/pol/ - Politically Incorrect

According to American government the jet fuel burned so hot that it compromised the structure of the building.

They don't mention that the firefighter Orio Palmer got to said impact floor and radioed his firetruck and told them that there were only minor fires there.

911 COP Who Arrested The "Dancing Israelis" - First Interview

https://odysee.com/@Per_h:3/New-Jersey-Cop-Scott-DeCarlo-Who-Arrested-Mossad-on-911:b

Original ABC report about the "Dancing Israelis" on 911

https://odysee.com/@last_german:6/twittervid.com_psyop4921_66ef53:4

https://www.bollyn.com/911/

>>13644233

Stop being a anti-scientism bigot fren. Everyone knows the dancing Israelis operated the charges from their uhaul van. It looked something like this.

>>13644284

This is a valid question.

(The building was dilapidated, it’s why the port authority sold it to the luckiest man in the known world. All the beams long had their fireproof coatings desiccated and fallen from the crucial structural points by the time the insurance fraud ff happened. Also it had a lot of asbestos in it which would of cost way more to remove than the property was worth. It was more expedient having a bush contractor come in months prior to the deep event and placing military grade nano thermite shape charges at every structural load bearing joint with wireless detonators all linked to the urban moving van, Probably, possibly. Those towers main support was the internal square not the outer exterior with windows and so many floors were completely empty. Most of the crucial evidence was carted off by the then newly fake us gov and all its willing “shabbas goyim” traitors or useful idiots. Most of it went to china to be melted down, at least that was the story everyone was told as the cleanup crews operated 3 shifts with dump trucks to remove the debris quick so the “goyim” didn’t ask questions about the nano thermite still smoldering in a lot places. It’s possible that some of the structural evidence made it past the ff scrub operation but who knows.)

>>13644291

"Goodness without boundaries is nothing but an open invitation for exploitation."

>>13644389

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZeFnQyLL8I4

Most people don’t know that passports are indestructible, one could make a fire proof suit from a collection of them lol. On a more serious note, it was a continuation or rehash of operation northwoods. Which all of this was set in motion prior to 2001 as the constitutional debt contract was allowed to lapse after it’s third and final 70yr international bankruptcy cycle in 1999. This meant that there was no active agreement between the American people and its then fake gov. This is why you hear them harp on and on about their nwo stuff cause they no longer had to abide by any constitutional restraints. This also explains the steady decline of the country as the folks running the fake gov moved further and further from what made a america actually powerful and great. Fix the money, end the fed!

>>13644501

Although i don’t doubt occultism and such was involved with the nation in the beginning i still believe that what you are saying is very defeatist. A lot of the founders were not jews and despised jews having had to deal with them a lot as the crown used them as go betweens a lot still do lol. so much so that most of British aristocracy is quite jewish apparently when real blood lines are studied. Hamilton was a jew hence why he pushed for a central bank lol. Franklin was a triple agent(france, america, england) although he didn’t write the constitution directly he played a crucial role in the drafting of the founding document. He had no intention of telling all the other founders outside the inner circle what grammar fiction was and how it looked like it said one thing but allowed the bearer of the contract to do something else. No one alive today is partied to the us constitution hence why you can’t use it to defend yourself in court, you have to use the bill of rights. The musings of cryptographer and folks that just got done fighting a war and then having your adversary being the underwriter for your constitutional debt contract. The first constitutional bankruptcy cycle apparently ended in 1859 which resulted in renegotiation, Im left to assume this was one of the main motivators of the civil war although well concealed for obvious reasons.

>>13644264

Unbelievable. You whigger tards are still talking about those Israeli decoys planted there by the CIA and Mossad 24 years later. Truly pathetic.

>>13644521

>>Also, it's important to note our Founding Fathers despised central banking and supported a gold and silver standard, they explicitly warned us NOT to do nearly everything we have been doing the last 100 years!

This.

“England may have not won the physical military struggle due to geographical and seafaring restraints but ultimately regained control of america via alexander hamilton lavine(redshield trained banker) via the first national bank, which was a disaster for the American people. Although much of the info on it has been edited by the kikes which is to help obfuscate who really owns the fed I'm sure lol. the real reason the charter wasn’t renewed was because those “foreigner investors” were the crown corporation lol. Although this is what wiki says for obvious present repeating reasons.

“The First Bank of the United States ended because Congress chose not to renew its 20-year charter when it expired in 1811.”

