/random/ - random

>>162382

No! It doesn't break any social rules. Make a new account. It's not that hard.

creating a new account is too difficult and not worth the effort......

>>162423

Not really. It just needs an email address and a password. I have tons of email addresses. Gmail, Proton, Outlook... it's easy. I'm more worried about whether I'll scare the person off

>>162425

why would you need that many email addresses?

>>162429

Why not? Isn't it better this way?

>>162425

Proton mail is a scam. I don't receive any verification codes.

>>162431

i rarely get banned from websites which is why i don't need many email address(es).......

>>162433

It works fine for me. The storage thing is shitty if you're a free user and rely on a single address. It's not really a problem for me since I use multiple

>>162434

Not really about banning. If someone ever gain access to your only email then everything is there. But if you have a lot it's only a fraction of your stuff that's exposed

>>162438

do you watch anime whenever possible?

>>162440

I watch anime. I play games. I go on solo walks. I used to smoke but I don't anymore. I think I'm going to start drinking alcohol. And I stare at the ceiling or the walls. A lot

>>162447

do you watch MMD and Vocaloids?

>>162449

Yes. I've been planning to learn how to make mmds for a while now. But I keep on staring at the ceiling instead of actually trying. I'm very tired

>>162450

btw can you tell who on social media likely possesses/downloads real child porn? Are there any red flags?

Dude I made a thread about threatening a school shooting so my online female friend, not even girlfriend btw so she can talk to me, making a new account isn't so bad.

>>162466

Did you say a true threat?

>>162474

If it will happen or not depends on my mood

>>162475

Are you capable of doing it?

>>160786

>>162451

I'm probably not the right person to ask. I don't usually interact with these people. Besides it seems like everyone is accusing each other of this these days and I can't always tell if it's a serious accusation or not. I know that cp sometimes circulates in telegram groups. They generally hide it with generic names, like football groups or betting groups. It's probably more common in third world countries. I also think that some retard posted something here just yesterday/today? I scroll past these things because they disgust me. I'm more tolerant if it's fictional. And you won't find a serious cp website dedicated only to that from the get go generally speaking. You'll have to go through obvious spots (telegram) then ask people and with everyone leading you to a different website you'll find something highly illegal. Which is why it's hard to defend yourself if caught. I'm going off topic I think, but the point is that there is no reliable indicator to pinpoint exactly who does what

>>162477

If it ever happens I just hope it's not for his discord friend. That would be very humiliating

>>162478

well, if someone is talking about using Tor, then that's somewhat suspicious.....just mentioning that you download porn (of any kind) is a red flag because it is likely some of the downloads might contain real cp (even if it is from an adult porn site).

>>162481

If you download cp then you're an idiot because even if you delete it it sometimes can be retrieved. I know that for old phones even the factory reset wasn't deleting stuff for real, it actually just labels your bits as overwritable. In order to effectively delete content you'd have to fill your storage with useless stuff after the factory reset and then repeat the reset. That way what you can retrieve later on is useless. They used to film videos of walls that were hours long, since it's not really easy to fill up a storage of 100+ gigabytes with useless stuff. I heard that newer devices don't need all of this, but honestly I can't trust anyone about this. Everything can be traced back to you. I think that hardware manufacturers are legally required to be able to identify you. They can even have backdoor access to the components that you buy with your own money. Your own components. And even if they weren't under legal obligation they'd still do it. So if you download cp you probably need to go back to school because you're an absolute retard

>>162484

Not if you use a file editing app to edit the file to replace the original file with a copy, and delete it.

>>162490

Too time consuming if it's not an image or a short video. I don't think I'd have the patience to edit a 24 min long video if I can simply not download it and spare myself the effort

>>162484

well it is somewhat safer to access porn with an older device, I wouldn't trust the newer devices because they contain even more backdoors, and have even less security/privacy......

>>162493

You can just put a white image on top of the video and mute it.

Most people convicted of cp possession have lots of it. I heard there was a 261mb file here. That's probably 80 photos or a few videos. Privacy tools like GrapheneOS exist

>>162497

Graphene os lacks official support for devices other than Google pixels. I'm not buying a Google pixel. And to be honest no one normal that I've seen uses it. If you're going to use it then you'll probably need another device for daily life because a lot of things are not compatible. Same goes for Linux on pc. I like to play games. Some require kernel level anticheats. I'd much rather play my game than use linux since I don't think that what I'm doing requires a high level of privacy

>>162497

261mb doesn't sound like a lot honestly. Most people who make it on the headlines have tens, hundreds of gigabytes. Maybe 261mb doesn't sound serious enough for the news? I also think that the people who seed it are more likely to get caught. But to be honest I still don't want to deal with 261mb of cp. Even a single image. It simply doesn't appeal to me, so it's not worth risking some trouble

>>162500

what do you mean by activities that require high levels of privacy? I don't play pc games, so I don't need to use Windows.

>>162502

What if those people that don't have a lot of cp don't get on the news but still get caught? They go on the sex offender registry.

