>>138619
This thought has also struck me from time to time. How can there be so many sites with hardly any users? Chan sites are reasonably well known, require such little effort to post on with zero commitment and yet, hardly any posters.
I guess it would support the idea that 99.9% of people are essentially crammed into the same few mainstream internet sites and hardly anyone moves outside into the deadzone but still, it just seems eerie and strange that perfectly functional sites that do have some users essentially are used by under 100 or under 50 people on a monthly basis when you think about how many people there are in the world and on the internet. They could be here with a few clicks and yet, empty.
Makes me existential and conspiratorial.