's biggest film festival to promote "The Six Billion Dollar Man" by American director Eugene Jarecki but is not yet speaking publicly.
After posing for photographers on Tuesday wearing a T-shirt with the names of killed Gaza children, he reappeared Wednesday for the red-carpet screening wearing a black tuxedo.
The 53-year-old former hacker has declined all interview requests, however, with his wife Stella Assange saying that "he'll speak when he's ready."
But she was upbeat about his health and said he was already thinking about his next steps.
"We live with incredible nature at our doorstep (in Australia). Julian's very outdoorsy. He always has been. He's really recovered physically and mentally," Stella, a Spanish-Swedish lawyer, told AFP.
Assange was released from a high-security British prison last June after a plea bargain with the US government over Wikileaks's work publishing top-secret military and diplomatic information.
He spent five years behind bars fighting extradition from Britain and another seven holed up in the Ecuador embassy in London where he claimed political asylum.
'Right side of history'
Award-winning director Jarecki said his film aimed to correct the record about Assange, whose methods and personality make him a divisive figure.
"I think Julian Assange put himself in harm's way for the principle of informing the public about what corporations and governments around the world are doing in secret," Jarecki told AFP.
Anyone willing to trade years of their life for their principles, "I think you'd have to look at that person as having heroic qualities," he added.
The film includes never-seen footage, including personal videos handed over by Stella, a Wikileaks lawyer who had two children with Assange while he was living in the Ecuadorian embassy.
It also features testimony from people who helped spy on Assange, including an Icelandic FBI informant and a private security agent who said he installed bugs accessed by US security services in the Ecuadorian embassy.
Ecuador's left-wing former president Rafael Correa, who offered Assange asylum in the Ecuadorian embassy in London, also attended Wednesday's screening.
"I believe we were on the right side of history," he told AFP.
Jarecki's film seeks to address criticism of Assange, notably that he endangered lives by publishing unredacted US documents which included the names of people who had spoken to American diplomats or spies.
'Complete fabrication'
The film extensively features supportive figures, while giving little time to opposing views.
"Baywatch" actress and Assange friend Pamela Anderson makes an appearance, as does American whistleblower Edward Snowden, and left-wing Greek ex-minister Yanis Varifakis who compares the Wikileaks founder to Greek god Prometheus.
The film lays the blame for the publication of a trove of 251,000 US diplomatic cables by Wikileaks in 2011 on veteran investigative British journalist David Leigh, alleging he published the password to access the database.
Leigh, who collaborated with Assange while working at the Guardian newspaper, told AFP he had never been contacted by Jarecki and he called the theory "a complete fabrication".
"It was Julian and Julian alone who did it. He's been trying to find an excuse ever since," he said by phone.
Jarecki also dismissed any links between Wikileaks and Russian intelligence services over the leak of Democratic Party emails ahead of the 2016 US presidential election which embarrassed Democrat candidate Hillary Clinton.
An investigation by US special counsel Robert Mueller, who probed alleged Russian interference in the 2016 vote, found evidence that Russian military intelligence hacked the Democratic Party and passed the information to Wikileaks.
The documentary also examines the role of Swedish prosecutors in starting a sexual assault investigation into Assange, concluding that there was no case to answer.
https://www.news.com.au/breaking-news/recovered-assange-promotes-cannes-documentary-about-his-life/news-story/88198e46fa5f893f57571aea9f2c9986
https://x.com/wikileaks/status/1925339756394594583
https://x.com/wikileaks/status/1924797064526942633
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73533
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23072269 (231252ZMAY25) Notable: Liberals and Nationals closer on Coalition fix, spotlight moves to Littleproud leadership - The Liberal and National parties are inching towards reforming the Coalition after Liberal MPs gave Sussan Ley in-principle agreement for most of David Littleproud’s policy demands, but speculation is growing about Littleproud’s future as leader of the regional party. Ley convened a lively party room meeting on Friday afternoon at which her MPs gave their leader the authority to strike a deal with the Nationals to create a joint shadow cabinet by the time parliament resumes, days after Littleproud sparked chaos by splitting from the Liberals. Critically, the Nationals ditched the plan to build seven nuclear power sites, paving the way for a watered-down Coalition policy to merely lift the moratorium and allow for potential private investment into nuclear energy. The in-principle agreement does not extend to the precise details of Littleproud’s demands, which are still due to be thrashed out in a shadow cabinet. Moderate Liberal MPs expressed concerns about Littleproud’s demand, first reported in this masthead, to extend forced supermarket break-up laws to big-box retailers such as Chemist Warehouse and Officeworks. Liberals also have doubts about the administration and funding of the $20 billion regional building fund, highlighting the potential for a bumpy path back to reunification. The turbulent week in right-wing politics has led to chatter inside the Nationals about whether Littleproud could survive the affair. His leadership is bolstered by the lack of widespread support for any other contender, but former leader Barnaby Joyce told at least one colleague on Friday that Littleproud’s position was precarious.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73501
>>73523
>>73529
Liberals and Nationals closer on Coalition fix, spotlight moves to Littleproud leadership
Paul Sakkal - May 23, 2025
1/2
The Liberal and National parties are inching towards reforming the Coalition after Liberal MPs gave Sussan Ley in-principle agreement for most of David Littleproud’s policy demands, but speculation is growing about Littleproud’s future as leader of the regional party.
Ley convened a lively party room meeting on Friday afternoon at which her MPs gave their leader the authority to strike a deal with the Nationals to create a joint shadow cabinet by the time parliament resumes, days after Littleproud sparked chaos by splitting from the Liberals.
Critically, the Nationals ditched the plan to build seven nuclear power sites, paving the way for a watered-down Coalition policy to merely lift the moratorium and allow for potential private investment into nuclear energy.
The in-principle agreement does not extend to the precise details of Littleproud’s demands, which are still due to be thrashed out in a shadow cabinet. Moderate Liberal MPs expressed concerns about Littleproud’s demand, first reported in this masthead, to extend forced supermarket break-up laws to big-box retailers such as Chemist Warehouse and Officeworks.
Liberals also have doubts about the administration and funding of the $20 billion regional building fund, highlighting the potential for a bumpy path back to reunification.
The turbulent week in right-wing politics has led to chatter inside the Nationals about whether Littleproud could survive the affair.
His leadership is bolstered by the lack of widespread support for any other contender, but former leader Barnaby Joyce told at least one colleague on Friday that Littleproud’s position was precarious.
Joyce has been unwell and does not have the numbers to win. But according to party sources unable to speak publicly, Joyce told colleagues he would be open to supporting another former leader, Michael McCormack.
McCormack stressed on Friday morning that Littleproud was not under threat. But asked if he fully backed Littleproud, McCormack uttered the same words as Scott Morrison did in the days before toppling Malcolm Turnbull: “I’m ambitious for him”.
“It’s been messy, it’s been really messy and for people on the outside looking in they just wonder what the hell is going on,” McCormack said on ABC Canberra.
One Nationals MP, who asked not to be named so they could speak freely, said “the clock is now ticking” on Littleproud’s leadership, but his backers insist such talk is hypocritical because his decisions were made in conjunction with his MPs.
“Three people have significantly damaged themselves this week, David, Bridget [McKenzie] and Kevin [Hogan]. And this was all self-inflicted. I’m not sure if David is terminal but it has been a very bad week,” the second Nationals MP said.
Senior Nationals MP Darren Chester told Sky News that he backed Littleproud “without equivocation”.
“It was only a matter of 12 or 13 days ago, David was elected by our party room ... so people do need to remember that the decisions that were taken this week were taken with the majority support of the party room,” he said.
Nationals senator Matt Canavan, who challenged Littleproud for the leadership, said: “David has done a great job for the Nationals this week and he has delivered real results after the Liberals’ backdown”.
“I know the Liberals are unhappy, but if some of them fought the Labor Party as hard as they have been fighting the Nats this week, we may have done a lot better at the election,” Canavan said.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73534
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23072429 (231356ZMAY25) Notable: Kevin Rudd says Donald Trump’s ban on foreign students at Harvard is ‘distressing’ - Donald Trump’s administration on Thursday revoked Harvard’s right to enrol foreign students - more than a quarter of its annual intake – in a major escalation of the President’s fight with one of the world’s most storied universities. The university in Cambridge, Massachusetts, quickly slammed the move as “unlawful” and said it would hurt both the campus and the country, while one student said the community was “panicking”. Australia’s US Ambassador Kevin Rudd said the decision to block foreign students from enrolling at Harvard University was “distressing” for Australian students. Mr Rudd says he is working with the Trump administration following its decision. “We are monitoring closely developments at Harvard University in relation to the administration’s statement this afternoon on the future enrolment of international students,” Dr Rudd wrote in a post to social media platform X on Friday. “I know this will be distressing for Harvard’s many Australian students. The Embassy is working with the United States Government to obtain the details of this decision so that Australian students can receive appropriate advice.” According to the Ivy League institution, approximately 120 Australian students are enrolled at the university. The decision dramatically deepens the rift between Mr Trump and the university, and will force thousands of international students enrolled at the university to either relocate to another institution or leave the US entirely. Mr Trump is furious at Harvard, which has produced 162 Nobel prize-winners, for rejecting his demand that it submit to oversight on admissions and hiring over his claims that it is a hotbed of anti-Semitism and “woke” liberal ideology.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Kevin Rudd says Donald Trump’s ban on foreign students at Harvard is ‘distressing’
JACK QUAIL - 23 May 2025
1/2
Donald Trump’s administration on Thursday revoked Harvard’s right to enrol foreign students – more than a quarter of its annual intake – in a major escalation of the President’s fight with one of the world’s most storied universities.
The university in Cambridge, Massachusetts, quickly slammed the move as “unlawful” and said it would hurt both the campus and the country, while one student said the community was “panicking”.
Australia’s US Ambassador Kevin Rudd said the decision to block foreign students from enrolling at Harvard University was “distressing” for Australian students.
Mr Rudd says he is working with the Trump administration following its decision.
“We are monitoring closely developments at Harvard University in relation to the administration’s statement this afternoon on the future enrolment of international students,” Dr Rudd wrote in a post to social media platform X on Friday.
“I know this will be distressing for Harvard’s many Australian students. The Embassy is working with the United States Government to obtain the details of this decision so that Australian students can receive appropriate advice.”
According to the Ivy League institution, approximately 120 Australian students are enrolled at the university.
The decision dramatically deepens the rift between Mr Trump and the university, and will force thousands of international students enrolled at the university to either relocate to another institution or leave the US entirely.
Mr Trump is furious at Harvard, which has produced 162 Nobel prize-winners, for rejecting his demand that it submit to oversight on admissions and hiring over his claims that it is a hotbed of anti-Semitism and “woke” liberal ideology.
“Effective immediately, Harvard University’s Student and Exchange Visitor (SEVIS) Program certification is revoked,” Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem wrote in a letter to the Ivy League institution, referring to the main system by which foreign students are permitted to study in the US.
The loss of such a large proportion of the student body could prove to be a huge financial blow to Harvard, which charges tens of thousands of dollars a year in tuition.
Harvard, which has sued the government over a separate raft of punitive measures, quickly fired back, calling the move unlawful. “We are fully committed to maintaining Harvard’s ability to host our international students and scholars,” it said in a statement, adding that it was working to offer students guidance and support.
“This retaliatory action threatens serious harm to the Harvard community and our country, and undermines Harvard’s academic and research mission.”
Karl Molden, an international student from Austria, said he had applied to study at Oxford University in the UK because he feared such measures.
“It’s scary and it’s saddening,” the 21-year-old government and classics student told AFP. “I love Harvard, and getting into the school has been the greatest privilege of my life.
“It’s definitely going to change the perception of ... students who (might) consider studying there – the US is getting less of an attractive spot for higher education.”
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73535
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23076612 (241305ZMAY25) Notable: Zoe Daniel calls for Goldstein recount after Tim Wilson wins by 260 votes - Zoe Daniel has requested a recount in Goldstein after counting today arrived at a final margin of 260 votes in favour of Liberal Tim Wilson. The Australian Electoral Commission automatically undertakes a recount if the margin is under 100 votes, but candidates can also request one if they have sufficient grounds. A spokesman for the AEC said the full distribution of preferences was finalised today in favour of Wilson. “A recount request is being considered, and an announcement regarding that decision will be made when able,” he said. Daniel said: “In light of the very tight margin and several errors being picked up in the portion of the count that was included in the distribution of preferences, leading to unusual fluctuations and large numbers of votes moving to and fro in the final stages of the count, I have taken expert advice and asked the AEC to consider whether a full recount is appropriate. “There are also several outstanding questions regarding the broader count which would be resolved by a recount. As always, I will respect the process and await the commission’s decision.” Posting to social media platform X, Wilson said the AEC had confirmed the final Goldstein margin of 260 votes in his favour. “We have continually had a majority of votes for nearly three weeks, and it never fell below 100 which is the threshold for an automatic recount,” he said. Wilson said the votes had been counted at least four times and Liberal and teal volunteers had scrutineered the count. “And now the former MP is asking for a full recount,” he said. “At some point we should respect the professional staff at the [AEC]. I wish Zoe Daniel, her family and staff well in the next chapter. I hope she finds peace.” Daniel initially claimed victory in Goldstein on election night but postal votes came in strongly in Wilson’s favour leading him to claim a win in the seat two weeks ago. However, Daniel did not concede and since then the count in Goldstein has continued, with Daniel narrowing the margin to as little as 128 votes to Wilson at one stage.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73455
>>73473
>>73477
Zoe Daniel calls for Goldstein recount after Tim Wilson wins by 260 votes
Cara Waters - May 24, 2025
Zoe Daniel has requested a recount in Goldstein after counting today arrived at a final margin of 260 votes in favour of Liberal Tim Wilson.
The Australian Electoral Commission automatically undertakes a recount if the margin is under 100 votes, but candidates can also request one if they have sufficient grounds.
A spokesman for the AEC said the full distribution of preferences was finalised today in favour of Wilson.
“A recount request is being considered, and an announcement regarding that decision will be made when able,” he said.
Daniel said: “In light of the very tight margin and several errors being picked up in the portion of the count that was included in the distribution of preferences, leading to unusual fluctuations and large numbers of votes moving to and fro in the final stages of the count, I have taken expert advice and asked the AEC to consider whether a full recount is appropriate.
“There are also several outstanding questions regarding the broader count which would be resolved by a recount. As always, I will respect the process and await the commission’s decision.”
Posting to social media platform X, Wilson said the AEC had confirmed the final Goldstein margin of 260 votes in his favour.
“We have continually had a majority of votes for nearly three weeks, and it never fell below 100 which is the threshold for an automatic recount,” he said.
Wilson said the votes had been counted at least four times and Liberal and teal volunteers had scrutineered the count.
“And now the former MP is asking for a full recount,” he said. “At some point we should respect the professional staff at the [AEC]. I wish Zoe Daniel, her family and staff well in the next chapter. I hope she finds peace.”
Daniel initially claimed victory in Goldstein on election night but postal votes came in strongly in Wilson’s favour leading him to claim a win in the seat two weeks ago.
However, Daniel did not concede and since then the count in Goldstein has continued, with Daniel narrowing the margin to as little as 128 votes to Wilson at one stage.
Daniel has been getting advice from data scientist Simon Jackman, who has pointed out the increased size of electorates since the 100-vote trigger for a recount was decided in 2007, and to anomalies in the count.
Jackman said the AEC’s 100-vote guidance was implemented following the McEwen recount of 2007.
“That 100 votes is not key to an error rate, it’s an absolute number,” he said. “It was conjured up in 2007 when electorates were a lot smaller than they are now.”
Jackman said that because Goldstein was 40 per cent larger than the average electorate in 2007, he thought Daniel could make the argument that a 100-vote margin in 2007 was a 140-vote margin today.
Jackman also said there were anomalies in the Goldstein count that might deserve a recount.
“If you look closely at the Goldstein count, there are a few hiccups in the count,” he said. “The AEC or someone has made a mistake at the Hampton pre-poll voting centre where a huge bundle of votes that were given to Zoe Daniel were then taken away, and it looks like they may have gone over to the Greens candidate in large [part].”
Jackman said the count had been “a bit bumpy” in some polling centres in Goldstein, particularly the Brighton pre-poll centre, and a recount would help dissipate any concerns.
“Why not take another two or three days to just put any issues to bed and that way no one’s got any argument at all?” he said.
https://www.theage.com.au/politics/federal/zoe-daniel-calls-for-goldstein-recount-20250522-p5m1fx.html
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73536
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23076711 (241335ZMAY25) Notable: As Mel’s gender ‘ricocheted’, she went under a surgeon’s knife - A young woman who thought for years she was non-binary or a transgender man is suing two doctors and Monash Health for negligence, claiming gender treatment that included having both breasts surgically removed had caused her “significant injury”. Mel Jefferies, a 33-year-old who was born as female and is now living again as a woman, has launched the civil lawsuit in the Victorian County Court. One of the defendants in the case is Dr Jeff Willcox, a Melbourne GP with an “interest in gay men’s health, sexual health … and transgender health”. The others are Jaco Erasmus, a psychiatrist with a special interest in transgender health, and Victoria’s largest public health service, Monash Health. Jefferies’ statement of claim, recently lodged with the court, accuses all three of falling short of delivering professional standards of care, including those outlined by the widely recognised World Professional Association for Transgender Health. The claim says those standards require doctors to ensure that “anyone experiencing mental health conditions must have these well-managed and thoroughly controlled prior to the commencement of the testosterone treatment”. Jefferies says her years of mental health issues were not under control at the time of her treatment and were exacerbated by the testosterone prescribed by her doctors and surgery. Her statement of claim says she has a permanently “deepened voice, hirsutism, clitoromegaly [a clitoris significantly larger than normal], vaginal pain/discomfort, abnormal body odour and acne, and pelvic floor dysfunction (as indicated by urinary incontinence).” Under Australia’s current model of transgender treatment, known as “affirming care”, people’s gender identity is “affirmed and supported” when it conflicts with the gender they were assigned at birth. “For years I just kept getting affirmed by the medical fraternity and the trans community for something I wasn’t,” Jefferies told this masthead. “They kept telling me, ‘You’re non-binary, trans, maybe you’re non-binary’. I tried to pull away but they just kept pulling me back in … I never developed the discernment to say ‘this isn’t true’.” If Jefferies’ case proceeds to a judicial decision, it could represent a test case for the duty of care doctors owe towards people seeking affirming care. It comes as the number of young people seeking treatment for gender dysphoria has increased dramatically in the past decade.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
As Mel’s gender ‘ricocheted’, she went under a surgeon’s knife
A woman is suing the doctors who performed her gender treatment, claiming she could not have given informed consent.
Michael Bachelard - MAY 24, 2025
1/3
A young woman who thought for years she was non-binary or a transgender man is suing two doctors and Monash Health for negligence, claiming gender treatment that included having both breasts surgically removed had caused her “significant injury”.
Mel Jefferies, a 33-year-old who was born as female and is now living again as a woman, has launched the civil lawsuit in the Victorian County Court.
One of the defendants in the case is Dr Jeff Willcox, a Melbourne GP with an “interest in gay men’s health, sexual health ... and transgender health”. The others are Jaco Erasmus, a psychiatrist with a special interest in transgender health, and Victoria’s largest public health service, Monash Health.
Jefferies’ statement of claim, recently lodged with the court, accuses all three of falling short of delivering professional standards of care, including those outlined by the widely recognised World Professional Association for Transgender Health. The claim says those standards require doctors to ensure that “anyone experiencing mental health conditions must have these well-managed and thoroughly controlled prior to the commencement of the testosterone treatment”.
Jefferies says her years of mental health issues were not under control at the time of her treatment and were exacerbated by the testosterone prescribed by her doctors and surgery.
Her statement of claim says she has a permanently “deepened voice, hirsutism, clitoromegaly [a clitoris significantly larger than normal], vaginal pain/discomfort, abnormal body odour and acne, and pelvic floor dysfunction (as indicated by urinary incontinence).”
Under Australia’s current model of transgender treatment, known as “affirming care”, people’s gender identity is “affirmed and supported” when it conflicts with the gender they were assigned at birth.
“For years I just kept getting affirmed by the medical fraternity and the trans community for something I wasn’t,” Jefferies told this masthead.
“They kept telling me, ‘You’re non-binary, trans, maybe you’re non-binary’. I tried to pull away but they just kept pulling me back in … I never developed the discernment to say ‘this isn’t true’.”
Her case, filed by Slater and Gordon solicitor Anne Shortall, is one of the few brought in Australia by people who regret their gender treatment. Another is working its way through the courts in Sydney. Shortall declined to comment.
If Jefferies’ case proceeds to a judicial decision, it could represent a test case for the duty of care doctors owe towards people seeking affirming care. It comes as the number of young people seeking treatment for gender dysphoria has increased dramatically in the past decade.
It also comes as the transgender community and doctors who perform such treatments push for an “informed consent” model of care which would reduce the barriers to treatment, including the requirement for psychological assessments. They also want GPs to be able to treat gender issues as they do more common conditions.
Monash declined to comment as the case was before the courts and involved “confidential patient information”. Questions to Willcox were answered by his lawyer, who said he would defend the claim. Erasmus said he could not comment because the matter was before the court.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73537
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23079989 (251004ZMAY25) Notable: Taylor, Tehan and Paterson set for security roles in Ley’s top team - Sussan Ley and David Littleproud have agreed that the Nationals will receive six shadow cabinet spots and two outer ministry positions as part of negotiations on a Coalition frontbench that is expected to see Ms Ley’s Liberal rival, Angus Taylor, receive the foreign affairs or defence portfolio. After a tumultuous week that resulted in the Liberal and Nationals leaders poised to announce separate ministries as late as Thursday morning, Ms Ley and Mr Littleproud restarted talks on a Coalition agreement at the weekend and are expected to come to a position on the shadow ministry and policies such as nuclear energy in coming days. While Ms Ley reached out to former Nationals leaders Michael McCormack and Barnaby Joyce to broker a resolution to the split before Mr Littleproud agreed to renegotiate, neither MP expects to receive a frontbench position thanks to their roles in fuelling Nationals leadership speculation in recent days. “Barnaby (Joyce) and I will still contribute if we’re not selected in that leadership team. And who knows, we’ll probably be sitting up the back together,” Mr McCormack said. Despite suggestions within the Nationals that Mr Littleproud would not remain leader in “the long term” after his decision to split from the Coalition and then backflip on that decision, Mr Littleproud on Sunday said he was “relaxed” about his position. “The vast majority of my partyroom decided to leave the Coalition. I enacted what was directed,” he said on Sky News.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73523
>>73529
>>73533
Taylor, Tehan and Paterson set for security roles in Ley’s top team
SARAH ISON - 25 May 2025
Sussan Ley and David Littleproud have agreed that the Nationals will receive six shadow cabinet spots and two outer ministry positions as part of negotiations on a Coalition frontbench that is expected to see Ms Ley’s Liberal rival, Angus Taylor, receive the foreign affairs or defence portfolio.
After a tumultuous week that resulted in the Liberal and Nationals leaders poised to announce separate ministries as late as Thursday morning, Ms Ley and Mr Littleproud restarted talks on a Coalition agreement at the weekend and are expected to come to a position on the shadow ministry and policies such as nuclear energy in coming days.
While Ms Ley reached out to former Nationals leaders Michael McCormack and Barnaby Joyce to broker a resolution to the split before Mr Littleproud agreed to renegotiate, neither MP expects to receive a frontbench position thanks to their roles in fuelling Nationals leadership speculation in recent days.
“Barnaby (Joyce) and I will still contribute if you know, we’re not selected in that leadership team. And who knows, we’ll probably be sitting up the back together,” Mr McCormack said.
The unlikely alliance comes after Mr Joyce rolled Mr McCormack as leader in 2021.
Despite suggestions within the Nationals that Mr Littleproud would not remain leader in “the long term” after his decision to split from the Coalition and then backflip on that decision, Mr Littleproud on Sunday said he was “relaxed” about his position.
“The vast majority of my partyroom decided to leave the Coalition. I enacted what was directed,” he said on Sky News.
“We got an outcome over two or three days because of principles over politics … If I have to lose my job for it, I don’t care, but I did what my partyroom said.”
Mr Littleproud’s chosen deputy leader, Kevin Hogan, also sought to brush aside leadership questions.
“He did it all in line with the partyroom’s procedures and processes, and I think they have great respect for that,” he told ABC. “There are always malcontents in any room.”
Nationals and Liberal sources familiar with negotiations over a Coalition said while the question of cabinet spots may have been up for debate before the Coalition nearly split, the matter was now very much settled.
“The Nationals will get six (cabinet) spots and two outer ministries,” one senior Nationals MP said.
The Australian understands Ms Ley had invited Michaelia Cash and Anne Ruston – the Liberals’ leader and deputy leader of the Senate – along with her deputy Ted O’Brien to Canberra on Thursday, before talks on the Coalition were restarted.
Several conservative Liberals raised concern with the position Ms Ley would give Mr Taylor, who lost the battle for Liberal leadership by just four votes and said only the foreign affairs or defence portfolio offered “sufficient” status.
Senior Liberal MP James Paterson is expected to take whichever role Mr Taylor didn’t want; Dan Tehan is predicted to be offered home affairs as a “natural next step” from his former job of immigration spokesman.
Despite Nationals MPs like Bridget McKenzie arguing for the junior party to be given shadow cabinet roles that allowed for a greater say in economic policy, there are no major changes expected to the usual breakup of roles that sees the Nationals take on portfolios such as resources.
While the Liberal partyroom agreed to Mr Littleproud’s four policy demands, which went to nuclear energy, supermarket divestiture laws, resolving telecommunication black spots and investing in regional Australia, some concerns remain over the issue of nuclear and divestiture in particular.
Liberal senator Andrew Bragg said while the Liberals could agree to a “technology-agnostic” approach to energy policy that left room for nuclear to be explored, there were definitely risks around implementing divestiture laws.
“You wouldn’t want to do anything that was going to damage private investment because it’s on strike under this government,” Senator Bragg told Sky News.
https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/taylor-tehan-and-paterson-set-for-security-roles-in-leys-top-team/news-story/5a682e59b63af8e71e643c779e73dadd
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73538
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23079997 (251023ZMAY25) Notable: OPINION: Roberts-Smith’s rabid band of supporters has an outspoken new member - Gina Rinehart - "“What went on over there, stays over there.” - “You can’t judge combat from the comfort of an armchair.” - “What right have you to tear down our heroes?” - “It’s war, for god’s sake.” - Since the first public challenges to Victoria Cross recipient Ben Roberts-Smith’s reputation in 2017, those words, this retaliatory refrain, has been unrelenting and unchanged. All in the face of profound evidence revealing Australia’s most decorated living soldier is a war criminal. After last week’s 245-page rejection of Roberts-Smith’s Federal Court appeal and Justice Anthony Besanko’s 726-page ruling in 2023, the keen eyes of four judges have now found to a civil court standard that Roberts-Smith murdered four captives in Afghanistan. Under the Geneva Convention and Australia’s own laws of armed conflict, executing detainees is unlawful. But there are rules and there are norms, and the norms according to the “it’s war” apologists are based on an insiders’ “take no prisoners” realpolitik. Within the Defence diaspora, online debate runs hot and loud. The “I stand with Ben” brigade is undeterred by the court rulings. Brigadier Adrian d’Hage, former head of Defence public relations who was awarded a Military Cross for his service in Vietnam, is taking them on. And he’s far from alone among soldiers with combat experience disavowing the so-called realists’ justification for murder. “That is not the way we fight. We have a long and hard-won reputation as being feared fighters, but fighters who engage according to the Geneva Convention,” d’Hage says. Billionaire Kerry Stokes has spent millions on Roberts-Smith’s case. Multi-millionaire John Singleton funded a full-page newspaper advertisement describing attacks on the war hero as “disgraceful”. And now Australia’s richest person, Gina Rinehart, is quoted querying why this “brave and patriotic man” should be “under such attack”. I can only wonder what is in their minds. Do they believe that in their real world, ruthlessness is a necessity that should be honoured?" - Chris Masters, Gold Walkley award-winning journalist and the first Australian journalist to be embedded with special forces in Afghanistan - theage.com.au
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73512
>>73531
OPINION: Roberts-Smith’s rabid band of supporters has an outspoken new member – Gina Rinehart
Roberts-Smith is a murderer. Why do the uber-wealthy defend him?
Chris Masters, Investigative journalist - May 25, 2025
1/2
“What went on over there, stays over there.”
“You can’t judge combat from the comfort of an armchair.”
“What right have you to tear down our heroes?”
“It’s war, for god’s sake.”
Since the first public challenges to Victoria Cross recipient Ben Roberts-Smith’s reputation in 2017, those words, this retaliatory refrain, has been unrelenting and unchanged. All in the face of profound evidence revealing Australia’s most decorated living soldier is a war criminal.
After last week’s 245-page rejection of Roberts-Smith’s Federal Court appeal and Justice Anthony Besanko’s 726-page ruling in 2023, the keen eyes of four judges have now found to a civil court standard that Roberts-Smith murdered four captives in Afghanistan.
Under the Geneva Convention and Australia’s own laws of armed conflict, executing detainees is unlawful. But there are rules and there are norms, and the norms according to the “it’s war” apologists are based on an insiders’ “take no prisoners” realpolitik.
Within the Defence diaspora, online debate runs hot and loud. The “I stand with Ben” brigade is undeterred by the court rulings.
Brigadier Adrian d’Hage, former head of Defence public relations who was awarded a Military Cross for his service in Vietnam, is taking them on. And he’s far from alone among soldiers with combat experience disavowing the so-called realists’ justification for murder.
“That is not the way we fight. We have a long and hard-won reputation as being feared fighters, but fighters who engage according to the Geneva Convention,” d’Hage says.
Given many critics’ apparent aversion to examining those pages, here is a distillation of key evidence.
On April 13, 2009, Ben Roberts-Smith kicked an old man to his knees and instructed a junior soldier, in an exercise of “blooding”, to shoot him in the head. Soon after, he frogmarched a second Afghan man fitted with a prosthetic leg, threw him to the ground, and killed him with a burst of machine gun fire.
On October 12, 2012, a third unarmed and detained man was executed by an Afghan partner force member upon Roberts-Smith’s instruction.
And on November 11, 2012, Ali Jan, a father of three with no established links to the Taliban, was handcuffed and kicked over a small cliff by Roberts-Smith, who then ordered two comrades to drag him to cover, where he was shot dead.
At numerous speaking events, Age investigative journalist Nick McKenzie and I have argued the following:
It is morally wrong to kill or order the execution of captives.
It is strategically wrong because it turns the population further against your mission. All those Australian soldiers bravely patrolling the fields of Uruzgan as a protective force against the Taliban were placed at greater risk.
And it is wrong to force an act upon a fellow soldier so destructive of conscience and self-respect.
Soldiers who have earned the Special Air Service Regiment’s sandy beret are rightly proud. When they returned to civilian life as psychological wrecks because of what they saw and did, as did occur, the damage was obvious.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73539
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23080001 (251029ZMAY25) Notable: Video: Footage released of Qld man feared dead in Ukraine - Ukraine’s Ambassador to Australia has released footage of the Queenslander feared dead in “Russian-controlled territory”, offering a glimpse into his efforts during the war. Gladstone builder, Caleb List, joined the Ukrainian foreign legion after he was rejected by the Australian Army. It is understood Mr List went missing and is believed to have been killed following fighting in the Kharkiv region last month. The YouTube video, posted by Ambassador of Ukraine to Australia, Vasul Myroshnychenko on Saturday, offered a glimpse into Mr List’s life on the Ukrainian front lines, where he had been fighting since 2022. At the start of the video, Mr List talks to the camera, stating, “It’s a good fight. It’s a necessary fight, so that is why I am here in the cold freezing my arse off”. A montage of photos and snippets of his efforts with the Ukrainian Army follows, including videos of Mr List during training exercises, working on the ground, and joking with fellow soldiers. The caption for the YouTube video read that it would be “known for certain” whether Mr List was dead once his body, which remained in Russian-controlled territory, could be recovered and identified. “For now, I ask you to remember Caleb. If he is alive, we will work on getting him swapped,” the caption read. “If he is dead, we will mourn him and will never forget his ultimate sacrifice.”
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73507
Footage released of Qld man feared dead in Ukraine
Ukraine’s Ambassador to Australia has released footage of the Queenslander feared dead in “Russian-controlled territory”, offering a glimpse into his efforts during the war.
Isabella Pesch - May 25, 2025
Ukraine’s Ambassador to Australia has released footage of the Queenslander feared dead in “Russian-controlled territory”, offering a glimpse into his efforts during the war.
Gladstone builder, Caleb List, joined the Ukrainian foreign legion after he was rejected by the Australian Army.
It is understood Mr List went missing and is believed to have been killed following fighting in the Kharkiv region last month.
The YouTube video, posted by Ambassador of Ukraine to Australia, Vasul Myroshnychenko on Saturday, offered a glimpse into Mr List’s life on the Ukrainian front lines, where he had been fighting since 2022.
At the start of the video, Mr List talks to the camera, stating, “It’s a good fight. It’s a necessary fight, so that is why I am here in the cold freezing my arse off”.
A montage of photos and snippets of his efforts with the Ukrainian Army follows, including videos of Mr List during training exercises, working on the ground, and joking with fellow soldiers.
The caption for the YouTube video read that it would be “known for certain” whether Mr List was dead once his body, which remained in Russian-controlled territory, could be recovered and identified.
“For now, I ask you to remember Caleb. If he is alive, we will work on getting him swapped,” the caption read.
“If he is dead, we will mourn him and will never forget his ultimate sacrifice.”
A Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade spokesperson said they were aware of people attempting to travel to fight in the war, and a small number of Australians were reported as missing or deceased in Ukraine.
“We continue to strongly urge Australians not to travel to Ukraine. It is a ‘do not travel’ zone because the situation is extremely dangerous,” the spokesperson said.
The Australian Government’s travel advice for Ukraine remained at “Do not travel due to the volatile security environment and military conflict”. The travel advice for Ukraine was last updated on March 27 and remains current.
https://www.couriermail.com.au/news/queensland/footage-released-of-qld-man-feared-dead-in-ukraine/news-story/cb6cdf8a579ef2c59645e15d50ab6858
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U7nsS3A2tC8
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73540
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23080024 (251051ZMAY25) Notable: Virginia Giuffre: Jeffrey Epstein survivor farewelled in private in Perth - Virginia Giuffre - a high-profile survivor of billionaire paedophile Jeffrey Epstein who alleged she was sex trafficked to Prince Andrew - has been farewelled by her family in Perth. Ms Giuffre, 41, is believed to have taken her own life at her farm in Neergabby, about 80km north of Perth, last month. The West Australian understands Ms Giuffre was cremated in recent days at Pinnaroo Valley Memorial Park in Padbury. Ms Giuffre’s death attracted worldwide headlines, but it is understood she was farewelled in private, with no funeral being publicly advertised. WA Police confirmed at the weekend that officers have concluded her death is not being treated as suspicious. Major crime detectives are in the process of preparing a report to give to the coroner. Police were called to Ms Giuffre’s property about 9.50pm on April 25 after she was found unresponsive. There was nothing that could be done to save her, and she was declared dead at the scene. Her death came less than a month after she posted to social media that she had just “four days to live” after a crash with a school bus near her home, which police later dismissed as a minor incident. Ms Giuffre shot to prominence in 2015 after filing a lawsuit in a New York court against Epstein’s longtime companion and confidante, Ghislaine Maxwell, alleging the pair kept her as a “sex slave” for the rich and powerful. She said she was recruited by Maxwell when she was 16 or 17 and working at Mar-a-Lago, Donald Trump’s club in Palm Beach. Ms Giuffre told the BBC in 2019 she was “passed around like a platter of fruit” to Epstein’s friends, flown around the world on private jets. Prince Andrew was among those powerful friends, and she claimed she was forced to have sex with him when she was 17. He strongly denies the allegations. A now-infamous photograph shows him arm-in-arm with Ms Giuffre yet in a television interview with the BBC, he said he had no memory of meeting her. When she died, Ms Giuffre was facing a charge of breaching a family violence restraining order taken out by her estranged husband, Robert Giuffre. The charge was discontinued earlier this month, with a court told the allegation related to claims she sent Mr Giuffre several text messages. The former couple moved to Perth from Cairns in 2020, buying a $1.9m six-bedroom, four-bathroom ocean-front property in Ocean Reef with her husband, Robert. Ms Giuffre left behind three children - Christian, Noah and Emily. Her family said holding her newborn daughter had inspired her to “fight back against those who had abused her and so many others”. “She was heroic and will always be remembered for her incredible courage and loving spirit,” they said. “In the end, the toll of abuse is so heavy that it became unbearable for Virginia to handle its weight.”
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73395
>>73499
Virginia Giuffre: Jeffrey Epstein survivor farewelled in private in Perth
Shannon Hampton - 25 May 2025
Virginia Giuffre - a high-profile survivor of billionaire paedophile Jeffrey Epstein who alleged she was sex trafficked to Prince Andrew - has been farewelled by her family in Perth.
Ms Giuffre, 41, is believed to have taken her own life at her farm in Neergabby, about 80km north of Perth, last month.
The West Australian understands Ms Giuffre was cremated in recent days at Pinnaroo Valley Memorial Park in Padbury.
Ms Giuffre’s death attracted worldwide headlines, but it is understood she was farewelled in private, with no funeral being publicly advertised.
WA Police confirmed at the weekend that officers have concluded her death is not being treated as suspicious. Major crime detectives are in the process of preparing a report to give to the coroner.
Police were called to Ms Giuffre’s property about 9.50pm on April 25 after she was found unresponsive. There was nothing that could be done to save her, and she was declared dead at the scene.
Her death came less than a month after she posted to social media that she had just “four days to live” after a crash with a school bus near her home, which police later dismissed as a minor incident.
Ms Giuffre shot to prominence in 2015 after filing a lawsuit in a New York court against Epstein’s longtime companion and confidante, Ghislaine Maxwell, alleging the pair kept her as a “sex slave” for the rich and powerful.
She said she was recruited by Maxwell when she was 16 or 17 and working at Mar-a-Lago, Donald Trump’s club in Palm Beach.
Ms Giuffre told the BBC in 2019 she was “passed around like a platter of fruit” to Epstein’s friends, flown around the world on private jets.
Prince Andrew was among those powerful friends, and she claimed she was forced to have sex with him when she was 17. He strongly denies the allegations.
A now-infamous photograph shows him arm-in-arm with Ms Giuffre yet in a television interview with the BBC, he said he had no memory of meeting her.
When she died, Ms Giuffre was facing a charge of breaching a family violence restraining order taken out by her estranged husband, Robert Giuffre.
The charge was discontinued earlier this month, with a court told the allegation related to claims she sent Mr Giuffre several text messages.
The former couple moved to Perth from Cairns in 2020, buying a $1.9m six-bedroom, four-bathroom ocean-front property in Ocean Reef with her husband, Robert.
Ms Giuffre left behind three children - Christian, Noah and Emily.
Her family said holding her newborn daughter had inspired her to “fight back against those who had abused her and so many others”.
“She was heroic and will always be remembered for her incredible courage and loving spirit,” they said. “In the end, the toll of abuse is so heavy that it became unbearable for Virginia to handle its weight.”
Lifeline: 13 11 14
https://thewest.com.au/news/wa/virginia-giuffre-jeffrey-epstein-survivor-farewelled-in-private-in-perth-c-18799911
—
Q Post #4923
Oct 21 2020 20:55:05 (EST)
https://twitter.com/VRSVirginia/status/1319071346282778624
Dearest Virginia -
We stand with you.
Now and always.
Find peace through prayer.
Never give up the good fight.
God bless you.
Q
https://qanon.pub/#4923
https://qanon.pub/#4568
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73541
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23083142 (260920ZMAY25) Notable: ‘People are starving’: Albanese attacks Israel over ‘outrageous’ Gaza food restrictions - Anthony Albanese is coming under growing internal and international pressure to sanction Israel and recognise Palestinian statehood before a major United Nations conference next month, as the prime minister rounded on the Netanyahu government for limiting the delivery of food and other supplies going into Gaza. Israel last week ended its 11-week blockade of aid entering the ravaged strip but the United Nations and leading international charities argue the trickle of supplies is not nearly enough to meet the demands of Gaza’s 2.3 million people. Australia last week joined 23 other nations to condemn Israel for politicising the delivery of humanitarian aid, but did not sign onto a stronger statement by the United Kingdom, France and Canada warning Israel of sanctions if it did not stop settlement building in the West Bank. The three nations also said they were “committed to recognising a Palestinian state as a contribution to achieving a two-state solution and are prepared to work with others to this end”, as they noted the UN is preparing to hold a high-level conference on a two-state solution. “Israel’s actions are completely unacceptable,” Albanese told reporters on Monday, using some of his most forceful language on the issue in recent times. “It is outrageous that there be a blockade of food and supplies to people who are in need in Gaza. We have made that very clear by signing up to international statements.” Albanese said he had expressed his criticisms directly to Israeli President Isaac Herzog when they met in Rome on the sidelines of Pope Leo’s inauguration mass. “I made it very clear that Australia finds these actions completely unacceptable and we find Israel’s excuses and explanations completely untenable and without credibility,” he said. “People are starving.”
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73526
‘People are starving’: Albanese attacks Israel over ‘outrageous’ Gaza food restrictions
Matthew Knott - May 26, 2025
1/2
Anthony Albanese is coming under growing internal and international pressure to sanction Israel and recognise Palestinian statehood before a major United Nations conference next month, as the prime minister rounded on the Netanyahu government for limiting the delivery of food and other supplies going into Gaza.
Israel last week ended its 11-week blockade of aid entering the ravaged strip but the United Nations and leading international charities argue the trickle of supplies is not nearly enough to meet the demands of Gaza’s 2.3 million people.
Australia last week joined 23 other nations to condemn Israel for politicising the delivery of humanitarian aid, but did not sign onto a stronger statement by the United Kingdom, France and Canada warning Israel of sanctions if it did not stop settlement building in the West Bank.
The three nations also said they were “committed to recognising a Palestinian state as a contribution to achieving a two-state solution and are prepared to work with others to this end”, as they noted the UN is preparing to hold a high-level conference on a two-state solution.
France and Saudi Arabia will co-host the conference, which is scheduled for June 17-20 in New York. French President Emmanuel Macron has been lobbying fellow world leaders to join a unified effort to recognise a Palestinian state, even if it is opposed by Israel.
Australia voted in favour of holding the conference last year in a seven-page resolution calling for the international community to “urgently chart an irreversible pathway towards the peaceful settlement of the question of Palestine and the implementation of the two-state solution”.
“Israel’s actions are completely unacceptable,” Albanese told reporters on Monday, using some of his most forceful language on the issue in recent times.
“It is outrageous that there be a blockade of food and supplies to people who are in need in Gaza. We have made that very clear by signing up to international statements.”
Albanese said he had expressed his criticisms directly to Israeli President Isaac Herzog when they met in Rome on the sidelines of Pope Leo’s inauguration mass.
“I made it very clear that Australia finds these actions completely unacceptable and we find Israel’s excuses and explanations completely untenable and without credibility,” he said.
“People are starving.”
He said Australia did not sign up to the France, Canada and UK stronger comments because it was a G7 statement – even though it did not mention the G7 by name or include the other four G7 nations.
He refused to be drawn on whether his government would recognise Palestinian statehood during this term of government.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73542
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23083147 (260925ZMAY25) Notable: Recount in Goldstein after Wilson’s slim margin prompts request by Daniel - There will be a partial recount of votes in Goldstein to ensure confidence in the result and the counting process after a request was made by independent Zoe Daniel, the Australian Electoral Commission has announced. Liberal Tim Wilson recorded a slim margin of 260 votes ahead of Daniel after the final count finished on Saturday. A spokesman for the AEC said the decision to conduct the recount was made after advice from the national election manager to the electoral commissioner “to ensure the greatest level of confidence in the final result and the utmost integrity in the counting process”. The recount will begin on Wednesday and will take up to four days. Wilson said he was relaxed about the recount. “We have been very relaxed about every count and recount to date in Goldstein, as we know the count will deliver the result that reflects the will of the people of Goldstein,” he said. Daniel said given the corrections picked up in the final stages of the distribution of preferences, the AEC had said it was appropriate and reasonable to do an additional check of first preferences. “Once again, I’d like to thank my scrutineers and AEC staff for their diligence and dedication to the democratic process,” she said. The partial recount will involve a re-examination of all first preference ballot papers for Wilson and Daniel, as well as all informal votes, but the full distribution of preferences will not be recounted. “The recount request submitted by independent candidate Zoe Daniel was carefully considered and was instructive but not determinative, and her request for a full recount has not been granted,” the AEC spokesman said.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73473
>>73477
>>73535
Recount in Goldstein after Wilson’s slim margin prompts request by Daniel
Cara Waters - May 26, 2025
There will be a partial recount of votes in Goldstein to ensure confidence in the result and the counting process after a request was made by independent Zoe Daniel, the Australian Electoral Commission has announced.
Liberal Tim Wilson recorded a slim margin of 260 votes ahead of Daniel after the final count finished on Saturday.
A spokesman for the AEC said the decision to conduct the recount was made after advice from the national election manager to the electoral commissioner “to ensure the greatest level of confidence in the final result and the utmost integrity in the counting process”.
The recount will begin on Wednesday and will take up to four days.
Wilson said he was relaxed about the recount.
“We have been very relaxed about every count and recount to date in Goldstein, as we know the count will deliver the result that reflects the will of the people of Goldstein,” he said.
However, Wilson said he was worried that data scientist Simon Jackman, who has been advising Daniel, has also advised the Labor Party.
“It does not surprise me that it has been revealed the teals have consultants working for them that have also been consulting to Labor, and who have been providing cover to push for this recount,” he said. “I look forward to the conclusion of the partial recount and the declaration of the poll, and thank the AEC staff, all scrutineers and the people of Goldstein.”
Daniel said given the corrections picked up in the final stages of the distribution of preferences, the AEC had said it was appropriate and reasonable to do an additional check of first preferences.
“Once again, I’d like to thank my scrutineers and AEC staff for their diligence and dedication to the democratic process,” she said.
The partial recount will involve a re-examination of all first preference ballot papers for Wilson and Daniel, as well as all informal votes, but the full distribution of preferences will not be recounted.
“The recount request submitted by independent candidate Zoe Daniel was carefully considered and was instructive but not determinative, and her request for a full recount has not been granted,” the AEC spokesman said.
The spokesman said the count for the distribution of preferences highlighted some discrepancies in the fresh scrutiny count for Goldstein.
“The nature of the discrepancies in this case pointed to instances where fresh scrutiny results had been entered into the system incorrectly,” he said. “While the distribution of preferences process enabled these to be rectified for first preference ballot papers for excluded [non-two candidate preferred] candidates, hence the change of margins on a few occasions, it has highlighted a need to re-examine ballot papers not dealt with at distribution of preferences.”
The spokesman said the AEC would not undertake a full recount, which would include repeating the recently completed distribution of preferences.
“We are satisfied that there was a very high degree of rigor throughout the distribution of preferences process,” he said. “Given the corrections picked up on preference votes in the final stages of the distribution of preferences count, it is reasonable and appropriate to do an additional check of first preference papers for the two final candidates (ballot papers not required to be re-reviewed during a distribution of preferences).”
A margin of 100 votes or fewer means there is an automatic recount, but candidates can request one if there are sufficient grounds.
Daniel made a request for a recount on Saturday, “in light of the very tight margin and several errors being picked up in the portion of the count that was included in the distribution of preferences”.
Candidate requests for recounts are rarely granted, with the last undertaken by the AEC in McEwen in 2007.
A recount is also underway in Bradfield in NSW, where the margin was fewer than 100 votes.
The AEC spokesman was unable to say how much the recounts would cost.
https://www.theage.com.au/politics/federal/recount-in-goldstein-after-wilson-s-slim-margin-prompts-request-by-daniel-20250526-p5m28g.html
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73543
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23087084 (270902ZMAY25) Notable: Pro-Voice Liberal says referendum defeat gave the party ‘a false sense of confidence’ - The Coalition’s success in defeating the Voice to parliament referendum gave the Liberal party “a false sense of confidence” about its chances of victory in the federal election, says former shadow attorney-general Julian Leeser, who resigned from his opposition portfolio in 2023 in order to campaign for the referendum. Noting that Prime Minister Anthony Albanese “seemed to lose his way” after the Voice referendum was defeated in all states in October 2023, Leeser told ABC’s Afternoon Briefing that this, combined with Albanese’s poor handling of the local antisemitism crisis, “gave so many in our party a false sense of confidence”. Leeser says he was “shocked” that the internal polling conducted for the Coalition by Freshwater’s Mike Turner used the number of Labor voters who voted no in the referendum in his calculations of a swing against the government, which was instead returned in a landslide and is likely to end up with 94 seats, equalling John Howard’s record in 1996. “On one level, there is nothing wrong with trying to target those Labor voters who voted no in the referendum campaign,” he said, saying Howard targeted those who rejected the republic proposal in 1999, but only to remind them of other issues such as border security. “I thought it was very strange there was such a focus even on the campaign itself,” Leeser said. “Part of the reason my colleagues were successfully defeating the referendum was in 2023 the issue did not seem to be one of top priority for Australian voters. Certainly, in 2025, it was completely irrelevant and I had no idea why the issue kept reappearing in our campaign.” Leeser said he was “completely surprised” by the focus in the last week on Welcome to Country and the Voice. “It indicated we were not in touch with the concerns of ordinary Australians. People were not talking to me about those issues until we raised them; they were concerned about paying the electricity bills, their mortgage, about the future of their children and what sort of jobs they would have in a world where AI will present both threats and opportunities. We were not talking about any of those enough, and instead focused on esoteric issues and I think it indicated a lack of discipline and real focus.”
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73455
>>73435
Pro-Voice Liberal says referendum defeat gave the party ‘a false sense of confidence’
Michelle Griffin - May 26, 2025
The Coalition’s success in defeating the Voice to parliament referendum gave the Liberal party “a false sense of confidence” about its chances of victory in the federal election, says former shadow attorney-general Julian Leeser, who resigned from his opposition portfolio in 2023 in order to campaign for the referendum.
Noting that Prime Minister Anthony Albanese “seemed to lose his way” after the Voice referendum was defeated in all states in October 2023, Leeser told ABC’s Afternoon Briefing that this, combined with Albanese’s poor handling of the local antisemitism crisis, “gave so many in our party a false sense of confidence”.
Leeser says he was “shocked” that the internal polling conducted for the Coalition by Freshwater’s Mike Turner used the number of Labor voters who voted no in the referendum in his calculations of a swing against the government, which was instead returned in a landslide and is likely to end up with 94 seats, equalling John Howard’s record in 1996.
“On one level, there is nothing wrong with trying to target those Labor voters who voted no in the referendum campaign,” he said, saying Howard targeted those who rejected the republic proposal in 1999, but only to remind them of other issues such as border security.
“I thought it was very strange there was such a focus even on the campaign itself,” Leeser said.
“Part of the reason my colleagues were successfully defeating the referendum was in 2023 the issue did not seem to be one of top priority for Australian voters. Certainly, in 2025, it was completely irrelevant and I had no idea why the issue kept reappearing in our campaign.”
While former opposition leader Peter Dutton regularly raised the Voice as one of several examples to demonstrate that Labor was out of touch, he campaigned in the final days of the campaign on the claim that the government had a “secret plan to legislate the Voice” after Foreign Minister Penny Wong told the Betoota Talks podcast that she thought “we’ll look back on it in 10 years’ time and it’ll be a bit like marriage equality”.
Albanese ruled out bringing back the Voice and accused Dutton of “verballing” Wong.
Leeser said he was “completely surprised” by the focus in the last week on Welcome to Country and the Voice.
“It indicated we were not in touch with the concerns of ordinary Australians. People were not talking to me about those issues until we raised them; they were concerned about paying the electricity bills, their mortgage, about the future of their children and what sort of jobs they would have in a world where AI will present both threats and opportunities.
“We were not talking about any of those enough, and instead focused on esoteric issues and I think it indicated a lack of discipline and real focus.”
Leeser held his north Sydney seat of Berowra despite a 5.9 per cent swing to Labor. Dutton brought the former lawyer back to his front bench in January as assistant foreign affairs minister after Leeser, who is Jewish, proved a staunch campaigner on antisemitism issues. There is speculation within the Coalition that he could return to the shadow legal affairs portfolio under Opposition Leader Sussan Ley.
Senator Jacinta Nampijinpa Price, who was the face of the No campaign, is expected to lose her “government efficiency” role in the reshuffle because of its Trumpian overtones, but she may have a different portfolio.
https://www.theage.com.au/politics/federal/pro-voice-liberal-says-referendum-defeat-gave-the-party-a-false-sense-of-confidence-20250526-p5m2da.html
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73544
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23087088 (270908ZMAY25) Notable: AUKUS in space: Scott Morrison proposes ‘Pillar 3’ for defence pact - Scott Morrison - the founder of the landmark AUKUS agreement – has proposed taking the security partnership into the space domain to bolster its effectiveness as a military deterrent and make Australia a more valuable ally. The former prime minister said he would support a new AUKUS “Pillar 3” aimed at helping Australia develop a stronger space capability that could complement US, Japanese, as well as European and UK systems. This would bolster deterrence, with Mr Morrison noting that space was “now a frontline in US-China strategic rivalry.” But he also said it would send a valuable signal to the private sector about the important role it had to play. “The blurred lines between civil and military domains created by the dual use space technologies makes this even more challenging to contest,” he said. AUKUS - the trilateral security partnership between Australia, the UK and the US – offered a chance to harness the power of the private sector in the space domain to “deliver strategic advantage over potential adversaries.” In a speech to the 2025 Australian Space Summit in Darling Harbour on Tuesday, Mr Morrison said that “Australia can and must stand out as a rising actor with the potential to plug important holes in allied capabilities.” He warned that China was “advancing, especially in satellite manoeuvrability, launch, and spaceplane tech,” while Russia was “reportedly developing a space-based nuclear anti-satellite weapon.” As space became “more enmeshed in geopolitical rivalry,” Mr Morrison said the allied network needed to function as a “cohesive whole, just as it has in all other domains for decades.” “By 2030, with deliberate development, Australia can offer unique contributions: southern-hemisphere sensors watching the skies, a strategic location for space operations, and additional resilient satellites and launch options,” he said.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73432
AUKUS in space: Scott Morrison proposes ‘Pillar 3’ for defence pact
JOE KELLY - 27 May 2025
Scott Morrison – the founder of the landmark AUKUS agreement – has proposed taking the security partnership into the space domain to bolster its effectiveness as a military deterrent and make Australia a more valuable ally.
The former prime minister said he would support a new AUKUS “Pillar 3” aimed at helping Australia develop a stronger space capability that could complement US, Japanese, as well as European and UK systems.
This would bolster deterrence, with Mr Morrison noting that space was “now a frontline in US-China strategic rivalry.” But he also said it would send a valuable signal to the private sector about the important role it had to play.
“The blurred lines between civil and military domains created by the dual use space technologies makes this even more challenging to contest,” he said.
AUKUS – the trilateral security partnership between Australia, the UK and the US – offered a chance to harness the power of the private sector in the space domain to “deliver strategic advantage over potential adversaries.”
In a speech to the 2025 Australian Space Summit in Darling Harbour on Tuesday, Mr Morrison said that “Australia can and must stand out as a rising actor with the potential to plug important holes in allied capabilities.”
He warned that China was “advancing, especially in satellite manoeuvrability, launch, and spaceplane tech,” while Russia was “reportedly developing a space-based nuclear anti-satellite weapon.”
As space became “more enmeshed in geopolitical rivalry,” Mr Morrison said the allied network needed to function as a “cohesive whole, just as it has in all other domains for decades.”
“By 2030, with deliberate development, Australia can offer unique contributions: southern-hemisphere sensors watching the skies, a strategic location for space operations, and additional resilient satellites and launch options,” he said.
“An allied operation in the Indo-Pacific in 2030 could count on Australian satellites for communications and surveillance, Australian sensors to warn of enemy ASAT (anti-satellite weapon) moves, and even Australian launch pads to rapidly deploy new assets,” he said.
“All of this augments the strengths of the US, Japan, and Europe/UK, creating a more robust collective space posture that deters aggression.”
Mr Morrison said that a “strong argument can also be made that such initiatives could form the basis of Australia’s contribution to a new Pillar 3 for AUKUS which, as its founder, I would strongly support.”
The AUKUS agreement – unveiled in September 2021 – has two main pillars. The first would help Australia acquire its own fleet of conventionally armed, nuclear powered submarines. The second allows for the development and sharing of highly advanced technologies and capabilities between the UK, the US and Australia.
Mr Morrison told The Australian in 2024 that Pillar 2 was the “reason for AUKUS” – to create “a single defence industrial base ecosystem between the three jurisdictions (US, UK and Australia) where there’s less regulation, there’s greater integration, there’s more innovation”.
Speaking just weeks after the 2025 election result in Australia, Mr Morrison said on Tuesday that it was important for both sides of politics to “make the strategic case for a bipartisan commitment to space, driven by our national interests – just like intelligence, security and defence.”
The former prime minister has a deep interest in turning Australia into a major player in the space domain. He currently serves as the non-executive chairman of Space Centre Australia which is aiming to open a major international space port in Cape York in Northern Queensland.
Space Centre Australia recently inked its first agreement with NASA for a “horizontal launch capability” allowing a rocket to be deployed in mid air from a C-130 Hercules military transport plane, delivering a payload into a low Earth orbit.
Speaking on Tuesday, Mr Morrison sketched out his vision for “multi user private space port near Weipa,” likening it a “Cape Canaveral at Cape York.”
“There is no other space port in a secure jurisdiction planned or existing, at this scale, closer to the equator,” he said.
In his address on Tuesday, Mr Morrison said that management consulting firm McKinsey had estimated that the global space economy was now worth US$630bn and would grow 9 per cent annually to US$1.8 trillion by 2035 – “double the growth rate of the global economy and faster than semiconductors.”
https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/defence/aukus-in-space-scomo-proposes-pillar-3-for-defence-pact/news-story/b638b9c9109a3508bb6e81cb63a4371c
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73545
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23090691 (281000ZMAY25) Notable: Coalition gets back together after week-long split - The Liberal and National parties have struck a deal to reunify, a week after the Coalition's extraordinary split in the wake of a ruinous election defeat. The ABC has been told a press conference will be held later today, and that frontbench positions are being allocated. Nationals Leader David Littleproud announced last Tuesday that his party would be ending the Coalition Agreement with the Liberals over four policy issues the party demanded be kept. Days later, the Liberal Party agreed in principle not to include those policies - nuclear power, a Regional Australia Future Fund, break-up powers for the supermarket sector and better mobile coverage in the bush — in a sweeping review of the Coalition's election loss. The Liberals and Nationals will not pursue their election commitment to build seven nuclear power plants, but will continue to push to lift the national ban on nuclear power. The parties have also negotiated a position on three other election commitments: to introduce divestiture powers that could be used to break up supermarket and hardware store chains found to be abusing their market power, a $20 billion future fund that could be drawn down on to pay for regional services and infrastructure, and minimum broadband speeds of at least 25Mbs and basic mobile service requirements for regional and rural Australia.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73523
>>73529
>>73533
Coalition gets back together after week-long split
Jake Evans - 28 May 2025
The Liberal and National parties have struck a deal to reunify, a week after the Coalition's extraordinary split in the wake of a ruinous election defeat.
The ABC has been told a press conference will be held later today, and that frontbench positions are being allocated.
Nationals Leader David Littleproud announced last Tuesday that his party would be ending the Coalition Agreement with the Liberals over four policy issues the party demanded be kept.
Days later, the Liberal Party agreed in principle not to include those policies — nuclear power, a Regional Australia Future Fund, break-up powers for the supermarket sector and better mobile coverage in the bush — in a sweeping review of the Coalition's election loss.
Some senior Liberals told the ABC that the Coalition split could give the party "breathing space" on its policy, with a view the Liberal brand had been damaged in the cities.
The Liberal Party has lost as many as 13 seats at an election where it had expected to gain seats.
Reunification draws line under days of infighting
The split has led to days of infighting and jostling between the parties.
In contention was also a claim that Mr Littleproud demanded the Nationals be free to breach cabinet solidarity and be allowed to speak out against policies they disagreed with, which Ms Ley flatly refused.
The opposition leader initially did not want to rule out any policies from a total review of the Coalition's election loss.
But Mr Littleproud said his party would not "blink" on its four policy demands, and repeated over the weekend that he was proud to stand up for Nationals principles and deliver the message to Ms Ley that his party had voted to leave.
The Liberals and Nationals will not pursue their election commitment to build seven nuclear power plants, but will continue to push to lift the national ban on nuclear power.
The parties have also negotiated a position on three other election commitments: to introduce divestiture powers that could be used to break up supermarket and hardware store chains found to be abusing their market power, a $20 billion future fund that could be drawn down on to pay for regional services and infrastructure, and minimum broadband speeds of at least 25Mbs and basic mobile service requirements for regional and rural Australia.
Internally, however, leadership questions have roiled within the Nationals, with the party leader openly saying on Sunday that if the cost of taking a stand would be that he lost his job, so be it.
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-05-28/coalition-gets-back-together-after-week-long-split/105346446
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73546
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23090698 (281006ZMAY25) Notable: Jane Hume dumped, Jacinta Nampijinpa Price demoted in Sussan Ley’s new shadow cabinet - Sussan Ley has dumped work-from-the-office policy architect Jane Hume from shadow cabinet and demoted conservative stalwart Jacinta Nampijinpa Price in a major refresh of her depleted Coalition team. After repairing the Coalition deal following a week of chaos on Wednesday, the Opposition Leader and Nationals leader David Littleproud announced a new opposition frontbench in Canberra. Senator Hume was the highest-profile casualty of the shuffle, losing a position on the frontbench altogether. The Victorian had suffered significant backlash within Coalition ranks after her push to get public servants to stop working from home was successfully weaponised by Labor, and her comments claiming “Chinese spies” could be working on polling booths went viral. After Senator Hume supported Angus Taylor in the Liberal leadership ballot, Ms Ley claimed she had a big future ahead of her, despite having just removed her entirely from the frontbench. Senator Price, who abandoned the Nationals for the Liberals in a failed run for the latter’s deputy leadership, has been pushed to the outer shadow ministry and will be the spokeswoman for defence personnel.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73545
Jane Hume dumped, Jacinta Nampijinpa Price demoted in Sussan Ley’s new shadow cabinet
SARAH ISON - 28 May 2025
Sussan Ley has dumped work-from-the-office policy architect Jane Hume from shadow cabinet and demoted conservative stalwart Jacinta Nampijinpa Price in a major refresh of her depleted Coalition team.
After repairing the Coalition deal following a week of chaos on Wednesday, the Opposition Leader and Nationals leader David Littleproud announced a new opposition frontbench in Canberra.
Senator Hume was the highest-profile casualty of the shuffle, losing a position on the frontbench altogether.
The Victorian had suffered significant backlash within Coalition ranks after her push to get public servants to stop working from home was successfully weaponised by Labor, and her comments claiming “Chinese spies” could be working on polling booths went viral.
After Senator Hume supported Angus Taylor in the Liberal leadership ballot, Ms Ley claimed she had a big future ahead of her, despite having just removed her entirely from the frontbench.
“These are tough days, and having been through many days like this myself in my parliamentary career, I recognise that,” Ms Ley said in Canberra.
“But what I want to say about Jane Hume is she is an enormously talented, fantastic member of this team, who has contributed amazingly over her political career, will continue to do so and is a strong performer across a range of different subject areas.”
Senator Price, who abandoned the Nationals for the Liberals in a failed run for the latter’s deputy leadership, has been pushed to the outer shadow ministry and will be the spokeswoman for defence personnel.
Top roles in Ms Ley’s new shadow cabinet include deputy Liberal leader Ted O’Brien as treasury spokesman, Angus Taylor taking on Deputy Prime Minister Richard Marles in defence, James Paterson going to finance, and Michaelia Cash taking on foreign affairs.
Berowra MP Julian Leeser returns to shadow cabinet as opposition attorney-general spokesman, after leaving Peter Dutton’s frontbench over his support for the Indigenous voice to parliament referendum.
Ms Ley’s numbers man Alex Hawke was rewarded with the industry portfolio.
Senator Claire Chandler and Senator Sarah Henderson have been dumped from shadow cabinet, too.
The Liberals and the Nationals reformed the Coalition just days after a brief split, after Mr Littleproud got approval from his party on Wednesday morning on the revised set of policies he made conditions on rejoining with the Liberals.
The Australian understands the revisions included caveats, such as an assurance that the $20bn regional investment would be distributed equitably and that Ms Ley and Mr Littleproud also discussed smaller administrative details of the deal.
The Nationals leader convened his colleagues on Wednesday morning for a virtual meeting on Ms Ley’s revisions and a final tick-off on the Coalition agreement.
After the meeting, Mr Littleproud contacted Ms Ley to confirm the agreement could be formally made and shadow ministers announced.
Many Nationals MPs have expressed disquiet over the way the negotiations were handled, with former Nationals leader Barnaby Joyce declaring the saga had been “a shocker”, while Colin Boyce said Mr Littleproud had misled partyroom.
“How can you support a bloke that misleads the partyroom? I’m calling him out,” Mr Boyce told Sky News. “I can’t do it. You take these four policies that David took to the first meeting with Sussan Ley, again, none of that has come through the partyroom. It wasn’t discussed.”
Mr Boyce was one of a number of MPs who told The Australian Mr Littleproud should have gone to partyroom before calling a meeting with Ms Ley, during which he put the need for policies to be committed to by the Liberals and shadow cabinet solidarity to be revised.
https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/coalition-back-together-after-nats-tick-off-on-liberals-revisions-to-their-policy-demands/news-story/8e6a15861165fe19088ee611407695e7
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73547
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23090699 (281011ZMAY25) Notable: Tesla wins council approval for new factory in South Australia despite vocal anti-Musk sentiment - Elon Musk’s Tesla is one step closer to opening a factory in Adelaide despite overwhelming community opposition expressing “anti-Tesla and anti-Elon Musk sentiment”. On Tuesday night the City of Marion council voted to seek state government approval to sell the site to a developer who will build a battery-repurposing factory, a showroom and servicing facilities. Environmental concerns and worries the site will draw protesters were cited by those opposed to the plan. Ninety-five per cent of submissions called for the application to be rejected. Many voiced their opposition with words that were censored in the city’s official records, such as “Elon Musk and Tesla are a [redacted] on humanity”. Tesla sales have slumped amid a backlash against Musk for his work for the Trump administration, including slashing funding for government departments through his “department of government efficiency”, as well as his ideology and actions including what some saw as an apparent fascist salute. But Marion’s mayor, Kris Hanna, said blocking the sale of the site would have no impact on Musk and would have cost 100 local jobs. Hanna said the site’s soil was contaminated and not safe for recreation, so “it makes sense to have it sealed over with a renewable technology facility”. “If we didn’t proceed, it would have cost 100 jobs to local residents but it would have had no impact on Elon Musk,” he said. “Tesla would almost certainly find somewhere else in Australia to build their factory.” The factory is to be used to recover and recycle Tesla lithium-ion batteries.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Tesla wins council approval for new factory in South Australia despite vocal anti-Musk sentiment
Marion council votes to seek state government approval for battery factory in Adelaide despite hundreds of submissions opposing it
Tory Shepherd - 28 May 2025
Elon Musk’s Tesla is one step closer to opening a factory in Adelaide despite overwhelming community opposition expressing “anti-Tesla and anti-Elon Musk sentiment”.
On Tuesday night the City of Marion council voted to seek state government approval to sell the site to a developer who will build a battery-repurposing factory, a showroom and servicing facilities.
Environmental concerns and worries the site will draw protesters were cited by those opposed to the plan. Ninety-five per cent of submissions called for the application to be rejected.
Many voiced their opposition with words that were censored in the city’s official records, such as “Elon Musk and Tesla are a [redacted] on humanity”.
Tesla sales have slumped amid a backlash against Musk for his work for the Trump administration, including slashing funding for government departments through his “department of government efficiency”, as well as his ideology and actions including what some saw as an apparent fascist salute.
But Marion’s mayor, Kris Hanna, said blocking the sale of the site would have no impact on Musk and would have cost 100 local jobs.
Hanna said the site’s soil was contaminated and not safe for recreation, so “it makes sense to have it sealed over with a renewable technology facility”.
“If we didn’t proceed, it would have cost 100 jobs to local residents but it would have had no impact on Elon Musk,” he said. “Tesla would almost certainly find somewhere else in Australia to build their factory.”
The factory is to be used to recover and recycle Tesla lithium-ion batteries.
Sarah Luscombe, a Marion councillor who was opposed to the plan because of the threat to trees, as well as the community opposition, said while much of the focus had been on battery recycling, the benefits offered by the factory would be limited.
“My understanding is Tesla only recycle Tesla batteries and we know most people in SA … have another brand,” she said.
Hanna told ABC radio on Wednesday morning that the council voted eight to three to remove the site’s community land status, saying it had not been used since 2016. The reserve is a small part of a larger area that the developer wants to use for a Tesla factory.
He said the community opposition had been taken into account and “balanced against the economic factors”.
There were “certainly valid points of view … passionately held”, he said, but the “heart” was saying it didn’t want to deal with Musk while the “head” was saying it would be good for the community.
Hanna said while there was “significant” anti-Elon Musk sentiment, trees were another key issue. Tesla had now recognised that concern, he said, and had committed to replacing more trees than it would be required to, as well as keeping at least three of four significant trees on the site.
“Council has done what it can,” he said. “We’ll leave it up to the state government.”
This week Peter Malinauskas said Tesla was welcome in South Australia, according to the Advertiser.
“Any time we see any big, major industrial investment in our state, in my view, it is welcome,” the premier said. “Mr Musk’s politics, while I violently disagree with them … that’s his prerogative.”
A state government spokesperson said the proposal would be considered by the local government minister. “The state government welcomes investment and job creation in South Australia,” the spokesperson said.
https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2025/may/28/tesla-factory-marion-council-south-australia-adelaide-elon-musk
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73548
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23092967 (282221ZMAY25) Notable: Australia: They use mass immigration to create a housing crisis, which they use to push more people into renting - “You will own nothing” - In the following essay, Alison Bevege details how the housing crisis in Australia has been deliberately created using mass immigration. As housing becomes unaffordable for native Australians, large corporations swoop in to “save the day” by constructing build-to-rent tower blocks. In the vein of WEF’s “you will own nothing,” build-to-rent homes create permanent renters. “They want private property ownership phased out in favour of build-to-rent,” Bevege writes. When the housing crisis seems to be waning, the cycle begins again. The corporations which are building properties for rent lobby the government to increase migration, creating a housing crisis, which the lobbyists then use to remove more private ownership of property by building properties to rent. Using immigration, they have found a way to create a permanent crisis for which their solution, so they will tell you, is required. The Australian government has announced that it wants to import 13.5 million migrants by 2065, averaging 235,000 additional migrants each year. That’s enough immigrants per year to keep the housing crisis scam going for the next 40 years. This scam is not only affecting Australians; it is a global affair. The same scam is operating in the UK and the US, and some of the corporations involved are Canadian.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
General Research #28168
Australia: They use mass immigration to create a housing crisis, which they use to push more people into renting - “You will own nothing”
In the following essay, Alison Bevege details how the housing crisis in Australia has been deliberately created using mass immigration.
As housing becomes unaffordable for native Australians, large corporations swoop in to “save the day” by constructing build-to-rent tower blocks. In the vein of WEF’s “you will own nothing,” build-to-rent homes create permanent renters. “They want private property ownership phased out in favour of build-to-rent,” Bevege writes.
When the housing crisis seems to be waning, the cycle begins again. The corporations which are building properties for rent lobby the government to increase migration, creating a housing crisis, which the lobbyists then use to remove more private ownership of property by building properties to rent. Using immigration, they have found a way to create a permanent crisis for which their solution, so they will tell you, is required.
The Australian government has announced that it wants to import 13.5 million migrants by 2065, averaging 235,000 additional migrants each year. That’s enough immigrants per year to keep the housing crisis scam going for the next 40 years.
