So I’m starting to think evolution was almost right. Animals don’t actually “evolve” however as much as their diet greatly impacts their development, to the point of becoming “new species” even, which are just mutations. I’ve seen several flowers develop into different types of plants as well as animals like bees. Insects, being so small, are the easiest to test this on and are clearly greatly affected. What makes flies different from pseudoflies might entirely be where they are born and what they have access to consume. Flowers tend to cross-pollinate to produce different mutations since they don’t directly consume much, however the intake of pollen is certainly a form of consumption.
Darwin was close, but he mixed his retarded theories with pseudoscience like the idea that because a rock is deep, it must be ten billion years old. He was also a victim of “textbook syndrome,” I call it, whole-heartedly believing every single thing you learn in third grade for fucking ever. Sorry but the third grade text book was fucking wrong about DNA, it’s a meaningless excretion that has nothing to do with prenatal development at all.
I expect humanity to take at least one to two hundred years to realize how fucking obvious this is, and how fucking stupid every other person in history has been.
This also means “extinct” species can be revived through introduction to the proper nutrients. Now, some asshat will say I JUST RUBBED FLIES IN SOME SHIT AND THEY DIDNT COME OUT ANY DIFFERENT HUHHHH the point being however this could be generational. A fly raised on consuming food will produce larva fit for consuming similar food, potentially.
