[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / random / 93 / biohzrd / hkacade / hkpnd / tct / utd / uy / yebalnia ]

/liberty/ - Liberty

Non-authoritarian Discussion of Politics, Society, News, and the Human Condition (Fun Allowed)

Name
Email
Subject
REC
STOP
Comment *
File
Password (Randomized for file and post deletion; you may also set your own.)
Archive
* = required field[▶Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.
Flag
Embed
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Options

Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webp,webm, mp4, mov, pdf
Max filesize is16 MB.
Max image dimensions are15000 x15000.
You may upload5 per post.


Ya'll need Mises.

File: 677a2ac67ce50dd⋯.png (85.71 KB,650x336,325:168,United_Kingdom_unemploymen….png)

 No.99799

Under Thatcher the free market Prime Minister the unemployment rates skyrocketed. Gee I wonder why? is it because she was opposed to government spending??!

____________________________
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.99801

>>99799

>stop subsidizing busywork

>busywork disappears

This week in things that should be obvious

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.99802

>>99801

so public spending makes jobs. also as soon as Thatcher left the unemployment rate went down

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.99806

>>99802

>when you don’t know the difference between jobs and value creation

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.99807

>>99806

*ahem*

look at the chart you fucking retard. Thatcher's free market and monetarist policies caused the worst unemployment levels since the great depression in the UK

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.99809

>>99807

>when you double down on your ignorance

Seriously. Just the 1945-1960 period directly contradicts your hot take all by itself.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.99810

>>99809

the 45-60 period was very interventionist and had lots of spending and about 97-99% of people were employed compared to 87-90% under Thatcher

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.99811

>>99810

Wrong.

Look at the dotted blue line. It tracks gov’t spending.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.99812

>>99811

and Thatcher cut spending by LOTS which caused the unemployment

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.99814

>>99812

>tripling down on not knowing the difference between jobs and value creation

Come on, man. At least try to engage in good faith here.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.99815

>>99814

what is value creation and how isn't this a failure of the free market. explain

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.99816

>>99811

>>99812

The dotted blue line tracks inflation you illiterates.

>>99815

You should read up on the winter of discontent to see what kind of shit was going down in the interventionist paradise that was the UK.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.99817

>>99816

>literally know nothing about how inflation works

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.99818

>>99815

>the free market isn’t infinitely resilient to every stupid thing the government does, therefore it’s market failure

Sure thing, buddy.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.99819

>>99816

nice interventionist whataboutism.

>>99818

Thatcher used monetarist policies and she privatized business, deregulated, gave union less power and the unemployment rate rose

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.99820

>>99819

>literally can’t tell the difference between jobs and value creation

Just because it’s hard for you to jerk your limp dick to orgasm doesn’t mean you’re providing value to others by doing it.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.99821

>>99820

>The performance of actions that increase the worth of goods, services or even a business

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.99822

>>99820

>The performance of actions that increase the worth of goods, services or even a business

how does this relate to job creation in anyway?

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.99823

>>99817

Enlighten me.

>>99819

>Whataboutism

The interventionist policies of the 70s had a disastrous effect on the economy, which grew increasingly inefficient as state-owned industry fell behind the competition in Continental Europe. Ending the subsidies caused unemployment to increase temporarily as the market shed the dead weight industry had accumulated.

That's not whataboutism. It's context.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.99824

>>99820

>The performance of actions that increase the worth of goods, services or even a business

how does this relate to job creation in anyway?

>>99823

>Ending the subsidies caused unemployment to increase temporarily as the market shed the dead weight industry had accumulated.

then why as soon as Thatcher left the employment rate shot back up again?

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.99825

>>99823

Since you’re discussing economics without that information, you’ve already gone out of your way to avoid understanding the topic. Why should I make the effort educating you?

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.99826

>>99824

>then why as soon as Thatcher left the employment rate shot back up again?

When did that happen?

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.99827

>increased the VAT and tried to implement a poll tax

>free market

choose one

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.99828

>>99824

Once upon a time an economist went to China. His hosts took him on a tour and showed him a group of men digging a ditch with shovels. The economist asked why they didn’t use earth moving equipment. The Chinese hosts responded that it would put people out of work. “Oh,” said the economist. “I didn’t know it was a jobs program. Take away their shovels.”

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.99829

>>99823

I think our friend is referring to monetary policy-targeted inflation.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.99830

File: c79135e90b4a791⋯.jpg (89.06 KB,417x639,139:213,Screenshot_20190321-173753.jpg)

>>99826

she left around pic related

>>99827

>deregulates, cuts welfare, gives unions less power, cuts subsidies

>n-not real capitalism

pathetic

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.99832

>>99829

>thinking there’s any other type

Seriously. Even rising energy prices are more than outpaced by falling costs without inflationary monetary policy.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.99833

>>99830

>doesn’t know how an economic horse race works

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.99834

>>99833

enlighten me instead of using meme arrows

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.99835

>>99830

>welfare, subsidies, and union leverage still exists

>increased VAT = deregulation

pathetic

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.99836

>>99835

>inch ever closer to "true capitalism" with deregulation

>2 million people lose their jobs

explain how it's not the fault of your free market fairyland

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.99837

>>99836

The implementation of taxes is not deregulation and not a free market. How difficult is this for you to understand?

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.99838

File: 264ea1865f6a41d⋯.png (98.83 KB,609x714,29:34,1553120602463.png)

>>99837

>n-not real capitalism

Thatcher did plenty of tax cuts

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.99839

>>99838

>n-not real capitalism

strawman. I did not state the UK was not capitalist. I simply stated it was no where approximate to a free market.

>Thatcher did plenty of tax cuts

And plenty of tax increases.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.99840

File: ebec1e88e4856e8⋯.jpg (206.57 KB,978x648,163:108,Screenshot_20190321-175820.jpg)

>>99839

OH NONONONONONNO

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.99842

>>99840

lol fag

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.99843

File: 1180d66250e2e12⋯.jpg (5.16 KB,208x240,13:15,c3611aa5.jpg)

>>99840

>Doesn't have a WSJ subscription

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.99846

File: 480e0bd31f838a8⋯.jpg (69.57 KB,599x632,599:632,keynesian_policy1.jpg)

Wasn't the Mad Aussie supposed to scare idiot normies away from this place, not attract more of them?

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.99847

File: ed97778d37a70df⋯.webm (3.88 MB,426x240,71:40,fear_and_misery.webm)

>>99846

No such thing as bad publicity, I guess.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.99849

>>99812

because the government was bankrupt you idiot

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.99850

>>99849

then why weren't private sector jobs create

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.99853

>>99850

because those jobs were useless in the first place

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.99886

She was a fucking moron, who trashed strategic industries, created misery for the fun of it, hated govt spending but ran huge deficits anyway - despite running into a ton of oil and selling everything that wasn't nailed down, and kicking off a process of financialization that has landed the UK with some of the biggest debts, most overvalued property, and most over-leveraged banks in the world. Just an all round disaster. Never, ever, let a woman run a country.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.99887

File: 62780b1b0a105eb⋯.png (108.25 KB,500x372,125:93,government-spending-real-1….png)

There was an overall net increase in public and welfare expenditure during Thatcher's term. How can one consider this "deregulatory" or "pro free market"?

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.



[Return][Go to top][Catalog][Nerve Center][Random][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[]
[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / random / 93 / biohzrd / hkacade / hkpnd / tct / utd / uy / yebalnia ]