This scam is not only affecting Australians; it is a global affair. The same scam is operating in the UK and the US, and some of the corporations involved are Canadian.
https://expose-news.com/2025/05/27/mass-immigration-used-to-create-a-housing-crisis/
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73549
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23094549 (290926ZMAY25) Notable: Israel’s president Isaac Herzog invites Anthony Albanese to Jewish State after Gaza claims - In an effort to preserve relations with Australia, the President of Israel, Isaac Herzog, told an Australian media delegation visiting Jerusalem that he wanted Anthony Albanese to visit Israel to engage first-hand with the problems of the region. The explicit request from President Herzog - well informed on Australian politics – directly challenges the Albanese Government where distaste for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is visceral, with Labor’s preference being to keep its distance from Israel’s executive leader and driver of its Gaza war strategy. The deterioration in Australia-Israel ties is deepening with the Prime Minister’s attack on Israel earlier this week over humanitarian aid saying “Israel’s actions are completely unacceptable,” branding its behaviour “outrageous “and saying that Australia had aligned with other nations in expressing its opposition. In remarks to Australian editors and journalists, President Herzog made clear he would like to see Mr Albanese involved more directly - a sentiment that reflects the ingrained Israeli view that Australia has become both a remote and poorly informed critic of Israel’s Gaza strategy. “I welcome and invite the Prime Minister to visit Israel - absolutely,” President Herzog told the delegation. At the same time the president made clear his willingness to visit Australia as well. This follows a brief exchange between the president and PM in Rome for the recent inauguration of the new Pope, Leo X1V. Albanese has said he made it “very clear” to President Herzog in their Rome meeting that Israel’s failures on humanitarian aid to Gaza were “completely untenable and without credibility” since people were starving and “the idea that a democratic state withholds supply is an outrage.”
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73526
>>73541
Israel’s president Isaac Herzog invites Anthony Albanese to Jewish State after Gaza claims
PAUL KELLY - 29 May 2025
In an effort to preserve relations with Australia, the President of Israel, Isaac Herzog, told an Australian media delegation visiting Jerusalem that he wanted Anthony Albanese to visit Israel to engage first-hand with the problems of the region.
The explicit request from President Herzog – well informed on Australian politics – directly challenges the Albanese Government where distaste for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is visceral, with Labor’s preference being to keep its distance from Israel’s executive leader and driver of its Gaza war strategy.
The deterioration in Australia-Israel ties is deepening with the Prime Minister’s attack on Israel earlier this week over humanitarian aid saying “Israel’s actions are completely unacceptable,” branding its behaviour “outrageous “and saying that Australia had aligned with other nations in expressing its opposition.
In remarks to Australian editors and journalists, President Herzog made clear he would like to see Mr Albanese involved more directly – a sentiment that reflects the ingrained Israeli view that Australia has become both a remote and poorly informed critic of Israel’s Gaza strategy.
“I welcome and invite the Prime Minister to visit Israel – absolutely,” President Herzog told the delegation. At the same time the president made clear his willingness to visit Australia as well. This follows a brief exchange between the president and PM in Rome for the recent inauguration of the new Pope, Leo X1V.
Albanese has said he made it “very clear” to President Herzog in their Rome meeting that Israel’s failures on humanitarian aid to Gaza were “completely untenable and without credibility” since people were starving and “the idea that a democratic state withholds supply is an outrage.”
Australia’s position has been to call for a ceasefire, oppose Hamas as a terrorist group having any future role in Gaza, the immediate release of hostages and the provision of humanitarian aid. Albanese has said Australia’s criticism of Israel has been conveyed to its government both privately and publicly.
But Western criticism of Israel continues to mount with calls for recognition of a Palestinian state and sanctions against Israel. Such action would have virtually no impact on the ground but would have political significance – it would be seen as a diplomatic blow for Israel, a reward for Hamas and a further sinking of hopes for a two-state solution.
The Australian delegation that also includes former Treasurer and deputy Liberal leader, Josh Frydenberg, has been left in no doubt in its briefings in Jerusalem that relations have sunk to a low ebb, that Australia is seen as letting Israel down in its decisive moment of need and has misunderstood the nature of the current war.
Given the International Criminal Court finding against prime minister Netanyahu there is no prospect he will visit Australia at any point. A visit by the President of Israel, a non-executive office, would become an important statement and a contentious event – one Labor is unlikely to embrace.
https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/israels-president-isaac-herzog-invites-anthony-albanese-to-jewish-state-after-gaza-claims/news-story/a3e1e90b5043b5555193df84ceda8730
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73550
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23094571 (291000ZMAY25) Notable: Video: PM insists biosecurity is 'first priority' as beef tops agenda in upcoming US trade talks - Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has vowed not to compromise biosecurity as trade negotiations over beef are set to top the agenda in crucial talks with US President Donald Trump. Trump singled out Australia's ban on US beef during a Liberation Day tariff announcement in April, claiming Australia "won't take any of our beef" due to a concern over mad cow disease. Cattle Australia disputes that claim, because a ban on US beef was lifted in 2019, provided the cattle is born, raised and slaughtered in the US. But concerns over "mixed herds" mean beef from the US rarely makes it to Australian plates. US exporters are currently unable to prove their herds don't include beef that was born in Mexico and Canada, which are still rated a biosecurity risk, then later slaughtered in the US. "We haven't been assured there's a system that allows the appropriate tracing of animals, or appropriate traceback of animals," Cattle Australia chief executive Dr Chris Parker said. A review is underway into whether that should change, which could be used as a bargaining chip for Trump to drop all tariffs against Australia.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73433
Australia will keep pushing US to drop Trump tariffs after court ruling, trade minister says
Don Farrell says the government has been consistent in its view that tariffs on Australian imports to the US are unjustified
Ben Doherty and Josh Butler - 29 May 2025
1/2
Australia will continue to push Donald Trump to abandon his administration’s tariff regime entirely, after a US court blocked the president’s “liberation day” tariffs from coming into effect.
The Manhattan-based court of international trade said the US constitution gives the Congress exclusive powers to regulate commerce with other countries, and ruled that power was not superseded by the president’s self-declared “emergency” he cited to safeguard the US economy.
The Trump White House filed an appeal against the judgment minutes after it was handed down. The regime imposed a 10% across-the-board tariff on all Australian imports to the US. Several specific products, including steel and aluminium, are subject to higher tariff rates, up to 25%, which are not impacted by the court’s ruling.
The Australian trade minister, Don Farrell, said the Australian government would agitate for tariffs on Australian goods to be dumped entirely.
“We will study this ruling of the US Federal Courts on reciprocal tariffs closely and note that they may be subject to further legal processes through the courts,” he said.
“The Albanese Government has been consistent in the view that these tariffs on Australian imports into the US are unjustified,” Farrell said.
“We will continue to engage and strongly advocate for the removal of tariffs.”
“The Albanese Government will always stand up for Australia’s national interests, including Australian jobs and Australian industries.”
The US court found Trump overstepped his authority by imposing across-the-board tariffs on imports from countries all over the world. Trump called the tariffs, announced on 2 April, America’s “liberation day”.
“The court does not pass upon the wisdom or likely effectiveness of the President’s use of tariffs as leverage. That use is impermissible not because it is unwise or ineffective, but because (federal law) does not allow it,” a three-judge panel said in the decision.
The ruling came in a pair of lawsuits, one filed by the nonpartisan Liberty Justice Center on behalf of five small US businesses that import goods from countries targeted by the duties and the other by 13 US states.
The companies – which range from a New York wine and spirits importer to a Virginia-based maker of educational kits and musical instruments – have said the tariffs will hurt their ability to do business.
The lawsuit argued that the statue invoked by the president – the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) – does not give him the authority to unilaterally issue across-the-board worldwide tariffs.
“His claimed emergency is a figment of his own imagination: trade deficits, which have persisted for decades without causing economic harm, are not an emergency. Nor do these trade deficits constitute an ‘unusual and extraordinary threat’,” it argued.
Court documents specifically cited the tariffs imposed on Australian territories where there are no people, and, hence, no commerce.
“The Liberation Day Order imposed sweeping new tariffs at rates not seen since the Great Depression – including a global 10% tariffs on nearly all countries in the world – regardless of whether they impose tariffs on United States products, the rates at which they do so, or the existence of any trade agreements governing the relationship.
“These tariffs even applied to places with no civilian population or international trade activity, such as [Australian territories] the Heard and McDonald Islands, which are inhabited only by penguins and seals.”
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73551
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23094582 (291012ZMAY25) Notable: Video: Kevin Rudd says Australia can solve US critical minerals dilemma - Kevin Rudd says a draft accord proposed by Australia and presented to the Trump administration would allow the US to effectively become self-reliant in critical minerals, bolstering American economic resilience against China and strengthening ties between Canberra and Washington. Speaking at the Mackinac Policy Conference in Detroit, Dr Rudd said there were opportunities to enhance collaboration with America in the areas of critical minerals and by tapping the power of Australian superannuation funds for US-based investments - including in Michigan. The Australian ambassador also identified a key challenge for democracies in an era of growing political polarisation - the prevention of social disruption which threatened to break the “democratic contract between government and the governed”. A failure on this score would lead people to “look for alternatives”, he said. Speaking in conversation with Sandy Baruah, the chief executive of the Detroit Regional Chamber, Dr Rudd warned that China was seeking to entrench its dominance “across the 50 categories of critical minerals” designated by the US government. “The President of the United States has said this is a strategic priority. We agree with him,” he said. “The geology of the United States does not permit you to be self-reliant in all 50 because they’re not all here. But if you add Canada and Australia, you are. So what we need to work out - and we have a draft accord with the administration at present on these questions – is how do we collaborate both on the mining, the extraction, the transportation and the processing and the stockpiling to make our economies resilient, including what you’ll need for future battery manufacture for the future.”
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73534
Kevin Rudd says Australia can solve US critical minerals dilemma
JOE KELLY - 29 May 2025
1/2
Kevin Rudd says a draft accord proposed by Australia and presented to the Trump administration would allow the US to effectively become self-reliant in critical minerals, bolstering American economic resilience against China and strengthening ties between Canberra and Washington.
Speaking at the Mackinac Policy Conference in Detroit, Dr Rudd said there were opportunities to enhance collaboration with America in the areas of critical minerals and by tapping the power of Australian superannuation funds for US-based investments – including in Michigan.
The Australian ambassador also identified a key challenge for democracies in an era of growing political polarisation – the prevention of social disruption which threatened to break the “democratic contract between government and the governed”. A failure on this score would lead people to “look for alternatives”, he said.
Speaking in conversation with Sandy Baruah, the chief executive of the Detroit Regional Chamber, Dr Rudd warned that China was seeking to entrench its dominance “across the 50 categories of critical minerals” designated by the US government.
“The President of the United States has said this is a strategic priority. We agree with him,” he said. “The geology of the United States does not permit you to be self-reliant in all 50 because they’re not all here. But if you add Canada and Australia, you are.
“So what we need to work out – and we have a draft accord with the administration at present on these questions – is how do we collaborate both on the mining, the extraction, the transportation and the processing and the stockpiling to make our economies resilient, including what you’ll need for future battery manufacture for the future.”
He also said Australian superannuation savings were valued at $3 trillion in US dollars – “larger than the sovereign funds of Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates and Qatar combined”.
“Our funds cannot invest all those funds within Australia,” he said. “So, increasingly, they are diversifying offshore. Increasingly, they are coming here and they are investing in big long-scale, long-term infrastructure projects in various states in the United States.”
Despite a period of change in the US under Donald Trump, Dr Rudd said Australia’s alliance with Washington had endured over the terms of 15 US presidents and 15 Australian prime ministers. This was because it was anchored in “common interests and common values”.
He said it was strengthened by strong institutions, including the ANZUS treaty, the AUKUS trilateral security partnership, the Five Eyes intelligence sharing network, the Quadrilateral security dialogue and – despite a few “recent bumps in the road” – the US/Australia free trade agreement.
“Sure, President Trump’s administration has different priorities. But I printed the embassy mugs. On the outside it says, ‘Keep calm, we’re Australian,’” he joked. “And we’ll work our way through all of these little challenges.”
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73552
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23094587 (291018ZMAY25) Notable: War crimes investigator launches raids in major escalation - The elite anti-war crimes agency probing the involvement of ex-SAS soldiers in executions in Afghanistan conducted surprise raids in Perth on Wednesday as part of its ongoing investigations. It is the first time the Office of the Special Investigator (OSI) has launched raids on targets and amounts to a major escalation of its almost five-year inquiry into civilian deaths at the hands of Australian soldiers. The raids were confirmed by three official sources not permitted to speak publicly about the agency’s work. It is not clear if the raids were connected to the OSI’s examination of disgraced former soldier Ben Roberts-Smith, although detectives from the agency have spent months finalising the statements of witnesses who have agreed to testify against the disgraced war hero over his execution of prisoners and civilians. The OSI is examining suspected murders beyond the four cases that were part of the ex-soldier’s failed bid to clear his name. Witness statements collected by the OSI also deal with attempts by Roberts-Smith to cover up his war crimes. The raids were welcomed by SAS veterans who served in Afghanistan and who believe Roberts-Smith and the small number of other soldiers who allegedly executed civilians and prisoners brought shame onto the special forces regiment and should be held to account. However, veterans who back the war crimes suspects turned to social media to attack the OSI actions, claiming the raids were unjust. One post claimed the war crimes investigators, who include some of Australia’s most experienced homicide detectives, were trying to “shake the tree” to find evidence.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73512
>>73531
War crimes investigator launches raids in major escalation
Chris Masters and Nick McKenzie - May 29, 2025
The elite anti-war crimes agency probing the involvement of ex-SAS soldiers in executions in Afghanistan conducted surprise raids in Perth on Wednesday as part of its ongoing investigations.
It is the first time the Office of the Special Investigator (OSI) has launched raids on targets and amounts to a major escalation of its almost five-year inquiry into civilian deaths at the hands of Australian soldiers. The raids were confirmed by three official sources not permitted to speak publicly about the agency’s work.
It is not clear if the raids were connected to the OSI’s examination of disgraced former soldier Ben Roberts-Smith, although detectives from the agency have spent months finalising the statements of witnesses who have agreed to testify against the disgraced war hero over his execution of prisoners and civilians.
The OSI is examining suspected murders beyond the four cases that were part of the ex-soldier’s failed bid to clear his name.
Witness statements collected by the OSI also deal with attempts by Roberts-Smith to cover up his war crimes.
The raids were welcomed by SAS veterans who served in Afghanistan and who believe Roberts-Smith and the small number of other soldiers who allegedly executed civilians and prisoners brought shame onto the special forces regiment and should be held to account.
However, veterans who back the war crimes suspects turned to social media to attack the OSI actions, claiming the raids were unjust. One post claimed the war crimes investigators, who include some of Australia’s most experienced homicide detectives, were trying to “shake the tree” to find evidence.
This masthead revealed last week that the OSI, which has been investigating war criminal Roberts-Smith over multiple murders, including cases not canvassed in his marathon defamation trial, has secured the co-operation of new witnesses.
Roberts-Smith’s comprehensive loss before the full bench of the Federal Court – which affirmed the finding that the Special Air Service Regiment veteran ordered or carried out the murder of four Afghans – paved the way for the OSI to prosecute the former corporal.
The OSI is staffed with elite detectives from state police forces, including handpicked homicide investigators.
Sources said the OSI’s inquiries had proceeded far more slowly than the agency had hoped, but this was due to a painstakingly exhaustive and risk-averse approach adopted by its chief, former top prosecutor and judge Mark Weinberg.
Weinberg has sought to avoid the legal pitfalls that led to the abandonment in 2021 of an earlier federal police war crimes investigation targeting Roberts-Smith.
Five sources with knowledge of the OSI’s ongoing four-year investigation said its investigators had secured co-operation from key witnesses who had not participated in Roberts-Smith’s defamation trial.
The OSI is working closely with the Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions as it builds its case against Roberts-Smith, having collected statements from over a dozen SASR soldiers who claim Roberts-Smith arranged or participated in executions, including an incident in which he kicked a bound civilian off a small cliff.
The OSI is working with the AFP to target Roberts-Smith and has secured more evidence and witness co-operation than the stymied federal police probe.
The OSI probe is not only aimed at seeking to prosecute Roberts-Smith but several of his accomplices who, like the disgraced war hero, were also found to have lied during the defamation proceedings to cover up war crimes.
https://www.smh.com.au/national/war-crimes-investigator-launches-raids-in-major-escalation-20250528-p5m31z.html
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73553
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23099049 (301419ZMAY25) Notable: Video: Radical imam Ahmed Zoud’s apology to Jews one day, call for Allah to kill all ‘oppressors’ the next - An extremist cleric who preached that Jews were “bloodthirsty monsters” who “ran like rats” from the October 7 Hamas attack has formally apologised after Australia’s peak Jewish body lodged a vilification complaint over the sermon he delivered in 2023. However, The Australian can reveal that, as recently as last Friday, Sheikh Ahmed Zoud issued a prayer to the people of Gaza at the end of his sermon, for Allah to “deal with the tyrants and the oppressors” and to “kill them all, and leave none of them behind”. While Sheikh Zoud did not mention Jews by name in his latest rant, he had pledged in his apology not to repeat statements that “could be interpreted as targeting Jewish people as a whole”. On Thursday, the Executive Council of Australian Jewry welcomed the resolution of its complaint against Sheikh Zoud (also known as Sheikh Zod) to the Australian Human Rights Commission following Mr Zoud’s “unreserved” apology. ECAJ co-chief executive Peter Wertheim said the apology to the Jewish community was “a welcome admission of wrongdoing by Ahmed Zoud and we hope that it will serve as an example for the future about the limits of freedom of expression”. “We hope that the resolution of this complaint will serve as a reaffirmation of the principle that Australia is a safe place for people of all backgrounds, and no place for the kind of immoderate and at times anti-Semitic rhetoric that we have witnessed in recent times.” Upon learning of Sheikh Zoud’s latest inflammatory remarks, Mr Wertheim told The Australian that, if the imam failed to adhere to his undertakings, “we will have no hesitation in availing ourselves of legal remedies to enforce them.”
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Radical imam Ahmed Zoud’s apology to Jews one day, call for Allah to kill all ‘oppressors’ the next
STEPHEN RICE and MOHAMMAD ALFARES - May 29, 2025
1/2
An extremist cleric who preached that Jews were “bloodthirsty monsters” who “ran like rats” from the October 7 Hamas attack has formally apologised after Australia’s peak Jewish body lodged a vilification complaint over the sermon he delivered in 2023.
However, The Australian can reveal that, as recently as last Friday, Sheikh Ahmed Zoud issued a prayer to the people of Gaza at the end of his sermon, for Allah to “deal with the tyrants and the oppressors” and to “kill them all, and leave none of them behind”.
While Sheikh Zoud did not mention Jews by name in his latest rant, he had pledged in his apology not to repeat statements that “could be interpreted as targeting Jewish people as a whole”.
On Thursday, the Executive Council of Australian Jewry welcomed the resolution of its complaint against Sheikh Zoud (also known as Sheikh Zod) to the Australian Human Rights Commission following Mr Zoud’s “unreserved” apology.
ECAJ co-chief executive Peter Wertheim said the apology to the Jewish community was “a welcome admission of wrongdoing by Ahmed Zoud and we hope that it will serve as an example for the future about the limits of freedom of expression”.
“We hope that the resolution of this complaint will serve as a reaffirmation of the principle that Australia is a safe place for people of all backgrounds, and no place for the kind of immoderate and at times anti-Semitic rhetoric that we have witnessed in recent times.”
Upon learning of Sheikh Zoud’s latest inflammatory remarks, Mr Wertheim told The Australian that, if the imam failed to adhere to his undertakings, “we will have no hesitation in availing ourselves of legal remedies to enforce them.”
“We expect the terms on which that complaint was resolved to be honoured,” Mr Wertheim said. “In particular, we expect that Ahmed Zoud will adhere to the undertakings that he has given, and this includes not making or publishing any statement which makes derogatory generalisations about Jews, including statements which attribute to Jews, as a group, characteristics that vilify and demonise.”
The Human Rights Commission complaint was brought by Mr Wertheim and deputy president Robert Goot in March last year after a sermon by Sheikh Zoud entitled “The truth about the Jews and their characteristics”, delivered in Arabic in December 2023 at the Masjid As-Sunnah mosque the Sydney suburb of Lakemba.
“Who are these terrorists … these monsters … who have removed mercy from their hearts,” Sheikh Zoud said.
“These (people) are the Jews, not all of them, but most of them. The most important characteristic of the Jews is that they are thirsty for bloodshed … another is betrayal and treachery.”
Sheikh Zoud said the Jews “loved to shed blood” and accused them of raising their children on “violence, terrorism and killing”.
In a statement signed on April 23, Sheikh Zoud apologised “unreservedly and unconditionally” for his remarks.
“I deeply regret the way I framed my comments and understand how they could be interpreted as targeting Jewish people as a whole,” he said. “I did not intend to make such a sweeping generalisation. I did not seek to harm Jewish people based on their race or religion. This is not an excuse but an explanation to hopefully assure you that I will not repeat these comments.”
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73554
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23099119 (301433ZMAY25) Notable: Video: Radical cleric Wissam Haddad slams Muslim leaders - A Sydney Islamic fundamentalist at the centre of a Federal Court battle has accused Muslim leaders of abandoning him in a case he claims pits “Islam against disbelievers”, while urging them to publicly defend the right to quote inflammatory scripture about Jews. Wissam Haddad, who also goes by the name Abu Ousayd and leads the hardline Al Madina Dawah Centre, this week released a video appealing for religious unity ahead of a looming court showdown with the Executive Council of Australian Jewry. The Federal Court proceedings, which are expected to test the limits of religious expression and hate speech laws, centre on whether Mr Haddad’s public sermons - referencing verses in the Koran about Jews – amount to incitement or protected religious expression. The proceedings have been brought by ECAJ co-CEO Peter Wertheim and deputy president Robert Goot AO, and allege that Mr Haddad’s public speeches included derogatory generalisations about Jewish people, in which he described them as “vile people” and a “treacherous people”, and claimed they hide like “rats” when fighting Muslim men. In the video posted on Tuesday, Mr Haddad said he was concerned that Muslim leaders were retreating from the right to quote Islamic texts in public. “For the past couple of months I had been struggling, striving, trying to have the Muslim community at large and specifically the sheiks (clerics) and Muslim organisations understand that what I am currently facing in the Federal Court is not an issue of Abu Ousayd or Al Madina Dawah Centre versus the Jewish lobby … rather, it’s a battle between Islam and kuffar (disbelievers),” he said. “They wish to take and make those ayat and hadith (verses in the Koran) and historic accounts that speak about the Jews to what they see as insulting … they seek to make it criminal.”
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73553
Radical cleric Wissam Haddad slams Muslim leaders
MOHAMMAD ALFARES - 30 May 2025
A Sydney Islamic fundamentalist at the centre of a Federal Court battle has accused Muslim leaders of abandoning him in a case he claims pits “Islam against disbelievers”, while urging them to publicly defend the right to quote inflammatory scripture about Jews.
Wissam Haddad, who also goes by the name Abu Ousayd and leads the hardline Al Madina Dawah Centre, this week released a video appealing for religious unity ahead of a looming court showdown with the Executive Council of Australian Jewry.
The Federal Court proceedings, which are expected to test the limits of religious expression and hate speech laws, centre on whether Mr Haddad’s public sermons – referencing verses in the Koran about Jews – amount to incitement or protected religious expression.
The proceedings have been brought by ECAJ co-CEO Peter Wertheim and deputy president Robert Goot AO, and allege that Mr Haddad’s public speeches included derogatory generalisations about Jewish people, in which he described them as “vile people” and a “treacherous people”, and claimed they hide like “rats” when fighting Muslim men.
In the video posted on Tuesday, Mr Haddad said he was concerned that Muslim leaders were retreating from the right to quote Islamic texts in public.
“For the past couple of months I had been struggling, striving, trying to have the Muslim community at large and specifically the sheiks (clerics) and Muslim organisations understand that what I am currently facing in the Federal Court is not an issue of Abu Ousayd or Al Madina Dawah Centre versus the Jewish lobby … rather, it’s a battle between Islam and kuffar (disbelievers),” he said.
“They wish to take and make those ayat and hadith (verses in the Koran) and historic accounts that speak about the Jews to what they see as insulting … they seek to make it criminal.”
Mr Haddad claimed many Islamic organisations had refused to support his legal battle and warned that failing to do so would set a dangerous precedent to their “God-given right.”
The Australian understands that despite his desperate plea for support from some of the nation’s most prominent Muslim figures and organisations, Mr Haddad was largely flagged as a rogue cleric and was vehemently refused any backing. He has publicly insulted, attacked and accused many of the mainstream organisations who disagreed with his views as being “kuffar”.
“After repeated attempts, after numerous meetings with Muslim organisations and sheiks to try and get them to understand the seriousness of this case, many are still in denial,” Mr Haddad said.
Referencing extremist preacher Ahmed Zoud’s public apology to the Jews after a 2023 sermon in which he called them “bloodthirsty monsters” who “ran like rats” from the October 7 Hamas attack, Mr Haddad said his plea for financial and moral support came as a “last push”, adding that the Muslim community must “prove to Allah” their loyalty.
“We have all seen the video of Sheik Ahmed Zoud coming out openly, publicly apologising to the Jewish community. Apologising for the very same ayat and hadith (verses) which were referenced in the majority of my talks,” he said.
“So as a last attempt, as a last push, I ask you, the Muslim community and specifically the sheiks and the Muslim organisations, to get behind this cause. To join the caravan, it is not too late. Stand up for this God-given right that Allah Subhanahu Wa Ta’ala had given us to quote from the Koran and from the Sunnah. Do not sit on the sidelines.”
Mr Haddad has previously boasted of his friendship with Islamic State jihadis Khaled Sharrouf and Mohamed Elomar and said it was “not illegal” to be friends with convicted terrorists, while spruiking his relationship with “dear brother” Anjem Choudary, one of Britain’s most notorious extremists.
He has never been charged with any terrorism-related offence, despite his longstanding notoriety and ties to a web of dangerous terrorists.
A former ASIO spy called “Marcus”, who infiltrated Mr Haddad’s prayer centre between 2016 and 2023, revealed to the ABC’s Four Corners that young people in his controversial small-scale prayer centre in Bankstown were being indoctrinated into supporting Islamic State.
The Federal Court case between Mr Haddad and the ECAJ is scheduled to run for four days, beginning June 10.
https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/extremist-calls-for-muslim-support-in-battle-over-antijewish-sermons/news-story/e2833955cc166e7980ad56a7e0be74bc
https://www.instagram.com/abu.ousayd/reel/DKMWbPGJgpl/
https://qresear.ch/?q=Wissam+Haddad
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73555
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23099153 (301438ZMAY25) Notable: Video: Call to arm: US in direct defence spending plea to Richard Marles - Donald Trump’s Pentagon chief Pete Hegseth has issued a direct call for Australia to lift defence spending in face-to-face talks with Richard Marles, amid a US push for its global allies to stop free-riding off American military power. The Defence Minister assured his US counterpart that Australia was “very much up for that conversation”, just a day after Anthony Albanese ridiculed the nation’s top strategic think tank over its criticism of Australia’s “business as usual” defence budget. The US Defence Secretary’s call comes ahead of the Prime Minister’s first meeting with the US President in a fortnight at the G7 summit in Canada, where Mr Albanese will be looking for tariff relief and a firm commitment from Mr Trump to the AUKUS nuclear submarine partnership. The government left the defence budget languishing at about 2 per cent of GDP in the March budget, rising to a forecast 2.33 per cent in eight years, despite its own warnings of unprecedented strategic circumstances and US calls for allies to lift military spending to at least 3 per cent of national output. Mr Marles revealed Mr Hegseth urged him to boost the defence budget when they met on the sidelines of the Shangri-La Dialogue in Singapore on Friday.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73432
Call to arm: US in direct defence spending plea to Richard Marles
BEN PACKHAM - 30 May 2025
1/2
Donald Trump’s Pentagon chief Pete Hegseth has issued a direct call for Australia to lift defence spending in face-to-face talks with Richard Marles, amid a US push for its global allies to stop free-riding off American military power.
The Defence Minister assured his US counterpart that Australia was “very much up for that conversation”, just a day after Anthony Albanese ridiculed the nation’s top strategic think tank over its criticism of Australia’s “business as usual” defence budget.
The US Defence Secretary’s call comes ahead of the Prime Minister’s first meeting with the US President in a fortnight at the G7 summit in Canada, where Mr Albanese will be looking for tariff relief and a firm commitment from Mr Trump to the AUKUS nuclear submarine partnership.
The government left the defence budget languishing at about 2 per cent of GDP in the March budget, rising to a forecast 2.33 per cent in eight years, despite its own warnings of unprecedented strategic circumstances and US calls for allies to lift military spending to at least 3 per cent of national output.
Mr Marles revealed Mr Hegseth urged him to boost the defence budget when they met on the sidelines of the Shangri-La Dialogue in Singapore on Friday.
“The need to increase defence spending is something that he definitely raised,” Mr Marles told the ABC.
“You’ve seen the Americans in the way in which they’ve engaged with all of their friends and allies, asking them to do more. And we can completely understand why America would do that. And I would say this was done in a very respectful and dignified way, and we understand it and we’re very much up for that conversation.”
Mr Marles declined to reveal how much more Mr Hegseth wanted Australia to spend on defence. But the now-head of policy at the Pentagon, Elbridge Colby, made clear ahead of his April appointment that Australia needed to lift the defence budget to at least 3 per cent of GDP – a benchmark that would require an extra $28bn a year to be pumped into the military.
Mr Trump has called on European nations to spend even more, demanding 5 per cent of GDP from NATO members.
The Australian Strategic Policy Institute warned in its Cost of Defence report this week that the government’s failure to boost defence spending and its focus on future capabilities such as AUKUS had left a hollowed-out defence force that was ill-prepared for near-term conflict. “While those future capabilities are strategically important, they offer little immediate enhancement, thus creating a ‘paper ADF’ that lacks readiness for near-term conflict scenarios,” it said.
The Prime Minister responded to the report on Thursday by attacking the think tank’s credibility and independence.
“ASPI regularly produce these sort of reports … I think it’s predictable, frankly,” Mr Albanese said. “What we’re doing is getting on with the defence assets and providing the investment for those assets to be upgraded.”
ASPI executive director Justin Bassi welcomed Mr Marles’ comments on Friday. “The Defence Minister is absolutely right that we should be up for a conversation on increasing defence spending to meet the rising strategic threats we face,” Mr Bassi said. “Our report this week reached the same conclusion. We need to invest more, invest sooner and invest more smartly.
“That’s simply in Australia’s interests and that’s a widely accepted view in defence and strategic circles.”
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73556
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23103516 (311430ZMAY25) Notable: Tim Wilson officially new member for Goldstein after tight margins saw Zoe Daniel order a recount - A new member for the Melbourne seat of Goldstein has been crowned, four weeks after the federal election. Independent candidate Zoe Daniel demanded a recount after losing the seat to Liberal moderate Tim Wilson by just 260 votes, saying several errors were made during the distribution of preferences. The Australian Electoral Commission finalised the partial recount of 85,000 votes on Saturday confirming Mr Wilson had won with a margin of 175 votes. The former teal independent MP confirmed over social media she had officially conceded the marginal Melbourne seat, throwing jabs at the Liberal Party campaign in the process. In a video to her supporters, the climate-200 backed candidate suggested that “two steps forward is sometimes followed by one back”. “We do not seek to divide to win, we do not shelve our ethics or our principles. We do not resort to attack advertising, misinformation, disinformation, dirty tricks or personal attacks,” she said. “Winning that way is not something to be proud of.” In a statement posted to social media, Mr Wilson said after 29 days of counting the Liberals had 14,697 more first preference votes than the former MP. “I want to thank all Goldstein voters, but particularly the extraordinary effort some went to so their voice was heard,” he said. “Now the recount is finished, the result is clear. It is time to get on with the job and take the voice and values of Goldstein to shape the future of Australia.”
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73477
>>73535
>>73542
Tim Wilson officially new member for Goldstein after tight margins saw Zoe Daniel order a recount
EMMA KIRK and THOMAS HENRY - 31 May 2025
A new member for the Melbourne seat of Goldstein has been crowned, four weeks after the federal election.
Independent candidate Zoe Daniel demanded a recount after losing the seat to Liberal moderate Tim Wilson by just 260 votes, saying several errors were made during the distribution of preferences.
The Australian Electoral Commission finalised the partial recount of 85,000 votes on Saturday confirming Mr Wilson had won with a margin of 175 votes.
The former teal independent MP confirmed over social media she had officially conceded the marginal Melbourne seat, throwing jabs at the Liberal Party campaign in the process.
In a video to her supporters, the climate-200 backed candidate suggested that “two steps forward is sometimes followed by one back”.
“We do not seek to divide to win, we do not shelve our ethics or our principles. We do not resort to attack advertising, misinformation, disinformation, dirty tricks or personal attacks,” she said.
“Winning that way is not something to be proud of.”
In a statement posted to social media, Mr Wilson said after 29 days of counting the Liberals had 14,697 more first preference votes than the former MP.
“I want to thank all Goldstein voters, but particularly the extraordinary effort some went to so their voice was heard,” he said.
“Now the recount is finished, the result is clear. It is time to get on with the job and take the voice and values of Goldstein to shape the future of Australia.”
Ms Daniel declared victory in the highly contested seat on election night after early counting leaned heavily in her favour.
But a surge in postal votes over the following days swung the pendulum back into blue-ribbon territory, with the seat actually called for Mr Wilson on May 7.
Ms Daniel refused to concede the seat at the time and insisted on waiting for the full distribution of preferences and then demanded a recount, which was granted in part by the Australian Electoral Commission (AEC).
She said it had been a long process to recount the 85,000 votes representing 75 per cent of votes cast.
“Goldstein is now one of the most marginal seats in the country, and with that comes embedded accountability,” she said.
“In that, we have done our job.
“In a world where trust in elections is being eroded in so many places, we should never take this for granted.”
https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/tim-wilson-officially-new-member-for-goldstein-after-tight-margins-saw-zoe-daniel-order-a-recount/news-story/fed5e5ad42dada9df6fe656826a4216d
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73557
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23012542 (091343ZMAY25) Notable: FBI tip-off leads to arrest of Alice Springs man for child rape - An Alice Springs man has been charged with multiple child abuse offences - including the alleged rape of a child – following a referral by the United States’ Federal Bureau of Investigation. Earlier this week NT Police received an “urgent referral” from the FBI, via the Australian Federal Police, with officers executing a search warrant and allegedly seizing “large quantities” of child abuse material. Officers from the NT Joint Anti-Child Exploitation Team, a joint child abuse taskforce comprising of the Australian Federal Police and NT Police, allege the man also sexually assaulted a child “under the age of five”, who was known to him. He has been charged with nine serious child abuse charges of sexual intercourse with child under 10, two counts of gross indecency with child under 14, three counts of produce child abuse material for use via a carriage service, possess or control child abuse material, access child abuse material and transmit child abuse material. NT Police Detective Superintendent Paul Lawson commended the “seamless collaboration” between NT Police, AFP and the FBI to bring the man before the courts. “If you allegedly abuse a child or procure, access and transmit child abuse material, we will find you, and you will be prosecuted,” Superintendent Lawson said. “We will continue to work tirelessly to protect children from harm.” Senior police warned that alleged “offenders cannot hide behind a screen” if they allegedly “carry out these reprehensible and hideous acts”. It comes just months after The Australian revealed a five-year-old boy had allegedly been raped in a remote Northern Territory community, with one advocate alleging half of the 20 remote communities she visited in 2024 had children as young as five exhibiting “harmful sexual behaviour”.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
FBI tip-off leads to arrest of Alice Springs man for child rape
LIAM MENDES - 9 May 2025
An Alice Springs man has been charged with multiple child abuse offences – including the alleged rape of a child – following a referral by the United States’ Federal Bureau of Investigation.
Earlier this week NT Police received an “urgent referral” from the FBI, via the Australian Federal Police, with officers executing a search warrant and allegedly seizing “large quantities” of child abuse material.
Officers from the NT Joint Anti-Child Exploitation Team, a joint child abuse taskforce comprising of the Australian Federal Police and NT Police, allege the man also sexually assaulted a child “under the age of five”, who was known to him.
He has been charged with nine serious child abuse charges of sexual intercourse with child under 10, two counts of gross indecency with child under 14, three counts of produce child abuse material for use via a carriage service, possess or control child abuse material, access child abuse material and transmit child abuse material.
NT Police Detective Superintendent Paul Lawson commended the “seamless collaboration” between NT Police, AFP and the FBI to bring the man before the courts.
“If you allegedly abuse a child or procure, access and transmit child abuse material, we will find you, and you will be prosecuted,” Superintendent Lawson said. “We will continue to work tirelessly to protect children from harm.”
Senior police warned that alleged “offenders cannot hide behind a screen” if they allegedly “carry out these reprehensible and hideous acts”.
It comes just months after The Australian revealed a five-year-old boy had allegedly been raped in a remote Northern Territory community, with one advocate alleging half of the 20 remote communities she visited in 2024 had children as young as five exhibiting “harmful sexual behaviour”.
Child abuse prevention educator Holly-ann Martin, who has visited 87 remote communities during her 35-year career to provide her abuse prevention education program, said there was an “epidemic” of child sexual abuse and further awareness needed to be drawn to the “nationwide issue”.
“I would have been in at least 20 remote communities last year and at least half of them were because of children exhibiting harmful sexual behaviours,” she said on Friday.
Ms Martin, who was awarded an Order of Australia for her work with children, said these cases had already been reported to authorities, but she was seeing children as young as five who had been exposed to pornographic material and were then going on to act out what they were seeing in pornography on other children.
https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/fbi-tipoff-leads-to-arrest-of-alice-springs-man-for-child-rape/news-story/2dff7a58b4b2dc864228fb415a288a12
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73558
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23016865 (101352ZMAY25) Notable: Aussie teen girl to speak at sentencing for sadistic cult ringleader Kyle Spitze - The FBI has asked an Australian teenager blackmailed into livestreaming self-harm and live sex shows to speak at the sentencing of one of the ringleaders of a sadistic extremist online cult. Kyle Spitze, 25, a notorious member of terror groups 764 and offshoot HarmNation - where offenders compete with each other to coerce kids to kill their pets and produce sexual and violent content – is due to be sentenced in a court in Tennessee in July. Among the heinous crimes he has agreed to plead guilty to are possessing child sexual abuse material - some were of a child aged 12 – and distributing ‘animal crushing’ videos. His charges relate to US victims, but the FBI have also found images of the Australian girl, who we are not naming, on Spitze’s phone. After being contacted by the FBI via the Australian Federal Police, both the Australian girl and her mother will give victim impact statements via video link at Spitze’s sentencing. A detective from the NSW police has been helping them with their statements. The mother said these predators were pure evil and her daughter, who was left suicidal, was “covered with scars that are visible, and those inside her that are not”. “She was made to mutilate her body and encouraged to starve herself, leading to a diagnosis of anorexia,” her mum said. She hopes being allowed to read her impact statement to Spitze will give her 18-year-old daughter, who was 16 at the time of the abuse, some power back. Spitze’s sick activities were exposed after a video he posted of his stepfather shooting him in the ear went viral and victims outed him as an abuser. An AFP spokesperson said intelligence sharing between international and domestic law enforcement partners has enabled them to identify and investigate online users linked to some of these extreme groups online.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Aussie teen girl to speak at sentencing for sadistic cult ringleader Kyle Spitze
An Aussie teen blackmailed by a sadistic online cult ringleader will speak against him at his sentencing, after police found images of her on his phone. WARNING: Graphic
Julie Cross - May 10, 2025
EXCLUSIVE: The FBI has asked an Australian teenager blackmailed into livestreaming self-harm and live sex shows to speak at the sentencing of one of the ringleaders of a sadistic extremist online cult.
Kyle Spitze, 25, a notorious member of terror groups 764 and offshoot HarmNation – where offenders compete with each other to coerce kids to kill their pets and produce sexual and violent content – is due to be sentenced in a court in Tennessee in July.
Among the heinous crimes he has agreed to plead guilty to are possessing child sexual abuse material – some were of a child aged 12 – and distributing ‘animal crushing’ videos.
His charges relate to US victims, but the FBI have also found images of the Australian girl, who we are not naming, on Spitze’s phone.
After being contacted by the FBI via the Australian Federal Police, both the Australian girl and her mother will give victim impact statements via video link at Spitze’s sentencing. A detective from the NSW police has been helping them with their statements.
The mother said these predators were pure evil and her daughter, who was left suicidal, was “covered with scars that are visible, and those inside her that are not”.
“She was made to mutilate her body and encouraged to starve herself, leading to a diagnosis of anorexia,” her mum said.
She hopes being allowed to read her impact statement to Spitze will give her 18-year-old daughter, who was 16 at the time of the abuse, some power back.
Spitze, who operated under the name ‘Criminal’, was a leading figure in this global network of dangerous deviants, who work individually and collectively, to abuse young victims.
The Australian girl found herself passed virtually to different members around the world, including a man in Sweden.
Explicit images of her were made public as punishment for not complying with their demands.
Later, one ordered her to murder the family pet cat which she also refused.
In revenge, members “swatted her” – made calls to the Australian police with false allegations – which led to a dozen armed police surrounding the family home.
The Australian Federal Police released warnings about sadistic sextortion groups last year.
Helen Schneider, from the AFP-led Australian Centre to Counter Child Exploitation (ACCCE), said these offenders – many are children – exploit other children “for their deranged amusement”.
“The content we’ve seen demanded includes live sex acts, animal cruelty, serious self harm and requests for livestreamed suicide of our victims,” she said.
The groups seek out children on popular social media and gaming apps, like Roblox, Minecraft, Instagram and Snapchat, before moving them onto Telegram and Discord, where the abuse is broadcast.
Spitze’s sick activities were exposed after a video he posted of his stepfather shooting him in the ear went viral and victims outed him as an abuser.
An AFP spokesperson said intelligence sharing between international and domestic law enforcement partners has enabled them to identify and investigate online users linked to some of these extreme groups online.
In 2022, a 14-year-old from WA was found to have child abuse material and videos of animal cruelty on his phone after targeting victims around the world.
He was charged and received a juvenile caution in relation to the matter.
Police are urging the public who have information about people involved in child abuse to contact the ACCCE.
https://www.accce.gov.au/
If you know abuse is happening right now or a child is at risk, call triple-0.
For help with emotional difficulties, contact Lifeline on 13 11 14 or at:
https://www.lifeline.org.au/
For help with depression, contact Beyond Blue on 1300 22 46 36 or at:
https://www.beyondblue.org.au/
The SANE Helpline is 1800 18 SANE (7263) or at:
https://www.sane.org/
https://www.cairnspost.com.au/truecrimeaustralia/aussie-teen-girl-to-speak-at-sentencing-for-sadistic-cult-ringleader-kyle-spitze/news-story/14f7b20560520575681d59e0838b80bf
—
The 764 Network: The Strange Case of Kyle Spitze
Becca Spinks - Jul 19, 2024
https://x.com/bx_on_x/status/1814158500458569768
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73559
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23016875 (101355ZMAY25) Notable: Video: How gun-toting Texas mum Becca Spinks takes down online cult 764 - This is the gun toting Texan mum looking to take down a new wave of sadistic online abusers grooming Australian kids to livestream sick and twisted acts from their bedrooms. In July, the self-defence educator and independent investigator, Becca Spinks, hopes to be in court to watch 25-year-old Kyle Spitze, from Tennessee, get a hefty jail sentence after he agreed to plead guilty to charges of possessing child sexual abuse material and distributing ‘animal crushing’ videos. One of his victims is Australian. “I just want to look at him and see if there’s any kind of soul left,” Spinks said. “Every time I’ve seen him on video, in a picture, he just looks demonic. He looks evil.” None of Spitze’s charges relate to the NSW victim, now 18, but the FBI found pictures of her on his phone, and she alleges he and other members blackmailed her into doing livestream sex acts and self-harm shows. She was also forced to carve their names into her body with a blade. Spitze is a big scalp for Spinks, 40, who describes herself as “just a normal mum”, who hunts predators online in her spare time. His big mistake was posting a video of his stepfather shooting him in the ear in January 2024, which went viral. His victims, who saw the video, began outing him on social media as a pedophile and sadistic Satanist in an online cult called 764, and an offshoot group called HarmNation. “The day that video went viral, Kyle was on X threatening the girls who were trying to speak out against him, and his tag was Criminal764,” Spinks said. “We looked at his followers and we found all these other abusers.” Her online detective work, along with help from his victims, including the mother of the Australian teenager, played a significant role in bringing Spitze to the attention of the FBI. And it shone a light on these deviant misfits, some children themselves, who get off on torturing mainly young girls to take part in degrading sex acts, live ‘cut shows’, animal abuse - one victim bit off the head of their hamster – and where the ultimate prize is getting someone to livestream their own suicide.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73558
How gun-toting Texas mum Becca Spinks takes down online cult 764
She describes herself as “just a normal mum”, is hunting predators online who are targeting Aussie kids through their evil twisted acts.
Julie Cross - May 10, 2025
1/2
EXCLUSIVE: This is the gun toting Texan mum looking to take down a new wave of sadistic online abusers grooming Australian kids to livestream sick and twisted acts from their bedrooms.
In July, the self-defence educator and independent investigator, Becca Spinks, hopes to be in court to watch 25-year-old Kyle Spitze, from Tennessee, get a hefty jail sentence after he agreed to plead guilty to charges of possessing child sexual abuse material and distributing ‘animal crushing’ videos.
One of his victims is Australian.
“I just want to look at him and see if there’s any kind of soul left,” Spinks said.
“Every time I’ve seen him on video, in a picture, he just looks demonic. He looks evil.”
None of Spitze’s charges relate to the NSW victim, now 18, but the FBI found pictures of her on his phone, and she alleges he and other members blackmailed her into doing livestream sex acts and self-harm shows. She was also forced to carve their names into her body with a blade.
Spitze is a big scalp for Spinks, 40, who describes herself as “just a normal mum”, who hunts predators online in her spare time.
His big mistake was posting a video of his stepfather shooting him in the ear in January 2024, which went viral. His victims, who saw the video, began outing him on social media as a pedophile and sadistic Satanist in an online cult called 764, and an offshoot group called HarmNation.
“The day that video went viral, Kyle was on X threatening the girls who were trying to speak out against him, and his tag was Criminal764,” Spinks said. “We looked at his followers and we found all these other abusers.”
Her online detective work, along with help from his victims, including the mother of the Australian teenager, played a significant role in bringing Spitze to the attention of the FBI.
And it shone a light on these deviant misfits, some children themselves, who get off on torturing mainly young girls to take part in degrading sex acts, live ‘cut shows’, animal abuse – one victim bit off the head of their hamster – and where the ultimate prize is getting someone to livestream their own suicide.
Unbelievably, the group’s US-based founder, Bradley Cadenhead, a gore video junkie, was himself just a child of 15 when he set it up in 2021. He was jailed for 80 years in 2023 for creating videos in which children were sexually abused, choked, beaten and suffocated.
While Spitze and Cadenhead are in the US, it has global appeal, with offenders operating all over the world, often out of their bedrooms. Australia is not immune. In a warning about groups including 764 last year, the Australian Federal Police said a 14-year-old from WA was found to have child abuse material and videos of animal cruelty on his phone after targeting victims overseas. He was charged in 2022 and received a juvenile caution in relation to the matter.
Spinks said her efforts to expose Spitze and 764, upset other offenders, including ‘Acid’ – real name Cameron Finnigan – 19, from the UK.
“Figures like Acid and a few others started to really harass and threaten me because they didn’t like the attention they were getting,” Spinks said. “So I just kept it up, you know? And over time, I became like the public face of all of this.”
Finnegan has since been jailed for six years for encouraging suicide, possessing a terrorism manual, and indecent images of a child. Police discovered swastikas and pentagrams on his bedroom walls.
Spinks said 764 and groups like it are continually evolving, and popping up in different forms, but they all operate under an umbrella community nicknamed the ‘Com’.
Some align themselves with pedophiles, or Satanists or white supremacists, or a mix, or none of the above. The one common thread is their desire to terrify and traumatise their victims in order to gain status and notoriety within their groups.
They seek out vulnerable victims in self-harm or eating disorder chatrooms, as well as on social media and gaming apps like Minecraft and Roblox.
Their modus operandi is to befriend kids on social media and gaming apps, shower them with affection, before manipulating them into providing something like an explicit photo of themselves – then threatening to share the photos unless they produce ever more extreme content.
Many victims don’t recognise themselves as victims, and are sometimes persuaded to become abusers themselves.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73560
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23032055 (140956ZMAY25) Notable: Xi congratulates Anthony Albanese, calls on PM to work with China to promote ‘world peace’ - President Xi Jinping has congratulated Anthony Albanese on his re-election, saying he wants to work with the Australian Prime Minister to strengthen their relationship and promote “world peace and stability”. In a written message delivered on Tuesday as the Prime Minister was sworn in by Australia’s Governor-General, the Chinese leader said he had engaged in “in-depth discussions on strategic, comprehensive and directional issues” in his three meetings with Mr Albanese. “These discussions led to important consensuses that have provided strategic guidance to improve and grow bilateral ties,” Mr Xi said, according to Chinese newsagency Xinhua. The Chinese president said he was ready to work with Mr Albanese to “advance the China-Australia comprehensive strategic partnership in a steady fashion”. “Strengthening co-operation between China and Australia is of great significance for achieving shared development and promoting world peace and stability,” said Mr Xi in comments that were also run on the front-page of Wednesday’s People’s Daily, the Communist Party’s leading newspaper. China’s Premier Li Qiang also sent a congratulatory message, according to Xinhua, saying he wanted to work with the Prime Minister on promoting a “more mature, stable and fruitful China-Australia comprehensive strategic partnership”. The Prime Minister is expected to visit China later in the year. The warm comments underscore the notable improvement in the diplomatic relationship since 2022, even as polls find actions by China continue to stoke anxiety among a majority of Australians.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73455
>>73464
>>73484
Xi congratulates Anthony Albanese, calls on PM to work with China to promote ‘world peace’
WILL GLASGOW - 14 May 2025
1/2
President Xi Jinping has congratulated Anthony Albanese on his re-election, saying he wants to work with the Australian Prime Minister to strengthen their relationship and promote “world peace and stability”.
In a written message delivered on Tuesday as the Prime Minister was sworn in by Australia’s Governor-General, the Chinese leader said he had engaged in “in-depth discussions on strategic, comprehensive and directional issues” in his three meetings with Mr Albanese.
“These discussions led to important consensuses that have provided strategic guidance to improve and grow bilateral ties,” Mr Xi said, according to Chinese newsagency Xinhua.
The Chinese president said he was ready to work with Mr Albanese to “advance the China-Australia comprehensive strategic partnership in a steady fashion”.
“Strengthening co-operation between China and Australia is of great significance for achieving shared development and promoting world peace and stability,” said Mr Xi in comments that were also run on the front-page of Wednesday’s People’s Daily, the Communist Party’s leading newspaper.
China’s Premier Li Qiang also sent a congratulatory message, according to Xinhua, saying he wanted to work with the Prime Minister on promoting a “more mature, stable and fruitful China-Australia comprehensive strategic partnership”.
The Prime Minister is expected to visit China later in the year. The warm comments underscore the notable improvement in the diplomatic relationship since 2022, even as polls find actions by China continue to stoke anxiety among a majority of Australians.
Weeks before the election, a People’s Liberation Army Navy flotilla circumnavigated Australia and conducted live fire drills in the Tasman Sea.
During the Albanese government’s first term, all of the trade bans on Australian exports to China previously worth $20 billion a year were unwound. A freeze on all ministerial contact which Beijing had imposed on the Morrison government was also lifted.
Chinese state media has welcomed the return of the Albanese government and called for it to conduct a “pragmatic China policy”.
“A sustained pragmatic and rational approach to China under Albanese 2.0 will help take the bilateral relationship to a new level of mutually beneficial co-operation,” the Global Times wrote in a recent editorial.
“Experience in recent years has shown that blindly following Washington’s lead and treating China as a strategic adversary has harmed Australia’s diplomatic independence and dealt real blows to its economy,” the Chinese party-state outlet said.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73561
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23032067 (141003ZMAY25) Notable: OPINION: Why stable China ties are vital for Australia - "In an uncertain world, people crave stability, and Australian electoral behavior is no different: In challenging times, voters tend to stick with the incumbent government. Over the past three years, the Albanese administration has been defined by cautious steadiness. It's fair to say that stabilizing relations with China has emerged as one of Labor's standout foreign policy achievements. Since Albanese's Labor Party came to power in May 2022, it has rolled back the previous Coalition's anti-China stance and taken proactive measures to enhance dialogue with Beijing. Under the direct engagement and strategic leadership of both countries' leaders, China-Australia relations have bottomed out and rebounded, warming across the board. Exchanges in various fields have taken positive strides, and economic and trade flows have fully recovered - earning widespread support on both sides. Throughout the election campaign, Labor, as the governing party, maintained continuity in its China policy and generally adopted a rational, restrained tone in all China-related statements. This pragmatic, steady approach won the trust of voters. In this election, the Australian people ultimately chose the Labor Party, the side of certainty facing an uncertain world, based on their expectations of policy stability and continuity. The Labor government now has more reason to adhere to an independent foreign policy and to work toward the steady and sustained growth of China-Australia relations. In this way, the two countries can provide a more stable and favorable policy environment for mutually beneficial economic and trade cooperation, striving to bring more tangible benefits to both countries and their people." - Wang Zhenyu - globaltimes.cn
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73560
OPINION: Why stable China ties are vital for Australia
Wang Zhenyu - May 13, 2025
1/2
Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and his ministers were sworn in for a second term on Tuesday after the Labor Party's landslide win in the national election. The new government's domestic and foreign policy directions have drawn widespread attention. Recently, Victorian Premier Jacinta Allan announced that she will lead a trade mission to China this September to hold in-depth talks on education, trade and culture. Allan emphasized, "In an era of tariffs and global economic uncertainty, I want to seize an opportunity for Victoria," adding, "We have an opportunity to turn a new page in our relationship with China."
Allan's comments precisely reflect the public mood revealed by this Australian election. In fact, the vote took place against a backdrop of unprecedented global uncertainty and a "cost-of-living crisis" at home. At the crucial final stage of the campaign, the US announced it would impose "reciprocal tariffs" on most of its trading partners - even its ally Australia. That move left Australian voters feeling cold, anxious, and resentful, and caused trust in Coalition leader Peter Dutton to plummet. In the end, the Coalition suffered a crushing defeat, and Dutton himself became the first opposition leader in nearly a century to lose his own seat.
In an uncertain world, people crave stability, and Australian electoral behavior is no different: In challenging times, voters tend to stick with the incumbent government. Over the past three years, the Albanese administration has been defined by cautious steadiness. It's fair to say that stabilizing relations with China has emerged as one of Labor's standout foreign policy achievements.
Since Albanese's Labor Party came to power in May 2022, it has rolled back the previous Coalition's anti-China stance and taken proactive measures to enhance dialogue with Beijing. Under the direct engagement and strategic leadership of both countries' leaders, China-Australia relations have bottomed out and rebounded, warming across the board. Exchanges in various fields have taken positive strides, and economic and trade flows have fully recovered - earning widespread support on both sides. Throughout the election campaign, Labor, as the governing party, maintained continuity in its China policy and generally adopted a rational, restrained tone in all China-related statements. This pragmatic, steady approach won the trust of voters.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73562
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23045815 (171344ZMAY25) Notable: Video: AFP will train Pacific peacekeepers to help counter China’s influence - The Australian Federal Police is boosting its role in the Pacific in the face of growing competition from China by agreeing to train Pacific island police to become UN peacekeepers. The move comes at a time when China is aggressively trying to strike police co-operation deals with Pacific Island nations as a means to gain leverage over their strategic direction. In response, the AFP is boosting its policing engagement across the Pacific Island region as part of Australia’s broader diplomatic push to prevent China establishing footholds in the region. Beijing has criticised the AFP for having an “impure motive” to “contain China” in its growing push to forge closer links with Pacific island nations. As part of its attempts to sideline China and forge closer relationships with the Pacific, the AFP is hosting the world’s first UN Police Peacekeeping Training course tailored specifically for the Pacific region. The course, which started in Brisbane this week, brings together 100 police officers from across the Pacific and East Timor and aims to build a deployable, Pacific-led UN peacekeeping capability. AFP Assistant Commissioner Nigel Ryan said the course would help “reinforce Australia’s role as a preferred partner of choice in the Pacific for sustained peace, security and prosperity in the region”. Mr Ryan said the AFP’s presence in the Pacific had grown “exponentially” in recent years, and despite growing competition from China he believed that Australia was still the partner of choice in policing and security. “It’s no secret that China has ambitions to increase their presence in the Pacific in the security space,” he told The Australian. “But we’ve got longstanding relationships going back decades with our Pacific partners, and they’re very strong relationships. “We are part of the Pacific family and Australia is recognised as the partner of choice, particularly in the security space.”
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73464
>>73484
AFP will train Pacific peacekeepers to help counter China’s influence
CAMERON STEWART - May 16, 2025
The Australian Federal Police is boosting its role in the Pacific in the face of growing competition from China by agreeing to train Pacific island police to become UN peacekeepers.
The move comes at a time when China is aggressively trying to strike police co-operation deals with Pacific Island nations as a means to gain leverage over their strategic direction.
In response, the AFP is boosting its policing engagement across the Pacific Island region as part of Australia’s broader diplomatic push to prevent China establishing footholds in the region.
Beijing has criticised the AFP for having an “impure motive” to “contain China” in its growing push to forge closer links with Pacific island nations.
As part of its attempts to sideline China and forge closer relationships with the Pacific, the AFP is hosting the world’s first UN Police Peacekeeping Training course tailored specifically for the Pacific region.
The course, which started in Brisbane this week, brings together 100 police officers from across the Pacific and East Timor and aims to build a deployable, Pacific-led UN peacekeeping capability.
AFP Assistant Commissioner Nigel Ryan said the course would help “reinforce Australia’s role as a preferred partner of choice in the Pacific for sustained peace, security and prosperity in the region”.
Mr Ryan said the AFP’s presence in the Pacific had grown “exponentially” in recent years, and despite growing competition from China he believed that Australia was still the partner of choice in policing and security.
“It’s no secret that China has ambitions to increase their presence in the Pacific in the security space,” he told The Australian. “But we’ve got longstanding relationships going back decades with our Pacific partners, and they’re very strong relationships.
“We are part of the Pacific family and Australia is recognised as the partner of choice, particularly in the security space.”
AFP Deputy Commissioner Lesa Gale said the peacekeeping course provided “a powerful stage to amplify the region’s collective approach to policing and draw global attention to collaborations such as the Pacific Policing Initiative, which is a Pacific-led and Australia-backed initiative to strengthen peace and security.
The PPI, which was endorsed by Pacific Island leaders last year, has been criticised by China as having the “impure motive” of “containing China’s security presence in the region”.
“With an impure motive, the pact only exposes Australia’s attempt to intervene in regional countries’ security decision-making, and such manoeuvres prioritise US strategic blueprint while bringing limited, if any, benefits to Australia or Pacific Island Countries needs,” the state-owned Global Times said last year.
“Such an exclusive policing pact not only violates general principles in international relations but also infringes on PICs’ sovereignty to independently choose co-operation partners.”
China has stepped up its push to secure police co-operation deals across the region. It currently has police security agreements with Solomon Islands, Fiji, Vanuatu and Kiribati. Papua New Guinea turned down a Chinese proposal for a police agreement last year after pressure from Australia. In some countries like Solomon Islands and Fiji, both the AFP and Chinese police provide assistance to local police and security forces.
The AFP has lifted its presence in the Pacific to more than 100 AFP personnel stationed across the region to help fight transnational and cyber crime and provide specialist training to Pacific police forces.
The AFP chose to host the UN training course in response to a desire by Pacific nations to contribute more actively to international peacekeeping efforts.
“The inaugural (five week) course will significantly advance those ambitions, giving Pacific member nations a meaningful role internationally in helping shepherd nations from conflict to peace,” Ms Gale said.
https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/defence/afp-will-train-pacific-peacekeepers-to-help-counter-chinas-influence/news-story/3d5993ff6d1c34abb7548aa10b16e388
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pnibS9yawUI
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73563
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23045840 (171353ZMAY25) Notable: Taiwan urges Australia to defy China on Trump-proofing trade pact - Taiwan is urging Australia to stare down opposition from Beijing and support its admission to a sweeping regional free trade pact to help buffer it from the volatility of Donald Trump’s tariff gyrations. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese announced during a visit to Jakarta on Thursday that Australia will back Indonesia’s bid to join the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP), but Taiwan’s request to join the pact has been stalled since 2021. Australia is serving as the rotating chair of the 12-nation grouping this year, giving it responsibility for guiding the group’s activities and priorities. “We definitely call for Australia’s support of Taiwan’s accession to the CPTPP, which we see as the gateway to future trade,” Taiwan’s de facto ambassador to Australia, Douglas Hsu, said in an interview with this masthead. Australia does not recognise Taiwan as a state, meaning its top envoy is known as the head of its economic and cultural office rather than an ambassador. “Australia and Taiwan have a complementary trade partnership, we believe that we can meet the high standards of the CPTPP regulations and we have a good track record dealing with other trading partners. “The CPTPP is a trade mechanism, so we definitely will urge all the members to review Taiwan’s case based on the merits instead of the geopolitics.”
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73560
>>73561
Taiwan urges Australia to defy China on Trump-proofing trade pact
Matthew Knott - May 17, 2025
1/2
Taiwan is urging Australia to stare down opposition from Beijing and support its admission to a sweeping regional free trade pact to help buffer it from the volatility of Donald Trump’s tariff gyrations.
Prime Minister Anthony Albanese announced during a visit to Jakarta on Thursday that Australia will back Indonesia’s bid to join the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP), but Taiwan’s request to join the pact has been stalled since 2021.
Australia is serving as the rotating chair of the 12-nation grouping this year, giving it responsibility for guiding the group’s activities and priorities.
“We definitely call for Australia’s support of Taiwan’s accession to the CPTPP, which we see as the gateway to future trade,” Taiwan’s de facto ambassador to Australia, Douglas Hsu, said in an interview with this masthead.
Australia does not recognise Taiwan as a state, meaning its top envoy is known as the head of its economic and cultural office rather than an ambassador.
“Australia and Taiwan have a complementary trade partnership, we believe that we can meet the high standards of the CPTPP regulations and we have a good track record dealing with other trading partners.
“The CPTPP is a trade mechanism, so we definitely will urge all the members to review Taiwan’s case based on the merits instead of the geopolitics.”
Taiwan’s push to join the pact – which covers around 15 per cent of global trade – has been given increased impetus by Trump’s decision to announce a crushing 32 per cent tariff on all Taiwanese imports. The tariffs have since been suspended for 90 days alongside all the US president’s other reciprocal tariffs.
China – whose own application to join the partnership is under review – has fiercely opposed Taiwan being admitted to international trade pacts and multilateral bodies as it claims the self-governing democratic island as part of its sovereign territory.
Referring to China’s opposition to its membership bid, Hsu said several member states had “told us they suffer a kind of pressure from a country that is not currently in the CPTPP itself, so they have some hesitations to agree to let Taiwan in at the moment”.
Hsu praised Australia for backing Taiwan’s bid to be given observer status at the World Health Organisation despite Beijing’s opposition, declaring: “You can definitely stand firm against any kind of coercion.”
Hsu said that Taiwan had been an active member of the World Trade Organisation and APEC for decades, making it a natural fit for the CPTPP, which evolved from the Trans Pacific Partnership when the United States withdrew in 2017.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73564
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23045901 (171414ZMAY25) Notable: Sex abuse survivor urges Timor-Leste president not to pardon paedophile ex-priest Richard Daschbach - A woman who survived sexual abuse at the hands of a convicted paedophile priest fears he will hurt her again if the Timor-Leste government succeeds in having him pardoned. Defrocked priest Richard Daschbach, a United States citizen, was convicted by a Timor-Leste court in December 2021 after being found guilty of sexually abusing orphaned and disadvantaged young girls under his care. The high-profile trial and conviction were the first of their kind in the staunchly religious nation, where about 97 per cent of the population identifies as Catholic. Daschbach, now 88 years old, has had the strong support of Timor-Leste's Prime Minister Xanana Gusmão, who attended his 2021 trial and controversially celebrated Daschbach's birthday at the time. This week it was revealed Timor-Leste's government had proposed that the ex-priest be pardoned and released from prison. Mária, who Daschbach sexually abused when she was a child at the Topu Honis children's shelter in the country's remote west, is calling for Timorese President José Ramos-Horta to reject the government-backed proposal to release him. "If he gets out, he could commit his evil deeds to other women," Mária, who the ABC has given a pseudonym for safety reasons, said. "It looks like he will go back to the Topu Honis orphanage [where he committed his crimes] and could hurt our hearts as victims who have attended [his] trial in court." Mr Ramos-Horta must decide whether to grant Daschbach's release by Tuesday, to coincide with the country's annual Independence Day celebrations. It is a tradition for convicted criminals to receive pardons on that day. The proposal to pardon Daschbach only four years into his 12-year prison term has faced a backlash from both advocates of victim-survivors and opposition MPs. Legal aid groups in Timor-Leste have called on Mr Ramos-Horta to meet victim-survivors before making a decision on the matter.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Sex abuse survivor urges Timor-Leste president not to pardon paedophile ex-priest Richard Daschbach
Vonia Vieira, Doug Dingwall and Nick Sas - 17 May 2025
1/2
A woman who survived sexual abuse at the hands of a convicted paedophile priest fears he will hurt her again if the Timor-Leste government succeeds in having him pardoned.
Defrocked priest Richard Daschbach, a United States citizen, was convicted by a Timor-Leste court in December 2021 after being found guilty of sexually abusing orphaned and disadvantaged young girls under his care.
The high-profile trial and conviction were the first of their kind in the staunchly religious nation, where about 97 per cent of the population identifies as Catholic.
Daschbach, now 88 years old, has had the strong support of Timor-Leste's Prime Minister Xanana Gusmão, who attended his 2021 trial and controversially celebrated Daschbach's birthday at the time.
This week it was revealed Timor-Leste's government had proposed that the ex-priest be pardoned and released from prison.
Mária, who Daschbach sexually abused when she was a child at the Topu Honis children's shelter in the country's remote west, is calling for Timorese President José Ramos-Horta to reject the government-backed proposal to release him.
"If he gets out, he could commit his evil deeds to other women," Mária, who the ABC has given a pseudonym for safety reasons, said.
"It looks like he will go back to the Topu Honis orphanage [where he committed his crimes] and could hurt our hearts as victims who have attended [his] trial in court."
Mr Ramos-Horta must decide whether to grant Daschbach's release by Tuesday, to coincide with the country's annual Independence Day celebrations.
It is a tradition for convicted criminals to receive pardons on that day.
The proposal to pardon Daschbach only four years into his 12-year prison term has faced a backlash from both advocates of victim-survivors and opposition MPs.
Legal aid groups in Timor-Leste have called on Mr Ramos-Horta to meet victim-survivors before making a decision on the matter.
Observers also warn the proposal to pardon Daschbach will retraumatise victim-survivors and send a dangerous message to Timor-Leste about child sexual abuse and gender-based violence.
"He was found guilty and admitted to terrible crimes against young girls," said Sara Niner, a Monash University senior lecturer who has researched Timor-Leste for 20 years.
"The man should die in jail."
'We will be afraid'
Mária said she and other victim-survivors lived in fear before Daschbach was convicted and imprisoned four years ago.
"We looked for people to hide us," she said.
"When he went to prison, we felt free, we were not afraid," she said.
But she fears that will change if he is released and says victim-survivors will suffer even more.
"If he does get out of prison, we'll be afraid again, because as victims, what we say, people won't believe us again," she said.
"People can provoke us again."
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73565
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23045988 (171445ZMAY25) Notable: Victorian sisters abused by paedophile priest say High Court decision has halted quest for compensation - Sisters Bernie and Trish have not had a restful night since they were abused by a paedophile priest in the 1970s. "You don't sleep afterwards like a normal human sleeps. You're never carefree again, Bernie said. To sleep soundly, the sisters need to know no-one can come through their bedroom doors, so their husbands made them special wooden jams to lock them in place. "You can have happy days, and you can do things, but you're not that innocent, Bernie said. "You never, ever become that carefree kid." The sisters were abused by notorious paedophile priest Bryan Coffey - who is now dead — and the pair are pursuing the Catholic Church for compensation. But the sisters' legal pursuit is in jeopardy after the High Court made it harder to find the church vicariously liable. Coffey was never convicted of the women's abuse, but Trish received a letter of apology from the Ballarat bishop's office in 2015. Another victim, known as "DP", was also abused by Coffey when he was a five year old in Port Fairy in south-west Victoria. In 2021, he was awarded $200,000 by two Victorian courts, which found the church was vicariously liable for the harm caused by Coffey. But the church appealed that ruling to the High Court and won, because Coffey was not an employee - instead, he had a relationship of a spiritual nature with the church. "This is people pushing words around on a piece of paper as if we don't even exist anymore. And we've felt insignificant for most of our lives," Bernie said. "It's really, really shit to do it when they have knowledge that he did this to us." The landmark decision late last year has placed pressure on state governments to retrospectively change the law. "We just need someone to listen to say that this is not right. We need to make these changes to help everyone. It's unfair that every time they find an avenue, a new lawyer finds a new way of doing things [to defend the church], Trish said.''
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50976 (pb)
Victorian sisters abused by paedophile priest say High Court decision has halted quest for compensation
Richard Willingham - 14 May 2025
1/2
Sisters Bernie and Trish have not had a restful night since they were abused by a paedophile priest in the 1970s.
"You don't sleep afterwards like a normal human sleeps. You're never carefree again,'' Bernie said.
To sleep soundly, the sisters need to know no-one can come through their bedroom doors, so their husbands made them special wooden jams to lock them in place.
"You can have happy days, and you can do things, but you're not that innocent,'' Bernie said.
"You never, ever become that carefree kid."
The sisters were abused by notorious paedophile priest Bryan Coffey — who is now dead — and the pair are pursuing the Catholic Church for compensation.
But the sisters' legal pursuit is in jeopardy after the High Court made it harder to find the church vicariously liable.
Coffey was never convicted of the women's abuse, but Trish received a letter of apology from the Ballarat bishop's office in 2015.
Another victim, known as "DP", was also abused by Coffey when he was a five year old in Port Fairy in south-west Victoria.
In 2021, he was awarded $200,000 by two Victorian courts, which found the church was vicariously liable for the harm caused by Coffey.
But the church appealed that ruling to the High Court and won, because Coffey was not an employee — instead, he had a relationship of a spiritual nature with the church.
"This is people pushing words around on a piece of paper as if we don't even exist anymore. And we've felt insignificant for most of our lives," Bernie said.
"It's really, really shit to do it when they have knowledge that he did this to us."
The landmark decision late last year has placed pressure on state governments to retrospectively change the law.
"We just need someone to listen to say that this is not right. We need to make these changes to help everyone. It's unfair that every time they find an avenue, a new lawyer finds a new way of doing things [to defend the church],'' Trish said.
High Court decision has 'dire' consequences, advocate says
On Wednesday, Victoria's upper house will debate a private member's bill to hold institutions to account by making it easier to find them vicariously liable.
The idea that Coffey was not an employee is fanciful, the sisters said.
Their lawyer and longtime victim-survivor advocate Judy Courtin said Victoria used to be a leader in tackling institutional abuse, but was falling behind.
"Once again, and despite all the work done by the royal commission, parliament and others to ensure victims of institutional child abuse might receive justice, the church has secured dispensation from responsibility, this time via a technical argument before the High Court,'' Dr Courtin said in a letter to the state's Attorney-General.
"The consequences of this decision are dire."
Ms Courtin said some of her clients pursuing similar action were suicidal as a result of the High Court ruling.
Law reform has the backing of various victim-survivor groups and the Australian Lawyers Alliance.
