/pol/ - Politically Incorrect

“space” is fake as fuck all they do is launder money

>>13602207

its pretty well established that those claiming that nasa and space are fake and gay are themselves fake and gay.

>>13602207

https://youtu.be/XKUD09kmaAI

>>13602318

Even on infinitychan we cannot escape the eternal leaf and his abhorrent posts

I hate NASA as much as I hate the real 911 assholes aka the CIA. Trump is a retard going along with NASA bull and saying nothing about 911 being obviously 1000% ffake narrative. We have the greatest president in my life time and hes a NASA/911 believer. Fuxk him and his daughters! The sons dont say shit either about how fake and gay the psyops are

Fuck all of them. We need rope for every .gov employee no more BS! Top down hang em all.

I just stepped outside to pee in the grass (9:53pm EST) and a green object heading in a W to E direction passed overhead. It was clearly at a very high altitude and was moving very fast, and suddenly blanked out. It was gone. I watched it cross the entire visible sky and disappear. I'd like to know wtf that was. It wasn't a plane.

>>13604007

Bro that was a drone man made. Aliens from outer space do not exist. Men from far away lands do exist.

Imagine all the gaskits that would need to be changed on the ISS. On a submarine there is a workshop that can produce any part needed for that submarine. Nasa never mentioned an onboard workshop to make parts for the ISS. Gaskits must be changed its that simple.

Imagine going from negative 300 C to positive 300C on the moon. More Julys than 6 million.

>>13602318

everything is fake until proven gay

It's definitely comms

A warning of sorts

I'm an insider at NASA and your right, were completely full of shit

Every Mars photo or video is from Greenland or Iceland I forget which.

>>13606131

devon island

>>13602353

you cant avoid the truth, which is that you fake and gay

>>13604038

not even accurate. hoaxies just cant into facts.

The meteor names thing is interesting and deserves more research, I think.

Now there are things that are pure retardation. For example, some anons accuse NASA of altering the colors of Mars to create a false impression that the planet is different from Earth, but that's not how things work. The photographs taken by satellites, probes and all this other equipment don't work like ordinary cameras. They are usually capturing information in a multitude of "bands", and the real image is not something made for the human eye. If you want to see the image like a human, you'll need to take certain bands that are more or less compatible with visible light and assign colors to them. The idea that they are manipulating the images is correct, but only because without manipulation you won't get an useful image.

>>13602207

1.They want you to believe scientism, the babylonian death cult lightning rod. the religion of lies and deceit

>>13608135

Is Nimrod - Azazel?

>>13608137

doesnt matter. its all satans team. team lie, team pain, team hate

>>13608144

checked

space is real, nazi technology and scientists got us there

now, in the absence of nazi scientists, the technology is falling into disrepair and being forgotten, so space travel becomes ever more risky

thankfully, a real life nazi decided he wanted to go back to space, and so we have a real life nazi space exploration company making brand new nazi rockets to go to space, who are already revolutionizing space access in the 21st century

if you think space is fake, you are retarded, space is the domain of the aryan, and only aryans ever made technology to get us there - all chinkoid/slavic technology is nazi derived, or stolen IP

>>13608152

why havent we been on the moon or mars yet?

space is 100% a made up thing.

>>13608158

we went to the moon several times with nazi technology

nazi germany would have been on mars by the 60's if they had won

space isn't made up, but your RETARDED RELIGIOUS MYTHOLOGY definitely is

REMINDER: ALL UNITED STATES SPACE TECHNOLOGY WAS MADE OR DERIVED FROM NAZI TECHNOLOGY. THEY HAD TO BRING NAZI ROCKET SCIENTISTS ONBOARD TO EVEN GET INTO ORBIT.

NON-ARYANS CANNOT ACCESS SPACE. ARYANS CAN. THAT IS WHY NON-ARAYANS WANT TO PRETEND SPACE ISN'T REAL. IT IS THE ULTIMATE SOUR GRAPES COPE!

