>>8821
A problem is, the ""rational"" ""ists"" who have only a surface level understanding of philosophy, science, AI, and all the other rat shit (you know, the majority that doesn't even know programming and calculus), cannot defend them against even basic "what a bunch of neckbeard stemlords, here's why my college professor says you're wrong"-tier sneering. The stupidest refutations can appear nuanced to those. Ignoring outsiders who don't speak nerd blocks that kind of barely dressed up "criticism". It also blocks any possibility of pointing out some of us are way too autismal, but what can you do?
Also, letting goons lead you around is never good.