Jefferson knew the national bank was unconstitutional and because it was modeled on the bank of England itself and it opened america up to “having war waged upon it via deception”.

So as Americans watch the tyranny in the uk now increase, they need to understand stand under the idea that if the us corporate gov doesn’t get rid of the fed, then the uk’s shitty tyranny future is americas future cause both countries are linked at the hip and have been for a very long time.

Our histories are very manipulated:

“This debate was central to the opposition, with Secretary of State Thomas Jefferson advocating for a strict interpretation of the Constitution, while Treasury Secretary Alexander Hamilton argued for a broader interpretation that allowed for implied powers. The bank's private ownership and its role in issuing currency that competed with state bank notes also fueled resentment. After the Republican Party gained control of the White House in 1800, support for the bank waned, and when the time came to renew the charter, Congress rejected the renewal by a single vote. The lack of a central bank following its closure contributed to financial instability, which eventually led to the creation of the Second Bank of the United States in 1816.“

“Implied powers”- kinda like the chevron doctrine which crushed American prosperity under insane redundant federal bureaucracies and runaway interpretations of fiction grammar laws/rules.

See this last part where the wiki quote talks about “financial instability created from lack of a central bank AUthority”. This is 100% malarkium cause as all Americans know firsthand by now these boom and bust cycles are created by the fiction bankers themselves intentionally to steal from people and pull their problem/reaction/tyrannical solution move they always do with their shite bills they get passed to (((fix))) a problem they themselves created. This is what happened after the first national bank got killed and they wanted or needed their next fiction banking fix. This is why the second national bank got created and then a civil war got fought after the first constitutional debt contract came to an end in 1859.

Americans need real money with no counter party risk or debt attached by bums. Also Americans need decentralized banking. Im sure those tech oligarchs meeting at the whitehouse just have everyones best interest in mind, just look at all the good they’ve done for the world lol.”

>>13644605

You know a lot about jewish holidays and ceremonies.

“Laws of Rescission

Rescission is a legal remedy that allows a party to cancel a contract, effectively rendering it void ab initio, with the goal of restoring the parties to their pre-contractual positions, known as the status quo ante. This remedy is typically available when a contract is tainted by a vitiating factor such as misrepresentation, mistake, duress, undue influence, or fraud. Rescission is an equitable remedy and is discretionary, meaning a court may decline to grant it if one party has affirmed the contract, a third party has acquired rights, or there has been substantial performance.

There are different types of rescission. Rescission by mutual consent occurs when both parties agree to terminate the contract willingly, which is common when neither party has performed or both wish to avoid litigation. Rescission for breach happens when one party fails to meet their obligations under the contract. Judicial rescission is granted by a court when legal intervention is necessary, often based on grounds like fraud, illegality, or public policy.

In consumer protection, specific laws grant a right of rescission. Under the federal Truth in Lending Act (TILA), borrowers have a right to rescind certain home loans, such as home equity lines of credit (HELOCs), within three business days of closing. The rescission period begins after the later of consummation, delivery of the required notice, or delivery of all material disclosures. If the required notice or disclosures are not delivered, the right to rescind expires three years after consummation, upon transfer of the property, or upon sale of the property, whichever occurs first. The consumer must notify the creditor of rescission by mail, telegram, or other written means, and the creditor must refund all fees and return any money or property within 20 calendar days of receiving the notice.

Rescission differs from termination, which only ends a contract prospectively, whereas rescission erases the contract entirely as if it never existed. For rescission to be granted, the party seeking it must generally offer to restore all benefits received under the contract, a process known as "restitutio in integrum". Courts may deny rescission if full restitution is impossible or inequitable. In insurance, rescission may be exercised by an insurer due to concealment, material misrepresentation, or a material breach of warranty, although federal law now requires proof of intent to deceive for health insurance policies.

The right to rescind may be lost if the contract is affirmed by the party's actions or if there is an unreasonable delay in exercising the right. In some jurisdictions, such as Virginia, the term "cancellation" is used for equitable rescission, while in others, like South Africa, "rescission" refers to overturning a court judgment. The specific laws and procedures for rescission vary by jurisdiction and contract type.“

>>13644231

NUKE

MECCA

NOW

KILL

THEM

ALL

GO

GO

GO

>>13644264

The Dancing Israelis were there "to document the event."

*Just like Zapruder in Dealey Plaza.*

“Today is the anniversary of the day when israel, zionists and us gov “shabbas goyim” false flagged america into fighting all its battles for it.”