[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / random / 93 / biohzrd / hkacade / hkpnd / tct / utd / uy / yebalnia ]

/k/ - Weapons

Salt raifus and raifu accessories
Email
Comment *
File
Password (Randomized for file and post deletion; you may also set your own.)
Archive
* = required field[▶Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.
Embed
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Options
dicesidesmodifier

Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webp,webm, mp4, mov, pdf
Max filesize is16 MB.
Max image dimensions are15000 x15000.
You may upload5 per post.


There's no discharge in the war!

File: 08543e0f8d7b86e⋯.jpg (26.25 KB,592x336,37:21,09sino-tensions-tmagArticl….jpg)

755a7b No.671665 [Last50 Posts]

Does anyone have any insight on how China and Vietnam size up to each other militarily? Just looking online I found

>China has 2,035,000 active military personnel (510,000 reserve)

>Vietnam has 482,000 active military personnel (5,000,000 reserve)

I've also heard people claim the Chinese Coast Guard alone could successfully take on Vietnam's Navy, and I'd assume the PLAN is leagues ahead of Vietnam in terms of Naval power. Just how would a conflict between China and Vietnam play out? How further ahead is China in terms of military technology? Does Vietnam get any support from the US nowadays?

____________________________
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

568e40 No.671672

>active military personnel

Does this shit mean anything nowadays?

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

83e13c No.671677

>>671672

>Does this shit mean anything nowadays?

Care to explain why would it not?

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

568e40 No.671678

>>671677

Because 1 guy with a tank >>>> 1000 guys with a spear.

Military expenditure is where the money's literally at.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

dad227 No.671683

>>671678

Isn't the Vietnamese defensive policy something along the lines of "1000000 guys grab an AK an go innawoods"? China might be able to waltz into the country and capital fairly easily, but even with wall to wall warcrimes and bugman sociopathy they're going to have a hell of a time (and probably a net loss) of the occupation and probably fail to integrate the conquered provinces.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

83e13c No.671685

>>671678

>Because 1 guy with a tank >>>> 1000 guys with a spear.

That goes without saying, but as >>671683 pointed out, Vietnamese probably has an army "more advanced" than just a few thousands of spearmen.

>Military expenditure is where the money's literally at.

Arguable. If your country spends the majority of its military budget on raising a reservist force that has the task of getting together for 3-5 days every quarter a year and get drunk after the 8(?) hours of training a day and the sole purpose of propaganda, military expenditure isn't really going to worth shit…

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

bc360d No.671686

My country is badly, badly outmatched.

The viet cong were bribed by the chinks and didn't improve their military since the 70s.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

bc360d No.671688

>>671686

Also, the chinks are gonna overrun/shell Hanoi in day one, so any anti-chink strategy must involve switching capital back down to Saigon.

But this is basically not okay for the viet cong.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

226659 No.671695

>>671688

More like some hobbit hole in the middle of fuck nowhere

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

bc360d No.671698

>>671695

Well, Cu Chi tunnels are right next to Saigon.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

568e40 No.671706

>>671686

>defeated the most powerful White nation plus a few thousand nigger meatshields of history

>afraid of bugmen, that have never won a war and never won a battle without outnumbering their foes 10 to 1, that you easily defeated in the recent past even after being curbstomped by said Whites and while being a vassal state of them

A chink invasion attempt is probably the best thing that can happen for your national pride, autonomy and international image at the moment, especially given that you're going to have shitloads of convert aid from Murka, Russia and India at the same time.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

bc360d No.671712

>>671706

It's not the 70s anymore.

Back then the North was supported heavily by the USSR and the chinks, and the US were pussies, they were never going to invade the North so the war is just a matter of time while the South is ocean away from the US.

But looking at it now, Hanoi is directly at China's mouth, and Hanoi is the head of the current government of Vietnam.

Unlike the US, the chinks can occupy and do it for a long time since China is right next to Vietnam.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

6a9157 No.671715

>>671712

The chinese can't even occupy tibet, which is officially part of their territory. They're also losing badly in border clashes with India, so I'm not seeing how they're supposed to just "occupy hanoi".

The only thing Chinese can do is be rude on the open sea and build concrete fortresses on tiny islands.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

bc360d No.671716

>>671715

Well, the chinks are genociding tibet, and being successful at it.

