/niggwretchedness/ - Nigger Community Wretchedness

Although I will say. This might be too doxy, but I’ll say it because I just asked the robot and this could have happened in any number of places: I got stung by a scorpion last week. And I asked people: “Are these deadly?” The answer, unanimously, was “probably not but it’s possible.” And my answer was “yeah, okay. It doesn’t really matter.”

People tell me not to write about myself but I don’t know what else to write about because all of this other stuff seems so totally meaningless. NB4, “oh, so you’re the only thing that matters???” No, retard, but I’m not going to write about my friends and family. And in general, that is the only thing I think matters. Not me personally, but my personal life. And yours. Everyone’s. Unless it is someone I hate, in which case they don’t matter and I hope they die.

In general, there has been a personal and professional reckoning, where I have concluded that politics are completely without meaning. In short, “meaning” as a concept can only be personal, and personal meaning can exist or not under any political system. The danger we face now of course is an existential danger to humanity itself, where there exists a threat to completely erase humanity as a concept, replacing humans with cyborgs or whatever. Generally, this seems unlikely to actually occur. But it is a thing that people are finally talking about. I’ve been talking about it since before the Daily Stormer existed, before I was ever a “neo-Nazi white supremacist” or whatever stupid meme. I read and watched what these people were saying about transforming into a “post-human” form, and it just seemed obvious that this would be the goal of anyone with money. What else would they do with money, when they do not believe in God and the dream of eternal life is within reach?

Unlike myself, the sort who gets stung by a scorpion and says “yeah it doesn’t really make much difference if it kills me, I’m cool either way,” most people are very attached to life.

Nick Fuentes is out of the media now. People I know who don’t really even care that much about politics were contacting me like, “yo, what’s going on, why are they astroturfing this guy like this, what are they trying to do?” and I was like “um, this is, um, eh, it’s just, you know, kind of a boring story, really.” But the thing got too weird and so the media eventually dropped it. It’s possible he’s gone forever now, at least gone from that level of exposure, because he was just so unprepared to play that role. Being very quick on your feet when talking does not mean you’re able to formulate ideas, and telling him to go out and say everyone is a Russian agent and the FBI is totally telling the truth about Charlie Kirk, without giving it a definite script, turned out to be a complete disaster and basically everyone was disgusted by the whole charade. It’s possible that they will still use him as this kind of official opposition figure, I don’t know. They’re unlikely to find anyone more stable. One of their other guys recently released tapes of him having sex with men from Grindr. (I’m not going to tell that story, I’m sure anyone can look it up. Basically, an FBI antisemite guy released gay sex tapes because I guess he was being blackmailed. He also smokes meth, so maybe he just thought he was being blackmailed.)

But they’re not going to get me. Even all the people who hate me know I be like:

If you find yourself in a situation where antisemitism has become so mainstream that you need a controlled opposition antisemite to be plastered everywhere, Fuentes is the best you’re going to do. I would argue that the mistake was putting him on the Charlie Kirk case. It’s confusing what exactly they were even thinking. It could have been a pressure test, to see how capable he was of forwarding an extremely unpopular narrative, to see how moldable his followers were. But again, they don’t have some list of people lining up to take his place. The fact that you’re going to put yourself in the “public antisemite” space basically means you are insane, either driven by pure antisocial desires or some terrible sense of justice. If it is the former, it’s only a matter of time before you end up burning yourself. Virtually all of these people that I’ve seen have ended up in some kind of homosexual scandal. For Matt Heimbach, it was a sex scandal with his mother-in-law. Kudos to him for keeping it hetero. I guess.

The Fuentes debacle was extremely disheartening. I had known he was working with the feds for some years now, but to see the card played like that was obscene. It should have been heartening that no amount of force was enough to get anyone to take it seriously. I guess.

Whatever. I do feel like most of what I did was a waste. I put so much time and effort into Fuentes. People who know know, I’m not interested in explaining it to people who don’t know. Getting stabbed in the back because he’s a pussy who can’t do a bit of time and a queen who cares about money (for reasons other than “because women like money”) was whatever. It was more just a forced reckoning with how hopeless things actually are.

Looking at my life, it is incredible what I’ve been able to hold together. I think I’ve probably made it past the point where I would fall apart. But if I do, I see no better place to do it than on an internet TV show. At least I can confirm it won’t be anything gay or otherwise deeply sick. It would just be the exhausted collapse of a man ridiculous enough to have imagined that he could do something good.

