[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / random / 93 / biohzrd / hkacade / hkpnd / tct / utd / uy / yebalnia ]

/p/ - Photography

Needs more borkeh
Name
Email
Subject
REC
STOP
Comment *
File
Password (Randomized for file and post deletion; you may also set your own.)
Archive
* = required field[▶Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.
Embed
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Oekaki
Show oekaki applet
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Options

Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webp,webm, mp4, mov, swf, pdf
Max filesize is16 MB.
Max image dimensions are15000 x15000.
You may upload5 per post.


The only contemporary consumer gear thread (feel free to make new threads about rare technology though). New threads of similar matter will be deleted.
Discuss rules.
- Discord channel.

File: 1442590663182.jpg (1.4 MB,2600x800,13:4,DSC03697.jpg)

 No.601 [Last50 Posts]

Post your film gear

____________________________
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.604

File: 1442614537265.jpg (507.01 KB,2500x2500,1:1,serveimage.jpg)

This is all I use. I picked it up just because the viewfinder is supposed to be more accurate than a standard Holga. I wish there was a Holga SLR out there or something, though.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.609

>>604

You can mount holga lenses to an SLR. Holga sells mounts for both canon and nikkon.

http://photojojo.com/store/awesomeness/holga-dslr-lens/

Also, what do you think of the holga tlr? Ive checked it out but havent tried it. Is it worth getting for the better composition ability? I assume the lens is still shit.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.610

File: 1442728089413.jpg (1.25 MB,3264x2448,4:3,image.jpg)

Holga 135 pinhole

Diana 120

Leica MP with 35mm summicron

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.611

File: 1442728685930.jpg (1.56 MB,3264x2448,4:3,image.jpg)

Holy shit. Haven't touched the Diana in five years and there was film in it! Sweet! Gonna develop this shit and see what was on it!

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.612

>>611

Fujifilm stopped selling C-41 in 2010. This film is at least 5 years old.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.613

Okay im gonna load this baby up into the development tank and see what I get. No idea what I was doing 5 years ago with this diana, hopefully the shots arent destroyed from years of neglect!

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.614

>>613

So I was just about to load this into the tank and realized it was a roll of color film and I dont have chemicals for that. So decided ill take it to the photo lab and have them develop it for me. Heading there now, lets see what happens.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.615

So just got back from photo lab. They said they cant do a one hour development on the film. I explained that it was at least 5 years old, so they are going to send it to another lab that specializes in developing out-of-date film. I wont get it back for two weeks. Ill update this thread with scans when I get it back!

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.616

guys i dont get whats the rage about shooting shitty lomo pics with a shitty plasticky body and window glass lens. somebody clear this up for me

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.617

>>616

Lomo is just modern day pictorialism. It started in early 2000 as a rebellion of the new consumer digital cameras that started showing up back then.

Personally I started with lomo around 2007 because it was a cheap way into learning film using a camera with limited functions. The limited functions help learn the physics behind photography. Cheap is good because beginners take shitty photos anyways.

Do you have a lomo camera?

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.618

>>616

By the way, poster >>610 has a 5000 dollar camera and 5000 dollar lens under those two lomo pieces of trash.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.619

>>601

What lens do you have on the leica?

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.620

>>619

50/2 summitar

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.621

>>617

If you wanna learn film photgraphy just get a ae1 or even a canon rangefinder. those go for extremely cheap. how can you learn a skill when everything you shoot is blurry and dark...

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.622

>>621

That was almost 10 years ago. I bought a holga on a whim and shot a few rolls before upgrading to a ricoh 35mm slr.

You ever shoot holga?

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.623

>>622

nope, i dont wanna walk away from a shot i know i couldve got on a proper slr, when shooting with a holga

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.624

>>623

What if you are wanting the light leaks and imperfections from the holga? Would you still shoot SLR then modify in ye olde photoshoppe?

