[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / random / 93 / biohzrd / hkacade / hkpnd / tct / utd / uy / yebalnia ]

/k/ - Weapons

Salt raifus and raifu accessories
Email
Comment *
File
Password (Randomized for file and post deletion; you may also set your own.)
Archive
* = required field[▶Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.
Embed
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Options
dicesidesmodifier

Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webp,webm, mp4, mov, pdf
Max filesize is16 MB.
Max image dimensions are15000 x15000.
You may upload5 per post.


There's no discharge in the war!

File: 8d1b034278920a3⋯.jpg (58.21 KB,800x535,160:107,heh.jpg)

76a876 No.680976 [View All]

Stolen from: >>>/n/787388

https://archive.fo/GgOcc

>Nothing the US does will make Turkey abandon its deal with Moscow to purchase S-400 air defense systems, Turkish Foreign Minister Mevlut Cavusoglu said, as Washington keeps threatening Ankara with sanctions.

>The purchase of the Russian-made weapons has long been a point of contention in relations between the two NATO allies. The US has repeatedly threatened Ankara with various punitive measures should they not abandon the deal. It has already canceled training for Turkish pilots learning to fly American F-35 fighter jets as well as threatened to kick Turkey out of the multi-billion-dollar fighter jet program altogether.

>Turkey, however, has stood defiant of US pressure and vowed to retaliate against any US sanctions.

>“No matter what sanctions decision, no matter which statement comes from the US, we have already bought the S-400,” Cavusoglu told journalists on Monday. The only question related to the deal still being discussed is when the air defense systems will be delivered to Turkey, he said.

>The minister also said that Turkey cannot rely on NATO in its national defense and accused Ankara’s Western allies of leaving it all alone in its hour of need.

>Turkey urgently needs air defense. We cannot say ‘NATO should protect us’ if there is an attack because, let’s be honest, NATO can only protect 30% of Turkish airspace. It was the US, Germany and the Netherlands that pulled out Patriots when we needed them the most.

138 posts and 39 image replies omitted. Click [Open thread] to view. ____________________________
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

818a39 No.682476

>>682468

My understanding is that the US doesn't have advanced land-based AA missiles because it doesn't share a land border with any credible enemies.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

6a1fa2 No.682477

>>682468

When it gets really insane is that a number of countries that are in NATO that do field S-300 (that they got Russia to modernized recently) and can/will upgrade to S-400 if they want (Slovakia, Bulgaria and Greece… Greece even has Tor too).

The actual problem is "Turkey isn't doing what Washington tell them", which should tell you what NATO really is meant to be (loyal auxiliaries of the Judeo-American Empire)

>Why wouldn't it be the other way around, given Turkey is NATO member?

The fact that Russia (that is notoriously paranoid) has no export restrictions should be a sign that at least they feel it won't happen or that there won't be any easy solution. Maybe they're wrong, but at the very least it shows confidence in their gear.

What does that tells you about the F-35?

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

9e8088 No.682486

File: 06a60075502f8c5⋯.jpg (166.16 KB,1200x800,3:2,1200px-A6M3_Zero_N712Z_1.jpg)

>>682449

>Good tactics always trump good gear

True unless your gear restricts you from devising useful counters to non-retarded enemy tactics.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

0e1c01 No.682489

File: 66d7eab3e8a10a9⋯.png (543.13 KB,1000x938,500:469,ClipboardImage.png)

>>681064

The Eternal Leaf strikes again

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

0bbc06 No.682541

>>682448

Except this is not his bodyguard, it's your daughter.

Congrats, you just shoot your daughter. Thankfully you didn't miss.

There's nothing be proud about fucking friendly fire.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

0bbc06 No.682543

>>682477

>What does that tells you about the F-35?

F-35 is already used worldwide with actual running time.

You can shit on them and they will always be there.

But your S-300 and S-400 magic missiles conveniently do not work when they are needed,

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

533ccc No.682578

>>682477

>What does that tells you about the F-35?

has stealth anything ever been put to real world test, or even tested on a secure Area 51 type range by well equipped security-cleared skeptics?