>>13608165

Rude! and no, space is still fake and very gay

>>13608100

>deserves more research

it needs a quick check to make sure its bullshit just like everything else these faggots claim. notice how he didn't have the slightest bit of evidence for it?

>>13608271

Yes, but giving nicknames to meteors is something totally arbitrary, as far as I know, so if you investigate, you'll probably find the intention behind who named the meteor. It could be a guy trying to pay homage to someone, or a nutter from a secret society passing on a message, I don't know, but at least there's something real to be deciphered there.

That's already ahead of most conspiracies on the subject (some of them, I believe, are deliberately made to cause distraction, as when American intelligence realized that it was useful to boost conspiracies about UFOs as a way of obscuring military technologies).

>>13602207

because they figured out its easier to fake space missions than actually doing them for real.

like imagine you get a budget approved of 10 billion dollars to send a rocket to space to do whatever.

now spending the 10 billion on that would be a huge waste from a jewish pov.

So what do they do?

they go to their studio, roll out the greenscreen and shoot the entire thing in like a day for a budget of not even 1 million.

Now the rest of the money can be shoved anywhere they want, to their friends and family and secret black projects.

Fraud is always cheaper than doing it for real.

Before I even begin scrolling down, there's going to be a leaf flag here shilling for NASA I know it.

>>13602318

That didn't take long

>>13608152

>Philippines flag

>space is the domain of the aryan

>>13602207

They hire sub 80 IQ niggers. Their legacy as a scientific organization is moribund and dead for the past thirty years. Hence them needing to make up bullshit.

>>13608734

same for you. not like theres a lot of activity on here anyway. whats your point? thats its ok for you to be a moron posting about how the moon landings were faked and the earth is flat but its not ok for others to object to your foolishness?

>>13608054

>anon mixing up Fahrenheit and Celsius disproves his point.

it's the minor spelling mistake meme come again.

>it's only 121 celsius (250F) during the day and -133 celsius (-208F) during the night

>shadowed areas are -246 celsius (-410F)

>Searing heat and bone-chilling cold are both common on the Moon, and changes in temperature are quick and dramatic, because the Moon doesn’t have an atmosphere like Earth does.

>Temperatures near the Moon’s equator can spike to over 250°F (121°C) in daylight, then plummet after nightfall to -208°F (-133°C). In deep craters near the Moon’s poles, permanent shadows keep the surface even colder — NASA’s Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter has measured temperatures lower than -410°F (-246°C).

>https://science.nasa.gov/moon/weather-on-the-moon/

>>13608100

So they do add color and edit photos?

>>13608859

Ok make sure you keep clinging to heresy and let us know what Shape the Abyss is!

>>13608909

> heresy

Go on, I'm listening. What heresy?

>>13602318

While space is real the farthest we've made it is the ISS. You'd have to be literally retarded to believe we had dune buggy's on the moon in the early 70s but we some how lost the ability to go back. That's for private and public sectors. You think bezos or musk couldn't afford to get moon tourism off the ground? Musk has already spent more than the Apollo missions and all he does is deliver unmanned craft to orbit, despite having the most advanced craft to every fly.

>>13608868

>I'm going to make several mistakes in super basic areas like spelling and units

>You still have to take me seriously

Get fucked nigger

>>13609131

>I was on /sci/ around that time and the goyim were salivating over it like was the second coming

Really? I've a mate who's diehard Science™ who'd defend it all until angry and even he was absolutely dismayed when that was released and I sent it to him, even he couldn't buy it despite his bias / preference for it.

the moon missions were diplomatic in nature, to make contact with and discuss things with the nazis on(inside) the moon, and see if they still held a grudge

they replied that if they held a grudge they would have already dropped rocks from the moon on whoever they wanted to destroy, and are now preoccupied with "other matters"

further missions were to determine if there was any type of technological/resource exchange possible, and some limited transfers took place, leading to modern microchips

>>13609190

Holy shit you're stupid.

