>>72933

roger muh fren

All 10 Boulder Colorado Victims Were White. It’s Time to End Anti-White Race Hate.

The following ten people perished in the recent shooting in Boulder, Colorado carried out by Ahmad Al-Issa. All of them appear to be white, but neither the media nor politicians have bothered to resurrect their anti-race-hate campaign that ensues when Black Lives Matter riot, or when Asians are murdered in Atlanta.

The victims include grocery store workers, local college graduates, medicare agents, a police officer, and an Orthodox Christian.

Today, The National Pulse calls on the political left and their media counterparts to stop the racial hatred they continue to perpetuate against white people, which doubtlessly led to these murders in Colorado.

Denny Strong, 20

Strong resided in Boulder, Colorado and had worked at the King Soopers grocery store since 2018. He described himself as a fan of planes, bikes, and motorcycles on social media and friends say he was training to be a pilot.

Rikki Olds, 25

Olds worked at the King Soopers grocery store. She went to high school in Lafayette, Colorado, and attended Front Range Community College.

‘We lost our beloved Rikki Olds to the monster who shot up the king soopers in Boulder CO yesterday may his rotten a** fry and burn in hell,’ her aunt Lori Olds said.

Tralona Bartkowiak, 49

Bartkowiak had recently gotten engaged and ran a small boutique focused on yoga and festival attire in Boulder.

Suzanne Fountain, 59

Fountain worked as a licensed Medicare agent and financial counselor.

Teri Leiker, 51

Leiker had worked at the store targetted in the attack for three decades, and her friends revealed working at the store was her “favorite thing to do.”

Since 2019, Leiker was dating a colleague, Clint, who survived the shooting.

“She loved going to work and enjoyed everything about being there,” friends added.

https://thenationalpulse.com/analysis/boulder-shooting-victims/

continued

>>72934 (me)

.pdf won't embed for me

>>72934

Grant Agreement between Swissmedic and Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation

.pdf

>>72936

All 10 Boulder Colorado Victims Were White. It’s Time to End Anti-White Race Hate.

Eric Talley, 51

The father of seven had served the Boulder Police Department since 2010.

“He loved his kids and his family more than anything,” said Talley’s father, Homer Talley.

“He was looking for a job to keep himself off of the front lines and was learning to be a drone operator. He didn’t want to put his family through something like this and he believed in Jesus Christ,” he added.

Kevin Mahoney, 61

Mahoney’s daughter revealed that her father had been killed in the shooting with a photo of him walking her down the aisle for her wedding with the caption “I am heartbroken to announce that my Dad, my hero, Kevin Mahoney, was killed in the King Soopers shooting in my hometown of Boulder, CO.”

‘My dad represents all things Love,” she added.

Lynn Murray, 62

Murray had two children and was a retired New York City magazine photo director whose clients included Cosmopolitan, Marie Claire, and Glamour. She relocated to Colorado to raise her children.

Her family noted she was at the grocery store to fill an Instacart order at the time of the shooting.

“I just want her to be remembered as just as this amazing, amazing comet spending 62 years flying across the sky,” her husband John urged.

Jody Waters, 65

Waters was a mother, grandmother, and rescue dog owner. She describes herself as a hiker and creative entrepreneur.

Neven Stanisic, 23

A graduate of Alameda West High School, Stanisic and his family “fled Bosnia 20 years ago for a better life in America,” according to leaders at Saint John the Baptist Serbian Orthodox Church in Lakewood.

“He was an amazing child,” said Ivana Petrovic, who along with her husband, Rev. Radovan Petrovic, have close ties with the family. “We’ve known the family ever since we became their spiritual father and mother here. He was a very good, shy, hardworking boy and one of those kiddos who listened to his parents the best.”

Stanisic’s Facebook showed him smiling with classmates and contained images of hand-drawn anime characters and the Assassin’s Creed video game series.

https://thenationalpulse.com/analysis/boulder-shooting-victims/

Yellen open to U.S. banks paying dividends, repurchasing stock

Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen said on Wednesday that U.S. banks look healthy enough to be allowed to pay dividends and repurchase stock, an updated view that reflects top economic officials’ growing confidence in the recovery from the coronavirus pandemic.

Yellen made her comments in a second day of testimony in Congress alongside Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell. The hearings are part of a quarterly economic update they are required to make. Asked by Senate Banking Committee Chairman Sherrod Brown if she opposed banks paying dividends and buying back stock, Yellen said she was previously opposed to bank stock buybacks, but financial institutions look healthier now and “should have some ability to, abiding by the rules, to make returns to shareholders.”