I keep hearing about how its radar sig is very small but if its still there its still there.

Like Jay Leno said back in Reagan admin "It makes a huge bomber look like a little bird on radar, yeah, a little bird flying over the North Pole at 400mph at 4am."

Unless you also got decoys that can maintain a flight path that the jet could take (while jet banks away) I don't see the point of stealth. (I'm pretty sure any AA missile could easily be programed to ignore decoy flares that quickly drop from 600mph to near 0 and free fall).

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

9e8088 No.682609

File: 341a2814a69ba0c⋯.png (5.57 MB,4288x2848,134:89,Man reacts to news of Indi….png)

>>682543

>You can shit on them and they will always be there.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

891f78 No.682616

>>682578

>has stealth anything ever been put to real world test

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zolt%C3%A1n_Dani

Cue shitposting.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

6a1fa2 No.682623

File: c35e32f35b2ee98⋯.jpg (652.12 KB,1772x1271,1772:1271,F-35 in need of re-coating.jpg)

File: 85fb62ed5c22d16⋯.jpg (465.4 KB,3500x1752,875:438,F-35 with RAM coating.jpg)

>>682578

>has stealth anything ever been put to real world test

In Serbia in 1999. And it took them a while but the serbs air defense did figure out a way.

>I keep hearing about how its radar sig

You can optimize a plane to considerably reduce it's radar signature on certain band and a certain angle but you can't do it for all bands or all angles.

It's like trying to make the plane actually "not there"… which obviously isn't physically possible.

Also the idea of reducing signatures is just that "reducing". The simplest solution is making bigger radars (more miniaturized arrays) feed by more powerful generators.

And radars today are so powerful there are multiple systems out there that detect RAM coating as while it doesn't leave a signature, on a very powerful system… it leaves a shadow (which is just as unnatural).

Smart stealthy design is you apply it where you can (as any reduction of signature is always good), meaning mostly when designing the airframe and you stop when it's costing you flying performance or ungodly amount of maintenance. Because it isn't worth the hassle.

That's what we do for ships.

Do you know what maintenance look like on a F-22/F-35? And why their operational flight hours are so low?

Their external surface is covered in a light coating of expensive RAM (everyone know this right?). Which is a carbon black/iron nanosphere/graphene or something akin compound. Basically it's a metal-ish glue.

So when you need to access a panel you need to get a sander and locate the panel you need to open and find where the super strong metallic super expensive masking tape around the edge of the panel is and the under which the screws are located… expose the tape and peel off exposing the panel screws and lines. Only then can you unscrew/remove the panels and make the checks or changes or repairs/replacements.

Then you put the panel back on, you tape over the joints (with a high heat blower and the special expensive masking tape that need to not peel of in the face of supersonic wind and high speed maneuvers) and then you spray your RAM coating (super expensive metal glue) over it all.

Then have to wait for the RAM to cure and harden (duh!).

Which clearly due to it's metallic properties can only take somewhere between 24 and 36 hours (in a climate controlled hangar obviously).

And that RAM coating is most of the RCS reduction.

Does that sound like something you want to do on war plane?

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

65e211 No.682626

>>682578

For a fighter, stealth means the enemy sees you from 50km instead of 100km. It's expensive and fucks with the plane's speed and maneuverability, but we still do it because it's the only way US fighters have a prayer in hell of surviving contact with their Russian ccounterparts.

Bombers are a totally different matter, they can be extremely stealthy with very little performance impact so it's just a matter of costs (and strategic bombers are valuable enough that it's almost always worth the money, unless you plan to use them exclusively to bomb undefended sandniggers).

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

40c262 No.682681

>>682626

It's expensive, fucks with the plane and specifically is entirely ineffective against the Russian radar system, which has been (unlike ours) designed with doctrine and purpose in mind, and is easily capable of low-band target acquisition.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

9e8088 No.682792

>>682626

>>682682

Sometimes I wonder why the US seems so hellbent on destroying its own military in the name of Judeo-capitalism, especially with their greatest ally still relying on them for protection and foreign policies.

