/qresearch/ -  Q Research

Magic Grandpa's New Party Implodes

WE GOT A PROBLEM

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rBba5fGLpz8

Hold The Line Anons!

Barrister Barrett explains what to do if the Police Knock on your door

Steven Barrett - Barrister

21 Sept 2025

Our Police are completely broken. Instead of policing crimes, they are policing hurt feelings on social media. Until we fix our country - how do we respond? This video sets out what to do.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vlT-O1q2UmU

>>23658275

NO TO DIGITAL I.D TICKER AND INTERACTIVE MAP

Note: anons can pass this link around, show it to others, especially those who use their mobiles for everything.

=

🔴 LIVE | 'No' to Digital ID Cards—watch this UK petition soar past 1 million signatures, 2 mil next

https://youtu.be/Qlow1fzHLJ8

-

Petition

https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/730194

–

Do not introduce Digital ID cards

We demand that the UK Government immediately commits to not introducing a digital ID cards. There are reports that this is being looked at.

More details

We think this would be a step towards mass surveillance and digital control, and that no one should be forced to register with a state-controlled ID system. We oppose the creation of any national ID system.

ID cards were scrapped in 2010, in our view for good reason.

Sign this petition

1,743,950 signatures

MONOLOGUE: What has Gayatri's fingernail got to do with terrorism?

George Galloway

28 Sept 2025 #MOATS #TerrorismAct #Gatwick

The inside story from inside the locked room of the Galloways Gatwick arrests, although the police like to call it detention. From the absurd to the ridiculous, but with criminal consequences

Follow #MOATS 486 #TerrorismAct #Gatwick #TerrorismPolice #MagnaCarta

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jIDTEd6r5yg

Can SKS strip out the ads and repost here so that it's playable?

https://youtu.be/A7SdvYz-z2s

Monkey Werx US October Surprise? https://youtu.be/y3ajDPCL9pI

This SITREP covers recent reports regarding legal procedures and ongoing investigations involving Donald Trump and his document handling. We examine the political implications and potential legal matters arising from these cases.

Rule, Britannia British Bulldog Records

Military Roundtable 2 months ago discusses military justice of entire Obama admin & open warfare in US cities

Can't find way to upload this next one. Starts with interesting comments on UK situation.

Host John Michael Chambers is joined by retired Australian Special Forces Lieutenant Colonel Riccardo Bosi for a deep dive into the strategic undercurrents of a world in transition.

https://johnmichaelchambers.com/wp-content/uploads/Bosi_9_29_25.mp4

Gollum? Satan?

So does any1 understand the title of the bread?

> Bring Back Boudica

Glad the shills of London pics are gone.

Phsyop read n learn.

Well FYI on Boudicca. The only credible historical notation we have about Boudicca was from Tacitus, the Roman historian, in his ‘Annals of Rome’. He finished his annals within about a generation after the execution of Christ. Who he also wrote about, by the way.

Tacitus said only that Boudicca was an iceni queen whose husband was killed by, and she and her daughter raped by the Romans. That she put her daughter in her chariot and road up and down in front of the iceni , shaming them to fight.

And they fought. She didn’t.

100 years later, Cassio dio also writes if Boudicca, but boy does he embellish Tacitus’ story.

Cassio calls her the epitome of beauty, that she tortured Roman soldiers, and gives her a very long and flowering speech when she drove her chariot shaming the iceni men to fight. But he doesn’t say she fought either.

Thats it.

Those are the only two pieces anywhere in all of history about Boudicca. Nothing else exists.

What you’ve been fed is the feminist (commie) rewrite.

Can your wife or girlfriend overpower you? Can the strongest female kickboxer beat the strongest man? There’s no doubt she had spirit and rage and spurred the iceni men on to battle. And she was inspiring, but she didn’t fight. She got raped by a Roman man, who was obviously, from the outcome, a lot stronger than she was.