Yellen and Powell, in prepared remarks that mirrored those delivered on Tuesday before the House of Representatives Financial Services Committee, offered an optimistic outlook for the economy, fueled by expectations for continued progress against the pandemic due to vaccine rollouts and another $1.9 trillion of federal relief spending just getting underway. “It is going to be a very, very strong year in the most likely case,” Powell said in response to a senator’s question on the economic outlook. The U.S. economic recovery is evolving faster than expected, but still faces risks from the pandemic on one side and potential inflation on the other as massive fiscal support rolls through the system. The federal response to the crisis, including spending of about $5 trillion and considerable support from the U.S. central bank, set the stage for a rebound now taking hold as the COVID-19 vaccination program gains momentum and pandemic restrictions are lifted.

However, it remains unclear how quickly millions of still-unemployed workers will find their way back to jobs, whether the Fed can keep markets on an even keel amid rising prices and bond yields, and if initial progress against the pandemic can be sustained.

https://www.reuters.com/article/usa-economy-yellen-powell/yellen-open-to-u-s-banks-paying-dividends-repurchasing-stock-idUSL1N2LM1XZ

SAM061 USAF C-40B on approach for Laredo, TX from JBA depart

State Dept AC

Judicial Supremacy to Judicial Lunacy? A Judge Challenges the Supreme Court’s Supreme Folly

by Selwyn Duke March 23, 2021

“Our judges are as honest as other men, and not more so,” wrote Thomas Jefferson in 1820. “They have, with others, the same passions for party, for power, and the privilege of their corps.” While this is true, one Judge Laurence Silberman may be an exception.

Silberman, of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, emerged from relative obscurity recently when he penned a dissent in the case of Tah v. Global Witness Publishing, Inc. In this case, which involved defamation, Silberman went far beyond disagreeing with how the majority applied a 1964 “landmark” Supreme Court opinion, New York Times Co. v. Sullivan. He also challenged the very “notion of Supreme Court infallibility,” as one commentator put it.

In a nutshell, the ’64 opinion held that succeeding in a defamation claim required a plaintiff to prove not just that statements made publicly were false and damaging, but that they were motivated by malice (read more about the case here and here.) As a result, public officials basically stopped suing the media because, unlike in Britain, it’s now notoriously difficult to win a defamation case in the United States.

Silberman finds that troubling. But what bothers him even more is that, as he pointed out, “Justice Thomas has already persuasively demonstrated that New York Times was a policy-driven decision masquerading as constitutional law. As with the rest of the opinion, the actual malice requirement was simply cut from whole cloth.”

Unfortunately, this isn’t uncommon. For the SCOTUS has long been, it appears, buying cloth in bulk. Thus did Silberman not only complain that the ’64 opinion must be overturned as it’s “a threat to American Democracy,” but go further.

In fact, he “makes plain his disdain for Justice Kennedy’s contention that ‘criticism of the Court is tantamount to an attack on the Constitution,’” relates commentator Andrea Widburg. “Instead, ‘I readily admit that I have little regard for holdings of the Court that dress up policymaking in constitutional garb.’ It’s that kind of dissimulation that is ‘the real attack on the Constitution.’ Indeed, ‘[t]he notion that the Court should somehow act in a policy role as a Council of Revision is illegitimate.’”

Silberman is merely stating a simple fact: It isn’t the courts’ role to in essence “make law” by imposing their own extra- or un-constitutional biases from the bench. Yet generally ignored is that this problem of judicial adventurism cannot realistically be mitigated without first tackling judicial supremacy.

Judges’ “privilege of their corps,” which Jefferson warned about, was perfectly epitomized by Kennedy’s “criticism of the Court = an attack on the Constitution” line. We should just respond, “Nice try.”

It’s natural for individuals and institutions to want to place themselves beyond criticism, but this is worse than un-American (are the justices royalty?). It also smacks of self-deification. It has often been joked that the Supreme Court is not the Supreme Being, but only God is beyond criticism because only He is infallible in all facets. The rest of us require the iron that sharpens iron that is legitimate criticism.

https://thenewamerican.com/judicial-supremacy-to-judicial-lunacy-a-judge-challenges-the-supreme-courts-supreme-folly/

continued

>>72943

Kennedy’s self-deification is also a quite bold attempt at flipping the script. The SCOTUS has essentially been attacking the Constitution for at least a century via its unconstitutional opinions. Now, to avoid being called out on this, Kennedy claims that criticizing this abuse (or any other SCOTUS trespass) is an attack on the Constitution! Talk about projection.

