/pnd/ - Politics, News, Debate

>>115982

District and County

In WHITE states: The plan is to choose either a blue county bordering a red county, and live in the red county next to or the blue county itself, near the border between blue and red. In this way one may change the demographics of this ulcer and cancer, as well as push back against the poz directly on the individual level. Talk to others and sway them with abstract logic and reasoning, science, pathos and ethos (your character). Act as if your views are perfectly natural and common, well-established fact. The point is that with liberals everything is a slippery slope, so be conservative - convey principles. This is after you establish yourself legally and financially though. Look for likeminded people before you try to turn minds. Use actual history, buy actual books rather than e-books (no one will read an e-book you share with them unless they already believe you).

If you win some legal battle it may attract more red as well. You should be homesteading so it should be cheap to buy land, so any money sunk in a blue county may not be too much of a loss either which way. Your choice whether you go red or blue here, but stay near the border.

Obligation to Homestead

Power generation is easy. Very easy. Don't stay in clearnet channels on this one. Collecting water shouldn't be an issue either, and you can look up for free where the water table is if you dig a well, collecting and filtering rain water is easy. If you buy land with clay you can literally spin a generator with a bicycle that powers an electric oven/kiln to create clay bricks. Otherwise you can just start a fire in a clay oven dug around a pit. You then stack bricks. You then have a home, especially if you use a clay arch using the ole mason keystone for the roof. You use clay as the adhesive between clay bricks. Or you can buy an aluminum shed and stack up dirt and perhaps get old tires from a junk lot, all to create insulation around the shed.

Point is, it's easy to get started for cheap, and there is every number of options for you if you have money. You can buy a shipping container to live in and get power and water built into it by some contractor. You can live in a trailor. You can do all of the above and have a mini village of buildings for different purposes. The point is you get to the state and be self-reliant. Being reliant on the state is not white, and it is not a good feeling to any self-respecting man knowing you need the State. And if saboteurs strike the power or water? You'll be fine. You could help others even.

If you do all this, think of the example you set and how you can build relationships with others. You can help others that want to move to the state, or help those that already live there.

>>115982

>Texas is redpilled.

Oh you sweet summer child. You fell for the memes.

>>116002

How bad is it?

>>116004

Houston and Austin are literal BLM headquarters, San Antonio is 60% spic and DFW is homo-heaven. Out west is empty desert and the panhandle is trailer trash. Yeah, a bunch of them might vote Republican, but Texas is basically Libertarian with a sprinkling of Bush-tier GOP. It could swing Democrat extremely easily.

>>116018

more tax evasion scam shilling?

>>116018

http://gen.lib.rus.ec/book/index.php?md5=D486326A943253F6743CC71FC462010A

Another book on income tax.

>>116019

Prove it.

>>116019

Tt's federal income tax, not state or local.

>>116009

>he panhandle is trailer trash

and?

I endorse this thread and white flight. People act like it is a bad thing, but eventually we will be able to gain control over a state or two if whites, especially nationalists, moved in mass there. Montana Wyoming and Idaho seem like good picks. Once we are together, in will become easier to organize politically.

>>115982

why are all the white states in the direct blast radius of yellowstone

>>116018

I don't know why I said it's not on the books, but there's a specific procedure to get out of paying taxes, as with achieving any other legal objectives, and I will go into more detail on this specifically once my internet stops getting interfered with (or just fucking up) and my research is expedited.

Once again, I wanted to start with getting the thread started so people could contribute what they know about their state or state's they've lived in or visited.

Running away from centres of power and influence and ceding ground only prolongs the inevitable.

Domination/Empire/Imperium > balkanization/ethnostates

>>115982

canada will collapse right before america does, and summer is the best time to homestead in canada. White non-combatants (women and men below the age of 16 and above the age of 50) should be evacuated to BC and the plains provinces and the fighting men or combat pacifists should alternate staying with them and rotating to America where the fight for political supremacy will be the hottest. (by combat pacifists I mean signal specialists, doctors, couriers, or other positions generally held by those whose disposition is bad for a fighting man but whose will and physique is good, likely the majority of anons that don't die in the next few months will be this)

>>116253

to continue my rant about canada, I believe the majority of canadian nonwhites will evacuate by the same channels they entered by. They are already doing so in the case of east asians, but I believe the african canadians will similarly flee once they realize whats going on. oh also the cascade mountain range in washington and oregon is already pockmarked with white nationalist homesteaders, this will be a very hot range.

>>116257

All Africans i've ever talked to or had the displeasure of being around always talk about going to the US. Nashville, specifically.

>>116253

As OP, I really don't believe Canada or the US will collapse. I believe outside pressures will try and make Canada and the US collapse but the only result will be some temporary balkanization if anything. Idaho, Montana and Wyoming are good places to hole up if that's what people want to do, and wild mountainous regions are good.

