/tkr/ - Tickling Refuge

>>10528

Just a reminder, she's canonically silly ticklish~

>>10529

I feel like Corrin is a girl you could legitimately get all the way to third base with by tickling the living hell out of her and taking advantage of her scrambled giggly thoughts, and in the end would probably let you get away with it.

>>10512

I'd really want to have a go at haydee, the entire character is just such a massive tease for me, in every way.

>>10532

The thing about robots/androids/etc my mind always goes to is that there's probably a way you could tinker with their programming to make it so your favorite spots on their body are just atrociously ticklish, or so they become massive tickle sluts, or so that they hate being tickled but still get hopelessly turned on by it, and many, many other things. Lots of room for creativity when inputing the right code is all you need to make them your perfect 'lee.

>>10533

the other fun bit is that they could be totally serious, stoic and unfeeling, but a little sensation that they've never experienced before throws them completely out of it,

my favorite version of this being robots that are service or task oriented, like a sexbot, that you dig a reaction out of, or an otherwise impervious combat model that has a couple weak points built in as a failsafe.

robots are essentially the peak form of that stoic/hard to crack personality.

I also love it from the aspect that a sexbot or pseudosexbot/cyborg like haydee would probably be used to all the typical or vanilla types of use or misuse, but introduce her to some tickle trials and all that perfect sultry sway she has would be in danger of collapsing into twitchy giggles.

but it's all just pretense for wanting to get behind her while she's trying to navigate some obstacle, sliding my hands up her nothing one piece and digging my fingers into that tummy, frankly.

>>10564

no, unfortunately not.

>>10560

Need I point out the obvious particular spot I'd personally like to abuse? Imagining her losing it from some nails sliding across it is quite nice. Also, I agree, it's particularly rewarding to imagine a cold stoic machine to be utterly confused that something so simple could break their composure so throughly and struggling to even process the overwhelming input. It's kind of like warriors or tough women being tickled to tears, you know? It's fun to take them down a peg

>>10564

A man can always dream anon.

>>10567

Was her ticklish spot ever even specified in that FE:A support discussion? It's most likely in her upper body anyways since it's hard to spontaneously tickle a standing woman through her shoes. In my mind she naturally is ticklish all over.

>>10514

I feel you, but at the same time I find it funny when people try to tickle me expecting a reaction and end up getting nothing.

Alright, I got something on my mind and would like to discuss it: personally, just how comfortable are you with non-con tickling? I think most people with this fetish are probably at least OK with it and/or are mostly willing to ignore it for the sake of a fap, after all, it's at least implied in the vast majority of artwork out there. But… how far would you go with it in reality?

Hear me out now, this is still nothing but a hypothetical scenario, but let's say there was some sort of service out there, right? You call, you give a name, and later get a copy of a video of whoever you named being kidnapped and tickle tortured until exhaustion. Let's take it one step further and say the service is completely safe and untraceable, that person is not being harmed in any way (even mentally, some sort of drug makes them forget it happened at all), and nothing changes negatively for you or them at all, except you now have a video of whoever getting legitimately tickle tortured, no mercy, no safeword, no nothing, for hours on end until they really can't take it…

Would you do it? Would you use the service?

And how about the reversal of that? What if I told you that, if you're a 'lee and frequent this board, there's a chance the one that will be taken is you? Again, completely safe, you don't have to forget about it if you don't want to but you can choose to, and you will even be tickled by people you considere attractive, just to sweeten the deal. But it's truly non-con, they won't stop until they've completely wrecked you and they are satisfied, not you. It can happen whenever, and no ammount of begging will get you any mercy whatsoever once they have you, and there's nothing you can do to stop it or preventing it from happening, even multiple times.

How would you feel about that?

>inb4 fbi open up

Alright, you got me. It's me, actually, I'm starting the service. It's just me, a black van and a bottle of chloroform. Feel free to let me know who you want kidnapped. Also, I know where you live.

>>13365

Hmm… let's just say whatever you consider affordable enough for high quality tickle smut, just so money doesn't matter much. Can't sell or share the video though, you would definitely get in trouble.

Also, if you're the one getting kidnapped you pay nothing.