Wait, no. That’s too heavy, self-congratulatory, masturbatory.

Let me try again.

It would just be the retarded end of a retard.

That fits better.

But yes. I am going to clean myself up. And I’m going to do a TV show. This will occur. Of the things I did that I think may have mattered, it is going to focus on the humor part, rather than the helping young men part. It’s going to be primarily an artistic project, rather than a political one. I really like a lot of stuff that is happening with AI, and I see a way to use it in an interesting way. I will try to make it pay for itself. If it doesn’t, then I’ll just say that it wasn’t meant to be.

Of course, I haven’t actually converted to communism. Communism is an ideology. Bertrand Russell actually very casually classified it as a religion. I am against all ideologies. Furthermore, I am a religious Christian, and communism, as an ideology (or a religion) is anti-Christian, even though it does tend to uphold all of the social norms of Christianity (the major exception being abortion; I’m sure there are other exceptions, though none major I can think of).

Ideology is an insane replacement of philosophy. I suppose that what I would say specifically is that my understanding of Christian philosophy has caused me to align more with economic policies supported by socialists, as I have come to realize that it is simply an absolute fact that money corrupts everything it touches. The top leaders in the Gulf States are drinking alcohol, engaged casually in homosexuality, and so on. The new leader in Syria, whatever he’s calling himself now, certainly changed his tune when the option for wealth appeared to him.

It seems like this pretty much always happens. Maybe it didn’t used to happen, before the Industrial Revolution, when the power that wealth gave you was always limited, but now that the power that wealth brings is unlimited, it seems that there is no one too pure to not get sucked into it, which simply means that those with the gold make the rules. And frankly, the Jews control the wealth, due to their control of the banks, and this means they can control everyone.

I hate to say it, but if I hadn’t been forced into exile, it’s probable I would have been myself corrupted. Why wouldn’t I have been? I mean I like to think I wouldn’t have been, because I like to think I am who I believe I am, but everyone believes all sorts of things about themselves, and most of the time these things are not true, so it would seem ridiculous for me to believe that I am the singular exception.

I suppose my exile allows me to believe that I am the exception. So I might as well just take the win. Regardless, even if I and some small percentage of people are willing to stand on moral principle, due to insanity or a fear of God (most likely a mix of both), and perhaps some desire for legacy, the majority are not, and so you can only trust people who are locked into an incentive structure.

Presidents Putin and Xi are good men. They behave as very good men, using their power as leaders to work for the benefit of their people. It is worthy of note however that the incentive structures they operate within are such as they benefit personally from behaving in a way that benefits their people. This is in stark contrast to the incentive system in democracies, where any individual working in the system maximizes personal benefit by acting against the interests of the population, and in the interests of donors.

It is probably true that authoritarian governments attract people who are more driven by principle, whereas democracy governments attract people with no morals at all, along with many actual sadistic sociopaths. I would be shocked to find out that Vladimir Putin and Xi Jinping do not behave in their personal lives, when no one is watching, much better than Joe Biden or Donald Trump. And people like Emmanuel Macron and Friedrich Merz are obviously deeply sick. Then you’ve got women running around trying to get everyone killed for sexual reasons. Everything. The question of the extent to which authoritarianism shapes men into better men and the extent to which it attracts better men is ultimately irrelevant, as it is obvious that better men run authoritarian governments. If I had to guess, I would say that at the highest levels, it is genuinely good (authoritarianism) or bad (democracy) people who seek power, while at middle and lower, people are mainly conforming to the culture.

Also, before anyone says “but there are bad authoritarian leaders and good democracy leaders” – yes, I know. I just mentioned that there are many sickos running Islamic countries. However, if you were to break down those incentive structures, you would obviously find more patterns. Most obviously, the US overthrows any Islamic dictator who doesn’t play ball, and it is impossible to be a good leader while serving the US.

It seems it is much harder to find a good man in a democracy than it is to find a bad man in an autocracy, however. Thomas Massie seems like a good man. It’s basically a canard that he supports immigration. He isn’t a purist, but I’ve seen shills defending Israel make this claim. When Fuentes was everywhere, he brought it up every time Massie was mentioned. The claim is that NumbersUSA gives him an “F.” It’s actually a “C-” now.