>>116257

I doubt that.

>>116268

Oddly specific.

>>116273

I'm interested, what lines do you see us balkanizing along? Theoretical borders? I'm excited for this to actually happen.

>>116378

Balkanization is retarded, it was retarded for the nations it's named after, it was retarded for the Middle East who only helped Israel control them and expand its borders, and it's still retarded now.

How are we still having these conversations? How do self-identifying 'nationalists' still not understand this? Balkanization is antithetical to our ideas. If the already geopolitically falling US balkanizes, epsecially while Israel or China or Russia *aren't*, all it will do is futher open itself up to foreign infiltration, occupation and subversion. Why would you want to cede ground, concentrate all whites into specific areas, metaphorically running away to the corners of the land, and then expect the same people that want you dead to grant you states, ethno- or otherwise??

STOP running away - expand and DOMINATE.

>>116407

Of course it's not ideal, but it would at least be entertaining. A balkanized America would be only temporary I'm sure. At this point at least.

>>116407

What do you think about refederalizing with a mid-step in between state and federal government, representing regional government? All the regulatory shit can be moved to the regional governments, who are in a better position to say what measures are required or not for their situation. The military would still be federal, the federal government would still be in charge of international diplomacy, but practically everything else that can be moved to the state or regional level is moved. I think this would solve the problem of an overbearing federal government without precipitating a collapse in state viability

The Great Lakes region is pretty normal outside of the cities and is far enough from yellowstone to not get completely wrecked. Also, less chance of getting nuked, the fresh water supply is too important whereas I could see bombs falling in the pacific NW if some sort of enclave popped up there. Just my thoughts

>>116527

This guy is thinking really well. Also question. If the chinks really wanted to fuck shit up or anyone that wants to nuke USA for that matter wouldn't they just throw a nuke at Yellowstone ? Would that make it go boom ? ( i am not a geologist )

>>116273

Idaho, Montana, and Wyoming seem great, I think only two problems exist, one being the super volcano, and the other being heavy influence from liberal pacific northwest.

>>116528

This, we need to plant spies in asian countries and wiretap them. Also we need to focus on redpilling Alaska, given that it is protected from ash by the cascades and rocky mountains. I think if a nuke were sent to yellowstone, it might blow up, but most likely nothing would happen as the energy would be in the air and not on the ground, and the volcano would be sealed so it wouldn't erupt unless the chinks figured out how to place a nuke that would go underground, though this would even be likely to fail.

>>116230

This, but places like Alaska's southeast have a very similar climate to northwest Europe. It may be an upgrade from places like new england where the climate is similar to japan. If we centered our population on places with similar climates to europe, then our populations would be more productive as there would be less need for cooling in the summer or heating in the winter. Also, if we move en mass to places like Europe, it may be even better as we would be able to take back the land rather than run away to a colony as whites have been doing for so long.

>>116407

The idea isn't to force balkanization retard. Jesus fucking christ. A few thousand moving to better lands won't destroy the US. Tens of thousands won't either. Only a few hundred frequent this cite and moving is a big deal for most people, and clearly not everyone agrees with the plan, but getting hundreds to these areas is smart as fuck. Thousands is the goal though.

>>116378

The idea is that we have 'strongholds', strong arming against anyone that tries to 'invade' (migrate) that is PoC and antithetical to what we believe in. We amplify our point of view (most appropriate and digestible is loudest, less digestible requires some 1 on 1 and network building with shit to back it up), we gain land and legal status, and we push for certain changes that change how people think and behave to better fit what we're aiming for.

>>116420

Funnily enough, the actually balkanized state of the US has kept it from going all out war (the 50 states). Consolidating power would embolden regions to separate from the other regions politically. So that is a terrible idea, and that screeching anon above is retarded. The issues generally involve a lack of demographic control though. If we can control demographics without expelling them (as that would lead to full collapse across the country from TRUE balkanization), then we can create these stronghold states that anyone's family can live in, and venture into GREEN and GREY and even BLACK territories but as groups formed in the WHITE states. Good plan yeah? It's a temporary regrouping of sorts, great for networking, great for families and housing our possessions, great legally (we need to push here), just great overall. >>116407 So essentially he isn't wrong.

>>116527

Are they politically and legally cucked? Great resource, what with water access to the ocean, and the lakes themselves, but they might be cucked hard.

>>116562

They're rather red places, white nationalists in the area. There are 2 blue counties in all of Idaho and I haven't checked Montana in a while but it should be similar. Stopping the flood of Blue (BLACK) is important though and this requires people pushing back.