But let’s talk about protection — of the courts and from them. It’s no surprise that many justices may want to be beyond criticism, for they’ve long been beyond accountability and beyond control. Judicial supremacy will have this effect.

Long our status quo, judicial supremacy is the standard whereby court decisions will constrain not just the parties in a given case or even just (regarding SCOTUS decisions) the whole judicial branch, but the legislative and executive branches as well.

To fully grasp the problem with this, consider a warning from James Madison, the “Father of the Constitution.” He said that having the judicial, legislative, and executive powers all vested in one entity is the very definition of tyranny. Well, now consider what former ambassador and government affairs expert Alan Keyes once explained:

The courts obviously have their judicial power. Yet if they can strike down a law in contravention of lawmakers’ will — essentially making themselves a super-legislature of last resort — then they’ve arrogated to themselves the legislative power as well. Moreover, if they can tell the executive branch that it must or may not execute a given action, regardless of that branch’s convictions about the action’s constitutionality, they’ve also then arrogated to themselves the executive power.

Ergo, all three powers are then vested in one body, the courts. Goodbye, checks and balances.

Worse still, this tyrannical power (using Madison’s description) is wielded by the one governmental branch that’s beyond the people’s reach. The legislators are elected as is the president (the executive branch), so the people can hold them accountable at the ballot box. But federal judges are appointed — for life — meaning, they’re effectively shielded from accountability.

I wrote “effectively” because the Constitution does give Congress the power to impeach judges, eliminate rogue lower federal courts, and limit the appellate jurisdiction of the SCOTUS. Yet this power isn’t exercised, and it won’t be for a simple reason:

Legislators like it when the courts “settle” hot-button, controversial issues so they don’t actually have to take a stand. In other words, lawmakers are outsourcing decisions they should make — and be held accountable for — to the branch of government that cannot be held accountable. Nice con, huh?

Having unaccountable people make our laws is obviously dangerous, and this is why Jefferson warned that the judicial-supremacy standard would make our Constitution a felo de se, an “act of suicide.” But what can we do?

First realize that judicial supremacy is not “the law of the land.” It’s not in the Constitution. Rather, the courts granted their absolute power to themselves, most notably in the Marbury v. Madison decision (1803). It’s reminiscent of how San Franciscan Joshua Abraham Norton, disgusted with our political and legal systems (I can sympathize), declared himself “Emperor of these United States” in 1859. Only, nobody took him seriously.

https://thenewamerican.com/judicial-supremacy-to-judicial-lunacy-a-judge-challenges-the-supreme-courts-supreme-folly/

continued

>>72944

So why do we take the judges who would be kings seriously? The Constitution does, of course, explicitly grant the SCOTUS (and lower courts created by Congress) the “judicial power.” But here’s the rub: It doesn’t specify precisely what this power is.

In fact, according to Alan Keyes, with whom I discussed this matter, the Founding Fathers didn’t elaborate on this anywhere. Thus does a simple conclusion suggest itself: They believed that what constituted the judicial power was self-explanatory. Yet it logically follows that if this is so, it’s only because that power already existed and was well understood.

What was the Founders’ understanding? They emerged from the British tradition, which had, of course, long included a legal system and judges. Here’s what it didn’t involve: ruling laws unconstitutional and then “striking them down.”

After all, Britain didn’t (and doesn’t) have a Constitution.

In other words, British judges could take issue with a law and free someone charged under it. But they could not eliminate the law itself. This was the default understanding of the judicial power.

Now, if the Founders meant to radically change this — if they’d intended to grant American judges the unprecedented power to strike down law — wouldn’t they have said so? Wouldn’t they have stated, “The courts have the ‘judicial power,’ and understand what this actually means now” and then elaborate? That they didn’t indicates that the “judicial power” was what it had always been.

That is, judges’ rulings constrain the plaintiff(s) and defendant(s) party to the case in question, but they constrain no one else and cannot alter law.

The bottom line is that judicial supremacy appears a fiction, an extra-constitutional power enjoyed by a governmental branch that has neither the police nor the military to enforce it — and at the pleasure of the other two branches.