The issue has been taken to the Standing Council of Attorneys-General, where it has been discussed, but no plan of action has been developed.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73566
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23062845 (210939ZMAY25) Notable: Anthony Albanese to visit China for second time amid Xi Jinping's push for 'mature' ties with Australia - Prime Minister Anthony Albanese will travel to China later this year to meet President Xi Jinping and Premier Li Qiang, marking his second official visit to China in two years. The ABC understands the prime minister will attend the Annual Leaders' Meeting, part of a resumed high-level dialogue last held in Canberra in June 2024 during Mr Li's visit to Australia. The trip follows a warm personal letter from Mr Xi congratulating Mr Albanese on his re-election. In the message, Mr Xi highlighted China's interest in "promoting a more mature, stable and productive" relationship with Australia, a deliberate nod to Beijing's desire to build sustained engagement with the Labor government. The second visit places Mr Albanese among a small group of Australian prime ministers to be invited to Beijing so frequently. He made stabilising ties with China a core foreign policy priority during his first term, resuming ministerial dialogue and steering the relationship out of a prolonged diplomatic freeze. During his first trip to China, in November 2023, Mr Xi invited him to return and see more of the country, reinforcing what both sides now describe as a "comprehensive strategic partnership". The trip was widely seen as a diplomatic breakthrough, not only securing the release of detained Australian journalist Cheng Lei after three years in custody, but also resulting in the removal of all remaining trade impediments imposed on Australian exports during the Coalition government. The date of the meeting is yet to be announced by Mr Albanese.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73560
>>73563
Anthony Albanese to visit China for second time amid Xi Jinping's push for 'mature' ties with Australia
Bang Xiao - 21 May 2025
1/2
Prime Minister Anthony Albanese will travel to China later this year to meet President Xi Jinping and Premier Li Qiang, marking his second official visit to China in two years.
The ABC understands the prime minister will attend the Annual Leaders' Meeting, part of a resumed high-level dialogue last held in Canberra in June 2024 during Mr Li's visit to Australia.
The trip follows a warm personal letter from Mr Xi congratulating Mr Albanese on his re-election.
In the message, Mr Xi highlighted China's interest in "promoting a more mature, stable and productive" relationship with Australia, a deliberate nod to Beijing's desire to build sustained engagement with the Labor government.
The second visit places Mr Albanese among a small group of Australian prime ministers to be invited to Beijing so frequently.
He made stabilising ties with China a core foreign policy priority during his first term, resuming ministerial dialogue and steering the relationship out of a prolonged diplomatic freeze.
During his first trip to China, in November 2023, Mr Xi invited him to return and see more of the country, reinforcing what both sides now describe as a "comprehensive strategic partnership".
The trip was widely seen as a diplomatic breakthrough, not only securing the release of detained Australian journalist Cheng Lei after three years in custody, but also resulting in the removal of all remaining trade impediments imposed on Australian exports during the Coalition government.
The date of the meeting is yet to be announced by Mr Albanese.
Strategic window amid global trade realignments
News of the visit comes as Mr Albanese wraps up his visit to Indonesia, where he met President Prabowo Subianto, and to Rome, where he met with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and attended the inauguration of Pope Leo XIV.
The ABC understands the meetings in China are likely to occur against the backdrop of a 90-day pause in the US-China tariff stand-off, with both Beijing and Washington stepping back from further escalation until August.
While Australia is not directly involved in the trade war, the temporary reprieve has opened up space for middle powers to pursue their own trade and diplomatic interests.
John Fitzgerald, emeritus professor at Swinburne University of Technology, says the visit shows the Australia-China relationship is "back on track", but Canberra must continue to navigate a shifting geopolitical landscape in the region.
"The visit has to be a good thing — but it's also a return to what used to be normal," Dr Fitzgerald said.
"There were routine, regular bilateral leadership meetings and a Comprehensive Strategic Dialogue with China, held annually in both countries."
Dr Fitzgerald said Australia was long seen as needing to balance its economic ties with China against its security alliance with the United States — but that balance has become less clear since Donald Trump came to power.
"Australia still has a balancing act," he said.
"It's more like balancing Australia's economic dependence on China — and China's willingness to leverage that dependence against Australia's need to build more comprehensive security and defence relations with other countries in the region and with Europe."
Re-engaging with Canberra is part of China's broader effort to shore up key economic partnerships amid a shifting global trade landscape.
The largest export market for Australia, worth over $210 billion a year, has been reopened under Mr Albanese's administration, delivering tangible gains across critical sectors.
According to government records from China, more than 40 official Chinese delegations have visited federal, state and territory governments in Australia since May 2022, with most concentrated in Victoria, New South Wales and the ACT.
The delegations have focused on trade, education, clean energy and cultural exchange, reflecting growing state-level engagement alongside the top-level diplomatic reset.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73567
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23076633 (241313ZMAY25) Notable: Cheap Aussie ‘Mozzie’ all the buzz to replace global market-leading Chinese drones - An Australian technology company is poised to meet a critical challenge for the nation’s security, designing a $5000 drone for military use with domestically sourced parts and those from friendly countries. The only Chinese component in Grabba Technologies’ Mozzie drone is its electric motor, and the company is working with two local firms that are close to producing Australian-made alternatives. The privately owned Brisbane company was selected for the challenge by Defence’s Advanced Strategic Capabilities Accelerator, which needed an affordable multi-mission drone under 2kg for use by the Australian Defence Force and national security agencies. The locally made drone gives Australian and allied users a trusted alternative to Chinese drones that dominate the global market. The ASCA challenge followed the removal from service of more than 800 Chinese-made drones that had been operated by the ADF, and 41 in use with the Australian Border Force. The Mozzie, which can undertake surveillance missions or drop bombs on enemy soldiers, will meet US “blue list” guidelines for technology products with entirely friendly-nation supply chains. The explosion in drone warfare seen in Ukraine has piled pressure on the Australian government to bring uncrewed systems into service as rapidly as possible. Grabba Technologies is set to sell 260 of the drones to Defence for testing by the army, navy and air force, and hopes to sell tens of thousands more to the ADF and allied militaries, and law enforcement agencies.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Cheap Aussie ‘Mozzie’ all the buzz to replace global market-leading Chinese drones
BEN PACKHAM - May 22, 2025
An Australian technology company is poised to meet a critical challenge for the nation’s security, designing a $5000 drone for military use with domestically sourced parts and those from friendly countries.
The only Chinese component in Grabba Technologies’ Mozzie drone is its electric motor, and the company is working with two local firms that are close to producing Australian-made alternatives.
The privately owned Brisbane company was selected for the challenge by Defence’s Advanced Strategic Capabilities Accelerator, which needed an affordable multi-mission drone under 2kg for use by the Australian Defence Force and national security agencies.
The locally made drone gives Australian and allied users a trusted alternative to Chinese drones that dominate the global market.
The ASCA challenge followed the removal from service of more than 800 Chinese-made drones that had been operated by the ADF, and 41 in use with the Australian Border Force.
The Mozzie, which can undertake surveillance missions or drop bombs on enemy soldiers, will meet US “blue list” guidelines for technology products with entirely friendly-nation supply chains.
The explosion in drone warfare seen in Ukraine has piled pressure on the Australian government to bring uncrewed systems into service as rapidly as possible.
Grabba Technologies is set to sell 260 of the drones to Defence for testing by the army, navy and air force, and hopes to sell tens of thousands more to the ADF and allied militaries, and law enforcement agencies.
The basic Mozzie drone can be tailored to meet the requirements of each military service, with additional protection, radio technologies, cameras and payloads.
Grabba executive chairman Ross McKinnon said the challenge was a tough one, requiring the company to build the drone “from the ground up” to meet ASCA requirements.
The company had to design many of the drone’s components, including its base station and on-board gimbal to keep its camera steady, in order to keep costs down and ensure a trusted supply chain.
“That was actually a really good thing, because it meant that we weren’t just rebuilding a foreign product,” Mr McKinnon said.
“This is a world-leading drone in its category, sub-2kg, but low-cost and Australian-made.”
The company will sell the drones for $5000 each to the Australian government, which kicked in $2.2m to develop it, but will charge about twice that for an export version. The next-cheapest drone on the international market with equivalent specifications costs about $18,000.
“There’s actually a gap in the market for a blue-list equivalent drone at this price point. So we can sell this and export this because of the constraints the commonwealth set on us,” Mr McKinnon said.
The company is also developing larger versions of the drone, up to one tonne.
The ASCA challenge was aimed at developing a sovereign drone that could be produced at scale to meet emerging strategic challenges.
Mr McKinnon said while the market wasn’t yet big enough to pump out large quantities of the aircraft, the company could rapidly ramp up production “if we get in a scrap”.
He said the company was already working with international buyers, including the US Department of Homeland Security, and had partnered with Australian-owned company EPE, which supplied robots to allied militaries.
“They say our drone is the best and they are taking it to the global market,” Mr McKinnon said.
The ADF has lagged many militaries in getting uncrewed systems into service, acquiring its first lethal drones last year.
It purchased an undisclosed number of US-made Switchblade 300s – a lightweight “loitering munition” – and has a variety of unarmed drones used for intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance tasks.
Australian taxpayers have also contributed $1bn towards the development of Boeing’s Ghost Bat, a “loyal wingman”-style drone designed to operate with manned fighter jets.
Boeing says the uncrewed jet is one of the most advanced aircraft of its kind in the world, but it is years away from entering service and faces stiff competition from rivals selected for a key US Air Force program.
https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/defence/cheap-aussie-mozzie-all-the-buzz-to-replace-global-marketleading-chinese-drones/news-story/d2041abf6b0a500be3d7e105c5eb1bc2
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73568
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23080012 (251040ZMAY25) Notable: Father of choirboy who claimed son was abused by Cardinal George Pell settles case against Catholic Church - The father of a dead choirboy who claimed his son was sexually assaulted by Cardinal George Pell has sensationally dropped his landmark legal case against the Catholic Church. The Sunday Herald Sun can reveal the man - known only as RWQ – has setlled a claim against the Catholic Archdiocese of Melbourne after a protracted three-year fight. It is understood the man is battling cancer and ended the claim a day before lawyers were due to record his evidence in a rare hospital bedside sitting. The terms of the settlement are unclear but it is understood the church admitted no fault or wrongdoing but will pay the man some of his legal costs but not damages. The man launched legal action after Pell, who died in 2023, was freed from prison following a successful High Court appeal that saw a string of convictions for child sexual assault quashed. The choirboy’s father was seeking damages for mental harm suffered as a result of being informed by police of the alleged abuse of his late son. Pell was convicted of abusing the choirboy, who cannot be identified, who died of a drug overdose in 2014 and never disclosed any allegations of abuse to his parents or authorities. But another choirboy, known only as Witness J, testified that both boys were both abused in the sacristy of St Patrick’s Cathedral after Sunday mass in 1996. After failing to appeal a string of convictions in Victoria’s Court of Appeal, Pell was ultimately acquitted by a unanimous 7-0 decision of the High Court. Despite ending his claim, RWQ’s case will leave lasting ramifications for other psychological injury claims in Victoria because of the Church’s efforts to knock it out of court. It led to a hugely significant High Court decision that ruled “secondary” victims were free to pursue damages in such claims. The Church unsuccessfully argued that parents, siblings, friends and families of abuse victims should be ineligible to launch claims. Legal experts warned the court decision would lead to a flood of claims by secondary seeking damages against a range of organisations for psychological injury. They could include the state government, WorkSafe, the TAC, schools, clubs, kinders, religious organisations and social and cultural groups. Before his shock death following complications from hip replacement surgery in January 2023, Cardinal Pell was preparing to give evidence in RWQ’s case.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Father of choirboy who claimed son was abused by Cardinal George Pell settles case against Catholic Church
The father of a dead choirboy who claimed his son was abused by George Pell has settled his landmark legal case against the Catholic Church a day before he was due to give evidence.
Shannon Deery - May 25, 2025
1/2
The father of a dead choirboy who claimed his son was sexually assaulted by Cardinal George Pell has sensationally dropped his landmark legal case against the Catholic Church.
The Sunday Herald Sun can reveal the man – known only as RWQ – has setlled a claim against the Catholic Archdiocese of Melbourne after a protracted three-year fight.
It is understood the man is battling cancer and ended the claim a day before lawyers were due to record his evidence in a rare hospital bedside sitting.
The terms of the settlement are unclear but it is understood the church admitted no fault or wrongdoing but will pay the man some of his legal costs but not damages.
The man launched legal action after Pell, who died in 2023, was freed from prison following a successful High Court appeal that saw a string of convictions for child sexual assault quashed.
The choirboy’s father was seeking damages for mental harm suffered as a result of being informed by police of the alleged abuse of his late son.
Pell was convicted of abusing the choirboy, who cannot be identified, who died of a drug overdose in 2014 and never disclosed any allegations of abuse to his parents or authorities.
But another choirboy, known only as Witness J, testified that both boys were both abused in the sacristy of St Patrick’s Cathedral after Sunday mass in 1996.
After failing to appeal a string of convictions in Victoria’s Court of Appeal, Pell was ultimately acquitted by a unanimous 7-0 decision of the High Court.
Despite ending his claim, RWQ’s case will leave lasting ramifications for other psychological injury claims in Victoria because of the Church’s efforts to knock it out of court.
It led to a hugely significant High Court decision that ruled “secondary” victims were free to pursue damages in such claims.
The Church unsuccessfully argued that parents, siblings, friends and families of abuse victims should be ineligible to launch claims.
Legal experts warned the court decision would lead to a flood of claims by secondary seeking damages against a range of organisations for psychological injury.
They could include the state government, WorkSafe, the TAC, schools, clubs, kinders, religious organisations and social and cultural groups.
Before his shock death following complications from hip replacement surgery in January 2023, Cardinal Pell was preparing to give evidence in RWQ’s case.
The trial was expected to rehash all of the evidence heard at Pell’s two criminal trials and appeals before the Supreme Court and High Court.
Cardinal Pell spent 405 days in prison after being convicted on four counts of indecent assault and one of sexual penetration of a child over the alleged abuse of the two choirboys.
He was released after the High Court quashed his convictions, finding the jury who found him guilty was wrong to do so, having not considered the entirety of the evidence at trial.
From the time he was originally charged in 2017 Pell vehemently denied any wrongdoing.
https://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/victoria/father-of-choirboy-who-claimed-son-was-abused-by-cardinal-george-pell-drops-case-against-catholic-church/news-story/ac9ce892281770abe64ca9dbe4de8463
https://qresear.ch/?q=RWQ
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73569
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23083159 (260935ZMAY25) Notable: Chinese ambassador Xiao Qian hits out over ‘ethically questionable’ Port of Darwin lease buyback - The Chinese ambassador to Australia says Anthony Albanese’s promise to boot a Chinese company from operating the Port of Darwin is “ethically questionable,” urging the government to honour the 99-year lease. In a statement released by the embassy on Sunday night, Xiao Qian criticised Australia’s “ethically questionable” behaviour and said port owners Landbridge Group had made “significant investments” after winning a 99-year lease in 2015 for $506m. The comments follow an election promise to buy back the lease, with the Prime Minister threatening direct intervention if the government is unable to find a new buyer. “These efforts have brought remarkable improvements to the port, turning its financial situation from losses to profits and contributing positively to local economic and social development,” Mr Xiao said. “Such an enterprise and project deserves encouragement, not punishment. “It is ethically questionable to lease the port when it was unprofitable and then seek to reclaim it once it becomes profitable.” Mr Xiao said Landbridge Group had undertaken an “open and transparent bidding process” to secure the commercial contract and urged the Australian government to honour its binding commitments. While he acknowledged that Australia and China were “comprehensive strategic partners”, Mr Xiao said the countries needed to “foster mutual trust”. “We hope the Australian side will view the Darwin Port project objectively, honour its binding commitments under the contract and respect the autonomous decisions made by businesses based on development needs,” he said. “We hope the Australian federal government and the Northern Territory government will create a fair, transparent, and predictable business environment for Chinese enterprises operating in Australia.”
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>51038 (pb)
>>73421
>>73560
Chinese ambassador Xiao Qian hits out over ‘ethically questionable’ Port of Darwin lease buyback
China’s ambassador to Australia says Anthony Albanese’s plan to kick out the Chinese-owned operators of the Port of Darwin is “ethically questionable”.
Jessica Wang - May 26, 2025
The Chinese ambassador to Australia says Anthony Albanese’s promise to boot a Chinese company from operating the Port of Darwin is “ethically questionable,” urging the government to honour the 99-year lease.
In a statement released by the embassy on Sunday night, Xiao Qian criticised Australia’s “ethically questionable” behaviour and said port owners Landbridge Group had made “significant investments” after winning a 99-year lease in 2015 for $506m.
The comments follow an election promise to buy back the lease, with the Prime Minister threatening direct intervention if the government is unable to find a new buyer.
“These efforts have brought remarkable improvements to the port, turning its financial situation from losses to profits and contributing positively to local economic and social development,” Mr Xiao said.
“Such an enterprise and project deserves encouragement, not punishment.
“It is ethically questionable to lease the port when it was unprofitable and then seek to reclaim it once it becomes profitable.”
Mr Xiao said Landbridge Group had undertaken an “open and transparent bidding process” to secure the commercial contract and urged the Australian government to honour its binding commitments.
While he acknowledged that Australia and China were “comprehensive strategic partners”, Mr Xiao said the countries needed to “foster mutual trust”. “We hope the Australian side will view the Darwin Port project objectively, honour its binding commitments under the contract and respect the autonomous decisions made by businesses based on development needs,” he said.
“We hope the Australian federal government and the Northern Territory government will create a fair, transparent, and predictable business environment for Chinese enterprises operating in Australia.”
As it stands, Australia’s special envoy for defence and northern Australia Luke Gosling has confirmed he has met with new buyers and said he was committed to ensuring a “good return on investment for the Chinese owners Landbridge”.
Returning the port’s ownership to Australian hands was sparked by concerns the critical piece of infrastructure should not be owned by a foreign entity.
It was leased to the Landbridge Group in 2015 under the Country Liberal territory government, reportedly taking the federal government by surprise.
Landbridge has also maintained the port is not for sale, and confirmed on Monday that it has yet to receive any engagements from any level of government.
“It is business as usual at Darwin Port, as we continue to focus on the growth of our operations,” said the group’s Australian non-executive director Terry O’Connor.
“Darwin port representatives escorted the Ambassador on a tour of the port during his recent visit to Darwin.
“Landbridge welcomes his comments in relation to the Port’s operation and its contribution to the Northern Territory economy.”
https://www.news.com.au/national/politics/chinese-ambassador-xiao-qian-hits-out-over-ethically-questionable-port-of-darwin-lease-buyback/news-story/017cfd79bed64c6695f8b231d8df0e3d
http://au.china-embassy.gov.cn/eng/dshd/202505/t20250525_11632718.htm
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73570
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23083164 (260944ZMAY25) Notable: Chinese ambassador blasts Darwin Port lease plan as 'ethically questionable' - China's ambassador to Australia has fired a warning shot to the Albanese government over its plans to take back the port of Darwin, describing the move as "ethically questionable". The strategically important northern Australian port has been a hotly debated national security issue since it was leased to Chinese firm Landbridge by the NT government for 99-years in 2015. During this year's federal election campaign, both Labor and the Coalition made duelling pledges to get the port "back into Australian hands". Federal Labor has not given a firm indication of exactly how it will do that, but has repeatedly said it has been speaking with Australian firms to possibly take over the lease. Ambassador Xiao Qian published a statement on his website on Sunday, days after making a trip to Darwin where he said he visited the port and met with staff at Landbridge. "A decade ago, the Landbridge Group secured the lease for the port of Darwin through an open and transparent bidding process, fully compliant with Australian laws and market principles," he said. "Over the past 10 years, Landbridge Group has made significant investments in maintaining and building Darwin Port's infrastructure, optimising its operations and management, and expanding its customer sources. These efforts have brought remarkable improvements to the port, turning its financial situation from losses to profits and contributing positively to local economic and social development." Mr Xiao also called on the Northern Territory and federal governments to "honour its binding commitments" under the contract and "respect the autonomous decisions made by businesses made by development needs". "Such an enterprise and project deserves encouragement, not punishment. It is ethically questionable to lease the port when it was unprofitable and then seek to reclaim it once it becomes profitable." Members of the previous NT government that leased the port to Landbridge have said the decision was made to lease it after the federal government of the day failed to fund needed infrastructure upgrades.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73569
Chinese ambassador blasts Darwin Port lease plan as 'ethically questionable'
Matt Garrick and Oliver Chaseling - 26 May 2025
China's ambassador to Australia has fired a warning shot to the Albanese government over its plans to take back the port of Darwin, describing the move as "ethically questionable".
The strategically important northern Australian port has been a hotly debated national security issue since it was leased to Chinese firm Landbridge by the NT government for 99-years in 2015.
During this year's federal election campaign, both Labor and the Coalition made duelling pledges to get the port "back into Australian hands".
Federal Labor has not given a firm indication of exactly how it will do that, but has repeatedly said it has been speaking with Australian firms to possibly take over the lease.
Ambassador Xiao Qian published a statement on his website on Sunday, days after making a trip to Darwin where he said he visited the port and met with staff at Landbridge.
"A decade ago, the Landbridge Group secured the lease for the port of Darwin through an open and transparent bidding process, fully compliant with Australian laws and market principles," he said.
"Over the past 10 years, Landbridge Group has made significant investments in maintaining and building Darwin Port's infrastructure, optimising its operations and management, and expanding its customer sources.
"These efforts have brought remarkable improvements to the port, turning its financial situation from losses to profits and contributing positively to local economic and social development."
Mr Xiao also called on the Northern Territory and federal governments to "honour its binding commitments" under the contract and "respect the autonomous decisions made by businesses made by development needs".
"Such an enterprise and project deserves encouragement, not punishment.
"It is ethically questionable to lease the port when it was unprofitable and then seek to reclaim it once it becomes profitable."
Members of the previous NT government that leased the port to Landbridge have said the decision was made to lease it after the federal government of the day failed to fund needed infrastructure upgrades.
Federal Labor meets with potential port buyers
Federal Labor has not yet given any firm indication when it will move on its election commitment regarding changing ownership of the port.
Last week, MP and special envoy for defence and northern Australia Luke Gosling said he had been meeting with potential buyers.
"We want to make sure that there's a good return on investment for the Chinese owners Landbridge as well," he said.
"We've no interest in blowing this up into anything, or putting a time limit on negotiations.
"The port needs infrastructure development in order to make it more efficient and more effective."
Federal Infrastructure Minister Catherine King said the port was a "critical infrastructure asset of national importance".
"The Australian government is working closely with the Northern Territory government on next steps," she said.
NT Treasurer Bill Yan said his government would work with the Commonwealth in planning for the port's future.
"That will be a federal government matter between them of course and the Chinese ambassador," he said.
Landbridge has repeatedly said that the port is not for sale.
In a statement on Monday, Landbridge's non-executive director for Australia, Terry O'Connor, said Landbridge had "not yet received any engagement from the government at any level".
"It is business as usual at Darwin Port, as we continue to focus on the growth of our operations," he said.
Mr O'Connor also said Landbridge welcomed the Chinese ambassador's comments "in relation to the port's operation and its contribution to the Northern Territory economy".
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-05-26/nt-chinese-ambassador-blasts-darwin-port-lease-plans/105323302
https://x.com/ChineseEmbinAus/status/1925722332422643771
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73571
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23083169 (260951ZMAY25) Notable: Chinese Ambassador urges Australia to objectively view Darwin Port project and honor contractual commitments - "When responding to the Albanese government's pledge during the Australian election campaign to revoke the operating rights of China's Landbridge Group over the Port of Darwin in a joint media interview, Chinese Ambassador to Australia Xiao Qian said that it is ethically questionable to lease the port when it was unprofitable and then seek to reclaim it once it becomes profitable. Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese mentioned in April during the election campaign that his government was working on a plan to force the sale of Darwin Port from its Chinese owner on national interest grounds, Reuters reported. During an interview published on the website of the Chinese Embassy in Australia on Sunday, Xiao said that Chinese side has consistently maintained communication with both the Australian federal government and the Northern Territory government (where the port is located) through diplomatic channels. He elaborated that a decade ago, the Landbridge Group secured the lease for the Port of Darwin through an open and transparent bidding process, fully compliant with Australian laws and market principles. Over the past 10 years, Landbridge Group has made significant investments in maintaining and building Darwin Port's infrastructure, optimizing its operations and management, and expanding its customer sources, said Xiao. China and Australia are comprehensive strategic partners. The two sides should foster mutual trust, as mutually beneficial cooperation aligns with our shared interests. We hope the Australian federal government and the Northern Territory government will create a fair, transparent, and predictable business environment for Chinese enterprises operating in Australia, the ambassador noted." - Global Times - globaltimes.cn
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73569
>>73570
Chinese Ambassador urges Australia to objectively view Darwin Port project and honor contractual commitments
Global Times - May 26, 2025
When responding to the Albanese government's pledge during the Australian election campaign to revoke the operating rights of China's Landbridge Group over the Port of Darwin in a joint media interview, Chinese Ambassador to Australia Xiao Qian said that it is ethically questionable to lease the port when it was unprofitable and then seek to reclaim it once it becomes profitable.
Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese mentioned in April during the election campaign that his government was working on a plan to force the sale of Darwin Port from its Chinese owner on national interest grounds, Reuters reported.
During an interview published on the website of the Chinese Embassy in Australia on Sunday, Xiao said that Chinese side has consistently maintained communication with both the Australian federal government and the Northern Territory government (where the port is located) through diplomatic channels.
He elaborated that a decade ago, the Landbridge Group secured the lease for the Port of Darwin through an open and transparent bidding process, fully compliant with Australian laws and market principles.
Over the past 10 years, Landbridge Group has made significant investments in maintaining and building Darwin Port's infrastructure, optimizing its operations and management, and expanding its customer sources, said Xiao.
He pointed out that these efforts have brought remarkable improvements to the port, turning its financial situation from losses to profits and contributing positively to local economic and social development. Such an enterprise and project deserves encouragement, not punishment. It is ethically questionable to lease the port when it was unprofitable and then seek to reclaim it once it becomes profitable.
Xiao said the lease agreement is a commercial contract. We hope the Australian side will view the Darwin Port project objectively, honor its binding commitments under the contract and respect the autonomous decisions made by businesses based on development needs, he noted.
China and Australia are comprehensive strategic partners. The two sides should foster mutual trust, as mutually beneficial cooperation aligns with our shared interests. We hope the Australian federal government and the Northern Territory government will create a fair, transparent, and predictable business environment for Chinese enterprises operating in Australia, the ambassador noted.
https://www.globaltimes.cn/page/202505/1334834.shtml
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73572
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23087093 (270913ZMAY25) Notable: US eyes Darwin Port prise from Chinese-owned company Landbridge Group - A US private equity firm with strong ties to the Trump administration is poised to make an offer to buy the Port of Darwin from its Chinese owner, in a test of Anthony Albanese’s resolve to bring the port back under Western control. The Australian can reveal New York-based Cerberus Capital Management is preparing a formal proposal to buy the port from Landbridge Group’s billionaire owner Ye Cheng, who is a close confidant of senior Chinese Communist Party figures. It’s understood the investment firm’s offer will be slightly above the $506m that Landbridge paid 10 years ago for its 99-year lease over the facility. The company says the facility is not for sale, but one source said the port operator was open to offers of about $1bn. The Prime Minister warned in the midst of the election campaign that Landbridge must either sell the port voluntarily or it would be forcibly acquired by the government. The US has had longstanding concerns over the port’s Chinese ownership, but Mr Albanese has been facing pressure from Beijing to back down on his pre-election pledge to strip Landbridge of the lease. Cerberus Capital Management was until recently run by co-founder Steve Feinberg, who was appointed in March to be US deputy defence secretary. Representatives from the company met Landbridge Group and Northern Territory Treasurer Bill Yan last week. Chinese ambassador Xiao Qian said forcing the company to give up the lease would be “ethically questionable” given it had secured it through an open and transparent bidding process and made significant investments in the facility since then. “These efforts have brought remarkable improvements to the port, turning its financial situation from losses to profits and contributing positively to local economic and social development,” the ambassador said in comments posted on the Chinese embassy website.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73569
>>73570
US eyes Darwin Port prise from Chinese-owned company Landbridge Group
BEN PACKHAM - 27 May 2025
1/2
A US private equity firm with strong ties to the Trump administration is poised to make an offer to buy the Port of Darwin from its Chinese owner, in a test of Anthony Albanese’s resolve to bring the port back under Western control.
The Australian can reveal New York-based Cerberus Capital Management is preparing a formal proposal to buy the port from Landbridge Group’s billionaire owner Ye Cheng, who is a close confidant of senior Chinese Communist Party figures.
It’s understood the investment firm’s offer will be slightly above the $506m that Landbridge paid 10 years ago for its 99-year lease over the facility. The company says the facility is not for sale, but one source said the port operator was open to offers of about $1bn.
The Prime Minister warned in the midst of the election campaign that Landbridge must either sell the port voluntarily or it would be forcibly acquired by the government. The US has had longstanding concerns over the port’s Chinese ownership, but Mr Albanese has been facing pressure from Beijing to back down on his pre-election pledge to strip Landbridge of the lease.
Cerberus Capital Management was until recently run by co-founder Steve Feinberg, who was appointed in March to be US deputy defence secretary.
Representatives from the company met Landbridge Group and Northern Territory Treasurer Bill Yan last week.
Chinese ambassador Xiao Qian said forcing the company to give up the lease would be “ethically questionable” given it had secured it through an open and transparent bidding process and made significant investments in the facility since then. “These efforts have brought remarkable improvements to the port, turning its financial situation from losses to profits and contributing positively to local economic and social development,” the ambassador said in comments posted on the Chinese embassy website.
“Such an enterprise and project deserves encouragement, not punishment. It is ethically questionable to lease the port when it was unprofitable and then seek to reclaim it once it becomes profitable.”
Alluding to the stabilisation of bilateral ties during the Albanese government’s first term, Mr Xiao said the countries were “comprehensive strategic partners” and should foster “mutual trust”.
Mr Albanese opted to leave the port under Landbridge’s ownership following an October 2023 review by the Department of Prime Minister and Cabinet that found there was “a robust regulatory system” in place to manage any risks. But, in an election campaign move to gazump a Coalition pledge, the Prime Minister said the government wanted the port to be returned to “Australian hands”.
Mr Albanese said the government was looking to find a buyer for the asset, such as an Australian superannuation company. But “if it reaches a point where the commonwealth needs to directly intervene, then we’d be prepared to do that”, he told ABC Darwin.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73573
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23087100 (270921ZMAY25) Notable: Global Times editorial: If Australia forcibly takes back Darwin Port, it will leave behind enduring pitfalls - "As a port operation project obtained through a normal market-oriented and transparent bidding process - and one that has undergone at least three political and security reviews over the past decade unjustly - the Darwin Port operated by China's Landbridge Group has repeatedly become a "political football" in Australian domestic politics. Since the current election cycle, it has come under renewed pressure for destroying the contract and forced takeover by the Australian government. On this issue, Chinese Ambassador to Australia Xiao Qian recently stated in an interview with Chinese and Australian media that China has maintained communication with Australian federal and local governments over the Darwin port through diplomatic channels. He also noted that "It's very morally inappropriate to rent out the port when it is in the red and take it back once it is profitable." It is well known that Darwin Port only became linked to so-called "national security" and subjected to a wave of political and security scrutiny after so-called "concerns" were voiced from Washington. However, recent Australian governments' review have all concluded that there were no so-called "national security risks" associated with the port. The latest review in 2023 even found "not necessary" to cancel or alter the lease. However, the recent surge in rhetoric about tearing up the deal - even being framed during the election campaign as a bipartisan "consensus" - clearly shows that the undercurrents of anti-China sentiment in Australia are once again resurfacing. The operation of Darwin Port is, at its core, a market-driven economic project and should operate within the framework of the rule of law and market principles. However, when pressure from Washington overrides Australia's own national interests, and rule-based commercial activities are trampled by political logic, what suffers is not only Australia's international credibility, but also the fragile foundation of mutual trust and its own strategic autonomy - a space that could have been preserved from external military rivalry. We urge the Australian government to prioritize the broader picture, uphold the spirit of contract, return to the rule of law, and stop distorting economic cooperation with political bias. Whether the Port of Darwin becomes a hub of prosperous trade or the eye of a geopolitical storm is not a difficult choice, but it does test Canberra's strategic wisdom." - Global Times - globaltimes.cn
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73569
>>73570
>>73572
If Australia forcibly takes back Darwin Port, it will leave behind enduring pitfalls: Global Times editorial
Global Times - May 27, 2025
1/2
As a port operation project obtained through a normal market-oriented and transparent bidding process - and one that has undergone at least three political and security reviews over the past decade unjustly - the Darwin Port operated by China's Landbridge Group has repeatedly become a "political football" in Australian domestic politics. Since the current election cycle, it has come under renewed pressure for destroying the contract and forced takeover by the Australian government.
On this issue, Chinese Ambassador to Australia Xiao Qian recently stated in an interview with Chinese and Australian media that China has maintained communication with Australian federal and local governments over the Darwin port through diplomatic channels. He also noted that "It's very morally inappropriate to rent out the port when it is in the red and take it back once it is profitable."
Over the past 10 years, Darwin Port has seen significant transformation. Beyond mutual business benefits, Landbridge Group's role has been a case of timely assistance to the port and the Northern Territory, especially in a context where the then federal government wasn't "interested in supporting the Northern Territory with this infrastructure." From turning the port's operations from loss to profit and helping ease the Northern Territory government's debt crisis, to investing more than AUD 83 million (about $ 55 million) and upgrading port facilities - which led to a 95.7 percent increase in the total gross tonnage (GRT) of arriving vessels - and greatly contributing to local economic and social development, Landbridge Group's involvement has brought systematic and positive changes to Darwin Port. Former Northern Territory minister John Elferink has said the Commonwealth failed to raise any security concerns when it approved the deal at the time.
It is well known that Darwin Port only became linked to so-called "national security" and subjected to a wave of political and security scrutiny after so-called "concerns" were voiced from Washington. However, recent Australian governments' review have all concluded that there were no so-called "national security risks" associated with the port. The latest review in 2023 even found "not necessary" to cancel or alter the lease. However, the recent surge in rhetoric about tearing up the deal - even being framed during the election campaign as a bipartisan "consensus" - clearly shows that the undercurrents of anti-China sentiment in Australia are once again resurfacing.
However, should the Australian government take the drastic step of forcibly taking back Darwin Port, it will undoubtedly leave behind three major enduring pitfalls for the country.
The operations of Landbridge Group at the Darwin Port are a typical example of Chinese enterprises investing and operating overseas in accordance with laws and regulations. If the Australian government were to unilaterally tear up the agreement without legitimate legal grounds, it would send a dangerous signal to global investors: the Australian government may arbitrarily interfere in commercial contracts for political purposes. Such a practice of "politics taking precedence over the rule of law" would seriously undermine foreign investors' confidence in Australia's business environment, especially in sectors like infrastructure and energy that require long-term investment.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73574
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23090704 (281019ZMAY25) Notable: Toll, super funds join suitors for Chinese-owned Darwin Port - Logistics powerhouse Toll is part of a US private equity fund’s bid to buy out the Chinese owner of the Port of Darwin, offering an Australian flavour to a transaction being driven by national security imperatives that superannuation funds are also weighing up. The partnership by Toll and Cerberus Capital Management is just one potential suitor for the port, which is effectively on the market after Prime Minister Anthony Albanese pledged during the election campaign to terminate Chinese company Landbridge’s 99-year lease on the key cargo gateway for northern Australia. Superannuation funds are also running the rule over the port, sources familiar with the matter told The Australian Financial Review, after Albanese indicated he wanted them at the bidding table. Albanese’s promise to take the lease out of Landbridge’s hands is poised to revive diplomatic strains with Beijing after Chinese ambassador Xiao Qian warned it was ethically questionable and the company should not be punished. Two sources, granted anonymity to speak on sensitive matters, said Cerberus had partnered with Toll to take over the port and had already met with the Northern Territory government and political figures, as well as Landbridge representatives, as part of its pitch. Cerberus’ local representative declined to comment on its interest or confirm Toll’s involvement, citing commercial confidentiality. Toll did not respond to a request for comment. One of Australia’s major superannuation-backed asset managers, IFM Investors, also declined to comment on whether it was a prospective buyer. While Cerberus has links to the Trump administration through its co-founder Steve Feinberg, who was appointed to be deputy US defence secretary, the bid appears to have come independently of the US government.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73569
>>73572
Toll, super funds join suitors for Chinese-owned Darwin Port
Andrew Tillett - May 27, 2025
Logistics powerhouse Toll is part of a US private equity fund’s bid to buy out the Chinese owner of the Port of Darwin, offering an Australian flavour to a transaction being driven by national security imperatives that superannuation funds are also weighing up.
The partnership by Toll and Cerberus Capital Management is just one potential suitor for the port, which is effectively on the market after Prime Minister Anthony Albanese pledged during the election campaign to terminate Chinese company Landbridge’s 99-year lease on the key cargo gateway for northern Australia.
Superannuation funds are also running the rule over the port, sources familiar with the matter told The Australian Financial Review, after Albanese indicated he wanted them at the bidding table.
Albanese’s promise to take the lease out of Landbridge’s hands is poised to revive diplomatic strains with Beijing after Chinese ambassador Xiao Qian warned it was ethically questionable and the company should not be punished.
Two sources, granted anonymity to speak on sensitive matters, said Cerberus had partnered with Toll to take over the port and had already met with the Northern Territory government and political figures, as well as Landbridge representatives, as part of its pitch.
Cerberus’ interest was first reported by The Australian newspaper.
Cerberus’ local representative declined to comment on its interest or confirm Toll’s involvement, citing commercial confidentiality. Toll did not respond to a request for comment.
One of Australia’s major superannuation-backed asset managers, IFM Investors, also declined to comment on whether it was a prospective buyer.
While Cerberus has links to the Trump administration through its co-founder Steve Feinberg, who was appointed to be deputy US defence secretary, the bid appears to have come independently of the US government.
Former president Barack Obama directly chided then prime minister Malcolm Turnbull in 2015 that the US had not been kept in the loop over the transaction.
While several reviews have concluded there was no security risk justifying stripping Landbridge’s lease, security sensitivities over the port are high given thousands of US Marines are deployed to Darwin each year and Landbridge has been linked to the Chinese Communist Party and People’s Liberation Army.
Albanese and former opposition leader Peter Dutton both announced during the election campaign they would take the lease off Landbridge.
However, details of how that will occur remain vague. One source said the federal government had not approached potential buyers. Nor has it spoken to Landbridge about ending its lease.
Landbridge insists it is not interested in selling the port after paying $506 million to the Northern Territory government in 2015 for the 99-year lease.
Sources were split on how the final transaction could work. One industry player said a commercial outcome was going to have to be reached because Landbridge was complying with its lease requirements.
Another source said in the light of Landbridge’s determination not to sell the lease, the government would have to use its powers to forcibly acquire the port, and may have to financially support the transaction for the new buyer.
Meanwhile, a new report by the Lowy Institute foreign policy think tank highlights that many of the world’s poorest nations face record high debt repayments to China for infrastructure projects funded by President Xi Jinping’s signature Belt and Road Initiative.
China’s practice of “debt trap diplomacy” has been criticised by Australian and US governments and the institute found debt-servicing flows to China from developing countries will hit $US35 billion ($54 billion) in 2025.
“Now, and for the rest of this decade, China will be more debt collector than banker to the developing world,” research fellow Riley Duke said.
https://www.afr.com/politics/federal/toll-super-funds-join-suitors-for-chinese-owned-darwin-port-20250527-p5m2jc
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73575
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23090715 (281027ZMAY25) Notable: ‘We want it in Australian hands’: Albanese cool on US bid to buy Darwin Port - Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has insisted he wants the Port of Darwin returned to Australian ownership, as an American private equity firm makes a play to buy the strategically significant asset from its Chinese owners. Both Labor and the Coalition announced during the election campaign that they would move to strip Chinese firm Landbridge of its controversial 99-year lease of the port, which sits directly opposite Darwin’s Larrakeyah Defence Precinct. The prospect of a forced divestiture has angered Beijing, which feels Chinese companies are being unfairly singled out for punishment over national security concerns. Albanese also downplayed the prospect of joining any international effort to impose sanctions on leading Israeli politicians over the war in Gaza and settlement building in the occupied West Bank, despite a call from Labor elder statesman Gareth Evans to sanction Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and two of his far-right cabinet members. Asked if he would support a bid by US investment firm Cerberus to buy the port, Albanese told reporters: “We’ve said we want to see it in Australian hands. I notice this speculation which is there, but we’ll examine the process. We’re determined to make sure it’s in the national interest for it to be in Australian hands.” He left some wriggle room on overseas offers, saying: “But if there are other proposals, we’ll work those through. But we’ll work those through on a commercial basis.”
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73569
>>73572
>>73574
‘We want it in Australian hands’: Albanese cool on US bid to buy Darwin Port
Matthew Knott - May 28, 2025
1/2
Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has insisted he wants the Port of Darwin returned to Australian ownership, as an American private equity firm makes a play to buy the strategically significant asset from its Chinese owners.
Both Labor and the Coalition announced during the election campaign that they would move to strip Chinese firm Landbridge of its controversial 99-year lease of the port, which sits directly opposite Darwin’s Larrakeyah Defence Precinct.
The prospect of a forced divestiture has angered Beijing, which feels Chinese companies are being unfairly singled out for punishment over national security concerns.
Albanese also downplayed the prospect of joining any international effort to impose sanctions on leading Israeli politicians over the war in Gaza and settlement building in the occupied West Bank, despite a call from Labor elder statesman Gareth Evans to sanction Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and two of his far-right cabinet members.
Asked if he would support a bid by US investment firm Cerberus to buy the port, Albanese told reporters: “We’ve said we want to see it in Australian hands. I notice this speculation which is there, but we’ll examine the process. We’re determined to make sure it’s in the national interest for it to be in Australian hands.”
He left some wriggle room on overseas offers, saying: “But if there are other proposals, we’ll work those through. But we’ll work those through on a commercial basis.”
Labor has been keen for Australian superannuation firms to investigate taking control of the port.
During a visit to Darwin last week, Chinese ambassador Xiao Qian said Landbridge should not be forced to end its lease of the port.
“Such an enterprise and project deserves encouragement, not punishment,” Xiao said. “It is ethically questionable to lease the port when it was unprofitable and then seek to reclaim it once it becomes profitable.
“China and Australia are comprehensive strategic partners. The two sides should foster mutual trust, as mutually beneficial co-operation aligns with our shared interests.”
Landbridge, which secured its long-term lease of the port in 2015 for $506 million, has insisted that the port is not for sale and that it has no intention of ending its lease.
“Landbridge has not yet received any offers or engagement from the government at any level,” non-executive director Terry O’Connor said.
“It is business as usual at Darwin Port, as we continue to focus on the growth of our operations.”
Defence Industry Minister Pat Conroy struck a similar tone to Albanese’s when asked whether the government would support US ownership of the port.
“We’ve been very clear that we want to see the port back in Australian hands,” he said.
“We’re going through the process now of looking through all the options, but our commitment is, at the end of the process, the Port of Darwin will be in Australian hands.”
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73576
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23090760 (281049ZMAY25) Notable: Video: Darwin man, 68, allegedly livestreamed horrific acts of child sexual abuse - A Darwin man has faced court after allegedly exploiting six children in the Philippines by livestreaming sexual abuse online. The 68-year-old man appeared in Darwin Local Court charged with allegedly directing the sexual abuse of young children, as he watched the crimes live on video from another location. NT JACET, comprising members of Australian Federal Police and Northern Territory Police, started an investigation after Australian Border Force officers allegedly found child abuse material on his phone. He had been selected for a bag check on his arrival in Darwin on New Year’s Day when his phone was checked as part of the search. Police later found explicit videos and images of children, as well as video calls from the man to facilitators in the Philippines instructing them to livestream sexual abuse of children as young as six. Investigators executed a search warrant on January 3 at Dinah Beach where the man had been living in a vehicle and yacht and made the arrest. He first appeared in court on January 7 and was remanded in custody to reappear on May 27. NT JACET provided information to AFP members in Manila, which led to an investigation by Philippines National Police (PNP). Philippines authorities arrested two Philippine nationals and removed six children from harm in April. The Darwin man has been charged with two counts of sexual intercourse with a child outside Australia, two counts of sexual activity with a child outside Australia and one count of possessing child abuse material.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Darwin man, 68, allegedly livestreamed horrific acts of child sexual abuse
A Darwin man who allegedly exploited six children as young as six in the Philippines, livestreaming horrific acts of sexual abuse, was found out during an airport baggage examination.
Nathaniel Chambers and Harry Brill - May 28, 2025
A Darwin man has faced court after allegedly exploiting six children in the Philippines by livestreaming sexual abuse online.
The 68-year-old man appeared in Darwin Local Court charged with allegedly directing the sexual abuse of young children, as he watched the crimes live on video from another location.
NT JACET, comprising members of Australian Federal Police and Northern Territory Police, started an investigation after Australian Border Force officers allegedly found child abuse material on his phone.
He had been selected for a bag check on his arrival in Darwin on New Year’s Day when his phone was checked as part of the search.
Police later found explicit videos and images of children, as well as video calls from the man to facilitators in the Philippines instructing them to livestream sexual abuse of children as young as six.
Investigators executed a search warrant on January 3 at Dinah Beach where the man had been living in a vehicle and yacht and made the arrest.
He first appeared in court on January 7 and was remanded in custody to reappear on May 27.
NT JACET provided information to AFP members in Manila, which led to an investigation by Philippines National Police (PNP).
Philippines authorities arrested two Philippine nationals and removed six children from harm in April.
The Darwin man has been charged with two counts of sexual intercourse with a child outside Australia, two counts of sexual activity with a child outside Australia and one count of possessing child abuse material.
The defendant did not appear and was represented by his lawyer.
The prosecution requested an adjournment as they needed to obtain “outstanding material” which would be presented to the court.
The matter was adjourned to June 24 for a preliminary examination.
AFP Superintendent Greg Davis said AFP said the protection of children is one of the AFP’s highest priorities.
“All victims of child sexual exploitation experience lifelong harm because of the selfish actions of their abusers,” Supt Davis said.
“The AFP will continue to work closely with local, Commonwealth and international partners to protect children from sickening abuse, and together identify offenders and bring them before the courts.”
Philippine National Police Brigadier General Portia B Manalad said PNP and the AFP continued to collaborate on child exploitation cases to achieve results such as this.
“The PNP Women and Children Protection Centre will continue to locate alleged offenders and rescue victims with the assistance of our foreign partners,” Brigadier General Manalad said.
NT Police Senior Sergeant Toby Wilson said the possession and distribution of child abuse material caused immeasurable harm to vulnerable children.
“Our team remains committed to pursuing offenders relentlessly and protecting the community against child exploitation,” he said.
ABF Commander Tracie Griffin said the arrest was a reminder that the vigilance of ABF officers at Australia’s border was absolutely critical in protecting the most vulnerable.
“I want to commend the work of the ABF officers involved in the alleged discovery of child abuse material on this man’s phone,” Commander Griffin said.
“Six children are safe because of their diligence and the work of our domestic and international law enforcement partners.”
https://www.ntnews.com.au/truecrimeaustralia/police-courts-nt/courts-darwin-man-68-allegedly-livestreamed-horrific-acts-of-child-sexual-abuse/news-story/78d289528a7135bd715140f1f97d09f3
https://www.afp.gov.au/news-centre/media-release/six-children-removed-harm-philippines-after-darwin-man-charged-alleged
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73577
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23094566 (290953ZMAY25) Notable: Pacific Island nations support China's Taiwan claims at high-profile foreign ministers' meeting - Pacific nations have backed China's claim over Taiwan during a high-profile meeting, but have shied away from directly endorsing Beijing's push to "reunify" the democratically ruled island with the mainland. China has also taken a shot at the United States over climate policy, promising to work with the region to combat climate shocks despite the Trump administration's decision to abandon the Paris Agreement. China's Foreign Minister Wang Yi yesterday sat down with foreign ministers from eight Pacific nations - along with senior officials from three others — in the southern city of Xiamen. It's the third time China has held a meeting with Pacific foreign ministers, but it's the first time the event has been held in person rather than online, and Beijing has trumpeted the gathering as a major milestone. China has long been pushing to expand its influence throughout the region, and analysts say the Trump administration's sweeping global tariffs and aid cuts will open up more opportunities for it. Beijing has also been intent on building global support for its increasingly forceful stance on Taiwan, which it has pledged to bring under its control. A joint statement issued after the meeting declared that all the Pacific nations "recognise that there is but one China in the world, that Taiwan is an inalienable part of China's territory, and that the government of the People's Republic of China is the sole legal government representing the whole of China". But the statement doesn't explicitly and directly endorse the Chinese government's push to take Taiwan, as Pacific nations like Solomon Islands and Kiribati did last year. It uses slightly softer language instead, reiterating China's determination to "realising national reunification" and saying this commitment "gained wide understanding and support at the meeting".
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73560
>>73475
Pacific Island nations support China's Taiwan claims at high-profile foreign ministers' meeting
Stephen Dziedzic - 29 May 2025
1/2
Pacific nations have backed China's claim over Taiwan during a high-profile meeting, but have shied away from directly endorsing Beijing's push to "reunify" the democratically ruled island with the mainland.
China has also taken a shot at the United States over climate policy, promising to work with the region to combat climate shocks despite the Trump administration's decision to abandon the Paris Agreement.
China's Foreign Minister Wang Yi yesterday sat down with foreign ministers from eight Pacific nations — along with senior officials from three others — in the southern city of Xiamen.
It's the third time China has held a meeting with Pacific foreign ministers, but it's the first time the event has been held in person rather than online, and Beijing has trumpeted the gathering as a major milestone.
China has long been pushing to expand its influence throughout the region, and analysts say the Trump administration's sweeping global tariffs and aid cuts will open up more opportunities for it.
Beijing has also been intent on building global support for its increasingly forceful stance on Taiwan, which it has pledged to bring under its control.
A joint statement issued after the meeting declared that all the Pacific nations "recognise that there is but one China in the world, that Taiwan is an inalienable part of China's territory, and that the government of the People's Republic of China is the sole legal government representing the whole of China".
But the statement doesn't explicitly and directly endorse the Chinese government's push to take Taiwan, as Pacific nations like Solomon Islands and Kiribati did last year.
It uses slightly softer language instead, reiterating China's determination to "realising national reunification" and saying this commitment "gained wide understanding and support at the meeting".
Dr Anna Powles from Massey University said Beijing would have been hoping for clearer backing on Taiwan at the meeting.
"Unlike previous years, the statement devotes considerable attention to the Taiwan issue including more forceful language on national reunification," she said.
"That said, the Pacific Island nations' position is ambiguous with reference to 'understanding and support' falling short of an endorsement of reunification which would have been Beijing's objective."
The three Pacific nations which still recognise Taiwan rather than Beijing — namely Palau, Tuvalu and the Republic of Marshall Islands — weren't at the gathering.
The joint statement also doesn't directly endorse China's efforts to expand security and policing cooperation with Pacific Island nations, although Beijing pledged in a separate outcomes document to hold another dialogue on police training with the Pacific before the end of the year.
Dr Powles said that China "continues to present itself as an alternative security and policing partner to Pacific Island countries".
"However it is less clear how widespread support is amongst Pacific countries with the exception of Solomon Islands and Kiribati," she said.
"Three ministerial dialogues on policing and law enforcement have already been held without substantive region-wide outcomes so far."
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73578
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23103541 (311437ZMAY25) Notable: Video: PM insists biosecurity is 'first priority' as beef tops agenda in upcoming US trade talks - Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has vowed not to compromise biosecurity as trade negotiations over beef are set to top the agenda in crucial talks with US President Donald Trump. Trump singled out Australia's ban on US beef during a Liberation Day tariff announcement in April, claiming Australia "won't take any of our beef" due to a concern over mad cow disease. Cattle Australia disputes that claim, because a ban on US beef was lifted in 2019, provided the cattle is born, raised and slaughtered in the US. But concerns over "mixed herds" mean beef from the US rarely makes it to Australian plates. US exporters are currently unable to prove their herds don't include beef that was born in Mexico and Canada, which are still rated a biosecurity risk, then later slaughtered in the US. "We haven't been assured there's a system that allows the appropriate tracing of animals, or appropriate traceback of animals," Cattle Australia chief executive Dr Chris Parker said. A review is underway into whether that should change, which could be used as a bargaining chip for Trump to drop all tariffs against Australia.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73550
‘Unjustified’: Donald Trump claims steel tariff will double, as Australia lashes surprise move
BLAIR JACKSON and THOMAS HENRY - 31 May 2025
1/2
Donald Trump has claimed the tariff rate on steel will double to 50 per cent, drawing the ire of the Australian government.
The US President blurted out the latest development in his trade war at a steel mill rally in Pennsylvania, on Saturday morning Australian time.
Australian Trade Minister Don Farrell said the latest tariff hike was unjustified.
Mr Farrell has flagged a meeting, brokered by US Ambassador Kevin Rudd, with US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer in Paris sometime next week.
“This is certainly not the act of a friend, we’ve had a very long and trusting relationship with the United States... We’re going to coolly and calmly argue for the removal of these tariffs,” Minister Farrell said.
The Labor minister pointed to the government’s track record negotiating with China on tariffs imposed on Australian products during the Morrison government.
He will also meet with Chinese trade representatives on Monday for the 10th time which he says will ensure continued “tariff-free” trade with the nation’s biggest trading partner.
Earlier in the day, Mr Farrell said Australia’s position had been consistent and clear. “These tariffs are ... an act of economic self harm that will only hurt consumers and businesses who rely on free and fair trade.
“We will continue to engage and advocate strongly for the removal of the tariffs.”
US government data shows the price of steel products into the US have increased by 16 per cent since Trump’s second term began.
Australian car parts, steel and aluminium are currently being slapped with a 25 per cent levy, as per Trump’s sweeping protectionist policies.
Meanwhile, in Singapore Defence Minister Richard Marles also took a swipe at the Trump administration’s tariff agenda while also welcoming the assurance by US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth that allies in the Indo-Pacific will not be left alone to face increasing military and economic pressure from China.
“Reality is that there is no effective balance of power in this region absent the United States, but we cannot leave it to the United States alone,” he said, agreeing that Australia and other nations needed to do their part..
But the Australian Defence Minister also suggested the Trump administration’s aggressive trade policies were counterproductive.
“The shock and disruption from the high tariffs has been costly and destabilising,” he said, responding to Hegseth’s keynote speech at a security conference in Singapore.
Opposition shadow Trade Minister Kevin Hogan said the move was “concerning for Australian jobs” while calling on the government to “double its efforts to protect our steel industry”.
“The strength of our economic partnership has been built on trust and mutual benefit, and any deviation from this agreement undermines the principles of free trade,” he said in a statement.
“This is why it is imperative that the Australian Prime Minister personally meets with President Trump, as he is expected to do on the sidelines of the G7 in Canada in a couple of weeks.”
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73579
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23103570 (311445ZMAY25) Notable: Video: ‘Real and could be imminent’: Hegseth warns on China threat, says US ready to fight - US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth has delivered a blistering warning to China that America stands ready to “fight and win decisively” if it seeks military conflict over Taiwan, declaring the threat posed is real and could be imminent. In a strident speech to top defence officials from across the Indo-Pacific, Hegseth said the region was America’s “priority theatre” and declared the Trump administration had a renewed focus on deterring China. He said the US would not instigate conflict with China or seek regime change, but in a significant declaration of policy said “we will not be pushed out of this critical region, and we will not let our allies and partners be subordinated and intimidated”. “There’s no reason to sugar coat it. The threat China poses is real, and it could be imminent,” he said in the speech to the Shangri-La Dialogue in Singapore, Asia’s leading security conference. America’s goal was to prevent war through forceful deterrence, he said - but if that failed, the US would act. “If deterrence fails and if called upon by my commander in chief, we are prepared to do what the Department of Defence does best, to fight and win decisively,” Hegseth said. Hegseth’s remarks are some of the strongest to date from the Trump administration about its preparedness to defend the Indo-Pacific with military force in the face of increasing Chinese territorial aggression in the Taiwan Strait and South China Sea. He also used the speech on Saturday to press US partners in Asia to boost defence spending towards 5 per cent of gross domestic product. Hegseth had already pushed his Australian counterpart, Richard Marles, to ramp up defence spending to counter China’s increasing assertiveness. Marles declined to divulge what figure the pair discussed, but the demand would likely mean billions of dollars in extra defence funding.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73560
>>73555
‘Real and could be imminent’: Hegseth warns on China threat, says US ready to fight
Lisa Visentin - May 31, 2025
1/2
Singapore: US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth has delivered a blistering warning to China that America stands ready to “fight and win decisively” if it seeks military conflict over Taiwan, declaring the threat posed is real and could be imminent.
In a strident speech to top defence officials from across the Indo-Pacific, Hegseth said the region was America’s “priority theatre” and declared the Trump administration had a renewed focus on deterring China.
He said the US would not instigate conflict with China or seek regime change, but in a significant declaration of policy said “we will not be pushed out of this critical region, and we will not let our allies and partners be subordinated and intimidated”.
Hegseth’s remarks are some of the strongest to date from the Trump administration about its preparedness to defend the Indo-Pacific with military force in the face of increasing Chinese territorial aggression in the Taiwan Strait and South China Sea.
He also used the speech on Saturday to press US partners in Asia to boost defence spending towards 5 per cent of gross domestic product.
Hegseth had already pushed his Australian counterpart, Richard Marles, to ramp up defence spending to counter China’s increasing assertiveness. Marles declined to divulge what figure the pair discussed, but the demand would likely mean billions of dollars in extra defence funding.
Hegseth’s position statement will be judged by political leaders against the backdrop of recent US action seen to have fostered uncertainty across the region, including the threat of steep tariffs on many Asian countries and the dismantling of US foreign aid programs that experts have warned will create a soft-power vacuum for China to fill.
Repeating US intelligence claims that Chinese President Xi Jinping had ordered the People’s Liberation Army be ready to execute a takeover of Taiwan by 2027, Hegseth said this would result in devastating consequences for the world
“There’s no reason to sugar coat it. The threat China poses is real, and it could be imminent,” he said in the speech to the Shangri-La Dialogue in Singapore, Asia’s leading security conference.
America’s goal was to prevent war through forceful deterrence, he said – but if that failed, the US would act.
“If deterrence fails and if called upon by my commander in chief, we are prepared to do what the Department of Defence does best, to fight and win decisively,” Hegseth said.
The Lowy Institute’s Susannah Patton, director of the think tank’s South-East Asia program, said the speech would be well-received by US allies such as Australia and Japan because it continued the previous administration’s commitment to defence co-operation in Asia.
“But the starkly confrontational tone on China won’t reassure South-east Asian countries who worry about the risk of rising tensions or conflict,” she said.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73580
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23103619 (311454ZMAY25) Notable: ‘Peace through strength’: Marles backs Hegseth after ‘stark’ China warning - Defence Minister Richard Marles has endorsed a blistering address by his US counterpart warning China that America stands ready to “fight and win decisively” if Beijing seeks military conflict over Taiwan. In a strident speech to top defence officials from across the Indo-Pacific on Saturday, US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth said the region was America’s “priority theatre” and that the threat posed by China is real - and potentially imminent. Speaking to this masthead after the address - the first major declaration of the Trump administration’s Indo-Pacific policy – Marles described it as “a very clear articulation of American intent, that what they seek is peace through strength”. “It gives us a lot to work with in terms of working with this administration … there was a really clear focus on allies and partners,” Marles said in an interview on the sidelines of the Shangri-La Security Dialogue, Asia’s premier defence summit, in Singapore on Saturday. “One of our key concerns is that we have witnessed with China the biggest conventional military build-up of any country since the end of the Second World War, and that has happened without strategic reassurance or transparency.” Hegseth used his speech to send the message that the US would not instigate conflict with China or seek regime change, while reassuring allies the US was prepared to defend the region in the face of China’s increasing territorial aggression in the Taiwan Strait and South China Sea, saying “we will not let our allies and partners be subordinated and intimidated”. Hegseth also made clear the Trump administration would push its Asian allies to ramp up defence spending to near 5 per cent of gross domestic product, in line with commitments by NATO partners, which he claimed were spending more to combat a less formidable threat.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73560
>>73555
>>73579
‘Peace through strength’: Marles backs Hegseth after ‘stark’ China warning
Lisa Visentin - May 31, 2025
1/2
Singapore: Defence Minister Richard Marles has endorsed a blistering address by his US counterpart warning China that America stands ready to “fight and win decisively” if Beijing seeks military conflict over Taiwan.
In a strident speech to top defence officials from across the Indo-Pacific on Saturday, US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth said the region was America’s “priority theatre” and that the threat posed by China is real – and potentially imminent.
Speaking to this masthead after the address – the first major declaration of the Trump administration’s Indo-Pacific policy – Marles described it as “a very clear articulation of American intent, that what they seek is peace through strength”.
“It gives us a lot to work with in terms of working with this administration ... there was a really clear focus on allies and partners,” Marles said in an interview on the sidelines of the Shangri-La Security Dialogue, Asia’s premier defence summit, in Singapore on Saturday.
“One of our key concerns is that we have witnessed with China the biggest conventional military build-up of any country since the end of the Second World War, and that has happened without strategic reassurance or transparency.”
Hegseth used his speech to send the message that the US would not instigate conflict with China or seek regime change, while reassuring allies the US was prepared to defend the region in the face of China’s increasing territorial aggression in the Taiwan Strait and South China Sea, saying “we will not let our allies and partners be subordinated and intimidated”.
“There’s no reason to sugar coat it. The threat China poses is real, and it could be imminent,” he said. “If deterrence fails and if called upon by my commander-in-chief, we are prepared to do what the Department of Defence does best, to fight and win decisively.”
Hegseth also made clear the Trump administration would push its Asian allies to ramp up defence spending to near 5 per cent of gross domestic product, in line with commitments by NATO partners, which he claimed were spending more to combat a less formidable threat.
It’s a pressure he applied to Marles when the pair met for face-to-face talks on Friday. Marles declined to divulge what spending figure the pair discussed, but the demand would likely mean billions of dollars in extra defence funding.
Hegseth’s reassurance of the US’s commitment to the Indo-Pacific is one that many of the region’s political leaders would be seeking – but not necessarily trust.
In the frenzied early months of the Trump administration, trading partners have been threatened with high tariffs, crucial aid development programs have been axed, and rock-solid alliances have been rattled by signals the US is embracing a more isolationist position on the global stage.
Asked whether any of the Trump administration’s actions had shaken his faith in the reliability of the US as Australia’s foremost ally, Marles reaffirmed that the US alliance remained the cornerstone of Australia’s strategic and foreign policy.
But he added “we will say what needs to be said, even to our close ally”.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73581
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23103697 (311510ZMAY25) Notable: ‘Is your father your abuser?’ Breaking free of the shame of decades of sexual abuse - Beck Rogers’ case, according to experienced police officers, is the worst case of incest they have encountered. While sharing it with us, her health suffered. And yet she is resolute in the hope that her story will reach someone who is suffering in silence. The first step across the threshold of a police station is the hardest one to take for sexual assault victims. In April 2023, Beck Rogers trembled as she entered the Sexual Offences and Child Abuse Investigation Team (SOCIT) office at Frankston in Melbourne’s southeast. Her husband, Will, had done the research. Don’t go to a police station, he told her. A Google search urged victims of sexual abuse to go directly to one of the 28 SOCIT offices in Victoria. Beck felt a wave of nausea and her head pounded, but she pushed on. She was ushered into an interview room. Her mind raced. Where to start? How to unravel 36 years of sustained torture? Beck had suffered a lifetime of protracted sexual abuse, emotional control and financial coercion committed wilfully and frequently by her father. In telling this story to The Australian Weekend Magazine, Beck Rogers has decided not to hide behind an alias. She is now 41, a wife and a mother. Not long ago, it would have been almost impossible to share her experience publicly in this way. She would have been tied up in suppression orders that ancient lawmakers had deemed were put in place for her own protection. Beck’s first memory of life was sitting in the bath at her Frankston home. She was three years of age and her father had touched her indecently. The last episode of sexual abuse would take place over three decades later. Beck’s story, according to experienced police officers, is the worst case of incest they have encountered. While sharing it with The Australian Weekend Magazine, the frequency of her seizures increased. Beck cannot drive a car and is unable to work. And yet she is resolute in the hope her story will reach someone who is suffering in silence. “I just want to help other people,” she says. “I often think if I had known about the stories of other people in similar situations, I would have come forward much earlier.” Having the courage to go to the police put an end to her father’s abuse forever. Her story is one of survival - and telling it is an extraordinary act of generosity and a signal to victims that sharing their truth can set them free.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
‘Is your father your abuser?’ Breaking free of the shame of decades of sexual abuse
Beck Rogers’ case, according to experienced police officers, is the worst case of incest they have encountered. While sharing it with us, her health suffered. And yet she is resolute in the hope that her story will reach someone who is suffering in silence.
PETER HOYSTED - 31 May 2025
1/4
The first step across the threshold of a police station is the hardest one to take for sexual assault victims. In April 2023, Beck Rogers trembled as she entered the Sexual Offences and Child Abuse Investigation Team (SOCIT) office at Frankston in Melbourne’s southeast. Her husband, Will, had done the research. Don’t go to a police station, he told her. A Google search urged victims of sexual abuse to go directly to one of the 28 SOCIT offices in Victoria.
Beck felt a wave of nausea and her head pounded, but she pushed on. She was ushered into an interview room. Her mind raced. Where to start? How to unravel 36 years of sustained torture? Beck had suffered a lifetime of protracted sexual abuse, emotional control and financial coercion committed wilfully and frequently by her father.
In telling this story to The Australian Weekend Magazine, Beck Rogers has decided not to hide behind an alias. She is now 41, a wife and a mother. Not long ago, it would have been almost impossible to share her experience publicly in this way. She would have been tied up in suppression orders that ancient lawmakers had deemed were put in place for her own protection.
Beck’s first memory of life was sitting in the bath at her Frankston home. She was three years of age and her father had touched her indecently. The last episode of sexual abuse would take place over three decades later.
A male detective sitting across the table took notes as she spoke. Beck found him impassive and intimidating, if not downright scary as he initially played devil’s advocate, warning her that if her story was contrived or fabricated she could face criminal charges. A female social worker sat in, too, her kind eyes and gentle smile a merciful contrast to the detective’s stony face. Beck pressed on and the detective’s tone would begin to soften. Beck could tell she was believed. She left the SOCIT office 45 minutes later, with a police business card and a promise that she would receive a call within days. A week later, she was summoned to the SOCIT office again. Detective Senior Constable Kathy Squire had been assigned to her case. Squire had read the notes taken at the preliminary interview and was aghast. She had been investigating sexual assaults for 30 years but had never seen anything quite like this.
As a professional, Squire kept her emotions in check. Her job delves into humanity at its worst. Maintaining distance between herself and victims was necessary. Yet she has a heart.
“I was immediately drawn to Beck,” Squire tells this Magazine. “Her smile was infectious but I knew it concealed horrific abuse.”
The two women bonded as Beck’s life was stripped bare. Beck’s statement was prepared during four separate sittings over two weeks. The first would take seven hours, the second the same, then six hours and finally two.
Outwardly Beck’s demeanour was determined and resolved, but she would find the process exhausting, triggering and re-traumatising. She had night terrors, shrieking herself to consciousness from intermittent sleep. Beck has suffered from seizures for much of her adult life. At first she was treated for epilepsy. Later, she was diagnosed with Functional Neurological Disorder, a trauma-related condition. The seizures became more frequent after she decided to confront her past, but she was determined to push on.
It had been a warm February evening in 2023 when Beck decided the abuse had to end. She and Will had arrived at her father’s home for dinner. Over pasta her father, Stephen Colwill, asked the couple if they would take out a mortgage on his home. He was struggling with the payments, he said, seemingly untroubled by the fact that Beck and Will were renting and saving for their own home. Beck suddenly saw what her father’s begging meant. The coercion would never end.
“It was like a gut punch. I felt sick in the pit of my stomach,” she says. She dashed to the toilet and was violently ill. It was the last straw on a long list of her father’s sins.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73582
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23106959 (010907ZJUN25) Notable: ‘We’ll determine our defence policy’: PM pushes back on Hegseth pressure over China - Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has pushed back on US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth’s calls for Australia to ramp up its defence spending to counter China’s growing assertiveness in the Indo-Pacific region. Hegseth made the request to Defence Minister Richard Marles when the pair met on Friday on the sidelines of the Shangri-La Dialogue security forum in Singapore, where the US defence chief later delivered a strident speech warning China posed a real and potentially imminent threat to the region. But on Sunday, Albanese defended Australia’s defence spending and policy settings when asked about Hegseth’s remarks, and whether Australia would lift its defence budget to 3 per cent of gross domestic product - the figure the Trump administration has previously nominated. “What we’ll do is we’ll determine our defence policy, and we’ve invested just across the forward [estimates], an additional $10 billion in defence. What we’ll do is continue to provide for investing in our capability but also investing in our relationships in the region,” Albanese said at a press conference in Tasmania. “Our position with regard to Taiwan is very clear, has been for a long period of time, which is a bipartisan position to support the status quo.” The prime minister’s comments on defence spending contrast with those made by Marles, who has also defended the government’s investment but has said that Australia was “absolutely up for having this conversation” with the US about increasing it further.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73579
>>73580
‘We’ll determine our defence policy’: PM pushes back on Hegseth pressure over China
Lisa Visentin - June 1, 2025
Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has pushed back on US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth’s calls for Australia to ramp up its defence spending to counter China’s growing assertiveness in the Indo-Pacific region.
Hegseth made the request to Defence Minister Richard Marles when the pair met on Friday on the sidelines of the Shangri-La Dialogue security forum in Singapore, where the US defence chief later delivered a strident speech warning China posed a real and potentially imminent threat to the region.
But on Sunday, Albanese defended Australia’s defence spending and policy settings when asked about Hegseth’s remarks, and whether Australia would lift its defence budget to 3 per cent of gross domestic product – the figure the Trump administration has previously nominated.
“What we’ll do is we’ll determine our defence policy, and we’ve invested just across the forward [estimates], an additional $10 billion in defence. What we’ll do is continue to provide for investing in our capability but also investing in our relationships in the region,” Albanese said at a press conference in Tasmania.
“Our position with regard to Taiwan is very clear, has been for a long period of time, which is a bipartisan position to support the status quo.”
The prime minister’s comments on defence spending contrast with those made by Marles, who has also defended the government’s investment but has said that Australia was “absolutely up for having this conversation” with the US about increasing it further.
Hegseth’s speech at the dialogue, delivered to an audience of top defence officials on Saturday, has also provoked a furious response from China, which said he had “smeared and attacked China”. It accused the US of being the “biggest factor undermining peace and stability in the Asia-Pacific region”.
“The United States has deployed offensive weapons in the South China Sea, fanned the flames and created tensions in the Asia-Pacific region, turning the Asia-Pacific region into a ‘powder keg’, causing deep concern among regional countries,” China’s foreign ministry said in a statement.
China warned the US it should “not play with fire” over the Taiwan issue, taking aim at Hegseth’s comments that any attempt by China to conquer Taiwan “would result in devastating consequences”.
China claims Taiwan – a self-governing democracy – as its own territory, despite the Chinese Communist Party never having controlled the island.
In his speech, the first major declaration of the Trump administration’s Indo-Pacific policy, Hegseth said the US would not instigate conflict with China or seek regime change but if deterrence failed, the US was prepared to “fight and win decisively”.
“There’s no reason to sugar-coat it. The threat China poses is real, and it could be imminent,” Hegseth said.
Marles, who endorsed Hegseth’s speech as a clear articulation of American intent to seek peace through strength, rejected China’s assertions that US policy was destabilising the region.
“We have worked with the United States and other countries in the region over a long period of time to uphold the global rules to see that the way in which countries engage with each other is not based on a question of might and power, but rather on the basis of law and rules,” Marles said on Sunday.
https://www.smh.com.au/world/asia/we-ll-determine-our-defence-policy-pm-pushes-back-on-hegseth-pressure-over-china-20250601-p5m3xo.html
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73583
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23106961 (010912ZJUN25) Notable: Video: PM insists biosecurity is 'first priority' as beef tops agenda in upcoming US trade talks - Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has vowed not to compromise biosecurity as trade negotiations over beef are set to top the agenda in crucial talks with US President Donald Trump. Trump singled out Australia's ban on US beef during a Liberation Day tariff announcement in April, claiming Australia "won't take any of our beef" due to a concern over mad cow disease. Cattle Australia disputes that claim, because a ban on US beef was lifted in 2019, provided the cattle is born, raised and slaughtered in the US. But concerns over "mixed herds" mean beef from the US rarely makes it to Australian plates. US exporters are currently unable to prove their herds don't include beef that was born in Mexico and Canada, which are still rated a biosecurity risk, then later slaughtered in the US. "We haven't been assured there's a system that allows the appropriate tracing of animals, or appropriate traceback of animals," Cattle Australia chief executive Dr Chris Parker said. A review is underway into whether that should change, which could be used as a bargaining chip for Trump to drop all tariffs against Australia.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73550
>>73578
Albanese urged to confront Trump in person after doubling down on tariffs
Paul Sakkal - June 1, 2025
Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has condemned Donald Trump’s latest tariff salvo on Australian metals, describing it as reckless as the opposition urged Albanese to confront the US president about the trade strikes during a coming meeting.