>>13370

Yeah, I'm trying to take out the consequences so it's less of a morality thing and more of a plain test of your personal limits: would you get off on someone genuinely experiencing fear and suffering for your twisted perverted pleasure and directly as a result of your actions? Not even a horrifically ticklish amateur model that doesn't really know what she's getting into and signs up for like a half hour shoot, but someone that literally knows nothing about what's happening or why and has no idea how bad the tickle torture is going to get until it escalates to the point they physically can't take it any longer.

I respect you don't give a crap about the drawn stuff lol, I don't think most people really do there. A good portion of the most famous tickle scenes that probably gave us the fetish in the first place are non-con to begin with, so…

>>13373

>would you get off on someone genuinely experiencing fear and suffering for your twisted perverted pleasure and directly as a result of your actions

You made it sound worse

Now I'm hard, AND questioning the morality of my life choices.

But personally, no, I wouldn't do that super villain level stuff just to fulfill my sexual needs.

I feel like there's something I must add, but that's all. It really depends a lot on your altruist behavior.

Besides… With the money I'd have to pay for the operation, I could hire a model and do everything legally. Of course results wouldn't be the same, though. It's more about the person who's going to suffer for my actions than about how legal it is, considering most people (me included) can't care less about some stuff being ilegal. Welp I guess I'm just empathic!

>>13373

>would you get off on someone genuinely experiencing fear and suffering for your twisted perverted pleasure and directly as a result of your actions?

What about you, Anon? Would you think with the brain or with the dick?

What are your personal limits?

>>13380

>something thrilling and exciting about having some poor girl with no prior experience get absolutely tickle wrecked in a non con way.

I have to imagine that's kind of both the Holy Grail and the ultimate forbidden fruit of this fetish for a lot of people, personally the fact it's so screwed up only makes it harder to resist for that part inside me that revels in knowing a 'lee is being pushed to their limit.

And elaborating on the video, nothing directly sexual would happen, but you can be certain heavily restrictive bondage would be in play and that every single spot would be used against her in the most ticklish fashion possible, and I mean every single spot.

>>13387

Hahaha, I was just trying to make it clearer, honest. Again, don't think about the money, whatever it costs you can ultimately afford it just by saving up a bit, or about legality, remember it's guaranteed to be consequence free. And morally I think it's just straight up gray: like, if I were to take it one degree further and say "Well, it's not a real person getting tickled actually, they just use some supercomputer to create a perfect simulation indistinguishable from reality" then I think pretty much everybody would agree it's esentially as harmless as all the hentai of girls getting tickled tortured to insanity or something out there, even though the net effect of it all is exactly the same in the end. But that would be boring by comparison, wouldn't it?

>>13390

I would fucking do it, I don't think I could resist. I wanna believe once I saw the actual thing it would be too dark and I would never do it again, but there's a part of me that's afraid this would turn into a straight up addiction to seeing anybody I want being tickle tortured until they break and I'd end up dead from excessive masturbation in a month or two.

I'm also surprised nobody has pointed out the practical use of this thing yet, that sort of makes it a lot better: you could potentially use it to capture someone you really dislike and just send them to a literal tickle hell for a while. That cheerleader that laughed at you when you asked her out in highschool? That bitch of a boss you had in your first part time job? The ex that cheated on you? All of a sudden you can see them at their absolute lowest, just crying and begging and laughing with absolutely no dignity, mercy or power whatsoever until they think they're going to be tickled to death. Sure, they wouldn't actually know anything happened at all in the end, but you would know. Maybe you can even pay a little extra for the kidnappers to tell them they're going to be tickled until they snap because of you, just so it's extra spicy when they look at the camera and plead for you to stop the tickling torture.

>>13391

It's definitely not just you, I promise. It's too tempting, I think, to know you could get away with something in reality that you can normally only see in fiction, specially if you get to call the shots on who receives the devilish tickle punishment yourself.

>>13402

if I was going to do this, I'd have to be the one who was doing the tickling, the half-measure would just make me feel like i paid to get myself tickle cucked.

>>13403

>When it comes to getting revenge from someone, though… Things might definitely change.

Hoho, so tickling retribution gets a pass then? Can't say I blame you. I want to imagine someone had a bully they had a crush on growing up and this service would just tie everything up together neatly for them.

I wonder if there could be a 'degree of separation' thing too? Like maybe you'd feel horrible sending the cute next door neighbor you say hi to sometimes to tickle hell, but if the service was literal magic, and they could get anyone in the world, you'd find it easier to have a famous actress or maybe even a tickle model lose her mind for you. Maybe harder to resist as well?