Don't get trapped in the sensationalist cycle. Common trick. It stops all build up being in visceral fight mode all the time - we need to win demographic and legal battles. If shit hits the fans it's in 30 years. You might not agree but even if it's in 10 years we need at least tens of anons to become legally competent and fight legal battles, for themselves and then others. The plan for hundreds though, ( tens of thousands if this plan lifts off the ground and leaves this site) is to strongarm the local governments of the WHITE states to BAN the migration of non-whites on the city, then county then state level. We want to establish that we can stop a person from moving into a region on any criteria we wish; I doubt we can stop people from visiting, legally, and that would make people too hostile towards local PoCs that we could never 'get away with it'.

>>116572

Europe is a clusterfuck cucked by the EU. No one here is familiar with their demographics or history of socio-political actions and behaviors so it would incredibly unwise to do so. America is fucking HUGE in every sense and we can't abandon it. That would be ridiculous.

>>116841

If we can get these states to limit cross-state traffic, no public transport, that would be enough (OP here responding to own post). That would be ENOUGH. Then we can get people to try and push things further as I described (well thought plans welcome) and people stuck in the GREEN zones can communicate with those in WHITE and try to get similar shit done there. If you can't push the State push the City.

Remember: Threaten their paycheck. It's too easy to just do nothing as an employee of the State. Threaten their paycheck and these often risk-adverse fucks will buckle.

=\=

Political

What Does Not Work and The Plan

There won't be even a soft or true cold war for the next 10 - 30 years. So we have 10 years at least to push our policies, set up homesteads in the state of choice, and build up city, county, state and interstate networks and plan this shit out.

You don't believe me? Then what are we to do? After stockpiling and moving or bunkering down, what is there to do besides what I am about to suggest? There will be nothing to do for a long time, trust me, and if things turn to violence then one will likely base their plan on very specific local factors and very general know-how.

How often do we "plan shit out"? We are constantly held in a state of ready and on the cusp of "happening" - but this paralyzes one from acting, as no plan is good enough and war is "just around the corner" so there's no point, right? On the other side, there are those that are completely internally collapsed, barely pulling themselves out of the murk if at all, only light and clean air being some self-improvement steps they're taking.

There is more radical things we can be doing that aren't even radical. They are intelligent proactive actions. Not even violent. Though now you may look around and see that we wait.

We KNOW, especially now, that even if the frankfurt school fuckers are doing drastic shit it is best to let them destroy their own image and cities - but we must act on it. These are opportunities we should have been waiting for, ready to take legal and political action for inter-state border control, for self-defense laws, to push and champion policy in your city and to occupy the capital with legal and political demands such as changes to the state's constitution. If we have some legitimate legal case and strategy we can demand an expedited court case of 1 week. Any precedent, either win or lose, allows us to take another look at it and see where we went wrong and have the same individual challenge the decision or someone else create a parallel case not unlike the first. To clarify for any who aren't familiar with the legal process: a lot happens between court dates, even after a 'judgement' if you're doing things correctly.

>>117178

Political cont'

And then to defend the land, let there be trenches dug around communities of the like minded or at the will of a few, filling sand and silt bags or firing bricks from clay, and farms (on your yard? Your homestead?) within these entrenched communities. If the housing is sparse, dig around your property and at choke points if there are any, clear away trees and underbrush for vision, and create flat compressed ground so you can see any silhouette moving across it in the near-dark. Work with your neighbors to get them to do the same. Get a generator, store power in a protected way, have a means to hole up for a long while if you are 'sieged' and buy flood lights and motion detection lights to put all around your home. Encourage others to do the same.

Finally, we must push our internet operations begin into full swing. We've given up that territory. Everyone here is middle aged, they don't want to pull a #GamerGate or do what /pol/ used to. For this, to rally together our fractured boards and rev up the internet hate machine, would be perfect in these times.

The optics are as such: Fuck #GamerGate they have loli pedos and juvenile Ben Shapiro tier faggots. We must learn how NOT to be like what kicked this all off. The people here are smart enough to figure out that our message is more focused than that, but we have to remember to work often from the humor angle. WE are the "liberation". If we are too hamfisted it will not spread.

If anyone has a pet plan or some grandiose vision of theirs their input is welcome.

>>115982

I want to move to Idaho so bad right now. Just a couple of years and I'll be there.

Thanks for your invitation.

I don't have any vision grandiose nor I plan that can be pet.

There is a series of radical mistakes that will turn critical after any "fase 0", worse there is a FUNDAMENTAL FLAW: your "pet plan" rests in "I, me, my view, my happiness, I prefer, I´d like, I'd love, I etc."

You are dealing with a thing called SOVEREIGNITY, that is a something bigger then you, your sons even bigger than your people, is a thing trascendental. You can only understand Sovereignity if you undertood God.

God exists, War School taught me this.

You are dealing with the creation of a STATE, that is POWER, and Power is a collective political entity. You need an IDEA. What is the Idea of America? The Idea of America is called Americana.

The unique tool for the Creation of State is called War. Before you plan you need to understand the concept of War. To understand this you need some time before you understand the concept of Center of Gravity.