>>23762342

>Tacitus said only that Boudicca was an iceni queen whose husband was killed by, and she and her daughter raped by the Romans

Tacitus

Tacitus said Prasutagus died peacefully

>Can the strongest female kickboxer beat the strongest man?

Wasn't kickboxing, was swords and spears

>She got raped by a Roman man

Only one, you sure?

>>23800998 Emergency 999 trips

UK To Remove Andrew From Role As Royal Navy Vice Admiral

by William Schomberg Reuters November 2, 2025

LONDON, Nov 2 (Reuters) – Britain’s former prince Andrew is due to be stripped of his last remaining military position as part of King Charles’ decision to remove his brother from public life, the defense minister said on Sunday.

John Healey told BBC television that moves were underway to take away Andrew’s position as a vice admiral in the British navy and that Charles had “indicated that’s what he wishes.”

The king last week stripped his younger brother of his title of prince and evicted him from his mansion in a bid to prevent further damage to the royal family’s reputation over Andrew’s ties to the late sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.

“This is a move that’s right, it’s a move the king has indicated we should take and we’re working on that at the moment,” Healey said.

Andrew kept his rank as a vice admiral in 2022 when he gave up his other military positions.

https://gcaptain.com/uk-to-remove-andrew-from-role-as-royal-navy-vice-admiral/

>>23800998

UK is hogtied - deliberately. Problem described here

You broke German Enigma. Now German forces under the color of a False Flag have invaded Your Very Country, attacking your very citizens On Your Streets. And your response is “Not to Jump to Conclusions.”

Weak

Shizzle

>>23808334

load up the guatemalan characters here make my day

Greta

>>23794998

>tell U.S. bout duh lambs clarice

>>23752260

^^^^^^^^^^^^

Kek. A dope who obviously doesn’t read and skipped one too many classes in grade school, who should know basic British history, can’t Goggle Baodica, telling anons to read.

>>23821797

He doesn't seem to know Time Team did an episode on the Roman settlement in the Iceni territory and there was IIRC an episode of Unearthed History where they went to find the site of the last battle between the Iceni and the Romans

BritFags are pulling people over for mobile phone use. But if they’re stabbing/raping your teenage daughter, that’s ok.

UK Lobbying Poland to Buy Swedish Submarines, Sources Say

By Barbara Erling Reuters November 14, 2025

WARSAW, Nov 14 (Reuters) – British Prime Minister Keir Starmer is lobbying Poland to award a multi-billion-euro submarine purchase contract to Swedish defence group Saab SAABb.ST that may include some deals with UK defence group Babcock BAB.L, sources said.

Babcock declined to comment on its possible involvement in the bid.

A British government spokesperson did not comment directly on the report, but said warship and fighter jet export deals were bringing billions of pounds to the UK economy.

“We are making defence an engine for growth – delivering jobs and boosting the UK economy whilst strengthening our commitment to NATO allies and European security,” the spokesperson said in a statement.

A spokesperson for Saab told Reuters on Friday that the company’s submarines are tailored to the specific conditions prevailing in the Baltic Sea, but referred any questions about the UK’s position to the British authorities.

Polish officials have said a decision on the “Orka” programme, a key part of Warsaw’s drive to modernise its navy and bolster NATO ties as tensions with Russia escalate, could be taken within weeks.

Saab, which makes a wide range of military equipment including fighter jets, surveillance systems, missiles and submarines, is among a handful of short-listed contenders for the contract, along with manufacturers from Italy, Spain, France, Germany and South Korea.

Two officials close to the matter told Reuters that Starmer had signed a letter of support, together with Swedish Prime Minister Ulf Kristersson, which was included in Saab’s final offer, submitted in late October.

POLITICAL JOCKEYING

Starmer is keen to boost the British economy, but his involvement is also an example of political jockeying around Europe for a slice of lucrative defence contracts as countries increase military spending in the face of tensions with Russia.