> They're also losing badly in border clashes with India, so I'm not seeing how they're supposed to just "occupy hanoi".

Well, let's just say the vietnamese army hasn't advanced since the 70s.

I think we are still using T-64.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

bc360d No.671717

>>671716

Don't mistake that for coward talk though.

When I'm gotta fight, I'm gonna fight.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

83e13c No.671720

>Chinese autism human wave rush meets Viet jungle guerilla warfare

It would be interesting…

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

568e40 No.671725

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

6a9157 No.671754

File: 5d6a9f900041b20⋯.jpg (164.54 KB,600x400,3:2,new_chinese_light_tank.jpg)

>>671716

>I think we are still using T-64.

So are the Chinese fundamentally, they just put alumina panels on them which made them overweight and make them look like an angly piece of shit. And with higher altitude engine power drops because of lower oxygen content. It's why they couldn't bring a tank onto the Himalayas to oppress the Tibetans, their T-64 abortion literally can't climb a hill.

China just in 2017 invented a tank with no armor and a 100mm gun using a weak ass T-64 engine so it could operate in Tibet, at that altitude. Picrel it's 30 tonnes and based on a IFV hull.

Fucking just get a lot of MLRS, there is a reason Russia likes it, because you can wipe out a Chinese brigade in less than 60 seconds. And keep doing it over and over and over and over until they run out of bugmen because Chinks can't change their tactics.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

546b94 No.671764

>>671754

> over and over and over and over until they run out of bugmen

what if you run out of ammo?

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

e7bf5c No.671765

>>671715

>>671706

>>671754

Did you streloks did not heed what >>671686 said? China might be a delusional country headed by a thin-skinned honey bear but please don’t underestimate the enemy. Even if their army is sub-par by first world standards, that doesn’t mean that they won’t trounce their SEA neighbors in a land battle or sea battle.

>muh Sino-Vietnamese war you mudslime street shitter

That was in the late 70’s and China only see the war as a testing ground to see if their human-wave tactics still worked it did not. The PLA performed so fucking badly that once finished their objective (aka just going to their border and wreck some shit) they pretty much went up and left destroying everything in their wake. But they have changed since then, this is why they are eyeing to copy FUCKING EVERYTHING since the new tech would supplement their numbers.

I think you do not know the gravity of situation here since you don’t live next door to them, unlike our resident gooknigger here.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

6a9157 No.671767

>>671764

If an industrial nation runs out of solid rocket fuel and sheet metal pipes, they deserve to be exterminated.

>doesn’t mean that they won’t trounce their SEA neighbors in a land battle or sea battle.

The thing is they had multiple opportunities and even necessities to do so and never even showed an interest in doing it.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

8cdba1 No.671772

>>671754

>Fucking just get a lot of MLRS

The SU gave Vietnam a fuckton of those during that little spat in 79.

>>671765

They should have learned that lesson in 53. Continuing on with it in 79 shows they're incapable of learning from mistakes.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

de0018 No.671851

>>671765

What do Chinese infantry tactics look like?

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

bc360d No.671862

>>671851

China hasn't been in a full war since the 70s-80s, so it's different to gauge, but it seems they use combined arms tactics like everyone else now.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

fddb95 No.671863

File: 6ab79a67ce2270b⋯.png (16.16 KB,271x186,271:186,images.png)

>>671851

Still a viable strategy,especially if those civies are not theirs.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

0b9288 No.671905

China already tried to invade Vietnam and got absolutely dabbed on.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

786704 No.671910

This war already happened and once again China proved its eternal incompetence if not bugman retardation. Chinks can't take care of random Muslims in the badlands, Tibetans, and fucking India, why the hell would they lose a war against the supreme nation of Indochina. Also America won the war in terms of actual fighting and we were there to carry the south.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

362833 No.671917

File: e48478b262fdf8c⋯.gif (2.15 MB,480x270,16:9,204857t4n6ee41zc3ez22b.gif)

File: 23504e4c4a61e26⋯.jpg (457.31 KB,1140x822,190:137,how chinks imagine war wil….jpg)

>>671862

>combined arms

With the difference that they don't have the experience or capability to put that to use and the individual skill of the Ground Force, Air Force and Navy is lacking. Chinkoids can't even make fitting camo for their units and they are absolutely FUCKED in the mountains.