On Saturday, Trump said he would double tariffs on steel and aluminium imports to 50 per cent, days after the Court of International Trade found Trump had overstepped his authority to enact a baseline 10 per cent blanket tariff on all types of goods.
The steel and aluminium tariffs were underpinned by a different set of laws to the 10 per cent across-the-board tariff, meaning Australia must secure an exemption to get out of it.
The US eliminated tariffs on British steel and aluminium in a deal with UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer in May, creating a precedent for Australia to strike a similar agreement when Albanese and Trump meet for the first time this month. They are expected to meet either on the sidelines of the G7 summit in Canada or during a trip to the US.
Speaking in Hobart on Sunday, Albanese said the new trade barrier, which will affect about $1 billion worth of Australian metal exports, represented an “inappropriate action by the Trump Administration”.
“This is an act of economic self-harm by the United States that will increase the cost for consumers in the United States,” he said, echoing the language he used after Trump’s Liberation Day tariffs.
“Because it is [applied] across the board, what it will do is not create any comparative advantage or disadvantage for Australia compared with other countries that export into the United States. This is something that will just increase the cost for consumers in the United States.”
Opposition finance spokesman James Paterson said Trump’s move was a blow to Australia. He added that he agreed with the comments of Labor ministers on the subject, appearing to break from previous Coalition leader Peter Dutton’s tactic of claiming the opposition could secure a better deal from Trump.
Paterson urged Albanese to be “respectful but assertive” when he met Trump.
“This is not consistent with the US-Australia free trade agreement,” he said on Sky News. “He’s got to robustly stand up for Australia’s national interest.”
Paterson said it was critical for Australia to help preserve global trading rules because, as a small national reliant on trade, they were key to Australia’s prosperity.
America enjoys a trade surplus with Australia, making it one of the few countries where it sells more than the other nation buys. The US sold $US17.9 billion ($27.8 billion) more goods to Australia in 2024.
Australia exported $640 million worth of steel and $440 million worth of aluminium last year to the US. The cumulative $1 billion worth of metals trade is a small amount compared with the nation’s total exports of $660 billion in the past financial year.
Trump announced the doubling of steel and aluminium tariffs during a visit to the Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, headquarters of US Steel, in front of a crowd of workers in high-vis vests and hardhats.
“At 25 per cent they can sort of get over that fence. At 50 per cent they can no longer get over the fence,” Trump said. “Nobody’s going to get around that … Nobody’s going to be able to steal your industry.”
The steel and aluminium tariffs were enacted under trade laws rather than the emergency powers Trump used to levy a 10 per cent across-the-board tariff. The Court of International Trade last week found that Trump had overstepped his authority on the baseline 10 per cent tariff, but those tariffs will remain in place for now after a federal appeals court agreed to temporarily preserve them while the Trump administration pursued an appeal.
The matter is likely to be decided by the US Supreme Court.
Employment and Workplace Relations Minister Amanda Rishworth called the doubling of metal tariffs “unjustifiable”.
“This continues to be a difficult area, but one that we will throw everything at,” she told Sky News.
https://www.theage.com.au/politics/federal/albanese-doubles-down-on-trump-over-tariff-spike-now-he-s-urged-to-confront-him-face-to-face-20250601-p5m3wq.html
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73584
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23111511 (020927ZJUN25) Notable: US asked Australia to lift defence spending to 3.5 per cent of GDP - Australia has been asked to lift defence spending to 3.5 per cent of GDP “as soon as possible,” with the request being relayed directly from US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth to Deputy Prime Minister Richard Marles on the sidelines of the Shangri La Dialogue in Singapore. This is a major increase on the current levels of defence spending and would require the government to pour many tens of billions of extra money into the defence budget. It is also a significant step-up on the three per cent of GDP that US Under Secretary of Defence for Policy, Elbridge Colby, had signalled was needed in his nomination hearing in March. The American readout of the meeting between Mr Hegseth and Mr Marles, who is also the Australian Defence Minister, stated that the two men “discussed aligning investment to the security environment in the Indo-Pacific, accelerating US force posture initiatives in Australia, advancing defence industrial base co-operation, and creating supply chain resilience.” However, it also noted that, “on defence spending, Secretary Hegseth conveyed that Australia should increase its defence spending to 3.5 per cent of its GDP as soon as possible.” The US is pushing its allies and partners across the world to contribute more to their own defence rather than seeking to free ride on the American defence shield and nuclear umbrella. Mr Marles previously acknowledged that Mr Hegseth had urged Australia to increase defence spending following their meeting late last week. But he did not disclose the exact increase requested by his US counterpart.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73579
>>73580
>>73582
US asked Australia to lift defence spending to 3.5 per cent of GDP
JOE KELLY - 2 June 2025
1/2
Australia has been asked to lift defence spending to 3.5 per cent of GDP “as soon as possible,” with the request being relayed directly from US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth to Deputy Prime Minister Richard Marles on the sidelines of the Shangri La Dialogue in Singapore.
This is a major increase on the current levels of defence spending and would require the government to pour many tens of billions of extra money into the defence budget.
It is also a significant step-up on the three per cent of GDP that US Under Secretary of Defence for Policy, Elbridge Colby, had signalled was needed in his nomination hearing in March.
The American readout of the meeting between Mr Hegseth and Mr Marles, who is also the Australian Defence Minister, stated that the two men “discussed aligning investment to the security environment in the Indo-Pacific, accelerating US force posture initiatives in Australia, advancing defence industrial base co-operation, and creating supply chain resilience.”
However, it also noted that, “on defence spending, Secretary Hegseth conveyed that Australia should increase its defence spending to 3.5 per cent of its GDP as soon as possible.”
The US is pushing its allies and partners across the world to contribute more to their own defence rather than seeking to free ride on the American defence shield and nuclear umbrella.
Mr Marles previously acknowledged that Mr Hegseth had urged Australia to increase defence spending following their meeting late last week. But he did not disclose the exact increase requested by his US counterpart.
“On Friday, in our bilateral meeting, Secretary Hegseth did raise the question of increased defence expenditure on the Australian side,” Mr Marles said on Sunday. “Of course, we have already engaged in the last couple of years in the single biggest peace time increase in defence expenditure in Australia’s history. So we are beginning this journey.”
“We will continue to have the conversation with the United States, and we understand and we’re up for it.”
However, Mr Albanese provided a different message on Sunday. Asked about whether Australia would increase defence spending to 3 per cent - a figure less than the 3.5 per cent requested by Mr Hegseth - the Prime Minister said: “What we’ll do is we’ll determine our defence policy. And we’ve invested just across the forwards, an additional $10 billion in defence.”
“What we’ll do is continue to do is continue to provide for investing in our capability but also investing in our relationships in the region.”
Mr Albanese is expected to meet with Donald Trump on the sidelines of the G7 summit, hosted by Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney from June 15-17, where he may be asked directly to lift defence spending as a percentage of GDP to the new 3.5 per cent threshold nominated by Mr Hegseth.
Professor of International Security and Intelligence Studies at ANU, John Blaxland, told The Australian the demand presented a “bit of a challenge” for Mr Albanese to “actually navigate these very tricky shoals between the domestic imperative not to be seen to be too supportive of Trump’s initiatives because of the left of the Labor Party and the concerns there and, at the same time, to be sufficiently supportive of the US alliance and the US ambitions for Asia that it keeps the United States sufficiently satisfied.”
“It’s the goldilocks solution if you like - to look like you are not caving. But, in the White House, you look like you are a team player.”
Professor Blaxland suspected it would be untenable for the government to do nothing and would likely need make a consequential defence announcement at the time of Mr Albanese’s meeting with Mr Trump.
“They are going to have to look like they are going further than they would have,” he said.
He suggested the government might be considering putting another “half a billion on the table for AUKUS and perhaps (doing) more on critical minerals.”
“Perhaps additional business investment in the United States and perhaps some more money up front on Australian defence. That’s going to be challenging for him (Mr Albanese) to pull off.”
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73585
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23111526 (020935ZJUN25) Notable: Video: Albanese government must decide how to respond to Trump call on defence spending - "After being spectacularly called out by the Trump administration over its go-slow increase in defence spending, the Albanese government now faces a dilemma of its own making about how to respond. US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth has deliberately provoked Australia by publicly stating the Trump administration wants a dramatic increase in spending from 2 per cent of GDP to 3.5 per cent. Hegseth did not need to reveal this request publicly, but chose to do so in order to increase pressure on Australia to lift its contribution to regional and global security. Indeed Defence Minister Richard Marles tried to hide the specifics of their meeting in Singapore by failing to mention the 3.5 per cent figure to Australian media. Why was Marles so shy? Because it now puts the Albanese government in a very awkward spot - a spot for which it alone is responsible. If the government rushes to increase defence spending now, it risks being seen as a lackey of Trump and would make a lie of Albanese’s insistence that “we’ll determine our defence policy”. Yet to do nothing and completely ignore the requests of our closest ally - a country which is asking all of its allies to step up around the world – makes Australia appear like a laggard on collective global security at a time of grave strategic uncertainty. Such a vocal call-out by the Trump administration would not have been necessary if the government had done the right thing before the election and pledged a meaningful increase in defence spending." - Cameron Stewart - theaustralian.com.au
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73579
>>73582
>>73584
Albanese government must decide how to respond to Trump call on defence spending
CAMERON STEWART - 2 June 2025
After being spectacularly called out by the Trump administration over its go-slow increase in defence spending, the Albanese government now faces a dilemma of its own making about how to respond.
US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth has deliberately provoked Australia by publicly stating the Trump administration wants a dramatic increase in spending from 2 per cent of GDP to 3.5 per cent.
Hegseth did not need to reveal this request publicly, but chose to do so in order to increase pressure on Australia to lift its contribution to regional and global security.
Indeed Defence Minister Richard Marles tried to hide the specifics of their meeting in Singapore by failing to mention the 3.5 per cent figure to Australian media.
Why was Marles so shy? Because it now puts the Albanese government in a very awkward spot – a spot for which it alone is responsible.
If the government rushes to increase defence spending now, it risks being seen as a lackey of Trump and would make a lie of Albanese’s insistence that “we’ll determine our defence policy”.
Yet to do nothing and completely ignore the requests of our closest ally – a country which is asking all of its allies to step up around the world – makes Australia appear like a laggard on collective global security at a time of grave strategic uncertainty.
Such a vocal call-out by the Trump administration would not have been necessary if the government had done the right thing before the election and pledged a meaningful increase in defence spending.
The government knows that Australia faces the worst strategic circumstances in generations – because it says so itself – and it knew that Trump was berating his European allies for not spending more on defence.
So the right thing to do was to be proactive and announce a sizeable long-term commitment to higher defence spending before Trump called for it.
Labor strategists will say smugly that they won the election in a canter so they were right in their judgment that there was no public clamour to lift defence spending beyond current commitments.
But doing what’s right for national security isn’t always about what polls or focus groups think.
A grown-up government puts national interests ahead of its own budget handouts and short-term political strategy.
The best model for how Australia should respond now is British Prime Minister Keir Starmer, who this year responded to what he calls a “generational” challenge to security by pledging to lift Britain’s defence spending from 2.3 per cent of GDP to 2.5 per cent in just two years with a “clear ambition” to lift it to 3 per cent of GDP after the next election.
There is no reason why Australia cannot commit to lifting defence spending sharply from its current 2.02 per cent of GDP to 2.5 per cent by the end of the decade with an aspiration to raise it to 3 per cent in the 2030s.
This would be a meaningful increase and one which will be needed anyway to pay for the eye-watering costs of the AUKUS pact fleet of nuclear-powered submarines.
Almost every serious national security commentator in the country says 3 per cent is necessary to meet the challenge of a rising China and to pay for the future defence force which the government has promised.
Hegseth’s proposed level of 3.5 per cent of GDP is probably a stretch too far – it is unlikely to happen in peacetime Australia without a fundamental rethinking of the social compact of government. But there is no reason why the government cannot work towards the still-ambitious 3 per cent target.
The government boasts about how it is injecting $10bn in new money into defence over the next decade to lift defence spending from around 2 per cent to 2.3 per cent in 2033-34.
But this is sleepwalking compared to much of the rest of the Western world and is still below almost all of its like-minded European counterparts from Britain (2.3) to Poland (4.1), Greece (3.1), Denmark and Finland (2.4). Norway, Sweden, Turkey and France all spend more than Australia now does on defence as a proportion of GDP.
The Prime Minister appears frustrated by the pressure from the US and is so far downplaying its significance.
But the government knows it needs to step up its defence spending, not just because of Trump, but because of the growing shadow being cast by China.
This government almost certainly has six years left in power – now is the time to do the right thing, not just the easy thing, on defence and security.
https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/defence/albanese-government-must-decide-how-to-respond-to-trump-call-on-defence-spending/news-story/ae9dd0f4687930e1667de92268f6bfe0
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ybPlzVulyBs
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73586
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23111593 (021012ZJUN25) Notable: Taiwan tipping point as US-Australia forces prepare for war - Australia and the US have elevated military exercises and security agency co-operation to a war footing amid China’s unprecedented armed forces build-up in the Indo-Pacific and fears Xi Jinping could imminently move to invade Taiwan, triggering a major global conflict. The new flashpoint in US-China relations was sparked when US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth warned Beijing was preparing to potentially use military force to “alter the balance of power in the Indo-Pacific” and that Mr Xi had ordered his armed forces to be capable of invading Taiwan by 2027. Mr Hegseth’s speech, at the Shangri-La Dialogue in Singapore, which was immediately attacked by Chinese officials who cautioned the US to not “play with fire” on Taiwan, came amid an ongoing build up of American military personnel in Australia. The US has been strengthening its military presence in northern Australia and enhancing collaboration with Australian defence and security agencies as it prepares for the prospect of regional conflict with China. With close to 2500 marines rotating through the Northern Territory, the US military presence in Australia has hit its highest levels since the end of World War II. More than 30,000 military personnel from 19 nations will participate in the 11th Exercise Talisman Sabre, led by Australia and the US, from July 13 to August 4. The largest ever Talisman Sabre will be staged at sites in Australia and, for the first time, Papua New Guinea, consisting of live-fire and field training exercises, force preparation activities, amphibious landings, ground force manoeuvres, air combat and maritime operations.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73579
>>73582
>>73584
Taiwan tipping point as US-Australia forces prepare for war
GEOFF CHAMBERS - 1 June 2025
1/2
Australia and the US have elevated military exercises and security agency co-operation to a war footing amid China’s unprecedented armed forces build-up in the Indo-Pacific and fears Xi Jinping could imminently move to invade Taiwan, triggering a major global conflict.
Ahead of Anthony Albanese’s first in-person meeting with Donald Trump at the G7 summit in Canada, relations between Washington and Beijing sank to a new low on the weekend amid rising tensions between the superpowers over military expansion, Taiwan and trade tariffs.
The new flashpoint in US-China relations was sparked when US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth warned Beijing was preparing to potentially use military force to “alter the balance of power in the Indo-Pacific” and that Mr Xi had ordered his armed forces to be capable of invading Taiwan by 2027.
Mr Hegseth’s speech, at the Shangri-La Dialogue in Singapore, which was immediately attacked by Chinese officials who cautioned the US to not “play with fire” on Taiwan, came amid an ongoing build up of American military personnel in Australia.
The US has been strengthening its military presence in northern Australia and enhancing collaboration with Australian defence and security agencies as it prepares for the prospect of regional conflict with China. With close to 2500 marines rotating through the Northern Territory, the US military presence in Australia has hit its highest levels since the end of World War II.
Revealing Australia has locked in agreements with the US on ammunition, rockets and guided weapons, Mr Hegseth said the US Army would soon conduct “its first live-fire test of its mid-range capability system in Australia”.
“This will be the first time that system is fired west of the International Date Line, the first time it’s been tested on foreign soil. Deployments like this represent a commitment to the region, and there are many more planned,” Mr Hegseth said.
More than 30,000 military personnel from 19 nations will participate in the 11th Exercise Talisman Sabre, led by Australia and the US, from July 13 to August 4. The largest ever Talisman Sabre will be staged at sites in Australia and, for the first time, Papua New Guinea, consisting of live-fire and field training exercises, force preparation activities, amphibious landings, ground force manoeuvres, air combat and maritime operations.
In a new report titled The World According to Xi Jinping, Lowy Institute China expert Richard McGregor said “a confrontation with Washington could happen quickly or in slow motion”.
“So long as Xi remains in power and the United States maintains a significant military presence in Asia, ever intensifying competition is on the cards,” he wrote.
As relations between Mr Trump and Mr Xi sour, Mr Albanese will be forced to balance Australia’s security relationship with the US and economic ties with China when he meets the US President on the sidelines of the G7 summit, hosted by Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney from June 15-17.
The Prime Minister’s meeting with Mr Trump is expected to focus on geostrategic and security challenges posed by China, defence spending, critical minerals and tariffs.
Mr Albanese, who has forged closer ties with Mr Xi since winning the 2022 election and secured the removal of Chinese trade bans on local products, on Sunday said Australia’s position on Taiwan had not changed.
“Our position with regard to Taiwan is very clear, has been for a long period of time, which is a bipartisan position to support the status quo,” Mr Albanese said.
After Mr Hegseth last week directly urged Defence Minister Richard Marles to boost Australia’s defence budget, Mr Albanese said “we’ll determine our defence policy and we’ve invested across the forwards an additional $10bn in defence”.
Strategic Analysis Australia director Peter Jennings, a former Defence Department deputy secretary, said Mr Trump would likely “press Albanese to lift defence spending”.
“Defence spending is currently 2.05 per cent of gross domestic product, on a languid path to reach 2.4 per cent in eight years. No one outside of government (and in fact, not many inside government) believes that is an adequate response to our strategic situation,” Mr Jennings said.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73587
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23111605 (021025ZJUN25) Notable: Talisman Sabre -Magic Sword- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G02wKufX3nw - https://qalerts.pub/?q=Operation+Specialists - https://qalerts.pub/?q=magic - https://qresear.ch/?q=Talisman+Sabre
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73579
>>73584
>>73586
Talisman Sabre 2025: United Kingdom’s flagship carrier HMS Prince of Wales leads Strike Group heading to Darwin
Gary Shipway - June 1, 2025
A powerful British Carrier Strike Group is heading to Darwin.
The Strike Group is led by the United Kingdom’s flagship carrier HMS Prince of Wales and will be accompanied by the Royal Navy’s destroyer HMS Dauntless and frigate HMS Richmond. It will be the first time since in almost two decades that a British carrier will visit Australia.
Australian Minister for Defence Industry and Pacific Island Affairs Pat Conroy confirmed the Carrier Strike group’s Darwin visit and its participation in Exercise Talisman Sabre.
The Queen Elizabeth Class aircraft carrier is on an eight month overseas mission and is carrying up to two dozen Lockheed Martin F-35B Lightning II aircraft, including 809 Naval Air Squadron (NAS) “Immortals” and Royal Air Force (RAF) 617 Squadron “The Dambusters.” Nine Merlin anti-submarine warfare (ASW) helicopters from 820 NAS are also aboard, with three are designed for Airborne and Control (ASaC) operations.
The announcement also coincides with Defence Minister Richard Marles statements in Singapore at the weekend backing a call from US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth for America’s allies in the Asia-Pacific to do more to contribute to regional security, in part to counter China’s rapid military build-up.
In an address to the Shangri-La Dialogue in Singapore, Mr Hegseth said the threat posed by China to the region’s balance of power was real.
Defence Minister Richard Marles said Australia cannot rely on the United States alone to counter China’s military strength in the Indo-Pacific.
The UK Minister for Defence Procurement and Industry Maria Eagle at Fleet Base East who flew to Sydney in Sydney to review Australia–UK defence industry and capability collaboration and explore new opportunities said Britain is looking forward to Exercise Talisman Sabre.
“It’s just one more example of our defence co-operation,” Minister Eagle said.
“For the first time since 1997, a UK carrier, the HMS Prince of Wales will visit Australia docking in Darwin, and in the face of increasing global threats, the UK and Australia remain the greatest of friends, and among the closest of defence partners.”
Minister Conroy said Australia and the United Kingdom stand shoulder to shoulder against challenges to the rules-based global order.
“We’re very excited to see the carrier strike group in Australian waters.”
Exercise Talisman Sabre 2025 has 19 nations taking part.
It is a large-scale, multinational military exercise hosted by Australia.
It will be the eleventh iteration of the exercise and will focus on multi-domain war fighting, including land, air, sea, space, and cyber domains.
The exercise will involve more than 30,000 personnel and will take place from July 13 to August 4, 2025.
For the first time, Talisman Sabre 2025 will include activities in Papua New Guinea, in addition to areas across Australia.
https://www.ntnews.com.au/news/united-kingdoms-flagship-carrier-hms-prince-of-wales-leads-strike-group-heading-to-darwin/news-story/e5516025f1bd4a54d59dee848fefa2ee
https://www.defence.gov.au/news-events/releases/2025-04-23/exercise-talisman-sabre-2025
—
Talisman Sabre.
Magic Sword.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G02wKufX3nw
https://qalerts.pub/?q=Operation+Specialists
https://qalerts.pub/?q=magic
https://qresear.ch/?q=Talisman+Sabre
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73588
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23115808 (031004ZJUN25) Notable: Video: Greens aghast as Dorinda Cox jumps ship to Labor - Dorinda Cox’s shock defection from the Greens to Labor has blindsided her former colleagues and angered ex-staffers who had complained of bullying during their time in her office. Senator Cox appeared alongside Anthony Albanese at Perth’s Kings Park on Monday just over an hour after she called Greens leader Larissa Waters to inform her of her decision. The West Australian senator’s defection followed months of internal conflict within the Greens over Senator Cox, the failure of her bid to become deputy leader in the wake of last month’s dismal election showing, and the growing realisation that she was not going to be preselected in a winnable position on the party’s next Senate ticket. Several former staffers to Senator Cox came forward last year with claims that they had been bullied by the senator and had endured a toxic workplace environment marred by extremely high levels of staff turnover. While her parliamentary colleagues had been broadly supportive of the senator in the wake of last year’s bullying allegations, many of the rank-and-file Greens members in Western Australia are understood to have seen things very differently. She had also long ago lost the support of the party’s Indigenous faction, the Blak Greens, and many prominent members of the Indigenous community. Senator Cox had a fractious relationship with another Greens Senate defector, Lidia Thorpe, and had been concerned about reports - denied by Senator Thorpe – that her rival still had influence over the Greens.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73508
>>73509
Greens aghast as Dorinda Cox jumps ship to Labor
PAUL GARVEY and SARAH ISON - 3 June 2025
1/2
Dorinda Cox’s shock defection from the Greens to Labor has blindsided her former colleagues and angered ex-staffers who had complained of bullying during their time in her office.
Senator Cox appeared alongside Anthony Albanese at Perth’s Kings Park on Monday just over an hour after she called Greens leader Larissa Waters to inform her of her decision.
The West Australian senator’s defection followed months of internal conflict within the Greens over Senator Cox, the failure of her bid to become deputy leader in the wake of last month’s dismal election showing, and the growing realisation that she was not going to be preselected in a winnable position on the party’s next Senate ticket.
Several former staffers to Senator Cox came forward last year with claims that they had been bullied by the senator and had endured a toxic workplace environment marred by extremely high levels of staff turnover.
While her parliamentary colleagues had been broadly supportive of the senator in the wake of last year’s bullying allegations, many of the rank-and-file Greens members in Western Australia are understood to have seen things very differently.
She had also long ago lost the support of the party’s Indigenous faction, the Blak Greens, and many prominent members of the Indigenous community. Senator Cox had a fractious relationship with another Greens Senate defector, Lidia Thorpe, and had been concerned about reports – denied by Senator Thorpe – that her rival still had influence over the Greens.
Asked about the bullying allegations against Senator Cox, the Prime Minister said he was comfortable that those complaints had been adequately addressed.
“We examined everything that had been considered in the past. Those issues were dealt with appropriately,” he said.
“My government has established very clear guidelines, meaning that any issues relating to workplaces and making sure that workplaces are safe are properly examined. They were all dealt with in Senator Cox’s case and dealt with appropriately.”
The news of Senator Cox’s defection triggered anger among some of those former staffers who had previously complained about her behaviour.
One former staffer said that while it was not surprising to see Senator Cox part ways with the Greens, it was “shocking” to see her accepted into the Labor fold by Mr Albanese.
“It is disturbing that Labor and the Prime Minister would welcome into their party someone with such a history of alleged bullying,” one former staffer said.
The defection comes just weeks after Senator Cox missed out on the deputy leadership of the Greens, and just days after the Albanese government gave provisional approval to extend the life of Woodside Energy’s North West Shelf gas plant out to 2070.
Senator Cox had previously been vehemently opposed to the North West Shelf extension. She told The Australian in the lead-up to the election – when many pundits were pointing to a likely minority Labor government – that the Greens would “absolutely be taking Labor to task” on the North West Shelf if the Greens emerged with the balance of power in the lower house.
Asked about her position on the North West Shelf given her shift in allegiance, Senator Cox said it would not be appropriate for her to comment given the conditional approval given by Environment Minister Murray Watt last week was only provisional.
“My understanding is that Woodside do need to come back to Minister Watt. And obviously, I will be working with the Labor government now to ensure that we tread a pathway forward in ensuring that there’s a delivery of what’s required for the Australian public, particularly for the West Australian public, and to make sure that we are doing that in partnership with them,” she said.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73589
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23115822 (031016ZJUN25) Notable: ‘All dealt with’: Albanese defends Greens defector after bullying allegations - Prime Minister Anthony Albanese insists bullying complaints against West Australian senator Dorinda Cox were dealt with appropriately as he hailed her shock defection from the Greens to join his government. The move represents a body blow to the Greens, which lost three of its four lower house seats, including that of former leader Adam Bandt, at the election but had held its ground in the Senate. Cox said she only informed new Greens leader Larissa Waters of her decision 90 minutes before Albanese held an afternoon press conference with Cox in Perth on Monday before a cabinet meeting in the state on Tuesday. “I have reached a conclusion after deep and careful reflection that my values and priorities are more aligned with Labor than the Greens,” Cox said. “I’ve worked hard to make Australia fairer and much more reconciled. But recently, I’ve lost some confidence in the capacity for the Greens to assist me in being able to progress this.” Albanese said the problems had been addressed. “We examined everything that had been considered in the past. Those issues were dealt with appropriately. My government has established very clear guidelines,” Albanese said. “They were all dealt with in Senator Cox’s case and dealt with appropriately.”
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73588
‘All dealt with’: Albanese defends Greens defector after bullying allegations
Paul Sakkal and James Massola - June 3, 2025
1/2
Prime Minister Anthony Albanese insists bullying complaints against West Australian senator Dorinda Cox were dealt with appropriately as he hailed her shock defection from the Greens to join his government.
The move represents a body blow to the Greens, which lost three of its four lower house seats, including that of former leader Adam Bandt, at the election but had held its ground in the Senate.
Cox said she only informed new Greens leader Larissa Waters of her decision 90 minutes before Albanese held an afternoon press conference with Cox in Perth on Monday before a cabinet meeting in the state on Tuesday.
“I have reached a conclusion after deep and careful reflection that my values and priorities are more aligned with Labor than the Greens,” Cox said. “I’ve worked hard to make Australia fairer and much more reconciled. But recently, I’ve lost some confidence in the capacity for the Greens to assist me in being able to progress this.”
The senator, who has three years left on her term in parliament, was facing the prospect of losing the number one spot on the Greens’ Western Australian Senate ticket, after this masthead revealed Cox had lost 20 staff in three years.
Five lodged some form of complaint with the Parliamentary Workplace Support Service, while several lodged complaints with the leader’s office and with the WA branch of the Greens. In November, this masthead reported that parliament’s support service wound up its involvement without informing complainants of a resolution.
Cox has consistently denied the claims and argued they lacked context but apologised for any distress felt by her staff during a period when her office was dealing with the pandemic, then the Voice referendum, multiple parliamentary inquiries and a large geographic area.
Cox said at the time that she took responsibility “for any shortcomings in what has occurred during this period”.
Albanese said the problems had been addressed. “We examined everything that had been considered in the past. Those issues were dealt with appropriately. My government has established very clear guidelines,” Albanese said. “They were all dealt with in Senator Cox’s case and dealt with appropriately.”
Albanese appeared chuffed with the rare defection and said Cox approached Labor and had not asked for anything in return.
“[What] struck me as we were sitting down having a discussion about this, that the reason why Dorinda has made this decision is the same reason why all those years ago, as a very young man, I made a decision to join the Labor Party,” he said.
“You want to make a difference, that the way that you make a difference is by being a member of a party of government, that the values that Dorinda has are perfectly consistent with the values of the Labor Party.”
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73590
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23115832 (031022ZJUN25) Notable: Bullying complaints against Labor’s Dorinda Cox ‘not over’ - Indigenous and Jewish leaders have questioned Dorinda Cox’s decision to defect from the Greens to Labor, with one of the senator’s former staffers warning that bullying allegations against the senator are not settled. Senator Cox made the shock announcement of her move to Labor on Monday, just weeks after she missed out on the deputy leadership of the Greens. She said her switch - which also came days after Environment Minister Murray Watt approved the North West Shelf gas extension she had opposed – showed that her “values and priorities are more aligned with Labor”. The West Australian senator looked increasingly unlikely to secure a winnable spot on the Greens’ next Senate ticket amid tensions between her and party members. Senator Cox last year apologised after multiple staff came forward with allegations that they had been bullied during their time in her office, and many grassroots Greens members and the Blak Greens faction are angry about what they see as a lack of action from the top of the party in response to those complaints. Anthony Albanese on Monday said the allegations had been “dealt with” through the appropriate channels. One of the complainants against the senator, Esther Montgomery, told The Australian on Tuesday that she had “no doubt” that her decision to join Labor would ultimately end in tears for the Albanese government. “Dorinda Cox is a creature of habit. She’s a bully by nature, and it’s going to be very, very interesting, the dynamics within the party,” she said. Ms Montgomery, an Indigenous elder and veteran activist, spent a “nightmare” two months employed in Senator Cox’s office and went public with her complaints last year.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73588
>>73589
Bullying complaints against Labor’s Dorinda Cox ‘not over’
PAUL GARVEY and SARAH ISON - 3 June 2025
1/2
Indigenous and Jewish leaders have questioned Dorinda Cox’s decision to defect from the Greens to Labor, with one of the senator’s former staffers warning that bullying allegations against the senator are not settled.
Senator Cox made the shock announcement of her move to Labor on Monday, just weeks after she missed out on the deputy leadership of the Greens. She said her switch – which also came days after Environment Minister Murray Watt approved the North West Shelf gas extension she had opposed – showed that her “values and priorities are more aligned with Labor”.
The West Australian senator looked increasingly unlikely to secure a winnable spot on the Greens’ next Senate ticket amid tensions between her and party members. Senator Cox last year apologised after multiple staff came forward with allegations that they had been bullied during their time in her office, and many grassroots Greens members and the Blak Greens faction are angry about what they see as a lack of action from the top of the party in response to those complaints.
Anthony Albanese on Monday said the allegations had been “dealt with” through the appropriate channels.
One of the complainants against the senator, Esther Montgomery, told The Australian on Tuesday that she had “no doubt” that her decision to join Labor would ultimately end in tears for the Albanese government.
“Dorinda Cox is a creature of habit. She’s a bully by nature, and it’s going to be very, very interesting, the dynamics within the party,” she said.
Ms Montgomery, an Indigenous elder and veteran activist, spent a “nightmare” two months employed in Senator Cox’s office and went public with her complaints last year. She said no one from the government had made contact with her or other former staffers who had spoken out.
While the Parliamentary Workplace Support Service – the independent body set up to address workplace issues in the federal parliament – has investigated the complaints against the senator, Ms Montgomery said she and the other former staffers had not given up on having the bullying allegations further examined.
“We certainly are still holding her and her behaviour, in terms of occupational health and safety, to account,” she said. “She’s not getting away with the bullying, gaslighting and harassment and the personal trauma that she caused many of the staffers. She’s not getting away with it.”
Ms Montgomery said the senator had a poor relationship with many people in WA’s Indigenous communities, who felt she had not done enough to help them.
“People refuse to work with her, the Blak Greens refuse to work with her, Aboriginal members of the Australian Greens refuse to work with her. She doesn’t go into these remote communities. We have a lot of stuff going on in communities, homelessness, cost of living, obviously, the North West Shelf venture extension being announced, and Dorinda’s done absolutely nothing.”
Another prominent Indigenous figure, Save Our Songlines founder Raelene Cooper, said the senator’s s defection supported her long-held belief that Senator Cox was not “genuine” in her efforts to help grassroots campaigners in WA. “Good riddance to bad rubbish,” she said.
Ms Cooper has been aggressively campaigning against Woodside Energy’s North West Shelf, and Senator Cox had as recently as last week been adamant that the government should not approve the 40-year extension of the plant. Ms Cooper said she believed Senator Cox had realised that her best hope of political survival rested with Labor after the Greens “rejected” her.
“It is what it is, but … I feel really let down as an Aboriginal person in this country,” she said.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73591
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23115853 (031034ZJUN25) Notable: Video: AUKUS partnership: UK unveils radical defence overhaul as Starmer eyes Russian threat - Britain says it will radically change its approach to defence to address threats from Russia, nuclear risks and cyber attacks by investing in drones and digital warfare rather than relying on a much larger army to engage in modern combat. Responding to US President Donald Trump's insistence that Europe must take more responsibility for its security, Prime Minister Keir Starmer has pledged the largest sustained increase to UK defence spending since the end of the Cold War. The UK government's strategic defence review, published on Monday, local time, included plans to increase the size of its nuclear-powered attack submarine fleet. The new submarines will be a model jointly developed by the UK, US and Australia under the security partnership AUKUS. "We know that threats are increasing and we must act decisively to face down Russian aggression," UK Defence Secretary John Healey said in a statement. Britain will build up to 12 of its next-generation attack submarines - which are nuclear-powered but carry conventional non-nuclear weapons — to replace the current fleet of seven by the late 2030s, the Ministry of Defence said in a statement. But with limited finances, the government's overall plan to boost the UK's defence capability envisages making the army more lethal, not larger, by learning from Ukraine where drones and technology have transformed the battlefield. The government has promised to raise defence spending to 2.5 per cent of GDP by 2027, and target a 3 per cent level over the longer term.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73432
AUKUS partnership: UK unveils radical defence overhaul as Starmer eyes Russian threat
Reuters / abc.net.au - 3 June 2025
1/2
Britain says it will radically change its approach to defence to address threats from Russia, nuclear risks and cyber attacks by investing in drones and digital warfare rather than relying on a much larger army to engage in modern combat.
Responding to US President Donald Trump's insistence that Europe must take more responsibility for its security, Prime Minister Keir Starmer has pledged the largest sustained increase to UK defence spending since the end of the Cold War.
The UK government's strategic defence review, published on Monday, local time, included plans to increase the size of its nuclear-powered attack submarine fleet.
The new submarines will be a model jointly developed by the UK, US and Australia under the security partnership AUKUS.
"We know that threats are increasing and we must act decisively to face down Russian aggression," UK Defence Secretary John Healey said in a statement.
Britain will build up to 12 of its next-generation attack submarines — which are nuclear-powered but carry conventional non-nuclear weapons — to replace the current fleet of seven by the late 2030s, the Ministry of Defence said in a statement.
But with limited finances, the government's overall plan to boost the UK's defence capability envisages making the army more lethal, not larger, by learning from Ukraine where drones and technology have transformed the battlefield.
The government has promised to raise defence spending to 2.5 per cent of GDP by 2027, and target a 3 per cent level over the longer term.
Mr Healey said Britain's adversaries were working in greater alliance, and technology was changing how wars were fought.
"Drones now kill more people than traditional artillery in the war in Ukraine and whoever gets new technology into the hands of their armed forces the quickest will win," he said.
Sir Keir commissioned a strategic defence review shortly after he was elected last July, tasking experts including the former NATO boss, George Robertson, and a former Russia adviser to the White House, Fiona Hill, with formulating a plan for the next 10 years.
Despite cuts to the military budget in recent years, Britain still ranks alongside France as one of Europe's leading military powers, with its army helping to protect NATO's eastern flank and its navy maintaining a presence in the Indo-Pacific.
But its army, with 70,860 full-time trained soldiers, is its smallest since the Napoleonic era, and the government says it needs to be reformed given the growing strategic threats.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73592
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23115924 (031105ZJUN25) Notable: TikTok fires shot in social media war, putting heat on the federal government’s crackdown - The Albanese government will come under enormous pressure to deliver on its pre-election pledges relating to social media age restrictions and the news media bargaining code, as tech companies prepare well-funded public campaigns to lobby for amendments to the laws. Video-sharing app TikTok fired its first post-election shot at the federal government last week, paying tens of thousands of dollars for four-and-a-half pages of advertising in the Nine-owned Australian Financial Review extolling the supposed educational and social benefits for children who use the social media platform. In December, the government passed legislation to ban children under 16 from accessing certain social media platforms, including TikTok, Snapchat, Instagram and Facebook, but granted an exemption for YouTube because of its perceived educational value. That decision has angered YouTube’s commercial rivals, which are preparing extensive ad campaigns in the weeks and months ahead seeking to undermine the federal government’s social media legislation, due to come into effect in December. The intense lobbying in Australia by the social media platforms, and companies Meta and Google with regards to the media bargaining code, is complicated by the political landscape in the US, where tech companies are seeking to closely align themselves with the Trump administration, which is broadly sympathetic to their cause.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
TikTok fires shot in social media war, putting heat on the federal government’s crackdown
JAMES MADDEN - June 02, 2025
The Albanese government will come under enormous pressure to deliver on its pre-election pledges relating to social media age restrictions and the news media bargaining code, as tech companies prepare well-funded public campaigns to lobby for amendments to the laws.
Video-sharing app TikTok fired its first post-election shot at the federal government last week, paying tens of thousands of dollars for four-and-a-half pages of advertising in the Nine-owned Australian Financial Review extolling the supposed educational and social benefits for children who use the social media platform.
In December, the government passed legislation to ban children under 16 from accessing certain social media platforms, including TikTok, Snapchat, Instagram and Facebook, but granted an exemption for YouTube because of its perceived educational value.
That decision has angered YouTube’s commercial rivals, which are preparing extensive ad campaigns in the weeks and months ahead seeking to undermine the federal government’s social media legislation, due to come into effect in December.
In a statement to The Australian on Friday, a TikTok spokesman said: “As a platform, the safety of our community, particularly our younger users, is the highest priority and our in-built safety features recognise that people develop at different stages.
“Regarding the under-16 ban, the law is intended to keep young people safe and special exemptions, not based on evidence, undermine its intent. We will continue to work with the Australian government to keep teens safe and reduce the unintended consequences of this law.”
The intense lobbying in Australia by the social media platforms, and companies Meta and Google with regards to the media bargaining code, is complicated by the political landscape in the US, where tech companies are seeking to closely align themselves with the Trump administration, which is broadly sympathetic to their cause.
US President Donald Trump opposes the push to make tech companies compensate news media outlets for the use of their content, identifying the law earlier this year as a likely trade grievance, and he has also shown little interest in addressing the social harms caused to children by social media platforms.
During the election campaign, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said his government was committed to the news media bargaining code.
“Our government stands by our media bargaining code. And we have no intention of repealing the world-leading legislation that we passed with overwhelming support that set the minimum age for social media at 16,” he said on April 3.
“That policy is about what’s best for Australian children and Australian parents. These are our priorities.”
On the weekend, a spokesman for the Albanese government reiterated Labor’s commitment to its pledge to rein in the powers of social media platforms and tech companies.
“The Albanese government is progressing the electoral mandate to implement the social media minimum age and news bargaining reforms as key priorities,” the spokesman said.
https://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/media/tiktok-fires-shot-in-social-media-war-putting-heat-on-the-federal-governments-crackdown/news-story/24b5ed78938da9fab882b7647d990bde
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73593
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23115940 (031112ZJUN25) Notable: US Space Forces Indo-Pacific commander highlights growing role of space in regional security at Australian Space Summit - U.S. Space Force Brig. Gen. Anthony Mastalir, USSF Indo-Pacific commander, emphasized the critical role of space capabilities in ensuring stability across the Indo-Pacific region at Australian Space Summit 2025, May 27-28. Speaking to a diverse audience of defense leaders, industry partners, and policymakers, Mastalir underscored the evolving mission of the U.S. Space Force and the depth of the U.S.-Australia military alliance during a keynote address and panel discussion. “In light of today’s challenges and the imperative for a robust, integrative response … we established U.S. Space Forces Indo-Pacific in 2022,” Mastalir said. “Our mission remains unchanged: integrated space operations to preserve a free and open Indo-Pacific.” Mastalir highlighted the recent establishment of Space Force components in South Korea and Japan, underscoring a growing forward presence designed to deter threats and enhance operational integration with allies. “Guardians in these components work side by side with our allies to integrate space capabilities into military operations and protect friendly forces from space-enabled attacks,” he explained. He also reaffirmed the indispensable role of Australia in U.S. defense strategy, “Australia is not just a strategic partner, but a true friend, and an essential pillar of deterrence here,” Mastalir said. “Our nations have forged a bond that is both enduring and meaningful.”
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73579
>>73586
>>73587
US Space Forces Indo-Pacific commander highlights growing role of space in regional security at Australian Space Summit
Capt. Gerald Peden - June 2, 2025
Sydney, Australia (AFNS) - U.S. Space Force Brig. Gen. Anthony Mastalir, USSF Indo-Pacific commander, emphasized the critical role of space capabilities in ensuring stability across the Indo-Pacific region at Australian Space Summit 2025, May 27-28.
Speaking to a diverse audience of defense leaders, industry partners, and policymakers, Mastalir underscored the evolving mission of the U.S. Space Force and the depth of the U.S.-Australia military alliance during a keynote address and panel discussion.
“In light of today’s challenges and the imperative for a robust, integrative response … we established U.S. Space Forces Indo-Pacific in 2022,” Mastalir said. “Our mission remains unchanged: integrated space operations to preserve a free and open Indo-Pacific.”
Mastalir highlighted the recent establishment of Space Force components in South Korea and Japan, underscoring a growing forward presence designed to deter threats and enhance operational integration with allies.
“Guardians in these components work side by side with our allies to integrate space capabilities into military operations and protect friendly forces from space-enabled attacks,” he explained.
He also reaffirmed the indispensable role of Australia in U.S. defense strategy, “Australia is not just a strategic partner, but a true friend, and an essential pillar of deterrence here,” Mastalir said. “Our nations have forged a bond that is both enduring and meaningful.”
Australian Defense Force Lt. Gen. Susan Coyle, ADF Joint Capabilities chief, underscored the critical importance of U.S.-Australian military cooperation in the rapidly evolving space domain while participating in a joint panel discussion with Mastalir.
"We have fought together since World War One,” Coyle said. “You don't build friends in a crisis. You build friends now, and we have a deep shared history of that.
Both generals discussed a shared strategic vision for the Indo-Pacific, focusing on deterrence and responsible space operations. Mastalir stressed that their approach is about "peace through strength," with both nations committed to preventing conflict by demonstrating robust defensive capabilities.
Coyle emphasized the importance of collaborative efforts, stating that Australia is "interested in how we can be a better, more lethal and more survivable defense force that contributes to peace and security in our region."
The discussion revealed a unified approach to space domain challenges, with both leaders highlighting the need to protect space assets critical to joint military operations. They also emphasized the importance of space domain awareness, satellite protection and developing technologies to counter emerging threats.
“Every challenge we face is also an opportunity—an opportunity to innovate, to grow stronger, and to set a shining example for the world,” Mastalir said.
With mounting challenges in the space domain, U.S. Space Forces Indo-Pacific is positioning itself as a keystone of deterrence, innovation and allied cooperation in the region.
As Mastalir affirmed, “This isn’t just about building stronger satellites or more agile fighting capabilities. It’s about building a legacy — one that fortifies our shared values and affirms our belief in a better, brighter future.”
https://www.spaceforce.mil/News/Article-Display/Article/4203106/us-space-forces-indo-pacific-commander-highlights-growing-role-of-space-in-regi/
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73594
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23120646 (040912ZJUN25) Notable: Video: Tasmanian Labor leader Dean Winter tables no-confidence motion in Premier Jeremy Rockliff - Tasmanian Premier Jeremy Rockliff has warned the state will head to the polls early if Labor's no confidence motion in him is successful. Mr Rockliff's leadership hangs by a thread, with the Greens' decision about whether to support a no-confidence motion set to determine whether or not he stays in the top job. Labor leader Dean Winter declared during his budget reply speech on Tuesday that he had no confidence in Mr Rockliff. Mr Winter's position has already won the backing of three crossbenchers - independents Kristie Johnston and Craig Garland, and Jacqui Lambie Network MP Andrew Jenner. "Today, I've tabled a motion that says the house has no confidence in this premier, because he's wrecked the budget, because he's planning to sell our power companies, our ports and our public transport, and because no one can trust him after the handling of the Spirit of Tasmania fiasco," Mr Winter said. The opposition has repeatedly described last Thursday's budget, which forecast four deficits and debt reaching $10.8 billion in the 2028-29 financial year, as the worst budget in the state's history. Mr Winter threw the gauntlet down to the crossbench to support the motion. "If they really are opposed to the premier's agenda of debt, deficit and debacle as they claim, then tell the house you've lost confidence in this premier," he said. "When enough members indicate their support for my motion, I will move it. If not, they will show they're happy to go along with this agenda, all of the debt, all of the cuts, all of the privatisation." The motion needs the support of eight crossbenchers to succeed. It currently has three, but will have the required eight if the Greens vote to support it at a partyroom meeting on Wednesday.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Tasmanian Labor leader Dean Winter tables no-confidence motion in Premier Jeremy Rockliff
Adam Langenberg - 4 June 2025
1/2
Tasmanian Premier Jeremy Rockliff has warned the state will head to the polls early if Labor's no confidence motion in him is successful
Mr Rockliff's leadership hangs by a thread, with the Greens' decision about whether to support a no-confidence motion set to determine whether or not he stays in the top job.
In a late night Facebook post on Tuesday, Mr Rockliff accused the Labor Party of being "hell bent on forcing Tasmania to an early election".
"An election just over 12 months since the last one," he said.
"That's the last thing Tasmanian needs.
"That's the last thing Tasmanians want."
Labor leader Dean Winter declared during his budget reply speech on Tuesday that he had no confidence in Mr Rockliff.
Mr Winter's position has already won the backing of three crossbenchers — independents Kristie Johnston and Craig Garland, and Jacqui Lambie Network MP Andrew Jenner.
"Today, I've tabled a motion that says the house has no confidence in this premier, because he's wrecked the budget, because he's planning to sell our power companies, our ports and our public transport, and because no one can trust him after the handling of the Spirit of Tasmania fiasco," Mr Winter said.
The opposition has repeatedly described last Thursday's budget, which forecast four deficits and debt reaching $10.8 billion in the 2028-29 financial year, as the worst budget in the state's history.
Mr Winter threw the gauntlet down to the crossbench to support the motion.
"If they really are opposed to the premier's agenda of debt, deficit and debacle as they claim, then tell the house you've lost confidence in this premier," he said.
"When enough members indicate their support for my motion, I will move it. If not, they will show they're happy to go along with this agenda, all of the debt, all of the cuts, all of the privatisation.
"And they'll show Tasmanians that a vote for anyone except Labor is a vote for the Liberals, and they can rest assured that we will let Tasmanians know exactly who is propping up this failed, incompetent, reckless Liberal government."
The motion needs the support of eight crossbenchers to succeed.
It currently has three, but will have the required eight if the Greens vote to support it at a partyroom meeting on Wednesday.
Greens to discuss 'in depth'
Greens MP Vica Bayley said the party would discuss it "in depth".
"We'll certainly take the time to have a look at it," Mr Bayley said.
If they do support it, Mr Winter could bring on the motion for debate as soon as Wednesday morning.
Other crossbenchers needed less time before deciding to support the motion, with Ms Johnston saying she was in favour even if it meant an early election.
"I will not be intimidated by the premier with the threat of an election," Ms Johnston said.
"He likes to threaten members of [parliament] with things like withdrawing an AFL team or an election … it's his job to be accountable, transparent and to act with integrity for the people of Tasmania, so he can't continue to threaten them."
She said the crossbench existed to hold the government to account.
"His budget is grossly mismanaged, his major project delivery is failing each and every time, it is not good enough."
Mr Jenner said he no longer had faith in Mr Rockliff's leadership.
"He runs that government, he's part of the government and if the budget isn't doing the job for the Tasmanian people then obviously the responsibility is his," he said.
"I truly think it's the right thing to do for Tasmanians, to hold the government to account for its spending."
Mr Garland said he gave the government a warning last year that he would not support this year's budget unless "they looked at attending to the dire straits we're in" and no longer had faith in the government.
"They've refused to look at areas to drag in extra revenue. Take the salmon industry for instance, if they would introduce a resource tax for the use of our waterways, we'd be millions and millions of dollars better off, but they're not prepared to do that," he said.
"How far do you go before you rein in an out-of-control, arrogant, ignorant government?"
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73595
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23120665 (040920ZJUN25) Notable: Chaos, election looms as Premier rolled by parliament - Tasmania is in political limbo, with a lame-duck premier attempting to force an early election rather than resign - and no-one sure who will be leading the state by the weekend. The island state’s beleaguered Liberal Premier, Jeremy Rockliff, is expected to visit acting governor Christopher Shanahan on or before Thursday morning to call an early election, rather than resign due to an ongoing no-confidence motion he appears certain to lose. Despite losing the confidence of a majority of MPs for his minority government, Jeremy Rockliff on Wednesday vowed to “fight to my last breath”. For now, it appears his shaken Liberals colleagues are standing by him, resisting the urge to cut him loose or accept any invitation by Chief Justice Shanahan to change leaders. That means Labor leader Dean Winter may be called on to try to form a government - an invitation, with just 10 seats out of 35, sources suggest he is unlikely to accept. Barring any change by the key players, such a standoff would force Tasmanians to the polls for a second time within 15 months, with a state budget frozen in parliament, threatening payment of public service wages. Labor leader Dean Winter has secured the support of the Greens and three independents to oust Mr Rockliff, with grievances cited including alleged budget mismanagement, bungled ferry infrastructure projects, a privatisation agenda and the AFL stadium. Mr Winter told the House of Assembly Mr Rockliff was taking state net debt from $1 billion when he became Premier in April 2022 to almost $11 billion by 2028-29. “Jeremy Rockliff is sending Tasmania broke and his only plan to fix it is to sell Tasmanian assets that Tasmanians built together over the past 100 years,” Mr Winter said.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73594
Chaos, election looms as Premier rolled by parliament
MATTHEW DENHOLM - 4 June 2025
1/2
Tasmania is in political limbo, with a lame-duck premier attempting to force an early election rather than resign - and no-one sure who will be leading the state by the weekend.
The island state’s beleaguered Liberal Premier, Jeremy Rockliff, is expected to visit acting governor Christopher Shanahan on or before Thursday morning to call an early election, rather than resign due to an ongoing no-confidence motion he appears certain to lose.
Despite losing the confidence of a majority of MPs for his minority government, Jeremy Rockliff on Wednesday vowed to “fight to my last breath”.
For now, it appears his shaken Liberals colleagues are standing by him, resisting the urge to cut him loose or accept any invitation by Chief Justice Shanahan to change leaders.
That means Labor leader Dean Winter may be called on to try to form a government - an invitation, with just 10 seats out of 35, sources suggest he is unlikely to accept.
Barring any change by the key players, such a standoff would force Tasmanians to the polls for a second time within 15 months, with a state budget frozen in parliament, threatening payment of public service wages.
Labor leader Dean Winter has secured the support of the Greens and three independents to oust Mr Rockliff, with grievances cited including alleged budget mismanagement, bungled ferry infrastructure projects, a privatisation agenda and the AFL stadium.
Mr Winter told the House of Assembly Mr Rockliff was taking state net debt from $1 billion when he became Premier in April 2022 to almost $11 billion by 2028-29.
“Jeremy Rockliff is sending Tasmania broke and his only plan to fix it is to sell Tasmanian assets that Tasmanians built together over the past 100 years,” Mr Winter said.
The Australian understands the Liberals encouraged key business figures to try to persuade Mr Winter to back-down on the motion, while also trying unsuccessfully to persuade two of the three independents to change their stance.
Mr Rockliff, whose Liberals secured just 14 of 35 seats at the March 2024 election, traded barbs with Mr Winter about who would be to blame for an early election.
“An election just over 12 months since the last one - that’s the last thing Tasmania needs,” Mr Rockliff said. “That’s the last thing Tasmanians want. Investment and business confidence would go off a cliff.
“Because the budget hasn’t been passed, nurses, doctors, firefighters and police would risk not being paid.”
Mr Rockliff told the Assembly Mr Winter was “reckless and weak” and placing a lust for power above Tasmania’s interests. “This day may not end well for me but this day will define you,” he said.
However, Mr Winter said Labor would continue to offer supply to a new Liberal premier and had been forced into the no confidence motion by budget mismanagement. “We need to change the trajectory of our public finances,” Mr Winter said.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73596
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23120675 (040924ZJUN25) Notable: Australia spared Trump tariff letter as Ley says Albanese should secure special deal - Australia has been spared a letter from the Trump administration demanding countries cut trade barriers to US goods as the White House prepares to reinstate its “liberation day” tariffs, but has not secured a UK-style exemption to increased steel and aluminium import taxes. Trade Minister Don Farrell met his US counterpart Jamieson Greer in Paris overnight as Albanese prepares to hold his first meeting with Trump later this month, either in the US or on the sidelines of the G7 meeting of the world’s largest economies in Canada. The meeting is expected to be dominated by Trump’s trade war and US requests for its allies to boost defence spending. Albanese this week pushed back against a request from US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth for Australia to boost its military spending from about 2 per cent of GDP to 3.5 per cent. The United States Trade Representative, the office primarily responsible for trade matters, sent a letter to countries asking them to provide their best offer for a trade deal by Wednesday, US time. The Trump administration confirmed the missive, first reported by Reuters. The letter suggests fresh urgency from the Trump administration as it looks to settle trade deals with partners before July 8, when the 90-day “pause” on Trump’s so-called reciprocal tariffs expires. An Australian government spokeswoman said Australia did not receive the letter because it was only sent to nations with a higher tariff rate than the baseline 10 per cent rate. “Australia is in the lowest ‘baseline’ tariff tier of 10 per cent,” she said. “As such, the US administration has confirmed Australia has not been sent a letter. Trade Minister Farrell met with his US counterpart today in Paris and pressed for the removal of unjustified tariffs imposed on Australian goods.”
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73550
>>73578
>>73583
Australia spared Trump tariff letter as Ley says Albanese should secure special deal
Paul Sakkal - June 4, 2025
Australia has been spared a letter from the Trump administration demanding countries cut trade barriers to US goods as the White House prepares to reinstate its “liberation day” tariffs, but has not secured a UK-style exemption to increased steel and aluminium import taxes.
Opposition Leader Sussan Ley pushed Prime Minister Anthony Albanese to get the same reduced tariffs for Australian metal exports to the US that British Prime Minister Keir Starmer won for the UK, saying the opposition would work with the government to make it happen.
“President [Donald] Trump’s tariffs on our steelmakers are not in the spirit of our century-old partnership, and we urge the Americans to give Australia a fair go and remove them,” Ley said.
Trade Minister Don Farrell met his US counterpart Jamieson Greer in Paris overnight as Albanese prepares to hold his first meeting with Trump later this month, either in the US or on the sidelines of the G7 meeting of the world’s largest economies in Canada.
The meeting is expected to be dominated by Trump’s trade war and US requests for its allies to boost defence spending. Albanese this week pushed back against a request from US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth for Australia to boost its military spending from about 2 per cent of GDP to 3.5 per cent.
The United States Trade Representative, the office primarily responsible for trade matters, sent a letter to countries asking them to provide their best offer for a trade deal by Wednesday, US time. The Trump administration confirmed the missive, first reported by Reuters.
The letter suggests fresh urgency from the Trump administration as it looks to settle trade deals with partners before July 8, when the 90-day “pause” on Trump’s so-called reciprocal tariffs expires.
An Australian government spokeswoman said Australia did not receive the letter because it was only sent to nations with a higher tariff rate than the baseline 10 per cent rate.
“Australia is in the lowest ‘baseline’ tariff tier of 10 per cent,” she said. “As such, the US administration has confirmed Australia has not been sent a letter.
“Trade Minister Farrell met with his US counterpart today in Paris and pressed for the removal of unjustified tariffs imposed on Australian goods.”
The US president signed an executive order raising metals tariffs from 25 to 50 per cent overnight.
The only nation singled out was Britain, which will continue to be levied a 25 per cent tariff after Starmer struck a deal with Trump following a free trade pact agreed in principle between the countries.
Metals tariffs on imports from Britain will remain at the previous 25 per cent as the nations continue to negotiate up to a July 9 cut-off. In early April, Trump declared “liberation day” for America by instituting double-digit tariffs on countries around the world, but suspended them after markets dropped precipitously.
Ley told this masthead: “We note that the United Kingdom has been able to secure an exemption from the latest American steel tariffs and we stand ready to work with the Albanese government to ensure Australia can achieve the same outcome.
“The Coalition wants the government to succeed here because that is in our national interest.”
Ley’s comments are more conciliatory than those of her predecessor Peter Dutton, who claimed repeatedly during the recent federal election campaign that he could secure a better tariff deal than Labor if he were elected. The Turnbull government secured an exemption on metals tariffs in Trump’s first term, as did other allies, but the US administration has been far less inclined to give exemptions this time.
In a statement, Trump said he had decided to “provide different treatment” to the UK after a deal that was struck between Washington and London in May.
The 50 per cent tariff rate more widely is due to come into force from 12.01am Washington, DC, time on Wednesday.
Marghanita Johnson, chief executive of the Australian Aluminium Council, said this week the industry was working to understand the impact the recently revised aluminium specific tariff will have on Australia’s aluminium trade.
“A key concern is the potential for the distortion of international trade flows, which disrupt efficient market operations and increase the risk of trade diversion,” Johnson said.
The UK is a relatively minor player in aluminium exports, trading about 22,000 tonnes of aluminium into the US a year, well below Australia’s export of 82,000 tonnes last year which made it the eighth largest source of aluminium imports to the US.
https://www.smh.com.au/politics/federal/australia-spared-trump-tariff-letter-as-ley-says-albanese-should-secure-special-deal-20250604-p5m4sl.html
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73597
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23120694 (040934ZJUN25) Notable: Beijing denounces Marles over ‘China threat’ as Farrell is welcomed to Shanghai - Beijing has denounced Defence Minister Richard Marles for spreading the “China threat” while inviting Trade Minister Don Farrell to visit Shanghai in November, as Canberra comes under pressure from Washington to ramp up its defence budget and reduce its economic ties with China. Late on Tuesday, China’s Foreign Ministry condemned the US, Japan, Australia and the Philippines after the four American allies met on the sidelines of a security conference in Singapore and discussed shared concerns about Beijing’s use of force and coercion in the East China Sea and the South China Sea. “The US, together with Japan, Australia, and the Philippines, brazenly spread the false accusation of (the) ‘China threat’ at the Shangri-La Dialogue and sought to use the East China Sea issue and the South China Sea issue to sow discord and incite confrontation between regional countries. China strongly deplores and firmly opposes it, and has made serious protests,” Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Lin Jian told a press conference in Beijing. Hours later, in Paris, Senator Farrell was feted by his Chinese counterpart, Commerce Minister Wang Wentao, who urged Canberra to “jointly safeguard the multilateral trading system” with Beijing. Senator Farrell accepted an invitation from the Chinese Commerce Minister to attend the China International Import Expo in Shanghai in November, according to a Chinese government readout of the meeting, which was held on the sidelines of the OECD. It will be the third consecutive year the Australian Trade Minister has attended the trade show, the most politically important in China.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73566
>>73579
Beijing denounces Marles over ‘China threat’ as Farrell is welcomed to Shanghai
Beijing condemned Richard Marles for stoking anti-China sentiment while inviting Don Farrell to Shanghai, as the US pressures Australia to reduce economic ties with its largest trading partner.
WILL GLASGOW - 4 June 2025
Beijing has denounced Defence Minister Richard Marles for spreading the “China threat” while inviting Trade Minister Don Farrell to visit Shanghai in November, as Canberra comes under pressure from Washington to ramp up its defence budget and reduce its economic ties with China.
Late on Tuesday, China’s Foreign Ministry condemned the US, Japan, Australia and the Philippines after the four American allies met on the sidelines of a security conference in Singapore and discussed shared concerns about Beijing’s use of force and coercion in the East China Sea and the South China Sea.
“The US, together with Japan, Australia, and the Philippines, brazenly spread the false accusation of (the) ‘China threat’ at the Shangri-La Dialogue and sought to use the East China Sea issue and the South China Sea issue to sow discord and incite confrontation between regional countries. China strongly deplores and firmly opposes it, and has made serious protests,” Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Lin Jian told a press conference in Beijing.
“Bloc politics and confrontation will not solve any problem, still less intimidate China. We will not flinch in defending China’s territorial sovereignty and maritime rights and interests.”
Hours later, in Paris, Senator Farrell was feted by his Chinese counterpart, Commerce Minister Wang Wentao, who urged Canberra to “jointly safeguard the multilateral trading system” with Beijing.
Senator Farrell accepted an invitation from the Chinese Commerce Minister to attend the China International Import Expo in Shanghai in November, according to a Chinese government readout of the meeting, which was held on the sidelines of the OECD. It will be the third consecutive year the Australian Trade Minister has attended the trade show, the most politically important in China.
This year’s trade show will be the first Senator Farrell will attend since Beijing ended all of the trade restrictions it had previously imposed on Australia.
In a dramatic reversal after their four years in China’s crosshairs, Australian farmers are benefiting at the expense of their American counterparts, who have been targeted by Beijing during its trade tussle with the Trump administration. Restrictions on American beef exports to China have given Australian farmers a near-monopoly of the country’s almost $5bn premium beef market.
Senator Farrell has explicitly distanced the Albanese government from the agenda of the Trump administration, which has tried to pressure allies and partners to reduce their economic relations with China.
“China is our largest trading partner,” Senator Farrell said recently. “We don’t want to do less business with China, we want to do more business with China.”
The duelling statements from the Chinese government come as Washington strong-arms Canberra to hike its defence budget to 3.5 per cent of GDP.
Beijing has not yet commented on the American pressure on Canberra, but senior researchers at government-linked institutions have given insight into the Chinese government’s thinking.
“You have to walk on a tightrope. Your future is deeply embedded in this region, which is the centre of gravity for economic prosperity,” Zhou Bo, a retired senior colonel in the People’s Liberation Army, told The Australian this week.
Mr Zhou, a senior fellow at Tsinghua University’s Centre for International Security and Strategy in Beijing, said Australia needed to be careful it did not follow the US into a conflict with the PLA in contested areas around China.
“Is it necessary for you to follow the US to challenge China? If you do not go to China, there’s no way China would come to Australia to fight against you,” he said. “This is a moment for Australia to do some soul-searching.”
https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/beijing-denounces-marles-over-china-threat-as-farrell-is-welcomed-to-shanghai/news-story/73bf1c8bec412604d02b92450e368d4e
https://www.mfa.gov.cn/mfa_eng/xw/fyrbt/lxjzh/202506/t20250603_11639655.html
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73598
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23120730 (040951ZJUN25) Notable: Child abuse survivors pay tribute to Victorian detective Denis Ryan - Former Victorian police officer Denis Ryan has been remembered for his courage in attempting to prosecute paedophile Catholic priest Monsignor John Day in the 1970s. Mr Ryan died on Tuesday at the age of 93. He was a detective based in Mildura in north-west Victoria when he was forced out of Victoria Police in 1972 for attempting to prosecute Monsignor Day. A year earlier, he had learned of multiple allegations against the priest for child sexual abuse and began his investigation, but was told to stop by his superiors. A contemporary of convicted paedophile priest Gerald Ridsdale, Monsignor Day has since been shown to be one of Australia's most prolific child sex abusers. Monsignor Day remained a priest until he died in 1978, aged 74. On Wednesday, Peter Hoysted - Mr Ryan's friend and co-author of the memoir Unholy Trinity: The Hunt for Paedophile Priest Monsignor John Day — led the tributes to Mr Ryan. "He was quite simply the best man I have ever met," Mr Hoysted said. "No sanctimony, a wicked sense of humour and courage to burn." It took more than 40 years for Victoria Police to apologise to Mr Ryan in 2016, but compensation was not made until two years later. "He never let up, refused numerous inducements offered which would have silenced him and allowed terrible crimes against children to remain in the shadows," Mr Hoysted said. John Fitzgibbon, who was abused by Monsignor Day, described Mr Ryan as "a great man" who validated the abuse local children had suffered. "He listened. [It was important] to be heard and believed because when we were younger, we didn't think anybody would believe it," Mr Fitzgibbon said. "But it was always Denis who was there for you. He believed it because he had statements from us younger ones." In 2015, Victoria Police admitted a conspiracy to cover up the crimes of Monsignor Day went right to the top, with Mr Ryan telling the Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse that "a Catholic mafia" within Victorian Police had thwarted his attempts to charge the priest. "His determination meant a lot to us all," Mr Fitzgibbon said. "He's a chap that's going to be really missed in our community and missed by a lot of victims that he still had time for."
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Child abuse survivors pay tribute to Victorian detective Denis Ryan
Tyrone Dalton - 4 June 2025
Former Victorian police officer Denis Ryan has been remembered for his courage in attempting to prosecute paedophile Catholic priest Monsignor John Day in the 1970s.
Mr Ryan died on Tuesday at the age of 93.
He was a detective based in Mildura in north-west Victoria when he was forced out of Victoria Police in 1972 for attempting to prosecute Monsignor Day.
A year earlier, he had learned of multiple allegations against the priest for child sexual abuse and began his investigation, but was told to stop by his superiors.
A contemporary of convicted paedophile priest Gerald Ridsdale, Monsignor Day has since been shown to be one of Australia's most prolific child sex abusers.
Monsignor Day remained a priest until he died in 1978, aged 74.
On Wednesday, Peter Hoysted — Mr Ryan's friend and co-author of the memoir Unholy Trinity: The Hunt for Paedophile Priest Monsignor John Day — led the tributes to Mr Ryan.
"He was quite simply the best man I have ever met," Mr Hoysted said.
"No sanctimony, a wicked sense of humour and courage to burn."
It took more than 40 years for Victoria Police to apologise to Mr Ryan in 2016, but compensation was not made until two years later.
"He never let up, refused numerous inducements offered which would have silenced him and allowed terrible crimes against children to remain in the shadows," Mr Hoysted said.
Ryan never forgot about victims
John Fitzgibbon, who was abused by Monsignor Day, described Mr Ryan as "a great man" who validated the abuse local children had suffered.
"He listened. [It was important] to be heard and believed because when we were younger, we didn't think anybody would believe it," Mr Fitzgibbon said.
"But it was always Denis who was there for you. He believed it because he had statements from us younger ones."
In 2015, Victoria Police admitted a conspiracy to cover up the crimes of Monsignor Day went right to the top, with Mr Ryan telling the Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse that "a Catholic mafia" within Victorian Police had thwarted his attempts to charge the priest.
"His determination meant a lot to us all," Mr Fitzgibbon said.
"He's a chap that's going to be really missed in our community and missed by a lot of victims that he still had time for."
Mr Ryan was named the Australia Day Citizen of the Year by Mildura Rural City Council in 2018.
Mildura Rural City councillor Ali Cupper, who also was a friend of Mr Ryan, said his story was one of international significance.
"People like him were unfortunately in the minority for a very long time, but who shone a light on one of the darkest chapters of our history — the rampant sexual abuse of children by people whose job it was to protect them," she said.
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-06-04/denis-ryan-vic-detective-dies-child-sex-abuse-catholic-church/105374772
https://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/victoria/he-dedicated-his-life-to-fighting-for-justice-for-victims-of-child-sexual-abuse-in-the-catholic-church-at-93-hero-detective-denis-ryan-has-died/news-story/bd1f723dd7b38ad2312f6f190ab148d1
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73599
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23120778 (041038ZJUN25) Notable: Video: PLA, the People’s Liberation Army of China, Peace-Loving Army. - PLA, the People’s Liberation Army of China. Peace-Loving Army, for the Chinese people and people of the world. - SpokespersonCHN
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73560
PLA, the People’s Liberation Army of China, Peace-Loving Army.
SpokespersonCHN发言人办公室
Sep 3, 2022
PLA, the People’s Liberation Army of China. Peace-Loving Army, for the Chinese people and people of the world.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cnyuaf3n9Fs
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73600
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23120783 (041041ZJUN25) Notable: Video: Archive: Chinese troops fire on protesters in Tiananmen Square - First broadcast 4 June 1989. Chinese troops opened fire on pro-democracy protesters in Beijing's Tiananmen Square on Saturday evening. The collection of students and labourers had been occupying the site for several weeks. Despite the outbreak of "unremitting gunfire", the protesters refused to leave. The BBC's Kate Adie reports from the scene. - BBC News
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73560
>>73599
Archive: Chinese troops fire on protesters in Tiananmen Square
BBC News
Jun 5, 2014
First broadcast 4 June 1989. Chinese troops opened fire on pro-democracy protesters in Beijing's Tiananmen Square on Saturday evening. The collection of students and labourers had been occupying the site for several weeks.
Despite the outbreak of "unremitting gunfire", the protesters refused to leave. The BBC's Kate Adie reports from the scene.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kMKvxJ-Js3A
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73601
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23120792 (041045ZJUN25) Notable: Video: How NBC Covered Tiananmen Square In 1989 - Warning: Viewers may find some images in this video disturbing. On the 30th anniversary of the Tiananmen Square uprising, we hit the archives and revisit our coverage. - NBC News
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73560
>>73599
How NBC Covered Tiananmen Square In 1989
NBC News
Jun 5, 2019
Warning: Viewers may find some images in this video disturbing. On the 30th anniversary of the Tiananmen Square uprising, we hit the archives and revisit our coverage.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lXJ6gHFME0w
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73602
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23120800 (041049ZJUN25) Notable: Video: Tiananmen Square Protests 1989: Chinese Soldiers Open Fire on Civilians - "World News" report from June 4, 1989: Chinese soldiers open fire on civilian, pro-democracy demonstrators in Beijing. - ABC News
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73560
>>73599
Tiananmen Square Protests 1989: Chinese Soldiers Open Fire on Civilians
ABC News
Jun 5, 2012
"World News" report from June 4, 1989: Chinese soldiers open fire on civilian, pro-democracy demonstrators in Beijing.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r9AvUuEPgvA
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73603
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23120805 (041051ZJUN25) Notable: Video: Tiananmen Square: Watch The 1989 Report On The Crackdown - It's 25 years since protests in Tiananmen Square, China, were brought to a bloody end by soldiers who killed hundreds of unarmed civilians. - Sky News
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73560
>>73599
Tiananmen Square: Watch The 1989 Report On The Crackdown
Sky News
Jun 4, 2014
It's 25 years since protests in Tiananmen Square, China, were brought to a bloody end by soldiers who killed hundreds of unarmed civilians.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yE7EkTRS96M
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73604
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23120815 (041056ZJUN25) Notable: Video: 1989: Tiananmen Square protests - Student protests in Tiananmen Square ended when Chinese troops fired on crowds, killing hundreds and wounding thousands. - CNN
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73560
>>73599
1989: Tiananmen Square protests
CNN
Oct 7, 2010
Student protests in Tiananmen Square ended when Chinese troops fired on crowds, killing hundreds and wounding thousands.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wNEW1Uh0lz0
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73605
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23120830 (041109ZJUN25) Notable: Video: Man vs. tank in Tiananmen square (1989) - A CNN crew covering the June 5, 1989, protests in Beijing recorded a man stopping a Chinese tank in Tiananmen Square. The story behind the iconic 'Tank Man' photo. - CNN
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73560
>>73599
>>73604
Man vs. tank in Tiananmen square (1989)
CNN
Jun 4, 2013
A CNN crew covering the June 5, 1989, protests in Beijing recorded a man stopping a Chinese tank in Tiananmen Square.
