>>13649375
But what does this all mean? Well, first of all, if China and Russia have similar technology, they'll be forced to reveal it too. Not doing so would make them appear weak, unable to stand up to the United States. I assume both countries already have that technology, even if it's not as effective or advanced as the United States'. Opposingly, countries which lack these capacities will be forced to side with one for protection, becoming vassal states at best. Of course, a few power hungry and stupid rulers will think their AK-47s and rocket launches will be enough to face that. They're walking corpses. Either way, the days of "Fuck the American pigs" in Latin America are done. They can't do anything to stop them. The cartels must be panicking right now. They thought they were the shit with the M16s and tanks and RPGs the CIA armed them with. Those with an ounce of brains will soon realize they have pea shooters. They're completely fucked.
Europe is gonna have to reevaluate its position in the world. I very much doubt that any country in Europe has developed such military technology. And if Russia has it, the only ones who can and will defend them are the Americans, which means they'll have to do whatever the Americans tell them to or deal with Russia. Denmark in particular will have to admit it can't defend Greenland in the eventuality of Russian aggression. As for Canada, I honestly don't know. It's even more fucked that Europe if you ask me.
So we're going to see a paradigm shift where the United States, Russia and China dominate world politics. Countries will try to curry favor with them in exchange for their resources and obedience. Those that don't will just be conquered, whether overtly or not. Hope you're all ready for a new world order.