/qresearch/ - Q Research

>>9999604

Q4590

>>9999731

>Full cap of link. There is a 49-second video at link.

correction - video at link is 59-seconds

>>9999781

>Kevin Spacey 'KTWK'

Video as posted to Spacey's YouTube

>>9999814

>MP4 of Video at link

Archive of line

>>9999653

>connecticut-satanic-desecration-marks-11th-attack-christian-church/

>5:5?

10 Cities And Towns With Connections To Satanism

Turin, Italy - Bolsover, England - Amityville, New York - Fort Thomas, Kentucky - St. James, New York - Victoria, British Columbia - Toledo, Ohio - San Francisco, California - Pergamon, Ancient Greece - Lalish, Iraq

https://listverse.com/2016/01/28/10-cities-and-towns-with-connections-to-satanism/

>>9999746

Connecticut Witchcraft Trials

Everyone knows about the infamous Salem witch trials, but few people realize that Connecticut has an older and arguably more colorful history when it comes to accusations of—and executions for—witchcraft.

Actually, by 1692, when hysteria was just starting to sweep through Salem, nine (or eleven, reports aren’t exactly clear) unfortunate souls had already been executed for witchcraft in Connecticut, including Alse (or Alice) Young, who was the first woman hanged in New England—and possibly the New World—for purportedly having consorted with Satan. Before it was over, 35 people would stand accused of crimes involving witchcraft.

As hard as it is to conceive now, the idea of The Devil walking the Earth and taking an active role in everyday life was a genuine fear in Colonial Connecticut—it’s not a coincidence that there are over 30 places in the state with names that served as a warning to all that The Evil One might be lurking about, including Devil’s Den (five different places), Devil’s Backbone (four), Satan’s Kingdom (two), Devil’s Island, Hell’s Hollow, Tophet Ravine and even a Devil’s Dripping Pan. The early European settlers here were true believers.

The best-researched record of events is John M. Taylor’s The Witchcraft Delusion in Colonial Connecticut (1647-1697), in which he chronicles the known events as well as delves into the causes for the hysteria, including tracing the entire history of witchcraft.

During those times, what is now Connecticut was then divided into two colonies: Connecticut and New Haven. Witchcraft officially became a crime in Connecticut in 1642: “If any man or woman be a witch—that is, hath or consulteth with a familiar spirit—they shall be put to death.” New Haven enacted its witchcraft law in 1655: “If any person be a witch, he or she shall be put to death according to” Exodus xxii, 18; Leviticus xx, 27; Deuteronomy xviii, 10, 11.

In the book, Taylor also uncovers Connecticut’s official “Grounds for Examination of a Witch,” written in the 17th century. [Note: I’ve updated some spelling for easier reading.]

1. Notorious defamation by ye common report of the people a ground of suspicion.

2. Second ground for strict examination is if a fellow witch gave testimony on his examination or death yet such a person is a witch, but this is not sufficient for conviction or condemnation.

3. If after cursing, there follow death or at least mischief to ye party.

4. If after quarreling or threatening a present mischief doth follow for party’s devilishly disposed after cursing does use threatenings, and yet also is a great presumption against ye.

5. If ye party suspected to be ye son or daughter, the servant of familiar friend, near neighbors or old companion of a known or convicted witch this also is a presumption, for witchcraft is an art yet may be learned and conveyed from man to man and often it falleth out yet a witch dying leaveth some of ye aforced heirs of her witchcraft.

6. If ye party suspected have ye devil’s mark for this thought when ye devil maketh his convent with ye he always leaves his mark behind him to know ye for his own yet is, if not evident reason in can be given for such mark.

7. Lastly if ye party examined be unconstant and contrary to himself in his answers.

Thus much for examination which is usually by question and some times by torture upon strong and great presumption.

For conviction it must be grounded on just and sufficient proofs. The proofs for conviction of two sorts, one. Some be less sufficient, some more sufficient.

It then goes on to talk about how in earlier times, red-hot irons and scalding water were used for tests, as was binding the accused and throwing them into water to see if they sank or not. (If they did, they were proclaimed “innocent,” although there was also a good chance they drowned—not much of a “victory.”) Also discussed are other tell-tale signs of witchcraft, such as a familiar (in the form of a mouse or cat) hanging about, or Devil’s marks on the body.

http://www.damnedct.com/connecticut-witchcraft-trials/

>>9999917

Hopefully, HUSSEIN's is in the shitter.

>>9999903

Anon - if this doesn't make this bread notable, please re-post next bread so I can re-nominate.

>>9999914

a baker said he picked up

here for bu if needed

i guess the message is….we are going to have to clean this up ourselves because we are just shown things to make one demand action being taken and yet nothing continues to happen ;

>>9999924

You'll dance for shillings and like it, Liz

>>9999934

>Connecticut Witchcraft Trials

cont

When it came to means of execution, almost all of alleged witches were hanged—contrary to popular imagery, no witch was ever burned at the stake in Connecticut.

