/fringe/ - Fringe

I have it in my to-read list.

I think hollow earth is a combination of there being a time when a lot of stuff happened in underground cave systems (probably still does) and a time when the separation between the astral and the physical wasn’t so clear-cut due to humans having way more energy than they do nowadays.

Because of this I don’t think we could nowadays go and physically find an inner earth just like that.

In the astral, yes. There are highly conscious species, as well as pockets of “hellscapes” and lots of lost ghosts.

It’s a short book and I’m halfway through. I have the impression the author constructed a plausible legend from various real accounts. A reconstruction as it were of truth using fiction. A myth.

Alright I finished it. While very suggestive, if the Earth were shaped the way the book describes, gravity would not behave as it does. Due to its force attenuating with distance, the Earth would have to be much larger than it is now in order to behave like it does. An even then, it wouldn’t work for the inside surface.

>>140565

Maybe gravity doesn't work the way we think it does.

>>140568

Maybe, but experimentally it does, to the extent that we have experimented with it, behave as if an amount of matter will attract another amount of matter depending on how much of it is condensed in a given volume (mass and density). That is, the law of universal gravitation holds. And if the mass of the Earth was distributed as shown in the book, gravity would feel much lighter than it does, or the Earth would be much bigger than it is, with all the problems that implies for technology, navigation, astronomy, and even astrology as millions of people use it and experience it around the world. Of course you can cry conspiracy, but at that point, you can't trust anything without direct experience and we would need to go check if there is indeed a whole in the pole before continuing our discourse.

>>140565

>>140568

>>140572

Gravity is a Bill Nye larp that mundanes take for granted as true because it's embedded in language. You might as well blame things falling on "down-ness"

>cry conspiracy

You're probably that breadtube fag

>>140574

I'm not. I don't know what breatube is (and I don't care).

>Gravity is a Bill Nye larp that mundanes take for granted as true because it's embedded in language. You might as well blame things falling on "down-ness"

I honestly struggle to come up with a response to this (must be the flouride, am I right). I can't put myself in your shoes.

Gravity was conceptualized by Netwon (an occultist). And it won't be truly understood by science until scientists accept and explore the metaphysical origins of consciousness. This is because entropy, information and consciousness level (awareness, "vibration") are very closely related, if not analogous. Gravity relates to entropy gradients and what we call time, and light and mass are the ingredients through which they manifest in our subjective experience. If I sound obscure it's because I don't think there are words that can express these concepts. Only direct gnosis can do it.

>>140579

Isn't gravity now thought to be the distruption of space. Does it matter if that distribution is from mass or energy? The world doesn't have to be more massive if core energy plays a larger part in gravity then theories suggest.

>>140579

>must be the flouride, am I right

Actually your effeminate condescension is more of an atrazine vibe

I couldn't, if pressed 'prove' my cosmogony either so, touché

>>140579

Where can I read more about that?