/k/ - Weapons

>>680213

>Are people just that stupid?

They are educated stupid.

Wish I had the screencap about the subconscious mind of higher animals not being capable of distinguishing video footage from reality thus making for an excellent tool in behavioural modification.

>CIAniggers gave dune coons some weapons, a bit of funding, and pointed them in the right direction

<OMG CONTROLLED DEMOLITION HOLOGRAPHIC REMOTE-CONTROLLED PLANES YOU GUIZ1!1!!

Stupidity is when you think the second option is more plausible than the first.

>>680225

People still fall for the second one or the whole government used pre-set explosives meme?

>>680229

>pre-set explosives

>imblying they didn't had crisis actors manually activate the thermite charges on site

>>680232

>implying New York isn't a giant hologram

>>680225

>fedposting

>inb4 steel doesn't have to melt

You're right

But the steel melted

See vid related, video evidence of molten steel and firefighters seeing that exact thing.

Also, the uniform downward motion. There was no slowdown in the motion downward, because there was no resistance, as the supports had already been blown.

9/11 was a controlled demolition

>>680235

Falling objects don't slow down, retard, they accelerate, especially as the mass of the falling object INCREASES with every additional floor that collapses. Do you know nothing about physics?

>>680233

>implying all the planes involved didn't launch from Bielefeld, explaining the lack of evidence following their crashes as they never existed in the first place

>>680236

>mass of the falling object INCREASES with every additional floor that collapses.

But I thought the molten steel trickled downwards and set the offices on fire which triggered a chain reaction that crashed the building from the inside, allowing the rigid upper sections of the WTC to tear through the softened lower parts despite their disparate masses????

>>680238

>strawman

Do you really believe that it's impossible that a building can fall down and be on fire at the same time? What the fuck is your point supposed to be? What are you attempting to imply?

>>680236

An unironic fed.

Even lying about basic truths.

No, if the building collapsed it would slow down when falling on the rest of the RIGID structure.

As demonstrated by vid related.

>>680239

>implying the universe isn't made up of 6 gorillion one dimensional simultaneous states crossing into each other at superlaminate speeds

>>680241

>gravity causes things to start at an arbitrary velocity and then lose velocity as they fall, ignoring conservation of momentum

>paper is the same thing as concrete and steel

>things that have almost no weight, retain their shape, and are a foot from the ground are the same as a gigantic skyscraper collapsing

>>680241

Don't bother, Strelok. He's too retarded to understand that he's wrong.

All this arguing is pointless, though: Whether it was a controlled demolition or a CIA-sponsored genuine attack, we all agree that the government did it. Like, why do we care how? The point is that they faked yet another terrorist attack to justify a war, killing about 3000 Americans in the process, and nobody's doing a goddamn thing about it.

Boycott your government.

>>680225

>holographic planes

The so called "truthers" were always such a joke. They came up with the idea it was a controlled demolition first, then used pathological thinking and reasoning to say everything is "proof" it was an inside job. No amount of evidence provided on why they are wrong will ever change their minds, and threads like this are purposely, or ironically, troll threads of no value.

Kids, right now with the tensions with the Persians, we should expect a few things. People in Iran are probably being bombarded with propaganda from the west, and western internet viewers will be seeing more shit like this. Be prepared for more "everything in this world is an inside job", the use of the term "false flag" applied to everything from Sandy Hook to people stubbing their toes, and endless nonsense about how everything is a conspiracy.

>implying anything is real

>implying we don't live inside the body of a superior being

>>680248

I would agree, arguing with feds is pointless.

Pointing out the truth is not

Claiming that the collapsing building would not slow down on the '''entire cold, structurally sound base," is an outright lie.

Building 7, clear controlled demolition

Jet fuel cannot melt steel beams, yet there was molten steel, as thermite was used

9/11 was a controlled demolition.

>>680225

Act of deception and disinformation. Tie truth (alphabet agencies organized acts) with idiotic lie (controlled demolition) to smear the truth to show everyone who don't believe official version as idiots.

>>680289

how do you even collapse 3 buildings with 2 planes?

>>680326

>controlled demolition

I guess that's why a material engineer who worked in demolitions and called building 7 collapse a clear-cut controlled demolition got into a fatal car accident immediately after the interview.

>>680225

So where did the molten metal come from?

>>680345

>>680345

>censoring yourself from saying muttslime

wew

Because none of the truthers admit that muslims were involved, some retards even deny that airplanes crashed into the tower.

It was clearly a three part operation.

CIA controlled terrorists were trained to crash into the buildings. They were trained professionaly in Bosnia and provided with Bosnian passports so they could sneak through security. They actually crashed the planes into the towers! That part is 100% real, it HAS to be real and highly visible for the false flag to work!

On the other side agents working domestically snuck into the building almost two years previous to plant the thermite charges with the temperature wicks. Another reason why airplanes had to crash into it is because the kerosene lit the fucking thermite fuses.

The third part of the operation is the media coverage and the orchestrated response, especially in congress, which permitted the agency unlimited funds for twenty fucking years.