To develop an Independent State think of 3 layers

Layer 1

Energy - Metals - Food - People - Knowledge - Megaindustry

Level 2

Industry (and others)

Level 3

Trade (and others)

There is no Layer 1 in the mentioned Northern states ergo No development.

There is no other idea than "me myself" in Montana Idaho but the Center of Gravity in the -so called- "United States" is "Dixieland", Texas and the South. The only American idea is in Dixieland NATURAL RESOURCES are also there. The Enemy, your enemy, knew this long ago, why do you think they created the KKKs?

A Nation is not about what "I want I like", much less is War. To have Faith you need to lose yourself.

A Revolution in Texas is possible, but you need to put yourself in gear, but essentially you need a DRIVE other than "me myself".

There is one second viable option in Argentina, research "Plan Andinia". There is a war over Argentina, Patagonia and Antarctica and there is a Plan - not a pet - countering Plan Andinia.

Before you come up with "states + Caanada" I tell you NO, there is no national idea in Canada. To make a revotution you need PEOPLE WITH RAGE, WITH HATE AND WITH FAITH because only Faith can overcome Fear. The Men who will fight the beast are those with NOTHING ELSE TO LOSE OTHER THAN THEIR CHAINS.

Salutations

IMO I think the best approach is to go to the frontier. Whether that is Alaska, or Siberia, or Nunavut, or an island somewhere. Go someplace where you can stake out your land, grow/ranch your food, generate your own electricity, and otherwise live a life independent of western popular culture and the western polity. If such a thing is possible.

>>116002

>>116004

This man does not lie, Austin should be obvious to everyone but I can personally vouch for Houston. You know how many mixed race couples I see come into my work on a daily basis?

>>117226

you want us to clear trees and brush to what? turn our fucking homestead into Gettysburg?

Fuck that, you want to defend against hordes of niggers its in the woods..

Black people are the least interested and least likely to SET foot in the woods for any fucking reason whatsoever. your best defense is the foiliage asshole.

american nogs dont know what to do in a jungle that isnt made of leggos and concrete.

Guerilla Warfare and IEDs are gonna be more effective in denser brush as you can "create" the pathways you want intruders on

>>118328

The issue is visibility. You'll be sitting in your home or outside it and definitely won't notice people in the woods coming up.

I guess you could turn your place into one that literally blends into the jungle but I just don't see it without putting the building in a hill with knowledge of moisture wicking and water drainage.

There is in all likelihood going to be no 'war'. But a group of violent fuckers might go around and pop lone homesteaders in a state, hit 10 places or more in one night and no one will be the wiser for at least a week (so at least 70?). If five of those are high competence people that's quite a loss. I should say that some sort of alarm system would be important; if you're going with the alarm system and it's reliable then go ahead and live in brush. They won't see the wires and trip them. But it won't be easy to find them either way, so you'll be stuck in your home or you'll have to make a break into the woods and give up your home, hoping you won't run into anyone and that they aren't too close to shoot you as soon as you pop out. All in all I think a defensible position is the better idea.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TfrH97P6uRY

Gravel walls are heavy and requires some 'special' considerations but it really doesn't require 130IQ to build it right, and to do test runs of free standing walls or to brainstorm solutions. Having gun ports that open from the inside with anchor to prevent being blasted of its hinges or frame or whatever made of bullet proof steel, wouldn't be too difficult either. The planning has to be right though. Some thermal or night vision goggles would be useful of course.

All in all the resources available makes it possible to create a sort of bunker for relatively cheap.

>>118319

That's disappointing. Depressing.

>>118319

OP here. On race mixing:

Microchimerism: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/7676297_Male_microchimerism_in_women_without_sons_Quantitative_assessment_and_correlation_with_pregnancy_history

Now the amount of male cells per 100 000 is 0 to 20. This means that they can't possibly be inherited from grandparents, as in, a grandmother had a son and then the daughter carried some of the older brother's cells onto her own daughter (without any son or abortions of a male fetus). When looking at those that have induced abortions we find a high likelihood for male cells in their body. A woman that has an abortion is more likely to sleep with more men, and clearly she's risking pregnancy by doing so without a condom, as otherwise she would not have to have an abortion. A number of these women, that have had no abortion and no son, and no brother, still have male cells in the body.

This can only occur from microchimerism. There is no other explanation, as those with spontaneous abortions do not have the same probability of microchimerism (they have less than half the chance of it occurring).

So just as an individual "remembers their first" (especially women), and knowing that the emotional and social impression lasts their lifetime, we can conclude that every woman will never be free of the taint of another man. This happens to men but to a much less severe degree. Thus man whores are of course trash, but female whores are even lower.