>tactics

"Combined arms" will inherently mean strategy, not tactics. Strategy is macro, tactics is micro.

The one and only MAYBE competent unit China has is the Rocket Force because all they have to do is click on a Beidou map and press a button.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

bc360d No.671943

>>671917

Well, like China, Vietnam hasn't been in a war since the 70s-80s.

But unlike China, Vietnam doesn't have shit, old shit or new shit.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

6a9157 No.671990

>>671917

It's also possible to have combined arms tactics, in fact all western tactics are based on it. A simple infantry fireteam has no ability to kill the enemy without help from artillery or aircraft, their only purpose is to do one small specialized task of harrying the enemy, slowing his movement, and hopefully pinning them down for High Explosive to do the job. That's why when western wars come about we shoot a million rounds to kill one enemy, because the bullets are basically a stream of "don't go there, stay where you are" signalling, until High Explosive can arrive to do the actual killing.

High Explosive is still king, although Russians do use Low Explosive for the same purpose because they're evil bastards.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

82c27d No.672020

>>671665

spraying water at a boat you don't like is SO bitch-tier.

I'll give the Russians one thing, they didn't spray water on that USN ship, they banged up against it.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

0b9288 No.672024

>>671917

Context on that first pic?

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

9b6010 No.672045

>>672020

Are tankers the anti-bitch?

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

0ccae4 No.672059

File: 9505307ad491153⋯.jpg (38.31 KB,610x405,122:81,GREEK.jpg)

>>672045

You bet, bitch.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

b7cd08 No.672062

>>672059

>Has the best merchant navy in the planet

<Doesn't have the best military navy in the planet

Why must we suffer so?

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

6a9157 No.672069

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

22092e No.672084

I've heard of some new radar technology being used to map the true ground elevation of places like the amazon jungle with dense tree cover and little to no infrastructure. It apparently revealed a few old incan or something structures buried in the jungle. Would technology like this make jungle combat any easier? would providing tree-by-tree maps of the jungle to soldiers help negate the serious mobility disadvantage of regular infantry?

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

362833 No.672104

>>672024

They were testing out a new amphibious carrier/IFV thing and it sunk.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

4a8abc No.672150

>>672084

>jungle combat

Why? You think Vietnam is still covered in jungle like in the 60s?

Here's the news, they cut down the trees faster than Agent Orange to sell timber to Laos/China.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

dad227 No.672474

>>672084

That kind of sensor would probably have bloody awful lag. You'd get a decent idea of where the enemy had been just a little too late to vector artillery or air units onto them. Also, the average insurgent base is a lot less visible than a Mesoamerican pyramid, what sort of resolution does it have?

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

1d4875 No.672479

File: f831715bde7aadc⋯.jpg (508.64 KB,1024x705,1024:705,4474083_full.jpg)

>>672020

Russians should spray water. In the water they they typically are the ships will freeze to death.

Threadly reminder that's what happened last time a western uber super technological warship visited Vladivostok.The Russia had to lend them the de-icers from the storage fleets…

(It's a Worst Korean destroyer using exactly the same de-icing tech as US ships…)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

bf5547 No.672482

>>672084

citation on the new incan structures?

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

1d4875 No.672493

>>672084

>would providing tree-by-tree maps of the jungle to soldiers help negate the serious mobility disadvantage of regular infantry?

No.

First of all, despite what burger thinks, the jungle is a neutral terrain. It doesn't favor anyone, past a few weeks of decent mobility training and puking your guts out to build local immunity and you're just as deep in shit as whoever you're fighting.

Second the problem in the jungle never was orientation, the north is still north in the jungle. The problem is visibility, which never exceed 50m, meaning you can't really bring firepower advantage to bear, meaning you can't really bring maneuver training advantage to bear… because you just don't know where the enemy is.

