>>8177
Thanks man. It's a really good and quick read, only took like two hours. Although most of it seems like stuff I could've skimmed over. A quick 'readers guide' would be:
1) The first part of the book talking about Chilean marttyrs, etc is good for easing into the topic, but if you just want to learn about UFOs then it's not too important and can be skipped. I recommend reading it because it's pretty /comfy/.
2) You're going to find a lot of parts about u-boats, there isn't a lot of important information here; if you already know about stuff like 'phantom submarines' then it can be skipped. That's not to say that there isn't interesting information, so if you have the time feel free to read it - you're never wasting time when you're reading Serrano.
3) Around 60ish pages in he starts talking about UFO suicide missions to mars and a bunch of pictures of UFOs, but provides next to no evidence. I'd recommend just skimming for some of the useful bits.
4) There's a couple random essays at the end. At first it just repeats the beginning of the book, and the rest are completely off-topic. If you're just going in for UFO info then it's safe to skip them, but it's still fairly enjoyable.
All in all it's a pretty good book. Normally with this subject you hear tidbits of evidence for German UFOs, but even then it still never really 'clicks' in your head. After reading a bunch of evidence in such a condensed manuscript it really 'clicked' in my head. The one thing that irks me about Serrano's works is that the only notes he gives are on things easily researchable, like "kalki." But then you get extremely obscure shit that he just says without providing any evidence, and no search engines show anything up, and it's kind of hard to just take his word for it over such a big topic. One day I might try adding citations to his works, but so much of his works are untranslated, or not in pdf format, so that would be difficult. Anyways. I rate the book 7/10. It's really nice to see so much concise, good information. But the lack of citations and unnecessary content ends up taking up a lot of time. In this regard it's not as bad as the final avatar, which regularly goes on unrelated sourceless tangents. (although it's still my favorite of his works) It's also not peak Serrano because it has almost no esoteric knowledge to it; due to the book's nature, it deals almost entirely with material things. It might seem unfair to get annoyed at unrelated tangents at one minute and then criticize a book for not talking about 'esoteric' thing, but that can be explained easily. One is a complaint I would have about a book; the other is a complaint I would have about a book by Miguel Serrano.