“The UK’s Babcock, among other British partners, will participate in Sweden’s bid,” one of the sources said, requesting anonymity because he was not authorised to speak to the media.

Starmer and Kristersson said in their joint letter they were confident that the Swedish proposal would boost security in the Baltic Sea, according to an official who has seen the document.

Polish media have reported that the offers from Germany, Italy and Sweden are frontrunners in the multi-billion-dollar programme. All three countries are partners of Poland in NATO and the European Union.

https://gcaptain.com/uk-lobbying-poland-to-buy-swedish-submarines-sources-say/

Canada #85

George Soros Was Funding Far Left Censorship Group that Attacked The Gateway Pundit in British Parliament – Bragged About Targeting TGP Advertisers

by Jim Hoft Nov. 19, 2025

The Free Beacon released a report on the far-left censorship group, the Center for Countering Digital Hate (CCDH), and its funders.

According to the Free Beacon, George Soros and his Open Society Foundations donated $250,000 to the CCDH for their work in silencing conservative media outlets like The Gateway Pundit, The Federalist, The Daily Wire, Zero Hedge, and others.

The Free Beacon reported that the grant provided “general support” to the British nonprofit, which works to pressure social media companies, advertisers, and investors into censoring content it deems “hate” or “disinformation.”

Former Labour Party operative Imran Ahmed founded the organization. How his background as a far left political operative prepared Ahmed to define himself as an expert in disinformation is unclear.

As The Gateway Pundit reported earlier, the CCDH published a report titled, Defund Racism: Black Lives Matter was used to urge advertisers to blacklist The Gateway Pundit and other conservative websites from mainstream advertisers.

The Center of for Countering Digital Hate used this as an excuse to include The Gateway Pundit on their list of racist websites.

They included TGP because we reported on the insanity of the FBI labeling white supremacists the country’s number one threat when Black Lives Matter-Antifa just destroyed $2 billion in private property in their violent attacks on American cities.

This was not the first time the Center for Countering Digital Hate had targeted The Gateway Pundit.

Internet sleuth Bad Kitty Unleashed released an explosive report recently on how the Center for Countering Digital Hate partnered with the US taxpayer-funded Restless Development organization to counter, blacklist, censor and silence Covid “disinformation” in 2021 and beyond.

Imran Awan, the CEO at The Center for Countering Digital Hate (CCDH), bragged about getting conservative news orgs such as the Gateway Pundit, the Federalist, and Zero Hedge reported to social media AND demonetized! Especially from Google Ads, a prominent advertiser online.

Imran Ahmed bragged during testimony in front of the UK Parliament that his group had successfully spurred Google to stop monetizing The Gateway Pundit!

Imran said this during testimony before the UK Parliament in September 2021, when he bragged about working for over a year to push Google to demonetize The Gateway Pundit.

More (including donor lists):

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2025/11/george-soros-was-funding-far-left-censorship-group/

Canada #85

Newly-Leaked Emails Expose A Legitimate LGBTQ Mafia Presence At The BBC

Authored by Olivia Murray via AmericanThinker.com Wednesday, Nov 19, 2025

If we’re lucky, the BBC may soon cease to exist.

As you may have already heard, President Trump’s threat to sue the outlet for an edited speech that was grotesquely distorted and then aired in a documentary has increased from $1 billion to $5 billion—in the wake of Trump’s threat, BBC released a statement that admitted to a “regretful” editing job, but denied any wrongdoing. However…The Telegraph kind of blew that claim up, reminding us that in 2022, the BBC also aired a similarly-edited version of the same speech on its Newsnight program:

Spliced footage of the speech, which aired in an episode in 2022, made it appear that Mr Trump was encouraging his supporters to riot.

The edit was similar to a version aired in a Panorama documentary broadcast last year.