The story behind the iconic 'Tank Man' photo.
At first, Jeff Widener was annoyed by the man entering his shot.
Widener, a photographer with the Associated Press, was focusing his camera on a line of tanks in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square when out of the blue came this man in a white shirt and dark trousers, carrying what appeared to be shopping bags.
Widener thought the man was going to mess up the composition of his frame.
Little did he know that he was about to make one of the most iconic photos in history.
It was June 5, 1989, a day after Chinese troops began violently cracking down on pro-democracy demonstrators who had been in the square for over a month.
Widener had been in Beijing for a week to cover the protests, and he was hurt when the deadly crackdown began.
“I was hit in the head by a protester rock the early morning of June 4, and I was also suffering from the flu,” Widener said. “So I was quite ill and injured when I photographed ‘Tank Man’ from the sixth-floor balcony of the Beijing Hotel.”
The hotel had the best vantage point of the square, which was now under military control. An American exchange student, Kirk Martsen, helped sneak him in.
From the hotel balcony, Widener watched as the man confronted the lead tank, standing directly in front of it. The tank stopped and tried to go around the man. The man moved with the tank, blocking its path once again.
At one point during the standoff, the man climbed aboard the lead tank and appeared to speak to whoever was inside.
“I was about a half mile away from the row of tanks and so I could not really hear much,” Widener said.
The man was eventually pulled away by onlookers. To this day, we don’t know who he is and what happened to him. But he remains a powerful symbol of defiance.
By this point, the Chinese government was trying desperately to control the message going out to the world. Several days before the crackdown began, China had made efforts to stop all American news outlets, including CNN, from broadcasting live in Beijing.
“There was always a huge risk of being arrested and having film confiscated,” Widener said.
Martsen, the student who helped Widener get into the Beijing Hotel, put the “Tank Man” film in his underwear and smuggled it out of the hotel. The pictures were soon transmitted over telephone lines to the rest of the world.
Several media outlets took a photo of “Tank Man,” but Widener’s shot was the most used. It appeared on the front pages of newspapers all around the world, and it was nominated that year for a Pulitzer Prize.
“Though I knew the picture was highly acclaimed, it wasn't until years later when I saw an AOL post where my image was named one of the top 10 most memorable photos of all time. That was the first time that I realized I had accomplished something extraordinary,” Widener said.
The protests in Beijing started after the death of former communist leader Hu Yaobang on April 18, 1989. Hu had worked to move China toward a more open political system, and he had become a symbol of democratic reform. Mourning students marched to Tiananmen Square to call for a more democratic government.
Thousands of people joined the students over the next few weeks to protest China’s communist rulers.
A rally on May 19 drew an estimated 1.2 million people. A 33-foot-tall statue, the Goddess of Democracy, was built in four days and placed in the square.
“There was a carnival atmosphere and a lightness in the air,” Widener recalled. “I think most of the media was swept up in the whole affair, and I personally found it amazing that there was a statue of democracy across the Chang’an Boulevard which faced off against the giant Mao portrait symbolizing communism.”
Chinese troops began firing on demonstrators at about 1 a.m. on June 4. There has never been an official death toll released. Estimates range from several hundred to thousands.
It has also been estimated that as many as 10,000 people were arrested during and after the protests. Several dozen were executed.
Widener spent a week in Beijing after the crackdown began, then he got out.
“I was sick with the flu, suffering from a head injury and scared to death when I left for the airport,” he said.
To this day, his photos — and anything referring to the massacre — are banned in China.
https://edition.cnn.com/interactive/2019/05/world/tiananmen-square-tank-man-cnnphotos/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YeFzeNAHEhU
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73606
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23125030 (050934ZJUN25) Notable: ‘Video: Cowardly power grab’ says ‘heartbroken’ Premier ahead of election call - An emotional Tasmanian Premier has restated his intention to seek a snap early election, after losing a no-confidence vote in state parliament, accusing Labor of “cowardice” and a “grab for power”. The state’s House of Assembly voted 18 votes to 17 to express no confidence in Premier Jeremy Rockliff over alleged budget mismanagement, bungled ferries infrastructure and a privatisation push. The vote was tied 17 each way, with Labor Speaker Michelle O’Byrne using her casting vote to pass the motion. Ms O’Byrne said no one could expect her to vote confidence in a Liberal premier, while also warning the house would need to continue to sit long enough to pass a special supply bill to ensure public servants could be paid during any election period. Mr Rockliff restated his intention to seek an early election, after the no-confidence motion passed. “This will be an election that Tasmanians don’t want and that Tasmania cannot afford,” he told the Assembly. However, he said a snap poll was “on the heads” of Labor leader Dean Winter and the ALP. “This has been a selfish grab for power that we will fight and do our darnedest to win … This is not a fair fight; this is a cowardice act.”
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73594
>>73595
‘Cowardly power grab’ says ‘heartbroken’ Premier ahead of election call
MATTHEW DENHOLM - 5 June 2025
An emotional Tasmanian Premier has restated his intention to seek a snap early election, after losing a no-confidence vote in state parliament, accusing Labor of “cowardice” and a “grab for power”.
The state’s House of Assembly voted 18 votes to 17 to express no confidence in Premier Jeremy Rockliff over alleged budget mismanagement, bungled ferries infrastructure and a privatisation push.
The vote was tied 17 each way, with Labor Speaker Michelle O’Byrne using her casting vote to pass the motion.
Ms O’Byrne said no one could expect her to vote confidence in a Liberal premier, while also warning the house would need to continue to sit long enough to pass a special supply bill to ensure public servants could be paid during any election period.
Mr Rockliff restated his intention to seek an early election, after the no-confidence motion passed.
“This will be an election that Tasmanians don’t want and that Tasmania cannot afford,” he told the Assembly.
Broken Hearted
However, he said a snap poll was “on the heads” of Labor leader Dean Winter and the ALP. “This has been a selfish grab for power that we will fight and do our darnedest to win … This is not a fair fight; this is a cowardice act.”
Mr Rockliff, who appeared exhausted after a two-day debate, said he was disappointed that the no-confidence motion passed but vowed to “fight this all the way”. “This is a sad day for Tasmania,” he said.
Mr Rockliff said the minority government elected in March 2024 had achieved much for all MPs.
“We’ve got most of our agenda through because of our negotiations with each other,” he said. “That’s why I’m so disappointed, if not broken hearted, frankly.”
Mr Rockliff stood by the Hobart AFL stadium and Devils team. “I believe in this team so passionately because it’s working now – young kids right now believe and are aspiring,” he said.
The embattled leader, who may yet face a party room challenge to avoid an election Liberal strategies are worried will see the party go backward, said he would advise lieutenant governor Christopher Shanahan to call an election, the second within 15 months.
“This will be the advice that I will provide to the lieutenant governor: that an election is needed unless (Labor leader) Dean Winter forms government with the Greens,” he said. Mr Winter has ruled out such a move.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73607
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23125045 (050946ZJUN25) Notable: ‘We stand with Australia’: PNG drives defence pact amid China push - Papua New Guinea’s push for a defence treaty with Canberra sends a message to all competing interests in the region that the Pacific nation “stands with Australia” and supports the international rules-based order, PNG’s Defence Minister said in a landmark speech that nails the country’s security allegiances to the mast. Speaking at the Australian Strategic Policy Institute defence conference in Canberra on Wednesday, Billy Joseph said the recent circumnavigation of Australia by Chinese People’s Liberation Army navy ships, which also entered PNG waters, had underlined the potential threats faced by Pacific nations. “We, like everybody else, have a very strong economic partnership with China,” Mr Joseph said. “And I’m sure Australia also has the same, same as the US and everybody. But when it comes to security, we choose our traditional partners, which is Australia (and the) US. For us, the economy and security are intertwined, and we can’t separate one from the other. Therein lies opportunity as well as risks … that countries can use economy as a means to push the security interest. And that’s already happening,” he added, in unusually frank comments about Chinese economic coercion in the region. Mr Joseph said Australia and PNG were “tied at the hips”, not only by their geographical proximity but by a shared history of hardship and resilience during World War II. “That is why we have proposed from the PNG side that we should have a defence treaty,” he said.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73560
>>73577
‘We stand with Australia’: PNG drives defence pact amid China push
AMANDA HODGE - 4 June 2025
1/2
Papua New Guinea’s push for a defence treaty with Canberra sends a message to all competing interests in the region that the Pacific nation “stands with Australia” and supports the international rules-based order, PNG’s Defence Minister said in a landmark speech that nails the country’s security allegiances to the mast.
Speaking at the Australian Strategic Policy Institute defence conference in Canberra on Wednesday, Billy Joseph said the recent circumnavigation of Australia by Chinese People’s Liberation Army navy ships, which also entered PNG waters, had underlined the potential threats faced by Pacific nations.
“We, like everybody else, have a very strong economic partnership with China,” Mr Joseph said.
“And I’m sure Australia also has the same, same as the US and everybody. But when it comes to security, we choose our traditional partners, which is Australia (and the) US.
“For us, the economy and security are intertwined, and we can’t separate one from the other. Therein lies opportunity as well as risks … that countries can use economy as a means to push the security interest. And that’s already happening,” he added, in unusually frank comments about Chinese economic coercion in the region.
Mr Joseph said Australia and PNG were “tied at the hips”, not only by their geographical proximity but by a shared history of hardship and resilience during World War II. “That is why we have proposed from the PNG side that we should have a defence treaty,” he said.
“We send a message with all these competing interests in the region that PNG stands with Australia and those countries that share the same values … countries that subscribe to international rules based order and a free and open Indo-Pacific.”
The Defence Minister’s comments represent a significant shift in public messaging for PNG, the Pacific Island region’s largest nation, and a win for the federal government amid intensifying geopolitical rivalry with China that could set a precedent for its dealings with other Pacific island states.
Australia has been pushing for years for a legally binding defence treaty with PNG – a country with vast maritime zones that lies just 4km from Australia at its closest point – but was forced to settle for a downgraded bilateral security agreement in 2023 because of PNG reservations over such a commitment.
That it is now the PNG government pushing for the treaty – its first since it gained independence from Australia 50 years ago – reflects both rapidly changing global circumstances and Prime Minister James Marape’s ambitions to build up his country’s defence forces so that it can be a key contributor to regional security.
“It’s a huge step and in terms of the rest of the region it puts PNG as the most closely aligned (nation) to Australia on regional security interests,” said Lowy Institute Pacific Islands program director Mihai Sora.
“Australia has always been the preferred security partner of the region, but Pacific Island leaders have been reluctant to go out on a limb and say so publicly, particularly in recent years as China’s economic influence has grown throughout the region.
“So this is a huge change in public messaging and not something Canberra would be used to hearing from a Pacific leader.”
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73608
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23125059 (050959ZJUN25) Notable: Video: Former Australian PM Malcolm Turnbull: I'm sure that Trump will not get his way with China - Malcolm Turnbull says that China's relatively consistent and measured approach compared to the U.S.'s erraticism will be welcomed by many countries, that it is dawning on Trump he cannot bully China, and that Trump's belief that "might is right" is very unattractive to middle powers like Australia who have to work together and stand up for their values. - CNBC International Live
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50771 (pb)
>>73560
>>73484
Former Australian PM Malcolm Turnbull: I'm sure that Trump will not get his way with China
CNBC International Live
Jun 5, 2025
Malcolm Turnbull says that China's relatively consistent and measured approach compared to the U.S.'s erraticism will be welcomed by many countries, that it is dawning on Trump he cannot bully China, and that Trump's belief that "might is right" is very unattractive to middle powers like Australia who have to work together and stand up for their values.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SXdZ6uiekdk
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73609
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23125063 (051003ZJUN25) Notable: Video: AUKUS has serious problems, Australia probably won't receive any submarines: Malcolm Turnbull - Malcolm Turnbull, former Prime Minister of Australia, says that AUKUS wasn't a very good deal for the country and that he thinks President Trump would love the deal as the U.S. would receive money without necessarily having to deliver anything in return. - CNBC International Live
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73432
>>73441
AUKUS has serious problems, Australia probably won't receive any submarines: Malcolm Turnbull
CNBC International Live
Jun 5, 2025
Malcolm Turnbull, former Prime Minister of Australia, says that AUKUS wasn't a very good deal for the country and that he thinks President Trump would love the deal as the U.S. would receive money without necessarily having to deliver anything in return.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ImYVFH5wiUo
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73610
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23134162 (070230ZJUN25) Notable: Visa refusal sparks fresh concerns Solomon Islands may block Taipei from Pacific forum - The Solomon Islands government blocked a group of Taiwanese officials from entering the Pacific country earlier this year, stirring fresh concerns in Taipei that it might be locked out of a key regional meeting in Honiara later this year. Solomon Islands will host the Pacific Islands Forum leaders meeting in September, and signalled last year that it might break with a long running precedent and refuse visas to Taiwanese officials who want to meet with their three remaining Pacific diplomatic allies on the sidelines. Both Australian and Pacific officials insist that the Solomon Islands government has given them private assurances this year that it will not take that step. But the ABC has been told that when a small group of officials from Taiwan's Ministry of Foreign Affairs applied to enter Solomon Islands in March - largely to begin planning the logistics for its PIF delegation — their visa applications were rejected. Australian government sources have said Solomon Islands has since reassured them again that Taiwan's representatives will not be blocked in September, but that this directive was still "working its way through the system", suggesting the decision was an error. A spokesperson from the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade (DFAT) told the ABC it was "working closely" with Solomon Islands on preparations for the leaders meeting, "as we do with every host". "There has been no change to arrangements regarding Taiwan's engagement with the Pacific Islands Forum, which have been in place since agreed by leaders in 1992," they said.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73475
>>73577
Visa refusal sparks fresh concerns Solomon Islands may block Taipei from Pacific forum
Stephen Dziedzic and Chrisnrita Leong - 6 June 2025
1/2
The Solomon Islands government blocked a group of Taiwanese officials from entering the Pacific country earlier this year, stirring fresh concerns in Taipei that it might be locked out of a key regional meeting in Honiara later this year.
Solomon Islands will host the Pacific Islands Forum leaders meeting in September, and signalled last year that it might break with a long running precedent and refuse visas to Taiwanese officials who want to meet with their three remaining Pacific diplomatic allies on the sidelines.
Both Australian and Pacific officials insist that the Solomon Islands government has given them private assurances this year that it will not take that step.
But the ABC has been told that when a small group of officials from Taiwan's Ministry of Foreign Affairs applied to enter Solomon Islands in March — largely to begin planning the logistics for its PIF delegation — their visa applications were rejected.
Australian government sources have said Solomon Islands has since reassured them again that Taiwan's representatives will not be blocked in September, but that this directive was still "working its way through the system", suggesting the decision was an error.
A spokesperson from the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade (DFAT) told the ABC it was "working closely" with Solomon Islands on preparations for the leaders meeting, "as we do with every host".
"There has been no change to arrangements regarding Taiwan's engagement with the Pacific Islands Forum, which have been in place since agreed by leaders in 1992," they said.
"The (meeting) is an opportunity for all Forum members to come together to ensure our region is well placed to pursue our shared interests, deepen regional cooperation and strengthen PIF unity."
One Pacific island government source also told the ABC that the Forum Secretariat and Pacific leaders were confident Taiwan would be able to participate in the Honiara meeting without any issues.
But the March incident has still stirred anxiety in Taipei, which has been fighting a losing battle with Beijing to maintain diplomatic allies in the Pacific, and which fears China is succeeding in its efforts to marginalise it in the region.
Solomon Islands has cut off all official contact with Taiwan in the wake of its decision to switch diplomatic ties to Beijing in 2019, and last year threw its weight behind China's declaration that it will "reunify" the self-ruled island with the mainland.
Solomon Islands last year also backed Beijing's push to strip Taiwan of its status as a development partner for the Pacific Islands Forum (PIF).
That frustrated leaders from the three Pacific nations which retain diplomatic ties with Taiwan, with Palau's President Surangel Whipps even warning that if Taiwan is locked out it could ignite a dispute like the "PIF split" which plunged the organisation into chaos in 2021.
Mr Whipps said earlier this week that he had heard Taiwan was having "some difficulty gaining access" to the meeting, and stressed that it was critical Palau be able to hold meetings with its diplomatic partner in Honiara.
Solomon Islands has not yet explained why the Taiwanese officials were refused visas in March.
The Director of Immigration in Solomon Islands, Chris Akosawa, pointed out that Solomon Islands has recently tightened entry restrictions on Taiwan passport holders, but referred the ABC to the Solomon Islands Foreign Ministry for comment.
The ABC sent questions to the Foreign Ministry, but didn't receive a response.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73611
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23134204 (070242ZJUN25) Notable: Video: PM insists biosecurity is 'first priority' as beef tops agenda in upcoming US trade talks - Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has vowed not to compromise biosecurity as trade negotiations over beef are set to top the agenda in crucial talks with US President Donald Trump. Trump singled out Australia's ban on US beef during a Liberation Day tariff announcement in April, claiming Australia "won't take any of our beef" due to a concern over mad cow disease. Cattle Australia disputes that claim, because a ban on US beef was lifted in 2019, provided the cattle is born, raised and slaughtered in the US. But concerns over "mixed herds" mean beef from the US rarely makes it to Australian plates. US exporters are currently unable to prove their herds don't include beef that was born in Mexico and Canada, which are still rated a biosecurity risk, then later slaughtered in the US. "We haven't been assured there's a system that allows the appropriate tracing of animals, or appropriate traceback of animals," Cattle Australia chief executive Dr Chris Parker said. A review is underway into whether that should change, which could be used as a bargaining chip for Trump to drop all tariffs against Australia.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73550
>>73578
>>73583
PM insists biosecurity is 'first priority' as beef tops agenda in upcoming US trade talks
Eleanor Wilson - Jun 6, 2025
Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has vowed not to compromise biosecurity as trade negotiations over beef are set to top the agenda in crucial talks with US President Donald Trump.
Trump singled out Australia's ban on US beef during a Liberation Day tariff announcement in April, claiming Australia "won't take any of our beef" due to a concern over mad cow disease.
Cattle Australia disputes that claim, because a ban on US beef was lifted in 2019, provided the cattle is born, raised and slaughtered in the US.
But concerns over "mixed herds" mean beef from the US rarely makes it to Australian plates.
US exporters are currently unable to prove their herds don't include beef that was born in Mexico and Canada, which are still rated a biosecurity risk, then later slaughtered in the US.
"We haven't been assured there's a system that allows the appropriate tracing of animals, or appropriate traceback of animals," Cattle Australia chief executive Dr Chris Parker said.
A review is underway into whether that should change, which could be used as a bargaining chip for Trump to drop all tariffs against Australia.
"You shouldn't cut a deal at any cost, and particularly the cost of Australian biosecurity," Nationals leader David Littleproud said.
"This will decimate the agricultural sector if we blink and allow President Trump to be able to roll over us and our biosecurity standards."
Albanese today assured the industry he would not jeopardise biosecurity during upcoming negotiations.
"Our first priority is biosecurity and there'll be no compromise on that," he said.
"If things can be sorted out, in a way that protects our biosecurity, of course, we don't just say no.
"I deal with people, whoever they are, in the same respectful way. I expect respect back.
"I'm the prime minister of Australia, we don't have a subservient relationship to any nation."
Albanese is expected to meet Trump face-to-face within the next two weeks, likely on the sidelines of the G7 meeting in Canada.
That meeting could make or break trade negotiations concerning several industries.
https://www.9news.com.au/national/pm-insists-biosecurity-is-first-priority-as-beef-tops-agenda-in-upcoming-us-trade-talks/61f0d34b-0310-497f-9397-3a0b527535c4
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QE9OX6UJCuk
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73612
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23139131 (081008ZJUN25) Notable: Israeli influencer Hillel Fuld’s visa cancelled for Australian speaking tour - The Albanese government has cancelled the visa of high-profile Israeli-American tech influencer Hillel Fuld, citing concerns that his presence in the country may pose a risk to “the health, safety or good order” of the Australian community, particularly among Muslim Australians. The Department of Home Affairs quietly cancelled Mr Fuld’s travel visa this week, accusing him of using social media to deny “documented atrocities” in Gaza, promote Islamophobic views, and spread inflammatory content that could incite division amid heightened community tensions. Mr Fuld was due to speak at fundraising events in Melbourne and Sydney later this month hosted by Magen David Adom Australia - the local affiliate of Israel’s national emergency medical and blood service. The events were billed as discussions on Israeli innovation and technology, with Mr Fuld expected to share insights on the tech sector and his personal experiences. Funds raised were to go toward the construction of a new ambulance station in southern Israel. But according to departmental records obtained by The Australian, Home Affairs officials concluded that Mr Fuld had a documented pattern of sharing provocative content, including broad attacks on the Palestinian identity, denial of “documented atrocities” in Gaza, and claims that large segments of the Muslim population support terrorism. One post cited in the visa cancellation decision was a March 2024 Instagram video in which Mr Fuld dismissed as “propaganda” reports by international media outlets that Israeli troops had opened fire on starving Palestinians looking for food aid in Gaza, killing over 100.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73549
Israeli influencer Hillel Fuld’s visa cancelled for Australian speaking tour
MOHAMMAD ALFARES - 8 June 2025
1/2
The Albanese government has cancelled the visa of high-profile Israeli-American tech influencer Hillel Fuld, citing concerns that his presence in the country may pose a risk to “the health, safety or good order” of the Australian community, particularly among Muslim Australians.
The Department of Home Affairs quietly cancelled Mr Fuld’s travel visa this week, accusing him of using social media to deny “documented atrocities” in Gaza, promote Islamophobic views, and spread inflammatory content that could incite division amid heightened community tensions.
Mr Fuld was due to speak at fundraising events in Melbourne and Sydney later this month hosted by Magen David Adom Australia — the local affiliate of Israel’s national emergency medical and blood service.
The events were billed as discussions on Israeli innovation and technology, with Mr Fuld expected to share insights on the tech sector and his personal experiences. Funds raised were to go toward the construction of a new ambulance station in southern Israel.
But according to departmental records obtained by The Australian, Home Affairs officials concluded that Mr Fuld had a documented pattern of sharing provocative content, including broad attacks on the Palestinian identity, denial of “documented atrocities” in Gaza, and claims that large segments of the Muslim population support terrorism.
One post cited in the visa cancellation decision was a March 2024 Instagram video in which Mr Fuld dismissed as “propaganda” reports by international media outlets that Israeli troops had opened fire on starving Palestinians looking for food aid in Gaza, killing over 100.
“There was no massacre of Palestinians in Gaza today,” he said in the clip. “Palestinians trampled each other as they fought for the aid that the IDF sent in.”
In a lengthy post on X published in January 2025, Mr Fuld asserted that 10 to 15 per cent of the world’s Muslims were “radicalised,” labelled “radical Islam” a “global plague,” and compared Gazan civilians to Nazi-era Germans, claiming that they should be “treated as such”. He also argued it was not “safe to assume that all children in Gaza are innocent.”
“The visa holder has posted on multiple platforms and made statements denying credible documented atrocities in Gaza and Islamophobia rhetoric,“ the decision record states.
The decision has been condemned by the Australian Jewish Association, which labelled it anti-Semitic and politically motivated.
“In light of the fact that the Labor Government is targeting Jewish visitors by cancelling visas, AJA will issue a formal warning to Jews around the world to consider the risks of travelling to Australia,” AJA CEO Robert Gregory said.
“There is a real concern that Jewish visitors may have their visas revoked after flights and accommodation are booked.”
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73613
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23139134 (081014ZJUN25) Notable: Muslim Vote to support candidates in NSW, Victorian elections - A pro-Palestine political movement that failed to win a seat at the May federal election has vowed to push on and support candidates for the upcoming Victorian and NSW state elections. The Muslim Vote endorsed independent candidates in three Labor-held seats - Watson and Blaxland in western Sydney and Calwell in Melbourne’s north-west. Its greatest success was in Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke’s seat of Watson, where independent Ziad Basyouny was the second-most popular candidate on a two-candidate preferred basis. Burke, who was accused of “vote buying” after holding pre-election mass citizenship ceremonies in Sydney’s culturally diverse western suburbs, still comfortably won the seat, receiving 66 per cent of the vote after preferences were distributed. In Education Minister Jason Clare’s seat of Blaxland, Ahmed Ouf won 18.76 per cent of first preferences, but the Liberal candidate was second-preferred. In Calwell, Samim Moslih only garnered 6.85 per cent of first preferences. Despite failing to win a seat, Muslim Vote convenor Sheikh Wesam Charkawi said the results were a “significant step” that “demonstrated the model works”. In each seat, the independent campaign ate into both Labor and the Liberals’ first preference vote distribution from the 2022 federal election. “One form of success in the political arena is unseating the sitting minister. Another form is winning hearts and minds of the masses, setting the foundations for future challenges,” Charkawi said. “We’ve had an avalanche of people reach out to us post-election, either to be candidates or to support our work … The community isn’t backing down. We all want to continue.”
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73420
Muslim Vote to support candidates in NSW, Victorian elections
Mostafa Rachwani - June 7, 2025
A pro-Palestine political movement that failed to win a seat at the May federal election has vowed to push on and support candidates for the upcoming Victorian and NSW state elections.
The Muslim Vote endorsed independent candidates in three Labor-held seats – Watson and Blaxland in western Sydney and Calwell in Melbourne’s north-west.
Its greatest success was in Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke’s seat of Watson, where independent Ziad Basyouny was the second-most popular candidate on a two-candidate preferred basis.
Burke, who was accused of “vote buying” after holding pre-election mass citizenship ceremonies in Sydney’s culturally diverse western suburbs, still comfortably won the seat, receiving 66 per cent of the vote after preferences were distributed.
In Education Minister Jason Clare’s seat of Blaxland, Ahmed Ouf won 18.76 per cent of first preferences, but the Liberal candidate was second-preferred. In Calwell, Samim Moslih only garnered 6.85 per cent of first preferences.
Despite failing to win a seat, Muslim Vote convenor Sheikh Wesam Charkawi said the results were a “significant step” that “demonstrated the model works”.
In each seat, the independent campaign ate into both Labor and the Liberals’ first preference vote distribution from the 2022 federal election.
“One form of success in the political arena is unseating the sitting minister. Another form is winning hearts and minds of the masses, setting the foundations for future challenges,” Charkawi said.
“We’ve had an avalanche of people reach out to us post-election, either to be candidates or to support our work ... The community isn’t backing down. We all want to continue.”
The Muslim Vote will be supporting Victorian lower house candidates at the 2026 state election, and upper and lower house candidates at the NSW election in 2027, Charkawi said, however their target seats are yet to be determined.
Charkawi said he wanted to build on the result, adding the group had NSW Premier Chris Minns in their sights.
“We aim to challenge [in] many NSW seats,” he said.
Charkawi criticised NSW Labor for its position on the war in Gaza and response to pro-Palestinian protests in Sydney. He said the Minns government had “weaponised police against peaceful protesters, smeared pro-Palestine voices, and pandered to far-right hysteria while Palestinians are slaughtered”.
Electoral analyst Ben Raue believed there were some NSW seats the group could contest based on results from particular booths across Blaxland and Watson.
Basyouny won more than 30 per cent of first preference votes in areas around Greenacre and Punchbowl, within the state seat of Bankstown. Similarly, Ouf won more than 40 per cent of the vote at booths in the state seats of Auburn and Granville.
“There’s potential there,” he said, noting the group would need to move beyond campaigning on a single issue, and engage other communities, as no federal or state seat had a single dominant ethnic community.
“They still have some way to go before they can win,” he said.
https://www.theage.com.au/politics/nsw/muslim-vote-to-support-candidates-in-nsw-victorian-elections-20250605-p5m553.html
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73614
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23139142 (081021ZJUN25) Notable: ‘Dump Jeremy Rockliff to stop election disaster’, senior Tasmanian Liberals, business leaders tell party - Tasmanian Liberal MPs are under mounting pressure - from senior party figures and business leaders – to dump Premier Jeremy Rockliff to prevent an early election, as MPs blamed the AFL for the state’s political crisis. Federal Liberal frontbencher Jonathon Duniam on Friday described Mr Rockliff’s push to send Tasmanians back to the polls for a second time within 15 months as “nuts”. The state parliamentary Liberal Party is so far standing by Mr Rockliff, who is planning to request a snap election rather than resign, after the House of Assembly passed a no-confidence motion in him on Thursday. Senator Duniam, a leading party conservative, told The Australian the PLP needed to take “whatever steps necessary” to prevent the snap poll. “Unless my colleagues are 100 per cent certain that the voters of Tasmania are not going to punish them for sending them to an early election, they should be taking whatever steps are necessary,” Senator Duniam said. “Going to an election will be a bad outcome. The PLP needs to have a good, long think about this.” Some MPs share Senator Duniam’s concerns, with Liberal Party strategists warning it will lose seats and potentially government at any poll. However, most are so far standing with Mr Rockliff, believing an election within 12 months is likely anyway, and preferring to go now with Mr Rockliff as leader than later with a less popular alternative.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73594
>>73595
>>73606
‘Dump Jeremy Rockliff to stop election disaster’, senior Tasmanian Liberals, business leaders tell party
MATTHEW DENHOLM - June 06, 2025
Tasmanian Liberal MPs are under mounting pressure – from senior party figures and business leaders – to dump Premier Jeremy Rockliff to prevent an early election, as MPs blamed the AFL for the state’s political crisis.
Federal Liberal frontbencher Jonathon Duniam on Friday described Mr Rockliff’s push to send Tasmanians back to the polls for a second time within 15 months as “nuts”.
The state parliamentary Liberal Party is so far standing by Mr Rockliff, who is planning to request a snap election rather than resign, after the House of Assembly passed a no-confidence motion in him on Thursday.
Senator Duniam, a leading party conservative, told The Australian the PLP needed to take “whatever steps necessary” to prevent the snap poll.
“Unless my colleagues are 100 per cent certain that the voters of Tasmania are not going to punish them for sending them to an early election, they should be taking whatever steps are necessary,” Senator Duniam said.
“Going to an election will be a bad outcome. The PLP needs to have a good, long think about this.”
Liberal MPs have until Tuesday to do so, with all parties agreeing to pass an emergency supply bill – to keep public services going – before any election call.
Some MPs share Senator Duniam’s concerns, with Liberal Party strategists warning it will lose seats and potentially government at any poll. However, most are so far standing with Mr Rockliff, believing an election within 12 months is likely anyway, and preferring to go now with Mr Rockliff as leader than later with a less popular alternative.
The Tasmanian Minerals, Manufacturing and Energy Council told The Australian continuity of government was more important than continuity of leader, for investment and business confidence. “Government continuity is first and foremost, as opposed to who is the premier,” said council chief executive Ray Mostogl.
“Continuing on the term of the government is the best thing to do.
“(An election) just opens up a lot more variables in terms of what the business environment is going to look like.”
A second state election within 500 days would have a “big impact” on business, he said. “Expenditure on new infrastructure projects that the government had in the pipeline effectively all gets put on hold. And … it’s risky for any business to proceed with a growth plan that has any reliance on a state government decision.”
Political figures on Friday also turned on the AFL, blaming its demands for a $1bn stadium at Hobart’s Macquarie Point – at a time of ballooning state debt – for precipitating the crisis.
“I find it gobsmacking that anyone from any club or the AFL central organisation has the gall to tell Tasmania to get its house in order, when its demands on our state have in part brought the parliament to the brink of an election,” Senator Duniam said.
“If they’re genuine about wanting Tasmanians to have their own team, then meet us where we’re at: a small state, with limited revenue, a small population.”
Some of the AFL’s demands – which include a roofed stadium, precluding Test cricket, a contentious, problematic site, and tight timelines with financial penalties – were “unreasonable”, he said.
“I’d love to see a stadium built, but here we are with a (minority) government on its knees and the AFL pretending it’s business as usual,” Senator Duniam said.
“They should find the decency to help us find a pathway to a stadium that doesn’t burden us the way their current demands do.”
The no confidence motion did not mention the stadium, which the government is fast-tracking outside the normal planning process, but Greens and crossbenchers, who hold the balance of power, cited it as a major grievance.
Even MPs who did not support the no confidence motion backed Senator Duniam. “The AFL has failed to acknowledge the turmoil the stadium is causing,” said independent Rebekah Pentland.
Greens leader Rosalie Woodruff said the Liberals could avoid an election by choosing a new leader and “by dropping their appalling stadium”.
Mr Rockliff declined to comment but was still vowing to ask the Governor for an election, once the special supply bill passed on Tuesday.
He and Labor leader Dean Winter, who moved the no-confidence motion, blamed each other for the likely election.
Mr Rockliff accused Mr Winter of a “power grab”, but Mr Winter said the Premier’s failures and budget mismanagement were behind the motion, backed by the Greens and three crossbenchers.
The AFL was contacted for comment.
https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/dump-rockliff-to-stop-election-disaster-senior-libs-business-leaders-tell-party/news-story/25a27afcc6dbe5655b71d2810cdcc26d
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73615
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23144364 (090230ZJUN25) Notable: Video: Scott Morrison receives country's highest honour for leading Australia through COVID crisis - Scott Morrison has credited Australians for their "courage and resilience" in the face of crises, including the Black Summer bushfires and a once-in-a-lifetime pandemic, as he receives the country's highest honour for his leadership. The 30th prime minister has been appointed a Companion of the Order of Australia (AC) for his "eminent service" to the country and direction of the national COVID response, as part of the King's Birthday honours. Mr Morrison was prime minister for just over three and a half years - between 2018 and 2022 — a period in which he said, "we were hit with pretty much every crisis you can imagine". "From natural disasters to a global pandemic, once in a hundred years, and of course the threats we faced in our region, and a recession caused by that global pandemic," he said in a sit-down interview before his appointment was publicly announced. "Through all of this Australians were just incredible and the one assumption I made is that that's how they would be - their character would pull them through and that's the basis on which we built the policies that helped us to achieve that." The AC is the highest award in the King's Birthday honour list, designed to recognise achievements "in service to Australia or humanity at large". Former prime ministers are typically appointed, but the time between their service and the recognition varies. Mr Morrison's appointment - three years after he lost the prime ministership — also notes his contributions to international engagement, economic initiatives and national security, particularly through his role in securing the AUKUS agreement. The latter was named by the former prime minister as one of his proudest achievements in office, among other work he said his government undertook to strengthen Australia's sovereignty.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Scott Morrison receives country's highest honour for leading Australia through COVID crisis
Maani Truu - 9 June 2025
1/2
Scott Morrison has credited Australians for their "courage and resilience" in the face of crises, including the Black Summer bushfires and a once-in-a-lifetime pandemic, as he receives the country's highest honour for his leadership.
The 30th prime minister has been appointed a Companion of the Order of Australia (AC) for his "eminent service" to the country and direction of the national COVID response, as part of the King's Birthday honours.
Mr Morrison was prime minister for just over three and a half years — between 2018 and 2022 — a period in which he said, "we were hit with pretty much every crisis you can imagine".
"From natural disasters to a global pandemic, once in a hundred years, and of course the threats we faced in our region, and a recession caused by that global pandemic," he said in a sit-down interview before his appointment was publicly announced.
"Through all of this Australians were just incredible and the one assumption I made is that that's how they would be — their character would pull them through and that's the basis on which we built the policies that helped us to achieve that."
The AC is the highest award in the King's Birthday honour list, designed to recognise achievements "in service to Australia or humanity at large". Former prime ministers are typically appointed, but the time between their service and the recognition varies.
Mr Morrison's appointment — three years after he lost the prime ministership — also notes his contributions to international engagement, economic initiatives and national security, particularly through his role in securing the AUKUS agreement.
The latter was named by the former prime minister as one of his proudest achievements in office, among other work he said his government undertook to strengthen Australia's sovereignty.
"The resilience and sovereignty of the country, whether it was building our resilience against disasters of the future, having dealt with them at the time, our economic resilience, incredibly important, the way we bounced back after COVID was incredible, and we had invested heavily in our small business sector in particular," he said.
"It really was about protecting our sovereignty and building that up so we could deal with the significant challenges into the future."
Mr Morrison's term coincided with the height of the COVID pandemic, when international and state borders were slammed shut, Australians were locked down in their homes, and thousands of businesses were forced to close.
Just months after the emergence of the virus in China, the former Liberal leader made the at-the-time unprecedented call to ban international travellers from entering Australia — a decision that likely staved off the crisis locally but also left many Australians stranded overseas and others separated from friends and family abroad.
International borders remained closed for almost two years, only reopening to vaccinated travellers in early 2022 after the Omicron variant had swept the country.
During the pandemic, Mr Morrison, along with then-treasurer Josh Frydenberg, also oversaw the creation of the almost $90 billion JobKeeper scheme wage subsidy scheme, one of the largest economic support programs ever introduced.
Asked if he had any regrets from that era this week, Mr Morrison said you "don't get everything right, particularly when you face that many challenges".
"But I tend not to dwell too much on that, because frankly there was just the next challenge coming the next day," he said.
"You do the best job you can on the day and then you shake yourself off the next day and you do it all again."
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73616
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23144424 (090240ZJUN25) Notable: King’s Birthday honours: Scott Morrison says Labor’s weaponisation of Brittany Higgins a ‘new low mark’ - Scott Morrison has urged the Coalition to embrace policies that give people economic choices in life and mount the case that governments in a post-pandemic era can only “treat symptoms for so long before it starts eroding your capacity to have a strong economy”. The former Liberal prime minister and treasurer - awarded a Companion of the Order of Australia in the King’s Birthday honours list – said the Covid years had fundamentally changed the way Australians think about the major parties and economic security. Mr Morrison’s legacies include striking the AUKUS deal and re-engaging the Quad, his government’s management of the Covid pandemic, standing up to Chinese aggression, record mental health funding, winning the 2019 election just nine months after replacing Malcolm Turnbull, strengthening economic, military and diplomatic ties with the Association of Southeast Asian Nations, Japan and Israel, and securing free-trade agreements with India and Britain. Mr Morrison’s tenure as Australia’s 30th prime minister from 2018-22 also featured lowlights, including the fallout from the Robodebt scandal, his government’s handling of Ms Higgins’ alleged sexual assault, China’s trade bans, the furore over his family holiday in Hawaii during the Black Summer bushfires, and Labor’s criticism over him secretly swearing himself into multiple ministries during the pandemic. “The weaponisation of natural disasters, and even what happened over the alleged events in Parliament House with Brittany Higgins, which you know now plays out in the courts, the weaponisation of these things politically by my opponents, both within the parliament and outside it, I think was a new low mark,” Mr Morrison said. “There had been the practice that in times of natural disaster, there’s strong bipartisanship, and I can’t say I enjoyed a lot of that. The weaponisation, whether it was of Covid or of bushfires or other things, when I and my team were out there … the selective attacks that were made were very disappointing, but you had to push through them.”
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73615
King’s Birthday honours: Scott Morrison says Labor’s weaponisation of Brittany Higgins a ‘new low mark’
GEOFF CHAMBERS - 9 June 2025
1/2
Scott Morrison has urged the Coalition to embrace policies that give people economic choices in life and mount the case that governments in a post-pandemic era can only “treat symptoms for so long before it starts eroding your capacity to have a strong economy”.
The former Liberal prime minister and treasurer – awarded a Companion of the Order of Australia in the King’s Birthday honours list – said the Covid years had fundamentally changed the way Australians think about the major parties and economic security.
Mr Morrison, 57, who led the nation through the pandemic and deployed big-spending policies to insulate the country from economic and health shocks, warned that the goalposts have now shifted for political parties who simply promised to fix the budget.
Reflecting on massive losses suffered by the Liberal Party at the 2022 and 2025 elections, he described a “collision of significant forces”, including the disaggregation of politics that started with the Greens, Democrats and One Nation in the 1990s and has manifested in the rise of Climate 200-backed teal independents.
As Opposition Leader Sussan Ley conducts a review of Peter Dutton’s policies and the Coalition’s disastrous May 3 election defeat, Mr Morrison said “on issues like economic and national security, I think we (the Liberal Party) still retain, particularly on the latter, a very strong brand”.
“But on economic security, I question whether people think about economic security the same way they did before Covid,” Mr Morrison said in an interview with The Australian.
“Economic security can equally mean people looking to the government to insulate them from economic cycles, and we’ve seen a lot of that in government policy post-Covid. We had to do it in Covid to save the country but we were also resolute about turning it off.
“We’ve become more focused on treating the symptoms than treating the cause in policy. And that’s obviously a mantle for the Coalition to take up now.
“It’s not just about being responsible financial managers, or being stronger on economic growth and the things that produce that, be they lower taxes (or) sensible and flexible industrial arrangements.
“You can’t just say, oh, we’re going to balance the budget. Well, what does that mean? How is that helping me? How does that address the opportunities that I have?”
Among other recipients of King’s Birthday Honours are film director Baz Luhrmann (Companion of the Order of Australia AC); his costume designer wife Catherine Martin ( Companion of the Order of Australia AC); Olympian Nicole Livingstone (Officer of the Order of Australia AO); former NSW Police Force commissioner Naguib ‘Nick’ Kaldas (Officer of the Order of Australia AO); media, publishing figure Deborah Hutton (Medal of the Order of Australia OAM); former Business Council of Australia chief Jennifer Westacott (Companion of the Order of Australia AC); and broadcaster, writer Phillip Adams (Companion of the Order of Australia in the General Division).
Mr Morrison said the Liberals and Nationals have an opportunity to “make that case again for economic policy that gives people economic choices in life”.
“A strong economy is what you need to fund essential services. You don’t have a pension system, you don’t have a hospital system, you don’t have defence forces if you don’t have a strong economy. You can’t take that for granted, and you can only treat symptoms for so long before it starts eroding your capacity to have a strong economy that underpins everything else,” he said.
Mr Morrison lamented as a “new low mark” Labor’s ruthless weaponisation of major events during his tenure as prime minister, including natural disasters, Covid and sexual assault allegations made by former Liberal staffer Brittany Higgins.
Ahead of Anthony Albanese’s first in-person meeting with Donald Trump at the G7 summit in Canada next week, Mr Morrison also said Australia must shift from what is “effectively a peacetime operation to a warlike preparation” on the pathway to defence spending of 3 per cent of GDP.
The co-architect of the AUKUS submarine and defence pact, who recently returned from a visit to war-torn Ukraine, said “there’s a lot of inertia in our processes built up over 50 years or more that were geared to another time, and we need to orientate to a different time”.
Mr Morrison, an immigration minister under Tony Abbott who “stopped the boats” and established Operation Sovereign Borders, has been awarded an AC for “eminent service to the people and parliament of Australia” with notable contributions to global engagement, the Covid response, economic initiatives and national security enhancements headlined by AUKUS.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73617
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23144488 (090250ZJUN25) Notable: No regrets for Morrison on pandemic-era actions - Scott Morrison has called out blanket vaccine mandates and school closures during the pandemic, defended his creation of the national cabinet and backed big-spending measures that ensured the nation’s economy “rocketed out the other side of Covid”. The former prime minister, who does not regret his government’s call to not bank a surplus at the end of 2019, said hard decisions were made by Josh Frydenberg and Mathias Cormann that helped deliver the “biggest fall in the deficit in Australia’s history of over $100bn”. Reflecting on the pandemic fallout after receiving a Companion of the Order of Australia in the King’s Birthday honours list, Mr Morrison said he opposed blanket vaccine mandates and school closures ordered by state and territory governments. Mr Morrison, whose AC was awarded for his leadership of the national Covid-19 response alongside achievements on the global stage including his role as co-architect of the AUKUS deal, remains convinced the national cabinet model he set up was the “right vehicle”. The former Liberal leader, who had running pandemic battles with premiers including Daniel Andrews, Annastacia Palaszczuk and Mark McGowan over lockdowns and border closures, said the bottom-up, bureaucracy-laden COAG (Council of Australian Governments) forum had become a place where policy issues “went to die”. “Vaccine mandates employed unilaterally by states were not decisions of the national cabinet. Decisions to close schools were not decisions of national cabinet. In fact, on both of those, I opposed them,” Mr Morrison told The Australian.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73615
>>73616
No regrets for Morrison on pandemic-era actions
GEOFF CHAMBERS - 9 June 2025
Scott Morrison has called out blanket vaccine mandates and school closures during the pandemic, defended his creation of the national cabinet and backed big-spending measures that ensured the nation’s economy “rocketed out the other side of Covid”.
The former prime minister, who does not regret his government’s call to not bank a surplus at the end of 2019, said hard decisions were made by Josh Frydenberg and Mathias Cormann that helped deliver the “biggest fall in the deficit in Australia’s history of over $100bn”.
Reflecting on the pandemic fallout after receiving a Companion of the Order of Australia in the King’s Birthday honours list, Mr Morrison said he opposed blanket vaccine mandates and school closures ordered by state and territory governments.
Mr Morrison, whose AC was awarded for his leadership of the national Covid-19 response alongside achievements on the global stage including his role as co-architect of the AUKUS deal, remains convinced the national cabinet model he set up was the “right vehicle”.
The former Liberal leader, who had running pandemic battles with premiers including Daniel Andrews, Annastacia Palaszczuk and Mark McGowan over lockdowns and border closures, said the bottom-up, bureaucracy-laden COAG (Council of Australian Governments) forum had become a place where policy issues “went to die”.
“Vaccine mandates employed unilaterally by states were not decisions of the national cabinet. Decisions to close schools were not decisions of national cabinet. In fact, on both of those, I opposed them,” Mr Morrison told The Australian.
“The only vaccine mandate I ever supported were ones that dealt with people in very vulnerable health situations.
“They were unilateral actions taken by states, and it’s for them to justify those decisions that were ascribed to some sort of consensus of national cabinet, which was never the case.
“Did all the decisions the states and territories make, were they all good ones?
“No one gets everything right, and some of them got less of it right than others.”
Mr Morrison, who before replacing Malcolm Turnbull as prime minister in August 2018 spent almost three years running the Treasury, revealed no regrets on Mr Frydenberg’s “back to balance” budget at a time when economists believed the Coalition could have recorded a small surplus.
After years of work to tighten expenditure and keep spending growth low, Mr Morrison, Mr Cormann, now OECD secretary-general in Paris, and Mr Frydenberg announced the budget was back in balance just months before Covid was detected in China.
With ratings agencies keeping a close watch on Australia’s triple-A credit rating during his time as treasurer, Mr Morrison said a “surplus of a billion or so above the mark or below, if the other way, is effectively the same result particularly from the perspective of ratings agencies”.
Mr Morrison, whose record spending on mental health was a hallmark of his time in office, said despite his government’s worst fears about the impacts of the pandemic on people’s wellbeing, the rate of death by suicide fell in 2020 and 2021.
On the unprecedented economic response, Mr Morrison said Australia’s approach to saving “lives and livelihoods” was world-leading.
“I remember being criticised for using the phrase ‘snap back on the economy’. But it is a pretty steep V. When we did the economic supports, with Josh and Mathias’ roles in that, JobKeeper was a very innovative policy, and there are many other measures … that rocketed us out of the other side of Covid in a way that I think even surprised us,” he said.
“But because we so carefully made sure the measures were temporary and targeted, when we switched them off, we had the biggest fall in the deficit in Australia’s history of over $100bn.”
Mr Morrison said the economic rebound, which is credited with helping Jim Chalmers to record back-to-back surpluses, was predicated on programs designed to be “temporary and targeted”.
“You turn it on, and then you have the discipline to turn it off.”
https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/no-regrets-for-morrison-on-pandemicera-actions/news-story/25dce22b65e016844ae3a83fac87e115
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73618
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23144540 (090259ZJUN25) Notable: US pressures Australia over ban on Israeli-American speaker Hillel Fuld - The Albanese government is facing diplomatic pressure from Washington after US ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee personally appealed to Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke to overturn a visa cancellation of Israeli-American tech advocate Hillel Fuld. The rare intervention came hours after The Australian revealed how the Department of Home Affairs quietly cancelled Mr Fuld’s travel visa and accused him of using social media to deny “documented atrocities” in Gaza, promote Islamophobic views and spread inflammatory content that could incite division amid heightened community tensions. In a lengthy email sent directly to Mr Burke, Mr Huckabee described Mr Fuld as a “highly respected” dual US-Israeli citizen who poses “no threat of any kind” to Australia and urged the minister to allow his visit for “the sake of the very important charity event” organised by Magen David Adom Australia. “Mr Fuld is highly respected member in his community and well known in Israel. While he holds strong views against terrorism and the kind of massacre that occurred on October 7, he would pose no threat to the people of Australia by his actions or words,” Mr Huckabee, governor of Arkansas from 1996 to 2007, wrote. “I fully respect the decision to grant the visa is solely in your hands and you have a sovereign right to make the decision to deny entry to someone you consider a threat to national security (but) I do not feel Mr Fuld poses any threat of any kind. I would respectfully request … you would be willing to review his visa application and grant the opportunity to make his brief visit for the sake of the very important charity event for the humanitarian emergency medical service organisation.”
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73612
US pressures Australia over ban on Israeli-American speaker Hillel Fuld
MOHAMMAD ALFARES - 8 June 2025
1/2
The Albanese government is facing diplomatic pressure from Washington after US ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee personally appealed to Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke to overturn a visa cancellation of Israeli-American tech advocate Hillel Fuld.
The rare intervention came hours after The Australian revealed how the Department of Home Affairs quietly cancelled Mr Fuld’s travel visa and accused him of using social media to deny “documented atrocities” in Gaza, promote Islamophobic views and spread inflammatory content that could incite division amid heightened community tensions.
In a lengthy email sent directly to Mr Burke, Mr Huckabee described Mr Fuld as a “highly respected” dual US-Israeli citizen who poses “no threat of any kind” to Australia and urged the minister to allow his visit for “the sake of the very important charity event” organised by Magen David Adom Australia.
“Mr Fuld is highly respected member in his community and well known in Israel. While he holds strong views against terrorism and the kind of massacre that occurred on October 7, he would pose no threat to the people of Australia by his actions or words,” Mr Huckabee, governor of Arkansas from 1996 to 2007, wrote.
“I fully respect the decision to grant the visa is solely in your hands and you have a sovereign right to make the decision to deny entry to someone you consider a threat to national security (but) I do not feel Mr Fuld poses any threat of any kind. I would respectfully request … you would be willing to review his visa application and grant the opportunity to make his brief visit for the sake of the very important charity event for the humanitarian emergency medical service organisation.”
The cancellation has sparked outrage among Jewish groups and prompted criticism from Coalition home affairs spokesman Andrew Hastie, who demanded answers from the Albanese government over what he described as a troubling precedent.
In a statement to The Australian, Mr Burke said the country did not want to import “hatred”.
“Australians have a strong view that we don’t want hatred from overseas brought here,” he said.
“This power has been used repeatedly over many years by ministers. It is currently being tested in the High Court in the Candace Owens matter. Last term, there was bipartisan support for the use of this power. If that is no longer the case, Mr Hastie should say so.”
It’s understood Mr Fuld insists on attending the scheduled events virtually if the visa decision is upheld.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73619
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23144688 (090323ZJUN25) Notable: Little penguins loom as a potential torpedo for AUKUS works - Little penguins could prove to be a big headache for Australia’s AUKUS program. Work on the key infrastructure needed to support the first Australia-based nuclear-powered submarines will be just one broken wing away from being forced to stop, at least temporarily, under conditions imposed on the project by Environment Minister Murray Watt. A single squashed skink would similarly bring work on the all-important upgrades at the HMAS Stirling naval base, on Garden Island off the coast of Rockingham in Western Australia, according to Senator Watt’s decision. Defence needs to carry out a series of upgrades and new installations at HMAS Stirling in preparation for the arrival in 2027 of the first submarines under AUKUS. The US and, later, British nuclear-powered submarines will be based out of HMAS Stirling as part of Submarine Rotational Force West as the program’s first major step. But the wildlife of Garden Island is proving a complicating factor. The main colony of little penguins on the island sits immediately southwest of HMAS Stirling’s main Diamantina pier in Careening Bay, while smaller colonies sit immediately northeast. All of them fall within the main “proposed action area” where the infrastructure upgrades will occur. The order requires Defence to “immediately initiate a stop-works procedure” in the event any little penguin, Perth slider (a type of skink) or marine mammal is found killed or injured in the area, under the Department of Climate Change, Energy, the Environment and Water’s conditions. Defence will also be responsible for arranging veterinary care or assistance “from an experienced wildlife carer” for any native terrestrial or marine animal” found injured. Among other conditions imposed on the work is a ban on dredging or disposing of spoil in Careening Bay during the little penguin’s breeding or moulting periods, “or as otherwise advised by a suitably qualified seabird conservation ecologist”.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73432
Little penguins loom as a potential torpedo for AUKUS works
PAUL GARVEY - 8 June 2025
1/2
Little penguins could prove to be a big headache for Australia’s AUKUS program.
Work on the key infrastructure needed to support the first Australia-based nuclear-powered submarines will be just one broken wing away from being forced to stop, at least temporarily, under conditions imposed on the project by Environment Minister Murray Watt.
A single squashed skink would similarly bring work on the all-important upgrades at the HMAS Stirling naval base, on Garden Island off the coast of Rockingham in Western Australia, according to Senator Watt’s decision.
Defence needs to carry out a series of upgrades and new installations at HMAS Stirling in preparation for the arrival in 2027 of the first submarines under AUKUS.
The US and, later, British nuclear-powered submarines will be based out of HMAS Stirling as part of Submarine Rotational Force West as the program’s first major step.
But the wildlife of Garden Island is proving a complicating factor. The main colony of little penguins on the island sits immediately southwest of HMAS Stirling’s main Diamantina pier in Careening Bay, while smaller colonies sit immediately northeast. All of them fall within the main “proposed action area” where the infrastructure upgrades will occur.
The order requires Defence to “immediately initiate a stop-works procedure” in the event any little penguin, Perth slider (a type of skink) or marine mammal is found killed or injured in the area, under the Department of Climate Change, Energy, the Environment and Water’s conditions. Defence will also be responsible for arranging veterinary care or assistance “from an experienced wildlife carer” for any native terrestrial or marine animal” found injured.
Among other conditions imposed on the work is a ban on dredging or disposing of spoil in Careening Bay during the little penguin’s breeding or moulting periods, “or as otherwise advised by a suitably qualified seabird conservation ecologist”.
Maritime works will be allowed to take place only between 30 minutes after sunrise and 30 minutes before sunset “to avoid harm to the little penguins during their arrival, departure and rafting periods”. Lighting from construction will have to be directed away from penguin nesting sites.
Defence will also need to implement a noise and vibration monitoring program – “prepared by a suitably qualified acoustic expert in consultation with a suitably qualified seabird conservation ecologist” – to ensure the audible disturbances during the works do not cause harm to the penguins and their nesting sites.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73620
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23144780 (090335ZJUN25) Notable: Former trade minister urges Anthony Albanese not to ‘concede’ to Donald Trump on tariffs - The architect of multiple landmark free-trade agreements has urged Anthony Albanese to focus on the nation’s shared history with the US in a potential meeting with Donald Trump, declaring there was no basis on which Australia should be “conceding or negotiating” on tariffs. Former trade minister Andrew Robb, who secured free-trade deals with China, Japan and South Korea, as well as the Trans-Pacific Partnership, said the Prime Minister needed to tell Mr Trump his decision to violate the agreement between the two countries without a phone call was “unacceptable”. As Trade Minister Don Farrell advances negotiations for a free-trade agreement with the EU, Mr Robb said striking a “good deal” with Europe would counter Mr Trump’s protectionist agenda and demonstrate to the US the benefits of opening the world economy. Mr Robb, trade minister from 2013-16, said the move to slap a 10 per cent baseline tariff on Australian exports to the US and 50 per cent on steel and aluminium was unjustifiable considering the two nations’ strong alliance and wartime history. “I find it intolerable that all these things that have been imposed on us have occurred without even a phone call,” Mr Robb told The Australian. “That’s what he should be saying to the President before those open discussions. We’ve got no need to negotiate on anything, we have been giving, and given to giving.”
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73550
>>73583
>>73611
Former trade minister urges Anthony Albanese not to ‘concede’ to Donald Trump on tariffs
RHIANNON DOWN - 9 June 2025
The architect of multiple landmark free-trade agreements has urged Anthony Albanese to focus on the nation’s shared history with the US in a potential meeting with Donald Trump, declaring there was no basis on which Australia should be “conceding or negotiating” on tariffs.
Former trade minister Andrew Robb, who secured free-trade deals with China, Japan and South Korea, as well as the Trans-Pacific Partnership, said the Prime Minister needed to tell Mr Trump his decision to violate the agreement between the two countries without a phone call was “unacceptable”.
As Trade Minister Don Farrell advances negotiations for a free-trade agreement with the EU, Mr Robb said striking a “good deal” with Europe would counter Mr Trump’s protectionist agenda and demonstrate to the US the benefits of opening the world economy.
Mr Robb, trade minister from 2013-16, said the move to slap a 10 per cent baseline tariff on Australian exports to the US and 50 per cent on steel and aluminium was unjustifiable considering the two nations’ strong alliance and wartime history.
“I find it intolerable that all these things that have been imposed on us have occurred without even a phone call,” Mr Robb told The Australian.
“That’s what he should be saying to the President before those open discussions.
“We’ve got no need to negotiate on anything, we have been giving, and given to giving.”
The former Liberal MP, who also negotiated the Comprehensive Strategic Partnership with Singapore, said there was “no reason” behind the tariffs.
Though Mr Trump has complained the US had a trade deficit with many countries and used that as justification, Australia has historically imported more goods from America than it had exported.
“You do not treat friends as we’ve been treated,” Mr Robb said.
“You don’t make friends into supplicants, and that’s what’s happening.
“Where the big does what it wants, and the smaller takes it in the neck.
“I think that point has to be made: there is, on no basis, any good reason why we should be conceding or negotiating.
“We have done nothing wrong.”
After the tariffs reinvigorated efforts to secure an agreement with the EU, Mr Robb said he hoped this time negotiators would be able to resolve issues concerning agricultural market access that had sunk past attempts.
“There’s no point doing a bad deal just to get a deal done,” he said.
“We have to demonstrate to the US that there is still significant opportunity and also significant benefit from further opening up of our economies.
“Both the Europeans and ourselves need to show that we can further open up our economies to one another.
“So that’s not … just doing a deal for the sake of doing a deal. It’s got to be a good deal.”
The negotiations on an EU trade deal come as Mr Albanese prepares for a potential meeting with Mr Trump on the sidelines of the G7 summit in Canada this week, when he is expected to raise the US’s request for Australia to lift its defence spending and a carve-out from tariffs.
Senator Farrell on Sunday signalled that an EU agreement was in reach, declaring there was a “mood around the world to push the case for less protectionism and more free and fair trade”.
“There was a lot of goodwill in the air in Paris last week,” he told Sky News.
“I’m confident that if that goodwill continues, that we can secure a new free-trade agreement with the EU.”
Senator Farrell said he was pursuing the total removal by the US of all tariffs, and criticised the trade barriers as having “no justification”.
Universities Australia has called on Senator Farrell to raise membership of EU-linked research fund Horizon Europe as part of negotiations, after the US paused and suspended funding for Australian research projects.
UA chief executive Luke Sheehy met with officials from the European Commission and Australia’s EU ambassador, Angus Campbell, in Brussels on Friday to discuss how the nation could join.
International Education Association of Australia chief executive Phil Honeywood said while it was important to progress research collaborations with Europe, the nation had to foster close ties with its regional partners in Asia.
“With any move to get close alignment with our European colleagues, we’ve got to be very careful we don’t throw the baby out with the bath water,” he said. “In terms of losing sight of the crucial involvement we have with Asia-Pacific institutions, and the fact that a large amount of our research output is dependent on students from Asian countries.”
https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/former-trade-minister-urges-anthony-albanese-not-to-concede-to-donald-trump-on-tariffs/news-story/1b7c8808fc841e2b88277dcfa71d27c2
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73621
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23145527 (090703ZJUN25) Notable: Child gender-medicine:Family Court judge critical of Michelle Telfer over gender guidelines, evidence- Australia’s foremost gender-medicine expert and the lead author of the nation’s guidelines on gender-affirming care, Michelle Telfer, was excoriated by a Family Court judge for giving misleading evidence in support of a mother who wanted her child to be prescribed puberty blockers, in a judgment that has called into question the integrity of treatment of gender-dysphoric children. Judge Andrew Strum, who stripped the mother of custody and effectively blocked the 12-year-old from accessing treatment, criticised the Royal Children’s Hospital Melbourne for failing to give the child a formal gender dysphoria diagnosis until the court proceedings had commenced, despite having treated the child for six years. The hospital’s chief of medicine, Professor Telfer, he said, cheapened the suffering of victims of Nazism when she suggested a landmark review that recommended limitations on medication for gender-dysphoric children formed part of a wave of transgender oppression commencing with the Nazis. Justice Strum also questioned the Australian Standards of Care and Treatment Guidelines for Trans and Gender Diverse Children and Adolescents, authored by Professor Telfer, for not recognising children may not be capable of making life-altering medical decisions about their gender identity. The judgment, published in April, anonymised Professor Telfer as Associate Professor L and did not name the Royal Children’s Hospital due to statutory prohibitions preventing the identification of witnesses in Family Court proceedings. However, The Australian was on Thursday successful in petitioning the court to name Professor Telfer and her place of work, arguing it was in the public interest for the practices of an expert healthcare professional and a pre-eminent medical service to be transparent. “Nationwide News submits, and I agree, that the interests of the public are best served by members of the public having access to the entire context of Associate Professor L’s opinion or practice, so that it can be properly assessed,” Justice Strum ruled in approving the application. “Such transparency, including as to that expert’s identity, enables individuals to evaluate critically the validity, reliability and implications of that opinion and practice.” Justice Strum also agreed with The Australian’s submission that revealing Professor Telfer’s identity would assist parents, caregivers and their children in making informed decisions about their health.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>51073 (pb)
>>51074 (pb)
>>51075 (pb)
Child gender-medicine: Judge critical of Michelle Telfer over gender guidelines, evidence
ELLIE DUDLEY - June 05, 2025
1/3
Australia’s foremost gender-medicine expert and the lead author of the nation’s guidelines on gender-affirming care, Michelle Telfer, was excoriated by a Family Court judge for giving misleading evidence in support of a mother who wanted her child to be prescribed puberty blockers, in a judgment that has called into question the integrity of treatment of gender-dysphoric children.
Judge Andrew Strum, who stripped the mother of custody and effectively blocked the 12-year-old from accessing treatment, criticised the Royal Children’s Hospital Melbourne for failing to give the child a formal gender dysphoria diagnosis until the court proceedings had commenced, despite having treated the child for six years.
The hospital’s chief of medicine, Professor Telfer, he said, cheapened the suffering of victims of Nazism when she suggested a landmark review that recommended limitations on medication for gender-dysphoric children formed part of a wave of transgender oppression commencing with the Nazis.
Justice Strum also questioned the Australian Standards of Care and Treatment Guidelines for Trans and Gender Diverse Children and Adolescents, authored by Professor Telfer, for not recognising children may not be capable of making life-altering medical decisions about their gender identity.
“It is concerning that an oddly binary approach is adopted in relation to children, especially of the age of the child the subject of these proceedings; that is, to affirm unreservedly those who present with concerns regarding their gender, brooking no questioning thereof,” he wrote in the judgment.
“The case of the mother … is that because the child says so, the child is, and must unquestioningly be affirmed as being, female in gender identity. However, that overlooks the obvious, namely, that the child is still a child and not even, if it matters, a teenager.”
The judgment, published in April, anonymised Professor Telfer as Associate Professor L and did not name the Royal Children’s Hospital due to statutory prohibitions preventing the identification of witnesses in Family Court proceedings. However, The Australian was on Thursday successful in petitioning the court to name Professor Telfer and her place of work, arguing it was in the public interest for the practices of an expert healthcare professional and a pre-eminent medical service to be transparent.
“Nationwide News submits, and I agree, that the interests of the public are best served by members of the public having access to the entire context of Associate Professor L’s opinion or practice, so that it can be properly assessed,” Justice Strum ruled in approving the application. “Such transparency, including as to that expert’s identity, enables individuals to evaluate critically the validity, reliability and implications of that opinion and practice.”
He said maintaining confidentiality over Professor Telfer’s identity “may well undermine public confidence in the administration of justice”.
“In the context of applications for suppression or non-publication orders, it is often acknowledged that the proper functioning of the justice system is strengthened by openness to public and professional scrutiny,” he said.
“Transparency serves as a safeguard against potential misuse of judicial power, ensuring that justice is not only done but seen to be done, and reducing the risk that abuses go unnoticed or unaddressed.”
Justice Strum also agreed with The Australian’s submission that revealing Professor Telfer’s identity would assist parents, caregivers and their children in making informed decisions about their health.
“There is a diversity of views, both within and outside of Australia, as to what is appropriate or best-practice healthcare for transgender or gender diverse children and adolescents, with limited evidence about the long-term effects of some of the healthcare options promoted by Associate Professor L, the Children’s Hospital and its Gender Service,” he said.
He said the evidence of Professor Telfer was an area of “legitimate public comment, public discussion and public inquiry”.
A statement released by the Royal Children’s Hospital Melbourne said its gender service delivered a “world-leading, multi-disciplinary model of care” which supported the mental health and wellbeing of young Australians.
Some experts said Justice Strum’s comments marked the first time someone in high authority had had “the courage to say what is true”, and called on the federal government to better interrogate national frameworks for gender medicine.
While Justice Strum did not offer general comment on the treatment model adopted by RCH, he said the impact of that model on a child was of relevance.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73622
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23145583 (090744ZJUN25) Notable: ‘Public interest’: gender clinic’s practices should be open to scrutiny, judge rules - Michelle Telfer was a young paediatrician at The Royal Children’s Hospital Melbourne in 2012 when she was asked to make what would become a life-changing decision. A colleague heading into retirement approached her to take on his small number of young transgender patients requiring support for medical transition. It was a tempting offer to work in this developing branch of medicine. “I really didn’t have much experience working with trans and gender diverse young people. I didn’t have any actually,’’ Telfer, a Perth-born former Olympic gymnast and Commonwealth Games medallist, told the Emerging Minds podcast in 2019. “But when I started to meet these young people, I really enjoyed it and really felt that it was a worthwhile area to assist in.” Back in 2012, the service received just 18 referrals and Telfer was advised these patients would be a small part of her clinical practice. How wrong that prediction would prove. Each year since 2012, referrals have rapidly grown (to 473 by 2020) and the cause of trans and gender diverse young people has “actually taken over my life’’, Telfer, now one of Australia’s foremost child gender medicine experts, told The Lancet Child and Adolescent Health. She was instrumental in establishing the hospital’s gender service - the country’s first multidisciplinary clinic for children and young people, which has been lauded internationally – and played a key role in developing Australian clinical guidelines for trans and gender diverse young people. Those say children should drive decision-making around medical intervention and doing nothing, or withholding gender affirming care, was not a neutral option and may increase depression, anxiety and suicidality. Now Family Court judge Andrew Strum has heard testimony from Associate Professor Telfer and other experts. He has agreed she and the hospital should be identified by name. Justice Strum said airing of the entire context of Telfer’s opinion or practice would enable “individuals to evaluate critically the validity, reliability and implications of that opinion and practice.”
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73621
‘Public interest’: gender clinic’s practices should be open to scrutiny, judge rules
Michelle Telfer and a Melbourne gender service were lauded for their ‘lifesaving work’ with trans kids. But a Family Court justice has raised concerns about the practice of gender affirming care.
CHRISTINE MIDDAP - June 05, 2025
1/4
Michelle Telfer was a young paediatrician at The Royal Children’s Hospital Melbourne in 2012 when she was asked to make what would become a life-changing decision.
A colleague heading into retirement approached her to take on his small number of young transgender patients requiring support for medical transition. It was a tempting offer to work in this developing branch of medicine. “I really didn’t have much experience working with trans and gender diverse young people. I didn’t have any actually,’’ Telfer, a Perth-born former Olympic gymnast and Commonwealth Games medallist, told the Emerging Minds podcast in 2019.
“But when I started to meet these young people, I really enjoyed it and really felt that it was a worthwhile area to assist in.”
Back in 2012, the service received just 18 referrals and Telfer was advised these patients would be a small part of her clinical practice. How wrong that prediction would prove.
Each year since 2012, referrals have rapidly grown (to 473 by 2020) and the cause of trans and gender diverse young people has “actually taken over my life’’, Telfer, now one of Australia’s foremost child gender medicine experts, told The Lancet Child and Adolescent Health.
She was instrumental in establishing the hospital’s gender service – the country’s first multidisciplinary clinic for children and young people, which has been lauded internationally – and played a key role in developing Australian clinical guidelines for trans and gender diverse young people.
Those say children should drive decision-making around medical intervention and doing nothing, or withholding gender affirming care, was not a neutral option and may increase depression, anxiety and suicidality.
In The Lancet profile, Telfer spoke of the impact of her work: “You feel you are genuinely helping someone and changing the trajectory of their life just by acknowledging how they feel and empowering them to be that person”.
Stigma and abuse
Telfer’s advocacy led to young people gaining access to hormone and surgical treatment without approval from the Family Court and as her profile soared, she was hailed as a lifesaving advocate for trans youth and profiled on the ABC’s Australian Story and on the cover of Nine’s Good Weekend magazine.
In those stories, her work and courage were supported by a number of patients, their families, colleagues and the Victorian government, and any questions or criticism around the direction of child gender affirming treatment were largely downplayed.
Many journalists and other interested parties understood questioning the guidelines inevitably led to accusations that they were exacerbating the stigma and abuse directed towards the transgender community and worsening mental health outcomes for vulnerable people.
Now Family Court judge Andrew Strum has heard testimony from Associate Professor Telfer and other experts.
He has agreed she and the hospital should be identified by name.
Justice Strum said airing of the entire context of Telfer’s opinion or practice would enable “individuals to evaluate critically the validity, reliability and implications of that opinion and practice … The mere fact it may be the subject of ongoing controversy and debate does not detract from the public interest in it being made public.”
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73623
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23145597 (090816ZJUN25) Notable: COMMENTARY: Doctor’s advocacy trumped duty to objectivity in court - "Medicalised gender change for distressed minors, driven by puberty blockers and cross-sex hormones, is experimental treatment. Since 2019, jurisdictions as different as Finland, Florida, Sweden and England have independently put these hormonal treatments to the gold-standard test; in each case, systematic reviews of the evidence have shown it to be very weak and uncertain. So, there is no good-quality evidence to claim that paediatric medical transition benefits mental health, let alone prevents suicide. The known risks include brittle bones, cardiovascular problems, loss of fertility, sexual dysfunction and potential harm to the brain. And yet children’s hospitals and clinics across Australia continue to promote “gender-affirming care” as lifesaving. How was this allowed to happen? The public deserve an answer. We know this treatment was introduced as routine, bypassing the safeguard of clinical trials. The innovator was the gender clinic of the Royal Children’s Hospital Melbourne, which launched radical treatment guidelines in 2018. Misleadingly badged as “Australian standards”, these low-quality guidelines have nonetheless become the de facto national blueprint for gender clinicians. There are serious questions whether normal governance processes were followed at RCH - or at myriad other institutions that proudly stated their adherence to the guidelines. Until recently, it was hard to find a single Family Court case in which the judges had decided a child was simply incapable of consenting to puberty blockers, cross-sex hormones or a double mastectomy. And then, in April, the court handed down its ruling in re Devin, ordering that this 12-year-old boy be protected from puberty blockers at an unnamed children’s hospital gender service. Justice Andrew Strum’s decision in re Devin is the first detailed analysis by an Australian court of the fundamental flaws of the gender-affirming medical model. He was sharply critical of the doctor anonymised as “Associate Professor L”, who described herself as “an advocate for trans rights”. It is not a personal attack to name Dr Telfer or examine her role. In 2020, RCH claimed The Australian’s coverage of the issues was “targeted, personal, inflammatory and unprecedented,” but could not provide a single example. For some years, Dr Telfer courted uncritical media publicity. She was named in the celebratory re Kelvin ruling. She has been the central figure in the institution of gender-affirming care in Australia. When The Australian began its scrutiny of RCH, Dr Telfer was director of the country’s most influential gender clinic, first author of the de facto national guidelines and president of the activist Australian Professional Association for Trans Health; a recipe for conflicts of interest. Dr Telfer is still at RCH, as chief of medicine, and is still promoted on the gender clinic website. Just as she accepted plaudits in the past, she must be held accountable now." - Bernard Lane, writer of Gender Clinic News - theaustralian.com.au
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73621
>>73622
Doctor’s advocacy trumped duty to objectivity in court
The public should know why gender-affirming care became the dominant practice in Australia without good quality evidence to support it.