Now maybe you want to fuck filth. There is no one stopping you from fucking literal animals. If you live on your own, no one knows what you do in the privacy of your home. And if you can get away with it, you may murder and rob and destroy. There is nothing stopping a person from immorality except consequences, and conscience. When the only reality is immediate experience then anything goes, I suppose. The capacity for genius is dwarfed (due to its perhaps recessive nature and thus difficulty) by the capacity for absolute braindead retarded sub-human degeneracy. It's easy to drive into oncoming traffic. It's difficult to go 80 years without dying living a somewhat free life. It's easy to be diseased and a burden. It's difficult to be clean, healthy and to relieve burdens. It is easy to be manipulated and brainwashed or controlled and wrong about things. It is difficult to figure things out, think for yourself, and be right.

Our genes include many recessive ones that are lost by race mixing. One does not continue the pursuit of whiteness by race mixing. One does not honor their ancestors, one does not purify and cultivate blood and soil, one does not push the interests of their race forward and onward. One must shit on their own race to race mix. Many genes working together are lost, some only meaningful in tandem with others.

Perhaps one day it will be easy to do all the right things. In certain situations it definitely is. In certain environments it definitely is. But this is because of the groundwork of your blood, the pressures to do right from outside that have existed for millennia, and the knowledge and skills gained over your lifetime in civilization.

For more check out the Race Realism thread >>>/pnd/20966

It has many many many more red pills on race mixing, most of them about the offspring, behavioral studies and genetics though.

I wanted to speak on some of the sentiment of it and also my take on micro-chimerism since it's a bit more difficult to interpret the data (well) than other studies.

>>116528

>>116562

>>116527

reputable sources say there is no way to reliably trigger yellowstone's eruption

>>115982

Change AZ to Green based on zero gun control laws and zero permits needed. Plus everyone here is fed up with niggers, even the spics are getting vocal against nigger protests.

>>116004

I just moved to Houston and Texas would be an ideal place if you were really only interested in buying a big house and have some skill that is needed for oil and gas or medical services. I still have some exploration left to do but I'd recommend Idaho and those surrounding states before I'd recommend Texas. If you're up for an epic vacation, you should DEFINITELY come here and see the Houston Rodeo, San Antonio, Austin and grab some Bucc-es, but probably don't live here.

Pros:

- Texas is an economic powerhouse.

- If you like to garden you'll have tons of sun and water here if you're clever about it.

- If you like to road trip, you'll never get bored.

- Most relaxed gun laws next to Kansas.

Cons:

- Because Texas is an economic powerhouse it looks like a giant shopping mall where the architect and zoning board were smoking weed when they designed it. Have you ever vacationed next to an oil refinery or had a relaxing dinner next to an overpass for a 12 lane interstate highway? You can here!

- The meme of "cheap and plentiful land" is dead. The only cheap land is in west Texas and that is all desert and human traffickers. 10 or 20 acres just outside a city is as much as a 4 bed, 3 bathroom house with a carport and swimming pool in a nice neighborhood. So you're better off just buying the house.

- Again, most land is already privately owned so if you want to go offroading, dirtbiking, plinking with a long rifle or just GTFO and have a walk through the woods there is no federal land you'll have a right to be on. You can camp in a Texas state park but you won't find one of those trailheads sitting on the side of the road like you would in the Blue Ridge Mountains or the Sawtooths of Idaho. It's miles and miles and miles of tractor trailer stops and ranches. For comparison when I was in Boise you could drive 15 minutes and be next to a creek bed with crystal clear water to take a dip, clear your mind and be with nature. Or drive 2 hours and you'll be next to forests that look like something from a movie. This is not the case in Texas if you're a nature enthusiast, you have to pay for everything and it's usually not that great.

- Don't expect "southern hospitality." It's almost as brutish and unwelcoming as the northeast I was trying to escape.

tl;dr if you're a white person, move to Idaho, Montana, Appalachia, Pennsylvania or a surrounding state. You'll be much healthier and keep your sanity.

>>120264

Read my blog..I mean post. >>121183

It sounds like you just want freedom. I'd strongly recommend the pacific northwest, Montana or some of the middle states like Colorado, Utah, Iowa, etc.

You can do everything you said on your own property and contrary to popular belief you can actually grow some fruit trees in the north as long as you're not living on a mountain or something.

I tried to escape the cold by moving to the south but tbh the cold is HEALTHY. Not just for white people too. All people can benefit from a nordic cycle, but they're usually too afraid to try something new.

The easiest way to get into the USA is to either marry, work or military. You can talk to a recruiter and here and they might have a way to get you citizenship if you can speak english fairly well, pass an ASVAB, background check and give 4 years of service.

If you have a college degree find a company that needs your skill set and come over on an H1B visa. During that time work on getting citizenship. It will take you years but during that time you can save money for a house.

OP your map is flawed in several ways. I have spent years perfecting where the perfect location to bunker down and start self-reliant communities would be within the continental US.