>>13609131

i've never looked up the indian landing.

did they send any other footage?

>>13609125

>the general idea stays the same after corrections

>still will not discuss the idea

are you a glowie by any chance?

>>13609224

>Having standards make you glow

Are you perhaps jewish?

>>13609202

Somebody filmed the screen where the metadata video was playing. Anyway I posted the "real" footage, not sure if there is more, probably not but at this point they don't need to deliver anything since the chattel have been sold so much on these narratives in the past decades, that they will desperately buy anything now, even a blank image as long as it reinforces the globohomo model they've been programmed with.

And sooner than later, the jewish AI will churn out these narratives faster and more plentiful than everything jewry has produced in the past five thousand years. It's the holy grail of narratives and will generate endless engagement from chattel.

>>13608868

so it really wasnt 300c either way was it? not even close. whats even the point of mentioning these temps anyway? is it supposed to support the idea that the moonlandings were faked?

isnt that a bit stupid though, since you can find temps of 120C on earth in several places, and only a little less cold, when you consider wind chill, as well. fact is its way easier to deal with the temps on the moon for the simple fact that theres no air.

>>13609095

you know thats never been claimed to be actual footage. its just a graphic they showed during the landing to fill otherwise dead air. thats all

>>13608859

you assume that i havent, which is the usual 'troof seeker' arrogance. thing is that ive taken the time to look at all the moonhoax claims and just found them to be various shades of ignorance, which is likely why you dont want to actually talk about any of it.

>>13609108

so why dont you have any good arguments about specific reasons why it couldn't have been done? you just have these weak insinuations about how it should all be so very easy now which only show your ignorance of how industries work.

>musk has spent more than apollo

on what? seems very likely you just made that figure up.

>>13609190

> because he doesn't want to

because theres absolutely no reason to make such a foolish assumption. theres currently no supersonic passenger aircraft and most fags on here probably were not alive when there was. I guess thats fake too since no one cane seem to build another one, right?

No, not right - there are more factors involved.

>>13609342

its just a graphic for people to look at instead of the raw telemetry data. is this really so hard to understand?

>>13609460

>you know thats never been claimed to be actual footage. its just a graphic they showed during the landing to fill otherwise dead air. thats all

kek, they showed it worldwide to be the landing, only to paddle back after too many people told them to fuck off

they didn't show "the real footage", because there is no real footage

>moon landing

oh yeah, the moon stones that turned out to be petrified wood, or the suits that don't shield against radiation (nor does the capsule)

the moon landing is a filter for retardos

>>13609523

>because there is no real footage

i guess the lander was not equipped to transmit or record the landing then. nobody claimed that was real footage you damn liar.

>>13609523

>, the moon stones that turned out to be petrified wood,

dont you ever get tired of posting the same lies all the time?

https://www.moonhoaxdebunked.com/2017/07/98-how-come-moon-rock-donated-to.html

>that don't shield against radiation

everything shields against some radiation so its doubtful youve done the first bit of reading about it. how much radiation exposure is there on the moon anyway? i bet you have no idea about that either.

https://www.sciencealert.com/scientists-predict-how-long-humans-can-survive-radiation-on-the-moon

>nor does the capsule

lol, of course it does. with about 8g/cm2 average density the CM did a fine job in that regard. the LM a little less of course but again, you need to put it in context of what the exposure is anyway.

>>13609224

>>the general idea stays the same after corrections

what is the general idea?

>>13609609

>>13609558

>the dutch national museum lies now to us?

>the manufacturer said, please don't, our suits don't do shit against radiation

oh, no, no, leafbro, our response?

>>13609592

that very sudden and radical changes in temperatur are difficult to manage, material wise

>>13609629

he will just say that we lie

>>13609609

>it really is hard to understand why idiots need a circus around their "science"

no one claimed it was real footage of the landing apart from space is fake and gay retards like you. Same thing with the TV graphics they made up for the apollo 11 landing. retards have claimed that proves it was faked too. retards are so creative.