Thats why Osama was so "hard to find", he had dirt on the operation (or CIA was afraid he did) so the agency protected him… until access to his PC in Pakistan by an asset proved all he had on there was some incest porn. And the seals were sent in.

>>680368

Pretty much this, although there's no reason they couldn't have remotely detonated the thermite.

>>680333

>>680368

>>680371

>plausible deniability

>google it

Installing hundreds of charges in the specific places of buildings is too easy to fail and been caught red handed. Airplanes? Easy peasy. Never been done before no one accounts such risks, airliners were soft target for both real terrorists and glow niggers.

>>680377

>Installing hundreds of charges in the specific places of buildings is too easy to fail

<implying you couldn't send in some of your glownig engineers disguised as employees of some construction firm performing "maintenance" a few days/weeks prior

<implying there wasn't a giant clusterfuck regarding the twin towers' asbestos removal operations for years up until 9/11

>>680377

>conspiracies are impossible because people would have noticed

We wouldn't be having this discussion if people hadn't noticed.

>>680368

>cia going full retard

The planes were remote-controlled. And the arabs were just useful idiots in the jewish plot.

>>680377

>Installing hundreds of charges in the specific places of buildings is too easy to fail and been caught red handed.

That's wrong though. How many normal office workers have access to the maintenance areas of the buildings? How would they even see what's going on there?

Plus the airplanes alone couldn't have made the 3 buildings collapse.

>>680244

>gravity causes things to start at an arbitrary velocity and then lose velocity as they fall, ignoring conservation of momentum

It seems you don’t even know what conservation of momentum is, Mr. Glow-in-the-dark. If you have the top 1 floor of a 20 story building fall then your momentum is the force of gravity times the mass of that floor. Every single other floor is at rest and structurally stable, so the first floor must have the kinetic energy to collide with every other floor before it impacts the next floor below it. The momentum of the motionless floors is also conserved which should slow the falling floor down (or expel fragment net upwards to conserve the momentum of the motionless floors). Because each floor is stable except the one that fell each floor the top one hits applies the same force onto the falling mass as is applied onto it. So unless the mass of the top floor is significantly more or the distance between the top and second upmost floor is significant more than the distance between every other floor. Yes the mass increases but the mass is the least at the first impact. Which means each additional collapsed floor will have a greater chance to collapse the next one below it, which means the very first impact of the top floor to the lower one is the least likely and requires the most energy.

>>680368

>which permitted the agency unlimited funds for twenty fucking years.

So 9/11 2 electric boogaloo in two years?

>>680371

Too many chances of it going off ahead of time, even with the best remote detonators. Or worse, denotators failing to fire and getting their circuitry found in the rubble.

It had to be chemical not electrical, it had to be100% foolproof with every explosive going off, and the only way to do that is to make them temperature sensitive and then douse them in burning kerosene.

>>680377

The problem is that an airplane on its own wouldn't be able to do it.

This post answers OP's question >>680392

>>680386

These buildings have security and you trying to use common attack vector every security in this building expects (explosives). You you going to be caught redhanded ot you need to flash your glownigger IDs to send security away. These leaves traces and after you leave security would come back anyway snooping places you visited (invasion into home turf issues.). It may work if you contraband single bomb and detonate it immediately before security can react. Butr placing hundred charges is too much points of failure.

Remember it actually happened. Glow niggers WERE CUGHT red-handed with arab pilots training but such activity had plausible dependability and reports were dismissed by higher command. Packs of explosives have no plausible deniability.

>>680414

>>680419

>George W. Bush's brother was on the board of directors of a company providing electronic security for the World Trade Center, Dulles International Airport and United Airlines, according to public records. The company was backed by an investment firm, the Kuwait-American Corp., also linked for years to the Bush family.

The planes didn't even need to be remote-controlled - there could have been a computer on board that automatically took over the plane after it was in the air for some time, then executed the pre-programmed flight pattern into the wtc. Such a system may need a few key instructions when to switch on, but no uninterrupted radio contact. It would then switch off all communication systems and pilot controls in the air and execute it's pre-programmed course into the target.

One of those systems failed, hence why wtc 7 was detonated without any plane hitting the building - it was too dangerous to let the thermite-packed building stand, the explosives could have been found.

>>680414

So you're ignoring the evidence that thermite was used, on the basis that they wouldn't have used thermite because it would have left evidence?

>>680422

So Jeb was in on it? Why didn’t we listen to him, what will he do next in revenge?

>>680438

I think it was Marvin.

>>680468

>implying Jeb isn’t the mastermind behind the entire Bush family

BIDF please leave.

>>680474

L-look, Jeb isn't anyone important, you can forget about him, okay?

>>680476

We all know he’ll win the next next election as an Independent and establish the first Empire of America. Slow and steady like a turtle.

>>680513

BTW 911 in the matter is mirror of Pearl Harbor. Deep state just needed to sit on their asses and let things happen. Perfect crime.