The fact of the matter is that the Ozarks of MO, AR, and OK is the single best place to be. I've made spreadsheets detailing this stuff to the county level and have several maps concerning related statistics. I will try to post them later when I have access to the device on which they are stored. But to summarize

>Nuclear reactors, launch sites, and other targets must of war and prone to radioactive fallout must be avoided

<This excludes everything east of the Mississippi, and most of the Great White North

>Landlock concerns only applies to areas w/o access to Mississippi navigable waterways

<so stop worrying SO much about the ocean

>Arability and access to unpolluted surface and ground water matters

<This excludes most of the heartland plains

>Susceptibility to natural disasters matters - hurricane prone states, tornado prone counties, places that sit on huge fault lines, places prone to (super)volcanism or flooding are not suitable for a lasting stable self-reliant community.

<This excludes the gulf coast, the Northwest, and the flat landscapes of tornado alley

>Availability of low $/acre matters - we need to maximize the ability of all racialists to join the community. Maximum $2k/acre

<This excludes cities, suburbs, and land prime for industrial farming

>Availability of private non-Jew financing for land matters

<We cannot allow our very ownership of the land to be controlled by Jewish banks

>Defensible terrain matters

<They will come for us eventually

>Religiosity matters

<Only a people grounded in some kind of tradition can be converted to our cause

>Family court tendencies matter

<We cannot allow women to lord over us

>Distance from population dense areas matter <We cannot be allowed to be overrun by niggers and leftists who have half a brain and half a tank of gas when calamity/collapse inevitably breaks down US society

>Homogeneity matters

<Obviously

>Health laws matter

<We cannot allow the Jew to forcibly poison or feminize our children

>Homeschooling or availability of acceptable private education matter

<We cannot allow our children to be brainwashed

>Distance from cities, but opposite

<We need to be close enough to commute and win minds, but remote enough to avoid the horde

>Building code enforcement/existence

<We need to build structures that are resilient and cheap. These tend to violate code in one way or another

There is more, but these are just what is missing from your examination off the top of my head. You should get a copy of Joel Skousen's "Strategic Relocation." It is a good starting point, but fails to take into account Yellowstone, weakening magnetic fields, etc. I recommend supporting this author financially, but if you must, there are pirated PDFs floating around and easily found with joogle.

Basically, if your analysis is leaving the Ozark area as anything but ideal, your metrics are incomplete or wrong.

>>122853

< Nuclear reactors, launch sites, and other targets must of war and prone to radioactive fallout must be avoided

Radioactive fallout doesn't last very long.

Nuclear reactors automatically shut down if cut off.

>>115988

you are aware of the water collection restrictions in the Mountain West, right?

>>122970

Utah is the only one with a meaningful restriction on the books, and even then you can literally just ignore it because no one can stop you.

>>123166

If you're looking for a really good, hyper-autistic book about this, buy "Strategic Relocation" by Joel Skousen. It's incredibly detailed and more autistic than you could ever imagine being in nitpicking and hyper analyzing every single state based on factors as simple as weather to potential nuclear targets and even routes of escape from a regional mass casualty event (i.e. earth quake, CBRN, 9/11 style event).

It's $30 on amazon but it's worth it. It's not light reading either, mountains of information, but it's got a reference section on a state by state basis to laser focus on a region and it's already on its 5th edition.

>>122853

lmao I didn't even read this. What this guy says >>123166

>>122853

Any suggestions of places to visit in the Ozarks? I've wanted to visit Hot Sprinks AR and it's about 3 hours away from me. The plains are really magical too, I had to drive through them when I was moving and I caught a thunderstorm and it was the most epic thunderstorm I've ever seen, it was incredible.

>>123279

>>122853

OP here.

Since you two both suggest the same book I'll check it out.

Arkansas is inbred as fuck though.

This entire discussion has been occurring for decades now. Waiting for the eventual destruction of the US, which will never happen. Whites will go extinct by 2200 across the world. Meanwhile racial aware whites are small island pockets in a sea of brown and shitlibs. We have to get to somewhere manageable and worthwhile. Which is also far enough away to not provoke the ire of the Jewish elite. This is why Rhodesia failed, the non-whites around them starved them out. Especially after the Portuguese were horrifically wiped out by Communists.Confederate separatism is foolishness, especially given the fact that the South might as well be a new region of Mexico in some areas. New England is too resource poor and close to the New York and Toronto elite to work out. There is already a movement occuring there under the autist who runs the New Albion project, needless to say I think that these projects to make a conservative area in New England or much worse (haha) in Vermont or S. Carolina will fail miserably.