Late Justice Antonin Scalia alluded to this reality when he warned his SCOTUS fellows in his Obergefell v. Hodges (2015) dissent, “With each decision of ours that takes from the People a question properly left to them — with each decision that is unabashedly based not on law, but on the ‘reasoned judgment’ of a bare majority of this Court — we move one step closer to being reminded of our impotence.”

It’s high time the Court was reminded of its impotence. If we’re unwilling to issue that reminder, then it signals that we suffer an impotence running far, far deeper than law.

https://thenewamerican.com/judicial-supremacy-to-judicial-lunacy-a-judge-challenges-the-supreme-courts-supreme-folly/

end

U.S. SEC begins rollout of law aimed at delisting Chinese firms

The U.S. securities regulator on Wednesday said it has adopted regulations, drawn up by Congress, that would kick foreign companies off American stock exchanges if they do not comply with U.S. auditing standards. The Holding Foreign Companies Accountable Act, signed into law by then-President Donald Trump in December, aims to remove Chinese companies from U.S. exchanges if they fail to comply with U.S. auditing standards for three years in a row.

While it applies to companies from any country, the legislation’s sponsors intended it to target Chinese companies listed in the United States, such as Alibaba, tech firm Pinduoduo Inc and oil giant PetroChina Co Ltd. The legislation aimed to address long-held concerns over the SEC’s inability to properly vet Chinese companies listed in the United States. That is because the Chinese government, citing national security concerns, is reluctant to let overseas regulators inspect local accounting firms which audit those Chinese companies. Lawmakers said they were worried U.S. investors were being put at risk by exposure to Chinese companies that are not held to the same standard as domestic companies. Some investment experts have also raised concerns that U.S. investors may effectively be funding instruments of the Chinese government, a U.S. adversary.

The SEC Wednesday amendments will require companies to prove to the regulator that they are not owned or controlled by an entity of a foreign government, and also require disclosures on audit arrangements and government influence, the SEC said. The agency fast-tracked the rule through “interim final amendments,” but is seeking public comments on a process for identifying foreign companies to which the legislation should apply. Determining which entities the measure should apply to may prove challenging, given many companies have complex structures with subsidiaries or shell units registered in other jurisdictions. The legislation required the SEC to issue rules around how companies should submit documentation within 90 days of enactment.

It is still “actively assessing” how to roll out the rest of the law’s requirements, including the identification process and trading prohibition requirements, the statement said.

https://www.reuters.com/article/usa-sec-foreigncompanies/update-2-u-s-sec-begins-rollout-of-law-aimed-at-delisting-chinese-firms-idUSL1N2LM1PI

>>72946

hey gb

I apologize for not askin ya to take notes, got a call during lunch, had to make calls and send emails, jumped on and saw wakes had scooted so I just jumped in, bake set now, finished calls (knock on wood) all done

you drop em whenever it warms up enough to take doggo out

tyvm muh fren

nest time I ast real nice like

kek

haz a qooqie yo

tyvm

Senator John Kennedy (R-LA) questioned the wisdom of a push by congressional Democrats to enact legislation in the immediate aftermath of a tragic shooting in Boulder, CO earlier this week.

Kennedy suggested Democrats were using this moment to enact gun control because he did not think they believed in the Second Amendment as interpreted by the federal government.

“Look, these killings were terrible,” he said. “They were horrible. I’m reminded though that, you know, America is a big country. We’re free, and one of the prices we pay for that freedom is that you’re always going to have some people who abuse it. Freedom is risk. But we have got to concentrate on is how to control that risk. You’re not going to stop the killings until you stop the killers. But you don’t stop drunk drivers by getting rid of all sober drivers, which is what many of my Democratic friends want to do with respect to the Second Amendment.”

“In my judgment, we do not need more gun control,” Kennedy continued. “We need more idiot control. How do we do that? We have already tried, the Republicans have. Senator Grassley, Senator Cruz had a bill to strengthen our national database. We regulate gun ownership in America. If you are convicted of certain crimes, if you have a tendency to violence, if you are mentally ill, and you want to buy a gun, your name has to run through a database. The problem is that the database has huge holes in it. And many federal agencies and state agencies are very cavalier about sending in the names. Grassley and Cruz’s bill, which I support, would have tightened up the database, and it would have cracked down on people who have guns who shouldn’t have guns.”