>your list of half truth and misrepresentations

would you like to pick your favorite out of that list because im not playing your game of answering your gorillion points all at once.

> they never said that the footage is fake.

you're special aren't you germ.

>hey told us that after the fact that their tape looks like 2d CGI made by a toddler

no, that was obvious to anyone with a brain. nobody thought it was real…well, maybe some jeets did, but anyone smarter than your basic street jeet would realise 'hmm, how could that be real footage anyway since it would need another lander to follow it with the camera'

>the dutch national museum lies now to us?

can museums make a mistake? think though - why does that one sample and its shitty little business card look absolutely nothing like any other gifted sample? no other gifted sample was ever even just a loose rock like that, let alone accompanied by a little card that doesn't even reference the rock itself, which are all cataloged etc.

>don't do shit against radiation.

yeah no shit against that kind of power of radiation.

>lots and lots of it, according to the science you defend right now

you've not a clue have you? and yet here you are, dying on this hill, as you do with every single other hill. lol. just go look up what that kind of daily dose is like for a person instead of dismissing something you dont want to look at.

did you notice how long it said people could stay on the surface for? did you read that far?

>it is practically a microwave ov

prove that

>>13609634

which is why everything was covered in a highly reflective outer layer. the temp swings arent that radical however - you have to keep in mind that take a lot longer for materials to lose heat in vacuum.

>>13609660

you're special too, or just trolling. the globe is in the same section a book on cars you faggot. see how the fiction section is its own little contained set of shelves?

and find the source that space x video. ive looked before but never found it. id go so far as to say that its a fake thing because you really do have to lie, to flerf

>>13609460

>fact is its way easier to deal with the temps on the moon for the simple fact that theres no air.

In a vacuum, which is what space generally is, the only way a temperature regulation system would work is by radiating or absorbing heat via radiation, but the white color of the astronaut suit makes it a poor heat radiator and absorber. Since there's no other means to exchange heat with the surrounding environment in a suit other than through radiation, there's no way for the suit to work as an effective temperature regulator.

There are videos of astronauts training underwater or in the sky doing free fall to simulate low gravity environments, but you never see them training in environments with extreme temperatures.

>>13602209

>>13608057

If my last digits end in 0-5 these are bots

6-9 They are muzzies

If I get dubs these are Kikes

If I get trips They are NSA information operatives.

>>13609689

>but the white color of the astronaut suit makes it a poor heat radiator and absorber.

you really should look into how the suit ejected heat from the inside anon. while you're right that the white beta cloth out layer was a poor absorber of infra red, as it was meant to be, they didn't rely on it to get rid of heat. that was taken care of by a circulating water coolant system which expelled the heat constantly in a small amount of water via sublimation.

>but you never see them training in environments with extreme temperatures.

well for a start you'd need to look at the max temps measured during the landings. they never were on the surface during lunar noon. it was always morning, i think, so the temps were a lot lower. and then, you can bet the suits were extensively tested for their ability to control the inside temp, especially after the experiences of some guys during the Gemini project - sometimes they'd get so sweaty that they couldnt see what they were doing. thats obvioulsy very dangerous.

>>13609706

you just dont have anything better to say do you…just this silly vague waffle.

>>13602209

>space” is fake as fuck all they do is launder money

You forgot and fire obilisks at the firmirment same they have done millenia. Also its about $59,000,000.00 a day last i checked.

>>13609720

bringing the fire Kraut

>>13609720

>i saw that tape on the news

oh ok i'll believe you about that then and accept that you believe everything you see on the TV, because nightly news journos are so accurate and stuff.

>the njeets tried to scam us,

no they didn't. nobody ever believed that was real, no least for the reason i mentioned and which you ignored.

>a typical lier game play.

not at all. the liar game is to fire out the gorillion points all at once. its a very typical bad faith debating tactic.

> that means they tried to scam me

fucking hell you're really really special. lol. sad.