>>680513

If you were on trial and they found your fingerprints all over the crime scene, do you think you could convince the jury that it couldn't have been you because you wouldn't be careless enough to leave your fingerprints all over the crime scene?

>>680225

Get dabbed on boomer.

>>680523

With a lawyer jewish enough it's possible, in the same way they argued that intra-state commerce is also interstate commerce.

>found not guilty becuase you're too professional

>they use you instead to pin you for 30 different unsolved murderers instead.

Why is it so hard to believe that sunni muslims in Saudi Arabian could fly the planes and crash into the towers?

Is the narrative now that muslims are ultimately innocent and it's always the jews?

>>680572

Saudis can barely fly planes as is, muslims are just proxy warriors doing the kike's bidding.

The entire war on terror thing was just to antagonize non-proxy moslems sufficiently against wh*te christians that they'd more easily join ISIS and other golem orgs to destroy the wh*te race and their own history and people in the process.

>>680572

Because the Saudi's are western "allies" to the extent we have important deals with them, to protect them in exchange for oil and petrodollar shit. They are abusive, horrible people, and backstab and undermine the west at every single opportunity, because they are our enemies at the same time as they are "allies" with us. Important 'allies", to boot. They are also at war with a lot of other races and other groups of muslims, and we get pulled into their wars because of these deals.

So, the Saudi's support a terrorist attack to smash planes into the twin towers. When they are going to be blamed, the higher ups say "we can't do that son, we have to let the Saudi's be blameless, because they are important allies in geopolitical sense as well as oil considerations, these were lone wolf terrorists, son". Saudis' use their immunity and paid shills to blame everyone on God's green earth to take the blame off themselves, love to blame Israel for everything, so why not blame Israel again? That's what they love to do, murder innocent people then blame their enemies. One day the Saudi's are innocent of everything, everyone else is guilty in this world. They knock down two towers, kill 3000 people, and instead of being punished they are rewarded with propaganda against the west and Israel.

Be careful of many so called 'white nationalists" who seem to care more about Palestine and are always sneaking in "isn't Islam great for Europe, won't Islam save the west from degeneracy" and always push pro muslim stuff EVEN WHILE THE WEST IS BEING OVERRUN AND DESTROYED BY THEIR INVASION?

Paid shills work the internet constantly, these people use their oil money for war. War to kill Assyrians, war to fight over Afghanistan, invasion of the west, terrorism, and to pay people to constantly bombard you with pro musilm, everything else is bad nonsense. So, yes, Vietnamstrelok, you are onto the truth to why these posts are always "muslims are always innocent and jews are always guilty", and the strange fact so many so called European Nationalists care more about Muslim causes then their own genocide.

So how did they trick 300 million people into believing this huge lie?

I was in Silicon Valley on 9/11. That evening, and for weeks after, in the bar&grills, you could feel the positive energy. The MIC had been getting down-sized all during Clinton, which meant countless legions of Defense workers (who weren't any good for any real tech jobs where their Security Clearance didn't matter) had been losing homes, taking kids out of college, and generally eating shit for a decade, with no hope in sight. Suddenly, all that changed everyone's "Ship had come in".

Plus, no one gave a rat's ass about NYC especially all the high class restaurants near Ground Zero that were suddenly out of biz.

If the Jews hit a NASCAR race on 9/11 Israel wouldn't exist today, but they hit NYC which hasn't had any real Americans since "All In The Family" was on TV in the 1970s.

Jews were allowing Americans to openly hate any non-Whites, so there was a lot of pent up anger to be tapped.

>>680408

What do you think the Trump dossier is about? Its not 3000 dead civilians, but it turned 100% of the democrat party against Russia. And the republican party was already 80% anti Russian and 20% barely cognizant of the place.

The anti propaganda laws that protected americans from their own government are gone, the government can actually secretly own news and media outlets now. Given how many failing ones like washington post are being bailed out with mystery investors, I would bet on that already being the case. Online an entire generation is being bred to hate who the government tells them to hate.

America has cancelled almost ALL nuclear and espionage treaties, US is giving sarin to fucking terrorists and testing hemmhoragic fever in job lots because these weapons are old and obsolete compared to what is in service now. The other side is building fucking nuclear powered missiles that can stay airborne for weeks, torpedoes that create radioactive tsunamis, genetically engineering people and mass brainwashing whole civilizations. Doomsday weapons. Lets not forget West Point is churning out officers who think a nuclear war against DOOMSDAY FUCKING WEAPONS is winnable, and if you think the other great powers are more rational you are going to be briefly disappointed.

They dont need another 911.

Pretty soon a new cold war will start and CIA will have all the funding it wants until the moment this war turns hot. After that I doubt there will be anyone left to give a damn.

>>680579

>Be careful of many so called 'white nationalists" who seem to care more about Palestine and are always sneaking in "isn't Islam great for Europe, won't Islam save the west from degeneracy" and always push pro muslim stuff EVEN WHILE THE WEST IS BEING OVERRUN AND DESTROYED BY THEIR INVASION?

Except those "white nationalists" who support islamification of the west don't exist.

