No.10093
Some people say that the current version of the institutional EA movement looks like a network of closed, self-recommending organizations with questionable cost-effectiveness and low transparency (http://effective-altruism.com/ea/19e/effective_altruism_is_selfrecommending/), playing some kind of confidence game based on the brand monopolizing high-impact activities, the founder's effect, shady personal connections/power games and utilitarian calculations which don't take reciprocity - the foundation of sustainable ethical systems - into account. Do you agree with this viewpoint? Should we expect improvements? Can we Make Altruism Great Like Never Before?
____________________________
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.10094
>>10093
EA are a bunch of cucks, they have no idea what the good is and always make things worse.
Try talking with them about it and they all band together to insult and link you to asinine bullshit by some emo pseudophilosopher that proves how destroying forests to prevent insect suffering, giving all your money to Yudkowsky and breeding african obligate parasites is a Good Thing.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.10095
>>10094
> breeding african obligate parasites is a Good Thing.
Nigger, they hate malaria.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.10096
>>10095
Kek.
I meant the africans.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.10097
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.10098
>>10096
Africans aren't obligate parasites, they're opportunistic parasites. African-Americans in the land of the gibmedats and the home of white guilt, have adapted to be obligate parasites, but actual Africans are more often than not economically productive, and will no doubt be more so if they're healthier and longer-lived.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
