/warroom/ - War Room

[LURK FIRST AND READ BELOW]

BASIC PROCEDURES

Gather Everyone In the AM and HIT 'Them' With Everything You Got in the PM! [POST STORM - THE WAVE]

[1] MEME, MEME and MEME some MOAR! Stay Focused on Current #HOTTOPICS

[2] Pick 2-3 hashes from https://botsentinel.com and use them to help get your #HASH out.

[3] Post @ 10-11Am | 12-3Pm | 6-9Pm EST

[4] Always Try to Post Meme/Cap/Vid/Article (Not just plain text)

[5] Use .@them to respond to all their following.

[6] Remember to be Quirky in your posts and ask question instead of making statement.

[7] RT other's tweets and Report Bots (New account, no followers, lots of RT's)

WR Class https://web.archive.org/web/20260120163654/https://fullchan.net/?fe34aa64eb8a4a8f#GEfZTe3cQN6xdXjm77oE1mtEW9RWSAbuh6Z6h1yj1mQL

NAVIGATION

>>7967 [S.T.F.U.] Positions

>>7954 Dig -> Meme -> Pray

>>7951 Operations Page

>>7958 Hash Board

>>7962 CALL FOR MEMES

>>7963 CALL FOR DIG

TWITTER

>>7955 Twitter Social Marketing

>>7956 Twitter Optics

>>877 FAQ Page

TOOLS

MEME WARRIOR UI 1.3 #240904: https://archive.is/3Pe0E

MEME CANNON https://github.com/QCodeFagNet/MemeCannon/

Download Twitter Vid: https://www.downloadtwittervideo.com/

Twitter Ghost Check: https://shadowban.yuzurisa.com/

Twitter Analytics: https://analytics.twitter.com/user/tweets

Twitter Manager: https://tweetdeck.com

Twitter Trends: https://twitter.com/i/trends

Hash Check: https://www.hashtags.org/

>>8670 Game Theory

>>7976 Tools and Services Page

Select Notables Ammo https://8kun.top/qresearch/catalog.html

Meme Ammo https://web.archive.org/web/20260120164619/https://fullchan.net/?f02e9b5ccc4b224c#5w3xpJM8SpX7FbX3xQQTNp5AffbWSeyGCgDVqisdW1F1

TRUST THE PLAN

DONALD TRUMP >>7959

Q >>>/qresearch/18777053

Letters to Friends and Family >>7960

Other Known Boards >>7961

SHUTDOWN

404 ERROR Bunker >> https://endchan.net/qrbunker/catalog.html

505 ERROR Bunker >> https://dis.tinychan.net/read/lounge/1668433295

CURRENT OPS

>>7968 Fade to Black

>>7970 Election Fraud

Secure Vote https://archive.ph/U0TzX

RINOS https://archive.ph/kuWML

Democrats https://archive.ph/fIQBh

Repeal 230 https://postimg.cc/Js2w3ZNk

Epstein Link Dump https://archive.ph/IRPYv

Uniparty https://archive.ph/YoGxB

Soros Antifa https://archive.ph/JwBwG

ANTIFA https://archive.is/ExaXr

DOUGH

https://web.archive.org/web/20260120165000/https://fullchan.net/?6cfb4682cc188c54#8EZEe78Mp1DnDSD31seq2razQR8331oum2TQUmimhjs9

easy game theory: Black Americans and illegal alien frauding somalis are currently mad at each other, share the reasons of Black Americans

>>8658

>>8659

>>8660

Great games to add to SCOTUS wins and Tariff income.

NOTED AND SHARED ON ALL PLATFORMS FOR THE NORMIES AND MYSELF

ty anon

>>8662

https://x.com/i/grok/share/9f62920bfea74a518c72a690f78901e3

list of people who have died around the clintons

>>8664

>TERMINATE THE FILIBUSTER

yup

its such a unique move that the way is unknown cuz its never been done

also its not very interesting to Normies

if you ask them what does filibuster mean they prolly don't know

thus i think the best move is to make cool memes which will get Normies thinking/moving

even Anons aren't sure how to meme about the filibuster

i suppose first we learn about removing the filibuster, then we make it a cool move where even Normies want it to happen as shown by how they spread our memes and repeat our arguments (not out of blind loyalty but cuz they are strong arguments)

thank you Anons

>>8667

https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/115923723486523883

Jan 19, 2026, 12:47 PM

>>8665

>even Anons aren't sure how to meme about the filibuster

right lol

still thinking on this one

pass the SAVE Act..

https://x.com/ScottPresler/status/2013590370035056682

>>8713, >>8669

Are your talking about this in more than one sense?

If so, isn't clarifying the problem an effective method?

>>8711

Ah, it looks like fun

>>8714

>filibuster

If talking about Congress, wouldn't that also include a legal perspective?

And won't changing the law just prolong the 'filibuster' because it can take time?

As for things that prolong time by not drawing a conclusion or avoiding the point at issue (such as delaying things that don't improve), isn't it proven that continuing to clarify the problem also includes not presenting improvements or ideas?

I also think it will be an opportunity for the public to recognize it

>>8716

I think that using such MEME is useful for raising awareness of superficial problems

What I'm talking about is focusing on more fundamental issues, and I'm talking about ideas for making things even better

I think it's more efficient to RT things like that on Twitter, etc., because you can RT them with a single button, but I think this space is very efficient when you want to focus on deeper issues, and I don't think people who can't speak up because of the opinions and viewpoints of those around them have no reason to remain silent here

>>8717

>fundamental issues,

The fundamental issue is BOTH sides of the gov are the problem.