That bill allocated $3.4 trillion in money. Border security, broadly, was less than 5%. “You would have to be for open borders not to support the other 95% of this bill, whatever it may be” is not an adult position to take.

To be clear, he is not an absolutist anti-immigration activist like Trump pretended to be. But no one really is. He’s as good on immigration as anyone in Congress. It was only looking into this that I found out how worthless that NumbersUSA site is. What an absolute sham.

Regardless, he’s the closest thing you have to a good man in the US government, by a lot. But how far is he from the levers of powers? Trump/AIPAC might successfully primary him. They probably won’t, because Trump wants to attack him for remarrying too soon after his wife died instead of his immigration positions. Trump arguably can’t attack his immigration positions, given that Trump’s own immigration positions are much more extreme than Massie’s.

Marjorie seems to be a good person, despite being a woman. But she literally quit the government because everyone was evil. (NB4 “her personal life” – yeah, dude. She’s a woman.)

Liberal democracy is the transmutation of liberal economic policies into a political system, given that it is a system that is purely about money. We all go along with this stupid charade that we “vote in” politicians, but the actual reality is that the candidate for any relevant state or national office is decided during the primary, where whichever candidate with the most money gets the nomination. You then have two bought-and-paid-for candidates running against one another. (And in most districts, it doesn’t even matter as the way the maps are drawn, you already know which party is going to win.)

There is zero reason anyone would get involved in politics in a democracy other than to make money (and gain status, but I repeat myself). Maybe some moron thinks they are going to “change things.” I don’t know what kind of ego you would need to have to think that it’s as simple as “no one ever thought of that before.” You would just lose. Or maybe get offered the money and take it. Though a very rare occurrence, both AOC and MTG basically got elected on pure popular support, surprising the establishment. Then AOC sold out and MTG quit.

All the money is corruption money. The salaries of Congress people are basic middle class salaries. Yet these people are virtually all wealthy.

This is a big topic. It is clearly impossible to be in a democracy government and maintain morality, and it is impossible to become wealthy enough to change society through private sector behaviors and maintain morality. This whole idea of the alchemical equation of turning labor into tokens and then running them through machines that multiply them creates infinite corruption, and the only way to control it is through a state apparatus powerful enough to control it. That’s apparently how communism ends up with “the state as God.”

Matt Walsh can’t reject an invitation by Tucker Carlson. He also can’t take a legitimate position on the Jews and Israel, because he works for Little Benny the Big Man. It’s a funny situation for Tucker, because he can just call this guy up whenever he wants and straight-up rat hole him.

This week, Walsh got the rat-holing of a lifetime, with Tucker moving to smoke him out, let loose the hounds, tickle him to tears, and finally, stroke the goat while giggling maniacally.

This is the single most obvious scam in the history of media scams. But it continues to work incredibly well. Or at least it did before Tucker Carlson came through like a whirlwind and started rat-holing people.

With Candace Owens having bullied Shapiro into firing her, Walsh is the last individual anyone even knows about who is aiding Shapiro in his Jew scheme. He babbles on about trannies (still) and says a bunch of racist stuff. But instead of adding the “I love Israel” part, he has an ostensibly “more masculine” bit where he says “I just don’t care, it has nothing to do with America.” That is of course retarded on its face, given that the United States pays for all of it.

I have never in my life heard Matt Walsh say something that was not totally obvious. He’s not even a particularly good talker. (As I prepare for my show, I can always tell myself, “well, umming or no, I’m already better than Matt Walsh.”) But his curmudgeonly old lumberjack fake persona (seriously, find a picture of him without his beard and then tell me this is a “real man”) is apparently a selling point.

“This is on the other side of the world and it’s not my problem” sounds like a valid perspective. But it simply is not, because no one is talking about that, no one views it that way, and it is not that way. What we are talking about is the fact that the United States, with its biggest military ever and its infinity money, is backing this entire thing. Obviously, it wouldn’t be happening without the funding and military backing of the US. Israel is a small country, whereas Moslems are a quarter of the world’s population and could obviously easily wipe these people out in a few minutes. Egypt alone could wipe them out very fast. Frankly, Hamas and Hezbollah alone could probably do it within a few months of the US cutting the funding.