What a doozy, because as James Zumwalt wrote today, I don’t think the BBC is going to win this one. Seems like this should be understood for a global media company, but if you create a new video product by cutting and splicing, which yields a conflation of separate remarks to push a narrative that doesn’t exist, and then you air that manufactured footage to millions(?) of people, I’d argue that’s basically the definition of libelous and defamatory action.

While the BBC swears there’s no “pattern” of wrongdoing, a new report from the New York Post suggests otherwise. According to newly-leaked emails,

Female staff at the BBC complained to editors for years that the publicly-funded British broadcaster had been hijacked by the ‘trans’ agenda, newly-leaked emails dating back to 2020 show.

In the emails, female staff complained that biologically male transgender sex offenders were being referred to in stories as women, and that articles were avoiding the use of the words ‘girls’ and ‘women’ when discussing topics such as menstruation and birth control….

Of course, this is expected for a leftwing outlet with an obvious agenda, but it gets a little worse: the company appears to have invited in a legitimate LGBTQ mafia presence:

An internal memo revealed that all trans stories were subject to ‘effective censorship’ by specialist LGBTQ reporters hired as gatekeepers at the BBC, who refused to cover gender-critical stories.

And, per the women who worked at the BBC, the LGBTQ “specialists” would bully wayward journalists, punishing dissent, and creating a “culture of fear” in the office:

The women also described a culture of fear at the BBC, where even veteran reporters didn’t dare to stray from the position on trans issues, lest they be branded ‘transphobic,’ the Times reported.

[snip]

‘Any questioning or insufficiently enthusiastic championing risked being labeled as bigoted … It felt like activism, not news,’ one BBC staffer told the Sunday Times.

The BBC was reportedly not interested in any story that was “critical” of the LGBTQ movement, no matter how newsworthy. A new exposé about “hormone blockers” being used on small children? Not to be reported on. A story about a cross-dressing man assaulting women in his prison unit? Obviously he must be called a woman.

Now, the BBC, being publicly-funded, has an in with Britain’s education system:

Trump’s lawsuit could bring down the whole house of cards. Godspeed.

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/newly-leaked-emails-expose-legitimate-lgbtq-mafia-presence-bbc

Archbishop Vigano - free Reiner Fuellmich

Royal Navy Shadows Russian Warships Through English Channel as Maritime Tensions Escalate

Mike Schuler November 23, 2025

Britain’s Royal Navy intercepted two Russian warships transiting the English Channel over the past two weeks in round-the-clock shadowing operations, the Ministry of Defence announced, marking the latest incident in escalating maritime tensions between Britain and Russia.

British media is reporting HMS Severn tracked the RFN Stoikiy, a Russian corvette, and the Yelnya, a replenishment oiler, as they sailed west through the Dover Strait into the English Channel before transferring monitoring duties to a NATO ally off the coast of Brittany in northwest France. The British patrol ship continued to observe from a distance and remained ready to respond to any unexpected activity.

The interception comes against a backdrop of heightened tensions following an incident involving the Russian spy ship Yantar, which allegedly directed lasers at RAF pilots monitoring the vessel. On November 19, British Defence Secretary John Healey warned that “military options” were prepared should the intelligence-gathering ship become a threat.

“This is the first time we’ve had this action from Yantar directed against the British RAF. We take it extremely seriously,” Healey said. He characterized the laser targeting as “deeply dangerous” and indicated Britain was prepared to react based on the vessel’s movements.

In response to the incident, Healey announced operational changes to enhance monitoring capabilities. “I have changed the navy’s rules of engagement so that we can follow more closely, monitor more closely, the activities of the Yantar when it’s in our wider waters,” he stated.

The Ministry of Defence emphasized that UK armed forces remain on patrol “from the English Channel to the High North” amid increased Russian activity threatening UK waters.

