/gamergatehq/ - The GamerGate Headquarters

>>329488

>>329490

mg, why are you ip hopping? i thought this was something only acid man did

>>329490

>No, fuckface, I know that's what John Kelly dug up. This isn't some hypothetical John Kelly, he, himself, pieced together that Koro is Wulfington.

Prove it, then.

>So even if John Kelly isn't OP of the thread, it's what he dug up and pieced together posted in the thread.

So first you specifically call out John for posting it, now you're guessing he only dug it up?. Can't keep your story straight, can you?

Is that swami AKA 29 years

Jesus Christ dood your still stalking some faggot with shit taste in waifus,damn you homo?not that theres anything wrong with that but still,just send him your hotel room number so he can pound the stalker out of your rectum.

>>329514

>Dozens of people independently come to the conclusion that bnf/ddm is cancer

>D-don't believe acidcuck's lies, goy!

>>329513

I was thinking about this a bit today when I had some free time.

On three separate, independent occasions we've had various confirmations of DDMs structure and activities.

>One was early on by Nierdan, who got written off as a sperg for it and nobody paid any attention.

>Then we had a second, independent outing much later by Zan himself, who made that post on our board displayed up above, namefagging and with one of the IP hashes known to belong to him.

>And then I dug on them a year ago, deliberately avoiding Nierdan's leads and starting fresh as not to taint whatever information was uncovered. And found the same thing.

And privately, leakers from the overall group confirmed my findings for me over a Discord chat several months ago. Ralph confirmed that he had been contacted and invited into the group when he interviewed me. And I'll divulge that Archon of the Escapist had also been invited to their "VIP" chatroom on IRC to talk to them. I was invited into the group twice after GGHQ became the main board - once early on by Thidran and once late by s8tan, but I declined both times.

Exactly how many witnesses does it require before this thing can be laid down as a matter of fact? How much gymnastics can they really do to convince people that left is right, the sky is green, and it all hinges on what the definition of "is" is?

>>329532

If you don't want retaliation in kind, don't start fights with unwilling opponents?

No, the crybully is just mad that he got hit back. Now he wants there to be rules.

>>329531

>>329535

>why the edit?

>Edit, nah I'm not gonna take that bait any further.

Regardless, he's right. If you try swatting someone, you shouldn't cry when they "dox" you and report you to the FBI.

>>329539

You don't get to cite other people's lies to support your own bullshit.

and a little bonus.

>>329542

The plan was laid out in a thread by some of them in /meta/ back when this all started. The basics were to create an alt board, push it everywhere from /b/ to KiA to pull users to it and turn public opinion against us, then dox and humiliate me to get me to retire GGHQ so they could pull the rest of the anons to their board. The first two parts worked for them pretty well. But I held out through the third long enough for their own public autism to kill their alt board and eventually reveal the group collusion behind it to their own users. The damage to our board remained unchanged, but I stalled for enough time to take revolt down with us. "Ai uchi" - mutual killing.

While some steps were taken to try and salvage GGHQ in the meantime, I secretly doubted we'd be successful. We're talking about a group of invested people who can make 50+ UIDs and 100+ PPH on a board all by themselves. Turning them loose in a /pol/ or /b/ thread would have little trouble manufacturing a consensus. And they harnessed two powerful forces in their favor: The general anti-GG shilling by outsiders that had weakened 8chan's community cohesion as a whole since the Exodus, and the natural inclination of the anon community against moderated boards and namefags. It was all too easy to get people to believe the narrative, because censorship and mods on power trips are something the community has always been paranoid about, and also because nuance and details don't count for much in a battle of rhetoric and memes. Once some people started to believe their story, those people would pass it on to others who asked and it just perpetuated itself from there. I don't blame anybody who took the bait, but I damn well blame the people who laid it.

If I had known exactly what was going on in the days before the purge and revolt I'd have done some things differently. I was operating off a vague idea of "IRCfag" shills and certain trolls and knew a little bit about their activities and opinions re:GGHQ, but nothing like what was uncovered later. The biggest mistake I ever made was ignoring their faction and its internal drama all that time, on the premise that they would leave our board alone if I did.