>"moon stones"

it was one little piece of loose red rock. you didn't even read the article did you? you can see the whole chain of events laid out in that and the short of it is that it was never a moonrock. moon rocks were never ever presented like that.

>do NOTHING against radiation

you have a problem with context i see. the suits would do nothing against the type of radiation at chernobyl. they do plenty against, for example, alpha particle radiation.

educate yourself

https://www.clavius.org/envradintro.html

>no matter how strong or weak the radiation is

you think all radiation is the same thing dont you? please read the pages i linked to above

>n space, there is radiation,

what kind? what energy a flux? be specific because you're just flailing around at the moment, making stuff up as you go.

>a metal box getting hit by radiation is like a radiation trap

very much depends on the total construction, which again you've clearly never bothered to look into. was the CM just a metal box? was there anything in the walls of it?

again, a lot of this is covered in the two pages dealing with radiation on that link above.

>>13609740

>the suits are not "highly reflective"

yes, they are really. look up the tested reflectivity of the beta cloth used on the outer layer of the EVA suits. its in the 80-90% range.

> the pappmarché on the ship looked pretty dull to me too

again, look up the properties of multiple layers of the maylar sheeting used on the LM

> they would not have used gold

lol, great idea. shame it would weight more than the craft itself, but you go on declaring your genius engineering ideas.

>>13609739

he's right y'know, the manufacturer didn't say the suits don't work against a particular type of radiation. The manufacturer said they don't work against radiation period.

>>13609783

>you trying to weasel your way out of this

im not. news broadcasts are put together very quickly and the journos doing it often dont know anything about the subject of the article. just because it wasnt spelled out in big letters for the slow ones in the class is not proof of deliberate deception.

it clearly was never claimed to be real by anyone and how could it be? how would it even have been filmed?

>and yet you didn't addressed a single point

because there are already several points under discussion. you threw out another block of them to water down the discussion so you can hide from the details you dont like.

>"the manufacterer said the suits don't shield against radiation"

show the context then. all ive got is your vague claim so far.

> NASA (the guys you defend) told me blah blah blah

its not their fault if you read some absolutely basic 5 minute article and then base your entire worldview on that, is it now?

>does it matter

of course it does.

>wishing me to be stupid is a very stupid tactic ranjeesh

your every statement on the issue clearly demonstrates that you dont have a clue.

thats why you've been shifting around and avoiding to get specific about anything.

>so you know better than the actual producers of these suits?

the information on beta cloth visual light and IR reflectivity if from the manufacturer anon. it rejects up to 90% of whatever strikes it.

>they used gold on the craft,

i dont think its actually gold. look it up. its a layered blanket made up of mylar and kapton.

>>13609799

where was that said?

>>13609820

Where was what you said, said?

Can I get your thoughts on this brief 5 minute video

https://odysee.com/@januszkowalskii1979:e/Katy-Perry-Kissed-the-Ground...-and-She-Liked-It!-(Eric-Dubay):a

>>13609822

>Where was what you said, said?

you'd really have to read the previous posts to find that out

>my video

no thanks, not right now. maybe later.

>>13609834

>no thanks, not right now. maybe later.

Why not? Are you an AI bot that can't watch videos?

anyway im out of here. will check in tomorrow.

>>13609847

no, i just dont want to watch your fucking flat earther made crap right now. i was nice about but you were an asshole.

>>13609848

>>13609850

if i post it again tomorrow will you watch it?

>>13609871

>that many women

you convinced me

>>13608746

He's clearly a sex tourist you moron

>>13609705

It doesn't matter how the internal mechanics of suit work because the system is closed. Since the suit doesn't use any special substances for thermal regulation, the suit will reach thermal equilibrium in a short period of time. Past that point, no temperature regulation would be possible.

>>13609969

He's a non-White sex tourist so, read his other posts.

>>13602207

>Why does a space agency, that is so incompetent it leaves astronauts literally stranded

That was Boeing, not NASA, but your point still stands.