Therefore, there is no conversation about the war outside of the conversation of the US funding it, because if it were not for US funding, Israel would not exist at all, let alone be committing the most extreme genocide in history on a very public stage. Every issue involving Israel, therefore, is first and foremost an American issue, and therefore it is the responsibility of those involved in American politics to take a hard position on the issue.

What’s more, this is the most consequential issue for America and Americans, as it could literally totally destroy our country. This is without even going into the facts about everything else the Jews are doing in this country, but simply looking at Israel: because everyone in the world understands this is an American issue, the US is becoming a pariah state for its genocide. It is a universally hated country now. People used to love the US. Everyone now views it as totally satanic. This goes beyond simply being spat on as a tourist: this threatens the US economy. Objectively, US support for Israel is making Americans poorer, and that goes way beyond simply the tax dollars dumped into this project, and digs into America’s ability to operate on the world stage while causing total internal breakdown. It is infecting the social order, used as a justification for new forms of censorship we’ve never seen. Further, the US being sucked into a gigantic war on behalf of Israel is not at all outside the realm of possibility.

You cannot simply dance around this as an American political commentator. It is not simply a “cowardly” position, it is a position that makes you look retarded, as if you do not understand the most basic dynamics of US politics, which should make a person ask: “Why then are you a US political commentator?”

Obviously, the whole “support Israel, bigot!” thing is not really working very well anymore. These people are trying other strategies. If you listen to Nick Fuentes, he tells you “Israel is the same as Russia” (he claims without evidence that “Russia influences American policy” and therefore it’s the same as Israel). A lot of these people are talking about Moslems constantly now, because it is a lot easier to get people to hate Moslems than it is to get them to love the Jews. Frankly, Walsh’s “I don’t care, it’s not our problem” is not very popular, even though you would think on its face it would be. It’s because basically everyone, even the poorly informed, understand that when you talk about Israel, you are talking about an American issue.

Walsh is totally full of shit when he says that he “never cared about Israel.” He actually made a point to say “you can go back from before I worked at the Daily Wire and look at my old blog and see I never talked about Israel.” Although his old blog is deleted, we have some of the old posts archived, including this one:

Oh wait, jeez. I was about to say “he was already in his forties at the time.” I just looked it up and he is thirty-nine (39) as of this date. What the hell, man? How did that happen? I guess that makes sense in terms of his career trajectory. I had generally assumed that he had some other job, took up blogging as a side thing, and then opportunities appeared. So, he was 27 when he published that blog.

Again, the blog is deleted. But according to his Wikipedia page, he was fired from conservative radio in 2013, not long after that blog was published. Who knows how hard he was going against Israel? The next year, he started working for Glenn Beck’s “The Blaze,” and then in 2017 started working for Ben Shapiro’s “Daily Wire.” And his understanding of the basic facts around Israel were forever changed.

(Note: I assume he must have at some point addressed the issue of money to Israel during the hullaballoo, wherein he’s attempted to ride the fence harder than anyone else, literally working for Ben Shapiro while appearing in friendly interviews with Tucker Carlson. However, whatever the mental gymnastics are on that one, the math is not convincing enough to work in prime time on Tucker Carlson, hence the fact that he didn’t bother to present it. My bet is that if pressed, he says “well, I don’t think foreign aid is a good idea in principle,” in which case someone would respond, “so then why don’t you say ‘my only concern is that the US should stop funding Israel,’ instead of ‘I don’t care’?”)

In terms of Tucker rat-holing him in this episode published on Friday, it could be an exaggeration to claim that he was tickled to tears and that the goat was stroked. It’s a bit of a reference to the old Stormer meme from years ago, which I just looked up.

It was clear that Tucker wanted to keep the conversation as friendly as possible, and simply demonstrate his power to Ben Shapiro, i.e., “I’m in ur base, goat-stroking ur doodz.” As a more practical matter, it shows Walsh’s audience that Tucker’s views on Israel are acceptable. Shapiro claims they are not acceptable, that they are outside of allowed discourse, that there are not any circumstances under which US support for Israel can be questioned. So it was a power move, a way to prove that he has sway over all conservatives.

For the record, although I like Tucker, I do not truly trust him at all. In fact, I have a series that I have not published about what I see as his agenda. I don’t think it is likely that he is an intelligence agent, but he is playing a game that goes beyond what he is presenting. He’s deeply tied to JD Vance, who is in turn an agent of Silicon Valley. That whole scene is very dirty.

