This proves that wolves cannot be the norm. Wolves should have no expectation of normality after proving to sheep that they have the ability to break the social contract when it suits them. Sheep love living with other sheep unconditionally. Other sheep provide love, warmth, and the shared assumption of safety.
When two wolves are together. They have to come up with shared rules, which they both eventually break out of their own selfishness. It's built on a lack of trust. When a wolf meets a sheep, they are taking advantage of the presumed from the sheep. Wolves know they are superior to sheep, and some wolves will do whatever it takes to exploit them when they feel think it is necessary.
Do wolves know that they are breaking the social contract, or do they think everyone thinks like them? Many sheep think wolf thinking is an error, when it is actually extremely advantageous. They see the true risk when they can instead of missing out on opportunities. When a wolf steals, do they say "Someone will take this anyway," or "I will be the first to take this." In a way, they show that they see the social contract as flexible and think everyone else does too or is too scared too, the outcome is the same regardless. That is something they share with sheep, thinking that everyone is like them. None of this contradicts my theory.
For those two wolves, their assumption is correct, and they have to actively compete for resources instead of cooperating like sheep. In some cases, wolves encourage other wolves to commit wolf acts. In most cases, wolf alliances break down quickly. Wolves know that the act isn't the problem, it's how the act appears. If the act attracts too much attention, they will get captured. If a wolf in a wolf alliance is captured, they will betray the other wolves, blame them, and tell the trusted wolves everything for it to work in their favor, or maintain their respect by not saying anything. This indicates they can handle the punishment, or are too afraid of destroying their social reputation.
The social contract becomes fragile only when wolves exist. They are a variation that only causes chaos and unfairness to everyone around them. They walk toward a perfect wall, and remove a brick because they thought it did not match their vision. When another wolf comes to remove a brick they felt did not match either, the wolves could not compromise. The sheep sit aside and do nothing. Wolves have the ability to resolve their own conflicts using methods sheep would never use unless with kin, like siblings fighting for resources. Which are low risk and socially accepted activities. It's not violence that is the problem, it's social acceptance, and if the majority is capable of doing it. Throwing a water ballon at kids on the bus is violence and assaultive, but because it's considered a "fun game" and socially loved. The sheep cooperate in the end. There are degrees of social acceptance. Empathy is triggered when an act interferes with survival and threatens cooperation. That's why sheep and most wolves can't murder. There's always a threshold.
Empathy stops a mother from murdering her kid, and so does the baby eye scheme. The scheme doesn't have much of an effect compared to empathy which blocks the action. If most mothers could easily murder their kid before they reproduce, that would violate the laws of nature. This leads to the assumption that all social rules weren't by wolves, but basic moral rules were actually made by sheep to condemn wolves who did what they couldn't do. Murder is wrong because sheep cannot do it. Empathy from this prevents a wolf with some of it, from murdering, or a lack of desire.
Sheep sometimes have a savior complex for wolves but it's usually sheep that wolves love living with the most. Wolves think sheep are superior to other wolves, but not superior to themselves. A wolf is more likely to think a sheep is stupid, but would still trust a sheep over a wolf. Wolves think sheep can't relate to them.
Captured wolves complain about hypervigilance when they are housed with other wolves. That proves their hypocrisy. They turn sheep hypervigilant, and sheep blame other sheep for being hurt by wolves. Despite the difference in abilities, wolves also blame other wolves. Other sheep complain when wolves get a taste of their own medicine.