>>13423

I mean first of all, you raise an interesting question: I assume anybody willing to pay for the video would be more than willing to join in in person, but would the plus of getting to be the 'ler convince some of those that said no in the first place to do it? I wonder.

But let's take that and make it a bit more interesting: let's say that you could be the tickler, alright? Same deal, they'll handle the kidnapping, the cleanup, everyting, you can even request them to help if you want to get some gang tickles going and not to do the whole thing solo, plus it's an affordable price as well. And remember, in the end, no real consequences. But, if you take the deal, only they get to decide when the torture has been intense and thorough enough, and only then can you stop. And remember, these guys are psychos: you can't walk out when she's sobbing and pleading and about to pass out, you can't give her breaks or take it easy either, you can only take this option if you're willing to, by your own hand, break this 'lee so throughly they're begging you to just rape them instead of continuing to make them go insane with tickling towards the end, and then keep going, if that's what it takes for them to be satisfied.

Would you have the balls, anon? To go all the way?

I don't know if I would. Even in the video, if it gets that bad I'd probably fucking skip lol.

>>13361

>And how about the reversal of that? What if I told you that, if you're a 'lee and frequent this board, there's a chance the one that will be taken is you? Again, completely safe, you don't have to forget about it if you don't want to but you can choose to, and you will even be tickled by people you considere attractive, just to sweeten the deal. But it's truly non-con, they won't stop until they've completely wrecked you and they are satisfied, not you. It can happen whenever, and no ammount of begging will get you any mercy whatsoever once they have you, and there's nothing you can do to stop it or preventing it from happening, even multiple times.

need

>>13433

Just so you know anon, if I was a cute anime girl and I had the chance, I would tickle the absolute living hell out of you.

>>13619

It's nice to be so passionate about a 'ler (or a 'lee)~

>>13631

Yeah, I can maybe think of a few characters I'd be willing to go that far with, but if I'm being honest, in a context of reality I don't seriously think I could. I'd probably still watch the video up until that point though, which is pretty fucked up too lol

Now, if the 'lee had a tickling fetish, I think I could do it. Well, under certain circumstances, that is. If I somehow knew the 'lee has, as an example, been bragging about not needing a safeword, or fantasizing about experiencing what it'd be like to be broken by a truly merciless 'ler or visiting tickle hell or whatever. I guess if they're into non-con themselves is what I'm saying. At that point it'd just be fun to test their limits, you know? To both see how far their desire to be tickled could take them and to satisfy both our desires for cruel tickling.

>>13651

> Bakura from Yu-Gi-Oh

I'm… surprisingly okay with this.

Right, I went out of my way to make sure it isn't somehting you need to approach from a moral, legal or practical point of view (without going so far as to make it magic or whatever), because those aspects are pretty clear and not very interesting imo: of course you shouldn't put a random person through hell just to get off, it's morally wrong, illegal and probably impossible/dangerous/ridiculously expensive! Boring, right? The interesting aspect to tackle, the way I see it, is wether you, anon, would be comfortable fapping to the legitimate suffering and fear of a random person you chose only because you know you can get away with it. Remember, the 'lees won't face repercussions afterwards, but while it's happening, the experience and their reactions would be completely real and probably very traumatic. I'm betting on more than 30 minutes, but the real answer to the length issue is however much time it takes to make sure this person can physically take absolutely no more tickling punishment. Enough fear, torture and humilliation this would normally deeply alter their lives forever after. Except, of course, it doesn't.

It's ultimately up to your personal limits and nothing else: just how much are you willing to indulge in this sadistic pleasure you could take from watching someone else suffer intensely and realistically for your enjoyment? Not at all? Maybe once…? All the way…?

Ha, that other option is fun to consider too, you're right. My issue with it is that it gives folk like me who aren't ticklish and others that actually get off from it too much of an advantage, but I'm certain that would have an impact in the way anons have been approaching this scenario.

And I have to admit, as someone who would be an awful 'lee but fantasizes about being one often, I'm pretty tempted by the idea of being tickle tortured in such a fashion myself. I'm sure if I had a bit more context as to what really intense tickling feels like I'd have a different opinion on the matter, but in the context of an impossible scenario it's really fun to consider, I can see why you would be interested.

