/warroom/ - War Room

>>8545

Oh watched all of it adn enjoyed that day till the sun set. <3

>>8546

Ok will pick back up on Ukraine and Past Criminal Acts and reinforce it

07

>>8546 Repost for Eyes on

>>>/qresearch/23737001

>>8551

Vice President Joe Biden extorted the Ukrainian government into firing Shokin to thwart an investigation into Burisma,

Why do 3 US congressmen have family on the board of busisma?

>>8555

>thank you Anon

takes a moment to swing back to here. lol

but always an enjoyment.

lots going on

antifa

shutdown

judges

economy

inflation

birthrate

immigrants

>>8556

nice1, meme cannons loading

SERIOUS NIGHT SHIFT QUESTION

Do we terminate the filibuster or preserve it?

pretty sure at one time we fought to save it and now potus calls for termination.

is this to get the democrats to fight to save it, or are we suppose to fight now to end it?

>>8558

tyty

>>8555

>>>/qresearch/23821941

NCSWIC

but was never sd when its coming.

days months years eons?

is it up to us to determine the time?

do we force the reveal

do anons need to be focused on target

END THE FILIBUSTER

enough saying this phrase gets it done?

enough demanding their rep get it done?

has the population be shown?

do they just need a lead?

who runs these ops?

ANONS DO!!!

o7

>>8564

>END THE FILIBUSTER

This is not a denial of 'DJT' statements

It is not an endorsement of FILIBUSTER

(It's not focused on talking about parliamentary tactic)

Does this also refer to groupings in other countries?("irregular military adventurers"?)

Or is it about parliamentary action only?

Or a repetition of unclear information?

A move/action that doesn't seek to clarify things?

(Has there been any clear theory, logic, proof, or clear explanation?)

Which moves fit the definition?

Also, what would be a constructive move?

Is it possible that events like this are conveying some kind of message?

This post focuses on group think or group(cultic case etc)action(Movement buster?)

In my country, there have been attempts to use this movement to form groups

(About the group, which was created in cooperation with foreigners and/or about: grouping/group think)

I'm not saying this is all a bad move,

It's true that there have been more opportunities to raise awareness of this movement, but on the other hand, think it has also created unnecessary division

Also need to consider that the situation and people's perceptions are changing every day

In fact, in my country, groups talking about Q engaged in a slanderous battle

I have actually seen people leave this movement(Things that are the result of group think action etc)

Of course, this movement is an information warfare, so if you are not fully prepared, you could be hurt, but I still think there was unnecessary division

Is this movement about grouping, gathering followers, and coordinating 'XYZ' and validity?

It may certainly be a normal confrontational movement, but does that mean are modeling ourselves after the same movements as our enemies?

They are deploying losing tactics, so will they be successful by emulating them?

etc, etc, etc,

>>8567

Well, could go into many examples, but

if we were to apply transparency as a solution to these problems, wouldn't it be effective to make the group think process and results transparent?

That is, for example, if everything that was discussed in the group were made public, wouldn't it also become clear whether the group was legitimate?

Or whether the group think was constructive/effective?

Can they clearly disclose those processes and results?

(Transparency(necessary topic etc) and accountability)

If it is correct and true, the group will be recognized and this will lead to the expansion of the movement

Wouldn't the problem be improved just by using such a highly transparent platform?

(And there will be no need to go to the trouble of clarifying the problem or insisting on transparency)

(Also, won't this prevent the group from going out of control?)(think: risk)

Does this seem like panic?

Does it seem like a complaint?

I simply observed the movement, pointed out the real issues within it, and embodied a movement for improvement

How can a war end without discussion/towards peace argument?

If discussion/towards peace argument or clear explain is not necessary, how can truth and justice be proven?

(If it weren't necessary, there would already be a much more devastating war)(think so)

If there are differences in perspectives due to brainwashing and the effects of individual view point, isn't a process of clarifying things necessary?

So what/who is unclear/opaque?

Also, why does this happen?

Does it involve problems with group think or personal attacks through grouping?

Also, are individual identification through group and targeting and attacks by groups a problem?

Also, is there a risk of physical violence between group members?

(Can you say for sure that there is no real harm?)

If you have everything, check it out

or These finer details are best left to those with greater technical access

Also, the group thinker have already exposed themselves

Does grouping come with responsibility?

Examples of actions that slow the growth of this movement include actions that discourage people from joining the movement?

Or is this a movement that only applies to a select few?

