[ / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ random / cute / doomer / harmony / join / lewd / pone / turkchan ]

/random/ - random

shitpost central

Name
Email
Subject
REC
STOP
Comment *
File
Password (Randomized for file and post deletion; you may also set your own.)
Archive
* = required field[▶Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.
Embed
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Oekaki
Show oekaki applet
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Options
dicesidesmodifier

Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webp,webm, mp4, mov, swf, pdf
Max filesize is16 MB.
Max image dimensions are15000 x15000.
You may upload5 per post.


File: bf51dfdb16c723f⋯.png (233.3 KB,1016x364,254:91,dead.png)

 No.156110

>Within the next week, Congress is preparing to vote on the KIDS Act, a sprawling package of legislation that seeks to control Americans’ web browsing and private messaging. The package includes a revised version of the Kids Online Safety Act, or KOSA, combined with a collection of other internet bills, study bills, reporting requirements, and new regulations. Instead of debating any of these proposals on their merits, lawmakers are attempting to move them all at once under an ultra-expedited process. (voting on the 29th at 6:30pm)

>The package of cobbled-together bills is a mess, with different age-gating schemes for different services, using different standards. It’s a lot of complexity, and a lot of legal risk. Faced with that, many companies will conclude that the safest option is restrictive age-checking practices across their entire platforms.

>Buried inside the KIDS Act are provisions that will push online services to verify all users’ ages, require government-directed moderation policies for online speech, and even create new rules about private and encrypted communications. While supporters continue to claim this bill protects minors online, its requirements come at the expense of privacy, free expression, and the ability of people of all ages to use the internet without revealing sensitive data.

https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2026/06/kids-act-would-require-age-checks-get-online

most of the republicans and democrats are in favor for this bullshit.

____________________________
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.156114

so I am guessing this act is designed to curtail the spread of CSAM online?

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.156116

>>156114

You are crazy as shit and your false sense of morality will never surpass God's will.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.156117

>>156116

CSAM is mostly on the surface web these days, relatively few people are using the deep/dark web to access it. I say 85% to 90% of CSAM is circulating on the surface web in 2026. Almost nobody uses Tor to access porn. Most of the illegal images and videos are being traded on Telegram, Discord, TikTok and other surface web platforms.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.156120

File: 5ca1c5562a881c7⋯.png (385.31 KB,1280x1280,1:1,IMG_4064.png)

I never thought I would live long enough to see the internet become illegal

There are about to be people literally put in prison for accessing the internet. Think about that a bit

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.156127

>>156117

Go fucking die you federal agent

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.156128

>>156117

CSAM? No, it's called kiddie porn, asshole, and jusy because it exists doesn't mean you get to take our rights away. Fuck you, piece of shit!

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.156129

>CSAM

LOL these cucked spineless faggots literally think that kiddie porn is like some sort of radioactive material LMAO. I would feel sorry for them if they weren't so evil and malicious. Can you believe these people attempt to elevate looking at a picture of a 16 year old's titties are crime rivaling or surpassing murder? Holy shit, no wonder they call it clown world!

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.



[Return][Go to top][Catalog][Nerve Center][Random][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[]
[ / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ random / cute / doomer / harmony / join / lewd / pone / turkchan ]