Let Harold Covinginton speak for himself:

>twelve million Whites, give or take, plus a rather younger median age of population than you’ll find elsewhere on the continent, which is very important. The White population of Florida and Arizona, for example, is overwhelmingly geriatric. Twelve million in the Homeland is a lot of people, but with hard propaganda work by an active and fanatically dedicated minority, enough of them can be convinced to join us to provide local bases for incoming settlement. Contrast that to trying to work around a population of almost 300 million people, in many places majority non-White, on a continent this size, wherein we are totally and utterly powerless and scattered to the four winds. This is the primary advantage to the Northwest concept: reducing the problem to manageable proportions, to something solvable, cutting back the goal to one which is attainable. For almost seventy years, we have harbored a bizarre collective illusion that through some unfathomable means which no one ever seems able to explain, we will somehow win back the whole North American continent all at once and cause millions of nonWhites simply to vanish in a puff of smoke, without any effort, and certainly without the mass bloodshed such a project would in fact involve.

Face it, we are a tiny portion of a huge sea of people. Waiting for the collapse, the apocalypse, siege, or Jesus to come back is foolish. Nationalists have a knack for talking but not walking. This content reminds of Mason's siege from the 1980s or civil war ii from the 90s. Matthew Heimfart also was enough of a genius to think that some rednecks in a trailer fortress could fight against the most powerful military in human history..

>What Is A Community? The NF defines a White

Nationalist community in the Homeland as any area with a minimum of twelve (12) non-dysfunctional adult White Nationalists, living within half an hour’s drive of one another, who are aware of each other’s existence, and who regularly meet and interact personally, not on the internet. Nationalist communities will eventually serve as the foundation for everything the NF does. They will be accomplished to some degree through local recruiting within the Homeland, but primarily through the

relocation of the better elements of the existing racially conscious White population to the Pacific Northwest. Community-building will be an ongoing project from this point on, and will continue even after political independence is achieved. Racially conscious White immigrants coming into the Homeland will hereafter be referred to as Incomers, to differentiate them from native-born Northwesterners and

organic migrants (see below.)

>What Is A Unit? A Northwest Front unit is a group of at least three (3) non-dysfunctional adult White Nationalists who are resident in the Homeland, who live within half an hour’s drive from one another, and who act in concert to achieve the goals of the Party and bring the Republic into existence. Units are organized in the “Trouble Trio” format detailed later on in this manual. What Is A Contact? A Northwest Front contact is a single individual, resident within the Homeland, who agrees to allow his or her name and contact information including a physical mailing address to be published and distributed to interested parties. The contact agrees to assist incoming settlers relocating into their area of the Northwest, and also engages in political and other activities on behalf of the Party to bring the Republic into existence.

https://www.jrbooksonline.com/PDFs/White%20Book%205.pdf

>>123386

The problem you're going to face is the automatic assumption that "rural = conservative, urban = liberal". If, however, you've ever been to a small town in East Texas or rural areas in Ohio, you'll find some of the most leftist liberals you've ever met. Those places are basically owned by Unions and are invariably Democrat. The US cannot be "balkanized".

>>115982

>NH

<shit

Literally one of the safest, Whitest states with some of the best gun laws. You're shit.

>>123594

>The US cannot be "balkanized".

Well it sure as fuck can't survive in its current state.

>>123601

Exactly, however the breakup will be meaningless if we are isolated, alone, and without organization in a sea of 300 million people. After 2030, when the demographics flip, I could imagine power lines shutting down. Dams exploding due to terrible infrastructure, and a general degrading of society as robots drive the last jobs out of circulation.

>>123601

It can and it will because the US was built on change. We have always adapted and have never catered to the whims of fascist fee-fees.

>>123610

It's dead right now.

>>123594

Being in a union doesn't mean you like niggers.

>>123610

except literally everybody in america pre ww2 would be considered racist, facist ect by today's standards

>>121187

i don't think i can go to the military, I'm 28 and have arthritis. i all ready did 5 year in my country's military. i think maybe the option is to save money and apply for a green card.

>>123629

wrong

>>123916

Maneuverbrand sounds terrible. Maneuver team, Firebrand.

There was a lot of attention to Idaho when video of Coeur D'Alene guys walking around fully strapped went up and at that time the word was that Idaho was full, go away, limited opportunities there due to harsh inhospitable terrain etc etc. Or was this just hyperbole?

>>123916

OP, the squads described there were created by a guy who frankly has more experience than you in Ireland, Rhodesia, and the US military. Again, a fight for the entire US is lost. Fighting county by county is foolish because most of these rural areas are emptying,aged, or becoming shitlib with a huge population of urban suburbanites. FURTHERMORE, the reason why rural areas aren't top priority is because people can identify you easily as a migrant. Especially if you come all of a sudden without any reason. Creating bases of these units in cities will serve a purpose as the NW party members continue to infiltrate government, healthcare, and commercial institutions. Or create their own to support OTHER members coming in. The goal is to have as many people in the NW who are racially aware as possible in order to:

1. blend in with the majority white population so as to not get spotted, the most basic idea of guerrilla warfare.

2. convince and win over the white natives and bring the majority of the population over with the eventual succession of the region.