I also recommended joining /qresearch/ and 8kun/ch as a solution to these issues

They denied it

It appears that some people have expressed their intention to participate, but to me this does not seem like a move to truly follow 8kun/ch

(Well, if they're anti-8kun/ch, that might make sense)

(It might also be defined as a move/action of what they value)

This is because they appear to prioritize their preferred platforms and group think over this platform

Wouldn't improving these issues lead to the expansion further of this movement?

These are reports of my experiences and what I have learned

I am truly looking for constructive selects

Also, is the impact of grouping currently good or bad?

And are there other, better ways?

If group think is constructive/effective, does that mean that from now on everyone who joins this movement should form a group?

Will this lead to more unnecessary conflict, unclear and blindness?

Is it actually constructive/effective?

Also, when I asked questions about some things I didn't understand, I never got a clear response

Hence, This post is also intended to clarify these points

and Also, I posted here from a strategic perspective

(Is (group think) a strategic move?)

(What are the constructive, and effective to clear reasons?)

(Is grouping necessary to concentrate on research?)(Does it vary from person to person?)

(Also, it's possible to talk to anons here without creating a group, and if the conversation is in a transparent environment, wouldn't there be fewer problems than in a closed group chat? or Wouldn't that also eliminate the risk of group attacks etc?)

(my case: Or, when focus on research or creating words, group think inevitably becomes impossible)

Also, if there are people who think that it would be more constructive to do nothing, not think for themselves, and just spend their days aimlessly, rather than expressing such thoughts, I think a clear explanation of this would also make clear the best choice

P.S

Ty, Warroom

I've learned a lot from your catalog creation(topic) and your Practical ideas and movements in this digital space

>>8568

07

>8:17 AM

>8

>17

>Q+ proof?

>well played Anons, thank you kek

Dec 26, 2025, 8:17 AM

https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/115786765163808034

Donald J. Trump

@realDonaldTrump

·

12h

It’s time to end the filibuster: washingtonpost.com/opinions/20

>>8564

>but was never sd when its coming.

list the events that have 'came' so far

4example: secure borders, no tax on tips, less money to foreign countries, fraud exposure, moar epstein pics, etc

re end the filibuster: filibuster will end when?

thank you Anons

>>8571

>It’s time to end the filibuster

>>8572

will come back to this

bed shift rn

>>8571

reposted

>>8572

about a year ago came across a anti trump anon cell.

have been fighting them ever since

1000 bans and a year later they are done with the fight and have started to listen

did not think this possible, but perservered and seems making headway in spreading the q news and what is coming

still a few give me hell, but no bans in a month.

WINNING

also using the alias Quantum have them call me Q for short

DONT DOX ME Q o/

Think im getting the hang of psychological warfare XD

THANK (YOU) ANON

Secondary keeping tabls on the board and upto date on notables and pushing secure the vote as well as twitter war

1 year to go. :)

Make Arrests Great Again

>>8576

Why not truth social?

Does that have anything to do with your popularity or name promotion?

Broadly speaking(?), 'Q' for people (Q)(I think so), but the actual 'Q' posts use tripcodes

Also, do you think the posts that mentioned 'tripcodes' in 'Q' past activities have any connection to the importance of tripcodes?

This could be considered disinfo(Maybe could define it that way) but I think it's a message about the importance of tripcodes

There are already many people who speak of the name 'Q', but I think that doing so on an outside platform and raising money for 'selfish gain' is misleading this movement

Thinking about it further, I thought that issues such as using the name 'Q' for 'selfish' purposes on outside platforms could be resolved by limiting it to tripcodes(tripcode itself is a unique feature) and posts on 8kun/ch(think so)

Well, some people have come to the trouble of connecting to outside platforms, but I think that would just create further contradictions

If that's the case, then isn't it illogical and therefore no longer true?

and What do you do with your following once you have it?

Well, whatever the case may be, I think the truth will come out no matter where 'Q' is held

>>8577 (me)

To avoid misunderstanding,

this is not about an approach to silence

Rather, I think the level of archiving and record-keeping here on 8kun/ch is much higher than on any other platform

Would you post your important ideas to a place where they could potentially be deleted?

I think that the generation of ideas is extremely valuable, so I do not post important information in places known for strict censorship and deletion, nor do I encourage others to post and risk having their valuable ideas erased

This is because those ideas could become valuable assets for the future

Even if my own ideas don't help the people close to me, I think that the ideas of strangers far away might help those close to me

fraud across the land

110 million+ views for Nick Shirley, is there interest?

