[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / random / 93 / biohzrd / hkacade / hkpnd / tct / utd / uy / yebalnia ]

/ratanon/ - Rationalists Anonymous

Remember when /ratanon/ was good?
Name
Email
Subject
REC
STOP
Comment *
File
Password (Randomized for file and post deletion; you may also set your own.)
Archive
* = required field[▶Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.
Embed
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Oekaki
Show oekaki applet
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Options

Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webp,webm, mp4, mov, pdf
Max filesize is16 MB.
Max image dimensions are15000 x15000.
You may upload5 per post.


File: 13d127cd9c3b0d7⋯.png (8.96 KB,232x48,29:6,logo_trans.png)

 No.6143

Politics is the mind killer

Shut up and mulitply

Reversed Stupidity Is Not Intelligence.

What can be destroyed by truth, should be

Beliefs should pay rent

Growth mindset. …yet!

Why do you believe what you believe?

…am I missing any slogans/catchphrases?

____________________________
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.6144

If (X), I wish to believe (X). If (not-X), I wish to believe (not-X).

And I suppose the actual question to discuss, since if it's meant to just be a compilation thread it'll be derailed soon anyway, is; are slogans/catchphrases, either in general or these ones specifically, good or bad for Less Wrong?

Personally, I think they're among the better rationality tools to come out of LessWrong, or at least, the best ones that are visible enough to still remember instead of just retroactively thinking the lesson is obvious or trivial.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.6145

Watch this "Shit rationalists say" video. It's pretty amazing:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jlT3MeCzVao

Original thread: http://lesswrong.com/lw/9ki/shit_rationalists_say/

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.6146

>Reversed Stupidity Is Not Intelligence

I feel like this is one of the more practical/relevant ones.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.6147

One LW thing I think is a little underrated is Parable of the Dagger, perhaps because there's no pithy phrase to sum it up. Essence being that sometimes words and social meaning have no connection at all to reality and that our first instinct is to trust anyway, or "yes, you *can* just go on the internet and tell lies".

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.6148

>>6144

I don't really think the question of 'good or bad for Less Wrong' is what we should be asking, but thank you for asking it.

What do we get from using slogans, where do they go wrong, and what would an alternative even look like?

They are very good at aligning your thinking once you remember them. Often times we fall into precisely the failure mode they are warning against. They directly connect our behavior to ways of if not solving, at least identifying problems in the first place. That is why we use them. We see a cached problem with a solution ready that can immediately link that to an explanation of said solution.

For example we fixed dictionary arguments because we know to 'taboo your words.' There is an easy to identify problem, and a clear action to take.

The bad parts are:

* non-rationalists see it as cultish

* new members have to learn a huge number of phrases

* hard to keep track of them all to even see in the moment where you done fucked up

Before we think of something better, how can we improve our use of slogans?

Look for ways people still make those errors and figure out how we could better improve their identification abilities, or strategies of dealing with the errors. Identification is largely pattern matching, so you can train people directly for that. Strategies require testing, but just slap on some A/B testing and strap some rationalists to torture devices and we'll get ideas real quick. Maybe actually do some psychological research on the side.

To find more errors to fix with slogans, watch for people going wrong and look at the sequence of events that lead them to where they are. Figure out where they went wrong and what they should have done instead. Apply psychology, game theory and shit to figure out why they didn't do that.

What would something even better look like?

To fill the same niche as a slogan it would need to easily connect problem situations to solutions and explanations. Additionally we'd want to have that without the cultishness and difficulties of remembering them in the moment or huge bank of terms to look up.

Alternatives that come to mind are mentors correcting mistakes as in a dojo, or everyone learning to identify mistakes in their own mind.

The problem with the latter is that even if it worked no one would be able to easily reference the explanations, and even if they could produce an explanation for what they were doing it wouldn't necessarily be the best for teaching others.

The former would be perhaps more directly and immediately useful. The teacher would have the long form reason for why it works and why they chose that version for instruction. Not everyone needs to know why everything works. You just need enough rationality to correct and improve upon the mistakes that you make. This is the sort of thing you see in situations of teaching non-rationalists: this is already in place in academia. You don't need to know why they chose that method, they're just trying to teach you physics with it.

I would expect a similar thing with rationality.

We can even get the best of figuring stuff out on your own here too. You don't need to know necessarily about the sunk cost fallacy if I can get you to internalize game theory. You'll recognize that it doesn't make sense to take an action based on past losses. We never need to invent a slogan for crying abandoned sunk costs, and we also get the benefits of having the right and proper explanations written up somewhere else.

The students of rationality can focus exclusively on the critical thinking aspect without getting caught up in the cultishness and jumble of phrases, and because they identified or solved a problem on their own they'll be far more prepared to identify and fix that problem in the future.

We'll probably need to give them the label for what is happening so they can properly discuss it, but that's different from a slogan. This also effectively allows us to integrate with academic terminology. You're given a problem, you identify and solve the problem in a couple different ways, you're given the word for the problem.

Our current way of doing things? Totally not a cult.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.6149

>>6148

Looking back at this post an hour or so later…

I wasn't clear enough about what I meant by the the second alternative.

*or each individual figuring out how to independently identify problems and generate fixes

This is something you'd want either way, and it doesn't really stand in opposition, nor as an alternative to connect problems or explanations. I didn't spend enough thinking about alternatives as I should have.

It also is vastly insufficient to actually generate solutions. People aren't going to magically figure out things like the sunk cost fallacy or associate it to other things and properly generalize it unless you sit them down in front of a problem that makes it distinct and clear that something is terribly wrong with their thinking.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.6150

>>6147

Parable of the Dagger is great for typical LW autists. It's a correction for a mental flaw that most of the population doesn't have, though.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.6151

>>6143

"Have You Read The Sequences?"

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.6152

>>6146

Today I wondered if treating reverse stupidity as intelligence is an evolved swarm intelligence technique that may actually be reasonable in some circumstances. Still not something the rationalist caste should do though.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.6154

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.6155

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.6156

halt, melt, catch fire

>>6155

Huh. Seems like that's mostly appeal to lowest common denominator. Easier than making an actually good product and sells better. But because the actually better alternative is there the people with sense use that one.

I think I now grok the intuition of the previous pondering: A heuristic for finding the better of two competing alternatives is to look for signs that one did not optimize for popularity.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.12496

>>6143

Rationalists should win

The map is not the territory

Adaptation-executers, not fitness-maximizers

Shut up and do the impossible!

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.



[Return][Go to top][Catalog][Nerve Center][Random][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[]
[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / random / 93 / biohzrd / hkacade / hkpnd / tct / utd / uy / yebalnia ]