/random/ - random

>>161825

He is a genius criminal. He did it with stealth, mastery, training, and intense focus. He is a specialist that dominated his goals. He did the unexpected. He changed the world.

>>161821

He deserved his high score, high iq saint, imagine if he sees europe today

>>161827

I'm sure he can. If USP inmates can smuggle phones. New Zealand prisoners will not have a problem with it.

>>161825 new zeland just ocupated by kebabs

>>161938

what is wrong with brown people? I thought they were good.....

>>161952

People are often judged by the most recent civilization that they or their ancestors came from. That civilization determines a lot socially about them. Because a Japanese is richer than an Indian in shared wealth and culture. The Japanese are more respected than an Indian. In Europe, a German is often treated better than a Hungarian because of wealth. Once Romania becomes richer, they will be treated like the Polish. Shared wealth determines your education level, your views on life, and how you grew up. It's a very obvious pattern.

>>161962

3rd worlders immigrate to the 1st world and bring their civilizations with them. Those flawed civilizations could cause the 1st world to turn into them and become poor. Hence, 3rd worlders should assimilate or leave. Other views want ethnostates, some have "honorary" exceptions.

I don't know how sketchy people enter the developed world.....

>>161984

They usually enter through legal immigration pathways.

>>161985

what country are you from?

>>161989

I do not recognize any governments. All governments are illegitimate. I do not want to be ruled by criminals. I live on a piece of the Earth. I follow the rules because I am chained to social cooperation.

>>161991

so you are implying you don't have autism?

>>161993

I do not have what is considered Autism. I was born normal. I was traumatized by social situations which can mimic "signs" of Autism. Like normal people, that turned inward. I don't seek revenge. I practice acceptance.

>>161997

so are you saying autistic people are abnormal? How are they abnormal?

>>162001

They are normal under my definition. I consider them Neurotypical, and criminals are Neurodivergent. What is considered Autism is considered abnormal. I am normal.

>>162002

are neurodivergent people illogical and irrational?

>>162012

Neurodivergent people under my definition, are geniuses because they are not controlled by other people. They can break social rules.

>>162038

nobody is capable of breaking social rules.....I follow all of the rules created by the government......

>>162045

That means you are Neurotypical.

>>162052

so do you detect any neurodivergent people on this site?

>>162056

Yes! Someone admitted to stealing when they were 6. Someone claimed they did jail time. That's two.

>>162062

how does one manage to steal? I didn't think that's possible with the large number of cops patrolling......

Islam is the answer of all of your questions be they "should I be allowed to kill my wife" to "should I have been allowed to be inside my wife when she was of the holy age of 9"? Convert now if you are against trannies and faggots

>>162080

I'm the one who stole. It was a pack of milk caps from a toy store, cops wouldn't intervene for something so trivial. And this was long ago, I'm an adult now so you can guess that's 12+ years. There weren't a lot of cameras around

>>162243

Why do you need cameras to stop you? I went to stores without cameras and I never stole.

>>162245

They wouldn't have stopped me. I'm just explaining that it was easier to get away

>>162247

How does it make it easier to get away? You can still be seen stealing.

>>162249

Someone can see you stealing.

>>162250

of course, every store is heavily monitored, you can't safely steal, it is impossible to hide stealing......

>>162253

Everyone knows that. The 6 year old thief is not a normal person,

>>162249

>>162250

If you were in a situation where you were exposed to danger A (cameras catching you) and danger B (people seeing you) wouldn't eliminating danger A make the situation more safe? It's still risky but less than before. And I already said that cameras or not I would've stolen

>>162254

I am not normal. Does that make me a bad person?

>>162254

i didn't even know 6 year old kids could steal, that sounds impossible......

>>162260

I did not either. I thought the physical action of committing a crime was impossible until they turned 18. A 6 year old stealing from a store is a massive indicator that they are not a normal person. It's shocking that they didn't get caught.

>>162259

It does make you a bad person. You are evil, antisocial. and heinous.

>>162258

It wouldn't. Normal people like me measure risk by the scale of consequences. The risk of getting caught, and the social consequences outweigh the benefit of choosing a different path. The shortcut pathways in social conforming situations for theft from stores do not exist in my brain. There is no bridge. Eliminating A would make no difference. I could be alone in a store and I would be focused on leaving, not stealing. The danger always exists. I think about what would happen socially and what people would think of me, and that I would be labeled a thief forever. I am scared of risks. If a normal person is traumatized, their survival response is seeking more cooperation and hyperempathy.

>>162258

Civilization cannot work without sheep like me. That's why other apes can't build one.

>>162275

They also can't build one because they can't pass down knowledge.

>>162274

Too bad then. Are wolves loners? Or do they form relationships with other wolves?

>>162277

Forgot to say that but I believe that what is right is not always what is approved by society. From a purely ethical perspective slavery is wrong and it always has been. But it was perceived as normal. Does that mean that having slaves was right? It wasn't

>>162278

It was. You can never break my moral framework. It was okay to own a slave back then. It is not okay to own a slave now because it socially wrong. This depends on the environment.