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.625

>>624

>light leaks and imperfections

literally the first time i shot with my leica i fucked up and accidentally opened up the bottom cover and exposed about 4 frames. if you want shitty film grain just buy some overpriced lomo film. If you want more just soak your film in some shit and vomit, expose it and voila, lomo!

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.626

>>625

I get light leaks with my leica sometimes too. I developed a roll today and 4-5 frames were destroyed by light leak. I didnt open the camera, but maybe one of my noob friends wanted to see inside the camera when I wasnt looking.

How do you find your leica? Ive got the MP and really like the aesthetics of shooting with it. Its a sexy machine.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.627

>>626

idk man i dont really like the weight.. the aesthetics are ofcourse /fa/ but the rangefinding can be annoying sometimes and the lack of a light meter is really annoying... one of my guests of my dad just gave it to me when i was small... and we kinda kept it.....

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.628

>>627

I really like the weight. It feels like I could drop it and it wouldnt break, and that is reassuring to me.

The rangefinder takes a bit of practice, but its really not too hard. Its easy enough to shoot with leica from the hip as long as your depth of field is big enough for your target.

You got any shots that youve taken with your leica? I want to see :D

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.629

>>628

nah man i would never drop a 1k camera... just the thought of it.....

the little yellow box is just hard to figure out sometimes...

yeah ive got some prints but i dont have a scanner or anything...

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.630

>>629

Use your phone to take a picture of the prints. I just ordered a new enlarger to replace the ghetto enlarger that I built myself haha.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.631

>>629

You print yourself?

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.632

>>630

i can take some snaps later yeah

>>631

nah i send them in to a print shop to develop and enlarge

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.633

>>632

Cheers, looking forward to seeing your snaps.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.634

>>633

cmon man dont be a wank post some of urs too

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.635

>>634

Alright, I just scanned a bunch. Give me a few minutes to invert them and scale down to web size.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.636

File: 1442767894008.jpg (171.11 KB,1000x666,500:333,IMG_2914.jpg)

Okay ill start dumping as I process them. Sorry there is a bit of dog hair on some of the scans haha.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.637

File: 1442768043387.jpg (179.57 KB,666x1000,333:500,IMG_2916.jpg)

This horse tried to bite me a few seconds after I took this shot.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.638

>>637

why is this one so dark? somethings off

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.639

File: 1442768640027.jpg (185.58 KB,1000x666,500:333,IMG_2924.jpg)

Marsh landscape

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.640

>>638

Maybe looks dark on your screen. Looks okay on my mac retina though. Prints look okay too.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.641

>>640

i mean the sky looks super dim

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.642

>>641

Ah! I used a red filter. Red filters make a bright blue sky look black.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.643

File: 1442769183766.jpg (164.32 KB,666x1000,333:500,IMG_2929.jpg)

Heres a more dramatic example of that dark sky from the red filter.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.644

>>643

whats the practical use though?

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.645

>>644

It makes red become white and blue becomes black.

Practical use is to make white clouds pop out on a sunny day. You can also use it to accent highlights that are red or blue.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.646

>>645

I'm guessing on color film everything will have a red tint

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.647

File: 1442770078217.jpg (201.54 KB,1000x666,500:333,IMG_2912.jpg)

This tree is dreamy. I didnt use red filter for this.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.648

>>643

which b/w film did u use

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.649

>>646

Yeah the red filter can only really be used for black and white photography. I used it once to take a photo of my dog in color and it looked like my dog was a demon hound from hell.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.650

>>648

Most of these were with kodak tri-x 400.

What film do you use? Im thinking about switching to 100 iso or lower for more crispyness.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.651

>>650

i shoot color cause i have no idea how to shoot b/w. I just pick up the cheapest color film to be honest, im only learning at this moment and just wanna play around

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.652

>>651

Shooting B&W is all about controlling the light. Once you can master light, you will make good shots.

Upload some shots, lets see :)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.653

>>647

Did you use infrared film for this?