It's not like they couldn't have blown a trillion shekels via the F-23 and ASF-14 programs in exchange for getting planes that a sane person would consider flightworthy at the very least, but instead they invested an entire spaceprogram's worth of shekels on a fat piggu suicide booth.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

818a39 No.682797

>>682792

The plan is to move the whole operation to China once America has been sucked dry.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

3569c8 No.682841

>>682792

>Entire space program

It only costs about 100 million to send a rocket into space, anon. That's based on NASA numbers, private companies do it even cheaper.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

9e8088 No.682872

>>682841

But for the price of 1 F-35 program NASA could've build at least two O'Neill cylinders and filled them with gay niggers because globohomo.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

23d6dc No.682880

>>682797

>2050

>Jews come to china

>Start doing (((the usual)))

>Can't own media

>Can't climb in government

>Chinese dislike the merchant tricks and just exterminate them by flattening jews into the pavement with tanks

Can't wait.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

99e9a1 No.682890

>>682880

You do know who put Mao into power right?

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

9e8088 No.682892

File: 1d0881b1ad9db2b⋯.webm (9.57 MB,854x480,427:240,China_The_Making_Of_'Gutt….webm)

File: 76d0c837fa0fa53⋯.mp4 (3.52 MB,640x360,16:9,China_elevator_was_hungry_….mp4)

File: 0d75ec32feb7390⋯.mp4 (1.84 MB,854x480,427:240,china_Truck_Runs_Over_Dad_….mp4)

>>682880

>CY+30

>Jews begin the great migration to the next greatest host ally after the controlled demolition of the US

>they arrive in China

>smog up the ass

>piss poor healthcare

>distrustful and often hostile population whose members don't want to cede their social status to long-nosed foreigners, no empathy for (((fellow whites)))

>biohazards everywhere

<Jews grow sterile and/or die in accidents one after the other

<they have the money to pay for healthcare but Chink doctors see this and start ripping them off until they die penniless, demand six million shekels per removed foreskin

<non-Israeli Jew population decreases by 80% over the next 25 years

<The Jewish minority remnant in China migrates to India, the few that are too poor or sick get put in mixed race apartments by the Chinese government where they get raped by aids ridden niggers with intact foreskins

<the newly arrived Indian kike minority dies off rapidly from food poisoning and dysentery

<the last kike alive wishes desperately that his predecessors hadn't genocided all the whites as an Iranian nuke hits Tel Aviv and he pukes his guts out before falling into the Ganges and drowning in liquid shit

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

65e211 No.682911

>>682792

I sort of suspect that there's some sort of ridiculous day-one planned obsolescence scheme going on here, I wouldn't be surprised at all if we end up replacing them within a decade. Convair pulled a trick like that back in the 50s, they were marketing the F-106 as a replacement for our obsolete F-102s before the F-102 actually entered service.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

71c73d No.682963

>>682626

>stealth means the enemy sees you from 50km instead of 100km

Maybe I'm just a retard, but wouldn't it be far cheaper and more effective to focus on active jamming rather than passive reduction of RCS if that's the goal?

Granted, arguing that [insert ridiculous thing] is cheaper than the F35 has become a bit of a meme, but wouldn't a slightly larger airframe (maybe not Vulcan tier, but an F-111 perhaps) hold enough electronics to render your opponents radar largely worthless as well as the missiles it needs to do its job as a fighter?

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

6a1fa2 No.682976

>>682911

That's definitely possible.

But it's gonna be a shitstorm because, unlike then, a fair chunk of the F-35 R&D bill was paid by US allies.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

cac193 No.683018

>>682997

>vacuum inversion wave

What is it?

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

818a39 No.683019

>>683018

Zero-point energy happens and the universe essentially pops like a bubble. It's fairly unlikely but if it does happen there isn't much anyone can do about it.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

991230 No.683025

>>682997

>Building a 200km long maglev track 80km from the ground is cheap and easy.