Plenty of "alt-right leaders" support Israel though. Mostly because they are either jews or married to jews themselves and serve as their shills.

Also, nice try at blaming the saudis for 911 and not the jew-controlled mossad/cia who actually did it with american-jewish help.

>>680648

>So how did they trick 300 million people into believing this huge lie?

Complete Jewish media control.

>>680653

The cold war actually never stopped.

>>680575

>Saudis can barely fly planes as is, muslims are just proxy warriors doing the kike's bidding.

They certainly can though. I've seen arab pilots.

The point is I don't see you hafta attack Iraq or Iran if it's the saudi muslims who are attacking you.

>>680658

>Except those "white nationalists" who support islamification of the west don't exist.

They do, there's the White Sharia meme which is top cringe.

>Also, nice try at blaming the saudis for 911 and not the jew-controlled mossad/cia who actually did it with american-jewish help.

The saudi are literally allies with Israel.

Why can't you blame the Saudis or any muslims at all?

>>680667

Why would you blame muslims for what jews did? It's not like sandniggers have the brains to pull 911 off, but they'd probably still help mossad/cia with everything they want, since saudi arabia only exists as long as the usa tolerate it.

>>680666

>They certainly can though. I've seen arab pilots.

but the allegeded 911 hijackers had only a few training simulator hours tops and could barely fly a tiny cessna. there's no proof they could in any way or shape fly the planes like they were flown.

>>680673

>Why would you blame muslims for what jews did? It's not like sandniggers have the brains to pull 911 off, but they'd probably still help mossad/cia with everything they want, since saudi arabia only exists as long as the usa tolerate it.

If they are accomplice, I don't see why they can't blame them. They are one and the see.

And you are not blaming anyone but the specific muslims in ISIS/Saudi Arabia who are hugely supportive of Israel.

>

but the allegeded 911 hijackers had only a few training simulator hours tops and could barely fly a tiny cessna. there's no proof they could in any way or shape fly the planes like they were flown.

It's not like they have to take off or land.

What they did is taking over the plane and crash straight into the towers.

That's what they can realistically learn in such a short time.

>>680675

God, this post was a mess.

>If they are accomplice, I don't see why they can't blame them. Especially in the case where sunni muslims and jews are one and the same.

>And you are not blaming anyone but the specific muslims in ISIS/Saudi Arabia who are hugely supportive of Israel.

>It's not like they have to take off or land. What they did is taking over the plane and crash straight into the towers.

>That's what they can realistically learn in such a short time.

>>680674

Actually flying a plane isn't that difficult if you don't have to take off or land.

>>680706

Flying a commercial airliner - even keep it steady - is massively harder than flying a tiny prop plane. And to fly it with pinpoint precision into a skyscraper is infinetly harder. Yet a bunch of arabs who didn't have the skill to do it easily managed that. Not to mention the artistic flying into the pentagon.

>>680675

>What they did is taking over the plane and crash straight into the towers.

Which didn't happen. The planes were computer/remote controlled.

>That's what they can realistically learn in such a short time.

See above.

>>680741

>the artistic flying into the pentagon.

and building 7.

>>680742

>implying WTC 7 wasn't destroyed in a controlled demolition using invisible plane holograms

>>680741

Well, what's harder, a bunch of arabs flying and crashing a plane into big targets like the two towers or the pentagon.

OR

A remote control system with pinpoint accuracy does that, from possibly kilometers away?

My problem is that your version of events make it more complicated just to NOT push the blame into muslims.

And even if the remote control theory is correct, the muslims still remain accomplices for hijacking the planes in the first place. Unless you believe the planes were not hijacked at all, or they are holograms.

>>680822

They were flying around for hours, it’s not like the planes were 1 km away from the towers when the shitskins hoped into the cockpits and turned it 10° towards the towers. Banking and turning a Cessna isn’t even comparable to flying a jetliner. Let alone the manoeuvre into the pentagon was nearly physically impossible for a plane of that size at the reported speed to do, but then the reports of a middle hitting the pentagon were just a mistake after they found all the remains of the plane. Oh…

>>680855

You completely danced around the gook's point. What is more difficult, teaching an Arab the most rudiments of flight or building a flying robot? Occam's razor tears all this nonsense to ribbons.

>>680861

>What is more difficult, teaching an Arab the most rudiments of flight or building a flying robot?

Are you implying Lockheeb wouldn't want to participate in a sekrit taxpayer funded false flag drone project meant to create more wars $$$ in the middle east?

>>680822

Whats harder, people flying in metal tubes…

OR!

People riding in steam powered trains.

Checkmate airplanes dont exist.

Ockhams razor is meant for when you have ZERO other evidence, not because its true 100% of the time, but because its a safer assumption to make. This isnt a case for the razor. We have other evidence. OPs entire fucking video is about it, I suggest you watch it BEFORE commenting.

And this entire thread answers op question

>So how did they trick 300 million people into believing this huge lie?