>I've been having some terribly sadistic, almost masochistic lee fantasies

>if the offer was instead guys who would tie me up and forcibly fuck my feet against my will

Anon, I… will allow it. If nothing else because, and I say this at the risk of sounding like a creep, you sound like you'd be pretty fun to mercilessly tickle torture and… in that other fashion you mentioned, and are very much tempting my own sadistic tendencies right now, which I didn't quite expect. I that a big fat "yes, I want it" then, if they were to cater to those other interests of yours?

>>13657

>You aren't ticklish but you fantasize about being a lee?

Sounds convoluted, I know. To elaborate a bit, I used to be ticklish growing up, so I'm familiar with the sensation, but nowadays tickling me will elicit barely an initial twitch before it devolves into a sort of awkward massage. I believe the reason I've ended up craving it despite knowing of my body's limitations is because I think women look incredibly attractive as ticklers, what with the long nails, teasing, smug smiles, and the mocking giggles as they poke and scratch and turn you into a hot mess of helpless giggling and panting and begging… Aight, imma stop there. There's something about imagining being in the receiving end of that that just makes me diamonds, despite being primarily a 'ler. And if I had to choose a type of 'ler I like, I'd say one that's seriously into tickling (and into me, obviously) as well: I want to know at every step of the way just how turned on they are getting by making me go crazier and crazier, to the point they're maybe a bit obsessed with tickle torturing me and it shows all too clearly. Oh and female, that too. Wouldn't exactly mind being tickled by a dude, but I probably wouldn't get much out of that tbqh.

So yeah, in my heart I'll always be a switch, even if my body only allows me to be a 'ler. To be fair, I've never been seriously tickled, I'm sure if I was tied up and in the hands of someone that really knows what they're doing, they'd be able to get a reaction out of me, but I doubt it'd ever be the ridiculously intense orgasm-inducing tickle frenzy I'm picturing.

>The big hurdle is the fact that I am dating

Ah, that'd complicate things for sure. I wouldn't blame you for taking the chance at least once if it were to arise though, I think everybody has that one fantasy they couldn't possibly resist.

Oh, and you did that alright, that'd be quite a sinister twist on giving a begging 'lee a 'break' from all the tickling. I really quite like it.

>>13659

>Wouldn't exactly mind being tickled by a dude, but I probably wouldn't get much out of that tbqh.

A forced orgasm is still an orgasm, bucko, and guys have their ways of getting what they want.

>>13664

>A forced orgasm is still an orgasm

Who said it'd have to be forced? In all seriousness, it's not that that wouldn't necessarily be hot, it's just female 'lers is what gets my motor running in the first place. Tickling, as far as being a 'lee goes for me, is more a byproduct of that. So take the hot girl away and it becomes a sort of 'all icing, no cake' situation. Pretty good sure, but it's missing something important.

Male 'lers t could be fun, admittedly, and maybe something of a shake up like that is what it'd take to get my nerves awake, but you know how in my proposed 'lee non-con scenario I said the 'ler would be someone you're attracted to? It'd turn out to be a girl for me, I'm sure.

>>13666

>but your own body betrays you while he's tickling and teasing you and leads you to fall into his traps.

You see Satan, I wouldn't consider that betrayal of my own body, but rather I just can't quite see it being as good for me as with a female 'ler. It'd be a neat surprise if it turned out it was though.

And yeah, that's some pretty good shit. I have a bit of a fascination with how an unintentionally erect cock is just a bigger target for forced tickling and pleasure, and teasing of the 'you're really begging for it, aren't you?' or 'you must love it so much, look how hard you are!' variety.

>Straight boys get milked until they submit.

Now, can I just sign up for this, even if I don't exactly count as straight?

>>13635

>Just so you know anon, if I was a cute anime girl and I had the chance, I would tickle the absolute living hell out of you.

If only…

>>13694

Life could be a dream…

>>13694

Invest in VR and hope for a long enough lifespan maybe…?

>>13715

>who am I to gatekeep you over the fantasy of having your cock milked over and over and over again until you're begging through tears in your eyes to give in to whatever your captors want?

God, anon… What am I supposed to do with all this… Energy now?

>>13740

>then we look at each other for a second and air high five from across the room

It's on. I'm free on saturday.

>>13726

>Invest in VR and hope for a long enough lifespan maybe…?

That would be something, but I'm also fine with being tickled by humans. i just wanna be forced to laff