Yeah how about, no.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

9e8088 No.683027

>>683025

Hey, at least NASA might start taking SSTO research seriously.

Any further cylinders would be constructed in situ by guys from the already existing cylinder anyway so it should balance itself out even if building the first cylinder takes 6 million Space Shuttle launches.

>>682997

>a few billion

A completely unrealistic goal what with all the subcontractors, scientific institutions and unforeseen circumstances involved because no one's tried building a proper isolated biosphere in outer space before.

Maybe the baseline cost for building the initial skeleton structure of an O'Neill cylinder could be made cheap enough at some point, but to get it running you'll have to move people and equipment there considerably adding to the price even if the initial population is small.

It's also unknown how long it'll take for each cylinder to be self-sufficient in terms of food and for the economy to grow enough for the colonists to no longer be reliant on external taxpayer money infusions.

What would life on a /k/-administered O'Neill colony be like?

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

904af5 No.683077

>>682217

You do know only white makes pay a net positive in taxes here so that changes to costs averages to an already targeted demographic.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

904af5 No.683078

>>682880

Who the fuck do you think the economic advisors were in the past? They act the same.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

4bdb74 No.683621

>>681637

Instead of an animegirl, why couldn't it have shown itself as the man it once was?; donning his flightsuit.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

a4e5a2 No.683645

>>682379

Israeli F-16s stopped invading Syrian airspace when an S-200 shot one down in 2018. Now both their F-15s and 16s just skirt around over Lebanon and Jordan and exclusively use standoff munitions and glide bombs, or they send in F-35s or spoof US transponder codes if they NEED to fly over Syrian clay (which they don't, really, since nothing Syrian or Lebanese actually posits a strategic threat).

The Syrians COULD shoot at Israelis over Lebanon and Jordan with the S-300s, but they don't because it'll just be the same story as the Pantsirs - Israeli SEAD will overwhelm them via saturation and ECM, and a million vatniks will then kill themselves. Syria will be ready to use their S-300s against NATO and Israel's planes when they not only have enough of them, and enough Buks and Pantsirs and retrofits (new radars, UAVS, etc.) for all their other shitty missiles to complement the 300s in a layered, integration fashion, along. This probably won't happen until the current war is over, they just can't afford to.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

e5eba0 No.683658

>>682963

Active anythings are basically extremely bright beacons that are very easy to home onto from as far not obscured by the horizon. Stealth among other things is 100% radiosilence and passive everything.

>>682626

It would be a shame if they had missiles that can travel 50 kilometers ahead without a target and engage once they actually find anything.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

24e388 No.683660

>>682841

Sending shit into low earth orbit is about $5 000 per pound. Assuming average amerifat is 200 pounds, that's a million bucks per person. For a trillion bucks you can only send skywards one million people, excluding the habitat.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

24e388 No.683662

>>683018

A conjectured phenomenon where vacuum would transition to a lower energy state, where such transition would trigger the same transition of the adjacent space. Not known to have ever happened in the entire history of the universe, nor known if it's even physically possible. Either way it's nothing to be worried about, either it will never happen, or it obliterate everything without warning.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

9e8088 No.683669

File: 533e5af8ab9293b⋯.png (759.8 KB,1280x720,16:9,Hamlet, Act V, Scene I.png)

>>683660

If it takes half a million burgercoins to send an oldtype burger to an O'Neill cylinder or at least a LEO cargo terminal, how many newtype migrants would one be able to import from said O'Neill cylinder for the same price?

>>683621

<your digitzed soul will never find fullfillment in cyberspace by making SHTF real via highjackings of fighter planes and rightful clay together with your /k/omrades

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

cf3683 No.683840

The first shipment of S400s has arrived in Turkey.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

bdcecd No.683857

>>683840

How much warning will they need to take down the entire Greek airforce now?

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

001912 No.683888

>>683886

Surely even the roaches will succeed in shooting down at least one hostile aircraft, if only by chance. I mean, they may be shit, but shit isn't unlucky.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

2580bf No.684701

>>682578

Daily reminder Serbs shot down a F-117 which is stealthier than F-35, with a missile from the 1960s mounted on a truck in the 90s.