So what if i fucked up the temps and th3 celsius etc. The fact is there is no moon to send anything too.the moon is reflection of the sun onto the ice wall. Im not going to brainwash myself with all that nasa trash. Even beforw i had the internet i knew nasa was bullshit when i read about it in science txt books. Its just like the other guy sais its a humiliation ritual. You can either fall for it or pay attenti9n to the details realize that could never happen. I grew up innawoods in the cold, and i can tell you there is no clothing that will protect you from -300c to 300c, nor is there clothing that can protect from the bs specs you quoted as well. It's a strategy of mine to change numbers to show the absurdity when the original data is absurd as well. Another technique is to mispell words to trip up a responder and have them shoot their mouth off about the grammer errors instead of the real argument. Fuck Space it is gay and fake. Trump has to know this is bullshit and i hiope he is investigating elon and nasa for fraud.

>>13602207

Actually I like NASA because of Aliens. I feel alone and NASA is the only one in the universe trying to help!

>>13614200

Aliens? LOL nah just humans from far off lands us prolls havent heard of.

Heres what i have gathered from nearly a decade of viewing Globe Busters.

The sun is 32 Miles above us. 40 miles above the sun is a floating ocean of very cold gasses and then an ice wall. The planets are suspended in the cold gases.

>>13609460

>you can find temps of 120C on earth in several places

yeah, maybe a volcano , you fucking retard

Another thing if the earth is spinning 200mph, how in the fuck would a helium baloon stay in sink? I hate the fact that my parents struggeled and fought each other over money because of property taxes etc and what was it used for for bullshit like the earth is spinning. I want a refund so fucking bad. The time the school showed us a Laser Disc of ISS footage and told us it was a live stream. I kept thinking 28.8k modems cannot connect to space and maintain a good connection.

>>13616367

Ok so the earth is spinning 33mph and the moon is moving at Some speed. How the fuck did they make a phone call to the moon? LOL

yes

>>13615707

yes, and people work in those environments al the time. so do fire fighters inside burning buildings. notice how their suits dont melt?

Notice how none of you have a single sensible thing to say about the temperatures on the moon? not a single thing.

>>13614187

>d i can tell you there is no clothing that will protect you from -300c to 300c,

its 120c to about -135c, and those temps were not encountered during any of the landings because there were there in the lunar morning.

>>13609861

>what kind of context is missing?

the context where you display whatever it is you're referring to instead of on nothing but your own claims.

>from the NASA website or interviews with NASA employees

its likely i know which two sources you're lying about. one of them is almost certainly that same very old little clip where the designers of the nav computer for Orion talks about having to make sure he shields it properly. Whats the others one? a quick article that makes general statements about radiation in space but very little specifically. is that right?

time to start posting your sources

>how? tell me

because some kinds of radiation are fairly easy to protect against over long periods of time while others are not, and that changes what we're talking about. protecting against what is found in the VAB is pretty easy for example while finding long term solutions to protect against what comes out during a solar flare and the heavy particles which make up the more dangerous part of cosmic background radiation are not.

what are you even talking about? do you know?

>okay, you know better than the producer. you could have just said "yes"

just post your source for what you think the manufacturer said.

> NASA said it is gold, you can't accept that i defeat NASA with their own statements

where? post your source

>the funny part is, you attack NASA talking points, to defend NASA

the funny part is that you skim read some popsci level articles and think you've uncovered the hidden truth. that really is funny.

>>13616497

>How the fuck did they make a phone call to the moon?

by having large ground based dishes spaced out around the world so there was always at least one able to get line of sight to the moon. not a complicated idea.

>>13609979

>because the system is closed.

not its not. water circulates through a system of tubes woven into the suit near the wearers skin and picks up heat. how much depends upon flow rate which was adjustable. some of that water was released to the outside of the suit via sublimation. you can just go look how the environmental control system of the A7-L suit worked if you like.