Because the government put a plausible explanation in front of a bunch of hologram, drone, cruise missile nonsense. And the plausible explanation won. The conspiracytards help the conspiracy 9 times in 10, I wouldnt be surprised if at least some of the garbage in this thread was government funded.

>>680658

>>>680648 (You)

>

>>So how did they trick 300 million people into believing this huge lie?

>

Its not that so many Americans in establishment believed anything. The just knew it was very much in their own personal interest to say they believed and help push the official story.

Why do so many Americans push the Holohoax Story onto other Americans given 1/2 a chance? Exact same reason they will push religion. They are way too stupid to push math, and they know pushing an establishment story gives them a sort of authority they are otherwise denied due to their natural limitations.

>Complete Jewish media control.

>>680861

>What is more difficult, teaching an Arab the most rudiments of flight or building a flying robot?

We have been remote controlling airplanes since World War II. Modern jetliners are heavily computerized. They didn't build custom "flying robots", they already have all the equipment to fly remotely.

Instead of proving how the towers fell perhaps a more pertinent question would be (((who))) benefited from the towers falling?

Be careful not to overactivate your almond.

>>680571

>your fingerprints are all over the crime scene CIA it was obviously you!

Then they either commit suicide with 7 gunshot wounds to the brain and heart or if the cia can't kill them they slowly feed them drugs until their mind breaks down enough to where they can send them to an insane asylum to peacefully live out the rest of their life in a padded room.

>>680877

>wtc7

Checking these.

>>680707

(((Weird))) how nobody made an effort to have a registry of all the names of "holocaust victims"

>>681306

>>681306

>There would be tons of people on the ground witness to a cockpit overhaul

Because it couldn't be hidden as a "routine maintenance", right?

>the company themselves would have to be involved,

Because there's no way jewish companies or jewish high-ranking corporates would ever work together, right?

>nd all of the planes used in 9/11 had a history and service record.

which is impossible to fake, right?

>You can't just magically turn a large commercial aircraft into a drone.

Remote-controlled planes were already created by the cia in the 60s or 70s.

>Similarly you can't just fucking 'put a program' into one that cuts all method of communication

Actually you can, just because you think it's impossible because you're ignorant doesn't mean no such technology exists. You are arguing it's impossible to manipulate an airplane's electronics when you got full access to it, which makes you look like an idiotic kike.

>>683326

And that would still be more complicated than the saudi terrorists being able to pilot plane.

Why do the jews risk this all this complicated machinery shit when they can just hire a bunch of muslims?

It seems you are just doing this to wash the hands of muslims from the entire thing (and yeah, these muslims are saudi hired thugs, they aren't innocent regardless).

>>683334

Yeah, it's the point.

The saudi flying the planes into the tower is a simple plan than installing a drone control system on the plane, control it from kilometers away WHILE still sending in the muslims in anyway.

The only boon to the second hypothesis is trying to prove the muslims were somehow innocent for not piloting the planes, well, what for? Why are you defending muslims? Especially saudi muslims?

>>681306

>You can't just magically turn a large commercial aircraft into a drone.

You won't believe that boeing's planes couldn't be remote controlled, but you'd believe that 19 arabs with box cutters(the pilots flunked flight school) hijacked 3 planes and hit 3 buildings destroying a building completely, the only one not to get hit.

Did american airlines not have flight sheriffs in 2001?

>>683339

1. Muslims can hijack planes.

2. Muslim can pilot planes mid-flight.

3. WTC7 is being remoted controlled demolition, regardless of how the plane is controlled.

The fact the muslims pilot the planes do not somehow make WTC7 not being a controlled demolition.

>Did american airlines not have flight sheriffs in 2001?

Now, you are onto something there.

>>680213

The average person genuinely doesn't care.

>>683282

>Autopilot is the same as hacking an aircraft to turn into a drone and cutting off all forms of communication or manual control

>>683326

> it couldn't be hidden as a "routine maintenance

No not really, seeing as how large commercial aircraft don't fucking get cockpit rehauls everyday

> no way jewish companies or jewish high-ranking corporates would ever work together,

So now we're implicating not one but two airliner corps in being cooperative with the US government taking 3 of their planes and turning them into drones, which of course involves another who knows how many thousands of workplace employees. Sure

> is impossible to fake

Well then I suppose now we're including every civilian maintenance mechanic, every cleaner crew worker, every hanger worker, etc at every airport that worked on or near the thing, plus now the FAA is in this plot as well.

>Remote-controlled planes were already created by the cia in the 60s or 70s.

UAVs existing has no relevance to this you fucking absolute tard. They exist but so do UAV quadcopters, that doesn't make it feasible for a fully-laden Chinook to magically become a fucking drone.

Regardless to any of this, say they did somehow magically turn it into a drone; it then involves 25 or so people calling their family members, lying that the plane had been hijacked and then killing themselves, because there were calls from passengers too.

>>683333

>And that would still be more complicated than the saudi terrorists being able to pilot plane.

But a lot more reliable.

>Why do the jews risk this all this complicated machinery shit when they can just hire a bunch of muslims?

Because mudslimes are too stupid and incompetent to pull it off?