“Do you know why the bill didn’t pass?” he added. “Many of my Democratic colleagues filibustered it. Now, if you drill down far enough, what you’re going to find — I don’t want to paint with too broad a brush — but many, not all, many of my Democratic colleagues — they just don’t believe in the Second Amendment. They just don’t. I mean, we have heard it in terms of police officers. I mean, basically, the Democratic position is that if a bad guy shoots a cop, it’s the gun’s problem. If a cop shoots a bad guy, it’s the cop’s fault. You know, if it weren’t for double standards here, we wouldn’t have any standards at all.”

https://www.breitbart.com/clips/2021/03/23/gop-sen-kennedy-we-do-not-need-more-gun-control-we-need-more-idiot-control/

>>72937

ALONG23' USAF E-4B Nightwatch departed Dyess AFB ne after an overnight-inbound from Lincoln Muni. Airport yesterday

Sayin' A LONG PAIN…..mebby

>>72941

Yellen in sharp exchange with Republican senator over IMF plan to expand reserves

Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen had a sharp exchange Wednesday during a Senate hearing with Sen. John Kennedy, Republican of Louisiana, over a renewed plan by the International Monetary Fund to issue $650 billion in new reserves, known as Special Drawing Rights, to member states. IMF Managing Director Kristalina Georgieva on Tuesday said she would present the plan to the IMF's executive board in June. The IMF first floated the plan last year as a way to help countries pay for the costs of battling the coronavirus. But it was blocked by the Trump administration and then-Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin. Republicans in Congress are unhappy the IMF plan has been resuscitated. They note that China, Russia and Venezuela will benefit from the new reserve allocation. Kennedy said the Biden administration was making an end-run around Congress and alleged the IMF plan would cost American taxpayers "$180 billion." Yellen grew frustrated as the exchange went on. She said the U.S. would earn interest on its new SDRs so that the cost of the program would be a "wash." "I don't know where you got a number like that from." Yellen said.

https://www.marketwatch.com/story/yellen-in-sharp-exchange-with-republican-senator-over-imf-plan-to-expand-reserves-2021-03-24

>>72956

yep.

All designed to have them come back to the "experts" for definition.

He should have cited where it came from-may have but I'm not watching the vid

#326crowd bake

>>72786, >>72787, >>72792, >>72831, >>72810, >>72827, >>72913, >>72921, >>72924, >>72927, >>72954 PF Gold Stuffs

>>72955 Yellen in sharp exchange with Republican senator over IMF plan to expand reserves-marketwatch

>>72952 Myanmar coup latest: Suu Kyi's court hearing postponed to April 1-nikkei

>>72948 GOP Sen. Kennedy: ‘We Do Not Need More Gun Control — We Need More Idiot Control’ Mar 23 Breitbart-Troof!

>>72946 U.S. SEC begins rollout of law aimed at delisting Chinese firms

>>72943,>>72944, >>72945, >>72949 Op-Ed: Judicial Supremacy to Judicial Lunacy? A Judge Challenges the Supreme Court’s Supreme Folly-thenewamerican-plus additional info

>>72942 State Dept AC SAM061 on descent for Laredo, TX….sending in the clowns

>>72941 Yellen open to U.S. banks paying dividends, repurchasing stock

>>72936, >>72939 All 10 Boulder Colorado Victims Were White. It’s Time to End Anti-White Race Hate-Mar 23

>>72934, >>72938 Grant Agreement between Swissmedic and Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation-swissmedic.ch

>>72930 GameStop tumbles as Reddit darling considers share sale

>>72929 Boatfag-Suez Canal look

>>72928 Here We Go – FBI Knew Boulder, Colorado, Suspect Identity Prior to Shooting-cinservativetreehouse

>>72925 Suez Traffic To Resume As Blocking Ship Partially Moved-zh

>>72920 Turkey tells U.S. at NATO that Russian defense purchase is 'done deal'

>>72916 Location of Origin of COVID-19 Pandemic Identified – Between Two of China’s Biological Warfare Facilities in Wuhan

>>72790 WHO Insiders blow the whistle on BIll Gates' plan to take over WHO pandemic plan worldwide

>>72791 N. Korea fired two cruise missiles off west coast on Sunday: sources

>>72793 US, Japan and South Korea to discuss North Korea next week

>>72798, >>72804 Megaship Blocks All Traffic In Suez Canal After Running Aground In Bizarre Incident (EVER GIVEN)