From what i have read its pretty likely that almost zero heat was picked up from outside the suit because its excellent reflective layers and its insulation beneath them. it was all generated by the guy wearing it.

>>13617791

ah, the retard is back

no context is needed in an absolute

for the fourth time. the maker of the suits said "no radiation protection, zero"

you fleeing into semantic arguements shows your desperate shilling

>its likely i know which two sources you're lying about.

>sourcing NASAdata to critique NASA is le dumb

you call me a liar for citing those that you defend. i hope one day you can accept how stupid this is

>because some kinds of radiation are fairly easy to protect against

and again, the manufacturur told us "ZERO PROTECTION". so all your dribble about various kinds of radiation is retarded

>zero protecetion

>>"but what about this radiation?"

>no matter, zero protection

i bet i have to repeat this in the next post

>just post your source

nigger, you will never be content with any source i post. hell, you even call NASA liars, to defend them against my accusations of them lieying

>where? post your source

some guy from NASA said that

do your own digging

>the funny part is that you skim read some popsci level articles

and again, the mind reader shows himself

i use NASA talking points, you get angry and accuse me of being stupid

i know you want to shill for them, to catch idiots into your bizzare make believe world

only point is, your method is pathetic and easy to see through

>>13617785

>its 120c to about -135c, and those temps were not encountered during any of the landings because there were there in the lunar morning.

kek, again, you talk against NASAs narrative.

since there is no atmossphere to talk of on the moon, the moment the sunrays hit the surface, the temp goes up in an instant. how often do you want to deny NASA, in your quest to safe NASA? all you do is debunking NASA

your cognitive dissonance is strong

>>13617785

>yes, and people work in those environments al the time.

a guy in an active volcano doesn't have to ferar that the volcano drops 200° in under half a minute. that is anons point, the big swings in temp (bad for material). you selectivly being stupid doesn't help

>>13617877

in space, sweating doesn't work

if you release hot water, the rest of the body will remain at temp. that was anons point (again). in space, you can only reduce heat by radiating it out. if you have a problem with that, again, you have to fight NASA over it

we merely using NASAs propaganda against them

if we are right, NASA lies

if you are right, NASA lies

simple as

>>13618148

> the maker of the suits said "no radiation protection, zero"

so you keep claiming all the while refusing to post the evidence. i wonder why.

>i hope one day

i hope that one day you will be a brave boy and post your sources.

>i bet i have to repeat this in the next post

im sure you're right since you still have no idea what you're talking about and this is all you have.

>you will never be content with any source i post

you should try and post the ones currently under consideration and you can test your hypothesis.

>i use NASA talking points

thats yet to be decided since you refuse to post the sources you claim to find these points in.

>the temp goes up in an instant.

how quickly? surface heating is obviously which faster than for the rest of the material and the outer layer of the suit was fiberglass beta cloth anyway. what even is your point?

also, you realize that 120c is only slightly hotter than boiling water i suppose, and have you ever noticed how that cups and cheap rubber garden hoses etc dont spontaneously explode when exposed to that substance?

> in under half a minute.

you're just making stuff up at this point. have you any evidence that a)the temp of the OBJECT instantly goes poof and loses all its heat or b)that this, if it were even physically possible which it isnt, that the materials involved would be troubled by it? no. of course you dont.

>sweating doesn't work

do you know what happens to liquid water when you release it into a vacuum?

look into it sometime. you might not make so many silly made up objections.

>blah blah nasa lies

>nasa lies

>blah blah blah

>>13618148

and again, please re-read this >>13617877 because thats exactly how it works. the key word is 'sublimation'.

you could have read something about this before doubling down on your retarded, sperg-like, points.

>>13618847

> so i watched the NASA spokesperson/suit manufacturur

so still no source to support what you're claiming or that i can see the context of what they said? why?

>your precious NASA is talking how it is not possible to penetrate the van allen belt

no it doesn't. not anywhere. you wont post where you think you saw this of course.