>It seems you are just doing this to wash the hands of muslims from the entire thing

Nope, just pointing out who benefited most from 911. Jews in the usa and israel.

>>683336

>The saudi flying the planes into the tower is a simple plan

Which they couldn't pull off because they didn't have the skills for that? And especially the flight course to the pentagon was extremely unlikely to have been pulled off.

>>683389

>No not really, seeing as how large commercial aircraft don't fucking get cockpit rehauls everyday

Which means nobody can ever access the planes to manipulate them, hm?

>So now we're implicating not one but two airliner corps in being cooperative with the US government taking 3 of their planes and turning them into drones, which of course involves another who knows how many thousands of workplace employees. Sure

Except you only need a handful of (((tribesmen))) to pull it off? All the technical stuff could have been done by israeli mossad employees. It's not like you need to tell all janitors of a company of your plan to manipulate a plane's electronics.

>UAVs existing has no relevance to this you fucking absolute tard.

Remote-controlled planes have been a thing since the 60s or 70s, idiot. Here's a video with a remote-controlled boeing from the 80s:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AWuvGoKdWFM

>>683434

>you cant stab with a cutter.

<he doesn't know how to lock a box cutter

>Be honest, look at the pictures of the hijackers, you think some boomer-american couldn't overpower any one of these limp wristed faggots with the force of their girth alone??

The passengers thought it was a ransom hijacking until the last minute, and the flight was full of jew york liberals anyway so most of them probably didn't even consider fighting back.

>My point is that they have a track record of being absolute shit pilots and their flight school records prove this, these guys where 80 IQ at best. The planes could have very easily been remote controlled, the planes flew over new york in circles for hours.

have you ever actually seen the courses any of these planes took? None of them were able to keep their plane flying straight and both of the WTC attackers had trouble finding New York. If the CIAnigger remote theory is true, then one would expect both planes to fly in at least the general direction of their target.

>>683389

>>683439

Depending on your exact definition of "drone", they've been a thing from 1915 (Siemens torpedo glider). Of course, that was wire guided, but the US fielded the TDR, which was a TV-guided "suicide" drone in 1944. None of this is support for the "remote control plane" theory

>>683434

>ok, here's the thing. 19 hijackers, divided by 4 means there there 5 box cutters in each plane.

Didn't they say they had bombs on the planes? Remember that up until that attack every previous plane hijacking ended in a ransom of the plane and passengers. It's why authorities didn't order any intercept until after the first collisions. They didn't want to risk the lives of the passengers by escalating the situation. When they figured out what the real objective was they scrambled everything they had and told pilots who didn't have weapons to ram the hijacked planes. 2 hit the towers in NY, 1 got to the Pentagon before it was intercepted because DC airspace was actually quite soft at that time, and 1 went down in a field when the passengers found out what happened with the other 3 planes.

>My point is that they have a track record of being absolute shit pilots and their flight school records prove this, these guys where 80 IQ at best. The planes could have very easily been remote controlled, the planes flew over new york in circles for hours.

They didn't need to land the planes, just keep them pointed in a general direction, then guide them into a large stationary target. That's not that difficult.

>And a plane never hit the building

But falling debris did. While Building 7 looked intact from a particular angle, rubble and burning material had crashed through the roof and started fires inside that gutted the interior. By the time it collapsed only the outer shell remained intact.

There was a conspiracy at work on that day. Muslim terrorists conspired to hijack commercial airliners and turn them into suicide bombs while using the passengers as human shields so they could get to their targets unimpeded by any air intercept. And it worked almost perfectly. There's no need to invoke secret government plots, remote controls, holographic technology that didn't exist at that time, controlled demolition, or any other nonsense. Fanatic Muslims wanted to strike a mortal blow at a hated enemy for what they viewed as foreign occupation on holy land, or support for Israel, or to scare people into converting, or whatever else they might have hoped would happen. The guys in that spread of portraits were the ISIS of their day, merciless murderers who believed what they were doing was justified by their faith and sanctioned by their god.

>>683439

>>683434

The only point of contention here is that mudslimes are shit and cannot fly planes, which is obviously false since I have seen arab pilots.

And again, it's not like they are taking off or landing here, they are hijacking the planes and fucking crash it into big targets.

>Nope, just pointing out who benefited most from 911. Jews in the usa and israel.

Yeah, but it doesn't wash the hands of the muslims if the saudi did do it.

>Be honest, look at the pictures of the hijackers, you think some boomer-american couldn't overpower any one of these limp wristed faggots with the force of their girth alone??

Honestly, no, american boomers are some of the most braindead and cattle-like persons to exist.

>>683473

WTC7 is definitely remot control demo'd.

Possibly the other two too, in conjunction with the planes.

>>683477

What makes you say that? Seems to me that this was a case of collateral damage leading to a collapse. Architects try to design their buildings to handle a certain amount of extra load but I think we can all agree that it would be unreasonable to expect every commercial building to be designed to withstand either a collision with a plane or another building or building's worth of material falling on it.