2026 soon

once again the goal to win is easy to SEE for Anons

secure elections, inform Normies, vote out all dem rino leaders; if ppl knew about swamp there would be no swamp

much hinges on 2026 results, 2 very dif timelines come from those elections

if WE lose 2 years of lameness and difficult 2028 elections

if WE win 2 moar years of American recovery ready for 2028 elections

working together makes jobs easier

focus keeps the correct direction

rest repairs the brain

peaceful ideas mined like ore or gold, both useful in dif ways

win 2026

thank you Anons

>>8579

Haven't you won yet?

What is win to you?

The topic of this catalog is a difficult one that I would never want to imitate, but it is a very thoughtful and enjoyable catalog topic

Isn't the very existence of such a space, and the fact that it has been preserved and continued, a victory/win?

P.S

For me, I'm tired of being the center of attention, so that's not a win

If I had to define it, I would say that a victory would be when humanity evolves to the point where it can choose between life and death for itself

Moreover, this is a process, and one of my definitions of victory

Or, for me, this is one example of clearing a game if I think of life as a game

If I said something like this, the past 'Q' might tell me that this is not a game

>>8580

Is the act of defining something a sign of breadth of thought?

>>8580

>humanity evolves to the point where it can choose

perhaps the process includes leaders who hate attention or the group cannot advance

its easy to fall into the habit of straight zero-sum game theory; deeper consideration SHOWs a simple piece-for-piece game is brutal for a Citizens

'like a game (that is not a game)'

like a game makes moves easy using straight cold logic

that is not a game includes the humans facing consequences of your moves

sometimes i feel like all their eyes watching and i can't fail them which reminds me it will take help from ALL to win; that day will be like a miracle and i am full of Faith

kek

>>8582

Um, is that about the strategy of becoming a fame fag?

Will you run for office after that?

Oh, that sounds like it will take a very long time, how long do you think it will take?

The confession of faith might get a better response in a different catalog

Naturally, your definition of victory and my definition of victory are different, so I'm just thinking about what's best and fastest for humanity and the world

Or would you like to discuss true freedom and peace?

>>8567

re grouping

i suppose groups exist whether you create them or not

when something exist regardless it can be like a tool (and/or weapon)

the wrench exist, should i use it or not use it?

i know this is oversimplifying but it helps view the big picture sometimes

it fails on larger situations such as nuclear energy, ai, deep space travel; those benefits chase their tails until suddenly you are arguing against yourself kek

>groups exist

thus use grouping rules and building methods and respect to nudge a GOOD group into performing greatness

kek imo

>>8098

>Faith

>>8582

I don't think this movement is about groups

>game theory; deeper consideration SHOWs a simple piece-for-piece game is brutal for a Citizens

^If so, this platform is perfect

It's good to know you're not alone

If someone is disappointed in you, you don't know if it's truly working

It is possible to create logic from emotions, but incorporating emotional thoughts into logical thinking can easily become illogical

I have to go soon

>>8586

some ppl play solo, some play groups

some combine groups

choice belongs to the player of the game (that is not a game)

>>8536

>all the world is a stage

>>8585

>complicated moves are not comprehended by Newbies/Normies

If you are the poster, I think you can help others by explaining it in an easy-to-understand way

If you have faith, that could be a great help.

I also thought of this catalog as a place to make complex movements easier to understand

>>8589

>explaining it in an easy-to-understand way

that is the hardest part

how do you explain 5d chess?

kek

>>8587

If that group playfulness is hurting people, then it's no longer a game

I'm going now

However, I will definitely be back, and I'll let you know that my ID will be different when I do

>>8100

>being stollen from is an honor

hard to explain sometimes but Anons usually get it right away

kek

>>8591

>then it's no longer a game

it was never a game, it jus seems like a game sometimes

>>8590

>5D chess

I explained it

If I have the opportunity, I'll try to explain it a little more clearly

bye

>>8591 me

>>8593

For those who are able to move away from the bystanders or problem groups, it may feel like a game

Also, whether it's a game or not, I don't think it's constructive at all.

It's true that this movement can be painful at times,

but I don't think there's any need to experience the same kind of influence as (((they))) just by participating in this movement,

and if problems similar to those of (((they))) arise in this movement, I think it's within the scope of what participants in this movement can do to address them, but isn't it necessary to encourage improvements and exchange ideas?

>>8595

>>8591

It seems the ID hasn't changed

However, I don't know when the ID will change