But it's completely neutral… it works both ways. Once you realize that and you adapt your tactics and maneuver to it (which the brits did perfectly in late WWII and the subsequent colonial insurgencies), fighting in the jungle is nothing special.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

40fecf No.672501

>>672493

What are these tactics? I mean, it sounds like that you just have to be mentally prepared that you can run into the enemy at any time.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

9f4cb0 No.672589

>>671715

>They're also losing badly in border clashes with India

whoa whoa whoa. Hol up *smacks lips* so you be sayin' that the poojeets have learned from the 1962 war? please citation

>>671754

>Fucking just get a lot of MLRS, there is a reason Russia likes it, because you can wipe out a Chinese brigade in less than 60 seconds.

reminds me of the based Orkan M-87 (sad there are only 4 now in use by Serbia). Love the idea of an on the cheap MLRS based on a commercial truck.

>>672493

>>672501

>which the brits did perfectly in late WWII and the subsequent colonial insurgencies)

seconding wanting to know WW2+malayan emergency strategies.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

1d4875 No.672595

>>672589

Just look up the "Fourgotten" Army history (British XIV army).

Basically 20k brits (mostly locals to boot) VS 100k Japanese (and around the same number of nationalist poo)…

After the initial Bill Slim (Field Marshal William Joseph Slim, 1st Viscount Slim, KG, GCB, GCMG, GCVO, GBE, DSO, MC, KStJ) realized that NO the nips weren't "good" at jungle fighting. They hated it as much as anyone.

He also realized that the Japanese would rather die than surrender… so fighting them was a terrible idea, all he had to do was putting them in a situation they had to do surrender (logically)… and watch them off themselves.

So he did the completely counter-intuitive thing to do, traded out his vehicles and almost all his motor vehicles for mules or airborne when possible.

That way he concentrated his few tanks with logistic and arty support to wipe out the few nips in the area those could be used as a battering ram, but it also gave his infantry good mobility, so he used his now quick infantry to cut off the nip lines bypassing most of the worst terrain on foot.

Then he did the thing also counter intuitive and quickly proceeded to NOT attack the Japanese (as he knew he was 1 VS 5 and worse he wouldn't get any reinforcement as he wasn't a priority while the nips were seriously pushing for India) and just do this: cut off their lines, use the jungle against them, avoid all unnecessary combat, focusing on supplies interdiction, then he told his men to always assume they were surrounded the minute they lost contact and dig in as he had prepared the necessary to have supplies delivered by air instead.

The result: the nips overextended, they had way too many people to supply that even doing nip things (the infamous Burma Death Railway…), they were in a position were the only choice was to surrender… so they just starved to death and died of malaria.

The thing was compounded by the fact the Japanese knew the British weren't that many and were second rate troops so they didn't stockpiled much supplies. They though that the soldiers wouldn't fight the poo nationalists and that the army would quickly collapse (as the British armies had tend to do prior).

Except that was the reason as to why it was so small in the first place because Lord Mountbatten and Slim weren't idiots they knew the area politics way better than the Japanese, their troops were roughly only 1/3 British but the rest weren't with many of the same nationalist poo (mostly Bengali, a few Gurkha, some mulsims, some Sikh, some Pakistani, lots of Marathi of old British service traditions) in it and everyone had to volunteer to serve.

So basically those guys were all British loyalists to begin with, used to quash rebellions and quite a few with already combat experience against the Italians as they were stationed in Africa and the middle east. Basically the exact opposite of what the Japanese had fought before.

It's one of the most brilliant campaign of WWII.

And nobody knows it.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

c25adc No.674112

>>671910

>Also America won the war in terms of actual fighting and we were there to carry the south.

You are save here, Sam… show me on the puppet where the rice farmer touched you.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

43550f No.674120

>>671754

Neither China nor Vietnam uses T-64, stop talking out of your ass.

Chinese tanks have nothing to do with soviet designs save for the Type 59 that is a T-54A without night equipment and already had a different stabilization system and the Type 60 that is a PT-76.

All subsequent tanks are an evolution of those designs but they're 100% domestic and quite often integrate LICENSE-build western equipment.

FFS most of their tanks use NATO 105mm shells for they have L7 guns mounted on them…

Saying that the Type 96 is a T-54 because they have some common design elements (as in the turret shape, where people sit, etc…) is like saying the M1 is a M48 with extra armor.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5953de No.674142

>>674120

>nothing to do with soviet designs

>All subsequent tanks are an evolution of those designs

lol almost everything in their arsenal can be directly traced back to soviet equipment, and any 'evolution' of design were really copies of improvements made elsewhere.