If you disagree with the experts - the engineers and architects - I'd like to know why. What evidence do you have to support the conjecture that WTC7 was brought down by explosive demolition? Some quotes taken out of context? a video showing part of the collapse which is also consistent with the fire-induced collapse theory? Is there video of the inside of WTC7 either as it's collapsing or just before that shows the interior of the building is pristine? How do you explain the video of the fire in building 7 at the 1:00 mark in the attached video, was it not relevant?

And if the attached video and the evidence it presents can't be trusted because it comes from the government, what sources would you would accept?

>>683480

The way it crumbles PERFECTLY on itself is a direct proof of remote control demo.

>>683480

But it's wasn't perfect. It only looked that way from the one angle and only before it got obstructed by the building in the foreground. When viewed from other angles the collapse was far messier and less symmetric, and the damage was more apparent even before the collapse.

And what about the fires that were clearly visible from the outside? The photographs? The eye witnesses? If all of that has to be dismissed as disinformation from glow-in-the-dark spooks, what evidence would you accept?

>>683486

2 Points:

- Is this caption accurate? By that I mean is this really a photo of the inside one of the towers and are these Israelis? Am I just supposed to take your word for it?

-How do you know that those cardboard boxes contain fuses for demolition charges? The code on that box could refer to anything.

>>683439

>Which means nobody can ever access the planes to manipulate them

What sort of truism are you trying to get me to agree to you babbling moron? Yes, people can access the plane, that doesn't change anything about cockpits rehauls on modern commercial aircraft being unheard of, and ground crews being privy to such an obvious and non concealable thing. Unless you're trying to the say that along with the company's complicity, the US government sent in a team to rehaul the cockpit overnight. At which point I think you've solidified your stupidity and ought to stop posting

>Except you only need a handful of (((tribesmen))) to pull it off? All the technical stuff could have been done by israeli mossad employees

No, unless these jews happen to be 300 IQ shapeshifters capable of mimicking their entire logistics and engineering departments. And I'm not entirely sure if you know this because you seem to be a bit left on the bellcurve, but neither company is made up of "israeli mossad" employees.

>Remote-controlled planes have been a thing since the 60s or 70s

UAVs existing has no relevance to this you fucking absolute tard. They exist but so do UAV quadcopters, that doesn't make it feasible for a fully-laden Chinook to magically become a fucking drone.

> remote-controlled boeing from the 80s

And they built it from the ground up, exactly because you can't turn a commercial aircraft into a drone with just a flick of a switch.

>>680523

>>680571

Jeffrey Epstein is pleading not guilty while claiming that he's willing to hand out names of other pedo Jews.

I don't know if it will pan out in his favor, but it shows that with the right attitude, anyone can try their best to weasel out of a court case.

>>683480

Looking at the video, it looks like the center of the building is collapsing, only for the outside frame to randomly start dropping.

It was clearly demolition.

>>683538

It's actually the whole other side of the building that's going down, you just can't see it from that angle. The collapse was not symmetric or contained.

Also, even if the collapse was center out, that would still be consistent with falling debris hitting the roof and starting fires in the center. Explosives leave chemical evidence in the form of both bits that don't ignite and unique combustion products, neither of which were found in the rubble. All available evidence suggests that it was a structural failure due to impact damage and fire, I have not seen a single piece of evidence put forward of a controlled demolition conspiracy. Where are the participants and witnesses? Are you going to tell me almost 20 years have gone by and not one wistleblower has come forward? How long did the government keep the Watergate break in a secret with far fewer people involved? The more people you include, the harder it is to keep a secret.

This is so fucking tedious.

9/11 was committed by members of Saudi intelligence (extremely close to the current reigning prince), with multiple allied agency with advance knowledge of at least some of the plotting (including but not limited to Israel and France that both c/c the fucking FBI) and supervised by CIA assets in Pakistan.

The weirdness that followed was the shoot down of UAF 93 (which Dick Cheney never hid he gave the order of shooting it down) of the State sanctioned insurance scam.

Every fucking else is a counter-fire.

Including and not limited to:

Jews did 9/11.

Jet fuel can't melt steel beams.

WTC-7.

Pentagon cruise missile.

Pentagon audit.

Except instead of disbanding the CIA and the FBI for their COLOSSAL INCOMPETENCE the neocons spinned it to give them more power than ever.

That's the real 9/11 conspiracy.

>>683558

>incompetence

Nah, the glowniggers knew what they were doing.

Pointing some people the right way and letting it happen allows for an indefinite "war against terror" which is a military contractor's and government's wet dream.

>>683552

Can you have provide the evidences of debris falling on it or any other angle?

Because your video is clear controlled demolition.

>>680525

>no mention of the mossad or the agenda for greater israel

based anonymous strikes again

>>683589

This tbh

9/11 was a controlled demolition

Building 7 was a controlled demolition

Jet fuel and office fires CANNOT melt steel beams

The molten steel and explosions started AFTER the fire started cooling down

The one who benefits from this?

You know who.

