>>52505
>I was more stating that people have more in common with some themes of Cyberpunk.
I'd say that reality has become more cyberpunk rather than everyone one the planet is a cyberpunk. Your examples were particularly egregious: Taxes have literally been around for at least 2,000 years, and predate virtually everything except agriculture. Amish paying taxes isn't high tech. Indigenous tribes acting territorial isn't failing to escape tech, its human behavior as old as time. My thought is that cyberpunks are supposed to be more technologically equipt and on the outskirt of societal norms involving technology than their peers. You see this Necromancer with Panther Moderns under going cosmetic body modification to look grotesque intentionally to signal themselves as outsiders. Its punk. I think a core feature is rejection of societal values, and by definition the majority of people cannot do that.
>I am concerned that governments do not seem to be addressing what is around the corner (which is not a surprise and is a trend in of itself).
The trend your talking about is not far from clear. Personally, I believe its extremely likely that automation within my lifetime will kill jobs in masse. But this perspective is something people have been saying since the 1920s. And as new technology has emerged, new jobs have emerged with it. Generally, people whoose jobs are automated away are not able to be retrained, but a new generation takes ups new jobs. Many economists argue that technology advance actually creates as many jobs as it displaces.
But, your idea that a sizable amount of people will be able to transition to STEM jobs is non-nonsensical. Already their not enough hard science jobs to match the number of people graduating with hard science degrees. And most people are not even remotely capable of the kind of analytic thought required for a B.S degree in a hard science, and beyond that, a B.S. in hard science isn't actually enough knowledge ot be economically useful. Its such a meme. Know one will pay you to solve the limited differential equations you can solve when CAS systems exist.
Furthermore, even if everyone could learn computer repair / security / programming (as compared to hard science degrees) , something I think is incredibly unlikely, you cannot have a functioning economy with only a IT sector. Its not a viable solution.
Also, do you know how to program ? Have you ever tried to teach people? Its simply impossible for many people.
>"Electronic waste or e-waste may be defined as discarded computers, office electronic equipment, entertainment device electronics, mobile phones, television sets, and refrigerators" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electronic_waste
I used to own a small PC repair shop. Most e-waste that comes in is absolute garbage. Occasionally we would source gems (~3 year old laptop , etc.) and we would refurbish and sell. Anything worth keeping we kept. We passed the rest, along with all the broken parts from computers we repaired to the next step in the chain, a company that picked up e-waste for free, hoping to sort, find what they could and scrap the rest. I garentee you, by the time it makes it to a 3rd world country, there is nothing there. Minor amounts of metal surrounded by tons of plastic. In technology to old to be useful even if it was working.
I also garentee you that you cannot fix modern electronics the way you think you can. Virtually everything is integrated circuits. Virtually everything is undocumented, schematics and spare parts do not exist. The chance that anyone will repair e-waste in a 3rd world country is minute. I hear that children pick through it looking for capacitors, which are scraped. Its a humanitarian tradedgy, but repair isn't possible the way you think.
>Throughout the documentary you will see electronics of all types in one piece.
You are seeing consumer electronics like old telephones, toasters, etc. You are seeing everything every e-waste company in the chain thought was too labour intensive to scrap. Its largely unrepairable, and valueless antiquated garbage. Remember how it got there.
>full of very salvageable electronics.
How do you know? So far you haven't seemed to understand how technology works. You believed a variety of untruths I pointed out in my first post.
> Must crack password to have usable machine if you have physical possession of laptop
> Computers decades old can be used to crack modern passwords.
etc.