>>72799, >>72802, >>72803, >>72837, >>72836, >>72831, >>72828, >>72826, >>72821, >>72820, >>72819, >>72808, >>72807 Colorado Shooter mini-bun

>>72809 BLM Mob Traps 100 Customers Inside Grocery Store: ‘We’re Shutting S*** Down!’ (VIDEO)

>>72812, >>72861, 72864 Amazing discussion of WHO insiders (tube Video, mp4)

>>72813 NEW: NJ gym owner Ian Smith announces that he is giving out free gym memberships to anyone who doesn't get the COVID-19 vaccine

>>72817 Mitch McConnell says if Democrats destroyed filibuster, "nuclear winter" would follow

>>72818 Cancel Culture Chick gets Canceled. (Twatter video)

>>72822 When hear "criminal justice reform," THIS is what it really means.

>>72823 CAUGHT ON VIDEO: FBI and DHS Attempt To Recruit Former Green Beret to Infiltrate and Spy on Oath Keepers, Proud Boys –But He Recorded The Conversation!

>>72825 Next weekend (April 3) will be final 4 (brackets/basketball)

>>72826 President Joe Biden is protected by AR-15s and similar firearms while pushing to prohibit law-abiding Americans from owning those same guns.

>>72828 Remind me but after Muslim radicals killed 3,000 Americans on 9/11 did anyone call for outlawing box cutters or airplanes? #GunControl

>>72829 Texas Lt. Gov: “We’re catching all the criminals but I worry about all the children; they’re going to be thrown in the SEX TRAFFICKING RINGS and this President and this Vice President do nothing about it…”

>>72830 Biden Spending Millions per Day to Halt Border Wall Construction

>>72834 Earth Weather News: CME hit tonight, and tomorrow night

>>72835 Crowdstrike Holdings sold by executives: $51.20m-Mar 19,22,23

>>72838 Mark Dice: Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey’s legacy is intertwined with child porn. (video, possibly satire)

>>72839 It will be decades before some cities come back from this. Philly doesn’t look too good.

>>72840 Jack Maxey (Rumble) BREAKING! FBI Withheld DAMNING EVIDENCE That Would Have Stopped President Trump's Impeachment!

>>72842 79yr old vet, shot by police after he went for gun and shot at them. Standoff, possible MK Ultra (delusional/thought being followed etc)

>>72845, >>72846 In Video, Trump Congratulates O’Keefe On ‘Big Win’ In Defamation Lawsuit Against New York Times: Asks Public For Legal Defense Fund Contributions

>>72849 Tanzania Flag of Tanzania Thousands line the streets to mourn the President Magufuli. Monster crowds, crying cheering on and paying tribute to someone who dared to question the narrative and paid for it with his life. Long Live Freedom Fisted hand

>>72850 Facebook Confirms It Deleted Account For Suspected Boulder Shooter Containing Posts About Islam, Trump

>>72854 ‘Nothing else explains it’: Norwegian scientists say AstraZeneca DID cause blood clots, as British & Dutch experts dismiss theory

>>72857 Military exercise in Middle East? Possibly connected to Evergreen blocking Suez?

>>72874, >>72875 Developers of Oxford-AstraZeneca Vaccine Tied to UK Eugenics Movement (12-26-2021)

#326

>>72956

here ya go

doggo gibing me the stank eye

>>72958

>>72962

enough stank eye yo

>>72963

https://twitter.com/DanScavino/status/1374723505128869889

https://twitter.com/mikepompeo/status/1374733604195041280

Pompeo beats Biden-Harris to the border

>>72927

RCH583T USAF C-17 Globemaster on ground at Buckley AFB Denver CO from Dover AFB

pf is blind right now

"server not found"

can someone confirm?

https://tar1090.adsbexchange.com/?icao=ae0940

>>72968

yvw

>>72967

RCH578T USAF C-17 Globemaster departed Buckley AFB after a ground stop west

>>72911

>>72910

see wat i mean?

yous guise gang up on me when ahm not here

jus' better watch out

or i'm gonna sic muh HEFFALUMPS & WOOZLES on ya.

>>72973

cakes made me do it.

>>72973

thunk'

>>72974

>>72974

boy, dat was quik

>>72975

dat better be aimed at yer wakey bakey pal, not da graveyard

we know how to deal with flaker bakers.

>>72980

between meetings. yer timing is exquisite.