BERNARD LANE - June 05, 2025
1/2
Medicalised gender change for distressed minors, driven by puberty blockers and cross-sex hormones, is experimental treatment. Since 2019, jurisdictions as different as Finland, Florida, Sweden and England have independently put these hormonal treatments to the gold-standard test; in each case, systematic reviews of the evidence have shown it to be very weak and uncertain.
So, there is no good-quality evidence to claim that paediatric medical transition benefits mental health, let alone prevents suicide. The known risks include brittle bones, cardiovascular problems, loss of fertility, sexual dysfunction and potential harm to the brain. And yet children’s hospitals and clinics across Australia continue to promote “gender-affirming care” as lifesaving. How was this allowed to happen? The public deserve an answer.
We know this treatment was introduced as routine, bypassing the safeguard of clinical trials. The innovator was the gender clinic of the Royal Children’s Hospital Melbourne, which launched radical treatment guidelines in 2018. Misleadingly badged as “Australian standards”, these low-quality guidelines have nonetheless become the de facto national blueprint for gender clinicians. There are serious questions whether normal governance processes were followed at RCH — or at myriad other institutions that proudly stated their adherence to the guidelines.
Journalists, judges and dodgy suicide statistics helped speed the adoption of this treatment model. Many media outlets, especially the ABC, showcased gender clinics as a human rights cause, failing to scrutinise the “affirmative” approach for coherence or evidence. In the famous 2017 case re Kelvin, the Family Court gave its imprimatur to the incorrect claim by RCH that “advances in medical science” meant the judges could safely wind back their supervision of treatment decisions for minors.
Until recently, it was hard to find a single Family Court case in which the judges had decided a child was simply incapable of consenting to puberty blockers, cross-sex hormones or a double mastectomy. And then, in April, the court handed down its ruling in re Devin, ordering that this 12-year-old boy be protected from puberty blockers at an unnamed children’s hospital gender service. Justice Andrew Strum’s decision in re Devin is the first detailed analysis by an Australian court of the fundamental flaws of the gender-affirming medical model. He was sharply critical of the doctor anonymised as “Associate Professor L”, who described herself as “an advocate for trans rights”.
Today, the judge agreed with lawyers for The Australian that lifting the cloak of anonymity would serve the public interest. Associate Professor L is paediatrican Michelle Telfer and the gender service caught up in the case is the pride of RCH. Parents contemplating a visit to this Melbourne clinic — or any members of the public troubled by an unfolding medical scandal — are entitled to know the target of Justice Strum’s criticism.
His account, informed by expert witnesses and case notes, is that RCH did not carry out the kind of comprehensive assessment that might have detected autism in Devin, failed to make a diagnosis of gender dysphoria until the eve of the court trial, and its only treatment was a single medical pathway beginning with puberty blockers — contrary to all its public relations rhetoric about multidisciplinary care.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73624
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23145628 (090851ZJUN25) Notable: ‘Vital’ to know who makes the calls on gender treatment: ex-judge - A former Family Court judge says it is “absolutely vital” jurists follow the example of judge Andrew Strum in making public the names of institutions treating gender dysphoric children, adding that it is critical parents are aware of the range of opinions on the efficacy of treatment. Stuart Lindsay, who presided in the Family Court from 2004-2014, praised Justice Strum’s ruling making public the identity of eminent gender-medicine expert and Royal Children’s Hospital Melbourne chief of medicine Michelle Telfer, whom he had criticised for giving misleading evidence in support of a mother who wanted her child to be prescribed puberty blockers. Justice Strum, in his judgment, had also questioned the Australian Standards of Care and Treatment Guidelines for Trans and Gender Diverse Children and Adolescents, authored by Professor Telfer, for not recognising children may not be capable of making life-altering medical decisions about their gender identity. “These are cases that involve a highly controversial area of medicine and one that specifically impacts upon children, and one that a lot of practitioners in the area of medicine involved say if it’s not properly scrutinised is capable of doing great harm to children at a particularly vulnerable part of their lives,” Mr Lindsay told The Australian. “So it’s absolutely essential that people involved in making decisions or in giving advice to parents about appropriate therapy for children who might be experiencing gender dysphoria are aware of the range of opinions in relation to the efficacy of the treatment, and especially the dangers of the treatment.”
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73621
>>73622
>>73623
‘Vital’ to know who makes the calls on gender treatment: ex-judge
ELLIE DUDLEY - June 06, 2025
1/2
A former Family Court judge says it is “absolutely vital” jurists follow the example of judge Andrew Strum in making public the names of institutions treating gender dysphoric children, adding that it is critical parents are aware of the range of opinions on the efficacy of treatment.
Stuart Lindsay, who presided in the Family Court from 2004-2014, praised Justice Strum’s ruling making public the identity of eminent gender-medicine expert and Royal Children’s Hospital Melbourne chief of medicine Michelle Telfer, whom he had criticised for giving misleading evidence in support of a mother who wanted her child to be prescribed puberty blockers.
Justice Strum, in his judgment, had also questioned the Australian Standards of Care and Treatment Guidelines for Trans and Gender Diverse Children and Adolescents, authored by Professor Telfer, for not recognising children may not be capable of making life-altering medical decisions about their gender identity.
“These are cases that involve a highly controversial area of medicine and one that specifically impacts upon children, and one that a lot of practitioners in the area of medicine involved say if it’s not properly scrutinised is capable of doing great harm to children at a particularly vulnerable part of their lives,” Mr Lindsay told The Australian.
“So it’s absolutely essential that people involved in making decisions or in giving advice to parents about appropriate therapy for children who might be experiencing gender dysphoria are aware of the range of opinions in relation to the efficacy of the treatment, and especially the dangers of the treatment.”
Justice Strum’s judgment, published in April, initially anonymised Professor Telfer as Associate Professor L and did not name the Royal Children’s Hospital due to statutory prohibitions preventing the identification of witnesses in Family Court proceedings.
However, The Australian was on Thursday successful in petitioning the court to name Professor Telfer and her place of work, arguing it was in the public interest for the practices of an expert healthcare professional and a pre-eminent medical service to be transparent.
Justice Strum, in approving The Australian’s application, said the “public are best served by members of the public having access to the entire context of Associate Professor L’s opinion or practice, so that it can be properly assessed”.
He also said revealing her identity would promote the administration of justice and assist parents, caregivers and their children in making informed decisions.
“There is a diversity of views, both within and outside of Australia, as to what is appropriate or best-practice healthcare for transgender or gender diverse children and adolescents, with limited evidence about the long-term effects of some of the healthcare options promoted by Associate Professor L, the Children’s Hospital and its Gender Service,” he said.
Mr Lindsay said the reasons Justice Strum gave for revealing the identity of a pre-eminent child gender medicine expert in a judgment in which he was critical of her practice would “maintain in almost every case of this nature”.
“All of those matters about open justice and about welfare of children and about, you know, negating all the risks that are attended upon secrecy of judicial proceedings,” Mr Lindsay, a former Liberal Party member, said. “They’re all going to maintain in similar cases.”
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73625
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23145659 (090944ZJUN25) Notable: Video: ‘Must be called out’: PM under pressure after 9News reporter Lauren Tomasi shot with rubber bullet during LA protests - The Greens have called on Prime Minister Anthony Albanese to seek “urgent explanation” from Donald Trump after an Australian journalist was shot by police with a rubber bullet in Los Angeles. 9News reporter Lauren Tomasi was hit while covering street protests that have broken out in LA following the arrests of dozens of people for alleged immigration violations. The moment was captured on camera with Ms Tomasi directly hit in the leg. “You just f*ckin’ shot the reporter!” a protester yelled at the officer before asking whether she was OK. “Yeah, I’m good,” she replied. Providing an update on 9News on Monday evening, Ms Tomasi said, “I’m okay. My cameraman Jimmy and I are both safe. “This is just one of the unfortunate realities of reporting on these kinds of incidents. It has been a really volatile day on the streets of Los Angeles. There have been a lot of tempers flaring here today and certainly tonight there is a lot of anger in the City of Angels.” In a statement, Greens Senator Sarah Hanson-Young called on Mr Albanese to hold the US President accountable. “US authorities shooting an Australian journalist is simply shocking,” Ms Hanson-Young said in a statement. “It is completely unacceptable and must be called out.”
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73583
‘Must be called out’: PM under pressure after 9News reporter Lauren Tomasi shot with rubber bullet during LA protests
Anthony Albanese is being urged to confront US President Donald Trump after an Aussie journo was shot with a rubber bullet while covering the LA riots.
Sarah Keoghan - June 9, 2025
The Greens have called on Prime Minister Anthony Albanese to seek “urgent explanation” from Donald Trump after an Australian journalist was shot by police with a rubber bullet in Los Angeles.
9News reporter Lauren Tomasi was hit while covering street protests that have broken out in LA following the arrests of dozens of people for alleged immigration violations.
The moment was captured on camera with Ms Tomasi directly hit in the leg.
“You just f*ckin’ shot the reporter!” a protester yelled at the officer before asking whether she was OK.
“Yeah, I’m good,” she replied.
Providing an update on 9News on Monday evening, Ms Tomasi said, “I’m okay. My cameraman Jimmy and I are both safe.
“This is just one of the unfortunate realities of reporting on these kinds of incidents. It has been a really volatile day on the streets of Los Angeles.
“There have been a lot of tempers flaring here today and certainly tonight there is a lot of anger in the City of Angels.”
In a statement, Greens Senator Sarah Hanson-Young called on Mr Albanese to hold the US President accountable.
“US authorities shooting an Australian journalist is simply shocking,” Ms Hanson-Young said in a statement.
“It is completely unacceptable and must be called out.”
Ms Hanson-Young, who is also the Greens spokeswoman for media and communication, said the Prime Minister should seek “an urgent explanation from the US administration”.
“As Albanese is preparing for his first meeting with President Trump, the first thing he must tell the President is to stop shooting at our journalists,” Ms Hanson-Young.
“Freedom of the press is a fundamental pillar of a strong, functioning democracy.”
In a statement, Channel 9 said both Ms Tomasi and their camera operator were “safe”.
“While reporting from protests in Los Angeles, 9News reporter Lauren Tomasi was struck by a rubber bullet. Lauren and her camera operator are safe and will continue their essential work covering these events,” the media company said.
“This incident serves as a stark reminder of the inherent dangers journalists can face while reporting from the frontlines of protests, underscoring the importance of their role in providing vital information.”
On X, Ms Tomasi told a follower she was “safe and okay”.
In a statement, the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade said the Australian Consulate-General in Los Angeles was in contact with Ms Tomasi.
“Australia supports media freedom and the protection of journalists. All journalists should be able to do their work safely,” the statement said.
The PM is yet to comment on the incident.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73626
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23152313 (100902ZJUN25) Notable: Video: Hate-spewing preacher Wissam Haddad’s sword post ahead of court battle with Jewish leaders - Hate preacher Wissam Haddad has ramped up threats on the eve of his legal battle against Australia’s peak Jewish body, warning in a video “we are not going to come unarmed, we’re going to fight them with everything that we have,” followed by the image of a sword. The video has been condemned by Jewish community members who believe it is an incitement to young radicals to commit violence, with Mr Haddad set to appear in the Federal Court on Tuesday to defend claims that he breached vilification laws over his sermons asserting Jews are “vile” and “treacherous” people. The provocative post comes as radical American Islamist Sheik Ahmad Musa Jibril exhorts his followers around the world to help fund Mr Haddad’s defence, with a radical Salafi account linked to Sheik Jibril claiming the Sydney-based cleric is “one of the most targeted men in Australia by the disbelievers”. Mr Haddad, also known as Abu Ousayd, is being sued by the Executive Council of Australian Jewry over allegations that he breached the Racial Discrimination Act through his sermons in the wake of the Hamas October 7, 2023 attacks on Israel. Mr Haddad or speakers at his Bankstown-based Al Madina Dawah Centre have called Jewish people “descendants of pigs and monkeys”, recited parables about their killing, and said people should “spit” on Israel so its citizens “would drown”.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73554
Hate-spewing preacher Wissam Haddad’s sword post ahead of court battle with Jewish leaders
STEPHEN RICE - 9 June 2025
1/2
Hate preacher Wissam Haddad has ramped up threats on the eve of his legal battle against Australia’s peak Jewish body, warning in a video “we are not going to come unarmed, we’re going to fight them with everything that we have,” followed by the image of a sword.
The video has been condemned by Jewish community members who believe it is an incitement to young radicals to commit violence, with Mr Haddad set to appear in the Federal Court on Tuesday to defend claims that he breached vilification laws over his sermons asserting Jews are “vile” and “treacherous” people.
The provocative post comes as radical American Islamist Sheik Ahmad Musa Jibril exhorts his followers around the world to help fund Mr Haddad’s defence, with a radical Salafi account linked to Sheik Jibril claiming the Sydney-based cleric is “one of the most targeted men in Australia by the disbelievers”.
Mr Haddad, also known as Abu Ousayd, is being sued by the Executive Council of Australian Jewry over allegations that he breached the Racial Discrimination Act through his sermons in the wake of the Hamas October 7, 2023 attacks on Israel.
Mr Haddad or speakers at his Bankstown-based Al Madina Dawah Centre have called Jewish people “descendants of pigs and monkeys”, recited parables about their killing, and said people should “spit” on Israel so its citizens “would drown”.
In most cases, Mr Haddad has claimed that he was referring to or reciting Islamic scripture.
In a new video, Mr Haddad declares that he has “no problem facing the Jewish lobby … but they are the ones dragging us to court. So we’re not going to come unarmed. We’re going to fight them with everything that we have.”
At that point the image of a sword appears on screen and Mr Haddad continues: “But if this fighting means that it brings some sort of strength to the Muslim community, and it teaches a Muslim community that we should no longer be bullied.”
The image of the sword is then replaced with a raised fist.
“Isn’t it about time that somebody fights back? Isn’t it about time that somebody stands up to these bullies?
“And this is Alhamdulillah (praise be to God) something that I’m personally willing to do.”
The sermon appears to be one Mr Haddad delivered last month but the violent imagery has been newly added.
A Jewish community source told The Australian it was his view that Mr Haddad’s use of a sword was summoning his followers to join in a fight – “not a battle of ideas, but a physical battle”.
“He’s positioning it as an act of Islamic duty, a religious war between Muslims and Jews, which makes it even more alarming and chilling. He doesn’t have mainstream support in his own community, but it has the potential to incite young radicals to commit violence. It’s extremely dangerous.”
Mr Haddad’s GoFundMe campaign has raised more than $18,000 although it is still short of its $25,000 target.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73627
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23152324 (100913ZJUN25) Notable: Video: Jihadi preacher’s sermons ‘comfort to Muslim congregants’, court hears - Lawyers for Jihadi preacher Wissam Haddad have argued his sermons were given to provide private “comfort” to Muslim congregants, despite accusations he was in active dialogue with reporters as a self-proclaimed “masjid (mosque) shock jock”. Mr Haddad, whose first name is William but who is also known as Abu Ousayd, arrived at court on Tuesday ahead of his racial discrimination hearing, avoiding questions and surrounded by his legal team, as he stares down a four-day trial over allegations by the Executive Council of Australian Jewry that he breached the Racial Discrimination Act through his sermons in the wake of the Hamas October 7, 2023 attacks on Israel. Mr Haddad or speakers at his Al-Madina Dawah Centre have called Jewish people “descendants of pigs and monkeys”, recited parables about their killing and said people should “spit” on Israel so its citizens “would drown”. In most cases, he has claimed he was referring to or reciting Islamic scripture.Mr Haddad’s representative, Andrew Boe suggested Mr Haddad throughout his sermons addressed only historical Jewish tribes referenced in the Koran or the state of Israel and the influential figures within it, not the global Jewish diaspora.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73554
>>73626
Jihadi preacher’s sermons ‘comfort to Muslim congregants’, court hears
JAMES DOWLING - 10 June 2025
1/2
Lawyers for Jihadi preacher Wissam Haddad have argued his sermons were given to provide private “comfort” to Muslim congregants, despite accusations he was in active dialogue with reporters as a self-proclaimed “masjid (mosque) shock jock”.
Mr Haddad, whose first name is William but who is also known as Abu Ousayd, arrived at court on Tuesday ahead of his racial discrimination hearing, avoiding questions and surrounded by his legal team, as he stares down a four-day trial over allegations by the Executive Council of Australian Jewry that he breached the Racial Discrimination Act through his sermons in the wake of the Hamas October 7, 2023 attacks on Israel.
Mr Haddad or speakers at his Al-Madina Dawah Centre have called Jewish people “descendants of pigs and monkeys”, recited parables about their killing and said people should “spit” on Israel so its citizens “would drown”.
In most cases, he has claimed he was referring to or reciting Islamic scripture. He sat in the front row of the Federal Court and did not rise or bow to Judge Angus Stewart as proceedings began or were adjourned.
The ECAJ, with ECAJ co-chief executive Peter Wertheim as the primary applicant, first launched court action against Mr Haddad and his Bankstown-based Al-Madina Dawah Centre in October after a failed mediation process in the Human Rights Commission.
In a provocative video posted before the hearing Mr Haddad stated that “we are not going to come (to the trial) unarmed, we’re going to fight them with everything that we have”, followed by the image of a sword.
Peter Braham, representing Mr Wertheim and deputy president Robert Goot SC, said Mr Haddad’s behaviour had “the effect of normalising anti-Semitic prejudices and the expression of them, and (could) encourage acts of violence against Jewish people”.
“He makes no distinction between Jews who support Israel today and Jews who don’t. As we will see, in fact, the speeches were just speeches about Jews, ascribing to Jewish people certain negative characteristics, and encouraging his audience to hold those views,” he said.
“The intent of the speeches was to persuade an audience that the Jewish people had certain immutable and eternal characteristics that caused them to come into conflict with Muslims.”
Mr Haddad’s representative Andrew Boe suggested a judgment against Mr Haddad would unjustly limit freedom of speech and the “boundaries of legitimate debate cannot be set so narrowly as to exclude that which is not polite, bland, (or) muted”.
“It cannot be … that Section 18C (of the Racial Discrimination Act) can be contravened because some people in a group have gone out of their way to expose themselves to speech which they might reasonably expect to be critical of Israel,” Mr Boe said.
“It would be analogous to a person with a prudish sensitivity seeking out pornography on the web and then complaining about being offended by it.
“Mr Haddad’s evidence will be his motivation was to respond to expressions of great distress … by providing historical and religious context on those events in an attempt to provide spiritual comfort to them. That motivation is entirely consistent with the content of the speeches.”
He argued Mr Haddad throughout his sermons addressed only historical Jewish tribes referenced in the Koran or the state of Israel and the influential figures within it, not the global Jewish diaspora.
Mr Braham disputed this purported intention, and said Mr Haddad knowingly entered a public dialogue with journalists who reported on his sermons, including citing articles by this masthead.
“Mr Haddad read these newspaper articles, and as you see in his speech, he responds to them … and he says, ‘Hey, journalists, get your microphones ready, I’ve got more,’” Mr Braham said.
He pointed to extracts from Mr Haddad’s speeches.
“Today, I’m going to be a masjid (mosque) shock jock, and I want to rub salt in the wound so on Monday they have something to report about,” Mr Haddad said in a speech played before the court.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73628
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23152367 (100938ZJUN25) Notable: Video: Imam Samir Mohtadi’s hate speech from pulpit - A high-profile Victorian Muslim leader who branded Zionists as “scavengers” and “bloodsucking humans” has declared that Australia is waging a war on Islam, as he plans to build a multimillion-dollar Islamic “sanctuary” north of Melbourne. Sheik Abu Hamza, also known as Samir Mohtadi, is spearheading a $6.9m religious development in the fast-growing suburb of Mickleham, where he aims to establish an Islamic facility to cater for the city’s burgeoning Muslim population. But while fundraising millions through his registered charity, the Islamic Information and Services Network of Australasia, Sheik Mohtadi has also launched inflammatory public attacks on Zionists, Australian politicians, the “West” and secular institutions. In a hate-fuelled sermon delivered at the Australian Bosnian Islamic Centre in Melbourne’s west last week, which was attended by The Australian, the prominent imam prayed for victory for “our mujahideen (fighters) in Palestine” and called on Allah to “cast terror into the hearts of the Zionists”. Sheik Mohtadi’s sermon then turned to Australia itself, as he accused the federal government and institutions of waging an ideological “war of no God”. He preached to worshippers that they were not obliged to adopt the values of the country that had hosted them, granted them citizenship, and provided them full political, social, and economic rights - including the freedom of religion. He declared that as long as they had their own values, culture, language, and religion, they did not need to embrace Australia’s.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73553
>>73554
>>73626
Imam Samir Mohtadi’s hate speech from pulpit
MOHAMMAD ALFARES - June 09, 2025
1/2
A high-profile Victorian Muslim leader who branded Zionists as “scavengers” and “bloodsucking humans” has declared that Australia is waging a war on Islam, as he plans to build a multimillion-dollar Islamic “sanctuary” north of Melbourne.
Sheik Abu Hamza, also known as Samir Mohtadi, is spearheading a $6.9m religious development in the fast-growing suburb of Mickleham, where he aims to establish an Islamic facility to cater for the city’s burgeoning Muslim population.
But while fundraising millions through his registered charity, the Islamic Information and Services Network of Australasia, Sheik Mohtadi has also launched inflammatory public attacks on Zionists, Australian politicians, the “West” and secular institutions.
In a hate-fuelled sermon delivered at the Australian Bosnian Islamic Centre in Melbourne’s west last week, which was attended by The Australian, the prominent imam prayed for victory for “our mujahideen (fighters) in Palestine” and called on Allah to “cast terror into the hearts of the Zionists”.
“Oh Allah, grant victory to our mujahideen in Palestine, strengthen their feet, and grant them a clear triumph,” he said in Arabic.
“Oh Allah, cast terror into the hearts of the Zionists and shake the ground beneath their feet.
“Oh Allah, take away from them the blessing of security, scatter their gatherings, and tear apart their unity.”
Sheik Mohtadi’s sermon then turned to Australia itself, as he accused the federal government and institutions of waging an ideological “war of no God”.
He preached to worshippers that they were not obliged to adopt the values of the country that had hosted them, granted them citizenship, and provided them full political, social, and economic rights – including the freedom of religion. He declared that as long as they had their own values, culture, language, and religion, they did not need to embrace Australia’s.
“There’s a war at the moment that exists in this country which is much more dangerous than the war in Gaza,” he said.
“Within this country, we need to understand that the war that exists here, which is much more dangerous (than the war in Gaza), is the war of no God.
“They want to instil in our minds that God does not exist. So this is a war of intellect … They want to convey this message through organisations, through governments, so me and you doubt Allah.
“They want us to doubt Allah, to doubt the Day of Judgment, to doubt the prophet.”
The hardline imam also lamented the removal of religious practices from local council meetings and said secularism was leading Australians into a moral collapse.
“Here in councils, at one stage, they used to begin the meeting with a prayer … now they don’t want this to happen. So they want to distance Allah away from our lives, and that’s why the majority of people (in the West) are in a state of loss.”
Sheik Mohtadi’s radical commentary comes as he leads efforts to build a mega Islamic facility, dubbed a “sanctuary”, on a 12-hectare (30-acre) site in Mickleham, complete with a mosque, Islamic schools, aged care and sports facilities, as well as a youth services hub.
So far, his charity has raised $4.8m of the $6.9m goal, with appeals urging “1000 believers” to donate $3500 each “for the sake of Allah”.
“Plant the seeds that grow for generations to come,” IISNA said in its online fundraising pitch.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73629
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23152427 (100953ZJUN25) Notable: ‘Horrific’: Albanese condemns shooting of Nine journalist in US - Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has labelled the police shooting of Nine US correspondent Lauren Tomasi as “unacceptable”, but declined to say whether he would personally raise the incident with President Donald Trump. Tomasi was reporting live from the protests in Los Angeles when an officer appeared to turn and fire a rubber bullet at her leg on Monday morning AEST. Tomasi said she is bruised but otherwise uninjured, and continued working. Addressing the National Press Club in Canberra on Tuesday afternoon, Albanese said he had seen the “horrific” footage and spoken with Tomasi. “[That was] an Australian journalist doing what journalists do at their very best … In LA, it is not unreasonable to think that she would not have been targeted with a rubber bullet,” he said. “[She was] clearly identified as media. There was no ambiguity … We don’t find it acceptable that it occurred.” Albanese said the issue had been raised with the US administration, but refused to say whether he would personally raise the issue with Trump. “I’ll leave the discussions with the president until they occur,” he said.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73625
‘Horrific’: Albanese condemns shooting of Nine journalist in US
Amber Schultz - June 10, 2025
1/2
Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has labelled the police shooting of Nine US correspondent Lauren Tomasi as “unacceptable”, but declined to say whether he would personally raise the incident with President Donald Trump.
Tomasi was reporting live from the protests in Los Angeles when an officer appeared to turn and fire a rubber bullet at her leg on Monday morning AEST.
Tomasi said she is bruised but otherwise uninjured, and continued working.
Addressing the National Press Club in Canberra on Tuesday afternoon, Albanese said he had seen the “horrific” footage and spoken with Tomasi.
“[That was] an Australian journalist doing what journalists do at their very best … In LA, it is not unreasonable to think that she would not have been targeted with a rubber bullet,” he said.
“[She was] clearly identified as media. There was no ambiguity … We don’t find it acceptable that it occurred.”
Albanese said the issue had been raised with the US administration, but refused to say whether he would personally raise the issue with Trump.
“I’ll leave the discussions with the president until they occur,” he said.
The chief executive officer of Nine, Matt Stanton, said he welcomed an investigation into the incident by the Los Angeles Police Department and would write to the commissioner offering his support.
“Our focus has been on providing all the support Lauren and our camera operator James Phillips need in the aftermath of Sunday’s incident. As 9News continues to cover these dramatic and troubling events in Los Angeles for Australian audiences, the safety of our 9News teams in the US remains the priority,” Stanton said in a statement on Tuesday afternoon.
“The video footage captured by our team on Sunday showing a projectile fired from a police officer’s weapon was shocking and raised concerns from around the world, with valid questions around what could in any way have justified the actions taken by the police officer.”
Stanton thanked Albanese and other members of the government saying their “active and direct engagement....played an important role in ensuring an investigation has been established in such a timely manner.”
Nine is the publisher of this masthead.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73630
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23158064 (110946ZJUN25) Notable: Anthony Albanese under pressure from White House on NSW mining compensation ahead of Donald Trump talks - Anthony Albanese has been asked to personally intervene in a decade-old $400m compensation claim for Australian and US citizens over a NSW government mining confiscation as part of an upcoming deal with Donald Trump on trade tariffs. As the Prime Minister prepares to go to Canada for the G7 summit and meet the US President on the sidelines of the conference, trade representatives in Washington DC are seeking a resolution to the compensation claim arising from the NSW Liberal government’s confiscation of mining leases in 2014. US trade representatives have repeatedly raised the lack of compensation for US investors as a breach of the US-Australia Free Trade Agreement and listed it as an official “investment barrier” in its annual foreign trade barriers report released in March. Before Mr Albanese’s expected face-to-face meeting with Mr Trump, US and Australian representatives of “mum and dad” shareholders have appealed to Mr Albanese and Trade Minister Don Farrell to provide compensation and smooth trade relations. In a letter sent to Mr Albanese and Senator Farrell on behalf of 50 mum-and-dad shareholders last month, NuCoal resources chairman Gordon Galt raised concerns with the Prime Minister about the need for “proper redress for affected investors”. Mr Galt, who has fought a long-running battle with the NSW government to provide compensation for investors after then-premier Barry O’Farrell axed the Doyles Creek mining exploration licence, warned Mr Albanese that the matter threatened the “nation’s reputation as a safe destination for investment”.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50828 (pb)
>>73583
>>73611
Anthony Albanese under pressure from White House on NSW mining compensation ahead of Donald Trump talks
DENNIS SHANAHAN and GEOFF CHAMBERS - 11 June 2025
1/2
Anthony Albanese has been asked to personally intervene in a decade-old $400m compensation claim for Australian and US citizens over a NSW government mining confiscation as part of an upcoming deal with Donald Trump on trade tariffs.
As the Prime Minister prepares to go to Canada for the G7 summit and meet the US President on the sidelines of the conference, trade representatives in Washington DC are seeking a resolution to the compensation claim arising from the NSW Liberal government’s confiscation of mining leases in 2014.
US trade representatives have repeatedly raised the lack of compensation for US investors as a breach of the US-Australia Free Trade Agreement and listed it as an official “investment barrier” in its annual foreign trade barriers report released in March.
Before Mr Albanese’s expected face-to-face meeting with Mr Trump, US and Australian representatives of “mum and dad” shareholders have appealed to Mr Albanese and Trade Minister Don Farrell to provide compensation and smooth trade relations.
As well as the lack of compensation for US and Australian shareholders who have suffered financially, Mr Albanese has also been warned there are grave concerns about sovereign risk at a time of global trade uncertainty.
In a letter sent to Mr Albanese and Senator Farrell on behalf of 50 mum-and-dad shareholders last month, NuCoal resources chairman Gordon Galt raised concerns with the Prime Minister about the need for “proper redress for affected investors”.
Mr Galt, who has fought a long-running battle with the NSW government to provide compensation for investors after then-premier Barry O’Farrell axed the Doyles Creek mining exploration licence, warned Mr Albanese that the matter threatened the “nation’s reputation as a safe destination for investment”.
Former Labor MP for the Hunter Joel Fitzgibbon, who was a defence and agriculture minister in the Rudd government, said the decision was “a shocker” and had ruined families’ finances.
“They are mum and dad shareholders. Their only crime was having faith in a market regulated by the government. Yet it was a government which ripped their hard-earned savings away from them. It’s a shocker,” Mr Fitzgibbon told The Australian.
The Australian understands US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer has raised the NuCoal compensation matter with Senator Farrell in their Paris talks last week and in a March phone call.
The 40th Foreign Trade Barriers report released by Mr Greer in March warned US NuCoal investors have not been provided with “recourse to seek compensation”. The total compensation bill quoted by domestic and US investors is between $400m and $500m.
NuCoal acquired the Doyles Creek mining exploration licence in 2010 for more than $94m and raised $10m from investors. The licence was caught up in a ruling by the NSW Independent Commission Against Corruption over links to disgraced former Labor state minister Ian Macdonald, who in 2008 granted the licence to its former owner.
Despite years of lobbying, successive NSW premiers, including Chris Minns, have rebuffed recommendations made by a state parliamentary committee that compensation be provided.
Mr Minns this year told Mr Galt that while he empathised with NuCoal shareholders who lost their investments, he had a duty to “act in the public interest” and his priority was investing in hospitals, schools and essential public services.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73631
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23158072 (111003ZJUN25) Notable: Video: Australia joins UK in sanctioning Israeli ministers over Gaza comments - Foreign Affairs Minister Penny Wong says there “remains a great deal of strategic alignment” between the US and Australia after the Trump administration condemned the sanctions applied overnight on two right-wing Israeli ministers. Senator Wong did not say whether or not the US was given advance notice that Australia, alongside Canada, New Zealand, Norway and the UK, would impose the sanctions on Israeli national security minister Itamar Ben-Gvir and finance minister Bezalel Smotrich. The Israeli ministers will face travel bans and have their assets frozen, in a move condemned by Israel as “outrageous”. In a joint statement with other foreign ministers early Wednesday morning, Senator Wong said the two men would be black-listed for “for inciting violence against Palestinians in the West Bank”. “Settler violence is incited by extremist rhetoric which calls for Palestinians to be driven from their homes, encourages violence and human rights abuses and fundamentally rejects the two-state solution,” she said. The Trump administration condemned Australia and others over the sanctions, with Secretary of State Marco Rubio saying the move will not advance ceasefire efforts, the rescue of hostages, or an end to the war. Mr Rubio urged the five countries to reverse the sanctions, saying in a statement the US “condemns the sanctions imposed by the governments of the United Kingdom, Canada, Norway, New Zealand and Australia on two sitting members of the Israeli cabinet. We reject any notion of equivalence: Hamas is a terrorist organisation that committed unspeakable atrocities, continues to hold innocent civilians hostage, and prevents the people of Gaza from living in peace. We remind our partners not to forget who the real enemy is.”
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73526
>>73541
>>73549
Australia joins UK in sanctioning Israeli ministers over Gaza comments
NOAH YIM and LYDIA LYNCH - 11 June 2025
1/2
Foreign Affairs Minister Penny Wong says there “remains a great deal of strategic alignment” between the US and Australia after the Trump administration condemned the sanctions applied overnight on two right-wing Israeli ministers.
Senator Wong did not say whether or not the US was given advance notice that Australia, alongside Canada, New Zealand, Norway and the UK, would impose the sanctions on Israeli national security minister Itamar Ben-Gvir and finance minister Bezalel Smotrich.
“Was the Trump administration made aware that Australia would be implementing these sanctions?” Senator Wong was asked.
“Look, there are occasions on which, in our alliance, we have had differences of views and differences of the approach, but obviously there remains a great deal of strategic alignment across many domains,” she told ABC RN on Wednesday.
“In terms of how we deal with this diplomatically, I won’t go into all the detail of that, but you would anticipate that we have engaged with others as appropriate.”
The Israeli ministers will face travel bans and have their assets frozen, in a move condemned by Israel as “outrageous”. In a joint statement with other foreign ministers early Wednesday morning, Senator Wong said the two men would be black-listed for “for inciting violence against Palestinians in the West Bank”.
“Settler violence is incited by extremist rhetoric which calls for Palestinians to be driven from their homes, encourages violence and human rights abuses and fundamentally rejects the two-state solution,” she said.
“We are steadfastly committed to the two-state solution, which is the only way to guarantee security and dignity for Israelis and Palestinians and ensure long-term stability in the region, but it is imperilled by extremist settler violence and settlement expansion.”
The Trump administration condemned Australia and others over the sanctions, with Secretary of State Marco Rubio saying the move will not advance ceasefire efforts, the rescue of hostages, or an end to the war.
Mr Rubio urged the five countries to reverse the sanctions, saying in a statement the US “condemns the sanctions imposed by the governments of the United Kingdom, Canada, Norway, New Zealand and Australia on two sitting members of the Israeli cabinet. These sanctions do not advance US-led efforts to achieve a ceasefire, bring all hostages home, and end the war.
“We reject any notion of equivalence: Hamas is a terrorist organisation that committed unspeakable atrocities, continues to hold innocent civilians hostage, and prevents the people of Gaza from living in peace.
“We remind our partners not to forget who the real enemy is.
“The United States urges the reversal of the sanctions and stands shoulder-to-shoulder with Israel.”
Last month, Mr Smotrich said Gaza “will be entirely destroyed” and that Palestinians “will start to leave in great numbers to third countries”.
Mr Ben-Gvir, who has called for Al-Aqsa Mosque in Jerusalem to be replaced with a synagogue, last year said: “We must encourage emigration. Encourage the voluntary emigration of the residents of Gaza.”
The two ministers, who oppose allowing aid into Gaza, belong to far-right parties which Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has relied on to maintain his coalition government.
Posting on social media, Mr Smotrich said he learned of the sanctions while inaugurating a new West Bank settlement.
“We are determined with God’s help to continue and build,” he wrote.
Mr Ben-Gvir posted on X: “We overcame Pharoah, we’ll overcome Starmer’s Wall,” referring to UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73632
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23158079 (111014ZJUN25) Notable: ‘Entirely unacceptable’: Ambassador condemns Australian sanctions on senior Israeli ministers - A diplomatic brawl has broken out between Australia and the US after the Albanese government joined with allies in taking the extraordinary step of sanctioning far-right ministers in the Israeli government on the eve of a peace summit in New York. Highlighting Israel’s growing diplomatic isolation, Australia and the UK spearheaded a months-long push to freeze assets and slap travel bans on Itamar Ben-Gvir and Bezalel Smotrich over settler violence in the West Bank and advocating for the displacement of Gazans. Australia announced the move in a statement with Five Eyes security partners Canada and New Zealand and the diplomatically influential nation of Norway, in one of the most striking examples of Western pressure on Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to wind down Israel’s action in Gaza. The Israeli ambassador to Australia, Amir Maimon, said the Israeli government would meet early next week to determine how to respond. “The decision to impose sanctions on two Israeli cabinet ministers is deeply concerning and entirely unacceptable. These ministers are part of a government that operates under the principle of collective responsibility, making such measures unreasonable,” Maimon said.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73631
‘Entirely unacceptable’: Ambassador condemns Australian sanctions on senior Israeli ministers
Paul Sakkal and Rob Harris - June 11, 2025
1/2
A diplomatic brawl has broken out between Australia and the US after the Albanese government joined with allies in taking the extraordinary step of sanctioning far-right ministers in the Israeli government on the eve of a peace summit in New York.
Highlighting Israel’s growing diplomatic isolation, Australia and the UK spearheaded a months-long push to freeze assets and slap travel bans on Itamar Ben-Gvir and Bezalel Smotrich over settler violence in the West Bank and advocating for the displacement of Gazans.
Australia announced the move in a statement with Five Eyes security partners Canada and New Zealand and the diplomatically influential nation of Norway, in one of the most striking examples of Western pressure on Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to wind down Israel’s action in Gaza.
Ahead of Prime Minister Anthony Albanese’s expected meeting with Donald Trump next week, the US Secretary of State, Marco Rubio, condemned the sanctions, urging the countries “not to forget who the real enemy is”, referring to terror group Hamas.
Albanese said on Wednesday he did not believe Australia’s relationship with the US would be damaged by his government’s stance, which some within Labor have criticised as not being tough enough.
“Sometimes, friends have to be clear with each other,” Albanese said at a press conference in western Sydney.
“We support Israel’s right to live and to exist in secure borders. But we also support the legitimate aspirations of Palestinians.”
The legal basis for Australia’s sanctions were underpinned mostly by the remarks and actions of Ben-Gvir, Israel’s national security minister, and Smotrich, the finance minister, in supporting the behaviour of Israeli settlers. Settlers seeking to increase Israel’s footprint in the occupied West Bank have been ramping up the building of settlements in the area. The ministers have recently grown in influence as Netanyahu relies on their support to remain in power.
At Ben-Gvir’s direction his ministry purchased thousands of rifles for settler communities, where some groups have been dispossessing Palestinians and committing violent acts.
Smotrich has also made inflammatory public remarks, including stating that Gaza “will be entirely destroyed” and suggesting Palestinians be forced to emigrate. Last year, he indicated the deaths of 2 million Palestinians by starvation in Gaza might be “justified”, comments that drew rebukes from allies including Germany.
But British officials said the sanctions were also designed to pressure Netanyahu to negotiate a ceasefire as humanitarian conditions in the strip become increasingly dire. Hamas has not agreed to release all the remaining hostages.
Foreign Minister Penny Wong said the international community’s patience had run out, declining to rule out further sanctions on the government of Israel.
“The situation in the West Bank and the situation in Gaza are untenable, both for civilians and long-term peace in the form of a two-state solution,” she said in Canberra on Wednesday.
Wong gave multiple media interviews and a press conference about the sanctions on Wednesday in a departure from Labor’s more reserved tone on the matter in its previous term of government, when former opposition leader Peter Dutton frequently castigated the government for breaking with Israel.
The Israeli ambassador to Australia, Amir Maimon, said the Israeli government would meet early next week to determine how to respond.
“The decision to impose sanctions on two Israeli cabinet ministers is deeply concerning and entirely unacceptable. These ministers are part of a government that operates under the principle of collective responsibility, making such measures unreasonable,” Maimon said.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73633
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23158114 (111037ZJUN25) Notable: Video: Malcolm Turnbull’s warning for the world as Donald Trump solidifies power in the US - Former Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull has thrown the gloves down again, boldly warning the world that Donald Trump risks sending America into a new era of authoritarianism. Speaking on ABC News on Tuesday afternoon, Mr Turnbull cautioned Australia and its allies to prepare for a more volatile international order, urging democratic nations to become less dependent on an increasingly unpredictable United States under the billionaire commander-in-chief. Mr Turnbull expanded on a recent essay he published in Foreign Affairs, arguing that “those countries that share the values for which the United States once stood, but currently does not, should band together to preserve what worked best in the order Trump is intent on burying.” Following Mr Trump’s inauguration, Mr Turnbull has spent much of 2025 calling for strategic independence among Western democracies and a renewed commitment to multilateralism, free trade and stability. He said Mr Trump’s “erratic” leadership has undermined trust in America’s role as a global stabiliser. He also touched on the escalating situation in Los Angeles, where federal authorities have deployed marines in response to anti-ICE protests and arrests of undocumented immigrants. “You can understand Governor Newsom feeling that Trump is trying to provoke a greater crisis there,” Mr Turnbull said. “These are dangerous times in America … There are many people in America now - serious people – who are concerned that America is slipping into a realm of authoritarianism … almost of tyranny. And that should be very concerning for us.”
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>50771 (pb)
>>73441
>>73608
Malcolm Turnbull’s warning for the world as Donald Trump solidifies power in the US
Malcolm Turnbull has never hesitated to rip Donald Trump on the world stage, but his latest warning has cut a much bleaker tone.
Alex Blair - June 10, 2025
1/2
Former Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull has thrown the gloves down again, boldly warning the world that Donald Trump risks sending America into a new era of authoritarianism.
Speaking on ABC News on Tuesday afternoon, Mr Turnbull cautioned Australia and its allies to prepare for a more volatile international order, urging democratic nations to become less dependent on an increasingly unpredictable United States under the billionaire commander-in-chief.
Mr Turnbull expanded on a recent essay he published in Foreign Affairs, arguing that “those countries that share the values for which the United States once stood, but currently does not, should band together to preserve what worked best in the order Trump is intent on burying.”
Following Mr Trump’s inauguration, Mr Turnbull has spent much of 2025 calling for strategic independence among Western democracies and a renewed commitment to multilateralism, free trade and stability.
He said Mr Trump’s “erratic” leadership has undermined trust in America’s role as a global stabiliser.
He also touched on the escalating situation in Los Angeles, where federal authorities have deployed marines in response to anti-ICE protests and arrests of undocumented immigrants.
“You can understand Governor Newsom feeling that Trump is trying to provoke a greater crisis there,” Mr Turnbull said. “These are dangerous times in America … There are many people in America now – serious people – who are concerned that America is slipping into a realm of authoritarianism … almost of tyranny. And that should be very concerning for us.”
On the flip side, Mr Trump feels emboldened by his election win, which he views as a “mandate” to enact policies he believes will strengthen the US from within. Everything from cutting foreign aid to damaging relationships with long-held partners is on the table for the Republican, who Mr Turnbull believes will flip-flop on just about any deal when he sees fit.
“We should honour [commitments] on trade and in particular should be working to expand our free trade relations with other countries that do share our values of free trade, which Mr Trump does not,” Mr Turnbull continued.
He praised renewed efforts to revive the Australia–European Community free trade agreement and Emmanuel Macron’s push to associate France with the CPTPP. “In other words, expanding relationships – and a similar approach should be done in defence.”
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73634
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23163733 (120825ZJUN25) Notable: Alliance assessment:Pentagon launches review of Aukus nuclear submarine deal- The Pentagon has launched a review of the 2021 Aukus submarine deal with the UK and Australia, throwing the security pact into doubt at a time of heightened tension with China. The review to determine whether the US should scrap the project is being led by Elbridge Colby, a top defence department official who previously expressed scepticism about Aukus, according to six people familiar with the matter. Ending the submarine and advanced technology development agreement would destroy a pillar of security co-operation between the allies. The review has triggered anxiety in London and Canberra. While Aukus has received strong support from US lawmakers and experts, some critics say it could undermine the country’s security because the navy is struggling to produce more American submarines as the threat from Beijing is rising. Australia and Britain are due to co-produce an attack submarine class known as the SSN-Aukus that will come into service in the early 2040s. But the US has committed to selling up to five Virginia class submarines to Australia from 2032 to bridge the gap as it retires its current fleet of vessels. That commitment would almost certainly lapse if the US pulled out of Aukus. Last year, Colby wrote on X that he was sceptical about Aukus and that it “would be crazy” for the US to have fewer nuclear-powered attack submarines, known as SSNs, in the case of a conflict over Taiwan. In March, Colby said it would be “great” for Australia to have SSNs but cautioned there was a “very real threat of a conflict in the coming years” and that US SSNs would be “absolutely essential” to defend Taiwan. Sceptics of the nuclear technology-sharing pact have also questioned whether the US should help Australia obtain the submarines without an explicit commitment to use them in any war with China.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73432
Pentagon launches review of Aukus nuclear submarine deal
Ending pact would be blow to security alliance with Australia and UK
Demetri Sevastopulo - 12 June 2025
1/2
The Pentagon has launched a review of the 2021 Aukus submarine deal with the UK and Australia, throwing the security pact into doubt at a time of heightened tension with China.
The review to determine whether the US should scrap the project is being led by Elbridge Colby, a top defence department official who previously expressed scepticism about Aukus, according to six people familiar with the matter.
Ending the submarine and advanced technology development agreement would destroy a pillar of security co-operation between the allies. The review has triggered anxiety in London and Canberra.
While Aukus has received strong support from US lawmakers and experts, some critics say it could undermine the country’s security because the navy is struggling to produce more American submarines as the threat from Beijing is rising.
Australia and Britain are due to co-produce an attack submarine class known as the SSN-Aukus that will come into service in the early 2040s. But the US has committed to selling up to five Virginia class submarines to Australia from 2032 to bridge the gap as it retires its current fleet of vessels.
That commitment would almost certainly lapse if the US pulled out of Aukus.
Last year, Colby wrote on X that he was sceptical about Aukus and that it “would be crazy” for the US to have fewer nuclear-powered attack submarines, known as SSNs, in the case of a conflict over Taiwan.
In March, Colby said it would be “great” for Australia to have SSNs but cautioned there was a “very real threat of a conflict in the coming years” and that US SSNs would be “absolutely essential” to defend Taiwan.
Sceptics of the nuclear technology-sharing pact have also questioned whether the US should help Australia obtain the submarines without an explicit commitment to use them in any war with China.
Kurt Campbell, the deputy secretary of state in the Biden administration who was the US architect of Aukus, last year stressed the importance of Australia having SSNs that could work closely with the US in the case of a war over Taiwan. But Canberra has not publicly linked the need for the vessels to a conflict over Taiwan.
The review comes amid mounting anxiety among US allies about some of the Trump administration’s positions. Colby has told the UK and other European allies to focus more on the Euro-Atlantic region and reduce their activity in the Indo-Pacific.
One person familiar with the debate over Aukus said Canberra and London were “incredibly anxious” about the Aukus review.
“Aukus is the most substantial military and strategic undertaking between the US, Australia and Great Britain in generations,” Campbell told the Financial Times.
“Efforts to increase co-ordination, defence spending and common ambition should be welcomed. Any bureaucratic effort to undermine Aukus would lead to a crisis in confidence among our closest security and political partners.”
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73635
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23163745 (120834ZJUN25) Notable: US launches AUKUS review to ensure it meets Donald Trump's 'America First' agenda - The Pentagon is reviewing the AUKUS security pact between Australia, the US and the UK to ensure it aligns with President Donald Trump's "America First" agenda, a US defence official told the ABC. But Defence Minister Richard Marles said he remained confident the pact would remain intact, and a review was a "perfectly natural" thing for a new administration to do. The news follows US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth's recent request for Australia to significantly boost its defence spending "as soon as possible". The US defence official said the review "will ensure the initiative meets … common sense, America First criteria". "As Secretary Hegseth has made clear, this means ensuring the highest readiness of our service members, that allies step up fully to do their part for collective defence, and that the defence industrial base is meeting our needs," the official said. Under the AUKUS pact, Australia would be armed with nuclear-powered submarines at a cost of more than $350 billion. Elbridge Colby, who is the under secretary of Defense for Policy and has voiced scepticism about AUKUS, is leading the review, according to the UK's Financial Times. Last August, Mr Colby tweeted he was an AUKUS "agnostic". "In principle it's a great idea. But I've been very skeptical in practice," he wrote, but added he'd become "more inclined based on new information I've gleaned".
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73432
>>73634
US launches AUKUS review to ensure it meets Donald Trump's 'America First' agenda
Brad Ryan and Emilie Gramenz - 12 June 2025
1/2
The Pentagon is reviewing the AUKUS security pact between Australia, the US and the UK to ensure it aligns with President Donald Trump's "America First" agenda, a US defence official told the ABC.
But Defence Minister Richard Marles said he remained confident the pact would remain intact, and a review was a "perfectly natural" thing for a new administration to do.
The news follows US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth's recent request for Australia to significantly boost its defence spending "as soon as possible".
The US defence official said the review "will ensure the initiative meets … common sense, America First criteria".
"As Secretary Hegseth has made clear, this means ensuring the highest readiness of our service members, that allies step up fully to do their part for collective defence, and that the defence industrial base is meeting our needs," the official said.
Under the AUKUS pact, Australia would be armed with nuclear-powered submarines at a cost of more than $350 billion.
Elbridge Colby, who is the under secretary of Defense for Policy and has voiced scepticism about AUKUS, is leading the review, according to the UK's Financial Times.
Last August, Mr Colby tweeted he was an AUKUS "agnostic".
"In principle it's a great idea. But I've been very skeptical in practice," he wrote, but added he'd become "more inclined based on new information I've gleaned".
Mr Marles told ABC Radio Melbourne he was "very confident this [AUKUS] is going to happen".
"The meetings that we've had with the United States have been very positive in respect of AUKUS," Mr Marles said. "That dates back to my most recent meeting with Pete Hegseth in Singapore."
He pushed back on the suggestion Australia needed a plan B.
"There is a plan here. We are sticking to it and we're going to deliver," he said. "Chopping and changing guarantees you will never have the capability."
White House 'regularly' reviewing foreign agreements
Former ambassador to the US Joe Hockey speculated Mr Colby may have initiated the review himself, suggesting he had "seen the opportunity" when Prime Minister Anthony Albanese reacted dismissively to US requests for more defence spending.
"At the end of the day, there is still strong support for AUKUS across the Congress and in the White House," he told ABC Radio National.
A White House official told the ABC that the Trump administration was "regularly" reviewing foreign agreements to ensure they fit the America First agenda, especially those initiated by the Biden administration.
The Australian government paid the US almost $800 million earlier this year — the first in a series of payments to help America improve its submarine manufacturing capabilities.
AUKUS has enjoyed bipartisan support in all three countries, and senior Trump administration figures including Mr Hegseth and Secretary of State Marco Rubio have previously spoken in support of it.
But late last month, Mr Hegseth met Defence Minister Richard Marles in Singapore, and said Australia needed to lift its defence spending.
Mr Trump himself has said little publicly about the AUKUS pact, and his criticisms of America's traditional alliances have fuelled anxieties about its future in Canberra and London.
When a reporter asked Mr Trump about AUKUS in February, he appeared to be unfamiliar with the term, replying: "What does that mean?"
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73636
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23163758 (120852ZJUN25) Notable: ‘Save Australia from itself’: Paul Keating fires up as Trump administration announces review into AUKUS deal - America’s bombshell review into the future of the AUKUS nuclear power submarine deal could be the “moment Washington saves Australia from itself”, former Prime Minister Paul Keating has said. Australia made its first AUKUS down payment to the US in February, transferring nearly $800 million to help boost the country’s submarine production. Overnight, the Trump Administration announced its biggest AUKUS sceptic Elbridge Colby will head a review into whether the US should pull out of the submarine deal with Australia. Former Prime Minister Paul Keating has joined the chorus of Australia’s own AUKUS sceptics, saying the move “might very well be the moment Washington saves Australia from itself … from the most poorly conceived defence procurement program ever adopted by an Australian government”. In a statement, Mr Keating described AUKUS as being “hurriedly scribbled on the back of an envelope by Scott Morrison, along with the vacuous British blowhard Boris Johnson, and the confused president, Joe Biden - put together on an English beach, a world away from where Australia’s strategic interests primarily lie”. “The Albanese government had the chance to undertake a review on its own terms when first elected to office in May 2022, but denied itself the opportunity for fear of being seen as dodgy on the alliance,” Mr Keating said. “Now President Trump’s Pentagon, as it is entitled to do, is subjecting the deal to the kind of scrutiny that should have been applied to AUKUS in the first instance. The review makes clear that America keeps its national interests uppermost. But the concomitant question is: why has Australia failed to do the same?”
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73432
>>73634
‘Save Australia from itself’: Paul Keating fires up as Trump administration announces review into AUKUS deal
Samantha Maiden - June 12, 2025
1/2
America’s bombshell review into the future of the AUKUS nuclear power submarine deal could be the “moment Washington saves Australia from itself”, former Prime Minister Paul Keating has said.
Australia made its first AUKUS down payment to the US in February, transferring nearly $800 million to help boost the country’s submarine production.
Overnight, the Trump Administration announced its biggest AUKUS sceptic Elbridge Colby will head a review into whether the US should pull out of the submarine deal with Australia.
Former Prime Minister Paul Keating has joined the chorus of Australia’s own AUKUS sceptics, saying the move “might very well be the moment Washington saves Australia from itself … from the most poorly conceived defence procurement program ever adopted by an Australian government”.
In a statement, Mr Keating described AUKUS as being “hurriedly scribbled on the back of an envelope by Scott Morrison, along with the vacuous British blowhard Boris Johnson, and the confused president, Joe Biden – put together on an English beach, a world away from where Australia’s strategic interests primarily lie”.
“The Albanese government had the chance to undertake a review on its own terms when first elected to office in May 2022, but denied itself the opportunity for fear of being seen as dodgy on the alliance,” Mr Keating said.
“Now President Trump’s Pentagon, as it is entitled to do, is subjecting the deal to the kind of scrutiny that should have been applied to AUKUS in the first instance.
“The review makes clear that America keeps its national interests uppermost. But the concomitant question is: why has Australia failed to do the same?”
Turnbull trashes Aussie sub ‘fiasco’
Former Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull earlier warned the deal risks becoming a billion-dollar “fiasco” for Australia, telling news.com.au that the “terrible deal” inked by Scott Morrison had always included a clause or caveat that no submarines will be handed over unless it had submarines to spare.
“So this is a risk that Australia has taken with its eyes wide open,” Mr Turnbull said.
“It will be a fiasco, I think. So that’s one alternative. Another alternative is to go back to France. They’ve been double crossed once before.
“It is a debacle. I’ve been saying this for years. It was a debacle when Morrison recklessly entered into it, and it was a debacle when Labor, to avoid a political wedge, went along.
“It’s fundamentally a bad deal. I’m not saying naval nuclear propulsion is a bad idea. It’s a good idea, but it’s a very expensive one.
“But the problem with this deal is it’s so asymmetrical, we give the Americans $3 billion, they only have to give us submarines if they feel they could spare them.
“This whole exercise is designed to get us nuclear powered submarines, but the upshot could be that we end up with no submarines at all.”
Scott Morrison defends AUKUS
Meanwhile, former Prime Minister Scott Morrison has taken to social media to defend the review and urge critics to not “over-interpret” the move.
“The current US Department of Defense review of AUKUS is well within its remit and not unlike the strategic assessment recently conducted by the new UK Government following the election of Prime Minister Starmer,” he wrote.
“This is a departmental review, not a policy decision, and should not be over-interpreted.”
Mr Morrison, one of the original architects of the security pact, said it was a good opportunity for “Australia to make the case again”.
“We have a good case to make in both our own interests and those of our AUKUS partners, especially the US.”
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73637
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23163785 (120923ZJUN25) Notable: ‘Time to wake up’: Turnbull, opposition seize on Trump’s AUKUS review - Defence Minister Richard Marles and AUKUS architect Scott Morrison have insisted they are confident the United States will keep supporting the $368 billion submarine deal despite the Trump administration’s decision to review the security pact to ensure it puts “America first”. The United States on Thursday confirmed it was conducting a 30-day review into whether the AUKUS submarine deal should be changed or scrapped, throwing into doubt Australia’s future maritime defence and adding a pressure point to Prime Minister Anthony Albanese’s expected meeting with US President Donald Trump on the G7 sidelines in Canada next week. Former prime ministers Paul Keating and Malcolm Turnbull, both prominent AUKUS critics, said the US review gave the Albanese government cause to revisit the deal. But Marles downplayed the situation and revealed the government had known about the review for weeks. Keating said the review gave Australia an opportunity to forge a new path on national security and accused the Labor government of avoiding its own review “for fear of being seen as dodgy on the alliance”. Turnbull also questioned why Australia had not reviewed the scheme. “The UK is conducting a review of AUKUS. The US … is conducting a review of AUKUS,” he said on X. “But Australia, which has the most at stake, has no review. Our parliament to date has been the least curious and least informed. Time to wake up?”
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73432
>>73634
‘Time to wake up’: Turnbull, opposition seize on Trump’s AUKUS review
Michael Koziol - June 12, 2025
1/2
Defence Minister Richard Marles and AUKUS architect Scott Morrison have insisted they are confident the United States will keep supporting the $368 billion submarine deal despite the Trump administration’s decision to review the security pact to ensure it puts “America first”.
The United States on Thursday confirmed it was conducting a 30-day review into whether the AUKUS submarine deal should be changed or scrapped, throwing into doubt Australia’s future maritime defence and adding a pressure point to Prime Minister Anthony Albanese’s expected meeting with US President Donald Trump on the G7 sidelines in Canada next week.
Former prime ministers Paul Keating and Malcolm Turnbull, both prominent AUKUS critics, said the US review gave the Albanese government cause to revisit the deal. But Marles downplayed the situation and revealed the government had known about the review for weeks.
The United States’ decision to review the Joe Biden-era AUKUS arrangement – which will be examined to ensure it meets Trump’s “America First” priorities – follows its demands for American allies, including Australia, to significantly boost defence spending to 3.5 per cent of GDP.
Labor plans to lift spending from 2 per cent to 2.3 per cent by the 2030s. Coalition defence spokesman Angus Taylor said there was bipartisan support for AUKUS, but said the Albanese government had to come clean on whether the US had been provoked by Australia’s failure to pour more money into defence.
Morrison, who led the deal as prime minister, said the US review should not be overblown. “This is a departmental review, not a policy decision, and should not be over-interpreted,” he said in a statement.
Marles matched Morrison’s relaxed stance. “The review that’s been announced is not a surprise. We’ve been aware of this for some time. We welcome it. It’s something which is perfectly natural for an incoming administration to do,” Marles said on ABC Melbourne on Thursday morning.
“The United Kingdom undertook their own review when the Labour government was elected there in the middle of last year – and that’s reported, and is in fact very positive about AUKUS … The agreement is for the submarines to come in the early 2030s and that is what we are all working to, and I’m very confident that that is what is going to happen.”
The review was first reported on Wednesday (Thursday AEST) by The Financial Times, which said it would be headed by defence undersecretary Elbridge Colby and take about 30 days.
“The department is reviewing AUKUS as part of ensuring that this initiative of the previous administration is aligned with the president’s America First agenda,” a US defence official confirmed to this masthead.
“As [Defence] Secretary [Pete] Hegseth has made clear, this means ensuring the highest readiness of our service members, that allies step up fully to do their part for collective defence, and that the defence industrial base is meeting our needs.”
A separate US government official said: “The Trump administration is regularly reviewing foreign agreements to ensure they align with the American people’s interests, especially those initiated under the failed Biden foreign policy agenda.”
Taylor warned that Australia would “pay a heavy price” if AUKUS fell over as he pushed the Albanese government to escalate its defence spending to be closer in line with American asks.
“The Coalition stands ready to work with Labor to make sure that AUKUS is a success. It needs to be strong and it needs to be effective, but bipartisanship will not be a shield for inaction,” he said.
Critics made the opposite case. Keating said the review gave Australia an opportunity to forge a new path on national security and accused the Labor government of avoiding its own review “for fear of being seen as dodgy on the alliance”.
“AUKUS will be shown for it always has been: a deal hurriedly scribbled on the back of an envelope by Scott Morrison, along with the vacuous British blowhard Boris Johnson and the confused president, Joe Biden,” he said in a statement.
“The usual American apologists are already out in the press today insisting that the prime minister leaves his meeting with Trump on the weekend with a guarantee that AUKUS survives. It is an impossible ask.”
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73638
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23163812 (120941ZJUN25) Notable: Jihadi preacher concedes ‘sermons not private’ in hate speech case - Lawyers for Jihadi preacher Wissam Haddad have conceded a central pillar of their defence, acknowledging the cleric’s sermons were not private amid a racial discrimination trial that has hinged on the public accessibility of his remarks. Mr Haddad, who legally changed his first name to William more than twenty years ago but who is also known as Abu Ousayd, has sought to argue he was only speaking to his Muslim congregants at the Bankstown Al Madina Dawah Centre - a co-respondent in his Federal Court case brought by Executive Council of Australian Jewry co-chief executive Peter Wertheim and deputy president Robert Goot – when he made sermons about the conflict in Israel after October 7, 2023. At the beginning of the case’s closing remarks on Thursday, ECAJ barrister Peter Braham SC said Mr Haddad had conceded the argument and acknowledged his speeches were likely to be seen by an audience outside of his congregation. Mr Haddad’s barrister, Andrew Boe, confirmed this. “We formally communicated to the appellant’s team that the respondents concede that the speeches were not … private,” Mr Boe said. The partial concession means Justice Angus Stewart need only judge Mr Haddad’s potential breach of two other elements of section 18C of the Racial Discrimination Act - whether Mr Haddad’s sermons were likely to offend and whether they targeted those of a specific race, colour or national or ethnic origin.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73626
>>73627
Jihadi preacher concedes ‘sermons not private’ in hate speech case
Wissam Haddad has acknowledged his sermons on Jews after October 7 could be accessed broadly and would not stay confined to his Bankstown prayer centre.
JAMES DOWLING - June 12, 2025
Lawyers for Jihadi preacher Wissam Haddad have conceded a central pillar of their defence, acknowledging the cleric’s sermons were not private amid a racial discrimination trial that has hinged on the public accessibility of his remarks.
Mr Haddad, who legally changed his first name to William more than twenty years ago but who is also known as Abu Ousayd, has sought to argue he was only speaking to his Muslim congregants at the Bankstown Al Madina Dawah Centre – a co-respondent in his Federal Court case brought by Executive Council of Australian Jewry co-chief executive Peter Wertheim and deputy president Robert Goot – when he made sermons about the conflict in Israel after October 7, 2023.
At the beginning of the case’s closing remarks on Thursday, ECAJ barrister Peter Braham SC said Mr Haddad had conceded the argument and acknowledged his speeches were likely to be seen by an audience outside of his congregation.
Mr Haddad’s barrister, Andrew Boe, confirmed this.
“We formally communicated to the appellant’s team that the respondents concede that the speeches were not … private,” Mr Boe said.
The partial concession means Justice Angus Stewart need only judge Mr Haddad’s potential breach of two other elements of section 18C of the Racial Discrimination Act – whether Mr Haddad’s sermons were likely to offend and whether they targeted those of a specific race, colour or national or ethnic origin.
Mr Haddad took to the witness box on Wednesday, defending his preachings in the face of Mr Braham’s suggestion he was a wannabe influencer who “revelled” in “flippant provocations”.
The wide-ranging cross-examination presented Mr Haddad with a patchwork of alleged media stunts he conducted in the lead-up to five speeches about Jews that provoked the legal action, which Mr Braham contended indicated a pattern of willing and incendiary public dialogue by Mr Haddad.
He told the Federal Court he “never set out to insult Jews” when he recited parables about their killing and made sermons at his Bankstown prayer centre in Sydney’s southwest calling them treacherous and vile.
“I never set out to insult Jews,” he said. “The words of Allah are eternal, so whatever He said then holds now, but specifically for Jews of faith, not ethnicity.”
Probing this defence, Mr Braham at one stage asked Mr Haddad why he had parroted an anti-Semitic trope suggesting Jewish cabalists controlled mass media and Hollywood, with Mr Haddad saying he had been referencing the Israeli government.
“Jews of the Israeli government don’t have Hollywood blockbuster films, Mr Haddad, Hollywood’s in Los Angeles in America,” Mr Braham said.
Mr Haddad told the barrister he “wouldn’t have a clue” where Hollywood was because he had “never been to the States”.
It was part of a series of stipulations he made in the witness box about his prior sermons, suggesting remarks that seemingly applied to the entire Jewish diaspora were rather about Jews who practised their faith or specific indictments of senior Israeli government figures. His audience of Muslim congregants would understand these stipulations implicitly, the court heard.
He has repeatedly said his remarks were pulled from Islamic scripture.
“A very large part of the respondent’s case here is that these speeches were delivered in private to a purely Muslim audience, and it wasn’t reasonably likely that they would come to the attention of the broader community, and that is absolutely not how this man has run his life,” Mr Braham said.
“It’s put forward by the respondent that the purpose for which the speech was given was a serious discussion of current affairs, but this is not a man, in our submission, who engages in serious discussions.
“A very large part of the respondent’s case here is that these speeches were delivered in private to a purely Muslim audience, and it wasn’t reasonably likely that they would come to the attention of the broader community, and that is absolutely not how this man has run his life.
“He’s a man who engages in flippant provocations of other segments of the community … and that’s how he gains attention.”
ECAJ is seeking declarations that Mr Haddad contravened section 18C, injunctions to remove the five offending sermons from the internet, and an order that the cleric refrain from publishing similar speeches in future.
The trial will conclude on Friday before Justice Stewart retires to consider his judgement.
https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/jihadi-preacher-concedes-sermons-not-private-in-hate-speech-case/news-story/e71f5793b2413ea60417ad1418d4e121
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73639
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23163825 (120949ZJUN25) Notable: Battlelines drawn as Governor approves July 19 Tasmanian election - Tasmanians will go to the polls on July 19 - for the second time in 16 months – after the state’s Governor on Wednesday night finally agreed to the early election requested by Premier Jeremy Rockliff. The election - Tasmania’s fourth in a little over seven years – follows an extended power vacuum after Mr Rockliff last week suffered a no-confidence motion in the House of Assembly. Governor Barbara Baker, who on Tuesday night deferred a decision on Mr Rockliff’s election request, said she had decided there was no real alternative. “Notwithstanding the recent 2024 election, the public interest in avoiding the cost of another election and the prevailing public mood against holding an election, I have granted Premier Rockliff a dissolution,” Ms Baker said. Mr Rockliff welcomed the decision. “A state election has been called for July 19 - one that we’re going to fight in the name of common decency,” he said via social media. “To draw a line in the sand, as Tasmanians, and stand up for what we believe in. Not political games. But building a better Tasmania. Your support over these last few days has been nothing short of incredible. I have been truly humbled. Now let’s get on with it.” Labor leader Dean Winter said Tasmanians now had “a choice”, flagging a campaign attack based on Mr Rockliff’s abandoned privatisation agenda.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73594
>>73606
>>73614
Battlelines drawn as Governor approves July 19 Tasmanian election
MATTHEW DENHOLM - June 11, 2025
1/2
Tasmanians will go to the polls on July 19 – for the second time in 16 months – after the state’s Governor on Wednesday night finally agreed to the early election requested by Premier Jeremy Rockliff.
The election – Tasmania’s fourth in a little over seven years – follows an extended power vacuum after Mr Rockliff last week suffered a no-confidence motion in the House of Assembly.
Governor Barbara Baker, who on Tuesday night deferred a decision on Mr Rockliff’s election request, said she had decided there was no real alternative. “Notwithstanding the recent 2024 election, the public interest in avoiding the cost of another election and the prevailing public mood against holding an election, I have granted Premier Rockliff a dissolution,” Ms Baker said.
“I make this grant because I am satisfied that there is no real possibility that an alternative government can be formed.”
Mr Rockliff welcomed the decision. “A state election has been called for July 19 – one that we’re going to fight in the name of common decency,” he said via social media.
“To draw a line in the sand, as Tasmanians, and stand up for what we believe in. Not political games. But building a better Tasmania.
“Your support over these last few days has been nothing short of incredible. I have been truly humbled. Now let’s get on with it.”
Labor leader Dean Winter said Tasmanians now had “a choice”, flagging a campaign attack based on Mr Rockliff’s abandoned privatisation agenda.
“The Liberals want to sell off Tasmania, while Labor will keep Tasmania in Tasmanian hands,” Mr Winter said. “Selling off Tasmania means higher prices for power, public transport, and other essentials.
“Only a vote for Labor will ensure Tasmanian profits stay in Tasmania, investing in schools, health, and housing. Our entire labour movement is united and ready to send the Liberals a loud message – Tasmania is not for sale.
“It’s time for a fresh start for Tasmania.”
There had been pressure within the Liberal Party and the business community for Mr Rockliff to resign to allow the party to choose another leader and avoid the snap poll.
However, Mr Rockliff refused to quit and despite several senior ministers being willing to take his place, none were willing to force a spill of the leadership.
The Liberal government, in power since 2014, most recently in a weakened minority administration since March 2024, faces an uphill battle to retain power.
It has taken the state deeply into state debt, recently unveiling a budget doubling net debt to almost $11bn by 2028, while being plagued by allegations of bungled infrastructure projects.
The most notable of these was the failure to build adequate wharf facilities for $1bn new Bass Strait ferries, and alleged mishandling of the contentious $1bn Hobart AFL stadium.
Both major parties are committed to the stadium – a key condition of Tasmania gaining an AFL team.
However, the election casts further doubt over the project’s future, given delays to legislation fast-tracking the project and uncertainty over the make-up of any crossbench, with few pundits predicting a majority government.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73640
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23163835 (121000ZJUN25) Notable: Albanese-Trump G7 meeting in limbo as Israeli cabinet sanctions trigger US rebuke - Anthony Albanese may not meet with Donald Trump next week in Canada as relations with the US administration sour. The countries' relationship is being tested by Australia's decision to sanction two Israeli cabinet members, plus a fresh American review of AUKUS following a disagreement over defence spending. While a potential in-person meeting on the sidelines of the Group of Seven leaders gathering in Alberta is still anticipated, senior sources told the ABC it was too soon to be "definitive" and that there were "lots of moving parts". The prime minister departs for North America on Friday morning for the June 15-17 summit amid expectations he will sit down with Mr Trump to discuss US trade tariffs on Australian steel and other goods, and defence cooperation. But there is also an awareness inside the Australian and US governments that Australia's decision to slap sanctions on two hard-right Israeli ministers - Itamar Ben-Gvir and Bezalel Smotrich — could trigger the "mercurial" Mr Trump's ire. The sanctions, which were mirrored by the UK, Canada, Norway and New Zealand, triggered an exchange of words on Wednesday between US Secretary of State Marco Rubio - who described them as counterproductive to peace in the region — and Mr Albanese, who dismissed the US charge as "predictable, frankly".
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73631
>>73583
>>73634
Albanese-Trump G7 meeting in limbo as Israeli cabinet sanctions trigger US rebuke
Jacob Greber - 12 June 2025
Anthony Albanese may not meet with Donald Trump next week in Canada as relations with the US administration sour.
The countries' relationship is being tested by Australia's decision to sanction two Israeli cabinet members, plus a fresh American review of AUKUS following a disagreement over defence spending.
While a potential in-person meeting on the sidelines of the Group of Seven leaders gathering in Alberta is still anticipated, senior sources told the ABC it was too soon to be "definitive" and that there were "lots of moving parts".
The prime minister departs for North America on Friday morning for the June 15-17 summit amid expectations he will sit down with Mr Trump to discuss US trade tariffs on Australian steel and other goods, and defence cooperation.
But there is also an awareness inside the Australian and US governments that Australia's decision to slap sanctions on two hard-right Israeli ministers — Itamar Ben-Gvir and Bezalel Smotrich — could trigger the "mercurial" Mr Trump's ire.
The sanctions, which were mirrored by the UK, Canada, Norway and New Zealand, triggered an exchange of words on Wednesday between US Secretary of State Marco Rubio — who described them as counterproductive to peace in the region — and Mr Albanese, who dismissed the US charge as "predictable, frankly".
While Mr Albanese downplayed potential fallout from the sanctions, saying the matter was not a priority, he insisted the Israeli government "does need to uphold its obligations under international law".