Solution: Remove them all

but for now, try to get normies to understand the effect the filibuster is having on america may be a good path to show

mr dem senator used the filibuster to block such and such.

Article.cap.link.researched

show the people why the filibuster is hindering progress may work, and then to pull memes from that may the route. or im completely off?

thoughts?

forgive am still low to mid level here.

>>8718

I thought I had already presented the idea

I went so far as to say that by clarifying the problem, it is constructive and effective to connect not only to the superficial problem but also to the fundamental problem

I'm not sure what level you're talking about, but

The method of repeatedly using the exact same image and summarized information is already being used repeatedly by anon who have information about the Vati-can

In other words, are you telling them to increase the methods mentioned above?

If wanted to increase the numbers, advertising in the media would probably help

Although this anon doesn't have that kind of money

>Solution: Remove them all

^Is this about censorship or delete recording?

Or is it about physical removal?

Or is it just a statement that you want they gone?(remove?)

>>8719 ID changed

^ >>8717 (me)

Filibuster

>>8665

>first we learn about removing the filibuste

I agree and have researched it a bit

simple majority is needed

>>8714

>Are your talking about this in more than one sense?

I dont believe I am. I am speaking in the sense that the filibuster needs to be addressed as many are under the impression that To end a

Senate filibuster on most legislation, you need a "cloture" vote of 60 Senators to cut off debate

>>8714

> clarifying the problem an effective method?

The problem is the filibuster can also be removed entirely by the majority party using the "nuclear option" (a simple majority vote to change Senate rules)

Thus not removing the filibuster itself but redefining its removal standards

>>8714

>Ah, it looks like fun

thanks anon, a culmination of a few anons here. you may be one of them

>>8715

>If talking about Congress, wouldn't that also include a legal perspective?

yes if we were indeed trying to remove it from ever occurring again, but I have a feeling this is just for adjusting the filibuster Stance on what is the Majority

>And won't changing the law just prolong the 'filibuster' because it can take time?

see above

>>8717

>I think that using such MEME is useful for raising awareness of superficial problems

It may and hopefully other dig in to find the deeper issue. I think of it as a breadcrumb leading the researcher to a path of deeper knowledge

>>8717

>What I'm talking about is focusing on more fundamental issues, and I'm talking about ideas for making things even better

I am listening, and reviewing your post over and over

>>8718

>Solution: Remove them all

impeach.recall.censure

>>8719

>I thought I had already presented the idea

you have, but it takes a moment for processing for me as i like to review and review

The main issue i see is that people do not know that a simple majority is needed to stop a filibuster. I never knew till i researched it.

-again could be wrong here

>>8719

> it is constructive and effective to connect not only to the superficial problem but also to the fundamental problem

I would say that Potus gives us the superficial issues and our researches find the fundamental issues

superficial - this legistlation failed due to dem filibuster

fundamentally the dem is corrupt and no GOP senator has a backbone (Thus remove them all)

>>8719

>The method of repeatedly using the exact same image and summarized information is already being used repeatedly

repetition builds reputation

I will often revert back to the same "old" memes myself, or repost the same op over and over again. just as vatican does.

>>8719

>In other words, are you telling them to increase the methods mentioned above?

no, i do not share that. Every anon has there own will and mind, I just push the superficial mostly as researches on the main board are professionals in their research and will find the fundamental issues associated. if no anons pick up, then i begin the deeper research and share, share, share. then re meme

>>8719

>advertising in the media

the account would be shut down same day

>>8719

>Or is it just a statement that you want they gone?(remove?)

this

Again The fundamental issue i know of is that the people do not know that a simple majority will stop a filibuster, and thus they do not push their constituents to end it

I hope this layout is a better idea of what i am suggesting and the plan of attacks i work with

>meme superficial

>wait for diggers to find deeper insights

>share share share ^^^^

>create deeper fundamental memes

Superficial Meme >Nuke the filibuster

Fundamental Meme >Simple Majority to End a filibuster

Thoughts?

and thank you for the exercise anon

>>8721

Thank you for your detailed reply

Understanded that the filibuster you're talking is about Congress

In other words, is it correct to say that it's a matter of majority vote?

(So, gathering on a transparent platform may be one possible action to actually make people thinking in majority rule)

(I am concerned about the problems that may arise from grouping)

In that case, I think it's essential to approach public awareness

(Well, I think that's still happening now)

I think it's effective to go from explicit content to a fundamental approach

I think it would be effective if more people started to approach the issues from a superficial perspective to a more fundamental one

By explicit approach, I mean approaches such as MEMEs, which I think are visually effective as well

Of course, simply pushing repeated information can come across as propaganda, so I think it's important to take a more fundamental approach, one that allows for further clarification

That's why I think it's very important to connect to this platform (8kun/ch) (to raise awareness)

I also think that a movement to place even more importance on this platform is extremely necessary in order to improve the problems of clickbait and de-platforming, which hinder fundamental -understanding

This is one of the things that I thought about when I arrived at this point

>exercise

^Hmmm(don't really understand), I'm seriously having fun

>>8723 add

This is also intended to determine which ideas are most constructive/effective or important or necessary.