>>162277

Both.

>>161821

>got 8chan prime taken down

>it never came back nor ever will

Thanks faggot.

>>162285

>>162278

>this GAY banter

The bonds of slavery are not chains nor ropes but wages, moralfaggot. A slave as a word is a social construct and thus merely a label ergo it is fake and GAY identity politics. Stealing isn't immoral if it's from a mega-corp that took our small businesses away so as to enslave us to mega-corps. It's not even really stealing at that point; it's redistrubution of wealth.

>>162274

'Thieves' measure risk as well, thus they generally keep it under grand larceny amounts. The pigs won't chase you over nothing and you're harmed by NOT stealing if born poor. Not everyone is a beta begging for help in our society. How I got my first job was during shoplifting for beer wherein I applied to each location to work there. Had I ended up in a court of law my argument would have been "that's what they get for not hiring me".

>>162285

I don't care about your moral framework. And while I kind of understand what you're saying, you're ultimately a coward. You do not care about being right, you want to be accepted by people. If tomorrow murder becomes legal and everybody starts killing each other, you'll do it. Because according to you that's right. But murder is wrong. It can be justified and understandable, but it is wrong. You're afraid of being alone

>>162306

My knowledge about this topic is limited, so I cannot argue with what you're saying. But do you factually think that slavery or whatever word you'd use to refer to it is right?

>>162310

If murder is socially accepted. It means everyone suddenly has the capability to do it. That would make the world very dangerous. I could do it in that case. Things that aren't socially accepted are because most people can't do it.

>>162311

Of course I am right. Your point even supports me by calling it wage slavery. Something that is socially accepted is okay. There's no such thing as objective morality. It's just what most people are able to do at that moment. I have worked on my theory for months.

>>162306

I don't care about your justifications. All justifications are reasonable. I will never know your true justifications because words are limited, and there aren't enough words, or words of better quality to convey the truth. It requires the mental task of finding. It doesn't have to be found. I think words should be abandoned for more body language.

Stealing from anyone is immoral because most people can't do it. Even if they say they support your theft, they don't truly unless they do it with you or help you.

>thieves measure risk

Measuring risk when breaking a social rule is a gift. I am poor. I wish I could steal. You should accept we have very different brains. You should be happy you aren't the norm. We couldn't have the private property social construct if someone cloned you and built a civilization. That's okay, enjoy it. I really like peace and stability.

We need to get to 51 replies to match his kill count lolz. Once it reaches that please screenshot/screencap.

>>162311

Right vs wrong is a perspective thing and so is caalling youself some label like slave, gay, straight, white, black, when in reality all of that shit is fake.

>>162349

Not him, but: Murder already is another socially accepted thing and buzzword that has to do with perspective. We have soldiers and cops killing people all of the time as well as prison wardens and such killing inmaates. We even have citizens killing one another and we let them do it if we decide it was justified, but do you think the dead guy if alive would find it justified? We had the quick draw in the old west and plenty wish for it back as you having a gun puts the poower in your hands and takes it form the tyrannical police force that are currently above the law as they became too powerful. Absolute power corrupts absolutely.

>of course I am right

You got him mixed up with me and yeah, obejctively people like things like fairness, of which is why revolts against kingdoms happen. People bend the knee to tyranny to stay alive not because they like it. Normal people break the law all the time, like with copyright infringing for example or smoking weed or having sex wrong, anal being illegal or sex outside of wedlock or cheating, such things at one point or another were not socially acceptable and people did then anyway.

>words should be abandoned

At first they hate verbosity and say that the spirit of whit is brevity and now this? Humans cooperate and make a sociey due to complex language.

>society can't exist if it were comprised of like minded people

Suuuuure it couldn't. Niggers and their genetic diversity have created such WONDERFUL societies. Sure sure.

>peace

Never happened, only tyrannical regimes winning over another make us threatened by laws that cannot be undone during 'peace' of which was won through warring just so a wild pig can give you a ticket for not wearing your seat belt if your car is too new and other gay shit that didn't need to be policed. Stable? There's less and less money in our pockets but more and more in the rich man's that runs this shit and you think that it's stable?

>>162494

Power doesn't corrupt. You don't get power out of nowhere. People who want power get it. Murder is not socially acceptable. People who kill in any way are not normal people. Like I said, supporting a specific action is not true support. For something to be socially acceptable, everyone has to have the capability to do it. Revolutions are not done by normal people. Copyright infringement is socially acceptable and always has been. If you make it criminal like cp, people will be too afraid to download it. Having sex wrong depends on the location. Most people don't smoke weed in places where it is illegal, and it is not socially acceptable. Once it carries the high risk of a legal penalty, most people cannot do it and it becomes socially unacceptable. The not normal people at the top controls what is socially acceptable and so does the remaining capability of the people at the bottom.

>>162519

>Those murders are accepted

That's the path of least resistance. Anyone can celebrate a murder but not anyone can murder someone. Murder is extremely rare.

He was a loser