You can see them in here trying to sow the seeds of uncertainty and confusion by nitpicking. To obviously get the individual to feel uncertain about the entire story and neutralize their efforts through that.

I wanted to post that screencap of the canuck talking about critical theory, but I lost it

>>683589

>Guy points out that the captions on the picture aren't reliable or provable and taking it at face value is retarded

<Uhhhhhhhhhhh goat herders with satellite phones

What a great counter-argument

Regardless: Yes, I would say a group of goat herders with low tech hijacking a few aircraft and then crashing them into buildings is much, much more plausible than sneaky CIA nigger ninjas planting charges underneath everyone's noses

>So how did they trick 300 million people into believing this huge lie? Just by being the auhority?

Pretty much, if you are told by all the influencers, politicians, media,etc and you dont know much about anything, you will believe it. that and the overt "patriotism" americans have for sucking off their goverment who can do no wrong. They did plan to bomb american cities and blame it on cuba to start a war with operation northwoods and MKULTRA their citizens, but flying two planes into iconic landmarks is just crazytalk.

Dont forget the israeli students with detonators checking out each floor

>>683465

>he doesn't know how to lock a box cutter

not an argument

>The passengers thought it was a ransom hijacking until the last minute, and the flight was full of jew york liberals anyway so most of them probably didn't even consider fighting back.

You literally cannot know this and neither can I, at best what we have as evidence is the "recorded phone calls" of some of the in-flight passengers calling their mothers saying "Hi mom! It's me, Name! your son!" Which sound contrived and not in any way natural at all.

Fake as fuck and pre-recorded if you listen to it.

>If the CIAnigger remote theory is true, then one would expect both planes to fly in at least the general direction of their target.

Instead we have them doing perfectly squared circles over new york until finally deciding to crash into the towers

>>683473

>Didn't they say they had bombs on the planes?

I will level with you, no amount of bomnbs and jet fuel could ever do to those buildings what happened on that day, there is no way that bombs and jet fuel would destroy both buildings, turning them into fine dust and melted steel, all the way down to their sub-sub basements. without a complete controlled demolition, if there was a bomb, the "israeli art students" where drilling it into the fortified steel outer walls and inner concrete or whatever the central towers where built of.

> It's why authorities didn't order any intercept until after the first collisions. They didn't want to risk the lives of the passengers by escalating the situation. When they figured out what the real objective was they scrambled everything they had and told pilots who didn't have weapons to ram the hijacked planes. 2 hit the towers in NY, 1 got to the Pentagon before it was intercepted because DC airspace was actually quite soft at that time, and 1 went down in a field when the passengers found out what happened with the other 3 planes.

No planes where ever scrambled for long, VP Cheney gave the stand-down order, you can look this up if you don't believe me.

>But falling debris did. While Building 7 looked intact from a particular angle, rubble and burning material had crashed through the roof and started fires inside that gutted the interior. By the time it collapsed only the outer shell remained intact.

And that's enough to level the -entire- building turning it into dust as well?

You are giving me 2001 vibes of the "official" narrative.

IF falling debris was enough to destroy building 7, why didn't other buildings around the WTC structures collapse also? Nothing else did. And other buildings where hit harder.

>>683475

>The only point of contention here is that mudslimes are shit and cannot fly planes, which is obviously false since I have seen arab pilots.

Yes but of the 19 hijackers not all received flight training and the ones who did flunked, they where shit, had 0 experience, the planes where rc'ed, even a shit pilot could not maintain the planes doing circles for hours on end "until BOTH team finally decided to crash into wtc? I would understand if one of the hijackers had trouble but BOTH did the exact same thing. For hours.

>Honestly, no, american boomers are some of the most braindead and cattle-like persons to exist.

On second thought you're right.

>Are people just that stupid?

You know it ;)

>>683950

If only completely indestructible passports existed during the holocaust, we could've have proof and identification on its victims (^:

>>680213

only retarded internet faggots and butthurt europoors believe in truther shit

>>683589

Controlled demolition is used ALONG with goatherders hijackers.

This is more plausible than muh drone plane.

>>687221

Anyone with half a brain can just tell you the government knew about it and let it happen because it'd lead to a military contractor's wet dream as well as cement the US further as israel's attack dog. Just give the mudslimes a simple manual for how to set the plane on autopilot and let the rest take its course.

All the other theories are dogshit made to appeal to pre-QBoomers.

>>687247

This.

Arabs hijackers trained by jews and saudi who fly the planes.

Mossad and CIAniggers planting bomb inside the buildings before hands.

Zionist in government let it happen.

All of the above benefit.

The cold war meme would no longer justify rising military budgets

>>687312

Based texas flag

>>687493

Those faggots run holocaust advertisements on their videos now lol. They are worthless jew clowns that mix truth with lies and will never expose who did 9/11.

Read the washington post article THE DAY BEFORE 9/11! (Calling Israel a wildcard, saying they have the capabilities to attack US and make it look like muslims did it - A false flag attack in other words)

US military knew the attacks were coming and tried to warn people but they did nothing…