[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / random / 93 / biohzrd / hkacade / hkpnd / tct / utd / uy / yebalnia ]

/p/ - Photography

Needs more borkeh

Name
Email
Subject
REC
STOP
Comment *
File
Password (Randomized for file and post deletion; you may also set your own.)
Archive
* = required field[▶Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.
Embed
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Oekaki
Show oekaki applet
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Options

Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webp,webm, mp4, mov, swf, pdf
Max filesize is16 MB.
Max image dimensions are15000 x15000.
You may upload5 per post.


The only contemporary consumer gear thread (feel free to make new threads about rare technology though). New threads of similar matter will be deleted.
Discuss rules.
- Discord channel.

File: 25de006fd88e398⋯.jpg (38.79 KB,530x297,530:297,theoria apophasis.jpg)

 No.1570

I really do hope none of you fags ever get suckered into taking this guy seriously, or any other chump peddling "microcontrast" snake oil.

____________________________
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.1571

File: 7279d6c998edf52⋯.jpg (47.69 KB,800x534,400:267,download-5-1.jpg)

File: 8fd48596c9c19dc⋯.jpg (59.45 KB,800x534,400:267,download-4-1.jpg)

The shot on the left is taken by a "superior" lens while the shot on the right is taken by a "lifeless" lens.

>modern lenses are barely able reproduce the imperfect life despite heavy post-processing by the user. Of course, they were built to photograph in situations where the human eye cannot reach or recognize. Their rendering are often described as “digital” or “flat”.

>Notice the flat nose and head.

Well holy shit nigger, maybe if you didn't pick a vietnamese gook for a subject and didn't shoot her under highly diffuse lighting conditions maybe her nose wouldn't be so fucking flat.

Never take gear advice from self important assholes who can't shoot and unless you're a complete newfag you should know damn well that lighting trumps everything.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.1612

File: 88a7b796cdb45fe⋯.jpg (180.28 KB,800x534,400:267,fixed.jpg)

>>1571

fix the colors

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.1613

File: b220d8b11649869⋯.jpg (189.64 KB,800x534,400:267,8fd48596c9c19dcb3938932d17….jpg)

>>1612

Here's my take

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.1614

Those are two different focal length lenses also.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.1617

>>1570

I have no idea who this guy is. But given the cramped "studio", the easily-identifiable-product-placement-gear, his chins/physique, and the overall amateur-hour setup, I'm going to guess that he's an opinionated gearhead whose videos are all monologues-to-camera and he never ever talks about composition. He looks like a low-rent Ted Forbes, which is sad, because in the last few years Ted Forbes has become the low-rent Ted Forbes.

And I'll guess that this guy makes sure to tell people to "hit that like button" and "be sure to subscribe" and "make sure to click that bell".

And I'll further bet that 99% of his photos are creepy-guy-with-camera TFP shoots in his home studio with half-naked nervous girls a third of his age, and that he's never gotten up before dawn to shoot a sunrise landscape in his life, let alone gone on a hike anywhere.

And I'm 100% fucking sure that he posts multi-page screeds on dpreview forums. He just seems the type.

All this is just guesses though. I genuinely have no idea who he is.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.1618

File: 838a3e6002b0494⋯.gif (484.75 KB,161x161,1:1,1367536300614.gif)

>>1617

>All this is just guesses though. I genuinely have no idea who he is.

Well by all means allow me to fill you in.

Our dear friend the bald blob goes by the name "the angry photographer", he's earned this moniker by trash talking any and all new lens designs (in particular those by Sigma) that prioritize optical correction and light gathering ability over "microcontrast" and other subjective characteristics of rendition. He's also highly hostile in tone towards most camera manufacturers (except for Fujifilm which he's a huge fanboy of) of and when he's not ranting about gear he's out in his backyard taking pictures of random shit in his garden which he will post to flickr without any processing whatsoever or ranting about his latest theory on magnetism which literally no one in the world but him has a sound understanding of.

Oh and actually he detests "diaperreview". My bet is he was banned by them and got salty.

https://www.flickr.com/photos/134746128@N05/

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.1619

>>1618

Wow, he's even more of a loser than I thought. It takes a really special kind of asshole to get banned from "we specialize in opinionated assholes" dpreview.

I'm really out of the loop on youtube people. No great loss, it seems.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.1622

>>1619

There's some decent YT channels on photography but he isn't one of them.

Another one I'm a bit tired of is Kai. Fucking clickbait tier crap, half his videos are him running around Soho with his (apparent) boyfriend screwing around with a Leica like it was a Kodak fixed-lens.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.1627

>>1622

Yeah, Kai is ungodly irritating. To his credit, at least he actually goes outside and takes photos. Sad as it is, even that's more than most photographer-youtubers bother to do.

I've been looking around youtube this weekend for interesting photographers. There's a British dude named Thomas Heaton that caught my eye. He doesn't seem like a gearhead at all, his videos are typically about his in-the-field creative process, and he keeps videos down to 10-15 minutes. I'm not usually one for landscapes but I think I'll keep watching his stuff.

Another one I kinda-sorta like is a guy named Sean Tucker, another Brit. I appreciate the "focus on the art" approach he takes, and I love street work, but I think he needs to do some trimming during his production planning and video editing process. 20-25 minute long monologues-to-camera can get dull, even if the subject matter is very interesting.

But aside from them, I didn't find much. Clickbait and gearheads and meandering unscripted opinionated monologues-to-camera as far as the eye can see.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.1628

File: d9118b6fc478412⋯.png (80.12 KB,375x383,375:383,1435724346331.png)

>>1627

I have yet to find a single non-gear oriented photofag on jewtube that regularly produces quality content.

However, if you instead go looking for videography channels there's shitloads of good ones.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.1698

>>1628

>However, if you instead go looking for videography channels there's shitloads of good ones.

Quite true. Of course, video is their bread and butter. It's basically one skillset that those videographers learn and apply to all their projects, both the daily-bread work for hire, and their youtube channel. Photographers who want to present on youtube (or elsewhere) need to learn two somewhat-related but quite distinct skillsets, and a high level of skill in one doesn't always translate to the other.

Even in this age of technology, I'd argue that the superior format for the display of photographs is quality paper - either individual prints, or a big hardcover monograph.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.



[Return][Go to top][Catalog][Nerve Center][Random][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[]
[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / random / 93 / biohzrd / hkacade / hkpnd / tct / utd / uy / yebalnia ]