This probably speaks to the extent to which this whole thing is currently embedded in the cultural awareness: that these Silicon Valley people are into something very weird, that they are using “JD Vance” (fake name, btw) as a vehicle to seize power.

If you’re thinking “oh he must not be going to even publish those articles he hyped up, if he was he wouldn’t be talking about it now,” you may be right. I went through them earlier today and it was kind of a mess. The sort of thing where typically, instead of editing, I would just rewrite from scratch. There are a handful of interesting facts which I don’t think are getting enough attention. You have just right out in the open this “Vance” character saying that he’s going to be the next president, and it is not in any way a secret that he’s a creature of Silicon Valley, of the gay guy who is talking about the Antichrist and running an AI spy machine clearly intended to establish the total AI nightmare world I’ve spent years describing, where each individual is targeted by their electronics, manipulated as if they’ve all got their own little Jolly West in their pocket. This ability to manipulate perceptions on a grand scale is much scarier than the police state implications of Palantir (which are scary enough).

It’s highly confusing why more people are not talking about this, and my premise is that it has a lot to do with Tucker Carlson. It’s hard to say the extent to which he is aware of what is obviously going on with Vance. The idea that Tucker is swayed by Vance simply writing a good book (which is not political) and then talking in broad platitudes about “working class populism,” and that this sway is so strong that it causes Tucker to deny the obvious, is hard to believe.

The other question is whether Tucker will throw Vance under the bus before the 2028 election cycle. That would certainly make the most logical sense. It would be crazy for Tucker to do all of this work and then step out of the way for Vance, who has done literally nothing but stand there looking fat, speaking aught but the broadest and most hallow platitudes with the gentility of a eunuch.

Jeffrey Epstein’s relationship with Steve Bannon has shocked a lot of people. Not me, sir. I was already aware of how weird all these people were.

Even if Tucker is just spilling the beans about the Jews as part of a broader plan to implant us all with microchips so Peter Thiel can alter our DNA and turn us into human robots to build his infernal Lazarus machines, it’s still nice to have the whole Jew thing out in the open like this.

If I could say one thing to Matt Walsh: “You ain’t no lumberjack, bruv.”

This probably speaks to the extent to which this whole thing is currently embedded in the cultural awareness: that these Silicon Valley people are into something very weird, that they are using “JD Vance” (fake name, btw) as a vehicle to seize power.

If you’re thinking “oh he must not be going to even publish those articles he hyped up, if he was he wouldn’t be talking about it now,” you may be right. I went through them earlier today and it was kind of a mess. The sort of thing where typically, instead of editing, I would just rewrite from scratch. There are a handful of interesting facts which I don’t think are getting enough attention. You have just right out in the open this “Vance” character saying that he’s going to be the next president, and it is not in any way a secret that he’s a creature of Silicon Valley, of the gay guy who is talking about the Antichrist and running an AI spy machine clearly intended to establish the total AI nightmare world I’ve spent years describing, where each individual is targeted by their electronics, manipulated as if they’ve all got their own little Jolly West in their pocket. This ability to manipulate perceptions on a grand scale is much scarier than the police state implications of Palantir (which are scary enough).

It’s highly confusing why more people are not talking about this, and my premise is that it has a lot to do with Tucker Carlson. It’s hard to say the extent to which he is aware of what is obviously going on with Vance. The idea that Tucker is swayed by Vance simply writing a good book (which is not political) and then talking in broad platitudes about “working class populism,” and that this sway is so strong that it causes Tucker to deny the obvious, is hard to believe.

The other question is whether Tucker will throw Vance under the bus before the 2028 election cycle. That would certainly make the most logical sense. It would be crazy for Tucker to do all of this work and then step out of the way for Vance, who has done literally nothing but stand there looking fat, speaking aught but the broadest and most hallow platitudes with the gentility of a eunuch.

Jeffrey Epstein’s relationship with Steve Bannon has shocked a lot of people. Not me, sir. I was already aware of how weird all these people were.

Even if Tucker is just spilling the beans about the Jews as part of a broader plan to implant us all with microchips so Peter Thiel can alter our DNA and turn us into human robots to build his infernal Lazarus machines, it’s still nice to have the whole Jew thing out in the open like this.

If I could say one thing to Matt Walsh: “You ain’t no lumberjack, bruv.”