Their type 80 series, which is the main tank they rely on and the one most seriously in use is basically a T-54 that took some design lessons from T-64 and T-72, then sprinkle applique armor over their shame. It also has such low engine power that it can't climb hills which is pretty funny.

Just because its shapes its turret to look like a western tank doesn't make it a western tank.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

bc360d No.674150

>>674120

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_equipment_of_the_Vietnam_People%27s_Ground_Forces

Yeah, even worse, we use T-62.

Though I didn't know we import T-90, nice.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

43550f No.674189

>>674142

Congratulation, you're as dumb as a burger, you can't even read a proper sentence.

The Type 80 series have NOTHING in common with T-54 except a general exterior appearance. Which is saying utterly nothing, except that of course that any manufacturers tend to stay with shit they know how to do.

And for a good reason as the tanks they're (suspiciously) the closest to is the Vickers MBT and they followed almost entirely the same design changes as Vickers prototypes went through (again not suspicious at all).

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

52a820 No.674222

>>674189

>nothing in common

I thought tank shape was vital to its defensive characteristics.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

43550f No.674229

>>674222

It does, but having the same general shape doesn't fucking means it's the same tank.

It's like the retards that think that the sturmgewher is the AK ancestor… when in fact an AK is closer to a fucking M1 Garand.

They used a cast round turret on the original because it's what they knew they could make and once they got the tech to make wielded composite armor they did that.

Amusingly enough the other tank made in china, (but that they don''t use, the Type 90) the one they sell to Pakistan and what not… ARE T-64-based and they got the tech wholesale from Ukraine on the cheap along with their wives and daughter to pay for vodka bills in the 90's.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

82c27d No.680785

spraying water is a bitch move.

why do Russians ram US warships instead of spraying water? because they ain't bitches.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

4a8abc No.680826

>>680785

Aksually, it seems like it's USA who deliberately rams their ship into russian.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

f9e4fa No.680832

>>671686

Mate how the FUCK is that bad?

The current PLAN is still a joke I used to live next to the Hainan base fleet…. There destroyers were Argentina tier… Granted, better than Vietnam but not by much.

>>671765

Here's my take. Vietnam's survival depends on if the fuckers

1) Want to fight a gorilla war on the level of Afghanistan

2) Some other country closes the straights of Malaca or Hormuz.

This is because the chinese have TWO FUCKING weeks of Oil reserves for their military. THREE DAYS of oil for the entire economy. The PLA isn't the suicidal fanatics that just finished fighting the war with Japan, Korea, and under mao's orders fought the Indians in 64' while carving out a road of blood through tibet with no heavy equipment paid for in blood (5-10 bodies per km or 0.6 miles) and literally used sheep to transport logistics My great grandfather was on that trip….Then he saw the horrors known as the cultural revolution/GLF and came anti-commie. The current chinese army is more of a force dedicated to quelling internal decent and the eventual showdown with Russia/India filled with political transplants that make US muh tranny/wymn soldiers look good. The only thing keeping them relatively in line is the threat of execution. In addition, a motorized/mechanized force is not going to do well in the jungle. We all know what happened last time the US came to vietnam.

>>674229 Frog annon. They have a few 'design/factory' plants based in Yunnan/Sichuan (middle of bumfuck nowhere jungle usually) from what I heard. Apparently they straight up hired the entire groups of some of the Ex-soviet armarment designers and transplanted them there…. Those are rumors but I would not be surprised because there are no foreigners usually on G317/G318 in that area and the government tries to prevent that area from being a tourist attraction on purpose….

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

899bc5 No.680837

>>680832

What if the Soviet designers got drunk and just threw things on the blueprints that didn't work? Not like the Chinks would notice.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

441075 No.690342

File: 2af08defcecf083⋯.png (541.72 KB,1080x1237,1080:1237,sketch_1629598822087_2.png)

what if we turned all cars into mk19s?

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.



[Return][Go to top][Catalog][Nerve Center][Random][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[]
[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / random / 93 / biohzrd / hkacade / hkpnd / tct / utd / uy / yebalnia ]