>>162504

Bad illegal stuff that is ethically bad, and "bad" illegal stuff that is not always ethically bad. Hackers that target big companies usually use Linux. I think I saw some news about one using Windows and he got exposed because they keep track of users with some sort of serial number, but I don't really remember the details. Sophisticated drug traffick systems use Linux in some countries. Some people who mine crypto use it, and crypto is not legal in all countries. They also say it makes mining more efficient. And of course some people who watch cp. And some people just use Linux for fun, for general safety like just in case even if they're not doing anything like the better safe than sorry logic or because they think that it makes them so cool and special and I absolutely hate these

>>162508

Yes, that's why I said maybe it doesn't sound serious enough for the news. And honestly I'm not so sure how they detect it, but i think that monitoring downloads with a scale of 10/100 mbs is a bit too costly? As sophisticated as the machines are the per second download rate across a country is too high to keep up with if your sampling size is 100mb

>>162512

All illegal stuff, that is social rule, before the fact not after the fact, is bad. Hackers are narcissists and are evil no matter who they target. You cannot do what normal people can't do. Crypto is legal in basically every country besides irrelevant ones. Linux has many OS'. Which one is used for cp?

>>162517

We are not currently discussing what is bad and good. I don't want every thread to diverge towards wolf and sheep. I believe it is useless to argue with you about that topic because that's ultimately what you wish to believe. You're not open to changing your mind, you're just stating your opinion to an audience

>crypto

Well irrelevant countries still exist. Are the people who live there not subjected to your good or bad logic? Or are they simply not people?

I'm not sure about which os' are used. And I don't think that you will get a reliable answer from me because I don't care about Linux and cp. And I doubt that the average cp watcher who uses Linux will answer you, because if they're using it for privacy purposes and are not like the performative retards then they're probably not that retarded and know that it's not safe to answer such a question. Just try to guess? I'm no linux specialist as I said but maybe I'll try to look into this later

>>162517

>Which one is used for cp?

more like, no intelligent person accesses cp content. The only Linux distro worth using is Ubuntu, all of the more advanced distro(s) don't offer anything worthwhile, and are not worth learning.

>>162520

How can I change my mind when I am correct?

Some variables have to be discarded. No one thinks about third worlders. They will never come to the first world. They see it as impossible as flying.

>>162477

If I wait a bit and play it smart

>>162521

Other distributions are used in real life. They're also worth learning in specific scenarios

>>162523

Rules that discard important variables are not rules. I wouldn't say that I found a solution to a distribution problem if I neglected half the original set on purpose. It simply makes no sense. The rules must be modified. Especially when it comes to topics that involve human dignity and rights

>>162524

I think he's actually asking whether you have it in you or not. Waiting a bit won't change a thing if you never had it in you. You'll probably have to wait a lot in an environment that's bad enough to actually drive you to do it. The worse the environment the less you have to wait. But then you also risk killing yourself while waiting if the environment is too bad. I'm not sure. Would you mind it if you killed yourself later?

>>162530

The environment does not matter. It affects the decisions you make, not if you can make them. Third worlders are dirt poor, their crime rates are still cappd at 1-3% of the population.Nearly the same as the first world besides the "ultra safe." There's no bad enough environment that leads you to give up cooperation to become a "lone wolf." The only giving up cooperation is withdrawal not action. This has been tested millions of times and cooperation is the best survival strategy for most people. Your potential is determined by the sperm and egg. Your training is determined by the environment.

>>162540

>cooperation is the best survival strategy for most people.

thanks for stating the obvious. Without cooperation, human society is impossible to function......

>>162540

Corruption affects crime rates. Do you even know what the police does in 3rd world countries? You'd go and report something that's not murder, they'll drown you in paperwork just so that you leave. Even if you know who did it, they'll tell you that they know this person and they cannot do it. They'll then call the felony and tell them that they targeted a very important person, have them pay up and take the money. A lot of people are too uneducated to actually know how to report a crime. I really wouldn't trust these rates. I'm not saying that it would be crazy high, but they're definitely not reliable

>>162530

What environment do you think someone needs to become a cop? A gated community? Where is that biology coming from? Cops do not cooperate. All cops started as political machines that could be bought directly before their pay increased. Now they can be bought indirectly. No one wants to be arrested, and people submit to cops out of fear. They are not cooperative.

>>162544

I don't see how cops are related to what I said

>>162545

They have extremely similar brains. You cannot say "Environment causes crimes" while saying "Some crimes are good."

>>162548

Why? Environment can contribute to someone being a criminal. This doesn't imply that the crimes they commit are good

I'm not saying that the environment you're living in is the sole factor that determines whether you are going to commit a crime or not. Of course there are other factors that affect that. But I don't think that neglecting the potential effect of it is right

If someone lost their mind and did something wrong, are they a bad person? I don't think so because I don't really consider someone crazy a "person". Not in the sense that they're below me, but rather in the sense that they lost something that makes judging them with the same set of morals I'd use to determine if someone is wrong or right incorrect and unfair

>>162576

You can't lose your mind if you're a normal person so they are a bad person. Why can't I be crazy? For something to be fair, everyone should have similar opportunities to be able to do it. All criminals are above me because they are powerful. Why would you need to put someone that's below you even more down?

That's what I said. Environment contributes but genetics are the main factor that can't be replicated. Many people are exposed to crime movies. They know how to commit crimes. Their inability to take major risks is the problem.

>>162583

Traumatic brain injury can do that. Or extreme shock

>>162589

I already mentioned that in >>160670.

>>162594

>>160670