>>329540

>time for the swat

They meant like with a newspaper, obviously.

>>329543

It's true, people that never post on /cow/ always try to PA them.

>>329546

They've got this hangup where they obsess over every detail of what I say, hoping to point out anything inconsistent so they could try and cast doubt on the whole story of what happened. I claim they tried to SWAT me and that it failed, which they did and it did. They counterclaim that there was no SWAT event (true) but then lie and say that I said there was a SWATing and claim the fact it didn't happen makes me a liar. When this gets blown out, the goalposts move to "there was no ''attempt!" but that's a lie right from their own threads.

It's a matter of fact that I did inject small amounts of disinformation about certain details into the public sphere while the investigation was going on. This was the result of a rough compromise: I had to be answerable to the community for all the drama so I couldn't just say nothing, but I also didn't want the fags on the receiving end to know exactly what I was really up to. And I honestly did hope one or more of them would get v& by the end of it. So things like exactly when I talked to the FBI didn't want them to know how long they'd been watching, exactly whose information I gave them didn't want them to know who needed to/could still hide, exactly what logs I'm in possession of didn't want them to know what to delete, and exactly how much of the Dox Crew stream I really have protip: The entire thing, I would either be ambiguous or misleading about these details when asked. I can talk about all that stuff now because we're a year out and nothing substantial happened other than them getting put on the RADAR. It wasn't a total bust, but the secrecy is no longer required.

A great example is the one Nackt pointed out up above. Hotwheels was part of their IRC in the #Luminati room and was friends with Drybones. He also gave me a 12 hour ultimatum, on black Friday when I work in retail to answer to him or he was taking our board - a very nasty move that favored the clique heavily. I had every reason to believe that he might divulge anything I would tell him in private to the DDM faggots, so I lied about the timetable and alluded that I hadn't given the FBI anything solid yet. This was on the chance that if he did tell them, they would panic and start deleting everything thinking they could still hide while being unaware the FBI was already watching them.

It all actually wound up working out better in my favor, because the faggots used these little inconsistencies to convince themselves that nothing had happened or that I was rusing. Because of that, they didn't button up as tightly as they might have, and I got to keep collecting more information on them and their activities for another year.

Pic related

for whoever is still replying to this thread including me

>>329564

>tfw BO

>tfw always and without exception a faggot

Might as well reply some more.

>>329584

That autism overload gets a dishonest vibe as soon as you realize, that /baph/ is a falseflagger paradise. Pic related is an example from yesterday.

Second, the swatting never happened. Remember: The feds sorted out the report because it was clearly bogus. Do you think they are like "Yeah, lets send in a fucking S.W.A.T. team tomorrow!" if they get a report concerning their own arms dealer?

>Oh good lord. People rightfully requested you be removed as board BO because you were handing out poster info to the FBI which has STILL yet to be justified.

After the bogus swatting attempt. Nackt should get away from Thirdran's popo club already.

>>329585

Truth be told, the only posts I handed over were the ones I could positively confirm belonged to the clique. Zan, Spergberg, and three or four others. I left it ambiguous to ramp up their overall panic. Same thing with the "dossier" screencap, only a part of that was actually handed over, but I wanted to see them sweat.

I'm not a magician who can see through the IP hashes, and I relied on them being dumb enough to confirm what posts they had made elsewhere. Once they could be positively linked to a single post then clicking the hash gives you the rest of their post history, but they had to fuck up and confirm their post first. Usually by gloating about it somewhere, because cocky faggots.

Since this thread's basically become the ggr general, does anyone know why there's so many sodomites over there? I mean, regardless of what you think of "lgbt" people, you have to admit that there's an insane amount of them on ggr.

It's kinda like how the Alt-Right talks about degeneracy, yet defends people like Blaire white, TRS, and Richard Spencer.

>>329594

Maybe this offers a partial answer.

>>329594

>>329597

What I don't get is the furries.

Of all the degeneracy there is to be found on the 'net, why? The most major thing in the overall group right now is a furfag themed blogsite that's pumping out forced memes and Polygon-tier clickbait.