Missions to monitor Russian vessels and submarines have become more frequent since Russia invaded Ukraine in 2022, with Britain’s Royal Navy and Royal Air Force routinely shadowing potential threats to national security.

https://gcaptain.com/royal-navy-shadows-russian-warships-through-english-channel-as-maritime-tensions-escalate/

Royal Navy's Bahrain-Based Frigate Slinks Away Silently

Published Nov 18, 2025 1:02 PM by The Maritime Executive

Without any announcement, and with a dearth of official information concerning its whereabouts, the Royal Navy appears to have withdrawn its permanently deployed frigate in the Gulf, HMS Lancaster (F229).

The last public appearance of HMS Lancaster (F229), a Type 23 frigate, was when carrying out yet another successful drug smuggling interdiction in the Gulf of Oman on October 12. A Royal Marine sniper on board HMS Lancaster's Wildcat helicopter disabled the motor of a skiff travelling at 40 knots, and the ship's crew was then able to recover heroin, crystal meth, and hashish worth $45 million. Since then, HMS Lancaster has not been sighted, and the only vessel alongside at the HMS Juffair base in Bahrain has been the Hunt-class minesweeper HMS Middleton (M34), which, with its trusty 30mm cannon, is now the Royal Navy's Middle East flagship.

HMS Lancaster is likely to be returning to the United Kingdom, in company for logistic support with RFA Tidespring (A136). Tidespring was last spotted in Cape Town on November 12, and although HMS Lancaster was not seen alongside, both vessels are likely to be back in the UK at the beginning of December, possibly joining up with the HMS Prince of Wales (R09) carrier strike group as it too returns home after its deployment to the Far East.

The Royal Navy has not announced whether HMS Lancaster is to be replaced, either in the short term by one of the two offshore patrol boats, HMS Tamar (P233) and HMS Spey (P234), based in Singapore, or in the longer term by one of the Type 31 frigates yet to be launched.

In the meantime, with the internal security situation in Iran deteriorating and tensions rising, the Royal Navy's presence in the region will be maintained by HMS Middleton. Once one of three vessels in the 9th Mine Counter Measures Squadron, Middleton provides a base afloat for a valuable mine counter-measures capability should trouble arise in the Straits of Hormuz area, as tends to occur when Iran goes through a period of tension.

The Royal Navy is currently suffering significant shortages, caused by shortages of budget, manpower, and replacements for obsolescent ships, and has been reluctant to acknowledge that these are affecting operational requirements.

Of six Type 45 destroyers, only two are operational - HMS Dauntless (D33) and HMS Dragon (D35), with HMS Daring (D32) returning to service after a refit lasting over 3,000 days. Of the eight remaining Type 23 frigates, HMS Richmond (F239) and HMS Somerset (F82) are active, with HMS Lancaster (F229) on its way home to be retired shortly. The Type 23s are being replaced by Type 31s, with HMS Venturer due in service by 2027, and by Type 26s, with HMS Glasgow due in service in 2028.

The Royal Navy now appears to be without its amphibious warfare capability entirely. All three Royal Fleet Auxiliary Bay Class amphibious warfare vessels are inactive, for manpower or budgetary reasons: RFA Lyme Bay (L3007), RFA Mounts Bay (L3008), and RFA Cardigan Bay (L3009). Albion Class assault ships HMS Albion (L14) and HMS Bulwark (L15) are being decommissioned, and the hospital ship RFA Argus (A135) has been condemned as being insufficiently seaworthy to prevent even a move from its berth in the Portsmouth Naval Base.

Without RFA Fort Victoria (A387), the fleet does not have a single vessel able to supply ammunition and food at sea. On its Far East cruise, HMS Prince of Wales (R09) was dependent for such support on the Norwegian logistics vessel HNoMS Maud (A530).

The submarine service is also under pressure. Cruises by the Dreadnought Class nuclear ballistic missile submarines, one of which is always on patrol, are having to be extended to record durations because of the lack of serviceable boats to maintain the rotation. Of the seven Astute Class nuclear attack submarines, two are still to enter service, and none of the five active boats are currently believed to be operational. The HMS Prince of Wales carrier strike group is believed to have been deployed without a submarine escort, contrary to standard practice.

