>>3448
>With this competition for expression from computer programs, most people are effectively reduced to bots themselves in terms of public discourse.
Kids will be learning social cues from bots. They'll be growing up online observing content circulated by bots. Also I hear most traffic on the web comes from bots: https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2017/01/bots-bots-bots/515043/. The web is becoming a lot like 'The Matrix'.
>Another reminder that anyone intelligent needs to gather into enclaves and build their own parallel economy to weather this storm as well as can be.
If that's a no can do, would it help to migrate one's social media off YouRube and Fakebook and onto Club Penguin? Bots can't assimilate my characteristics if I'm disguised as a penguin.
>3450
>I recently read an interesting postulate by Peter Watts regarding this.
Interesting. I'd never heard of him. I see he quotes another person's article on this topic which ties this back to the Cambridge Analytica thread:
https://medium.com/join-scout/the-rise-of-the-weaponized-ai-propaganda-machine-86dac61668b
>By leveraging automated emotional manipulation alongside swarms of bots, Facebook dark posts, A/B testing, and fake news networks, a company called Cambridge Analytica has activated an invisible machine that preys on the personalities of individual voters to create large shifts in public opinion. Many of these technologies have been used individually to some effect before, but together they make up a nearly impenetrable voter manipulation machine that is quickly becoming the new deciding factor in elections around the world.
>>3455
My squiddie-sense is getting all tingly from this post.