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.654

>>653

No, I used kodak tri-x 400 for this. I think I took this shot around noon at f/8 and a 1/500 shutter speed.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.655

File: 1442776363330-0.jpg (376.96 KB,1616x1080,202:135,DSC03698.JPG)

File: 1442776363332-1.jpg (299.47 KB,1616x1080,202:135,DSC03699.JPG)

File: 1442776363332-2.jpg (439.1 KB,1616x1080,202:135,DSC03701.JPG)

File: 1442776363332-3.jpg (390.77 KB,1616x1080,202:135,DSC03702.JPG)

File: 1442776363332-4.jpg (407.06 KB,1616x1080,202:135,DSC03703.JPG)

>>652

sorry for shitty quality and reflections, worked hard at the angle to conceal face

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.656

File: 1442776431299-0.jpg (385.2 KB,1616x1080,202:135,DSC03704.JPG)

File: 1442776431301-1.jpg (439.1 KB,1616x1080,202:135,DSC03705.JPG)

File: 1442776431301-2.jpg (335.74 KB,1616x1080,202:135,DSC03706.JPG)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.657

>>609

>You can mount holga lenses to an SLR. Holga sells mounts for both canon and nikkon.

I bought lenses before I decided to go with the real thing. I only played around with them a bit before I just opted to go with film for the more imperfect film look with heavy light leaks.

I can't really see myself going back to digital until the day when the idiosyncrasies of film can be flawlessly emulated, and maybe that'll never even happen.

>Also, what do you think of the holga tlr? Ive checked it out but havent tried it. Is it worth getting for the better composition ability? I assume the lens is still shit.

From what I've heard, it's more accurate horizontally than a standard Holga camera, but I can't really compare it as this is the only one I've used. The lens is still plastic, but I think there might be a glass version out. It's also worth noting that it's not a true TLR, the top lens is only used as a viewfinder.

>>616

Toy cameras are all about the beautiful, dreamy-looking aesthetic. The problem comes with the Lomographic Society protogs pushing their "don't think, just shoot" philosophy and encouraging people to throw all rules of composition out the window.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.658

>>657

Lomo society makes their money selling absurdly over-priced lomo film. Of course they encourage "don't think, just shoot". It is better for their bank.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.659

>>655

>>656

These were shot with your leica? They look fantastic. Looks like you travel a lot.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.660

>>659

yeah most of them were from my trip to reykjavik, i like the accidental light leak on the ice alot, makes it look like lava

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.661

>>657

>protogs

I'm not even sure what insult I was trying to type here.

>>658

Yup, it's largely about making money. On one hand, they've done a lot to popularize lo-fi photography and are keeping film alive, but on the other, their stuff costs an arm and a leg, their marketing is stupid, and they aren't worth buying from if you can find what you're looking for elsewhere.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.662

>>661

f-a-g-s becomes protogs, haha.

Lomography is good for teaching teens and shit that something exists as an alternative to digital photography. As these teens get older and wiser, they will buy proper equipment and start getting normal priced film.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.663

>>661

Pictorialsm was a huge movement for many decades with a very similar aesthetic to the lomography movement. Pictorialism was mainly killed by Ansel Adam's hyper realistic photography.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.664

>>663

Well we've already got hyper realistic photography now. What is going to come along and kill lomography?

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.665

>>664

Collodion process

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.666

>>665

How the hell will collodion process kill lomography? Are hipsters going to start printing on daguerreotypes?

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.667

>>666

nice trips, also, why not?

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.668

>>662

Oh, that explains it.

>>663

Yeah, a lot of black-and-white toy camera shots tend to have a pictorialist feeling to them.

>>664

They'll probably just learn to exist side-by-side.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.669

>>668

I actually checked out that collodion process. It looks fairly easy. I might make a setup for that after I buy a house and have a dedicated space.

Have you made any tintypes?

