>>13658327
"You support importing criminals under humanitarian reasons."
1. Well that is generally what the current "left" (actually liberals) want. Historically leftists were against immigration because it lead to brain drain. E.g East Germans weren't allowed to go to West Germany because that would mean that East Germany would face a decline in productivity. Today's "leftists" by allowing mass immigration in the West simply end up serving the class interests of the bourgeoisie, who 1. want the influx of cheap labour into their country and/or 2. also want the depletion of the skilled/rich labour aristocracy (particularly doctors and engineers) of the third world so that it can remain in cyclical weakness even after colonialism. What the white bourgeoisie fears the most is a competent rival from the places they once had plundered to the ground (E.g Gaddafi's Libya, Sankara's Burkina Faso).
2. There's a reason why the most educated third worlders don't live in the third world, they simply escape. If the West didn't allow them in so easily, maybe they would've stayed and actually, to improve their conditions, also worked towards bettering their country. Instead their countries have devolved into cronyism with income inequalities worse than even during colonial times (E.g India).
"They spike crime rates, are a waste of taxpayer money."
Kinda not true because immigrants (in the U.S) are known to commit less crimes than born citizens (https://www.congress.gov/119/meeting/house/117980/documents/HHRG-119-GO00-20250305-SD029.pdf). They also pay more in taxes (and also cannot vote).
The only real dirt right wingers/third positionists have on immigrants is the fact that, well, they dilute their "culture", which is true. It does not appear as "bad" though to the cosmopolitan leftists in the West. Of course as a leftist myself, my goals are internationalist at the very end, but the current route that the left has taken is not even beneficial to the third world.
"Those rich third worlders carry poor traditions with them."
1. Here, what is stopping me from saying "Who are you to call certain traditions 'poor'".
2. Rich third worlders are often called "coconuts" by their fellow kind. Meaning they may be brown on the outside but larp as a white person. It's not the rich third worlders who don't assimilate. It's usually always the cheap laborers who are imported from the depths of the global south on boats who not only don't assimilate but also are the ones seen committing crimes.