>suits are not able to shield against radiation

why are you so reluctant to read anything about radiation so that you'll start to understand how silly this statement is? i gave you a great intro to radiation above but you ignored it completely.

>no sense in posting them

lol, ok.

>it vanishes in the vacuum

yeah…taking the heat with it. thats it. thats how the suit was designed to eject heat from the inside.

>if you are not in the shade, the temp is mounting.

how energy is coming in from the sun? how much is being reflected by the suit? how much is being lost of what heat does manage to heat the outer layers of the suit? is it more than the environmental system can dump out? what about the heat the guy generates inside the suit? how much is that?

ive looked into all that stuff but why havent you?

>how much water do they had to have, in their suits,

look it up. you're not interested in the answers whatsoever, that much is very obvious because you could quickly look it up instead of blathering on like you are.

>over boiling water temps",

what? are you drunk? where do you get the idea thats even possible? what are you not getting about them always being there during lunar morning?

>you made another field of explaination for yourself,

no i didnt. i just made a simple observation that the heckin scary temps you guys go on about are not actually a challenge to materials used for such environments.

>>13618859

>18148

>>13618859

>are not actually a challenge to materials used for such environments

never tested outside of "trust me bro"

t. nasa

>>over boiling water temps",

>what? are you drunk?

yes, and still i know about boiling water

>temp over 100°=boiling

and since the temps go over 100° cel, it has to boil at some point

shade and blast make simple turns into a risky defrost mission

and you are telling me that they have installed a heat release water system in the suits?

you need to blast lots of water to regulate this temp. and i think to know, that low pressure makes water boil even on lower temps, taking less energie (heat) with it, otherwise you have a low temp steam explosion in your suit (ripping it apart=you die)

and that's what i mean with liers

you forget one thing in your own lore, you get fucked by logic and your own laws

you ask for proof, while you are fighting against the truth you defend

OP this is not a bad post, and a very fitting image. I think your last question, to me, sums it up best. IMHO you should probably keep your space research encapsulated from your Russian counter-propaganda.

>>13618866

yeah, im done with you. you're not even pretending to try talking about this subject based on anything but your own randomly generated bits of bullshit. Thankfully its very easy to look all this stuff up instead of tying yourself in crazy like you're doing.

Sad really - you so dont want the moon landings to be real that you deliberately blind yourself to learning anything. you cant even post the sources you base your claims on, while ignoring anything you're presented with. Its gotten boring at this point.

>>13618874

It's the Red Scare. Nobody knows what to believe.

>>13618874

i open a subject, talkin about what NASA said, and physics told me

you flee into semantics and denying NASA talking points

your side build this fortress, not my problem you build something so lacking

volcano suits, deep diving and subs into the depths of the deep oceans, no problems with the narrative, but if one brings up the problems with deep space, the narrative is rewritten as the questions keep on coming

you need to provide prove your points, and yet, you want me to do that

it's your narrative, so support it yourslef

>>13618888

you could just post the sources for what you claim are nasas talking points but you refuse.

>no problem….

the problem is that you're making shit up when you could look them up instead and not make so many stupid ignorant comments.

>>13602207

>how asteroid and comet predictions always coincided with political headlines

I bet that asteroid and comet stories also coincide with slow news day.

>>13604038

>Imagine going from negative 300 C to positive 300C on the moon.

Space does not have a temperature because space is a vacuum and heat is caused by the motion of atoms. Astronauts on the surface of the moon are in a vacuum.

If you place a thermometer on the moon or in space, it absorbs some energy from light and also radiates energy away in the infrared part of the spectrum. The temperature reading on the thermometer changes until the two are in equilibrium [heat in = heat out]. The thermometer can reach equilibrium because the rate at which it radiates heat away increases with the temperature (Stefan-Boltzmann's Law).

If you place the thermometer in sunlight in outer space, the temperature changes until it reaches thermal equilibrium at something like 120 C. Then if you take it out of the sunlight the temperature changes until it reaches thermal equilibrium at something like -180C.