[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / random / 93 / biohzrd / hkacade / hkpnd / tct / utd / uy / yebalnia ]

/philosophy/ - Philosophy

Start with the Greeks

Name
Email
Subject
REC
STOP
Comment *
File
Password (Randomized for file and post deletion; you may also set your own.)
Archive
Flag*
* = required field[▶Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.
Embed
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Options

Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webp,webm, mp4, mov, pdf
Max filesize is16 MB.
Max image dimensions are15000 x15000.
You may upload5 per post.


[ Literature ] [ E-books ] [ Politics ] [ Science ] [ Religion ]

File: b1c21506df93f91⋯.png (299.79 KB,610x480,61:48,9146c21e0d1e396226f611f618….png)

32749a No.6799

What are the similarities between them? As far as I can tell they criticise what it means to think and how we form our thought processes in life based on our experiences and sensations but there has to be other connections or maybe i'm inferring incorrectly?

____________________________
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

e24527 No.7596

He became important either because he corrected something or improved something or made significant progress of something.

He published Critique of Pure Reason. Is it because pure reason dominated Europe before and at his time?

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

374593 No.7630

>>7596

kritique means something else in german. He was not a critique of a concept called pure reason, he wrote about a concept called pure reason (among other things). Kant is an idealist meaning he thinks Ideas are prior to our experience of empirical reality. Hume was an empiricist meaning he thought our experience is prior to our ideas. IDK much about hume.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

374593 No.7631

File: 316a8a059f3e439⋯.png (72.14 KB,711x641,711:641,kant.png)

>>7630

in the last sentence I meant to say i dont know much about Locke, not hume.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

c280cd No.7632

>>7631

thank you so much for this!!

I was reading CPR and this was everything I need to see to comprehend this.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

645622 No.7633

Cunt and Hehel are gay

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

f8c72f No.7641

J Locke n David Hume represent empirical line in continental philosophy. For kant - hume was particularly interesting. Hume had awoken kant as he says from his dogmatic sleep. To be precise Hume epistemological skepticism is one thing that inspired kant in his critic work. I wont get in depth because i don't have time but Kant historically represents philosophical synthesis of previous rationalism(descartes,spinoza,lebnitz) and empiricism (locke,hume,bacon). If u need more in depth response i will gladly add it later cheers!

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.



[Return][Go to top][Catalog][Nerve Center][Random][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[]
[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / random / 93 / biohzrd / hkacade / hkpnd / tct / utd / uy / yebalnia ]