[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / random / 93 / biohzrd / hkacade / hkpnd / tct / utd / uy / yebalnia ]

/liberty/ - Liberty

Non-authoritarian Discussion of Politics, Society, News, and the Human Condition (Fun Allowed)
Name
Email
Subject
REC
STOP
Comment *
File
Password (Randomized for file and post deletion; you may also set your own.)
Archive
* = required field[▶Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.
Flag
Embed
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Options

Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webp,webm, mp4, mov, pdf
Max filesize is16 MB.
Max image dimensions are15000 x15000.
You may upload5 per post.


Ya'll need Mises.

File: 586efcaf51edf99⋯.jpeg (84.58 KB,500x756,125:189,regulatoryCapture.jpeg)

 No.104261

Why is regulatory capture such a hard pill to swallow? Is it just too abstract? Do people who keep suggesting more and more regulations to solve certain problems understand the lobbying process, the incentives involved, and even if those can be overcome, how bureaucracies really function?

____________________________
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.104269

People like to believe that there's a lever they can pull to make things better, to "fix" the problem. Most of them, even moderately pro-market types, don't truly understand how the market functions, so trusting "the market" to fix it, an abstract entity which they don't quite understand, gives them anxiety. Regardless of logical arguments (which are usually irrelevant when it comes to Normans), the idea of a benevolent agency making sure that only the good things happen and the bad things don't happen provides a certain kind of security. This becomes doubly true when one considers that nearly all Normans went to public school, where it was drilled into their heads that bureaucrats are selfless civil servants with your best interests in mind.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.104375

If we're talking about regulatory capture would having competing regulating agencies in a market be better? It seems like a lot of these types of problems stem from a lack of competition.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.104376

>>104375

In certain cases, competing regulatory agencies would be desirable, if consumers derived some value from it. An agency which certifies a firm to put certain labels on its product (e.g., "certified organic") would be mutually beneficial to the seller and buyer, so we can expect certification forms to compete with on the market. Current experience, however, suggests that quality-controlling regulatory agencies would not be competitive, and fall out of the market. Nearly all food providers in the market right now, even fast food joints, have a set of of internal regulations that they follow which are stricter than the FDA's. This implies that firms can compete on quality directly, ergo they would be no market for quality-based regulation.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.105326

Learning about regulatory capture did push me more into libertarianism tbh.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.



[Return][Go to top][Catalog][Nerve Center][Random][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[]
[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / random / 93 / biohzrd / hkacade / hkpnd / tct / utd / uy / yebalnia ]