Here is a list of those accused of witchcraft in Connecticut. [Note: This is a work in progress, so there will be additions and modifications as we continue our research. The names with hyperlinks offer more info, and our plan is to eventually have them all. Thanks for understanding]

Alse (Alice) Young – 1647

Mary Johnson – 1648

John & Joan Carrington – 1650

Goody Bassett – 1651

Goody Knapp – 1653

Elizabeth Godman – 1653 & 1655

Lydia Gilbert – 1654

Nicholas & Goody Bayley – 1655

William Meaker – 1657

Elizabeth Garlick – 1658

Nicholas & Margaret Jennings – 1661

Judith Varlett – 1662

Katherine Palmer – 1662

Goody Ayres – 1662

Rebecca & Nathaniel Greensmith – 1662

Mary Sanford – 1662

Andrew Sanford – 1662

Mary Barnes – 1662

Elizabeth & John Blackleach – 1662

James Wakeley – 1662

Ralph & Mary Hall – 1664

Elizabeth Seager – 1666

Hannah Griswold – 1667

William Graves – 1667

Katherine Harrison – 1669

Goody Messenger – 1673

Goody Burr – 1678

Goody Bowden – 1689

Mercy Disborough – 1692

Elizabeth Clawson – 1692

Mary Staples – 1692

Mary Harvey – 1692

Hannah Harvey – 1692

Goody Miller – 1692

Winifred Benham – 1692

Hugh Croasia – 1692

Winifred Benham, Jr. & Sr. – 1697

Sarah Spencer – 1724

For the record, in December 2006, the State of Connecticut officially pardoned all those accused of witchcraft, forever clearing their names.

endx

>>9999616

that 5 in the end

>>9999653

Q

Covid 19 is disproportionaly affecting christian people.

Christians 25% +/- of World Pop

And 50%++ of Covid Deaths

outside the random standard deviations.

Religious/Cultural extermination?

>>9999917

Schiff family name linked to McKinley in wiki bio.

the last two posts will be 9999999 and 10000000 and they will both be Q!

(a prediction)

fill

>>9999938

All the way back to the Tower of Babel.

>>9999883

<7:06 pm is 6:66 pm

<twitter link

fuck off boomer

>>9999921

EmergencyWARPowers

https://www.azleg.gov/ars/36/00788.htm

https://azleg.gov/ars/26/00303.htm

here comes the 9s………

>>9999604

plane as day to many, but not enough based on their willingness to 'obey' the State Governors that knowingly sent infected CV patients to kill Grandma and Grandpa!

>>9999940

It’s not a literal movie.

>>9999604

Ummm yes we know. At what point does it become painfully obvious to those in high level positions of Justice and Enforcement the "elite" never pay.

>>9999604

So far, Q, the kid who accused Spaceyon Nantucket island was spared from death by Kevin Spacey. His mother is a former Boston news anchor named Heather Unruh. She's obviously part of the mockingbird media crowd. Why was her son's life spared? Is it because they pretended to be evidence in the case in Massachusetts? Will that boy be killed?

fill #2

kek

Congratulations!

Digital Warriors.

Bread is wonky

and there is NO NEW BAKE yet

Will stand by to bake if needed

(if i can)

>>9999800

Ad hominem attack. With a straw scarecrow thing too. Try harder. And don’t dodge the fucking questions ASS HOLE.

Is Kevin Spacey a Jew?

>>9999984

Son of a Nazi

>>9999982

https://8kun.top/qresearch/res/9999948.html

>>9999966

has to be

>>9999299

The trips to Antarctica are a distraction

You are not supposed to ask the question

How does someone get to Antarctica?

And the OTHER question.

Does anyone famous ever really travel alone?

The answer to the first is simple.

First you go to Argentina or New Zealand or Australia

From there the celebrity can travel to Australia with a few people from their entourage

Which answers the second one

Celebrities always travel with an entourage

And nobody ever counts the size of it

Or checks what they are doing.

And entourage includes an advance party

Which might spend months ahead of time doing something

Or other.

So let me ask you a question?

If lots of celebrities wanted to build underground bunkers in the Southern Hemisphere

And wanted to check out the sites, choose one,

sign contracts, check the quality of the build…

Then how would they hide the fact that they are doing this?

Especially if their public role means that they can't drop the slightest hint they are preparing to RUN AWAY FROM THE USA?

Is the picture coming clearer?

In the religion of Thelema, which was given to Aleister Crowley by demons who he channeled,

All followers are encouraged to communicate directly with spirits.

What if the demons told them to prepare for a major impact to earth from an asteroid sized object coming in from outside the solar system?

What if the demon told them that those who hide underground in the south,

Like MEEK LITTLE MICE

WILL INHERIT THE EARTH

After the dust settles?

Now ask yourself, why is Russia building so many new space launch facilities?

Why is Trump doing the same?

Could a fleet of rockets be capable of diverting such an asteroid?