Meanwhile there is one remaining region that is perfect for our strategic interests and is in a far manageable territory..

Again, if this were to pan out. The territory must be within at least 24 hour driving distance. This is why your idea will fail because the tiny amount of people in these isolated counties will not have enough manpower or firepower to fight against the most powerful (weapons-wise) military in human history!

MOVE TO THE NW HOMELAND

>>124035

There are regions in the homeland that have good access to jobs. Remember these are some of the last pure white areas in the US. Of course there are jobs, but as places become more shit people will struggle to come to the last wealthy and prosperous region in this failed Republic.

Again. Those squads were created explicitly with the NW territory in mind. Not anywhere else. This strategy you propose could have been valid in the 40's during the time of the silver shirts. Or even in the 60s. But not today, when the demographics have gone this bad. Especially if it takes another decade to organize. A revolt like this will simply not work and will be quashed easily. The 2020s are the last decade where we National Socialists can organize. Let's not waste our time.

You seem like a sharp guy. I'd recommend, in fact challenge you, to look at northwestfront.org and inquire with us. Our goal is not to fight and die but to live.

>>123916

>>123695

Kentucky and Tennessee are fine outside Louisville, Memphis and Nashville. Great gun laws (especially KY), decent tax regimes except for property taxes in the listed cities. And lots of pro whites. Tennessee is basically three states, with east Tennessee being the most based, middle TN second and west TN more like your typical Mississippi Delta demographic the closer you get to Memphis.

The two regions, in my view, that whites should be grouping up socially and economically are the Mountain west (MT, WY, ID mainly) and the upper south/lower midwest (IN, OH, MI, TN, KY and southern IL). Don't actually move to southern IL, but culturally they are more similar to IN and KY than the Chicago region.

>>125242

1. There will be no happening. You fundamentally don't understand how the final collapse of human civilization will play out, which is why whites have already lost and why we won't fight back.

2. ACTUALLY mobile? As in moving around? Not. You're not going to be able to get fuel safely. Every gas station will be a stronghold until the gas runs out, and even afterward because of the effort put into fortifying them in the first place. An electric car will take days or weeks to charge for a day's driving–if at all–using a series of portable solar panels and the voltage they can provide. A moving vehicle in a social collapse is a massive target. "Hey, that guy has fuel. He must also have other supplies. Let's put a bullet through his windshield and take everything he has." They can see you coming, because you're the only thing moving and you'll have your lights on at night. They can hear you coming, because they probably don't have their own generators. Fuel acquisition itself probably won't make that much of a problem, of course. You'll just run out and that's where you'll have to set up camp. Hope you're in a woods, or at least somewhere that you can set up some brush cover.

>>125253

I'm another anon. But I want to ask:

How the final collapse of human civilization will play out?

>>125253

Get a bicycle you lazy burgers. Easy to hide too when mad max niggus come to scavange hunting for preys along the roads.

>>125262

By the looks of things and how everything is headed in the world atm. It is all becoming a huge communist melting pot all countries. Seeing this pattern you just have to look at history about what happened in communist countries.

But this time in a larger scale. Basically those at the top will drink the finest wine as those who are rest of the 99.5% of in the pyramid will fight in tribal wars as is happening and starting in Europe now and USA. You don't see it much in the news but clan wars are already happening in Europe and escalating quickly.

Knowing this and that the power like nuclear plants are being removed, yes many european countries have insuffcient powersupply now, and they refuse to reinstante nuclear powerplants due to leftist ideals"communist" so people will become more savage to get materialistic needs. Small scale wars and conflicts as the top 0.5% or even smaller percentage rulers will smile and watch the peasants play for them as planned.

>>133912

It would be .001%. Upper class is competition and undermines the ultra elite .001%. Too many people that have a problem with child sacrifice, enslavement and genocide in the 0.5%.

The South is only 1/3rd black (Georgia has a higher number) and the whites there are of the highest quality. Everybody saying in threads such as this that the South should be abandoned, become a black ethnostate or what have you are extremely misinformed, the high quality soil and the frequency of people like us compared to the rest of the US population makes it one of the better places to do things like this.

>>121183

Texas is invaded. Bye bye Texas.

>>121187

Utah will be the heart of the Zionist Evangelical force. They turned against a pro-White religion a long time ago. I'd be very careful with their data-mining centers.

Sheitan hides in the cities.

>>116107

idk why idiots on this board think its better for white families to live isolated in a chocolate city than in a no-go zone with 50 other white families

>>125253

>An electric car will take days or weeks to charge for a day's driving–if at all–using a series of portable solar panels and the voltage they can provide.

You say that like it's completely useless. I'm pretty sure early settlers would've killed for an electric car and solar panels, even with the shortcomings

>>116140

If only we could get all the Jews to return to there holy land, and let Iran have its fun.

>>116407

A good old pogrom is the only solution.