The clash with the US over the sanctions came hot on the heels of a disagreement with the Trump administration over defence spending levels, followed this week by revelations the Pentagon would review whether the AUKUS defence pact fit with Mr Trump's "America-first" agenda.
Mr Albanese this month rebuffed US Defense Secretary Peter Hegseth's call for Australia to increase "as soon as possible" its military spending to 3.5 per cent of GDP from the current level of just over 2 per cent.
While there is uncertainty about Mr Trump's willingness to meet with Mr Albanese, there is also a sense the US president is enduring his own disagreements with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu over Gaza.
Labor's decision to impose sanctions on the Israeli cabinet members was criticised by the Greens as "extremely late" while the opposition warned the government had "made a mistake".
Liberal senator Andrew Bragg said the use of "Magnitsky-style" sanctions on democratically elected ministers of state was inappropriate.
The Australia/Israel & Jewish Affairs Council (AIJAC) slammed the government's "unprecedented" sanctions as a major escalation, while acknowledging the two ministers were controversial.
"AIJAC finds many statements by Smotrich and especially Ben-Gvir insupportable and we share the government's concern about settler violence against West Bank Palestinians and call on Israeli authorities to do more to stop them," said the group's executive director, Colin Rubenstein.
"However, there are many leaders of the Palestinian Authority, Iran, Turkey, and Qatar who are saying things at least as inflammatory, if not more so.
"Yet, there is no discussion of sanctioning any of them."
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-06-12/albanese-trump-g7-meeting-uncertain-israel-sanctions/105405674
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73641
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23174081 (132338ZJUN25) Notable: Labor’s Israeli sanctions ‘put Australia on the US radar’ - Increasing differences between Washington and Canberra on foreign policies, including the approach to Israel and position on defence spending, have put Australia “on the US radar” and opened up the “opportunity” for the Trump administration to trigger a review of the multibillion-dollar AUKUS deal, former government ministers say. Despite Labor confirming it had known about the Trump administration’s intention to review AUKUS for “some time”, the formal announcement came just a day after US Secretary of State Marco Rubio condemned the sanctioning of two Israeli ministers by Australia and Five Eyes partners such as Britain, saying the move did “not advance US-led efforts to achieve a ceasefire”. Defence Minister Richard Marles sought to downplay the review, to be led by vocal AUKUS critic and Under Secretary of Defence for Policy Elbridge Colby, saying it was a “natural step” for US President Donald Trump to take. Former Australian ambassador to Washington Joe Hockey said Anthony Albanese’s push back against Mr Hegseth’s call for Australia to spend 3.5 per cent of its GDP on defence was part of there reason behind the review. “I think he would have seen the opportunity in the disagreement between Secretary Hegseth and Prime Minister Albanese,” he told ABC. “He would have seen that as an opportunity to have a review of AUKUS, probably initiated by himself.” Mr Hockey said there was “still strong support for AUKUS across congress and the White House”.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73631
>>73634
>>73640
Labor’s Israeli sanctions ‘put Australia on the US radar’
SARAH ISON - June 12, 2025
Increasing differences between Washington and Canberra on foreign policies, including the approach to Israel and position on defence spending, have put Australia “on the US radar” and opened up the “opportunity” for the Trump administration to trigger a review of the multibillion-dollar AUKUS deal, former government ministers say.
Despite Labor confirming it had known about the Trump administration’s intention to review AUKUS for “some time”, the formal announcement came just a day after US Secretary of State Marco Rubio condemned the sanctioning of two Israeli ministers by Australia and Five Eyes partners such as Britain, saying the move did “not advance US-led efforts to achieve a ceasefire”.
Defence Minister Richard Marles sought to downplay the review, to be led by vocal AUKUS critic and Under Secretary of Defence for Policy Elbridge Colby, saying it was a “natural step” for US President Donald Trump to take. “I am comfortable about it and I think it’s a pretty natural step for an incoming government to take and we’ll have an opportunity to engage with it,” he told Sky News. “Obviously, I met with my counterpart, Pete Hegseth, just a couple of weeks ago and that was a very positive meeting in relation to the progress of AUKUS and how we see it going.”
Former Australian ambassador to Washington Joe Hockey said Anthony Albanese’s push back against Mr Hegseth’s call for Australia to spend 3.5 per cent of its GDP on defence was part of there reason behind the review.
“I think he would have seen the opportunity in the disagreement between Secretary Hegseth and Prime Minister Albanese,” he told ABC. “He would have seen that as an opportunity to have a review of AUKUS, probably initiated by himself.”
Mr Hockey said there was “still strong support for AUKUS across congress and the White House”.
Former Labor minister and co-convener of Labor Friends of Israel Mike Kelly said it was clear the government had been moving out of step with the US and there were now clear consequences.
“Certainly, I think we’re now starting to appear on the US radar in terms of our activities,” he said.
“The denial of the visit by Hillel Fuld to Australia has been raised in the US. This sanctions activity and what steps we might take at this UN meeting (next week) will also be of great interest to the US.”
The Prime Minister on Wednesday labelled the outcry from the US over the sanctioning of Israeli ministers Itamar Ben-Gvir and Bezalel Smotrich as “predictable” and added the matter was “not the priority” in discussions that he had with Mr Trump.
Whether Mr Albanese is able to have his first proper face-to-face discussion with Mr Trump on the sidelines of the G7 is yet to be seen, with the US President having not yet confirmed whether a bilateral meeting or informal pull-aside discussion would take place.
Opposition defence spokesman Angus Taylor said a meeting between the two leaders needed to take place “as soon as possible” to provide clarity and certainty on the future of AUKUS.
“When will the Prime Minister meet with … President Trump, to discuss this face to face? We understood there was a meeting that was going to proceed. That is less clear now,” he said. “It is hugely important the Prime Minister meet with the President to discuss this.”
While Labor’s sanctions of Israeli ministers and response to calls to increase defence spending were pointed to as having likely inflamed tensions with Mr Trump, analysts said an increasing divide between the US and Australia had been months in the making.
Strategic Analysis Australia founder Michael Shoebridge said Labor had benefited politically from distancing itself from Mr Trump and the US during the campaign, while seeking to accuse Peter Dutton of “copying” policies from the US, but was potentially now seeing the consequences of that language.
He said the diverging positions between the US and Australia came as Washington was grappling with significantly curbing its own submarine capability in order to lock in supply to Australia.
“Their core question is, is weakening America to strengthen Australia worth doing?” he said.
“If there’s a war over Taiwan, will Australian submarines be there? And our government’s made the obvious point, we’ll make our own decision at the time.
“We can’t give and we wouldn’t give future commitments.”
https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/defence/labors-israeli-sanctions-put-australia-on-the-us-radar/news-story/95e7ab7bd7ebc0f5ca5057d3930c1b00
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73642
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23174371 (140034ZJUN25) Notable: Anthony Albanese’s mission: save the AUKUS pact - Anthony Albanese is preparing a series of major defence funding announcements and will ensure Australia delivers on its pledge to service US nuclear submarines from 2027, as his government scrambles to lock in support from Donald Trump on the $368bn AUKUS pact. The Prime Minister on Friday will fly from Canberra on a critical one-week overseas trip that will bring him face to face with the President for the first time, amid concerns from the US that AUKUS will force it to deliver major funding and defence capabilities to a country that has not committed to support Washington in a conflict over Taiwan. Ahead of Mr Albanese travelling to Fiji, the US and Canada, the Pentagon on Thursday announced a snap 30-day review of the AUKUS nuclear submarine deal, led by influential Defence Under Secretary for Policy, Elbridge Colby, who has expressed concerns about Australian defence spending and American industrial shipbuilding capacity. As G7 leaders prepare to gather in the Canadian town of Kananaskis over the weekend amid rising tensions between the US and Iran, The Australian understands Mr Trump is yet to lock in any bilateral meetings with counterparts including Mr Albanese.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73634
>>73640
Anthony Albanese’s mission: save the AUKUS pact
GEOFF CHAMBERS - June 12, 2025
1/2
Anthony Albanese is preparing a series of major defence funding announcements and will ensure Australia delivers on its pledge to service US nuclear submarines from 2027, as his government scrambles to lock in support from Donald Trump on the $368bn AUKUS pact.
The Prime Minister on Friday will fly from Canberra on a critical one-week overseas trip that will bring him face to face with the President for the first time, amid concerns from the US that AUKUS will force it to deliver major funding and defence capabilities to a country that has not committed to support Washington in a conflict over Taiwan.
Ahead of Mr Albanese travelling to Fiji, the US and Canada, the Pentagon on Thursday announced a snap 30-day review of the AUKUS nuclear submarine deal, led by influential Defence Under Secretary for Policy, Elbridge Colby, who has expressed concerns about Australian defence spending and American industrial shipbuilding capacity.
As G7 leaders prepare to gather in the Canadian town of Kananaskis over the weekend amid rising tensions between the US and Iran, The Australian understands Mr Trump is yet to lock in any bilateral meetings with counterparts including Mr Albanese.
While the Prime Minister faces a backlash over so far resisting a concerted push from Washington to lift defence spending to 3.5 per cent of GDP, US government officials said they believed the meeting with Mr Trump was likely to proceed.
They told The Australian that, on top of the view Canberra should lift investment in defence, there was concern over giving submarines to a country that had not expressed willingness to join any conflict over Taiwan.
AUKUS had also always been considered “Australia’s idea”, with the need to justify the project resting firmly with Canberra, the sources said.
Defence Minister Richard Marles said he had known about the US AUKUS review “for some time” and welcomed it. Both the British and Australian governments had also conducted reviews into the defence pact. Mr Marles singled out Australia’s financial contributions to the American shipbuilding industrial base and said “AUKUS is under way right now … activities are happening under the banner of AUKUS”.
“We’re really confident about the progress of AUKUS and we’re confident about how it will proceed under the Trump Administration,” he said.
Former prime minister Scott Morrison, who hatched the AUKUS deal with Joe Biden and Boris Johnson in 2021, said the focus of the review was not new and “rightly centres on US submarine production rates”.
“This is a known and genuine challenge for the US industrial base,” Mr Morrison told Sky News. “This goes directly to the maintenance and expansion of the US submarine fleet, and it’s an area where Australia is already uniquely contributing under AUKUS Pillar I.
“I’ve known Elbridge for some years and he’s made observations in the past. He’s a pretty straight shooter in my experience. This is really about what can the US produce and how can they lift their own production capability and so they can meet their obligations that have been set out under AUKUS.”
Australian National University professor of international security and intelligence studies John Blaxland said Mr Colby had a “US-first, zero-sum approach to the submarine allocation”.
“For him, the question is – we can’t be 100 per cent sure that, in a conflict, Australia would be on our side – which is true,” Professor Blaxland told The Australian.
But he said “any self-respecting democracy” could not commit in advance to something that was outside the scope of its treaty obligations – in this case, the ANZUS alliance. “Taiwan is not in the treaty,” he said.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73643
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23174548 (140101ZJUN25) Notable: Give Trump ‘a new Pine Gap’, say experts claiming AUKUS go-slow - Slow progress on new submarine bases is fuelling calls to offer the US “another Pine Gap” in Western Australia, as defence and diplomatic heavyweights claim a lack of urgency on AUKUS is giving Americans reasons to doubt Australia’s seriousness about the pact. Defence analyst Michael Shoebridge and Yaron Finkelstein, who was chief adviser to former prime minister Scott Morrison when he signed up to the AUKUS pact, said the US had doubts about how much Australia valued the program. Shoebridge said AUKUS was a “gift to the Albanese government that let them wave this totem around” to demonstrate national security credentials at a time when Australia was spending “almost nothing” in the next 10 years and deferring big-spending decisions. Finkelstein, Morrison’s former principal private secretary, said the Biden administration also had concerns about what it perceived as Australian delays in pushing ahead with AUKUS. “There’s a bit of a legacy, a perception, about [whether] our heart is in it,” he said on Sky News. “They had a view that maybe we don’t want this as much as when we first started.” One solution Shoebridge and former Home Affairs chief Mike Pezzullo endorse is a joint submarine base in Australia. The prospect of a US submarine base in Australia is highly contentious, with union and Labor left figures arguing nuclear submarines are dangerous.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73634
>>73640
Give Trump ‘a new Pine Gap’, say experts claiming AUKUS go-slow
Paul Sakkal - June 12, 2025
1/2
Slow progress on new submarine bases is fuelling calls to offer the US “another Pine Gap” in Western Australia, as defence and diplomatic heavyweights claim a lack of urgency on AUKUS is giving Americans reasons to doubt Australia’s seriousness about the pact.
Defence analyst Michael Shoebridge and Yaron Finkelstein, who was chief adviser to former prime minister Scott Morrison when he signed up to the AUKUS pact, said the US had doubts about how much Australia valued the program.
Shoebridge said AUKUS was a “gift to the Albanese government that let them wave this totem around” to demonstrate national security credentials at a time when Australia was spending “almost nothing” in the next 10 years and deferring big-spending decisions.
Finkelstein, Morrison’s former principal private secretary, said the Biden administration also had concerns about what it perceived as Australian delays in pushing ahead with AUKUS.
“There’s a bit of a legacy, a perception, about [whether] our heart is in it,” he said on Sky News. “They had a view that maybe we don’t want this as much as when we first started.”
One solution Shoebridge and former Home Affairs chief Mike Pezzullo endorse is a joint submarine base in Australia.
The prospect of a US submarine base in Australia is highly contentious, with union and Labor left figures arguing nuclear submarines are dangerous.
South Coast Labour Council Secretary, Arthur Rorris, said on Thursday that AUKUS was “the most costly, dangerous and treacherous decision ever made by an Australian government in this space”.
AUKUS was announced in 2021, but the government has not picked a nuclear waste site or an east coast submarine base, and there are concerns about the speed of planning for a shipyard in Henderson, Western Australia.
Australia made the first of six $US500 million ($770 million) payments to boost the capacity of the US submarine industry earlier this year as part of the $368 billion deal, and has hosted visiting American vessels.
The US informed Australia about a 30-day review of the pact weeks ago, which became public on Thursday. Defence Minister Richard Marles said he welcomed the review. “It’s something which is perfectly natural for an incoming administration to do,” he said on the ABC.
Senior Australian government sources, not permitted to speak publicly, said the US stood to gain from AUKUS and believed the review might be designed to gain leverage as Washington pushed Australia to spend more on defence.
Former US ambassador Joe Hockey said bases should be expanded into locations at which the US could perform large volumes of submarine maintenance to help the US overturn a backlog crippling its ability to keep subs in operation.
“It would be enormously important to the Americans and allow for a significant increase in their capability and deterrence value in the region,” Hockey told this masthead. “Australia is lagging behind.”
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73644
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23174595 (140112ZJUN25) Notable: Video: Malcolm Turnbull wants Australia to invest in alternative defence capabilities as US reviews AUKUS agreement - Former prime minister Malcolm Turnbull says the Australian government is misinformed when it comes to the AUKUS deal and the United States' ability to provide nuclear submarines. Mr Turnbull, a longtime critic of the defence pact, claimed Defence Minister Richard Marles made an incorrect statement on 7.30, on the same day the US announced a review of the deal. Mr Marles said he was confident the US could increase its production capacity to two boats per year to honour the deal. "We need to get to that point in the early 2030s. That's the time frame," Mr Marles told 7.30. "Right now, we are confident that we can meet that. And we are seeing real progress." Mr Turnbull said Australia's defence minister was "misinformed". "Richard Marles said that the rate of production of Virginia-class submarines is increasing. That's not true," Mr Turnbull said. "The latest numbers given to the Congress by the navy on 11 March this year was that the rate of production is 1.1 per annum. They need to get to two by 2028 to be able to meet their own requirements, and to 2.33 to meet their own, plus Australia's. And they have not been able to lift production rates despite the expenditure of over $10 billion over the last six or seven years. So, they've got a real problem."
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73441
>>73634
>>73637
Malcolm Turnbull wants Australia to invest in alternative defence capabilities as US reviews AUKUS agreement
Paul Johnson - 12 Jun 2025
Former prime minister Malcolm Turnbull says the Australian government is misinformed when it comes to the AUKUS deal and the United States' ability to provide nuclear submarines.
Mr Turnbull, a longtime critic of the defence pact, claimed Defence Minister Richard Marles made an incorrect statement on 7.30, on the same day the US announced a review of the deal.
Mr Marles said he was confident the US could increase its production capacity to two boats per year to honour the deal.
"We need to get to that point in the early 2030s. That's the time frame," Mr Marles told 7.30.
"Right now, we are confident that we can meet that. And we are seeing real progress."
Mr Turnbull said Australia's defence minister was "misinformed".
"Richard Marles said that the rate of production of Virginia-class submarines is increasing. That's not true," Mr Turnbull said.
"The latest numbers given to the Congress by the navy on 11 March this year was that the rate of production is 1.1 per annum.
"They need to get to two by 2028 to be able to meet their own requirements, and to 2.33 to meet their own, plus Australia's.
"And they have not been able to lift production rates despite the expenditure of over $10 billion over the last six or seven years. So, they've got a real problem."
Mr Turnbull said it was unlikely that Elbridge Colby, who is leading the Pentagon's review, would say the US could spare the submarines even if they could increase their production capacity.
"They're short of submarines today," Mr Turnbull said.
"They're producing about half as many as they need to produce for their own needs. The competitive threat from China is increasing. And there is a risk of war imminently, according to [US Defence Secretary Pete] Hegseth, over Taiwan.
"I think that they'll conclude in the review that that question is either answered in the negative — they can't spare them — or they certainly won't be saying they can."
While Mr Marles has repeatedly called for calm and said the US strategic review was what any new administration would do, Mr Turnbull said the matter would only end in one nation's favour while President Donald Trump pursued an "America first" position.
"I'm sure they'd like to continue receiving the $3 billion, of which Richard's given them the first deposit," Mr Turnbull said.
"As to whether we get any submarines, that will be judged purely and solely in accordance with their legislation in America's interest. And it is America First. That's the Zeitgeist."
Morrison's 'great achievement'
There is speculation the US will use the review to squeeze Australia on defence spending.
Mr Marles told 7.30 that discussions and dialogue with the US remained open and he continued to push back on the suggestion Australia needed a 'plan B'.
"There is a plan here. We are sticking to it and we're going to deliver," he said. "Chopping and changing guarantees you will never have the capability."
But according to Mr Turnbull, Australia does need a plan B, with the current crop of Collins-class submarines nearing the end of their service life.
"It may be that it is too late. It may be that we end up with no submarines," he said, before firing a broadside at former prime minister Scott Morrison, who signed the AUKUS deal after scrapping a Turnbull government agreement for French submarines.
"That may be Scott's great achievement," he said.
"Let's assume that's the worst case.
"In that case, what we should be doing ... and this is certainly what's being canvassed by the Americans — we should be investing in alternatives.
"We could do the base, do the maintenance, leave the submarining to the Americans, and invest in other military capabilities that give us the ability to defend ourselves over a long range — long-range missiles, long-range bombers. Those capabilities."
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-06-12/turnbull-questions-marles-over-under-review-aukus-deal/105410774
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pMk_d5kyjyE
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73648
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23174623 (140116ZJUN25) Notable: Paul Keating is right, US AUKUS review might very well ‘save Australia from itself’ - "The Financial Times cited six sources on Wednesday reporting that US Under Secretary of Defense for Policy Elbridge Colby is leading a review of the AUKUS nuclear submarine deal with the UK and Australia to determine whether the US should scrap the project. The report noted that this move has triggered anxiety in Canberra. Some Australian media outlets were quick to respond with headlines like "not to worry" and "not a harbinger of collapse." The eagerness to defend the project instead made the anxiety quite obvious. However, other voices emerging from Australia have proven more compelling and harder to ignore. Australian former prime minister Paul Keating issued a statement on Thursday, saying that "the review makes clear that America keeps its national interests uppermost. But the concomitant question is: why has Australia failed to do the same?" Perhaps some organizations and individuals may express disappointment or even shock over the US review, but clear-headed Australians have likely breathed a quiet sigh of relief. For those anxious about the US review, this may also be an opportunity to confront the reality that Australia has always been the party paying the highest price with little gain in this deal. China certainly is not a fan of AUKUS, as it undermines peace and stability in the region. However, China is far from alone; many countries across the region have also voiced concerns or outright opposition to the pact." - Global Times - globaltimes.cn
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73560
>>73634
>>73636
Paul Keating is right, US AUKUS review might very well ‘save Australia from itself’
Global Times - Jun 12, 2025
The Financial Times cited six sources on Wednesday reporting that US Under Secretary of Defense for Policy Elbridge Colby is leading a review of the AUKUS nuclear submarine deal with the UK and Australia to determine whether the US should scrap the project. The report noted that this move has triggered anxiety in Canberra.
Some Australian media outlets were quick to respond with headlines like "not to worry" and "not a harbinger of collapse." The eagerness to defend the project instead made the anxiety quite obvious. However, other voices emerging from Australia have proven more compelling and harder to ignore.
Australian former prime minister Paul Keating issued a statement on Thursday, saying that "the review makes clear that America keeps its national interests uppermost. But the concomitant question is: why has Australia failed to do the same?" Another former prime minister Malcolm Turnbull said Australia should "wake up" and review the agreement itself. "The UK is conducting a review of AUKUS. The US department of defence is conducting a review of AUKUS. But Australia, which has the most at stake, has no review," he wrote on X on Thursday.
Such perspectives were echoed by some Australian netizens, one stated, "Let's hope the US DOES walk away from it," while another noted, "It would have been better if Australia terminate AUKUS as it demonstrates our sovereignty."
Perhaps some organizations and individuals may express disappointment or even shock over the US review, but clear-headed Australians have likely breathed a quiet sigh of relief. For those anxious about the US review, this may also be an opportunity to confront the reality that Australia has always been the party paying the highest price with little gain in this deal.
If the US abandons AUKUS, Australia's chances of obtaining submarines will remain unchanged - they were very unlikely to receive any anyway. In recent years, Australian observers have made it clear: Australia won't own AUKUS submarines but will instead host a US naval base with American-controlled submarines. This hollowing of Australia's autonomy is turning the country into a forward operating garrison for US global operations and future conflicts - offering no real security, only greater risk.
If the US does not walk away from AUKUS, the situation won't be any better. The core reason behind this review is that the US can no longer conceal a harsh reality: It's questionable whether its industrial capacity can produce enough submarines to sustain the project. Colby cautioned last year that submarines are a scare, critical commodity and the US industry couldn't produce enough to meet domestic demand. A Pentagon spokesperson also said the department was reviewing AUKUS to ensure that this initiative is aligned with "America First" agenda.
Some observers suggest following this review, the US is likely to demand more from Australia in the AUKUS project. Warwick Powell, an Australian scholar, told the Global Times, "Australian subimperial fealty is being tested. In an America First frame, the US is likely to demand more from Australia without providing any further guarantees."
He further stated that it's conceivable the US will first increase demands on financial contributions from Australia, and second, at best offer access to submarines captained by the US navy and based out of Australian ports. For critics of AUKUS, this would confirm Australia's abandonment of any pretense of national security autonomy and sovereignty.
Chen Hong, a professor and director of the Australian Studies Centre at East China Normal University, told the Global Times that Australia, as an island nation surrounded by ocean, enjoys a natural layer of security. In this context, advancing the AUKUS project amounts to planting the seeds of future military conflict - bringing risks not only to Australia itself but also to regional peace and stability. Moreover, given the current state of Australia's economy, it is hardly in a position to shoulder the enormous costs required to sustain such a project.
China certainly is not a fan of AUKUS, as it undermines peace and stability in the region. However, China is far from alone; many countries across the region have also voiced concerns or outright opposition to the pact.
After the Pentagon launched a review of the AUKUS nuclear submarine deal, Western media rushed to quote American politicians speculating that it would "be met with cheers in Beijing." Ultimately, some American politicians appear overly fixated on how China might react with a zero-sum mentality - while overlooking a more urgent question: How much credibility does the US still have as an ally and partner?
https://www.globaltimes.cn/page/202506/1336026.shtml
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73649
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23174845 (140204ZJUN25) Notable: PM’s meeting with Trump in doubt as Middle East conflict escalates - Anthony Albanese’s first face-to-face meeting with US President Donald Trump risks being derailed as Israeli strikes on Iran seize global attention ahead of a G7 summit in Canada. Albanese told Australians to avoid the region and pointed to new government advice not to travel to Israel and the occupied Palestinian territories as Iran prepared retaliatory strikes. Speaking in Fiji on Friday before heading to the United States and Canada, the prime minister warned of Iran’s nuclear program, but called for a diplomatic solution. “We, of course, are very conscious of the threat that Iran becoming a nuclear state would represent to peace and security in the region,” Albanese said on Friday. “We want to see these issues resolved through dialogue, and the United States has been playing an important role there.” Despite weeks of commentary about possible talks with Trump on tariffs and defence, a Trump-Albanese meeting had not been formally secured when the prime minister departed on Friday. Trump has not yet confirmed meetings with any world leaders at the G7, which begins on June 15, but Australia was confident it would secure an informal conversation on the sidelines or a bilateral meeting in Canada.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73631
>>73634
>>73640
PM’s meeting with Trump in doubt as Middle East conflict escalates
Paul Sakkal - June 13, 2025
1/2
Canberra/Nadi: Anthony Albanese’s first face-to-face meeting with US President Donald Trump risks being derailed as Israeli strikes on Iran seize global attention ahead of a G7 summit in Canada.
Albanese told Australians to avoid the region and pointed to new government advice not to travel to Israel and the occupied Palestinian territories as Iran prepared retaliatory strikes.
Speaking in Fiji on Friday before heading to the United States and Canada, the prime minister warned of Iran’s nuclear program, but called for a diplomatic solution.
“We, of course, are very conscious of the threat that Iran becoming a nuclear state would represent to peace and security in the region,” Albanese said on Friday.
“We want to see these issues resolved through dialogue, and the United States has been playing an important role there.”
Despite weeks of commentary about possible talks with Trump on tariffs and defence, a Trump-Albanese meeting had not been formally secured when the prime minister departed on Friday.
Trump has not yet confirmed meetings with any world leaders at the G7, which begins on June 15, but Australia was confident it would secure an informal conversation on the sidelines or a bilateral meeting in Canada.
Two Australian government sources familiar with planning for the trip said Australia had for several days contemplated if an Israel-Iran war, which had been foreshadowed for some time, might force Trump to skip the G7 meeting entirely. Trump is also managing a heated domestic row, which he has been widely accused of stoking, over protests in Los Angeles.
If the president does attend, according to the sources who asked for anonymity to discuss the thinking inside the government, his focus may be a long way from the Australia-US relationship.
The AUKUS submarine pact is in the spotlight ahead of the potential talks after the US Defence Department announced a snap 30-day review of the program. Labor ministers reacted calmly to the news and some privately believe it is a tool to leverage Australia to spend more on defence.
Albanese talked down the significance of the fresh US assessment of the landmark defence pact, echoing AUKUS architect and former prime minister Scott Morrison’s remarks on Thursday.
“The United States says an incoming government is having a review, just like the Australian government did … and just like the government of Keir Starmer in the United Kingdom,” the prime minister said.
“We are very confident, though, that AUKUS is in the interest of all three of our nations and that it will play an important role in peace, security and stability around the world.”
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73650
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23175018 (140240ZJUN25) Notable: COMMENTARY: Anthony Albanese’s ‘doublespeak’ no substitute for straight talk on defence - "The subtext of Anthony Albanese’s speech to the National Press Club could not have been louder if he had screamed it from the podium: the biggest threat to Australia is the contagion of American ideas. It was summed up in this sentence: “Australians voted against importing conflicts and ideologies that have no basis in our national culture or character.” Importing what conflicts and ideologies? From where? The religious hatred Iran and its proxies mobilise across the Middle East and export here? The tyrannical ideologies that China and Russia want to normalise and impose on this nation and the world? No. This statement was aimed squarely at the ideas the Prime Minister says Australians rejected at the election, the ones the Coalition stands accused of smuggling in from the US: culture wars and small government. Albanese’s theme was clear: Labor saved Australia from becoming a colonial outpost of Trumpian America. Albanese knows there are rich political fields to be ploughed here and all available evidence supports him. There are good reasons Canberra should differ with Washington, but with a president as mercurial and transactional as Trump this is a highwire act. There is also a hazard in dog-whistling disdain for the US President while downplaying the real and present danger posed by China’s Xi Jinping. Observers in Washington might have noted the tone Albanese adopted when asked whether he thought China was a national security threat. “I think that our engagement with the region and the world needs to be diplomatic, needs to be mature and needs to avoid the, you know, attempts to simplify what are a complex set of relationships,” Albanese said. Here the Prime Minister was at pains to de-escalate language, refusing to endorse the word “threat” when discussing Beijing." - Chris Uhlmann - theaustralian.com.au
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73560
>>73634
>>73640
COMMENTARY: Anthony Albanese’s ‘doublespeak’ no substitute for straight talk on defence
CHRIS UHLMANN - 14 June 2025
1/2
The subtext of Anthony Albanese’s speech to the National Press Club could not have been louder if he had screamed it from the podium: the biggest threat to Australia is the contagion of American ideas. It was summed up in this sentence: “Australians voted against importing conflicts and ideologies that have no basis in our national culture or character.”
Importing what conflicts and ideologies? From where? The religious hatred Iran and its proxies mobilise across the Middle East and export here? The tyrannical ideologies that China and Russia want to normalise and impose on this nation and the world?
No. This statement was aimed squarely at the ideas the Prime Minister says Australians rejected at the election, the ones the Coalition stands accused of smuggling in from the US: culture wars and small government.
“Australians voted against mass sackings in the public service and the damage that would do to our social safety net,” Albanese said. Here you are invited to conjure a crazy billionaire running amok with a chainsaw in Centrelink. This is apparently what the Coalition intended with its modest, botched, proposal that the number of federal public servants should be reduced through natural attrition and that the rest should be required to work from work.
Labor successfully poisoned this well by broadening the threat from federal employees to the entire workforce.
“Australians overwhelmingly rejected policies designed to drive down wages, undermine job security and take flexibility away from working families,” Albanese said.
Typically, the Coalition reacted like a kangaroo caught in the headlights of a road train. In the end, the only trace of the policy was a bloody smear on the tarmac and flyblown meat on the bull bar. The result? Everyone in politics now apparently agrees the federal public service carries no fat and the highest-paid bureaucrats on earth should never be pressed to ply their trade from the vast, expensive, purpose-built empty offices that litter Canberra.
Seriously, if the Liberal Party cannot campaign for smaller government at future elections, then maybe it is time to fold the tent.
But I digress.
Albanese’s theme was clear: Labor saved Australia from becoming a colonial outpost of Trumpian America. Albanese knows there are rich political fields to be ploughed here and all available evidence supports him.
An extract from the latest Lowy Institute Poll records Australians’ trust in the US fell by 20 points in a year, “with only 36 per cent of the public expressing any level of trust, a new low in two decades of Lowy Institute polling. Almost two-thirds of the public (64 per cent) say they hold ‘not very much’ trust (32 per cent) or no trust ‘at all’ (32 per cent) in the United States to act responsibly.”
This is an astounding vote of no confidence in our major ally, and the fault lies entirely with Donald Trump. But what is intriguing are the signals that Labor sees enduring opportunity in highlighting differences with the US for domestic political profit.
When challenged by the US Defence Secretary to lift defence spending, Albanese channelled his inner John Howard: “We’ll determine our defence policy.” When Australia joined four other nations in sanctioning two Israeli ministers for “inciting violence against Palestinians in the West Bank”, the Prime Minister described the furious response from Washington and Israel as “predictable, frankly”. In announcing the sanctions Foreign Minister Penny Wong made the perfectly reasonable observation that Australia and the US did not always walk in lock-step.
“The alliance is an alliance that is strong and that has stood the test of time through administrations and prime ministers, governments of different political persuasions,” she said. “From time to time we have differences of views.”
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73651
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23182420 (150915ZJUN25) Notable: Israel’s top diplomat clips Penny Wong for phoning Iranians - Israel’s ambassador to Australia has delivered a veiled barb to Foreign Minister Penny Wong and Western leaders pushing for diplomacy after she revealed she had phoned her Iranian counterpart urging restraint after Israel’s strikes on Iran. Wong has backed Israel’s right to defend itself against Iran’s nuclear program, the expansion of which earned a censure from the international nuclear watchdog before Israel launched an attack on Iran on Friday. Wong has also been dealing with Israeli officials since the conflict broke out. Many other Western leaders have made similar remarks urging diplomatic talks rather than more violence. But she has declined to explicitly endorse Israel’s military action, instead emphasising the need for diplomacy as tit-for-tat barrages continued. “This is precisely the same message I put to [Iranian foreign minister Abbas Araghchi]: that we urge restraint because whatever people’s views about what has occurred to date, what happens tomorrow matters to all peoples in the region,” Wong said on ABC’s Insiders on Sunday. “I directly put to the Iranian foreign minister, ‘We are saying to you, exercise restraint, return to diplomacy and dialogue because continuing to escalate this has consequences’.” Israeli ambassador Amir Maimon, a critic of Australia’s policies on the Middle East, latched onto Wong’s remarks about her call with Tehran, releasing his own statement about an hour after she spoke. The statement did not mention Wong by name but made reference to her calls for diplomacy and suggested such sentiments were unrealistic. “Iran isn’t hiding its intent, it declares it. And it’s building the weapons to fulfil it,” Maimon said. “Through its pursuit of nuclear arms, Iran has turned this into an asymmetric conflict, between a democracy seeking to defend itself and a regime bent on destruction. Yet some still urge diplomacy, as if words can stop warheads.”
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73631
>>73649
Israel’s top diplomat clips Penny Wong for phoning Iranians
Paul Sakkal - June 15, 2025
Israel’s ambassador to Australia has delivered a veiled barb to Foreign Minister Penny Wong and Western leaders pushing for diplomacy after she revealed she had phoned her Iranian counterpart urging restraint after Israel’s strikes on Iran.
Wong has backed Israel’s right to defend itself against Iran’s nuclear program, the expansion of which earned a censure from the international nuclear watchdog before Israel launched an attack on Iran on Friday. Wong has also been dealing with Israeli officials since the conflict broke out. Many other Western leaders have made similar remarks urging diplomatic talks rather than more violence.
But she has declined to explicitly endorse Israel’s military action, instead emphasising the need for diplomacy as tit-for-tat barrages continued.
“This is precisely the same message I put to [Iranian foreign minister Abbas Araghchi]: that we urge restraint because whatever people’s views about what has occurred to date, what happens tomorrow matters to all peoples in the region,” Wong said on ABC’s Insiders on Sunday.
“I directly put to the Iranian foreign minister, ‘We are saying to you, exercise restraint, return to diplomacy and dialogue because continuing to escalate this has consequences’.”
Iran has been increasingly co-operating with a group of authoritarian nations threatening Western hegemony, including China, Russia and North Korea. The theocratic state funds proxy outfits Hamas in Gaza, Hezbollah in Lebanon and the Houthis in Yemen to help bring about its stated aim of damaging Israel.
Despite this, Australia maintains diplomatic ties with Iran, unlike the United States, so that Australian officials can deliver messages from allies, including warnings. The Albanese government – as it faced criticism from pro-Israel groups for not siding strongly enough with Israel over the Gaza war – was pressured by the Coalition to expel the Iranian ambassador last year over his violent statements about Israel. Many European nations also have diplomatic relations with Iran.
Israeli ambassador Amir Maimon, a critic of Australia’s policies on the Middle East, latched onto Wong’s remarks about her call with Tehran, releasing his own statement about an hour after she spoke. The statement did not mention Wong by name but made reference to her calls for diplomacy and suggested such sentiments were unrealistic.
“Iran isn’t hiding its intent, it declares it. And it’s building the weapons to fulfil it,” Maimon said.
“Through its pursuit of nuclear arms, Iran has turned this into an asymmetric conflict, between a democracy seeking to defend itself and a regime bent on destruction.”
“Yet some still urge diplomacy, as if words can stop warheads.”
Wong has also been engaging with the Israeli embassy in Canberra. She had a call with the Israeli foreign minister scheduled for Friday, but it was postponed; both sides are working to reschedule.
The Iranian foreign ministry released a statement about its call with Wong on social media. The readout appeared to give the impression that Wong was critical of Israel’s actions, but it omitted her public statements about Iran’s nuclear program, the threat it posed to world peace, and Israel’s right to defend itself.
“The Australian foreign minister voiced deep regret and serious concern over the escalation of tensions in the region,” the Iranian statement said.
“Wong stressed that such developments risk further regional destabilisation. She also urged all sides to refrain from actions that risk escalating tensions.”
In the same ABC interview, Wong emphasised Israel’s entitlement to keep itself safe from the threat of Iran but declined to explicitly endorse the Netanyahu government’s military action.
“Well, Israel has a right to self-defence. It does have a right to self-defence,” she said.
“But the question here is not a legal proposition, the question here is what do we do now? We know Iran is a threat. We know that its nuclear program poses a threat to international peace and obviously to Israel.
“And how do we respond in a way that lessens the risk of more civilians ... being brought into this conflict?”
Prime Minister Anthony Albanese advised Australians to follow government advice to avoid travel to Israel or occupied territories.
“Australia does not play a role in this military conflict. I wouldn’t expect that there would be a request for Australia to play a military role, but we will continue to play a role in terms of looking after Australian citizens,” he said from Seattle on the way to a G7 summit in Canada.
https://www.theage.com.au/politics/federal/israel-s-top-diplomat-clips-penny-wong-for-phoning-iranians-20250615-p5m7ir.html
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73652
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23182429 (150926ZJUN25) Notable: Nationals oppose Liberals’ Hobart AFL stadium to win Tasmania seats, open to ex-JLN MPs - The Nationals - seeking to “take Tasmania by storm” at the state election – have joined the Greens in vowing to kill Hobart’s “irresponsible” Macquarie Point AFL stadium. Seeking to re-establish the party in the decentralised island state, after six years without an elected representative, the Nationals on Thursday announced they would stand candidates in three of the five multi-member electorates. The Nationals’ vow to ditch the $1bn stadium - championed by the minority Liberal government – gives anti-stadium voters in those seats an alternative to the Greens, with Labor and the Liberals standing by the project. Nationals Senate leader Bridget McKenzie, in Tasmania to kickstart her party’s campaign, denied the stadium stance was disloyal to her national Coalition partner. “We are not a faction of the Australian Liberal Party,” Senator McKenzie told The Australian. She said voters in Bass, Braddon and Lyons who did not want the stadium but did not want to vote for the Greens or independents now had another, less destabilising option. “We are not a party of protest like the Greens, like other minor parties … we are a party of government and have a very responsible approach to the work of representation, to fiscal responsibility,” she said.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73639
Nationals oppose Liberals’ Hobart AFL stadium to win Tasmania seats, open to ex-JLN MPs
MATTHEW DENHOLM - June 12, 2025
The Nationals – seeking to “take Tasmania by storm” at the state election – have joined the Greens in vowing to kill Hobart’s “irresponsible” Macquarie Point AFL stadium.
Seeking to re-establish the party in the decentralised island state, after six years without an elected representative, the Nationals on Thursday announced they would stand candidates in three of the five multi-member electorates.
The Nationals’ vow to ditch the $1bn stadium – championed by the minority Liberal government – gives anti-stadium voters in those seats an alternative to the Greens, with Labor and the Liberals standing by the project.
Nationals Senate leader Bridget McKenzie, in Tasmania to kickstart her party’s campaign, denied the stadium stance was disloyal to her national Coalition partner.
“We are not a faction of the Australian Liberal Party,” Senator McKenzie told The Australian.
She said voters in Bass, Braddon and Lyons who did not want the stadium but did not want to vote for the Greens or independents now had another, less destabilising option.
“We are not a party of protest like the Greens, like other minor parties … we are a party of government and have a very responsible approach to the work of representation, to fiscal responsibility,” she said.
“When it comes to the stadia, the policy developed by the Tasmanian Nationals is because they care about the state of the state budget and the (debt-related) intergeneration issues.
“You’ve got a $1bn project proposal which the state of the state budget would indicate would be an irresponsible decision at this time. The Tasmanian Nationals 100 per cent support an AFL team but they do not support a Macquarie Point stadium. That is a clear point of difference.”
The party has called for candidate nominations and is not ruling out embracing former Jacqui Lambie Network sitting MPs Andrew Jenner, Rebekah Pentland and Miriam Beswick.
“The National Party in Tasmania welcomes everyone to join and nominations are open,” Senator McKenzie said, adding the ex-JLN MPs would have to follow the party’s normal process: “Be part of this political movement that we hope is going to take Tasmania by storm.”
Her party had a history in Tasmania dating back to 1920 when William McWilliams became the first leader of the Federal Country Party. Its last Tasmanian elected representative was former senator Steve Martin, who lost his seat in 2019.
“This is a state we’ve always felt is a natural fit for the National Party – key industries like ag, fishing, forestry and mining are our bread and butter,” Senator McKenzie said.
The Greens, hoping to build on their five seats in the 35-seat Assembly, are also focusing their campaign on the stadium, a condition of the Tasmania Devils’ entry to the AFL. “This election is an opportunity to put a stop to it once and for all,” said Greens leader, Rosalie Woodruff.
With Labor and Liberal both backing the stadium and a recent opinion poll showing 57 per cent of Tasmanians oppose its fast-track through parliament, the issue could send voters into the arms of independents and minor parties.
Peter George, an anti-salmon candidate who gave Labor a scare in the seat of Franklin in the federal election and is standing for the mirror state seat, added his voice in opposition to the stadium.
Tasmania, going to the polls on July 19 for the second time in 16 months because of a no-confidence motion in Premier Jeremy Rockliff, has five electorates each returning seven MPs.
https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/nationals-oppose-liberals-hobart-afl-stadium-to-win-tasmania-seats-open-to-exjln-mps/news-story/a57fa8f346caeda94e21006008f46171
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73653
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23182448 (150937ZJUN25) Notable: ‘Pillar 1 problematic, Pillar 2 great’: Inside Colby’s AUKUS mind - If US Under-Secretary of Defence for Policy Elbridge Colby’s personal views on AUKUS come to fruition, then Australia’s largest ever military project won’t be happening in its current form. A review is now being conducted by the Pentagon so it’s wait and see, but in a long interview conducted with Mr Colby just before he was hand-picked by Donald Trump for the Pentagon, he conveyed his view on the two pillars of AUKUS, approved by Congress, and subject to Presidential authority. “Pillar I is very problematic, Pillar II is great, no problem,” Colby said. Pillar I involves the US selling nuclear-powered submarines to Australia in the early 2030s. Pillar II is about other military intelligence sharing including the development of artificial intelligence. Colby scuttled several positive takes I posed about the sale of nuclear submarines to Australia. “How are we supposed to give away nuclear attack submarines in the years of the window of potential conflict with China?” he asked me back. “A nuclear attack submarine is the most important asset for a western Pacific fight, for Taiwan, conventionally. But we don’t have enough, and we’re not going to have enough,” Colby said. America is nowhere near producing enough of its own submarines. so why would they sell any to Australia?
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73634
‘Pillar 1 problematic, Pillar 2 great’: Inside Colby’s AUKUS mind
MATTHEW CRANSTON - June 12, 2025
If US Under-Secretary of Defence for Policy Elbridge Colby’s personal views on AUKUS come to fruition, then Australia’s largest ever military project won’t be happening in its current form.
A review is now being conducted by the Pentagon so it’s wait and see, but in a long interview conducted with Mr Colby just before he was hand-picked by Donald Trump for the Pentagon, he conveyed his view on the two pillars of AUKUS, approved by Congress, and subject to Presidential authority.
“Pillar I is very problematic, Pillar II is great, no problem,” Colby said.
Pillar I involves the US selling nuclear-powered submarines to Australia in the early 2030s.
Pillar II is about other military intelligence sharing including the development of artificial intelligence.
Colby scuttled several positive takes I posed about the sale of nuclear submarines to Australia.
“How are we supposed to give away nuclear attack submarines in the years of the window of potential conflict with China?” he asked me back.
“A nuclear attack submarine is the most important asset for a western Pacific fight, for Taiwan, conventionally. But we don’t have enough, and we’re not going to have enough,” Colby said.
America is nowhere near producing enough of its own submarines. so why would they sell any to Australia?
In just four years following the attack on Pearl Harbour, the United States built 273, albeit significantly less sophisticated, diesel-powered subs. Today, it’s barely producing two nuclear submarines per year.
“We are in what’s called a submarine bathtub. We have way too few attack submarines for what we need as a nation,” Colby said.
What about the fact that having a few submarines under the command of an ally like Australia, which can create a strategic ambiguity for China’s People’s Liberation Navy is a positive?
“A green asset is an ally. But there’s nothing like a blue asset. Blue means it’s ours,” Colby said, “As long as they’re under our command at the end of the day when the balloon goes up, because we need to know that.”
What about jointly crewed?
“If it’s 50-50, that’s not enough,” he said.
Surely there is strategic benefit in having a few submarines ready in the South Pacific rather than moored in San Diego?
That’s not that big an advantage either, apparently.
For Colby, the whole of AUKUS is viewed through practical priorities.
I asked him to explain this in the context of Trump’s America First strategy.
“America First has baggage, but it's a more business-like approach,” Colby said. America, he said, was divided into three camps when it comes to military strategy.
“You have the primacists – or the neo-conservatives – that are traditional like the Mitch McConnell types, then you have on the other side, the restrainers, who are more inward looking (think the Tucker Carlson of America) and then there are people like me, we are more in the middle, the prioritisers,” he said.
“Americans need to understand that we have constrained resources. We’re facing a pure superpower for the first time in our history. And really, there are serious fiscal problems where you can’t run the Reagan playbook when you got 100 per cent debt to GDP ratio.”
So what about the fact that Australia has promised to contribute $4bn to help America build its submarine industrial base and, on top of that, pay billions of dollars per submarine purchased from the US?
Australia has also already made the first $500m payment to the US under AUKUS, when Defence Minister and Deputy Prime Minister Richard Marles met with his US counterpart in February.
“The key thing for Australia, if it were up to me, and I don’t make any predictions about my role, is that we need to understand we have constrained resources,” Colby said before being appointed to his current position.
There is a lot to read into statement, particularly given the request made earlier this month by US Secretary of Defence Pete Hegseth for Australia to lift defence spending to 3.5 per cent of GDP.
Former US Secretary of the Navy Richard Spencer was asked on Thursday if Colby’s scepticism worried him.
“No, I have great respect for Elbridge Colby’s intellectual capability to analyse situations,” he said.
“There should be people back testing and asking questions as we go forward, because things are going to change.”
Colby’s personal views before Trump’s appointment of him are one thing, but being inside the Trump administration is another.
This whole review into AUKUS might turn out to be just another bargaining chip with Australia on tariffs – another test for Trump’s so-called ‘art of the deal’.
https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/defence/pillar-1-problematic-pillar-2-great-inside-colbys-aukus-mind/news-story/55fc5c2451c18aeb3f814857fd62dd8f
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73654
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23182456 (150940ZJUN25) Notable: Amazon boosts Australian data centre investment to $20bn as Albanese visits Seattle - US global tech giant Amazon will pump $20bn into Australia over five years to expand its data centre network, cloud infrastructure and energy generation, including new investment in three solar farms across Victoria and Queensland. Amazon Web Services chief executive Matt Garman - who leads the company’s cloud, data centre and artificial intelligence business – said the funding pledge out to 2029 was the “largest investment ever announced by a global technology provider in Australia”. The $20bn AWS commitment, which incorporates prior funding pledges made by the company, includes expansions of Amazon’s data centres in Sydney and Melbourne, and investment in three new solar projects. The solar farms will be delivered by European Energy, with Amazon committing to purchase a combined capacity of more than 170MW. Amazon already has investments in eight solar and wind projects in Victoria, Queensland and NSW, which help power AWS operations including data and fulfilment centres. Mr Garman said once all 11 renewable energy projects are up-and-running, they will generate more than 1.4 million megawatt hours of emissions-friendly power annually. Mr Albanese said the Amazon investment represents “an exciting opportunity for Australia to build AI capability using secure, resilient infrastructure”. With the Albanese government positioning productivity as a top economic priority during its second term, the Prime Minister said the AWS expansion plans were “exactly the kind of economic investment in our nation that we want to see, and creates opportunities for continued innovation and growth”.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Amazon boosts Australian data centre investment to $20bn as Albanese visits Seattle
GEOFF CHAMBERS - 15 June 2025
1/2
US global tech giant Amazon will pump $20bn into Australia over five years to expand its data centre network, cloud infrastructure and energy generation, including new investment in three solar farms across Victoria and Queensland.
Amazon Web Services chief executive Matt Garman – who leads the company’s cloud, data centre and artificial intelligence business – said the funding pledge out to 2029 was the “largest investment ever announced by a global technology provider in Australia”.
Standing alongside Anthony Albanese at Amazon’s Seattle headquarters on Sunday (AEST), Mr Garman was asked whether nuclear power would be required over the long-term to ensure energy-intensive data centres can sustainably harness the full power of AI.
With competitors including Microsoft and Google directing major funding and resources into nuclear Small Modular Reactors, Mr Garman has repeatedly outlined the importance of nuclear energy in supporting AI development since becoming AWS chief executive in June last year.
After signing agreements last year to support the development of SMRs, Mr Garman declared that nuclear is a “safe source of carbon-free energy that can help power our operations and meet the growing demands of our customers”.
Mr Garman, who recently urged British authorities to ramp up nuclear generation alongside renewables to help power the data centres needed for developing artificial intelligence, on Sunday said it was definitely the case that “the explosion of AI requires a lot of power”.
“That’s one of the things we’re thinking about. Here in the United States, we see nuclear as part of that portfolio. I think depending on the local set-up and economies and other things, it’s a global question, but there’s no question that we will continue to need more and more power going forward,” Mr Garman said.
“It’s an important thing that we spend a lot of time on. But it depends on which source of power we choose. Sometimes it’s renewables sources, sometimes it’s hydro.
“From a technology perspective, Australia is incredibly important and a great market for us. From an energy perspective, it’s a portfolio approach for us and I don’t think any one technology is right for every situation.”
The $20bn AWS commitment, which incorporates prior funding pledges made by the company, includes expansions of Amazon’s data centres in Sydney and Melbourne, and investment in three new solar projects. The solar farms will be delivered by European Energy, with Amazon committing to purchase a combined capacity of more than 170MW.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73655
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23182504 (150956ZJUN25) Notable: Video: PM locks in meeting with Trump to discuss AUKUS, tariffs - Anthony Albanese will meet Donald Trump on the sidelines of the G7 summit to discuss the long-term future of the $368bn AUKUS deal, the strategic importance of the US-Australia relationship in the Indo-Pacific and why Australian companies should be exempt from the US President’s tariffs. The Prime Minister on Sunday (AEST) confirmed he would hold formal bilateral talks with Mr Trump at the Kananaskis summit in Alberta, where leaders of the world’s most powerful western democracies will gather in the next 24-hours under the backdrop of wars in the Middle East and Ukraine. Mr Albanese, who has spoken three times with the US President since his return to the White House, said while Mr Trump was dealing with major global and domestic issues he expected to have a “constructive engagement” with him. The meeting is expected to occur overnight Tuesday (AEST). “Obviously we will raise tariffs, we will raise the importance of AUKUS. And we will have a discussion as two friends should,” Mr Albanese said. Under pressure from US officials for Australia to urgently lift its defence spending to 3.5 per cent of GDP, Mr Albanese said the context of his AUKUS discussions would centre around what Australia contributes and the potential of the military pact in terms of benefits for the US.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73634
>>73649
>>73654
PM locks in meeting with Trump to discuss AUKUS, tariffs
GEOFF CHAMBERS - 15 June 2025
1/2
Anthony Albanese will meet Donald Trump on the sidelines of the G7 summit to discuss the long-term future of the $368bn AUKUS deal, the strategic importance of the US-Australia relationship in the Indo-Pacific and why Australian companies should be exempt from the US President’s tariffs.
The Prime Minister on Sunday (AEST) confirmed he would hold formal bilateral talks with Mr Trump at the Kananaskis summit in Alberta, where leaders of the world’s most powerful western democracies will gather in the next 24-hours under the backdrop of wars in the Middle East and Ukraine.
Speaking at the Amazon headquarters, where AWS chief executive Matt Garman announced a $20bn investment over four-years in Australian data centres and renewables projects, Mr Albanese said a meeting with Mr Trump had been locked-in.
Mr Albanese, who has spoken three times with the US President since his return to the White House, said while Mr Trump was dealing with major global and domestic issues he expected to have a “constructive engagement” with him. The meeting is expected to occur overnight Tuesday (AEST).
“Obviously we will raise tariffs, we will raise the importance of AUKUS. And we will have a discussion as two friends should,” Mr Albanese said.
Under pressure from US officials for Australia to urgently lift its defence spending to 3.5 per cent of GDP, Mr Albanese said the context of his AUKUS discussions would centre around what Australia contributes and the potential of the military pact in terms of benefits for the US.
After the Pentagon last week ordered a snap 30-day review into the AUKUS nuclear submarine agreement, Mr Albanese said he would reiterate to Mr Trump the significant strategic outcomes the deal presents. These include Australia’s substantial financial assistance for the US industrial capability, of which the government has already contributed $500m.
“Australia has currently over 100 personnel in Hawaii, working on (nuclear submarine) maintenance, working on skills and contributing there. As well as many more people here in the United States,” Mr Albanese said.
“The potential of what’s going to occur, the infrastructure investment at Henderson (shipyards) will be important in increasing the capacity of US submarines, as well as UK submarines, to be in the water for longer and for maintenance to occur there.
“The benefit that the presence of US Marines has in the Northern Territory is also important, as well as the fuel reserves that are there in the Northern Territory. There are a range of ways in which Australia’s contribution to the United States, not just through AUKUS pillar one.”
Asked about the ideal outcome of negotiations on a tariffs deal, Mr Albanese said the 10 per cent baseline tariff announced by Mr Trump earlier in the year was applied across the board. He refused to pre-empt outcomes before the meeting takes place.
“I will put forward Australia’s interests respectfully because it’s also in the interests of the United States for Australia to be treated appropriately. Tariffs across the board, of course, impose an increased cost on the purchases of those goods and services.”
“Those goods and services have still been provided here in the United States, and indeed in some sectors. If you look at the beef sector, Australian beef producers have been able to find export destinations as well.
“I will enter into those discussions constructively. The discussions that were previously had with President Trump were constructive, but those 10 per cent tariffs, of course, have been the minimum … that have been applied right across the board.”
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73656
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23186828 (160930ZJUN25) Notable: Defence ties with Australia key to Albanese’s pitch in historic Trump meeting - Anthony Albanese will stare down Donald Trump’s demands for Australia to double its defence spending, but reassure the president the country is a trustworthy partner in the strategic contest with China as the prime minister works to safeguard the AUKUS pact. In a meeting with Trump this week that looms as among the most important of his three decades in politics, Albanese will put access to Australia’s critical minerals on the table as the Trump administration reviews whether AUKUS fits with its “America First” agenda. Asked whether Australia would stand shoulder-to-shoulder with the US if China attempted to take Taiwan by force - a source of some concern in some parts of the Trump administration – Albanese did not answer directly on Monday. But the prime minister said AUKUS would play a key peace and security role. “Australia’s a trusted partner to promote peace and security in our region,” Albanese said. “We have been so forever. If you look at the role that Australia has played, [we] will continue to play an important role in the Pacific. The visit that I had on the way here to Fiji is another example and a reminder of the fact that Australia is a trusted partner in the Pacific.”
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73634
>>73655
Defence ties with Australia key to Albanese’s pitch in historic Trump meeting
James Massola - June 16, 2025
1/2
Calgary: Anthony Albanese will stare down Donald Trump’s demands for Australia to double its defence spending, but reassure the president the country is a trustworthy partner in the strategic contest with China as the prime minister works to safeguard the AUKUS pact.
In a meeting with Trump this week that looms as among the most important of his three decades in politics, Albanese will put access to Australia’s critical minerals on the table as the Trump administration reviews whether AUKUS fits with its “America First” agenda.
Asked whether Australia would stand shoulder-to-shoulder with the US if China attempted to take Taiwan by force – a source of some concern in some parts of the Trump administration – Albanese did not answer directly on Monday.
But the prime minister said AUKUS would play a key peace and security role.
“Australia’s a trusted partner to promote peace and security in our region,” Albanese said. “We have been so forever. If you look at the role that Australia has played, [we] will continue to play an important role in the Pacific. The visit that I had on the way here to Fiji is another example and a reminder of the fact that Australia is a trusted partner in the Pacific.”
Trump and Albanese’s first face-to-face meeting, which will take place against a backdrop of the Russia-Ukraine war and the Iran-Israel missile strikes, is scheduled for the early hours of Wednesday morning, Australian time, on the sidelines of the G7 summit in Canada.
Australian officials said that anything more than 20 minutes would be regarded as a win within the government after Trump used other meetings with world leaders to stage made-for-TV clashes.
Fresh from a meeting with Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney, another world leader who benefited electorally from distancing himself from the US president, Albanese said that he defined success with Trump as being able to argue Australia’s case.
“I don’t want to preempt outcomes of meetings [but] a successful meeting is one where we are able ... to put forward our position,” Albanese said on Sunday, local time.
Australian officials, unauthorised to speak publicly, expect Trump to raise the issue of collective security against China’s rapidly expanding military and ask for more defence spending. Australia spends about 2 per cent of GDP on defence and is on track to increase to 2.3 per cent.
US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth recently said his country wanted Australia to raise spending by about $40 billion per year to about 3.5 per cent.
Albanese has pushed back against that call, arguing Australian defence spending has increased significantly on his watch and that the nation wouldn’t set an arbitrary target before choosing how to spend the extra money.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73657
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23186845 (160945ZJUN25) Notable: Albanese faces Labor dissent over Amazon’s access to government contracts - Anthony Albanese is facing internal dissent over Amazon’s access to lucrative public contracts, with NSW Labor senator Tony Sheldon calling for the tech giant to be barred from receiving such work, while three ministers are among at least 17 government MPs who have accused the company of exploiting its workers. With the Prime Minister on Saturday (Sunday AEST) visiting the Seattle headquarters of the company’s cloud computing subsidiary Amazon Web Services, fellow NSW Right senator Deb O’Neill backed using government procuring power to hold the company accountable. Senator O’Neill, who enjoys the backing of the Shop, Distributive and Allied Employees Association (SDA) - a longstanding critic of Amazon’s approach to workplace practices – has similarly implored the government to use its buying power to “hold Amazon to account”. Late last year, she criticised the multinational for being “anti-worker and fiercely anti-union”, while claiming it had engaged in “countless examples of calculated exploitation” of its workforce. She has accused the company of acting as a “champion tax dodger” and argued that lucrative government contracts had helped “power the Amazon behemoth and keep its practices going.” In response to questions about those remarks, Senator O’Neill said: “I stand by my previous comments.”
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73654
Albanese faces Labor dissent over Amazon’s access to government contracts
JACK QUAIL - 15 June 2025
1/2
Anthony Albanese is facing internal dissent over Amazon’s access to lucrative public contracts, with NSW Labor senator Tony Sheldon calling for the tech giant to be barred from receiving such work, while three ministers are among at least 17 government MPs who have accused the company of exploiting its workers.
With the Prime Minister on Saturday (Sunday AEST) visiting the Seattle headquarters of the company’s cloud computing subsidiary Amazon Web Services, fellow NSW Right senator Deb O’Neill backed using government procuring power to hold the company accountable.
The multinational has also been condemned by a host of Labor MPs including Helen Polley, Tania Lawrence, Matt Burnell, Cassandra Fernando, Marielle Smith, Luke Gosling, Raff Ciccone, Dave Smith, Jana Stewart, Varun Ghosh and Glenn Sterle, who have accused the firm of undermining labour laws and employing tax avoidance tactics.
Amazon has also been criticised in federal parliament by Assistant Treasurer Daniel Mulino, Aged Care and Seniors Minister Sam Rae, as well as Assistant Resources Minister Anthony Chisholm.
In recent years, Amazon has emerged as a key recipient of government contracts, with AWS securing work with the Australian Taxation Office, CSIRO, Treasury, and the Department of Defence – including a $2bn agreement to develop and operate top-secret data centres in partnership with national security agencies.
Despite criticism from within Labor, Mr Albanese met with AWS chief executive Matt Garman at the weekend, where he witnessed a new $7bn funding pledge by the tech giant to help support the booming demand for artificial intelligence in Australia.
The commitment will support the expansion of its data centre networks in Sydney and Melbourne and underwrite solar farms in Victoria and Queensland to meet its energy demands.
Mr Albanese’s office declined to comment on Sunday when asked about criticism of Amazon within Labor’s ranks.
The internal disquiet over Amazon comes as Communication Minister Anika Wells is set to sign off on one of the biggest federal government contracts with the company – a deal with the National Broadband Network to deliver satellite internet services to the bush.
Under the agreement, expected to total hundreds of millions of dollars, Amazon subsidiary Kuiper Systems will provide low-latency internet access to the NBN’s rural and remote customers via its constellation of 3000 low-Earth orbit satellites.
Neither Ms Wells – who in 2021 accused Amazon of employing an “exploitative model” in its on-demand delivery arm Amazon Flex – nor the NBN responded to a request for comment.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73658
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23186849 (160954ZJUN25) Notable: Hundreds of Australians seek help to leave Israel and Iran - Several hundred Australians have registered interest in leaving Israel and Iran amid escalating hostilities between the two countries, but have been advised to shelter where they are while airspace remains closed. Foreign Minister Penny Wong said 300 Australians had advised the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade (DFAT) of their desire to leave Israel, and 350 Australians had done so for Iran, with more registrations expected. Senator Wong said that while no flights are possible yet given the risk of missile strikes on civilian aircraft, the government was working on "a range of plans" to help people leave when safe. "I understand how concerned, how distressed many Australians are about what is occurring. I understand how particularly those who are in the Middle East, in Israel or Iran, how worrying this situation is, and how frightening it is," she told reporters on Monday. At least 224 people have been killed in Iran and 13 in Israel after several days of strikes. The episode began on Friday, local time, with an Israeli strike on Iran which Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said was an attempt to destroy nuclear facilities behind what he said would be an "existential threat to Israel". It came shortly after the UN nuclear watchdog concluded Iran was in violation of its obligations under the global non-proliferation treaty, and shortly before planned talks with the United States.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73631
>>73649
>>73651
Hundreds of Australians seek help to leave Israel and Iran
Tom Crowley - 16 June 2025
Several hundred Australians have registered interest in leaving Israel and Iran amid escalating hostilities between the two countries, but have been advised to shelter where they are while airspace remains closed.
Foreign Minister Penny Wong said 300 Australians had advised the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade (DFAT) of their desire to leave Israel, and 350 Australians had done so for Iran, with more registrations expected.
Senator Wong said that while no flights are possible yet given the risk of missile strikes on civilian aircraft, the government was working on "a range of plans" to help people leave when safe.
"I understand how concerned, how distressed many Australians are about what is occurring. I understand how particularly those who are in the Middle East, in Israel or Iran, how worrying this situation is, and how frightening it is," she told reporters on Monday.
At least 224 people have been killed in Iran and 13 in Israel after several days of strikes.
The episode began on Friday, local time, with an Israeli strike on Iran which Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said was an attempt to destroy nuclear facilities behind what he said would be an "existential threat to Israel".
It came shortly after the UN nuclear watchdog concluded Iran was in violation of its obligations under the global non-proliferation treaty, and shortly before planned talks with the United States.
Wong repeats calls for de-escalation
Senator Wong repeated calls for "de-escalation", a view she said she had conveyed to her counterparts in both countries and was shared by the UK, Canada and France, and was "consistent with what President Trump has said".
"No-one doubts the threat Iran poses, we have long been speaking about this as an international community," she said.
"But what I would say is we don't want to see an escalation which leads to … dire consequences for the people of the region."
Australian citizens, permanent residents and family members with entry rights are eligible to register their interest in an assisted departure with DFAT and are encouraged to do so on the official Smartraveller website.
That website also provides up-to-date official guidance for those who are in Israel or Iran. The government currently advises people to listen to local authorities, who are telling residents to shelter in place. It also advises those outside Israel and Iran to not travel there.
"Obviously that is a very difficult thing to say to people but that is the advice that we have," she said.
Earlier, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese echoed calls for de-escalation.
"I have expressed before our concern about Iran gaining the capacity of nuclear weapons as something that is a threat to security in the region. But we, along with other like-minded countries, do want to see that priority on dialogue and diplomacy," he told reporters in Canada, where he is attending a G7 summit.
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-06-16/australians-seek-help-to-leave-israel-and-iran/105422940
https://www.smartraveller.gov.au/news-and-updates/conflict-middle-east
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73659
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23186853 (161005ZJUN25) Notable: USS America, USS San Diego, USS Rushmore arrive in Sydney with 31st Marines - The US Navy amphibious assault ship USS America has arrived in Sydney during a routine stop for troops from the 31st Marine Expeditionary Unit. The flagship of the America Strike Group brings more than 2,500 sailors and marines to Sydney under a US scheduled port visit from 14 June. The ship brings significant capabilities to the region, including a detachment of Marine Fighter Attack Squadron (VMFA) 242, equipped with the advanced F-35B Lightning II aircraft. “Sydney’s warm welcome has been exceptional,” according to USS America Commanding Officer Captain Ethan Rule. “This port visit provides a valuable opportunity to strengthen the bonds between our nations, experience Australia’s unique culture, and reinforce our shared values.” Royal Australian Navy Liaison Officer, LCDR Craig Hamilton is currently serving aboard USS America with the mission of fostering seamless cooperation and interoperability between the two navies. He will host Australian military and government officials for a tour of the ship, highlighting its capabilities and the close partnership between the US and Australia. “The US-Australia alliance is a cornerstone of peace and stability in the Indo-Pacific,” said Erika Olson, chargé d’affaires, US mission to Australia. “The arrival of America, USS San Diego and USS Rushmore marks the first time that the three-ship America Strike Group are together in Sydney. We are excited to have sailors and marines here, and warmly welcome them to Sydney.” America, San Diego, and Rushmore are part of the America Strike group, which is capable of responding to a range of military operations, including combat operations and humanitarian assistance and disaster response.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73432
>>73587
USS America, USS San Diego, USS Rushmore arrive in Sydney with 31st Marines
Robert Dougherty - 16 JUNE 2025
The US Navy amphibious assault ship USS America has arrived in Sydney during a routine stop for troops from the 31st Marine Expeditionary Unit.
The flagship of the America Strike Group brings more than 2,500 sailors and marines to Sydney under a US scheduled port visit from 14 June.
The ship brings significant capabilities to the region, including a detachment of Marine Fighter Attack Squadron (VMFA) 242, equipped with the advanced F-35B Lightning II aircraft.
“Sydney’s warm welcome has been exceptional,” according to USS America Commanding Officer Captain Ethan Rule.
“This port visit provides a valuable opportunity to strengthen the bonds between our nations, experience Australia’s unique culture, and reinforce our shared values.”
Royal Australian Navy Liaison Officer, LCDR Craig Hamilton is currently serving aboard USS America with the mission of fostering seamless cooperation and interoperability between the two navies.
He will host Australian military and government officials for a tour of the ship, highlighting its capabilities and the close partnership between the US and Australia.
“The US-Australia alliance is a cornerstone of peace and stability in the Indo-Pacific,” said Erika Olson, chargé d’affaires, US mission to Australia.
“The arrival of America, USS San Diego and USS Rushmore marks the first time that the three-ship America Strike Group are together in Sydney.
“We are excited to have sailors and marines here, and warmly welcome them to Sydney.”
The US 7th Fleet is the US Navy’s largest forward-deployed numbered fleet and routinely interacts and operates with allies and partners to preserve a free and open Indo-Pacific region.
The USS America is joined by amphibious transport dock ship USS San Diego and amphibious dock landing ship USS Rushmore and embarked elements from the 31st Marine Expeditionary Unit.
“I want to thank the city of Sydney for their hospitality and the warm welcome of the America Amphibious Ready Group (ARG),” said Capt. John Baggett, commodore of Amphibious Squadron 11, which oversees the America Amphibious Ready Group (ARG).
“Our port visit allows us to deepen friendships with our Australian allies, which is instrumental to our two nations’ forces operating together to maintain regional peace and stability.”
This marks the first time America, San Diego, and Rushmore are moored in Sydney at the same time.
America, San Diego, and Rushmore are part of the America Strike group, which is capable of responding to a range of military operations, including combat operations and humanitarian assistance and disaster response.
https://www.defenceconnect.com.au/naval/16230-uss-america-uss-san-diego-uss-rushmore-arrive-in-sydney-with-31st-marines
https://au.usembassy.gov/uss-america-arrives-in-sydney/
https://x.com/USEmbAustralia/status/1934138030383853983
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73660
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23186860 (161019ZJUN25) Notable: USS America docks in Sydney after 30 days at sea - "If you seem to be hearing a lot of American accents in Sydney this week, you’re not hallucinating. At noon on Saturday, the amphibious assault ship USS America steamed into Sydney Harbour with its crew of around 2500 American sailors and marines ready for a bit of shore leave after a 30-day cruise from their home base in Japan. As The Sunday Telegraph’s in-house American, I was offered the chance to chopper out to the ship aboard a Seahawk helicopter with a small delegation to meet the crew and check out life aboard the ship. After a quick but thorough safety briefing and the distribution of flotation devices and helmets (“cranials”, in navy-speak), our delegation was whisked via Seahawk helicopter to the ship as it steamed its way towards the Heads. Aboard, an atmosphere of tightly controlled chaos reigned as the crew readied the America for arrival at Garden Island, nimbly navigating the ship’s disorienting network of gangways, ramps, and stairs. Tilt-wing Ospreys sat arrayed towards the ship’s bow, further astern were a number of the Pentagon’s prized F35B fighter jets. Able to land vertically like a helicopter on the America’s relatively short flight deck, and equipped with impossibly advanced computer systems, one aviator would be heard to remark that there was “magic in those machines”. Elsewhere, excited sailors went about the business of bringing the ship in safely while also revealing their plans for their leave in Australia - almost all of them as first-time visitors." - James Morrow - dailytelegraph.com.au
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73659
USS America docks in Sydney after 30 days at sea
Amphibious assault ship USS America has steamed into Sydney Harbour, with its 2500-strong ready to hit the town. Our in-house American James Morrow checked out life on board.
James Morrow - June 14, 2025
If you seem to be hearing a lot of American accents in Sydney this week, you’re not hallucinating.
At noon on Saturday, the amphibious assault ship USS America steamed into Sydney Harbour with its crew of around 2500 American sailors and marines ready for a bit of shore leave after a 30-day cruise from their home base in Japan.
As The Sunday Telegraph’s in-house American, I was offered the chance to chopper out to the ship aboard a Seahawk helicopter with a small delegation to meet the crew and check out life aboard the ship.
After a quick but thorough safety briefing and the distribution of flotation devices and helmets (“cranials”, in navy-speak), our delegation was whisked via Seahawk helicopter to the ship as it steamed its way towards the Heads.
Aboard, an atmosphere of tightly controlled chaos reigned as the crew readied the America for arrival at Garden Island, nimbly navigating the ship’s disorienting network of gangways, ramps, and stairs.
Tilt-wing Ospreys sat arrayed towards the ship’s bow, further astern were a number of the Pentagon’s prized F35B fighter jets.
Able to land vertically like a helicopter on the America’s relatively short flight deck, and equipped with impossibly advanced computer systems, one aviator would be heard to remark that there was “magic in those machines”.
Elsewhere, excited sailors went about the business of bringing the ship in safely while also revealing their plans for their leave in Australia – almost all of them as first-time visitors.
One, an avid outdoorsman, revealed his plans to go to the Blue Mountains for a day.
Another junior officer studying to earn his stripes as a surface warfare officer confessed to being a “big foodie” who was looking forward to checking out some good rooftop bars.
This correspondent tried to warn a pair of marines about the threat of “drop bears” but our cover was blown when Lt Commander Craig Hamilton – a Royal Australian Navy officer from Goomeri, QLD on a two-year posting to the ship – laughed a little too loudly.