Faced by these issues, the response of the UK's Ministry of Defence has been to highlight what the future procurement program will deliver, without acknowledging that short-term problems exist. There has, however, been no significant uplift to the defense budget in the interim, which is at the heart of the operational issues facing the Royal Navy.

https://maritime-executive.com/article/royal-navy-s-bahrain-based-frigate-slinks-back-home-silently

Canada #85

They've Learned Nothing… Because That Would Expose Too MuchPart One

Authored by Roger Bate via The Brownstone Institute Tuesday, Nov 25, 2025 - 05:00 AM

The UK Covid-19 Inquiry has finally released the core political chapters of its long-awaited report. After nearly three years of hearings, millions of documents, and tens of millions of pounds spent on legal fees, the conclusion is now unmistakably clear.

They’ve learned nothing, as I detail in my latest research.

Worse, they may not want to learn.

The Inquiry’s structure, its analytical frame, even its carefully curated narrative all point in the same direction: away from the possibility that Britain’s pandemic response was fundamentally misguided, and toward the politically safer claim that ministers simply “acted too late.”

On November 20, 2025, Jay Bhattacharya captured this perfectly in a single sentence on X: “Fact check; not locking down at all (like Sweden) would have saved lives in UK. Hard to believe how much money the UK spent on its sham covid inquiry.” That tweet was provocative—but it was also accurate in its diagnosis of the Inquiry’s deeper pathologies.

The Inquiry’s Central Mistake: Asking the Wrong Question

From the outset, the Inquiry has framed Britain’s pandemic response as a timing problem. Lockdowns were assumed to be necessary and effective; the only question was whether politicians implemented them quickly enough. The result is a dry recitation of process failures and personality clashes inside Downing Street, all of which are said to have delayed the inevitable “stay-at-home” order.

But that framing was never neutral. It was baked into the Inquiry’s analytical choices—especially its uncritical reliance on the same family of models that drove the UK into lockdown in March 2020.

The centerpiece of that modeling tradition is Imperial College London’s Report 9, the document that forecast hundreds of thousands of UK deaths absent stringent lockdowns. That report assumed near-homogeneous mixing, limited voluntary behavior change, and high fatality rates across the population. Under those assumptions, lockdown becomes not a political choice but a mathematical necessity.

The Inquiry has now rerun the same machinery and, unsurprisingly, produced the same conclusion.

Its headline claim—that delaying lockdown by a week caused roughly 23,000 additional deaths—is not a historical finding. It is not based on observational data. It is simply the output of an Imperial-style model with a different start date.

The Inquiry has restated the model, not tested it.

The Evidence They Chose Not to See

The Inquiry’s blindness becomes fully apparent when we ask the obvious comparative question: if the lockdown paradigm were correct, what would we expect to see among countries that refused to lock down?

We would expect chaos. We would expect mass hospital collapse. We would expect mortality catastrophes to dwarf the UK.

We would expect, in short, to see Sweden in ruins.

Instead, we see the opposite.

Sweden kept primary schools open, avoided stay-at-home orders, relied heavily on voluntary behavior, and preserved civil liberties throughout the pandemic. After correcting early care-home errors, Sweden recorded one of the lowest age-adjusted excess mortality rates in Europe.

The Swedish experience is not a footnote. It is not an “exception.” It is the control case—the real-world test of the lockdown paradigm.

And it falsifies it.

A serious Inquiry would have begun with Sweden. It would have asked why a country that rejected lockdowns achieved better mortality outcomes than Britain while preserving education, normal life, and basic freedoms. It would have integrated that evidence into every chapter. It would have examined whether voluntary behavior changes, targeted protection, and risk-based messaging can substitute for mass coercion.

Instead, Sweden is barely mentioned. When it appears at all, it is described as an anomaly. The Inquiry behaves as though Sweden is politically inconvenient—not analytically essential.