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.693

>>669

No, I haven't even tried developing my own film yet.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.709

>>693

Why not? Its easy and cheap.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.711

>>709

I'm still trying to get the look I want first. The foam popped out of my Holga, so I stuck a piece of cardboard in there, and that basically killed my light leaks. I sent in a roll not too long ago where I was using nothing but a little piece of paper, but I haven't gotten it back yet. The roll didn't seem too fat when I sent it in, so I'm not sure if it'll look the way I want it to. After that, I'm going to try cross processing.

I'll probably try developing my own pictures next year, since I'm pretty much done with photography until next spring.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.713

>>669

Don't forget to use goggles and gloves

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.715

>>711

You should spend the winter learning how to make prints from your negatives. Prints are really enjoyable to make IMO.

>>713

I dont use protection with normal B&W chemicals, but I suppose I should with a collodion setup.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.716

>>711

Upload your photos! I want to see your holga shots

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.733

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.736

>>716

>>716

I'm not sure an enlarger and scanner are worth it right now given my lack of satisfaction with the quality of shots I've been taking.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.737

>>736

Holga does not equal quality. If you want quality shots, then learn about proper exposure and get a real camera not a toy camera.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.742

>>737

I'm not the least bit interested in high fidelity, my shots are just inconsistent. I have a lot of throwaway shots in each roll (probably due to misjudging distance and shooting with slow film), and my last one seemed kind of underexposed even though it was taken on a sunny day. I'm considering getting some 200 or 400 ISO film and just saving the 100 ISO stuff I've been using for only the brightest days.

I've read it takes about ten rolls for someone to figure out what they're doing on cameras like these, and I've only gotten four or five back, so I think I just need to play around more.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.747

>>742

Problem with holga is that you dont have any fine control over the camera. After 10 rolls you should figure out that you are just wasting your money and need to get a real camera that is more than a one-trick-pony. Its easy enough to get holga results from post processing, why waste your perfectly good shots with a permanent shit filter?

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.748

>>747

One roll of 120 film: 5 bucks

Processing fees: 5 bucks

Printing fees: 10 bucks

Ten rolls is 200 bucks. Its a waste of money for shooting holga.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.749

File: 1443333898730.jpg (128.39 KB,800x533,800:533,5PWoBMd.jpg)

>>748

IMO if youre gonna shoot 120, at least get a mamiya for a few hundred bucks.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.776

>>747

I'm not interested in anything other than the toy camera aesthetic, and I'd prefer the look right out of the camera if possible. To shoot with a "nice" camera would be counterproductive for what I'm trying to do. I might as well just learn to work within the limitations until of the camera I can consistently get the results I'm trying to achieve.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.838

>>776

Can you describe what you are trying to do? I want to see more of your holga shots

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.881

File: 1443474138281.jpg (331.66 KB,1158x1170,193:195,1.jpg)

>>838

Alright, here's a crappy scan of one of my favorite images I've taken to give you an idea of the kind of look I like. I have more, but I seem to be having trouble including them in one post.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.925

File: 1444542463589.jpg (589.1 KB,2977x2198,2977:2198,glorious.jpg)

Let's talk about the Olympus Trip 35 and similar cameras.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.929

>>925

damn thats an old photo, at least 15 years no? did you recently just scan it?

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.979

File: 1445806243686.jpg (236.26 KB,600x400,3:2,fujigw690II.jpg)

Can I join the cool club now?

Where can I bulk B&W 120/220 on the cheep?

Who should I support? Kodak? Fuji? Illford?

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.981

>>979

You can get 120 for 5 dollars a roll on amazon if you buy in bulk packs.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.982

>>981

$5, can you link me. It's like $12 AUD a roll down under.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.984

>>982

Heres a package of 5 rolls for 25 dollars. Comes out to one roll per 5 dollars.

http://www.amazon.com/kodak-115-3659-Professional-Propack/dp/B0073HCE3O/

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.1649

Now we can post about gear autism again.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.



[Return][Go to top][Catalog][Nerve Center][Random][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[]
[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / random / 93 / biohzrd / hkacade / hkpnd / tct / utd / uy / yebalnia ]