Hamilton said that while he loved the ship, he was thrilled to be back in Australia and was “looking forward to catching up with my brother, who’s also in the navy, for a couple of beers”.
https://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/news/nsw/uss-america-docks-in-sydney-after-30-days-at-sea/news-story/80235ac0e70afa2ff9fcc80e83085b80
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73661
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23192204 (170850ZJUN25) Notable: PM in subs, regional pitch to keep Trump sweet - Anthony Albanese will use the $368bn AUKUS nuclear submarine deal and Australia’s expanding role in the South Pacific to reassure Donald Trump’s administration that his government is committed to countering Chinese military aggression in the Indo-Pacific. Ahead of his critical first in-person meeting with the US President on Wednesday (AEST), which is scheduled for at least 20 minutes on the sidelines of the G7 summit in Canada, Mr Albanese has launched a major defence of his government’s backing of the US in terms of military support and increased security co-ordination. Amid concerns about Xi Jinping’s military build-up in the region, there are now more US marines based in Australia than since the end of World War II, and joint defence and intelligence operations have been ramped up to unprecedented levels. The Australian Defence Force is preparing to host more than 30,000 military personnel from 19 nations next month as part of the 11th Australia-US led Exercise Talisman Sabre, which will for the first time include training sites in Papua New Guinea. The Australian understands the Prime Minister is preparing to green-light US access to Australia’s critical minerals as Western nations grapple with China’s dominance in the supply of the resources.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73634
>>73655
>>73656
PM in subs, regional pitch to keep Trump sweet
GEOFF CHAMBERS - 16 June 2025
1/2
Anthony Albanese will use the $368bn AUKUS nuclear submarine deal and Australia’s expanding role in the South Pacific to reassure Donald Trump’s administration that his government is committed to countering Chinese military aggression in the Indo-Pacific.
Ahead of his critical first in-person meeting with the US President on Wednesday (AEST), which is scheduled for at least 20 minutes on the sidelines of the G7 summit in Canada, Mr Albanese has launched a major defence of his government’s backing of the US in terms of military support and increased security co-ordination.
Amid concerns about Xi Jinping’s military build-up in the region, there are now more US marines based in Australia than since the end of World War II, and joint defence and intelligence operations have been ramped up to unprecedented levels.
The Australian Defence Force is preparing to host more than 30,000 military personnel from 19 nations next month as part of the 11th Australia-US led Exercise Talisman Sabre, which will for the first time include training sites in Papua New Guinea.
The Australian understands the Prime Minister is preparing to green-light US access to Australia’s critical minerals as Western nations grapple with China’s dominance in the supply of the resources.
Canberra is also lifting defence investment to allow US naval ships to dock and be maintained at domestic ports. The commitments will be used to ensure Mr Trump sticks with the AUKUS deal, which is currently subject to a snap 30-day review by the Pentagon.
Under both Joe Biden’s and Mr Trump’s administrations, US officials have consistently expressed serious concerns over China’s military expansion, aggression and aspirations to reclaim Taiwan. Some have also privately voiced anxieties about Australia’s commitment to joining them in battle with China if required in the event of conflict.
US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth, who last month urged Defence Minister Richard Marles to lift Australia’s defence spending to 3.5 per cent of GDP “as soon as possible”, has warned that by 2027 China could invade Taiwan and spark a major regional war.
Asked on Monday (AEST) if Mr Trump could be confident that Australian would stand side-by-side with the US in the event of conflict in the Indo-Pacific or China invading Taiwan, Mr Albanese said the AUKUS nuclear submarine pact and deeper engagement with Indo-Pacific allies was focused on “peace and security in the region”.
“Australia is a trusted partner to promote peace and security in our region. We have been so forever, if you look at the role that Australia has played,” Mr Albanese said.
While deflecting a question on whether Mr Trump would raise China with him, Mr Albanese pointed to his meeting with Fijian Prime Minister Sitiveni Rabuka in Nadi last Friday as a “reminder that Australia is a trusted partner in the Pacific”.
Mr Albanese, who has spoken with Mr Trump three times on the phone since his return to the White House, has ramped up his government’s focus on diplomatic and military ties with South Pacific nations, which are being targeted by big-spending Chinese officials.
“We’ll continue to play an important role in the Pacific. What that does is to add to security in our region. That is our job. That is what we do. And we all want to see that advance,” he said.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73662
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23192221 (170900ZJUN25) Notable: Conflict cancellation:Albanese’s meeting with Trump cancelled because of Iran-Israel war- Prime Minister Anthony Albanese will have to wait until at least September to take Australia’s case on the AUKUS defence pact directly to Donald Trump, after the US president was forced to leave the G7 summit early to deal with the crisis in the Middle East. The White House confirmed the departure while Albanese was holding a press conference at the summit on issues that he would be discussing with Trump, including trade and AUKUS. Trump’s decision to fly home early is a blow for Albanese, who was due to meet the president face to face for the first time on Wednesday morning (Australian time) to emphasise Australia’s defence contributions as the US reviews the AUKUS submarine deal and calls for more military spending. The government played down the president’s decision to leave, arguing it was understandable against the backdrop of escalating conflict in the Middle East and affected the leaders of Mexico and Ukraine as well. But it leaves Albanese behind numerous other world leaders who have secured time with the president. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said on X that Trump had a good day at the G7 and signed a trade deal with UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer. Fox News reported Trump dined with the G7 leaders in Canada, and then immediately left for Washington. Australia, which is not a member of the G7, was not invited to attend the dinner. Albanese was instead invited to a function with the heads of other nations in the same category such as South Korea and Mexico.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73655
>>73656
>>73661
Albanese’s meeting with Trump cancelled because of Iran-Israel war
James Massola and Michael Koziol - June 17, 2025
1/2
Calgary: Prime Minister Anthony Albanese will have to wait until at least September to take Australia’s case on the AUKUS defence pact directly to Donald Trump, after the US president was forced to leave the G7 summit early to deal with the crisis in the Middle East.
The White House confirmed the departure while Albanese was holding a press conference at the summit on issues that he would be discussing with Trump, including trade and AUKUS.
Trump’s decision to fly home early is a blow for Albanese, who was due to meet the president face to face for the first time on Wednesday morning (Australian time) to emphasise Australia’s defence contributions as the US reviews the AUKUS submarine deal and calls for more military spending.
The government played down the president’s decision to leave, arguing it was understandable against the backdrop of escalating conflict in the Middle East and affected the leaders of Mexico and Ukraine as well.
But it leaves Albanese behind numerous other world leaders who have secured time with the president. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said on X that Trump had a good day at the G7 and signed a trade deal with UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer.
“Much was accomplished, but because of what’s going on in the Middle East, President Trump will be leaving tonight after dinner with Heads of State,” she said on X.
Fox News reported Trump dined with the G7 leaders in Canada, and then immediately left for Washington. Australia, which is not a member of the G7, was not invited to attend the dinner.
Albanese was instead invited to a function with the heads of other nations in the same category such as South Korea and Mexico.
It is not the first time Trump has left a G7 meeting early. In 2018, after contentious sessions with world leaders over trade and Russia’s exclusion from the group, Trump departed hours before the summit ended and headed for Singapore, where he met North Korean dictator Kim Jong-un.
Albanese had also planned to lobby Trump to wind back 50 per cent tariffs imposed on Australian steel and aluminium and a 10 per cent tariff on other goods entering the United States.
A spokeswoman for the prime minister said that the president’s departure was “understandable” as conflict escalates between Israel and Iran.
“As the prime minister said a short time ago, we are very concerned about the events in the Middle East and continue to urge all parties to prioritise dialogue and diplomacy,” the spokeswoman said.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73663
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23192231 (170905ZJUN25) Notable: Video: Donald Trump left G7 before one-on-one with Anthony Albanese - Anthony Albanese's one-on-one meeting with Donald Trump has been abandoned, after the American president departed the three-day G7 summit early citing developments in the Middle East. The planned talks were highly anticipated, particularly after the Trump administration revealed it was reviewing the $368 billion AUKUS submarine deal last week. News of Mr Trump's unexpected departure broke just minutes after the prime minister told a media conference in Calgary that he "looked forward to the meeting and looked forward to it taking place". The face-to-face meeting - which would have been the first between the two leaders - was scheduled to take place on the sidelines of the summit on Wednesday morning. But in a statement posted to social media on Tuesday, US Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said Mr Trump would instead be returning to Washington after dinner. The president had planned to hold other meetings with world leaders, including Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, that were also scrapped. Mr Albanese had previously said he intended to raise the Trump administration's tariffs on Australian exports and the AUKUS partnership during the high-stakes talks. In a statement, a spokesperson for the prime minister said Mr Trump's decision to leave early was understandable "given what is occurring in the Middle East". "As the prime minister said a short time ago, we are very concerned about the events in the Middle East and continue to urge all parties to prioritise dialogue and diplomacy," they said.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73662
Donald Trump left G7 before one-on-one with Anthony Albanese
Maani Truu - 17 June 2025
Anthony Albanese's one-on-one meeting with Donald Trump has been abandoned, after the American president departed the three-day G7 summit early citing developments in the Middle East.
The planned talks were highly anticipated, particularly after the Trump administration revealed it was reviewing the $368 billion AUKUS submarine deal last week.
News of Mr Trump's unexpected departure broke just minutes after the prime minister told a media conference in Calgary that he "looked forward to the meeting and looked forward to it taking place".
The face-to-face meeting - which would have been the first between the two leaders - was scheduled to take place on the sidelines of the summit on Wednesday morning.
But in a statement posted to social media on Tuesday, US Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said Mr Trump would instead be returning to Washington after dinner.
"President Trump had a great day at the G7, even signing a major trade deal with the United Kingdom and Prime Minister Keir Starmer," the statement read.
"Much was accomplished, but because of what's happening in the Middle East, President Trump will be leaving tonight after dinner with the Heads of State."
The president had planned to hold other meetings with world leaders, including Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, that were also scrapped.
Mr Albanese had previously said he intended to raise the Trump administration's tariffs on Australian exports and the AUKUS partnership during the high-stakes talks.
In a statement, a spokesperson for the prime minister said Mr Trump's decision to leave early was understandable "given what is occurring in the Middle East".
"As the prime minister said a short time ago, we are very concerned about the events in the Middle East and continue to urge all parties to prioritise dialogue and diplomacy," they said.
Back in Australia, Acting Prime Minister Richard Marles also downplayed the significance of the president's cancellation.
"We shouldn't be reading more into it than that, this is essentially the American president needing to deal with what is obviously playing out in the world today," he told reporters on Tuesday.
"We have seen our prime minister and the president have a number of phone calls to date, they are building a rapport, we have been able to deal with our issues with the United States, [and] I'm sure that in the not to distance future they will meet face-to-face."
Albanese set expectations for talks
Mr Albanese appeared unaware of any changes to the president's plans as he spoke to reporters in Calgary, suggesting it would be unreasonable to expect that the meeting would result in the complete removal of the tariffs.
"When I first raised with President Trump the issue of tariffs, of course, he said he would give it great consideration," he told reporters.
"I would expect that that will continue and that we'll continue to put forward our case as we have in all of the discussions that I've had with President Trump."
The prime minister said he had prepared extensively for his talks with Mr Trump, including by conferring with United States Ambassador Kevin Rudd and golfing great Greg Norman, who is friends with the president.
"I take that responsibility seriously and I look forward to tomorrow's meeting," he said.
Mr Albanese was also asked whether the president had responded to his invitation to visit Australia, to which he said Mr Trump would "always be a welcome guest".
Opposition Leader Sussan Ley echoed the government's comments that the cancellation was understandable, but added that the prime minister should have "been more proactive in seeking to strengthen" Australia's most important relationship.
"This was an important opportunity for the prime minister to seek assurances on AUKUS and protect Australia from tariffs," she said in a statement.
"Given global volatility and the growing list of issues in our relationship with the United States, this underscores that the Albanese government should not have merely relied on meeting with the president on the sidelines of international summits."
The prime minister will go ahead with other planned meetings on Wednesday, including with European leaders and Japan's Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba.
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-06-17/trump-to-leave-g7-early-albanese-meeting/105425602
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OcsudTjKP34
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73664
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23192240 (170912ZJUN25) Notable: Anthony Albanese still can’t get a sit-down meeting with Donald Trump - Donald Trump’s shock decision to leave the G7 summit early and cancel his meeting with Anthony Albanese has put the Prime Minister in a politically awkward position that has immediately drawn criticism over when he will sit down in person with the US President. Trump, who is dealing with a genuine threat that the Israel-Iran war could morph into a wider Middle East war and draw in US armed forces, has left Albanese in an embarrassing position after weeks of build-up that the pair would finally develop their relationship beyond three phone calls. Just minutes after Albanese finished a late afternoon press conference in Calgary, which is about one hour away from the G7 summit action in the Canadian mountainside town of Kananaskis, Mr Trump’s press secretary Karoline Leavitt delivered the news that Australian officials had been dreading - the meeting was off. Over recent days as the Middle East conflict escalated, Albanese and his ambassador to the US, Kevin Rudd, had been concerned the long-awaited meeting with Trump may not eventuate. Albanese was scheduled to speak with Trump for at least 20 minutes about 5.15pm local time on Tuesday afternoon (Wednesday AEST), shortly before the PM returned home from Canada. The 62-year-old was expected to be the second last leader to hold talks with Trump before the US President jetted home to deal with the war. In the past five days, Albanese has caught up with other key strategic allies and partners in Canada and Fiji. But overwhelmingly, the purpose of the trip was geared around the meeting with Trump. Albanese is not the only leader who misses out on a G7 meet with Trump. But the abrupt cancellation will spark criticism from detractors who will describe it as a “snub” and say it is proof that Australia does not rate highly on Trump’s radar.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73662
Anthony Albanese still can’t get a sit-down meeting with Donald Trump
GEOFF CHAMBERS - 17 June 2025
1/2
Donald Trump’s shock decision to leave the G7 summit early and cancel his meeting with Anthony Albanese has put the Prime Minister in a politically awkward position that has immediately drawn criticism over when he will sit down in person with the US President.
Trump, who is dealing with a genuine threat that the Israel-Iran war could morph into a wider Middle East war and draw in US armed forces, has left Albanese in an embarrassing position after weeks of build-up that the pair would finally develop their relationship beyond three phone calls.
Just minutes after Albanese finished a late afternoon press conference in Calgary, which is about one hour away from the G7 summit action in the Canadian mountainside town of Kananaskis, Mr Trump’s press secretary Karoline Leavitt delivered the news that Australian officials had been dreading – the meeting was off. Over recent days as the Middle East conflict escalated, Albanese and his ambassador to the US, Kevin Rudd, had been concerned the long-awaited meeting with Trump may not eventuate.
Albanese was scheduled to speak with Trump for at least 20 minutes about 5.15pm local time on Tuesday afternoon (Wednesday AEST), shortly before the PM returned home from Canada. The 62-year-old was expected to be the second last leader to hold talks with Trump before the US President jetted home to deal with the war.
In the past five days, Albanese has caught up with other key strategic allies and partners in Canada and Fiji. But overwhelmingly, the purpose of the trip was geared around the meeting with Trump. Albanese is not the only leader who misses out on a G7 meet with Trump. But the abrupt cancellation will spark criticism from detractors who will describe it as a “snub” and say it is proof that Australia does not rate highly on Trump’s radar.
There was one bright spot for Albanese.
Shortly before he spoke with reporters, Trump appeared to back in the $368bn AUKUS nuclear submarine defence pact that is currently subject to a snap 30-day Pentagon review.
British Prime Minister Keir Starmer, who had a huge win after Trump exempted the UK from his trade tariffs because “I like them”, put the billionaire on the spot over AUKUS after the pair clinched a sweeping new economic prosperity deal.
Standing next to Trump after their G7 bilateral meeting, Starmer responded to a question on the nuclear submarine deal by declaring “we’re proceeding” with AUKUS. Trump nodded his head and responded by saying “we’re very long-time partners and allies and friends” and noted he and Starmer had “become friends in a short period of time”.
Albanese’s meeting with Starmer on Wednesday will be important. He will be able to exchange notes with the British PM on his talks with Trump on AUKUS, how he won exemptions and how to deal with the wildcard president.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73665
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23192280 (170937ZJUN25) Notable: Anthony Albanese relies on Keir Starmer to secure Donald Trump’s backing for AUKUS - When it comes to AUKUS, Anthony Albanese is lucky to have Sir Keir Starmer in his corner. Australia’s Prime Minister has missed his chance, for now, to personally win Donald Trump’s direct support for the submarine pact, with the US President departing the G7 in Canada to deal with the Middle East war. But amid a snap 30-day review of AUKUS ordered by the Trump administration, the British Prime Minister appears to have secured presidential backing for the deal. Unlike Albanese, Sir Keir managed to get a meeting with Trump before he skipped town. Asked later at a joint press conference with the President whether the trilateral subs deal was proceeding, the pair looked at each other and nodded in agreement. Answering for them both, Sir Keir said: “Yep, we’re proceeding with that, it’s a really important deal to both of us.” While not quite from the horse’s mouth, the statement will be a relief for Albanese. Britain can build its nuclear submarines if need be, but Australia would be up the proverbial creek if the AUKUS deal fell over. The navy’s six Collins-class boats are on their last legs, even with planned life-extending upgrades. After having run down the clock with false starts on Japanese and French submarines, the collapse of AUKUS would leave Australia without a viable submarine force for decades. And as the government has warned, only nuclear-powered submarines offer the capability Australia needs to stealthily deter Chinese threats. The fact Albanese has to rely on Sir Keir to get Trump to endorse the AUKUS deal is somewhat embarrassing for him, but he’ll take any help he can get.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73634
>>73662
Anthony Albanese relies on Keir Starmer to secure Donald Trump’s backing for AUKUS
BEN PACKHAM - 17 June 2025
When it comes to AUKUS, Anthony Albanese is lucky to have Sir Keir Starmer in his corner.
Australia’s Prime Minister has missed his chance, for now, to personally win Donald Trump’s direct support for the submarine pact, with the US President departing the G7 in Canada to deal with the Middle East war.
But amid a snap 30-day review of AUKUS ordered by the Trump administration, the British Prime Minister appears to have secured presidential backing for the deal.
Unlike Albanese, Sir Keir managed to get a meeting with Trump before he skipped town.
Asked later at a joint press conference with the President whether the trilateral subs deal was proceeding, the pair looked at each other and nodded in agreement.
Answering for them both, Sir Keir said: “Yep, we’re proceeding with that, it’s a really important deal to both of us.”
While not quite from the horse’s mouth, the statement will be a relief for Albanese.
Britain can build its nuclear submarines if need be, but Australia would be up the proverbial creek if the AUKUS deal fell over.
The navy’s six Collins-class boats are on their last legs, even with planned life-extending upgrades. After having run down the clock with false starts on Japanese and French submarines, the collapse of AUKUS would leave Australia without a viable submarine force for decades.
And as the government has warned, only nuclear-powered submarines offer the capability Australia needs to stealthily deter Chinese threats.
The fact Albanese has to rely on Sir Keir to get Trump to endorse the AUKUS deal is somewhat embarrassing for him, but he’ll take any help he can get.
Sir Keir and Trump get along well, despite their political differences. “He’s slightly more liberal than I am, but for some reason we get along,” Trump said after their meeting in Kananaskis, Alberta.
Albanese and Trump have had three phone conversations but are yet to meet in person. And there are question marks over the PM’s ability to win over the unpredictable President. Trump is also renowned for tearing up deals signed by his predecessors, and key figures in the Trump administration are deeply sceptical of AUKUS.
The Albanese government has put on a brave face after the review announcement, arguing it’s normal for an incoming government to run the rule over such a big undertaking.
Yet there are very real concerns about the US’s long-term commitment to the deal and its ability to deliver a promised three to five Virginia-class submarines to Australia before supporting the US and Britain to build their own fleets of SSN AUKUS subs.
The US is building 1.2 Virginia boats a year but needs to turn out at least 2.33 a year to have enough to give to Australia without undermining its submarine force.
The US’s influential Pentagon deputy Elbridge Colby told a British think tank last year he would have been “quite sceptical” about signing off the AUKUS agreement, saying its benefits were “questionable … My concern is, why are we giving away this crown jewel asset when we most need it?
“AUKUS is only going to lead to more submarines collectively in 10, 15, 20 years, way beyond the window of maximum danger, which is in this decade.”
Colby is also concerned that any submarines given to Australia might not be made available in the event of a war with China over Taiwan. The results of the review are likely to elaborate on these problems and more.
But Trump’s nod for AUKUS looks like keeping open the “optimal pathway” for us to acquire nuclear submarines … for now.
https://www.theaustralian.com.au/commentary/anthony-albanese-relies-on-keir-starmer-to-secure-donald-trumps-backing-for-aukus/news-story/6454b955894fc823ac3d4b57369cbebc
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73666
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23197936 (180914ZJUN25) Notable: Australia races to lock in new meeting with Trump to avoid second snub - Australia’s ambassador to the US, Kevin Rudd, is leading a diplomatic push to lock in a meeting for Prime Minister Anthony Albanese with US President Donald Trump in Europe next week, which would force Albanese to depart Australia again just days after returning from his failed attempt to meet Trump in Canada. The president is scheduled to be at the NATO summit beginning June 24 in The Hague, and a meeting would give the prime minister a chance to press Australia’s case with the US on the AUKUS nuclear submarine deal, defence spending and tariffs. But the risk that Trump could cancel to deal with escalating conflict in the Middle East presents a dilemma for Albanese, who has tried to brush off the blow of Trump cancelling their meeting at the G7 for the same reason. A day after saying he expected Deputy Prime Minister Richard Marles would attend the NATO summit, Albanese changed his mind and said he could go. “Yes, that’s being considered,” he told reporters travelling with him at the G7 summit in Canada. Sources familiar with Australia’s diplomatic approach, who weren’t authorised to speak publicly, said Rudd was leading work on a potential meeting and that Albanese was unlikely to go to NATO unless time with Trump was certain. While Rudd is leading the push to secure the meeting, Albanese has also sought advice from Greg Norman about how to build a connection with Trump. The strategy mirrors the playbook of Malcolm Turnbull, who also turned to the professional golfer to get in touch with Trump in 2016.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73662
>>73665
Australia races to lock in new meeting with Trump to avoid second snub
James Massola - June 18, 2025
1/2
Kananaskis: Australia’s ambassador to the US, Kevin Rudd, is leading a diplomatic push to lock in a meeting for Prime Minister Anthony Albanese with US President Donald Trump in Europe next week, which would force Albanese to depart Australia again just days after returning from his failed attempt to meet Trump in Canada.
The president is scheduled to be at the NATO summit beginning June 24 in The Hague, and a meeting would give the prime minister a chance to press Australia’s case with the US on the AUKUS nuclear submarine deal, defence spending and tariffs.
But the risk that Trump could cancel to deal with escalating conflict in the Middle East presents a dilemma for Albanese, who has tried to brush off the blow of Trump cancelling their meeting at the G7 for the same reason.
A day after saying he expected Deputy Prime Minister Richard Marles would attend the NATO summit, Albanese changed his mind and said he could go. “Yes, that’s being considered,” he told reporters travelling with him at the G7 summit in Canada.
Sources familiar with Australia’s diplomatic approach, who weren’t authorised to speak publicly, said Rudd was leading work on a potential meeting and that Albanese was unlikely to go to NATO unless time with Trump was certain.
While Rudd is leading the push to secure the meeting, Albanese has also sought advice from Greg Norman about how to build a connection with Trump. The strategy mirrors the playbook of Malcolm Turnbull, who also turned to the professional golfer to get in touch with Trump in 2016.
The White House confirmed two weeks ago that Trump would attend the NATO summit, which is expected to focus on Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and the ongoing war between Israel and Iran. Yet on Wednesday morning, a US State Department official said that Trump’s plan to attend could change because of the “rapidly changing situation in the Middle East”.
Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum tweeted on Wednesday morning that she had received a phone call from Trump after her own meeting was cancelled, but Albanese said he had not had a similar phone call.
Instead of an audience with the US president in Canada, the prime minister met with three of Trump’s most senior economic advisers, salvaging some time with White House officials.
Joined by Rudd, Albanese met Kevin Hassett, Trump’s director of the National Economic Council, and US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer. He then met US Secretary of the Treasury Scott Bessent for about 20 minutes.
The discussions focused on trade between the two nations, the US imposition of tariffs on Australian aluminium, iron ore and other goods and Australia’s willingness to be a reliable supplier of critical minerals and rare earths to the US.
Albanese played down the fact that he had not received a call from Trump as Sheinbaum had.
“We’re mature about the circumstances of what happened. It’s perfectly understandable. We’ll reschedule a meeting. From time to time, that is what occurs,” he said.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73667
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23197948 (180929ZJUN25) Notable: G7: Anthony Albanese invokes concerns about China’s dominance of global critical minerals supply chains - Anthony Albanese has invoked concerns about China’s dominance of global critical minerals supply chains in his first speech at the G7 summit, warning that “critical minerals markets are concentrated and vulnerable to manipulation”. Speaking to G7 leaders in the Canadian Rockies town of Kananaskis, the Prime Minister spruiked Australia’s vast deposits of critical minerals and raised the perverse impacts geopolitical tensions are having on energy security and supply chains. Asked to address the summit by Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney, Mr Albanese said over recent years “we have all felt the impact of conflict, non-market practices and unfair competition”. Mr Albanese did not mention China specifically but Xi Jinping’s Communist regime has overseen a domination of critical minerals supply chains. The US, Australia, Japan, South Korea and other regional allies have been working together to break Beijing’s stranglehold on critical minerals supply chains. “Critical minerals are the new drivers of energy security. Australia is blessed to have some of the largest critical minerals deposits on earth. But we are increasingly finding that critical minerals markets are concentrated and vulnerable to manipulation,” Mr Albanese said. “Producers struggle to remain competitive, and supply chains are affected by export bans and controls.” As the Albanese government progresses deals with the US and other allies to turbocharge Australia’s critical minerals market, Mr Albanese said “energy security underpins our growth and prosperity, and is essential for our economic resilience and national security”.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73662
>>73666
G7: Anthony Albanese invokes concerns about China’s dominance of global critical minerals supply chains
GEOFF CHAMBERS - 18 June 2025
1/2
Anthony Albanese has invoked concerns about China’s dominance of global critical minerals supply chains in his first speech at the G7 summit, warning that “critical minerals markets are concentrated and vulnerable to manipulation”.
Speaking to G7 leaders in the Canadian Rockies town of Kananaskis, the Prime Minister spruiked Australia’s vast deposits of critical minerals and raised the perverse impacts geopolitical tensions are having on energy security and supply chains.
Asked to address the summit by Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney, Mr Albanese said over recent years “we have all felt the impact of conflict, non-market practices and unfair competition”.
Mr Albanese did not mention China specifically but Xi Jinping’s Communist regime has overseen a domination of critical minerals supply chains. The US, Australia, Japan, South Korea and other regional allies have been working together to break Beijing’s stranglehold on critical minerals supply chains.
“Critical minerals are the new drivers of energy security. Australia is blessed to have some of the largest critical minerals deposits on earth. But we are increasingly finding that critical minerals markets are concentrated and vulnerable to manipulation,” Mr Albanese said.
“Producers struggle to remain competitive, and supply chains are affected by export bans and controls.”
As the Albanese government progresses deals with the US and other allies to turbocharge Australia’s critical minerals market, Mr Albanese said “energy security underpins our growth and prosperity, and is essential for our economic resilience and national security”.
“Whether that is to meet the challenge of climate change and drive the energy transition or to power new technologies that can transform our economy into the future – it is essential to our national interest,” he said.
After announcing a critical minerals reserve ahead of the May 3 election, Mr Albanese said his government was focused on developing Australia into a “globally significant producer and supplier of critical minerals”.
“Extracting and refining our natural assets to safeguard the resilience of our economy and support the economic security of our partners. Our new Strategic Reserve will allow us to deal with trade and market disruptions while meeting increasing global demand.”
“I am pleased that Australia is joining the G7 Critical Minerals Action Plan, which will support secure, diversified critical minerals supply chains. We welcome efforts to level the playing field and establish a stable market that reflects the real costs of delivering high-standard products and trade practices.”
Mr Albanese said Australia would work with Indo-Pacific partners on their clean energy transition and ensure regional partners can “build resilient, sustainable energy sectors and unlock trade and investment”.
In a second summit intervention, Mr Albanese linked Australia’s critical minerals push to the development of “high tech manufacturing, and advancements in Artificial Intelligence and quantum”.
“Australia has made significant investments in quantum technologies – including working with the private sector to develop the first utility-scale, fault-tolerant quantum computer. We are building on our strengths in quantum and AI applications, especially in mining, agriculture and medical technology.”
“Australia can be a leader in data centres in our region due to our abundant land and renewable energy resources. We are also harnessing new technologies to become a leader in green metals and clean energy.”
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73668
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23197965 (180943ZJUN25) Notable: Scott Morrison calls for an AUKUS pillar 3 - the space frontier - Scott Morrison, the chief architect of the AUKUS pact has called for the military alliance to be expanded into space under a third pillar that would see Australia take a key role in the geopolitical deterrence in the southern hemisphere. The former Coalition prime minister has declared that space technology would become as critical to western defence architecture as the submarine program and could bring other nations including Japan and NATO into the alliance. With the AUKUS program now under review by the Pentagon, the extension of the program into a third pillar - space technology – would also provide the political incentive Donald Trump needs to put his own stamp on the AUKUS pact which was inked by Mr Morrison and former Democrat President Joe Biden and the UK’s former Prime Minister Boris Johnson. “As the Trump administration examines how to improve AUKUS, there’s another important factor - space,” Mr Morrison says in an opinion piece published in the US paper, The Wall Street Journal. “If our nations are serious about deterrence, then we must prepare for new theatres of geopolitical competition. The global space economy now exceeds $630 billion and is projected to nearly triple in value by 2035. But space is no longer a benign domain. Beijing is already operating dual-use, civil-military technology across its space sector, launching manoeuverable satellites, conducting co-orbital rendezvous operations, and testing systems capable of disabling adversary assets, such as its Shenlong spaceplane.”
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73432
>>73544
>>73634
Scott Morrison calls for an AUKUS pillar 3 – the space frontier
SIMON BENSON - 18 June 2025
Scott Morrison, the chief architect of the AUKUS pact has called for the military alliance to be expanded into space under a third pillar that would see Australia take a key role in the geopolitical deterrence in the southern hemisphere.
The former Coalition prime minister has declared that space technology would become as critical to western defence architecture as the submarine program and could bring other nations including Japan and NATO into the alliance.
With the AUKUS program now under review by the Pentagon, the extension of the program into a third pillar – space technology – would also provide the political incentive Donald Trump needs to put his own stamp on the AUKUS pact which was inked by Mr Morrison and former Democrat President Joe Biden and the UK’s former Prime Minister Boris Johnson.
“As the Trump administration examines how to improve AUKUS, there’s another important factor – space,” Mr Morrison says in an opinion piece published in the US paper, The Wall Street Journal.
“If our nations are serious about deterrence, then we must prepare for new theatres of geopolitical competition. The global space economy now exceeds $630 billion and is projected to nearly triple in value by 2035. But space is no longer a benign domain.
“It is contested, competitive and strategically vital. In March, Commander of US Space Command General Stephen Whiting recently warned Congress, space superiority has become foundational to homeland defence and global deterrence.
“Beijing is already operating dual-use, civil-military technology across its space sector, launching manoeuverable satellites, conducting co-orbital rendezvous operations, and testing systems capable of disabling adversary assets, such as its Shenlong spaceplane.
“China has also deployed ground-based lasers and high-powered microwaves capable of targeting Western satellites. Russia regularly jams and spoofs satellites and Moscow has tested destructive anti-satellite capabilities.
“No American president since John F. Kennedy has shown more commitment to space than President Trump, from backing the Artemis Moon to Mars program to creating the US Space Force and promoting commercial innovation through public-private partnerships and now the Golden Dome. That leadership makes him the natural champion of an Aukus Pillar III that consolidates co-operation across launch systems, satellite architecture, cybersecurity, data integration, and industrial innovation.
“Australia brings unique advantages to this effort. We already host U.S. assets like the Space Surveillance Telescope and C-Band radar in Western Australia. We’re also leading the AUKUS allies’ effort to develop Deep Space Advanced Radar Capability, or DARC.
“Due to be operational in 2026, DARC will track objects in geosynchronous orbit, which includes some of the most valuable and vulnerable satellite assets.
“Our Southern Hemisphere geography gives us lines of sight inaccessible from the north.
“Australia is the only Five Eyes nation in the southern half of the planet with the large landmass and secure jurisdiction critical for both passive surveillance and active launch capabilities.”
Mr Morrison also said that the Trump administration’s request that allies lift defence spending to above three per cent was not an “unreasonable request”.
“AUKUS is a new platform for collective deterrence against an axis of autocratic regimes threatening global and regional security, especially in the Indo-Pacific,” Mr Morrison writes.
“The agreement’s first pillar enables Australia’s acquisition of its first nuclear-powered sub fleet. Its second pillar facilitates co-operation on advanced military capabilities, from quantum computing to hypersonic missiles.
“The Chinese Communist Party opposed AUKUS vehemently, confirming its strategic value.
“(But) AUKUS isn’t like other alliances. There are no free riders. Each nation must bring its own capability, commitment and strategic clarity to the table.
“Australia is doing its part.
“It is time to take AUKUS into space. Establishing a Pillar III would ensure that space, the ultimate high ground, is secured by free nations, not our enemies. America and Australia have stood shoulder to shoulder on land, at sea, and in the skies. Now we must do the same in orbit.”
https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/scott-morrison-calls-for-an-aukus-pillar-3-the-space-frontier/news-story/a26e47e4e92731442657c35187d237b3
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73669
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23197971 (180948ZJUN25) Notable: How Donald Trump can launch AUKUS into space - "Time has borne out what I said to President Trump on the White House South Lawn in September 2019: While Australia may look to the US as a vital ally, we will never leave it to America alone to deal with security issues. In that spirit, in early 2020 as prime minister I assigned a small team to engage Washington about the possibility of Australia acquiring nuclear-powered submarine technology. Two years later the AUKUS agreement among Australia, the UK and the US was born, amid bipartisan support in all three nations. Now, it’s time for AUKUS to grow, and Mr Trump is the right person for the job. AUKUS is a platform for collective deterrence against an axis of autocratic regimes threatening global and regional security, especially in the Indo-Pacific. The agreement’s first pillar enables Australia’s acquisition of its first nuclear-powered sub fleet. Its second pillar facilitates cooperation on advanced military capabilities, from quantum computing to hypersonic missiles. The Chinese Communist Party opposed AUKUS vehemently - confirming its strategic value. No American president since John F. Kennedy has shown more commitment to space than Mr Trump, from backing the Artemis Moon to Mars program to creating the US Space Force and promoting commercial innovation through public-private partnerships and now the Golden Dome. That leadership makes him the natural champion of an AUKUS Pillar III that consolidates cooperation across launch systems, satellite architecture, cybersecurity, data integration and industrial innovation. This would enable better coordination of allied space policies and create shared standards across defense and commercial systems. It should also provide a platform for integrating non-Aukus allies such as Japan and NATO members into the same architecture. That would make clear that the allies’ space systems are resilient, interconnected and can’t be targeted in isolation. Establishing a Pillar III would ensure that space, the ultimate high ground, is secured by free nations, not our enemies. America and Australia have stood shoulder to shoulder on land, at sea and in the skies. Now we must do the same in orbit." - Scott Morrison, Australia’s prime minister from 2018-22 and vice-chairman of American Global Strategies - theaustralian.com.au
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73668
How Donald Trump can launch AUKUS into space
Scott Morrison - 18 June 2025
1/2
Time has borne out what I said to President Trump on the White House South Lawn in September 2019: While Australia may look to the US as a vital ally, we will never leave it to America alone to deal with security issues.
In that spirit, in early 2020 as prime minister I assigned a small team to engage Washington about the possibility of Australia acquiring nuclear-powered submarine technology. Two years later the AUKUS agreement among Australia, the UK and the US was born, amid bipartisan support in all three nations. Now, it’s time for AUKUS to grow, and Mr Trump is the right person for the job.
AUKUS is a platform for collective deterrence against an axis of autocratic regimes threatening global and regional security, especially in the Indo-Pacific. The agreement’s first pillar enables Australia’s acquisition of its first nuclear-powered sub fleet. Its second pillar facilitates cooperation on advanced military capabilities, from quantum computing to hypersonic missiles. The Chinese Communist Party opposed AUKUS vehemently — confirming its strategic value.
AUKUS isn’t like other alliances. There are no free riders. Each nation must bring its own capability, commitment and strategic clarity to the table.
Australia is doing its part. Under Pillar I, by 2029 we will have invested up to $3billion directly into the American defence industrial base to increase nuclear submarine production capacity. No other US ally can make that claim. We are building our own fleet of SSN-Aukus submarines with the UK and upgrading infrastructure in Western Australia to support, service, and operate American, UK, and Australian submarines from our western coast.
Some observers reacted to the Pentagon’s current review of AUKUS as if it spells the alliance’s doom. But a review – which isn’t unusual for an incoming administration – is a chance to refocus and recalibrate.
The review is motivated by the shortfall of US nuclear-submarine production. The current output of Virginia-class submarines is about 1.3 a year, below the 2.33 needed to meet both Aukus and American naval commitments. This threatens the timeline for Australia to acquire its first boats from the US and ultimately undermines deterrence. Mr Trump’s commitment to fixing this shortfall is welcome and essential.
America is also calling on Australia to lift its defence spending to above 3% of gross domestic product. That isn’t an unreasonable request. The US can’t be expected to carry the world’s security burden in isolation, and Washington has been right to push for similar commitments from allies in and outside the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation.
Australia stood with America in every major conflict for over a century, even when others turned their backs. Our interests and loyalties are strongly aligned. A stable Indo-Pacific is critical to Australia’s security and prosperity. That includes protecting the status quo in Taiwan, freedom of navigation, and the rule of law. Washington can rely on us to turn up when it counts.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73670
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23197979 (181000ZJUN25) Notable: Ghost Bat missile trial looms amid growing foreign interest - Boeing Australia’s MQ-28A Ghost Bat drone will be trialled as an armed platform later this year in a major leap forward for the program, as the government ramps up efforts to acquire lethal uncrewed aircraft. The developmental drone will test-fire an air-to-air missile after a successful trial last week in which two of the aircraft were operated simultaneously from an RAAF jet. The government, which has poured $1bn of taxpayers’ funds into the aircraft, had deferred plans to arm the Ghost Bat, intending to develop it initially for surveillance and electronic warfare missions. But there is growing confidence in the drone after the latest test at South Australia’s top-secret Woomera range, prompting the fast-tracking of the missile trial. “There will be an armed trial later this year,” Defence Industry Minister Pat Conroy said. “Boeing is working on plans that will involve an air-to-air weapons test.” Mr Conroy declined to say when the Ghost Bat was expected to enter service but said the program was running four months ahead of schedule and indicated it was in line for further funding when its budget was expended by the end of the year. He said the drone was one of the top five capabilities the government was marketing to foreign militaries, and was already attracting strong interest from potential overseas buyers.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73567
Ghost Bat missile trial looms amid growing foreign interest
BEN PACKHAM - 17 June 2025
1/2
Boeing Australia’s MQ-28A Ghost Bat drone will be trialled as an armed platform later this year in a major leap forward for the program, as the government ramps up efforts to acquire lethal uncrewed aircraft.
The developmental drone will test-fire an air-to-air missile after a successful trial last week in which two of the aircraft were operated simultaneously from an RAAF jet.
The government, which has poured $1bn of taxpayers’ funds into the aircraft, had deferred plans to arm the Ghost Bat, intending to develop it initially for surveillance and electronic warfare missions.
But there is growing confidence in the drone after the latest test at South Australia’s top-secret Woomera range, prompting the fast-tracking of the missile trial.
“There will be an armed trial later this year,” Defence Industry Minister Pat Conroy said. “Boeing is working on plans that will involve an air-to-air weapons test.”
The drone will fire a US-made AMRAAM missile, which the RAAF uses on its F-35s and F/A-18 Super Hornets.
Mr Conroy declined to say when the Ghost Bat was expected to enter service but said the program was running four months ahead of schedule and indicated it was in line for further funding when its budget was expended by the end of the year.
He said the drone was one of the top five capabilities the government was marketing to foreign militaries, and was already attracting strong interest from potential overseas buyers.
“It’s one of the most advanced collaborative combat aircraft in the world,” Mr Conroy said.
The endorsement follows Boeing’s failure to gain entry into the US’s Collaborative Combat Aircraft program to acquire hundreds of “loyal wingman”-style drones to operate with crewed fighter jets, prompting fears the Ghost Bat could become an expensive “orphan” capability.
The US Air Force selected tech disrupter Anduril and longtime drone-maker General Atomics as its top candidates for manufacturing and testing under the CAA program.
But Mr Conroy said the government was hopeful the Ghost Bat could still gain entry to the US program.
The two Ghost Bats involved in last week’s trial were operated from an E-7A Wedgetail – an airborne early warning and control aircraft based on a Boeing 737 airframe.
Boeing defence, space and security chief executive Steve Parker said the demonstration was a “first of its kind” with a collaborative combat aircraft.
He told reporters at the Paris Air Show that the company had been honing its machine learning, autonomy and artificial intelligence in the Ghost Bat’s development, delivering “the most advanced CCA” available.
“We are seeing a lot of interest from around the globe, back into the US, as well as (in) Europe,” Mr Parker said.
Further testing will see the drones operated from Super Hornets and F-35s. The Ghost Bat received $400m from the Albanese government in February 2024 to deliver three new prototype aircraft by the end of this year, after $600m in earlier funding.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73671
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23198013 (181033ZJUN25) Notable: Top China military official disappears in latest purge under Xi Jinping amid rising factional politics - The disappearance of another high-ranking Chinese military official has demonstrated that no-one is indispensable to President Xi Jinping in achieving his goals. Even those among his closest allies. General He Weidong, China's second-ranking military official and co-vice chairman of the powerful Central Military Commission (CMC), has not been seen in public since March 11. His name was also absent from the official list of attendees at the funeral of his former colleague, Xu Qiliang, who was also a co-vice chairman of the CMC. With silence often treated as confirmation in China's highly choreographed political system, He's ongoing absence confirms his removal from power. His disappearance follows a similar pattern of recent high-profile purges. Former foreign minister Qin Gang and former defence minister Li Shangfu also disappeared from public view before they were removed from their positions. He's dismissal comes after a longstanding personal and professional relationship with Xi. Xi and He both served in the local government of Fujian province in the 1990s and 2000s, with He promoted to "full general" - the highest military rank — in 2017 and eventually co-vice chairman in 2022. It's a position that granted him more than just command of the military. It also made him a member of the elite Politburo - the top decision-making body of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). His sudden fall just three years into the role underscores the intensity of internal instability within the CCP. Despite projecting a unified public image, the highest level of China's political system is a pressure cooker of competing ambitions, ideological divides, and factional loyalties. Xi's leadership has been marked by a relentless consolidation of power and a sweeping anti-corruption campaign, but the frequent removal of his own appointees suggests cracks in the system he has built.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73560
Top China military official disappears in latest purge under Xi Jinping amid rising factional politics
Bang Xiao - 18 June 2025
1/2
The disappearance of another high-ranking Chinese military official has demonstrated that no-one is indispensable to President Xi Jinping in achieving his goals.
Even those among his closest allies.
General He Weidong, China's second-ranking military official and co-vice chairman of the powerful Central Military Commission (CMC), has not been seen in public since March 11.
His name was also absent from the official list of attendees at the funeral of his former colleague, Xu Qiliang, who was also a co-vice chairman of the CMC.
With silence often treated as confirmation in China's highly choreographed political system, He's ongoing absence confirms his removal from power.
His disappearance follows a similar pattern of recent high-profile purges. Former foreign minister Qin Gang and former defence minister Li Shangfu also disappeared from public view before they were removed from their positions.
He's dismissal comes after a longstanding personal and professional relationship with Xi.
Xi and He both served in the local government of Fujian province in the 1990s and 2000s, with He promoted to "full general" — the highest military rank — in 2017 and eventually co-vice chairman in 2022.
It's a position that granted him more than just command of the military. It also made him a member of the elite Politburo — the top decision-making body of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP).
His sudden fall just three years into the role underscores the intensity of internal instability within the CCP.
Despite projecting a unified public image, the highest level of China's political system is a pressure cooker of competing ambitions, ideological divides, and factional loyalties.
Xi's leadership has been marked by a relentless consolidation of power and a sweeping anti-corruption campaign, but the frequent removal of his own appointees suggests cracks in the system he has built.
Xi's gamble amid political uncertainty
The timing of He's disappearance could be politically charged.
In August, the 4th Plenary Session of the 20th Central Committee is scheduled to take place — a key meeting where leadership direction is often recalibrated behind closed doors.
It is precisely during such sensitive periods that purges are most common, either as a pre-emptive strike or a signal of discipline.
The disappearance of He also exposes the fragility in China's defence system at a time when Beijing is expanding its military footprint and increasing its defence budget.
The People's Liberation Army (PLA) has been conducting joint air and naval exercises in the South China Sea, a move likely aimed at both foreign and domestic audiences.
On one hand, the drills serve as a warning to neighbouring countries and the United States.
On the other, they reinforce the narrative of a combat-ready PLA under Xi's direct control.
Military strength and political authority go hand in hand in China, and Xi's tightening grip on the armed forces is as much about addressing internal rot as external deterrence.
Purges at such moments are rarely about a single person.
Since 2023, at least three senior generals have been removed from their posts — including two defence ministers hand-picked by Xi — as part of a broader campaign targeting entrenched corruption and disloyalty within the ranks.
But in He's case, the removal may have been less about personal wrongdoing and more about managing factional rivalry and consolidating political control.
While no-one knows exactly why He was purged, his downfall serves as a warning that even those within Xi's own circle are not immune.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73672
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23203238 (190916ZJUN25) Notable: Anthony Albanese seeks window for Trump sit-down - Anthony Albanese has left the door open for a last-minute dash to The Hague next week as he continues to seek his first face-to-face meeting with Donald Trump at the NATO leaders’ summit after the US President ditched their G7 talks. The Prime Minister was blindsided on Tuesday when the President cancelled their meeting and departed the G7 early following an escalation of the Israel-Iran war, forcing Mr Albanese to make his long-awaited pitch on the need for the US to lift its tariffs on Australian products to Mr Trump’s economic officials instead. After sitting down with US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer, National Economic Council director Kevin Hassett, and US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent on Wednesday (AEST), Mr Albanese revealed he had not heard from Mr Trump directly since the cancellation of their meeting, despite other leaders such as Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum having received a call from the President. Mr Albanese - who is under pressure from the Coalition for being unable to progress his relationship with Mr Trump and secure wins on tariff exemptions and the long-term future of the $368bn AUKUS deal – said he had had discussions with a range of people in recent days including NATO secretary-general Mark Rutte. The Australian understands that several meeting scenarios are being explored and that Mr Albanese would not attend the NATO summit if there was no chance of a meeting. Should Mr Albanese attend NATO, the Labor leader would be exposed to the debate on what countries should be spending on defence, relative to GDP, with Australia having resisted calls from the US so far to lift spending to 3.5 per cent of GDP.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73662
>>73666
Anthony Albanese seeks window for Trump sit-down
GEOFF CHAMBERS - 18 June 2025
1/2
Anthony Albanese has left the door open for a last-minute dash to The Hague next week as he continues to seek his first face-to-face meeting with Donald Trump at the NATO leaders’ summit after the US President ditched their G7 talks.
The Prime Minister was blindsided on Tuesday when the President cancelled their meeting and departed the G7 early following an escalation of the Israel-Iran war, forcing Mr Albanese to make his long-awaited pitch on the need for the US to lift its tariffs on Australian products to Mr Trump’s economic officials instead.
After sitting down with US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer, National Economic Council director Kevin Hassett, and US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent on Wednesday (AEST), Mr Albanese revealed he had not heard from Mr Trump directly since the cancellation of their meeting, despite other leaders such as Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum having received a call from the President.
While failing to make material progress with the US on issues surrounding AUKUS and tariffs, Mr Albanese was able to make headway on a security and defence partnership with the European Union, which had come as a surprise to the Labor leader when first raised with him in Rome earlier this year.
Just 24 hours after Mr Albanese said he expected Defence Minister Richard Marles would attend the upcoming NATO summit in the Netherlands, the 62-year-old said he was now considering attending the two-day NATO heads of state and government meeting mid-next week, rather than wait for a meeting with Mr Trump at the UN leaders’ summit in New York, scheduled in September.
Mr Albanese – who is under pressure from the Coalition for being unable to progress his relationship with Mr Trump and secure wins on tariff exemptions and the long-term future of the $368bn AUKUS deal – said he had had discussions with a range of people in recent days including NATO secretary-general Mark Rutte.
The Australian understands that several meeting scenarios are being explored and that Mr Albanese would not attend the NATO summit if there was no chance of a meeting. Should Mr Albanese attend NATO, the Labor leader would be exposed to the debate on what countries should be spending on defence, relative to GDP, with Australia having resisted calls from the US so far to lift spending to 3.5 per cent of GDP.
As White House officials sought to fill the void Mr Trump left at the G7 summit in Kananaskis, Mr Albanese and US ambassador Kevin Rudd met for 20 minutes with Mr Greer and Mr Hassett, who is the US President’s principal economic adviser. The group held another 20-minute meeting that included Mr Bessent.
The meetings, not open to the media and initially kept under wraps, allowed Mr Albanese to put forward the case for tariff exemptions and plans to unlock Australia’s vast critical minerals and rare earths reserves in partnership with the US. Mr Albanese said he made the point clearly to the economic officials that the US-Australia free trade agreement had delivered for both countries, with the US enjoying a trade surplus over more than two decades.
“It was a real opportunity to meet three of the President’s senior economic team together,” he said. “We’ll continue to engage constructively.”
Concerns about the Pentagon’s snap 30-day review into the AUKUS nuclear submarine deal and US calls for Australia to lift its defence spending were not raised with Mr Trump’s economic officials, Mr Albanese said.
British Prime Minister Keir Starmer, in a meeting with his Australian counterpart, told Mr Albanese they would take co-_operation on defence, security and the AUKUS deal to “another level”. A day after landing a major trade deal with Mr Trump and winning assurances from him on the AUKUS pact, Sir Keir said the bilateral relationship between Australia and the UK “could not be stronger in my view”.
“We’ve both taken it on ourselves to take it to another level when it comes to defence and security, to our work on AUKUS, but also on issues like energy and the global issues that matter,” Sir Keir said. “We think alike, we work alike and we have a shared agendas to work together.”
Mr Albanese said of the UK that there was “no relationship more important than the one between our two great nations”.
He said the defence relationship and AUKUS partnership with Britain were “so important”.
“I travelled up to Barrow (in the UK) and saw first-hand what is happening there (with the nuclear submarines),” Mr Albanese said.
He praised Sir Keir for his government’s leadership on supporting Ukraine in its war with Russia.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73673
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23203256 (190931ZJUN25) Notable: Kunafa chef charged for chanting ‘All Zionists are terrorists’ at pro-Palestinian rallies - Victoria Police will argue in court that chanting “all Zionists are terrorists” in public is anti-Semitic and effectively brands the majority of Jewish Australians as such, in a major legal test of hate speech laws targeting pro-Palestinian activists. Summary of statement documents obtained by The Australian reveal Victoria Police deemed the controversial chant “anti-Semitic” and considered the use of it as an “affront” to the Jewish community while pressing charges against activists. The documents concern charging kunafa chef Jad Awwad Abu Alsendyan under Section 17(1) of the state’s Summary Offences Act - which prohibits profane, indecent or obscene language – for allegedly saying “all Zionists are terrorists” at pro-Palestinian rallies. If proven, the crime is punishable with two months’ prison for the first offence, three months for the second, and six months for three or more. Mr Alsendyan, who owns the popular Kunafeh House food truck, is facing two charges. The 48-year-old activist is widely regarded in Melbourne’s Middle Eastern community for making Nablus-style kunafa (Palestinian dessert). Police allege Mr Alsendyan led the chant during the Protest Until Ceasefire rally in Melbourne’s CBD on April 6, using a megaphone to amplify the slogan. Detectives say they relied on footage shared by pro-Palestinian groups online to identify him and other participants.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73553
>>73626
>>73628
Kunafa chef charged for chanting ‘All Zionists are terrorists’ at pro-Palestinian rallies
MOHAMMAD ALFARES - 18 June 2025
Victoria Police will argue in court that chanting “all Zionists are terrorists” in public is anti-Semitic and effectively brands the majority of Jewish Australians as such, in a major legal test of hate speech laws targeting pro-Palestinian activists.
Summary of statement documents obtained by The Australian reveal Victoria Police deemed the controversial chant “anti-Semitic” and considered the use of it as an “affront” to the Jewish community while pressing charges against activists.
The documents concern charging kunafa chef Jad Awwad Abu Alsendyan under Section 17(1) of the state’s Summary Offences Act – which prohibits profane, indecent or obscene language – for allegedly saying “all Zionists are terrorists” at pro-Palestinian rallies.
If proven, the crime is punishable with two months’ prison for the first offence, three months for the second, and six months for three or more.
Mr Alsendyan, who owns the popular Kunafeh House food truck, is facing two charges.
The 48-year-old activist is widely regarded in Melbourne’s Middle Eastern community for making Nablus-style kunafa (Palestinian dessert).
Police allege Mr Alsendyan led the chant during the Protest Until Ceasefire rally in Melbourne’s CBD on April 6, using a megaphone to amplify the slogan. Detectives say they relied on footage shared by pro-Palestinian groups online to identify him and other participants.
“During the march, the accused was walking at the head of the march with a megaphone,” the informant’s summary states.
“The accused chanted ‘all Zionists are terrorists’ a total of three times, encouraging the protest group to chant in unison by saying ‘Louder!’
“The chant ‘all Zionists are terrorists’ was deemed to be anti-Semitic and offensive language as it categorises the majority of the Australian Jewish community as terrorists, seen as an affront to that community.”
Speaking to Mr Alsendyan, detectives asked him how he would define the chant.
“Everyone in the protest, they chant. So all the thousands of people they chant,” he said.
“We didn’t say anything bad. We didn’t attack any person or any religion or any country.”
The conflation between Zionism and anti-Semitism has been a flashpoint in public discourse since October 2023, complicating debates around the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and freedom of speech in Australia.
Pro-Palestinian supporters argue that Zionism is a settler-colonial ideology that led to the displacement of Palestinians in 1948 (the Nakba). They see it as the driving force behind the establishment of Israel on land they consider historically Palestinian. But mainstream Jewish organisations in Australia argue that activists had been hiding behind the “Zionist” euphemism to vilify Jews.
Mr Alsendyan told The Australian he planned on camping outside the Melbourne Magistrates Court until his case was heard later this month.
Rule of Law Institute of Australia vice-president Chris Merritt said the decision by police to use the Summary Offences Act raised the question of why it was not used earlier.
“This act has been on the statute books since 1966 and imposes jail time for public threats, abuse and insults – conduct that is now a regular occurrence on the streets of Melbourne,” Mr Merritt said.
“It has a much broader reach than Victoria’s recently enacted anti-vilification law, which appears incapable of protecting Zionists from vilification.
“But Zionism, or support for the Jewish homeland, is a political belief that is not determined by race or religion. And vilification on the basis of political belief is not one of the new law’s protected attributes.”
He said while the Summary Offences Act carried lesser penalties, it was not restricted by definitions based on race, religion or other specific characteristics.
It is understood a total of five activists have been charged by Victoria Police for using the chant.
https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/kunafa-chef-charged-for-chanting-all-zionists-are-terrorists-at-propalestinian-rallies/news-story/0abef29f892f6e5db8c4477effb67c30
https://www.instagram.com/kunafehhouse/
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73674
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23203273 (190943ZJUN25) Notable: Iranian ambassador Ahmad Sadeghi calls on Anthony Albanese to condemn Israel, issues warning to Donald Trump - Iran's ambassador to Australia, Ahmad Sadeghi, has called on Prime Minister Anthony Albanese to condemn Israel's strikes on the Middle Eastern nation and denied that the Islamic Republic is working on a nuclear weapons program. Mr Sadeghi made the comments to 7.30 during a wide-ranging interview where he also refused to recognise Israel's right to exist as a state and warned US President Donald Trump there may be consequences for 80,000 US troops stationed in the Persian Gulf if the US strikes Iranian targets. Mr Sadeghi described Israel's June 13 attack on Iranian targets - that has seen a reported 224 people there killed — as "unprovoked". Since then, there have been a reported 24 casualties in Israel as a result of Iranian retaliatory strikes, with civilians dying on both sides. Mr Sadeghi defended the Iranian response as "its inalienable right to just defensive measures", before he called on Mr Albanese to condemn Israel for the June 13 attack that has pushed the Middle East to the brink of a wider conflict. "We ask Australia, as a friendly nation that we are in the good relation with, they have to condemn," Mr Sadeghi told 7.30. Asked if that meant a public condemnation of Israel from the Albanese government, the Iranian ambassador said: "Yes, I ask them."
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73649
>>73651
>>73662
Iranian ambassador Ahmad Sadeghi calls on Anthony Albanese to condemn Israel, issues warning to Donald Trump
Paul Johnson - 18 June 2025
1/2
Iran's ambassador to Australia, Ahmad Sadeghi, has called on Prime Minister Anthony Albanese to condemn Israel's strikes on the Middle Eastern nation and denied that the Islamic Republic is working on a nuclear weapons program.
Mr Sadeghi made the comments to 7.30 during a wide-ranging interview where he also refused to recognise Israel's right to exist as a state and warned US President Donald Trump there may be consequences for 80,000 US troops stationed in the Persian Gulf if the US strikes Iranian targets.
Mr Sadeghi described Israel's June 13 attack on Iranian targets — that has seen a reported 224 people there killed — as "unprovoked".
Since then, there have been a reported 24 casualties in Israel as a result of Iranian retaliatory strikes, with civilians dying on both sides.
Mr Sadeghi defended the Iranian response as "its inalienable right to just defensive measures", before he called on Mr Albanese to condemn Israel for the June 13 attack that has pushed the Middle East to the brink of a wider conflict.
"You have to have the punishment of the aggressor," Mr Sadeghi told 7.30.
"If you let it go unpunished [and] the prime minister of this regime [Benjamin Netanyahu] declared publicly and arrogantly that 'I ordered such an attack against Iran'.
"If you just let them go free, it has very bad consequences."
Asked by 7.30 host David Speers if that meant "condemnation," Mr Sadeghi responded "exactly".
"We ask Australia, as a friendly nation that we are in the good relation with, they have to condemn."
Asked if that meant a public condemnation of Israel from the Albanese government, the Iranian ambassador said: "Yes, I ask them."
Warning issued to Trump
As he asked for Australia to condemn Israel's actions, which began with attacks on Iranian nuclear sites, Mr Sadeghi issued a warning about possible US involvement.
Israel's original strikes targeted Iranian nuclear facilities at Natanz, Sifahan, and Fordow, and several scientists involved in nuclear research and development, reflecting Israel's fears about Iran's nuclear program and potential capability to soon produce nuclear weapons.
But the Fordow site is deep underground, and it has been suggested that only US bunker-busting bombs could breach it.
Mr Trump has so far avoided getting the US directly involved but has called for Iran's "unconditional surrender" and warned Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei that the US will not kill him "for now".
"We know exactly where the so-called 'Supreme Leader' is hiding," Mr Trump posted on Truth Social. "He is an easy target, but is safe there — we are not going to take him out (kill!), at least not for now.
"But we don't want missiles shot at civilians or American soldiers. Our patience is wearing thin. Thank you for your attention to this matter!"
Mr Sadeghi told 7.30 that Iran was "fully prepared" to negotiate but warned that US military involvement could lead to a wider conflict.
"The Mr Trump … character … he was supposed to be a man of peace, now he's come to man of war," Mr Sadeghi said.
"Around 80,000 US personnel are in the Persian Gulf area; they may not be as comfortable as much as now.
"The other Islamic nations around … in Pakistan, Afghanistan, Iraq — if Iran would be attacked by US, they wouldn't be silent.
"We advise Mr Trump to [not] be dragged into an unwanted war that Netanyahu is going to make. Netanyahu is notorious to put the burden of [his] own unjust war on shoulder of the other players.
"I ask Mr Trump to be very careful about that."
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73675
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23203311 (191018ZJUN25) Notable: Armoured cars, ferries: How Australians are fleeing the Middle East - Australians are resorting to chartering armoured cars and ferries to flee Israel, or sheltering in place in Iran, as Australia’s embassies scramble to organise evacuations in a region where flights are not operating and conflict is escalating. Almost 3000 Australians have registered to be evacuated out of Israel and Iran, representing a near doubling in the number of people seeking to flee for each day the conflict has continued, and some have accused the government’s response of being “delinquent”. At least two buses have already left Israel for Jordan with Australians on board, including one organised by insurers and the other by the government, but others are paying private companies for evacuation via armoured car or ferries to Cyprus. Wong told ABC News Breakfast on Thursday the missile strikes between Israel and Iran made the situation difficult because they made it impossible to conduct evacuation flights. “It’s a very, very difficult situation on the ground at the moment,” Wong said. “Obviously, there are more opportunities [to evacuate people] in relation to Israel. We took the opportunity to get a small group out across by land crossing yesterday. And we’ll seek to continue that … Iran is a very complicated situation, a very risky situation.” Airspace over the region has been closed since June 13, after Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu launched dozens of missile attacks on Iranian targets with the aim of ending the expansion of its nuclear weapons development program. Iran has since retaliated.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73651
>>73658
>>73662
Armoured cars, ferries: How Australians are fleeing the Middle East
Olivia Ireland - June 19, 2025
1/2
Australians are resorting to chartering armoured cars and ferries to flee Israel, or sheltering in place in Iran, as Australia’s embassies scramble to organise evacuations in a region where flights are not operating and conflict is escalating.
Almost 3000 Australians have registered to be evacuated out of Israel and Iran, representing a near doubling in the number of people seeking to flee for each day the conflict has continued, and some have accused the government’s response of being “delinquent”.
At least two buses have already left Israel for Jordan with Australians on board, including one organised by insurers and the other by the government, but others are paying private companies for evacuation via armoured car or ferries to Cyprus.
Wong told ABC News Breakfast on Thursday the missile strikes between Israel and Iran made the situation difficult because they made it impossible to conduct evacuation flights.
“It’s a very, very difficult situation on the ground at the moment,” Wong said. “Obviously, there are more opportunities [to evacuate people] in relation to Israel. We took the opportunity to get a small group out across by land crossing yesterday. And we’ll seek to continue that … Iran is a very complicated situation, a very risky situation.”
Airspace over the region has been closed since June 13, after Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu launched dozens of missile attacks on Iranian targets with the aim of ending the expansion of its nuclear weapons development program. Iran has since retaliated.
Governments’ struggles to evacuate citizens have spurred demand for private exit routes. Earlier this week tour groups of Jewish Australians co-ordinated to join a ferry to evacuate from Haifa to Cyprus.
US medical and security response company Global Rescue also reported a spike in requests from people who would have to pay thousands for their rescue.
The company’s associate director Harding Bush said one Australian in Israel was driven by private security guards in an armoured SUV to the country’s eastern border where a Jordanian team picked him up and took him to the airport.
Evacuations of this kind were executed all week from Israel, Bush said, as well as some from Iran that proved to be more difficult.
“As soon as airspace shuts, while governments are still figuring out how to organise group evacuations, we tend to get stranded travellers searching us on the internet, because there’s no other way to get out,” he said.
David Morris, a Jewish Australian executive from Sydney, is one of the many stuck in Jerusalem along with his wife since the attacks, spending hours each night in their hotel’s safe room.
Morris said he was frustrated by the lack of information from DFAT, which has told Australians to make their own assessments about the safety of leaving Israel.
“We can’t make our own assessments because we have no information,” he said. “I’m sitting in the hotel room and I’m going to use social media to make an assessment?”
On Tuesday, Morris received an email from the department asking if he wanted to make a land crossing to Jordan via a private bus.
The email said “you will be responsible for your onward travel after arrival in Jordan”.
Despite responding “yes”, Morris said he received no reply.
“This is really unacceptable and the Australian government is delinquent in the way they are managing this situation,” Morris said, questioning why there was not more proactive support available to evacuate citizens once they reach Jordan.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73676
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23212682 (210823ZJUN25) Notable: Video: Australian embassy staff in Tehran rushed out of Iran amid fears of bigger conflict in the Middle East - The federal government has suspended its embassy in Iran and rushed out Australian diplomats in Tehran across the border into Azerbaijan as fears of a major war in the Middle East continue to mount. It is also ramping up its warnings to Australians in Iran, urging them to make their own way out of the country by road if they can safely do so. Foreign Minister Penny Wong said the government had directed the departure of all Australian officials and dependents and suspended operations at its embassy in Tehran based on advice about "the deteriorating security environment in Iran". She warned the situation was volatile. "The government has a responsibility to ensure the safety of our staff … we do not have to cast our minds back too far in history to understand the risk to foreign officials in Iran in times of unrest," Senator Wong said. The ABC has been told that Australian diplomats - along with family members — spent almost 24 hours travelling by car to get out of the country as Israel and Iran continue to trade strikes, and as President Donald Trump contemplates US military action against Tehran. At least some of those Tehran-based diplomats are expected to stay in place near the Iran-Azerbaijan border as they work to evacuate more Australians from Iran. The minister said she was conscious that the embassy's closure would add to difficulties for Australians seeking to leave the country, but said staff continued to work on contingency plans for when Iran's airspace reopened.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73658
>>73675
Australian embassy staff in Tehran rushed out of Iran amid fears of bigger conflict in the Middle East
Stephen Dziedzic - 20 June 2025
1/2
The federal government has suspended its embassy in Iran and rushed out Australian diplomats in Tehran across the border into Azerbaijan as fears of a major war in the Middle East continue to mount.
It is also ramping up its warnings to Australians in Iran, urging them to make their own way out of the country by road if they can safely do so.
Foreign Minister Penny Wong said the government had directed the departure of all Australian officials and dependents and suspended operations at its embassy in Tehran based on advice about "the deteriorating security environment in Iran".
She warned the situation was volatile.
"The government has a responsibility to ensure the safety of our staff ... we do not have to cast our minds back too far in history to understand the risk to foreign officials in Iran in times of unrest," Senator Wong said.
The ABC has been told that Australian diplomats — along with family members — spent almost 24 hours travelling by car to get out of the country as Israel and Iran continue to trade strikes, and as President Donald Trump contemplates US military action against Tehran.
At least some of those Tehran-based diplomats are expected to stay in place near the Iran-Azerbaijan border as they work to evacuate more Australians from Iran.
The minister said she was conscious that the embassy's closure would add to difficulties for Australians seeking to leave the country, but said staff continued to work on contingency plans for when Iran's airspace reopened.
"We are really conscious it is difficult. I wish it were not so, I wish that we had more capacity to assist, but the difficult reality is the situation on the ground is extremely unstable," Senator Wong said.
Foreign embassies have been repeatedly targeted before during crises in Iran, most famously during the 1979 Revolution when US diplomats were taken hostage.
In 2006, paramilitary groups attacked the Danish embassy in Tehran to protest cartoons of Prophet Mohammad in a Danish newspaper, while Azerbaijan's embassy was attacked in January this year.
Senator Wong hoped the embassy would be able to reopen.
More urgent warnings for Australians
The Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade (DFAT) is also now issuing more urgent warnings to Australians in Iran, saying that it "urge[s] Australians who want to leave Iran to do so now, if it is safe".
"Australians in Iran who are unable to leave, or do not wish to leave, are advised to shelter in place," it said.
Just over 2,000 Australian citizens, permanent residents and their immediate family members have now registered with the federal government to say they want to leave Iran.
The travel advice tells Australians they can potentially leave by road to Türkiye, Armenia, Azerbaijan and Turkmenistan, but also warns roads "may be crowded and exposed to security risks such as military action, rocket attacks and terrorism".
"You should consider the risks carefully before attempting to leave by any route and you should make your own assessment whether it's safe for you to travel in current circumstances," it said.
"If you are not confident in the safety and reliability of any departure option, shelter in place and follow the advice of local authorities."
The advice also said Australians would need a visa to cross most of those borders, with the exception of Armenia.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
d8af2a No.73677
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23212691 (210831ZJUN25) Notable: Albanese government to evacuate Australians stranded in the Middle East amid Iran-Israel war - The Albanese government has shuttered the nation’s embassy in Iran and launched a major operation to evacuate Australian citizens from the Middle East, as US President Donald Trump granted Tehran a two-week window to abandon its nuclear program before he decides whether to launch US strikes on the country. Mr Trump said he believed there was a “substantial chance of negotiations” with Tehran, sparking a fresh European push for a diplomatic solution to the conflict in talks with Iran’s foreign minister in Switzerland. The evacuation mission, announced amid ongoing strikes between Israel and Iran on Friday AEST, includes the deployment of two RAAF passenger airlifters together with air force and army personnel and the relocation of consular staff to Azerbaijan to support Australians fleeing across the border from Iran. More than 2000 Australians and their family members are seeking help to leave Iran, while another 1200 have sought evacuation from Israel. Foreign Minister Penny Wong said the mission, dubbed Operation Beech, was currently unable to airlift Australians from either country but the government was preparing plans for the reopening of the region’s airspace. She said the decision to order the evacuation of Australian diplomats from Tehran was not taken lightly and the nation’s ambassador, Ian McConville, would remain in the region to support the government’s response to the unfolding crisis.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73658
>>73675
>>73676
Albanese government to evacuate Australians stranded in the Middle East amid Iran-Israel war
BEN PACKHAM and SARAH ISON - 20 June 2025
The Albanese government has shuttered the nation’s embassy in Iran and launched a major operation to evacuate Australian citizens from the Middle East, as US President Donald Trump granted Tehran a two-week window to abandon its nuclear program before he decides whether to launch US strikes on the country.
Mr Trump said he believed there was a “substantial chance of negotiations” with Tehran, sparking a fresh European push for a diplomatic solution to the conflict in talks with Iran’s foreign minister in Switzerland.
The evacuation mission, announced amid ongoing strikes between Israel and Iran on Friday AEST, includes the deployment of two RAAF passenger airlifters together with air force and army personnel and the relocation of consular staff to Azerbaijan to support Australians fleeing across the border from Iran.
More than 2000 Australians and their family members are seeking help to leave Iran, while another 1200 have sought evacuation from Israel.
Foreign Minister Penny Wong said the mission, dubbed Operation Beech, was currently unable to airlift Australians from either country but the government was preparing plans for the reopening of the region’s airspace.
She said the decision to order the evacuation of Australian diplomats from Tehran was not taken lightly and the nation’s ambassador, Ian McConville, would remain in the region to support the government’s response to the unfolding crisis.
“It is a decision based on the deteriorating security environment in Iran; a decision I directed after consultation with the Prime Minister and the Deputy Prime Minister,” Senator Wong said.
“We urge Australians who are able to leave Iran to do so now if it is safe. Those who are not able to do so or who do not wish to leave are advised to shelter in place.”
She revealed she had a phone call overnight on Thursday with her US counterpart Marco Rubio, who said Mr Trump’s two-week window for Iran had opened the way for “de-escalation, dialogue and diplomacy”.
In a statement read by White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt, the President said: “Based on the fact that there’s a substantial chance of negotiations that may or may not take place with Iran in the near future, I will make my decision whether or not to go within the next two weeks.”
The pause followed days of escalating rhetoric by Mr Trump, who had warned the US was preparing for a “total and complete victory” unless Tehran agreed to an unconditional surrender.
The President has been weighing the use of US “bunker buster” bombs to destroy Iran’s underground Fordow uranium-enrichment facility as the US masses air and naval power in the Middle East to support potential combat operations and protect US personnel in the region.
Late on Friday AEST, the White House was waiting on the results of talks between the British, French, German and EU foreign ministers, and their Iranian counterpart, Abbas Araghchi.
UK Foreign Secretary David Lammy – who met with Mr Rubio in the White House on Thursday to discuss the unfolding situation – said it was time to bring the conflict to an end.
“A window now exists within the next two weeks to achieve a diplomatic solution,” he said.
“Now is the time to put a stop to the grave scenes in the Middle East and prevent a regional escalation that would benefit no one.“
Israel on Friday struck Iranian targets with 60 fighter jets, hitting a nuclear research facility and multiple missile production sites.
“These sites were built over years and were the industrial centre of gravity of the Iranian Ministry of Defence,” the Israel Defence Forces said.
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said his military had destroyed at least half of Iran’s missile launchers while also eliminating key military leaders and paramilitary forces.
https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/pm-launches-operation-bring-em-home/news-story/6fcaaf980d23f7a0daa9661cdb52c0d7
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.