Because it is.

They've Learned Nothing… Because That Would Expose Too MuchPart Two

The Modeling Was Wrong. The Inquiry Can’t Admit It.

If the Inquiry were genuinely interested in learning, it would examine whether the models that drove the UK’s response were flawed. It would review the assumptions underpinning Report 9. It would test them against real-world data from multiple countries. It would commission adversarial modeling groups. It would bring in critics. It would examine alternative frameworks.

It did none of these things.

The behavior of the public is a perfect example. Imperial-style models assume that people remain near-normal in their social contacts without legal mandates. But mobility data, workplace activity, and school attendance show that Britons began adjusting their behavior weeks before Boris Johnson held the lockdown press conference. High-risk individuals adapted earliest. Businesses reacted to perceived risks earlier than the state. Families responded faster than the Cabinet Office.

The models were wrong about behavior.

Yet the Inquiry’s analysis still treats people as if they only respond to orders, not information.

The result is a fantasy counterfactual: a Britain that would have carried on as normal in March 2020 had the government not intervened. That Britain never existed.

Where Is the Cost–Benefit Analysis?

The Inquiry promised to evaluate the “relative benefits and disbenefits” of non-pharmaceutical interventions. It has not done so. There is no integrated accounting of:

the millions of missed cancer screenings

the explosion in mental-health morbidity

the delayed cardiovascular care

the long-term educational loss from school closures

the widening inequality gaps

the years-long damage to the NHS backlog

the economic scarring that will shorten future lives

Lockdowns always look good when you only count Covid deaths. But public health is cumulative. It is intertemporal. Saving a life today by destroying ten years of someone’s earning power is not a victory.

The Inquiry refuses to engage with these trade-offs. It is easier to condemn “late lockdowns” than to ask whether lockdowns were the wrong tool altogether.

The Real Reason the Inquiry Learned Nothing

The central failure of the UK Covid-19 Inquiry is not analytical. It is institutional.

A real investigation would expose catastrophic judgment errors across the political and scientific establishment. It would show that ministers outsourced strategy to a narrow modeling group. It would reveal that the harms of lockdowns were not only foreseeable but foreseen. It would vindicate critics who were ridiculed or censored. It would anger parents whose children suffered educational harm. It would enrage families whose loved ones died because routine care was suspended. It would shatter public trust in Whitehall and SAGE.

That is precisely what the Inquiry cannot do.

Instead, it offers a politically safe narrative. The strategy was sound. The problem was timing. Ministers were slow. Advisors were frustrated. Downing Street was chaotic. But the solution next time is simple: lock down earlier, lock down harder, lock down smarter.

It is a comforting fairy tale for the people who caused the damage.

The Truth Is Already Clear

Bhattacharya’s November 2025 tweet may have been blunt, but it crystallized what the Inquiry is unwilling to say. Sweden shows that not locking down at all could have saved British lives—not merely reduced collateral damage, but saved lives.

That is the final heresy. And that is why the Inquiry cannot confront it.

Learning would expose too much.

The UK did not simply lock down too late. It locked down unnecessarily. The Inquiry should have been a reckoning. Instead, it became a shield—protecting institutions rather than illuminating truth.

Britain deserved better. The world deserved better.

Until we admit what went wrong, we remain doomed to repeat it.

https://www.zerohedge.com/covid-19/theyve-learned-nothing-because-would-expose-too-much

WATCH: Nigel Farage Slams UK Budget in Fiery Press Conference

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FvjYzGs14rw

>>23902115

https://drtesslawrie.substack.com/p/breaking-news-uk-police-were-ordered

BREAKING NEWS: UK POLICE were ordered not to act on evidence of COVID-19 crimes

We wondered why Superintendent Pete Hill ignored the evidence of malfeasance and misconduct we sent him in June 2021. Finally we know the answer.