The F-35 can therefore be knocked down with a 1960s missile mounted on a truck in the 20s.

Moreover, F-35 from the front has a lower stealth than F-117, and from the back the F-35 has a stealth value equivalent to F-18ASH.

So it's basically like a 4.5++ not a 5th gen.

Modern radars? They've had 60 years of improvement, and over 20 years of knowing that stealth exists and focusing on countering it. First response is stronger radars, which managed to detect stealth aircraft without a problem but only for large countries. Second response was different frequencies, let even smaller countries detect stealth aircraft easily. Third response was high bandwidth integration of radars, so high power multifrequency radars could share their data and detect and target stealth aircraft more easily. Fourth step in detection was adding EWAR ships to blind and even to detect emissions from stealth aircraft, after all any aircraft that can't sense its environment or communicate is essentially useless. Sixth step is quantum infrared detectors that render all stealth useless as long as the laws of thermodynamics hold. Seventh step is passive radar, which maps the aircraft against microwave background radiation, which will render stealth useless so long as the remnants of the big bang are around.

So you see… we went like a dozen steps forward in stealth detection, and F-35 is a step back in stealth.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

17d660 No.684984

>>683857

The Hellenic Air Force is immune to slavaboo SAMemes.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

714c84 No.684987

>>684701

And the magic S-300 cannot shoot down an F-16, if it's piloted by a jew.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

e192ed No.684990

>>684984

with ND I don't think we even stand a chance anymore. Things were already about to collapse with syriza, now with ND which is syriza 2.0 the collapse will continue until our military becomes utterly worthless.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

714c84 No.684993

>>684990

It always gets worse until it gets better.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

2580bf No.685019

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

>>684987

This will launch on Tel Aviv long before S-400 is used on an Israeli F-16, but I don't expect a smol heda vietnamese monkey to understand political concerns.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

2185c3 No.685034

File: f5687db112c8c0c⋯.png (1016.7 KB,1200x840,10:7,ClipboardImage.png)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

71c73d No.685050

>>684984

If you have no aircraft then it is impossible for your opponent to destroy your aircraft.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

2580bf No.685151

>>684984

The hellenic air force uses a battalion (~100 missiles) of S-300 on Crete and is the reason why Turkey didn't just take all those islands, the complex protects about 1/2 of them closest to Turkey.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

17d660 No.685165

>>685151

The issue is that a well trained, experienced and intelligent pilot with a 4th gen fighter can always fool a SAM, as demonstrated by Greek F-16 pilots in excersizes against joint Israeli-American air-defenses. Sandnigger pilots are none of those things and their turdroach subspecies only had experience before King Roach put them all in jail for the coup. Also White-ish people with two-digit IQ can properly and creatively use groundborne air-defenses as demonstrated by Serbia. The best of sandniggers in Baghdad could not even aim their AA guns where the radar was putting the crosspiece and instead tried to shoot enemy aircraft by centering them in their sights.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

17d660 No.685166

>>685050

>no aircraft

We actually have more than even the UK until the F-35 enters service.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

2580bf No.685255

>>683027

nuclear pulse propulsion

a single npp earth to orbit tug could blast 100,000 tonnes of material into HIGH otbitals beyond geosynchronous. thats enough for the framework and factories needed to build hundreds of oneil cylinders, if even a single nickel iron asteroid could be finagled into space.

a few of those launches and you could put all of america into space easily.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

9e257e No.685280

File: b615c2ea91cac01⋯.png (18.25 KB,563x338,563:338,such is life F-35.png)

>>681214

>>681215

>>681216

>>681217

I like that the meta for winning a war against the US now is just to hold out long enough for all our fighter planes to self destruct.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.



[Return][Go to top][Catalog][Nerve Center][Random][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[]
[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / random / 93 / biohzrd / hkacade / hkpnd / tct / utd / uy / yebalnia ]